HomeMy WebLinkAboutE - Energy Analysis
Beech Logistics Center
ENERGY ANALYSIS
CITY OF FONTANA
PREPARED BY:
Haseeb Qureshi
hqureshi@urbanxroads.com
Alyssa Barnett
abarnett@urbanxroads.com
NOVEMBER 16, 2022
14726-02 EA Report
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................... I
APPENDICES ...................................................................................................................................... II
LIST OF EXHIBITS ................................................................................................................................ II
LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................. II
LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS ............................................................................................................ III
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 6
ES.1 Summary of Findings ..................................................................................................................... 6
ES.2 Project Requirements ................................................................................................................... 6
1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 8
1.1 Site Location .................................................................................................................................. 8
1.2 Project Description ........................................................................................................................ 8
2 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................ 12
2.1 Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 12
2.2 Electricity ..................................................................................................................................... 14
2.3 Natural Gas ................................................................................................................................. 16
2.4 Transportation Energy Resources ............................................................................................... 19
3 REGULATORY BACKGROUND ................................................................................................... 22
3.1 Federal Regulations..................................................................................................................... 22
3.2 California Regulations ................................................................................................................. 22
4 PROJECT ENERGY DEMANDS AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY MEASURES ........................................... 26
4.1 Evaluation Criteria ....................................................................................................................... 26
4.2 Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 26
4.3 Construction Energy Demands ................................................................................................... 27
4.4 Operational Energy Demands ..................................................................................................... 34
4.5 Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 36
5 CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................................................................... 41
6 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................ 44
7 CERTIFICATIONS ...................................................................................................................... 47
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
ii
APPENDICES
APPENDIX 4.1: CALEEMOD PROJECT CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS
APPENDIX 4.2: CALEEMOD PROJECT OPERATIONS EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS
APPENDIX 4.3: EMFAC2021
LIST OF EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT 1-A: LOCATION MAP ............................................................................................................. 9
EXHIBIT 1-B: SITE PLAN .................................................................................................................... 10
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE ES-1: SUMMARY OF CEQA SIGNIFICANCE FINDINGS ................................................................. 6
TABLE 2-1: TOTAL ELECRICITY SYSTEM POWER (CALIFORNIA 2021) .................................................... 13
TABLE 2-2: SCE 2020 POWER CONTENT MIX ..................................... ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED.
TABLE 4-1: CONSTRUCTION DURATION ............................................................................................. 27
TABLE 4-2: CONSTRUCTION POWER COST ......................................................................................... 28
TABLE 5-3: CONSTRUCTION ELECTRICITY USAGE ............................................................................... 28
TABLE 4-4: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ASSUMPTIONS ................................................................... 29
TABLE 5-5: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES ........................................ 30
TABLE 4-6: CONSTRUCTION TRIPS AND VMT ..................................................................................... 31
TABLE 4-7: CONSTRUCTION WORKER FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES ............................................. 32
TABLE 4-8: CONSTRUCTION VENDOR FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES ............................................. 33
TABLE 4-9: TOTAL PROJECT-GENERATED TRAFFIC ANNUAL FUEL CONSUMPTION ............................... 35
TABLE 4-10: PROJECT ANNUAL OPERATIONAL ENERGY DEMAND SUMMARY ..................................... 36
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
iii
LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS
% Percent
(1) Reference
AGSP Airport Gateway Specific Plan
AQIA Beech Logistics Center Air Quality Impact
Analysis
BACM Best Available Control Measures
BTU British Thermal Units
CalEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model
CAPCOA California Air Pollution Control Officers Association
CARB California Air Resources Board
CCR California Code of Regulations
CEC California Energy Commission
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
City City of Fontana
CPEP Clean Power and Electrification Pathway
CPUC California Public Utilities Commission
DMV Department of Motor Vehicles
EIA Energy Information Administration
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
EMFAC EMissions FACtor
FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
GHG Greenhouse Gas
GWh Gigawatt Hour
HHD Heavy-Heavy Duty Trucks
hp-hr-gal Horsepower Hours Per Gallon
IEPR Integrated Energy Policy Report
ISO Independent Service Operator
ISTEA Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act
ITE Institute of Transportation Engineers
kBTU Thousand-British Thermal Units
kWh Kilowatt Hour
LDA Light Duty Auto
LDT1/LDT2 Light-Duty Trucks
LHD1/LHD2 Light-Heavy Duty Trucks
MDV Medium Duty Trucks
MHD Medium-Heavy Duty Trucks
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
iv
MMcfd Million Cubic Feet Per Day
mpg Miles Per Gallon
MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization
PG&E Pacific Gas and Electric
Project Beech Logistics Center
PV Photovoltaic
SCAB South Coast Air Basin
SCE Southern California Edison
SDAB San Diego Air Basin
sf Square Feet
SoCalGas Southern California Gas
TEA-21 Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
U.S. United States
VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
v
This page intentionally left blank
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
6
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ES.1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
The results of this Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis is summarized below based on the
significance criteria in Section 6 of this report consistent with Appendix G of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Statute and Guidelines (CEQA Guidelines) (1). Table ES-1
shows the findings of significance for potential energy impacts under CEQA.
TABLE ES-1: SUMMARY OF CEQA SIGNIFICANCE FINDINGS
Analysis Report
Section
Significance Findings
Unmitigated Mitigated
Energy Impact #1: Would the Project result in
potentially significant environmental impact due
to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary
consumption of energy resources, during project
construction or operation?
5.0 Less Than Significant n/a
Energy Impact #2: Would the Project conflict
with or obstruct a state or local plan for
renewable energy or energy efficiency?
5.0 Less Than Significant n/a
ES.2 PROJECT REQUIREMENTS
The Project would be required to comply with regulations imposed by the federal and state
agencies that regulate energy use and consumption through various means and programs. Those
that are directly and indirectly applicable to the Project and that would assist in the reduction of
energy usage include:
• Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA)
• The Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21)
• Integrated Energy Policy Report (IEPR)
• State of California Energy Plan
• California Code Title 24, Part 6, Energy Efficiency Standards
• California Code Title 24, Part 11, California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen)
• AB 1493 Pavley Regulations and Fuel Efficiency Standards
• California’s Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS)
• Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act of 2015 (SB 350)
Consistency with the above regulations is discussed in detail in section 5 of this report.
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
7
This page intentionally left blank
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
8
1 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of the energy analysis prepared by Urban Crossroads, Inc., for
the proposed Beech Logistics Center Project (Project). The purpose of this report is to ensure that
energy implication is considered by the City of Fontana (Lead Agency), as the lead agency, and to
quantify anticipated energy usage associated with construction and operation of the proposed
Project, determine if the usage amounts are efficient, typical, or wasteful for the land use type,
and to emphasize avoiding or reducing inefficient, wasteful, and unnecessary consumption of
energy.
1.1 SITE LOCATION
The proposed project is located north of Foothill Boulevard and west of Beech Avenue in the City
of Fontana as shown on Exhibit 1-A.
1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed Project is to consist of a single 168,759-sf warehouse building. For the purposes of
this analysis, the Project has been evaluated assuming 42,190-sf of general light industrial use
(25% of building square footage) and 126,569-sf of warehouse use (75% of building square
footage). The Project is anticipated to be constructed in one phase by the year 2024. The
preliminary site plan for the proposed Project is shown on Exhibit 1-B. This analysis is intended
to describe energy impacts associated with the expected typical operational activities at the
Project site.
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
9
EXHIBIT 1-A: LOCATION MAP
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
10
EXHIBIT 1-B: SITE PLAN
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
11
This page intentionally left blank
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
12
2 EXISTING CONDITIONS
This section provides an overview of the existing energy conditions in the Project region.
2.1 OVERVIEW
The most recent data for California’s estimated total energy consumption and natural gas
consumption is from 2020, released by the United States (U.S.) Energy Information
Administration’s (EIA) California State Profile and Energy Estimates in 2021 and included (2):
• As of 2020, approximately 6,923 trillion British Thermal Unit (BTU) of energy was consumed
• As of 2020, approximately 524 million barrels of petroleum
• As of 2020, approximately 2,075 billion cubic feet of natural gas
• As of 2020, approximately 1 million short tons of coal
The California Energy Commission’s (CEC) Transportation Energy Demand Forecast released the
2018-2030 was released in order to support the 2017 Integrated Energy Policy Report. The
Transportation energy Demand Forecast 2018-2030 lays out graphs and data supporting CEC’s
projections of California’s future transportation energy demand. The projected inputs consider
expected variable changes in fuel prices, income, population, and other variables. Predictions
regarding fuel demand included:
• Gasoline demand in the transportation sector is expected to decline from approximately 15.8
billion gallons in 2017 to between 12.3 billion and 12.7 billion gallons in 2030 (3)
• Diesel demand in the transportation sector is expected to rise, increasing from approximately 3.7
billion diesel gallons in 2015 to approximately 4.7 billion in 2030 (3)
• Data from the Department of Energy states that approximately 3.9 billion gallons of diesel fuel
were consumed in 2019 (4)
The most recent data provided by the EIA for energy use in California by demand sector is from
2020 and is reported as follows:
• Approximately 34.0% transportation
• Approximately 24.6% industrial
• Approximately 21.8% residential
• Approximately 19.6% commercial (5)
In 2021, total system electric generation for California was 277,764 gigawatt hours (GWh).
California's massive electricity in-state generation system generated approximately 194,127
GWh which accounted for approximately 70% of the electricity it uses; the rest was imported
from the Pacific Northwest (12%) and the U.S. Southwest (18%) (6). Natural gas is the main source
for electricity generation at 50.19% of the total in-state electric generation system power as
shown in Table 2-1.
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
13
TABLE 2-1: TOTAL ELECTRICITY SYSTEM POWER (CALIFORNIA 2021)
Fuel Type California In-State
Generation (GWh)
% of California In-
State Generation
Northwest
Imports
(GWh)
Southwest
Imports
(GWh)
Total
Imports
(GWh)
% of
Imports
Total
California
Energy
Mix
(GWh)
Total
California
Power Mix
Coal 303 0.2% 181 7,788 7,969 9.5% 8,272 3.0%
Natural Gas 97,431 50.2% 45 7,880 7,925 9.5% 105,356 379.0%
Oil 37 0.0% - - - 0.0% 37 0.0%
Other
(Waste Heat/Petroleum Coke) 382 0.2% 68 15 83 0.1% 465 0.2%
Nuclear 16,477 8.5% 524 8,756 9,281 11.1% 25,758 9.3%
Large Hydro 12,036 6.2% 12,042 1,578 13,620 16.3% 25,656 9.2%
Unspecified - 0.0% 8,156 10,731 18,887 22.6% 18,887 6.8%
Total Thermal and
Non-Renewables 126,666 65.2% 21,017 36,748 57,764 6910.0% 184,431 66.4%
Biomass 5,381 2.8% 864 26 890 1.1% 6,271 2.3%
Geothermal 11,116 5.7% 192 1,906 2,098 2.5% 13,214 4.8%
Small Hydro 2,531 1.3% 304 1 304 0.4% 2,835 1.0%
Solar 33,260 17.1% 220 5,979 6,199 7.4% 39,458 14.2%
Wind 15,173 7.8% 9,976 6,405 16,381 19.6% 31,555 11.4%
Total Renewables 67,461 34.8% 11,555 14,317 25,872 3090.0% 93,333 33.6%
SYSTEM TOTALS 194,127 100.0% 32,572 51,064 83,636 100.0% 277,764 100.0%
Source: CECs 2021 Total System Electric Generation
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
14
An updated summary of, and context for energy consumption and energy demands within the
State is presented in “U.S. Energy Information Administration, California State Profile and Energy
Estimates, Quick Facts” excerpted below (7):
• In 2021, California was the seventh-largest producer of crude oil among the 50 states, and,
as of January 2021, it ranked third in crude oil refining capacity.
• California is the largest consumer of jet fuel and second-largest consumer of motor gasoline
among the 50 states and, the state accounted for 15% of the nation’s jet fuel consumption
and 10% of motor gasoline consumption in 2020.
• In 2019, California was the second-largest total energy consumer among the states, but its
per capita energy consumption was less than in all other states except Rhode Island, due in
part to its mild climate and its energy efficiency programs.
• In 2021, California was the nation’s top producer of electricity from solar, geothermal, and
biomass energy. The state was fourth in the nation in conventional hydroelectric power
generation, down from second in 2019, in part because of drought and increased water
demand.
• In 2021, California was the fourth-largest electricity producer in the nation, but the state
was also the nation’s second-largest consumer of electricity, and in 2020, it received about
30% of its electricity supply from generating facilities outside of California, including imports
from Mexico.
As indicated above, California is one of the nation’s leading energy‐producing states, and
California’s per capita energy use is among the nation’s most efficient. Given the nature of the
Project, the remainder of this discussion will focus on the three sources of energy that are most
relevant to the Project—namely, electricity, natural gas, and transportation fuel for vehicle trips
associated with the uses planned for the Project.
2.2 ELECTRICITY
The usage associated with electricity use were calculated using CalEEMod Version 2022.1. The
Southern California region’s electricity reliability has been of concern for the past several years
due to the planned retirement of aging facilities that depend upon once-through cooling
technologies, as well as the June 2013 retirement of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station
(San Onofre). While the once-through cooling phase-out has been ongoing since the May 2010
adoption of the State Water Resources Control Board’s once-through cooling policy, the
retirement of San Onofre complicated the situation. California Independent Service Operator
(ISO) studies revealed the extent to which the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) and the San Diego Air
Basin (SDAB) region were vulnerable to low-voltage and post-transient voltage instability
concerns. A preliminary plan to address these issues was detailed in the 2013 Integrative Energy
Policy Report (IEPR) after a collaborative process with other energy agencies, utilities, and air
districts (8). Similarly, the subsequent 2021 IEPR’s provides information and policy
recommendations on advancing a clean, reliable, and affordable energy system.
California’s electricity industry is an organization of traditional utilities, private generating
companies, and state agencies, each with a variety of roles and responsibilities to ensure that
electrical power is provided to consumers. The California ISO is a nonprofit public benefit
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
15
corporation and is the impartial operator of the State’s wholesale power grid and is charged with
maintaining grid reliability, and to direct uninterrupted electrical energy supplies to California’s
homes and communities. While utilities still own transmission assets, the ISO routes electrical
power along these assets, maximizing the use of the transmission system and its power
generation resources. The ISO matches buyers and sellers of electricity to ensure that enough
power is available to meet demand. To these ends, every five minutes the ISO forecasts electrical
demands, accounts for operating reserves, and assigns the lowest cost power plant unit to meet
demands while ensuring adequate system transmission capacities and capabilities (9).
Part of the ISO’s charge is to plan and coordinate grid enhancements to ensure that electrical
power is provided to California consumers. To this end, utilities file annual transmission
expansion/modification plans to accommodate the State’s growing electrical needs. The ISO
reviews and either approves or denies the proposed additions. In addition, and perhaps most
importantly, the ISO works with other areas in the western United States electrical grid to ensure
that adequate power supplies are available to the State. In this manner, continuing reliable and
affordable electrical power is assured to existing and new consumers throughout the State.
Electricity is currently provided to the Project site by Southern California Edison (SCE). SCE
provides electric power to more than 15 million persons in 15 counties and in 180 incorporated
cities, within a service area encompassing approximately 50,000 square miles. Based on SCE’s
2021 Power Content Label Mix, SCE derives electricity from varied energy resources including:
fossil fuels, hydroelectric generators, nuclear power plants, geothermal power plants, solar
power generation, and wind farms. SCE also purchases from independent power producers and
utilities, including out‐of‐state suppliers (10).
Table 2-2, SCE’s specific proportional shares of electricity sources in 2021. As indicated in Table
2-2, the 2021 SCE Power Mix has renewable energy at 31.4% of the overall energy resources.
Geothermal resources are at 5.7%, wind power is at 10.2%, large hydroelectric sources are at
2.3%, solar energy is at 14.9%, and coal is at 0% (11).
