HomeMy WebLinkAboutF - EA Report
Almond & Valley Distribution
Center
ENERGY ANALYSIS
CITY OF FONTANA
PREPARED BY:
Haseeb Qureshi
hqureshi@urbanxroads.com
Ali Dadabhoy
adadabhoy@urbanxroads.com
Shannon Wong
swong@urbanxroads.com
MARCH 31, 2023
15256-03 EA Report
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................. I
APPENDICES ......................................................................................................................................... II
LIST OF EXHIBITS .................................................................................................................................. II
LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................... II
LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS ............................................................................................................. III
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 1
ES.1 Summary of Findings ..................................................................................................................... 1
ES.2 Project Requirements ................................................................................................................... 1
1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 3
1.1 Site Location .................................................................................................................................. 3
1.2 Project Description ........................................................................................................................ 3
2 EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................ 7
2.1 Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 7
2.2 Electricity ..................................................................................................................................... 10
2.3 Natural Gas ................................................................................................................................. 12
2.4 Transportation Energy Resources ............................................................................................... 15
3 REGULATORY BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................... 18
3.1 Federal Regulations ..................................................................................................................... 18
3.2 California Regulations ................................................................................................................. 18
4 PROJECT ENERGY DEMANDS AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY MEASURES ........................................... 24
4.1 Evaluation Criteria ....................................................................................................................... 24
4.2 Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 24
4.3 Construction Energy Demands ................................................................................................... 25
4.4 Operational Energy Demands ..................................................................................................... 33
4.5 Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 36
5 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................................... 40
6 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................. 44
7 CERTIFICATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 47
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
ii
APPENDICES
APPENDIX 4.1: CALEEMOD PROPOSED PROJECT EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS
APPENDIX 4.2: CALEEMOD EXISTING PROJECT EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS
APPENDIX 4.3: EMFAC 2021
LIST OF EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT 1-A: LOCATION MAP .............................................................................................................. 4
EXHIBIT 1-B: SITE PLAN........................................................................................................................ 5
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE ES-1: SUMMARY OF CEQA SIGNIFICANCE FINDINGS .................................................................. 1
TABLE 2-1: TOTAL ELECTRICITY SYSTEM POWER (CALIFORNIA 2021) .................................................... 9
TABLE 2-2: SCE 2021 POWER CONTENT MIX ....................................................................................... 12
TABLE 4-1: CONSTRUCTION DURATION .............................................................................................. 25
TABLE 4-2: CONSTRUCTION POWER COST .......................................................................................... 26
TABLE 4-3: CONSTRUCTION ELECTRICITY USAGE ................................................................................ 26
TABLE 4-4: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ASSUMPTIONS .................................................................... 27
TABLE 4-5: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES ........................................ 29
TABLE 4-6: CONSTRUCTION TRIPS AND VMT ...................................................................................... 30
TABLE 4-7: CONSTRUCTION WORKER FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES ............................................. 31
TABLE 4-8: CONSTRUCTION VENDOR FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES .............................................. 32
TABLE 4-9: EXISTING-GENERATED TRAFFIC ANNUAL FUEL CONSUMPTION ......................................... 34
TABLE 4-10: TOTAL PROJECT-GENERATED TRAFFIC ANNUAL FUEL CONSUMPTION ............................. 35
TABLE 4-11: PROJECT ANNUAL OPERATIONAL ENERGY DEMAND SUMMARY ..................................... 35
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
iii
LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS
% Percent
(1) Reference
AGSP Airport Gateway Specific Plan
AQIA Almond & Valley Distribution Center Air Quality Impact
Analysis
BACM Best Available Control Measures
BTU British Thermal Units
CalEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model
CAPCOA California Air Pollution Control Officers Association
CARB California Air Resources Board
CCR California Code of Regulations
CEC California Energy Commission
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
City City of Fontana
CPEP Clean Power and Electrification Pathway
CPUC California Public Utilities Commission
DMV Department of Motor Vehicles
EIA Energy Information Administration
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
EMFAC EMissions FACtor
FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
GHG Greenhouse Gas
GWh Gigawatt Hour
HHDT Heavy-Heavy Duty Trucks
hp-hr-gal Horsepower Hours Per Gallon
IEPR Integrated Energy Policy Report
ISO Independent Service Operator
ISTEA Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act
ITE Institute of Transportation Engineers
kBTU Thousand-British Thermal Units
kWh Kilowatt Hour
LDA Light Duty Auto
LDT1/LDT2 Light-Duty Trucks
LHDT1/LHDT2 Light-Heavy Duty Trucks
MARB/IPA March Air Reserve Base/Inland Port Airport
MDV Medium Duty Trucks
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
iv
MHDT Medium-Heavy Duty Trucks
MMcfd Million Cubic Feet Per Day
mpg Miles Per Gallon
MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization
PG&E Pacific Gas and Electric
Project Almond & Valley Distribution Center
PV Photovoltaic
SCAB South Coast Air Basin
SCE Southern California Edison
SDAB San Diego Air Basin
sf Square Feet
SoCalGas Southern California Gas
TEA-21 Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
TRUs Transportation Refrigeration Units
U.S. United States
VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
v
This page intentionally left blank
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ES.1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
The results of this Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis is summarized below
based on the significance criteria in Section 5 of this report consistent with Appendix G of the
2020 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Statute and Guidelines (CEQA Guidelines) (1).
Table ES-1 shows the findings of significance for potential energy impacts under CEQA.
TABLE ES-1: SUMMARY OF CEQA SIGNIFICANCE FINDINGS
Analysis Report
Section
Significance Findings
Unmitigated Mitigated
Energy Impact #1: Would the Project result in
potentially significant environmental impact due
to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary
consumption of energy resources, during project
construction or operation?
5.0 Less Than Significant n/a
Energy Impact #2: Would the Project conflict
with or obstruct a state or local plan for
renewable energy or energy efficiency?
5.0 Less Than Significant n/a
ES.2 PROJECT REQUIREMENTS
The Project would be required to comply with regulations imposed by the federal and State
agencies that regulate energy use and consumption through various means and programs. Those
that are directly and indirectly applicable to the Project and that would assist in the reduction of
energy usage include:
• Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA)
• The Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21
• Integrated Energy Policy Report (IEPR)
• State of California Energy Plan
• California Code Title 24, Part 6, Energy Efficiency Standards
• California Code Title 24, Part 11, California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen)
• AB 1493 Pavley Regulations and Fuel Efficiency Standards
• California’s Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS)
• Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act of 2015 (SB 350)
Consistency with the above regulations is discussed in detail in section 5 of this report.
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
2
This page intentionally left blank
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report 3
1 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of the energy analysis prepared by Urban Crossroads, Inc., for
the proposed Almond & Valley Distribution Center Project (Project). The purpose of this report is
to ensure that energy implication is considered by the City of Fontana (Lead Agency), as the lead
agency, and to quantify anticipated energy usage associated with construction and operation of
the proposed Project, determine if the usage amounts are efficient, typical, or wasteful for the
land use type, and to emphasize avoiding or reducing inefficient, wasteful, and unnecessary
consumption of energy.
1.1 SITE LOCATION
The proposed project is located at 9813 Almond Avenue in the City of Fontana. The Project
location is shown on Exhibit 1-A. The Project Site is located within an existing industrial area
south of the Auto Club Speedway less than one mile north of the I-10 Freeway. The site is
occupied by an existing tenant and is currently active. The site is occupied by a trucking company
that provides support distribution needs for their shipping partners.
1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed Project will redevelop the existing 11.28-acre property with a single 275,560
square foot (sf) warehouse building (269,560 sf of warehousing space and 6,000 sf of office space,
with mezzanine space included) as shown on Exhibit 1-B.
It is expected that the Project business operations would primarily be conducted within the
enclosed buildings, except for traffic movement, parking, as well as loading and unloading of
trucks at designated loading bays. This analysis includes a conservative assumption of on-site
Project-related emission sources for potential future tenants, including architectural coatings,
consumer products, landscape maintenance equipment, electricity, mobile operations, and on-
site cargo handling equipment. This analysis is intended to describe air quality impacts associated
with the expected typical operational activities at the Project site. To present a conservative
approach, this report assumes the Project would operate 24-hours daily for seven days per week.
Per the Almond & Valley Distribution Center Trip Generation Assessment prepared by Urban
Crossroads, Inc., the Project is expected to generate a total of approximately 592 vehicular trips
per day, which includes 130 truck trips per day (2).
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
4
EXHIBIT 1-A: LOCATION MAP
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
5
EXHIBIT 1-B: SITE PLAN
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
6
This page intentionally left blank
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
7
2 EXISTING CONDITIONS
This section provides an overview of the existing energy conditions in the Project region.
2.1 OVERVIEW
The most recent data for California’s estimated total energy consumption and natural gas
consumption is from 2020, released by the United States (U.S.) Energy Information
Administration’s (EIA) California State Profile and Energy Estimates in 2021 and included (3):
• As of 2020, approximately 6,923 trillion British Thermal Unit (BTU) of energy was consumed
• As of 2020, approximately 524 million barrels of petroleum
• As of 2020, approximately 2,075 billion cubic feet of natural gas
• As of 2020, approximately 1 million short tons of coal
According to the EIA, in 2021 the U.S. petroleum consumption comprised about 77% of all
transportation energy use, excluding fuel consumed for aviation and most marine vessels (4). In
2021, about 249,790 million gallons (or about 5.95 million barrels) of finished petroleum products
were consumed in the U.S., an average of about 684 million gallons per day (or about 16 million
barrels per day) (5). In 2021, California consumed approximately 12,157 million gallons in motor
gasoline (33.31 million per day) and approximately 3,541 million gallons of diesel fuel (9.7 million
per day) (6).
The most recent data provided by the EIA for energy use in California by demand sector is from
2020 and is reported as follows:
• Approximately 34.0% transportation
• Approximately 24.6% industrial
• Approximately 21.8% residential
• Approximately 19.6% commercial (7)
According to the EIA, California used approximately 247,250 gigawatt hours of electricity in 2021
(8). By sector in 2021, residential uses utilized 36.5% of the state’s electricity, followed by 43.9%
for commercial uses, 19.2% for industrial uses, and 0.3% for transportation. Electricity usage in
California for differing land uses varies substantially by the type of uses in a building, type of
construction materials used in a building, and the efficiency of all electricity-consuming devices
within a building (8).
According to the EIA, California used approximately 200,871 million therms of natural gas in 2021
(9). In 2021 (the most recent year for which data is available), by sector, industrial uses utilized
33% of the state’s natural gas, followed by 30% used as fuel in the electric power sector, 21%
from residential, 11% from commercial, 1% from transportation uses and the remaining 3% was
utilized for the operations, processing and production of natural gas itself (9). While the supply
of natural gas in the United States and production in the lower 48 states has increased greatly
since 2008, California produces little, and imports 90% of its supply of natural gas (9).
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
8
In 2021, total system electric generation for California was 277,764 gigawatt hours (GWh).
California's massive electricity in-state generation system generated approximately 194,127
GWh which accounted for approximately 70% of the electricity it uses; the rest was imported
from the Pacific Northwest (12%) and the U.S. Southwest (18%) (10). Natural gas is the main
source for electricity generation at 50.2% of the total in-state electric generation system power
as shown in Table 2-1.
An updated summary of, and context for energy consumption and energy demands within the
State is presented in “U.S. Energy Information Administration, California State Profile and Energy
Estimates, Quick Facts” excerpted below (8):
• In 2021, California was the seventh-largest producer of crude oil among the 50 states, and,
as of January 2021, it ranked third in crude oil refining capacity.
• California is the largest consumer of jet fuel and second-largest consumer of motor gasoline
among the 50 states and, the state accounted for 15% of the nation’s jet fuel consumption
and 10% of motor gasoline consumption in 2020.
• In 2019, California was the second-largest total energy consumer among the states, but its
per capita energy consumption was less than in all other states except Rhode Island, due in
part to its mild climate and its energy efficiency programs.
• In 2021, California was the nation’s top producer of electricity from solar, geothermal, and
biomass energy. The state was fourth in the nation in conventional hydroelectric power
generation, down from second in 2019, in part because of drought and increased water
demand.
• In 2021, California was the fourth-largest electricity producer in the nation, but the state
was also the nation’s second-largest consumer of electricity, and in 2020, it received about
30% of its electricity supply from generating facilities outside of California, including imports
from Mexico.
As indicated below, California is one of the nation’s leading energy-producing states, and
California’s per capita energy use is among the nation’s most efficient. Given the nature of the
Project, the remainder of this discussion will focus on the three sources of energy that are most
relevant to the Project—namely, electricity, natural gas, and transportation fuel for vehicle trips
associated with the uses planned for the Project.
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
9
TABLE 2-1: TOTAL ELECTRICITY SYSTEM POWER (CALIFORNIA 2021)
Fuel Type California In-State
Generation (GWh)
% of California In-
State Generation
Northwest
Imports
(GWh)
Southwest
Imports
(GWh)
Total
Imports
(GWh)
% of
Imports
Total
California
Energy
Mix ()
Total
California
Power Mix
Coal 303 0.2% 181 7,788 7,969 9.5% 8,272 3.0%
Natural Gas 97,431 50.2% 45 7,880 7,925 9.5% 105,356 379.0%
Oil 37 0.0% - - - 0.0% 37 0.0%
Other
(Waste Heat/Petroleum Coke) 382 0.2% 68 15 83 0.1% 465 0.2%
Nuclear 16,477 8.5% 524 8,756 9,281 11.1% 25,758 9.3%
Large Hydro 12,036 6.2% 12,042 1,578 13,620 16.3% 25,656 9.2%
Unspecified - 0.0% 8,156 10,731 18,887 22.6% 18,887 6.8%
Total Thermal and
Non-Renewables 126,666 65.2% 21,017 36,748 57,764 6910.0% 184,431 66.4%
Biomass 5,381 2.8% 864 26 890 1.1% 6,271 2.3%
Geothermal 11,116 5.7% 192 1,906 2,098 2.5% 13,214 4.8%
Small Hydro 2,531 1.3% 304 1 304 0.4% 2,835 1.0%
Solar 33,260 17.1% 220 5,979 6,199 7.4% 39,458 14.2%
Wind 15,173 7.8% 9,976 6,405 16,381 19.6% 31,555 11.4%
Total Renewables 67,461 34.8% 11,555 14,317 25,872 3090.0% 93,333 33.6%
SYSTEM TOTALS 194,127 100.0% 32,572 51,064 83,636 100.0% 277,764 100.0%
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
10
An updated summary of, and context for energy consumption and energy demands within the
State is presented in “U.S. Energy Information Administration, California State Profile and Energy
Estimates, Quick Facts” excerpted below (11):
• In 2021, California was the seventh-largest producer of crude oil among the 50 states, and,
as of January 2021, it ranked third in crude oil refining capacity.
• California is the largest consumer of jet fuel and second-largest consumer of motor gasoline
among the 50 states and, the state accounted for 15% of the nation’s jet fuel consumption
and 10% of motor gasoline consumption in 2020.
• In 2019, California was the second-largest total energy consumer among the states, but its
per capita energy consumption was less than in all other states except Rhode Island, due in
part to its mild climate and its energy efficiency programs.
• In 2021, California was the nation’s top producer of electricity from solar, geothermal, and
biomass energy. The state was fourth in the nation in conventional hydroelectric power
generation, down from second in 2019, in part because of drought and increased water
demand.
• In 2021, California was the fourth-largest electricity producer in the nation, but the state
was also the nation’s second-largest consumer of electricity, and in 2020, it received about
30% of its electricity supply from generating facilities outside of California, including imports
from Mexico.
As indicated above, California is one of the nation’s leading energy-producing states, and
California’s per capita energy use is among the nation’s most efficient. Given the nature of the
Project, the remainder of this discussion will focus on the three sources of energy that are most
relevant to the Project—namely, electricity, natural gas, and transportation fuel for vehicle trips
associated with the uses planned for the Project.
2.2 ELECTRICITY
The usage associated with electricity use were calculated using CalEEMod Version 2022.1. The
Southern California region’s electricity reliability has been of concern for the past several years
due to the planned retirement of aging facilities that depend upon once-through cooling
technologies, as well as the June 2013 retirement of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station
(San Onofre). While the once-through cooling phase-out has been ongoing since the May 2010
adoption of the State Water Resources Control Board’s once-through cooling policy, the
retirement of San Onofre complicated the situation. California Independent Service Operator
(ISO) studies revealed the extent to which the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) and the San Diego Air
Basin (SDAB) region were vulnerable to low-voltage and post-transient voltage instability
concerns. A preliminary plan to address these issues was detailed in the 2013 Integrative Energy
Policy Report (IEPR) after a collaborative process with other energy agencies, utilities, and air
districts (12). Similarly, the subsequent 2022 IEPR’s provides information and policy
recommendations on advancing a clean, reliable, and affordable energy system.
California’s electricity industry is an organization of traditional utilities, private generating
companies, and state agencies, each with a variety of roles and responsibilities to ensure that
electrical power is provided to consumers. The California ISO is a nonprofit public benefit
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
11
corporation and is the impartial operator of the State’s wholesale power grid and is charged with
maintaining grid reliability, and to direct uninterrupted electrical energy supplies to California’s
homes and communities. While utilities still own transmission assets, the ISO routes electrical
power along these assets, maximizing the use of the transmission system and its power
generation resources. The ISO matches buyers and sellers of electricity to ensure that enough
power is available to meet demand. To these ends, every five minutes the ISO forecasts electrical
demands, accounts for operating reserves, and assigns the lowest cost power plant unit to meet
demands while ensuring adequate system transmission capacities and capabilities (13).
Part of the ISO’s charge is to plan and coordinate grid enhancements to ensure that electrical
power is provided to California consumers. To this end, utilities file annual transmission
expansion/modification plans to accommodate the State’s growing electrical needs. The ISO
reviews and either approves or denies the proposed additions. In addition, and perhaps most
importantly, the ISO works with other areas in the western United States electrical grid to ensure
that adequate power supplies are available to the State. In this manner, continuing reliable and
affordable electrical power is assured to existing and new consumers throughout the State.
