HomeMy WebLinkAbout14387 Valley Boulevard - Final Environmental Impact Report Addendum to SWIP
ADDENDUM TO THE SOUTHWEST INDUSTRIAL PARK (SWIP)
SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
(STATE CLEARINGHOUSE #2009091089 )
14387 VALLEY BOULEVARD PROJECT
MASTER CASE NO. 22-061
Design Review No. 22-032
Riverside Fontana LLC
APN: 0234-211-30
Prepared For:
City of Fontana
8353 Sierra Avenue
Fontana, CA 92335
Prepared By:
EPD Solutions, Inc.
2355 Main Street Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92614
February 2023
This page intentionally left blank.
Table of Contents
SWIP Specific Plan Update i 14387 Valley Boulevard Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 Purpose of the Addendum ..................................................................................................................... 1
2 Description of Proposed Project ............................................................................................................ 4
2.1 Project Setting and Location ....................................................................................................... 4
2.2 Project Description ...................................................................................................................... 5
2.3 Project Approvals ........................................................................................................................ 7
3 SWIP Specific Plan Update Environmental Impact Analysis Summary ................................................ 20
4 14387 Valley boulevard Project Environmental Impact Analysis and Project Approvals .................... 22
4.1 Aesthetics .................................................................................................................................. 22
4.2 Agricultural and Forestry Resources ......................................................................................... 27
4.3 Air Quality ................................................................................................................................. 29
4.4 Biological Resources .................................................................................................................. 41
4.5 Cultural Resources .................................................................................................................... 47
4.6 Geology and Soils ...................................................................................................................... 54
4.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Climate Change) .......................................................................... 60
4.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ............................................................................................ 66
4.9 Hydrology and Water Quality ................................................................................................... 75
4.10 Land Use and Planning .............................................................................................................. 81
4.11 Mineral Resources .................................................................................................................... 83
4.12 Noise ......................................................................................................................................... 84
4.13 Population and Housing ............................................................................................................ 92
4.14 Public Services ........................................................................................................................... 94
4.15 Recreation ................................................................................................................................. 97
4.16 Transportation .......................................................................................................................... 99
4.17 Utilities and Service Systems .................................................................................................. 112
4.18 Wildfire.................................................................................................................................... 117
4.19 Energy ..................................................................................................................................... 119
4.20 Tribal Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................ 123
5 Determination of Appropriate CEQA Documentation ....................................................................... 126
6 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................................... 129
7 References .......................................................................................................................................... 130
Table of Contents
SWIP Specific Plan Update ii 14387 Valley Boulevard Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Regional Location ........................................................................................................................... 8
Figure 2: Local Vicinity ................................................................................................................................ 10
Figure 3: Aerial View ................................................................................................................................... 12
Figure 4: Conceptual Site Plan .................................................................................................................... 14
Figure 5: Elevations ..................................................................................................................................... 16
Figure 6: Conceptual Landscape Plan ......................................................................................................... 18
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Surrounding Existing Land Use and Zoning Designations ............................................................... 4
Table 2: Parking Summary ............................................................................................................................ 6
Table AQ-1: Proposed Project Construction Emissions (lbs/day) ............................................................... 33
Table AQ-2: Proposed Project Operational Emissions (lbs/day)................................................................. 34
Table AQ-3: Project Localized Construction Emissions (lbs/day)................................................................ 36
Source: Air Quality, Health Risk, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Report (Appendix B). ................... 37
Table AQ-4: Maximum Localized Operational Project Emissions ............................................................... 37
. 37
Table AQ-5: Unmitigated Health Risks from Project Construction to Off-Site Receptors .......................... 38
Source: Air Quality, Health Risk, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Report (Appendix B). ................... 38
Table AQ-6: Health Risks from Project Construction to Off-Site Receptors with Mitigation ..................... 38
Source: Air Quality, Health Risk, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Report (Appendix B). ................... 38
Table AQ-7 Health Risks from Project Operation to Off-Site Receptors ..................................................... 38
Source: Air Quality, Health Risk, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Report (Appendix B). ................... 38
Table GHG-1: Project Operational GHG Emissions ..................................................................................... 61
Source: Air Quality, Health Risk, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Imapct Report (Appendix B), CalEEMod
Summary Sheets for SWIP Buildout (Appendix C) .................................................................... 62
Table NOI-1: Potential Construction Noise Impacts at Nearest Receptors ................................................ 84
Table NOI-2: Daytime Exterior Noise Level Impacts ................................................................................... 86
Table NOI-3: Nighttime Exterior Noise Level Impacts ................................................................................ 86
Table NOI-4: Potential Construction Vibration Annoyance Impacts at Nearest Receptor ......................... 89
Table NOI-5: Potential Construction Vibration Damage Impacts at Nearest Receptor .............................. 90
Table TRA-1: Proposed Project Trip Generation ....................................................................................... 100
Table TRA-2: Approved SWIP Trip Generation ......................................................................................... 100
Table of Contents
SWIP Specific Plan Update iii 14387 Valley Boulevard Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Table E-1: Proposed Project Construction Energy Consumption Estimates ............................................. 119
Table E-2: Proposed Project Operational Energy Consumption ............................................................... 120
LIST OF APPENDICES
A. SWIP Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
B. Air Quality, Health Risk, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Report
C. CalEEMod Emissions Summary for SWIP Buildout
D. Cultural Resources Assessment
E. Geotechnical Investigation
F. Paleontological Resources Assessment
G. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
H. Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan Permit No. WQMP22-000034
I. Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis
J. Trip Generation Memorandum
K. VMT Screening Memorandum
L. Trip Distribution Graphics
M. Preliminary Hydrology and Drainage Report
Purpose of the Addendum
SWIP Specific Plan Update 1 14387 Valley Boulevard Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
1 PURPOSE OF THE ADDENDUM
This Addendum has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) (California Public Resources Code [PRC] Section 21000 et seq.); the CEQA Guidelines
(Title 14, California Code of Regulations [CCR] Section 15000 et seq.); and the rules, regulations, and
procedures for implementing CEQA as set forth by the City of Fontana (City). The City is the lead agency
under CEQA.
Section 15164(a) of the CEQA Guidelines states that “the lead agency or a responsible agency shall prepare
an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary, but none of the
conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred.”
Pursuant to Section 15162(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, a subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or
Negative Declaration is only required when:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous
EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a
substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
(2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is
undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to
the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity
of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been
known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as
complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
(A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or
negative declaration;
(B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the
previous EIR;
(C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be
feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but
the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or
(D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed
in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the
environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or
alternative.
The Southwest Industrial Park (SWIP) Specific Plan (Approved Project) was originally created by the City
on December 6, 1983 and was intended to develop the City’s industrial uses south of Interstate 10 (I-10).
The SWIP Specific Plan originally encompassed approximately 1,800 acres. Since the adoption of the SWIP
Specific Plan, changes had occurred within the general SWIP Specific Plan area based on market
conditions. Therefore, the City determined that the SWIP Specific Plan should be revised to update land
Purpose of the Addendum
SWIP Specific Plan Update 2 14387 Valley Boulevard Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
uses, regulations, and development standards (SWIP Specific Plan Update). In addition, the SWIP Specific
Plan Update would promote orderly and compatible growth in newly annexed areas as well as older
portions within the SWIP Specific Plan area.1
In 2005, the City of Fontana proposed the annexation of approximately 2,920.9 acres (4.6+/- square miles)
of unincorporated land within its sphere of influence. This annexation action concluded in 2007 and
included 32 separately identified unincorporated “islands.” Of these, seven were located within the
proposed boundaries of the SWIP Specific Plan. On May 8, 2012, the City adopted Resolution No. 2012-
035, certifying the Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the SWIP Specific Plan Update
and Annexation (Approved Project), State Clearinghouse (SCH) No. 2009091089, in compliance with CEQA
and the CEQA Guidelines.
The SWIP Specific Plan Update is a comprehensive policy and regulatory guidance document for the
private use and development of all properties within the SWIP Specific Plan Update area. By providing the
necessary regulatory and design guidance, the SWIP Specific Plan Update ensured that future
developments implement the goals and policies of the City of Fontana General Plan (General Plan). The
SWIP Specific Plan Update area, which is comprised of approximately 3,111 acres in the southwestern
portion of the City within San Bernardino County (County), includes nine land use districts. Within the
126.2 acre Speedway Industrial District (SID)2, the Approved Project FEIR analyzed a build-out that
included 1,778,446 square feet (SF) of new industrial development (with 31,508 SF of existing
development to remain in place), along with 762,191 SF of new commercial uses.
The City has received an application for the 14387 Valley Boulevard Project (Proposed Project) for the
development of approximately 4.7 acres of land located within the SID at 14387 Valley Boulevard,
southwest of the Valley Boulevard and Cherry Avenue intersection. Within the SWIP EIR, a total of
1,778,446 SF of new industrial development was analyzed within the SID. The SID allows for a maximum
floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.8 for industrial uses. As such, consistent with the overall square footage of new
industrial development assumed in the SID by the Program FEIR and with the 0.8 allowable FAR, the
existing baseline condition for this Addendum is assumed to include 163,785 SF of industrial uses and is
compared against the proposed 96,002 SF warehouse, inclusive of a 3,750 SF ground floor office and a
3,750 SF mezzanine, on the Proposed Project site. Development of the Proposed Project would be within
the 1,778,446 SF of industrial development within the SID of the SWIP.
The purpose of this Addendum is to analyze any potential differences between the impacts identified in
the Approved Project FEIR, and those that would be associated with development of the Proposed Project.
As identified above, pursuant to provisions of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the City is the “Lead Agency”
charged with the responsibility of deciding whether to approve development on the Proposed Project
site. As part of its decision-making process, the City is required to review and consider whether the
Proposed Project would create new significant impacts or more severe significant impacts than those
previously disclosed, analyzed and mitigated for in the Approved Project FEIR. Additional CEQA review
beyond this Addendum would only be triggered if the Proposed Project created new significant impacts
1 City of Fontana. 2011. Southwest Industrial Park (SWIP) Specific Plan Update and Annexation Public Review Draft Program Environmental
Impact Report.
2 City of Fontana. 2018. Southwest Industrial Park Specific Plan – Land Use Map.
https://www.fontana.org/DocumentCenter/View/29671/SWIP-Land-Use-Plan-Map (accessed November 10, 2022).
Purpose of the Addendum
SWIP Specific Plan Update 3 14387 Valley Boulevard Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
or more severe significant impacts than those disclosed, analyzed and mitigated for in the Approved
Project FEIR. New threshold guidelines do not constitute “new information” requiring additional
environmental review.3 CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(e) states that an Addendum is the appropriate
CEQA document for the Proposed Project, if the City finds that major revisions to the Approved Project
FEIR are not necessary and that none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling
for the preparation of Subsequent or Supplemental EIR (SEIR) are triggered.
As detailed herein, the Proposed Project would not result in any new significant impacts and/or more
severe impacts that were not disclosed, analyzed and mitigated for in the Approved Project FEIR. As
demonstrated in this Addendum, the potential impacts associated with the Proposed Project would either
be the same or less than those described in the Approved Project FEIR. In addition, there are no substantial
changes to the circumstances under which the Proposed Project would be undertaken that would result
in new or more severe environmental impacts than previously addressed in the Approved Project FEIR,
nor has any new information regarding the potential for new or more severe significant environmental
impacts been identified. Therefore, in accordance with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines4, this
Addendum to the previously certified Approved Project FEIR is the appropriate environmental
documentation for the Project. In taking action on any of the approvals, the decision-making body must
consider the whole of the data presented in the Approved Project FEIR and the previously adopted
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), as well as subsequently approved project-specific
CEQA addenda for the Proposed Project site, as augmented by this Addendum.
3 Concerned Dublin Citizens v. City of Dublin (2013) 214 Cal.App.4th 1301.
4 CEQA. (accessed December 2022).
Description of Proposed Project
SWIP Specific Plan Update 4 14387 Valley Boulevard Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
2 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT
2.1 Project Setting and Location
The Proposed Project is located within the southwest portion of the City of Fontana, at 14387 Valley
Boulevard, between Almond Avenue and Cherry Avenue. Regional access to the Project site is provided
by Interstate 10 (I-10) off the Cherry Avenue exit and Interstate 15 (I-15) off the Fourth Street exit. Local
access to the Project site is provided via Valley Boulevard. The Project site and surrounding area is shown
in Figure 1, Regional Location.
Existing Project Site
The Project site consists of one parcel encompassing approximately 4.7 acres. The site is identified by
Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 0234-211-30. The Project site is currently used by Great Dane Trailers as
a truck and trailer sales yard. The site is completely disturbed and is covered with gravel and a small
concrete slab containing an approximately 1,468 SF prefabricated office. The site also contains chain-link
fencing along the northern and southern property lines. The Project site is currently accessed from two
driveways along Valley Boulevard. The Project site’s existing conditions are shown in Figure 2, Local
Vicinity.
Existing Land Use and Zoning Designation of the Project Site
The Project site has a General Plan Land Use designation of Light Industrial (I-L) and a zoning designation
of Specific Plan (SP). The Project is within the Southwest Industrial Park Specific Plan (SWIP). Within the
SWIP, the Project site is designated as Speedway Industrial District (SID). As it relates to the proposed
Project, SID is intended to provide opportunities for a mixture of uses, including service commercial,
entertainment, small businesses, research and development, restaurants, and hospitality uses. Light
manufacturing and warehouse uses are permitted within the SID. The SWIP Program EIR analyzed buildout
of 1,778,446 SF of industrial and included 31,508 SF of existing development to remain in place within the
126.2 acres of SID. Based on the maximum FAR of 0.8 allowed by the SID development standards and
based on the maximum 1,778,446 SF of industrial uses analyzed in Program EIR for the SID, the Project
site is assumed to allow up to 163,786 SF of industrial development.
Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning Designations
Land uses surrounding the Proposed Project site include light industrial uses and are described in Table 1
below.
Table 1: Surrounding Existing Land Use and Zoning Designations
Existing Land Use City General Plan
Designation
City Zoning
Designation SWIP Designation
North
Valley Boulevard
followed by truck
terminal facility
Light Industrial (I-L) and
Specific Plan (SP)
Southwest
Industrial Park
(SWIP)
Speedway Industrial
District (SID)
West Used truck dealer Light Industrial (I-L) and
Specific Plan (SP)
Southwest
Industrial Park
(SWIP)
Speedway Industrial
District (SID)
South
Under construction for
industrial commerce
use
Light Industrial (I-L) and
Specific Plan (SP)
Southwest
Industrial Park
(SWIP)
Speedway Industrial
District (SID)
Description of Proposed Project
SWIP Specific Plan Update 5 14387 Valley Boulevard Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Existing Land Use City General Plan
Designation
City Zoning
Designation SWIP Designation
East Truck dealer Light Industrial (I-L) and
Specific Plan (SP)
Southwest
Industrial Park
(SWIP)
Speedway Industrial
District (SID)
2.2 Project Description
The Proposed Project consists of demolition of the existing structures on the Proposed Project site and
construction of a new, approximately 96,002 SF concrete tilt-up warehouse facility with parking,
landscaping, and access improvements. The proposed building would result in a FAR of 0.47. The
conceptual site plan is provided as Figure 4, Conceptual Site Plan. The proposed warehouse building would
be single-story and a maximum of 45-feet in height. The proposed building would consist of 88,502 SF of
warehouse space, a 3,750 SF ground floor office and a 3,750 SF mezzanine. The Project also includes the
construction of associated parking, landscaping, and frontage improvements to serve the site.
As shown in Figure 5, Elevations, the Proposed Project would establish an architectural presence through
emphasis on building finish materials and consistent material usage and color scheme. The proposed
concrete tilt-up building would be grey and white with light grey and dark grey accents. Cutouts and
decorative window facades would be installed to create variety in scale and texture. The building would
be setback a minimum of 30-feet from Valley Boulevard and from the adjacent lots. Landscaping would
be provided in all setback areas. The proposed facility will include 11 dock doors and 1 grade level door
along the eastern side of the building, as well as 4 truck trailer stalls.
The Proposed Project would include 30-foot setbacks along the western boundary of the Proposed Project
site, consistent with the City’s Development Standards. The Project would be required to comply with City
Ordinance No. 1891 which includes additional requirements for all warehouse projects within the City
specifically pertaining to buffering and screening specifications, signage and traffic patterns, alternative
energy, and construction and operation.
The Proposed Project is consistent with the existing General Plan designation of Light Industrial and the
SWIP designation of SID, which allows for a mixture of uses, including service commercial, entertainment,
small businesses, research and development, restaurants, and hospitality uses. Light manufacturing and
warehouse uses are permitted within this zone district.
Access and Circulation
The Project would be accessible via two proposed 40-foot-wide driveways off Valley Boulevard. The
western driveway would allow ingress for both trucks, employees, and passenger vehicles. The eastern
driveway would allow egress for both trucks, employees, and passenger vehicles. Signage would be
posted onsite to dictate circulation of inbound and outbound trucks and vehicles. Internal circulation
will be via 30-foot drive aisles. Access to trailer stalls and loading dock areas would be controlled
through the use of swinging and sliding gates. Onsite circulation would be provided by one drive aisle
that circulates along the boundaries of the building.
Parking
A total of 42 passenger vehicle stalls, including 40 standard stalls and 2 accessible stalls, would be provided
in surface lots along the southern and eastern sides of the Project site. Proposed parking also includes 4
Description of Proposed Project
SWIP Specific Plan Update 6 14387 Valley Boulevard Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
trailer stalls located along the eastern side of the building in the truck court, which would meet the SWIP
SID standard as outlined in Table 2 below.
Table 2: Parking Summary
Required Spaces (SID) Provided Spaces
2 spaces/3 employees on
maximum working shift = 40
spaces
42 spaces
Landscaping
The Proposed Project would include landscaping that would cover 22,000 SF (22.7%), exceeding the City’s
requirement of 15%.
Infrastructure Improvements
Water and Sewer Improvements
The Project applicant would utilize the existing onsite water lines that connect to the existing 12-inch
diameter water line in Valley Boulevard, and the existing onsite sewer system would connect to the
existing sewer line in Valley Boulevard. The Project would include the construction of a 6-inch sewer
lateral to serve the site.
Drainage Improvements
The Project site’s runoff would be collected by catch basins and conveyed to an underground infiltration
system. The proposed underground stormwater chamber would be located in the southern portion of the
site, beneath the drive aisle. The existing 10-foot storm drain easement on the southern end of the Project
site would be utilized for overflow.
Street Improvements
The Project would install a new sidewalk, two feet in width, adjoining the existing sidewalk along the
Project’s Valley Boulevard frontage. The Project would include 5 feet of right of way dedication for Valley
Boulevard. The Project would also install new streetlights and upgrade the existing driveways to 40-foot-
wide driveways per City of Fontana Standard Plans.
Construction
Construction activities for the Project would occur over one phase and include demolition, site
preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coatings. Grading work of soils is
expected to result in cut of 670 cubic yards (CY) and fill of 13,030 CY of soils for a net soil import of 12,360
CY. Construction is expected to start on May 1, 2023 and occur over 10 months. Construction would occur
within the hours allowable by the Fontana Municipal Code Section 18.63, which states that construction
Description of Proposed Project
SWIP Specific Plan Update 7 14387 Valley Boulevard Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
shall occur only between the hours of 7:00 AM and 6:00 PM on weekdays and between the hours of 8:00
AM and 5:00 PM on Saturdays.
Operation
The Project would maintain and operate an industrial warehouse facility and is expected to operate 24/7.
Typical operational characteristics include employees traveling to and from the site, delivery of materials
and supplies to the site, truck loading and unloading, and distribution.
2.3 Project Approvals
The City is the Lead Agency as set forth in CEQA Section 21067 and is responsible for reviewing and
approving the Addendum to the SWIP Specific Plan FEIR. In addition to this Addendum, the City will
consider the following discretionary approvals for the Proposed Project:
• A Design Review permit for the proposed site and building improvements.
Figure 114387 Valley Blvd
City of Fontana
Regional Location
Description of Proposed Project
SWIP Specific Plan Update 9 14387 Valley Boulevard Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
This page intentionally left blank.
Local Vicinity
Figure 214387 Valley Blvd
City of Fontana
Description of Proposed Project
SWIP Specific Plan Update 11 14387 Valley Boulevard Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
This page intentionally left blank.
Aerial View
Figure 314387 Valley Blvd
City of Fontana
Description of Proposed Project
SWIP Specific Plan Update 13 14387 Valley Boulevard Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
This page intentionally left blank.
14387 Valley BlvdCity of FontanaFigure 4Conceptual Site Plan················································
Description of Proposed Project
SWIP Specific Plan Update 15 14387 Valley Boulevard Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
This page intentionally left blank.
14387 Valley BlvdCity of FontanaFigure 5Elevations42’-6”43’-0”
43’-0”
39’-6”
Description of Proposed Project
SWIP Specific Plan Update 17 14387 Valley Boulevard Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
This page intentionally left blank.
14387 Valley BlvdCity of FontanaFigure 6Conceptual Landscape Plan1BUILDING VALLEY BOULEVARDCR.O.W.TRUCK YARDBADEEP.L.P.L.P.L.23456778910111112121213MECHANICAL & ELECTRICALEQUIPMENT TO SCREENED WITHEVERGREEN SCREEN SHRUBS. 5GAL. SIZE MINIMUM 36" O.C. SUCH ASLIGUSTRUM TEXANUM, TEXASPRIVET14 TREES SYMBOL TREE NAMEQTY.WUCOLSPROPOSED STREET TREE ALONG VALLEY BLVD.PLATANUS X ACERIFOLIA 'BLOODGOOD
', LONDON PLANE TREE24" BOX SIZE.4MFLOWERING ACCENT TREE AT ENTRY DRIVESCERCIDIUM X. 'DESERT MUSEUM', BLUE PALO VERDE36" BOX SIZE.8LFLOWERING ACCENT TREE AT BUILDING ENTRIESLAGERSTROEMIA INDICA, CRAPE MYRTLE36" BOX SIZE.4MEVERGREEN SCREEN TREES-GEIJERIA PARVIFLORA, AUSTRALIAN WILLOW-QUERCUS ILEX, HOLLY OAK15 GAL. SIZE.44MLVERTICAL FROWING TREE ADJACENT TO BUILDING-ACACIA STENOPHYLLA, SHOE STRING ACACIA-PINUS ELDARICA, MONDELL PINE-TRISTANIA CONFERTA, BRISBANE BOX24" BOX SIZE.31LLMBACKGROUND TREECHITALPA X TASHKENTENSIS, CHITALPA24" BOX SIZE.5LPARKING LOT SHADE TREE-CUPANIOPSIS ANACARDIOIDES, CARROTWOOD TREE-QUERCUS ILEX, HOLLY OAK24" BOX SIZE.6MLPLANTING LEGEND SHRUBS SYMBOL NAMEWUCOLSDODONAEA V. 'PURPUREA', PURPLE HOPSEED BUSH5 GAL. SIZE.LWESTRINGIA FRUTICOSA, COAST ROSEMARY5 GAL. SIZE.LLIGUSTRUM TEXANUM, TEXAS PRIVET5 GAL. SIZE.LLEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESCENS, TEXAS RANGER5 GAL. SIZE.LCALLISTEMON 'LITTLE JOHN
', DWARF BOTTLE BRUSH5 GAL. SIZE.L GROUND COVERS SYMBOL NAMEWUCOLSROSMARINUS O. 'PROSTRATUS', PROSTRATE ROSEMARY1 GAL @ 24" O.C.LLANTANA CAMARA 'DWARF GOLD', DWARF LANTANA1 GAL SIZE @ 30" O.C.LSALVIA 'BEE'S BLISS', BEE
'S BLISS SAGE1 GAL @ 36" O.C.LMUHLENBERGIA RIGENS, DEER GRASS1 GAL @ 42" O.C.MSALVIA CLEVLANDII, CLEVELAND SAGE5 GAL @ 48" O.C.LDIANELLA TASMANICA 'VARIEGATA', WHITE STRIPED TASMAN FLAX LILY1 GAL @ 24" O.C.MNOTE: APPLY A 3" MIN. LAYER OF MULCH TOP DRESSING WITHIN ALL PLANTING AREAS. A SAMPLE IS REQUIREDPRIOR TO APPLICATION.1.NEW STREET PER TREE LEGEND.2.DROUGHT TOLERANT SHRUB AND GROUND COVER PERPLANTING LEGEND.3.PROPOSED FLOWERING ACCENT TREE PER PLANTINGLEGEND.4.PROPOSED PARKING LOT SHADE TREE PER PLANTINGLEGEND.5.FOUNDATION SHRUB ALONG BUILDING PER LEGEND.6.EVERGREEN SCREEN SHRUB ALONG PROPERTY PERLEGEND.7.VERTICAL TREE ALONG BUILDING FACADE PER TREELEGEND.8.EVERGREEN SCREEN TREE ALONG PROPERTY LINE PERTREE LEGEND.9.ALL TREE LOCATED 3' OR LESS TO CURB, WALKWAY ORWALL SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH DEEP ROOT BARRIERPANELS. 18" MIN. DEPTH X 10' WIDE PANEL.10.ALLOW FOR 24" CLEARANCE FROM BACK OF CURB TOSHRUB. PROVIDE MULCH BETWEEN BACK OR CURB ANDSHRUB.11.3" LAYER OF CRUSHED ROCK OVER WEED FILTER FABRIC.12.ENHANCED PAVING AT VEHICULAR AND BUILDING ENTRYAREAS. INTEGRAL COLORED PAVING WITH LIGHT ETCHFINISH.13.D.G. POCKETS WITH SUCCULENTS.14.LANDSCAPE EARTH BERMS WITH SMOOTH GRADES, 3:1MAXIMUM SLOPE.DESIGN KEY NOTES:A.TRANSFORMER PER ELEC. PLANS.B.TRASH ENCLOSURE PER ARCHITECTURALPLANS.C.PROPOSED FENCE PER ARCHITECTURALPLANS.D.BIKE RACK PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.E.GATE PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.REFRENCE KEY NOTES:SCOTT PETERSON LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, INC.2883 VIA RANCHEROS WAYFALLBROOK, CA 92028PH: 760-842-8993SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"030'60'90'NORTHDATE: 10-06-202214387 VALLEY BOULEVARD WAREHOUSE BLDG.CITY OF FONTANA, CACONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLANL-1WUCOLS PLANT FACTORTHIS PROJECT IS LOCATED IN 'WUCOLS'REGION '4-SOUTH INLAND'.H = HIGH WATER NEEDSM = MODERATE WATER NEEDSL = LOW WATER NEEDSVL= VERY LOW WATER NEEDS·SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1 SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH EROSION CONTROL GROUNDCOVER PER LEGEND, AND MULCH MATERIAL WITH 'BINDER' MATERIAL SHALL BEAPPLIED FOR EROSION CONTROL.·ROCK RIP-RAP MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED WHERE DRAIN LINES CONNECT TOINFILTRATION AREAS.·ALL UTILITY EQUIPMENT SUCH AS BACKFLOW UNITS, FIRE DETECTOR CHECKS, FIRECHECK VALVE, AND AIRCONDITIONING UNITS WILL BE SCREENED WITH EVERGREEN PLANT MATERIAL ONCEFINAL LOCATIONS HAVEBEEN DETERMINED.GENERAL NOTES:THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPEPLAN. IT IS BASED ON PRELIMINARYINFORMATION WHICH IS NOT FULLYVERIFIED AND MAY BE INCOMPLETE. ITIS MEANT AS A COMPARATIVE AID INEXAMINING ALTERNATE DEVELOPMENTSTRATEGIES AND ANY QUANTITIESINDICATED ARE SUBJECT TO REVISIONAS MORE RELIABLE INFORMATIONBECOMES AVAILABLE.IRRIGATION NOTE:THE PROJECT WILL BE EQUIPPED WITH A LOWFLOW IRRIGATION SYSTEM CONSISTING OF ETWEATHER BASED SMART CONTROLLER, LOWFLOW ROTORS, BUBBLER AND/ OR DRIPSYSTEMS USED THROUGHOUT. THE IRRIGATIONWATER EFFICIENCY WILL MEET OR SURPASS THECURRENT STATE MANDATED AB-1881 WATERORDINANCE.CONCEPTUAL PLAN NOTE:8811 Research Drive,Suite 200,Irvine, CA 92618T 949 474 1775www.GAAarchitects.comTOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA = 24,009 SQ. FT.LANDSCAPE DATAREQUIRED TREE QUANTITY MATRIX·TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS = 40 STALLS·TOTAL NUMBER OF TREESS REQUIRED AT 1 TREE PER 4 STALLS 40 / 4 = 10 TREES·TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES PROVIDED = 12 TREES1BUILDINGVALLEY BOULEVARDCR.O.W.TRUCK YARDBADEEP.L.P.L.P.L.23456778910111112121213MECHANICAL & ELECTRICALEQUIPMENT TO SCREENED WITHEVERGREEN SCREEN SHRUBS. 5GAL. SIZE MINIMUM 36" O.C. SUCH ASLIGUSTRUM TEXANUM, TEXASPRIVET14 TREES SYMBOL TREE NAMEQTY.WUCOLSPROPOSED STREET TREE ALONG VALLEY BLVD.PLATANUS X ACERIFOLIA 'BLOODGOOD', LONDON PLANE TREE24" BOX SIZE.4MFLOWERING ACCENT TREE AT ENTRY DRIVESCERCIDIUM X. 'DESERT MUSEUM', BLUE PALO VERDE36" BOX SIZE.8LFLOWERING ACCENT TREE AT BUILDING ENTRIESLAGERSTROEMIA INDICA, CRAPE MYRTLE36" BOX SIZE.4MEVERGREEN SCREEN TREES-GEIJERIA PARVIFLORA, AUSTRALIAN WILLOW-QUERCUS ILEX, HOLLY OAK15 GAL. SIZE.44MLVERTICAL FROWING TREE ADJACENT TO BUILDING-ACACIA STENOPHYLLA, SHOE STRING ACACIA-PINUS ELDARICA, MONDELL PINE-TRISTANIA CONFERTA, BRISBANE BOX24" BOX SIZE.31LLMBACKGROUND TREECHITALPA X TASHKENTENSIS, CHITALPA24" BOX SIZE.5LPARKING LOT SHADE TREE-CUPANIOPSIS ANACARDIOIDES, CARROTWOOD TREE-QUERCUS ILEX, HOLLY OAK24" BOX SIZE.6MLPLANTING LEGEND SHRUBS SYMBOL NAMEWUCOLSDODONAEA V. 'PURPUREA', PURPLE HOPSEED BUSH5 GAL. SIZE.LWESTRINGIA FRUTICOSA, COAST ROSEMARY5 GAL. SIZE.LLIGUSTRUM TEXANUM, TEXAS PRIVET5 GAL. SIZE.LLEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESCENS, TEXAS RANGER5 GAL. SIZE.LCALLISTEMON 'LITTLE JOHN', DWARF BOTTLE BRUSH5 GAL. SIZE.L GROUND COVERS SYMBOL NAMEWUCOLSROSMARINUS O. 'PROSTRATUS', PROSTRATE ROSEMARY1 GAL @ 24" O.C.LLANTANA CAMARA 'DWARF GOLD', DWARF LANTANA1 GAL SIZE @ 30" O.C.LSALVIA 'BEE'S BLISS', BEE'S BLISS SAGE1 GAL @ 36" O.C.LMUHLENBERGIA RIGENS, DEER GRASS1 GAL @ 42" O.C.MSALVIA CLEVLANDII, CLEVELAND SAGE5 GAL @ 48" O.C.LDIANELLA TASMANICA 'VARIEGATA', WHITE STRIPED TASMAN FLAX LILY1 GAL @ 24" O.C.MNOTE: APPLY A 3" MIN. LAYER OF MULCH TOP DRESSING WITHIN ALL PLANTING AREAS. A SAMPLE IS REQUIREDPRIOR TO APPLICATION.1.NEW STREET PER TREE LEGEND.2.DROUGHT TOLERANT SHRUB AND GROUND COVER PERPLANTING LEGEND.3.PROPOSED FLOWERING ACCENT TREE PER PLANTINGLEGEND.4.PROPOSED PARKING LOT SHADE TREE PER PLANTINGLEGEND.5.FOUNDATION SHRUB ALONG BUILDING PER LEGEND.6.EVERGREEN SCREEN SHRUB ALONG PROPERTY PERLEGEND.7.VERTICAL TREE ALONG BUILDING FACADE PER TREELEGEND.8.EVERGREEN SCREEN TREE ALONG PROPERTY LINE PERTREE LEGEND.9.ALL TREE LOCATED 3' OR LESS TO CURB, WALKWAY ORWALL SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH DEEP ROOT BARRIERPANELS. 18" MIN. DEPTH X 10' WIDE PANEL.10.ALLOW FOR 24" CLEARANCE FROM BACK OF CURB TOSHRUB. PROVIDE MULCH BETWEEN BACK OR CURB ANDSHRUB.11.3" LAYER OF CRUSHED ROCK OVER WEED FILTER FABRIC.12.ENHANCED PAVING AT VEHICULAR AND BUILDING ENTRYAREAS. INTEGRAL COLORED PAVING WITH LIGHT ETCHFINISH.13.D.G. POCKETS WITH SUCCULENTS.14.LANDSCAPE EARTH BERMS WITH SMOOTH GRADES, 3:1MAXIMUM SLOPE.DESIGN KEY NOTES:A.TRANSFORMER PER ELEC. PLANS.B.TRASH ENCLOSURE PER ARCHITECTURALPLANS.C.PROPOSED FENCE PER ARCHITECTURALPLANS.D.BIKE RACK PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.E.GATE PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.REFRENCE KEY NOTES:SCOTT PETERSON LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, INC.2883 VIA RANCHEROS WAYFALLBROOK, CA 92028PH: 760-842-8993SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"030'60'90'NORTHDATE: 10-06-202214387 VALLEY BOULEVARD WAREHOUSE BLDG.CITY OF FONTANA, CACONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLANL-1WUCOLS PLANT FACTORTHIS PROJECT IS LOCATED IN 'WUCOLS'REGION '4-SOUTH INLAND
'.H = HIGH WATER NEEDSM = MODERATE WATER NEEDSL = LOW WATER NEEDSVL= VERY LOW WATER NEEDS·SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1 SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH EROSION CONTROL GROUNDCOVER PER LEGEND, AND MULCH MATERIAL WITH 'BINDER' MATERIAL SHALL BEAPPLIED FOR EROSION CONTROL.·ROCK RIP-RAP MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED WHERE DRAIN LINES CONNECT TOINFILTRATION AREAS.·ALL UTILITY EQUIPMENT SUCH AS BACKFLOW UNITS, FIRE DETECTOR CHECKS, FIRECHECK VALVE, AND AIRCONDITIONING UNITS WILL BE SCREENED WITH EVERGREEN PLANT MATERIAL ONCEFINAL LOCATIONS HAVEBEEN DETERMINED.GENERAL NOTES:THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPEPLAN. IT IS BASED ON PRELIMINARYINFORMATION WHICH IS NOT FULLYVERIFIED AND MAY BE INCOMPLETE. ITIS MEANT AS A COMPARATIVE AID INEXAMINING ALTERNATE DEVELOPMENTSTRATEGIES AND ANY QUANTITIESINDICATED ARE SUBJECT TO REVISIONAS MORE RELIABLE INFORMATIONBECOMES AVAILABLE.IRRIGATION NOTE:THE PROJECT WILL BE EQUIPPED WITH A LOWFLOW IRRIGATION SYSTEM CONSISTING OF ETWEATHER BASED SMART CONTROLLER, LOWFLOW ROTORS, BUBBLER AND/ OR DRIPSYSTEMS USED THROUGHOUT. THE IRRIGATIONWATER EFFICIENCY WILL MEET OR SURPASS THECURRENT STATE MANDATED AB-1881 WATERORDINANCE.CONCEPTUAL PLAN NOTE:8811 Research Drive,Suite 200,Irvine, CA 92618T 949 474 1775www.GAAarchitects.comTOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA = 24,009 SQ. FT.LANDSCAPE DATAREQUIRED TREE QUANTITY MATRIX·TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS = 40 STALLS·TOTAL NUMBER OF TREESS REQUIRED AT 1 TREE PER 4 STALLS 40 / 4 = 10 TREES·TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES PROVIDED = 12 TREES
Description of Proposed Project
SWIP Specific Plan Update 19 14387 Valley Boulevard Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
This page intentionally left blank.
