HomeMy WebLinkAboutMitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRA Enclave)MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
ENCLAVE AT NORTH FONTANA PROJECT
This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared for use in implementing
mitigation for the Enclave at North Fontana Project, Master Case No. 24-0026, 24-002TTM and 24-
001DRP. The program has been prepared in compliance with State law and the Mitigated Negative
Declaration (MND) prepared for the Enclave at North Fontana Project (project) by the City of Fontana
(City).
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires adoption of a reporting or monitoring
program for those measures placed on a project to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the
environment (Public Resource Code Section 21081.6). The law states the reporting or monitoring
program shall be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation.
The monitoring program contains the following elements:
1) The mitigation measures are recorded with the action and procedure necessary to ensure
compliance. In some instances, one action may be used to verify implementation of several
mitigation measures.
2) A procedure for compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This
procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and
when compliance will be reported.
3) The program has been designed to be flexible. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance
procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the
program. As changes are made, new monitoring compliance procedures and records will be
developed and incorporated into the program.
This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program includes mitigation identified in the MND.
MITIGATION MONITORING AND RESPONSIBILITIES
As the Lead Agency, the City is responsible for ensuring full compliance with the mitigation measures
adopted for the proposed project. The City will monitor and report on all mitigation activities.
Mitigation measures will be implemented at different stages of development throughout the project
site. In this regard, the responsibilities for implementation have been assigned to the Applicant,
Contractor, or a combination thereof. If during the course of project implementation, any of the
mitigation measures identified herein cannot be successfully implemented, the City shall be
immediately informed, and the City will then inform any affected responsible agencies. The City, in
conjunction with any affected responsible agencies, will then determine if modification to the project
is required and/or whether alternative mitigation is appropriate.
STANDARD CONDITIONS
Standard Conditions are presented in instances where the proposed project would not create a
significant impact but would be required to adhere to regulatory requirements in order to ensure
impacts do not become significant. Standard Conditions outline compliance with various federal,
State, and/or local acts, laws, rules, regulations, municipal codes, etc.
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
ENCLAVE AT NORTH FONTANA PROJECT
11/20/25 (P:\2025\20252531 - Enclave at North Fontana\PRODUCT\ISMND\MMRP\MMRP Enclave at North Fontana Project.docx) 2
Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program for the Enclave at North Fontana Project
Mitigation Measure Implementation Monitoring Notes/Initials
4.1 Aesthetics
There are no Mitigation Measures that address impacts related to aesthetics.
4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources
There are no Mitigation Measures that address impacts related to Agriculture and Forestry Resources.
4.3 Air Quality
Mitigation Measure AIR-1: During
construction of the proposed project, the
project contractor shall ensure all off-
road, diesel-powered construction
equipment of 50 horsepower or more
used for the project construction meets,
at a minimum, the California Air
Resources Board Tier 2 emissions
standards equipped with Level 3 diesel
particulate filters or the equivalent.
Responsible Party(s)
Contractor, City of
Fontana Community
Development Director or
designee, and/or
Planning Department, or
designee
Implementation Phase
During construction.
Responsible Party(s)
City of Fontana Community
Development Director or
designee, and/or Planning
Department, or designee
Monitoring Period
During construction
Method of Verification
Inspection to ensure construction
equipment in use is rated by the
U.S. EPA as having Tier 2 or
stricter emission limits, equipped
with Level 3 diesel particulate
filters or the equivalent.
4.4 Biological Resources
Mitigation Measure BIO-1
Preconstruction surveys for burrowing
owl shall be conducted prior to
vegetation clearing or grading of the
residential development site. Two
surveys are required and shall follow the
methods described in the California
Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW’s)
Staff Report on Burrowing Owl
Mitigation. The first survey shall be
conducted between 30 and 14 days
before initial ground disturbance
(grading, grubbing, and construction),
and the second survey shall be conducted
no more than 24 hours prior to initial
ground disturbance. If burrowing owls
and/or suitable burrowing owl burrows
are identified on the residential
development site during the survey, the
project applicant(s) shall consult with
CDFW and follow the methods listed in
the CDFW’s Staff Report on Burrowing
Owl Mitigation for avoidance and/or
passive relocation.