Electricity is currently provided to the Project site by Southern California Edison (SCE). SCE
provides electric power to more than 15 million persons in 15 counties and in 180 incorporated
cities, within a service area encompassing approximately 50,000 square miles. Based on SCE’s
2021 Power Content Label Mix, SCE derives electricity from varied energy resources including:
fossil fuels, hydroelectric generators, nuclear power plants, geothermal power plants, solar
power generation, and wind farms. SCE also purchases from independent power producers and
utilities, including out-of-state suppliers (14).
Table 2-2, SCE’s specific proportional shares of electricity sources in 2021. As indicated in Table
2-2, the 2021 SCE Power Mix has renewable energy at 31.4% of the overall energy resources.
Geothermal resources are at 5.7%, wind power is at 10.2%, large hydroelectric sources are at
2.3%, solar energy is at 14.9%, and coal is at 0% (15).
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
12
TABLE 2-2: SCE 2021 POWER CONTENT MIX
Energy Resources 2021 SCE Power Mix
Eligible Renewable 31.4%
Biomass & Waste 0.1%
Geothermal 5.7%
Eligible Hydroelectric 0.5%
Solar 14.9%
Wind 10.2%
Coal 0.0%
Large Hydroelectric 2.3%
Natural Gas 22.3%
Nuclear 9.2%
Other 0.2%
Unspecified Sources of power* 34.6%
Total 100%
* "Unspecified sources of power" means electricity from transactions that are not
traceable to specific generation sources
2.3 NATURAL GAS
The following summary of natural gas customers and volumes, supplies, delivery of supplies,
storage, service options, and operations is excerpted from information provided by the California
Public Utilities Commission (CPUC).
“The CPUC regulates natural gas utility service for approximately 10.8 million customers
that receive natural gas from Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E), Southern California Gas
(SoCalGas), San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E), Southwest Gas, and several smaller natural
gas utilities. The CPUC also regulates independent storage operators: Lodi Gas Storage,
Wild Goose Storage, Central Valley Storage and Gill Ranch Storage.
California's natural gas utilities provide service to over 11 million gas meters. SoCalGas
and PG&E provide service to about 5.9 million and 4.3 million customers, respectively,
while SDG&E provides service to over 800, 000 customers. In 2018, California gas utilities
forecasted that they would deliver about 4740 million cubic feet per day (MMcfd) of gas
to their customers, on average, under normal weather conditions.
The overwhelming majority of natural gas utility customers in California are residential
and small commercials customers, referred to as "core" customers. Larger volume gas
customers, like electric generators and industrial customers, are called "noncore"
customers. Although very small in number relative to core customers, noncore customers
consume about 65% of the natural gas delivered by the state's natural gas utilities, while
core customers consume about 35%.
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
13
A significant amount of gas (about 19%, or 1131 MMcfd, of the total forecasted California
consumption in 2018) is also directly delivered to some California large volume consumers,
without being transported over the regulated utility pipeline system. Those customers,
referred to as "bypass" customers, take service directly from interstate pipelines or directly
from California producers.
SDG&E and Southwest Gas' southern division are wholesale customers of SoCalGas, i.e.,
they receive deliveries of gas from SoCalGas and in turn deliver that gas to their own
customers. (Southwest Gas also provides natural gas distribution service in the Lake
Tahoe area.) Similarly, West Coast Gas, a small gas utility, is a wholesale customer of
PG&E. Some other wholesale customers are municipalities like the cities of Palo Alto, Long
Beach, and Vernon, which are not regulated by the CPUC.
Natural gas from out-of-state production basins is delivered into California via the
interstate natural gas pipeline system. The major interstate pipelines that deliver out-of-
state natural gas to California gas utilities are Gas Transmission Northwest Pipeline, Kern
River Pipeline, Transwestern Pipeline, El Paso Pipeline, Ruby Pipeline, Mojave Pipeline, and
Tuscarora. Another pipeline, the North Baja - Baja Norte Pipeline takes gas off the El
Paso Pipeline at the California/Arizona border and delivers that gas through California into
Mexico. While the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) regulates the
transportation of natural gas on the interstate pipelines, and authorizes rates for that
service, the California Public Utilities Commission may participate in FERC regulatory
proceedings to represent the interests of California natural gas consumers.
The gas transported to California gas utilities via the interstate pipelines, as well as some
of the California-produced gas, is delivered into the PG&E and SoCalGas intrastate natural
gas transmission pipelines systems (commonly referred to as California's "backbone"
pipeline system). Natural gas on the utilities' backbone pipeline systems is then delivered
to the local transmission and distribution pipeline systems, or to natural gas storage
fields. Some large volume noncore customers take natural gas delivery directly off the
high-pressure backbone and local transmission pipeline systems, while core customers
and other noncore customers take delivery off the utilities' distribution pipeline
systems. The state's natural gas utilities operate over 100,000 miles of transmission and
distribution pipelines, and thousands more miles of service lines.
Bypass customers take most of their deliveries directly off the Kern/Mojave pipeline
system, but they also take a significant amount of gas from California production.
PG&E and SoCalGas own and operate several natural gas storage fields that are located
within their service territories in northern and southern California, respectively. These
storage fields, and four independently owned storage utilities - Lodi Gas Storage, Wild
Goose Storage, Central Valley Storage, and Gill Ranch Storage - help meet peak seasonal
and daily natural gas demand and allow California natural gas customers to secure
natural gas supplies more efficiently. PG&E is a 25% owner of the Gill Ranch Storage field.
These storage fields provide a significant amount of infrastructure capacity to help meet
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
14
California's natural gas requirements, and without these storage fields, California would
need much more pipeline capacity in order to meet peak gas requirements.
Prior to the late 1980s, California regulated utilities provided virtually all natural gas
services to all their customers. Since then, the Commission has gradually restructured the
California gas industry in order to give customers more options while assuring regulatory
protections for those customers that wish to, or are required to, continue receiving utility-
provided services.
The option to purchase natural gas from independent suppliers is one of the results of this
restructuring process. Although the regulated utilities procure natural gas supplies for
most core customers, core customers have the option to purchase natural gas from
independent natural gas marketers, called "core transport agents" (CTA). Contact
information for core transport agents can be found on the utilities' web sites. Noncore
customers, on the other hand, make natural gas supply arrangements directly with
producers or with marketers.
Another option resulting from the restructuring process occurred in 1993, when the
Commission removed the utilities' storage service responsibility for noncore customers,
along with the cost of this service from noncore customers' transportation rates. The
Commission also encouraged the development of independent storage fields, and in
subsequent years, all the independent storage fields in California were
established. Noncore customers and marketers may now take storage service from the
utility or from an independent storage provider (if available), and pay for that service, or
may opt to take no storage service at all. For core customers, the Commission assures that
the utility has adequate storage capacity set aside to meet core requirements, and core
customers pay for that service.
In a 1997 decision, the Commission adopted PG&E's "Gas Accord", which unbundled
PG&E's backbone transmission costs from noncore transportation rates. This decision
gave customers and marketers the opportunity to obtain pipeline capacity rights on
PG&E's backbone transmission pipeline system, if desired, and pay for that service at rates
authorized by the Commission. The Gas Accord also required PG&E to set aside a certain
amount of backbone transmission capacity in order to deliver gas to its core
customers. Subsequent Commission decisions modified and extended the initial terms of
the Gas Accord. The "Gas Accord" framework is still in place today for PG&E's backbone
and storage rates and services and is now simply referred to as PG&E Gas Transmission
and Storage (GT&S).
In a 2006 decision, the Commission adopted a similar gas transmission framework for
Southern California, called the "firm access rights" system. SoCalGas and SDG&E
implemented the firm access rights (FAR) system in 2008, and it is now referred to as the
backbone transmission system (BTS) framework. As under the PG&E backbone
transmission system, SoCalGas backbone transmission costs are unbundled from noncore
transportation rates. Noncore customers and marketers may obtain, and pay for, firm
backbone transmission capacity at various receipt points on the SoCalGas system. A
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
15
certain amount of backbone transmission capacity is obtained for core customers to
assure meeting their requirements.
Many if not most noncore customers now use a marketer to provide for several of the
services formerly provided by the utility. That is, a noncore customer may simply arrange
for a marketer to procure its supplies, and obtain any needed storage and backbone
transmission capacity, in order to assure that it will receive its needed deliveries of natural
gas supplies. Core customers still mainly rely on the utilities for procurement service, but
they have the option to take procurement service from a CTA. Backbone transmission and
storage capacity is either set aside or obtained for core customers in amounts to assure
very high levels of service.
In order properly operate their natural gas transmission pipeline and storage systems,
PG&E and SoCalGas must balance the amount of gas received into the pipeline system and
delivered to customers or to storage fields. Some of these utilities’ storage capacity is
dedicated to this service, and under most circumstances, customers do not need to
precisely match their deliveries with their consumption. However, when too much or too
little gas is expected to be delivered into the utilities’ systems, relative to the amount being
consumed, the utilities require customers to more precisely match up their deliveries with
their consumption. And, if customers do not meet certain delivery requirements, they
could face financial penalties. The utilities do not profit from these financial penalties -
the amounts are then returned to customers as a whole. If the utilities find that they are
unable to deliver all the gas that is expected to be consumed, they may even call for a
curtailment of some gas deliveries. These curtailments are typically required for just the
largest, noncore customers. It has been many years since there has been a significant
curtailment of core customers in California.” (16)
As indicated in the preceding discussions, natural gas is available from a variety of in-State and
out-of-State sources and is provided throughout the State in response to market supply and
demand. Complementing available natural gas resources, biogas may soon be available via
existing delivery systems, thereby increasing the availability and reliability of resources in total.
The CPUC oversees utility purchases and transmission of natural gas to ensure reliable and
affordable natural gas deliveries to existing and new consumers throughout the State.
Based on information provided by the Project applicant, no natural gas would be used as a result
of the Project, and as such use of natural gas is not considered in the analysis.
2.4 TRANSPORTATION ENERGY RESOURCES
The Project would generate additional vehicle trips with resulting consumption of energy
resources, predominantly gasoline and diesel fuel. The Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV)
identified 36.2 million registered vehicles in California (17), and those vehicles consume an
estimated 17.2 billion gallons of fuel each year1. Gasoline (and other vehicle fuels) are
1 Fuel consumptions estimated utilizing information from EMFAC2021.
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
16
commercially provided commodities and would be available to the Project patrons and
employees via commercial outlets.
California’s on-road transportation system includes 396,616 lane miles, more than 26.6 million
passenger vehicles and light trucks, and almost 9.0 million medium- and heavy-duty vehicles (17).
While gasoline consumption has been declining since 2008 it is still by far the dominant fuel.
California is the second-largest consumer of petroleum products, after Texas, and accounts for
10% of the nation's total consumption. The state is the largest U.S. consumer of motor gasoline
and jet fuel, and 85% of the petroleum consumed in California is used in the transportation sector
(18).
California accounts for less than 1% of total U.S. natural gas reserves and production. As with
crude oil, California's natural gas production has experienced a gradual decline since 1985. In
2019, about 37% of the natural gas delivered to consumers went to the state's industrial sector,
and about 28% was delivered to the electric power sector. Natural gas fueled more than two-
fifths of the State's utility-scale electricity generation in 2019. The residential sector, where two-
thirds of California households use natural gas for home heating, accounted for 22% of natural
gas deliveries. The commercial sector received 12% of the deliveries to end users and the
transportation sector consumed the remaining 1% (18).
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
17
This page intentionally left blank
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
18
3 REGULATORY BACKGROUND
Federal and State agencies regulate energy use and consumption through various means and
programs. On the federal level, the United States Department of Transportation, the United
States Department of Energy, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are
three federal agencies with substantial influence over energy policies and programs. On the State
level, the CPUC and the CEC are two agencies with authority over different aspects of energy.
Relevant federal and state energy-related laws and plans are summarized below.
3.1 FEDERAL REGULATIONS
3.1.1 INTERMODAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY ACT OF 1991 (ISTEA)
The ISTEA promoted the development of inter-modal transportation systems to maximize
mobility as well as address national and local interests in air quality and energy. ISTEA contained
factors that Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) were to address in developing
transportation plans and programs, including some energy-related factors. To meet the new
ISTEA requirements, MPOs adopted explicit policies defining the social, economic, energy, and
environmental values guiding transportation decisions.
3.1.2 THE TRANSPORTATION EQUITY ACT FOR THE 21ST CENTURY (TEA-21)
The TEA-21 was signed into law in 1998 and builds upon the initiatives established in the ISTEA
legislation, discussed above. TEA-21 authorizes highway, highway safety, transit, and other
efficient surface transportation programs. TEA-21 continues the program structure established
for highways and transit under ISTEA, such as flexibility in the use of funds, emphasis on measures
to improve the environment, and focus on a strong planning process as the foundation of good
transportation decisions. TEA-21 also provides for investment in research and its application to
maximize the performance of the transportation system through, for example, deployment of
Intelligent Transportation Systems, to help improve operations and management of
transportation systems and vehicle safety.
3.2 CALIFORNIA REGULATIONS
3.2.1 INTEGRATED ENERGY POLICY REPORT (IEPR)
Senate Bill 1389 (Bowen, Chapter 568, Statutes of 2002) requires the CEC to prepare a biennial
integrated energy policy report that assesses major energy trends and issues facing the state’s
electricity, natural gas, and transportation fuel sectors and provides policy recommendations to
conserve resources; protect the environment; ensure reliable, secure, and diverse energy
supplies; enhance the state’s economy; and protect public health and safety (Public Resources
Code § 25301[a]). The CEC prepares these assessments and associated policy recommendations
every two years, with updates in alternate years, as part of the Integrated Energy Policy Report.
The 2022 IEPR was adopted February 2023, and continues to work towards improving electricity,
natural gas, and transportation fuel energy use in California. The 2022 IEPR introduces a new
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
19
framework for embedding equity and environmental justice at the CEC and the California Energy
Planning Library which allows for easier access to energy data and analytics for a wide range of
users. Additionally, energy reliability, western electricity integration, gasoline cost factors and
price spikes, the role of hydrogen in California’s clean energy future, fossil gas transition and
distributed energy resources are topics discussed within the 2022 IEPR (19).
3.2.2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY PLAN
The CEC is responsible for preparing the State Energy Plan, which identifies emerging trends
related to energy supply, demand, conservation, public health and safety, and the maintenance
of a healthy economy. The Plan calls for the state to assist in the transformation of the
transportation system to improve air quality, reduce congestion, and increase the efficient use
of fuel supplies with the least environmental and energy costs. To further this policy, the plan
identifies several strategies, including assistance to public agencies and fleet operators and
encouragement of urban designs that reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and accommodate
pedestrian and bicycle access.
3.2.3 CALIFORNIA CODE TITLE 24, PART 6, ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS
California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24 Part 6: The California Energy Code was first
adopted in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California’s energy consumption.
The standards are updated periodically to allow consideration and possible incorporation of
new energy efficient technologies and methods. CCR, Title 24, Part 11: California Green
Building Standards Code (CALGreen) is a comprehensive and uniform regulatory code for all
residential, commercial, and school buildings that went in effect on August 1, 2009, and is
administered by the California Building Standards Commission.
CALGreen is updated on a regular basis, with the most recent approved update consisting of the
2022 California Green Building Code Standards that will be effective on January 1, 2023. The CEC
anticipates that the 2022 energy code will provide $1.5 billion in consumer benefits and reduce
GHG emissions by 10 million metric tons (20). The Project would be required to comply with the
applicable standards in place at the time building permit document submittals are made. These
require, among other items (21):
NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES
• Short-term bicycle parking. If the new project or an additional alteration is anticipated to
generate visitor traffic, provide permanently anchored bicycle racks within 200 feet of the
visitors’ entrance, readily visible to passers-by, for 5% of new visitor motorized vehicle
parking spaces being added, with a minimum of one two-bike capacity rack
(5.106.4.1.1).
• Long-term bicycle parking. For new buildings with tenant spaces that have 10 or more
tenant-occupants, provide secure bicycle parking for 5% of the tenant-occupant vehicular
parking spaces with a minimum of one bicycle parking facility (5.106.4.1.2).
• Designated parking for clean air vehicles. In new projects or additions to alterations that
add 10 or more vehicular parking spaces, provide designated parking for any combination of
low-emitting, fuel-efficient and carpool/van pool vehicles as shown in Table 5.106.5.2 (5.106.5.2).
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
20
• EV charging stations. New construction shall facilitate the future installation of EV supply
equipment. The compliance requires empty raceways for future conduit and documentation that
the electrical system has adequate capacity for the future load. The number of spaces to be
provided for is contained in Table 5.106. 5.3.3 (5.106.5.3). Additionally, Table 5.106.5.4.1
specifies requirements for the installation of raceway conduit and panel power requirements for
medium- and heavy-duty electric vehicle supply equipment for warehouses, grocery stores, and
retail stores.
• Outdoor light pollution reduction. Outdoor lighting systems shall be designed to meet the
backlight, uplight and glare ratings per Table 5.106.8 (5.106.8).
• Construction waste management. Recycle and/or salvage for reuse a minimum of 65% of
the nonhazardous construction and demolition waste in accordance with Section
5.408.1.1. 5.405.1.2, or 5.408.1.3; or meet a local construction and demolition waste
management ordinance, whichever is more stringent (5.408.1).
• Excavated soil and land clearing debris. 100% of trees, stumps, rocks and associated
vegetation and soils resulting primarily from land clearing shall be reuse or recycled. For a
phased project, such material may be stockpiled on site until the storage site is developed
(5.408.3).
• Recycling by Occupants. Provide readily accessible areas that serve the entire building and are
identified for the depositing, storage, and collection of non-hazardous materials for
recycling, including (at a minimum) paper, corrugated cardboard, glass, plastics, organic
waste, and metals or meet a lawfully enacted local recycling ordinance, if more restrictive
(5.410.1).
