HomeMy WebLinkAboutTract 15959 Village of Heritage Area 2DRAINAGE REPORT
For
VILLAGE OF HERITAGE
TRACT 15959 AREA 2
FONTANA, CALIFORNIA
January 8, 1999
Revised:March 31, 1999
Job No. 5195
Prepared By
Hall & Foreman, Inc.
545 North Mountain Avenue
Upland, CA 91786
(909) 982-7777
Prepared Under The Supervision of
qoJ
arold Garcelon, P.E.
RCE #31681, Exp. 12/31/99
TABLE OF CONTENTS
NARRATIVE
Introduction
Present Drainage Methods
Proposed Drainage Methodology
II. 025 Hydrology Calculations
On -Site Runoff Quantities
III. Qloo Hydrology Calculations
On -Site Runoff Quantities
IV. Hydraulic Calculations
Proposed/Existing Storm Drain Calculation
V. Street Capacity Calculations
Catch Basin Sizing
VI. References
(SBCFCD) dwawing "Etiwanda and San Sevaine Creek, Double Channel"
Sheets 6 & 24 of 40 (reduced print)
VII. APPENDIX
Soil Index Map (SBCHM)
Exhibit A - Criteria for Design of Flood Control Facilities
Tract 15959 Storm Drain Improvement Plans" sheet 2 of 3 (reduced print)
On -Site Hydrology Map (rear pocket)
NARRATIVE
Narrative
Introduction
This report will present hydrologic and hydraulic calculations which establishes storm
water runoff rates, as well as sizing of a proposed Storm Drain System for Tract 15959,
Area 2, Village of Heritage, in the City of Fontana. The project site is bounded by
Baseline Avenue to the north, the Etiwanda/San Sevaine double Channel to the west,
by West Heritage Circle to the east and by West Liberty Parkway to the south. The
project area is approximately 12 acres in size. All calculations follow recommendations
set forth by the "Fontana Master Storm Drain Study", as prepared by this firm. Project
parameters are for the proposed/existing Storm Drain System to convey Qloo on-site
flows.
Present Drainage Methods
The site is currently undeveloped and is mostly barren with native vegetation and
slopes in a south-west direction. There is an existing inlet at the southwest corner of the
site. A 30" R.C.P. collects runoff and drains into the Etiwanda Channel. A San
Bernardino County Flood Control District drawing titled "Etiwanda and San Sevaine
Creeks Double Channel", Sheets 6 of 40 and 24 of 40 were used as references. Sheet
24 includes the profile of the 30" R.C.P, called out as profile A-3. The 30" R.C.P. used a
developed runoff amount of 37.84 c.f.s. and a hydraulic grade line of 1255.80 feet. at
the outlet into the channel. Prints of the reference plans are also included in the
"Reference" Section of this report.
Proposed Drainage Methods
The proposed drainage method is by constructing a new 24" RCP from the channel
wall east to Longstreet Lane, where three catch basins located about the Longstreet
Lane/W. Liberty Pkwy intersection will discharge into the proposed 24" RCP. This new
Storm Drain is in close proximity to the referenced 30" RCP, per the referenced plans.
The drainage areas and node information are as shown on the enclosed Hydrology
Map. The proposed Qjoo site runoff was 37.93 c.f.s, near the referenced Q100 of 37.84
c.f.s. Catch basins on Liberty Parkway and the west side of Longstreet Lane are flow-
by's and the east side of Longstreet is a sump. Catch basin sizing calculations were
performed for a Q100 year storm. Street capacity/depth of flow calculations were
performed for a Q10o year storm.
Methodology
Calculations follow criteria established in the San Bernardino County Hydrology Manual
(SBCHM) and the City of Fontana Master Plan of Drainage. The site has soil type "A"
per the Hydrologic Soils Group Map. Qloo and Q 25 Hydrologic calculations were
performed with AES software "Rational Method Hydrology Program" Ver. 7.1. Street
Capacity and catch basin sizing calculations were executed with AES "Hydraulic
Elements 1" Ver. 6.1. Pipe sizing was performed with Los Angeles County "Water
Surface Profile Gradient (WSPG) software.
Conclusion
Calculations presented herein indicate the proposed/existing storm drain system has
sufficient hydraulic capacity to convey flows and to maintain emergency vehicle travel
during a 100 year storm.
Q25 HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS
****************************************************************************
RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE
(Reference: 1986 SAN BERNARDINO CO. HYDROLOGY CRITERION)
(c) Copyright 1983-90 Advanced Engineering Software (aes)
Ver. 5.8B Release Date: 1/16/91 Serial # 9388
Analysis prepared by:
HALL & FOREMAN, INC.
(714) 641-8777
************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY **************************
* HERITAGE VILLAGE
* AREA 2
*
* Q 25 FILE:5195D21.RES/DAT
**************************************************************************
FILE NAME: 5195D21.DAT
TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 11:22 3/31/1999
USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION:
--*TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION MODEL* --
USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = 25.00
SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 18.00
SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE _ .95
*USER -DEFINED LOGARITHMIC INTERPOLATION USED FOR RAINFALL*
10 -YEAR STORM 60 -MINUTE INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 1.040
100 -YEAR STORM 60 -MINUTE INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 1.520
COMPUTED RAINFALL INTENSITY DATA:
STORM EVENT = 25.00 1 -HOUR INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 1.2069
SLOPE OF INTENSITY DURATION CURVE _ .6000
FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 100.00 TO NODE 101.00 IS CODE = 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<<
DEVELOPMENT IS COMMERCIAL
TC = K*((LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]** .20
INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 520.00
UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 81.30
DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 77.00
ELEVATION DIFFERENCE(FEET) = 4.30
TC(MIN.) _ .304*[( 520.00** 3.00)/( 4.30)]** .20 = 9.678
25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 3.607
SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A"
COMMERCIAL SUBAREA LOSS RATE, Fm(INCH/HR) _ .0970
SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.53
TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .80 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.53
****************************************************************************
FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 101.00 TO NODE 102.00 IS CODE = 6
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>COMPUTE STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA« <<<
UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 77.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 67.80
STREET LENGTH(FEET) = 590.00 CURB HEIGTH(INCHES) = 6.
STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = 50.00
DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = 48.00
INTERIOR STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) _ .020
OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) _ .020
SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1
**TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING MEAN FLOW(CFS) = 9.05
STREET FLOW MODEL RESULTS:
STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) _ .44
HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 15.52
AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 3.58
PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY = 1.56
STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 2.75 TC(MIN.) = 12.42
25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 3.105
SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A"
RESIDENTIAL-> 5-7 DWELLINGS/ACRE SUBAREA LOSS RATE, Fm(INCH/HR) _ .4850
SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 5.50 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 12.97
EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 6.30 AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) _ .44
TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 6.30 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 15.13
END OF SUBAREA STREET FLOW HYDRAULICS:
DEPTH(FEET) _ .50 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 18.55
FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 4.25 DEPTH*VELOCITY = 2.11
****************************************************************************
FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 102.00 TO NODE 103.00 IS CODE = 6
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >COMPUTE STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<<
UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 67.80 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 65.19
STREET LENGTH(FEET) = 400.00 CURB HEIGTH(INCHES) = 8.
STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = 33.00
DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = 21.00
INTERIOR STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) _ .020
OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) _ .040
SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1
STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) _ .61
HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 16.23
AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 3.33
PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY = 2.41
STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 2.00 TC(MIN.) = 14.43
25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 2.839
SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A"
COMMERCIAL SUBAREA LOSS RATE, Fm(INCH/HR) _ .0970
SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.00 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.47
EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 7.30 AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) _ .39
TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 7.30 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 16.09
END OF SUBAREA STREET FLOW HYDRAULICS:
DEPTH(FEET) _ .61 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 16.23
FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 3.27 DEPTH*VELOCITY = 2.37
FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 103.00 TO NODE 104.00 IS CODE = 4
>>>>>COMPUTE PIPE -FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<< <<<
>> >>>USING USER-SPECIFIED PIPESIZE<<<<<
DEPTH OF FLOW IN 24.0 INCH PIPE IS 12.0 INCHES
PIPE -FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 10.2
UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 59.40
DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 58.30
FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 52.00 MANNING'S N = .013
GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 24.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1
PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 16.09
TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) _ .08 TC(MIN.) = 14.51
FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 104.00 TO NODE 104.00 IS CODE = 8
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<<
25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 2.829
SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A"
RESIDENTIAL-> 5-7 DWELLINGS/ACRE SUBAREA LOSS RATE, Fm(INCH/HR) _ .4850
SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.90 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 4.01
EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 9.20
AVERAGED FM(INCH/HR) _ .409
TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 9.20
PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 20.03
TC(MIN) = 14.51
FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 104.00 TO NODE 105.00 IS CODE = 4
>>>>>COMPUTE PIPE -FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<<
>>>>>USING USER-SPECIFIED PIPESIZE<<<<<
DEPTH OF FLOW IN 24.0 INCH PIPE IS 13.8 INCHES -
PIPE -FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 10.8
UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 58.30
DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 57.50
FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 38.00 MANNING'S N = .013
GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 24.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1
PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 20.03
TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) _ .06 TC(MIN.) = 14.57
FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 105.00 TO NODE 105.00 IS CODE = 8
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<<
-----------------------------
25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 2.822
SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A"
RESIDENTIAL-> 5-7 DWELLINGS/ACRE SUBAREA LOSS RATE, Fm(INCH/HR) _ .4850
SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 4.10 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 8.62
EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 13.30
AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) _ .432
TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 13.30
PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 28.60
TC(MIN) = 14.57
FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 105.00 TO NODE 106.00 IS CODE = 4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>COMPUTE PIPE -FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<<
>>>>>USING USER-SPECIFIED PIPESIZE<<<<<
DEPTH OF OF FLOW IN 24.0 INCH PIPE IS 16.3 INCHES
PIPE -FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 12.6
UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 57.50
DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 54.60
FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 111.00 MANNING'S N = .013
GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 24.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1
PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 28.60
TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) _ .15 TC(MIN.) = 14.72
------------
END OF STUDY SUMMARY:
TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 13.30 TC(MIN.) = 14.72
EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 13.30 AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= .43
PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 28.60
END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS
Qloo HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS
****************************************************************************
RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE
(Reference: 1986 SAN BERNARDINO CO. HYDROLOGY CRITERION)
(c) Copyright 1983-90 Advanced Engineering Software (aes)
Ver. 5.8B Release Date: 1/16/91 Serial # 9388
Analysis prepared by:
HALL & FOREMAN, INC.
(714) 641-8777
************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY **************************
* HERITAGE VILLAGE
* AREA 2
* Q 100 FILE: 5195D22.RES/DAT
**************************************************************************
FILE NAME: 5195D21.DAT
TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 11:23 3/31/1999
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--*TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION MODEL* --
USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = 100.00
SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 18.00
SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = .95
*USER -DEFINED LOGARITHMIC INTERPOLATION USED FOR RAINFALL*
10 -YEAR STORM 60 -MINUTE INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 1.040
100 -YEAR STORM 60 -MINUTE INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 1.520
COMPUTED RAINFALL INTENSITY DATA:
STORM EVENT = 100.00 1 -HOUR INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 1.5200
SLOPE OF INTENSITY DURATION CURVE = 6000
****************************************************************************
FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 100.00 TO NODE 101.00 IS CODE = 2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<<
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEVELOPMENT IS COMMERCIAL
TC = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]** .20
INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 520.00
UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 81.30
DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 77.00
ELEVATION DIFFERENCE(FEET) = 4.30
TC(MIN.) = .304*[( 520.00** 3.00)/( 4.30)]** .20 = 9.678
100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 4.542
SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A"
COMMERCIAL SUBAREA LOSS RATE, Fm(INCH/HR) _ .0970
SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.20
TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = .80 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 3.20
FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 101.00 TO NODE 102.00 IS CODE = 6
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>COMPUTE STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<<
UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 77.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 67.80
STREET LENGTH(FEET) = 590.00 CURB HEIGTH(INCHES) = G.
STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = 50.00
DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = 48.00
INTERIOR STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = .020
OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = .020
SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1
**TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING MEAN FLOW(CFS) = 11.81
STREET FLOW MODEL RESULTS:
STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) _ .47
HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 17.04
AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 3.91
PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY = 1.83
STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 2.51 TC(MIN.) = 12.19
100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 3.954
SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A"
RESIDENTIAL-> 5-7 DWELLINGS/ACRE SUBAREA LOSS RATE, Fm(INCH/HR) = .4850
SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 5.50 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 17.17
EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 6.30 AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) _ .44
TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 6.30 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 19.95
END OF SUBAREA STREET FLOW HYDRAULICS:
DEPTH(FEET) = .54 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 20.82
FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 4.48 DEPTH*VELOCITY = 2.43
FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 102.00 TO NODE 103.00 IS CODE = 6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>COMPUTE STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<< <<<
UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 67.80 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 65.19
STREET LENGTH(FEET) = 400.00 CURB HEIGTH(INCHES) = 8.
STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = 33.00
DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = 21.00
INTERIOR STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = .020
OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = .040
SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1
**TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING MEAN FLOW(CFS) = 21.54
STREET FLOW MODEL RESULTS:
NOTE: STREET FLOW EXCEEDS TOP OF CURB.
THE FOLLOWING STREET FLOW RESULTS ARE BASED ON THE ASSUMPTION
THAT NEGLIBLE FLOW OCCURS OUTSIDE OF THE STREET CHANNEL.
THAT IS, ALL FLOW ALONG THE PARKWAY, ETC., IS NEGLECTED.
STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = .70
HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 19.52
AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 3.46
PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY = 2.73
STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.92 TC(MIN.) = 14.12
100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 3.621
SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A"
COMMERCIAL SUBAREA LOSS RATE, FM(INCH/HR) _ .0970
SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.00 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.17
EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 7.30 AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) _ .39
TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 7.30 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 21.24
END OF SUBAREA STREET FLOW HYDRAULICS:
DEPTH(FEET) _ .70 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 19.52
FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 3.41 DEPTH*VELOCITY = 2.69
FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 103.00 TO NODE 104.00 IS CODE = 4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>COMPUTE PIPE -FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<<
>>>>>USING USER-SPECIFIED PIPESIZE<<<<<
DEPTH OF FLOW IN 24.0 INCH PIPE IS 14.3 INCHES
PIPE -FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 10.9
UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 59.40
DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 58.30
FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 52.00 MANNING'S N = .013
GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 24.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1
PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 21.24
TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) _ .08 TC(MIN.) = 14.20
****************************************************************************
FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 104.00 TO NODE 104.00 IS CODE = 8
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<< <<<
100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 3.609
SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A"
RESIDENTIAL-> 5-7 DWELLINGS/ACRE SUBAREA LOSS RATE, Fm(INCH/HR) _ .4850
SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.90 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 5.34
EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 9.20
AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) _ .409
TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 9.20
PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 26.50
TC(MIN) = 14.20
****************************************************************************
FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 104.00 TO NODE 105.00 IS CODE = 4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>COMPUTE PIPE -FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<<
>>>>>USING USER-SPECIFIED PIPESIZE<<<<<
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPTH OF FLOW IN 24.0 INCH PIPE IS 16.7 INCHES
PIPE -FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 11.4
UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 58.30
DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 57.50
FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 38.00 MANNING'S N = .013
GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 24.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1
PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 26.50
TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) _ .06 TC(MIN.) = 14.25
FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 105.00 TO NODE 105.00 IS CODE = 8
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<<
- -------------------------
100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 3.601
SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A"
RESIDENTIAL-> 5-7 DWELLINGS/ACRE SUBAREA LOSS RATE, Fm(INCH/HR) _ .4850
SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 4.10 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 11.50
EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 13.30
AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) _ .432
TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 13.30
PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 37.93
TC(MIN) = 14.25
FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 105.00 TO NODE 106.00 IS CODE = 4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>COMPUTE PIPE -FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<<
>>>>>USING USER-SPECIFIED PIPESIZE<<<<<
---------------
ASSUME FULL -FLOWING PIPELINE
PIPE -FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 12.1
UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 57.50
DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 54.60
FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 111.00 MANNING'S N = .013
GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 24.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1
PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 37.93
TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) _ .15 TC(MIN.) = 14.41
-----------
END OF STUDY SUMMARY:
TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 13.30 TC(MIN.) = 14.41
EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 13.30 AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= .43
PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 37.93
END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS
HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS
HEADING LINE !!O 1 I5 -
HEADING LINE NO 2 IS -
HEADING LINE NO 3 IS -
F 0 5 1 5 P
HATER SURFACE PROFILE - TITLE CARD LISTING
HERITAGE VILLAGE
PROPOSED LINE FOR AREA 2
FILE, 519522.INP/DUT
PAGE NO 3
DATE: 3/31/1999
TIM£: 16:19
POS15P
WATER SURFACE PROFILE - CHANNEL DEFINITION LISTING PAGE 1
CARD SECT CHN NO OF AVE PIER HEIGHT 1 BASE 2L 2R INV Y(1) Y(2) Y(3) Y(4) Y(5) Y(6) Y(7) Y(0) Y(9) Y(30)
CODE NO TYPE PIERS WIDTH DIAMETER WIDTH DROP
CD IB 4 1.50
CD 24 4 2.00
CD 5 3 0 0.00 4.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
W S ELEV
55.80
PAGE NO 2
RADIUS ANGLE ANG PT MAN H
0.00 0.00 0.00 0
RADIUS ANGLE ANG PT MAN H
0.00 27.00 0.00 0
RADIUS ANGLE ANG PT MAN H
0.00 0.00 0.00 0
ELEMENT NO
5 I5 A WALL EXIT
F 0 5 1 5 P
WATER SURFACE
PROFILE
- ELEMENT CARD LISTING
SECT
ELEMENT NO
1 IS
A SYSTEM OUTLET •
'
1112.71
57.39
U/S DATA
STATION
INVERT
SECT
ELEMENT NO
6 IS A JUNCTION •
980.65
54.61
24
ELEMENT NO
2 IS
A REACH
U/S DATA STATION
INVERT
SECT LAT -1 LAT -2
N
Q3 Q4
U/S DATA
STATION
INVERT
SECT
N
57.45
24 18 0
0.013
1097.14
57.06
24
0.013
ELEMENT NO
3 IS
A REACH
•
•
'
U/S DATA
STATION
INVERT
SECT
N
1107.99
57.29
24
0.013
ELEMENT NO
4 IS
A REACH
•
*
"
WARNING - ADJACENT SECTIONS ARE NOT IDENTICAL
- SEE SECTION NUMBERS
AND CHANNEL DEFINITIONS
U/5 DATA
STATION
INVERT
SECT
N
1112.71
57.39
24
0.013
W S ELEV
55.80
PAGE NO 2
RADIUS ANGLE ANG PT MAN H
0.00 0.00 0.00 0
RADIUS ANGLE ANG PT MAN H
0.00 27.00 0.00 0
RADIUS ANGLE ANG PT MAN H
0.00 0.00 0.00 0
ELEMENT NO
5 I5 A WALL EXIT
U/S DATA STATION
INVERT
SECT
1112.71
57.39
5
ELEMENT NO
6 IS A JUNCTION •
•
"
U/S DATA STATION
INVERT
SECT LAT -1 LAT -2
N
Q3 Q4
INVERT -3 INVERT -4
PHI 3
PHI 4
1115.21
57.45
24 18 0
0.013
11.4 0.0
57.55 0.00
20.00
0.00
ELEMENT NO
7 IS A WALL ENTRANCE
U/S DATA STATION
INVERT
SECT
FP
1115.21
57.45
5
0.500
WARNING - ADJACENT SECTIONS ARE NOT IDENTICAL
- SEE SECTION NUMBERS
AND CHANNEL DEFINITIONS
ELEMENT NO
8 IS A REACH
U/S DATA STATION
INVERT
SECT
N
RADIUS
ANGLE
ANG PT MAN H
1153.06
58.24
24
0.013
0.00
0.00
0.00 0
ELEMENT NO
9 IS A WALL EXIT
U/S DATA STATION
INVERT
SECT
1153.06
SB.24
5
ELEMENT NO
10 IS A JUNCTION r
•
• .
r
U/S DATA STATION
INVERT
SECT LAT -1 LAT -2
N
Q3 Q4
INVERT -3 INVERT -4
PHI 3
PHI 4
1155.56
58.30
24 16 0
0.013
5.3 0.0
59.00 0.00
60.00
0.00
ELEMENT NO
11 IS A WALL ENTRANCE
U/S DATA STATION
INVERT
SECT
FP
1155.56
58.30
5
0.500
F 0 5 1 5 P PAGE NO 3
WATER SURFACE PROFILE - ELEMENT CARD LISTING
WARNING - ADJACENT SECTIONS ARE NOT IDENTICAL - SEE SECTION NUMBERS AND CHANNEL DEFINITIONS
ELEMENT NO 12 IS A REACH
U/S DATA STATION INVERT SECT N RADIUS ANGLE ANG PT MAN H
1208.39 59.40 24 0.013 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
ELEMENT NO 13 IS A SYSTEM NEADWORKS
U/S DATA STATION INVERT SECT W S ELEV
1208.39 59.40 24 0.00
NO EDIT ERRORS ENCOUNTERED-COMPUTATION IS NOW BEGINNING
•• WARNING NO. 2 •• - WATER SURFACE ELEVATION GIVEN IS LESS THAN OR EQUALS INVERT ELEVATION IN HDWKDS, W.S.ELEV - INV . DC
LICENSEE: HALL 1. FOREMAN FOS15P PAGE 1
HATER SURFACE PROFILE LISTING
HERITAGE VILLAGE
PROPOSED LINE FOR AREA 2
FILE: 519522.INP/OUT
STATION INVERT DEPTH W.S. Q VEL VEL ENERGY SUPER CRITICAL HGT/ BASE/ ZL NO AVBPR
ELEV OF FLOW ELEV HEAD GRD.EL. ELEV DEPTH DIA IO 140. PIER
L/ELEM SO SF AVE HF NORM DEPTH ZR
....... ...ry.............r.xv.v...........rv...•.•.x•...x.v.....••.•.v.................x..x......r........•r....•.•...........•.•sx
980.65 54.61 1.941 56.551 37.9 12.17 2.299 58.850 0.00 1.941 2.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
3.92 0.02103 .026132 0.10 2.000 0.00
984.57 54.69 2.000 56.692 37.9 12.06 2.259 58.951 0.00 1.941 2.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
112.57 0.02103 .027801 3.13 2.000 0.00
1097.14 57.06 2.792 $9.852 37.9 12.06 2.259 62.111 0.00 1.941 2.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
10.85 0.02120 .026067 0.30 2.000 0.00
1107.99 57.29 3.114 60.404 37.9 12.06 2.259 62.663 0.00 1.941 2.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
4.72 0.02119 .028067 0.13 2.000 0.00
1112.71 57.39 3.147 60.537 37.9 12.06 2.259 62.796 0.00 1.941 2.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
WALL EXIT
0.00
1112.71 57.39 3.147 60.537 37.9 4.01 0.250 60.787 0.00 1.705 4.00 3.00 0.00 0 0.00
.IUNCT SIR 0.02400 .007465 0.02 0.00
1115.21 57.45 2.412 59.862 26.5 0.43 1.105 60.967 0.00 1.790 2.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
WALL ENTRANCE 0.00
1115.21 57.45 3.951 61.401 26.5 0.43 1.105 62.506 0.00 1.798 2.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
37.85 0.02007 .013722 0.52 1.364 0.00
1153.06 58.24 3.680 61.920 26.5 8.43 1.105 63.025 0.00 1.798 2.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
WALL EXIT 0.00
1153.06 58.24 3.681 61.921 26.5 2.40 0.089 62.010 0.00 1.344 4.00 3.00 0.00 0 0.00
.7UNCT STA 0.02400 .004594 0.01 0.00
1155.56 58.30 3.250 61.550 21.2 6.75 0.707 62.257 0.00 1.649 2.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
WALL ENTRANCE 0.00
LICENSEE: HALL 6 FOREMAN F0515P PAGE 2
WATER SURFACE PROFILE LISTING
HERITAGE VILLAGE
PROPOSED LINE FOR AREA 2
FILE: 519522.INP/OUT
STATION INVERT DEPTH W.S. Q VEL VEL ENERGY SUPER CRITICAL HGT/ BASE/ ZL NO AVBPR
ELEV OF FLOW ELEV HEAD GRD.EL. ELEV DEPTH DIA ID NO. PIER
L/ELEM SO SP AVE HF NORM DEPTH ZR
....••.....♦.fft..s....tttft....t•t•.••tf♦..fe•t••♦f•••tf♦.••.f•t•....••ff•.f••...ft•.............................................
