The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAppendix B1 - Air Quality Impact Analysis Fontana Corporate Center AIR QUALITY IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF FONTANA PREPARED BY: Haseeb Qureshi hqureshi@urbanxroads.com Alyssa Barnett abarnett@urbanxroads.com NOVEMBER 11, 2021 14102-02 AQ Report Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................... I APPENDICES ...................................................................................................................................... II LIST OF EXHIBITS ................................................................................................................................ II LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................. II LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS ........................................................................................................... IV EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 1 ES.1 Summary of Findings ..................................................................................................................... 1 ES.2 Regulatory Requirements ............................................................................................................. 1 ES.3 Project Mitigation Measures ........................................................................................................ 3 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Site Location .................................................................................................................................. 5 1.2 Project Description ........................................................................................................................ 5 2 AIR QUALITY SETTING ................................................................................................................ 9 2.1 South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) ........................................................................................................ 9 2.2 Regional Climate ........................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Wind Patterns and Project Location ........................................................................................... 10 2.4 Criteria Pollutants ....................................................................................................................... 11 2.5 Existing Air Quality ...................................................................................................................... 18 2.6 Regional Air Quality .................................................................................................................... 21 2.7 Local Air Quality .......................................................................................................................... 21 2.8 Regulatory Background ............................................................................................................... 22 2.9 Regional Air Quality Improvement ............................................................................................. 26 3 PROJECT AIR QUALITY IMPACT ................................................................................................ 38 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 38 3.2 Standards of Significance ............................................................................................................ 38 3.3 Models Employed To Analyze Air Quality ................................................................................... 39 3.4 Construction Emissions ............................................................................................................... 39 3.5 Operational Emissions ................................................................................................................ 43 3.6 Localized Significance .................................................................................................................. 47 3.7 Construction-Source Emissions LST Analysis .............................................................................. 52 3.8 Operational-Source Emissions LST Analysis ................................................................................ 53 3.9 CO “Hot Spot” Analysis ............................................................................................................... 55 3.10 AQMP .......................................................................................................................................... 57 3.11 Potential Impacts to Sensitive Receptors ................................................................................... 60 3.12 Odors ........................................................................................................................................... 61 3.13 Cumulative Impacts .................................................................................................................... 62 4 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................ 65 5 CERTIFICATIONS ...................................................................................................................... 69 Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report ii APPENDICES APPENDIX 2.1: STATE/FEDERAL ATTAINMENT STATUS OF CRITERIA POLLUTANTS APPENDIX 3.1: CALEEMOD PROJECT CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS (UNMITIGATED) APPENDIX 3.2: CALEEMOD PROJECT CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS (MITIGATED) APPENDIX 3.3: CALEEMOD EXISTING OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS APPENDIX 3.4: CALEEMOD PROJECT OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS APPENDIX 3.5: SCAQMD AMICUS BRIEF LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT 1-A: LOCATION MAP ............................................................................................................. 6 EXHIBIT 1-B: SITE PLAN ...................................................................................................................... 7 EXHIBIT 2-A: DPM AND DIESEL VEHICLE MILES TREND ....................................................................... 35 EXHIBIT 3-A: RECEPTOR LOCATIONS................................................................................................. 51 LIST OF TABLES TABLE ES-1: SUMMARY OF CEQA SIGNIFICANCE FINDINGS ................................................................. 1 TABLE 2-1: CRITERIA POLLUTANTS .................................................................................................... 11 TABLE 2-2: AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS (1 OF 2).................................................................... 19 TABLE 2-2: AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS (2 OF 2).................................................................... 20 TABLE 2-3: ATTAINMENT STATUS OF CRITERIA POLLUTANTS IN THE SCAB ......................................... 21 TABLE 2-4: PROJECT AREA AIR QUALITY MONITORING SUMMARY 2018-2020.................................... 22 TABLE 2-5: SCAB O3 TREND ............................................................................................................... 28 TABLE 2-6: SCAB AVERAGE 24-HOUR CONCENTRATION PM10 TREND (BASED ON FEDERAL STANDARD)1 ............................................................................................................................................... 29 TABLE 2-7: SCAB ANNUAL AVERAGE CONCENTRATION PM10 TREND (BASED ON STATE STANDARD)1 .. 29 TABLE 2-8: SCAB 24-HOUR AVERAGE CONCENTRATION PM2.5 TREND (BASED ON FEDERAL STANDARD)1 ............................................................................................................................................... 30 TABLE 2-9: SCAB ANNUAL AVERAGE CONCENTRATION PM2.5 TREND (BASED ON STATE STANDARD)1 . 30 TABLE 2-10: SCAB 8-HOUR AVERAGE CONCENTRATION CO TREND1 ................................................... 