HomeMy WebLinkAbout5.1 General Correspondence (4) City of Fontana
CALIFORNIA
December 7, 1989
RE: Negative Declaration for
San Bernardino County Foothill/Beech Sewer Project
Clerk of the Board
385 North Arrowhead, 2nd Floor
San Bernardino, CA 92415-0130
Clerk of the Board:
Enclosed is a copy of the Notice of Determination for the above referenced
item, This document is provided for filing with your office in accordance with
State law.
The duplicate copy and return envelope is provided to assist in the mailing of
the duplicate form to the City.
If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely yours,
Robert W. Weddle
Interim City Engineer
RWW.'YP:cm
Enclosure
8353 S[ERRA AVENUE (P.O. BOX 518) · FONTANA, CALIFORNIA 92334-0518 · (714) 3804600
SISTER CiTY -- YAMLOOPS, B.C. CANADA
APPIa~!X;.~,~ Clty of F~jana
IIOTICE OF DETEIUIINATIOII Engineering Dtvtston
8353 Sierra Avenue
Fontaria, CA 92335
TO: Office of Planning and Research
1400 Tenth Street, Room 121
Sacramento, CA 95814
_X_ County Clerk
County of San Bernardtno
385 N. Arrowhead Avenue
San Bernardtrio, CA 92415 ~-.~.~..
9LIBOECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance
Section 21108 or 21152 of the Publtc Resources Code.
ProJect T~tle:
Foothtll Boulevard/Beech Avenue Sewer ProJect
Stat~ CJ~afi~ghousalr C,~tactFerso~ Teleph~neiksber
Yousuf Patanwala (714~ 350-7661
FfoJectLocatton:
Zn extsttng right of way on northslde of Foothill Boulevard
between Hemlock and Lime Avenues and on extsttng Beech Avenue
right of way between Foothill Boulevard and Baseline Avenue
~roJectDescrtFtton:
To construct trunk sewer ]tne in extsttng right of way of
Foothill Boulevard and Beech Avenue in the above mentioned
This is to advise that the Cttv of Fontaria has approved the
above described project on December 5. 1989 and has made the
!Fol]owlng determtnatlons regarding the above descY1bed project:
1. The project wl]l, X will not have a
significant ef~:~'on.the env'~r~ment.
2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for
this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
X A Ne9attve Declaration was prepared for this
project pursuant to the provisions of
3.Httlgatton measures X were, were not made a
condition of approvaT'oFthe project.
4. A statement of ,Overriding Considerations was,
X was not adopted for this project.
This is to certify that the fina~ ND with comments
responses and record of project approval ts avafiable to ~e
Genera~ PubJtc at the City of Fontana Engineering
OateRecetvedFor Ffitng aa~ost~ngatOFR: \~:~'.
Signature Tttle
CITY OF FONTANA
FONTANA, CALIFORNZA
NIOTZCE OF HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C/TY OF FONTANA THAT A
PUBLIC HEARZNG WILL BE HELD TO CONSZDER SEWER PROJECTS WHICH ARE PROGRAMMED
TO SERVE NORTH FONTANA AND TO CONSZDER THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION RELATZNG TO
THESE PROJECTS.
NATURE OF REQUEST: To consider sewer projects which are
programmed to serve North Fontaria
and the negative declaration
relating to thereof.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City Envlronmental Review
Officer has revtewed the project and
made the following environmental
determination recommendation:
Negattve Declaration
LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Foothill Blvd. between Cherry Ave.
and Beech, and on Beech between
Foothill and Baseline. Exact
location maps on ftle in the City
Clerk's Department.
DATE OF HEAR/NG: December 5, 1989
PLAC~ OF HEARZNG: City Hall Council Chambers
8353 Sierra Ave
Fontana, CAlifornia 92335
TIME OF HEARING: 5~30 P.M.
ANY :iNTERESTED PARTY MAY APPEAR ANO PRESENT ANY [NFORMATZON WHZCH MAY BE OF
ASS[STANCE TO THE CITY COUNCZL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERN/NG THIS
PROJECT, PLEASE CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
CZTY COUNCZL
CITY OF FONTANA, CAL[FORN/A
Publish on or before November 24, 1989.
P.O. #20502
City Clerks Department
A ENDA 'TEMgD(I&2)
~ CITY COUNCIL ACTION REPORT
Decelber 5. 1989 Publlc tleartng
fleeting Date Agenda Placement
TO: Mayor and Ctty Counctl
i~(W4: Annivory Calvert, Publlc Works D~rector
SIJB,1ECT: SEWER LiNE COHSI'RUCTION TN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD FROM HEMLOCK TO
LTME AND BEECH AVENUE FROM FOOTHILL AVENUE TO BASELXNE
CJJRRE]fF ACTTON REQUESTED:
1. MOTION TO APPROVE A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR CONSTRUCTING A SEWER LiNE TH
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD FROH HEMLOCK TO LiME AND BEECH AVENUE FROM FOOTHTLL TO
BASELTHE.
2. MOTION TO AUTHORIZE THE PUBLIC kffiRKS DEPARTMENT TO ADVERTISE FOR BiD THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A SEHER LiNE ZH FOOTHILL BOULEVARD FROM HEMLOCK TO LiME
AND BEECH AVENUE FROM ;OOTHILL TO BASELINE; AND TO APPROVE THE
APPROPRIATTON OF $1,000,000 FROM THE CiTY SEHER FUND FOR THE PRO~IECT.
FISCAL IllFACT: '~T Yes 'F"T Me
The cost of construction of the Foothill/Beech Sewer Line project w~11 be
f
by the Ctty Sewer Fund. A substantial portton o thts fund was established v~
developer purchase of sewer connection rights.
Additional fundtng requests will be made at a later date for construct~ln
~nspection, construction surveying, materials testing and contract
administration services.
The design of the Foothill/Beech Sewer project has been ongotng for
years. Prtor to constructing thts project, an environmental assessment had
be accomplished.
Provisions of the California Environmental qualtty Act of 1970 (CEQA) require
that the City determine the effect of projects such as thts on the
environment. A negattve declaration certifies that such a review has been
conductel the project wtll not have a significant effect on the environmen;;
and an environmental tmpact report (EIR) ts not required. Affected parties
reserve the right to appeal such a determination.
For this proJect's envtr'onmental analysts, certain ffdttgatton measures were
noted that will be a part of the construction program (dust abatement, no~se
control, etc.)
A spectal mttlgatlon measure was proposed:with respect to the required remo~~I
of the eucalyptus tree row along Foothtll and Beech. For this pro~ect, atr e
replacement program w111 be established that sets a value to the trees whi h
wtll be removed. The tree replacement program will be funded by a contrtbutl n
d ' -
restricted account that can solely be used to plant replacement trees alolg
Foothill/Beech or local environs.
inventory of extsttng eucalyptus trees. The arborist's report u
completed, and a copy ts attached for reference. /~
As per the Clty Attorney, all of the trees that will be removed from Footht11
are street trees and not the property of the adjacent property owner unless t e
ortgtnal street ded carton excepted the transfer of trees in the dedtcatto
No known exceptions to a f'ull dedtcatlon have been found.
For the trees on Beech Avenue, all property owners have been contacted ar
appropriate mitigation wtlfl be done as a part of the construction agreement
for the temporary construction easements.
Thts project has encountered some resistance froe the property own~s a]on
Footht11 who restde tn the County. A number of property owner meet'mgs hay
been held wtth another one scheduled for November 29, 1989. In brtef, the
property owners with existing businesses on Foothill Boulevard have been the
most concerned about the construction of this project. Their concerns are
based upon their optnton that the project would significantly impact their
businesses vta loss of income. The property owner of Mheels, Etc., Nr. Carl
Atktnson, has indicated that unless he is cempensated for loss of bustness
revenue, he wtll take legal actton against the City.
The City Attorney's office is researching the legal issue of payments
damages for potential loss of business. Noteally, as a function of a Clty'~
police po~ers, we have a rtght to construct our works. However, the sewer ltm
project ~tll be constructed in Fmotht11 Boulevard tn Caltrans' rtght-of-~a
(vla Calftans permtt) in untncorporated County areas·
311$TiF]CATIOIh
The Ctt~ needs to. construct this 1the as soon as posstble to allow for the
orderlJ~: developeent of the North Fontana area as well as to sattsfy the
developers who have paid thetr sewer connection fees in advance towards
construCtiOn of thts 11ne,
ATI'AQ!!E]fi'S:
1. November 21, 1989 status report on Foothill/Beech
2, Negattve Declaration document
3. Arbortst report
APPE]e)~ City o~m~ontana
NOTXCE OF DETERMXMATION Engineering Division
8353 Sierra Avenue
Fontaria, CA 92335
TO: Office of Planning and Research
1400 Tenth Street, Room 121
Sacramento, CA 95814
X County Clerk
County of San Bernardino
385 N. Arrowhead Avenue
San Bernardino, CA 92415
SUBaECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with
Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code.
Project Title:
Foothill Boulevard/Beech Avenue Sewer Pro~ect
State Clearinghouse Nmmber Contact Person Telephone Mmber
Yousuf Patanwala (714) 350-7661
Project Location:
In existing right of way on northside of Foothill Boulevard
between Hemlock and Lime Avenues and on existing Beech Avenue
right of way between Foothill Boulevard and Baseline Avenue
Project Description:
To construct trunk sewer line in existing right of way of
Foothill Boulevard and Beech Avenue in the above mentioned
limits.
This is to advise that the City of Fontaria has approved the
above described project on December 5. 1989 and has made the
following determinations regarding the above described project:
1. The project will, X will not have a
significant effect on the enV~r~ment.
2. __An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for
this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this
project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
3. Hitigation measures X were, were not made a
condition of approval of the project.
4. A statement of Overriding Considerations __ was,
X was not adopted for this project.
This is to certify that the final ND with comments and
responses and record of project approval is available to the
General Public at the City of Fontana Engineering Division.
Date Received For Filing and Posting at OPR:
'*~'~/'~//'<-'/~..*-"~:' '~/~,,~ Environmental Review Officer
Signature Title
EIICALYPTUS INSPECTION
PHASE IV
FOOTHILL TRUNK SEWER
Hemloc:{ Avenue to Beech Avenue, City of Fontana
The Eucaly.~tus trees are located on the North side of Foothill Blvd. The
numbering system that fcllo~s corres.oonds to the numbering on the
accompanying Sewer Plans, Sheets 2 and 3.
A total of 22 trees were inspected. Of these 22 trees, one is a severed trur~
with basal sprouts and one tree has a DBH under 8". A total of 20 trees
reinBin with a DBH over 8" and of sufficient vitality that they could be
retained except for their proximity to the proposed construction.
1. 18" DBH
2. 22" DBH
3. 17" DBH
4. 26" DBH
5. 16" DBH
6. 19" DBH
7. 12" DBH
8. 11" DBH
9. 10" DBH
10. 7" DBH
i1. 24" DBH
12. 17" DBH Multiple trur~ wounds
13. 18" DBH Basal trun~ ~round, 12" wide
14. 16" DBH
15. 10" DBH Basal trunk %~und, 8" wide
16. 18" DBH Basal trunk wound, 14" wide
17. 18" DBH
18. 8" DBH Topped at 4' ,. Massive heartrot, Remove
19. 22" DBH Trunk wound, 7" wide
20. 14" DB}{
21. 11" DB~
22. 30" DBH
\ 12 -- The Herald-NeWs, FontaM, CA Fddly, Nov~mlxr za,
\ Public Notice Public Notice
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS CITY OF FONTANA
NAME STATEMENT FONTANA, CALIFORNIA
FIle No. 111127 NOTICE OF HEARING
NOTICE 18 HEREBY GIVEN BY
: The following person(s) 18 (are) do- TOHFE
Ihg business 'as: Peace in the Valley CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
MInistry Rehabilitation Center, 8587 FONTANATHATAPUBLICHEARINO
Palmetto Avenue, Fontaria, California WILL BE HELD TO CONSIDER AN
923.35 AMENDMENT TO THE BIRTCHER-
Peace In the Valley TRACHMAN DISPOSITON AND
.. Ministry, Inc. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
I (A Callf. Corp.) (DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT
8587 Palmetto Avenue, PROJ ECI'.)
Fontshe, California92335 NATURE OF REQUEST: TO CON.
This business is conducted by: a SIDER AN AMENDMENT TO THE
corporation BIRTCHER-TRAGHMAN DISPOSITI,
The reglstrant commenced to tran. ON AND DEVELOPMENT
8act business under the fictitious AGREEMENT (DOWNTOWN
business name or names listed above REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT).
ro
on October, 1989. LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Corns
Peace In the Valley Valley Blvd. end Sierra Ave.
Minisir'/, INC, DATE OF HEARING: December ,~
slDannyVatenzuela, 1989 {
' PLACE OF HEARI G: Y
Pastor/President N CIt ~ I
This statement was filed with theFO;nu~acnl;·..
county c,erk of .n Eernerdlno Coun-S,.,r. A
ty on October 13, 1989 TIME OF HEARING: 6:30 P.M.
CERTiFICATiON ANY INTERESTED PARTY MA'
I hereby certify that this copy is · cot- APPEAR AND PRESENT ANY ll~
rect copy of the original statement on FORMATION WHICH MAY BE O
file in my office, ASSISTANCE TO THE CiTY COUNCIl
slJuanltaHernandez IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTION
Deputy CONCERNING THIS PROJEC~
Expires October13,1994 PLEASE CONTACT THE pLANNIN'
Publish: Nov. 10, 17, 24; Dec. 1,1989 DEPARTMENT.
City COuncil
CIty of Fontaria.
~ ~ California
CITY OF FONTANA Pubfish: Nov. 24, 27, 1989
FONTANA, CALIFORNIA
NOTICE OF HEARING T 064822
NOTICE IS 'HEREBY GIVEN BY THE NOllCEOFTRUB'rEE'BOALE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TENo.:ee-2154
NOTICE
FONTANA THAT A PUBLIC HEARING YOU Nt IN DEFAULT UNDER ! A
W,LL BE HELD To coNsiDER
~SESSMENT UEN DATED Mmch 14, 989 ·
SEWER PROJECTS WHICH ARE
pROGRAMMED TO SERVE NORTH ~O%'ER~PR~*ERTY,/~IT
FONTANA AND TO CONSIDER THE PUBLICSALE, IFYoUNEED/~IE)O~LANA
RELATING TO THESE PROJECTS. LAWYER.
to serve North Fontsfie and the cownants Conditions, end R~
negative declaration relating to by J~mea 'C. Niso~ Sr. And Ju~ A. Nd~on, as
thereof. Owne~ for the ber~ffi and s~cuffiy of ~ttru~.
ENV RONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Meadows Nomeownus A.odatlon as ~ ,
The City Environmental Review Of- d~edMIrcht4,1988, andrl~)~aa
ricer has reviewed the pro act and No. 89-0936~4oftMerch la, 1ge~,S~n '
: m.e the fol,ow,ng envlro.me.ta,
BIDDER FOR ~H, A CASHIER'8
Negative Declaration RTY Foothill A
LOCATION OF PROPE
BIrd. between Cherry Ave. and Beech, STATE OR FEDERAL 8AV1NGS/d~lD LOAN
and on Beech between FOOthill and AS~OCIAllON (per/whIG It time O! / In awful
Baseline. EXact location maps on file money of the Urmed Stress) ~ In 8~ctinn
· ' DATE OF HEARING: December 5, BernardIre Co.my Co~mmu.e, 351 No Anewheed
PLACE OF HEARING: City Hall Inte~mc°"wWedtoan~n°whemW"under~l
Council Chambers, 8353 Sierra Ave.,
Forttens, California 92335
TIME OF .EA.,.G: 8: 0 P.M.
ANY INTERESTED PARTY MAY P~ Map P. ec~ded In B~k 1;. p.ge~ 62 o e~.
FORMATION WHICH MAY BE OF Re~xbe~ol~ktCoumy.
ASSiSTANCETOTHECITYCOUNCIL. The ofre~ ed~r~ and
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS deeinauon, tf e~f, of the reof p~
,, ~ CONCERNING TH IS PROJECT, ~xwe Is pumo~be to be 92o2 claus Avers.
PLEASE CONTACT THE pLANNING Fonton~C~ om~ 9233
DEPARTMENT. llablllt~ ~ ~ Info~noflo6
c, ty of Foots.c, ,o
Publish: Nov. 24, 1989 THE tmi ~o~m ol the tmpWd
PHASE III
FODTHILL TRUNK S~VER
PAGE 2
38. 8' DB}{
39. 7" DBH Undersized
40. 7" DBH Undersized
41. 6" DBH Undersized
42. 8" DBH
43. 28" DBH
44. 18" DBH
45. 4" DBH Undersized
46. Sprouts Trunk severed at grade, Remove
47. 19" DBH
48. I4" DBH
49. 9" DBM
50. Sprouts Trunk severed at grade, Remove
51. 16" DBH
52. 17" DBH
53. 6" DBH Undersized
54. 6" DBH Undersized
55. I7" DBH
56. 6" DBH Undersized
57. 20" DBH Trunk wounds
58. 17" DBM
59. 24" DB~
60. 20" DBM
61. 18" DBM Trunk wounds
62. 24" DBH
63. 13" DBH Encased in cement, Remove
64. 24" DBH Dead, Remove
EUCLALYPTUS INSPECTION
PHASE III
FOOTHILL TRUNK SEWER
Beech Avenue to Lime Avenue, City of Fontana
The EucalylDtus trees are located on the North side of Foothill Blvd. The
numbering system that follows corresponds to the numbering on the
accompanying sewer plans, Sheets 2 and 3.
A total of 64 Eucalyptus trees were inspected. Of these 64 trees, four (4)
are reconxnended for removal ( one, dead; two severed trunks; one encased
in cement), and nine (9) are under 8" DBH (Diameter Breast Height).
A total of 51 Eucalyptus are over 8" DBH and are of a condition that were
it not for the proposed construction, they could be retained.
1. 18" DBH
2. 24" DBH
3. 6" DBH Undersized
4. 12" DBH
5. 16" DBH
6. 22" DBH
7. 15" DBH
8. 9" DBH
9. 17" DBH
10. I8" DBH
11. 19" DBM Trunk wounds
12. 13" DBH Trun~ wounds
13. 17" DBH
14. 17" DBH
15. 28" DBH Trunk wounds
16. 15" DBH Trunk wound.~
17. 26" DBH
18. 22" DBH
19. 15" DBH
20. i3" DBM
21. 22" DB~
22. 11" DBM
23. 18" DB~
24. 15" DBM
2~.5. 21" Dill
26. 10"
27. 16" EM8
28. 13" DBM Trun~ wDunds
29. 11" DBM
30. 21" DEa
31. ~7" DB~
32. 20" DB~
33. 18" DB~
34. 6" DBM Undersized
35. ~. 2" DBH
36. ~4" DB~
37. 10"
PHASE II
BEECH INTERCEPTOR SEWER MAIN
PAGE 4
138. 9" DBH
139. 15" DBH
i40. 12" DBH
141. 14" DBH
142. 15" DBH
143. 15" DBH
144. 8" DBH
145. 6", 3", 5", 4" DBH Trun~ severed 2' above grade, trunk sprouts, Remove
146. 8", 6" DBH ~alti-trun}~ed (2)
147. 16" DBH Wilted, terminal dieback
148. 10" DBH 18' West of Center Line (WC/L), ELHB, Remove
149. 12" DBH
150. 10" DBH Trunk wounds
i51. 16" DBH Trunk wounds
152. 6", 6" DBH
153. I2" DBH
15.4. 7" DBH Undersized
155. 11" DBH
156. 14" DBH
157. I5", 18" DBH Multi-trlulKed (2)
158. 14" DBH 18' WC/L
159. 19" DBH 18' WC/L
160. 5" DBH Undersized
161. 10" DBH Dead, ELHB, Remove
162. 14" DBH Trunk severed 4 ' above grade, Remove
163. 20" DBH
164. 9" DBH
165. 15" DBH
166. 12" DBH
167. 10" DBH
16.8. · 9" DBH
169. 12" DBH 18' EC/L
170. 15" DBH BI~B
171. 13" DBH
172. 12" DBM
173. 14" DBM
174. 8" DBM
175. 12"
i76. 11"
177. 11" DBM
178. 18", 16" DBM M~ti-tru/lked (2)
179. 1i" .DBH EEaB
180. 10" DBH Dead, EEHB,
181. 10" DBH
182. 14" DBH Dead, ELHB,
183. 18" DBH
184. 8" DBM
185. 10" DBH
186. 12" DBH
PHASE II
BEECH INTERCEPTOR SEWER MAIN
PAGE 5
187. 13" DBH ELHt3
188. 14" DBH 20' WC/L
189. I3" DBH 19' WC/L
190o 15" DBH
191. 24" DBH
192. 9" DBH Stub-cut at base, basal sprouts 3", Remove
193. 11" DBH Trunk wounds
194. 8" DBH
195. 7" DBH Undersized
196. 7" DBH Undersized
197. 13" DBH
198. 23" DBH
199. 8" DB, H Dead, EL}{B, Remove
200. 15" DBH
201. 11" DBH Trunk: wounds, ELHB, Remove
202. 26" DBH
203. 9" DBH Dead, El/e, Remove
204. 7", 3" DBH Multi-trunked (2)
205. 9" DBH Trl/llkl cut 1' above grade, basal sprouts, R~_move
206. 12" DBH
207. 8" DBH
208. 12"
209. 11" DBH
210. 8" DBH ELHB
211. 7" DBH Unders i zed
212. 11" DBH
213. 7", 4", 3" DBH Multi-trunked (3)
214. 9" DBH Trunk wounds, terminal diebac}:, ELHB, Remove
215. 7", 8", 3" DBH M1/lti-trullKed (3), 18" WC/L
216. !4", 11", 7" DBH Multi-trunked (3), 18' WC/L
217. 10", 10" DB~ Multi-trtulXed (2), 19' WC/L
218. 18" DBH 20" WC/L
219. 10"
220. 15" DB}{ 20' WC/L
221. 13" DB~{
222. 15" DES{ 20' WC/L
223. 19" DMM 23' WC/L
224. 10", 9", 3" DBM Multi-trun~ed (3), _+20' WC/L
225. 20" E~ 20' We/L, Dead, ELHB, Remove
226. 5", 8" ~BM Stub-cut 2' above grade, 20' WC/L
227. 15" DES{ 20' WC/L
228. 15", 12" DB}{ 19' WC/L
229. 13", 8" DB}{ Multi-trun~ed (2), 19' WC/L
230. 8", 7" DBH Multi-trunK. ed (2), 19' WC/L
231. 13" 25' WC/L
232. 9", 7", 4" DB~ Multi-trunked (3), 20' I~C/L
233. 11" DB~{ 21' WC/L
234. 15",12", 9" DB~{ Multi-trunked (3), 20' WC/L
235. 11", 4" DBH Multi-trunXed (2), 22' WC/L
236. 9" DBH
237. through 245. All trees are +20' outside C/L
PP{ASE II
BEECH INTERCEPTOR SE~ER MAIN
PAGE 2
38. 15", 5" DBH Multi-trunked (2)
39. 15" DBH
40. 13" DBH
4 i. 9" DBH
42. I6" DBH Dead, Eucalyptus Long-horned Borer, Remove
43. 20" DBH
44. 14" DBH
45. 9", 3" DBH Multi-.trun3-.ed (2)
46. 3~", 3", 2" DBH Multi-.trun3(ed (3), Undersized
47. 9" DBH
48. 7", 5" DBH Multi-trun}(ed (2)
49. 14" DBH Dead, Eucalyptus Long-horned Borer, Remove
50. 13" DBH Massive terminal diebaclc, Remove
5I. 12", 9" DBH Multi-trunked (2), wilted foliage, ELHB, Remove
52. 15" DBH Terminal dieback, ELMB, Remove
53. 7" DBH E-xtren~ely Wilted, Undersized, Remove
54. 20", 14" DB~ Multi-trunKed (2), ELHB, Remove
55. 6" DB~ Undersized
56. 8" DBH Dead, PiLHB, Remove
57. 6" DB~ UndersXzed
58. 14", 6", 6" DBH Multi-t~runked (3), Dead, ELHB, Remove
59. 18" DBH Dead, ELHB, Remove
60. 9", 7", 4" DBH Multiotrun~ed (3), ELMB, Remove
61. 18" DBH TrunJ{ %Iounds, girdling wires, terminal dieback, wilted
62. 14" DBH Terminal diebacK, wilted
63. 10" DB~ Trunk wounds, wilted
64. 12" DBH Trun~ wounds, wilted
65. 9" DBH Trunk wounds, wilted
66. 13" DBH Trun~ wounds
67. 2" DBH 8 sprouts from trunk cut at grade, Undersized
68. 21" DB}{ Trun~ ~3unds, girdling wires
69. 18" DBH Trunk wounds
70. 13" DBH Tr%lnk ~)unds
71. 9" DBH Trun~ sprouts, trun/( topped at 4', Remove
72. 12" DBH Trur~ wounds
73. 17" DBM
74. 10", 5" DB~ Multi-tx%u~ed (2)
75. 5", 3" DB~ Multi-tr.an~ed (2), trunk wounds, Undersized
76. 8" DBM Dead, EI~B, Remove
77. i0", 10" DBM Multi-~rlul~ed (2)
78. 14" DBM
79. 8" DB~ Trur~k wounds
80. 11" DB~
81. 9" DB~ Trun~ wounds
82. Ll" DBH Basal sprouts, Dead, ELHB, Remove
83. 10" DE]{ Dead, ELHB, Remove
84 · 12" DBH Trunk wounds
85. 11", 14" DB~ Mul~i-~m/n~ed (2), ~runk wounds
86. 8" DB~ Trunk wo~mds
87. 11" DBH Terminal diebacK, Remove
PHASE II
BEECH INTERCEPTOR SEWER MAIN
PAGE 3
88. 18", 8" DBH Mul~i-trun~ed (2)
89. i0" DBH TrLu~k wounds, ELHB
90. i2" DBH Trunk wounds
9I. i6" DBH Trunk wounds
92.. 10" DBH Wil~ced, terminal dieback, ELHB
93. 16" DBH Trullk wounds
94. 12" DBH
95. 14" DBH Trlulk wounds, wilted
96. I0", I2" DBH Multi-trunked (2)
97. 5" DBH Undersized
98. I1" DBH Dead, ELHB, Remove
99. 15" DBH Wilt;ed, ELHB, Remove
100. 20" DBH Wilt;ed, ELHB, Remove
101. 12" DBH Trur~ wounds
102. 10", 3" DBH Mult;i-trunked (2)
103. i4" DBH Truth{ wounds, girdling wires
104. 6" DBH Unde:rs i zeal
105. 8" DBH
106. 9" DBH
107. 7", 6", 4" DBH Multi-trunked (3), suckers
108. 5", 4", 5", 2" DBH Multi-trunked (4), suckers
i09. I1" DBH
110. 9", 4", 4" DBI{ Multi-trunked (3)
111. 18" DBIt
112. 9" DBH
113. 7" DBH Undersized
114. 12" DBH Severely wilted, Remove
115. 11" DBH EL~[, Remove
ii6. 25" Dt]I{
117. 9" DBH Seve~rely wilted, Restore
118. 21" DBI{ EL~I~, R~ve
119., 9", 7" DBH Multi-trunked (2)
120., 12" DBH
121.. 8" DBH Wilted, ELiiB, Resrs~ve
122. 6" DBH Undersized
123. 9", 10", 5", 4" DEMMulti-trunked (4)
124. 7" DMM Undersized
125. 11", 6", 4" DM~{ Multi-trunked (3)
126r 6" DIM Undersized
127. 13" DMM
128. 10" DBM
i29. 8", 4" DI]I{ Multi-trun~ed (2), trun]{ wounds, EL~I~, Remove
130. 20" DBH
131. 24" DBH
132. 8" DBH
I33. 18" DBM Fire damage, basal trunk wounds, terminal diebacK, Remove
134. 14" DIll{ ELHB, Remove
135. 11" DI~I{ ELH1], Remove
136. 14", 11" DBH Multi-trunXed (2)
137. 19" DI]H
P}{ASE I
FOCYTHIT.T. ~DlqK S~R
PAGE 2
38. 12" DBH
39. 24" DBH
40. i4" DBH
41. 15" DBH
42. 40" DBH
43. 13" DBH
44. 6" DBH Undersized
45. 17" DBH
46. 13" DBH
47. 17" DBH
48. 20" DB~
49. 28" DBH Trunk wound, 4" wide
50.. 8" DBH
5i.. 26" DBH
52u 25" DBH
53. 23" DBH
54, 17" DBH Trunk wo%uld at base, 14. wide
55. I9" DBH Trunk wo~xnd at base, 24" wide
56. 19" DBH Trunk wound at base, 4" vide
57. i3" DBH
58. 18" DBH
59. 29" DBH
60. 20" DBH Trun)< wound at base, 7" wide
61. I7" DBH
EUCALYPTUS INSPECTION
PHASE II
SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
BEEC}{ INTERCEPTOR SEWER ,MAIN
Foothill Blvd. to Baseline Avenue, City of Fontana
Two hundred and forty-five (245) Eucalyptus trees are identified on the
project plans, sheets 2 through 6. The following tree numbers correspond
to the accompanying project plans.