Environmental Impact Analysis Summary
SWIP Specific Plan Update 20 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
3 SWIP SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
SUMMARY
The environmental impact findings of the Approved Project FEIR are summarized below.
No Impact: The Approved Project FEIR determined that no impact would occur with respect to the
following environmental topic areas below. These impacts were included in the Approved Project FEIR’s
“Effects Found Not To Be Significant (EFNTBS)” section (Section 8.0).
• Agricultural and Forestry Resources (EFNTBS items 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d and 1e);
• Geology and Soils (EFNTBS items 3a-4 and 3e);
• Hazards and Hazardous Materials (EFNTBS items 4b and 4c);
• Hydrology and Water Quality (EFNTBS items 5g and 5j);
• Mineral Resources (EFNTBS items 6a and 6b);
• Noise (EFNTBS item 7a); and
• Traffic and Circulation (EFNTBS items 9a and 9b).
Less Than Significant Impact: The Approved Project FEIR identified less than significant impacts in the
following environmental topic areas:
• Aesthetics, Light and Glare (Impacts 4.1-2, 4.1-4 and 4.1-5);
• Air Quality and Climate Change (Impact 4.2-3);
• Cultural Resources (Impact 4.4-4);
• Hazards and Hazardous Materials (EFNTBS item 4a);
• Hydrology and Water Quality (EFNTBS items 5a, 5b, 5c, 5d, 5e, 5f, 5h, and 5i);
• Land Use and Planning (Impacts 4.6-1 and 4.6-2);
• Population and Housing (EFNTBS item 8a and 8b);
• Public Services, Utilities and Infrastructure (Impact 4.8-10); and
• Traffic and Circulation (Impacts 4.9-2 and 4.9-3).
Less Than Significant Impact with Incorporation of Mitigation: The Approved Project FEIR identified
impacts that could be mitigated to less than significant levels with incorporation of mitigation measures in
the following environmental topic areas:
• Aesthetics, Light and Glare (Impact 4.1-3);
• Air Quality and Climate Change (Impact 4.2-5);
• Biological Resources (Impacts 4.3-1, 4.3-2, 4.3-3 and 4.3-5);
• Cultural Resources (Impacts 4.4-1, 4.4-2 and 4.4-3);
• Hazards and Hazardous Materials (Impacts 4.5-1, 4.5-2, 4.5-3, 4.5-4, 4.5-5 and 4.5-6);
• Noise (Impacts 4.7-1 and 4.7-2); and
• Public Services, Utilities and Infrastructure (Impacts 4.8-1, 4.8-2, 4.8-3, 4.8-4, 4.8-6, 4.8-7, 4.8-8, and
Environmental Impact Analysis Summary
SWIP Specific Plan Update 21 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
4.8-9).
Significant and Unavoidable Impact: The Approved Project FEIR identified significant and unavoidable
impacts in the following environmental topic areas:
• Aesthetics, Light and Glare (Impact 4.1-1)
• Air Quality and Climate Change (Impacts 4.2-1, 4.2-2 and 4.2-4);
• Noise (Impact 4.7-3);
• Public Services, Utilities and Infrastructure (Impact 4.8-5); and
• Traffic and Circulation (Impact 4.9-1).
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 22 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
4 14387 VALLEY BOULEVARD PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
AND PROJECT APPROVALS
The scope of the City’s review of the Proposed Project is set forth in CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines. This
review is limited to evaluating the environmental effects associated with the Proposed Project when
compared to the Approved Project as set forth in the FEIR. This Addendum also reviews new information,
if any, of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of
reasonable due diligence at the time the Approved Project FEIR was certified. This evaluation includes a
determination as to whether the changes proposed for the Project would result in any new significant
impacts or more severe significant impacts.
Although CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 does not stipulate the format or content of an Addendum, the
topical areas identified in the City of Fontana Environmental Information Form5 were used as guidance
for this Addendum. In addition, Section 15164(e) of the CEQA Guidelines states that: “A brief explanation
of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 should be included in an
addendum to an EIR, the lead agency's findings on the Project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation
must be supported by substantial evidence.” This comparative analysis provides the City with the factual
basis for determining whether any changes in the Proposed Project, any changes in circumstances, or any
new information since the Approved Project FEIR was certified would require additional environmental
review or preparation of a SEIR.
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, the City has determined, on the basis of substantial evidence
in the light of the whole record, that implementation of the Proposed Project does not result in
substantial changes to the Approved Project, no substantial changes in circumstances have occurred
which would require major revisions to the Approved Project FEIR, and no new information of substantial
importance has been revealed since the certification of Approved Project FEIR that would result in either
new significant effects or an increase in the severity of previously analyzed significant effects.
A MMRP was adopted as a part of the Approved Project FEIR to mitigate impacts associated with
implementation of the Approved Project. The previously adopted mitigation measures applicable to the
Approved Project will be imposed as conditions of the Proposed Project, and the MMRP, as applicable to
the Approved Project, is contained in Appendix A.
4.1 Aesthetics
4.1.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The Approved Project FEIR concluded that although the Approved Project includes various design features
to minimize impacts to scenic vistas and would comply with existing local requirements, impacts related
to the buildout of future development associated with the SWIP Specific Plan Update area would remain
significant and unavoidable. The long-term buildout of industrial, commercial, and office uses throughout
the SWIP Specific Plan Update area would result in a significant alteration in views of the Jurupa
Mountains to the south and the San Gabriel/San Bernardino Mountains to the northwest. For this reason,
5 City of Fontana. ND. Environmental Information Form. https://www.fontana.org/DocumentCenter/View/2177/Environmental-Information-
Form-PDF (accessed April 15, 2021).
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 23 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
the Approved Project FEIR concluded that impacts to scenic vistas would remain significant and
unavoidable.
The Approved Project’s impacts associated with light/glare, scenic resources, and long-term visual
character were determined to be less than significant. Impacts associated with the short-term visual
character of the SWIP Specific Plan Update area were determined to be less than significant with
implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.1-3a.
4.1.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
No New or More Severe Impact: The Proposed Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on a
scenic vista. The dominant scenic views from the Proposed Project site and the surrounding area include
the San Gabriel Mountains to the northwest, the San Bernardino National Forest to the north, the San
Jacinto Mountains to the southeast, and the Jurupa Mountains to the south. The Proposed Project site is
located in the Speedway Industrial District (SID), which is described in the Approved Project FEIR as
intended to provide opportunities for a mixture of uses, including service commercial, entertainment,
small businesses, research and development, restaurants, and hospitality uses. According to the SWIP,
the SID encourages the use of auto-themed design elements to compliment the Speedway and create an
aesthetically cohesive district. In addition, design interface between varied uses and creating a welcoming,
energized environment are important to the SID. This area has been completely developed and urbanized.
Due to the proximity to the I-10, this area is occupied primarily by truck-related industrial uses. The
Proposed Project site is immediately surrounded by industrial and commercial uses to the north, south,
east, and west.
According to requirements within the SWIP Specific Plan Update, the maximum allowable structure height
within the SID is 60 feet. The existing building onsite is 45 feet tall. The proposed warehouse building
would be within the allowed height, at 43 feet in height; refer to Figure 5, Elevations. Because the
proposed building would be well below the allowed building height, the Proposed Project’s encroachment
into the viewshed would not be significant.
In addition, similar scale industrial uses are established within the immediate vicinity of the Proposed
Project site. Therefore, the change in views of the Proposed Project site from the surrounding area would
not cause a significant impact on a scenic vista. Thus, impacts are less than significant.
Accordingly, no new impacts relative to adverse effects on a scenic vista or a substantial increase in the
severity of a previously identified significant impact evaluated in the Approved FEIR would occur.
Additionally, no new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been
known at the time the Approved Project FEIR was certified is available that would impact the prior finding
of no significant impact.
Mitigation Program
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
None identified in the Approved Project FEIR.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 24 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impacts on a scenic vista(s). A significant and
unavoidable impact was identified in the Approved Project FEIR with respect to scenic vistas. The
Proposed Project would be designed consistent with the guidelines and standards within the SWIP Specific
Plan Update. Therefore, no new and/or modified mitigation measures are required for issues related to
aesthetics.
Threshold (b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway?
No New or More Severe Impact: The Approved Project FEIR determined that future development that is
consistent with the SWIP Specific Plan Update would not result in any adverse scenic resource impacts.
Therefore, no adverse impacts on scenic resources, including resources within a State scenic highway,
would result from the Proposed Project’s implementation.
The Proposed Project site consists of a fully paved lot used for truck storage (Great Dane Trailers Southern
California). The lot contains an approximately 1,468 SF office building and is fenced with a chain-link fence.
The site does not contain trees. Consistent with the Approved Project FEIR, there are no rock
outcroppings, or historic buildings within a State- or County-designated scenic highway, nor is there one
in the vicinity of the Proposed Project site.6 The area surrounding the Proposed Project site is fully
developed. No new impacts relative to adverse aesthetic impacts or a substantial increase in the severity
of a previously identified significant impact evaluated in the Approved Project FEIR would occur.
Additionally, no new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been
known at the time the Approved Project FEIR was certified is available that would impact the prior finding
of no significant impact.
Mitigation Program
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
None identified in the Approved Project FEIR.
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impact on a scenic resource(s). The Proposed
Project would be designed consistent with the guidelines and standards within the SWIP Specific Plan
Update. Therefore, no new and/or modified mitigation measures, outside of the General Plan goals and
policies and Fontana Municipal Code (Municipal Code) regulations, are required for issues related to
aesthetics.
Threshold (c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site
and its surroundings?
No New or More Severe Impact: The Proposed Project would redevelop the site from a truck dealer lot
to a warehouse. The Proposed Project site is surrounded by land zoned for industrial use with a General
6 Caltrans. 2019. Scenic Highways. https://dot.ca.gov/programs/design/lap-landscape-architecture-and-community-livability/lap-liv-i-scenic-
highways (accessed June 18, 2022).
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 25 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Plan land use designation of Light Industrial. The Project design would be consistent with the SWIP
development standards for the SWIP SID designation. Accordingly, no new impacts relative to adverse
aesthetic impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified significant impact
evaluated in the Approved Project FEIR would occur.
Mitigation Program
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
None identified in the Approved Project FEIR.
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impact on visual character or quality. The
Proposed Project would be designed consistent with the guidelines and standards within the SWIP Specific
Plan Update. Therefore, no new and/or modified mitigation measures are required for issues related to
aesthetics.
Threshold (d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?
No New or More Severe Impact: According to the land use and development regulations provided in the
SWIP Specific Plan Update, all future development would be required to comply with the lighting
requirements of the Municipal Code (Chapter 30), to reduce the potential for light and/or glare effects to
occur. In addition, outdoor lighting will not exceed 20 feet in height unless it has a light cutoff of 90
degrees or less, in which case a maximum height of 30 feet may be allowed.
Consistent with the Municipal Code and the Specific Plan Update development regulations, and as
applicable, all exterior lighting shall be adequately controlled and shielded to prevent glare and
undesirable illumination to adjacent properties or streets. Adequate lighting levels shall be provided to
ensure a safe environment, while not creating areas of intense light or glare. Light fixtures and poles shall
also be designed and placed in a manner consistent and compatible with overall site and building design,
and high-intensity security lighting fixtures shall not be substituted for site or landscape lighting or general
building exterior illumination but shall be limited to loading and storage locations or other similar service
areas. In addition, all lighting provided to illuminate parking areas or buildings shall be positioned so as to
direct light away from adjoining properties.
These regulations are considered to be either design measures or existing regulations pursuant to CEQA
standards. Incorporation of such features into the Proposed Project would ensure proper design,
installation, and operation of all exterior lighting, thereby reducing the potential for glare effects or light
spillover onto adjacent properties. As such, consistency with the Municipal Code and lighting
requirements of the SWIP Specific Plan Update would ensure that potential impacts associated with light
and glare would be less than significant. Consistent with the Approved Project FEIR, no mitigation
measures are required.
Accordingly, no new or more severe impacts relative to the significant and unavoidable light and glare
aesthetic impacts previously identified significant impact evaluated in the Approved Project FEIR would
occur. Additionally, no new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 26 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
been known at the time the Approved Project FEIR was certified is available that would impact the prior
finding of significant and unavoidable impacts.
Mitigation Program
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
None identified in the Approved Project FEIR.
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impact from light or glare. No significant
impacts associated with light and glare are identified in the Approved Project FEIR. The Proposed Project
would be designed consistent with the guidelines and standards within the Specific Plan Update.
Therefore, no new and/or modified mitigation measures are required for issues related to aesthetics.
Overall Aesthetics Impact Conclusion
With regard to CEQA Section 21166 and the CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), the Proposed Project
would not result in any new or more severe impacts with respect to aesthetics. Therefore, the preparation
of a SEIR is not warranted.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 27 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
4.2 Agricultural and Forestry Resources
4.2.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The Approved Project FEIR identified that implementation of the SWIP Specific Plan Update would not
impact or conflict with Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, a
Williamson Act contract, or with the conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of
forest land to non-forest use. As such, the Approved Project FEIR found that no impacts would occur, and
no mitigation measures were required.
4.2.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance
(Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use;
Threshold (b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract; and
Threshold (c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or
nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of
forest land to non-forest use?
No New Impact: According to the Approved Project FEIR, there is no Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland,
or Farmland of Statewide Important within SWIP Specific Plan Update boundaries. The only area where
these types of farmland occur are located within the northwestern portion of the City. The Proposed
Project site is designated as Urban and Built-Up Land.7 Thus, no impacts would occur related to Prime
Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance.
Lands within the SWIP Specific Plan Update area are designated as Single Family Residential (R-SF),
Residential Planned Community (R-PC), Public Facilities (P-PF), Community Commercial (C-C), General
Commercial (C-G), Regional Mixed Use (RMU), Light Industrial (I-L), and General Industrial (I-G). There are
currently no Williamson Act contracts for any parcels within the SWIP Specific Plan Update area.
Therefore, no impacts to existing agricultural zoning or Williamson Act Contracts are expected.
The Project site does not contain any forest land and is not surrounded by forest land. In addition, the
Project site is fully develoepd. Thus, development of the Proposed Project would not result in the
conversion of forest land to non-forest use.
Due to the location of the Proposed Project site and the lack of natural resources, including farmland, the
Proposed Project would not convert farmland to non-agricultural land. As such, no impacts related to the
loss of farmland would occur. Consistent with the Approved Project FEIR’s findings, no significant impacts
to agricultural resources would occur from Project implementation. No mitigation measures are
necessary.
7 Department of Conservation. 2022. California Important Farmland: 1984-2016. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/ciftimeseries/
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 28 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Mitigation Program
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
None identified in the Approved Project FEIR.
Overall Agricultural and Forestry Resources Impact Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impact to agricultural or forestry resources.
No significant impacts to agricultural resources are identified in the Approved Project FEIR. The Proposed
Project is located within the boundaries of the SWIP Specific Plan Update; therefore, no new and/or
considerably different mitigation measures are required for issues related to agricultural or forestry
resources.
With regard to CEQA Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), the changes proposed by the
Proposed Project would not result in any new or more severe impacts with respect to agricultural
resources. Therefore, preparation of a SEIR is not warranted.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 29 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
4.3 Air Quality
4.3.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The Approved Project FEIR concluded that implementation of the SWIP Specific Plan would result in
significant and unavoidable impacts relative to air quality for both short and long-term air quality as well
as consistency with the applicable Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). The Approved Project FEIR
concluded a less than significant impact related to carbon monoxide (CO) hotspots. Construction and
operational impacts associated with the Proposed Project relative to impacts identified in the Approved
Project FEIR were analyzed in Air Quality, Health Risk, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Report
(Appendix B).
4.3.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
No New or More Severe Impact: The Proposed Project site is located in the South Coast Air Basin (Basin)
which includes parts of San Bernardino, Los Angeles, and Riverside Counties and all of Orange County. The
South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and the California Air Resources Board (CARB)
monitor air quality within the Basin.
Air quality plans describe air pollution control strategies and measures to be implemented by a city,
county, region, and/or air district. The primary purpose of an air quality plan is to bring an area that does
not attain federal and State air quality standards into compliance with the requirements of the federal
Clean Air Act and California Clean Air Act. In addition, air quality plans are developed to ensure that an
area maintains a healthful level of air quality based on the National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) and the California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS). The AQMP is prepared by SCAQMD
and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). The AQMP provides policies and control
measures that reduce emissions to attain both State and federal ambient air quality standards.
According to the SCAQMD, a project is consistent with the AQMP if the project is consistent with
anticipated growth and would not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality
violations or cause or contribute to new violations or delay timely attainment of air quality standards or
the interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP. The SCAQMD’s CEQA Handbook, identifies two
key indicators of consistency with the AQMP:
1. Whether a project will result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality
violations or cause or contribute to new violations or delay timely attainment of air quality
standards or the interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP.
2. Whether a project will exceed the assumptions in the AQMP based on the year of project buildout
and phase.
The violations to which Consistency Criterion No. 1 refers are CAAQS and NAAQS. As shown in Table AQ-
1 and Table AQ-2, below and discussed further in Appendix B, the Proposed Project would not exceed the
short-term construction standards or long-term operational standards and would therefore not violate
any air quality standards. Thus, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the first criterion, and no
new impact would occur.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 30 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Concerning Consistency Criterion No. 2, the AQMP contains air pollutant reduction strategies based on
SCAG’s latest growth forecasts, and SCAG’s growth forecasts were defined in consultation with local
governments and with reference to local general plans and specific plans. The Proposed Project is
consistent with the land use designation and development density presented in the SWIP. The site is
within the SID which permits logistics and distribution facilities and warehouses. The maximum buildout
of the site based on the SID FAR of 0.8, would result in up to 163,786 SF of industrial development. The
Proposed Project would develop a 96,002 SF warehouse, inclusive of a 3,750 SF ground floor office and a
3,750 SF mezzanine; and therefore, would not exceed the anticipated buildout evaluated in the SWIP
Specific Plan Final EIR, and would not exceed the anticipated job growth projections used by the SCAQMD
to develop the AQMP. Thus, no new impact would occur.
The Approved Project FEIR identified impacts during construction as a significant and unavoidable impact
on air quality. Mitigation Measures 4.2-1a through 4.2-1f were identified in the FEIR to reduce air
emissions from implementation/development of the Approved Project.
The Approved Project FEIR identified air quality operational impacts associated with the buildout of the
SWIP Specific Plan as significant and unavoidable. Mitigation Measures 4.2-1a to 4.2-1f were identified as
measures that would reduce operational emissions to the extent feasible. The Proposed Project would be
required to implement the following mitigation measures from the Approved Project FEIR and would not
result in any new or greater impact than disclosed in the Approved Project FEIR. With implementation of
the following mitigation measures, Proposed Project impacts would be less than significant.
Mitigation Program
The Approved Project FEIR includes measures to reduce potential impacts associated with the
implementation of the SWIP Specific Plan Project. The following measures from the Approved Project FEIR
are applicable to the Proposed Project:
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
4.2-1a All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operation condition so as to
reduce emissions. The construction contractor shall ensure that all construction
equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per the manufacturer’s
specification. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City
verification.
4.2-1b Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, all applicants shall submit construction plans
to the City of Fontana denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use.
Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction
equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible
for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by
the SCAQMD as well as City Planning Staff.
4.2-1c All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD
Rule 1113.
4.2-1d Projects that result in the construction of more than 19 single-family residential units, 40
multifamily residential units, or 45,000 square feet of retail/commercial/industrial space
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 31 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
shall be required to apply paints either by hand or high-volume low pressure (HVLP) spray.
These measures may reduce volatile organic compounds (VOC) associated with the
application of paints and coatings by an estimated 60 to 75 percent. Alternatively, the
contractor may specify the use of low volatility paints and coatings. Several of currently
available primers have VOC contents of less than 0.85 pounds per gallon (e.g., dulux
professional exterior primer 100 percent acrylic). Top coats can be less than 0.07 pounds
per gallon (8 grams per liter) (e.g., Lifemaster 2000-series). This latter measure would
reduce these VOC emissions by more than 70 percent. Larger projects should incorporate
both the use of HVLP or hand application and the requirement for low volatility coatings.
4.2-1e All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108.
4.2-1f Prior to the issuance of grading permits or approval of grading plans for future
development projects within the project area, future developments shall include a dust
control plan as part of the construction contract standard specifications. The dust control
plan shall include measures to meet the requirements of SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403.
Such measures may include, but are not limited to, the following:
• Phase and schedule activities to avoid high-ozone days and first-stage smog alerts.
• Discontinue operation during second-stage smog alerts.
• All haul trucks shall be covered prior to leaving the site to prevent dust from impacting
the surrounding areas.
• Comply with AQMD Rule 403, particularly to minimize fugitive dust and noise to
surrounding areas.
• Moisten soil each day prior to commencing grading to depth of soil cut.
• Water exposed surfaces at least twice a day under calm conditions, and as often as
needed on windy days or during very dry weather in order to maintain a surface crust
and minimize the release of visible emissions from the construction site.
• Treat any area that will be exposed for extended periods with a soil conditioner to
stabilize soil or temporarily plant with vegetation.
• Wash mud-covered tires and under carriages of trucks leaving construction sites.
• Provide for street sweeping, as needed, on adjacent roadways to remove dirt
dropped by construction vehicles or mud, which would otherwise be carried off by
trucks departing project sites.
• Securely cover all loads of fill coming to the site with a tight-fitting tarp.
• Cease grading during periods when winds exceed 25 miles per hour.
• Provide for permanent sealing of all graded areas, as applicable, at the earliest
practicable time after soil disturbance.
• Use low-sulfur diesel fuel in all equipment.
• Use electric equipment whenever practicable.
• Shut off engines when not in use.
4.2-2a All “large-scale” (e.g., over 10 acres per day) project Applicants shall provide incentives to
use mass transit including the placement of bus stop shelters along major thoroughfares
if not so equipped. (City Staff shall determine what denotes a “large-scale” project.)
[This mitigation measure does not apply because the proposed Project is not “large scale”
as the site is not over 10 acres]
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 32 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
4.2-2b All “large-scale” (e.g., over 10 acres per day) project Applicants shall incorporate a
bike/walking path between these shelters, the proposed residential areas, and the
proposed commercial areas. These paths shall be lit and configured so as to avoid
potential conflict with roadways and railroad activities.
[This mitigation measure does not apply because the proposed Project is not “large scale”
as the site is not over 10 acres.]
4.2-2c All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be
left idling for prolonged periods pursuant to Title 13 of the California Code of Regulations,
Section 2485, which limits idle times to not more than five minutes.
4.2-2d The City shall require that both industrial and commercial uses designate preferential
parking for vanpools.
4.2-2e The proposed commercial and industrial areas shall incorporate food service.
4.2-2f All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to
post both bus and MetroLink schedules in conspicuous areas.
4.2-2g All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be requested
to configure their operating schedules around the MetroLink schedule to the extent
reasonably feasible.
4.2-2j All residential, commercial, and industrial structures shall be required to incorporate light
colored roofing materials.
4.2-2k Prior to approval of future development projects within the project area, the City of
Fontana shall conduct project‐level environmental review to determine potential vehicle
emission impacts associated with the project(s). Mitigation measures shall be developed
for each project as it is considered to mitigate potentially significant impacts to the extent
feasible. Potential mitigation measures may require that facilities with over 250
employees (full or part‐time employees at a worksite for a consecutive six‐month period
calculated as a monthly average), as required by the Air Quality Management Plan,
implement Transportation Demand Management (TDM) programs.
[This mitigation measure does not apply as the Proposed Project would generate only
about 80 employees.]
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impact pertaining to conflict with or
obstructing implementation of the AQMP. Mitigation Measures 4.2-1a to 4.2-1f and 4.2-2c through 4.2-
2g and 4.4-2j would reduce construction and operational emissions and the Proposed Project’s impacts
would be less than significant. However, the SWIP Approved Project area would remain significant and
unavoidable. The Proposed Project’s impacts would be consistent with development in the area and
would be in compliance with applicable AQMP measures. Therefore, no new or more severe impact
relative to air quality emissions from the previously identified significant and unavoidable impact
evaluated in the Approved Project FEIR would occur with implementation of the Project. Additionally, no
new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known at the
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 33 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
time the Approved Project FEIR was certified is available that would change the significance determination
in the Approved Project FEIR.
Threshold (b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the
project region is in non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air
quality standard?
Construction Emissions
No New or More Severe Impact: Emissions from the construction phase were estimated based on
information from the Applicant for construction equipment requirements and schedule. It is assumed
construction of the Proposed Project would occur over a period of approximately 10 months. Construction
activities would occur for eight hours per day, at least five days per week; sometimes six days if necessary.
Project construction activities would include demolition of existing onsite structures, grading, site
preparation, building, paving, and architectural coating activities. CalEEMod was used to calculate
expected pollutant emissions generated from the construction of the Proposed Project. Table AQ-1 below
displays the maximum daily emissions in pounds per day that are expected to be generated from the
construction of the Proposed Project in comparison to the daily thresholds established by the SCAQMD.
Table AQ-1: Proposed Project Construction Emissions (lbs/day)
Project Construction Maximum Pollutant Emissions
VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
Demolition 1.3 33.8 25.6 <0.1 1.3 1.0
Site Preparation 1.3 33.8 23.6 <0.1 10.0 5.5
Grading 1.4 40.5 23.6 0.1 6.4 3.1
Building Construction 1.3 24.6 20.4 <0.1 1.7 1.1
Architectural Coating 10.1 2.4 2.3 <0.1 0.2 0.1
Paving 1.0 16.1 14.2 <0.1 0.8 0.6
Maximum (lbs/day) 11.4 40.5 25.6 0.1 10.0 5.5
SCAQMD Thresholds 75.0 100.0 550.0 150.0 150.0 55.0
Exceeds? No No No No No No
CO = carbon monoxide; lbs/day = pounds per day; NOX = nitrogen oxides; PM2.5 = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in
size; PM10 = particulate matter less than 10 microns in size; SCAQMD = South Coast Air Quality Management District; SOX =
sulfur oxides; VOC = volatile organic compounds
Source: Air Quality, Health Risk, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Report (Appendix B).
As shown in Table AQ-1, construction emissions associated with the Proposed Project would not exceed
the SCAQMD thresholds for ROG, NOx, CO, sulfur oxides (SOx), PM2.5, or PM10 emissions. In addition,
the Proposed Project would be required to implement SWIP EIR MMs 4.2-1a through 4.2-1f, which would
further reduce construction-related emissions. Therefore, construction of the Proposed Project would not
result in emissions that would result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant
for which the Project is in nonattainment under an applicable federal or State ambient air quality
standard.
Operational Emissions
No New or More Severe Impact: Operational impacts are related to area source emissions, energy source
emissions, and mobile source emissions. Area source emissions are associated with landscape
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 34 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
maintenance activities and periodic architectural coatings, while energy-source emissions are associated
with natural gas and electricity consumption. Mobile sources from the daily vehicle trips constitute the
largest source of operational emissions. CalEEMod estimated emissions from the operation of the
Proposed Project and SWIP Buildout of the Proposed Project site are shown in Table AQ-2 below.
Table AQ-2: Proposed Project Operational Emissions (lbs/day)
Emission Type Maximum Pollutant Emissions
VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
Area Sources 2.2 <0.1 <0.1 0.0 <0.1 <0.1
Energy Sources <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Mobile Sources 0.6 3.0 6.5 <0.1 1.6 0.4
Total Project Emissions 2.8 3.1 6.5 <0.1 1.6 0.4
Approved SWIP
Buildout 4.7 5.2 11.1 <0.1 2.7 0.76
SCAQMD Thresholds 55.0 55.0 550.0 150.0 150.0 55.0
Significant? No No No No No No
Source: Air Quality, Health Risk, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Report (Appendix B), CalEEMod Summary Sheets for
SWIP Buildout (Appendix C)
As shown in Table AQ-2, the Project would not exceed the significance criteria for VOC, Nox, CO, SOx,
PM10, or PM2.5 emissions; thus, the Proposed Project would not have a significant effect on regional air
quality. In addition, the Proposed Project would result in fewer emissions than would occur under
maximum development of the site as allowed by the SID . In addition, the Proposed Project would be
required to implement SWIP EIR MMs 4.2-2c through 4.2-2l, which would further reduce operational
emissions. Therefore, no new impacts related to regional construction air quality emissions would occur
from implementation of the Proposed Project.
