Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAppendix C2 - Storm Water Quality Management Plan Thienes Engineering, Inc. CIVIL ENGINEERING  LAND SURVEYING Storm Water Quality Management Plan (SWQMP) For: West Valley Logistics Center Locust Avenue and Armstrong Road Fontana, CA 92337 APNs: 0194-401-04, 05, 09 / 0256-131-05, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 / 0256-141-36 Prepared for: IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 840 Apollo Street, Suite 343 El Segundo, CA 90245 Phone: (213) 330-8066 Contact: Stephen Hollis Prepared by: Thienes Engineering, Inc. 14349 Firestone Boulevard La Mirada, CA 90638 Phone: (714) 521-4811 Contact: Luis Prado (luisp@thieneseng.com) Job No. 2884k Preliminary Approval Date: Construction Approval Date: Final Approval Date: Preliminary Submittal: Revised June 27, 2022 for final planning submittal Construction Submittal: Final Submittal: WQMP21-000034 TPM No. 19156 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC Project Owner’s Certification This Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been prepared for IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC by Thienes Engineering, Inc. The WQMP is intended to comply with the requirements of the City of Fontana and the NPDES Areawide Stormwater Program requiring the preparation of a WQMP. The undersigned, while it owns the subject property, is responsible for the implementation of the provisions of this plan and will ensure that this plan is amended as appropriate to reflect up-to-date conditions on the site consistent with the San Bernardino County’s Municipal Storm Water Management Program and the intent of the NPDES Permit for San Bernardino County and the incorporated cities of San Bernardino County within the Santa Ana Region. Once the undersigned transfers its interest in the property, its successors in interest and the city/county shall be notified of the transfer. The new owner will be informed of its responsibility under this WQMP. A copy of the approved WQMP shall be available on the subject site in perpetuity. “I certify under a penalty of law that the provisions (implementation, operation, maintenance, and fund) of the WQMP have been accepted and that the plan will be transferred to future successors.” Project Data Permit/Application Number(s): WQMP21-000034 Grading Permit Number(s): TBD Tract/Parcel Map Number(s): TPM No. 19156 Building Permit Number(s): TBD CUP, SUP, and/or APN (Specify Lot Numbers if Portions of Tract): APN: 0194-401-04, 05, 09 / 0256-131-05, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 / 0256-141-36 Owner’s Signature Owner Name: IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC Name/Title Stephen Hollis / VP Construction, Western Region Company IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC Address 840 Apollo Street, Suite 343, El Segundo, CA 90245 Email steve.hollis@idilogistics.com Telephone # (213) 330-8066 Signature Date Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC Preparer’s Certification Project Data Permit/Application Number(s): WQMP21-000034 Grading Permit Number(s): TBD Tract/Parcel Map Number(s): TPM No. 19156 Building Permit Number(s): TBD CUP, SUP, and/or APN (Specify Lot Numbers if Portions of Tract): APN: 0194-401-04, 05, 09 / 0256-131-05, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 / 0256-141-36 “The selection, sizing and design of stormwater treatment and other stormwater quality and quantity control measures in this plan were prepared under my oversight and meet the requirements of Regional Water Quality Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036.” Engineer: Reinhard Stenzel PE Stamp Below Title Director of Engineering Company Thienes Engineering, Inc. Address 14349 Firestone Boulevard, La Mirada, CA 90638 Email reinhard@thieneseng.com Telephone # (714) 521-4811 Signature Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC i Contents Section 1 Discretionary Permit(s) .......................................................................................................... 1-1 Section 2 Project Description ................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Project Information .................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Property Ownership/Management............................................................................................ 2-2 2.3 Potential Stormwater Pollutants ............................................................................................... 2-2 2.4 Water Quality Credits ................................................................................................................ 2-3 Section 3 Site and Watershed Description ............................................................................................ 3-1 Section 4 Best Management Practices (BMP) ....................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Source Control BMP ................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.1 Pollution Prevention .......................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.2 Preventive LID Site Design Practices .................................................................................. 4-6 4.2 Project Performance Criteria ..................................................................................................... 4-7 4.3 Project Conformance Analysis ................................................................................................. 4-13 4.3.1 Site Design Hydrologic Source Control BMP .................................................................... 4-15 4.3.2 Infiltration BMPs .............................................................................................................. 4-17 4.3.3 Harvest and Use BMP....................................................................................................... 4-19 4.3.4 Biotreatment BMP ........................................................................................................... 4-20 4.3.5 Conformance Summary ................................................................................................... 4-24 4.3.6 Hydromodification Control BMP ...................................................................................... 4-25 4.4 Alternative Compliance Plan (if applicable) ............................................................................. 4-26 Section 5 Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP .............................. 5-1 Section 6 WQMP Attachments .............................................................................................................. 6-1 6.1 Site Plan and Drainage Plan ....................................................................................................... 6-1 6.2 Electronic Data Submittal .......................................................................................................... 6-1 6.3 Post Construction ....................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.4 Other Supporting Documentation ............................................................................................. 6-1 6.5 WQMP Certification ................................................................................................................... 6-2 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC ii Forms Form 1-1 Project Information .................................................................................................................... 1-1 Form 2.1-1 Description of Proposed Project ............................................................................................. 2-1 Form 2.2-1 Property Ownership/Management ......................................................................................... 2-2 Form 2.3-1 Pollutants of Concern .............................................................................................................. 2-2 Form 2.4-1 Water Quality Credits .............................................................................................................. 2-3 Form 3-1 Site Location and Hydrologic Features ....................................................................................... 3-1 Form 3-2 Existing Hydrologic Characteristics for Drainage Area (DA) ....................................................... 3-2 Form 3-3 Watershed Description ............................................................................................................... 3-3 Form 4.1-1 Non-Structural Source Control BMPs ...................................................................................... 4-2 Form 4.1-2 Structural Source Control BMPs .............................................................................................. 4-4 Form 4.1-3 Preventive LID Site Design Practices Checklist ........................................................................ 4-6 Form 4.2-1 LID BMP Performance Criteria for Design Capture Volume .................................................... 4-7 Form 4.2-2 Summary of HCOC Assessment ............................................................................................... 4-9 Form 4.2-3 HCOC Assessment for Runoff Volume ................................................................................... 4-10 Form 4.2-4 HCOC Assessment for Time of Concentration ....................................................................... 4-11 Form 4.2-5 HCOC Assessment for Peak Runoff ....................................................................................... 4-12 Form 4.3-1 Infiltration BMP Feasibility .................................................................................................... 4-14 Form 4.3-2 Site Design Hydrologic Source Control BMPs ........................................................................ 4-16 Form 4.3-3 Infiltration LID BMP (including underground BMPs) (DA 1) .................................................. 4-18 Form 4.3-4 Harvest and Use BMPs .......................................................................................................... 4-19 Form 4.3-5 Selection and Evaluation of Biotreatment BMP .................................................................... 4-20 Form 4.3-6 Volume Based Biotreatment – Bioretention and Planter Boxes with Underdrains .............. 4-21 Form 4.3-7 Volume Based Biotreatment – Constructed Wetlands and Extended Detention ................. 4-22 Form 4.3-8 Flow Based Biotreatment ...................................................................................................... 4-23 Form 4.3-9 Conformance Summary and Alternative Compliance Volume Estimate (DA 1) ................... 4-24 Form 4.3-10 Hydromodification Control BMPs ....................................................................................... 4-25 Form 5-1 BMP Inspection and Maintenance ............................................................................................. 5-1 Attachments Attachment A: Existing Condition Site Photos Attachment B: BMP Design Calculations & Supporting Documentation Attachment C: WQMP Site Map Attachment D: WQMP and Stormwater BMP Transfer, Access and Maintenance Agreement Attachment E: Educational Materials Attachment F: Infiltration Report Attachment G: Hydrologic Conditions of Concern (HCOC) Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 1-1 Section 1 Discretionary Permit(s) Form 1-1 Project Information Project Name West Valley Logistics Center Project Owner Contact Name: Stephen Hollis Mailing Address: 840 Apollo Street, Suite 343 El Segundo, CA 90245 E-mail Address: steve.hollis@idilogistics.com Telephone: (213) 330-8066 Permit/Application Number(s): WQMP21-000034 Tract/Parcel Map Number(s): TPM No. 19156 Additional Information/ Comments: n/a Description of Project: The project site encompasses approximately 473.00 acres, where 213.25 acres consists of onsite and offsite improvements and 259.75ed acres consist of natural hillside areas adjacent to the project site. Proposed offsite work will consist of improvements in Armstrong Road, Locust Avenue and Jurupa Avenue. Proposed improvements to the onsite includes the construction of six warehouse type buildings ranging in size from 101,724 to 1,232,697 square feet. Three of the buildings (Buildings 1, 2 & 4) will be located on the west side of Locust Avenue/Armstrong Road, two buildings (Buildings 3 & 5) on the east side of Armstrong Road and the last building (Building 6) located at the southeast corner of Jurupa Avenue and Locust Avenue. There will be two proposed basins (solely used for detention) located within the project area. There will be landscaping adjacent to the public streets with the remainder of the site to be paved for vehicle and truck parking. Natural hillside areas adjacent to the project will be captured by inlets and routed offsite. The entire development including the offsite improvements and the natural hillside areas will ultimately be conveyed to an infiltration basin located south of Building 6. Currently, the project site is undeveloped. All runoffs from onsite and tributary offsite areas surface drain easterly and southerly through the residential neighborhood east of Locust Avenue and south of 11th Street, then ultimately to Cedar Avenue. The proposed LID BMPs for water quality treatment will be one (1) infiltration basin and five (5) hydrodynamic separators for pretreatment. Areas not tributary to hydrodynamic separators will utilize drain inserts for pretreatment. As previously stated, the infiltration basin will be located south of Building 6. As shown in Worksheet H of Attachment B, the design infiltration rate for this site is 7.2 inches per hour which can drawdown up to 172.8 inches of stormwater within 24 hours. The ponding depth is 54 inches for the infiltration basin. With this justification, the project’s design capture volume is determined using the 1.582 regression constant for 24 hours. Approximately 2.20 acres of pervious areas located south of Building 6 (DA 2) will sheet flow offsite without being routed to the LID BMP. These pervious areas are considered self-treating. Provide summary of Conceptual WQMP conditions (if previously submitted and approved). Attach complete copy. n/a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 2-1 Section 2 Project Description 2.1 Project Information This section of the WQMP should provide the information listed below. The information provided for Conceptual/Preliminary WQMP should give sufficient detail to identify the major proposed site design and LID BMPs and other anticipated water quality features that impact site planning. Final Project WQMP must specifically identify all BMP incorporated into the final site design and provide other detailed information as described herein. The purpose of this information is to help determine the applicable development category, pollutants of concern, watershed description, and long term maintenance responsibilities for the project, and any applicable water quality credits. This information will be used in conjunction with the information in Section 3, Site Description, to establish the performance criteria and to select the LID BMP or other BMP for the project or other alternative programs that the project will participate in, which are described in Section 4. Form 2.1-1 Description of Proposed Project 1 Development Category (Select all that apply): Significant re-development involving the addition or replacement of 5,000 ft2 or more of impervious surface on an already developed site New development involving the creation of 10,000 ft2 or more of impervious surface collectively over entire site Automotive repair shops with standard industrial classification (SIC) codes 5013, 5014, 5541, 7532- 7534, 7536-7539 Restaurants (with SIC code 5812) where the land area of development is 5,000 ft2 or more Hillside developments of 5,000 ft2 or more which are located on areas with known erosive soil conditions or where the natural slope is 25 percent or more Developments of 2,500 ft2 of impervious surface or more adjacent to (within 200 ft) or discharging directly into environmentally sensitive areas or waterbodies listed on the CWA Section 303(d) list of impaired waters. Parking lots of 5,000 ft2 or more exposed to storm water Retail gasoline outlets that are either 5,000 ft2 or more, or have a projected average daily traffic of 100 or more vehicles per day Non-Priority / Non-Category Project May require source control LID BMPs and other LIP requirements. Please consult with local jurisdiction on specific requirements. 2 Project Area (ft2): 20,603,880* (473.00 acres) 3 Number of Dwelling Units: n/a 4 SIC Code: 4225 5 Is Project going to be phased? Yes No If yes, ensure that the WQMP evaluates each phase as a distinct DA, requiring LID BMPs to address runoff at time of completion. 6 Does Project include roads? Yes No If yes, ensure that applicable requirements for road projects are addressed (see Appendix A of TGD for WQMP) *Includes approximately 2.20 acres of landscaping sheet flowing offsite and 259.75 acres of natural hillside areas adjacent to the project site. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 2-2 2.2 Property Ownership/Management Describe the ownership/management of all portions of the project and site. State whether any infrastructure will transfer to public agencies (City, County, Caltrans, etc.) after project completion. State if a homeowners or property owners association will be formed and be responsible for the long-term maintenance of project stormwater facilities. Describe any lot-level stormwater features that will be the responsibility of individual property owners. Form 2.2-1 Property Ownership/Management Describe property ownership/management responsible for long-term maintenance of WQMP stormwater facilities: IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 840 Apollo Street, Suite 343 El Segundo, CA 90245 Phone: (213) 330-8066 Contact: Stephen Hollis A property owner’s association (POA) will be formed for long-term maintenance of onsite stormwater facilities. The owner will maintain onsite stormwater facilities as shown in Attachment D. 2.3 Potential Stormwater Pollutants Determine and describe expected stormwater pollutants of concern based on land uses and site activities (refer to Table 3-3 in the TGD for WQMP). Form 2.3-1 Pollutants of Concern Pollutant Circle One: E=Expected, N=Not Expected Listed for Receiving Water Additional Information and Comments Pathogens (Bacterial / Virus) E N X Including petroleum hydrocarbons. Bacterial indicators are routinely detected in pavement runoff. Phosphorous E N Nitrogen E N X Expected pollutant if landscaping exists on-site. Sediment E N Expected pollutant if landscaping exists on-site. Metals E N X Oil and Grease E N Trash / Debris E N Pesticides / Herbicides E N Organic Compounds E N Expected pollutant if landscaping exists on-site. Including petroleum hydrocarbons and solvents. Other: The expected POCs for the project site are Pathogens, Nitrogen, and Metals. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 2-3 2.4 Water Quality Credits A water quality credit program is applicable for certain types of development projects if it is not feasible to meet the requirements for on-site LID. Proponents for eligible projects, as described below, can apply for water quality credits that would reduce project obligations for selecting and sizing other treatment BMP or participating in other alternative compliance programs. Refer to Section 6.2 in the TGD for WQMP to determine if water quality credits are applicable for the project. Form 2.4-1 Water Quality Credits 1 Project Types that Qualify for Water Quality Credits: Select all that apply Redevelopment projects that reduce the overall impervious footprint of the project site. [Credit = % impervious reduced] Higher density development projects Vertical density [20%] 7 units/ acre [5%] Mixed use development, (combination of residential, commercial, industrial, office, institutional, or other land uses which incorporate design principles that demonstrate environmental benefits not realized through single use projects) [20%] Brownfield redevelopment (redevelop real property complicated by presence or potential of hazardous contaminants) [25%] Redevelopment projects in established historic district, historic preservation area, or similar significant core city center areas [10%] Transit-oriented developments (mixed use residential or commercial area designed to maximize access to public transportation) [20%] In-fill projects (conversion of empty lots & other underused spaces < 5 acres, substantially surrounded by urban land uses, into more beneficially used spaces, such as residential or commercial areas) [10%] Live-Work developments (variety of developments designed to support residential and vocational needs) [20%] 2 Total Credit %: n/a (Total all credit percentages up to a maximum allowable credit of 50 percent) Description of Water Quality Credit Eligibility (if applicable) n/a The proposed project will not utilize any water quality credits. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 3-1 Section 3 Site and Watershed Description Describe the project site conditions that will facilitate the selection of BMP through an analysis of the physical conditions and limitations of the site and its receiving waters. Identify distinct drainage areas (DA) that collect flow from a portion of the site and describe how runoff from each DA (and sub-watershed DMAs) is conveyed to the site outlet(s). Refer to Section 3.2 in the TGD for WQMP. Complete form 3.2 for each DA on the project site. Form 3-1 Site Location and Hydrologic Features Site coordinates Take GPS measurement at approximate center of site Latitude: 34.041216 Longitude: -117.41199 Thomas Bros Map page: Page 645 1 San Bernardino County climatic region: Valley Mountain Desert 2 Does the site have more than one drainage area (DA): Yes No If no, proceed to Form 3-2. If yes, then use this form to show a conceptual schematic describing DMAs and hydrologic feature connecting DMAs to the site outlet(s). An example is provided below that can be modified for proposed project or a drawing clearly showing DMA and flow routing may be attached. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Southwest Fontana Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 3-2 Form 3-2 Existing Hydrologic Characteristics for Drainage Area (DA) For each drainage area’s sub-watershed DMA, provide the following characteristics Hyd Nodes 100- 104 Hyd Nodes 110- 116 Hyd Nodes 120- 125 Hyd Node 130- 135 Hyd Nodes 140- 146 Hyd Nodes 150- 153 Hyd Nodes 300- 302 1 DMA drainage area (ft2) 1,115,136 (25.60 ac) 5,595,282 (128.45 ac) 3,743,982 (85.95 ac) 2,164,932 (49.70 ac) 5,793,480 (133.00 ac) 1,311,156 (30.10 ac) 879,912 (20.20 ac) 2 Existing site impervious area (ft2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Antecedent moisture condition For desert areas, use http://www.sbcounty.gov/dpw/floodcontrol/pdf/2 0100412_map.pdf AMC II AMC II AMC II AMC II AMC II AMC II AMC II 4 Hydrologic soil group Refer to Watershed Mapping Tool – http://sbcounty.permitrack.com/WAP HSG A HSG A HSG A HSG A HSG A HSG A HSG A 5 Longest flowpath length (ft) 3,165 5,040 3,256 4,665 4,252 1,864 900 6 Longest flowpath slope (ft/ft) 0.1283 0.1726 0.0826 0.1644 0.1980 0.0601 0.0144 7 Current land cover type(s) Select from Fig C-3 of Hydrology Manual Barren Barren Barren Barren Barren Barren Barren 8 Pre-developed pervious area condition: Based on the extent of wet season vegetated cover good >75%; Fair 50-75%; Poor <50% See Attachment A for photos of site to support rating Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Runoff from the natural hillside areas adjacent to the project site currently drains onsite under existing conditions. The values above include an additional 259.75 acres of tributary area. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 3-3 Form 3-3 Watershed Description Receiving Waters Refer to Watershed Mapping Tool - http://sbcounty.permitrack.com/WAP See ‘Drainage Facilities” link at this website Surface runoff west along 11th Street Surface runoff south along Linden Avenue Surface runoff west along Cedar Avenue SD runoff southeast along Rubidoux Boulevard SD runoff southeast along Market Street Santa Ana River, Reach 4 Santa Ana River, Reach 3 Prado Dam Santa Ana River, Reach 2 Santa Ana River, Reach 1 Pacific Ocean Applicable TMDLs Refer to Local Implementation Plan Surface runoff west along 11th Street Surface runoff south along Linden Avenue Surface runoff west along Cedar Avenue SD runoff southeast along Rubidoux Boulevard SD runoff southeast along Market Street Santa Ana River, Reach 4: None Santa Ana River, Reach 3: Pathogens, Nitrate Prado Dam: Pathogens Santa Ana River, Reach 2: None Santa Ana River, Reach 1: None Pacific Ocean: None 303(d) listed impairments Refer to Local Implementation Plan and Watershed Mapping Tool – http://sbcounty.permitrack.com/WAP and State Water Resources Control Board website – http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/santaana/water_iss ues/programs/tmdl/index.shtml Surface runoff west along 11th Street Surface runoff south along Linden Avenue Surface runoff west along Cedar Avenue SD runoff southeast along Rubidoux Boulevard SD runoff southeast along Market Street Santa Ana River, Reach 4: Indicator Bacteria Santa Ana River, Reach 3: Copper, Indicator Bacteria, Lead Prado Dam: pH Santa Ana River, Reach 2: None Santa Ana River, Reach 1: None Pacific Ocean: None Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESA) Refer to Watershed Mapping Tool – http://sbcounty.permitrack.com/WAP n/a Unlined Downstream Water Bodies Refer to Watershed Mapping Tool – http://sbcounty.permitrack.com/WAP Santa Ana River Hydrologic Conditions of Concern Yes Complete Hydrologic Conditions of Concern (HCOC) Assessment. Include Forms 4.2-2 through Form 4.2-5 and Hydromodification BMP Form 4.3-10 in submittal No (see Attachment G for applicability map) Watershed–based BMP included in a RWQCB approved WAP Yes Attach verification of regional BMP evaluation criteria in WAP · More Effective than On-site LID · Remaining Capacity for Project DCV · Upstream of any Water of the US · Operational at Project Completion · Long-Term Maintenance Plan No Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 4-1 Section 4 Best Management Practices (BMP) 4.1 Source Control BMP 4.1.1 Pollution Prevention Non-structural and structural source control BMP are required to be incorporated into all new development and significant redevelopment projects. Form 4.1-1 and 4.1-2 are used to describe specific source control BMPs used in the WQMP or to explain why a certain BMP is not applicable. Table 7-3 of the TGD for WQMP provides a list of applicable source control BMP for projects with specific types of potential pollutant sources or activities. The source control BMP in this table must be implemented for projects with these specific types of potential pollutant sources or activities. The preparers of this WQMP have reviewed the source control BMP requirements for new development and significant redevelopment projects. The preparers have also reviewed the specific BMP required for project as specified in Forms 4.1-1 and 4.1-2. All applicable non-structural and structural source control BMP shall be implemented in the project. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 4-2 Form 4.1-1 Non-Structural Source Control BMPs Identifier Name Check One Describe BMP Implementation OR, if not applicable, state reason Included Not Applicable N1 Education of Property Owners, Tenants and Occupants on Stormwater BMPs X Property owner will familiarize him/herself with the educational materials in Attachment “E” and the contents of the WQMP. N2 Activity Restrictions X No outdoor work areas, processing, storage or wash area. N3 Landscape Management BMPs X Irrigation must be consistent with the local agency’s Water Conservation Ordinance. Fertilizer and pesticide usage will be consistent with local agency’s Management Guidelines for Use of Fertilizers and Pesticides. N4 BMP Maintenance X BMP maintenance, implementation schedules, and responsible parties are included with each specific BMP narrative. N5 Title 22 CCR Compliance (How development will comply) X No hazardous wastes onsite. N6 Local Water Quality Ordinances X Local agency does not have additional water quality ordinances. N7 Spill Contingency Plan X Owner/tenant will have a spill contingency plan based on individual site needs. N8 Underground Storage Tank Compliance X No USTs onsite. N9 Hazardous Materials Disclosure Compliance X No hazardous materials onsite. N10 Uniform Fire Code Implementation X Owner will comply with Article 80 of the Uniform Fire Code enforced by the fire protection agency. N11 Litter/Debris Control Program X Contract with their landscape maintenance firm to provide this service during regularly schedule maintenance. N12 Employee Training X The owner will ensure that tenants are also familiar with onsite BMPs and necessary maintenance required of the tenants. Owner will check with City and County at least once a year to obtain new or updated educational materials and provide these materials to tenants. Employees shall be trained to clean up spills and participate in ongoing maintenance. The WQMP requires annual employee training and new hires within 2 months. N13 Housekeeping of Loading Docks X Keep all fluids indoors. Clean up spills immediately and keep spills from entering storm drain system. No direct discharges into the storm drain system. Area shall be inspected weekly for proper containment and practices with spills cleaned up immediately and disposed of properly. N14 Catch Basin Inspection Program X Monthly inspection by property owner’s designee. Vacuum basins when sediment or trash becomes 2-inches deep and dispose of properly. N15 Vacuum Sweeping of Private Streets and Parking Lots X All landscape maintenance contractors will be required to sweep up all landscape cuttings, mowings and fertilizer materials off paved areas weekly and dispose of properly. Parking areas and drive ways will be swept monthly by sweeping contractor. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 4-3 Form 4.1-1 Non-Structural Source Control BMPs Identifier Name Check One Describe BMP Implementation OR, if not applicable, state reason Included Not Applicable N16 Other Non-structural Measures for Public Agency Projects X Not a public agency project. N17 Comply with all other applicable NDPES permits X Will comply with Construction General Permit and Industrial General Permit (may apply for No Exposure Certification/NEC). Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 4-4 Form 4.1-2 Structural Source Control BMPs Identifier Name Check One Describe BMP Implementation OR, if not applicable, state reason Included Not Applicable S1 Provide storm drain system stenciling and signage (CASQA New Development BMP Handbook SD-13) X “No Dumping – Drains to River” stencils will be applied. Legibility of stencil will be maintained on a yearly basis. S2 Design and construct outdoor material storage areas to reduce pollution introduction (CASQA New Development BMP Handbook SD-34) X No outdoor material storage areas onsite. S3 Design and construct trash and waste storage areas to reduce pollution introduction (CASQA New Development BMP Handbook SD-32) X Paved with an impervious surface, designed not to allow run-on from adjoining areas, designed to divert drainage from adjoining roofs and pavements diverted around the area, screened or walled to prevent off-site transport of trash. Provide solid roof or awning to prevent direct contact with rainfall. S4 Use efficient irrigation systems & landscape design, water conservation, smart controllers, and source control (Statewide Model Landscape Ordinance; CASQA New Development BMP Handbook SD-12) X Irrigation systems shall include reducers or shutoff valves triggered by a pressure drop to control water loss in the event of broken sprinkler heads or lines. Timers will be used to avoid over watering and watering cycles and duration shall be adjusted seasonally by the landscape maintenance contractor. The landscaping areas will be grouped with plants that have similar water requirements. Native or drought tolerant species shall also be used where appropriate to reduce excess irrigation runoff and promote surface filtration. S5 Finish grade of landscaped areas at a minimum of 1-2 inches below top of curb, sidewalk, or pavement X Landscaped areas will be depressed in order to increase retention of stormwater/irrigation water and promote infiltration. S6 Protect slopes and channels and provide energy dissipation (CASQA New Development BMP Handbook SD-10) X Runoff will be conveyed safely from tops of slopes using drainage terraces. Disturbed slopes will be stabilized with drought tolerant vegetation. No channels onsite. S7 Covered dock areas (CASQA New Development BMP Handbook SD-31) X Finished goods being loaded and unloaded at the docks do not have the potential to contribute to stormwater pollution. No direct connections will be made to a MS4. S8 Covered maintenance bays with spill containment plans (CASQA New Development BMP Handbook SD-31) X No maintenance bays onsite. S9 Vehicle wash areas with spill containment plans (CASQA New Development BMP Handbook SD-33) X No vehicle wash areas onsite. S10 Covered outdoor processing areas (CASQA New Development BMP Handbook SD-36) X No outdoor processing areas onsite. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 4-5 Form 4.1-2 Structural Source Control BMPs Identifier Name Check One Describe BMP Implementation OR, if not applicable, state reason Included Not Applicable S11 Equipment wash areas with spill containment plans (CASQA New Development BMP Handbook SD-33) X No equipment wash areas onsite. S12 Fueling areas (CASQA New Development BMP Handbook SD-30) X No fueling areas onsite. S13 Hillside landscaping (CASQA New Development BMP Handbook SD-10) X No hillsides onsite. S14 Wash water control for food preparation areas X No food preparation onsite. S15 Community car wash racks (CASQA New Development BMP Handbook SD-33) X No community cars wash racks onsite. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 4-6 4.1.2 Preventive LID Site Design Practices Site design practices associated with new LID requirements in the MS4 Permit should be considered in the earliest phases of a project. Preventative site design practices can result in smaller DCV for LID BMP and hydromodification control BMP by reducing runoff generation. Describe site design and drainage plan including: · A narrative of site design practices utilized or rationale for not using practices · A narrative of how site plan incorporates preventive site design practices · Include an attached Site Plan layout which shows how preventative site design practices are included in WQMP Refer to Section 5.2 of the TGD for WQMP for more details. Form 4.1-3 Preventive LID Site Design Practices Checklist Site Design Practices If yes, explain how preventative site design practice is addressed in project site plan. If no, other LID BMPs must be selected to meet targets. Minimize impervious areas: Yes No The project will utilize an infiltration basin to collect runoff from impervious areas. Maximize natural infiltration capacity: Yes No The infiltration basin will maximize natural infiltration. Preserve existing drainage patterns and time of concentration: Yes No Post-development drainage patterns will mimic pre-development conditions. Stormwater will be retained in the infiltrating basin to assist in maintaining the time of concentration compared to existing condition. Disconnect impervious areas: Yes No The infiltration basin will disconnect impervious areas before discharging offsite. Protect existing vegetation and sensitive areas: Yes No Not applicable, there are no sensitive areas to protect. Re-vegetate disturbed areas: Yes No Not applicable, development consists of a light industrial facility. Most of the disturbed areas will be paved; however, all disturbed areas will be collected by the infiltration basin for treatment. Minimize unnecessary compaction in stormwater retention/infiltration basin/trench areas: Yes No Heavy construction vehicles will be prohibited from unnecessary soil compaction at LID BMPs locations. Utilize vegetated drainage swales in place of underground piping or imperviously lined swales: Yes No Underground piping and imperviously lined swales are located in traffic areas and could not be substituted with a vegetated swale. Stake off areas that will be used for landscaping to minimize compaction during construction : Yes No Landscaped areas will be staked to minimize unnecessary compaction during construction. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 4-7 4.2 Project Performance Criteria The purpose of this section of the Project WQMP is to establish targets for post development hydrology based on performance criteria specified in the MS4 Permit. These targets include runoff volume for water quality control (referred to as LID design capture volume), and runoff volume, time of concentration, and peak runoff for protection of any downstream waterbody segments with a HCOC. If the project has more than one outlet for stormwater runoff, then complete additional versions of these forms for each DA / outlet. Methods applied in the following forms include: · For LID BMP Design Capture Volume (DCV), the San Bernardino County Stormwater Program requires use of the P6 method (MS4 Permit Section XI.D.6a.ii) – Form 4.2-1 · For HCOC pre- and post-development hydrologic calculation, the San Bernardino County Stormwater Program requires the use of the Rational Method (San Bernardino County Hydrology Manual Section D). Forms 4.2-2 through Form 4.2-5 calculate hydrologic variables including runoff volume, time of concentration, and peak runoff from the project site pre- and post-development using the Hydrology Manual Rational Method approach. For projects greater than 640 acres (1.0 mi2), the Rational Method and these forms should not be used. For such projects, the Unit Hydrograph Method (San Bernardino County Hydrology Manual Section E) shall be applied for hydrologic calculations for HCOC performance criteria. Refer to Section 4 in the TGD for WQMP for detailed guidance and instructions. Form 4.2-1 LID BMP Performance Criteria for Design Capture Volume 1 Project area (ft2): 8,431,038 DA 1 DMA A (193.55 ac)* 2 Imperviousness after applying preventative site design practices (Imp%): 95% 3 Runoff Coefficient (Rc): 0.807 Rc = 0.858(Imp%)3 - 0.78(Imp%)2 + 0.774(Imp%) + 0.04 4 Determine 1-hour rainfall depth for a 2-year return period P2yr-1hr (in): 0.511 http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/sa/sca_pfds.html 5 Compute P6, Mean 6-hr Precipitation (inches): 0.757 P6 = Item 4 *C1, where C1 is a function of site climatic region specified in Form 3-1 Item 1 (Valley = 1.4807; Mountain = 1.909; Desert = 1.2371) 6 Drawdown Rate Use 48 hours as the default condition. Selection and use of the 24 hour drawdown time condition is subject to approval by the local jurisdiction. The necessary BMP footprint is a function of drawdown time. While shorter drawdown times reduce the performance criteria for LID BMP design capture volume, the depth of water that can be stored is also reduced. 24-hrs 48-hrs 7 Compute design capture volume, DCV (ft3): 678,666 DCV = 1/12 * [Item 1* Item 3 *Item 5 * C2], where C2 is a function of drawdown rate (24-hr = 1.582; 48-hr = 1.963) Compute separate DCV for each outlet from the project site per schematic drawn in Form 3-1 Item 2 1 Project area (ft2): 762,300 DA 1 DMA B (17.50 ac)* 2 Imperviousness after applying preventative site design practices (Imp%): 10% 3 Runoff Coefficient (Rc): 0.110 Rc = 0.858(Imp%)3 - 0.78(Imp%)2 + 0.774(Imp%) + 0.04 4 Determine 1-hour rainfall depth for a 2-year return period P2yr-1hr (in): 0.511 http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/sa/sca_pfds.html Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 4-8 Form 4.2-1 LID BMP Performance Criteria for Design Capture Volume 5 Compute P6, Mean 6-hr Precipitation (inches): 0.757 P6 = Item 4 *C1, where C1 is a function of site climatic region specified in Form 3-1 Item 1 (Valley = 1.4807; Mountain = 1.909; Desert = 1.2371) 6 Drawdown Rate Use 48 hours as the default condition. Selection and use of the 24 hour drawdown time condition is subject to approval by the local jurisdiction. The necessary BMP footprint is a function of drawdown time. While shorter drawdown times reduce the performance criteria for LID BMP design capture volume, the depth of water that can be stored is also reduced. 24-hrs 48-hrs 7 Compute design capture volume, DCV (ft3): 8,399 DCV = 1/12 * [Item 1* Item 3 *Item 5 * C2], where C2 is a function of drawdown rate (24-hr = 1.582; 48-hr = 1.963) Compute separate DCV for each outlet from the project site per schematic drawn in Form 3-1 Item 2 1 Project area (ft2): 11,314,710 DA 1 DMA C (259.75 ac)* 2 Imperviousness after applying preventative site design practices (Imp%): 10% 3 Runoff Coefficient (Rc): 0.110 Rc = 0.858(Imp%)3 - 0.78(Imp%)2 + 0.774(Imp%) + 0.04 4 Determine 1-hour rainfall depth for a 2-year return period P2yr-1hr (in): 0.511 http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/sa/sca_pfds.html 5 Compute P6, Mean 6-hr Precipitation (inches): 0.757 P6 = Item 4 *C1, where C1 is a function of site climatic region specified in Form 3-1 Item 1 (Valley = 1.4807; Mountain = 1.909; Desert = 1.2371) 6 Drawdown Rate Use 48 hours as the default condition. Selection and use of the 24 hour drawdown time condition is subject to approval by the local jurisdiction. The necessary BMP footprint is a function of drawdown time. While shorter drawdown times reduce the performance criteria for LID BMP design capture volume, the depth of water that can be stored is also reduced. 