32 TABLE 2-11: SCAB 1-HOUR AVERAGE CONCENTRATION NO2 TREND (BASED ON FEDERAL STANDARD) 33 TABLE 2-12: SCAB 1-HOUR AVERAGE CONCENTRATION NO2 TREND (BASED ON STATE STANDARD) ... 33 TABLE 3-1: MAXIMUM DAILY REGIONAL EMISSIONS THRESHOLDS .................................................... 38 TABLE 3-2: CONSTRUCTION TRIP ASSUMPTIONS ............................................................................... 40 TABLE 3-3: CONSTRUCTION DURATION ............................................................................................. 41 TABLE 3-4: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ASSUMPTIONS (1 OF 2) ...................................................... 41 TABLE 3-4: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ASSUMPTIONS (2 OF 2) ...................................................... 42 TABLE 3-5: OVERALL CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS SUMMARY – WITHOUT MITIGATION ..................... 42 TABLE 3-6: OVERALL CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS SUMMARY – WITH MITIGATION ............................ 43 TABLE 3-7: PASSENGER CAR FLEET MIX ............................................................................................. 45 TABLE 3-8: TRUCK FLEET MIX ............................................................................................................ 45 TABLE 3-9: EMISSIONS FROM EXISTING DEVELOPMENT .................................................................... 46 TABLE 3-10: SUMMARY OF PEAK OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS .............................................................. 47 TABLE 3-11: MAXIMUM DAILY LOCALIZED CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS THRESHOLDS ........................ 52 Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report iii TABLE 3-12: LOCALIZED CONSTRUCTION-SOURCE EMISSIONS – WITHOUT MITIGATION ..................... 53 TABLE 3-13: MAXIMUM DAILY LOCAL IZED OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS THRESHOLDS .......................... 54 TABLE 3-14: LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS ................................................... 55 TABLE 3-15: CO MODEL RESULTS ...................................................................................................... 55 TABLE 3-16: TRAFFIC VOLUMES ........................................................................................................ 56 TABLE 3-17: PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES .......................................................................................... 57 Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report iv LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS % Percent °F Degrees Fahrenheit (1) Reference µg/m3 Microgram per Cubic Meter 1992 CO Plan 1992 Federal Attainment Plan for Carbon Monoxide 1993 CEQA Handbook SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook (1993) 2016-2040 RTP/SCS 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy AB 2595 California Clean Air Act AQIA Air Quality Impact Analysis AQMP Air Quality Management Plan BACT Best Available Control Technology BC Black Carbon Brief Brief of Amicus Curiae by the SCAQMD in the Friant Ranch Case C2Cl4 Perchloroethylene C4H6 1,3-butadiene C6H6 Benzene C2H3Cl Vinyl Chloride C2H4O Acetaldehyde CAA Federal Clean Air Act CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards CalEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model CalEPA California Environmental Protection Agency CALGreen California Green Building Standards Code CAP Climate Action Plan CAPCOA California Air Pollution Control Officers Association CARB California Air Resources Board CCR California Code of Regulations CEC California Energy Commission CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CEQA Guidelines 2019 CEQA Statute and Guidelines CH2O Formaldehyde City City of Fontana CO Carbon Monoxide COH Coefficient of Haze Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report v COHb Carboxyhemoglobin Cr(VI) Chromium CTP Clean Truck Program DPM Diesel Particulate Matter DRRP Diesel Risk Reduction Plan EC Elemental Carbon EIR Environmental Impact Report EMFAC EMissions FACtor Model EPA Environmental Protection Agency ETW Equivalent Test Weight EV Electric Vehicle GHG Greenhouse Gas GVWR Gross Vehicle Weight Rating H2S Hydrogen Sulfide HDT Heavy-Duty Trucks HHDT Heavy-Heavy-Duty Trucks HI Hazard Index hp Horsepower I-10 Interstate 10 I-G General Industrial lbs Pounds lbs/day Pounds Per Day LDA Light Duty Auto LDT1/LDT2 Light-Duty Trucks LHDT1/LHDT2 Light-Heavy-Duty Trucks LST Localized Significance Threshold LST Methodology Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology MATES Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study MCY Motorcycles MDV Medium-Duty Vehicles MHDT Medium-Heavy-Duty Trucks MICR Maximum Individual Cancer Risk mph Miles Per Hour MWELO California Department of Water Resources’ Model Water Efficient N2 Nitrogen N2O Nitrous Oxide NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report vi NO Nitric Oxide NO2 Nitrogen Dioxide NOX Nitrogen Oxides O2 Oxygen O3 Ozone O2 Deficiency Chronic Hypoxemia OBD-II On-Board Diagnostic ODC Ozone Depleting Compounds ONT Ontario International Airport Pb Lead PM Particulate Matter PM10 Particulate Matter 10 microns in diameter or less PM2.5 Particulate Matter 2.5 microns in diameter or less POLA Port of Los Angeles POLB Port of Long Beach ppm Parts Per Million Project Fontana Corporate Center RECLAIM Regional Clean Air Incentives Market RFG-2 Reformulated Gasoline Regulation ROG Reactive Organic Gases SB Senate Bill SCAB South Coast Air Basin SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District sf Square Feet SIPs State Implementation Plans SO2 Sulfur Dioxide SO4 Sulfates SOX Sulfur Oxides SRA Source Receptor Area TAC Toxic Air Contaminant Title 24 California Building Code TITLE I Non-Attainment Provisions TITLE II Mobile Sources Provisions UFP Ultrafine Particles URBEMIS URBan EMISsions VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled VOC Volatile Organic Compounds Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report vii vph Vehicles Per Hour Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report viii This page intentionally left blank Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES.1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS The results of this Fontana Corporate Center in Section 3 of this report consistent with Appendix G of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (CEQA Guidelines) (1). Table ES- 1 shows the findings of significance for each potential air quality impact under CEQA before and after any required mitigation measures described below. TABLE ES-1: SUMMARY OF CEQA SIGNIFICANCE FINDINGS Analysis Report Section Significance Findings Unmitigated Mitigated Regional Construction Emissions 3.4 Less Than Significant n/a Localized Construction Emissions 3.7 Less Than Significant n/a Regional Operational Emissions 3.5 Less Than Significant n/a Localized Operational Emissions 3.7 Less Than Significant n/a CO “Hot Spot” Analysis 3.9 Less Than Significant n/a Air Quality Management Plan 3.10 Less Than Significant n/a Sensitive Receptors 3.11 Less Than Significant n/a Odors 3.12 Less Than Significant n/a Cumulative Impacts 3.13 Less Than Significant n/a ES.2 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS There are numerous requirements that development projects must comply with by law, and that were put in place by federal, State, and local regulatory agencies for the improvement of air quality. Any operation or activity that might cause the emission of any smoke, fly ash, dust, fumes, vapors, gases, or other forms of air pollution, which can cause damage to human health, vegetation, or other forms of property, or can cause excessive soiling on any other parcel shall conform to the requirements of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 2 SCAQMD RULES SCAQMD Rules that are currently applicable during construction activity