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
16
TABLE 2-2: SCE 2021 POWER CONTENT MIX
Energy Resources 2020 SCE Power Mix
Eligible Renewable 31.4%
Biomass & Waste 0.1%
Geothermal 5.7%
Eligible Hydroelectric 0.5%
Solar 14.9%
Wind 10.2%
Coal 0.0%
Large Hydroelectric 2.3%
Natural Gas 22.3%
Nuclear 9.2%
Other 0.2%
Unspecified Sources of power* 34.6%
Total 100%
* "Unspecified sources of power" means electricity from transactions that are not
traceable to specific generation sources
2.3 NATURAL GAS
The following summary of natural gas customers and volumes, supplies, delivery of supplies,
storage, service options, and operations is excerpted from information provided by the California
Public Utilities Commission (CPUC).
“The CPUC regulates natural gas utility service for approximately 10.8 million customers
that receive natural gas from Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E), Southern California Gas
(SoCalGas), San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E), Southwest Gas, and several smaller natural
gas utilities. The CPUC also regulates independent storage operators: Lodi Gas Storage,
Wild Goose Storage, Central Valley Storage and Gill Ranch Storage.
California's natural gas utilities provide service to over 11 million gas meters. SoCalGas
and PG&E provide service to about 5.9 million and 4.3 million customers, respectively,
while SDG&E provides service to over 800, 000 customers. In 2018, California gas utilities
forecasted that they would deliver about 4740 million cubic feet per day (MMcfd) of gas
to their customers, on average, under normal weather conditions.
The overwhelming majority of natural gas utility customers in California are residential
and small commercials customers, referred to as "core" customers. Larger volume gas
customers, like electric generators and industrial customers, are called "noncore"
customers. Although very small in number relative to core customers, noncore customers
consume about 65% of the natural gas delivered by the state's natural gas utilities, while
core customers consume about 35%.
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
17
A significant amount of gas (about 19%, or 1131 MMcfd, of the total forecasted California
consumption in 2018) is also directly delivered to some California large volume consumers,
without being transported over the regulated utility pipeline system. Those customers,
referred to as "bypass" customers, take service directly from interstate pipelines or directly
from California producers.
SDG&E and Southwest Gas' southern division are wholesale customers of SoCalGas, i.e.,
they receive deliveries of gas from SoCalGas and in turn deliver that gas to their own
customers. (Southwest Gas also provides natural gas distribution service in the Lake Tahoe
area.) Similarly, West Coast Gas, a small gas utility, is a wholesale customer of
PG&E. Some other wholesale customers are municipalities like the cities of Palo Alto, Long
Beach, and Vernon, which are not regulated by the CPUC.
Natural gas from out-of-state production basins is delivered into California via the
interstate natural gas pipeline system. The major interstate pipelines that deliver out-of-
state natural gas to California gas utilities are Gas Transmission Northwest Pipeline, Kern
River Pipeline, Transwestern Pipeline, El Paso Pipeline, Ruby Pipeline, Mojave Pipeline, and
Tuscarora. Another pipeline, the North Baja - Baja Norte Pipeline takes gas off the El Paso
Pipeline at the California/Arizona border and delivers that gas through California into
Mexico. While the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) regulates the
transportation of natural gas on the interstate pipelines, and authorizes rates for that
service, the California Public Utilities Commission may participate in FERC regulatory
proceedings to represent the interests of California natural gas consumers.
The gas transported to California gas utilities via the interstate pipelines, as well as some
of the California-produced gas, is delivered into the PG&E and SoCalGas intrastate natural
gas transmission pipelines systems (commonly referred to as California's "backbone"
pipeline system). Natural gas on the utilities' backbone pipeline systems is then delivered
to the local transmission and distribution pipeline systems, or to natural gas storage
fields. Some large volume noncore customers take natural gas delivery directly off the
high-pressure backbone and local transmission pipeline systems, while core customers
and other noncore customers take delivery off the utilities' distribution pipeline
systems. The state's natural gas utilities operate over 100,000 miles of transmission and
distribution pipelines, and thousands more miles of service lines.
Bypass customers take most of their deliveries directly off the Kern/Mojave pipeline
system, but they also take a significant amount of gas from California production.
PG&E and SoCalGas own and operate several natural gas storage fields that are located
within their service territories in northern and southern California, respectively. These
storage fields, and four independently owned storage utilities - Lodi Gas Storage, Wild
Goose Storage, Central Valley Storage, and Gill Ranch Storage - help meet peak seasonal
and daily natural gas demand and allow California natural gas customers to secure
natural gas supplies more efficiently. PG&E is a 25% owner of the Gill Ranch Storage field.
These storage fields provide a significant amount of infrastructure capacity to help meet
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
18
California's natural gas requirements, and without these storage fields, California would
need much more pipeline capacity in order to meet peak gas requirements.
Prior to the late 1980s, California regulated utilities provided virtually all natural gas
services to all their customers. Since then, the Commission has gradually restructured the
California gas industry in order to give customers more options while assuring regulatory
protections for those customers that wish to, or are required to, continue receiving utility-
provided services.
The option to purchase natural gas from independent suppliers is one of the results of this
restructuring process. Although the regulated utilities procure natural gas supplies for
most core customers, core customers have the option to purchase natural gas from
independent natural gas marketers, called "core transport agents" (CTA). Contact
information for core transport agents can be found on the utilities' web sites. Noncore
customers, on the other hand, make natural gas supply arrangements directly with
producers or with marketers.
Another option resulting from the restructuring process occurred in 1993, when the
Commission removed the utilities' storage service responsibility for noncore customers,
along with the cost of this service from noncore customers' transportation rates. The
Commission also encouraged the development of independent storage fields, and in
subsequent years, all the independent storage fields in California were
established. Noncore customers and marketers may now take storage service from the
utility or from an independent storage provider (if available), and pay for that service, or
may opt to take no storage service at all. For core customers, the Commission assures that
the utility has adequate storage capacity set aside to meet core requirements, and core
customers pay for that service.
In a 1997 decision, the Commission adopted PG&E's "Gas Accord", which unbundled
PG&E's backbone transmission costs from noncore transportation rates. This decision
gave customers and marketers the opportunity to obtain pipeline capacity rights on
PG&E's backbone transmission pipeline system, if desired, and pay for that service at rates
authorized by the Commission. The Gas Accord also required PG&E to set aside a certain
amount of backbone transmission capacity in order to deliver gas to its core customers.
Subsequent Commission decisions modified and extended the initial terms of the Gas
Accord. The "Gas Accord" framework is still in place today for PG&E's backbone and
storage rates and services and is now simply referred to as PG&E Gas Transmission and
Storage (GT&S).
In a 2006 decision, the Commission adopted a similar gas transmission framework for
Southern California, called the "firm access rights" system. SoCalGas and SDG&E
implemented the firm access rights (FAR) system in 2008, and it is now referred to as the
backbone transmission system (BTS) framework. As under the PG&E backbone
transmission system, SoCalGas backbone transmission costs are unbundled from noncore
transportation rates. Noncore customers and marketers may obtain, and pay for, firm
backbone transmission capacity at various receipt points on the SoCalGas system. A
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
19
certain amount of backbone transmission capacity is obtained for core customers to
assure meeting their requirements.
Many if not most noncore customers now use a marketer to provide for several of the
services formerly provided by the utility. That is, a noncore customer may simply arrange
for a marketer to procure its supplies, and obtain any needed storage and backbone
transmission capacity, in order to assure that it will receive its needed deliveries of natural
gas supplies. Core customers still mainly rely on the utilities for procurement service, but
they have the option to take procurement service from a CTA. Backbone transmission and
storage capacity is either set aside or obtained for core customers in amounts to assure
very high levels of service.
In order properly operate their natural gas transmission pipeline and storage systems,
PG&E and SoCalGas must balance the amount of gas received into the pipeline system and
delivered to customers or to storage fields. Some of these utilities’ storage capacity is
dedicated to this service, and under most circumstances, customers do not need to
precisely match their deliveries with their consumption. However, when too much or too
little gas is expected to be delivered into the utilities’ systems, relative to the amount being
consumed, the utilities require customers to more precisely match up their deliveries with
their consumption. And, if customers do not meet certain delivery requirements, they
could face financial penalties. The utilities do not profit from these financial penalties - the
amounts are then returned to customers as a whole. If the utilities find that they are
unable to deliver all the gas that is expected to be consumed, they may even call for a
curtailment of some gas deliveries. These curtailments are typically required for just the
largest, noncore customers. It has been many years since there has been a significant
curtailment of core customers in California.” (12)
As indicated in the preceding discussions, natural gas is available from a variety of in‐state and
out‐of‐state sources and is provided throughout the state in response to market supply and
demand. Complementing available natural gas resources, biogas may soon be available via
existing delivery systems, thereby increasing the availability and reliability of resources in total.
The CPUC oversees utility purchases and transmission of natural gas to ensure reliable and
affordable natural gas deliveries to existing and new consumers throughout the State.
2.4 TRANSPORTATION ENERGY RESOURCES
The Project would generate additional vehicle trips with resulting consumption of energy
resources, predominantly gasoline and diesel fuel. The Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV)
identified 36.2 million registered vehicles in California (13), and those vehicles consume an
estimated 17.2 billion gallons of fuel each year1. Gasoline (and other vehicle fuels) are
commercially provided commodities and would be available to the Project patrons and
employees via commercial outlets.
1 Fuel consumptions estimated utilizing information from EMFAC2021.
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
20
California’s on-road transportation system includes 396,616 lane miles, more than 26.6 million
passenger vehicles and light trucks, and almost 9.0 million medium- and heavy-duty vehicles (13).
While gasoline consumption has been declining since 2008, it is still by far the dominant fuel.
California is the second-largest consumer of petroleum products, after Texas, and accounts for
10% of the nation's total consumption. The state is the largest U.S. consumer of motor gasoline
and jet fuel, and 85% of the petroleum consumed in California is used in the transportation sector
(14).
California accounts for less than 1% of total U.S. natural gas reserves and production. As with
crude oil, California's natural gas production has experienced a gradual decline since 1985. In
2019, about 37% of the natural gas delivered to consumers went to the state's industrial sector,
and about 28% was delivered to the electric power sector. Natural gas fueled more than two-
fifths of the state's utility-scale electricity generation in 2019. The residential sector, where two-
thirds of California households use natural gas for home heating, accounted for 22% of natural
gas deliveries. The commercial sector received 12% of the deliveries to end users and the
transportation sector consumed the remaining 1% (14).
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
21
This page intentionally left blank
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
22
3 REGULATORY BACKGROUND
Federal and state agencies regulate energy use and consumption through various means and
programs. On the federal level, the United States Department of Transportation, the United
States Department of Energy, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are
three federal agencies with substantial influence over energy policies and programs. On the state
level, the CPUC and the CEC are two agencies with authority over different aspects of energy.
Relevant federal and state energy‐related laws and plans are summarized below.
3.1 FEDERAL REGULATIONS
3.1.1 INTERMODAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY ACT OF 1991 (ISTEA)
ISTEA promoted the development of inter‐modal transportation systems to maximize mobility as
well as address national and local interests in air quality and energy. ISTEA contained factors that
Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) were to address in developing transportation plans
and programs, including some energy‐related factors. To meet the new ISTEA requirements,
MPOs adopted explicit policies defining the social, economic, energy, and environmental values
guiding transportation decisions.
3.1.2 THE TRANSPORTATION EQUITY ACT FOR THE 21ST CENTURY (TEA-21)
TEA‐21 was signed into law in 1998 and builds upon the initiatives established in the ISTEA
legislation, discussed above. TEA‐21 authorizes highway, highway safety, transit, and other
efficient surface transportation programs. TEA‐21 continues the program structure established
for highways and transit under ISTEA, such as flexibility in the use of funds, emphasis on measures
to improve the environment, and focus on a strong planning process as the foundation of good
transportation decisions. TEA‐21 also provides for investment in research and its application to
maximize the performance of the transportation system through, for example, deployment of
Intelligent Transportation Systems, to help improve operations and management of
transportation systems and vehicle safety.
3.2 CALIFORNIA REGULATIONS
3.2.1 INTEGRATED ENERGY POLICY REPORT (IEPR)
Senate Bill 1389 (Bowen, Chapter 568, Statutes of 2002) requires the CEC to prepare a biennial
integrated energy policy report that assesses major energy trends and issues facing the state’s
electricity, natural gas, and transportation fuel sectors and provides policy recommendations to
conserve resources; protect the environment; ensure reliable, secure, and diverse energy
supplies; enhance the state’s economy; and protect public health and safety (Public Resources
Code § 25301[a]). The CEC prepares these assessments and associated policy recommendations
every two years, with updates in alternate years, as part of the Integrated Energy Policy Report.
The 2021 IEPR was adopted February 2022, and continues to work towards improving electricity,
natural gas, and transportation fuel energy use in California. The 2021 IEPR provides the results
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
23
of the CEC’s assessments of a variety of energy issues facing California. Many of these issues will
require action if the state is to meet its climate, energy, air quality, and other environmental goals
while maintaining reliability and controlling costs. Additionally, the 2021 IEPR provides the results
of the CEC’s assessments of a variety of energy issues facing California. Many of these issues will
require action if the state is to meet its climate, energy, air quality, and other environmental goals
while maintaining reliability and controlling costs (15).
3.2.2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY PLAN
The CEC is responsible for preparing the State Energy Plan, which identifies emerging trends
related to energy supply, demand, conservation, public health and safety, and the maintenance
of a healthy economy. The Plan calls for the state to assist in the transformation of the
transportation system to improve air quality, reduce congestion, and increase the efficient use
of fuel supplies with the least environmental and energy costs. To further this policy, the plan
identifies several strategies, including assistance to public agencies and fleet operators and
encouragement of urban designs that reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and accommodate
pedestrian and bicycle access.
3.2.3 CALIFORNIA CODE TITLE 24, PART 6, ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS
California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24 Part 6: The California Energy Code was first
adopted in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California’s energy consumption.
The standards are updated periodically to allow consideration and possible incorporation of
new energy efficient technologies and methods. CCR, Title 24, Part 11: California Green
Building Standards Code (CALGreen) is a comprehensive and uniform regulatory code for all
residential, commercial, and school buildings that went in effect on August 1, 2009, and is
administered by the California Building Standards Commission.
CALGreen is updated on a regular basis, with the most recent approved update consisting of the
2022 California Green Building Code Standards that will be effective on January 1, 20232. The
Project would be required to comply with the applicable standards in place at the time plan check
submittals are made (16).
3.2.4 AB 1493 PAVLEY REGULATIONS AND FUEL EFFICIENCY STANDARDS
California AB 1493, enacted on July 22, 2002, required CARB to develop and adopt regulations
that reduce GHGs emitted by passenger vehicles and light duty trucks. Under this legislation,
CARB adopted regulations to reduce GHG emissions from non-commercial passenger vehicles
(cars and light-duty trucks). Although aimed at reducing GHG emissions, specifically, a co-benefit
of the Pavley standards is an improvement in fuel efficiency and consequently a reduction in fuel
consumption.
2 The 2022 California Green Building Standard Code will be published July 1, 2022.
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
24
3.2.5 CALIFORNIA’S RENEWABLE PORTFOLIO STANDARD (RPS)
First established in 2002 under Senate Bill (SB) 1078, California’s Renewable Portfolio Standards
(RPS) requires retail sellers of electric services to increase procurement from eligible renewable
resources to 33% of total retail sales by 2020 (17).
3.2.6 CLEAN ENERGY AND POLLUTION REDUCTION ACT OF 2015 (SB 350)
In October 2015, the legislature approved, and the Governor signed SB 350, which reaffirms
California’s commitment to reducing its GHG emissions and addressing climate change. Key
provisions include an increase in the renewables portfolio standard (RPS), higher energy
efficiency requirements for buildings, initial strategies towards a regional electricity grid, and
improved infrastructure for electric vehicle charging stations. Specifically, SB 350 requires the
following to reduce statewide GHG emissions:
• Increase the amount of electricity procured from renewable energy sources from 33% to 50% by
2030, with interim targets of 40% by 2024, and 25% by 2027.
• Double the energy efficiency in existing buildings by 2030. This target will be achieved through
the California Public Utility Commission (CPUC), the CEC, and local publicly owned utilities.
• Reorganize the Independent System Operator (ISO) to develop more regional electrify
transmission markets and to improve accessibility in these markets, which will facilitate the
growth of renewable energy markets in the western United States (California Leginfo 2015).
