HomeMy WebLinkAboutAppendix M - Noise Impact Analysis
Southridge Fontana
(PAM21-0081)
NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS
CITY OF FONTANA
Prepared by:
William Maddux
bmaddux@urbanxroads.com
(619) 778-1971
November 18, 2022
14713-05 Noise Study
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................. I
APPENDICES ......................................................................................................................................... II
LIST OF EXHIBITS ................................................................................................................................. III
LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................... III
LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS ............................................................................................................. IV
1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Site Location .................................................................................................................................. 1
1.2 Project Description ........................................................................................................................ 1
2 FUNDAMENTALS ......................................................................................................................... 5
2.1 Range of Noise .............................................................................................................................. 5
2.2 Noise Descriptors .......................................................................................................................... 6
2.3 Sound Propagation ........................................................................................................................ 6
2.4 Noise Control ................................................................................................................................ 7
2.5 Noise Barrier Attenuation ............................................................................................................. 7
2.6 Land Use Compatibility With Noise .............................................................................................. 7
2.7 Community Response to Noise ..................................................................................................... 8
2.8 Vibration ....................................................................................................................................... 8
2.9 Blasting .......................................................................................................................................... 9
3 REGULATORY SETTING .............................................................................................................. 13
3.1 State of California Noise Requirements ...................................................................................... 13
3.2 State of California Building Standards Code ............................................................................... 13
3.3 City of Fontana General Plan Noise Element .............................................................................. 14
3.4 Operational Noise Standards ...................................................................................................... 15
3.5 Construction Noise Standards..................................................................................................... 15
3.6 Construction Vibration Standards ............................................................................................... 16
3.7 Airport Land Use Compatibility ................................................................................................... 16
3.8 Blasting Standards ....................................................................................................................... 16
4 SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA ............................................................................................................ 19
4.1 CEQA Guidelines Not Further Analyzed ...................................................................................... 19
4.2 Significance Criteria Summary .................................................................................................... 19
5 EXISTING NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS ................................................................................... 23
5.1 Measurement Procedure and Criteria ........................................................................................ 23
5.2 Noise Measurement Locations ................................................................................................... 23
5.3 Noise Measurement Results ....................................................................................................... 24
6 METHODS AND PROCEDURES.................................................................................................... 27
6.1 FHWA Traffic Noise Prediction Model ........................................................................................ 27
6.2 On-Site Traffic Noise Prediction Model Inputs ........................................................................... 27
6.3 Off-Site Traffic Noise Prediction Model Inputs ........................................................................... 28
7 ON-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS .............................................................................................. 31
7.1 On-Site Exterior Noise Analysis ................................................................................................... 31
7.2 On-Site Interior Noise Analysis ................................................................................................... 31
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
ii
8 OFF-SITE TRANSPORTATION NOISE IMPACTS ............................................................................ 35
8.1 Traffic Noise Contours ................................................................................................................ 35
8.2 Existing Project Traffic Noise Levels ............................................................................................ 37
8.3 EACP Traffic Noise Level Increases .............................................................................................. 37
9 RECEIVER LOCATIONS................................................................................................................ 41
10 OPERATIONAL NOISE ANALYSIS ................................................................................................ 43
10.1 Operational Noise Sources .......................................................................................................... 43
10.2 Reference Noise Levels ............................................................................................................... 45
10.3 CadnaA Noise Prediction Model ................................................................................................. 45
10.4 Project Operational Noise Levels ................................................................................................ 46
10.5 Project Operational Noise Level Compliance .............................................................................. 46
10.6 Project Operational Noise Level Increases ................................................................................. 47
11 CONSTRUCTION ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................ 51
11.1 Typical Construction Noise Levels ............................................................................................... 51
11.2 Typical Construction Reference Noise Levels ............................................................................. 51
11.3 Typical Construction Noise Analysis............................................................................................ 55
11.4 Typical Construction Noise Level Compliance ............................................................................ 55
11.5 Rock Crushing Construction Reference Noise Levels .................................................................. 56
11.6 Rock Crushing Construction Noise Analysis and Compliance ..................................................... 57
11.7 Construction Vibration Analysis .................................................................................................. 58
11.8 Blasting Noise and Vibration Impacts ......................................................................................... 59
12 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................. 63
13 CERTIFICATION .......................................................................................................................... 65
APPENDICES
APPENDIX 3.1: CITY OF FONTANA MUNICIPAL CODE
APPENDIX 5.1: NOISE MEASUREMENT PHOTOS
APPENDIX 5.2: NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENT WORKSHEETS
APPENDIX 7.1: ON-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE WORKSHEETS
APPENDIX 8.1: OFF-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE WORKSHEETS
APPENDIX 10.1: OPERATIONAL MODEL
APPENDIX 11.1: CONSTRUCTION NOISE MODEL
APPENDIX 11.2: ROCK CRUSHER NOISE MODEL
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
iii
LIST OF EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT 1-A: LOCATION MAP .............................................................................................................. 2
EXHIBIT 1-B: PROJECT SITE PLAN .......................................................................................................... 3
EXHIBIT 2-A: TYPICAL NOISE LEVELS .................................................................................................... 5
EXHIBIT 2-B: NOISE LEVEL INCREASE PERCEPTION ............................................................................... 8
EXHIBIT 2-C: TYPICAL LEVELS OF GROUND-BORNE VIBRATION .......................................................... 10
EXHIBIT 3-A: LA/ONT FUTURE AIRPORT NOISE CONTOURS ................................................................ 17
EXHIBIT 5-A: NOISE MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS ............................................................................... 25
EXHIBIT 9-A: RECEIVER LOCATIONS ................................................................................................... 42
EXHIBIT 10-A: OPERATIONAL NOISE SOURCE LOCATIONS .................................................................. 44
EXHIBIT 11-A: CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND RECEIVER LOCATIONS .............................................. 52
EXHIBIT 11-B: ROCK CRUSHING ACTIVITY AND RECEIVER LOCATIONS ................................................ 53
EXHIBIT 11-C: BLASTING ACTIVITY AND RECEIVER LOCATIONS........................................................... 54
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1-1: SVSP CAPACITIES AT BUILDOUT .......................................................................................... 1
TABLE 3-1: OPERATIONAL NOISE STANDARDS ................................................................................... 15
TABLE 4-1: SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA SUMMARY .................................................................................. 21
TABLE 5-1: 24-HOUR AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS .......................................................... 24
TABLE 6-1: ON-SITE ROADWAY PARAMETERS ................................................................................... 27
TABLE 6-2: TIME OF DAY VEHICLE SPLITS ........................................................................................... 28
TABLE 6-3: DISTRIBUTION OF TRAFFIC FLOW BY VEHICLE TYPE (VEHICLE MIX) ................................... 28
TABLE 6-4: OFF-SITE ROADWAY PARAMETERS................................................................................... 29
TABLE 6-5: AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES ................................................................................. 29
TABLE 7-1: EXTERIOR NOISE LEVELS (CNEL) ....................................................................................... 31
TABLE 7-2: FIRST FLOOR INTERIOR NOISE IMPACTS (CNEL) ................................................................ 32
TABLE 7-3: SECOND FLOOR INTERIOR NOISE IMPACTS (CNEL) ........................................................... 33
TABLE 7-4: THIRD FLOOR INTERIOR NOISE IMPACTS (CNEL) ............................................................... 33
TABLE 8-1: EXISTING WITHOUT PROJECT NOISE CONTOURS .............................................................. 35
TABLE 8-2: EXISTING WITH PROJECT NOISE CONTOURS ..................................................................... 36
TABLE 8-3: EAC YEAR 2027 NOISE CONTOURS ................................................................................... 36
TABLE 8-4: EACP YEAR 2027 NOISE CONTOURS ................................................................................. 37
TABLE 8-5: EXISTING WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC NOISE INCREASES ........................................................ 38
TABLE 8-6: EAC WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC NOISE INCREASES ................................................................ 39
TABLE 10-1: REFERENCE NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS ..................................................................... 45
TABLE 10-2: DAYTIME PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVELS ............................................................. 46
TABLE 10-3: NIGHTTIME PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVELS ......................................................... 46
TABLE 10-4: OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL COMPLIANCE ...................................................................... 47
TABLE 10-5: DAYTIME PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL INCREASES ............................................ 48
TABLE 10-6: NIGHTTIME OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL INCREASES ....................................................... 49
TABLE 11-1: TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION REFERENCE NOISE LEVELS ....................................................... 55
TABLE 11-2: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT NOISE LEVEL SUMMARY ................................................... 56
TABLE 11-3: TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVEL COMPLIANCE ...................................................... 56
TABLE 11-4: ROCK CRUSHING CONSTRUCTION REFERENCE NOISE LEVELS .......................................... 57
TABLE 11-5: ROCK CRUSHING CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT NOISE LEVEL SUMMARY ........................ 57
TABLE 11-6: VIBRATION SOURCE LEVELS FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ...................................... 58
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
iv
TABLE 11-7: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT VIBRATION LEVELS ........................................................... 59
LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS
(1) Reference
ADT Average Daily Traffic
ANSI American National Standards Institute
Calveno California Vehicle Noise
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level
dBA A-weighted decibels
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
FTA Federal Transit Administration
INCE Institute of Noise Control Engineering
Leq Equivalent continuous (average) sound level
Lmax Maximum level measured over the time interval
Lmin Minimum level measured over the time interval
mph Miles per hour
OPR Office of Planning and Research
Project Southridge Fontana
REMEL Reference Energy Mean Emission Level
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
1
1 INTRODUCTION
This noise analysis has been completed to determine the noise impacts associated with the development
of the proposed Southridge Fontana (“Project”). This noise study briefly describes the proposed Project,
provides information regarding noise fundamentals, describes the local regulatory setting, provides the
study methods and procedures for noise analysis.
1.1 SITE LOCATION
The proposed Project located at the southeast corner of Live Oak Avenue and Village Drive in the City of
Fontana, as shown on Exhibit 1-A. The purpose of this noise analysis is to evaluate the potential noise
impacts associated with the proposed Project, which will increase the residential density from their
currently adopted zoning.
1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Project is proposing to develop 255 single family attached residential dwelling units. A preliminary
site plan is provided on Exhibit 1-B.
The 39.2-acre Project site is located in the original Southridge Village Specific Plan (SVSP). The 1982 SVSP
EIR (Original Specific Plan) analyzed the development of 8,800 residential units within the entire SVSP
area. Since 1983, 18 amendments to the SVSP (Approved SPA #18) have been processed and a total of
7,836 residential units have been approved. With the exception of the Project site and Planning Area 66B,
which includes an overlay allowing self-storage uses, the SVSP is built out.
TABLE 1-1: SVSP CAPACITIES AT BUILDOUT
Dwelling Units
Original Specific Plan 8,800
Proposed Project 7,999
The Proposed Project intends to develop 255 units on the 39.2-acre site (Planning Areas 66A, 66B, and
56). The Proposed Project is within the remaining development capacity of SVSP. Of the 255 units, 92 units
were assumed to occur on the site and 163 would be transferred from the overall remaining capacity,
which is permitted by the SVSP. Therefore, buildout of the SVSP as modified by the Project is assumed to
be 7,999 units.
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
2
EXHIBIT 1-A: LOCATION MAP
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
3
EXHIBIT 1-B: PROJECT SITE PLAN
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
4
This page intentionally left blank
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
5
2 FUNDAMENTALS
Noise has been simply defined as "unwanted sound." Sound becomes unwanted when it interferes with
normal activities, when it causes actual physical harm or when it has adverse effects on health. Noise is
measured on a logarithmic scale of sound pressure level known as a decibel (dB). A-weighted decibels
(dBA) approximate the subjective response of the human ear to broad frequency noise source by
discriminating against very low and very high frequencies of the audible spectrum. They are adjusted to
reflect only those frequencies which are audible to the human ear. Exhibit 2-A presents a summary of the
typical noise levels and their subjective loudness and effects that are described in more detail below.
EXHIBIT 2-A: TYPICAL NOISE LEVELS
Source: Environmental Protection Agency Office of Noise Abatement and Control, Information on Levels of Environmental Noise
Requisite to Protect Public Health and Welfare with an Adequate Margin of Safety (EPA/ONAC 550/9-74-004) March 1974.
2.1 RANGE OF NOISE
Since the range of intensities that the human ear can detect is so large, the scale frequently used to
measure intensity is a scale based on multiples of 10, the logarithmic scale. The scale for measuring
intensity is the decibel scale. Each interval of 10 decibels indicates a sound energy ten times greater than
before, which is perceived by the human ear as being roughly twice as loud. (1) The most common sounds
vary between 40 dBA (very quiet) to 100 dBA (very loud). Normal conversation at three feet is roughly at
60 dBA, while loud jet engine noises equate to 110 dBA at approximately 100 feet, which can cause serious
discomfort. (2) Another important aspect of noise is the duration of the sound and the way it is described
and distributed in time.
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
6
2.2 NOISE DESCRIPTORS
Environmental noise descriptors are generally based on averages, rather than instantaneous, noise levels.
The most commonly used figure is the equivalent level (Leq). Equivalent sound levels are not measured
directly but are calculated from sound pressure levels typically measured in A-weighted decibels (dBA).
The equivalent sound level (Leq) represents a steady state sound level containing the same total energy as
a time varying signal over a given sample period (typically one hour) and is commonly used to describe
the “average” noise levels within the environment.
Peak hour or average noise levels, while useful, do not completely describe a given noise environment.
Noise levels lower than peak hour may be disturbing if they occur during times when quiet is most
desirable, namely evening and nighttime (sleeping) hours. To account for this, the Community Noise
Equivalent Level (CNEL), representing a composite 24-hour noise level is utilized. The CNEL is the weighted
average of the intensity of a sound, with corrections for time of day, and averaged over 24 hours. The
time of day corrections require the addition of 5 decibels to dBA Leq sound levels in the evening from 7:00
p.m. to 10:00 p.m., and the addition of 10 decibels to dBA Leq sound levels at night between 10:00 p.m.
and 7:00 a.m. These additions are made to account for the noise sensitive time periods during the evening
and night hours when sound appears louder. CNEL does not represent the actual sound level heard at
any time, but rather represents the total sound exposure. The City of Fontana relies on the 24-hour CNEL
level to assess land use compatibility with transportation related noise sources.
2.3 SOUND PROPAGATION
When sound propagates over a distance, it changes in level and frequency content. The way noise reduces
with distance depends on the following factors.
2.3.1 GEOMETRIC SPREADING
Sound from a localized source (i.e., a stationary point source) propagates uniformly outward in a spherical
pattern. The sound level attenuates (or decreases) at a rate of 6 dB for each doubling of distance from a
point source. Highways consist of several localized noise sources on a defined path and hence can be
treated as a line source, which approximates the effect of several point sources. Noise from a line source
propagates outward in a cylindrical pattern, often referred to as cylindrical spreading. Sound levels
attenuate at a rate of 3 dB for each doubling of distance from a line source. (1)
2.3.2 GROUND ABSORPTION
The propagation path of noise from a highway to a receiver is usually very close to the ground. Noise
attenuation from ground absorption and reflective wave canceling adds to the attenuation associated
with geometric spreading. Traditionally, the excess attenuation has also been expressed in terms of
attenuation per doubling of distance. This approximation is usually sufficiently accurate for distances of
less than 200 ft. For acoustically hard sites (i.e., sites with a reflective surface between the source and
the receiver, such as a parking lot or body of water), no excess ground attenuation is assumed. For
acoustically absorptive or soft sites (i.e., those sites with an absorptive ground surface between the source
and the receiver such as soft dirt, grass, or scattered bushes and trees), an excess ground attenuation
value of 1.5 dB per doubling of distance is normally assumed. When added to the cylindrical spreading,
the excess ground attenuation results in an overall drop-off rate of 4.5 dB per doubling of distance from
a line source. (3)
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
7
2.3.3 ATMOSPHERIC EFFECTS
Receivers located downwind from a source can be exposed to increased noise levels relative to calm
conditions, whereas locations upwind can have lowered noise levels. Sound levels can be increased at
large distances (e.g., more than 500 feet) due to atmospheric temperature inversion (i.e., increasing
temperature with elevation). Other factors such as air temperature, humidity, and turbulence can also
have significant effects. (1)
2.3.4 SHIELDING
A large object or barrier in the path between a noise source and a receiver can substantially attenuate
noise levels at the receiver. The amount of attenuation provided by shielding depends on the size of the
object and the frequency content of the noise source. Shielding by trees and other such vegetation
typically only has an “out of sight, out of mind” effect. That is, the perception of noise impact tends to
decrease when vegetation blocks the line-of-sight to nearby residents. However, for vegetation to provide
a substantial, or even noticeable, noise reduction, the vegetation area must be at least 15 feet in height,
100 feet wide and dense enough to completely obstruct the line-of sight between the source and the
receiver. This size of vegetation may provide up to 5 dBA of noise reduction. The FHWA does not consider
the planting of vegetation to be a noise abatement measure. (3)
2.4 NOISE CONTROL
Noise control is the process of obtaining an acceptable noise environment for an observation point or
receiver by controlling the noise source, transmission path, receiver, or all three. This concept is known
as the source-path-receiver concept. In general, noise control measures can be applied to these three
elements.
2.5 NOISE BARRIER ATTENUATION
Effective noise barriers can reduce noise levels by up to 10 to 15 dBA, cutting the loudness of traffic noise
in half. A noise barrier is most effective when placed close to the noise source or receiver. Noise barriers,
however, do have limitations. For a noise barrier to work, it must be high enough and long enough to
block the path of the noise source. (3)
2.6 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY WITH NOISE
Some land uses are more tolerant of noise than others. For example, schools, hospitals, churches, and
residences are more sensitive to noise intrusion than are commercial or industrial developments and
related activities. As ambient noise levels affect the perceived amenity or livability of a development, so
too can the mismanagement of noise impacts impair the economic health and growth potential of a
community by reducing the area’s desirability as a place to live, shop and work. For this reason, land use
compatibility with the noise environment is an important consideration in the planning and design
process. The FHWA encourages State and Local government to regulate land development in such a way
that noise-sensitive land uses are either prohibited from being located adjacent to a highway, or that the
developments are planned, designed, and constructed in such a way that noise impacts are minimized.
(4)
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
8
2.7 COMMUNITY RESPONSE TO NOISE
Community responses to noise may range from registering a complaint by telephone or letter, to initiating
court action, depending upon everyone’s susceptibility to noise and personal attitudes about noise.
Several factors are related to the level of community annoyance including:
Fear associated with noise producing activities;
Socio-economic status and educational level;
Perception that those affected are being unfairly treated;
Attitudes regarding the usefulness of the noise-producing activity;
Belief that the noise source can be controlled.
Approximately ten percent of the population has a very low tolerance for noise and will object to any
noise not of their making. Consequently, even in the quietest environment, some complaints will occur.
Twenty-five percent of the population will not complain even in very severe noise environments. Thus, a
variety of reactions can be expected from people exposed to any given noise environment. (5) Surveys
have shown that about ten percent of the people exposed to traffic noise of 60 dBA will report being
highly annoyed with the noise, and each increase of one dBA is associated with approximately two percent
more people being highly annoyed. When traffic noise exceeds 60 dBA or aircraft noise exceeds 55 dBA,
people may begin to complain. (5) Despite this variability in behavior on an individual level, the
population can be expected to exhibit the following responses to changes in noise levels as shown on
Exhibit 2-B. A change of 3 dBA are considered barely perceptible, and changes of 5 dBA are considered
readily perceptible. (3)
EXHIBIT 2-B: NOISE LEVEL INCREASE PERCEPTION
2.8 VIBRATION
Per the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual,
vibration is the periodic oscillation of a medium or object. The rumbling sound caused by the vibration of
room surfaces is called structure-borne noise. Sources of ground-borne vibrations include natural
phenomena (e.g., earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, sea waves, landslides) or human-made causes (e.g.,
explosions, machinery, traffic, trains, construction equipment). Vibration sources may be continuous,
such as factory machinery, or transient, such as explosions. As is the case with airborne sound, ground-
borne vibrations may be described by amplitude and frequency.
Additionally, in contrast to airborne noise, ground-borne vibration outdoors is not a common
environmental problem and annoyance from ground-borne vibration is almost exclusively an indoor
phenomenon (6). Therefore, the effects of vibrations should only be evaluated at a structure and the
effects of the building structure on the vibration should be considered. Wood-frame buildings, such as
012345678910
Just Perceptible
Barely Perceptible
Readily Perceptible
Twice as Loud
Noise Level Increase (dBA)
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
9
typical residential structures, are more easily excited by ground vibration than heavier buildings. In
contrast, large masonry buildings with spread footings have a low response to ground vibration (6). In
general, the heavier a building is, the lower the response will be to the incident vibration energy.
However, all structurers reduce vibration levels due to the coupling of the building to the soil.
There are several different methods that are used to quantify vibration. The peak particle velocity (PPV)
is defined as the maximum instantaneous peak of the vibration signal (6). The PPV is most frequently used
to describe vibration impacts to buildings but is not always suitable for evaluating human response
(annoyance) because it takes some time for the human body to respond to vibration signals. Instead, the
human body responds to average vibration amplitude often described as the root mean square (RMS).
The RMS amplitude is defined as the average of the squared amplitude of the signal and is most frequently
used to describe the effect of vibration on the human body (6). However, the RMS amplitude and PPV
are related mathematically, and the RMS amplitude of equipment is typically calculated from the PPV
reference level. The RMS amplitude is approximately 70% of the PPV (7). Thus, either can be used on the
description of vibration impacts.
While not universally accepted, vibration decibel notation (VdB) is another vibration notation developed
and used by the FTA in their guidance manual to describe vibration levels and provide a background of
common vibration levels and set vibration limits (8). Decibel notation (VdB) serves to reduce the range of
numbers used to describe vibration levels and is used in this report to describe vibration levels.
As stated in the FTA guidance manual, the background vibration-velocity level in residential areas is
generally 50 VdB. Ground-borne vibration is normally perceptible to humans at approximately 65 VdB.
For most people, a vibration-velocity level of 75 VdB is the approximate dividing line between barely
perceptible and distinctly perceptible levels. Typical outdoor sources of perceptible ground-borne
vibration are construction equipment, steel-wheeled trains, and traffic on rough roads. If a roadway is
smooth, the ground-borne vibration is rarely perceptible. The range of interest is from approximately 50
VdB, which is the typical background vibration-velocity level, to 100 VdB, which is the general threshold
where minor damage can occur in fragile buildings. Exhibit 2-C illustrates common vibration sources and
the human and structural response to ground-borne vibration.
2.9 BLASTING
The intensity of the noise and vibration impacts associated with rock blasting depends on location, size,
material, shape of the rock, and the methods used to crack it. While a blasting contractor can design the
blasts to stay below a given vibration level that could cause damage to nearby structures, it is difficult to
design blasts that produce noise levels which are not perceptible to receivers near the blast site. (7) The
noise produced by blasting activities is referred to as air overpressure, or an “airblast,” which is generated
when explosive energy in the form of gases escape from the detonating blast holes. Much like a point
source, airblasts radiate outward in a spherical pattern and attenuate with each doubling of distance from
the blast location, depending on the design of the blast and amount of containment.
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
10
EXHIBIT 2-C: TYPICAL LEVELS OF GROUND-BORNE VIBRATION
Source: Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual.
Blasting activities generally include: the pre-drilling of holes in the hard rock area; preparation and
placement of the charges in the drilled holes; a pre-blast horn signal; additional pre-blast horn signals
immediately prior to the blast; and the blast itself. An additional horn signal is sounded to indicate the
“all clear” after the blast and the blasting contractor has inspected the blasting area. The noise from the
blast itself starts with a cracking sound from the detonator, located at a distance from the charges, and
ends with the low crackling sound from each charge as they are subsequently set off. Blasts typically occur
for only a few seconds, depending on their design. It is important to note that no other construction
equipment will be operating during each blast in the blast area but will commence operation once the
blasting contractor indicates it is safe to do so. The following equations are provided in this report is based
on the 18th Edition of the International Society of Explosives Engineer’s (ISEE’s) Blasters’ Handbook.
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
11
2.9.1 BLASTING NOISE LEVELS
Air overpressure, or “airblast,” levels generated by blasting can travel up to 1,100 feet per second,
depending on the size of the blast, distance from the blast, and amount of charge confinement. (9) To
determine potential airblast levels (dB) from a blast, the cubed-root scaled distance (SD3) is used based
on the planned maximum charge weight of the blast, and distance to the receiver location being analyzed.
The following equation is provided in the Blasters’ Handbook to calculate the cubed root scaled distance:
SD3 = R / W1/3
Where “R” is equal to the distance to the receiver location (e.g., residential homes), and “W” is equal to
the maximum charge weight detonated within any 8-millisecond period per Blasters’ Handbook
guidelines. With known cubed root scaled distances for each blast, the anticipated airblast levels can be
calculated at the receiver location. The following equation is provided in the Blaster’s Handbook for
calculating airblast levels in “P,” which represents air pressure in pounds per inch squared (lbs/in2):
P = A x (SD3)-B
Where “A” is equal to the intercept of a reference line with the calculated SD3 value. The “A” values are
based on the Blasters’ Handbook for a given reference industry blast (e.g., construction, mining, etc.), and
vary depending on the amount of confinement of each blast. “B” is equal to the slope of the line per
Blasters’ Handbook reference data. It is important to note that airblast levels are calculated in terms of
pressure in the air, and do not represent perceptible noise levels typically described using A-weighted
decibels (dBA). Alternatively, airblast pressure levels can be converted to linear decibels (dB) using the
following equation per the Blasters’ Handbook:
Ps = 20 x log(P / P0)
Where “P” equals the measured or calculated overpressure, and P0 represents the reference ambient air
pressure (2.9 x 10-9 pounds/inch2) per the Blasters’ Handbook.
2.9.2 BLASTING VIBRATION LEVELS
Vibration levels generated by a blast can travel up to 20,000 feet per second, depending on the size of the
blast, travel pathways (e.g., ground discontinuities), and site characteristics. (9) To determine potential
vibration levels (PPV) from a blast, the square-root scaled distance (SD2) is used based on the planned
maximum charge weight of the blast, and distance to the receiver location being analyzed. The following
equation is provided in the Blasters’ Handbook to calculate the square-root scaled distance:
SD2 = R / W1/2
Where “R” is equal to the distance to the receiver location (e.g., residential homes), and “W” is equal to
the maximum charge weight detonated within any 8-millisecond period per Blasters’ Handbook
guidelines. With known square-root scaled distances for each blast, the anticipated PPV levels can be
calculated at the receiver location. The following equation is provided in the Blaster’s Handbook for
calculating vibration levels:
PPV = A x (SD2)-B
Where “A” is equal to the intercept of a reference line with the calculated SD2 value. The “A” values are
based on the lower, best fit, or upper bound lines (provided in the Blasters’ Handbook) for a given
reference industry blast (e.g., construction, mining, etc.), and “B” is equal to the slope of the line.
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
12
This page intentionally left blank
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
13
3 REGULATORY SETTING
To limit population exposure to physically and/or psychologically damaging as well as intrusive noise
levels, the federal government, the State of California, various county governments, and most
municipalities in the state have established standards and ordinances to control noise. In most areas,
automobile and truck traffic is the major source of environmental noise. Traffic activity generally
produces an average sound level that remains constant with time. Air and rail traffic, and commercial and
industrial activities are also major sources of noise in some areas. Federal, state, and local agencies
regulate different aspects of environmental noise. Federal and state agencies generally set noise
standards for mobile sources such as aircraft and motor vehicles, while regulation of stationary sources is
left to local agencies.
3.1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA NOISE REQUIREMENTS
The State of California regulates freeway noise, sets standards for sound transmission, provides
occupational noise control criteria, identifies noise standards, and provides guidance for local land use
compatibility. State law requires that each county and city adopt a General Plan that includes a Noise
Element which is to be prepared per guidelines adopted by the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research
(OPR). (10) The purpose of the Noise Element is to limit the exposure of the community to excessive noise
levels. In addition, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that all known environmental
effects of a project be analyzed, including environmental noise impacts.
3.2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE
3.1.1 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION
The State of California’s noise insulation standards for all residential units are codified in the California
Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 24, Building Standards Administrative Code, Chapter 12, Section 1206.
These noise standards are applied to new construction that contains dwelling units or sleeping units, such
as residential and hotel or motel uses, in California for controlling interior noise levels resulting from
exterior noise sources. For new buildings, the acceptable interior noise limit is 45 dBA CNEL in habitable
rooms (11).
3.1.2 NON-RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION
The 2019 State of California’s Green Building Standards Code contains mandatory measures for non-
residential building construction in Section 5.507 on Environmental Comfort. (12) These noise standards
are applied to new construction in California for controlling interior noise levels resulting from exterior
noise sources. The regulations require the use of prescriptive measures and allow for a noise study to
demonstrate compliance using performance-based measures when non-residential structures are
developed in areas where the exterior noise levels exceed 65 dBA CNEL, such as within a noise contour of
an airport, freeway, or railroad as shown in a local General Plan.
In areas where noise contours are not readily available the noise standard shall be 65 dBA Leq during any
hour of operation. A project exposed to these noise levels must demonstrate compliance with the Section
5.507.4.1 prescriptive method or the Section 5.507.4.2 performance method of noise reduction. Under
Section 5.507.4.1 the combined sound transmission class (STC) rating of the wall and roof-ceiling
assemblies must be at least 50, and exterior windows with a minimum STC rating of 40 are required.
Alternatively, the Section 5.507.4.2 environmental comfort criteria of the Green Building Standards code
can be met if the interior noise levels of the Project building satisfy the hourly equivalent level of 50 dBA
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
14
Leq in occupied areas during any hour of operation. As such, this noise assessment has been prepared to
satisfy the 50 dBA Leq interior noise level performance criteria.
3.3 CITY OF FONTANA GENERAL PLAN NOISE ELEMENT
The City of Fontana General Plan was updated on November 13, 2018. (13) To protect residents from the
negative effects of noise, the City of Fontana has identified the following goals, policies, and actions in the
General Plan Noise Element:
Goal 8:
The City of Fontana protects sensitive land uses from excessive noise by diligent planning through 2035.
Policies:
New sensitive land uses shall be prohibited in incompatible areas.
Noise-tolerant land uses shall be guided into areas irrevocably committed to land uses that are noise-producing, such as
transportation corridors.
Where sensitive uses are to be placed along transportation routes, mitigation shall be provided to ensure compliance with
state- mandated noise levels.
Noise spillover or encroachment from commercial, industrial and educational land uses shall be minimized into adjoining
residential neighborhoods or noise-sensitive uses.
