HomeMy WebLinkAboutAppendix E - Energy Analysis Report
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue
Warehouse
ENERGY ANALYSIS
CITY OF FONTANA
PREPARED BY:
Haseeb Qureshi
hqureshi@urbanxroads.com
Ali Dadabhoy
adadabhoy@urbanxroads.com
DECEMBER 2, 2022
14581-02 EA Report
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................. I
APPENDICES ......................................................................................................................................... II
LIST OF EXHIBITS .................................................................................................................................. II
LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................... II
LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS ............................................................................................................. III
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 1
ES.1 Summary of Findings ..................................................................................................................... 1
ES.2 Project Requirements ................................................................................................................... 1
1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 3
1.1 Site Location .................................................................................................................................. 3
1.2 Project Description ........................................................................................................................ 3
2 EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................ 7
2.1 Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 7
2.2 Electricity ....................................................................................................................................... 9
2.3 Natural Gas ................................................................................................................................. 11
2.4 Transportation Energy Resources ............................................................................................... 14
3 REGULATORY BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................... 17
3.1 Federal Regulations ..................................................................................................................... 17
3.2 California Regulations ................................................................................................................. 17
4 PROJECT ENERGY DEMANDS AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY MEASURES ........................................... 23
4.1 Evaluation Criteria ....................................................................................................................... 23
4.2 Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 23
4.3 Construction Energy Demands ................................................................................................... 24
4.4 Operational Energy Demands ..................................................................................................... 32
4.5 Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 33
5 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................................... 37
6 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................. 40
7 CERTIFICATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 43
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
ii
APPENDICES
APPENDIX 4.1: CALEEMOD CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS
APPENDIX 4.2: EMFAC2021
LIST OF EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT 1-A: LOCATION MAP .............................................................................................................. 4
EXHIBIT 1-B: SITE PLAN........................................................................................................................ 5
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE ES-1: SUMMARY OF CEQA SIGNIFICANCE FINDINGS .................................................................. 1
TABLE 2-1: TOTAL ELECRICITY SYSTEM POWER (CALIFORNIA 2020) ...................................................... 8
TABLE 2-2: SCE 2021 POWER CONTENT MIX ....................................................................................... 11
TABLE 4-1: CONSTRUCTION DURATION .............................................................................................. 24
TABLE 4-2: CONSTRUCTION POWER COST .......................................................................................... 25
TABLE 4-3: CONSTRUCTION ELECTRICITY USAGE ................................................................................ 25
TABLE 4-4: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ASSUMPTIONS .................................................................... 26
TABLE 4-5: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES ........................................ 27
TABLE 4-6: CONSTRUCTION TRIPS AND VMT ...................................................................................... 28
TABLE 4-7: CONSTRUCTION WORKER FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES ............................................. 29
TABLE 4-8: CONSTRUCTION VENDOR FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES (1 OF 3) ................................. 30
TABLE 4-9: TOTAL PROJECT-GENERATED TRAFFIC ANNUAL FUEL CONSUMPTION ............................... 32
TABLE 4-10: PROJECT ANNUAL OPERATIONAL NATURAL GAS DEMAND SUMMARY ........................... 33
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
iii
LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS
% Percent
(1) Reference
AGSP Airport Gateway Specific Plan
AQIA Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Air Quality
Impact Analysis
BACM Best Available Control Measures
BTU British Thermal Units
CalEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model
CAPCOA California Air Pollution Control Officers Association
CARB California Air Resources Board
CCR California Code of Regulations
CEC California Energy Commission
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
City City of Fontana
CPEP Clean Power and Electrification Pathway
CPUC California Public Utilities Commission
DMV Department of Motor Vehicles
EIA Energy Information Administration
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
EMFAC EMissions FACtor
FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
GHG Greenhouse Gas
GWh Gigawatt Hour
HHDT Heavy-Heavy Duty Trucks
hp-hr-gal Horsepower Hours Per Gallon
IEPR Integrated Energy Policy Report
ISO Independent Service Operator
ISTEA Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act
ITE Institute of Transportation Engineers
kBTU Thousand-British Thermal Units
kWh Kilowatt Hour
LDA Light Duty Auto
LDT1/LDT2 Light-Duty Trucks
LHDT1/LHDT2 Light-Heavy Duty Trucks
MARB/IPA March Air Reserve Base/Inland Port Airport
MDV Medium Duty Trucks
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
iv
MHDT Medium-Heavy Duty Trucks
MMcfd Million Cubic Feet Per Day
mpg Miles Per Gallon
MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization
PG&E Pacific Gas and Electric
Project Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse
PV Photovoltaic
SCAB South Coast Air Basin
SCE Southern California Edison
SDAB San Diego Air Basin
sf Square Feet
SoCalGas Southern California Gas
TEA-21 Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
TRUs Transportation Refrigeration Units
U.S. United States
VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
v
This page intentionally left blank
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ES.1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
The results of this Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis is summarized
below based on the significance criteria in Section 5 of this report consistent with Appendix G of
the 2020 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Statute and Guidelines (CEQA Guidelines)
(1). Table ES-1 shows the findings of significance for potential energy impacts under CEQA.
TABLE ES-1: SUMMARY OF CEQA SIGNIFICANCE FINDINGS
Analysis Report
Section
Significance Findings
Unmitigated Mitigated
Energy Impact #1: Would the Project result in
potentially significant environmental impact due
to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary
consumption of energy resources, during project
construction or operation?
5.0 Less Than Significant n/a
Energy Impact #2: Would the Project conflict
with or obstruct a state or local plan for
renewable energy or energy efficiency?
5.0 Less Than Significant n/a
ES.2 PROJECT REQUIREMENTS
The Project would be required to comply with regulations imposed by the federal and state
agencies that regulate energy use and consumption through various means and programs. Those
that are directly and indirectly applicable to the Project and that would assist in the reduction of
energy usage include:
• Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA)
• The Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21
• Integrated Energy Policy Report (IEPR)
• State of California Energy Plan
• California Code Title 24, Part 6, Energy Efficiency Standards
• California Code Title 24, Part 11, California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen)
• AB 1493 Pavley Regulations and Fuel Efficiency Standards
• California’s Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS)
• Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act of 2015 (SB 350)
Consistency with the above regulations is discussed in detail in section 5 of this report.
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
2
This page intentionally left blank
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report 3
1 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of the energy analysis prepared by Urban Crossroads, Inc., for
the proposed Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Project (Project). The purpose of this
report is to ensure that energy implication is considered by the City of Fontana (Lead Agency), as
the lead agency, and to quantify anticipated energy usage associated with construction and
operation of the proposed Project, determine if the usage amounts are efficient, typical, or
wasteful for the land use type, and to emphasize avoiding or reducing inefficient, wasteful, and
unnecessary consumption of energy.
1.1 SITE LOCATION
The proposed project is located north of Santa Ana Avenue and on either side of Oleander Avenue
as well as the northeast corner of Citrus Avenue at Santa Ana Avenue in the City of Fontana as
shown on Exhibit 1-A.
1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed Project is to consist of the development of 540,849 square feet of warehouse use
between 3 warehouse buildings:
• Warehouse building 1: 151,618 square feet
• Warehouse building 2: 196,336 square feet
• Warehouse building 3: 192,895 square feet
The Project is anticipated to be constructed by the year 2025. The preliminary site plan for the
proposed Project is shown on Exhibit 1-B.
This analysis is intended to describe energy usage associated with the expected operational
activities at the Project site. This report assumes the Project will operate 24-hours daily for seven
days per week.
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
4
EXHIBIT 1-A: LOCATION MAP
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
5
EXHIBIT 1-B: SITE PLAN
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
6
This page intentionally left blank
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
7
2 EXISTING CONDITIONS
This section provides an overview of the existing energy conditions in the Project region.
2.1 OVERVIEW
The most recent data for California’s estimated total energy consumption and natural gas
consumption is from 2019, released by the United States (U.S.) Energy Information
Administration’s (EIA) California State Profile and Energy Estimates in 2021 and included (2):
• As of 2019, approximately 7,802 trillion British Thermal Unit (BTU) of energy was consumed
• As of 2019, approximately 662 million barrels of petroleum
• As of 2019, approximately 2,144 billion cubic feet of natural gas
• As of 2019, approximately 1 million short tons of coal
The California Energy Commission’s (CEC) Transportation Energy Demand Forecast 2018-2030
was released in order to support the 2017 Integrated Energy Policy Report. The Transportation
energy Demand Forecast 2018-2030 lays out graphs and data supporting their projections of
California’s future transportation energy demand. The projected inputs consider expected
variable changes in fuel prices, income, population, and other variables. Predictions regarding
fuel demand included:
• Gasoline demand in the transportation sector is expected to decline from approximately 15.8
billion gallons in 2017 to between 12.3 billion and 12.7 billion gallons in 2030 (3)
• Diesel demand in the transportation sector is expected to rise, increasing from approximately 3.7
billion diesel gallons in 2015 to approximately 4.7 billion in 2030 (3)
• Data from the Department of Energy states that approximately 3.9 billion gallons of diesel fuel
were consumed in 2019 (4)
The most recent data provided by the EIA for energy use in California by demand sector is from
2019 and is reported as follows:
• Approximately 39.4% transportation;
• Approximately 23.1% industrial;
• Approximately 18.7% residential; and
• Approximately 18.8% commercial (5)
In 2020, total system electric generation for California was 272,576 gigawatt hours (GWh).
California's massive electricity in-state generation system generated approximately 190,913
GWh which accounted for approximately 70% of the electricity it uses; the rest was imported
from the Pacific Northwest (15%) and the U.S. Southwest (15%) (6). Natural gas is the main source
for electricity generation at 42.97% of the total in-state electric generation system power as
shown in Table 2-1.
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
8
TABLE 2-1: TOTAL ELECRICITY SYSTEM POWER (CALIFORNIA 2020)
Fuel Type California In-State
Generation (GWh)
Percent of
California In-State
Generation
Northwest
Imports
(GWh)
Southwest
Imports
(GWh)
Total
Imports
(GWh)
Percent
of
Imports
Total
California
Energy
Mix ()
Total
California
Power Mix
Coal 317 0.17% 194 6,963 7,157 8.76% 7,474 2.74%
Natural Gas 92,298 48.35% 70 8,654 8,724 10.68% 101,022 37.06%
Oil 30 0.02% - - 0 0.00% 30 0.01%
Other
(Waste Heat/Petroleum Coke) 384 0.20% 125 9 134 0.16% 518 0.19%
Nuclear 16,280 8.53% 672 8,481 9,154 11.21% 25,434 9.33%
Large Hydro 17,938 9.40% 14,078 1,259 15,337 18.78% 33,275 12.21%
Unspecified - 0.00% 12,870 1,745 14,615 17.90% 14,615 5.36%
Non-Renewable and
Unspecified Totals 127,248 66.65% 28,009 27,111 55,120 67.50% 182,368 66.91%
Biomass 5,680 2.97% 975 25 1,000 1.22% 6,679 2.45%
Geothermal 11,345 5.94% 166 1,825 1,991 2.44% 13,336 4.89%
Small Hydro 3,476 1.82% 320 2 322 0.39% 3,798 1.39%
Solar 29,456 15.43% 284 6,312 6,596 8.08% 36,052 13.23%
Wind 13,708 7.18% 11,438 5,197 16,635 20.37% 30,343 11.13%
Renewable Totals 63,665 33.35% 13,184 13,359 26,543 32.50% 90,208 33.09%
System Totals 190,913 100.00% 41,193 40,471 81,663 100.00% 272,576 100.00%
Source: California Energy Commission’s 2020 Total System Electric Generation
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
9
An updated summary of, and context for energy consumption and energy demands within the
State is presented in “U.S. Energy Information Administration, California State Profile and Energy
Estimates, Quick Facts” excerpted below (7):
• California was the seventh-largest producer of crude oil among the 50 states in 2019, and, as of
January 2020, it ranked third in oil refining capacity. Foreign suppliers, led by Saudi Arabia, Iraq,
Ecuador, and Colombia, provided more than half of the crude oil refined in California in 2019.
• California is the largest consumer of both jet fuel and motor gasoline among the 50 states and
accounted for 17% of the nation’s jet fuel consumption and 11% of motor gasoline consumption
in 2019. The state is the second-largest consumer of all petroleum products combined, accounting
for 10% of the U.S. total. In 2018, California’s energy consumption was the second highest among
the states, but its per capita energy consumption was the fourth-lowest due in part to its mild
climate and its energy efficiency programs.
• In 2019, California was the nation’s top producer of electricity from solar, geothermal, and
biomass energy and the state was second in the nation in conventional hydroelectric power
generation.
• In 2019, California was the fourth largest electricity producer in the nation, but the state was also
the nation’s largest importer of electricity and received about 28% of its electricity supply from
generating facilities outside of California, including imports from Mexico.
As indicated above, California is one of the nation’s leading energy-producing states, and
California’s per capita energy use is among the nation’s most efficient. Given the nature of the
Project, the remainder of this discussion will focus on the three sources of energy that are most
relevant to the project—namely, electricity, natural gas, and transportation fuel for vehicle trips
associated with the uses planned for the Project.
2.2 ELECTRICITY
The usage associated with electricity use were calculated using the California Emissions Estimator
Model (CalEEMod) Version 2022.1. The Southern California region’s electricity reliability has been
of concern for the past several years due to the planned retirement of aging facilities that depend
upon once-through cooling technologies, as well as the June 2013 retirement of the San Onofre
Nuclear Generating Station (San Onofre). While the once-through cooling phase-out has been
ongoing since the May 2010 adoption of the State Water Resources Control Board’s once-
through cooling policy, the retirement of San Onofre complicated the situation. California ISO
studies revealed the extent to which the South California Air Basin (SCAB) and the San Diego Air
Basin (SDAB) region were vulnerable to low-voltage and post-transient voltage instability
concerns. A preliminary plan to address these issues was detailed in the 2013 Integrative Energy
Policy Report (IEPR) after a collaborative process with other energy agencies, utilities, and air
districts (8). Similarly, the subsequent 2021 IEPR’s identify broad strategies that are aimed at
maintaining electricity system reliability.
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
10
Electricity is currently provided to the Project by Southern California Edison (SCE). SCE provides
electric power to more than 15 million persons in 15 counties and in 180 incorporated cities,
within a service area encompassing approximately 50,000 square miles. Based on SCE’s 2018
Power Content Label Mix, SCE derives electricity from varied energy resources including: fossil
fuels, hydroelectric generators, nuclear power plants, geothermal power plants, solar power
generation, and wind farms. SCE also purchases from independent power producers and utilities,
including out-of-state suppliers (9).