Of the 245 trees, 21 are undersized (~ess than 8" DBM), I5 are dead,
25 are weakened and/or diseased to the point where removal is reco~nen-
ded, and 30 are located more than 16' away from the center line (C/L).
A total of 154 Eucalyptus trees are in adequate condition such that if
it were not for the sewer construction, they could remain.
1. 24" DBH
2. 15" DBH Old basal wound, 5" wide
3. 23" DBH
4. 17" DBH
5. 9" DBH
6. 20" DBH Terminal dieback
7. 11" DBH Trun~ wounds
8. 20" DBH
9. I2" DBH
10. 8" DBH
11, 25" DBH
12. 21" DBH Trunk wo~mds
13. 8" DBH Trunk wounds, Undersized
14. g" DBH
15. 14" DBH
16. 23" DBH Girdling wires
t7. 15" DBH
18. 11" DBH Girdling wires
19. 22" DBH
20. 24" DBH Girdling wires
21. 9" DBH
22. 8" DBH Girdling wires
23. 18" DBM Trun~ wo~mds
24. 13" DBM Barbed w~re
25. i3" ]MM
26. 6" D88 Girdling wire, Undersized
27. 7" EMM Undersized
28. 19", 11" DBM Multi-tr~mKed (2)
29. 22" DB~ Embedded bark, likely to split
30. 13" .DBM
31. 16", 18" DBM Multi-trimmed (2), trunk wounds
32. 6" DBH Undersize~
33. i4" DBH Girdling wire, trunk wounds
34. 25" DBH Girdling wire
35. 6" DBH Undersized
36. 16" DBM
37. 13" DBH
- NOTE: SH(~R~NG BY CONTRACTOR WHE, RE TEMPORAR',f
~ ~ CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT IS NOT
,~ /...
EUCALYPTUS INSPECTION
PHASE I
FOOTHILL TRUNK SEWER
Cherry Avenue to Hemlock Avenue, City of Fontana
The Eucalyptus trees are located on the North side of Foothill Blvd. The
numbering system that follows corresponds to the numbering on the accom-
panying Sewer Plans, Sheets 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6.
A total of 61 Eucalyptus trees Were inspected. Of these 61 trees, two
trees should be removed for safety reasons; one is dead ($9) and one (~31)
is unsafe. The remaining trees (59) are in such a condition so that
were it not for the proposed construction, they could be retained.
Of the 59 trees, six are under 8" DBH (Diameter at Breast Height), leaving
a total of 53 trees over 8" DBH of sound condition.
1. 20" DBM Trunk wound at base, 50~ girdled
2. 16" DBH
3. 43", I0" DBH Multi-trunked (2), Minor trunk wound
4. 23" DBH
5. 17" DBH
6. 23" DBH
7. 36" DBH Trunk wound at base, + 24" wide
8. 30" DEM Trunk 'wound at base, ~0" wide
9. 25" DBH Dead, Eucalyptus Long-horned Borer
10. 22", 4" DBH Multi-trunJced (2)
11.. 24" DBH
12. 19" DBH
13. 17" DB~
14. 12" DBH
15. 23" DBH
16. 40" DBH
17. 6" DBH Undersized
18. 6" DBH Undersized
19. 12" DBH
20. 7" DB/{ Undersized
21. 7" DBM Undersized
22. 19" DBH
23. 13", 9" DBH Multi-trunRed (2)
24. 14" DBH
25. 19" DI]M
26. lO" DBM
27. 9" DB8
28. 8" DiM
29. 2P' DBI{ Trun~ vaDund at base, 4" wide, 6' tall
30. 19" DBi{ Trurt~ ~3und at base, 4" wide
31. 30" DBH Over 6~ girdled at base, terminal diebacK, unsafe, remove
32. 16" DBH
33. 6" DBH Undersi:.,ed
34. 20" DBH
35. 25" DBH
36. 22" DBH
37. 36" DBH
(~ REMOVE EXISTING SEWER PLUG I EA.
EX. 6" ~ANSfT~ STEEL W~TER
~)WATER bl~ 132-00 TO 126-00 TO 13~,00
137,00 F~T~N~ F~TANA WATER CO.
WATEr CO. ' ·
~ILITY ~ '
NOTES: ..
- ~ "
NOTE: TRENCH WI~ NOT BE EXCAVATED IN
CONST~UCT~O~ E~S~E~T H~S 8EE~ ~~ , , ~ ~''
FUTU,qE STORM DRAIN
8~ECH AVE. e/,.--PROPOSF,,D SEWER UN( ~ __
!~ S/~THF,,RN PACIFIC RAILRQAO ~
//" ,
" ~ Y~~~,'~ ~'/'~ ~
.. ,.., - .~ .........
FROM BEECH TO LIME ~VENUE
Page 2
In order to insure that the trees will be planted in the
streetscape at the time Foothill Boulevard is widened to its full
width, the City of Fontaria will establish a tree program. Honey
will be placed in the tree program using the following guidelines=
1. Before the project begins, a certified arborist will verify
the number of trees, which have to be removed for the project,
along Foothill Boulevard and the proposed Beech Avenue. The
condition and trunk size of each of these trees will be
determined by the arborist.
2. For the trees which have to be removed along Foothill
Boulevard, the City will place $75.00 in the Tree Program for
every tree rated average or above with a diameter of 8" or
less. For every tree rated average or above with a diameter
of 9" or more, $300 will be placed in the Tree Fund.
3. For the trees which have to be removed for the project on
private property along the future Beech Avenue, the City will
negotiate with the private property owners. If the property
owner agrees to maintain the trees, the City will plant trees
on the private! property of the resident per the schedule
established for the trees along Foothill Boulevard.
Honey placed in this tree program will be used to plant trees along
Foothill Boulevard and vicinity where not already required by
development standards.
5.a. The removal of the Eucalyptus trees may change the number of birds
and small rodents in the area. However, with the planting of new
trees in the streetscape, the birds and small rodents may return.
~6.a. iThere will be an increase in noise level due to construction
/equipment, but will it be mitigated by enforcing state laws for
keeping their noise level within pe;'missible limits. Also, the
~' hours of construction will be limited to 7 a.m. to 6 p.m.
I~Ob~ The project may interfere with normal emergency operations. All
utility companies, Police and Fire will be notified at least a week
in advance of the section of the project on which work will be
taking place. In addition, the contractor will be required to
follow the Article 7-10 of the Standard Specification for Public
Works Construction, which addresses public convenience and safety.
Page 3
13b. Extsting parking along side of the street may be affected and it
will be mitigated through proper posting of sign indicating
approximately for what time period parking at a particular location
will not be available.
13c. It will cause substantial impact on traffic flow on Foothill
Boulevard during construction stage and to mitigate this impact,
there will be advance notice placed on the roadway to make the
people aware of the lane closures and expected date of its
returning back to normal state. Also, the contractor will follow
Caltran's temporary .detour plans for the smooth flow of traffic.
13d. Excavation of a trench in front of property may cause temporary
inconvenience to the businesses and homeowners along the project
site. In order to minimize the effect, the contractor will be
required, through project specifications and plan notes, to provide
temporary driveway access by any suitable means to the property at
all times.
13f. The closure and movement of construction equipment will increase
traffic hazards to all the road users, and this will be mitigated
through proper posting of signs according to traffic safety
standards and by proper traffic controlling devices for safe detour
of the traffic.
16. The construction of the new sewer line will provide sewer servtce
to the property owners in that areas as well as releasing
substantial pressure off the existing sewer pump at corner of Lime
Avenue and Foothill Boulevard.
APENDXX Z
Page 7
I/Z Discussion of Envtrorental Evaluation
(Narrative description of environmental impacts.)
IV. DeterminatiOn
{To be completed by the Lead Agency.)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect
on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the p~,oposed project could have a significant
.effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in
'this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached
sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARAT/ON WILL BE
PREPARED. X
:[ find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONHENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
PREPARED BY:
DATE YOUSUF'PATANNALA
CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSISTANT IZI
REVIEWED AND APPROVED
ROBERT W. WEDOLE
I~TERIN CITY ENGINEER
Hitigation Measures to all "Yes" and "Maybe" answers:
I.e. At the time of excavation unstable earth conditions will result
which will be mitigated through proper shoring procedure or by
maintaining side slopes of the trench at an angle as recommended by
soils engineer which will allow stable slopes.
1.b. Due to the excavation of the trench, soil will be disturbed and
displaced. Host of this soil will be placed back into the trench
after the placement of utility pipes. During backfilling
operation, the soil will be well compacted~ and the top of the
trench will be leveled to grade with the surrounding ground.
I.c. Topographical change is expected during construction stage only
which will diminish as the project is out of the construction
stage.
1.e. Increase in wind erosion may result due to loose excavated dirt
piled up on the side or alongside the project. This will be
mitigated through proper watering of the area under construction
stage and where ,dirt is being piled up as per standard
specification for Public Work's construction 7-8.1.
1.g. There is a possibility during construction of ground failure which
will be prevented through proper shoring of the trench walls.
2.a. The heavy equipment on the project site will temporarily disturb
the air quality of the surrounding area, but he is regulated by
Article 7-8.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Work's
Construction. To further minimize this effect, the work will not
i be carried out on days when the general air quality is said to be
· . in 1st stage smog alert.
~ 3.~ Installation of a storm drain line will benefit the general area by
allowing the storm run off water to be picked up by catch basins in
~ the side streets and reducing the surface flow on streets itself,
thus reducing chances of flooding of streets and surrounding area.
4.a. The City of Fontana recognizes and appreciates the positive effect
that the wind rows o,f Eucalyptus trees have in creating the beauty
and ambience of the City. The City encourages saving these wind
rows whenever possible. In this project, in order to provide for
publtc health and safety by the construction of sewers and storm
drains, the removal of the existing wind rows of Eucalyptus trees
is necessary on Foothill Boulevard between Cherry Avenue and LIme
Avenue and on the proposed Beech Avenue between Foothill and
Baseline. These wtnd rows lie within the existing or proposed
street right-of-way.
APPENDIX I
Page 5
:t4. Publlc Services. W111 the proposal have an effect
upon~ or result tn a need for new or altered gov-
ernmental servtces In any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection? X
b. Pollce protection? X
c. Schools? X
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
e. Halntenance of public facilities, including
roads?
f. Other governmental services? X
].5. Energ3r. Wtll the proposal resultin=
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? __ X
b. Substantial increase tn demand upon extsting
sources or energy, or requtre the development
of new sources of energy? X
].6. Utilities. W~11 the proposal result In a need for
new systems, or substantial alterations to the
following utilities= X
~7. ~m=n Itealth. Htll the proposal result in:
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)? X
b. Exposure of people to potential health
hazards? X
18. Aesthetics. ~tll the proposal result tn the
obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or wtll the proposal result In the
creation of an aesthetically offensive site open
to public view? X
19. Recreation, Will the proposal result tn an
impact upon the quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities? X
APEND:[X I
Page 6
2(3. Cultural Resources.
a. Will the proposal result in the alteration
of or the destruction of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site? X
b. Wtll the proposal result in adverse physical
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure, or object? X
c. Does the proposal have the potential to
cause a physical change which would affect
unique ethnic cultural values? X
d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious
or sacred uses within the potential impact
area? X
21. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quallty of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildltfe
species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten
to eliminate a plant or animal community, re-
duce the number or restrict the range of a rare
or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory? __ X
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve
short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term,
environmental goals? (A short-term impact on
the environment is one which occurs in a rela-
tively brief, definitive period of time while
long-term impacts will endure well into the
future.) X
c. Does the project have impacts which are
individually limited, but cumulatively con-
siderable? (A project may impact on two or
more separate resources where the impact on
each resource is relatively small, but where
the effect of the total of those impacts on
the environment is significant.) __ X
d. Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or indirectly? __ X
APPENDIX I
Page 3
g. Change in the quantity of ground waters,
either through direct additions or with-
drawals, or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavations? X
h. Substantial reduction in the amount of
water otherwise available for public
water supplies? X
i. Exposure of people or property to water re-
lated hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? X
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result
a. Change in the diversity of species, or num-
ber of any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? X
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants? X
c. Introduction of new species of plants into an
area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existing species? X
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X
5.Miml Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or num-
bers of any species of animals (birds, land
animals including reptiles, fish and shell-
fish, benthtc organisms or insects)? X
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of animals? X
c. Introduction of new species of animals into
an area, or resu)t in a barrier to the migra-
tion or movement of animals? X
d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat? __ X
6, Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels? X
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X
APPENDIX I
Page 4
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal >roduce new
light or glare? X
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result qn a sub-
stantial alteration of the present or planned
land use of an area? X
g. Matural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources? X
10, Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve:
a. A risk of an explosion or the release of
hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to, oil, pesticldes, chemicals or
radiation) in the! event of an accident or
upset conditions?' __ X
b. Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or an emergency evacuation
plan? X
11. Population, Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density,, or growth rate of the human
population of an area? X
12, Housing, Will the proposal affect existing hous-
ing, or create a demand for additional housing? X
13. Transportation/Circulation, Will the proposal
result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movmnt? X
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking? X
c. Substantial impact upon existing transpor-
tation systems? X
d. Alterations to present patterns of circula-
tion or movement of people and/or goods? X
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? __ X
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians? X
APPEM~IX I
ENYIR01I~ENTAL CHECKLIST FORR
(To Be Completed By Lead Agency)
I. Backqround
1. Name of Proponent City of Fontaria
,2. Address and Phone bber of Proponent 8353 Sierra Avenue
Fontana. California gg336
(714) 350-7610
3. Date of Checklist Subedtted September 22. 1989
4. Agency Requiring Check:list City of Fontana
5. Name of Proposal, tf applicable Foothill/Beech Sewer Pro3ect
6. Oescrtptton of Project 11 Installation of sewer line 41' from center
line on the north side of Foothill Boulevard from Cherry to Lime
Avenue and in-between 12' County and City owned strto of orooertv
designated as future Beech Avenue from Foothill to Baseline,
2) Installation of storm drain 1the 34' north of centerline of
Foothill Boulevard from Cherry to Beech Avenue. 3) Installation of
water 1the 28' north of Centerl~ne of Foothill Boulevard from Cherry
to Beech Avenue.
7. Locatton of Project 1) Sewer oroject is from Cherry to Ltme on north
side of Foothill Boulevard and between Foothill and Baseline on Beech
Avenue. 2) Storm drain is on Foothill Boulevard between Cherry and
Beech Avenue. 3) W&ter line oro.lect is from Cherry to Beech Avenue
(see attached maD).
II. Environmental Is~acts
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached
sheets.)
Yet Maybe No
1. ' Earth. Nil1 the proposal result
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in
geologic substructures?
b.. Disruptions, displacements, compactton or
overcovering of tlne sot1? X..
c. Change in topography or ground surface
relief features? X
APPENIDZX l
Page 2
d. The destruction, coverlng or modtflcatton
of any unique geologtc or physical features? X
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of
soils, etther on or off the site? _)L
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or changes In stltatton, deposition or
erosion which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake? X
g. Exposure of people or property to geologtc
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides,
mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? X
2. Air. Will the proposa!l result in:
a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration
or ambient air quality? _X_
b. The creation of objectionable odors? X
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or
temperature, or any change in climate,
either locally or regionally? X
3. Mater. Will the proposal result in:
a. Changes in currents, or the course of di-
rection of water movements, in either marine
or fresh waters? X
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage pat-
terns, or the rate and amount of surface
runoff? X
c. Alterations to the course or low of flood
waters? X
d. Change in the amount of surface water in
any water body? X
e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any
alteration of surface water quality, in-
cluding but not limited to temperature,
dissolve oxygen or turbidtry? X
f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow
of ground waters? X
APPENDIX M City of Fontana
NO~ICE OF NEGATIVE DECLA~TION Planning Department
8353 Sierra Avenue
Fontana, CA 92335
Date of Declaration: 9/22/89 Effective Date: December 5, 1989
Applicant: City of Fontana
Address: 8353 Sierra Avenue, Fo~ncana
Project Title: Env.! Log #
Foothill/Beech Sewer Project
Description of Property: Foo~thill Boulevard from Cherry AVenue to Lime
Avenue; Beech Avenue from Foothill tO Baseline
(Plans and specifications are available for public inspection at
the public counter of the Planning Department)
Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Ouality
Act of 1970 (Public Resources Code, Sections 1500. et seq), the
City of Fontana has determined that the above-referenced project
will[ not have a significant effect upon the environment. An
environmental impact report will not be required.
ApPeal Period
This decision may be appealed to the City Council by any person
aggrieved, or by an officer, board, department, or commission of
the City. Any appeal shall be filed with-in fourteen (14) days
after the publication of 'this decision or it shall be dismissed by
the City Council. The notice of Appeal shall be in writing and
shall be filed in duplicate in the office of the City Clerk upon
forms provided by the Planning Department.
Kt~_~An~erson
Manager of Planning
CONDITIONAL APPROVAL GRANTED: YES( ) NO( )
NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF DRAFT NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Notice is hereby given that The City of Fontana
has completed an Initial Study of the Foothill/Beech Sewer
project in accordance with the City's Guidelines implementing
the California Environmental Quality Act. This Initial study
was undertaken for the purpose of deciding whether the
project may have a significant effect on the environment. On
the basis of such Initial Study, the City's Staff has
concluded that the project will not have a significant effect
on the environment, and has therefore prepared a Draft
Negative Declaration. Copies of the Initial Study and Draft
Negative Declaration are on file at City Hall, 8393 Sierra
Avenue · Fontana
and are available for public review.
At its meeting on December 5 at 6:30 p.m.
the City Council will consider the project and the Draft
Negative Declaration. If the City Council finds that the
project will not have a significant effect on the
environment, it may adopt the Negative Declaration. This
means that the City Council may proceed to consider the
project without the preparation of an Environmental Impact
Report.
Any person wishing to comment on this matter should
submit such comments, in writing, to the q~ity by November 21,
1.989
Dated: /c - ~ c - ~ ~ ~_~ c~/_~t-
Staff
STATUS REPORT OF NOVEMBER 21, 1989 ON FOOTHILL/BEECH/BASELINE SEWER
To simplify the the description of the status of the Foothill/Beech/Baseline
Sewer Projects, the project background description will be divided into the
following segments:
1. Foothill Sewer - Cherry to Hemlock
Desiqn Administration: Heritage
Construction Administration: Heritage
Status: Bid awarded; CeltPans has Just approved construction between
Cherry Avenue and Redwood Avenue {no trees), but the remainder of the
project is on hold pending reinstatement of Celttans permit. Caltrans
requires environmental document on eucalyptus tree issue. City
processing mitigated negative 'declaration (ND) as required by CEQA.
Request for Council certification of NO is programmed for the
December 5, 1989 Council meeting. Notices have been sent to impacted
property owners and responsible agencies.
Riqht-of-way: None is required.
2. Foothill Sewer - Hemlock to Lime
Desiqn Enqineer: Hall & Foreman
Construction Administration: City of Fontaria
Contractinq Authority: City of Fontana (Sewer Fund)
StatuS: Project design plans and specifications are 98% complete.
The Southern Pacific Railroad permit was requested on January l, 1989;
it has not been issued to date.
Caltrans Permit: It was issued but subsequently suspended by Celttans
pending submittal of environmental documentation on eucalyptus tree
issue. The City is processing a mitigated negative declaration (ND)
as required by CEQA, The ND is to be presented to City Council on
December 5, 1989.
Right-of-Way: Six out of nineteen temporary construction easements
have been secured. The project can be constructed in existing street
right-of-way with the temporary construction easements which the City
has in place.
Property Owner Issues:: Dust control; tree removal; potential loss of
business during construction; access; compensation to property owners;
replacement of curb and gutter at ultimate location.
The contractor will be required to expedite his work (with penalties)
through property owner' work areas (Wheels, Etc.). Dust control spray
agents are being reviewed for reducing the problem of wind blown dust.
3. Beech Avenue - Foothill to Baseline
Oesiqn Enqineer: Hall & Foreman
Construction Administration: City of Fontaria
Construction Authority: City of Fontana (Sewer Fund)
Status: The project dlesign plans and specifications are 98% complete.
The Southern Pacific Railroad permit was requested on January 17, 1989
but it has not been issued to date.
Environmental: The City is processing the mitigated negative
declaration for the December 5, 1989 City Council meeting.
Riqht-of-WaY: The City has 25 of the 27 required easements.
Staff is reviewing options to implement with existing in place
construction easements. Negotiations with the property owners have
delayed the project implementation.
Property Owner Issues:: Dust control| tree removal; construction
mitigation.
4. Baseline - Beech to Almerta
Desiqn Enqineer: Madole & Associates (Presley Homes)
Construction Administration: Not dectded.
Contractinq Authority: Not decided.
Status: The project design is 25% complete. The City is negotiating
a reimbursement agreement with Presley Homes for design engineering
and project assistance (Foothill/Beech segment). Presley Homes also
ts to assist the City in securing Southern Pacific Ratlroad permit and
general project assistance.
011JER AFFECTE]) DEPARTRENTS:
St ~nature 5t ~nature
AssT.... . ~.~ .u.,~. RESOURCES
CLERK POLICE
COH. DEV. X PUBLIC NORKS
DEPUTY HGR. ' 'RDA
ECON. DEV.. i RISK HGHT..
_X_FINANCE l~ t.,~::.~ ~ ,.~':.~.-,.~--' SPEC. PROO.
AC::RW:YP:Wp
PLEASE PRINT DATE//~/~/~? , PLEASE PRINT
IF YOU ARE ~OlN(I TO TEITIFY ON ANY film OF TH! AIINDA, R.IAI!
IF YOU ARE GOING TO TESTIFY ON ANY ITEM OF THE AGENDA, !allIll' FILL OUT THIIC CARD AND HAND TO CiTY QLIRK. THII II FOR THE CITY
FILL OUT THIS CARD AND HAND TO CITY CLERK, THIS IIC FOR THE CITY CLERK'It INFORMATION ONLY IN OROIR TO AI:X~URATILY figCORD THE
CLERK'S INFORMATION ONLY IN ORDER TO ACCURATELY RECORD THE
MINUTEft.
MINUTES.
wE m. 7/fz 2z " m. 7f,4 '
AFFILIATIOR--~A/
I WISH TO TESTIFY ON AGENDA ITEM NO/~ ' ' ( ) I WIICH TO TElTIFf ON A
- L , IF A PUBLIC HEARIN~ ITIM - IN, EAI! CIRCI,I IF; OWWOIllON ON FAVOR
IF YOU ARE GOI!'~ TO T!ITII~ ON ANY film OF TH!/IINDA, Pt.lAill
IF YOU ARE GOING TO TESTIFY ON ANY ITEM OF THE AGENDA, PLEAloE
FILL OUr THIIC CARD A!IO HAND TO Crl"Y (I,!RK. THIIC II FEN THE CITY
FILL OUT THIS CARD AND HAND TO CITY CLERK. THIS IS FOR THE CITY
CLERK'S INFORMATION ONLY IN ORDER TO ACCURAT!I.Y RECORD THE
t"~yjFKr:S.INFORMATION ONLY IN ORDER TO ACCURATELY RECORD THE MINUTES.
AFFILIATi4~ (?~u_ 7T~E,M,N * - AFFILIATION CoH-.c.El, q
( ) I WISH TO TESTIFY ON AGENDA ( ) I WISH TO TEGTIFY ON AGENDA ITEM NO..
IF A PUBLIC HEARING IT - PLE CIRCLE IF' OPPOSITI FAVOR IF A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM - PLEASE CIRCLE IF' OPPOICITION DR FAVOR
EUCALYPTUS INSPECTION
PHASE I
FOOTHILL TRUNK SEWER
Cherry Avenue to 5~mlock Avenue, City of Fontana
The Eucalyptus trees are located[ on the North side of Foothill Blvd. The
numbering system that follows cerresponds to the numbering on the accom-
panying Sewer Plans, Sheets 2, ,2[, 4, 5, and 6.
A total of 61 Eucalyptus trees ~re inspected. Of these 61 trees, two
trees should be removed for safety reasons; one is dead (~9) and one (~31)
is unsafe. The remaining trees (59) are in such a condition so that
were it not for the proposed construction, they could be retained.
Of the! 59 trees, six are under 8" DBH (Diameter at Breast Height), leaving
a total of 53 trees over 8" DBH of sound condition.
1. 20" DBH Trunk wound at base, 50%girdled
2. 16" DBH
3. 43", 10" DBH Multi-trur~ed (2), Minor trunk wound
4. 23" DBH
5. 17" DBH
6. 23" DBH
7. 36" DBH Trunk wouff~d at base, + 24" wide
8. 30" DBH Trunk wound at base, ~0" wide
9. 25" DBH Dead, Eucalyptus Long-horned Borer
10. 22", 4" DBH Multi-trunked (2)
11. 24" DBH
12. ].9" DBH
13. 17" DBH
14. I2" DBH
15. 23" DBH
16. 40" DBH
17. 6" DBH' Undersized
18. 6" DBH Undersized
19. 12" DBH
20. 7" DBH Undersized
21. 7" DBH Undersized
22. 19" DBH .~
23. 13", 9" DBH Multi-trtulked (2)
24. 14" DBH
25. 19" DBH
26. 10" DBH
27. 9" DBH
28. 8" DBH
29. 21" DBH Trunk wom]d at base, 4" wide, 6' tall
30. 19" DBH Trunk wo~d at base, 4" wide
31. 30" DBH Over 6(Bgirdled at base, terminal dieback, unsafe, remove
32. 16" DBH
33. 6" DBH Undersized
34. 20" DBH
35. 25" DBH
36. 22" DBH
37. 36" DBH
PHASE I
FOOTHILL TRUNK SEWER
PAGE 2
38. 12" DBH
39. 24" DBH
40. 14" DBH
41. 15" DBH
42. 40" DBH
43. 13" DBH
44. 6" DBH Undersized
45. 17" DBH
46. 3.3" DBH
47. 17" DBH
48. 20" DBH
49. 28" DBH Trunk ~ound~. 4" wide
50. 8" DBH
51. 26" DBH
52. 25" DBH
53. 23" DBH
54. 17" DBH Trunk wound at base, 14" wide
55. 19" DBH Trunk wound at base, 24" wide
56. 19" DBH Trunk wound at base, 4" }[ide
57. 13" DBH
58. ].8" DBH
59. 29" DBH
60. 20" DBH Trunk wound at base, 7" wide
61. 17" DBH
EUCALYPTUS INSPECTION
PHASE II
SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
BEECH INTERCEPTOR SEWER MAIN
Foothill Blvd. to Baseline Avenue, City of Fontana
Two h~mdred and forty-five (245) Eucalyptus trees are identified on the
project plans, sheets 2 through 6. The following tree numbers correspond
to the! accompanying project plans.
Of the 245 trees, 21 are undersized (less than 8" DBH), 15 are dead,
25 are! weakened and/or diseased to the point where removal is recommen-
ded, and 30 are located more than 16' a~ay from the center line (C/L).
A total of 154 Eucalyptus trees are in adequate condition such that if
it were not for the sewer construction, they could remain.