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
25
This page intentionally left blank
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
26
4 PROJECT ENERGY DEMANDS AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY MEASURES
4.1 EVALUATION CRITERIA
Appendix F of the State CEQA Guidelines (18), states that the means of achieving the goal of
energy conservation includes the following:
• Decreasing overall per capita energy consumption;
• Decreasing reliance on fossil fuels such as coal, natural gas, and oil; and
• Increasing reliance on renewable energy sources.
In compliance with Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines (19), this report analyzes the
Project’s anticipated energy use during construction and operations to determine if the Project
would:
• Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary
consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation; or
• Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency.
4.2 METHODOLOGY
Information from the CalEEMod Version 2022.1 outputs for the Beech Logistics Center Air Quality
Impact Analysis (AQIA) (20) was utilized in this analysis, detailing Project related construction
equipment, transportation energy demands, and facility energy demands.
4.2.1 CALEEMOD
In May 2022, the SCAQMD, in conjunction with the California Air Pollution Control Officers
Association (CAPCOA) and other California air districts, released the latest version of the
CalEEMod Version 2022.1. The purpose of this model is to calculate construction-source and
operational-source criteria pollutants and GHG emissions from direct and indirect sources as well
as energy usage (21). Accordingly, the latest version of CalEEMod has been used to determine
the proposed Project’s anticipated transportation and facility energy demands. Outputs from the
annual model runs are provided in Appendices 4.1 through 4.2.
4.2.2 EMISSION FACTORS MODEL
On May 2, 2022, the EPA approved the 2021 version of the EMissions FACtor model (EMFAC2021)
web database for use in State Implementation Plan and transportation conformity analyses.
EMFAC2021 is a mathematical model that was developed to calculate emission rates, fuel
consumption, VMT from motor vehicles that operate on highways, freeways, and local roads in
California and is commonly used by the CARB to project changes in future emissions from on-
road mobile sources (22). This energy study utilizes the different fuel types for each vehicle class
from the annual EMFAC2021 emission inventory in order to derive the average vehicle fuel
economy which is then used to determine the estimated annual fuel consumption associated
with vehicle usage during Project construction and operational activities. For purposes of
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
27
analysis, the 2023 and 2024 analysis years were utilized to determine the average vehicle fuel
economy used throughout the duration of the Project. Outputs from the EMFAC2021 model run
is provided in Appendix 4.3.
4.3 CONSTRUCTION ENERGY DEMANDS
The focus within this section is the energy implications of the construction process, specifically
the power cost from on-site electricity consumption during construction of the proposed Project.
4.3.1 CONSTRUCTION POWER COST
The total Project construction power costs is the summation of the products of the area (sf) by
the construction duration and the typical power cost.
CONSTRUCTION DURATION
For purposes of analysis, construction of Project is expected to commence in April 2023 and
would last through April 2024 (20). The construction schedule utilized in the analysis, shown in
Table 4-1, represents a “worst-case” analysis scenario. The duration of construction activity and
associated equipment represents a reasonable approximation of the expected construction fleet
as required per CEQA Guidelines (23).
TABLE 4-1: CONSTRUCTION DURATION
Construction Activity Start Date End Date Days
Site Preparation 04/01/2023 04/10/2023 6
Grading 04/11/2023 05/10/2023 22
Building Construction 05/11/2023 01/31/2024 190
Paving 01/21/2024 04/20/2024 65
Architectural Coating 02/01/2024 04/30/2024 64
PROJECT CONSTRUCTION POWER COST
The 2022 National Construction Estimator identifies a typical power cost per 1,000 sf of
construction per month of $2.41, which was used to calculate the Project’s total construction
power cost (24).
As shown on Table 4-2, the total power cost of the on-site electricity usage during the
construction of the Project is estimated to be approximately $10,620.49.
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
28
TABLE 4-2: CONSTRUCTION POWER COST
Land Use
Power Cost
(per 1,000 SF
of construction
per month)
Size
(1,000 SF)
Construction
Duration
(months)
Project Construction
Power Cost
General Light Industrial $2.41 42.190 12 $1,220.13
Warehousing $2.41 126.569 12 $3,660.38
Landscape $2.41 40.798 12 $1,179.88
Parking $2.41 50.420 12 $1,458.15
Other Asphalt Surfaces $2.41 107.260 12 $3,101.96
CONSTRUCTION POWER COST $10,620.49
4.3.2 CONSTRUCTION ELECTRICITY USAGE
The total Project construction electricity usage is the summation of the products of the power
cost (estimated in Table 4-2) by the utility provider cost per kilowatt hour (kWh) of electricity.
PROJECT CONSTRUCTION ELECTRICITY USAGE
The SCE’s general service rate schedule were used to determine the Project’s electrical usage. As
of October 1, 2022, SCE’s general service rate is $0.14 per kilowatt hours (kWh) of electricity for
industrial services (25). As shown on Table 4-3, the total electricity usage from on-site Project
construction related activities is estimated to be approximately 75,861 kWh.
TABLE 5-3: CONSTRUCTION ELECTRICITY USAGE
Land Use Cost per kWh Project Construction
Electricity Usage (kWh)
General Light Industrial $0.14 8,715
Warehousing $0.14 26,146
Landscape $0.14 8,428
Parking $0.14 10,415
Other Asphalt Surfaces $0.14 22,157
CONSTRUCTION ELECTRICITY USAGE 75,861
4.3.3 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FUEL ESTIMATES
Fuel consumed by construction equipment would be the primary energy resource expended over
the course of Project construction.
CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
A summary of construction equipment assumptions by phase is provided at Table 4-4. In
accordance the City of Fontana City of Fontana Industrial Commerce Centers Sustainability
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
29
Ordinance, this analysis assumed the use of CARB Tier 4 Interim equipment during Project
construction.
TABLE 4-4: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ASSUMPTIONS
Construction Activity Equipment Amount Hours Per Day
Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers 5 8
Crawler Tractors 6 8
Grading
Excavators 1 8
Graders 1 8
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8
Crawler Tractors 3 8
Building Construction
Cranes 2 8
Forklifts 4 8
Generator Sets 2 8
Crawler Tractors 4 8
Welders 2 8
Paving
Pavers 2 8
Paving Equipment 2 8
Rollers 2 8
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 8
PROJECT CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FUEL CONSUMPTION
Project construction activity timeline estimates, construction equipment schedules, equipment
power ratings, load factors, and associated fuel consumption estimates are presented in Table 4-
5. The aggregate fuel consumption rate for all equipment is estimated at 18.5 horsepower hour
per gallon (hp‐hr‐gal.), obtained from CARB 2018 Emissions Factors Tables and cited fuel
consumption rate factors presented in Table D‐24 of the Moyer guidelines (26). For the purposes
of this analysis, the calculations are based on all construction equipment being diesel‐powered,
which is consistent with industry standards.
Diesel fuel would be supplied by existing commercial fuel providers serving the Project area and
region3. As presented in Table 4‐5, Project construction activities would consume an estimated
50,910 gallons of diesel fuel. Project construction would represent a “single‐event” diesel fuel
demand and would not require ongoing or permanent commitment of diesel fuel resources for
this purpose.
3 Based on Appendix A of the CalEEMod User’s Guide, Construction consists of several types of off-road equipment. Since the majority of the
off-road construction equipment used for construction projects are diesel fueled, CalEEMod assumes all of the equipment operates on diesel
fuel.
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
30
TABLE 5-5: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES
Construction Activity Duration
(Days) Equipment HP Rating Quantity Usage
Hours
Load
Factor
HP-
hrs/day
Total Fuel
Consumption
Site Preparation 6
Rubber Tired Dozers 367 5 8 0.40 5,872 1,904
Crawler Tractors 87 6 8 0.43 1,796 582
Grading 22
Excavators 36 1 8 0.38 109 130
Graders 148 1 8 0.41 485 577
Rubber Tired Dozers 367 1 8 0.40 1,174 1,397
Crawler Tractors 87 3 8 0.43 898 1,068
Building Construction 190
Cranes 367 2 8 0.29 1,703 17,489
Forklifts 82 4 8 0.20 525 5,390
Generator Sets 14 2 8 0.74 166 1,702
Welders 46 2 8 0.45 331 3,402
Crawler Tractors 87 4 8 0.43 1,197 12,295
Paving 65
Pavers 81 2 8 0.42 544 1,912
Paving Equipment 89 2 8 0.36 513 1,801
Rollers 36 2 8 0.38 219 769
Architectural Coating 64 Air Compressors 37 1 8 0.48 142 492
CONSTRUCTION FUEL DEMAND (GALLONS DIESEL FUEL) 50,910
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
31
4.3.4 CONSTRUCTION TRIPS AND VMT
Construction generates on-road vehicle emissions from vehicle usage for workers, vendors, and
haul truck commuting to and from the site. The number of workers and vendor trips are
presented below in Table 4-6. It should be noted that for vendor trips, specifically, CalEEMod only
assigns vendor trips to the Building Construction phase. Vendor trips would likely occur during all
phases of construction. As such, the CalEEMod defaults for vendor trips have been adjusted
based on a ratio of the total vendor trips to the number of days of each subphase of activity.
TABLE 4-6: CONSTRUCTION TRIPS AND VMT
Construction Activity Worker Trips
Per Day
Vendor Trips
Per Day
Hauling Trips
Per Day
Site Preparation 28 1 0
Grading 15 3 50
Building Construction 71 24 0
Paving 15 0 0
Architectural Coating 14 0 0
4.3.5 CONSTRUCTION WORKER FUEL ESTIMATES
With respect to estimated VMT for the Project, the construction worker trips (personal vehicles
used by workers commuting to the Project from home) would generate an estimated 299,700
VMT during the 12 months of construction (20). Based on CalEEMod methodology, it is assumed
that 50% of all construction worker trips are from light-duty-auto vehicles (LDA), 25% are from
light-duty-trucks (LDT14), and 25% are from light-duty-trucks (LDT25). Data regarding Project
related construction worker trips were based on CalEEMod defaults utilized within the AQIA.
Vehicle fuel efficiencies for LDA, LDT1, and LDT2 were estimated using information generated
within the 2021 version of the EMFAC developed by CARB. EMFAC2021 is a mathematical model
that was developed to calculate emission rates, fuel consumption, and VMT from motor vehicles
that operate on highways, freeways, and local roads in California and is commonly used by the
CARB to project changes in future emissions from on-road mobile sources (22). EMFAC2021 was
run for the LDA, LDT1, and LDT2 vehicle class within the California sub-area for the 2023 and 2024
calendar years. Data from EMFAC2021 is shown in Appendix 4.3.
As previously shown in Table 4‐7, the estimated annual fuel consumption resulting from Project
construction worker trips is 11,075 gallons during full construction of the Project. It should be
noted that construction worker trips would represent a “single‐event” gasoline fuel demand and
would not require ongoing or permanent commitment of fuel resources for this purpose.
4 Vehicles under the LDT1 category have a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of less than 6,000 lbs. and equivalent test weight (ETW) of less
than or equal to 3,750 lbs.
5 Vehicles under the LDT2 category have a GVWR of less than 6,000 lbs. and ETW between 3,751 lbs. and 5,750 lbs.
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
32
TABLE 4-7: CONSTRUCTION WORKER FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES
Year Construction Activity Duration
(Days)
Worker
Trips/Day
Trip
Length
(miles)
VMT
Average Vehicle
Fuel Economy
(mpg)
Estimated Fuel
Consumption
(gallons)
2023
LDA
Site Preparation 6 14 18.5 1,554 30.68 51
Grading 22 8 18.5 3,256 30.68 106
Building Construction 167 36 18.5 111,222 30.68 3,625
LDT1
Site Preparation 6 7 18.5 777 24.14 32
Grading 22 4 18.5 1,628 24.14 67
Building Construction 167 18 18.5 55,611 24.14 2,304
LDT2
Site Preparation 6 7 18.5 777 23.82 33
Grading 22 4 18.5 1,628 23.82 68
Building Construction 167 18 18.5 55,611 23.82 2,335
2024
LDA
Building Construction 23 36 18.5 15,318 31.57 485
Paving 65 8 18.5 9,620 31.57 305
Architectural Coating 64 7 18.5 8,288 31.57 262
LDT1
Building Construction 23 18 18.5 7,659 24.59 311
Paving 65 4 18.5 4,810 24.59 196
Architectural Coating 64 4 18.5 4,736 24.59 193
LDT2
Building Construction 23 18 18.5 7,659 24.51 313
Paving 65 4 18.5 4,810 24.51 196
Architectural Coating 64 4 18.5 4,736 24.51 193
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION WORKER FUEL CONSUMPTION 11,075
4.3.6 CONSTRUCTION VENDOR/HAULING FUEL ESTIMATES
With respect to estimated VMT, the construction vendor trips (vehicles that deliver materials to
the site during construction) would generate an estimated 10,568 VMT along area roadways for
the Project over the duration of construction activity (20). It is assumed that 50% of all vendor
trips are from medium-heavy duty trucks (MHD), 50% of all vendor trips are from heavy-heavy
duty trucks (HHD), and 100% of all hauling trips are HHDs. These assumptions are consistent with
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
33
the CalEEMod defaults utilized within the within the AQIA (20). Vehicle fuel efficiencies for MHDs
and HHDs were estimated using information generated within EMFAC2021. EMFAC2021 was run
for the MHD and HHD vehicle classes within the California sub-area for the 2023 and 2024
calendar years. Data from EMFAC2021 is shown in Appendix 4.3.
Based on Table 4-8, it is estimated that 10,568 gallons of fuel will be consumed related to
construction vendor trips during full construction of the Project. It should be noted that Project
construction vendor trips would represent a “single‐event” diesel fuel demand and would not
require on‐going or permanent commitment of diesel fuel resources for this purpose.
TABLE 4-8: CONSTRUCTION VENDOR FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES
Year Construction Activity Duration
(Days)
Vendor/
Hauling
Trips/Day
Trip
Length
(miles)
VMT
Average Vehicle
Fuel Economy
(mpg)
Estimated Fuel
Consumption
(gallons)
2023
MHD
Site Preparation 6 1 10.2 61 8.27 7
Grading 22 2 10.2 449 8.27 54
Building Construction 167 12 10.2 20,441 8.27 2,471
HHD (Vendor)
Site Preparation 6 1 10.2 61 5.94 10
Grading 22 2 10.2 449 5.94 76
Building Construction 167 12 10.2 20,441 5.94 3,441
HHD (Hauling)
Grading 22 50 20 22,000 5.94 3,703
2024
MHD
Building Construction 23 12 10.2 2,815 8.32 339
HHD (Vendor)
Building Construction 23 12 10.2 2,815 6.03 467
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION VENDOR/HAULING FUEL CONSUMPTION 10,568
4.3.7 CONSTRUCTION ENERGY EFFICIENCY/CONSERVATION MEASURES
Starting in 2014, CARB adopted the nation's first regulation aimed at cleaning up off-road
construction equipment such as bulldozers, graders, and backhoes. These requirements ensure
fleets gradually turnover the oldest and dirtiest equipment to newer, cleaner models and prevent
fleets from adding older, dirtier equipment. As such, the equipment used for Project construction
would conform to CARB regulations and California emissions standards. It should also be noted
that there are no unusual Project characteristics or construction processes that would require
the use of equipment that would be more energy intensive than is used for comparable activities;
or equipment that would not conform to current emissions standards (and related fuel
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
34
efficiencies). Equipment employed in construction of the Project would therefore not result in
inefficient wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of fuel.
Construction contractors would be required to comply with applicable CARB regulation regarding
retrofitting, repowering, or replacement of diesel off-road construction equipment. Additionally,
CARB has adopted the Airborne Toxic Control Measure to limit heavy-duty diesel motor vehicle
idling in order to reduce public exposure to diesel particulate matter and other Toxic Air
Contaminants. Compliance with anti-idling and emissions regulations would result in a more
efficient use of construction-related energy and the minimization or elimination of wasteful or
unnecessary consumption of energy. Idling restrictions and the use of newer engines and
equipment would result in less fuel combustion and energy consumption.