24-hrs 48-hrs 7 Compute design capture volume, DCV (ft3): 124,668 DCV = 1/12 * [Item 1* Item 3 *Item 5 * C2], where C2 is a function of drawdown rate (24-hr = 1.582; 48-hr = 1.963) Compute separate DCV for each outlet from the project site per schematic drawn in Form 3-1 Item 2 1 See Attachment B for detailed calculations. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 4-9 Form 4.2-2 Summary of HCOC Assessment Does project have the potential to cause or contribute to an HCOC in a downstream channel: Yes No Go to: http://sbcounty.permitrack.com/WAP/ If “Yes”, then complete HCOC assessment of site hydrology for 2yr storm event using Forms 4.2-3 through 4.2-5 and insert results below (Forms 4.2-3 through 4.2-5 may be replaced by computer software analysis based on the San Bernardino County Hydrology Manual) If “No,” then proceed to Section 4.3 Project Conformance Analysis Condition Runoff Volume (ft3) Time of Concentration (min) Peak Runoff (cfs) Pre-developed 1 n/a Form 4.2-3 Item 12 2 n/a Form 4.2-4 Item 13 3 n/a Form 4.2-5 Item 10 Post-developed 4 n/a Form 4.2-3 Item 13 5 n/a Form 4.2-4 Item 14 6 n/a Form 4.2-5 Item 14 Difference 7 n/a Item 4 – Item 1 8 n/a Item 5 – Item 2 9 n/a Item 6 – Item 3 Difference (as % of pre-developed) 10 n/a Item 7 / Item 1 11 n/a Item 8 / Item 2 12 n/a Item 9 / Item 3 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 4-10 Form 4.2-3 HCOC Assessment for Runoff Volume Compute weighted curve number for pre and post developed conditions Pre-developed DA Add more columns if more than 4 DMA Post-developed DA Add more columns if more than 4 DMA DMA A DMA B DMA C DMA D DMA A DMA B DMA C DMA D 1 Land Cover type 2 Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) 3 DMA Area, ft2 sum of areas of DMA should equal area of DA 4 Curve Number (CN) Use Items 1 and 2 to select the appropriate CN from Appendix C-2 of the TGD for WQMP 5 Pre-Developed area-weighted CN: 6 Post-Developed area-weighted CN: 7 Pre-developed soil storage capacity, S (in): S = (1000 / Item 5) - 10 8 Post-developed soil storage capacity, S (in): S = (1000 / Item 6) - 10 9 Initial abstraction, Ia (in): Ia = 0.2 * Item 7 10 Initial abstraction, Ia (in): Ia = 0.2 * Item 8 11 Precipitation for 2 yr, 24 hr storm (in): Go to: http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/sa/sca_pfds.html 12 Pre-developed Volume (ft3): Vpre =(1 / 12) * (Item sum of Item 3) * [(Item 11 – Item 9)^2 / ((Item 11 – Item 9 + Item 7) 13 Post-developed Volume (ft3): Vpre =(1 / 12) * (Item sum of Item 3) * [(Item 11 – Item 10)^2 / ((Item 11 – Item 10 + Item 8) 14 Volume Reduction needed to meet HCOC Requirement, (ft3): VHCOC = (Item 13 * 0.95) – Item 12 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 4-11 Form 4.2-4 HCOC Assessment for Time of Concentration Compute time of concentration for pre and post developed conditions for each DA (For projects using the Hydrology Manual complete the form below) Variables Pre-developed DA Add more columns if more than 4 DMA Post-developed DA Add more columns if more than 4 DMA DMA A DMA B DMA C DMA D DMA A DMA B DMA C DMA D 1 Length of flowpath (ft) Use Form 3-2 Item 5 for pre-developed condition 2 Change in elevation (ft) 3 Slope (ft/ft), So = Item 2 / Item 1 4 Land cover 5 Initial DMA Time of Concentration (min) Appendix C-1 of the TGD for WQMP 6 Length of conveyance from DMA outlet to project site outlet (ft) May be zero if DMA outlet is at project site outlet 7 Cross-sectional area of channel (ft2) 8 Wetted perimeter of channel (ft) 9 Manning’s roughness of channel (n) 10 Channel flow velocity (ft/sec) Vfps = (1.49 /Item 9) * (Item 7/Item 8)0.67 * (Item 3)0.5 11 Travel time to outlet (min) Tt = Item 6 / (Item 10 * 60) 12 Total time of concentration (min) Tc = Item 5 + Item 11 13 Pre-developed time of concentration (min): Minimum of Item 12 pre-developed DMA 14 Post-developed time of concentration (min): Minimum of Item 12 post-developed DMA 15 Additional time of concentration needed to meet HCOC requirement (min): TC-HCOC = (Item 14 * 0.95) – Item 13 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 4-12 Form 4.2-5 HCOC Assessment for Peak Runoff Compute peak runoff for pre and post developed conditions Variables Pre-developed DA Add more columns if more than 3 DMA Post-developed DA Add more columns if more than 3 DMA DMA A DMA B DMA C DMA A DMA B DMA C 1 Rainfall Intensity for storm duration equal to time of concentration Ipeak = 10^(LOG Form 4.2-1 Item 4 - 0.6 LOG Form 4.2-4 Item 5 /60) 2 Drainage Area of each DMA (ft2) For DMA with outlet at project site outlet, include upstream DMA (Using example schematic in Form 3-1, DMA A will include drainage from DMA C) 3 Ratio of pervious area to total area For DMA with outlet at project site outlet, include upstream DMA (Using example schematic in Form 3-1, DMA A will include drainage from DMA C) 4 Pervious area infiltration rate (in/hr) Use pervious area CN and antecedent moisture condition with Appendix C-3 of the TGD for WQMP 5 Maximum loss rate (in/hr) Fm = Item 3 * Item 4 Use area-weighted Fm from DMA with outlet at project site outlet, include upstream DMA (Using example schematic in Form 3-1, DMA A will include drainage from DMA C) 6 Peak Flow from DMA (cfs) Qp =Item 2 * 0.9 * (Item 1 - Item 5) 7 Time of concentration adjustment factor for other DMA to site discharge point Form 4.2-4 Item 12 DMA / Other DMA upstream of site discharge point (If ratio is greater than 1.0, then use maximum value of 1.0) DMA A n/a n/a DMA B n/a n/a DMA C n/a n/a 8 Pre-developed Qp at Tc for DMA A: Qp = Item 6DMAA + [Item 6DMAB * (Item 1DMAA – Item 5DMAB) / (Item 1DMAB - Item 5DMAB) * Item 7DMAA/2] + [Item 6DMAC * (Item 1DMAA - Item 5DMAC) / (Item 1DMAC - Item 5DMAC) * Item 7DMAA/3] 9 Pre-developed Qp at Tc for DMA B: Qp = Item 6DMAB + [Item 6DMAA * (Item 1DMAB – Item 5DMAA) / (Item 1DMAA - Item 5DMAA) * Item 7DMAB/1] + [Item 6DMAC * (Item 1DMAB - Item 5DMAC) / (Item 1DMAC - Item 5DMAC) * Item 7DMAB/3] 10 Pre-developed Qp at Tc for DMA C: Qp = Item 6DMAC + [Item 6DMAA * (Item 1DMAC – Item 5DMAA) / (Item 1DMAA - Item 5DMAA) * Item 7DMAC/1] + [Item 6DMAB * (Item 1DMAC - Item 5DMAB) / (Item 1DMAB - Item 5DMAB) * Item 7DMAC/2] 11 Peak runoff from pre-developed condition confluence analysis (cfs): Maximum of Item 8, 9, and 10 12 Post-developed Qp at Tc for DMA A: Same as Item 8 for post-developed values 13 Post-developed Qp at Tc for DMA B: Same as Item 9 for post-developed values 14 Post-developed Qp at Tc for DMA C: Same as Item 10 for post-developed values 15 Peak runoff from post-developed condition confluence analysis (cfs): Maximum of Item 12, 13, and 14 16 Peak runoff reduction needed to meet HCOC Requirement (cfs): Qp-HCOC = (Item 14 * 0.95) – Item 11 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 4-13 4.3 Project Conformance Analysis Complete the following forms for each project site DA to document that the proposed LID BMPs conform to the project DCV developed to meet performance criteria specified in the MS4 Permit (WQMP Template Section 4.2). For the LID DCV, the forms are ordered according to hierarchy of BMP selection as required by the MS4 Permit (see Section 5.3.1 in the TGD for WQMP). The forms compute the following for on-site LID BMP: · Site Design and Hydrologic Source Controls (Form 4.3-2) · Retention and Infiltration (Form 4.3-3) · Harvested and Use (Form 4.3-4) or · Biotreatment (Form 4.3-5). At the end of each form, additional fields facilitate the determination of the extent of mitigation provided by the specific BMP category, allowing for use of the next category of BMP in the hierarchy, if necessary. The first step in the analysis, using Section 5.3.2.1 of the TGD for WQMP, is to complete Forms 4.3-1 and 4.3-3) to determine if retention and infiltration BMPs are infeasible for the project. For each feasibility criterion in Form 4.3-1, if the answer is “Yes,” provide all study findings that includes relevant calculations, maps, data sources, etc. used to make the determination of infeasibility. Next, complete Forms 4.3-2 and 4.3-4 to determine the feasibility of applicable HSC and harvest and use BMPs, and, if their implementation is feasible, the extent of mitigation of the DCV. If no site constraints exist that would limit the type of BMP to be implemented in a DA, evaluate the use of combinations of LID BMPs, including all applicable HSC BMPs to maximize on-site retention of the DCV. If no combination of BMP can mitigate the entire DCV, implement the single BMP type, or combination of BMP types, that maximizes on-site retention of the DCV within the minimum effective area. If the combination of LID HSC, retention and infiltration, and harvest and use BMPs are unable to mitigate the entire DCV, then biotreatment BMPs may be implemented by the project proponent. If biotreatment BMPs are used, then they must be sized to provide sufficient capacity for effective treatment of the remainder of the volume-based performance criteria that cannot be achieved with LID BMPs (TGD for WQMP Section 5.4.4.2). Under no circumstances shall any portion of the DCV be released from the site without effective mitigation and/or treatment. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 4-14 Form 4.3-1 Infiltration BMP Feasibility Feasibility Criterion – Complete evaluation for each DA on the Project Site 1 Would infiltration BMP pose significant risk for groundwater related concerns? Yes No Refer to Section 5.3.2.1 of the TGD for WQMP If Yes, Provide basis: (attach) 2 Would installation of infiltration BMP significantly increase the risk of geotechnical hazards? Yes No (Yes, if the answer to any of the following questions is yes, as established by a geotechnical expert): · The location is less than 50 feet away from slopes steeper than 15 percent · The location is less than eight feet from building foundations or an alternative setback. · A study certified by a geotechnical professional or an available watershed study determines that stormwater infiltration would result in significantly increased risks of geotechnical hazards. If Yes, Provide basis: (attach) 3 Would infiltration of runoff on a Project site violate downstream water rights? Yes No If Yes, Provide basis: (attach) 4 Is proposed infiltration facility located on hydrologic soil group (HSG) D soils or does the site geotechnical investigation indicate presence of soil characteristics, which support categorization as D soils? Yes No If Yes, Provide basis: (attach) 5 Is the design infiltration rate, after accounting for safety factor of 2.0, below proposed facility less than 0.3 in/hr (accounting for soil amendments)? Yes No If Yes, Provide basis: 6 Would on-site infiltration or reduction of runoff over pre-developed conditions be partially or fully inconsistent with watershed management strategies as defined in the WAP, or impair beneficial uses? Yes No See Section 3.5 of the TGD for WQMP and WAP If Yes, Provide basis: (attach) 7 Any answer from Item 1 through Item 3 is “Yes”: Yes No If yes, infiltration of any volume is not feasible onsite. Proceed to Form 4.3-4, Harvest and Use BMP. If no, then proceed to Item 9 below. 8 Any answer from Item 4 through Item 6 is “Yes”: Yes No If yes, infiltration is permissible but is not required to be considered. Proceed to Form 4.3-2, Hydrologic Source Control BMP. If no, then proceed to Item 9, below. 9 All answers to Item 1 through Item 6 are “No”: Yes No Infiltration of the full DCV is potentially feasible, LID infiltration BMP must be designed to infiltrate the full DCV to the MEP. Proceed to Form 4.3-2, Hydrologic Source Control BMP. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 4-15 4.3.1 Site Design Hydrologic Source Control BMP Section XI.E. of the Permit emphasizes the use of LID preventative measures; and the use of LID HSC BMPs reduces the portion of the DCV that must be addressed in downstream BMPs. Therefore, all applicable HSC shall be provided except where they are mutually exclusive with each other, or with other BMPs. Mutual exclusivity may result from overlapping BMP footprints such that either would be potentially feasible by itself, but both could not be implemented. Please note that while there are no numeric standards regarding the use of HSC, if a project cannot feasibly meet BMP sizing requirements or cannot fully address HCOCs, feasibility of all applicable HSC must be part of demonstrating that the BMP system has been designed to retain the maximum feasible portion of the DCV. Complete Form 4.3-2 to identify and calculate estimated retention volume from implementing site design HSC BMP. Refer to Section 5.4.1 in the TGD for more detailed guidance. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 4-16 Form 4.3-2 Site Design Hydrologic Source Control BMPs 1 Implementation of Impervious Area Dispersion BMP (i.e. routing runoff from impervious to pervious areas), excluding impervious areas planned for routing to on-lot infiltration BMP): Yes No If yes, complete Items 2-5; If no, proceed to Item 6 Variables Aggregate impervious area dispersion with equal ratios of pervious to impervious; BMP Type and DA BMP Type and DA BMP Type and DA 2 Total impervious area draining to pervious area 3 Ratio of pervious area receiving runoff to impervious area 4 Retention volume achieved from impervious area dispersion (ft3) V = Item2 * Item 3 * (0.5/12), assuming retention of 0.5 inches of runoff 5 Sum of retention volume achieved from impervious area dispersion (ft3): 0 Vretention = Sum of Item 4 for all BMPs 6 Implementation of Localized On-lot Infiltration BMPs (e.g. on-lot rain gardens): Yes No If yes, complete Items 7-13 for aggregate of all on-lot infiltration BMP in each DA; If no, proceed to Item 14 BMP Type and DA BMP Type and DA BMP Type and DA 7 Ponding surface area (ft2) 8 Ponding depth (ft) 9 Surface area of amended soil/gravel (ft2) 10 Average depth of amended soil/gravel (ft) 11 Average porosity of amended soil/gravel 12 Retention volume achieved from on-lot infiltration (ft3) Vretention = (Item 7 *Item 8) + (Item 9 * Item 10 * Item 11) 13 Runoff volume retention from on-lot infiltration (ft3): 0 Vretention = Sum of Item 12 for all BMPs 14 Implementation of evapotranspiration BMP (green, brown, or blue roofs): Yes No If yes, complete Items 15-20. If no, proceed to Item 21 BMP Type and DA BMP Type and DA BMP Type and DA 15 Rooftop area planned for ET BMP (ft2) 16 Average wet season ET demand (in/day) Use local values, typical ~ 0.1 17 Daily ET demand (ft3/day) Item 15 * (Item 16 / 12) 18 Drawdown time (hrs) Copy Item 6 in Form 4.2-1 19 Retention Volume (ft3) Vretention = Item 17 * (Item 18 / 24) 20 Runoff volume retention from evapotranspiration BMPs (ft3): 0 V = Sum of Item 19 for all BMPs 21 Implementation of Street Trees: Yes No If yes, complete Items 20-2. If no, proceed to Item 26 BMP Type and DA BMP Type and DA BMP Type and DA 22 Number of Street Trees 23 Average canopy cover over impervious area (ft2) 24 Runoff volume retention from street trees (ft3) Vretention = Item 22 * Item 23 * (0.05/12) assume runoff retention of 0.05 inches 25 Runoff volume retention from street tree BMPs (ft3): 0 Vretention = Sum of Item 24 for all BMPs 26 Implementation of residential rain barrels/cisterns: Yes No If yes, complete Items 27-28; If no, proceed to Item 30 BMP Type and DA BMP Type and DA BMP Type and DA 27 Number of rain barrels/cisterns 28 Runoff volume retention from rain barrels/cisterns (ft3) Vretention = Item 27 * 3 29 Runoff volume retention from residential rain barrels/Cisterns (ft3): 0 Vretention =Sum of Item 28 for all BMPs 30 Total Retention Volume from Site Design Hydrologic Source Control BMPs: 0 Sum of Items 5, 13, 20, 25 and 29 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 4-17 4.3.2 Infiltration BMPs Use Form 4.3-3 to compute on-site retention of runoff from proposed retention and infiltration BMPs. Volume retention estimates are sensitive to the percolation rate used, which determines the amount of runoff that can be infiltrated within the specified drawdown time. The infiltration safety factor reduces field measured percolation to account for potential inaccuracy associated with field measurements, declining BMP performance over time, and compaction during construction. Appendix D of the TGD for WQMP provides guidance on estimating an appropriate safety factor to use in Form 4.3-3. If site constraints limit the use of BMPs to a single type and implementation of retention and infiltration BMPs mitigate no more than 40% of the DCV, then they are considered infeasible and the Project Proponent may evaluate the effectiveness of BMPs lower in the LID hierarchy of use (Section 5.5.1 of the TGD for WQMP) If implementation of infiltrations BMPs is feasible as determined using Form 4.3-1, then LID infiltration BMPs shall be implemented to the MEP (section 4.1 of the TGD for WQMP). Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 4-18 Form 4.3-3 Infiltration LID BMP (including underground BMPs) (DA 1) 1 Remaining LID DCV not met by site design HSC BMP (ft3): 811,733 V = Form 4.2-1 Item 7 - Form 4.3-2 Item 30 BMP Type Use columns to the right to compute runoff volume retention from proposed infiltration BMP (select BMP from Table 5-4 in TGD for WQMP) DA 1 Infiltration Basin 2 Infiltration rate of underlying soils (in/hr) See Section 5.4.2 and Appendix D of the TGD for WQMP for minimum requirements for assessment methods 18.0 3 Infiltration safety factor See TGD Section 5.4.2 and Appendix D 2.5 4 Design percolation rate (in/hr) Pdesign = Item 2 / Item 3 7.2 5 Ponded water drawdown time (hr) Copy Item 6 in Form 4.2-1 24 6 Maximum ponding depth (ft) BMP specific, see Table 5-4 of the TGD for WQMP for BMP design details 4.50 (54 inches) 7 Ponding Depth (ft) dBMP = Minimum of (1/12 * Item 4 * Item 5) or Item 6 4.50 (54 inches) 8 Infiltrating surface area, SA (ft2) The lesser of the area needed for BMP infiltration of full DCV or minimum space requirements from Table 5-7 of the TGD for WQMP 197,095 9 Amended soil depth, dmedia (ft) Only included in certain BMP types, see Table 5-4 in the TGD for WQMP for reference to BMP design details n/a 10 Amended soil porosity n/a 11 Gravel depth, dmedia (ft) Only included in certain BMP types, see Table 5-4 of the TGD for WQMP for BMP design details n/a 12 Gravel porosity n/a 13 Duration of storm as basin is filling (hrs) Typical ~ 3hrs 3.0 14 Above Ground Retention Volume (ft3) Vretention = Item 8 * [Item7 + (Item 9 retention * Item 10) + (Item 11 * Item 12) + (Item 13 * (Item 4 / 12))] n/a 15 Underground Retention Volume (ft3) Volume determined using manufacturer’s specifications and calculations 886,928 (see Attach. B for basin volume calculations) 16 Total Retention Volume from LID Infiltration BMPs (ft3): 886,928 (Sum of Items 14 and 15 for all infiltration BMP included in plan) 17 Fraction of DCV achieved with infiltration BMP: 100% Retention% = Item 16 / Form 4.2-1 Item 7 18 Is full LID DCV retained on-site with combination of hydrologic source control and LID retention and infiltration BMPs? Yes No If yes, demonstrate conformance using Form 4.3-10; If no, then reduce Item 3, Factor of Safety to 2.0 and increase Item 8, Infiltrating Surface Area, such that the portion of the site area used for retention and infiltration BMPs equals or exceeds the minimum effective area thresholds (Table 5-7 of the TGD for WQMP) for the applicable category of development and repeat all above calculations. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 4-19 4.3.3 Harvest and Use BMP Harvest and use BMP may be considered if the full LID DCV cannot be met by maximizing infiltration BMPs. Use Form 4.3-4 to compute on-site retention of runoff from proposed harvest and use BMPs. Volume retention estimates for harvest and use BMPs are sensitive to the on-site demand for captured stormwater. Since irrigation water demand is low in the wet season, when most rainfall events occur in San Bernardino County, the volume of water that can be used within a specified drawdown period is relatively low. The bottom portion of Form 4.3-4 facilitates the necessary computations to show infeasibility if a minimum incremental benefit of 40 percent of the LID DCV would not be achievable with MEP implementation of on-site harvest and use of stormwater (Section 5.5.4 of the TGD for WQMP). Form 4.3-4 Harvest and Use BMPs 1 Remaining LID DCV not met by site design HSC or infiltration BMP (ft3): Vunmet = Form 4.2-1 Item 7 - Form 4.3-2 Item 30 – Form 4.3-3 Item 16 BMP Type(s) Compute runoff volume retention from proposed harvest and use BMP (Select BMPs from Table 5-4 of the TGD for WQMP) BMP Type and DA BMP Type and DA BMP Type and DA 2 Describe cistern or runoff detention facility 3 Storage volume for proposed detention type (ft3) Volume of cistern 4 Landscaped area planned for use of harvested stormwater (ft2) 5 Average wet season daily irrigation demand (in/day) Use local values, typical ~ 0.1 in/day 6 Daily water demand (ft3/day) Item 4 * (Item 5 / 12) 7 Drawdown time (hrs) Copy Item 6 from Form 4.2-1 8 Retention Volume (ft3) Vretention = Minimum of (Item 3) or (Item 6 * (Item 7 / 24)) 9 Total Retention Volume (ft3) from Harvest and Use BMP: Sum of Item 8 for all harvest and use BMP included in plan 10 Is the full DCV retained with a combination of LID HSC, retention and infiltration, and harvest and use BMPs? Yes No If yes, demonstrate conformance using Form 4.3-10. If no, then re-evaluate combinations of all LID BMP and optimize their implementation such that the maximum portion of the DCV is retained on-site (using a single BMP type or combination of BMP types). If the full DCV cannot be mitigated after this optimization process, proceed to Section 4.3.4. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 4-20 4.3.4 Biotreatment BMP Biotreatment BMPs may be considered if the full LID DCV cannot be met by maximizing retention and infiltration, and harvest and use BMPs. A key consideration when using biotreatment BMP is the effectiveness of the proposed BMP in addressing the pollutants of concern for the project (see Table 5-5 of the TGD for WQMP). Use Form 4.3-5 to summarize the potential for volume based and/or flow based biotreatment options to biotreat the remaining unmet LID DCV. Biotreatment computations are included as follows: · Use Form 4.3-6 to compute biotreatment in small volume based biotreatment BMP (e.g. bioretention w/underdrains); · Use Form 4.3-7 to compute biotreatment in large volume based biotreatment BMP (e.g. constructed wetlands); · Use Form 4.3-8 to compute sizing criteria for flow-based biotreatment BMP (e.g. bioswales) Form 4.3-5 Selection and Evaluation of Biotreatment BMP 1 Remaining LID DCV not met by site design HSC, infiltration, or harvest and use BMP for potential biotreatment (ft3): Form 4.2-1 Item 7 – Form 4.3-2 Item 30 – Form 4.3-3 Item 16- Form 4.3-4 Item 9 List pollutants of concern Copy from Form 2.3-1 2 Biotreatment BMP Selected (Select biotreatment BMP(s) necessary to ensure all pollutants of concern are addressed through Unit Operations and Processes, described in Table 5-5 of the TGD for WQMP) Volume-based biotreatment Use Forms 4.3-6 and 4.3-7 to compute treated volume Flow-based biotreatment Use Form 4.3-8 to compute treated volume Bioretention with underdrain Planter box with underdrain Constructed wetlands Wet extended detention Dry extended detention Vegetated swale Vegetated filter strip Proprietary biotreatment 3 Volume biotreated in volume based biotreatment BMP (ft3): Form 4.3-6 Item 15 + Form 4.3-7 Item 13 4 Compute remaining LID DCV with implementation of volume based biotreatment BMP (ft3): Item 1 – Item 3 5 Remaining fraction of LID DCV for sizing flow based biotreatment BMP: Item 4 / Item 1 6 Flow-based biotreatment BMP capacity provided (cfs): Use Figure 5-2 of the TGD for WQMP to determine flow capacity required to provide biotreatment of remaining percentage of unmet LID DCV (Item 5), for the project’s precipitation zone (Form 3-1 Item 1) 7 Metrics for MEP determination: Provided a WQMP with the portion of site area used for suite of LID BMP equal to minimum thresholds in Table 5-7 of the TGD for WQMP for the proposed category of development: If maximized on-site retention BMPs is feasible for partial capture, then LID BMP implementation must be optimized to retain and infiltrate the maximum portion of the DCV possible within the prescribed minimum effective area. The remaining portion of the DCV shall then be mitigated using biotreatment BMP. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 4-21 Form 4.3-6 Volume Based Biotreatment – Bioretention and Planter Boxes with Underdrains BMP Type(s) Compute runoff volume retention from proposed harvest and use BMP (Select BMPs from Table 5-4 of the TGD for WQMP) BMP Type and DA BMP Type and DA 1 Pollutants addressed with BMP List all pollutant of concern that will be effectively reduced through specific Unit Operations and Processes described in Table 5-5 of the TGD for WQMP 2 Amended soil infiltration rate Typical ~ 5.0 in/hr 3 Amended soil infiltration safety factor Typical ~ 2.0 4 Amended soil design percolation rate (in/hr) Pdesign = Item 2 / Item 3 5 Ponded water drawdown time (hr) Copy Item 6 from Form 4.2-1 6 Maximum ponding depth (ft) See Table 5-6 of the TGD for WQMP for reference to BMP design details 7 Ponding Depth (ft) dBMP = Minimum of (1/12 * Item 4 * Item 5) or Item 6 8 Amended soil surface area (ft2) 9 Amended soil depth (ft) See Table 5-6 of the TGD for WQMP for reference to BMP design details 10 Amended soil porosity, n 11 Gravel depth (ft) See Table 5-6 of the TGD for WQMP for reference to BMP design details 12 Gravel porosity, n 13 Duration of storm as basin is filling (hrs) Typical ~ 3hrs 14 Biotreated Volume (ft3) Vbiotreated = Item 8 * [(Item 7/2) + (Item 9 * Item 10) +(Item 11 * Item 12) + (Item 13 * (Item 4 / 12))] 15 Total biotreated volume from bioretention and/or planter box with underdrains BMP: Sum of Item 14 for all volume-based BMPs included in this form Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 4-22 Form 4.3-7 Volume Based Biotreatment – Constructed Wetlands and Extended Detention Biotreatment BMP Type Constructed wetlands, extended wet detention, extended dry detention, or other comparable proprietary BMP. If BMP includes multiple modules (e.g. forebay and main basin), provide separate estimates for storage and pollutants treated in each module. BMP Type and DA BMP Type and DA BMP Type and DA Forebay Basin Forebay Basin Forebay Basin 1 Pollutants addressed with BMP forebay and basin List all pollutant of concern that will be effectively reduced through specific Unit Operations and Processes described in Table 5-5 of the TGD for WQMP 2 Bottom width (ft) 3 Bottom length (ft) 4 Bottom area (ft2) Abottom = Item 2 * Item 3 5 Side slope (ft/ft) 6 Depth of storage (ft) 7 Water surface area (ft2) Asurface = (Item 2 + (2 * Item 5 * Item 6)) * (Item 3 + (2 * Item 5 * Item 6)) 8 Storage volume (ft3) For BMP with a forebay, ensure fraction of total storage is within ranges specified in BMP specific fact sheets, see Table 5-6 of the TGD for WQMP for reference to BMP design details V =Item 6 / 3 * [Item 4 + Item 7 + (Item 4 * Item 7)0.5] 9 Drawdown Time (hrs) Copy Item 6 from Form 2.1 10 Outflow rate (cfs) QBMP = (Item 8forebay + Item 8basin) / (Item 9 * 3600) 11 Duration of design storm event (hrs) 12 Biotreated Volume (ft3) Vbiotreated = (Item 8forebay + Item 8basin) +( Item 10 * Item 11 * 3600) 13 Total biotreated volume from constructed wetlands, extended dry detention, or extended wet detention: (Sum of Item 12 for all BMP included in plan) Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 4-23 Form 4.3-8 Flow Based Biotreatment Biotreatment BMP Type Vegetated swale, vegetated filter strip, or other comparable proprietary BMP BMP Type and DA BMP Type and DA BMP Type and DA 1 Pollutants addressed with BMP List all pollutant of concern that will be effectively reduced through specific Unit Operations and Processes described in TGD Table 5-5 2 Flow depth for water quality treatment (ft) BMP specific, see Table 5-6 of the TGD for WQMP for reference to BMP design details 3 Bed slope (ft/ft) BMP specific, see Table 5-6 of the TGD for WQMP for reference to BMP design details 4 Manning's roughness coefficient 5 Bottom width (ft) bw = (Form 4.3-5 Item 6 * Item 4) / (1.49 * Item 21.67 * Item 30.5) 6 Side Slope (ft/ft) BMP specific, see Table 5-6 of the TGD for WQMP for reference to BMP design details 7 Cross sectional area (ft2) A = (Item 5 * Item 2) + (Item 6 * Item 2^2) 8 Water quality flow velocity (ft/sec) V = Form 4.3-5 Item 6 / Item 7 9 Hydraulic residence time (min) Pollutant specific, see Table 5-6 of the TGD for WQMP for reference to BMP design details 10 Length of flow based BMP (ft) L = Item 8 * Item 9 * 60 11 Water surface area at water quality flow depth (ft2) SAtop = (Item 5 + (2 * Item 2 * Item 6)) * Item 10 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 4-24 4.3.5 Conformance Summary Complete Form 4.3-9 to demonstrate how on-site LID DCV is met with proposed site design hydrologic source control, infiltration, harvest and use, and/or biotreatment BMP. The bottom line of the form is used to describe the basis for infeasibility determination for on-site LID BMP to achieve full LID DCV, and provides methods for computing remaining volume to be addressed in an alternative compliance plan. If the project has more than one outlet, then complete additional versions of this form for each outlet. Form 4.3-9 Conformance Summary and Alternative Compliance Volume Estimate (DA 1) 1 Total LID DCV for the Project (ft3): 811,733 Copy Item 7 in Form 4.2-1 2 On-site retention with site design hydrologic source control LID BMP (ft3): 0 Copy Item 30 in Form 4.3-2 3 On-site retention with LID infiltration BMP (ft3): 886,928 Copy Item 16 in Form 4.3-3 4 On-site retention with LID harvest and use BMP (ft3): 0 Copy Item 9 in Form 4.3-4 5 On-site biotreatment with volume based biotreatment BMP (ft3): 0 Copy Item 3 in Form 4.3-5 6 Flow capacity provided by flow based biotreatment BMP (cfs): 0 Copy Item 6 in Form 4.3-5 7 LID BMP performance criteria are achieved if answer to any of the following is “Yes”: · Full retention of LID DCV with site design HSC, infiltration, or harvest and use BMP: Yes No If yes, sum of Items 2, 3, and 4 is greater than Item 1 · Combination of on-site retention BMPs for a portion of the LID DCV and volume-based biotreatment BMP that address all pollutants of concern for the remaining LID DCV: Yes No If yes, a) sum of Items 2, 3, 4, and 5 is greater than Item 1, and Items 2, 3 and 4 are maximized; or b) Item 6 is greater than Form 4.3--5 Item 6 and Items 2, 3 and 4 are maximized · On-site retention and infiltration is determined to be infeasible and biotreatment BMP provide biotreatment for all pollutants of concern for full LID DCV: Yes No If yes, Form 4.3-1 Items 7 and 8 were both checked yes 8 If the LID DCV is not achieved by any of these means, then the project may be allowed to develop an alternative compliance plan. Check box that describes the scenario which caused the need for alternative compliance: Combination of HSC, retention and infiltration, harvest and use, and biotreatment BMPs provide less than full LID DCV capture. Checked yes for Form 4.3-5 Item 7, Item 6 is zero, and sum of Items 2, 3, 4, and 5 is less than Item 1. If so, apply water quality credits and calculate volume for alternative compliance, Valt = (Item 1 – Item 2 – Item 3 – Item 4 – Item 5) * (100 - Form 2.4-1 Item 2)% An approved Watershed Action Plan (WAP) demonstrates that water quality and hydrologic impacts of urbanization are more effective when managed in at an off-site facility. Attach appropriate WAP section, including technical documentation, showing effectiveness comparisons for the project site and regional watershed Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 4-25 4.3.6 Hydromodification Control BMP Use Form 4.3-10 to compute the remaining runoff volume retention, after LID BMP are implemented, needed to address HCOC, and the increase in time of concentration and decrease in peak runoff necessary to meet targets for protection of waterbodies with a potential HCOC. Describe hydromodification control BMP that address HCOC, which may include off-site BMP and/or in-stream controls. Section 5.6 of the TGD for WQMP provides additional details on selection and evaluation of hydromodification control BMP. Form 4.3-10 Hydromodification Control BMPs 1 Volume reduction needed for HCOC performance criteria (ft3): (Form 4.2-2 Item 4 * 0.95) – Form 4.2-2 Item 1 2 On-site retention with site design hydrologic source control, infiltration, and harvest and use LID BMP (ft3): Sum of Form 4.3-9 Items 2, 3, and 4. Evaluate option to increase implementation of on-site retention in Forms 4.3-2, 4.3-3, and 4.3-4 in excess of LID DCV toward achieving HCOC volume reduction 3 Remaining volume for HCOC volume capture (ft3): Item 1 – Item 2 4 Volume capture provided by incorporating additional on-site or off-site retention BMPs (ft3): Existing downstream BMP may be used to demonstrate additional volume capture (if so, attach to this WQMP a hydrologic analysis showing how the additional volume would be retained during a 2-yr storm event for the regional watershed) 5 If Item 4 is less than Item 3, incorporate in-stream controls on downstream waterbody segment to prevent impacts due to hydromodification  Attach in-stream control BMP selection and evaluation to this WQMP 6 Is Form 4.2-2 Item 11 less than or equal to 5%: Yes No If yes, HCOC performance criteria is achieved. If no, select one or more mitigation options below: Demonstrate increase in time of concentration achieved by proposed LID site design, LID BMP, and additional on-site or off-site retention BMP. BMP upstream of a waterbody segment with a potential HCOC may be used to demonstrate increased time of concentration through hydrograph attenuation (if so, show that the hydraulic residence time provided in BMP for a 2-year storm event is equal or greater than the addition time of concentration requirement in Form 4.2-4 Item 15) Increase time of concentration by preserving pre-developed flow path and/or increase travel time by reducing slope and increasing cross-sectional area and roughness for proposed on-site conveyance facilities. Incorporate appropriate in-stream controls for downstream waterbody segment to prevent impacts due to hydromodification, in a plan approved and signed by a licensed engineer in the State of California. 7 Form 4.2-2 Item 12 less than or equal to 5%: Yes No If yes, HCOC performance criteria are achieved. If no, select one or more mitigation options below: Demonstrate reduction in peak runoff achieved by proposed LID site design, LID BMPs, and additional on-site or off-site retention BMPs. BMPs upstream of a waterbody segment with a potential HCOC may be used to demonstrate additional peak runoff reduction through hydrograph attenuation (if so, attach to this WQMP, a hydrograph analysis showing how the peak runoff would be reduced during a 2-yr storm event) Incorporate appropriate in-stream controls for downstream waterbody segment to prevent impacts due to hydromodification, in a plan approved and signed by a licensed engineer in the State of California. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 4-26 4.4 Alternative Compliance Plan (if applicable) Describe an alternative compliance plan (if applicable) for projects not fully able to infiltrate, harvest and use, or biotreat the DCV via on-site LID practices. A project proponent must develop an alternative compliance plan to address the remainder of the LID DCV. Depending on project type some projects may qualify for water quality credits that can be applied to reduce the DCV that must be treated prior to development of an alternative compliance plan (see Form 2.4-1, Water Quality Credits). Form 4.3-9 Item 8 includes instructions on how to apply water quality credits when computing the DCV that must be met through alternative compliance. Alternative compliance plans may include one or more of the following elements: · On-site structural treatment control BMP - All treatment control BMP should be located as close to possible to the pollutant sources and should not be located within receiving waters; · Off-site structural treatment control BMP - Pollutant removal should occur prior to discharge of runoff to receiving waters; · Urban runoff fund or In-lieu program, if available Depending upon the proposed alternative compliance plan, approval by the executive officer may or may not be required (see Section 6 of the TGD for WQMP). Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 5-1 Section 5 Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP All BMP included as part of the project WQMP are required to be maintained through regular scheduled inspection and maintenance (refer to Section 8, Post Construction BMP Requirements, in the TGD for WQMP). Fully complete Form 5-1 summarizing all BMP included in the WQMP. Attach additional forms as needed. The WQMP shall also include a detailed Operation and Maintenance Plan for all BMP and may require a Maintenance Agreement (consult the jurisdiction’s LIP). If a Maintenance Agreement is required, it must also be attached to the WQMP. Form 5-1 BMP Inspection and Maintenance BMP Responsible Party(ies) Inspection/Maintenance Activities Required Minimum Frequency of Activities Infiltration Basin Owner Maintenance activities include repairing undercut and eroded areas at inflow and outflow structures. Remove trash, debris, grass clippings, trees, and other large vegetation from the basin and dispose of properly. Standing water that does not drain within 48 hours will need to be scraped until good drainage is reestablished. All maintenance activities should be conducted by hand labor. Heavy equipment shall not be used on the basin in order to prevent any type of soil compaction that would affect infiltration rates. The infiltration basin shall be inspected and maintained after every rain event that is greater than 0.5-inches. Drain Inserts Owner Visually inspect for defects and illegal dumping. Notify proper authorities if illegal dumping has occurred. Using an industrial vacuum, the collected materials shall be removed from the filter basket and disposed of properly. Inspect biosorb hydrocarbon boom and replace as necessary. Inspected semi-annually (by October 1st and February 1st) and maintain, upon reaching 25% capacity, through maintenance service contract with the vendor or equally qualified contractor. Hydrodynamic Separator Owner Visual inspection to quantify the accumulation of hydrocarbons, trash, and sediment in the system. Use vacuum truck to clean and remove pollutants from the system upon reaching 75% capacity. Clean area outside of the screen if pollutant build-up exists. Visually inspect twice a year (spring and fall) or as frequently as needed. Vacuum frequency as determined by inspection. N1: Education of Property Owners, Tenants and Occupants on Stormwater BMPs Owner Property owner will familiarize him/herself with the educational materials in Attachment “E” and the contents of the WQMP. Annually for all employees and within 2 months for new hires. N2: Activity Restrictions Owner No outdoor work areas, processing, storage or wash area. Ongoing N3: Landscape Management BMPs Owner Irrigation must be consistent with the local agency’s Water Conservation Ordinance. Fertilizer and pesticide usage will be consistent with local agency’s Management Guidelines for Use of Fertilizers and Pesticides. Ongoing N4: BMP Maintenance Owner BMP maintenance, implementation schedules, and responsible parties are included with each specific BMP narrative. As described in each BMP. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 5-2 Form 5-1 BMP Inspection and Maintenance BMP Responsible Party(ies) Inspection/Maintenance Activities Required Minimum Frequency of Activities N7: Spill Contingency Plan Owner Owner/tenant will have a spill contingency plan based on individual site needs. Ongoing N10: Uniform Fire Code Implementation Owner Owner will comply with Article 80 of the Uniform Fire Code enforced by the fire protection agency. Ongoing N11: Litter/Debris Control Program Owner Contract with their landscape maintenance firm to provide this service during regularly schedule maintenance. Weekly N12: Employee Training Owner The owner will ensure that tenants are also familiar with onsite BMPs and necessary maintenance required of the tenants. Owner will check with City and County at least once a year to obtain new or updated educational materials and provide these materials to tenants. Employees shall be trained to clean up spills and participate in ongoing maintenance. The WQMP requires annual employee training and new hires within 2 months. Annually for all employees and within 2 months for new hires. N13: Housekeeping of Loading Docks Owner Keep all fluids indoors. Clean up spills immediately and keep spills from entering storm drain system. No direct discharges into the storm drain system. Area shall be inspected weekly for proper containment and practices with spills cleaned up immediately and disposed of properly. Ongoing N14: Catch Basin Inspection Program Owner Monthly inspection by property owner’s designee. Vacuum basin when sediment or trash becomes 2-inches deep and dispose of properly. Monthly inspection and maintain as necessary. N15: Vacuum Sweeping of Private Streets and Parking Lots Owner All landscape maintenance contractors will be required to sweep up all landscape cuttings, mowings and fertilizer materials off paved areas weekly and dispose of properly. Parking areas and drive ways will be swept monthly by sweeping contractor. Monthly N17: Comply with all other applicable NPDES permits Owner Will comply with Construction General Permit and Industrial General (may apply for No Exposure Certification/NEC). Ongoing S1: Provide storm drain system stenciling and signage (CASQA New Development BMP Handbook SD-13) Owner “No Dumping – Drains to River” stencils will be applied. Legibility of stencil will be maintained on a yearly basis. Annually S3: Design and construct trash and waste storage areas to reduce pollution introduction (CASQA New Development BMP Handbook SD-32) Owner Paved with an impervious surface, designed not to allow run-on from adjoining areas, designed to divert drainage from adjoining roofs and pavements diverted around the area, screened or walled to prevent off-site transport of trash. Provide solid roof or awning to prevent direct contact with rainfall. Ongoing Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 5-3 Form 5-1 BMP Inspection and Maintenance BMP Responsible Party(ies) Inspection/Maintenance Activities Required Minimum Frequency of Activities S4: Use efficient irrigation systems & landscape design, water conservation, smart controllers, and source control (Statewide Model Landscape Ordinance; CASQA New Development BMP Handbook SD-12) Owner Irrigation systems shall include shutoff valves triggered by a pressure drop to control water loss in the event of broken sprinkler heads or lines. Timers will be used to avoid over watering and watering cycles and duration shall be adjusted seasonally by the landscape maintenance contractor. The landscaping areas will be grouped with plants that have similar water requirements. Native or drought tolerant species shall also be used where appropriate to reduce excess irrigation runoff and promote surface filtration. Adjust watering cycles and duration seasonally / quarterly. S5: Finish grade of landscaped areas at a minimum of 1-2 inches below top of curb, sidewalk, or pavement Owner Landscaped areas will be depressed in order to increase retention of stormwater/irrigation water and promote infiltration. Ongoing Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 6-1 Section 6 WQMP Attachments 6.1 Site Plan and Drainage Plan Include a site plan and drainage plan sheet set containing the following minimum information: · Project location · Site boundary · Land uses and land covers, as applicable · Suitability/feasibility constraints · Structural Source Control BMP locations · Site Design Hydrologic Source Control BMP locations · LID BMP details · Drainage delineations and flow information · Drainage connections See Attachment C for WQMP Site Map. 6.2 Electronic Data Submittal Minimum requirements include submittal of PDF exhibits in addition to hard copies. Format must not require specialized software to open. If the local jurisdiction requires specialized electronic document formats (consult the LIP), this section will describe the contents (e.g., layering, nomenclature, geo-referencing, etc.) of these documents so that they may be interpreted efficiently and accurately. 6.3 Post Construction Attach all O&M Plans and Maintenance Agreements for BMP to the WQMP (Attachment D). 6.4 Other Supporting Documentation · WQMP Certification (Section 6.5) · BMP Design Calculations & Supporting Documentation (Attachment B) · Memorandum of Agreement for Water Quality Management Plan and Storm Water BMP Transfer, Access and Maintenance (Attachment D) · BMP Educational Materials (Attachment E) · Infiltration Report (Attachment F) · Hydrologic Conditions of Concern (HCOC) (Attachment G) Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) West Valley Logistics Center IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC 6-2 6.5 WQMP Certification Certifications I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. Developer’s Project Engineer Signature Signature Date I/we certify that I/we am/are the legal owner of the project and hereby accept responsibility for the implementation of the provisions of this SWQMP as long as I/we retain ownership of this property and that upon the sale of this land, I/we will deliver this plan to the future owner and inform him of the requirement to implement the plan. Owner(s) Signature Stephen Hollis VP Construction, Western Region Name Title Signature Date for use by City of Fontana only Environmental Section Approval of SWQMP I, and /or personnel acting under my direction and supervision, have reviewed this SWQMP and find that it meets the requirements set forth in the City of Fontana’s Storm Water Ordinance. Acceptance or approval of this Storm Water Quality Management Plan in no way precludes the authority of this agency to require modification to the plan as conditions warrant nor does this agency take responsibility for performance of BMPs provided for in the Plan. Signature Date of SWQMP Approval Attachment A Existing Condition Site Photos Attachment B BMP Design Calculations & Supporting Documentation www.nws.noaa.gov Home Site Map News Organization Search NWS All NOAA Go General Information Homepage Progress Reports FAQ Glossary Precipitation Frequency Data Server GIS Grids Maps Time Series Temporals Documents Performance Probable Maximum Precipitation Documents Miscellaneous Publications Storm Analysis Record Precipitation Contact Us Inquiries List-server Data description Data type: Precipitation depth Units: English Time series type:Partial duration  Select location 1) Manually: a) By location(decimal degrees, use "-" for S and W): Latitude: 34.041216 Longitude: -117.41199 Submit b) By station(list of CA stations): Select station  c) By address 2) Use map (if ESRI interactive map is not loading, try adding the host: https://js.arcgis.com/ to the firewall, or contact us at hdsc.questions@noaa.gov): a) Select location Move crosshair or double click b) Click on station icon Show stations on map Location information: Name: Fontana, California, USA* Latitude: 34.0412° Longitude: -117.4120° Elevation: 1021.2 ft ** * Source: ESRI Maps ** Source: USGS PF tabular PF graphical Supplementary information PDS-based precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches)1 Duration Average recurrence interval (years) 1 2 5 10 25 50 100 200 500 1000 5-min 0.104 (0.087-0.127) 0.135 (0.113-0.164) 0.176 (0.146-0.215) 0.211 (0.173-0.259) 0.259 (0.206-0.328) 0.296 (0.231-0.385) 0.336 (0.255-0.447) 0.377 (0.278-0.517) 0.436 (0.308-0.624) 0.484 (0.329-0.717) 10-min 0.150 (0.125-0.181) 0.194 (0.161-0.235) 0.253 (0.210-0.308) 0.302 (0.249-0.371) 0.371 (0.295-0.471) 0.425 (0.330-0.551) 0.481 (0.365-0.641) 0.541 (0.399-0.742) 0.625 (0.441-0.894) 0.693 (0.472-1.03) 15-min 0.181 (0.151-0.219) 0.234 (0.195-0.284) 0.306 (0.254-0.372) 0.365 (0.301-0.448) 0.448 (0.356-0.569) 0.514 (0.400-0.667) 0.582 (0.441-0.775) 0.654 (0.482-0.897) 0.756 (0.534-1.08) 0.838 (0.571-1.24) 30-min 0.270 (0.225-0.328) 0.350 (0.291-0.425) 0.457 (0.379-0.555) 0.545 (0.449-0.669) 0.669 (0.532-0.850) 0.767 (0.597-0.996) 0.869 (0.659-1.16) 0.977 (0.720-1.34) 1.13 (0.797-1.62) 1.25 (0.853-1.86) 60-min 0.395 (0.329-0.479) 0.511 (0.426-0.621) 0.667 (0.554-0.812) 0.797 (0.656-0.978) 0.978 (0.778-1.24) 1.12 (0.872-1.46) 1.27 (0.963-1.69) 1.43 (1.05-1.96) 1.65 (1.16-2.36) 1.83 (1.25-2.71) 2-hr 0.578 (0.482-0.701) 0.742 (0.617-0.900) 0.957 (0.794-1.16) 1.13 (0.933-1.39) 1.38 (1.10-1.75) 1.57 (1.22-2.03) 1.76 (1.34-2.35) 1.97 (1.45-2.69) 2.25 (1.59-3.22) 2.47 (1.68-3.67) 3-hr 0.720 (0.600-0.873) 0.921 (0.766-1.12) 1.18 (0.983-1.44) 1.40 (1.15-1.72) 1.69 (1.35-2.15) 1.92 (1.49-2.49) 2.15 (1.63-2.86) 2.39 (1.76-3.28) 2.72 (1.92-3.90) 2.99 (2.04-4.43) 6-hr 1.01 (0.844-1.23) 1.30 (1.08-1.57) 1.66 (1.38-2.03) 1.96 (1.62-2.41) 2.37 (1.88-3.00) 2.67 (2.08-3.47) 2.99 (2.27-3.98) 3.31 (2.44-4.54) 3.75 (2.65-5.36) 4.09 (2.79-6.07) 12-hr 1.34 1.73 2.23 2.63 3.17 3.58 3.99 4.42 4.99 5.43 NOAA ATLAS 14 POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES: CA  POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY (PF) ESTIMATES WITH 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVALS AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 6, Version 2 Print page Search + – 1km 0.6mi Map   Terrain Page 1 of 2PF Map: Contiguous US 2/7/2018https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_map_cont.html?bkmrk=ca (1.12-1.63) (1.44-2.10) (1.85-2.71) (2.17-3.23) (2.52-4.03) (2.78-4.65) (3.03-5.32) (3.25-6.05) (3.52-7.14) (3.70-8.05) 24-hr 1.79 (1.59-2.07) 2.34 (2.06-2.70) 3.04 (2.68-3.51) 3.60 (3.15-4.20) 4.35 (3.69-5.24) 4.92 (4.08-6.06) 5.50 (4.45-6.93) 6.09 (4.80-7.88) 6.88 (5.20-9.27) 7.49 (5.48-10.4) 2-day 2.17 (1.93-2.51) 2.89 (2.55-3.33) 3.81 (3.36-4.41) 4.56 (3.99-5.32) 5.57 (4.72-6.71) 6.34 (5.26-7.80) 7.13 (5.77-8.98) 7.93 (6.25-10.3) 9.02 (6.82-12.2) 9.87 (7.22-13.8) 3-day 2.34 (2.07-2.69) 3.15 (2.78-3.63) 4.21 (3.71-4.87) 5.08 (4.44-5.92) 6.26 (5.30-7.54) 7.17 (5.95-8.82) 8.10 (6.56-10.2) 9.06 (7.14-11.7) 10.4 (7.85-14.0) 11.4 (8.33-15.9) 4-day 2.51 (2.23-2.90) 3.42 (3.03-3.95) 4.61 (4.07-5.34) 5.59 (4.89-6.52) 6.93 (5.87-8.35) 7.97 (6.61-9.80) 9.03 (7.31-11.4) 10.1 (7.98-13.1) 11.6 (8.81-15.7) 12.8 (9.38-17.9) 7-day 2.88 (2.55-3.32) 3.97 (3.51-4.58) 5.40 (4.76-6.25) 6.58 (5.76-7.68) 8.21 (6.95-9.89) 9.47 (7.86-11.7) 10.8 (8.73-13.6) 12.1 (9.56-15.7) 14.0 (10.6-18.9) 15.5 (11.3-21.6) 10-day 3.13 (2.77-3.60) 4.34 (3.83-5.01) 5.94 (5.23-6.87) 7.26 (6.35-8.47) 9.08 (7.69-10.9) 10.5 (8.71-12.9) 12.0 (9.70-15.1) 13.5 (10.7-17.5) 15.7 (11.8-21.1) 17.4 (12.7-24.2) 20-day 3.78 (3.35-4.36) 5.29 (4.68-6.10) 7.30 (6.44-8.45) 8.98 (7.85-10.5) 11.3 (9.57-13.6) 13.2 (10.9-16.2) 15.1 (12.2-19.0) 17.1 (13.5-22.1) 20.0 (15.1-26.9) 22.2 (16.3-31.0) 30-day 4.48 (3.97-5.17) 6.27 (5.54-7.23) 8.66 (7.64-10.0) 10.7 (9.33-12.4) 13.5 (11.4-16.2) 15.7 (13.0-19.3) 18.1 (14.6-22.8) 20.6 (16.2-26.7) 24.1 (18.3-32.5) 27.0 (19.8-37.7) 45-day 5.35 (4.74-6.17) 7.42 (6.56-8.57) 10.2 (9.01-11.8) 12.6 (11.0-14.7) 15.9 (13.5-19.2) 18.6 (15.4-22.9) 21.4 (17.3-27.0) 24.5 (19.3-31.7) 28.8 (21.8-38.8) 32.4 (23.7-45.1) 60-day 6.27 (5.55-7.22) 8.59 (7.59-9.91) 11.7 (10.4-13.6) 14.4 (12.6-16.8) 18.2 (15.4-22.0) 21.3 (17.7-26.2) 24.5 (19.9-30.9) 28.1 (22.1-36.3) 33.1 (25.1-44.7) 37.3 (27.3-52.0) 1 Precipitation frequency (PF) estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duration series (PDS). Numbers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval. The probability that precipitation frequency estimates (for a given duration and average recurrence interval) will be greater than the upper bound (or less than the lower bound) is 5%. Estimates at upper bounds are not checked against probable maximum precipitation (PMP) estimates and may be higher than currently valid PMP values. Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 document for more information. Estimates from the table in CSV format: Precipitation frequency estimates Submit Main Link Categories: Home | OWP US Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service Office of Water Prediction (OWP) 1325 East West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910 Page Author:HDSC webmaster Page last modified: April 21, 2017 Map Disclaimer Disclaimer Credits Glossary Privacy Policy About Us Career Opportunities Page 2 of 2PF Map: Contiguous US 2/7/2018https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_map_cont.html?bkmrk=ca Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www.ocwatersheds.com/WQMP.aspx Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Rate Worksheet (Entire Site) Factor Category Factor Description Assigned Weight (w) Factor Value (v) Product (p) p = w x v A Suitability Assessment Soil assessment methods 0.25 1 0.25 Predominant soil texture 0.25 1 0.25 Site soil variability 0.25 1 0.25 Depth to groundwater / impervious layer 0.25 1 0.25 Suitability Assessment Safety Factor, SA = Sp 1.00 B Design Tributary area size 0.25 3 0.75 Level of pretreatment/expected sediment loads 0.25 2 0.50 Redundancy 0.25 3 0.75 Compaction during construction 0.25 2 0.50 Design Safety Factor, SB = Sp 2.50 Combined Safety Factor, STOT= SA x SB 2.50 Measured Infiltration Rate, inch/hr, KM (corrected for test-specific bias) 18.0 Design Infiltration Rate, in/hr, KDESIGN = KM / STOT 7.2 Supporting Data Briefly describe infiltration test and provide reference to test forms: A site-specific double-ring infiltrometer test was conducted at the location of the BMP to support a measured rate of 18.0 in/hr. The design rate is 7.2 in/hr after applying the appropriate safety factor. This design rate is suitable for infiltration facilities. Note: The minimum combined adjustment factor shall not be less than 2.0 and the maximum combined adjustment factor shall not exceed 9.0. FLOW-BASED BMP DESIGN (pretreatment) CBMP = 0.858(imp)3 – 0.78(imp)2 + 0.774(imp) + 0.04 IBMP = (0.511)(0.2787)(2) = 0.285 in/hr Q = CBMP * 0.285 * Area BUILDING 1 CDS Region Valley Drainage Area (acres) 26.25 acres Drainage Area (sq-ft) 1,143,450 sq-ft Impervious Coeff i = 0.95 < 1.0 Runoff Coeff C = 0.81 1-hr 2-yr from NOAA 0.511 Intensity Coeff 0.2787 Intensity BMP (in/hr) 0.285 Flow (cfs) Q = 6.03 Use one (1) Contech CDS4045-8 Q-required = 6.03 cfs Q-provided = 7.50 cfs BUILDING 2 CDS Region Valley Drainage Area (acres) 24.10 acres Drainage Area (sq-ft) 1,049,796 sq-ft Impervious Coeff i = 0.95 < 1.0 Runoff Coeff C = 0.81 1-hr 2-yr from NOAA 0.511 Intensity Coeff 0.2787 Intensity BMP (in/hr) 0.285 Flow (cfs) Q = 5.54 Use one (1) Contech CDS4040-8 Q-required = 5.54 cfs Q-provided = 6.00 cfs BUILDING 3 CDS Region Valley Drainage Area (acres) 24.65 acres Drainage Area (sq-ft) 1,073,754 sq-ft Impervious Coeff i = 0.95 < 1.0 Runoff Coeff C = 0.81 1-hr 2-yr from NOAA 0.511 Intensity Coeff 0.2787 Intensity BMP (in/hr) 0.285 Flow (cfs) Q = 5.67 Use one (1) Contech CDS4040-8 Q-required = 5.67 cfs Q-provided = 6.00 cfs BUILDING 4 CDS Region Valley Drainage Area (acres) 12.65 acres Drainage Area (sq-ft) 551,034 sq-ft Impervious Coeff i = 0.95 < 1.0 Runoff Coeff C = 0.81 1-hr 2-yr from NOAA 0.511 Intensity Coeff 0.2787 Intensity BMP (in/hr) 0.285 Flow (cfs) Q = 2.91 Use one (1) Contech CDS3030-6 Q-required 2.91 cfs Q-provided = 3.00 cfs BUILDING 5 CDS Region Valley Drainage Area (acres) 6.00 acres Drainage Area (sq-ft) 261,360 sq-ft Impervious Coeff i = 0.95 < 1.0 Runoff Coeff C = 0.81 1-hr 2-yr from NOAA 0.511 Intensity Coeff 0.2787 Intensity BMP (in/hr) 0.285 Flow (cfs) Q = 1.38 Use one (1) Contech CDS2025-5 Q-required 1.38 cfs Q-provided = 1.60 cfs VOLUME-BASED BMP DESIGN CBMP = 0.858(imp)3 – 0.78(imp)2 + 0.774(imp) + 0.04 P6 = (0.511)(1.4807) = 0.757 inches P0 = (1.582)(CBMP)(0.757) DCV = (P0 * Area) / 12 DA 1 DMA A – ONSITE AND OFFSITE DEVELOPMENT – INFILTRATION BASIN Region Valley Drainage Area (acres) 193.55 acres Drainage Area (sq-ft) 8,431,038 sq-ft Impervious Coeff i = 0.95 < 1.0 Runoff Coeff C = 0.807 1-hr 2-yr from NOAA 0.511 P6 Coeff 1.4807 Mean 6-hr (P6) 0.757 Drawdown Rate (a) 1.582 DCV 678,666 cu-ft DCV 15.580 acre-ft DA 1 DMA B – BASIN AREAS – INFILTRATION BASIN Region Valley Drainage Area (acres) 17.50 acres Drainage Area (sq-ft) 762,300 sq-ft Impervious Coeff i = 0.1 < 1.0 Runoff Coeff C = 0.110 1-hr 2-yr from NOAA 0.511 P6 Coeff 1.4807 Mean 6-hr (P6) 0.757 Drawdown Rate (a) 1.582 DCV 8,399 cu-ft DCV 0.193 acre-ft DA 1 DMA C – OPEN SPACE/BASIN AREAS – INFILTRATION BASIN Region Valley Drainage Area (acres) 259.75 acres Drainage Area (sq-ft) 11,314,710 sq-ft Impervious Coeff i = 0.1 < 1.0 Runoff Coeff C = 0.110 1-hr 2-yr from NOAA 0.511 P6 Coeff 1.4807 Mean 6-hr (P6) 0.757 Drawdown Rate (a) 1.582 DCV 124,668 cu-ft DCV 2.862 acre-ft Total DCV = 678,666 cu-ft + 8,399 cu-ft + 124,668 cu-ft = 811,733 cu-ft Design infiltration rate = 7.2 in/hr dmax = 172.8 inches = Design infiltration rate x 24 hours = 7.2 in/hr x 24 hrs dBMP = 4.50 ft = 54 inches dmax > dBMP Basin calculations: Bottom infiltrating area = 197,095 sq-ft Depth of basin = 4.50 ft Total volume treated = 197,095 sq-ft x 4.50 ft = 886,928 cu-ft Attachment C WQMP Site Map CDS IDAREA (AC)Q REQUIRED (CFS)Q PROVIDED (CFS)ModelBLDG 1 CDS26.256.037.50CDS4045-8BLDG 2 CDS24.105.546.00CDS4040-8BLDG 3 CDS24.655.676.00CDS4040-8BLDG 4 CDS12.652.913.00CDS3030-6BLDG 5 CDS6.001.381.60CDS2025-5DA DMAAREA (AC)BMP IDDCV (CF)BOTTOM INFILTRATING AREA (SF)PONDING DEPTH (FT)VOLUME PROVIDED (CF)DA 1 DMA A193.55INFILTRATIONBASIN811,733197,0954.50886,928DA 1 DMA B17.50DA 1 DMA C259.75 CDS IDAREA (AC)Q REQUIRED (CFS)Q PROVIDED (CFS)ModelBLDG 1 CDS26.256.037.50CDS4045-8BLDG 2 CDS24.105.546.00CDS4040-8BLDG 3 CDS24.655.676.00CDS4040-8BLDG 4 CDS12.652.913.00CDS3030-6BLDG 5 CDS6.001.381.60CDS2025-5DA DMAAREA (AC)BMP IDDCV (CF)BOTTOM INFILTRATING AREA (SF)PONDING DEPTH (FT)VOLUME PROVIDED (CF)DA 1 DMA A193.55INFILTRATIONBASIN811,733197,0954.50886,928DA 1 DMA B17.50DA 1 DMA C259.75 CDS IDAREA (AC)Q REQUIRED (CFS)Q PROVIDED (CFS)ModelBLDG 1 CDS26.256.037.50CDS4045-8BLDG 2 CDS24.105.546.00CDS4040-8BLDG 3 CDS24.655.676.00CDS4040-8BLDG 4 CDS12.652.913.00CDS3030-6BLDG 5 CDS6.001.381.60CDS2025-5DA DMAAREA (AC)BMP IDDCV (CF)BOTTOM INFILTRATING AREA (SF)PONDING DEPTH (FT)VOLUME PROVIDED (CF)DA 1 DMA A193.55INFILTRATIONBASIN811,733197,0954.50886,928DA 1 DMA B17.50DA 1 DMA C259.75 CDS IDAREA (AC)Q REQUIRED (CFS)Q PROVIDED (CFS)ModelBLDG 1 CDS26.256.037.50CDS4045-8BLDG 2 CDS24.105.546.00CDS4040-8BLDG 3 CDS24.655.676.00CDS4040-8BLDG 4 CDS12.652.913.00CDS3030-6BLDG 5 CDS6.001.381.60CDS2025-5DA DMAAREA (AC)BMP IDDCV (CF)BOTTOM INFILTRATING AREA (SF)PONDING DEPTH (FT)VOLUME PROVIDED (CF)DA 1 DMA A193.55INFILTRATIONBASIN811,733197,0954.50886,928DA 1 DMA B17.50DA 1 DMA C259.75 Attachment D WQMP and Stormwater BMP Transfer, Access and Maintenance Agreement Page 1 of 7 RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CITY OF FONTANA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 8353 SIERRA AVENUE, FONTANA CA 92335 SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY Memorandum of Agreement for Water Quality Management Plan and Storm Water BMP Transfer, Access and Maintenance OWNER/APPLICANT NAME: IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC PROPERTY ADDRESS: Locust Avenue and Armstrong Road Fontana, CA 92337 APN: 0194-401-04, 05, 09 / 0256-131-05, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 / 0256-141-36 THIS Memorandum of Agreement hereinafter referred to as "Agreement" is made and entered on this __________ day of ______________, 2022 by the undersigned herein after referred to as "Owner" and the City of Fontana, a municipal corporation, located in the County of San Bernardino, State of California hereinafter referred to as "CITY"; WHEREAS, the Owner owns real property ("Property") in the City of Fontana, County of San Bernardino, State of California, more specifically described in Exhibit "A" and depicted in Exhibit "B", each of which exhibits is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; WHEREAS, at the time of initial approval of development project within the Property described above, the City required the project to employ Best Management Practices, hereinafter referred to as "BMPs," to minimize pollutants in urban runoff; WHEREAS, the Owner has chosen to install and/or implement BMPs as described in the Water Quality Management Plan as described in Exhibit "C" and on file with the City, hereinafter referred to as "WQMP", to minimize pollutants in urban runoff and to minimize other adverse impacts of urban runoff; WHEREAS, said WQMP has been certified by the Owner and reviewed and approved by the City; WHEREAS, said BMPs, with installation and/or implementation on private property and draining only private property, are part of a private facility with all maintenance or replacement, therefore, the sole responsibility of the Owner; WHEREAS, the Owner is aware that periodic and continuous maintenance, including, but not necessarily limited to, filter material replacement and sediment removal, is required to assure peak performance of all BMPs in the WQMP and that, furthermore, such maintenance activity will require compliance with all Local, State, or Federal laws and regulations, including those pertaining to confined space and waste disposal methods, in effect at the time such maintenance occurs; Page 2 of 7 NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by the Owner as follows: 1. Owner hereby provides the City of City's designee complete access, of any duration, to the BMPs and their immediate vicinity at any time, upon reasonable notice, or in the event of emergency, as determined by City's Director of Public Works no advance notice, for the purpose of inspection, sampling, testing of the Device, and in case of emergency, to undertake all necessary repairs or other preventative measures at owner's expense as provided in paragraph 3 below. City shall make every effort at all times to minimize or avoid interference with Owner's use of the Property. 2. Owner shall use its best efforts diligently to maintain all BMPs in a manner assuring peak performance at all times. All reasonable precautions shall be exercised by Owner and Owner's representative or contractor in the removal and extraction of any material(s) from the BMPs and the ultimate disposal of the material(s) in a manner consistent with all relevant laws and regulations in effect at the time. As may be requested from time to time by the City, the Owner shall provide the City with documentation identifying the material(s) removed, the quantity, and disposal destination. 3. In the event Owner, or its successors or assigns, fails to accomplish the necessary maintenance contemplated by this Agreement, within five (5) days of being given written notice by the City, the City is hereby authorized to cause any maintenance necessary to be done and charge the entire cost and expense to the Owner or Owner's successors or assigns, including administrative costs, attorneys fees and interest thereon at the maximum rate authorized by the Civil Code from the date of the notice of expense until paid in full. 4. The Owner agrees to hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, volunteers, and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage, or injury, in law or equity, to property or persons, arising from the imposition of the plan by the City; 5. The City may require the owner to post security in form and for a time period satisfactory to the city to guarantee the performance of the obligations state herein. Should the Owner fail to perform the obligations under the Agreement, the City may, in the case of a cash bond, act for the Owner using the proceeds from it, or in the case of a surety bond, require the sureties to perform the obligations of the Agreement. As an additional remedy, the Director may withdraw any previous storm water-related approval with respect to the property on which BMPs have been installed and/or implemented until such time as Owner repays to City its reasonable costs incurred in accordance with paragraph 3 above. 6. This agreement shall be recorded in the Office of the Recorder of San Bernardino County, California, at the expense of the Owner and shall constitute notice to all successors and assigns of the title to said Property of the obligation herein set forth, and also a lien in such amount as will fully reimburse the City, including interest as herein above set forth, subject to foreclosure in event of default in payment. 7. In event of legal action occasioned by any default or action of the Owner, or its successors or assigns, then the Owner and its successors or assigns agree(s) to pay all costs incurred by the City in enforcing the terms of this Agreement, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs, and that the same shall become a part of the lien against said Property. Page 3 of 7 8. It is the intent of the parties hereto that burdens and benefits herein undertaken shall constitute covenants that run with said Property and constitute a lien there against. 9. The obligations herein undertaken shall be binding upon the heirs, successors, executors, administrators and assigns of the parties hereto. The term "Owner" shall include not only the present Owner, but also its heirs, successors, executors, administrators, and assigns. Owner shall notify any successor to title of all or part of the Property about the existence of this Agreement. Owner shall provide such notice prior to such successor obtaining an interest in all or part of the Property. Owner shall provide a copy of such notice to the City at the same time such notice is provided to the successor. 10. This Agreement shall not be amended, modified or terminated without the prior written consent of the City, which consent to be effective, shall be contained in a document executed by the City and recorded against the Real Property. OWNER: Owner/Applicant Name: IDIL West Valley Logistics Center LLC Owner/Applicant Signature: Stephen Hollis, VP Construction, Western Region Date: NOTARY Notary acknowledgement is required for recordation (attach appropriate acknowledgement). Page 4 of 7 (INSERT NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT PAGE HERE) Page 5 of 7 EXHIBIT A (Legal Description) Page 6 of 7 EXHIBIT B (Map/illustration) Page 7 of 7 EXHIBIT C (WQMP Exhibit) Attachment E Educational Materials FONTANAONTANA CITY OFCITY OF PUBLIC SERVICESPUBLIC SERVICES FONTANAONTANA C I T Y O FC I T Y O F PUBLIC SERVICESPUBLIC SERVICES FONTANAONTANA CITY OFCITY OF PUBLIC SERVICESPUBLIC SERVICES FONTANAONTANA CITY OFCITY OF PUBLIC SERVICESPUBLIC SERVICES CDS® Inspection and Maintenance Guide ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS Maintenance The CDS system should be inspected at regular intervals and maintained when necessary to ensure optimum performance. The rate at which the system collects pollutants will depend more heavily on site activities than the size of the unit. For example, unstable soils or heavy winter sanding will cause the grit chamber to fill more quickly but regular sweeping of paved surfaces will slow accumulation. Inspection Inspection is the key to effective maintenance and is easily performed. Pollutant transport and deposition may vary from year to year and regular inspections will help ensure that the system is cleaned out at the appropriate time. At a minimum, inspections should be performed twice per year (e.g. spring and fall) however more frequent inspections may be necessary in climates where winter sanding operations may lead to rapid accumulations, or in equipment washdown areas. Installations should also be inspected more frequently where excessive amounts of trash are expected. The visual inspection should ascertain that the system components are in working order and that there are no blockages or obstructions in the inlet and separation screen. The inspection should also quantify the accumulation of hydrocarbons, trash, and sediment in the system. Measuring pollutant accumulation can be done with a calibrated dipstick, tape measure or other measuring instrument. If absorbent material is used for enhanced removal of hydrocarbons, the level of discoloration of the sorbent material should also be identified during inspection. It is useful and often required as part of an operating permit to keep a record of each inspection. A simple form for doing so is provided. Access to the CDS unit is typically achieved through two manhole access covers. One opening allows for inspection and cleanout of the separation chamber (cylinder and screen) and isolated sump. The other allows for inspection and cleanout of sediment captured and retained outside the screen. For deep units, a single manhole access point would allows both sump cleanout and access outside the screen. The CDS system should be cleaned when the level of sediment has reached 75% of capacity in the isolated sump or when an appreciable level of hydrocarbons and trash has accumulated. If absorbent material is used, it should be replaced when significant discoloration has occurred. Performance will not be impacted until 100% of the sump capacity is exceeded however it is recommended that the system be cleaned prior to that for easier removal of sediment. The level of sediment is easily determined by measuring from finished grade down to the top of the sediment pile. To avoid underestimating the level of sediment in the chamber, the measuring device must be lowered to the top of the sediment pile carefully. Particles at the top of the pile typically offer less resistance to the end of the rod than consolidated particles toward the bottom of the pile. Once this measurement is recorded, it should be compared to the as-built drawing for the unit to determine weather the height of the sediment pile off the bottom of the sump floor exceeds 75% of the total height of isolated sump. Cleaning Cleaning of a CDS systems should be done during dry weather conditions when no flow is entering the system. The use of a vacuum truck is generally the most effective and convenient method of removing pollutants from the system. Simply remove the manhole covers and insert the vacuum hose into the sump. The system should be completely drained down and the sump fully evacuated of sediment. The area outside the screen should also be cleaned out if pollutant build-up exists in this area. In installations where the risk of petroleum spills is small, liquid contaminants may not accumulate as quickly as sediment. However, the system should be cleaned out immediately in the event of an oil or gasoline spill should be cleaned out immediately. Motor oil and other hydrocarbons that accumulate on a more routine basis should be removed when an appreciable layer has been captured. To remove these pollutants, it may be preferable to use absorbent pads since they are usually less expensive to dispose than the oil/water emulsion that may be created by vacuuming the oily layer. Trash and debris can be netted out to separate it from the other pollutants. The screen should be power washed to ensure it is free of trash and debris. Manhole covers should be securely seated following cleaning activities to prevent leakage of runoff into the system from above and also to ensure that proper safety precautions have been followed. Confined space entry procedures need to be followed if physical access is required. Disposal of all material removed from the CDS system should be done in accordance with local regulations. In many jurisdictions, disposal of the sediments may be handled in the same manner as the disposal of sediments removed from catch basins or deep sump manholes. CDS Diameter Distance from Water Surface Sediment Model to Top of Sediment Pile Storage Capacity ft m ft m yd3 m3 CDS2015-4 4 1.2 3.0 0.9 0.5 0.4 CDS2015 5 1.5 3.0 0.9 1.3 1.0 CDS2020 5 1.5 3.5 1.1 1.3 1.0 CDS2025 5 1.5 4.0 1.2 1.3 1.0 CDS3020 6 1.8 4.0 1.2 2.1 1.6 CDS3030 6 1.8 4.6 1.4 2.1 1.6 CDS3035 6 1.8 5.0 1.5 2.1 1.6 CDS4030 8 2.4 4.6 1.4 5.6 4.3 CDS4040 8 2.4 5.7 1.7 5.6 4.3 CDS4045 8 2.4 6.2 1.9 5.6 4.3 Table 1: CDS Maintenance Indicators and Sediment Storage Capacities 800.925.5240www.ContechES.com Support• Drawings and specifications are available at www.contechstormwater.com. • Site-specific design support is available from our engineers. ©2014 Contech Engineered Solutions LLC Contech Engineered Solutions LLC provides site solutions for the civil engineering industry. Contech’s portfolio includes bridges, drainage, sanitary sewer, stormwater, earth stabilization and wastewater treament products. For information, visit www.ContechES.com or call 800.338.1122 NOTHING IN THIS CATALOG SHOULD BE CONSTRUED AS AN EXPRESSED WARRANTY OR AN IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE. SEE THE CONTECH STANDARD CONDITION OF SALES (VIEWABLE AT WWW.CONTECHES.COM/COS) FOR MORE INFORMATION. The product(s) described may be protected by one or more of the following US patents: 5,322,629; 5,624,576; 5,707,527; 5,759,415; 5,788,848; 5,985,157; 6,027,639; 6,350,374; 6,406,218; 6,641,720; 6,511,595; 6,649,048; 6,991,114; 6,998,038; 7,186,058; 7,296,692; 7,297,266; 7,517,450 related foreign patents or other patents pending. cdsMaintenance 07/14 ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS CDS Inspection & Maintenance Log CDS Model: Location: Water Floatable Describe Maintenance Date depth to Layer Maintenance Personnel Comments sediment 1 Thickness 2 Performed —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— 1. The water depth to sediment is determined by taking two measurements with a stadia rod: one measurement from the manhole opening to the top of the sediment pile and the other from the manhole opening to the water surface. If the difference between these measurements is less than the values listed in table 1 the system should be cleaned out. Note: to avoid underestimating the volume of sediment in the chamber, the measuring device must be carefully lowered to the top of the sediment pile. 2. For optimum performance, the system should be cleaned out when the floating hydrocarbon layer accumulates to an appreciable thickness. In the event of an oil spill, the system should be cleaned immediately. OPERATION & MAINTENANCE Bio Clean Environmental Services, Inc. 398 Via El Centro Oceanside, CA 92058 www.BioCleanEnvironmental.com p: 760.433.7640 f: 760.433.3176 Curb Inlet Filter 1 | Page  OPERATION & MAINTENANCE   The Bio Clean Curb Inlet Filter is a stormwater device designed to remove high levels of trash,  debris, sediments and hydrocarbons.  The filter is available in several configurations including trash  full capture, multi‐level screening, Kraken membrane filter and media filter variations. This manual  covers maintenance procedures of the trash full capture and multi‐level screening configurations. A  supplemental manual is available for the Kraken and media filter variations. The innovative trough &  weir system is mounted along the curb face and directs incoming stormwater toward the filter  basket which is positioned “directly” under the manhole access opening regardless of its location in  the catch basin. This innovative design allows the filter to be cleaned from finish surface without  access into the catch basin, therefore drastically reducing maintenance time and eliminating  confined space entry. The filter has a lifting handle allowing for the filter to be removed easily  through the manhole. The weir also folds up to allow for unimpeded access into the basin for  routine maintenance or pipe jetting.     As with all stormwater BMPs, inspection and maintenance on the Curb Inlet Filter is necessary.  Stormwater regulations require BMPs be inspected and maintained to ensure they are operating as  designed to allow for effective pollutant removal and provide protection to receiving water bodies.  It is recommended that inspections be performed multiple times during the first year to assess site‐ specific loading conditions. This is recommended because pollutant loading can vary greatly from  site to site. Variables such as nearby soil erosion or construction sites, winter sanding of roads,  amount of daily traffic and land use can increase pollutant loading on the system. The first year of  inspections can be used to set inspection and maintenance intervals for subsequent years. Without  appropriate maintenance a BMP can exceed its storage capacity which can negatively affect its  continued performance in removing and retaining captured pollutants.                                      System Diagram:  2 | Page  Inspection Equipment    Following is a list of equipment to allow for simple and effective inspection of the Curb Inlet Filter:     Bio Clean Environmental Inspection Form (contained within this manual).    Manhole hook or appropriate tools to remove access hatches and covers.   Appropriate traffic control signage and procedures.   Protective clothing and eye protection.    Note: entering a confined space requires appropriate safety and certification. It is generally  not required for routine inspections or maintenance of the system.             Inspection Steps   The core to any successful stormwater BMP maintenance program is routine inspections. The  inspection steps required on the Curb Inlet Fitler are quick and easy. As mentioned above the first  year should be seen as the maintenance interval establishment phase. During the first year more  frequent inspections should occur in order to gather loading data and maintenance requirements  for that specific site. This information can be used to establish a base for long‐term inspection and  maintenance interval requirements.     The Curb Inlet Filter can be inspected though visual observation without entry into the catch basin.  All necessary pre‐inspection steps must be carried out before inspection occurs, such as safety  measures to protect the inspector and nearby pedestrians from any dangers associated with an  open access hatch or manhole. Once the manhole has been safely opened the inspection process  can proceed:     Prepare the inspection form by writing in the necessary information including project name,  location, date & time, unit number and other info (see inspection form).    Observe the inside of the catch basin through the manhole. If minimal light is available and  vision into the unit is impaired utilize a flashlight to see inside the catch basin.    Look for any out of the ordinary obstructions in the catch basin, trough, weir, filter basket,  basin floor our outlet pipe. Write down any observations on the inspection form.    Through observation and/or digital photographs estimate the amount of trash, foliage and  sediment accumulated inside the filter basket. Record this information on the inspection  form.    Observe the condition and color of the hydrocarbon boom. Record this information on the  inspection form.   3 | Page   Finalize inspection report for analysis by the maintenance manager to determine if  maintenance is required.     Maintenance Indicators     Based upon observations made during inspection, maintenance of the system may be required  based on the following indicators:      Missing or damaged internal components.    Obstructions in the trough, weir, filter basket or catch basin.    Excessive accumulation of trash, foliage and sediment in the filter basket and/or trough and  weir sections. Maintenance is required when the basket is greater than half‐full.    The following chart shows the 50% and 100% storage capacity of each filter height:    Model Filter Basket  Diameter (in) Filter Basket  Height (in) 50% Storage  Capacity (cu ft) 100% Storage  Capacity (cu ft) BC‐CURB‐30 18 30 2.21 4.42 BC‐CURB‐24 18 24 1.77 3.53 BC‐CURB‐18 18 18 1.33 2.65 BC‐CURB‐12 18 12 0.88 1.77   Maintenance Equipment    It is recommended that a vacuum truck be utilized to minimize the time required to maintain the  Curb Inlet Filter though it can easily cleaned by hand:      Bio Clean Environmental Maintenance Form (contained in O&M Manual).    Manhole hook or appropriate tools to access hatches and covers.   Appropriate safety signage and procedures.   Protective clothing and eye protection.    Note: entering a confined space requires appropriate safety and certification. It is generally  not required for routine maintenance of the system. Small or large vacuum truck (with  pressure washer attachment preferred).    Maintenance Procedures    It is recommended that maintenance occurs at least two days after the most recent rain event to  allow debris and sediments to dry out. Maintaining the system while flows are still entering it will  increase the time and complexity required for maintenance. Cleaning of the Curb Inlet Filter can be  performed from finish surface without entry into catch basin utilizing a vacuum truck. Some unique  4 | Page  and custom configurations may create conditions which would require entry for some or all of the  maintenance procedures. Once all safety measures have been set up cleaning of the Curb Inlet  Filter can proceed as followed:      Remove all manhole cover or access hatches (traffic control and safety measures to be  completed prior).    Using an extension on a vacuum truck position the hose over the opened manhole or hatch  opening. Insert the vacuum hose down into the filter basket and suck out trash, foliage and  sediment. A pressure wash is recommended and will assist in spraying of any debris stuck on  the side or bottom of the filter basket. If the filter basket is full, trash, sediment, and debris  will accumulate inside the trough and weir sections of the system. Once the filter basket is  clean power wash the weir and trough pushing these debris into the filter basket (leave the  hose in the filter basket during this process so entering debris will be sucked out). Power  wash off the trough, weir, debris screen, and filter basket sides and bottom.    Next remove the hydrocarbon boom that is attached to the inside of the filter basket. The  hydrocarbon boom is fastened to rails on two opposite sides of the basket (vertical rails).  Assess the color and condition of the boom using the following information in the next  bullet point. If replacement is required install and fasten on a new hydrocarbon boom.  Booms can be ordered directly from the manufacturer.    Follow is a replacement indication color chart for the hydrocarbon booms:                  The last step is to close up and replace the manhole or hatch and remove all traffic control.    All removed debris and pollutants shall be disposed of following local and state  requirements.   Disposal requirements for recovered pollutants may vary depending on local guidelines. In  most areas the sediment, once dewatered, can be disposed of in a sanitary landfill. It is not  anticipated that the sediment would be classified as hazardous waste.    In the case of damaged components, replacement parts can be ordered from the  manufacturer. Hydrocarbon booms can also be ordered directly from the manufacturer as  previously noted.         