CalEEMod version 2020.4.0 was used to calculate average daily emissions for area source, energy source,
and mobile source emissions (Appendix B). Proposed Project-related emissions do not exceed the
SCAQMD’s established thresholds. Mitigation Measures 4.2-2a through 4.2-2g and 4.4-2j and 4.4-2k were
identified in the SWIP Final EIR to reduce operational emissions to the extent feasible. The Proposed
Project would be required to implement the mitigation measures from the Approved Project FEIR, but the
impact would remain significant and unavoidable.
Cumulative Emissions
No New or More Severe Impact: The regional analysis of construction and operational emissions
conducted for the Approved Project FEIR indicates that without mitigation, the SWIP Specific Plan Project
would exceed the SCAQMD regional significance thresholds for ROG, NOX, CO, PM-10, and PM-2.5.
Mitigation Measures 4.2-2a through 4.2-2g and 4.4-2j and 4.4-2k were identified within the Approved
Project FEIR that would reduce cumulative emissions to the extent feasible. However, the Approved
Project FEIR concluded that even with implementation of these mitigation measures, cumulative impacts
would be significant and unavoidable.
The Proposed Project’s emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD thresholds during both construction and
operations. Thus, the Proposed Project would not result in a new or greater impact than identified in the
Approved Project FEIR.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 35 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Mitigation Program
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
Mitigation Measures 4.2-1a to 4.2-1f are applicable for construction and 4.2-2a through 4.2-2g and 4.4-2j
and 4.4-2k are applicable for operations.
Conclusion
No new or more severe impacts from previously identified significant impacts evaluated in the Approved
Project FEIR would occur. Additionally, no new information of substantial importance that was not known
and could not have been known at the time the Approved Project FEIR was certified is available that would
impact the prior finding of no significant and unavoidable impact under this issue area.
Threshold (c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
No New or More Severe Impact: The CEQA Guidelines indicate that a potentially significant impact could
occur if a project would expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. The criteria
used in the Approved Project FEIR to address this impact included the preparation of a localized impact
traffic analysis and a CO hot spot analysis. CO concentrations would be well below the state and Federal
standards according to the Approved Project FEIR. In addition, the Approved Project FEIR concluded a less
than significant impact from CO hotspots. Therefore, the Proposed Project construction and operation
emissions were analyzed to assess localized significance thresholds (LSTs).The Basin is currently
considered a nonattainment area for the NAAQS for O3, PM-10, and PM-2.5. Although the Los Angeles
County portion of the Basin is designated a nonattainment area for the NAAQS for lead, all other portions
of the Basin (including San Bernardino County) is designated as in attainment (Appendix B). The Basin is
considered a nonattainment area for CAAQS for NO2, O3, and PM-10, and PM-2.5. Levels of PM-10 and
PM-2.5 are locally high enough that contributions from new sources may add to the concentrations of
those pollutants and contribute to a projected air quality violation. Two criteria are used to assess the
significance of this impact: (1) the localized significance analysis; and (2) the CO hot spots analysis.
The localized significance analysis in the FEIR demonstrated that the Approved Project would exceed the
localized thresholds for ROG, NOx, CO, PM-10, and PM-2.5.
Localized Mobile Source Impacts - CO Hot Spot Analysis
The Proposed Project is anticipated to generate 16 AM peak hour trips and 17 PM peak hour trips. Based
on the analysis presented below, a CO “hot spots” analysis is not needed to determine whether the change
in the level of service (LOS) at an intersection would have the potential to result in exceedances of the
CAAQS or NAAQS. An adverse CO concentration, known as a “hot spot,” would occur if an exceedance of
the state one-hour standard of 20 parts per million (ppm) or the eight-hour standard of 9 ppm were to
occur. At the time of the 1993 Handbook8, the SCAG was designated nonattainment under the CAAQS
and NAAQS for CO. It has long been recognized that CO hotspots are caused by vehicular emissions,
primarily when idling at congested intersections. However, vehicle emissions standards have become
increasingly stringent in the last twenty years. Currently, the allowable CO emissions standard in California
is a maximum of 3.4 grams/mile for passenger cars (there are requirements for certain vehicles that are
8 SCAQMD is in the process of developing an “Air Quality Analysis Guidance Handbook” to replace the 1993 Handbook. Refer to
http://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules-compliance/ceqa/air-quality-analysis-handbook for updated sections.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 36 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
more stringent). With the turnover of older vehicles, introduction of cleaner fuels and implementation of
increasingly sophisticated and efficient emissions control technologies, CO concentration in the Basin is
now designated as attainment. Also, CO concentrations in the Proposed Project vicinity have steadily
declined.
Similar considerations are also employed by other Air Districts when evaluating potential CO
concentration impacts. More specifically, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD)
concludes that under existing and future vehicle emission rates, a given project would have to increase
traffic volumes at a single intersection by more than 44,000 vehicles per hour or 24,000 vehicles per hour
where vertical and/or horizontal air does not mix to generate a significant CO impact. A trip generation
was prepared for the Proposed Project and the Proposed Project would generate 16 AM peak hour trips
and 17 PM peak hour trips. This would not produce the volume of traffic required to generate a CO “hot
spot”. Therefore, CO “hot spots” are not an environmental impact of concern for the Proposed Project.
Localized air quality impacts related to mobile-source emissions would therefore be less than significant.
Localized Significance Threshold
The SCAQMD’s Localized Significance Threshold (LST) methodology (2008) was used to analyze the
neighborhood scale impacts of NOX, CO, PM-10, and PM-2.5 associated with Project-specific mass
emissions. Introduced in 2003, the LST methodology was revised in 2008 to include the PM-2.5
significance threshold methodology and update the LST mass rate lookup tables for the new 1-hour NO2
standard.
For determining localized air quality impacts from small projects in a defined geographic Source Receptor
Area (SRA), the LST methodology provides mass emission rate lookup tables for 1-acre, 2-acre, and 5-acre
parcels by SRA. During construction, the maximum disturbed area serves to determine the LSTs’ project
size value for construction. The maximum daily area disturbed during construction is 3.5 acres during the
site grading activity. Therefore, the analysis set the maximum daily disturbed area during construction as
3.5 acres for the localized assessment of construction impacts.
For most projects, the highest daily emission rates occur during the site preparation and grading phases
of construction due to the use of heavy earthmoving equipment. The Proposed Project site is in SRA Zone
34, the Central San Bernardino Valley. In addition, sensitive receptors were assumed to be at 340 feet
from construction area to provide for a conservative analysis of potential impacts.
Project construction and operation emissions were compared to the LST screening tables in SRA 34, based
on a 104-meter source-receptor distance and a disturbed acreage of 3.5 acres.
As shown in Table AQ-3 and AQ-4 below, the Proposed Project’s localized construction and operational
emissions would be less than the SCAQMD thresholds. As shown in Table AQ-4, the Proposed Project
would result in lower emissions in the six criteria pollutants in comparison to the approved SWIP Buildout
of the Project site. Thus, impacts related to exposing sensitive receptors to substantial criteria pollutants
would be less than significant, and no new impacts would occur.
Table AQ-3: Project Localized Construction Emissions (lbs/day)
Source NOx CO PM10 PM2.5
On-Site Project
Emissions
33.7 24.7 9.8 5.5
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 37 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Localized
Significance
Threshold
325.0 3,600.0 55.0 15.0
Exceeds Threshold? No No No No
Source: Air Quality, Health Risk, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Report (Appendix B).
Table AQ-4: Maximum Localized Operational Project Emissions
Source NOx CO PM10 PM2.5
On-Site Project
Emissions
<1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
Approved SWIP
Buildout
4.9 11.1 2.7 <1.0
Localized
Significance
Threshold
325.0 3,600.0 13.0 4.0
Exceeds Threshold? No No No No
Source: Air Quality, Health Risk, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Report (Appendix B), CalEEMod Summary Sheets for SWIP
Buildout (Appendix C)
.
Operational-Related Diesel Particulate Matter
CARB identified diesel particulate matter (DPM) as a toxic air contaminant (TAC) in 1998. Mobile sources
(including trucks, buses, automobiles, trains, ships, and farm equipment) are by far the largest source of
diesel emissions. The exhaust from diesel engines includes hundreds of different gaseous and particulate
components, many of which are toxic. Diesel exhaust is composed of two phases, either gas or particulate
– both contribute to the risk. The gas phase is composed of many of the urban TACs, such as acetaldehyde,
acrolein, benzene, 1,3‐butadiene, formaldehyde, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. The particulate
phase has many different types that can be classified by size or composition. The sizes of diesel
particulates of greatest health concern are fine and ultrafine particles. These particles may be composed
of elemental carbon with adsorbed compounds such as organics, sulfates, nitrates, metals, and other trace
elements. Diesel exhaust is emitted from a broad range of on‐ and off‐road diesel engines.
A health risk assessment (HRA) was conducted for the Proposed Project (Appendix B). The closest sensitive
receptors are the single-family residential uses located approximately 340 feet from the Proposed Project
site across Almond Avenue.
Construction: A construction HRA, which evaluates construction-period health risk to off-site receptors,
was performed for the Proposed Project. Table AQ-5 identifies the results of the analysis assuming the
use of Tier 2 construction equipment equipped with Level 3 diesel particulate filters or the equivalent at
the closest sensitive receptor. Table AQ-6 below identifies the results of the analysis with implementation
of the modified SWIP mitigation measure 4.2-1b. As required by modified mitigation measure 4.3-1b, the
Project contractor shall ensure all off-road diesel-powered construction equipment of 50 horsepower or
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 38 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
more used for Project construction meets, at minimum, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) Tier 2
emissions standards or the equivalent and is equipped with Level 3 diesel particulate filters.
Table AQ-5: Unmitigated Health Risks from Project Construction to Off-Site Receptors
Location
Carcinogenic
Inhalation Health Risk
in 1 Million
Chronic Inhalation
Hazard Index
Acute Inhalation
Hazard Index
Worker Receptor Risk 1.76 0.032 0.000
Sensitive Receptor Risk 11.53 0.004 0.000
SCAQMD Significance Threshold 10 in 1 million 1.0 1.0
Significant? Yes No No
Source: Air Quality, Health Risk, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Report (Appendix B).
Table AQ-6: Health Risks from Project Construction to Off-Site Receptors with Mitigation
Location
Carcinogenic
Inhalation Health Risk
in 1 Million
Chronic Inhalation
Hazard Index
Acute Inhalation
Hazard Index
Worker Receptor Risk 0.29 0.005 0.000
Sensitive Receptor Risk 1.89 0.001 0.000
SCAQMD Significance Threshold 10 in 1 million 1.0 1.0
Significant? No No No
Source: Air Quality, Health Risk, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Report (Appendix B).
As shown in Table AQ-6, the maximum cancer risk for the sensitive receptor maximally exposed individual
(MEI) would be 1.89 in 1 million, which would not exceed the SCAQMD cancer risk threshold of 10 in 1
million. The worker receptor risk would be lower at 0.29 in 1 million and would also not exceed the
threshold. The total chronic hazard index would be 0.005 for the worker receptor MEI and 0.001 for the
sensitive receptor MEI, which is below the threshold of 1.0. In addition, the total acute hazard index would
be nominal (0.000), which would also not exceed the threshold of 1.0. Therefore, construction of the
Proposed Project would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds and would not expose nearby sensitive receptors
to substantial pollutant concentrations. No new impact would occur.
Operation: To determine the potential health risk to people living and working near the Proposed Project
associated with the exhaust of diesel-powered trucks and equipment, an operational HRA was conducted.
The residential risk incorporates both the risk for a child living in a nearby residence for 9 years (the
standard period of time for child risk) and an adult living in a nearby residence for 30 years (considered a
conservative period of time for an individual to live in any one residence).
Table AQ-7 Health Risks from Project Operation to Off-Site Receptors
Location
Carcinogenic
Inhalation Health Risk
in 1 Million
Chronic Inhalation
Hazard Index
Acute Inhalation
Hazard Index
Worker Receptor Risk 0.07 <0.001 <0.001
Sensitive Receptor Risk 0.05 <0.001 <0.001
SCAQMD Significance Threshold 10.0 in 1 million 1.0 1.0
Significant? No No No
Source: Air Quality, Health Risk, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Report (Appendix B).
As shown in Table AQ-7, the maximum cancer risk for the sensitive receptor MEI would be 0.07 in 1 million,
which would not exceed the SCAQMD cancer risk threshold of 10 in 1 million. The worker receptor risk
would be lower at 0.05 in 1 million, which would also not exceed the threshold. The total chronic hazard
index would be less than 0.001 for the worker receptor MEI and for the sensitive receptor MEI, which is
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 39 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
below the threshold of 1.0. In addition, the total acute hazard index would be less than 0.001, which would
also not exceed the threshold of 1.0. As these results show, all health risk levels to nearby residents from
operation- related emissions of TACs would be well below the SCAQMD’s HRA thresholds. Therefore, no
new impacts would occur from operation of the Proposed Project.
Mitigation Program
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
Mitigation Measures 4.2-1b, 4.2-2a through 4.2-2g and 4.4-2j and 4.4-2k, discussed above, are applicable.
Mitigation Measure 4.2-1b has been modified below to reflect the use of Tier 2 emission standards.
Underlined text reflects language that has been added to the mitigation measure and strikethrough
represents language that has been deleted from the mitigation measure.
4.2-1b Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, all applicants shall submit construction plans
to the City of Fontana denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use.
Construction contractors shall ensure all off-road diesel-powered construction
equipment of 50 horsepower or more used for the project construction at minimum
meets the California Air Resources Board Tier 2 emissions standards equipped with Level
3 diesel particulate filters or the Equivalent. provide evidence that low emission mobile
construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to
be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures
imposed by the SCAQMD as well as City Planning Staff.
Conclusion
Air quality impacts related to the Proposed Project are within the limit of impacts identified in the
Approved Project FEIR, as supplemented by additional technical analysis. No new or more severe impacts
relative to air quality from previously identified significant impacts evaluated in the Approved Project FEIR
would occur. Additionally, no new information of substantial importance that was not known and could
not have been known at the time the Approved Project FEIR was certified is available that would alter the
Approved Project FEIR’s significance finding.
Threshold (d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors adversely affecting a
substantial number of people)?
No New or More Severe Impact: The SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook identifies certain land uses as
sources of odors. These land uses include the following: agriculture, wastewater treatment plant, food
processing plants, chemical plants, composting, refineries, landfills, diaries, and fiberglass molding. The
Proposed Project is a warehouse facility and does not propose to include any odor-inducing uses on the
Project site. As the Proposed Project would not be a source of objectionable odors; no impact would occur.
Mitigation Program
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 40 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
None identified in the Approved Project FEIR.
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impact from odors. There are no new
potentially significant impacts associated with the Proposed Project; therefore, no new and/or
considerably different mitigation measures are required for issues related to air quality.
Overall Air Quality Impact Conclusion
With regard to CEQA Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), the changes proposed by the
Proposed Project would not result in any new or more severe impacts with respect to air quality.
Therefore, preparation of an SEIR analysis is not warranted.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 41 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
4.4 Biological Resources
4.4.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The Approved Project FEIR concluded that future development occurring within the SWIP Specific Plan
Update area would not adversely affect, either directly or through habitat modification, any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species, any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community upon the implementation of the following mitigation measures: 4.3-1a through 4.3-1h.
Similarly, the Approved Project FEIR determined that future development would not affect any wetlands
and drainages with implementation of mitigation measure 4.3-3a, or habitat conservation plans upon the
implementation of the following mitigation measures: 4.3-1a through 4.3-1f.
4.4.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on
any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and
Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
No New or More Severe Impact: The Project site is developed, completely disturbed, and located within
an urban area that does not contain any native flora or fauna habitats. Due to the disturbed status of the
site, it does not provide habitat that could be utilized by species listed or candidates for listing by the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), or California Native
Plant Society (CNPS). Therefore, no new impacts relative to a substantial adverse effect to candidate,
sensitive, or special-status species would occur due to implementation of the Proposed Project.
Mitigation Program
There are no new or more severe significant impacts associated with the Proposed Project; therefore, no new
mitigation measures are required for issues related to biological resources. The FEIR includes measures to
reduce potential impacts associated the implementation of the Approved Project.
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
The following mitigation measures from the Approved Project FEIR were intended to protect biological
resources within the SWIP Specific Plan Update area. The mitigation measures shown below do not apply
to the Proposed Project because the Proposed Project site does not contain any special status species or
habitat that could support such species, trees that could support nesting birds, jurisdictional waters, or
wildlife corridors.
4.3-1a The City of Fontana Planning Division shall require that all future project applicants
prepare a Biological Assessment prior to the issuance of grading permits. The Biological
Assessment shall include a vegetation map of the proposed project area, analysis of the
impacts associated with plant and animal species and habitats, and conduct habitat
evaluations for burrowing owl, Delhi Sands flower-loving fly, San Diego pocket mouse,
western mastiff bat, western yellow bat, and San Diego desert woodrat. If any of these
species are determined to be present, then coordination with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 42 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Service and/or California Department of Fish and Game shall be conducted to determine
what, if any, permits or clearances are required prior to development.
4.3-1b Any future land disturbance for site-specific developments within the Project site shall be
conducted outside of the State-identified bird nesting season (February 15 through
September 1). If construction during the nesting season must occur, the site shall be
evaluated by a City-approved biologist prior to ground disturbance to determine if nesting
birds exist on site. If any nests are discovered, the biologist shall delineate an appropriate
buffer zone around the nest, depending on the species and type of construction activity.
Only construction activities approved by the biologist shall take place within the buffer
zone until the nest is vacated.
4.3-1c: Prior to any ground disturbance, trees scheduled for removal shall be evaluated by a City-
approved biologist for roosting bats. If a roost is present the biologist will develop a plan
to minimize impacts to the bats to the greatest extent feasible.
4.3-1d The City shall encourage the preservation of natural habitat in conjunction with private
or public development projects.
4.3-1e Mitigation shall be provided for removal of any natural habitat, including restoration of
degraded habitat of the same type, creation of new or extension of existing habitat of the
same type, financial contribution to a habitat conservation fund administered by a
Federal, State, or local government agency, or by a non-profit agency conservancy.
4.3-1f Local CEQA procedures shall be applied to identify potential impacts to rare, threatened
and endangered species.
4.3-1g Evidence of satisfactory compliance shall be provided by Project Applicant with any
required State and/or Federal permits, prior to issuance of grading permits for individual
projects.
4.3-1h Any development that results in the potential take or substantial loss of occupied habitat
for any threatened or endangered species shall conduct formal consultation with the
appropriate regulatory agency, and shall implement required mitigation pursuant to
applicable protocols. Consultation shall be on a project-by-project basis and measures
shall be negotiated independently for each development project.
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe or more severe impact on a status or listed
species. Similar to the Approved Project FEIR findings, the Proposed Project is not anticipated to cause
any impacts to species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species by the CDFW or
USFWS. The Proposed Project would redevelop an existing developed area and previously disturbed land.
No new or more severe impacts from a previously identified significant and unavoidable impact evaluated
in the Approved FEIR would occur. Additionally, no new information of substantial importance that was
not known and could not have been known at the time the Approved Project FEIR was certified is available
that would impact the prior finding of significant and unavoidable impacts under this issue area.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 43 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Threshold (b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
No New or More Severe Impact: The Approved Project FEIR found that future development within the
SWIP Specific Plan Update area would not adversely affect any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community upon the implementation of recommended mitigation measures. The Project site is currently
utilized as a truck and trailer sales yard and does not contain jurisdictional waters, i.e., Waters of the U.S.
as regulated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control
Board (RWQCB), and/or streambed and associated riparian habitat as regulated by the CDFW. No CDFW
jurisdictional stream or associated riparian habitat occurs on the site, as the Project site has been fully
developed. In addition, no waters of the U.S. or wetlands occur on the Project site. Further, no vernal
pools are located on the site.
Consistent with the Approved Project FEIR findings, no drainages are located onsite, and no aspect of the
Proposed Project site presents evidence of jurisdictional waters. Therefore, no new impacts relative to
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community would be caused due to the Proposed Project
implementation and no mitigation is required.
Mitigation Program
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
Mitigation Measures 4.3-1a to 4.3-1h, discussed above, do not apply to the Project.
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impact on a riparian habitat or other sensitive
natural community. There are no new potentially significant impacts associated with the Proposed
Project. No riparian habitat exists on-site; therefore, no new and/or considerably different mitigation
measures are required. No new or more severe impact would occur from the Proposed Project
implementation.
Threshold (c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including,
but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or other means?
No New or More Severe Impact: The Approved Project FEIR found that the SWIP Specific Plan Update
area has the potential for streambeds, wetlands, and/or riparian areas to occur onsite, especially in
undeveloped or unpaved areas throughout the Specific Plan Update area. The Approved Project FEIR
suggested that as development proposals within the Specific Plan Update area are received, properties,
where a potential for wetlands and/or drainages exists, will require the preparation of a jurisdictional
delineation (Mitigation Measure 4.3-3a). The jurisdictional delineation would be utilized to determine the
acreage of impact, regulating agencies, jurisdictional limits, and mitigation requirements. Upon
implementation of the recommended mitigation measure, impacts related to wetlands and drainages
would be less than significant.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 44 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
As discussed in the previous response, no CDFW jurisdictional streams or riparian habitat occur on the
Proposed Project site. Thus, a jurisdictional delineation is not required for the Proposed Project. In
addition, no waters of the United States or wetlands occur on the site. Further, no vernal pools are located
on the site. Additionally, no new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not
have been known at the time the Approved Project FEIR was certified is available that would change the
finding of less than significant impact under this threshold.
Mitigation Program
Mitigation Measures from the FEIR
4.3-3a For future development proposals that could potentially affect jurisdictional drainages or
wetlands (to be determined by the City of Fontana Planning Division), the project
applicant shall prepare a jurisdictional delineation to determine the extent of
jurisdictional area, if any, as part of the regulatory permitting process.
[This mitigation measure does not apply to the Proposed Project because no jurisdictional
wetlands or drainages exist on site.]
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impact on wetlands. The Proposed Project
would be consistent with the Approved Project FEIR in that it would not result in a significant impact to
wetlands including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc. No jurisdictional drainages and/or
wetlands exist on site. No new or more severe impact would occur from the Proposed Project
implementation.
Threshold (d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or
wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
No New or More Severe Impact: Refer above to thresholds 4.4.2(a) and (b). The Approved Project FEIR
concluded that the SWIP Specific Plan Update area does not function as a wildlife movement corridor,
since the area is mostly developed, with most of the land converted to industrial, commercial, and
residential uses. It is noted that the Jurupa Mountains, located south of the SWIP Specific Plan Update
area, provide habitat for many species of plants and animals. However, the mountains function as an
ecological island and do not provide for significant movement to the urbanized north.
Consistent of the Approved Project FEIR findings, the Proposed Project site is surrounded by urban
development (paved roads and industrial development). Based on the Proposed Project site’s location,
and due to the urbanized nature of the area, no migratory corridors, migratory fish, or established native
resident species would be affected.
Additionally, there are no trees on the site. Therefore, the site does not have the potential to provide
habitat for nesting migratory birds. Therefore, there is no potential for the proposed Project to impact
nesting birds.
Mitigation Program
Mitigation Measure 4.3-1b, discussed above, does not apply to the Project.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 45 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impact on fish and wildlife and their habitat.
The Proposed Project would not conflict with the movement of wildlife habitat, including migratory birds.
Therefore, there are no new or more severe impacts from the Proposed Project associated with
interference of movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, or foraging/nesting
birds.
Threshold (e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances related to protecting biological resources,
such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance, and
Threshold (f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
No New or More Severe Impact: According to the Approved Project FEIR, the SWIP Specific Plan Update
developments would not conflict with an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan, or local
policies/ordinances upon implementation of recommended mitigation. Additionally, the Approved
Project FEIR concluded that development in the SWIP Specific Plan Update area could involve the removal
of heritage, significant, or specimen trees; the Approved Project FEIR concluded that for protection and
preservation of heritage trees, significant trees, and specimen trees on public and private property, the
Proposed Project should comply with Chapter 28 Article III of the Municipal Code, in particular, Code
Section 28-64, Permit Required for Removal of Heritage, Significant and Specimen Trees, which specifies
no person shall remove or cause the removal of any heritage, significant, or specimen tree unless a Tree
Removal Permit is first obtained. Impacts in this regard are considered less than significant following
compliance with the provisions of the Municipal Code.
Moreover, the Approved Project FEIR concluded that neither the City nor the County has adopted a
federal or state habitat conservation plan that provides any requirements or guidance for the SWIP
Specific Plan Update area. Buildout of the SWIP Specific Plan Update area would not conflict with an
adopted habitat conservation plan. Although a recovery plan was released in 1997 for Delhi sands flower-
loving fly (DSF) that includes the SWIP Specific Plan Update area, an assessment of the recovery of DSF in
2008 indicated that much of the Jurupa Recovery Unit may no longer provide conservation value for DSF.
However, implementation of Mitigation Measures 4.3-1a through 4.3-1f would provide the necessary
analysis to formally determine whether areas within the SWIP Specific Plan Update area provide viable
habitat for DSF. The Project site is fully developed with urban uses and would not require a biological
assessment. As such, impacts in this regard would be less than significant.
Similarly, the Proposed Project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources. Additionally, no new information of substantial importance that was not known and
could not have been known at the time the Approved Project FEIR was certified is available that would
change the finding of less than significant impact under this threshold.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 46 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Mitigation Program
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
Mitigation Measures 4.3-1b, 4.3-1d, and 4.3-1g, discussed above, do not apply to the Project.
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impact as it pertains to conflict with plans,
policies, and ordinances. There are no new potentially significant impacts associated with the Proposed
Project; therefore, no new and/or considerably different mitigation measures are required.
Overall Biological Resources Impacts Conclusion
With regard to CEQA Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), the changes proposed by the
Proposed Project would not result in any new impacts, or increase the severity of the previously identified
impacts, with respect to biological resources. Therefore, preparation of a SEIR is not warranted.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 47 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
4.5 Cultural Resources
4.5.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The Approved Project FEIR determined that although adverse impacts to historical and archaeological
resources within the SWIP Specific Plan Update area are not likely to occur, in order to mitigate any
potential unforeseeable impacts to a less than significant level, the following Mitigation Measures were
recommended: Mitigation Measures 4.4-1a, 4.4-1b, 4.4-2a through 4.4-2c, and 4.4-3a and 4.4-3b. In
addition, the Approved Project FEIR complied with Senate Bill 18 which involved consultation with a total
of eight tribes, from whom two responses were received (Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians and the
Morongo Band of Mission Indians).
4.5.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
According to the Approved Project FEIR, the Historical/Archaeological Records Search prepared for the
SWIP Specific Plan Update concluded that the likelihood of encountering potentially significant historic-
period resources within boundaries is low. Although a total of nine historic-period resources were
documented as part of the Historical/Archaeological Records Search, it was determined that all nine were
either unlikely to be impacted by the Approved Project or did not merit listing in the NRHP or CRHR. The
Approved Project FEIR determined that the SWIP Specific Plan Update area was highly disturbed due to
industrial, residential and agricultural land uses and that the site has had more than 19 previous cultural
resources studies that have taken place, resulting in the recording of 36 cultural resources within a one-
mile radius of the Approved Project site. As a result of these studies, no archaeological resources or Native
American sites were found within the boundaries. Thus, the Approved Project FEIR determined that the
likelihood of encountering potentially significant prehistoric archaeological remains within SWIP Specific
Plan Update area is low; however, the following Mitigation Measures were recommended: 4.4-1a, 4.4-1b,
4.4-2a, 4.4-2b, and 4.4-2c.
A Project site-specific Cultural Resources Assessment was prepared by Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
in June 2022 (see Appendix D) which is summarized below.
As part of the Cultural Resources Assessment, an archaeological records search was conducted at the
SCCIC. This included a review of all recorded historic and prehistoric cultural resources, as well as a review
of known cultural resources, and survey and excavation reports generated from projects completed within
a one-mile radius of the Proposed Project site. In addition, a review was conducted of the National
Register of Historic Places (NRHP), the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), and documents
and inventories from the California Office of Historic Preservation, including the lists of California
Historical Landmarks, California Points of Historical Interest, Listing of National Register Properties, and
the Inventory of Historic Structures.
The results of the SCCIC search revealed a total of 33 previously recorded cultural resources have been
identified within a one-mile radius of the Proposed Project site. One of the resources, the boundaries of
the historic Kaiser Steel complex, is mapped as overlapping the Project site. However, it appears this
boundary was loosely drawn and, although in proximity of the original location of the Kaiser Steel Mill,
the Project site does not appear to have ever contained any elements of the resource (BFSA 2022). As
such, none of the cultural resources identified were documented directly within the Proposed Project
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 48 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
area. In addition, the results of the records search indicate that 21 previous cultural resource studies have
been conducted within a one-mile radius of the site, none of which include any portions of the Project
area.
In addition to the record search, a pedestrian survey of the Project site was conducted by Brian F. Smith
and Associates, Inc on April 28, 2022, which revealed no evidence of cultural resources.
The results of the Cultural Resources Assessment are summarized herein and included as Appendix D to
this Addendum.
Threshold (a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant
Section 15064.5?
Threshold (b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5?
Significance Evaluations
No New or More Severe Impact:
The Project site is completely disturbed and is covered with gravel and a small concrete slab containing
the prefabricated office for the truck and trailer sales yard. The Cultural Resources Assessment did not
identify any evidence of cultural resources on the site (BFSA 2022). Due to the disturbed nature of the site
and the lack of evidence of previously identified historical resources, it is unlikely that implementation of
the Project would impact an unknown historical resource. Thus, no historic resources would be impacted
from implementation of the Proposed Project.
However, if previously undocumented cultural resources are identified during earthmoving activities, a
qualified archaeologist shall be contacted to assess the nature and significance of the find and divert
earthmoving activities, if necessary, in accordance with Mitigation Measures 4.4-1b, 4.4-2b, and 4.4-2c.
No new or more severe impact to historical or archaeological resources, relative to the impacts evaluated
in the Approved Project FEIR, would occur. In addition, the Proposed Project would be subject to the City’s
Cultural Resources standard conditions of approval. Furthermore, no new information of substantial
importance that was not known and could not have been known at the time the Approved Project FEIR
was certified is available that would impact the prior finding of less than significant impact with mitigation
under this threshold.
Mitigation Program
The FEIR includes measures to reduce potential impacts associated with the implementation of the
Approved Project. The following measures from the Approved Project FEIR are applicable to the Project:
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
Note that Mitigation Measure 4.4-1a from the Approved Project FEIR has already been satisfied with
regard to the Proposed Project, as the Project site has already been assessed for cultural resources and
none were found.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 49 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
4.4-1a A qualified archaeologist shall perform the following tasks, prior to construction activities
within project boundaries:
• Subsequent to a preliminary City review, if evidence suggests the potential for historic
resources, a field survey for historical resources within portions of the project site not
previously surveyed for cultural resources shall be conducted.
• Subsequent to a preliminary City review, if evidence suggests the potential for historic
resources, the San Bernardino County Archives shall be contacted for information on
historical property records.
• Subsequent to a preliminary City review, if evidence suggests the potential for sacred
land resources, the Native American Heritage Commission shall be contacted for
information regarding sacred lands.
• All historical resources within the project site, including archaeological and historic
resources older than 50 years, shall be inventoried using appropriate State record
forms and guidelines followed according to the California Office of Historic
Preservation’s handbook “Instructions for Recording Historical Resources.” The
archaeologist shall then submit two (2) copies of the completed forms to the San
Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for the assignment of
trinomials.
• The significance and integrity of all historical resources within the project site shall be
evaluated, using criteria established in the CEQA Guidelines for important
archaeological resources and/or 36 CFR 60.4 for eligibility for listing on the National
Register of Historic Places.