1155.56 58.30 4.235 62.535 21.2 6.75 0.707 63.242 0.00 1.649 2.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
52.83 0.02082 .008782 0.46 1.171 0.00
1200.39 59.40 3.598 62.998 21.2 6.75 0.707 63.705 0.00 1.649 2.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
STREET CAPACITY AND CATCH BASIN
CALCULATIONS
I i
N
0 pr M & Fbren=4 Im.
. Cht E V—rg • pw" • sr"n • Rat vokii
5+5 K 161n16n At Sit 106• UdaN, G 91766-9991. 909-962-7777
QRGG\ 2
MOM MAP
03-31-9913:26:20
CBKEYL(AP.DING
****************************************************************************
HYDRAULIC ELEMENTS - I PROGRAM PACKAGE
(C) Copyright 1982-92 Advanced Engineering Software (aes)
Ver. 3.1A Release Date: 2/17/92 License ID 1237
Analysis prepared by:
HALL & FOREMAN, INC.
13821 NEWPORT AVENUE, Suite 200
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680-7803
714/544-3404
--------------------------------------------------------------------
TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 14: 2 3/31/1999
************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY **************************
* DEPTH OF FLOW
* LIBERTY/LONGSTREET
* CATCH BASIN A
**************************************************************************
****************************************************************************
>>>>STREETFLOW MODEL INPUT INFORMATION« «
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSTANT STREET GRADE(FEET/FEET) = .005200
CONSTANT STREET FLOW(CFS) = 21.24
AVERAGE STREETFLOW FRICTION FACTOR(MANNING) _ .015000
CONSTANT SYMMETRICAL STREET HALF-WIDTH(FEET) = 33.00
DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = 22.00
INTERIOR STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = .020000
OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = .040000
CONSTANT SYMMETRICAL CURB HEIGHT(FEET) = .50
CONSTANT SYMMETRICAL GUTTER-WIDTH(FEET) = 2.00
CONSTANT SYMMETRICAL GUTTER-LIP(FEET) = .03125
CONSTANT SYMMETRICAL GUTTER-HIKE(FEET) = .16700
FLOW ASSUMED TO FILL STREET ON ONE SIDE, AND THEN SPLITS
STREET FLOW MODEL RESULTS:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: STREET FLOW EXCEEDS TOP OF CURB.
THE FOLLOWING STREET FLOW RESULTS ARE BASED ON THE ASSUMPTION
THAT NEGLIBLE FLOW OCCURS OUTSIDE OF THE STREET CHANNEL.
THAT IS, ALL FLOW ALONG THE PARKWAY, ETC., IS NEGLECTED.
STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = :91
HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 23.72
AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 3.04
PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY = 2.47
t
************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY **************************
* CATCH BASIN SIZING
* AREA 2
* CATCH BASIN A
>>>>FLOWBY CATCH BASIN INLET CAPACITY INPUT INFORMATION<<<<
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Curb Inlet Capacities are approximated based on the Bureau of
Public Roads nomograph plots for flowby basins and sump basins.
STREETFLOW(CFS) = 21.24
GUTTER FLOWDEPTH(FEET) = .81
BASIN LOCAL DEPRESSION(FEET) = .30
FLOWBY BASIN WIDTH(FEET) = 27.00
>> >>CALCULATED BASIN WIDTH FOR TOTAL INTERCEPTION = 27.3
>>>>CALCULATED ESTIMATED INTERCEPTION(CFS) = 21.2
0 e Zi7 'i/ Li q L, D.
****************************************************************************
HYDRAULIC ELEMENTS - I PROGRAM PACKAGE
(C) Copyright 1982-92 Advanced Engineering Software (aes)
Ver. 3.1A Release Date: 2/17/92 License ID 1237
Analysis prepared by:
HALL & FOREMAN, INC.
13821 NEWPORT AVENUE, Suite 200
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680-7803
714/544-3404
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 15:42 3/31/1999
************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY **************************
* DEPTH OF FLOW
* CATCH BASIN B
* *
**************************************************************************
****************************************************************************
>>>>STREETFLOW MODEL INPUT INFORMATION<<<<
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSTANT STREET GRADE(FEET/FEET) _ .015000
CONSTANT STREET FLOW(CFS) = 5.26
AVERAGE STREETFLOW FRICTION FACTOR(MANNING) _ .015000
CONSTANT SYMMETRICAL STREET HALF-WIDTH(FEET) = 18.00
DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = 16.00
INTERIOR STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) _ .020000
OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) _ .020000
CONSTANT SYMMETRICAL CURB HEIGHT(FEET) _ .50
CONSTANT SYMMETRICAL GUTTER-WIDTH(FEET) = 1.50
CONSTANT SYMMETRICAL GUTTER-LIP(FEET) _ .03125
CONSTANT SYMMETRICAL GUTTER-HIKE(FEET) _ .12500
FLOW ASSUMED TO FILL STREET ON ONE SIDE, AND THEN SPLITS
STREET FLOW MODEL RESULTS:
--------------------------
STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) _ .38
HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 12.59
AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 3.09
PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY = 1.17
************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY **************************
* CATCH BASIN SIZING
* CATCH BASIN B
>> >>SUMP TYPE BASIN INPUT INFORMATION<<<<
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Curb Inlet Capacities are approximated based on the Bureau of
Public Roads nomograph plots for flowby basins and sump basins.