1. 24" DBH
2. 15" DBH Old basal wound, 5" wide
3. 23" DBH
4. 17" DBH
5. 9" DBH
6. 20" DBH Terminal dieback
7. 11" DBH Trunk wounds
8. 20" DBH
9. I2" DBH
10. 8" DBH
11. 25" DBH
12. 21" DBH Trunk wounds
13. 8" DBH Trunk woundis, Undersized
14. 9" DBH
15. 14" DBH
16. 23" DBH Girdling wi]:es
17. 15" DBH
18. 11" DBH Girdling wires
19. 22" DBH
20. ?.4" DBH Girdling wires
21. 9" DBH
22. 8" DBH Girdling wires
23. 18" DBH Trunk wounds "~
24. 13" DBH Barbed wire
25. 13" DBH
26. 6" DBH Girdling wire, Undersized
27. 7" DBH Undersized
28. 19", 11" DBH Multi-trunked (2)
29. 22" DBH ~lbedded bark, likely to split
30. 13" DBH
31. 16", 18" DBH Multi-trunked (2), trunk wounds
32. 6" DBH Undersized
33. 14" DBH Girdling wire, trunk wounds
34. 25" DBH Girdling wire
35. 6" DBH Undersized
36. 16" DBH
37. 13" DBH
PHASE II
BEECH I~ERCEPTOR SEWER MAIN
PAGE 2
38. 15", 5" DBH Multi-trunked (2)
39. 15'" DBH
40. 13" DBH
41. 9" DBH
42. 16" DBH Dead, Eucalyptus Long-horned Borer, Remove
43. 20" DBH
44. 14" DBH
45. 9", 3" DBH Multi-tr~mked (2)
46. 3½", 3", 2" DBH Multi-tr~lnked (3), Undersized
47. 9" DBH
48. 7", 5" DBH Multi-trlmked (2)
49. 14" DBH Dead, Eucalyptus Long-horned Borer, Remove
50. 13" DBH Massive terminal dieback, Remove
51. 12" , 9" DBH Multi-trlmked (2), wilted foliage, ELHB, Remove
52. 15" DBH Terminal dieback, ELHB, Remove
53. 7" DBH ~xtremely wilted, Undersized, Remove
54. 20", 14" DBH Multi-trlmked (2), ELHB, Remove
55. 6" DBH Undersized
56. 8" DBH Dead, EL}tB, Remove
57. 6" DBH Undersized
58. 14", 6", 6" DBH Multi-trlLnked (3), Dead, ~LHB, Remove
59. 18" DBH Dead, EL}t8, Remove
60. 9", 7", 4" DBH Multi-tr~mked (3), ELHB, Remove
61. 18" DBH Trunk wo~mds, girdling' wires, terminal dieback, wilted
62. 14" DBH Terminal dieback, wilted
63. 10" DBH Trunk wo~mds, wilted
64. 12" DBH Trunk wo~mds, wilted
65. 9" DBH Trunk wo~mds, wilted
66. 13" DBH Trunk wo~mds
67. 2" DBH 8 sprouts from trunk cut at grade, Undersized
68. 21" DBH Trunk wo~mds, girdling wires
69. 18" DBH Trunk wo~mds
70. 13" DBH Trunk wo~mds
71. 9" DBH Trunk sprouts, trunk topped at 4', Remove
72. 12" DBH Trunk wo~mds .,~
73. 17" DBH
74. 10", 5" DBH Multi-tr~nlked (2)
75. 5", 3" DBH Multi-tr~unked (2), trunk wounds, Undersized
76. 8" DBH Dead, ELHB, Remove
77. 10", 10" DBH Multi-tr~mked (2)
78. 14" DBH
79. 8" DBH Trurbk wo~nlds
80. 11" DBH
81. 9" DBH Trunk ~,~o~mds
82. 11" DBH Basal sprouts, Dead, ELHB, Remove
83. 10" DBH Dead, EL}B, Remove
84. 12" DBH Trunk woLmds
85. 11", 14" DBH Multi-tr~mked (2), trunk wounds
86. 8" DBH Trunk wo~mds
87. 11" DBH Terminal dieback, Remove
PHASE II
BEECH INTERCEPTOR SEWER MAIN
PAGE 3
88. 18", 8" DBH Multi-trunked (2)
89. 10" DBH Trunk wounds, ELHB
90. 12" DBH Trunk wounds
91. 16" DBH Trunk wounds
92. 10" DBH Wilted, terminal dieback, ELHB
93. 16" DBH Trunk wounds
94. 12" DBH
95. 14" DBH Trunk mounds, wilted
96. 10", 12" DBH Multi-trunked (2)
97. 5" DBH Undersized
98. i1'' DBH Dead, E6HB, Remove
99. 15" DBH Wilted, ELHB, Remove
100. 20" DBH Wilted, ELHB, Remove
101. 12" DBH Trunk weunds
102. 10", 3" DBH Multi-trunked (2)
103. 14" DBH Trunk weunds, girdling wires
104. 6" DBH Undersized
105. 8" DBH
106. 9" DBH
107. 7", 6", 4" DBH Multi-trunked (3), suckers
108. 5", 4", 5", 2" DBH Multi-trunked (4), suckers
109. 11" DBH
110. 9", 4", 4" DBH Multi-trunked (3)
111. 18" DBH
112. 9" DBH
113. 7" DBH Undersized
114. 12" DBH Severely wilted, Remove
115. 11" DBH ELHB, Remove
116. 25" DBH
117. 9" DBH Severely wilted, Remove
118. 21" DBH ELHB, Remove
119. 9", 7" DBH Multi-trunked (2)
120. ].2" DBH
121. 8" DBH Wilted, ELHB, Remove
122. 6" DBH Undersized ~
123. 9", 10", 5", 4" DBHMulti-~].~ulked (4)
124. 7" DBH Undersized
125. 11", 6", 4" DBH Multi-t]o/nked (3)
126: 6" DBH Undersi:~ed
127. 13" DBH
128. 10" DBH
129. 8", 4" DBH Multi-t].lLnked (2), trunk wounds, ELHB, Remove
130. 20" DBH
131. 24" DBH
132. 8" DBH
133. 18" DBH Fire damage, basal trunk wounds, terminal dieback, Remove
134. 14" DBH ELHB, ReJmDve
135. 11" DBH ELHB, Re3~ove
136. 14", 11" DBH Multi-t].nlnked (2)
137. 19" DBH
PHASE II
BEECH INTERCEPTOR SEWER MAIN
PAGE 4
138. 9" DBH
139. 15" DBH
140. 12" DBH
141. 14" DBH
142. 15" DBH
143. 15" DBH
144. 8" DBH
145. 6", 3", 5", 4" DBH Trunk severed 2' above grade, trunk sprouts, Remove
146. 8", 6" DBH Multi-trunked (2)
147. 16" DBH Wilted, terminal dieback
148. 10" DBH 18' West of Center Line (IWC/L), ELHB, Remove
149. 12" DBH
150. 10" DBH Trunk wounds
151. 16" DBH Trunk wounds
152. 6" , 6" DBH
153. 12" DBH
154. 7" DBH Undersized
155. 11" DBH
156. 14" DBH
157. 15", 18" DBH Multi-trunked (2)
158. 14" DBH 18' ~2/L
159. 19" DBH 18' ~2/L
160. 5" DBH Undersized
161. 10" DBH Dead, ELHB, Remove
162. 14" DBH Trunk severed 4' above grade, Remove
163. 20" DBH
164. 9" DBH
165. 15" DBH
166. 12" DBH
167. 10" DBH
168. 9" DBH
169. 12" DBH 18' E~.~/L
170. 15" DBH ELHB
171. 13" DBH
172. 12" DBH ELHB -,~
173. 14" DBH
174. 8" DBH
175. 12" DBH
176. 11" DBH
177. 11" DBH
178. 18", 16" DBH Multi-trunked (2)
179. 11" DBH ELHB
180. 10" DBH Dead, ELHB, Remove
181. 10" DBH
182. 14" DBH Dead, ELHB, Remove
183. 18" DBH
184. 8" DBH
185. 10" DBH
186. 12" DBH
PHASE II
BEECH INTERCEPTOR SEWER MAIN
PAGE 5
187. 13" DBH ELHB
188. 14" DBH 20' WC/L
189. 13" DBH 19' WC/L
190. 15" DBH
191. 24" DBH
192. 9" DBH Stub-cut at base, basal sprouts 3", Remove
193. 1I" DBH Trunk wounds
194. 8" DBH
195. 7" DBH Undersized
196. 7" DBH Undersized
197. 13" DBH
198. 23" DBH
199. 8" DBH Dead, ELH]B, Remove
200. 15" D~H
201. 11" DBH Trunk wounds, ELH]~, Remove
202. 26" DBH
203. 9" DBH Dead, ]~HB, Remove
204. 7", 3" DBH Multi-trunked (2)
205. 9" DBH Trunk cut 1' above grade, basal sprouts, Remove
206. 12" DBH
207. 8" DBH
208. 12" DBH
209. 11" DBH
210. 8" DBH ELHB
211. 7" DBH Undersized
212. 11" DBH
213. 7", 4", 3" DBH Multi-trLuLked (3)
214. 9" DBH Trunk wounds, terminal dieback, ELHB, Remove
215. 7", 8", 3" DBH Multi-trunked (3), 18" WC/L
216. !4", 11", 7" DBH Multi-trunked (3), 18' WC/L
217. 10", 10" DBH Multi-trunked (2}, 19' WC/L
218. 18" DBH 20" WC/L
219. 10" DBH
220. 15" DBH 20' WC/L
221. 13" DBH .~
222. 15" DBH 20' WC/L
223. 19" DBH 23' WC/L
224. 10", 9", 3" DBH Multi-trunked (3), +20' WC/L
225. 20" DBH 20' WC/L, Dead, ELHB, Remove
226. 5", 8" DBH Stub-cut 2' above grade, 20' WC/L
227. 15" DBH 20' WC/L
228. 15", 12" DBH 19' WC/L
229. 13", 8" DBH MuZti-trunked (2), 19' WC/L
230. 8", 7" DBH Multi-t. rur~ed (2), 19' WC/L
231. 13" 25' WC/L
232. 9", 7", 4" DBH Multi-t.runked (3), 20' WC/L
233. 11" DBH 21' WC/L
234. 15",12", 9" DBH Multi-trunked (3), 20' WC/L
· 235. 11", 4" DBH Multi-trunked (2), 22' WC/L
236. 9" DBH
237. through 245. All trees are +20' outside C/L
EUCKSYPTUS INSPECTION
PHASE III
FOOq~{ILL TRUNK SEWER
Beech Avenue to Lime Avenue, City of Fontana
The Eucalyptus trees are located on the North side of Foothill Blvd. The
numberin~ system that follows ~3rresponds to the numbering on the
accompanying sewer plans, Sheets 2 and 3.
A total of 64 Eucalyptus trees were inspected. Of these 64 trees, four (4)
are recommended for removal ( one, dead; two severed trunks; one encased
in c~nent), and nine (9) are under 8" DBH (Diameter Breast Height).
A total of 51 Eucalyptus are over 8" DBH and are of a condition that were
it not for the proposed construction, they could be retained.
1. 18" DBH
2. 24" DBH
3. 6" DBH Undersized
4. 12" DBH
5. 16" DBH
6. 22" DBH
7. 2/5" DBH
8. 9" DBH
9. ~[7" DBH
10. 18" DBH
11. 19" DBH Trunk wounds
12. 13" DBH Trunk wounds
13. 17" DBH
14. 17" DBH
15. 28" DBH Trunk wounds
16. 15" DBH Trunk wounds
17. 26" DBH.
18. 22" DBH
19. 15" DBH
20. 13" DBH
21. 22" DBH
22. 11" DBH ~.
23. 18" DBH
24. 15" DBH
25. 21" DBH
26. 10" DBH
27. 16" DBH
28. 13" DBH Trunk wounds
29. 11" DBH
30. 21" DBH
31. 17" DBH
32. 20" DBH
33. 18" DBH
34. 6" DBH Undersized
35. .~ 2" DBH
36. 24" DBH
37. 10" DBH
PHASE III
FOOq~ILL TRUNK SEWER
PAGE 2
38. 8" DBH
39. 7" DBH Undersized
40. 7" DBH Undersized
41. .5" DBH Undersized
42. 8" DBH
43. 28" DBH
44. 18" DBH
45. 4" DBH Undersized
46. Sprouts Trunk severed at grade, Remove
47. 19" DBH
48. 14" DBH
49. 9" DBH
50. Sprouts Trunk severed at grade, Remove
51. 16" DBH
52. 17" DBH
53. 6" DBH Undersized
54. 6" DBH Undersized
55. 17" DBH
56. 6" DBH Undersized
57. 20" DBH Trunk wounds
58. 17" DBH
59. 24" DBH
60. 20" DBH
61. 18" DBH Trunk wounds
62. 24" DBH
63. 13" DBH Encased in cement, Remove
64. 24" DBH Dead, Remove
EUCALYPTUS INSPECTION
PHASE IV
FOOTHILL TRUNK SEWER
Hemlock Avenue to Beech Avenue, City of Fontana
The E~calpL3tus trees are located on the North side of Foothill Blvd. The
numbering system that follows corresponds to the numbering on the
accoHpanying Sewer Plans, Sheets 2 and 3.
A total of 22 trees ~ere inspected. Of these 22 trees, one is a severed trunk
with basal sprouts and one tree! has a DBH under 8". A total of 2J~ trees
remain with a DBH over 8" and of sufficient vitality that they could be
retained except for their proximity to the proposed construction.
1. 18" DBH
2. 22" DBH
3. 17" DBH
4. 26" DBH
5. 16" DBH
6. 19"' DBH
7. 12~' DBH
8. 11" DBH
9. 10" DBH
10. 7" DBH
11. 24" DBH
12. 17" DBH Multiple trunk wounds
13. 18" DBH Basal trunk wou~xd, 12" wide
14. 16" DBH
15. 10" DBH Basal trup3~ wound, 8" wide
16. 18" DBH Basal trunk wound, 14" wide
17. 18" DBH
18. 8" DBH Topped at 4', Massive heartrot, Remove
19. 22" DBH Trunk wound, 7" wide
20. 14" DBH
21. 11" DBH
22. 30" DBH
O'he :Planning ssociales
Jonathan PatRe, Inc.
Hardy M. Strozier, Ine.
3151 AIRWAY AVENUE, SUITE R-1
COSTA MESA. CALIFORNIA 92628
October 3, 1989
Ns, Lisa DonnelZ, St, Planner
CITY OF FONTANA
8353 Sierra Avenue
Fontana, CA 92335
Dear MS. Donnell:
Thank you for our meeting last week regarding the
environmental studies for the sewer expansion projects.
I indicated to you that I would provide information
regarding both Environmental Officers for the County of
San Bernardino and Cal Trans District 8. They are as
follows:
1. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Environmental Analysis Team
385 N. Arrowhead Avenue, 3rd. Floor
San Bernardino, Ca 92415-0182
Attention: Paul Kielhold
(Telephone: (714) 387-4146)
2. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
District #8
247 West, 3rd. Street
P.O. Box 231
San Bernardino, CA 92402
Attention: Mr. Steve Keel
(Telephone: (714) 383-4108)
Please let me know if you need any help in the review
or critique.
Har~d~. StroZi~er, AICP
co: Paul Ireland
Rudy Garcia
A1 Uman
Attn: Hazel Put~
P.O. Box 426
Fon'tana, CA 92335
Fontana Mater Company 714-822-2201
Attn: Bruce E. Cash
P.O. Box 987
Fontaria, CA 92335
San Bernardtrio County Department of 7]4-387-4692
Environmental Health
Attn: Mr. Paul Ryan
· 385 N. Arrowhead Avenue
San Bernardtno, CA 92415-0160
San Bernardtno County Department of 714-387-2623
Transportation, Flood Control and A~rports
Attn: Mr. Kenneth Miller
Dtrector of Transportation and Flood Control
825 least Third Street
San iBernardtno, CA 92415-0810
San IBernardtno County Engineering Contract 714-387-276g ~
Servtces
Attn: Mr. Ttm Kelley
825 least 3rd Street
San IBernardtno, CA 92415-0834
San IBernardtno County!Land Management 714-387-4165
D,epartment, Office of Planntng
Attn: Senior Planner, Mest Valley Planning Team
385 North Arrowhead Avenue
San IBernardtno, CA 92415-0183
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA. ~SSOC
OMNITRONS
1700 West Fifth Street 600 South Commonwealth
San Bernardino, CA 92411 Suite 1000
Los Angeles, CA 90005
PACIFIC BELL
· Jackie F. Denault SOWJTItB~N CALIFORNIA
3939 East Coronado Street
Second Floor Folt Of~oe BOx 782
Anaheim, CA 92807 RfaltO, C3[ 92376
193-391-017
Pa~NCMO CUCAMONGA
Planning Department
Poet Office BOx 807 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 570 West Fourth Street
San Bemardino, CA 92401
SAN BAG
Wee MoDehie1, Exe~utive Director :.-
334 Welt 3~ Street, Suite 401
San Bernardino, CA 92410 SOUTHERN PACIFIC LAND COMPANY
% Tax Col~an~ Southern Peu. Tran.
I Harket Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
194-381-002
SAN BER~ARDINO COglITY
t Street SOUTH COAST A~ QUALITY
, CA 93415 Management District
.: .,- .- "T-- ~ .. ~9150 East Flair Drive
E1 Monte, CA 91731
,--' Secretary, M ager
' P.O. Box O0
" Founta ~28 ~
Riverside County E od Control 7
1995 Market Str t
San Bernardino County Department of 714-387-4692
Environmental Health
Attn: Mr. Paul Ryan
385 N. Arrowhead Avenue
San Bernardino, CA 92415-0160
San Bernardtno County Department of 714-387-2623
Transportation, Flood Control and Airports
Attn: Mr. Kenneth Miller
Director of Transportation and Flood Control
825 East Third Street
San Bernardino, CA 92415-0810
San Bernardino County Engineering Contract 714-387-2769 .
Services
Attn: Mr. Tim Kelley
8Z5 East 3rd Street
San Bernardino, CA 92415-0834
San Bernardino County Land Management 714-387-4165
Department, Office of Planning
Attn: Senior Planner, West Valley Planning Team
385 North Arrowhead Avenue
San Bernardtno, CA 92415-0183
San Bernardino ley Municipal Water
District
Attn: Mr , Louis Fletcher
General anager
Regional Wm~lklr qu ty ~ontrol Board
Santa Ana R~ 8 0
Attn: ~r. J. An ew $chlange
Manager~
3500 Tyler Seet
Riversial ,
;:~unt:Y of San Bern ~no 714-383-1918
,,-~:ard of Superv ors
/ Attn: Jon M els
~..,l-.:" County Gov nment Center
I 714-962-2411
County Sanira n Districts of range County
28
Eastern Munici Water District 714-766-1810
Attn: Don S wart
P.O. Box 8
Fontana Historical Society 714-823-1733
Attn: Hazel Putnam
P.O. Box 426
Fontana, CA 92335
Fontaria Water Company 714-822-2201
Attn: Bruce E. Cash
P.O. Box 987
Fontana, CA 92335
Jurupa Community Se, r-vfE~ZcesD'~strict ~4
Attn: John
General anaSc~
dM,a~ 92509
Riversi e
Metropolitan Water Dist t of Southern
California
Attn: Mr. Ed J. rnhill
Manager of Envir mental Stud es and Water
C~nservatio
1111 West Su set Blvd.
Los Angel~iaW"d~fEeir~n~
Native American rttage Comm.
Attn:B WilliC A.T~oh~son i
915 Capito all, Room 288
Sacram
Office of Htstor Preservation
Attn: Hans Kr tzberg
Orange County Envtro ental Hanagement . 714-B,3441~3
Agenc~i
Attn: Mr. MJc e uane
Hana,ger of Jro~m~ntal and Special Projects
ONTARIO P NIN~~PARTMEN'.e SECRETARY F OURCES
SIMON, NA A,, · MAYOR
OMNITRONS
1700 West Fifth Street m 92316
San Bernardino, CA 92411
PACIFIC BELL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOC
· Jackie F. Denault GOVERNMENT
3939 East Coronado Street Attention: Clearinghouse
~'~" Second Floor 600 South Commonwealth
· Anaheim, CA 92807 Suite 1000
Los Angeles, CA 90005
RANC~{O CUCAMONGA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Post Office Box 807 Nest Office Box' 788
-- Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Rialto, CA 92376
193-391-017
SALDIVAR, OT D SARAH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
w 11290 Si ra enue EDISON
,oct o.ic.
I ~. Rialto, CA 92376
194-391-021
SAN BAG SOUTHERN RNIA
w . Wes McDaniel, Executive Director EDISON
334 West 3rd Street, Suite 401 Eost O Ec. 76788
San Bernardtrio, CA 92410
EDISO MP
w Dolores Caz~e:
" Second Flc~r
~ ICIPAL ~
.Off Bo 788
Rt4 _t
*~
SOUTHERNCALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY Sn~~
WALTON, JOHN . ETAL
570 West Fourth Street % Stonehil evelopment
· a
194~-007
,~SOUTHE1LN PACIFIC LAND COMPANY WALTON, JOHN · ETAL
% Tax Company Southern Pac. Tran. % Stonehil velopmentI
i Market Street 8235 Sis Avenue
· San Francisco, CA 94105 Fontaria CA 92335
194-381-002 194- -
{OUTH COAST A~ QUALITY
WARE, DONALD & MARILYN
Brian Farris 11262 Sierr Avenue
Fontana 92335
Management District
9150 East Flair Drive 25
1 Monte, CA 91731
STATE CLEANING SE
WEST SAN BE DINO COUNTY
Bruce Walt
Water Dis
Office o lanning and Research Post Of ce Box 188
1400 nth Street, Room 12:L Ria . ' ~.7
S 4
'
STON~HILL D PMENT i WOLFINBAR'
Leroy L. S z , ~ :' -. :r': ~ 9g~4. Ch Avenue
Preskden ' F
8253 S rra Avenue .. -:
TOK~31~RA, LBERT L e~
10820 N ~ Avenue
Michael G. lker, Director'
825 East 'ird Street, Room 100
Post Of Ce Box
Post Offi BoX 818
Mecca, 92254
194- -
-.,
4-4
APPflI)IX I
(To Be Completed By Lead Agency)
I. Backqround
1. lass of Frolxmnt ~ !~ '~ 0F ~'
2. AddressandFhonelmberofProlm,ent
· Date of Checklist $ubBttted
Agency Requiting Checklist '!-'l
' ..~'S,1 Name of Proposal, tf applicable
IMscrtptton ot' PPoJecl~ ,T N~n~t~-,~-~
(~planattons o~ all "~es" and "m~e" ans~Ps ape Pequtr~ on a~taehed
sheets. )
~ ~ N~
1. R~. ~tll the proposal result ~n=
a. Unstable earth conditions
g~logtc substructures?
b.Disruptions. dtsplac~nts. c~pactton or
overcovering of the sot17
c.Change tn toNgraphy or ground surface
,ellef fettures?
APPENDIX
Page 2
d. The destruction,, covering or modification
of any unique geologic or physical features?
e. Any Increase tn wtnd er water eroston of
soils, etther on or off the site?
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in siltatton, deposition or
ePoslon whtch may modtfy the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet o,r lake?
g. Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslldes,
' mudslldes, ground failure, or stmllar hazards?
2. Atr. Will the proposal result in:
a. Substantial air .emissions or deterioration
or ambient air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors?
c. Alteratlon of atr movement, moisture, or
temperature, or any change in climate,
either locally or regionally?
3. Mater. Wtll the proposal result in:
a. Changes in currents, or the course of
rection of water movements, in either marine
or fresh waters? '
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage pat-
terns, or the rate and amount of surface
runoff?
c. Alterations to the course ow~low of flood
waters?
d. Change in the amount of surface water in
any water body?
e. Discharge into surface waters, or tn any
alteration of surface water quality, in- ' '
cludtng but not limited to temperature,
dissolve oxygen or turbidity?
f.Alteration of the direction or rate of flow
of ground waters?
APPENDIX
Page 3
g. Change in the quantity of ground waters,
either through direct additions or with-
drawals, or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavations?
h. Substantial reduction in the amount of
water otherwise available for public
water supplies?
i. Exposure of peo;ple or property to water re-
lated hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? /'
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or num-
ber of any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic p'lants)? j
b. Reductto~ of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants? J ..
c. Introduction of new species of plants into an
area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural cro~?. ~-~
5. Anise1 Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or num-
bers of any species of animals (birds, land
animals including reptiles, fish and shell-
fish, benthtc organisms or insects)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of animals?
c, Introduction of new species of animals into
an area, or result in a barrier to the migra-
tion or movement of animals?
d.Oetertoratton to existing fish or wtldltfe
habitat?
6, Noise. Will the proposal result in: ' ?
a. Increases in existing noise levels? v/' . ....
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
APPENDZX Z
Page 4
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new
light or glare?
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a sub-
stantial alteration of the present or planned
land use of an area?
9. Matural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
10. Risk of Upset, Will the proposal involve:'
a. A risk of an explosion or the release of
hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an accident or
upset colqdttions?
b. Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or an emergency evacuation
plan?
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate of the human.
population of an area'?
12, Housing, Wtll the proposal affect extsttng hous-
ing, or create a demand for additional housing?
3[3. Transportation/CIrculation, Will the proposal
result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
c. Substantial impact upon existing transpor-
tation systems?
~ Alterations to present patterns of circula-L
' tion or movement of people and/or goods?' '
e. Alterations to waterborne. rail or air traffic?
~f.i, Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicycltsts or pedestrians?
APPENDZX
Page
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered gov-
ernmental services in any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities, tncludlng
roads?
f. Other governmental services?
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existtrig
sources or energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy?
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result tn a need for
]1. in Health. Will the proposal result ~n:
a.Creatton of any health hazard or potential
heatth hazard (excluding mental health)?
b. Exposure of people to potential health
hazards?
18. Aesthetics. t4tll the proposal result tn the
obstruction of any Scenic vtsta o~ view open to
the public, or will the proposal result tn the
creatton of an aesthe!Hcally offensive stte open
to publlc vtew?
19. Iicreattoe. ~tll the proposal result in an
impact upon the quality or quantity of extsttmJ.,
recreational opportunities?
20. Cultural Resources.,
a, Will the p~oposal result tn the alteration
of or the destruction of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
APPEND1X
Page
b. MIll the proposal result tn adverse physical
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
htstortc butldlng, structure, or object?
c. Does the proposal have the potentlal to
cause a physical change which would affect
unique ethnic cultural values?
d. IHll the proposal restrict existing religious
or sacred uses within the potential impact
area?
-21. I!andatoryFtndings of Significance.
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quallty of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wtldlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten
~ to eliminate a plant or animal. cemuntty, re-
duce the number or restrtct the range of a rare
: or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major period~ of
California history or prehtstory? ~-...
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve
short-term, to the d~sadvantage of long-te~f('
envtrordaental goals? (R short-term tepact on
the envtrordnent is one which occurs in a rela-
tively brtef, definitive period of ttme whlle
long-term Impacts w11~1 endure well tnto the
future.)
c. Does the project have tmpacts whtch are
Individually 11mired, but cueulattve]y con-
sidetable? (A project mey tepect on two or
mere separate resources where the tmpact on
each resource ts relatively seal1, but where
the effect of the total of those impacts on
the envtrommnt ts significant.) __
d. Does the project have environmental effects
which wtll cause substantial adverse effects
on human betrigs, etther dtrectly or indirectly?
ill DIscussion ofF e v t_ eatel Evaluation
(Narrative description of envtronmntal impacts.)
APPENDIX ! __ __
Page 7
(To be completed by the Lead Agency.)
On the basts of thts fntt~al evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect
on the envfronment, and a NEGATZVE DECLARAT/ON w~11 be prepared.
I ftnd that' although the proposed project could have a significant
effect on the environment, there w111 not be a significant effect tn
thts case because the mitigation measures described on an attached
sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATZVE DECLARATZON WiLL BE
PREPARED.
! flnd the proposed project HAY have a significant effect on the
envlronment, and an ENVIRONHENTAL IHPACT REPORT ts required.
/ / '
DATE SIGNATURE
Hittgatton Heasures to all "Yes" and "Haybe" answers:
Z.a. At the time of excavation unstable earth conditions wtll result
which w111 be mitigated through proper shoring procedure or by
maintaining stde slopes of the trench at an angle as reconanended by
sotls engtneer whtch w~11 allow stable slopes.
1.b. Due to the excavation of the trench, sotl w~11 be disturbed and
displaced. Host of this sotl will be placed back tnto the trench
after the placement of uttl~ty pipes. Durtng backfilling
operation, the so~l will be well compacted; and the top of the
trench will be leveled to grade with the surrounding ground.
1.c. Topographtcal change ts expected during construction stage only
whtch will dtmtntsh as the project ts out of the construction
stage.
I.e. Increase tn w~nd erosion may result due to loose excavated dirt
ptled up on the side or alongside the project. This wtll be
mitigated through proper watertng of the area under constructlon
stage and where dtrt is being ptled up as per standard
specification for Public Nork's construction
Z.g. There tsa possibility during construction of ground failure whtch
wtll be prevented through proper shoring of the trench walls.
2.a. The heavy equipment on the project site will temporarily disturb
the air qualtty of the surrounding area, but he is regulated by
Arttcle 7-8.2 of the Standard Specifications for Publlc Nork's
Construction. To further minimize this effect, the work wtll not
be carried out on days when the general atr quallty ts satd to be
tn Zst stage smog alert.
3.b. Installation of a storm dratn line wtll benefit the general area by
allowing the storm run off water to be picked up by catch basins in
the side streets and reductng the surface flow on streets ttself,
thus reducing chances of floodtng of streets and surrounding area.
4.a. The Ctty of Fontaria recognizes and appreciates the postttve effect
that the wtnd rows of Eucalyptus trees have in creattng the beauty
and ambience of the City. The Ctty encourages savtng these wind
'7 rows whenever possible. In this pro3ect/tn order to provide for
public health and safety by the construction of seers and storm
dratns, the removal of the extstlng wind rows of Eucalyptus trees
on Footht11 Boulevard between Cherry Avenue and Lie Avenue and on
the proposed Beech Avenue between Foothill and Basellne
~"' ~Y These wtnd rows lte wtthtn the existing or proposed
street right-of-way.