Excellent  Condition         Good   Condition         Minimal  Capacity         Replacement Required         5 | Page  Maintenance Sequence  Insert the vacuum hose down into the filter basket and suck out  debris. Use a pressure washer to assist in vacuum removal. Pressure wash off the weir and trough and vacuum out any  remaining debris.   Remove manhole cover and set up vacuum truck to clean the filter basket. Ensure all  traffic control and safety measures are in place.   6 | Page  For Maintenance Services or Information Please Contact Us At:  760‐433‐7640   Or Email: info@biocleanenvironmental.com  Remove the hydrocarbon boom  that is attached to the inside of the  filter basket. The hydrocarbon  boom is fastened to rails on two  opposite sides of the basket  (vertical rails). Assess the color and  condition of the boom using the  following information in the next  bullet point. If replacement is  required install and fasten on a  new hydrocarbon boom.   Close up and replace the  manhole or hatch and  remove all traffic control.  All removed debris and  pollutants shall be  disposed of following local  and state requirements.  For Office Use Only (city) (Zip Code)(Reviewed By) Owner / Management Company (Date) Contact Phone ( )_ Inspector Name Date / / Time AM / PM Weather Condition Additional Notes Site Map # Long: Storm Event in Last 72-hours? No Yes GPS Coordinates of Insert Catch Basin Size Evidence of Illicit Discharge? Trash Accumulation Type of Inspection Routine Follow Up Complaint Storm Lat: Long: Lat: Long: Sediment Accumulation Office personnel to complete section to the left. Functioning Properly or Maintenance Needed? 398 Via El Centro, Oceanside, CA 92058 P. 760.433.7640 F. 760.433.3176 Comments: Foliage Accumulation Long: Lat: Long: Lat: 3 Lat: 2 1 Long: Inspection and Maintenance Report Catch Basin Only Signs of Structural Damage? 5 4 6 Lat: Lat: Lat: Long: 7 Lat: Long: 10 8 Long: Project Name Project Address 12 Lat: 11 Lat: Long: Long: OPERATION & MAINTENANCE Bio Clean Environmental Services, Inc. 398 Via El Centro Oceanside, CA 92058 www.BioCleanEnvironmental.com p: 760.433.7640 f: 760.433.3176 Grate Inlet Filter 1 | Page  OPERATION & MAINTENANCE   The Bio Clean Grate Inlet Filter is a stormwater device designed to remove high levels of trash,  debris, sediments and hydrocarbons.  The filter is available in several configurations including trash  full capture, multi‐level screening, Kraken membrane filter and media filter variations. This manual  covers maintenance procedures of the trash full capture and multi‐level screening configurations. A  supplemental manual is available for the Kraken and media filter variations. This filter is made of  100% stainless steel and is available and various sizes and depths allowing it to fit in any grated  catch basin inlet. The filters heavy duty construction allows for cleaning with any vacuum truck. The  filet can also easily be cleaned by hand.     As with all stormwater BMPs, inspection and maintenance on the Grate Inlet Filter is necessary.  Stormwater regulations require BMPs be inspected and maintained to ensure they are operating as  designed to allow for effective pollutant removal and provide protection to receiving water bodies.  It is recommended that inspections be performed multiple times during the first year to assess site‐ specific loading conditions. This is recommended because pollutant loading can vary greatly from  site to site. Variables such as nearby soil erosion or construction sites, winter sanding of roads,  amount of daily traffic and land use can increase pollutant loading on the system. The first year of  inspections can be used to set inspection and maintenance intervals for subsequent years. Without  appropriate maintenance a BMP can exceed its storage capacity which can negatively affect its  continued performance in removing and retaining captured pollutants.                                              System Diagram:  2 | Page  Inspection Equipment    Following is a list of equipment to allow for simple and effective inspection of the Grate Inlet Filter:     Bio Clean Environmental Inspection Form (contained within this manual).    Manhole hook or appropriate tools to remove access hatches and covers.   Appropriate traffic control signage and procedures.   Protective clothing and eye protection.    Note: entering a confined space requires appropriate safety and certification. It is generally  not required for routine inspections or maintenance of the system.             Inspection Steps   The core to any successful stormwater BMP maintenance program is routine inspections. The  inspection steps required on the Grate Inlet Filter are quick and easy. As mentioned above the first  year should be seen as the maintenance interval establishment phase. During the first year more  frequent inspections should occur in order to gather loading data and maintenance requirements  for that specific site. This information can be used to establish a base for long‐term inspection and  maintenance interval requirements.     The Grate Inlet Filter can be inspected though visual observation. All necessary pre‐inspection steps  must be carried out before inspection occurs, such as safety measures to protect the inspector and  nearby pedestrians from any dangers associated with an open grated inlet. Once the grate has been  safely removed the inspection process can proceed:     Prepare the inspection form by writing in the necessary information including project name,  location, date & time, unit number and other info (see inspection form).    Observe the filter with the grate removed.    Look for any out of the ordinary obstructions on the grate or in the filter and its bypass.  Write down any observations on the inspection form.    Through observation and/or digital photographs estimate the amount of trash, foliage and  sediment accumulated inside the filter basket. Record this information on the inspection  form.    Observe the condition and color of the hydrocarbon boom. Record this information on the  inspection form.    Finalize inspection report for analysis by the maintenance manager to determine if  maintenance is required.     3 | Page  Maintenance Indicators     Based upon observations made during inspection, maintenance of the system may be required  based on the following indicators:      Missing or damaged internal components.    Obstructions in the filter basket and its bypass.   Excessive accumulation of trash, foliage and sediment in the filter basket. Maintenance is  required when the basket is greater than half‐full.    The following chart shows the 50% and 100% storage capacity of each filter height:    Model Filter Basket  Diameter (in) Filter Basket  Height (in) 50% Storage  Capacity (cu ft) 100% Storage  Capacity (cu ft) BC‐GRATE‐12‐12‐12 10.00 12.00 0.27 0.55 BC‐GRATE‐18‐18‐18 16.00 18.00 1.05 2.09 BC‐GRATE‐24‐24‐24 21.00 24.00 2.41 4.81 BC‐GRATE‐30‐30‐24 27.00 24.00 3.98 7.95 BC‐GRATE‐36‐36‐24 33.00 24.00 5.94 11.88 BC‐GRATE‐48‐48‐18 44.00 18.00 7.92 15.84   Maintenance Equipment    It is recommended that a vacuum truck be utilized to minimize the time required to maintain the  Curb Inlet Filter, though it can easily cleaned by hand:      Bio Clean Environmental Maintenance Form (contained in O&M Manual).    Manhole hook or appropriate tools to remove the grate.   Appropriate safety signage and procedures.   Protective clothing and eye protection.    Note: entering a confined space requires appropriate safety and certification. It is generally  not required for routine maintenance of the system. Small or large vacuum truck (with  pressure washer attachment preferred).    Maintenance Procedures    It is recommended that maintenance occurs at least two days after the most recent rain event to  allow debris and sediments to dry out. Maintaining the system while flows are still entering it will  increase the time and complexity required for maintenance. Cleaning of the Grate Inlet Filter can be  performed utilizing a vacuum truck. Once all safety measures have been set up cleaning of the  Grate Inlet Filter can proceed as followed:   4 | Page     Remove grate (traffic control and safety measures to be completed prior).    Using an extension on a vacuum truck position the hose over the opened catch basin. Insert  the vacuum hose down into the filter basket and suck out trash, foliage and sediment. A  pressure wash is recommended and will assist in spraying of any debris stuck on the side or  bottom of the filter basket. Power wash off the filter basket sides and bottom.    Next remove the hydrocarbon boom that is attached to the inside of the filter basket. The  hydrocarbon boom is fastened to rails on two opposite sides of the basket (vertical rails).  Assess the color and condition of the boom using the following information in the next  bullet point. If replacement is required install and fasten on a new hydrocarbon boom.  Booms can be ordered directly from the manufacturer.    Follow is a replacement indication color chart for the hydrocarbon booms:                  The last step is to replace the grate and remove all traffic control.    All removed debris and pollutants shall be disposed of following local and state  requirements.   Disposal requirements for recovered pollutants may vary depending on local guidelines. In  most areas the sediment, once dewatered, can be disposed of in a sanitary landfill. It is not  anticipated that the sediment would be classified as hazardous waste.    In the case of damaged components, replacement parts can be ordered from the  manufacturer. Hydrocarbon booms can also be ordered directly from the manufacturer as  previously noted.                         Excellent  Condition         Good  Condition         Minimal  Capacity         Replacement Required         5 | Page    Maintenance Sequence  Insert the vacuum hose down into the filter basket and suck out debris. Use a pressure washer to assist in vacuum removal.  Pressure wash off screens.   Remove grate and set up vacuum truck to clean the filter basket.   6 | Page  For Maintenance Services or  Information Please Contact Us At:  760‐433‐7640   Or Email:  info@biocleanenvironmental.com Remove the hydrocarbon boom  that is attached to the inside of the  filter basket. The hydrocarbon  boom is fastened to rails on two  opposite sides of the basket  (vertical rails). Assess the color and  condition of the boom using the  following information in the next  bullet point. If replacement is  required install and fasten on a  new hydrocarbon boom.   Close up and replace the  grate and remove all traffic  control. All removed debris  and pollutants shall be  disposed of following local  and state requirements.  For Office Use Only (city) (Zip Code)(Reviewed By) Owner / Management Company (Date) Contact Phone ( )_ Inspector Name Date / / Time AM / PM Weather Condition Additional Notes Site Map # Long: Storm Event in Last 72-hours? No Yes GPS Coordinates of Insert Catch Basin Size Evidence of Illicit Discharge? Trash Accumulation Type of Inspection Routine Follow Up Complaint Storm Lat: Long: Lat: Long: Sediment Accumulation Office personnel to complete section to the left. Functioning Properly or Maintenance Needed? 398 Via El Centro, Oceanside, CA 92058 P. 760.433.7640 F. 760.433.3176 Comments: Foliage Accumulation Long: Lat: Long: Lat: 3 Lat: 2 1 Long: Inspection and Maintenance Report Catch Basin Only Signs of Structural Damage? 5 4 6 Lat: Lat: Lat: Long: 7 Lat: Long: 10 8 Long: Project Name Project Address 12 Lat: 11 Lat: Long: Long: Infiltration Basin TC-11 January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 1 of 8 New Development and Redevelopment www.cabmphandbooks.com Description An infiltration basin is a shallow impoundment that is designed to infiltrate stormwater. Infiltration basins use the natural filtering ability of the soil to remove pollutants in stormwater runoff. Infiltration facilities store runoff until it gradually exfiltrates through the soil and eventually into the water table. This practice has high pollutant removal efficiency and can also help recharge groundwater, thus helping to maintain low flows in stream systems. Infiltration basins can be challenging to apply on many sites, however, because of soils requirements. In addition, some studies have shown relatively high failure rates compared with other management practices. California Experience Infiltration basins have a long history of use in California, especially in the Central Valley. Basins located in Fresno were among those initially evaluated in the National Urban Runoff Program and were found to be effective at reducing the volume of runoff, while posing little long-term threat to groundwater quality (EPA, 1983; Schroeder, 1995). Proper siting of these devices is crucial as underscored by the experience of Caltrans in siting two basins in Southern California. The basin with marginal separation from groundwater and soil permeability failed immediately and could never be rehabilitated. Advantages „ Provides 100% reduction in the load discharged to surface waters. „ The principal benefit of infiltration basins is the approximation of pre-development hydrology during which a Design Considerations „ Soil for Infiltration „ Slope „ Aesthetics Targeted Constituents ; Sediment „ ; Nutrients „ ; Trash „ ; Metals „ ; Bacteria „ ; Oil and Grease „ ; Organics „ Legend (Removal Effectiveness) z Low „ High ▲ Medium TC-11 Infiltration Basin 2 of 8 California Stormwater BMP Handbook January 2003 New Development and Redevelopment www.cabmphandbooks.com significant portion of the average annual rainfall runoff is infiltrated and evaporated rather than flushed directly to creeks. „ If the water quality volume is adequately sized, infiltration basins can be useful for providing control of channel forming (erosion) and high frequency (generally less than the 2-year) flood events. Limitations „ May not be appropriate for industrial sites or locations where spills may occur. „ Infiltration basins require a minimum soil infiltration rate of 0.5 inches/hour, not appropriate at sites with Hydrologic Soil Types C and D. „ If infiltration rates exceed 2.4 inches/hour, then the runoff should be fully treated prior to infiltration to protect groundwater quality. „ Not suitable on fill sites or steep slopes. „ Risk of groundwater contamination in very coarse soils. „ Upstream drainage area must be completely stabilized before construction. „ Difficult to restore functioning of infiltration basins once clogged. Design and Sizing Guidelines „ Water quality volume determined by local requirements or sized so that 85% of the annual runoff volume is captured. „ Basin sized so that the entire water quality volume is infiltrated within 48 hours. „ Vegetation establishment on the basin floor may help reduce the clogging rate. Construction/Inspection Considerations „ Before construction begins, stabilize the entire area draining to the facility. If impossible, place a diversion berm around the perimeter of the infiltration site to prevent sediment entrance during construction or remove the top 2 inches of soil after the site is stabililized. Stabilize the entire contributing drainage area, including the side slopes, before allowing any runoff to enter once construction is complete. „ Place excavated material such that it can not be washed back into the basin if a storm occurs during construction of the facility. „ Build the basin without driving heavy equipment over the infiltration surface. Any equipment driven on the surface should have extra-wide (“low pressure”) tires. Prior to any construction, rope off the infiltration area to stop entrance by unwanted equipment. „ After final grading, till the infiltration surface deeply. „ Use appropriate erosion control seed mix for the specific project and location. Infiltration Basin TC-11 January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 3 of 8 New Development and Redevelopment www.cabmphandbooks.com Performance As water migrates through porous soil and rock, pollutant attenuation mechanisms include precipitation, sorption, physical filtration, and bacterial degradation. If functioning properly, this approach is presumed to have high removal efficiencies for particulate pollutants and moderate removal of soluble pollutants. Actual pollutant removal in the subsurface would be expected to vary depending upon site-specific soil types. This technology eliminates discharge to surface waters except for the very largest storms; consequently, complete removal of all stormwater constituents can be assumed. There remain some concerns about the potential for groundwater contamination despite the findings of the NURP and Nightingale (1975; 1987a,b,c; 1989). For instance, a report by Pitt et al. (1994) highlighted the potential for groundwater contamination from intentional and unintentional stormwater infiltration. That report recommends that infiltration facilities not be sited in areas where high concentrations are present or where there is a potential for spills of toxic material. Conversely, Schroeder (1995) reported that there was no evidence of groundwater impacts from an infiltration basin serving a large industrial catchment in Fresno, CA. Siting Criteria The key element in siting infiltration basins is identifying sites with appropriate soil and hydrogeologic properties, which is critical for long term performance. In one study conducted in Prince George's County, Maryland (Galli, 1992), all of the infiltration basins investigated clogged within 2 years. It is believed that these failures were for the most part due to allowing infiltration at sites with rates of less than 0.5 in/hr, basing siting on soil type rather than field infiltration tests, and poor construction practices that resulted in soil compaction of the basin invert. A study of 23 infiltration basins in the Pacific Northwest showed better long-term performance in an area with highly permeable soils (Hilding, 1996). In this study, few of the infiltration basins had failed after 10 years. Consequently, the following guidelines for identifying appropriate soil and subsurface conditions should be rigorously adhered to. „ Determine soil type (consider RCS soil type ‘A, B or C’ only) from mapping and consult USDA soil survey tables to review other parameters such as the amount of silt and clay, presence of a restrictive layer or seasonal high water table, and estimated permeability. The soil should not have more than 30% clay or more than 40% of clay and silt combined. Eliminate sites that are clearly unsuitable for infiltration. „ Groundwater separation should be at least 3 m from the basin invert to the measured ground water elevation. There is concern at the state and regional levels of the impact on groundwater quality from infiltrated runoff, especially when the separation between groundwater and the surface is small. „ Location away from buildings, slopes and highway pavement (greater than 6 m) and wells and bridge structures (greater than 30 m). Sites constructed of fill, having a base flow or with a slope greater than 15% should not be considered. „ Ensure that adequate head is available to operate flow splitter structures (to allow the basin to be offline) without ponding in the splitter structure or creating backwater upstream of the splitter. TC-11 Infiltration Basin 4 of 8 California Stormwater BMP Handbook January 2003 New Development and Redevelopment www.cabmphandbooks.com „ Base flow should not be present in the tributary watershed. Secondary Screening Based on Site Geotechnical Investigation „ At least three in-hole conductivity tests shall be performed using USBR 7300-89 or Bouwer- Rice procedures (the latter if groundwater is encountered within the boring), two tests at different locations within the proposed basin and the third down gradient by no more than approximately 10 m. The tests shall measure permeability in the side slopes and the bed within a depth of 3 m of the invert. „ The minimum acceptable hydraulic conductivity as measured in any of the three required test holes is 13 mm/hr. If any test hole shows less than the minimum value, the site should be disqualified from further consideration. „ Exclude from consideration sites constructed in fill or partially in fill unless no silts or clays are present in the soil boring. Fill tends to be compacted, with clays in a dispersed rather than flocculated state, greatly reducing permeability. „ The geotechnical investigation should be such that a good understanding is gained as to how the stormwater runoff will move in the soil (horizontally or vertically) and if there are any geological conditions that could inhibit the movement of water. Additional Design Guidelines (1) Basin Sizing - The required water quality volume is determined by local regulations or sufficient to capture 85% of the annual runoff. (2) Provide pretreatment if sediment loading is a maintenance concern for the basin. (3) Include energy dissipation in the inlet design for the basins. Avoid designs that include a permanent pool to reduce opportunity for standing water and associated vector problems. (4) Basin invert area should be determined by the equation: where A = Basin invert area (m2) WQV = water quality volume (m3) k = 0.5 times the lowest field-measured hydraulic conductivity (m/hr) t = drawdown time ( 48 hr) (5) The use of vertical piping, either for distribution or infiltration enhancement shall not be allowed to avoid device classification as a Class V injection well per 40 CFR146.5(e)(4). kt WQVA= Infiltration Basin TC-11 January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 5 of 8 New Development and Redevelopment www.cabmphandbooks.com Maintenance Regular maintenance is critical to the successful operation of infiltration basins. Recommended operation and maintenance guidelines include: „ Inspections and maintenance to ensure that water infiltrates into the subsurface completely (recommended infiltration rate of 72 hours or less) and that vegetation is carefully managed to prevent creating mosquito and other vector habitats. „ Observe drain time for the design storm after completion or modification of the facility to confirm that the desired drain time has been obtained. „ Schedule semiannual inspections for beginning and end of the wet season to identify potential problems such as erosion of the basin side slopes and invert, standing water, trash and debris, and sediment accumulation. „ Remove accumulated trash and debris in the basin at the start and end of the wet season. „ Inspect for standing water at the end of the wet season. „ Trim vegetation at the beginning and end of the wet season to prevent establishment of woody vegetation and for aesthetic and vector reasons. „ Remove accumulated sediment and regrade when the accumulated sediment volume exceeds 10% of the basin. „ If erosion is occurring within the basin, revegetate immediately and stabilize with an erosion control mulch or mat until vegetation cover is established. „ To avoid reversing soil development, scarification or other disturbance should only be performed when there are actual signs of clogging, rather than on a routine basis. Always remove deposited sediments before scarification, and use a hand-guided rotary tiller, if possible, or a disc harrow pulled by a very light tractor. Cost Infiltration basins are relatively cost-effective practices because little infrastructure is needed when constructing them. One study estimated the total construction cost at about $2 per ft (adjusted for inflation) of storage for a 0.25-acre basin (SWRPC, 1991). As with other BMPs, these published cost estimates may deviate greatly from what might be incurred at a specific site. For instance, Caltrans spent about $18/ft3 for the two infiltration basins constructed in southern California, each of which had a water quality volume of about 0.34 ac.-ft. Much of the higher cost can be attributed to changes in the storm drain system necessary to route the runoff to the basin locations. Infiltration basins typically consume about 2 to 3% of the site draining to them, which is relatively small. Additional space may be required for buffer, landscaping, access road, and fencing. Maintenance costs are estimated at 5 to 10% of construction costs. One cost concern associated with infiltration practices is the maintenance burden and longevity. If improperly maintained, infiltration basins have a high failure rate. Thus, it may be necessary to replace the basin with a different technology after a relatively short period of time. TC-11 Infiltration Basin 6 of 8 California Stormwater BMP Handbook January 2003 New Development and Redevelopment www.cabmphandbooks.com References and Sources of Additional Information Caltrans, 2002, BMP Retrofit Pilot Program Proposed Final Report, Rpt. CTSW-RT-01-050, California Dept. of Transportation, Sacramento, CA. Galli, J. 1992. Analysis of Urban BMP Performance and Longevity in Prince George's County, Maryland. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, Washington, DC. Hilding, K. 1996. Longevity of infiltration basins assessed in Puget Sound. Watershed Protection Techniques 1(3):124–125. Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE). 2000. Maryland Stormwater Design Manual. http://www.mde.state.md.us/environment/wma/stormwatermanual. Accessed May 22, 2002. Metzger, M. E., D. F. Messer, C. L. Beitia, C. M. Myers, and V. L. Kramer. 2002. The Dark Side Of Stormwater Runoff Management: Disease Vectors Associated With Structural BMPs. Stormwater 3(2): 24-39. Nightingale, H.I., 1975, “Lead, Zinc, and Copper in Soils of Urban Storm-Runoff Retention Basins,” American Water Works Assoc. Journal. Vol. 67, p. 443-446. Nightingale, H.I., 1987a, “Water Quality beneath Urban Runoff Water Management Basins,” Water Resources Bulletin, Vol. 23, p. 197-205. Nightingale, H.I., 1987b, “Accumulation of As, Ni, Cu, and Pb in Retention and Recharge Basin Soils from Urban Runoff,” Water Resources Bulletin, Vol. 23, p. 663-672. Nightingale, H.I., 1987c, “Organic Pollutants in Soils of Retention/Recharge Basins Receiving Urban Runoff Water,” Soil Science Vol. 148, pp. 39-45. Nightingale, H.I., Harrison, D., and Salo, J.E., 1985, “An Evaluation Technique for Ground- water Quality Beneath Urban Runoff Retention and Percolation Basins,” Ground Water Monitoring Review, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 43-50. Oberts, G. 1994. Performance of Stormwater Ponds and Wetlands in Winter. Watershed Protection Techniques 1(2): 64–68. Pitt, R., et al. 1994, Potential Groundwater Contamination from Intentional and Nonintentional Stormwater Infiltration, EPA/600/R-94/051, Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory, U.S. EPA, Cincinnati, OH. Schueler, T. 1987. Controlling Urban Runoff: A Practical Manual for Planning and Designing Urban BMPs. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, Washington, DC. Schroeder, R.A., 1995, Potential For Chemical Transport Beneath a Storm-Runoff Recharge (Retention) Basin for an Industrial Catchment in Fresno, CA, USGS Water-Resource Investigations Report 93-4140. Infiltration Basin TC-11 January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 7 of 8 New Development and Redevelopment www.cabmphandbooks.com Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission (SWRPC). 1991. Costs of Urban Nonpoint Source Water Pollution Control Measures. Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission, Waukesha, WI. U.S. EPA, 1983, Results of the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program: Volume 1 – Final Report, WH-554, Water Planning Division, Washington, DC. Watershed Management Institute (WMI). 1997. Operation, Maintenance, and Management of Stormwater Management Systems. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Washington, DC. Information Resources Center for Watershed Protection (CWP). 1997. Stormwater BMP Design Supplement for Cold Climates. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds. Washington, DC. Ferguson, B.K., 1994. Stormwater Infiltration. CRC Press, Ann Arbor, MI. USEPA. 1993. Guidance to Specify Management Measures for Sources of Nonpoint Pollution in Coastal Waters. EPA-840-B-92-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC. TC-11 Infiltration Basin 8 of 8 California Stormwater BMP Handbook January 2003 New Development and Redevelopment www.cabmphandbooks.com Non-Stormwater Discharges SC-10 Description Art Credit: Margie Winter Objectives „ Cover „ Contain „ Educate „ Reduce/Minimize „ Product Substitution Targeted Constituents Sediment Nutrients  Trash Metals  Bacteria  Oil and Grease  Organics  Non-stormwater discharges are those flows that do not consist entirely of stormwater. Some non-stormwater discharges do not include pollutants and may be discharged to the storm drain. These include uncontaminated groundwater and natural springs. There are also some non-stormwater discharges that typically do not contain pollutants and may be discharged to the storm drain with conditions. These include car washing, air conditioner condensate, etc. However there are certain non-stormwater discharges that pose environmental concern. These discharges may originate from illegal dumping or from internal floor drains, appliances, industrial processes, sinks, and toilets that are connected to the nearby storm drainage system. These discharges (which may include: process waste waters, cooling waters, wash waters, and sanitary wastewater) can carry substances such as paint, oil, fuel and other automotive fluids, chemicals and other pollutants into storm drains. They can generally be detected through a combination of detection and elimination. The ultimate goal is to effectively eliminate non- stormwater discharges to the stormwater drainage system through implementation of measures to detect, correct, and enforce against illicit connections and illegal discharges of pollutants on streets and into the storm drain system and creeks. Approach Initially the industry must make an assessment of non- stormwater discharges to determine which types must be eliminated or addressed through BMPs. The focus of the following approach is in the elimination of non-stormwater discharges. January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 1 of 6 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com SC-10 Non-Stormwater Discharges Pollution Prevention „ Ensure that used oil, used antifreeze, and hazardous chemical recycling programs are being implemented. Encourage litter control. Suggested Protocols Recommended Complaint Investigation Equipment „ Field Screening Analysis - pH paper or meter - Commercial stormwater pollutant screening kit that can detect for reactive phosphorus, nitrate nitrogen, ammonium nitrogen, specific conductance, and turbidity - Sample jars - Sample collection pole - A tool to remove access hole covers „ Laboratory Analysis - Sample cooler - Ice - Sample jars and labels - Chain of custody forms „ Documentation - Camera - Notebook - Pens - Notice of Violation forms - Educational materials General „ Develop clear protocols and lines of communication for effectively prohibiting non- stormwater discharges, especially those that are not classified as hazardous. These are often not responded to as effectively as they need to be. „ Stencil or demarcate storm drains, where applicable, to prevent illegal disposal of pollutants. Storm drain inlets should have messages such as “Dump No Waste Drains to Stream” stenciled or demarcated next to them to warn against ignorant or intentional dumping of pollutants into the storm drainage system. 2 of 6 California Stormwater BMP Handbook January 2003 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com Non-Stormwater Discharges SC-10 „ See SC44 Stormwater Drainage System Maintenance for additional information. Illicit Connections „ Locate discharges from the industrial storm drainage system to the municipal storm drain system through review of “as-built” piping schematics. „ Isolate problem areas and plug illicit discharge points. „ Locate and evaluate all discharges to the industrial storm drain system. Visual Inspection and Inventory „ Inventory and inspect each discharge point during dry weather. „ Keep in mind that drainage from a storm event can continue for a day or two following the end of a storm and groundwater may infiltrate the underground stormwater collection system. Also, non-stormwater discharges are often intermittent and may require periodic inspections. Review Infield Piping „ A review of the “as-built” piping schematic is a way to determine if there are any connections to the stormwater collection system. „ Inspect the path of floor drains in older buildings. Smoke Testing „ Smoke testing of wastewater and stormwater collection systems is used to detect connections between the two systems. „ During dry weather the stormwater collection system is filled with smoke and then traced to sources. The appearance of smoke at the base of a toilet indicates that there may be a connection between the sanitary and the stormwater system. Dye Testing „ A dye test can be performed by simply releasing a dye into either your sanitary or process wastewater system and examining the discharge points from the stormwater collection system for discoloration. TV Inspection of Drainage System „ TV Cameras can be employed to visually identify illicit connections to the industrial storm drainage system. Illegal Dumping „ Regularly inspect and clean up hot spots and other storm drainage areas where illegal dumping and disposal occurs. „ On paved surfaces, clean up spills with as little water as possible. Use a rag for small spills, a damp mop for general cleanup, and absorbent material for larger spills. If the spilled material is hazardous, then the used cleanup materials are also hazardous and must be sent to a certified laundry (rags) or disposed of as hazardous waste. January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 3 of 6 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com SC-10 Non-Stormwater Discharges „ Never hose down or bury dry material spills. Sweep up the material and dispose of properly. „ Use adsorbent materials on small spills rather than hosing down the spill. Remove the adsorbent materials promptly and dispose of properly. „ For larger spills, a private spill cleanup company or Hazmat team may be necessary. Once a site has been cleaned: „ Post “No Dumping” signs with a phone number for reporting dumping and disposal. „ Landscaping and beautification efforts of hot spots may also discourage future dumping, as well as provide open space and increase property values. „ Lighting or barriers may also be needed to discourage future dumping. „ See fact sheet SC11 Spill Prevention, Control, and Cleanup. Inspection „ Regularly inspect and clean up hot spots and other storm drainage areas where illegal dumping and disposal occurs. „ Conduct field investigations of the industrial storm drain system for potential sources of non-stormwater discharges. „ Pro-actively conduct investigations of high priority areas. Based on historical data, prioritize specific geographic areas and/or incident type for pro-active investigations. Reporting „ A database is useful for defining and tracking the magnitude and location of the problem. „ Report prohibited non-stormwater discharges observed during the course of normal daily activities so they can be investigated, contained, and cleaned up or eliminated. „ Document that non-stormwater discharges have been eliminated by recording tests performed, methods used, dates of testing, and any on-site drainage points observed. „ Document and report annually the results of the program. „ Maintain documentation of illicit connection and illegal dumping incidents, including significant conditionally exempt discharges that are not properly managed. Training „ Training of technical staff in identifying and documenting illegal dumping incidents is required. „ Consider posting the quick reference table near storm drains to reinforce training. „ Train employees to identify non-stormwater discharges and report discharges to the appropriate departments. 4 of 6 California Stormwater BMP Handbook January 2003 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com Non-Stormwater Discharges SC-10 „ Educate employees about spill prevention and cleanup. „ Well-trained employees can reduce human errors that lead to accidental releases or spills. The employee should have the tools and knowledge to immediately begin cleaning up a spill should one occur. Employees should be familiar with the Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan. „ Determine and implement appropriate outreach efforts to reduce non-permissible non- stormwater discharges. „ Conduct spill response drills annually (if no events occurred to evaluate your plan) in cooperation with other industries. „ When a responsible party is identified, educate the party on the impacts of his or her actions. Spill Response and Prevention „ See SC11 Spill Prevention Control and Cleanup. Other Considerations „ Many facilities do not have accurate, up-to-date schematic drawings. Requirements Costs (including capital and operation & maintenance) „ The primary cost is for staff time and depends on how aggressively a program is implemented. „ Cost for containment and disposal is borne by the discharger. „ Illicit connections can be difficult to locate especially if there is groundwater infiltration. „ Indoor floor drains may require re-plumbing if cross-connections to storm drains are detected. Maintenance (including administrative and staffing) „ Illegal dumping and illicit connection violations requires technical staff to detect and investigate them. Supplemental Information Further Detail of the BMP Illegal Dumping „ Substances illegally dumped on streets and into the storm drain systems and creeks include paints, used oil and other automotive fluids, construction debris, chemicals, fresh concrete, leaves, grass clippings, and pet wastes. All of these wastes cause stormwater and receiving water quality problems as well as clog the storm drain system itself. „ Establish a system for tracking incidents. The system should be designed to identify the following: - Illegal dumping hot spots January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 5 of 6 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com SC-10 Non-Stormwater Discharges 6 of 6 California Stormwater BMP Handbook January 2003 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com - Types and quantities (in some cases) of wastes - Patterns in time of occurrence (time of day/night, month, or year) - Mode of dumping (abandoned containers, “midnight dumping” from moving vehicles, direct dumping of materials, accidents/spills) - Responsible parties One of the keys to success of reducing or eliminating illegal dumping is increasing the number of people at the facility who are aware of the problem and who have the tools to at least identify the incident, if not correct it. Therefore, train field staff to recognize and report the incidents. What constitutes a “non-stormwater” discharge? „ Non-stormwater discharges to the stormwater collection system may include any water used directly in the manufacturing process (process wastewater), air conditioning condensate and coolant, non-contact cooling water, cooling equipment condensate, outdoor secondary containment water, vehicle and equipment wash water, sink and drinking fountain wastewater, sanitary wastes, or other wastewaters. Permit Requirements „ Facilities subject to stormwater permit requirements must include a certification that the stormwater collection system has been tested or evaluated for the presence of non- stormwater discharges. The State’s General Industrial Stormwater Permit requires that non- stormwater discharges be eliminated prior to implementation of the facility’s SWPPP. Performance Evaluation „ Review annually internal investigation results; assess whether goals were met and what changes or improvements are necessary. „ Obtain feedback from personnel assigned to respond to, or inspect for, illicit connections and illegal dumping incidents. References and Resources California’s Nonpoint Source Program Plan http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/nps/index.html Clark County Storm Water Pollution Control Manual http://www.co.clark.wa.us/pubworks/bmpman.pdf King County Storm Water Pollution Control Manual http://dnr.metrokc.gov/wlr/dss/spcm.htm Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program http://www.scvurppp.org The Storm Water Managers Resource Center http://www.stormwatercenter.net/ Spill Prevention, Control & Cleanup SC-11 Photo Credit: Geoff Brosseau Objectives „ Cover „ Contain „ Educate „ Reduce/Minimize „ Product Substitution Targeted Constituents Sediment Nutrients Trash Metals  Bacteria Oil and Grease  Organics  Description Many activities that occur at an industrial or commercial site have the potential to cause accidental or illegal spills. Preparation for accidental or illegal spills, with proper training and reporting systems implemented, can minimize the discharge of pollutants to the environment. Spills and leaks are one of the largest contributors of stormwater pollutants. Spill prevention and control plans are applicable to any site at which hazardous materials are stored or used. An effective plan should have spill prevention and response procedures that identify potential spill areas, specify material handling procedures, describe spill response procedures, and provide spill clean-up equipment. The plan should take steps to identify and characterize potential spills, eliminate and reduce spill potential, respond to spills when they occur in an effort to prevent pollutants from entering the stormwater drainage system, and train personnel to prevent and control future spills. Approach Pollution Prevention „ Develop procedures to prevent/mitigate spills to storm drain systems. Develop and standardize reporting procedures, containment, storage, and disposal activities, documentation, and follow-up procedures. „ Develop a Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan. The plan should include: January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 1 of 9 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com SC-11 Spill Prevention, Control & Cleanup - Description of the facility, owner and address, activities and chemicals present - Facility map - Notification and evacuation procedures - Cleanup instructions - Identification of responsible departments - Identify key spill response personnel „ Recycle, reclaim, or reuse materials whenever possible. This will reduce the amount of process materials that are brought into the facility. Suggested Protocols (including equipment needs) Spill Prevention „ Develop procedures to prevent/mitigate spills to storm drain systems. Develop and standardize reporting procedures, containment, storage, and disposal activities, documentation, and follow-up procedures. „ If consistent illegal dumping is observed at the facility: - Post “No Dumping” signs with a phone number for reporting illegal dumping and disposal. Signs should also indicate fines and penalties applicable for illegal dumping. - Landscaping and beautification efforts may also discourage illegal dumping. - Bright lighting and/or entrance barriers may also be needed to discourage illegal dumping. „ Store and contain liquid materials in such a manner that if the tank is ruptured, the contents will not discharge, flow, or be washed into the storm drainage system, surface waters, or groundwater. „ If the liquid is oil, gas, or other material that separates from and floats on water, install a spill control device (such as a tee section) in the catch basins that collects runoff from the storage tank area. „ Routine maintenance: - Place drip pans or absorbent materials beneath all mounted taps, and at all potential drip and spill locations during filling and unloading of tanks. Any collected liquids or soiled absorbent materials must be reused/recycled or properly disposed. - Store and maintain appropriate spill cleanup materials in a location known to all near the tank storage area; and ensure that employees are familiar with the site’s spill control plan and/or proper spill cleanup procedures. - Sweep and clean the storage area monthly if it is paved, do not hose down the area to a storm drain. 