BASIN INFLOW(CFS) = 5.26
BASIN OPENING(FEET) _ .38
DEPTH OF WATER(FEET) _ .3B
>>>>CALCULATED ESTIMATED SUMP BASIN WIDTH(FEET) = 7.35
ICU
************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY **************************
* DEPTH OF FLOW CALCULATION
* CATCH BASIN C
* *
**************************************************************************
>>>>STREETFLOW MODEL INPUT INFORMATION<<<<
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSTANT STREET GRADE(FEET/FEET) = .015000
CONSTANT STREET FLOW(CFS) = 11.43
AVERAGE STREETFLOW FRICTION FACTOR(MANNING) _ .015000
CONSTANT SYMMETRICAL, STREET HALF-WIDTH(FEET) = 18.00
DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = 16.00
INTERIOR STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = .020000
OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = .020000
CONSTANT SYMMETRICAL CURB HEIGHT(FEET) = .50
CONSTANT SYMMETRICAL GUTTER-WIDTH(FEET) = 1.50
CONSTANT SYMMETRICAL GUTTER-LIP(FEET) = .03125
CONSTANT SYMMETRICAL GUTTER-HIKE(FEET) = .12500
FLOW ASSUMED TO FILL STREET ON ONE SIDE, AND THEN SPLITS
- ------------------
STREET FLOW MODEL RESULTS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = .47
HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 17.23
AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 3.70
PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY = 1.74
************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY **************************
* CATCH BASIN SIZING
* CATCH BASIN C
* *
**************************************************************************
>>>>FLOWBY CATCH BASIN INLET CAPACITY INPUT INFORMATION<<<<
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Curb Inlet Capacities are approximated based on the Bureau of
Public Roads nomograph plots for flowby basins and sump basins.
STREETFLOW(CFS) = 11.43
GUTTER FLOWDEPTH(FEET) = .47
BASIN LOCAL DEPRESSION(FEET) = .30
FLOWBY BASIN WIDTH(FEET) = 21.00
>> »CALCULATED BASIN WIDTH FOR TOTAL INTERCEPTION = 21.7
>>>>CALCULATED ESTIMATED INTERCEPTION(CFS) = 11.3
. J Jc 2 l l w/
k L.
,�
REFERENCES
IMF
to
ME
a Irml INS
N
N
522
Em
ININ
Offiffla qa
RON ME
a
mm
A— r7 Aw
,7
T
. ........ F -i
�,fw X"
4
LL
I CAWIN I Me f
r
.7 7
IT
%
'T
f
r,(Irpa,
Mr. j . . . . . . .
A
v
Alt
x
4r
T
t
14-
WM4.
sit. AIVULE I
'T
t -.P I
W6 =_2z
L
LE
04 7L
. . . . . . 4- 7-j
__JT
:I�-_i _ .i_� 1 i �- I � i
L
i -Q - '�—� .�... i -t I I - -i-_ .�.--I-.!_#_' � {{-�. t.-___ ! c -_'j_ --1`T- 'U.<: _ 1 _ _12-
Jrr aw
lk
di
t
A. v
i 'k 7
A T f
-77
:31.
+7 4—
I_xr
-T lei
;.-4 -4-1 !.; : - - 1. - I - :.- I . I : i I r 1: I __ -
�1+1111 L
-19
Fill
B -A
mif4! 4--
7
,
.1d 1
JF!
5 L� 4— - t . . . . . . .
1-45
7
P. I
J J
Cq,4,V Sr*
:5Z-,ff: 9/ffT 9-
m
R WiNG
;SEE H.0 P. CONNECTIC N TO VERTICAL�AWCI A SHf,
10
is, Owe 1'..h
7
on
7A f 4 *1
.T�, "- -4 REVISIONS
LT x
4
MARK I OAfE I DESCRIPTION
de
Pi op w d I it d t* 0 03te Uw
Hit 311
7
i, E; �L. a
iA
.7 PRO,[ DRAWN BYm. REVIEM
La..
26 29 Z'
_pJ SUBUIT TEO By
CIVIL ENGINEERING - /AND MANNING LAND SURVEYING
PREPARED UNDEN TSUPERVIS
HE -014 OF RECOMME140ED
MTV fl' R c f 's 11P DAIF
Ell milli
WIN
,volm mcf4mr.
WEH®®®®®
loin
Immull 11
am% mmmum
REM emmol
9019figamplim
1029ampffm
11919 in
REM Eggs
#,!I Isis
is
In 2211
XMIRMIN
mmaimm
ammIgEmi
mmammmm
$AN,,BkRNARDIN0 COUNTY,.,.
FLOOV CONT ROL' DISTRICV ':-k
.:;CREEKS SYSTEMS
ETIWA.NOA AND SAN SEVAIX CREEKS'
a
FOOTMW BLVO!. 10 VICTORIA..,
TES ALE- Ij,FILE !0 j!?.7WG NO C r 1:70,
ERT.' 4'- 11Go. -'s
ijim
m
H
Iffiffiffis
MEN
gmummumm0
umum
wmm� on
M11111111104 "110m
111mm7
rm
mmull
ImEgmmms miVUArl 9
ININ
Offiffla qa
RON ME
a
mm
A— r7 Aw
,7
T
. ........ F -i
�,fw X"
4
LL
I CAWIN I Me f
r
.7 7
IT
%
'T
f
r,(Irpa,
Mr. j . . . . . . .
A
v
Alt
x
4r
T
t
14-
WM4.
sit. AIVULE I
'T
t -.P I
W6 =_2z
L
LE
04 7L
. . . . . . 4- 7-j
__JT
:I�-_i _ .i_� 1 i �- I � i
L
i -Q - '�—� .�... i -t I I - -i-_ .�.--I-.!_#_' � {{-�. t.-___ ! c -_'j_ --1`T- 'U.<: _ 1 _ _12-
Jrr aw
lk
di
t
A. v
i 'k 7
A T f
-77
:31.
+7 4—
I_xr
-T lei
;.-4 -4-1 !.; : - - 1. - I - :.- I . I : i I r 1: I __ -
�1+1111 L
-19
Fill
B -A
mif4! 4--
7
,
.1d 1
JF!
5 L� 4— - t . . . . . . .
1-45
7
P. I
J J
Cq,4,V Sr*
:5Z-,ff: 9/ffT 9-
m
R WiNG
;SEE H.0 P. CONNECTIC N TO VERTICAL�AWCI A SHf,
10
is, Owe 1'..h
7
on
7A f 4 *1
.T�, "- -4 REVISIONS
LT x
4
MARK I OAfE I DESCRIPTION
de
Pi op w d I it d t* 0 03te Uw
Hit 311
7
i, E; �L. a
iA
.7 PRO,[ DRAWN BYm. REVIEM
La..
26 29 Z'
_pJ SUBUIT TEO By
CIVIL ENGINEERING - /AND MANNING LAND SURVEYING
PREPARED UNDEN TSUPERVIS
HE -014 OF RECOMME140ED
MTV fl' R c f 's 11P DAIF
Ell milli
WIN
,volm mcf4mr.
WEH®®®®®
loin
Immull 11
am% mmmum
REM emmol
9019figamplim
1029ampffm
11919 in
REM Eggs
#,!I Isis
is
In 2211
XMIRMIN
mmaimm
ammIgEmi
mmammmm
$AN,,BkRNARDIN0 COUNTY,.,.
FLOOV CONT ROL' DISTRICV ':-k
.:;CREEKS SYSTEMS
ETIWA.NOA AND SAN SEVAIX CREEKS'
a
FOOTMW BLVO!. 10 VICTORIA..,
TES ALE- Ij,FILE !0 j!?.7WG NO C r 1:70,
ERT.' 4'- 11Go. -'s
APPENDIX
c
a
O
m
w
w
w
z
F -
w
w
00 -YEAR FLOOD CONTAINED WITHIAL STREET R/W
NOMINAL HYDRAULIC GRAD
OPEN CHANNEL
5 -YEAR FLOOD CONTAINED WITHIN THE TOP OF CURBS
INITIATE A STORM DRAIN OR CHANNEL WHEN EITHER
CONDITION IS EXCEEDED
w
F
cn
/rg! 2mmao, w,
K0"lLL AVEMIE COtTA Yfbl G m
w
z
w
w
N
UNDERGROUND STORM DRAIN
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF FONTANA
MASTER STORM DRAINAGE FACILITIES
CRITERIA FOR DESIGN
OF FLOOD CONTROL FACILITIES
RE:
EffE
Mm
�^ �t-
�'-�.