Actions:
A. The following uses shall be considered noise-sensitive and discouraged in areas in excess of 65 dBA CNEL
(Community Noise Equivalent Level): Residential Uses; Hospitals; Rest Homes; Long Term Care Facilities; and
Mental Care Facilities.
B. The following uses shall be considered noise-sensitive and discouraged in areas in excess of 65 Leq(12)
(Equivalent Continuous Sound Level): Schools; Libraries; Places of Worship; and Passive Recreation Uses.
C. The State of California Office of Planning and Research General Plan Guidelines shall be followed with respect
to acoustical study requirements.
Goal 9:
The City of Fontana provides a diverse and efficiently operated ground transportation system that generates the minimum feasible
noise on its residents through 2035.
Policies
All noise sections of the State Motor Vehicle Code shall be enforced.
Roads shall be maintained such that the paving is in good condition and free of cracks, bumps, and potholes.
Noise mitigation measures shall be included in the design of new roadway projects in the city.
Actions
D. On-road trucking activities shall continue to be regulated in the City to ensure noise impacts are minimized,
including, including the implementation of truck-routes based on traffic studies.
E. Development that generates increased traffic and subsequent increases in the ambient noise level adjacent to
noise-sensitive land uses shall provide appropriate mitigation measures.
F. Noise mitigation practices shall be employed when designing all future streets and highways, and when
improvements occur along existing highway segments.
G. Explore the use of “quiet pavement” materials for street improvements.
Goal 10:
Fontana’s residents are protected from the negative effects of “spillover” noise.
Policy
Residential land uses and areas identified as noise-sensitive shall be protected from excessive noise from non-transportation
sources including industrial, commercial, and residential activities and equipment.
Actions
A. Projects located in commercial areas shall not exceed stationary- source noise standards at the property line
of proximate residential or commercial uses.
B. Industrial uses shall not exceed commercial or residential stationary source noise standards at the most
proximate land uses.
C. Non-transportation noise shall be considered in land use planning decisions.
D. Construction shall be performed as quietly as feasible when performed in proximity to residential or other
noise sensitive land uses.
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
15
3.4 OPERATIONAL NOISE STANDARDS
To analyze noise impacts originating from a designated fixed location or private property such as the
Southridge Fontana Project, stationary-source (operational) noise such as the expected air conditioning
units and parking lot vehicle movements are typically evaluated against standards established under a
jurisdiction’s Municipal Code. The City of Fontana noise control guidelines for determining and mitigating
non-transportation or stationary noise source impacts from operations in neighboring residential areas
are found in the Zoning and Development Code (Section 30-649), provided in Appendix 3.1. For residential
zoning districts, Section 30-649 indicates that no person shall create or cause to be created any sound
which exceeds the noise levels in this section as measured at the property line of any residentially zoned
property. The performance standards found in Section 30-649 limit the exterior noise level to 65 dBA Leq
during the daytime and nighttime hours at sensitive receiver locations as shown on Table 3-1. (14)
TABLE 3-1: OPERATIONAL NOISE STANDARDS
Jurisdiction Land use Noise Level Standards (dBA Leq)1
Daytime Nighttime
City of Fontana1 Residential 65 65
1 Source: Section 30-469 of the City of Fontana Development Code (Appendix 3.1).
2 Leq represents a steady state sound level containing the same total energy as a time varying signal over a given sample period.
"Daytime" = 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.; "Nighttime" = 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.
3.5 CONSTRUCTION NOISE STANDARDS
The City of Fontana has set restrictions to control noise impacts associated with the construction of the
proposed Project. According to Section 18-63(b)(7), Construction or repairing of buildings or structures,
construction activity is limited: between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on weekdays and between
the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays except in the case of urgent necessity. (15) Project
construction noise levels are, therefore, considered exempt from municipal regulation if activities occur
within the hours specified in the City of Fontana Municipal Code, Section 18-63(7) of 7:00 a.m. to 6:00
p.m. on weekdays and between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays. However, if activity
occurs outside of these hours, the City of Fontana stationary-source (operational) noise level standards of
65 dBA Leq during the daytime and nighttime hours shall apply as previously discussed in Section 3.4. Since
neither the City of Fontana General Plan and Municipal Codes establish numeric maximum acceptable
construction source noise levels at potentially affected receivers, which would allow for a quantified
determination of what CEQA constitutes a substantial temporary or periodic noise increase. Therefore, a
numerical construction threshold based on Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Noise and
Vibration Impact Assessment Manual is used for analysis of daytime construction impacts, as discussed
below.
According to the FTA, local noise ordinances are typically not very useful in evaluating construction noise.
They usually relate to nuisance and hours of allowed activity, and sometimes specify limits in terms of
maximum levels, but are generally not practical for assessing the impact of a construction project. Project
construction noise criteria should account for the existing noise environment, the absolute noise levels
during construction activities, the duration of the construction, and the adjacent land use. Due to the lack
of standardized construction noise thresholds, the FTA provides guidelines that can be considered
reasonable criteria for construction noise assessment. The FTA considers a daytime exterior construction
noise level of 80 dBA Leq as a reasonable threshold for noise sensitive residential land use. (16 p. 179)
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
16
3.6 CONSTRUCTION VIBRATION STANDARDS
Construction activity can result in varying degrees of ground-borne vibration, depending on the
equipment and methods used, distance to the affected structures and soil type. Construction vibration is
generally associated with pile driving and rock blasting. Other construction equipment such as air
compressors, light trucks, hydraulic loaders, etc., generates little or no ground vibration. (17) To analyze
vibration impacts originating from the operation and construction of the Project vibration-generating
activities are appropriately evaluated against standards established under a City’s Municipal Code, if such
standards exist. However, the City of Fontana does not identify specific vibration level limits. Therefore,
for analysis purposes, the Caltrans Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual, Table 19,
vibration damage are used in this noise study to assess potential temporary construction-related impacts
at adjacent building locations. (7 p. 38) The existing buildings adjacent to the Project site can best be
described as “older residential structures” with a maximum acceptable continuous vibration threshold of
0.3 PPV (in/sec).
3.7 AIRPORT LAND USE COMPATIBILITY
The Project site is located roughly 5.8 miles southeast of the Ontario International Airport (ONT). This
places the Project site within the ONT Airport Influence Area according to Policy Map 2-1 of the Ontario
International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ONT ALUCP). The ONT ALUCP was amended July 2018
to promote compatibility between airport and the land uses that surround it. (18) Since the Project site
is located within the ONT Airport Influence Area, the Project is subject to the Noise Criteria established
on Table 2-3 in the ONT ALUCP. As shown on Exhibit 3-A, the Project site is located outside the 60-65 dBA
CNEL airport noise impact zone consistent with Policy Map 2-3. According to Table 2-3 of the ONT ALUCP,
residential land uses located outside the 60 dBA CNEL noise level contours of ONT, such as the Project,
are considered normally compatible land use.
3.8 BLASTING STANDARDS
The blasting contractor is required to obtain blasting permit(s) from the County, and to notify City of
Fontana Police/Fire Department within 24 hours of planned blasting events. Air overpressure regulations
are identified by the U.S. Bureau of Mines 30 CFR Ch. VII, §816.67(b)(1)(i) of U.S. Bureau of Mines
publication RI8485 and vibration limits are identified in 30 CFR Ch. VII, §816.67(d)(2)(i) of U.S. Bureau of
Mines publication RI8508. (9)
3.8.1 BLASTING NOISE LIMITS
Based on Table 26.17 Typical Air Overpressure Damage Criteria of the Blasters’ Handbook (9), an air
overpressure of 133 dB is identified as a perception-based criteria level for blasting. As such, to present
a conservative approach, the Project blasting-related noise and airblast levels are based on the 133 dB
criteria for airblasts identified by the ISEE and U.S. Bureau of Mines. This is the same blasting noise limit
outlined in the sample blasting specifications on page D-5 of the Caltrans Transportation and Construction
Vibration Guidance Manual. (7)
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
17
EXHIBIT 3-A: LA/ONT FUTURE AIRPORT NOISE CONTOURS
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
18
3.8.2 BLASTING VIBRATION LIMITS
To analyze vibration impacts originating from the blasting, vibration-generating rock blasting activities are
appropriately evaluated against standards established under a jurisdiction’s County Code, if such
standards exist. However, the City of Fontana does not identify specific blasting vibration level limits.
Therefore, for analysis purposes, the Caltrans Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance
Manual, (7 p. 38) Table 19, vibration criteria are used in this noise study to assess construction-related
blasting impacts at the closest sensitive receiver locations. Caltrans guidance identifies a maximum
acceptable transient peak-particle-velocity (PPV) vibration threshold of 0.5 inches per second (in/sec).
Therefore, the 0.5 PPV (in/sec) vibration threshold is used to evaluate the potential blasting-related
vibration levels experienced at the closest residences.
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
19
4 SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA
The following significance criteria are based on currently adopted guidance provided by Appendix G of
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. (19) For the purposes of this report, impacts
would be potentially significant if the Project results in or causes:
A. Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the
vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
B. Generation of excessive ground-borne vibration or ground-borne noise levels?
C. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where
such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would
the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
While the City of Fontana General Plan Guidelines provide direction on noise compatibility and establish
noise standards by land use type that are sufficient to assess the significance of noise impacts, they do
not define the levels at which increases are considered substantial for use under Guideline A. CEQA
Appendix G Guideline C applies to nearby public and private airports, if any, and the Project’s land use
compatibility.
4.1 CEQA GUIDELINES NOT FURTHER ANALYZED
As previously indicated in Section 3.7, the ONT Airport noise contour boundaries are presented on Exhibit
3-A of this report and show that the Project is considered normally compatible land use since it is outside
the 60-65 dBA CNEL noise impact zone. The Project does not propose or require facilities or actions that
would contribute to or exacerbate noise generated by ONT facilities and activities. Therefore, the Project
would not be adversely affected by airport noise, nor would the Project contribute to or result in adverse
airport noise impacts. As such, airport noise impacts are not analyzed further.
4.2 SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA SUMMARY
Noise impacts shall be considered significant if any of the following occur as a direct result of the proposed
development. Table 4-1 shows the significance criteria summary matrix.
ON-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE
If the on-site noise levels:
o exceed an interior noise level of 45 dBA CNEL for residential uses or exceed an interior
noise level of 65 dBA CNEL for residential land uses (City of Fontana General Plan Noise
Element).
OFF-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE
When the noise levels at existing and future noise-sensitive land uses (e.g., residential, hospital,
etc.):
o are less than 60 dBA CNEL and the Project creates a readily perceptible 5 dBA CNEL or
greater Project-related noise level increase; or
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
20
o range from 60 to 65 dBA CNEL and the Project creates a barely perceptible 3 dBA CNEL or
greater Project-related noise level increase; or
o already exceed 65 dBA CNEL, and the Project creates a community noise level increase of
greater than 1.5 dBA CNEL (FICON, 1992).
OPERATIONAL NOISE
If Project-related operational (stationary-source) noise levels exceed the base exterior noise level
standard of 65 dBA Leq during the daytime hours (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) and 65 dBA Leq during
the nighttime hours (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) for noise-sensitive residential and institutional uses
in the Project study area.
o When the noise levels at existing and future noise-sensitive land uses (e.g., residential,
etc.):
o are less than 60 dBA Leq and the Project creates a readily perceptible 5 dBA Leq or greater
Project-related noise level increase; or
o range from 60 to 65 dBA Leq and the Project creates a barely perceptible 3 dBA Leq or
greater Project-related noise level increase; or
o already exceed 65 dBA Leq, and the Project creates a community noise level impact of
greater than 1.5 dBA Leq (FICON, 1992).
CONSTRUCTION NOISE AND VIBRATION
If Project-related construction activities:
o occur at any time other than the permitted hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday
through Friday; 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Saturdays; with no activity allowed on Sundays
or holidays (City of Fontana Municipal Code, Section 18-63(7)); or
o create noise levels which exceed the 80 dBA Leq acceptable noise level threshold at
the nearby sensitive receiver locations (FTA 2018).
If short-term Project generated construction vibration levels exceed the City of Fontana
acceptable vibration standard of 0.3 PPV in/sec at sensitive receiver locations (FTA 2018).
BLASTING NOISE AND VIBRATION
If Project-related blasting activities:
o occur at any time other than the permitted hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday
through Friday; 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Saturdays; with no activity allowed on Sundays
or holidays (City of Fontana Municipal Code, Section 18-63(7)); or
o create noise levels which exceed an air overpressure of 133 dB threshold at any
nearby sensitive receiver locations (U.S. Bureau of Mines).
If short-term Project generated blasting vibration levels exceed the vibration standard of
0.5 PPV in/sec at any sensitive receiver locations (Caltrans 2020).
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
21
TABLE 4-1: SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA SUMMARY
Analysis Condition(s) Significance Criteria
Daytime Nighttime
On-Site Traffic1 Exterior Noise Compatibility Criteria 65 dBA CNEL
Interior Noise Level Standard 45 dBA CNEL
Off Site Traffic
If ambient is < 60 dBA Leq3 ≥ 5 dBA Leq Project increase
If ambient is 60 - 65 dBA Leq3 ≥ 3 dBA Leq Project increase
If ambient is > 65 dBA Leq3 ≥ 1.5 dBA Leq Project increase
Operational
Exterior Noise Level Standards2 70 dBA Leq 65 dBA Leq
If ambient is < 60 dBA Leq3 ≥ 5 dBA Leq Project increase
If ambient is 60 - 65 dBA Leq3 ≥ 3 dBA Leq Project increase
If ambient is > 65 dBA Leq3 ≥ 1.5 dBA Leq Project increase
Construction Noise Level Threshold3 80 dBA Leq 65 dBA Leq
Vibration Level Threshold4 0.3 PPV (in/sec)
Blasting Noise Level Threshold5 133 dB
Vibration Level Threshold4 0.5 PPV (in/sec)
1 Section 30-543 of the City of Fontana Municipal Code.
2 Sections 18-63(7) and 30-543 of the City of Fontana Municipal Code.
3 FICON Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual.
4 Caltrans Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual.
5 International Society of Explosives Engineers 18th Edition Blasters’ Handbook
"Daytime" = 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.; "Nighttime" = 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
22
This page intentionally left blank
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
23
5 EXISTING NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
To assess the existing noise level environment, 24-hour noise level measurements were taken at five
locations in the Project study area. The receiver locations were selected to describe and document the
existing noise environment within the Project study area. Exhibit 5-A shows the Project site and the noise
level measurement locations. To fully describe the existing noise conditions, noise level measurements
were collected by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on Thursday, February 24, 2022. Appendix 5.1 includes study
area photos.
5.1 MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE AND CRITERIA
To describe the existing noise environment, the hourly noise levels were measured during typical weekday
conditions over a 24-hour period. By collecting individual hourly noise level measurements, it is possible
to describe the daytime and nighttime hourly noise levels and calculate the 24-hour CNEL. The long-term
noise readings were recorded using Piccolo Type 2 integrating sound level meter and dataloggers. The
Piccolo sound level meters were calibrated using a Larson-Davis calibrator, Model CAL 150. All noise
meters were programmed in "slow" mode to record noise levels in "A" weighted form. The sound level
meters and microphones were equipped with a windscreen during all measurements. All noise level
measurement equipment satisfies the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standard
specifications for sound level meters ANSI S1.4-2014/IEC 61672-1:2013. (20)
5.2 NOISE MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS
The long-term noise level measurements were positioned as close to the nearest sensitive receiver
locations as possible to assess the existing ambient hourly noise levels surrounding the Project site. Both
Caltrans and the FTA recognize that it is not reasonable to collect noise level measurements that can fully
represent every part of a private yard, patio, deck, or balcony normally used for human activity when
estimating impacts for new development projects. This is demonstrated in the Caltrans general site
location guidelines which indicate that, sites must be free of noise contamination by sources other than
sources of interest. Avoid sites located near sources such as barking dogs, lawnmowers, pool pumps, and
air conditioners unless it is the express intent of the analyst to measure these sources. (1) Further, FTA
guidance states, that it is not necessary nor recommended that existing noise exposure be determined by
measuring at every noise-sensitive location in the project area. Rather, the recommended approach is to
characterize the noise environment for clusters of sites based on measurements or estimates at
representative locations in the community. (17)
Based on recommendations of Caltrans and the FTA, it is not necessary to collect measurements at each
individual building or residence, because each receiver measurement represents a group of buildings that
share acoustical equivalence. (17) In other words, the area represented by the receiver shares similar
shielding, terrain, and geometric relationship to the reference noise source. Receivers represent a
location of noise sensitive areas and are used to estimate the future noise level impacts. Collecting
reference ambient noise level measurements at the nearby sensitive receiver locations allows for a
comparison of the before and after Project noise levels and is necessary to assess potential noise impacts
due to the Project’s contribution to the ambient noise levels.
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
24
5.3 NOISE MEASUREMENT RESULTS
The noise measurements presented below focus on the average or equivalent sound levels (Leq). The
equivalent sound level (Leq) represents a steady state sound level containing the same total energy as a
time varying signal over a given sample period. Table 5-1 identifies the hourly daytime (7:00 a.m. to 10:00
p.m.) and nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) noise levels at each noise level measurement location.
Appendix 5.2 provides a summary of the existing hourly ambient noise levels.
TABLE 5-1: 24-HOUR AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
Location1 Description
Energy Average
Noise Level
(dBA Leq)2
Daytime Nighttime
L1 Located north of the Project site near single-
family residence at 11511 Conifer Court. 61.3 54.4
L2 Located east of the Project site near single-
family residence at 11605 Teaberry Court. 57.3 57.9
L3 Located southeast of the Project site near single-
family residence at 15016 Long View Drive. 46.6 46.0
L4 Located south of the Project site near single-
family residence at 11804 Aurora Court. 60.0 47.8
L5 Located west of the Project site near single-
family residence at 14799 Goldenrain Drive. 68.7 63.6
1 See Exhibit 5-A for the noise level measurement locations.
2 Energy (logarithmic) average levels. The long-term 24-hour measurement worksheets are included in
Appendix 5.2.
"Daytime" = 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.; "Nighttime" = 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.
Table 5-1 provides the (energy average) noise levels used to describe the daytime and nighttime ambient
conditions. These daytime and nighttime energy average noise levels represent the average of all hourly
noise levels observed during these time periods expressed as a single number. Appendix 5.2 provides
summary worksheets of the noise levels for each hour as well as the minimum, maximum, L1, L2, L5, L8, L25,
L50, L90, L95, and L99 percentile noise levels observed during the daytime and nighttime periods. The
background ambient noise levels in the Project study area are dominated by the transportation-related
noise associated with nearby surface streets. This includes the auto and heavy truck activities on study
area roadway segments near the noise level measurement locations.
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
25
EXHIBIT 5-A: NOISE MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
26
This page intentionally left blank
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
27
6 METHODS AND PROCEDURES
The following section outlines the methods and procedures used to estimate and analyze the future traffic
noise environment. Consistent with the City of Fontana General Plan Policies for land use, all
transportation related noise levels are presented in terms of the 24-hour CNEL’s.
6.1 FHWA TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
The estimated roadway noise impacts from vehicular traffic were calculated using a computer program
that replicates the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Traffic Noise Prediction Model- FHWA-RD-77-
108. (21) The FHWA Model arrives at a predicted noise level through a series of adjustments to the
Reference Energy Mean Emission Level (REMEL). In California the national REMELs are substituted with
the California Vehicle Noise (Calveno) Emission Levels. (22) Adjustments are then made to the REMEL to
account for: the roadway classification (e.g., collector, secondary, major or arterial), the roadway active
width (i.e., the distance between the center of the outermost travel lanes on each side of the roadway),
the total average daily traffic (ADT), the travel speed, the percentages of automobiles, medium trucks,
and heavy trucks in the traffic volume, the roadway grade, the angle of view (e.g., whether the roadway
view is blocked), the site conditions ("hard" or "soft" relates to the absorption of the ground, pavement,
or landscaping), and the percentage of total ADT which flows each hour throughout a 24-hour period.
6.2 ON-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL INPUTS
The on-site roadway parameters including the ADT volumes used for this analysis are presented on Table
6-1. Based on the City of Fontana Design Standards, Section 400, Street Design.
TABLE 6-1: ON-SITE ROADWAY PARAMETERS
Roadway Lanes Classification1
Design
Capacity
(ADT)2
Speed
(MPH)3 Site Conditions
Live Oak Ave 2 Collector 30,000 35 Soft
1 City of Fonana General Plan, Exhibit 9.2 Hierarchy of Sreets In Fontana.
2 City of Fonatana, Section 400 Street Design.
3 Posted Speed Limit
The traffic volumes shown in Table 6-1 reflect future long-range traffic conditions needed to assess the
future on-site traffic noise environment and to identify potential mitigation measures (if any) that address
the worst-case future conditions. For the purposes of this analysis, soft site conditions were used to
analyze the on-site traffic noise impacts for the Project study area. Soft site conditions account for the
sound propagation loss over natural surfaces such as normal earth and ground vegetation. Research
conducted by Caltrans has shown that the use of soft site conditions is appropriate for the application of
the FHWA traffic noise prediction model used in this analysis. (23) Table 6-2 presents the time-of-day
vehicle splits by vehicle type used to develop the 24-hour CNEL, and Table 6-3 presents the total traffic
flow distributions (vehicle mixes) used for this analysis. The information in Tables 6-2 and 6-3 provides
the hourly distribution percentages of automobile, medium trucks, and heavy trucks for input into the
FHWA Model based on roadway types.
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
28
TABLE 6-2: TIME OF DAY VEHICLE SPLITS
Vehicle Type Time of Day Splits1 Total of Time of
Day Splits Daytime Evening Nighttime
Autos 77.50% 12.90% 9.60% 100.00%
Medium Trucks 84.80% 4.90% 10.30% 100.00%
Heavy Trucks 86.50% 2.70% 10.80% 100.00%
1 Typical Southern California time of day vehicle splits.
"Daytime" = 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.; "Evening" = 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.; "Nighttime" = 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.
TABLE 6-3: DISTRIBUTION OF TRAFFIC FLOW BY VEHICLE TYPE (VEHICLE MIX)
Roadway Total % Traffic Flow Total Autos Medium Trucks Heavy Trucks
All Roadways1 97.42% 1.84% 0.74% 100.00%
1 Typical Southern California vehicle mix.
The site plan is used to identify the relationship between the roadway centerline elevation, the pad
elevation and the centerline distance to any intervening noise barriers, and the building façade. The
exterior noise level impacts were placed five feet above the pad elevation at the proposed building façade
for first-floor level analysis. Second through third floor receivers were place 9 feet above each floor level
(i.e., 14 feet and 23 feet).
6.3 OFF-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL INPUTS
Table 6-4 identifies the eight off-site study area roadway segments, the distance from the centerline to
adjacent land use based on the functional roadway classifications per the City of Fontana General Plan
Connected City Element, and the posted vehicle speeds. Consistent with the Traffic Analysis prepared by
Urban Crossroads, Inc. for the Project, (24) the off-site traffic noise analysis includes the following traffic
scenarios.
Existing
Existing Plus Project (E+P)
Existing + Ambient + Cumulative Year 2025 (EAC)
EAC + Project Year 2025 (EACP)
The average daily traffic (ADT) volumes used for this study are presented on Table 6-5. Table 6-2 and
Table 6-3 provides the time of day (daytime, evening, and nighttime) vehicle splits used for calculating
CNEL values.
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
29
TABLE 6-4: OFF-SITE ROADWAY PARAMETERS
ID Roadway Segment Classification2
Centerline
Distance to
Receiving Land
Use (Feet)3
Vehicle
Speed
(mph)
1 Live Oaks Ave w/o Cherry Ave Collector 30' 25
2 Live Oaks Ave e/o Cherry Ave Collector 30' 35
3 Live Oaks Ave n/o Driveway 1 Collector 30' 35
4 Live Oaks Ave n/o Goldenrain Dr Collector 30' 35
5 Live Oaks Ave n/o Jurupa Ave Industrial Collector 40' 35
6 Cherry Ave n/o Jurupa Ave Primary Highway 52' 35
7 Cherry Ave s/o Jurupa Ave Primary Highway 52' 35
8 Cherry Ave s/o Live Oaks Ave Primary Highway 52' 35
9 Jurupa Ave w/o Cherry Ave Modified Major Highway 66' 45
10 Jurupa Ave e/o Cherry Ave Modified Major Highway 66' 45
11 Jurupa Ave e/o Live Oaks Ave Modified Major Highway 66' 45
1 Based on a review of existing aerial imagery. Noise sensitive uses limited to existing residential land uses.
2 City of Fontana General Plan Community Mobility Circulation Element.
3 Based upon the right-of-way distances for each roadway classification provided in the City of Fontana Design Standards, Section 400,
Street Design.
TABLE 6-5: AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES
ID Roadway Segment
Average Daily Traffic Volumes1
Existing Opening Year
Without
Project
With
Project
Without
Project
With
Project
1 Live Oaks Ave w/o Cherry Ave 3,077 3,077 3,397 3,397
2 Live Oaks Ave e/o Cherry Ave 8,590 10,058 9,484 10,952
3 Live Oaks Ave n/o Driveway 1 8,697 10,167 9,602 11,072
4 Live Oaks Ave n/o Goldenrain Dr 8,270 8,638 9,130 9,498
5 Live Oaks Ave n/o Jurupa Ave 2,137 2,229 2,359 2,451
6 Cherry Ave n/o Jurupa Ave 14,509 14,969 16,862 17,322
7 Cherry Ave s/o Jurupa Ave 10,364 11,284 11,920 12,840
8 Cherry Ave s/o Live Oaks Ave 12,885 13,435 14,310 14,860
1 Southbridge Fontana Traffic Analysis, Urban Crossroads, Inc.
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
30
This page intentionally left blank
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
31
7 ON-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS
An on-site exterior noise impact analysis has been completed to determine the traffic noise exposure and
to identify potential necessary noise abatement measures for the proposed Southridge Fontana Project.
It is expected that the primary source of noise impacts to the Project site will be traffic noise from Live
Oak Avenue in the Project study area. The Project will also experience some background traffic noise
impacts from its internal local streets, however, due to the distance, topography and low traffic
volume/speed, traffic noise from these roads will not make a significant contribution to the noise
environment.
7.1 ON-SITE EXTERIOR NOISE ANALYSIS
Using the FHWA traffic noise prediction model and the parameters outlined in Tables 6-1 to 6-3, the
expected future exterior noise levels were calculated. Table 7-1 presents a summary of future exterior
noise level impacts at the building facades of the proposed residential dwelling units consistent with the
standards of the City of Fontana General Plan Noise Element. The on-site traffic noise level analysis
indicates that the Project will experience unmitigated exterior noise levels ranging from 52.6 to 62.3 dBA
CNEL at the first-floor elevation. This noise analysis shows that the Project will satisfy the City of Fontana
noise standards for residential land uses. All calculations are provided in Appendix 7.1.
TABLE 7-1: EXTERIOR NOISE LEVELS (CNEL)
Lot Location1 Roadway Unmitigated Exterior Noise Level (dBA CNEL)1
1st Floor 2nd Floor 3rd Floor 4th Floor
1 Live Oak Ave 62.3 62.2 61.8 61.4
2 Live Oak Ave 60.3 60.2 60.0 59.7
3 Live Oak Ave 54.8 54.8 54.8 54.7
32 Live Oak Ave 53.0 53.0 53.0 53.0
33 Live Oak Ave 52.7 52.7 52.7 52.6
1 See Exhibit 7-A for receiver locations.
2 Exterior noise calculations at the building façade are shown in Appendix 7.1.
7.2 ON-SITE INTERIOR NOISE ANALYSIS
The future noise levels were calculated at the first, second, and third-floor building façades to ensure that
the interior noise levels comply with the City of Fontana 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standards.
7.2.1 NOISE REDUCTION METHODOLOGY
The interior noise level is the difference between the predicted exterior noise level at the building façade
and the noise reduction of the structure. Typical building construction will provide a Noise Reduction (NR)
of approximately 12 dBA with "windows open" and a minimum 25 dBA noise reduction with "windows
closed." However, sound leaks, cracks and openings within the window assembly can greatly diminish its
effectiveness in reducing noise. Several methods are used to improve interior noise reduction, including:
(1) weather-stripped solid core exterior doors; (2) upgraded dual glazed windows; (3) mechanical
ventilation/air conditioning; and (4) exterior wall/roof assembles free of cut outs or openings.
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
32
7.2.2 INTERIOR NOISE LEVEL ASSESSMENT
Tables 6-2 to 6-4 show that the residential homes nearest Live Oak Avenue will require a windows-closed
condition and a means of mechanical ventilation (e.g. air conditioning). Table 6-2 shows that the future
unmitigated noise levels at the first-floor building façade are expected to range from 53.0 to 62.3 dBA
CNEL. Table 6-3 shows the future unmitigated noise levels at the second-floor building façade will range
from 53.0 to 62.2 dBA CNEL, and Table 6-4 shows the future unmitigated noise levels at the third-floor
building façade will range from 52.7 to 61.8 dBA CNEL. The interior noise level analysis shows that the
City of Fontana 45 dBA CNEL with windows closed interior noise standards can be satisfied using standard
windows and sliding glass doors with a minimum STC ratings of 27.
TABLE 7-2: FIRST FLOOR INTERIOR NOISE IMPACTS (CNEL)
Lot
Noise
Level
at Façade1
Required
Interior
NR2
Minimum
Calculated
Interior
NR3
Upgraded
Windows4
Interior
Noise
Level5
Threshold Threshold
Exceeded?
1 62.3 17.3 25.0 No 37.3 45 No
2 60.3 15.3 25.0 No 35.3 45 No
3 54.8 9.8 25.0 No 29.8 45 No
32 53.0 8.0 25.0 No 28.0 45 No
33 52.7 7.7 25.0 No 27.7 45 No
1 Exterior noise level at the facade with a windows closed condition requiring a means of mechanical ventilation (e.g. air
conditioning).
2 Noise reduction required to satisfy the State of California interior noise standard for non-residential occupied spaces.
3 Minimum calculated interior noise reduction from all rooms for each unit plan as shown on Table 7-1.
4 Does the required interior noise reduction trigger upgraded windows with a minimum STC rating of greater than 27?
5 Estimated interior noise level with minimum STC rating for all windows.
"NR" = Noise Reduction
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
33
TABLE 7-3: SECOND FLOOR INTERIOR NOISE IMPACTS (CNEL)
Lot
Noise
Level
at Façade1
Required
Interior
NR2
Minimum
Calculated
Interior
NR3
Upgraded
Windows4
Interior
Noise
Level5
Threshold Threshold
Exceeded?