• Mitigation measures shall be proposed and conditions of approval (if a local
government action) recommended to eliminate adverse project effects on significant,
important, and unique historical resources, following appropriate CEQA and/or
National Historic Preservation Act’s Section 106 guidelines.
• A technical resources management report shall be prepared, documenting the
inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project site,
following guidelines for Archaeological Resource Management Reports prepared by
the California Office of Historic Preservation, Preservation Planning Bulletin 4(a),
December 1989. One copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, shall
be submitted to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for
permanent archiving.
[This mitigation measure has been accomplished through preparation of this
Addendum and related cultural studies.]
4.4-1b If any historical resources and/or human resources are encountered before or during
grading, the developer shall retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction
activities and to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study.
4.4-2a A qualified archaeologist shall perform the following tasks, prior to construction activities
within project boundaries:
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 50 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
• Subsequent to a preliminary City review, if evidence suggests the potential for
prehistoric resources, a field survey for prehistoric resources within portions of the
project site not previously surveyed for cultural resources shall be conducted.
• Subsequent to a preliminary City review, if evidence suggests the potential for sacred
land resources, the Native American Heritage Commission shall be contacted for
information regarding sacred lands.
• All prehistoric resources shall be inventoried using appropriate State record forms
and two (2) copies of the completed forms shall be submitted to the San Bernardino
County Archaeological Information Center.
• The significance and integrity of all prehistoric resources within the project site shall
be evaluated using criteria established in the CEQA Guidelines for important
archaeological resources.
• If human remains are encountered on the project site, the San Bernardino County
Coroner’s Office shall be contacted within 24 hours of the find, and all work shall be
halted until a clearance is given by that office and any other involved agencies.
• All resources and data collected within the project site shall be permanently curated
at an appropriate repository within the County.
4.4-2b If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the
developer shall retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities and to
take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of
the archaeologist, the City of Fontana shall:
• Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant
modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value.
• Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites
within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point.
• Pursue educating the public about the area’s archaeological heritage.
• Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval (if a local
government action) to eliminate adverse Project effects on significant, important, and
unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines.
• Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory,
evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the Project area. Submit one
copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County
Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving.
4.4-2c Where consistent with applicable local, State and federal law and deemed appropriate by
the City, future site-specific development projects shall consider the following requests
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 51 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
by the Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians, Morongo Band of Mission Indians and/or other
tribes as appropriate:
• In the event Native American cultural resources are discovered during construction
for future development, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find shall cease and
a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to
assess the find. Work on the overall Project may continue during this period;
• Initiate consultation between the appropriate Native American tribal entity (as
determined by a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards) and
the City/Project Applicant;
• Transfer cultural resources investigations to the appropriate Native American entity
(as determined by a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards)
as soon as possible;
• Utilize a Native American Monitor from the appropriate Native American entity (as
determined by a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards)
where deemed appropriate or required by the City, during initial ground-disturbing
activities, cultural resource surveys, and/or cultural resource excavations.
Standard Conditions of Approval
The Proposed Project would be subject to comply with the City’s Cultural and Tribal Standard Conditions
of Approval as listed below.
• Upon discovery of any tribal cultural or archaeological resources, cease construction activities in
the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All tribal cultural and
archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the
qualified archaeologist and tribal monitor/consultant. If the resources are Native American in
origin, interested Tribes (as a result of correspondence with area Tribes) shall coordinate with the
landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe will request
preservation in place or recovery for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of
the project while evaluation takes place.
• Preservation in place shall be the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not
feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavation to
remove the resource along the subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. All Tribal Cultural
Resources shall be returned to the Tribe. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native
American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in
the materials, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the
archaeological material, they shall be offered to the Tribe or a local school or historical society in
the area for educational purposes.
• Archaeological and Native American monitoring and excavation during construction projects shall
be consistent with current professional standards. All feasible care to avoid any unnecessary
disturbance, physical modification, or separation of human remains and associated funerary
objects shall be taken. Principal personnel shall meet the Secretary of the Interior standards for
archaeology and have a minimum of 10 years’ experience as a principal investigator working with
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 52 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Native American archaeological sites in southern California. The Qualified Archaeologists shall
ensure that all other personnel are appropriately trained and qualified.
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impacts on a historic or archaeological
resource. Similar to the Approved Project FEIR’s conclusion, implementation of the Proposed Project
would have a less than significant impact to historic and prehistoric archaeological resources. No new or
more severe impact from previously identified significant impacts evaluated in the Approved Project FEIR
would occur. Furthermore, no new information of substantial importance that was not known and could
not have been known at the time the Approved Project FEIR was certified is available that would impact
the prior finding of less than significant impact with mitigation under this threshold. The above-referenced
mitigation measures from the Approved Project FEIR are applicable.
Threshold (c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outsides of formal cemeteries?
No New or More Severe Impact: According to the Approved Project FEIR, the Proposed Project site is not
located within a known or suspected cemetery and there are no known human remains within the
Proposed Project site. No conditions exist that suggest human remains are likely to be found within the
boundaries of the Proposed Project site. Due to the level of past disturbance in the SWIP Specific Plan
Update area, it is not anticipated that human remains, including those interred outside of formal
cemeteries, would be encountered during earth removal or ground-disturbing activities.
The Proposed Project site-specific Cultural Resources Assessment (Appendix D) confirmed that the
Proposed Project site is not likely to contain human remains. However, consistent with the Approved
Project FEIR, if human remains are found, those remains would require proper treatment, in accordance
with applicable laws. California Health and Safety Code (HSC) Sections 7050.5-7055 describe the general
provisions for human remains. Specifically, HSC Section 7050.5 describes the requirements if any human
remains are accidentally discovered during excavation of a site. As required by State law, the requirements
and procedures set forth in Section 5097.98 of the PRC would be implemented, including notification of
the County Coroner, notification of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), and consultation
with the individual identified by the NAHC to be the “most likely descendant”.
If human remains are found during excavation, excavation must stop in the vicinity of the find and any
area that is reasonably suspected to overlay adjacent remains until the County Coroner has been called
out, and the remains have been investigated and appropriate recommendations have been made for the
treatment and disposition of the remains. Following compliance with State regulations, which detail the
appropriate actions necessary in the event human remains are encountered, impacts in this regard would
be less than significant.
Mitigation Program
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
None identified in the Approved Project FEIR.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 53 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impact pertaining to the disturbance of
human remains. The Proposed Project is consistent with the Approved Project FEIR. The Cultural
Resources Assessment did not find new potentially significant impacts associated with the Proposed
Project regarding historical, archaeological, or human remains; therefore, no new and/or considerably
different mitigation measures are required, but the Proposed Project must comply with the above
referenced applicable Approved Project FEIR mitigation measures.
Overall Cultural Resources Impacts Conclusion
With regard to CEQA Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), the changes proposed by the
Proposed Project would not result in any new or more severe impacts with respect to cultural resources.
Therefore, preparation of a SEIR is not warranted.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 54 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
4.6 Geology and Soils
4.6.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The Approved Project FEIR concluded that implementation of the SWIP Specific Plan Update would not
result in significant impacts relative to geology and soils, and no mitigation was identified as necessary to
reduce potential impacts. A Project site-specific geotechnical investigation was conducted by LGC
Geotechnical, Inc. on February 25, 2022 (Appendix E). Additionally, a Project site-specific Paleontological
Resources Assessment was conducted by Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. on June 2, 2022 (Appendix F).
4.6.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk loss,
injury, or death involving:
(i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-
Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area
or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of
Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.
(ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
(iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?
(iv) Landslides?
Faulting and Seismicity
No New or More Severe Impact: The Alquist-Priolo Zones Special Studies Act defines active faults as those
that have experienced surface displacement or movement during the last 11,000 years. According to the
General Plan EIR, although several earthquake faults exist within and in proximity to the City, none exist
beneath the SWIP Specific Plan Update area boundaries, including the Proposed Project site. The nearest
active regional fault traces are associated with the Sierra Madre Fault Zone approximately 6.7 miles north
of the Proposed Project site and the San Jacinto Fault Zone approximately 9 miles east of the Proposed
Project site. Consistent with the General Plan EIR, the Project-specific geotechnical study concluded that
the Proposed Project site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. No evidence of
faulting was identified during the geotechnical investigation.9
The intensity of ground shaking would depend upon the magnitude of the earthquake, distance to the
epicenter, and the geology of the area between the epicenter and the Proposed Project site. The Proposed
Project would be subject to adherence to standard engineering practices and design criteria relative to
seismic and geologic hazards, in accordance with the most recent California Building Code (CBC). The CBC
includes detailed design requirements related to structural design, soils and foundations, and grading to
ensure that public safety risks due to seismic shaking are minimized to levels below significant.
Liquefaction and Landslides
No New or More Severe Impact: The California Geological Survey (CGS) has not yet conducted detailed
seismic hazards mapping in the area of the Proposed Project site. The general liquefaction susceptibility
9 LGC Geotechnical, Inc. 2022. Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation, Proposed Industrial Development, 14387 Valley Boulevard, Fontana,
California. See Appendix D.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 55 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
of the site was determined by research of the San Bernardino County Official Land Use Plan, General Plan,
and Geologic Hazard Overlay. Map FH29C10 for the Fontana USGS quadrangle indicates that the Proposed
Project site is not located within an area of liquefaction susceptibility. Based on the mapping performed
by the County, and the subsurface conditions encountered at the boring locations, liquefaction is not
considered to be a design concern for the Proposed Project. Because the SWIP Specific Plan Update area
and surrounding area are characterized by relatively flat topography, there are no land features in the
vicinity capable of producing landslides. Therefore, the Project would result in less than significant impacts
related to landslides and no new impacts would result from the Proposed Project.
Mitigation Program
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
None identified in the Approved Project FEIR.
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe new impact on a geologic and soil resources.
The Proposed Project is consistent with the Approved Project FEIR. Proposed Project implementation
would not expose people or structures to abnormal seismic ground shaking, ground failure or liquefaction,
or landslides; therefore, no impact would occur from Proposed Project implementation.
Threshold (b) Result in substantial erosion or loss of topsoil?
No New or More Severe Impact: The Approved Project FEIR concluded that the construction associated
with future development in the SWIP Specific Plan Update area would produce loose soils, which would
be subject to erosion during on-site grading and excavation. Grading and trenching for construction may
expose soils to short-term wind and water erosion. The Proposed Project would be required to comply
with all requirements set forth in the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for
construction activities (e.g., implementation of Best Management Practices [BMPs] through preparation
of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan [SWPPP]), reducing potential impacts to less than significant
levels. Compliance with the NPDES is a condition of approval which would be verified through the building
plan check process.
Mitigation Program
None identified in the Approved Project FEIR.
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impacts as it pertains to erosion or loss of
topsoil. There are no new potentially significant impacts associated with the Proposed Project. In addition
to measures noted in the Approved Project FEIR and as required by standard City plan check processes,
the Project Applicant would comply with applicable recommendations as set forth in the Proposed Project
Geotechnical Investigation, contained in Appendix E to this Addendum. These measures will be reviewed
and checked as part of the City’s grading and building plan check process. A less than significant impact to
10 San Bernardino County Geologic Hazard Maps. Available at http://www.sbcounty.gov/Uploads/lus/GeoHazMaps/FH29C.pdf.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 56 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
erosion or loss of topsoil would occur with adherence to recommendations in the Project-specific
geotechnicalreport.
Threshold (c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as
a result of the Project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
No New or More Severe Impact: Refer to the threshold (a) (i-iv) discussion, above. Consistent with the
Approved Project FEIR findings, the Geotechnical Investigation concluded that the Proposed Project site
would not become unstable as a result of the Proposed Project, or potentially result in an on-site or off-
site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse. No mitigation measures were
recommended. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, and no new impacts would result from
the Proposed Project.
Mitigation Program
None identified in the Approved Project FEIR.
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impact on geologic and soil resources. There
are no new potentially significant impacts associated with the Proposed Project; therefore, no new
mitigation measures are required for issues related to on- or off-site landslides, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse.
Threshold (d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code,
creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property?
No New or More Severe Impact: The Approved Project FEIR concluded that impacts associated with
expansive soils were less than significant. Construction associated with development within the Specific
Plan Update area could produce finer-grained soils that are moderately to highly expansive which may be
present in the southern portions of the City. The Approved Project FEIR concluded that although the
potential for expansive soils exists, future developments in the SWIP Specific Plan Update area would be
subject to site-specific geotechnical investigations and would comply with the most recent (CBC)
standards to minimize any potential for hazards due to expansive soils.
Consistent with the Approved Project FEIR and the most recent CBC requirements, a Project site-specific
Geotechnical Investigation was prepared. The Geotechnical Investigation concluded that near-surface
soils in the Proposed Project site generally consist of medium dense to very dense sands and silty sands
and sands with varying amounts of gravel (Appendix E). These materials have been classified as very low
expansion potential. Therefore, no design considerations related to expansive soils are considered
warranted for this site. Consequently, impacts in this regard are considered less than significant.
Mitigation Program
None identified in the Approved Project FEIR.
Conclusion
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 57 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impact as it pertains to expansive soil. There
are no new potentially significant impacts associated with the Proposed Project; therefore, no new
mitigation measures are required for issues related to expansive soils.
Threshold (e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative
wastewater disposal systems where sewer are not available for the disposal of waste
water?
No New or More Severe Impact: Consistent with the SWIP Specific Plan Update, development within the
SWIP Specific Plan Update area would be served by sewer facilities. No septic tanks would be used as part
of the Proposed Project. As a result, no impacts associated with the use of septic tanks would occur as
part of the Proposed Project’s implementation.
Mitigation Program
None identified in the Approved Project FEIR.
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impact as it pertains to soils incapable of
adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. There are no
new potentially significant impacts associated with the Proposed Project regarding septic tanks or
wastewater disposal systems; therefore, no new and/or considerably different mitigation measures are
required.
Threshold (f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?
No New or More Severe Impact: The Approved Project FEIR concluded that future developments within
SWIP Specific Plan Update area boundaries would not directly or indirectly result in significant impacts on
a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature. However, Mitigation Measures 4.4-
3a and 4.4-3b were incorporated into the Approved Project FEIR and require an analysis of potential
impacts to paleontological resources on a site-specific basis.
Consistent with the Approved Project FEIR requirements, a Paleontological Assessment (Appendix F) was
conducted and included a locality records search, literature review, and a field pedestrian survey. No
significant paleontological resources were identified within one-mile of the Proposed Project site,
however; seven localities consisting of large and small Pleistocene-age mammals as well as terrestrial
snails and freshwater clams were recovered approximately one-and-a-half miles southwest of the
Proposed Project site. Additionally, a saber-tooth cat specimen was reportedly discovered approximately
two miles southwest of the Proposed Project site.
According to the Paleontological Assessment, the Project site is underlain with potentially fossiliferous
late Pleistocene alluvial fan deposits that likely underlie the Holocene young alluvial fan sediments. These
deposits are considered to have high paleontological sensitivity.11
11 Brian F. Smith and Associates Paleontological Assessment. See Appendix E.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 58 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Excavation activity associated with the development of the Proposed Project site would have the potential
to impact the paleontologically sensitive Pleistocene alluvial units. Thus, it is the recommendation of Brian
F. Smith and Associates that a Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Program (PRIMP) be put in
place to monitor, salvage, and curate any recovered fossils from the study area (Appendix F). The
recommendation of Brian F. Smith and Associates would be satisfied with adherence to Mitigations
Measures 4.4-3a and 4.4-3b.
Consistent with the paleontological report recommendations, the Approved Project FEIR Mitigation
Measures 4.4-3a and 4.4-3b are applicable. With implementation of the mitigation measures, a less than
significant impacts on paleontological resources would occur.
Mitigation Program
The Approved Project FEIR includes measures to reduce potential impacts associated the implementation
of the Approved Project. The following measures from the FEIR are applicable to the Proposed Project:
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
4.4-3a: A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a pre-construction field survey of any Project site
within the Specific Plan Update area that is underlain by older alluvium. The
paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that provides specific recommendations
regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be
appropriate.
4.4-3b Should mitigation monitoring be recommended for a specific project within the Project
site (Specific Plan Update), the Mitigation Program shall include, but not be limited to,
the following measures:
• Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of
fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of
earth-disturbing activities.
• Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, earth-disturbing
activities shall be diverted elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If
construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor shall immediately
divert construction and notify the monitor of the find.
• All recovered fossils shall be prepared, identified, and curated for documentation in
the summary report and transferred to an appropriate depository (i.e., San
Bernardino County Museum).
• A summary report shall be submitted to City of Fontana. Collected specimens shall be
transferred with copy of report to San Bernardino County Museum.
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impact to paleontological resources. There
are no new potentially significant impacts associated with the Proposed Project; therefore, no new
mitigation measures required for issues related to expansive soils. However, the Approved Project FEIR
Mitigation Measures 4.4-3a and 4.4-3b are applicable.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 59 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Overall Geology and Soils Impacts Conclusion
With regard to CEQA Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), the changes proposed by the
Proposed Project would not result in any new or more severe impacts from the previously identified
impacts with respect to geology and soils. Therefore, preparation of a SEIR is not warranted.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 60 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
4.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Climate Change)
4.7.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The Approved Project FEIR concluded that implementation of the SWIP Specific Plan would result in less
than significant impacts with mitigation relative to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, but significant and
unavoidable impacts from cumulative GHG emissions. This analysis evaluates construction and
operational impacts associated with the Proposed Project relative to thresholds provided in the Approved
Project FEIR, as well as the updated Environmental Checklist Form.
4.7.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
This analysis evaluates construction and operational impacts associated with the Proposed Project relative
to thresholds provided in the Approved Project FEIR, as well as the updated Environmental Checklist Form.
Refer to Appendix C.
Background
Global climate change refers to changes in average climatic conditions on Earth as a whole, including
temperature, wind patterns and precipitation. Global temperatures are moderated by naturally occurring
atmospheric gases, including water vapor, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O),
as well as hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). These GHGs
allow solar radiation (sunlight) into the Earth’s atmosphere but prevent radiative heat from escaping, thus
warming the Earth’s atmosphere. GHGs are emitted by both natural processes and human activities.
Concentrations of GHG have increased in the atmosphere since the industrial revolution. Human activities
that generate GHG emissions include combustion of fossil fuels (CO2 and N2O); natural gas generated from
landfills, fermentation of manure and cattle farming (CH4); and industrial processes such as nylon and
nitric acid production (N2O).
GHGs have varying global warming potential (GWP). The GWP is the potential of a gas or aerosol to trap
heat in the atmosphere; it is the “cumulative radiative forcing effect of a gas over a specified time horizon
resulting from the emission of a unit mass of gas relative to a reference gas.” The reference gas for GWP
is CO2; therefore, CO2 has a GWP factor of 1. The other main GHGs that have been attributed to human
activity include CH4, which has a GWP factor of 28, and N2O, which has a GWP factor of 265. When
accounting for GHGs, all types of GHG emissions are expressed in terms of CO2 equivalents (CO2e) and are
typically quantified in metric tons (MT) or million metric tons (MMT).
Assembly Bill (AB) 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, established a State goal of
reducing GHG emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020, which would require a reduction of
approximately 173 MMT net CO2e below “business as usual” emission levels. Senate Bill (SB) 97, a
companion bill, directed the California Natural Resources Agency (Resources Agency) to certify and adopt
guidelines for the mitigation of GHGs or the effects of GHG emissions. SB 97 was the State Legislature’s
directive to the Resources Agency to specifically establish that GHG emissions and their impacts are
appropriate subjects for CEQA analysis. Executive Order (EO) S-3-05 was enacted in June 2005 and calls
for an 80 percent reduction below 1990 levels by 2050. SB 32 was signed into law in 2016 and establishes
an interim GHG emission reduction goal for the State to reduce GHG emissions to 40 percent below 1990
levels by the year 2030.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 61 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Threshold (a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a
significant impact on the environment?
No New or More Severe Impact: The Approved Project FEIR concluded that, due to uncertainties in
implementation of Federal, State and local programs to reduce GHGs and the reliance of the SWIP Specific
Plan on these programs to reduce GHG emissions, impacts to greenhouse gas emissions would be
significant and unavoidable.
During demolition and construction, temporary sources of GHG emissions include construction
equipment and workers’ commutes to and from the site. The combustion of fossil-based fuels creates
GHGs such as CO2, CH4, and N2O. Furthermore, CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment.
Exhaust emissions from on-site construction activities would vary daily as construction activity levels
change. Construction related GHG emissions estimated to be generated by the Proposed Project were
calculated using CalEEMod (Appendix B). It is estimated that the Project would generate approximately
420.0 MTCO2e during construction of the Project. When annualized over the 30-year life of the Project,
annual emissions would be 14.0 MTCO2e.
Long-term (operational) GHG emissions are typically generated from mobile sources (e.g., vehicle trips),
area sources (e.g., maintenance activities and landscaping), indirect emissions from sources associated
with energy consumption, waste sources (land filling and waste disposal), and water sources (water supply
and conveyance, treatment, and distribution). Following guidance from the SCAQMD, GHG emissions
were estimated for the operational year of 2024 using CalEEMod. Table GHG-1 shows the calculated GHG
emissions for the proposed Project.
Table GHG-1: Project Operational GHG Emissions
Emissions
Source
Operational Emissions
CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Percentage of
Total
Operational
Emissions
Area Sources <0.1 <0.1 0.0 <0.1 <0.1
Energy Sources 50.8 <0.1 <0.1 51.1 9.0
Mobile Sources 379.2 <0.1 <0.1 391.0 68.5
Waste Sources 18.3 1.1 0.0 45.4 8.0
Water Sources 59.6 0.7 <0.1 83.0 14.5
Total Project Operational Emissions 570.6 100
Amortized Construction Emissions 14.0 -
Total Annual Emissions 584.6 -
Previously Approved SWIP Buildout 968.5
Net Difference (Project – SWIP Buildout) (-383.9)
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 62 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Threshold 3,000 -
Exceed? No -
Source: Air Quality, Health Risk, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Imapct Report (Appendix B), CalEEMod Summary Sheets for
SWIP Buildout (Appendix C)
Although the Approved Project utilizes the 10,000 MTCO2e per year as the GHG threshold for warehouse
projects, the 3,000 MTCO2e per year threshold is based on a 90% emission “capture” rate methodology.
Prior to its use by the SCAQMD, the 90% emissions capture approach was one of the options suggested
by the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) in their CEQA & Climate Change white
paper (2008). The SCAQMD set their significance threshold to 3,000 MTCO2e/yr to define small projects
that are considered less than significant and do not need to provide further analysis. In addition, the City
has adopted the San Bernardino County’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Plan Update in 2021 and
Development Review Process (DRP) in 2016. The DRP procedures need to be followed to evaluate GHG
impacts and determine significance for CEQA purposes. If the GHG emissions from the project are less
than 3,000 MT CO2e per year and the project would apply GHG performance standards and State
requirements, project‐level and cumulative GHG emissions would be less than significant. Thus, the City
utilizes 3,000 MTCO2e per year as the GHG threshold for warehouse projects. Table GHG-1 shows that
the annual GHG emissions would be 584.6 MTCO2e per year, which also represents a net decrease from
the approved SWIP land use and is below the 3,000 MTCO2e per year screening threshold. Construction
and operation emissions would therefore have a less than cumulatively contribution to global climate
change impacts. In addition, the Proposed Project would be required to implement SWIP EIR Mitigation
Measure 4.2-5a, which would further reduce operational GHG emissions. Therefore, the Proposed Project
would result in a less than significant impact, and no new impacts would result from the Proposed Project.
Therefore, the Proposed Project would not lead to new or substantially more severe significant impacts
associated with operational GHG emissions.
Mitigation Program
According to the Approved Project FEIR, implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.2-5a would reduce
impacts to a less than significant impact.
4.2-5a Prior to the issuance of building permits, future development projects shall demonstrate the
incorporation of project design features that achieve a minimum of 28.5 percent reduction in
GHG emissions from business as usual conditions. Future project shall include:
Energy Efficiency
• Design buildings to be energy efficient and exceed Title 24 requirements by at least 5
percent.
• Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. Site and design building to take
advantage of daylight.
• Use trees, landscaping and sun screens on west and south exterior building walls to
reduce energy use.
• Install light colored “cool” roofs and cool pavements.
• Provide information on energy management services for large energy users.
• Install energy efficient heating and cooling systems, appliances and equipment, and
control systems (e.g., minimum of Energy Star rated equipment).
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 63 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
• Implement design features to increase the efficiency of the building envelope (i.e., the
barrier between conditioned and unconditioned spaces).
• Install light emitting diodes (LEDs) for traffic, street, and other outdoor lighting.
• Limit the hours of operation of outdoor lighting.
Renewable Energy
• Install solar panels on carports and over parking areas. Ensure buildings are designed to
have “solar ready” roofs.
• Use combined heat and power in appropriate applications.
Water Conservation and Efficiency
• Create water-efficient landscapes with a preference for a xeriscape landscape palette.
• Install water-efficient irrigation systems and devices, such as soil moisture-based
irrigation controls.
• Design buildings to be water efficient. Install water-efficient fixtures and appliances (e.g.,
EPA WaterSense labeled products).
• Restrict watering methods (e.g., prohibit systems that apply water to non-vegetated
surfaces) and control runoff.
• Restrict the use of water for cleaning outdoor surfaces and vehicles.
• Implement low-impact development practices that maintain the existing hydrologic
character of the site to manage storm water and protect the environment. (Retaining
storm water runoff on-site can drastically reduce the need for energy-intensive imported
water at the site).
• Devise a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and
location. The strategy may include many of the specific items listed above, plus other
innovative measures that are appropriate to the specific project.
• Provide education about water conservation and available programs and incentives.
Solid Waste Measures
• Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste (including, but not limited to, soil,
vegetation, concrete, lumber, metal, and cardboard).
• Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste and adequate
recycling containers located in public areas.
• Provide education and publicity about reducing waste and available recycling services.
Transportation and Motor Vehicles
• Limit idling time for commercial vehicles, including delivery and construction vehicles.
• Promote ride sharing programs (e.g., by designating a certain percentage of parking
spaces for ride sharing vehicles, designating adequate passenger loading and unloading
and waiting areas for ride sharing vehicles, and providing a website or message board for
coordinating rides).
• Create local “light vehicle” networks, such as neighborhood electric vehicle (NEV)
systems.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 64 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
• Provide the necessary facilities and infrastructure to encourage the use of low or zero-
emission vehicles (e.g., electric vehicle charging facilities and conveniently located
alternative fueling stations).
• Promote “least polluting” ways to connect people and goods to their destinations.
• Incorporate bicycle lanes and routes into street systems, new subdivisions, and large
developments.
• Incorporate bicycle-friendly intersections into street design.
• For commercial projects, provide adequate bicycle parking near building entrances to
promote cyclist safety, security, and convenience. For large employers, provide facilities
that encourage bicycle commuting (e.g., locked bicycle storage or covered or indoor
bicycle parking).
• Create bicycle lanes and walking paths directed to the location of schools, parks and other
destination points.
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would comply with all applicable mitigation measures and would not result in new
impacts to greenhouse gas emissions. As shown in the table above, GHG emissions are less than the
emissions disclosed in the Approved Project FEIR. No new impact or increase in the severity of an
identified impact would therefore occur with implementation of the Proposed Project.
Threshold (b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of
reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
No New or More Severe Impact: The Proposed Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy
or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. As described in the
previous response, the Project would not exceed thresholds related to GHG emissions and would be below
the maximum square footage allowed by the SID in the SWIP. The Project would also be within the overall
industrial development intensity assumed for the SID the Approved Project FEIR. In addition, the Project
would comply with regulations imposed by the state and the SCAQMD that reduce GHG emissions, as
described below:
• Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 32) is applicable to the Project because many of the
GHG reduction measures outlined in AB 32 (e.g., low carbon fuel standard, advanced clean car
standards, and cap-and-trade) have been adopted over the last 5 years and implementation
activities are ongoing. The proposed building would not conflict with fuel and car standards or
cap-and-trade.
• Pavley Fuel Efficiency Standards (AB 1493) establishes fuel efficiency ratings for new (model year
2009-2016) passenger cars and light trucks. The Project would develop a new warehouse facility
that would not conflict with fuel efficiency standards for vehicles.
• Title 24 California Code of Regulations (Title 24) establishes energy efficiency requirements for
new construction that address the energy efficiency of new (and altered) buildings. The Project is
required to comply with Title 24, which would be verified by the City during the plan check and
permitting process.
• Title 17 California Code of Regulations (Low Carbon Fuel Standard [LCFS]) requires carbon content
of fuel sold in California to be 10 percent less by 2020. Because the LCFS applies to any
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 65 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
transportation fuel that is sold or supplied in California, all vehicle trips generated by the Project
would comply with LCFS.
• California Water Conservation in Landscaping Act of 2006 (AB 1881) provides requirements to
ensure water efficient landscapes in new development and reduced water waste in existing
landscapes. The Project is required to comply with AB 1881 landscaping requirements, which
would be verified by the City during the plan check and permitting process.
• Emissions from vehicles, which are a main source of operational GHG emissions, would be
reduced through implementation of federal and state fuel and air quality emissions requirements
that are implemented by CARB. In addition, as described in the previous response, the Project
would not result in an exceedance of an air quality standard.
Additionally, Mitigation Measure 4.2-5a above would be implemented and would reduce emissions of
GHGs generated by the Proposed Project. Thus, the Proposed Project would not result in any new impacts
related to an applicable plan adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. GHG emissions are less
than the emissions disclosed in the Approved Project FEIR. Therefore, no new impacts related to GHG
emissions would occur.
Mitigation Program
Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
As previously identified, Mitigation Measure 4.2-5a from the Approved Project FEIR are applicable to the
proposed Project.
Conclusion
There are no new potentially significant impacts associated with the Proposed Project; therefore, no new
and/or considerably different mitigation measures are required.
Overall Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Conclusion
With regard to CEQA Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), the changes proposed by the
Proposed Project would not result in any new impacts, or increase the severity of the previously identified
impacts, with respect to GHG. Therefore, preparation of a SEIR is not warranted.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 66 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
4.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
4.8.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The Approved Project FEIR concluded that implementation of the SWIP Specific Plan Update would not
result in significant impacts relative to hazards and hazardous materials with implementation of the below
referenced Mitigation Measures. Additionally, a Proposed Project site-specific Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment was by Hillman Consulting on March 23, 2022 (Appendix G).
Threshold (a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine
transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
No New or More Severe Impact: The proposed construction activities would involve the transport, use,
and disposal of hazardous materials such as paints, solvents, oils, grease, and caulking, which are typical
with construction sites, including the construction of warehouse facilities. In addition, hazardous materials
would be needed for fueling and servicing construction equipment on the site. These types of materials
are not acutely hazardous, and all storage, handling, use, and disposal of these materials are regulated by
federal and state requirements, which the Proposed Project construction activities are required to strictly
adhere to. These regulations include: the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act and Hazardous
Materials Transportation Act; Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations (CalOSHA); and the state Unified
Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials Management Regulatory Program. As a result, impacts related
to routine transport and use of hazardous materials during construction would be less than significant.
Proposed Project operations would not involve acutely hazardous materials. The routine transport, use,
or disposal of hazardous materials would be limited to materials and solvents used for maintenance and
operation of the facility, including the upkeeping of landscaping and cleaning products. The Proposed
Project would be required to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local regulations, as permitted
by the Hazardous Materials Division of the San Bernardino County Fire Department to ensure proper use,
storage, and disposal of any hazardous substances. Overall, operation of the Proposed Project would
result in a less than significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use,
or disposal of hazardous materials. No new impact or increase in the severity of an identified impact would
therefore occur with implementation of the Proposed Project.
Mitigation Program
The FEIR includes measures to reduce potential impacts associated the implementation of the Approved
Project. The following measures from the FEIR are applicable to the Proposed Project:
Mitigation from the Approved Project FEIR
Mitigation Measures 4.5-1b through 4.5-1d were included in the Approved Project FEIR to mitigate
impacts associated with hazards to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials.