If burrowing owls or suitable burrowing
owl burrows with sign (e.g., whitewash,
pellets, feathers, prey remains) are
identified on the residential development
Responsible Party(s)
Applicant / Qualified
Biologist
Implementation Phase
Prior to the start of
vegetation clearing or
grading activities and
during vegetation
clearing and grading
activities
Responsible Party(s)
City of Fontana Community
Development Director or
designee, and/or Planning
Department, or designee
Monitoring Period
Prior to the start of vegetation
clearing or grading activities and
during vegetation clearing and
grading activities
Method of Verification
Evidence provided to the City
that:
A qualified biologist is
retained;
The required pre-construction
surveys are completed;
If necessary, a burrowing owl
protection and relocation
program is established and
submitted to the CDFW and
USFWS for review and
approval;
Appropriate avoidance buffers
are established; and
Required and applicable
provisions of the burrowing
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
ENCLAVE AT NORTH FONTANA PROJECT
11/20/25 (P:\2025\20252531 - Enclave at North Fontana\PRODUCT\ISMND\MMRP\MMRP Enclave at North Fontana Project.docx) 3
Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program for the Enclave at North Fontana Project
Mitigation Measure Implementation Monitoring Notes/Initials
site during the survey(s), these features
must be completely avoided. If impacts
to those features are unavoidable, then
the project applicant(s) must develop a
burrowing owl mitigation plan in
consultation with CDFW. Mitigation
methods may include passive relocation
conducted outside of the owl breeding
season (between September 1 and
February 28). If an active owl burrow is
identified, and construction is to proceed,
then a qualified biologist (with two or
more years of burrowing owl experience)
must establish an initial disturbance-limit
buffer of 500 feet around the burrow
using flagging or staking. The buffer
distance may be reduced in coordination
with CDFW depending on time of year
(i.e., in or out of breeding season), level
of construction activity, and observed
behavior of the burrowing owls.
Construction activities shall not occur
within any buffer zones until the burrow
is deemed inactive by the qualified
biologist. This measure shall be
implemented to the satisfaction of the
City of Fontana Community Development
Director or designee.
owl protection and relocation
program are satisfied prior to
the start of any on-site ground
disturbance activity.
Mitigation Measure BIO-2 If construction
occurs between February 1st and August
31st, a pre-construction clearance survey
for nesting birds, including burrowing
owls, should be conducted within three
(3) days of the start of any vegetation
removal or ground disturbing activities to
ensure that no nesting birds will be
disturbed during construction. The
biologist conducting the clearance survey
should document a negative survey with
a brief letter report indicating that no
impacts to active avian nests will occur. If
an active avian nest is discovered during
the pre-construction clearance survey,
construction activities should stay
outside of a no-disturbance buffer. The
size of the no-disturbance buffer will be
determined by the wildlife biologist and
will depend on the level of noise and/or
surrounding anthropogenic disturbances,
line of sight between the nest and the
construction activity, type and duration
Responsible Party(s)
Applicant / Applicant /
Developer / Qualified
Biologist
Implementation Phase
Prior to initial clearing of
vegetation and grading
and during project
construction
Responsible Party(s)
City of Fontana Community
Development Director, or
designee
Monitoring Period
Prior to initial clearing of
vegetation and grading and
during project construction
Method of Verification
Evidence provided to the City
that:
A qualified biologist is
retained; and
The required pre-construction
survey is completed, and, if
necessary, appropriate buffers
are established and monitored
until the nesting effort is
finished.
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
ENCLAVE AT NORTH FONTANA PROJECT
11/20/25 (P:\2025\20252531 - Enclave at North Fontana\PRODUCT\ISMND\MMRP\MMRP Enclave at North Fontana Project.docx) 4
Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program for the Enclave at North Fontana Project
Mitigation Measure Implementation Monitoring Notes/Initials
of construction activity, ambient noise,
species habituation, and topographical
barriers. These factors will be evaluated
on a case-by-case basis when developing
buffer distances.
Limits of construction to avoid an active
nest will be established in the field with
flagging, fencing, or other appropriate
barriers; and construction personnel will
be instructed on the sensitivity of nest
areas. A biological monitor should be
present to delineate the boundaries of
the buffer area and to monitor the active
nest to ensure that nesting behavior is
not adversely affected by the
construction activity. Once the young
have fledged and left the nest, or the
nest otherwise becomes inactive under
natural conditions, construction activities
within the buffer area can occur.
4.5 Cultural Resources
There are no Mitigation Measures that address impacts related to Cultural Resources.
4.6 Energy
There are no Mitigation Measures that address impacts related to Cultural Resources.
