The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About4.4 Geotech Engineer & Report PROJECT NAME C'~y o', "FOt.Tg~r->~'.j.~i~.~(lC".2/T-~.) X.~,.( 5Tb-~L ()(LOlLall- PROJECT NO. I DATE ~ ~/fF SAMPLE LOCATION ~?~'~ DEPTH 'tO'/~r TECHNICIAN TEST' PROCEDURE 50,.,.,,,, ~ $ AST~ DESIGNATION D1557-91 D D698-91 D I METHOD ~ ~ AASHTO T180-86 METHOD C (MODIFIED) D OVERSIZE CORRECTION : ~ ; MAXIMUM PARTICLE SIZE NO. 4 D ~.....~.,..,.~, vo~u.~ o~ .o~o ,/so ~ ~/,s.ss TYPE OF RAMME~ MANUAL D MECHANICAL SOiL + MOLD ~ ~qG~ D~O ~OtO ~ AS ~ i ~ MOLD TARE "ZO~ ~6t~ 20~ 2~ ~0~ REC'D .... F''''''i''''''j SOIL WET I~ ~ J~]] (~?, I ~ [~?~ MOIST ) : : , WET DENSITY I~1, ( I~,1 IgZ,~ I~/,//z~,~ CONTENT 140): ~ ; : CAN NUMBER ~1 }~ ~ ~ Zt ~ DRY + TARE ~,~ ~,~ ~2~,~ ~7~t~ = ~ i ~ i = LOBS 11,(~ 1~',~.7 ~t,~ ~,~ i.......L.....~.......L.,.~.....i TARE )3.D 3~'~ ~.~ ~H.~ 135~'"~""~"'~""~"'~""]' DRY SOIL ~1,~ ~1,~,~ ~ ...... )"""'h""")"""'~j"""{" % MOISTURE ~, p ~, ~ ~, ~ /~, ~ 1 ....... ~"""'~"""'~"""'~i~ DRY DENSITY IIf,~//~,~i7,~ lt~,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ROCK CONTEN ~,~ ~.~ ........ r""'T"""r"""~ ...... j .... ~ WEIGHT OF TOTAL SAMPLE ~ 3o~..,~....~...~....~... : ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PLUS 3" WT. ~....j.......~,.....L.....: ......: = " PLUS 3/4" WT ~, F'"T""T""T"""~ :'""T"'"T"""[ ~ P~us 3/a" ~. ~, f ~,~ ~ s , o :.......,......,.._...,.......~ ......: = , : P~us.o.~ wT. ?'~rZ~ ~25~...j. ~ ~ ,:: [""""""""""""""""" P~US 3/4" WT. __ . i ~ ~ : ~ ~ :. PLUS NO.4 WT . ...,,.....?-....~.....~.... ~......~.......~.... ~...~., ~2o~..."...~...~....~...i....~-..;....:,...~...~ .........z~o A~ vo~d~ ~"'~"T"'~""7~"':' '~' =:~=~.~o ~ ~ 5~ .......~ ...~,.,.~.. G=2.50 : : : ~ : :~ : ~ ~ OVERSIZE ~CORRECTION · ,. ~.~ .= .. j, .,......, .,..,~. ' ~ I ~, :..~......:.. :.... ~......~...; .............,~,~, .... ,""'r""~""':"i"'~"'~""~""~ :. :~o~,,~..o,~.~ ~-~ ,~o,::'~""'S"""'~"""~ r":,"":.""~"~ .........'/""':":', , 0 5 10 15 20 MOISTURE CONTENT (PERCENT OF DRY WEIGHT) AGGREGATE PROJECT NAME PROJECT NUMBER SAMPLE ,..r OVEN DRY WEIGHT A. Z,"7/, "'7 SATURATED, SURFACE DRY B. ~E~s1, f SATURATED, SUBMERGED C. ~' G TARE BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY _ A _ Z.~,~. B-C BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY _ B _ B-C (SATURATED SURFACE DRY BASIS) A APPARENT SPECIFIC GRAVITY - - A-C ABSORPTION _ B-A x 1 O0 = /. I A B:GRAVITY.DWG J '- 'v' O,,,Z_RSIZE CORRECTION DATA PROJECT NAME Fc,u-w-~. PROJECT NUMBER ,.u ~rh ,~ s~ ~,.~ DEPTH 1~ '/~" SAMPLE TECHNICIAN ~ DATE A. % MOISTUTE, FINER FRACTION B. % MOISTURE, COARSE FRACTION C. WET WT., FINER FRACTION D. WET WT., COARSE FRACTION E. DRY WT., FINER F,RACTION F. DRY WT., COARSE FRACTION G. % FINER FRACTION H. % COARSE FRACTION I. SPECIFIC GRAVITY J. MAXIMUM DENSITY K. OPTIMUM MOISTURE E = C~ ('i +A--A- 'iO0 ) e --- E.4- (E+F)xlO0 F = D-,'--(1+ B I"GO') H --- F-~-(E+F)xlO0 '~OOxJxlx62.4 I?___ ,t--f,~'' CORRECTED (KxG~ + (BxH~ ~o'~ % CORRECTED (jxH)+(ix62.4xO)= pcf MAXIMUI,/{ 1 O0 = MOIS'CURE DENSITY FIELD USE ONLY CORREC'TED DENSITY CORRECTED (100xFIELD MOISTURE)-(BxH) FIELD = MOISTURE I~T'e,~,_ MAXIMUM DENSITY TEST DATA PROJECT NAME ,,~,,,-,,,~i~-~-,~-,~,AJ r~.. ~,.,.~ ~,~ PROjEC~ NO. DATE~./~ 5AMPLE LOCATION/~/~ DEPTH ~/~ TECHNICTAN SOIL DESCRIPTION 52' 'S"/c,-~.',r' ~ ~K/C.,~. ~O-L TEST PROCEDURE 150 ........ : ~ ASTM DESIGNATION D1557-gl ['~ D698-91 [] METHOD ~" i i AASHTO T180-86 METHOD C (MODIFIED) [] OVERSIZE CORRECTION [~' MAXIMUM PARTICLE SIZE NO. 4 [] Z~/8" [] TYPE OF RAMMEN MANUAL [] MECHANICAL i""'~"""'?" METHOD OF SAMPLE PREPARATION DRY I~L MOIST [] ~ 45.L..:....~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ SOIL + MOLD ~)~ I1~ It~ AS j : ~ ~ ~OLD TARE ~45~ ~$'~ ~4~ REC'D 140[ [ ~ [ [ CAN NUMBER 1 ~_ ~ :~:. .....p....~..-...~.. ~ ' ' ' ROCK CONTENT ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ WEIGHT OF TOTAL SAMPLE ~'/'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ ~ ~ PLUS ~" WT. ..... ~.'.'..~".'..'~"*""~ ...... PLUS 3/4" WT ..... .................... ' = .... 'i ~ : : ~ PLUS NO,4 WT. Z~ '; S ....... ~......~-.....T....i.I~:~,~ ' PLUS 3/4" WT, ~" ': "i"" ] ~" ~"~~ ~ ~ PLUS HO,4 WT · . ~ : : : 12o~,,,:,,,,~,,,: ........' Zero ATr Vold~ Cu~es TEST :RESULTS ~...~ ..... ~...,~ ..:,. :...: ..... ~, :...~ ....................... ~ 0=2,80 MAXIMUM DENSflY ~ ....~....~...,,: ........... .......~: .. G=2.6o : 5 : ~ OVERSIZE: CORRECTION : .........................:' ~ ...... MAXIMUM DENSliTY ~ ~ OPTIMUM MOISTURE :..,,,.,: .......~.~. .......,..:....~...: .....~ ~ 0 5 10 15 20 MOISTURE CONTENT (PERCENT OF DRY WEIGHT) -- AGGREGAT E PROJECT NAME ~rrY o~ PROJECT NUMBER SAMPLE ~ TECHNICIAN ~' DATE ~// OVEN DRY WEIGHT A. /~ od::>,: ~ SATURATED, SURFACE DRY B. SATURATED, SUBMERGED C. /~e b TARE BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY = A = B-C' ~.,(.,,,t:::p B BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY ' B-C ' ?-,G, 't (SATURATED SURFACE DRY BASIS) A APPARENT SPECIFIC GRAVITY- - A-C ABSORPTION ' A x 1 O0 = /, '¢ B:GRAVITY.DWG .- q ERSIZE CORRECTION DATA PROJECT NAME PROJECT NUMBER ,.., _.k"r,P Io.~ SAMPLE ,' TECHNICIAN t'z""""' DATE A. % MOISTUTE, FINER FRACTION B. % MOISTURE, COARSE FRACTION C. WET WT., FINER FRACTION D. WET WT., COARSE FRACTION E. DRY WT., FINER FRACTION F. DRY WT., COARSE FRACTION G. % FINER FRACTION H. % COARSE FRACTI.ON I. SPECIFIC GRAVITY J. MAXIMUM DENSITY K. OPTIMUM MOISTURE E = C"'~- (1+l-e--d-O) S = E-;- (E+F)xlO0 F = D~-(1+10--~) H = F,'---(E+F)xlO0 100xJxlx62.4 l t_..k~,,p,upcf CORRECTED (KxG~ + (axH~ 5,~::~ % CORRECTED (jxH)+(Ix62.4xG)= MAXIMUM 1 O0 = MOISTURE DENSITY FIELD USE ONLY CORREC'TED FIELD DENSITYx Ix62.4xG FIELD = (lOOxlx62.4)-(FIELD DENSITYxH) DENSITY CORRECTED 100xFIELD MOISTURE)-(B×H) FIELD = G MOISTURE b:corrdoto,dwg MAXIMUM DENSITY TEST DATA PROJECT NAMEC't1't/bFF"d~PI~ ,JS~,.qfr~rr.,fi,,J t./'L.9~-'Jt"~. ~'- PROJECT NO. Za°~46'O DATE ~FSAMPLE LOCATION SOIL DESCRIPTION TEST PROCEDURE 150 ........ ASTM DESIGNATION D1557-91 [] D698-91 [] METHOD AASNTO T180-86 METHOD C (MODIFIED) [] OVERSIZE CORRECTION [] MAXIMUM PARTICLE SIZE NO..4 Q 3/8" ED ~/,4"[] VOLUME OF MOLD 1/30 J~] 1/13,33= []/tH~,L. TYPE OF RAMMER MANUAL D MECHANICAL Ga ' METHOD OP SAMPLE PREPARATION DRY ~ MOIST D 145~ ........~ ... ~ ~ o SOIL + .OLD 7~D?l//Za ~tl/eTJ I AS WET DENSITY j/~. (1139, F113~'. ~ ]"'~ ........... T"'~""~ DRY + ~ARE ~)~,~ S2~,~ ] :' ~""~ "" ~ TARE /~, f ~ ~""Z ~ ROCK CON~T ~ TOTAL SAMPLE ~ ' ~ ~ ~ : WEIGHT OF ' ' ~ .... : ......... ]..: PLUS ~'" W~. ~ ~..~. ,. ~.us s/~" wT 5'.~. WEIGHT Or ADJUSTED SAMPLE ~ PLUS 3/4" WT. __ : : PLUS NO.4 WT . 120~ .......................................... ~ ....... Zero Air Voids Cu~es TEST' RESULTS s=2.7o ~,~ 0=2.60 OPTIMUM 115~ ..................... 0=2.50 , OVERSIZE CORRECTION MAXI~U~ DENSITY OPTIMUM MOISTURE 110~ ......... 0 5 10 15 20 MOISTURE CONTENT (PERCENT OF DRY WEIGHT) I:.,,~,t,,.D~c ---, AGGREGATE PROJECT NAME PROJECT NUMBER /_., / .~ b"T',~,/'~r'~"0 ~o,D,_._ DEPTH /d2/._C' SAMPLE ,T T E C H N ICIA N ,,~,f-~ OVEN DRY WEIGHT A. 1'71~,.~ SATURATED, SURFACE DRY B. I SATURATED, SUBMERGED C. I ~ ~E, "'2 TARE A BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY ' B-C ' Z ' G~ 0 B BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY ' B-C ' (SATURATED SURFACE DRY BASIS) APPARENT SPECIFIC GRAVITY = A _ A-C % ABSORPTION_B-A x 100 =/, ~" A 8:GRAVITY.DWG C~ERSIZE CORRECTION DATA PROJECT NAME ~-.,Ty ~ T=~'',al:'b''l''Jl~ PROJECT NUMBER ,, ~-rf,. ,c,-~c~e ~a'?_..-- DEPTH SAMPLE ~r TECHNICIAN ~ DATE e//e/'~"' A. % MOISTUTE, FINER FRACTION B. % MOISTURE, COARSE FRACTION )' C. WET WT., FINER FRACTION D. WET WT., COARSE FRACTION E. DRY WT., FINER FRACTION F. DRY WT., COARSE FRACTION G. % FINER FRACTION H. % COARSE FRACTION I. SPECIFIC .GRAVITY 2_---, J. MAXIMUM DENSITY I~ K. OPTIMUM MOISTURE ~,, E = Ce o+re-c) o = E-C-' (E+r)×~oo OOxJxlx62.4 CORRECTED {KxO~ + (axH) "~¢ MOIS'TURE (j1xH)+(ix62.4xG)= r'~,q-,fi pcf MAXIMUM 100 = ! % CORRECTED DENSITY FIELD USE ONLY CORREC'TED FIELD DENSITYx 1×62.4xG FIELD = (lOOxlx62.4)-(FIELD DENSiTYxH) DENSITY CORRECTED 100xFIELD MOISTURE)-(BxH) FIELD = O MOISTURE ~:corrdoto.dwg PROJECT NAME ,,,.,x'.C~-!'/-~r'.,,,--.' '."",2. ;~-::".'.,-~-.~' ~:~"~'I PROJECT NO. DATE ~,,~'/~.F" SAMPLE LOCATION ,'r_~ ~ ~ DEPTH ~.'7~; ' TECHNICIAN SOIL DESCRIPTION ~ 12 . ~ I -/ r'- i - P,~ ~' ~,P-~ w/~/L TEST PROCEDURE 150 ........ · : ASTM DESIGNATION D1557-91 [;3 D698-91 i'l METHOD ! ~ AASHTO T180-86 METHOD C (MODIFIED) [::] OVERSIZE CORRECTION [~, MAXIMUM PARTICLE SIZE NO. 4 C] 3/8' r"l $/A",~, TYPE OF RAMMER MANUAL ['l MECHANICAL ~ )"""'t"""') METHOD Or $AMPLE PREPARATION DRY J~. MOIST ! i i i ! CAN NUMBER ,.~ '2_ ! ] ~ j j LOSS 'eY,//~/.~ 7~,~' 5 DRY DENSITY ,$4,,,.~ IJ~, q ~ ~ ~ ~ ROCK CONTENT PLUS 3/4" WT ~zs!...i..--:...!....~..~. ~....i! : : : ~ ~ · ,' : E j WEIGHT OF ADJUSTED SAMPLE 120~. ............ ~ ..................... ........4. ........ Zero Air Voids Curves TEST R;ESULTS G=2.50 ~ ~5.';...-.-.--.~ ........!. .. ' , : : ~ OVERSIZE CORRECTION i ...............;. .......i .......: ....."MA×,MUM OENS, OPTIMUM MOISTURE' 110| .......... 0 lO iS 20 MOISTURE CONTENT (PERCENT OF DRY WEIGHT) -- : ' Ab' REGATE PROJECT NAME c,7'V oc ~=,~'tf..-,,j,~ PROJECT NUMBER z-oo~,,~a-ot SAMPLE ~ ~ ~*~ DEPTH ~-/~ TECHNICIAN ~' DATE ~7/~/~ ~ OVEN DRY WEIGHT A. /& oo, ,~' SATURATED, SURFACE DRY B. SATURATED, SUBMERGED C. /aa~,, ~ TARE BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY ,_. A _ B-C B BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY - - .z,c, .~- B-C (SATURATED SURFACE DRY A APPARENT SPECIFIC GRAVITY - - A-C B-A % ABSORPTION ' A x 1 O0 = /, ¢' ~:GRAVITY.DWG ' CORRECTION DATA PROJECT NAME PROJECT NUMBER ,, _..%-r~. SAMPLE tr TECHNICIAN ~ DATE e'//-r'J'~ ~'' A. % MOISTUTE, FINER FRACTION 8. % MOISTURE, COARSE FRACTION C. WET WT., FINER FRACTION D. WET WT., COARSE FRACTION E. DRY WT., FINER F~RACTION F. DRY WT., COARSE FRACTION G. % FINER FRACTION H. % COARSE FRACTION I. SPECIFIC GRAVITY J. MAXIMUM DENSITY K. OPTIMUM MOISTURE E = c~ o+re-d-) o = E~ (E+F)×~OO F = D~--(1+1--~) H = F,=''' (E+F)xl00 lOOxJxlx62.4 1~.~.3C, cf CORRECTED (KxG~ + (BxH~ 5,~:~,% CORRECTED (JxH)+(.Ix62.4xG)= MAXIMUM 100 = MOISTURE DENSITY FIELD USE ONLY FIELD = (10 2 YxH) DENSITY CORRECTED (IOOxFIELD MOISTURE)-(BxH) FIELD = G MOISTURE ::corrdoto.Mwg PROJECT NAME~FynFFC~--TFNJI~ v-}A,c~nor~r~J ~;rc,~EoJ~"~ ~, PROJECT NO. ZaO~4G-O DATE ~FSAMPLE LOCATION ~T~ IO~&O DEPTH I~L I~" TECHNICIAN SOIL DESCRIPTION TEST PROCEDURE 50 ........ ASTM DESIGNATION D1557-91 ~ "', D698-91 0 ~ETHOD AASHTO T180-86 METHOD C (MODIFIED) ~ ~ OVERSIZE CORRECTION MAXIMUM PARTICLE SIZE NO, 4 D 3/8" Q ~/~"~ VOLUME OF MOLD 1/30 D 1/13.3~ ~/~.~ TYPE OF RAMMER MANUAL Q ~ECHANIGAL ~ ~ETHOD OF SAMPLE PREPARATION D~Y ~ MOIST ~ SOIL WET 7~ 1~TJ"~i~t~ .OIST WET DENSITY/~ ~. ~j/3t rj/2J'. ~ CONTENT j"."""F"'~""r'~~,~ + ,~,~ ~.o s~.~ { ": ..........~ ........~ LOSS g~,~ Z~,~ ~ss~ ........;...: ........]....,: DRY SO~L 4~,~/~,~ ~/~,f = ~ · , ~ : ~":""~ .......i"' DRY O~.si~ t~-5 ~5/,~ ~,/ J =~o~..., ........,..-.. w~l~Ht Or TOTAL S~UPLE ~" ~'; Lb~ · :: :'7:::7.....:: :.:,~, ~/,-~ f.~, i z.~. ~ PLus 3/8" '~. I~. ,~~ ~ =j..,:,.=====================~ ,0.,.. ~ ~ .3~ WEIGNT OF ADJUSTED PLUS 3/4" WT. PLUS NO.4 wT ~2o ..........................................., ....... Zero ~ vo;ds Cu~e. TEST RESULTS G=2.80 MAXIMUM DENSITY I~ ~=z.~o ~ " G=2.60 OPTIMUM MOISTURE 15) .....................: .....................~ ............. G=2.50 ~ OVERSIZE CORRECTION ] MAXIMUM DENSITY ~ OPTIMUM 110' 0 5 10 15 20 MOISTUR{ CONTENT (PERCENT OF DRY WEIGHT) m..,:,,~. .~. -- A~;REGATE: PROJECT NAME C/5'>/Or/ PROJECT NUMBER / / SAMPLE ~ S~, {~ DEPTH T E C H N ICIA N ~ [6 DATE OVEN DRY WEIGHT A. 1'7/'%...~ SATURATED, SURFACE DRY B. /"24'~',~ SATURATED, SUBMERGED C. TARE BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY _ A _ B-C B BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY ' B-C ' (SATURATED SURFACE DRY ,_.'-.SIS) APPARENT SPECIFIC GRAVITY - A _ A-C ABSORPTION = B-A x 100 = J,~" A ~:GRAVITY.DwG OV~',RSIZE ., ~ CORR~f~TION DATA PROJECT NAME PROJECT NUMBER SAMPLE '~ ~"r-A. TECHNICIAN ~-z.z___ DATE A. % MOISTUTE, FINER FRACTION B. % MOISTURE, COARSE FRACTION C. WET WT., RNER FRACTION D. WET WT,, COARSE FRACTION E. DRY WT., FINER FRACTION F. DRY WT., COARSE FRACTION G. % FINER FRACTION H. % COARSE FRACTION I. SPECIFIC .GRAVITY J. MAXIMUM DENSITY K. OPTIMUM MOISTURE E = C"~- (l+l-e"O-) G = E'-4- (E+F)xlO0 ,, r = D-f- (',+f-~-~-)H = F+ (E+F),dO0 r 100xJxlx62.4 _ U'~,,~r.~ CORRECTED (KxO~ + (gxh~ "~¢ MOISTURE ,JxH)+(Ix62.4xG)' pcf MAXIMUM 100 = ~% CORRECTED DENSITY FIELD USE ONLY FIELD = ( 0 2 I YxH) DENSITY CORRECTED (IO0xFIELD MOISTURE)-(BxH) FIELD = O UOISTURE Please R~mi[ Payments to Ni~o & Moore Corpo~[e Accounting: 10225 ~rnes Canyon Road · Suite A-112 · San Diego, Cali~rnia 92121 Pb~e 1619/457-0400 · Fax 1619) 558-I236 Invoice number 4597 September l, 1995 Page number Project No. 200646.01 - Waehington Drive Sewer Projec~ Client No. SB-71-94, P.O. No.'B§52~3~' CITY OF FONTANA 8353 SIERRA AVE. ~L.~. V NTANA, CA 2ss4-os s ATTN: MR. YOUSUF PATANWALA , Invoice through September 1, 1995, for geotechnical consult~ng.~servic%~/ pertaining to the Washington Drive sewer project in Fontand, Californi = Our services have included project data compil~tion and analysis and preparation of our report dated August 31, 1995., PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Hours, Rate Amount PRIMC/PA~ ENGINEER/GEOLOGIST .~ASA5 VAKILI REPORT pREPARATION 9-0~-95 ~.00 84.00 84.00 PROJECT ENGINEER/GEOLOGIST ..... "- KURT S. YOSMII DATA.COMPILATION & ANALYSIS '- "-. 8-04-95 ~.50 74.00 111.00 "9-01-95 ~.00 74.00 74.00 REPORT PREPARATION 9-01-95 3.50 74.00 259.00 ERICK J. ALDRICH DATA COMPILATION & ANALYSIS 9-01-95 2.00 62.00 ~24.00 TECHNICAL ILLUSTRATOR LASZLO ROZGONYI TECNNICAL ILLUSTRATING 9-0~-95 1.00 39.00 39.00 ~RIO O. AQUINO TECHNICAL iLLUSTRATING 8'04'95 2.50 39 00 97 50 *DATES SHOWN REFLECT END OF BILLING WEEK PLEASE RETURN WITH PAYMENT Please Remi~ Payments to Ninyo ~ Moore Corporate Accounting: 10225 Barnes Canyon Road · SuiteA-ll2 · SanDiego, California 92121 Invoice number 45979 Phone ~619) 457-0400, · Fax (619) 558-1236 September 1, 1995 Pa~e number 2 Project No. ~00646.O1 - Washington Drive Sewer Projec~ ~ , ~<-~{ ===================== 'v 2T ~ORD PROCESSING/REPRODUCTION ANNEMIEKE VALKENHOFF ~ORD PROCESSIHG ~: ' ('~> 40. B0 ~Z 9-01-9B .50 27.00 " MARY ELAINE HEBNER RE PRODUCT I ON 9-0~-95 .50 27.00 13.50 WANDA G. HAMILTON WORD PROCESSING 9-0~-95 .50 ~7.00 13.50 · '*THIS( I~OlCl ~TAL,'*~ ,:. ,,sSa~- PREVIOUS UNPAID INVOICES: Number Date ~ount · OTAL PRRVIOUS INVOICES: 4,424.00 · *~O~AL BALANC~ DU~***: 5 ~ ~07.00 . -. ~; :L:4-;, ;,'~ >$~ ~..+, , ~.~'~:'~:;~d,'';>h~r~''''''- Aged Receivables Current 31-60 days 61-90 days 91-120 days 121+ days 5~307.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 5,307.00 *DATES SHOWN REFLECT END OF BILLING WEEK PLEASE RETURN WITH PAYMENT · San Diego · I~ine · San Berna~dino Please Remi~ P~ments ~o Ni~o & Moore Cotporte Accounting: 10225 Barnes CaWon Road , Suite A - I M 2 · San Diego, Cali~rnia 92121 Invoice number 45646 Ph°ne16%9}457'O400·Fax(619) BSSLI236 July 28, 1995 Page number Project No. 200646.01 - Washington Drive Sewer Project' Client No. SB-71-94, P.O. No. ]9525343 CITY OF FONTANA 8353 SIERRA AVE. ~ FONTANA, CA 92334-0518 CF ATTN: MR. YOUSUF PATANWALA ~ Progress invoice through July 28, 1995, for geotechnical. consulting services pertaining to the Washington Drive sewer project in Fontana,' California. Our services have included project coordination and planning, laboratory testing of bulk soil samples, in-place density testing of the compacted fill and sewer trench backfill material. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Hours* Rate Amount PROJECT ENGINEER/GEOLOGIST KURT S. YOSHII COORDINATION/PLANNING/LIAISON 6-30-95 10.75 74.00 795.50' 7-07-95 .75 74,00 55.50 7-14-95 .50 74.00 37.00 7-28-95 ~ .25 74.00 18.50 RAI.UNDo L. CSRESO LABORATOR~ T~STING ~( ~ 13.50 42 00 567 00 ?-21-95 ~ · · SENIOR T~CHNICIAN FERNANDO ~UIRO~ FIELD SERVICES 6-30-95 32.00 42.00 ~,344.00 ?-0?-95 23.00 42.00 966.00 ?-28-95 4.00 42.00 168.00 DATA COHPILATIO~ & ANALYSIS 6-30-95 2.50 42.00 105.00 WORD ~ROCeSSI~G/REPRODOC~I~ 0BIGINAL C~NTHIA DUENAS YKIUPL~,~;"E woRD PROCESSING [] COP 6-30-95 AUG 18 L=~+'~ .50 'T7.00 13.50 ACC0UNTSPAYABLE · DATES SHOWN REFLECT END OF BILLING WEEK Please Remit Paymen~ co Ni~o & Moore Corporate Accounting: 0225 Barnes Ca~on Road · ~uice A- I 12 · 5an Oiego, Cafi~mia 92 i 21 Invoice number 456~6 P~°ne16rg)~ST'O~OO'Fax(~lg)558"1236 ~Uly 28, 1995 Page number 2 Project No. 200646.0~ - Washington Drive Sewer Project REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT CHARGE 6-30-95 FQ 32 Hours @ 6.00 192.00 7-07-95 FQ 23 Hours @ 6.00 138.00 7-28-95 FQ 4 Hours @ 6.00 24.00 · **THis INVOICE TOTAL***: PREVIOUS UNPAID INVOICES: Number Date Amount Invoice 45335 6-23-95 2,596.23 TOTAL PREVIOUS INVOICES: 2,596.23~ ........... · **TOTAL BALANCE DUE***: -7,020.25 Aged Receivables Current 31-60 days 61-90 days 91-120 days 121+ days Total 7,020.23 .00 .00 .00 .00 7,020.23 ,DATES SHOWN REFLECT END OF BILLING WEEK ~ °~ ~°"~ PRIORITY I~EMOi~,,,'4'DUM TO= Accounts Payable FROM: Originating Department SUBJECT: PACKING SLIPS DATE: All items on the attached invoice were authorized to be ordered and have been received. Therefore, payment is hereby authorized to be made. P.O. # F.P.O. # Invoice # Account # ApproVed 'by Reviewed by Date Attachment ds Please Remit Payments to Ninyo & Moore Corporate Accounting: 10225 Barnes Canyon Road · SuiteA-112 · San Diego, Cali~rnia 92121 Phone1619) 457-0400 · Fax[61g) SBB-1236 Invoice number 45335 June 23, 1995 Page number 1 Brojeet No. 200646.01 - Washington Drive Sewer Project C]isnt No. SB-71-94, B.C. No. B9525343 CITY OF FONTANA 8353 SIER~J~ AVE. : ....... :"~] FONTANA, CA 92334-0518 · JUL 2 01995 j ATTN: MR YOUSUF PATANWALA Brogre~8 i~oioe through ~une 23, 1995, ~or geoteehnioal consulting ~erviee8 ~erta~ning to the ~a~hLngton Drive sewer ~rojeet Ln ~ontana, CalL~ornia. Our ~erviee~ have ~nel~sa ~rojeet eoor~inatio~ a~ Laboratory te~ti~g o~ bul~ ~oil 8a~leB, Ln-~laee ~ensit~ te~ting o~ the eo~aete~, ~e~er trench bae~11 material, an~ ~r~aratLon o£ our ~ated June 21, 1995. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Hours, Rate Amount PROJECT ENGINEER/GEOLOGIST KURT S. YOSHII COORDINATION/PLANNING/LIAISON 6-16-95 2.25 74.00 166.50 6-23-95 6.00 74.00 444.00 MARK A. 8TIER COORDINATION/PLANNING/LIAISON 6-16-95 .50 74.00 37.00 SENIOR TECHNICIAN FERNANDO QUIROZ FIELD SERVICES 6-16-95 13.00 42.00 546.00 6-23-95 15.00 42.00 630.00 DATA COMPILATION & ANALYSIS 6-16-95 ........ 2.00 42.00 84.00 6-23-95 ]'~ '7~!~::q!~t 3.00 42.00 126.00 LABORATORY TESTING '~ 'b ;" ~ " 4.00 42.00 168.00 6-16-95 6-23-95 I 2.50 42.00 105.00 3UL 2 0 GUILLERMO MADRIGAL LABORATORY TESTING ~p~2'i~"~F~'(~'' 6-16-95 :j~"~ 'F" 1.50 42.00 63.00 *DATES SHOWN REFLECT END OF BILLING WEEK Please Remi[ Paymen[~ to N/nyo & Moore Corpora[e Accounting: 10225 Barnes Canyon Road · SuiteA4 12 · San Diego, Cali~rnia 92121 Phone(619) 457-0400 · Fax(619) 558-1236 Invoice number 45335 June 23, 1995 Page number 2 Project No. 200646.01 - Washington Drive Sewer Project PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Hours, Rate Amount WORD PROCESSING/REPRODUCTION JANICE O. HUGH WORD PROCESSING 6-23-95 .75 27.00 20.25 8ONJA Z. TUTTLE WORD PROCESSING 6-23-95 .25 27.00 6.75 OFFICE ASSISTANT MARY ELAINE NEBNER REPRODUCTION 6-23-95 .25 27.00 6.75 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT CHARGE 6-16-95 FQ 13 Hours @ 6.00 78.00 6-23-95 FQ 15 Hours @ 6.00 90.00 OUTSIDE REPRODUCTION 6-01-95 24.98 ***THIS INVOICE TOTAL***: 2,596.23 PREVIOUS UNPAID INVOICES: Number Date. Amount Invoice 44927 5-31-95 584.00 TOTAL PREVIOUS INVOICES: 584.00 ***TOTAL BALANCE DUE***: 3,180.23 Aged Receivables Current 31-60 days 61-90 days 91-120 days 121+ days Total 3,180.23 .00 .00 .00 .00 3,180.23 Please Remit Paymen~ to Ninyo & Moore CorDorate Accounting: 10225 Barnes Canyon Road . Suite A-I12 · San Diego, Caii~rn~a 92121 Phonei619) 45L0400 · Fax(619) 558-1236 Invoice number 44927 May 31, 1995 Page number 1 Project No. 200646.01 - Washington Drive Sewer Project Client No. SB-71-94, P.O. No~N0~9#525343 attendance at the pre-construction meeting on May 24, 1995, and a visit to the site. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Hours, Rate Amount PROJECT ENGINEER/GEOLOGIST KURT S. YOSHII FIELD SERVICES 5-26-95 1.00 74.00 74.00 CLIENT CONFERENCE 5-26-95 2.00 74.00 148.00 COORDINATION/PLANNING/LIAISON 5-26-95 3.25 74.00: 240.50 SENIOR TECHNICIAN FERNANDO QUIROZ CLIENT CONFERENCE 5-26-95 2.00 42.00 84.00 WORD PROCESSING/REPRODUCTION DONNA LEE MADRIGAL COORDINATION/PLANNING/LIAISON 5-26-95 .25 36.00 9.00 OFFICE ASSISTANT MARY ELAINE HEBNER COORDINATION/PLANNING/LIAISON 5-26-95 .50 27.00 13.50 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT CHARGE 5-26-95 KSY 2.5 Hours @ 6.00 15.00 ***THIS INVOICE TOTAL***: 584.00 *DATES SHOWN REFLECT END OF BILLING WEEK ~ ' Geot~hnical and Environmental Sciences Consu~n~ Please Remit Payments [o Ninyo & Moore Corporate Accounting: 10225 Barnes CaWon Road · Suite A-112 · San Diego, California 92 Invoice number 45335 Phone(619) 457-O400.Fax[619)558-1236 June 23, 1995 Page number 1 PrOject No; 200646.01 - Washingtom Drive Sewer Project Client No..SB-71-94, P.O. No. B9525343 CITY OF FONTANA \t~, 8353 SIERRA AVE. ' ~'~ FONTANA, CA 92334-0518 ,~ ATTN: MR. YOUSUF PATANWALA ======================================================================= Progress invoice through June 23, 1995, for geotechnical consulting services pertaining to the Washington Drive sewer project in Fontaria, California. Our services have included project coordination and planning, laboratory testing of bulk soil samples, in-place density testing of the compacted, sewer trench backfill material, and preparation of our letter dated June 21, 1995. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Hours, Rate Amount PROJECT ENGINEER/GEOLOGIST KURT S. YOSHII COORDINATION/PLANNING/LIAISON 6-16-95 2.25 74.00 166.50 6-23-95 6.00 74.00 444.00 '-MARK A. STIER COORDINATION/PLANNING/LIAISON 6-16-95 .50 74.00 37.00 SENIOR TECHNICIAN FE~NANDO QUIROZ ........ ~' ~ ~'= " ~' ' FIELD SERVICES 6-16-95 13.00 42.00 546.00 6-23-95 15.00 42.00 630.00 DATA COMPILATION & ANALYSIS 6-16-95 2.00 42.00 84.00 6-23-95 3.00 42.00 126.00 LABORATORY TESTING 6-16-95 4.00 42.00 168,00 6-23-95 2.50 42.00 105.00 OUILL~RMO MADRIQA~ LABORATORY TESTING 6-16-95 1.50 42.00 63.00 *DATES SHOWN REFLECT END OF BILLING WEEK PLEASE RETURN WITH PAYMENT · Please Retail Paymen[s [o Ninyo & Moore Corpora[e Accounting: 10225 Barnes Ca~on Road · guile A - I 12 · San Diego, Cali~rnia Phone(619) 457-0400 · Fax(619) ESB-1236 Invoice number ~5335 June 23, ~995 Page number 2 Project No. 200646.01 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Hours, Rate Amoum~9~ WORD.PROCESSING/REPRODUCTION JANICE O. HUGH WORD PROCESSING SONJA Z. TUTTLE WORD PROCESSING 6-23-95 .25 27.00 6.75 OFFICE ASSISTANT MARY ELAINE REBNER REPRODUCTION 6-23-95 .25 27.00 6~75 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT CHARGE 6-16-95 FQ 13 Hours @ 6.00 78.00 6-23-95 FQ 15 Hours @ 6.00 90.00 ~ OUTSIDE REPRODUCTION '~ 6-01-95 ~ 24.98 · **THIS INVOICE TOTAL***: 2,596.23 PREV OUSU P IDi'NVOiCES: Invoice 44927 5-31-95 584.00 " TOTAL PREVIOUS INVOICES: 584.00 · **TOTAL BALANCE DUE***: 3,180.23 Aged Receivables Current 31-60 days 61-90 days 91-120 days 121+ days Total 3,180~23 .00 .00 .00 ~00 3,180.23 *DATES SHOWN REFLECT END OF BILLING WEEK AINNtlL.'. CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE ........... ,HIS CE.T..C.,. ,S ,SSU. AS A .A,,,. OF ,NFaMA,. % 'L AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DEALEY, RENT~ · AS$~. DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND QR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE 66 Jack London Square POLICIES BELOW. P.O. Box 12675 C~IES AFF~D~G COVeAGE Oak l ,nd, CA 94604-267S 510-465-3090 Americtn Automoblle Ins, Co. LE11B Ninyo & Moore, LETTER 102~5 B~rnes C~nyon Rd,SteA112 Sen Diego, CA 92121 LETT~ THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE ~L~ES~F~N~URANCE~TED~EL~HAVEBE~N~SUE~T~THE~NSU~E~NAM~DAB~VEF~T~Ep~L~CYpE~ INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDtNG ANY REQUIREMENT, TE~ OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOC~ENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIRCATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERT A N, THE N ;URANCE AFFORDED BY TIHE POL C ES DESCRBED HEREIN S SUBJECT TO ALL THE TE~S, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LNITS SHOWNMAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAMS. C~ERCIAL 8~NE~L tlABILITY ALL C~ERAGES SH~ PR00UCTS-C~P/OPA6G. ~CLAIMS ~0i~ OCCUR. ~ PRIOR CERTIFICATES PERS0NAt & AW. 0WN~R'S & CON1~CTOR'S PRQT. R~A I N I N FORCE EACH 0CC~RRENCE A~ AU~0 AND ARE $TILL VALID tIMIT .,. $CHEOULED AUTOS THIS IS TO SH~ (Per perso~ __ NQN-0WN~0AU[0S W~KER$ CIPENSATI~ (Per accident) RENEWAL "J'l "~RT~ X [ STATUTORY LI"I,TS A ~ WP8067~401 7/01195 7/01/96 EACH ACCIOENT t 1 ,OOO,OOO OlSEAS;-POLI~ UM~r t 1,000,00O EIO~liLffY DiSEASE-EACH EMPL~EE S 1.000 ,OOO RE: City of FontanD, its elected officials, officers, employees end agents are named as additional insured~ as respects general and auto Cper CAO001) SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 30 DAYSWRITTENNOTICETOTHECERTIFICATEHOLDERNAMEOTOTHE C i t y o f Font In a LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL MPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR Attn: Youluf Pantsnwa I a LIABILITYO~ ANYKINOUPONTHECOMPANY,ITSAGENTSORREPRESENTATIVES. Fontans, C. 92334-0518 39650000 CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT (hereinafter the "Agreement") is made this I~r day of D'u~E , 19q%', (the "Effective Date") by and between the CITY OF FONTANA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City"), and NinVo & Moore, Inc. (hereinafter the "Consultant"). The City and the Consultant are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as "Part " y and hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Parties." RECITALS A. The Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility and obligations for the services, as hereinafter described on the terms and conditions set forth herein. B. The City desires to contract for such services as hereinafter described on the terms and conditions set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutua~ covenants' and conditions contained herein, the City and the Consultant agree as follows: OPERATIVE PROVISIONS SECTION 1 ENGAGEMENT AND SERVICES OF THE CONSULTANT 1. En~aSement of Consultant. The City hereby engages the Consultant, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, to perform the services set forth in Exhibit "A" (the ,,Services"). The Consultant agrees to perform the Services in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 2. Performance of the Consultant. The Consultant accepts the relationship of trust and confidence established between the City and the Consultant by the terms of this Agreement. The Consultant covenants with the City to furnish its best skill, judgment and efforts and to cooperate with the City and any other consultants or contractors engaged by the City in the performance of th~ Services. The Consultant covenants to use its best efforts to perform its duties and obligations under this Agreement in an efficient, expeditious and economical manner, consistent with the best interests of the City. 3. The Consultant's Personnel. The Consultant shall provide adequate and experienced administrative and management personnel to perform the Services. 4. The Consultant's Responsibilities for Costs and Expenses. The Consultant shall be responsible for all costs and expenses incurred relative to the Consultant, personnel of the Consultant and subcontractors of the Consultant, in connection with the performance of the Services, including, without limitation, payment of salaries, fringe benefits contributions, payroll taxes, withholding taxes and other taxes or levies, office overhead expense, travel expenses, telephone and other telecommunication expenses, and document reproduction expenses. SECTION II RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CONSULTANT 1. Personnel. The Services shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision, The Consultant represents that it possesses the professional and technical personnel required to perform the Services. The City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and Consultant is not an employee of the City. The personnel performing the Services on behalf of the Consultant shall at all times be under the Consultant's exclusive direction and control. The Consultant shall pay all expenses including, without limitation, salaries, fringe benefit contributions, payroll taxes, withholding taxes and other taxes or levies and all other amounts due such personnel or due others as a result of the performance by such personnel of the Services in connection with their performance of the Services and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services. 2. Coo~eration/Pro~ect Administrator. Consultant shall work closely and cooperate fully with the City's designated Project Administrator, and any other agenci~es which may have jurisdiction or interest in the Services. This Agreement will be administered by the Project Administrator. The Project Administrator, or his/her designee, shall be the principaI officer of the City for liaison with the Consultant, and shall review and give approval to the details of the Services as they are performed. The City designates Robert W. Weddle, P.E., City EnGineer, as its Project Administrator, but reserves the right to appoint another person as Project Administrator upon written notice to the Consultant. 3. Pro~ect ManaGer. The Consultant shall designate and assign a pro~ect manager ("Project Manager"), who shall coordinate all phases of the Services. The Project Manager shall be available to the City at'all reasonable times. The Consultant designates _ k to be its Project Manager Tara S. Si h . 4. T~me of Performance. The Services to be performed by Consultant under and pursuant to this Agreement shall be completed as directed by the City's Project Administrator. 5. ReDoft Materials. At the completion of the Services, the Consultant shall deliver to the City all documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, naps, models, photographs, and 2 reports prepared by the Consultant orprepared by others for the use and/or benefit of the Consultant or otherwise provided to the Consultant by the City or by others under this Agreement (the "Report Materials"). The Report Materials shall be considered the property of the City and shall be delivered to the City upon the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 6. City Policy. The Consultant shall discuss and review all matters relating to the Services with the Project Administrator in advance of all critical decision points in order to ensure that the Services proceed in a manner consistent with the goals and policies of the City. 7. Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All aspects of the provision of the Services by Consultant shall at all times conform to applicable city, oounty, state, and federal requirements and be subject to approval of the. Project Administrator and City Council of the City. 8. Indemnification. -The Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees and agents against, and will hold and save them and each of them, harmless from any and all actions, claims, damages to persons or property, penalties, obligations or liabilities that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm, entity, corporation, political subdivision or other organization arising out of alleged negligent acts, errors or omissions in connection with the provision of the Services by the Consultant, operations or activities of the Consultant, its agents, employees or subcontractors provided for herein, whether or not there is concurrent negligence on the part of the City, its officers, agents or employees (but excluding such actions, claims, damages to persons or property, penalties, obligations, or liabilities arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its Council, agents, servants or independent contractors who are directly responsible to the City) and in connection therewith: A. The Consultant will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said claims, damages, penalties, obligations or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including attorney's fees incurred in connection therewith. B. The Consultant will promptly pay any judgment rendered against the Consultant or the City covering such claims, damages, penalties, obligations and liabilities arising out of negligent acts, errors or omissions in connection with such Services, operations, or activities of the Consultant hereunder; and the Consultant agrees to save and hold the City harmless therefrom. C. In the event the City is made a party to any action or proceeding filed or persecuted against the Consultant for such damages or other claims arising out of alleged negligance in connection with the work, operations or activities of the Consultant hereunder, the Consultant agrees to pay to the City any and all costs and expenses incurred by City in such actions or proceedings, together with reasonable attorneys' fees. 9. Standard of Care; Licenses. The Consultant represents and warrants that it and all personnel engaged in performing Services are and shall be fully qualified and are authorized or permitted under state and local law to perform such Services. The Consultant shall perform the Services in a skillful and competent manner. The Consultant shall be responsible to City for any errors or omissions in the execution of its duties under this Agreement and in the performance of its duties hereunder. The Consultant represents and warrants that it and all personnel engaged in performing the Services have all licenses, permits, qualifications, and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to practice its profession. The Consultant further represents and warrants that it shall keep in effect all such licenses, permits, and other approvals during the term of this Agreement. 10. Insurance. Without limiting the Consultant's indemnification of the City, the Consultant shall obtain and provide and maintain at its own expense during the term of this Agreement a policy or policies of liability insurance of the type and amounts described below and satisfactory to the City, in its sole discretion. Such policies shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf and must be filed with the City prior to exercising any right or performing the Services. Said policies, excepting professional liability, shall add as insureds the City, its elected officials, officers employees and agents for all liability arising from the Consultant's Services as described herein but will provide a Certificate of Insurance. A. Prior to the commencement of the Services, the Consultant shall provide to the City certificates of insurance with original endorsements, and copies of policies, if requested by the City, of the following insurance, with Best's Class B+VIII or better carriers: (1) Workers' compensation insurance covering all employees and principals of the Consultant, in a minimum amount of $1 million per accident, effective per the laws of the State of California; (2) Commercial general liability insurance covering third party liability risks, including without limitation contractual liability, in a minimum amount of $1 million combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. If commercial general liability insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate shall apply separately to this project, or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the occurrence limit; (3) Commercial auto liability and property insurance covering any owned and rented vehicles of Consultant in a minimum amount of $1 million combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (4) Professional liability insurance covering errors and omissions on the part of the Consultant, in a minimum amount of $1 million each occurrence and in the aggregate on an a claims made form. B. Said policy or policies shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior notice has been given in writing to the City. The Consultant shall give to the City prompt and timely notice of claim made or suit instituted arising out of the Consultant's operation hereunder. The Consultant shall also procure and maintain, at its own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its own judgment may be necessary for its proper protection and performance of the Services. C. The Consultant shall include subcontracting consultants, if any, as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverage for each subcontractor shall be subject to the requirements stated heroin. 11. Prohibition A~ainst Transfers. A. The Consultant shall not assign, sublease, hypothecate, or transfer this Agreement, or any interest therein, directly or indirectly by operation of law without the prior written consent of the City. Any attempt to do so without the prior written consent of the City shall be null and void, and any assignee, sublessee, hypothecatee or transferee shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation, or transfer. 5 B. The sale, a~signment, transfer, or other disposition of any of the issued and outstanding capital stock of the Consultant, if the Consultant is a corporation or of the interest of any general partner or joint venturer or syndicate member or co-tenant of the Consultant, if the Consultant is a partnership or a joint venture or a syndicate or a co-tenancy, which shall result in changing the control of the Consultant, shall be deemed an assignment of this Agreement. For purposes of this paragraph, "control" means the ownership of fiftypercent (50%) or more of the voting power of the corporation or fifty percent (504) or more of the voting power of a partnership, joint venture, syndicate or co-tenancy. 12. Progress. The Consultant is responsible to keep the Project Administrator and/or his/her duly authorized designee informed on a regular basis regarding the status and progress of the Services, activities performed and planned, and any meetings that have been scheduled or are desired relative to the Services or relative to this Agreement. 13. Confidentialitv. No news releases, including photographs, public announcements, or confirmations of the same, of any part of the subject matter of this Agreement or any phase of the Services shall be made without prior written consent of the City. The information which results from the Services in this Agreement is to be kept confidential unless the release of information is authorized by the City. 14. Scheduling, The Consultant shall generally have no obligation to work any particular schedule. Provided, the Consultant will coordinate with the City in achieving the results sought under the terms of this Agreement. 15. No Set Hours/Right to Contract. The Consultant's obligation hereunder is to complete the Services and to meet any deadlines set forth therein. The Consultant has no obligation to work any particular hours or days or any particular number of hours or days. In this regard, the Consultant retains the right to contract for similar Services with any other entity, public or private. 16. Results. The! City agrees that it will have no right to control or direct the details, manner or means by which the Consultant accomplishes the results of the Services performed hereunder. SECTION RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITY 1. Cooperation. The City shall cooperate with the Consultant relative to the provisions of the Services. SECTION IV COMPENSATION 1. Compensation. In consideration of the performance by the Consultant of the Services, the City shall pay to the Consultant the fees on a time and material basis as set forth on Exhibit "B" (the "Hourly Rate Schedule"), in a not to exceed amount of $20,000. 2 Extra Service. The Consultant shall not receive additional Compensation for any extra service unless such extra service has been authorized in writing by the City prior to the commencement of the extra service. The City shall pay the Consultant for extra service in accordance with the fee schedule set forth on Exhibit "B". 3. PaYment of Compensation. The Consultant shall submit invoices to the City on a monthly or on such other basis as set forth in Exhibit "B". Each invoice will be itemized. Each invoice shall show the number of hours worked per person/Consultant and the nature of the service performed. The City shall make payments to the Consultant within thirty {30) days following the date of receipt of the invoice unless the City disputes the amount of the Compensation the Consultant claims it is owed under this Agreement. 