• Water conserving plumbing fixtures and fittings. Plumbing fixtures (water closets and
urinals) and fittings (faucets and showerheads) shall comply with the following:
o Water Closets. The effective flush volume of all water closets shall not exceed
1.28 gallons per flush (5.303.3.1)
o Urinals. The effective flush volume of wall-mounted urinals shall not exceed
0.125 gallons per flush (5.303.3.2.1). The effective flush volume of floor- mounted or
other urinals shall not exceed 0.5 gallons per flush (5.303.3.2.2).
o Showerheads. Single showerheads shall have a minimum flow rate of not more than 1.8
gallons per minute and 80 psi (5.303.3.3.1). When a shower is served by more than one
showerhead, the combine flow rate of all showerheads and/or other shower outlets
controlled by a single valve shall not exceed 1.8 gallons per minute at 80 psi (5.303.3.3.2).
o Faucets and fountains. Nonresidential lavatory faucets shall have a maximum flow
rate of not more than 0.5 gallons per minute at 60 psi (5.303.3.4.1). Kitchen faucets shall
have a maximum flow rate of not more than 1.8 gallons per minute of 60 psi
(5.303.3.4.2). Wash fountains shall have a maximum flow rate of not more than 1.8
gallons per minute (5.303.3.4.3). Metering faucets shall not deliver more than 0.20
gallons per cycle (5.303.3.4.4). Metering faucets for wash fountains shall have a
maximum flow rate not more than 0.20 gallons per cycle (5.303.3.4.5).
• Outdoor potable water uses in landscaped areas. Nonresidential developments shall comply
with a local water efficient landscape ordinance or the current California Department of
Water Resources’ Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO), whichever is more
stringent (5.304.1).
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
21
• Water meters. Separate submeters or metering devices shall be installed for new
buildings or additions in excess of 50,000 sf or for excess consumption where any tenant
within a new building or within an addition that is project to consume more than 1,000
gallons per day (GPD) (5.303.1.1 and 5.303.1.2).
• Outdoor water uses in rehabilitated landscape projects equal or greater than 2,500 sf.
Rehabilitated landscape projects with an aggregate landscape area equal to or greater than
2,500 sf requiring a building or landscape permit (5.304.3).
• Commissioning. For new buildings 10,000 sf and over, building commissioning shall be
included in the design and construction processes of the building project to verify that the
building systems and components meet the owner’s or owner representative’s project
requirements (5.410.2).
3.2.4 AB 1493 PAVLEY REGULATIONS AND FUEL EFFICIENCY STANDARDS
California AB 1493, enacted on July 22, 2002, required CARB to develop and adopt regulations
that reduce GHGs emitted by passenger vehicles and light duty trucks. Under this legislation,
CARB adopted regulations to reduce GHG emissions from non-commercial passenger vehicles
(cars and light-duty trucks). Although aimed at reducing GHG emissions, specifically, a co-benefit
of the Pavley standards is an improvement in fuel efficiency and consequently a reduction in fuel
consumption.
3.2.5 CALIFORNIA’S RENEWABLE PORTFOLIO STANDARD (RPS)
First established in 2002 under Senate Bill (SB) 1078, California’s Renewable Portfolio Standards
(RPS) requires retail sellers of electric services to increase procurement from eligible renewable
resources to 33% of total retail sales by 2020 (22).
3.2.6 CLEAN ENERGY AND POLLUTION REDUCTION ACT OF 2015 (SB 350)
In October 2015, the legislature approved, and the Governor signed SB 350, which reaffirms
California’s commitment to reducing its GHG emissions and addressing climate change. Key
provisions include an increase in the renewables portfolio standard (RPS), higher energy
efficiency requirements for buildings, initial strategies towards a regional electricity grid, and
improved infrastructure for electric vehicle charging stations. Specifically, SB 350 requires the
following to reduce statewide GHG emissions:
• Increase the amount of electricity procured from renewable energy sources from 33% to 50% by
2030, with interim targets of 40% by 2024, and 25% by 2027.
• Double the energy efficiency in existing buildings by 2030. This target will be achieved through
the California Public Utility Commission (CPUC), the California Energy Commission (CEC), and local
publicly owned utilities.
• Reorganize the Independent System Operator (ISO) to develop more regional electrify
transmission markets and to improve accessibility in these markets, which will facilitate the
growth of renewable energy markets in the western United States (California Leginfo 2015).
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
22
3.2.7 100 PERCENT CLEAN ENERGY ACT OF 2018 (SB 100)
In September 2018, the legislature approved, and the Governor signed SB 100, which builds on
the targets established in SB 1078 and SB 350. Most notably, SB 100 sets a goal of powering all
retail electricity sold in California with renewable and zero-carbon resources. Additionally, SB 100
updates the interim renewables target from 50% to 60% by 2030.
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
23
This page intentionally left blank
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
24
4 PROJECT ENERGY DEMANDS AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY MEASURES
4.1 EVALUATION CRITERIA
Per Appendix F of the State CEQA Guidelines (23), states that the means of achieving the goal of
energy conservation includes the following:
• Decreasing overall per capita energy consumption;
• Decreasing reliance on fossil fuels such as coal, natural gas, and oil; and
• Increasing reliance on renewable energy sources.
In compliance with Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines (1), this report analyzes the project’s
anticipated energy use during construction and operations to determine if the Project would:
• Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary
consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation; or
• Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency.
4.2 METHODOLOGY
Information from the CalEEMod Version 2022.1. outputs for the Almond & Valley Distribution
Center Air Quality Impact Analysis (AQIA) (24) was utilized in this analysis, detailing Project
related construction equipment, transportation energy demands, and facility energy demands.
4.2.1 CALEEMOD
In May 2022 California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) in conjunction with
other California air districts, including SCAQMD, released the latest version of the CalEEMod
Version 2022.1. The purpose of this model is to calculate construction-source and operational-
source criteria pollutants and GHG emissions from direct and indirect sources as well as energy
usage (25). Accordingly, the latest version of CalEEMod has been used to determine the proposed
Project’s anticipated transportation and facility energy demands. Outputs from the annual model
runs are provided in Appendices 4.1.
4.2.2 EMISSION FACTORS MODEL
On May 2, 2022, the EPA approved the 2021 version of the EMissions FACtor model (EMFAC) web
database for use in State Implementation Plan and transportation conformity analyses.
EMFAC2021 is a mathematical model that was developed to calculate emission rates, fuel
consumption, VMT from motor vehicles that operate on highways, freeways, and local roads in
California and is commonly used by the CARB to project changes in future emissions from on-
road mobile sources (26). This energy study utilizes the different fuel types for each vehicle class
from the annual EMFAC2021 emission inventory in order to derive the average vehicle fuel
economy which is then used to determine the estimated annual fuel consumption associated
with vehicle usage during Project construction and operational activities. For purposes of
analysis, the 2023, 2024 and 2025 analysis years were utilized to determine the average vehicle
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
25
fuel economy used throughout the duration of the Project. Output from the EMFAC2021 model
run is provided in Appendix 4.3.
4.3 CONSTRUCTION ENERGY DEMANDS
The focus within this section is the energy implications of the construction process, specifically
the power cost from on-site electricity consumption during construction of the proposed Project.
4.3.1 CONSTRUCTION POWER COST
The total Project construction power costs is the summation of the products of the area (sf) by
the construction duration and the typical power cost.
CONSTRUCTION DURATION
Construction is anticipated to begin in November 2024 and will last through October 2025 (24).
The construction schedule utilized in the analysis, shown in Table 4-1, represents a “worst-case”
analysis scenario. The duration of construction activity and associated equipment represents a
reasonable approximation of the expected construction fleet as required per CEQA Guidelines
(27).
TABLE 4-1: CONSTRUCTION DURATION
Construction Activity Start Date End Date Days
Demolition 11/1/2024 12/12/2024 30
Site Preparation 12/13/2024 12/19/2024 5
Grading 1/28/2025 3/3/2025 25
Building Construction 3/3/2025 10/24/2025 170
Paving 9/22/2025 10/10/2025 15
Architectural Coating 9/15/2025 10/10/2025 20
PROJECT CONSTRUCTION POWER COST
The 2023 National Construction Estimator identifies a typical power cost per 1,000 sf of
construction per month of $2.50, which was used to calculate the Project’s total construction
power cost (28).
As shown on Table 4-2, the total power cost of the on-site electricity usage during the
construction of the Project is estimated to be approximately $14,457.22.
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
26
TABLE 4-2: CONSTRUCTION POWER COST
Land Use Power Cost
(per 1,000 SF)
Size
(1,000 SF)
Construction
Duration
(months)
Project
Construction
Power Cost
High-Cube Cold Storage Warehouse $2.50 55.112 11 $1,515.58
High-Cube Fulfillment Center Warehouse $2.50 220.448 11 $6,062.32
Parking Lot $2.50 77.537 11 $2,132.27
Landscape $2.50 38.020 11 $1,045.55
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces $2.50 134.600 11 $3,701.50
CONSTRUCTION POWER COST $14,457.22
4.3.2 CONSTRUCTION ELECTRICITY USAGE
The total Project construction electricity usage is the summation of the products of the power
cost (estimated in Table 4-2) by the utility provider cost per kilowatt hour (kWh) of electricity.
PROJECT CONSTRUCTION ELECTRICITY USAGE
The SCE’s general service rate schedule was used to determine the Project’s electrical usage. As
of January 1, 2023, SCE’s general service rate is $0.13 per kilowatt hours (kWh) of electricity for
industrial services (29). As shown on Table 4-3, the total electricity usage from on-site Project
construction related activities is estimated to be approximately 109,757 kWh.
TABLE 4-3: CONSTRUCTION ELECTRICITY USAGE
Land Use Cost per kWh
Project
Construction
Electricity Usage
(kWh)
High-Cube Cold Storage Warehouse $0.13 11,506
High-Cube Fulfillment Center Warehouse $0.13 46,024
Parking Lot $0.13 16,188
Landscape $0.13 7,938
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces $0.13 28,101
CONSTRUCTION ELECTRICITY USAGE 109,757
4.3.3 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FUEL ESTIMATES
Fuel consumed by construction equipment would be the primary energy resource expended over
the course of Project construction.
CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
A summary of construction equipment by phase is provided on Table 4-4. Consistent with
industry standards and typical construction practices, each piece of equipment listed in Table 4-
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
27
4 will operate up to a total of eight (8) hours per day, or more than two-thirds of the period during
which construction activities are allowed pursuant to the Code.
TABLE 4-4: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ASSUMPTIONS
Construction Activity Equipment Amount Hours Per Day
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8
Excavators 3 8
Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8
Crawler Tractors 4 8
Grading
Excavators 2 8
Graders 1 8
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8
Scrapers 2 8
Crawler Tractors 2 8
Building Construction
Cranes 1 8
Forklifts 3 8
Generator Sets 1 8
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8
Welders 1 8
Paving
Pavers 2 8
Paving Equipment 2 8
Rollers 2 8
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 8
PROJECT CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FUEL CONSUMPTION
Project construction activity timeline estimates, construction equipment schedules, equipment
power ratings, load factors, and associated fuel consumption estimates are presented in Table 4-
5. The aggregate fuel consumption rate for all equipment is estimated at 18.5 horsepower hour
per gallon (hp-hr-gal.), obtained from CARB 2018 Emissions Factors Tables and cited fuel
consumption rate factors presented in Table D-24 of the Moyer guidelines (30). For the purposes
of this analysis, the calculations are based on all construction equipment being diesel-powered
which is consistent with industry standards. Diesel fuel would be supplied by existing commercial
fuel providers serving the Project area and region2. As presented in Table 4-5, Project
2 Based on Appendix A of the CalEEMod User’s Guide, Construction consists of several types of off-road equipment. Since the majority of the off-road construction equipment used for construction projects are diesel fueled, CalEEMod assumes all of the equipment operates on diesel fuel.
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
28
construction activities would consume an estimated 35,434 gallons of diesel fuel. Project
construction would represent a “single-event” diesel fuel demand and would not require on-
going or permanent commitment of diesel fuel resources for this purpose.
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
29
TABLE 4-5: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES
Construction Activity Duration
(Days) Equipment HP Rating Quantity Usage
Hours
Load
Factor
HP-
hrs/day
Total Fuel
Consumption
Demolition 30
Concrete/Industrial Saws 33 1 8 0.73 193 313
Excavators 36 3 8 0.38 328 532
Rubber Tired Dozers 367 2 8 0.4 2,349 3,809
Site Preparation 5 Rubber Tired Dozers 367 3 8 0.4 3,523 952
Crawler Tractors 87 4 8 0.43 1,197 324
Grading 25
Excavators 36 2 8 0.38 219 296
Graders 148 1 8 0.41 485 656
Rubber Tired Dozers 367 1 8 0.4 1,174 1,587
Scrapers 423 2 8 0.48 3,249 4,390
Crawler Tractors 87 2 8 0.43 599 809
Building Construction 170
Cranes 367 1 8 0.29 851 7,824
Forklifts 82 3 8 0.2 394 3,617
Generator Sets 14 1 8 0.74 83 762
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 84 3 8 0.37 746 6,854
Welders 46 1 8 0.45 166 1,522
Paving 15
Pavers 81 2 8 0.42 544 441
Paving Equipment 89 2 8 0.36 513 416
Rollers 36 2 8 0.38 219 177
Architectural Coating 20 Air Compressors 37 1 8 0.48 142 154
CONSTRUCTION FUEL DEMAND (GALLONS DIESEL FUEL) 35,434
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
30
4.3.3 CONSTRUCTION TRIPS AND VMT
Construction generates on-road vehicle emissions from vehicle usage for workers, vendors, and
haul truck commuting to and from the site. The number of workers, vendor, and haul trips are
presented below in Table 4-6. It should be noted that for vendor trips, specifically, CalEEMod only
assigns vendor trips to the Building Construction phase. Vendor trips would likely occur during all
phases of construction. As such, the CalEEMod defaults for vendor trips have been adjusted
based on a ratio of the total vendor trips to the number of days of each subphase of activity.
TABLE 4-6: CONSTRUCTION TRIPS AND VMT
Construction Activity Worker Trips
Per Day
Vendor Trips
Per Day
Hauling Trips
Per Day
Demolition 15 6 3
Site Preparation 17.5 1 0
Grading 20 5 0
Building Construction 116 33 0
Paving 15 0 0
Architectural Coating 23 0 0
4.3.4 CONSTRUCTION WORKER FUEL ESTIMATES
With respect to estimated VMT for the Project, the construction worker trips (personal vehicles
used by workers commuting to the Project from home) would generate an estimated 428,016
VMT during the 11 months of construction (24). Based on CalEEMod methodology, it is assumed
that 50% of all construction worker trips are from light-duty-auto vehicles (LDA), 25% are from
light-duty-trucks (LDT13), and 25% are from light-duty-trucks (LDT24). Data regarding Project
related construction worker trips were based on CalEEMod defaults utilized within the AQIA.
Vehicle fuel efficiencies for LDA, LDT1, and LDT2 were estimated using information generated
within the 2021 version of the EMFAC developed by CARB. EMFAC2021 is a mathematical model
that was developed to calculate emission rates, fuel consumption, and VMT from motor vehicles
that operate on highways, freeways, and local roads in California and is commonly used by the
CARB to project changes in future emissions from on-road mobile sources (26). EMFAC2021 was
run for the LDA, LDT1, and LDT2 vehicle class within the San Bernardino (SC) sub-area for the
2024 through 2025 calendar years. Data from EMFAC2021 is shown in Appendix 4.3.
Table 4-7 provides an estimated annual fuel consumption resulting from Project construction
worker trips. Based on Table 4-7, it is estimated that 15,332 gallons of fuel will be consumed
related to construction worker trips during full construction of the Project.
3 Vehicles under the LDT1 category have a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of less than 6,000 lbs. and equivalent test weight (ETW) of less
than or equal to 3,750 lbs. 4 Vehicles under the LDT2 category have a GVWR of less than 6,000 lbs. and ETW between 3,751 lbs. and 5,750 lbs.
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
31
TABLE 4-7: CONSTRUCTION WORKER FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES
Year Construction Activity Duration
(Days)
Worker
Trips/Day
Trip
Length
(miles)
VMT
Average Vehicle
Fuel Economy
(mpg)
Estimated Fuel
Consumption
(gallons)
2024
LDA
Demolition 30 8 18.5 4,440 31.57 141
Site Preparation 5 9 18.5 833 31.57 26
LDT1
Demolition 30 4 18.5 2,220 24.59 90
Site Preparation 5 5 18.5 463 24.59 19
LDT2
Demolition 30 5 18.5 2,775 24.51 113
Site Preparation 5 5 18.5 463 24.51 19
2025
LDA
Grading 25 10 18.5 4,625 32.57 142
Building Construction 170 58 18.5 182,410 32.57 5,601
Paving 15 8 18.5 2,220 32.57 68
Architectural Coating 20 12 18.5 4,440 32.57 136
LDT1
Grading 25 5 18.5 2,313 25.11 92
Building Construction 170 29 18.5 91,205 25.11 3,632
Paving 15 4 18.5 1,110 25.11 44
Architectural Coating 20 6 18.5 2,220 25.11 88
LDT2
Grading 25 5 18.5 2,313 25.24 92
Building Construction 170 5 18.5 15,725 25.24 623
Paving 15 29 18.5 8,048 25.24 319
Architectural Coating 20 4 18.5 1,480 25.24 59
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION WORKER FUEL CONSUMPTION 15,332
It should be noted that construction worker trips would represent a “single-event” gasoline fuel
demand and would not require on-going or permanent commitment of fuel resources for this
purpose.