4.7 Geology and Soils
Mitigation Measure GEO-1: Prior to
issuance of grading and/or building
permits, the project applicant shall
provide evidence to the City of Fontana
(City) for review and approval that the
proposed project site, residential
buildings, all ancillary structures and
facilities, and associated infrastructure
have been designed and would be
constructed in conformance with
applicable provisions of the 2022 edition
of the California Building Code (CBC) (or
the most current edition of the CBC in
effect at the time the development
application is deemed complete by the
City).
Additionally, the project applicant shall
provide evidence to the City that the
earthwork recommendations cited in the
project-specific Geotechnical
Investigation are incorporated into
project plans and/or implemented as
deemed appropriate by the City.
Geotechnical recommendations include,
but are not limited to, removal of existing
Responsible Party(s)
Applicant / Developer/
Contractor
Implementation Phase
Prior to the issuance of
grading or building
permits, and during
construction
Responsible Party(s)
City of Fontana Director of
Building and Safety, or designee
Monitoring Period
Prior to the issuance of grading
or building permits, and during
construction
Method of Verification
Evidence provided to the City
that:
Proposed features, structures,
and facilities have been
designed and would be
constructed per the 2022 CBC
or most current edition;
Recommendations cited in the
geotechnical report are
incorporated into project
plans and/or implemented as
deemed appropriate by the
City; and
Retainment of structural
engineer to perform
verification testing upon
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
ENCLAVE AT NORTH FONTANA PROJECT
11/20/25 (P:\2025\20252531 - Enclave at North Fontana\PRODUCT\ISMND\MMRP\MMRP Enclave at North Fontana Project.docx) 5
Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program for the Enclave at North Fontana Project
Mitigation Measure Implementation Monitoring Notes/Initials
vegetation, utilities, and any other
surface and subsurface improvements
that would not remain in place for use
with the new development. Earthwork,
fill materials, and excavation activities
shall occur as specified in the
Geotechnical Investigation. The City’s
Building Official, or designee, shall
confirm recommendations have been
implemented into the design and
construction of the proposed project
prior to the issuance of a building permit.
completion of ground
improvements.
Mitigation Measure GEO-2: During
construction activities, in the event that
paleontological resources are
encountered, work in the immediate area
of the discovery shall be halted, and a
professional paleontologist who meets
the qualifications established by the
Society of Vertebrae Paleontology shall
be retained to assess the discovery. The
qualified professional paleontologist shall
make recommendations regarding the
treatment and disposition of the
discovered resources, as well as the need
for subsequent paleontological
monitoring; collection of observed
resources; preservation, stabilization, and
identification of collected resources;
curation of scientifically significant
resources into a museum repository; and
preparation of a monitoring report of
findings. This measure shall be
implemented to the satisfaction of the
City of Fontana Community Development
Director, or designee.
Responsible Party(s)
Applicant / Developer/
Contractor / Qualified
Paleontologist
Implementation Phase
During construction or
any other ground-
disturbing activities
Responsible Party(s)
City of Fontana Community
Development Director, or
designee
Monitoring Period
During construction or any other
ground-disturbing activities
Method of Verification
Evidence provided to the City
that grading plans include
instructions in the event a
paleontological resource is
detected
4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
There are no Mitigation Measures that address impacts related to Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 Prior to site
clearing and the removal of the suspect
building materials from the project site,
the project applicant shall provide to the
City for review and approval that bulk
sampling of these materials for asbestos
content was conducted in accordance
with the federal Toxic Substances Control
Act, 40 CFR 763.86. If no asbestos is
detected, no further mitigation is
required.
Responsible Party(s)
Applicant / Developer/
Contractor
Implementation Phase
Prior to the
removal/demolition of
the suspect building
materials
Responsible Party(s)
City of Fontana Community
Development Director or
designee, and/or Building and
Safety Division, or designee
Monitoring Period
Prior to the removal/demolition
of the suspect building materials
Method of Verification
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
ENCLAVE AT NORTH FONTANA PROJECT
11/20/25 (P:\2025\20252531 - Enclave at North Fontana\PRODUCT\ISMND\MMRP\MMRP Enclave at North Fontana Project.docx) 6
Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program for the Enclave at North Fontana Project
Mitigation Measure Implementation Monitoring Notes/Initials
Should asbestos containing materials be
detected, prior to the removal of the
building materials from the project site,
the project applicant shall retain a
certified asbestos consultant to properly
dispose of the building materials from the
project site in accordance with 40 CFR
61.150. This measure shall be
implemented to the satisfaction of the
City of Fontana Community Development
Director or designee, and/or Building and
Safety Division, or designee.