4. Withholding. A. Disputed Sums. The City may withhold payment of any portion of the Compensation if payment is disputed until resolution of the dispute with the Consultant. Such withholding by the City shall not be deemed to constitute a failure to pay by the City. The Consultant shall not discontinue the performance of the Services for a period of t2~irty (30) days from the date Compen- sation is withheld hereunder. The Consultant shall have an immediate right to appeal to the Mayor and the City Council with respect to withheld amounts. The determination of the Mayor and the City Council with respect to such matters shall be final. The Consultant shall be entitled[ to receive interest on any portions of the Compensation withheld which are thereafter deemed to be properly payable to the Consultant at the rate of seven percent (7%) per annum, simple interest. "B. Retention. The City shall have the right to re~ain an amount equal to ten percent (10%) of the Compensation ("Retention"). The City shall have the right without further liability to the Consultant, to utilize the Retention to satisfy obligations of the City relative to the Services in the event the Consultant does not complete the Services satisfactory to the City. 7 SECTION V EXPIPATION AND TERMINATION 1. Events of Default. Each of the following events shall constitute an "Event of Default": A. The Consultant shall fail to observe, perform or comply with any material term, covenant, agreement or condition of this Agreement which is to be observed, performed or complied with by the Consultant, if such failure to continue uncured for three (3) calendar days after the City gives the Consultant notice of any failure and specified the nature of such failure. B. The Consultant shall commit any fraud, misrep- resentation, breach of fiduciary duty, willful misconduct, or intentional or breach of any provision of this Agreement. 2. Termination Upon Event of Default. In addition to any other available legal or equitable rights or remedies, upon an Event of Default by the Consultant, the City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement upon written notice to the Consultant. 3. Expiration. This Agreement shall expire upon (a) the Completion Date, (b) full payment of the Compensation, or (c) one year from the effective date of the contract. 4. Payment Upon Termination. Upon a termination of this Agreement as provided in paragraph 2 of this Section, the City shall pay to the Consultant. the part of the Compensation which would otherwise be payable to the Consultant with respect to the Services which had been completed as of the date of termination, less the amount of all previous payments with respect to the Compensation. VI GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Nondiscrimination by the Consultant. The Consultant represents and agrees that the Consultant, its affiliates, subsid- iaries, or holding companies do not and will not discriminate against any subcontractor, consultant, employee, or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, sex, handicap, or national origin. Such nondiscrimination shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, transfers, recruitment, recruitment advertising, layoff, termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship. 2. Citv's RiQhts to Employ Other Consultants. The City reserves the right to employ other consultants in connection with this project. 3. Conflicts of Interest. A. The Consultant or its employees may be subject to the provisions of the California Political Reform Act of 1974 (the "Act"), which {1) requires such persons to disclose financial interests that may foreseeably be materially affected by the services performed under this Agreement, and (2) prohibits such persons from making, or participating in making, decisions that will foreseeably financially affedt such interests. B. If subject to the Act, the Consultant shall conform to all requirements of the Act. Failure to do so constitutes a material breach and is grounds for termination of this Agreement by the City. 4. Subcontractor. The Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the Services except as expressly stated heroin, without prior written consent of the City. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement. 5. Waiver. No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other breach or default, whether of the same or any other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by other parties shall give the other any contractual right by custom, estoppel, or otherwise. 6. Notices. All notices required hereunder shall be given in writing to the following addresses or such other addresses as the parties may designate by written notice: To the City: City of Fontana 8353 Sierra Avenue Fcntana, CA 92335 Attention: Rober~ W. Weddle, P.E. City Engineer To the Consultant: Ninyo & Moore, Inc. 155 West HosDitalitV Lane, Ste 165 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Notice shall be deemed received as follows, depending upon the method of transmittal: by facsimile, as of the date and time sent; by messenger, as of the date delivered; and by U.S. Mail, certified, return receipt requested, as of 72 hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail. 9 7. Authority to Enter A~reement. The Consultant is a [corporation/partnership] duly organized, validly existing in good standing under the laws of the State of California and will continue to be so during the term of this Agreement. The Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute and deliver, and to perform all of its obligations under this Agreement. Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right and authority to enter into this Agreement so as to bind each respective Party to perform the conditions contemplated herein. 8. Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 9. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence in this Agreement, and all parties agree to execute all documents and to proceed with due diligence to complete all covenants and conditions set forth herein. 10. Attorneys' Fees and Costs. If any legal action or other proceeding is brought for the enforcement of this Agreement or because of an alleged dispute, breach, default, or misrepresentation in connection with any provisions of this Agreement, the successful or prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees and other costs incurred in that: action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled. 11. Governin~ Law and Venue. ThisAgreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of California. Any lawsuit brought to enforce this Agreement shall be brought in the appropriate court in San Bernardino County, State of California. 12. Waiver. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be deemed or shall constitute a waiver of any other provision, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver. No waiver shall be deemed a waiver and no waiver' shall be binding unless executed in writing by the party making the waiver. 10 13. Days. Any term in this Agreement referencing time, days, or period for performance shall be deemed to be calendar days and not work days. 14. Entire Aqreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the City and the Consultant and supersedes any prior or written statements or agreements between the City and the Consultant, No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing by both parties. 15. Bindin~ on Assigns. Each and all of the covenants and conditions of this Agreement shall be binding on and shall inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the respective parties. 16. Invaliditv. The illegality of any provision of this Agreement shall not affect the remainder of this Agreement. 17. Counterparts, This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original and which collectively shall constitute one instrument. 18. Captions. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs of this Agreement are for the convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define,' limit, augment, or describe the scope, content, or intent of this Agreement or of any part or parts of this Agreement. 19. Construction. In all cases, the language in all parts of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning and no~ strictly for or against any party, it being agreed that the parties or their agents have all participated in the preparation of this Agreement. 20. Cooperation/Further Acts. The parties shall fully cooperate with one another in attaining the purposes of this Agreement and, in connection therewith, shall take any s~uch additional further acts and steps 11 and sign any such additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate and convenient as related thereto. 21. Suspension of Work. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, the Services performed by the Consultant may be suspended by the City in whole or in part from time to time, in any number of times, when determined by the City, in its sole discretion, that suspension is necessary and in the interest of the City, to ensure it has received sufficient funds from the Developer to timely pay the Agreement Costs. The Consultant shall comply immediately with any written order by the City suspending the Services. The Services shall be suspended until receipt by the Consultant of a written Services commencement order from the City. Further, and notwithstandin~i any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, any such suspension shall not relieve the Consultant of any of its obligations under this Agreement. Further, and notwithstandin~F any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, any such suspension shall be without any liability to the Consultant on the part of the City, and the Consultant shall not be entitled to any additional compensation as a result of such suspension. 22. Incorporation of Recitals and Exhibits. A. The "Recitals" constitute a material part hereof, and are hereby incorporated by reference herein as though fully set forth hereat. B. The "Exhibits" constitute a material part hereof, and are hereby incorporated by reference herein as though fully set forth hereat. 