California’s electricity industry is an organization of traditional utilities, private generating
companies, and state agencies, each with a variety of roles and responsibilities to ensure that
electrical power is provided to consumers. The California Independent Service Operator (ISO) is
a nonprofit public benefit corporation and is the impartial operator of the State’s wholesale
power grid and is charged with maintaining grid reliability, and to direct uninterrupted electrical
energy supplies to California’s homes and communities. While utilities still own transmission
assets, the ISO routes electrical power along these assets, maximizing the use of the transmission
system and its power generation resources. The ISO matches buyers and sellers of electricity to
ensure that enough power is available to meet demand. To these ends, every five minutes the
ISO forecasts electrical demands, accounts for operating reserves, and assigns the lowest cost
power plant unit to meet demands while ensuring adequate system transmission capacities and
capabilities (10).
Part of the ISO’s charge is to plan and coordinate grid enhancements to ensure that electrical
power is provided to California consumers. To this end, utilities file annual transmission
expansion/modification plans to accommodate the State’s growing electrical needs. The ISO
reviews and either approves or denies the proposed additions. In addition, and perhaps most
importantly, the ISO works with other areas in the western United States electrical grid to ensure
that adequate power supplies are available to the State. In this manner, continuing reliable and
affordable electrical power is assured to existing and new consumers throughout the State.
Tables 2-2 identifies SCE’s specific proportional shares of electricity sources in 2021. As indicated
in Table 2-2, the 2021 SCE Power Mix has renewable energy at 31.4% of the overall energy
resources. Geothermal resources are at 5.7%, wind power is at 10.2%, large hydroelectric sources
are at 2.3%, solar energy is at 14.9%, and coal is at 0% (11).
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
11
TABLE 2-2: SCE 2021 POWER CONTENT MIX
Energy Resources 2021 SCE Power Mix
Eligible Renewable 31.4%
Biomass & Waste 0.1%
Geothermal 5.7%
Eligible Hydroelectric 0.5%
Solar 14.9%
Wind 10.2%
Coal 0.0%
Large Hydroelectric 2.3%
Natural Gas 22.3%
Nuclear 9.2%
Other 0.2%
Unspecified Sources of power* 34.6%
Total 100%
* "Unspecified sources of power" means electricity from transactions that are not
traceable to specific generation sources
2.3 NATURAL GAS
The following summary of natural gas customers and volumes, supplies, delivery of supplies,
storage, service options, and operations is excerpted from information provided by the California
Public Utilities Commission (CPUC).
“The CPUC regulates natural gas utility service for approximately 10.8 million customers
that receive natural gas from Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E), Southern California Gas
(SoCalGas), San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E), Southwest Gas, and several smaller natural
gas utilities. The CPUC also regulates independent storage operators: Lodi Gas Storage,
Wild Goose Storage, Central Valley Storage and Gill Ranch Storage.
California's natural gas utilities provide service to over 11 million gas meters. SoCalGas
and PG&E provide service to about 5.9 million and 4.3 million customers, respectively,
while SDG&E provides service to over 800, 000 customers. In 2018, California gas utilities
forecasted that they would deliver about 4740 million cubic feet per day (MMcfd) of gas
to their customers, on average, under normal weather conditions.
The overwhelming majority of natural gas utility customers in California are residential
and small commercials customers, referred to as "core" customers. Larger volume gas
customers, like electric generators and industrial customers, are called "noncore"
customers. Although very small in number relative to core customers, noncore customers
consume about 65% of the natural gas delivered by the state's natural gas utilities, while
core customers consume about 35%.
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
12
A significant amount of gas (about 19%, or 1131 MMcfd, of the total forecasted California
consumption in 2018) is also directly delivered to some California large volume consumers,
without being transported over the regulated utility pipeline system. Those customers,
referred to as "bypass" customers, take service directly from interstate pipelines or directly
from California producers.
SDG&E and Southwest Gas' southern division are wholesale customers of SoCalGas, i.e.,
they receive deliveries of gas from SoCalGas and in turn deliver that gas to their own
customers. (Southwest Gas also provides natural gas distribution service in the Lake
Tahoe area.) Similarly, West Coast Gas, a small gas utility, is a wholesale customer of
PG&E. Some other wholesale customers are municipalities like the cities of Palo Alto, Long
Beach, and Vernon, which are not regulated by the CPUC.
Natural gas from out-of-state production basins is delivered into California via the
interstate natural gas pipeline system. The major interstate pipelines that deliver out-of-
state natural gas to California gas utilities are Gas Transmission Northwest Pipeline, Kern
River Pipeline, Transwestern Pipeline, El Paso Pipeline, Ruby Pipeline, Mojave Pipeline, and
Tuscarora. Another pipeline, the North Baja - Baja Norte Pipeline takes gas off the El
Paso Pipeline at the California/Arizona border and delivers that gas through California into
Mexico. While the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) regulates the
transportation of natural gas on the interstate pipelines, and authorizes rates for that
service, the California Public Utilities Commission may participate in FERC regulatory
proceedings to represent the interests of California natural gas consumers.
The gas transported to California gas utilities via the interstate pipelines, as well as some
of the California-produced gas, is delivered into the PG&E and SoCalGas intrastate natural
gas transmission pipelines systems (commonly referred to as California's "backbone"
pipeline system). Natural gas on the utilities' backbone pipeline systems is then delivered
to the local transmission and distribution pipeline systems, or to natural gas storage
fields. Some large volume noncore customers take natural gas delivery directly off the
high-pressure backbone and local transmission pipeline systems, while core customers
and other noncore customers take delivery off the utilities' distribution pipeline
systems. The state's natural gas utilities operate over 100,000 miles of transmission and
distribution pipelines, and thousands more miles of service lines.
Bypass customers take most of their deliveries directly off the Kern/Mojave pipeline
system, but they also take a significant amount of gas from California production.
PG&E and SoCalGas own and operate several natural gas storage fields that are located
within their service territories in northern and southern California, respectively. These
storage fields, and four independently owned storage utilities - Lodi Gas Storage, Wild
Goose Storage, Central Valley Storage, and Gill Ranch Storage - help meet peak seasonal
and daily natural gas demand and allow California natural gas customers to secure
natural gas supplies more efficiently. PG&E is a 25% owner of the Gill Ranch Storage field.
These storage fields provide a significant amount of infrastructure capacity to help meet
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
13
California's natural gas requirements, and without these storage fields, California would
need much more pipeline capacity in order to meet peak gas requirements.
Prior to the late 1980s, California regulated utilities provided virtually all natural gas
services to all their customers. Since then, the Commission has gradually restructured the
California gas industry in order to give customers more options while assuring regulatory
protections for those customers that wish to, or are required to, continue receiving utility-
provided services.
The option to purchase natural gas from independent suppliers is one of the results of this
restructuring process. Although the regulated utilities procure natural gas supplies for
most core customers, core customers have the option to purchase natural gas from
independent natural gas marketers, called "core transport agents" (CTA). Contact
information for core transport agents can be found on the utilities' web sites. Noncore
customers, on the other hand, make natural gas supply arrangements directly with
producers or with marketers.
Another option resulting from the restructuring process occurred in 1993, when the
Commission removed the utilities' storage service responsibility for noncore customers,
along with the cost of this service from noncore customers' transportation rates. The
Commission also encouraged the development of independent storage fields, and in
subsequent years, all the independent storage fields in California were
established. Noncore customers and marketers may now take storage service from the
utility or from an independent storage provider (if available), and pay for that service, or
may opt to take no storage service at all. For core customers, the Commission assures that
the utility has adequate storage capacity set aside to meet core requirements, and core
customers pay for that service.
In a 1997 decision, the Commission adopted PG&E's "Gas Accord", which unbundled
PG&E's backbone transmission costs from noncore transportation rates. This decision
gave customers and marketers the opportunity to obtain pipeline capacity rights on
PG&E's backbone transmission pipeline system, if desired, and pay for that service at rates
authorized by the Commission. The Gas Accord also required PG&E to set aside a certain
amount of backbone transmission capacity in order to deliver gas to its core
customers. Subsequent Commission decisions modified and extended the initial terms of
the Gas Accord. The "Gas Accord" framework is still in place today for PG&E's backbone
and storage rates and services and is now simply referred to as PG&E Gas Transmission
and Storage (GT&S).
In a 2006 decision, the Commission adopted a similar gas transmission framework for
Southern California, called the "firm access rights" system. SoCalGas and SDG&E
implemented the firm access rights (FAR) system in 2008, and it is now referred to as the
backbone transmission system (BTS) framework. As under the PG&E backbone
transmission system, SoCalGas backbone transmission costs are unbundled from noncore
transportation rates. Noncore customers and marketers may obtain, and pay for, firm
backbone transmission capacity at various receipt points on the SoCalGas system. A
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
14
certain amount of backbone transmission capacity is obtained for core customers to
assure meeting their requirements.
Many if not most noncore customers now use a marketer to provide for several of the
services formerly provided by the utility. That is, a noncore customer may simply arrange
for a marketer to procure its supplies, and obtain any needed storage and backbone
transmission capacity, in order to assure that it will receive its needed deliveries of natural
gas supplies. Core customers still mainly rely on the utilities for procurement service, but
they have the option to take procurement service from a CTA. Backbone transmission and
storage capacity is either set aside or obtained for core customers in amounts to assure
very high levels of service.
In order properly operate their natural gas transmission pipeline and storage systems,
PG&E and SoCalGas must balance the amount of gas received into the pipeline system and
delivered to customers or to storage fields. Some of these utilities’ storage capacity is
dedicated to this service, and under most circumstances, customers do not need to
precisely match their deliveries with their consumption. However, when too much or too
little gas is expected to be delivered into the utilities’ systems, relative to the amount being
consumed, the utilities require customers to more precisely match up their deliveries with
their consumption. And, if customers do not meet certain delivery requirements, they
could face financial penalties. The utilities do not profit from these financial penalties -
the amounts are then returned to customers as a whole. If the utilities find that they are
unable to deliver all the gas that is expected to be consumed, they may even call for a
curtailment of some gas deliveries. These curtailments are typically required for just the
largest, noncore customers. It has been many years since there has been a significant
curtailment of core customers in California.” (12)
As indicated in the preceding discussions, natural gas is available from a variety of in-state and
out-of-state sources and is provided throughout the state in response to market supply and
demand. Complementing available natural gas resources, biogas may soon be available via
existing delivery systems, thereby increasing the availability and reliability of resources in total.
The CPUC oversees utility purchases and transmission of natural gas to ensure reliable and
affordable natural gas deliveries to existing and new consumers throughout the State.
2.4 TRANSPORTATION ENERGY RESOURCES
The Project would generate additional vehicle trips with resulting consumption of energy
resources, predominantly gasoline and diesel fuel. The Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV)
identified 36.2 million registered vehicles in California (13), and those vehicles consume an
estimated 17.2 billion gallons of fuel each year1. Gasoline (and other vehicle fuels) are
commercially provided commodities and would be available to the Project patrons and
employees via commercial outlets.
1 Fuel consumptions estimated utilizing information from EMFAC2021.
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
15
California’s on-road transportation system includes 396,616 lane miles, more than 26.6 million
passenger vehicles and light trucks, and almost 9.0 million medium- and heavy-duty vehicles (13).
While gasoline consumption has been declining since 2008 it is still by far the dominant fuel.
California is the second-largest consumer of petroleum products, after Texas, and accounts for
10% of the nation's total consumption. The state is the largest U.S. consumer of motor gasoline
and jet fuel, and 85% of the petroleum consumed in California is used in the transportation sector
(14).
California accounts for less than 1% of total U.S. natural gas reserves and production. As with
crude oil, California's natural gas production has experienced a gradual decline since 1985. In
2019, about 37% of the natural gas delivered to consumers went to the state's industrial sector,
and about 28% was delivered to the electric power sector. Natural gas fueled more than two-
fifths of the state's utility-scale electricity generation in 2019. The residential sector, where two-
thirds of California households use natural gas for home heating, accounted for 22% of natural
gas deliveries. The commercial sector received 12% of the deliveries to end users and the
transportation sector consumed the remaining 1% (14).
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
16
This page intentionally left blank
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
17
3 REGULATORY BACKGROUND
Federal and state agencies regulate energy use and consumption through various means and
programs. On the federal level, the United States Department of Transportation, the United
States Department of Energy, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are
three federal agencies with substantial influence over energy policies and programs. On the state
level, the CPUC and the CEC are two agencies with authority over different aspects of energy.
Relevant federal and state energy-related laws and plans are summarized below.
3.1 FEDERAL REGULATIONS
3.1.1 INTERMODAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY ACT OF 1991 (ISTEA)
The ISTEA promoted the development of inter-modal transportation systems to maximize
mobility as well as address national and local interests in air quality and energy. ISTEA contained
factors that Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) were to address in developing
transportation plans and programs, including some energy-related factors. To meet the new
ISTEA requirements, MPOs adopted explicit policies defining the social, economic, energy, and
environmental values guiding transportation decisions.
3.1.2 THE TRANSPORTATION EQUITY ACT FOR THE 21ST CENTURY (TEA-21)
The TEA-21 was signed into law in 1998 and builds upon the initiatives established in the ISTEA
legislation, discussed above. TEA-21 authorizes highway, highway safety, transit, and other
efficient surface transportation programs. TEA-21 continues the program structure established
for highways and transit under ISTEA, such as flexibility in the use of funds, emphasis on measures
to improve the environment, and focus on a strong planning process as the foundation of good
transportation decisions. TEA-21 also provides for investment in research and its application to
maximize the performance of the transportation system through, for example, deployment of
Intelligent Transportation Systems, to help improve operations and management of
transportation systems and vehicle safety.
3.2 CALIFORNIA REGULATIONS
3.2.1 INTEGRATED ENERGY POLICY REPORT (IEPR)
Senate Bill 1389 (Bowen, Chapter 568, Statutes of 2002) requires the CEC to prepare a biennial
integrated energy policy report that assesses major energy trends and issues facing the state’s
electricity, natural gas, and transportation fuel sectors and provides policy recommendations to
conserve resources; protect the environment; ensure reliable, secure, and diverse energy
supplies; enhance the state’s economy; and protect public health and safety (Public Resources
Code § 25301[a]). The CEC prepares these assessments and associated policy recommendations
every two years, with updates in alternate years, as part of the Integrated Energy Policy Report.