Additional construction‐source energy efficiencies would occur due to required California
regulations and best available control measures (BACM). For example, CCR Title 13, Motor
Vehicles, section 2449(d)(3) Idling, limits idling times of construction vehicles to no more than
five minutes, thereby precluding unnecessary and wasteful consumption of fuel due to
unproductive idling of construction equipment. Section 2449(d)(3) requires that grading plans
shall reference the requirement that a sign shall be posted on‐site stating that construction
workers need to shut off engines at or before five minutes of idling.” In this manner, construction
equipment operators are required to be informed that engines are to be turned off at or prior to
five minutes of idling. Enforcement of idling limitations is realized through periodic site
inspections conducted by City building officials, and/or in response to citizen complaints.
A full analysis related to the energy needed to form construction materials is not included in this
analysis due to a lack of detailed Project-specific information on construction materials. At this
time, an analysis of the energy needed to create Project-related construction materials would be
extremely speculative and thus has not been prepared.
In general, construction processes promote conservation and efficient use of energy by reducing
raw materials demands, with related reduction in energy demands associated with raw materials
extraction, transportation, processing, and refinement. Use of materials in bulk reduces energy
demands associated with preparation and transport of construction materials as well as the
transport and disposal of construction waste and solid waste in general, with corollary reduced
demands on area landfill capacities and energy consumed by waste transport and landfill
operations.
4.4 OPERATIONAL ENERGY DEMANDS
Energy consumption in support of or related to Project operations would include transportation
fuel demands (fuel consumed by passenger car and truck vehicles accessing the Project site), fuel
demands from operational equipment, and facilities energy demands (energy consumed by
building operations and site maintenance activities).
4.4.1 TRANSPORTATION FUEL DEMANDS
Energy that would be consumed by Project‐generated traffic is a function of total VMT and
estimated vehicle fuel economies of vehicles accessing the Project site. The VMT per vehicle class
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
35
can be determined by evaluated in the vehicle fleet mix and the total VMT. As with worker and
vendors trips, operational vehicle fuel efficiencies were estimated using information generated
within EMFAC2021 developed by CARB (22). EMFAC2021 was run for the San Bernardino County
area for the 2024 calendar year. Data from EMFAC2021 is shown in Appendix 4.3.
The estimated transportation energy demands are previously summarized on Table 4-9. As
summarized on Table 4-9 the Project would result in a net increase of 5,865,841 annual VMT and
an estimated net increase annual fuel consumption of 117,394 gallons of fuel.
TABLE 4-9: TOTAL PROJECT-GENERATED TRAFFIC ANNUAL FUEL CONSUMPTION
Vehicle Type Average Vehicle Fuel
Economy (mpg) Annual VMT Estimated Annual Fuel
Consumption (gallons)
LDA 31.57 675,588 21,397
LDT1 24.59 56,109 2,282
LDT2 24.51 269,010 10,977
MDV 14.97 176,616 11,800
MCY 14.97 24,150 1,613
LHDT1 15.81 69,967 4,424
LHDT2 14.97 18,856 1,260
MHDT 8.32 99,863 12,008
HHDT 6.03 311,095 51,632
TOTAL (ALL VEHICLES) 1,701,253 117,394
4.4.2 ON-SITE CARGO HANDLING EQUIPMENT FUEL DEMANDS
It is common for industrial buildings to require the operation of exterior cargo handling
equipment in the building’s truck court areas. In accordance with the City of Fontana’s Ordinance
No. 1891, on-site motorized operational equipment shall be ZE (zero emission). As such, this
analysis assumes that all on-site cargo handling equipment would be electrically powered.
4.4.3 FACILITY ENERGY DEMANDS
Project building operations activities would result in the consumption of electricity and natural
gas, which would be supplied to the Project by SCE and SoCalGas, respectively. Annual natural
gas and electricity demands of the Project are summarized in Table 4-10. As summarized on Table
4-10 the Project would result in 4,215,528 kBTU/year of natural gas and 1,031,246 kWh/year of
electricity.
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
36
TABLE 4-10: PROJECT ANNUAL OPERATIONAL ENERGY DEMAND SUMMARY
Land Use Natural Gas Demand
(kBTU/year)
Electricity Demand
(kWh/year)
General Light Industrial 1,809,365 402,397
Warehousing 2,406,163 584,585
Landscape 0 0
Parking 0 44,264
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0
TOTAL PROJECT ENERGY DEMAND 4,215,528 1,031,246
5.4.4 OPERATIONAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY/CONSERVATION MEASURES
Energy efficiency/energy conservation attributes of the Project would be complemented by
increasingly stringent state and federal regulatory actions addressing vehicle fuel economies and
vehicle emissions standards; and enhanced building/utilities energy efficiencies mandated under
California building codes (e.g., Title24, California Green Building Standards Code).
ENHANCED VEHICLE FUEL EFFICIENCIES
Project annual fuel consumption estimates presented previously in Table 4-9 represent likely
potential maximums that would occur for the Project. Under subsequent future conditions,
average fuel economies of vehicles accessing the Project site can be expected to improve as
older, less fuel-efficient vehicles are removed from circulation, and in response to fuel economy
and emissions standards imposed on newer vehicles entering the circulation system.
Enhanced fuel economies realized pursuant to federal and state regulatory actions, and related
transition of vehicles to alternative energy sources (e.g., electricity, natural gas, biofuels,
hydrogen cells) would likely decrease future gasoline fuel demands per VMT. Location of the
Project proximate to regional and local roadway systems tends to reduce VMT within the region,
acting to reduce regional vehicle energy demands.
4.5 SUMMARY
4.5.1 CONSTRUCTION ENERGY DEMANDS
The estimated power cost of on-site electricity usage during the construction of the Project is
assumed to be approximately $10,620.49. Additionally, based on the assumed power cost, it is
estimated that the total electricity usage during construction, after full Project buildout, is
calculated to be approximately 75,861 kWh.
Construction equipment used by the Project would result in single event consumption of
approximately 50,910 gallons of diesel fuel. Construction equipment use of fuel would not be
atypical for the type of construction proposed because there are no aspects of the Project’s
proposed construction process that are unusual or energy-intensive, and Project construction
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
37
equipment would conform to the applicable CARB emissions standards, acting to promote
equipment fuel efficiencies.
CCR Title 13, Title 13, Motor Vehicles, section 2449(d)(3) Idling, limits idling times of construction
vehicles to no more than 5 minutes, thereby precluding unnecessary and wasteful consumption
of fuel due to unproductive idling of construction equipment. BACMs inform construction
equipment operators of this requirement. Enforcement of idling limitations is realized through
periodic site inspections conducted by City building officials, and/or in response to citizen
complaints.
Construction worker trips for full construction of the Project would result in the estimated fuel
consumption of 11,075 gallons of fuel. Additionally, fuel consumption from construction vendor
trips (MHDs and HHDs) will total approximately 10,568 gallons. Diesel fuel would be supplied by
City and regional commercial vendors. Indirectly, construction energy efficiencies and energy
conservation would be achieved using bulk purchases, transport and use of construction
materials. The 2021 IEPR released by the CEC has shown that fuel efficiencies are getting better
within on and off-road vehicle engines due to more stringent government requirements (15). As
supported by the preceding discussions, Project construction energy consumption would not be
considered inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary.
4.5.2 OPERATIONAL ENERGY DEMANDS
TRANSPORTATION ENERGY DEMANDS
Annual vehicular trips and related VMT generated by the operation of the Project would result in
an increased fuel demand of 117,394 gallons of fuel.
Fuel would be provided by current and future commercial vendors. Trip generation and VMT
generated by the Project are consistent with other industrial uses of similar scale and
configuration, as reflected respectively in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip
Generation Manual (11th Ed., 2021); and CalEEMod. As such, Project operations would not result
in excessive and wasteful vehicle trips and VMT, nor excess and wasteful vehicle energy
consumption compared to other industrial uses.
It should be noted that the state strategy for the transportation sector for medium and heavy-
duty trucks is focused on making trucks more efficient and expediting truck turnover rather than
reducing VMT from trucks. This is in contrast to the passenger vehicle component of the
transportation sector where both per-capita VMT reductions and an increase in vehicle efficiency
are forecasted to be needed to achieve the overall state emissions reductions goals.
Heavy duty trucks involved in goods movements are generally controlled on the technology side
and through fleet turnover of older trucks and engines to newer and cleaner trucks and engines.
The first battery-electric heavy-heavy duty trucks are being tested this year and SCAQMD is
looking to integrate this new technology into large-scale truck operations. The following state
strategies reduce GHG emissions from the medium and heavy-duty trucks:
• CARB’s Mobile Source Strategy focuses on reducing GHGs through the transition to zero and low
emission vehicles and from medium-duty and heavy-duty trucks.
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
38
• CARB’s Sustainable Freight Action Plan establishes a goal to improve freight efficiency by 25% by
2030, deploy over 100,000 freight vehicles and equipment capable of zero emission operation
and maximize both zero and near-zero emission freight vehicles and equipment powered by
renewable energy by 2030.
• CARB’s Emissions Reduction Plan for Ports and Goods Movement (Goods Movement Plan) in
California focuses on reducing heavy-duty truck-related emissions focus on establishment of
emissions standards for trucks, fleet turnover, truck retrofits, and restriction on truck idling (CARB
2006). While the focus of Goods Movement Plan is to reduce criteria air pollutant and air toxic
emissions, the strategies to reduce these pollutants would also generally have a beneficial effect
in reducing GHG emissions.
• CARB’s On-Road Truck and Bus Regulation (2010) requires diesel trucks and buses that operate in
California to be upgraded to reduce emissions. Newer heavier trucks and buses must meet
particulate matter filter requirements beginning January 1, 2012. Lighter and older heavier trucks
must be replaced starting January 1, 2015. By January 1, 2023, nearly all trucks and buses will
need to have 2010 model year engines or equivalent (27).
• CARB’s Heavy-Duty (Tractor-Trailer) GHG Regulation requires SmartWay tractor trailers that
include idle-reduction technologies, aerodynamic technologies, and low-rolling resistant tires that
would reduce fuel consumption and associated GHG emissions.
The proposed Project would implement project design features that would facilitate the
accessibility, parking, and loading of trucks on-site.
Enhanced fuel economies realized pursuant to federal and state regulatory actions, and related
transition of vehicles to alternative energy sources (e.g., electricity, natural gas, biofuels,
hydrogen cells) would likely decrease future gasoline fuel demands per VMT. Location of the
Project proximate to regional and local roadway systems tends to reduce VMT within the region,
acting to reduce regional vehicle energy demands. The Project would implement sidewalks,
facilitating and encouraging pedestrian access. Facilitating pedestrian and bicycle access would
reduce VMT and associated energy consumption. In compliance with the California Green
Building Standards Code and City requirements, the Project would promote the use of bicycles
as an alternative mean of transportation by providing short-term and/or long-term bicycle
parking accommodations. As supported by the preceding discussions, Project transportation
energy consumption would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary.
ON-SITE CARGO HANDLING EQUIPMENT FUEL DEMANDS
As previously stated, it is common for industrial buildings to require the operation of exterior
cargo handling equipment in the building’s truck court areas. In accordance with the City of
Fontana’s Ordinance No. 1891, on-site motorized operational equipment shall be ZE (zero
emission). As such, this analysis assumes that all on-site cargo handling equipment would be
electrically powered.
FACILITY ENERGY DEMANDS
Project facility operational energy demands are estimated to be: 4,215,528 kBTU/year of natural
gas and 1,031,246 kWh/year of electricity. Natural gas will be supplied to the Project by SoCalGas
and electricity would be supplied by SCE. The Project proposes conventional industrial uses
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
39
reflecting contemporary energy efficient/energy conserving designs and operational programs.
The Project does not propose uses that are inherently energy intensive and the energy demands
in total would be comparable to other industrial uses of similar scale and configuration.
Lastly, the Project will comply with the applicable Title 24 standards. Compliance itself with
applicable Title 24 standards will ensure that the Project energy demands would not be
inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary.
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
40
This page intentionally left blank
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
41
5 CONCLUSIONS
5.1 ENERGY IMPACT 1
Would the Project result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or
operation?
As supported by the preceding analyses, Project construction and operations would not result in
the inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of energy. The Project would therefore not
cause or result in the need for additional energy producing or transmission facilities. The Project
would not engage in wasteful or inefficient uses of energy and aims to achieve energy
conservations goals within the State of California.
5.2 ENERGY IMPACT 2
Would the Project conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy
efficiency?
The Project’s consistency with the applicable state and local plans is discussed below.
CONSISTENCY WITH ISTEA
Transportation and access to the Project site is provided by the local and regional roadway
systems. The Project would not interfere with, nor otherwise obstruct intermodal transportation
plans or projects that may be realized pursuant to the ISTEA because SCAG is not planning for
intermodal facilities on or through the Project site.
CONSISTENCY WITH TEA-21
The Project site is located along major transportation corridors with proximate access to the
Interstate freeway system. The site selected for the Project facilitates access, acts to reduce
vehicle miles traveled, takes advantage of existing infrastructure systems, and promotes land use
compatibilities through collocation of similar uses. The Project supports the strong planning
processes emphasized under TEA‐21. The Project is therefore consistent with, and would not
otherwise interfere with, nor obstruct implementation of TEA‐21.
CONSISTENCY WITH IEPR
Electricity would be provided to the Project by SCE. SCE’s Clean Power and Electrification Pathway
(CPEP) white paper builds on existing state programs and policies. As such, the Project is
consistent with, and would not otherwise interfere with, nor obstruct implementation the goals
presented in the 2021 IEPR.
Additionally, the Project will comply with the applicable Title 24 standards which would ensure
that the Project energy demands would not be inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary.
As such, development of the proposed Project would support the goals presented in the 2020
IEPR.
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
42
CONSISTENCY WITH STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY PLAN
The Project site is located along major transportation corridors with proximate access to the
Interstate freeway system. The site selected for the Project facilitates access and takes advantage
of existing infrastructure systems. The Project therefore supports urban design and planning
processes identified under the State of California Energy Plan, is consistent with, and would not
otherwise interfere with or obstruct, implementation of the State of California Energy Plan.
CONSISTENCY WITH CALIFORNIA CODE TITLE 24, PART 6, ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS
The 2022 version of Title 24 was adopted by the CEC and will become effective on January 1,
2023. As the Project building construction is anticipated in 2024, it is presumed that the Project
would be required to comply with the Title 24 standards in place at that time. Therefore, the
Project would not result in a significant impact on energy resources (16). The proposed Project
would be subject to Title 24 standards.
CONSISTENCY WITH CALIFORNIA CODE TITLE 24, PART 11, CALGREEN
As previously stated, CCR, Title 24, Part 11: CALGreen is a comprehensive and uniform regulatory
code for all residential, commercial, and school buildings that went in effect on January 1, 2009,
and is administered by the California Building Standards Commission. CALGreen is updated on a
regular basis, with the most recent approved update consisting of the 2022 California Green
Building Code Standards that were published on July 1, 2022 and will become effective on January
1, 2023. The Project would be required to comply with the applicable standards in place at the
time plan check submittals are made.
CONSISTENCY WITH AB 1493
AB 1493 is not applicable to the Project as it is a statewide measure establishing vehicle emissions
standards. No feature of the Project would interfere with implementation of the requirements
under AB 1493.
CONSISTENCY WITH RPS
California’s RPS is not applicable to the Project as it is a statewide measure that establishes a
renewable energy mix. No feature of the Project would interfere with implementation of the
requirements under RPS.
CONSISTENCY WITH SB 350
The proposed Project would use energy from SCE, which have committed to diversify their
portfolio of energy sources by increasing energy from wind and solar sources. No feature of the
Project would interfere with implementation of SB 350. Additionally, the Project would be
designed and constructed to implement the energy efficiency measures for new industrial
developments and would include several measures designed to reduce energy consumption.
As shown above, the Project would not conflict with any of the state or local plans. As such, a less
than significant impact is expected.
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
43
This page intentionally left blank
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
44
6 REFERENCES
1. Association of Environmental Professionals. 2020 CEQA California Environmental Quality Act. 2020.
2. Administration, U.S. Energy Information. California State Profile and Energy Estimates. [Online]
https://www.eia.gov/state/data.php?sid=CA#ConsumptionExpenditures.
3. California Energy Commission. Transportation Energy Demand Forecast 2018-2030. 2018.
4. U.S. Department of Energy. Alternate Fuels Data Center. U.S. Department of Energy. [Online]
https://afdc.energy.gov/states/ca.