23. References. All references to the Consultant shall include all personnel, employees, agents and subcontractors of the Consultant. [SIGNATURE PROVISION ON FOLLOWING PAGE] 12 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have accepted and made and executed this Agreement upon the terms, conditions, and provisions set forth above as of the Effective Date. CITY OF FONTANA, CONSULTANT a municipal corporation '~~~e~evereaux ' ATTEST: *Notary *Notarization of signature is ~ 2 division tract, landscape hyntoya maintenance, and storm drain Ma ity C rk ~ fee agreements; all deeds, certificates of participation and compliance, and all other required by state law. Approved as to legal,form: or Stephen P. Deitsch City Attorney Frank Schuma Community Development Director Risk Management 13 EXHIBIT SCOPE OF SERVICES Provision of geotechnical services as required depending on the nature of the project and the project specifications. The tests will be performed on latest approved standards from recognized agencies and related to the work. The nature of such geotechnical services as expected but not limited to may consist of the following: 1. Optimum soil moisture density test 2. In place soil densities test 3. Sand equivalent test 4. Sieve Analysis 5. Soil Analysis 6. R-Value 7. Concrete Mix Design 8. Concrete Compression Test 9. Concrete Slump Test 10. Asphalt Core Density 11. Marshall Maximum Density 12. Field Observation 13. The consultant may be called upon to attend meetings during any phase of work to give technical advise The Consultant is expected to provide the lead role in providing the testing services under the general direction of the inspector and engineer as appropriate. The Consultant will be expected to provide the services required within twenty four hours of the City Engineer's or his authorized representative's request. Results of the tests shall be made available immediately in the field (where applicable) and followed by final reports within 48 hours after performance of the tests. EXHIBIT "B" 1998 SCHEDULE OF FEES HOURLY CHARGES FOR PERSONNEL Principal/kssociate Engineer/Geologist/Hydrogeologist/Environmental Scientist . .. Senior Project Engineer/Geologist/FIydrogeologist/Environmental Scientist ....... $77 Project Engineer/Geologist/Hydrogeologist/Environmenml Scientist ............ $74 Senior Staff Engineer/Geologist/Hydrogeologist/Environmental Scientist ........ $69 Staff Engineer/Geologist ............................................. $62 Senior Technician $42 Technician .................................................. $39 Technical Illustrator ................................................ $39 Geotechnical/]Environmental Assistant ................................... $28 Information Specialist ............................................... Word Processing/Technical Edking~Keproduction .......................... $27 OTHER CHARGES There will be a minimum charge of two hours for field observation or Expe~ witness testimony will be charged at $175 per hour, with a minimum charge of four hours. Direct project expenses (such as field equipment rental, consultants, permits, insurance, travel and subsistence) will be charged at cost plus 15 percent. Field vehicle usage will be charged ~t $6 per hour. Nuclear densi~ gauge usage will be charged at $9 per hour. Seismograph usage will be charged at $12 per hour. IncHnometer usage wilt be charged ar ];20 per hour. Rates for laboratory testing and use of o~her special equipment will be determined for e~,ch project, and will be provided upon request. iNVOiCES,TiiEpAyME~TS Invoices ' e rendered monthly unless otherwise arranged, and are payable upon ---r~,~i t. A service c f 1.5 percent per month will be charged on accounts not paid . . . . . . · ;~i"ecs~Ae"~er~ ercosts incurred in colleccing delinquent accounts 10225 Barnes Canyon ~oac~ · SulceA*l.12 San [):ego. California 92121 · Phone(619) 457-0400 · ~ax [619) ~.58-1236 55 V,/es[ Hospitality Lane · Su:ce 165 ° San BernBrajno, California 92408 · Phone (909138343777 · Fax (90c)) 383-8776 A4 OIIIL CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE ;-. P.CD~CEII 'TF;TrCER'/T~'~C'JTE IS ISSUED ~S A MATTE~F'~r~RMATIO~/%~/L~AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DEALEY, RENT~ & ASS~IATES DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE P.O. BOx 12675 POLICIES BELOW. Oakland, CA 94604-2675 CO~ffilES AFFORD~G COVBAGE Edi 510-465-3090 co~A~ LETTER Commerce ~ Industry Ins. Co. I~ LETTER B Associated Indemnitv Corp. Ninyo & Moore co~A~ 10225 Barnes Canyon Rd,SteA112 Guaranty National ins. S,n Diego, CA 92121 ~D American Intn'l Specialty X C~ERCIAL 6ENE~L LIABILitY GL3406115 10/03/94 10/03/95 PROOUCTS-C~P/OPAGG. $ 2.000 ~CLA~MS ~DE ~ OCCUR. PERSO~ & A~. INJU~ t 1.0GO .00O FiRE ~GE (~ one fire) S 50 X A~ AUTO CA2772810 10/03/94 10/03/95 LIMIT 1.000.000 J ~BRELLA ~O~ A6GREGAIE I 2,000.000 X OTHER T~N ~BR~LLA FO~ ~1005613 10/03/94 10/03/95' ~?:~~I~==~==?=~{=={==~ wPee64~e34 7/01/94 ?/01/95 EACHACCIO~N~ I 1.0OO.OOO 01SEASE-POLI~ LIMIT I 1.0OO .O00 Professional ??35557 10/03/94 10/03/95 $1,000,000 per & Contractors claim & $1,000,000 Pollution Liab. annual/aareglte RE: City of Fontone, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents are named ms additional insgrads as respects general and auto (per CAOO01) liability. . ............ ~:~ EXPIRATION OAT~ THEREOF. THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ~NDEAVQ~ TO ~j~ MAIL 30 DAYSWRITTENNOTICETOTN~CERTiFICAT~NOLD~NAM~DTOTHE C i t y o f F o n t a n a ~; L~FT~FAILUR~ TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL ~POS~ NO OBLIGATION At an' You$ uf Pant anw/I a ~;:~ LIA61LITYOF ANYKINDUPONTH~COMPANY.ITSAGENTSO~REPRESENTATIVES. ~RD'2~:r~l~e~ ..... ::~ ~ . ~=: ~. ~... ~..; =: ~ ~;~ ~:======= ;===~;; :: := :, ~ :; :; ~ ~ :; ~ := :~ ~:~}a~ August 31, 1995 Project No. 200646-01 City of Fontana 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, California 92335 Attention: Mr. Yousuf Patanwala Subject: Compaction Test Results, Sewer Trench Backfill Washington Drive Sewer ]Project Fontana, California City of Fontana Project No. SB-71-94 INTRODUCTION In accordance with your request and authorization, we have performed field density testing of the trench backfill for the sewer pipeline which was constructed beneath Washington Drive, from Cypress Avenue to approximately 800 feet east, in the City of Fontana, California (Figure 1). This report summarizes our observations, laboratory testing, and field density testing performed for the project. Our field density testing was performed between June 15 and July 25, 1995. BACKFILL TESTING OPERATIONS; Backfill of the sewer trench was performed by S.J. Burkhardt, Inc., under the direction of the City of Fontaria. Our services included on-call field density testing of the backfill operations as requested by the City of Fontana, and did not include full-time observation and testing of the backfill activities. Our firm was generally notified after a section of trench had been backfilled, and we were then requested to perform field density tests. The field density tests were performed in test pit excavations provided by the contractor at locations chosen by our firm. The backfill soils were tested to evaluate whether the soils were compacted to the project: specifications of 90 percent or more of the maximum dry density, with the top 12 inches of the backfill compacted to tZhe project specifications of 95 percent or more of the maximum dry density. 10225 Barnes Canyon Road · SolteAl 12 · San Drego, California 92121 · Phone (619) 457 0400 · Fax {619) 558 1236 9272jelonimo Road · Suite 123A · Iivine, California 92718 · Phone (714) 472 5444 · Fax (714) 472 5445 185 West Hospitality L~tne · Suite 165 San Bernard/no, California 92408 · Phone (909) 383-8777 · Fax (909) 383-8776 City of Fontana August 31, 1995 Washington Drive Sewer Project Project No. 200646-01 In-place moisture and density tests of the compacted backfill were performed by ASTM D2922- 91 and ASTM D3017-88 (Nuclear Methods), and by ASTM D1556-90 (Sand Cone Method). Results of our field density tests are presented in Table 1. The 40-scale improvement plans prepared by F. Molinos, R.C.E~ were utilized during testing in the field. The approximate test locations are shown on the attached Plate 1. Native on-site soils were used to backfill the trench excavation and generally consisted of a brown, silty fine to medium sand with scattered b~'avel. The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of the backfill soils were evaluated in our laboratory by the modified Proctor method (ASTM D1557-91). The results of our laboratory testing are presented in Table 2. When a field density test was performed that resulted in less than the m~nimum allowable relative compaction of 90 percent, the area was generally reworked and a retest was performed. CONCLUSIONS The test pit excavations and subsequent field density testing of the sewer trench backfill below the top 12 inches indicated that the areas tested by our firm were generally compacted to the specified relative compaction of 90 percent oi more, as evaluated utilizing ASTM Test Methods D2922-91 and D3017-88 (Nuclear), D1556-90 (Sand Cone), and D1557-91 (Laboratory Maximum Dry Density). The field density testing of the top 12 inches of the sewer trench backfill indicated that the areas tested by our firm were generally compacted to the specified relative compaction of 95 percent or more using the previously mentioned test methods. LIMITATIONS The field and laboratory testing presented in this report have been conducted in accordance with current practice and the standard of care exercised by geotechnical consultants performing similar tasks in th~s area. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made regarding the opinions expressed in this report. It is important to note that the precision of field density tests and the maximum dry density tests is not exact and variations should be expected. Further, we did not observe the majority of the backfill operations and have City of Fontana August 31, 1995 Washington Drive Sewer Project Project No. 200646-01 therefore provided no opinion regarding compaction or the uniformity of the backfill between test locations. The reported locations and elevations of the density tests were estimated from correlations between the project plans and field grade stakes. Further accuracy is not implied. We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. Should you have any questions regarding this report, we will be pleased to meet with you at your convenience. Sincerely, NINYO & MOORE RCE 54759 Jalal Vakili, Ph.D., RCE 45350 Project Engineer Principal Engineer KSY/MAS/JV/wgh Distribution: (3) Addressee (1) sJ. nurkhardt nc. Attachments: Figure 1 - Site Location Map Exp. q Table 1 - Summary of Field Density Tests Table 2 - Maximum Dry Density Test Results Plate I - Field Density Test Location Map VALLEY ~ I BLVD "')! .!!~ ~' r-" , , "~-~ ~ ...... I JB~RNARDINO I FR~ ~"~, ~ ' I , , ,, , ,,, , I ~ ~:: '.) ~,~,~ -,,..,~.:.,..~-,~..:.., ...:,. '.,~ ............ ...,.' '{.... :: ......