"._....-'r=f:=-=^�-:�-£'=--'•'-r--._._.-...--._.-t--.. �._--.">-y=:_.sem
-�"'_" '-t=-.=-=: _'. _i._._ =I-:..
._ -.-:r•=•--•-•-
. .........
E CALM
40'
10+00 11+06 12+00
PL
LONGSTREET LANE
I rj I f-
=�LCVI R 1� I
3 5
2T j"E WALL IM
LOT 5 'ITE PEM"
-D:ST PLANTING
W LIMTY F%W
OLSE
RpJ At SA STA 1143M
L 'TA:j$+XW I SL SIX I✓ 'e
- - - - - --- -- ---
LEGEND:
its RCP ESMT EASEMENT
SIM
e
TO, TOP OF CURB ELEVATION
EVATION
FS FINISHED SURFACE ELE
&L SEk 11+4L71
'I
SCALE-- 1* 10' FL FLOW LINE ELEVATION
FG FINISHED GROUND ELEVATION
DAYLIGHT LINE
TRACT BOUNDARY / PROPERTY LINE
DIRECTION OF FLOW AND GRADE RATE
.4
MUM
bm WMEW::./ PIKF. WMM
itz R 10+91.20 -R— RIDGE LINE
ma PE -7-
7 INDICATES PROPOSED SLOPE
— INDICATES RETAINING WALL
112.
80 PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE CCNTUtJR
\'a R13 FACE CURB FACE
"6
EXSTING CONTOUR
NTS NOT TO SCALE
V-' PHASE LINE
7
S MH MANHOLE
JS JUNCTION STRUCTURE
/
�- - �`'�� TS TRANSITION JUNCTION STRUCTURE
-'-
_ .. _ .-. ---_
LAT LATERAL
Pd -
Pe SD STORM DRAIN
S SEWS
r.
11811
emg M 55-w FL
R W WATER
ec BEGINNING Of CURVE
CURVE TABLE
EC END OF CURVE
°8'GB GRADE BREAK
N=bw D118 R." Lwwo T=
Imor CLNM FAOE-�
RETAIL
CB CATCH BASIN
NO SCAM
INV INVERT
21WM44V4r 22-W 11 currER
UNE
dDiF NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO VE�RIFY PRC POINT OF REVERSE CURVE
CL CENTERL)NE
SOME GRADE ELEVATON VALUES ARE DEPTH & LOCATION OF
CCINS71RUC7M N07M RETAIL °C° J- 11
ABBREVIATED. vvHERE AN ABBREVIATED E)aST. 24' RCP PRIOR 40' cf Ad ar 12W
ELEVATION OCCURS,- ADD 1200 TO THE TO CONSTRUCTION AS Fair,
FIRST OF WORK
&CONST. 24' DIA. R.C.P., O -LOAD PER PLAN
VALUE TO OBTAIN THE ACTUAL ELEVATION. ORDER MUM =M 1-40'
CONST, MANHOLE -PIPE TO PIPE PER APWA SM. f321-1. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET NO.3
&CONST. CATCH DAM PER CITY OF FONTANA STD. DETAIL 121
CITY OF FONTANA, CALIFORNIA
REMOVE DaSTINKI MANHOLE
ABANDON DOSTM 30- STORM DRAM DRAWN BY
OIE-iL-BREAK INTO DaST. CHANNEL WALL PER SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY STD., SIDE DRAM INSTAILLATION DETAIL. IiIS.P. I87 A SEE SHT.3 M & Fbrenw, Inc. ED STORM DRAW UPROVEMENT PLANS SCALE:
&1CONSTRUCT PIPE CLOSURE PER DETAIL ON SHLI ESIGNEDHORIL- 1*. - 40r
SP 101-1--Z&-3- SEE SIT -3 Civil Engineering - Planning - Surveying - Publio Wake C -K & EALBY ,
an:�NSTRUCT OUTLET PROTECTION BARRIER NO. I PER S8CFCD STD.VERT: 4!
NSTRUCT UNDERGROUND UTILITY MARKER PER SBCFCD STD SIR 204 SEE DETAX. ON SHT2 (LOCATION TO BE SET BY DISTRICT INSPECTOR) N. 24M 545 N. Mountain Aw $te- 106 Upland, CA 91786-9997 - (909) 982-7M FOR
I
REMOVE REREPLACEDGMM PAVEMENT PER FONTANA S11D.131
RPREPARED
E1;1 2/31/01 CHECKED BY OATF-
UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: A.Q & ILEL TRACT NO. WOOD lz/wm
JOB NO. DR. NO SHT. NO,
1
PENSIONS AL uly
.1L APPROVAL
OF KILILARD L BOVIMAN R.C.E. 245 DATE: Lfry-lU*af-Ek-k-1x ft 2MM 2a90 -A 2 OF 3
DATE 5195 1 73
I - I
CITY OF FONTANA
IST01"Uh IDIRUU101,11 PLANS
FOR
7 F -ACT 15M
TRACT X5959-1
�l
Baca !_r, VE.
CITY OF FONTANA GENERAL NOTES
FOR
THE CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SCIE AND COMPLETE
k, Irl
PLANS
Fist _UB SITE C-�ITENS IURING THE COURSE IIF
ITEM
STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT
CONSTRUCTION
CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SAFETY Off ALL PERSONS
13939-1
CUANTITr UI
AND PROPERTY, THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY
CONSTRUCT 24' DIA R.C.P., D -LOAD PER PROFILE
201
AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HGURSI AND THAT THE
1.
ALL WORK SHAFT BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THS PUNS THE CITY OF
CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFEND, IN AND Ha.D THE OWNER AND THE
1
FCNTANA STANDARD PLANS, THE CONTRACT PREVISIONS AND THE STANDARD
NDiALL
HAFCHL£SS FROM ANY AND ALIABItTY, REAL QR ALLEGE,
O
SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBUC MARKS CONSTRUCTION (GREEN BOOK LATEST
IN CONUECTMM VITH THE PERFMYAHC£ IF' WORK IN THIS PROJECT,
l
EDITION),
EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NENa rrr CE OF TFE
W -10',V-3.5 , DETAIL 'B'
.. ,_:_._-.c
OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.
2
CONSMUCTION PERMITS SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY Q FONTANA
W -14',V-6.35', DETAIL 'e'
j
ENGWc' RING DIVISION PRIOR TO START OF ANY WORK WTH IN THE CITU'
� �� ItTn STAti'i1yc�
-
LAT
UNITS. INSPECTION COORDNADON SHALL BE PECUESTED AT LTA -ST 7V.o
SD
STCAM DRAIN
WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY WOR- CALL (909) 350-7610
THE EXISTEmm- AND LDCATim OF ANY umERwnw LTu= Dig
REMOVE EXISTING DOWN DRAM
-ABANDON
i
STRUCTURES SHOWN IN THESE PLANS WAS OBTAINED BY A SEARCH OF
3.
TFL CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE ANY FIRE HYDRANTS OR WATER
AVAILABLE RECORDS. TO THE BEST OF RIR KNOWLEDGE, THERE ARE NI
i
MAIN VALVE'S_ CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THH"_ APPROPRIATE
EXISTING UTILITIES EXCEPT THOSE SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THE
8
WATER COMPANY FOR VALVE OPERATIONS AND WATER REQUIREMENTS.
CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES TO
PRC
PONT OF REVERSE CURVE
PROTECT THE UTILITIES SHOWN, AND IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION
4,
STATIONING REFERS TO THE CENTERUHE OF STORM DRAM EXCEPT WHERE
OF AUD ANY DAMAGE TEL THESE LINES (IR STRUCTURES.
OTHERWISE NOTED.
M.,ffmr.
5.