2 of 9 California Stormwater BMP Handbook January 2003 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com Spill Prevention, Control & Cleanup SC-11 - Check tanks (and any containment sumps) daily for leaks and spills. Replace tanks that are leaking, corroded, or otherwise deteriorating with tanks in good condition. Collect all spilled liquids and properly dispose of them. „ Label all containers according to their contents (e.g., solvent, gasoline). „ Label hazardous substances regarding the potential hazard (corrosive, radioactive, flammable, explosive, poisonous). „ Prominently display required labels on transported hazardous and toxic materials (per US DOT regulations). „ Identify key spill response personnel. Spill Control and Cleanup Activities „ Follow the Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan. „ Clean up leaks and spills immediately. „ Place a stockpile of spill cleanup materials where it will be readily accessible (e.g., near storage and maintenance areas). „ On paved surfaces, clean up spills with as little water as possible. Use a rag for small spills, a damp mop for general cleanup, and absorbent material for larger spills. If the spilled material is hazardous, then the used cleanup materials are also hazardous and must be sent to a certified laundry (rags) or disposed of as hazardous waste. Physical methods for the cleanup of dry chemicals include the use of brooms, shovels, sweepers, or plows. „ Never hose down or bury dry material spills. Sweep up the material and dispose of properly. „ Chemical cleanups of material can be achieved with the use of adsorbents, gels, and foams. Use adsorbent materials on small spills rather than hosing down the spill. Remove the adsorbent materials promptly and dispose of properly. „ For larger spills, a private spill cleanup company or Hazmat team may be necessary. Reporting „ Report spills that pose an immediate threat to human health or the environment to the Regional Water Quality Control Board. „ Federal regulations require that any oil spill into a water body or onto an adjoining shoreline be reported to the National Response Center (NRC) at 800-424-8802 (24 hour). „ Report spills to local agencies, such as the fire department; they can assist in cleanup. „ Establish a system for tracking incidents. The system should be designed to identify the following: - Types and quantities (in some cases) of wastes - Patterns in time of occurrence (time of day/night, month, or year) January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 3 of 9 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com SC-11 Spill Prevention, Control & Cleanup - Mode of dumping (abandoned containers, “midnight dumping” from moving vehicles, direct dumping of materials, accidents/spills) - Responsible parties Training „ Educate employees about spill prevention and cleanup. „ Well-trained employees can reduce human errors that lead to accidental releases or spills: - The employee should have the tools and knowledge to immediately begin cleaning up a spill should one occur. - Employees should be familiar with the Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan. „ Employees should be educated about aboveground storage tank requirements. Employees responsible for aboveground storage tanks and liquid transfers should be thoroughly familiar with the Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan and the plan should be readily available. „ Train employees to recognize and report illegal dumping incidents. Other Considerations (Limitations and Regulations) „ State regulations exist for facilities with a storage capacity of 10,000 gallons or more of petroleum to prepare a Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan (Health & Safety Code Chapter 6.67). „ State regulations also exist for storage of hazardous materials (Health & Safety Code Chapter 6.95), including the preparation of area and business plans for emergency response to the releases or threatened releases. „ Consider requiring smaller secondary containment areas (less than 200 sq. ft.) to be connected to the sanitary sewer, prohibiting any hard connections to the storm drain. Requirements Costs (including capital and operation & maintenance) „ Will vary depending on the size of the facility and the necessary controls. „ Prevention of leaks and spills is inexpensive. Treatment and/or disposal of contaminated soil or water can be quite expensive. Maintenance (including administrative and staffing) „ This BMP has no major administrative or staffing requirements. However, extra time is needed to properly handle and dispose of spills, which results in increased labor costs. 4 of 9 California Stormwater BMP Handbook January 2003 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com Spill Prevention, Control & Cleanup SC-11 Supplemental Information Further Detail of the BMP Reporting Record keeping and internal reporting represent good operating practices because they can increase the efficiency of the facility and the effectiveness of BMPs. A good record keeping system helps the facility minimize incident recurrence, correctly respond with appropriate cleanup activities, and comply with legal requirements. A record keeping and reporting system should be set up for documenting spills, leaks, and other discharges, including discharges of hazardous substances in reportable quantities. Incident records describe the quality and quantity of non-stormwater discharges to the storm sewer. These records should contain the following information: „ Date and time of the incident „ Weather conditions „ Duration of the spill/leak/discharge „ Cause of the spill/leak/discharge „ Response procedures implemented „ Persons notified „ Environmental problems associated with the spill/leak/discharge Separate record keeping systems should be established to document housekeeping and preventive maintenance inspections, and training activities. All housekeeping and preventive maintenance inspections should be documented. Inspection documentation should contain the following information: „ The date and time the inspection was performed „ Name of the inspector „ Items inspected „ Problems noted „ Corrective action required „ Date corrective action was taken Other means to document and record inspection results are field notes, timed and dated photographs, videotapes, and drawings and maps. Aboveground Tank Leak and Spill Control Accidental releases of materials from aboveground liquid storage tanks present the potential for contaminating stormwater with many different pollutants. Materials spilled, leaked, or lost from January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 5 of 9 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com SC-11 Spill Prevention, Control & Cleanup tanks may accumulate in soils or on impervious surfaces and be carried away by stormwater runoff. The most common causes of unintentional releases are: „ Installation problems „ Failure of piping systems (pipes, pumps, flanges, couplings, hoses, and valves) „ External corrosion and structural failure „ Spills and overfills due to operator error „ Leaks during pumping of liquids or gases from truck or rail car to a storage tank or vice versa Storage of reactive, ignitable, or flammable liquids should comply with the Uniform Fire Code and the National Electric Code. Practices listed below should be employed to enhance the code requirements: „ Tanks should be placed in a designated area. „ Tanks located in areas where firearms are discharged should be encapsulated in concrete or the equivalent. „ Designated areas should be impervious and paved with Portland cement concrete, free of cracks and gaps, in order to contain leaks and spills. „ Liquid materials should be stored in UL approved double walled tanks or surrounded by a curb or dike to provide the volume to contain 10 percent of the volume of all of the containers or 110 percent of the volume of the largest container, whichever is greater. The area inside the curb should slope to a drain. „ For used oil or dangerous waste, a dead-end sump should be installed in the drain. „ All other liquids should be drained to the sanitary sewer if available. The drain must have a positive control such as a lock, valve, or plug to prevent release of contaminated liquids. „ Accumulated stormwater in petroleum storage areas should be passed through an oil/water separator. Maintenance is critical to preventing leaks and spills. Conduct routine inspections and: „ Check for external corrosion and structural failure. „ Check for spills and overfills due to operator error. „ Check for failure of piping system (pipes, pumps, flanger, coupling, hoses, and valves). „ Check for leaks or spills during pumping of liquids or gases from truck or rail car to a storage facility or vice versa. 6 of 9 California Stormwater BMP Handbook January 2003 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com Spill Prevention, Control & Cleanup SC-11 „ Visually inspect new tank or container installation for loose fittings, poor welding, and improper or poorly fitted gaskets. „ Inspect tank foundations, connections, coatings, and tank walls and piping system. Look for corrosion, leaks, cracks, scratches, and other physical damage that may weaken the tank or container system. „ Frequently relocate accumulated stormwater during the wet season. „ Periodically conduct integrity testing by a qualified professional. Vehicle Leak and Spill Control Major spills on roadways and other public areas are generally handled by highly trained Hazmat teams from local fire departments or environmental health departments. The measures listed below pertain to leaks and smaller spills at vehicle maintenance shops. In addition to implementing the spill prevention, control, and clean up practices above, use the following measures related to specific activities: Vehicle and Equipment Maintenance „ Perform all vehicle fluid removal or changing inside or under cover to prevent the run-on of stormwater and the runoff of spills. „ Regularly inspect vehicles and equipment for leaks, and repair immediately. „ Check incoming vehicles and equipment (including delivery trucks, and employee and subcontractor vehicles) for leaking oil and fluids. Do not allow leaking vehicles or equipment onsite. „ Always use secondary containment, such as a drain pan or drop cloth, to catch spills or leaks when removing or changing fluids. „ Immediately drain all fluids from wrecked vehicles. „ Store wrecked vehicles or damaged equipment under cover. „ Place drip pans or absorbent materials under heavy equipment when not in use. „ Use adsorbent materials on small spills rather than hosing down the spill. „ Remove the adsorbent materials promptly and dispose of properly. „ Promptly transfer used fluids to the proper waste or recycling drums. Don’t leave full drip pans or other open containers lying around. „ Oil filters disposed of in trashcans or dumpsters can leak oil and contaminate stormwater. Place the oil filter in a funnel over a waste oil recycling drum to drain excess oil before disposal. Oil filters can also be recycled. Ask your oil supplier or recycler about recycling oil filters. January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 7 of 9 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com SC-11 Spill Prevention, Control & Cleanup „ Store cracked batteries in a non-leaking secondary container. Do this with all cracked batteries, even if you think all the acid has drained out. If you drop a battery, treat it as if it is cracked. Put it into the containment area until you are sure it is not leaking. Vehicle and Equipment Fueling „ Design the fueling area to prevent the run-on of stormwater and the runoff of spills: - Cover fueling area if possible. - Use a perimeter drain or slope pavement inward with drainage to a sump. - Pave fueling area with concrete rather than asphalt. „ If dead-end sump is not used to collect spills, install an oil/water separator. „ Install vapor recovery nozzles to help control drips as well as air pollution. „ Discourage “topping-off’ of fuel tanks. „ Use secondary containment when transferring fuel from the tank truck to the fuel tank. „ Use adsorbent materials on small spills and general cleaning rather than hosing down the area. Remove the adsorbent materials promptly. „ Carry out all Federal and State requirements regarding underground storage tanks, or install above ground tanks. „ Do not use mobile fueling of mobile industrial equipment around the facility; rather, transport the equipment to designated fueling areas. „ Keep your Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan up-to-date. „ Train employees in proper fueling and cleanup procedures. Industrial Spill Prevention Response For the purposes of developing a spill prevention and response program to meet the stormwater regulations, facility managers should use information provided in this fact sheet and the spill prevention/response portions of the fact sheets in this handbook, for specific activities. The program should: „ Integrate with existing emergency response/hazardous materials programs (e.g., Fire Department) „ Develop procedures to prevent/mitigate spills to storm drain systems „ Identify responsible departments „ Develop and standardize reporting procedures, containment, storage, and disposal activities, documentation, and follow-up procedures „ Address spills at municipal facilities, as well as public areas 8 of 9 California Stormwater BMP Handbook January 2003 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com Spill Prevention, Control & Cleanup SC-11 January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 9 of 9 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com „ Provide training concerning spill prevention, response and cleanup to all appropriate personnel References and Resources California’s Nonpoint Source Program Plan http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/nps/index.html Clark County Storm Water Pollution Control Manual http://www.co.clark.wa.us/pubworks/bmpman.pdf King County Storm Water Pollution Control Manual http://dnr.metrokc.gov/wlr/dss/spcm.htm Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program http://www.scvurppp.org The Stormwater Managers Resource Center http://www.stormwatercenter.net/ Outdoor Loading/Unloading SC-30 Description Photo Credit: Geoff Brosseau Objectives „ Cover „ Contain „ Educate „ Reduce/Minimize „ Product Substitution Targeted Constituents Sediment  Nutrients  Trash Metals  Bacteria Oil and Grease  Organics  The loading/unloading of materials usually takes place outside on docks or terminals; therefore, materials spilled, leaked, or lost during loading/unloading may collect in the soil or on other surfaces and have the potential to be carried away by stormwater runoff or when the area is cleaned. Additionally, rainfall may wash pollutants from machinery used to unload or move materials. Implementation of the following protocols will prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to stormwater from outdoor loading/unloading of materials. Approach Reduce potential for pollutant discharge through source control pollution prevention and BMP implementation. Successful implementation depends on effective training of employees on applicable BMPs and general pollution prevention strategies and objectives. Pollution Prevention „ Keep accurate maintenance logs to evaluate materials removed and improvements made. „ Park tank trucks or delivery vehicles in designated areas so that spills or leaks can be contained. „ Limit exposure of material to rainfall whenever possible. „ Prevent stormwater run-on. „ Check equipment regularly for leaks. January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 1 of 4 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com SC-30 Outdoor Loading/Unloading Suggested Protocols Loading and Unloading – General Guidelines „ Develop an operations plan that describes procedures for loading and/or unloading. „ Conduct loading and unloading in dry weather if possible. „ Cover designated loading/unloading areas to reduce exposure of materials to rain. „ Consider placing a seal or door skirt between delivery vehicles and building to prevent exposure to rain. „ Design loading/unloading area to prevent stormwater run-on, which would include grading or berming the area, and position roof downspouts so they direct stormwater away from the loading/unloading areas. „ Have employees load and unload all materials and equipment in covered areas such as building overhangs at loading docks if feasible. „ Load/unload only at designated loading areas. „ Use drip pans underneath hose and pipe connections and other leak-prone spots during liquid transfer operations, and when making and breaking connections. Several drip pans should be stored in a covered location near the liquid transfer area so that they are always available, yet protected from precipitation when not in use. Drip pans can be made specifically for railroad tracks. Drip pans must be cleaned periodically, and drip collected materials must be disposed of properly. „ Pave loading areas with concrete instead of asphalt. „ Avoid placing storm drains in the area. „ Grade and/or berm the loading/unloading area to a drain that is connected to a deadend. Inspection „ Check loading and unloading equipment regularly for leaks, including valves, pumps, flanges and connections. „ Look for dust or fumes during loading or unloading operations. Training „ Train employees (e.g., fork lift operators) and contractors on proper spill containment and cleanup. „ Have employees trained in spill containment and cleanup present during loading/unloading. „ Train employees in proper handling techniques during liquid transfers to avoid spills. „ Make sure forklift operators are properly trained on loading and unloading procedures. 2 of 4 California Stormwater BMP Handbook January 2003 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com Outdoor Loading/Unloading SC-30 Spill Response and Prevention „ Keep your Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan up-to-date. „ Contain leaks during transfer. „ Store and maintain appropriate spill cleanup materials in a location that is readily accessible and known to all and ensure that employees are familiar with the site’s spill control plan and proper spill cleanup procedures. „ Have an emergency spill cleanup plan readily available. „ Use drip pans or comparable devices when transferring oils, solvents, and paints. Other Considerations (Limitations and Regulations) „ Space and time limitations may preclude all transfers from being performed indoors or under cover. „ It may not be possible to conduct transfers only during dry weather. Requirements Costs Costs should be low except when covering a large loading/unloading area. Maintenance „ Conduct regular inspections and make repairs as necessary. The frequency of repairs will depend on the age of the facility. „ Check loading and unloading equipment regularly for leaks. „ Conduct regular broom dry-sweeping of area. Supplemental Information Further Detail of the BMP Special Circumstances for Indoor Loading/Unloading of Materials Loading or unloading of liquids should occur in the manufacturing building so that any spills that are not completely retained can be discharged to the sanitary sewer, treatment plant, or treated in a manner consistent with local sewer authorities and permit requirements. „ For loading and unloading tank trucks to above and below ground storage tanks, the following procedures should be used: - The area where the transfer takes place should be paved. If the liquid is reactive with the asphalt, Portland cement should be used to pave the area. - The transfer area should be designed to prevent run-on of stormwater from adjacent areas. Sloping the pad and using a curb, like a speed bump, around the uphill side of the transfer area should reduce run-on. January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 3 of 4 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com SC-30 Outdoor Loading/Unloading 4 of 4 California Stormwater BMP Handbook January 2003 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com - The transfer area should be designed to prevent runoff of spilled liquids from the area. Sloping the area to a drain should prevent runoff. The drain should be connected to a dead-end sump or to the sanitary sewer. A positive control valve should be installed on the drain. „ For transfer from rail cars to storage tanks that must occur outside, use the following procedures: - Drip pans should be placed at locations where spillage may occur, such as hose connections, hose reels, and filler nozzles. Use drip pans when making and breaking connections. - Drip pan systems should be installed between the rails to collect spillage from tank cars. References and Resources California’s Nonpoint Source Program Plan http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/nps/index.html Clark County Storm Water Pollution Control Manual http://www.co.clark.wa.us/pubworks/bmpman.pdf King County Storm Water Pollution Control Manual http://dnr.metrokc.gov/wlr/dss/spcm.htm Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program http://www.scvurppp.org The Storm Water Managers Resource Center http://www.stormwatercenter.net/ Outdoor Equipment Operations SC-32 Objectives „ Cover „ Contain „ Educate „ Reduce/Minimize Targeted Constituents Sediment  Nutrients Trash Metals  Bacteria Oil and Grease  Organics  Description Outside process equipment operations and maintenance can contaminate stormwater runoff. Activities, such as grinding, painting, coating, sanding, degreasing or parts cleaning, landfills and waste piles, solid waste treatment and disposal, are examples of process operations that can lead to contamination of stormwater runoff. Source controls for outdoor process equip- ment operations and maintenance include reducing the amount of waste created, enclosing or covering all or some of the equipment, installing secondary containment, and training employees. Approach Pollution Prevention „ Perform the activity during dry periods. „ Use non-toxic chemicals for maintenance and minimize or eliminate the use of solvents. Suggested Protocols „ Consider enclosing the activity in a building and connecting the floor drains to the sanitary sewer. „ Cover the work area with a permanent roof if possible. „ Minimize contact of stormwater with outside process equipment operations through berming and drainage routing (run-on prevention). If possible, connect process equipment area to public sewer or facility wastewater treatment system. Some municipalities require that secondary containment areas be connected to the sanitary sewer, prohibiting any hard connections to the storm drain. „ Dry clean the work area regularly. Training „ Train employees to perform the activity during dry periods only or substituting benign materials for more toxic ones. „ Train employee and contractors in proper techniques for spill containment and cleanup. Employees should have the tools and knowledge to immediately begin cleaning up a spill should one occur. Spill Response and Prevention „ Keep your Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan up-to-date. January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 1 of 3 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com SC-32 Outdoor Equipment Operations „ Have employees trained in emergency spill cleanup procedures present when dangerous waste, liquid chemicals, or other wastes are delivered. „ Place a stockpile of spill cleanup materials where it will be readily accessible. „ Prevent operator errors by using engineering safe guards and thus reducing accidental releases of pollutant. „ Inspect storage areas regularly for leaks or spills. Also check for structural failure, spills and overfills due to operator error, and/or failure of piping system. Other Considerations „ Providing cover may be expensive. „ Space limitations may preclude enclosing some equipment. „ Storage sheds often must meet building and fire code requirements. Requirements Costs Costs vary depending on the complexity of the operation and the amount of control necessary for stormwater pollution control. Maintenance „ Conduct routine preventive maintenance, including checking process equipment for leaks. „ Clean the storm drain system regularly. Supplemental Information Further Detail of the BMP Hydraulic/Treatment Modifications If stormwater becomes polluted, it should be captured and treated. If you do not have your own process wastewater treatment system, consider discharging to the public sewer system. Use of the public sewer might be allowed under the following conditions: „ If the activity area is very small (less than a few hundred square feet), the local sewer authority may be willing to allow the area to remain uncovered with the drain connected to the public sewer. „ It may be possible under unusual circumstances to connect a much larger area to the public sewer, as long as the rate of stormwater discharges does not exceed the capacity of the wastewater treatment plant. The stormwater could be stored during the storm and then transferred to the public sewer when the normal flow is low, such as at night. Industries that generate large volumes of process wastewater typically have their own treatment system and corresponding permit. These industries have the discretion to use their wastewater treatment system to treat stormwater within the constraints of their permit requirements for process treatment. It may also be possible for the industry to discharge the stormwater directly to an effluent outfall without treatment as long as the total loading of the discharged process 2 of 3 California Stormwater BMP Handbook January 2003 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com Outdoor Equipment Operations SC-32 January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 3 of 3 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com water and stormwater does not exceed the loading had a stormwater treatment device been used. This could be achieved by reducing the loading from the process wastewater treatment system. Check with your Regional Water Quality Control Board or local sewering agency, as this option would be subject to permit constraints and potentially regular monitoring. References and Resources California’s Nonpoint Source Program Plan http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/nps/index.html Clark County Storm Water Pollution Control Manual http://www.co.clark.wa.us/pubworks/bmpman.pdf King County Storm Water Pollution Control Manual http://dnr.metrokc.gov/wlr/dss/spcm.htm Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program http://www.scvurppp.org The Stormwater Managers Resource Center http://www.stormwatercenter.net Waste Handling & Disposal SC-34 Description Photo Credit: Geoff Brosseau Objectives „ Cover „ Contain „ Educate „ Reduce/Minimize „ Product Substitution Targeted Constituents Sediment Nutrients Trash Metals  Bacteria  Oil and Grease  Organics  Improper storage and handling of solid wastes can allow toxic compounds, oils and greases, heavy metals, nutrients, suspended solids, and other pollutants to enter stormwater runoff. The discharge of pollutants to stormwater from waste handling and disposal can be prevented and reduced by tracking waste generation, storage, and disposal; reducing waste generation and disposal through source reduction, reuse, and recycling; and preventing run-on and runoff. Approach Pollution Prevention „ Accomplish reduction in the amount of waste generated using the following source controls: - Production planning and sequencing - Process or equipment modification - Raw material substitution or elimination - Loss prevention and housekeeping - Waste segregation and separation - Close loop recycling „ Establish a material tracking system to increase awareness about material usage. This may reduce spills and minimize contamination, thus reducing the amount of waste produced. „ Recycle materials whenever possible. January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 1 of 5 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com SC-34 Waste Handling & Disposal Suggested Protocols General „ Cover storage containers with leak proof lids or some other means. If waste is not in containers, cover all waste piles (plastic tarps are acceptable coverage) and prevent stormwater run-on and runoff with a berm. The waste containers or piles must be covered except when in use. „ Use drip pans or absorbent materials whenever grease containers are emptied by vacuum trucks or other means. Grease cannot be left on the ground. Collected grease must be properly disposed of as garbage. „ Check storage containers weekly for leaks and to ensure that lids are on tightly. Replace any that are leaking, corroded, or otherwise deteriorating. „ Sweep and clean the storage area regularly. If it is paved, do not hose down the area to a storm drain. „ Dispose of rinse and wash water from cleaning waste containers into a sanitary sewer if allowed by the local sewer authority. Do not discharge wash water to the street or storm drain. „ Transfer waste from damaged containers into safe containers. „ Take special care when loading or unloading wastes to minimize losses. Loading systems can be used to minimize spills and fugitive emission losses such as dust or mist. Vacuum transfer systems can minimize waste loss. Controlling Litter „ Post “No Littering” signs and enforce anti-litter laws. „ Provide a sufficient number of litter receptacles for the facility. „ Clean out and cover litter receptacles frequently to prevent spillage. Waste Collection „ Keep waste collection areas clean. „ Inspect solid waste containers for structural damage regularly. Repair or replace damaged containers as necessary. „ Secure solid waste containers; containers must be closed tightly when not in use. „ Do not fill waste containers with washout water or any other liquid. „ Ensure that only appropriate solid wastes are added to the solid waste container. Certain wastes such as hazardous wastes, appliances, fluorescent lamps, pesticides, etc., may not be disposed of in solid waste containers (see chemical/ hazardous waste collection section below). 2 of 5 California Stormwater BMP Handbook January 2003 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com Waste Handling & Disposal SC-34 „ Do not mix wastes; this can cause chemical reactions, make recycling impossible, and complicate disposal. Good Housekeeping „ Use all of the product before disposing of the container. „ Keep the waste management area clean at all times by sweeping and cleaning up spills immediately. „ Use dry methods when possible (e.g., sweeping, use of absorbents) when cleaning around restaurant/food handling dumpster areas. If water must be used after sweeping/using absorbents, collect water and discharge through grease interceptor to the sewer. Chemical/Hazardous Wastes „ Select designated hazardous waste collection areas on-site. „ Store hazardous materials and wastes in covered containers and protect them from vandalism. „ Place hazardous waste containers in secondary containment. „ Make sure that hazardous waste is collected, removed, and disposed of only at authorized disposal areas. „ Stencil or demarcate storm drains on the facility’s property with prohibitive message regarding waste disposal. Run-on/Runoff Prevention „ Prevent stormwater run-on from entering the waste management area by enclosing the area or building a berm around the area. „ Prevent waste materials from directly contacting rain. „ Cover waste piles with temporary covering material such as reinforced tarpaulin, polyethylene, polyurethane, polypropyleneor hypalon. „ Cover the area with a permanent roof if feasible. „ Cover dumpsters to prevent rain from washing waste out of holes or cracks in the bottom of the dumpster. „ Move the activity indoor after ensuring all safety concerns such as fire hazard and ventilation are addressed. Inspection „ Inspect and replace faulty pumps or hoses regularly to minimize the potential of releases and spills. „ Check waste management areas for leaking containers or spills. January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 3 of 5 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com SC-34 Waste Handling & Disposal „ Repair leaking equipment including valves, lines, seals, or pumps promptly. Training „ Train staff in pollution prevention measures and proper disposal methods. „ Train employees and contractors in proper spill containment and cleanup. The employee should have the tools and knowledge to immediately begin cleaning up a spill should one occur. „ Train employees and subcontractors in proper hazardous waste management. Spill Response and Prevention „ Keep your Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan up-to-date. „ Have an emergency plan, equipment and trained personnel ready at all times to deal immediately with major spills „ Collect all spilled liquids and properly dispose of them. „ Store and maintain appropriate spill cleanup materials in a location known to all near the designated wash area. „ Ensure that vehicles transporting waste have spill prevention equipment that can prevent spills during transport. Spill prevention equipment includes: - Vehicles equipped with baffles for liquid waste - Trucks with sealed gates and spill guards for solid waste Other Considerations (Limitations and Regulations) Hazardous waste cannot be reused or recycled; it must be disposed of by a licensed hazardous waste hauler. Requirements Costs Capital and O&M costs for these programs will vary substantially depending on the size of the facility and the types of waste handled. Costs should be low if there is an inventory program in place. Maintenance „ None except for maintaining equipment for material tracking program. Supplemental Information Further Detail of the BMP Land Treatment System Minimize runoff of polluted stormwater from land application by: „ Choosing a site where slopes are under 6%, the soil is permeable, there is a low water table, it is located away from wetlands or marshes, and there is a closed drainage system 4 of 5 California Stormwater BMP Handbook January 2003 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com Waste Handling & Disposal SC-34 January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 5 of 5 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com „ Avoiding application of waste to the site when it is raining or when the ground is saturated with water „ Growing vegetation on land disposal areas to stabilize soils and reduce the volume of surface water runoff from the site „ Maintaining adequate barriers between the land application site and the receiving waters (planted strips are particularly good) „ Using erosion control techniques such as mulching and matting, filter fences, straw bales, diversion terracing, and sediment basins „ Performing routine maintenance to ensure the erosion control or site stabilization measures are working Examples The port of Long Beach has a state-of-the-art database for identifying potential pollutant sources, documenting facility management practices, and tracking pollutants. References and Resources California’s Nonpoint Source Program Plan http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/nps/index.html Clark County Storm Water Pollution Control Manual http://www.co.clark.wa.us/pubworks/bmpman.pdf Solid Waste Container Best Management Practices – Fact Sheet On-Line Resources – Environmental Health and Safety. Harvard University. 2002. King County Storm Water Pollution Control Manual http://dnr.metrokc.gov/wlr/dss/spcm.htm Pollution from Surface Cleaning Folder. 1996. Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA). http://www.basmaa.org Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program http://www.scvurppp.org The Storm Water Managers Resource Center http://www.stormwatercenter.net/ Safer Alternative Products SC-35 Description Promote the use of less harmful products and products that contain little or no TMDL pollutants. Alternatives exist for most product classes including chemical fertilizers, pesticides, cleaning solutions, janitorial chemicals, automotive and paint products, and consumables (batteries, fluorescent lamps). Approach Pattern a new program after the many established programs around the state and country. Integrate this best management practice as much as possible with existing programs at your facility. Develop a comprehensive program based on: „ The “Precautionary Principle,” which is an alternative to the "Risk Assessment" model that says it's acceptable to use a potentially harmful product until physical evidence of its harmful effects are established and deemed too costly from an environmental or public health perspective. For instance, a risk assessment approach might say it's acceptable to use a pesticide until there is direct proof of an environmental impact. The Precautionary Principle approach is used to evaluate whether a given product is safe, whether it is really necessary, and whether alternative products would perform just as well. „ Environmentally Preferable Purchasing Program to minimize the purchase of products containing hazardous ingredients used in the facility's custodial services, fleet maintenance, and facility maintenance in favor of using alternate products that pose less risk to employees and to the environment. „ Integrated Pest Management (IPM) or Less-Toxic Pesticide Program, which uses a pest management approach that minimizes the use of toxic chemicals and gets rid of pests by methods that pose a lower risk to employees, the public, and the environment. „ Energy Efficiency Program including no-cost and low-cost energy conservation and efficiency actions that can reduce both energy consumption and electricity bills, along with long-term energy efficiency investments. Consider the following mechanisms for developing and implementing a comprehensive program: „ Policies January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 1 of 5 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com Objectives „ Educate „ Reduce/Minimize „ Product Substitution Targeted Constituents Sediment Nutrients  Trash Metals  Bacteria Oil and Grease  Organics  SC-35 Safer Alternative Products „ Procedures - Standard operating procedures (SOPs) - Purchasing guidelines and procedures - Bid packages (services and supplies) „ Materials - Preferred or approved product and supplier lists - Product and supplier evaluation criteria - Training sessions and manuals - Fact sheets for employees Implement this BMP in conjunction with the Vehicle and Equipment Management fact sheets (SC20 – SC22) and SC41, Building and Grounds Maintenance. Training „ Employees who handle potentially harmful materials in the use of safer alternatives. „ Purchasing departments should be encouraged to procure less hazardous materials and products that contain little or no harmful substances or TMDL pollutants. Regulations This BMP has no regulatory requirements. Existing regulations already encourage facilities to reduce the use of hazardous materials through incentives such as reduced: „ Specialized equipment storage and handling requirements, „ Storm water runoff sampling requirements, „ Training and licensing requirements, and „ Record keeping and reporting requirements. Equipment „ There are no major equipment requirements to this BMP. Limitations „ Alternative products may not be available, suitable, or effective in every case. Requirements Cost Considerations „ The primary cost is for staff time to: 1) develop new policies and procedures and 2) educate purchasing departments and employees who handle potentially harmful materials about the availability, procurement, and use of safer alternatives. 