4.3.5 CONSTRUCTION VENDOR/HAULING FUEL ESTIMATES
With respect to estimated VMT, the construction vendor trips (vehicles that deliver materials to
the site during construction) would generate an estimated 64,224 VMT along area roadways for
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
32
the Project over the duration of construction activity (24). It is assumed that 50% of all vendor
trips are from medium-heavy duty trucks (MHD), 50% of all vendor trips are from heavy-heavy
duty trucks (HHD), and 100% of all hauling trips are from HHDs. These assumptions are consistent
with the CalEEMod defaults utilized within the within the AQIA (24). Vehicle fuel efficiencies for
MHDs and HHDs were estimated using information generated within EMFAC2021. EMFAC2021
was run for the MHD and HHD vehicle classes within the San Bernardino (SC) sub-area for the
2024 and 2025 calendar years. Data from EMFAC2021 is shown in Appendix 4.3.
Based on Table 4-8, it is estimated that 9,085 gallons of fuel will be consumed related to
construction vendor trips during full construction of the Project. It should be noted that Project
construction vendor trips would represent a “single-event” diesel fuel demand and would not
require on-going or permanent commitment of diesel fuel resources for this purpose.
TABLE 4-8: CONSTRUCTION VENDOR FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES
Year Construction Activity Duration (Days)
Vendor/
Hauling
Trips/Day
Trip
Length
(miles)
VMT
Average Vehicle
Fuel Economy
(mpg)
Estimated Fuel
Consumption
(gallons)
2024
MHDT
Demolition 30 3 10.2 918 8.34 110
Site Preparation 5 1 10.2 51 8.34 6
HHDT (Vendor)
Demolition 30 3 10.2 918 6.03 152
Site Preparation 5 1 10.2 51 6.03 8
HHDT (Hauling)
Demolition 30 3 20 1,800 6.03 299
2025
MHDT
Grading 25 3 10.2 765 8.46 90
Building Construction 170 17 10.2 29,478 8.46 3,485
HHDT (Vendor)
Grading 25 3 10.2 765 6.13 125
Building Construction 170 17 10.2 29,478 6.13 4,809
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION VENDOR/HAULING FUEL CONSUMPTION 9,085
4.3.6 CONSTRUCTION ENERGY EFFICIENCY/CONSERVATION MEASURES
Starting in 2014, CARB adopted the nation's first regulation aimed at cleaning up off-road
construction equipment such as bulldozers, graders, and backhoes. These requirements ensure
fleets gradually turnover the oldest and dirtiest equipment to newer, cleaner models and prevent
fleets from adding older, dirtier equipment. As such, the equipment used for Project construction
would conform to CARB regulations and California emissions standards. It should also be noted
that there are no unusual Project characteristics or construction processes that would require
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
33
the use of equipment that would be more energy intensive than is used for comparable activities;
or equipment that would not conform to current emissions standards (and related fuel
efficiencies). Equipment employed in construction of the Project would therefore not result in
inefficient wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of fuel.
Construction contractors would be required to comply with applicable CARB regulation regarding
retrofitting, repowering, or replacement of diesel off-road construction equipment. Additionally,
CARB has adopted the Airborne Toxic Control Measure to limit heavy-duty diesel motor vehicle
idling in order to reduce public exposure to diesel particulate matter and other Toxic Air
Contaminants. Compliance with anti-idling and emissions regulations would result in a more
efficient use of construction-related energy and the minimization or elimination of wasteful or
unnecessary consumption of energy. Idling restrictions and the use of newer engines and
equipment would result in less fuel combustion and energy consumption.
Additional construction-source energy efficiencies would occur due to required California
regulations and best available control measures (BACM). For example, CCR Title 13, Motor
Vehicles, section 2449(d)(3) Idling, limits idling times of construction vehicles to no more than
five minutes, thereby precluding unnecessary and wasteful consumption of fuel due to
unproductive idling of construction equipment. Section 2449(d)(3) requires that grading plans
shall reference the requirement that a sign shall be posted on-site stating that construction
workers need to shut off engines at or before five minutes of idling.” In this manner, construction
equipment operators are required to be informed that engines are to be turned off at or prior to
five minutes of idling. Enforcement of idling limitations is realized through periodic site
inspections conducted by City building officials, and/or in response to citizen complaints.
A full analysis related to the energy needed to form construction materials is not included in this
analysis due to a lack of detailed Project-specific information on construction materials. At this
time, an analysis of the energy needed to create Project-related construction materials would be
extremely speculative and thus has not been prepared.
In general, the construction processes promote conservation and efficient use of energy by
reducing raw materials demands, with related reduction in energy demands associated with raw
materials extraction, transportation, processing, and refinement. Use of materials in bulk reduces
energy demands associated with preparation and transport of construction materials as well as
the transport and disposal of construction waste and solid waste in general, with corollary
reduced demands on area landfill capacities and energy consumed by waste transport and landfill
operations.
4.4 OPERATIONAL ENERGY DEMANDS
Energy consumption in support of or related to Project operations would include transportation
fuel demands (fuel consumed by passenger car and truck vehicles accessing the Project site), fuel
demands from operational equipment, and facilities energy demands (energy consumed by
building operations and site maintenance activities).
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
34
4.4.1 TRANSPORTATION FUEL DEMANDS
EXISTING TRANSPORTATION ENERGY DEMANDS
The site is currently occupied with existing uses that are currently active. The estimated
transportation energy demands from the existing development are summarized on Table 4-9.
TABLE 4-9: EXISTING-GENERATED TRAFFIC ANNUAL FUEL CONSUMPTION
Vehicle Type Average Vehicle Fuel
Economy (mpg) Annual VMT Estimated Annual Fuel
Consumption (gallons)
LDA 30.68 343,693 11,201
LDT1 24.14 29,333 1,215
LDT2 23.82 133,548 5,607
MDV 14.71 105,941 7,203
MCY 14.71 14,523 988
LHD1 15.45 39,425 2,551
LHD2 14.71 10,559 718
MHDT 8.30 624,800 75,302
HHDT 5.94 1,499,521 252,395
TOTAL (ALL VEHICLES) 2,801,343 357,181
PROPOSED PROJECT TRANSPORTATION ENERGY DEMANDS
Energy that would be consumed by Project-generated traffic is a function of total VMT and
estimated vehicle fuel economies of vehicles accessing the Project site. The VMT per vehicle class
can be determined by evaluated in the vehicle fleet mix and the total VMT. As with worker and
vendors trips, operational vehicle fuel efficiencies were estimated using information generated
within EMFAC2021 developed by CARB (26). EMFAC2021 was run for the San Bernardino (SC)
sub-area for the 2024 and 2025 calendar years. Data from EMFAC2021 is shown in Appendix 4.3.
In order to account for the possibility of refrigerated uses (cold storage), it is assumed that all
trucks accessing this land use are presumed to also have transport refrigeration units (TRUs).
Therefore, for modeling purposes 23 trucks are assumed to be trucks with TRUs. TRUs are also
accounted for during on-site and off-site travel. The TRU calculations are based on EMFAC2021.
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
35
TABLE 4-10: TOTAL PROJECT-GENERATED TRAFFIC ANNUAL FUEL CONSUMPTION
Vehicle Type Average Vehicle Fuel
Economy (mpg) Annual VMT Estimated Annual Fuel
Consumption (gallons)
LDA 32.57 1,287,785 39,542
LDT1 25.11 101,616 4,046
LDT2 25.24 536,846 21,271
MDV 15.27 395,322 25,896
MCY 15.27 54,023 3,539
LHD1 16.22 189,528 11,688
LHD2 15.27 51,748 3,390
MHDT 8.46 144,765 17,117
HHDT 6.13 868,591 141,697
TRUs 21,430
TOTAL (ALL VEHICLES) 3,630,224 289,615
Existing Energy Demands 2,801,343 357,181
NET ENERGY DEMANDS (Proposed – Existing) 828,881 -67,566
The estimated transportation energy demands were previously summarized on Table 4-10. As
summarized on Table 4-10, the Project would result in a net increase of 828,881 annual VMT and
an estimated net decrease in annual fuel consumption of 67,566 gallons of fuel.
4.4.2 FACILITY ENERGY DEMANDS
Project building operations activities would result in the consumption of electricity, which would
be supplied to the Project by SCE. Annual electricity demands of the Project are summarized in
Table 4-11. As summarized on Table 4-11, the Project would result in 2,292,884 kWh/year of
electricity.
Based on information provided by the Project Applicant, the Project would not use natural gas
for the building envelope. As such, natural gas consumption has not been analyzed in this study.
TABLE 4-11: PROJECT ANNUAL OPERATIONAL ENERGY DEMAND SUMMARY
Land Use Electricity Demand
(kWh/year)
High-Cube Cold Storage Warehouse 1,206,701
High-Cube Fulfillment Center Warehouse 1,018,184
Parking Lot 67,999
TOTAL PROJECT ENERGY DEMAND 2,292,884
kWh - Kilo Watt Hours
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
36
4.4.3 OPERATIONAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY/CONSERVATION MEASURES
Energy efficiency/energy conservation attributes of the Project would be complemented by
increasingly stringent state and federal regulatory actions addressing vehicle fuel economies and
vehicle emissions standards; and enhanced building/utilities energy efficiencies mandated under
California building codes (e.g., Title24, California Green Building Standards Code).
ENHANCED VEHICLE FUEL EFFICIENCIES
Project annual fuel consumption estimates presented previously in Table 4-9 represent likely
potential maximums that would occur for the Project. Under subsequent future conditions,
average fuel economies of vehicles accessing the Project site can be expected to improve as
older, less fuel-efficient vehicles are removed from circulation, and in response to fuel economy
and emissions standards imposed on newer vehicles entering the circulation system.
Enhanced fuel economies realized pursuant to federal and State regulatory actions, and related
transition of vehicles to alternative energy sources (e.g., electricity, natural gas, biofuels,
hydrogen cells) would likely decrease future gasoline fuel demands per VMT. Location of the
Project proximate to regional and local roadway systems tends to reduce VMT within the region,
acting to reduce regional vehicle energy demands.
4.5 SUMMARY
4.5.1 CONSTRUCTION ENERGY DEMANDS
The estimated power cost of on-site electricity usage during the construction of the Project is
assumed to be approximately $14,457.22. Additionally, based on the assumed power cost, it is
estimated that the total electricity usage during construction, after full Project build-out, is
calculated to be approximately 109,757 kWh.
Construction equipment used by the Project would result in single event consumption of
approximately 35,434 gallons of diesel fuel. Construction equipment use of fuel would not be
atypical for the type of construction proposed because there are no aspects of the Project’s
proposed construction process that are unusual or energy-intensive, and Project construction
equipment would conform to the applicable CARB emissions standards, acting to promote
equipment fuel efficiencies.
CCR Title 13, Title 13, Motor Vehicles, section 2449(d)(3) Idling, limits idling times of construction
vehicles to no more than 5 minutes, thereby precluding unnecessary and wasteful consumption
of fuel due to unproductive idling of construction equipment. BACMs inform construction
equipment operators of this requirement. Enforcement of idling limitations is realized through
periodic site inspections conducted by City building officials, and/or in response to citizen
complaints.
Construction worker trips for full construction of the Project would result in the estimated fuel
consumption of 15,332 gallons of fuel. Additionally, fuel consumption from construction vendor
trips (MHDTs and HHDTs) will total approximately 9,085 gallons. Diesel fuel would be supplied by
City and regional commercial vendors. Indirectly, construction energy efficiencies and energy
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
37
conservation would be achieved using bulk purchases, transport and use of construction
materials. The 2022 IEPR released by the CEC has shown that fuel efficiencies are getting better
within on and off-road vehicle engines due to more stringent government requirements (19). As
supported by the preceding discussions, Project construction energy consumption would not be
considered inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary.
4.5.2 OPERATIONAL ENERGY DEMANDS
TRANSPORTATION ENERGY DEMANDS
Annual vehicular trips and related VMT generated by the operation of the Project would result in
a net decrease in fuel demand of 67,566 gallons of fuel.
Fuel would be provided by current and future commercial vendors. Trip generation and VMT
generated by the Project are consistent with other industrial uses of similar scale and
configuration, as reflected respectively in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip
Generation Manual (11th Ed., 2021); and CalEEMod. As such, Project operations would not result
in excessive and wasteful vehicle trips and VMT, nor excess and wasteful vehicle energy
consumption compared to other industrial uses.
It should be noted that the state strategy for the transportation sector for medium and heavy-
duty trucks is focused on making trucks more efficient and expediting truck turnover rather than
reducing VMT from trucks. This is in contrast to the passenger vehicle component of the
transportation sector where both per-capita VMT reductions and an increase in vehicle efficiency
are forecasted to be needed to achieve the overall state emissions reductions goals.
Heavy duty trucks involved in goods movements are generally controlled on the technology side
and through fleet turnover of older trucks and engines to newer and cleaner trucks and engines.
The first battery-electric heavy-heavy duty trucks are being tested this year and SCAQMD is
looking to integrate this new technology into large-scale truck operations. The following state
strategies reduce GHG emissions from the medium and heavy-duty trucks:
• CARB’s Mobile Source Strategy focuses on reducing GHGs through the transition to zero and low
emission vehicles and from medium-duty and heavy-duty trucks.
• CARB’s Sustainable Freight Action Plan establishes a goal to improve freight efficiency by 25
percent by 2030, deploy over 100,000 freight vehicles and equipment capable of zero emission
operation and maximize both zero and near-zero emission freight vehicles and equipment
powered by renewable energy by 2030.
• CARB’s Emissions Reduction Plan for Ports and Goods Movement (Goods Movement Plan) in
California focuses on reducing heavy-duty truck-related emissions focus on establishment of
emissions standards for trucks, fleet turnover, truck retrofits, and restriction on truck idling (CARB
2006). While the focus of Goods Movement Plan is to reduce criteria air pollutant and air toxic
emissions, the strategies to reduce these pollutants would also generally have a beneficial effect
in reducing GHG emissions.
• CARB’s On-Road Truck and Bus Regulation (2010) requires diesel trucks and buses that operate in
California to be upgraded to reduce emissions. Newer heavier trucks and buses must meet
particulate matter filter requirements beginning January 1, 2012. Lighter and older heavier trucks
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
38
must be replaced starting January 1, 2015. By January 1, 2023, nearly all trucks and buses will
need to have 2010 model year engines or equivalent (31).
• CARB’s Heavy-Duty (Tractor-Trailer) GHG Regulation requires SmartWay tractor trailers that
include idle-reduction technologies, aerodynamic technologies, and low-rolling resistant tires that
would reduce fuel consumption and associated GHG emissions.
The proposed Project would implement project design features that would facilitate the
accessibility, parking, and loading of trucks on site.
Enhanced fuel economies realized pursuant to federal and state regulatory actions, and related
transition of vehicles to alternative energy sources (e.g., electricity, natural gas, biofuels,
hydrogen cells) would likely decrease future gasoline fuel demands per VMT. Location of the
Project proximate to regional and local roadway systems tends to reduce VMT within the region,
acting to reduce regional vehicle energy demands. The Project would implement sidewalks,
facilitating and encouraging pedestrian access. Facilitating pedestrian and bicycle access would
reduce VMT and associated energy consumption. In compliance with the California Green
Building Standards Code and City requirements, the Project would promote the use of bicycles
as an alternative mean of transportation by providing short-term and/or long-term bicycle
parking accommodations. As supported by the preceding discussions, Project transportation
energy consumption would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary.
FACILITY ENERGY DEMANDS
Project facility operational energy demands are estimated at 2,292,884 kWh/year of electricity.
Electricity would be supplied by SCE. The Project proposes conventional industrial uses reflecting
contemporary energy efficient/energy conserving designs and operational programs. The Project
does not propose uses that are inherently energy intensive and the energy demands in total
would be comparable to other industrial uses of similar scale and configuration.
Lastly, the Project will comply with the applicable Title 24 standards. Compliance itself with
applicable Title 24 standards will ensure that the Project energy demands would not be
inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary.
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
39
This page intentionally left blank
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
40
5 CONCLUSIONS
5.1 ENERGY IMPACT 1
Would the Project result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or
operation?
As supported by the preceding analyses, Project construction and operations would not result in
the inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of energy. The Project would therefore not
cause or result in the need for additional energy producing or transmission facilities. The Project
would not engage in wasteful or inefficient uses of energy and aims to achieve energy
conservations goals within the State of California.
5.2 ENERGY IMPACT 2
Would the Project conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy
efficiency?
The Project’s consistency with the applicable State and local plans is discussed below.
CONSISTENCY WITH ISTEA
Transportation and access to the Project site is provided by the local and regional roadway
systems. The Project would not interfere with, nor otherwise obstruct intermodal transportation
plans or projects that may be realized pursuant to the ISTEA because SCAG is not planning for
intermodal facilities on or through the Project site.
CONSISTENCY WITH TEA-21
The Project site is located along major transportation corridors with proximate access to the
Interstate freeway system. The site selected for the Project facilitates access, acts to reduce
vehicle miles traveled, takes advantage of existing infrastructure systems, and promotes land use
compatibilities through collocation of similar uses. The Project supports the strong planning
processes emphasized under TEA-21. The Project is therefore consistent with, and would not
otherwise interfere with, nor obstruct implementation of TEA-21.
CONSISTENCY WITH IEPR
Electricity would be provided to the Project by SCE. SCE’s Clean Power and Electrification Pathway
(CPEP) white paper builds on existing state programs and policies. As such, the Project is
consistent with, and would not otherwise interfere with, nor obstruct implementation the goals
presented in the 2022 IEPR.
Additionally, the Project will comply with the applicable Title 24 standards which would ensure
that the Project energy demands would not be inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary.
As such, development of the proposed Project would support the goals presented in the 2022
IEPR.
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
41
CONSISTENCY WITH STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY PLAN
The Project site is located along major transportation corridors with proximate access to the
Interstate freeway system. The site selected for the Project facilitates access and takes advantage
of existing infrastructure systems. The Project therefore supports urban design and planning
processes identified under the State of California Energy Plan, is consistent with, and would not
otherwise interfere with, nor obstruct implementation of the State of California Energy Plan.
CONSISTENCY WITH CALIFORNIA CODE TITLE 24, PART 6, ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS
The 2022 version of Title 24 was adopted by the CEC and will become effective on January 1,
2023. As the Project building construction is anticipated in 2025, it is presumed that the Project
would be required to comply with the Title 24 standards in place at that time. Therefore, the
Project is would not result in a significant impact on energy resources (32). The proposed Project
would be subject to Title 24 standards.
CONSISTENCY WITH CALIFORNIA CODE TITLE 24, PART 11, CALGREEN
As previously stated, CCR, Title 24, Part 11: CALGreen is a comprehensive and uniform regulatory
code for all residential, commercial, and school buildings that went in effect on January 1, 2009,
and is administered by the California Building Standards Commission. CALGreen is updated on a
regular basis, with the most recent approved update consisting of the 2022 California Green
Building Code Standards that were published on July 1, 2022 and will become effective on January
1, 2023. The Project would be required to comply with the applicable standards in place at the
time plan check submittals are made.
CONSISTENCY WITH AB 1493
AB 1493 is not applicable to the Project as it is a statewide measure establishing vehicle emissions
standards. No feature of the Project would interfere with implementation of the requirements
under AB 1493.
CONSISTENCY WITH RPS
California’s RPS is not applicable to the Project as it is a statewide measure that establishes a
renewable energy mix. No feature of the Project would interfere with implementation of the
requirements under RPS.
CONSISTENCY WITH SB 350
The proposed Project would use energy from SCE, which have committed to diversify their
portfolio of energy sources by increasing energy from wind and solar sources. No feature of the
Project would interfere with implementation of SB 350. Additionally, the Project would be
designed and constructed to implement the energy efficiency measures for new industrial
developments and would include several measures designed to reduce energy consumption.
As shown above, the Project would not conflict with any of the state or local plans. As such, a less
than significant impact is expected.
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
42
5.3 ENERGY IMPACT 3
Would the Project achieve the goal of energy conservation by:
• Decreasing overall per capita energy consumption.
• Decreasing reliance on fossil fuels such as coal, natural gas and oil.
• Increasing reliance on renewable energy sources.
As previously stated, the proposed Project is subject to California Building Code requirements.
New buildings must achieve compliance with 2022 Building and Energy Efficiency Standards and
the 2022 California Green Building Standards requirements. It should be noted that though the
Project will comply with the applicable Title 24 standards which would ensure that the Project
energy demands would not be inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary.
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
43
This page intentionally left blank
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
44
6 REFERENCES
1. Association of Environmental Professionals. 2020 CEQA California Environmental Quality Act. 2020.
2. Urban Crossroads, Inc. Almond & Valley Distribution Trip Generation Assessment. February 2023.
3. Administration, U.S. Energy Information. California State Profile and Energy Estimates. [Online]
https://www.eia.gov/state/data.php?sid=CA#ConsumptionExpenditures.
4. U.S. Energy Information Administration. Use of Energy in the United States Explained Energy Use for
Transportation. [Online] https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/use-of-energy/transportation.php.
5. —. Use of Energy in the United States Explained Energy Use for Transportation. [Online]
https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/PET_CONS_PSUP_DC_NUS_MBBLPD_A.htm.
6. —. Prime Supplier Sales Volume, California, Annual. 2020.
7. —. California Energy Consumption by End-Use Sector. California State Profile and Energy Estimates.
[Online] https://www.eia.gov/state/?sid=CA#tabs-2.
8. —. California State Profile and Energy Estimates. [Online]
https://www.eia.gov/state/seds/sep_fuel/html/pdf/fuel_use_es.pdf.
9. —. California State Profile and Energy Estimates. [Online]
https://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_cons_sum_dcu_nus_m.htm.
10. California Energy Commission. 2021 Total System Electric Generation. CA.gov. [Online]
https://www.energy.ca.gov/data-reports/energy-almanac/california-electricity-data/2021-total-
system-electric-
generation#:~:text=Total%20generation%20for%20California%20was,from%2090%2C208%20GWh%
20in%202020)..
11. U.S. Energy Information Administration. California State Profile and Energy Estimates. [Online]
https://www.eia.gov/state/?sid=CA.
12. California Energy Commission. 2013 Integrated Energy Policy Report. 2013.
13. California ISO. Understanding the ISO. [Online]
http://www.caiso.com/about/Pages/OurBusiness/UnderstandingtheISO/default.aspx.
14. Southern California Edison. Southern California Edison's Service Area. [Online]
https://download.newsroom.edison.com/create_memory_file/?f_id=5cc32d492cfac24d21aecf4c
&content_verified=True.
15. Southern Californai Edison. 2021 Power Content Label. Southern California Edison. [Online]
https://www.sce.com/sites/default/files/custom-
files/Web%20files/2021%20Power%20Content%20Label.pdf.
16. California Public Utilities Commission. Natural Gas and California. [Online]
http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/general.aspx?id=4802.
17. Department of Motor Vehicles. State of California Department of Motor Vehicles Statistics For
Publication January Through December 2021. 2021.
18. United States Energy Information Administration. California Analysis. Energy Information
Administration. [Online] https://www.eia.gov/beta/states/states/ca/analysis.
19. California Energy Commission Staff. 2022 Integrated Energy Policy Report Update. [Online] 2022.
https://www.energy.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2023-
02/Adopted_2022_IEPR_Update_with_errata_ada.pdf.
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
45
20. California Energy Commission. Energy Commission Adopts Updated Building Standards to Improve
Efficiency, Reduce Emissions from Homes and Businesses. [Online] August 11, 2021.
https://www.energy.ca.gov/news/2021-08/energy-commission-adopts-updated-building-
standards-improve-efficiency-reduce-0.
21. California Department of General Services. 2022 CALGreen Code. CALGreen. [Online]
https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/CAGBC2022P1.
22. California Energy Commission. Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS). [Online] 2002.
http://www.energy.ca.gov/portfolio/.
23. State of California. California Environmental Quality Act Guideline, California Public Resources Code,
Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3,.
24. Urban Crossroads, Inc. Almond & Valley Distribution Center Warehouse Air Quality Impact Analysis.
2023.
25. California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). California Emissions Estimator Model
(CalEEMod). [Online] May 2022. www.caleemod.com.
26. California Department of Transportation. EMFAC Software. [Online]
http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/env/air/pages/emfac.htm.
27. State of California. 2019 CEQA California Environmental Quality Act. 2019.
28. Pray, Richard. 2023 National Construction Estimator. Carlsbad : Craftsman Book Company, 2023.
29. Southern California Edison. Schedule GS-1 General Service. Regulatory Information - Rates Pricing.
[Online] https://library.sce.com/content/dam/sce-
doclib/public/regulatory/tariff/electric/schedules/general-service-&-industrial-
rates/ELECTRIC_SCHEDULES_GS-1.pdf.
30. California Air Resources Board. Methods to Find the Cost-Effectiveness of Funding Air Quality
Projects For Evaluating Motor Vehicle Registration Fee Projects And Congestion Mitigation and Air
Quality Improvement (CMAQ) Projects, Emission Factor Tables. 2018.
31. —. Truck and Bus Regulation. [Online] https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/truck-and-bus-
regulation.
32. The California Energy Commission. 2022 Building Energy Efficiency Standards. California Energy
Commission. [Online] 2022. https://www.energy.ca.gov/programs-and-topics/programs/building-
energy-efficiency-standards/2022-building-energy-efficiency.
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
46
This page intentionally left blank
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
47
7 CERTIFICATIONS
The contents of this energy analysis report represent an accurate depiction of the environmental
impacts associated with the proposed Almond & Valley Distribution Center. The information
contained in this energy analysis report is based on the best available data at the time of
preparation. If you have any questions, please contact me directly at
hqureshi@urbanxroads.com.
Haseeb Qureshi
Principal
Urban Crossroads, Inc.
hqureshi@urbanxroads.com
EDUCATION
Master of Science in Environmental Studies
California State University, Fullerton • May 2010
Bachelor of Arts in Environmental Analysis and Design
University of California, Irvine • June 2006
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
AEP – Association of Environmental Planners
AWMA – Air and Waste Management Association
ASTM – American Society for Testing and Materials
PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS
Planned Communities and Urban Infill – Urban Land Institute • June 2011
Indoor Air Quality and Industrial Hygiene – EMSL Analytical • April 2008
Principles of Ambient Air Monitoring – California Air Resources Board • August 2007
AB2588 Regulatory Standards – Trinity Consultants • November 2006
Air Dispersion Modeling – Lakes Environmental • June 2006
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
This page intentionally left blank
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
APPENDIX 4.1:
CALEEMOD PROPOSED PROJECT EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
1 / 53
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report
Table of Contents
1. Basic Project Information
1.1. Basic Project Information
1.2. Land Use Types
1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector
2. Emissions Summary
2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
3. Construction Emissions Details
3.1. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated
3.3. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated
3.5. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated
3.7. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
2 / 53
3.9. Paving (2025) - Unmitigated
3.11. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated
4. Operations Emissions Details
4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use
4.1.1. Unmitigated
4.2. Energy
4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
4.3. Area Emissions by Source
4.3.2. Unmitigated
4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use
4.4.2. Unmitigated
4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use
4.5.2. Unmitigated
4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use
4.6.1. Unmitigated
4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
3 / 53
4.7.1. Unmitigated
4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type
4.8.1. Unmitigated
4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type
4.9.1. Unmitigated
4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated
4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated
4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated
5. Activity Data
5.1. Construction Schedule
5.2. Off-Road Equipment
5.2.1. Unmitigated
5.3. Construction Vehicles
5.3.1. Unmitigated
5.4. Vehicles
5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
4 / 53
5.5. Architectural Coatings
5.6. Dust Mitigation
5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
5.7. Construction Paving
5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors
5.9. Operational Mobile Sources
5.9.1. Unmitigated
5.10. Operational Area Sources
5.10.1. Hearths
5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
5.11. Operational Energy Consumption
5.11.1. Unmitigated
5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption
5.12.1. Unmitigated
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
5 / 53
5.13. Operational Waste Generation
5.13.1. Unmitigated
5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment
5.14.1. Unmitigated
5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
5.15.1. Unmitigated
5.16. Stationary Sources
5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
5.16.2. Process Boilers
5.17. User Defined
5.18. Vegetation
5.18.1. Land Use Change
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
5.18.2. Sequestration
5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
6 / 53
6. Climate Risk Detailed Report
6.1. Climate Risk Summary
6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
7. Health and Equity Details
7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
7.4. Health & Equity Measures
7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
8. User Changes to Default Data
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
7 / 53
1. Basic Project Information
1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name 15256 - 9813 Almond Ave
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s)2.80
Precipitation (days)6.40
Location 9813 Almond Ave, Fontana, CA 92335, USA
County San Bernardino-South Coast
City Fontana
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5286
EDFZ 10
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft)Landscape Area (sq
ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
55.1 1000sqft 1.27 55,112 38,020 ———
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
220 1000sqft 5.06 220,448 0.00 ———
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
8 / 53
Parking Lot 198 Space 1.78 0.00 0.00 ———
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
3.09 Acre 3.09 0.00 0.00 ———
User Defined
Industrial
276 User Defined Unit 0.00 0.00 0.00 ———
1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector
No measures selected
2. Emissions Summary
2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Un/Mit.TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.1.49 17.4 19.9 40.2 0.05 0.23 2.29 2.53 0.22 0.55 0.77 —7,506 7,506 0.34 0.27 10.9 7,605
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.1.91 17.3 30.9 59.7 0.10 0.29 5.90 6.00 0.28 2.74 2.84 —12,156 12,156 0.55 0.32 0.28 12,265
Average
Daily
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.0.55 1.36 6.99 14.1 0.02 0.07 1.06 1.13 0.07 0.28 0.34 —2,983 2,983 0.14 0.12 1.88 3,023
Annual
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.0.10 0.25 1.28 2.57 < 0.005 0.01 0.19 0.21 0.01 0.05 0.06 —494 494 0.02 0.02 0.31 500
2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
9 / 53
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily -
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
2025 1.49 17.4 19.9 40.2 0.05 0.23 2.29 2.53 0.22 0.55 0.77 —7,506 7,506 0.34 0.27 10.9 7,605
Daily -
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
2024 0.74 0.73 14.9 29.4 0.05 0.21 5.90 6.00 0.19 2.74 2.84 —5,558 5,558 0.23 0.10 0.05 5,581
2025 1.91 17.3 30.9 59.7 0.10 0.29 4.77 5.06 0.28 1.49 1.77 —12,156 12,156 0.55 0.32 0.28 12,265
Average
Daily
——————————————————
2024 0.05 0.05 1.23 2.00 < 0.005 0.02 0.13 0.15 0.02 0.05 0.06 —407 407 0.02 0.01 0.07 410
2025 0.55 1.36 6.99 14.1 0.02 0.07 1.06 1.13 0.07 0.28 0.34 —2,983 2,983 0.14 0.12 1.88 3,023
Annual ——————————————————
2024 0.01 0.01 0.22 0.37 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 —67.4 67.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 67.9
2025 0.10 0.25 1.28 2.57 < 0.005 0.01 0.19 0.21 0.01 0.05 0.06 —494 494 0.02 0.02 0.31 500
2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Un/Mit.TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.5.36 10.1 13.2 42.6 0.15 0.21 3.80 4.02 0.21 0.77 0.98 262 19,117 19,379 27.8 2.14 329 21,041
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.3.13 7.99 13.8 26.1 0.15 0.20 3.80 4.00 0.19 0.77 0.96 262 18,650 18,911 27.8 2.15 282 20,528
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
10 / 53
——————————————————Average
Daily
(Max)
Unmit.4.20 9.09 12.3 31.8 0.13 0.18 3.34 3.52 0.18 0.68 0.86 262 16,753 17,015 27.7 1.92 299 18,579
Annual
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.0.77 1.66 2.24 5.81 0.02 0.03 0.61 0.64 0.03 0.12 0.16 43.3 2,774 2,817 4.58 0.32 49.5 3,076
2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Mobile 3.23 2.09 13.1 30.7 0.15 0.20 3.80 4.00 0.19 0.77 0.96 —16,478 16,478 1.09 1.81 48.2 17,093
Area 2.13 7.97 0.10 12.0 < 0.005 0.02 —0.02 0.02 —0.02 —49.3 49.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 —50.7
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —2,175 2,175 0.21 0.03 —2,187
Water ———————————122 415 537 12.6 0.30 —941
Waste ———————————140 0.00 140 14.0 0.00 —488
Refrig.————————————————281 281
Total 5.36 10.1 13.2 42.6 0.15 0.21 3.80 4.02 0.21 0.77 0.98 262 19,117 19,379 27.8 2.14 329 21,041
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Mobile 3.13 1.99 13.8 26.1 0.15 0.20 3.80 4.00 0.19 0.77 0.96 —16,060 16,060 1.09 1.82 1.25 16,631
Area —6.00 ————————————————
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —2,175 2,175 0.21 0.03 —2,187
Water ———————————122 415 537 12.6 0.30 —941
Waste ———————————140 0.00 140 14.0 0.00 —488
Refrig.————————————————281 281
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
11 / 53
Total 3.13 7.99 13.8 26.1 0.15 0.20 3.80 4.00 0.19 0.77 0.96 262 18,650 18,911 27.8 2.15 282 20,528
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Mobile 2.74 1.74 12.2 23.6 0.13 0.17 3.34 3.51 0.16 0.68 0.84 —14,130 14,130 0.96 1.59 18.2 14,647
Area 1.46 7.35 0.07 8.21 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —33.8 33.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 —34.7
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —2,175 2,175 0.21 0.03 —2,187
Water ———————————122 415 537 12.6 0.30 —941
Waste ———————————140 0.00 140 14.0 0.00 —488
Refrig.————————————————281 281
Total 4.20 9.09 12.3 31.8 0.13 0.18 3.34 3.52 0.18 0.68 0.86 262 16,753 17,015 27.7 1.92 299 18,579
Annual ——————————————————
Mobile 0.50 0.32 2.22 4.31 0.02 0.03 0.61 0.64 0.03 0.12 0.15 —2,339 2,339 0.16 0.26 3.02 2,425
Area 0.27 1.34 0.01 1.50 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —5.59 5.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 —5.75
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —360 360 0.03 < 0.005 —362
Water ———————————20.2 68.6 88.8 2.08 0.05 —156
Waste ———————————23.1 0.00 23.1 2.31 0.00 —80.9
Refrig.————————————————46.5 46.5
Total 0.77 1.66 2.24 5.81 0.02 0.03 0.61 0.64 0.03 0.12 0.16 43.3 2,774 2,817 4.58 0.32 49.5 3,076
3. Construction Emissions Details
3.1. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Onsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
12 / 53
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.41 0.41 11.9 18.2 0.03 0.20 —0.20 0.19 —0.19 —3,425 3,425 0.14 0.03 —3,437
Demolitio
n
——————0.26 0.26 —0.04 0.04 ———————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.03 0.03 0.98 1.49 < 0.005 0.02 —0.02 0.02 —0.02 —282 282 0.01 < 0.005 —282
Demolitio
n
——————0.02 0.02 —< 0.005 < 0.005 ———————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.01 0.01 0.18 0.27 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —46.6 46.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 —46.8
Demolitio
n
——————< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 ———————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.09 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 —198 198 0.01 0.01 0.02 200
Vendor 0.02 < 0.005 0.22 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 —188 188 0.01 0.03 0.01 197
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
13 / 53
Hauling 0.03 < 0.005 0.27 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 —209 209 0.02 0.03 0.01 220
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —16.5 16.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 16.7
Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —15.5 15.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 16.2
Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —17.2 17.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 18.1
Annual ——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —2.73 2.73 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 2.77
Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —2.56 2.56 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.68
Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —2.84 2.84 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.99
3.3. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Onsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.64 0.64 14.7 28.3 0.05 0.10 —0.10 0.10 —0.10 —5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 —5,314
Dust
From
Material
Movement
——————5.66 5.66 —2.69 2.69 ———————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
——————————————————
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
14 / 53
Off-Road
Equipment
0.01 0.01 0.20 0.39 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —72.5 72.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 —72.8
Dust
From
Material
Movement
——————0.08 0.08 —0.04 0.04 ———————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —12.0 12.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 —12.1
Dust
From
Material
Movement
——————0.01 0.01 —0.01 0.01 ———————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.10 0.09 0.10 1.12 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 —231 231 0.01 0.01 0.03 234
Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —31.4 31.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 32.8
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —3.21 3.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.25
Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.43 0.43 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.45
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
15 / 53
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.53 0.53 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.54
Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.07 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.5. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Onsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.80 0.80 19.4 35.3 0.06 0.18 —0.18 0.18 —0.18 —6,599 6,599 0.27 0.05 —6,622
Dust
From
Material
Movement
——————2.67 2.67 —0.98 0.98 ———————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.05 0.05 1.33 2.42 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —452 452 0.02 < 0.005 —454
Dust
From
Material
Movement
——————0.18 0.18 —0.07 0.07 ———————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
16 / 53
Off-Road
Equipment
0.01 0.01 0.24 0.44 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —74.8 74.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 —75.1
Dust
From
Material
Movement
——————0.03 0.03 —0.01 0.01 ———————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.10 0.09 0.10 1.17 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 —258 258 0.01 0.01 0.03 262
Vendor 0.02 < 0.005 0.18 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.05 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 —154 154 0.01 0.02 0.01 162
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —17.9 17.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 18.2
Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —10.6 10.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 11.1
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —2.97 2.97 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.01
Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —1.75 1.75 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.83
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.7. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
17 / 53
Onsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.35 0.35 9.48 15.7 0.03 0.09 —0.09 0.09 —0.09 —2,630 2,630 0.11 0.02 —2,639
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.35 0.35 9.48 15.7 0.03 0.09 —0.09 0.09 —0.09 —2,630 2,630 0.11 0.02 —2,639
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.16 0.16 4.42 7.30 0.01 0.04 —0.04 0.04 —0.04 —1,225 1,225 0.05 0.01 —1,229
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.03 0.03 0.81 1.33 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —203 203 0.01 < 0.005 —204