1 62.2 17.2 25.0 No 37.2 45 No
2 60.2 15.2 25.0 No 35.2 45 No
3 54.8 9.8 25.0 No 29.8 45 No
32 53.0 8.0 25.0 No 28.0 45 No
33 52.7 7.7 25.0 No 27.7 45 No
1 Exterior noise level at the facade with a windows closed condition requiring a means of mechanical ventilation (e.g. air
conditioning).
2 Noise reduction required to satisfy the City of Redlands General Plan 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standard for residential uses.
3 Minimum calculated interior noise reduction from all rooms for each unit plan as shown on Table 7-1.
4 Does the required interior noise reduction trigger upgraded windows with a minimum STC rating of greater than 27?
5 Estimated interior noise level with minimum STC rating for all windows.
"NR" = Noise Reduction
TABLE 7-4: THIRD FLOOR INTERIOR NOISE IMPACTS (CNEL)
Lot
Noise
Level
at Façade1
Required
Interior
NR2
Minimum
Calculated
Interior
NR3
Upgraded
Windows4
Interior
Noise
Level5
Threshold Threshold
Exceeded?
1 61.8 16.8 25.0 No 36.8 45 No
2 60.0 15.0 25.0 No 35.0 45 No
3 54.8 9.8 25.0 No 29.8 45 No
32 53.0 8.0 25.0 No 28.0 45 No
33 52.7 7.7 25.0 No 27.7 45 No
1 Exterior noise level at the facade with a windows closed condition requiring a means of mechanical ventilation (e.g. air
conditioning).
2 Noise reduction required to satisfy the City of Redlands General Plan 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standard for residential uses.
3 Minimum calculated interior noise reduction from all rooms for each unit plan as shown on Table 7-1.
4 Does the required interior noise reduction trigger upgraded windows with a minimum STC rating of greater than 27?
5 Estimated interior noise level with minimum STC rating for all windows.
"NR" = Noise Reduction
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
34
This page intentionally left blank
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
35
8 OFF-SITE TRANSPORTATION NOISE IMPACTS
To assess the off-site transportation CNEL noise level impacts associated with the proposed Project, noise
contours were developed based on the Southridge Fontana Focused Traffic Analysis (24). Noise contour
boundaries represent the equal levels of noise exposure and are measured in CNEL from the center of the
roadway.
8.1 TRAFFIC NOISE CONTOURS
Noise contours were used to assess the Project's incremental 24-hour dBA CNEL traffic-related noise
impacts at land uses adjacent to roadways conveying Project traffic. The noise contours represent the
distance to noise levels of a constant value and are measured from the center of the roadway for the 70,
65, and 60 dBA CNEL noise levels. The noise contours do not consider the effect of any existing noise
barriers or topography that may attenuate ambient noise levels. In addition, because the noise contours
reflect modeling of vehicular noise on area roadways, they appropriately do not reflect noise
contributions from the surrounding stationary noise sources within the Project study area.
Tables 8-1 through 8-4 present a summary of the exterior dBA CNEL traffic noise levels. Roadway
segments are analyzed in each of the following timeframes: Existing without and with Project conditions,
EAC Year 2027 without and with Project conditions. Appendix 8.1 includes a summary of the dBA CNEL
traffic noise level contours for each of the traffic scenarios.
TABLE 8-1: EXISTING WITHOUT PROJECT NOISE CONTOURS
ID Road Segment
CNEL at Nearest
Receiving Land
Use
(dBA)2
Distance to Contour from
Centerline (Feet)
70 dBA
CNEL
65 dBA
CNEL
60 dBA
CNEL
1 Live Oaks Ave w/o Cherry Ave 59.0 RW RW RW
2 Live Oaks Ave e/o Cherry Ave 66.9 RW 40 87
3 Live Oaks Ave n/o Driveway 1 67.0 RW 41 88
4 Live Oaks Ave n/o Goldenrain Dr 66.8 RW 39 85
5 Live Oaks Ave n/o Jurupa Ave 59.2 RW RW RW
6 Cherry Ave n/o Jurupa Ave 66 RW 60 130
7 Cherry Ave s/o Jurupa Ave 64.5 RW RW 104
8 Cherry Ave s/o Live Oaks Ave 65.5 RW 56 120
9 Jurupa Ave w/o Cherry Ave 69.5 RW 131 282
10 Jurupa Ave e/o Cherry Ave 68.3 RW 110 236
11 Jurupa Ave e/o Live Oaks Ave 69.9 RW 141 304
1 Based on a review of existing aerial imagery. Noise sensitive uses limited to existing residential land uses.
2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the nearest receiving
land use.
"RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road.
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
36
TABLE 8-2: EXISTING WITH PROJECT NOISE CONTOURS
ID Road Segment
CNEL at Nearest
Receiving Land
Use
(dBA)2
Distance to Contour from
Centerline (Feet)
70 dBA
CNEL
65 dBA
CNEL
60 dBA
CNEL
1 Live Oaks Ave w/o Cherry Ave 59.0 RW RW RW
2 Live Oaks Ave e/o Cherry Ave 67.6 RW 45 97
3 Live Oaks Ave n/o Driveway 1 67.7 RW 45 97
4 Live Oaks Ave n/o Goldenrain Dr 67.0 RW 41 87
5 Live Oaks Ave n/o Jurupa Ave 59.4 RW RW RW
6 Cherry Ave n/o Jurupa Ave 66.1 RW 62 133
7 Cherry Ave s/o Jurupa Ave 64.9 RW RW 110
8 Cherry Ave s/o Live Oaks Ave 65.6 RW 57 123
9 Jurupa Ave w/o Cherry Ave 69.5 RW 133 286
10 Jurupa Ave e/o Cherry Ave 68.3 RW 110 236
11 Jurupa Ave e/o Live Oaks Ave 70.0 66 142 306
1 Based on a review of existing aerial imagery. Noise sensitive uses limited to existing residential land uses.
2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the nearest receiving
land use.
"RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road.
TABLE 8-3: EAC YEAR 2027 NOISE CONTOURS
ID Road Segment
CNEL at Nearest
Receiving Land
Use
(dBA)2
Distance to Contour from
Centerline (Feet)
70 dBA
CNEL
65 dBA
CNEL
60 dBA
CNEL
1 Live Oaks Ave w/o Cherry Ave 59.4 RW RW RW
2 Live Oaks Ave e/o Cherry Ave 67.4 RW 43 93
3 Live Oaks Ave n/o Driveway 1 67.4 RW 43 94
4 Live Oaks Ave n/o Goldenrain Dr 67.2 RW 42 91
5 Live Oaks Ave n/o Jurupa Ave 59.6 RW RW RW
6 Cherry Ave n/o Jurupa Ave 66.6 RW 67 144
7 Cherry Ave s/o Jurupa Ave 65.1 RW 53 114
8 Cherry Ave s/o Live Oaks Ave 65.9 RW 60 129
9 Jurupa Ave w/o Cherry Ave 71.0 77 165 356
10 Jurupa Ave e/o Cherry Ave 70.1 67 145 312
11 Jurupa Ave e/o Live Oaks Ave 70.5 71 153 329
1 Based on a review of existing aerial imagery. Noise sensitive uses limited to existing residential land uses.
2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the nearest receiving
land use.
"RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road.
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
37
TABLE 8-4: EACP YEAR 2027 NOISE CONTOURS
ID Road Segment
CNEL at Nearest
Receiving Land
Use
(dBA)2
Distance to Contour from
Centerline (Feet)
70 dBA
CNEL
65 dBA
CNEL
60 dBA
CNEL
1 Live Oaks Ave w/o Cherry Ave 59.4 RW RW RW
2 Live Oaks Ave e/o Cherry Ave 68.0 RW 47 102
3 Live Oaks Ave n/o Driveway 1 68.0 RW 48 103
4 Live Oaks Ave n/o Goldenrain Dr 67.4 RW 43 93
5 Live Oaks Ave n/o Jurupa Ave 59.8 RW RW RW
6 Cherry Ave n/o Jurupa Ave 66.7 RW 68 146
7 Cherry Ave s/o Jurupa Ave 65.4 RW 56 120
8 Cherry Ave s/o Live Oaks Ave 66.1 RW 61 132
9 Jurupa Ave w/o Cherry Ave 71.1 78 167 360
10 Jurupa Ave e/o Cherry Ave 70.1 67 145 312
11 Jurupa Ave e/o Live Oaks Ave 70.5 71 154 332
1 Based on a review of existing aerial imagery. Noise sensitive uses limited to existing residential land uses.
2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the nearest receiving
land use.
"RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road.
8.2 EXISTING PROJECT TRAFFIC NOISE LEVELS
Table 8-1 shows the Existing without Project conditions CNEL noise levels. The Existing without Project
exterior noise levels are expected to range from 59.0 to 69.9 dBA CNEL, without accounting for any noise
attenuation features such as noise barriers or topography. Table 8-2 shows the Existing plus Project
conditions will range from 59.0 to 70.0 dBA CNEL. Table 8-5 shows that the Project off-site traffic noise
level increases will range from 0.0 to 0.7 dBA CNEL. Based on the significance criteria for off-site traffic
noise presented in Section 4.2, land uses adjacent to the study area roadway segments would experience
less than significant noise level increases due to unmitigated Project-related traffic noise levels.
8.3 EACP TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL INCREASES
Table 8-3 presents the EAC 2027 without Project conditions CNEL noise levels. The EAC without Project
exterior noise levels are expected to range from 59.4 to 71.0 dBA CNEL, without accounting for any noise
attenuation features such as noise barriers or topography. Table 8-4 shows the EACP conditions will range
from 59.4 to 71.1 dBA CNEL. Table 8-6 shows that the Project off-site traffic noise level increases will
range from 0.0 to 0.6 dBA CNEL. Based on the significance criteria for off-site traffic noise presented in
Section 4.2, land uses adjacent to the study area roadway segments would experience less than significant
noise level increases due to unmitigated Project-related traffic noise levels.
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
38
TABLE 8-5: EXISTING WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC NOISE INCREASES
ID Road Segment Receiving
Land Use1
CNEL at Receiving
Land Use (dBA)2
Incremental Noise Level
Increase Threshold3
No
Project
With
Project
Project
Addition Limit Exceeded?
1 Live Oaks Ave w/o Cherry Ave Residential 59.0 59.0 0.0 5.0 No
2 Live Oaks Ave e/o Cherry Ave Residential 66.9 67.6 0.7 1.5 No
3 Live Oaks Ave n/o Driveway 1 Residential 67.0 67.7 0.7 1.5 No
4 Live Oaks Ave n/o Goldenrain Dr Industrial 66.8 67.0 0.2 1.5 No
5 Live Oaks Ave n/o Jurupa Ave Residential 59.2 59.4 0.2 5.0 No
6 Cherry Ave n/o Jurupa Ave Industrial/Institutional 66.0 66.1 0.1 5.0 No
7 Cherry Ave s/o Jurupa Ave Residential 64.5 64.9 0.4 3.0 No
8 Cherry Ave s/o Live Oaks Ave Residential 65.5 65.6 0.1 1.5 No
9 Jurupa Ave w/o Cherry Ave Residential 69.5 69.5 0.0 1.5 No
10 Jurupa Ave e/o Cherry Ave Residential 68.3 68.3 0.0 1.5 No
11 Jurupa Ave e/o Live Oaks Ave Residential 69.9 70.0 0.1 1.5 No
1 Based on a review of existing aerial imagery. Noise sensitive uses limited to existing residential land uses.
2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the receiving land use.
3 Does the Project create an incremental noise level increase exceeding the significance criteria (Table 4-1)?
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
39
TABLE 8-6: EAC WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC NOISE INCREASES
ID Road Segment Receiving
Land Use1
CNEL at Receiving
Land Use (dBA)2
Incremental Noise Level
Increase Threshold3
No
Project
With
Project
Project
Addition Limit Exceeded?
1 Live Oaks Ave w/o Cherry Ave Residential 59.4 59.4 0.0 5.0 No
2 Live Oaks Ave e/o Cherry Ave Residential 67.4 68.0 0.6 1.5 No
3 Live Oaks Ave n/o Driveway 1 Residential 67.4 68.0 0.6 1.5 No
4 Live Oaks Ave n/o Goldenrain Dr Industrial 67.2 67.4 0.2 5.0 No
5 Live Oaks Ave n/o Jurupa Ave Residential 59.6 59.8 0.2 5.0 No
6 Cherry Ave n/o Jurupa Ave Industrial/Institutional 66.6 66.7 0.1 1.5 No
7 Cherry Ave s/o Jurupa Ave Residential 65.1 65.4 0.3 1.5 No
8 Cherry Ave s/o Live Oaks Ave Residential 65.9 66.1 0.2 1.5 No
9 Jurupa Ave w/o Cherry Ave Residential 71.0 71.1 0.1 1.5 No
10 Jurupa Ave e/o Cherry Ave Residential 70.1 70.1 0.0 1.5 No
11 Jurupa Ave e/o Live Oaks Ave Residential 70.5 70.5 0.0 1.5 No
1 Based on a review of existing aerial imagery. Noise sensitive uses limited to existing residential land uses.
2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the receiving land use.
3 Does the Project create an incremental noise level increase exceeding the significance criteria (Table 4-1)?
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
40
This page intentionally left blank
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
41
9 RECEIVER LOCATIONS
To assess the potential for long-term operational and short-term construction noise impacts, the following
sensitive receiver locations, as shown on Exhibit 9-A, were identified as representative locations for
analysis. Sensitive receivers are generally defined as locations where people reside or where the presence
of unwanted sound could otherwise adversely affect the use of the land. Noise-sensitive land uses are
generally considered to include schools, hospitals, single-family dwellings, mobile home parks, churches,
libraries, and recreation areas. Moderately noise-sensitive land uses typically include multi-family
dwellings, hotels, motels, dormitories, out-patient clinics, cemeteries, golf courses, country clubs,
athletic/tennis clubs, and equestrian clubs. Land uses that are considered relatively insensitive to noise
include business, commercial, and professional developments. Land uses that are typically not affected
by noise include: industrial, manufacturing, utilities, agriculture, undeveloped land, parking lots,
warehousing, liquid and solid waste facilities, salvage yards, and transit terminals.
To describe the potential off-site Project noise levels, three receiver locations in the vicinity of the Project
site were identified. All distances are measured from the Project site boundary to the outdoor living areas
(e.g., private backyards) or at the building façade, whichever is closer to the Project site. The selection of
receiver locations is based on FHWA guidelines and is consistent with additional guidance provided by
Caltrans and the FTA, as previously described in Section 5.2. Other sensitive land uses in the Project study
area that are located at greater distances than those identified in this noise study will experience lower
noise levels than those presented in this report due to the additional attenuation from distance and the
shielding of intervening structures. Distance is measured in a straight line from the project boundary to
each receiver location.
R1: Location R1 represents the existing noise sensitive residence at 11511 Conifer Court,
approximately 79 feet north of the Project site. Receiver R1 is placed in the private outdoor
living areas (backyards) facing the Project site. A 24-hour noise measurement was taken
near this location, L1, to describe the existing ambient noise environment.
R2: Location R2 represents the existing noise sensitive residence at 11606 Teaberry Court,
approximately 2,807 feet east of the Project site. Receiver R2 is placed in the private outdoor
living areas (backyards) facing the Project site. A 24-hour noise measurement was taken
near this location, L2, to describe the existing ambient noise environment.
R3: Location R3 represents the existing noise sensitive residence at 15016 Long View Drive,
approximately 351 feet southeast of the Project site. Receiver R3 is placed in the private
outdoor living areas (backyards) facing the Project site. A 24-hour noise measurement was
taken near this location, L3, to describe the existing ambient noise environment.
R4: Location R4 represents the existing noise sensitive residence at 14872 Rockridge Lane,
approximately 21 feet south of the Project site. Receiver R4 is placed in the private outdoor
living areas (backyards) facing the Project site. A 24-hour noise measurement was taken
near this location, L4, to describe the existing ambient noise environment.
R5: Location R5 represents the existing noise sensitive residence at 11804 Bronze Lane,
approximately 43 feet south of the Project site. Receiver R5 is placed in the private outdoor
living areas (backyards) facing the Project site. A 24-hour noise measurement was taken
near this location, L4, to describe the existing ambient noise environment.
R6: Location R6 represents the existing noise sensitive Southridge Park at 14501 Live Oak
Avenue, 24 feet south of the Project’s perimeter line. Receiver R6 is placed in an open area
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
42
facing the Project site. A 24-hour noise measurement was taken near this location, L4, to
describe the existing ambient noise environment.
R7: Location R7 represents the existing noise sensitive residence at 14799 Goldenrain Drive,
approximately 89 feet west of the Project site. Receiver R7 is placed in the private outdoor
living areas (backyards) facing the Project site. A 24-hour noise measurement was taken
near this location, L5, to describe the existing ambient noise environment.
EXHIBIT 9-A: RECEIVER LOCATIONS
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
43
10 OPERATIONAL NOISE ANALYSIS
This section analyzes the potential stationary-source operational noise impacts at the nearest receiver
locations, identified in Section 9, resulting from the operation of the proposed Southridge Fontana
Project. Exhibit 10-A identifies the noise source locations used to assess the operational noise levels.
10.1 OPERATIONAL NOISE SOURCES
This operational noise analysis is intended to describe noise level impacts associated with the expected
typical of daytime and nighttime activities at the Project site. To present the potential worst-case noise
conditions, this analysis assumes the Project would be operational 24 hours per day, seven days per week.
The on-site Project-related noise sources are expected to include: air conditioning units and parking lot
vehicle movements.
AIR CONDITIONING UNITS
To assess the noise levels created by the air conditioning units, reference noise levels were taken from
equipment specifications for a 3-ton residential packaged air conditioning unit (Carrier 48VGB24). Each
air conditioning unit was modeled as operating 45 minutes per hour during the daytime and 30 minutes
during the nighttime. For this noise analysis, the air conditioning units are expected to be ground
mounted adjacent to the proposed buildings. The air conditioning units are anticipated to be located 3
feet above the ground level. At a uniform reference distance of 50 feet, each unit would generate a
reference noise level of 44.4 dBA Leq.
PARKING LOT/GARAGE ACTIVITY
To determine the noise levels associated with parking lot vehicle movements, Urban Crossroads collected
reference noise level measurements over a 24-hour period on May 17th, 2017, at the parking lot for the
Panasonic Avionics Corporation in the City of Lake Forest. The peak hour of activity measured over the
24-hour noise level measurement period occurred between 12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m., or the typical lunch
hour for employees working in the area. The measured reference noise level at 50 feet from parking lot
vehicle movements was measured at 44.7 dBA Leq. The parking lot noise levels are mainly due to cars
pulling in and out of spaces during peak lunch hour activity and employees talking. Noise associated with
parking lot vehicle movements is expected to operate for the entire hour (60 minutes).
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
44
EXHIBIT 10-A: OPERATIONAL NOISE SOURCE LOCATIONS
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
45
10.2 REFERENCE NOISE LEVELS
To estimate the operational noise impacts, reference noise level measurements were collected from
similar types of activities to represent the noise levels expected with the development of the proposed
Project. While sound pressure levels (e.g., Leq) quantify in decibels the intensity of given sound sources at
a reference distance, sound power levels (Lw) are connected to the sound source and are independent of
distance. Sound pressure levels vary substantially with distance from the source and diminish because of
intervening obstacles and barriers, air absorption, wind, and other factors. Sound power is the acoustical
energy emitted by the sound source and is an absolute value that is not affected by the environment. The
reference project operational noise levels are based on the Project related noise sources shown on Exhibit
10-A. The reference Project operational sound power levels are summarized in Table 10-1.
TABLE 10-1: REFERENCE NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
Noise Source
Noise
Source
Height
(Feet)
Source
Type
Min./Hour2 Reference
Noise Level
(dBA Leq)
@ 50 Feet
Sound
Power
Level
(dBA)3 Day Night
3-ton AC 3' Point 45 30 44.4 76.0
Parking Lot Activities1 3' Point 60 30 41.8 73.4
1 As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc.
2 Anticipated duration (minutes within the hour) of noise activity during typical hourly conditions expected at the Project site.
"Daytime" = 7:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m.; "Nighttime" = 10:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m.
3 Sound power level represents the total amount of acoustical energy (noise level) produced by a sound source independent of
distance or surroundings. Sound power levels calculated using the CadnaA noise model at the reference distance to the noise
source. Numbers may vary due to size differences between point and area noise sources.
10.3 CADNAA NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
To fully describe the exterior operational noise levels from the Project, Urban Crossroads, Inc. developed
a noise prediction model using the CadnaA (Computer Aided Noise Abatement) computer program.
CadnaA can analyze multiple types of noise sources using the spatially accurate Project site plan,
georeferenced Nearmap aerial imagery, topography, buildings, and barriers in its calculations to predict
outdoor noise levels.
Using the ISO 9613 protocol, CadnaA will calculate the distance from each noise source to the noise
receiver locations, using the ground absorption, distance, and barrier/building attenuation inputs to
provide a summary of noise level at each receiver and the partial noise level contributions by noise source.
Consistent with the ISO 9613 protocol, the CadnaA noise prediction model relies on the reference sound
power level (Lw) to describe individual noise sources. While sound pressure levels (e.g., Leq) quantify in
decibels the intensity of given sound sources at a reference distance, sound power levels (Lw) are
connected to the sound source and are independent of distance. Sound pressure levels vary substantially
with distance from the source and diminish because of intervening obstacles and barriers, air absorption,
wind, and other factors. Sound power is the acoustical energy emitted by the sound source and is an
absolute value that is not affected by the environment.
The operational noise level calculations provided in this noise study account for the distance attenuation
provided due to geometric spreading, when sound from a localized stationary source (i.e., a point source)
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
46
propagates uniformly outward in a spherical pattern. A default ground attenuation factor of 0.5 was used
in the noise analysis to account for simi-hard ground surfaces.
10.4 PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVELS
Using the reference noise levels to represent the proposed Project operations that include air conditioning
units and parking lot vehicle movements, Urban Crossroads, Inc. calculated the operational source noise
levels that are expected to be generated at the Project site and the Project-related noise level increases
that would be experienced at each of the sensitive receiver locations. Table 10-2 shows the Project
operational noise levels during the daytime hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. The daytime hourly noise
levels at the off-site receiver locations are expected to range from 27.3 to 48.2 dBA Leq.
TABLE 10-2: DAYTIME PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVELS
Noise Source1
Operational Noise Levels by Receiver Location
(dBA Leq)
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7
Air Conditioning 9.9 4.2 11.5 22.0 20.9 19.7 13.4
Parking Lot Activity 34.0 27.3 35.4 48.2 45.1 40.4 43.2
Total (All Noise Sources) 34.0 27.3 35.4 48.2 45.1 40.4 43.2
1 See Exhibit 10-A for the noise source locations. CadnaA noise model calculations are included in Appendix 10.1.
Table 10-3 shows the Project operational noise levels during the nighttime hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00
a.m. The nighttime hourly noise levels at the off-site receiver locations are expected to range from 24.6
to 45.5 dBA Leq. Appendix 10.1 includes the detailed noise model inputs used to estimate the Project
operational noise levels.
TABLE 10-3: NIGHTTIME PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVELS
Noise Source
Operational Noise Levels by Receiver Location
(dBA Leq)
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7
Air Conditioning 5.9 0.2 7.5 18.0 16.9 15.7 9.4
Parking Lot Activity 31.3 24.6 32.7 45.5 42.4 37.6 40.5
Total (All Noise Sources) 31.3 24.6 32.7 45.5 42.4 37.6 40.5
1 See Exhibit 9-A for the noise source locations. CadnaA noise model calculations are included in Appendix 10.1.
10.5 PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL COMPLIANCE
To demonstrate compliance with local noise regulations, the Project-only operational noise levels are
evaluated against exterior noise level thresholds based on the City of Fontana exterior noise level
standards at nearby noise-sensitive receiver locations. Table 10-4 shows the operational noise levels
associated with Southridge Fontana Project will satisfy the City of Fontana 70 dBA Leq daytime and 65 dBA
Leq nighttime exterior noise level standards at the nearest receiver locations. Therefore, the operational
noise impacts are considered less than significant at the nearby noise-sensitive receiver locations.
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
47
TABLE 10-4: OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL COMPLIANCE
Receiver
Location1
Project Operational Noise
Levels
(dBA Leq)2
Noise Level Standards
(dBA Leq)3
Noise Level Standards
Exceeded?4
Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime
R1 34.0 31.3 70 65 No No
R2 27.3 24.6 70 65 No No
R3 35.4 32.7 70 65 No No
R4 48.2 45.5 70 65 No No
R5 45.1 42.4 70 65 No No
R6 40.4 37.6 70 65 No No
R7 43.2 40.5 70 65 No No
1 See Exhibit 9-A for the receiver locations.
2 Proposed Project operational noise levels as shown on Table 10-1.
3 City of Fontana Municipal Code, 30-543 (Appendix 3.1)
4 Do the estimated Project operational noise source activities exceed the noise level standards?
"Daytime" = 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.; "Nighttime" = 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.
10.6 PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL INCREASES
To describe the Project operational noise level increases, the Project operational noise levels are
combined with the existing ambient noise levels measurements for the nearby receiver locations
potentially impacted by Project operational noise sources. Since the units used to measure noise, decibels
(dB), are logarithmic units, the Project-operational and existing ambient noise levels cannot be combined
using standard arithmetic equations. (1) Instead, they must be logarithmically added using the following
base equation:
SPLTotal = 10log10[10SPL1/10 + 10SPL2/10 + … 10SPLn/10]
Where “SPL1,” “SPL2,” etc. are equal to the sound pressure levels being combined, or in this case, the
Project-operational and existing ambient noise levels. The difference between the combined Project and
ambient noise levels describes the Project noise level increases to the existing ambient noise
environment.
As indicated on Tables 10-5, the Project will generate an unmitigated daytime operational noise level
increase ranging up to 0.3 dBA Leq at the nearest receiver locations. Table 10-6 shows that the Project will
generate an unmitigated nighttime operational noise level increase ranging up to 2.8 dBA Leq at the
nearest receiver locations. As indicated on Tables 10-5 and 10-6, the Project-related operational noise
level increases will satisfy the noise level increase significance criteria presented on Table 4-1. Therefore,
the incremental Project operational noise level increases are considered less than significant at all receiver
locations.
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
48
TABLE 10-5: DAYTIME PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL INCREASES
Receiver
Location1
Total Project
Operational
Noise Level2
Measurement
Location3
Reference
Ambient
Noise
Levels4
Combined
Project
and
Ambient5
Project
Increase6
Increase
Criteria
Increase
Criteria
Exceeded?
R1 34.0 L1 61.3 61.3 0.0 3.0 No
R2 27.3 L2 57.3 57.3 0.0 5.0 No
R3 35.4 L3 46.6 46.9 0.3 5.0 No
R4 48.2 L4 60.0 60.3 0.3 1.5 No
R5 45.1 L4 60.0 60.1 0.1 1.5 No
R6 40.4 L4 60.0 60.0 0.0 1.5 No
R7 43.2 L5 68.7 68.7 0.0 1.5 No
1 See Exhibit 9-A for the receiver locations.
2 Total Project daytime operational noise levels as shown on Table 10-2.
3 Reference noise level measurement locations as shown on Exhibit 5-A.
4 Observed daytime ambient noise levels as shown on Table 5-1.
5 Represents the combined ambient conditions plus the Project activities.
6 The noise level increase expected with the addition of the proposed Project activities.
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
49
TABLE 10-6: NIGHTTIME OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL INCREASES
Receiver
Location1
Total Project
Operational
Noise Level2
Measurement
Location3
Reference
Ambient
Noise
Levels4
Combined
Project
and
Ambient5
Project
Increase6
Increase
Criteria
Increase
Criteria
Exceeded?
R1 31.3 L1 54.4 54.4 0.0 5.0 No
R2 24.6 L2 57.9 57.9 0.0 5.0 No
R3 32.7 L2 57.9 57.9 0.0 5.0 No
R4 45.5 L3 46.0 48.8 2.8 5.0 No
R5 42.4 L4 47.8 48.9 1.1 5.0 No
R6 37.6 L5 63.6 63.6 0.0 3.0 No
R7 40.5 L4 47.8 48.5 0.7 5.0 No
1 See Exhibit 9-A for the receiver locations.
2 Total Project nighttime operational noise levels as shown on Table 10-3.
3 Reference noise level measurement locations as shown on Exhibit 5-A.
4 Observed nighttime ambient noise levels as shown on Table 5-1.
5 Represents the combined ambient conditions plus the Project activities.
6 The noise level increase expected with the addition of the proposed Project activities.
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
50
This page intentionally left blank
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
51
11 CONSTRUCTION ANALYSIS
This section analyzes potential impacts resulting from the short-term construction activities associated
with the development of the Project. Exhibits 11-A, 11-B, and 11-C shows the boundaries for typical
construction, rock crushing, and blasting activities, respectively, in relation to the nearby sensitive receiver
locations previously described in Section 6. City of Fontana Municipal Code Section 18-63(7), states that
project construction noise levels are considered exempt between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on weekdays
and between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays.
If Project construction activity occurs outside of the hours specified in the Municipal Code, noise levels
shall satisfy the City of Fontana construction noise level thresholds of 70 dBA Leq during the daytime hours
and 65 dBA Leq during the nighttime hours.
11.1 TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVELS
Noise generated by the Project construction equipment will typically include a combination of trucks,
power tools, concrete mixers, and portable generators that when combined can reach high levels. The
number and mix of construction equipment are expected to occur in the following stages:
Site Preparation
Grading
Building Construction
Paving
Architectural Coating
11.2 TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION REFERENCE NOISE LEVELS
To describe peak construction noise activities, this construction noise analysis was prepared using
reference noise level measurements published in the Road Construction Noise Model (RCNM) by the
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) (25). The FHWA model provides a comprehensive source of
reference construction noise levels. Table 11-1 provides a summary of the RCNM construction reference
noise level measurements expressed in hourly average dBA Leq using the estimated RCNM usage factors
(25) to describe the construction activities for each stage of Project construction.