for this Project are described below. SCAQMD RULE 403 This rule is intended to reduce the amount of particulate matter (PM) entrained in the ambient air as a result of anthropogenic (human-made) fugitive dust sources by requiring actions to prevent and reduce fugitive dust emissions. Rule 403 applies to any activity or human-made condition capable of generating fugitive dust and requires best available control measures to be applied to earth moving and grading activities. Dust Control, Operations. Any operation or activity that might cause the emission of any smoke, fly ash, dust, fumes, vapors, gases, or other forms of air pollution, which can cause damage to human health, vegetation, or other forms of property, or can cause excessive soiling on any other parcel, shall conform to the requirements of the SCAQMD. SCAQMD RULE 1113 This rule serves to limit the Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) content of architectural coatings used on projects in the SCAQMD. Any person who supplies, sells, offers for sale, or manufactures any architectural coating for use on projects. SCAQMD RULE 402 A person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material that cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or that endanger the comfort, repose, health, or safety of any such persons or the public, or that cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property. The provisions of this rule do not apply to odors emanating from agricultural operations necessary for the growing of crops or the raising of fowl or animals. Odor Emissions. All uses shall be operated in a manner such that no offensive odor is perceptible at or beyond the property line of that use. SCAQMD RULE 1301 This rule is intended to provide that pre-construction review requirements to ensure that new or relocated facilities do not interfere with progress in attainment of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), while future economic growth within the SCAQMD is not unnecessarily restricted. The specific air quality goal is to achieve no net increases from new or modified permitted sources of nonattainment air contaminants or their precursors. Rule 1301 also limits emission increases of ammonia, and Ozone Depleting Compounds (ODCs) from new, modified or relocated facilities by requiring the use of Best Available Control Technology (BACT). Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 3 SCAQMD RULE 1401 A person shall not discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emission whatsoever any air contaminant for a period or periods aggregating more than three minutes in any 1 hour that is as dark or darker in shade as that designated No. 1 on the Ringelmann Chart, as published by the United States (U.S.) Bureau of Mines. Although the Project would comply with the above regulatory requirements, it should be noted that there is no way to quantify these reductions in the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod). The two most pertinent regulatory requirements that could be modeled, are Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust) (2) and Rule 1113 (Architectural Coatings) (3). Because they are required by law, credit for Rule 403 and Rule 1113 have been taken in the analysis. TITLE 24 The proposed project is required to comply with Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR) established by the California Energy Commission (CEC) regarding energy conservation standards. ES.3 PROJECT MITIGATION MEASURES ES.3.1 CONSTRUCTION-SOURCE MMS The Project construction-source emissions have the potential to exceed SCAQMD regional thresholds for VOC emissions prior to mitigation. MM AQ-1 is designed to reduce Project construction-source VOCs. After application of MM AQ-1, Project construction-source emissions will not exceed SCAQMD regional thresholds for VOC emissions. Thus, the Project would result in a less than significant impact associated with construction activities. MM AQ-1 The Project shall utilize “Super-Compliant” low VOC paints for nonresidential interior and exterior surfaces and low VOC paint for parking lot surfaces. Super-Compliant low VOC paints have been reformulated to exceed the regulatory VOC limits put forth by SCAQMD’s Rule 1113. Super- Compliant low VOC paints shall be no more than 10 grams per liter (g/L) of VOC. Alternatively, the applicant may utilize tilt-up concrete buildings that do not require the use of architectural coatings. ES.3.2 OPERATIONAL-SOURCE MMS The Project would not result in an exceedance of any regional or localized operational-source emissions thresholds. As such, the Project would not result in any significant impacts and no MMs are required. Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 4 This page intentionally left blank Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 5 1 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of the AQIA prepared by Urban Crossroads, Inc., for the proposed Fontana Corporate Center (Project). The purpose of this AQIA is to evaluate the potential impacts to air quality associated with construction and operation of the Project and recommend measures to mitigate impacts considered potentially significant in comparison to thresholds established by the SCAQMD. 1.1 SITE LOCATION The proposed Project is located north of Slover Avenue and west of Business Drive in the City of Fontana, as shown on Exhibit 1-A. The Project site is located south of Interstate 10 (I-10) the Southern Pacific Railroad, and approximately four miles east of the Ontario International Airport (ONT). The closest existing noise-sensitive residential uses in the Project study area are located to the east and southeast of the Project site, with industrial uses located east, south, and west of the Project site. 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Project is to amend the existing Fontana Gateway Specific Plan to develop two warehouse buildings totaling 355,370 square feet (sf). Building 1 to the east is to consist of 212,677 sf of warehouse use and Building 2 to the west is to consist of 142,693 sf of warehousing use. The Project is anticipated to be developed within a single phase with an Opening Year of 2023. The preliminary site plan for the proposed Project is shown on Exhibit 1-B. To present the potential worst-case conditions, the Project is assumed to be operational 24 hours per day, seven days per week. It is expected that the Project business operations would primarily be conducted within the enclosed buildings, except for traffic movement, parking, as well as loading and unloading of trucks at designated loading bays. This analysis includes a conservative assumption of on-site Project-related emission sources for potential future tenants, including architectural coatings, consumer products, landscape maintenance equipment, natural gas, electricity, mobile operations, and on-site cargo handling equipment. This analysis is intended to describe air quality impacts associated with the expected typical operational activities at the Project site. To present a conservative approach, this report assumes the Project would operate 24-hours daily for seven days per week. Per the Fontana Corporate Center Traffic Study prepared by Urban Crossroads, Inc., the Project is expected to generate a total of approximately 622 vehicular trips-ends per day (actual vehicles) which includes 170 two-way truck trips per day (4). Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 6 EXHIBIT 1-A: LOCATION MAP E 4th SI AIRPORT OR Santa An..'\SANTA ANA ST n Berrurdiro Ave SAN BERNARDINO AVE &lr.taAru Ave. V,1llerBl"'l:I S.P.R.R. RR St@VER,AVE Fontana Gateway ) I Site I I L--------I nt.l Aru Ave I S.,n Berrunt1m Ave .... .1128" v.111erBtvo SOUTHERN PACIFIC RR l IRIS DRis J § an•B Sources: Esri, Hfl?E,5~/~;~~:t:YJap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAD, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, /GN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri Chino (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 7 EXHIBIT 1-B: SITE PLAN I I -1---aUttOIMG-2-- JO " " >· j 142,69~ SF I I I I -,-----,---- 1 ,so I f--71' ~ I I I I I I I I I C I I I I I ( "' [] I I, I I ....