Evidence provided to the City:
The results of bulk sampling of
the suspect building materials
for asbestos content;
If necessary, retention of a
Certified Asbestos Consultant
to provide a disposal plan with
disposal tickets from a San
Bernardino County
Department of Public Works-
Solid Waste Management
Division-approved disposal
facility; and
If necessary, an asbestos
disposal report is prepared
and submitted
4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality
There are no Mitigation Measures applicable to the proposed project that address impacts related to Hydrology and
Water Quality.
4.11 Land Use and Planning
There are no Mitigation Measures applicable to the proposed project that address impacts related to Land Use and
Planning.
4.12 Mineral Resources
There are no Mitigation Measures applicable to the proposed project that address impacts related to Mineral Resources.
4.13 Noise
There are no Mitigation Measures applicable to the proposed project that address impacts related to Noise.
4.14 Population and Housing
There are no Mitigation Measures applicable to the proposed project that address impacts related to Population and
Housing.
4.15 Public Services
There are no Mitigation Measures applicable to the proposed project that address impacts related to Public Services.
4.16 Recreation
There are no Mitigation Measures applicable to the proposed project that address impacts related to Recreation.
4.17 Transportation
There are no Mitigation Measures applicable to the proposed project that address impacts related to Transportation.
4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources
There are no Mitigation Measures applicable to the proposed project that address impacts related to Tribal Cultural
Resources.
4.19 Utilities and Service Systems
There are no Mitigation Measures applicable to the proposed project that address impacts related to Utilities and
Service Systems.
4.20 Wildfire
There are no Mitigation Measures applicable to the proposed project that address impacts related to Wildfire.
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
ENCLAVE AT NORTH FONTANA PROJECT
11/20/25 (P:\2025\20252531 - Enclave at North Fontana\PRODUCT\ISMND\MMRP\MMRP Enclave at North Fontana Project.docx) 7
Standard Conditions for the Enclave at North Fontana Project
Standard Condition / Condition of Approval Implementation Monitoring Notes/Initials
4.1 Aesthetics
There are no Standard Conditions required related to aesthetics.
4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources
There are no Standard Conditions required related to Agriculture and Forestry Resources.
4.3 Air Quality
There are no Standard Conditions required related to Air Quality.
4.4 Biological Resources
There are no Standard Conditions required related to Biological Resources.
4.5 Cultural Resources
Standard Condition CUL-1: Upon discovery of any
cultural, tribal cultural, or archaeological resources,
cease construction activities in the immediate vicinity of
the find until the find can be assessed by an
archaeological monitor who would be retained by the
project applicant to monitor all subsequent ground-
disturbing activity in native soils under the supervision of
a project archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the
Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for
archaeology. All cultural, tribal cultural and
archaeological resources unearthed by project
construction activities shall be evaluated by the
archaeological monitor and tribal monitor/consultant. If
the resources are Native American in origin, the property
owner shall coordinate with interested Tribes (as a result
of correspondence with area Tribes) regarding treatment
and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribes will
request preservation in place or recovery for educational
purposes. Work may continue on other parts of the
project site while evaluation takes place.
Responsible Party(s)
Applicant /
Developer /
Contractor/Qualified
Archaeologist
Implementation
Phase
During project
construction
Responsible Party(s)
City of Fontana
Community
Development
Director, or designee
Monitoring Period
During project
construction
Method of
Verification
Evidence provided to
the City that:
Project Applicant
/ developer
retains an
archaeological
monitor who
would be
supervised under
a project
archaeologist
who meets the
Secretary of the
Interior’s
Professional
Qualifications
Standards for
archaeology;
Appropriate
buffers are
established as
necessary;
Recommendation
for the treatment
and disposition of
resources by the
qualified
archaeologist in
consultation with
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
ENCLAVE AT NORTH FONTANA PROJECT
11/20/25 (P:\2025\20252531 - Enclave at North Fontana\PRODUCT\ISMND\MMRP\MMRP Enclave at North Fontana Project.docx) 8
Standard Conditions for the Enclave at North Fontana Project
Standard Condition / Condition of Approval Implementation Monitoring Notes/Initials
the Tribe[s],
Native American
monitor[s], and
the
archaeological
monitor
Standard Condition CUL-2: Preservation in place shall be
the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in
place is not feasible, treatment may include
implementation of archaeological data recovery
excavation to remove the resource from the area of
ground disturbance along with subsequent laboratory
processing and analysis. All removed Tribal Cultural
Resources shall be returned to the Tribes. Any historic
archaeological material that is not Native American in
origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution
with a research interest in the materials, if such an
institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution
accepts the archaeological material, they shall be offered
to the Tribe or a local school or historical society in the
area for educational purposes.