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.59 0.53 0.51 9.01 0.00 0.00 1.51 1.51 0.00 0.35 0.35 —1,631 1,631 0.07 0.06 6.05 1,656
Vendor 0.10 0.03 1.13 0.61 0.01 0.01 0.28 0.30 0.01 0.08 0.09 —1,018 1,018 0.08 0.15 2.87 1,069
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
18 / 53
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.55 0.50 0.56 6.79 0.00 0.00 1.51 1.51 0.00 0.35 0.35 —1,495 1,495 0.07 0.06 0.16 1,514
Vendor 0.10 0.03 1.18 0.61 0.01 0.01 0.28 0.30 0.01 0.08 0.09 —1,019 1,019 0.08 0.15 0.07 1,067
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker 0.26 0.23 0.28 3.34 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.70 0.00 0.16 0.16 —706 706 0.03 0.03 1.22 716
Vendor 0.05 0.01 0.55 0.28 < 0.005 0.01 0.13 0.14 0.01 0.04 0.04 —474 474 0.04 0.07 0.58 497
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.05 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.03 0.03 —117 117 0.01 < 0.005 0.20 119
Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.10 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 —78.5 78.5 0.01 0.01 0.10 82.3
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.9. Paving (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Onsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.23 0.23 7.21 10.6 0.01 0.09 —0.09 0.08 —0.08 —1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 —1,517
Paving —0.31 ————————————————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
19 / 53
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Off-Road
Equipment
0.23 0.23 7.21 10.6 0.01 0.09 —0.09 0.08 —0.08 —1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 —1,517
Paving —0.31 ————————————————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.01 0.01 0.30 0.44 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —62.1 62.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 —62.3
Paving —0.01 ————————————————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —10.3 10.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 —10.3
Paving —< 0.005 ————————————————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.07 1.17 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 —211 211 0.01 0.01 0.78 215
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 —194 194 0.01 0.01 0.02 196
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
20 / 53
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —8.08 8.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 8.19
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —1.34 1.34 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.36
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.11. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Onsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.03 0.03 1.43 1.28 < 0.005 0.04 —0.04 0.04 —0.04 —178 178 0.01 < 0.005 —179
Architect
ural
Coatings
—15.7 ————————————————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.03 0.03 1.43 1.28 < 0.005 0.04 —0.04 0.04 —0.04 —178 178 0.01 < 0.005 —179
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
21 / 53
Architect
Coatings
—15.7 ————————————————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —9.76 9.76 < 0.005 < 0.005 —9.79
Architect
ural
Coatings
—0.86 ————————————————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —1.62 1.62 < 0.005 < 0.005 —1.62
Architect
ural
Coatings
—0.16 ————————————————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.12 0.11 0.10 1.80 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.07 0.07 —326 326 0.01 0.01 1.21 331
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.11 0.10 0.11 1.36 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.07 0.07 —299 299 0.01 0.01 0.03 303
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
22 / 53
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —16.6 16.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 16.9
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —2.75 2.75 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.79
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4. Operations Emissions Details
4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use
4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
0.33 0.30 0.19 3.89 0.01 < 0.005 0.32 0.33 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 —872 872 0.03 0.02 2.85 881
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
1.68 1.53 0.94 19.8 0.04 0.02 1.65 1.67 0.02 0.28 0.30 —4,427 4,427 0.14 0.10 14.5 4,474
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
23 / 53
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
1.22 0.27 12.0 7.01 0.10 0.17 1.83 2.01 0.17 0.44 0.60 —11,180 11,180 0.92 1.69 30.8 11,738
Total 3.23 2.09 13.1 30.7 0.15 0.20 3.80 4.00 0.19 0.77 0.96 —16,478 16,478 1.09 1.81 48.2 17,093
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
0.32 0.29 0.21 3.14 0.01 < 0.005 0.32 0.33 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 —802 802 0.03 0.02 0.07 809
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
1.60 1.45 1.05 15.9 0.04 0.02 1.65 1.67 0.02 0.28 0.30 —4,075 4,075 0.14 0.11 0.38 4,111
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
1.21 0.26 12.5 7.02 0.10 0.18 1.83 2.01 0.17 0.44 0.60 —11,183 11,183 0.92 1.69 0.80 11,711
Total 3.13 1.99 13.8 26.1 0.15 0.20 3.80 4.00 0.19 0.77 0.96 —16,060 16,060 1.09 1.82 1.25 16,631
Annual ——————————————————
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
24 / 53
1190.18< 0.005< 0.005118118—0.010.01< 0.0050.050.05< 0.005< 0.0050.520.030.050.05Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
0.26 0.23 0.17 2.67 0.01 < 0.005 0.26 0.27 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 —601 601 0.02 0.02 0.91 607
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
0.19 0.04 2.02 1.12 0.02 0.03 0.29 0.32 0.03 0.07 0.10 —1,620 1,620 0.13 0.25 1.93 1,698
Total 0.50 0.32 2.22 4.31 0.02 0.03 0.61 0.64 0.03 0.12 0.15 —2,339 2,339 0.16 0.26 3.02 2,425
4.2. Energy
4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
————————————1,145 1,145 0.11 0.01 —1,151
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
25 / 53
971—0.010.09966966————————————Unrefrige
rated
Parking
Lot
————————————64.5 64.5 0.01 < 0.005 —64.9
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
————————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
————————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ————————————2,175 2,175 0.21 0.03 —2,187
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
————————————1,145 1,145 0.11 0.01 —1,151
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
————————————966 966 0.09 0.01 —971
Parking
Lot
————————————64.5 64.5 0.01 < 0.005 —64.9
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
————————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
————————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ————————————2,175 2,175 0.21 0.03 —2,187
Annual ——————————————————
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
26 / 53
191—< 0.0050.02189189————————————Refrigera
ted
Warehou
Rail
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
————————————160 160 0.02 < 0.005 —161
Parking
Lot
————————————10.7 10.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 —10.7
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
————————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
————————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ————————————360 360 0.03 < 0.005 —362
4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
27 / 53
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Annual ——————————————————
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
28 / 53
0.00—0.000.000.000.00—0.00—0.000.00—0.000.000.000.000.000.00Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
4.3. Area Emissions by Source
4.3.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Consum
er
Products
—5.91 ————————————————
Architect
ural
Coatings
—0.09 ————————————————
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
29 / 53
50.7—< 0.005< 0.00549.349.3—0.02—0.020.02—0.02< 0.00512.00.101.972.13Landsca
pe
Total 2.13 7.97 0.10 12.0 < 0.005 0.02 —0.02 0.02 —0.02 —49.3 49.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 —50.7
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Consum
er
Products
—5.91 ————————————————
Architect
ural
Coatings
—0.09 ————————————————
Total —6.00 ————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Consum
er
Products
—1.08 ————————————————
Architect
ural
Coatings
—0.02 ————————————————
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt
0.27 0.25 0.01 1.50 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —5.59 5.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 —5.75
Total 0.27 1.34 0.01 1.50 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —5.59 5.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 —5.75
4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use
4.4.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
30 / 53
——————————————————Daily,
Summer
(Max)
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
———————————24.4 85.4 110 2.51 0.06 —191
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
———————————97.7 329 427 10.0 0.24 —750
Parking
Lot
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ———————————122 415 537 12.6 0.30 —941
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
———————————24.4 85.4 110 2.51 0.06 —191
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
———————————97.7 329 427 10.0 0.24 —750
Parking
Lot
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
31 / 53
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ———————————122 415 537 12.6 0.30 —941
Annual ——————————————————
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
———————————4.04 14.1 18.2 0.42 0.01 —31.6
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
———————————16.2 54.5 70.7 1.66 0.04 —124
Parking
Lot
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ———————————20.2 68.6 88.8 2.08 0.05 —156
4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use
4.5.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
32 / 53
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
———————————27.9 0.00 27.9 2.79 0.00 —97.7
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
———————————112 0.00 112 11.2 0.00 —391
Parking
Lot
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ———————————140 0.00 140 14.0 0.00 —488
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
———————————27.9 0.00 27.9 2.79 0.00 —97.7
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
———————————112 0.00 112 11.2 0.00 —391
Parking
Lot
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
33 / 53
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ———————————140 0.00 140 14.0 0.00 —488
Annual ——————————————————
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
———————————4.62 0.00 4.62 0.46 0.00 —16.2
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
———————————18.5 0.00 18.5 1.85 0.00 —64.7
Parking
Lot
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ———————————23.1 0.00 23.1 2.31 0.00 —80.9
4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use
4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
34 / 53
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
————————————————56.2 56.2
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
————————————————225 225
Total ————————————————281 281
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
————————————————56.2 56.2
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
————————————————225 225
Total ————————————————281 281
Annual ——————————————————
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
————————————————9.30 9.30
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
35 / 53
37.237.2————————————————Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
Total ————————————————46.5 46.5
4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type
4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type
4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
36 / 53
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type
4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
37 / 53
4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Vegetatio
n
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
38 / 53
4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Avoided ——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Remove
d
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
———————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Avoided ——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Remove
d
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
———————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Avoided ——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
39 / 53
Sequest ——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Remove
d
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
———————————————————
5. Activity Data
5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description
Demolition Demolition 11/1/2024 12/12/2024 5.00 30.0 20
Site Preparation Site Preparation 12/13/2024 12/19/2024 5.00 5.00 10
Grading Grading 1/28/2025 3/3/2025 5.00 25.0 30
Building Construction Building Construction 3/3/2025 10/24/2025 5.00 170 300
Paving Paving 9/22/2025 10/10/2025 5.00 15.0 20
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 9/15/2025 10/10/2025 5.00 20.0 20
5.2. Off-Road Equipment
5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor
Demolition Concrete/Industrial
Saws
Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73
Demolition Excavators Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 367 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 8.00 367 0.40
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
40 / 53
Site Preparation Crawler Tractors Diesel Tier 4 Interim 4.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Excavators Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Grading Graders Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 148 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 367 0.40
Grading Scrapers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 423 0.48
Grading Crawler Tractors Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Cranes Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 367 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 8.00 82.0 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Welders Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 46.0 0.45
Paving Pavers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 89.0 0.36
Paving Rollers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 37.0 0.48
5.3. Construction Vehicles
5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix
Demolition ————
Demolition Worker 15.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Demolition Vendor 6.00 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Demolition Hauling 2.97 20.0 HHDT
Demolition Onsite truck ——HHDT
Site Preparation ————
Site Preparation Worker 17.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
41 / 53
Site Preparation Vendor 1.00 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck ——HHDT
Grading ————
Grading Worker 20.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor 5.00 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck ——HHDT
Building Construction ————
Building Construction Worker 116 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 33.0 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck ——HHDT
Paving ————
Paving Worker 15.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor —10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck ——HHDT
Architectural Coating ————
Architectural Coating Worker 23.1 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor —10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck ——HHDT
5.4. Vehicles
5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
42 / 53
5.5. Architectural Coatings
Phase Name Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 413,340 137,780 12,739
5.6. Dust Mitigation
5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (cy)Material Exported (cy)Acres Graded (acres)Material Demolished (Building
Square Footage)
Acres Paved (acres)
Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,665 —
Site Preparation ——17.5 0.00 —
Grading ——100 0.00 —
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.87
5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied Frequency (per day)PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction
Water Exposed Area 3 74%74%
5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres)% Asphalt
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.00 0%
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.00 0%
Parking Lot 1.78 100%
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 3.09 0%
User Defined Industrial 0.00 0%
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
43 / 53
5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors
kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O
2024 0.00 349 0.03 < 0.005
2025 0.00 349 0.03 < 0.005
5.9. Operational Mobile Sources
5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
76.0 44.6 42.8 24,372 1,218 714 686 390,476
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
386 220 226 123,902 6,184 3,528 3,620 1,985,116
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
User Defined
Industrial
130 74.7 71.7 41,544 3,928 2,256 2,164 1,254,632
5.10. Operational Area Sources
5.10.1. Hearths
5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft)Non-Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
44 / 53
0 0.00 413,340 137,780 12,739
5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 250
5.11. Operational Energy Consumption
5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr)
Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr)CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr)
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 1,206,701 346 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail
1,018,184 346 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Parking Lot 67,999 346 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 346 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
User Defined Industrial 0.00 346 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption
5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year)Outdoor Water (gal/year)
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 12,744,650 610,568
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 50,978,600 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
45 / 53
User Defined Industrial 0.00 0.00
5.13. Operational Waste Generation
5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year)Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 51.8 0.00
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 207 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00
User Defined Industrial 0.00 0.00
5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment
5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg)Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
Cold storage User Defined 150 7.50 7.50 7.50 25.0
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
Cold storage User Defined 150 7.50 7.50 7.50 25.0
5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor
5.16. Stationary Sources
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
46 / 53
5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor
5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr)Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day)Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)
5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type
——
5.18. Vegetation
5.18.1. Land Use Change
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres
5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres
5.18.2. Sequestration
5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year)Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
47 / 53
6. Climate Risk Detailed Report
6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG
emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.
Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 21.7 annual days of extreme heat
Extreme Precipitation 5.25 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm
Sea Level Rise 0.00 meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 0.00 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed
historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full
day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider different
increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four simulations make
different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature
possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 50 meters (m) by 50 m, or about 164 feet (ft) by 164 ft.
Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate,
vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make
different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature
possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score
Temperature and Extreme Heat 2 0 0 N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
48 / 53
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest
exposure.
The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the
greatest ability to adapt.
The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.
6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score
Temperature and Extreme Heat 2 1 1 3
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2
Wildfire 1 1 1 2
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest
exposure.
The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the
greatest ability to adapt.
The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.
6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
7. Health and Equity Details
7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.
Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
49 / 53
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 95.3
AQ-PM 93.5
AQ-DPM 89.8
Drinking Water 66.7
Lead Risk Housing 48.2
Pesticides 0.00
Toxic Releases 75.3
Traffic 70.0
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 86.3
Groundwater 30.9
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 97.5
Impaired Water Bodies 0.00
Solid Waste 95.4
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 72.1
Cardio-vascular 85.8
Low Birth Weights 31.5
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 79.1
Housing 48.1
Linguistic 73.7
Poverty 73.3
Unemployment 85.8
7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
50 / 53
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.
Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 19.81265238
Employed 14.93648146
Median HI 31.91325549
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 4.824842808
High school enrollment 17.87501604
Preschool enrollment 64.42961632
Transportation —
Auto Access 92.6344155
Active commuting 46.54176825
Social —
2-parent households 66.99602207
Voting 15.74489927
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 51.89272424
Park access 21.5193122
Retail density 38.36776594
Supermarket access 40.97266778
Tree canopy 5.51777236
Housing —
Homeownership 52.16219684
Housing habitability 24.6888233
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 17.34890286
Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 82.47144874
Uncrowded housing 10.95855255
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
51 / 53
Health Outcomes —
Insured adults 8.392146798
Arthritis 41.4
Asthma ER Admissions 18.4
High Blood Pressure 53.6
Cancer (excluding skin)68.9
Asthma 21.6
Coronary Heart Disease 40.3
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 27.0
Diagnosed Diabetes 27.5
Life Expectancy at Birth 23.5
Cognitively Disabled 24.2
Physically Disabled 50.9
Heart Attack ER Admissions 7.0
Mental Health Not Good 19.7
Chronic Kidney Disease 27.1
Obesity 22.5
Pedestrian Injuries 90.7
Physical Health Not Good 21.1
Stroke 34.3
Health Risk Behaviors —
Binge Drinking 50.7
Current Smoker 20.8
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 23.4
Climate Change Exposures —
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
52 / 53
Children 39.2
Elderly 91.2
English Speaking 19.9
Foreign-born 77.9
Outdoor Workers 50.5
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 77.1
Traffic Density 71.4
Traffic Access 46.8
Other Indices —
Hardship 86.0
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 29.4
7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a)93.0
Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b)19.0
Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535)Yes
Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550)Yes
Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617)No
a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.
b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.
