Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Appendix I - Noise Analysis
Maple Apartments NOISE ANALYSIS CITY OF FONTANA Prepared by: William Maddux bmaddux@urbanxroads.com (619) 778-1971 Noah Johnson njohnson@urbanxroads.com June 11, 2024 15975-02 Noise Study.docx a Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................. I APPENDICES ......................................................................................................................................... II LIST OF EXHIBITS .................................................................................................................................. II LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................... III LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS ............................................................................................................. IV EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... 5 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Site Location .................................................................................................................................. 7 1.2 Project Description ........................................................................................................................ 7 2 FUNDAMENTALS ....................................................................................................................... 11 2.1 Range of Noise ............................................................................................................................ 11 2.2 Noise Descriptors ........................................................................................................................ 12 2.3 Sound Propagation ...................................................................................................................... 12 2.4 Noise Control .............................................................................................................................. 13 2.5 Noise Barrier Attenuation ........................................................................................................... 13 2.6 Land Use Compatibility With Noise ............................................................................................ 13 2.7 Community Response to Noise ................................................................................................... 13 2.8 Vibration ..................................................................................................................................... 14 3 REGULATORY SETTING .............................................................................................................. 17 3.1 State of California Noise Requirements ...................................................................................... 1 7 3.2 State of California Building Code ................................................................................................ 17 3.3 City of Fontana General Plan Noise Element .............................................................................. 18 3.4 Operational Noise Standards ...................................................................................................... 18 3.5 Construction Noise Standards..................................................................................................... 19 3.6 Construction Vibration Standards ............................................................................................... 20 4 SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA ............................................................................................................ 21 4.1 Noise Level Increases (Threshold A) ........................................................................................... 21 4.2 Vibration (Threshold B) ............................................................................................................... 21 4.3 CEQA Guidelines Not Further Analyzed (Threshold C) ............................................................... 22 4.4 Significance Criteria Summary .................................................................................................... 22 5 EXISTING NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS ................................................................................... 23 5.1 Measurement Procedure and Criteria ........................................................................................ 23 5.2 Noise Measurement Locations ................................................................................................... 23 5.3 Noise Measurement Results ....................................................................................................... 25 6 METHODS AND PROCEDURES.................................................................................................... 27 6.1 FHWA Traffic Noise Prediction Model ........................................................................................ 27 6.2 On-Site Traffic Noise Prediction Model Inputs ........................................................................... 27 6.3 Off-Site Traffic Noise Prediction Model ...................................................................................... 28 7 ON-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS .............................................................................................. 29 7.1 On-Site Exterior Noise Analysis ................................................................................................... 29 7.2 On-Site Interior Noise Analysis ................................................................................................... 29 Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx ii 8 OFF-SITE TRANSPORTATION NOISE IMPACTS ............................................................................ 33 9 RECEIVER LOCATIONS................................................................................................................ 35 10 OPERATIONAL NOISE ANALYSIS ................................................................................................ 37 10.1 Operational Noise Sources .......................................................................................................... 37 10.3 CadnaA Noise Prediction Model ................................................................................................. 39 10.4 Project Operational Noise Levels ................................................................................................ 40 10.5 Project Operational Noise Level Compliance .............................................................................. 40 10.6 Project Operational Noise Level Increases ................................................................................. 41 11 CONSTRUCTION ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................ 43 11.1 Typical Construction Noise Levels ............................................................................................... 43 11.2 Typical Construction Reference Noise Levels ............................................................................. 43 11.3 Typical Construction Noise Analysis............................................................................................ 45 11.4 Typical Construction Noise Level Compliance ............................................................................ 46 11.5 Construction Vibration Analysis .................................................................................................. 46 12 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................. 49 13 CERTIFICATION .......................................................................................................................... 51 APPENDICES APPENDIX 3.1: CITY OF FONTANA MUNICIPAL CODE APPENDIX 5.1: NOISE MEASUREMENT PHOTOS APPENDIX 5.2: NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENT WORKSHEETS APPENDIX 7.1: ON-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE WORKSHEETS APPENDIX 10.1: HVAC APPENDIX 10.2: OPERATIONAL MODEL APPENDIX 11.1: CONSTRUCTION NOISE MODEL LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT 1-A: LOCATION MAP .............................................................................................................. 8 EXHIBIT 1-B: PROJECT SITE PLAN .......................................................................................................... 9 EXHIBIT 2-A: TYPICAL NOISE LEVELS .................................................................................................. 11 EXHIBIT 2-B: NOISE LEVEL INCREASE PERCEPTION ............................................................................. 14 EXHIBIT 2-C: TYPICAL LEVELS OF GROUND-BORNE VIBRATION .......................................................... 16 EXHIBIT 5-A: NOISE MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS ............................................................................... 24 EXHIBIT 9-A: RECEIVER LOCATIONS ................................................................................................... 36 EXHIBIT 10-A: OPERATIONAL NOISE SOURCE LOCATIONS .................................................................. 38 EXHIBIT 11-A: CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND RECEIVER LOCATIONS .............................................. 44 Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx iii LIST OF TABLES TABLE ES-1: SUMMARY OF CEQA SIGNIFICANCE FINDINGS .................................................................. 5 TABLE 3-1: OPERATIONAL NOISE STANDARDS ................................................................................... 19 TABLE 3-2: CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVEL STANDARDS ....................................................................... 20 TABLE 4-1: SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA SUMMARY .................................................................................. 22 TABLE 5-1: 24-HOUR AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS .......................................................... 25 TABLE 6-1: ON-SITE ROADWAY PARAMETERS ................................................................................... 27 TABLE 6-2: TIME OF DAY VEHICLE SPLITS ........................................................................................... 28 TABLE 6-3: DISTRIBUTION OF TRAFFIC FLOW BY VEHICLE TYPE (VEHICLE MIX) ................................... 28 TABLE 7-1: EXTERIOR NOISE LEVELS (CNEL) ....................................................................................... 29 TABLE 7-2: FIRST FLOOR INTERIOR NOISE IMPACTS (CNEL) ................................................................ 30 TABLE 7-3: SECOND FLOOR INTERIOR NOISE IMPACTS (CNEL) ........................................................... 30 TABLE 7-4: THIRD FLOOR INTERIOR NOISE IMPACTS (CNEL) ............................................................... 31 TABLE 10-1: REFERENCE NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS ..................................................................... 39 TABLE 10-2: DAYTIME PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVELS ............................................................. 40 TABLE 10-3: NIGHTTIME PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVELS ......................................................... 40 TABLE 10-4: OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL COMPLIANCE ...................................................................... 41 TABLE 10-5: DAYTIME PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL INCREASES ............................................ 42 TABLE 10-6: NIGHTTIME OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL INCREASES ....................................................... 42 TABLE 11-1: TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION REFERENCE NOISE LEVELS ....................................................... 45 TABLE 11-2: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT NOISE LEVEL SUMMARY ................................................... 45 TABLE 11-3: TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVEL COMPLIANCE ...................................................... 46 TABLE 11-4: VIBRATION SOURCE LEVELS FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ...................................... 46 TABLE 11-5: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT VIBRATION LEVELS ........................................................... 47 Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx iv LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS (1)Reference ADT Average Daily Traffic ANSI American National Standards Institute Calveno California Vehicle Noise CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level dBA A-weighted decibels EPA Environmental Protection Agency FHWA Federal Highway Administration FTA Federal Transit Administration Leq Equivalent continuous (average) sound level Lmax Maximum level measured over the time interval Lmin Minimum level measured over the time interval mph Miles per hour OPR Office of Planning and Research Project Maple Apartments REMEL Reference Energy Mean Emission Level Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Urban Crossroads, Inc. has prepared this noise analysis to determine the potential noise impacts and the necessary noise mitigation measures, if any, for the Maple Apartments (“Project”). The Project is located at 8066 North Maple Avenue on the southwest corner of the intersection of Barbee Street and Maple Avenue in the City of Fontana. It is our understanding that the Project consists of a 265-unit apartment complex on approximately 8.1 acres. The results of this Maple Apartments Noise Analysis are summarized below based on the significance criteria in Section 4 of this report, consistent with Appendix G of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. (1) Table ES-1 shows the findings of significance for each potential noise and/or vibration impact under CEQA. TABLE ES-1: SUMMARY OF CEQA SIGNIFICANCE FINDINGS Analysis Report Section Significance Findings Unmitigated Mitigated On-Site Noise1 7 NA NA Off-Site Noise 8 Less Than Significant - Operational Noise 10 Less Than Significant - Construction Noise 11 Less Than Significant - Construction Vibration Less Than Significant - 1 Impacts of the environment on a project are excluded from CEQA. Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 6 This page was intentionally left blank. Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 7 1 INTRODUCTION This noise analysis has been completed to determine the noise impacts associated with the development of the Maple Apartments (“Project”). This noise analysis briefly describes the Project, provides information regarding noise fundamentals, describes the local regulatory setting, and provides the study methods and procedures for noise analysis. 1.1 SITE LOCATION The Project is located at 8066 North Maple Avenue on the southwest corner of the intersection of Barbee Street and Maple Avenue in the City of Fontana, as shown in Exhibit 1-A. The Project site is generally bordered to the north, east, and south by residential land uses. Commercial uses border the site to the west. The nearest airport is the San Bernardino International Airport, which is approximately 9 miles southeast of the Project site. 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION It is our understanding that the Project is to consist of a 265-unit apartment complex on 8.1 acres. The preliminary site plan for the Project is shown in Exhibit 1-B. The Project will be developed as a single phase with an opening year of 2026. Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 8 EXHIBIT 1-A: LOCATION MAP j ___l_M1IIH AYl!{K,le r a rfuSL!ffl ~ I ......... "' .. " J ... ,. .. o,.,. f t ~ T~rySlrttl l..o1uretOnw ReedSttett Fciotfil Bou~i:.ct...: Raymond Couir FarneyAVffll.M' Ramona Awnue l..o1ur~Dnw Vine Street UptandAvenue SMIie Avenue PtKlflc flf'CttiC Trail • r ----------------------------- p j ] ,.,.,,(>N ouevird ii ! >namroca:.trfft Eman~lj(oun z <I i ~ f 1 J r n Jacinta AYt!nue J f ~cow, MIUerAwnue Tert)'Streft f f Barbep~•.::::..,. _ --- 1 i L Site : -, I ::;.;;;::::::;;;:::::::-;-L ___ ~• i f McC.uleyStreet '!!I p . Arrow Boulevard ' •1 J I I I € 1! f _ I -! 1 \Jalenc»A'f'!nue i j 2 f • §_ WtseWibaShStrttt ~ I WtstHottyStrtet WntEttwandaA~ V,r91r10 Pr1m1ost Ek~,uory School Wes.tVK:t0rr4Stlfft ! I f . • I I '" ~ • l ! t I ~ We~ V~n K~lng 5tffft Wes1 1/Ktona Street i 3 i i i I I iFO,~e Strttt West Grow StrHl West2nd5trffl: West z ~ z l ~ f a i ; """' _W~stfooth1U . l o.- -Wj © enStreetMap (and) contributors CC-BY-SA Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 9 EXHIBIT 1-B: PROJECT SITE PLAN Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 10 This page was intentionally left blank. Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 11 2 FUNDAMENTALS Noise has been simply defined as “unwanted sound.” Sound becomes unwanted when it interferes with normal activities, when it causes actual physical harm, or when it has adverse effects on health. Noise is measured on a logarithmic scale of sound pressure level known as a decibel (dB). A-weighted decibels (dBA) approximate the subjective response of the human ear to broad frequency noise source by discriminating against very low and very high frequencies of the audible spectrum. They are adjusted to reflect only those frequencies which are audible to the human ear. Exhibit 2-A presents a summary of the typical noise levels and their subjective loudness and effects that are described in more detail below. EXHIBIT 2-A: TYPICAL NOISE LEVELS Source: Environmental Protection Agency Office of Noise Abatement and Control, Information on Levels of Environmental Noise Requisite to Protect Public Health and Welfare with an Adequate Margin of Safety (EPA/ONAC 550/9-74-004) March 1974. 2.1 RANGE OF NOISE Since the range of intensities that the human ear can detect is so large, the scale frequently used to measure intensity is a scale based on multiples of 10, the logarithmic scale. The scale for measuring intensity is the decibel scale. Each interval of 10 decibels indicates a sound energy ten times greater than before, which is perceived by the human ear as being roughly twice as loud. (2) The most common sounds vary between 40 dBA (very quiet) to 100 dBA (very loud). Normal conversation at three feet is at roughly 60 dBA, while loud jet engine noises equate to 110 dBA at approximately 100 feet, which can cause serious discomfort. (3) Another important aspect of noise is the duration of the sound and the way it is described and distributed in time. COMMON OUTDOOR COMMON INDOOR ACTIVITIES ACTIVlrlES THRESHOLD OF PAIN NEAR JET ENGINE JET FLY-OVER AT 300m (1000ft) ROCK BAND LOUD AUTO HORN GAS LAWN MOWER AT 1m (3 ft) DIESEL TRUCK AT 1 Sm (50 ft), FOOD BLENDER AT 1m (3 ft) at 80 km/hr (50 mph) NOISY URBAN AREA, DAYTIME VACUUM CLEANER AT 3m (10 ft) HEAVY TRAFFIC AT 90m (300 ft) NORMAL SPEECH AT 1m (3 ft) QUIET URBAN DAYTIME LARGE BUSINESS OFFICE QUIET URBAN NIGHmME THEATER, LARGE CONFERENCE ROOM (BACKGROUND) QUIET SUBURBAN NIGHTTIME LIBRARY BEDROOM AT NIGHT, CONCERT QUIET RURAL NIGHmME HALL (BACKGROUND) BROADCAST /RECORDING STUDIO LOWEST THRESHOLD OF HUMAN LOWEST THRESHOLD OF HUMAI"~ HEARING HEARING A· WEIGHTED SOUND LEVEL dBA 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 so 40 30 20 10 0 SUBJECTIVE LOUDNESS V RVNOIIY LOUP MODERATE FAINT VERY FAINT EFFECTS OF NOISE SPEEOi INTERFEllENa SLEEP DISTURBANCE ND EFFECT Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 12 2.2 NOISE DESCRIPTORS Environmental noise descriptors are generally based on average, rather than instantaneous, noise levels. The most commonly used figure is the equivalent level (Leq). Equivalent sound levels are not measured directly but are calculated from sound pressure levels typically measured in A-weighted decibels (dBA). The equivalent sound level (Leq) represents a steady state sound level containing the same total energy as a time varying signal over a given sample period (typically one hour) and is commonly used to describe the “average” noise levels within the environment. Peak hour or average noise levels, while useful, do not completely describe a given noise environment. Noise levels lower than peak hour may be disturbing if they occur during times when quiet is most desirable, namely evening and nighttime (sleeping) hours. To account for this, the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL), representing a composite 24-hour noise level is utilized. The CNEL is the weighted average of the intensity of a sound, with corrections for time of day, and averaged over 24 hours. The time of day corrections require the addition of 5 decibels to dBA Leq sound levels in the evening from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., and the addition of 10 decibels to dBA Leq sound levels at night between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. These additions are made to account for the noise sensitive time periods during the evening and night hours when sound appears louder. CNEL does not represent the actual sound level heard at any time, but rather represents the total sound exposure. The City of Fontana relies on the 24-hour CNEL level to assess land use compatibility with transportation-related noise sources. 2.3 SOUND PROPAGATION When sound propagates over a distance, it changes in level and frequency content. The way noise reduces with distance depends on the following factors. 2.3.1 GEOMETRIC SPREADING Sound from a localized source (i.e., a stationary point source) propagates uniformly outward in a spherical pattern. The sound level attenuates (or decreases) at a rate of 6 dB for each doubling of distance from a point source. Highways consist of several localized noise sources on a defined path and hence can be treated as a line source, which approximates the effect of several point sources. Noise from a line source propagates outward in a cylindrical pattern, often referred to as cylindrical spreading. Sound levels attenuate at a rate of 3 dB for each doubling of distance from a line source. (2) 2.3.2 GROUND ABSORPTION The propagation path of noise from a highway to a receiver is usually very close to the ground. Noise attenuation from ground absorption and reflective wave canceling adds to the attenuation associated with geometric spreading. Traditionally, the excess attenuation has also been expressed in terms of attenuation per doubling of distance. This approximation is usually sufficiently accurate for distances of less than 200 feet. For acoustically hard sites (i.e., sites with a reflective surface between the source and the receiver, such as a parking lot or body of water), no excess ground attenuation is assumed. For acoustically absorptive or soft sites (i.e., those sites with an absorptive ground surface between the source and the receiver such as soft dirt, grass, or scattered bushes and trees), an excess ground attenuation value of 1.5 dB per doubling of distance is normally assumed. When added to the cylindrical spreading, the excess ground attenuation results in an overall drop-off rate of 4.5 dB per doubling of distance from a line source. (4) Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 13 2.3.3 ATMOSPHERIC EFFECTS Receivers located downwind from a source can be exposed to increased noise levels relative to calm conditions, whereas locations upwind can have lowered noise levels. Sound levels can be increased at large distances (e.g., more than 500 feet) due to atmospheric temperature inversion (i.e., increasing temperature with elevation). Other factors such as air temperature, humidity, and turbulence can also have significant effects. (2) 2.3.4 SHIELDING A large object or barrier in the path between a noise source and a receiver can substantially attenuate noise levels at the receiver. The amount of attenuation provided by shielding depends on the size of the object and the frequency content of the noise source. Shielding by trees and other such vegetation typically only has an “out of sight, out of mind” effect. That is, the perception of noise impact tends to decrease when vegetation blocks the line-of-sight to nearby residences. However, for vegetation to provide a substantial, or even noticeable, noise reduction, the vegetation area must be at least 15 feet in height, 100 feet wide and dense enough to completely obstruct the line-of-sight between the source and the receiver. This size of vegetation may provide up to 5 dBA of noise reduction. The FHWA does not consider the planting of vegetation to be a noise abatement measure. (4) 2.4 NOISE CONTROL Noise control is the process of obtaining an acceptable noise environment for an observation point or receiver by controlling the noise source, transmission path, receiver, or all three. This concept is known as the source-path-receiver concept. In general, noise control measures can be applied to these three elements. 2.5 NOISE BARRIER ATTENUATION Effective noise barriers can reduce noise levels by up to 10 to 15 dBA, cutting the loudness of traffic noise in half. A noise barrier is most effective when placed close to the noise source or receiver. Noise barriers, however, do have limitations. For a noise barrier to work, it must be high enough and long enough to block the path of the noise source. (4) 2.6 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY WITH NOISE Some land uses are more tolerant of noise than others. For example, schools, hospitals, churches, and residences are more sensitive to noise intrusion than commercial or industrial developments and related activities. As ambient noise levels affect the perceived amenity or livability of a development, so too can the mismanagement of noise impacts impair the economic health and growth potential of a community by reducing the area’s desirability as a place to live, shop and work. For this reason, land use compatibility with the noise environment is an important consideration in the planning and design process. The FHWA encourages State and Local government to regulate land development in such a way that noise-sensitive land uses are either prohibited from being located adjacent to a highway, or that the developments are planned, designed, and constructed in such a way that noise impacts are minimized. (5) 2.7 COMMUNITY RESPONSE TO NOISE Community responses to noise may range from registering a complaint by telephone or letter, to initiating court action, depending upon everyone’s susceptibility to noise and personal attitudes about noise. Several factors are related to the level of community annoyance including: Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 14 x Fear associated with noise-producing activities; x Socio-economic status and educational level; x Perception that those affected are being unfairly treated; x Attitudes regarding the usefulness of the noise-producing activity; x Belief that the noise source can be controlled. Approximately ten percent of the population has a very low tolerance for noise and will object to any noise not of their making. Consequently, even in the quietest environment, some complaints will occur. Twenty-five percent of the population will not complain even in very severe noise environments. Thus, a variety of reactions can be expected from people exposed to any given noise environment. (6) Surveys have shown that about ten percent of the people exposed to traffic noise of 60 dBA will report being highly annoyed with the noise, and each increase of one dBA is associated with approximately two percent more people being highly annoyed. When traffic noise exceeds 60 dBA or aircraft noise exceeds 55 dBA, people may begin to complain. (6) Despite this variability in behavior on an individual level, the population can be expected to exhibit the following responses to changes in noise levels as shown on Exhibit 2-B. A change of 3 dBA is considered barely perceptible, and changes of 5 dBA are considered readily perceptible. (4) EXHIBIT 2-B: NOISE LEVEL INCREASE PERCEPTION 2.8 VIBRATION Per the(FTA) Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, vibration is the periodic oscillation of a medium or object. The rumbling sound caused by the vibration of room surfaces is called structure- borne noise. Sources of ground-borne vibrations include natural phenomena (e.g., earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, sea waves, landslides) or human-made causes (e.g., explosions, machinery, traffic, trains, construction equipment). Vibration sources may be continuous, such as factory machinery, or transient, such as explosions. As is the case with airborne sound, ground-borne vibrations may be described by amplitude and frequency. Additionally, in contrast to airborne noise, ground-borne vibration outdoors is not a common environmental problem and annoyance from ground-borne vibration is almost exclusively an indoor phenomenon (7). Therefore, the effects of vibrations should only be evaluated at a structure and the effects of the building structure on the vibration should be considered. Wood-frame buildings, such as typical residential structures, are more easily excited by ground vibration than heavier buildings. In contrast, large masonry buildings with spread footings have a low response to ground vibration (7). In general, the heavier a building is, the lower the response will be to the incident vibration energy. However, all structures reduce vibration levels due to the coupling of the building to the soil. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Just Perceptible Barely Perceptible Readily Perceptible Twice as Loud Noise Level Increase (dBA) Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 15 There are several different methods that are used to quantify vibration. The peak particle velocity (PPV) is defined as the maximum instantaneous peak of the vibration signal (7). The PPV is most frequently used to describe vibration impacts to buildings but is not always suitable for evaluating human response (annoyance) because it takes some time for the human body to respond to vibration signals. Instead, the human body responds to average vibration amplitude often described as the root mean square (RMS). The RMS amplitude is defined as the average of the squared amplitude of the signal and is most frequently used to describe the effect of vibration on the human body (7). However, the RMS amplitude and PPV are related mathematically, and the RMS amplitude of equipment is typically calculated from the PPV reference level. The RMS amplitude is approximately 70% of the PPV (8). Thus, either can be used on the description of vibration impacts. While not universally accepted, vibration decibel notation (VdB) is another vibration notation developed and used by the FTA in their guidance manual to describe vibration levels and provide a background of common vibration levels and set vibration limits (9). Decibel notation (VdB) serves to reduce the range of numbers used to describe vibration levels and is used in this report to describe vibration levels. As stated in the FTA guidance manual, the background vibration-velocity level in residential areas is generally 50 VdB. Ground-borne vibration is normally perceptible to humans at approximately 65 VdB. For most people, a vibration-velocity level of 75 VdB is the approximate dividing line between barely perceptible and distinctly perceptible levels. Typical outdoor sources of perceptible ground-borne vibration are construction equipment, steel-wheeled trains, and traffic on rough roads. If a roadway is smooth, the ground-borne vibration is rarely perceptible. The range of interest is from approximately 50 VdB, which is the typical background vibration-velocity level, to 100 VdB, which is the general threshold where minor damage can occur in fragile buildings. Exhibit 2-C illustrates common vibration sources and the human and structural response to ground-borne vibration. Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 16 EXHIBIT 2-C: TYPICAL LEVELS OF GROUND-BORNE VIBRATION Source: Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual. Human/Structural Response Threshold , minor cosmetic damage frag ile bujld ings Difficulty with tasks such as reading a VDT screen Residential annoyance infrequent events (e .g . commuter rail,) ,Aesiden ial armoyance , frequent events (e.g . rapid tr a,nsit Limi t for vibration sensitive e uipment Approx. th resho d for human percep tion of vibra tion - Velocity Level* Typical Sources (50 ft f rom source) 50 -Blasting from construction projects - Bt1 lldozers and o her heavy tracked construction equipmen t Commuter rall , upper range Rapid transit, upper range -Commuter rail , typical -Bus or trucl< over bump Rap id transit, typical --. Bus or truck, typ cal Typical background v ibra ion • RMS Vibration Velocity L,evef in VdB relati ve to 70 -6 inches /second Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 17 3 REGULATORY SETTING To limit population exposure to physically and/or psychologically damaging, as well as intrusive, noise levels, the federal government, the State of California, various county governments, and most municipalities in the state have established standards and ordinances to control noise. In most areas, automobile and truck traffic is the major source of environmental noise. Traffic activity generally produces an average sound level that remains constant with time. Air and rail traffic, and commercial and industrial activities are also major sources of noise in some areas. Federal, state, and local agencies regulate different aspects of environmental noise. Federal and state agencies generally set noise standards for mobile sources such as aircraft and motor vehicles, while regulation of stationary sources is left to local agencies. 3.1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA NOISE REQUIREMENTS The State of California regulates freeway noise, sets standards for sound transmission, provides occupational noise control criteria, identifies noise standards, and provides guidance for local land use compatibility. State law requires that each county and city adopt a General Plan that includes a Noise Element which is to be prepared per guidelines adopted by the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR). (10) The purpose of the Noise Element is to limit the exposure of the community to excessive noise levels. In addition, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that all known environmental effects of a project be analyzed, including environmental noise impacts. 3.2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE The State of California’s noise insulation standards are codified in the California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Building Standards Administrative Code, Part 2, and the California Building Code. These noise standards are applied to new construction in California for the purpose of controlling interior noise levels resulting from exterior noise sources. The regulations specify that acoustical studies must be prepared when noise-sensitive structures, such as residential buildings, schools, or hospitals, are developed near major transportation noise sources, and where such noise sources create an exterior noise level of 60 dBA CNEL or higher. Acoustical studies that accompany building plans for noise-sensitive land uses must demonstrate that the structure has been designed to limit interior noise in habitable rooms to acceptable noise levels. For new residential buildings, schools, and hospitals, the acceptable interior noise limit for new construction is 45 dBA CNEL. (11). Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 18 3.3 CITY OF FONTANA GENERAL PLAN NOISE ELEMENT To protect residents from the negative effects of noise, the City of Fontana has identified the following goals, policies, and actions in the General Plan Noise Element. (12) Goal 8: The City of Fontana protects sensitive land uses from excessive noise by diligent planning through 2035. Policies: x New sensitive land uses shall be prohibited in incompatible areas. x Noise-tolerant land uses shall be guided into areas irrevocably committed to land uses that are noise-producing, such as transportation corridors. x Where sensitive uses are to be placed along transportation routes, mitigation shall be provided to ensure compliance with state- mandated noise levels. x Noise spillover or encroachment from commercial, industrial and educational land uses shall be minimized into adjoining residential neighborhoods or noise-sensitive uses. Actions: A. The following uses shall be considered noise-sensitive and discouraged in areas in excess of 65 dBA CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level): Residential Uses; Hospitals; Rest Homes; Long Term Care Facilities; and Mental Care Facilities. B. The following uses shall be considered noise-sensitive and discouraged in areas in excess of 65 Leq(12) (Equivalent Continuous Sound Level): Schools; Libraries; Places of Worship; and Passive Recreation Uses. C. The State of California Office of Planning and Research General Plan Guidelines shall be followed with respect to acoustical study requirements. Goal 9: The City of Fontana provides a diverse and efficiently operated ground transportation system that generates the minimum feasible noise on its residents through 2035. Policies x All noise sections of the State Motor Vehicle Code shall be enforced. x Roads shall be maintained such that the paving is in good condition and free of cracks, bumps, and potholes. x Noise mitigation measures shall be included in the design of new roadway projects in the city. Actions D. On-road trucking activities shall continue to be regulated in the City to ensure noise impacts are minimized, including, including the implementation of truck-routes based on traffic studies. E. Development that generates increased traffic and subsequent increases in the ambient noise level adjacent to noise-sensitive land uses shall provide appropriate mitigation measures. F. Noise mitigation practices shall be employed when designing all future streets and highways, and when improvements occur along existing highway segments. G. Explore the use of “quiet pavement” materials for street improvements. Goal 10: Fontana’s residents are protected from the negative effects of “spillover” noise. Policy x Residential land uses and areas identified as noise-sensitive shall be protected from excessive noise from non-transportation sources including industrial, commercial, and residential activities and equipment. Actions A. Projects located in commercial areas shall not exceed stationary- source noise standards at the property line of proximate residential or commercial uses. B. Industrial uses shall not exceed commercial or residential stationary source noise standards at the most proximate land uses. C. Non-transportation noise shall be considered in land use planning decisions. D. Construction shall be performed as quietly as feasible when performed in proximity to residential or other noise sensitive land uses. 3.4 OPERATIONAL NOISE STANDARDS To analyze noise impacts originating from a designated fixed location or private property such as the Maple Apartments Project, stationary-source (operational) noise such as the expected roof top air conditioning units, trash enclosure activity, and parking lot activities are typically evaluated against Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 19 standards established under a jurisdiction’s Municipal Code. The City of Fontana noise control guidelines for determining and mitigating non-transportation or stationary noise source impacts from operations in neighboring residential areas are found in the Zoning and Development Code (Section 30-469), provided in Appendix 3.1. For residential zoning districts, Section 30-469 indicates that no person shall create or cause to be created any sound which exceeds the noise levels in this section as measured at the property line of any residentially zoned property. The performance standards found in Section 30-469 limit the exterior noise level to 65 dBA Leq during the daytime and nighttime hours at sensitive receiver locations as shown in Table 3-1. (13) TABLE 3-1: OPERATIONAL NOISE STANDARDS Jurisdiction Land Use Noise Level Standards (dBA Leq)1 Daytime Nighttime City of Fontana1 Residential 65 65 1 Source: Section 30-469 of the City of Fontana Development Code (Appendix 3.1). 2 Leq represents a steady state sound level containing the same total energy as a time-varying signal over a given sample period. "Daytime" = 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.; "Nighttime" = 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. 3.5 CONSTRUCTION NOISE STANDARDS The City of Fontana has set restrictions to control noise impacts associated with the construction of the Project. According to Section 18-63(b)(7), Construction or repairing of buildings or structures, construction activity is limited: between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on weekdays and between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays except in the case of urgent necessity. (14) Project construction noise levels are, therefore, considered exempt from municipal regulation if activities occur within the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekdays and between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, as specified in the City of Fontana Municipal Code, Section 18-63(7). However, if activity occurs outside of these hours, the City of Fontana stationary-source (operational) noise level standards of 65 dBA Leq during the daytime and nighttime hours shall apply as previously discussed in Section 3.4. Neither the City of Fontana General Plan and Municipal Codes establish numeric maximum acceptable construction source noise levels at potentially affected receivers, which would allow for a quantified determination of what CEQA constitutes a substantial temporary or periodic noise increase. Therefore, a numerical construction threshold based on Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual is used for analysis of daytime construction impacts, as discussed below. According to the FTA, local noise ordinances are typically not very useful in evaluating construction noise. They usually relate to nuisance and hours of allowed activity, and sometimes specify limits in terms of maximum levels, but are generally not practical for assessing the impact of a construction project. Project construction noise criteria should account for the existing noise environment, the absolute noise levels during construction activities, the duration of the construction, and the adjacent land use. Due to the lack of standardized construction noise thresholds, the FTA provides guidelines that can be considered reasonable criteria for construction noise assessment. The FTA considers a daytime exterior construction noise level of 80 dBA Leq as a reasonable threshold for noise sensitive residential land use. (15 p. 179) Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 20 TABLE 3-2: CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVEL STANDARDS Jurisdiction Permitted Hours of Construction Activity1 Acceptable Construction Noise Level Threshold2 City of Fontana 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Weekdays 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays 80 dBA Lmax 1 Source: City of Fontana Municipal Code, Section 18-83 (b)(7). 2 Threshold based on the FTA Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual. 3.6 CONSTRUCTION VIBRATION STANDARDS Construction activity can result in varying degrees of ground-borne vibration, depending on the equipment and methods used, distance to the affected structures and soil type. Construction vibration is generally associated with pile driving and rock blasting. Other construction equipment such as air compressors, light trucks, hydraulic loaders, etc., generates little or no ground vibration. (16) To analyze vibration impacts originating from the operation and construction of the Project vibration-generating activities are appropriately evaluated against standards established under a City’s Municipal Code if such standards exist. However, the City of Fontana does not identify specific vibration level limits. Therefore, for analysis purposes, the Caltrans Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual standards are used in this noise study to assess potential temporary construction-related impacts at adjacent building locations. (8 p. 38) The existing buildings adjacent to the Project site can best be described as “older residential structures” with a maximum acceptable continuous vibration threshold of 0.3 PPV (in/sec). Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 21 4 SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA The following significance criteria are based on currently adopted guidance provided by Appendix G of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. (17) For the purposes of this report, impacts would be potentially significant if the Project results in or causes: A. Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? B. Generation of excessive ground-borne vibration or ground-borne noise levels? C. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? 4.1 NOISE LEVEL INCREASES (THRESHOLD A) Noise level increases resulting from the Project are evaluated based on the Appendix G CEQA Guidelines described above at the closest sensitive receiver locations. Under CEQA, consideration must be given to the magnitude of the increase, the existing baseline ambient noise levels, and the location of noise- sensitive receivers to determine if a noise increase represents a significant adverse environmental impact. This approach recognizes that there is no single noise increase that renders the noise impact significant. (18) This is primarily because of the wide variation in individual thresholds of annoyance and differing individual experiences with noise. Thus, an important way of determining a person’s subjective reaction to a new noise is the comparison of it to the existing environment to which one has adapted—the so- called ambient environment. In general, the more a new noise exceeds the previously existing ambient noise level, the less acceptable the new noise will typically be judged. The Federal Interagency Committee on Noise (FICON) (19) developed guidance to be used for the assessment of project-generated increases in noise levels that consider the ambient noise level. The FICON recommendations are based on studies that relate aircraft noise levels to the percentage of persons highly annoyed by aircraft noise. Although the FICON recommendations were specifically developed to assess aircraft noise impacts, these recommendations are often used in environmental noise impact assessments involving the use of cumulative noise exposure metrics, such as the average-daily noise level (CNEL) and equivalent continuous noise level (Leq). The FICON guidance provides an established source of criteria to assess the impacts of substantial temporary or permanent increases in baseline ambient noise levels. Based on the FICON criteria, the amount to which a given noise level increase is considered acceptable is reduced when the without Project (baseline) noise levels are already shown to exceed certain land-use specific exterior noise level criteria. The specific levels are based on typical responses to noise level increases of 5 dBA or readily perceptible, 3 dBA or barely perceptible, and 1.5 dBA depending on the underlying without Project noise levels for noise-sensitive uses. These levels of increase and their perceived acceptance are consistent with guidance provided by both the Federal Highway Administration (7) and Caltrans (20 p. 2_48). 4.2 VIBRATION (THRESHOLD B) The City of Fontana Municipal Code does not establish the maximum acceptable vibration levels that can be generated by stationary/area vibration sources at residential land uses; therefore, a vibration threshold Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 22 from Caltrans is used. Project construction-source and/or stationary/area-source vibration that would cause or result in vibration levels exceeding 0.30 PPV (in/sec) would potentially expose persons to vibration levels in excess of the quantified standards established. They would, therefore, be potentially significant. 4.3 CEQA GUIDELINES NOT FURTHER ANALYZED (THRESHOLD C) The Project site is not located within two miles of an airport or airstrip. The nearest airport is the San Bernardino International Airport which is approximately 9 miles southeast of the Project. Thus, the Project would not be exposed to excessive noise levels from airport operations, and therefore, impacts are considered less than significant, and no further noise analysis is conducted in relation to Threshold C. 4.4 SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA SUMMARY Table 4-1 shows the significance criteria summary matrix that includes the allowable criteria used to identify potentially significant incremental noise level increases. Noise impacts shall be considered significant if any of the following occur as a direct result of the proposed development. TABLE 4-1: SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA SUMMARY Analysis Condition(s) Significance Criteria Daytime Nighttime On-Site Traffic1 Exterior Noise Compatibility Criteria 65 dBA CNEL Interior Noise Level Standard 45 dBA CNEL Off Site Traffic If ambient is < 60 dBA Leq3 ш 5 dBA Leq Project increase If ambient is 60 - 65 dBA Leq3 ш 3 dBA Leq Project increase If ambient is > 65 dBA Leq3 ш 1.5 dBA Leq Project increase Operational Exterior Noise Level Standards2 65 dBA Leq If ambient is < 60 dBA Leq3 ш 5 dBA Leq Project increase If ambient is 60 - 65 dBA Leq3 ш 3 dBA Leq Project increase If ambient is > 65 dBA Leq3 ш 1.5 dBA Leq Project increase Construction Noise Level Threshold3 80 dBA Leq 65 dBA Leq Vibration Level Threshold4 0.30 PPV (in/sec) 1 Based on Section 30-469 of the City of Fontana Development Code. 2 Based on Sections 18-63(7) and 30-469 of the City of Fontana Municipal Code. 3 FICON, 1992, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual. 4 Federal Transit Authority, Noise and Vibration Manual, 2018. "Daytime" = 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.; "Nighttime" = 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. I I Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 23 5 EXISTING NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS To assess the existing noise level environment, 24-hour noise level measurements were collected by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on Tuesday, May 14th, 2024, at six locations in the Project study area. The receiver locations were selected to describe and document the existing noise environment within the Project study area. Exhibit 5-A shows the Project site and the noise level measurement locations. Appendix 5.1 includes study area photos. 5.1 MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE AND CRITERIA To describe the existing noise environment, the hourly noise levels were measured during typical weekday conditions over a 24-hour period. By collecting individual hourly noise level measurements, it is possible to describe the daytime and nighttime hourly noise levels and calculate the 24-hour CNEL. The long-term noise readings were recorded using Piccolo Type 2 integrating sound level meter and data loggers. The Piccolo sound level meters were calibrated using a Larson-Davis calibrator, Model CAL 150. All noise meters were programmed in “slow” mode to record noise levels in “A” weighted form. The sound level meters and microphones were equipped with a windscreen during all measurements. All noise level measurement equipment satisfies the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standard specifications for sound level meters ANSI S1.4-2014/IEC 61672-1:2013. (21) 5.2 NOISE MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS The long-term noise level measurements were positioned as close to the nearest sensitive receiver locations as possible to assess the existing ambient hourly noise levels surrounding the Project site. Both Caltrans and the FTA recognize that it is not reasonable to collect noise level measurements that can fully represent every part of a private yard, patio, deck, or balcony normally used for human activity when estimating impacts for new development projects. This is demonstrated in the Caltrans general site location guidelines, which indicate that sites must be free of noise contamination by sources other than sources of interest. Avoid sites located near sources such as barking dogs, lawnmowers, pool pumps, and air conditioners unless it is the express intent of the analyst to measure these sources. (2) Further, FTA guidance states, that it is not necessary nor recommended that existing noise exposure be determined by measuring at every noise-sensitive location in the project area. Rather, the recommended approach is to characterize the noise environment for clusters of sites based on measurements or estimates at representative locations in the community. (16) Based on recommendations of Caltrans and the FTA, it is not necessary to collect measurements at each individual building or residence, because each receiver measurement represents a group of buildings that share acoustical equivalence. (16) In other words, the area represented by the receiver shares similar shielding, terrain, and geometric relationship to the reference noise source. Receivers represent a location of noise sensitive areas and are used to estimate the future noise level impacts. Collecting reference ambient noise level measurements at the nearby sensitive receiver locations allows for a comparison of the before and after Project noise levels and is necessary to assess potential noise impacts due to the Project’s contribution to the ambient noise levels. Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 24 EXHIBIT 5-A: NOISE MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS Site ----------------------------' J ~I ~II1JNj) LEGEND: • Measurement Locations [} Site Boundary Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 25 5.3 NOISE MEASUREMENT RESULTS The noise measurements presented below focus on the average or equivalent sound levels (Leq). The equivalent sound level (Leq) represents a steady-state sound level containing the same total energy as a time-varying signal over a given sample period. Table 5-1 identifies the hourly daytime (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) and nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) noise levels at each noise level measurement location. Appendix 5.2 provides a summary of the existing hourly ambient noise levels. TABLE 5-1: 24-HOUR AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS Location1 Description Energy Average Noise Level (dBA Leq)2 Daytime Nighttime L1 Located north of the site near the residence at 18242 Barbee St. 56.9 48.3 L2 Located north of the site near the residence at 18270 Barbee St. 56.5 49.2 L3 Located east of the site near the residence at 495 N. Maple Ave. 60.2 55.5 L4 Located southeast of the site near the residence at 347 S. Maple Ave. 66.9 62.8 L5 Located southeast of the site near the residence at 367 N. Maple Ave. 67.8 64.0 L6 Located south of the site near the residence at 18215 Foothill Blvd 63.7 59.0 1 See Exhibit 5-A for the noise level measurement locations. 2 Energy (logarithmic) average levels. The long-term 24-hour measurement worksheets are included in Appendix 5.2. "Daytime" = 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.; "Nighttime" = 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. Table 5-1 provides the (energy average) noise levels used to describe the daytime and nighttime ambient conditions. These daytime and nighttime energy average noise levels represent the average of all hourly noise levels observed during these time periods expressed as a single number. Appendix 5.2 provides summary worksheets of the noise levels for each hour as well as the minimum, maximum, L1, L2, L5, L8, L25, L50, L90, L95, and L99 percentile noise levels observed during the daytime and nighttime periods. The background ambient noise levels in the Project study area are dominated by the transportation-related noise associated with nearby surface streets. This includes the auto and heavy truck activities on study area roadway segments near the noise level measurement locations. Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 26 This page was intentionally left blank. Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 27 6 METHODS AND PROCEDURES The following section outlines the methods and procedures used to estimate and analyze the future traffic noise environment. Consistent with the City of Fontana General Plan Policies for land use, all transportation-related noise levels are presented in terms of the 24-hour CNELs. 6.1 FHWA TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL The estimated roadway noise impacts from vehicular traffic were calculated using a computer program that replicates the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Traffic Noise Prediction Model - FHWA-RD- 77-108. (22) The FHWA Model arrives at a predicted noise level through a series of adjustments to the Reference Energy Mean Emission Level (REMEL). In California, the national REMELs are substituted with the California Vehicle Noise (Calveno) Emission Levels. (23) Adjustments are then made to the REMEL to account for: the roadway classification (e.g., collector, secondary, major or arterial), the roadway active width (i.e., the distance between the center of the outermost travel lanes on each side of the roadway), the total average daily traffic (ADT), the travel speed, the percentages of automobiles, medium trucks, and heavy trucks in the traffic volume, the roadway grade, the angle of view (e.g., whether the roadway view is blocked), the site conditions (“hard” or “soft” relates to the absorption of the ground, pavement, or landscaping), and the percentage of total ADT which flows each hour throughout a 24-hour period. 6.2 ON-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL INPUTS Based on the City of Fontana General Plan Update, Chapter 9 Community Mobility Circulation, the on-site roadway parameters including the ADT volumes used for this analysis are presented in Table 6-1. TABLE 6-1: ON-SITE ROADWAY PARAMETERS Roadway Lanes Classification1 Average Daily Traffic Volume2 Speed Limits (mph)3 Site Conditions Foothill Blvd. 4 Major Highway 34,000 45 Soft Maple Ave. 2 Collector 10,400 35 Soft 1 Road classifications based upon the City of Fontana General Plan Update, Chapter 9 Community Mobility Circulation. 2 City of Fontana General Plan Update, Chapter 9 Community Mobility Circulation. 3 Posted speed limits The traffic volumes shown in Table 6-1 reflect future long-range traffic conditions needed to assess the future on-site traffic noise environment and to identify potential mitigation measures (if any) that address the worst-case future conditions. For the purposes of this analysis, soft site conditions were used to analyze the on-site traffic noise impacts for the Project study area. Soft site conditions account for the sound propagation loss over natural surfaces such as normal earth and ground vegetation. Research conducted by Caltrans has shown that the use of soft site conditions is appropriate for the application of the FHWA traffic noise prediction model used in this analysis. (24) Table 6-2 presents the time-of-day vehicle splits by vehicle type used to develop the 24-hour CNEL and Table 6-3 presents the total traffic flow distributions (vehicle mixes) used for this analysis. The information in Tables 6-2 and 6-3 provides the hourly distribution percentages of automobiles, medium trucks, and heavy trucks for input into the FHWA Model based on roadway types. Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 28 TABLE 6-2: TIME OF DAY VEHICLE SPLITS Vehicle Type Time of Day Splits1 Total of Time of Day Splits Daytime Evening Nighttime Autos 77.50% 12.90% 9.60% 100.00% Medium Trucks 84.80% 4.90% 10.30% 100.00% Heavy Trucks 86.50% 2.70% 10.80% 100.00% 1 Typical Southern California time of day vehicle splits. "Daytime" = 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.; "Evening" = 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.; "Nighttime" = 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. TABLE 6-3: DISTRIBUTION OF TRAFFIC FLOW BY VEHICLE TYPE (VEHICLE MIX) Roadway Total % Traffic Flow Total Autos Medium Trucks Heavy Trucks Foothill Blvd. 97.00% 2.40% 0.60% 100.00% Maple Ave. 97.42% 1.84% 0.74% 100.00% Source: Caltrans Truck Traffic Counts, Traffic Census; Typical Southern California vehicle mix The site plan is used to identify the relationship between the roadway centerline elevation, the pad elevation and the centerline distance to any intervening noise barriers, and the building façade. The exterior noise level impacts were placed five feet above the pad elevation at the proposed building façade for first-floor level analysis. Second- through third-floor receivers were placed 9 feet above each floor level (i.e., 14 feet and 23 feet). 6.3 OFF-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Due to the small increase in ADT caused by the Project, the ADT volume was compared with the preexisting volume directly to determine the noise level increase. Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 29 7 ON-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS An on-site noise impact analysis has been completed to determine the traffic noise exposure and to identify potential necessary noise abatement measures for the Maple Apartments Project. It is expected that the primary source of noise impacts to the Project site will be traffic noise from Foothill Boulevard and Maple Avenue in the Project study area. 7.1 ON-SITE EXTERIOR NOISE ANALYSIS Using the FHWA traffic noise prediction model and the parameters outlined in Tables 6-1 to 6-3, the expected future exterior noise levels were calculated. Table 7-1 presents a summary of future exterior noise level impacts at the building facades of the proposed residential dwelling units consistent with the standards of the City of Fontana General Plan Noise Element. The on-site traffic noise level analysis indicates that the Project will experience exterior noise levels ranging from 62.9 to 72.7 dBA CNEL at the first-floor units. This noise analysis shows that the buildings fronting Maple Avenue will satisfy the City of Fontana noise standards for residential land uses with typical construction, with a windows-closed condition with a means of mechanical ventilation (i.e., air conditioning). The analysis also shows that the buildings fronting Foothill Boulevard will require an interior noise analysis, which may identify measures such as upgraded windows and doors with a windows-closed condition and a means of mechanical ventilation (i.e., air conditioning) in order to satisfy the City of Fontana’s exterior noise standards. All calculations are provided in Appendix 7.1. TABLE 7-1: EXTERIOR NOISE LEVELS (CNEL) Lot Roadway Type Noise Level (dBA CNEL)1 East Building #3 Maple Ave. Three-Story 63.0 East Building #4 Maple Ave. Three-Story 62.9 South Building #5 Foothill Blvd. Three-Story 72.7 South Building #6 Foothill Blvd. Three-Story 72.4 1 Exterior noise level calculations are included in Appendix 7.1. 7.2 ON-SITE INTERIOR NOISE ANALYSIS The future noise levels were calculated at the first, second, and third-floor building façades to ensure that the interior noise levels comply with the City of Fontana 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standards. 7.2.1 NOISE REDUCTION METHODOLOGY The interior noise level is the difference between the predicted exterior noise level at the building façade and the noise reduction of the structure. Typical building construction will provide a Noise Reduction (NR) of approximately 12 dBA with “windows-open” and a minimum 25 dBA noise reduction with “windows- closed.” However, sound leaks, cracks, and openings within the window assembly can greatly diminish its effectiveness in reducing noise. Several methods are used to improve interior noise reduction, including (1) weather-stripped solid core exterior doors; (2) upgraded dual-glazed windows; (3) mechanical ventilation/air conditioning; and (4) exterior wall/roof assemblies free of cut-outs or openings. Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 30 7.2.2 INTERIOR NOISE LEVEL ASSESSMENT Table 7-2 shows that the future unmitigated noise levels at the first-floor building façades are expected to range from 62.9 to 72.7 dBA CNEL. The first-floor analysis shows that the buildings along Foothill Boulevard can satisfy interior noise standards with a windows-closed condition and upgraded construction using windows and doors with a minimum STC rating of 30. The first-floor analysis also shows that the buildings along Maple Avenue will satisfy interior noise standards with a windows-closed condition using typical construction and a means of mechanical ventilation (i.e., air conditioning). TABLE 7-2: FIRST FLOOR INTERIOR NOISE IMPACTS (CNEL) Lot Noise Level at Façade1 Required Interior NR2 Estimated Interior NR3 Upgraded Windows4 Interior Noise Level5 Threshold Threshold Exceeded? East Building #3 63.0 18.0 25.0 No 38.0 45 No East Building #4 62.9 17.9 25.0 No 37.9 45 No South Building #5 72.7 27.7 25.0 Yes 47.7 45 Yes South Building #6 72.4 27.4 25.0 Yes 47.4 45 Yes 1 Exterior noise level at the facade with a windows closed condition requiring a means of mechanical ventilation (e.g., air conditioning). 2 Noise reduction required to satisfy the 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standards. 3 A minimum 12 dBA of interior noise reduction is assumed with standard building construction and a windows closed condition. 4 Does the required interior noise reduction trigger upgraded with a minimum STC rating of greater than 27? 5 Estimated interior noise level with minimum STC rating for all windows. "NR" = Noise reduction Table 7-3 shows that the future unmitigated noise levels at the second-floor building façades will range from 62.8 to 72.4 dBA CNEL. The second-floor analysis also shows that the buildings along Foothill Boulevard can satisfy interior noise level standards with a windows-closed condition and upgraded construction using windows with a minimum STC rating of 30. The second-floor analysis also shows that the buildings along Maple Avenue will satisfy interior noise standards with a windows-closed condition using typical construction and a means of mechanical ventilation (i.e., air conditioning). TABLE 7-3: SECOND FLOOR INTERIOR NOISE IMPACTS (CNEL) Lot Noise Level at Façade1 Required Interior NR2 Calculated Interior NR3 Upgraded Windows4 Interior Noise Level5 Threshold Threshold Exceeded? East Building #3 62.9 17.9 25.0 No 37.9 45 No East Building #4 62.8 17.8 25.0 No 37.8 45 No South Building #5 72.4 27.4 25.0 Yes 47.4 45 Yes South Building #6 72.1 27.1 25.0 Yes 47.1 45 Yes 1 Exterior noise level at the facade with a windows closed condition requiring a means of mechanical ventilation (e.g., air conditioning). 2 Noise reduction required to satisfy the 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standards. 3 A minimum 25 dBA of interior noise reduction is assumed with standard building construction and a windows closed condition. 4 Does the required interior noise reduction trigger upgraded with a minimum STC rating of 27? 5 Estimated interior noise level with minimum STC rating for all windows. "NR" = Noise reduction Table 7-4 shows that the future unmitigated noise levels at the third-floor building façades will range from 62.5 to 71.9 dBA CNEL. The third-floor analysis also shows that the buildings along Foothill Boulevard will satisfy interior noise standards with a windows-closed condition and upgraded construction using Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 31 windows with a minimum STC rating of 29. The third-floor analysis also shows that the buildings along Maple Avenue will satisfy interior noise standards with a windows-closed condition using typical construction and a means of mechanical ventilation (i.e., air conditioning). TABLE 7-4: THIRD FLOOR INTERIOR NOISE IMPACTS (CNEL) Lot Noise Level at Façade1 Required Interior NR2 Calculated Interior NR3 Upgraded Windows4 Interior Noise Level5 Threshold Threshold Exceeded? East Building #3 62.6 17.6 25.0 No 37.6 45 No East Building #4 62.5 17.5 25.0 No 37.5 45 No South Building #5 71.9 26.9 25.0 Yes 46.9 45 Yes South Building #6 71.6 26.6 25.0 Yes 46.6 45 Yes 1 Exterior noise level at the facade with a windows closed condition requiring a means of mechanical ventilation (e.g., air conditioning). 2 Noise reduction required to satisfy the 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standards. 3 A minimum 25 dBA of interior noise reduction is assumed with standard building construction and a windows closed condition. 4 Does the required interior noise reduction trigger upgraded with a minimum STC rating of 27? 5 Estimated interior noise level with minimum STC rating for all windows. "NR" = Noise reduction Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 32 This page was intentionally left blank. Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 33 8 OFF-SITE TRANSPORTATION NOISE IMPACTS The expected Project is anticipated to generate a maximum of 1,786 daily trips as found by the Project Trips Report conducted by Translutions, Inc. (25) Comparatively, based on City published traffic counts, existing traffic volumes on Foothill Boulevard averaged 21,200 vehicles a day (26). This traffic volume would represent an incremental increase to the existing roadway volumes. Therefore, the Project would generate a less than 1 CNEL increase in off-site traffic noise. This would not be a perceptible noise level increase (i.e., less than 3 dBA CNEL) at nearby sensitive land uses adjacent to study area roadways. Due to the low traffic volumes generated by the Project, the off-site traffic noise levels generated by the Project are considered less than significant, and no further analysis is required. Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 34 This page was intentionally left blank. Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 35 9 RECEIVER LOCATIONS To assess the potential for long-term operational and short-term construction noise impacts, the following sensitive receiver locations, as shown on Exhibit 9-A, were identified as representative locations for analysis. Sensitive receivers are generally defined as locations where people reside or where the presence of unwanted sound could otherwise adversely affect the use of the land. Noise-sensitive land uses are generally considered to include schools, hospitals, single-family dwellings, mobile home parks, churches, libraries, and recreation areas. Moderately noise-sensitive land uses typically include multi-family dwellings, hotels, motels, dormitories, outpatient clinics, cemeteries, golf courses, country clubs, athletic/tennis clubs, and equestrian clubs. Land uses that are considered relatively insensitive to noise include business, commercial, and professional developments. Land uses that are typically not affected by noise include: industrial, manufacturing, utilities, agriculture, undeveloped land, parking lots, warehousing, liquid and solid waste facilities, salvage yards, and transit terminals. To describe the potential off-site Project noise levels, six receiver locations in the vicinity of the Project site were identified. All distances are measured from the Project site boundary to the outdoor living areas (e.g., private backyards) or at the building façade, whichever is closer to the Project site. The selection of receiver locations is based on FHWA guidelines and is consistent with additional guidance provided by Caltrans and the FTA, as previously described in Section 5.2. Other sensitive land uses in the Project study area that are located at greater distances than those identified in this noise study will experience lower noise levels than those presented in this report due to the additional attenuation from distance and the shielding of intervening structures. Distance is measured in a straight line from the project boundary to each receiver location. R1: Location R1 represents the existing noise-sensitive residence at 18242 Barbee Street, approximately 103 feet north of the Project site. Receiver R1 is placed in the private outdoor living areas (backyards) facing the Project site. A 24-hour noise measurement was taken near this location, L1, to describe the existing ambient noise environment. R2: Location R2 represents the existing noise-sensitive residence at 18270 Barbee Street, approximately 107 feet north of the Project site. Receiver R2 is placed in the private outdoor living areas (backyards) facing the Project site. A 24-hour noise measurement was taken near this location, L2, to describe the existing ambient noise environment. R3: Location R3 represents the existing noise-sensitive residence at 495 North Maple Avenue, approximately 84 feet east of the Project site. Receiver R3 is placed at the façade of the apartment complex facing the site. A 24-hour noise measurement was taken near this location, L3, to describe the existing ambient noise environment. R4: Location R4 represents the existing noise-sensitive residence at 347 South Maple Avenue, approximately 328 feet southeast of the Project site. Receiver R4 is placed at the façade of the apartment complex facing the Project site. A 24-hour noise measurement was taken near this location, L4, to describe the existing ambient noise environment. R5: Location R5 represents the existing noise-sensitive residence at 367 North Maple Avenue, approximately 343 feet southeast of the Project site. Receiver R5 is placed in the private outdoor living areas (backyards) facing the Project site. A 24-hour noise measurement was taken near this location, L5, to describe the existing ambient noise environment. R6: Location R6 represents the existing noise-sensitive residence at 18215 Foothill Boulevard, 127 feet south of the Project site. Receiver R6 is placed at the façade of the apartment Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 36 complex facing the Project site. A 24-hour noise measurement was taken near this location, L6, to describe the existing ambient noise environment. EXHIBIT 9-A: RECEIVER LOCATIONS "l"l'@:iJIJfilW -----------~--------------_.