Responsible Party(s)
Applicant /
Developer /
Contractor
Implementation
Phase
During project
construction
Responsible Party(s)
City of Fontana
Community
Development
Director, or designee
Monitoring Period
During project
construction
Method of
Verification
Evidence provided to
the City that:
Recommendation
for the treatment
and disposition of
Tribal Cultural
resources by the
Project
Applicant/develo
per-retained
archaeological
monitor in
consultation with
the Tribe[s]; and
Proof of receipt of
non-Native
American historic
archaeological
material by a
public, non-profit
institution with a
research interest
in the said
materials, or to
the Tribe[s], local
school, or
historical society
in the area for
education
purposes if no
institution
accepts the said
materials.
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
ENCLAVE AT NORTH FONTANA PROJECT
11/20/25 (P:\2025\20252531 - Enclave at North Fontana\PRODUCT\ISMND\MMRP\MMRP Enclave at North Fontana Project.docx) 9
Standard Conditions for the Enclave at North Fontana Project
Standard Condition / Condition of Approval Implementation Monitoring Notes/Initials
Standard Condition CUL-3: Archaeological and Native
American monitoring and excavation during construction
projects shall be consistent with current professional
standards. All feasible care to avoid any unnecessary
disturbance, physical modification, or separation of
human remains and associated funerary objects shall be
taken. Principal personnel shall meet the Secretary of the
Interior standards for archaeology and have a minimum
of 10 years’ experience as a principal investigator
working with Native American archaeological sites in
southern California. The principal personnel shall ensure
that the archaeological monitor and all other personnel
are appropriately trained and qualified.
Responsible Party(s)
Applicant /
Developer /
Contractor
Implementation
Phase
During project
construction
Responsible Party(s)
City of Fontana
Community
Development
Director, or designee
Monitoring Period
During project
construction
Method of
Verification
Evidence provided to
the City that:
Project
Applicant/develo
per-retained
principal
personnel that
meets the
Secretary of the
Interior’s
standards for
archaeology and
have a minimum
of 10 years’
experience as a
principal
investigator; and
The
archaeological
monitor and all
other personnel
are appropriately
trained and
qualified.
Standard Condition CUL-4: In the event human remains
are encountered, State Health and Safety Code Section
7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur
until the County Coroner has made a determination of
origin and disposition pursuant to PRC Section 5097.98.
The County Coroner must be notified of the find
immediately. If the remains are determined to be Native
American, the County Coroner would notify the Native
American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which would
determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD).
With the permission of the landowner or his/her
authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site
of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection
and make recommendations or preferences for
treatment within 48 hours of being granted access to the
Responsible Party(s)
Applicant /
Developer /
Contractor/County
Coroner
Implementation
Phase
Project duration
Responsible Party(s)
City of Fontana
Community
Development
Director, or designee
Monitoring Period
Project duration
Method of
Verification
Evidence provided to
the City that:
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
ENCLAVE AT NORTH FONTANA PROJECT
11/20/25 (P:\2025\20252531 - Enclave at North Fontana\PRODUCT\ISMND\MMRP\MMRP Enclave at North Fontana Project.docx) 10
Standard Conditions for the Enclave at North Fontana Project
Standard Condition / Condition of Approval Implementation Monitoring Notes/Initials
site. The MLD recommendations may include scientific
removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains
and items associated with Native American burials,
preservation of Native American human remains and
associated items in place, relinquishment of Native
American human remains and associated items to the
descendants for treatment, or any other culturally
appropriate treatment.
Appropriate
buffer areas have
been established
as applicable; and
Coordinate with
Native American
Tribe[s], City of
Fontana
Community
Development
Director (or
designee), and
County Coroner
as necessary.
4.6 Energy
There are no Standard Conditions required related to Energy.
4.7 Geology and Soils
There are no Standard Conditions required related to Geology and Soils.
4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
There are no Standard Conditions required related to Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
There are no Standard Conditions required related to Hazards and Hazardous Materials.