2 of 5 California Stormwater BMP Handbook January 2003 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com Safer Alternative Products SC-35 „ Some alternative products may be slightly more expensive than conventional products. Supplemental Information Employees and contractors / service providers can both be educated about safer alternatives by using information developed by a number of organizations including the references and resources listed below. The following discussion provides some general information on safer alternatives. More specific information on particular hazardous materials and the available alternatives may be found in the references and resources listed below. „ Automotive products – Less toxic alternatives are not available for many automotive products, especially engine fluids. But there are alternatives to grease lubricants, car polishes, degreasers, and windshield washer solution. Rerefined motor oil is also available. „ Vehicle/Trailer lubrication – Fifth wheel bearings on trucks require routine lubrication. Adhesive lubricants are available to replace typical chassis grease. „ Cleaners – Vegetables-based or citrus-based soaps are available to replace petroleum-based soaps/detergents. „ Paint products – Water-based paints, wood preservatives, stains, and finishes are available. „ Pesticides – Specific alternative products or methods exist to control most insects, fungi, and weeds. „ Chemical Fertilizers – Compost and soil amendments are natural alternatives. „ Consumables – Manufacturers have either reduced or are in the process of reducing the amount of heavy metals in consumables such as batteries and fluorescent lamps. All fluorescent lamps contain mercury, however low-mercury containing lamps are now available from most hardware and lighting stores. Fluorescent lamps are also more energy efficient than the average incandescent lamp. „ Janitorial chemicals – Even biodegradable soap can harm fish and wildlife before it biodegrades. Biodegradable does not mean non-toxic. Safer products and procedures are available for floor stripping and cleaning, as well as carpet, glass, metal, and restroom cleaning and disinfecting. Examples There are a number of business and trade associations, and communities with effective programs. Some of the more prominent are listed below in the references and resources section. References and Resources Note: Many of these references provide alternative products for materials that typically are used inside and disposed to the sanitary sewer as well as alternatives to products that usually end up in the storm drain. January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 3 of 5 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com SC-35 Safer Alternative Products General Sustainable Practices and Pollution Prevention Including Pollutant- Specific Information California Department of Toxic Substances Control (www.dtsc.ca.gov) California Integrated Waste Management Board (www.ciwmb.ca.gov) City of Santa Monica (www.santa-monica.org/environment) City of Palo Alto (www.city.palo-alto.ca.us/cleanbay) City and County of San Francisco, Department of the Environment (www.ci.sf.ca.us/sfenvironment) Earth 911 (www.earth911.org/master.asp) Environmental Finance Center Region IX (www.greenstart.org/efc9) Flex Your Power (www.flexyourpower.ca.gov) GreenBiz.com (www.greenbiz.com) Green Business Program (www.abag.org/bayarea/enviro/gbus/gb.html) Pacific Industrial and Business Association (www.piba.org) Sacramento Clean Water Business Partners (www.sacstormwater.org) USEPA BMP fact sheet – Alternative products (http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/menuofbmps/poll_2.cfm) USEPA Region IX Pollution Prevention Program (www.epa.gov/region09/p2) Western Regional Pollution Prevention Network (www.westp2net.org) Metals (mercury, copper) National Electrical Manufacturers Association - Environment, Health and Safety (www.nema.org) Sustainable Conservation (www.suscon.org) Auto Recycling Project Brake Pad Partnership Pesticides and Chemical Fertilizers Bio-Integral Resource Center (www.birc.org) California Department of Pesticide Regulation (www.cdpr.ca.gov) University of California Statewide IPM Program (www.ipm.ucdavis.edu/default.html) 4 of 5 California Stormwater BMP Handbook January 2003 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com Safer Alternative Products SC-35 January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 5 of 5 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com Dioxins Bay Area Dioxins Project (http://dioxin.abag.ca.gov/) Building & Grounds Maintenance SC-41 Objectives „ Cover „ Contain „ Educate „ Reduce/Minimize „ Product Substitution Targeted Constituents Sediment  Nutrients  Trash Metals  Bacteria  Oil and Grease Organics Description Stormwater runoff from building and grounds maintenance activities can be contaminated with toxic hydrocarbons in solvents, fertilizers and pesticides, suspended solids, heavy metals, abnormal pH, and oils and greases. Utilizing the protocols in this fact sheet will prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to stormwater from building and grounds maintenance activities by washing and cleaning up with as little water as possible, following good landscape management practices, preventing and cleaning up spills immediately, keeping debris from entering the storm drains, and maintaining the stormwater collection system. Approach Reduce potential for pollutant discharge through source control pollution prevention and BMP implementation. Successful implementation depends on effective training of employees on applicable BMPs and general pollution prevention strategies and objectives. Pollution Prevention „ Switch to non-toxic chemicals for maintenance when possible. „ Choose cleaning agents that can be recycled. „ Encourage proper lawn management and landscaping, including use of native vegetation. January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 1 of 5 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com SC-41 Building & Grounds Maintenance „ Encourage use of Integrated Pest Management techniques for pest control. „ Encourage proper onsite recycling of yard trimmings. „ Recycle residual paints, solvents, lumber, and other material as much as possible. Suggested Protocols Pressure Washing of Buildings, Rooftops, and Other Large Objects „ In situations where soaps or detergents are used and the surrounding area is paved, pressure washers must use a water collection device that enables collection of wash water and associated solids. A sump pump, wet vacuum or similarly effective device must be used to collect the runoff and loose materials. The collected runoff and solids must be disposed of properly. „ If soaps or detergents are not used, and the surrounding area is paved, wash runoff does not have to be collected but must be screened. Pressure washers must use filter fabric or some other type of screen on the ground and/or in the catch basin to trap the particles in wash water runoff. „ If you are pressure washing on a grassed area (with or without soap), runoff must be dispersed as sheet flow as much as possible, rather than as a concentrated stream. The wash runoff must remain on the grass and not drain to pavement. Landscaping Activities „ Dispose of grass clippings, leaves, sticks, or other collected vegetation as garbage, or by composting. Do not dispose of collected vegetation into waterways or storm drainage systems. „ Use mulch or other erosion control measures on exposed soils. Building Repair, Remodeling, and Construction „ Do not dump any toxic substance or liquid waste on the pavement, the ground, or toward a storm drain. „ Use ground or drop cloths underneath outdoor painting, scraping, and sandblasting work, and properly dispose of collected material daily. „ Use a ground cloth or oversized tub for activities such as paint mixing and tool cleaning. „ Clean paintbrushes and tools covered with water-based paints in sinks connected to sanitary sewers or in portable containers that can be dumped into a sanitary sewer drain. Brushes and tools covered with non-water-based paints, finishes, or other materials must be cleaned in a manner that enables collection of used solvents (e.g., paint thinner, turpentine, etc.) for recycling or proper disposal. „ Use a storm drain cover, filter fabric, or similarly effective runoff control mechanism if dust, grit, wash water, or other pollutants may escape the work area and enter a catch basin. This is particularly necessary on rainy days. The containment device(s) must be in place at the beginning of the work day, and accumulated dirty runoff and solids must be collected and disposed of before removing the containment device(s) at the end of the work day. 2 of 5 California Stormwater BMP Handbook January 2003 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com Building & Grounds Maintenance SC-41 „ If you need to de-water an excavation site, you may need to filter the water before discharging to a catch basin or off-site. If directed off-site, you should direct the water through hay bales and filter fabric or use other sediment filters or traps. „ Store toxic material under cover during precipitation events and when not in use. A cover would include tarps or other temporary cover material. Mowing, Trimming, and Planting „ Dispose of leaves, sticks, or other collected vegetation as garbage, by composting or at a permitted landfill. Do not dispose of collected vegetation into waterways or storm drainage systems. „ Use mulch or other erosion control measures when soils are exposed. „ Place temporarily stockpiled material away from watercourses and drain inlets, and berm or cover stockpiles to prevent material releases to the storm drain system. „ Consider an alternative approach when bailing out muddy water: do not put it in the storm drain; pour over landscaped areas. „ Use hand weeding where practical. Fertilizer and Pesticide Management „ Follow all federal, state, and local laws and regulations governing the use, storage, and disposal of fertilizers and pesticides and training of applicators and pest control advisors. „ Use less toxic pesticides that will do the job when applicable. Avoid use of copper-based pesticides if possible. „ Do not use pesticides if rain is expected. „ Do not mix or prepare pesticides for application near storm drains. „ Use the minimum amount needed for the job. „ Calibrate fertilizer distributors to avoid excessive application. „ Employ techniques to minimize off-target application (e.g., spray drift) of pesticides, including consideration of alternative application techniques. „ Apply pesticides only when wind speeds are low. „ Fertilizers should be worked into the soil rather than dumped or broadcast onto the surface. „ Irrigate slowly to prevent runoff and then only as much as is needed. „ Clean pavement and sidewalk if fertilizer is spilled on these surfaces before applying irrigation water. „ Dispose of empty pesticide containers according to the instructions on the container label. January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 3 of 5 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com SC-41 Building & Grounds Maintenance „ Use up the pesticides. Rinse containers, and use rinse water as product. Dispose of unused pesticide as hazardous waste. „ Implement storage requirements for pesticide products with guidance from the local fire department and County Agricultural Commissioner. Provide secondary containment for pesticides. Inspection „ Inspect irrigation system periodically to ensure that the right amount of water is being applied and that excessive runoff is not occurring. Minimize excess watering and repair leaks in the irrigation system as soon as they are observed. Training „ Educate and train employees on pesticide use and in pesticide application techniques to prevent pollution. „ Train employees and contractors in proper techniques for spill containment and cleanup. „ Be sure the frequency of training takes into account the complexity of the operations and the nature of the staff. Spill Response and Prevention „ Keep your Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan up-to-date. „ Place a stockpile of spill cleanup materials, such as brooms, dustpans, and vacuum sweepers (if desired) near the storage area where it will be readily accessible. „ Have employees trained in spill containment and cleanup present during the loading/unloading of dangerous wastes, liquid chemicals, or other materials. „ Familiarize employees with the Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan. „ Clean up spills immediately. Other Considerations Alternative pest/weed controls may not be available, suitable, or effective in many cases. Requirements Costs „ Cost will vary depending on the type and size of facility. „ Overall costs should be low in comparison to other BMPs. Maintenance Sweep paved areas regularly to collect loose particles. Wipe up spills with rags and other absorbent material immediately, do not hose down the area to a storm drain. 4 of 5 California Stormwater BMP Handbook January 2003 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com Building & Grounds Maintenance SC-41 January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 5 of 5 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com Supplemental Information Further Detail of the BMP Fire Sprinkler Line Flushing Building fire sprinkler line flushing may be a source of non-stormwater runoff pollution. The water entering the system is usually potable water, though in some areas it may be non-potable reclaimed wastewater. There are subsequent factors that may drastically reduce the quality of the water in such systems. Black iron pipe is usually used since it is cheaper than potable piping, but it is subject to rusting and results in lower quality water. Initially, the black iron pipe has an oil coating to protect it from rusting between manufacture and installation; this will contaminate the water from the first flush but not from subsequent flushes. Nitrates, poly- phosphates and other corrosion inhibitors, as well as fire suppressants and antifreeze may be added to the sprinkler water system. Water generally remains in the sprinkler system a long time (typically a year) and between flushes may accumulate iron, manganese, lead, copper, nickel, and zinc. The water generally becomes anoxic and contains living and dead bacteria and breakdown products from chlorination. This may result in a significant BOD problem and the water often smells. Consequently dispose fire sprinkler line flush water into the sanitary sewer. Do not allow discharge to storm drain or infiltration due to potential high levels of pollutants in fire sprinkler line water. References and Resources California’s Nonpoint Source Program Plan http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/nps/index.html Clark County Storm Water Pollution Control Manual http://www.co.clark.wa.us/pubworks/bmpman.pdf King County Storm Water Pollution Control Manual http://dnr.metrokc.gov/wlr/dss/spcm.htm Mobile Cleaners Pilot Program: Final Report. 1997. Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA). http://www.basmaa.org/ Pollution from Surface Cleaning Folder. 1996. Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA). http://www.basmaa.org/ Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program http://www.scvurppp.org The Storm Water Managers Resource Center http://www.stormwatercenter.net/ Building Repair and Construction SC-42 Objectives „ Cover „ Contain „ Educate „ Reduce/Minimize „ Recycle Targeted Constituents Sediment  Nutrients Trash  Metals  Bacteria Oil and Grease  Organics  Description Modifications are common particularly at large industrial sites. The activity may vary from minor and normal building repair to major remodeling, or the construction of new facilities. These activities can generate pollutants including solvents, paints, paint and varnish removers, finishing residues, spent thinners, soap cleaners, kerosene, asphalt and concrete materials, adhesive residues, and old asbestos installation. Protocols in this fact sheet are intended to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to stormwater from building repair, remodeling, and construction by using soil erosion controls, enclosing or covering building material storage areas, using good housekeeping practices, using safer alternative products, and training employees. Approach Pollution Prevention „ Recycle residual paints, solvents, lumber, and other materials to the maximum extent practical. „ Buy recycled products to the maximum extent practical. „ Inform on-site contractors of company policy on these matters and include appropriate provisions in their contract to ensure certain proper housekeeping and disposal practices are implemented. January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 1 of 4 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com SC-42 Building Repair and Construction „ Make sure that nearby storm drains are well marked to minimize the chance of inadvertent disposal of residual paints and other liquids. Suggested Protocols Repair & Remodeling „ Follow BMPs identified in Construction BMP Handbook. „ Maintain good housekeeping practices while work is underway. „ Keep the work site clean and orderly. Remove debris in a timely fashion. Sweep the area. „ Cover materials of particular concern that must be left outside, particularly during the rainy season. „ Do not dump waste liquids down the storm drain. „ Dispose of wash water, sweepings, and sediments properly. „ Store materials properly that are normally used in repair and remodeling such as paints and solvents. „ Sweep out the gutter or wash the gutter and trap the particles at the outlet of the downspout if when repairing roofs, small particles have accumulated in the gutter. A sock or geofabric placed over the outlet may effectively trap the materials. If the downspout is tight lined, place a temporary plug at the first convenient point in the storm drain and pump out the water with a vactor truck, and clean the catch basin sump where you placed the plug. „ Properly store and dispose waste materials generated from construction activities. See Construction BMP Handbook. „ Clean the storm drain system in the immediate vicinity of the construction activity after it is completed. Painting „ Enclose painting operations consistent with local air quality regulations and OSHA. „ Local air pollution regulations may, in many areas of the state, specify painting procedures which if properly carried out are usually sufficient to protect water quality. „ Develop paint handling procedures for proper use, storage, and disposal of paints. „ Transport paint and materials to and from job sites in containers with secure lids and tied down to the transport vehicle. „ Test and inspect spray equipment prior to starting to paint. Tighten all hoses and connections and do not overfill paint containers. „ Mix paint indoors before using so that any spill will not be exposed to rain. Do so even during dry weather because cleanup of a spill will never be 100% effective. „ Transfer and load paint and hot thermoplastic away from storm drain inlets. 2 of 4 California Stormwater BMP Handbook January 2003 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com Building Repair and Construction SC-42 „ Do not transfer or load paint near storm drain inlets. „ Plug nearby storm drain inlets prior to starting painting and remove plugs when job is complete when there is significant risk of a spill reaching storm drains. „ Cover nearby storm drain inlets prior to starting work if sand blasting is used to remove paint. „ Use a ground cloth to collect the chips if painting requires scraping or sand blasting of the existing surface. Dispose the residue properly. „ Cover or enclose painting operations properly to avoid drift. „ Clean the application equipment in a sink that is connected to the sanitary sewer if using water based paints. „ Capture all cleanup-water and dispose of properly. „ Dispose of paints containing lead or tributyl tin and considered a hazardous waste properly. „ Store leftover paints if they are to be kept for the next job properly, or dispose properly. „ Recycle paint when possible. Dispose of paint at an appropriate household hazardous waste facility. Training Proper education of off-site contractors is often overlooked. The conscientious efforts of well trained employees can be lost by unknowing off-site contractors, so make sure they are well informed about what they are expected to do. Spill Response and Prevention „ Keep your Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan up-to-date. „ Place a stockpile of spill cleanup materials where it will be readily accessible. „ Clean up spills immediately. „ Excavate and remove the contaminated (stained) soil if a spill occurs on dirt. Limitations „ This BMP is for minor construction only. The State’s General Construction Activity Stormwater Permit has more requirements for larger projects. The companion “Construction Best Management Practice Handbook” contains specific guidance and best management practices for larger-scale projects. „ Hazardous waste that cannot be reused or recycled must be disposed of by a licensed hazardous waste hauler. „ Be certain that actions to help stormwater quality are consistent with Cal- and Fed-OSHA and air quality regulations. January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 3 of 4 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com SC-42 Building Repair and Construction 4 of 4 California Stormwater BMP Handbook January 2003 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com Requirements Costs These BMPs are generally low to modest in cost. Maintenance N/A Supplemental Information Further Detail of the BMP Soil/Erosion Control If the work involves exposing large areas of soil, employ the appropriate soil erosion and control techniques. See the Construction Best Management Practice Handbook. If old buildings are being torn down and not replaced in the near future, stabilize the site using measures described in SC-40 Contaminated or Erodible Areas. If a building is to be placed over an open area with a storm drainage system, make sure the storm inlets within the building are covered or removed, or the storm line is connected to the sanitary sewer. If because of the remodeling a new drainage system is to be installed or the existing system is to be modified, consider installing catch basins as they serve as effective “in- line” treatment devices. See Treatment Control Fact Sheet TC-20 Wet Pond/Basin in Section 5 of the New Development and Redevelopment Handbook regarding design criteria. Include in the catch basin a “turn-down” elbow or similar device to trap floatables. References and Resources California’s Nonpoint Source Program Plan http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/nps/index.html Clark County Storm Water Pollution Control Manual http://www.co.clark.wa.us/pubworks/bmpman.pdf King County Storm Water Pollution Control Manual http://dnr.metrokc.gov/wlr/dss/spcm.htm Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program http://www.scvurppp.org The Storm Water Managers Resource Center http://www.stormwatercenter.net/ Parking/Storage Area Maintenance SC-43 Objectives „ Cover „ Contain „ Educate „ Reduce/Minimize „ Product Substitution Targeted Constituents Sediment  Nutrients Trash  Metals  Bacteria Oil and Grease  Organics  Description Parking lots and storage areas can contribute a number of substances, such as trash, suspended solids, hydrocarbons, oil and grease, and heavy metals that can enter receiving waters through stormwater runoff or non-stormwater discharges. The protocols in this fact sheet are intended to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants from parking/storage areas and include using good housekeeping practices, following appropriate cleaning BMPs, and training employees. Approach The goal of this program is to ensure stormwater pollution prevention practices are considered when conducting activities on or around parking areas and storage areas to reduce potential for pollutant discharge to receiving waters. Successful implementation depends on effective training of employees on applicable BMPs and general pollution prevention strategies and objectives. Pollution Prevention „ Encourage alternative designs and maintenance strategies for impervious parking lots. (See New Development and Redevelopment BMP Handbook) „ Keep accurate maintenance logs to evaluate BMP implementation. January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 1 of 4 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com SC-43 Parking/Storage Area Maintenance Suggested Protocols General „ Keep the parking and storage areas clean and orderly. Remove debris in a timely fashion. „ Allow sheet runoff to flow into biofilters (vegetated strip and swale) and/or infiltration devices. „ Utilize sand filters or oleophilic collectors for oily waste in low quantities. „ Arrange rooftop drains to prevent drainage directly onto paved surfaces. „ Design lot to include semi-permeable hardscape. „ Discharge soapy water remaining in mop or wash buckets to the sanitary sewer through a sink, toilet, clean-out, or wash area with drain. Controlling Litter „ Post “No Littering” signs and enforce anti-litter laws. „ Provide an adequate number of litter receptacles. „ Clean out and cover litter receptacles frequently to prevent spillage. „ Provide trash receptacles in parking lots to discourage litter. „ Routinely sweep, shovel, and dispose of litter in the trash. Surface Cleaning „ Use dry cleaning methods (e.g., sweeping, vacuuming) to prevent the discharge of pollutants into the stormwater conveyance system if possible. „ Establish frequency of public parking lot sweeping based on usage and field observations of waste accumulation. „ Sweep all parking lots at least once before the onset of the wet season. „ Follow the procedures below if water is used to clean surfaces: - Block the storm drain or contain runoff. - Collect and pump wash water to the sanitary sewer or discharge to a pervious surface. Do not allow wash water to enter storm drains. - Dispose of parking lot sweeping debris and dirt at a landfill. „ Follow the procedures below when cleaning heavy oily deposits: - Clean oily spots with absorbent materials. - Use a screen or filter fabric over inlet, then wash surfaces. 2 of 4 California Stormwater BMP Handbook January 2003 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com Parking/Storage Area Maintenance SC-43 - Do not allow discharges to the storm drain. - Vacuum/pump discharges to a tank or discharge to sanitary sewer. - Appropriately dispose of spilled materials and absorbents. Surface Repair „ Preheat, transfer or load hot bituminous material away from storm drain inlets. „ Apply concrete, asphalt, and seal coat during dry weather to prevent contamination from contacting stormwater runoff. „ Cover and seal nearby storm drain inlets where applicable (with waterproof material or mesh) and manholes before applying seal coat, slurry seal, etc. Leave covers in place until job is complete and all water from emulsified oil sealants has drained or evaporated. Clean any debris from these covered manholes and drains for proper disposal. „ Use only as much water as necessary for dust control, to avoid runoff. „ Catch drips from paving equipment that is not in use with pans or absorbent material placed under the machines. Dispose of collected material and absorbents properly. Inspection „ Have designated personnel conduct inspections of parking facilities and stormwater conveyance systems associated with parking facilities on a regular basis. „ Inspect cleaning equipment/sweepers for leaks on a regular basis. Training „ Provide regular training to field employees and/or contractors regarding cleaning of paved areas and proper operation of equipment. „ Train employees and contractors in proper techniques for spill containment and cleanup. Spill Response and Prevention „ Keep your Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan up-to-date. „ Place a stockpile of spill cleanup materials where it will be readily accessible or at a central location. „ Clean up fluid spills immediately with absorbent rags or material. „ Dispose of spilled material and absorbents properly. Other Considerations Limitations related to sweeping activities at large parking facilities may include high equipment costs, the need for sweeper operator training, and the inability of current sweeper technology to remove oil and grease. January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 3 of 4 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com SC-43 Parking/Storage Area Maintenance 4 of 4 California Stormwater BMP Handbook January 2003 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com Requirements Costs Cleaning/sweeping costs can be quite large. Construction and maintenance of stormwater structural controls can be quite expensive as well. Maintenance „ Sweep parking lot regularly to minimize cleaning with water. „ Clean out oil/water/sand separators regularly, especially after heavy storms. „ Clean parking facilities regularly to prevent accumulated wastes and pollutants from being discharged into conveyance systems during rainy conditions. Supplemental Information Further Detail of the BMP Surface Repair Apply concrete, asphalt, and seal coat during dry weather to prevent contamination from contacting stormwater runoff. Where applicable, cover and seal nearby storm drain inlets (with waterproof material or mesh) and manholes before applying seal coat, slurry seal, etc. Leave covers in place until job is complete and all water from emulsified oil sealants has drained or evaporated. Clean any debris from these covered manholes and drains for proper disposal. Only use only as much water as is necessary for dust control to avoid runoff. References and Resources California’s Nonpoint Source Program Plan http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/nps/index.html Clark County Storm Water Pollution Control Manual http://www.co.clark.wa.us/pubworks/bmpman.pdf King County Storm Water Pollution Control Manual http://dnr.metrokc.gov/wlr/dss/spcm.htm Pollution from Surface Cleaning Folder. 1996. Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA). http://www.basmaa.org/ Oregon Association of Clean Water Agencies. Oregon Municipal Stormwater Toolbox for Maintenance Practices. June 1998. Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program http://www.scvurppp.org The Storm Water Managers Resource Center http://www.stormwatercenter.net/ Drainage System Maintenance SC-44 Objectives „ Cover „ Contain „ Educate „ Reduce/Minimize Targeted Constituents Sediment  Nutrients Trash  Metals Bacteria  Oil and Grease Organics Description As a consequence of its function, the stormwater conveyance system collects and transports urban runoff and stormwater that may contain certain pollutants. The protocols in this fact sheet are intended to reduce pollutants reaching receiving waters through proper conveyance system operation and maintenance. Approach Pollution Prevention Maintain catch basins, stormwater inlets, and other stormwater conveyance structures on a regular basis to remove pollutants, reduce high pollutant concentrations during the first flush of storms, prevent clogging of the downstream conveyance system, restore catch basins’ sediment trapping capacity, and ensure the system functions properly hydraulically to avoid flooding. Suggested Protocols Catch Basins/Inlet Structures „ Staff should regularly inspect facilities to ensure compliance with the following: - Immediate repair of any deterioration threatening structural integrity. - Cleaning before the sump is 40% full. Catch basins should be cleaned as frequently as needed to meet this standard. - Stenciling of catch basins and inlets (see SC34 Waste Handling and Disposal). January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 1 of 6 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com SC-44 Drainage System Maintenance „ Clean catch basins, storm drain inlets, and other conveyance structures before the wet season to remove sediments and debris accumulated during the summer. „ Conduct inspections more frequently during the wet season for problem areas where sediment or trash accumulates more often. Clean and repair as needed. „ Keep accurate logs of the number of catch basins cleaned. „ Store wastes collected from cleaning activities of the drainage system in appropriate containers or temporary storage sites in a manner that prevents discharge to the storm drain. „ Dewater the wastes if necessary with outflow into the sanitary sewer if permitted. Water should be treated with an appropriate filtering device prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer. If discharge to the sanitary sewer is not allowed, water should be pumped or vacuumed to a tank and properly disposed. Do not dewater near a storm drain or stream. Storm Drain Conveyance System „ Locate reaches of storm drain with deposit problems and develop a flushing schedule that keeps the pipe clear of excessive buildup. „ Collect and pump flushed effluent to the sanitary sewer for treatment whenever possible. Pump Stations „ Clean all storm drain pump stations prior to the wet season to remove silt and trash. „ Do not allow discharge to reach the storm drain system when cleaning a storm drain pump station or other facility. „ Conduct routine maintenance at each pump station. „ Inspect, clean, and repair as necessary all outlet structures prior to the wet season. Open Channel „ Modify storm channel characteristics to improve channel hydraulics, increase pollutant removals, and enhance channel/creek aesthetic and habitat value. „ Conduct channel modification/improvement in accordance with existing laws. Any person, government agency, or public utility proposing an activity that will change the natural (emphasis added) state of any river, stream, or lake in California, must enter into a Steam or Lake Alteration Agreement with the Department of Fish and Game. The developer-applicant should also contact local governments (city, county, special districts), other state agencies (SWRCB, RWQCB, Department of Forestry, Department of Water Resources), and Federal Corps of Engineers and USFWS. Illicit Connections and Discharges „ Look for evidence of illegal discharges or illicit connections during routine maintenance of conveyance system and drainage structures: - Is there evidence of spills such as paints, discoloring, etc? 2 of 6 California Stormwater BMP Handbook January 2003 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com Drainage System Maintenance SC-44 - Are there any odors associated with the drainage system? - Record locations of apparent illegal discharges/illicit connections? - Track flows back to potential dischargers and conduct aboveground inspections. This can be done through visual inspection of upgradient manholes or alternate techniques including zinc chloride smoke testing, fluorometric dye testing, physical inspection testing, or television camera inspection. - Eliminate the discharge once the origin of flow is established. „ Stencil or demarcate storm drains, where applicable, to prevent illegal disposal of pollutants. Storm drain inlets should have messages such as “Dump No Waste Drains to Stream” stenciled next to them to warn against ignorant or intentional dumping of pollutants into the storm drainage system. „ Refer to fact sheet SC-10 Non-Stormwater Discharges. Illegal Dumping „ Inspect and clean up hot spots and other storm drainage areas regularly where illegal dumping and disposal occurs. „ Establish a system for tracking incidents. The system should be designed to identify the following: - Illegal dumping hot spots - Types and quantities (in some cases) of wastes - Patterns in time of occurrence (time of day/night, month, or year) - Mode of dumping (abandoned containers, “midnight dumping” from moving vehicles, direct dumping of materials, accidents/spills) - Responsible parties „ Post “No Dumping” signs in problem areas with a phone number for reporting dumping and disposal. Signs should also indicate fines and penalties for illegal dumping. „ Refer to fact sheet SC-10 Non-Stormwater Discharges. Training „ Train crews in proper maintenance activities, including record keeping and disposal. „ Allow only properly trained individuals to handle hazardous materials/wastes. „ Have staff involved in detection and removal of illicit connections trained in the following: - OSHA-required Health and Safety Training (29 CFR 1910.120) plus annual refresher training (as needed). January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 3 of 6 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com SC-44 Drainage System Maintenance - OSHA Confined Space Entry training (Cal-OSHA Confined Space, Title 8 and Federal OSHA 29 CFR 1910.146). - Procedural training (field screening, sampling, smoke/dye testing, TV inspection). Spill Response and Prevention „ Investigate all reports of spills, leaks, and/or illegal dumping promptly. „ Clean up all spills and leaks using “dry” methods (with absorbent materials and/or rags) or dig up, remove, and properly dispose of contaminated soil. „ Refer to fact sheet SC-11 Spill Prevention, Control, and Cleanup. Other Considerations (Limitations and Regulations) „ Clean-up activities may create a slight disturbance for local aquatic species. Access to items and material on private property may be limited. Trade-offs may exist between channel hydraulics and water quality/riparian habitat. If storm channels or basins are recognized as wetlands, many activities, including maintenance, may be subject to regulation and permitting. „ Storm drain flushing is most effective in small diameter pipes (36-inch diameter pipe or less, depending on water supply and sediment collection capacity). Other considerations associated with storm drain flushing may include the availability of a water source, finding a downstream area to collect sediments, liquid/sediment disposal, and prohibition against disposal of flushed effluent to sanitary sewer in some areas. „ Regulations may include adoption of substantial penalties for illegal dumping and disposal. „ Local municipal codes may include sections prohibiting discharge of soil, debris, refuse, hazardous wastes, and other pollutants into the storm drain system. Requirements Costs „ An aggressive catch basin cleaning program could require a significant capital and O&M budget. „ The elimination of illegal dumping is dependent on the availability, convenience, and cost of alternative means of disposal. The primary cost is for staff time. Cost depends on how aggressively a program is implemented. Other cost considerations for an illegal dumping program include: - Purchase and installation of signs. - Rental of vehicle(s) to haul illegally-disposed items and material to landfills. - Rental of heavy equipment to remove larger items (e.g., car bodies) from channels. - Purchase of landfill space to dispose of illegally-dumped items and material. 