Page 2
will
be placed tn the tree~lI~using the following guidelines:
i. Before the project begins, a certified arbortst will verify
the number of l~ees~along Foothill Boulevard and the proposed
Beech Avenu~ ch~have to be removed for t~e pro3ec~ The
condition an~unk size of each of these trees ~tll be
determined b7 the a~boMst.
2. For the t~ees ~htch have ~o be removed along~th~
rated average or above wttha dtamter of 8"
less. For every tree rated average or above vtth a dtameter
of 9" or more, $300 vtll be placed tn the Tree Fund.
3. For the trees whtch have ~o be r~ved for the pro3ect on
prlvate property along the future Beech~venue, the Ctty wtll
negotiate wtth the prtvate property o~ers. if the property
o~er agrees to matnta~n the trees, the Ctty wtll plant ~rees
on the prlvate property of the resident per the schedule
establlshed for the trees along Footht]l Boulevard.
Honey placed in ~hts tree~ ibm used ~o plan~ ~rees along
~~ Footht]l Boule~where not already requtred by develop~nt
standar,s. I~e tree fund cQuld also bc us~ to prQserve 8nether
Eucalyptus Tree wi.d r~s ~n ~ ~oc3t~Gn ~u~tab]e for presecv~n.
Noncy ~uld be added to ~ts tree fund from other development
roJscts to help establish a source of funds to mathtat. ~,~
~ontana's and/or untque tr~s.
hl~tortc
5.a. The r~va3 of the Eucalyptus trees ma~ change the n~be~ of btrds
~ and~a]3 rodents ~n the area. H~ever, with the planting of new
trees tn the streetscape, the b~rds and sma31 rodents ma~ return.
6.a. There wM] be~ncrease ~n no~se ]eve3 due to construction
equ~nt. but wt]~ ~t be mitigated b~ enforcing state laws for
keeping thet~ noise level ~tth~n permissible ]tmtts. Also, the
hours of construction ~t]] be }~mited to 7 a.m. to 6 p.m.
~Ob. The p~o~ect may ~nterfere wtth norma3 ~rgenc~ operations. A]~
utfitt~ c~pan~es, Police and F~re ~]3 be nottried at ]east a
tn advance of the section of the pro~ect on ~hich ~ork wt]] be
taking piece. ~n addltlon, the contractor .tl] be requtred to
fo]]o~ the Art~c]e 7-]0 of the Standard Specification for Pub3~c
~orks Construction, which addresses pub]tc convenience and safety.
Page 3
].3b. Existing parking along side of the street may be affected and it
will be mttlgated through proper posting of stgn indicating
approximately for what time pertod parking at a particular locatloS/
will not be available.
13c, It will cause substantial tmpact on traffic flow on Foothill
the lane closures and expected date of its returning back to normal
state. Also, the contractor will follow Caltran's temporary detour
plans for the smooth flow of traffic.
13d. Excavation of~trench in~of property may cause temporary
inconvenience to the businesses and homeowners along the project
site. In order to mintmtze the effect, the contractor will be
required, through prod,act specifications and plan notes, to provide
temporary driveway access by any suitable means to the property at
al1 times.
13f. The closure and movement of construction equipment will increase
traffic hazards to all the road users, and this w111 be mitigated
through proper posting of signs according to traffic safety
standards and by proper traffic controlling devices for safe detour
of the traffic.
16. The construction of~new sewer 1the will provide sewer servlce to
the property owners in that areas as well as releasing substantial
pressure off the existing sewer pump at corner of Ltme Avenue and
Foothill Boulevard.
APPE!I)IX I
ENVIROIIENTAL CHECKLIST FOIl
(To Be Completed By Lead Agency)
2. Address and Fhone Iraher of Prom t -~ 5 ~_
3. Date of Checklist Submitted q I z~t
4. Agency RequtrJn9 Checklist ~ff'F ~ .',~r~:.
.~'~..~5. Name of Proposal, ff applicable ~F¢~,!~. / L~
· 4.,., 7. Location of ProJecl~.~3~Lf/~r~l IJB, o~ ~. LI~'/;~_,'
(~planatlons of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached
sheets. )
Yes Maybe NO
1. Ea~, Ntll the proposal result ~n:
a. Unstable earth conditions or tn changes tn
geologic substructures? - t --
b. Dtsruptfons, d!splacents, cmpactton or
overcovering of the sot17
c. Change tn topography or ground surface
re1 tef features?
APPENDIX I
Page 2
d. The destruction, covering or modification
of any unique geo'logid or phystcal features?
e. Any increase in wind.or water erosion of
soils, either on oroffthe site?
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or
erosion which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
g. Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides,
' mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards?
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
a. Substantfal air emissions or deterioration
or ambient air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors?
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or
temperature, or any change in climate,
either locally or regionally?
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
a. Changes in currents, or the course of di-
rection of water movements, in either marine
or fresh waters?
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage pat-
terns, or the rate and amount of surface
runoff?
c. Alterations to the course o~e-Zlow of flood
waters?
d. Change in the amount of surface water in
any water body?
e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any
alteration of surface water quality, in-
cluding but not ltmtted to temperature,
dissolve oxygen or turbidity?
f.Alteration of the direction or rate of flow
of ground waters?
APPENDZX T
Page 3
g. Change in the quantity of ground waters,
etther through direct additions or with-
drawals, or through interception of an
aqutfer by cuts or excavations?
h. Substantial reduction in the amount of
water otherwise available for public
Water supplies?
t. Exposure of people or property to water re-
lated hazards such as floodtng or ttdal waves?
4. Plant Life. Wtll the proposal result
a. Change tn the diversity of species, or num-
ber of any spectes of plants (including trees,
shrubs, grass, crops. and aquattc plants)?
~ b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?
?
c. Zntroductton of new spectes of plants taro an
area, or tn a barrier to the normal replentsh-
eent of extsttng spectes?
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural cro~?.
5. Artteal Ltfe. Wtll the proposal result tn:
a. Change in the diversity of spectes, or num-
bers of any spectes of antmals (birds, land
animals Including reptiles, ftsh and shell-
ftsh, benthtc organisms or Insects)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any untque,
rare or endangered spectes of anlmals?
c. introduction of new spectes of animals into
an area, or result tn a barrter to the migra-
tion or movement of animals?
d.Deterioration to extsttng ftsh or wtldltfe
hab4tat?
6. Iletse. Wtll the proposal result
a. Increases tn extsttng noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
APPENDZX ! ~
Page 4
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new
light or glare?
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a sub-
stanttal alteration of the present or planned
land use of an area?
g, Natural Resources, Nil1 the proposal result
a. increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
1,0, Risk of Upset. ~tll tlhe proposal involve:'
a. A risk of an explosion or the release of
hazardous substances (including, but not
ltmtted to, otl, 3~esttctdes, chemicals or
radiation) tn the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
b. Poss4ble interference wtth an emergency
response plan or an emergency evacuation
plan?
11. Population. ~tll the proposal alter the location,
dlstrtbutton, denslty, or growth rate of the human
population of an area?
12.Housing. Ntll the proposal affect existtrig hous-
ing, or create a demand for additional housing?
13.Transportatton/Clrculal;to~. Wt11 the proposal
result
a. Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement?
b. Effects on extstlng parktng facilities, or
demand for new par'king?
c,Substantial tmpact upon extsttng transpor-
tation systems?
~.~ Aaterat~ons to present patterns of c~rcula-~
tton or movement of people and/or goods?' '
e. Alterations to waterborne, rat1 or
~.f.~' increase tn trafftc hazards to motor vehicles,
btcycltsts or pedestrians?
.... to DuDIlC vlew7 ~
APPENDxX Z ~
Page 5
14. INbllc Services. Wtll the proposal have an effect
upon, or result tn a need for new or altered govo
ernmental servtces tn any of the following areas:
a. Ftre protection?
b. Pollce protection?
c. Sehools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
e. Natntenance of publlc facilities, including
roads?
f. Other governmental services?
15, Ener~Ly, Nil1 the proposal result tn:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
b. Substantial increase tn demand upon ext~ttng
sources or energy, or requtre the developgent
of new sources of energy?
36. Utfitttes. Nil1 the proposal result tn a need for
il, I~man Iiealth, Nt11 the'~oposal result
a.Crestton of any healVn hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
b.Exposure of people to potential health
hazards?
18. Aesthetics, ~tll the proposal result tn the
obstruction of any Scenic vtsta or vtew open to
the publlc, or will the proposal result tn the
creatton of an aesthetically offensive site open
to publlc vtew?
]g. Recreation. Mill the propesal result tn an
tmpact upon the quality or quantity of extstlq ~
recreational opportunities?
20. Cultural Iteso.rces.,
a. ~tll the p~opesal result tn the alteration
of or the destruction of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
APPENDIX
PBge 6
b. Ntll the proposal result tn adverse phystcal
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
h~stor~c butldlng, structure, or object?
c. Does the proposal have the potential to
cause a physical .change which would affect
unique ethnic cultural values?
d. ~tll the proposal restrict existing religious
or sacred uses within the potential ~mpact
area?
21. Handatory Findings of Significance.
a. Does the project hav~ the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wtldl~fe
spectes, cause a fish or w~ldl~fe population
to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten
to eliminate a plant or animal. community, re-
duce the number or restrict the range of a rare
or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
Important examples of the major periods of
California hfstory or preh~stor~?
b. Does the project have the potential to achteve
short-term, to the disadvantage of long-te~t~'
environmental goals? (A short-term Impact on
the environment ts one whlch occurs In a rela-
t~vel~ brief, definitive period of t~me whtle
long-term ~mpacts wll~ endure well tnto the
future.)
c. Does the prolect have impacts whtch are
individually l~mtted, but cumu]attvely con-
s~derable? (A prolect may tmpact on two or
more separate resources where the tmpact on
each resource is relatively small, but where
the effect of the total of those ~mpacts on
the environment ts significant.)
d. Ooes the project have environmental effects
which wtll cause substantial adverse effects
on human betngs, etther dtrectly or indirectly?
DIscussion of Envtr~ -qtal Evaluatlon
(Narrative description of envlronmental Impacts.)
APPEND[X! ~,~
Page 7
IV. OeterttnattOn
(To be completed by the Lead Agency.)
On the basls of thts ln~ttal evaluation:
] find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a s~gntficant effect
on the environment, and a .NEGATIVE DECLARATZON w~11 be prepared.
! find that'although the proposed project could have a significant
effect on the environment, there wtll not be a s~gntficant effect tn
th~s case because the m~ttgat~on measures described on an attached
sheet have been added to t:he project. A NEGATZVE DECLARATZON WILL BE
PREPARED.
! find the proposed project MAY' have a significant effect on the
.environment, and an ENVIRONHENTAL ZMPACT REPORT ts required.
DATE SZGNATURE
For
Mitigation Measures to all "'Yes" and "Maybe" answers:
1.a. At the time of excavation unstable earth conditions will result
which will be mitigated through proper shoring procedure or by
maintaining side slopes of the trench at an angle as recommended by
soils engineer which will allow stable slopes.
1.b. Due to the excavation of the trench, soil will be disturbed and
displaced. Most of this soil will be placed back into the trench
after the placement of utility pipes. During backfilling
operation, the soil will be well compacted~ and the top of the
trench will be leveled to grade with the surrounding ground.
1.c. Topographical change is expected during construction stage only
which will diminish as the project is eut of the construction
stage.
1.,a. Increase in wind erosion may result due to loose excavated dirt
piled up on the side or alongside the project. This will be
mitigated through proper watering of the area under construction
stage and where dirt is being piled up as per standard
specification for Public Work's construction 7-8.1.
1.g. There is a possibility during construction of ground failure which
will be prevented throu!gh proper shoring of the trench walls.
2.a. The heavy equipment on the project site will temporarily disturb
the air quality of the surrounding area, but he is regulated by
Article 7-8.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Work's
Construction. To further minimize this effect, the work will not
be carried out on days when the general air quality is said to be
in 1st stage smog alert.
3.b. Installation of a storm drain line will benefit the general area by
allowing the storm run off water to be picked up by catch basins in
the side streets and reducing the surface flow on streets itself,
thus reducing chances of flooding of streets and surrounding area.
4.a. The City of Fontana recognizes and appreciates the positive effect
that the wind rows of Eucalyptus trees have in creating the beauty
and ambience of the City. The City encourages saving these wind
rows whenever possible. In this project in order to provide for
public health and safety by the construction of sewers and storm
drains, the removal of the existing wind rows of Eucalyptus trees
on Foothill Boulevard between Cherry Avenue and Lime Avenue and on
the proposed Beech Avenue between Foothill and Baseline is
necessary. These wind rows lie within the existing or proposed
street right-of-way.
Page 2
In order to insure that the trees will be planted in the
streetscape at the time Foothill Boulevard is widened to its ful]
width, the City of Fontaria will establish a tree fund. Money will
be placed in the tree fund using the following guidelines:
1. Before the project begins, a certified arborist will verify
the number of trees along Foothill Boulevard and the proposed
Beech Avenue ~hich have to be removed for the project. The
condition and trunk size of each of these trees will be
determined by the arbo~ist.
2. For the trees which have to be removed along Foothill
Boulevard the City will place $75.00 in the Tree Fund for
every tree rated average or above with a diameter of 8" or
less. For every tree rated average or above with a diameter
of 9" or more, $300 will be placed in the Tree Fund.
3. For the trees which have to be removed for the project on
private property along the future Beech Avenue, the City will
negotiate with the private property owners. If the property
owner agrees to maintain the trees, the City wtll plant trees
on the private property of the resident per the schedule
established for thE! trees along Foothill Boulevard.
Money placed in this tree 'Fund could be used to plant trees along
Foothill Boulevard where not already required by development
standards. The tree fund could also be used to preserve another
Eucalyptus Tree wind rows in a location suitable for preservation.
Money could be added to this tree fund from other development
projects to help establish a source of funds to maintain some of
Fontana's historic and/er unique trees.
5.a. The removal of the Eucallyptus trees may change the number of birds
and amall rodents in the area. However, with the planting of new
trees in the streetscape,, the birds and small rodents may return.
6.a. There will be increase in noise level due to construction
equipment, but will it be mitigated by enforcing state laws for
keeping their noise level within permissible limits. Also, the
hours of construction will be limited to 7 a.m. to 6 p.m.
lob. The project may interfere with normal emergency operations. All
utility companies, Police and Fire will be notified at least a week
in advance of the section of the project on which work will be
taking place. In addition, the contractor will be required to
follow the Article 7-10 of the Standard Specification for Public
Works Construction, which addresses public convenience and safety.
Page 3
13b. Existing parking along side of the street may be affected and it
will be mitigated through proper posting of sign indicating
approximately for what time period parking at a particular location
will not be available.
13,c. It will cause substantial impact on traffic flow on Foothill
Boulevard during construction stage and to mitigate, there will be
advance notice placed on the roadway to make the people aware of
the lane closures and expected date of its returning back to normal
state. Also, the contractor will follow Caltran's temporary detour
plans for the smooth flow of traffic.
13d. Excavation of trench in frout of property may cause temporary
inconvenience to the businesses and homeowners along the project
site. In order to minimize the effect, the contractor will be
required, through project specifications and plan notes, to provide
temporary driveway access by any suitable means to the property at
all times.
13f. The closure and movement of construction equipment will increase
traffic hazards to all the road users, and this will be mitigated
through proper posting of signs according to traffic safety
standards and by proper traffic controlling devices for safe detour
of the traffic.
16. The construction of new sewer line will provide sewer service to
the property owners in that areas as well as releasing substantial
pressure off the existing sewer pump at corner of Lime Avenue and
Foothill Boulevard.
MItigation Measures to all "yes" and "Maybe" answers:
Z.a. At the time of excavation unstable earth conditions will result
which will be mitigated through proper shoring procedure or by
maintaining stde slopes of the trench at an angle as recommended by
sotls engtneer whtch wtll allow stable slopes.
1.b. Due to the excavation of the trench, sot1 will be disturbed and
displaced most of this sotl will be placed back into the trench
after the placement of uttltty ptpes.
1,c. Topographtcal change ts expected durtng construction stage only
' which will distinguish as the project ts out of the construction
stage.
1.e. Increase in wtnd erosion may result due to loose excavated
ptled up on the side or along side of the project. Thts wtll be
mitigated through proper watering of the area under construction
stage and where dirt ts being ptled up.
There ts a posstbtltt o~ g~und failure whtch wtll be prevented
1.g. through proper shorln the trench walls,
2.a. The heavy equt~ent on the project s~te w~11 teporar~ly dtsturb
the atr quallty of the surrounding area; to mtntmtze thts affect
be car~ o t n when the general air
the work wt 11 not
quality ts satd to be tn ge
h_ ..... '"
allowtng the t~ benefit the general area by
ptcked up by catch basins ~n
the s~de streets ~nd reducing the surface flow on streets Itself,
thus reductng chants of floodtrig of streets and surrounding area.
4..~The execution of project necesst s r~va] of exist1 d rows
~ts can be mitigated 'planting an ade a~unt of met
trees at thetr u]tt e location tn pub1 rtght-of-wa Z enever
~ that ts made avat ]e to the*City. he eantt~ und could
,be set ~stde f that purpose depe g on the rec ndatton of
landscape a ttect on how man rees wtll b equtred tn the ..
trees should anted tn the are.
6.a. There w111 be tncrease tn noise level due to construction equt~nt
~but wtl] be mitigated by enforcing state laws for
noise level within pwetsstble 3te~ts.
Page 2
lob, The project may interfere with normal emergency operations, All
utility companies, Police and Fire will be notified at least a week
in advance of the section of the project on which work will be
taking pl ace,
13b, Existing pa'~n~ may be affected and it will be mitigated through
..?~.=_~1~ proper post of sign indicating approximately what time period
parking at a particular location will not be available,
13c, It will cause substantial impact on traffic flow on Foothill
Boulevard during construction stage and to m rigareVere will be i
advance notice placed on the roadway to make people aware of the
lane closures and expected date. of its retuntng~ back to normal
13t, a~ mov onstruction equipment will increase
traffic hazards to all the road uses and this will be mitigated
through proper post~rof signs accordtng to traffic safety
standards and by proper affic controlling devices,
16. The construction of new sewer line will provide sewer service to
the property owners in that areas as well as it will release
substantial pressure of the existing sewer pump at corner of ~
and Foothi 11 Boulevard,
T. IBackqrould
2. Naae of Proponent e ln~ O~
2. Address and Phone Nmd~r of Proponent ~_~:~
3. Date of Ch~Htst Su~dU~ ~
6. Description of ProJeclL~ :LN~-~r~ ~F -~F'N~ It., LI~E
~Z II. Envtro~ntal lla~s
~;/" (Explanations of all "~es" and "maybe" ans~ePs
are requtred on attached
sheets. )
Yq~ Haybe No
Ea~. Nfi] the proposa~ resu3t ~n:
a. Unstab3e earth conditions or tn changes tn
geologtc substructures?
b. Dtsruptlons, d~splacements, compact~on or
overcovering of t. he soft?
c. Change In topography or ground surface
' teltel features?
APPENDZX !
Page 2
d. The destruction, covering or modiftcaUon
of any unique geologic or phystcal features?
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of
soils, either on or off the site?
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or
erosion which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
g. Exposure of peoplu or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, 1 ands 1 i des,
mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards?
2. Air. Will the proposal result
a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration
or ambient air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors?
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or
temperature, or any change in climate,
either locally or regionally?
3. Water. ~ Will the proposal result in.'
a. Changes in currents, or the course of di-
rection of water movements, in either marine
or fresh waters?
b. Changes in absorplhion rates, drainage pat-
terns, or the rate and amount of surface
runoff?
· c. Alterations to the course or low of flood
waters?
d. Change in the amount of surface water in
any water body?
e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any
alteration of surface water quality, in-' ?
cluding but not limited to temperature,
dissolve oxygen or turbtdity?
f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow
' of ground waters?
APPENDIX I
Page 3
g. Change tn the quantity of ground waters,
either through direct additions or with-
drawals, or through interception of an
aqutfer by cuts or excavations?
h. Substantial reduction in the amount of
water otherwise available for publlc
~ater supplies?
1. Exposure of peop3e or property to water re-
lated hazards such as flooding or tidal waves?
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or num-
ber of any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any untque, rare ~
or endangered species of plants?
~.t~ c. Introduction of new species of plants into an
, area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
5. Animal'Life. Will the proposal result in=
a. Change in the diversity of species, or num-
bers of any species of animals {birds, land
animals including reptiles, fish and shell-
fish, benthic organisms or insects)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered spectes of antmals?
' c. Introduction of new spectes of animals into
an area, or result tn a barrier to the migra-
tion or movement of animals?
d.Deterioration to existing fish or wtldlife
habitat?
6, Noise. Will the proposal result in: - t
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
t
APPENDZX
Page
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new
light or glare?
8. LaN Use. Will the proposal result in a sub-
stantial alteration of the present or planned
land use of an area?
9, Natural Resources, Will the proposal result
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve=
a. A risk of an explosion or the release of
hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
b. Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or an emergency evacuation
plan?
11, Population, Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate of the human
population of an area'/
12.Housing. Will the proposal affect existing hous-
ing, or create a demand for additional housing?
13.Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal
result in=
a. Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
c.Substantial impact upon existing transpor-
tation systems?
~ Alterations to present patterns of circula-~
tion or movement; of people and/or goods?
e. Alterations to ~raterborne, rail or air traffic?
~.~' Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
btcycltsts or pedestrians?
APPENDZX
Page
14, ~ubllc Services. Will the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered gov-
ernmental services in any of the following areas:
a, Ftre protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
e. Haintenance of publlc facilities, including
roads?
f. Other governmental services?
I5.. Ener~. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon extsting
sources or energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy?
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems, or substantial alterations to the "-
following utilities:
17. Hmn I!ealth. Will the proposal result in=
a.Creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard {excluding mental health)?
b. Exposure of people to potential health
hazards?
18.' Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the
obstruction of any scenic vista or view open ton~
the public, or will the proposal result in the
creation of an aesthetically offensive site ope
to public view?
19. Recreation. Wtll the proposal result In an
impact upon the quality or quantity of existin~J ~
recreational opportunities?
20/~ultural Resources.
a. Will the proposal result In the alteration
of or the destruction of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
APPENDZX
Page
b. N111 the proposal result in adverse physical
or aesthetic effec~.s to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure, or object?
c. Does the proposal have the potential to
cause a physical change which would affect
unique ethnic cultural values?
d. Ifill the proposal restrict existing religious
or sacred uses within the potential impact
area?
ffandatory Findtngs of SIgnificance,
a. Does the pro~lect have the potential to degrade
the quality of the envlronment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wtldltfe
species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten
to eltmlnate a plant or animal community, re-
:~. duce the number or restrict the range of a rare
or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
, important examples of the major periods of
Ca1 tfornia history or preh~story?
4/~ b. Does the project have the potentlal to achieve
short-term, to the disadvantage of long-ter. nf~'
envtronmenta goals? CA short-term impact on
the environment ts one whtch occurs in a rela-
tively brtef, definitive period of time while
long-term impacts w111 endure well tnto the
future. )
c. Does the project have tmpacts which are
t ndt vt dual ~ y 1 t mi ted, but cumul at1 vely con-
sidetable? (A project may impact on two or
more separate resources where the impact on
each resource ts relatively small, but where
the effect of the total of those impacts on
the environment ts significant.)
d. Does the project Ihave environmental effects
whtch will cause substantial adverse effects
on human betngs, ,either d~rectly or Indirectly?
III D¶scuss~on of Envtrormtal Evaluation
(Hat'r~tt ve descrt ptt on of envt tonmental tmpacts, )
APPENDIX I
Page 7
IV, Determination
(To be completed by the Lead Agency.)
On the basts of thts tn~t~al evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULO NOT have a s~gntficant effect
on the enyironmento and a NEGATIVE OECLARATION w111 be prepared.
I find tha~'although the proposed project could have a significant
,effect on the environment, there wtll not be a slgntficant effect ~n~
thts case because the mit~atton measures described on an attached
.sheet have been added to tile project A NEGATZVE DECLARA ZON WILL BE
he proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVZRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ts required.
DATE SIGNATURE
For
Mitigation Measures to all "'Yes'" and "Maybe" answers:
1.a. At the time of excavation unstable earth conditions will result
which will be mitigated through proper shoring procedure or by
maintaining side slopes of the trench at an angle as recommended by
soils engineer which will allow stable slopes.
1.b. Due to the excavation of the trench, soil will be disturbed and
displaced. Most of this soil will be placed back into the trench
after the placement of utility pipes. During backfilling
operation, the soil will be well compacted~ and the top of the
trench will be leveled to grade with the surrounding ground.
Topographical cha.ge is expected d.ri.g
which will diminish as the project is :u~n u
,,,.- stage.
___~p!~cification for Public Work's construction 7-8.1.
1.g. There is a possibility of ground failure which will be prevented
~g~'~ through proper shoring ef the trench walls
.a.eavy equipment on the project site will temporarily disturb
the air quality of the surrounding area, but he is regulated by
Article 7-8.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Work's
Construction. To further minimize this effect, the work will not
be carried out on days when the general air quality is said to be
in a Ill degree smog el'eft stage. Also, the contractor's working
hours will be limited to 7 a.m. to 5 p.m.
3.b. Installation of storm drain line will benefit the general area by
allowing the storm run elf water to be picked up by catch basins in
,the side streets and reducing the surface flow on streets itself,
thus reducing chances of flooding of streets and surrounding area.
4.a. The execution of the project necessitates removal of certain
portions of existing wind rows of Eucalyptus trees on Foothill
Boulevard between Cherry and Beech Avenues as well as between
Foothill and Baseline on Beech Avenue. This can be mitigated by
planting an adequate amount of street trees at their ultimate
location in public right-of-way, whenever that is made available to
the City. In the meantime, a fund could be set aside for that
purpose depending on the recommendation of a landscape architect on
'h~w many trees will be required in the future for that stretch of
Foothill Boulevard and Beech Avenues and what kind of trees should
be planted in the future.
Page 2
6.a. There will be increase in noise level due to construction
equipment, but will it be mitigated by enforcing state laws for
keeping their noise level within permissible limits.
lob. The project may interfere with normal emergency operations. All
utility companies, Police and Fire will be notified at least a week
in advance of the section of the project on which work will be
taking place. In addition, the contractor will be required to
follow the Article 7-10 of the Standard Specification for Public
Works Construction, which addresses public convenience and safety.
13b. Existing parking along side of the street may be affected and it
will be mitigated through proper posting of sign indicating
approximately for what time period parking at a particular location
will not be available.
13c. lt will cause substantial impact on traffic flow on Foothill'~
Boulevard during construction stage and to mitigate, there will b
advance notice placed on the roadway to make the people aware of
the lane closures and expected date of its returning back to normal
state. Also, the contractor will follow Caltran's temporary detour
plans for the smooth flow of traffic.
13d. Excavation of trench ~ of property may cause temporary
inconvenience to the b i and homeowners along the project
site. In order to minimize the effect, the contractor will be
required, through project
spec'' ations and plan notes, to provide
temporary driveway access by ttable means to the property at
all times.
13f. The closure and movement of construction equipment will increase
traffic hazards to all the road users, and this will be mitigated
.through proper posting of signs according to traffic safety
standards and by proper traffic controlling devices for safe detour
of the traffic.
16. The construction of new sewer line wtll provide sewer service to
the property owners in that areas as well as releasing substantial
pressure off the existing sewer pump at corner of Lime Avenue and
Foothill Boulevard.
ENVIRD!eENTAL CHECKLIST FORII
(To Be Comp3eted By Lead Agency)
I. Backqround
1. Name of Proponent
2. Address and Phone Nusbtr of Proponent
3.. Date of Ch~klist Su~itt~
4. Agenc~ R~utMng Ch~kltst
50 N~ of Pro~sal, if applicable ~H~/B~C-H
6, Description of Projec~ ~N~]ALLAT~o~
TU
7. L~ation of ProJ~)~ft~t
I I. Envt rosnta] Impacts
(Explanations of a]] "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on ~ttached
sheets. )
Yes Haybe No
1. Earth. Nt~] the proposal result
a. Unstable earth conditions or
geol og4 c substructures?
b.D~srupttons, d~splacements, compact~on o~
overcored ng of the so~ 1 ?
c.Change ~n topogPapl~y or ground surface
tel ~ef features?
APPENDIX
Page
d. The destruction, covertrig or modification
of any untque geologic or phystcal features?
e. Any increase in wtnd or water eroston of
soils, either on or off the site?
f. Changes in deposition or eroston of beach'
Sands, or changes in stltation, deposition or
erosion which may modify the channel of a
river or' stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
g. Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides,
mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards?