• I,.__ 135' ►I ~~~~=_J ---+------\- ' I I I ----------------------------------(,MH!~~ Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 8 This page intentionally left blank Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 9 2 AIR QUALITY SETTING This section provides an overview of the existing air quality conditions in the Project area and region. 2.1 SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN (SCAB) The Project site is located in the SCAB within the jurisdiction of SCAQMD (5). The SCAQMD was created by the 1977 Lewis-Presley Air Quality Management Act, which merged four county air pollution control bodies into one regional district. Under the Act, the SCAQMD is responsible for bringing air quality in areas under its jurisdiction into conformity with federal and state air quality standards. As previously stated, the Project site is located within the SCAB, a 6,745-square mile subregion of the SCAQMD, which includes portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, and all of Orange County. The SCAB is bounded by the Pacific Ocean to the west and the San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto Mountains to the north and east. The Los Angeles County portion of the Mojave Desert Air Basin is bounded by the San Gabriel Mountains to the south and west, the Los Angeles / Kern County border to the north, and the Los Angeles / San Bernardino County border to the east. The Riverside County portion of the Salton Sea Air Basin is bounded by the San Jacinto Mountains in the west and spans eastward up to the Palo Verde Valley. 2.2 REGIONAL CLIMATE The regional climate has a substantial influence on air quality in the SCAB. In addition, the temperature, wind, humidity, precipitation, and amount of sunshine influence the air quality. The annual average temperatures throughout the SCAB vary from the low to middle 60s degrees Fahrenheit (°F). Due to a decreased marine influence, the eastern portion of the SCAB shows greater variability in average annual minimum and maximum temperatures. January is the coldest month throughout the SCAB, with average minimum temperatures of 47°F in downtown Los Angeles and 36°F in San Bernardino. All portions of the SCAB have recorded maximum temperatures above 100°F. Although the climate of the SCAB can be characterized as semi-arid, the air near the land surface is quite moist on most days because of the presence of a marine layer. This shallow layer of sea air is an important modifier of SCAB climate. Humidity restricts visibility in the SCAB, and the conversion of sulfur dioxide (SO2) to sulfates (SO4) is heightened in air with high relative humidity. The marine layer provides an environment for that conversion process, especially during the spring and summer months. The annual average relative humidity within the SCAB is 71% along the coast and 59% inland. Since the ocean effect is dominant, periods of heavy early morning fog are frequent and low stratus clouds are a characteristic feature. These effects decrease with distance from the coast. More than 90% of the SCAB’s rainfall occurs from November through April. The annual average rainfall varies from approximately nine inches in Riverside to fourteen inches in downtown Los Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 10 Angeles. Monthly and yearly rainfall totals are extremely variable. Summer rainfall usually consists of widely scattered thunderstorms near the coast and slightly heavier shower activity in the eastern portion of the SCAB with frequency being higher near the coast. Due to its generally clear weather, about three-quarters of available sunshine is received in the SCAB. The remaining one-quarter is absorbed by clouds. The ultraviolet portion of this abundant radiation is a key factor in photochemical reactions. On the shortest day of the year there are approximately 10 hours of possible sunshine, and on the longest day of the year there are approximately 14½ hours of possible sunshine. The importance of wind to air pollution is considerable. The direction and speed of the wind determines the horizontal dispersion and transport of the air pollutants. During the late autumn to early spring rainy season, the SCAB is subjected to wind flows associated with the traveling storms moving through the region from the northwest. This period also brings five to ten periods of strong, dry offshore winds, locally termed “Santa Anas” each year. During the dry season, which coincides with the months of maximum photochemical smog concentrations, the wind flow is bimodal, typified by a daytime onshore sea breeze and a nighttime offshore drainage wind. Summer wind flows are created by the pressure differences between the relatively cold ocean and the unevenly heated and cooled land surfaces that modify the general northwesterly wind circulation over southern California. Nighttime drainage begins with the radiational cooling of the mountain slopes. Heavy, cool air descends the slopes and flows through the mountain passes and canyons as it follows the lowering terrain toward the ocean. Another characteristic wind regime in the SCAB is the “Catalina Eddy,” a low level cyclonic (counterclockwise) flow centered over Santa Catalina Island which results in an offshore flow to the southwest. On most spring and summer days, some indication of an eddy is apparent in coastal sections. In the SCAB, there are two distinct temperature inversion structures that control vertical mixing of air pollution. During the summer, warm high-pressure descending (subsiding) air is undercut by a shallow layer of cool marine air. The boundary between these two layers of air is a persistent marine subsidence/inversion. This boundary prevents vertical mixing which effectively acts as an impervious lid to pollutants over the entire SCAB. The mixing height for the inversion structure is normally situated 1,000 to 1,500 feet above mean sea level. A second inversion-type forms in conjunction with the drainage of cool air off the surrounding mountains at night followed by the seaward drift of this pool of cool air. The top of this layer forms a sharp boundary with the warmer air aloft and creates nocturnal radiation inversions. These inversions occur primarily in the winter when nights are longer and onshore flow is weakest. They are typically only a few hundred feet above mean sea level. These inversions effectively trap pollutants, such as NOX and CO from vehicles, as the pool of cool air drifts seaward. Winter is therefore a period of high levels of primary pollutants along the coastline. 2.3 WIND PATTERNS AND PROJECT LOCATION The distinctive climate of the Project area and the SCAB is determined by its terrain and geographical location. The SCAB is located in a coastal plain with connecting broad valleys and Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 11 low hills, bounded by the Pacific Ocean in the southwest quadrant with high mountains forming the remainder of the perimeter. Wind patterns across the south coastal region are characterized by westerly and southwesterly onshore winds during the day and easterly or northeasterly breezes at night. Winds are characteristically light although the speed is somewhat greater during the dry summer months than during the rainy winter season. 