The 2021 IEPR was adopted February 22, 2022, and continues to work towards improving
electricity, natural gas, and transportation fuel energy use in California. The 2021 IEPR provides
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
18
the results of the CEC’s assessments of a variety of energy issues facing California. Many of these
issues will require action if the state is to meet its climate, energy, air quality, and other
environmental goals while maintaining reliability and controlling costs. (15).
3.2.2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY PLAN
The CEC is responsible for preparing the State Energy Plan, which identifies emerging trends
related to energy supply, demand, conservation, public health and safety, and the maintenance
of a healthy economy. The Plan calls for the state to assist in the transformation of the
transportation system to improve air quality, reduce congestion, and increase the efficient use
of fuel supplies with the least environmental and energy costs. To further this policy, the plan
identifies several strategies, including assistance to public agencies and fleet operators and
encouragement of urban designs that reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and accommodate
pedestrian and bicycle access.
3.2.3 CALIFORNIA CODE TITLE 24, PART 6, ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS
California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24 Part 6: The California Energy Code was first
adopted in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California’s energy consumption.
The standards are updated periodically to allow consideration and possible incorporation of
new energy efficient technologies and methods. CCR, Title 24, Part 11: California Green
Building Standards Code (CALGreen) is a comprehensive and uniform regulatory code for all
residential, commercial, and school buildings that went in effect on August 1, 2009, and is
administered by the California Building Standards Commission.
CALGreen is updated on a regular basis, with the most recent approved update consisting of the
2022 California Green Building Code Standards that will be effective on January 1, 2023. The CEC
anticipates that the 2022 energy code will provide $1.5 billion in consumer benefits and reduce
GHG emissions by 10 million metric tons (16). The Project would be required to comply with the
applicable standards in place at the time building permit document submittals are made. These
require, among other items (17):
NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES
• Short-term bicycle parking. If the new project or an additional alteration is anticipated to
generate visitor traffic, provide permanently anchored bicycle racks within 200 feet of the
visitors’ entrance, readily visible to passers-by, for 5% of new visitor motorized vehicle
parking spaces being added, with a minimum of one two-bike capacity rack
(5.106.4.1.1).
• Long-term bicycle parking. For new buildings with tenant spaces that have 10 or more
tenant-occupants, provide secure bicycle parking for 5% of the tenant-occupant vehicular
parking spaces with a minimum of one bicycle parking facility (5.106.4.1.2).
• Designated parking for clean air vehicles. In new projects or additions to alterations that
add 10 or more vehicular parking spaces, provide designated parking for any combination of
low-emitting, fuel-efficient and carpool/van pool vehicles as shown in Table 5.106.5.2 (5.106.5.2).
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
19
• EV charging stations. New construction shall facilitate the future installation of EV supply
equipment. The compliance requires empty raceways for future conduit and documentation that
the electrical system has adequate capacity for the future load. The number of spaces to be
provided for is contained in Table 5.106. 5.3.3 (5.106.5.3). Additionally, Table 5.106.5.4.1
specifies requirements for the installation of raceway conduit and panel power requirements for
medium- and heavy-duty electric vehicle supply equipment for warehouses, grocery stores, and
retail stores.
• Outdoor light pollution reduction. Outdoor lighting systems shall be designed to meet the
backlight, uplight and glare ratings per Table 5.106.8 (5.106.8).
• Construction waste management. Recycle and/or salvage for reuse a minimum of 65% of
the nonhazardous construction and demolition waste in accordance with Section
5.408.1.1. 5.405.1.2, or 5.408.1.3; or meet a local construction and demolition waste
management ordinance, whichever is more stringent (5.408.1).
• Excavated soil and land clearing debris. 100% of trees, stumps, rocks and associated
vegetation and soils resulting primarily from land clearing shall be reuse or recycled. For a
phased project, such material may be stockpiled on site until the storage site is developed
(5.408.3).
• Recycling by Occupants. Provide readily accessible areas that serve the entire building and are
identified for the depositing, storage, and collection of non-hazardous materials for
recycling, including (at a minimum) paper, corrugated cardboard, glass, plastics, organic
waste, and metals or meet a lawfully enacted local recycling ordinance, if more restrictive
(5.410.1).
• Water conserving plumbing fixtures and fittings. Plumbing fixtures (water closets and
urinals) and fittings (faucets and showerheads) shall comply with the following:
o Water Closets. The effective flush volume of all water closets shall not exceed
1.28 gallons per flush (5.303.3.1)
o Urinals. The effective flush volume of wall-mounted urinals shall not exceed
0.125 gallons per flush (5.303.3.2.1). The effective flush volume of floor- mounted or
other urinals shall not exceed 0.5 gallons per flush (5.303.3.2.2).
o Showerheads. Single showerheads shall have a minimum flow rate of not more than 1.8
gallons per minute and 80 psi (5.303.3.3.1). When a shower is served by more than one
showerhead, the combine flow rate of all showerheads and/or other shower outlets
controlled by a single valve shall not exceed 1.8 gallons per minute at 80 psi (5.303.3.3.2).
o Faucets and fountains. Nonresidential lavatory faucets shall have a maximum flow
rate of not more than 0.5 gallons per minute at 60 psi (5.303.3.4.1). Kitchen faucets shall
have a maximum flow rate of not more than 1.8 gallons per minute of 60 psi
(5.303.3.4.2). Wash fountains shall have a maximum flow rate of not more than 1.8
gallons per minute (5.303.3.4.3). Metering faucets shall not deliver more than 0.20
gallons per cycle (5.303.3.4.4). Metering faucets for wash fountains shall have a
maximum flow rate not more than 0.20 gallons per cycle (5.303.3.4.5).
• Outdoor potable water uses in landscaped areas. Nonresidential developments shall comply
with a local water efficient landscape ordinance or the current California Department of
Water Resources’ Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO), whichever is more
stringent (5.304.1).
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
20
• Water meters. Separate submeters or metering devices shall be installed for new
buildings or additions in excess of 50,000 sf or for excess consumption where any tenant
within a new building or within an addition that is project to consume more than 1,000
gallons per day (GPD) (5.303.1.1 and 5.303.1.2).
• Outdoor water uses in rehabilitated landscape projects equal or greater than 2,500 sf.
Rehabilitated landscape projects with an aggregate landscape area equal to or greater than
2,500 sf requiring a building or landscape permit (5.304.3).
• Commissioning. For new buildings 10,000 sf and over, building commissioning shall be
included in the design and construction processes of the building project to verify that the
building systems and components meet the owner’s or owner representative’s project
requirements (5.410.2).
3.2.4 AB 1493 PAVLEY REGULATIONS AND FUEL EFFICIENCY STANDARDS
California AB 1493, enacted on July 22, 2002, required CARB to develop and adopt regulations
that reduce GHGs emitted by passenger vehicles and light duty trucks. Under this legislation,
CARB adopted regulations to reduce GHG emissions from non-commercial passenger vehicles
(cars and light-duty trucks). Although aimed at reducing GHG emissions, specifically, a co-benefit
of the Pavley standards is an improvement in fuel efficiency and consequently a reduction in fuel
consumption.
3.2.5 CALIFORNIA’S RENEWABLE PORTFOLIO STANDARD (RPS)
First established in 2002 under Senate Bill (SB) 1078, California’s Renewable Portfolio Standards
(RPS) requires retail sellers of electric services to increase procurement from eligible renewable
resources to 33% of total retail sales by 2020 (18).
3.2.6 CLEAN ENERGY AND POLLUTION REDUCTION ACT OF 2015 (SB 350)
In October 2015, the legislature approved, and the Governor signed SB 350, which reaffirms
California’s commitment to reducing its GHG emissions and addressing climate change. Key
provisions include an increase in the renewables portfolio standard (RPS), higher energy
efficiency requirements for buildings, initial strategies towards a regional electricity grid, and
improved infrastructure for electric vehicle charging stations. Specifically, SB 350 requires the
following to reduce statewide GHG emissions:
• Increase the amount of electricity procured from renewable energy sources from 33% to 50% by
2030, with interim targets of 40% by 2024, and 25% by 2027.
• Double the energy efficiency in existing buildings by 2030. This target will be achieved through
the California Public Utility Commission (CPUC), the California Energy Commission (CEC), and local
publicly owned utilities.
• Reorganize the Independent System Operator (ISO) to develop more regional electrify
transmission markets and to improve accessibility in these markets, which will facilitate the
growth of renewable energy markets in the western United States (California Leginfo 2015).
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
21
3.2.7 100 PERCENT CLEAN ENERGY ACT OF 2018 (SB 100)
In September 2018, the legislature approved, and the Governor signed SB 100, which builds on
the targets established in SB 1078 and SB 350. Most notably, SB 100 sets a goal of powering all
retail electricity sold in California with renewable and zero-carbon resources. Additionally, SB 100
updates the interim renewables target from 50% to 60% by 2030.
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
22
This page intentionally left blank
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
23
4 PROJECT ENERGY DEMANDS AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY MEASURES
4.1 EVALUATION CRITERIA
Per Appendix F of the State CEQA Guidelines (19), states that the means of achieving the goal of
energy conservation includes the following:
• Decreasing overall per capita energy consumption;
• Decreasing reliance on fossil fuels such as coal, natural gas, and oil; and
• Increasing reliance on renewable energy sources.
In compliance with Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines (20), this report analyzes the
project’s anticipated energy use during construction and operations to determine if the Project
would:
• Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary
consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation; or
• Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency
4.2 METHODOLOGY
Information from the CalEEMod Version 2021.1. outputs for the Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue
Warehouse Air Quality Impact Analysis (AQIA) (21) was utilized in this analysis, detailing Project
related construction equipment, transportation energy demands, and facility energy demands.
4.2.1 CALEEMOD
In May 2022 California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) in conjunction with
other California air districts, including SCAQMD, released the latest version of the CalEEMod
Version 2022.1. The purpose of this model is to calculate construction-source and operational-
source criteria pollutants and GHG emissions from direct and indirect sources as well as energy
usage (22). Accordingly, the latest version of CalEEMod has been used to determine the proposed
Project’s anticipated transportation and facility energy demands. Outputs from the annual model
runs are provided in Appendices 4.1.
4.2.2 EMISSION FACTORS MODEL
On May 2, 2022, the EPA approved the 2021 version of the EMissions FACtor model (EMFAC) web
database for use in State Implementation Plan and transportation conformity analyses.
EMFAC2021 is a mathematical model that was developed to calculate emission rates, fuel
consumption, VMT from motor vehicles that operate on highways, freeways, and local roads in
California and is commonly used by the CARB to project changes in future emissions from on-
road mobile sources (23). This energy study utilizes the different fuel types for each vehicle class
from the annual EMFAC2021 emission inventory in order to derive the average vehicle fuel
economy which is then used to determine the estimated annual fuel consumption associated
with vehicle usage during Project construction and operational activities. For purposes of
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
24
analysis, the 2024 through 2025 analysis years were utilized to determine the average vehicle
fuel economy used throughout the duration of the Project. Output from the EMFAC2021 model
run is provided in Appendix 4.2.
4.3 CONSTRUCTION ENERGY DEMANDS
The focus within this section is the energy implications of the construction process, specifically
the power cost from on-site electricity consumption during construction of the proposed Project.
4.3.1 CONSTRUCTION POWER COST
The total Project construction power costs is the summation of the products of the area (sf) by
the construction duration and the typical power cost.
CONSTRUCTION DURATION
Construction is anticipated to begin in January 2024 and will last through June 2025 (21). The
construction schedule utilized in the analysis, shown in Table 4-1, represents a “worst-case”
analysis scenario. The duration of construction activity and associated equipment represents a
reasonable approximation of the expected construction fleet as required per CEQA Guidelines
(24).
TABLE 4-1: CONSTRUCTION DURATION
Construction Activity Start Date End Date Days
Demolition 1/1/2024 1/29/2024 20
Site Preparation 1/30/2024 3/11/2024 30
Grading 3/12/2024 4/22/2024 30
Building Construction 4/23/2024 6/16/2025 300
Paving 2/11/2025 6/16/2025 90
Architectural Coating 3/25/2025 6/16/2025 60
PROJECT CONSTRUCTION POWER COST
The 2022 National Construction Estimator identifies a typical power cost per 1,000 sf of
construction per month of $2.41, which was used to calculate the Project’s total construction
power cost (25).
As shown on Table 4-2, the total power cost of the on-site electricity usage during the
construction of the Project is estimated to be approximately $37,060.48.
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
25
TABLE 4-2: CONSTRUCTION POWER COST
Land Use Power Cost
(per 1,000 SF)
Size
(1,000 SF)
Construction
Duration
(months)
Project
Construction
Power Cost
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail $2.41 540.849 17 $22,158.58
Parking Lot $2.41 155.074 17 $6,353.38
Other Asphalt Surfaces $2.41 208.653 17 $8,548.51
CONSTRUCTION POWER COST $37,060.48
4.3.2 CONSTRUCTION ELECTRICITY USAGE
The total Project construction electricity usage is the summation of the products of the power
cost (estimated in Table 4-2) by the utility provider cost per kilowatt hour (kWh) of electricity.
PROJECT CONSTRUCTION ELECTRICITY USAGE
The SCE’s general service rate schedule was used to determine the Project’s electrical usage. As
of January 1, 2022, SCE’s general service rate is $0.13 per kilowatt hours (kWh) of electricity for
industrial services (26). As shown on Table 4-3, the total electricity usage from on-site Project
construction related activities is estimated to be approximately 281,358 kWh.
TABLE 4-3: CONSTRUCTION ELECTRICITY USAGE
Land Use Cost per kWh
Project
Construction Electricity Usage
(kWh)
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail $0.13 168,225
Parking Lot $0.13 48,234
Other Asphalt Surfaces $0.13 64,899
CONSTRUCTION ELECTRICITY USAGE 281,358
4.3.3 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FUEL ESTIMATES
Fuel consumed by construction equipment would be the primary energy resource expended over
the course of Project construction.
CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
Consistent with industry standards and typical construction practices, each piece of equipment
listed in Table 4-4 will operate up to a total of eight (8) hours per day, or more than two-thirds of
the period during which construction activities are allowed pursuant to the code. It should be
noted that most pieces of equipment would likely operate for fewer hours per day. A summary
of construction equipment assumptions by phase is provided at Table 4-4.