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration
or ambient air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors?
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or
temperature, or any change in climate,
either locally or regionally?
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
a. Changes in currents, or the course of di-
rection of water movements, in either marine
or fresh waters?
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage pat-
terns, or the rate and amount of surface
runoff?
c. Alterations to the course or low of flood
waters?
d. Change in the amount of surface water in
any water body?
e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any
alteration of surface water quality, in- ' ~
cluding but not limited to temperature,
dissolve oxygen or turbidity?
f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow
of ground waters?
APPENDIX
Page 3
g. Change in the quantity of ground waters,
either through direct additions or with-
drawals, or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavations?
h. Substantial reduction in the amount of
water otherwise available for public
~ater supplies?
t. Exposur~ of people or property to water re-
lated hazards such as flooding or tidal waves?
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or num-
ber of any species of plants {including trees,
shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?
c. Introduction of new species of plants into an
area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural cro~
5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or num-
bers of any species of animals {birds, land
animals including 'reptiles, fish and shell-
fish, benthic organisms or insects)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of animals?
c. Introduction of new species of animals into
an area, or result in a barrier to the migra-
tion or movement of animals?
d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: ~ ~
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
APPENDIX
Page 4
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new
light or glare?
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a sub-
stantial alteration of the present or planned
land use of an area?
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve=
a. A risk of an explosion or the release of
hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
b. Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or an emergency evacuation
plan?
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate of the human
population of an area?
12.Noustng. Will the proposal affect existing hous-
ing, or create a demand for additional housing?
13.Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal
result in=
a. Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement?
b. Effects on existin, g parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
c. Substantial impact upon existing transpor-
tation systems?
~d~ Alterations to present patterns of circula-'
tion or movement o,f people and/or goods?'
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
<~.~1 Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
APPENDIX
Page 5
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered gov-
ernmental services in any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
f. Other governmentall services?
1!5. Energ3~. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources or energy., or require the development
of new sources of energy?
1,5. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems, or substantial alterations to the :-..
following utilities:
11. Bin Health. Will the proposal result
a.Creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
b. Exposure of people to potential health
hazards?
1:8. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the
obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result in the
creation of an aesthetically offensive site open
to public vtew?
19, Recreation. Will the proposal result in an
impact upon the quality or quantity of existi~
recreational opportunities?
20. Cultural Resources,
a. Will the proposal result in the alteration
of or the destPuctton of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
APPENDIX I
Page 6
b, Will the proposal result in adverse physical
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure, or object?
c. Does the proposal have the potential to
cause a physical change which would affect
unique ethnic cultural values?
d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious
or sacred uses within the potential impact
21. Handatory Findings of Significance.
a. Does the project [lave the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildltfe
species, cause a 'Fish or wildlife population
to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten
to eliminate a plant or animal community, re-
duce the number olr restrict the range of a rare
or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b. Does the project Ihave the potential to achieve
short-term, to the disadvantage of long-te~{'
environmental goals? {A short-term impact on
the environment is one which occurs in a rela-
tively brief, definitive period of time while
long-term impacts will endure well into the
future.)
c. Does the project have impacts which are
individually limited, but cumulatively con-
siderable? {A project may impact on two or
more separate resources where the impact on
each resource is relatively small, but where
the effect of the total of those impacts on
the environment is significant.)
d. Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
lII Oiscusston of Environmental Evaluation
{Narrative description of environmental impacts.}
APPENDIX
Page 7
Oetermtnation
(To be completed by the Lead Agency.)
One the bas~s of this ~nttta] evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a s~gntficant effect
on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION w111 be prepared.
I find thal~"although the proposed project could have a significant
effect on the environment, thePe w~11 not be a significant effect In
this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached
sheet have been added to the! pro~ect. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE
PREPARED.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONHENTAL IMPACT REPORT ts required.
DATE SIGNATURE
For
Mitigation Measures to all "Yes" and "Maybe" answers:
1.a. At the time of excavation unstable earth conditions will result
which will be mitigated through proper shoring procedure or by
maintaining side slopes of the trench at an angle as recommended by
soils engineer which will allow stable slopes.
1.b.. Due to the excavation of the trench, soil will be disturbed and
displaced. Most of this soil will be placed back into the trench
after the placement of utility pipes. During backfilling
operation, the soil will be well compacted; and the top of the
trench will be leveled tc> grade with the surrounding ground.
1.c. Topographicel change is expected during construction stage only
which will diminish as the project is out of the construction
stage.
1.e. Increase in wind erosion may result due to loose excavated dirt
piled up on the side or alongside the project. This will be
mitigated through proper watering of the area under construction
stage and where dirt is being piled up as per standard
specification for Public Work's construction 7-8.1.
1.g. There is a possibility of ground failure which will be prevented
through proper shoring of the trench walls.
2.a. The heavy equipment on 'the project site will temporarily disturb
the air quality of the surrounding area, but he is regulated by
Article 7-8.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Work's
Construction. To furthe"r minimize this effect, the work will not
be carried out on days when the general air quality is said to be
in a III degree smog alert stage. Also, the contractor's working
hours will be limited to 7 a.m. to 5 p.m.
3.b. Installation of storm drain line will benefit the general area by
allowing the storm run off water to be picked up by catch basins in
the side streets and reducing the surface flow on streets itself,
'thus reducing chances of flooding of streets and surrounding area.
4.a. The execution of the project necessitates removal of certain
portions of existing wind rows of Eucalyptus trees on Foothill
Boulevard between Cherry and Beech Avenues as well as between
Foothill and Baseline on Beech Avenue. This can be mitigated by
planting an adequate a~nount of street trees at their ultimate
location in public right.-of-way, whenever that is made available to
the City. In the meantime, a fund could be set aside for that
purpose depending on the recommendation of a landscape architect on
how many trees will be required in the future for that stretch of
Foothill Boulevard and Beech Avenues and what kind of trees should
be planted in the future.
Page
6.a. There will be increase in noise level due to construction
equipment, but will it be mitigated by enforcing state laws for
keeping their noise level within permissible limits.
10b.. The project may interfere with normal emergency operations. All
utility companies, Police and Fire will be notified at least a week
in advance of the section of the project on which work will be
taking place. In addition, the contractor will be required to
follow the Article 7-10 of the Standard Specification for Public
Works Construction, which addresses public convenience and safety.
13b. Existing parking along side of the street may be affected and it
will be mitigated through proper posting of sign indicating
approximately for what time period parking at a particular location
will not be available.
13c. It will cause substantial impact on traffic flow on Foothill
Boulevard during construction stage and to mitigate, there will be
advance notice placed on the roadway to make the people aware of
the lane closures and expected date of its returning back to normal
state. Also, the contractor will follow Caltran's temporary detour
plans for the smooth flow of traffic.
13d. Excavation of trench in frout of property may cause temporary
inconvenience to the businesses and homeowners along the project
site. In order to minimize the effect, the contractor will be
required, through project: specifications and plan notes, to provide
temporary driveway access by any suitable means to the property at
all times.
13f.. The closure and movement of construction equipment will increase
traffic hazards to all the road users, and this will be mitigated
through proper posting of signs according to traffic safety
standards and by proper traffic controlling devices for safe detour
of the traffic.
16. The construction of new sewer line will provide sewer service to
the property owners in that areas as well as releasing substantial
pressure off the existing sewer pump at corner of Lime Avenue and
Foothill Boulevard.
CITY OF FONTANA
FONTANA~ CALIFORNIA
MEMORANDUM
TO: Bob Weddle, Interm City Engin~ r
FROM: Lisa Donnell, Senior Plan~
SUBJECT: Tree Program for Foothill/Beech Sewer Projects
DATE: October 13, 1989
As further explanation of tree program outlined as a
mitigation measure for the Foothill/Beech Sewer project, the
following background information is provided:
Staff contacted nursery owners in the area to obtain
information regarding tree planting. It was learned that the
longer trees are kept in boxes the greater likelihood that
the root systems would be growing in circles around the
inside of the container. Trees with developed root systems
in a circular pattern have a tendency to fall over in strong
winds; have a more difficult time establishing a new root
system when transplanted; and tend to develop new roots
closer to the surface. For these reasons, it was suggested
that trees no larger than 24" boxed be planted along
streets. The price quoted for a 24" boxed tree delivered and
planted was $300.00. The price of a 15 gallon tree delivered
and planted would be $75.00.
Due to the fact that Eucalyptus trees cannot be transplanted
from existing locations., tend to develop a root system
according to the prevailing wind pattern, and are very fast
growing, it was deemed to be reasonable to replace the
existing mature eucalyptus trees with 24" boxed trees which
could establish viable root systems and not present a safety
problem due to possible toppling Also, it appeared
reasonable to only replace those trees which were deemed to
be of average or above (~ality since the natural life span of
trees below this quality could be very short.
In addition it should be noted that Cal Trans has very
specific guidelines as to the type and size of trees that can
be planted in parkways along state highways. These
guidelines to my knowledge, do not permit trees larger than
those in 24" boxes to be planted. As Foothill Avenue is a
State Highway, the City would be required to follow Cal Trans
standards.
If you need further information please do not hesitate to
contact me.
CITY OF FONTANA
MEMORANDUM
TO: ROBERT WEDDLE
INTERIM CITY ENGINEER
FROM: YOUSUF PATANWAIi~ ~
CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSISTANT III
DATE: OCTOBER 6, 1989
RE: FOOTHILL/BEECH SEWER PROJECT
TREE INVENTORY ]FOR E.I.R. REPORT
In order to prepare tree inventory and evaluation of existing
trees on Foothill Boulevard and Beech Avenue, I contacted
Rogelio Matta, Parks Superintendent, to check whether he can
spare the staff arborist, John Conway, to perform this task
in house.
Rogelio Matta feels that this is a type of task which will
require a lot of time froin his staff member, John Conway, and
he is not in a position to spare him at this time. He
suggested that we should seek help of an outside arborist for
this purpose and he will be glad to provide us with a list of
reference names.
This is an urgent situation and I request your immediate
advice on this matter. Thank you.
e =,
v RECORD OF TELEPHOI~CONVERSATION
CITY OF FONTANA
Job No.
Project
Individual ~"/¢--"'~ ,/)/c 2z~ ~
Organization
Items Discussed
~ c ._, ~// f~L ~ PHONED
MEE~SAGE W LLCALL'
AGAIN ~
CA~E TO
S~ YOU
Comments or Action Required LSiG~D TOPS ~ FORM 4003
9053
Forelan
~onta~a~ ~ 92335
* RECEIVED
HALL & FOREMAN. INC.-
.(d .'. 1~,,
c~ssA i,r~ 1 '3
MB,CK THOM.~S
RETAIN VENDOR COPY OF P.O, IN YOUR FILE.
REMIT INVOICE IMMEDIATELY TO: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE DIVISION, 8353 SIERRA AVE., FONTANA, CALIFORNIA
92335. THE P.O. NO. WILL BE SHOWN ON THE CHECK ISSUED IN PAYMENT H EREOF, THUS ENABLING YOU TO
IDENTIFYTHE PAYMENT WITH THE ITEMS SHOWN ABOVE. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE ONLYAFTER RECEIPTOF
INVOICE
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REPORT
May 2, 1989 Consent Calendar
Heating Date Agenda Placement
TO= Hayor and City Council
FROM= Annivory Calvert, Public Works Director
SUBOIECT: AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE JURUPA INDUSTRIAL PARK STORM DRAINAGE
XMPROVEMENTS. ENG/NEER'S ESTIMATE $1,600,000
CURRE]iT ACT/ON REQUESTE/):
TO AUTHORIZE THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO ADVERTISE FOR BXDS FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE JURUPA INDUSTRIAL PARK STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS FOR:
(A) HEMLOCK AVENUE, JURUPA TO SANTA ANAl (B) BEECH AVENUE, JURUPA TO 1,500 FEET
NORTHERLYI (C) ELM AVENUE, JURUPA TO SANTA ANA;, (D) ELM AVENUE, SANTA ANA TO
SLOVER; (E) JURUPA AVENUE AT POPLAR DRAINAGE INLETS. ENGINEER'S ESTXMATE
$1,600,000
F/SCAL INPACT: ~ Yes I"'T No
The fund source for this project wt11 be from Storm Drain Funds.
Funding requests will be made to Council at a later date for infpectton, con-
struction surveying, contract administration and materials testing services.
Earlier budgeting estimates of $1,200,000 for the base system plus'$400.O00
for the Elm Avenue, Santa Aria to Slover segments. tie out to the current
estimates and the working drawings. These engineering estimates are conser-
vative as we have*not constructed a similar project ~or some time.
BACKGROU~):
The backbone drainage system for the Southridge development is moving forward,
with .construction expected to begin in May, 1989. The Jurupa Industrial Park
Storm Drainage System can now be connected to a downstream drainage system.
With development starting in tha Industrial Park area, storm drain improvements
need to proceed as soon as possible. In order to expedite the process wtth the
final plan updates (coordination with Southridge, et al) currently under way,
staff requests authorization to advertise for bids. It is our expectation to
have the bid openlng on Hay 31, 1989 with a request to award to the qualified
low bidder at the Council meeting of June 6, 1989.
dUSTIFICATION:
Construction of these improvements is necessary for developmen~ to proceed in
the Jurupa Industrial Park.
AI'rAQIIE]fi'S:
1. Pl. ans and specifications wlll be available tn the Engineering Otvtston of
the Publlc Works Department as soon as the latest revisions are completed.
OTHER AFFECTED DEPNIT!!EXTS:
St qnature St anature
ASST. HGR. PARKS & REC.
ATTORNEY PLANNING
BLDG/SAFETY POLICE
CLERK X PUBLIC WORKS
'X'co.. OEV. 'X_'RDA
' 'DEPUTY HGR. ~ RISK HGHT.
T ~:~ ~/~ ~-~ ,- PROJ.
SPEC.
-
RECOHHENDED:
Ctt~ Hana~er
[THE
KEITH
COMPANIES
LEITER OF TRANSMrlTAL
Planning · Civil Enginefling
ArrEhrnon F,~Z.-//*f:'- ,,qt~LI, q05
Fo,qT' ,,h , ,/'d-
WE ARE SENDING YOUrAttached [] Under separate cover via /~ tq/~'-- the following items:
COPIES DATE NO, DESCRIPTION
THESE ARE TRANSMITFED as checked below:
[] For approval [] Appmved as submiRed f'l Resubmit copies for approval
/~_For your use [] Approved as noted [] Submit __ copies for distribution
[] ks requested [] Returned for corrections [] Return ____ corrected prints
[] For review and comment []
[] FOR BIDS DUE 19.__ [] PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
200 Baker Street
Costa Mesa. CA
92626
(714) 540.0800
06/50/89 13:44 ~ 714 987 6499 R~NCHO CUC~MONGA
City of Rancho Cucamonga
TELECOPY
Telephone: (714) 989-1851
Fax: (714) 987-6499
DATE: &,-
TIME:
NO. OF PAGES:
(including this one)
Please call (714) 989-1851, extension 242, if lhere are any
problems in receiving this iransmit~ion.
06/~0/8~ 1~4~ ~ 714 ~87 ~4~ RAN~HO CUC~NONBA 0~
City of Rancho Cucamonga
TELECOPY
Telephone: (714) 989.185i
Fax: (714) 987-6499
TIME:
NO. OF PAGES:
(including ~his one)
Please call (714) 989-1851, extension 242, if there are any
problems in receiving thls |ransmlssion.
REVISED DRAFT
P04072
08-~DD-66-Rancho Cucamonga
PAIT II
CITY OF ~MIC!O CUCAJfOIGA
~OO~Ild~ ~.~V.aen UNI)IPPISS WI~ZN9
1. r~RODUCTION
This proposal calls ~cr widening or replacing Che,ex~sting narrow Foothill
Doulevard Underpass which carries the ~ou~hern Paci~c'~_ BaldWin
Drench ~ne. ~aCe Route 6~ (Foothill B uleva~) negotIi~es ~ reverse ~urve
beneath th~s structure. The ~h o~ t~e ~de~asS, 44 ~eet measured
between'~aees of abutments cons~u~es a bottleneck and a saZe~y hazard on
~n ~rba~ boulevard~~ improved to six lanes w~h a wide median. The
underpates lacks median, sidewalks and shoulders, and can be alleged to be
dangerous for pedantfiRms and bicycl~s~s. Sigh~ distance ~or nor~h~ound
veh!~loq entering at theadjacent Baker ~tr~t
Several ~[~erent basic.~onZi~r~s ~or. Underpas~ ~idening .~~
~enj, rj~in cost ~rom $1.9 ~illi~n.to more than $~.~' m~on,
exclusive ~ costs of ~ rights-o~-way, were developed an~ ere described
........................... ....................
The study reques~ originated ~rom the City ~ Rancho Cucamonga, Funding
expected ~o be de~ved ~rom conventional 3~ate gas ~ax sources, plus a
mandatory l0 percent contribution from Southern
2.
Replacement or w~denin~ o~ Che ex~st~n~ underpaSs has been ~roposed
s~te ot several ser~ou~ vehicular accidents ~ v '~ n
~me~'[ ~ ~'t~i~'E~ 'mu~v~ conc]ece abutmenU. one ~tal~t~
~uJ~!~r~ ol..~be und~ ~s ~ s~n~le ~.an~. ~nl~ trac~, ~hrou~h
steel ~r~er ~ome ~ leer lon2, ~ed by the Consolidated ~teel
Under~s ~butments
The substructure consists o~ two massive reinforced concrete abutments, The
existin~ underpass was reconstructed in 192~ based on a set
January lP29. The present westerly[ abutment was bu~lg new. However, the
east~!y abu~aen~is~.~emo~r~jr~.~ incorpora~i~ortions
FOOTglbL.RPT
previously existing abutment, and portions of the footings were lowered.
~!a~ in the ~!~..~r~F~. ~or an originally ~lanne~ solon4
treck~ c~n~'is ent with the Paci'~ic'~l~l~ic Ratlway's pro~Osai to ~stell
double track for its commuter operation between ~os Angeles ~nd San
Bernardino. The a~oJ~b..e_m~.~k~.~§._were ra~j~_~9~ this ~.ecOnd track.
Both abutments are of ~he gravity-ripe which means tha~ the supporting
concre'%"~'w]Yi"i~"~'bout 4 fee~ thl~[ aC th~'~'~ore than 9 fe&= thick
above~he ~ooting. ~o~~'a[e su~~ spread zoo~n~s~ piles
w~r~ '~o~ u~e exi~tin~ supers~uc~ur~ an~ .Su~c~u_~j~ i~ ~und
ph[sical
Planning aeau~remen~ ~or W~denina or R~lacement
gith ~he demise o~ rail commuter service, the~ a SecOnd track. ne~=
materialized. Therefore, re~emen~,~!ter~ative~ ~ consider .a sinale
~rack ~erx~c~ure only.
The Foothill Soulsyard und~ffpaS~i~i~ien.~ in tha~ i~ offers_only ~Our
~ubstand~rd la~e~ on a thoroughE~re planne~ ~or ~.~.~.~. A re~l~emen~
pro~ec= pr~po~in~a loblet, structure. was nominated ~X~he C~ of Rancho
!~=-83 slatewide ~itt!~s~ o~ ~rade cr6sSings or separations mos~
urgently in need o~ separation or replacement. ~e ~ ~he relatively
high cost ~or complete replacement, some $3.6 million as estimated in
a~d low tra!n(~7 ~t~t
.~ to obtain state mat~hin~ funds.
Xeplacemen~ of this underpass would ,allow widening of the rqadway to six
lanes and ~o ~nclude shoulders and space for b~cycl~sts and'pedestrians,
would eliainate the co~stric~ion c~ traffic approaching ~he concrete
abutments, and would contribute signlficantl~ to highway safety.
The projec~ enjoys strong support from ~he City o~ ~ancho Cucamonga.
has no known
3. SITE CONDITIONS
The section of Southern Facif~c.'s Baldwin Par~ Dranc[~rac~ge at the
under~ass ~it~ is o~ )n eabanksent a~d s~(~.~S the sou~heas~ slope c] Red
~ TB[terr~i~ rises ~e'{~e nort~. The alignmeo~
~Rlev.%r~ ~a~.dB~.the south, again sk~.~n~ the sOUth slo~e_?f Red
~1... There are no s~gnl~cant dr~v~ or in roveiencs on the north s~de
Boulevard is c~osely abutted by residential subdues, such
lil~l~'&nt o~ realignment widehing 3~61il'~ie'Vard favorin~ the south
would create right-of-way acquisition problems. A
FOOTHILL. RPT
4, 8?RUCTUFU~, ax,IelfW~/ff !dID itll:SllOl~ OYIItlTIONav. JkLT~ITIVI3
The development and selection o~ a teasibis replacement or widenin~ plan
I ~or the Foothill Boulevard Underpass must consider the tollowing issues:
o How can Foothill Boulevard vehicular traffic be maintained through
o Now can ~outhern Paci~i~ rail traffic and service to customers be
maintained during c0nstru~ti~? ..............
several dif~eren~ combinations of bridge replacement, alignment, and
railroad operational alternatives were considered, consisting of the
4A. ~ructura~ Alternatives
From the standpoint ot developing an economical superstructure l~out to
~arr~ th~ railroad track, it i~ essen~a~ tAmt any ne~*o~odeied ....
underpas..s ~ave a ~enter pie~ located in the sd.~o~ a d~vtded Foothill
Bo~eva~.roadwaX, ~ ~1nale'~'2~'r~e without a cents[ pier would 'b~
some 2J0 ~feet 'long and would requtre'etth;~"'a"~'h~[~s or
m~.~,~f~R~_~. ~rid~ superstruc~ure.~[the only pr~ct~&l solut~n~
The existin~ topogra hi, the 61, ~j~ewed a~gnmen~ and the ~rooose~
six-la~'[~ised med~,n parkway configur~ion, man~mlnimum'~n lengths
.... ~ ll['~$et ~S~'th~h~ ~ ~pan and for f-80 ra~l~.a~ loa~ing, onI~"
threSj~_e_~~ bridge superstructu3res ar~ considered approp~i'ate
consideration: .......................
o Steel t~ru pla. te girders, similar to the present structure
o Dec~-ty~e,.,.~t-in-Rlace piestressed concrete.. box girder (elij~ated
~rom e~.~sider~tion bec~U~.~_.~d~=Se ~t~.On, roag~ proti!~~
o ?r~uqh-ty~e c~s~fin-place, ;re,~essed concrete ~irder
7hess struct~_~ype~ ~e ~n~ttble with s~!~.~e~.t~p~tr~' ~.r~.~me~
~uuuind
o Construct ~ ~econd steel .~l~._~].~an..on north side only,
similar ~o existing sp~n, to lengthen ~resent bri~e. Exts~'~ span
to remain in place, (compatible wi~h uns~et~tcil widening only,
beach),
o ~e_~0ve present bridge: construct tw~ pew ~{estresssd, reinforced
c~ncr~e ~, Applicable to either ~y_~{~cal or
widJ~'. e,' .......
4B. Foothill Boule~arg..Roadwsy Widening Alternatives
S me. tr'cal widening of Foothill BoUlevard, that is, widening both to
-_ o t~e nor~ and to the south, with center portion of the existinq
pavement converted to s median- It should be noted that thi~
alternative is !..n.,compatih~ ~:!~..~stru~A~_e[_r.~!~pa.d_
operational plan that requires: the present bridge ~.o carry trai~
durin~'conetruction. ~oreovsr', because of the limited ro~dwa~"w~dth
9~'/'~]~[~ ~'8[[~.3. B~, it is clesrly impr.actical tO bu~d e
supporting c~uter pier in the middle o~ the present roadway. To
attempt ~o rou~e traffic around the pier excavetion and through the
existin~f underpass would only create unacceptable traffic congestion.
be cone~r.t~ted parallel an~ on'She ~Or[~ or
4C. ~Jternatives For Handlin~ Southern Pacific ~eil Service Durin~
Construction
Although ~9~ern Pacific wcul~,pre~e~ to m~Ain~l ~ervice across the
preeent'hr~e during c6~&{ructicn, a lurther variety o~ opt~n~
b~ the po~s~b~lit~ tha~ Southern Psc~ic management might e~ree
a nu~er c~'~0~th,. ~hese ~ce alternatives are:
i~ Southern Fac~c Servic~ Al~er'nat~v~ C - Con~inuous ~a~lOnera~
Construct new parallel underpass s~ructure ~n oilset al~gnment~ rail
· ~ service to continue across Foothill. ~oulevard without int~rruption on
~resent br~d~e. '
,~ Southern Paei.~c ~ervice Alternative Z - Ra~% e vice D~scont~.~ued
A ,ajor ~actor ~n evalUatin~ the ~e,~ib~lity 0~"'w~n[n~ &~e
underp~s~ relates to methods o~ h~dl~n~ rail traffic durin~ construction.
A temporar~ timber trestle and shoofl (temporar~ track) would
~ncrea. S~..~,~t c~e~ and s~Ja ~;Ze~lu~ed ~=&~ aenir~tU[a~'] .......
As described ~n ~art ~ in recent years Southern Paci~ic's Baldwin Park
Branch has been uper'a'~e~ a~ two stub end '~y~[s[~; W~t"~
served :tom the C~ty o~ ~'[~'Vara~'~'~s~Tthence v~a san D~ma~ and
Fomona~ the easterl~ segment has been served ~rom ~est Colton Yard through
Rialto and Forttans. Consequently, considera~on c~n be ~ven to rearra~
railroad crew assignments so that ~[[~a'throu~h ~he site' Can be
d~scont~nued'du=~[ constr~'lg~j"' ~i~fi'ar arrangements'to dis'ContinU~ rail
service were made sever21 ~ears a~o dur~n~ construction o~ the victorix
~ark Underpass, ~n the e~sterl~ section O: Rancho Cuc~monga. Under th~s
revised rail operational ~lanc.sw~tch~n; service to Southern Pacific
shippers and industr~es would be is follows:
FOOTHILL. RPT
06/~0z89 15~49 ~ ~14 98? 6499 ~ONCHO CUCAMONGA 05
o West End og Branch -- bocal train to operate easthound from City
Industry Yard, via San Dimes,. Pomona, Nontclair. The last customer
served would be Soyd Lumber {:ompany in Upland. Southern Pacific would
activate its existing trackage rights agreement and operate vie the
Santa re Railway ~or one-halJ~ mile through the City oZ Claremont.
o ,.d ,t nch--Loc. trai. to ope.t.w..tbound
C ton Ysr; a Rielto, Forttans, and Rancho Cucamonga to the American
Call Plastics Products plant near Archibald Avenue in Alta home, and
return.
o It is anticipated that, utili~ing an accelerated construction schedule
and incorporating recommended Scheme 1, the Southern Pacific track
bftw~n ~l~d and ~r~ ~oma would ~e ou~ ~ 'j~vrde Zcr no m~e ~nan
~ouf ~cnths. Z~ s"~a~-in-Elace concret;-ty e ~f construction is
~ei'~j.~. ~he ~rack ~ould ~e ~Ut-o~-serviCe ~oer ~ T~' ~' ~ In
either. case, a~[]~i~l.i~.W... K~u!~'~j~.q.~inue..~...i~t~.~! '
servict.~
~ Southern Pacific engineer~ng s~aZ~ member has indicated in~ormall~ the
Railroad could serve ~s. shippers along the ~aldW~n Fark Stanch b~ trains
operat~g ~rom the C~y o~ Zndus~ry and from West Col~on, respectively, as
described above, but this indiCa~ion should nat be construed as reflac~in~
any ~ormel co~itment o~ ~ou~hern PaciZ~c management.
4D. ~ummary o~ RePlacement Xl~ern~xt~ves
These various combinationS. ~f alternatives were ~d ~o live, identified
and described below:
Scheme 1 - Ee~o~ende~ 'Fig )' ~ -~ "
aoedw8X~idenxna (See ~ t on Sortheas~ -- UnS~etr~cal
Existing underpass to remain ~n plyLee ~c span three eastbound lanes, build
new second span Co the northwest to, extend across thxee-lane roadway ~or
westbound ~ra~t~c, to create a S-lena underpass w~th w~de ned~en. (Because
o~ sdJacent subdivision development, ~t sppears ~npract~csl tc build
~arallel roadway on the eouth.)
The ex~st~na westerly abutmen~ would remain w~Ehout alteration, the
easeerly abutment would be remodele~ as a cen~er p~er. end a new
northeasterly abuemen~ will support a second s~eel ~rder sp~n over
reincared westbound lanes.