ALL UNDERGROUND WORK SHALL BE COMPLETED, TESTED AND APPROVED
THE ENGINEER PREPARING THESE PLANS WILL NOT BE
g
PRIOR 10 PAVING OF STREETS
RESPONSIBLE FOR, OR LIABLE FFR, UN.4UTHIIR):ZED CHANCES OR USES OF
'-
THESE PLANS. ALL RE ESTE Cri:ir--S TO THE PLANS MUST BE IN VRITI}:[
6.
THE LOCATIONS OF PUBLIC URUTES SHOWN HAVE BEEN DEIFRM* D FROM
NO MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PR£PARER OF THESE PLANS'
AVAILABLE INFORMATION. HOWEVER, IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
THE CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE THE TRUE LOCATION AND ELEVATION N THE
FIELD OF ANY EXISTING UTILITIES. AND TO EXERCISE PROPER PRECAUTIONS TO
AVOID DAMAGE TWMEM. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UNDERGROUND
SERVICE ALERT FOR UTILITY LOCATION BEFORE EXCAVATION AT 800-422-4133.
7.
ALL MANHOLE$ CLEANOUT FRAMES AND COVERS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED
SX INCHES FiNF'iED GRADE MID SHALL BE RAISED TO GRADE BY THE
PAIANG CONTRACTOR UPON COMPLETION OF PAVING.
8.
REFE? TO CITY OF FONTANA UNDERGROUND U71UTY LOCATION STANDARD
DETAE NO. 124.
9.
THE CONTRACTOR(S) SHALL COORDINATE CONSTRUCTION WITH ALL UTILITY
COMPANIES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, GAS, TELEPHONE, ELECTRICAL.
UG HTTNG, CABLE TELEVISION. LANDSCAPING, LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION,
DOMESTIC WATER, RECLAWED WATER, SEWER, STORM DRAIN, AND 8-000
CONTROL.
10.
AS BOLT DRAWNGS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO THE
ENGINEER OF RECORD, WHO SHALL PROVIDE RECORD DRAWINGS TO THE CITY
ENGINEER.
11.
NO CONCF=- SHALL BE PLACED UNTIL THE FORMS AND REINFORCING
p
STEEL HAVE BEEN PLACED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED.
5
/
12-
THE WALLS AND FACES OF ALL EXCAVATIONS GREATER THAN FIVE (5) FEET
M DEPTH SHALL BE GUARDED BY A SNORING, SLOPING OF THE GROUND OR
o
OTHER APPROVED MEANS TRENCHES LESS THAT FIVE (5) FEET SHALL ALSO BE
/
GUARDED WHEN THE POTENTIAL EXISTS FOR GROUND MOVEMENT.
' QTY C{r
13.
THE CONTRACTOR SHA! OBTAIN A P£R41T TO PERFORM EXCAVATION OR
c
'
TRENCH WORK FROU THE CAUFOf NNA STATE DMSON OF INDUSTRIAL SAFETY.
SEE 'STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS' SECTION
14.
NO TRENCH BACCFLL• SHALL TALE PLACE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF
THE (7TY5 MSPECTDR.
15.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT CAUSE ANY MUD. SILT OR DEBRIS TO BE
lmsai
DEPOSITED ONTO PUBLIC OR ADJACENT PROPERTY DURING CONSTRUCTION.
ANY MUD OR DEBRIS ON FUBUC PROPERTY 54ALI_ BE REMOVED SOIEDIATELY.
//
H OF I`dR Aka.-yEJ
DUST SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY WATERING OR OTHER APPROVED MEANS
/
16.
111.E SOILS ETNCNEEP, SHAH! CERTIFY ALL BACKS U1 CCWIPACTION AT
.A..
INTERVALS REQUIRED BY THE INEPLC FAEWR E TO OBTAIN THE REQUIRED
�
DENSITY SHALL REQUIRE RE -WORKING OF THAT PORTION OF THE YORK UNTIL
_
!
THE SPECIFIED DENSITY IS OBTAINED.
Opy ON N
C4 TY
`+'' + OF FONTANA
17,
ALL MATERIALS AND METHODS ARE SUBJECT THE THE APPROVAL OF THE
CITY F1NGNEER.
18.
ADEQUATE CONTROL STAKES SHALL BE SET BY THE ENGNEER TO ENABLE
THE CONTRACTOR TO CONSTRUCT THE WA,RHC TO THE PLAN GRADIN THE
CONTRACTOR %CALL. BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PRESERVATION Q'
BSICIHUARYJS AND CONTROL STAK'4G DURNG C ONSTRUCT,ON.
19.
CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN TO PREVENT GRADES, DITHCES, AND SWALES FROM
UNDERMINING STREET IMPROVEMENTS. UPON MS'ECTION OF THE ITE, THE
CITY ENGINEER MAY REQUIRE TEMPORARY GUNITE SWALES ENTERING OR
LEAVING IMPROVEMENTS.
20.
NO MATERIAL OR EQUIPMENT SHALL BE STORED IN THE PUBUC RIGHT or
WAY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENG;NEERL
21.
Pfd OR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHAH EXPOSE !7]SBNG
ELEtii'dri. TF1 FPHONF
FACRJDES, AND VERIFY ELEVATION AND LOCATION OF CONNECTIONS. CITY
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. PACIFIC BELL
APPROVAL OF CON ECTIQN5 TO EXISTING FACP.ITIES DOES NOT 114LY
370 R PEFF•E2 AVE 4025 LA PALMA STRUT
CORRECTNESS OF ELEVATIONS OR LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS
PoA1.70, CA 92378 ANAHFIHM, CA. 92M7
Z2.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FDR PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVEE
UNDERGROUND: (909) 357-6233 (714) 237-6146
TRANSMISSIONS (909) 1775-5100 ATTN- OELIA LERMA
MEANS OF DUST CONTROL WHICH SHALL INCLUDE PROVISIONS FOR ADEQUATE
PiPEIJHZS- (213) 657-12a5
WATERING, DURING EXCAVATION AND GRADING.
IXSTR--IIDOHC (909) 357--6233
23.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LOCATION AND
SEVER
PROTECTION OF ALL UNDERGROUND FACLITIES WHETHER SHOV44 ON THESE
Etl CITY
A8353
PLANS OR NOT.
SOUTHERN CAUFCRNTA GAS CO. 835 SI RRAFON
SIERRA AVE.V c
24.
RIM ELEVATIONS SHOYM ON PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY AND ARE NOT
1981 WGONIA AVE FONTANA, CA 02335
REDLANDS, CA 92374 (909) 350-6632
TO BE I FOR SETTING MANHOLE RONGS,
(909) 335-7744 AT1N: CARLOS NAVARRO
25.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTIFYING AIL AGENCIES
DAHEMGENCI�S• (SOD) 427-2200
CONCERNEO %Mi THE RELOCATION OF FACILITIES LOCATED WVIHIH THE AREA
cAa F rn
TO BE IMPROVED AND INTERFERING WITH CONSTRUCTION PRIOR M
COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION.
.ham COMCAST Cyt E
25.
IT SHALL. BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN
CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 1205 DUPONT AVE
ONTARIO, CA, 91761
BARRICADES, DElUNEATORS OR OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AT ALL
9641 SAN BERNAM940 ROAD (909) 390-4738
TAPES
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
(909) 483-7440
27.
SURVEY MONUMENTS THAT WILL BE DESTROYED AS A RESULT OF THS
CITY OF FONTANA
IST01"Uh IDIRUU101,11 PLANS
FOR
7 F -ACT 15M
TRACT X5959-1
�l
Baca !_r, VE.
mFDf
EASESENT
STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTION NOTES & QUANTITIES:
k, Irl
3" MAX.