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
52
EXHIBIT 11-A: CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND RECEIVER LOCATIONS
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
53
EXHIBIT 11-B: ROCK CRUSHING ACTIVITY AND RECEIVER LOCATIONS
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
54
EXHIBIT 11-C: BLASTING ACTIVITY AND RECEIVER LOCATIONS
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
55
TABLE 11-1: TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION REFERENCE NOISE LEVELS
Construction
Stage
Reference
Construction
Equipmnet1
Reference Noise
Level @ 50 Feet
(dBA Leq)
Composite Reference
Noise Level
(dBA Leq)
Site
Preparation
Dozer 78.0
82.9 Front End Loader 75.0
Scraper 80.0
Grading
Backhoe 74.0
82.8 Compactor (ground) 76.0
Grader 81.0
Building
Construction
Crane 73.0
79.7 Generator 78.0
Generator (<25kVA) 70.0
Paving
Paver 74.0
77.8 Dump Truck 72.0
Roller 73.0
Architectural
Coating
Man Lift 68.0
76.2 Compressor (air) 74.0
Generator (<25kVA) 70.0
1 FHWA Road Construction Noise Model.
11.3 TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION NOISE ANALYSIS
Table 11-2 shows the Project construction equipment reference noise levels used in this analysis and the
resulting Project-related construction noise levels at each receiver location when the highest reference
noise level is operating at a single point nearest each sensitive receiver location. Table 11-2 shows that
the Project-related construction noise levels will range from 41.0 to 67.1 dBA Leq at the sensitive receiver
locations in the City of Fontana.
11.4 TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVEL COMPLIANCE
To evaluate whether the Project will generate potentially significant short-term noise levels at nearest
residential receiver locations, a construction-related daytime noise level threshold of 80 dBA Leq is used
as a reasonable threshold to assess the daytime construction noise level impacts. The construction noise
analysis shows that the nearest residential receiver locations will satisfy the daytime 80 dBA Leq
significance threshold during Project construction activities as shown on Table 8-3. Therefore, the noise
impacts due to Project construction noise is considered less than significant.
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
56
TABLE 11-2: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT NOISE LEVEL SUMMARY
Receiver
Location1
Construction Noise Levels (dBA Leq)
Site
Preparation Grading Building
Construction Paving Architectural
Coating
Highest
Levels2
R1 60.4 60.9 54.3 54.8 53.1 60.9
R2 48.3 48.8 42.2 42.7 41.0 48.8
R3 56.0 56.5 49.9 50.4 48.7 56.5
R4 66.6 67.1 60.5 61.0 59.3 67.1
R5 65.3 65.8 59.2 59.7 58.0 65.8
R6 64.7 65.2 58.6 59.1 57.4 65.2
R7 62.7 63.2 56.6 57.1 55.4 63.2
1 Construction noise source and receiver locations are shown on Exhibit 11-A.
2 Construction noise level calculations based on distance from the project site boundaries (construction activity area)
to nearby receiver locations. CadnaA construction noise model inputs are included in Appendix 11.1.
TABLE 11-3: TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVEL COMPLIANCE
Receiver
Location1
Construction Noise Levels (dBA Leq)
Highest Construction
Noise Levels2 Threshold3 Threshold
Exceeded?4
R1 60.9 80 No
R2 48.8 80 No
R3 56.5 80 No
R4 67.1 80 No
R5 65.8 80 No
R6 65.2 80 No
R7 63.2 80 No
1 Noise receiver locations are shown on Exhibit 11-A.
2 Highest construction noise level operating at the Project site boundary to nearby receiver locations (Table 11-2).
3 Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual.
4 Do the estimated Project construction noise levels exceed the construction noise level threshold?
11.5 ROCK CRUSHING CONSTRUCTION REFERENCE NOISE LEVELS
This analysis assesses the potential noise level impacts due to rock crushing activities planned near the
northern Project site boundary. Exhibit 11-B shows the location of the planned rock crushing activity area
in relation to the receiver locations.
The rock crushing construction noise analysis was prepared using reference construction equipment noise
levels from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) published in the Roadway Construction Noise
Model (RCNM), which includes a national database of construction equipment reference noise emission
levels. (26) Table 11-4 provides a summary of the reference average Leq noise levels used to describe rock
crushing construction activities. The reference noise level summary describes construction activity noise
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
57
levels with multiple pieces of rock construction equipment operating simultaneously and includes source
noise levels for a hoe ram or breaker representing a percussion hammer fitted to an excavator for breaking
rock. Appendix 11.2 includes the detailed CadnaA rock crushing noise model inputs.
TABLE 11-4: ROCK CRUSHING CONSTRUCTION REFERENCE NOISE LEVELS
Construction
Stage
Reference
Construction Activity1
Reference Noise
Level @ 50 Feet
(dBA Leq)
Combined
Noise Level
(dBA Leq)2
Sound Power
Leve
(dBA Lw)
Rock
Crushing
Rock Crusher 891
90 121.6 Front End Loader 752
Hoe Ram 832
1 University District Rock Crusher Conditional Use Permit, 2011.
2 FHWA's Roadway Construction Noise Model, January 2006.
3 Represents the combined noise level for all equipment assuming they operate at the same time consistent with FTA
Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment guidance for general construction noise assessment.
11.6 ROCK CRUSHING CONSTRUCTION NOISE ANALYSIS AND COMPLIANCE
Using the reference RCNM construction equipment noise levels in Table 11-6 and the CadnaA noise
prediction model, calculations of the Project construction noise level impacts at nearest sensitive receiver
locations were completed. As shown on Table 11-7, the rock crushing construction noise levels are
estimated to range from 44.8 to 54.5 dBA Leq at the nearest receiver locations. The rock crushing
construction noise analysis shows that the receiver locations will satisfy the 80 dBA Leq significance
threshold during Project construction activities. Therefore, the noise impacts due to Project rock crushing
activities is considered less than significant at all receiver locations.
TABLE 11-5: ROCK CRUSHING CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT NOISE LEVEL SUMMARY
Receiver
Location1
Construction Noise Levels (dBA Leq)
Rock Crushing
R1 51.0
R2 44.8
R3 49.6
R4 54.0
R5 54.5
R6 52.7
R7 53.7
1 Construction noise source and receiver locations are shown
on Exhibit 11-A.
2 Construction noise level calculations based on distance
from the project site boundaries (construction activity area)
to nearby receiver locations. CadnaA construction noise
model inputs are included in Appendix 11.1.
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
58
11.7 CONSTRUCTION VIBRATION ANALYSIS
Construction activity and rock crushing can result in varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on
the equipment and methods employed. Operation of construction equipment causes ground vibrations
that spread through the ground and diminish in strength with distance. Ground vibration levels associated
with various types of construction equipment are summarized on Table 11-6. Based on the representative
vibration levels presented for various construction equipment types, it is possible to estimate the
potential for building damage using the following vibration assessment methods defined by the Caltrans.
To describe the vibration impacts the Caltrans provides the following equation: PPVequip = PPVref x (25/D)1.5
TABLE 11-6: VIBRATION SOURCE LEVELS FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
Equipment PPV (in/sec)
at 25 feet
Small bulldozer 0.003
Jackhammer 0.035
Loaded Trucks 0.076
Large bulldozer 0.089
Source: Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual
Table 11-87 presents the expected Project related vibration levels at the nearest receiver locations. At
distances ranging from 21 to 2,807 feet from Project construction activities, construction vibration
velocity levels are estimated to range up to 0.12 PPV (in/sec). Based on maximum acceptable continuous
vibration threshold of 0.3 PPV (in/sec) for older residential buildings, the typical Project construction
vibration levels will satisfy the building damage thresholds at all receiver locations. In addition, the typical
construction vibration levels at the nearest sensitive receiver locations are unlikely to be sustained during
the entire construction period but will occur rather only during the times that heavy construction
equipment is operating adjacent to the Project site boundaries.
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
59
TABLE 11-7: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT VIBRATION LEVELS
Receiver
Location1
Distance
to Const.
Activity
(Feet)2
Typical Construction Vibration Levels
PPV (in/sec)3 Thresholds
PPV
(in/sec)4
Thresholds
Exceeded?5 Small
bulldozer
Jack-
hammer
Loaded
Trucks
Large
Bulldozer
Highest
Vibration
Level
R1 79' 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.30 No
R2 2,807' 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 No
R3 351' 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 No
R4 21' 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.12 0.12 0.30 No
R5 43' 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.30 No
R6 24' 0.00 0.04 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.30 No
R7 89' 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.30 No
1 Construction receiver locations are shown on Exhibit 11-A.
2 Distance from receiver location to Project construction boundary.
3 Based on the Vibration Source Levels of Construction Equipment (Table 11-4).
4 City of Redlands Municipal Code Section 8.06.020
5 Does the peak vibration exceed the acceptable vibration thresholds?
"PPV" = Peak Particle Velocity
11.8 BLASTING NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACTS
If blasting is determined to be required during excavation and grading, the blasting contractor is required
to obtain blasting permit(s) from the County, and to notify City of Fontana Police/Fire Department within
24 hours of planned blasting events. Air overpressure regulations are identified by the U.S. Bureau of
Mines and the ISEE’s Blasters’ Handbook. (9)
A blasting contractor would be required to complete all blasting-related activities in compliance with
applicable regulations of the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department, the U.S. Bureau of Mines, the
California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal-OHSA), the Department of Homeland Security,
and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF). As required by law a licensed blasting
contractor would be responsible for performing and supervising all blasting activities, including the
following:
1) Drill pattern design;
2) Pre-blast inspection;
3) Loading of explosives;
4) Pre-blast notifications and warning signaling;
5) Blasting safety procedures;
6) Blasting site security;
7) Post-blast inspections and re-entry procedures; and
8) Blast log and history.
Explosives used for blasting usually consist of a primer, secondary explosive, and an initiator. The blasting
contractor would most likely use a high explosive Ammonia Gelatin as a primer for each shot and
ammonium nitrate mixed with fuel oil (ANFO) as the primary blasting agent. Non-electric blasting caps are
typically used to initiate the blasting agent. The charges are time delayed by at least 8-milliseconds.
Delays between charges are used to decouple changes and reduce vibration.
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
60
Pattern blasting is a common technique used in blasting for construction. This method is used when rock
materials occur over a wide area. Pattern blasting involves drilling holes in a pre-designed pattern. The
depth and spacing of holes is controlled to provide the maximum fracture with the minimum amount of
ground shaking.
Blasting patterns typically consist of drill holes between two and five inches in diameter. Depth of the drill
holes would be determined by the blasting contractor and is specific to each application. Blasting patterns
on construction sites typically range from three feet by three feet to 12 feet by 12 feet.
The Blasting Engineer would control blasting-induced vibration and noise. General control measures
include:
1) Stemming shall be of uniform size in order to ensure consistency between individual shots;
2) The weight of explosives used per delay shall be determined by adherence to the Scaled Distance
Equation;
3) Independent delays shall be used for each blast hole to control vibration; and
4) Blasting shall not take place when wind velocity equals or exceeds 15 miles per hour. A licensed
blasting contractor will determine wind speed through the use of a recording anemometer
located a minimum of ten feet above ground level.
In addition, ground vibrations and air overpressure shall be monitored during each blast for compliance
with the limits by the U.S. Bureau of Mines. Following each blast, seismographs shall be checked to ensure
that the blasting has not exceeded relevant standards. The relevant standards are as follows:
1) Pursuant to 30 CFR Ch. VII, §816.67(b)(1)(i) of U.S. Bureau of Mines publication RI8485, airblasts
shall not exceed 133 dB at the location of any dwelling, public building, school, church, or
community or institutional building outside the permit area.
2) Pursuant to 30 CFR Ch. VII, §816.67(d)(2)(i) of U.S. Bureau of Mines publication RI8508, the
maximum ground vibration shall not exceed the limits in said section at the location of any
dwelling, public building, school, church, or community or institutional building outside the permit
area.
While there are specific blasting regulations and standards that have been designed to ensure that
adverse impacts would not result from blasting operations, as there is no specific information on how
much blasting would occur, the Project’s compliance with such federal and state regulations cannot be
verified in this analysis. Therefore, if blasting is required, the project should implement Noise-1 to
demonstrate any required blasting activities comply with the thresholds in this analysis:
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
61
Noise-1: Where blasting is required, the following measures should be employed:
1) Blasting will be conducted only between the hours of 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on weekdays only.
Explosives will not be detonated on weekends or the following holidays: New Year’s Day, Memorial
Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day.
2) All blasting will be done by a licensed blaster.
3) Pursuant to 30 CFR Ch. VII, §816.67(b)(1)(i) of U.S. Bureau of Mines publication RI8485, airblasts
shall not exceed 133 dB at the location of any dwelling, public building, school, church, or
community or institutional building.
4) Pursuant to 30 CFR Ch. VII, §816.67(d)(2)(i) of U.S. Bureau of Mines publication RI8508, the
maximum ground vibration shall not exceed the limits in said section at the location of any dwelling,
public building, school, church, or community or institutional building outside the permit area.
5) Blasting Notification
a) All owners of non-vacant property within ¼ mile of the blast location will be notified at least 24
hours prior to blasting.
b) Notify the County of San Bernardino Sherriff’s Department at least 24 hours prior to blasting.
6) A record of notifications will be maintained and will be available for inspection by the County of San
Bernardino.
7) All persons who conduct blasting operations will comply with all applicable State and federal laws
governing the use and storage of explosives.
8) Blasting will be conducted in a manner that prevents injury to persons and damage to public or
private property outside the project area.
9) A record of each blast will be made and provided to the County of San Bernardino within one week
of the blast. The record is to be completed by the end of the workday during which the blast
occurred, including the seismograph reading, if available, and will contain the following:
a) Name of operator conducting the blast.
b) The location, date and time of the blast.
c) Name, signature and license number of the licensed blaster.
d) Type of material blasted.
e) Number of holes, burden and spacing.
f) Diameter and depth of holes.
g) Type of explosives used.
h) Total weight of explosives used.
i) Weight of explosives per hole.
j) Maximum weight of explosives detonated within any eight (8) millisecond period.
k) Maximum number of holes or decks detonated within any eight (8) millisecond period.
l) Initiation system, including number of circuits and the time interval, if sequential timer is used.
m) Type and length of stemming (deck and top).
n) Type and detonator and delay periods used, in milliseconds.
o) Distance and scaled distance to the closest protected structure.
p) Maximum peak particle velocity will not exceed limits as set by U.S. Bureau of Mines 8507 Report
at the location of any dwelling, public building, school, church or community or institutional
building outside the blast area.
10) All blasting will be done with small charges and with the following protective best management
practices, whenever feasible:
11) Two to four feet of rippable material will be left over the solid material to be blasted to serve as a
cover to prevent excessive fly rock. Blasting mats may be used if overburden is not available. The
blasting mats must be of suitable size and material to dampen noise and contain blasted materials.
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
62
12) The size of the shot will be limited by sound and vibration control levels and amount of area that
can be blasted with good results.
13) Small diameter drilling with high-speed equipment will be used to reduce the amount of explosives
used in each hole.
14) The use of delay blasting techniques will be used to reduce vibrations associated with the blast.
15) Material stockpiles will be placed, if available to help block blasting and material processing noise
transmission off-site.
16) Blasting shots will be designed to minimize ground vibration and air blast.
17) Blasting will not occur during adverse weather conditions, such as high winds, unless a loaded
charge must be detonated before the end of the day for safety reasons.
With the implementation of Noise-1, impacts related to vibration from blasting would result in a less-
than-significant impact.
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
63
12 REFERENCES
1. California Department of Transportation Environmental Program. Technical Noise Supplement - A
Technical Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol. Sacramento, CA : s.n., September 2013.
2. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Noise Abatement and Control. Information on Levels of
Environmental Noise Requisite to Protect Public Health and Welfare with an Adequate Margin of
Safety. March 1974. EPA/ONAC 550/9/74-004.
3. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Environment and
Planning, Noise and Air Quality Branch. Highway Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement Policy and
Guidance. December 2011.
4. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Highway Traffic Noise in the
United States, Problem and Response. April 2000. p. 3.
5. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Noise Abatement and Control. Noise Effects
Handbook-A Desk Reference to Health and Welfare Effects of Noise. October 1979 (revised July 1981).
EPA 550/9/82/106.
6. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact
Assessment Manual, FTA Report No. 0123. September 2018.
7. California Department of Transportation. Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance
Manual. April 2020.
8. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact
Assessment Manual, FTA-VA-90-1003-06. May 2006.
9. International Society of Explosives Engineer's. Blasters' Handbook, 18th Edition, Fourth Printing. 2020.
10. Office of Planning and Research. State of California General Plan Guidelines. October 2017.
11. State of California. California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, Volume 1, Chapter 12, Section
1206.4, Allowable Interior Noise Level. ICC Digital Coes. [Online] 2019.
https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/CABCV12019/chapter-12-interior-environment.
12. —. 2019 California Green Building Standards Code. January 2019.
13. City of Fontana. General Plan Noise Element. November 2018.
14. —. Zoning and Development Code, Section 30, Article V - Residential Zoning Districts, Division 6 -
Performance Standards.
15. —. Municipal Code, Chapter 18, Article II - Noise.
16. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. Transit Noise and Vibration
Impact Assessment Manual. September 2018.
17. —. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual. September 2018.
18. City of Ontario. Ontario International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. July 2018.
19. State of California. California Environmental Quality Act, Environmental Checklist Form Appendix G.
2019.
20. American National Standards Institute (ANSI). Specification for Sound Level Meters ANSI S1.4-
2014/IEC 61672-1:2013.
21. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. FHWA Highway Traffic Noise
Prediction Model. December 1978. FHWA-RD-77-108.
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
64
22. California Department of Transportation Environmental Program, Office of Environmental
Engineering. Use of California Vehicle Noise Reference Energy Mean Emission Levels (Calveno REMELs)
in FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction. September 1995. TAN 95-03.
23. California Department of Transportation. Traffic Noise Attenuation as a Function of Ground and
Vegetation Final Report. June 1995. FHWA/CA/TL-95/23.
24. Urban Crossroads, Inc. Southridge Fontana (PAM21-0081) Traffic Analysis. 2022.
25. FHWA. Roadway Construction Noise Model. January 2006.
26. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Environment and
Planning. FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model. January, 2006.
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
65
13 CERTIFICATION
The contents of this noise study report represent an accurate depiction of the noise environment and
impacts associated with the proposed Southridge Fontana Project. The information contained in this
noise study report is based on the best available data at the time of preparation. If you have any questions,
please contact me directly at (619) 788-1971.
William Maddux
Senior Associate
URBAN CROSSROADS, INC.
(619) 788-1971
bmaddux@urbanxroads.com
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science in Urban and Regional Planning
California Polytechnic State University, Pomona • June 2000
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
ASA – Acoustical Society of America
APA – American Planning Association
AWMA – Air and Waste Management Association
PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS
Approved Acoustical Consultant • County of San Diego
FHWA Traffic Noise Model of Training • November 2004
CadnaA Basic and Advanced Training Certificate • October 2008.
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
66
This page intentionally left blank
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
APPENDIX 3.1:
CITY OF FONTANA MUNICIPAL CODE
67
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
This page intentionally left blank
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
APPENDIX 5.1:
NOISE MEASUREMENT PHOTOS
75
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
This page intentionally left blank
76
JN: 14713 Study Area Photos
L1_E
34, 2' 38.130000"117, 28' 50.700000"
L1_N
34, 2' 38.260000"117, 28' 50.700000"
L1_S
34, 2' 38.200000"117, 28' 50.730000"
L1_W
34, 2' 38.120000"117, 28' 50.700000"
L2_E
34, 2' 32.810000"117, 28' 18.820000"
L2_N
34, 2' 32.820000"117, 28' 18.820000"
77
JN: 14713 Study Area Photos
L2_S
34, 2' 32.820000"117, 28' 18.760000"
L2_W
34, 2' 32.850000"117, 28' 18.840000"
L3_E
34, 2' 14.010000"117, 28' 38.340000"
L3_N
34, 2' 14.030000"117, 28' 38.400000"
L3_S
34, 2' 13.990000"117, 28' 38.340000"
L3_W
34, 2' 14.050000"117, 28' 38.340000"
78
JN: 14713 Study Area Photos
L4_E
34, 2' 18.730000"117, 29' 2.840000"
L4_N
34, 2' 18.780000"117, 29' 2.820000"
L4_S
34, 2' 18.760000"117, 29' 2.870000"
L4_W
34, 2' 18.730000"117, 29' 2.870000"
L5_E
34, 2' 33.310000"117, 28' 57.870000"
L5_N
34, 2' 33.440000"117, 28' 57.870000"
79
JN: 14713 Study Area Photos
L5_S
34, 2' 33.340000"117, 28' 57.790000"
L5_W
34, 2' 33.310000"117, 28' 57.930000"
80
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
APPENDIX 5.2:
NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENT WORKSHEETS
81
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
This page intentionally left blank
82
Date:Location:Meter:Piccolo II JN:14713
Project:Southbridge Fontana Source:Analyst:A. Khan
Timeframe Hour L eq Lmax Lmin L1%L2%L5%L8%L25%L50%L90%L95%L99%Leq Adj.Adj. L eq
0 50.6 78.7 41.8 78.4 77.6 73.5 68.0 50.7 44.2 42.4 42.1 41.9 50.6 10.0 60.6
1 52.6 64.8 43.0 64.4 63.7 60.7 57.2 47.2 44.2 43.4 43.2 43.0 52.6 10.0 62.6
2 50.3 61.9 44.5 61.3 60.2 56.6 53.9 48.6 46.2 44.9 44.8 44.6 50.3 10.0 60.3
3 52.5 65.5 45.5 64.9 63.5 59.0 55.7 48.9 47.2 45.9 45.7 45.6 52.5 10.0 62.5
4 54.7 66.9 46.8 66.5 65.5 61.7 58.4 52.0 49.0 47.3 47.1 46.9 54.7 10.0 64.7
5 55.1 67.2 48.7 66.7 65.6 61.8 58.4 52.4 50.5 49.2 49.0 48.8 55.1 10.0 65.1
6 59.9 72.1 49.9 71.8 71.0 67.4 64.6 56.4 52.6 50.5 50.3 50.0 59.9 10.0 69.9
7 62.1 74.1 50.1 73.6 72.5 69.5 67.1 59.8 54.4 50.9 50.6 50.2 62.1 0.0 62.1
8 61.1 74.2 46.9 73.5 72.8 68.7 66.4 56.3 51.0 47.6 47.4 47.0 61.1 0.0 61.1
9 58.4 70.6 45.5 70.0 69.2 66.4 63.4 55.5 49.6 46.4 46.0 45.6 58.4 0.0 58.4
10 61.2 73.8 47.8 73.5 72.7 69.4 66.3 54.8 51.3 48.8 48.5 48.0 61.2 0.0 61.2
11 60.6 74.8 43.7 73.7 72.1 67.9 65.3 54.3 48.8 45.3 44.7 44.1 60.6 0.0 60.6
12 59.6 76.1 41.6 75.4 74.3 70.3 66.5 57.7 48.3 43.1 42.5 41.7 59.6 0.0 59.6
13 57.5 69.0 41.9 68.7 68.0 65.2 62.9 55.1 49.8 43.9 43.0 42.0 57.5 0.0 57.5
14 64.6 78.7 42.1 77.9 76.7 71.9 68.5 58.3 51.8 44.2 43.2 42.3 64.6 0.0 64.6
15 63.9 77.0 41.7 76.4 75.5 71.7 68.5 58.4 51.3 43.4 42.7 41.9 63.9 0.0 63.9
16 62.0 75.0 42.0 74.3 73.5 70.1 66.6 57.8 50.5 44.2 43.1 42.2 62.0 0.0 62.0
17 59.5 71.3 43.6 70.9 69.9 67.2 65.0 57.4 50.7 44.9 44.4 43.8 59.5 0.0 59.5
18 62.5 76.9 44.3 76.1 74.5 69.7 65.5 56.3 50.2 45.4 44.9 44.4 62.5 0.0 62.5
19 63.4 78.4 44.5 77.3 75.6 70.6 66.1 55.8 50.3 45.5 45.1 44.6 63.4 5.0 68.4
20 56.2 68.4 45.5 68.0 67.0 63.3 60.4 53.5 50.2 46.4 46.1 45.6 56.2 5.0 61.2
21 56.2 67.3 45.7 67.0 66.4 63.7 61.4 54.1 50.4 46.6 46.2 45.8 56.2 5.0 61.2
22 53.5 65.2 42.0 64.9 64.0 60.9 57.9 50.9 47.9 43.2 42.7 42.1 53.5 10.0 63.5
23 48.8 59.2 42.4 58.9 58.1 55.2 52.7 48.3 45.0 43.0 42.8 42.5 48.8 10.0 58.8
Timeframe Hour L eq Lmax Lmin L1%L2%L5%L8%L25%L50%L90%L95%L99%
Min 56.2 67.3 41.6 67.0 66.4 63.3 60.4 53.5 48.3 43.1 42.5 41.7
Max 64.6 78.7 50.1 77.9 76.7 71.9 68.5 59.8 54.4 50.9 50.6 50.2
61.3 73.1 72.1 68.4 65.3 56.3 50.6 45.8 45.2 44.6
Min 48.8 59.2 41.8 58.9 58.1 55.2 52.7 47.2 44.2 42.4 42.1 41.9
Max 59.9 78.7 49.9 78.4 77.6 73.5 68.0 56.4 52.6 50.5 50.3 50.0
54.4 66.4 65.5 61.9 58.5 50.6 47.4 45.5 45.3 45.0
24-Hour Noise Level Measurement Summary
Hourly Leq dBA Readings (unadjusted)
Leq (dBA)
Night
Thursday, February 24, 2022 L1 - Located north of the Project site near single-family
residence at 11511 Conifer Court.
Night
Day
Day
Night
Energy Average
Energy Average Average:
Average:
24-Hour Daytime
(7am-10pm)
Nighttime
(10pm-7am)
59.7 61.3 54.4
50
.
6
52
.
6
50
.
3
52
.
5
54
.
7
55
.
1
59
.
9
62
.
1
61
.
1
58
.
4
61
.
2
60
.
6
59
.
6
57
.
5
64
.
6
63
.
9
62
.
0
59
.
5
62
.
5
63
.
4
56
.
2
56
.
2
53
.
5
48
.
8
35.040.045.050.055.060.065.070.075.080.085.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Ho
u
r
l
y
L
eq
(d
B
A
)
Hour Beginning
Z:\Shared\UcJobs\_14600-15000\14700\14713\04_Noise\Fieldwork\Measurement\14713_L1_Q 83
Date:Location:Meter:Piccolo II JN:14713
Project:Southbridge Fontana Source:Analyst:A. Khan
Timeframe Hour L eq Lmax Lmin L1%L2%L5%L8%L25%L50%L90%L95%L99%Leq Adj.Adj. L eq
0 52.5 56.9 49.8 56.5 56.1 55.2 54.6 53.1 51.8 50.5 50.2 49.9 52.5 10.0 62.5
1 52.8 56.2 51.1 55.9 55.6 54.9 54.3 53.1 52.4 51.5 51.4 51.2 52.8 10.0 62.8
2 56.7 59.9 54.9 59.7 59.5 59.0 58.7 57.0 56.2 55.3 55.1 55.0 56.7 10.0 66.7
3 58.0 63.1 56.1 62.7 62.1 60.7 59.9 58.3 57.4 56.6 56.4 56.2 58.0 10.0 68.0
4 59.9 64.5 57.8 64.2 63.9 63.1 62.2 60.3 59.2 58.2 58.1 57.9 59.9 10.0 69.9
5 60.0 64.2 58.1 63.9 63.6 62.6 61.8 60.2 59.4 58.6 58.4 58.2 60.0 10.0 70.0
6 61.1 66.5 58.6 66.0 65.7 64.5 63.7 61.3 60.2 59.1 58.9 58.7 61.1 10.0 71.1
7 61.2 67.5 59.0 67.1 66.4 65.0 64.0 61.0 60.3 59.5 59.3 59.1 61.2 0.0 61.2
8 59.0 63.9 56.9 63.5 63.1 61.9 61.0 59.2 58.3 57.4 57.2 57.0 59.0 0.0 59.0
9 57.3 64.5 53.4 64.1 63.3 61.5 60.5 57.8 55.7 53.9 53.7 53.5 57.3 0.0 57.3
10 57.6 68.3 52.3 67.5 66.5 63.7 61.3 56.4 54.7 53.0 52.7 52.4 57.6 0.0 57.6
11 54.9 62.8 49.8 62.4 61.8 59.8 58.5 55.4 52.9 50.5 50.2 49.9 54.9 0.0 54.9
12 57.2 66.3 51.1 65.8 65.1 63.0 61.3 57.1 54.4 52.2 51.8 51.3 57.2 0.0 57.2
13 56.6 65.5 51.3 64.9 64.0 62.2 60.7 56.4 54.1 52.0 51.7 51.4 56.6 0.0 56.6
14 56.4 63.3 48.4 62.9 62.5 61.7 60.9 57.9 53.4 49.5 49.0 48.5 56.4 0.0 56.4
15 53.2 61.9 46.4 61.3 60.6 58.8 57.1 53.6 50.5 47.2 46.8 46.5 53.2 0.0 53.2
16 54.9 64.7 47.7 64.1 63.3 60.9 58.7 54.7 52.2 48.8 48.4 47.9 54.9 0.0 54.9
17 55.5 65.3 48.6 64.9 64.1 61.3 59.7 55.3 52.6 49.4 49.1 48.8 55.5 0.0 55.5
18 55.5 63.0 51.1 62.3 61.4 59.4 58.5 56.3 54.1 51.9 51.6 51.2 55.5 0.0 55.5
19 57.2 64.1 52.0 63.7 63.1 61.8 60.9 58.1 55.4 52.7 52.4 52.1 57.2 5.0 62.2
20 57.8 63.6 53.1 63.1 62.6 61.7 61.0 58.6 56.7 54.1 53.7 53.3 57.8 5.0 62.8
21 58.8 65.6 53.6 65.1 64.4 63.1 62.4 60.0 57.2 54.3 54.1 53.7 58.8 5.0 63.8
22 57.1 64.9 51.8 64.2 63.2 61.5 60.5 57.8 55.5 52.5 52.3 52.0 57.1 10.0 67.1
23 55.2 59.9 52.5 59.5 59.1 58.1 57.4 56.0 54.5 53.0 52.9 52.6 55.2 10.0 65.2
Timeframe Hour L eq Lmax Lmin L1%L2%L5%L8%L25%L50%L90%L95%L99%
Min 53.2 61.9 46.4 61.3 60.6 58.8 57.1 53.6 50.5 47.2 46.8 46.5
Max 61.2 68.3 59.0 67.5 66.5 65.0 64.0 61.0 60.3 59.5 59.3 59.1
57.3 64.2 63.5 61.7 60.4 57.2 54.8 52.4 52.1 51.8
Min 52.5 56.2 49.8 55.9 55.6 54.9 54.3 53.1 51.8 50.5 50.2 49.9
Max 61.1 66.5 58.6 66.0 65.7 64.5 63.7 61.3 60.2 59.1 58.9 58.7
57.9 61.4 61.0 60.0 59.2 57.5 56.3 55.0 54.9 54.6
Day
Night
Energy Average
Energy Average Average:
Average:
24-Hour Daytime
(7am-10pm)
Nighttime
(10pm-7am)
57.6 57.3 57.9
24-Hour Noise Level Measurement Summary
Hourly Leq dBA Readings (unadjusted)
Leq (dBA)
Night
Thursday, February 24, 2022 L2 - Located east of the Project site near single-family
residence at 11605 Teaberry Court.