Advantages - Th~s alternative presents the s~lest and mos~ ~e solution to the
Erection of ~he add~tional northerly span cculd be
accomplished w~h~n Zour-~o s~x-monChs.
n~sldvant~aes - The e~st~ng und~paps span's 44-~oo~ h~erel cleararies
reduces the standard ~aveled way section cZ the ~hree
*estbo~nd la~; ~y't;c ~'~'["The' ~;nter'iane would be
nsrrowed fcom ~2 to 11 feet, and ~ sidewalk width of onl~ 5
~eet would be ~arr~ed alon~ ~he south 8~de o[ th~ underpi~SV
FOOTHILL.apT
R_~_service to customers would have to be rearrangsd~ as
prev~'~l~'~escribed, with train traffic through the'site
_ s~p.pended.~r four t:o s~x~O~h~ .........
m lv.,( i 5
Install new a.b.u. tments outbound fi'om the existing abutments, remove existing
steel girders and support abu[~'nts, ~nstruct .n'~'~'~'pier, and erect
~o na~ ~teel ~. thru girder
~van~i~es - Relatively short const~uctien schedule, as superstructure
is p~tmarily shop tabricated. S~metric~l widening
limits encroachment into Red ~11.
~A~vant~qes - Requires temporary divided t~aveled w~y sections (~
lanes each direction) during construction ot the
center pier and erection of new steel spans.
K~ Both Schemes_ ~ and2. would require short-term temporary
suspension of rail t~af~tc, i.e,, no shoofly~ refer to a
previous discussion ~ntttlad "Handling Traffic During
ConStruction,"
Facia treatment could be added to the steel girders o~ either
~hames I or jt~to present a more pleasing appearance, as
~--' indicated in Ftaure II-5,
·
Scheme 2A - eW.~teel spen ;$.rders _vi_th Unsy~setrical____X..o~u.d_w..~.v. Wi~e.~in_/g
(NOt shown, ~'t s~lsr to F!~i~re
existing
underpass. The con~tguration oi roadway lanes is similar to tha~ described
~or Scheme 1, and the cross-section the same as ~iaure
a complete new underpass s~ruc~ure would be constructed immediately
adjace~ and on the wes~ si[e oZ the e~s~ina bridc}~ while the la~er
~ I ' abu~ment~ a new center pier would ~ltgn with the present
north abutment; and a new north abutment would be erected about 120 Leer to
the northeast.
After ~he new bridge is completed, the tollowing operations would occur:
siitt Southern Pacitic ~rack ~rcm the .~rese~. bJ~jge ..o~_~9 the
b[idge.
Step .. 2= Remove existing. ~.~eel su~e~struct~3~. ~r~.~._
F~THILh. RPT
ste_.~p_/= Excavate, grade, and pave the new westbound roedYex, parallel and
located on the north o~ the) existing Foothill Boulevard armyelled
way.
Step ~. :~stripe roadway, and rerou~.e tTafIlc. The present pavement will
carry three lanes of eastbound traffic only; the new roadway will
carry ,three lanes of westbound traffic, genetelly as described
~or Scheme 1.
Scbeqe 3 T 9ons}~uct ~lew Prestressed Concrete gndergass on Of.~set
Alianmez~ (See F~gure'~=-n '
An e.~_~=ely new cast-in-place, ~rest=essed ooncrete under~ass could be
constructed i~ediately a~a~ent .to ~he exis.[in~' structure wh~i~he ia~er
Iema~ns ~n service. fem~orary itsel hlsework bobs would span the
existin~ FOothill Boulevard roadway to Support ~he formwork until the
concrete becomes sel~-supportin~.
There are two ge~s~ble s~ructural configurations, both shown ~n
o Pr~s~ressed Concrete ~ox,Deck e~d!r (Not recommended) -- With the
railr0a sub~rade 's~ported on top, ~res~resse~'~x girders of the design
shown in Figure ~1-3 wo~l~ reau~re .either raising the existin~ t~ck by
about dive feq.~, o; ~owerin~ the Daveme~t of Foothill Boulet~
amount. In the latter case, a length o~ [qo~hill Bq~levar~, extending over
some ~,OOQJeet World_have ~ be r)ara4f4 and lowered, as ghown in Figure
II-3.
Because of the extensive regrading, paving and complex traffic handling
problems associated with this conIiguration, as well as the unknown adverse
effects on existing underground util:ities, drainage, and side slopes, the
concrete box deck girder should be dismissed from con~id~ration.
c.qn~oura~zo~.~o~sl ere ~u~ h at this site is commonly referred ~o aw a
trough-ty~ structUr~ --essentially .a%-shaped cross-section which c~rries
the ballast and track section. This cross-section re~uire} a minim,~ denth
of 5 ~eet ~.sup~rtino cB~crete belo~ the railroad ~$es .~9~ ba~a_!~,
.
trough ~s not ~avo=ed by Sou~5'~r~ P~ci~;c engineering o~zcers,
Suc~ under'p&~'~a~e ~een ba~i~' '[[~"'~outbern Pmcffic system. The
~tr~=tG~il W~blemj ~{~"~co~nt?re4 wit~ t~e early ex~phs h~.~ ~en
~oFr~ted. ~e ttoudh-"~yDejs now aeeeotablt.
The principal problems associa~e~ with any t~E o2 conc~e railroad bridge
constr~ction over t~e ex~st'ing hfghw~y incline: ~;{ vertical ' '
~%arance over the roadway to accouodate hlsew~k and ~ormwork, ~ the
"-'-- by temporary timber ~alsework a suppoets.
FOOTHILL.RPT
4a~aNcBo CUCAMONOA
FOOTHILL BLVD. U.P. RA~CHO CUCAMONGA P0407201
pRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE 12/21/88
= wmetrical w!ds, 9 of Foothill lvU. COST
o Existing F~ciliti~
Remove S~cture-Bridge, Single Span Steel
Thm Plate Girder (Inoluding
~ Re~. W~llD) .................... .. ............. $ 190,000
O S~m~Ure-~ridge, ~o Simpl~ Spans, Steel th~
Plate Girder 1,360
Facia Treatment (Optional) ..................... 33,000
o Retaining walls (200' wee~w 100' E~st, North Si~e/
~ts Retired Sou~h) Avercage ~: 8~ ENposed ...... 137,000
u Roadway Items
Detour Grading & P~ving ........................ 26,000
~a=ricades, Tempora~ Signing & S~riping,
Traffic control .................... ~ .......... 30,000
Clea=ing & G~bing .................. . .... 10,000
Roadway Excavation ........................ 40,000
Roudway E~an~ent 20 000
~)r~inage Collection System.., ......... . .... 40,000
Pavement, Curbs, Sidewalks (4~0LF) ......... 92,000
Ioncos, .............................. . ..... Not Retired
~ndscaping and I~rigation (450L[) ......... 11,000
S~gning & Lighting ..................... . ..... 10,000
Appurtenances ................................ 40,000
Mobilization (10%} ........................... 20~, 000
o Railroad Faoilities
~[=ack Removal ................................. 15,000
Pe~anen~ Trae~ork ~ 4~, 000
Railroad Inspection ............................ 30 ~ 000
o U=ilit~ Modifications
StOm Drains & Sanitary Sewer... ............... Not Retired
'.Islephone ~ Power Line Relocations ..... .. ...... By Others
Gas & Water Line Reloca~ions ................... By Others
Sub-Tu~al $ 2,334,000
o AllowanUs for Contingencies & Inflation
Constmc~ion Contingenu~ (20%) ................. 470,
Inflation Allowance (Cu=rent Cos=, July '88).. No~ Included
Total Construction Cost $ 2,804,000
o Allowance for Engineering
Prelimina~ Engineering. ........... . .......... 25,000
Oesign Engineering ........... .. ............... 190,000
Const~c~ion S~akeout and I~spection .......... 140,000
8~-To~al $ 3,159,
O ~ight.-o~-w8~ and Rela~ed COsts
i~n~ and Impr0vemenee ............. . ............ ~0~ Included
Engineering, Appraisal Fees, Etu ............. .. Not I~luded
Total ~roject Cost (exclusive of WW) $ 3,1~9~000
Call ~ 3.16~
FOOTHILL BLVD. U.P. RANCHO ~C~MONGA P0407201
pRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE 12/21/88
SCHENE 1 Uns_~m. et~cal Roadwa l~ldenin~ COST
- Add One Steel Span for ~eet~oundF
Exist Span to Remain for Eastbound
o structure-~ridge, Single Span, Steel thru
Plate Girder .. ...... ..... ...................... $ 780,000
.Facia Treatment (Optional ..
o xetaining wails ( oo' we.t;
Average Ht: 8' exposed.... ...................... 150,000
o Roadway Items
Detour Grading & Paving ......... .. ........ . ..... Not Required
Barricades, Temporary Signing & Striping,
Traffic control ......... . .......... .. .......... 20,O00
Clearing & Grubbing . ......... .. ............... 10,000
Roadway Excavation ............................. 42,000
Roadway Embankment ............ , .... ~ ........... 10,000
Drainage Collection S~,stem ................... 30,000
Pavement, curbs, Side~alks (450LF) ........... 90~000
Fences ................. , .... .. ............... Not Required
Landscaping and ITrigation (4~0LF) ....... .... 10,000
Signing & Lighting ...... o...... ............. . 10,000
Appurtenances (~%) ...................... ....
Mobilization (10%) ............ . ............... 120,000
o Railroad FaCilities
Track Removal ....................... ............15,000
Permanent Trackwork ...................... ........31,000
.aidroad ection ................... ........... 0,000
o Utilit~ Modifi .one
Storm Drain~ & Sanitary Sewer ............ ' ....... Not Required
Telephone & Power Line Relocations. ............. By Others
Gas & Water Line Relocations .................... B~ Others
Sub-Total $ 1,403,000
o Allo~ance for Contingencies & Inflation
Construction Contingency (20%) ' 280,000
Inflation Allowance (Current Cost, J~ly '88) ..Not Included
Total Construction Cost $ 1,683,000
o Allowance for Engineering
Preliminary Engineering...., .... . ......... ., .... 25,000
Design Engineering ..... . ................. . ...... 125,000
Construction Stakeout and Inspection ......... ... 85,00~
Sub-Total $ 1,918~000
o .~ig~'t-of-wav and R~lated Costs
Land and Improvements.. .......... . .............. Not Included
Engineering, Appraisal Fees, Eto ................ Ng~t Included
Total Project Cost (exclusive of R/W) $ 1,918,000
Call $ 1~0D.000
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD UNDERPASS
STEEL 'THROUGH
PLATE GIRDER SECTION
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD UNDERPASS
PRESTRESSEr) CONCRETE SECTIONS
compliance with (check ~e): ~8-SBD-66-15.~8/15.65
you~ ap;lication ~ Se~te~e~ 6, 1~88 Decembe~ 7, 1~88
Ut~ lity ~tice No. o~ $EXE~PT $XXX
~gPeement No. o~ $XXX
~/W C~tract ~. o~ XXX
XXX
' 8~53 Sierra Ave. ~ ~
} Fontaria, Ca. 92335
-- (714) 55~761e , PEtITTEE
an8 sub3ect to the foll~lng, ~ISSZ~ IS ~REBY BRANTED
hive: tnltal led Ind the~elfte~, own i~d Illntlln 8", le", 12",
~tAmlte~ VCP sewer mains, Ilnholel l~d ~ellted ~ppu~tenincel. Also, bote/~ack,
pl~lnd m~Jntitn · 3~" dllmetl~ x 1/2" thick still cll~nI under and Ic~ols the
$0u~hern Pacific RailRoad tracks and remove In exlltlnl 72" diameter RCP.
work Is ~loni the north side ot Foothill Blvd. (Stlte Route 66) f~om Che~ry Ave.
east to Lime Ave. as per R~D-LIN~D REVISED P~ANS date stamped Decembe~ 7, 1988
an~/o~ as directed by the St~te's Reprelentattve.
Art backfl'l I of t~enchel must be to BSS eolpIotlon and/or Is dl~ectmd by the
5hte's Representative. All mlnholel mu~t be cement slurry backfilled a~ directed
b~the State's Representative. Any dimlie to State property Ihall be repaired or
(~placed at no cost to the State as directed by the State's ~epresentatlve.
pRE-JOB CONFERENCE glTH THE STATE'S REPRESENTATIVE IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE
START OF ANY gORK COVERED UNDE~ THIS PE~HIT. AT LEAST TgO WORKING DAYS' NOTICE
SH~LL BE GIVEN TO THE STATE'S REPRESENTATIVE TO SCHEDULE THE CONFERENCE. THE
S~TE'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS PERHIT IS J. ESTRADA, (71t)383-4626.
PAGE 2: ATTACHED TO AND MADE A PART OF THIS PERNIT
~t ~s ~i~ ml~ ~ ~ is c~le~ ~ ~f 31, 1~.
~Et ~ ~all ~ c~ ~til all 0~ ~ ~ ~ ~tal clw~ ~w W ~i~.
~7~
our erm//
been received end ss/ ned
Perre// TrGc /ng Number
CIVIL ENGINEERING · LAND PLANNING · LANO SURVEYING
LEITER OF TRANSMII'rAL
DATE:/, 05/09/89
JOB #: 3904-02
TO: CITY OF FONTANA - Engineering
8353 Sierra Avenue
Fontana, CA 92335
REGARDING: Sewer No. Side Foothill, Oherry to Lime
CONTENTS AND REMARKS:
Transmitted herewith for your information and use is a copy of tree removal
rider to Foothill sewer construction permit from CaI-Trans.
BY: Ray O. Vincenti, P.E.
Construction Admin Manager
cc: John Hogan, Rich Doss, Mike Cordova
/ib
,, 3170 REDHILL AVENUE · COSTAMES/,, CALIFORNIA 92626-3428 · (714) 641-8777
May 10, 1989
8avl~-C. C~unklcton
Hall & Foreman, Inc.
3170 Redhill Avenue
C6sXa Mesa., CA 92626-3428
Subject: Invoices for Foothill Sewer Cherry-Hemlock
This is in response to your letter dated May 3, 1989 regarding invoices
which were returned to you from Heritage with the statement that they
were "City Invoices". According to Albert A. Webb Associates, project
engineer for the City for Village of Heritage, that portion of Foothill
sewer between Cherry and Hemlock is part of Communit~ Facility District
#2; and the invoices in question should be the responsibility of Village
of Heritage rather than the City.
Please note that Exhibit "E" of your contract agreement with e City
· does not call for this portion of sewer li e.'~if thia portion of~s~ewe~
~i~e~ad~b n pa~t of~ your agrccmcnt. the i_~ e and paymcnt ochcdulc a~
pYmae II'and Phase Ill ~L ~A~AuA~ '~".~ ~ ,
Please take up this matter again with Village of Heritage and Webb
Associates. Thank you.
Sincerely, ~0~ O~L'f CO~ ~C~D~ ~0~ ~
Annivory Calvert [~O~& ~h tDclc TD ~e ~ C ~ ~t~t ~L~
Pnblic Works Director
By: Yousuf Patanwala
Civil Engineering Assistant II~'
AC:YP:ca ~ I~0~ d~-~J~V
WEBB
A!llnrt A. Webb Aao~iat~ W.O. __
Riv~ld~, Ca 9:;l~06-2973
Tel hone ~14 ~6-1~0
~714) 78~-1256 .......
To: CITY OF FONTANA ATTiENTION: YOUSUF PATANWALA.
FAX: 350-7691
~From: WALLY FRANZ
Date: May 8, 1989
TIme: 4:30 p.m,
Memo: DESCRIFFION OF WORK CFD .NO, 2 PHASE 1
Pages (Including this cover cheer): 13
Operator: Counie
The works' of improvementp~opoeed to be constructed End installed in ,
Community Facilities District No. 2 in the City of Foetans, California are
generally described as follows:
L STREET, WATER_..AN_~..UND~RGROU_N.D UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS;
Street Improvements, including removals, excavation and grading and the
c~o~struction 0f c~F. bs, ~tt~rs~ sidewalks, bridges, handicapped ramps,
street pavement, street lightning. traffic signing and striping, utilic}'
relocatiene; and also, Domesti~ Water System...I..mproveeent's including mains,
line and side valves, air and vacuum release valves, pressure reducing
valvea, blowoff'assembilea, fire hydrant assemblies, irri~ation water
set.vices and meters, and stu~,-outs for future streets; and also,
Underground Slec~.r..ical and CommuniCations Facilities Improvements,
~ncluding trenching end installation of dents. manholes, vaults, hand
holeS, service pedestals and trench backfilling; and eiso. including
construction and installation of appurtenances and appurtenant work in
connection with the foregoing, all in the following listed streets:
(Improvements are proposed to be constructed Or installed in the full
length of the stree~ unless otherwise ..indicated.)
ARTERIAL STREETS:
Baseline Avenue between the westerly leg 0f the proposed Crescent
and East. Avenue;
The South one-half of Baseline Avenue between proposed Live Oak
Avenue and the Residential/Industrial Boundary; and
Proposed Cherry Avenue! between Baseline Avenue and Foothill
Boulevard.
sy, c so s
LAve Oak Avenue from ~laseline. Avenue to approximately 1800 ~eet'
southerly from Baseline Avenue~
Hemlock Avenue from Foothill Boulevard ~o approximately 1if00 feet
northerly from Foothill Boulevard;
Miller Avenue from proposed Cherry Avenue to approximately 1300
feet easterly from proposed Cherry Avenue|
Proposed Miller Avenue from East Avenue to proposed Heritage
Parkway|
Proposed Heritage Parkway, from wes~erly[leg of ~rand Avenue ~o the
northerly boundary of CPC|
The proposed Sou~h Crescent, from BaSelins Road to easterly leg of
Creed Avenue:
PrOposed 0rand. Avenue, from Crescent to SCree~ "V" and the westerly
lee of ~rand Avenue from "V" to Heritage Parkway;
Unnamed proposed streets. shown on the improvement plate and
designated by the following letters:
MAY 08 ~8~ 1B:39 P.1
Unnamed proposed set'eats, shown on the improvement plats
and desilmated by ~he following
') "A";
"O", fz'om "N' to the eamte~:~y ~eretnus of
'He; "3' eke fz, om "Ls to spp~oxtle~ely midway
'0"; ,p,| .Q,; ,R.; 'S" "~"' 'DD"; and,
excepting domeetlc water constt-ucted in Phase i for ~ut Avenue, BaseltneRoad
and Heri~a&t Parkway.
~I. O~'~ZTB DOMSSTIO WATER 5Y~ IMPROVEN~: NON~
III. SIONAL~ZATION, including the ins~lla~on of s~ina~ze~ion st ~o (2)
me~or street intersections, g~ eight (S) mine: s~le~ intersee~ions and ~
(2) :eilt-oad crossings, incZudin~ mas~s, e~ms, signal heeds, cables, condui~s,
~t~tngs, devicest sleety lighting, sppu~tenmnces and eppu~tenant work in
con~ec~on bhe~ewith ~ bhe following Intersections|
Halo: $nte:eecttons:
FQothlll Boulevard and ~as~ Avenue~ and
Basalgem Avenue ~ith 1-15 Neathbound On-Orr~amps.
~tnor Intersections:
BaseZinc Avenue end the easte:~y le6 of the
! East Avenue and p:oposed unnamed Street 'DD';
Bast Aven~e and proposed NiZ~e: Avenue;
~ooth~ll Boulevard and proposed unnamed St~ee~
Proposed Cherr~ Avenue and proposed unnamed 8treet "C';
Proposed Cherry Avenue and proposed ~i~er Ave~e;
Proposed C~e:~y Avenue end proposed unnamed S~ee~
and
Proposed C~erry Avenue emd proposed unnamed ~t:ee~
Redlroed CrossingS:
Baselthe Avenue and
(Proposed unnamed streets a~e es mhown by lette~
designations on ~he improvement pZa~s.)
ZV. SANZTARY SEWER ZHPROVENgh"r$, including mains, manholes, wyes, and
sbub-ou~s Per ~u~u~e me=eels, including appurtenances end appu=~mnan~ work in
connec~ion ~her~wi~h rot Orrsi~e Sewers and sewers in certain A~terisZ and
Backbone St~ea~s and in Eesemen~s ss rollowe:
(Improvements ~o be installed generally along the enbi:e length o~
unless oChe:wise indicated.)
ARTSRZAL STREETS: NONE :
I MAY 08 ~89 16:33 P.1
P~s~ ~ri~ Parkw~, ?r~ w~ter~ Or~d
~d ~s~rly ~e2 of G:~ ben~ ~ St~t 'V" to
Unn~ p~osod st~ets, u s~n ~ ~ imV~nt
plats ~d des~aC~ b~ the foll~in2 letters:
"~"; "X'; "Z"; ,,~,,; ,,~,,; ~ ,,~.
~ements, sho~ on ~e ~mp~v8ent plate ~ desolated
by the letters "~" ~n combination w~ a d~f~t u follows:
V. 0~I~ S~IT~Y S~ I~OV~, ~ncludtn2 ~nsC~laCion ~d
cons trucC~on o ~ 28i~. m~holes, co~nis ,. pa~ent removal ~d replacement,
, app~r~en~ces ~d appurtenen~ work in connection ~he:~ith in ~he following
streets:
Eest Avenue f~m the Easement des~atd as SE-9 on ~he
lmprovemen~ plats to Foothill ~ulevsrd;
Chi~U .Argue', f~om Bueline Avenue to Poo~hill
Boulevard; ~d
) From Foothill Boulevard ~d East Avenue southerly on
Hickory Avenue to Arrow Righw~, ~hence westerly ~o
Etiw~da Avenue, thence southerly ~o Marlay ~venue.
Vt. STORM DRAIN IMPROV~E~, including reinforced concreUe pipes and box
culverts, m~holes, Junction structures, tr~siUion s~ruc~res, catch basins,
connector pipes, appur~ces ~d ~pur~en~ ~rk in connection therewith
within ~he Arterial ~d Backbone Streets ~d in ~emente as fcll~s:
(Unnamed proceed s~rests a~ desi~a~ed on ~he improv~ent plats by le~ers
~d s~orm drain easements by ~e let~ers "SD" Foll~ed by a digit. )
Baseline Avenue, from existin2 S~ Sevaine Creek ~o ~p~ximately
1100 feet westerly from ~he SBCED rlgh~ of way for E~iwanda Creek
Fled Control Ch~nel;
PrOceed Cherry Avenue, From proposed s~ree~ "lI" to p~posed
screen "E" { ~d
Foothill Boulevard, from Hemlock Avenue to ~he SBCFCD rl~ or way
For E~iw~da Creek FZood Control Ch~el.
,MAY 08 ~8~ 1~:~ P.2
Proposed Live Oak Avenue. from its eoutharl~ ~erminus to
approximately 1,000 feet sol,t~herly l~r~e Baseless Avenue;
Miller Avenue, from its ealte~l~ terminus to px~sed Cherr~
AvenUe t
"~" $treet f~o~ pro~Nmesd Het, ita~ Parkway, to Redwood Avenue;
Proposed He~ita~e Parkway, ~rom its intersection ,rASh proposed
streets "0" and "K" to its intersection wi~h proposed "g"z from its
intersection wi~h px~osed etmt "g" to Easement "SD-6", from
northerly boundary oF OPC southerly to the $BCFCD right of.we~v rot
Etiwenda Creek Flood Con~ol Ohannel, and, at its in~ereec~ions
wi~h proposed streets "CC" and
Proposed South Crescen~ at its intersection with soughbound Grand
Avenue Z end
Proposed Southbound .Grand Avenue, rrnm propose~ SoU~h Crescent to
proposed street "V" and from proposed street "W" to Heritage
Parkway.
UNNAMED PROPOSED STRESTS::
"X" at its intersect.~on with "Z"; "Z";
"AA" between "V" andT "Z", and, [rom approximately
800 feet northerly from "Y" to "CC"; "CO"t
"GG"; and "HH".
"SD-2"; "SD-6"; "SD-7"; "SD-8"; and "SD-9".
VII. ~ANDSCAPINO, including planrise of trees. shrubs, ground cover and other
plants, soil amendment, ~urnishing and spreading topsoil; fertilizer and mulch,
installation OF irrigation systems, including pipes, valves and sprinkler
heads0 plane maintenance and ~u~niahinZ and installation o~ appurtenances and
performance of appu~tenant ~ork in connection therewith, all in accordance with
~e Open Space/Recreation Concept of the Wast End Specific Plan aa follows:
PARKWAY AND MEDIAN LAND$OAPXNG:
ARTERIALS:
8asSline Avenue, southerly pa~k~a.y between proposed Live Oak Avenue
and the Industrial/Residential Boundary, and, in both parkways and "
the full median between ~he wes~ leg o~ the proposed Crescent to
Eas~ Avenue|
and Proposed Cherr~ Avenue, both parkwayl and the full median
between Baseline Avenue and Foothill Boulevard.
COL~-ECTOR Sq~BETS: Within streets in Phase I.
LANDSCAPTNG OF PAR~, TRAILS, GATEWAYS,
ENTRYWAYS. UTxLI~"~ AND RAILROAD F~ASEMEN~|
Parks, Schools, SchOol/Park and Community Facilities/
Recreational/Open Space Areas:
(Desi~nated on the improvement plats by name and a
ls~ter/dlgit desl&q~ation. )
Park, designated Area
) Foothill Gateway Park, designated as Areea "OS-~"
· and "0S-5";
School/Park Areas, desiina~'ed as "SP-2"| and
School/Oommunlt~ FaCilities/Recreational/Open Space
Areas. designated a~ Area
MAY 08 '89 16:3~ P,1
XZI, OPIff!AT'rON AND MA1'l,r,t'jdldANOmz
Included in the work for ~he O~aeunity Facilities
District will be operation and maintenance of ~acilities
constructed by o~ lervtn~ the Diet~ict, as l'oll~l:
8tz~et ~.lehtin~
Dete~tion BsSins
Firs Services
Foltce Services
Pa~ks
Landscapin~
A maintenance district is proposed to be formed pursuant to the provisions of
the "Landscepin2 and LiShtin2 Act of 1972", bein2 Part 2 or Division I~ o~ the
Streets and Hi2hwa~s Code or ths State of Caliro~nie, ~or ~undin2 the operation
and ma~ntensnce costs ~o~ Street ~.~2htin2, Parks and Ls~dscapinZ, with ths
costs .~or maintenance and ope~ation o~ the remainder o~ the above listed l~ems
~o be ~unded by ~he Community Facilities District No. 2 special tax and by ~ax
increment funds pled2ed by the Fon~ana Redevelopmsnt ASenc~.
Incidental Expenses:
Zncidon~al expenses lncludo the costs ~o~ design and construction
en~nesr.~n~; landscape architectural desl2n| compensation o~ ~he
City En2ineer ~or plan checkin2, inspection, 'ndministcet~vo costs
and monitorin2 o~ the pt-oJect; permits; so~ls and materials
tssti~2; cons~ruction m~a~ment ~d supe~lsio~; ~d, contract
~minist~s~lon.
-I
.MAY 08 ~89 i~:S6 p.~
DBSCRIPTION OF WORK
C0}6~U~IT~ FACIL~TIIS DISTRICT N0.2
CITY OF FO~rrANA
The ~orks of isp~ovesent p~oposed to be constructed and installed
Community Facilities District No.. 2 in the City or Font~a. Califo~ia are
;hardly ~scrl~d u follows:
~reet Imp~vmm~ts, lnclUdin; ~e~vals. excavation ~d 2~in2 ~d
conerection o~ curbs, ~tte~s, sideelks, b~id2es, h~dicapp~ ~eps,
street pavement. st:eat l~2h~in~, trm~fi~ st~in2 ~d Sttipin2, utill~
telorations; ~d also. Domestic Wate~ S~stem Improvements inUludin2
m~ns. line ~d side valves, ai~ ~d vacuum ~le~e vatyes. pressure
'.I"1AY 88 '89 16;40
BACKBON~
Proposed South Cmcent, from east le2
Baseline Road;
PToposad Her~taSe Parkway, northerly of
easterly e~px~bsatel¥ 1000' f:~m "E-E" and ~n the
proximity of "Hw Street;
Proposed seat leg of Grand Avenue, rrcm 're Strewst to
Her~tNle ParkMaM;
Unnamed Proposed Streets, am eho~n on the improvement
plats and dmsl2natsd by the relicwinE latterst
"L"; "Mw ! "~'* J **~";
Easements shown on the imp~ovement plats and designated
by the letters *'SE'* ~n combination with a d~ait am
follows:
'*SE*2"; "St-3'; ~'SS-tt'; "SE-F' |
V. OFF~ITB SANITARY SEWF/% IMPROVEMENTS, includin~ installation and
construction o~ mains, manholes, casehas, pavement removal and replacement,
appurtenances and appurtenant work in connection therewith in the followin2
streets:
VI. STORM DRAIN IMPROVD~ENTS, includin~ reinforced concrete pipes and box
culverts, manholes. ~unction structures, transition structures, catch basins,'
connecto~ pipes. appurtenances ena eppurtenant work in connection the~ewith
within the Arterial and Bsckbone Street ~nd in Easements as follows:
(Unnamed propose~ streets are des~Snated on the improvement plats b~ letters
~nd storm drain easements by the letters "SD" followed by a digit. )
AR~_J~IAL STREETS:
BACKBONE
Proposed Hsritsge Perked, f~x~ app~ximately ~0 feet
essterl~ of proposed street "IS" to Ballsent
Item proposed street 'DD" southerly to the CPC northerly
Boundat~y.