4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality
Standard Condition HYD-1: Per the State Water
Resources Control Board (SWRCB) National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for
Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction and
Land Disturbance Activities (Order No. 2022-0057-DWQ,
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System No.
CAS000002) (Construction General Permit), the project
applicant shall obtain coverage under the Construction
General Permit prior to issuance of a grading permit. This
shall include submission of Permit Registration
Documents (PRDs), including a Notice of Intent for
coverage under the permit to the State Water Resources
Control Board (SWRCB) via the Stormwater Multiple
Application and Report Tracking System (SMARTs). The
project applicant shall provide the Waste Discharge
Identification Number (WDID) to the City of Fontana
(City), or designee, to demonstrate proof of coverage
under the Construction General Permit. Project
construction shall not be initiated until a WDID is
received from the SWRCB and is provided to the City, or
designee. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP) shall be prepared and implemented for the
proposed project in compliance with the requirements of
the Construction General Permit. The SWPPP shall
identify construction best management practices (BMPs)
to be implemented to ensure that the potential for soil
erosion and sedimentation is minimized and to control
Responsible Party(s)
Applicant /
Developer /
Contractor
Implementation
Phase
Prior to issuance of a
grading permit,
during construction,
and upon
completion of
construction
Responsible Party(s)
Director of the City
of Fontana Public
Works Department,
or designee
Monitoring Period
Prior to issuance of a
grading permit,
during construction,
and upon
completion of
construction
Method of
Verification
Evidence provided to
the City that:
A Waste
Discharge
Identification
Number (WDID) is
obtained for the
Project from the
SMARTS;
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
ENCLAVE AT NORTH FONTANA PROJECT
11/20/25 (P:\2025\20252531 - Enclave at North Fontana\PRODUCT\ISMND\MMRP\MMRP Enclave at North Fontana Project.docx) 11
Standard Conditions for the Enclave at North Fontana Project
Standard Condition / Condition of Approval Implementation Monitoring Notes/Initials
the discharge of pollutants in stormwater runoff as a
result of construction activities. Upon completion of
construction and stabilization of the site, a Notice of
Termination shall be submitted via SMARTs.
Project coverage
under the
Construction
General Permit;
Submittal of a
Stormwater
Pollution
Prevention Plan
to the City that
includes BMPs;
and
Submittal of a
Notice of
Termination via
SMARTs.
Standard Condition HYD-2: Prior to the commencement
of any land disturbing activities, the project applicant
shall provide the SWPPP to the City for review and
approval pursuant to Section 23-519 of the City
Municipal Code.
Responsible Party(s)
Applicant /
Developer /
Contractor
Implementation
Phase
Prior to ground
disturbing activities
Responsible Party(s)
Director of the City
of Fontana Public
Works Department,
or designee
Monitoring Period
Prior to ground
disturbing activities
Method of
Verification
Evidence provided to
the City that:
Project coverage
under the
Construction
General Permit;
and
Submittal of a
Stormwater
Pollution
Prevention Plan
to the City that
includes BMPs.
Standard Condition HYD-3: Prior to issuance of a grading
permit, the project applicant shall submit a Final Water
Quality Management Plan (Final WQMP) to the City of
Fontana (City) for review and approval in compliance
with the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water
Quality Control Board’s NPDES Permit Waste Discharge
Requirements for the San Bernardino County Flood
Control District, the County of San Bernardino, and the
Incorporated Cities of San Bernardino County Within the
Santa Ana Region Area-Wide Urban Stormwater Runoff
Responsible Party(s)
Applicant /
Developer /
Contractor
Implementation
Phase
Prior to the issuance
of grading permit
Responsible Party(s)
Director of the City
of Fontana Public
Works Department,
or designee
Monitoring Period
Prior to the issuance
of grading permit
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
ENCLAVE AT NORTH FONTANA PROJECT
11/20/25 (P:\2025\20252531 - Enclave at North Fontana\PRODUCT\ISMND\MMRP\MMRP Enclave at North Fontana Project.docx) 12
Standard Conditions for the Enclave at North Fontana Project
Standard Condition / Condition of Approval Implementation Monitoring Notes/Initials
Management Program (Order No. R8-2010-0036, NPDES
No. CAS618036) (San Bernardino County MS4 Permit) or
subsequent permit. The Final WQMP shall specify the
Best Management Practices (BMPs) to be incorporated
into the project design to target pollutants of concern in
stormwater runoff from the project site and the
necessary operation and maintenance activity for each
BMP. The City shall ensure that the BMPs specified in the
Final WQMP are incorporated into the final project
design. The proposed BMPs specified in the Final WQMP
shall be incorporated into the grading and development
plans submitted to the City for review and approval.