2.4 CRITERIA POLLUTANTS Criteria pollutants are pollutants that are regulated through the development of human health based and/or environmentally based criteria for setting permissible levels. Criteria pollutants, their typical sources, and health effects are identified below (6): TABLE 2-1: CRITERIA POLLUTANTS Criteria Pollutant Description Sources Health Effects CO CO is a colorless, odorless gas produced by the incomplete combustion of carbon-containing fuels, such as gasoline or wood. CO concentrations tend to be the highest during the winter morning, when little to no wind and surface-based inversions trap the pollutant at ground levels. Because CO is emitted directly from internal combustion engines, unlike ozone (O3), motor vehicles operating at slow speeds are the primary source of CO in the SCAB. The highest ambient CO concentrations are generally found near congested transportation corridors and intersections. Any source that burns fuel such as automobiles, trucks, heavy construction equipment, farming equipment and residential heating. Individuals with a deficient blood supply to the heart are the most susceptible to the adverse effects of CO exposure. The effects observed include earlier onset of chest pain with exercise, and electrocardiograph changes indicative of decreased oxygen (O2) supply to the heart. Inhaled CO has no direct toxic effect on the lungs but exerts its effect on tissues by interfering with O2 transport and competing with O2 to combine with hemoglobin present in the blood to form carboxyhemoglobin (COHb). Hence, conditions with an increased demand for O2 supply can be adversely affected by exposure to CO. Individuals most at risk include fetuses, patients with diseases involving heart and blood vessels, and patients with chronic hypoxemia (O2 deficiency) as seen at high altitudes. Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 12 Criteria Pollutant Description Sources Health Effects SO2 SO2 is a colorless, extremely irritating gas or liquid. It enters the atmosphere as a pollutant mainly as a result of burning high sulfur-content fuel oils and coal and from chemical processes occurring at chemical plants and refineries. When SO2 oxidizes in the atmosphere, it forms SO4. Collectively, these pollutants are referred to as sulfur oxides (SOX). Coal or oil burning power plants and industries, refineries, diesel engines A few minutes of exposure to low levels of SO2 can result in airway constriction in some asthmatics, all of whom are sensitive to its effects. In asthmatics, increase in resistance to air flow, as well as reduction in breathing capacity leading to severe breathing difficulties, are observed after acute exposure to SO2. In contrast, healthy individuals do not exhibit similar acute responses even after exposure to higher concentrations of SO2. Animal studies suggest that despite SO2 being a respiratory irritant, it does not cause substantial lung injury at ambient concentrations. However, very high levels of exposure can cause lung edema (fluid accumulation), lung tissue damage, and sloughing off of cells lining the respiratory tract. Some population-based studies indicate that the mortality and morbidity effects associated with fine particles show a similar association with ambient SO2 levels. In these studies, efforts to separate the effects of SO2 from those of fine particles have not been successful. It is not clear whether the two pollutants act synergistically, or one pollutant alone is the predominant factor. Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 13 Criteria Pollutant Description Sources Health Effects NOX NOX consist of nitric oxide (NO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and nitrous oxide (N2O) and are formed when nitrogen (N2) combines with O2. Their lifespan in the atmosphere ranges from one to seven days for nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide, to 170 years for nitrous oxide. NOX is typically created during combustion processes and are major contributors to smog formation and acid deposition. NO2 is a criteria air pollutant and may result in numerous adverse health effects; it absorbs blue light, resulting in a brownish-red cast to the atmosphere and reduced visibility. Of the seven types of NOX compounds, NO2 is the most abundant in the atmosphere. As ambient concentrations of NO2 are related to traffic density, commuters in heavy traffic may be exposed to higher concentrations of NO2 than those indicated by regional monitoring station. Any source that burns fuel such as automobiles, trucks, heavy construction equipment, farming equipment and residential heating. Population-based studies suggest that an increase in acute respiratory illness, including infections and respiratory symptoms in children (not infants), is associated with long-term exposure to NO2 at levels found in homes with gas stoves, which are higher than ambient levels found in Southern California. Increase in resistance to air flow and airway contraction is observed after short-term exposure to NO2 in healthy subjects. Larger decreases in lung functions are observed in individuals with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (e.g., chronic bronchitis, emphysema) than in healthy individuals, indicating a greater susceptibility of these sub-groups. In animals, exposure to levels of NO2 considerably higher than ambient concentrations result in increased susceptibility to infections, possibly due to the observed changes in cells involved in maintaining immune functions. The severity of lung tissue damage associated with high levels of O3 exposure increases when animals are exposed to a combination of O3 and NO2. O3 O3 is a highly reactive and unstable gas that is formed when VOCs and NOX, both byproducts of internal combustion engine exhaust, undergo slow photochemical reactions in the presence of sunlight. O3 concentrations are generally highest during the summer Formed when reactive organic gases (ROG) and NOX react in the presence of sunlight. ROG sources include any source Individuals exercising outdoors, children, and people with preexisting lung disease, such as asthma and chronic pulmonary lung disease, are considered to be the most susceptible sub- groups for O3 effects. Short- term exposure (lasting for a Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 14 Criteria Pollutant Description Sources Health Effects months when direct sunlight, light wind, and warm temperature conditions are favorable to the formation of this pollutant. that burns fuels, (e.g., gasoline, natural gas, wood, oil) solvents, petroleum processing and storage and pesticides. few hours) to O3 at levels typically observed in Southern California can result in breathing pattern changes, reduction of breathing capacity, increased susceptibility to infections, inflammation of the lung tissue, and some immunological changes. Elevated O3 levels are associated with increased school absences. In recent years, a correlation between elevated ambient O3 levels and increases in daily hospital admission rates, as well as mortality, has also been reported. An increased risk for asthma has been found in children who participate in multiple outdoor sports and reside in communities with high O3 levels. O3 exposure under exercising conditions is known to increase the severity of the responses described above. Animal studies suggest that exposure to a combination of pollutants that includes O3 may be more toxic than exposure to O3 alone. Although lung volume and resistance changes observed after a single exposure diminish with repeated exposures, biochemical and cellular changes appear to persist, which can lead to subsequent lung structural changes. Particulate Matter PM10: A major air pollutant consisting of tiny solid or liquid particles of soot, dust, smoke, fumes, and aerosols. Particulate matter pollution is a major cause of reduce visibility (haze) which is caused by the scattering of light Sources of PM10 include road dust, windblown dust and construction. Also formed from other pollutants (acid rain, NOX, SOX, A consistent correlation between elevated ambient fine particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) levels and an increase in mortality rates, respiratory infections, number and severity of Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 15 Criteria Pollutant Description Sources Health Effects and consequently the significant reduction air clarity. The size of the particles (10 microns or smaller, about 0.0004 inches or less) allows them to easily enter the lungs where they may be deposited, resulting in adverse health effects. Additionally, it