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
26
TABLE 4-4: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ASSUMPTIONS
Construction Activity Equipment Amount Hours Per Day
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8
Excavators 3 8
Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8
Crawler Tractors 4 8
Grading
Excavators 2 8
Graders 1 8
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8
Scrapers 2 8
Crawler Tractors 2 8
Building Construction
Cranes 1 8
Forklifts 6 8
Generator Sets 2 8
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 6 8
Welders 2 8
Paving
Pavers 2 8
Paving Equipment 2 8
Rollers 2 8
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 8
PROJECT CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FUEL CONSUMPTION
Project construction activity timeline estimates, construction equipment schedules, equipment
power ratings, load factors, and associated fuel consumption estimates are presented in Table 4-
5. The aggregate fuel consumption rate for all equipment is estimated at 18.5 horsepower hour
per gallon (hp-hr-gal.), obtained from CARB 2018 Emissions Factors Tables and cited fuel
consumption rate factors presented in Table D-24 of the Moyer guidelines (27). For the purposes
of this analysis, the calculations are based on all construction equipment being diesel-powered
which is consistent with industry standards. Diesel fuel would be supplied by existing commercial
fuel providers serving the Project area and region2. As presented in Table 4-5, Project
construction activities would consume an estimated 85,533 gallons of diesel fuel. Project
construction would represent a “single-event” diesel fuel demand and would not require on-
going or permanent commitment of diesel fuel resources for this purpose.
2 Based on Appendix A of the CalEEMod User’s Guide, Construction consists of several types of off-road equipment. Since the majority of the off-road construction equipment used for construction projects are diesel fueled, CalEEMod assumes all of the equipment operates on diesel fuel.
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
27
TABLE 4-5: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES
Construction Activity Duration
(Days) Equipment HP Rating Quantity Usage
Hours
Load
Factor
HP-
hrs/day
Total Fuel
Consumption
Demolition 20
Concrete/Industrial Saws 33 1 8 0.73 193 208
Excavators 36 3 8 0.38 328 355
Rubber Tired Dozers 367 2 8 0.4 2,349 2,539
Site Preparation 30 Rubber Tired Dozers 367 3 8 0.4 3,523 5,713
Crawler Tractors 87 4 8 0.43 1,197 1,941
Grading 30
Excavators 36 2 8 0.38 219 355
Graders 148 1 8 0.41 485 787
Rubber Tired Dozers 367 1 8 0.4 1,174 1,904
Scrapers 423 2 8 0.48 3,249 5,268
Crawler Tractors 87 2 8 0.43 599 971
Building Construction 300
Cranes 367 1 8 0.29 851 13,807
Forklifts 82 6 8 0.2 787 12,765
Generator Sets 14 2 8 0.74 166 2,688
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 84 6 8 0.37 1,492 24,192
Welders 46 2 8 0.45 331 5,371
Paving 90
Pavers 81 2 8 0.42 544 2,648
Paving Equipment 89 2 8 0.36 513 2,494
Rollers 36 2 8 0.38 219 1,065
Architectural Coating 60 Air Compressors 37 1 8 0.48 142 461
CONSTRUCTION FUEL DEMAND (GALLONS DIESEL FUEL) 85,533
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
28
4.3.3 CONSTRUCTION TRIPS AND VMT
Construction generates on-road vehicle emissions from vehicle usage for workers, hauling, and
vendors commuting to and from the site. The number of workers, hauling, and vendor trips are
presented below in Table 4-6. It should be noted that for Vendor Trips, specifically, CalEEMod
only assigns Vendor Trips to the Building Construction phase. Vendor trips would likely occur
during all phases of construction. As such, the CalEEMod defaults for Vendor Trips have been
adjusted based on a ratio of the total vendor trips to the number of days of each subphase of
activity.
TABLE 4-6: CONSTRUCTION TRIPS AND VMT
Construction Activity Worker Trips
Per Day
Vendor Trips
Per Day
Hauling Trips
Per Day
Demolition 15 5 16
Site Preparation 18 7 0
Grading 20 7 0
Building Construction 227 70 0
Paving 15 0 0
Architectural Coating 45 0 0
4.3.4 CONSTRUCTION WORKER FUEL ESTIMATES
With respect to estimated VMT for the Project, the construction worker trips would generate an
estimated 1,346,373 VMT during the 17 months of construction (21). Based on CalEEMod
methodology, it is assumed that 50% of all vendor trips are from light-duty-auto vehicles (LDA),
25% are from light-duty-trucks (LDT13), and 25% are from light-duty-trucks (LDT24). Data
regarding Project related construction worker trips were based on CalEEMod defaults utilized
within the AQIA.
Vehicle fuel efficiencies for LDA, LDT1, and LDT2 were estimated using information generated
within the 2021 version of the EMFAC developed by CARB. EMFAC2021 is a mathematical model
that was developed to calculate emission rates, fuel consumption, and VMT from motor vehicles
that operate on highways, freeways, and local roads in California and is commonly used by the
CARB to project changes in future emissions from on-road mobile sources (23). EMFAC2021 was
run for the LDA, LDT1, and LDT2 vehicle class within the California sub-area for the 2024 through
2025 calendar years. Data from EMFAC2021 is shown in Appendix 4.2.
Table 4-7 provides an estimated annual fuel consumption resulting from Project construction
worker trips. Based on Table 4-7, it is estimated that 49,106 gallons of fuel will be consumed
related to construction worker trips during full construction of the Project.
3 Vehicles under the LDT1 category have a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of less than 6,000 lbs. and equivalent test weight (ETW) of less
than or equal to 3,750 lbs. 4 Vehicles under the LDT2 category have a GVWR of less than 6,000 lbs. and ETW between 3,751 lbs. and 5,750 lbs.
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
29
TABLE 4-7: CONSTRUCTION WORKER FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES
Year Construction Activity Duration
(Days)
Worker
Trips/Day
Trip
Length
(miles)
VMT
Average Vehicle
Fuel Economy
(mpg)
Estimated Fuel
Consumption
(gallons)
2024
LDA
Demolition 21 8 18.5 3,108 31.57 98
Site Preparation 30 9 18.5 4,995 31.57 158
Grading 30 10 18.5 5,550 31.57 176
Building Construction 181 114 18.5 381,729 31.57 12,090
LDT1
Demolition 21 4 18.5 1,554 24.59 63
Site Preparation 30 5 18.5 2,775 24.59 113
Grading 30 5 18.5 2,775 24.59 113
Building Construction 181 57 18.5 190,865 24.59 7,761
LDT2
Demolition 21 4 18.5 1,554 24.51 63
Site Preparation 30 5 18.5 2,775 24.51 113
Grading 30 5 18.5 2,775 24.51 113
Building Construction 181 57 18.5 190,865 24.51 7,789
2025
LDA
Building Construction 119 114 18.5 250,971 32.57 7,706
Paving 90 8 18.5 13,320 32.57 409
Architectural Coating 60 23 18.5 25,530 32.57 784
LDT1
Building Construction 119 57 18.5 125,486 25.11 4,997
Paving 90 4 18.5 6,660 25.11 265
Architectural Coating 60 12 18.5 13,320 25.11 530
LDT2
Building Construction 119 57 18.5 125,486 25.24 4,972
Paving 90 4 18.5 6,660 25.24 264
Architectural Coating 60 12 18.5 13,320 25.24 528
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION WORKER FUEL CONSUMPTION 49,106
It should be noted that construction worker trips would represent a “single-event” gasoline fuel
demand and would not require on-going or permanent commitment of fuel resources for this
purpose.
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
30
4.3.5 CONSTRUCTION VENDOR/HAULING FUEL ESTIMATES
With respect to estimated VMT, the construction vendor trips (vehicles that deliver materials to
the site during construction) would generate an estimated 227,101 VMT along area roadways for
the Project over the duration of construction activity (21). It is assumed that 50% of all vendor
trips are from medium-heavy duty trucks (MHDT), 50% of vendor trips are from heavy-heavy duty
trucks (HHDT), and 100% of hauling trips are from HHDTs. These assumptions are consistent with
the CalEEMod defaults utilized within the within the AQIA (21). Vehicle fuel efficiencies for
MHDTs and HHDTs were estimated using information generated within EMFAC2021. EMFAC2021
was run for the MHDT and HHDT vehicle classes within the California sub-area for the 2024
through 2025 calendar years. Data from EMFAC2021 is shown in Appendix 4.2.
Based on Table 4-8, it is estimated that 32,423 gallons of fuel will be consumed related to
construction vendor trips during full construction of the Project.
TABLE 4-8: CONSTRUCTION VENDOR FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES (1 OF 3)
Year Construction Activity Duration
(Days)
Vendor/
Hauling
Trips/Day
Trip
Length
(miles)
VMT
Average Vehicle
Fuel Economy
(mpg)
Estimated Fuel
Consumption
(gallons)
2024
MHDT
Demolition 21 3 10.2 643 8.34 77
Site Preparation 30 4 10.2 1,224 8.34 147
Grading 30 4 10.2 1,224 8.34 147
Building Construction 181 35 10.2 64,617 8.34 7,747
HHDT (Vendor)
Demolition 21 3 10.2 643 6.03 107
Site Preparation 30 4 10.2 1,224 6.03 203
Grading 30 4 10.2 1,224 6.03 203
Building Construction 181 35 10.2 64,617 6.03 10,724
HHDT (Hauling)
Demolition 21 16 20 6,720 6.03 1,115
2025
MHDT
Building Construction 119 35 10.2 42,483 8.46 5,023
HHDT (Vendor)
Building Construction 119 35 10.2 42,483 6.13 6,930
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION VENDOR/HAULING FUEL CONSUMPTION 32,423
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
31
It should be noted that Project construction vendor trips would represent a “single-event” diesel
fuel demand and would not require on-going or permanent commitment of diesel fuel resources
for this purpose.
4.3.6 CONSTRUCTION ENERGY EFFICIENCY/CONSERVATION MEASURES
Starting in 2014, CARB adopted the nation's first regulation aimed at cleaning up off-road
construction equipment such as bulldozers, graders, and backhoes. These requirements ensure
fleets gradually turnover the oldest and dirtiest equipment to newer, cleaner models and prevent
fleets from adding older, dirtier equipment. As such, the equipment used for Project construction
would conform to CARB regulations and California emissions standards. It should also be noted
that there are no unusual Project characteristics or construction processes that would require
the use of equipment that would be more energy intensive than is used for comparable activities;
or equipment that would not conform to current emissions standards (and related fuel
efficiencies). Equipment employed in construction of the Project would therefore not result in
inefficient wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of fuel.
Construction contractors would be required to comply with applicable CARB regulation regarding
retrofitting, repowering, or replacement of diesel off-road construction equipment. Additionally,
CARB has adopted the Airborne Toxic Control Measure to limit heavy-duty diesel motor vehicle
idling in order to reduce public exposure to diesel particulate matter and other Toxic Air
Contaminants. Compliance with anti-idling and emissions regulations would result in a more
efficient use of construction-related energy and the minimization or elimination of wasteful or
unnecessary consumption of energy. Idling restrictions and the use of newer engines and
equipment would result in less fuel combustion and energy consumption.
Additional construction-source energy efficiencies would occur due to required California
regulations and best available control measures (BACM). For example, CCR Title 13, Motor
Vehicles, section 2449(d)(3) Idling, limits idling times of construction vehicles to no more than
five minutes, thereby precluding unnecessary and wasteful consumption of fuel due to
unproductive idling of construction equipment. Section 2449(d)(3) requires that grading plans
shall reference the requirement that a sign shall be posted on-site stating that construction
workers need to shut off engines at or before five minutes of idling.” In this manner, construction
equipment operators are required to be informed that engines are to be turned off at or prior to
five minutes of idling. Enforcement of idling limitations is realized through periodic site
inspections conducted by City building officials, and/or in response to citizen complaints.
A full analysis related to the energy needed to form construction materials is not included in this
analysis due to a lack of detailed Project-specific information on construction materials. At this
time, an analysis of the energy needed to create Project-related construction materials would be
extremely speculative and thus has not been prepared.
In general, the construction processes promote conservation and efficient use of energy by
reducing raw materials demands, with related reduction in energy demands associated with raw
materials extraction, transportation, processing, and refinement. Use of materials in bulk reduces
energy demands associated with preparation and transport of construction materials as well as
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
32
the transport and disposal of construction waste and solid waste in general, with corollary
reduced demands on area landfill capacities and energy consumed by waste transport and landfill
operations.
4.4 OPERATIONAL ENERGY DEMANDS
Energy consumption in support of or related to Project operations would include transportation
energy demands (energy consumed by passenger car and truck vehicles accessing the Project
site) and facilities energy demands (energy consumed by building operations and site
maintenance activities).
4.4.1 TRANSPORTATION ENERGY DEMANDS
Energy that would be consumed by Project-generated traffic is a function of total VMT and
estimated vehicle fuel economies of vehicles accessing the Project site. The VMT per vehicle class
can be determined by evaluated in the vehicle fleet mix and the total VMT. As with worker and
vendors trips, operational vehicle fuel efficiencies were estimated using information generated
within EMFAC2021 developed by CARB (23). EMFAC2021 was run for the San Bernardino County
area for the 2025 calendar year. Data from EMFAC2021 is shown in Appendix 4.2.
As summarized on Table 4-9 the Project will result in 3,593,663 annual VMT and an estimated
annual fuel consumption of 396,865 gallons of fuel.
TABLE 4-9: TOTAL PROJECT-GENERATED TRAFFIC ANNUAL FUEL CONSUMPTION
Vehicle Type Annual VMT Average Vehicle Fuel
Economy (mpg)
Estimated Annual Fuel
Consumption (gallons)
LDA 508,864 32.57 15,625
LDT1 41,158 25.11 1,639
LDT2 207,411 25.24 8,218
MDV 156,311 20.54 7,610
MCY 21,414 42.15 508
LHDT1 356,884 16.22 22,008
LHDT2 97,007 15.27 6,354
MHDT 551,153 8.46 65,167
HHDT 1,653,460 6.13 269,737
TOTAL (ALL VEHICLES) 3,593,663 396,865
4.4.2 FACILITY ENERGY DEMANDS
Project building operations activities would result in the consumption of electricity. Electricity
would be supplied to the Project by SCE. Electricity demands of the Project are summarized in
Table 4-10 and provided in Appendix 4.1.