5. U.S. Energy Information Administration. California Energy Consumption by End-Use Sector. California
State Profile and Energy Estimates. [Online] https://www.eia.gov/state/?sid=CA#tabs-2.
6. California Energy Commission. 2021 Total System Electric Generation. CA.gov. [Online]
https://www.energy.ca.gov/data-reports/energy-almanac/california-electricity-data/2021-total-
system-electric-
generation#:~:text=Total%20generation%20for%20California%20was,from%2090%2C208%20GWh%
20in%202020)..
7. U.S. Energy Information Administration. California State Profile and Energy Estimates. [Online]
https://www.eia.gov/state/?sid=CA.
8. California Energy Commission. 2013 Integrated Energy Policy Report. 2013.
9. California ISO. Understanding the ISO. [Online]
http://www.caiso.com/about/Pages/OurBusiness/UnderstandingtheISO/default.aspx.
10. Southern California Edison. Southern California Edison's Service Area. [Online]
https://download.newsroom.edison.com/create_memory_file/?f_id=5cc32d492cfac24d21aecf4c
&content_verified=True.
11. Southern Californai Edison. 2019 Power Content Label. Southern California Edison. [Online]
https://www.sce.com/sites/default/files/inline-files/SCE_2019PowerContentLabel.pdf.
12. California Public Utilities Commission. Natural Gas and California. [Online]
https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/industries-and-topics/natural-gas/natural-gas-and-california.
13. Department of Motor Vehicles. State of California Department of Motor Vehicles Statistics For
Publication January Through December 2021. 2021.
14. U.S. Energy Information Administration. California Analysis. Energy Information Administration.
[Online] https://www.eia.gov/beta/states/states/ca/analysis.
15. California Energy Commission Staff. 2021 Integrated Energy Policy Report Update. [Online] 2021.
https://www.energy.ca.gov/data-reports/reports/integrated-energy-policy-report/2021-
integrated-energy-policy-report.
16. The California Energy Commission. 2022 Building Energy Efficiency Standards. California Energy
Commission. [Online] 2022. https://www.energy.ca.gov/programs-and-topics/programs/building-
energy-efficiency-standards/2022-building-energy-efficiency.
17. California Energy Commission. Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS). [Online] 2002.
http://www.energy.ca.gov/portfolio/.
18. State of California. California Environmental Quality Act Guideline, California Public Resources
Code, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3,.
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
45
19. Association of Environmental Professionals. 2019 CEQA California Environmental Quality Act.
2019.
20. Urban Crossroads, Inc. Beech Logistics Center Air Quality Impact Analysis. 2022.
21. California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). California Emissions Estimator
Model (CalEEMod). [Online] May 2022. www.caleemod.com.
22. California Department of Transportation. EMFAC Software. [Online]
http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/env/air/pages/emfac.htm.
23. State of California. 2019 CEQA California Environmental Quality Act. 2019.
24. Pray, Richard. 2022 National Construction Estimator. Carlsbad : Craftsman Book Company, 2022.
25. Southern California Edison. Schedule GS-1 General Service. Regulatory Information - Rates Pricing.
[Online] https://www.sce.com/regulatory/tariff-books/rates-pricing-choices.
26. California Air Resources Board. Methods to Find the Cost‐Effectiveness of Funding Air Quality
Projects For Evaluating Motor Vehicle Registration Fee Projects And Congestion Mitigation and Air
Quality Improvement (CMAQ) Projects, Emission Factor Tables. 2018.
27. —. Truck and Bus Regulation. [Online] https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/truck-and-
bus-regulation.
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
46
This page intentionally left blank
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
47
7 CERTIFICATIONS
The contents of this energy analysis report represent an accurate depiction of the environmental
impacts associated with the proposed Beech Logistics Center. The information contained in this
energy analysis report is based on the best available data at the time of preparation. If you have
any questions, please contact me directly at hqureshi@urbanxroads.com.
Haseeb Qureshi
Associate Principal
Urban Crossroads, Inc.
hqureshi@urbanxroads.com
EDUCATION
Master of Science in Environmental Studies
California State University, Fullerton • May 2010
Bachelor of Arts in Environmental Analysis and Design
University of California, Irvine • June 2006
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
AEP – Association of Environmental Planners
AWMA – Air and Waste Management Association
ASTM – American Society for Testing and Materials
PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS
Planned Communities and Urban Infill – Urban Land Institute • June 2011
Indoor Air Quality and Industrial Hygiene – EMSL Analytical • April 2008
Principles of Ambient Air Monitoring – California Air Resources Board • August 2007
AB2588 Regulatory Standards – Trinity Consultants • November 2006
Air Dispersion Modeling – Lakes Environmental • June 2006
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
This page intentionally left blank
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
APPENDIX 4.1:
CALEEMOD PROJECT CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS
Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
1 / 31
Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated) Detailed Report
Table of Contents
1. Basic Project Information
1.1. Basic Project Information
1.2. Land Use Types
1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector
2. Emissions Summary
2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
3. Construction Emissions Details
3.1. Site Preparation (2023) - Unmitigated
3.3. Grading (2023) - Unmitigated
3.5. Building Construction (2023) - Unmitigated
3.7. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated
3.9. Paving (2024) - Unmitigated
3.11. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated
Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
2 / 31
4. Operations Emissions Details
4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated
4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated
4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated
5. Activity Data
5.1. Construction Schedule
5.2. Off-Road Equipment
5.2.1. Unmitigated
5.3. Construction Vehicles
5.3.1. Unmitigated
5.4. Vehicles
5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
5.5. Architectural Coatings
5.6. Dust Mitigation
5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
3 / 31
5.7. Construction Paving
5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors
5.18. Vegetation
5.18.1. Land Use Change
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
5.18.2. Sequestration
5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
6. Climate Risk Detailed Report
6.1. Climate Risk Summary
6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
7. Health and Equity Details
7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
4 / 31
7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
7.4. Health & Equity Measures
7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
8. User Changes to Default Data
Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
5 / 31
1. Basic Project Information
1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated)
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s)2.80
Precipitation (days)6.40
Location 34.108970164547955, -117.47238518529332
County San Bernardino-South Coast
City Fontana
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5304
EDFZ 10
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft)Landscape Area (sq
ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
General Light
Industry
42.2 1000sqft 1.20 42,190 10,200 0.00 ——
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
127 1000sqft 3.61 126,569 30,599 0.00 ——
Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
6 / 31
Parking Lot 183 Space 1.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 ——
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
107 1000sqft 2.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 ——
1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector
No measures selected
2. Emissions Summary
2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Un/Mit.TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.1.27 13.8 25.4 50.9 0.08 0.18 9.72 9.89 0.17 4.56 4.72 —9,427 9,427 0.56 0.61 8.65 9,465
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.1.37 13.8 24.9 43.4 0.06 0.27 1.33 1.60 0.26 0.32 0.58 —8,008 8,008 0.36 0.20 0.18 8,078
Average
Daily
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.0.58 2.48 9.52 17.2 0.03 0.09 0.88 0.98 0.09 0.28 0.37 —3,492 3,492 0.18 0.12 1.55 3,535
Annual
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.0.11 0.45 1.74 3.13 0.01 0.02 0.16 0.18 0.02 0.05 0.07 —578 578 0.03 0.02 0.26 585
2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
7 / 31
Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily -
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
2023 1.27 1.25 25.4 50.9 0.08 0.18 9.72 9.89 0.17 4.56 4.72 —9,427 9,427 0.56 0.61 8.65 9,465
2024 0.42 13.8 8.77 14.3 0.02 0.13 0.38 0.51 0.12 0.09 0.21 —2,107 2,107 0.09 0.03 1.67 2,119
Daily -
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
2023 1.08 0.98 17.7 32.2 0.05 0.18 1.13 1.31 0.17 0.27 0.45 —6,325 6,325 0.30 0.19 0.17 6,388
2024 1.37 13.8 24.9 43.4 0.06 0.27 1.33 1.60 0.26 0.32 0.58 —8,008 8,008 0.36 0.20 0.18 8,078
Average
Daily
——————————————————
2023 0.58 0.51 9.52 17.2 0.03 0.09 0.88 0.98 0.09 0.28 0.37 —3,492 3,492 0.18 0.12 1.55 3,535
2024 0.14 2.48 2.63 4.40 0.01 0.03 0.14 0.17 0.03 0.03 0.06 —752 752 0.03 0.02 0.29 758
Annual ——————————————————
2023 0.11 0.09 1.74 3.13 0.01 0.02 0.16 0.18 0.02 0.05 0.07 —578 578 0.03 0.02 0.26 585
2024 0.03 0.45 0.48 0.80 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01 —124 124 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 125
3. Construction Emissions Details
3.1. Site Preparation (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Onsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
1.09 1.09 25.2 48.3 0.08 0.17 —0.17 0.17 —0.17 —8,984 8,984 0.36 0.07 —9,014
Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
8 / 31
Dust
From
Material
Movement
——————9.35 9.35 —4.47 4.47 ———————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.02 0.02 0.41 0.79 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —148 148 0.01 < 0.005 —148
Dust
From
Material
Movement
——————0.15 0.15 —0.07 0.07 ———————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —24.4 24.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 —24.5
Dust
From
Material
Movement
——————0.03 0.03 —0.01 0.01 ———————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.17 0.15 0.15 2.59 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 —411 411 0.02 0.01 1.76 418
Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —31.7 31.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 33.2
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
9 / 31
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 —6.28 6.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.37
Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.52 0.52 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.55
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 —1.04 1.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.05
Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.09 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.3. Grading (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Onsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.42 0.42 11.0 19.0 0.03 0.09 —0.09 0.09 —0.09 —3,134 3,134 0.13 0.03 —3,144
Dust
From
Material
Movement
——————2.26 2.26 —0.94 0.94 ———————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
10 / 31
——————————————————Average
Daily
Off-Road
Equipment
0.03 0.03 0.66 1.15 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —189 189 0.01 < 0.005 —190
Dust
From
Material
Movement
——————0.14 0.14 —0.06 0.06 ———————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.12 0.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —31.3 31.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 —31.4
Dust
From
Material
Movement
——————0.02 0.02 —0.01 0.01 ———————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.09 0.08 0.08 1.39 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 —220 220 0.01 0.01 0.94 224
Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.11 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —95.1 95.1 0.01 0.01 0.26 99.7
Hauling 0.49 0.07 4.51 2.51 0.02 0.04 0.26 0.31 0.04 0.09 0.13 —3,573 3,573 0.41 0.57 7.44 3,760
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 —12.3 12.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 12.5
Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —5.73 5.73 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.00
Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
11 / 31
Hauling 0.03 < 0.005 0.29 0.15 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 —215 215 0.02 0.03 0.19 226
Annual ——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 —2.04 2.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.07
Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.95 0.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.99
Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —35.7 35.7 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 37.5
3.5. Building Construction (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Onsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.59 0.59 16.3 26.8 0.05 0.17 —0.17 0.16 —0.16 —4,609 4,609 0.19 0.04 —4,625
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.59 0.59 16.3 26.8 0.05 0.17 —0.17 0.16 —0.16 —4,609 4,609 0.19 0.04 —4,625
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.27 0.27 7.51 12.3 0.02 0.08 —0.08 0.08 —0.08 —2,119 2,119 0.09 0.02 —2,127
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
12 / 31
Off-Road
Equipment
0.05 0.05 1.37 2.25 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —351 351 0.01 < 0.005 —352
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.43 0.39 0.38 6.57 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 —1,043 1,043 0.04 0.04 4.47 1,059
Vendor 0.09 0.02 0.90 0.49 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.05 0.01 0.02 0.03 —761 761 0.06 0.11 2.10 798
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.40 0.37 0.44 4.94 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 —956 956 0.05 0.04 0.12 967
Vendor 0.08 0.02 0.94 0.49 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.05 0.01 0.02 0.03 —761 761 0.06 0.11 0.05 796
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker 0.18 0.17 0.20 2.40 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 —446 446 0.02 0.02 0.89 452
Vendor 0.04 0.01 0.43 0.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 —350 350 0.03 0.05 0.42 366
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.44 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 —73.8 73.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15 74.8
Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —57.9 57.9 < 0.005 0.01 0.07 60.7
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.7. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
13 / 31
Onsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.59 0.59 16.3 26.8 0.05 0.17 —0.17 0.16 —0.16 —4,608 4,608 0.19 0.04 —4,624
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.04 0.04 0.99 1.63 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —280 280 0.01 < 0.005 —281
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.01 0.01 0.18 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —46.3 46.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 —46.4
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.39 0.35 0.41 4.54 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 —937 937 0.04 0.04 0.11 949
Vendor 0.08 0.02 0.90 0.47 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.05 0.01 0.02 0.03 —753 753 0.06 0.11 0.05 788
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
14 / 31
——————————————————Average
Daily
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.29 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 —57.6 57.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 58.5
Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —45.7 45.7 < 0.005 0.01 0.05 47.8
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 —9.54 9.54 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 9.68
Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —7.56 7.56 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.92
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.9. Paving (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Onsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.23 0.23 7.21 10.6 0.01 0.09 —0.09 0.08 —0.08 —1,512 1,512 0.06 0.01 —1,517
Paving —0.15 ————————————————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.23 0.23 7.21 10.6 0.01 0.09 —0.09 0.08 —0.08 —1,512 1,512 0.06 0.01 —1,517
Paving —0.15 ————————————————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
15 / 31
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.04 0.04 1.28 1.89 < 0.005 0.02 —0.02 0.01 —0.01 —269 269 0.01 < 0.005 —270
Paving —0.03 ————————————————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.01 0.01 0.23 0.34 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —44.6 44.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 —44.7
Paving —< 0.005 ————————————————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.09 0.08 0.07 1.27 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 —216 216 0.01 0.01 0.86 219
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.09 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 —198 198 0.01 0.01 0.02 200
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.18 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 —35.7 35.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 36.3
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
16 / 31
Annual ——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 —5.92 5.92 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.00
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.11. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Onsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.03 0.03 1.43 1.28 < 0.005 0.04 —0.04 0.04 —0.04 —178 178 0.01 < 0.005 —179
Architect
ural
Coatings
—13.3 ————————————————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.03 0.03 1.43 1.28 < 0.005 0.04 —0.04 0.04 —0.04 —178 178 0.01 < 0.005 —179
Architect
ural
Coatings
—13.3 ————————————————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
17 / 31
31.3—< 0.005< 0.00531.231.2—0.01—0.010.01—0.01< 0.0050.230.25< 0.005< 0.005Off-Road
Equipment
Architect
ural
Coatings
—2.32 ————————————————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —5.17 5.17 < 0.005 < 0.005 —5.19
Architect
ural
Coatings
—0.42 ————————————————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.07 1.18 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 —202 202 0.01 0.01 0.81 205
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.89 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 —185 185 0.01 0.01 0.02 187
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.16 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 —32.9 32.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 33.3
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
18 / 31
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 —5.44 5.44 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.52
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4. Operations Emissions Details
4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Vegetatio
n
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
19 / 31
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Avoided ——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Remove
d
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
———————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Avoided ——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
20 / 31
Sequest ——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Remove
d
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
———————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Avoided ——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Remove
d
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
———————————————————
5. Activity Data
5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description
Site Preparation Site Preparation 4/1/2023 4/10/2023 5.00 6.00 —
Grading Grading 4/11/2023 5/10/2023 5.00 22.0 —
Building Construction Building Construction 5/11/2023 1/31/2024 5.00 190 —
Paving Paving 1/21/2024 4/20/2024 5.00 65.0 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 2/1/2024 4/30/2024 5.00 64.0 —
5.2. Off-Road Equipment
Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
21 / 31
5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 5.00 8.00 367 0.40
Grading Excavators Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Grading Graders Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 148 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 367 0.40
Building Construction Cranes Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 367 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Tier 4 Interim 4.00 8.00 82.0 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 14.0 0.74
Building Construction Welders Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 46.0 0.45
Paving Pavers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 89.0 0.36
Paving Rollers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 37.0 0.48
Site Preparation Crawler Tractors Diesel Tier 4 Interim 6.00 8.00 87.0 0.43
Grading Crawler Tractors Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 8.00 87.0 0.43
Building Construction Crawler Tractors Diesel Tier 4 Interim 4.00 8.00 87.0 0.43
5.3. Construction Vehicles
5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix
Site Preparation ————
Site Preparation Worker 28.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor 1.00 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 HHDT
Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
22 / 31
Grading ————
Grading Worker 15.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor 3.00 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 50.0 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 HHDT
Building Construction ————
Building Construction Worker 71.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 24.0 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 HHDT
Paving ————
Paving Worker 15.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor 0.00 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 HHDT
Architectural Coating ————
Architectural Coating Worker 14.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor 0.00 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 HHDT
5.4. Vehicles
5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.