should be noted that PM10 is considered a criteria air pollutant. PM2.5: A similar air pollutant to PM10 consisting of tiny solid or liquid particles which are 2.5 microns or smaller (which is often referred to as fine particles). These particles are formed in the atmosphere from primary gaseous emissions that include SO4 formed from SO2 release from power plants and industrial facilities and nitrates that are formed from NOX release from power plants, automobiles, and other types of combustion sources. The chemical composition of fine particles highly depends on location, time of year, and weather conditions. PM2.5 is a criteria air pollutant. organics). Incomplete combustion of any fuel. PM2.5 comes from fuel combustion in motor vehicles, equipment, and industrial sources, residential and agricultural burning. Also formed from reaction of other pollutants (acid rain, NOX, SOX, organics). asthma attacks and the number of hospital admissions has been observed in different parts of the U.S. and various areas around the world. In recent years, some studies have reported an association between long-term exposure to air pollution dominated by fine particles and increased mortality, reduction in lifespan, and an increased mortality from lung cancer. Daily fluctuations in PM2.5 concentration levels have also been related to hospital admissions for acute respiratory conditions in children, to school and kindergarten absences, to a decrease in respiratory lung volumes in normal children, and to increased medication use in children and adults with asthma. Recent studies show lung function growth in children is reduced with long term exposure to particulate matter. The elderly, people with pre- existing respiratory or cardiovascular disease, and children appear to be more susceptible to the effects of high levels of PM10 and PM2.5. VOC VOCs are hydrocarbon compounds (any compound containing various combinations of hydrogen and carbon atoms) that exist in the ambient air. VOCs contribute to the formation of smog through atmospheric photochemical reactions and/or may be toxic. Compounds of carbon (also known as organic compounds) have different levels of reactivity; that is, they do not react at the same speed or do not Organic chemicals are widely used as ingredients in household products. Paints, varnishes, and wax all contain organic solvents, as do many cleaning, disinfecting, cosmetic, degreasing and hobby products. Breathing VOCs can irritate the eyes, nose, and throat, can cause difficulty breathing and nausea, and can damage the central nervous system as well as other organs. Some VOCs can cause cancer. Not all VOCs have all these health effects, though many have several. Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 16 Criteria Pollutant Description Sources Health Effects form O3 to the same extent when exposed to photochemical processes. VOCs often have an odor, and some examples include gasoline, alcohol, and the solvents used in paints. Exceptions to the VOC designation include CO, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbides or carbonates, and ammonium carbonate. VOCs are a criteria pollutant since they are a precursor to O3, which is a criteria pollutant. The terms VOC and ROG (see below) interchangeably. Fuels are made up of organic chemicals. All of these products can release organic compounds while you are using them, and, to some degree, when they are stored. ROG Similar to VOC, ROGs are also precursors in forming O3 and consist of compounds containing methane, ethane, propane, butane, and longer chain hydrocarbons, which are typically the result of some type of combustion/decomposition process. Smog is formed when ROG and NOX react in the presence of sunlight. ROGs are a criteria pollutant since they are a precursor to O3, which is a criteria pollutant. The terms ROG and VOC (see previous) interchangeably. Sources similar to VOCs. Health effects similar to VOCs. Lead (Pb) Pb is a heavy metal that is highly persistent in the environment and is considered a criteria pollutant. In the past, the primary source of Pb in the air was emissions from vehicles burning leaded gasoline. The major sources of Pb emissions are ore and metals processing, particularly Pb smelters, and piston-engine aircraft operating on leaded aviation gasoline. Other stationary sources include waste incinerators, utilities, and lead-acid battery manufacturers. It should be noted that the Project does not include Metal smelters, resource recovery, leaded gasoline, deterioration of Pb paint. Fetuses, infants, and children are more sensitive than others to the adverse effects of Pb exposure. Exposure to low levels of Pb can adversely affect the development and function of the central nervous system, leading to learning disorders, distractibility, inability to follow simple commands, and lower intelligence quotient. In adults, increased Pb levels are associated with increased blood pressure. Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 17 Criteria Pollutant Description Sources Health Effects operational activities such as metal processing or Pb acid battery manufacturing. As such, the Project is not anticipated to generate a quantifiable amount of Pb emissions. Pb poisoning can cause anemia, lethargy, seizures, and death; although it appears that there are no direct effects of Pb on the respiratory system. Pb can be stored in the bone from early age environmental exposure, and elevated blood Pb levels can occur due to breakdown of bone tissue during pregnancy, hyperthyroidism (increased secretion of hormones from the thyroid gland) and osteoporosis (breakdown of bony tissue). Fetuses and breast-fed babies can be exposed to higher levels of Pb because of previous environmental Pb exposure of their mothers. Odor Odor means the perception experienced by a person when one or more chemical substances in the air come into contact with the human olfactory nerves (7). Odors can come from many sources including animals, human activities, industry, natures, and vehicles. Offensive odors can potentially affect human health in several ways. First, odorant compounds can irritate the eye, nose, and throat, which can reduce respiratory volume. Second, studies have shown that the VOCs that cause odors can stimulate sensory nerves to cause neurochemical changes that might influence health, for instance, by compromising the immune system. Finally, unpleasant odors can trigger memories or attitudes linked to unpleasant odors, causing cognitive and emotional effects such as stress. Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 18 2.5 EXISTING AIR QUALITY Existing air quality is measured at established SCAQMD air quality monitoring stations. Monitored air quality is evaluated in the context of ambient air quality standards. These standards are the levels of air quality that are considered safe, with an adequate margin of safety, to protect the public health and welfare. NAAQS and California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) currently in effect are shown in Table 2-2 (8). The determination of whether a region’s air quality is healthful or unhealthful is determined by comparing contaminant levels in ambient air samples to the state and federal standards. At the time of this AQIA, the most recent state and federal standards were updated by CARB on May 4, 2016 and are presented in Table 2-2. The air quality in a region is considered to be in attainment by the state if the measured ambient air pollutant levels for O3, CO (except 8-hour Lake Tahoe), SO2 (1 and 24 hour), NO2, PM10, and PM2.5 do not exceed standards. All others are not to be equaled or exceeded. It should be noted that the three-year period is presented for informational purposes and is not the basis for how the State assigns attainment status. Attainment status for a pollutant means that the SCAQMD meets the standards set by the EPA or the California EPA (CalEPA). Conversely, nonattainment means that an area has monitored air quality that does not meet the NAAQS or CAAQS standards. In order to improve air quality in nonattainment areas, CARB has implemented a State Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP outlines the measures that the state would take to improve air quality. Once nonattainment areas meet the standards and additional redesignation requirements, the EPA would designate the area as a maintenance area (9). Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 19 TABLE 2-2: AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS (1 OF 2) Ambient Air Quality Standards Averaging California Standards ' National Standards 2 Pollutant Time Concentration 3 Method 4 Primary 3•5 Secondary 3·• Method 7 1 Hour 0.09 ppm (180 µg/m3) Ultraviolet -Same as Ultraviolet Ozone (0 3)8 Photometry Primary Standard Photometry 8 Hour 0.070 ppm (137 µgtm3) 0.070 ppm (137 µgtm3) Respirable 24 Hour 50 µg/m3 150 µgtni3 Inertial Separation Particulate Gravimetric or Same as and Gravimetric Annual Beta Attenuation Primary Standard Analysis Matter (PM10)9 Arithmetic Mean 20 µg/m3 - Fine 24 Hour 35 µg/m3 Same as Particulate --Primary Standard Inertial Separation Matter and Gravimetric Annual 12 µg/m3 Gravimetric or 12.0 µg/m3 15 µg/m3 Analysis (PM2.5)9 Arithmetic Mean Beta Attenuation 1 Hour 20 ppm (23 mg/m 3) 35 ppm (40 mg/m3) - Carbon Non-Dispersive Non-Dispersive Monoxide 8 Hour 9.0 ppm (10 mg/m3) Infrared Photometry 9 ppm (10 mg/m3) -Infrared Photometry (CO) (NDIR) (NDIR) 8 Hour 6 ppm (7 mg/m3) (Lake Tahoe) -- Nitrogen 1 Hour 0.18 ppm (339 µg/m3) 100 ppb (188 µgtm") - Dioxide Gas Phase Gas Phase (NO2)10 Annual 0.030 ppm (57 µg/m3) Chemiluminescence 0.053 ppm (100 µgtm") Same as Chemiluminescence Arithmetic Mean Primary Standard 1 Hour 0.25 ppm (655 µg/m3) 75 ppb (196 µg/m3) - 0.5 ppm Ultraviolet Sulfur Dioxide 3 Hour --(1300 µg/m3) Flourescence; Ultraviolet (SO,)11 Fluorescence 0.14 ppm Spectrophotometry 24 Hour 0.04 ppm (105 µg/m3) -(Pararosaniline (for certain areas)" Method) Annual 0.030 ppm Arithmetic Mean -(for certain areas)" - 30 Day Average 1.5 µg/m3 -- Calendar Quarter 1.5 µg/m3 High Volume Lead''·'3 -Atomic Absorption (for certain areas)" Sampler and Atomic Same as Absorption Rolling 3-Month Primary Standard Average -0.15 µg/m3 Visibility Beta Attenuation and Reducing 8Hour See footnote 14 Transmittance No Particles 14 through Filter Tape Sulfates 25 µg/m3 National 24 Hour Ion Chromatography Hydrogen 1 Hour 0.03 ppm (42 µg/m3) Ultraviolet Sulfide Fluorescence Standards Vinyl 24 Hour 0.01 ppm (26 µg/m3) Gas Chloride" Chromatography See footnotes on next page ... For more information please call ARB-PIO a1 (916) 322-2990 California Air Resources Board (5/4/16) Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 20 TABLE 2-2: AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS (2 OF 2) 1. California standards for ozone, carbon monoxide (except 8-hour Lake Tahoe), sulfur dioxide (1 and 24 hour), nitrogen dioxide, and particulate matter (PMl0, PM2.5, and visibility reducing panicles), are values that are not to be exceeded. All others are not to be equaled or exceeded. California ambient air quality standards are listed in the Table of Standards in Section 70200 of Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations. 2. ational standards (other than ozone. paniculate matter. and those based on annual arithmetic mean) are not to be exceeded more than once a year. The ozone standard is attained when the fourth highest 8-hour concentration measured at each site in a year, averaged over three years, is equal to or less than the standard. For PMl0, the 24 hour standard is attained when the expected number of days per calendar year with a 24-hour average concentration above 150 wi/m3 is equal to or less than one. For PM2.5, the 24 hour standard is attained when 98 percent of the daily concentrations, averaged over three years, are equal to or less than tl1e standard. Contact the U.S. EPA for further clarification and current national policies. 3. Concentration expressed first in units in whicl, it was promulgated. Equivalent units given in parentheses are based upon a reference temperantre of25°C and a reference pressure of 760 torr. Most measuren,ents of air quality are to be corrected to a reference temperantre of25°C and a reference pressure of 760 torr; ppm in this table refers to ppm by volume, or tnicromoles of pollutant per mole of gas. 4. Any equivalent measttrement method whicl, can be sho,,n to the satisfaction of the ARB to give equivalent results at or near the level of the air quality standard may be used. 5. National Primary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary. \\~th an adeqtk1te margin of safety to protect the public health. 6. National Secondary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary to protect the public welfare from any known or anticipated adverse effects of a pollutant. 7. Reference method as described by the U.S. EPA An "equirnlent method" of measurement may be used but must have a "consistent relationship to the reference method" and must be approved by the U.S. EPA 8. Ou October 1, 2015, the national 8-hour ozone prin,ary and secondary standards were lowered from 0.075 to 0.070 ppm. 9. Ou December 14, 2012, the national annual PM2.5 prin,ary standard was lowered from 15 11g/m3 to 12.0 11g/m3. The existing national 24- hour PM2.5 standards (prin,ary and secondary) were retained at 35 pg/m3, as was the annual secondary standard of 15 11g/m3. The existing 24-hour PMI0 standards (prin,ary and secondary) of 150 1ig/nf also were retained. Tue form of the annual prin,ary and secondary standards is the annual mean, averaged over 3 years. 10. To attain the I-hour national standard, the 3-year average oftl1e annual 98th percentile of the I-hour daily maximum concentrations at each site must not exceed 100 ppb. Note that the national I-hour standard is in units of parts per billion (ppb). California standards are in units of parts per tnillion (ppm). To directly compare the national I-hour standard to the California standards the units can be converted from ppb to ppm. In this case, the national standard of 100 ppb is identical to 0.100 ppm. 11. Ou J,me 2, 2010, a new I-hour SO2 standard was established and the existing 24-hour and armu.al primary standards were revoked. To attain the I-hour national standard, the 3-year average of the armu.al 99th percentile of the 1-hottr daily maximtUll concentrations at each site must not exceed 75 ppb. The 1971 SO, national standards (24-hour and armual) renlain in effect until one year after au area is designated for the 20 IO standard, except that in areas designated nonattairUllent for die 1971 standards, the 1971 standards remain in effect until inlplemeutation plans to attain or maintain the 2010 standards are approved. ote that the 1-hmtr national standard is in wtits of parts per billion (ppb ). California standards are in units of parts per million (ppm). To directly compare the I-hour national stancfard to the California standard the units can be converted to ppm. In this case, the natiol"k1I .standard of75 ppb is identical to 0.075 ppm. 12. The ARB has identified lead and vinyl chloride as 'toxic air contaminants' with no threshold level of exposttre for adverse health effects determined. These actions allow for the inlplementation of control measures at levels below the ambient concentrations specified for these pollutants. 13. The national standard for lead was re,~d on October 15, 2008 to a rolling 3-month average. The 1978 lead standard (1.5 µg/m3 as a quarterly average) remains in effect until one year after au area is designated for die 2008 standard, except tliat in areas designated nonattairUllent for the 1978 standard, the 1978 standard remains i.11 effect w1til in,plementation plans to attain or maintain tl1e 2008 standard are approved. 