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
33
TABLE 4-10: PROJECT ANNUAL OPERATIONAL NATURAL GAS DEMAND SUMMARY
Land Use Electricity Demand (kWh/year)
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 2,498,021
Parking Lot 135,997
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0
TOTAL PROJECT ENERGY DEMAND 2,634,018
kBTU – kilo-British Thermal Units
4.4.3 OPERATIONAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY/CONSERVATION MEASURES
Energy efficiency/energy conservation attributes of the Project would be complemented by
increasingly stringent state and federal regulatory actions addressing vehicle fuel economies and
vehicle emissions standards; and enhanced building/utilities energy efficiencies mandated under
California building codes (e.g., Title24, California Green Building Standards Code).
ENHANCED VEHICLE FUEL EFFICIENCIES
Project annual fuel consumption estimates presented previously in Table 4-9 represent likely
potential maximums that would occur for the Project. Under subsequent future conditions,
average fuel economies of vehicles accessing the Project site can be expected to improve as
older, less fuel-efficient vehicles are removed from circulation, and in response to fuel economy
and emissions standards imposed on newer vehicles entering the circulation system.
Enhanced fuel economies realized pursuant to federal and state regulatory actions, and related
transition of vehicles to alternative energy sources (e.g., electricity, natural gas, biofuels,
hydrogen cells) would likely decrease future gasoline fuel demands per VMT. Location of the
Project proximate to regional and local roadway systems tends to reduce VMT within the region,
acting to reduce regional vehicle energy demands.
The Property Owner/Developer would comply with the City‘s transportation demand
management ordinance (see Chapter 17.78 of the Development Code).
4.5 SUMMARY
4.5.1 CONSTRUCTION ENERGY DEMANDS
The estimated power cost of on-site electricity usage during the construction of the Project is
assumed to be approximately $37,060.48. Additionally, based on the assumed power cost, it is
estimated that the total electricity usage during construction, after full Project build-out, is
calculated to be approximately 281,358 kWh.
Construction equipment used by the Project would result in single event consumption of
approximately 85,533 gallons of diesel fuel. Construction equipment use of fuel would not be
atypical for the type of construction proposed because there are no aspects of the Project’s
proposed construction process that are unusual or energy-intensive, and Project construction
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
34
equipment would conform to the applicable CARB emissions standards, acting to promote
equipment fuel efficiencies.
CCR Title 13, Title 13, Motor Vehicles, section 2449(d)(3) Idling, limits idling times of construction
vehicles to no more than 5 minutes, thereby precluding unnecessary and wasteful consumption
of fuel due to unproductive idling of construction equipment. BACMs inform construction
equipment operators of this requirement. Enforcement of idling limitations is realized through
periodic site inspections conducted by City building officials, and/or in response to citizen
complaints.
Construction worker trips for full construction of the Project would result in the estimated fuel
consumption of 49,106 gallons of fuel. Additionally, fuel consumption from construction vendor
trips (MHDTs and HHDTs) will total approximately 32,423 gallons. Diesel fuel would be supplied
by City and regional commercial vendors. Indirectly, construction energy efficiencies and energy
conservation would be achieved using bulk purchases, transport and use of construction
materials. The 2021 IEPR released by the CEC has shown that fuel efficiencies are getting better
within on and off-road vehicle engines due to more stringent government requirements (28). As
supported by the preceding discussions, Project construction energy consumption would not be
considered inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary.
4.5.2 OPERATIONAL ENERGY DEMANDS
TRANSPORTATION ENERGY DEMANDS
Annual vehicular trips and related VMT generated by the operation of the Project would result in
a fuel demand of 396,865 gallons of fuel.
Fuel would be provided by current and future commercial vendors. Trip generation and VMT
generated by the Project are consistent with other industrial uses of similar scale and
configuration, as reflected respectively in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip
Generation Manual ((11th Ed., 2021); and CalEEMod. As such, Project operations would not result
in excessive and wasteful vehicle trips and VMT, nor excess and wasteful vehicle energy
consumption compared to other industrial uses.
It should be noted that the state strategy for the transportation sector for medium and heavy-
duty trucks is focused on making trucks more efficient and expediting truck turnover rather than
reducing VMT from trucks. This is in contrast to the passenger vehicle component of the
transportation sector where both per-capita VMT reductions and an increase in vehicle efficiency
are forecasted to be needed to achieve the overall state emissions reductions goals.
Heavy duty trucks involved in goods movements are generally controlled on the technology side
and through fleet turnover of older trucks and engines to newer and cleaner trucks and engines.
The first battery-electric heavy-heavy duty trucks are being tested this year and SCAQMD is
looking to integrate this new technology into large-scale truck operations. The following state
strategies reduce GHG emissions from the medium and heavy-duty trucks:
• CARB’s Mobile Source Strategy focuses on reducing GHGs through the transition to zero and low
emission vehicles and from medium-duty and heavy-duty trucks.
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
35
• CARB’s Sustainable Freight Action Plan establishes a goal to improve freight efficiency by 25
percent by 2030, deploy over 100,000 freight vehicles and equipment capable of zero emission
operation and maximize both zero and near-zero emission freight vehicles and equipment
powered by renewable energy by 2030.
• CARB’s Emissions Reduction Plan for Ports and Goods Movement (Goods Movement Plan) in
California focuses on reducing heavy-duty truck-related emissions focus on establishment of
emissions standards for trucks, fleet turnover, truck retrofits, and restriction on truck idling (CARB
2006). While the focus of Goods Movement Plan is to reduce criteria air pollutant and air toxic
emissions, the strategies to reduce these pollutants would also generally have a beneficial effect
in reducing GHG emissions.
• CARB’s On-Road Truck and Bus Regulation (2010) requires diesel trucks and buses that operate in
California to be upgraded to reduce emissions. Newer heavier trucks and buses must meet
particulate matter filter requirements beginning January 1, 2012. Lighter and older heavier trucks
must be replaced starting January 1, 2015. By January 1, 2023, nearly all trucks and buses will
need to have 2010 model year engines or equivalent (29).
• CARB’s Heavy-Duty (Tractor-Trailer) GHG Regulation requires SmartWay tractor trailers that
include idle-reduction technologies, aerodynamic technologies, and low-rolling resistant tires that
would reduce fuel consumption and associated GHG emissions.
The proposed Project would implement project design features that would facilitate the
accessibility, parking, and loading of trucks on site.
Enhanced fuel economies realized pursuant to federal and state regulatory actions, and related
transition of vehicles to alternative energy sources (e.g., electricity, natural gas, biofuels,
hydrogen cells) would likely decrease future gasoline fuel demands per VMT. Location of the
Project proximate to regional and local roadway systems tends to reduce VMT within the region,
acting to reduce regional vehicle energy demands. The Project would implement sidewalks,
facilitating and encouraging pedestrian access. Facilitating pedestrian and bicycle access would
reduce VMT and associated energy consumption. In compliance with the California Green
Building Standards Code and City requirements, the Project would promote the use of bicycles
as an alternative mean of transportation by providing short-term and/or long-term bicycle
parking accommodations. As supported by the preceding discussions, Project transportation
energy consumption would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary.
FACILITY ENERGY DEMANDS
Project facility operational energy demands are estimated at: 2,634,018 kWh/year of electricity.
Electricity would be supplied by SCE. The Project proposes conventional industrial uses reflecting
contemporary energy efficient/energy conserving designs and operational programs. The Project
does not propose uses that are inherently energy intensive and the energy demands in total
would be comparable to other industrial uses of similar scale and configuration.
Lastly, the Project will comply with the applicable Title 24 standards. Compliance itself with
applicable Title 24 standards will ensure that the Project energy demands would not be
inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary.
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
36
This page intentionally left blank
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
37
5 CONCLUSIONS
5.1 ENERGY IMPACT 1
Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or
unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation.
As supported by the preceding analyses, Project construction and operations would not result in
the inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of energy. The Project would therefore not
cause or result in the need for additional energy producing or transmission facilities. The Project
would not engage in wasteful or inefficient uses of energy and aims to achieve energy
conservations goals within the State of California.
5.2 ENERGY IMPACT 2
Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency.
The Project’s consistency with the applicable state and local plans is discussed below.
CONSISTENCY WITH ISTEA
Transportation and access to the Project site is provided by the local and regional roadway
systems. The Project would not interfere with, nor otherwise obstruct intermodal transportation
plans or projects that may be realized pursuant to the ISTEA because SCAG is not planning for
intermodal facilities on or through the Project site.
CONSISTENCY WITH TEA-21
The Project site is located along major transportation corridors with proximate access to the
Interstate freeway system. The site selected for the Project facilitates access, acts to reduce
vehicle miles traveled, takes advantage of existing infrastructure systems, and promotes land use
compatibilities through collocation of similar uses. The Project supports the strong planning
processes emphasized under TEA-21. The Project is therefore consistent with, and would not
otherwise interfere with, nor obstruct implementation of TEA-21.
CONSISTENCY WITH IEPR
Electricity would be provided to the Project by SCE. SCE’s Clean Power and Electrification Pathway
(CPEP) white paper builds on existing state programs and policies. As such, the Project is
consistent with, and would not otherwise interfere with, nor obstruct implementation the goals
presented in the 2021 IEPR.
Additionally, the Project will comply with the applicable Title 24 standards which would ensure
that the Project energy demands would not be inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary.
As such, development of the proposed Project would support the goals presented in the 2021
IEPR.
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
38
CONSISTENCY WITH STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY PLAN
The Project site is located along major transportation corridors with proximate access to the
Interstate freeway system. The site selected for the Project facilitates access and takes advantage
of existing infrastructure systems. The Project therefore supports urban design and planning
processes identified under the State of California Energy Plan, is consistent with, and would not
otherwise interfere with, nor obstruct implementation of the State of California Energy Plan.
CONSISTENCY WITH CALIFORNIA CODE TITLE 24, PART 6, ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS
The 2022 version of Title 24 was adopted by the CEC and will become effective on January 1,
2023. The Project would be required to comply with the applicable standards in place at the time
building permit document submittals are made. Therefore, the Project would not result in a
significant impact on energy resources (30). The proposed Project would be subject to Title 24
standards.
CONSISTENCY WITH CALIFORNIA CODE TITLE 24, PART 11, CALGREEN
As previously stated, CCR, Title 24, Part 11: CALGreen is a comprehensive and uniform regulatory
code for all residential, commercial, and school buildings that went in effect on January 1, 2009,
and is administered by the California Building Standards Commission. CALGreen is updated on a
regular basis, with the most recent approved update consisting of the 2022 California Green
Building Code Standards which will become effective January 1, 2023. The proposed Project
would be required to comply with the applicable standards in place at the time building permit
document submittals are made.
CONSISTENCY WITH AB 1493
AB 1493 is not applicable to the Project as it is a statewide measure establishing vehicle emissions
standards. No feature of the Project would interfere with implementation of the requirements
under AB 1493.
CONSISTENCY WITH RPS
California’s RPS is not applicable to the Project as it is a statewide measure that establishes a
renewable energy mix. No feature of the Project would interfere with implementation of the
requirements under RPS.
CONSISTENCY WITH SB 350
The proposed Project would use energy from SCE, which have committed to diversify their
portfolio of energy sources by increasing energy from wind and solar sources. No feature of the
Project would interfere with implementation of SB 350. Additionally, the Project would be
designed and constructed to implement the energy efficiency measures for new industrial
developments and would include several measures designed to reduce energy consumption.
As shown above, the Project would not conflict with any of the state or local plans. As such, a less
than significant impact is expected.
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
39
This page intentionally left blank
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
40
6 REFERENCES
1. Association of Environmental Professionals. 2020 CEQA California Environmental Quality Act. 2020.
2. Administration, U.S. Energy Information. California State Profile and Energy Estimates. [Online]
https://www.eia.gov/state/data.php?sid=CA#ConsumptionExpenditures.
3. California Energy Commission. Transportation Energy Demand Forecast 2018-2030. 2018.
4. Alternate Fuels Data Center. U.S. Department of Energy. [Online] https://afdc.energy.gov/states/ca.
5. U.S. Energy Information Administration. California Energy Consumption by End-Use Sector 2019.
California State Profile and Energy Estimates. [Online] https://www.eia.gov/state/?sid=CA#tabs-2.
6. California Energy Commission. 2020 Total System Electric Generation. CA.gov. [Online]
https://www.energy.ca.gov/data-reports/energy-almanac/california-electricity-data/2020-total-
system-electric-generation.
7. U.S. Energy Information Administration. California State Profile and Energy Estimates . [Online]
https://www.eia.gov/state/?sid=CA.
8. California Energy Commission. 2013 Integrated Energy Policy Report. [Online] 2013.
http://www.energy.ca.gov/2013publications/CEC-100-2013-001/CEC-100-2013-001-CMF.pdf.
9. —. California Energy Almanac. Utility Energy Supply Plans from 2013. [Online]
https://www.energy.ca.gov/almanac/electricity_data/s-2_supply_forms_2013/.
10. California ISO. Understanding the ISO. [Online]
http://www.caiso.com/about/Pages/OurBusiness/UnderstandingtheISO/default.aspx.
11. California Energy Commission. 2021 Power Content Label - Southern California Edison. [Online]
https://www.sce.com/sites/default/files/custom-
files/Web%20files/2021%20Power%20Content%20Label.pdf.
12. California Public Utilities Commission. Natural Gas and California. [Online]
http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/general.aspx?id=4802.
13. Department of Motor Vehicles. State of California Department of Motor Vehicles Statistics For
Publication January Through December 2021. 2021.
14. United States Energy Information Administration. California Analysis. Energy Information
Administration. [Online] https://www.eia.gov/beta/states/states/ca/analysis.
15. California Energy Commission Staff. 2020 Integrated Energy Policy Report Update. [Online] 2020.
https://www.energy.ca.gov/data-reports/reports/integrated-energy-policy-report/2020-
integrated-energy-policy-report-update.
16. California Energy Commission. Energy Commission Adopts Updated Building Standards to Improve
Efficiency, Reduce Emissions from Homes and Businesses. [Online] August 11, 2021.
https://www.energy.ca.gov/news/2021-08/energy-commission-adopts-updated-building-
standards-improve-efficiency-reduce-0.
17. California Department of General Services. 2022 CALGreen Code. CALGreen. [Online]
https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/CAGBC2022P1.
18. California Energy Commission. Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS). [Online] 2002.
http://www.energy.ca.gov/portfolio/.
19. State of California. California Environmental Quality Act Guideline, California Public Resources Code,
Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3,.