------------~ Site #~ ~ ----------------------------~ - LEGEND: [] Site Boundary ~ Receiver Locations -• Distance from receiver to Project site boundary (in feet) Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 37 10 OPERATIONAL NOISE ANALYSIS This section analyzes the potential stationary-source operational noise impacts at the nearest receiver locations, identified in Section 9, resulting from the operation of the Project. Exhibit 10-A identifies the noise source locations used to assess the Project-related operational noise levels. 10.1 OPERATIONAL NOISE SOURCES The proposed residential land uses are considered noise-sensitive receiving land uses and are not expected to include any specific type of operational noise sources beyond the typical noise sources associated with existing residential land uses in the Project study area. The on-site Project-related noise sources are expected to include: roof top air conditioning units, trash enclosure activity, and parking lot activities. ROOF TOP AIR CONDITIONING UNIT To assess the noise levels created by the roof-top and ground-mounted air conditioning units, reference noise levels were taken from equipment specifications for a 3- to 5-ton residential packaged air conditioning unit (Carrier 50VR-A). The manufacturer’s specifications are included in Appendix 10.1. At a uniform reference distance of 50 feet, the units would generate a reference noise level of 44.4 dBA Leq. The air conditioning units were modeled 3 feet above the roof level, operating 45 minutes per hour during the daytime and 30 minutes at nighttime, which represents the typical maximum operating time for properly-sized AC systems. TRASH ENCLOSURE ACTIVITY To describe the noise levels associated with trash enclosure activity, Urban Crossroads collected a reference noise level measurement at an existing trash enclosure containing two dumpster bins. The trash enclosure noise levels describe metal gates opening and closing, metal scraping against concrete floor sounds, dumpster movement on metal wheels, and trash dropping into the metal dumpster. The reference noise levels describe trash enclosure noise activities when trash is dropped into an empty metal dumpster, as would occur at the Project site. The measured reference noise level at the uniform 50-foot reference distance is 57.3 dBA Leq for the trash enclosure activity. The reference noise level describes the expected noise source activities associated with the trash enclosures for each of the Project buildings. Typical trash enclosure activities are estimated to occur for 10 minutes per hour. PARKING LOT ACTIVITIES Parking lot activities are based on the area of the parking spaces. The Project includes approximately 373 new parking spaces, which are assumed to have up to 2 movements per hour for a total of 746 events in an hour. Based on studies conducted in Europe and Australia, the average parking procedure, which included movement associated with either entering or exiting the parking area, parking the vehicles, and opening and closing doors, resulted in a sound power level of approximately 63 dBA Lw/square meter per event (27) (28) Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 38 EXHIBIT 10-A: OPERATIONAL NOISE SOURCE LOCATIONS liHDG.fffi LEGEND: □ Roof-Top Air Condition ing Unit ♦ Trash Enclosure Activity ~ Pa rking Lot Vehicle Movements Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 39 10.2 REFERENCE NOISE LEVELS To estimate the operational noise impacts, reference noise level measurements were collected from similar types of activities to represent the noise levels expected with the development of the Project. While sound pressure levels (e.g., Leq) quantify in decibels the intensity of given sound sources at a reference distance, sound power levels (Lw) are connected to the sound source and are independent of distance. Sound pressure levels vary substantially with distance from the source and diminish because of intervening obstacles and barriers, air absorption, wind, and other factors. Sound power is the acoustical energy emitted by the sound source and is an absolute value that is not affected by the environment. The reference Project operational noise levels are based on the Project-related noise sources shown in Exhibit 10-A and summarized in Table 10-1. TABLE 10-1: REFERENCE NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS Noise Source Noise Source Height (Feet) Min./Hour2 Reference Noise Level (dBA Leq) @ 50 Feet Sound Power Level (dBA)3 Day Night Roof-top Air Conditioning Unit1 3' 45 30 44.4 76.0 Trash Enclosure Activity1 8' 10 10 57.3 88.9 Parking Lot Activities 3' 60 30 41.8 73.4 1 As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. 2 Anticipated duration (minutes within the hour) of noise activity during typical hourly conditions expected at the Project site. "Daytime" = 7:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m.; "Nighttime" = 10:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. 3 Sound power level represents the total amount of acoustical energy (noise level) produced by a sound source independent of distance or surroundings. Sound power levels calculated using the CadnaA noise model at the reference distance to the noise source. Numbers may vary due to size differences between point and area noise sources. 10.3 CADNAA NOISE PREDICTION MODEL To fully describe the exterior operational noise levels from the Project, Urban Crossroads, Inc. developed a noise prediction model using the CadnaA (Computer Aided Noise Abatement) computer program. CadnaA can analyze multiple types of noise sources using the spatially accurate Project site plan, georeferenced Nearmap aerial imagery, topography, buildings, and barriers in its calculations to predict outdoor noise levels. Using the ISO 9613 protocol, CadnaA will calculate the distance from each noise source to the noise receiver locations, using the ground absorption, distance, and barrier/building attenuation inputs to provide a summary of the noise level at each receiver and the partial noise level contributions by noise source. Consistent with the ISO 9613 protocol, the CadnaA noise prediction model relies on the reference sound power level (Lw) to describe individual noise sources. While sound pressure levels (e.g., Leq) quantify in decibels the intensity of given sound sources at a reference distance, sound power levels (Lw) are connected to the sound source and are independent of distance. Sound pressure levels vary substantially with distance from the source and diminish because of intervening obstacles and barriers, air absorption, wind, and other factors. Sound power is the acoustical energy emitted by the sound source and is an absolute value that is not affected by the environment. The operational noise level calculations provided in this noise study account for the distance attenuation provided due to geometric spreading, when sound from a localized stationary source (i.e., a point source) Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 40 propagates uniformly outward in a spherical pattern. A default ground attenuation factor of 0.5 was used in the noise analysis to account for semi-hard ground surfaces. 10.4 PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVELS Using the reference noise levels to represent the Project operations that include roof top air conditioning units, trash enclosure activity, and parking lot activities, Urban Crossroads, Inc. calculated the operational source noise levels that are expected to be generated at the Project site and the Project-related noise level increases that would be experienced at each of the sensitive receiver locations. Table 10-2 shows the Project operational noise levels during the daytime hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. The daytime hourly noise levels at the off-site receiver locations are expected to range from 37.0 to 50.1 dBA L eq. TABLE 10-2: DAYTIME PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVELS Noise Source1 Operational Noise Levels by Receiver Location (dBA Leq) R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 Roof-top Air Conditioning Unit 41.0 41.2 39.2 36.9 36.7 40.6 Trash Enclosure Activity 37.4 44.8 41.8 18.7 16.0 17.7 Parking Lot Activities 48.8 47.7 40.4 24.5 24.5 41.1 Total (All Noise Sources) 49.7 50.1 45.4 37.2 37.0 43.9 1 See Exhibit 10-A for the noise source locations. CadnaA noise model calculations are included in Appendix 10.2. Table 10-3 shows the Project operational noise levels during the nighttime hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. The nighttime hourly noise levels at the off-site receiver locations are expected to range from 34.5 to 49.5 dBA Leq. Appendix 10.2 includes the detailed noise model inputs used to estimate the Project operational noise levels. TABLE 10-3: NIGHTTIME PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVELS Noise Source Operational Noise Levels by Receiver Location (dBA Leq) R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 Roof-top Air Conditioning Unit 38.2 38.5 36.5 34.2 34.0 37.9 Trash Enclosure Activity 36.5 43.8 40.9 17.7 15.0 16.7 Parking Lot Activities 48.8 47.7 40.4 24.5 24.5 41.1 Total (All Noise Sources) 49.4 49.5 44.4 34.7 34.5 42.8 1 See Exhibit 10-A for the noise source locations. CadnaA noise model calculations are included in Appendix 10.1. 10.5 PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL COMPLIANCE To demonstrate compliance with local noise regulations, the Project-only operational noise levels are evaluated against exterior noise level thresholds based on the City of Fontana exterior noise level standards at nearby noise-sensitive receiver locations. Table 10-4 shows the Project operational noise levels associated with the Project will satisfy the City of Fontana 65 dBA Leq daytime and 65 dBA Leq Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 41 nighttime exterior noise level standards at the nearest receiver locations. Therefore, the operational noise impacts are considered less than significant at the nearby noise-sensitive receiver locations. TABLE 10-4: OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL COMPLIANCE Receiver Location1 Project Operational Noise Levels (dBA Leq)2 Noise Level Standards (dBA Leq)3 Noise Level Standards Exceeded?4 Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime R1 49.7 49.4 65 65 No No R2 50.1 49.5 65 65 No No R3 45.4 44.4 65 65 No No R4 37.2 34.7 65 65 No No R5 37.0 34.5 65 65 No No R6 43.9 42.8 65 65 No No 1 See Exhibit 9-A for the receiver locations. 2 Proposed Project operational noise levels as shown in Table 10-1 and 10-2. 3 City of Fontana Development Code, 30-469 (Appendix 3.1) 4 Do the estimated Project operational noise source activities exceed the noise level standards? "Daytime" = 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.; "Nighttime" = 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. 10.6 PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL INCREASES To describe the Project operational noise level increases, the Project operational noise levels are combined with the existing ambient noise levels measurements for the nearby receiver locations potentially impacted by Project operational noise sources. Since the units used to measure noise, decibels (dB), are logarithmic units, the Project-operational and existing ambient noise levels cannot be combined using standard arithmetic equations. (2) Instead, they must be logarithmically added using the following base equation: SPLTotal = 10log10[10SPL1/10 + 10SPL2/10 + … 10SPLn/10] Where “SPL1,” “SPL2,” etc. are equal to the sound pressure levels being combined, or in this case, the Project-operational and existing ambient noise levels. The difference between the combined Project and ambient noise levels describes the Project noise level increases to the existing ambient noise environment. As indicated in Table 10-5, the Project will generate an unmitigated daytime operational noise level increase up to 0.9 dBA Leq at the nearest receiver locations. Table 10-6 shows that the Project will generate an unmitigated nighttime operational noise level increase up to 3.6 dBA Leq at the nearest receiver locations. As indicated in Tables 10-5 and 10-6, the Project-related operational noise level increases will satisfy the noise level increase significance criteria presented in Table 4-1. Therefore, the incremental Project operational noise level increases are considered less than significant at all receiver locations. Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 42 TABLE 10-5: DAYTIME PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL INCREASES Receiver Location1 Total Project Operational Noise Level2 Measurement Location3 Reference Ambient Noise Levels4 Combined Project and Ambient5 Project Increase6 Increase Criteria Increase Criteria Exceeded? R1 49.7 L1 56.9 57.7 0.8 5.0 No R2 50.1 L2 56.5 57.4 0.9 5.0 No R3 45.4 L3 60.2 60.3 0.1 3.0 No R4 37.2 L4 66.9 66.9 0.0 1.5 No R5 37.0 L5 67.8 67.8 0.0 1.5 No R6 43.9 L6 63.7 63.7 0.0 3.0 No 1 See Exhibit 9-A for the receiver locations. 2 Total Project daytime operational noise levels as shown in Table 10-1. 3 Reference noise level measurement locations as shown on Exhibit 5-A. 4 Observed daytime ambient noise levels as shown in Table 5-1. 5 Represents the combined ambient conditions plus the Project activities. 6 The noise level increase expected with the addition of the proposed Project activities. TABLE 10-6: NIGHTTIME OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL INCREASES Receiver Location1 Total Project Operational Noise Level2 Measurement Location3 Reference Ambient Noise Levels4 Combined Project and Ambient5 Project Increase6 Increase Criteria Increase Criteria Exceeded? R1 49.4 L1 48.3 51.9 3.6 5.0 No R2 49.5 L2 49.2 52.4 3.2 5.0 No R3 44.4 L3 55.5 55.8 0.3 5.0 No R4 34.7 L4 62.8 62.8 0.0 3.0 No R5 34.5 L5 64.0 64.0 0.0 3.0 No R6 42.8 L6 59.0 59.1 0.1 5.0 No 1 See Exhibit 9-A for the receiver locations. 2 Total Project nighttime operational noise levels as shown in Table 10-2. 3 Reference noise level measurement locations as shown on Exhibit 5-A. 4 Observed nighttime ambient noise levels as shown in Table 5-1. 5 Represents the combined ambient conditions plus the Project activities. 6 The noise level increase expected with the addition of the proposed Project activities. Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 43 11 CONSTRUCTION ANALYSIS This section analyzes potential impacts resulting from the short-term construction activities associated with the development of the Project. Exhibit 11-A, shows the boundary for typical construction in relation to the nearby sensitive receiver locations previously described in Section 6. City of Fontana Municipal Code Section 18-63(7), states that project construction noise levels are considered exempt between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on weekdays and between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays. If Project construction activity occurs outside of the hours specified in the Municipal Code, noise levels shall satisfy the City of Fontana construction noise level thresholds of 65 dBA Leq during the daytime and nighttime hours. 11.1 TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVELS Noise generated by the Project construction equipment will typically include a combination of trucks, power tools, concrete mixers, and portable generators that, when combined, can reach high levels. The number and mix of construction equipment are expected to occur in the following stages: x Site Preparation x Grading x Building Construction x Paving x Architectural Coating 11.2 TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION REFERENCE NOISE LEVELS To describe peak construction noise activities, this construction noise analysis was prepared using reference noise level measurements published in the Road Construction Noise Model (RCNM) by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) (29). The FHWA model provides a comprehensive source of reference construction noise levels. Table 11-1 provides a summary of the RCNM construction reference noise level measurements expressed in hourly average dBA Leq using the estimated RCNM usage factors (29) to describe the construction activities for each stage of Project construction. Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 44 EXHIBIT 11-A: CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND RECEIVER LOCATIONS LEGEND: ~ Construction Activity ~ Receiver Locations -• Distance from receiver to construction activity (in feet) Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 45 TABLE 11-1: TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION REFERENCE NOISE LEVELS Construction Stage Reference Construction Equipment1 Reference Noise Level @ 50 Feet (dBA Leq) Composite Reference Noise Level (dBA Leq) Reference Power Level (dBA Lw) Site Preparation Dozer 78.0 83.4 115.1 Front End Loader 75.0 Grader 81.0 Grading Excavator 77.0 84.0 115.6 Tractor 80.0 Scraper 80.0 Building Construction Crane 73.0 77.4 109.1 Backhoe 74.0 Generator (<25kVA) 70.0 Paving Paver 74.0 77.8 109.5 Dump Truck 72.0 Roller 73.0 Architectural Coating Man Lift 68.0 76.2 107.8 Compressor (air) 74.0 Generator (<25kVA) 70.0 1 FHWA Road Construction Noise Model. 11.3 TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION NOISE ANALYSIS Table 11-1 shows the Project construction equipment reference noise levels used in this analysis and the resulting Project-related construction noise levels at each receiver location when the highest reference noise level is operating at a single point nearest each sensitive receiver location. Table 11-2 shows that the Project-related construction noise levels will range from 58.0 to 64.3 dBA Leq at the sensitive receiver locations in the study area. TABLE 11-2: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT NOISE LEVEL SUMMARY Receiver Location1 Construction Noise Levels (dBA Leq) Site Preparation Grading Building Construction Paving Architectural Coating Highest Levels2 R1 63.8 64.3 57.7 58.2 56.5 64.3 R2 63.7 64.2 57.6 58.1 56.4 64.2 R3 63.6 64.1 57.5 58.0 56.3 64.1 R4 57.7 58.2 51.6 52.1 50.4 58.2 R5 57.5 58.0 51.4 51.9 50.2 58.0 R6 62.7 63.2 56.6 57.1 55.4 63.2 1 Construction noise source and receiver locations are shown on Exhibit 11-A. 2 Construction noise level calculations based on distance from the project site boundaries (construction activity area) to nearby receiver locations. CadnaA construction noise model inputs are included in Appendix 11.1. Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 46 11.4 TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVEL COMPLIANCE To evaluate whether the Project will generate potentially significant short-term noise levels at nearest residential receiver locations, a construction-related daytime noise level threshold of 80 dBA Leq is used as a reasonable threshold to assess the daytime construction noise level impacts. The construction noise analysis shows that the nearest residential receiver locations will satisfy the daytime 80 dBA Leq significance threshold during Project construction activities as shown in Table 11-3. Therefore, the noise impacts due to Project construction noise are considered less than significant. TABLE 11-3: TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVEL COMPLIANCE Receiver Location1 Construction Noise Levels (dBA Leq) Highest Construction Noise Levels2 Threshold3 Threshold Exceeded?4 R1 64.3 80 No R2 64.2 80 No R3 64.1 80 No R4 58.2 80 No R5 58.0 80 No R6 63.2 80 No 1 Noise receiver locations are shown on Exhibit 11-A. 2 Highest construction noise level operating at the Project site boundary to nearby receiver locations (Table 11-2). 3 Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual. 4 Do the estimated Project construction noise levels exceed the construction noise level threshold? 11.5 CONSTRUCTION VIBRATION ANALYSIS Construction activity can result in varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the equipment and methods employed. The operation of construction equipment causes ground vibrations that spread through the ground and diminish in strength with distance. Ground vibration levels associated with various types of construction equipment are summarized in Table 11-4. Based on the representative vibration levels presented for various construction equipment types, it is possible to estimate the potential for building damage using the following vibration assessment methods defined by Caltrans. To describe the vibration impacts, Caltrans provides the following equation: PPV equip = PPVref x (25/D)1.5. TABLE 11-4: VIBRATION SOURCE LEVELS FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT Equipment PPV (in/sec) at 25 feet Small bulldozer 0.003 Jackhammer 0.035 Loaded trucks 0.076 Large bulldozer 0.089 Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 47 Table 11-5 presents the expected Project-related vibration levels at the nearest receiver locations. At distances ranging from 84 to 343 feet from Project construction activities, construction vibration velocity levels are estimated to range up to 0.01 PPV (in/sec). Based on the maximum acceptable continuous vibration threshold of 0.30 PPV (in/sec) for older residential buildings, the typical Project construction vibration levels will satisfy the building damage thresholds at all receiver locations TABLE 11-5: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT VIBRATION LEVELS Receiver Location1 Distance to Const. Activity (Feet)2 Typical Construction Vibration Levels PPV (in/sec)3 Thresholds PPV (in/sec)4 Thresholds Exceeded?5 Small bulldozer Jack- hammer Loaded Trucks Large Bulldozer Highest Vibration Level R1 103' 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.30 No R2 107' 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.30 No R3 84' 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.30 No R4 328' 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 No R5 343' 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 No R6 127' 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.30 No 1 Construction receiver locations are shown on Exhibit 11-A. 2 Distance from receiver location to Project construction boundary. 3 Based on the Vibration Source Levels of Construction Equipment (Table 11-4). 4 City of Redlands Municipal Code Section 8.06.020 5 Does the peak vibration exceed the acceptable vibration thresholds? "PPV" = Peak Particle Velocity Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 48 This page was intentionally left blank. Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 49 12 REFERENCES 1. State of California. California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G. 2018. 2. California Department of Transportation Environmental Program. Technical Noise Supplement - A Technical Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol. Sacramento, CA : s.n., September 2013. 3. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Noise Abatement and Control. Information on Levels of Environmental Noise Requisite to Protect Public Health and Welfare with an Adequate Margin of Safety. March 1974. EPA/ONAC 550/9/74-004. 4. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Environment and Planning, Noise and Air Quality Branch. Highway Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement Policy and Guidance. December 2011. 5. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Highway Traffic Noise in the United States, Problem and Response. April 2000. p. 3. 6. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Noise Abatement and Control. Noise Effects Handbook-A Desk Reference to Health and Welfare Effects of Noise. October 1979 (revised July 1981). EPA 550/9/82/106. 7. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, FTA Report No. 0123. September 2018. 8. California Department of Transportation. Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual. April 2020. 9. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, FTA-VA-90-1003-06. May 2006. 10. Office of Planning and Research. State of California General Plan Guidelines. October 2017. 11. State of California. California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, Volume 1, Chapter 12, Section 1206.4, Allowable Interior Noise Level. ICC Digital Coes. [Online] 2019. https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/CABCV12019/chapter-12-interior-environment. 12. City of Fontana. General Plan Noise Element. November 2018. 13. —. Zoning and Development Code, Section 30, Article V - Residential Zoning Districts, Division 6 - Performance Standards. 14. —. Municipal Code, Chapter 18, Article II - Noise. 15. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual. September 2018. 16. —. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual. September 2018. 17. State of California. California Environmental Quality Act, Environmental Checklist Form Appendix G. 2019. 18. California Court of Appeal. Gray v. County of Madera, F053661. 167 Cal.App.4th 1099; - Cal.Rptr.3d, October 2008. 19. Federal Interagency Committee on Noise. Federal Agency Review of Selected Airport Noise Analysis Issues. August 1992. 20. California Department of Transportation. Technical Noise Supplement. November 2009. Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 50 21. American National Standards Institute (ANSI). Specification for Sound Level Meters ANSI S1.4- 2014/IEC 61672-1:2013. 22. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model. December 1978. FHWA-RD-77-108. 23. California Department of Transportation Environmental Program, Office of Environmental Engineering. Use of California Vehicle Noise Reference Energy Mean Emission Levels (Calveno REMELs) in FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction. September 1995. TAN 95-03. 24. California Department of Transportation. Traffic Noise Attenuation as a Function of Ground and Vegetation Final Report. June 1995. FHWA/CA/TL-95/23. 25. Translutions. Project Trips. 2024. 26. City of Fontana. Traffic Volume Map. Fontana : s.n., 2014. 27. Prediction of parking area noise in Australian conditions. Johnson, Laurence Nicol and Paul. Paper Number 39, s.l. : Gold Coast, Australia, 2-4 November 2011, Vol. Proceedings of ACOUSTICS 2011. 28. Bayerisches Landesamt fur Umwelt. Parking Area Noise, 6. Revised Edition. 2007. ISBN 3-936385-26- 2, ISSN 0723-0028. 29. FHWA. Roadway Construction Noise Model. January 2006. Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 51 13 CERTIFICATION The contents of this noise analysis represent an accurate depiction of the noise environment and impacts associated with the Project. The information contained in this noise analysis is based on the best available data at the time of preparation. If you have any questions, please contact me directly at (619) 788-1971. William Maddux Senior Associate URBAN CROSSROADS, INC. (619) 788-1971 bmaddux@urbanxroads.com EDUCATION Bachelor of Science in Urban and Regional Planning California Polytechnic State University, Pomona • June 2000 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS ASA – Acoustical Society of America APA – American Planning Association AWMA – Air and Waste Management Association PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS Approved Acoustical Consultant • County of San Diego FHWA Traffic Noise Model of Training • November 2004 CadnaA Basic and Advanced Training Certificate • January 2024 Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx 52 This page was intentionally left blank. Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx APPENDIX 3.1: CITY OF FONTANA MUNICIPAL CODE Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx This page was intentionally left blank. 6/22/22, 1 :26 PM ARTICLE II. -NOISE Footnotes: -(2)- Fontana, CA Code of Ordinances Cross reference--Raceways, racetracks and drag strips,§ 17-391 et seq. Sec. 18-61. -Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Aircraft means any contrivance invented, used or designated for navigation or for flight in the air. The word "aircraft" shall include helicopters and lighter-than-air dirigibles and balloons. Sound amplifying equipment means any machine or device for the amplification of the human voice, music or any other sound. The term "sound amplifying equipment" shall not be construed as including standard automobile radios when used and heard only by occupants of the vehicle in which installed, or warning devices on authorized emergency vehicles, or horns or other warning devices on other vehicles used only for traffic safety purposes. Sound truck means any motor vehicle or horse-drawn vehicle having mounted thereon or attached thereto any sound amplifying equipment. (Code 1968, § 17-1) Cross reference-Definitions and rules of construction generally, § 1-2. Sec. 18-62. -Prohibited noise generally, penalties, remedies. (a) It shall be unlawful for any person within the city to make, cause, or to continue to make or cause, loud, excessive, impulsive or intrusive sound or noise that annoys or disturbs persons of ordinary sensibilities. (b) All violations of any portion of this article shall be punished as either an infraction or misdemeanor, pursuant to Fontana Municipal Code section 1-7. and may be punished as provided therein. (c) Any person who negligently or knowingly violates any provision of this article may also be subject to administrative fine(s) pursuant to section 2-442 of this Code. The city council may establish. through resolution. the maximum amounts for all administrative fines issued pursuant to this section. In the absence of any resolution. where the violation would otherwise be an infraction or misdemeanor. the administrative fine shall not exceed the maximum fine amounts for infractions and misdemeanors set forth in Government Code §§ 36900 and 36901. The manner of issuing administrative citations shall comply with all the procedures specified in article XI of chaP-ter 2 of this Code. The remedies set forth in this article are nonexclusive and the city may seek any and all legal and equitable relief permitted by law in addition to those remedies set forth in this article. (Code 1968. § 17-2; Ord. No. 1560. § 1. 9-11-07) Sec. 18-63. -Scope, enumeration of prohibited noises. (a) This article shall apply to loud. excessive, impulsive or intrusive interior and exterior sound or noise that annoys or disturbs persons of ordinary sensibilities emanating from any type of property or source within the city. 1/6 6/22/22, 1 :26 PM Fontana, CA Code of Ordinances (b) The following acts, which create loud, excessive, impulsive or intrusive sound or noise that annoys or disturbs persons of ordinary sensibilities from a distance of 50 feet or more from the edge of the property, structure or unit in which the source is located, are declared to be in violation of this article, but such enumeration shall not be deemed to be exclusive, namely: (1) Horns, signaling devices, etc. The sounding of any horn or signaling device on any automobile, motorcycle, streetcar or other vehicle on any street or public place of the city, except as a danger warning; the creation by means of any such signaling device of any unreasonably loud, excessive, impulsive or intrusive noise; and the sounding of any such device for an unnecessary and unreasonable period of time; the use of any signaling device except one operated by hand or electricity; the use of any horn, whistle or other device operated by engine exhaust; and the use of any such signaling device when traffic is for any reason held up. (2) Sound amplifying equipment. The use or operation of any radio receiving set, musical instrument, phonograph, loudspeaker, sound amplifier or any other machine or device in a manner that creates loud, excessive, impulsive or intrusive noise that annoys or disturbs a person of ordinary sensibilities. Such sound amplifying equipment shall not be construed to include electronic devices, including, but not limited to, radios, tape players, tape recorders, compact disc players, MP3 players, electric keyboards, music synthesizers, record players or televisions, which are designed and operated for personal use, or used entirely within a building and are not designed or used to convey the human voice, music or any other sound to an audience outside such building, or which are used in vehicles and heard only by occupants of the vehicle in which installed. (3) Animals, birds, etc. Keeping any animal or allowing any animal to be kept or suffering, or permitting any animal to remain upon the premises under the control of a person, when such animal habitually barks, whines or makes loud, excessive, impulsive or intrusive noises in such a manner as to disturb the peace and quiet of the neighbors surrounding or in the vicinity of such premises, or whose barking or howling or other sound or cry interferes with any person of ordinary sensitiveness in the reasonable and comfortable enjoyment of life and property. (4) Exhausts. The discharge into the open air of the exhaust of any steam engine, stationary internal combustion engine, motorboat or motor vehicle, except through a muffler or other device which will effectively prevent loud, excessive, impulsive or intrusive noises therefrom; provided, however, that the provisions of this section and article do not apply to any raceway, racetrack or drag strip which is being operated in accordance with the provisions of chaP-ter 17, article IX. (5) Defect in vehicle or load. The use of any automobile, motorcycle or vehicle so out of repair or loaded or used in such manner as to create loud, excessive, impulsive or intrusive and unnecessary grating, grinding, rattling or other noise. (6) Loading, unloading or opening boxes. The creation of a loud, excessive, impulsive or intrusive and excessive noise in connection with loading or unloading of any vehicle or the opening and destruction of bales, boxes, crates and containers. (7) Construction or repairing of buildings or structures. The erection (including excavating), demolition, alteration or repair of any building or structure other than between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on weekdays and between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, except in case of urgent necessity in the interest of public health and safety, and then only with a permit from the building inspector, which permit may be granted for a period not to exceed three days or less while the emergency continues and which permit may be renewed for periods of three days or less while the emergency continues. If the building inspector should determine that the public health and safety will not be impaired by the erection, demolition, alteration or repair of any building or structure or the excavation of streets and highways within the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m., and if he shall further determine that loss or inconvenience would 2/6 6/22/22, 1 :26 PM Fontana, CA Code of Ordinances result to any party in interest, he may grant permission for such work to be done on weekdays within the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m., upon application being made at the time the permit for the work is awarded or during the progress of the work. (8) Noise near schools, courts, place of worship or hospitals. The creation of any loud, excessive, impulsive or intrusive noise on any street adjacent to any school, institution of learning, places of worship or court while the premises are in use, or adjacent to any hospital which unreasonably interferes with the workings of such institution or which disturbs or unduly annoys patients in the hospital; provided conspicuous signs are displayed in such streets indicating that the street is a school, hospital or court street. (9) Transportation of metal rails, pillars and columns. The transportation of rails, pillars or columns of iron, steel or other material over and along streets and other public places upon carts, drays, cars or trucks, or in any other manner so loaded as to cause loud, excessive, impulsive or intrusive noise or as to disturb the peace and quiet of such streets or other public places. (10) Piledrivers, hammers, etc. The operation between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. of any piled river, steamshovel, pneumatic hammer, derrick, steam or electric hoist or other appliance, the use of which is attended by loud, excessive, impulsive or intrusive noise. (11) Blowers. The operation of any noise-creating blower or power fan or any internal combustion engine other than from the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on a weekday and the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on a Saturday, the operation of which causes noise due to the explosion of operating gases or fluids, unless the noise from such blower or fan is muffled and such engine is equipped with a muffler device sufficient to deaden such noise. (Code 1968, § 17-3; Ord. No.1460, § 2, 10-5-04; Ord. No.1560, § 2, 9-11-07) Sec. 18-64. -Noncommercial use of sound trucks. (a) Registration required. No person shall use or cause to be used a sound truck with its sound amplifying equipment in operation for noncommercial purposes in the city before filing a registration statement with the license collector in writing. This registration statement shall be filed in duplicate and shall state the following: (1) The name and home address of the applicant. (2) The address of the place of business of the applicant. (3) The license number and motor number of the sound truck to be used by the applicant. (4) The name and address of the person who owns the sound truck. (5) The name and address of the person having direct charge of the sound truck. (6) The names and addresses of all persons who will use or operate the sound truck. (7) The purpose for which the sound truck will be used. (8) A general