Night
Day
52
.
5
52
.
8 56
.
7
58
.
0
59
.
9
60
.
0
61
.
1
61
.
2
59
.
0
57
.
3
57
.
6
54
.
9
57
.
2
56
.
6
56
.
4
53
.
2
54
.
9
55
.
5
55
.
5
57
.
2
57
.
8
58
.
8
57
.
1
55
.
2
35.040.045.050.055.060.065.070.075.080.085.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Ho
u
r
l
y
L
eq
(d
B
A
)
Hour Beginning
Z:\Shared\UcJobs\_14600-15000\14700\14713\04_Noise\Fieldwork\Measurement\14713_L2_V 84
Date:Location:Meter:Piccolo II JN:14713
Project:Southbridge Fontana Source:Analyst:A. Khan
Timeframe Hour L eq Lmax Lmin L1%L2%L5%L8%L25%L50%L90%L95%L99%Leq Adj.Adj. L eq
0 39.8 43.2 38.0 42.9 42.5 41.7 41.2 40.2 39.4 38.5 38.3 38.1 39.8 10.0 49.8
1 41.4 47.2 38.1 46.6 46.0 45.2 44.7 42.2 39.8 38.6 38.4 38.2 41.4 10.0 51.4
2 48.9 55.8 42.2 55.5 55.1 54.1 53.5 50.1 45.6 42.9 42.6 42.3 48.9 10.0 58.9
3 45.4 48.6 43.7 48.3 48.0 47.3 47.0 45.8 45.1 44.2 44.1 43.9 45.4 10.0 55.4
4 45.7 48.2 44.2 47.9 47.7 47.2 46.9 46.0 45.4 44.7 44.6 44.4 45.7 10.0 55.7
5 48.3 49.9 47.0 49.7 49.6 49.3 49.1 48.6 48.2 47.5 47.4 47.2 48.3 10.0 58.3
6 49.2 54.3 46.5 54.0 53.8 52.7 52.3 49.5 47.9 47.0 46.9 46.7 49.2 10.0 59.2
7 48.2 53.4 45.0 52.8 52.3 51.5 50.9 48.9 47.4 45.7 45.4 45.1 48.2 0.0 48.2
8 47.2 53.9 42.0 53.3 52.7 51.4 50.6 47.9 45.7 43.1 42.7 42.2 47.2 0.0 47.2
9 46.2 53.9 39.8 53.2 52.4 50.6 50.0 47.2 44.6 41.0 40.5 40.0 46.2 0.0 46.2
10 44.4 54.8 38.3 53.6 52.1 49.2 48.0 44.3 42.1 39.2 38.8 38.4 44.4 0.0 44.4
11 44.0 51.9 37.4 51.2 50.5 49.2 48.3 44.7 41.7 38.3 38.0 37.5 44.0 0.0 44.0
12 47.0 56.1 37.1 55.5 55.0 53.8 53.0 46.6 41.7 38.2 37.8 37.3 47.0 0.0 47.0
13 46.8 54.5 38.1 54.0 53.6 52.4 51.6 47.8 43.9 39.7 39.0 38.3 46.8 0.0 46.8
14 45.2 53.2 37.8 52.9 52.6 51.5 50.7 45.3 41.8 38.7 38.4 38.0 45.2 0.0 45.2
15 40.3 45.8 36.5 45.4 44.9 43.8 43.1 41.0 39.3 37.4 37.1 36.7 40.3 0.0 40.3
16 43.8 51.2 37.6 50.5 50.1 49.2 48.2 44.3 41.8 38.8 38.4 37.8 43.8 0.0 43.8
17 44.5 50.7 40.1 50.2 49.7 48.2 47.4 45.2 43.4 41.1 40.7 40.3 44.5 0.0 44.5
18 49.4 56.6 43.2 56.1 55.4 54.5 53.7 50.7 46.5 44.2 43.8 43.4 49.4 0.0 49.4
19 47.6 53.3 43.6 52.9 52.7 52.1 51.5 48.5 45.5 44.3 44.1 43.8 47.6 5.0 52.6
20 46.6 51.0 44.6 50.5 49.9 49.1 48.5 47.0 46.1 45.1 44.9 44.7 46.6 5.0 51.6
21 49.7 56.5 45.3 56.1 55.8 54.4 53.2 50.9 46.9 45.8 45.6 45.4 49.7 5.0 54.7
22 43.9 49.8 40.4 49.3 48.7 47.8 46.9 44.8 42.6 41.0 40.7 40.5 43.9 10.0 53.9
23 41.8 45.3 38.9 45.0 44.8 44.4 44.1 42.7 41.3 39.5 39.3 39.0 41.8 10.0 51.8
Timeframe Hour L eq Lmax Lmin L1%L2%L5%L8%L25%L50%L90%L95%L99%
Min 40.3 45.8 36.5 45.4 44.9 43.8 43.1 41.0 39.3 37.4 37.1 36.7
Max 49.7 56.6 45.3 56.1 55.8 54.5 53.7 50.9 47.4 45.8 45.6 45.4
46.6 52.5 52.0 50.7 49.9 46.7 43.9 41.4 41.0 40.6
Min 39.8 43.2 38.0 42.9 42.5 41.7 41.2 40.2 39.4 38.5 38.3 38.1
Max 49.2 55.8 47.0 55.5 55.1 54.1 53.5 50.1 48.2 47.5 47.4 47.2
46.0 48.8 48.5 47.7 47.3 45.6 43.9 42.7 42.5 42.3
24-Hour Noise Level Measurement Summary
Hourly Leq dBA Readings (unadjusted)
Leq (dBA)
Night
Thursday, February 24, 2022 L3 - Located southeast of the Project site near single-family
residence at 15016 Long View Drive.
Night
Day
Day
Night
Energy Average
Energy Average Average:
Average:
24-Hour Daytime
(7am-10pm)
Nighttime
(10pm-7am)
46.4 46.6 46.0
39
.
8
41
.
4
48
.
9
45
.
4
45
.
7
48
.
3
49
.
2
48
.
2
47
.
2
46
.
2
44
.
4
44
.
0
47
.
0
46
.
8
45
.
2
40
.
3
43
.
8
44
.
5
49
.
4
47
.
6
46
.
6
49
.
7
43
.
9
41
.
8
35.040.045.050.055.060.065.070.075.080.085.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Ho
u
r
l
y
L
eq
(d
B
A
)
Hour Beginning
Z:\Shared\UcJobs\_14600-15000\14700\14713\04_Noise\Fieldwork\Measurement\14713_L3_P 85
Date:Location:Meter:Piccolo II JN:14713
Project:Southbridge Fontana Source:Analyst:A. Khan
Timeframe Hour L eq Lmax Lmin L1%L2%L5%L8%L25%L50%L90%L95%L99%Leq Adj.Adj. L eq
0 45.3 48.9 43.3 48.4 47.9 47.2 46.7 45.4 44.9 44.4 44.0 43.4 45.3 10.0 55.3
1 45.1 56.7 38.5 56.2 55.2 51.3 48.7 43.7 40.6 38.9 38.7 38.6 45.1 10.0 55.1
2 45.0 51.2 41.2 50.7 50.3 49.6 49.0 45.7 42.8 41.5 41.4 41.3 45.0 10.0 55.0
3 44.7 47.6 43.1 47.3 47.0 46.5 46.1 45.1 44.4 43.5 43.4 43.2 44.7 10.0 54.7
4 49.5 56.6 46.5 55.5 54.4 52.9 51.9 50.1 48.6 46.8 46.7 46.5 49.5 10.0 59.5
5 47.3 51.4 45.7 51.1 50.6 49.5 49.0 47.6 46.9 46.0 45.9 45.7 47.3 10.0 57.3
6 52.9 59.2 48.5 58.4 57.7 56.3 55.6 53.8 52.2 49.3 49.0 48.6 52.9 10.0 62.9
7 56.7 63.5 51.7 62.8 62.2 60.5 59.6 57.2 55.5 53.1 52.6 52.1 56.7 0.0 56.7
8 56.2 65.2 46.4 64.0 63.1 61.2 60.1 57.1 54.1 48.5 47.6 46.6 56.2 0.0 56.2
9 63.7 73.6 52.2 73.0 72.0 70.1 68.9 63.7 59.5 54.9 54.0 52.9 63.7 0.0 63.7
10 58.5 73.0 58.3 72.6 72.2 70.7 69.8 67.8 65.6 59.9 59.4 58.6 58.5 0.0 58.5
11 53.9 68.2 48.5 67.6 67.1 66.3 65.8 61.0 56.9 50.8 50.0 49.0 53.9 0.0 53.9
12 49.2 59.3 41.3 58.1 57.2 55.3 54.0 48.9 45.6 42.5 42.1 41.5 49.2 0.0 49.2
13 69.8 71.9 68.9 71.7 71.5 71.3 71.2 70.5 69.9 69.2 69.1 68.9 69.8 0.0 69.8
14 57.7 67.3 50.9 66.0 64.7 62.7 61.9 58.8 54.3 51.4 51.2 51.0 57.7 0.0 57.7
15 48.0 57.2 40.4 56.4 55.6 53.9 52.6 47.9 45.1 41.9 41.4 40.6 48.0 0.0 48.0
16 49.7 59.9 40.3 58.8 57.9 55.8 54.8 49.0 45.6 41.9 41.3 40.6 49.7 0.0 49.7
17 52.6 62.8 42.2 61.6 60.8 59.1 58.0 52.7 47.2 43.7 43.2 42.5 52.6 0.0 52.6
18 47.7 56.2 43.0 55.4 54.7 53.3 52.5 49.8 47.4 44.0 43.6 43.1 47.7 0.0 47.7
19 46.8 52.5 43.3 51.9 51.3 50.1 49.5 47.4 45.9 44.0 43.7 43.4 46.8 5.0 51.8
20 47.8 54.0 44.3 53.3 52.6 51.3 50.5 48.5 47.0 44.9 44.7 44.4 47.8 5.0 52.8
21 49.5 55.4 43.9 55.0 54.8 54.2 53.4 51.1 47.0 44.5 44.3 44.0 49.5 5.0 54.5
22 45.1 51.6 40.6 51.2 50.7 49.2 48.3 45.7 43.8 41.9 41.6 40.8 45.1 10.0 55.1
23 46.5 52.0 44.3 51.3 50.7 49.2 48.7 46.9 45.9 44.7 44.5 44.4 46.5 10.0 56.5
Timeframe Hour L eq Lmax Lmin L1%L2%L5%L8%L25%L50%L90%L95%L99%
Min 46.8 52.5 40.3 51.9 51.3 50.1 49.5 47.4 45.1 41.9 41.3 40.6
Max 69.8 73.6 68.9 73.0 72.2 71.3 71.2 70.5 69.9 69.2 69.1 68.9
60.0 61.9 61.2 59.7 58.8 55.4 52.4 49.0 48.5 48.0
Min 44.7 47.6 38.5 47.3 47.0 46.5 46.1 43.7 40.6 38.9 38.7 38.6
Max 52.9 59.2 48.5 58.4 57.7 56.3 55.6 53.8 52.2 49.3 49.0 48.6
47.8 52.2 51.6 50.2 49.3 47.1 45.6 44.1 43.9 43.6
Day
Night
Energy Average
Energy Average Average:
Average:
24-Hour Daytime
(7am-10pm)
Nighttime
(10pm-7am)
58.1 60.0 47.8
24-Hour Noise Level Measurement Summary
Hourly Leq dBA Readings (unadjusted)
Leq (dBA)
Night
Thursday, February 24, 2022 L4 - Located south of the Project site near single-family
residence at 11804 Aurora Court.
Night
Day
45
.
3
45
.
1
45
.
0
44
.
7
49
.
5
47
.
3
52
.
9 56
.
7
56
.
2
63
.
7
58
.
5
53
.
9
49
.
2
69
.
8
57
.
7
48
.
0
49
.
7
52
.
6
47
.
7
46
.
8
47
.
8
49
.
5
45
.
1
46
.
5
35.040.045.050.055.060.065.070.075.080.085.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Ho
u
r
l
y
L
eq
(d
B
A
)
Hour Beginning
Z:\Shared\UcJobs\_14600-15000\14700\14713\04_Noise\Fieldwork\Measurement\14713_L4_E 86
Date:Location:Meter:Piccolo II JN:14713
Project:Southbridge Fontana Source:Analyst:A. Khan
Timeframe Hour L eq Lmax Lmin L1%L2%L5%L8%L25%L50%L90%L95%L99%Leq Adj.Adj. L eq
0 59.5 71.6 45.1 71.1 70.3 67.4 64.7 56.2 49.6 46.0 45.6 45.2 59.5 10.0 69.5
1 58.6 71.3 47.4 70.8 69.8 66.4 63.4 53.6 49.9 48.0 47.8 47.5 58.6 10.0 68.6
2 59.8 72.4 48.3 71.9 71.0 67.9 64.9 54.7 50.2 48.8 48.6 48.4 59.8 10.0 69.8
3 59.2 71.6 49.3 71.0 70.0 66.8 63.8 55.7 52.0 49.9 49.7 49.4 59.2 10.0 69.2
4 64.1 75.8 50.7 75.1 74.0 71.3 69.5 62.9 55.6 51.4 51.1 50.7 64.1 10.0 74.1
5 67.7 79.4 52.3 78.7 77.7 74.9 72.7 66.6 60.2 53.3 52.7 52.4 67.7 10.0 77.7
6 68.0 78.0 54.8 77.5 76.7 74.8 73.4 68.0 62.3 56.1 55.4 54.9 68.0 10.0 78.0
7 71.4 79.9 59.6 79.4 78.7 76.8 75.5 72.2 69.0 62.3 60.9 59.8 71.4 0.0 71.4
8 68.2 77.3 54.1 76.7 75.9 74.3 73.2 69.3 64.2 55.7 54.8 54.2 68.2 0.0 68.2
9 68.3 79.0 52.5 78.4 77.5 74.7 72.9 68.6 63.4 54.0 53.2 52.7 68.3 0.0 68.3
10 67.7 78.3 50.4 77.6 76.6 74.1 72.8 68.0 62.3 52.7 51.6 50.6 67.7 0.0 67.7
11 68.1 78.1 51.2 77.5 76.6 74.4 73.1 68.8 63.6 54.1 52.9 51.7 68.1 0.0 68.1
12 68.6 78.8 51.4 78.3 77.4 74.8 73.2 69.0 64.3 54.8 52.9 51.6 68.6 0.0 68.6
13 68.2 78.1 49.8 77.6 76.9 74.4 73.0 68.8 63.8 53.8 51.5 50.1 68.2 0.0 68.2
14 68.6 78.1 50.8 77.5 76.5 74.2 73.1 69.6 65.3 55.3 53.0 51.4 68.6 0.0 68.6
15 69.6 77.7 54.9 77.2 76.5 75.0 74.0 70.7 67.5 58.8 57.0 55.1 69.6 0.0 69.6
16 69.7 78.2 54.4 77.7 76.9 75.0 74.1 70.9 67.2 58.1 56.3 54.7 69.7 0.0 69.7
17 70.1 78.6 54.9 78.0 77.3 75.5 74.4 71.2 67.8 59.2 57.1 55.4 70.1 0.0 70.1
18 68.7 78.0 52.5 77.5 76.6 74.7 73.2 69.6 65.6 55.9 54.2 52.7 68.7 0.0 68.7
19 67.5 77.1 49.2 76.5 75.7 73.9 72.7 68.3 63.0 52.9 51.3 49.9 67.5 5.0 72.5
20 66.1 76.6 46.5 76.1 75.1 72.8 71.4 66.5 60.3 49.0 47.4 46.6 66.1 5.0 71.1
21 66.3 78.9 47.0 78.4 77.3 73.5 70.6 64.3 58.5 49.6 48.2 47.1 66.3 5.0 71.3
22 62.5 73.6 46.5 73.1 72.3 70.1 68.1 61.0 54.4 48.3 47.5 46.7 62.5 10.0 72.5
23 58.9 70.8 46.3 70.4 69.5 66.8 64.0 55.9 50.6 47.3 46.8 46.4 58.9 10.0 68.9
Timeframe Hour L eq Lmax Lmin L1%L2%L5%L8%L25%L50%L90%L95%L99%
Min 66.1 76.6 46.5 76.1 75.1 72.8 70.6 64.3 58.5 49.0 47.4 46.6
Max 71.4 79.9 59.6 79.4 78.7 76.8 75.5 72.2 69.0 62.3 60.9 59.8
68.7 77.6 76.8 74.5 73.1 69.1 64.4 55.1 53.5 52.2
Min 58.6 70.8 45.1 70.4 69.5 66.4 63.4 53.6 49.6 46.0 45.6 45.2
Max 68.0 79.4 54.8 78.7 77.7 74.9 73.4 68.0 62.3 56.1 55.4 54.9
63.6 73.3 72.4 69.6 67.2 59.4 53.9 49.9 49.5 49.1
24-Hour Noise Level Measurement Summary
Hourly Leq dBA Readings (unadjusted)
Leq (dBA)
Night
Thursday, February 24, 2022 L5 - Located west of the Project site near single-family
residence at 14799 Goldenrain Drive.
Night
Day
Day
Night
Energy Average
Energy Average Average:
Average:
24-Hour Daytime
(7am-10pm)
Nighttime
(10pm-7am)
67.4 68.7 63.6
59
.
5
58
.
6
59
.
8
59
.
2
64
.
1 67
.
7
68
.
0
71
.
4
68
.
2
68
.
3
67
.
7
68
.
1
68
.
6
68
.
2
68
.
6
69
.
6
69
.
7
70
.
1
68
.
7
67
.
5
66
.
1
66
.
3
62
.
5
58
.
9
35.040.045.050.055.060.065.070.075.080.085.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Ho
u
r
l
y
L
eq
(d
B
A
)
Hour Beginning
Z:\Shared\UcJobs\_14600-15000\14700\14713\04_Noise\Fieldwork\Measurement\14713_L5_U 87
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
This page intentionally left blank
88
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
APPENDIX 7.1:
ON-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE WORKSHEETS
89
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
This page intentionally left blank
90
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Analyst:B. MadduxLot No:1
Road Name:Live Oak Ave
Scenario:Backyard No Wall
14,000
10%
63.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,400 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
63.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.08
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-15.18 -0.06 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-19.13 -0.06 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.00
2.30
8.01
49.820
49.642
49.659
Grade Adjustment:1.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
60.2 58.3 56.6 50.5 59.759.1
54.7
57.9
53.1 46.8 45.2 53.953.7
56.4 47.4 48.6 57.157.0
Vehicle Noise:62.9 61.2 57.4 53.4 62.361.9
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
60.2 58.3 56.6 50.5 59.759.1
54.7
57.9
53.1 46.8 45.2 53.953.7
56.4 47.4 48.6 57.157.0
Vehicle Noise:62.9 61.2 57.4 53.4 62.361.9
71.09
77.24
59.44
Road Grade:2.0%
feet
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
91
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Analyst:B. MadduxLot No:2
Road Name:Live Oak Ave
Scenario:Backyard No Wall
14,000
10%
81.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,400 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
81.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-2.12
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-15.18 -2.11 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-19.13 -2.11 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.72
-4.88
-5.28
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.00
2.30
8.01
68.132
68.002
68.015
Grade Adjustment:1.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
58.2 56.3 54.5 48.5 57.757.1
52.6
55.8
51.1 44.7 43.2 51.951.7
54.4 45.3 46.6 55.154.9
Vehicle Noise:60.9 59.2 55.4 51.4 60.359.9
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
58.2 56.3 54.5 48.5 57.757.1
52.6
55.8
51.1 44.7 43.2 51.951.7
54.4 45.3 46.6 55.154.9
Vehicle Noise:60.9 59.2 55.4 51.4 60.359.9
71.09
77.24
59.44
Road Grade:2.0%
feet
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
92
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Analyst:B. MadduxLot No:3
Road Name:Live Oak Ave
Scenario:Backyard No Wall
14,000
10%
169.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,400 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
169.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-7.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-15.18 -7.54 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-19.13 -7.54 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.81
-4.89
-5.06
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.00
2.30
8.01
156.621
156.564
156.570
Grade Adjustment:1.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
52.8 50.9 49.1 43.0 52.351.7
47.2
50.4
45.7 39.3 37.8 46.546.2
48.9 39.9 41.2 49.649.5
Vehicle Noise:55.4 53.8 50.0 45.9 54.854.4
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
52.8 50.9 49.1 43.0 52.351.7
47.2
50.4
45.7 39.3 37.8 46.546.2
48.9 39.9 41.2 49.649.5
Vehicle Noise:55.4 53.8 50.0 45.9 54.854.4
71.09
77.24
59.44
Road Grade:2.0%
feet
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
93
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Analyst:B. MadduxLot No:9
Road Name:Live Oak Ave
Scenario:Backyard No Wall
14,000
10%
219.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,400 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
219.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-9.35
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-15.18 -9.35 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-19.13 -9.35 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.83
-4.89
-5.02
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.00
2.30
8.01
206.712
206.670
206.674
Grade Adjustment:1.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
51.0 49.1 47.3 41.2 50.549.9
45.4
48.6
43.9 37.5 35.9 44.644.4
47.1 38.1 39.4 47.847.7
Vehicle Noise:53.6 51.9 48.2 44.1 53.052.6
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
51.0 49.1 47.3 41.2 50.549.9
45.4
48.6
43.9 37.5 35.9 44.644.4
47.1 38.1 39.4 47.847.7
Vehicle Noise:53.6 51.9 48.2 44.1 53.052.6
71.09
77.24
59.44
Road Grade:2.0%
feet
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
94
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Analyst:B. MadduxLot No:9
Road Name:Live Oak Ave
Scenario:Backyard No Wall
14,000
10%
230.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,400 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
230.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-9.69
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-15.18 -9.69 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-19.13 -9.69 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.84
-4.89
-5.02
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.00
2.30
8.01
217.727
217.686
217.690
Grade Adjustment:1.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
50.6 48.7 47.0 40.9 50.149.5
45.0
48.2
43.5 37.2 35.6 44.344.1
46.8 37.8 39.0 47.547.4
Vehicle Noise:53.3 51.6 47.8 43.8 52.752.3
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
50.6 48.7 47.0 40.9 50.149.5
45.0
48.2
43.5 37.2 35.6 44.344.1
46.8 37.8 39.0 47.547.4
Vehicle Noise:53.3 51.6 47.8 43.8 52.752.3
71.09
77.24
59.44
Road Grade:2.0%
feet
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
95
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Analyst:B. MadduxLot No:1
Road Name:Live Oak Ave
Scenario:Backyard With Wall
14,000
10%
63.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,400 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
63.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.08
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-15.18 -0.06 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-19.13 -0.06 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.00
2.30
8.01
49.820
49.642
49.659
Grade Adjustment:1.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
60.2 58.3 56.6 50.5 59.759.1
54.7
57.9
53.1 46.8 45.2 53.953.7
56.4 47.4 48.6 57.157.0
Vehicle Noise:62.9 61.2 57.4 53.4 62.361.9
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
60.2 58.3 56.6 50.5 59.759.1
54.7
57.9
53.1 46.8 45.2 53.953.7
56.4 47.4 48.6 57.157.0
Vehicle Noise:62.9 61.2 57.4 53.4 62.361.9
71.09
77.24
59.44
Road Grade:2.0%
feet
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
96
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Analyst:B. MadduxLot No:2
Road Name:Live Oak Ave
Scenario:Backyard With Wall
14,000
10%
81.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,400 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
81.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-2.12
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-15.18 -2.11 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-19.13 -2.11 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.72
-4.88
-5.28
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.00
2.30
8.01
68.132
68.002
68.015
Grade Adjustment:1.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
58.2 56.3 54.5 48.5 57.757.1
52.6
55.8
51.1 44.7 43.2 51.951.7
54.4 45.3 46.6 55.154.9
Vehicle Noise:60.9 59.2 55.4 51.4 60.359.9
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
58.2 56.3 54.5 48.5 57.757.1
52.6
55.8
51.1 44.7 43.2 51.951.7
54.4 45.3 46.6 55.154.9
Vehicle Noise:60.9 59.2 55.4 51.4 60.359.9
71.09
77.24
59.44
Road Grade:2.0%
feet
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
97
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Analyst:B. MadduxLot No:3
Road Name:Live Oak Ave
Scenario:Backyard With Wall
14,000
10%
169.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,400 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
169.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-7.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-15.18 -7.54 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-19.13 -7.54 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.81
-4.89
-5.06
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.00
2.30
8.01
156.621
156.564
156.570
Grade Adjustment:1.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
52.8 50.9 49.1 43.0 52.351.7
47.2
50.4
45.7 39.3 37.8 46.546.2
48.9 39.9 41.2 49.649.5
Vehicle Noise:55.4 53.8 50.0 45.9 54.854.4
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
52.8 50.9 49.1 43.0 52.351.7
47.2
50.4
45.7 39.3 37.8 46.546.2
48.9 39.9 41.2 49.649.5
Vehicle Noise:55.4 53.8 50.0 45.9 54.854.4
71.09
77.24
59.44
Road Grade:2.0%
feet
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
98
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Analyst:B. MadduxLot No:9
Road Name:Live Oak Ave
Scenario:Backyard With Wall
14,000
10%
219.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,400 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
219.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-9.35
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-15.18 -9.35 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-19.13 -9.35 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.83
-4.89
-5.02
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.00
2.30
8.01
206.712
206.670
206.674
Grade Adjustment:1.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
51.0 49.1 47.3 41.2 50.549.9
45.4
48.6
43.9 37.5 35.9 44.644.4
47.1 38.1 39.4 47.847.7
Vehicle Noise:53.6 51.9 48.2 44.1 53.052.6
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
51.0 49.1 47.3 41.2 50.549.9
45.4
48.6
43.9 37.5 35.9 44.644.4
47.1 38.1 39.4 47.847.7
Vehicle Noise:53.6 51.9 48.2 44.1 53.052.6
71.09
77.24
59.44
Road Grade:2.0%
feet
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
99
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Analyst:B. MadduxLot No:9
Road Name:Live Oak Ave
Scenario:Backyard With Wall
14,000
10%
230.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,400 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
230.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-9.69
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-15.18 -9.69 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-19.13 -9.69 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.84
-4.89
-5.02
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.00
2.30
8.01
217.727
217.686
217.690
Grade Adjustment:1.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
50.6 48.7 47.0 40.9 50.149.5
45.0
48.2
43.5 37.2 35.6 44.344.1
46.8 37.8 39.0 47.547.4
Vehicle Noise:53.3 51.6 47.8 43.8 52.752.3
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
50.6 48.7 47.0 40.9 50.149.5
45.0
48.2
43.5 37.2 35.6 44.344.1
46.8 37.8 39.0 47.547.4
Vehicle Noise:53.3 51.6 47.8 43.8 52.752.3
71.09
77.24
59.44
Road Grade:2.0%
feet
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
100
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Analyst:B. MadduxLot No:1
Road Name:Live Oak Ave
Scenario:First Floor With Wall
14,000
10%
63.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,400 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
63.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.08
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-15.18 -0.06 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-19.13 -0.06 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.00
2.30
8.01
49.820
49.642
49.659
Grade Adjustment:1.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
60.2 58.3 56.6 50.5 59.759.1
54.7
57.9
53.1 46.8 45.2 53.953.7
56.4 47.4 48.6 57.157.0
Vehicle Noise:62.9 61.2 57.4 53.4 62.361.9
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
60.2 58.3 56.6 50.5 59.759.1
54.7
57.9
53.1 46.8 45.2 53.953.7
56.4 47.4 48.6 57.157.0
Vehicle Noise:62.9 61.2 57.4 53.4 62.361.9
71.09
77.24
59.44
Road Grade:2.0%
feet
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
101
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Analyst:B. MadduxLot No:2
Road Name:Live Oak Ave
Scenario:First Floor With Wall
14,000
10%
81.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,400 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
81.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-2.12
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-15.18 -2.11 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-19.13 -2.11 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.72
-4.88
-5.28
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.00
2.30
8.01
68.132
68.002
68.015
Grade Adjustment:1.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
58.2 56.3 54.5 48.5 57.757.1
52.6
55.8
51.1 44.7 43.2 51.951.7
54.4 45.3 46.6 55.154.9
Vehicle Noise:60.9 59.2 55.4 51.4 60.359.9
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
58.2 56.3 54.5 48.5 57.757.1
52.6
55.8
51.1 44.7 43.2 51.951.7
54.4 45.3 46.6 55.154.9
Vehicle Noise:60.9 59.2 55.4 51.4 60.359.9
71.09
77.24
59.44
Road Grade:2.0%
feet
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
102
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Analyst:B. MadduxLot No:3
Road Name:Live Oak Ave
Scenario:First Floor With Wall
14,000
10%
169.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,400 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
169.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-7.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-15.18 -7.54 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-19.13 -7.54 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.81
-4.89
-5.06
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.00
2.30
8.01
156.621
156.564
156.570
Grade Adjustment:1.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
52.8 50.9 49.1 43.0 52.351.7
47.2
50.4
45.7 39.3 37.8 46.546.2
48.9 39.9 41.2 49.649.5
Vehicle Noise:55.4 53.8 50.0 45.9 54.854.4
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
52.8 50.9 49.1 43.0 52.351.7
47.2
50.4
45.7 39.3 37.8 46.546.2
48.9 39.9 41.2 49.649.5
Vehicle Noise:55.4 53.8 50.0 45.9 54.854.4
71.09
77.24
59.44
Road Grade:2.0%
feet
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
103
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Analyst:B. MadduxLot No:9
Road Name:Live Oak Ave
Scenario:First Floor With Wall
14,000
10%
219.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,400 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
219.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-9.35
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-15.18 -9.35 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-19.13 -9.35 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.83
-4.89
-5.02
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.00
2.30
8.01
206.712
206.670
206.674
Grade Adjustment:1.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
51.0 49.1 47.3 41.2 50.549.9
45.4
48.6
43.9 37.5 35.9 44.644.4
47.1 38.1 39.4 47.847.7
Vehicle Noise:53.6 51.9 48.2 44.1 53.052.6
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
51.0 49.1 47.3 41.2 50.549.9
45.4
48.6
43.9 37.5 35.9 44.644.4
47.1 38.1 39.4 47.847.7
Vehicle Noise:53.6 51.9 48.2 44.1 53.052.6
71.09
77.24
59.44
Road Grade:2.0%
feet
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
104
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Analyst:B. MadduxLot No:9
Road Name:Live Oak Ave
Scenario:First Floor With Wall
14,000
10%
230.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,400 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
230.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-9.69
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-15.18 -9.69 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-19.13 -9.69 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.84
-4.89
-5.02
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.00
2.30
8.01
217.727
217.686
217.690
Grade Adjustment:1.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
50.6 48.7 47.0 40.9 50.149.5
45.0
48.2
43.5 37.2 35.6 44.344.1
46.8 37.8 39.0 47.547.4
Vehicle Noise:53.3 51.6 47.8 43.8 52.752.3
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
50.6 48.7 47.0 40.9 50.149.5
45.0
48.2
43.5 37.2 35.6 44.344.1
46.8 37.8 39.0 47.547.4
Vehicle Noise:53.3 51.6 47.8 43.8 52.752.3
71.09
77.24
59.44
Road Grade:2.0%
feet
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
105
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Analyst:B. MadduxLot No:1
Road Name:Live Oak Ave
Scenario:Second Floor With Wall
14,000
10%
63.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,400 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
63.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):14.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.30
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-15.18 -0.22 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-19.13 -0.09 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-11.85
-12.45
-13.97
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.00
2.30
8.01
51.507
50.931
49.929
Grade Adjustment:1.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
60.0 58.1 56.3 50.3 59.558.9
54.5
57.8
53.0 46.6 45.1 53.853.5
56.4 47.4 48.6 57.157.0
Vehicle Noise:62.8 61.1 57.3 53.3 62.261.8
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
60.0 58.1 56.3 50.3 59.558.9
54.5
57.8
53.0 46.6 45.1 53.853.5
56.4 47.4 48.6 57.157.0
Vehicle Noise:62.8 61.1 57.3 53.3 62.261.8
71.09
77.24
59.44
Road Grade:2.0%
feet
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
106
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Analyst:B. MadduxLot No:2
Road Name:Live Oak Ave
Scenario:Second Floor With Wall
14,000
10%
81.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,400 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
81.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):14.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-2.24
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-15.18 -2.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-19.13 -2.13 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-12.32
-12.77
-13.90
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.00
2.30
8.01
69.376
68.949
68.212
Grade Adjustment:1.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
58.1 56.2 54.4 48.3 57.657.0
52.5
55.8
51.0 44.6 43.1 51.851.6
54.4 45.3 46.6 55.154.9
Vehicle Noise:60.8 59.1 55.3 51.3 60.259.8
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
58.1 56.2 54.4 48.3 57.657.0
52.5
55.8
51.0 44.6 43.1 51.851.6
54.4 45.3 46.6 55.154.9
Vehicle Noise:60.8 59.1 55.3 51.3 60.259.8
71.09
77.24
59.44
Road Grade:2.0%
feet
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
107
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Analyst:B. MadduxLot No:3
Road Name:Live Oak Ave
Scenario:Second Floor With Wall
14,000
10%
169.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,400 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
169.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):14.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-7.56
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-15.18 -7.56 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-19.13 -7.54 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-13.09
-13.29
-13.79
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.00
2.30
8.01
157.166
156.978
156.655
Grade Adjustment:1.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
52.7 50.8 49.1 43.0 52.251.6
47.2
50.4
45.6 39.3 37.7 46.446.2
48.9 39.9 41.2 49.649.5
Vehicle Noise:55.4 53.7 50.0 45.9 54.854.4
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
52.7 50.8 49.1 43.0 52.251.6
47.2
50.4
45.6 39.3 37.7 46.446.2
48.9 39.9 41.2 49.649.5
Vehicle Noise:55.4 53.7 50.0 45.9 54.854.4
71.09
77.24
59.44
Road Grade:2.0%
feet
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
108
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Analyst:B. MadduxLot No:9
Road Name:Live Oak Ave
Scenario:Second Floor With Wall
14,000
10%
219.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,400 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
219.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):14.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-9.36
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-15.18 -9.36 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-19.13 -9.35 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-13.24
-13.39
-13.76
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.00
2.30
8.01
207.126
206.983
206.739
Grade Adjustment:1.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
50.9 49.0 47.3 41.2 50.449.8
45.4
48.6
43.8 37.5 35.9 44.644.4
47.1 38.1 39.4 47.847.7
Vehicle Noise:53.6 51.9 48.2 44.1 53.052.6
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
50.9 49.0 47.3 41.2 50.449.8
45.4
48.6
43.8 37.5 35.9 44.644.4
47.1 38.1 39.4 47.847.7
Vehicle Noise:53.6 51.9 48.2 44.1 53.052.6
71.09
77.24
59.44
Road Grade:2.0%
feet
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
109
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Analyst:B. MadduxLot No:9
Road Name:Live Oak Ave
Scenario:Second Floor With Wall
14,000
10%
230.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,400 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
230.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):14.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-9.70
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-15.18 -9.70 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-19.13 -9.69 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-13.26
-13.40
-13.76
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.00
2.30
8.01
218.119
217.984
217.752
Grade Adjustment:1.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
50.6 48.7 46.9 40.9 50.149.5
45.0
48.2
43.5 37.1 35.6 44.344.1
46.8 37.8 39.0 47.547.4
Vehicle Noise:53.3 51.6 47.8 43.8 52.752.3
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
50.6 48.7 46.9 40.9 50.149.5
45.0
48.2
43.5 37.1 35.6 44.344.1
46.8 37.8 39.0 47.547.4
Vehicle Noise:53.3 51.6 47.8 43.8 52.752.3
71.09
77.24
59.44
Road Grade:2.0%
feet
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
110
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Analyst:B. MadduxLot No:1
Road Name:Live Oak Ave
Scenario:Third Floor With Wall
14,000
10%
63.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,400 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
63.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):23.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.68
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-15.18 -0.57 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-19.13 -0.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-17.66
-18.60
-21.00
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.00
2.30
8.01
54.644
53.718
51.786
Grade Adjustment:1.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
59.6 57.7 56.0 49.9 59.158.5
54.1
57.6
52.6 46.3 44.7 53.453.2
56.2 47.1 48.4 56.956.7
Vehicle Noise:62.4 60.7 56.9 52.9 61.861.4
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
59.6 57.7 56.0 49.9 59.158.5
54.1
57.6
52.6 46.3 44.7 53.453.2
56.2 47.1 48.4 56.956.7
Vehicle Noise:62.4 60.7 56.9 52.9 61.861.4
71.09
77.24
59.44
Road Grade:2.0%
feet
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
111
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Analyst:B. MadduxLot No:2
Road Name:Live Oak Ave
Scenario:Third Floor With Wall
14,000
10%
81.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,400 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
81.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):23.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-2.45
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-15.18 -2.39 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-19.13 -2.26 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-18.85
-19.57
-21.38
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.00
2.30
8.01
71.736
71.032
69.583
Grade Adjustment:1.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
57.8 55.9 54.2 48.1 57.456.8
52.3
55.7
50.8 44.5 42.9 51.651.4
54.2 45.2 46.4 54.954.8
Vehicle Noise:60.6 58.9 55.1 51.1 60.059.6
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
57.8 55.9 54.2 48.1 57.456.8
52.3
55.7
50.8 44.5 42.9 51.651.4
54.2 45.2 46.4 54.954.8
Vehicle Noise:60.6 58.9 55.1 51.1 60.059.6
71.09
77.24
59.44
Road Grade:2.0%
feet
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
112
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Analyst:B. MadduxLot No:3
Road Name:Live Oak Ave
Scenario:Third Floor With Wall
14,000
10%
169.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,400 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
169.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):23.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-7.61
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-15.18 -7.59 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-19.13 -7.57 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-20.86
-21.19
-22.00
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.00
2.30
8.01
158.221
157.904
157.257
Grade Adjustment:1.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
52.7 50.8 49.0 43.0 52.251.6
47.1
50.3
45.6 39.2 37.7 46.446.2
48.9 39.9 41.1 49.649.5
Vehicle Noise:55.4 53.7 49.9 45.9 54.854.4
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
52.7 50.8 49.0 43.0 52.251.6
47.1
50.3
45.6 39.2 37.7 46.446.2
48.9 39.9 41.1 49.649.5
Vehicle Noise:55.4 53.7 49.9 45.9 54.854.4
71.09
77.24
59.44
Road Grade:2.0%
feet
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
113
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Analyst:B. MadduxLot No:9
Road Name:Live Oak Ave
Scenario:Third Floor With Wall
14,000
10%
219.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,400 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
219.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):23.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-9.39
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-15.18 -9.38 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-19.13 -9.36 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-21.26
-21.51
-22.12
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.00
2.30
8.01
207.928
207.686
207.195
Grade Adjustment:1.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
50.9 49.0 47.3 41.2 50.449.8
45.3
48.5
43.8 37.5 35.9 44.644.4
47.1 38.1 39.3 47.847.7
Vehicle Noise:53.6 51.9 48.1 44.1 53.052.6
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
50.9 49.0 47.3 41.2 50.449.8
45.3
48.5
43.8 37.5 35.9 44.644.4
47.1 38.1 39.3 47.847.7
Vehicle Noise:53.6 51.9 48.1 44.1 53.052.6
71.09
77.24
59.44
Road Grade:2.0%
feet
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
114
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Analyst:B. MadduxLot No:9
Road Name:Live Oak Ave
Scenario:Third Floor With Wall
14,000
10%
230.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,400 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
230.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):23.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-9.72
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-15.18 -9.72 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-19.13 -9.70 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-21.32
-21.56
-22.14
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.00
2.30
8.01
218.881
218.652
218.185
Grade Adjustment:1.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
50.6 48.7 46.9 40.9 50.149.5
45.0
48.2
43.5 37.1 35.6 44.344.0
46.8 37.8 39.0 47.547.4
Vehicle Noise:53.3 51.6 47.8 43.8 52.752.3
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
50.6 48.7 46.9 40.9 50.149.5
45.0
48.2
43.5 37.1 35.6 44.344.0
46.8 37.8 39.0 47.547.4
Vehicle Noise:53.3 51.6 47.8 43.8 52.752.3
71.09
77.24
59.44
Road Grade:2.0%
feet
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
115
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Analyst:B. MadduxLot No:1
Road Name:Live Oak Ave
Scenario:Fourth Floor With Wall
14,000
10%
63.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,400 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
63.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):32.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-15.18 -1.05 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-19.13 -0.73 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-22.30
-23.51
-26.67
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.00
2.30
8.01
59.000
57.786
55.070
Grade Adjustment:1.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
59.1 57.2 55.5 49.4 58.658.0
53.7
57.2
52.2 45.8 44.3 52.952.7
55.8 46.7 48.0 56.556.3
Vehicle Noise:62.0 60.3 56.4 52.5 61.461.0
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
59.1 57.2 55.5 49.4 58.658.0
53.7
57.2
52.2 45.8 44.3 52.952.7
55.8 46.7 48.0 56.556.3
Vehicle Noise:62.0 60.3 56.4 52.5 61.461.0
71.09
77.24
59.44
Road Grade:2.0%
feet
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
116
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Analyst:B. MadduxLot No:2
Road Name:Live Oak Ave
Scenario:Fourth Floor With Wall
14,000
10%
81.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,400 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
81.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):32.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-2.75
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-15.18 -2.67 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-19.13 -2.48 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-24.40
-25.36
-27.80
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.00
2.30
8.01
75.107
74.157
72.060
Grade Adjustment:1.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
57.5 55.7 53.9 47.8 57.156.5
52.0
55.4
50.5 44.2 42.6 51.351.1