U~NAMF~ PROPOSED STREETS:
"J"; "N" ~ "0" between "N" and Easement "SD-~"
"P" between "S" and Southbound Grand Avenuel
"S" from approximately ~00 ~eet nor~herl~ from
"M" to "N", from "P" to approxisatel¥ 800 fee~
northerly ~rom "P", and at its intersection with
"T"; "T"; "U"; "V" .
,MAYI[ItEI '89 i~:40 P.~
VII, LANDSCAPINQ, includin~ plantin~ of trees, shrubs, g~ound cover and other
plants, soil amendment, rurnishir4$ and spreadin2 topsoil, fertilizer and mulch,
installation of irrlSation systems, lncludin~ pipes, valves 'and sprinkler
heads, .plant saintshence and ~urniehin2 and installation o~ appurtenances and
perform. enos of appurtenant work in connection thez~with, all in accordance with
the Open Space/Recreation Concept oF the Wast End Specific Plan as
'PARKWAY AND HgDI'..~h~r LANDSCAPZNO:
Baseline Avenue, southerly Pa~kws.V., From east leg of
" Crescent to the Industrial/Residential Boundary, and in
both, parkways and the full median between the east leg
and the west lee of the proposed Crescent;
Foothill Boulevard, the North P~kway between Hemlock
~venue and l~ast Avenue;
East Avenue, the East Parkway between Baseline Avenue
and Foothill Boulevard.
COLLECTOR STREB~: Within streets in Phase
Parkways end medians of all streets shown on the improvement plat,
planned and deeii~nated by letters. within the proposed OFD
boundaries, and also, those portions of proposed ~emlock Avenue, of
proposed Live Oak Avenue and or proposed Street "C" which are shown
on the p~at but lie outside the proposed CFD boundaries.
LANDSCAPIHQ OF PARKS, TRAILS, GATEWAYS,
EN'~'nTWAYS, UTILITY AND RAILROAD
Parks, Schools, School/Park and Communit~
Fac~lities/Recreational/Open Space Areas'-
(Desi~nated on the improvement plats by name and a
,letter/dijit desiination. )
East Village Bark, desiWnated Area P-l;
School/Pa~k Areas, designated as "SP~I''
School/Communit~ Fac!lities/Recreat~onal/Open Space
Areas, designated as AI~as "OS-I", "OS-a', "08-3" , and
"S-1".
FE. DESTRIAN TRAIL LANDSCAPING:
All trails as shown on the improvement plats, not
included in Phase I.
MRY 00 '0SI 16:40 P.4
~ I~~
OATBWAY AND EI~YWAY LANDSOAPiNg:
(Foothill Oatews~ Pa~k);
CreScent Kntries, rrcln east Zeg of O~ Aven~ to
B~eltne
East Villas ~t~iee; and
Middle & eou~herlM Gmmd Avenue Entries,
VIII~ BRXDG~/~LTIPLE BOX OULV~, including s~Puc~ure excavation ~d
backSill, ~orming, ~drnishAng
concrete ~or b~dges or multiple box culverts ~d parapets, h~d rails,
appur~en~ces ~d appur~en~ ~or~ in co~ion ~h~re~i~h a~ the E~i~anda
Creek FloOd Control 0h~nel Crossing o~ ~he SPRR, ~d a~ ~he~ollo~ing
in~ars~c~ions o~ s~ree~s wi~h ~he E~i~da Creek Fldod Control Ch~nel:
Heri~ag6 Parkway a~ two locations in i~s ~e~erly loop, ~he nor~heriy sash-west
leg ~d the sou~e~lF portion o~ ~he nor~h-sou~hleg.
Ix, FLOOD CONTROL FACILITI~, includin~ ch~nel grading, bhe construction of
concme~e ~ned ch~nels, from Victoria Avenue to Foothill Boulevard, excepting
~he portion batten Baseline Avenue ~d ~he SPRR included in Phase I, ~he
rechenneling of S~ Saysine flow ~o the ECiw~da Creek Ch~el ali~ment, and
~he construction o~ ~empora~y ch~nel improvemen=e ~d [l. ood control basin
excavation a~ LoWer S~ Saysine B,~in
improvements within the West End Specific Plan Area, ~n~ether wi~h
appurtenances end eppUr~en~% workin connection ~erewi~h, ell in accordance
wi~hAl~e=naCe "B" of %he Supplemental Repor~ on Flood Control Facili~F
Alternatives foP~ ~he Wes~ End Specific Plan as prepared by Bill Mann end
Associates, da~e~ November, 198A~. (Inclusion of ~he por~iono[ the flood
control channel between Baseline Avenue ~d ~he
~eview ~md may be included in Phase II,)
x. OFFSITE DRAINAGe, Double Reinforced Concrete Box, including
appurtenances ~d appurten~t work, from 1000' eas~erlM of E~iw~da Creek
the eas~ Crescent.
XI, SEBVZCE FACIL~TI~:
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:
Inchmded in ~he work ~oP the CommunitM Facilibies Dis~ric~ will be
operation and maintenance
the District, as follows:
Street Ligh~in~
Detention
Fire 8errices
Police Services
Parks
A m&intennnce district iS p~s~ Co ~ foxed pu~su~ to
p~vie~ons of ~he "L~dscap~n2 ~d Light~ Ac~ o~ 197~", be~n~
Pa~ a o~ Division 15 of ~he S~e~s ~d Hi~w~s Code of ~he
of California, fo~ ~und~n~ ~be operation ~d m~n~en~ce costs ~o~
S~ee~ LlZhtinZ, Pa~ks ~d L~dscapi~, wl~h ~e costs fo~
main~en~ce ~d opeTat:lon of ~e ~em~ndsr or the ~ove lis~ed '
items to ~ ~d~ by ~he Ccmm~i~y Facilities Dis~ct No.
special t~ ~d by ~u increment ~unds pledged by the Font~a
Re~velopmen~ A~cy.
hcident~ ~enses~
Incident~ e~ensee in4~lude ~e cost8 ~or desi~ ~d const~uctlon
en2ineeTin2~ l~de~a~ a~chi~ectural desi~ compensation o~ the
City ~6inee~ [o~ pl~ checkinE, inspec~ion, edministra~ive
~d monito~in~ o~ the proJect~ peTmt~sJ soils ~d material
constructi~ m~a~emen~ ~d supe~ision~ ~d contrec~
admi~ist~at~on,
/
EXHIBIT "E"
(i=&ait Ne.]
(Fer Of~t rJ.)
EXHIBIT "E" ~ I ~,ien,:
FEE AND PAYMENT SCHEDULE t:sa~:~
The Client agrees to compensate the Consultant, as compensation
for the services indicated in Exhibits "B", "C" and "D" (Scope of
Work), on an hourly basis in accordance with the Standard Rate
Schedule indicated in Exhibit "2F", with a maximum fee not to exceed
the following:
Phase I Foothill Blvd.- Hemlock to Beech
Item 1 Design & Easement Documents ....... $7,160.00
Item 2 Contract Monitoring ........ . ....... $1,155.00
Item 3 Inspection ........................ $S,815.00
Phase II Beech - Foothill Blvd. to Base Line
Item 1 Design & Easement Documents ....... $14,534.00
Item 2 Contract Monitoring ............... $S,380.00
Item $ Inspection ......................... $11,190.00
Phase Ill Foothill Blvd.- Beech to Pump Station
Item I Design, Survey & Easement Documents $13,522.00
Item 2 Contract Monitoring. .............. $1,240.00
Item 3 Inspection ......................... $5,130.00
-8-
CONSULTANT ENGINEERING SERVICES
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.
CITY OF FONTANA, CALIFORNIA
This AgFeement made and entePed into this 2nd day of June 1987
by and between the City of Fontana, a municipal corpoPation, hereinafteP
referred to as "City", and Albert A. Webb Associates, 3788 McCray Street,
Riverside, California 92506, her.einafter referred to as "Engineer", witnesseth
that:
WHEREAS, City has formed Community Facilities District No. 2 (West End
Specific Plan Area) pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of
1982; and WHEREAS, City has need for Civil Engineering Consultant services For
performance of certain tasks related to said District and the lands therein,
including:
1. Special tax distric'b procedural, budgeting and fund disbursement
related tasks.
2. Checking of maps for subdivision of the lands within said
District.
3. Checking of plans for improvements to be installed as part of the
work in said District and required as conditions to approval of
said subdivisions, including review of studies and reports
relating to such improvements.
l~. MonitoPing of construction of impPovements to be constPucted and
installed as paPt of the woPk in said DistPict.
D. Inspection of the DistPict public impPovements duping
constPuction and installation thePeof.
WHEREAS, EngineeP has specialized knowledge, tPaining and expePience
in pePfePmance of such tasks; and,
WHEREAS, it is the desiPe of the paPties hePeto to set foPth the tePms
and conditions under which EngineeP shall pPovide City with the services as set
forth hePein;
NOW THEREFORE, be it mutually agPeed as follows:
FIRST: EngineeP, when authoPized, shall pePform the named work in
conjunction with the afoPementioned project in accordance with the pPoposalS
thePefoP, dated December 11, 1985 and JanuaPy 21, 1986, as amended, and the
following:
1. Assist City Staff and Consultants in pePfoPmance of special tax
distPict Pelated tasks, including, but not limited to, pPoceduPal
matters such as Peallocation of special taxes, pPeparation of
district and phasing budgets, allocation of costs, Peview of
incidental expense invoices and calculations fop bond fund set
aside amounts.
2. PePfoPm subdivision map checking services, including checking fop
conformance with conditions fop appPoval of such maps, afteP
receiving notice that DevelopeP has paid to oF deposited with the
City all fees PequiPed in connection with such maps.
2
THIRD. City shall compensate Engineer for services performed as
follows=
1. Special Tax District Services: Services set forth in Section
First, 1., shall be performed for the hourly rates set forth in
the Fee Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit "Art, plus
reimbursement for incidental expenses, such as costs for
printing, copying and mileage incurred in connection with such
services at cost to Engineer. In no event shall the hourly rates
exceed that for Project Engineer.
2. Subdivision Map Checking: Engineer shall be compensated for
subdivision map checking services as follows:
Base Fee per Map : $325
1 to 50 Lots : $ 35 per Lot
51 to 100 Lots : $ 30 per Lot
10i Lots and Up : $ 25 per Lot
The base fee assumes no major discrepancies or disputes
concerning boundary closure. It is also assumed that the plan
checker will be furnished copies of title reports for the land
being subdivided, all survey notes and data concerning the
location of permanent monuments found and will also be provided a
computerized lot closure run for the subdivision.
3. Improvement Plan Checking: Engineer shall be compensated for
improvement plan checking, based on the Engineer's Estimate of
Improvement Costs for the improvements required for each
subdivision or District related project as follows:
Estimated Construction Cost Plan Checking Fee
0 - $ 50,000 $ 500 + 3.5% of construction costs
$ 50,001 - $ 150,000 $ 2,250 + 3.25% of construction
costs over $50,000
$ 150,001 - $ 250,000 $ 5,500 + 3.0% of construction costs
over $150,000
$ 250,001 - $ 500,000 $ 8,500 + 2.5% of construction costs
over 8250,000
$ 500,001 - $1,000,000 $ 14,750 + 1.5% of construction costs
over $500,000
$ 1,000,000 - and up $ 22,250 + 1.0% of construction costs
over $1,000,000
The above fees are predicated on the following:
1. That the checker will receive for checking all improvement plans,
e.g. street, sewer and storm drain, pertinent to a particular
reach of improvements. This will balance out the costs since
some types of improvements, such as sewer, should require less
than the average checking time, while street improvement plans,
for example, will require more. This will also speed up checking
and resolution of iraprovement conflicts.
2. That the checker will be furnished all map street centerline
data. The checker will also be furnished copies of the water
plans and any other underground facilities plans not being
checked in order to resolve any conflicts.
5
3. That the number of ehecks per set of plans covered bF the above
schedule shall be limited to .three unless revisions required
after the third check are minimal.
EnEineer shall be compensated for tasks such as reviewinE and checking
studies and reports related to the project, grading plans and right of way
documents at the Pates set forth en said Fee Schedule attached as Exhibit "A".
In no event shall the hourly rates exceed that for Project Engineer.
In addition, Engineer shall be reimbursed for incidental expenses
incurred in performance of the foI~egoing services at cost to Engineer.
Project Monitor: Duties for project monitor will be performed fop an
hourly Pate set forth on attached Exhibit "A" fop Project Engineer,
plus reimbursement for incidental expenses such as printing and
copring, telephone toll charges, etc. No mileage will be charged fop
the ProJect Monitor. Compensation for supporting personnel assistin~
the Project Monitor in performance of his duties shall be at the rates
shown on the Fee Schedule! attached hereto as Exhibit "A", but in no
event shall said rates exceed the hourl~ rate set for Project Manager.
Inspectors: The fee for inspectors shall be $35.00 per hour, plus
mieage. Mileage charges for inspectors shall be $0.50 per mile.
The Pate for siEnalization and lightin~ inspection shall be $55.00 per
hour plus reimbursement for mileage at a rate of $0.50 per mile.
The foreging fees and Pates shall be subject to review each AuEust 1st
during the life of this agreement.
6
FOURTH: Engineer shall perform tasks in connection with the said
District in addition to those set forth in Section "FIRST" if authorized to do
so, in writing, by City. Engineer shall be compensated for such additional
authorized work at the hourly rates set forth in said Exhibit "A" plus
reimbursement for incidental expenses and outside service as set forth in
Section "THIRD".
FIFTH: Effective Date of Contract
The effective date of this agreement is January 21, 1986, and shall
end on completion, satisfactory to City, of all authorized work.
SIXTH: Termination
The right is reserved by City to terminate tZhis Agreement at any time
upon written notice to Engineer inn the event the project or any portion thereof
is to be abandoned or indefinitely postponed, or in the case Engineer's
services, in the judgment of the City, are unsatisfactory or because of
Engineer's failure to prosecute the work with diligence or within the time
limits specified, or because of his inability to perform. In any such case,
Engineer shall be paid the value of the services rendered up to the time of
termination. If the services of Engineer are terminated for fault on his part,
City ms~ procure the completion of the services or work in such manner as it
deems best and shall charge to Engineer any excess cost over that provided for
in this Agreement or any damages City may sustain by reason of default.
Notices shall be deemed to have been given for the purpose of this
Agreement on the day that the s~me are deposited in the course of transmission
of said system.
7
SEVENTH: Designated Repr'esentative
Ssjn I. Gershon, Ronald L. Buckley of Wallace Fpanz will represent the
Engineer and be its contact and agent in all consultations with City duping the
fulfillment of the terms of this Agreement.
EIGHTH: Access to Work Prpduct
City.shall at all times havB access to the work product of Engineer
hereunder whenever it is in preparation and progress.
NINTH: Compliance with Law
Engineer understands, and does hereby agree that, in the performance
of services pursuant to this Agreement, he shall comply with all applicable
laws and governmental regulations pertaining to such services when performed
for City.
TENTH: Amendment
This Agreement shall not be modified except by an agreement in writin~
signed by both parties.
ELEVENTH: Assignment
This Agreement shall not be assigned, in whole or in part, by
Engineer.
TWELFTH: Notices
Whenever notices are required to be given pursuant to the provisions
of this Agreement, the same shall be given by depositing the same in the course
of tpansmission of the United States Postal Services, postage prepaid,
addressed as follows:
a) City: Robert Schoenborn
Director of Public Works
City of Fontana
8353 Sierra Avenue
Fontana, CA 92335
b) Engineer: Sam I. Gershon
Vice President
Albert A. Webb Associates
3788 McCray Street
Riverside, CA 92506
8
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hePeto have caused this Agreement to
be executed on the day and year first above written.
CITY OF FONTANA
Mayor
ATTEST:
Depu~ City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM ALBERT A. W B ASSOCIATES
Y ~,- I ~ershon
Vice President
MISC2/85-268
9
" ATTACHMENT "A"
PROJECT MONITOR
(City of Fontaria)
The tasks of Project Monitor shall include, but not be limited to, the
following:
1 Review plans and specifications for the improvements proposed to be
constructed.
2 Monitor bidding and award of contract procedures.
5. Reyiew bid proposals 8rid make recommendations to the City as to the
award(s) of Contract.
4. Review contracts and utility and railroad agreements.
5. Attend pre-construction conferences.
6. Review construction contract change orders and m.~ke reco~mmendations
thereon.
7. Perform periodic on-site observations of the work in progress as a
basis for determining that the improvements are being constructed in
accordance with the Contract documents.
8. Review and verify Contraetor's monthly progress estimates and payments
made thereon.
9. Furnish periodic reports of progress of the project as required.
10. Provide supervision of any construction inspectors assigned to the
project by Albert A. Webb Associates.
11. Maintain files of information pertinent to the construction of the
improvements.
12. In company with authorized representatives of the City, the Contractor
and Landowners, perform final inspection of the work performed under
various contracts and m~ke recommendations as to acceptance of the
work.
ATTACHMENT "B'1
City of Fontana
DUTIES, RESPONSIBILITIES AND LIMITATIONS OF AUTHORITY
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTORS
1. Review the construction schedule prepared by the Contractor for
compliance with the Contract and give advice to the Project Monitor
concerning its acceptability.
2. Attend pre-construction conferences. Assist in arranging a schedule
of progress meetings and other job conferences as required in
consultation with the Project Monitor and Contract Supervisor.
3. Serve as the Project Monitor's liaison with the Contract Supervisor.
4. When required, assist the Contract Supervisor in obtaining from the
Contractor a list of his proposed suppliers and subcontractors.
5. Assist the Contract Supervisor in obtaining field samples of materials
delivered to the site which are required to be furnished and keep
records of actions taken by the Contract Supervisor.
6, Receive approved shop drawings and other submissions from the Contraot
Supervisor; record data received, maintain a file of the drawings and
submissions, and check construction for compliance with them.
7. Alert the Contractor's field superintendent when he observes materials
or equipment being installed before approval ef shop drawings or
samples, where such are required, and advise ~he Contract Supervisor
when he believes it is necessary to disapprove work as failing to
conform to the Contract DOcuments.
8. Conduct on-site observations of the work in progress for the Director
of Public Works as a basis for determining that the Project is pro-
ceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents.
9. Verify that tests required by the Contract Documents are conducted
and that adequate records thereof are maintained; observe, record and
report to the Project Monitor appropriate details relative to the
test procedures.
10. Accompany visiting inspectors representing public or other agencies
having jurisdiction over the Project, record the outcome of these
inspeqtions and report to the Project Monitor.
11. Censider and evaluate Contractor's suggestions for modifications in
drawings or specifications and report them with recommendations to
the Contract Supervisor and Project Monitor.
12. Keep a diary of log book, recording hours on the job site, weather
conditions, list of visiting officials, daily activities, decisions,
observations in general, and specific observations in more detail as
in the case of observing test procedures.
13. Maintain a set of drawings on which authorized changes are noted, and
deliver to the Project Monitor at the completion of the Project.
14. Furnish the Project Monitor daily written reports of progress of the
Project and Contractor's compliance with the approved construction
schedule.
15. Consult with the Contract Supervisor and Project Monitor in advance
of scheduled major tests or start of important phases of the Project.
16. Review applications for progress payment with the Contract Supervisor
and Project Monitor, noting particularly their relation to the work
completed and materials and equipment delivered at the site.
17. During the course of the work gather Assembly Guarantees, Certifi-
cates, Maintenance and Operation Manuals and other required data to
be furnished by the Contractor and deliver this material to the
Project Monitor for his approval and forwarding to the Director of
Public Works
18. Prior to final inspection, submit to the Contract Supervisor and
Project Monitor a list of observed items requiring correction and
verify .that each correction has been made.
19. Conduct final inspection in the company of the City Engineer, the
Contractor and the Project Monitor, and prepare a final list of items
to be corrected.
Page 2
20. Verify that all items on final list have been corrected and make
recommendations to the Contract Supervisor and Project Monitor
concerning acceptance.
21. LIMITATIONS OF AUTHORITY
Except upon written instructions of the City Engineer, the Inspector:
A. Shall not authorize any deviation from the Contract Drawings.
B, Shall not undertake any of the responsibilities of the
Contractor, the subcontractors or the Contractor's field
superintendent.
C,Shall not expedite the work for the Contractor.
D. Shall not advise on or issue directions relative to any aspect of
the construction technique of sequence unless a specific
technique or sequence is called for in the Contract Documents.
E.Shall not participate in specialized field or laboratory tests.
F. Shall not engage in or become a part of any disputes between the
Contractor and/or his su=bcontractors and/or material suppliers
involving labor disputes, work, materials deliveries, quality or
manner of workmanship, quality of materials, etc. (Where
reference is made to "Contract Supervisor" or "Project Monitor"
it shall also mean the City's Senior Construction Inspector if
desired by City).
~age 3
REP-1/86-25
' t ' EXHIBIT "A"
ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS
3788 McCray Street · Riverside, California · (714) 686-1070
SCHEDULE OF FEES
OFFICE ENGINEERING
Senior Consultant ............................. $75.00 Per Hour
Principal Engineer ........................... 65.00 Per Hour
Pro ect Engineer ............................. 55.00 Per Hour
Engmeer~Designer ........................... 50.00 Per Hour
Environmental Planner (Senior) ............ 45,00 Per Hour
Environmental Planner ...................... 40.00 Per Hour
Designer--Senior ........................... 48,00 Per Hour
Designer--Associate ........................ 45.00 Per Hour
Designer--Draftsman ....................... 43.00 Per Hour
Draftsman--Senior .......................... 40.00 Per Hour
Draftsman .................................... 35.00 Per Hour
Clerical ....................................... 18.00 Per Hour
FIELD SURVEYS
3-Man Party ................................. $156.00 Per Hour
2-Man Party ................................. 114.00 Per Hour
1-Man Party ................................. 65.00 Per Hour
Mileage ....................................... 50 Per Mile
Subsistence ................................. 35.00 Per Man/Day
Field Survey rates are subject to changes granted under terms
of the prevailing labor agreement.
MISCELLANEOUS
Expert Witness and Court Appearance .......... To Be Arranged
Prints .............................................. Cost
Telephone Toll Ch, arges ................... ' ....... Cost
Outside Service Charge. ......................... Cost Plus 15%
November I, 1985
,_~AI'EI March 9, 1989
PROJECT: City of Font~n~ ~ Foothill/Beech Sewer Project
NAME "ADDRESS PHONE NO
City of Fontana
CALIFORNIA
October 23, 1989
Mr. Carl Atkinson
Wheels, Etc.
15186 Foothill Boulevard
Fontana, California 92335
Subject: Foothill/Beech Sewer Project
Dear Mr. Atkinson:
This is to follow-up on a request you made when you visited
the City offices on October 3, 1989 and talked to Mr. Yousuf
Patanwala, who is the City's Project Manager for the
Foothill/Beech Sewer Project, and our subsequent telephone
communications on October 16, 1989.
Specifically, as I understand the issue, you were very
frustrated in that you had not heard from the City in many
months, as you, of course, were concerned about how the
project would impact your business operation. Specifically,
driveway access is not your main concern, but that the
trenching will go through your work area and you want some
guarantees as to when it will be restored.
At this time the City has been concentrating on resolving the
final project issues prior to advertising this project for
public bids, which should occur in late November or early
December, 1989. Further notifications to impacted properties
will be made in the near' term. This communication is being
sent as you had requested an update. We will set up a
meeting with you to specifically cover your concerns and how
we can handle them.
As we had discussed in a meeting last spring, this project
wil~ be constructed. We have secured enough temporary
construction easements to build the project on Foothill
Boulevard. At this time we are completing our final
environmental documentation and securing the remaining
necessary permits. We will mail you a copy of our proposed
8353 SIERRA AVENUE (P.O. BOX 518) FONTANA, CALIFORNIA 92334-0518 (714) 3507600
Page 2
October 23, 1989
environmental mitigation measures and keep you posted on the
date this item goes to the City Council, so that you have the
opportunity to express your concerns as you explained them to
Mr. Patanwala and myself.
As I had previously committed to you and the other business/
property owners along the project construction zone, we will
make every reasonable effort possible to mitigate the
proJect's impact on the properties in the area.
Please feel free to contact the undersigned at (714)
350-7613, should you have any further questions.
Very truly yours,
Robert W. Weddle
Interim City Engineer
RWW:ml
cc: A. Calvert
L. Donnell
Y. Patanwala
Shu-tai An, Hall & Foreman
E. Kobayashi
RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION
By
Project No.
Project Title 'F~oT~ ILl,-//~[[ C~
Individual ~E..' F"'~OI~I'~) Title
Organization '~i~O4'rcf-~'f 0~31~'E ~)!,~ I:~I~TftlLL_ Location
Subject F~1TI~ I~q~P (~ F~o~r OF ~P~,
ITEMS DISCUSSED ~ ~:~
~' ~0 IU ~ EAI2LIE~ ~L~ t~u~E~
COMMENTS OR ACTION REQUIRED
Wlley-Flsk Form 4-7
PRESLEY of SOUTHERN CALIFO NI
P~sident
~s. ~nnivo~ Calvort
~blic Works Director (a /
~blic Works Department
City of Fontaria
8353 Sierra Avenue
Fontaria, California 9233~
I wanted to ~hank you ve~ much for taking
your time and ~ou:r staf['s time to meet with us
regarding our project on Baseline. As we
discussed in Monday's meeting, I am hopeful that
we will be able to move fo~ard and get the
necessary infrastructure installed to our
project.
Once again, I want to reemphasize that we
are very willing to work with you and the City of
Fontana to accomplish our goal. We appreciate
your attitude and the City's for what seems to be
a strong willingness to help us down the road and
get this project built.
Again, many thanks for your time and we look
fo~ard to working with you on this project.
L. C. "BOb" Albertson, Jr.
LCA/dml
19 Corporate Plaza · Newport Beach, California 92660
Mailing Address: Post Office Box 6110 · Newport Beach, California 92658-6110
17~4) 640-6400 · FAX (714) 640-1643
qz~tra va ia ~ ck ~ S a ftd
P. O. BOx 2151"
M][XOOi~II'M[{]~!tY~M, Upland, California M 91785
Phone (714) 982-6713
October 10, 1989
City of Fontana
8353 Sierra Ave.
Fontana, Ca. 92335
Attention: Mr. Yousuf
Dear Mr. Yousuf:
In respect to the te].ephone conversation which we had regarding our
proposal to remove the necessary trees on Foothill Blvd. for the
widening project.
We will push the trees over, cut them up and haul the wood away free.
The only charge that you would incur would be the loading and trucking
of the stumps and brush plus the! dump fees.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
e~ely yours~
Bonald Willemsen
RW/lU
i& City of Fontana
CALIFOF~NIA
September 25, 1989
Shou-'rat An
Hall & Foreman
3170 Redhill Boulevard
Costa Hesa, CA
Subject: Contract Documents and Specifications for Construction of Sewer
Faciltty Improvements
Dear Shou-Tat,
Enclosed please find a sample copy of contract and specification document
prepared by BSI Consultants for a City project. These documents were recently
reviewed by the City Attorney's office and were found very acceptable (copy of
letter attached). Please make your draft copy of contract and specification
document for Foothill/Beech Sewer ProJect simtlar in forma~..to the sample copy.
This would help in expediting things at our end.
Please call me at 350-7661 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Yousuf Patanwala
Civil Engineering Assistant ZI!
AC:YP:wp
Enclosures
cc: Eobert W. Weddle
dohn Hogan, Hall & Foreman , ~
8353 SIERRA AVENUE (P.O. BOX 518) PONTANA, CALIFORNIA 92334-0518 (714) 350~7600
September 15, 1989
Jim Strodt eck
Redevel ment Project Coordinator
CITY FONTANA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
8353 mrra Avenue
~!~2335'
Re: Review of standard contract documents
Dear Jim:
When we spoke by telephone the other day, I indicated that I would
be reviewing the City's standard contract documents to make sure that
they are legally sufficient. ShortlF after our conversation, I received a
set prepared by BSI Consultants, Inc. for the Jurupa Industrial Park
storm drain improvements. My comments in this letter will pertain to
that contract set.
In short, that contract set looks pretty good. Although the General
Specifications do not contain all of the provisions required by law, they
do incorporate by reference the Standard Specifications for Public Works
Construction published by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern
Ca'Afornia Chapter of the American Public Works Association and the
Southern California District of the Associated General Contractors of
California (the "Green Book"), and the Green Book does contain all of the
legally-required provisions. Therefore, it appears that all of the bases
are covered.