4 of 6 California Stormwater BMP Handbook January 2003 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com Drainage System Maintenance SC-44 „ Methods used for illicit connection detection (smoke testing, dye testing, visual inspection, and flow monitoring) can be costly and time-consuming. Site-specific factors, such as the level of impervious area, the density and ages of buildings, and type of land use will determine the level of investigation necessary. Maintenance „ Two-person teams may be required to clean catch basins with vactor trucks. „ Teams of at least two people plus administrative personnel are required to identify illicit discharges, depending on the complexity of the storm sewer system. „ Arrangements must be made for proper disposal of collected wastes. „ Technical staff are required to detect and investigate illegal dumping violations. Supplemental Information Further Detail of the BMP Storm Drain Flushing Flushing is a common maintenance activity used to improve pipe hydraulics and to remove pollutants in storm drainage systems. Flushing may be designed to hydraulically convey accumulated material to strategic locations, such as an open channel, another point where flushing will be initiated, or the sanitary sewer and the treatment facilities, thus preventing resuspension and overflow of a portion of the solids during storm events. Flushing prevents “plug flow” discharges of concentrated pollutant loadings and sediments. Deposits can hinder the designed conveyance capacity of the storm drain system and potentially cause backwater conditions in severe cases of clogging. Storm drain flushing usually takes place along segments of pipe with grades that are too flat to maintain adequate velocity to keep particles in suspension. An upstream manhole is selected to place an inflatable device that temporarily plugs the pipe. Further upstream, water is pumped into the line to create a flushing wave. When the upstream reach of pipe is sufficiently full to cause a flushing wave, the inflated device is rapidly deflated with the assistance of a vacuum pump, thereby releasing the backed up water and resulting in the cleaning of the storm drain segment. To further reduce impacts of stormwater pollution, a second inflatable device placed well downstream may be used to recollect the water after the force of the flushing wave has dissipated. A pump may then be used to transfer the water and accumulated material to the sanitary sewer for treatment. In some cases, an interceptor structure may be more practical or required to recollect the flushed waters. It has been found that cleansing efficiency of periodic flush waves is dependent upon flush volume, flush discharge rate, sewer slope, sewer length, sewer flow rate, sewer diameter, and population density. As a rule of thumb, the length of line to be flushed should not exceed 700 feet. At this maximum recommended length, the percent removal efficiency ranges between 65- 75% for organics and 55-65% for dry weather grit/inorganic material. The percent removal efficiency drops rapidly beyond that. Water is commonly supplied by a water truck, but fire hydrants can also supply water. To make the best use of water, it is recommended that reclaimed water be used or that fire hydrant line flushing coincide with storm sewer flushing. January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 5 of 6 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com SC-44 Drainage System Maintenance 6 of 6 California Stormwater BMP Handbook January 2003 Industrial and Commercial www.cabmphandbooks.com References and Resources California’s Nonpoint Source Program Plan http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/nps/index.html Clark County Storm Water Pollution Control Manual http://www.co.clark.wa.us/pubworks/bmpman.pdf Ferguson, B.K. 1991. Urban Stream Reclamation, p. 324-322, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. King County Storm Water Pollution Control Manual http://dnr.metrokc.gov/wlr/dss/spcm.htm Oregon Association of Clean Water Agencies. Oregon Municipal Stormwater Toolbox for Maintenance Practices. June 1998. Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program http://www.scvurppp.org The Storm Water Managers Resource Center http://www.stormwatercenter.net United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2002. Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations Storm Drain System Cleaning. On line: http://www.epa.gov/npdes/menuofbmps/poll_16.htm Efficient Irrigation SD-12 January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 1 of 2 New Development and Redevelopment www.cabmphandbooks.com Description Irrigation water provided to landscaped areas may result in excess irrigation water being conveyed into stormwater drainage systems. Approach Project plan designs for development and redevelopment should include application methods of irrigation water that minimize runoff of excess irrigation water into the stormwater conveyance system. Suitable Applications Appropriate applications include residential, commercial and industrial areas planned for development or redevelopment. (Detached residential single-family homes are typically excluded from this requirement.) Design Considerations Designing New Installations The following methods to reduce excessive irrigation runoff should be considered, and incorporated and implemented where determined applicable and feasible by the Permittee: „ Employ rain-triggered shutoff devices to prevent irrigation after precipitation. „ Design irrigation systems to each landscape area’s specific water requirements. „ Include design featuring flow reducers or shutoff valves triggered by a pressure drop to control water loss in the event of broken sprinkler heads or lines. „ Implement landscape plans consistent with County or City water conservation resolutions, which may include provision of water sensors, programmable irrigation times (for short cycles), etc. Design Objectives ; Maximize Infiltration ; Provide Retention ; Slow Runoff Minimize Impervious Land Coverage Prohibit Dumping of Improper Materials Contain Pollutants Collect and Convey SD-12 Efficient Irrigation 2 of 2 California Stormwater BMP Handbook January 2003 New Development and Redevelopment www.cabmphandbooks.com „ Design timing and application methods of irrigation water to minimize the runoff of excess irrigation water into the storm water drainage system. „ Group plants with similar water requirements in order to reduce excess irrigation runoff and promote surface filtration. Choose plants with low irrigation requirements (for example, native or drought tolerant species). Consider design features such as: - Using mulches (such as wood chips or bar) in planter areas without ground cover to minimize sediment in runoff - Installing appropriate plant materials for the location, in accordance with amount of sunlight and climate, and use native plant materials where possible and/or as recommended by the landscape architect - Leaving a vegetative barrier along the property boundary and interior watercourses, to act as a pollutant filter, where appropriate and feasible - Choosing plants that minimize or eliminate the use of fertilizer or pesticides to sustain growth „ Employ other comparable, equally effective methods to reduce irrigation water runoff. Redeveloping Existing Installations Various jurisdictional stormwater management and mitigation plans (SUSMP, WQMP, etc.) define “redevelopment” in terms of amounts of additional impervious area, increases in gross floor area and/or exterior construction, and land disturbing activities with structural or impervious surfaces. The definition of “ redevelopment” must be consulted to determine whether or not the requirements for new development apply to areas intended for redevelopment. If the definition applies, the steps outlined under “designing new installations” above should be followed. Other Resources A Manual for the Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, May 2002. Model Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) for San Diego County, Port of San Diego, and Cities in San Diego County, February 14, 2002. Model Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for County of Orange, Orange County Flood Control District, and the Incorporated Cities of Orange County, Draft February 2003. Ventura Countywide Technical Guidance Manual for Stormwater Quality Control Measures, July 2002. Storm Drain Signage SD-13 January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 1 of 2 New Development and Redevelopment www.cabmphandbooks.com Description Waste materials dumped into storm drain inlets can have severe impacts on receiving and ground waters. Posting notices regarding discharge prohibitions at storm drain inlets can prevent waste dumping. Storm drain signs and stencils are highly visible source controls that are typically placed directly adjacent to storm drain inlets. Approach The stencil or affixed sign contains a brief statement that prohibits dumping of improper materials into the urban runoff conveyance system. Storm drain messages have become a popular method of alerting the public about the effects of and the prohibitions against waste disposal. Suitable Applications Stencils and signs alert the public to the destination of pollutants discharged to the storm drain. Signs are appropriate in residential, commercial, and industrial areas, as well as any other area where contributions or dumping to storm drains is likely. Design Considerations Storm drain message markers or placards are recommended at all storm drain inlets within the boundary of a development project. The marker should be placed in clear sight facing toward anyone approaching the inlet from either side. All storm drain inlet locations should be identified on the development site map. Designing New Installations The following methods should be considered for inclusion in the project design and show on project plans: „ Provide stenciling or labeling of all storm drain inlets and catch basins, constructed or modified, within the project area with prohibitive language. Examples include “NO DUMPING Design Objectives Maximize Infiltration Provide Retention Slow Runoff Minimize Impervious Land Coverage ; Prohibit Dumping of Improper Materials Contain Pollutants Collect and Convey SD-13 Storm Drain Signage 2 of 2 California Stormwater BMP Handbook January 2003 New Development and Redevelopment www.cabmphandbooks.com – DRAINS TO OCEAN” and/or other graphical icons to discourage illegal dumping. „ Post signs with prohibitive language and/or graphical icons, which prohibit illegal dumping at public access points along channels and creeks within the project area. Note - Some local agencies have approved specific signage and/or storm drain message placards for use. Consult local agency stormwater staff to determine specific requirements for placard types and methods of application. Redeveloping Existing Installations Various jurisdictional stormwater management and mitigation plans (SUSMP, WQMP, etc.) define “redevelopment” in terms of amounts of additional impervious area, increases in gross floor area and/or exterior construction, and land disturbing activities with structural or impervious surfaces. If the project meets the definition of “redevelopment”, then the requirements stated under “ designing new installations” above should be included in all project design plans. Additional Information Maintenance Considerations „ Legibility of markers and signs should be maintained. If required by the agency with jurisdiction over the project, the owner/operator or homeowner’s association should enter into a maintenance agreement with the agency or record a deed restriction upon the property title to maintain the legibility of placards or signs. Placement „ Signage on top of curbs tends to weather and fade. „ Signage on face of curbs tends to be worn by contact with vehicle tires and sweeper brooms. Supplemental Information Examples „ Most MS4 programs have storm drain signage programs. Some MS4 programs will provide stencils, or arrange for volunteers to stencil storm drains as part of their outreach program. Other Resources A Manual for the Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, May 2002. Model Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) for San Diego County, Port of San Diego, and Cities in San Diego County, February 14, 2002. Model Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for County of Orange, Orange County Flood Control District, and the Incorporated Cities of Orange County, Draft February 2003. Ventura Countywide Technical Guidance Manual for Stormwater Quality Control Measures, July 2002. Maintenance Bays & Docks SD-31 January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 1 of 2 New Development and Redevelopment www.cabmphandbooks.com Description Several measures can be taken to prevent operations at maintenance bays and loading docks from contributing a variety of toxic compounds, oil and grease, heavy metals, nutrients, suspended solids, and other pollutants to the stormwater conveyance system. Approach In designs for maintenance bays and loading docks, containment is encouraged. Preventative measures include overflow containment structures and dead-end sumps. However, in the case of loading docks from grocery stores and warehouse/distribution centers, engineered infiltration systems may be considered. Suitable Applications Appropriate applications include commercial and industrial areas planned for development or redevelopment. Design Considerations Design requirements for vehicle maintenance and repair are governed by Building and Fire Codes, and by current local agency ordinances, and zoning requirements. The design criteria described in this fact sheet are meant to enhance and be consistent with these code requirements. Designing New Installations Designs of maintenance bays should consider the following: „ Repair/maintenance bays and vehicle parts with fluids should be indoors; or designed to preclude urban run-on and runoff. „ Repair/maintenance floor areas should be paved with Portland cement concrete (or equivalent smooth impervious surface). Design Objectives Maximize Infiltration Provide Retention Slow Runoff Minimize Impervious Land Coverage ; Prohibit Dumping of Improper Materials ; Contain Pollutants Collect and Convey SD-31 Maintenance Bays & Docks 2 of 2 California Stormwater BMP Handbook January 2003 New Development and Redevelopment www.cabmphandbooks.com „ Repair/maintenance bays should be designed to capture all wash water leaks and spills. Provide impermeable berms, drop inlets, trench catch basins, or overflow containment structures around repair bays to prevent spilled materials and wash-down waters form entering the storm drain system. Connect drains to a sump for collection and disposal. Direct connection of the repair/maintenance bays to the storm drain system is prohibited. If required by local jurisdiction, obtain an Industrial Waste Discharge Permit. „ Other features may be comparable and equally effective. The following designs of loading/unloading dock areas should be considered: „ Loading dock areas should be covered, or drainage should be designed to preclude urban run-on and runoff. „ Direct connections into storm drains from depressed loading docks (truck wells) are prohibited. „ Below-grade loading docks from grocery stores and warehouse/distribution centers of fresh food items should drain through water quality inlets, or to an engineered infiltration system, or an equally effective alternative. Pre-treatment may also be required. „ Other features may be comparable and equally effective. Redeveloping Existing Installations Various jurisdictional stormwater management and mitigation plans (SUSMP, WQMP, etc.) define “redevelopment” in terms of amounts of additional impervious area, increases in gross floor area and/or exterior construction, and land disturbing activities with structural or impervious surfaces. The definition of “ redevelopment” must be consulted to determine whether or not the requirements for new development apply to areas intended for redevelopment. If the definition applies, the steps outlined under “designing new installations” above should be followed. Additional Information Stormwater and non-stormwater will accumulate in containment areas and sumps with impervious surfaces. Contaminated accumulated water must be disposed of in accordance with applicable laws and cannot be discharged directly to the storm drain or sanitary sewer system without the appropriate permit. Other Resources A Manual for the Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, May 2002. Model Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) for San Diego County, Port of San Diego, and Cities in San Diego County, February 14, 2002. Model Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for County of Orange, Orange County Flood Control District, and the Incorporated Cities of Orange County, Draft February 2003. Ventura Countywide Technical Guidance Manual for Stormwater Quality Control Measures, July 2002. Trash Storage Areas SD-32 January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 1 of 2 New Development and Redevelopment www.cabmphandbooks.com Description Trash storage areas are areas where a trash receptacle (s) are located for use as a repository for solid wastes. Stormwater runoff from areas where trash is stored or disposed of can be polluted. In addition, loose trash and debris can be easily transported by water or wind into nearby storm drain inlets, channels, and/or creeks. Waste handling operations that may be sources of stormwater pollution include dumpsters, litter control, and waste piles. Approach This fact sheet contains details on the specific measures required to prevent or reduce pollutants in stormwater runoff associated with trash storage and handling. Preventative measures including enclosures, containment structures, and impervious pavements to mitigate spills, should be used to reduce the likelihood of contamination. Suitable Applications Appropriate applications include residential, commercial and industrial areas planned for development or redevelopment. (Detached residential single-family homes are typically excluded from this requirement.) Design Considerations Design requirements for waste handling areas are governed by Building and Fire Codes, and by current local agency ordinances and zoning requirements. The design criteria described in this fact sheet are meant to enhance and be consistent with these code and ordinance requirements. Hazardous waste should be handled in accordance with legal requirements established in Title 22, California Code of Regulation. Wastes from commercial and industrial sites are typically hauled by either public or commercial carriers that may have design or access requirements for waste storage areas. The design criteria in this fact sheet are recommendations and are not intended to be in conflict with requirements established by the waste hauler. The waste hauler should be contacted prior to the design of your site trash collection areas. Conflicts or issues should be discussed with the local agency. Designing New Installations Trash storage areas should be designed to consider the following structural or treatment control BMPs: „ Design trash container areas so that drainage from adjoining roofs and pavement is diverted around the area(s) to avoid run-on. This might include berming or grading the waste handling area to prevent run-on of stormwater. „ Make sure trash container areas are screened or walled to prevent off-site transport of trash. Design Objectives Maximize Infiltration Provide Retention Slow Runoff Minimize Impervious Land Coverage Prohibit Dumping of Improper Materials ; Contain Pollutants Collect and Convey SD-32 Trash Storage Areas 2 of 2 California Stormwater BMP Handbook January 2003 New Development and Redevelopment www.cabmphandbooks.com „ Use lined bins or dumpsters to reduce leaking of liquid waste. „ Provide roofs, awnings, or attached lids on all trash containers to minimize direct precipitation and prevent rainfall from entering containers. „ Pave trash storage areas with an impervious surface to mitigate spills. „ Do not locate storm drains in immediate vicinity of the trash storage area. „ Post signs on all dumpsters informing users that hazardous materials are not to be disposed of therein. Redeveloping Existing Installations Various jurisdictional stormwater management and mitigation plans (SUSMP, WQMP, etc.) define “redevelopment” in terms of amounts of additional impervious area, increases in gross floor area and/or exterior construction, and land disturbing activities with structural or impervious surfaces. The definition of “ redevelopment” must be consulted to determine whether or not the requirements for new development apply to areas intended for redevelopment. If the definition applies, the steps outlined under “designing new installations” above should be followed. Additional Information Maintenance Considerations The integrity of structural elements that are subject to damage (i.e., screens, covers, and signs) must be maintained by the owner/operator. Maintenance agreements between the local agency and the owner/operator may be required. Some agencies will require maintenance deed restrictions to be recorded of the property title. If required by the local agency, maintenance agreements or deed restrictions must be executed by the owner/operator before improvement plans are approved. Other Resources A Manual for the Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, May 2002. Model Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) for San Diego County, Port of San Diego, and Cities in San Diego County, February 14, 2002. Model Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for County of Orange, Orange County Flood Control District, and the Incorporated Cities of Orange County, Draft February 2003. Ventura Countywide Technical Guidance Manual for Stormwater Quality Control Measures, July 2002. Attachment F Infiltration Report 22885 Savi Ranch Parkway  Suite E  Yorba Linda  California  92887 voice: (714) 685-1115  fax: (714) 685-1118  www.socalgeo.com June 25, 2021 IDI Logistics 840 Apollo Street Suite 100 El Segundo, CA 90245 Attention: Stephen Hollis Vice President Construction, Western Region Project No.: 20G192-5 Subject: Results of Additional Infiltration Testing West Valley Logistics Center NEC Locust Avenue and 11th Street Fontana, California References: Geotechnical Investigation, West Valley Logistics Center, Armstrong Road at Locust Avenue, Fontana, California, prepared by Southern California Geotechnical, Inc. (SCG) for IDI Logistics, SCG Project No. 20G192-2, dated March 18, 2021. Results of Infiltration Testing, West Valley Logistics Center, Armstrong Road at Locust Avenue, Fontana, California, prepared by SCG, prepared for IDI Logistics, SCG Project No. 20G192-3, dated March 24, 2021. Mr. Hollis: In accordance with your request, we have performed additional infiltration testing at the subject site. The infiltration testing was performed for the proposed stormwater disposal bain that will be utilized at the subject site. We are pleased to present this report summarizing the results of the infiltration testing and our design recommendations. Scope of Services The scope of services performed for this project was in general accordance with our Change Order No. 20G192-CO4, dated May 21, 2021. The scope of services included visual site reconnaissance, subsurface exploration, field testing, and engineering analysis to determine the infiltration rates of the on-site soils for the stormwater disposal system. Double-Ring infiltration tests, at depths of 5± feet, were performed in order to analyze the infiltration characteristics of shallow soils. The shallow infiltration testing was performed in accordance with the ASTM test method D-3385-03, Standard Test Method for Infiltration Rate of Soils in Field Using Double- Ring Infiltrometer. The deep infiltration testing was performed using a constant-head infiltration test. Site and Project Description The overall site is located in the southeastern portion of the city of Fontana in San Bernardino County, California. The overall site is located on the west side of Locust Avenue at the 8th Street terminus. However, the subject site for this investigation is located at the northeast corner of West Valley Logistics Center – Fontana, CA Project No. 20G192-5 Page 2 Locust Avenue and 11th Street in Fontana, California. The subject site is bounded to the north by a vacant lot, to the west by Locust Avenue, to the south by 11th Street, and to the east by a vacant lot. The general locations of the overall site and the subject site are illustrated on the Site Location Map, included as Plate 1 of this report. The overall subject site consists of several rectangular- to irregular-shaped parcels which total 211.50± acres in size. The subject site consists of a trapezoidal-shaped parcel 8± acres in size located at the northeast corner of Locust Avenue and 11th Street. The subject site is currently developed as a detention basin. The bottom of the existing basin ranges from 7 to 25± feet below the surrounding site grades. The ascending slopes around the perimeter of the basin range from 7 to 25± feet in height with inclinations of 2.5h:1v. The ground surface cover consists of exposed soil. Detailed topographic information was obtained from a conceptual grading plan prepared by Thienes Engineering, Inc. Based on this plan, the topography of the subject site ranges from 1014± feet mean sea level (msl) in the northwestern corner of the site to 982.7± feet msl in the bottom of the basin. Proposed Development Based on the conceptual grading plan that was provided to our office by Thienes Engineering, Inc., the site will be used for stormwater disposal. The infiltration system will consist of a detention basin in combination with dry wells. The detention basin will be extended up to 5± feet below the bottom of the existing basin and the dry wells could extend to depths of 20 to 50± feet below the bottom of the basin. Previous Studies SCG previously performed a geotechnical investigation at the subject site: Geotechnical Investigation, West Valley Logistics Center, Armstrong Road at Locust Avenue, Fontana, California, prepared by SCG, prepared for IDI Logistics, SCG Project No. 20G192-2 dated March 18, 2018. As a part of this study, twenty-one (21) borings were advanced to depths of 20 to 50± feet below existing site grades. In addition to the borings, twenty (20) exploratory trenches were excavated to depths of 6 to 34± feet below existing site grades. Undocumented artificial fill soils were at Boring Nos. B-6 and B-10. The undocumented fill soils generally extend to depths less than 10± feet. The undocumented fill soils generally consist of well graded sands and gravels with occasional cobbles, as well as areas of silty sands and sandy silts. Native alluvium covers most of the site, particularly within the lower elevations. The alluvium typically consists of loose to dense silty sands, sandy silts and well-graded sands with variable amounts of gravel. Tonalite and quartz diorite bedrock has been mapped along the hillsides in the northern and southeastern portions of the project, as well as the northeastern corner of proposed Building 6. It should be noted that tonalite and quartz diorite can be used interchangeably. For the purposes of this report, we will refer to this bedrock unit as tonalite. Tonalite also underlies the alluvium at many of the boring locations. As encountered at the boring locations, the tonalite is typically medium to coarse grained, massive and weathered in the near-surface, becoming West Valley Logistics Center – Fontana, CA Project No. 20G192-5 Page 3 dense to very dense at depth. Many of the borings encountered auger refusal within this unit. Schist bedrock was encountered beneath the alluvium of Trench No. T-10, extending to depth of 35± feet below ground surface. The schist generally consists of layers of biotite schist and limited areas of quartzite. Leighton also mapped schist in the hills on the west side of the project. The rock is weathered in the near surface, but very dense and hard at depth. Southern California Geotechnical, Inc. (SCG) also previously performed an infiltration study at the site: Results of Infiltration Testing, West Valley Logistics Center, Armstrong Road at Locust Avenue, Fontana, California, prepared by SCG, prepared for IDI Logistics, SCG Project No. 20G192-3, dated March 24, 2021 As part of this investigation, twenty-five (25) infiltration test borings (identified as Infiltration Nos. I-1 to I-25), were advanced to depths of 2 to 33± feet within the areas of proposed infiltration systems. Undocumented artificial fill soils were encountered at Infiltration Boring Nos. I-4, I-5 and I-6, extending to depths of up to 4± feet. The undocumented fill soils generally consisted of silty sands and gravels, as well as areas of sandy silts. Native alluvial soils were encountered beneath the fill soils and at the ground surface at the infiltration boring locations, extending to at least the maximum depth explored of 33± feet below existing site grades. The alluvial soils consisted of loose to dense silty sands, sandy silts and well-graded sands with variable amounts of gravel. The Boring Logs, which illustrate the conditions encountered at the boring locations, are included with this report. Based on the test results the infiltration rates at the test locations ranged from 0.2 to 20.9 inches per hour. SCG recommended infiltration rates ranging from 0.4 to 20.0 inches per hour for the eleven infiltration systems. Groundwater During our current and previous studies, groundwater was not encountered within any of the borings or trenches during excavation. Based on the apparent moistures observed within the borings and trenches, the static groundwater table is considered to have existed at a depth in excess of 60± feet below existing site grades at the time of the subsurface investigation. Recent water level data was obtained from the California State Water Resources Control Board, GeoTracker, website, http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/. The nearest monitoring well on record is located approximately 100 feet east of Site 3. Water level readings within this monitoring well indicate a groundwater level of 105± feet below the ground surface in October 2019. Subsurface Exploration Scope of Exploration The subsurface exploration performed for the infiltration testing consisted of four (4) backhoe- excavated infiltration trenches extending to depths of 5± feet. The trenches were logged during West Valley Logistics Center – Fontana, CA Project No. 20G192-5 Page 4 excavation by a member of our staff. In addition, two (2) deep infiltration test borings were advanced to depths of 21½ and 51½± feet below the existing site grades. The infiltration borings were advanced using a truck-mounted drilling rig, equipped with 8-inch diameter hollow stem augers and were logged during drilling by a member of our staff. The approximate locations of the infiltration trenches (identified as Infiltration Test Nos. I-28 through I-31) and infiltration borings (identified as Infiltration Boring Nos. I-26 and I-27) are indicated on the Infiltration Test Location Plan, enclosed as Plate 2 of this report. Upon the completion of the infiltration test borings, the bottom of each test boring was covered with 2± inches of clean ¾-inch gravel. A sufficient length of 3-inch-diameter perforated PVC casing was then placed into each test hole so that the PVC casing extended from the bottom of the test hole to the ground surface. Clean ¾-inch gravel was installed in the annulus surrounding the PVC casing. Geotechnical Conditions Native alluvial soils encountered at the ground surface at all of the infiltration test locations. The near-surface soils consist of dense gravelly fine to coarse sands and fine to coarse sands with occasional cobbles extending to depths of 22± feet. At greater depths, the alluvium consists of medium dense to dense fine sandy silts to silty fine sands and fine to medium sands extending to at least the maximum depth explored of 51½± feet. Groundwater was not encountered during the drilling of the infiltration borings or excavation of the infiltration trenches. Therefore, the depth to static groundwater was considered to be greater than 51½± feet below the existing site grades at the time of the exploration. As previously stated, our research indicates that water level readings within the nearest monitoring well indicate a groundwater level of 105± feet below the ground surface in October 2019. Infiltration Testing Deep Infiltration Testing Procedure We understand that the results of the testing will be used to prepare a preliminary design for the dry well system that will be used at the subject site. Deep infiltration testing was performed at the Infiltration Test Boring Nos. I-26 and I-27. As previously mentioned, the infiltration testing was performed using a constant-head method. The pre-soaking process consisted of filling the test boring with water to approximately 10 feet below the ground surface. The pre-soaking was completed after all of the water had percolated through the test hole, at least 15 hours since initiating the pre-soak. SCG returned the following day to perform the infiltration testing. The infiltration test boring was filled with water to a depth of 10± feet below the existing site grades (41± feet and 11± feet, respectively, above the bottom of the test hole). Once the hole was filled, the inflow of water was controlled via a ball valve in order to maintain the water level constant at 10± feet below ground surface. It was necessary to constantly monitor this depth due to varying inflows from the water source and the change in infiltration rate with time. Readings were taken every ten minutes at Boring Nos. I-26 and I-27, using a water level meter and flow meter. The ball valve was used to make adjustments by increasing or decreasing the inflow of water when slight changes in depth West Valley Logistics Center – Fontana, CA Project No. 20G192-5 Page 5 occurred. The water level readings are presented on the spreadsheets enclosed with this report. The infiltration rates for each of the timed intervals are also tabulated on the spreadsheets. The infiltration rates for this test is tabulated in gallons per square foot per day. In accordance with the typically accepted practice, it is recommended that the most conservative reading from the latter part of the infiltration tests be used for design. The rate is summarized below: Infiltration Test No. Depth (feet) Soil Description Infiltration Rate (gal/ft2/day) I-26 50 Brown fine to medium Sand, little Silt 15.8 I-27 20 Brown Gravelly fine to coarse Sand, trace fine Silt 155.5 Shallow Infiltration Testing Procedure We understand that the results of the testing will be used to prepare a preliminary design for the storm water infiltration system that will be used at the subject site. As previously mentioned, the shallow infiltration testing was performed in general accordance with ASTM Test Method D-3385-03, Standard Test Method for Infiltration Rate of Soils in Field Using Double Ring Infiltrometer. Shallow infiltration testing was performed at all of the trench locations (I-28 through I-31). The infiltration testing consisted of filling the inner ring and the annular space (the space between the inner and outer rings) with water, approximately 3 to 4 inches above the soil. To prevent the flow of water from one ring to the other, the water level in both the inner ring and the annular space between the rings was maintained using constant-head float valves. The volume of water that was added to maintain a constant head in the inner ring and the annular space during each time interval was determined and recorded. A cap was placed over the rings to minimize the evaporation of water during the tests. The schedule for readings was determined based on the observed soil type at the base of each backhoe-excavated trench. Based on the existing soils at the trench locations, the volumetric measurements were made at 1-minute increments. The water volume measurements are presented on the spreadsheets enclosed with this report. The infiltration rates for each of the timed intervals are also tabulated on these spreadsheets. The infiltration rates for the infiltration tests are calculated in centimeters per hour and then converted to inches per hour. In accordance with the typically accepted practice, it is recommended that the most conservative reading from the latter part of the infiltration tests be used for design. The rates are summarized below: West Valley Logistics Center – Fontana, CA Project No. 20G192-5 Page 6 Infiltration Test No. Depth (feet) Soil Description Infiltration Rate (inches/hour) I-28 5 Brown fine to coarse Sand, little fine Gravel 20.0 I-29 5 Brown Gravelly fine to coarse Sand 19.8 I-30 5 Brown fine to coarse Sandy Gravel 18.1 I-31 5 Brown Gravelly fine to coarse Sand 20.7 Laboratory Testing Moisture Content The moisture contents for the recovered soil samples within the borings and trenches were determined in accordance with ASTM D-2216 and are expressed as a percentage of the dry weight. These test results are presented on the Boring and Trench Logs. Grain Size Analysis The grain size distribution of selected soils collected from each infiltration test boring and trench have been determined using a range of wire mesh screens. These tests were performed in general accordance with ASTM D-422 and/or ASTM D-1140. The weight of the portion of the sample retained on each screen is recorded and the percentage finer or coarser of the total weight is calculated. The results of these tests are presented on Plates C-1 through C-14 of this report. Design Recommendations Infiltration Basin Four (4) shallow infiltration tests were performed at the subject site. As noted above, the infiltration rates at these locations range from 18.1 to 20.7 inches per hour. Based on these test results, we recommend an infiltration rate of 18 inches per hour to be utilized for the infiltration basin at a depth of 5 feet. Dry Well Infiltration System Two (2) deep infiltration tests were performed at the subject site using a constant head test method. The major factor affecting the infiltration rate in these borings is the presence of silt at depths greater than 20± feet. Based on the infiltration results, the recommended infiltration rates are below: West Valley Logistics Center – Fontana, CA Project No. 20G192-5 Page 7 Dry Well Depths Design Infiltration Rate (gal/ft²/day) Up to 20 feet 155 Between 20 and 50 feet 15 General The design of the proposed storm water infiltration system should be performed by the project civil engineer, in accordance with the City of Fontana and/or County of San Bernardino guidelines. However, it is recommended that the system be constructed so as to facilitate removal of silt and clay, or other deleterious materials from any water that may enter the system. The presence of such materials would decrease the effective infiltration rate. It is recommended that the project civil engineer apply an appropriate factor of safety. The infiltration rates recommended above are based on the assumption that only clean water will be introduced to the subsurface profile. Any fines, debris, or organic materials could significantly impact the infiltration rates. It should be noted that the recommended infiltration rates are based on infiltration testing at four (4) discrete locations and the overall infiltration rates of the storm water infiltration systems could vary considerably. Infiltration Rate Considerations The infiltration rates presented herein was determined in accordance with the current standard of practice and are considered valid only for the time and place of the actual test. Varying subsurface conditions will exist in other areas of the site, which could alter the recommended infiltration rates presented above. The infiltration rates will decline over time between maintenance cycles as silt or clay particles accumulate on the BMP surface. The infiltration rate is highly dependent upon a number of factors, including density, silt and clay content, grainsize distribution throughout the range of particle sizes, and particle shape. Small changes in these factors can cause large changes in the infiltration rates. Infiltration rates are based on unsaturated flow. As water is introduced into soils by infiltration, the soils become saturated and the wetting front advances from the unsaturated zone to the saturated zone. Once the soils become saturated, infiltration rates become zero, and water can only move through soils by hydraulic conductivity at a rate determined by pressure head and soil permeability. Changes in soil moisture content will affect the infiltration rate. Infiltration rates should be expected to decrease until the soils become saturated. Soil permeability values will then govern groundwater movement. Permeability values may be on the order of 10 to 20 times less than infiltration rates. The system designer should incorporate adequate factors of safety and allow for overflow design into appropriate traditional storm drain systems, which would transport storm water off-site. Construction Considerations The infiltration rates presented in this report are specific to the tested locations and tested depths. Infiltration rates can be significantly reduced if the soils are exposed to excessive disturbance or compaction during construction. Compaction of the soils at the bottom of the infiltration system can significantly reduce the infiltration ability of the basin. Therefore, the subgrade soils within proposed infiltration system areas should not be over-excavated, undercut or compacted in any West Valley Logistics Center – Fontana, CA Project No. 20G192-5 Page 8 significant manner. It is recommended that a note to this effect be added to the project plans and/or specifications. We recommend that a representative from the geotechnical engineer be on-site during the construction of the proposed infiltration systems to identify the soil classification at the base of each system. It should be confirmed that the soils at the base of the proposed infiltration systems correspond with those presented in this report to ensure that the performance of the systems will be consistent with the rates reported herein. We recommend that scrapers and other rubber-tired heavy equipment not be operated on the basin bottom, or at levels lower than 2 feet above the bottom of the system, particularly within basins. As such, the bottom 24 inches of the infiltration systems should be excavated with non-rubber-tired equipment, such as excavators. Basin Maintenance The proposed project may include infiltration basins. Water flowing into these basins will carry some level of sediment. Wind-blown sediments and erosion of the basin side walls will also contribute to sediment deposition at the bottom of the basin. This layer has the potential to significantly reduce the infiltration rate of the basin subgrade soils. Therefore, a formal basin maintenance program should be established to ensure that these silt and clay deposits are removed from the basin on a regular basis. Appropriate vegetation on the basin sidewalls and bottom may reduce erosion and sediment deposition. Basin maintenance should also include measures to prevent animal burrows, and to repair any burrows or damage caused by such. Animal burrows in the basin sidewalls can significantly increase the risk of erosion and piping failures. Location of Infiltration Systems The use of on-site storm water infiltration systems