54.0 45.0 46.2 54.754.6
Vehicle Noise:60.3 58.6 54.8 50.8 59.759.3
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
57.5 55.7 53.9 47.8 57.156.5
52.0
55.4
50.5 44.2 42.6 51.351.1
54.0 45.0 46.2 54.754.6
Vehicle Noise:60.3 58.6 54.8 50.8 59.759.3
71.09
77.24
59.44
Road Grade:2.0%
feet
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
117
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Analyst:B. MadduxLot No:3
Road Name:Live Oak Ave
Scenario:Fourth Floor With Wall
14,000
10%
169.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,400 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
169.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):32.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-7.67
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-15.18 -7.65 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-19.13 -7.61 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-28.15
-28.60
-29.73
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.00
2.30
8.01
159.778
159.334
158.369
Grade Adjustment:1.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
52.6 50.7 49.0 42.9 52.151.5
47.1
50.3
45.6 39.2 37.6 46.346.1
48.9 39.8 41.1 49.649.4
Vehicle Noise:55.3 53.6 49.9 45.8 54.754.3
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
52.6 50.7 49.0 42.9 52.151.5
47.1
50.3
45.6 39.2 37.6 46.346.1
48.9 39.8 41.1 49.649.4
Vehicle Noise:55.3 53.6 49.9 45.8 54.754.3
71.09
77.24
59.44
Road Grade:2.0%
feet
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
118
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Analyst:B. MadduxLot No:9
Road Name:Live Oak Ave
Scenario:Fourth Floor With Wall
14,000
10%
219.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,400 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
219.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):32.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-9.42
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-15.18 -9.41 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-19.13 -9.39 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-28.90
-29.25
-30.10
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.00
2.30
8.01
209.115
208.776
208.040
Grade Adjustment:1.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
50.9 49.0 47.2 41.2 50.449.8
45.3
48.5
43.8 37.4 35.9 44.644.3
47.1 38.1 39.3 47.847.7
Vehicle Noise:53.6 51.9 48.1 44.1 53.052.6
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
50.9 49.0 47.2 41.2 50.449.8
45.3
48.5
43.8 37.4 35.9 44.644.3
47.1 38.1 39.3 47.847.7
Vehicle Noise:53.6 51.9 48.1 44.1 53.052.6
71.09
77.24
59.44
Road Grade:2.0%
feet
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
119
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - v10/31/19
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Analyst:B. MadduxLot No:9
Road Name:Live Oak Ave
Scenario:Fourth Floor With Wall
14,000
10%
230.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,400 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
230.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):32.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-9.76
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-15.18 -9.75 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-19.13 -9.73 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-29.02
-29.35
-30.16
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.00
2.30
8.01
220.009
219.687
218.988
Grade Adjustment:1.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
50.5 48.6 46.9 40.8 50.149.4
45.0
48.2
43.5 37.1 35.6 44.244.0
46.8 37.7 39.0 47.547.3
Vehicle Noise:53.2 51.5 47.8 43.7 52.652.2
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
50.5 48.6 46.9 40.8 50.149.4
45.0
48.2
43.5 37.1 35.6 44.244.0
46.8 37.7 39.0 47.547.3
Vehicle Noise:53.2 51.5 47.8 43.7 52.652.2
71.09
77.24
59.44
Road Grade:2.0%
feet
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
120
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
APPENDIX 8.1:
OFF-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE WORKSHEETS
121
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
This page intentionally left blank
122
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:w/o Cherry Ave
Road Name:Live Oaks Ave
Scenario:Existing
3,077
8.25%
30.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:254 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
30.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-5.35
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
3.69
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
70.80 -22.59 3.76 -1.20 0.000 0.000
77.97 -26.55 3.75 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.49
-4.86
-5.77
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
58.73
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
27.946
27.628
27.659
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
55.9 54.8 53.0 47.0 56.255.6
50.8
54.0
50.1 43.7 42.2 50.950.6
53.4 44.4 45.6 54.154.0
Vehicle Noise:58.8 57.9 54.0 50.1 59.058.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
5 11 5224
6 12 5626
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
123
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:e/o Cherry Ave
Road Name:Live Oaks Ave
Scenario:Existing
8,590
8.25%
30.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:709 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
30.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.36
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
3.69
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -19.59 3.76 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -23.55 3.75 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.49
-4.86
-5.77
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
27.946
27.628
27.659
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.4 63.4 61.6 55.5 64.864.2
58.7
60.6
58.0 51.7 50.1 58.858.6
60.0 50.9 52.2 60.760.6
Vehicle Noise:66.7 65.8 62.4 58.0 66.966.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
18 38 17581
19 40 18787
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
124
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:n/o Driveway 1
Road Name:Live Oaks Ave
Scenario:Existing
8,697
8.25%
30.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:718 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
30.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.30
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
3.69
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -19.54 3.76 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -23.50 3.75 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.49
-4.86
-5.77
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
27.946
27.628
27.659
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.5 63.4 61.7 55.6 64.864.2
58.8
60.6
58.1 51.7 50.2 58.958.7
60.0 51.0 52.3 60.760.6
Vehicle Noise:66.7 65.9 62.4 58.0 67.066.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
18 38 17782
19 41 18988
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
125
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:n/o Goldenrain Dr
Road Name:Live Oaks Ave
Scenario:Existing
8,270
8.25%
30.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:682 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
30.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.52
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
3.69
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -19.76 3.76 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -23.71 3.75 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.49
-4.86
-5.77
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
27.946
27.628
27.659
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.3 63.2 61.4 55.4 64.664.0
58.6
60.4
57.9 51.5 50.0 58.758.4
59.8 50.8 52.0 60.560.4
Vehicle Noise:66.5 65.6 62.2 57.8 66.866.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
17 37 17179
18 39 18385
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
126
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:n/o Jurupa Ave
Road Name:Live Oaks Ave
Scenario:Existing
2,137
8.25%
40.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:176 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
40.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:36 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-8.40
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
2.02
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -25.64 2.07 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -29.59 2.06 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.59
-4.87
-5.56
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
36.069
35.823
35.847
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
56.7 55.7 53.9 47.8 57.156.5
51.0
52.8
50.3 43.9 42.4 51.150.9
52.3 43.2 44.5 52.952.8
Vehicle Noise:59.0 58.1 54.6 50.3 59.258.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
7 15 7233
8 16 7635
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
127
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:n/o Jurupa Ave
Road Name:Cherry Ave
Scenario:Existing
14,509
8.25%
52.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,197 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
52.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:50 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.08
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.46
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -17.32 0.49 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -21.27 0.48 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.66
-4.87
-5.41
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
45.869
45.676
45.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
63.5 62.4 60.7 54.6 63.863.2
57.7
59.6
57.0 50.7 49.1 57.857.6
59.0 50.0 51.2 59.759.6
Vehicle Noise:65.7 64.8 61.4 57.0 66.065.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
26 56 262122
28 60 280130
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
128
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:s/o Jurupa Ave
Road Name:Cherry Ave
Scenario:Existing
10,364
8.25%
52.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:855 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
52.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:50 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.54
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.46
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -18.78 0.49 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -22.73 0.48 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.66
-4.87
-5.41
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
45.869
45.676
45.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
62.0 61.0 59.2 53.1 62.461.8
56.3
58.1
55.6 49.2 47.7 56.456.1
57.5 48.5 49.7 58.258.1
Vehicle Noise:64.3 63.4 59.9 55.5 64.564.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
21 45 20997
22 48 224104
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
129
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:s/o Live Oaks Ave
Road Name:Cherry Ave
Scenario:Existing
12,885
8.25%
52.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,063 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
52.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:50 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.59
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.46
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -17.83 0.49 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -21.79 0.48 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.66
-4.87
-5.41
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
45.869
45.676
45.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
63.0 61.9 60.1 54.1 63.362.7
57.2
59.1
56.5 50.2 48.6 57.357.1
58.5 49.4 50.7 59.259.0
Vehicle Noise:65.2 64.3 60.9 56.5 65.565.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
24 52 242112
26 56 259120
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
130
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:w/o Cherry Ave
Road Name:Jurupa Ave
Scenario:Existing
21,508
8.25%
66.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,774 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
66.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:80 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
0.54
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.45
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -16.70 -0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -20.65 -0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.71
-4.88
-5.30
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
52.735
52.567
52.584
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.3 66.3 64.5 58.5 67.767.1
61.1
62.0
60.4 54.1 52.5 61.261.0
61.4 52.3 53.6 62.161.9
Vehicle Noise:69.2 68.3 65.1 60.5 69.569.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
57 122 566263
61 131 607282
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
131
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:e/o Cherry Ave
Road Name:Jurupa Ave
Scenario:Existing
16,497
8.25%
66.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,361 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
66.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:80 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.61
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.45
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -17.85 -0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -21.81 -0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.71
-4.88
-5.30
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
52.735
52.567
52.584
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.2 65.1 63.4 57.3 66.565.9
60.0
60.8
59.3 52.9 51.4 60.159.9
60.2 51.2 52.4 60.960.8
Vehicle Noise:68.0 67.1 64.0 59.3 68.367.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
47 102 474220
51 110 509236
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
132
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:e/o Live Oaks Ave
Road Name:Jurupa Ave
Scenario:Existing
24,072
8.25%
66.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,986 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
66.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:80 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
1.03
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.45
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -16.21 -0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -20.17 -0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.71
-4.88
-5.30
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
52.735
52.567
52.584
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.8 66.8 65.0 59.0 68.267.6
61.6
62.5
60.9 54.6 53.0 61.761.5
61.9 52.8 54.1 62.662.4
Vehicle Noise:69.7 68.8 65.6 60.9 69.969.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
61 131 610283
65 141 654304
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
133
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:w/o Cherry Ave
Road Name:Live Oaks Ave
Scenario:E + Project
3,077
8.25%
30.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:254 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
30.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-5.35
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
3.69
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
70.80 -22.59 3.76 -1.20 0.000 0.000
77.97 -26.55 3.75 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.49
-4.86
-5.77
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
58.73
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
27.946
27.628
27.659
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
55.9 54.8 53.0 47.0 56.255.6
50.8
54.0
50.1 43.7 42.2 50.950.6
53.4 44.4 45.6 54.154.0
Vehicle Noise:58.8 57.9 54.0 50.1 59.058.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
5 11 5224
6 12 5626
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
134
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:e/o Cherry Ave
Road Name:Live Oaks Ave
Scenario:E + Project
10,058
8.25%
30.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:830 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
30.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.67
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
3.69
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -18.91 3.76 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -22.86 3.75 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.49
-4.86
-5.77
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
27.946
27.628
27.659
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.1 64.1 62.3 56.2 65.564.9
59.4
61.3
58.7 52.4 50.8 59.559.3
60.7 51.6 52.9 61.461.2
Vehicle Noise:67.4 66.5 63.0 58.7 67.667.2
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
19 42 19590
21 45 20897
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
135
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:n/o Driveway 1
Road Name:Live Oaks Ave
Scenario:E + Project
10,167
8.25%
30.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:839 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
30.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.62
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
3.69
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -18.86 3.76 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -22.82 3.75 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.49
-4.86
-5.77
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
27.946
27.628
27.659
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.2 64.1 62.3 56.3 65.564.9
59.4
61.3
58.8 52.4 50.9 59.659.3
60.7 51.7 52.9 61.461.3
Vehicle Noise:67.4 66.5 63.1 58.7 67.767.2
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
20 42 19691
21 45 21097
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
136
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:n/o Goldenrain Dr
Road Name:Live Oaks Ave
Scenario:E + Project
8,638
8.25%
30.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:713 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
30.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.33
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
3.69
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -19.57 3.76 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -23.53 3.75 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.49
-4.86
-5.77
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
27.946
27.628
27.659
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.5 63.4 61.6 55.6 64.864.2
58.7
60.6
58.1 51.7 50.2 58.958.6
60.0 51.0 52.2 60.760.6
Vehicle Noise:66.7 65.8 62.4 58.0 67.066.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
18 38 17682
19 41 18887
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
137
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:n/o Jurupa Ave
Road Name:Live Oaks Ave
Scenario:E + Project
2,229
8.25%
40.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:184 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
40.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:36 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-8.21
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
2.02
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -25.45 2.07 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -29.41 2.06 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.59
-4.87
-5.56
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
36.069
35.823
35.847
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
56.9 55.8 54.1 48.0 57.356.7
51.2
53.0
50.5 44.1 42.6 51.351.0
52.4 43.4 44.7 53.153.0
Vehicle Noise:59.2 58.3 54.8 50.4 59.459.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
7 16 7434
8 17 7936
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
138
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:n/o Jurupa Ave
Road Name:Cherry Ave
Scenario:E + Project
14,969
8.25%
52.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,235 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
52.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:50 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
0.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.46
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -17.18 0.49 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -21.14 0.48 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.66
-4.87
-5.41
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
45.869
45.676
45.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
63.6 62.6 60.8 54.7 64.063.4
57.9
59.7
57.2 50.8 49.3 58.057.7
59.1 50.1 51.3 59.859.7
Vehicle Noise:65.9 65.0 61.5 57.1 66.165.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
27 58 268124
29 62 286133
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
139
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:s/o Jurupa Ave
Road Name:Cherry Ave
Scenario:E + Project
11,284
8.25%
52.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:931 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
52.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:50 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.17
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.46
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -18.41 0.49 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -22.36 0.48 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.66
-4.87
-5.41
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
45.869
45.676
45.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
62.4 61.3 59.6 53.5 62.762.1
56.6
58.5
56.0 49.6 48.0 56.756.5
57.9 48.9 50.1 58.658.5
Vehicle Noise:64.6 63.7 60.3 55.9 64.964.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
22 48 222103
24 51 237110
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
140
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:s/o Live Oaks Ave
Road Name:Cherry Ave
Scenario:E + Project
13,435
8.25%
52.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,108 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
52.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:50 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.41
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.46
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -17.65 0.49 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -21.61 0.48 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.66
-4.87
-5.41
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
45.869
45.676
45.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
63.1 62.1 60.3 54.3 63.562.9
57.4
59.2
56.7 50.4 48.8 57.557.3
58.7 49.6 50.9 59.459.2
Vehicle Noise:65.4 64.5 61.1 56.7 65.665.2
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
25 54 249116
27 57 266123
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
141
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:w/o Cherry Ave
Road Name:Jurupa Ave
Scenario:E + Project
21,968
8.25%
66.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,812 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
66.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:80 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
0.63
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.45
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -16.61 -0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -20.56 -0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.71
-4.88
-5.30
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
52.735
52.567
52.584
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.4 66.4 64.6 58.6 67.867.2
61.2
62.1
60.5 54.2 52.6 61.361.1
61.5 52.4 53.7 62.262.0
Vehicle Noise:69.3 68.4 65.2 60.5 69.569.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
57 124 574266
62 133 616286
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
142
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:e/o Cherry Ave
Road Name:Jurupa Ave
Scenario:E + Project
16,497
8.25%
66.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,361 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
66.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:80 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.61
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.45
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -17.85 -0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -21.81 -0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.71
-4.88
-5.30
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
52.735
52.567
52.584
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.2 65.1 63.4 57.3 66.565.9
60.0
60.8
59.3 52.9 51.4 60.159.9
60.2 51.2 52.4 60.960.8
Vehicle Noise:68.0 67.1 64.0 59.3 68.367.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
47 102 474220
51 110 509236
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
143
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:e/o Live Oaks Ave
Road Name:Jurupa Ave
Scenario:E + Project
24,348
8.25%
66.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,009 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
66.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:80 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
1.08
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.45
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -16.16 -0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -20.12 -0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.71
-4.88
-5.30
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
52.735
52.567
52.584
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.9 66.8 65.1 59.0 68.267.6
61.7
62.5
61.0 54.6 53.1 61.861.5
61.9 52.9 54.1 62.662.5
Vehicle Noise:69.7 68.8 65.7 61.0 70.069.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
61 132 615285
66 142 659306
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
144
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:w/o Cherry Ave
Road Name:Live Oaks Ave
Scenario:EA
3,397
8.25%
30.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:280 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
30.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-4.92
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
3.69
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
70.80 -22.16 3.76 -1.20 0.000 0.000
77.97 -26.12 3.75 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.49
-4.86
-5.77
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
58.73
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
27.946
27.628
27.659
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
56.3 55.2 53.5 47.4 56.656.0
51.2
54.4
50.5 44.2 42.6 51.351.1
53.8 44.8 46.0 54.554.4
Vehicle Noise:59.2 58.4 54.4 50.6 59.459.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
6 12 5626
6 13 5928
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
145
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:e/o Cherry Ave
Road Name:Live Oaks Ave
Scenario:EA
10,952
8.25%
30.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:904 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
30.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.30
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
3.69
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -18.54 3.76 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -22.49 3.75 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.49
-4.86
-5.77
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
27.946
27.628
27.659
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.5 64.4 62.7 56.6 65.865.2
59.8
61.6
59.1 52.7 51.2 59.959.7
61.0 52.0 53.3 61.761.6
Vehicle Noise:67.7 66.9 63.4 59.0 68.067.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
21 44 20696
22 47 220102
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
146
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:n/o Driveway 1
Road Name:Live Oaks Ave
Scenario:EA
11,072
8.25%
30.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:913 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
30.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.25
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
3.69
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -18.49 3.76 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -22.45 3.75 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.49
-4.86
-5.77
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
27.946
27.628
27.659
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.5 64.5 62.7 56.7 65.965.3
59.8
61.7
59.1 52.8 51.2 59.959.7
61.1 52.1 53.3 61.861.7
Vehicle Noise:67.8 66.9 63.5 59.1 68.067.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
21 45 20896
22 48 222103
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
147
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:n/o Goldenrain Dr
Road Name:Live Oaks Ave
Scenario:EA
9,498
8.25%
30.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:784 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
30.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.92
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
3.69
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -19.16 3.76 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -23.11 3.75 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.49
-4.86
-5.77
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
27.946
27.628
27.659
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.9 63.8 62.0 56.0 65.264.6
59.2
61.0
58.5 52.1 50.6 59.359.0
60.4 51.4 52.6 61.161.0
Vehicle Noise:67.1 66.2 62.8 58.4 67.466.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
19 40 18887
20 43 20093
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
148
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:n/o Jurupa Ave
Road Name:Live Oaks Ave
Scenario:EA
2,451
8.25%
40.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:202 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
40.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:36 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-7.80
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
2.02
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -25.04 2.07 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -29.00 2.06 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.59
-4.87
-5.56
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
36.069
35.823
35.847
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
57.3 56.3 54.5 48.4 57.757.1
51.6
53.4
50.9 44.5 43.0 51.751.5
52.8 43.8 45.1 53.553.4
Vehicle Noise:59.6 58.7 55.2 50.9 59.859.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
8 17 7836
8 18 8439
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
149
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:n/o Jurupa Ave
Road Name:Cherry Ave
Scenario:EA
16,480
8.25%
52.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,360 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
52.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:50 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
0.47
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.46
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -16.76 0.49 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -20.72 0.48 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.66
-4.87
-5.41
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
45.869
45.676
45.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.0 63.0 61.2 55.2 64.463.8
58.3
60.1
57.6 51.2 49.7 58.458.2
59.5 50.5 51.8 60.260.1
Vehicle Noise:66.3 65.4 61.9 57.6 66.566.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
29 61 285132
30 66 305141
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
150
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:s/o Jurupa Ave
Road Name:Cherry Ave
Scenario:EA
12,363
8.25%
52.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,020 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
52.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:50 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.77
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.46
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -18.01 0.49 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -21.97 0.48 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.66
-4.87
-5.41
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
45.869
45.676
45.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
62.8 61.7 60.0 53.9 63.162.5
57.0
58.9
56.4 50.0 48.4 57.156.9
58.3 49.3 50.5 59.058.9
Vehicle Noise:65.0 64.1 60.7 56.3 65.364.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
24 51 236109
25 54 252117
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
151
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:s/o Live Oaks Ave
Road Name:Cherry Ave
Scenario:EA
14,776
8.25%
52.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,219 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
52.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:50 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
0.00
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.46
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -17.24 0.49 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -21.19 0.48 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.66
-4.87
-5.41
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
45.869
45.676
45.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
63.6 62.5 60.7 54.7 63.963.3
57.8
59.7
57.1 50.8 49.2 57.957.7
59.1 50.0 51.3 59.859.6
Vehicle Noise:65.8 64.9 61.5 57.1 66.065.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
27 57 265123
28 61 283132
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
152
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:w/o Cherry Ave
Road Name:Jurupa Ave
Scenario:EA
24,207
8.25%
66.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,997 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
66.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:80 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
1.05
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.45
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -16.19 -0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -20.14 -0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.71
-4.88
-5.30
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
52.735
52.567
52.584
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.9 66.8 65.0 59.0 68.267.6
61.6
62.5
61.0 54.6 53.1 61.761.5
61.9 52.9 54.1 62.662.5
Vehicle Noise:69.7 68.8 65.6 61.0 70.069.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
61 132 612284
66 142 657305
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
153
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:e/o Cherry Ave
Road Name:Jurupa Ave
Scenario:EA
18,214
8.25%
66.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,503 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
66.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:80 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.18
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.45
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -17.42 -0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -21.38 -0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.71
-4.88
-5.30
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
52.735
52.567
52.584
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.6 65.6 63.8 57.7 67.066.4
60.4
61.2
59.7 53.4 51.8 60.560.3
60.7 51.6 52.9 61.461.2
Vehicle Noise:68.5 67.6 64.4 59.7 68.768.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
51 109 507235
54 117 543252
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
154
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:e/o Live Oaks Ave
Road Name:Jurupa Ave
Scenario:EA
26,853
8.25%
66.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,215 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
66.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:80 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
1.50
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.45
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -15.73 -0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -19.69 -0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.71
-4.88
-5.30
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
52.735
52.567
52.584
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.3 67.3 65.5 59.4 68.768.1
62.1
62.9
61.4 55.1 53.5 62.262.0
62.3 53.3 54.6 63.062.9
Vehicle Noise:70.2 69.2 66.1 61.4 70.470.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
66 141 656305
70 152 704327
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
155
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:w/o Cherry Ave
Road Name:Live Oaks Ave
Scenario:EAC
3,397
8.25%
30.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:280 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
30.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-4.92
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
3.69
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
70.80 -22.16 3.76 -1.20 0.000 0.000
77.97 -26.12 3.75 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.49
-4.86
-5.77
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
58.73
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
27.946
27.628
27.659
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
56.3 55.2 53.5 47.4 56.656.0
51.2
54.4
50.5 44.2 42.6 51.351.1
53.8 44.8 46.0 54.554.4
Vehicle Noise:59.2 58.4 54.4 50.6 59.459.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
6 12 5626
6 13 5928
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
156
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:e/o Cherry Ave
Road Name:Live Oaks Ave
Scenario:EAC
9,484
8.25%
30.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:782 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
30.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.93
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
3.69
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -19.16 3.76 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -23.12 3.75 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.49
-4.86
-5.77
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
27.946
27.628
27.659
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.9 63.8 62.0 56.0 65.264.6
59.1
61.0
58.5 52.1 50.6 59.359.0
60.4 51.4 52.6 61.161.0
Vehicle Noise:67.1 66.2 62.8 58.4 67.466.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
19 40 18787
20 43 20093
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
157
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:n/o Driveway 1
Road Name:Live Oaks Ave
Scenario:EAC
9,602
8.25%
30.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:792 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
30.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.87
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
3.69
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -19.11 3.76 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -23.07 3.75 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.49
-4.86
-5.77
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
27.946
27.628
27.659
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.9 63.9 62.1 56.0 65.364.7
59.2
61.1
58.5 52.2 50.6 59.359.1
60.5 51.4 52.7 61.261.0
Vehicle Noise:67.2 66.3 62.8 58.5 67.467.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
19 41 18988
20 43 20294
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
158
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:n/o Goldenrain Dr
Road Name:Live Oaks Ave
Scenario:EAC
9,130
8.25%
30.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:753 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
30.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.09
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
3.69
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -19.33 3.76 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -23.28 3.75 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.49