4.5-1a The City shall require that new proposed facilities involved in the production, use, storage,
transport or disposal of hazardous materials be located a safe distance from land uses
that may be adversely impacted by such activities. Conversely, new sensitive facilities,
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 67 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
such as schools, child-care centers, and senior enters, shall not to be located near existing
sites that use, store, or generate hazardous materials.
[This mitigation measure has been accomplished through preparation of this Addendum
and Project design]
4.5-1b The City shall assure the continued response and capability of the San Bernardino County
Fire Department/Fontana Fire Protection District to handle hazardous materials incidents
in the City and along the sections of freeways that extend across the City.
4.5-1c The City shall require all businesses that handle hazardous materials above the reportable
quantity to submit an inventory of the hazardous materials that they manage to the San
Bernardino County Fire Department – Hazardous Materials Division in coordination with
the Fontana Fire Protection District.
4.5-1d The City shall identify roadways along which hazardous materials are routinely
transported. If essential facilities, such as schools, hospitals, childcare centers or other
facilities with special evacuation needs are located along these routes, identify
emergency response plans that these facilities can implement in the event of an
unauthorized release of hazardous materials in their area.
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impact(s) as it pertains to routine transport,
use, or disposal of hazardous materials. There are no new potentially significant impacts associated with
the Proposed Project; therefore, no new and/or considerably different mitigation measures are required.
Threshold (b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably
foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
No New or More Severe Impact: As described above, the risks related to upset or accident conditions
involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment would be adequately addressed
through compliance with existing federal, state, and local regulations. Development of the Proposed
Project would result in a warehouse use that would use and store common hazardous materials such as
oils, paints, solvents, and cleaning products. Also, building mechanical systems and grounds and landscape
maintenance could also use a variety of products formulated with hazardous materials, including fuels,
cleaners, lubricants, adhesives, sealers, and pesticides/herbicides.
The environmental and health effects of different chemicals are unique to each chemical and depend on
the extent to which an individual is exposed. The extent and exposure of individuals to hazardous
materials would be limited by the relatively small quantities of these materials that would be stored, used,
and handled. Additionally, any business or facility which uses, generates, processes, produces, packages,
treats, stores, emits, discharges, or disposes of hazardous material (or waste) would require a hazardous
materials handler permit from the Hazardous Materials Division of the San Bernardino County Fire
Department, as described previously.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 68 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Through existing City and County Health Hazardous Materials Division permitting and occupancy
procedures, hazardous materials would be used and stored in accordance with applicable regulations and
such uses would be required to comply with federal and state laws to reduce the potential consequences
of hazardous materials accidents. In addition, a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) is required to
be implemented for the Proposed Project (as further discussed in Section 4.9, Hydrology and Water
Quality). The BMPs that would be implemented as part of the WQMP would protect human health and
the environment should any accidental spills or releases of hazardous materials occur during operation of
the Proposed Project.
As a result, implementation of the Proposed Project would not result in a significant hazard to the public
or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release
of hazardous materials into the environment, and operational impacts would be less than significant.
The Approved Project FEIR recommended mitigation measures to address hazardous materials, when
developing portions of the Specific Plan Update area. The Proposed Project would adhere to Mitigation
Measures 4.5-2b through 4.5-2c to minimize hazardous materials impacts during construction.
In accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1b, and in case of accidental release of hazardous materials
into the environment, the City shall assure that the continued response and capability of the Fontana Fire
Protection District and San Bernardino County Fire Department handle all hazardous materials incidents
in the City and along I-10. Short-term and long-term construction activities within the SWIP Specific Plan
Update area will not create a significant hazard to the public or environment. No new impact or increase
in the severity of an identified impact would therefore occur with implementation of the Proposed
Project.
Mitigation Program
There are no new potentially significant impacts associated with the Proposed Project; therefore, no new
mitigation measures are required for issues related to hazardous materials.
Mitigation from the Approved Project FEIR
The Proposed Project will adhere to mitigation measures 4.5-1b through 4.5-1d, 4.5-2b, and 4.5-2c for
both short term and long-term accidental releases, according to the Approved Project FEIR. Additionally,
A Phase I Assessment was conducted by Stantec in compliance with Mitigation Measures 4.5-2(a) to (c).
4.5-2a A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment shall be prepared in accordance with American
Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standards and Standards and Practices for All
Appropriate Inquiries prior to issuance of a Grading Permit for future development within
the Project site. The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment shall investigate the potential
for site contamination, and will identify Specific Recognized Environmental Conditions
(i.e., asbestos-containing materials [ACMs], lead-based paints [LBPs], polychlorinated
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 69 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
biphenyls [PCBs], etc.) that may require remedial activities prior to land acquisition or
construction.
[This mitigation measure has been satisfied through preparation of this Addendum and
related hazardous materials studies.]
4.5-2b Prior to potential remedial excavation and grading activities within the site (if remediation
is required), impacted areas shall be cleared of all maintenance equipment and materials
(e.g., solvents, grease, waste oil), construction materials, miscellaneous stockpiled debris
(e.g., scrap metal, pallets, storage bins, construction parts), above-ground storage tanks,
surface trash, piping, excess vegetation and other deleterious materials. These materials
shall be removed off-site and properly disposed of at an approved disposal facility. Once
removed, a visual inspection of the areas beneath the removed materials shall be
performed. Any stained soils observed underneath the removed materials shall be
sampled. In the event concentrations of materials are detected above regulatory cleanup
levels during demolition or construction activities, the Project Applicant shall comply with
the following measures in accordance with Federal, State, and local requirements:
• Excavation and disposal at a permitted, off-site facility;
• On-site remediation, if necessary; or
• Other measures as deemed appropriate by the County.
4.5-2c Prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit, a Certified Environmental
Professional shall confirm the presence or absence of ACMs and LBPs prior to structural
demolition/renovation activities. Should ACMs or LBPs be present, demolition materials
containing ACMs and/or LBPs shall be removed and disposed of at an appropriate
permitted facility.
4.5-2d In the event any electrical transformers require relocation as a result of future
development associated with the project, the relocation shall be conducted under the
purview of the local electricity purveyor to identify property-handling procedures
regarding potential polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).
[This mitigation measure does not apply to the Proposed Project because relocation of
electric transformers would not be required.]
4.5-2e Due to the railroad alignment within project boundaries, any construction in which the
soil around the railroad is to be disturbed shall be conducted under the purview of the
Fontana Fire Protection District to identify proper handling procedures. Once the soil
around the railroad has been removed, a visual inspection of the areas beneath and
around the removed area shall be performed. Any stained soils observed underneath the
area shall be sampled. Results of the sampling (if necessary) shall indicate the level of
remediation efforts that may be required (if necessary).
[This mitigation measure does not apply to the Proposed Project because a railroad
alignment is not located on the site.]
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 70 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
4.5-2f Areas of exposed soils within Caltrans right-of-way that would be disturbed during
excavation/grading activities shall be sampled and tested for lead prior to ground
disturbance activities on a project-by-project basis, so that any special handling,
treatment, or disposal provisions associated with aerially deposited lead may be included
in construction documents (if aerially deposited lead is above regulatory criteria).
[This mitigation measure does not apply to the Proposed Project because Caltrans right-
of-way would not be disturbed as part of the Project.]
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impacts pertaining to upset and accident
conditions involving the release of hazardous materials. There are no new potentially significant impacts
associated with the Proposed Project. The Phase I Assessment concluded that there is no evidence of
recognized environmental conditions connected with the property (refer to Appendix G); therefore, no
new mitigation measures are required for issues related to hazardous materials.
Threshold (c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
No New or More Severe Impact. There are no schools located within one-quarter mile of the Proposed
Project site. The nearest schools are Live Oak Elementary School, located approximately 0.7-mile
northeast of the Project site, and Sequoia Middle School, located approximately 1.2 miles northeast of
the Project site. As discussed in responses (a) and (b), no significant impacts relating to the use of
hazardous materials or substances are anticipated. Accordingly, no new or more severe impact from a
previously identified significant impact evaluated in the Approved Project FEIR would occur. Additionally,
no new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known at the
time the Approved Project FEIR was certified is available that would change the impact finding.
Mitigation Program
There are no new potentially significant impacts associated with the Proposed Project; therefore, no new
mitigation measures are required for issues related to hazardous materials.
Mitigation from the Approved Project FEIR
Mitigation Measures 4.5-1b through 4.5-1d were included in the Approved Project FEIR to mitigate
impacts associated with hazardous emissions within one-quarter mile from a school. However, these
mitigation measures are not applicable to this impact, as the Proposed Project site is not located within
one-quarter mile of a school.
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impacts pertaining to emission or hazardous
materials release near a school. There are no new potentially significant impacts associated with the
Proposed Project; therefore, no new and/or considerably different mitigation measures are required.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 71 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Threshold (d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and as a result, would create a
significant hazard to the public or the environment?
No New or More Severe Impact: According to the Approved Project FEIR, there are various hazardous
material sites recorded within Federal, State, and local records databases. Potential hazards to
construction workers and the public may occur as a result of construction activities on existing sites that
could be contaminated. Future development of any of these documented hazardous materials sites would
require prior remediation and cleanup under the supervision of the Department of Toxic Substances
Control (DTSC) in order to meet Federal, State, and local standards. Since the Specific Plan Update does
not include any specific development projects, future development would be evaluated on a project-by-
project basis (e.g., through preparation of a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment to document the
presence and extent of hazardous materials contamination) to determine if such sites are listed on a
current regulatory hazardous materials site list. Mitigation Measures 4.5-2a to 4.5-2f would reduce
potential impacts in this regard to less than significant levels.
The Phase I Assessment conducted for the Project site included a review of federal, state, and local
regulatory databases to evaluate the Project site and known or suspected sites of environmental
contamination pursuant to ASTM Standard E 1527-13. As indicated in the Phase I Assessment, the Project
site is listed on the Facility Index System (FINDS), NPDES, California Integrated Water Quality System
(CIWQS), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act non generators (RCRA NonGen/NLR), Hazardous
Waste Tracking System (HWTS), and HAULERS databases. The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
concluded that none of the listings constituted a Recognized Environmental Concern (REC) in connection
with the Proposed Project site. No new impacts are anticipated as part of the Proposed Project and no
new mitigation measures are recommended. The Approved Project FEIR recommended measures are
applicable to the Proposed Project and would reduce impacts to less than significant levels.
Mitigation Program
Refer to Mitigation Measures 4.5-2a and 4.5-2f, discussed above
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impact as it pertains to hazardous materials
sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. There are no new potentially significant
impacts associated with the Proposed Project; therefore, no new and/or considerably different mitigation
measures are required.
Threshold (e) For a Project located within an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working the project area; and
No New or More Severe Impact: Ontario International Airport is located approximately three miles west
of the SWIP Specific Plan Update area. According to the City of Ontario General Plan (Ontario Plan) Figure
LU-6, Airport Environs, the southwestern portion of the SWIP Specific Plan Update area is located within
the “Airport Influence Area” of the Los Angeles/Ontario Airport. However, the SWIP Specific Plan Update
area is not located within a Runway Protection Zone, No Build Zone, or Approach Zone. Development
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 72 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
associated with the Approved Project FEIR would consist of industrial, commercial, and office
development and would not result in a safety hazard for people working or residing in the SWIP Specific
Plan Update area.
Ontario International Airport is located approximately 6 miles southwest of the Proposed Project site. The
Proposed Project site is not within the Ontario International Airport land use plan. Therefore, the Project
would not result in a safety hazard for people working on the site and impacts from the Project would be
less than significant.
Accordingly, no new or more severe impact from a previously identified significant impact evaluated in
the Approved Project FEIR would occur. Additionally, no new information of substantial importance that
was not known and could not have been known at the time the Approved Project FEIR was certified is
available that would change the impact finding.
Mitigation Program
Mitigation from the Approved Project FEIR
None identified in the Approved Project FEIR.
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new impact related to an airport land use plan or public airport
within. There are no new anticipated potentially significant impacts associated with the Proposed Project;
therefore, no new and/or considerably different mitigation measures are required.
Threshold (f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan?
No New or More Severe Impact: The City’s Emergency Operations Plan anticipates that all major streets
within the SWIP Specific Plan Update area would serve as evacuation routes. Construction activities
associated with the Proposed Project could temporarily impact street traffic adjacent to the Proposed
Project site during the construction phase due to roadway improvements and potential extension of
construction activities into the right-of-way. This could reduce the number of lanes or temporarily close
certain street segments. Any such impacts would be limited to the construction period and would affect
only adjacent streets or intersections. With implementation of the recommended mitigation measures
identified in the Approved Project FEIR, temporary street closures would not affect emergency access in
the vicinity of the Proposed Project site, and impacts would be less than significant in this regard. This
would be accomplished through compliance with Mitigation Measures 4.5-6a and 4.5-6b which include
preparation of an Emergency Evacuation Plan, including a Traffic Control Plan, and consultation with the
City Police Department to disclose temporary closures and alternative travel routes.
All future developments would be required to provide sufficient emergency access, as required by the
Municipal Code. Additionally, the City’s Emergency Operations Plan complies with and relies on the City’s
Hazardous Materials Response Plan. Project features to ensure sufficient emergency access include two
proposed 40-foot-wide driveways from Valley Boulevard and 30-foot wide drive aisles which would allow
for fire/emergency response vehicles to maneuver throughout the Proposed Project site.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 73 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
As such, future development within the Proposed Project boundaries would not interfere with an adopted
emergency response plan and/or the emergency evacuation plan and less than significant impacts would
occur. Accordingly, no new or more severe impact from a previously identified significant impact
evaluated in the Approved Project FEIR would occur. Additionally, no new information of substantial
importance that was not known and could not have been known at the time the Approved Project FEIR
was certified is available that would change the impact finding.
Mitigation Program
Mitigation from the Approved Project FEIR
4.5-6a Prior to the issuance of grading permits, future developers shall prepare a Traffic Control
Plan for implementation during the construction phase. The Plan may include the
following provisions, among others:
• At least one unobstructed lane shall be maintained in both directions on surrounding
roadways.
• At any time that only a single lane is available, the developer shall provide a
temporary traffic signal, signal carriers (i.e., flagpersons), or other appropriate traffic
controls to allow travel in both directions.
• If construction activities require the complete closure of a roadway segment, the
developer shall provide appropriate signage indicating detours/alternative routes.
4.5-6b Prior to construction, the City of Fontana Engineering Department shall consult with the
City of Fontana Police Department to disclose temporary closures and alternative travel
routes, in order to ensure adequate access for emergency vehicles when construction of
future projects would result in temporary lane or roadway closures.
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new impacts pertaining to an adopted emergency response plan
and/or emergency evacuation plan. There are no new potentially significant impacts associated with the
Proposed Project; therefore, no new and/or considerably different mitigation measures are required.
Threshold (g) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving
wildland fires?
The Proposed Project would not expose people or structures to a risk of loss, injury or death involving
wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are
intermixed with wildlands. The Proposed Project site is located within an urbanized area and is surrounded
by development on all sides. The Proposed Project site is not located within or adjacent to land designated
as a very high fire hazard severity zone.12 Impacts related to wildland fires would not be significant.
Accordingly, no new or more severe impact from a previously identified significant impact evaluated in
the Approved Project FEIR would occur. Additionally, no new information of substantial importance that
12 CAL FIRE Fire Hazard Severity Zone Maps (2022). Fire Hazard Severity Zone Viewer https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/ (accessed November 11,
2022).
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 74 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
was not known and could not have been known at the time the Approved Project FEIR was certified is
available that would change the impact finding.
Mitigation Program
Mitigation from the Approved Project FEIR
None identified in the Approved Project FEIR.
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new impact from wildland fires. There are no new anticipated
potentially significant impacts associated with the Proposed Project; therefore, no new and/or
considerably different mitigation measures are required.
Overall Hazards-Related Impacts Conclusion
With regard to CEQA Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), the changes proposed by the
Proposed Project would not result in any new or more severe impacts from the previously identified
impacts with respect to hazards and hazardous materials. Therefore, preparation of a SEIR is not
warranted.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 75 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
4.9 Hydrology and Water Quality
4.9.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The Approved Project FEIR concluded that implementation of the Specific Plan Update would not result
in significant impacts relative to hydrology and water quality, and no mitigation is necessary to reduce
potential impacts. A Preliminary Hydrology Report was prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates on
January 18, 2023 (Appendix M). Additionally, a Proposed Project-specific Preliminary Water Quality
Management Plan was prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. on May 10, 2022 (Appendix H).
4.9.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise
substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality?
Threshold (b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater
management of the basin?
No New or More Severe Impact: As stated in the Approved Project FEIR, development on the SWIP
Specific Plan Update area would be subject to NPDES requirements during both construction and
operations. The NPDES program would require that future development projects within the SWIP Specific
Plan Update area implement BMPs that adequately minimize potential off-site water quality impacts.
Construction-related BMPs would be identified based on site-specific conditions during preparation of a
SWPPP for each future development project. Long term operational BMPs would be identified through
issuance of an NPDES permit through the RWQCB and would include water quality features to ensure that
runoff is treated prior to discharge into the storm drain or regional conveyance facilities. Moreover, the
Approved Project FEIR concluded that because the majority of the SWIP Specific Plan Update area is
developed and urbanized, development of the area would not cause a significant increase in impervious
surfaces and therefore would not substantially impact groundwater supplies or interfere with
groundwater recharge. Additionally, the Approved Project FEIR identifies that the majority of the SWIP
Specific Plan Update area is developed and urbanized and implementation of the SWIP Specific Plan
Update would result in a less than significant impact on groundwater supplies. The FEIR found that the
Approved Project would not cause a significant increase in impervious surfaces and therefore would not
substantially impact groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge. No groundwater
extraction would occur as part of the Approved Project.
The Proposed Project site is located within the service area of the Fontana Water Company (FWC). The
use of groundwater for the Approved Project is discussed later in this Addendum under Section 4.17,
Utilities and Service Systems. As discussed in that section, there are sufficient water supplies (groundwater
is one of the sources) available to serve the Proposed Project. Additionally, the FEIR planned for the
Approved Project area (including the Proposed Project site) to be developed predominantly with industrial
uses. The Proposed Project would be a 96,002 SF warehouse which is not a water-intensive use, compared
to the 163,786 SF warehouse planned in the Approved Project FEIR. To further minimize any potential
groundwater depletion, the Proposed Project would include landscaped areas and an underground
infiltration system in the northern area of the Proposed Project site. Site runoff would be collected by
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 76 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
inlets in a drainage area that would drain into a subsurface infiltration system which would capture and
infiltrate the runoff. The FWC’s Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) also found that there would be
sufficient water supplies to meet demands, with approximately 50% of water supply provided by
groundwater in the FWC service area through the year 2045. See Table 4-4, Retail: Total Water Use and
Table 6-1, Historical and Projected Water Supplies in Normal Years, AFY of the FWC’s UWMP for detailed
information (https://www.fontanawater.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/FWC-2020-UWMP-June-
2021-Final.pdf). Per Table 6-1, the historical percentage of groundwater of the total water supply varied
between 52.8 percent and 93.5 percent, between 1995 and 2020. Projected percent groundwater of the
total supply is reduced and varies between 47.2 percent and 49.8 percent from 2025 to 2045.
The Proposed Project would consume water at a rate of approximately 1.6 acre-foot per year, based on
FWC water consumption rates (0.33 acre-foot, per acre, per year for industrial use13). The Proposed
Project would thus consume the same amount of water per year compared to the Approved Project. As
summarized in the Approved Project’s Water Supply Assessment (WSA), the water supplies (including
groundwater) available to the FWC will be sufficient to meet all present and future water supply
requirements in the FWC’s services area with the Approved Project for at least the next 20 years (City of
Fontana 2009). Therefore, the supply would meet the demand of the Proposed Project.
Based on the above discussion, the Approved Project FEIR finding of a less than significant impact, and
the type of development for this proposed Project (high-cube warehouse), it is anticipated that the
Proposed Project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or
otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality, nor would it substantially decrease
groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the Proposed
Project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basins. Lastly, the FWC is considering a
future groundwater recharge project, but its projected volume has not been quantified.14 The Proposed
Project would not interfere with future groundwater recharge efforts. No new impact or increase in the
severity of an identified impact would therefore occur with implementation of the Proposed Project.
Mitigation Program
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
None identified in the Approved Project FEIR.
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would not result in new or more severe impacts related to groundwater.
Additionally, no new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been
known at the time the Approved Project FEIR was certified is available that would change the impact
determination. Accordingly, the Proposed Project would not significantly impact local groundwater
recharge. Impacts would be less than significant.
13 Inland Empire Utilities Agency. 2016. 2015 Urban Water Management Plan. https://18x37n2ovtbb3434n48jhbs1-wpengine.netdna-
ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/FINAL-IEUA-WFA-2015-UWMP-2016-07-07.pdf (accessed June 18, 2022).
14 FWC. 2020. San Gabriel Valley Water Company Fontana Water Company Division 2020 Urban Water Management Plan.
https://www.fontanawater.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/FWC-2020-UWMP-June-2021-Final.pdf (accessed May 25, 2022).
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 77 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Threshold (c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through
the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious
surfaces, in a manner which would:
i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site;
No New or More Severe Impact: The Approved Project FEIR found erosion and siltation impacts to be less
than significant. The Proposed Project is located in an already urbanized area where drainage is directed
to a network of City and County-operated stormwater drainage facilities. Development of the site would
reduce the amount of impervious surfaces by 9%. The Proposed Project would provide approximately
10.8% of pervious landscaped areas and would also implement an underground infiltration basin designed
to collect and infiltrate post-development surface runoff in order to maintain existing water infiltration
rates (Appendix M). The Proposed Project would require placement of new drainage structures. This
would ensure that the drainage infrastructure is adequate to serve future development and minimize
impacts related to erosion or siltation. The Proposed Project site is currently fully developed and
development of the Proposed Project would include additional areas of pervious surfaces with the
addition of landscaping. In addition, as stated in the Approved Project FEIR, development on the SWIP
Specific Plan Update area would be subject to NPDES requirements during both construction and
operations. The NPDES program would require that future development projects within the SWIP Specific
Plan Update area implement BMPs that adequately minimize substantial erosion or siltation on or off-
site. In addition, the Proposed Project does not contain any water features including a stream or river;
therefore, substantial erosion and siltation on- or off-site would not occur. Impacts would be less than
significant in this regard.
ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which
would result in flooding on- or off-site;
No New or More Severe Impact: According to the Approved Project FEIR, the Proposed Project site is not
located within a FEMA designated 100-year floodplain, but in FEMA Zone X. Zone X are areas determined
to be outside the 0.2 percent annual chance floodplain. As stated previously, the Proposed Project would
reduce the amount of impervious surface by 9% as compared to the existing use. Additionally, the
Proposed Project would include approximately 10.8% of pervious landscaped areas and would introduce
a new drainage system (Appendix M). The Proposed Project would introduce landscaped pervious
surfaces as well as on-site inlets that would convey surface runoff to the onsite underground infiltration
basin. The underground infiltration system would be designed to accommodate a surface flow and catch
and absorb surface water. The basin would capture, and the infiltration system overflow would direct
flows off the site to the existing 10-foot storm drain easement and onto Almond Avenue. With
implementation of the Proposed Project and associated drainage improvement/features, on-site and off-
site flooding impacts would be reduced, resulting in a less than significant impact.
iii) create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing
or planned stormwater drainage systems or provided substantial additional
resources of polluted runoff; or
No New or More Severe Impact: Refer to Responses 4.9.2 (c)(i) and, (ii). Impacts would be less than
significant.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 78 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
iv) impede or redirect flood flows?
No New or More Severe Impact: As previously noted, the Proposed Project site is not located within a
FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not be constructed within
a 100-year floodplain and the Proposed Project would decrease impervious surfaces compared to existing
conditions. However, the Proposed Project includes landscaped pervious surfaces and on-site inlets that
would convey surface runoff to the onsite underground infiltration system and manage flood flows. See
Responses 4.9.2(c)(i) and (ii). Less than significant impact.
Mitigation Program
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
None identified in the Approved Project FEIR.
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impact from alteration of the existing
drainage pattern. Based on the Approved Project FEIR findings, the Proposed Project site is not located in
an area prone to the previously mentioned natural or manmade disasters. Thus, the Proposed Project
would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner
which would create the above-mentioned disasters. A less than significant impact is anticipated from the
Proposed Project implementation.
Threshold (d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project
inundation?
No New or More Severe Impact: The Approved Project FEIR determined that the SWIP Specific Plan
Update area is not located in the immediate vicinity of a body of water. In addition, the SWIP Specific Plan
Update area is generally void of land features capable of producing mudflow. Therefore, the Project would
not risk the release of pollutants in a flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zone and impacts would be less than
significant.
Mitigation Program
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
None identified in the Approved Project FEIR.
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impacts as it pertains to flood hazard,
tsunami, or seiche zones, or risk the release of pollutants due to Proposed Project site inundation. Based
on the Approved Project FEIR findings, the Proposed Project site is not located in an area prone to the
previously mentioned natural or manmade disasters. Thus, no pollutants would be released due to
inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow.
Threshold (e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable
groundwater management plan?
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 79 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
No New or More Severe Impact: The Proposed Project is underlain by the Upper Santa Ana Valley
Groundwater Basin – Chino Subbasin. The basin is not subject to a Sustainable Groundwater Management
Plan because it is adjudicated and exempted from the 2014 Sustainable Groundwater Management Act.
The City, and therefore Proposed Project site, are subject to the Santa Ana Watershed Authority’s
Integrated Regional Water Management Plan for the Santa Ana River Watershed called the One Water
One Watershed Plan (OWOW) Update 2018. The OWOW Plan describes how collaborative watershed
planning, water and land management, and project implementation supports improved sustainability,
resilience, and quality of life throughout the Santa Ana River Watershed through 2040.15 The Proposed
Project is also subject to the 2020 Urban Water Management Plan for the San Gabriel Valley Water
Company – Fontana Water Company Division, prepared in accordance with the Urban Water Management
Planning Act. The purpose of the UWMP is to provide a planning tool for FWC for developing and delivering
municipal water supplies to FWC’s water service area.
The Approved Project FEIR identified the FWC as the main water provider in the SWIP Specific Plan Update
area. As shown in Table 4.8-1, Fontana Water Company Historical Water Usage and Production (1988-
2008) of the Approved Project FEIR, the FWC’s historical production of water has met usage demands for
the SWIP Specific Plan Update area and surrounding service area. According to the FWC’s 2020 UWMP,
water supply met water demand for the FWC coverage area through 2020 and is forecasted to continue
to do so through 2045. See Table 4-3, Demands for Potable and Non-Potable Water-Projected and Table
6-1, Historical and Projected Water Supplies in Normal Years, AFY of the FWC’s UWMP for detailed
information (https://www.fontanawater.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/FWC-2020-UWMP-June-
2021-Final.pdf). Piping for the distribution of potable water is available within the local roadways
surrounding and within the Specific Plan Update area and is sufficient to meet current water supply needs.
In addition, the Proposed Project includes the replacement of some existing water lines and placement of
new water lines.
The Proposed Project will meet applicable local and regional water consumption and water quality goals
of the FWC, San Bernardino County Flood Control District, Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, and
the City.
Mitigation Program
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
None identified in the Approved Project FEIR.
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impacts pertaining to any conflicts with
water quality and groundwater plans. No new or more severe impact from a previously identified
significant impact evaluated in the Approved Project FEIR would occur. Although projections indicated in
the Approved Project FEIR that FWC would need to seek additional sources of water to serve its service
area, the Proposed Project would not conflict with any water quality control plan or sustainable
groundwater management plan and there are sufficient supplies according to the 2020 UWMP. The
Proposed Project site is proposing a similarly water-intensive use compared to the Approved Project.
15 Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority. 2018. One Water One Watershed Plan Update 2018. https://www.sawpa.org/wp-
content/uploads/2019/02/OWOW-Plan-Update-2018-1.pdf (accessed April 21, 2021).
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 80 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Additionally, an on-site water quality detention basin would help recharge groundwater in the basin. A
less than significant impact is anticipated.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 81 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
4.10 Land Use and Planning
4.10.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
According to the Approved Project FEIR, development within the SWIP Specific Plan Update area would
not divide an established community. The SWIP Specific Plan Update proposes to implement a range of
industrial, commercial, public, and residential uses, similar to what exists within the Specific Plan Update
boundaries today. The Approved Project FEIR concluded that implementation of the SWIP Specific Plan
Update would not result in significant impacts relative to land use and planning, and no mitigation is
necessary to reduce potential impacts.
4.10.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Physically divide an established community?
No New or More Severe Impact: The Proposed Project site consists of a completely disturbed gravel lot
with a small concrete slab and is utilized as a truck and trailer sales yard. The Project would develop the
site with a warehouse/light industrial building and associated infrastructure. No residential uses currently
occur on the site that would be impacted or divided by development of the Project. The Project site is
surrounded by commercial and industrial uses to the north, south, east, and west. The Project would be
compatible with the adjacent uses. Therefore, the Project would not divide or disrupt the physical
arrangement of the existing adjacent uses and would serve as an extension of the existing
commercial/industrial area. Furthermore, access to the site would be provided by driveways off an
existing roadway (Valley Boulevard). Thus, impacts related to physically dividing an established
community would not occur from the Project.
Consistent with the Approved Project FEIR, the Proposed Project would not divide an established
community. The Proposed Project will implement a warehouse facility that is similar and consistent with
surrounding uses. Existing development within the SWIP Specific Plan Update area is already divided by
the existing local roadway network, including I-10, and the Proposed Project is not anticipated to create
additional physical barriers between these uses. Therefore, there are no new or more severe impacts.
Mitigation Program
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
None identified in the Approved Project FEIR.
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impact as it pertains to physically dividing a
community. No new or more severe impact from a previously identified significant impact evaluated in
the Approved Project FEIR would occur. Additionally, no new information of substantial importance that
was not known and could not have been known at the time the Approved Project FEIR was certified is
available that would change the impact determination.
Threshold (b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan,
policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 82 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
No New or More Severe Impact: No potentially significant impacts related to land use and planning are
identified in the Approved Project FEIR. The Proposed Project is located within the boundaries of the SID.
The Proposed Project would not require an amendment to the SWIP Specific Plan Update, because the
SID is intended to provide opportunities for a mixture of uses, including service commercial,
entertainment, small businesses, research and development, restaurants, and hospitality uses. According
to the SWIP, light manufacturing and warehouse uses are permitted by right within the SID. The Project
would implement warehouse development consistent with the intended uses within the SID. As such, the
Proposed Project would be consistent with applicable land use plans, including the General Plan and SWIP.
The Proposed Project would not cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land
use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect.
Mitigation Program
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
None identified in the Approved Project FEIR.
Overall Land Use Impacts Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impact to as it pertains to conflict with land
use plans, policies, and regulations. The Proposed Project would be consistent with the SWIP Specific Plan
Update and General Plan, and the Proposed Project would not cause a significant environmental impact
due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect.
With regard to CEQA Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), the changes proposed by the
Proposed Project would not result in any new or more severe impacts from the previously identified
impacts, with respect to land use and planning. Therefore, preparation of a SEIR is not warranted.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 83 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
4.11 Mineral Resources
4.11.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The Approved Project FEIR concluded that according to the General Plan, it is not anticipated that the
SWIP Specific Plan Update area would contain deposits of precious gemstones, ores, or unique or rare
minerals, and development projects would not result in significant impacts relative to mineral resources.
Accordingly, no mitigation measures were required.
4.11.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to
the region and the residents of the state; and
Threshold (b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resources recovery site
delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan?
No New or More Severe Impact: Consistent with the Approved Project FEIR conclusions, the Proposed
Project site is not located in an area known to contain mineral resources that would be of value to the
region and the residents of the state.16 Additionally, implementation of the Proposed Project would not
result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resources recovery site delineated on the
general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan. No new or more severe impact relative to mineral
resources not already evaluated in the Approved Project FEIR would occur with implementation of the
Proposed Project. A less than significant impact would occur.
Mitigation Program
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
None identified in the Approved Project FEIR.