- : :~:~ :> ..... . ....... · ".' .'1":' ""' "' ~ :'~'~' .....T"T;~7~IDE , C~ ,,, IjJy ~.... I ~//I,"' j I I - t: ..... : -,-' REFERENCE: 1995 Thoma~ Guide for San Bernardlno and Riverside Counties, Street Guide and Direcloq NOFITH ~ Approximate Scale In Fee~ r ~ r SITE. LOCATION MAP PAGE 1 FOR PROJECT NO. 200464-01 of .... ~rtt~' Fietd 0~). Fietd Max. Tested Spec. No. rAGE Z FOR PROJECT NO. 200464-01 Moisture Dry Retative Approx Content Densxty Conicaction Soit Test No. Date of FieEd O~). Field Max, Tested Spec, Type No. (%) (pef) (pcf) (%) (%) 41 06/30/95 SM 11+05 1094,0 9.9 6.5 125,1 134, O 93 90 5 42 06/30/95 £M 11+05 1096.0 10.7 6,0 126.9 140,0 91 90 1 43 06/30/95 SM 11+05 I098.0 8,7 6.0 127.9 140,0 91 90 1 44 06/30/95 SM 11+65 1089.5 7.9 6,0 127,0 140.0 91 gO 1 45 06/30/95 SM 11+65 1093.0 7.5 6.0 127.5 140.0 91 90 46 06/30/95 SM 11+70 1096.0 10.2 6,5 124,8 134.0 93 gO 5 RETEST OF ~6 47 06/30/95 SM 11+70 1098.D 9.D 6.5 123.6 134.0 92 90 5 48 06/30/95 SM 11+80 1100.0 8,B 6.0 127.8 140.0 91 90 1 49 ,07/05/95 SM 13+55 1099,5 7.4 6.5 120,7 134.0 90 gO 5 50 07/05/95 SM 13+60 1097.0 9.1 6,5 121,5 134.0 91 90 5 51 07/05/95 SM 13+50 1094.0 8,0 6,5 121.2 134,0 90 90 5 52 07/05/95 SM 13+60 1091.5 %0 6.5 120.4 134.0 90 90 53 07/05/95 SM 13+55 1089.5 7,9 6,5 !26.3 !34.0 94 90 5 54 07/05/~ SM 14+05 1099,0 8,8 6.5 125.6 134.0 94 gO 5 55 07/05/95 SM 14+05 1096.0 7.7 6.0 128,6 140.0 92 90 1 56 07/05/95 SM 14+05 1093,5 8,9 6.0 126.6 140.0 90 90 57 07/05/95 SM 13+95 1091.5 B.3 6.5 124.3 134.D 93 90 5 58 07/05/95 SM 13+95 1089,5 7,7 6.5 121,0 134.0 90 90 5 59 07/05/95 SM %+70 1099.5 9.9 6,5 124.8 134,0 93 90 5 60 07/05/95 SM 14+75 1096.5 8.9 6.0 128.6 140.0 92 90 1 61 07/05/95 SM 14+65 1094.0 9.7 6.5 124,7 134.0 93 90 62 07/05/95 SM 14+70 1092.0 10,1 6.5 124,1 134.0 93 90 5 63 07/05/95 SM 14+75 1090.0 8.0 6.0 127,4 140,0 91 90 1 64 07/05/95 SM 16+15 1099.0 7.9 6.0 127,4 140,0 91 90 1 65 07/05/95 SM 16+20 1096.0 7.8 6,5 120,2 134.0 90 90 5 66 07/05/95 SM 16+15 1093.0 lO,1 6.5 118.6 134,0 89 90 5 RETEST 67 07/05/95 SM 16+25 1093,0 8.5 6.5 122,2 134.0 91 90 5 RETEST OF 68 07/05/95 SM 16+30 1090.0 6.1 6.5 122.7 134,0 92 gO 5 69 07/06/95 SM 10+20 1089.5 11,3 6.0 126,6 140.0 90 90 1 70 07/06/95 SM 10+25 1092.5 11.7 6.0 125.9 140.0 90 90 1 71 07/06/95 SM 10+20 1095.5 9.4 6.0 128,2 140.0 92 90 72 07/06/95 SM 10+25 1098,0 9.3 6.0 128.8 140,D 92 90 1 73 07/06/95 SM 10+30 1100.0 12.3 6,5 124.6 134,0 93 gO 5 74 07/07/95 SM 12+90 1091.0 12,7 6.5 122.7 134.0 92 90 5 75 07/07/95 SM 12+95 1093.0 11,8 6.5 124.5 134.0 93 90 5 76 07/07/95 SM 12+85 1095,5 12,2 6,5 123.9 134.0 92 90 77 07/07/95 SM 12+90 1098.0 11,7 6.5 125.0 134.0 93 90 5 78 07/07/95 SM 12+95 1100.0 11.6 6.5 124.6 134,0 93 90 5 79 0T/25195 SM 10+40 1102.0 5.8 6.0 136.0 140.0 97 90 1 80 07/25/95 SM 12+80 1102.0 7.3 5.5 129.3 135.0 96 90 2 ~'A~ 3 FOR PROJECT NO. 200464-01 Hoisture Dry Retative T5~71~ Approx Content Density Co~action ' Test No. Date Test Test Location DeDth R~rks of (~t) F~etd Field 0~). Max. Test~ S~c. No~ (%) (~f) (~f) (%) (%) 81 07/25/95 SM 14+30 1102.0 6.7 6.0 133.1 140.0 95 90 82 07/25195 SH 15+~ 1102.0 6.4 5.5 130.7 135.0 97 90 2 83 07/25/95 SM 17+60 1102.0 5.7 5.5 128.2 135.0 95 90 2 City of Fontana August 31, 1995 Washington Drive Sewer Project Project No. :200646-01 EXPLANATION FOR SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No.: 1' Field density test by Sand-Cone Method (ASTM D1556-90) Test No.: 1# Field density test by Nuclear Method (ASTM D2922-91 and 3017-88) SM - Sewer Main Line SL - Sewer Lateral City of Fontana August 31, 1995 Washington Drive Sewer Project Project No. 200646-01 TABLE 2 MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY TEST RESULTS Soil Maximum Optimum Type No. Description Density Moisture 1 Brown, silty fine to medium sand with gravel 140.0 6.0 2 Gray brown, silty fine to medium sand with 135.0 5.5 gravel 3 Brown, silty fine sand, trace gravel 124.5 8.5 4 Brown, s~Ity fine sand with gravel 130.5 8.0 5 Brown, silty fine to medium sand with gravel 134.0 6.5 PROJECT NAME: U3~5~It,-~'~,'~ TEST NUM~ DATE ~/2E/~ YEAR TEST OF GRID LOCATION ELEVATION OR DEPTH A SAND + BOTTLE BEFORE (Ib.) DS B SAND+ BOTTLE AFTER (Ib.) MS ~.~ ~.~ ~.Za ~-~ S. ~ C SAND IN CONE + HOLE (Ib.) ' DC D SAND IN CONE (Ib.) MC E SAND IN HOLE (Ib.) F UNIT WEIGHT OF SAND (pcf) ~ ~ H TARE(OR RING) (Ib.) ~Z I SOIL+ ROCK (Ib.) J PLUS 3/4" ROCK (Ib.) K PERCENT PLUS 3/4" ROCK L PLUS NO. 4 ROCK (Ib.) ~i N VOLUME OF HOLE(OR R,UG)(ft.3 P WET SOIL+ ROCK + PAN (g) ~ Q DRYSOIL+ROCK+PAN(g) R MOISTURE WEIGHT (g) ',{ .o { ~7 ~ ~[ ~Z' ( {~'~ 8 PAN (g) ~ T DRY SOIL~ ROCK (g) U PERCENT MOISTURE V DRY DENSrTY (pcf) W LABORATORY MAXIMUM DENSITY(pcf) ~ CORRECTED MAXIMUM DENSITY (pcf) y OPTNUM M~STURE (%) Z SOIL TY~ NUMBER SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF TECHNICIAN'S INI'~ALS ~MARKS ' 'FIELD OBSERVATIONS Geotechnical ConsultantsDATE ,o2,,,..n..c..yo. Ro.d7I~/~1 m I· NO, I~ SuiteA-112 PROJ~ NAME~, , ~}~ROJ. NO. ~4~'~ f San Diego, CA 92121 (619) 457-0400 CLIENT PERMIT NO, DESCRIPTIONOF WORK PERFORMED ;.. FIELD TECHNICIAN HOUI~S O.T. VI~ ...... ~'~L . White-File Copy Yellow-Client Copy Pink-Field Copy Gold- Reviewer's Copy Pa~ ( of [ rE__ FIELD DENSITY TEST PROJECT NAME: ~5h'(L.~'~J~ ~(2.5;~'-uj ~ PROJECT NUMBER: 2~ ~ ~/~ ~ YEAR ~ TEST OF ~ TEST LOCATION/LOT NO./STATION NO. GRID LOCATION ELEVATION OR DEPTH - B SAND.+ BOTTLE AFTER (Ib.) MS E SAND IN HOLE (Ib.) ~ F UNIT WEIGHT OF SAND (pcf) ~ G SOIL + ROCK + TARE(OR RING) (Ib,) ~ H TARE(OR RING) (Ib.) ~ 2 I SOIL+ ROCK (Ib.) ~ PLUS 3/4" ROCK (Ib,) ~ K PERCENT PLUS a/4" ROCK WET SOIL+ ROCK + PAN (g) DRY SOIL.+ ROCK+ PAN (g) R MOISTURE WEIGHT (g) S PAN (g) T DRY SOIL+ ROCK (g) U PERCENT MOISTURE V DRY DENSITY (pcf) W LABORATORY MAXIMUM DENSITY(pcf} ~ CORREC~D MAXIMUM DENSITY (pcf) I X RELATIVE COMPACTION (%) ~ y OPIUM M~STUE (%) ~ Z SOIL TY~ NUMBER ~ SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF R~K ~CHNICIAN'S INITIALS ~MARKS rE,,,, FIELD DENSITY TEST PROJECT NAME: U~ ~--~ I~,'~ Z DATE 7//7/? ~ YEAR TEST LOCATION/LOT NO./STATION NO. GRID LOCATION ELEVATION OR DEPTH A SAND + BOTTLE BEFORE (Ib.) DS B SAND+ BOTTLE AFTER (Ib.) MS ~ C SAND IN CONE + HOLE (Ib.) DC ~Z~}~ gZr5 II~ ~ZI~ D SAND IN CONE (Ib.) MC E SAND IN HOLE (Ib.) F UNIT WEIGHT OF SAND (pcf) G SOIL · ROCK + TARE(OR RING) (Ib.) H TARE(OR RING) (Ib.} z I SOIL+ ROCK (Ib.) J PLUS 3/4" ROCK (Ib.) "' K PERCENT PLUS 3/4' ROCK L PLUS NO, 4 ROCK (Ib.) p WET SOIL+ ROCK+ PAN (g) Q DRY SOIL+ ROCK+ PAN (g) R MOISTURE WEIGHT (g) S PAN (g) T DRY SOIL+ ROCK (g) U PERCENT MOISTURE W LABORATORY MAXIMUM DENSlTY(pcf) ~ CORRECTED MAXIMUM DENSITY (pcf) y OPtMUM M~STU~ (%) Z SOIL TY~ NUMBER SPECIFIC GRAVI'rY OF R~K ~CHNICIAN'S INITIALS ~MARKS Ot'~, 'FIELD OBSERVATIONS ...,...n,...~.n..,,an,. ,A~I~/~tDAY~:~,,~ t A""OR ~,~ 19~25 Barnes Canyon Road ~ NO, ~ ~ Suite A-112 PROJ, NAME ~.1(~ NO,~Q (619) 457-0400 CENT · , :, · ..j . ,1, EQUIPME~ W~ER DAILY YARDA~ PERMIT NO. DESCRIPTION OF WORK PERFORMED FELD TECHNICIAN HOURS O.T. VISITORS CLIENT I~p. White-File Copy Yellow-Client Copy Pink-Field Copy G~ld- Reviewer's Copy Page ~ of FIELD:' OBSERVATIONS 10225 Barnes Canyon Road DATE 7 (~ ~/.~ DAY ~ t~C~ c[{ ~ p' ~ EQUIPMENT W~ER ' DAILY YARDA~ PERMIT NO. DESCRIPTION.OF WORK PERFORMED , ~ FIELD TECHNICIAN HOURS O.T. VISITORS - ~,' 1; ," · q.,.,' c_u ... ,.~S', ~ .' '..-:'..,--,. ,- ':rk-- ~,.~,., <... ....~ ~. "'.. ,.-::'; ;,._....?:,:'~:.-;...., : Z ..:,:; ' --/ CLIENT REP.: ,., '; ~, White-File Copy Yellow-Client Copy Pink-Field Copy Gold- Reviewer's COpy Page FIELD TECHNICIAN HOURS O.T. VISITORS CLIENT REP. White-File Copy Yellow-Client Copy pink-Field Copy Gold- Reviewer's Copy Page ~ of ( PROJECT NAME: uJ~,s~-~,l~'T~ GRID LOCATION ELEVATION OR DEPTH A SAND+ BOTTLE BEFORE (Ib.) DS B SAND+ BOTTLE AFTER (Ib.) MS $~7 ........... C SANDINCONE+HOLE(Ib.) DC I~Z ~J/ I~ IcT~ IO~ t~ ~f D SAND IN CONE (Ib,) MC 14~ E SAND IN HOLE (Ib.) F UNIT WEIGHT OF SAND (pcf) G SOIL · ROCK + TARE(OR RING) (Ib.) H TARE(OR RING) (Ib,) ~ z I SOIL+ ROCK (Ib.) J PLUS 3/4' ROCK (lb.) K PERCENT PLUS 3/4" ROCK L PLUS NO, 4 ROCK (Ib.) ~ M PERCENT PLUS NO. 4 ROCK P WET SOIL+ ROCK + PAN (g) ~ Q DRY SOIL + ROCK + PAN (g) R MOISTURE WEIGHT (g) ~ PAN (g) T DRY SOIL-F ROCK (g) U PERCENT MOISTURE V DRY DENSITY (pcf) W LABORATORY MAXIMUM DENSITY(pcf) ~ CORRECTED MAXIMUM DENSITY (pcf) X RELATIVE COMPACTION (%) ~ y OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%) ~ Z SOIL TY~ NUMBER ~ SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF ROCK ~CHNICIAN'S INITIALS ~MARKS PROJECT NAME: t.~,~s~-~%~.~-r~3 TESTNUM~ DATE ~ ~ ~: YEAR TEST LOCATION/LOT NO./STATION NO. GRID LOCATION ELEVATION OR DEPTH ~ A SAND + BOTTLE BEFORE (Ib,) DS Z B SAND'+ BOTTLE AFTER (Ib,) MS ~1 D SAND IN CONE (Ib.) MC I~ E SAND IN HOLE (Ib.) = F UNIT WEIGHT OF SAND (pCf) ~ ~ G SO~L · ROCK + TARE(OR raNG) (~b.) ~ H TARE(OR RING) (Ib.) J PLUS 3/4" ROCK (Ib.) ~ K PERCENT PLUS 3/4' ROCK h L PLUS NO, 4 ROCK (Ib.) M PERCENT PLUS NO. 4 ROCK WET SOIL+ ROCK+ PAN (g) DRY SOIL + ROCK + PAN (g) R MOISTURE WEIGHT (g) S PAN (g) U PERCENT MOISTURE W LABORATORY MAXIMUM DENSITY(pcf) ~ CORREC~D MAXIMUM DENSITY (pcf) X RELATIVE COMPACnON (%) ~ y OPTIMUM M~STURE (%) t Z SOIL TY~ NUMBER ' ~ SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF R~K MARKs FIELD TECHNICIAN HOURS O.T. VISITORS CLIENT REP. White-File Col3y Yellow-Client Copy Pink-Field Copy Gold- Reviewer's Copy Page ~ of P.,__.. FIELD DENSITY TEST PROJECT NAME: ,~_..~.~-Toto ~ .,~;~3,~ ~TL PROJECT NUMBER: ~ q:,4G ~ GRID LOCATION : ELEVATIOH OR DEPTH ~ A SAND + BOTTLE BEFORE (Ib.} DS B SAND+ BOTTLE AFTER (Ib,) MS ~ C SAND IN CONE + HOLE (Ib.)~ DC {~4 ~2 I~ ~t2~ ~7 O~ SAND IN CONE (Ib.) MC ~ ; SAND IN HOLE (Ib.) ~ ~ ' F UNIT WEIGHT OF SAND (pcf) ~ G SOILt ROCK+TARE(OR RING) (Ib,) ~ H TARE(OR RING) (Ib,) ~ ~ L PLUS NO. 4 ROCK (Ib.) O P WET SOIL.+ ROCK + PAN (g) Q DRY SOIL,+ ROCK · PAN (g) R MOISTURE WEIGHT (g) h ~ PAN (g) ~ T DRY SOIL~ ROCK (g) U PERCENT MOISTURE V DRY DENSITY (pcf) 127. a %Z~,~ ~.Z W LABORATORY MAXIMUM DENSITY(pcf) ~ CORRECTED MAXIMUM DENSITY (pcf) X RELATIVE COMPACTION (%) ~ ~ ~ ~ y OPIUM M~STURE (%) ~ Z SOIL TY;~ NUMBER ' SPECIFIC QRAVITY OF PERCENT ~US 3/4'/N0, 4 IN MAX. ~MARKS E.,, FIELD DENSITY TEST PROJECT NAME: '~ ~\(&4't.r~ ~,, ~ PROJECT NUMBER: TEST OF ,, ~'~ ~.2~ CH-~ ~-~-~4 ~-~-~C ~-~ ~-2~-~ TEST LOCAT.ON/LOT NO./STAT.ON NO. ~ 0~0 ~ 1~ ......... A SAND + BOTTLE BEFORE (Ib.) DS ~ _' B SAND+ BOTTLE AFTER (Ib.) MS ~,? ..... f~7 -- ~ C SAND IN CONE + HOLE (Ib.)~ DC ~ ~2~Z ~ H~ I~ ~Z~ ~ IO~ D SAND IN CONE (Ib.) MC {29,~ }~-~ ~O,~ t~?.~ I~,f tg0.