-4.86
-5.77
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
27.946
27.628
27.659
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.7 63.6 61.9 55.8 65.064.4
59.0
60.8
58.3 51.9 50.4 59.158.9
60.3 51.2 52.5 60.960.8
Vehicle Noise:66.9 66.1 62.6 58.2 67.266.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
18 39 18385
20 42 19591
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
159
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:n/o Jurupa Ave
Road Name:Live Oaks Ave
Scenario:EAC
2,359
8.25%
40.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:195 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
40.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:36 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-7.97
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
2.02
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -25.21 2.07 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -29.16 2.06 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.59
-4.87
-5.56
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
36.069
35.823
35.847
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
57.2 56.1 54.3 48.3 57.556.9
51.4
53.3
50.7 44.4 42.8 51.551.3
52.7 43.6 44.9 53.453.3
Vehicle Noise:59.4 58.5 55.1 50.7 59.659.2
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
8 16 7635
8 18 8238
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
160
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:n/o Jurupa Ave
Road Name:Cherry Ave
Scenario:EAC
16,862
8.25%
52.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,391 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
52.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:50 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
0.57
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.46
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -16.66 0.49 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -20.62 0.48 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.66
-4.87
-5.41
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
45.869
45.676
45.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.1 63.1 61.3 55.3 64.563.9
58.4
60.2
57.7 51.3 49.8 58.558.3
59.6 50.6 51.9 60.360.2
Vehicle Noise:66.4 65.5 62.0 57.7 66.666.2
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
29 62 290134
31 67 309144
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
161
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:s/o Jurupa Ave
Road Name:Cherry Ave
Scenario:EAC
11,920
8.25%
52.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:983 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
52.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:50 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.93
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.46
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -18.17 0.49 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -22.13 0.48 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.66
-4.87
-5.41
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
45.869
45.676
45.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
62.6 61.6 59.8 53.7 63.062.4
56.9
58.7
56.2 49.8 48.3 57.056.7
58.1 49.1 50.4 58.858.7
Vehicle Noise:64.9 64.0 60.5 56.2 65.164.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
23 50 230107
25 53 246114
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
162
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:s/o Live Oaks Ave
Road Name:Cherry Ave
Scenario:EAC
14,310
8.25%
52.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,181 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
52.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:50 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.14
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.46
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -17.38 0.49 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -21.33 0.48 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.66
-4.87
-5.41
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
45.869
45.676
45.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
63.4 62.4 60.6 54.5 63.863.2
57.7
59.5
57.0 50.6 49.1 57.857.5
58.9 49.9 51.1 59.659.5
Vehicle Noise:65.7 64.8 61.3 56.9 65.965.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
26 56 260121
28 60 277129
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
163
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:w/o Cherry Ave
Road Name:Jurupa Ave
Scenario:EAC
30,605
8.25%
66.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,525 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
66.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:80 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.07
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.45
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -15.17 -0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -19.12 -0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.71
-4.88
-5.30
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
52.735
52.567
52.584
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.9 67.8 66.1 60.0 69.268.6
62.7
63.5
62.0 55.6 54.1 62.862.5
62.9 53.9 55.1 63.663.5
Vehicle Noise:70.7 69.8 66.7 62.0 71.070.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
72 154 716332
77 165 768356
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
164
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:e/o Cherry Ave
Road Name:Jurupa Ave
Scenario:EAC
25,111
8.25%
66.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,072 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
66.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:80 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
1.21
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.45
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -16.03 -0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -19.98 -0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.71
-4.88
-5.30
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
52.735
52.567
52.584
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.0 67.0 65.2 59.1 68.467.8
61.8
62.6
61.1 54.8 53.2 61.961.7
62.1 53.0 54.3 62.762.6
Vehicle Noise:69.9 69.0 65.8 61.1 70.169.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
63 135 627291
67 145 673312
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
165
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:e/o Live Oaks Ave
Road Name:Jurupa Ave
Scenario:EAC
27,177
8.25%
66.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,242 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
66.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:80 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
1.56
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.45
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -15.68 -0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -19.64 -0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.71
-4.88
-5.30
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
52.735
52.567
52.584
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.4 67.3 65.5 59.5 68.768.1
62.1
63.0
61.5 55.1 53.6 62.362.0
62.4 53.4 54.6 63.163.0
Vehicle Noise:70.2 69.3 66.1 61.5 70.570.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
66 143 661307
71 153 710329
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
166
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:w/o Cherry Ave
Road Name:Live Oaks Ave
Scenario:EACP
3,397
8.25%
30.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:280 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
30.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
25 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-4.92
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
3.69
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
70.80 -22.16 3.76 -1.20 0.000 0.000
77.97 -26.12 3.75 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.49
-4.86
-5.77
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
58.73
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
27.946
27.628
27.659
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
56.3 55.2 53.5 47.4 56.656.0
51.2
54.4
50.5 44.2 42.6 51.351.1
53.8 44.8 46.0 54.554.4
Vehicle Noise:59.2 58.4 54.4 50.6 59.459.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
6 12 5626
6 13 5928
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
167
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:e/o Cherry Ave
Road Name:Live Oaks Ave
Scenario:EACP
10,952
8.25%
30.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:904 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
30.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.30
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
3.69
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -18.54 3.76 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -22.49 3.75 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.49
-4.86
-5.77
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
27.946
27.628
27.659
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.5 64.4 62.7 56.6 65.865.2
59.8
61.6
59.1 52.7 51.2 59.959.7
61.0 52.0 53.3 61.761.6
Vehicle Noise:67.7 66.9 63.4 59.0 68.067.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
21 44 20696
22 47 220102
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
168
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:n/o Driveway 1
Road Name:Live Oaks Ave
Scenario:EACP
11,072
8.25%
30.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:913 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
30.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.25
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
3.69
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -18.49 3.76 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -22.45 3.75 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.49
-4.86
-5.77
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
27.946
27.628
27.659
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.5 64.5 62.7 56.7 65.965.3
59.8
61.7
59.1 52.8 51.2 59.959.7
61.1 52.1 53.3 61.861.7
Vehicle Noise:67.8 66.9 63.5 59.1 68.067.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
21 45 20896
22 48 222103
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
169
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:n/o Goldenrain Dr
Road Name:Live Oaks Ave
Scenario:EACP
9,498
8.25%
30.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:784 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
30.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:24 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.92
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
3.69
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -19.16 3.76 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -23.11 3.75 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.49
-4.86
-5.77
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
27.946
27.628
27.659
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.9 63.8 62.0 56.0 65.264.6
59.2
61.0
58.5 52.1 50.6 59.359.0
60.4 51.4 52.6 61.161.0
Vehicle Noise:67.1 66.2 62.8 58.4 67.466.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
19 40 18887
20 43 20093
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
170
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:n/o Jurupa Ave
Road Name:Live Oaks Ave
Scenario:EACP
2,451
8.25%
40.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:202 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
40.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:36 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-7.80
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
2.02
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -25.04 2.07 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -29.00 2.06 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.59
-4.87
-5.56
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
36.069
35.823
35.847
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
57.3 56.3 54.5 48.4 57.757.1
51.6
53.4
50.9 44.5 43.0 51.751.5
52.8 43.8 45.1 53.553.4
Vehicle Noise:59.6 58.7 55.2 50.9 59.859.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
8 17 7836
8 18 8439
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
171
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:n/o Jurupa Ave
Road Name:Cherry Ave
Scenario:EACP
17,322
8.25%
52.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,429 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
52.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:50 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
0.69
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.46
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -16.55 0.49 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -20.50 0.48 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.66
-4.87
-5.41
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
45.869
45.676
45.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.3 63.2 61.4 55.4 64.664.0
58.5
60.3
57.8 51.5 49.9 58.658.4
59.8 50.7 52.0 60.560.3
Vehicle Noise:66.5 65.6 62.2 57.8 66.766.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
29 64 295137
32 68 315146
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
172
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:s/o Jurupa Ave
Road Name:Cherry Ave
Scenario:EACP
12,840
8.25%
52.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,059 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
52.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:50 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.61
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.46
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -17.85 0.49 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -21.80 0.48 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.66
-4.87
-5.41
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
45.869
45.676
45.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
63.0 61.9 60.1 54.1 63.362.7
57.2
59.0
56.5 50.2 48.6 57.357.1
58.5 49.4 50.7 59.259.0
Vehicle Noise:65.2 64.3 60.9 56.5 65.465.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
24 52 242112
26 56 258120
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
173
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:s/o Live Oaks Ave
Road Name:Cherry Ave
Scenario:EACP
14,860
8.25%
52.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,226 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
52.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
35 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:50 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
0.03
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.46
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
75.75 -17.21 0.49 -1.20 0.000 0.000
81.57 -21.17 0.48 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.66
-4.87
-5.41
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
64.30
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
45.869
45.676
45.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
63.6 62.5 60.8 54.7 63.963.3
57.8
59.7
57.1 50.8 49.2 57.957.7
59.1 50.1 51.3 59.859.7
Vehicle Noise:65.8 64.9 61.5 57.1 66.165.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
27 57 266124
28 61 284132
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
174
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:w/o Cherry Ave
Road Name:Jurupa Ave
Scenario:EACP
31,065
8.25%
66.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,563 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
66.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:80 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.14
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.45
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -15.10 -0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -19.06 -0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.71
-4.88
-5.30
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
52.735
52.567
52.584
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.9 67.9 66.1 60.1 69.368.7
62.7
63.6
62.0 55.7 54.1 62.862.6
63.0 53.9 55.2 63.763.5
Vehicle Noise:70.8 69.9 66.7 62.1 71.170.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
72 156 723336
78 167 776360
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
175
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:e/o Cherry Ave
Road Name:Jurupa Ave
Scenario:EACP
25,111
8.25%
66.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,072 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
66.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:80 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
1.21
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.45
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -16.03 -0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -19.98 -0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.71
-4.88
-5.30
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
52.735
52.567
52.584
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.0 67.0 65.2 59.1 68.467.8
61.8
62.6
61.1 54.8 53.2 61.961.7
62.1 53.0 54.3 62.762.6
Vehicle Noise:69.9 69.0 65.8 61.1 70.169.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
63 135 627291
67 145 673312
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
176
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:Southbridge Fontana
Job Number:14713
Road Segment:e/o Live Oaks Ave
Road Name:Jurupa Ave
Scenario:EACP
27,453
8.25%
66.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,265 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
66.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:80 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
1.60
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.45
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -15.64 -0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -19.59 -0.43 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.71
-4.88
-5.30
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
52.735
52.567
52.584
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.4 67.3 65.6 59.5 68.868.1
62.2
63.0
61.5 55.1 53.6 62.362.1
62.4 53.4 54.7 63.163.0
Vehicle Noise:70.3 69.3 66.2 61.5 70.570.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
67 143 666309
71 154 714332
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
177
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
This page intentionally left blank
178
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
APPENDIX 10.1:
OPERATIONAL MODEL
179
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
This page intentionally left blank
180
14713 - Southridge Fontana
CadnaA Noise Prediction Model: 14713-02_Operational.cna
Date: 25.08.22
Analyst: B. Maddux
Calculation Configuration
Configuration
Parameter Value
General
Max. Error (dB)0.00
Max. Search Radius (#(Unit,LEN))2000.01
Min. Dist Src to Rcvr 0.00
Partition
Raster Factor 0.50
Max. Length of Section (#(Unit,LEN))999.99
Min. Length of Section (#(Unit,LEN))1.01
Min. Length of Section (%)0.00
Proj. Line Sources On
Proj. Area Sources On
Ref. Time
Reference Time Day (min)960.00
Reference Time Night (min)480.00
Daytime Penalty (dB)0.00
Recr. Time Penalty (dB)5.00
Night-time Penalty (dB)10.00
DTM
Standard Height (m)0.00
Model of Terrain Triangulation
Reflection
max. Order of Reflection 2
Search Radius Src 100.00
Search Radius Rcvr 100.00
Max. Distance Source - Rcvr 1000.00 1000.00
Min. Distance Rvcr - Reflector 1.00 1.00
Min. Distance Source - Reflector 0.10
Industrial (ISO 9613)
Lateral Diffraction some Obj
Obst. within Area Src do not shield On
Screening Incl. Ground Att. over Barrier
Dz with limit (20/25)
Barrier Coefficients C1,2,3 3.0 20.0 0.0
Temperature (#(Unit,TEMP))10
rel. Humidity (%)70
Ground Absorption G 0.50
Wind Speed for Dir. (#(Unit,SPEED))3.0
Roads (TNM)
Railways (FTA/FRA)
Aircraft (???)
Strictly acc. to AzB
Receiver Noise Levels
Name M.ID Level Lr Limit. Value Land Use Height Coordinates
Day Night CNEL Day Night CNEL Type Auto Noise Type X Y Z
(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)
R1 R1 34.1 31.3 38.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 5.00 a 6188540.10 2325712.13 5.00
R2 R2 27.3 24.6 31.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 5.00 a 6191279.80 2325040.72 5.00
R3 R3 35.4 32.7 39.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 5.00 a 6189839.91 2323229.61 5.00
R4 R4 48.3 45.5 52.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 5.00 a 6188805.03 2323412.85 5.00
R5 R5 45.1 42.4 49.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 5.00 a 6188275.09 2323642.02 5.00
R6 R6 40.4 37.7 44.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 5.00 a 6187797.03 2323892.34 5.00
R7 R7 43.2 40.5 47.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 5.00 a 6188180.22 2325192.42 5.00
Point Source(s)
Name M.ID Result. PWL Lw / Li Operating Time Height Coordinates
Day Evening Night Type Value norm.Day Special Night X Y Z
(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)dB(A)(min)(min)(min)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)
AC001 AC001 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188283.35 2325162.83 3.00
AC002 AC002 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188384.63 2325152.66 3.00
AC003 AC003 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188280.71 2325149.27 3.00
AC004 AC004 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188263.02 2325087.14 3.00
AC005 AC005 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188257.37 2325073.97 3.00
AC006 AC006 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188341.71 2325172.99 3.00
AC007 AC007 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188346.60 2325171.86 3.00
AC008 AC008 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188351.12 2325136.47 3.00
AC009 AC009 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188350.37 2325132.33 3.00
AC010 AC010 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188347.36 2325026.15 3.00
AC011 AC011 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188328.91 2325061.16 3.00
Urban Crossroads, Inc.181
Name M.ID Result. PWL Lw / Li Operating Time Height Coordinates
Day Evening Night Type Value norm.Day Special Night X Y Z
(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)dB(A)(min)(min)(min)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)
AC012 AC012 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188328.53 2325056.65 3.00
AC013 AC013 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188299.92 2325035.18 3.00
AC014 AC014 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188304.81 2325034.05 3.00
AC015 AC015 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188287.87 2325110.11 3.00
AC016 AC016 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188292.38 2325108.98 3.00
AC017 AC017 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188288.14 2325116.05 3.00
AC018 AC018 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188291.39 2325114.96 3.00
AC019 AC019 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188250.48 2324948.45 3.00
AC020 AC020 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188332.71 2325006.36 3.00
AC021 AC021 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188286.28 2325016.40 3.00
AC022 AC022 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188231.76 2324993.24 3.00
AC023 AC023 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188303.96 2324978.77 3.00
AC024 AC024 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188248.14 2324942.93 3.00
AC025 AC025 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188232.28 2324979.44 3.00
AC026 AC026 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188252.80 2324942.86 3.00
AC027 AC027 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188303.75 2324982.97 3.00
AC028 AC028 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188276.91 2324872.70 3.00
AC029 AC029 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188247.06 2324948.77 3.00
AC030 AC030 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188226.66 2324900.80 3.00
AC031 AC031 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188229.16 2324914.91 3.00
AC032 AC032 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188281.93 2324872.71 3.00
AC033 AC033 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188299.90 2324900.11 3.00
AC034 AC034 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188291.31 2325016.41 3.00
AC035 AC035 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188299.24 2324904.59 3.00
AC036 AC036 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188325.16 2324874.69 3.00
AC037 AC037 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188337.28 2324839.79 3.00
AC038 AC038 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188281.08 2324817.66 3.00
AC039 AC039 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188321.01 2324807.46 3.00
AC040 AC040 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188322.31 2324804.20 3.00
AC041 AC041 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188315.80 2324805.29 3.00
AC042 AC042 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188317.97 2324801.60 3.00
AC043 AC043 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188259.81 2324816.79 3.00
AC044 AC044 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188256.55 2324815.49 3.00
AC045 AC045 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188218.14 2324772.74 3.00
AC046 AC046 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188223.35 2324761.67 3.00
AC047 AC047 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188249.39 2324738.67 3.00
AC048 AC048 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188253.08 2324740.18 3.00
AC049 AC049 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188251.56 2324733.89 3.00
AC050 AC050 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188255.03 2324734.54 3.00
AC051 AC051 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188248.31 2324698.30 3.00
AC052 AC052 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188251.13 2324686.58 3.00
AC053 AC053 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188308.42 2324681.59 3.00
AC054 AC054 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188311.67 2324683.11 3.00
AC055 AC055 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188327.52 2324696.35 3.00
AC056 AC056 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188384.59 2324718.48 3.00
AC057 AC057 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188343.79 2324732.59 3.00
AC058 AC058 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188345.31 2324728.47 3.00
AC059 AC059 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188349.22 2324733.46 3.00
AC060 AC060 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188350.95 2324729.55 3.00
AC061 AC061 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188390.71 2324560.24 3.00
AC062 AC062 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188416.77 2324649.60 3.00
AC063 AC063 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188395.04 2324557.28 3.00
AC064 AC064 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188482.31 2324605.05 3.00
AC065 AC065 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188478.05 2324601.20 3.00
AC066 AC066 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188479.46 2324564.51 3.00
AC067 AC067 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188356.52 2324566.43 3.00
AC068 AC068 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188470.77 2324542.00 3.00
AC069 AC069 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188359.16 2324632.46 3.00
AC070 AC070 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188397.68 2324559.64 3.00
AC071 AC071 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188516.82 2324613.01 3.00
AC072 AC072 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188419.18 2324516.59 3.00
AC073 AC073 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188410.69 2324525.15 3.00
AC074 AC074 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188346.33 2324573.20 3.00
AC075 AC075 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188419.14 2324654.07 3.00
AC076 AC076 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188357.05 2324629.66 3.00
AC077 AC077 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188416.34 2324656.18 3.00
AC078 AC078 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188413.51 2324692.27 3.00
AC079 AC079 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188413.01 2324651.63 3.00
AC080 AC080 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188472.77 2324544.98 3.00
AC081 AC081 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188376.90 2324644.22 3.00
AC082 AC082 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188474.61 2324603.94 3.00
AC083 AC083 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188478.80 2324607.50 3.00
AC084 AC084 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188393.08 2324563.45 3.00
AC085 AC085 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188545.42 2324545.95 3.00
AC086 AC086 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188603.26 2324500.30 3.00
AC087 AC087 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188645.46 2324509.36 3.00
AC088 AC088 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188519.36 2324456.60 3.00
Urban Crossroads, Inc.182
Name M.ID Result. PWL Lw / Li Operating Time Height Coordinates
Day Evening Night Type Value norm.Day Special Night X Y Z
(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)dB(A)(min)(min)(min)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)
AC089 AC089 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188610.96 2324501.41 3.00
AC090 AC090 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188606.69 2324497.56 3.00
AC091 AC091 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188607.45 2324503.85 3.00
AC092 AC092 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188544.98 2324552.54 3.00
AC093 AC093 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188547.82 2324412.94 3.00
AC094 AC094 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188523.69 2324453.64 3.00
AC095 AC095 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188601.41 2324441.34 3.00
AC096 AC096 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188547.78 2324550.43 3.00
AC097 AC097 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188608.11 2324460.87 3.00
AC098 AC098 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188599.41 2324438.35 3.00
AC099 AC099 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188542.16 2324588.63 3.00
AC100 AC100 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188505.54 2324540.58 3.00
AC101 AC101 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188539.34 2324421.51 3.00
AC102 AC102 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188541.65 2324547.98 3.00
AC103 AC103 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188526.32 2324455.99 3.00
AC104 AC104 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188485.17 2324462.78 3.00
AC105 AC105 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188521.73 2324459.81 3.00
AC106 AC106 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188474.98 2324469.55 3.00
AC107 AC107 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188487.80 2324528.82 3.00
AC108 AC108 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188485.69 2324526.02 3.00
AC109 AC109 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188642.44 2324359.89 3.00
AC110 AC110 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188606.55 2324435.07 3.00
AC111 AC111 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188640.48 2324366.06 3.00
AC112 AC112 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188666.53 2324456.68 3.00
AC113 AC113 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188658.09 2324327.76 3.00
AC114 AC114 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188725.44 2324403.81 3.00
AC115 AC115 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188666.57 2324319.19 3.00
AC116 AC116 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188720.16 2324347.59 3.00
AC117 AC117 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188638.11 2324362.85 3.00
AC118 AC118 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188660.40 2324454.23 3.00
AC119 AC119 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188593.73 2324375.80 3.00
AC120 AC120 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188729.71 2324407.66 3.00
AC121 AC121 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188718.16 2324344.60 3.00
AC122 AC122 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188726.20 2324410.10 3.00
AC123 AC123 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188764.21 2324415.61 3.00
AC124 AC124 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188663.73 2324458.79 3.00
AC125 AC125 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188726.86 2324367.12 3.00
AC126 AC126 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188603.92 2324369.03 3.00
AC127 AC127 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188660.91 2324494.88 3.00
AC128 AC128 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188604.44 2324432.27 3.00
AC129 AC129 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188664.17 2324452.20 3.00
AC130 AC130 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188645.07 2324362.24 3.00
AC131 AC131 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188624.29 2324446.83 3.00
AC132 AC132 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188722.01 2324406.55 3.00
AC133 AC133 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188944.13 2324211.86 3.00
AC134 AC134 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188865.15 2324282.50 3.00
AC135 AC135 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188906.39 2324219.03 3.00
AC136 AC136 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188908.91 2324215.58 3.00
AC137 AC137 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188872.27 2324320.45 3.00
AC138 AC138 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188861.46 2324279.04 3.00
AC139 AC139 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188815.18 2324163.36 3.00
AC140 AC140 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188903.63 2324213.33 3.00
AC141 AC141 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188858.56 2324282.19 3.00
AC142 AC142 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188769.98 2324229.75 3.00
AC143 AC143 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188893.01 2324178.17 3.00
AC144 AC144 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188901.27 2324217.04 3.00
AC145 AC145 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188863.19 2324285.41 3.00
AC146 AC146 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188777.40 2324220.03 3.00
AC147 AC147 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188814.10 2324200.20 3.00
AC148 AC148 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188877.46 2324159.72 3.00
AC149 AC149 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188822.01 2324286.95 3.00
AC150 AC150 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188880.32 2324161.89 3.00
AC151 AC151 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188798.50 2324279.65 3.00
AC152 AC152 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188820.41 2324152.50 3.00
AC153 AC153 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188801.40 2324281.61 3.00
AC154 AC154 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188807.71 2324203.04 3.00
AC155 AC155 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188810.84 2324198.83 3.00
AC156 AC156 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188811.00 2324205.31 3.00
AC157 AC157 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188891.92 2324064.81 3.00
AC158 AC158 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188951.33 2324144.93 3.00
AC159 AC159 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188892.48 2324071.26 3.00
AC160 AC160 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188944.73 2324145.02 3.00
AC161 AC161 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188947.43 2324141.70 3.00
AC162 AC162 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188853.06 2324098.21 3.00
AC163 AC163 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188955.98 2324021.62 3.00
AC164 AC164 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188894.04 2324029.13 3.00
AC165 AC165 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188895.26 2324065.97 3.00
Urban Crossroads, Inc.183
Name M.ID Result. PWL Lw / Li Operating Time Height Coordinates
Day Evening Night Type Value norm.Day Special Night X Y Z
(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)dB(A)(min)(min)(min)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)
AC166 AC166 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188949.56 2324147.95 3.00
AC167 AC167 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188859.87 2324088.04 3.00
AC168 AC168 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188958.97 2324023.61 3.00
AC169 AC169 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188898.58 2324017.97 3.00
AC170 AC170 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188889.06 2324069.20 3.00
AC171 AC171 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188966.54 2324177.67 3.00
AC172 AC172 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188914.28 2324148.40 3.00
AC173 AC173 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188890.78 2324143.32 3.00
AC174 AC174 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188887.76 2324141.54 3.00
AC175 AC175 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188973.17 2324032.82 3.00
AC176 AC176 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189026.28 2324063.26 3.00
AC177 AC177 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188989.20 2324072.65 3.00
AC178 AC178 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188981.66 2324074.58 3.00
AC179 AC179 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188986.89 2324076.25 3.00
AC180 AC180 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188983.78 2324070.73 3.00
AC181 AC181 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188957.55 2324004.04 3.00
AC182 AC182 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189019.35 2324010.45 3.00
AC183 AC183 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188929.66 2323950.54 3.00
AC184 AC184 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189042.96 2323895.32 3.00
AC185 AC185 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188960.57 2324005.82 3.00
AC186 AC186 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189058.99 2323935.15 3.00
AC187 AC187 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189017.23 2324004.20 3.00
AC188 AC188 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188965.05 2323928.47 3.00
AC189 AC189 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189014.53 2324007.52 3.00
AC190 AC190 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188958.85 2323931.70 3.00
AC191 AC191 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189056.69 2323938.75 3.00
AC192 AC192 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189096.07 2323925.76 3.00
AC193 AC193 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188984.07 2324010.90 3.00
AC194 AC194 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189028.76 2323886.11 3.00
AC195 AC195 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188961.71 2323927.31 3.00
AC196 AC196 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189053.57 2323933.23 3.00