statement as to the section of the city in which the sound truck will be used. (9) The proposed hours of operation of the sound truck. (10) The number of days of proposed operation of the sound truck. (11) A general description of the sound amplifying equipment which is to be used. (12) The maximum sound producing power of the sound amplifying equipment to be used in or on the sound truck, stating the following: a. The wattage to be used. 3/6 6/22/22, 1 :26 PM Fontana, CA Code of Ordinances b. The volume, in decibels, of the sound which will be produced. c. The approximate maximum distance for which sound will be thrown from the sound truck. (b) Changes to registration statement. All persons using or causing to be used sound trucks for noncommercial purposes shall amend any registration statement filed pursuant to subsection (a) of this section within 48 hours after any change in the information therein furnished. (c) Certification of registration; display. The city clerk shall return to each applicant under subsection (a) of this section one copy of such registration duly certified by the city clerk as a correct copy of the application. The certified copy of the application shall be in the possession of any person operating the sound truck at all times while the sound truck's sound amplifying equipment is in operation, and such copy shall be promptly displayed and shown to any police officer of the city upon request. (d) Regulations for use. Noncommercial use of sound trucks in the city with sound amplifying equipment in operation shall be subject to the following regulations: (1) The only sounds permitted are music or human speech. (2) Operations are permitted for four hours each day, except on Sundays and legal holidays, when no operations shall be authorized. The permitted four hours of operation shall be between the hours of 11 :30 a.m. and 1 :30 p.m. and between the hours of 4:30 p.m. and 6:30 p.m. (3) Sound amplifying equipment shall not be operated unless the sound truck upon which such equipment is mounted is operated at a speed of at least ten miles per hour except when the truck is stopped or impeded by traffic. Where stopped by traffic the sound amplifying equipment shall not be operated for longer than one minute at each such stop. (4) Sound shall not be issued within 100 yards of hospitals, schools, churches or courthouses. (5) No sound truck with its amplifying device in operation shall be operated on any streets between the points designated as follows: bounded on the south by Randall Avenue, on the west by Juniper Avenue, on the north by Foothill Boulevard and on the east by Mango Avenue. (6) The human speech and music amplified shall not be profane, lewd, indecent or slanderous. (7) The volume of sound shall be controlled so that it will not be audible for a distance in excess of 100 feet from the sound truck and so that such volume is not unreasonably loud, raucous, jarring, disturbing or a nuisance to persons within the area of audibility. (8) No sound amplifying equipment shall be operated with an excess of 15 watts of power in the last stage of amplification. (Code 1968, § 17-4) Cross reference-Motor vehicles and traffic, ch. 17. Sec. 18-65. -Commercial advertising by sound trucks. (a) License required. No person shall operate or cause to be operated any sound truck in the city for commercial advertising purposes with sound amplifying equipment in operation unless a license has been obtained from the license collector. There shall be no charge for the license. (b) Application for license. Persons applying for the license required under subsection (a) of this section shall file with the license collector an application in writing, giving in such application the information required in the registration statement required under subsection 18-64(a). (c) Issuance of license. The license collector shall issue a license under subsection (a) of this section unless the application 4/6 6/22/22, 1 :26 PM Fontana, CA Code of Ordinances required reveals that the applicant would violate the regulations prescribed in subsection 18-64(d) or the provisions of this Code or any ordinance of the city. (d) Possession and display of license. A licensee shall keep such license in his possession in the sound truck during the time the sound truck's sound amplifying equipment is in operation. The license shall be promptly displayed and shown to any police officer of the city upon request. (e) Regulations for use. No person shall operate or cause to be operated any sound truck for commercial sound advertising purposes in violation of the regulations set forth in subsection 18-64(d). (Code 1968, § 17-5) Cross reference-Advertising and signs, ch. 3; licenses, permits and business regulations, ch. 15; motor vehicles and traffic, ch. 17. Sec. 18-66. -Noncommercial use of aircraft for sound amplifying purposes. (a) Registration required. No person shall operate or cause to be operated any aircraft for noncommercial purposes in or over the city with sound amplifying equipment in operation before filing a registration statement with the license collector in writing. This registration statement shall be filed in duplicate and shall state the following: (1) The name and home address of the applicant. (2) The address of the place of business of the applicant. (3) The federal N.C. registration number and aircraft motor number of the aircraft to be used by the applicant. (4) The name and address of the person who owns the aircraft. (5) The name and address of the person having direct charge of the aircraft. (6) The name and address of all persons who will use or operate the aircraft. (7) The purpose for which the aircraft will be used. (8) A general statement as to the sections of the city over which the aircraft will be used. (9) The proposed hours of operation of the aircraft. (10) The number of days of proposed operation of the aircraft. (11) A general description of the sound equipment which is to be used. (12) The maximum sound producing power of the sound amplifying equipment to be used in or on the aircraft, stating: a. The wattage to be used. b. The volume in decibels of the sound which will be produced. c. The approximate maximum distance for which sound will be thrown from the aircraft. (b) Changes to registration statement. All persons using or causing to be used aircraft for noncommercial purposes shall amend any registration statement filed pursuant to subsection (a) of this section within 48 hours after any change in the information therein furnished. (c) Certification of registration; display. The city shall return to each applicant under subsection (a) of this section one copy of the registration statement duly certified by the city clerk as a correct copy of the application. The certified copy of the application shall be in the possession of any person operating the aircraft at all times while the aircraft's sound amplifying equipment is in operation, and such copy shall be promptly displayed and shown to any police officer of the city upon request. (Code 1968, § 17-6) 5/6 6/22/22, 1 :26 PM Fontana, CA Code of Ordinances Sec. 18-67. -Commercial advertising by aircraft. (a) License required. No person shall operate or cause to be operated any aircraft in or over the city for commercial advertising purposes with sound amplifying equipment in operation unless a license has been obtained from the license collector. There shall be no charge for the license. (b) Application for license. Persons applying for the license required under subsection (a) of this section shall file with the license collector an application in writing, giving in the application the information required in the registration statement under section 18-66(a). (c) Issuance of license. The license collector shall issue a license under subsection (a) of this section unless the application required in subsection (b) of this section reveals that the applicant would violate the regulations prescribed in subsection (d) of this section or some other provision of this Code or an ordinance of the city. (d) Possession and display of license. A licensee shall keep his license in his possession in the aircraft during the time the aircraft's sound amplifying equipment is in operation. The license shall be promptly displayed and shown to any police officer of the city upon request. (e) Regulations for use. Commercial advertising with sound amplifying equipment from aircraft shall be subject to the following regulations: (1) The only sounds permitted are music or human speech. (2) Sound advertising is permitted only between the hours of 11 :30 a.m. and 1 :30 p.m. and between the hours of 4:30 p.m. and 6:30 p.m. (3) Sound amplifying equipment shall not be operated while an aircraft is flying at an altitude of less than 1,500 feet. (4) Sound shall be issued from one loudspeaker only on each aircraft. (5) The cone of sound from the loudspeaker shall be directed so as to cover at one time an area on the ground of less than 700 square yards and so as to avoid hospitals, schools, churches and courthouses. (6) Human speech and music amplified shall not be lewd, indecent or slanderous. (7) The volume of sound shall be controlled so that it is not audible on the ground over an area in excess of 700 square yards and so that such volume is not unreasonably loud, raucous, jarring, disturbing or a nuisance to persons within the area of audibility. (Code 1968, § 17-7) Cross reference-Advertising and signs, ch. 3: licenses, permits and business regulations, ch. 15. Secs. 18-68-18-89. -Reserved. 6/6 5/28/24, 2:07 PM Fontana, CA Zoning and Development Code Sec. 30-469. -Noise. No use shall create or cause to be created any sound that exceeds the ambient noise standards outlined in Table 30-469. No use shall create or cause creation of noise from a portable electronic device such as a car stereo, portable radio and/or cassette/compact disc player or similar device which exceeds the ambient noise standards outlined in Table 30-469. Table 30-469 Noise Standards Location of Measurement Maximum Allowable All zoning districts 7:00 a.m. 10:00 p.m. until until 10:00 p.m. 7:00 a.m. Interior 45 db 45 db Exterior 65 db 65 db about:blank 1/1 Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx This page was intentionally left blank. Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx APPENDIX 5.1: NOISE MEASUREMENT PHOTOS Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx This page was intentionally left blank. 15975 - Maple Apartments 15975_L1_B 1.North 34, 6' 31.040000"117, 24' 24.010000" 15975_L1_B 2.South 34, 6' 31.040000"117, 24' 23.980000" 15975_L1_B 3.East 34, 6' 31.030000"117, 24' 23.980000" 15975_L1_B 4.West 34, 6' 31.030000"117, 24' 23.980000" 15975 - Maple Apartments 15975_L2_C 1.North 34, 6' 31.000000"117, 24' 22.280000" 15975_L2_C 2.South 34, 6' 30.950000"117, 24' 22.140000" 15975_L2_C 3.East 34, 6' 30.950000"117, 24' 22.170000" 15975_L2_C 4.West 34, 6' 30.920000"117, 24' 22.200000" 15975 - Maple Apartments 15975_L3_D 1.North 34, 6' 30.410000"117, 24' 18.870000" 15975_L3_D 2.South 34, 6' 30.400000"117, 24' 18.790000" 15975_L3_D 3.East 34, 6' 30.390000"117, 24' 18.790000" 15975_L3_D 4.West 34, 6' 30.370000"117, 24' 18.850000" 15975 - Maple Apartments 15975_L4_E 1.North 34, 6' 23.200000"117, 24' 16.730000" 15975_L4_E 2.South 34, 6' 22.830000"117, 24' 16.700000" 15975_L4_E 3.East 34, 6' 22.850000"117, 24' 16.700000" 15975_L4_E 4.West 34, 6' 22.820000"117, 24' 16.680000" ., 15975 - Maple Apartments 15975_L6_H 1.North 34, 6' 24.750000"117, 24' 24.830000" 15975_L6_H 2.South 34, 6' 24.670000"117, 24' 24.890000" 15975_L6_H 3.East 34, 6' 24.630000"117, 24' 24.890000" 15975_L6_H 4.West 34, 6' 24.670000"117, 24' 25.440000" 15975 - Maple Apartments 15975_L5_G 1.North 34, 6' 21.240000"117, 24' 16.680000" 15975_L5_G 2.South 34, 6' 21.140000"117, 24' 16.650000" 15975_L5_G 3.East 34, 6' 21.090000"117, 24' 16.680000" 15975_L5_G 4.West 34, 6' 21.100000"117, 24' 16.700000" Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx APPENDIX 5.2: NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENT WORKSHEETS Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx This page was intentionally left blank. Date:Location:Meter:Piccolo II JN:15975 Project:Maple Apartments Source:Analyst:Z. Ibrahim Timeframe Hour L eq L max L min L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99%L eq Adj.Adj. L eq 0 45.3 55.1 38.9 54.6 54.0 51.7 49.7 44.7 42.0 39.6 39.3 39.0 45.3 10.0 55.3 1 42.3 48.3 38.2 48.0 47.6 46.7 46.0 43.0 40.4 38.8 38.6 38.3 42.3 10.0 52.3 2 47.6 58.0 37.3 57.7 57.3 55.9 53.9 44.3 40.8 38.0 37.7 37.4 47.6 10.0 57.6 3 40.3 46.6 34.9 46.2 45.8 44.9 44.2 40.8 38.7 36.0 35.6 35.1 40.3 10.0 50.3 4 46.6 58.3 36.6 57.8 56.8 53.1 50.6 45.0 42.2 38.3 37.7 36.9 46.6 10.0 56.6 5 49.4 57.9 41.1 57.5 57.1 55.1 53.4 49.5 47.2 43.3 42.5 41.5 49.4 10.0 59.4 6 52.2 63.1 41.4 62.8 62.3 59.8 57.4 50.1 46.4 42.6 42.1 41.6 52.2 10.0 62.2 7 53.1 63.0 43.2 62.6 62.0 59.9 58.0 52.5 48.1 44.9 44.2 43.5 53.1 0.0 53.1 8 55.2 67.4 42.6 67.0 66.2 62.7 59.8 51.7 47.8 44.1 43.4 42.8 55.2 0.0 55.2 9 53.0 64.9 43.8 64.2 63.3 60.1 57.4 51.0 47.6 45.1 44.6 44.1 53.0 0.0 53.0 10 51.9 62.7 42.6 62.3 61.7 59.5 56.9 49.2 46.6 43.7 43.3 42.8 51.9 0.0 51.9 11 54.9 64.0 47.6 63.2 62.5 60.2 58.9 55.9 51.9 48.4 48.0 47.7 54.9 0.0 54.9 12 53.6 63.5 47.8 63.1 62.5 59.6 57.3 52.4 50.9 48.9 48.4 48.0 53.6 0.0 53.6 13 53.2 63.7 46.2 63.2 62.5 59.6 57.4 51.8 49.6 47.3 46.9 46.4 53.2 0.0 53.2 14 53.1 63.2 45.9 62.8 62.0 59.2 56.9 52.3 50.1 47.1 46.6 46.1 53.1 0.0 53.1 15 54.2 64.2 47.1 63.9 63.2 60.6 58.4 53.3 50.8 48.2 47.8 47.3 54.2 0.0 54.2 16 53.6 63.6 45.8 63.3 62.7 60.1 58.0 52.3 50.0 47.1 46.6 46.0 53.6 0.0 53.6 17 55.5 64.1 49.2 63.6 62.9 60.7 58.9 55.6 53.5 50.6 50.1 49.4 55.5 0.0 55.5 18 55.9 63.1 49.7 62.7 62.2 60.6 59.5 56.4 54.5 51.4 50.7 50.0 55.9 0.0 55.9 19 65.0 75.0 52.2 74.0 73.2 71.2 69.7 65.2 61.3 55.2 53.9 52.6 65.0 5.0 70.0 20 59.4 69.4 48.5 68.7 68.2 66.3 64.0 58.9 55.2 50.5 49.8 48.8 59.4 5.0 64.4 21 53.7 63.2 46.4 62.7 62.0 59.5 57.4 53.4 51.2 47.8 47.3 46.6 53.7 5.0 58.7 22 51.2 61.3 43.3 60.9 60.4 57.8 55.4 50.0 47.9 44.6 44.1 43.5 51.2 10.0 61.2 23 47.6 55.5 41.2 55.1 54.5 52.7 51.4 48.0 45.5 42.5 41.9 41.3 47.6 10.0 57.6 Timeframe Hour L e L ma L min L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99% Min 51.9 62.7 42.6 62.3 61.7 59.2 56.9 49.2 46.6 43.7 43.3 42.8 Max 65.0 75.0 52.2 74.0 73.2 71.2 69.7 65.2 61.3 55.2 53.9 52.6 56.9 64.5 63.8 61.3 59.2 54.1 51.3 48.0 47.4 46.8 Min 40.3 46.6 34.9 46.2 45.8 44.9 44.2 40.8 38.7 36.0 35.6 35.1 Max 52.2 63.1 43.3 62.8 62.3 59.8 57.4 50.1 47.9 44.6 44.1 43.5 48.3 55.6 55.1 53.1 51.3 46.2 43.5 40.4 39.9 39.4 Night Day Leq (dBA)24-Hour CNELDay Night Energy Average Energy Average Average: Average: Daytime (7am-10pm) Nighttime (10pm-7am) 59.7 56.9 48.3 24-Hour Noise Level Measurement Summary Hourly L eq dBA Readings (unadjusted) Night Tuesday, May 14, 2024 L1 - Located north of the site near the residence at 18242 Barbee St. 45 . 3 42 . 3 47 . 6 40 . 3 46 . 6 49 . 4 52 . 2 53 . 1 55 . 2 53 . 0 51 . 9 54 . 9 53 . 6 53 . 2 53 . 1 54 . 2 53 . 6 55 . 5 55 . 9 65 . 0 59 . 4 53 . 7 51 . 2 47 . 6 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 60.0 65.0 70.0 75.0 80.0 85.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Ho u r l y L eq (d B A ) Hour Beginning Z:\Shared\UcJobs\_15600-16000\_15900\15975\04_Noise\fieldwork\measurements\15975_L1_B.xlsx ~!!!!ft! Date:Location:Meter:Piccolo II JN:15975 Project:Maple Apartments Source:Analyst:Z. Ibrahim Timeframe Hour L eq L max L min L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99%L eq Adj.Adj. L eq 0 47.1 57.7 40.0 57.3 56.6 53.3 50.9 46.1 43.5 40.7 40.4 40.1 47.1 10.0 57.1 1 43.5 49.8 39.2 49.3 48.8 47.6 46.9 44.4 41.9 39.8 39.6 39.3 43.5 10.0 53.5 2 44.5 54.2 38.1 54.0 53.5 51.1 48.6 43.6 41.1 38.8 38.5 38.2 44.5 10.0 54.5 3 43.3 51.5 37.0 51.0 50.5 48.8 47.7 43.5 40.8 37.7 37.4 37.1 43.3 10.0 53.3 4 47.1 57.1 36.9 56.7 56.2 54.0 52.0 46.3 42.8 38.2 37.6 37.0 47.1 10.0 57.1 5 51.9 60.6 41.7 59.9 59.3 57.6 56.3 52.4 49.3 44.8 43.8 42.1 51.9 10.0 61.9 6 51.8 62.2 41.5 61.8 61.2 58.8 56.5 50.4 47.8 43.6 42.6 41.8 51.8 10.0 61.8 7 56.3 69.9 45.3 69.0 67.7 63.0 58.8 52.3 49.9 46.7 46.1 45.5 56.3 0.0 56.3 8 62.2 72.0 44.8 71.3 70.8 69.0 67.6 64.0 53.0 46.7 46.0 45.2 62.2 0.0 62.2 9 55.6 64.9 43.7 64.3 63.6 61.5 60.2 56.8 52.0 44.9 44.5 43.9 55.6 0.0 55.6 10 51.4 63.0 42.9 62.5 61.8 58.9 55.8 48.8 46.4 43.9 43.5 43.1 51.4 0.0 51.4 11 59.7 64.7 57.9 64.2 63.6 62.2 61.4 59.8 59.1 58.3 58.2 57.9 59.7 0.0 59.7 12 53.6 63.8 47.3 63.4 62.8 60.0 57.5 52.2 50.4 48.4 48.0 47.4 53.6 0.0 53.6 13 54.3 65.3 45.9 65.0 64.4 61.7 58.4 52.0 49.6 47.1 46.7 46.1 54.3 0.0 54.3 14 53.5 63.2 46.3 62.4 61.7 59.6 58.0 53.0 50.5 47.6 47.2 46.5 53.5 0.0 53.5 15 54.3 64.1 46.9 63.7 63.1 60.4 58.5 53.8 51.1 48.0 47.5 47.0 54.3 0.0 54.3 16 53.9 63.5 46.3 63.2 62.6 60.1 58.3 53.3 50.7 47.6 47.1 46.5 53.9 0.0 53.9 17 57.7 69.6 48.7 68.9 68.2 64.0 61.3 55.7 53.4 50.1 49.6 48.9 57.7 0.0 57.7 18 56.5 65.2 49.9 64.2 63.2 61.4 60.4 56.9 54.6 51.5 50.9 50.2 56.5 0.0 56.5 19 56.1 63.2 49.4 62.7 62.3 60.8 59.8 56.9 54.6 51.1 50.4 49.7 56.1 5.0 61.1 20 53.6 61.7 47.4 61.2 60.7 58.8 57.5 53.8 51.7 48.7 48.2 47.6 53.6 5.0 58.6 21 54.4 66.2 45.7 65.7 64.7 61.9 58.3 51.7 49.6 46.8 46.3 45.9 54.4 5.0 59.4 22 53.1 64.7 43.8 64.4 63.8 60.4 57.7 50.1 47.9 44.8 44.4 43.9 53.1 10.0 63.1 23 48.3 56.2 41.8 55.8 55.3 53.8 52.2 48.6 46.2 43.0 42.4 41.9 48.3 10.0 58.3 Timeframe Hour L e L ma L min L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99% Min 51.4 61.7 42.9 61.2 60.7 58.8 55.8 48.8 46.4 43.9 43.5 43.1 Max 62.2 72.0 57.9 71.3 70.8 69.0 67.6 64.0 59.1 58.3 58.2 57.9 56.5 64.8 64.1 61.6 59.5 54.7 51.8 48.5 48.0 47.4 Min 43.3 49.8 36.9 49.3 48.8 47.6 46.9 43.5 40.8 37.7 37.4 37.0 Max 53.1 64.7 43.8 64.4 63.8 60.4 57.7 52.4 49.3 44.8 44.4 43.9 49.2 56.7 56.1 53.9 52.1 47.3 44.6 41.3 40.7 40.2 Night Day Leq (dBA)24-Hour CNELDay Night Energy Average Energy Average Average: Average: Daytime (7am-10pm) Nighttime (10pm-7am) 58.3 56.5 49.2 24-Hour Noise Level Measurement Summary Hourly L eq dBA Readings (unadjusted) Night Tuesday, May 14, 2024 L2 - Located north of the site near the residence at 18270 Barbee St. 47 . 1 43 . 5 44 . 5 43 . 3 47 . 1 51 . 9 51 . 8 56 . 3 62 . 2 55 . 6 51 . 4 59 . 7 53 . 6 54 . 3 53 . 5 54 . 3 53 . 9 57 . 7 56 . 5 56 . 1 53 . 6 54 . 4 53 . 1 48 . 3 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 60.0 65.0 70.0 75.0 80.0 85.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Ho u r l y L eq (d B A ) Hour Beginning Z:\Shared\UcJobs\_15600-16000\_15900\15975\04_Noise\fieldwork\measurements\15975_L2_C.xlsx ~!!!!!ft!! Date:Location:Meter:Piccolo II JN:15975 Project:Maple Apartments Source:Analyst:Z. Ibrahim Timeframe Hour L eq L max L min L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99%L eq Adj.Adj. L eq 0 50.3 61.7 37.0 61.2 60.6 58.4 56.2 47.2 41.7 38.2 37.6 37.2 50.3 10.0 60.3 1 48.3 60.0 37.0 59.4 58.8 56.4 53.9 44.7 40.5 37.7 37.4 37.1 48.3 10.0 58.3 2 46.2 56.7 35.3 56.3 55.7 54.4 52.6 43.0 39.3 36.0 35.7 35.4 46.2 10.0 56.2 3 48.8 60.0 35.7 59.5 58.9 56.9 54.8 45.9 41.2 36.6 36.3 35.8 48.8 10.0 58.8 4 55.7 68.3 36.0 67.7 66.7 63.7 60.9 51.6 45.4 37.5 36.7 36.1 55.7 10.0 65.7 5 60.8 69.3 50.6 68.3 67.7 66.1 64.8 61.3 58.7 55.6 54.6 52.4 60.8 10.0 70.8 6 59.4 69.4 42.5 68.8 68.2 66.2 64.6 59.6 54.2 46.2 44.6 43.0 59.4 10.0 69.4 7 67.6 81.9 45.8 81.1 79.6 75.3 71.1 61.9 56.6 48.4 47.1 46.1 67.6 0.0 67.6 8 62.2 71.7 47.1 71.4 70.8 69.0 67.4 62.3 57.1 50.0 48.4 47.4 62.2 0.0 62.2 9 57.5 67.7 42.4 67.3 66.9 65.2 63.3 56.4 50.4 44.4 43.5 42.7 57.5 0.0 57.5 10 57.3 67.5 42.0 67.0 66.5 65.2 63.3 56.6 49.4 43.8 42.9 42.2 57.3 0.0 57.3 11 58.3 68.4 45.3 68.1 67.5 65.7 64.1 57.4 51.5 46.4 45.9 45.5 58.3 0.0 58.3 12 58.9 68.7 47.6 68.2 67.6 65.8 64.0 58.6 54.5 49.2 48.5 47.8 58.9 0.0 58.9 13 59.8 72.4 45.9 72.0 70.9 67.2 64.2 57.1 51.9 47.3 46.8 46.1 59.8 0.0 59.8 14 58.1 68.0 45.3 67.6 67.1 65.2 63.5 57.9 52.5 46.9 46.1 45.5 58.1 0.0 58.1 15 59.0 67.3 48.9 66.9 66.4 65.3 63.9 59.7 55.3 50.1 49.6 49.1 59.0 0.0 59.0 16 58.1 67.0 46.9 66.7 66.3 64.9 63.4 58.3 53.6 48.8 47.9 47.1 58.1 0.0 58.1 17 58.6 67.5 48.6 66.9 66.4 65.0 63.9 59.0 54.6 50.0 49.4 48.8 58.6 0.0 58.6 18 58.6 67.2 48.6 66.7 66.2 65.1 63.8 59.0 54.3 50.0 49.4 48.7 58.6 0.0 58.6 19 57.1 65.5 48.7 65.0 64.4 63.4 62.1 57.4 53.7 50.0 49.5 48.8 57.1 5.0 62.1 20 56.1 65.3 46.7 64.8 64.2 62.9 61.6 55.9 51.8 47.9 47.4 46.9 56.1 5.0 61.1 21 56.5 66.6 44.4 66.1 65.7 64.1 62.1 55.7 50.4 45.9 45.2 44.6 56.5 5.0 61.5 22 54.1 64.5 41.4 64.1 63.7 61.9 59.9 52.5 47.5 42.7 42.0 41.5 54.1 10.0 64.1 23 53.7 65.2 40.5 64.8 64.3 62.1 58.9 50.1 46.4 42.0 41.3 40.7 53.7 10.0 63.7 Timeframe Hour L e L ma L min L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99% Min 56.1 65.3 42.0 64.8 64.2 62.9 61.6 55.7 49.4 43.8 42.9 42.2 Max 67.6 81.9 48.9 81.1 79.6 75.3 71.1 62.3 57.1 50.1 49.6 49.1 60.2 68.4 67.8 65.9 64.1 58.2 53.2 47.9 47.2 46.5 Min 46.2 56.7 35.3 56.3 55.7 54.4 52.6 43.0 39.3 36.0 35.7 35.4 Max 60.8 69.4 50.6 68.8 68.2 66.2 64.8 61.3 58.7 55.6 54.6 52.4 55.5 63.4 62.7 60.7 58.5 50.7 46.1 41.4 40.7 39.9 Night Day Leq (dBA)24-Hour CNELDay Night Energy Average Energy Average Average: Average: Daytime (7am-10pm) Nighttime (10pm-7am) 63.3 60.2 55.5 24-Hour Noise Level Measurement Summary Hourly L eq dBA Readings (unadjusted) Night Tuesday, May 14, 2024 L3 - Located east of the site near the residence at 495 N Maple Ave. 50 . 3 48 . 3 46 . 2 48 . 8 55 . 7 60 . 8 59 . 4 67 . 6 62 . 2 57 . 5 57 . 3 58 . 3 58 . 9 59 . 8 58 . 1 59 . 0 58 . 1 58 . 6 58 . 6 57 . 1 56 . 1 56 . 5 54 . 1 53 . 7 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 60.0 65.0 70.0 75.0 80.0 85.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Ho u r l y L eq (d B A ) Hour Beginning Z:\Shared\UcJobs\_15600-16000\_15900\15975\04_Noise\fieldwork\measurements\15975_L3_D.xlsx ~!!!!ft!! Date:Location:Meter:Piccolo II JN:15975 Project:Maple Apartments Source:Analyst:Z. Ibrahim Timeframe Hour L eq L max L min L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99%L eq Adj.Adj. L eq 0 63.3 75.8 45.9 75.4 74.6 71.9 68.4 58.5 52.5 47.1 46.5 46.0 63.3 10.0 73.3 1 58.1 68.9 45.9 68.5 68.1 65.8 63.6 56.2 50.0 46.5 46.2 46.0 58.1 10.0 68.1 2 57.6 68.8 45.6 68.4 67.9 65.4 62.9 55.5 49.1 46.1 45.9 45.7 57.6 10.0 67.6 3 58.1 68.9 43.8 68.5 68.0 65.5 63.5 56.9 50.8 44.7 44.3 43.9 58.1 10.0 68.1 4 64.0 75.2 46.9 75.0 74.4 71.8 69.3 62.4 56.0 48.7 47.9 47.1 64.0 10.0 74.0 5 64.6 74.6 48.7 74.2 73.5 71.5 70.1 64.5 58.7 51.1 50.0 49.0 64.6 10.0 74.6 6 65.9 75.7 50.3 75.3 74.6 72.4 70.9 66.4 61.3 52.4 51.3 50.4 65.9 10.0 75.9 7 69.2 78.4 55.1 78.0 77.6 75.8 74.5 69.4 65.5 58.3 56.6 55.3 69.2 0.0 69.2 8 68.0 77.0 54.7 76.6 76.1 74.1 72.7 68.5 65.0 57.7 56.3 54.9 68.0 0.0 68.0 9 65.3 73.1 52.4 72.8 72.4 71.0 70.1 66.6 62.5 54.6 53.5 52.7 65.3 0.0 65.3 10 67.7 78.4 52.2 78.0 77.3 75.6 73.5 66.2 61.8 54.9 53.5 52.4 67.7 0.0 67.7 11 64.8 74.1 51.3 73.5 72.8 70.5 69.2 65.4 61.8 54.4 52.8 51.5 64.8 0.0 64.8 12 67.2 77.3 56.2 76.7 76.2 74.0 71.4 67.0 63.7 58.0 57.3 56.4 67.2 0.0 67.2 13 68.6 81.7 52.4 80.9 79.7 75.4 71.7 66.3 62.7 55.6 54.2 52.6 68.6 0.0 68.6 14 65.4 73.8 53.1 73.5 72.9 71.3 70.0 66.2 62.7 55.6 54.5 53.4 65.4 0.0 65.4 15 66.5 76.0 53.9 75.7 75.2 73.2 71.0 66.7 63.3 56.5 55.5 54.2 66.5 0.0 66.5 16 66.3 74.7 53.9 74.3 73.7 72.2 70.9 66.9 63.5 56.4 55.0 54.1 66.3 0.0 66.3 17 68.0 79.1 55.4 78.7 77.8 74.0 72.3 67.4 63.7 57.7 56.6 55.6 68.0 0.0 68.0 18 66.2 74.4 55.6 74.1 73.6 71.9 70.5 67.0 63.7 57.9 56.8 55.8 66.2 0.0 66.2 19 66.0 75.3 55.2 74.8 74.2 71.9 70.1 66.4 63.3 57.7 56.5 55.4 66.0 5.0 71.0 20 66.2 75.6 54.1 75.2 74.7 72.9 71.2 66.1 62.3 56.4 55.3 54.3 66.2 5.0 71.2 21 65.2 74.6 52.1 74.3 73.7 71.5 69.9 65.6 61.3 54.2 53.2 52.3 65.2 5.0 70.2 22 63.6 73.0 49.3 72.7 72.2 70.3 68.6 64.0 58.8 51.0 50.2 49.5 63.6 10.0 73.6 23 61.8 71.2 48.0 70.8 70.3 68.3 67.0 62.4 56.7 49.6 48.8 48.1 61.8 10.0 71.8 Timeframe Hour L e L ma L min L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99% Min 64.8 73.1 51.3 72.8 72.4 70.5 69.2 65.4 61.3 54.2 52.8 51.5 Max 69.2 81.7 56.2 80.9 79.7 75.8 74.5 69.4 65.5 58.3 57.3 56.4 66.9 75.8 75.2 73.0 71.3 66.8 63.1 56.4 55.2 54.1 Min 57.6 68.8 43.8 68.4 67.9 65.4 62.9 55.5 49.1 44.7 44.3 43.9 Max 65.9 75.8 50.3 75.4 74.6 72.4 70.9 66.4 61.3 52.4 51.3 50.4 62.8 72.1 71.5 69.2 67.1 60.8 54.9 48.6 47.9 47.3 Night Day Leq (dBA)24-Hour CNELDay Night Energy Average Energy Average Average: Average: Daytime (7am-10pm) Nighttime (10pm-7am) 70.5 66.9 62.8 24-Hour Noise Level Measurement Summary Hourly L eq dBA Readings (unadjusted) Night Tuesday, May 14, 2024 L4 - Located southeast of the site near the residence at 367 N Maple Ave. 63 . 3 58 . 1 57 . 6 58 . 1 64 . 0 64 . 6 65 . 9 69 . 2 68 . 0 65 . 3 67 . 7 64 . 8 67 . 2 68 . 6 65 . 4 66 . 5 66 . 3 68 . 0 66 . 2 66 . 0 66 . 2 65 . 2 63 . 6 61 . 8 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 60.0 65.0 70.0 75.0 80.0 85.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Ho u r l y L eq (d B A ) Hour Beginning Z:\Shared\UcJobs\_15600-16000\_15900\15975\04_Noise\fieldwork\measurements\15975_L4_E.xlsx ~Y!!ft! Date:Location:Meter:Piccolo II JN:15975 Project:Maple Apartments Source:Analyst:Z. Ibrahim Timeframe Hour L eq L max L min L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99%L eq Adj.Adj. L eq 0 64.8 77.3 44.5 77.1 76.4 73.0 69.5 60.4 52.9 45.9 45.1 44.7 64.8 10.0 74.8 1 59.8 70.9 43.9 70.5 69.8 67.8 65.8 57.7 49.9 44.8 44.4 44.0 59.8 10.0 69.8 2 58.9 70.2 42.6 69.8 69.2 67.0 64.6 57.0 48.2 43.2 42.9 42.7 58.9 10.0 68.9 3 59.9 70.9 41.6 70.5 70.0 67.6 65.3 58.6 51.5 43.0 42.3 41.7 59.9 10.0 69.9 4 64.5 74.8 46.5 74.5 74.0 72.0 70.2 64.1 57.1 49.0 47.8 46.8 64.5 10.0 74.5 5 66.0 75.4 49.4 75.1 74.7 73.2 71.7 66.0 60.3 51.9 50.6 49.6 66.0 10.0 76.0 6 67.0 75.8 50.7 75.5 75.1 73.5 72.2 67.7 62.4 53.4 51.9 50.9 67.0 10.0 77.0 7 70.2 79.3 56.2 78.9 78.4 76.9 75.4 70.4 66.0 59.1 57.7 56.4 70.2 0.0 70.2 8 68.3 76.1 55.5 75.8 75.3 74.0 73.0 69.4 65.7 58.5 57.2 55.8 68.3 0.0 68.3 9 66.6 74.1 53.2 73.8 73.4 72.3 71.4 68.0 63.7 55.8 54.5 53.4 66.6 0.0 66.6 10 68.9 80.5 53.8 79.8 78.9 76.1 74.2 67.3 63.0 56.4 55.1 54.1 68.9 0.0 68.9 11 66.1 74.8 52.1 74.4 73.9 72.2 70.8 66.8 62.8 55.2 53.7 52.3 66.1 0.0 66.1 12 68.2 78.0 56.5 77.7 77.3 75.3 72.8 68.1 64.5 58.4 57.6 56.8 68.2 0.0 68.2 13 68.3 79.7 52.6 79.1 78.2 75.3 73.1 67.5 63.4 55.9 54.5 52.8 68.3 0.0 68.3 14 66.1 74.1 53.4 73.8 73.4 72.3 71.1 67.1 63.2 55.9 54.8 53.6 66.1 0.0 66.1 15 66.7 75.6 54.1 75.2 74.7 72.9 71.5 67.6 63.5 56.6 55.4 54.3 66.7 0.0 66.7 16 67.1 75.6 53.7 75.3 74.8 73.0 71.7 68.0 64.0 56.2 55.1 53.9 67.1 0.0 67.1 17 69.1 80.3 54.8 79.8 78.9 76.6 73.3 68.4 63.9 57.4 56.2 55.1 69.1 0.0 69.1 18 67.2 75.9 54.6 75.6 75.0 73.3 72.0 67.8 64.0 57.5 56.2 54.9 67.2 0.0 67.2 19 67.1 76.3 54.5 75.9 75.4 73.7 72.0 67.6 63.7 56.9 55.6 54.6 67.1 5.0 72.1 20 67.4 76.7 54.6 76.3 75.9 74.1 72.6 67.7 63.4 57.4 55.9 54.8 67.4 5.0 72.4 21 66.4 75.7 52.0 75.3 74.8 72.7 71.4 66.9 62.2 54.5 53.2 52.2 66.4 5.0 71.4 22 64.8 73.3 49.4 73.0 72.7 71.4 70.3 65.6 60.0 51.3 50.3 49.5 64.8 10.0 74.8 23 63.3 72.2 47.9 72.0 71.6 70.0 68.7 64.1 57.9 49.8 48.8 48.1 63.3 10.0 73.3 Timeframe Hour L e L ma L min L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99% Min 66.1 74.1 52.0 73.8 73.4 72.2 70.8 66.8 62.2 54.5 53.2 52.2 Max 70.2 80.5 56.5 79.8 78.9 76.9 75.4 70.4 66.0 59.1 57.7 56.8 67.8 76.4 75.9 74.1 72.4 67.9 63.8 56.8 55.5 54.3 Min 58.9 70.2 41.6 69.8 69.2 67.0 64.6 57.0 48.2 43.0 42.3 41.7 Max 67.0 77.3 50.7 77.1 76.4 73.5 72.2 67.7 62.4 53.4 51.9 50.9 64.0 73.1 72.6 70.6 68.7 62.4 55.6 48.0 47.1 46.5 Night Day Leq (dBA)24-Hour CNELDay Night Energy Average Energy Average Average: Average: Daytime (7am-10pm) Nighttime (10pm-7am) 71.6 67.8 64.0 24-Hour Noise Level Measurement Summary Hourly L eq dBA Readings (unadjusted) Night Tuesday, May 14, 2024 L5 - Located southeast of the site near the residence at 357 N Maple Ave. 64 . 8 59 . 8 58 . 9 59 . 9 64 . 5 66 . 0 67 . 0 70 . 2 68 . 3 66 . 6 68 . 9 66 . 1 68 . 2 68 . 3 66 . 1 66 . 7 67 . 1 69 . 1 67 . 2 67 . 1 67 . 4 66 . 4 64 . 8 63 . 3 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 60.0 65.0 70.0 75.0 80.0 85.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Ho u r l y L eq (d B A ) Hour Beginning Z:\Shared\UcJobs\_15600-16000\_15900\15975\04_Noise\fieldwork\measurements\15975_L5_G.xlsx C,!!!!!ft!! Date:Location:Meter:Piccolo II JN:15975 Project:Maple Apartments Source:Analyst:Z. Ibrahim Timeframe Hour L eq L max L min L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99%L eq Adj.Adj. L eq 0 56.3 67.3 40.3 67.0 66.4 63.9 62.2 54.7 47.3 41.3 40.7 40.4 56.3 10.0 66.3 1 55.5 67.0 40.2 66.6 66.1 63.7 61.2 52.5 44.8 41.0 40.6 40.3 55.5 10.0 65.5 2 54.9 66.1 38.5 65.8 65.4 63.1 61.0 51.5 43.7 39.2 38.8 38.6 54.9 10.0 64.9 3 55.4 66.5 35.9 66.2 65.6 63.5 61.1 53.2 44.9 36.8 36.3 36.0 55.4 10.0 65.4 4 59.5 70.0 38.6 69.6 69.1 67.3 65.5 58.0 50.8 40.3 39.3 38.7 59.5 10.0 69.5 5 61.1 71.1 42.4 70.7 70.2 68.3 66.7 61.0 54.1 44.4 43.4 42.6 61.1 10.0 71.1 6 62.2 70.5 45.5 70.3 69.9 68.5 67.4 63.4 57.7 48.0 46.7 45.7 62.2 10.0 72.2 7 65.1 73.7 49.1 73.4 73.1 71.7 69.9 65.9 61.8 52.6 50.6 49.3 65.1 0.0 65.1 8 63.5 70.9 49.6 70.7 70.3 68.7 67.8 64.8 61.4 53.0 51.0 49.9 63.5 0.0 63.5 9 62.8 70.3 48.7 70.0 69.5 68.1 67.2 64.2 60.3 52.0 50.3 49.0 62.8 0.0 62.8 10 63.4 71.8 50.7 71.6 71.1 69.5 68.0 64.2 60.5 53.5 52.2 50.9 63.4 0.0 63.4 11 63.0 71.3 49.5 70.9 70.5 68.8 67.4 63.9 60.5 52.9 51.2 49.7 63.0 0.0 63.0 12 66.3 73.7 59.2 73.5 72.9 70.8 69.8 67.0 64.9 61.0 60.3 59.4 66.3 0.0 66.3 13 62.9 71.0 50.2 70.5 69.9 68.2 67.1 64.2 60.6 53.0 51.8 50.4 62.9 0.0 62.9 14 62.7 70.1 48.6 69.8 69.3 67.8 66.8 64.1 60.7 51.9 50.2 48.7 62.7 0.0 62.7 15 62.8 69.8 50.2 69.5 69.1 67.8 67.0 64.3 61.1 53.3 51.9 50.5 62.8 0.0 62.8 16 63.7 72.2 49.2 71.9 71.3 69.3 68.0 64.8 61.2 52.4 50.8 49.5 63.7 0.0 63.7 17 64.0 72.0 52.0 71.8 71.4 69.4 68.2 64.9 61.7 54.7 53.4 52.3 64.0 0.0 64.0 18 64.0 72.6 53.1 72.1 71.6 69.5 68.1 64.8 61.5 55.4 54.3 53.3 64.0 0.0 64.0 19 62.9 70.0 51.5 69.6 69.2 67.9 67.1 64.3 61.0 53.9 52.7 51.7 62.9 5.0 67.9 20 64.1 75.9 48.7 75.1 74.0 70.6 68.3 63.7 59.1 51.0 49.9 48.9 64.1 5.0 69.1 21 62.6 73.8 46.6 73.0 71.9 69.5 67.0 62.7 57.8 48.9 47.8 46.8 62.6 5.0 67.6 22 60.7 69.9 44.3 69.7 69.2 67.8 66.1 61.3 55.2 46.0 45.1 44.5 60.7 10.0 70.7 23 59.1 68.4 43.3 68.1 67.7 66.0 64.5 59.8 53.5 45.0 44.2 43.5 59.1 10.0 69.1 Timeframe Hour L e L ma L min L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99% Min 62.6 69.8 46.6 69.5 69.1 67.8 66.8 62.7 57.8 48.9 47.8 46.8 Max 66.3 75.9 59.2 75.1 74.0 71.7 69.9 67.0 64.9 61.0 60.3 59.4 63.7 71.6 71.0 69.2 67.9 64.5 60.9 53.3 51.9 50.7 Min 54.9 66.1 35.9 65.8 65.4 63.1 61.0 51.5 43.7 36.8 36.3 36.0 Max 62.2 71.1 45.5 70.7 70.2 68.5 67.4 63.4 57.7 48.0 46.7 45.7 59.0 68.2 67.7 65.8 64.0 57.3 50.2 42.4 41.7 41.1 Night Day Leq (dBA)24-Hour CNELDay Night Energy Average Energy Average Average: Average: Daytime (7am-10pm) Nighttime (10pm-7am) 67.0 63.7 59.0 24-Hour Noise Level Measurement Summary Hourly L eq dBA Readings (unadjusted) Night Tuesday, May 14, 2024 L6 - Located south of the site near the residence at 18202 Historic Rte 66 56 . 3 55 . 5 54 . 9 55 . 4 59 . 5 61 . 1 62 . 2 65 . 1 63 . 5 62 . 8 63 . 4 63 . 0 66 . 3 62 . 9 62 . 7 62 . 8 63 . 7 64 . 0 64 . 0 62 . 9 64 . 1 62 . 6 60 . 7 59 . 1 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 60.0 65.0 70.0 75.0 80.0 85.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Ho u r l y L eq (d B A ) Hour Beginning Z:\Shared\UcJobs\_15600-16000\_15900\15975\04_Noise\fieldwork\measurements\15975_L6_H.xlsx ~ !!!!!!ft!! Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx APPENDIX 7.1: ON-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE WORKSHEETS Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx This page was intentionally left blank. FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA Project Name:Maple Apartmets Job Number:15975 Analyst:N. JohnsonLot No:East Building #3 Road Name:Maple Ave. Scenario:Backyard No Wall 10,400 10% 32.0 NOISE MODEL INPUTS Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume:1,040 vehicles Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 65.0Centerline Dist. to Observer: Highway Data feet feet vehicles Road Elevation:0.0 Barrier Elevation:0.0 Pad Elevation:0.0 Site Data Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15 Autos:15 Vehicle Mix feet feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Barrier Height:0.0 Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet feet 35 mphVehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance:12 feet REMEL Traffic Flow Distance -0.69 VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42% 84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84% 86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74% -1.17 Finite Road -1.20 Barrier Atten FHWA Noise Model Calculations 33.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0 0.000 0.000 Fresnel Berm Atten Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType -17.93 -1.15 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -21.88 -1.16 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -0.16 -0.41 -1.47 Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:0.00 2.30 8.01 58.907 58.756 58.771 Grade Adjustment:0.0 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 62.0 60.2 58.4 52.3 61.661.0 54.5 55.8 53.0 46.7 45.1 53.853.6 54.4 45.3 46.6 55.155.0 Vehicle Noise:63.6 61.8 58.9 54.0 63.062.5 Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 62.0 60.2 58.4 52.3 61.661.0 54.5 55.8 53.0 46.7 45.1 53.853.6 54.4 45.3 46.6 55.155.0 Vehicle Noise:63.6 61.8 58.9 54.0 63.062.5 74.83 80.05 65.11 Road Grade:1.0% feet Thursday, May 9, 2024 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA Project Name:Maple Apartmets Job Number:15975 Analyst:N. JohnsonLot No:East Building #4 Road Name:Maple Ave. Scenario:Backyard No Wall 10,400 10% 29.0 NOISE MODEL INPUTS Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume:1,040 vehicles Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 66.0Centerline Dist. to Observer: Highway Data feet feet vehicles Road Elevation:0.0 Barrier Elevation:0.0 Pad Elevation:0.0 Site Data Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15 Autos:15 Vehicle Mix feet feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Barrier Height:0.0 Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet feet 35 mphVehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance:12 feet REMEL Traffic Flow Distance -0.69 VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42% 84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84% 86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74% -1.28 Finite Road -1.20 Barrier Atten FHWA Noise Model Calculations 37.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0 0.000 0.000 Fresnel Berm Atten Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType -17.93 -1.27 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -21.88 -1.27 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -0.13 -0.38 -1.58 Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:0.00 2.30 8.01 59.908 59.760 59.775 Grade Adjustment:0.0 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 61.9 60.0 58.3 52.2 61.460.8 54.4 55.7 52.9 46.6 45.0 53.753.5 54.3 45.2 46.5 55.054.8 Vehicle Noise:63.4 61.7 58.8 53.9 62.962.4 Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 61.9 60.0 58.3 52.2 61.460.8 54.4 55.7 52.9 46.6 45.0 53.753.5 54.3 45.2 46.5 55.054.8 Vehicle Noise:63.4 61.7 58.8 53.9 62.962.4 74.83 80.05 65.11 Road Grade:1.0% feet Thursday, May 9, 2024 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA Project Name:Maple Apartmets Job Number:15975 Analyst:N. JohnsonLot No:South Building #5 Road Name:Foothill Blvd. Scenario:Backyard No Wall 34,000 10% 41.0 NOISE MODEL INPUTS Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume:3,400 vehicles Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 83.0Centerline Dist. to Observer: Highway Data feet feet vehicles Road Elevation:0.0 Barrier Elevation:0.0 Pad Elevation:3.0 Site Data Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15 Autos:15 Vehicle Mix feet feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Barrier Height:0.0 Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet feet 45 mphVehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance:60 feet REMEL Traffic Flow Distance 3.35 VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.00% 84.8%4.9%10.3%2.40% 86.5%2.7%10.8%0.60% 0.67 Finite Road -1.20 Barrier Atten FHWA Noise Model Calculations 42.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0 0.000 0.000 Fresnel Berm Atten Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType -12.72 0.73 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -18.74 0.78 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -0.15 -0.89 -3.29 Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:0.00 2.97 8.01 44.418 43.981 43.692 Grade Adjustment:0.0 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 72.2 70.3 68.5 62.4 71.771.1 64.4 63.0 62.9 56.6 55.0 63.763.5 61.6 52.5 53.8 62.262.1 Vehicle Noise:73.3 71.5 68.9 63.6 72.772.2 Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 72.2 70.3 68.5 62.4 71.771.1 64.4 63.0 62.9 56.6 55.0 63.763.5 61.6 52.5 53.8 62.262.1 Vehicle Noise:73.3 71.5 68.9 63.6 72.772.2 77.62 82.14 69.34 Road Grade:1.0% feet Thursday, May 9, 2024 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA Project Name:Maple Apartmets Job Number:15975 Analyst:N. JohnsonLot No:South Building #6 Road Name:Foothill Blvd. Scenario:Backyard No Wall 34,000 10% 43.0 NOISE MODEL INPUTS Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume:3,400 vehicles Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 85.0Centerline Dist. to Observer: Highway Data feet feet vehicles Road Elevation:0.0 Barrier Elevation:0.0 Pad Elevation:3.0 Site Data Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15 Autos:15 Vehicle Mix feet feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Barrier Height:0.0 Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet feet 45 mphVehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance:60 feet REMEL Traffic Flow Distance 3.35 VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.00% 84.8%4.9%10.3%2.40% 86.5%2.7%10.8%0.60% 0.33 Finite Road -1.20 Barrier Atten FHWA Noise Model Calculations 42.