carries a risk of creating adverse geotechnical conditions. Increasing the moisture content of the soil can cause the soil to lose internal shear strength and increase its compressibility, resulting in a change in the designed engineering properties. Overlying structures and pavements in the infiltration area could potentially be damaged due to saturation of the subgrade soils. The proposed infiltration systems for this site should be located at least 25 feet away from any structures, including retaining walls. Even with this provision of locating the infiltration system at least 25 feet from the building(s), it is possible that infiltrating water into the subsurface soils could have an adverse effect on the proposed or existing structures. It should also be noted that utility trenches which happen to collect storm water can also serve as conduits to transmit storm water toward the structure, depending on the slope of the utility trench. Therefore, consideration should also be given to the proposed locations of underground utilities which may pass near the proposed infiltration system. The infiltration system designer should also give special consideration to the effect that the proposed infiltration systems may have on nearby subterranean structures, open excavations, or descending slopes. In particular, infiltration systems should not be located near the crest of descending slopes, particularly where the slopes are comprised of granular soils. Such systems will require specialized design and analysis to evaluate the potential for slope instability, piping failures and other phenomena that typically apply to earthen dam design. This type of analysis is beyond West Valley Logistics Center – Fontana, CA Project No. 20G192-5 Page 9 the scope of this infiltration test report, but these factors should be considered by the infiltration system designer when locating the infiltration systems. General Comments This report has been prepared as an instrument of service for use by the client in order to aid in the evaluation of this property and to assist the architects and engineers in the design and preparation of the project plans and specifications. This report may be provided to the contractor(s) and other design consultants to disclose information relative to the project. However, this report is not intended to be utilized as a specification in and of itself, without appropriate interpretation by the project architect, structural engineer, and/or civil engineer. The design of the infiltration system is the responsibility of the civil engineer. The role of the geotechnical engineer is limited to determination of infiltration rate only. By using the design infiltration rates contained herein, the civil engineer agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the geotechnical engineer for all aspects of the design and performance of the infiltration system. The reproduction and distribution of this report must be authorized by the client and Southern California Geotechnical, Inc. Furthermore, any reliance on this report by an unauthorized third party is at such party’s sole risk, and we accept no responsibility for damage or loss which may occur. The analysis of this site was based on a subsurface profile interpolated from limited discrete soil samples. While the materials encountered in the project area are considered to be representative of the total area, some variations should be expected between trench locations and testing depths. If the conditions encountered during construction vary significantly from those detailed herein, we should be contacted immediately to determine if the conditions alter the recommendations contained herein. This report has been based on assumed or provided characteristics of the proposed development. It is recommended that the owner, client, architect, structural engineer, and civil engineer carefully review these assumptions to ensure that they are consistent with the characteristics of the proposed development. If discrepancies exist, they should be brought to our attention to verify that they do not affect the conclusions and recommendations contained herein. We also recommend that the project plans and specifications be submitted to our office for review to verify that our recommendations have been correctly interpreted. The analysis, conclusions, and recommendations contained within this report have been promulgated in accordance with generally accepted professional geotechnical engineering practice. No other warranty is implied or expressed. West Valley Logistics Center – Fontana, CA Project No. 20G192-5 Page 10 Closure We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. We look forward to providing additional consulting services during the course of the project. If we may be of further assistance in any manner, please contact our office. Respectfully Submitted, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Daryl Kas, CEG 2467 Senior Geologist Gregory K. Mitchell, GE 2364 Principal Engineer Distribution: (1) Addressee Enclosures: Plate 1 - Site Location Map Plate 2 - Infiltration Test Location Plan Boring Log Legend and Logs (5 pages) Trench Logs (4 pages) Infiltration Test Results Spreadsheets (6 pages) Grain Size Distribution Graphs (14 pages) SITE SITESUBJE C T OV E R A L L SIT E OVE R A L L WEST VALLEY LOGISTICS CENTER SCALE: 1" = 2000' DRAWN: DRK CHKD: GKM SCG PROJECT 20G192-5 PLATE 1 SITE LOCATION MAP FONTANA, CALIFORNIA SOURCE: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF THE FONTANA QUADRANGLE, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, 2018 I-26I-27I-28I-29I-30I-3111TH STREETLOCUST AVENUE SCALE: 1" = 80'DRAWN: DRKCHKD: GKMPLATE 2SCG PROJECT20G192-5FONTANA, CALIFORNIAWEST VALLEY LOGISTICS CENTERINFILTRATION TEST LOCATION PLANNORTH SoCalGeoAPPROXIMATE INFILTRATION BORING LOCATIONAPPROXIMATE INFILTRATION TRENCH LOCATION GEOTECHNICAL LEGEND BORING LOG LEGEND SAMPLE TYPE GRAPHICAL SYMBOL SAMPLE DESCRIPTION AUGER SAMPLE COLLECTED FROM AUGER CUTTINGS, NO FIELD MEASUREMENT OF SOIL STRENGTH. (DISTURBED) CORE ROCK CORE SAMPLE: TYPICALLY TAKEN WITH A DIAMOND-TIPPED CORE BARREL. TYPICALLY USED ONLY IN HIGHLY CONSOLIDATED BEDROCK. GRAB 1 SOIL SAMPLE TAKEN WITH NO SPECIALIZED EQUIPMENT, SUCH AS FROM A STOCKPILE OR THE GROUND SURFACE. (DISTURBED) CS CALIFORNIA SAMPLER: 2-1/2 INCH I.D. SPLIT BARREL SAMPLER, LINED WITH 1-INCH HIGH BRASS RINGS. DRIVEN WITH SPT HAMMER. (RELATIVELY UNDISTURBED) NSR NO RECOVERY: THE SAMPLING ATTEMPT DID NOT RESULT IN RECOVERY OF ANY SIGNIFICANT SOIL OR ROCK MATERIAL. SPT STANDARD PENETRATION TEST: SAMPLER IS A 1.4 INCH INSIDE DIAMETER SPLIT BARREL, DRIVEN 18 INCHES WITH THE SPT HAMMER. (DISTURBED) SH SHELBY TUBE: TAKEN WITH A THIN WALL SAMPLE TUBE, PUSHED INTO THE SOIL AND THEN EXTRACTED. (UNDISTURBED) VANE VANE SHEAR TEST: SOIL STRENGTH OBTAINED USING A 4 BLADED SHEAR DEVICE. TYPICALLY USED IN SOFT CLAYS-NO SAMPLE RECOVERED. COLUMN DESCRIPTIONS DEPTH: Distance in feet below the ground surface. SAMPLE: Sample Type as depicted above. BLOW COUNT: Number of blows required to advance the sampler 12 inches using a 140 lb hammer with a 30-inch drop. 50/3” indicates penetration refusal (>50 blows) at 3 inches. WH indicates that the weight of the hammer was sufficient to push the sampler 6 inches or more. POCKET PEN.: Approximate shear strength of a cohesive soil sample as measured by pocket penetrometer. GRAPHIC LOG: Graphic Soil Symbol as depicted on the following page. DRY DENSITY: Dry density of an undisturbed or relatively undisturbed sample in lbs/ft3. MOISTURE CONTENT: Moisture content of a soil sample, expressed as a percentage of the dry weight. LIQUID LIMIT: The moisture content above which a soil behaves as a liquid. PLASTIC LIMIT: The moisture content above which a soil behaves as a plastic. PASSING #200 SIEVE: The percentage of the sample finer than the #200 standard sieve. UNCONFINED SHEAR: The shear strength of a cohesive soil sample, as measured in the unconfined state. SM SP COARSE GRAINEDSOILS SW TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS WELL-GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NOFINES SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND - SILT MIXTURES LETTERGRAPH POORLY-GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND MIXTURES, LITTLEOR NO FINES GC GM GP GW POORLY-GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SAND, LITTLE OR NOFINES SILTSAND CLAYS MORE THAN 50% OF MATERIAL ISLARGER THANNO. 200 SIEVE SIZE MORE THAN 50%OF MATERIAL IS SMALLER THANNO. 200 SIEVESIZE MORE THAN 50%OF COARSEFRACTION PASSING ON NO.4 SIEVE MORE THAN 50%OF COARSE FRACTIONRETAINED ON NO.4 SIEVE CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND - CLAY MIXTURES FINEGRAINED SOILS SYMBOLSMAJOR DIVISIONS SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART PT OH CH MH OL CL ML CLEAN SANDS SC SILTY SANDS, SAND - SILTMIXTURES CLAYEY SANDS, SAND - CLAY MIXTURES INORGANIC SILTS AND VERY FINESANDS, ROCK FLOUR, SILTY OR CLAYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEYSILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY, GRAVELLYCLAYS, SANDY CLAYS, SILTY CLAYS,LEAN CLAYS ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANICSILTY CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS FINE SAND ORSILTY SOILS INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY, ORGANIC SILTS PEAT, HUMUS, SWAMP SOILS WITHHIGH ORGANIC CONTENTS SILTS AND CLAYS GRAVELS WITH FINES SAND AND SANDY SOILS (LITTLE OR NO FINES) SANDS WITH FINES LIQUID LIMITLESS THAN 50 LIQUID LIMIT GREATER THAN 50 HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS NOTE: DUAL SYMBOLS ARE USED TO INDICATE BORDERLINE SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS GRAVEL AND GRAVELLYSOILS (APPRECIABLE AMOUNT OF FINES) (APPRECIABLE AMOUNT OF FINES) (LITTLE OR NO FINES) WELL-GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLYSANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES CLEAN GRAVELS 46 41 51 39 24 30 5 4 48 56 3 2 3 3 20 11 ALLUVIUM: Brown Gravelly fine to coarse Sand, dense-dry to damp Gray Brown fine to coarse Sand, dense to very dense-dry to damp @ 20', trace fine Gravel Gray Brown fine Sandy Silt to Silty fine Sand, medium dense-very moist Brown Silty fine to medium Sandy Silt, dense-moist Brown fine Sandy Silt, trace medium Sand, dense-dampBLOW COUNTDRY DENSITY(PCF)DEPTH (FEET)MOISTURECONTENT (%)JOB NO.: 20G192-5 PROJECT: West Valley Logistics Center LOCATION: Fontana, California PLATE B-1a 5 10 15 20 25 30 DESCRIPTION SURFACE ELEVATION: --- MSL LIQUIDLIMITPLASTICLIMITSAMPLEFIELD RESULTS GRAPHIC LOGPOCKET PEN.(TSF)DRILLING DATE: 6/1/21 DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger LOGGED BY: Daryl Kas ORGANICCONTENT (%)WATER DEPTH: --- CAVE DEPTH: --- READING TAKEN: At Completion LABORATORY RESULTS COMMENTSPASSING#200 SIEVE (%)TEST BORING LOG BORING NO. I-26 TBL 20G192-5 BORINGS.GPJ SOCALGEO.GDT 6/25/21 30 37 47 86 77 36 16 13 10 12 9 8 Brown fine Sandy Silt, trace medium Sand, dense-damp Brown Silty fine to medium Sand, dense-moist Brown fine to medium Sand, little Silt, dense to very dense-damp to moist Boring Terminated at 51½ feetBLOW COUNTDRY DENSITY(PCF)DEPTH (FEET)MOISTURECONTENT (%)JOB NO.: 20G192-5 PROJECT: West Valley Logistics Center LOCATION: Fontana, California PLATE B-1b 40 45 50 DESCRIPTION (Continued)LIQUIDLIMITPLASTICLIMITSAMPLEFIELD RESULTS GRAPHIC LOGPOCKET PEN.(TSF)DRILLING DATE: 6/1/21 DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger LOGGED BY: Daryl Kas ORGANICCONTENT (%)WATER DEPTH: --- CAVE DEPTH: --- READING TAKEN: At Completion LABORATORY RESULTS COMMENTSPASSING#200 SIEVE (%)TEST BORING LOG BORING NO. I-26 TBL 20G192-5 BORINGS.GPJ SOCALGEO.GDT 6/25/21 79 42 50 36 5 8 2 4 4 4 ALLUVIUM: Gray Brown Gravelly fine to coarse Sand, dense to very dense-dry to damp Brown fine to coarse Sand, trace fine Gravel, dense to very dense-damp Brown Gravelly fine to coarse Sand, trace Silt, dense-damp Boring Terminated at 21½'BLOW COUNTDRY DENSITY(PCF)DEPTH (FEET)MOISTURECONTENT (%)JOB NO.: 20G192-5 PROJECT: West Valley Logistics Center LOCATION: Fontana, California PLATE B-2 5 10 15 20 DESCRIPTION SURFACE ELEVATION: --- MSL LIQUIDLIMITPLASTICLIMITSAMPLEFIELD RESULTS GRAPHIC LOGPOCKET PEN.(TSF)DRILLING DATE: 6/1/21 DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger LOGGED BY: Daryl Kas ORGANICCONTENT (%)WATER DEPTH: --- CAVE DEPTH: --- READING TAKEN: At Completion LABORATORY RESULTS COMMENTSPASSING#200 SIEVE (%)TEST BORING LOG BORING NO. I-27 TBL 20G192-5 BORINGS.GPJ SOCALGEO.GDT 6/25/21 312 ALLUVIUM: Light Gray Gravelly fine to coarse Sand, loose-dry Brown fine to coarse Sand, little fine Gravel, occasional Cobbles, loose-moist to very moist Trench Terminated at 5' SURFACE ELEVATION: --- MSL LIQUIDLIMITPLASTICLIMITSAMPLEFIELD RESULTS WATER DEPTH: --- CAVE DEPTH: --- READING TAKEN: At Completion DRY DENSITY(PCF)DESCRIPTION TRENCH NO. I-28 DEPTH (FEET)MOISTURECONTENT (%)JOB NO.: 20G192-5 PROJECT: West Valley Logistics Center LOCATION: Fontana, California PLATE B-3 5 GRAPHIC LOGPOCKET PEN.(TSF)TEST BORING LOG ORGANICCONTENT (%)LABORATORY RESULTS COMMENTSEXCAVATION DATE: 6/2/21 EXCAVATION METHOD: Backhoe LOGGED BY: Caleb Brackett PASSING#200 SIEVE (%)BLOW COUNTTBL 20G192-5 TRENCHES.GPJ SOCALGEO.GDT 6/25/21 25 ALLUVIUM: Light Brown Silty fine Sand, trace fine root fibers, medium dense-dry Gray Gravelly fine to coarse Sand, occasional Cobbles, loose-damp TrenchTerminated at 5' SURFACE ELEVATION: --- MSL LIQUIDLIMITPLASTICLIMITSAMPLEFIELD RESULTS WATER DEPTH: --- CAVE DEPTH: --- READING TAKEN: At Completion DRY DENSITY(PCF)DESCRIPTION TRENCH NO. I-29 DEPTH (FEET)MOISTURECONTENT (%)JOB NO.: 20G192-5 PROJECT: West Valley Logistics Center LOCATION: Fontana, California PLATE B-4 5 GRAPHIC LOGPOCKET PEN.(TSF)TEST BORING LOG ORGANICCONTENT (%)LABORATORY RESULTS COMMENTSEXCAVATION DATE: 6/2/21 EXCAVATION METHOD: Backhoe LOGGED BY: Caleb Brackett PASSING#200 SIEVE (%)BLOW COUNTTBL 20G192-5 TRENCHES.GPJ SOCALGEO.GDT 6/25/21 27 ALLUVIUM: Light Brown Silty fine Sand, trace fine root fibers, medium dense-dry Gray Brown Gravelly fine to coarse Sand, occasional Cobbles, medium dense-damp Brown fine to coarse Sandy Gravel, occasional Cobbles, medium dense-damp Boring Terminated at 5' SURFACE ELEVATION: --- MSL LIQUIDLIMITPLASTICLIMITSAMPLEFIELD RESULTS WATER DEPTH: --- CAVE DEPTH: --- READING TAKEN: At Completion DRY DENSITY(PCF)DESCRIPTION TRENCH NO. I-30 DEPTH (FEET)MOISTURECONTENT (%)JOB NO.: 20G192-5 PROJECT: West Valley Logistics Center LOCATION: Fontana, California PLATE B-5 5 GRAPHIC LOGPOCKET PEN.(TSF)TEST BORING LOG ORGANICCONTENT (%)LABORATORY RESULTS COMMENTSEXCAVATION DATE: 6/2/21 EXCAVATION METHOD: Backhoe LOGGED BY: Caleb Brackett PASSING#200 SIEVE (%)BLOW COUNTTBL 20G192-5 TRENCHES.GPJ SOCALGEO.GDT 6/25/21 42 ALLUVIUM: Light Brown Silty fine Sand, trace fine root fibers, loose-dry Gray Gravelly fine to coarse Sand, occasional Cobbles, medium dense-dry Boring Terminated at 5' SURFACE ELEVATION: --- MSL LIQUIDLIMITPLASTICLIMITSAMPLEFIELD RESULTS WATER DEPTH: --- CAVE DEPTH: --- READING TAKEN: At Completion DRY DENSITY(PCF)DESCRIPTION TRENCH NO. I-31 DEPTH (FEET)MOISTURECONTENT (%)JOB NO.: 20G192-5 PROJECT: West Valley Logistics Center LOCATION: Fontana, California PLATE B-6 5 GRAPHIC LOGPOCKET PEN.(TSF)TEST BORING LOG ORGANICCONTENT (%)LABORATORY RESULTS COMMENTSEXCAVATION DATE: 6/2/21 EXCAVATION METHOD: Backhoe LOGGED BY: Caleb Brackett PASSING#200 SIEVE (%)BLOW COUNTTBL 20G192-5 TRENCHES.GPJ SOCALGEO.GDT 6/25/21 INFILTRATION CALCULATIONS Project Name West Valley Logistics Center Project Location Project Number Engineer Borehole Diameter 8 Borehole Depth 51.5 Water Depth from Ground Surface 10 Percolation Boring No.I-26 IntervalNumberTimeTimeInterval(hrs)AvergaeWettedDepthforInterval(ft)InflowMeterReadings(gallons)VolumeofOutflow(gallons)PercolationRateQ(gallons/minute)PercolationRateQ(gal/ft2/day)Initial 9:58 AM 655.2 Final 10:08 AM 662.3 Initial 10:08 AM 662.3 Final 10:18 AM 670.2 Initial 10:18 AM 670.2 Final 10:28 AM 678.2 Initial 10:28 AM 678.2 Final 10:38 AM 687.4 Initial 10:38 AM 687.4 Final 10:48 AM 697.0 Initial 10:48 AM 697.0 Final 10:58 AM 706.9 Initial 10:38 AM 687.4 Final 10:48 AM 697.0 Initial 10:48 AM 697.0 Final 10:58 AM 706.9 7 0.1667 41.50 9.6 0.96 15.90 8 0.1667 41.50 6 0.1667 9.9 0.99 16.40 41.50 9.9 0.99 16.40 5 0.1667 41.50 9.6 0.96 15.90 4 0.1667 41.50 9.2 0.92 15.24 3 0.1667 41.50 8 0.80 13.25 7.1 0.71 11.76 2 0.1667 41.50 7.9 0.79 13.09 Fontana, California 20G192-5 OS 1 0.1667 41.50 INFILTRATION CALCULATIONS Project Name West Valley Logistics Center Project Location Project Number Engineer Borehole Diameter 8 Borehole Depth 21.5 Water Depth from Ground Surface 10 Percolation Boring No.I-27 IntervalNumberTimeTimeInterval(hrs)AvergaeWettedDepthforInterval(ft)InflowMeterReadings(gallons)VolumeofOutflow(gallons)PercolationRateQ(gallons/minute)PercolationRateQ(gal/ft2/day)Initial 9:58 AM 699.8 Final 10:08 AM 730.6 Initial 10:08 AM 730.6 Final 10:18 AM 762.0 Initial 10:18 AM 762.0 Final 10:28 AM 790.9 Initial 10:28 AM 790.9 Final 10:38 AM 819.0 Initial 10:38 AM 819.0 Final 10:48 AM 847.0 Initial 10:48 AM 847.0 Final 10:58 AM 875.0 Initial 10:58 AM 875.0 Final 11:08 AM 903.0 Initial 11:08 AM 903.0 Final 11:18 AM 929.7 Initial 11:18 AM 929.7 Final 11:28 AM 955.7 187.73 2.80 1 11.500.1667 184.1430.8 3 11.50 2 167.400.1667 0.1667 28 28 0.1667 28 2.80 2.80 4 11.50 168.000.1667 28.1 5 11.50 2.81 6 11.50 8 11.50 159.630.1667 26.7 2.67 7 11.50 9 11.50 155.450.1667 26 2.60 2.89 0.1667 31.411.50 172.780.1667 28.9 167.40 167.40 Fontana, California 20G192-5 OS 3.08 3.14 INFILTRATION CALCULATIONS Project Name West Valley Logistics Center Project Location Project Number Engineer Infiltration Test No I-28 Constants Diameter (ft) Area (ft2) Area (cm2) Inner 1 0.79 730 *Note: The infiltration rate was calculated Anlr. Space 2 2.36 2189 based on current time interval Interval Elapsed Inner Ring Ring Flow Annular Ring Space Flow Inner Ring* Annular Space* Inner Ring* Annular Space* (min) (ml)(cm3)(ml)(cm3)(cm/hr) (cm/hr) (in/hr) (in/hr) Initial 8:31 AM 5 0 0 Final 8:36 AM 5 3400 10000 Initial 8:36 AM 5 0 0 Final 8:41 AM 10 3500 10200 Initial 8:41 AM 5 0 0 Final 8:46 AM 15 3300 9900 Initial 8:46 AM 5 0 0 Final 8:51 AM 20 3100 10000 Initial 8:51 AM 5 0 0 Final 8:56 AM 25 3100 9600 Initial 8:56 AM 5 0 0 Final 9:01 AM 30 3050 9400 Initial 9:01 AM 5 0 0 Final 9:06 AM 35 3100 9500 20.50731009500 50.98 52.08 20.07 20.72 6 3050 9400 50.16 51.53 19.75 20.29 5 3100 9600 50.98 52.63 20.07 21.37 4 3100 10000 50.98 54.82 20.07 21.58 3 3300 9900 54.27 54.27 21.37 21.58 2 3500 10200 57.56 55.92 22.66 22.02 1 3400 10000 55.92 54.82 22.02 Fontana, CA 20G192-5 Caleb Brackett Flow Readings Infiltration Rates Test Interval Time (hr) INFILTRATION CALCULATIONS Project Name West Valley Logistics Center Project Location Project Number Engineer Infiltration Test No I-29 Constants Diameter (ft) Area (ft2) Area (cm2) Inner 1 0.79 730 *Note: The infiltration rate was calculated Anlr. Space 2 2.36 2189 based on current time interval Interval Elapsed Inner Ring Ring Flow Annular Ring Space Flow Inner Ring* Annular Space* Inner Ring* Annular Space* (min) (ml)(cm3)(ml)(cm3)(cm/hr) (cm/hr) (in/hr) (in/hr) Initial 9:55 AM 5 0 0 Final 10:00 AM 5 3500 10600 Initial 10:00 AM 5 0 0 Final 10:05 AM 10 3100 10600 Initial 10:05 AM 5 0 0 Final 10:10 AM 15 3200 10400 Initial 10:10 AM 5 0 0 Final 10:15 AM 20 3100 10400 Initial 10:15 AM 5 0 0 Final 10:20 AM 25 3400 10500 Initial 10:20 AM 5 0 0 Final 10:25 AM 30 3050 10200 Initial 10:25 AM 5 0 0 Final 10:30 AM 35 3100 10300 Initial 10:30 AM 5 0 0 Final 10:35 AM 40 3100 10200 Initial 10:35 AM 5 0 0 Final 10:40 AM 45 3150 10000 Initial 10:40 AM 5 0 0 Final 10:45 AM 50 3050 10100 21.58 10 3050 10100 50.16 55.37 19.75 21.80 9 3150 10000 51.81 54.82 20.40 22.23 8 3100 10200 50.98 55.92 20.07 22.02 7 3100 10300 50.98 56.47 20.07 22.66 6 3050 10200 50.16 55.92 19.75 22.02 5 3400 10500 55.92 57.56 22.02 22.45 4 3100 10400 50.98 57.01 20.07 22.45 3 3200 10400 52.63 57.01 20.72 22.88 2 3100 10600 50.98 58.11 20.07 22.88 1 3500 10600 57.56 58.11 22.66 Fontana, CA 20G192-5 Caleb Brackett Flow Readings Infiltration Rates Test Interval Time (hr) INFILTRATION CALCULATIONS Project Name West Valley Logistics Center Project Location Project Number Engineer Infiltration Test No I-30 Constants Diameter (ft) Area (ft2) Area (cm2) Inner 1 0.79 730 *Note: The infiltration rate was calculated Anlr. Space 2 2.36 2189 based on current time interval Interval Elapsed Inner Ring Ring Flow Annular Ring Space Flow Inner Ring* Annular Space* Inner Ring* Annular Space* (min) (ml)(cm3)(ml)(cm3)(cm/hr) (cm/hr) (in/hr) (in/hr) Initial 11:22 AM 5 0 0 Final 11:27 AM 5 2750 8900 Initial 11:27 AM 5 0 0 Final 11:32 AM 10 2850 8900 Initial 11:32 AM 5 0 0 Final 11:37 AM 15 2800 8800 Initial 11:37 AM 5 0 0 Final 11:42 AM 20 2700 8800 Initial 11:42 AM 5 0 0 Final 11:47 AM 25 2750 8900 Initial 11:47 AM 5 0 0 Final 11:52 AM 30 2800 8700 Initial 11:52 AM 5 0 0 Final 11:57 AM 35 2800 8800 Initial 11:57 AM 5 0 0 Final 12:02 PM 40 2750 8700 Initial 12:02 PM 5 0 0 Final 12:07 PM 45 2800 8800 Initial 12:07 PM 5 0 0 Final 12:12 PM 50 2800 8600 18.99 10 2800 8600 46.05 47.15 18.13 18.56 9 2800 8800 46.05 48.24 18.13 18.99 8 2750 8700 45.23 47.70 17.81 18.78 7 2800 8800 46.05 48.24 18.13 19.21 6 2800 8700 46.05 47.70 18.13 18.78 5 2750 8900 45.23 48.79 17.81 18.99 4 2700 8800 44.41 48.24 17.48 18.99 3 2800 8800 46.05 48.24 18.13 19.21 2 2850 8900 46.87 48.79 18.45 19.21 1 2750 8900 45.23 48.79 17.81 Fontana, CA 20G192-5 Caleb Brackett Flow Readings Infiltration Rates Test Interval Time (hr) INFILTRATION CALCULATIONS Project Name West Valley Logistics Center Project Location Project Number Engineer Infiltration Test No I-31 Constants Diameter (ft) Area (ft2) Area (cm2) Inner 1 0.79 730 *Note: The infiltration rate was calculated Anlr. Space 2 2.36 2189 based on current time interval Interval Elapsed Inner Ring Ring Flow Annular Ring Space Flow Inner Ring* Annular Space* Inner Ring* Annular Space* (min) (ml)(cm3)(ml)(cm3)(cm/hr) (cm/hr) (in/hr) (in/hr) Initial 10:45 AM 5 0 0 Final 10:50 AM 5 3450 10600 Initial 10:50 AM 5 0 0 Final 10:55 AM 10 3400 10800 Initial 10:55 AM 5 0 0 Final 11:00 AM 15 3400 10300 Initial 11:00 AM 5 0 0 Final 11:05 AM 20 3200 10400 Initial 11:05 AM 5 0 0 Final 11:10 AM 25 3300 10100 Initial 11:10 AM 5 0 0 Final 11:15 AM 30 3200 10200 Initial 11:15 AM 5 0 0 Final 11:20 AM 35 3200 10200 Initial 11:20 AM 5 0 0 Final 11:25 AM 40 3200 9800 Initial 11:25 AM 5 0 0 Final 11:30 AM 45 3300 9800 Initial 11:30 AM 5 0 0 Final 11:35 AM 50 3200 9600 21.15 10 3200 9600 52.63 52.63 20.72 20.72 9 3300 9800 54.27 53.73 21.37 22.02 8 3200 9800 52.63 53.73 20.72 21.15 7 3200 10200 52.63 55.92 20.72 21.80 6 3200 10200 52.63 55.92 20.72 22.02 5 3300 10100 54.27 55.37 21.37 22.23 4 3200 10400 52.63 57.01 20.72 22.45 3 3400 10300 55.92 56.47 22.02 22.88 2 3400 10800 55.92 59.21 22.02 23.31 1 3450 10600 56.74 58.11 22.34 Fontana, CA 20G192-5 Caleb Brackett Flow Readings Infiltration Rates Test Interval Time (hr) Sample Description I-26 @ 15' Soil Classification Gray Brown fine to coarse Sand West Valley Logistics Center Fontana, California Project No. 20G192-5 PLATE C- 1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0.0010.010.1110100PercentPassingbyWeight Grain Size in Millimeters Grain Size Distribution Sieve Analysis Hydrometer Analysis US Standard Sieve Sizes Coarse Gravel Fine Gravel Crs. Sand Med. Sand Fine Sand Fines (Silt and Clay) 2 1 3/4 1/2 3/8 1/4 #4 #8 #10 #16 #20 #30 #40 #50 #100 #200 Sample Description I-26 @ 20' Soil Classification Gray Brown fine to coarse Sand, trace fine Gravel West Valley Logistics Center Fontana, California Project No. 20G192-5 PLATE C- 2 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0.0010.010.1110100PercentPassingbyWeight Grain Size in Millimeters Grain Size Distribution Sieve Analysis Hydrometer Analysis US Standard Sieve Sizes Coarse Gravel Fine Gravel Crs. Sand Med. Sand Fine Sand Fines (Silt and Clay) 2 1 3/4 1/2 3/8 1/4 #4 #8 #10 #16 #20 #30 #40 #50 #100 #200 Sample Description I-26 @ 25' Soil Classification Gray Brown fine Sandy Silt to Silty fine Sand West Valley Logistics Center Fontana, California Project No. 20G192-5 PLATE C- 3 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0.0010.010.1110100PercentPassingbyWeight Grain Size in Millimeters Grain Size Distribution Sieve Analysis Hydrometer Analysis US Standard Sieve Sizes Coarse Gravel Fine Gravel Crs. Sand Med. Sand Fine Sand Fines (Silt and Clay) 2 1 3/4 1/2 3/8 1/4 #4 #8 #10 #16 #20 #30 #40 #50 #100 #200 Sample Description I-26 @ 30' Soil Classification Brown fine to medium Sandy Silt West Valley Logistics Center Fontana, California Project No. 20G192-5 PLATE C- 4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0.0010.010.1110100PercentPassingbyWeight Grain Size in Millimeters Grain Size Distribution Sieve Analysis Hydrometer Analysis US Standard Sieve Sizes Coarse Gravel Fine Gravel Crs. Sand Med. Sand Fine Sand Fines (Silt and Clay) 2 1 3/4 1/2 3/8 1/4 #4 #8 #10 #16 #20 #30 #40 #50 #100 #200 Sample Description I-26 @ 35' Soil Classification Brown fine Sandy Silt, trace medium Sand West Valley Logistics Center Fontana, California Project No. 20G192-5 PLATE C- 5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0.0010.010.1110100PercentPassingbyWeight Grain Size in Millimeters Grain Size Distribution Sieve Analysis Hydrometer Analysis US Standard Sieve Sizes Coarse Gravel Fine Gravel Crs. Sand Med. Sand Fine Sand Fines (Silt and Clay) 2 1 3/4 1/2 3/8 1/4 #4 #8 #10 #16 #20 #30 #40 #50 #100 #200 Sample Description I-26 @ 40' Soil Classification Brown Silty fine to medium Sand West Valley Logistics Center Fontana, California Project No. 20G192-5 PLATE C- 6 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0.0010.010.1110100PercentPassingbyWeight Grain Size in Millimeters Grain Size Distribution Sieve Analysis Hydrometer Analysis US Standard Sieve Sizes Coarse Gravel Fine Gravel Crs. Sand Med. Sand Fine Sand Fines (Silt and Clay) 2 1 3/4 1/2 3/8 1/4 #4 #8 #10 #16 #20 #30 #40 #50 #100 #200 Sample Description I-26 @ 45' Soil Classification Brown fine to medium Sand, little Silt West Valley Logistics Center Fontana, California Project No. 20G192-5 PLATE C- 7 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0.0010.010.1110100PercentPassingbyWeight Grain Size in Millimeters Grain Size Distribution Sieve Analysis Hydrometer Analysis US Standard Sieve Sizes Coarse Gravel Fine Gravel Crs. Sand Med. Sand Fine Sand Fines (Silt and Clay) 2 1 3/4 1/2 3/8 1/4 #4 #8 #10 #16 #20 #30 #40 #50 #100 #200 Sample Description I-26 @ 50' Soil Classification Brown fine to medium Sand, little Silt West Valley Logistics Center Fontana, California Project No. 20G192-5 PLATE C- 8 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0.0010.010.1110100PercentPassingbyWeight Grain Size in Millimeters Grain Size Distribution Sieve Analysis Hydrometer Analysis US Standard Sieve Sizes Coarse Gravel Fine Gravel Crs. Sand Med. Sand Fine Sand Fines (Silt and Clay) 2 1 3/4 1/2 3/8 1/4 #4 #8 #10 #16 #20 #30 #40 #50 #100 #200 Sample Description I-27 @ 15' Soil Classification Brown fine to coarse Sand, trace fine Gravel West Valley Logistics Center Fontana, California Project No. 20G192-5 PLATE C- 9 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0.0010.010.1110100PercentPassingbyWeight Grain Size in Millimeters Grain Size Distribution Sieve Analysis Hydrometer Analysis US Standard Sieve Sizes Coarse Gravel Fine Gravel Crs. Sand Med. Sand Fine Sand Fines (Silt and Clay) 2 1 3/4 1/2 3/8 1/4 #4 #8 #10 #16 #20 #30 #40 #50 #100 #200 Sample Description I-27 @ 20' Soil Classification Brown Gravelly fine to coarse Sand, trace Silt West Valley Logistics Center Fontana, California Project No. 20G192-5 PLATE C- 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0.0010.010.1110100PercentPassingbyWeight Grain Size in Millimeters Grain Size Distribution Sieve Analysis Hydrometer Analysis US Standard Sieve Sizes Coarse Gravel Fine Gravel Crs. Sand Med. Sand Fine Sand Fines (Silt and Clay) 2 1 3/4 1/2 3/8 1/4 #4 #8 #10 #16 #20 #30 #40 #50 #100 #200 Sample Description I-28 @ 5' Soil Classification Brown fine to coarse Sand, little fine Gravel West Valley Logistics Center Fontana, California Project No. 20G192-5 PLATE C- 11 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0.0010.010.1110100PercentPassingbyWeight Grain Size in Millimeters Grain Size Distribution Sieve Analysis Hydrometer Analysis US Standard Sieve Sizes Coarse Gravel Fine Gravel Crs. Sand Med. Sand Fine Sand Fines (Silt and Clay) 2 1 3/4 1/2 3/8 1/4 #4 #8 #10 #16 #20 #30 #40 #50 #100 #200 Sample Description I-29 @ 5' Soil Classification Brown Gravelly fine to coarse Sand West Valley Logistics Center Fontana, California Project No. 20G192-5 PLATE C- 12 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0.0010.010.1110100PercentPassingbyWeight Grain Size in Millimeters Grain Size Distribution Sieve Analysis Hydrometer Analysis US Standard Sieve Sizes Coarse Gravel Fine Gravel Crs. Sand Med. Sand Fine Sand Fines (Silt and Clay) 2 1 3/4 1/2 3/8 1/4 #4 #8 #10 #16 #20 #30 #40 #50 #100 #200 Sample Description I-30 @ 5' Soil Classification Brown fine to coarse Sandy Gravel West Valley Logistics Center Fontana, California Project No. 20G192-5 PLATE C- 13 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0.0010.010.1110100PercentPassingbyWeight Grain Size in Millimeters Grain Size Distribution Sieve Analysis Hydrometer Analysis US Standard Sieve Sizes Coarse Gravel Fine Gravel Crs. Sand Med. Sand Fine Sand Fines (Silt and Clay) 2 1 3/4 1/2 3/8 1/4 #4 #8 #10 #16 #20 #30 #40 #50 #100 #200 Sample Description I-31 @ 5' Soil Classification Brown Gravelly fine to coarse Sand West Valley Logistics Center Fontana, California Project No. 20G192-5 PLATE C- 14 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0.0010.010.1110100PercentPassingbyWeight Grain Size in Millimeters Grain Size Distribution Sieve Analysis Hydrometer Analysis US Standard Sieve Sizes Coarse Gravel Fine Gravel Crs. Sand Med. Sand Fine Sand Fines (Silt and Clay) 2 1 3/4 1/2 3/8 1/4 #4 #8 #10 #16 #20 #30 #40 #50 #100 #200 Attachment G HCOC Page 1 of 2Stormwater Facility Mapping2/7/2018http://permitrack.sbcounty.gov/wap/ 6/16/22, 12:21 PM 1/11 WQMP Project Report - San BernardImage Area of Interest (AOI) Information Area : 9,310,002.55 ft² Jun 16 2022 11:34:10 Pacific Daylight Time 6/16/22, 12:21 PM 2/11 Project Site Parcel Numbers #ParcelNumber Area(ft²) 1 025613113 7,719.36 2 025613110 17,138.92 3 025614139 88,549.39 4 025613114 179,695.41 5 025614138 298,421.93 6 025614137 307,559.95 7 025613112 374,980.75 8 025613105 432,808.05 9 025614136 678,267.84 10 025613115 789,702.57 11 019440105 1,279,021.45 12 025613111 1,582,098.39 13 019440109 3,131,464.44 HCOC Exempt Area #Type Status Area(ft²) 1 HCOC Exempt Areas Yes 9,310,002.55 Drainage Segment Details Thiessen Polygons #System Number Facility Name Closest channel segment’s susceptibility to Hydromodification Highest downstream hydromodification susceptibility Is this drainage segment subject to TMDLs? 1 2-124-1B Declez Channel EHM EHM No # Are there downstream drainage segments subject to TMDLs? Is this drainage segment a 303d listed stream? Are there 303d listed streams downstream?Area(ft²) 1 No No No 9,310,002.55 Onsite Soil Groups #Onsite Soils Group Soil Type Soil Type Abbreviation Area(ft²) 1 Soils - Hydro Group B Cr CIENEBA-ROCK OUTCROP COMPLEX B CIENEBA-ROCK OUTCROP 44,782.20 2 Soils - Hydro Group A GP QUARRIES AND PITS A QUARRIES AND PITS 167,754.37 3 Soils - Hydro Group B HaD HANFORD COARSE SANDY LOAM, 9 TO 15 PERCENT SL* HANFORD COARSE SANDY LOAM 193,006.84 4 Soils - Hydro Group B CnD CIENEBA SANDY LOAM, 9 TO 15 PERCENT SLOPES B CIENEBA SANDY LOAM 307,871.26 5 Soils - Hydro Group A TuB TUJUNGA LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 5 PERCENT SLOPES A TUJUNGA LOAMY SAND 989,616.14 6 Soils - Hydro Group A Db DELHI FINE SAND A DELHI FINE SAND 7,606,971.79 Delhi Sands 6/16/22, 12:21 PM 3/11 #Delhi Sands Area(ft²) 1 Yes 7,543,032.27 Delhi Sands within 200' #SANDFLY_HA SANDFLY__1 Area(ft²) 1 25 24 33,665.81 2 24 23 178,779.55 3 26 25 430,733.35 4 22 21 468,682.94 5 16 15 8,272,254.66 Desert Tortoise Habitat within 200' (ISP) #Category Area(ft²) 1 0 9,310,002.55 California Gnatcatcher #CNAME Area(ft²) 1 COASTAL CALIFORNIA GNATCATCHER 8,131,653.90 California Gnatcatcher within 200' #CNAME Area(ft²) 1 COASTAL CALIFORNIA GNATCATCHER 8,465,184.89 Potentially Sensitive Areas #Habitat Area(ft²) 1 Coastal Sage Scrub 3,742,979.31 Studies and Reports Related to Project Site 6/16/22, 12:21 PM 4/11 #Name Report PDF Name PDF Link Author Date_Source Area(ft²) 1 Chino_Basin_Re charge_Master_ Plan CBWM_Recharg eMasterPlan_lr.p df http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22CBWM_Rec hargeMasterPlan _lr%22%7D WE, Inc August 2001 WE, Inc 516,452.80 2 Chino_Basin_Wa ter_Master_32nd _Annual_Report CBWM_32ndAnn ualReport.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22CBWM_32n dAnnualReport% 22%7D Chino Basin Watermaster 2008-2009 Chino Basin Watermaster 516,452.80 3 SBCounty_CSD P_Project_No.2_ Volume_1 Volume 1.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22Volume_1% 22%7D Moffatt & Nichol March 1969 Moffatt & Nichol 4,753,076.56 4 SBCounty_CSD P_Project_No.2_ Volume_2 Volume 2.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22Volume_2% 22%7D Moffatt & Nichol March 1969 Moffatt & Nichol 4,753,076.56 5 Volume_2_Map Volume 2_Map.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22Volume_2_ Map%22%7D Moffatt & Nichol March 1969 Moffatt & Nichol 4,753,076.56 6/16/22, 12:21 PM 5/11 6 SBCounty_CSD P_Project_No.3_ Volume_I Volume I.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22Volume_I%2 2%7D Verpet Engineering Company May 1973 Verpet Engineering Company 4,753,076.56 7 SBCounty_CSD P_Project_No.3_ Volume_II Volume II.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22Volume_II% 22%7D Verpet Engineering Company May 1973 Verpet Engineering Company 4,753,076.56 8 CSDP_3- 3_Rialto_Channe l_Drainage_Area _Volume_I CSDP 3-3 - Volume I.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22CSDP_3-3_- _Volume_I%22% 7D James M. Montgomery April 1988 James M. Montgomery 6,262,334.98 9 CSDP_3- 3_Rialto_Channe l_Drainage_Area _Volume_II CSDP 3-3 - Volume II.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22CSDP_3-3_- _Volume_II%22 %7D James M. Montgomery April 1988 James M. Montgomery 6,262,334.98 10 CSDP_3- 3_Rialto_Channe l_Drainage_Area _Volume_III CSDP 3-3 - Volume III.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22CSDP_3-3_- _Volume_III%22 %7D James M. Montgomery April 1988 James M. Montgomery 6,262,334.98 6/16/22, 12:21 PM 6/11 11 CSDP_3- 3_Rialto_Channe l_Drainage_Area _Volume_I CSDP 3-3 RIALTO CHANNEL DRAINAGE AREA VOLI Rev.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22CSDP_3- 3_RIALTO_CHA NNEL_DRAINA GE_AREA_VOLI _Rev%22%7D James M. Montgomery April 1988 James M. Montgomery 6,262,334.98 12 CSDP_3- 3_Rialto_Channe l_Drainage_Area _Volume_IV CSDP 3-3 Rialto Channel Vol IV.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22CSDP_3- 3_Rialto_Channe l_Vol_IV%22%7 D James M. Montgomery April 1988 James M. Montgomery 6,262,334.98 13 CSDP_3- 3_Rialto_Channe l_Drainage_Area _Volume_V CSDP 3-3 Rialto Channel Vol V.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22CSDP_3- 3_Rialto_Channe l_Vol_V%22%7D James M. Montgomery April 1988 James M. Montgomery 6,262,334.98 14 CSDP_3- 3_Rialto_Channe l_Drain_Area_Dr aft Draft Project 3-3 Rialto Channel Drain Vol I.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22Draft_Projec t_3- 3_Rialto_Channe l_Drain_Vol_I%2 2%7D James M. Montgomery January 1987 James M. Montgomery 6,262,334.98 15 San_Sevaine_- _Boyle_Map_00 01 San Sevaine - Boyle Map 0001.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22San_Sevain e_- _Boyle_Map_00 01%22%7D Boyle Engineering June 1997 Boyle Engineering 8,752,537.31 6/16/22, 12:21 PM 7/11 16 San_Sevaine_- _Boyle_Map_00 02 San Sevaine - Boyle Map 0002.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22San_Sevain e_- _Boyle_Map_00 02%22%7D Boyle Engineering June 1997 Boyle Engineering 8,752,537.31 17 San_Sevaine_- _Boyle_Map_00 03 San Sevaine - Boyle Map 0003.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22San_Sevain e_- _Boyle_Map_00 03%22%7D Boyle Engineering June 1997 Boyle Engineering 8,752,537.31 18 Cactus_Basin Cactus Basin.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22Cactus Basin%22%7D San Bernardino County Flood Control District October 1985 San Bernardino County Flood Control District 9,310,002.55 19 Summary_Repor t_Master_Storm_ Drainage_Plan_ Study City n Sphere of Influence Summary Report VOL1.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22City_n_Sphe re_of_Influence_ Summary_Repor t_VOL1%22%7D Hall & Foreman, Inc June 1992 Hall & Foreman 9,310,002.55 20 Summary_Repor t_Master_Storm_ Drainage_Plan_ Map City n Sphere of Influence Summary RptVOL1_map.p df http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22City_n_Sphe re_of_Influence_ Summary_RptV OL1_map%22% 7D Hall & Foreman, Inc June 1992 Hall & Foreman, Inc 9,310,002.55 6/16/22, 12:21 PM 8/11 21 CSDP_3- 4_100yr_Hydrolo gy_Update CSDP 3-4 - 100yr Hydrology Update.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22CSDP_3-4_- _100yr_Hydrolog y_Update%22%7 D San Bernardino County Flood Control District September 1997 San Bernardino County Flood Control District 9,310,002.55 22 CSDP_3- 4_Engineers_Re port_Volume_1 CSDP 3-4 - Volume 1.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22CSDP_3-4_- _Volume_1%22 %7D San Bernardino County Flood Control District October 1992 San Bernardino County Flood Control District 9,310,002.55 23 CSDP_3- 4_Hydrology_Stu dy_West_Portion _Only CSDP 3-4 Hydrology Study West Portion Only.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22CSDP_3- 4_Hydrology_Stu dy_West_Portion _Only%22%7D San Bernardino County Flood Control District July 1988 San Bernardino County Flood Control District 9,310,002.55 24 CSDP_3- 4_Hydrology_Stu dy_East_Portion CSDP 3-4 Hydrology Study East Portion Only.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22CSDP_3- 4_Hydrology_Stu dy_East_Portion _Only%22%7D San Bernardino County Flood Control District July 1998 San Bernardino County Flood Control District 9,310,002.55 25 CSDP_3_CALC_ SHEET_FOR_H YDRO CSDP 3 CALC SHEET FOR HYDRO.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22CSDP 3 CALC SHEET FOR HYDRO%22%7 D San Bernardino County Flood Control District April 1973 San Bernardino County Flood Control District 9,310,002.55 6/16/22, 12:21 PM 9/11 26 FONTANA_MPD _FEE_STUDY FONTANA MPD FEE STUDY.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22FONTANA_ MPD_FEE_STU DY%22%7D Flory, Olson & Van Osdel June 1992 Flory, Olson & Van Osdel 9,310,002.55 27 Hydrology_Study _Project_3- 4_East_Portion Hydrology Study Project 3-4 East Portion only.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22Hydrology_S tudy_Project_3- 4_East_Portion_ only%22%7D San Bernardino Flood Control District July 1998 San Bernardino Flood Control District 9,310,002.55 28 Hydrology_Study _Project_3- 4_West_portion_ Only Hydrology Study Project 3-4 West portion Only.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22Hydrology_S tudy_Project_3- 4_West_portion_ Only%22%7D San Bernardino Flood Control District July 1998 San Bernardino Flood Control District 9,310,002.55 29 Master_SD_Hydr ology_Calcs_for_ Fontana_Vol_III Master Storm Drain for Fontana Vol III.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22Master_Stor m_Drain_for_Fo ntana_Vol_III%2 2%7D Hall & Foreman, Inc May 1992 Hall & Foreman, Inc 9,310,002.55 30 Master_SD_Hydr ology_Calcs_For _Fontana_Vol_II Master SD Hydrology Calcs For Fontana Vol II.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22Master_SD_ Hydrology_Calcs _For_Fontana_V ol_II%22%7D Hall & Foreman, Inc May 1992 Hall & Foreman, Inc 9,310,002.55 6/16/22, 12:21 PM 10/11 31 Master_SD_Hydr ology_Calcs_for_ Fontana_Vol_V Master SD Hydrology Calcs for Fontana Vol V.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22Master_SD_ Hydrology_Calcs _for_Fontana_Vo l_V%22%7D Hall & Foreman, Inc May 1992 Hall & Foreman, Inc 9,310,002.55 32 Master_SD_Hydr ology_Calcs_for_ Fontana_Vol_IV Master SD Hydrology Calcs for Fontana Vol IV.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22Master_SD_ Hydrology_Calcs _for_Fontana_Vo l_IV%22%7D Hall & Foreman, Inc May 1992 Hall & Foreman, Inc 9,310,002.55 33 Project_#3- 4_100yr_Hydrolo gy_Update_Sept 1997 Project 3-4 100yr Hydrology Update Sept1997.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22Project_3- 4_100yr_Hydrolo gy_Update_Sept 1997%22%7D San Bernardino County Flood Control District September 1997 San Bernardino County Flood Control District 9,310,002.55 34 West_Fontana_C hannel_Prelimina ry_Basin_Study West Fontana Channel October 1986.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22West_Fonta na_Channel_Oct ober_1986%22% 7D San Bernardino County Flood Control District October 1986 San Bernardino County Flood Control District 9,310,002.55 35 SBVMWD_High_ Groundwater_/_ Pressure_Zone_ Area USGS High Groundwater Report 2005 - compressed.pdf http://170.164.60 .159/WebLink/Se arch.aspx? dbid=6&searchco mmand=%7B%5 BFldCtl_Strmwtr FacMapToolDocs _Template%5D% 3A%5Bfcsw_Doc Name%5D%3D %22USGS_High _Groundwater_R eport_2005_- compressed%22 %7D USGS 2005 USGS & San Bern Valley Municipal Water District 9,310,002.55 6/16/22, 12:21 PM 11/11 Note: The information provided in this report and on the Stormwater Geodatabase for the County of San Bernardino Stormwater Program is intended to provide basic guidance in the preparation of the applicant’s Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and should not be relied upon without independent verification. without independent verification.