Overall Mineral Resources Impacts Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impact to mineral resources. Therefore, no
new and/or considerably different mitigation measures are required for issues related to mineral
resources. With regard to CEQA Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), the changes
proposed by the Project would not result in any new or more severe impacts from the previously identified
impacts, with respect to mineral resources. Therefore, preparation of a SEIR is not warranted.
16 California Department of Conservation. 2022. Mineral Land Classification.
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/informationwarehouse/index.html?map=mlc (accessed June 6, 2022).
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 84 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
4.12 Noise
4.12.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The Approved Project FEIR considered noise from construction activities as well as noise from operations,
including vehicle traffic and the exposure of employees to noise in the Approved Project area, as well as
potential exposure of nearby residents and other sensitive receptors to noise. With implementation of
mitigation measures, all noise impacts were determined to be less than significant with the exception of
long-term mobile noise and cumulative noise impacts, which would remain significant and unavoidable.
Additionally, a Project-specific Noise Assessment was prepared by LSA in November 2022 (Appendix I).
4.12.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Generation of noise levels in excess standards established in the local general plan or
noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
No New or More Severe Impact: Noise levels associated with the Proposed Project site would increase
over existing noise levels. This increase was identified in the Approved Project FEIR as a significant and
unavoidable impact associated with the SWIP Specific Plan Update. According to the Approved Project
FEIR, SWIP Specific Plan Update implementation may result in a long-term increase in ambient noise levels
associated with traffic noise and new stationary sources. However, impacts associated with
implementation of the Proposed Project would be consistent with the impacts disclosed in the Approved
Project FEIR. The Proposed Project would be required to implement the following mitigation measures
from the Approved Project FEIR, but the impact would remain significant and unavoidable.
Construction
Construction-related activities would temporarily increase ambient noise levels in the Proposed Project
vicinity. Construction-related noise levels at and near the Proposed Project site would fluctuate depending
on the level and type of construction activity on a given day. The analysis performed in the Approved
Project FEIR used conservative assumptions to calculate worst-case construction noise levels. Noise from
the Proposed Project construction activities could be audible at nearby residential uses. Construction
noise would be intermittent and last for several days or a few weeks. As discussed in the Approved Project
FEIR, short-term noise impacts associated with excavation, earthmoving, and construction activities would
be considered less than significant if: 1) construction activities are limited to daytime hours; 2)
construction equipment is equipped with noise control filters, as appropriate; and 3) construction activity
is monitored to ensure that noise reduction specifications and guidelines are met. Proposed Project
construction would be implemented in accordance with these conditions. Table NOI-1 shows the nearest
sensitive uses to the Project sire, their distance from the center of construction activities, and composite
noise levels expected during construction.
Table NOI-1: Potential Construction Noise Impacts at Nearest Receptors
Receptor (Location) Composite Noise Level (dBA Leq) at 50 feet1 Distance (feet)2 Composite Noise Level
(dBA Leq)
Industrial Uses (East) 88 300 72
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 85 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Industrial Uses (West) 365 70
Industrial Uses (North) 500 68
Residences (West) 550 67
1The composite construction noise level represents the site preparation and paving phases which are expected to result in the
greatest noise level as compared to other phases.
2The reference distance is associated with the average condition, identified by the distance from the center of construction
activities to surrounding uses.
Source: Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis (Appendix I)
As shown in Table NOI-1, it is expected that composite noise levels during construction at the nearest off-
site residential use to the west would approach 67 dBA Leq while construction noise levels at the nearest
off-site industrial uses to the east would approach 72 dBA Leq. Therefore, construction-related noise
generated by the Proposed Project would be less than the 80 dBA Leq and 90 dBA Leq construction noise
level criteria as established by the FTA for residential and industrial land uses, respectively. In addition,
the Proposed Project would comply with the construction hours specified in the City’s Noise Ordinance,
which states that the construction activities are allowed between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on
weekdays and between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays except in the case of urgent
necessity. Therefore, it is not anticipated that construction of the Proposed Project would result in new
short-term noise impacts or increase the severity of impacts previously analyzed in the Approved Project
FEIR. Additionally, the Proposed Project would be required to comply with Mitigation Measure 4.7-1a and
4.7-1b of the Approved Project FEIR. In addition, the Proposed Project would comply with the best
construction practices as stated below.
In addition to compliance with the City’s Municipal Code-allowed hours of construction of 7:00 a.m. to
6:00 p.m., on weekdays, and 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, the following best construction practices
would further minimize construction noise impacts:
• The Project construction contractor shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with
properly operating and maintained noise mufflers consistent with manufacturer’s standards.
• The Project construction contractor shall locate staging areas away from off-site sensitive uses
during the later phases of project development.
• The Project construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that
emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site whenever
feasible.
The Proposed Project would comply with the best construction practices, which would further minimize
the less than significant impacts related to construction noise. Therefore, no further environmental review
is required.
Operational
The closest sensitive receptor is a single-family residence located approximately 340 feet to the west of
the Proposed Project site. The Proposed Project would generate 12 fewer daily PCE trips during the AM
and PM peak hour than the Approved Project. Thus, as compared to the Approved Project, the Proposed
Project would not result in any increase in traffic noise. The primary noise producing operations associated
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 86 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
with the Proposed Project would occur from the truck operations and the rooftop mechanical ventilation
system (HVAC).
Truck Noise
Noise levels generated by delivery trucks would include arriving on site and maneuvering the trailers to
park within the loading docks. During this process, noise levels are associated with the truck engine, air
brakes, and back-up alarms while the truck is backing into the dock. These noise levels would occur for a
short period of time typically less than 5 minutes. A conservative analysis was used and assumed truck
arrivals and departure activities could occur twice in a given hour for a period of less than five minutes
each and unloading activities could occur at seven docks simultaneously for a period of more than 30
minutes in a given hour.
Air Conditioning Units
Rooftop mechanical ventilation units (HVAC) would be installed on the proposed buildings. A conservative
assumption of 6 rooftop HVAC units operating for 24 hours a day was utilized. The HVAC units would
generate up 63 dBA Leq at 5 feet. However, the mechanical ventilation system will cycle on and off
throughout the day.
Table NOI-2 and NOI-3 below shows the combined hourly noise levels generated by HVAC equipment and
truck delivery activities at the closest sensitive receptors during the daytime and nighttime.
Table NOI-2: Daytime Exterior Noise Level Impacts
Receptor Direction
Existing Quietist
Daytime Noise
Level (dBA Leq)
Project
Generated
Noise Levels
(dBA Leq)
Potential
Operational
Noise Impact?1
Residential (10146
Almond Ave) West 63.1 33.4 No
Residential (10201
Almond Ave) West 63.1 31.8 No
1 A potential operational noise impact would occur if (1) the quietest daytime ambient hour is less than 70 dBA Leq and
project noise impacts are greater than 70 dBA Leq, OR (2) the quietest daytime ambient hour is greater than 70 dBA Leq and
project noise impacts are 3 dBA greater than the quietest daytime ambient hour.
dBA = A-weighted decibels
Leq = equivalent noise level
Source: Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis (Appendix I)
Table NOI-3: Nighttime Exterior Noise Level Impacts
Receptor Direction
Existing Quietist
Daytime Noise
Level (dBA Leq)
Project
Generated
Noise Levels
(dBA Leq)
Potential
Operational
Noise Impact?1
Residential (10146
Almond Ave) West 56.8 33.4 No
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 87 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Residential (10201
Almond Ave) West 56.8 31.8 No
A potential operational noise impact would occur if (1) the quietest nighttime ambient hour is less than 65 dBA Leq and project
noise impacts are greater than 65 dBA Leq, OR (2) the quietest nighttime ambient hour is greater than 65 dBA Leq and project
noise impacts are 3 dBA greater than the quietest nighttime ambient hour.
Source: Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis (Appendix I)
As shown in Table NOI-2 Project-related noise level impacts would range from 31.8 dBA Leq to 33.4 dBA
Leq at the surrounding receptors. The Proposed Project does not exceed the 3 dBA greater than the
quietest daytime or nighttime ambient hour and the cumulative noise levels of the Proposed Project
would not exceed the 70 dBA Leq daytime or 65 dBA Leq nighttime noise standards established by the City.
Thus, impacts related to operational noise would be less than significant.
The Approved Project FEIR analyzed the noise impacts for the entire SWIP Specific Plan Update area, which
includes the Proposed Project. The noise analysis included in the Approved Project FEIR was based on the
regulatory requirements and noise generation factors resulting from the proposed land uses. The
Proposed Project includes uses which are consistent with development assumed in the Approved Project
FEIR and would not generate abnormal noise levels. Noise associated with the Proposed Project is
anticipated to primarily be from vehicle-related noise and HVAc. The amount of traffic associated with
the Proposed Project is less than what the amount of traffic that would occur with maximum development
of the site and is also less than the existing use. As such, the noise generated by the Proposed Project is
not anticipated to exceed thresholds or the noise levels identified in the Approved Project FEIR. Therefore,
the Proposed Project would not result in new noise-related stationary or vehicular impacts not considered
in the Approved Project FEIR. The Proposed Project would be required to comply with Mitigation Measure
4.7-1a and 4.7-1b, and 4.7-3b of the Approved Project FEIR.
Accordingly, no new or more severe noise impact would occur, relative to the Approved Project. Although
the Approved Project FEIR identified a significant and unavoidable impact, the Proposed Project would
have a less than significant impact after implementation of Mitigation Measures 4.7-1a and 4.7-1b, and
4.7-3b. The Proposed Project would be required to implement the following mitigation measures from
the Approved Project FEIR, but the impact from full buildout of the SWIP would remain significant and
unavoidable.
Mitigation Program
The Approved Project FEIR includes measures to reduce potential impacts associated the implementation
of the SWIP Specific Plan Update. The following measures from the Approved Project FEIR are applicable
to the Proposed Project:
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project Final EIR
4.7-1a The following measures shall be implemented when construction is to be conducted
within 500 feet of any sensitive structures or has the potential to disrupt classroom
activities or religious functions.
• The City shall restrict noise intensive construction activities to the days and hours
specified under Section 18-63 of the City of Fontana Municipal Code. These days and
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 88 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
hours shall also apply any servicing of equipment and to the delivery of materials to
or from the site.
• All construction equipment shall be equipped with mufflers and sound control
devices (e.g., intake silencers and noise shrouds) no less effective than those provided
on the original equipment and no equipment shall have an unmuffled exhaust.
• The City shall require that the contractor maintain and tune-up all construction
equipment to minimize noise emissions.
• Stationary equipment shall be placed so as to maintain the greatest possible distance
to the sensitive use structures.
• All equipment servicing shall be performed so as to maintain the greatest possible
distance to the sensitive use structures.
• If construction noise does prove to be detrimental to the learning environment, the
City shall allow for a temporary waiver thereby allowing construction on Weekends
and/or holidays in those areas where this construction is to be performed in excess
of 500 feet from any residential structures.
• The construction contractor shall provide an on-site name and telephone number of
a contact person. Construction hours, allowable workdays, and the phone number of
the job superintendent shall be clearly posted at all construction entrances to allow
for surrounding owners and residents to contact the job superintendent. If the City
or the job superintendent receives a complaint, the superintendent shall investigate,
take appropriate corrective action, and report the action taken to the reporting party.
In the event that construction noise is intrusive to an educational process, the
construction liaison will revise the construction schedule to preserve the learning
environment.
4.7-1b Should potential future development facilitated by the proposed project require off-site
import/export of fill material during construction, trucks shall utilize a route that is least
disruptive to sensitive receptors, preferably major roadways (Interstate 10, Interstate 15,
State Route 60, Sierra Avenue, Beech Avenue, Jurupa Avenue, and Slover Avenue).
Construction trucks should, to the extent practical, avoid the weekday and Saturday a.m.
and p.m. peak hours (7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.).
4.7-2a No new industrial facilities shall be constructed within 160 feet of any existing sensitive
land use property line without the preparation of a dedicated noise analysis. This analysis
shall document the nature of the industrial facility as well as “noise producing” operations
associated with that facility. Furthermore, the analysis shall document the placement of
any existing or proposed noise-sensitive land uses situated within the 160-foot distance.
The analysis shall determine the potential noise levels that could be received at these
sensitive land uses and specify very specific measures to be employed by the industrial
facility to ensure that these levels do not exceed those City noise requirements of 65 dBA
CNEL. Such measures could include, but are not limited to, the use of enclosures for noisy
pieces of equipment, the use of noise walls and/or berms for exterior equipment and/or
on-site truck operations, and/or restrictions on hours of operations. No development
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 89 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
permits or approval of land use applications shall be issued until the noted acoustic
analysis is received and approved by the City Staff.
[This Mitigation Measure does not apply to the Proposed Project as there are no sensitive
receptors within 160 feet of the Proposed Project site.]
4.7-3b Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a developer shall contract for a site-specific noise
study for the parcel. The noise study shall be performed by an acoustic consultant
experienced in such studies and the consultant’s qualifications and methodology to be
used in the study must be presented to City staff for consideration. The site-specific
acoustic study shall specifically identify potential noise impacts upon any proposed
sensitive uses (addressing General Plan buildout conditions), as well as potential project
impacts upon off-site sensitive uses due to construction, stationary and mobile noise
sources. Mitigation for mobile noise impacts, where identified as significant, shall
consider facility siting and truck routes such that project-related truck traffic utilizes
existing established truck routes. Mitigation shall be required if noise levels exceed 65
dBA, as identified in Section 30-182 of the City’s Municipal Code.
[MM 4.7-3b has been satisfied through the preparation of the Noise Impact Analysis
included as Appendix I.]
Conclusion
Mitigation Measures 4.7-1a to 4.7-1b would reduce construction and operational noise levels.
Additionally, no new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been
known at the time the Approved Project FEIR was certified is available that would change the significant
and unavoidable determination in the Approved Project FEIR. Mitigation Measure 4.7-3b has been
satisfied through the preparation of a Noise Impact Analysis included as Appendix I.
With regard to CEQA Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), the changes proposed by the
Proposed Project would not result in any new or more severe impacts with respect to noise. Therefore,
preparation of a SEIR is not warranted.
Threshold (b) Generation of, excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
No New or More Severe Impact: Construction of the Proposed Project could generate varying degrees of
groundborne vibration depending on the construction procedure and the construction equipment used.
The nearest sensitive receptor to the Project site is a residential use located approximately 340 feet west
of the Proposed Project site. The threshold at which vibration levels would result in annoyance would be
90 VdB for workshop or industrial type uses and 78 VdB for daytime residential uses. Table NOI-4 below
shows the potential construction vibration annoyance impacts at the nearest receptors.
Table NOI-4: Potential Construction Vibration Annoyance Impacts at Nearest Receptor
Receptor (Location) Reference Vibration
Level (VdB) at 25 feet1 Distance (feet)1 Composite Noise Level
(dBA Leq)
Industrial Uses (East) 87 300 55
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 90 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Industrial Uses (West) 365 52
Industrial Uses (North) 500 48
Residences (West) 550 47
Source: Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis (Appendix I)
1The reference distance is associated with the average condition, identified by the distance from the center of construction
activities to surrounding uses.
As shown in Table NOI-4, vibration levels are expected to approach 55 VdB at the closest industrial uses
to the east and 47 VdB at the closest residential uses to the west. As such, vibration generated by Project
construction would not exceed the vibration annoyance thresholds.
According to the FTA guidelines, the construction vibration damage criterion for a non-engineered timber
and masonry building is 0.2 in/sec in PPV.
Table NOI-5: Potential Construction Vibration Damage Impacts at Nearest Receptor
Receptor (Location) Reference Vibration
Level (PPV) at 25 feet1 Distance (feet) Vibration Level (PPV)
Industrial Uses (East)
0.089
120 0.008
Industrial Uses (West) 150 0.006
Industrial Uses (North) 195 0.004
Residences (West) 340 0.002
Source: Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis (Appendix I)
As shown in Table NOI-5, vibration levels are expected to approach 0.008 at the surrounding structures
and would be below the 0.2 PPV in/sec threshold. Additionally, other building structures surrounding the
Proposed Project site are farther away and would experience further reduced vibration. Therefore,
construction vibration impacts would be less than significant.
Once operational, the Proposed Project would not be a source of groundborne vibration. Due to the rapid
drop-off rate of ground-borne vibration and the short duration of the associated events, vehicular traffic-
induced ground-borne vibration is rarely perceptible beyond the roadway right-of-way, and rarely results
in vibration levels that cause damage to buildings in the vicinity. Thus, impacts relate to operational
vibration levels would be less than significant.
Mitigation Program
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
Mitigation Measures 4.7-1a to 4.7-1b listed above would further reduce groundborne vibration and noise
levels.
Conclusion
No new or more severe impacts from a previously identified significant impact evaluated in the Approved
Project FEIR would occur. Additionally, no new information of substantial importance that was not known
and could not have been known at the time the Approved Project FEIR was certified is available that would
impact the prior finding of no significant impact under this issue area.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 91 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Threshold c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan
or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or
public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels?
No New or More Severe Impact: Ontario International Airport (ONT) is located approximately 5.3 miles
west of the Proposed Project site. The majority of the SWIP Specific Plan area, including the Proposed
Project site, is located within the Airport Influence Area of the Ontario International Airport Land Use
Compatibility Plan (ALUCP). According to Policy Map 2-1 of the Ontario ALUCP, the Proposed Project site
is within the ONT Airport Influence Area; however, it is outside the 60-65 dBA CNEL noise impact zone
(Policy Map 2-3). According to Table 2-3 of the ONT ALUCP, industrial land uses exposed to noise levels
less than 60 dBA CNEL, such as the Proposed Project, are considered a normally compatible land use. In
addition, the Proposed Project does not propose or require facilities or actions that would contribute to
or exacerbate noise generated by ONT facilities and activities. Additionally, the Proposed Project site is
not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip. Accordingly, no new or more severe impact from a
previously identified significant impact evaluated in the Approved Project FEIR would occur. Additionally,
no new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known at the
time the Approved Project FEIR was certified is available that would change the impact finding.
Mitigation Program
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
None identified in the Approved Project FEIR.
Conclusion
There are no new or more severe potentially significant impacts associated with the Proposed Project;
therefore, no new and/or considerably different mitigation measures are required.
Overall Acoustical Impact Conclusion
With regard to CEQA Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), the changes proposed by the
Proposed Project would not result in any new or more severe impacts from the previously identified
impacts with respect to noise. Therefore, preparation of a SEIR is not warranted.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 92 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
4.13 Population and Housing
4.13.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
According to the Approved Project FEIR, development of the SWIP Specific Plan Update area would not
result in any impacts to existing residential units on-site. Should future development proposals result in
the potential for displacement of residential uses, each development application would be reviewed on a
case-by-case basis for impacts. In addition, any potential impacts to existing on-site housing within the
SWIP Specific Plan Update area is anticipated to occur over a long period of time, and the construction of
replacement housing would not be required. As such, the Approved Project FEIR concluded that impacts
in this regard would be less than significant and no mitigation measures were recommended.
4.13.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly;
and
Threshold (b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
No New or More Severe Impact: Population and housing stock within Fontana grew from approximately
196,069 residents to 204,900 residents between 2010 and 2020 and from 51,857 households to 53,510
households between 2010 and 201817. This is an increase of approximately 1.1 percent per year for both
household units and population.
According to the SCAG, the generation rate for employees required for operation of an industrial project
is one employee for every 1,195 SF of industrial space. As the Proposed Project would construct and
operate a 96,002 SF warehouse, operation of the Project would generate approximately 80 employees,
compared to the 137 employees that would be generated by the 163,786 SF, consistent with the
maximum development of the site pursuant to the SWIP . As such, the Proposed Project would generate
57 fewer employees than what was assumed in the Approved Project FEIR. The employees that would fill
these roles are anticipated to come from the region, therefore, implementation of the Proposed Project
would not result in unplanned population growth.
Further, the Proposed Project is consistent with the maximum allowable density in the SWIP for the SID,
as well as with the maximum intensity of new industrial square footage assumed for the SID in the
Approved Project EIR. Thus, consistent with the findings of the Approved Project EIR, impacts related to
employment growth and population growth would be less than significant.
The Proposed Project would not induce population growth through the introduction of housing because
no housing is associated with the development. Additionally, the construction of replacement housing
would not be necessary as no housing currently exists within the Project boundaries. In some cases, direct
population growth can be created through the introduction of new businesses; however, direct
population growth associated with the Proposed Project is not anticipated because the community has a
need for employment and the Proposed Project’s workforce would consist of local residents. Additionally,
17 Fontana. 2022. 6th Cycle Housing Element Update. https://www.fontana.org/DocumentCenter/View/37230/Fontana-Housing-
Element_January-2022_Clean (accessed November 10, 2022)
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 93 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
the Proposed Project would not involve any infrastructure improvements that would induce growth.
Therefore, the Proposed Project would not substantially induce population growth.
Mitigation Program
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
None identified in the Approved Project FEIR.
Overall Population and Housing Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impacts pertaining to population and
housing. With regard to CEQA Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), the changes
proposed by the Proposed Project would not result in any new or more severe impacts from the previously
identified impacts, with respect to population and housing. Therefore, preparation of a SEIR is not
warranted.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 94 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
4.14 Public Services
4.14.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The Approved Project FEIR concluded that there is potential for service needs to increase relative to fire
protection, police protection, and schools with the development/redevelopment of the SWIP Specific Plan
Update area. However, to reduce potential impacts to a less than significant impact, the Approved Project
FEIR incorporated Mitigation Measures 4.8-1a through 4.8-3f, referenced below. The Approved Project
FEIR also concluded that development of the SWIP Specific Plan Update area would not significantly
increase the demand for library services that would require construction of additional library facilities.
Nonetheless, Mitigation Measure 4.8-4a was incorporated to maintain this impact at less than significant.
4.14.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or
physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered
governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times
or other performance objectives for:
Fire protection, Police protection, Schools, and other Public Facilities?
No New or More Severe Impact: The Proposed Project does not include or require construction of any
new or physically altered fire protection, police protection, school, or other public facilities. Prior to
commencement of construction activities, the Proposed Project plans would be reviewed by applicable
local agencies to ensure compliance with the Municipal Code as well as all applicable regulations to ensure
adequate site signage, lighting, and other crime safety preventative measures. The Fontana Police
Department is located approximately four miles northeast of the Proposed Project site at 17005 Upland
Avenue, Fontana. The closest fire station is San Bernardino County Fire Station 74 at 11500 Live Oak Ave,
Fontana, located approximately two miles south of the Proposed Project site. Since the Proposed Project
site is already served by the existing fire station, and the Proposed Project would be constructed pursuant
to existing California Fire Code regulations, the Proposed Project would not result in the need for new or
physically altered fire department facilities that could cause significant environmental impacts.
Additionally, since the Proposed Project site is already served by the existing police station, and the
Proposed Project would include security lighting and other security measures, the Proposed Project would
not result in the need for new or physically altered police facilities that could cause significant
environmental impacts.
The Proposed Project site is located within the limits of the SWIP Specific Plan Update area and is
consistent with the SWIP. Accordingly, no new or more severe impact relative to public services or a
substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified significant impact evaluated in the Approved
Project FEIR would occur. The Proposed Project does not have a residential component and would
therefore not directly introduce new residents to the City that would require public services, such as
school or other public facility services.
Construction of the Proposed Project would not result in adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of or need for new or physically altered public facilities, and would not adversely affect service
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 95 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
ratios, response times, or other performance objectives. Compliance with applicable local regulations will
ensure that Proposed Project construction will result in a less than significant impact to public services.
No new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known at the
time the Approved Project FEIR was certified is available. Although impacts to public facilities and services
is anticipated to be low, with implementation of the Approved Project FEIR mitigation measures,
referenced below, the Proposed Project would result in a less than significant impact to fire protection,
police protection, schools, and other public facilities. Lastly, development impact fees would aid in
offsetting any potential impacts.
Mitigation Program
The Approved Project FEIR includes measures to reduce potential impacts associated with the
implementation of the Approved Project. The following measures from the FEIR are applicable to the
Proposed Project:
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
The mitigation measures below are listed in the Approved Project FEIR; however, these are goals/policies
to be implemented by the City, not the Proposed Project.
4.8-1a The City shall continue to work towards a ratio of 1.4 sworn officers per 1,000 residents.
4.8-1b The Fontana Police Department shall continue to expand its Area Commander Program
to more effectively serve specific areas of the City.
4.8-1c The Fontana Police Department shall expand its Contact Stations to more effectively serve
outlying areas.
4.8-1d The Fontana Police Department shall continue its School Resource Officer Program on all
current and future middle school campuses.
4.8-1e The Fontana Police Department shall continue its extensive volunteer crime prevention
programs, including Citizen Volunteers, Explorers, Citizens on Patrol, Neighborhood
Watch, Police Reserves, and Community Emergency.
4.8-1f The Fontana Police Department shall continue its bilingual incentive program to more
effectively serve the Latino community.
4.8-1g The City shall maintain an average police and fire response time of four to five minutes.
4.8-1h The City shall continue to promote the establishment of Neighborhood Watch programs
in residential neighborhoods, aimed at encouraging neighborhoods to form associations
to patrol or watch for any suspicious activity.
4.8-1i The City shall incorporate appropriate staffing levels in the annual budget process keyed
to City growth in population and employment.
4.8-2a The City shall maintain an average fire response time of four to five minutes.
4.8-2b The City shall continue to maintain an Insurance Service office (ISO) fire rating of Class 3.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 96 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
4.8-2c The City shall ensure that new fire stations are built in areas of new development so that
response times are not eroded.
4.8-3a Planning and development in the City shall continue to be integrated with the needs of
school districts for new facilities.
4.8-3b The City shall continue to support local school districts in their efforts to obtain additional
funding sources, including special assessment districts and supplementary state and
federal funding.
4.8-3c The City shall establish and maintain effective joint use agreements with school districts
serving the community to achieve optimum, cost-effective use of school facilities.
4.8-3d The City shall continue to withhold building permits until verification that applicable
school fees have been collected by the appropriate school district.
4.8-3e The City shall collaborate with school districts in designing adjacent school/recreation
facilities to achieve maximum usability and cost-effectiveness for both the City and the
school districts.
4.8-3f The City shall collaborate with school districts in expanding educational opportunities and
programs that benefit from City facilities.
4.8-4a As part of future development and infrastructure projects within the Specific Plan Update
area, the City shall continue to explore options to provide additional library service,
through the Fontana Unified School district (FUSD) joint use agreements and/or City-
sponsored facilities using General Fund or other revenue sources.
Overall Public Services Impact Conclusion
With regard to CEQA Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), the changes proposed by the
Proposed Project would not result in any new or more severe impacts from the previously identified
impacts with respect to public services. Therefore, preparation of a SEIR is not warranted.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 97 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
4.15 Recreation
4.15.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The Approved Project FEIR concluded that future development associated with the SWIP Specific Plan
Update could result in a significant and unavoidable impact to parks and recreation due to future
industrial, commercial, and office development. The Proposed Project could create employment
opportunities within the SWIP Specific Plan Update area. In turn, this employment growth could lead to a
population increase within the City and an associated increase in demand for parks and recreational
facilities. To reduce potential impacts, the Approved Project FEIR incorporated Mitigation Measures 4.8-
5a through 4.8-5g.
4.15.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated; or
Threshold (b) Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational
facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
No New or More Severe Impact: The Approved Project FEIR determined that impacts to parks and
recreational uses would be significant and unavoidable. Because the Proposed Project is a permitted by
right in the SID, the Approved Project FEIR has previously analyzed and accounted for this type of
development on the site and appropriate mitigation measures have been incorporated to reduce any
impact caused to recreational facilities. As previously noted in Population and Housing, it is anticipated
that the labor force would come mostly from within the City or immediate surrounding communities. The
Proposed Project is not anticipated to substantially increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional
parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur
or be accelerated, nor would it include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. A less than
significant impact would occur. The Proposed Project would be required to implement the following
mitigation measures from the Approved Project FEIR, but the impact from full buildout of the SWIP would
remain significant and unavoidable.
Mitigation Program
The FEIR includes measures to reduce potential impacts associated the implementation of the Approved
Project. The following measures from the FEIR are applicable to the Proposed Project:
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
The below mitigation measures are listed in the Approved Project FEIR; however, these are goals/policies
to be implemented by the City, not the Proposed Project.
4.8-5a A wide variety of parks and recreation facilities, including regional, community,
neighborhood and sub-neighborhood parks, shall be provided throughout the City.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 98 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
4.8-5b The design of all parks shall meet the particular needs of the specialized populations they
serve, such as seniors, young adults, families, and children.
4.8-5c Barrier-free access to all parks shall be provided.
4.8-5d The park standards for the City shall be two-acres per thousand residents for community
parks and three-acres per thousand for neighborhood parks.
4.8-5e Each park within the City shall provide a variety of activity options for users, including
active and passive uses.
4.8-5f The City shall reevaluate the design of each of its parks as part of the periodic update of
its Parks, Recreation, and Trails Master Plan. [GPEIR MM PR-6] 4.8-5g Each park within
the City shall be evaluated for safety on a periodic basis.
Overall Public Services Impact Conclusion
With regard to CEQA Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), the changes proposed by the
Proposed Project would not result in any new or more severe impacts from the previously identified
significant and unavoidable impacts with respect to parks and recreation. Therefore, preparation of a SEIR
is not warranted.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 99 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
4.16 Transportation
4.16.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The revised CEQA Guidelines include a new separate discussion for vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Although
not addressed as a separate threshold, the Approved Project FEIR analyzed VMT as part of air quality and
greenhouse gas (GHG) modeling and the Approved Project FEIR concluded that implementation of the
SWIP Specific Plan would result in less than significant impacts with the incorporation of mitigation
relative to GHG emissions but significant and unavoidable impacts from cumulative GHG emissions. The
Approved Project FEIR concluded that implementation of the SWIP Specific Plan would result in significant
and unavoidable impacts relative to air quality for both short and long-term air quality as well as
consistency with the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP).
The Approved Project FEIR concluded that the implementation of the SWIP Specific Plan Update would
lead to less than significant impacts in relation to roadway hazards and emergency access. Common
construction practices such as public access restrictions, construction signage, and flagmen would be
implemented to minimize hazard risks. A Traffic Management Plan is required for all projects that propose
construction activities in a public right-of-way (Mitigation Measures 4.9-1a through 4.9-1nn). The Traffic
Management Plan is reviewed by the City’s Engineering department and must include provisions for
construction safety and emergency access. Implementation of a Traffic Management Plan was found to
be sufficient to minimize impacts to both hazards and emergency access.
The Approved Project FEIR also concluded that the implementation of the SWIP Specific Plan Update
would cause an increase in traffic that exceeded the load capacity of surrounding streets. A deficiency was
identified in 10 roadway segments and 19 intersections within the Specific Plan Update area. These
potential impacts were anticipated to be reduced to less than significant levels following the roadway
upgrades included in the proposed mitigation measures. However, the majority of the improvements
identified as mitigation measures were unfunded or partially funded, therefore, their implementation
remained unassured. As a result, it was determined that these mitigation measures were infeasible, and
impacts related to increased roadway traffic were considered to be significant and unavoidable. A Trip
Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Analysis was prepared by EPD Solutions, Inc., on
September 30, 2022, which have been incorporated as Appendix J18 and Appendix K, respectively.
4.16.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Conflict with program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system,
including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
No New or More Severe Impact:
The Proposed Project involves the construction of a 96,002 SF warehouse building. The primary patrons
of the proposed development would be warehouse employees. Vehicular traffic to and from the Project
site would utilize the existing network of regional and local roadways that currently serve the Project area.
18 Note: The Trip Generation Analysis modeled the Project using a previous version of the site plan in which the proposed
warehouse totaled 96,100 SF. Thus, the analysis contained herein is more conservative than the proposed Project's 96,002 SF
warehouse.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 100 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
A Project Trip Generation and VMT Screening Analysis (Appendix J) was prepared to determine the
estimated change in site trip generation resulting from the Proposed Project compared to the Approved
Project FEIR. Table TRA-1 presents the trip generation estimate for the Proposed Project. Table TRA-2
presents the trip generation for the Approved Project.