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0 0.000 0.000 Fresnel Berm Atten Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType -12.72 0.39 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -18.74 0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -0.17 -0.84 -2.96 Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:0.00 2.97 8.01 46.787 46.371 46.098 Grade Adjustment:0.0 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 71.8 69.9 68.2 62.1 71.370.7 64.1 62.6 62.6 56.2 54.7 63.463.1 61.2 52.2 53.4 61.961.8 Vehicle Noise:72.9 71.1 68.5 63.3 72.471.9 Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 71.8 69.9 68.2 62.1 71.370.7 64.1 62.6 62.6 56.2 54.7 63.463.1 61.2 52.2 53.4 61.961.8 Vehicle Noise:72.9 71.1 68.5 63.3 72.471.9 77.62 82.14 69.34 Road Grade:1.0% feet Thursday, May 9, 2024 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA Project Name:Maple Apartmets Job Number:15975 Analyst:N. JohnsonLot No:East Building #3 Road Name:Maple Ave. Scenario:Backyard With Wall 10,400 10% 32.0 NOISE MODEL INPUTS Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume:1,040 vehicles Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 65.0Centerline Dist. to Observer: Highway Data feet feet vehicles Road Elevation:0.0 Barrier Elevation:0.0 Pad Elevation:0.0 Site Data Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15 Autos:15 Vehicle Mix feet feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Barrier Height:0.0 Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet feet 35 mphVehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance:12 feet REMEL Traffic Flow Distance -0.69 VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42% 84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84% 86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74% -1.17 Finite Road -1.20 Barrier Atten FHWA Noise Model Calculations 33.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0 0.000 0.000 Fresnel Berm Atten Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType -17.93 -1.15 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -21.88 -1.16 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -0.16 -0.41 -1.47 Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:0.00 2.30 8.01 58.907 58.756 58.771 Grade Adjustment:0.0 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 62.0 60.2 58.4 52.3 61.661.0 54.5 55.8 53.0 46.7 45.1 53.853.6 54.4 45.3 46.6 55.155.0 Vehicle Noise:63.6 61.8 58.9 54.0 63.062.5 Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 62.0 60.2 58.4 52.3 61.661.0 54.5 55.8 53.0 46.7 45.1 53.853.6 54.4 45.3 46.6 55.155.0 Vehicle Noise:63.6 61.8 58.9 54.0 63.062.5 74.83 80.05 65.11 Road Grade:1.0% feet Thursday, May 9, 2024 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA Project Name:Maple Apartmets Job Number:15975 Analyst:N. JohnsonLot No:East Building #4 Road Name:Maple Ave. Scenario:Backyard With Wall 10,400 10% 29.0 NOISE MODEL INPUTS Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume:1,040 vehicles Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 66.0Centerline Dist. to Observer: Highway Data feet feet vehicles Road Elevation:0.0 Barrier Elevation:0.0 Pad Elevation:0.0 Site Data Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15 Autos:15 Vehicle Mix feet feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Barrier Height:0.0 Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet feet 35 mphVehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance:12 feet REMEL Traffic Flow Distance -0.69 VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42% 84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84% 86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74% -1.28 Finite Road -1.20 Barrier Atten FHWA Noise Model Calculations 37.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0 0.000 0.000 Fresnel Berm Atten Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType -17.93 -1.27 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -21.88 -1.27 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -0.13 -0.38 -1.58 Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:0.00 2.30 8.01 59.908 59.760 59.775 Grade Adjustment:0.0 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 61.9 60.0 58.3 52.2 61.460.8 54.4 55.7 52.9 46.6 45.0 53.753.5 54.3 45.2 46.5 55.054.8 Vehicle Noise:63.4 61.7 58.8 53.9 62.962.4 Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 61.9 60.0 58.3 52.2 61.460.8 54.4 55.7 52.9 46.6 45.0 53.753.5 54.3 45.2 46.5 55.054.8 Vehicle Noise:63.4 61.7 58.8 53.9 62.962.4 74.83 80.05 65.11 Road Grade:1.0% feet Thursday, May 9, 2024 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA Project Name:Maple Apartmets Job Number:15975 Analyst:N. JohnsonLot No:South Building #5 Road Name:Foothill Blvd. Scenario:Backyard With Wall 34,000 10% 41.0 NOISE MODEL INPUTS Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume:3,400 vehicles Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 83.0Centerline Dist. to Observer: Highway Data feet feet vehicles Road Elevation:0.0 Barrier Elevation:0.0 Pad Elevation:3.0 Site Data Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15 Autos:15 Vehicle Mix feet feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Barrier Height:0.0 Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet feet 45 mphVehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance:60 feet REMEL Traffic Flow Distance 3.35 VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.00% 84.8%4.9%10.3%2.40% 86.5%2.7%10.8%0.60% 0.67 Finite Road -1.20 Barrier Atten FHWA Noise Model Calculations 42.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0 0.000 0.000 Fresnel Berm Atten Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType -12.72 0.73 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -18.74 0.78 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -0.15 -0.89 -3.29 Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:0.00 2.97 8.01 44.418 43.981 43.692 Grade Adjustment:0.0 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 72.2 70.3 68.5 62.4 71.771.1 64.4 63.0 62.9 56.6 55.0 63.763.5 61.6 52.5 53.8 62.262.1 Vehicle Noise:73.3 71.5 68.9 63.6 72.772.2 Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 72.2 70.3 68.5 62.4 71.771.1 64.4 63.0 62.9 56.6 55.0 63.763.5 61.6 52.5 53.8 62.262.1 Vehicle Noise:73.3 71.5 68.9 63.6 72.772.2 77.62 82.14 69.34 Road Grade:1.0% feet Thursday, May 9, 2024 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA Project Name:Maple Apartmets Job Number:15975 Analyst:N. JohnsonLot No:South Building #6 Road Name:Foothill Blvd. Scenario:Backyard With Wall 34,000 10% 43.0 NOISE MODEL INPUTS Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume:3,400 vehicles Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 85.0Centerline Dist. to Observer: Highway Data feet feet vehicles Road Elevation:0.0 Barrier Elevation:0.0 Pad Elevation:3.0 Site Data Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15 Autos:15 Vehicle Mix feet feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Barrier Height:0.0 Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet feet 45 mphVehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance:60 feet REMEL Traffic Flow Distance 3.35 VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.00% 84.8%4.9%10.3%2.40% 86.5%2.7%10.8%0.60% 0.33 Finite Road -1.20 Barrier Atten FHWA Noise Model Calculations 42.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0 0.000 0.000 Fresnel Berm Atten Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType -12.72 0.39 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -18.74 0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -0.17 -0.84 -2.96 Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:0.00 2.97 8.01 46.787 46.371 46.098 Grade Adjustment:0.0 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 71.8 69.9 68.2 62.1 71.370.7 64.1 62.6 62.6 56.2 54.7 63.463.1 61.2 52.2 53.4 61.961.8 Vehicle Noise:72.9 71.1 68.5 63.3 72.471.9 Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 71.8 69.9 68.2 62.1 71.370.7 64.1 62.6 62.6 56.2 54.7 63.463.1 61.2 52.2 53.4 61.961.8 Vehicle Noise:72.9 71.1 68.5 63.3 72.471.9 77.62 82.14 69.34 Road Grade:1.0% feet Thursday, May 9, 2024 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA Project Name:Maple Apartmets Job Number:15975 Analyst:N. JohnsonLot No:East Building #3 Road Name:Maple Ave. Scenario:First Floor With Wall 10,400 10% 32.0 NOISE MODEL INPUTS Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume:1,040 vehicles Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 65.0Centerline Dist. to Observer: Highway Data feet feet vehicles Road Elevation:0.0 Barrier Elevation:0.0 Pad Elevation:0.0 Site Data Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15 Autos:15 Vehicle Mix feet feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Barrier Height:0.0 Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet feet 35 mphVehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance:12 feet REMEL Traffic Flow Distance -0.69 VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42% 84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84% 86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74% -1.17 Finite Road -1.20 Barrier Atten FHWA Noise Model Calculations 33.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0 0.000 0.000 Fresnel Berm Atten Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType -17.93 -1.15 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -21.88 -1.16 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -0.16 -0.41 -1.47 Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:0.00 2.30 8.01 58.907 58.756 58.771 Grade Adjustment:0.0 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 62.0 60.2 58.4 52.3 61.661.0 54.5 55.8 53.0 46.7 45.1 53.853.6 54.4 45.3 46.6 55.155.0 Vehicle Noise:63.6 61.8 58.9 54.0 63.062.5 Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 62.0 60.2 58.4 52.3 61.661.0 54.5 55.8 53.0 46.7 45.1 53.853.6 54.4 45.3 46.6 55.155.0 Vehicle Noise:63.6 61.8 58.9 54.0 63.062.5 74.83 80.05 65.11 Road Grade:1.0% feet Thursday, May 9, 2024 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA Project Name:Maple Apartmets Job Number:15975 Analyst:N. JohnsonLot No:East Building #4 Road Name:Maple Ave. Scenario:First Floor With Wall 10,400 10% 29.0 NOISE MODEL INPUTS Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume:1,040 vehicles Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 66.0Centerline Dist. to Observer: Highway Data feet feet vehicles Road Elevation:0.0 Barrier Elevation:0.0 Pad Elevation:0.0 Site Data Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15 Autos:15 Vehicle Mix feet feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Barrier Height:0.0 Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet feet 35 mphVehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance:12 feet REMEL Traffic Flow Distance -0.69 VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42% 84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84% 86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74% -1.28 Finite Road -1.20 Barrier Atten FHWA Noise Model Calculations 37.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0 0.000 0.000 Fresnel Berm Atten Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType -17.93 -1.27 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -21.88 -1.27 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -0.13 -0.38 -1.58 Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:0.00 2.30 8.01 59.908 59.760 59.775 Grade Adjustment:0.0 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 61.9 60.0 58.3 52.2 61.460.8 54.4 55.7 52.9 46.6 45.0 53.753.5 54.3 45.2 46.5 55.054.8 Vehicle Noise:63.4 61.7 58.8 53.9 62.962.4 Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 61.9 60.0 58.3 52.2 61.460.8 54.4 55.7 52.9 46.6 45.0 53.753.5 54.3 45.2 46.5 55.054.8 Vehicle Noise:63.4 61.7 58.8 53.9 62.962.4 74.83 80.05 65.11 Road Grade:1.0% feet Thursday, May 9, 2024 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA Project Name:Maple Apartmets Job Number:15975 Analyst:N. JohnsonLot No:South Building #5 Road Name:Foothill Blvd. Scenario:First Floor With Wall 34,000 10% 41.0 NOISE MODEL INPUTS Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume:3,400 vehicles Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 83.0Centerline Dist. to Observer: Highway Data feet feet vehicles Road Elevation:0.0 Barrier Elevation:0.0 Pad Elevation:3.0 Site Data Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15 Autos:15 Vehicle Mix feet feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Barrier Height:0.0 Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet feet 45 mphVehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance:60 feet REMEL Traffic Flow Distance 3.35 VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.00% 84.8%4.9%10.3%2.40% 86.5%2.7%10.8%0.60% 0.67 Finite Road -1.20 Barrier Atten FHWA Noise Model Calculations 42.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0 0.000 0.000 Fresnel Berm Atten Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType -12.72 0.73 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -18.74 0.78 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -0.15 -0.89 -3.29 Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:0.00 2.97 8.01 44.418 43.981 43.692 Grade Adjustment:0.0 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 72.2 70.3 68.5 62.4 71.771.1 64.4 63.0 62.9 56.6 55.0 63.763.5 61.6 52.5 53.8 62.262.1 Vehicle Noise:73.3 71.5 68.9 63.6 72.772.2 Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 72.2 70.3 68.5 62.4 71.771.1 64.4 63.0 62.9 56.6 55.0 63.763.5 61.6 52.5 53.8 62.262.1 Vehicle Noise:73.3 71.5 68.9 63.6 72.772.2 77.62 82.14 69.34 Road Grade:1.0% feet Thursday, May 9, 2024 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA Project Name:Maple Apartmets Job Number:15975 Analyst:N. JohnsonLot No:South Building #6 Road Name:Foothill Blvd. Scenario:First Floor With Wall 34,000 10% 43.0 NOISE MODEL INPUTS Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume:3,400 vehicles Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 85.0Centerline Dist. to Observer: Highway Data feet feet vehicles Road Elevation:0.0 Barrier Elevation:0.0 Pad Elevation:3.0 Site Data Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15 Autos:15 Vehicle Mix feet feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Barrier Height:0.0 Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet feet 45 mphVehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance:60 feet REMEL Traffic Flow Distance 3.35 VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.00% 84.8%4.9%10.3%2.40% 86.5%2.7%10.8%0.60% 0.33 Finite Road -1.20 Barrier Atten FHWA Noise Model Calculations 42.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0 0.000 0.000 Fresnel Berm Atten Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType -12.72 0.39 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -18.74 0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -0.17 -0.84 -2.96 Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:0.00 2.97 8.01 46.787 46.371 46.098 Grade Adjustment:0.0 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 71.8 69.9 68.2 62.1 71.370.7 64.1 62.6 62.6 56.2 54.7 63.463.1 61.2 52.2 53.4 61.961.8 Vehicle Noise:72.9 71.1 68.5 63.3 72.471.9 Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 71.8 69.9 68.2 62.1 71.370.7 64.1 62.6 62.6 56.2 54.7 63.463.1 61.2 52.2 53.4 61.961.8 Vehicle Noise:72.9 71.1 68.5 63.3 72.471.9 77.62 82.14 69.34 Road Grade:1.0% feet Thursday, May 9, 2024 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA Project Name:Maple Apartmets Job Number:15975 Analyst:N. JohnsonLot No:East Building #3 Road Name:Maple Ave. Scenario:Fourth Floor With Wall 10,400 10% 32.0 NOISE MODEL INPUTS Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume:1,040 vehicles Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 65.0Centerline Dist. to Observer: Highway Data feet feet vehicles Road Elevation:0.0 Barrier Elevation:0.0 Pad Elevation:0.0 Site Data Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15 Autos:15 Vehicle Mix feet feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Barrier Height:0.0 Observer Height (Above Pad):32.0 feet feet 35 mphVehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance:12 feet REMEL Traffic Flow Distance -0.69 VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42% 84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84% 86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74% -2.00 Finite Road -1.20 Barrier Atten FHWA Noise Model Calculations 33.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0 0.000 0.000 Fresnel Berm Atten Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType -17.93 -1.89 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -21.88 -1.65 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -4.74 -5.88 -9.28 Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:0.00 2.30 8.01 66.851 65.782 63.409 Grade Adjustment:0.0 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 61.2 59.3 57.6 51.5 60.760.1 53.8 55.3 52.3 45.9 44.4 53.152.9 53.9 44.9 46.1 54.654.5 Vehicle Noise:62.8 61.0 58.1 53.2 62.261.8 Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 61.2 59.3 57.6 51.5 60.760.1 53.8 55.3 52.3 45.9 44.4 53.152.9 53.9 44.9 46.1 54.654.5 Vehicle Noise:62.8 61.0 58.1 53.2 62.261.8 74.83 80.05 65.11 Road Grade:1.0% feet Thursday, May 9, 2024 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA Project Name:Maple Apartmets Job Number:15975 Analyst:N. JohnsonLot No:East Building #4 Road Name:Maple Ave. Scenario:Fourth Floor With Wall 10,400 10% 29.0 NOISE MODEL INPUTS Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume:1,040 vehicles Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 66.0Centerline Dist. to Observer: Highway Data feet feet vehicles Road Elevation:0.0 Barrier Elevation:0.0 Pad Elevation:0.0 Site Data Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15 Autos:15 Vehicle Mix feet feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Barrier Height:0.0 Observer Height (Above Pad):32.0 feet feet 35 mphVehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance:12 feet REMEL Traffic Flow Distance -0.69 VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42% 84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84% 86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74% -2.08 Finite Road -1.20 Barrier Atten FHWA Noise Model Calculations 37.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0 0.000 0.000 Fresnel Berm Atten Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType -17.93 -1.98 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -21.88 -1.75 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -3.83 -4.97 -8.47 Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:0.00 2.30 8.01 67.735 66.680 64.341 Grade Adjustment:0.0 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 61.1 59.2 57.5 51.4 60.660.0 53.7 55.2 52.2 45.9 44.3 53.052.8 53.8 44.8 46.0 54.554.4 Vehicle Noise:62.7 61.0 58.0 53.1 62.261.7 Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 61.1 59.2 57.5 51.4 60.660.0 53.7 55.2 52.2 45.9 44.3 53.052.8 53.8 44.8 46.0 54.554.4 Vehicle Noise:62.7 61.0 58.0 53.1 62.261.7 74.83 80.05 65.11 Road Grade:1.0% feet Thursday, May 9, 2024 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA Project Name:Maple Apartmets Job Number:15975 Analyst:N. JohnsonLot No:South Building #5 Road Name:Foothill Blvd. Scenario:Fourth Floor With Wall 34,000 10% 41.0 NOISE MODEL INPUTS Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume:3,400 vehicles Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 83.0Centerline Dist. to Observer: Highway Data feet feet vehicles Road Elevation:0.0 Barrier Elevation:0.0 Pad Elevation:3.0 Site Data Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15 Autos:15 Vehicle Mix feet feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Barrier Height:0.0 Observer Height (Above Pad):32.0 feet feet 45 mphVehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance:60 feet REMEL Traffic Flow Distance 3.35 VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.00% 84.8%4.9%10.3%2.40% 86.5%2.7%10.8%0.60% -0.84 Finite Road -1.20 Barrier Atten FHWA Noise Model Calculations 42.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0 0.000 0.000 Fresnel Berm Atten Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType -12.72 -0.63 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -18.74 -0.28 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -2.11 -4.05 -8.61 Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:0.00 2.97 8.01 55.982 54.175 51.358 Grade Adjustment:0.0 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 70.7 68.8 67.0 60.9 70.269.6 63.1 61.9 61.6 55.2 53.7 62.462.1 60.5 51.5 52.7 61.261.1 Vehicle Noise:71.8 70.0 67.4 62.2 71.370.8 Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 70.7 68.8 67.0 60.9 70.269.6 63.1 61.9 61.6 55.2 53.7 62.462.1 60.5 51.5 52.7 61.261.1 Vehicle Noise:71.8 70.0 67.4 62.2 71.370.8 77.62 82.14 69.34 Road Grade:1.0% feet Thursday, May 9, 2024 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA Project Name:Maple Apartmets Job Number:15975 Analyst:N. JohnsonLot No:South Building #6 Road Name:Foothill Blvd. Scenario:Fourth Floor With Wall 34,000 10% 43.0 NOISE MODEL INPUTS Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume:3,400 vehicles Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 85.0Centerline Dist. to Observer: Highway Data feet feet vehicles Road Elevation:0.0 Barrier Elevation:0.0 Pad Elevation:3.0 Site Data Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15 Autos:15 Vehicle Mix feet feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Barrier Height:0.0 Observer Height (Above Pad):32.0 feet feet 45 mphVehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance:60 feet REMEL Traffic Flow Distance 3.35 VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.00% 84.8%4.9%10.3%2.40% 86.5%2.7%10.8%0.60% -1.06 Finite Road -1.20 Barrier Atten FHWA Noise Model Calculations 42.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0 0.000 0.000 Fresnel Berm Atten Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType -12.72 -0.86 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -18.74 -0.53 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -2.43 -4.27 -8.48 Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:0.00 2.97 8.01 57.879 56.133 53.420 Grade Adjustment:0.0 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 70.4 68.5 66.8 60.7 69.969.3 62.8 61.7 61.3 55.0 53.4 62.161.9 60.2 51.2 52.5 60.960.8 Vehicle Noise:71.6 69.8 67.2 62.0 71.170.5 Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 70.4 68.5 66.8 60.7 69.969.3 62.8 61.7 61.3 55.0 53.4 62.161.9 60.2 51.2 52.5 60.960.8 Vehicle Noise:71.6 69.8 67.2 62.0 71.170.5 77.62 82.14 69.34 Road Grade:1.0% feet Thursday, May 9, 2024 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA Project Name:Maple Apartmets Job Number:15975 Analyst:N. JohnsonLot No:East Building #3 Road Name:Maple Ave. Scenario:Second Floor With Wall 10,400 10% 32.0 NOISE MODEL INPUTS Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume:1,040 vehicles Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 65.0Centerline Dist. to Observer: Highway Data feet feet vehicles Road Elevation:0.0 Barrier Elevation:0.0 Pad Elevation:0.0 Site Data Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15 Autos:15 Vehicle Mix feet feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Barrier Height:0.0 Observer Height (Above Pad):14.0 feet feet 35 mphVehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance:12 feet REMEL Traffic Flow Distance -0.69 VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42% 84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84% 86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74% -1.33 Finite Road -1.20 Barrier Atten FHWA Noise Model Calculations 33.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0 0.000 0.000 Fresnel Berm Atten Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType -17.93 -1.27 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -21.88 -1.18 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -1.18 -1.76 -3.67 Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:0.00 2.30 8.01 60.341 59.849 58.999 Grade Adjustment:0.0 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 61.9 60.0 58.2 52.2 61.460.8 54.4 55.8 52.9 46.6 45.0 53.753.5 54.4 45.3 46.6 55.154.9 Vehicle Noise:63.4 61.7 58.7 53.8 62.962.4 Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 61.9 60.0 58.2 52.2 61.460.8 54.4 55.8 52.9 46.6 45.0 53.753.5 54.4 45.3 46.6 55.154.9 Vehicle Noise:63.4 61.7 58.7 53.8 62.962.4 74.83 80.05 65.11 Road Grade:1.0% feet Thursday, May 9, 2024 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA Project Name:Maple Apartmets Job Number:15975 Analyst:N. JohnsonLot No:East Building #4 Road Name:Maple Ave. Scenario:Second Floor With Wall 10,400 10% 29.0 NOISE MODEL INPUTS Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume:1,040 vehicles Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 66.0Centerline Dist. to Observer: Highway Data feet feet vehicles Road Elevation:0.0 Barrier Elevation:0.0 Pad Elevation:0.0 Site Data Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15 Autos:15 Vehicle Mix feet feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Barrier Height:0.0 Observer Height (Above Pad):14.0 feet feet 35 mphVehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance:12 feet REMEL Traffic Flow Distance -0.69 VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42% 84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84% 86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74% -1.43 Finite Road -1.20 Barrier Atten FHWA Noise Model Calculations 37.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0 0.000 0.000 Fresnel Berm Atten Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType -17.93 -1.38 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -21.88 -1.29 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -0.93 -1.51 -3.54 Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:0.00 2.30 8.01 61.319 60.836 59.999 Grade Adjustment:0.0 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 61.8 59.9 58.1 52.1 61.360.7 54.3 55.7 52.8 46.5 44.9 53.653.4 54.2 45.2 46.5 54.954.8 Vehicle Noise:63.3 61.6 58.6 53.7 62.862.3 Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 61.8 59.9 58.1 52.1 61.360.7 54.3 55.7 52.8 46.5 44.9 53.653.4 54.2 45.2 46.5 54.954.8 Vehicle Noise:63.3 61.6 58.6 53.7 62.862.3 74.83 80.05 65.11 Road Grade:1.0% feet Thursday, May 9, 2024 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA Project Name:Maple Apartmets Job Number:15975 Analyst:N. JohnsonLot No:South Building #5 Road Name:Foothill Blvd. Scenario:Second Floor With Wall 34,000 10% 41.0 NOISE MODEL INPUTS Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume:3,400 vehicles Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 83.0Centerline Dist. to Observer: Highway Data feet feet vehicles Road Elevation:0.0 Barrier Elevation:0.0 Pad Elevation:3.0 Site Data Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15 Autos:15 Vehicle Mix feet feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Barrier Height:0.0 Observer Height (Above Pad):14.0 feet feet 45 mphVehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance:60 feet REMEL Traffic Flow Distance 3.35 VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.00% 84.8%4.9%10.3%2.40% 86.5%2.7%10.8%0.60% 0.32 Finite Road -1.20 Barrier Atten FHWA Noise Model Calculations 42.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0 0.000 0.000 Fresnel Berm Atten Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType -12.72 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -18.74 0.64 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -0.64 -1.84 -5.05 Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:0.00 2.97 8.01 46.883 45.889 44.608 Grade Adjustment:0.0 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 71.8 69.9 68.1 62.1 71.370.7 64.2 62.8 62.6 56.3 54.7 63.463.2 61.4 52.4 53.6 62.162.0 Vehicle Noise:72.9 71.1 68.5 63.3 72.471.9 Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 71.8 69.9 68.1 62.1 71.370.7 64.2 62.8 62.6 56.3 54.7 63.463.2 61.4 52.4 53.6 62.162.0 Vehicle Noise:72.9 71.1 68.5 63.3 72.471.9 77.62 82.14 69.34 Road Grade:1.0% feet Thursday, May 9, 2024 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA Project Name:Maple Apartmets Job Number:15975 Analyst:N. JohnsonLot No:South Building #6 Road Name:Foothill Blvd. Scenario:Second Floor With Wall 34,000 10% 43.0 NOISE MODEL INPUTS Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume:3,400 vehicles Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 85.0Centerline Dist. to Observer: Highway Data feet feet vehicles Road Elevation:0.0 Barrier Elevation:0.0 Pad Elevation:3.0 Site Data Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15 Autos:15 Vehicle Mix feet feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Barrier Height:0.0 Observer Height (Above Pad):14.0 feet feet 45 mphVehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance:60 feet REMEL Traffic Flow Distance 3.35 VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.00% 84.8%4.9%10.3%2.40% 86.5%2.7%10.8%0.60% 0.01 Finite Road -1.20 Barrier Atten FHWA Noise Model Calculations 42.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0 0.000 0.000 Fresnel Berm Atten Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType -12.72 0.14 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -18.74 0.30 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -0.73 -1.84 -4.74 Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:0.00 2.97 8.01 49.132 48.185 46.967 Grade Adjustment:0.0 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 71.5 69.6 67.8 61.8 71.070.4 63.8 62.5 62.3 56.0 54.4 63.162.9 61.1 52.0 53.3 61.861.7 Vehicle Noise:72.6 70.8 68.2 63.0 72.171.6 Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 71.5 69.6 67.8 61.8 71.070.4 63.8 62.5 62.3 56.0 54.4 63.162.9 61.1 52.0 53.3 61.861.7 Vehicle Noise:72.6 70.8 68.2 63.0 72.171.6 77.62 82.14 69.34 Road Grade:1.0% feet Thursday, May 9, 2024 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA Project Name:Maple Apartmets Job Number:15975 Analyst:N. JohnsonLot No:East Building #3 Road Name:Maple Ave. Scenario:Third Floor With Wall 10,400 10% 32.0 NOISE MODEL INPUTS Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume:1,040 vehicles Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 65.0Centerline Dist. to Observer: Highway Data feet feet vehicles Road Elevation:0.0 Barrier Elevation:0.0 Pad Elevation:0.0 Site Data Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15 Autos:15 Vehicle Mix feet feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Barrier Height:0.0 Observer Height (Above Pad):23.0 feet feet 35 mphVehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance:12 feet REMEL Traffic Flow Distance -0.69 VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42% 84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84% 86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74% -1.61 Finite Road -1.20 Barrier Atten FHWA Noise Model Calculations 33.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0 0.000 0.000 Fresnel Berm Atten Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType -17.93 -1.53 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -21.88 -1.35 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -2.84 -3.72 -6.41 Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:0.00 2.30 8.01 63.040 62.238 60.579 Grade Adjustment:0.0 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 61.6 59.7 57.9 51.9 61.160.5 54.2 55.6 52.7 46.3 44.8 53.553.2 54.2 45.2 46.4 54.954.8 Vehicle Noise:63.2 61.4 58.4 53.6 62.662.1 Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 61.6 59.7 57.9 51.9 61.160.5 54.2 55.6 52.7 46.3 44.8 53.553.2 54.2 45.2 46.4 54.954.8 Vehicle Noise:63.2 61.4 58.4 53.6 62.662.1 74.83 80.05 65.11 Road Grade:1.0% feet Thursday, May 9, 2024 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA Project Name:Maple Apartmets Job Number:15975 Analyst:N. JohnsonLot No:East Building #4 Road Name:Maple Ave. Scenario:Third Floor With Wall 10,400 10% 29.0 NOISE MODEL INPUTS Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume:1,040 vehicles Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 66.0Centerline Dist. to Observer: Highway Data feet feet vehicles Road Elevation:0.0 Barrier Elevation:0.0 Pad Elevation:0.0 Site Data Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15 Autos:15 Vehicle Mix feet feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Barrier Height:0.0 Observer Height (Above Pad):23.0 feet feet 35 mphVehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance:12 feet REMEL Traffic Flow Distance -0.69 VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42% 84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84% 86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74% -1.71 Finite Road -1.20 Barrier Atten FHWA Noise Model Calculations 37.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0 0.000 0.000 Fresnel Berm Atten Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType -17.93 -1.63 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -21.88 -1.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -2.26 -3.14 -5.94 Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:0.00 2.30 8.01 63.977 63.187 61.553 Grade Adjustment:0.0 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 61.5 59.6 57.8 51.8 61.060.4 54.1 55.5 52.6 46.2 44.7 53.453.1 54.1 45.0 46.3 54.854.7 Vehicle Noise:63.1 61.3 58.3 53.5 62.562.0 Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 61.5 59.6 57.8 51.8 61.060.4 54.1 55.5 52.6 46.2 44.7 53.453.1 54.1 45.0 46.3 54.854.7 Vehicle Noise:63.1 61.3 58.3 53.5 62.562.0 74.83 80.05 65.11 Road Grade:1.0% feet Thursday, May 9, 2024 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA Project Name:Maple Apartmets Job Number:15975 Analyst:N. JohnsonLot No:South Building #5 Road Name:Foothill Blvd. Scenario:Third Floor With Wall 34,000 10% 41.0 NOISE MODEL INPUTS Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume:3,400 vehicles Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 83.0Centerline Dist. to Observer: Highway Data feet feet vehicles Road Elevation:0.0 Barrier Elevation:0.0 Pad Elevation:3.0 Site Data Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15 Autos:15 Vehicle Mix feet feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Barrier Height:0.0 Observer Height (Above Pad):23.0 feet feet 45 mphVehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance:60 feet REMEL Traffic Flow Distance 3.35 VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.00% 84.8%4.9%10.3%2.40% 86.5%2.7%10.8%0.60% -0.21 Finite Road -1.20 Barrier Atten FHWA Noise Model Calculations 42.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0 0.000 0.000 Fresnel Berm Atten Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType -12.72 -0.02 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -18.74 0.26 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -1.33 -2.94 -6.88 Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:0.00 2.97 8.01 50.843 49.390 47.252 Grade Adjustment:0.0 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 71.3 69.4 67.6 61.6 70.870.2 63.7 62.5 62.2 55.8 54.3 63.062.7 61.0 52.0 53.3 61.761.6 Vehicle Noise:72.4 70.6 68.0 62.8 71.971.4 Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 71.3 69.4 67.6 61.6 70.870.2 63.7 62.5 62.2 55.8 54.3 63.062.7 61.0 52.0 53.3 61.761.6 Vehicle Noise:72.4 70.6 68.0 62.8 71.971.4 77.62 82.14 69.34 Road Grade:1.0% feet Thursday, May 9, 2024 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA Project Name:Maple Apartmets Job Number:15975 Analyst:N. JohnsonLot No:South Building #6 Road Name:Foothill Blvd. Scenario:Third Floor With Wall 34,000 10% 43.0 NOISE MODEL INPUTS Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume:3,400 vehicles Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 85.0Centerline Dist. to Observer: Highway Data feet feet vehicles Road Elevation:0.0 Barrier Elevation:0.0 Pad Elevation:3.0 Site Data Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15 Autos:15 Vehicle Mix feet feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Barrier Height:0.0 Observer Height (Above Pad):23.0 feet feet 45 mphVehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance:60 feet REMEL Traffic Flow Distance 3.35 VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.00% 84.8%4.9%10.3%2.40% 86.5%2.7%10.8%0.60% -0.47 Finite Road -1.20 Barrier Atten FHWA Noise Model Calculations 42.