SUL COM
FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
TRACT
15959
QUANTITY
13939-1
CUANTITr UI
O7
CONSTRUCT 24' DIA R.C.P., D -LOAD PER PROFILE
201
- I LF
DIRECTION OF FLOW AND GRADE RATE
Q
CONSTRUCT MANHOLE -PIPE TO PIPE PEP. APWfA STD. p21-1 I(`
1
- LF
-
O
CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN PER CITY OF FONTANA STD. DETAIL 121
PROPOSSM FINISHED GRADE CCW TO UR
l
EXLSRNG CONTOUR
�;,
W -10',V-3.5 , DETAIL 'B'
.. ,_:_._-.c
g
`\`T��;1
MANHOLE
W -14',V-6.35', DETAIL 'e'
j
_ EA
TRANSITION JUNCTION STRUCTURE
LAT
Mf�21-,V-3.5, DETAIL 'A'
SD
STCAM DRAIN
S
OSI
-u
REMOVE EXISTING DOWN DRAM
-ABANDON
i
_ EA
.rr.. •''�
r
STORM DRAIN
EXISMG 30' STORM DRAIN
i
- IEA
08
8
BREAK INTO EXIST. CHANNEL WALL PER S.S. CNTY. STD. r -p, 187 A
INVERT
PRC
PONT OF REVERSE CURVE
7
CONSTRUCT PIPE CLOSURE PER DE AUL HEREON
8
CONSTRUCT OUTLET PROTECTION HARRIER NO. 1 PER SBCFCD STD. SP 101-1,-2,h-3 y!
1
- EA
. )' .''•-= -:-. ...
g
CIXiSTRUCT UNUcRMONND UTILITY UAOCER PER SECFCO STD SP 2D4
'-
-
WCUT,RE110YE h REPLACE EXISTING PAVEMENT PER FONTANA SM.131
SITE DETAIL ON SHEET NO.3*
20
- LF
mFDf
EASESENT
A i(�
k, Irl
3" MAX.
SUL COM
FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION
FL
6C
FG
FINISHED GROUND ELEVATION
DAYLIGIT LINE
TRACT BOUNDARY / PROPERTY LKE
T
DIRECTION OF FLOW AND GRADE RATE
.-R----
RIDGE LINE
I I
INDICATES PROPOSER SLOPE
-
:; SCALE 1'-17.
SO
PROPOSSM FINISHED GRADE CCW TO UR
- -----
EXLSRNG CONTOUR
�;,
NOT TO SCALE
.. ,_:_._-.c
g
`\`T��;1
MANHOLE
4
JUNCTION STRUCTURE
TS
TRANSITION JUNCTION STRUCTURE
LAT
LATERAL
SD
STCAM DRAIN
S
426
PROPOSED RC
BC
.rr.. •''�
r
STORM DRAIN
CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPLACED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE BASS
QE
ENGINEER ONE WEEK PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION SO THAT TIES TO MONUMENTS -
CAN BE ESTA13USHED FOR LATER REPLACEMENT OF THE WONUMEET. THE BEARINGS SSHOY44 HEREON ARE BASED ON THE CENTERU
Underground Service Alerf
a Call: TOLL FREE
1-800
422-4133
+ TWO WORKING DAYS
.-- BEFORE YOU DIG
DRILL a' INTO
EXIOUST 30' RCP/0WINE�
A GRT M ASI BARS 9
�6" O.C.BOTH WAYS ! ST 30' RCP
! 8.
6'
/ TYP
BRICK B MORTAR
IMM GUNTTE TO_ PWG NEAR IPE CUTLET
\ CHANNEL FACE
-
FI'SORRY SEALI EXIST
CHANNEL FACE PIPE FULL YRTONE
�+ SACK CONCRETE
E MIX
FiAH 01AMM A -A
N �l Fie CLOSURE DETA"1
r11<
6' MAX- SIZE NATIVE
-- SOIL COMPACTED BOX
1' MAX. SIZE SELECTED
•• TONATIVE BGS REOONG COMPACTED
TYPi-AL L0=3 FG; t'.r^P
ES+NT
EASESENT
TC
TOP OF CURB ELEVATION
FS
FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION
FL
FLOW UNE ELEVATION
FG
FINISHED GROUND ELEVATION
DAYLIGIT LINE
TRACT BOUNDARY / PROPERTY LKE
T
DIRECTION OF FLOW AND GRADE RATE
.-R----
RIDGE LINE
I I
INDICATES PROPOSER SLOPE
-
INDICATES RETAINING WALL
SO
PROPOSSM FINISHED GRADE CCW TO UR
- -----
EXLSRNG CONTOUR
NTS
NOT TO SCALE
.. ,_:_._-.c
PHASE UTNE
NH
MANHOLE
4
JUNCTION STRUCTURE
TS
TRANSITION JUNCTION STRUCTURE
LAT
LATERAL
SD
STCAM DRAIN
S
SLWS2
W
WATER
BC
BEGINNING OF CURVE
EC
END G CURVE
GB
GRADE EREAK
08
CUTCH BASIN
INV
INVERT
PRC
PONT OF REVERSE CURVE
NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR:
UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON AS PROPOSED' MAY INFACT BE EXISTING
AT THE TIME OF THIS CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
DETERMINE iF ANY 'FUTURE OR PROPOSED' UTILITY HAS BEEN
CONSTRUCTED.
NE
OF BAS^1JtiE AVENUE BEING N89'SB'41'TY A5 SHOWN ON RECORD
OF SURVEY 88/78-03.
�FESS
BENCH MARK No. 72 2SSSIVDTWH BY
TOP REINFORCING ROO IN FLOC) Lv�a s
Fa
CONTROL RETAINING WALL SW COR � $ NMtJ d IXril Engireering - PlannLng - Surw6 ng - Pub% Woks DESIGNED 6
BANANA k FOOTHILL � H 24573 � 545 N. Mmm(D:n Ave. Ste. 105 Upland, CA 91786-9497- (909) 982-7777C''ke
¢ 67-5. , FTP. 12/31/01 CHECKED
ELEVATION E21A.E7Y* PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OR G. c Ra
OF CALF JOB NO.
ear 127
GP.APHC 1
CITY OF FONTANA, CALIFORNIA
STORM DRAIN PLANS SCALE:
TITLE SHEET HORIZ- AS HOTM
VERT: AS 1." ITED
FOR
DATE
TRACT NO. 15989 12/C12/W
PTA
w
LEGEND
-- SUBAREA BOUNDARY
9 E HIDROLOGIC SUBAREA
Tj - SUBAREA SIZE
1-I MAINLINE HYDROLOGIC NODE
0 -19 100 YEAR DISCHARGE AT NODE (CFS)
TIME OF CONCENTRATION (MINUTES)
WYnPnI nAY TART F ninn
AREA d AREA Q. SUM 'Q"
ST -1
0.8
3.20
81.3
A
5,5
13.97
17.17
ST -1
1.0
4.07
21.24
8
1.9
5.26
26.50
C
4 1
11.43
1 37.93
moor Ha & I Dreman, Inc.
Nori Clod Engineering • Planning • Surveying • Public Works
N^ 24573 \} 545 11. kluunlain Ave. Sle. 106 Upland, CA 91786-9997 •(909) 982-7777
l PREPARLD UNDER THE SUPEROSION OF
CIVIL
st c
Ey AUN
REVISIONS .pv'H'iRjy.l a«q Ary AI O«� = -_ �/ Rifliilill L ITONUAtI RCF i73 OaTE
NODE DATA TABLE
NODE d
ELEV.
DIST. TO
NFXTNODr
100
81.3
520'
101
77.0
590'
102
67.8
400'
103
65.16
52'
104
53.8
38'
105
57.5
I11'
106
54.6
-
.o' u w w o'
GIADIAC SCALE 1'.W
CITY
OF FONTANA,
CALIFORNIA
:iRA
HYDROLOGY MAP
SCALE.
.F 11. ,
C.F
FOR
HORIZ: 1'
OES(G)IHO BY
VERT' I' a'
TRACT NO. 15957
CHECKED BY
DATE:,17/98
JOB N0.
JDR. N0.
ISHL NO.
1 Or I