Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDay, Etiwanda and San Sevaine Creek With the exception of the Day Creek Basin immediately south of Highland Avenue, basin storage of flood flows was not considered for the ultimate design on the Day Creek Channel System. Wine - ville and Riverside Basins will be used to some degree for flood flow storage in the early phases of channel construction. In the San Sevaine Creek Channel System, the Lower San Sevaine Basin and Jurupa Basin were used as flood storage basins. Lower San Sevaine Basin is designed as a flow- through basin and Jurupa Basin is designed as a by -pass system. Design flows were reduced below these basins based on analysis and coordination with the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, and the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. Tabulation of channel design flows by reach for each system are given in Section II. The Drainage Plan and hydrology map show the watershed area, design flows, and basin storage values. Figure No. 1 shows schematically the location of the proposed basins. HYDRAULIC DESIGN CRITERIA The design flow for the flood control systems described herein is based on a 100 -year frequency storm. The hydraulic design criteria is described in detail in Section III. In general, hydraulic methods and design criteria used in developing the preliminary plans were based on the Los Angeles County Flood Control District's experiences and practices, and is recommended herein. Water surface profile calculations for final design plans should be calculated using the Bernovilli energy equation combined with the momentum equation for analyzing confluences and junctions. A three foot (3') freeboard was used for the channel design where the flow velocity was 35 feet per second or more. A two foot (2') vi 3. UNIT - HYDROGRAPH PEAK FLOW RATES For ready reference, the peak flow rate estimates at certain selected points are tabulated below. The design flow is based on a 100 -year frequency, 24 -hour storm. Table No. 1 DAY CREEK SYSTEM Watershed Location Design Flow Point General 24 -hour Storm Number * Description Q100 (cfs) ** 1 Day Creek Canyon Mouth 5,310 2 Highland Avenue 6,214 3 Devore Freeway 7,375 4 San Bernardino Freeway 8,156 6 Wineville Basin 9,260 8 Riverside Basin 9,718 // A 45--- A 11 I \ 40— I 11 1 \ 35 -- 1 1 1 1 - ---- 1 SQUARE MILE WATERSHED 1 I 30— 25 SQUARE MILE WATERSHED 1 I 60 SQUARE MILE WATERSHED 1 I 1 1 25— I I� � � I 0 f' 'i I I . Li c r 2 0 — � 1 I z i 1 I J J /ij J z 15— Q • J I `� 1 / I 1 0 - 9 /! 5— \•• \,../ I 1 \ / .1 I I r --., • , , \ , .....____„... 0 I +/ I 1 1 f 1 O► O 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 TIME ( MINUTES) FIGURE 8. OCEMA CRITICAL STORM PATTERN AS A FUNCTION OF WATERSHED AREA