The bidding documents, including the Notice Inviting Sealed Bids,
also look pretty good. They appear to contain all of the legally-required
provisions as well. I did notice that the Notice Inviting Sealed Bids, on
page B-l, and the Instructions to Bidders, on page IB-5, both make
reference to Government Code Section ~590, which permits the substitution
of 'securities in lieu of contract retentions. That provision has now been
relocated to the Public Contract Code, where it appears as Section 22300.
LAW OirFIC~:~5 OF
BE:ST, BE:ST & KRIIEGER
Jim Strodtbeck
Redevelopment Project Coordinator
CiTY OF FONTANA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
September 15, 1989
Page 2
Therefore, I would r~commend that both references be changed to Public
Contract Code Section 22300.
Furthermore, although Section 7-3.1 of the Special Provisions requires
the insurance certificate to contain a statement which provides that the
City is an additional insured, I noticed that the insurance certificate
accepted on that job failed to include that provision. Even if that
statement had appeared on the insurance certificate, it might not be
enforceable against the insurance company because language on an
insurance certificate does not alter or amend the policy itself. That
protection probably ought to be provided in the form of an endorsement,
instead of a statement on the insurance certificate. I have enclosed forms
of endorsements which we have prepared for your use in the future, and I
would recommend that your consulting engineers begin including these in
your standard contract set with appropriate language changes to the
Special Provisions to require 'these forms of endorsements to be provided
along with the insurance certificate.
I have also enclosed different forms of the Payment Bond and the
Performance Bond to be substituted in place of your current bond forms.
I believe that the enclosed bond forms are worded somewhat more
favorably. For example, the enclosed bond forms provide for payment of
attorney's fees if it becomes necessary for the City to sue on those
bonds.
Also enclosed is a form of Non-Collusion Affidavit which differs a
little from the form included in the contract set which I reviewed. The
form is now dictated by statute, and the enclosed form should be used in
the future because it complies precisely with current statutory
requirements.
Finally, please remember that the Redevelopment Agency is an entity
separate and distinct from the City itself. Therefore, if the
Redevelopment Agency enters into the contract, the City should not appear
as the contracting entity in the contract agreement. Instead, it should be
the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Fontana in those instances.
The BSI standard contract set looks pretty good, and I see no need to
hold up any contracts currently in process. However, I would recommend
just the couple of revisions discussed above with respect to future
contracts. Furthermore, I just recently saw a different contract set which
BEST, BEST & KRIEGER
Jim Strodtbeck
Redevelopment Project Coordinator
CITY OF FONTANA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
September 15, 1989
Page 3
the City appa'Fently ~zses in some circumstances. That contract set needs
more extensive revisions.
Sincerely,
Michael T. Riddell
of BEST, BEST & KRIEGER
City Attorneys for the
City of Fontana
MTR/lsl
Interim City Engineer
CITY OF FONTANA
8353 Sierra Avenue
Fontaria, CA 92335
GENERAL LZABZLZTY ENOQitSEXENT
CITY OF FONTANA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ("Redevelopmerit Agency")
8353 Sierra Avenue
Fontana, CA g2335
A. POLICY INFORMATION Endorsement ~
1. Insurance Company ; Policy Number
2. Policy Term (From) , {To) ; Endorsement Effective Date
3. Named Insured
4. Address of Named Insured
5. Limit of Liability Any One Occurrence/Aggregate $ /
6. Deductible or Self-Insured Retention (Nil unless otherwise specified): $
~7. Coverage is equivalent to:
: Comprehensive General Liability form GLO002 (Ed. 1/73)
Commercial General Liability "occurrence" form CGO001 °
8. Bodily Injury and Property Damage Coverage is:
"occurrence"
Note: The Redevelopment Agency's standard insurance requirements specify "occurrence" coverage.
"Claims-made" coverage is not acceptable. If cormercial general liability form or equivalent is used, the
general aggregate must apply separately to this location/project or the general aggregate must be twice the
occurrence limit.
9. Description of Project:
B. POLICY AHENDMENTS
This endorsement i s issued in consideration of the policy premium. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statex:4nt
in the policy to which this endorsement is attached or any other endorsement attached thereto, it is agreed as
follows:
1. INSURED. As respects any work performed on the above-described Project, the Redevelopment Agency, its
elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, consulting engineers, and volunteers are included
as insureds with regard to damages and defense of claims arising from: (a) activities performed by or
on behalf of the Named Insured, (b) products and completed operations of the Named Insured, or (c)
premises owned, leased or used by the Named Insured.
2. CON1)IBUTION NOT REQUIRED. As respects: (a) work performed by the Named Insured on the above-described
Project for or on behalf of the Rede~elopment Agency; or (b) products sold by the Named Insured to the
Redevelopmerit Agency for use on th(. Project; or (c) premises leased by the Named Insured from the
Redevelopmerit Agency, the insurance afforded by this policy shall be primary insurance as respects the
Redevelopmerit Agency, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, consulting engineers, or
volunteers; or stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Named Insured's scheduled underlying
primary coverage. In either event, ~ny other insurance maintained by the Redevelopmerit Agency, its
elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, consulting engineers, or volunteers shall be in
excess of this insurance and shall not contribute with it.
3. SCOPE OF COVERAGE. This policy, if primary, affords coverage at least as broad as:
(1) Insurancc Services Office form number GL 0002 (Ed. 1/73), Comprehensive General Liability
Insurance and Insurance Services Office form number GL 0404 Broad Form Comprehensive General
Liability endorsement; or
(2) Insurance Services Office Cummercial General Liability Coverage, "occurrence" form CG 0001; or
(3) If excess, affords coverage which is at least as broad as the primary insurance forms referenced
in the preceding sections (1} and (2).
4. SEVENABILITY OF INTEREST. ~he insurance afforded by this policy applies separately to each insured who
is seeking coverage or against whom a claim is made or a suit is brought, except with respects to the
Compan~'s limit of liability.
5. PROVISIONS REGARDING THE INSUREO'S DUTIES AFTER ACCIDENT OR LOSS. Any failure to comply with reporting
provisions of the policy shall not affect coverage provided to the Redevelopmerit Agency, its elected or
appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
6. CANCELLATION NOTICE. The insurance afforded by this policy shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled,
reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail
return receipt requested has been given to the Redevelopment Agency. Such notice shall be addressed as
: shown in the heading of this endorsement.
C. INCIDENT AND CLAIH REPORTING PROCEDURE
Incidents and claims are to be reported to the insurer at:
ATTN:
(Title) (Department)
(Company)
(Street Address)
(City) (State) (Zip Code)
( )
(Telephone Number)
O. SIGNATURE OF INSURER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE INSURER
I, , warrant that I have authority to bind the below listed
{print/type name)
insurance company and by my signature hereon do so bind this company.
SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (original signature
required on endorsement furntfhed to the Redevelopment Agency)
ORGANIZATION: TITLE:
ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: ( )
WORKERS' COMPENSATION/EI~LOYERS LIABILITY ENDORSEElIT
CITY OP FONTANA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ("Redevelopmerit Agency")
8353 Sierra Avenue
Fontaria, CA 92335
A. POLICY INPOR~IATION Endorsement #
1. Insurance Company , ("the Company")
Policy Number
2. Effective Date of This Endorsement
3. Named Insured
4. Employer's Liability Limit (Coverage B)
B. POLICY/~MENDMENTS
In consideration of the policy premiumand notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy to which this
endorsement is attached or any other endorsement attached thereto, it is agreed as follows:
1. Cancellation Notice. The insurance afforded by this policy shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled,
reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail
return receipt requested has been given to the Redevelopment Agency. Such notice shall be addressed as
shown in the heading of this endorsement.
2. Waiver of Subrogation. The Insurance Company agrees to waive all rights of subrogation against the
Redevelopment Agency, its elected or appeinted officers, officials, agents and employees for losses paid
under the terms of this policy which, arise from work performed by the Named Insured for the
Redevelopment Agency.
C. SIGNATURE OF INSURER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE INSURER
I, , warrant that I have authority to bind the below listed
{print/type name)
insurance company and by my signature hereon do so bind this company.
SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (original signature
required on endorsement furnished to the Redevelopment Agency)
ORGANIZATION: ' TITLE:
ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: ( )
:. .
AtlTOM(IBILE LIABILITY ENDORSEMEIIT
CITY OF FONTANA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ("Redevelopment Agency")
8353 Sierra Avenue
Fontaria, CA 92335.
A. POLICY INFORMATION Endorsement #
1. Insurance Company ; Policy Number
2. Policy Term (From)_ (To) ; Endorsement Effective Date
3. Named Insured
4. Address of Named Insured
5. Limit of Liability Any One Occurrence/Aggregate $ /
6. Deductible or Self-Insured Retention {Nil unless otherwise specified): $
B. POLICY AMENDMENTS
This endorsement is issued in consideration of the policy premium. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement
in the policy to which this endorsement is attached or any other endorsement attached thereto, it is agreed as
follows:
1. INSURED. The Redevelopment Agency, its elected or appointed officers, officials, consulting engineers,
employees and volunteers are included as insureds with regard to damages and defense of claims arising
from: the ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased, hired
or borrowed by the Named Insured, regardless of whether liability is attributable to the Named Insured
or a combination of the Named Insured and the Redevelopmerit Agency, its elected or appointed officers,
officials, employees or volunteers.
2, CONTRIBUTION NOT REQUIRED. As respects work performed by the Named Insured for or on behalf of the
Redevelopment Agency, the insurance afforded by this policy shall: (a) be primary insurance as respects
the Redevelopment Agency, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers; or (b)
stand i n an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Named Insured's primary coverage. In either event,
any other insurance maintained by the Redevelopment Agency, its elected or appointed officers,
officials, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of this insurance and shall not contribute with
it.
3. SCOPE OF COVERAGE. This policy, if primary, affords coverage to the Named Insured at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/78), Code 1 ("any auto") and endorsement
CA 0025.
(2) If excess, affords coverage which is at least as broad as the primary insurance forms referenced
in the preceding section (1).
4. SEVERXB. ILITY OF INTEREST. The insurance afforded by this policy applies separately to each insured who
is seeking coverage or against whom ~ claim is made or a suit is brought, except with respect to the
Company's limit of liability.
5. PROVISIONS REGARDING THE INSURED'S DUTIES AFTER ACCIDENT OR LOSS. Any failure to comply with reporting
provisions of the policy shall not affect coverage provided to the Redevelopment Agency, its elected or
appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
6. CANCELLATION NOTICE. The insurance afforded by this policy shall not be suspended, vuided, cancelled,
reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail
return receipt requested has been given to the Redevelopment Agency. Such notice shall be addressed as
shown in the heading of this endorsement,
C. INCIDENT AND CLAIM REPOrtiNG PROCEDURE
Incidents and claims are to be reported to the insurer at:
ATTN:
(Title} (Department}
{Company}
(Street Address)
(City) (State!) {Zip Code}
( )
(Telephone Number}
D. SIGNATURE OF INSURER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE INSURER
I, , warrant that I have authority to bind the below listed
(print/type name)
insurance company and by my signature hereon do se bind this company.
SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (original signature
required on endorsement furnished to the Redevelopment Agency)
ORGANIZATION: TITLE:
ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: { )
CONTRACT PERFORMANCE BOND
(CALIFOHNIA PUBLIC WORK)
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PREzSENTS:
THAT WHEREAS, the City of Fontana Redevelopment Agency
(sometimes r~ferred to hereinafter as "Obliges") has awarded
to
(hereinafter designated as the "Contractor"), an agreement
for the work described as follows:
(hereinafter referred to as the "Public Work"); and
WHEREAS, the work to be performed by the Contractor is more
particularly set forth in that certain contract for the said
Public Work dated , (hereinafter
referred to as the "Contract"), which Contract is incorpo-
rated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, the Contractor is required by said Contract to
perform the terms thereof and to provide a bond both for the
performance and guaranty thereof.
NOW~ THEREFORE, we, , the
undersigned Contractor, as Principal, and ,
a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
State of , and duly authorized to
transact business under the laws of the State of California,
as Surety, are held and. firmly bound unto the City of
Fontana Redevelopment Agency in the sum of
Dollars ($ ), said sum being not less than one
hundred percent (100%) of the total amount payable by the
said Obligee under the terms of the said Contract, for which
amount well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our
heirs, executors and administrators, successors and assigns,
jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that, if the
bounden Contractor, his or its heirs, executors, administra-
tors, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to
and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the cove-
nants, conditions and agreements in the said Contract and
any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or
its part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the
manner therein specified, and in all respects according to
their intent and meaning; and shall faithfully fulfill the
-1-
one year guarantee of all materials and workmanship; and
indemnify and save harmless the Obligee, its officers and
agents, as stipulated in said Contract, then this obligation
shall become null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain
in full force and effect.
The said Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and
agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or
addition to ~the terms of the Contract or to the work to be
performed thereunder or the Specifications accompanying the
same shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond,
and it does hereby waive notice of any such change,
extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of
the Contract or to the work or to the Specifications.
No final settlement between the Obligee and the Contractor
shall abridge the right of any beneficiary hereunder, whose
claim may be unsatisfied.
Contractor and Surety agree that if the Obligee is required
to .engage the services of an attorney in connection with
enforcement of the bond, each shall pay Obligee's reasonable
attorney's fees incurred, with or without suit, in addition
to the above sum.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals
this __ day of , 19__.
PRINCIPAL/CONTRACTOR:
By:
SURETY:
By:
Attorney-in-Fact
-2-
The rate of premium on this bond is per thousand.
The total amount of premium charged: $
(The above must be filled in by corporate surety).
IMPORTANT: Surety companies executing bonds must possess a
certificate of authority from the California Insurance
Commissioner authorizing them to write surety insurance
defined in ~ection 105 of the California Insurance Code, and
if the work or project is financed, in whole or in part,
with federal, grant or loan funds, it must also appear on
the Treasury Department's most current list (Circular 570 as
amended). THIS IS A REQUIRED FORM.
Any claims under this bond may be addressed to:
(Name and Address of Surety)
(Name and Address of agent
or representative for ser-
vice of process in California
if different from above)
(Telephone Number of Surety
and agent or representative
for service of process in
California).
-3-
S~A~ OF ~IFORNIA ~
) ss.
COUNTY OF )
On this day of , in the year ,
beEore me, , a Notary Public in ana"f~r
said State, personally appeared , known to
me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within
instrument as the'Attorney-in-Fact of the
(Surety) and acknowledged to me that he subscribed the name
of the (Surety) thereto and his own
name as Attorney-in-Fact.
Notary Public in and for said State
(SEAL)
Commission expires=
NOTE= A copy of the power of attorney to %ocal represen-
tatives of the bonding company must be attached
hereto.
-4-
MTR0135
(CALIFORNIA pUBLIC WORK.)
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
THAT WHEREAS, the City of Fontana Redevelopment Agency
{sometimes re erred to hereinafter as "Obliges") has awarded
to
(hereinafter designated as the "Contractor"), an agreement
dated , described as follows:
(hereinafter referred to as the "Contract"): and
WHEREAS, said Contractor is required to furnish a bond in
connection with said Contract, and pursuant to Section 3247
of the California Civil Code;
NOW, THEREFORE, We, , the
undersigned Contractor, as Principal; and ,
a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
State of , and duly authorized to
transact business under the laws of the State of California,
as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of
Fontana Redevelopment Agency and to any and all persons,
companies or corporations entitled to file stop notices
under Section 3181 of the California Civil Code, in the sum
of
Dollars
($ ), said sum being not less than one hundred
percent (100%) of the total amount payable by the said
Obliges under the terms of the said Contract, for which
payment will and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our
heirs, executors and administrators, successors and assigns,
jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that, if said
Contractor, his or its heirs, executors, administrators,
successors or assigns, or Subcontractors, shall fail to pay
for any materials, provisions or other supplies, implements,
mchinery or power used in, upon for or about the perform-
ance of the Public Work contracted to be done, or to pay any
person for any work or labor of any kind, or for bestowing
skills or other necessary services thereon, or for amounts
du6 under the Unemployment Insurance Code with respect to
such work or labor, or for any amounts required to be
deducted, withheld, and paid over to the Employment Develop-
ment Department from the wages of employees of said Con-
-1-
tractor and his Subcontractors pursuant to Section 13020 of
the Unemployment Insurance Code with respect to such work
and labor as required by the provisions of Section 3247
through 3252 of the Civil Code, the Surety or Sureties
hereon will pay for the same in an amount not exceeding the
sum specified in this bond, otherwise the above obligation
shall be void. In addition to the provisions hereinabove,
it is agreeg. that this bond will inure to the benefit of any
and all persons,. companies and corporations entitled to
serve stop notices under Section 3181 of the Civil Code, so
as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any
suit brought upon this bond.
The Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees
that no change, extension of time, alteration or additions
to the terms of the said Contract or to the work to be
performed thereunder or the Specifications accompanying the
same shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond,
and it does hereby waive notice of any such change,
extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of
the Contract or to the work or to the Specifications.
No final settlement between the Obliges and the Contractor
hereunder shall abridge the right of any beneficiary here-
under, whose claim may be unsatisfied.
Contractor and Surety agree that if the Obliges is required
to engage the services of an attorney in connection with the
enforcement of this bond, each shall pay Obligee's reason-
able attorney's fees incurred, with or without suit, in
addition to the above sum.,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals
this __ day of , 19__.
PRINCIPAL/CONTRACTOR:
By:
SURETY:
By:
Attorney-in-Fact
-2-
IMPORTANT: Surety companies executing bonds must possess a
certificate of authority from the California Insurance
Commissioner authorizing them to write surety insurance
defined in Section 105 of the California Insurance Code, and
if the work or project is financed, in whole or in part,
with federal, grant or loan funds, it must also appear on
the Treasury Department's most current list (Circular 570 as
amended).
TSIS IS A R UIRE
Any claims under this bond may be addressed to:
(Name and Address of Surety)
(Name and Address of agent:
or representative for ser-
vice of process in California
if different from above)
(Telephone Number of Surety
and agent or representative
for service of process in
California).
-3-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF )
On this day of , in the year ,
before me, , a Notary Public in ana'Far
said State,~_personally appeared , known to
me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within
instrument as the Attorney-in-Fact of the
(Surety) and acknowledged to me that he subscribed the name
of the (Surety) thereto and his own
name as Attorney-in-Fact.
Notary Public in and for said State
(SEAL)
Commission expires:
NOTE: A copy of the power of attorney to local represen-
tatives of the bonding company must be attached
hereto.
-4-
MTR0 13 5A
STATE OF CALIFORNIA §
§ NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT
COUNT'Y OF §
, being first duly sworn, deposes and
(Name of Affiant)
says that he/st~ is of ,
(Title) (Name of Bidder)
the party making the foregoing bid; that the bid is not made in the
interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company,
association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not
collusive or sham; that the bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or
solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid, and has not
directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any
bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain
from bidding; that the bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly,
sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the
bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit,
or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other bidder, or to secure
any advantage against the public body awarding the contract of anyone
interested in the proposed contract; that all statements contained in the bid
are true; and, further, that the bidder has not, directly or indirectly,
submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents
thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will
not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association,
organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate
a collusive or sham bid.
( Signature )
(Typed Name)
SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME 0n this day of , 19
Notary Public
My Commission Expires:
CZTY OF FONTANA ~
TO: NefiVORY CALVERT
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
FROIh YOUSUF PATAINALA ~'
CIVIL E]~GINEERING ASSISTANT IIl
DATE: AUGUST 29° 1989
RE: FOOTHILL/BEECH SEttER PRO,1ECT STATUS REPORT
The followlng items are the principal tssues on this project.
A. Caltrans Construction Permit
According to Hall & Foreman's project manager, Shou-Tai
An, Caltrans will be reinstating their permit once the
manhole revisions have been made to reorient the manhole
covers more towards the curb side and less In the
traffic lane. The City will issue a non-objection
letter to Caltrans regardt'ng removal of trees along the
project site. Greg Bucknell has been working on the
tree issues both for Village of Heritage and City sewer
projects.
B. Railroad Permit
Mall & Foreman has applied for a permit with Southern
Pacific Railroad, but has not received any response from
t~he railroad.
C. Temporary Construction Easement
Mr. Kobtyasht has been able to get temporary
construction easement on Beech Avenue from 12 property
owners of the 16. The remaining 4 property owners have
informed Hr. Kobtyasht that they will sign the easement
deed. (Please see attached memorandum from
Kobtyashi.)
Foothi 11/Beech Sewer Project Status
Page Two
D. ~as Line
There is a Southern California Gas Company gas main
located 4' to 5' south of the north R/W line of Foothill
Boulevard. They have previously agreed to move the line
to one foot south of the north R/W line. Currently the
Gas Company is preparing to work east from Cherry Avenue
to move the gas line completely to the south side of
Foothill. If the gas line is relocated to the south
side of the street, there ~vill be no need to protect the
'line for construction. According to the Gas Company
representative, Mr. Ciejka, they are working with
Caltrans to obtain a permit for their project. Once the
permit is obtained, it will take the Gas Copany five
weeks to shift their line between Cherry and Beech
Avenues. The remaining pointion will be completed within
'the next one to one and one-half week's time.
E. Preparation of Bid Package
V Hall and Foreman is required to make necessary revisions
on the plan to satisfy Caltrans requirements, to show
;proper delineation where temporary construction
,easements are available, to indicate City and County
boundary lines and to show areas where trees can be
removed and where they cannot be removed.
Specifications should be prepared for the project with
an alternate item for protection of the trees.
F. Subsurface Soil Investiqation
The City Attorney's office has reviewed the consultant
agreement of C.H.O. Geotechnical Inc. for subsurface
soil investigation. The revised agreement was sent back
to C.H.O. for their approval and signature.
YP:ml
cc: Robert W. Weddle
CZTY OF FONTANA
MIEMOItAII~M
TO: Robert W. Weddle, P.E.
U
FROM: Consultin~ Project ~ng(n;er.
DATE: August 21, 1989
RE: F~thill ~ulevard Trunk )r - I~n-obj~tion for Tr~ R~val
(Phase I - frm Cherry Avenue to )l~k Avenue)
(Phase II - frm ~l~:k Avenue to B~h Avenue)
(Phase IIX- frm B~h Avenue to Lira Avenue)
Per your request, enclosed for your review is a typical trench detail for the
sewer, storm drain, and water improvements along the north right-of-way on
Foothill Boulevard.
On The Village of Herltage's Phase I from Cherry Avenue to Hemlock Avenue, the
construction of the sewer, storm and water will necessitate the removal of the
trees at this time.
On the City's Phase II from Hemlock Avenue to Beech Avenue, the construction of
the sewer may not necessitate the tree removal, but the Fontaria Water Company's
plans to extend a 12" waterline from Cherry Avenue to Beech Avenue for The
Village of Heritage project will.
For the City's Phase IZl from Beech Avenue to Lime Avenue, the centerline for
the sewer construction will be ten {10) feet from the centerline of the trees.
The excavation of the sewer trench will bring the construction within five {5)
feet of the trees. The survival of the trees may be debatable due to the
construction operation cutting the tree roots. It is recommended that the
project be bid with tree removal and trees protected-in-place alternatives.
Another factor to be considered should be the future roadway widening.
Further, I recommend the Non-objection for Tree Removal Letter to Celttans
should be for all three phases and determine the status of the tree removal for
Phase I11 at a later date. The Celttans permit request is for all three
phases.
cc: Annivory Calvert
Yousuf Patanwala
CIVIL ENGINEER5 · LAND SURVEYOR,; , LAND PLANNER,; ~)c'~' ~/,,
D~VISION OF PROJECT 2000, INC
July 26, 1989 ,~.L.'
Mr. John O'Sullivan
City Manager /
C~::y of ~ontana
8353 Sierra A?enue
~.O, Box 5~8
Fontaria, CA 92334
Dear Mr. O'Sullivan:
I would like to thank you for meeting with A1 Uman, Presley
of Southern California, Jerry Linton, Citation Builders and
myself on Tuesday, July 25, 1989.
In order to keep from having any confusion as to the
results of that meeting, I wanted to summarize my
understanding of the issues discussed.
Issue: Foothill/Beech Sewer Trunk Line
Result: You have instructed the Engineering Department to
make ~he completion of this project a priority.
Issue: Sewer Treatment Plant Capacity
Result: It is your opinion that the Chino Basin has a
responsibility to handle this area's sewage. You stated
you are waitin~ for the Attorney's response and will inform
us as soon as possible.
Issue: Condition ~2 & 10, Tract 13929 C.F.D.
Result~ I will meet with Paul Ireland about the validity
of adding this condition. Also, I will investigate the
possiblility Of doing a Fiscal Analysis of the tract prior
to the Council Hearing.
1
(714) llE-9400
27007 FIFTH STREET · HIGHLAND. CALIFORNIA 92346
~ .~N, INC. TEL: 71a-641-0170 Au9 11,89 15:36 No.015 P.02
AuguSt 11, 1989
Calftens
~n Be~n~ino~ ~ 92403
Attention: Mike Miles
Foothill Blvd. )-~~o
Regardingl Tree Removal on ~ [ '-;-.
The existing trees located in
Boulevard are in conflict with the future improvements ~o be
installed in the aforementioned right-o=-way.
~ese trees ~eed to be removed in order to acco~odate the
installation of sewer, water, stom drain, and widening of the
future travelway. We, there=ore, give Our consent for the
removal of the trees in ~estion.
City of Fontana
August 3, 1989
Mr. Gregg Bucknell
Public Works Department
City.of Fontana
P. O.-Box 518
Fontana, CA 92335
Re: Removal of Trees
Foothill Sewer & Storm Drain
Between Cherry & Hemlock
Dear Greg,
Pursuant to our conversation today, attached please find a rough
draft of the letter addressed to Cal-Trans which references the
removal of the existing eucalyptus trees at the above-referenced
location.
It is very important to process this at your earliest
convenience. I would appreciate it i£ you could personally
contact me once the letter is executed so I can send someone to
hand-carry it to Cal-Trans.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.
Very truly yours,
FONTANA HERITAGE WEST
END ASSOCIATES
ACalifornia limited
partnership
Roger D. Hatch
Vice President Construction
and Engineering
RDH/cjs
cc: Ron Buckley, Annivory Calvert, Doug Ford, John Hogan
230 Newport Center Drive · Suite 300 · Newport Beach, CA 92660-7511 · (714) 720-1166 · FAX (714) 720-1392
· _ EL 714-641-0170 03,89 11:15 No.OO5 P.02
August 3, i989 JN 3809-004
41,51.L13
Caltrane
Permits Section
P.O. Box 231
247 W. Third Street
San Bernardino, CA 92402
Attentlon: Hank Lewandowski
Regarding: Foothill Slvd. Sewer and Storm Drain
Required Tree Removal (Permit # 88-UK-1169)
This letter is to inform Caltrans that the City of Fontana
has no objection to the removal of eucalyptus trees within
the Foothill Blvd. (RoUte 66) right-of-way between Cherry
Avenue and Hemlock Avenue.
The impacts of the construction of the subject facilities and
the widening of the north side of Foothill Blvd. was
addreSSed in the Environmental Impact RepOrt for the West End
Speclflc Plan.
Sincerely,
CITY OF FONTANA
Annivory Calvert
Director of Public Works
cc: Roger Hatch - Fontana Heritage
John Hogan -
Sierra Enqineerinq
CIVIL ENI~INEERS · LAND SURVEYOR5 ', LAND PLANNERS ~: ,, ~
DIVISION OF Pf~(DJECT 2000, INC. CC ' /
July 26, 1989 . ~}~
Mr. John O'Sullivan JUt 28
City Manager . u~.~
City o[ Fontana j~/
8353 Sierra Avenue
P.O. Box 518
Fontaria, CA 92334
Dear Mr. O'Sullivan{
I would like to thank you for meeting with Al'Uman, Presley
of Southern California, Jerry Linton, Citation Builders and
myself on Tueeday, July 25, 1989.
In order to keep from having any confusion as to the
results of that meeting, I wanted to summarize my
understanding of the issues discussed.
Issue{ Foothill/Beech Sewer Trunk Line
Result: You have instructed the Engineering Department to
make the completion of this project a priority.
Issue: Sewer Treatment Plant Capacity
Result: It is your opinion that the Chino Basin has a
responsibility to handle this area's sewage. You stated
you are waiting for the Attorney's response and will inform
us as soon as possible.
Issue: Condition #2 & 10, Tract 13929 C.F.D.
Result: I will meet with Paul Ireland about the validity
of adding this condition. Also, I will investigate the
possiblility Of doing a Fiscal Analysis of the tract prior
to the Council Hearing.
1
C714) 111-14OO
27007 FIFTH STREET ,, HIGHLAND, CALIFORNIA 92346
If this does not coincide with your understanding of the
results of our meeting, please contact me.
Sincerely,
PROJECT 2000, INC./
Sierra Engineering
E. J. (Bud) Roberrs
President
EjR/nr
88-046
cc: A1 Uman