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
41
20. Association of Environmental Professionals. 2019 CEQA California Environmental Quality Act. 2019.
21. Urban Crossroads, Inc. Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Air Quality Impact Analysis. 2022.
22. California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). California Emissions Estimator Model
(CalEEMod). [Online] May 2022. www.caleemod.com.
23. California Department of Transportation. EMFAC Software. [Online]
http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/env/air/pages/emfac.htm.
24. State of California. 2019 CEQA California Environmental Quality Act. 2019.
25. Pray, Richard. 2022 National Construction Estimator. Carlsbad : Craftsman Book Company, 2022.
26. Southern California Edison. Schedule GS-1 General Service. Regulatory Information - Rates Pricing.
[Online] https://library.sce.com/content/dam/sce-
doclib/public/regulatory/tariff/electric/schedules/general-service-&-industrial-
rates/ELECTRIC_SCHEDULES_GS-1.pdf.
27. California Air Resources Board. Methods to Find the Cost-Effectiveness of Funding Air Quality
Projects For Evaluating Motor Vehicle Registration Fee Projects And Congestion Mitigation and Air
Quality Improvement (CMAQ) Projects, Emission Factor Tables. 2018.
28. California Energy Commission Staff. 2021 Integrated Energy Policy Report Update. [Online] 2021.
https://www.energy.ca.gov/data-reports/reports/integrated-energy-policy-report/2021-
integrated-energy-policy-report.
29. California Air Resources Board. Truck and Bus Regulation. [Online] https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-
work/programs/truck-and-bus-regulation.
30. The California Energy Commission. 2022 Building Energy Efficiency Standards. California Energy
Commission. [Online] 2022. https://www.energy.ca.gov/programs-and-topics/programs/building-
energy-efficiency-standards/2022-building-energy-efficiency.
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
42
This page intentionally left blank
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
43
7 CERTIFICATIONS
The contents of this energy analysis report represent an accurate depiction of the environmental
impacts associated with the proposed Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse. The
information contained in this energy analysis report is based on the best available data at the
time of preparation. If you have any questions, please contact me directly at
hqureshi@urbanxroads.com.
Haseeb Qureshi
Associate Principal
Urban Crossroads, Inc.
hqureshi@urbanxroads.com
EDUCATION
Master of Science in Environmental Studies
California State University, Fullerton • May 2010
Bachelor of Arts in Environmental Analysis and Design
University of California, Irvine • June 2006
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
AEP – Association of Environmental Planners
AWMA – Air and Waste Management Association
ASTM – American Society for Testing and Materials
PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS
Planned Communities and Urban Infill – Urban Land Institute • June 2011
Indoor Air Quality and Industrial Hygiene – EMSL Analytical • April 2008
Principles of Ambient Air Monitoring – California Air Resources Board • August 2007
AB2588 Regulatory Standards – Trinity Consultants • November 2006
Air Dispersion Modeling – Lakes Environmental • June 2006
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
This page intentionally left blank
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
APPENDIX 4.1:
CALEEMOD CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
1 / 52
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report
Table of Contents
1. Basic Project Information
1.1. Basic Project Information
1.2. Land Use Types
1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector
2. Emissions Summary
2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
3. Construction Emissions Details
3.1. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated
3.3. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated
3.5. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated
3.7. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
2 / 52
3.9. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
3.11. Paving (2025) - Unmitigated
3.13. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated
4. Operations Emissions Details
4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use
4.1.1. Unmitigated
4.2. Energy
4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
4.3. Area Emissions by Source
4.3.2. Unmitigated
4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use
4.4.2. Unmitigated
4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use
4.5.2. Unmitigated
4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use
4.6.1. Unmitigated
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
3 / 52
4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type
4.7.1. Unmitigated
4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type
4.8.1. Unmitigated
4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type
4.9.1. Unmitigated
4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated
4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated
4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated
5. Activity Data
5.1. Construction Schedule
5.2. Off-Road Equipment
5.2.1. Unmitigated
5.3. Construction Vehicles
5.3.1. Unmitigated
5.4. Vehicles
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
4 / 52
5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
5.5. Architectural Coatings
5.6. Dust Mitigation
5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
5.7. Construction Paving
5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors
5.9. Operational Mobile Sources
5.9.1. Unmitigated
5.10. Operational Area Sources
5.10.1. Hearths
5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
5.11. Operational Energy Consumption
5.11.1. Unmitigated
5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
5 / 52
5.12.1. Unmitigated
5.13. Operational Waste Generation
5.13.1. Unmitigated
5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment
5.14.1. Unmitigated
5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
5.15.1. Unmitigated
5.16. Stationary Sources
5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
5.16.2. Process Boilers
5.17. User Defined
5.18. Vegetation
5.18.1. Land Use Change
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
5.18.2. Sequestration
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
6 / 52
5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
6. Climate Risk Detailed Report
6.1. Climate Risk Summary
6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
7. Health and Equity Details
7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
7.4. Health & Equity Measures
7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
8. User Changes to Default Data
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
7 / 52
1. Basic Project Information
1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name 14581 Oleander and Santa Ana
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s)2.80
Precipitation (days)6.80
Location 34.05711223969459, -117.45159767923579
County San Bernardino-South Coast
City Fontana
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5310
EDFZ 10
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft)Landscape Area (sq
ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
541 1000sqft 12.4 540,849 159,626 ———
Parking Lot 396 Space 3.56 0.00 0.00 ———
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
8 / 52
———0.000.004.79Acre4.79Other Asphalt
Surfaces
User Defined
Industrial
541 User Defined Unit 0.00 0.00 0.00 ———
1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector
No measures selected
2. Emissions Summary
2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Un/Mit.TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.5.29 49.0 37.9 60.4 0.07 1.78 4.36 5.56 1.64 1.06 2.69 —12,172 12,172 0.58 0.52 21.1 12,362
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.5.47 48.9 42.9 54.9 0.07 2.25 5.95 8.21 2.07 2.76 4.83 —11,836 11,836 0.58 0.52 0.55 12,005
Average
Daily
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.3.05 8.62 20.1 27.8 0.04 0.86 2.57 3.43 0.79 0.75 1.54 —6,058 6,058 0.30 0.26 4.30 6,148
Annual
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.0.56 1.57 3.67 5.07 0.01 0.16 0.47 0.63 0.14 0.14 0.28 —1,003 1,003 0.05 0.04 0.71 1,018
2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
9 / 52
Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily -
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
2024 4.83 4.05 37.9 45.9 0.06 1.78 3.57 4.77 1.64 1.06 2.69 —9,735 9,735 0.48 0.47 19.2 9,908
2025 5.29 49.0 31.3 60.4 0.07 1.20 4.36 5.56 1.11 1.05 2.15 —12,172 12,172 0.58 0.52 21.1 12,362
Daily -
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
2024 5.47 4.59 42.9 41.2 0.06 2.25 5.95 8.21 2.07 2.76 4.83 —9,464 9,464 0.49 0.47 0.50 9,618
2025 5.20 48.9 31.5 54.9 0.07 1.20 4.36 5.56 1.11 1.05 2.15 —11,836 11,836 0.58 0.52 0.55 12,005
Average
Daily
——————————————————
2024 3.05 2.52 20.1 27.8 0.04 0.86 2.57 3.43 0.79 0.75 1.54 —6,058 6,058 0.30 0.26 4.30 6,148
2025 1.55 8.62 9.50 16.6 0.02 0.36 1.31 1.66 0.33 0.31 0.64 —3,622 3,622 0.18 0.16 2.79 3,678
Annual ——————————————————
2024 0.56 0.46 3.67 5.07 0.01 0.16 0.47 0.63 0.14 0.14 0.28 —1,003 1,003 0.05 0.04 0.71 1,018
2025 0.28 1.57 1.73 3.04 < 0.005 0.07 0.24 0.30 0.06 0.06 0.12 —600 600 0.03 0.03 0.46 609
2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Un/Mit.TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.9.31 19.6 31.1 54.7 0.28 0.47 5.45 5.92 0.46 1.23 1.68 514 34,520 35,034 54.7 4.97 92.8 37,975
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.4.99 15.6 32.4 29.3 0.28 0.44 5.45 5.89 0.42 1.23 1.64 514 34,226 34,739 54.7 4.98 2.41 37,593
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
10 / 52
Average
Daily
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.6.50 17.5 24.1 37.8 0.21 0.34 3.99 4.33 0.33 0.90 1.23 514 26,028 26,542 54.0 3.81 29.3 29,058
Annual
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit.1.19 3.20 4.40 6.91 0.04 0.06 0.73 0.79 0.06 0.16 0.22 85.0 4,309 4,394 8.94 0.63 4.86 4,811
2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Mobile 5.12 2.69 30.9 31.2 0.28 0.44 5.45 5.89 0.42 1.23 1.64 —31,081 31,081 2.38 4.35 92.8 32,530
Area 4.18 16.9 0.20 23.5 < 0.005 0.03 —0.03 0.04 —0.04 —96.7 96.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 —97.1
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —2,516 2,516 0.24 0.03 —2,530
Water ———————————240 826 1,066 24.7 0.59 —1,859
Waste ———————————274 0.00 274 27.4 0.00 —959
Total 9.31 19.6 31.1 54.7 0.28 0.47 5.45 5.92 0.46 1.23 1.68 514 34,520 35,034 54.7 4.97 92.8 37,975
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Mobile 4.99 2.55 32.4 29.3 0.28 0.44 5.45 5.89 0.42 1.23 1.64 —30,884 30,884 2.39 4.36 2.41 32,244
Area —13.0 ————————————————
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —2,516 2,516 0.24 0.03 —2,530
Water ———————————240 826 1,066 24.7 0.59 —1,859
Waste ———————————274 0.00 274 27.4 0.00 —959
Total 4.99 15.6 32.4 29.3 0.28 0.44 5.45 5.89 0.42 1.23 1.64 514 34,226 34,739 54.7 4.98 2.41 37,593
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
11 / 52
——————————————————Average
Daily
Mobile 3.64 1.86 23.9 21.7 0.21 0.32 3.99 4.31 0.31 0.90 1.20 —22,619 22,619 1.75 3.19 29.3 23,643
Area 2.86 15.7 0.14 16.1 < 0.005 0.02 —0.02 0.03 —0.03 —66.3 66.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 —66.5
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —2,516 2,516 0.24 0.03 —2,530
Water ———————————240 826 1,066 24.7 0.59 —1,859
Waste ———————————274 0.00 274 27.4 0.00 —959
Total 6.50 17.5 24.1 37.8 0.21 0.34 3.99 4.33 0.33 0.90 1.23 514 26,028 26,542 54.0 3.81 29.3 29,058
Annual ——————————————————
Mobile 0.66 0.34 4.37 3.97 0.04 0.06 0.73 0.79 0.06 0.16 0.22 —3,745 3,745 0.29 0.53 4.86 3,914
Area 0.52 2.86 0.02 2.94 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 0.01 —0.01 —11.0 11.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 —11.0
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —417 417 0.04 < 0.005 —419
Water ———————————39.7 137 176 4.08 0.10 —308
Waste ———————————45.4 0.00 45.4 4.53 0.00 —159
Total 1.19 3.20 4.40 6.91 0.04 0.06 0.73 0.79 0.06 0.16 0.22 85.0 4,309 4,394 8.94 0.63 4.86 4,811
3. Construction Emissions Details
3.1. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Onsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
12 / 52
3,437—0.030.143,4253,425—0.98—0.981.06—1.060.0321.724.92.623.12Off-Road
Equipment
Demolitio
n
——————0.88 0.88 —0.13 0.13 ———————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.17 0.14 1.36 1.19 < 0.005 0.06 —0.06 0.05 —0.05 —188 188 0.01 < 0.005 —188
Demolitio
n
——————0.05 0.05 —0.01 0.01 ———————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.03 0.03 0.25 0.22 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —31.1 31.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 —31.2
Demolitio
n
——————0.01 0.01 —< 0.005 < 0.005 ———————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.09 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 —198 198 0.01 0.01 0.02 200
Vendor 0.02 < 0.005 0.19 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 —157 157 0.01 0.02 0.01 164
Hauling 0.15 0.02 1.43 0.77 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.10 0.01 0.03 0.04 —1,113 1,113 0.12 0.18 0.06 1,169
Average
Daily
——————————————————
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
13 / 52
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 —11.0 11.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 11.2
Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —8.59 8.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 9.00
Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —61.0 61.0 0.01 0.01 0.06 64.1
Annual ——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 —1.82 1.82 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.85
Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —1.42 1.42 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.49
Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —10.1 10.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 10.6
3.3. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Onsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
5.35 4.49 42.5 35.3 0.05 2.25 —2.25 2.07 —2.07 —5,529 5,529 0.22 0.04 —5,548
Dust
From
Material
Movement
——————5.66 5.66 —2.69 2.69 ———————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.44 0.37 3.49 2.90 < 0.005 0.19 —0.19 0.17 —0.17 —454 454 0.02 < 0.005 —456
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
14 / 52
———————0.220.22—0.470.47——————Dust
From
Material
Movement
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.08 0.07 0.64 0.53 < 0.005 0.03 —0.03 0.03 —0.03 —75.2 75.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 —75.5
Dust
From
Material
Movement
——————0.08 0.08 —0.04 0.04 ———————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.10 0.09 0.10 1.12 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 —231 231 0.01 0.01 0.03 234
Vendor 0.02 0.01 0.26 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 —220 220 0.02 0.03 0.02 230
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 —19.2 19.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 19.5
Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —18.0 18.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 18.9
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 —3.19 3.19 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.23
Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —2.99 2.99 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.13
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
15 / 52
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.5. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Onsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
4.69 3.94 37.6 31.4 0.06 1.77 —1.77 1.63 —1.63 —6,715 6,715 0.27 0.05 —6,738
Dust
From
Material
Movement
——————2.67 2.67 —0.98 0.98 ———————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
4.69 3.94 37.6 31.4 0.06 1.77 —1.77 1.63 —1.63 —6,715 6,715 0.27 0.05 —6,738
Dust
From
Material
Movement
——————2.67 2.67 —0.98 0.98 ———————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.39 0.32 3.09 2.58 0.01 0.15 —0.15 0.13 —0.13 —552 552 0.02 < 0.005 —554
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
16 / 52
———————0.080.08—0.220.22——————Dust
From
Material
Movement
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.07 0.06 0.56 0.47 < 0.005 0.03 —0.03 0.02 —0.02 —91.4 91.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 —91.7
Dust
From
Material
Movement
——————0.04 0.04 —0.01 0.01 ———————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.11 0.10 0.10 1.69 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 —288 288 0.01 0.01 1.15 292
Vendor 0.02 0.01 0.25 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 —219 219 0.02 0.03 0.61 230
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.11 0.10 0.11 1.28 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 —264 264 0.01 0.01 0.03 267
Vendor 0.02 0.01 0.26 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 —220 220 0.02 0.03 0.02 230
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 —22.0 22.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 22.3
Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —18.0 18.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 18.9
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
17 / 52
Annual ——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 —3.64 3.64 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.69
Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —2.99 2.99 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.13
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.7. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Onsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
2.63 2.20 20.3 25.3 0.04 0.91 —0.91 0.84 —0.84 —4,270 4,270 0.17 0.03 —4,285
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
2.63 2.20 20.3 25.3 0.04 0.91 —0.91 0.84 —0.84 —4,270 4,270 0.17 0.03 —4,285
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
1.30 1.09 10.1 12.5 0.02 0.45 —0.45 0.42 —0.42 —2,114 2,114 0.09 0.02 —2,122
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.24 0.20 1.84 2.29 < 0.005 0.08 —0.08 0.08 —0.08 —350 350 0.01 < 0.005 —351
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
18 / 52
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 1.30 1.19 1.10 19.2 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 —3,270 3,270 0.14 0.11 13.1 3,320
Vendor 0.23 0.06 2.52 1.35 0.02 0.03 0.13 0.16 0.03 0.05 0.08 —2,195 2,195 0.17 0.33 6.12 2,303
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 1.24 1.12 1.30 14.5 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 —2,997 2,997 0.14 0.11 0.34 3,035
Vendor 0.23 0.06 2.62 1.37 0.02 0.03 0.13 0.16 0.03 0.05 0.08 —2,196 2,196 0.17 0.33 0.16 2,298
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker 0.61 0.55 0.64 7.55 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 —1,505 1,505 0.07 0.06 2.79 1,526