AC197 AC197 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188968.38 2323880.47 3.00
AC198 AC198 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189025.77 2323884.12 3.00
AC199 AC199 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188963.83 2323891.63 3.00
AC200 AC200 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189036.33 2324040.17 3.00
AC201 AC201 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188962.27 2323933.76 3.00
AC202 AC202 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189051.45 2323937.08 3.00
AC203 AC203 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189021.13 2324007.43 3.00
AC204 AC204 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188922.85 2323960.71 3.00
AC205 AC205 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188991.08 2323826.33 3.00
AC206 AC206 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189127.22 2323800.77 3.00
AC207 AC207 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189087.58 2323876.07 3.00
AC208 AC208 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189089.36 2323873.05 3.00
AC209 AC209 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189029.94 2323792.93 3.00
AC210 AC210 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189104.56 2323905.80 3.00
AC211 AC211 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189094.00 2323749.74 3.00
AC212 AC212 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189052.30 2323876.53 3.00
AC213 AC213 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189028.80 2323871.44 3.00
AC214 AC214 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189121.80 2323798.86 3.00
AC215 AC215 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189119.68 2323802.70 3.00
AC216 AC216 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188997.89 2323816.17 3.00
AC217 AC217 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189036.60 2323746.09 3.00
AC218 AC218 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189164.30 2323791.38 3.00
AC219 AC219 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189027.08 2323797.33 3.00
AC220 AC220 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189030.50 2323799.38 3.00
AC221 AC221 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189111.19 2323760.94 3.00
AC222 AC222 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189124.91 2323804.38 3.00
AC223 AC223 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189085.45 2323869.83 3.00
AC224 AC224 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189082.76 2323873.15 3.00
AC225 AC225 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189032.06 2323757.26 3.00
AC226 AC226 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189033.28 2323794.10 3.00
AC227 AC227 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189096.99 2323751.73 3.00
AC228 AC228 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189025.78 2323869.67 3.00
AC229 AC229 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188732.94 2323598.92 3.00
AC230 AC230 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188713.31 2323579.81 3.00
AC231 AC231 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188784.00 2323477.87 3.00
AC232 AC232 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188841.40 2323527.75 3.00
AC233 AC233 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188774.51 2323485.31 3.00
AC234 AC234 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188872.43 2323580.52 3.00
AC235 AC235 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188763.81 2323650.25 3.00
AC236 AC236 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188833.64 2323512.71 3.00
AC237 AC237 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188832.03 2323509.50 3.00
AC238 AC238 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188715.06 2323582.85 3.00
AC239 AC239 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188707.55 2323527.24 3.00
AC240 AC240 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188718.50 2323521.79 3.00
AC241 AC241 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188835.53 2323573.45 3.00
AC242 AC242 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188835.57 2323567.11 3.00
Urban Crossroads, Inc.184
Name M.ID Result. PWL Lw / Li Operating Time Height Coordinates
Day Evening Night Type Value norm.Day Special Night X Y Z
(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)dB(A)(min)(min)(min)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)
AC243 AC243 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188831.82 2323569.41 3.00
AC244 AC244 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188839.32 2323571.47 3.00
AC245 AC245 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188771.35 2323610.19 3.00
AC246 AC246 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188767.36 2323611.74 3.00
AC247 AC247 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188773.14 2323614.93 3.00
AC248 AC248 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188770.10 2323616.67 3.00
AC249 AC249 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188760.80 2323517.63 3.00
AC250 AC250 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188758.48 2323514.96 3.00
AC251 AC251 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188755.76 2323520.84 3.00
AC252 AC252 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188753.81 2323517.36 3.00
AC253 AC253 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188924.97 2323446.23 3.00
AC254 AC254 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188919.94 2323447.71 3.00
AC255 AC255 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188921.21 2323451.50 3.00
AC256 AC256 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188884.42 2323445.47 3.00
AC257 AC257 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188998.24 2323454.59 3.00
AC258 AC258 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188956.97 2323414.55 3.00
AC259 AC259 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188989.75 2323518.08 3.00
AC260 AC260 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188990.96 2323511.86 3.00
AC261 AC261 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188917.40 2323548.32 3.00
AC262 AC262 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188884.21 2323523.94 3.00
AC263 AC263 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188919.84 2323542.18 3.00
AC264 AC264 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188869.64 2323504.81 3.00
AC265 AC265 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188946.26 2323420.09 3.00
AC266 AC266 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188920.71 2323547.17 3.00
AC267 AC267 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188993.84 2323516.83 3.00
AC268 AC268 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189004.05 2323474.27 3.00
AC269 AC269 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188915.63 2323542.96 3.00
AC270 AC270 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189024.67 2323531.91 3.00
AC271 AC271 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188872.64 2323448.77 3.00
AC272 AC272 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188986.85 2323513.41 3.00
AC273 AC273 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188926.75 2323449.28 3.00
AC274 AC274 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188999.23 2323458.04 3.00
AC275 AC275 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188868.49 2323501.50 3.00
AC276 AC276 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188904.95 2323580.13 3.00
AC277 AC277 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189074.35 2323487.79 3.00
AC278 AC278 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189073.59 2323388.34 3.00
AC279 AC279 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189152.87 2323398.67 3.00
AC280 AC280 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189071.04 2323488.94 3.00
AC281 AC281 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189022.14 2323442.12 3.00
AC282 AC282 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189080.40 2323389.90 3.00
AC283 AC283 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189157.69 2323414.90 3.00
AC284 AC284 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189178.32 2323472.53 3.00
AC285 AC285 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189078.61 2323386.85 3.00
AC286 AC286 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189143.39 2323458.70 3.00
AC287 AC287 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189140.50 2323454.03 3.00
AC288 AC288 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189099.91 2323360.71 3.00
AC289 AC289 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189147.48 2323457.46 3.00
AC290 AC290 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189073.48 2323482.81 3.00
AC291 AC291 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189058.59 2323520.75 3.00
AC292 AC292 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189038.06 2323386.09 3.00
AC293 AC293 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189023.28 2323445.44 3.00
AC294 AC294 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189037.85 2323464.56 3.00
AC295 AC295 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189110.61 2323355.17 3.00
AC296 AC296 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189069.27 2323483.58 3.00
AC297 AC297 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189151.89 2323395.21 3.00
AC298 AC298 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189144.61 2323452.48 3.00
AC299 AC299 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189074.85 2323392.12 3.00
AC300 AC300 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189026.29 2323389.40 3.00
AC301 AC301 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188692.09 2323618.21 3.00
AC302 AC302 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188623.50 2323643.22 3.00
AC303 AC303 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188627.67 2323608.36 3.00
AC304 AC304 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188703.73 2323630.49 3.00
AC305 AC305 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188713.91 2323673.06 3.00
AC306 AC306 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188620.53 2323641.31 3.00
AC307 AC307 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188709.09 2323669.92 3.00
AC308 AC308 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188660.02 2323735.75 3.00
AC309 AC309 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188634.71 2323598.57 3.00
AC310 AC310 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188662.45 2323733.23 3.00
AC311 AC311 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188659.42 2323729.18 3.00
AC312 AC312 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188597.74 2323718.60 3.00
AC313 AC313 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188619.39 2323729.05 3.00
AC314 AC314 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188689.64 2323615.57 3.00
AC315 AC315 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188595.21 2323716.16 3.00
AC316 AC316 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188663.33 2323769.75 3.00
AC317 AC317 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188575.03 2323667.28 3.00
AC318 AC318 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188619.56 2323647.71 3.00
AC319 AC319 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188656.02 2323731.78 3.00
Urban Crossroads, Inc.185
Name M.ID Result. PWL Lw / Li Operating Time Height Coordinates
Day Evening Night Type Value norm.Day Special Night X Y Z
(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)dB(A)(min)(min)(min)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)
AC320 AC320 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188584.03 2323659.00 3.00
AC321 AC321 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188710.83 2323676.02 3.00
AC322 AC322 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188748.23 2323672.53 3.00
AC323 AC323 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188616.72 2323644.91 3.00
AC324 AC324 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188706.13 2323673.17 3.00
AC325 AC325 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188583.45 2323867.57 3.00
AC326 AC326 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188572.60 2323747.08 3.00
AC327 AC327 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188608.87 2323794.77 3.00
AC328 AC328 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188515.30 2323800.89 3.00
AC329 AC329 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188548.34 2323878.32 3.00
AC330 AC330 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188484.58 2323836.87 3.00
AC331 AC331 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188614.28 2323795.72 3.00
AC332 AC332 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188521.13 2323875.09 3.00
AC333 AC333 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188512.24 2323762.85 3.00
AC334 AC334 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188515.24 2323751.18 3.00
AC335 AC335 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188518.96 2323802.47 3.00
AC336 AC336 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188610.45 2323790.67 3.00
AC337 AC337 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188524.36 2323876.44 3.00
AC338 AC338 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188517.54 2323796.15 3.00
AC339 AC339 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188616.08 2323791.84 3.00
AC340 AC340 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188521.01 2323796.85 3.00
AC341 AC341 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188589.98 2323866.58 3.00
AC342 AC342 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188489.96 2323825.88 3.00
AC343 AC343 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188575.83 2323748.65 3.00
AC344 AC344 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188604.05 2323900.30 3.00
AC345 AC345 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188588.62 2323869.82 3.00
AC346 AC346 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188591.14 2323755.87 3.00
AC347 AC347 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188585.68 2323863.91 3.00
AC348 AC348 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188647.87 2323778.89 3.00
AC349 AC349 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188522.73 2323894.96 3.00
AC350 AC350 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188597.70 2323916.93 3.00
AC351 AC351 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188441.94 2323992.85 3.00
AC352 AC352 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188549.02 2324013.93 3.00
AC353 AC353 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188509.94 2324026.90 3.00
AC354 AC354 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188538.75 2323900.42 3.00
AC355 AC355 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188545.43 2324008.39 3.00
AC356 AC356 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188446.05 2323981.33 3.00
AC357 AC357 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188543.63 2324012.27 3.00
AC358 AC358 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188473.65 2323949.01 3.00
AC359 AC359 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188567.77 2324042.49 3.00
AC360 AC360 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188461.12 2323916.21 3.00
AC361 AC361 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188462.80 2323904.27 3.00
AC362 AC362 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188482.55 2324026.74 3.00
AC363 AC363 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188472.25 2323954.81 3.00
AC364 AC364 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188468.43 2323953.66 3.00
AC365 AC365 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188560.73 2323937.08 3.00
AC366 AC366 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188485.91 2324027.72 3.00
AC367 AC367 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188566.21 2323937.42 3.00
AC368 AC368 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188550.01 2324010.56 3.00
AC369 AC369 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188567.56 2323933.37 3.00
AC370 AC370 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188561.84 2323932.83 3.00
AC371 AC371 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188470.13 2323948.70 3.00
AC372 AC372 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188519.34 2323893.76 3.00
AC373 AC373 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188481.84 2324060.17 3.00
AC374 AC374 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188524.34 2324099.24 3.00
AC375 AC375 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188512.51 2324176.97 3.00
AC376 AC376 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188507.93 2324174.80 3.00
AC377 AC377 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188434.75 2324121.22 3.00
AC378 AC378 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188530.27 2324208.89 3.00
AC379 AC379 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188430.93 2324120.07 3.00
AC380 AC380 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188530.06 2324099.77 3.00
AC381 AC381 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188436.15 2324115.42 3.00
AC382 AC382 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188523.23 2324103.49 3.00
AC383 AC383 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188432.63 2324115.10 3.00
AC384 AC384 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188472.44 2324193.31 3.00
AC385 AC385 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188423.62 2324082.61 3.00
AC386 AC386 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188425.30 2324070.68 3.00
AC387 AC387 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188506.13 2324178.68 3.00
AC388 AC388 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188485.23 2324061.37 3.00
AC389 AC389 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188408.55 2324147.74 3.00
AC390 AC390 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188528.71 2324103.83 3.00
AC391 AC391 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188501.25 2324066.82 3.00
AC392 AC392 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188445.05 2324193.14 3.00
AC393 AC393 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188404.44 2324159.26 3.00
AC394 AC394 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188448.41 2324194.13 3.00
AC395 AC395 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188560.20 2324083.34 3.00
AC396 AC396 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188511.52 2324180.34 3.00
Urban Crossroads, Inc.186
Name M.ID Result. PWL Lw / Li Operating Time Height Coordinates
Day Evening Night Type Value norm.Day Special Night X Y Z
(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)dB(A)(min)(min)(min)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)
AC397 AC397 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188152.22 2324507.25 3.00
AC398 AC398 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188139.55 2324511.24 3.00
AC399 AC399 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188082.61 2324530.34 3.00
AC400 AC400 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188069.41 2324534.50 3.00
AC401 AC401 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188113.51 2324388.85 3.00
AC402 AC402 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188101.36 2324392.84 3.00
AC403 AC403 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188043.37 2324412.11 3.00
AC404 AC404 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188031.04 2324416.10 3.00
AC405 AC405 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6187987.64 2324281.55 3.00
AC406 AC406 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188070.11 2324254.30 3.00
AC407 AC407 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6187999.97 2324277.56 3.00
AC408 AC408 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188096.15 2324376.69 3.00
AC409 AC409 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188039.20 2324395.79 3.00
AC410 AC410 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188057.95 2324258.29 3.00
AC411 AC411 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188026.01 2324399.96 3.00
AC412 AC412 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188108.82 2324372.70 3.00
AC413 AC413 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6187982.26 2324267.32 3.00
AC414 AC414 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6187956.22 2324144.92 3.00
AC415 AC415 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188014.20 2324125.65 3.00
AC416 AC416 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6187943.89 2324148.91 3.00
AC417 AC417 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188026.36 2324121.66 3.00
AC418 AC418 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188052.40 2324244.05 3.00
AC419 AC419 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6187995.45 2324263.15 3.00
AC420 AC420 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188065.07 2324240.06 3.00
AC421 AC421 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6187901.53 2324017.66 3.00
AC422 AC422 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6187913.86 2324013.67 3.00
AC423 AC423 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188010.04 2324112.80 3.00
AC424 AC424 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6187953.09 2324131.90 3.00
AC425 AC425 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6187939.90 2324136.07 3.00
AC426 AC426 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188022.71 2324108.81 3.00
AC427 AC427 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6187983.99 2323990.41 3.00
AC428 AC428 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6187971.84 2323994.40 3.00
AC429 AC429 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188212.47 2323995.27 3.00
AC430 AC430 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188238.51 2324117.66 3.00
AC431 AC431 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188200.31 2323999.26 3.00
AC432 AC432 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188181.56 2324136.76 3.00
AC433 AC433 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188168.37 2324140.93 3.00
AC434 AC434 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188130.00 2324022.53 3.00
AC435 AC435 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188142.33 2324018.53 3.00
AC436 AC436 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188251.18 2324113.67 3.00
AC437 AC437 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188258.13 2324137.98 3.00
AC438 AC438 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188188.51 2324161.07 3.00
AC439 AC439 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188175.31 2324165.23 3.00
AC440 AC440 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188245.45 2324141.97 3.00
AC441 AC441 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188234.34 2324279.12 3.00
AC442 AC442 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188221.15 2324283.29 3.00
AC443 AC443 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188230.18 2324313.15 3.00
AC444 AC444 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188264.90 2324301.00 3.00
AC445 AC445 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188263.36 2324433.12 3.00
AC446 AC446 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188298.78 2324421.32 3.00
AC447 AC447 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188311.28 2324416.45 3.00
AC448 AC448 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188321.00 2324255.34 3.00
AC449 AC449 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188331.42 2324246.32 3.00
AC450 AC450 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188380.03 2324201.87 3.00
AC451 AC451 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188358.50 2324325.48 3.00
AC452 AC452 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188398.78 2324368.54 3.00
AC453 AC453 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188497.39 2324283.12 3.00
AC454 AC454 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188454.34 2324237.29 3.00
AC455 AC455 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188677.95 2324053.95 3.00
AC456 AC456 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188690.45 2324056.04 3.00
AC457 AC457 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188750.17 2324069.93 3.00
AC458 AC458 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188763.36 2324072.70 3.00
AC459 AC459 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188702.95 2323934.51 3.00
AC460 AC460 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188715.45 2323936.59 3.00
AC461 AC461 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188788.36 2323953.26 3.00
AC462 AC462 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188775.17 2323950.48 3.00
AC463 AC463 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188803.30 2323930.17 3.00
AC464 AC464 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188815.16 2323936.60 3.00
AC465 AC465 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188738.66 2323894.23 3.00
AC466 AC466 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188750.04 2323899.79 3.00
AC467 AC467 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188806.29 2323787.29 3.00
AC468 AC468 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188871.41 2323824.10 3.00
AC469 AC469 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188859.55 2323817.67 3.00
AC470 AC470 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188794.91 2323781.73 3.00
AC471 AC471 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188893.58 2323807.94 3.00
AC472 AC472 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188840.32 2323777.57 3.00
AC473 AC473 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188905.43 2323814.38 3.00
Urban Crossroads, Inc.187
Name M.ID Result. PWL Lw / Li Operating Time Height Coordinates
Day Evening Night Type Value norm.Day Special Night X Y Z
(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)dB(A)(min)(min)(min)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)
AC474 AC474 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188828.93 2323772.00 3.00
AC475 AC475 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188963.93 2323699.79 3.00
AC476 AC476 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188952.54 2323694.23 3.00
AC477 AC477 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189052.95 2323635.90 3.00
AC478 AC478 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189059.89 2323649.09 3.00
AC479 AC479 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189080.72 2323706.73 3.00
AC480 AC480 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189168.22 2323591.45 3.00
AC481 AC481 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189172.39 2323603.95 3.00
AC482 AC482 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189195.31 2323660.90 3.00
AC483 AC483 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189200.17 2323672.70 3.00
AC484 AC484 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189216.49 2323427.33 3.00
AC485 AC485 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189218.26 2323432.69 3.00
AC486 AC486 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189205.81 2323464.50 3.00
AC487 AC487 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189221.58 2323431.54 3.00
AC488 AC488 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189185.08 2323408.31 3.00
AC489 AC489 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189220.70 2323426.56 3.00
AC490 AC490 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189251.30 2323304.46 3.00
AC491 AC491 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189174.67 2323389.19 3.00
AC492 AC492 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189231.78 2323333.65 3.00
AC493 AC493 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189226.24 2323335.87 3.00
AC494 AC494 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189230.00 2323330.60 3.00
AC495 AC495 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189224.97 2323332.09 3.00
AC496 AC496 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189177.68 2323333.15 3.00
AC497 AC497 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189173.53 2323385.87 3.00
AC498 AC498 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189189.45 2323329.84 3.00
AC499 AC499 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189288.10 2323289.88 3.00
AC500 AC500 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189266.81 2323316.02 3.00
AC501 AC501 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189340.08 2323324.38 3.00
AC502 AC502 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189298.81 2323284.34 3.00
AC503 AC503 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189268.59 2323319.07 3.00
AC504 AC504 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189341.07 2323327.84 3.00
AC505 AC505 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189336.28 2323381.04 3.00
AC506 AC506 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189300.46 2323365.90 3.00
AC507 AC507 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6189303.12 2323364.54 3.00
AC508 AC508 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188019.52 2323849.63 3.00
AC509 AC509 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188024.73 2323859.35 3.00
AC510 AC510 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188052.16 2323915.95 3.00
AC511 AC511 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188057.37 2323926.71 3.00
AC512 AC512 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188169.52 2323873.93 3.00
AC513 AC513 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188163.97 2323861.08 3.00
AC514 AC514 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188137.58 2323806.92 3.00
AC515 AC515 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188131.68 2323793.72 3.00
AC516 AC516 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188179.25 2323855.88 3.00
AC517 AC517 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188296.61 2323813.86 3.00
AC518 AC518 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188146.61 2323789.56 3.00
AC519 AC519 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188264.66 2323746.85 3.00
AC520 AC520 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188184.45 2323866.64 3.00
AC521 AC521 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188151.81 2323799.28 3.00
AC522 AC522 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188291.05 2323801.01 3.00
AC523 AC523 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188258.76 2323733.65 3.00
AC524 AC524 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188277.16 2323739.56 3.00
AC525 AC525 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188304.59 2323796.15 3.00
AC526 AC526 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188309.80 2323806.92 3.00
AC527 AC527 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188384.11 2323673.93 3.00
AC528 AC528 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188421.95 2323754.14 3.00
AC529 AC529 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188271.95 2323729.83 3.00
AC530 AC530 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188390.01 2323687.13 3.00
AC531 AC531 76.0 76.0 76.0 Lw 76 675.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188416.40 2323741.29 3.00
DWY1 DWY1 73.4 73.4 73.4 Lw 73.4 900.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188169.39 2323972.37 3.00
DWY2 DWY2 73.4 73.4 73.4 Lw 73.4 900.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188183.27 2324314.38 3.00
DWY3 DWY3 73.4 73.4 73.4 Lw 73.4 900.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188936.75 2323639.04 3.00
DWY4 DWY4 73.4 73.4 73.4 Lw 73.4 900.00 0.00 270.00 3.00 a 6188617.30 2324139.04 3.00
Urban Crossroads, Inc.188
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
APPENDIX 11.1:
CONSTRUCTION NOISE MODEL
189
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
This page intentionally left blank
190
14713 - Southridge Fontana
CadnaA Noise Prediction Model: 14713-02_Construction.cna
Date: 25.08.22
Analyst: B. Maddux
Calculation Configuration
Configuration
Parameter Value
General
Max. Error (dB)0.00
Max. Search Radius (#(Unit,LEN))2000.01
Min. Dist Src to Rcvr 0.00
Partition
Raster Factor 0.50
Max. Length of Section (#(Unit,LEN))999.99
Min. Length of Section (#(Unit,LEN))1.01
Min. Length of Section (%)0.00
Proj. Line Sources On
Proj. Area Sources On
Ref. Time
Reference Time Day (min)960.00
Reference Time Night (min)480.00
Daytime Penalty (dB)0.00
Recr. Time Penalty (dB)5.00
Night-time Penalty (dB)10.00
DTM
Standard Height (m)0.00
Model of Terrain Triangulation
Reflection
max. Order of Reflection 2
Search Radius Src 100.00
Search Radius Rcvr 100.00
Max. Distance Source - Rcvr 1000.00 1000.00
Min. Distance Rvcr - Reflector 1.00 1.00
Min. Distance Source - Reflector 0.10
Industrial (ISO 9613)
Lateral Diffraction some Obj
Obst. within Area Src do not shield On
Screening Incl. Ground Att. over Barrier
Dz with limit (20/25)
Barrier Coefficients C1,2,3 3.0 20.0 0.0
Temperature (#(Unit,TEMP))10
rel. Humidity (%)70
Ground Absorption G 0.50
Wind Speed for Dir. (#(Unit,SPEED))3.0
Roads (TNM)
Railways (FTA/FRA)
Aircraft (???)
Strictly acc. to AzB
Receiver Noise Levels
Name M.ID Level Lr Limit. Value Land Use Height Coordinates
Day Night CNEL Day Night CNEL Type Auto Noise Type X Y Z
(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)
R1 R1 60.9 -43.9 57.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 5.00 a 6188540.10 2325712.13 5.00
R2 R2 48.8 -56.0 45.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 5.00 a 6191279.80 2325040.72 5.00
R3 R3 56.5 -48.3 53.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 5.00 a 6189839.91 2323229.61 5.00
R4 R4 67.1 -37.7 64.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 5.00 a 6188805.03 2323412.85 5.00
R5 R5 65.8 -38.9 62.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 5.00 a 6188275.09 2323642.02 5.00
R6 R6 65.2 -39.6 62.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 5.00 a 6187797.03 2323892.34 5.00
R7 R7 63.2 -41.6 60.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 5.00 a 6188180.22 2325192.42 5.00
Area Source(s)
Name M.ID Result. PWL Result. PWL''Lw / Li Operating Time Height
Day Evening Night Day Evening Night Type Value norm.Day Special Night (ft)
(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)dB(A)(min)(min)(min)
ConstructionActivity ConstructionActivity001 120.4 15.6 15.6 68.6 -36.1 -36.1 PWL-Pt 115.6 8 a
Name Height Coordinates
Begin End x y z Ground
(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)
ConstructionActivity 8.00 a 6188480.75 2325650.05 8.00 0.00
6188570.19 2325616.28 8.00 0.00
6188618.22 2325606.67 8.00 0.00
6188697.01 2325602.80 8.00 0.00
6188787.41 2325616.35 8.00 0.00
6188777.70 2325603.18 8.00 0.00
Urban Crossroads, Inc.191
Name Height Coordinates
Begin End x y z Ground
(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)
6188724.31 2325597.65 8.00 0.00
6188654.94 2325519.02 8.00 0.00
6188594.89 2325494.97 8.00 0.00
6188534.24 2325389.24 8.00 0.00
6188505.79 2325319.89 8.00 0.00
6188478.08 2325219.76 8.00 0.00
6188466.16 2325138.68 8.00 0.00
6188463.13 2325059.14 8.00 0.00
6188468.95 2324976.40 8.00 0.00
6188484.12 2324893.84 8.00 0.00
6188510.50 2324807.86 8.00 0.00
6188558.77 2324707.79 8.00 0.00
6188584.86 2324676.22 8.00 0.00
6188636.59 2324635.54 8.00 0.00
6188695.22 2324610.31 8.00 0.00
6188757.33 2324600.76 8.00 0.00
6188986.68 2324319.29 8.00 0.00
6189023.98 2324234.23 8.00 0.00
6189066.93 2324224.84 8.00 0.00
6189099.27 2324134.81 8.00 0.00
6189085.31 2324097.81 8.00 0.00
6189135.18 2324039.10 8.00 0.00
6189137.09 2324007.10 8.00 0.00
6189171.31 2323980.21 8.00 0.00
6189191.20 2323885.33 8.00 0.00
6189245.45 2323807.65 8.00 0.00
6189274.62 2323794.41 8.00 0.00
6189335.68 2323665.96 8.00 0.00
6189357.32 2323673.48 8.00 0.00
6189314.45 2323581.56 8.00 0.00
6189301.51 2323587.32 8.00 0.00
6189300.50 2323534.11 8.00 0.00
6189351.48 2323479.30 8.00 0.00
6189333.79 2323460.77 8.00 0.00
6189364.14 2323370.95 8.00 0.00
6189480.41 2323299.72 8.00 0.00
6189488.74 2323224.73 8.00 0.00
6189241.20 2323227.20 8.00 0.00
6187793.13 2323920.99 8.00 0.00
6188142.49 2324919.91 8.00 0.00
6188266.66 2325166.23 8.00 0.00
6188384.08 2325435.00 8.00 0.00
Urban Crossroads, Inc.192
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
APPENDIX 11.2:
ROCK CRUSHER NOISE MODEL
193
Southridge Fontana Noise Impact Analysis
14713-06 Noise Study
This page intentionally left blank
194
14713 - Southridge Fontana - Rock Crusher
CadnaA Noise Prediction Model: 14713-02_Rock_Crushing.cna
Date: 06.09.22
Analyst: B. Maddux
Calculation Configuration
Configuration
Parameter Value
General
Max. Error (dB)0.00
Max. Search Radius (#(Unit,LEN))2000.01
Min. Dist Src to Rcvr 0.00
Partition
Raster Factor 0.50
Max. Length of Section (#(Unit,LEN))999.99
Min. Length of Section (#(Unit,LEN))1.01
Min. Length of Section (%)0.00
Proj. Line Sources On
Proj. Area Sources On
Ref. Time
Reference Time Day (min)960.00
Reference Time Night (min)480.00
Daytime Penalty (dB)0.00
Recr. Time Penalty (dB)5.00
Night-time Penalty (dB)10.00
DTM
Standard Height (m)0.00
Model of Terrain Triangulation
Reflection
max. Order of Reflection 2
Search Radius Src 100.00
Search Radius Rcvr 100.00
Max. Distance Source - Rcvr 1000.00 1000.00
Min. Distance Rvcr - Reflector 1.00 1.00
Min. Distance Source - Reflector 0.10
Industrial (ISO 9613)
Lateral Diffraction some Obj
Obst. within Area Src do not shield On
Screening Incl. Ground Att. over Barrier
Dz with limit (20/25)
Barrier Coefficients C1,2,3 3.0 20.0 0.0
Temperature (#(Unit,TEMP))10
rel. Humidity (%)70
Ground Absorption G 0.50
Wind Speed for Dir. (#(Unit,SPEED))3.0
Roads (TNM)
Railways (FTA/FRA)
Aircraft (???)
Strictly acc. to AzB
Receiver Noise Levels
Name M.ID Level Lr Limit. Value Land Use Height Coordinates
Day Night CNEL Day Night CNEL Type Auto Noise Type X Y Z
(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)
R1 R1 51.0 51.0 57.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 5.00 a 6188540.10 2325712.13 5.00
R2 R2 44.8 44.8 51.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 5.00 a 6191279.80 2325040.72 5.00
R3 R3 49.6 49.6 56.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 5.00 a 6189839.91 2323229.61 5.00
R4 R4 54.0 54.0 60.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 5.00 a 6188805.03 2323412.85 5.00
R5 R5 54.5 54.5 61.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 5.00 a 6188275.09 2323642.02 5.00
R6 R6 52.7 52.7 59.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 5.00 a 6187797.03 2323892.34 5.00
R7 R7 53.7 53.7 60.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 5.00 a 6188180.22 2325192.42 5.00
Area Source(s)
Name M.ID Result. PWL Result. PWL''Lw / Li Operating Time Height
Day Evening Night Day Evening Night Type Value norm.Day Special Night (ft)
(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)dB(A)(min)(min)(min)
Rock Crusher RockCrusher001 121.6 121.6 121.6 83.8 83.8 83.8 Lw 121.6 0.a
Name Height Coordinates
Begin End x y z Ground
(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)
Rock Crusher 0.00 a 6188750.66 2324562.84 0.00 0.00
6188819.24 2324516.83 0.00 0.00
6188972.89 2324328.47 0.00 0.00
6188951.19 2324255.55 0.00 0.00
6188940.77 2324250.34 0.00 0.00
6188861.78 2324222.56 0.00 0.00
Urban Crossroads, Inc.195
Name Height Coordinates
Begin End x y z Ground
(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)
6188785.39 2324269.44 0.00 0.00
6188694.24 2324365.79 0.00 0.00
6188638.69 2324469.09 0.00 0.00
6188671.67 2324549.82 0.00 0.00
Urban Crossroads, Inc.196