~ I~l I~G E SAND IN HOLE (Ib.) ~ F UNIT WEIGHT OF SAND (pcf) G SOIL + ROCK + TARE(OR RING) (Ib.) H TARE(OR RING) (Ib.) ~ z I SOIL+ ROCK (Ib.) II K .S.CS.T PLUS a 4' .OC N VOLUME OF HOLE(OR RING)(ft.3) p WET SO~L+ ROCK+ PAN (O) Q DRY SOIL+ ROCK+ PAN (g) R MOISTURE WEIGHT (g) ' S PAN (g) I T DRY SOIL+ ROCK (g) ~ - - _ U PERCENT MOISTURE ~'~ ~.f ~,G 7.~ {0-( {~.~ ~O-7 ~.c] V DRY DENSITY (pcf) ~.~ t~t.~ {~.9 l~.~ I{~~ ~2%,~ }Z~.L }~.} ~Z~.~ W LABORA'rORY MAXIMUM DENSITY(pcf) ~ CORRECTED MAXIMUM DENSITY (pcf) 13~ .C) / ~ ~ ~ y OPtMUM M~STU~ (%) ~. ~ ~' t Z SOIL TY~ NUMBER' ~ /"~ ~--~-~ ~ SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF R~K ~ PERCENT ~US 3/4'/NO. 4 IN MAX. I Z'° / I?'D i4.~ (~.~ i~.D {E' {~ o I~ ~MARKS PROJECT NAME: ~,~,~_~,~t,~-~ TEST NUMB~ER TEST OF TEST LOCATIOI/LOT NO./STATION NO. GRID LOCATIOI ELEVATIO~ OR )EPTH A SAND+BO'rTLI: BEFORE (Ib,) DS ~ B SAND+ BOTTLI: AFTER (Ib.) ~ SAND IN CONE ~ HOLE (Ib,} DC iZ~ ~? IO~ {Z~ l~3i )~ ( SAND IN HOLE (Ib.) ~ ~ ' F UNIT WEIGHT )F SAND (pcf) G SOIL+ ROCK ~ TARE(OR RING) (Ib.) H TARE(OR RIN ) (Ib.) ~ ~ I SOIL'+ ROCK Ib.} J PLUS 3/4" R( ~CK (Ib.) K PERCENT PL~ S 3 }4" ROCK ~ ~ M PERCENT PL S NO. 4 ROCK N R RING)(ft.3) P WET SOIL+ F OCK + PAN (g) ~ Q DRY SOIl. + R 3CK + PAN (g) R MOISTURE M ~HT (g) 8 PAN (g) W LABORATOF ' MAXIMUM DENSITY(pcr) ~ CORREC~O MAX~ DENSITY (pcf} X .ELATIVEC(,MPACTION(%) ~ y OPtMUM MC ISTURE (%) ~ Z 801L TVE UMBER ~ SPECIFIC GRAVI' 'Y OF ~K ~MARKS E__ FIELD SITY TEST PROJECT NAME: Ld4%.S~{t~1'~-~ b(.. ~E.L PROJECT NUMBER: ,, DATE ~/Z~/~'~ YEAR TESTOF :;L-I SL-~ ~L-~ ~L-~ ~L-~' ~L-~ ~-~ ~,~ ELEVATION OR DEPTH ~'.G' --~'~ -~.d ~ -~,~ ~.r' -I~'~ - ~ A SAND + BOTTLE BEFORE (Ib.) DS C SAND IN CONE + HOLE (Ib,) ; DC ~.~ {~ j~ I~ t~ f~$O ~)1 IZ~~ i2]~ ~ ~ D SAND IN CONE (Ib.} MC lTa.~ ~,~ tGt.~/~,S I?~ 1~7.~t~.~ 1~,3 ~ ~ E SAND ,N ,OL, ~ SOIL + ROCK + TARE(OR RING) (Ib.) TARE(OR RING) (Ib.) ~ :- L PLus ,o. 4 ROC~ ~b.> M PERCENT PLUS NO. 4 ROCK ~ ~ N VOLUME OF HOLE(OR RING)(ft.3) ~ O WET DENSITY Ipcf) I~,3 ~G~ {bT.I ~3~,F ~4.~ I~.Q ~l~,~ 137,~ P WET SOIL+ RCCK+PAN (g) Q DRY SOIL~ ROCK+ PAN (g) R MOISTURE WEIGHT (g) S PAN (g) ~ T DRY SOIL~ ROCK (g) U PERCENT MOISTURE ~,~ I~,Z ~,~ ~,I ~ t.3 IQ,~ R. I ~ J,~ W LABORATORY MAXIMUM DENSITY(pcf) ~ CORRECTED MAXIMUM DENSITY (pcf) %~,Q .~ ................... I~ ~,~ X RELATIVE COMBACTION (%) C{ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~0 ~ O c~ ( ~1 ~ ~ Z SOIL TY~ NUMBER ' ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ SPECIFIC GRAVffiTY OF R~K ~ PERCENT ~U8 3/4"/N0. 4 IN MAX, ~.~ %~.P (;,o ~1.~ l~~ iS, ~,~ F&, ~CHNICIAN'S INITIALS ~ .~ rE--- FIELD DENSITY TEST PROJECT NAME: L~ r~(~rijS~ ?Z:~ hi7--, TEST'NUM~, TEST OF GRID LOCATION ELEVATION OR DEPTH A SAND + BO'rTLE BEFORE (Ib.) DS ~ B SAND+ BOTTLE AFTER (Ib.) MS ~.~ ~ C SAND IN CONE + HOLE (Ib.) DC ~ZO 1~ }~ {~oq 1~ ~0 D SAND IN CONE (Ib.) MC I~,~ ~ E SAND IN HOLE lib.) ~ F UNIT WEIGHT OF SAND (pcf) H TARE(OR RINGI (Ib.) ~ Z J SOIL+ ROCK (Ib,) K PERCENT PLUS 3/4" ROCK ~ L PLUSNO, 4ROCK(Ib.) ~ 0 WET DENSITY (pcf) P WET SOIL+ ROCK+ PAN (g) Q DRY SOIL+ ROCK + PAN (g) R MOISTURE WEIGHT (g) ~ S PAN (g) U PERCENT MOISTURE W LABORATORY MAXIMUM DEN~ITY(pcf) ~ CORRECTED MAXIMUM DENSITY (pcf) }~,~ X RELATIVE COMPACTION (%) ~ y OPTIMUM M~STU~ (%) ~ Z SOSL T~ NUdeS. ' ~ SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF R~K TECHNICIAN'S IffiTIALS ' DALLY REPORT OF ,,.,if~jP/,j/ff'O ',/q/tOOt"'E,. i.C :: F: IELD OBSER V A TIONS 10225 Barnes Canyon Road San Diego, CA 92121 (619) 457-0400 CLIENT ~ c EQUIPMENT W~R DAILY YA~AGE PERMIT NO. · DESCRIPTION OF WORK PERFORMED FIELD TECHNICIAN HOURS O.T. VISITORS CLIENT REP. White-File Copy Yellow-Client Copy Pink-Field Copy Gold~ Reviewer's Copy Page ~ of r , gi~,FIELD OBSER TIONS _ 0 E VA San Diego, CA 92121 ~ (619) 457-0400 CLIENT, ~ T~ ~-'C~ EQUtPMENT 'W~ER DAILY YARDA~ PERMIT NO. ~ ~CHNICIAN ~S O.T. VISIT~S CLIENT ~P. White-File Cooy Yellow-ClientCopy Pink-Field Copy ,Gold)Reviewer's Copy Pa~ , ~/~ z;',~ gore, ',~:~:,i,.!!~i;i,i,~FiELD OBSERVATIONS ~ NO. ~ SuiteA-112 PROJ. NAME ~ O~ ~OJ. NO.Z~~ G4~-O/ San Diego, CA 92121 ' EQUIPME~ W~ER DAILY YARDA~ PERMIT NO. L~ ~ ~'~, .' ~):~- ; ' ," FELl) TECHNICIAN HOURS :' '0.T. !: VISITORS. ' .. White-File Copy Yellow-Client Copy Pink-Field Copy G01d-~Reviewer's C~pyi'~';:= Page ~ of ;= '::{ EPORT,OF - ,-: !. FIELD.;,OBSERVATIONS P. z 10225 Barnes Canyon Rood: ~:. =: , , '. ~ San Diego, CA 92121 <6~9~ 457-0400 CUENT ' ~ ~y cF ~:~'~1 EQUI~ENT W~ER DAILY YARDAGE ~ PERMIT NO, FIELD TECHNICIAN HOURS O,T, VISITORS White-File Copy Yellow-Client Copy Pink-Field Copy Gold-~Reviewer's Copy Page I of e - · .:,.:~.~FIELD' ,OBSERVATIONS 10225 Barnes Canyon Road DA ;~, ~ ! ~J~ AUTHOR "F- I~ . SanDiego, CA 92121 (619) 457-0400 CLIENT EQUI~ENT W~ER , DAILY YARDA~ · ' PERMIT NO. DESCRIPTION .OF WORK PERFORMED '' :~ ': ' ~ ~ ' ~ .~:f' .' , ,,.,, White-File Copy Yellow-Client Copy Pink-Fi~ld:~Bp~ ' Gold- Reviewer's Copy Pa~ { of f- ,,.:: FIELD OBSERVATIONS DA 7~ ~' ~0225 Barnes Canyon Road ' San Diego, CA 92~2~ (6~9) 457-0400 CLIENT ~ ~ ~ ~(~ CONT~CTOR ~ . ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ T FORE~N - ~ C,~ DAILY YARDAGE PERMIT NO. DESCRIPTION OF WORK PERFORMED '~ * FIELD TECHNICIAN HOURS O;T, ' VISITORS White-File COpy Yellow-Client COpy ~ Pink-Field Copy Gold- Reviewer's Copy Page PROJECT NAME: (~ ~' ~ ~P~ ~,s~, I~'~-~ ~r~, %~ ~ ~ ~ E c r PROJECT NUMBER: GRID LOCATION ~ ~ C::.::,:::::~""''`''''''' ,~,.~ ,,,.~ ;~ ,~.~ P WET SOIl.+ ROCK+ PAN (g) ~ Q DRY SOIL.+ ~OCK+ PAN (g) ~ T DRY SOIt.+ ROCK (g) U PERCENT MO STURE t Q ,~ ~, ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~, ~ W LABORATOR MAXIMUM DENSITY(pCf) ~ CORRECTED IAXIMUM DENSITY (pcf) ~S'~ ~ .~ I~, ~ r~. ~ X RELATIVE CC MPACTION (%) ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ O ~ y OPIUM MOSTU~ (%) ~ Z SOIL TYF~ NJMBER ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF R~K 3BSER A IONS , ,: V T 10225 Barnes Canyon Road, '~' NO. ~' Suite A-112 PROJ.: NAME'~t~L~rt(k~'~3~ San Diego, CA 92121 (619) 457-0400 CLIENT C tly ~ ~ CONT~CTOR ~ ~ ~LtC~.~T '/~ FOREMAN EQUIPMENT ~ ~c~o ~ / ~ ~n ~0~ ~ WB~ER ~ ~:~ L ~u ¢ t~ ':;" ,. DALLY YARDA~ ' PERMIT NO. DESCRIPTION OF WORK PERFORMED "~'" ' ~, L. FIELD TECHNICIAN HOURS O.T. VISITORS CLIENT R~P..4." L'T..'Y,,-,,'/...,z'f-;?'/,,, White-File Copy Yellow-Client Copy Pink-Field Copy Gold- Reviewer'e Copy Page pROJECTNAME.~IT~/,3F'~:~'~, TEST NUM~ TEST OF" TEST LOCATION/LOT NO./STATION NO. GRID LOGATION ELEVATION O~ DEPTH - ~ SAND + BOTTLE BEFORE (Ib,) DS SAND+ BOTTLE AFTER (Ib.) MS SAND IN CONE + HOLE (Ib.) ' DC SAND IN CONE (Ib.) MC ~ SAND IN HOLE (Ib.) UNIT WEIGHT OF SAND (pCf) ~SOIL · ROCK + TARE(OR RING) (Ib.) TARE(OR RING) (Ib.) SOIL+ ROCK (Ib,) JPLUS 3/~' ROCK {Ib,) KPERCENT PLUS 374' ROCK PERCENT PLUS NO, 4 ROCK VOLUME OF HOLE(OR RING)(ft.3 WET DENSITY (pCf) ~WET SOIL+ ROCK + PAN (g) DRY SOIl.+ ROCK+ PAN (g) ;MOISTURE WEIGHT (g) PAN (g) T DRY SOIl,+ ROCK (g) U PERCENTMCISTURE V DRY DENSITY (pcf) W LABORATORY MAXIMUM DENSITY(pcf) ~ CORRECTED MAXIMUM DENSITY (pcf) RELATIVE CCMPACTION (%) y OP~ui MOISTU~ (%) SOIL TY~ NUMBER SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF R~K MARKs -., ,- FIELD OBSERVATIONS ,4/_ 10225 Barnes Canyon Road 1, ~ ~J F~Z--p NO, "' SuiteA-112 '~" ...........PROj NAMEt~i~T<~~ ~' ROJ NO SanDiego, CA 92121 ' . ~ ~ <e~9} 457-0400 CU~NT:~y ~p' C~T~CTOR ' , ' FORE~N ~ ~ CC DAILY YARDAGE PERMIT NO. PERFORMED .... ' ' DESCRIPTION .OF WORK FIELD TECHNICIAN HOURS O.T. VISITORS White-File Copy Yellow-Client Copy Pink-Field Copy ~Gold~Reviewer's ZODy Pa~ ~ of / __ D NSITY TEST PROJECT NAME:G{~' ~E~ TEST NUM~ TEST OF .~ TEST LOCATION/LOT NO,/STATION NO. ~O~ GRID LOCATION ' ELEVATION OR DEPTH ~ ~ SAND + BOTTLE BEFORE (Ib.) DS 1~31~.70 ~ _D SAND IN CONE (Ib.) MC ~,~ ~ F UNIT WEIGHT OF SAND (pcf) ~ ~ G SOIL ~ ROCK + TARE(OR RING) (Ib.) ~ H TARE(OR RIN~) (Ib.) . SO~L+ ROCK (~b.) ~'~7 ~ J PLUS3,."ROC~<~J 1.7~ L~C ~ K PERCENT PLUS 3/4" ROCK ~ L _~ PLUS NO. 4 POCK (Ib.) ~ ~ N VOLUME OF HOLE(OR RING)(ft.3) ~ ~ WET DENSITY (pcf) ~, p WET SOIL+ ROCK~PAN (g) ~ Q DRY SOIL+ ;OCK~ PAN (g) R MOISTURE WEIGHT (g} S PAN (g) ~ T DRY SOIL+ ROCK (g) V DRY DENSITY (pcf) W LABORATORY MAXIMUM DENSITY(pcf) /~ ~ CORRECTED MAXIMUM OENSITY (pcf) X RELATIVE COMPACTION (%) ~ y OPT~UM M~STURE (%) ~ Z SOIL TY~ NUMBER ~ SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF R~K ~MARKS o SERVAT ONS B 1022~ Barnes Canyon Roa~ NO. ~ SuiteA-112 PRO~ NAME Sanole~o, cA S~ .. se'~ ~ Pao~. NO.~ ~ (619) 457-0400 CLIEN~ ~ ~ ' 0 ~ ~:-~~ CONT~CTOR ~,~ .~~,~ FOREMAN ~O~ ~U~(~T EQUIPMENT W~R DAILY YARDA~ PERMIT NO, ,..~ F~ ~CHNIC~N - ',~ ~ '~,; O.T.': ' VISITO~ - "' - ': . White-File Copy Yellow-Client COpy Pink-Field Copy Gold- Reviewer's Copy Pa~ X of X .,. FIELD DENSITY TEST PROJECT NAME:~r1y oF'T-~r~F~ E I ~ YEAR TEST OF ~ST LOCAT~N/LOT NO./STA~ON NO, GR~ LOCATION ELEVATION OR DEPTH - I ~ A SAND + BOTTLE BEFORE (~.) DS C SA~ IN CONE + HOLE (Ib.) ~ DC D SAND ~N ~ (ib.) MC E SA~ ~N HO~ (mJ F UN~TWEI~TOFSA~(pce ~ G SOILf ~CK+TARE(M RING) (Ib.) H TARE(M RING) 0b.) I so~+ ROCK (e.) J PLUS 3/4" ROCK (Ib.) K ~RCENT PLUS 3/4" RO~ - L PLUS NO, 4 R~K (Ib,) M PERCENT PLUS NO, 4 ROCK 0 WET DENSITY (pcf} P WET S~+ R~K+ PAN (~ ~ Q DRY S~+ ROCK + PAN (g) R MOET~ WE~HT (g) 8 PAN (9) t T DRY SOL+ R~K (~ U ~ENTMOIST~ V DRY DENSITY (pcf) I ~,~ W ~BORATORY MAXIMUM DENSITY(pcf) ~ C~REC~ ~X~ ~NSITY X ~TIVE CO~AC~N (%) ;y ~UM M~T~ (%) Z S~L TY~ N~R ' e SPECIF~ GRAVI~ OF R~K . ~S FIELD ': OBSERVATIONS G.e,..,.,..,cona.,,an..I ~" 10225 Barnes Canyon Road ~ ~ ~ NO, ; SuiteA-112 . . ~ . San Diego, CA 92121 (e19) 457-0400 CLIENT ~ {~/O~ ~G~'~ CONTRACTOR ~,; ,'~C ~ ~{, FORE~N ~,~(~b~ EQUIPMENT W~ER DAILY YARDAGE PERMIT NO. FIE~ ~CHNICIAN HO~S O,T. VISITORS C~ ~ ~ ~ , ' ' ' .,:'.~.~.~.~.~ White-File Copy Yellow-Client Co~y Pink-Field Copy ' Gold- Reviewer's Copy Pa~ TEST NUM~ PATS ~ Q~ LOCATION ELEVAT~N 5ANO+ BOTTLE SA~ IN CONE +HOLE (Ib.) SAND IN CO~ UNIT WEIGHT ~US NO. 4 R~K (Ib,) PERCENT ~US NO. 4 ROCK WET DENSITY (pcf) WET SOIL+ DRY S~L+~(g) MOIST~EWE~HT(g) PAN (g) DRY SOL+ R~K (g) ~ENTMOIST~ DRY DENSITY (pc~ ~BORATORY MAXN~ ~NSITY(pCf) ~LATWE COMPAC~N OPIUM M~T~ ~ECF~C GmAWTY OF m~K ~MA~S ,~jP/,j/ff'O~j~ftki} ~ILY. REPORT' OF ,,. ORE'. ;:.:.: FIELD OBSERVATIONS Geotechnical Consultants DATE DAY 10225 Barnes Canyon Road NO. SuiteA-112 ' PR ' M San Diego, CA 92121 (6i9) 457-0400. CLIENT: EQUIPMENT ~' ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ' DALLY YARDA~ PERMIT NO, DESCRIPTION OF WORK PERFORMED FIELD TECHNICIAN HOURS 0.T, VISITORS cLiENT White-File Copy Yellow-Client Copy Pink-Field Copy Gold- Reviewer's COpy Page of