Vendor 0.11 0.03 1.31 0.67 0.01 0.02 0.06 0.08 0.02 0.02 0.04 —1,087 1,087 0.08 0.16 1.30 1,138
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Worker 0.11 0.10 0.12 1.38 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 —249 249 0.01 0.01 0.46 253
Vendor 0.02 0.01 0.24 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 —180 180 0.01 0.03 0.22 188
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.9. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Onsite ——————————————————
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
19 / 52
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
2.45 2.05 19.0 25.2 0.04 0.78 —0.78 0.72 —0.72 —4,270 4,270 0.17 0.03 —4,285
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
2.45 2.05 19.0 25.2 0.04 0.78 —0.78 0.72 —0.72 —4,270 4,270 0.17 0.03 —4,285
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.80 0.67 6.20 8.23 0.01 0.26 —0.26 0.24 —0.24 —1,396 1,396 0.06 0.01 —1,400
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.15 0.12 1.13 1.50 < 0.005 0.05 —0.05 0.04 —0.04 —231 231 0.01 < 0.005 —232
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 1.15 1.04 1.00 17.7 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 —3,201 3,201 0.13 0.11 11.9 3,250
Vendor 0.21 0.06 2.40 1.30 0.02 0.03 0.13 0.16 0.03 0.05 0.08 —2,159 2,159 0.17 0.33 6.08 2,267
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
20 / 52
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Worker 1.09 0.98 1.10 13.3 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 —2,935 2,935 0.14 0.11 0.31 2,972
Vendor 0.21 0.06 2.50 1.30 0.02 0.03 0.13 0.16 0.03 0.05 0.08 —2,161 2,161 0.17 0.33 0.16 2,262
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker 0.35 0.31 0.39 4.60 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 —973 973 0.05 0.04 1.68 986
Vendor 0.07 0.02 0.82 0.42 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.05 0.01 0.02 0.03 —706 706 0.05 0.11 0.86 740
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Worker 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 —161 161 0.01 0.01 0.28 163
Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.15 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —117 117 0.01 0.02 0.14 123
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.11. Paving (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Onsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.95 0.80 7.45 9.98 0.01 0.35 —0.35 0.32 —0.32 —1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 —1,517
Paving —0.24 ————————————————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
21 / 52
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Off-Road
Equipment
0.95 0.80 7.45 9.98 0.01 0.35 —0.35 0.32 —0.32 —1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 —1,517
Paving —0.24 ————————————————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.23 0.20 1.84 2.46 < 0.005 0.09 —0.09 0.08 —0.08 —373 373 0.02 < 0.005 —374
Paving —0.06 ————————————————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.04 0.04 0.34 0.45 < 0.005 0.02 —0.02 0.01 —0.01 —61.7 61.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 —61.9
Paving —0.01 ————————————————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.07 1.17 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 —211 211 0.01 0.01 0.78 215
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 —194 194 0.01 0.01 0.02 196
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
22 / 52
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.23 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 —48.5 48.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 49.1
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 —8.02 8.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 8.14
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.13. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Onsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.21 0.17 1.18 1.52 < 0.005 0.04 —0.04 0.03 —0.03 —178 178 0.01 < 0.005 —179
Architect
ural
Coatings
—44.3 ————————————————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.21 0.17 1.18 1.52 < 0.005 0.04 —0.04 0.03 —0.03 —178 178 0.01 < 0.005 —179
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
23 / 52
Architect
Coatings
—44.3 ————————————————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.03 0.03 0.19 0.25 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —29.3 29.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 —29.4
Architect
ural
Coatings
—7.29 ————————————————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment
0.01 0.01 0.04 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —4.85 4.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 —4.86
Architect
ural
Coatings
—1.33 ————————————————
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.23 0.21 0.20 3.54 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 —640 640 0.03 0.02 2.37 650
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.22 0.20 0.22 2.67 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 —587 587 0.03 0.02 0.06 594
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
24 / 52
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 —97.8 97.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.17 99.2
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 —16.2 16.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 16.4
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4. Operations Emissions Details
4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use
4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
2.13 2.01 0.80 14.1 0.03 0.01 0.12 0.13 0.01 0.04 0.05 —2,626 2,626 0.14 0.09 9.23 2,664
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
25 / 52
User
Defined
Industrial
3.00 0.68 30.1 17.1 0.26 0.42 2.21 2.64 0.41 0.72 1.12 —28,455 28,455 2.24 4.26 83.6 29,865
Total 5.12 2.69 30.9 31.2 0.28 0.44 2.33 2.77 0.42 0.75 1.17 —31,081 31,081 2.38 4.35 92.8 32,530
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
2.01 1.89 0.88 12.2 0.02 0.01 0.12 0.13 0.01 0.04 0.05 —2,423 2,423 0.15 0.09 0.24 2,454
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
2.97 0.66 31.5 17.1 0.26 0.42 2.21 2.64 0.41 0.72 1.12 —28,461 28,461 2.24 4.27 2.17 29,790
Total 4.99 2.55 32.4 29.3 0.28 0.44 2.33 2.77 0.42 0.75 1.17 —30,884 30,884 2.39 4.36 2.41 32,244
Annual ——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
0.27 0.25 0.12 1.69 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 —297 297 0.02 0.01 0.48 302
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
0.40 0.09 4.25 2.28 0.03 0.06 0.30 0.35 0.05 0.10 0.15 —3,447 3,447 0.27 0.52 4.37 3,613
Total 0.66 0.34 4.37 3.97 0.04 0.06 0.31 0.37 0.06 0.10 0.16 —3,745 3,745 0.29 0.53 4.86 3,914
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
26 / 52
4.2. Energy
4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
————————————2,386 2,386 0.23 0.03 —2,400
Parking
Lot
————————————130 130 0.01 < 0.005 —131
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
————————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
————————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ————————————2,516 2,516 0.24 0.03 —2,530
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
————————————2,386 2,386 0.23 0.03 —2,400
Parking
Lot
————————————130 130 0.01 < 0.005 —131
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
27 / 52
0.00—0.000.000.000.00————————————Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
User
Defined
Industrial
————————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ————————————2,516 2,516 0.24 0.03 —2,530
Annual ——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
————————————395 395 0.04 < 0.005 —397
Parking
Lot
————————————21.5 21.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 —21.6
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
————————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
————————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ————————————417 417 0.04 < 0.005 —419
4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
28 / 52
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Annual ——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
29 / 52
0.00—0.000.000.000.00—0.00—0.000.00—0.000.000.000.000.000.00Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
User
Defined
Industrial
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
4.3. Area Emissions by Source
4.3.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Architect
ural
Coatings
—45.8 ————————————————
Consum
er
Products
—11.6 ————————————————
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt
4.18 3.86 0.20 23.5 < 0.005 0.03 —0.03 0.04 —0.04 —96.7 96.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 —97.1
Total 4.18 61.2 0.20 23.5 < 0.005 0.03 —0.03 0.04 —0.04 —96.7 96.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 —97.1
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Architect
ural
Coatings
—45.8 ————————————————
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
30 / 52
————————————————11.6—Consum
er
Total —57.4 ————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Architect
ural
Coatings
—1.59 ————————————————
Consum
er
Products
—2.12 ————————————————
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt
0.52 0.48 0.02 2.94 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 0.01 —0.01 —11.0 11.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 —11.0
Total 0.52 4.19 0.02 2.94 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 0.01 —0.01 —11.0 11.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 —11.0
4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use
4.4.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
———————————240 826 1,066 24.7 0.59 —1,859
Parking
Lot
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
31 / 52
0.00—0.000.000.000.000.00———————————Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
User
Defined
Industrial
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ———————————240 826 1,066 24.7 0.59 —1,859
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
———————————240 826 1,066 24.7 0.59 —1,859
Parking
Lot
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ———————————240 826 1,066 24.7 0.59 —1,859
Annual ——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
———————————39.7 137 176 4.08 0.10 —308
Parking
Lot
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
32 / 52
0.00—0.000.000.000.000.00———————————User
Defined
Industrial
Total ———————————39.7 137 176 4.08 0.10 —308
4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use
4.5.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
———————————274 0.00 274 27.4 0.00 —959
Parking
Lot
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ———————————274 0.00 274 27.4 0.00 —959
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
33 / 52
959—0.0027.42740.00274———————————Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
Parking
Lot
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ———————————274 0.00 274 27.4 0.00 —959
Annual ——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
———————————45.4 0.00 45.4 4.53 0.00 —159
Parking
Lot
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00
Total ———————————45.4 0.00 45.4 4.53 0.00 —159
4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use
4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
34 / 52
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type
4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
35 / 52
4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type
4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type
4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
36 / 52
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Vegetatio
n
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
37 / 52
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Total ——————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Total ——————————————————
4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Avoided ——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Remove
d
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
———————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Avoided ——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
38 / 52
——————————————————Remove
d
Subtotal ——————————————————
———————————————————
Annual ——————————————————
Avoided ——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
Remove
d
——————————————————
Subtotal ——————————————————
———————————————————
5. Activity Data
5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description
Demolition Demolition 1/1/2024 1/29/2024 5.00 20.0 —
Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/30/2024 3/11/2024 5.00 30.0 —
Grading Grading 3/12/2024 4/22/2024 5.00 30.0 —
Building Construction Building Construction 4/23/2024 6/16/2025 5.00 300 —
Paving Paving 2/11/2025 6/16/2025 5.00 90.0 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 3/25/2025 6/16/2025 5.00 60.0 —
5.2. Off-Road Equipment
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
39 / 52
5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor
Demolition Concrete/Industrial
Saws
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73
Demolition Excavators Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 367 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 367 0.40
Grading Excavators Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40
Grading Scrapers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 423 0.48
Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 6.00 8.00 82.0 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 14.0 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 6.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 46.0 0.45
Paving Pavers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 89.0 0.36
Paving Rollers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 37.0 0.48
Site Preparation Crawler Tractors Diesel Average 4.00 8.00 87.0 0.43
Grading Crawler Tractors Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 87.0 0.43
5.3. Construction Vehicles
5.3.1. Unmitigated
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
40 / 52
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix
Demolition ————
Demolition Worker 15.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Demolition Vendor 5.00 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Demolition Hauling 15.8 20.0 HHDT
Demolition Onsite truck ——HHDT
Site Preparation ————
Site Preparation Worker 17.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor 7.00 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck ——HHDT
Grading ————
Grading Worker 20.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor 7.00 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck ——HHDT
Building Construction ————
Building Construction Worker 227 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 70.0 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck ——HHDT
Paving ————
Paving Worker 15.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor 0.00 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck ——HHDT
Architectural Coating ————
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
41 / 52
Architectural Coating Worker 45.4 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor 0.00 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck ——HHDT
5.4. Vehicles
5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.
5.5. Architectural Coatings
Phase Name Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 827,649 275,883 21,834
5.6. Dust Mitigation
5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (cy)Material Exported (cy)Acres Graded (acres)Material Demolished (Building
Square Footage)
Acres Paved (acres)
Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 27,454 —
Site Preparation ——105 0.00 —
Grading ——120 0.00 —
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.35
5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied Frequency (per day)PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction
Water Exposed Area 3 74%74%
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
42 / 52
Water Demolished Area 2 36%36%
5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres)% Asphalt
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.00 0%
Parking Lot 3.56 100%
Other Asphalt Surfaces 4.79 100%
User Defined Industrial 0.00 0%
5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors
kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O
2024 0.00 349 0.03 < 0.005
2025 0.00 349 0.03 < 0.005
5.9. Operational Mobile Sources
5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
600 52.5 21.1 160,212 3,501 306 123 935,159
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
User Defined
Industrial
328 28.7 11.4 87,537 9,954 871 345 2,658,504
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
43 / 52
5.10. Operational Area Sources
5.10.1. Hearths
5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft)Non-Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
0 0.00 827,649 275,883 21,834
5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 250
5.11. Operational Energy Consumption
5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr)
Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr)CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr)
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail
2,498,021 349 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Parking Lot 135,997 349 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 349 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
User Defined Industrial 0.00 349 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
44 / 52
5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year)Outdoor Water (gal/year)
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 125,071,331 2,563,454
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00
User Defined Industrial 0.00 0.00
5.13. Operational Waste Generation
5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year)Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 508 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00
User Defined Industrial 0.00 0.00
5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment
5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg)Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced
5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
45 / 52
5.16. Stationary Sources
5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor
5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr)Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day)Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)
5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type
——
5.18. Vegetation
5.18.1. Land Use Change
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres
5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres
5.18.2. Sequestration
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
46 / 52
5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year)Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)
6. Climate Risk Detailed Report
6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG
emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.
Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 24.4 annual days of extreme heat
Extreme Precipitation 3.50 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm
Sea Level Rise 0.00 meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 6.13 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed
historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full
day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider different
increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four simulations make
different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature
possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 50 meters (m) by 50 m, or about 164 feet (ft) by 164 ft.
Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate,
vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make
different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature
possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score
Temperature and Extreme Heat 3 0 0 N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
47 / 52
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality 0 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest
exposure.
The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the
greatest ability to adapt.
The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.
6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score
Temperature and Extreme Heat 3 1 1 3
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2
Wildfire 1 1 1 2
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality 1 1 1 2
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest
exposure.
The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the
greatest ability to adapt.
The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.
6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
7. Health and Equity Details
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
48 / 52
7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.
Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 95.3
AQ-PM 93.5
AQ-DPM 78.3
Drinking Water 96.1
Lead Risk Housing 42.2
Pesticides 18.1
Toxic Releases 84.6
Traffic 79.6
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 82.7
Groundwater 14.3
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 94.4
Impaired Water Bodies 0.00
Solid Waste 87.1
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 44.4
Cardio-vascular 55.1
Low Birth Weights 20.3
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 73.4
Housing 26.7
Linguistic 34.6
Poverty 51.4
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
49 / 52
Unemployment 51.3
7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.
Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 46.27229565
Employed 32.144232
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 30.92518927
High school enrollment 27.47337354
Preschool enrollment 9.149236494
Transportation —
Auto Access 75.69613756
Active commuting 25.30476068
Social —
2-parent households 83.85730784
Voting 30.59155653
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 69.20313102
Park access 26.03618632
Retail density 30.7583729
Supermarket access 43.14128064
Tree canopy 6.390350314
Housing —
Homeownership 72.5009624
Housing habitability 80.9829334
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
50 / 52
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 33.8380598
Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 97.78005903
Uncrowded housing 24.76581548
Health Outcomes —
Insured adults 19.91530861
Arthritis 67.1
Asthma ER Admissions 64.4
High Blood Pressure 71.3
Cancer (excluding skin)74.5
Asthma 37.3
Coronary Heart Disease 66.7
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 53.7
Diagnosed Diabetes 40.6
Life Expectancy at Birth 53.2
Cognitively Disabled 21.0
Physically Disabled 18.0
Heart Attack ER Admissions 49.4
Mental Health Not Good 35.7
Chronic Kidney Disease 55.3
Obesity 33.9
Pedestrian Injuries 62.8
Physical Health Not Good 37.9
Stroke 58.2
Health Risk Behaviors —
Binge Drinking 36.9
Current Smoker 40.0
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 38.5
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
51 / 52
Climate Change Exposures —
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 32.5
Elderly 76.6
English Speaking 56.0
Foreign-born 61.6
Outdoor Workers 45.8
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 67.8
Traffic Density 81.5
Traffic Access 23.0
Other Indices —
Hardship 66.3
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 50.4
7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a)71.0
Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b)40.0
Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535)No
Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550)No
Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617)No
a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.
b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.
14581 Oleander and Santa Ana Detailed Report, 9/13/2022
52 / 52
7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.
7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health and Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.
8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Construction: Off-Road Equipment All equipment will operate for 8 hours per day. Equipment based on data provided by the Project
team.
Construction: Trips and VMT Vendor trips adjusted based on construction phase length
Construction: Architectural Coatings Rule 1113
Operations: Vehicle Data Vehicle data based on Project traffic study
Operations: Fleet Mix Fleet mix based on Project traffic study
Operations: Energy Use Project will not use natural gas
Operations: Refrigerants Project does not include cold storage
Construction: Construction Phases Construction schedule based on data provided by the Project team.
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
This page intentionally left blank
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
APPENDIX 4.2:
EMFAC2021
Source: EMFAC2021 (v1.0.2) Emissions Inventory
Region Type: Sub-Area
Region: San Bernardino (SC)
Calendar Year: 2024
Season: Annual
Vehicle Classification: EMFAC2007 Categories
Units: miles/day for CVMT and EVMT, trips/day for Trips, kWh/day for Energy Consumption, tons/day for Emissions, 1000 gallons/day for Fuel Consumption
Region endar Yehicle Catego Model Year Speed Fuel Population Total VMT Fuel_Consumption (1000 gal)Fuel_Consumption (gal)Total Fuel VMT Total VMT Miles per Gallon Vehicle Class
San Bernardino (SC)2024 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 5.565987525 200.7100937 0.053685222 53.68522156 320576.6084 200.7100937 1931561.832 6.03 HHDT
San Bernardino (SC)2024 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 14231.95658 1766161.303 294.8811952 294881.1952 1766161.303
San Bernardino (SC)2024 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 48.62871821 4853.771805 0 0 4853.771805
San Bernardino (SC)2024 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 2469.470738 160346.0479 25.64172796 25641.72796 160346.0479
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 459317.1397 20167734.04 678.0067332 678006.7332 689480.9135 20167734.04 21769357.53 31.57 LDA
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1047.589492 37687.90898 0.878080701 878.0807006 37687.90898
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 19287.2826 922159.8322 0 0 922159.8322
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 12500.45848 641775.7563 10.5960996 10596.0996 641775.7563
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 40725.35771 1412436.812 57.61437754 57614.37754 57660.77698 1412436.812 1417994.863 24.59 LDT1
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 10.72175816 158.8104429 0.006542477 6.542476778 158.8104429
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 58.29951204 2744.162081 0 0 2744.162081
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 51.79076029 2655.077851 0.039856963 39.85696305 2655.077851
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 192654.7494 7946861.936 328.2807397 328280.7397 330225.39 7946861.936 8092457.996 24.51 LDT2
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 520.896721 23279.78377 0.7022627 702.2627003 23279.78377
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 1199.246991 43242.4945 0 0 43242.4945
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 1594.625518 79073.78143 1.24238757 1242.38757 79073.78143
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 17179.49082 637558.6823 46.93129933 46931.29933 68120.12603 637558.6823 1077239.622 15.81 LHDT1
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 11382.09786 435758.4326 21.1888267 21188.8267 435758.4326
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 52.7403112 3922.506902 0 0 19386.27641 3922.506902 290170.8153 14.97 LHDT2
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2883.702401 102543.2335 8.523099836 8523.099836 102543.2335
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4825.532255 186665.6444 10.86317658 10863.17658 2946.367925 186665.6444 123685.0541 41.98 MCY
San Bernardino (SC)2024 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 13.65084178 961.9374735 0 0 300889.4492 961.9374735 6007732.23 19.97 MDV
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MCY Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 20751.92893 123685.0541 2.946367925 2946.367925 123685.0541
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 147141.1277 5830683.861 296.7902416 296790.2416 5830683.861
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1910.88318 77417.93798 3.254905083 3254.905083 77417.93798
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 1327.48959 47850.30724 0 0 7364.77817 47850.30724 42284.2868 5.74 MH
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 1028.690257 51780.12453 0.844302537 844.3025368 51780.12453
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MH Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 3401.970527 30215.87901 6.184856876 6184.856876 88813.34178 30215.87901 740808.1193 8.34 MHDT
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MH Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1336.39751 12068.40778 1.179921294 1179.921294 12068.40778
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1460.602089 78395.7093 15.05623591 15056.23591 78395.7093
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 14946.4736 650565.6856 72.65830331 72658.30331 650565.6856
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 46.13645649 2344.169726 0 0 5378.066575 2344.169726 33062.62008 6.15 OBUS
San Bernardino (SC)2024 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 195.6757264 9502.554663 1.098802564 1098.802564 9502.554663
San Bernardino (SC)2024 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 370.0192137 15806.92249 3.09514692 3095.14692 15806.92249
San Bernardino (SC)2024 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 210.5519789 15196.96791 2.055015596 2055.015596 4951.794465 15196.96791 31836.21175 6.43 SBUS
San Bernardino (SC)2024 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 0.809761934 65.22582716 0 0 65.22582716
San Bernardino (SC)2024 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 32.78528924 1993.503854 0.227904058 227.9040581 1993.503854
San Bernardino (SC)2024 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 297.8692006 14022.10243 1.564009513 1564.009513 14022.10243
San Bernardino (SC)2024 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 373.2941498 7747.295585 1.052431626 1052.431626 8263.421636 7747.295585 40123.45681 4.86 UBUS
San Bernardino (SC)2024 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 2.213199982 56.32019914 0 0 56.32019914
San Bernardino (SC)2024 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 398.7600331 10010.49353 2.335353326 2335.353326 10010.49353
San Bernardino (SC)2024 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 54.72012078 5253.853518 0.406450205 406.450205 5253.853518
San Bernardino (SC)2024 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4.556959009 449.8374364 0.043468777 43.46877693 449.8374364
San Bernardino (SC)2024 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 7.328344802 1111.359033 0 0 1111.359033
San Bernardino (SC)2024 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 243.3602145 33308.40682 7.813502654 7813.502654 33308.40682
Source: EMFAC2021 (v1.0.2) Emissions Inventory
Region Type: Sub-Area
Region: San Bernardino (SC)
Calendar Year: 2025
Season: Annual
Vehicle Classification: EMFAC2007 Categories
Units: miles/day for CVMT and EVMT, trips/day for Trips, kWh/day for Energy Consumption, tons/day for Emissions, 1000 gallons/day for Fuel Consumption
Region endar Yehicle Catego Model Year Speed Fuel Population Total VMT Fuel_Consumption Fuel_Consumption Total Fuel VMT Total VMT Miles per Gallon Vehicle Class
San Bernardino (SC)2025 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 3.869766832 177.2217014 0.044579975 44.57997511 322298.7048 177.2217014 1975659.248 6.13 HHDT
San Bernardino (SC)2025 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 14693.60242 1799109.244 296.221758 296221.758 1799109.244
San Bernardino (SC)2025 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 109.5985203 11409.19414 0 0 11409.19414
San Bernardino (SC)2025 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 2560.5176 164963.5875 26.0323668 26032.3668 164963.5875
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 457374.7047 20012363.19 659.2303928 659230.3928 671181.1368 20012363.19 21858504.21 32.57 LDA
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 986.5858319 34821.96021 0.803361461 803.3614609 34821.96021
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 22921.29943 1119595.112 0 0 1119595.112
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 13621.71468 691723.9558 11.14738256 11147.38256 691723.9558
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 39862.49619 1386010.237 55.44488475 55444.88475 55506.30461 1386010.237 1393998.156 25.11 LDT1
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 9.62153332 138.8700264 0.005712258 5.712257886 138.8700264
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 81.74409231 4029.090974 0 0 4029.090974
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 75.22656194 3819.958249 0.055707597 55.70759743 3819.958249
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 197589.8024 8156000.659 328.0141754 328014.1754 330196.8511 8156000.659 8333682.032 25.24 LDT2
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 559.2848358 24877.85405 0.732985994 732.9859937 24877.85405
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 1637.444663 58171.59292 0 0 58171.59292
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 1934.989022 94631.92591 1.449689627 1449.689627 94631.92591
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 16963.11371 633447.7463 45.45107153 45451.07153 66469.9942 633447.7463 1077884.454 16.22 LHDT1
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 11403.02981 434286.2222 21.01892267 21018.92267 434286.2222
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 147.3648902 10150.48537 0 0 10150.48537
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2823.949841 99825.11713 8.149183621 8149.183621 18984.07565 99825.11713 289811.7154 15.27 LHDT2
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4888.887446 187525.0486 10.83489203 10834.89203 187525.0486
San Bernardino (SC)2025 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 37.58571717 2461.549606 0 0 2461.549606
San Bernardino (SC)2025 MCY Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 20826.96994 123280.6812 2.925130919 2925.130919 2925.130919 123280.6812 123280.6812 42.15 MCY
San Bernardino (SC)2025 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 147056.3511 5833561.643 289.7409456 289740.9456 293881.6654 5833561.643 6036663.747 20.54 MDV
San Bernardino (SC)2025 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1906.902909 76374.47974 3.151065928 3151.065928 76374.47974
San Bernardino (SC)2025 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 1802.834782 63969.43971 0 0 63969.43971
San Bernardino (SC)2025 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 1256.812117 62758.18504 0.98965379 989.6537902 62758.18504
San Bernardino (SC)2025 MH Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 3227.585522 28520.15334 5.836852659 5836.852659 6997.412696 28520.15334 40386.16204 5.77 MH
San Bernardino (SC)2025 MH Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1329.243498 11866.0087 1.160560036 1160.560036 11866.0087
San Bernardino (SC)2025 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1427.423114 76828.767 14.58515666 14585.15666 88952.25214 76828.767 752323.1368 8.46 MHDT
San Bernardino (SC)2025 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 15347.54129 658670.5437 73.22420436 73224.20436 658670.5437
San Bernardino (SC)2025 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 133.1585562 6928.399641 0 0 6928.399641
San Bernardino (SC)2025 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 208.419151 9895.426472 1.142891124 1142.891124 9895.426472
San Bernardino (SC)2025 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 358.2884481 15030.55432 2.914537526 2914.537526 5188.582188 15030.55432 32494.86271 6.26 OBUS
San Bernardino (SC)2025 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 215.4704252 15216.87274 2.039111404 2039.111404 15216.87274
San Bernardino (SC)2025 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 1.990200949 157.0570869 0 0 157.0570869
San Bernardino (SC)2025 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 34.88313202 2090.378559 0.234933258 234.9332579 2090.378559
San Bernardino (SC)2025 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 300.4577721 14124.28621 1.57111818 1571.11818 4959.876607 14124.28621 31963.06277 6.44 SBUS
San Bernardino (SC)2025 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 363.8707141 7488.892183 1.014599014 1014.599014 7488.892183
San Bernardino (SC)2025 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 4.690534617 132.2929048 0 0 132.2929048
San Bernardino (SC)2025 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 411.4766102 10217.59148 2.374159413 2374.159413 10217.59148
San Bernardino (SC)2025 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 54.83056931 5264.458034 0.406547565 406.5475652 8275.384496 5264.458034 40204.44305 4.86 UBUS
San Bernardino (SC)2025 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4.529432466 447.4667714 0.043317656 43.31765633 447.4667714
San Bernardino (SC)2025 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 7.409987909 1124.502697 0 0 1124.502697
San Bernardino (SC)2025 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 243.8212922 33368.01555 7.825519274 7825.519274 33368.01555
Oleander & Santa Ana Avenue Warehouse Energy Analysis
14581-02 EA Report
This page intentionally left blank