Project occupancy and operation shall be in accordance
with the schedule outlined in the WQMP.
and occupancy
permit
and occupancy
permit
Method of
Verification
Submittal to City of a
Final Water Quality
Management Plan
(Final WQMP) and
evidence to the City
that BMPs specified
in the Final WQMP
are incorporated
into the final project
design.
Standard Condition HYD-4: Prior to issuance of a grading
permit, the project applicant shall submit a grading plan
and landscaping plan that incorporates the stormwater
management, rainwater retention, and Low Impact
Development requirements outlined in the City of
Fontana’s Municipal Code to the City for review and
approval.
Responsible Party(s)
Applicant /
Developer /
Contractor
Implementation
Phase
Prior to issuance of a
grading permit
Responsible Party(s)
Director of the City
of Fontana Public
Works Department,
or designee
Monitoring Period
Prior to issuance of a
grading permit
Method of
Verification
Submittal to City of a
final grading plan
and landscaping plan
that incorporates
City requirements
for stormwater
management,
rainwater retention,
and Low Impact
Development per
the City’s Municipal
Code.
4.11 Land Use and Planning
Condition of Approval TRA-1: In order to maintain
acceptable LOS during Opening Year (2026) AM and PM
peak hours at local roadway intersections, the project
shall pay its fair share contribution to the City of Fontana
for the implementation of the following improvements at
Citrus Avenue and Sierra Lakes Parkway:
Add overlap phasing to the northbound right-turn at
Citrus Avenue and Sierra Lakes Parkway.
Responsible Party(s)
Applicant /
Developer
Implementation
Phase
Prior to approval of
project and issuance
of a grading permit
Responsible Party(s)
City of Fontana
Community
Development
Director or designee,
and/or Planning
Department, or
designee
Monitoring Period
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
ENCLAVE AT NORTH FONTANA PROJECT
11/20/25 (P:\2025\20252531 - Enclave at North Fontana\PRODUCT\ISMND\MMRP\MMRP Enclave at North Fontana Project.docx) 13
Standard Conditions for the Enclave at North Fontana Project
Standard Condition / Condition of Approval Implementation Monitoring Notes/Initials
Prior to approval of
project and issuance
of a grading permit
Method of
Verification
Evidence provided to
the City that:
Fair share
contribution has
been paid
4.12 Mineral Resources
There are no Standard Conditions required related to Mineral Resources.
4.13 Noise
Standard Condition NOI-1: The construction contractor
shall limit construction activities to between the hours of
7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on weekdays and between the
hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays pursuant
to Section 18-63(b)(7) of the City’s Municipal Code (City
of Fontana 2025). Construction is prohibited outside
these hours and on Sundays.
Responsible Party(s)
Applicant /
Developer /
Contractor
Implementation
Phase
Prior to the issuance
of grading and
building permits and
during construction
activities
Responsible Party(s)
City of Fontana
Building Inspector
Monitoring Period
Prior to the issuance
of grading and
building permits and
during construction
activities
Method of
Verification
Submittal to City of
project construction
plans that include
direction to adhere
to the City’s noise
source controls at all
times, including
work hours, model
types, upkeep of
construction
equipment, and path
controls where
necessary and
physically feasible.
4.14 Population and Housing
There are no Standard Conditions required related to Population and Housing.
4.15 Public Services
There are no Standard Conditions required related to Public Services.
4.16 Recreation
There are no Standard Conditions required related to Recreation.
4.17 Transportation
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
ENCLAVE AT NORTH FONTANA PROJECT
11/20/25 (P:\2025\20252531 - Enclave at North Fontana\PRODUCT\ISMND\MMRP\MMRP Enclave at North Fontana Project.docx) 14
Standard Conditions for the Enclave at North Fontana Project
Standard Condition / Condition of Approval Implementation Monitoring Notes/Initials
There are no Standard Conditions required related to Transportation.
4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources
There are no Standard Conditions required related to Tribal Cultural Resources.
4.19 Utilities and Service Systems
There are no Standard Conditions required related to Utilities and Service Systems.
4.20 Wildfire
There are no Standard Conditions required related to Wildfire.