7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.
7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
15256 - 9813 Almond Ave Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
53 / 53
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.
7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.
8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Construction: Construction Phases Taken from client provided data
Construction: Off-Road Equipment T/L/B replaced with Crawler Tractor to accurately calculate disturbance for Site Preparation and
Grading phases
Standard 8 hours work days
Tier 4 Interim used per City of Fontana Ordinance
Construction: Trips and VMT Vendor Trips adjusted based on CalEEMod defaults for Building Construction and number of days for
Demolition, Site Preparation, Grading, and Building Construction
Construction: Architectural Coatings Per City of Fontana Ordinance:
Use of super-compliant VOC architectural and industrial maintenance coatings (e.g., paints) shall be
required.
Operations: Vehicle Data Trip characteristics based on information provided in the Traffic Analysis
Operations: Fleet Mix Passenger Car Mix estimated based on CalEEMod default fleet mix and the ratio of the vehicle
classes (LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV, MCY)
Truck Fleet Mix based on 2, 3 and 4 axle trucks
Operations: Architectural Coatings Per City of Fontana Ordinance:
Use of super-compliant VOC architectural and industrial maintenance coatings (e.g., paints) shall be
required.
Operations: Refrigerants As of 1 January 2022, new commercial refrigeration equipment may not use refrigerants with a GWP
of 150 or greater. Further, R-404A (the CalEEMod default) is unacceptable for new supermarket and
cold storage systems as of 1 January 2019 and 2023, respectively.
Operations: Energy Use No Natural Gas will be utilized based on Project applicant information
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
This page intentionally left blank
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
APPENDIX 4.2:
CALEEMOD EXISTING PROJECT EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS
15265 Almond Ave. (Existing) Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
1 / 29
15265 Almond Ave. (Existing) Detailed Report
Table of Contents
1. Basic Project Information
1.1. Basic Project Information
1.2. Land Use Types
1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector
2. Emissions Summary
2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
4. Operations Emissions Details
4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use
4.1.1. Unmitigated
4.2. Energy
4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
4.3. Area Emissions by Source
15265 Almond Ave. (Existing) Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
2 / 29
4.3.2. Unmitigated
4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use
4.4.2. Unmitigated
4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use
4.5.2. Unmitigated
4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use
4.6.1. Unmitigated
4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type
4.7.1. Unmitigated
4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type
4.8.1. Unmitigated
4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type
4.9.1. Unmitigated
4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated
4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated
4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated
15265 Almond Ave. (Existing) Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
3 / 29
5. Activity Data
5.9. Operational Mobile Sources
5.9.1. Unmitigated
5.10. Operational Area Sources
5.10.1. Hearths
5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
5.11. Operational Energy Consumption
5.11.1. Unmitigated
5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption
5.12.1. Unmitigated
5.13. Operational Waste Generation
5.13.1. Unmitigated
5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment
5.14.1. Unmitigated
5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
15265 Almond Ave. (Existing) Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
4 / 29
5.15.1. Unmitigated
5.16. Stationary Sources
5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
5.16.2. Process Boilers
5.17. User Defined
5.18. Vegetation
5.18.1. Land Use Change
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
5.18.2. Sequestration
5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
6. Climate Risk Detailed Report
6.1. Climate Risk Summary
6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
15265 Almond Ave. (Existing) Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
5 / 29
7. Health and Equity Details
7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
7.4. Health & Equity Measures
7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
8. User Changes to Default Data
15265 Almond Ave. (Existing) Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
6 / 29
1. Basic Project Information
1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name 15265 Almond Ave. (Existing)
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s)2.80
Precipitation (days)6.40
Location 9813 Almond Ave, Fontana, CA 92335, USA
County San Bernardino-South Coast
City Fontana
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5286
EDFZ 10
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft)Landscape Area (sq
ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Parking Lot 1.00 1000sqft 0.00 0.00 0.00 ———
User Defined Parking 1.00 User Defined Unit 0.00 0.00 0.00 ———
15265 Almond Ave. (Existing) Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
7 / 29
1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector
No measures selected
2. Emissions Summary
2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Un/Mit.TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.3.64 1.18 29.6 24.6 0.26 0.38 4.42 4.81 0.37 1.00 1.37 0.00 28,499 28,499 2.39 4.15 73.6 29,870
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.3.58 1.12 31.0 22.8 0.26 0.38 4.42 4.81 0.37 1.00 1.37 0.00 28,356 28,356 2.39 4.16 1.91 29,656
Average
Daily
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.2.56 0.81 22.4 16.5 0.18 0.27 3.16 3.44 0.26 0.71 0.98 0.00 20,272 20,272 1.71 2.97 22.7 21,222
Annual
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.0.47 0.15 4.08 3.01 0.03 0.05 0.58 0.63 0.05 0.13 0.18 0.00 3,356 3,356 0.28 0.49 3.76 3,514
2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
15265 Almond Ave. (Existing) Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
8 / 29
Mobile 3.64 1.18 29.6 24.6 0.26 0.38 4.42 4.81 0.37 1.00 1.37 —28,499 28,499 2.39 4.15 73.6 29,870
Area 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Water ———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Waste ———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total 3.64 1.18 29.6 24.6 0.26 0.38 4.42 4.81 0.37 1.00 1.37 0.00 28,499 28,499 2.39 4.15 73.6 29,870
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Mobile 3.58 1.12 31.0 22.8 0.26 0.38 4.42 4.81 0.37 1.00 1.37 —28,356 28,356 2.39 4.16 1.91 29,656
Area —0.00 ————————————————
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Water ———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Waste ———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total 3.58 1.12 31.0 22.8 0.26 0.38 4.42 4.81 0.37 1.00 1.37 0.00 28,356 28,356 2.39 4.16 1.91 29,656
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Mobile 2.56 0.81 22.4 16.5 0.18 0.27 3.16 3.44 0.26 0.71 0.98 —20,272 20,272 1.71 2.97 22.7 21,222
Area 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Water ———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Waste ———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total 2.56 0.81 22.4 16.5 0.18 0.27 3.16 3.44 0.26 0.71 0.98 0.00 20,272 20,272 1.71 2.97 22.7 21,222
Annual ——————————————————
Mobile 0.47 0.15 4.08 3.01 0.03 0.05 0.58 0.63 0.05 0.13 0.18 —3,356 3,356 0.28 0.49 3.76 3,514
Area 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Water ———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Waste ———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
15265 Almond Ave. (Existing) Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
9 / 29
Total 0.47 0.15 4.08 3.01 0.03 0.05 0.58 0.63 0.05 0.13 0.18 0.00 3,356 3,356 0.28 0.49 3.76 3,514
4. Operations Emissions Details
4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use
4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Parking
Lot
0.76 0.69 0.48 9.34 0.02 0.01 0.64 0.65 0.01 0.11 0.12 —1,845 1,845 0.06 0.05 7.92 1,868
User
Defined
Parking
2.87 0.49 29.1 15.2 0.24 0.38 3.78 4.16 0.36 0.89 1.25 —26,654 26,654 2.32 4.11 65.7 28,002
Total 3.64 1.18 29.6 24.6 0.26 0.38 4.42 4.81 0.37 1.00 1.37 —28,499 28,499 2.39 4.15 73.6 29,870
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Parking
Lot
0.73 0.65 0.54 7.50 0.02 0.01 0.64 0.65 0.01 0.11 0.12 —1,697 1,697 0.07 0.05 0.21 1,714
User
Defined
Parking
2.85 0.47 30.4 15.3 0.24 0.38 3.78 4.16 0.36 0.89 1.25 —26,659 26,659 2.32 4.11 1.70 27,943
Total 3.58 1.12 31.0 22.8 0.26 0.38 4.42 4.81 0.37 1.00 1.37 —28,356 28,356 2.39 4.16 1.91 29,656
Annual ——————————————————
Parking
Lot
0.09 0.08 0.07 1.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 —204 204 0.01 0.01 0.40 206
15265 Almond Ave. (Existing) Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
10 / 29
3,3083.350.490.273,1533,153—0.160.120.050.540.490.050.031.984.010.060.37User
Defined
Parking
Total 0.47 0.15 4.08 3.01 0.03 0.05 0.58 0.63 0.05 0.13 0.18 —3,356 3,356 0.28 0.49 3.76 3,514
4.2. Energy
4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Parking
Lot
————————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
User
Defined
Parking
————————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ————————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Parking
Lot
————————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
User
Defined
Parking
————————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ————————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Parking
Lot
————————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
15265 Almond Ave. (Existing) Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
11 / 29
0.00—0.000.000.000.00————————————User
Defined
Parking
Total ————————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
User
Defined
Parking
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
User
Defined
Parking
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
User
Defined
Parking
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
15265 Almond Ave. (Existing) Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
12 / 29
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
4.3. Area Emissions by Source
4.3.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Consum
er
Products
—0.00 ————————————————
Architect
ural
Coatings
—0.00 ————————————————
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Consum
er
Products
—0.00 ————————————————
Architect
ural
Coatings
—0.00 ————————————————
Total —0.00 ————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
15265 Almond Ave. (Existing) Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
13 / 29
————————————————0.00—Consum
er
Architect
ural
Coatings
—0.00 ————————————————
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use
4.4.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Parking
Lot
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
User
Defined
Parking
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Parking
Lot
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
User
Defined
Parking
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
15265 Almond Ave. (Existing) Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
14 / 29
Total ———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Parking
Lot
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
User
Defined
Parking
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use
4.5.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Parking
Lot
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
User
Defined
Parking
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Parking
Lot
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
User
Defined
Parking
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
15265 Almond Ave. (Existing) Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
15 / 29
Annual ——————————————————
Parking
Lot
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
User
Defined
Parking
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use
4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type
4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
15265 Almond Ave. (Existing) Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
16 / 29
CO2eRN2OCH4CO2TNBCO2BCO2PM2.5TPM2.5DPM2.5EPM10TPM10DPM10ESO2CONOxROGTOGEquipme
nt
Type
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type
4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
15265 Almond Ave. (Existing) Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
17 / 29
4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type
4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Vegetatio
n
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
15265 Almond Ave. (Existing) Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
18 / 29
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Avoided ——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
15265 Almond Ave. (Existing) Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
19 / 29
Remove ——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
———————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Avoided ——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Remove
d
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
———————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Avoided ——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Remove
d
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
———————————————————
5. Activity Data
5.9. Operational Mobile Sources
15265 Almond Ave. (Existing) Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
20 / 29
5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year
Parking Lot 150 0.55 0.02 39,137 2,403 8.81 0.35 627,038
User Defined Parking 261 0.10 0.04 68,053 8,339 3.04 1.21 2,174,305
5.10. Operational Area Sources
5.10.1. Hearths
5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft)Non-Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
0 0.00 0.00 0.00 —
5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 250
5.11. Operational Energy Consumption
5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr)
Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr)CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr)
Parking Lot 0.00 349 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
15265 Almond Ave. (Existing) Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
21 / 29
User Defined Parking 0.00 349 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption
5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year)Outdoor Water (gal/year)
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00
User Defined Parking 0.00 0.00
5.13. Operational Waste Generation
5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year)Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00
User Defined Parking 0.00 0.00
5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment
5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg)Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced
5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor
15265 Almond Ave. (Existing) Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
22 / 29
5.16. Stationary Sources
5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor
5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr)Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day)Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)
5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type
——
5.18. Vegetation
5.18.1. Land Use Change
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres
5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres
5.18.2. Sequestration
15265 Almond Ave. (Existing) Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
23 / 29
5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year)Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)
6. Climate Risk Detailed Report
6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG
emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.
Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 21.7 annual days of extreme heat
Extreme Precipitation 5.25 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm
Sea Level Rise 0.00 meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 0.00 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed
historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full
day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider different
increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four simulations make
different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature
possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 50 meters (m) by 50 m, or about 164 feet (ft) by 164 ft.
Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate,
vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make
different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature
possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score
Temperature and Extreme Heat 2 0 0 N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
15265 Almond Ave. (Existing) Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
24 / 29
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest
exposure.
The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the
greatest ability to adapt.
The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.
6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score
Temperature and Extreme Heat 2 1 1 3
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2
Wildfire 1 1 1 2
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest
exposure.
The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the
greatest ability to adapt.
The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.
6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
7. Health and Equity Details
15265 Almond Ave. (Existing) Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
25 / 29
7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.
Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 95.3
AQ-PM 93.5
AQ-DPM 89.8
Drinking Water 66.7
Lead Risk Housing 48.2
Pesticides 0.00
Toxic Releases 75.3
Traffic 70.0
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 86.3
Groundwater 30.9
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 97.5
Impaired Water Bodies 0.00
Solid Waste 95.4
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 72.1
Cardio-vascular 85.8
Low Birth Weights 31.5
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 79.1
Housing 48.1
Linguistic 73.7
Poverty 73.3
15265 Almond Ave. (Existing) Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
26 / 29
Unemployment 85.8
7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.
Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 19.81265238
Employed 14.93648146
Median HI 31.91325549
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 4.824842808
High school enrollment 17.87501604
Preschool enrollment 64.42961632
Transportation —
Auto Access 92.6344155
Active commuting 46.54176825
Social —
2-parent households 66.99602207
Voting 15.74489927
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 51.89272424
Park access 21.5193122
Retail density 38.36776594
Supermarket access 40.97266778
Tree canopy 5.51777236
Housing —
Homeownership 52.16219684
15265 Almond Ave. (Existing) Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
27 / 29
Housing habitability 24.6888233
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 17.34890286
Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 82.47144874
Uncrowded housing 10.95855255
Health Outcomes —
Insured adults 8.392146798
Arthritis 41.4
Asthma ER Admissions 18.4
High Blood Pressure 53.6
Cancer (excluding skin)68.9
Asthma 21.6
Coronary Heart Disease 40.3
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 27.0
Diagnosed Diabetes 27.5
Life Expectancy at Birth 23.5
Cognitively Disabled 24.2
Physically Disabled 50.9
Heart Attack ER Admissions 7.0
Mental Health Not Good 19.7
Chronic Kidney Disease 27.1
Obesity 22.5
Pedestrian Injuries 90.7
Physical Health Not Good 21.1
Stroke 34.3
Health Risk Behaviors —
Binge Drinking 50.7
Current Smoker 20.8
15265 Almond Ave. (Existing) Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
28 / 29
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 23.4
Climate Change Exposures —
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 39.2
Elderly 91.2
English Speaking 19.9
Foreign-born 77.9
Outdoor Workers 50.5
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 77.1
Traffic Density 71.4
Traffic Access 46.8
Other Indices —
Hardship 86.0
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 29.4
7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a)93.0
Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b)19.0
Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535)Yes
Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550)Yes
Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617)No
a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.
b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.
15265 Almond Ave. (Existing) Detailed Report, 3/20/2023
29 / 29
7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.
7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.
7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.
8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Traffic associated trips accounted for only
Operations: Vehicle Data Taken from Trip Generation Assessment
Operations: Fleet Mix Passenger Car Mix estimated based on CalEEMod default fleet mix and the ratio of the vehicle
classes (LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV, MCY). Truck Fleet Mix based on 2, 3 and 4 axle trucks
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
This page intentionally left blank
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
APPENDIX 4.3:
EMFAC 2021
Source: EMFAC2021 (v1.0.2) Emissions Inventory
Region Type: Sub-Area
Region: San Bernardino (SC)
Calendar Year: 2023
Season: Annual
Vehicle Classification: EMFAC2007 Categories
Units: miles/day for CVMT and EVMT, trips/day for Trips, kWh/day for Energy Consumption, tons/day for Emissions, 1000 gallons/day for Fuel Consumption
Region Calend Vehicle CateModel Year Speed Fuel Population Total VMT CVMT EVMT Trips Fuel Consumption Fuel_Consumption Total Fuel VMT Total VMT Miles per Gallon Vehicle Class
San Bernardino (SC)2023 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 7.139920774 223.2106421 223.21064 0 142.85553 0.06183047 61.8304705 317791.1215 223.2106421 1888049.604 5.94 HHDT
San Bernardino (SC)2023 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 13684.27912 1731847.924 1731847.9 0 205449.48 292.3325073 292332.5073 1731847.924
San Bernardino (SC)2023 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 11.071794 690.5331854 0 690.53319 166.56335 0 0 690.5331854
San Bernardino (SC)2023 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 2370.144029 155287.9364 155287.94 0 13597.571 25.39678372 25396.78372 155287.9364
San Bernardino (SC)2023 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 461483.7292 20223414.17 20223414 0 2148240.8 692.3245964 692324.5964 703217.7643 20223414.17 21577861.55 30.68 LDA
San Bernardino (SC)2023 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1109.597168 40502.09099 40502.091 0 4806.0121 0.947730081 947.7300814 40502.09099
San Bernardino (SC)2023 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 15706.1209 729284.3787 0 729284.38 79230.417 0 0 729284.3787
San Bernardino (SC)2023 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 11324.38067 584660.9102 297083.3 287577.61 46826.314 9.945437763 9945.437763 584660.9102
San Bernardino (SC)2023 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 41702.74967 1435035.032 1435035 0 180077.31 59.56936874 59569.36874 59603.2156 1435035.032 1438685.032 24.14 LDT1
San Bernardino (SC)2023 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 11.94633759 180.7506847 180.75068 0 34.828868 0.007425144 7.425143634 180.7506847
San Bernardino (SC)2023 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 40.25061846 1772.449638 0 1772.4496 198.98355 0 0 1772.449638
San Bernardino (SC)2023 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 32.95928492 1696.799492 782.58522 914.21427 136.28664 0.026421715 26.42171463 1696.799492
San Bernardino (SC)2023 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 187695.2776 7684041.942 7684041.9 0 878027.16 325.7245496 325724.5496 327412.4965 7684041.942 7798312.591 23.82 LDT2
San Bernardino (SC)2023 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 481.5963709 21452.95771 21452.958 0 2333.2487 0.659664085 659.664085 21452.95771
San Bernardino (SC)2023 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 809.1431596 29454.51408 0 29454.514 4156.1044 0 0 29454.51408
San Bernardino (SC)2023 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 1266.994818 63363.17755 30376.886 32986.291 5239.0236 1.028282788 1028.282788 63363.17755
San Bernardino (SC)2023 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 17369.10468 636669.4873 636669.49 0 258773.78 48.08913849 48089.13849 69265.91752 636669.4873 1070433.704 15.45 LHDT1
San Bernardino (SC)2023 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 11340.4221 433764.2167 433764.22 0 142648.24 21.17677903 21176.77903 433764.2167
San Bernardino (SC)2023 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2940.213764 104644.4628 104644.46 0 43804.804 8.847465361 8847.465361 19637.22878 104644.4628 288802.0099 14.71 LHDT2
San Bernardino (SC)2023 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4748.518724 184157.5472 184157.55 0 59730.392 10.78976342 10789.76342 184157.5472
San Bernardino (SC)2023 MCY Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 20689.98168 123448.5709 123448.57 0 41379.963 2.952535443 2952.535443 2952.535443 123448.5709 123448.5709 41.81 MDV
San Bernardino (SC)2023 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 147303.3129 5795658.803 5795658.8 0 673604.84 301.7951895 301795.1895 305825.909 5795658.803 5947370.317 19.45 MDV
San Bernardino (SC)2023 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1912.856517 78101.9574 78101.957 0 8902.0049 3.325595213 3325.595213 78101.9574
San Bernardino (SC)2023 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 883.4710394 32153.68244 0 32153.682 4537.6769 0 0 32153.68244
San Bernardino (SC)2023 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 823.221551 41455.87402 20652.044 20803.83 3404.0211 0.705124294 705.1242942 41455.87402
San Bernardino (SC)2023 MH Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 3595.119651 31990.03643 31990.036 0 359.65577 6.518197308 6518.197308 7709.885285 31990.03643 44195.40661 5.73 MHDT
San Bernardino (SC)2023 MH Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1340.055605 12205.37018 12205.37 0 134.00556 1.191687977 1191.687977 12205.37018
San Bernardino (SC)2023 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1500.364507 79642.61703 79642.617 0 30019.293 15.40897049 15408.97049 87900.59877 79642.61703 729331.6703 8.30 MHDT
San Bernardino (SC)2023 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 14608.25407 640403.2715 640403.27 0 178868.8 71.4372525 71437.2525 640403.2715
San Bernardino (SC)2023 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 9.224784632 203.8722795 0 203.87228 115.60671 0 0 203.8722795
San Bernardino (SC)2023 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 184.1702325 9081.909565 9081.9096 0 1714.9865 1.05437579 1054.37579 9081.909565
San Bernardino (SC)2023 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 384.9686335 16562.55757 16562.558 0 7702.4524 3.251674362 3251.674362 5514.43375 16562.55757 33644.16636 6.10 OBUS
San Bernardino (SC)2023 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 208.3404962 15154.83567 15154.836 0 2452.5212 2.045655905 2045.655905 15154.83567
San Bernardino (SC)2023 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 31.52138873 1926.773124 1926.7731 0 280.54036 0.217103483 217.1034832 1926.773124
San Bernardino (SC)2023 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 294.5939953 13805.92037 13805.92 0 1178.376 1.544513624 1544.513624 4926.826262 13805.92037 31599.12518 6.41 SBUS
San Bernardino (SC)2023 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 382.1050011 8002.390505 8002.3905 0 5532.8804 1.089878604 1089.878604 8002.390505
San Bernardino (SC)2023 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 0.69336851 8.065464225 0 8.0654642 10.039976 0 0 8.065464225
San Bernardino (SC)2023 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 385.616886 9782.748834 9782.7488 0 5583.7325 2.292434033 2292.434033 9782.748834
San Bernardino (SC)2023 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 54.60967225 5243.249002 5243.249 0 218.43869 0.429264999 429.2649994 8490.322036 5243.249002 40042.47057 4.72 UBUS
San Bernardino (SC)2023 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4.556959009 449.8374364 449.83744 0 18.227836 0.043172716 43.17271551 449.8374364
San Bernardino (SC)2023 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 0.433186591 43.12764189 0 43.127642 1.7327464 0 0 43.12764189
San Bernardino (SC)2023 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 249.7401785 34306.25649 34306.256 0 998.96071 8.017884321 8017.884321 34306.25649
Source: EMFAC2021 (v1.0.2) Emissions Inventory
Region Type: Sub-Area
Region: San Bernardino (SC)
Calendar Year: 2024
Season: Annual
Vehicle Classification: EMFAC2007 Categories
Units: miles/day for CVMT and EVMT, trips/day for Trips, kWh/day for Energy Consumption, tons/day for Emissions, 1000 gallons/day for Fuel Consumption
Region Calend Vehicle CateModel Year Speed Fuel Population Total VMT CVMT EVMT Trips Fuel Consumption Fuel_Consumption Total Fuel VMT Total VMT Miles per Gallon Vehicle Class
San Bernardino (SC)2024 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 5.565987525 200.7100937 200.71009 0 111.36428 0.053685222 53.68522156 320576.6084 200.7100937 1931561.832 6.03 HHDT
San Bernardino (SC)2024 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 14231.95658 1766161.303 1766161.3 0 214453.67 294.8811952 294881.1952 1766161.303
San Bernardino (SC)2024 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 48.62871821 4853.771805 0 4853.7718 623.97305 0 0 4853.771805
San Bernardino (SC)2024 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 2469.470738 160346.0479 160346.05 0 14202.532 25.64172796 25641.72796 160346.0479
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 459317.1397 20167734.04 20167734 0 2135709.6 678.0067332 678006.7332 689480.9135 20167734.04 21769357.53 31.57 LDA
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1047.589492 37687.90898 37687.909 0 4511.7504 0.878080701 878.0807006 37687.90898
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 19287.2826 922159.8322 0 922159.83 96956.803 0 0 922159.8322
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 12500.45848 641775.7563 318306.41 323469.34 51689.396 10.5960996 10596.0996 641775.7563
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 40725.35771 1412436.812 1412436.8 0 175939.19 57.61437754 57614.37754 57660.77698 1412436.812 1417994.863 24.59 LDT1
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 10.72175816 158.8104429 158.81044 0 30.705498 0.006542477 6.542476778 158.8104429
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 58.29951204 2744.162081 0 2744.1621 290.82143 0 0 2744.162081
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 51.79076029 2655.077851 1187.1583 1467.9196 214.15479 0.039856963 39.85696305 2655.077851
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 192654.7494 7946861.936 7946861.9 0 901952.79 328.2807397 328280.7397 330225.39 7946861.936 8092457.996 24.51 LDT2
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 520.896721 23279.78377 23279.784 0 2524.2962 0.7022627 702.2627003 23279.78377
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 1199.246991 43242.4945 0 43242.494 6132.301 0 0 43242.4945
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 1594.625518 79073.78143 36903.173 42170.609 6593.7765 1.24238757 1242.38757 79073.78143
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 17179.49082 637558.6823 637558.68 0 255948.82 46.93129933 46931.29933 68120.12603 637558.6823 1077239.622 15.81 LHDT1
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 11382.09786 435758.4326 435758.43 0 143172.47 21.1888267 21188.8267 435758.4326
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 52.7403112 3922.506902 0 3922.5069 736.74875 0 0 3922.506902
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2883.702401 102543.2335 102543.23 0 42962.869 8.523099836 8523.099836 19386.27641 102543.2335 290170.8153 14.97 LHDT2
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4825.532255 186665.6444 186665.64 0 60699.125 10.86317658 10863.17658 186665.6444
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 13.65084178 961.9374735 0 961.93747 180.6958 0 0 961.9374735
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MCY Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 20751.92893 123685.0541 123685.05 0 41503.858 2.946367925 2946.367925 2946.367925 123685.0541 123685.0541 41.98 MCY
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 147141.1277 5830683.861 5830683.9 0 672968.08 296.7902416 296790.2416 300889.4492 5830683.861 6007732.23 19.97 MDV
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1910.88318 77417.93798 77417.938 0 8850.7182 3.254905083 3254.905083 77417.93798
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 1327.48959 47850.30724 0 47850.307 6787.4169 0 0 47850.30724
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 1028.690257 51780.12453 24862.585 26917.54 4253.6342 0.844302537 844.3025368 51780.12453
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MH Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 3401.970527 30215.87901 30215.879 0 340.33313 6.184856876 6184.856876 7364.77817 30215.87901 42284.2868 5.74 MH
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MH Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1336.39751 12068.40778 12068.408 0 133.63975 1.179921294 1179.921294 12068.40778
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1460.602089 78395.7093 78395.709 0 29223.727 15.05623591 15056.23591 88813.34178 78395.7093 740808.1193 8.34 MHDT
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 14946.4736 650565.6856 650565.69 0 183244.35 72.65830331 72658.30331 650565.6856
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 46.13645649 2344.169726 0 2344.1697 591.81848 0 0 2344.169726
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 195.6757264 9502.554663 9502.5547 0 1810.4779 1.098802564 1098.802564 9502.554663
San Bernardino (SC)2024 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 370.0192137 15806.92249 15806.922 0 7403.3444 3.09514692 3095.14692 5378.066575 15806.92249 33062.62008 6.15 OBUS
San Bernardino (SC)2024 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 210.5519789 15196.96791 15196.968 0 2486.9523 2.055015596 2055.015596 15196.96791
San Bernardino (SC)2024 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 0.809761934 65.22582716 0 65.225827 16.201717 0 0 65.22582716
San Bernardino (SC)2024 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 32.78528924 1993.503854 1993.5039 0 291.78907 0.227904058 227.9040581 1993.503854
San Bernardino (SC)2024 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 297.8692006 14022.10243 14022.102 0 1191.4768 1.564009513 1564.009513 4951.794465 14022.10243 31836.21175 6.43 SBUS
San Bernardino (SC)2024 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 373.2941498 7747.295585 7747.2956 0 5405.2993 1.052431626 1052.431626 7747.295585
San Bernardino (SC)2024 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 2.213199982 56.32019914 0 56.320199 27.393271 0 0 56.32019914
San Bernardino (SC)2024 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 398.7600331 10010.49353 10010.494 0 5774.0453 2.335353326 2335.353326 10010.49353
San Bernardino (SC)2024 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 54.72012078 5253.853518 5253.8535 0 218.88048 0.406450205 406.450205 8263.421636 5253.853518 40123.45681 4.86 UBUS
San Bernardino (SC)2024 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4.556959009 449.8374364 449.83744 0 18.227836 0.043468777 43.46877693 449.8374364
San Bernardino (SC)2024 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 7.328344802 1111.359033 0 1111.359 29.313379 0 0 1111.359033
San Bernardino (SC)2024 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 243.3602145 33308.40682 33308.407 0 973.44086 7.813502654 7813.502654 33308.40682
Source: EMFAC2021 (v1.0.2) Emissions Inventory
Region Type: Sub-Area
Region: San Bernardino (SC)
Calendar Year: 2025
Season: Annual
Vehicle Classification: EMFAC2007 Categories
Units: miles/day for CVMT and EVMT, trips/day for Trips, kWh/day for Energy Consumption, tons/day for Emissions, 1000 gallons/day for Fuel Consumption
Region Calend Vehicle CateModel Year Speed Fuel Population Total VMT CVMT EVMT Trips Fuel Consumption Fuel_Consumption Total Fuel VMT Total VMT Miles per Gallon Vehicle Class
San Bernardino (SC)2025 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 3.869766832 177.2217014 177.2217 0 77.426295 0.044579975 44.57997511 322298.7048 177.2217014 1975659.248 6.13 HHDT
San Bernardino (SC)2025 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 14693.60242 1799109.244 1799109.2 0 221962.63 296.221758 296221.758 1799109.244
San Bernardino (SC)2025 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 109.5985203 11409.19414 0 11409.194 1368.4061 0 0 11409.19414
San Bernardino (SC)2025 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 2560.5176 164963.5875 164963.59 0 14771.258 26.0323668 26032.3668 164963.5875
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 457374.7047 20012363.19 20012363 0 2124445.4 659.2303928 659230.3928 671181.1368 20012363.19 21858504.21 32.57 LDA
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 986.5858319 34821.96021 34821.96 0 4226.2746 0.803361461 803.3614609 34821.96021
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 22921.29943 1119595.112 0 1119595.1 114790.15 0 0 1119595.112
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 13621.71468 691723.9558 334673.16 357050.8 56325.79 11.14738256 11147.38256 691723.9558
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 39862.49619 1386010.237 1386010.2 0 172343.79 55.44488475 55444.88475 55506.30461 1386010.237 1393998.156 25.11 LDT1
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 9.62153332 138.8700264 138.87003 0 27.066618 0.005712258 5.712257886 138.8700264
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 81.74409231 4029.090974 0 4029.091 409.6554 0 0 4029.090974
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 75.22656194 3819.958249 1658.4183 2161.5399 311.06183 0.055707597 55.70759743 3819.958249
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 197589.8024 8156000.659 8156000.7 0 925465.37 328.0141754 328014.1754 330196.8511 8156000.659 8333682.032 25.24 LDT2
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 559.2848358 24877.85405 24877.854 0 2707.6119 0.732985994 732.9859937 24877.85405
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 1637.444663 58171.59292 0 58171.593 8336.7293 0 0 58171.59292
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 1934.989022 94631.92591 43031.419 51600.507 8001.1796 1.449689627 1449.689627 94631.92591
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 16963.11371 633447.7463 633447.75 0 252725.12 45.45107153 45451.07153 66469.9942 633447.7463 1077884.454 16.22 LHDT1
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 11403.02981 434286.2222 434286.22 0 143435.77 21.01892267 21018.92267 434286.2222
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 147.3648902 10150.48537 0 10150.485 2061.8439 0 0 10150.48537
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2823.949841 99825.11713 99825.117 0 42072.645 8.149183621 8149.183621 18984.07565 99825.11713 289811.7154 15.27 LHDT2
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4888.887446 187525.0486 187525.05 0 61496.054 10.83489203 10834.89203 187525.0486
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 37.58571717 2461.549606 0 2461.5496 498.42255 0 0 2461.549606
San Bernardino (SC)2025 MCY Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 20826.96994 123280.6812 123280.68 0 41653.94 2.925130919 2925.130919 2925.130919 123280.6812 123280.6812 42.15 MCY
San Bernardino (SC)2025 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 147056.3511 5833561.643 5833561.6 0 672637.61 289.7409456 289740.9456 293881.6654 5833561.643 6036663.747 20.54 MDV
San Bernardino (SC)2025 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1906.902909 76374.47974 76374.48 0 8796.8854 3.151065928 3151.065928 76374.47974
San Bernardino (SC)2025 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 1802.834782 63969.43971 0 63969.44 9175.3562 0 0 63969.43971
San Bernardino (SC)2025 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 1256.812117 62758.18504 29119.494 33638.691 5196.9181 0.98965379 989.6537902 62758.18504
San Bernardino (SC)2025 MH Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 3227.585522 28520.15334 28520.153 0 322.88766 5.836852659 5836.852659 6997.412696 28520.15334 40386.16204 5.77 MH
San Bernardino (SC)2025 MH Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1329.243498 11866.0087 11866.009 0 132.92435 1.160560036 1160.560036 11866.0087
San Bernardino (SC)2025 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1427.423114 76828.767 76828.767 0 28559.882 14.58515666 14585.15666 88952.25214 76828.767 752323.1368 8.46 MHDT
San Bernardino (SC)2025 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 15347.54129 658670.5437 658670.54 0 188328.19 73.22420436 73224.20436 658670.5437
San Bernardino (SC)2025 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 133.1585562 6928.399641 0 6928.3996 1697.434 0 0 6928.399641
San Bernardino (SC)2025 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 208.419151 9895.426472 9895.4265 0 1924.3295 1.142891124 1142.891124 9895.426472
San Bernardino (SC)2025 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 358.2884481 15030.55432 15030.554 0 7168.6353 2.914537526 2914.537526 5188.582188 15030.55432 32494.86271 6.26 OBUS
San Bernardino (SC)2025 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 215.4704252 15216.87274 15216.873 0 2560.6679 2.039111404 2039.111404 15216.87274
San Bernardino (SC)2025 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 1.990200949 157.0570869 0 157.05709 39.819941 0 0 157.0570869
San Bernardino (SC)2025 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 34.88313202 2090.378559 2090.3786 0 310.45987 0.234933258 234.9332579 2090.378559
San Bernardino (SC)2025 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 300.4577721 14124.28621 14124.286 0 1201.8311 1.57111818 1571.11818 4959.876607 14124.28621 31963.06277 6.44 SBUS
San Bernardino (SC)2025 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 363.8707141 7488.892183 7488.8922 0 5268.8479 1.014599014 1014.599014 7488.892183
San Bernardino (SC)2025 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 4.690534617 132.2929048 0 132.2929 57.759401 0 0 132.2929048
San Bernardino (SC)2025 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 411.4766102 10217.59148 10217.591 0 5958.1813 2.374159413 2374.159413 10217.59148
San Bernardino (SC)2025 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 54.83056931 5264.458034 5264.458 0 219.32228 0.406547565 406.5475652 8275.384496 5264.458034 40204.44305 4.86 UBUS
San Bernardino (SC)2025 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4.529432466 447.4667714 447.46677 0 18.11773 0.043317656 43.31765633 447.4667714
San Bernardino (SC)2025 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 7.409987909 1124.502697 0 1124.5027 29.639952 0 0 1124.502697
San Bernardino (SC)2025 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 243.8212922 33368.01555 33368.016 0 975.28517 7.825519274 7825.519274 33368.01555
Almond & Valley Distribution Center Energy Analysis
15256-03 EA Report
This page intentionally left blank