5.5. Architectural Coatings
Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
23 / 31
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)Phase Name Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 260,239 86,746 9,467
5.6. Dust Mitigation
5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (Cubic Yards)Material Exported (Cubic Yards)Acres Graded (acres)Material Demolished (sq. ft.)Acres Paved (acres)
Site Preparation 0.00 0.00 33.0 0.00 —
Grading 8,764 0.00 55.0 0.00 —
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.62
5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied Frequency (per day)PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction
Water Exposed Area 3 74%74%
5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres)% Asphalt
General Light Industry 0.00 0%
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.00 0%
Parking Lot 1.16 100%
Other Asphalt Surfaces 2.46 100%
5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors
kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O
Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
24 / 31
2023 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005
2024 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005
5.18. Vegetation
5.18.1. Land Use Change
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres
5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres
5.18.2. Sequestration
5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year)Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)
6. Climate Risk Detailed Report
6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG
emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.
Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 21.7 annual days of extreme heat
Extreme Precipitation 5.25 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm
Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
25 / 31
Sea Level Rise 0.00 meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 0.00 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed
historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full
day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider different
increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four simulations make
different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature
possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 50 meters (m) by 50 m, or about 164 feet (ft) by 164 ft.
Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate,
vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make
different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature
possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score
Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise N/A N/A N/A N/A
Wildfire N/A N/A N/A N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality N/A N/A N/A N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest
exposure.
The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the
greatest ability to adapt.
The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.
6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score
Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
26 / 31
Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise N/A N/A N/A N/A
Wildfire N/A N/A N/A N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality N/A N/A N/A N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest
exposure.
The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the
greatest ability to adapt.
The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.
6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
7. Health and Equity Details
7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.
Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 97.0
AQ-PM 91.2
AQ-DPM 44.6
Drinking Water 66.7
Lead Risk Housing 17.7
Pesticides 0.00
Toxic Releases 70.1
Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
27 / 31
Traffic 22.7
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 0.00
Groundwater 0.00
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 87.1
Impaired Water Bodies 0.00
Solid Waste 0.00
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 35.5
Cardio-vascular 74.9
Low Birth Weights 90.0
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 67.1
Housing 32.3
Linguistic 42.1
Poverty 46.6
Unemployment 60.6
7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.
Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 73.87398948
Employed 66.08494803
Median HI —
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 33.61991531
Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
28 / 31
High school enrollment 16.64314128
Preschool enrollment 6.954959579
Transportation —
Auto Access 81.29090209
Active commuting 28.82073656
Social —
2-parent households 63.10791736
Voting 37.89298088
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 69.81906839
Park access 24.90696779
Retail density 29.59065828
Supermarket access 48.50506865
Tree canopy 11.20236109
Housing —
Homeownership 87.77107661
Housing habitability 74.22045425
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 66.09778006
Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 33.49159502
Uncrowded housing 67.80443988
Health Outcomes —
Insured adults 47.32452201
Arthritis 87.4
Asthma ER Admissions 59.8
High Blood Pressure 83.5
Cancer (excluding skin)80.0
Asthma 58.2
Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
29 / 31
Coronary Heart Disease 90.3
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 88.0
Diagnosed Diabetes 65.9
Life Expectancy at Birth 84.7
Cognitively Disabled 85.7
Physically Disabled 88.8
Heart Attack ER Admissions 27.3
Mental Health Not Good 56.0
Chronic Kidney Disease 79.8
Obesity 44.4
Pedestrian Injuries 39.5
Physical Health Not Good 65.0
Stroke 88.3
Health Risk Behaviors —
Binge Drinking 15.4
Current Smoker 63.1
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 61.9
Climate Change Exposures —
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 45.9
Elderly 96.3
English Speaking 60.3
Foreign-born 41.2
Outdoor Workers 55.6
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 52.6
Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
30 / 31
Traffic Density 33.7
Traffic Access 23.0
Other Indices —
Hardship 49.3
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 49.9
7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a)58.0
Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b)51.0
Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535)No
Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550)No
Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617)No
a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.
b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.
7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.
7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.
7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.
8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Total Project area is 8.43 acres
Beech Logistics Center (Construction - Unmitigated) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
31 / 31
Construction: Construction Phases Construction anticipated to end in 2024
Construction: Off-Road Equipment Crawler Tractors used in lieu of Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Construction: Trips and VMT Vendor Trips adjusted based on CalEEMod defaults for Building Construction and number of days for
Site Preparation, Grading, and Building Construction
Construction: Architectural Coatings Rule 1113
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
This page intentionally left blank
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
APPENDIX 4.2:
CALEEMOD PROJECT OPERATIONS EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
1 / 32
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report
Table of Contents
1. Basic Project Information
1.1. Basic Project Information
1.2. Land Use Types
1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector
2. Emissions Summary
2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
4. Operations Emissions Details
4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use
4.1.1. Unmitigated
4.2. Energy
4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
4.3. Area Emissions by Source
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
2 / 32
4.3.2. Unmitigated
4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use
4.4.2. Unmitigated
4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use
4.5.2. Unmitigated
4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use
4.6.1. Unmitigated
4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type
4.7.1. Unmitigated
4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type
4.8.1. Unmitigated
4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type
4.9.1. Unmitigated
4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated
4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated
4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
3 / 32
5. Activity Data
5.9. Operational Mobile Sources
5.9.1. Unmitigated
5.10. Operational Area Sources
5.10.1. Hearths
5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
5.11. Operational Energy Consumption
5.11.1. Unmitigated
5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption
5.12.1. Unmitigated
5.13. Operational Waste Generation
5.13.1. Unmitigated
5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment
5.14.1. Unmitigated
5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
4 / 32
5.15.1. Unmitigated
5.16. Stationary Sources
5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
5.16.2. Process Boilers
5.17. User Defined
5.18. Vegetation
5.18.1. Land Use Change
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
5.18.2. Sequestration
5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
6. Climate Risk Detailed Report
6.1. Climate Risk Summary
6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
5 / 32
7. Health and Equity Details
7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
7.4. Health & Equity Measures
7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
8. User Changes to Default Data
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
6 / 32
1. Basic Project Information
1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations)
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s)2.80
Precipitation (days)6.40
Location 34.108970164547955, -117.47238518529332
County San Bernardino-South Coast
City Fontana
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5304
EDFZ 10
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft)Landscape Area (sq
ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
General Light
Industry
42.2 1000sqft 1.20 42,190 10,200 0.00 ——
User Defined
Industrial
42.2 User Defined Unit 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ——
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
7 / 32
Parking Lot 183 Space 1.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 ——
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
107 1000sqft 2.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 ——
1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector
No measures selected
2. Emissions Summary
2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Un/Mit.TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.1.32 2.16 1.87 12.2 0.03 0.06 0.82 0.88 0.06 0.15 0.21 46.9 3,806 3,853 4.97 0.22 20.9 4,063
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.0.95 1.81 1.95 8.53 0.03 0.06 0.82 0.88 0.06 0.15 0.20 46.9 3,642 3,688 4.97 0.22 11.2 3,889
Average
Daily
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.0.93 1.81 1.58 7.85 0.02 0.05 0.60 0.65 0.05 0.11 0.16 46.9 2,974 3,020 4.93 0.18 14.1 3,210
Annual
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.0.17 0.33 0.29 1.43 < 0.005 0.01 0.11 0.12 0.01 0.02 0.03 7.76 492 500 0.82 0.03 2.34 532
2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
8 / 32
Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Mobile 0.94 0.79 1.37 9.93 0.03 0.02 0.82 0.84 0.02 0.15 0.17 —2,728 2,728 0.14 0.16 9.91 2,790
Area 0.33 1.34 0.02 1.83 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —7.55 7.55 < 0.005 < 0.005 —7.77
Energy 0.05 0.03 0.49 0.41 < 0.005 0.04 —0.04 0.04 —0.04 —1,007 1,007 0.09 0.01 —1,011
Water ———————————18.7 64.3 83.0 1.92 0.05 —145
Waste ———————————28.2 0.00 28.2 2.82 0.00 —98.6
Refrig.————————————————11.0 11.0
Total 1.32 2.16 1.87 12.2 0.03 0.06 0.82 0.88 0.06 0.15 0.21 46.9 3,806 3,853 4.97 0.22 20.9 4,063
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Mobile 0.89 0.75 1.46 8.12 0.02 0.02 0.82 0.84 0.02 0.15 0.17 —2,571 2,571 0.14 0.17 0.26 2,624
Area —1.03 ————————————————
Energy 0.05 0.03 0.49 0.41 < 0.005 0.04 —0.04 0.04 —0.04 —1,007 1,007 0.09 0.01 —1,011
Water ———————————18.7 64.3 83.0 1.92 0.05 —145
Waste ———————————28.2 0.00 28.2 2.82 0.00 —98.6
Refrig.————————————————11.0 11.0
Total 0.95 1.81 1.95 8.53 0.03 0.06 0.82 0.88 0.06 0.15 0.20 46.9 3,642 3,688 4.97 0.22 11.2 3,889
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Mobile 0.65 0.55 1.09 6.18 0.02 0.01 0.60 0.61 0.01 0.11 0.12 —1,898 1,898 0.10 0.12 3.13 1,940
Area 0.22 1.24 0.01 1.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —5.17 5.17 < 0.005 < 0.005 —5.32
Energy 0.05 0.03 0.49 0.41 < 0.005 0.04 —0.04 0.04 —0.04 —1,007 1,007 0.09 0.01 —1,011
Water ———————————18.7 64.3 83.0 1.92 0.05 —145
Waste ———————————28.2 0.00 28.2 2.82 0.00 —98.6
Refrig.————————————————11.0 11.0
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
9 / 32
Total 0.93 1.81 1.58 7.85 0.02 0.05 0.60 0.65 0.05 0.11 0.16 46.9 2,974 3,020 4.93 0.18 14.1 3,210
Annual ——————————————————
Mobile 0.12 0.10 0.20 1.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 0.11 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 —314 314 0.02 0.02 0.52 321
Area 0.04 0.23 < 0.005 0.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —0.86 0.86 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.88
Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.09 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —167 167 0.02 < 0.005 —167
Water ———————————3.10 10.6 13.7 0.32 0.01 —24.0
Waste ———————————4.67 0.00 4.67 0.47 0.00 —16.3
Refrig.————————————————1.82 1.82
Total 0.17 0.33 0.29 1.43 < 0.005 0.01 0.11 0.12 0.01 0.02 0.03 7.76 492 500 0.82 0.03 2.34 532
4. Operations Emissions Details
4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use
4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
General
Light
Industry
0.85 0.77 0.48 9.41 0.02 0.01 0.09 0.10 0.01 0.03 0.04 —1,961 1,961 0.07 0.05 7.75 1,985
User
Defined
Industrial
0.09 0.02 0.89 0.51 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.07 0.01 0.02 0.03 —767 767 0.07 0.12 2.16 806
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
10 / 32
0.000.000.000.000.000.00—0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
Total 0.94 0.79 1.37 9.93 0.03 0.02 0.15 0.17 0.02 0.05 0.07 —2,728 2,728 0.14 0.16 9.91 2,790
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
General
Light
Industry
0.80 0.73 0.54 7.61 0.02 0.01 0.09 0.10 0.01 0.03 0.04 —1,803 1,803 0.07 0.05 0.20 1,821
User
Defined
Industrial
0.09 0.02 0.93 0.52 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.07 0.01 0.02 0.03 —767 767 0.07 0.12 0.06 804
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.89 0.75 1.46 8.12 0.02 0.02 0.15 0.17 0.02 0.05 0.07 —2,571 2,571 0.14 0.17 0.26 2,624
Annual ——————————————————
General
Light
Industry
0.11 0.10 0.07 1.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —221 221 0.01 0.01 0.41 224
User
Defined
Industrial
0.01 < 0.005 0.12 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —92.9 92.9 0.01 0.01 0.11 97.4
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.12 0.10 0.20 1.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 —314 314 0.02 0.02 0.52 321
4.2. Energy
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
11 / 32
4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
General
Light
Industry
————————————384 384 0.04 < 0.005 —387
User
Defined
Industrial
————————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Parking
Lot
————————————42.3 42.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 —42.5
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
————————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ————————————427 427 0.04 < 0.005 —429
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
General
Light
Industry
————————————384 384 0.04 < 0.005 —387
User
Defined
Industrial
————————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Parking
Lot
————————————42.3 42.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 —42.5
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
————————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ————————————427 427 0.04 < 0.005 —429
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
12 / 32
Annual ——————————————————
General
Light
Industry
————————————63.6 63.6 0.01 < 0.005 —64.0
User
Defined
Industrial
————————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Parking
Lot
————————————7.00 7.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —7.04
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
————————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ————————————70.6 70.6 0.01 < 0.005 —71.0
4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
General
Light
Industry
0.05 0.03 0.49 0.41 < 0.005 0.04 —0.04 0.04 —0.04 —580 580 0.05 < 0.005 —581
User
Defined
Industrial
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total 0.05 0.03 0.49 0.41 < 0.005 0.04 —0.04 0.04 —0.04 —580 580 0.05 < 0.005 —581
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
13 / 32
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
General
Light
Industry
0.05 0.03 0.49 0.41 < 0.005 0.04 —0.04 0.04 —0.04 —580 580 0.05 < 0.005 —581
User
Defined
Industrial
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total 0.05 0.03 0.49 0.41 < 0.005 0.04 —0.04 0.04 —0.04 —580 580 0.05 < 0.005 —581
Annual ——————————————————
General
Light
Industry
0.01 < 0.005 0.09 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —96.0 96.0 0.01 < 0.005 —96.3
User
Defined
Industrial
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total 0.01 < 0.005 0.09 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —96.0 96.0 0.01 < 0.005 —96.3
4.3. Area Emissions by Source
4.3.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
14 / 32
Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Consum
er
Products
—0.92 ————————————————
Architect
ural
Coatings
—0.12 ————————————————
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt
0.33 0.30 0.02 1.83 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —7.55 7.55 < 0.005 < 0.005 —7.77
Total 0.33 1.34 0.02 1.83 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —7.55 7.55 < 0.005 < 0.005 —7.77
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Consum
er
Products
—0.92 ————————————————
Architect
ural
Coatings
—0.12 ————————————————
Total —1.03 ————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Consum
er
Products
—0.17 ————————————————
Architect
ural
Coatings
—0.02 ————————————————
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt
0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —0.86 0.86 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.88
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
15 / 32
Total 0.04 0.23 < 0.005 0.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —0.86 0.86 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.88
4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use
4.4.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
General
Light
Industry
———————————18.7 64.3 83.0 1.92 0.05 —145
User
Defined
Industrial
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Parking
Lot
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ———————————18.7 64.3 83.0 1.92 0.05 —145
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
General
Light
Industry
———————————18.7 64.3 83.0 1.92 0.05 —145
User
Defined
Industrial
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Parking
Lot
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
16 / 32
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ———————————18.7 64.3 83.0 1.92 0.05 —145
Annual ——————————————————
General
Light
Industry
———————————3.10 10.6 13.7 0.32 0.01 —24.0
User
Defined
Industrial
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Parking
Lot
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ———————————3.10 10.6 13.7 0.32 0.01 —24.0
4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use
4.5.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
General
Light
Industry
———————————28.2 0.00 28.2 2.82 0.00 —98.6
User
Defined
Industrial
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
17 / 32
Parking
Lot
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ———————————28.2 0.00 28.2 2.82 0.00 —98.6
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
General
Light
Industry
———————————28.2 0.00 28.2 2.82 0.00 —98.6
User
Defined
Industrial
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Parking
Lot
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ———————————28.2 0.00 28.2 2.82 0.00 —98.6
Annual ——————————————————
General
Light
Industry
———————————4.67 0.00 4.67 0.47 0.00 —16.3
User
Defined
Industrial
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Parking
Lot
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ———————————4.67 0.00 4.67 0.47 0.00 —16.3
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
18 / 32
4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use
4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
General
Light
Industry
————————————————11.0 11.0
Total ————————————————11.0 11.0
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
General
Light
Industry
————————————————11.0 11.0
Total ————————————————11.0 11.0
Annual ——————————————————
General
Light
Industry
————————————————1.82 1.82
Total ————————————————1.82 1.82
4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type
4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
19 / 32
CO2eRN2OCH4CO2TNBCO2BCO2PM2.5TPM2.5DPM2.5EPM10TPM10DPM10ESO2CONOxROGTOGEquipme
nt
Type
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type
4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
20 / 32
4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type
4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Vegetatio
n
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
21 / 32
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Avoided ——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
22 / 32
Remove ——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
———————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Avoided ——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Remove
d
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
———————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Avoided ——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Remove
d
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
———————————————————
5. Activity Data
5.9. Operational Mobile Sources
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
23 / 32
5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year
General Light
Industry
196 16.6 6.63 52,311 2,626 222 88.9 700,866
User Defined
Industrial
12.0 1.02 0.41 3,202 258 21.8 8.70 68,816
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.10. Operational Area Sources
5.10.1. Hearths
5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft)Non-Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
0 0.00 63,285 21,095 9,467
5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 250
5.11. Operational Energy Consumption
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
24 / 32
5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr)
Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr)CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr)
General Light Industry 402,397 349 0.0330 0.0040 1,809,365
User Defined Industrial 0.00 349 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Parking Lot 44,264 349 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 349 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption
5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year)Outdoor Water (gal/year)
General Light Industry 9,756,438 163,795
User Defined Industrial 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00
5.13. Operational Waste Generation
5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year)Cogeneration (kWh/year)
General Light Industry 52.3 0.00
User Defined Industrial 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
25 / 32
5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment
5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg)Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced
General Light Industry Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 0.30 4.00 4.00 18.0
5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor
5.16. Stationary Sources
5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor
5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr)Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day)Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)
5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type
——
5.18. Vegetation
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
26 / 32
5.18.1. Land Use Change
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres
5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres
5.18.2. Sequestration
5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year)Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)
6. Climate Risk Detailed Report
6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG
emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.
Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 21.7 annual days of extreme heat
Extreme Precipitation 5.25 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm
Sea Level Rise 0.00 meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 0.00 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed
historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
27 / 32
Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full
day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider different
increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four simulations make
different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature
possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 50 meters (m) by 50 m, or about 164 feet (ft) by 164 ft.
Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate,
vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make
different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature
possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score
Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise N/A N/A N/A N/A
Wildfire N/A N/A N/A N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality N/A N/A N/A N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest
exposure.
The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the
greatest ability to adapt.
The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.
6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score
Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise N/A N/A N/A N/A
Wildfire N/A N/A N/A N/A
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
28 / 32
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality N/A N/A N/A N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest
exposure.
The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the
greatest ability to adapt.
The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.
6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
7. Health and Equity Details
7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.
Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 97.0
AQ-PM 91.2
AQ-DPM 44.6
Drinking Water 66.7
Lead Risk Housing 17.7
Pesticides 0.00
Toxic Releases 70.1
Traffic 22.7
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 0.00
Groundwater 0.00
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
29 / 32
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 87.1
Impaired Water Bodies 0.00
Solid Waste 0.00
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 35.5
Cardio-vascular 74.9
Low Birth Weights 90.0
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 67.1
Housing 32.3
Linguistic 42.1
Poverty 46.6
Unemployment 60.6
7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.
Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 73.87398948
Employed 66.08494803
Median HI 76.97934043
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 33.61991531
High school enrollment 16.64314128
Preschool enrollment 6.954959579
Transportation —
Auto Access 81.29090209
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
30 / 32
Active commuting 28.82073656
Social —
2-parent households 63.10791736
Voting 37.89298088
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 69.81906839
Park access 24.90696779
Retail density 29.59065828
Supermarket access 48.50506865
Tree canopy 11.20236109
Housing —
Homeownership 87.77107661
Housing habitability 74.22045425
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 66.09778006
Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 33.49159502
Uncrowded housing 67.80443988
Health Outcomes —
Insured adults 47.32452201
Arthritis 87.4
Asthma ER Admissions 59.8
High Blood Pressure 83.5
Cancer (excluding skin)80.0
Asthma 58.2
Coronary Heart Disease 90.3
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 88.0
Diagnosed Diabetes 65.9
Life Expectancy at Birth 84.7
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
31 / 32
Cognitively Disabled 85.7
Physically Disabled 88.8
Heart Attack ER Admissions 27.3
Mental Health Not Good 56.0
Chronic Kidney Disease 79.8
Obesity 44.4
Pedestrian Injuries 39.5
Physical Health Not Good 65.0
Stroke 88.3
Health Risk Behaviors —
Binge Drinking 15.4
Current Smoker 63.1
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 61.9
Climate Change Exposures —
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 45.9
Elderly 96.3
English Speaking 60.3
Foreign-born 41.2
Outdoor Workers 55.6
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 52.6
Traffic Density 33.7
Traffic Access 23.0
Other Indices —
Hardship 49.3
Beech Logistics Center (General Light Industrial Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
32 / 32
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 49.9
7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a)58.0
Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b)51.0
Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535)No
Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550)No
Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617)No
a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.
b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.
7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.
7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.
7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.
8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Total Project area is 8.43 acres
Operations: Vehicle Data Trip characteristics based on information provided in the Traffic analysis
Operations: Fleet Mix Passenger Car Mix estimated based on the CalEEMod default fleet mix and the ratio of the vehicle
classes (LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV, & MCY). Truck Mix based on information in the Traffic analysis
Operations: Energy Use Natural gas will not be used as part of the Project
Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
1 / 31
Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations) Detailed Report
Table of Contents
1. Basic Project Information
1.1. Basic Project Information
1.2. Land Use Types
1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector
2. Emissions Summary
2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
4. Operations Emissions Details
4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use
4.1.1. Unmitigated
4.2. Energy
4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
4.3. Area Emissions by Source
Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
2 / 31
4.3.2. Unmitigated
4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use
4.4.2. Unmitigated
4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use
4.5.2. Unmitigated
4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use
4.6.1. Unmitigated
4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type
4.7.1. Unmitigated
4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type
4.8.1. Unmitigated
4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type
4.9.1. Unmitigated
4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated
4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated
4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated
Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
3 / 31
5. Activity Data
5.9. Operational Mobile Sources
5.9.1. Unmitigated
5.10. Operational Area Sources
5.10.1. Hearths
5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
5.11. Operational Energy Consumption
5.11.1. Unmitigated
5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption
5.12.1. Unmitigated
5.13. Operational Waste Generation
5.13.1. Unmitigated
5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment
5.14.1. Unmitigated
5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
4 / 31
5.15.1. Unmitigated
5.16. Stationary Sources
5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
5.16.2. Process Boilers
5.17. User Defined
5.18. Vegetation
5.18.1. Land Use Change
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
5.18.2. Sequestration
5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
6. Climate Risk Detailed Report
6.1. Climate Risk Summary
6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
5 / 31
7. Health and Equity Details
7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
7.4. Health & Equity Measures
7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
8. User Changes to Default Data
Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
6 / 31
1. Basic Project Information
1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations)
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s)2.80
Precipitation (days)6.40
Location 34.108970164547955, -117.47238518529332
County San Bernardino-South Coast
City Fontana
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5304
EDFZ 10
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft)Landscape Area (sq
ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
127 1000sqft 3.61 126,569 30,599 0.00 ——
User Defined
Industrial
127 User Defined Unit 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ——
Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
7 / 31
1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector
No measures selected
2. Emissions Summary
2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Un/Mit.TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.2.20 4.65 6.42 15.9 0.06 0.13 1.23 1.37 0.13 0.26 0.39 120 7,645 7,765 12.7 0.89 148 8,496
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.1.19 3.72 6.65 9.11 0.06 0.13 1.23 1.36 0.12 0.26 0.38 120 7,511 7,631 12.7 0.89 130 8,344
Average
Daily
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.1.56 4.16 5.11 10.7 0.04 0.11 0.90 1.01 0.11 0.19 0.30 120 5,929 6,049 12.6 0.69 135 6,706
Annual
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.0.28 0.76 0.93 1.96 0.01 0.02 0.16 0.18 0.02 0.03 0.05 19.9 982 1,002 2.09 0.11 22.4 1,110
2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
8 / 31
Mobile 1.15 0.69 5.72 9.85 0.06 0.08 1.23 1.31 0.07 0.26 0.33 —6,100 6,100 0.45 0.74 19.3 6,350
Area 0.98 3.93 0.05 5.50 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —22.6 22.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 —23.3
Energy 0.07 0.04 0.65 0.54 < 0.005 0.05 —0.05 0.05 —0.05 —1,330 1,330 0.12 0.01 —1,335
Water ———————————56.1 193 249 5.77 0.14 —434
Waste ———————————64.1 0.00 64.1 6.41 0.00 —224
Refrig.————————————————129 129
Total 2.20 4.65 6.42 15.9 0.06 0.13 1.23 1.37 0.13 0.26 0.39 120 7,645 7,765 12.7 0.89 148 8,496
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Mobile 1.12 0.65 6.00 8.57 0.06 0.08 1.23 1.31 0.07 0.26 0.33 —5,988 5,988 0.45 0.74 0.50 6,221
Area —3.03 ————————————————
Energy 0.07 0.04 0.65 0.54 < 0.005 0.05 —0.05 0.05 —0.05 —1,330 1,330 0.12 0.01 —1,335
Water ———————————56.1 193 249 5.77 0.14 —434
Waste ———————————64.1 0.00 64.1 6.41 0.00 —224
Refrig.————————————————129 129
Total 1.19 3.72 6.65 9.11 0.06 0.13 1.23 1.36 0.12 0.26 0.38 120 7,511 7,631 12.7 0.89 130 8,344
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Mobile 0.81 0.48 4.44 6.43 0.04 0.06 0.90 0.96 0.05 0.19 0.24 —4,391 4,391 0.33 0.54 6.08 4,567
Area 0.67 3.65 0.03 3.77 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —15.5 15.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 —16.0
Energy 0.07 0.04 0.65 0.54 < 0.005 0.05 —0.05 0.05 —0.05 —1,330 1,330 0.12 0.01 —1,335
Water ———————————56.1 193 249 5.77 0.14 —434
Waste ———————————64.1 0.00 64.1 6.41 0.00 —224
Refrig.————————————————129 129
Total 1.56 4.16 5.11 10.7 0.04 0.11 0.90 1.01 0.11 0.19 0.30 120 5,929 6,049 12.6 0.69 135 6,706
Annual ——————————————————
Mobile 0.15 0.09 0.81 1.17 0.01 0.01 0.16 0.17 0.01 0.03 0.04 —727 727 0.05 0.09 1.01 756
Area 0.12 0.67 0.01 0.69 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —2.57 2.57 < 0.005 < 0.005 —2.64
Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
9 / 31
Energy 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.10 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —220 220 0.02 < 0.005 —221
Water ———————————9.29 31.9 41.2 0.96 0.02 —71.9
Waste ———————————10.6 0.00 10.6 1.06 0.00 —37.1
Refrig.————————————————21.4 21.4
Total 0.28 0.76 0.93 1.96 0.01 0.02 0.16 0.18 0.02 0.03 0.05 19.9 982 1,002 2.09 0.11 22.4 1,110
4. Operations Emissions Details
4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use
4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
0.60 0.55 0.35 6.72 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.07 0.01 0.02 0.03 —1,401 1,401 0.05 0.03 5.53 1,418
User
Defined
Industrial
0.55 0.13 5.38 3.12 0.04 0.07 0.36 0.43 0.07 0.12 0.18 —4,700 4,700 0.40 0.70 13.7 4,933
Total 1.15 0.69 5.72 9.85 0.06 0.08 0.42 0.50 0.07 0.14 0.21 —6,100 6,100 0.45 0.74 19.3 6,350
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
10 / 31
1,3000.140.040.051,2881,288—0.030.020.010.070.070.010.015.440.380.520.57Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
User
Defined
Industrial
0.54 0.13 5.62 3.13 0.04 0.07 0.36 0.43 0.07 0.12 0.18 —4,700 4,700 0.40 0.70 0.36 4,920
Total 1.12 0.65 6.00 8.57 0.06 0.08 0.42 0.50 0.07 0.14 0.21 —5,988 5,988 0.45 0.74 0.50 6,221
Annual ——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
0.08 0.07 0.05 0.76 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —158 158 0.01 < 0.005 0.29 160
User
Defined
Industrial
0.07 0.02 0.76 0.42 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.02 —569 569 0.05 0.09 0.72 596
Total 0.15 0.09 0.81 1.17 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.07 0.01 0.02 0.03 —727 727 0.05 0.09 1.01 756
4.2. Energy
4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
————————————558 558 0.05 0.01 —562
Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
11 / 31
0.00—0.000.000.000.00————————————User
Defined
Industrial
Total ————————————558 558 0.05 0.01 —562
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
————————————558 558 0.05 0.01 —562
User
Defined
Industrial
————————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ————————————558 558 0.05 0.01 —562
Annual ——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
————————————92.4 92.4 0.01 < 0.005 —93.0
User
Defined
Industrial
————————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ————————————92.4 92.4 0.01 < 0.005 —93.0
4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
12 / 31
Unrefrige
Warehouse-No
Rail
0.07 0.04 0.65 0.54 < 0.005 0.05 —0.05 0.05 —0.05 —771 771 0.07 < 0.005 —773
User
Defined
Industrial
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total 0.07 0.04 0.65 0.54 < 0.005 0.05 —0.05 0.05 —0.05 —771 771 0.07 < 0.005 —773
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
0.07 0.04 0.65 0.54 < 0.005 0.05 —0.05 0.05 —0.05 —771 771 0.07 < 0.005 —773
User
Defined
Industrial
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total 0.07 0.04 0.65 0.54 < 0.005 0.05 —0.05 0.05 —0.05 —771 771 0.07 < 0.005 —773
Annual ——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
0.01 0.01 0.12 0.10 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —128 128 0.01 < 0.005 —128
User
Defined
Industrial
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.10 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —128 128 0.01 < 0.005 —128
4.3. Area Emissions by Source
4.3.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
13 / 31
Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Consum
er
Products
—2.71 ————————————————
Architect
ural
Coatings
—0.32 ————————————————
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt
0.98 0.90 0.05 5.50 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —22.6 22.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 —23.3
Total 0.98 3.93 0.05 5.50 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —22.6 22.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 —23.3
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Consum
er
Products
—2.71 ————————————————
Architect
ural
Coatings
—0.32 ————————————————
Total —3.03 ————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Consum
er
Products
—0.49 ————————————————
Architect
ural
Coatings
—0.06 ————————————————
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt
0.12 0.11 0.01 0.69 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —2.57 2.57 < 0.005 < 0.005 —2.64
Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
14 / 31
Total 0.12 0.67 0.01 0.69 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —2.57 2.57 < 0.005 < 0.005 —2.64
4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use
4.4.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
———————————56.1 193 249 5.77 0.14 —434
User
Defined
Industrial
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ———————————56.1 193 249 5.77 0.14 —434
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
———————————56.1 193 249 5.77 0.14 —434
User
Defined
Industrial
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ———————————56.1 193 249 5.77 0.14 —434
Annual ——————————————————
Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
15 / 31
71.9—0.020.9641.231.99.29———————————Unrefrige
rated
User
Defined
Industrial
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ———————————9.29 31.9 41.2 0.96 0.02 —71.9
4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use
4.5.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
———————————64.1 0.00 64.1 6.41 0.00 —224
User
Defined
Industrial
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ———————————64.1 0.00 64.1 6.41 0.00 —224
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
———————————64.1 0.00 64.1 6.41 0.00 —224
Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
16 / 31
0.00—0.000.000.000.000.00———————————User
Defined
Industrial
Total ———————————64.1 0.00 64.1 6.41 0.00 —224
Annual ——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
———————————10.6 0.00 10.6 1.06 0.00 —37.1
User
Defined
Industrial
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ———————————10.6 0.00 10.6 1.06 0.00 —37.1
4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use
4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
————————————————129 129
Total ————————————————129 129
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
17 / 31
129129————————————————Unrefrige
rated
Total ————————————————129 129
Annual ——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
————————————————21.4 21.4
Total ————————————————21.4 21.4
4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type
4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type
Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
18 / 31
4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type
4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
19 / 31
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Vegetatio
n
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
20 / 31
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Avoided ——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Remove
d
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
———————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Avoided ——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Remove
d
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
21 / 31
———————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Avoided ——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Remove
d
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
———————————————————
5. Activity Data
5.9. Operational Mobile Sources
5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
140 11.8 4.73 37,364 1,876 159 63.4 500,606
User Defined
Industrial
78.0 6.59 2.65 20,819 1,615 137 54.8 430,965
5.10. Operational Area Sources
5.10.1. Hearths
5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
22 / 31
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft)Non-Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
0 0.00 189,854 63,285 —
5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 250
5.11. Operational Energy Consumption
5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr)
Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr)CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr)
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail
584,585 349 0.0330 0.0040 2,406,163
User Defined Industrial 0.00 349 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption
5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year)Outdoor Water (gal/year)
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 29,269,081 491,385
User Defined Industrial 0.00 0.00
5.13. Operational Waste Generation
5.13.1. Unmitigated
Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
23 / 31
Land Use Waste (ton/year)Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 119 0.00
User Defined Industrial 0.00 0.00
5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment
5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg)Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
Cold storage User Defined 150 7.50 7.50 7.50 25.0
5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor
5.16. Stationary Sources
5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor
5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr)Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day)Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)
5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type
Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
24 / 31
——
5.18. Vegetation
5.18.1. Land Use Change
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres
5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres
5.18.2. Sequestration
5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year)Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)
6. Climate Risk Detailed Report
6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG
emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.
Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 21.7 annual days of extreme heat
Extreme Precipitation 5.25 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm
Sea Level Rise 0.00 meters of inundation depth
Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
25 / 31
Wildfire 0.00 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed
historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full
day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider different
increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four simulations make
different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature
possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 50 meters (m) by 50 m, or about 164 feet (ft) by 164 ft.
Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate,
vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make
different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature
possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score
Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise N/A N/A N/A N/A
Wildfire N/A N/A N/A N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality N/A N/A N/A N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest
exposure.
The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the
greatest ability to adapt.
The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.
6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score
Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
26 / 31
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise N/A N/A N/A N/A
Wildfire N/A N/A N/A N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality N/A N/A N/A N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest
exposure.
The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the
greatest ability to adapt.
The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.
6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
7. Health and Equity Details
7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.
Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 97.0
AQ-PM 91.2
AQ-DPM 44.6
Drinking Water 66.7
Lead Risk Housing 17.7
Pesticides 0.00
Toxic Releases 70.1
Traffic 22.7
Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
27 / 31
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 0.00
Groundwater 0.00
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 87.1
Impaired Water Bodies 0.00
Solid Waste 0.00
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 35.5
Cardio-vascular 74.9
Low Birth Weights 90.0
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 67.1
Housing 32.3
Linguistic 42.1
Poverty 46.6
Unemployment 60.6
7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.
Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 73.87398948
Employed 66.08494803
Median HI 76.97934043
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 33.61991531
High school enrollment 16.64314128
Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
28 / 31
Preschool enrollment 6.954959579
Transportation —
Auto Access 81.29090209
Active commuting 28.82073656
Social —
2-parent households 63.10791736
Voting 37.89298088
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 69.81906839
Park access 24.90696779
Retail density 29.59065828
Supermarket access 48.50506865
Tree canopy 11.20236109
Housing —
Homeownership 87.77107661
Housing habitability 74.22045425
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 66.09778006
Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 33.49159502
Uncrowded housing 67.80443988
Health Outcomes —
Insured adults 47.32452201
Arthritis 87.4
Asthma ER Admissions 59.8
High Blood Pressure 83.5
Cancer (excluding skin)80.0
Asthma 58.2
Coronary Heart Disease 90.3
Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
29 / 31
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 88.0
Diagnosed Diabetes 65.9
Life Expectancy at Birth 84.7
Cognitively Disabled 85.7
Physically Disabled 88.8
Heart Attack ER Admissions 27.3
Mental Health Not Good 56.0
Chronic Kidney Disease 79.8
Obesity 44.4
Pedestrian Injuries 39.5
Physical Health Not Good 65.0
Stroke 88.3
Health Risk Behaviors —
Binge Drinking 15.4
Current Smoker 63.1
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 61.9
Climate Change Exposures —
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 45.9
Elderly 96.3
English Speaking 60.3
Foreign-born 41.2
Outdoor Workers 55.6
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 52.6
Traffic Density 33.7
Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
30 / 31
Traffic Access 23.0
Other Indices —
Hardship 49.3
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 49.9
7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a)58.0
Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b)51.0
Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535)No
Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550)No
Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617)No
a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.
b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.
7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.
7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.
7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.
8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Total Project area (warehouse only) is 3.61 acres
Operations: Vehicle Data Trip characteristics based on information provided in the Traffic analysis
Beech Logistics Center (Warehouse Operations) Detailed Report, 11/15/2022
31 / 31
Operations: Fleet Mix Passenger Car Mix estimated based on the CalEEMod default fleet mix and the ratio of the vehicle
classes (LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV, & MCY). Truck Mix based on information in the Traffic analysis
Operations: Energy Use No natural gas
Operations: Refrigerants Per 17 CCR 95371, new refrigeration equipment containing >50 lbs of refrigerant in new facilities is
prohibited from utilizing refrigerants with a GWP of 150 or greater as of 1 Jan 2022
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
This page intentionally left blank
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
APPENDIX 4.3:
EMFAC2021
Source: EMFAC2021 (v1.0.2) Emissions Inventory
Region Type: Sub-Area
Region: San Bernardino (SC)
Calendar Year: 2023
Season: Annual
Vehicle Classification: EMFAC2007 Categories
Units: miles/year for CVMT and EVMT, trips/year for Trips, kWh/year for Energy Consumption, tons/year for Emissions, 1000 gallons/year for Fuel Consumption
Region CalYr VehClass MdlYr Speed Fuel Population VMT Fuel_Consumption Fuel_Consumption Total Fuel VMT Total VMT Miles per Gallon Vehicle Class
San Bernardino (SC)2023 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 7.139920774 72989.87996 20.21856385 20218.56385 99151757.36 72989.87996 589074824.8 5.94 HHDT
San Bernardino (SC)2023 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 13684.27912 540336552.4 91207.74228 91207742.28 540336552.4
San Bernardino (SC)2023 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 11.071794 215446.3538 0 0 215446.3538
San Bernardino (SC)2023 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 2370.144029 48449836.15 7923.79652 7923796.52 48449836.15
San Bernardino (SC)2023 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 461483.7292 7017524717 240236.635 240236635 244016564.2 7017524717 7487517958 30.68 LDA
San Bernardino (SC)2023 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1109.597168 14054225.57 328.8623383 328862.3383 14054225.57
San Bernardino (SC)2023 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 15706.1209 253061679.4 0 0 253061679.4
San Bernardino (SC)2023 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 11324.38067 202877335.8 3451.066904 3451066.904 202877335.8
San Bernardino (SC)2023 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 41702.74967 497957156.2 20670.57095 20670570.95 20682315.81 497957156.2 499223706.1 24.14 LDT1
San Bernardino (SC)2023 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 11.94633759 62720.48759 2.576524841 2576.524841 62720.48759
San Bernardino (SC)2023 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 40.25061846 615040.0246 0 0 615040.0246
San Bernardino (SC)2023 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 32.95928492 588789.4236 9.168334976 9168.334976 588789.4236
San Bernardino (SC)2023 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 187695.2776 2666362554 113026.4187 113026418.7 113612136.3 2666362554 2706014469 23.82 LDT2
San Bernardino (SC)2023 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 481.5963709 7444176.325 228.9034375 228903.4375 7444176.325
San Bernardino (SC)2023 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 809.1431596 10220716.39 0 0 10220716.39
San Bernardino (SC)2023 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 1266.994818 21987022.61 356.8141273 356814.1273 21987022.61
San Bernardino (SC)2023 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 17369.10468 208190922.4 15725.14829 15725148.29 22649955.03 208190922.4 350031821.2 15.45 LHDT1
San Bernardino (SC)2023 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 11340.4221 141840898.9 6924.806743 6924806.743 141840898.9
San Bernardino (SC)2023 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2940.213764 34218739.32 2893.121173 2893121.173 6421373.81 34218739.32 94438257.25 14.71 LHDT2
San Bernardino (SC)2023 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4748.518724 60219517.93 3528.252637 3528252.637 60219517.93
San Bernardino (SC)2023 MCY Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 20689.98168 42836654.11 1024.529799 1024529.799 1024529.799 42836654.11 42836654.11 41.81 MCY
San Bernardino (SC)2023 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 147303.3129 2011093605 104722.9308 104722930.8 106121590.4 2011093605 2063737500 19.45 MDV
San Bernardino (SC)2023 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1912.856517 27101379.22 1153.981539 1153981.539 27101379.22
San Bernardino (SC)2023 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 883.4710394 11157327.81 0 0 11157327.81
San Bernardino (SC)2023 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 823.221551 14385188.28 244.6781301 244678.1301 14385188.28
San Bernardino (SC)2023 MH Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 3595.119651 10460741.91 2131.45052 2131450.52 2521132.488 10460741.91 14451897.96 5.73 MH
San Bernardino (SC)2023 MH Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1340.055605 3991156.05 389.6819685 389681.9685 3991156.05
San Bernardino (SC)2023 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1500.364507 26043135.77 5038.733349 5038733.349 27656121.37 26043135.77 228746120.4 8.27 MHDT
San Bernardino (SC)2023 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 14608.25407 199805820.7 22288.42278 22288422.78 199805820.7
San Bernardino (SC)2023 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 9.224784632 63608.15122 0 0 63608.15122
San Bernardino (SC)2023 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 184.1702325 2833555.784 328.9652465 328965.2465 2833555.784
San Bernardino (SC)2023 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 384.9686335 5415956.324 1063.297516 1063297.516 1724023.258 5415956.324 10403786.09 6.03 OBUS
San Bernardino (SC)2023 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 208.3404962 4425212.016 597.3315243 597331.5243 4425212.016
San Bernardino (SC)2023 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 31.52138873 562617.7521 63.3942171 63394.2171 562617.7521
San Bernardino (SC)2023 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 294.5939953 4514535.962 505.0559552 505055.9552 1611072.188 4514535.962 10332913.93 6.41 SBUS
San Bernardino (SC)2023 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 382.1050011 2616781.695 356.3903036 356390.3036 2616781.695
San Bernardino (SC)2023 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 0.69336851 2637.406802 0 0 2637.406802
San Bernardino (SC)2023 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 385.616886 3198958.869 749.6259288 749625.9288 3198958.869
San Bernardino (SC)2023 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 54.60967225 1714542.424 140.3696548 140369.6548 2776335.306 1714542.424 13093887.88 4.72 UBUS
San Bernardino (SC)2023 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4.556959009 147096.8417 14.11747797 14117.47797 147096.8417
San Bernardino (SC)2023 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 0.433186591 14102.7389 0 0 14102.7389
San Bernardino (SC)2023 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 249.7401785 11218145.87 2621.848173 2621848.173 11218145.87
Source: EMFAC2021 (v1.0.2) Emissions Inventory
Region Type: Sub-Area
Region: San Bernardino (SC)
Calendar Year: 2024
Season: Annual
Vehicle Classification: EMFAC2007 Categories
Units: miles/year for CVMT and EVMT, trips/year for Trips, kWh/year for Energy Consumption, tons/year for Emissions, 1000 gallons/year for Fuel Consumption
Region CalYr VehClass MdlYr Speed Fuel Population VMT Fuel_Consumption Fuel_Consumption Total Fuel VMT Total VMT Miles per Gallon Vehicle Class
San Bernardino (SC)2024 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 5.565987525 65632.20065 17.55506745 17555.06745 100020707.1 65632.20065 602650321.4 6.03 HHDT
San Bernardino (SC)2024 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 14231.95658 551042326.4 92002.9329 92002932.9 551042326.4
San Bernardino (SC)2024 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 48.62871821 1514395.863 0 0 1514395.863
San Bernardino (SC)2024 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 2469.470738 50027966.96 8000.219124 8000219.124 50027966.96
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 459317.1397 6998203711 235268.3364 235268336.4 239249877 6998203711 7553967064 31.57 LDA
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1047.589492 13077704.42 304.6940031 304694.0031 13077704.42
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 19287.2826 319989461.8 0 0 319989461.8
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 12500.45848 222696187.4 3676.846561 3676846.561 222696187.4
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 40725.35771 490115573.8 19992.18901 19992189.01 20008289.61 490115573.8 492044217.3 24.59 LDT1
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 10.72175816 55107.22369 2.270239442 2270.239442 55107.22369
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 58.29951204 952224.2422 0 0 952224.2422
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 51.79076029 921312.0144 13.83036618 13830.36618 921312.0144
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 192654.7494 2757561092 113913.4167 113913416.7 114588210.3 2757561092 2808082925 24.51 LDT2
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 520.896721 8078084.967 243.685157 243685.157 8078084.967
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 1199.246991 15005145.59 0 0 15005145.59
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 1594.625518 27438602.16 431.1084869 431108.4869 27438602.16
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 17179.49082 208481689.1 15346.53488 15346534.88 22275281.21 208481689.1 352257356.3 15.81 LHDT1
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 11382.09786 142493007.5 6928.746332 6928746.332 142493007.5
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 52.7403112 1282659.757 0 0 1282659.757
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2883.702401 33531637.34 2787.053647 2787053.647 6339312.387 33531637.34 94885856.62 14.97 LHDT2
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4825.532255 61039665.72 3552.258741 3552258.741 61039665.72
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 13.65084178 314553.5538 0 0 314553.5538
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MCY Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 20751.92893 42918713.78 1022.38967 1022389.67 1022389.67 42918713.78 42918713.78 41.98 MCY
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 147141.1277 2023247300 102986.2138 102986213.8 104408638.9 2023247300 2084683084 19.97 MDV
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1910.88318 26864024.48 1129.452064 1129452.064 26864024.48
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 1327.48959 16604056.61 0 0 16604056.61
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 1028.690257 17967703.21 292.9729803 292972.9803 17967703.21
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MH Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 3401.970527 9880592.437 2022.448199 2022448.199 2408282.462 9880592.437 13826961.78 5.74 MH
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MH Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1336.39751 3946369.345 385.834263 385834.263 3946369.345
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1460.602089 25635396.94 4923.389143 4923389.143 27935606.17 25635396.94 232314319.3 8.32 MHDT
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 14946.4736 202976493.9 22669.39063 22669390.63 202976493.9
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 46.13645649 737631.427 0 0 737631.427
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 195.6757264 2964797.055 342.8264 342826.4 2964797.055
San Bernardino (SC)2024 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 370.0192137 5168863.655 1012.113043 1012113.043 1678725.582 5168863.655 10209810.25 6.08 OBUS
San Bernardino (SC)2024 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 210.5519789 4437514.629 600.0645542 600064.5542 4437514.629
San Bernardino (SC)2024 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 0.809761934 21328.84548 0 0 21328.84548
San Bernardino (SC)2024 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 32.78528924 582103.1254 66.54798496 66547.98496 582103.1254
San Bernardino (SC)2024 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 297.8692006 4585227.496 511.4311108 511431.1108 1619236.79 4585227.496 10410441.24 6.43 SBUS
San Bernardino (SC)2024 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 373.2941498 2533365.656 344.1451415 344145.1415 2533365.656
San Bernardino (SC)2024 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 2.213199982 18416.70512 0 0 18416.70512
San Bernardino (SC)2024 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 398.7600331 3273431.384 763.6605376 763660.5376 3273431.384
San Bernardino (SC)2024 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 54.72012078 1718010.1 132.909217 132909.217 2702138.875 1718010.1 13120370.38 4.86 UBUS
San Bernardino (SC)2024 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4.556959009 147096.8417 14.21429006 14214.29006 147096.8417
San Bernardino (SC)2024 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 7.328344802 363414.4038 0 0 363414.4038
San Bernardino (SC)2024 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 243.3602145 10891849.03 2555.015368 2555015.368 10891849.03
Beech Logistics Center Energy Analysis
14726-02 EA Report
This page intentionally left blank