Table TRA-1: Proposed Project Trip Generation
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Land Use Units Daily In Out Total In Out Total
Trip Rates
Warehousing (ITE 8th Edition)1 TSF 3.56 0.24 0.06 0.30 0.08 0.24 0.32
Warehousing (ITE 11th Edition)2 TSF 1.71 0.13 0.04 0.17 0.05 0.13 0.18
Project Trip Generation using ITE 8th Edition Rates
Warehouse1
96.10
0 TSF 342 23 6 29 8 23 31
Vehicle Mix3 Percent
Passenger Vehicles 72.50% 248 17 4 21 6 17 22
2-Axle Trucks 4.60% 16 1 0 1 0 1 1
3-Axle Trucks 5.70% 20 1 0 2 0 1 2
4+-Axle Trucks 17.20% 59 4 1 5 1 4 5
100% 342 23 6 29 8 23 31
Project Trip Generation using ITE 11th Edition Rates
Warehouse2
96.10
0 TSF 164 13 4 16 5 12 17
Vehicle Mix3 Percent
Passenger Vehicles 72.50% 119 9 3 12 4 9 13
2-Axle Trucks 4.60% 8 1 0 1 0 1 1
3-Axle Trucks 5.70% 9 1 0 1 0 1 1
4+-Axle Trucks 17.20% 28 2 1 3 1 2 3
100% 164 13 4 16 5 12 17
TSF = Thousand Square Feet
1 Trip rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition, 2008.
2 Trip rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation –anual,11th Edition, 2021. Land Use Code 150 - Warehousing.
3 Vehicle Mix from the SCAQMD Warehouse Truck Trip Study Data Results and Usage (2014) without cold storage.
Table TRA-2: Approved SWIP Trip Generation
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Land Use Units Daily In Out Total In Out Total
Trip Rates
Warehousing (ITE 8th Edition)1 TSF 3.56 0.24 0.06 0.30 0.08 0.24 0.32
Warehousing (ITE 11th Edition)2 TSF 1.71 0.13 0.04 0.17 0.05 0.13 0.18
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 101 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Previous Site Trip Generation using ITE 8th Edition Rates
Warehouse1 163.629 TSF 583 39 10 49 13 39 52
Vehicle Mix3 Percent
Passenger Vehicles 72.50% 422 28 7 36 9 28 38
2-Axle Trucks 4.60% 27 2 0 2 1 2 2
3-Axle Trucks 5.70% 33 2 1 3 1 2 3
4+-Axle Trucks 17.20% 100 7 2 8 2 7 9
100% 583 39 10 49 13 39 52
Previous Site Trip Generation using ITE 11th Edition Rates
Warehouse2 163.629 TSF 280 21 6 28 8 21 29
Vehicle Mix3 Percent
Passenger Vehicles 72.50% 203 16 5 20 6 15 21
2-Axle Trucks 4.60% 13 1 0 1 0 1 1
3-Axle Trucks 5.70% 16 1 0 2 0 1 2
4+-Axle Trucks 17.20% 48 4 1 5 1 4 5
100% 280 21 6 28 8 21 29
TSF = Thousand Square Feet
1 Trip rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition, 2008.
2 Trip rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual,11th Edition, 2021. Land Use Code 150 - Warehousing.
3 Vehicle Mix from the SCAQMD Warehouse Truck Trip Study Data Results and Usage (2014) without cold storage.
As shown in Table TRA-1 and TRA-2, the Proposed Project would result in 164 daily trips using the 11th
edition ITE rates (Land Use Code 150 – Warehouse) and the approved SWIP use would result in 280 trips
using the same 11th edition ITE rates. Thus, the Proposed Project would result in 116 fewer trips in
comparison to the maximum intensity allowed in the SWIP. Vehicular access to the Project site would be
provided via the western driveway on Valley Boulevard. Vehicular traffic to and from the Project site
would utilize the existing network of regional and local roadways that currently serve the Project area.
The Project would construct internal roadways that would provide employee access to the warehouse
building. In addition, final design plans would be subject to review and approval by the City’s Public Works
Department prior to the issuance of building permits. As such, the Project would not introduce any new
roadways or land uses that would interfere with adopted plans, programs, ordinances, or policies
regarding roadway facilities.
Alternative Transportation
Sidewalks currently exist along the Project site’s Valley Boulevard frontage and would not be changed
with implementation of the Project. No bicycle facilities currently exist within the vicinity of the Project
site. According to Fontana General Plan Exhibit 9.6 Bicycle Facilities in Fontana, Class II bike lanes are
proposed along Cherry Avenue. Fontana is served by Omnitrans, with 10 bus routes, and the Victor Valley
Transit Authority, which provides commuter bus service to Barstow and Victorville. The Project would be
located approximately 0.5-mile south from Omnitrans Bus Route 61, which is located along San
Bernardino Avenue. Additionally, Metrolink provides passenger rail service to Los Angeles, Orange,
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 102 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego and Ventura counties from downtown. The Fontana Metrolink
station is located approximately 3.9 roadway miles east of the Project site. The Project would not disrupt
service of the Omnitrans Bus Route or the Metrolink line. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with
alternative transportation and Project impacts to transit, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities would be less
than significant.
Threshold (b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3,
subdivision (b)?
No New or More Severe Impact:
Vehicle Miles Traveled:
Senate Bill (SB) 743 was signed by Governor Brown in 2013 and required the Governor’s Office of Planning
and Research (OPR) to amend the CEQA Guidelines to provide an alternative to LOS for evaluating
transportation impacts. SB 743 specified that the new criteria should promote the reduction of GHGs, the
development of multimodal transportation networks and a diversity of land uses. In response, Section
15064.3 was added to the CEQA Guidelines.
As described previously, the allowable maximum buildout of the Project site within the SWIP is 163,786
of industrial uses, which is 67,784 SF greater than the Proposed Project; the Proposed Project includes a
96,002 SF warehouse building, inclusive of a 3,750 SF office and a 3,750 SF mezzanine. The Proposed
Project trip generation is shown in Table TRA-1 and the approved SWIP use trip generation is shown in
Table TRA-2. As shown in Table TRA-1 and TRA-2, the Proposed Project would result in 164 daily trips using
the 11th edition ITE rates (Land Use Code 150 – Warehouse) and the approved SWIP use would result in
280 trips using the same 11th edition ITE rates. Thus, the Proposed Project would result in 116 fewer trips
in comparison to the Approved Project FEIR. According to the City’s Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines,
projects which would generate fewer than 500 average daily trips (ADT) would not cause a substantial
increase in the total citywide or regional VMT and are thus screened out from further VMT analysis. As
described previously, the Proposed Project would generate 164 daily trips (116 fewer trips compared to
the SWIP maximum intensity). Thus, it is presumed to have a less than significant impact on VMT and
further analysis is not required. Thus, the Proposed Project would not result in a new or more severe
significant impact related to VMT.
In addition, based on the 11th edition peak hour trip generation of the Proposed Project use (Land Use
Code 150 – Warehouse), the Proposed Project would not meet the City’s threshold for preparation of a
LOS Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). It should be noted that the Proposed Project would pay all applicable
traffic impact fees, which would be used to fund the local and regional transportation system (Appendix
J). These fees are intended to mitigate the cumulative traffic effects of land development projects. The
Proposed Project would be required to implement the following mitigation measures from the Approved
Project FEIR but the impact associated with buildout of the entire SWIP would remain significant and
unavoidable.
Mitigation Program
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 103 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
There are no new or more severe significant impacts associated with the Proposed Project; therefore, no
new mitigation measures are required for issues related to transportation. The FEIR includes measures to
reduce potential impacts associated the implementation of the Approved Project.
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
Forecast Existing with Project Conditions
The following mitigation measures from the Approved Project FEIR were intended to achieve acceptable
operations at the deficient roadway segments for forecast existing with the Approved Project conditions.
However, the mitigation measures shown below did not apply to the Proposed Project site because the
Approved Project TIA found that based on the City’s LOS standards and significant impact criteria, the
mitigation measures would be implemented for significant LOS impacts. Since the Proposed Project
screens out of LOS and does not contribute enough trips to significantly impact any of the intersections
or segments as shown in Appendix L, the Proposed Project would not be considered significant at the
study intersections. Similarly, because the Proposed Project would have a negative trip generation
compared to the Approved Project (as shown on Table TRA-2), the mitigation measures are not applicable
to the Proposed Project.
4.9-1a Mulberry Avenue – Consistent with City of Fontana Circulation Master Plan, construct
Mulberry Avenue connection from Slover Avenue to Valley Boulevard over I-10 freeway.
This improvement is identified to provide additional north-south capacity, reducing
forecast traffic on Etiwanda Avenue and Cherry Avenue.
4.9-1b Beech Avenue – Consistent with City of Fontana Circulation Master Plan, construct Beech
Avenue from Slover Avenue to Valley Boulevard including an interchange with I-10. This
improvement is consistent with City of Fontana Circulation Master Plan. This
improvement is identified to provide additional north-south capacity and freeway access,
reducing forecast traffic on Cherry Avenue and Citrus Avenue.
4.9-1c Jurupa Street between Etiwanda Avenue and Mulberry Avenue – Consistent with the City
of Fontana Circulation Master Plan, widen the study roadway segment from a 4-lane
divided roadway segment to a 6-lane divided roadway segment. This improvement is
included in the City of Fontana 7-Year Capital Improvement Program, but is not yet fully
funded.
4.9-1d Mulberry Avenue between Slover Avenue and Jurupa Avenue – Consistent with the City
of Fontana Circulation Master Plan, widen the study roadway segment from a 2-lane
undivided roadway segment to a 4-lane undivided roadway segment.
4.9-1e Jurupa Street between Mulberry Avenue and Cherry Avenue – Consistent with the City of
Fontana Circulation Master Plan, widen the study roadway segment from a 4-lane divided
roadway to a 6-lane divided roadway. This improvement is included in the City of Fontana
7-Year Capital Improvement Program, but is not yet fully funded.
4.9-1f Beech Avenue between Slover Avenue and Jurupa Street – Consistent with the City of
Fontana Circulation Master Plan, widen the study roadway segment from a 2-lane divided
roadway to a 4-lane divided roadway.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 104 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
4.9-1g Citrus Avenue between I-10 Eastbound Ramps and Santa Ana Avenue – Consistent with
the City of Fontana Circulation Master Plan, widen the study roadway segment from a 2-
lane undivided roadway segment to a 4-lane undivided roadway segment.
4.9-1h Citrus Avenue between Santa Ana Avenue and Jurupa Street – Consistent with the City of
Fontana Circulation Master Plan, widen the study roadway segment from a 2-lane
undivided roadway segment to a 4-lane undivided roadway segment.
The following mitigation measures from the Approved Project FEIR were intended to achieve acceptable
operations at the deficient intersections for forecast existing with Approved Project conditions. The
mitigation measures shown below did not apply to the Proposed Project site because the Approved
Project TIA found that based on the City’s LOS standards and significant impact criteria, the mitigation
measures would be implemented for significant LOS impacts. Since the Proposed Project screens out of
LOS and does not contribute enough trips to significantly impact any of the intersections or segments, as
shown in Appendix L, the Proposed Project would not be considered significant at the study intersections.
Similarly, because the Proposed Project would have a negative trip generation compared to the Approved
Project (as shown on Table TRA-2), the mitigation measures are not applicable to the Proposed Project.
4.9-1i Etiwanda Avenue/San Bernardino Avenue – Widen the northbound Etiwanda Avenue
approach from two left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane to consist
of two left-turn lanes, three through lanes, and one right-turn lane. Widen the westbound
San Bernardino Avenue approach from two left-turn lanes, one through lane, and one
shared through/right-turn lane to consist of two left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and
one right-turn lane. Additionally, modify the westbound San Bernardino Avenue signal
phasing to include a westbound right-turn overlap, which will preclude U-turn movement
from southbound to northbound Etiwanda Avenue.
4.9-1j Etiwanda Avenue/East Airport Drive-Slover Avenue – Widen the northbound Etiwanda
Avenue approach from one left-turn lane, one through lane, and one shared
through/right-turn lane to consist of two left-turn lanes, one through lane, and one
shared through/right-turn lane. Widen the southbound Etiwanda Avenue approach from
one left-turn lane, one through lane, and one shared through/right-turn lane to consist of
two left-turn lanes, one through lane, and one shared through/right-turn lane. Widen the
westbound Slover Avenue approach from one left-turn lane, one through lane, and one
shared through/right-turn lane to consist of one left-turn lane, two through lanes, and
two right-turn lanes.
4.9-1k Etiwanda Avenue/Jurupa Street – Widen the eastbound Jurupa Street approach from two
left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane to consist of two left-turn lanes,
three through lanes, and one right-turn lane. Widen the westbound Jurupa Street
approach from two left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane to consist
of two left-turn lanes, three through lanes, and one right-turn lane.
4.9-1l Mulberry Avenue/Slover Avenue – In concert with construction of the extension of
Mulberry Avenue north of Slover Avenue, widen the northbound Mulberry Avenue
approach from one left-turn lane and one right-turn lane to consist of one left-turn lane,
two through lanes, and one right-turn lane. Construct and stripe the southbound
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 105 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Mulberry Avenue approach to consist of one left-turn lane, two through lanes, and one
right-turn lane. Widen the eastbound Slover Avenue approach from two through lanes
and one shared through/right-turn lane to consist of one left-turn lane, two through
lanes, and one shared through/right-turn lane. Widen the westbound Slover Avenue
approach from one left-turn lane and two through lanes to consist of one left-turn lane,
two through lanes, and one right-turn lane. Additionally, modify the signal phasing to
consist of protected left-turn phasing.
4.9-1m Mulberry Avenue/Santa Ana Avenue – Widen the northbound Mulberry Avenue approach
from one left-turn lane, one through lane, and one right-turn lane to consist of one left-
turn lane, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane. Re-stripe the eastbound Santa Ana
Avenue approach from one shared left-turn/through lane and one right-turn lane to
consist of one left-turn lane and one shared through/right-turn lane. Widen the
westbound Santa Ana Avenue approach from one shared left-turn/ through/right-turn
lane to consist of one left-turn lane, one through lane, and one shared through/right-turn
lane. Additionally, modify the east-west signal phasing from permitted left-turns to
protected left-turns.
4.9-1n Mulberry Avenue/Jurupa Street – Modify the northbound Mulberry Avenue signal
phasing to include a northbound right-turn overlap, which will preclude U-turn movement
from westbound to eastbound Jurupa Street. Widen the southbound Mulberry Avenue
approach from one left-turn lane, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane to consist
of two left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane. Additionally, modify
the southbound Mulberry Avenue signal phasing to include a southbound right-turn
overlap, which will preclude U-turn movement from eastbound to westbound Jurupa
Avenue. Widen the eastbound Jurupa Street approach from one left-turn lane, two
through lanes, and one right-turn lane to consist of two left-turn lanes, three through
lanes, and one right-turn lane. Widen the westbound Jurupa Avenue approach from one
left-turn lane, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane to consist of two left-turn lanes,
three through lanes, and one right-turn lane.
4.9-1o Banana Avenue/Valley Boulevard – Signalize the Banana Avenue/Valley Boulevard
intersection. According to the City of Fontana, the Banana Avenue/Valley Boulevard
satisfies traffic signal warrants and is in the pre-construction phase.
4.9-1p Cherry Avenue/Valley Boulevard – Widen the northbound Cherry Avenue approach from
one left-turn lane, two through lanes, and one defacto right-turn lane to consist of one
left-turn lane, three through lanes, and one right-turn lane. Widen the southbound Cherry
Avenue approach from one left-turn lane, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane to
consist of one left-turn lane, three through lanes, and one right-turn lane. Widen the
westbound Valley Boulevard approach from one left-turn lane, two through lanes, and
one right-turn lane to consist of two left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and one right-turn
lane.
4.9-1q Cherry Avenue/Slover Avenue – Widen the northbound Cherry Avenue approach from
one left-turn lane, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane to consist of one left-turn
lane, four through lanes and one right-turn lane. Widen the southbound Cherry Avenue
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 106 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
approach from one left-turn lane, one through lane, and one shared through/right-turn
lane to consist of two left-turn lanes, four through lanes, and two right-turn lanes. Widen
the eastbound Slover Avenue approach from one left-turn lane, two through lanes, and
one defacto right-turn lane to consist of two left-turn lanes, three through lanes, and one
right-turn lane. Widen the westbound Slover Avenue approach from one left-turn lane,
two through lanes, and one right-turn lane to consist of two left-turn lanes, three through
lanes, and two right-turn lanes.
4.9-1r Cherry Avenue/Jurupa Street – Widen the northbound Cherry Avenue approach from two
left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane to consist of two left-turn lanes,
three through lanes, and one right-turn lane. Widen the southbound Cherry Avenue
approach from two left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane to consist
of two left-turn lanes, three through lanes, and two right-turn lanes. Widen the
eastbound Jurupa Avenue approach from two left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and one
shared through/right-turn lane to consist of two left-turn lanes, three through lanes, and
one right-turn lane. Widen the westbound Jurupa Street approach from two left-turn
lanes, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane to consist of two left-turn lanes, three
through lanes, and one right-turn lane.
4.9-1s Beech Avenue/Valley Boulevard – Signalize the Beech Avenue/Valley Boulevard
intersection. Widen the northbound Beech Avenue approach from one shared left-turn/
through lane and one right-turn lane to consist of one left-turn lane, one through lane,
and one shared through/right-turn lane. Widen the southbound Beech Avenue approach
from one shared left-turn/through lane and one right-turn lane to consist of one left-turn
lane, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane.
4.9-1t Beech Avenue/Slover Avenue – Signalize the Beech Avenue/Slover Avenue intersection.
Widen the northbound Beech Avenue approach from one shared left-turn/through/right-
turn lane to consist of one left-turn lane, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane.
Widen the southbound Beech Avenue approach from one shared left-turn/through/right-
turn lane to consist of one left-turn lane, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane.
Widen the eastbound Slover Avenue approach from one left-turn lane, one through lane,
and one shared through/right-turn lane to consist of two left-turn lanes, three through
lanes, and one right-turn lane. Widen the westbound Slover Avenue approach from one
left-turn lane, one through lane, and one shared through/right-turn lane to consist of one
left-turn lane, three through lanes, and one right-turn lane.
4.9-1u Beech Avenue/Santa Ana Avenue – Signalize the Beech Avenue/Santa Ana Avenue
intersection.
4.9-1v Beech Avenue/Jurupa Street – Signalize the Beech Avenue/Jurupa Street intersection.
Widen the eastbound Jurupa Street approach from one shared left-turn/through lane and
one shared through/right-turn lane to consist of one left-turn lane, two through lanes,
and one right-turn lane. Widen the westbound Jurupa Street approach from one shared
left-turn/through/right-turn lane to consist of one left-turn lane, two through lanes, and
one right-turn lane.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 107 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
4.9-1w Citrus Avenue/Valley Boulevard – Widen the northbound Citrus Avenue approach from
one left-turn lane, one through lane, and one shared through/right-turn lane to consist of
two left-turn lanes, one through lane, and one shared through/right-turn lane. Widen the
southbound Citrus Avenue approach from one left-turn lane, one through lane, and one
shared through/right-turn lane to consist of one left-turn lane, two through lanes, and
one right-turn lane. Widen the eastbound Valley Boulevard approach from two left-turn
lanes, one through lane, and one shared through/right-turn lane to consist of two left-
turn lanes, two through lanes, and two right-turn lanes.
4.9-1x Citrus Avenue/Slover Avenue – Widen the northbound Citrus Avenue approach from one
left-turn lane and one shared through/right-turn lane to consist of one left-turn lane, two
through lanes, and one right-turn lane. Widen the southbound Citrus Avenue approach
from one left-turn lane, one through lane, and one right-turn lane to consist of one left-
turn lane, two through lanes, and two right-turn lanes. Widen the eastbound Slover
Avenue approach from one left-turn lane, two through lanes, and one defacto right-turn
lane to consist of two left-turn lanes, three through lanes, and one right-turn lane. Widen
the westbound Slover Avenue approach from one left-turn lane, one through lane, and
one shared through/right-turn lane to consist of one left-turn lane, three through lanes,
and one right-turn lane.
4.9-1y Citrus Avenue/Santa Ana Avenue – Signalize the Citrus Avenue/Santa Ana Avenue
intersection. Widen the northbound Citrus Avenue approach from one shared left-
turn/through/right-turn lane to consist of one left-turn lane and one shared
through/right-turn lane. Widen the southbound Citrus Avenue approach from one shared
left-turn/through/right-turn lane to consist of one left-turn lane and one shared
through/right-turn lane. Widen the eastbound Santa Ana Avenue approach from one
shared left-turn/through/right-turn lane to consist of one left-turn lane and one shared
through/right-turn lane. Re-stripe the westbound Santa Ana Avenue approach from one
shared left-turn/through lane and one right-turn lane to consist of one left-turn lane and
one shared through/right-turn lane.
4.9-1z Citrus Avenue/Jurupa Street – Signalize the Citrus Avenue/Jurupa Street intersection.
Widen the southbound Citrus Avenue approach from one left-turn lane and one shared
through/right-turn lane to consist of one left-turn lane, one through lane, and one shared
through/right-turn lane. Widen the eastbound Jurupa Street approach from one left-turn
lane, two through lanes, and one shared through/right-turn lane to consist of one left-
turn lane, three through lanes, and one right-turn lane. Widen the westbound Jurupa
Street approach from one left-turn lane, one through lane, and one shared through/right-
turn lane to consist of one left-turn lane, three through lanes, and one right-turn lane.
4.9-1aa Sierra Avenue/Slover Avenue – Widen the eastbound Slover Avenue approach from two
left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane to consist of two left-turn lanes,
three through lanes, and one right-turn lane.
4.9-1bb Sierra Avenue/Jurupa Street – Widen the southbound Sierra Avenue approach from two
left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane to consist of two left-turn lane,
two through lanes, and two right-turn lanes. Widen the eastbound Jurupa Street
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 108 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
approach from one left-turn lane, one shared left-turn/through lane, one through lane,
and one right-turn lane to consist of two left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and one right-
turn lane. Widen the westbound Jurupa Street approach from one left-turn lane, one
through lane, and one right-turn lane to consist of one left-turn lane, three through lanes,
and one right-turn lane. Improvements have recently been constructed at this
intersection satisfying the lane configuration recommended.
4.9-1cc Armstrong Road/SR-60 Eastbound Ramps – Contribute towards preparation of a Project
Study Report to improve operations, circulation, and access at the Armstrong Road/SR-
60 interchange.
Forecast Year 2030 with Approved Project Conditions
The following mitigation measures from the Approved Project FEIR were intended to achieve acceptable
operations at the deficient roadway segments for the forecast year 2030 with Approved Project
conditions. The mitigation measures shown below did not apply to the Proposed Project site because the
Approved Project TIA found that based on the City’s LOS standards and significant impact criteria, the
mitigation measures would be implemented for significant LOS impacts. Since the Propsoed Project
screens out of LOS and does not contribute enough trips to significantly impact any of the intersections
or segments as shown in Appendix L, the Proposed Project would not be considered significant at the
study intersections. Similarly, because the Proposed Project would have a negative trip generation
compared to the Approved Project (as shown on Table TRA-2), the mitigation measures are not applicable
to the Proposed Project.
4.9-1dd Cypress Avenue – Consistent with City of Fontana Circulation Master Plan, construct
Cypress Avenue from Slover Avenue to Valley Boulevard over I-10 freeway. This
improvement is consistent with City of Fontana Circulation Master Plan. This
improvement is identified to provide additional north-south capacity, reducing forecast
traffic on Cherry Avenue and Citrus Avenue.
4.9-1ee Country Village Road between Philadelphia Avenue and SR-60 Westbound Ramps –
Consistent with the County of Riverside Circulation Master Plan, widen the study roadway
segment from a 4-lane undivided roadway segment to a 6-lane divided roadway segment.
Since this improvement is within the jurisdiction of the recently incorporated City of
Jurupa Valley, implementation by the City of Fontana cannot be assured. Therefore, this
improvement shall be included in the planning and collection of fees and coordination
with the appropriate lead agency shall occur to administer the improvement.
4.9-1ff San Bernardino Avenue between Cherry Avenue and Fontana Avenue – Consistent with
the City of Fontana Circulation Master Plan, widen the study roadway segment from a 2-
lane divided roadway to a 4-lane divided roadway. Since this improvement is within the
jurisdiction of the County of San Bernardino, implementation by the City of Fontana
cannot be assured. Therefore, this improvement shall be included in the planning and
collection of fees and coordination with the appropriate lead agency shall occur to
administer the improvement.
4.9-1gg Jurupa Street between Cherry Avenue and Citrus Avenue – Consistent with the City of
Fontana Circulation Master Plan, widen the study roadway segment from a 5-lane divided
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 109 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
roadway to a 6-lane divided roadway. A portion of this improvement has recently been
implemented by the City of Fontana providing the capacity for a 6-lane roadway between
Poplar Avenue and Citrus Avenue.
4.9-1hh Jurupa Street between Citrus Avenue and Sierra Avenue – Consistent with the City of
Fontana Circulation Master Plan, widen the study roadway segment from a 5-lane divided
roadway to a 6-lane divided roadway. This improvement has recently been implemented
by the City of Fontana providing the capacity for a 6-lane roadway between Citrus Avenue
and Sierra Avenue.
The following mitigation measures from the Approved Project FEIR were intended to achieve acceptable
operations at the deficient intersection for the forecast year 2030 with Approved Project conditions. The
mitigation measures shown below did not apply to the Proposed Project site because the Approved
Project TIA found that based on the City’s LOS standards and significant impact criteria, the mitigation
measures would be implemented for significant LOS impacts. Since the Proposed Project screens out of
LOS and does not contribute enough trips to significantly impact any of the intersections or segments as
shown in Appendix L, the Proposed Project would not be considered significant at the study intersections.
Similarly, because the Proposed Project would have a negative trip generation compared to the Approved
Project (as shown on Table TRA-2), the mitigation measures are not applicable to the Proposed Project.
4.9-1ii I-15 Southbound Ramps/Jurupa Street – Widen the southbound I-15 Southbound Off-
Ramp from one left-turn lane, one shared left-turn/through/right-turn lane, and one
right-turn lane to consist of two left-turn lanes, one through lane, and one right-turn lane.
4.9-1jj Commerce Way/Ontario Mills Parkway – Widen the northbound Commerce Way
approach from two left-turn lanes, one through lane, and one right-turn lane.
4.9-1kk Cherry Avenue/San Bernardino Avenue – Widen the eastbound San Bernardino Avenue
approach from one left-turn lane, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane to consist
of two left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane.
4.9-1ll Cherry Avenue/Santa Ana Avenue – Widen the southbound Cherry Avenue approach
from one left-turn lane, two through lanes, and one shared through/right-turn lane to
consist of one left-turn lane, three through lanes, and one right-turn lane.
4.9-1mm Prior to issuance of a grading permit, applicants for future development associated with
the proposed project shall prepare site-specific traffic studies, to the satisfaction of the
City’s Engineering Department. As determined by these subsequent traffic studies, traffic
improvements identified as mitigation measures in this Program EIR shall be implemented
as a condition of the approved future development project, either through direct
construction by the project applicant and/or through development impact fees.
[This mitigation measure has been accomplished through preparation of this Addendum
EIR and related transportation studies].
4.9-1nn The City of Fontana shall perform monitoring of traffic generation and phasing of
development within the project area to defer or eliminate identified improvements due
to potential circulation impact changes or reduced land use intensities. This monitoring
shall be achieved through project-specific traffic studies tied to future development
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 110 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
within the Specific Plan Update area with land use in excess of 100,000 square feet of
non-residential land use
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impact as it pertains to conflict with a
program, plan, ordinance, policy, or guideline addressing the circulation system, including transit,
roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities. No new or more severe impacts from a previously identified
significant and unavoidable impact evaluated in the Approved FEIR would occur. Additionally, no new
information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known at the time
the Approved Project FEIR was certified is available that would impact the prior findings under this issue
area.
Threshold (c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment).
No New or More Severe Impact: Proposed Project construction activities could require the restriction of
public access during construction. Standard construction safety measures would be applied which would
include appropriate signage and flagmen visible to approaching motorists and pedestrians indicating
access options and warnings. Because the Proposed Project would impact a public right-of-way, a Traffic
Management Plan would be created and include further provisions to minimize risks during Proposed
Project construction.
Proposed Project geometric design features, including the two entrances and internal driveway system,
have been designed to meet the standards for the turning radii of large truck with trailers. This is also
beneficial for the access of emergency response equipment, including a ladder fire truck. The Proposed
Project area is currently used as a truck and trailer sales yard and no agricultural activities occur in the
Proposed Project area; therefore, there would be no incompatible use with farm equipment.
Two driveways would be incorporated into the Proposed Project design along Valley Boulevard. These
driveways would allow traffic to safely enter and exit the Proposed Project site. The Proposed Project
would therefore generate a less than significant traffic hazard impact, and no mitigation would be
required.
Mitigation Program
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
None identified in the Approved Project FEIR.
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no or more severe new impact as it pertains to geometric design
features or incompatible uses. No new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously
identified significant impact evaluated in the Approved Project FEIR would occur. Additionally, no new
information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known at the time
the Approved Project FEIR was certified is available that would impact the prior finding of no significant
impact under this issue area.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 111 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Threshold (d) Result in inadequate emergency access?
No New or More Severe Impact: Proposed Project features to ensure sufficient emergency access include
access via two 40-foot-wide driveways, metal access gates with fire department padlocks, and 30 feet
between truck and trailer parking aisles to allow for fire/emergency response vehicles to maneuver
throughout the Proposed Project site.
The Approved Project FEIR stipulates that the Traffic Management Plan would be created via the City’s
requirements for any projects that include construction activities within the public right-of-way. The
Proposed Project would therefore be required to create a Traffic Management Plan which would include
practices such as directional signage, flagmen, and emergency access creation. Further, the Municipal
Code Section 30-529(A) requires developments to incorporate access for emergency vehicles to project
designs. The two driveways along Valley Boulevard would be of sufficient size to allow emergency vehicles
to traverse onto the Proposed Project site. By complying with the City’s Traffic Management Plan and
other traffic management regulations, the Proposed Project would maintain adequate emergency access
and result in a less than significant impact.
Mitigation Program
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
None identified in the Approved Project FEIR.
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no or more severe new impact as it pertains to emergency access.
No new impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified significant impact
evaluated in the Approved Project FEIR would occur. Additionally, no new information of substantial
importance that was not known and could not have been known at the time the Approved Project FEIR
was certified is available that would impact the prior finding of no significant impact under this issue area.
Overall Transportation Impact Conclusion
With regard to CEQA Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), the changes proposed by the
Proposed Project would not result in any new or more severe impacts from the previously identified
impacts, with respect to transportation. Therefore, preparation of a SEIR is not warranted.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 112 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
4.17 Utilities and Service Systems
4.17.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The Approved Project FEIR concluded that implementation of the SWIP Specific Plan Update would not
result in significant impacts relative to utilities and service systems. However, the implementation of the
below referenced Mitigation Measures was recommended.
4.17.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Require or result in the construction of new water, wastewater treatment facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental effects?
No New or More Severe Impact: The Proposed Project is a permitted use, allowed by right in the SWIP’s
SID. As such, the proposed use has been previously accounted for in the Approved Project FEIR, including
the potential water and wastewater required for the site. Domestic water services would be provided to
the Project by the Fontana Water Company (FWC). Wastewater treatment services are provided to the
area by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA). As discussed previously, the Project would utilize the
existing onsite water lines that connect to the existing 12-inch diameter water line in Valley Boulevard,
and the existing onsite sewer system would connect to the existing sewer line in Valley Boulevard.
Therefore, the Project would not result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water or
wastewater treatment facilities.
Additionally, the Approved Project FEIR determined that impacts to storm water drainage facilities would
be less than significant. The Proposed Project would not create or contribute runoff water that would
exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide additional sources of
polluted runoff.
Furthermore, as previously addressed, the Proposed Project will be required to prepare a SWPPP that
details construction and post-construction measures to control surface runoff in a manner that is
consistent with master planning efforts. Therefore, associated impacts are considered less than
significant. Accordingly, no new or more severe impact from a previously identified significant impact
evaluated in the Approved Project FEIR would occur.