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0 0.000 0.000 Fresnel Berm Atten Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType -12.72 -0.30 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -18.74 -0.04 -1.20 0.000 0.000 -1.53 -3.04 -6.65 Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos:0.00 2.97 8.01 52.924 51.530 49.485 Grade Adjustment:0.0 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 71.0 69.1 67.4 61.3 70.569.9 63.4 62.2 61.9 55.5 54.0 62.762.4 60.7 51.7 53.0 61.461.3 Vehicle Noise:72.2 70.4 67.7 62.5 71.671.1 Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation) Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Autos: VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn 71.0 69.1 67.4 61.3 70.569.9 63.4 62.2 61.9 55.5 54.0 62.762.4 60.7 51.7 53.0 61.461.3 Vehicle Noise:72.2 70.4 67.7 62.5 71.671.1 77.62 82.14 69.34 Road Grade:1.0% feet Thursday, May 9, 2024 Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx APPENDIX 10.1: HVAC Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx This page was intentionally left blank. 1 50VR---A Performancet 15 SEER 2---Stage Packaged Heat Pump System with PuronR (R---410A) Refrigerant Single and Three Phase 2 to 5 Nominal Tons (Sizes 24---60) Product Data A09033 Fig. 1 -- Unit 50VR--A Single--Packaged Products with Energy--Saving Features and PuronR refrigerant. S 15.0--15.5 SEER / 12.0--12.5 EER at 95_F (35_C) OD S Factory--Installed TXV S Multi--speed ECM Blower Motor -- Standard S Sound levels as low as 71dBA S Two Stages of Cooling/Heating S Dehumidification Feature FEATURES/BENEFITS One--piece heat pump unit with optional electric heater, low sound levels, easy installation, low maintenance, and dependable performance. Puron Environmentally Sound Refrigerant is Carrier’s unique refrigerant designed to help protect the environment. Puron is an HFC refrigerant which does not contain chlorine that can harm the ozone layer. Puron refrigerant is in service in millions of systems proving highly reliable, environmentally sound performance. Easy Installation Factory--assembled package is a compact, fully self--contained, electric cooling unit that is prewired, pre--piped, and pre--charged for minimum installation expense. These units are available in a variety of standard cooling sizes with voltage options to meet residential and light commercial requirements. Units are lightweight and install easily on a rooftop or at ground level. The high tech composite base eliminates rust problems associated with ground level applications. Innovative Unit Base Design On the inside a high--tech composite material will not rust and incorporates a sloped drain pan which improves drainage and helps inhibit mold, algae and bacterial growth. On the outside metal base rails provide added stability as well as easier handling and rigging. Convertible duct configuration Unit is designed for use in either downflow or horizontal applications. Each unit is converted from horizontal to downflow and includes horizontal duct covers. Downflow operation is provided in the field to allow vertical ductwork connections. The basepan seals on the bottom openings to ensure a positive seal in the vertical airflow mode. Efficient operation High--efficiency design offers SEER (Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratios) of up to 15.5 and HSPF of 8.5. (See page 4.) Durable, dependable components Scroll Compressors have 2 stages of cooling/heating and are designed for high efficiency. Each compressor is hermetically sealed against contamination to help promote longer life and dependable operation. Each compressor also has vibration isolation to provide quieter operation. All compressors have internal high pressure and overcurrent protection. Multi--speed ECM Blower Motor is standard on all 50VR--A. Direct--drive PSC (Permanent Split Capacitor) condenser--fan motors are designed to help reduce energy consumption and provide for cooing operation down to 40_F (4.4_C) outdoor temperature. Motormasterr II low ambient kit is available as a field--installed accessory. Thermostatic Expansion Valve -- A hard shutoff, balance port TXV maintains a constant superheat at the evaporator exit (cooling cycle) resulting in higher overall system efficiency. Refrigerant system is designed to provide dependability. Liquid filter driers are used to promote clean, unrestricted operation. Each unit leaves the factory with a full refrigerant charge. Refrigerant service connections make checking operating pressures easier. High and Low Pressure Switches provide added reliability for the compressor. Indoor and Outdoor coils are computer--designed for optimum heat transfer and efficiency. The indoor coil is fabricated from copper tube and aluminum fins and is located inside the unit for protection against damage. The outdoor coil is internally mounted on the top tier of the unit. Low sound ratings ensure a quiet indoor and outdoor environment with sound ratings as low as 71dBA. (See Page 4.) Easy to service cabinets provide easy 3 panel accessibility to serviceable components during maintenance and installation. The basepan with integrated drain pan provides easy ground level installation with a mounting pad. A nesting feature ensures a positive basepan to roof curb seal when the unit is roof mounted. A convenient 3/4--in. (19.05 mm) wide perimeter flange makes frame mounting on a rooftop easy. 2 Dehumidification Feature This unit has independent fan speeds for low stage cooling and high stage cooling. In addition, 208/230 VAC models have the field--selectable capability to run an enhanced dehumidification (’DHUM’) speed on high stage cooling (as low as 320CFM per ton). Coupled with the improved dehumidification associated with low stage cooling, the DHUM speed allows for a complete dehumidification solution independent of cooling stage. The dehumidification control must open the control circuit on humidity rise above the dehumidification set point. NOTE: The enhanced dehumidification feature on high stage cooling does not support use of an economizer. Standard horizontal metal duct covers with insulation come with the unit and cover the horizontal duct openings. These can be left in place if the units are converted to downflow. Cabinets are constructed of heavyduty, phosphated, zinc--coated prepainted steel capable of withstanding 500 hours in salt spray. Interior surfaces of the evaporator/electric heater compartment are insulated with foil--faced insulation, which keeps the conditioned air from being affected by the outdoor ambient temperature and provides improved indoor air quality. (Conforms to American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers No. 62P.) The sloped drain pan minimizes standing water in the drain. An external drain is provided. Short--Cycling protection for the compressor is incorporated into our defrost control board ensuring a five minute delay (+/--2 minutes) before restarting compressor after shutdown for any reason. TABLE OF CONTENTS FEATURES/BENEFITS 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MODEL NUMBER NOMENCLATURE 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AHRI CAPACITIES 4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PHYSICAL DATA 5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OPTIONS AND ACCESSORIES 6. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BASE UNIT DIMENSIONS 7--8. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ROOF CURB ACCESSORY 9. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SELECTION PROCEDURE 10. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PERFORMANCE DATA 11--35. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TYPICAL PIPING AND WIRING 41. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . APPLICATION DATA 42. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ELECTRICAL DATA 43--44. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TYPICAL WIRING SCHEMATICS 45--50. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CONTROLS 51. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS 52--54. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .50 V R - - A 3 MODEL NUMBER NOMENCLATURE 50VR --- ------ --- --- Type of Unit50VR --- Single PackagedAir ConditionerSystem Nominal Cooling Capacity24 --- 2.0 Tons30 --- 2.5 Tons36 --- 3.0 Tons42 --- 3.5 Tons48 --- 4.0 Tons60 --- 5.0 Tons 24 N/A Electrical Supply3 --- 208/230---1---605 --- 208/230---3---606 --- 460---3---60 3 0 Minor Series Options TF --- Filter RackTP --- Base unit with tin plated indoor coil hairpins(Single Phase Only) See Price Page for full list of factory options.Only used if ordering an option --- N/A A Major Series Use of the AHRI Certified TM Mark indicates a manufacturer’s participation in the program For verification of certification for individual products, go to www.ahridirectory.org. 50 V R - - A c@us LISTED ENERGY STAR ISHIIAE COMPllANT 4 AHRI* CAPACITIES Cooling Capacities and Efficiencies Unit Model 50VR-A Nominal Tons Standard CFM (High / Low Stage) Net Cooling Capacities - Btuh (High Stage) EER @A**SEER† 24 2 850 / 650 23000 12.0 15.0 30 2-1/2 1000 / 750 30000 12.0 15.0 36 3 1200 / 900 34000 12.0 15.0 42 3-1/2 1400 / 1050 42000 12.0 15.0 48 4 1600 / 1200 47500 12.5 15.5 60 5 1750 / 1200 57000 12.0 15.0 Heat Pump Heating Capacities and Efficiencies Unit Model 50VR-A Heating Capacity (BTUH) @ 47_F (8.3_C) COP @ 47_F (8.3_C) Heating Capacity (BTUH) @ 17_F ( ---8.3_C) COP @ 17_F ( ---8.3_C)HSPF Heating Cd 24 23,000 3.8 11200 2.2 8.0 0.25 30 29,000 3.8 15400 2.3 8.0 0.25 36 34,000 3.7 17200 2.3 8.0 0.25 42 42,000 3.6 24000 2.5 8.0 0.25 48 47,000 3.7 26000 2.3 8.0 0.25 60 57,000 3.5 32400 2.4 8.5 0.25 LEGEND dB---Sound Levels (decibels) db—Dry Bulb SEER—Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio wb—Wet Bulb COP ---Coefficient of Performance * Air Conditioning, Heating & Refrigeration Institute. **At “A” conditions---80_F (26.7_C) indoor db/67_F (19.4_C) indoor wb & 95_F (35_C) outdoor db. {Rated in accordance with U.S. Government DOE Department of Energy) test procedures and/or AHRI Standards 210/240. Notes: 1. Ratings are net values, reflecting the effects of circulating fan heat. Ratings are based on: Cooling Standard:80qF (26.7_C) db, 67qF wb (19.4_C) indoor entering---air temperature and 95qF db (35_C) outdoor entering---air temperature. 2. Before purchasing this appliance, read important energy cost and effi- ciency information available from AHRIdirectory.org. A--WEIGHTED SOUND POWER LEVEL (dBA) Model 50VR-A Sound Ratings (dBA) TYPICAL OCTAVE BAND SPECTRUM(dBA without tone adjustment) 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 24 73 58.5 65 66.5 67 62 57.5 54.5 30 76 59 63 69 70 63.5 59 53.5 36 73 64 63.5 68 68 65.5 60.5 52.5 42 71 64 62 65 66 63.5 59.5 52.5 48 74 59.5 65 70 67 64.5 60.5 52.5 60 73 68 63 66 66 65 59.5 52.5 NOTE: Tested in accordance with AHRI Standard 270 (not listed in AHRI). 50 V R - - A 5 PHYSICAL DATA UNIT SIZE 24 30 36 42 48 60 NOMINAL CAPACITY (ton)2 2---1/2 3 3---1/2 4 5 SHIPPING WEIGHT lb. SHIPPING WEIGHT (kg) 356 162 364 165 420 191 466 212 462 210 511 232 COMPRESSORS Quantity Scroll 1 REFRIGERANT (R---410A) Quantity lb Quantity (kg) 9.0 4.1 10.0 4.5 11.0 5.0 14.6 6.6 12.0 5.4 14.8 6.7 REFRIGERANT METERING DEVICE TXV, Indoor TXV ORIFICE ID (in.) ID (mm) .032 (2) 0.81 (2) .040 (2) 1.02 (2) .042 (2) 1.07 (2) .042 (2) 1.07 (2) .042 (2) 1.07 (2) .052 (2) 1.32 (2) OUTDOOR COIL Rows...Fins/in. Face Area (sq ft) 2...21 13.6 2...21 15.3 2...21 13.6 2...21 19.4 2...21 17.5 2...21 23.3 OUTDOOR FAN Nominal Cfm Diameter in. Diameter (mm) Motor Hp (Rpm) 2100 24 609.6 1/12 (800) 2500 24 609.6 1/8 (810) 3000 26 660.4 1/5 (810) 3000 26 660.4 1/5 (810) 3300 26 660.4 1/5 (810) 3600 26 660.4 1/5 (810) INDOOR COIL Rows...Fins/in. Face Area (sq ft) 3...17 3.7 3...17 3.7 3...17 4.7 3...17 4.7 3...17 5.7 4...17 5.7 INDOOR BLOWER Nominal Low Stage Cooling Airflow (Cfm) Nominal High Stage Cooling Airflow (Cfm) Size in. Size (mm.) Motor HP (RPM) 5 850 10x10 254x254 1/2 (1050) 75 1000 10x10 254x254 1/2 (1050) 1200 11x10 279.4x254 3/4 (1000) 5 1400 11x10 279.4x254 3/4 (1075) 1600 11x10 279.4x254 1.0 (1075) 4 1750 11x10 279.4x254 1.0 (1075) HIGH---PRESSURE SWITCH (psig) Cut---out Reset (Auto) 650 +/--- 15 420 +/--- 25 LOW---PRESSURE SWITCH (psig) cut---out Reset (auto) 20 +/--- 5 45 +/--- 5 RETURN---AIR FILTERS†} Throwaway Size in. Throwaway Size (mm) 20x20x1 508x508x25 20x24x1 508x610x25 24x30x1 610x762x25 24x36x1 610x914x25 {Required filter sizes shown are based on the larger of the AHRI (Air Conditioning Heating and Refrigeration Institute) rated cooling airflow or the heating air- flow velocity of 300 ft/minute for throwaway type or 450 ft/minute for high---capacity type. Air filter pressure drop for non---standard filters must not exceed 0.08 in. W.C. }If using accessory filter rack refer to the filter rack installation instructions for correct filter sizes and quantity. Electric Heat Pressure Drop Tables (IN. W.C.) Small Cabinet: 24--30 STATIC STANDARDCFM (SCFM) 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 5 kW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.07 10 kW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.10 0.11 15 kW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 20 kW 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.09 0.11 0.13 0.15 0.17 0.19 Large Cabinet: 36--60 STATIC STANDARDCFM (SCFM) 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 5 kW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12 10 kW 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 15 kW 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.15 20 kW 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.16 50 V R - - A 6 OPTIONS AND ACCESSORIES ITEM DESCRIPTION FACTORY INSTALLED OPTION FIELD INSTALLED ACCESSORY Coil Options Base unit with tin plated indoor coil hairpins X Compressor Start Kit Compressor Start Kit assists compressor start---up by providing addi- tional starting torque on sing phase units only.X Corporate Thermostats Thermostats provide control for the system heating and cooling func- tions.X Crankcase Heater Crankcase Heater provides anti---floodback protection for low---load cooling applications.X* Economizer Vertical Economizer with Jade Honeywell W7220 Controller, Honeywell communicating actuator, and dry bulb sensor. (Contact MicroMetl Cus- tomer Service at 1---800---662---4822 to order.) X Horizontal Economizer with Jade Honeywell W7220 Controller, Honey- well communicating actuator, and dry bulb sensor. (Contact MicroMetl Customer Service at 1---800---662---4822 to order.) X Electric Heaters Electric Heat Supplement X Filter Rack Filter Rack features easy installation, serviceability, and high---filtering performance for vertical applications. Includes 1---in. filter.X X Flat Roof Curbs Flat Roof Curbs in both 11---in (279 mm) and 14---in. (356 mm) sizes are available for roof mounted applications.X Low Ambient Kit Low Ambient Kit (Motormaster II Control) allows the use of mechanical cooling down to outdoor temperatures as low as 0°F (---18° C) when properly installed. X Manual Outside Air Damper Manual Outside Air Damper includes hood and filter rack with adjustable damper blade for up to 25% outdoor air.X Square---to---Round Duct Transition Kit Square---to---Round Duct Transition Kit enable 24---48 size units to be fitted to 14 in (356 mm). round ductwork.X Time Guard II Automatically prevents the compressor from restarting for at least 4 minutes and 45 seconds after shutdown of the compressor. Not required when a corporate programmable thermostat is applied or with a RTU--- MP control. X Dual Point Electric Heaters Allows you to power the electric heater and unit contactor separately by having two individual field power supply circuits connected respectively.X *Refer to Price Page for application detail. Electric Heaters CATALOG ORDERING NO. NOMINAL CAPACITY (kW) FUSE QTY USED WITH SIZES 24 30 36 42 48 60 ELECTRIC HEATERS (208/230 — SINGLE PHASE — 60 Hz) CPHEATER052A00 5.0 ---X X X CPHEATER064A00 5.0 4 X X X X X X CPHEATER069A00 7.2 ---X CPHEATER070A00 7.2 4 X X X X X X CPHEATER050A00 10.0 4 X X X X X X CPHEATER066A00 15.0 4 X X X X X CPHEATER054A00 20.0 6 X X X ELECTRIC HEATERS (208/230 — THREE PHASE — 60 Hz) CPHEATER055A00 5.0 ---X X X X X CPHEATER056A00 10.0 ---X X X X CPHEATER068A00 10.0 6 X X X X X CPHEATER058A00 20.0 6 X X X X X CPHEATER059A01 20.0 6 X X X ELECTRIC HEATERS (460 — THREE PHASE — 60 Hz) CPHEATER061A00 10.0 ---X X X X CPHEATER062A00 15.0 ---X X X X CPHEATER063A00 20.0 ---X X X NOTE:Electric heaters are rated at 240v. Refer to Multiplication Factors table for other voltages. X = Approved combinations. Minimum Airflow for Safe Electric Heater Operation (CFM) SIZE 24 30 36 42 48 60 Cfm 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1750 50 V R - - A 7 UN I T D I M E N S I O N S - - 5 0 V R - - A 2 4 - - 3 0 A1 3 1 7 2 50VR--A UNIT ELECTRICAL UNIT WT. UNIT HEIGHT IN/MM CENTER OF GRAVITY IN/MM CHARACTERISTICS LB KG II A II 50VR-A24---30 208/230-1 348 15 7. 9 44-118 I 50VR-A30---(3/5l0 208/230-1, 208/230-3-60 356 161. 5 46-118 I UNIT VOLTAGE CORNER WEIGHT LB/KG 11111 II 2 II II 311 11411 50VR-A24---30 208/230 41.8123.7 55.7131.6 83.5147.4 139.2155.2 50VR-A30---(3,5l0 208/230 42. 7 I 24.2 57.0 I 32.3 85.4148.4 142.4 I 56.5 NOTE: ALL TABLE DATA RELEVANT FOR ALL FACTORY INSTALLED OPTIONS EXCEPT ECONOMIZER 2-3/.4 [69.91 15-15/16 [404.81 l OUTDOOR COIL 31-3/16 [791.11 LOUVER PANEL 9-151161.11-9/1619-15/16 [252.41 [547.71 [252.41 tsV1~7 r-. .. [] I I RETURN .. SUPPLY ~ ll,'1"· 1 1,om 1h I RETU II I AIR : : OP • ~ INDOOR COIL UTDOOR COIL 1 [25.4] .,. TOP VIEW !' .. ..... -----46-13/16--------i [1189.01 LOUVER PANEL -tzG----+--------tt-----. ·z· 3-5/8 'I ~ j [91.11 fo',----------,~ X y z 1121 20-112 I 520.1 15-314 I 400.1 16-5/8 I 422.3 11 72 20-112 I 520.1 15-3/4 I 400.1 11-318 I 441.3 REQUIRED CLEARANCES TO COMBUSTIBLE MATL. INCHES [MMl TOP OF UNIT ............................................. 14 [355.6] DUCT SIDE OF UNIT ........................................ 2 [50 8l SIDE OPPOSITE DUCTS ..................................... 14 [355.6] BOTTOM OF UNIT ........................................... 0 [0.0l ELECTRICAL PANEL ........................................ 36 [914.4] NEC. REQUIRED CLEARANCES. lNCHES [MMl BETWEEN UNITS, POWER ENTRY SIDE ........................ 42 [1066.8] UNIT AND UNGROUNDED SURFACES, POWER ENTRY SIDE ......... 36 [914.0l UNIT AND BLOCK OR CONCRETE WALLS AND OTHER GROUNDED SURFACES, POWER ENTRY SlDE .................... 42 [1066.8] REQUIRED CLEARANCE FOR OPERATION AND SERVICING INCHES [MMl EVAP. COlL ACCESS SIDE .................................. 36 [914.0l POWER ENTRY SIDE ........................................ 42 [1066.8] (EXCEPT FOR NEC REQUIREMENTS) UNIT TOP ................................................ 48 [1219.2] SIDE OPPOSITE DUCTS ..................................... 36 [914.0l DUCT PANEL .............................................. 12 [304.8l• •MINIMUM DISTANCES: IF UNIT IS PLACED LESS THAN 12 [304.8] FROM WALL 7-1/4 12-13/16 [184.21 [325.-41 SYSTEM, THEN SYSTEM PERFORMANCE MAYBE COMPROMISED. LOUVER PANEL c=i;;;_ DIMENSIONS lN [l ARE IN MILLIMETERS 15-7/8 [403.21 SUPPLY DUCT •I OPENING I• LOUVER PANEL RETURN DUCT •I OPENING I• , [19 OJN.P.T. DRAINOUTLETL ,';i8· [11.0 1 om ,1-518 --------1 COMPRESSOR PANEL ELECTRICAL ACCESS PANEL 3/16 [-4.81 [828.71 LEFT SIDE VIEW ,__ ______ 48-3/16 -------< [122-4.01 FRONT VIEW 7/8 [22.21 DIA. HOLE CONTROL ENTRY RIGHT SIDE VIEW 9-7/8 [150.81 50VR500140 21-5/8 [5.49.31 REAR VIEW CJ 9-7/8 [150.81 8 50 V R - - A 3 6 - - 6 0 U N I T D I M E N S I O N S A1 3 1 7 3 50VR--A 3-1/16 [81.31 [35-4.01 [3-.U.5] [354.01 .. .. UNIT 50VR A36 --13/5/610 50VR A42 --13/5/610 50VR A48 --13/5/610 50VR A60 --13/5/610 UN IT 50VR A36 --13/5/610 50VR A42 --13/5/610 50VR A48 --13/5/610 50VR A60 --13/5/610 ELECTRICAL UNIT WT. UNIT HEIGHT IN/MM CHARACTER IS TICS LB KG "A" 208/230-1, 208/230 3-60, 460-3 41 3 187 3 44 3/4 1137 208/230-1, 208/230-3-60, 460-3 444 201 . 4 50 3/4 1289 208/230-1, 208/230 3-60, 460-3 447 202 8 48 3/4 1238 208/230-1, 208/230 3-60, 460-3 503 2 28. 2 54 3/4 1 391 VOLTAGE CORNER WEIGHTS LB/KG "1" "2" ''3" 'T 208/230/ 460 4 9 6 28 1 6 6 1 3 7 5 99 1 56 2 165 2 6 5 6 208/230/ 460 53. 3 30. 2 71. 0 40. 3 106.6 6 0. 4 177.6 7 0. 5 208/230/ 460 53. 6 30. 4 71. 5 40. 6 107. 3 60.8 178.8 71. 0 208/230/ 460 6 0. 4 34. 2 80. 5 45. 6 1 20. 7 68. 4 201 . 2 7 9. 9 CENTER OF GRAVITY IN/MM X y z 20-1 / 4 514 4 17-1/2 444. 5 17-5/ 8 447 7 20-1 / 4 514 4 17-1/2 444. 5 1 7-5/ 8 447. 7 20-1 / 4 514 4 17-1/2 444. 5 17-5/ 8 44 7 7 20-1 / 4 514 4 17-1/2 444. 5 18 457. 2 13-15/16T13-9/16T13-15/16 RETURN .. SUPPLY NOTE: ALL TABLE DATA RELEVANT FOR ALL FACTORY INSTALLED 2-13/16 [71.4] [] ✓, -===----- ,f:PTION "I RETU 15-15116 [404.81 OUTDOOR COIL :: A " ~ INDOOR COIL r-•1-15116~ I -----[1090.61 ---I LOUVER PANEL ·O DRAIN OUTLET 3/-4' [19.11 N.P.T X 7/8' [22.21 DEEP ,__ _____ .U-3/16-----~ [1122.-41 LEFT SIDE VIEW .. TOP VIEW .. 1 [50.81 3-11/16 [93.71 'A" COMPRESSOR· PANEL [l] OPTIONS EXCEPT ECONOMIZER REQUIRED CLEARANCES TO COMBUSTIBLE MATL OPTIONA~•1:· PPLY : ' ' ' ' ' ' t ' ,, ,,. ,,, ,,, it -' ' " " ~ ,, =====1? - ~ UTDOOR COIL t-------,1--------< [1193.81 1· ·x· LOUVER PANEL c*----+--1-tl--------r 48-1/4 [1225.51 FRONT VIEW ELECTRICAL ACCESS PANEL 1-3/-4" [-4-4.51 DIA. K.O. POWER SUPPLY 1-4-13/16 [376.21 TOP OF UNIT DUCT SIDE OF UNIT. SIDE OPPOSITE DUCTS BOTTOM OF UN IT. ELECTRICAL PANEL. NEC. REQUIRED CLEARANCES. BETWEEN UNITS, POWER ENTRY SIDE UNIT AND UNGROUNDED SURFACES, POWER ENTRY SIDE UNIT AND BLOCK OR CONCRETE WALLS AND OTHER GROUNDED SURFACES, POWER ENTRY SIDE. REQUIRED CLEARANCE FOR OPERATION AND SERVICING EVAP COIL ACCESS SIDE POWER ENTRY SIDE. !EXCEPT FOR NEC REQUIREMENTS! UNIT TOP SIDE OPPOSITE DUCTS DUCT PANEL. INCHES IMMI .14 1355 61 2 I 50 8 I 14 1355 61 . 0 IO O I . 36 I 91 4 41 INCHES IMMI 42 11066 8 I 36 1914 01 . 42 11066 81 INCHES IMM 36 1914 01 . ..... 42 11066. 81 48 11 21 9 21 36 1914 01 .12 1304.81• •MINIMUM DISTANCES.IF UNIT IS PLACED LESS THAN 12 1304.81 FROM WALL L SYSTEM.THEN SYSTEM PERFORMANCE MAYBE COMPROMISED DIMENSIONS IN II ARE IN MM LOUVER PANEL -C=::J 7/8' [22.21 DIA. HOLE CONTROL ENTRY 3/16 [-4.81 RIGHT SIDE VIEW O· 15-718 [-403.21 SUPPLY DUCT OPENING 13-718 [352.-41 LOUVER PANEL 13-5/8 [3-46.11 REAR VIEW RETURN DUCT OPENlNG 13-718 [352.-41 50VR500141 9 ROOF CURB ACCESSORY -- 50VR--A24--60 RETURN AIR SMALL BASE UNIT SUPPLY AIR LARGE BASE UNIT UNIT PLACEMENT ON COMMON CURB LARGE CURB SMALL OR LARGE BASE UNIT SMALL/COMMON CURB ROOF CURB DETAIL Wood nailer* Roofcurb* Insulation (field supplied) *Provided with roofcurb Cant strip field supplied Roofing material field supplied Flashing field supplied HVAC unit base rails Roofcurb Sealing Gasket HVAC unit basepan Anchor screw A09090 A09413 A09094 A09415 C B A F D E Dashed lines show cross support location for large basepan units. G H C B AF D E G H A09414 UNIT SIZE CATALOG NUMBER A IN. (mm) B (small/common base) IN. (mm)* B (large base) IN. (mm)* C IN. (mm) D IN. (mm) E IN. (mm) F IN. (mm) G IN. (mm) H IN. (mm) Small or Large CPRFCURB010A00 11 (279)10 (254) 14 (356)16 (406) 47.8 (1214) 32.4 (822) 2.7 (69) 30.6 (778) 46.1 (1170) CPRFCURB011A00 14 (356) Large CPRFCURB012A00 11 (279)14 (356)43.9 (1116)42.2 (1072) CPRFCURB013A00 14 (356) * Part Numbers CPRCURB010A00 and CPRCURB011A00 can be used on both small and large basepan units. The cross supports must be located based on whether the unit is a small basepan or a large basepan. NOTES: 1. Roof curb must be set up for unit being installed. 2. Seal strip must be applied, as required, to unit being installed. 3. Roof curb is made of 16--gauge steel. 4. Attach ductwork to curb (flanges of duct rest on curb). 5. Insulated panels: 1--in. (25.4 mm) thick fiberglass 1 lb. density. 50 V R - - A i I I I I I I I I I I I I I :✓ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~! I I I I I I I - I c.._ - I 10 SELECTION PROCEDURE (WITH EXAMPLE) 1. Determine cooling and heating requirements at design conditions: Given: Required Cooling Capacity (TC) 34,000 Btuh. . . . . . . . . . Sensible Heat Capacity (SHC) 24,000 Btuh. . . . . . . . . . . . Required Heating Capacity 12,500 Btuh. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Condenser Entering Air Temperature 95qF(35qC). . . . . . . . Indoor--Air Temperature 80qF (26qC) edb. . . . . . . . . . . . . 67qF (19qC) ewb Evaporator Air Quantity 1200 CFM. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . External Static Pressure 0.20 IN. W.C.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Electrical Characteristics 230--1--60. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. Select unit based on required cooling capacity. Enter Net Cooling Capacities table at condenser entering temperature of 95qF (35qC), indoor air entering at 1200 cfm and 67qF (19qC) ewb (entering wet bulb). The unit will provide a total capacity of 34,200 Btuh and a SHC of 24,500 Btuh. 3. Select electric heat. The required heating capacity is 15,000 Btuh. Determine additional electric heat capacity in kW. 15,000 Btuh = 4.4kW of heat required 3,414 Btuh/kW Enter the electric Heater Packages table for 208/240, single--phase, 50VR--A36 unit. The 5 kW heater at 240v most closely satisfies the heating required. To calculate kW at the 208v, multiply the heater kW by multiplication factor 0.75 found in the Wattage Multiplication Factors table. 5 kW x 0.75 = 3.75 kW 3.75 kW x 3414 = 12802.50 Btuh 4. Determine fan speed and power requirements at design conditions. Before entering the air delivery tables, calculate the total static pressure required. From the given example, the Wet Coil Pressure Drop Table, and the Filter Pressure Drop Table: External Static Pressure 0.200 IN. W.C. Filter 0.000 IN. W.C. Wet Coil Pressure Drop 0.130 IN. W.C. Total Static Pressure 0.330 IN. W.C. Enter the table for Wet Coil Air Delivery—horizontal discharge, 230. At 0.33 IN. W.C. ESP (external static pressure) and medium speed, the fan will deliver 1293 cfm. Adjusting for 208v, the motor delivers 114 cfm (deduct 10%). 5. Select unit that corresponds to power source available. The Electrical Data Table shows that the unit is designed to operate at 208--1--60. 50 V R - - A Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx APPENDIX 10.2: OPERATIONAL MODEL Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx This page was intentionally left blank. ϭϱϵϳϱͲDĂƉůĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ ĂĚŶĂEŽŝƐĞWƌĞĚŝĐƚŝŽŶDŽĚĞů͗ϭϱϵϳϱͲϬϮͺKƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶ͘ĐŶĂ ĂƚĞ͗ϭϱ͘Ϭϱ͘Ϯϰ ŶĂůLJƐƚ͗͘DĂĚĚƵdž ĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶŽŶĨŝŐƵƌĂƚŝŽŶ ŽŶĨŝŐƵƌĂƚŝŽŶ WĂƌĂŵĞƚĞƌ sĂůƵĞ 'ĞŶĞƌĂů DĂdž͘ ƌƌŽƌ;ĚͿ Ϭ͘ϬϬ DĂdž͘^ĞĂƌĐŚZĂĚŝƵƐ;η;hŶŝƚ͕> EͿͿ ϮϬϬϬ͘Ϭϭ DŝŶ͘ŝƐƚ^ƌĐƚŽZĐǀƌ Ϭ͘ϬϬ WĂƌƚŝƚŝŽŶ ZĂƐƚĞƌ&ĂĐƚŽƌ Ϭ͘ϱϬ DĂdž͘>ĞŶŐƚŚŽĨ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶ;η;hŶŝƚ͕> EͿͿ ϵϵϵ͘ϵϵ DŝŶ͘>ĞŶŐƚŚŽĨ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶ;η;hŶŝƚ͕> EͿͿ ϭ͘Ϭϭ DŝŶ͘>ĞŶŐƚŚŽĨ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶ;йͿ Ϭ͘ϬϬ WƌŽũ͘>ŝŶĞ^ŽƵƌĐĞƐ KŶ WƌŽũ͘ƌĞĂ^ŽƵƌĐĞƐ KŶ ZĞĨ͘dŝŵĞ ĂLJƚŝŵĞWĞŶĂůƚLJ;ĚͿ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ZĞĐƌ͘dŝŵĞWĞŶĂůƚLJ;ĚͿ ϱ͘ϬϬ EŝŐŚƚͲƚŝŵĞWĞŶĂůƚLJ;ĚͿ ϭϬ͘ϬϬ dD ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚ,ĞŝŐŚƚ;ŵͿ Ϭ͘ϬϬ DŽĚĞůŽĨdĞƌƌĂŝŶ dƌŝĂŶŐƵůĂƚŝŽŶ ZĞĨůĞĐƚŝŽŶ ŵĂdž͘KƌĚĞƌŽĨZĞĨůĞĐƚŝŽŶ Ϯ ^ĞĂƌĐŚZĂĚŝƵƐ^ƌĐ ϭϬϬ͘ϬϬ ^ĞĂƌĐŚZĂĚŝƵƐZĐǀƌ ϭϬϬ͘ϬϬ DĂdž͘ŝƐƚĂŶĐĞ^ŽƵƌĐĞͲZĐǀƌ ϭϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϭϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ DŝŶ͘ŝƐƚĂŶĐĞZǀĐƌͲZĞĨůĞĐƚŽƌ ϭ͘ϬϬϭ͘ϬϬ DŝŶ͘ŝƐƚĂŶĐĞ^ŽƵƌĐĞͲZĞĨůĞĐƚŽƌ Ϭ͘ϭϬ /ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů;/^KϵϲϭϯͿ >ĂƚĞƌĂůŝĨĨƌĂĐƚŝŽŶ ƐŽŵĞKďũ KďƐƚ͘ǁŝƚŚŝŶƌĞĂ^ƌĐĚŽŶŽƚƐŚŝĞůĚ KŶ ^ĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐ /ŶĐů͘'ƌŽƵŶĚƚƚ͘ŽǀĞƌĂƌƌŝĞƌ njǁŝƚŚůŝŵŝƚ;ϮϬͬϮϱͿ ĂƌƌŝĞƌŽĞĨĨŝĐŝĞŶƚƐϭ͕Ϯ͕ϯ ϯ͘ϬϮϬ͘ϬϬ͘Ϭ dĞŵƉĞƌĂƚƵƌĞ;η;hŶŝƚ͕d DWͿͿ ϭϬ ƌĞů͘,ƵŵŝĚŝƚLJ;йͿ ϳϬ 'ƌŽƵŶĚďƐŽƌƉƚŝŽŶ'Ϭ͘ϱϬ tŝŶĚ^ƉĞĞĚĨŽƌŝƌ͘;η;hŶŝƚ͕^W ͿͿ ϯ͘Ϭ ZŽĂĚƐ;dEDͿ ZĂŝůǁĂLJƐ;&dͬ&ZͿ ŝƌĐƌĂĨƚ;͍͍͍Ϳ ^ƚƌŝĐƚůLJĂĐĐ͘ƚŽnj ZĞĐĞŝǀĞƌEŽŝƐĞ>ĞǀĞůƐ EĂŵĞ D͘/>ĞǀĞů>ƌ >ŝŵŝƚ͘sĂůƵĞ >ĂŶĚhƐĞ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƐ ĂLJ EŝŐŚƚ E >ĂLJ EŝŐŚƚ E >dLJƉĞ ƵƚŽ EŽŝƐĞdLJƉĞ y z ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ Zϭ Zϭ ϰϵ͘ϴ ϰϵ͘ϰ ϱϲ͘ϭ Ϭ͘Ϭ Ϭ͘Ϭ Ϭ͘Ϭ dž dŽƚĂů ϱ͘ϬϬ Ă ϲϮϭϭϰϲϯ͘ϳϱ ϮϯϰϵϬϱϱ͘ϳϭ ϱ͘ϬϬ ZϮ ZϮ ϱϬ͘ϭ ϰϵ͘ϲ ϱϲ͘Ϯ Ϭ͘Ϭ Ϭ͘Ϭ Ϭ͘Ϭ dž dŽƚĂů ϱ͘ϬϬ Ă ϲϮϭϭϳϬϳ͘Ϯϰ ϮϯϰϵϬϱϴ͘ϯϭ ϱ͘ϬϬ Zϯ Zϯ ϰϱ͘ϰ ϰϰ͘ϰ ϱϬ͘ϵ Ϭ͘Ϭ Ϭ͘Ϭ Ϭ͘Ϭ dž dŽƚĂů ϱ͘ϬϬ Ă ϲϮϭϭϵϴϳ͘ϭϵ Ϯϯϰϴϴϵϰ͘Ϯϱ ϱ͘ϬϬ Zϰ Zϰ ϯϳ͘Ϯ ϯϰ͘ϳ ϰϭ͘ϰ Ϭ͘Ϭ Ϭ͘Ϭ Ϭ͘Ϭ dž dŽƚĂů ϱ͘ϬϬ Ă ϲϮϭϮϭϲϬ͘ϯϲ Ϯϯϰϴϭϳϴ͘ϭϬ ϱ͘ϬϬ Zϱ Zϱ ϯϳ͘Ϭ ϯϰ͘ϱ ϰϭ͘Ϯ Ϭ͘Ϭ Ϭ͘Ϭ Ϭ͘Ϭ dž dŽƚĂů ϱ͘ϬϬ Ă ϲϮϭϮϬϳϰ͘ϰϯ ϮϯϰϴϬϳϮ͘ϲϯ ϱ͘ϬϬ Zϲ Zϲ ϰϯ͘ϵ ϰϮ͘ϴ ϰϵ͘ϱ Ϭ͘Ϭ Ϭ͘Ϭ Ϭ͘Ϭ dž dŽƚĂů ϱ͘ϬϬ Ă ϲϮϭϭϱϱϮ͘Ϯϵ ϮϯϰϴϮϬϮ͘ϴϰ ϱ͘ϬϬ WŽŝŶƚ^ŽƵƌĐĞ;ƐͿ EĂŵĞ D͘/ZĞƐƵůƚ͘Wt>>ǁͬ>ŝ KƉĞƌĂƚŝŶŐdŝŵĞ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƐ ĂLJ ǀĞŶŝŶŐ EŝŐŚƚ dLJƉĞ sĂůƵĞ ŶŽƌŵ͘ĂLJ ^ƉĞĐŝĂů EŝŐŚƚ y z ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ Ě;Ϳ ;ŵŝŶͿ ;ŵŝŶͿ ;ŵŝŶͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ϬϬϭ ϬϬϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϮϱ͘ϬϮ ϮϯϰϴϴϱϬ͘ϴϲ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϬϮ ϬϬϮ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϮϰ͘ϴϰ Ϯϯϰϴϴϰϴ͘Ϯϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϬϯ ϬϬϯ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϮϰ͘ϴϰ Ϯϯϰϴϴϰϱ͘ϰϳ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϬϰ ϬϬϰ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϮϰ͘ϴϰ ϮϯϰϴϴϰϮ͘ϴϳ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϬϱ ϬϬϱ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϮϰ͘ϴϰ ϮϯϰϴϴϰϬ͘Ϯϲ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϬϲ ϬϬϲ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϮϰ͘ϴϰ Ϯϯϰϴϴϯϳ͘ϯϭ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϬϳ ϬϬϳ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϯϰ͘ϮϮ ϮϯϰϴϴϱϬ͘ϴϲ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϬϴ ϬϬϴ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϯϰ͘Ϭϱ Ϯϯϰϴϴϯϳ͘ϯϭ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϬϵ ϬϬϵ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϯϰ͘Ϭϱ Ϯϯϰϴϴϰϴ͘Ϯϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϭϬ ϬϭϬ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϯϰ͘Ϭϱ Ϯϯϰϴϴϰϱ͘ϰϳ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϭϭ Ϭϭϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϯϰ͘Ϭϱ ϮϯϰϴϴϰϮ͘ϴϳ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϭϮ ϬϭϮ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϯϰ͘Ϭϱ ϮϯϰϴϴϰϬ͘Ϯϲ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϭϯ Ϭϭϯ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϯϰ͘ϮϮ Ϯϯϰϴϳϱϴ͘ϯϮ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϭϰ Ϭϭϰ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϯϰ͘ϮϮ Ϯϯϰϴϳϱϱ͘ϳϮ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ hƌďĂŶƌŽƐƐƌŽĂĚƐ͕/ŶĐ͘ EĂŵĞ D͘/ZĞƐƵůƚ͘Wt>>ǁͬ>ŝ KƉĞƌĂƚŝŶŐdŝŵĞ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƐ ĂLJ ǀĞŶŝŶŐ EŝŐŚƚ dLJƉĞ sĂůƵĞ ŶŽƌŵ͘ĂLJ ^ƉĞĐŝĂů EŝŐŚƚ y z ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ Ě;Ϳ ;ŵŝŶͿ ;ŵŝŶͿ ;ŵŝŶͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ Ϭϭϱ Ϭϭϱ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϮϱ͘ϬϮ ϮϯϰϴϳϲϬ͘ϵϮ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϭϲ Ϭϭϲ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϯϰ͘ϮϮ ϮϯϰϴϳϱϮ͘ϳϲ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϭϳ Ϭϭϳ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϯϰ͘ϮϮ Ϯϯϰϴϳϲϯ͘ϳϬ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϭϴ Ϭϭϴ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϮϱ͘ϬϮ Ϯϯϰϴϳϲϯ͘ϳϬ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϭϵ Ϭϭϵ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϮϱ͘ϬϮ ϮϯϰϴϳϱϮ͘ϳϲ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϮϬ ϬϮϬ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϯϰ͘ϮϮ ϮϯϰϴϳϲϬ͘ϵϮ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϮϭ ϬϮϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϮϱ͘ϬϮ Ϯϯϰϴϳϱϱ͘ϳϮ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϮϮ ϬϮϮ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϮϱ͘ϭϵ Ϯϯϰϴϳϲϲ͘ϯϭ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϮϯ ϬϮϯ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϮϱ͘ϬϮ Ϯϯϰϴϳϱϴ͘ϯϮ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϮϰ ϬϮϰ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϯϰ͘ϯϵ Ϯϯϰϴϳϲϲ͘ϯϭ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϮϱ ϬϮϱ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϮϲ͘Ϯϯ ϮϯϰϴϱϭϬ͘ϱϴ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϮϲ ϬϮϲ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϯϱ͘Ϭϵ Ϯϯϰϴϱϴϭ͘ϱϴ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϮϳ ϬϮϳ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϮϱ͘ϴϵ Ϯϯϰϴϱϴϰ͘ϱϰ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϮϴ ϬϮϴ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϮϲ͘Ϭϲ ϮϯϰϴϱϬϳ͘ϵϳ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϮϵ ϬϮϵ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϯϱ͘Ϯϲ Ϯϯϰϴϰϵϵ͘ϵϵ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϯϬ ϬϯϬ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϯϱ͘Ϯϲ ϮϯϰϴϱϬϳ͘ϵϳ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϯϭ Ϭϯϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϮϲ͘Ϭϲ Ϯϯϰϴϱϵϱ͘ϭϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϯϮ ϬϯϮ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϯϱ͘Ϭϵ Ϯϯϰϴϱϴϰ͘ϱϰ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϯϯ Ϭϯϯ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϯϱ͘Ϭϵ Ϯϯϰϴϱϴϵ͘ϳϰ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϯϰ Ϭϯϰ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϮϱ͘ϴϵ Ϯϯϰϴϱϴϵ͘ϳϰ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϯϱ Ϭϯϱ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϯϱ͘Ϯϲ ϮϯϰϴϱϬϱ͘ϮϬ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϯϲ Ϭϯϲ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϯϱ͘Ϯϲ ϮϯϰϴϱϬϮ͘ϱϵ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϯϳ Ϭϯϳ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϮϲ͘Ϭϲ ϮϯϰϴϱϬϮ͘ϱϵ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϯϴ Ϭϯϴ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϯϱ͘Ϭϵ Ϯϯϰϴϱϴϳ͘ϭϰ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϯϵ Ϭϯϵ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϯϱ͘Ϭϵ ϮϯϰϴϱϵϮ͘ϱϮ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϰϬ ϬϰϬ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϮϲ͘Ϭϲ Ϯϯϰϴϰϵϵ͘ϵϵ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϰϭ Ϭϰϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϮϲ͘Ϭϲ Ϯϯϰϴϰϵϳ͘Ϭϰ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϰϮ ϬϰϮ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϯϱ͘Ϯϲ Ϯϯϰϴϱϵϱ͘ϭϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϰϯ Ϭϰϯ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϯϱ͘Ϯϲ Ϯϯϰϴϰϵϳ͘Ϭϰ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϰϰ Ϭϰϰ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϮϱ͘ϴϵ Ϯϯϰϴϱϴϭ͘ϱϴ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϰϱ Ϭϰϱ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϮϱ͘ϴϵ Ϯϯϰϴϱϴϳ͘ϭϰ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϰϲ Ϭϰϲ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϮϲ͘Ϭϲ ϮϯϰϴϱϬϱ͘ϮϬ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϰϳ Ϭϰϳ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϯϱ͘ϰϯ ϮϯϰϴϱϭϬ͘ϱϴ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϰϴ Ϭϰϴ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϮϱ͘ϴϵ ϮϯϰϴϱϵϮ͘ϱϮ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϰϵ Ϭϰϵ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϳϮϯ͘Ϭϳ ϮϯϰϴϰϭϬ͘ϰϲ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϱϬ ϬϱϬ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϳϮϱ͘ϱϴ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϭ͘Ϯϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϱϭ Ϭϱϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϬϰ͘ϱϳ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϬ͘ϱϳ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϱϮ ϬϱϮ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϭϴ͘ϭϭ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϬ͘Ϯϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϱϯ Ϭϱϯ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϳϮϱ͘ϲϴ ϮϯϰϴϰϭϬ͘ϰϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϱϰ Ϭϱϰ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϬϳ͘ϲϮ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϵ͘ϳϰ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϱϱ Ϭϱϱ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϭϱ͘ϲϬ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϵ͘ϲϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϱϲ Ϭϱϲ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϳϮϴ͘ϭϴ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϭ͘ϮϬ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϱϳ Ϭϱϳ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϬϰ͘ϲϳ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϵ͘ϳϳ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϱϴ Ϭϱϴ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϭϬ͘ϮϮ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϵ͘ϳϭ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϱϵ Ϭϱϵ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϳϯϯ͘ϲϲ ϮϯϰϴϰϭϬ͘ϭϳ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϲϬ ϬϲϬ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϳϮϮ͘ϵϳ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϭ͘Ϯϲ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϲϭ Ϭϲϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϳϯϬ͘ϵϲ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϭ͘ϭϳ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϲϮ ϬϲϮ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϳϯϯ͘ϱϲ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϬ͘ϵϳ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϲϯ Ϭϲϯ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϭϱ͘ϱϭ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϬ͘ϰϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϲϰ Ϭϲϰ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϭϮ͘ϴϯ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϵ͘ϲϴ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϲϱ Ϭϲϱ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϳϯϭ͘Ϭϲ ϮϯϰϴϰϭϬ͘ϯϳ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϲϲ Ϭϲϲ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϳϮϬ͘ϭϮ ϮϯϰϴϰϭϬ͘ϰϵ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϲϳ Ϭϲϳ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϬϳ͘ϱϮ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϬ͘ϱϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϲϴ Ϭϲϴ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϳϮϴ͘Ϯϴ ϮϯϰϴϰϭϬ͘ϰϬ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϲϵ Ϭϲϵ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϭϬ͘ϭϮ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϬ͘ϱϭ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϳϬ ϬϳϬ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϭϴ͘Ϯϭ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϵ͘ϰϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϳϭ Ϭϳϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϳϮϬ͘ϬϮ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϭ͘Ϯϵ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϳϮ ϬϳϮ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϴϭϮ͘ϳϯ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϬ͘ϰϴ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϳϯ Ϭϳϯ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϮϵ͘ϰϵ Ϯϯϰϴϰϭϭ͘ϯϬ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϳϰ Ϭϳϰ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϰϬ͘Ϭϴ Ϯϯϰϴϰϭϭ͘Ϭϭ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϳϱ Ϭϳϱ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϮϲ͘ϰϰ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϮ͘ϭϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϳϲ Ϭϳϲ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϯϳ͘ϯϴ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϮ͘Ϭϭ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϳϳ Ϭϳϳ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϯϰ͘ϳϬ Ϯϯϰϴϰϭϭ͘Ϯϰ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϳϴ Ϭϳϴ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϯϮ͘ϭϬ Ϯϯϰϴϰϭϭ͘Ϯϳ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϳϵ Ϭϳϵ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϯϳ͘ϰϴ Ϯϯϰϴϰϭϭ͘Ϯϭ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϴϬ ϬϴϬ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϯϮ͘ϬϬ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϮ͘Ϭϳ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϴϭ Ϭϴϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϯϰ͘ϲϬ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϮ͘Ϭϰ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϴϮ ϬϴϮ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϯϵ͘ϵϴ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϭ͘ϴϭ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϴϯ Ϭϴϯ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϮϲ͘ϱϰ Ϯϯϰϴϰϭϭ͘ϯϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϴϰ Ϭϴϰ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϮϵ͘ϯϵ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϮ͘ϭϬ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϴϱ Ϭϴϱ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϵϮ͘Ϭϳ ϮϯϰϴϲϬϳ͘ϲϴ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϴϲ Ϭϴϲ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϵϳ͘ϯϴ Ϯϯϰϴϲϭϲ͘ϴϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϴϳ Ϭϴϳ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϵϮ͘ϭϳ Ϯϯϰϴϲϭϲ͘ϴϴ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϴϴ Ϭϴϴ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϵϳ͘Ϯϴ ϮϯϰϴϲϬϳ͘ϲϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϴϵ Ϭϴϵ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϰϬϮ͘ϳϲ Ϯϯϰϴϲϭϲ͘ϲϬ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϬϵϬ ϬϵϬ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϴϵ͘ϮϮ Ϯϯϰϴϲϭϲ͘ϵϭ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϵϭ Ϭϵϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϴϵ͘ϭϮ ϮϯϰϴϲϬϳ͘ϳϭ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ hƌďĂŶƌŽƐƐƌŽĂĚƐ͕/ŶĐ͘ EĂŵĞ D͘/ZĞƐƵůƚ͘Wt>>ǁͬ>ŝ KƉĞƌĂƚŝŶŐdŝŵĞ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƐ ĂLJ ǀĞŶŝŶŐ EŝŐŚƚ dLJƉĞ sĂůƵĞ ŶŽƌŵ͘ĂLJ ^ƉĞĐŝĂů EŝŐŚƚ y z ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ Ě;Ϳ ;ŵŝŶͿ ;ŵŝŶͿ ;ŵŝŶͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ϬϵϮ ϬϵϮ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϵϰ͘ϳϳ Ϯϯϰϴϲϭϲ͘ϴϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϵϯ Ϭϵϯ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϰϬϮ͘ϲϲ ϮϯϰϴϲϬϳ͘ϰϬ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϵϰ Ϭϵϰ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϰϬϬ͘Ϭϲ ϮϯϰϴϲϬϳ͘ϲϬ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϵϱ Ϭϵϱ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϰϬϬ͘ϭϱ Ϯϯϰϴϲϭϲ͘ϴϬ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϵϲ Ϭϵϲ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϵϰ͘ϲϴ ϮϯϰϴϲϬϳ͘ϲϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϵϳ Ϭϵϳ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϰϰ͘ϴϱ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϮ͘ϴϮ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϵϴ Ϭϵϴ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϱϬ͘ϭϱ Ϯϯϰϴϰϭϭ͘ϵϳ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭϵϵ Ϭϵϵ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϰϰ͘ϵϱ ϮϯϰϴϰϭϮ͘ϬϮ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϬ ϭϬϬ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϱϬ͘Ϭϲ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϮ͘ϳϲ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϭ ϭϬϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϱϱ͘ϱϯ Ϯϯϰϴϰϭϭ͘ϳϰ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϮ ϭϬϮ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϰϮ͘ϬϬ ϮϯϰϴϰϭϮ͘Ϭϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϯ ϭϬϯ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϰϭ͘ϵϬ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϮ͘ϴϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϰ ϭϬϰ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϰϳ͘ϱϱ Ϯϯϰϴϰϭϭ͘ϵϵ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϭϬϱ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϱϱ͘ϰϰ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϮ͘ϱϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϲ ϭϬϲ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϱϮ͘ϴϯ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϮ͘ϳϰ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϳ ϭϬϳ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϱϮ͘ϵϯ Ϯϯϰϴϰϭϭ͘ϵϰ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϴ ϭϬϴ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϰϳ͘ϰϱ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϮ͘ϳϵ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϵ ϭϬϵ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϰ͘ϱϬ Ϯϯϰϴϲϭϲ͘ϴϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϭϬ ϭϭϬ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϰ͘ϰϬ ϮϯϰϴϲϬϳ͘ϲϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϭϭ ϭϭϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϲϮ͘ϰϴ Ϯϯϰϴϲϭϲ͘ϲϬ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϭϮ ϭϭϮ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϰϴ͘ϴϰ ϮϯϰϴϲϬϳ͘ϳϭ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϭϯ ϭϭϯ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϳ͘ϭϬ Ϯϯϰϴϲϭϲ͘ϴϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϭϰ ϭϭϰ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϭ͘ϴϵ Ϯϯϰϴϲϭϲ͘ϴϴ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϭϱ ϭϭϱ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϵ͘ϴϴ Ϯϯϰϴϲϭϲ͘ϴϬ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϭϲ ϭϭϲ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϲϮ͘ϯϴ ϮϯϰϴϲϬϳ͘ϰϬ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϭϳ ϭϭϳ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϵ͘ϳϴ ϮϯϰϴϲϬϳ͘ϲϬ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϭϴ ϭϭϴ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϰϴ͘ϵϰ Ϯϯϰϴϲϭϲ͘ϵϭ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϭϵ ϭϭϵ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϭ͘ϳϵ ϮϯϰϴϲϬϳ͘ϲϴ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϮϬ ϭϮϬ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϳ͘ϬϬ ϮϯϰϴϲϬϳ͘ϲϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϮϭ ϭϮϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϵϱ͘ϵϵ ϮϯϰϴϴϬϮ͘Ϯϰ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϮϮ ϭϮϮ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϵϴ͘ϲϳ Ϯϯϰϴϳϵϯ͘Ϭϭ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϮϯ ϭϮϯ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϰϳ͘ϱϱ ϮϯϰϴϴϬϮ͘ϯϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϮϰ ϭϮϰ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϰϬϭ͘Ϯϳ ϮϯϰϴϳϵϮ͘ϴϭ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϮϱ ϭϮϱ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϰϳ͘ϰϱ Ϯϯϰϴϳϵϯ͘ϭϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϮϲ ϭϮϲ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϬ͘ϰϬ Ϯϯϰϴϳϵϯ͘ϭϬ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϮϳ ϭϮϳ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϱ͘ϳϭ ϮϯϰϴϴϬϮ͘Ϯϰ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϮϴ ϭϮϴ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϵϯ͘Ϯϵ Ϯϯϰϴϳϵϯ͘Ϭϳ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϮϵ ϭϮϵ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϰϬϭ͘ϯϳ ϮϯϰϴϴϬϮ͘Ϭϭ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϯϬ ϭϯϬ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϴϳ͘ϴϯ ϮϯϰϴϴϬϮ͘ϯϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϯϭ ϭϯϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϵϯ͘ϯϴ ϮϯϰϴϴϬϮ͘Ϯϳ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϯϮ ϭϯϮ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϯ͘Ϭϭ Ϯϯϰϴϳϵϯ͘Ϭϳ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϯϯ ϭϯϯ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϲϬ͘ϵϵ ϮϯϰϴϳϵϮ͘ϴϭ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϯϰ ϭϯϰ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϴ͘ϰϵ ϮϯϰϴϴϬϮ͘Ϯϭ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϯϱ ϭϯϱ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϴ͘ϯϵ Ϯϯϰϴϳϵϯ͘Ϭϭ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϯϲ ϭϯϲ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϯ͘ϭϭ ϮϯϰϴϴϬϮ͘Ϯϳ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϯϳ ϭϯϳ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϴϳ͘ϳϯ Ϯϯϰϴϳϵϯ͘ϭϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϯϴ ϭϯϴ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϵϱ͘ϴϵ Ϯϯϰϴϳϵϯ͘Ϭϰ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϯϵ ϭϯϵ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϲϭ͘Ϭϵ ϮϯϰϴϴϬϮ͘Ϭϭ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϰϬ ϭϰϬ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϱ͘ϲϭ Ϯϯϰϴϳϵϯ͘Ϭϰ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϰϭ ϭϰϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϵϴ͘ϳϳ ϮϯϰϴϴϬϮ͘Ϯϭ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϰϮ ϭϰϮ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϵϬ͘ϲϴ Ϯϯϰϴϳϵϯ͘ϭϬ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϰϯ ϭϰϯ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϵϬ͘ϳϴ ϮϯϰϴϴϬϮ͘ϯϬ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϰϰ ϭϰϰ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϬ͘ϱϬ ϮϯϰϴϴϬϮ͘ϯϬ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϰϱ ϭϰϱ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϰϰ͘ϴϴ Ϯϯϰϴϳϲϳ͘ϮϬ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϰϲ ϭϰϲ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϯ͘ϴϰ Ϯϯϰϴϳϲϭ͘ϰϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϰϳ ϭϰϳ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϰϯ͘ϰϯ ϮϯϰϴϳϮϰ͘ϭϳ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϰϴ ϭϰϴ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϰϯ͘ϯϮ ϮϯϰϴϳϮϭ͘ϱϳ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϰϵ ϭϰϵ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϰϯ͘ϮϬ Ϯϯϰϴϳϭϴ͘ϵϳ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϱϬ ϭϱϬ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϰϯ͘ϴϰ ϮϯϰϴϳϮϵ͘ϱϰ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϱϭ ϭϱϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϰϱ͘ϭϳ Ϯϯϰϴϳϲϵ͘ϴϬ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϱϮ ϭϱϮ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϯ͘Ϭϯ ϮϯϰϴϳϮϵ͘ϭϰ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϱϯ ϭϱϯ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϰ͘ϯϲ Ϯϯϰϴϳϲϵ͘ϰϬ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϱϰ ϭϱϰ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϮ͘ϯϵ Ϯϯϰϴϳϭϴ͘ϱϳ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϱϱ ϭϱϱ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϰϰ͘ϱϯ Ϯϯϰϴϳϱϵ͘Ϯϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϱϲ ϭϱϲ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϯ͘ϲϬ Ϯϯϰϴϳϱϱ͘ϴϴ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϱϳ ϭϱϳ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϰϰ͘ϲϰ Ϯϯϰϴϳϲϭ͘ϴϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϱϴ ϭϱϴ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϰϯ͘ϱϱ ϮϯϰϴϳϮϲ͘ϵϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϱϵ ϭϱϵ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϰϯ͘Ϭϳ Ϯϯϰϴϳϭϲ͘ϬϮ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϲϬ ϭϲϬ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϯ͘ϳϮ Ϯϯϰϴϳϱϴ͘ϴϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϲϭ ϭϲϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϮ͘ϲϮ ϮϯϰϴϳϮϯ͘ϳϳ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϲϮ ϭϲϮ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϰϰ͘ϰϬ Ϯϯϰϴϳϱϲ͘Ϯϴ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϲϯ ϭϲϯ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϮ͘ϱϭ ϮϯϰϴϳϮϭ͘ϭϳ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϲϰ ϭϲϰ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϮ͘ϳϰ ϮϯϰϴϳϮϲ͘ϱϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϲϱ ϭϲϱ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϯ͘ϵϱ Ϯϯϰϴϳϲϰ͘Ϭϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϲϲ ϭϲϲ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϰϰ͘ϳϲ Ϯϯϰϴϳϲϰ͘ϰϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϲϳ ϭϲϳ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϮ͘Ϯϳ Ϯϯϰϴϳϭϱ͘ϲϮ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϲϴ ϭϲϴ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϰ͘Ϭϳ Ϯϯϰϴϳϲϲ͘ϴϬ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ hƌďĂŶƌŽƐƐƌŽĂĚƐ͕/ŶĐ͘ EĂŵĞ D͘/ZĞƐƵůƚ͘Wt>>ǁͬ>ŝ KƉĞƌĂƚŝŶŐdŝŵĞ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƐ ĂLJ ǀĞŶŝŶŐ EŝŐŚƚ dLJƉĞ sĂůƵĞ ŶŽƌŵ͘ĂLJ ^ƉĞĐŝĂů EŝŐŚƚ y z ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ Ě;Ϳ ;ŵŝŶͿ ;ŵŝŶͿ ;ŵŝŶͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ϭϲϵ ϭϲϵ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϰϯ͘ϮϬ Ϯϯϰϴϲϲϳ͘ϱϴ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϳϬ ϭϳϬ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϮ͘ϳϰ Ϯϯϰϴϲϳϱ͘ϭϲ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϳϭ ϭϳϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϰϯ͘Ϭϳ Ϯϯϰϴϲϲϰ͘ϲϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϳϮ ϭϳϮ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϰϯ͘ϴϰ Ϯϯϰϴϲϳϴ͘ϭϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϳϯ ϭϳϯ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϮ͘ϱϭ Ϯϯϰϴϲϲϵ͘ϳϴ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϳϰ ϭϳϰ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϮ͘ϲϮ ϮϯϰϴϲϳϮ͘ϯϴ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϳϱ ϭϳϱ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϰϯ͘ϰϯ ϮϯϰϴϲϳϮ͘ϳϵ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϳϲ ϭϳϲ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϰϯ͘ϱϱ Ϯϯϰϴϲϳϱ͘ϱϲ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϳϳ ϭϳϳ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϮ͘ϯϵ Ϯϯϰϴϲϲϳ͘ϭϴ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϳϴ ϭϳϴ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϮ͘Ϯϳ Ϯϯϰϴϲϲϰ͘Ϯϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϳϵ ϭϳϵ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϯ͘Ϭϯ Ϯϯϰϴϲϳϳ͘ϳϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϴϬ ϭϴϬ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϰϯ͘ϯϮ ϮϯϰϴϲϳϬ͘ϭϴ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϴϭ ϭϴϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϰϮ͘ϴϭ ϮϯϰϴϳϭϮ͘ϯϴ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϴϮ ϭϴϮ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϮ͘Ϭϭ Ϯϯϰϴϳϭϭ͘ϵϳ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϴϯ ϭϴϯ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϱϮ͘Ϯϳ ϮϯϰϴϳϬϳ͘Ϯϵ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϴϰ ϭϴϰ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϯϰϯ͘Ϭϳ ϮϯϰϴϳϬϳ͘ϲϵ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϴϱ ϭϴϱ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϳϭ͘ϵϭ Ϯϯϰϴϲϰϯ͘ϲϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϴϲ ϭϴϲ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϴϭ͘ϭϴ ϮϯϰϴϲϰϬ͘ϵϮ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϴϳ ϭϴϳ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϴϭ͘ϭϬ Ϯϯϰϴϲϰϯ͘ϴϳ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϴϴ ϭϴϴ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϴϬ͘ϵϬ Ϯϯϰϴϲϱϭ͘ϴϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϴϵ ϭϴϵ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϳϭ͘ϳϳ Ϯϯϰϴϲϰϴ͘ϴϰ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϵϬ ϭϵϬ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϳϭ͘ϵϴ ϮϯϰϴϲϰϬ͘ϲϴ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϵϭ ϭϵϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϴϭ͘Ϭϰ Ϯϯϰϴϲϰϲ͘ϰϳ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϵϮ ϭϵϮ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϳϭ͘ϴϰ Ϯϯϰϴϲϰϲ͘Ϯϰ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϵϯ ϭϵϯ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϳϭ͘ϴϭ Ϯϯϰϴϲϱϰ͘ϮϮ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϵϰ ϭϵϰ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϴϬ͘ϵϳ Ϯϯϰϴϲϰϵ͘Ϭϳ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϵϱ ϭϵϱ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϴϭ͘Ϭϭ Ϯϯϰϴϲϱϰ͘ϰϲ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϵϲ ϭϵϲ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϳϭ͘ϳϬ Ϯϯϰϴϲϱϭ͘ϲϮ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϵϳ ϭϵϳ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϳϭ͘ϲϯ Ϯϯϰϴϲϴϰ͘ϰϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϵϴ ϭϵϴ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϳϭ͘ϰϵ Ϯϯϰϴϲϴϵ͘ϵϵ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϵϵ ϭϵϵ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϴϬ͘ϲϵ ϮϯϰϴϲϵϬ͘ϮϮ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϬϬ ϮϬϬ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϴϬ͘ϳϲ Ϯϯϰϴϲϴϳ͘ϲϮ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϬϭ ϮϬϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϴϬ͘ϴϯ Ϯϯϰϴϲϴϰ͘ϲϳ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϬϮ ϮϬϮ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϳϭ͘ϱϲ Ϯϯϰϴϲϴϳ͘ϯϴ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϬϯ ϮϬϯ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϭϭ͘Ϯϳ Ϯϯϰϴϳϴϳ͘ϲϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϬϰ ϮϬϰ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϭϭ͘ϭϳ Ϯϯϰϴϳϳϴ͘ϰϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϬϱ ϮϬϱ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϱϰ͘ϴϰ Ϯϯϰϴϳϴϴ͘Ϭϰ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϬϲ ϮϬϲ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϬϯ͘Ϯϴ Ϯϯϰϴϳϴϳ͘ϳϮ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϬϳ ϮϬϳ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϱϳ͘ϰϱ Ϯϯϰϴϳϴϴ͘Ϭϭ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϬϴ ϮϬϴ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϬϯ͘ϭϴ Ϯϯϰϴϳϳϴ͘ϱϭ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϬϵ ϮϬϵ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϲϴ͘Ϯϭ Ϯϯϰϴϳϴϳ͘ϲϲ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϭϬ ϮϭϬ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϲϬ͘ϭϯ Ϯϯϰϴϳϳϴ͘ϳϴ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϭϭ Ϯϭϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϳϯ͘ϱϵ Ϯϯϰϴϳϴϳ͘ϰϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϭϮ ϮϭϮ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϲϯ͘ϬϬ Ϯϯϰϴϳϴϳ͘ϳϮ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϭϯ Ϯϭϯ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϲϱ͘ϲϭ Ϯϯϰϴϳϴϳ͘ϲϵ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϭϰ Ϯϭϰ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϲϴ͘ϭϭ Ϯϯϰϴϳϳϴ͘ϰϲ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϭϱ Ϯϭϱ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϲϮ͘ϴϯ Ϯϯϰϴϳϴϳ͘ϳϴ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϭϲ Ϯϭϲ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϭϯ͘ϳϳ Ϯϯϰϴϳϳϴ͘Ϯϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϭϳ Ϯϭϳ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϳϬ͘ϴϵ Ϯϯϰϴϳϳϴ͘ϰϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϭϴ Ϯϭϴ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϬϬ͘Ϯϯ Ϯϯϰϴϳϳϴ͘ϱϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϭϵ Ϯϭϵ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϱϮ͘Ϯϰ Ϯϯϰϴϳϴϴ͘Ϭϲ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϮϬ ϮϮϬ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϱϵ͘ϵϱ Ϯϯϰϴϳϳϴ͘ϱϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϮϭ ϮϮϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϭϯ͘ϴϳ Ϯϯϰϴϳϴϳ͘ϰϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϮϮ ϮϮϮ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϬϱ͘ϳϵ Ϯϯϰϴϳϳϴ͘ϰϵ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϮϯ ϮϮϯ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϲϮ͘ϵϬ Ϯϯϰϴϳϳϴ͘ϱϭ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϮϰ ϮϮϰ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϲϬ͘Ϭϱ Ϯϯϰϴϳϴϳ͘ϳϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϮϱ ϮϮϱ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϬϬ͘ϯϯ Ϯϯϰϴϳϴϳ͘ϳϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϮϲ ϮϮϲ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϲϬ͘ϮϮ Ϯϯϰϴϳϴϳ͘ϵϴ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϮϳ ϮϮϳ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϳϯ͘ϰϵ Ϯϯϰϴϳϳϴ͘Ϯϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϮϴ ϮϮϴ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϱϳ͘ϯϱ Ϯϯϰϴϳϳϴ͘ϴϭ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϮϵ ϮϮϵ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϬϴ͘ϰϵ Ϯϯϰϴϳϴϳ͘ϲϲ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϯϬ ϮϯϬ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϰϵ͘Ϯϵ Ϯϯϰϴϳϴϴ͘Ϭϵ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϯϭ Ϯϯϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϱϮ͘ϭϰ Ϯϯϰϴϳϳϴ͘ϴϲ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϯϮ ϮϯϮ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϬϴ͘ϯϵ Ϯϯϰϴϳϳϴ͘ϰϲ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϯϯ Ϯϯϯ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϳϬ͘ϵϵ Ϯϯϰϴϳϴϳ͘ϲϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϯϰ Ϯϯϰ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϱϰ͘ϳϰ Ϯϯϰϴϳϳϴ͘ϴϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϯϱ Ϯϯϱ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϲϮ͘ϳϯ Ϯϯϰϴϳϳϴ͘ϱϴ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϯϲ Ϯϯϲ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϬϱ͘ϴϴ Ϯϯϰϴϳϴϳ͘ϲϵ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϯϳ Ϯϯϳ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϲϱ͘ϱϭ Ϯϯϰϴϳϳϴ͘ϰϵ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϯϴ Ϯϯϴ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϰϵ͘ϭϵ Ϯϯϰϴϳϳϴ͘ϴϵ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϯϵ Ϯϯϵ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϲϭ͘ϱϮ ϮϯϰϴϲϬϭ͘ϰϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϰϬ ϮϰϬ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϭϮ͘ϯϴ ϮϯϰϴϲϬϭ͘ϭϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϰϭ Ϯϰϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϲϲ͘ϳϮ ϮϯϰϴϲϬϭ͘ϯϴ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϰϮ ϮϰϮ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϱϬ͘ϴϱ ϮϯϰϴϲϭϬ͘ϵϴ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϰϯ Ϯϰϯ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϱϴ͘ϱϲ ϮϯϰϴϲϬϭ͘ϰϲ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϰϰ Ϯϰϰ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϱϴ͘ϲϲ ϮϯϰϴϲϭϬ͘ϲϲ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϰϱ Ϯϰϱ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϭϮ͘ϰϴ ϮϯϰϴϲϭϬ͘ϯϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ hƌďĂŶƌŽƐƐƌŽĂĚƐ͕/ŶĐ͘ EĂŵĞ D͘/ZĞƐƵůƚ͘Wt>>ǁͬ>ŝ KƉĞƌĂƚŝŶŐdŝŵĞ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƐ ĂLJ ǀĞŶŝŶŐ EŝŐŚƚ dLJƉĞ sĂůƵĞ ŶŽƌŵ͘ĂLJ ^ƉĞĐŝĂů EŝŐŚƚ y z ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ Ě;Ϳ ;ŵŝŶͿ ;ŵŝŶͿ ;ŵŝŶͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ Ϯϰϲ Ϯϰϲ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϬϭ͘ϳϵ ϮϯϰϴϲϬϭ͘ϰϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϰϳ Ϯϰϳ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϬϵ͘ϴϴ ϮϯϰϴϲϭϬ͘ϱϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϰϴ Ϯϰϴ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϵϴ͘ϵϰ ϮϯϰϴϲϭϬ͘ϲϲ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϰϵ Ϯϰϵ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϲϰ͘ϮϮ ϮϯϰϴϲϭϬ͘ϲϬ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϱϬ ϮϱϬ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϲϲ͘ϴϮ ϮϯϰϴϲϭϬ͘ϱϴ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϱϭ Ϯϱϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϱϯ͘ϯϲ ϮϯϰϴϲϬϭ͘ϳϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϱϮ ϮϱϮ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϬϭ͘ϴϵ ϮϯϰϴϲϭϬ͘ϲϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϱϯ Ϯϱϯ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϳϮ͘ϮϬ ϮϯϰϴϲϭϬ͘ϯϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϱϰ Ϯϱϰ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϱϱ͘ϵϲ ϮϯϰϴϲϬϭ͘ϳϮ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϱϱ Ϯϱϱ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϱϴ͘ϴϰ ϮϯϰϴϲϭϬ͘ϴϵ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϱϲ Ϯϱϲ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϵϴ͘ϴϰ ϮϯϰϴϲϬϭ͘ϰϲ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϱϳ Ϯϱϳ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϬϳ͘ϭϬ ϮϯϰϴϲϭϬ͘ϱϴ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϱϴ Ϯϱϴ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϲϵ͘ϲϬ ϮϯϰϴϲϭϬ͘ϱϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϱϵ Ϯϱϵ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϳϮ͘ϭϬ ϮϯϰϴϲϬϭ͘ϭϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϲϬ ϮϲϬ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϲϭ͘ϯϰ ϮϯϰϴϲϬϭ͘ϰϵ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϲϭ Ϯϲϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϲϵ͘ϱϬ ϮϯϰϴϲϬϭ͘ϯϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϲϮ ϮϲϮ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϱϲ͘Ϭϲ ϮϯϰϴϲϭϬ͘ϵϮ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϲϯ Ϯϲϯ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϬϳ͘ϬϬ ϮϯϰϴϲϬϭ͘ϯϴ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϲϰ Ϯϲϰ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϱϴ͘ϳϰ ϮϯϰϴϲϬϭ͘ϲϵ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϲϱ Ϯϲϱ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϬϰ͘ϰϬ ϮϯϰϴϲϬϭ͘ϰϬ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϲϲ Ϯϲϲ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϲϰ͘ϭϮ ϮϯϰϴϲϬϭ͘ϰϬ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϲϳ Ϯϲϳ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϰϳ͘ϴϬ ϮϯϰϴϲϬϭ͘ϴϭ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϲϴ Ϯϲϴ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϱϲϭ͘ϲϭ ϮϯϰϴϲϭϬ͘ϲϯ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϲϵ Ϯϲϵ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϬϰ͘ϱϬ ϮϯϰϴϲϭϬ͘ϲϬ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ ϮϳϬ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϰϳ͘ϵϬ Ϯϯϰϴϲϭϭ͘Ϭϭ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϳϭ Ϯϳϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϬϵ͘ϳϴ ϮϯϰϴϲϬϭ͘ϯϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϮ ϮϳϮ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϲϭ͘ϰϰ ϮϯϰϴϲϭϬ͘ϲϵ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϳϯ Ϯϳϯ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϱϯ͘ϰϱ ϮϯϰϴϲϭϬ͘ϵϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϳϰ Ϯϳϰ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϱϬ͘ϳϱ ϮϯϰϴϲϬϭ͘ϳϴ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϳϱ Ϯϳϱ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϴϭ͘ϯϮ ϮϯϰϴϳϮϲ͘ϭϲ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϳϲ Ϯϳϲ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϴϭ͘ϯϱ Ϯϯϰϴϳϯϭ͘ϱϰ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϳϳ Ϯϳϳ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϳϮ͘ϭϮ ϮϯϰϴϳϮϱ͘ϵϮ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϳϴ Ϯϳϴ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϳϮ͘ϯϯ Ϯϯϰϴϳϭϳ͘ϳϳ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϳϵ Ϯϳϵ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϴϭ͘ϰϱ ϮϯϰϴϳϮϬ͘ϵϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϴϬ ϮϴϬ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϳϮ͘ϭϵ ϮϯϰϴϳϮϯ͘ϯϮ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϴϭ Ϯϴϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϳϮ͘ϭϲ Ϯϯϰϴϳϯϭ͘ϯϭ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϮϴϮ ϮϴϮ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϴϭ͘Ϯϱ ϮϯϰϴϳϮϴ͘ϵϰ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϴϯ Ϯϴϯ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϳϮ͘Ϯϱ ϮϯϰϴϳϮϬ͘ϳϮ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϴϰ Ϯϴϰ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϴϭ͘ϯϴ ϮϯϰϴϳϮϯ͘ϱϱ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϴϱ Ϯϴϱ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϳϮ͘Ϭϱ ϮϯϰϴϳϮϴ͘ϳϬ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯϴϲ Ϯϴϲ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ ϳϲ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϳϲ ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϬϬ Ő ϲϮϭϭϲϴϭ͘ϱϯ Ϯϯϰϴϳϭϴ͘ϬϬ ϯϴ͘ϬϬ dZ^,ϭ dZ^,ϭ ϴϵ͘Ϭ ϴϵ͘Ϭ ϴϵ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϴϵ ϵϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϱϰϬ͘ϬϬ ϴ͘ϬϬ Ă ϲϮϭϭϳϳϬ͘ϮϬ ϮϯϰϴϵϬϱ͘ϰϴ ϴ͘ϬϬ dZ^,Ϯ dZ^,Ϯ ϴϵ͘Ϭ ϴϵ͘Ϭ ϴϵ͘Ϭ >ǁ ϴϵ ϵϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϱϰϬ͘ϬϬ ϴ͘ϬϬ Ă ϲϮϭϭϳϱϰ͘ϱϳ Ϯϯϰϴϰϳϭ͘ϰϱ ϴ͘ϬϬ >ŝŶĞ^ŽƵƌĐĞ;ƐͿ EĂŵĞ D͘/ZĞƐƵůƚ͘Wt>ZĞƐƵůƚ͘Wt>Ζ >ǁͬ>ŝ KƉĞƌĂƚŝŶŐdŝŵĞ DŽǀŝŶŐWƚ͘^ƌĐ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ĂLJ ǀĞŶŝŶŐ EŝŐŚƚ ĂLJ ǀĞŶŝŶŐ EŝŐŚƚ dLJƉĞ sĂůƵĞ ŶŽƌŵ͘ĂLJ ^ƉĞĐŝĂů EŝŐŚƚ EƵŵďĞƌ ^ƉĞĞĚ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ Ě;Ϳ ;ŵŝŶͿ ;ŵŝŶͿ ;ŵŝŶͿ ĂLJ ǀĞŶŝŶŐ EŝŐŚƚ ;ŵƉŚͿ ;ĨƚͿ EĂŵĞ /,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƐ ĞŐŝŶ ŶĚ dž LJ nj 'ƌŽƵŶĚ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ƌĞĂ^ŽƵƌĐĞ;ƐͿ EĂŵĞ D͘/ZĞƐƵůƚ͘Wt>ZĞƐƵůƚ͘Wt>ΖΖ >ǁͬ>ŝ KƉĞƌĂƚŝŶŐdŝŵĞ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ĂLJ ǀĞŶŝŶŐ EŝŐŚƚ ĂLJ ǀĞŶŝŶŐ EŝŐŚƚ dLJƉĞ sĂůƵĞ ŶŽƌŵ͘ĂLJ ^ƉĞĐŝĂů EŝŐŚƚ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ Ě;Ϳ ;ŵŝŶͿ ;ŵŝŶͿ ;ŵŝŶͿ WZ<ϭ WZ<ϭ ϭϬϭ͘ϴ ϭϬϭ͘ϴ ϭϬϭ͘ϴ ϲϯ͘Ϭ ϲϯ͘Ϭ ϲϯ͘Ϭ >ǁΗ ϲϯ Ϭ͘Ă WZ<Ϯ WZ<Ϯ ϵϯ͘ϯ ϵϯ͘ϯ ϵϯ͘ϯ ϲϯ͘Ϭ ϲϯ͘Ϭ ϲϯ͘Ϭ >ǁΗ ϲϯ Ϭ͘Ă WZ<ϯ WZ<ϯ ϵϵ͘ϵ ϵϵ͘ϵ ϵϵ͘ϵ ϲϯ͘Ϭ ϲϯ͘Ϭ ϲϯ͘Ϭ >ǁΗ ϲϯ Ϭ͘Ă EĂŵĞ /,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƐ ĞŐŝŶ ŶĚ dž LJ nj 'ƌŽƵŶĚ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ WZ<ϭ WZ<ϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ă ϲϮϭϭϳϭϱ͘ϲϴ Ϯϯϰϴϳϱϭ͘ϯϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϭϱ͘ϲϴ Ϯϯϰϴϳϵϲ͘ϭϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϯϰ͘Ϭϵ Ϯϯϰϴϳϵϱ͘ϳϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϯϯ͘ϳϰ ϮϯϰϴϴϬϵ͘ϵϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϮϯ͘ϯϮ ϮϯϰϴϴϮϭ͘ϭϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϯ͘ϭϴ Ϯϯϰϴϴϭϵ͘ϳϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϬϮ͘ϰϵ ϮϯϰϴϴϮϭ͘ϴϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϯϭ͘ϰϴ ϮϯϰϴϴϮϭ͘Ϯϴ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϯϮϳ͘ϯϮ ϮϯϰϴϴϮϮ͘ϯϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϯϭϳ͘ϰϮ Ϯϯϰϴϴϭϴ͘ϯϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϯϭϮ͘ϱϲ ϮϯϰϴϴϬϵ͘ϯϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ hƌďĂŶƌŽƐƐƌŽĂĚƐ͕/ŶĐ͘ I 111 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I I I I I I I I 11111 I 11 I 111 I I I I I I EĂŵĞ /,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƐ ĞŐŝŶ ŶĚ dž LJ nj 'ƌŽƵŶĚ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ϲϮϭϭϯϭϰ͘ϯϬ Ϯϯϰϴϳϴϯ͘ϵϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϯϭϰ͘ϯϬ Ϯϯϰϴϳϳϭ͘ϭϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϯϭϱ͘ϯϰ Ϯϯϰϴϱϵϯ͘ϯϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϯϮϲ͘ϭϬ Ϯϯϰϴϱϵϯ͘ϲϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϯϮϲ͘ϭϬ Ϯϯϰϴϱϴϱ͘ϯϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϯϭ͘ϯϭ Ϯϯϰϴϱϴϰ͘ϲϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϯϳ͘ϱϲ ϮϯϰϴϱϴϮ͘ϱϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϯϳ͘ϵϭ Ϯϯϰϴϱϱϯ͘ϳϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϮϵ͘ϵϮ Ϯϯϰϴϱϱϰ͘Ϭϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϮϵ͘ϱϳ Ϯϯϰϴϱϯϲ͘Ϭϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϮϴϭ͘ϯϭ Ϯϯϰϴϱϯϱ͘ϯϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϮϲϯ͘Ϯϱ ϮϯϰϴϱϱϮ͘ϯϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϮϲϰ͘ϯϬ ϮϯϰϴϲϮϲ͘ϲϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϮϴϭ͘ϲϲ ϮϯϰϴϲϮϲ͘ϯϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϮϴϮ͘ϯϱ Ϯϯϰϴϲϯϯ͘ϵϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϮϲϯ͘ϲϬ Ϯϯϰϴϲϯϰ͘ϯϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϮϲϰ͘ϯϬ Ϯϯϰϴϴϭϲ͘ϵϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϮϴϯ͘ϯϵ Ϯϯϰϴϴϭϲ͘ϵϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϮϴϯ͘Ϭϱ Ϯϯϰϴϴϯϳ͘Ϭϴ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϮϲϰ͘ϯϬ Ϯϯϰϴϴϯϳ͘Ϭϴ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϮϲϰ͘ϲϰ Ϯϯϰϴϵϭϲ͘ϱϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϮϴϳ͘ϱϲ Ϯϯϰϴϵϭϲ͘ϱϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϮϴϳ͘ϱϲ Ϯϯϰϴϵϯϱ͘ϯϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϲϯ͘ϵϱ Ϯϯϰϴϵϯϯ͘ϵϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϲϰ͘ϵϵ Ϯϯϰϴϴϵϯ͘ϲϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϴϮ͘ϳϬ Ϯϯϰϴϴϵϰ͘ϯϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϴϯ͘Ϭϱ Ϯϯϰϴϳϰϲ͘ϴϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϯϰ͘ϳϴ Ϯϯϰϴϳϰϳ͘ϰϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϯϰ͘ϳϴ Ϯϯϰϴϳϱϭ͘ϲϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ WZ<Ϯ WZ<Ϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ă ϲϮϭϭϰϯϵ͘ϵϵ Ϯϯϰϴϳϵϳ͘ϴϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϴϴ͘ϲϬ Ϯϯϰϴϳϵϴ͘ϭϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϵϬ͘ϯϰ Ϯϯϰϴϳϵϯ͘ϯϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϵϬ͘ϯϰ ϮϯϰϴϳϲϮ͘ϰϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϬϳ͘ϬϬ ϮϯϰϴϳϲϮ͘Ϯϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϬϳ͘ϯϱ Ϯϯϰϴϲϯϲ͘ϯϴ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϴϴ͘ϵϱ Ϯϯϰϴϲϯϲ͘Ϭϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϴϵ͘ϲϰ ϮϯϰϴϲϮϵ͘Ϭϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϴϵ͘ϴϴ ϮϯϰϴϲϬϵ͘ϯϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϯϵ͘ϯϬ ϮϯϰϴϲϬϵ͘ϵϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ WZ<ϯ WZ<ϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ă ϲϮϭϭϳϴϮ͘ϬϬ Ϯϯϰϴϳϯϯ͘Ϯϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϴϮ͘ϬϬ Ϯϯϰϴϳϭϲ͘Ϯϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϲϯ͘ϵϱ Ϯϯϰϴϳϭϱ͘ϱϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϲϱ͘ϲϴ ϮϯϰϴϳϬϲ͘ϱϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϳϮ͘Ϯϴ Ϯϯϰϴϲϵϴ͘ϱϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϴϭ͘ϯϭ Ϯϯϰϴϲϵϴ͘ϭϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϳϵ͘ϱϳ Ϯϯϰϴϲϰϴ͘ϭϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϲϴ͘ϴϭ ϮϯϰϴϲϰϮ͘ϲϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϲϰ͘ϯϬ Ϯϯϰϴϲϯϲ͘ϯϴ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϲϯ͘ϲϬ ϮϯϰϴϲϮϴ͘ϳϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϴϬ͘ϵϲ ϮϯϰϴϲϮϴ͘ϳϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϴϮ͘ϬϬ Ϯϯϰϴϱϵϰ͘ϬϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϲϮ͘ϱϲ Ϯϯϰϴϱϵϯ͘ϲϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϲϯ͘Ϯϱ Ϯϯϰϴϱϳϵ͘ϳϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϴϭ͘ϯϭ Ϯϯϰϴϱϳϵ͘Ϭϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϴϭ͘ϲϲ Ϯϯϰϴϰϳϱ͘Ϯϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϲϯ͘ϲϬ Ϯϯϰϴϰϳϰ͘ϱϴ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϲϯ͘ϵϱ Ϯϯϰϴϰϳϳ͘ϳϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϰϱ͘ϮϬ Ϯϯϰϴϰϳϳ͘ϯϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϰϰ͘ϴϱ Ϯϯϰϴϰϱϯ͘Ϭϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϳϵ͘ϵϮ Ϯϯϰϴϰϱϯ͘ϰϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϳϵ͘ϵϮ Ϯϯϰϴϰϳϭ͘ϰϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϳϯ͘ϲϳ Ϯϯϰϴϰϳϭ͘ϰϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϳϯ͘ϲϳ Ϯϯϰϴϰϱϰ͘ϳϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϬϯ͘ϱϯ Ϯϯϰϴϰϱϯ͘Ϭϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϬϯ͘ϱϯ ϮϯϰϴϰϳϬ͘ϰϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϬϬ͘ϳϱ Ϯϯϰϴϰϳϭ͘ϴϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϴϳ͘ϱϲ Ϯϯϰϴϰϲϰ͘ϭϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϴϴ͘Ϯϱ Ϯϯϰϴϰϰϴ͘ϭϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϬϲ͘ϯϭ Ϯϯϰϴϰϰϴ͘ϱϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϬϰ͘ϵϮ Ϯϯϰϴϯϲϴ͘ϯϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϱϳ͘ϳϬ Ϯϯϰϴϯϲϴ͘ϯϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϯϴ͘ϲϬ Ϯϯϰϴϯϲϴ͘ϲϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϯϵ͘ϯϬ ϮϯϰϴϱϮϰ͘ϵϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϱϳ͘ϳϬ ϮϯϰϴϱϮϲ͘ϲϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϱϵ͘Ϭϵ Ϯϯϰϴϱϯϵ͘ϱϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϱϯ͘ϱϯ Ϯϯϰϴϱϰϴ͘ϭϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϰϰ͘ϭϲ Ϯϯϰϴϱϱϰ͘Ϭϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ hƌďĂŶƌŽƐƐƌŽĂĚƐ͕/ŶĐ͘ EĂŵĞ /,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƐ ĞŐŝŶ ŶĚ dž LJ nj 'ƌŽƵŶĚ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ϲϮϭϭϰϰϱ͘ϱϱ ϮϯϰϴϱϴϮ͘ϮϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϴϳ͘Ϯϭ Ϯϯϰϴϱϴϰ͘ϯϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϵϰ͘ϭϲ Ϯϯϰϴϱϳϭ͘ϰϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϬϰ͘ϵϰ ϮϯϰϴϱϳϬ͘ϳϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϯ͘ϭϴ Ϯϯϰϴϱϲϵ͘ϳϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϭϴ͘ϭϮ Ϯϯϰϴϱϲϳ͘Ϯϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϯϰ͘ϰϯ ϮϯϰϴϱϴϬ͘ϴϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϯϰ͘ϰϯ Ϯϯϰϴϱϵϯ͘ϲϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϭϲ͘Ϭϯ Ϯϯϰϴϱϵϰ͘ϬϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϭϱ͘ϯϰ Ϯϯϰϴϲϰϲ͘ϭϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϯϰ͘Ϭϵ Ϯϯϰϴϲϰϲ͘ϴϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϯϰ͘Ϭϵ Ϯϯϰϴϲϵϳ͘ϭϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϭϱ͘ϲϴ Ϯϯϰϴϲϵϲ͘ϴϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϭϱ͘ϯϰ Ϯϯϰϴϳϯϰ͘ϯϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ĂƌƌŝĞƌ;ƐͿ EĂŵĞ ^Ğů͘D͘/ďƐŽƌƉƚŝŽŶ Ͳ džƚ͘ĂŶƚŝůĞǀĞƌ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƐ ůĞĨƚ ƌŝŐŚƚ ŚŽƌnj͘ǀĞƌƚ͘ĞŐŝŶ ŶĚ dž LJ nj 'ƌŽƵŶĚ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐ;ƐͿ EĂŵĞ ^Ğů͘D͘/ZZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ ďƐŽƌƉƚŝŽŶ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƐ ĞŐŝŶ dž LJ nj 'ƌŽƵŶĚ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ h/>/E'h/>/E'ϬϬϬϬϭ dž Ϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ă ϲϮϭϭϰϯϭ͘ϰϴ ϮϯϰϴϴϮϭ͘Ϯϴ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϯϮ͘ϯϱ Ϯϯϰϴϳϴϯ͘ϵϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϮϮ͘ϵϴ Ϯϯϰϴϳϴϯ͘ϵϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϮϮ͘ϵϴ Ϯϯϰϴϳϴϭ͘ϴϳ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϭϴ͘ϰϲ ϮϯϰϴϳϴϮ͘ϱϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϭϴ͘ϰϲ Ϯϯϰϴϳϳϴ͘ϳϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϮϮ͘ϵϴ Ϯϯϰϴϳϳϵ͘Ϭϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϮϮ͘ϲϯ Ϯϯϰϴϳϳϳ͘Ϭϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϮϳ͘ϭϰ Ϯϯϰϴϳϳϳ͘ϳϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϮϲ͘ϭϬ Ϯϯϰϴϳϱϴ͘ϵϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϭϳ͘ϰϮ Ϯϯϰϴϳϱϴ͘Ϯϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϭϲ͘ϳϯ ϮϯϰϴϳϰϮ͘Ϯϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϬϳ͘ϯϱ ϮϯϰϴϳϰϮ͘Ϯϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϬϳ͘ϯϱ Ϯϯϰϴϳϰϱ͘ϳϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϯϳϳ͘ϰϵ Ϯϯϰϴϳϰϲ͘ϭϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϯϳϰ͘ϯϳ ϮϯϰϴϳϰϮ͘Ϯϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϯϳϰ͘ϳϭ Ϯϯϰϴϳϭϯ͘ϰϳ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϯϳϴ͘ϭϴ Ϯϯϰϴϳϭϯ͘ϭϮ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϯϳϴ͘ϭϴ Ϯϯϰϴϲϵϯ͘ϲϳ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϯϳϱ͘Ϭϲ Ϯϯϰϴϲϵϰ͘ϬϮ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϯϳϱ͘Ϭϲ Ϯϯϰϴϲϲϯ͘ϴϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϯϳϳ͘ϭϰ Ϯϯϰϴϲϲϭ͘ϳϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϬϳ͘ϬϬ Ϯϯϰϴϲϲϭ͘Ϭϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϬϲ͘ϲϲ Ϯϯϰϴϲϲϱ͘ϮϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϭϲ͘ϯϴ Ϯϯϰϴϲϲϱ͘ϮϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϭϲ͘ϯϴ Ϯϯϰϴϲϰϴ͘ϱϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϮϱ͘ϳϱ Ϯϯϰϴϲϰϴ͘ϭϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϮϱ͘ϰϭ ϮϯϰϴϲϮϵ͘ϰϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϮϭ͘ϱϵ ϮϯϰϴϲϮϵ͘ϰϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϮϭ͘ϵϯ ϮϯϰϴϲϮϮ͘ϴϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϯϬ͘ϵϲ ϮϯϰϴϲϮϮ͘ϴϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϯϭ͘ϯϭ Ϯϯϰϴϱϴϰ͘ϲϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϯϮϲ͘ϭϬ Ϯϯϰϴϱϴϱ͘ϯϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϯϮϲ͘ϭϬ Ϯϯϰϴϱϵϯ͘ϲϳ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϯϭϱ͘ϯϰ Ϯϯϰϴϱϵϯ͘ϯϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϯϭϱ͘ϯϰ ϮϯϰϴϲϮϯ͘ϭϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϯϮϲ͘ϰϱ ϮϯϰϴϲϮϯ͘ϱϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϯϮϲ͘ϴϬ ϮϯϰϴϲϯϬ͘ϭϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϯϭϰ͘ϵϵ ϮϯϰϴϲϮϵ͘ϳϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϯϭϲ͘Ϭϯ Ϯϯϰϴϳϳϭ͘ϰϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϯϭϰ͘ϯϬ Ϯϯϰϴϳϳϭ͘ϭϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϯϭϰ͘ϯϬ Ϯϯϰϴϳϴϯ͘ϵϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϯϭϱ͘ϲϴ Ϯϯϰϴϳϴϰ͘ϯϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϯϭϲ͘ϳϯ Ϯϯϰϴϴϭϯ͘ϴϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϯϮϲ͘ϰϱ Ϯϯϰϴϴϭϰ͘ϭϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϯϮϳ͘ϯϮ ϮϯϰϴϴϮϮ͘ϯϮ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ h/>/E'h/>/E'ϬϬϬϬϮ dž Ϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ă ϲϮϭϭϱϬϮ͘ϰϵ ϮϯϰϴϴϮϭ͘ϴϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϭϱ͘ϯϰ ϮϯϰϴϴϮϭ͘ϴϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϭϱ͘ϯϰ ϮϯϰϴϴϮϬ͘ϳϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϯ͘ϭϴ Ϯϯϰϴϴϭϵ͘ϳϮ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϯ͘ϴϴ Ϯϯϰϴϳϵϴ͘ϴϴ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ hƌďĂŶƌŽƐƐƌŽĂĚƐ͕/ŶĐ͘ I I 111 I I I I I I I I I I I EĂŵĞ ^Ğů͘D͘/ZZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ ďƐŽƌƉƚŝŽŶ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƐ ĞŐŝŶ dž LJ nj 'ƌŽƵŶĚ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ϲϮϭϭϲϵϯ͘ϴϭ Ϯϯϰϴϳϵϴ͘ϱϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϵϰ͘ϭϲ ϮϯϰϴϳϵϬ͘ϱϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϯ͘ϭϴ ϮϯϰϴϳϵϬ͘ϮϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϯ͘ϭϴ ϮϯϰϴϳϴϬ͘ϭϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϳ͘ϯϱ ϮϯϰϴϳϴϬ͘ϭϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϳ͘ϳϬ ϮϯϰϴϳϳϬ͘ϰϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϯ͘ϴϴ Ϯϯϰϴϳϳϭ͘ϭϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϰ͘ϱϳ Ϯϯϰϴϳϱϴ͘ϵϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϮ͘ϭϰ Ϯϯϰϴϳϱϴ͘ϵϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϮ͘ϭϰ Ϯϯϰϴϳϯϲ͘Ϭϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϯ͘ϭϴ Ϯϯϰϴϳϯϲ͘Ϭϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϯ͘ϱϯ ϮϯϰϴϳϬϰ͘ϳϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϱ͘ϵϲ ϮϯϰϴϳϬϱ͘ϭϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϱ͘ϵϲ Ϯϯϰϴϲϲϱ͘ϵϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϯ͘ϭϴ Ϯϯϰϴϲϲϲ͘Ϯϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϯ͘ϭϴ Ϯϯϰϴϲϱϯ͘Ϭϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϱ͘ϲϮ Ϯϯϰϴϲϱϯ͘ϰϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϱ͘Ϯϳ ϮϯϰϴϲϰϮ͘Ϯϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϭ͘ϴϬ Ϯϯϰϴϲϰϭ͘ϱϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϮ͘ϭϰ Ϯϯϰϴϱϵϭ͘Ϯϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϯ͘ϭϴ ϮϯϰϴϱϵϬ͘ϵϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϯ͘ϭϴ Ϯϯϰϴϱϲϵ͘ϳϮ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϬϯ͘ϭϴ ϮϯϰϴϱϳϬ͘ϳϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϬϯ͘ϭϴ Ϯϯϰϴϱϳϵ͘Ϭϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϵϮ͘ϰϮ Ϯϯϰϴϱϳϵ͘ϰϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϵϯ͘ϭϮ Ϯϯϰϴϱϵϴ͘ϱϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϴϵ͘ϵϵ Ϯϯϰϴϱϵϵ͘ϱϴ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϴϵ͘ϲϰ ϮϯϰϴϲϮϵ͘Ϭϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϮϳ͘ϴϰ ϮϯϰϴϲϮϵ͘ϳϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϮϴ͘ϭϴ Ϯϯϰϴϲϭϳ͘ϵϴ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϰϱ͘ϴϵ Ϯϯϰϴϲϭϳ͘Ϯϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϰϱ͘ϴϵ Ϯϯϰϴϲϯϰ͘ϲϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϱϲ͘ϯϭ Ϯϯϰϴϲϯϯ͘ϵϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϱϱ͘ϵϲ ϮϯϰϴϲϯϬ͘ϭϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϲϲ͘ϳϯ ϮϯϰϴϲϯϬ͘ϭϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϲϲ͘ϯϴ ϮϯϰϴϲϮϳ͘Ϭϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϳϴ͘ϭϴ ϮϯϰϴϲϮϲ͘ϯϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϳϴ͘ϭϴ Ϯϯϰϴϲϯϭ͘ϭϳ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϴϵ͘ϯϬ ϮϯϰϴϲϯϬ͘ϰϴ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϴϴ͘ϲϬ ϮϯϰϴϲϮϳ͘Ϭϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϬϳ͘ϯϱ ϮϯϰϴϲϮϲ͘ϯϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϬϴ͘Ϭϱ ϮϯϰϴϲϯϬ͘ϴϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϭϴ͘ϴϭ ϮϯϰϴϲϯϬ͘ϴϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϭϴ͘ϴϭ ϮϯϰϴϲϮϳ͘Ϭϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϯϬ͘Ϯϳ ϮϯϰϴϲϮϳ͘Ϭϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϮϵ͘ϵϮ ϮϯϰϴϲϯϬ͘ϭϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϯϳ͘ϵϭ ϮϯϰϴϲϯϬ͘ϭϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϰϬ͘ϲϴ Ϯϯϰϴϲϯϯ͘Ϯϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϰϬ͘ϯϰ Ϯϯϰϴϲϰϭ͘Ϯϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϰϬ͘ϲϴ Ϯϯϰϴϳϰϱ͘ϳϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϰϲ͘ϵϯ Ϯϯϰϴϳϰϱ͘ϳϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϰϲ͘ϵϯ Ϯϯϰϴϳϱϯ͘Ϭϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϯϲ͘ϱϮ ϮϯϰϴϳϲϮ͘ϳϳ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϯϬ͘ϲϮ ϮϯϰϴϳϲϮ͘ϳϳ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϯϬ͘Ϯϳ Ϯϯϰϴϳϱϵ͘ϵϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϵϵ͘ϬϮ ϮϯϰϴϳϲϬ͘ϲϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϵϴ͘ϲϳ Ϯϯϰϴϳϱϲ͘ϱϮ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϴϵ͘ϯϬ Ϯϯϰϴϳϱϲ͘ϱϮ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϴϵ͘ϯϬ Ϯϯϰϴϳϲϭ͘Ϭϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϱϳ͘ϳϬ ϮϯϰϴϳϲϬ͘ϲϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϱϳ͘ϯϱ Ϯϯϰϴϳϱϳ͘ϱϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϰϲ͘ϵϯ Ϯϯϰϴϳϱϳ͘ϱϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϰϲ͘ϱϵ Ϯϯϰϴϳϳϯ͘ϴϴ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϮϵ͘Ϯϯ Ϯϯϰϴϳϳϰ͘ϱϴ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϮϴ͘ϴϴ ϮϯϰϴϳϲϮ͘Ϭϴ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϵϬ͘ϯϰ ϮϯϰϴϳϲϮ͘ϰϮ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϵϬ͘ϯϰ Ϯϯϰϴϳϵϯ͘ϯϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϬϮ͘ϭϰ Ϯϯϰϴϳϵϯ͘ϯϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ h/>/E'h/>/E'ϬϬϬϬϯ dž Ϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ă ϲϮϭϭϴϬϱ͘ϲϮ Ϯϯϰϴϴϳϯ͘ϴϴ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϮϬ͘ϱϱ Ϯϯϰϴϴϳϰ͘Ϯϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϯϮ͘ϳϬ Ϯϯϰϴϴϳϰ͘Ϯϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϯϮ͘ϬϬ ϮϯϰϴϴϳϮ͘ϴϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϲ͘ϳϯ ϮϯϰϴϴϳϮ͘ϰϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϳ͘ϰϮ ϮϯϰϴϴϳϬ͘Ϭϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϵ͘ϴϱ ϮϯϰϴϴϳϬ͘ϳϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϳϬ͘ϮϬ Ϯϯϰϴϴϱϳ͘ϮϮ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϳ͘ϰϮ Ϯϯϰϴϴϱϲ͘ϴϳ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ hƌďĂŶƌŽƐƐƌŽĂĚƐ͕/ŶĐ͘ EĂŵĞ ^Ğů͘D͘/ZZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ ďƐŽƌƉƚŝŽŶ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƐ ĞŐŝŶ dž LJ nj 'ƌŽƵŶĚ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϳ͘ϳϳ Ϯϯϰϴϴϱϰ͘ϳϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϭ͘ϱϮ Ϯϯϰϴϴϱϱ͘ϭϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϬ͘ϴϮ Ϯϯϰϴϴϭϳ͘ϲϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϳ͘ϰϮ Ϯϯϰϴϴϭϳ͘Ϯϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϳ͘ϳϳ Ϯϯϰϴϴϭϱ͘ϵϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϳϬ͘ϱϱ Ϯϯϰϴϴϭϱ͘ϵϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϳϬ͘ϱϱ ϮϯϰϴϴϬϭ͘ϯϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϳ͘Ϭϳ ϮϯϰϴϴϬϭ͘ϯϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϳ͘ϰϮ Ϯϯϰϴϳϵϳ͘ϰϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϵ͘ϴϱ Ϯϯϰϴϳϵϳ͘ϴϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϳϬ͘ϮϬ Ϯϯϰϴϳϴϯ͘ϵϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϲ͘ϳϯ Ϯϯϰϴϳϴϰ͘ϵϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϲ͘ϯϴ ϮϯϰϴϳϴϮ͘ϱϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϭ͘ϭϳ ϮϯϰϴϳϴϮ͘ϱϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϭ͘ϱϮ Ϯϯϰϴϳϳϵ͘ϰϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϱϴ͘ϯϵ Ϯϯϰϴϳϳϳ͘ϯϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϱϴ͘ϯϵ ϮϯϰϴϳϳϬ͘ϰϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϬ͘ϰϴ Ϯϯϰϴϳϲϴ͘ϲϳ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϬ͘ϰϴ Ϯϯϰϴϳϲϱ͘ϱϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϭ͘ϭϳ Ϯϯϰϴϳϲϱ͘ϱϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϬ͘ϰϴ Ϯϯϰϴϳϲϯ͘ϴϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϴ͘ϴϭ Ϯϯϰϴϳϲϰ͘ϴϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϴ͘ϴϭ ϮϯϰϴϳϮϮ͘ϭϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϲ͘ϯϴ ϮϯϰϴϳϮϮ͘ϴϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϳ͘Ϭϳ Ϯϯϰϴϳϭϵ͘ϬϮ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϱϰ͘ϱϳ Ϯϯϰϴϳϭϵ͘ϯϳ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϱϰ͘ϱϳ ϮϯϰϴϳϮϯ͘ϭϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϯϮ͘ϯϱ ϮϯϰϴϳϮϮ͘ϴϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϯϮ͘ϯϱ ϮϯϰϴϳϮϱ͘ϲϮ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϬϵ͘ϰϯ ϮϯϰϴϳϮϱ͘Ϯϳ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϬϵ͘Ϭϵ ϮϯϰϴϳϮϭ͘ϴϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϲ͘ϱϵ ϮϯϰϴϳϮϭ͘ϴϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϲ͘ϵϯ ϮϯϰϴϳϮϱ͘Ϯϳ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϱ͘ϱϱ ϮϯϰϴϳϮϱ͘ϲϮ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϲ͘Ϯϰ Ϯϯϰϴϳϲϱ͘ϵϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϬϲ͘ϲϲ Ϯϯϰϴϳϲϱ͘ϵϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϬϲ͘ϲϲ Ϯϯϰϴϳϳϰ͘ϵϮ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϬϯ͘ϱϯ Ϯϯϰϴϳϳϰ͘ϱϴ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϬϯ͘ϱϯ ϮϯϰϴϳϴϮ͘ϱϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϲ͘ϵϯ ϮϯϰϴϳϴϮ͘ϱϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϲ͘ϵϯ Ϯϯϰϴϳϴϰ͘ϲϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϰ͘ϭϲ Ϯϯϰϴϳϴϰ͘ϯϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϯ͘ϴϭ Ϯϯϰϴϳϵϳ͘ϴϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϳ͘ϲϯ Ϯϯϰϴϳϵϴ͘ϱϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϳ͘ϲϯ ϮϯϰϴϴϬϮ͘ϯϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϰ͘ϱϬ ϮϯϰϴϴϬϯ͘Ϭϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϰ͘ϴϱ Ϯϯϰϴϴϭϱ͘ϮϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϲ͘ϱϵ Ϯϯϰϴϴϭϰ͘ϴϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϲ͘ϵϯ Ϯϯϰϴϴϭϳ͘Ϯϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϬϯ͘ϱϯ Ϯϯϰϴϴϭϲ͘ϵϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϬϮ͘ϰϵ Ϯϯϰϴϴϱϯ͘ϰϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϳ͘ϲϯ Ϯϯϰϴϴϱϯ͘ϰϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϳ͘ϲϯ Ϯϯϰϴϴϱϱ͘ϰϴ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϰ͘ϴϱ Ϯϯϰϴϴϱϱ͘ϭϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϰ͘ϴϱ Ϯϯϰϴϴϲϴ͘ϲϳ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϳ͘ϲϯ Ϯϯϰϴϴϲϴ͘ϲϳ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϳ͘Ϯϴ ϮϯϰϴϴϳϬ͘Ϭϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϬϱ͘Ϯϳ Ϯϯϰϴϴϲϵ͘ϳϮ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ h/>/E'h/>/E'ϬϬϬϬϰ dž Ϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ă ϲϮϭϭϳϵϲ͘ϱϵ ϮϯϰϴϲϮϮ͘ϭϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϬϴ͘ϯϵ ϮϯϰϴϲϮϯ͘ϱϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϬϵ͘Ϭϵ Ϯϯϰϴϲϭϴ͘ϲϳ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϯϭ͘ϯϭ Ϯϯϰϴϲϭϴ͘ϲϳ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϯϭ͘ϲϲ ϮϯϰϴϲϮϮ͘ϰϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϱϯ͘ϴϴ ϮϯϰϴϲϮϮ͘ϭϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϱϰ͘Ϯϯ ϮϯϰϴϲϮϱ͘Ϯϳ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϲ͘ϳϯ ϮϯϰϴϲϮϰ͘Ϯϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϲ͘ϯϴ ϮϯϰϴϲϮϭ͘ϭϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϳ͘ϳϳ ϮϯϰϴϲϮϭ͘ϴϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϲ͘ϳϯ ϮϯϰϴϱϴϬ͘ϰϴ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϬ͘ϭϯ ϮϯϰϴϱϴϬ͘ϰϴ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϬ͘ϰϴ Ϯϯϰϴϱϲϭ͘Ϭϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϲ͘ϯϴ Ϯϯϰϴϱϲϭ͘Ϭϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϲ͘ϯϴ Ϯϯϰϴϱϱϴ͘ϵϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϴ͘ϴϭ Ϯϯϰϴϱϱϵ͘ϯϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϴ͘ϴϭ Ϯϯϰϴϱϰϱ͘ϰϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϲ͘ϯϴ Ϯϯϰϴϱϰϱ͘Ϭϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϲ͘ϳϯ ϮϯϰϴϱϰϮ͘Ϯϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ hƌďĂŶƌŽƐƐƌŽĂĚƐ͕/ŶĐ͘ EĂŵĞ ^Ğů͘D͘/ZZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ ďƐŽƌƉƚŝŽŶ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƐ ĞŐŝŶ dž LJ nj 'ƌŽƵŶĚ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϴ͘ϴϭ Ϯϯϰϴϱϰϭ͘ϵϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϵ͘ϭϲ ϮϯϰϴϱϮϴ͘ϰϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϲ͘Ϭϯ ϮϯϰϴϱϮϴ͘ϳϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϲ͘Ϭϯ ϮϯϰϴϱϮϳ͘Ϭϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϱϵ͘ϰϯ ϮϯϰϴϱϮϳ͘ϯϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϬ͘ϭϯ Ϯϯϰϴϰϴϴ͘ϴϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϱ͘ϲϴ Ϯϯϰϴϰϴϴ͘ϴϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϲ͘Ϭϯ Ϯϯϰϴϰϴϲ͘ϳϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϴ͘ϰϲ Ϯϯϰϴϰϴϳ͘ϰϮ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϴ͘ϰϲ Ϯϯϰϴϰϳϯ͘ϭϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϱ͘ϲϴ Ϯϯϰϴϰϳϯ͘ϱϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϱ͘ϲϴ ϮϯϰϴϰϳϮ͘ϭϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϯϬ͘Ϯϳ ϮϯϰϴϰϳϮ͘ϭϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϯϬ͘ϲϮ Ϯϯϰϴϰϲϵ͘ϯϳ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϭϵ͘ϱϬ Ϯϯϰϴϰϲϵ͘ϳϮ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϭϵ͘ϭϲ ϮϯϰϴϰϳϬ͘ϳϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϬϮ͘ϴϰ ϮϯϰϴϰϳϬ͘ϳϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϬϯ͘ϭϴ Ϯϯϰϴϰϳϰ͘Ϯϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϱ͘ϴϵ Ϯϯϰϴϰϳϰ͘Ϯϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϱ͘ϴϵ Ϯϯϰϴϰϳϱ͘ϵϳ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϮ͘ϳϳ Ϯϯϰϴϰϳϱ͘ϵϳ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϮ͘ϳϳ Ϯϯϰϴϰϴϵ͘ϱϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϱ͘ϴϵ Ϯϯϰϴϰϴϵ͘ϱϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϱ͘ϴϵ Ϯϯϰϴϰϵϭ͘Ϯϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϬϭ͘ϴϬ ϮϯϰϴϰϵϬ͘ϵϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϬϮ͘ϭϰ ϮϯϰϴϱϮϲ͘ϲϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϲ͘ϵϯ ϮϯϰϴϱϮϲ͘ϲϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϲ͘ϱϵ ϮϯϰϴϱϮϵ͘Ϭϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϯ͘ϰϲ ϮϯϰϴϱϮϵ͘Ϭϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϯ͘ϰϲ Ϯϯϰϴϱϰϭ͘ϱϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϲ͘ϵϯ ϮϯϰϴϱϰϮ͘Ϯϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϲ͘ϱϵ Ϯϯϰϴϱϰϰ͘ϬϮ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϲ͘Ϯϰ Ϯϯϰϴϱϰϲ͘ϰϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϯ͘ϰϲ Ϯϯϰϴϱϰϳ͘ϭϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϯ͘ϴϭ Ϯϯϰϴϱϱϵ͘ϵϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϲ͘Ϯϰ Ϯϯϰϴϱϱϵ͘ϵϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϱ͘ϮϬ Ϯϯϰϴϱϲϭ͘ϳϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϬϮ͘ϴϰ Ϯϯϰϴϱϲϭ͘Ϭϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϬϮ͘ϴϰ Ϯϯϰϴϱϲϵ͘ϯϳ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϬϱ͘ϲϮ Ϯϯϰϴϱϲϵ͘ϯϳ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϬϱ͘ϲϮ Ϯϯϰϴϱϳϴ͘Ϭϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϱ͘ϮϬ Ϯϯϰϴϱϳϴ͘Ϭϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϱ͘ϱϱ Ϯϯϰϴϲϭϵ͘ϬϮ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϳ͘Ϯϴ Ϯϯϰϴϲϭϵ͘ϬϮ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ h/>/E'h/>/E'ϬϬϬϬϱ dž Ϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ă ϲϮϭϭϴϱϬ͘ϰϭ Ϯϯϰϴϰϰϭ͘ϵϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϱϯ͘ϭϴ ϮϯϰϴϰϰϬ͘ϱϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϱϮ͘ϰϵ ϮϯϰϴϰϮϴ͘ϰϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϱϬ͘Ϭϲ ϮϯϰϴϰϮϴ͘ϳϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϱϬ͘Ϭϲ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϱ͘ϴϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϱϭ͘ϭϬ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϱ͘ϰϴ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϱϭ͘ϴϬ ϮϯϰϴϯϴϮ͘ϱϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϱϱ͘ϲϮ ϮϯϰϴϯϴϮ͘ϵϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϱϱ͘ϵϲ ϮϯϰϴϯϳϬ͘ϰϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϱϮ͘ϭϰ ϮϯϰϴϯϳϬ͘ϰϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϱϮ͘ϭϰ Ϯϯϰϴϯϲϵ͘ϳϮ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϭϭ͘ϴϳ Ϯϯϰϴϯϲϵ͘ϯϳ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϭϭ͘ϭϳ Ϯϯϰϴϯϳϳ͘ϯϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϮ͘Ϭϳ Ϯϯϰϴϯϳϲ͘ϯϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϭ͘ϳϯ ϮϯϰϴϯϳϬ͘Ϭϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϬ͘ϯϰ ϮϯϰϴϯϳϬ͘Ϭϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϬ͘ϯϰ Ϯϯϰϴϯϲϳ͘ϵϴ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϳϲ͘ϭϬ Ϯϯϰϴϯϲϳ͘ϲϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϳϲ͘ϰϱ ϮϯϰϴϯϳϬ͘ϳϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϳϮ͘ϵϴ ϮϯϰϴϯϳϬ͘ϳϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϳϮ͘ϲϯ Ϯϯϰϴϯϲϳ͘ϵϴ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϱϵ͘Ϭϵ Ϯϯϰϴϯϲϴ͘ϲϳ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϱϵ͘ϰϯ ϮϯϰϴϯϳϬ͘ϳϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϱϴ͘Ϭϱ ϮϯϰϴϯϳϬ͘ϳϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϱϴ͘ϯϵ Ϯϯϰϴϯϳϳ͘ϯϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϮϬ͘ϮϬ Ϯϯϰϴϯϳϳ͘ϳϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϭϵ͘ϴϱ ϮϯϰϴϯϳϬ͘ϳϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϭϴ͘ϰϲ Ϯϯϰϴϯϳϭ͘ϭϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϭϴ͘ϭϮ Ϯϯϰϴϯϲϳ͘ϵϴ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϯ͘ϴϴ Ϯϯϰϴϯϲϳ͘ϵϴ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϰ͘Ϯϯ Ϯϯϰϴϯϳϭ͘ϭϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϮ͘ϭϰ ϮϯϰϴϯϳϬ͘ϳϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϮ͘ϴϰ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϲ͘ϭϳ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ hƌďĂŶƌŽƐƐƌŽĂĚƐ͕/ŶĐ͘ EĂŵĞ ^Ğů͘D͘/ZZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ ďƐŽƌƉƚŝŽŶ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƐ ĞŐŝŶ dž LJ nj 'ƌŽƵŶĚ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϬ͘ϰϭ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϱ͘ϴϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϬ͘Ϭϲ Ϯϯϰϴϰϭϳ͘ϲϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϭ͘ϴϬ Ϯϯϰϴϰϭϳ͘ϲϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϮ͘ϭϰ Ϯϯϰϴϰϯϯ͘ϵϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϱ͘ϲϮ Ϯϯϰϴϰϯϯ͘ϵϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϱ͘Ϯϳ ϮϯϰϴϰϰϬ͘ϵϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϳ͘ϬϬ ϮϯϰϴϰϰϬ͘ϵϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϬϳ͘ϬϬ Ϯϯϰϴϰϰϰ͘ϬϮ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϮϬ͘ϴϵ Ϯϯϰϴϰϰϯ͘ϯϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϮϬ͘ϴϵ Ϯϯϰϴϰϰϭ͘ϱϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϮϭ͘ϵϯ Ϯϯϰϴϰϰϭ͘Ϯϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϮϭ͘ϵϯ Ϯϯϰϴϰϯϱ͘ϯϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϱϴ͘Ϭϱ Ϯϯϰϴϰϯϰ͘ϲϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϱϴ͘Ϭϱ ϮϯϰϴϰϰϬ͘ϵϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϱϵ͘ϰϯ ϮϯϰϴϰϰϬ͘ϵϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϱϵ͘Ϭϵ Ϯϯϰϴϰϰϯ͘ϲϳ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϳϯ͘ϯϮ Ϯϯϰϴϰϰϯ͘ϲϳ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϳϯ͘ϲϳ Ϯϯϰϴϰϰϭ͘Ϯϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϳϲ͘ϰϱ Ϯϯϰϴϰϰϭ͘Ϯϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϳϲ͘ϴϬ Ϯϯϰϴϰϰϰ͘ϬϮ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϬ͘ϲϴ Ϯϯϰϴϰϰϰ͘ϳϮ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϬ͘ϲϴ ϮϯϰϴϰϰϬ͘ϵϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϮ͘ϰϮ ϮϯϰϴϰϰϬ͘ϵϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϮ͘ϳϳ Ϯϯϰϴϰϯϰ͘ϲϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϬϬ͘Ϭϲ Ϯϯϰϴϰϯϰ͘ϵϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϵϵ͘ϳϭ ϮϯϰϴϰϯϬ͘ϴϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϬϵ͘Ϭϵ ϮϯϰϴϰϯϬ͘ϴϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϬϴ͘ϳϰ ϮϯϰϴϰϰϮ͘Ϯϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ h/>/E'h/>/E'ϬϬϬϬϲ dž Ϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ă ϲϮϭϭϲϲϳ͘Ϭϳ ϮϯϰϴϰϰϬ͘ϵϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϲϲ͘ϳϯ Ϯϯϰϴϰϯϯ͘Ϯϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϲϵ͘ϴϱ ϮϯϰϴϰϯϮ͘ϱϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϳϬ͘ϮϬ Ϯϯϰϴϰϭϲ͘ϵϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϳϬ͘ϴϵ Ϯϯϰϴϰϭϳ͘Ϯϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϳϭ͘Ϯϰ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϱ͘ϴϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϲϴ͘ϴϭ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϱ͘ϴϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϲϵ͘ϭϲ Ϯϯϰϴϯϳϭ͘ϴϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϲϳ͘ϳϳ ϮϯϰϴϯϳϮ͘ϭϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϲϳ͘ϰϮ Ϯϯϰϴϯϲϴ͘ϯϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϱϰ͘ϱϳ Ϯϯϰϴϯϲϳ͘ϵϴ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϱϰ͘Ϯϯ ϮϯϰϴϯϳϬ͘ϳϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϱϮ͘ϰϵ ϮϯϰϴϯϳϬ͘ϳϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϱϮ͘ϭϰ Ϯϯϰϴϯϳϳ͘Ϭϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϭϯ͘ϲϬ Ϯϯϰϴϯϳϲ͘ϲϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϭϯ͘ϲϬ ϮϯϰϴϯϳϬ͘ϳϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϭϮ͘ϵϭ ϮϯϰϴϯϳϬ͘ϳϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϭϯ͘Ϯϱ Ϯϯϰϴϯϲϳ͘ϵϴ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϵϴ͘ϯϮ Ϯϯϰϴϯϲϳ͘ϵϴ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϵϴ͘ϯϮ Ϯϯϰϴϯϳϭ͘ϭϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϵϰ͘ϴϱ Ϯϯϰϴϯϳϭ͘ϭϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϵϱ͘ϮϬ Ϯϯϰϴϯϲϳ͘ϵϴ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϴϰ͘Ϭϵ Ϯϯϰϴϯϲϳ͘ϵϴ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϴϬ͘ϵϲ Ϯϯϰϴϯϲϴ͘ϯϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϴϬ͘ϵϲ Ϯϯϰϴϯϳϭ͘ϰϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϳϵ͘ϵϮ Ϯϯϰϴϯϳϭ͘ϴϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϴϬ͘Ϯϳ Ϯϯϰϴϯϳϳ͘ϯϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϲϬ͘ϰϴ Ϯϯϰϴϯϳϳ͘ϳϬ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϲϬ͘ϰϴ ϮϯϰϴϯϳϬ͘Ϭϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϭϵ͘ϭϲ ϮϯϰϴϯϳϬ͘Ϭϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϭϴ͘ϴϭ Ϯϯϰϴϯϳϭ͘ϭϭ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϭϱ͘ϲϴ Ϯϯϰϴϯϳϭ͘ϰϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϭϲ͘Ϭϯ Ϯϯϰϴϯϴϯ͘ϵϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϭϵ͘ϱϬ Ϯϯϰϴϯϴϯ͘Ϯϲ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϭϴ͘ϴϭ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϲ͘ϭϳ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϮϮ͘Ϯϴ ϮϯϰϴϰϬϲ͘ϱϮ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϮϮ͘Ϯϴ ϮϯϰϴϰϯϬ͘ϭϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϭϵ͘ϭϲ ϮϯϰϴϰϯϬ͘ϭϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϭϵ͘ϱϬ ϮϯϰϴϰϰϮ͘ϲϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϮϵ͘Ϯϯ ϮϯϰϴϰϰϮ͘ϵϴ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϲϯ͘Ϯϱ ϮϯϰϴϰϰϮ͘ϲϯ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϲϯ͘Ϯϱ ϮϯϰϴϰϯϮ͘ϮϮ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϳϮ͘Ϯϴ ϮϯϰϴϰϯϮ͘ϮϮ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϳϭ͘ϵϯ Ϯϯϰϴϰϯϱ͘ϯϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϴϬ͘Ϯϳ Ϯϯϰϴϰϯϱ͘ϲϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϴϬ͘ϲϮ Ϯϯϰϴϰϰϭ͘ϱϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϴϭ͘ϲϲ Ϯϯϰϴϰϰϭ͘ϱϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϴϭ͘ϲϲ Ϯϯϰϴϰϰϰ͘ϯϳ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϵϱ͘ϴϵ Ϯϯϰϴϰϰϰ͘ϬϮ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ hƌďĂŶƌŽƐƐƌŽĂĚƐ͕/ŶĐ͘ EĂŵĞ ^Ğů͘D͘/ZZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ ďƐŽƌƉƚŝŽŶ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƐ ĞŐŝŶ dž LJ nj 'ƌŽƵŶĚ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ϲϮϭϭϱϵϱ͘ϴϵ Ϯϯϰϴϰϰϭ͘ϵϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϵϵ͘ϬϮ Ϯϯϰϴϰϰϭ͘ϱϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϵϵ͘ϬϮ Ϯϯϰϴϰϰϰ͘ϳϮ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϭϯ͘Ϯϱ Ϯϯϰϴϰϰϰ͘ϬϮ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϭϮ͘ϵϭ Ϯϯϰϴϰϰϭ͘Ϯϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϭϯ͘ϵϱ Ϯϯϰϴϰϰϭ͘Ϯϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϭϯ͘ϵϱ Ϯϯϰϴϰϯϱ͘ϯϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϱϬ͘ϳϱ Ϯϯϰϴϰϯϰ͘ϵϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϱϬ͘ϰϭ Ϯϯϰϴϰϰϭ͘Ϯϰ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϱϮ͘ϭϰ Ϯϯϰϴϰϰϭ͘ϱϵ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϱϭ͘ϰϱ Ϯϯϰϴϰϰϰ͘ϯϳ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϲϱ͘ϲϴ Ϯϯϰϴϰϰϯ͘ϲϳ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϲϰ͘ϵϵ ϮϯϰϴϰϰϬ͘ϱϱ ϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ 'ƌŽƵŶĚďƐŽƌƉƚŝŽŶ;ƐͿ EĂŵĞ ^Ğů͘D͘/'ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƐ dž LJ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ŽŶƚŽƵƌ;ƐͿ EĂŵĞ ^Ğů͘D͘/KŶůLJWƚƐ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƐ ĞŐŝŶ ŶĚ dž LJ nj ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ sĞƌƚŝĐĂůƌĞĂ^ŽƵƌĐĞ;ƐͿ EĂŵĞ /,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƐ ĞŐŝŶ ŶĚ dž LJ nj 'ƌŽƵŶĚ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ZĂŝů EĂŵĞ ^Ğů͘D͘/>ǁΖ dƌĂŝŶůĂƐƐ ŽƌƌĞĐƚ͘sŵĂdž ĂLJ EŝŐŚƚ dƌĂĐŬ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;Ŭŵ;ŵƉŚͿ ^ŽƵŶĚ>ĞǀĞů^ƉĞĐƚƌĂ EĂŵĞ /dLJƉĞ KŬƚĂǀĞ^ƉĞĐƚƌƵŵ;ĚͿ ^ŽƵƌĐĞ tĞŝŐŚƚ͘ϯϭ͘ϱ ϲϯ ϭϮϱ ϮϱϬ ϱϬϬ ϭϬϬϬ ϮϬϬϬ ϰϬϬϬ ϴϬϬϬ ůŝŶ ZŽĂĚƐ EĂŵĞ ^Ğů͘D͘/>ŵĞ ŽƵŶƚĂƚĂ ĞdžĂĐƚŽƵŶƚĂƚĂ ^ƉĞĞĚ>ŝŵŝƚ ^^^ƵƌĨĂĐĞ 'ƌĂĚŝĞŶƚ DƵůƚ͘ZĞĨůĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂLJ ǀĞŶŝŶŐ EŝŐŚƚ ds ^ƚƌ͘ĐůĂƐƐ͘D Ɖ;йͿ ƵƚŽ dƌƵĐŬ ŝƐƚ͘ƐƚƌŽ dLJƉĞ ƌĞĨů ,ďƵŝůĚ ŝƐƚ͘ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ĂLJ ǀĞŶŝŶŐ EŝŐŚƚ ĂLJ ǀĞŶŝŶŐ EŝŐŚƚ ;ŵƉŚͿ ;ŵƉŚͿ ;ĚͿ ;йͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ZŽĂĚƐ'ĞŽ EĂŵĞ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƐ ŝƐƚ >^ůŽƉĞ ĞŐŝŶ ŶĚ dž LJ nj 'ƌŽƵŶĚ ;ĨƚͿ ;йͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ hƌďĂŶƌŽƐƐƌŽĂĚƐ͕/ŶĐ͘ I I 111 I I I I I 111 I I I I I I I 11 I I I I I I I I I I 111 1 I I I I I I 111 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx APPENDIX 11.1: CONSTRUCTION NOISE MODEL Maple Apartments Noise Analysis 15975-02 Noise Study.docx This page was intentionally left blank. ϭϱϵϳϱͲDĂƉůĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ ĂĚŶĂEŽŝƐĞWƌĞĚŝĐƚŝŽŶDŽĚĞů͗ϭϱϵϳϱͲϬϮͺŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘ĐŶĂ ĂƚĞ͗Ϭϵ͘Ϭϱ͘Ϯϰ ŶĂůLJƐƚ͗͘DĂĚĚƵdž ĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶŽŶĨŝŐƵƌĂƚŝŽŶ ŽŶĨŝŐƵƌĂƚŝŽŶ WĂƌĂŵĞƚĞƌ sĂůƵĞ 'ĞŶĞƌĂů DĂdž͘ ƌƌŽƌ;ĚͿ Ϭ͘ϬϬ DĂdž͘^ĞĂƌĐŚZĂĚŝƵƐ;η;hŶŝƚ͕> EͿͿ ϮϬϬϬ͘Ϭϭ DŝŶ͘ŝƐƚ^ƌĐƚŽZĐǀƌ Ϭ͘ϬϬ WĂƌƚŝƚŝŽŶ ZĂƐƚĞƌ&ĂĐƚŽƌ Ϭ͘ϱϬ DĂdž͘>ĞŶŐƚŚŽĨ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶ;η;hŶŝƚ͕> EͿͿ ϵϵϵ͘ϵϵ DŝŶ͘>ĞŶŐƚŚŽĨ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶ;η;hŶŝƚ͕> EͿͿ ϭ͘Ϭϭ DŝŶ͘>ĞŶŐƚŚŽĨ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶ;йͿ Ϭ͘ϬϬ WƌŽũ͘>ŝŶĞ^ŽƵƌĐĞƐ KŶ WƌŽũ͘ƌĞĂ^ŽƵƌĐĞƐ KŶ ZĞĨ͘dŝŵĞ ĂLJƚŝŵĞWĞŶĂůƚLJ;ĚͿ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ZĞĐƌ͘dŝŵĞWĞŶĂůƚLJ;ĚͿ ϱ͘ϬϬ EŝŐŚƚͲƚŝŵĞWĞŶĂůƚLJ;ĚͿ ϭϬ͘ϬϬ dD ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚ,ĞŝŐŚƚ;ŵͿ Ϭ͘ϬϬ DŽĚĞůŽĨdĞƌƌĂŝŶ dƌŝĂŶŐƵůĂƚŝŽŶ ZĞĨůĞĐƚŝŽŶ ŵĂdž͘KƌĚĞƌŽĨZĞĨůĞĐƚŝŽŶ Ϯ ^ĞĂƌĐŚZĂĚŝƵƐ^ƌĐ ϭϬϬ͘ϬϬ ^ĞĂƌĐŚZĂĚŝƵƐZĐǀƌ ϭϬϬ͘ϬϬ DĂdž͘ŝƐƚĂŶĐĞ^ŽƵƌĐĞͲZĐǀƌ ϭϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϭϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ DŝŶ͘ŝƐƚĂŶĐĞZǀĐƌͲZĞĨůĞĐƚŽƌ ϭ͘ϬϬϭ͘ϬϬ DŝŶ͘ŝƐƚĂŶĐĞ^ŽƵƌĐĞͲZĞĨůĞĐƚŽƌ Ϭ͘ϭϬ /ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů;/^KϵϲϭϯͿ >ĂƚĞƌĂůŝĨĨƌĂĐƚŝŽŶ ƐŽŵĞKďũ KďƐƚ͘ǁŝƚŚŝŶƌĞĂ^ƌĐĚŽŶŽƚƐŚŝĞůĚ KŶ ^ĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐ /ŶĐů͘'ƌŽƵŶĚƚƚ͘ŽǀĞƌĂƌƌŝĞƌ njǁŝƚŚůŝŵŝƚ;ϮϬͬϮϱͿ ĂƌƌŝĞƌŽĞĨĨŝĐŝĞŶƚƐϭ͕Ϯ͕ϯ ϯ͘ϬϮϬ͘ϬϬ͘Ϭ dĞŵƉĞƌĂƚƵƌĞ;η;hŶŝƚ͕d DWͿͿ ϭϬ ƌĞů͘,ƵŵŝĚŝƚLJ;йͿ ϳϬ 'ƌŽƵŶĚďƐŽƌƉƚŝŽŶ'Ϭ͘ϱϬ tŝŶĚ^ƉĞĞĚĨŽƌŝƌ͘;η;hŶŝƚ͕^W ͿͿ ϯ͘Ϭ ZŽĂĚƐ;dEDͿ ZĂŝůǁĂLJƐ;&dͬ&ZͿ ŝƌĐƌĂĨƚ;͍͍͍Ϳ ^ƚƌŝĐƚůLJĂĐĐ͘ƚŽnj ZĞĐĞŝǀĞƌEŽŝƐĞ>ĞǀĞůƐ EĂŵĞ D͘/>ĞǀĞů>ƌ >ŝŵŝƚ͘sĂůƵĞ >ĂŶĚhƐĞ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƐ ĂLJ EŝŐŚƚ E >ĂLJ EŝŐŚƚ E >dLJƉĞ ƵƚŽ EŽŝƐĞdLJƉĞ y z ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ Zϭ Zϭ ϲϰ͘ϯ Ͳϯϱ͘ϳ ϲϭ͘ϯ Ϭ͘Ϭ Ϭ͘Ϭ Ϭ͘Ϭ dž dŽƚĂů ϱ͘ϬϬ Ă ϲϮϭϭϰϲϯ͘ϳϱ ϮϯϰϵϬϱϱ͘ϳϭ ϱ͘ϬϬ ZϮ ZϮ ϲϰ͘Ϯ Ͳϯϱ͘ϴ ϲϭ͘Ϯ Ϭ͘Ϭ Ϭ͘Ϭ Ϭ͘Ϭ dž dŽƚĂů ϱ͘ϬϬ Ă ϲϮϭϭϳϬϳ͘Ϯϰ ϮϯϰϵϬϱϴ͘ϯϭ ϱ͘ϬϬ Zϯ Zϯ ϲϰ͘ϭ Ͳϯϱ͘ϵ ϲϭ͘ϭ Ϭ͘Ϭ Ϭ͘Ϭ Ϭ͘Ϭ dž dŽƚĂů ϱ͘ϬϬ Ă ϲϮϭϭϵϴϳ͘ϭϵ Ϯϯϰϴϴϵϰ͘Ϯϱ ϱ͘ϬϬ Zϰ Zϰ ϱϴ͘Ϯ Ͳϰϭ͘ϴ ϱϱ͘ϭ Ϭ͘Ϭ Ϭ͘Ϭ Ϭ͘Ϭ dž dŽƚĂů ϱ͘ϬϬ Ă ϲϮϭϮϭϲϬ͘ϯϲ Ϯϯϰϴϭϳϴ͘ϭϬ ϱ͘ϬϬ Zϱ Zϱ ϱϴ͘Ϭ ͲϰϮ͘Ϭ ϱϰ͘ϵ Ϭ͘Ϭ Ϭ͘Ϭ Ϭ͘Ϭ dž dŽƚĂů ϱ͘ϬϬ Ă ϲϮϭϮϬϳϰ͘ϰϯ ϮϯϰϴϬϳϮ͘ϲϯ ϱ͘ϬϬ Zϲ Zϲ ϲϯ͘Ϯ Ͳϯϲ͘ϴ ϲϬ͘Ϯ Ϭ͘Ϭ Ϭ͘Ϭ Ϭ͘Ϭ dž dŽƚĂů ϱ͘ϬϬ Ă ϲϮϭϭϱϱϮ͘Ϯϵ ϮϯϰϴϮϬϮ͘ϴϰ ϱ͘ϬϬ WŽŝŶƚ^ŽƵƌĐĞ;ƐͿ EĂŵĞ D͘/ZĞƐƵůƚ͘Wt>>ǁͬ>ŝ KƉĞƌĂƚŝŶŐdŝŵĞ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƐ ĂLJ ǀĞŶŝŶŐ EŝŐŚƚ dLJƉĞ sĂůƵĞ ŶŽƌŵ͘ĂLJ ^ƉĞĐŝĂů EŝŐŚƚ y z ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ Ě;Ϳ ;ŵŝŶͿ ;ŵŝŶͿ ;ŵŝŶͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ >ŝŶĞ^ŽƵƌĐĞ;ƐͿ EĂŵĞ D͘/ZĞƐƵůƚ͘Wt>ZĞƐƵůƚ͘Wt>Ζ >ǁͬ>ŝ KƉĞƌĂƚŝŶŐdŝŵĞ DŽǀŝŶŐWƚ͘^ƌĐ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ĂLJ ǀĞŶŝŶŐ EŝŐŚƚ ĂLJ ǀĞŶŝŶŐ EŝŐŚƚ dLJƉĞ sĂůƵĞ ŶŽƌŵ͘ĂLJ ^ƉĞĐŝĂů EŝŐŚƚ EƵŵďĞƌ ^ƉĞĞĚ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ Ě;Ϳ ;ŵŝŶͿ ;ŵŝŶͿ ;ŵŝŶͿ ĂLJ ǀĞŶŝŶŐ EŝŐŚƚ ;ŵƉŚͿ ;ĨƚͿ EĂŵĞ /,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƐ ĞŐŝŶ ŶĚ dž LJ nj 'ƌŽƵŶĚ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ƌĞĂ^ŽƵƌĐĞ;ƐͿ hƌďĂŶƌŽƐƐƌŽĂĚƐ͕/ŶĐ͘ I 111 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 111 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I I I I I I I I EĂŵĞ D͘/ZĞƐƵůƚ͘Wt>ZĞƐƵůƚ͘Wt>ΖΖ >ǁͬ>ŝ KƉĞƌĂƚŝŶŐdŝŵĞ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ĂLJ ǀĞŶŝŶŐ EŝŐŚƚ ĂLJ ǀĞŶŝŶŐ EŝŐŚƚ dLJƉĞ sĂůƵĞ ŶŽƌŵ͘ĂLJ ^ƉĞĐŝĂů EŝŐŚƚ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ Ě;Ϳ ;ŵŝŶͿ ;ŵŝŶͿ ;ŵŝŶͿ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶƌĞĂϭ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶƌĞĂϭ ϭϭϲ͘ϲ ϭϲ͘ϲ ϭϲ͘ϲ ϳϭ͘ϯ ͲϮϴ͘ϳ ͲϮϴ͘ϳ Wt>ͲWƚ ϭϭϲ͘ϲ ϴ Ă EĂŵĞ /,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƐ ĞŐŝŶ ŶĚ dž LJ nj 'ƌŽƵŶĚ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶƌĞĂϭ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶƌĞĂϭ ϴ͘ϬϬ Ă ϲϮϭϭϰϯϰ͘ϵϬ Ϯϯϰϴϯϯϳ͘ϯϯ ϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϯϲ͘Ϯϰ ϮϯϰϴϱϮϵ͘ϱϲ ϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϮϲϭ͘ϭϬ Ϯϯϰϴϱϯϭ͘Ϭϭ ϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϮϱϵ͘ϲϰ Ϯϯϰϴϵϱϯ͘ϯϱ ϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϴϱ͘ϱϲ Ϯϯϰϴϵϰϴ͘ϱϳ ϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϵϬϭ͘ϳϳ ϮϯϰϴϵϰϬ͘Ϭϵ ϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϵϬϮ͘ϳϮ Ϯϯϰϴϱϵϲ͘Ϭϭ ϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϵϬϯ͘ϵϬ Ϯϯϰϴϰϳϱ͘ϵϵ ϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϵϬϯ͘Ϯϯ Ϯϯϰϴϯϳϴ͘ϰϭ ϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϴϲϭ͘Ϯϲ Ϯϯϰϴϯϯϲ͘ϰϲ ϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϳϴϴ͘ϵϵ ϮϯϰϴϯϮϲ͘ϴϭ ϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϲϱϮ͘ϳϵ ϮϯϰϴϯϮϳ͘ϴϰ ϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϱϯϰ͘ϳϯ ϮϯϰϴϯϮϴ͘ϳϳ ϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ϲϮϭϭϰϯϰ͘ϴϱ ϮϯϰϴϯϮϵ͘ϱϴ ϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬ ĂƌƌŝĞƌ;ƐͿ EĂŵĞ ^Ğů͘D͘/ďƐŽƌƉƚŝŽŶ Ͳ džƚ͘ĂŶƚŝůĞǀĞƌ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƐ ůĞĨƚ ƌŝŐŚƚ ŚŽƌnj͘ǀĞƌƚ͘ĞŐŝŶ ŶĚ dž LJ nj 'ƌŽƵŶĚ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐ;ƐͿ EĂŵĞ ^Ğů͘D͘/ZZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ ďƐŽƌƉƚŝŽŶ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƐ ĞŐŝŶ dž LJ nj 'ƌŽƵŶĚ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ 'ƌŽƵŶĚďƐŽƌƉƚŝŽŶ;ƐͿ EĂŵĞ ^Ğů͘D͘/'ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƐ dž LJ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ŽŶƚŽƵƌ;ƐͿ EĂŵĞ ^Ğů͘D͘/KŶůLJWƚƐ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƐ ĞŐŝŶ ŶĚ dž LJ nj ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ sĞƌƚŝĐĂůƌĞĂ^ŽƵƌĐĞ;ƐͿ EĂŵĞ /,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƐ ĞŐŝŶ ŶĚ dž LJ nj 'ƌŽƵŶĚ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ZĂŝů EĂŵĞ ^Ğů͘D͘/>ǁΖ dƌĂŝŶůĂƐƐ ŽƌƌĞĐƚ͘sŵĂdž ĂLJ EŝŐŚƚ dƌĂĐŬ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;Ŭŵ;ŵƉŚͿ ^ŽƵŶĚ>ĞǀĞů^ƉĞĐƚƌĂ EĂŵĞ /dLJƉĞ KŬƚĂǀĞ^ƉĞĐƚƌƵŵ;ĚͿ ^ŽƵƌĐĞ tĞŝŐŚƚ͘ϯϭ͘ϱ ϲϯ ϭϮϱ ϮϱϬ ϱϬϬ ϭϬϬϬ ϮϬϬϬ ϰϬϬϬ ϴϬϬϬ ůŝŶ ZŽĂĚƐ EĂŵĞ ^Ğů͘D͘/>ŵĞ ŽƵŶƚĂƚĂ ĞdžĂĐƚŽƵŶƚĂƚĂ ^ƉĞĞĚ>ŝŵŝƚ ^^^ƵƌĨĂĐĞ 'ƌĂĚŝĞŶƚ DƵůƚ͘ZĞĨůĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂLJ ǀĞŶŝŶŐ EŝŐŚƚ ds ^ƚƌ͘ĐůĂƐƐ͘D Ɖ;йͿ ƵƚŽ dƌƵĐŬ ŝƐƚ͘ƐƚƌŽ dLJƉĞ ƌĞĨů ,ďƵŝůĚ ŝƐƚ͘ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĚͿ ĂLJ ǀĞŶŝŶŐ EŝŐŚƚ ĂLJ ǀĞŶŝŶŐ EŝŐŚƚ ;ŵƉŚͿ ;ŵƉŚͿ ;ĚͿ ;йͿ ;ĚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ZŽĂĚƐ'ĞŽ EĂŵĞ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƐ ŝƐƚ >^ůŽƉĞ ĞŐŝŶ ŶĚ dž LJ nj 'ƌŽƵŶĚ ;ĨƚͿ ;йͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ ;ĨƚͿ hƌďĂŶƌŽƐƐƌŽĂĚƐ͕/ŶĐ͘ I I 111 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1111 I I I 1 1 1 I I I 111 I I I I I 111 I I I I I I I 11 I I I I I I I I I I 111 1 I I I I I I 111 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I