Mitigation Program
The FEIR includes measures to reduce potential impacts associated the implementation of the Approved
Project. The following measures from the FEIR are applicable to the Proposed Project:
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
The mitigation measures listed below are included in the Approved Project FEIR; however, these are
goals/policies to be implemented by the City, and are not applicable to the Proposed Project.
4.8-8a The City shall maintain its current Master Plan of Sewers as the basis for development of
a sewer system to serve the community.
4.8-8b The City shall design and operate its local and trunk sewer system in close collaboration
with the Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA).
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 113 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
4.8-8c The City shall establish and maintain an aggressive water recycling program.
4.8-8d The City shall devote sufficient financial support for wastewater system maintenance so
that current levels of service, health, and safety are sustained or improved.
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impact as it pertains to placement of utilities
and sewer systems. Additionally, no new information of substantial importance that was not known and
could not have been known at the time the Approved Project FEIR was certified is available that would
impact the prior finding of no significant impact.
Threshold (b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project?
No New or More Severe Impact: The Approved Project FEIR determined that implementation of the SWIP
Specific Plan Update would have a less than significant impact with respect to water supplies. No potable
groundwater wells are proposed as part of the Proposed Project. The Proposed Project would be served
with potable water by the FWC. The FWC prepared a WSA for the SWIP Specific Plan Update as part of the
Approved Project FEIR process. Based on the results of the WSA, existing and future water entitlements
from groundwater, surface, and imported sources in addition to recycling and conservation were
determined to be sufficient to meet the Approved Project’s demand at buildout, in addition to forecast
demand for the FWC’s entire service area.19 Development of the Proposed Project site, which is located
in the SID, was calculated in the WSA, and the Proposed Project is consistent with the type of development
and square footage maximum anticipated for the site in the SID. Lastly, according to the FWC’s latest
2020 UWMP, the FWC has sufficient water supply through year 2045.20
The Proposed Project would consume water at a rate of approximately 1.6 acre-foot per year, based on
FWC water consumption rates (0.33 acre-foot, per acre, per year for industrial use21). The Proposed
Project would thus consume the same amount of water per year compared to the Approved Project.
Domestic water supplies from this service provider are reliant on groundwater from the Chino
Groundwater Basin, Rialto-Colton Basin, and No Man’s Land Basin. The FWC also relies on surface water
sourced from Lytle Creek and imported surface water from IEUA and San Bernardino Valley Municipal
Water District. All municipal water entities that exceed their safe yield incur a groundwater replenishment
obligation, which is used to recharge the groundwater basin. Thus, the Proposed Project’s demand for
domestic water service would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially
with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the
local groundwater table level.
Additionally, according to the 2020 UWMP, FWC is projected to have sufficient water supplies available
to serve its service area during normal, dry, and multiple dry years through 2045. Therefore, the Project
would have sufficient water supplies during the foreseeable future development during normal, dry and
multiple dry years.
19 City of Fontana. 2009. Water Supply Assessment for the Southwest Industrial Park Project.
20 San Gabriel Valley Water Company FWC Division. June 2021. 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. https://www.fontanawater.com/wp-
content/uploads/2021/10/FWC-2020-UWMP-June-2021-Final.pdf (accessed November 11, 2022).
21 Inland Empire Utilities Agency. 2016. 2015 Urban Water Management Plan. https://18x37n2ovtbb3434n48jhbs1-wpengine.netdna-
ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/FINAL-IEUA-WFA-2015-UWMP-2016-07-07.pdf (accessed June 18, 2022).
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 114 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Accordingly, no new or more severe impact relative to water supply from a previously identified significant
impact evaluated in the Approved Project FEIR would occur. Additionally, no new information of
substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known at the time the Approved
Project FEIR was certified is available that would impact the prior finding of no significant impact related
to the provision of water.
Mitigation Program
The FEIR includes measures to reduce potential impacts associated the implementation of the Approved
Project. The following measures from the Approved Project FEIR are applicable to the Proposed Project:
Mitigation Measures from the FEIR
The mitigation measures listed below are goals/policies to be implemented by the City and are not
applicable to the Proposed Project.
4.8-7a The City shall work closely with water supply agencies to assure the continued supply of
water.
4.8-7b The City shall act to conserve water in whatever cost-effective ways are reasonably
available.
4.8-7c The City shall manage urban runoff to minimize water supply contamination.
4.8-7d The City shall collaborate with water management authorities to devise and implement
creative and cost-effective water management strategies.
4.8-7e The City shall provide educational material to its residents and businesses regarding the
critical necessity for careful use of water and management of water systems.
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impact as it pertains to water supplies.
Additionally, no new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been
known at the time the Approved Project FEIR was certified is available that would impact the prior finding
of no significant impact to utilities and service systems.
Threshold (c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may
serve the project that it has inadequate capacity to serve the project’s projected
demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
No New or More Severe Impact: See discussion for Threshold 4.17.2(a) above. The SWIP Specific Plan
Update area is within the sewer service area of the City and the Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA). The
City is a member agency of the IEUA, which provides the City contracting privileges with the IEUA for off-
site collection, treatment, disposal and reuse.
A Water and Sewer Infrastructure Study (Study) was conducted for the SWIP Specific Plan Update in 2009.
The Study calculated existing sewer flow for the SID at 23,255 gallons per day (gpd) and 169,756 gpd for
ultimate buildout. Existing peak flow is 32 gallons per minute (gpm) and ultimate buildout is 236 gpm. The
Study found that existing sewerage collection capacity would be sufficient for ultimate Approved Project
land uses of the areas currently within the City limits, which includes the SID. However, the Study
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 115 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
recommended that because much of the SWIP Specific Plan Update area is under-utilized, estimated flows
for each trunk sewer system should be revised as these activities occur, in order to optimize sewer sizing.
In addition, potential trunk system alignment modifications may be in order to efficiently serve new parcel
construction.
The Proposed Project would produce 50.6 gpd of wastewater based on the wastewater generation factor
of 10.76 gallons per acre per day provided in the City’s General Plan.25 Thus the Proposed Project would
generate the same amount of wastewater per year compared to the Approved Project. As such, no change
would occur and no significant impacts are anticipated with respect to providing adequate wastewater
facilities to serve the Proposed Project.
Mitigation Program
Mitigation Measures 4.8-8a through 4.8-8d are listed in the Approved Project FEIR; however, these are
goals/policies to be implemented by the City, not the Proposed Project.
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impact as it pertains to wastewater
treatment capacity. Additionally, no new information of substantial importance that was not known and
could not have been known at the time the Approved Project FEIR was certified is available that would
impact the prior finding of no significant impact to wastewater treatment systems.
Threshold (d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity
of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction
goals?
Threshold (e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
No New or More Severe Impact: The Approved Project FEIR determined that the SWIP Specific Plan
Update would not result in significant impacts relative to solid waste with the implementation of
mitigation measures. Implementation of the Proposed Project would be expected to generate additional
waste during the temporary, short-term construction phase, as well as the long-term operational phase.
Solid waste service for the City is provided by the Mid-Valley Sanitary Landfill located east of the City.
According to CalRecycle, the landfill has a maximum throughput of 7,500 tons per day. Mid-Valley Sanitary
Landfill has a maximum permitted capacity of approximately 101.3 million cubic yards and a remaining
capacity of approximately 61 million cubic yards. The landfill has an expected operational life through
204522. The Fontana General Plan EIR notes that while the 2011 projected capacity of the landfill was
thought to be met by 2033, more recent projections indicate the same landfill may have capacity to accept
waste for another 30 to 40 years.23 The CalEEMod solid waste generation rate for general light industrial
land use is 1.24 tons per year per 1,000 square feet. Thus, the Proposed 96,002 SF warehouse would
generate approximately 119 tons of solid waste per year compared to the estimated 203 tons of solid
22 CalRecycle. 2022. Mid-Valley Sanitary Landfill. https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/SiteActivity/Details/1880?siteID=2662 (accessed
November 11, 2022).
23 City of Fontana. 2018. Fontana Forward General Plan Update 2015-2035 Draft Environmental Impact Report.
https://www.fontana.org/DocumentCenter/View/29524/Draft-Environmental-Impact-Report-for-the-General-Plan-Update (accessed
November 11, 2022).
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 116 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
waste per day generated by the 163,786 SF Approved Project. As such, the Proposed Project would
generate 84 fewer tons of solid waste than the Approved Project. For these reasons, the Proposed
Project’s solid waste disposal needs can be met by the Mid-Valley Sanitary Landfill and would not result
in a new impact. Additionally, the Proposed Project, as with all other development in the City, would be
required to adhere to City ordinances with respect to waste reduction and recycling. As a result, no
impacts related to State and local statutes governing solid waste are anticipated and no mitigation is
required. Consistent with the Approved Project FEIR, with implementation of the below-referenced
mitigation measures, the Proposed Project would have a less than significant impact.
Mitigation Program
The FEIR includes measures to reduce potential impacts associated with the implementation of the
Approved Project. The following measures from the Approved Project FEIR are applicable to the Proposed
Project:
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
The below mitigation measures are listed in the Approved Project FEIR; however, these are goals/policies
to be implemented by the City, not the Proposed Project.
4.8-9a The City shall continue to maintain a contractual arrangement that achieves maximum
recycling rates at a reasonable price.
4.8-9b Where joint programs offer improvement efficiency or reduced cost, the City shall
collaborate with other entities in recycling efforts.
4.8-9c The City shall continue to provide services to resident and business citizens that facilitate
community cleanup, curbside collections and diversion of oil and other hazardous waste
materials.
4.8-9d The City should maintain an aggressive public information program to stimulate waste
reduction by its resident and business citizens.
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would result in no new or more severe impact as it pertains to conflict with solid
waste standards and regulations. Additionally, no new information of substantial importance that was not
known and could not have been known at the time the Approved Project FEIR was certified is available
that would impact the prior finding of no significant impact to solid waste generation.
Overall Utility and Service Systems Impact Conclusion
With regard to CEQA Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), the changes proposed by the
Proposed Project would not result in any new or more severe impacts from the previously identified
impacts with respect to utilities and service systems. Therefore, preparation of a SEIR is not warranted.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 117 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
4.18 Wildfire
4.18.1 Analysis of Proposed Project
The revised CEQA Guidelines include a new separate discussion for Wildfire hazards. Although not
addressed as a separate threshold, the Approved Project FEIR noted in the Air Quality and Climate Change
chapter that climate change could result in increased occurrences and duration of wildfire events.
However, the SWIP Specific Plan Update area is located within an urbanized area and is surrounded by
development on all sides; it is not located adjacent to wildlands that may increase the risk of wildland
fires. Because the SWIP Specific Plan Update area is not considered susceptible to wildland fires, wildfire
risks as a result of global climate change is anticipated to be less than significant in the Approved Project
FEIR.
If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones,
would the project:
Threshold (a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
Threshold (b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby
expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the
uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
Threshold (c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate
fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
Threshold (d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream
flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage
changes?
No New or More Severe Impact: According to the CAL FIRE Fire Hazard Severity Zone map, the Project
site is not within an area identified as State Responsibility Area (SRA) or a Fire Hazard Area that may
contain substantial fire risk or a VHFHSZ (CAL FIRE 2022). Consistent with the Approved Project FEIR, the
Proposed Project site is located in a flat/leveled area which does not include wild habitat and is not located
near hillsides. The Proposed Project site is surrounded by a fully developed commercial and industrial
areas in all directions. Because the Proposed Project site would not be exposed to wildfires, wind, slope,
or other factors would not exacerbate wildfire risks. Additionally, the Proposed Project site would not
require the installation of additional roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, or other features that
could result in fire risks. Finally, the Proposed Project site is not exposed to flooding, landslides, runoff
conditions. No impact is anticipated to occur from Proposed Project implementation.
Mitigation Program
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
Not evaluated in the Approved Project FEIR; therefore, there are no mitigation measures from the
Approved Project FEIR.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 118 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Conclusion
Consistent with the Approved Project FEIR, the Proposed Project is not located near hillsides. No new
impact from wildfires would occur.
Overall Wildfire Impact Conclusion
With regard to CEQA Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), the changes proposed by the
Proposed Project would not result in any new or more severe impacts with respect to Wildfire. Therefore,
preparation of a SEIR is not warranted.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 119 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
4.19 Energy
4.19.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The revised CEQA Guidelines include a new separate discussion for Energy. Although not addressed as a
separate threshold in the Approved Project FEIR, the Approved Project FEIR analyzed energy conservation
as part of the Other CEQA Considerations and concluded that implementation of the SWIP Specific Plan
Update would result in a less than significant impact on energy resources. Additionally, the SWIP Specific
Plan had planned the Proposed Project site to be developed with light industrial uses. With this, the SWIP
Specific Plan Update planned and accounted for the use of energy from the permitted use.
4.19.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or
unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or
operation, and
No New or More Severe Impact.
Construction
Proposed Project construction would require energy for activities such as the manufacture and
transportation of building materials, grading activities, and building construction. Construction of the
Proposed Project would require electricity to power construction-related equipment, however, Project
construction would not involve the consumption of natural gas. Transportation energy represents the
largest energy use during construction and would occur from the transport and use of construction
equipment, delivery vehicles and haul trucks, and construction worker vehicles that would use petroleum
fuels (diesel fuel and/or gasoline). Table E-1 presents the Proposed Project’s energy consumption
estimates during construction.
Table E-1: Proposed Project Construction Energy Consumption Estimates
Energy Type Total Energy Consumption Percentage of Increase
Countywide
Diesel Fuel (total gallons) 43,585.4 0.01
Gasoline (total gallons) 13,605.5 <0.01
Source: Air Quality, Health Risk, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Report (Appendix B)
As shown in Table E-1, the Project would consume approximately 43,585.4 gallons of diesel fuel and
approximately 13,605.5 gallons of gasoline during construction. Based on fuel consumption obtained from
EMFAC2021, approximately 915.5 million gallons of gasoline and approximately 321.6 million gallons of
diesel will be consumed from vehicle trips in San Bernardino County in 2022. Therefore, construction of
the Proposed Project would increase the annual construction generated fuel use in San Bernardino County
by approximately 0.01 percent for diesel fuel usage and by less than 0.01 percent for gasoline fuel usage.
As such, Project construction would have a negligible effect on local and regional energy supplies. Further,
construction-related fuel use would be similar or less than with the Approved Project. No unusual project
characteristics would necessitate the use of construction equipment that would be less energy efficient
than at comparable construction sites in the region or the State. The Project would not cause or result in
the need for additional energy facilities or an additional or expanded delivery system. Therefore, fuel
consumption during construction would not be inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 120 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Operation
Operational energy use for the Proposed Project would be associated with natural gas use, electricity
consumption, and fuel used for vehicle trips. Energy consumption was estimated for the Proposed Project
using default energy intensities by land use type in CalEEMod while fuel use associated with vehicle and
truck trips generated by the Proposed Project was calculated using the Project's Trip Generation Analysis
(Appendix B). Table E-2 shows electricity, natural gas, and fuel usage estimates associated with the
Proposed Project.
Table E-2: Proposed Project Operational Energy Consumption
Energy Type Annual Energy
Consumption
Percentage of
Increase Countywide
Electricity Consumption (kWh/year) 228,600 <0.01
Natural Gas Consumption (therms/year) 1,930 <0.01
Automotive Fuel Consumption
Gasoline (gallons/year) 20,554.9 <0.01
Diesel Fuel (gallons/year) 22,881.3 <0.01
Source: Air Quality, Health Risk, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Report (Appendix B)
As shown in Table E-2, the estimated potential increase in electricity demand associated with the
operation of the Proposed Project is 228,600 kWh per year and the estimated potential increase in natural
gas is 1,930 therms per year. The Proposed Project is smaller in square footage than the Approved Project
and thus would result in a lower electricity and natural gas usage than the Approved SWIP buildout.
Additionally, total electricity consumption in San Bernardino County was 15,968.5 GWh (15,968,515,536
kWh), while total natural gas consumption was 527 million therms. Therefore, operation of the Proposed
Project would increase the electricity consumption in the County by less than 0.01 percent and increase
the annual natural gas consumption by less than 0.01 percent.
Electrical and natural gas demand associated with Project operations would not be considered inefficient,
wasteful, or unnecessary in comparison to other similar developments in the region. Additionally, the
Project would be required to adhere to all federal, State, and local requirements for energy efficiency,
including the Title 24 standards. Title 24 building energy efficiency standards establish minimum efficiency
standards related to various building features, including appliances, water and space heating and cooling
equipment, building insulation and roofing, and lighting, which would reduce energy usage.
As shown in Table E-2, fuel use associated with the vehicle trips generated by the Proposed Project is
estimated at 20,554.9 gallons of gasoline and 22,881.3 gallons of diesel fuel per year. This analysis
conservatively assumes that all vehicle trips generated as a result of Project operation would be new to
San Bernardino County. The Proposed Project is smaller in square footage than the Approved Project and
thus would result in a lower fuel usage than the Approved SWIP buildout. Additionally, based on fuel
consumption obtained from EMFAC2021, approximately 915.5 million gallons of gasoline and
approximately 321.6 million gallons of diesel will be consumed from vehicle trips in San Bernardino County
in 2022. Therefore, vehicle and truck trips associated with the Proposed Project would increase the annual
fuel use in San Bernardino County by approximately less than 0.01 percent for gasoline fuel usage and
approximately less than 0.01 percent for diesel fuel usage. Therefore, fuel consumption associated with
vehicle trips generated by Project operations would be consistent with current State and federal fuel
economy standards and would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 121 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Conclusion
The Proposed Project’s energy consumption for construction activities related to redevelopment of the
site for new industrial warehousing uses would be permitted to require compliance with existing fuel
standards, machinery efficiency standards, and CARB requirements that limit idling of trucks. Through
compliance with existing standards the Proposed Project would not result in demand for fuel greater on
a per-development basis than other development projects in Southern California. There are no unusual
Project characteristics that would cause the use of construction equipment that would be less energy
efficient compared with other similar construction sites in other parts of the State. Additionally, operation
of the Proposed Project would not result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy
resources. In addition, the Proposed Project would comply with current Title 24 requirements as well as
all applicable City business and energy codes and ordinances. Therefore, the Proposed Project would
result in a less than significant impact on energy consumption, and no new impacts would occur.
Mitigation Program
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
Not evaluated in the Approved Project FEIR; therefore, there are no mitigation measures from the
Approved Project FEIR.
Conclusion
No new impact from energy consumption would occur.
Threshold (b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency?
No New or More Severe Impact. The California Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency Standards are designed
to ensure new and existing buildings achieve energy efficiency and preserve outdoor and indoor
environmental quality. These measures (Title 24, Part 6) are listed in the California Code of Regulations.
The California Energy Commission is responsible for adopting, implementing and updating building energy
efficiency. Local city and county enforcement agencies have the authority to verify compliance with
applicable building codes, including energy efficiency. All development is required to comply with the
adopted California Energy Code (Code of Regulations, Title 24 Part 6), which is ensured through the City’s
development permitting process.
As previously stated, the Project would be consistent with Title 24 standards. Therefore, the Proposed
Project would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency,
and no new impacts would occur.
Conclusion
The Proposed Project would comply with current Title 24 requirements as well as all applicable City
business and energy codes and ordinances. Therefore, the Proposed Project would result in a less than
significant impact on energy consumption, and no new impacts would occur.
Mitigation Program
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
Not evaluated in the Approved Project FEIR; therefore, there are no mitigation measures from the
Approved Project FEIR.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 122 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Conclusion
No new impact from energy consumption would occur.
Overall Energy Impact Conclusion
With regard to CEQA Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), the changes proposed by the
Proposed Project would not result in any new or more severe impacts with respect to energy. Therefore,
preparation of a SEIR is not warranted.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 123 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
4.20 Tribal Cultural Resources
4.20.1 Analysis of Proposed Project
The revised CEQA Guidelines include a new separate discussion for Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs). This
section briefly examines potential impacts related to TCRs that could result from implementation of the
Proposed Project. The analysis is based primarily on confidential cultural resource studies conducted for
the Approved Project FEIR and the Proposed Project. PRC language relevant to the TCR thresholds is
below:
PRC Section 21074 defines a TRC as follows:
(a) “Tribal cultural resources” are either of the following:
(1) Sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a
California Native American tribe that are either of the following:
(A) Included or determined to be eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical
Resources.
(B) Included in a local register of historical resources as defined in subdivision (k) of Section
5020.1.
(2) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial
evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1. In
applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1 for the purposes of this
paragraph, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California
Native American tribe.
(b) A cultural landscape that meets the criteria of subdivision (a) is a tribal cultural resource to the
extent that the landscape is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the
landscape.
(c) A historical resource described in Section 21084.1, a unique archaeological resource as defined in
subdivision (g) of Section 21083.2, or a “nonunique archaeological resource” as defined in
subdivision (h) of Section 21083.2 may also be a tribal cultural resource if it conforms with the
criteria of subdivision (a).
Subdivision (k) of PRC Section 5020.1 is as follows:
(k) “Local register of historical resources” means a list of properties officially designated or
recognized as historically significant by a local government pursuant to a local ordinance or
resolution.
Subdivisions (a) and (c) of PRC Section 5024.1 are as follows:
(c) A resource may be listed as an historical resource in the California Register if it meets any of the
following National Register of Historic Places criteria:
(1) Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of
California’s history and cultural heritage.
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 124 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
(2) Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past.
(3) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction,
or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values.
(4) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.
Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource,
defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that
is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with
cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
Threshold (a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local
register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or
Threshold (b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial
evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of
Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of
the resource to a California Native American tribe?
In June 2022, a Cultural Resources Assessment was conducted, which included a cultural resources
records search, reconnaissance-level pedestrian cultural resources survey, and Sacred Lands File (SLF)
Search with the NAHC. The result of the SLF check conducted through the NAHC was negative. Following
coordination with the NAHC, they provided a list of tribes with traditional lands or cultural places within
the boundaries of the County. There are no CRHR- or NRHP-eligible tribal cultural resources located on
the Proposed Project site. Although no prehistoric sites have been locally recorded, in general the
Proposed Project site is situated at an ethnographic nexus peripherally occupied by the Gabrielino and
Serrano.
The Notice of Preparation for the Approved Project was filed in 2009; therefore, AB 52, which was enacted
in July 1, 2015, did not apply to the Approved Project FEIR. Likewise, the provisions of AB 52 are
inapplicable to this Addendum. The Proposed Project would be subject to comply with the Tribal Cultural
Resources standard conditions of approval listed below.
Based on the above, a less than significant impact would occur on TCRs from Proposed Project
implementation; however, if previously undocumented cultural resources are identified during
earthmoving activities, a qualified archaeologist shall be contacted to assess the nature and significance
of the find, diverting earthmoving activities if necessary, in accordance with Mitigation Measures 4.4-1b,
4.4-2b, and 4.4-2c.
Mitigation Program
Mitigation Measures from the Approved Project FEIR
Mitigation Measures 4.4-1b, 4.4-2b, and 4.4-2c apply, as discussed above.
Standard Conditions of Approval
Environmental Impact Analysis
SWIP Specific Plan Update 125 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
The Proposed Project would be subject to comply with the City’s Cultural and Tribal Standard Conditions
of Approval as listed below.
• Upon discovery of any tribal cultural or archaeological resources, cease construction activities in
the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All tribal cultural and
archaeological and tribal monitor/consultant. If the resources are Native American in origin,
interested Tribes (as a result of correspondence with area Tribes) shall coordinate with the
landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe will request
preservation in place or recovery for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of
the project while evaluation takes place.
• Preservation in place shall be the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not
feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavation to
remove the resource along the subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. All Tribal Cultural
Resources shall be returned to the Tribe. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native
American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in
the materials, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the
archaeological material, they shall be offered to the Tribe or a local school or historical society in
the area for educational purposes.
• Archaeological and Native American monitoring and excavation during construction projects shall
be consistent with current professional standards. All feasible care to avoid any unnecessary
disturbance, physical modification, or separation of human remains and associated funerary
objects shall be taken. Principal personnel shall meet the Secretary of the Interior standards for
archaeology and have a minimum of 10 years’ experience as a principal investigator working with
Native American archaeological sites in southern California. The Qualified Archaeologists shall
ensure that all other personnel are appropriately trained and qualified.
Conclusion
No new impact related to TCRs would occur.
Overall Tribal Cultural Resources Impact Conclusion
With regard to CEQA Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), the changes proposed by the
Proposed Project would not result in any new or more severe impacts with respect to tribal cultural
resources. Therefore, preparation of a SEIR is not warranted.
Determination of Appropriate CEQA Documentation
SWIP Specific Plan Update 126 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
5 DETERMINATION OF APPROPRIATE CEQA DOCUMENTATION
The following discussion lists the appropriate subsections of Sections 15162 and 15164 of the CEQA
Guidelines and provides justification for the City to make a determination of the appropriate CEQA
document for the Proposed Project, based on the environmental analysis provided above.
CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 ‒ Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations
(a) When an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent
EIR shall be prepared for that Project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of
substantial evidence in light of the whole record, one or more of the following:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the Project which will require major revisions of the
previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental
effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.
The City proposes to implement the Proposed Project within the context of the SWIP Specific Plan Update,
as described in this Addendum. As discussed in the Environmental Impact Analysis section of this
Addendum, the Proposed Project is entirely consistent with the SWIP Specific Plan Update, and no new
or more severe significant environmental effects beyond what was evaluated in the Approved Project FEIR
would occur.
(2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is
undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due
to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the
severity of previously identified significant effects.
As documented herein, the circumstances associated with the location, type, setting, or operations of the
Proposed Project have not substantively changed from what was evaluated in the Approved Project FEIR;
and none of the Proposed Project elements would result in new or more severe significant environmental
effects than previously identified. No major revisions to the Approved Project FEIR are required.
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been
known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as
complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
(A) The project will have one or more significant environmental effects not discussed in the
previous EIR or negative declaration;
No new significant environmental effects beyond those addressed in the Approved Project FEIR were
identified.
(B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in
the previous EIR;
Significant effects previously examined would not be more severe than were disclosed in the Approved
Project FEIR as a result of the Proposed Project. Impacts associated with all environmental resource areas
would be the same as or less than disclosed in the Approved Project FEIR. Implementation of the Proposed
Determination of Appropriate CEQA Documentation
SWIP Specific Plan Update 127 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Project within the context of the SWIP Specific Plan Update would not substantially increase the severity
of previously identified impacts.
(C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be
feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but
the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or
Based on the discussion above, no mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible
are now feasible.
(D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed
in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the
environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or
alternative.
No other mitigation measures or feasible alternatives have been identified that would be considerably
different than those incorporated in the Approved Project FEIR.
(b) If changes to a project or its circumstances occur or new information becomes available after
adoption of a negative declaration, the lead agency shall prepare a subsequent EIR if required
under subsection (a). Otherwise, the lead agency shall determine whether to prepare a
subsequent negative declaration, an addendum, or no further documentation.
Subsequent to certification of the Approved Project FEIR in May 2012, additional technical analyses were
performed for the Proposed Project and are the subject of this Addendum. Based on the analysis in this
document, the Proposed Project would not result in any new significant environmental effects nor would
it increase the severity of significant effects previously identified in the Approved Project FEIR. None of
the conditions listed under subsection (a) would occur that would require preparation of a subsequent
EIR.
(c) Once a project has been approved, the lead agency’s role in project approval is completed, unless
further discretionary approval on that project is required. Information appearing after an approval
does not require reopening of that approval. If after the project is approved, any of the conditions
described in subsection (a) occurs, a subsequent EIR or negative declaration shall only be prepared
by the public agency which grants the next discretionary approval for the project, if any. In this
situation, no other Responsible Agency shall grant an approval for the project until the
subsequent EIR has been certified or subsequent negative declaration adopted.
None of the conditions listed in subsection (a) would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. No SEIR is
required.
CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 ‒ Addendum to an EIR or Negative Declaration
Determination of Appropriate CEQA Documentation
SWIP Specific Plan Update 128 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
(a) The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if
some changes or additions are necessary, but none of the conditions described in Section 15162
calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred.
As described above, none of the conditions described in the CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the
preparation of a SEIR have occurred.
(b) An addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor technical
changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling
for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred.
None of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a SEIR would occur as a result
of the Proposed Project. Therefore, an Addendum to the certified Approved Project FEIR is the appropriate
CEQA document for the Proposed Project.
(c) An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the
FEIR or adopted negative declaration.
This Addendum will be attached to the Approved Project FEIR and maintained in the administrative record
files at the City.
(d) The decision-making body shall consider the addendum with the FEIR or adopted negative
declaration prior to making a decision on the project.
The City will consider this Addendum with the Approved Project FEIR prior to making a decision on the
Proposed Project.
(e) A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162
should be included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency’s required findings on the Project,
or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence.
This document provides substantial evidence for City records to support the preparation of this
Addendum for the Proposed Project.
Conclusion
SWIP Specific Plan Update 129 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
6 CONCLUSION
This Addendum has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines
to document the finding that none of the conditions or circumstances that would require preparation of
a SEIR, pursuant to Section 15162 and Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, exist in connection with the
Proposed Project. No major revisions to the Approved Project FEIR prepared for the SWIP Specific Plan
Update are required as a result of the Proposed Project. No new significant environmental impacts have
been identified. Since the certification of the Approved Project FEIR, there has been no new information
showing that mitigation measures or alternatives once considered infeasible are now feasible or showing
that there are feasible new mitigation measures or alternatives substantially different from those
analyzed in the Approved Project FEIR that the City declined to adopt. Therefore, preparation of a SEIR is
not required and the appropriate CEQA document for the Proposed Project is this Addendum to the
Approved Project FEIR. This document will be maintained in the administrative record files at the City.
References
SWIP Specific Plan Update 130 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
7 REFERENCES
Caltrans. 2020. Scenic Highways. https://dot.ca.gov/programs/design/lap-landscape-architecture-and-
community-livability/lap-liv-i-scenic-highways (accessed November 18, 2022).
City of Fontana. 2009. Water Supply Assessment for the Southwest Industrial Park Project.
City of Fontana. 2011. Southwest Industrial Park Specific Plan Update and Annexation Environmental
Impact Report.
City of Fontana. 2012. SWIP Specific Plan Update and Annexation FPEIR Mitigation and Monitoring
Program (Available in Appendix A).
City of Fontana. 2018. Fontana Forward General Plan Update 2015-2035.
https://www.fontana.org/2632/General-Plan-Update-2015---2035 (accessed November 15,
2022).
California Department of Conservation. 2022. California Important Farmland Finder.
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/ (accessed November 18, 2022).
Brian F. Smith and Associates, 2022. Cultural Resources Assessment (Available in Appendix D).
Brian F. Smith and Associates, 2022. Paleontological Resources Assessment (Available in Appendix F).
EPD Solutions, Inc., 2022. Trip Generation Analysis. (Available in Appendix J).
EPD Solutions, Inc., 2022. VMT Screening Memorandum. (Available in Appendix K).
Hillman Consulting, 2022. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. (Available in Appendix G).
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., 2022. Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan. (Available in
Appendix H).
LGC Geotechnical, Inc., 2022. Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation (Available in Appendix E).
LSA, 2022. Air Quality, Health Risk, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Report. (Available in Appendix
B).
LSA, 2022. Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis (Available in Appendix I).
State of California Department of Finance. 2022. E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities,
Counties, and the State, January 2021-2022, with 2020 Benchmark. Available at
http://www.dof.ca.gov/Forecasting/Demographics/Estimates/E-5/ (accessed November 18,
2022).
References
SWIP Specific Plan Update 131 14387 Valley Boulevard Industrial Project
Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
This page intentionally left blank.
APPENDIX A
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
APPENDIX B
AIR QUALITY, HEALTH RISK, GREENHOUSE GAS, AND ENERGY IMPACT REPORT
APPENDIX C
CALEEMOD EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR SWIP BUILDOUT
APPENDIX D
CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT
APPENDIX E
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
APPENDIX F
PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT
APPENDIX G
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
APPENDIX H
PRELIMINARY WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN
APPENDIX I
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
APPENDIX J
TRIP GENERATION MEMORANDUM
APPENDIX K
VMT SCREENING ANALYSIS