14. In 1989, the ARB converted both the general statewide 10-mile visibility standard and the Lake Tahoe 30-mile ,,sibility standard to iustnU11ental equivalents, which are "extinction of0.23 per kilotneter" and "extinction of0.07 per kilometer" for the state\\ode and Lake Tahoe Air Basin standards, respectiYely. for more information please raU ARB-PIO at (916) 322-2990 California Air Resources Board (S/4/16) Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 21 2.6 REGIONAL AIR QUALITY Air pollution contributes to a wide variety of adverse health effects. The EPA has established NAAQS for six of the most common air pollutants: CO, Pb, O3, particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), NO2, and SO2 which are known as criteria pollutants. The SCAQMD monitors levels of various criteria pollutants at 37 permanent monitoring stations and 5 single-pollutant source Pb air monitoring sites throughout the air district (10). On February 21, 2019, CARB posted the 2018 amendments to the state and national area designations. See Table 2-3 for attainment designations for the SCAB (11). Appendix 2.1 provides geographic representation of the state and federal attainment status for applicable criteria pollutants within the SCAB. TABLE 2-3: ATTAINMENT STATUS OF CRITERIA POLLUTANTS IN THE SCAB Criteria Pollutant State Designation Federal Designation O3 – 1-hour standard Nonattainment -- O3 – 8-hour standard Nonattainment Nonattainment PM10 Nonattainment Attainment PM2.5 Nonattainment Nonattainment CO Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment NO2 Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment SO2 Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Pb1 Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Note: See Appendix 2.1 for a detailed map of State/National Area Designations within the SCAB “-“ = The national 1-hour O3 standard was revoked effective June 15, 2005. 2.7 LOCAL AIR QUALITY The SCAQMD has designated general forecast areas and air monitoring areas (referred to as Source Receptor Areas [SRA]) throughout the district in order to provide Southern California residents about the air quality conditions. The Project site is located within the Central San Bernardino Valley 2 area (SRA 34). The Central San Bernardino Valley 2 monitoring station is located approximately 2.66 miles northeast of the Project site and reports air quality statistics for O3, CO, NO2, PM10, and PM2.5. The most recent three (3) years of data available is shown on Table 2-4 and identifies the number of days ambient air quality standards were exceeded for the study area, which is considered to be representative of the local air quality at the Project site. Data for O3, CO, NO2, PM10, and PM2.5 for 2018 through 2020 was obtained from the SCAQMD Air Quality Data Tables (12). Additionally, data for SO2 has been omitted as attainment is regularly met in the SCAB and few monitoring stations measure SO2 concentrations. 1 The Federal nonattainment designation for lead is only applicable towards the Los Angeles County portion of the SCAB. Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 22 TABLE 2-4: PROJECT AREA AIR QUALITY MONITORING SUMMARY 2018-2020 Pollutant Standard Year 2018 2019 2020 O3 Maximum Federal 1-Hour Concentration (ppm) 0.138 0.127 0.162 Maximum Federal 8-Hour Concentration (ppm) 0.116 0.114 0.128 Number of Days Exceeding State 1-Hour Standard > 0.09 ppm 63 63 89 Number of Days Exceeding State/Federal 8-Hour Standard > 0.070 ppm 102 96 128 CO Maximum Federal 1-Hour Concentration > 35 ppm 2.7 1.3 1.9 Maximum Federal 8-Hour Concentration > 20 ppm 2.5 1.1 1.4 NO2 Maximum Federal 1-Hour Concentration > 0.100 ppm 0.057 0.059 0.054 Annual Federal Standard Design Value 0.016 0.014 0.015 PM10 Maximum Federal 24-Hour Concentration (µg/m3) > 150 µg/m3 129 112 80 Annual Federal Arithmetic Mean (µg/m3) 30.2 29.9 38.7 Number of Days Exceeding Federal 24-Hour Standard > 150 µg/m3 0 0 0 Number of Days Exceeding State 24-Hour Standard > 50 µg/m3 25 36 81 PM2.5 Maximum Federal 24-Hour Concentration (µg/m3) > 35 µg/m3 30.10 34.80 25.70 Annual Federal Arithmetic Mean (µg/m3) > 12 µg/m3 11.17 10.06 11.66 Number of Days Exceeding Federal 24-Hour Standard > 35 µg/m3 0 0 0 ppm = Parts Per Million µg/m3 = Microgram per Cubic Meter Source: Data for O3, CO, NO2, PM10, and PM2.5 was obtained from SCAQMD Air Quality Data Tables. 2.8 REGULATORY BACKGROUND 2.8.1 FEDERAL REGULATIONS The EPA is responsible for setting and enforcing the NAAQS for O3, CO, NOX, SO2, PM10, and Pb (13). The EPA has jurisdiction over emissions sources that are under the authority of the federal government including aircraft, locomotives, and emissions sources outside state waters (Outer Continental Shelf). The EPA also establishes emission standards for vehicles sold in states other than California. Automobiles sold in California must meet the stricter emission requirements of CARB. The Federal Clean Air Act (CAA) was first enacted in 1955 and has been amended numerous times in subsequent years (1963, 1965, 1967, 1970, 1977, and 1990). The CAA establishes the federal air quality standards, the NAAQS, and specifies future dates for achieving compliance (14). The CAA also mandates that states submit and implement SIPs for local areas not meeting these Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 23 standards. These plans must include pollution control measures that demonstrate how the standards would be met. The 1990 amendments to the CAA that identify specific emission reduction goals for areas not meeting the NAAQS require a demonstration of reasonable further progress toward attainment and incorporate additional sanctions for failure to attain or to meet interim milestones. The sections of the CAA most directly applicable to the development of the Project site include Title I (Non-Attainment Provisions) and Title II (Mobile Source Provisions) (15) (16). Title I provisions were established with the goal of attaining the NAAQS for the following criteria pollutants O3, NO2, SO2, PM10, CO, PM2.5, and Pb. The NAAQS were amended in July 1997 to include an additional standard for O3 and to adopt a NAAQS for PM2.5. Table 2-3 (previously presented) provides the NAAQS within the SCAB. Mobile source emissions are regulated in accordance with Title II provisions. These provisions require the use of cleaner burning gasoline and other cleaner burning fuels such as methanol and natural gas. Automobile manufacturers are also required to reduce tailpipe emissions of hydrocarbons and NOX. NOX is a collective term that includes all forms of NOX which are emitted as byproducts of the combustion process. 2.8.2 CALIFORNIA REGULATIONS CARB CARB, which became part of the CalEPA in 1991, is responsible for ensuring implementation of the California Clean Air Act (AB 2595), responding to the federal CAA, and for regulating emissions from consumer products and motor vehicles. AB 2595 mandates achievement of the maximum degree of emissions reductions possible from vehicular and other mobile sources in order to attain the state ambient air quality standards by the earliest practical date. CARB established the CAAQS for all pollutants for which the federal government has NAAQS and, in addition, establishes standards for SO4, visibility, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), and vinyl chloride (C2H3Cl). However, at this time, H2S and C2H3Cl are not measured at any monitoring stations in the SCAB because they are not considered to be a regional air quality problem. Generally, the CAAQS are more stringent than the NAAQS (17) (13). Local air quality management districts, such as the SCAQMD, regulate air emissions from stationary sources such as commercial and industrial facilities. All air pollution control districts have been formally designated as attainment or non-attainment for each CAAQS. Serious non-attainment areas are required to prepare Air Quality Management Plans (AQMP) that include specified emission reduction strategies in an effort to meet clean air goals. These plans are required to include: • Application of Best Available Retrofit Control Technology to existing sources; • Developing control programs for area sources (e.g., architectural coatings and solvents) and indirect sources (e.g., motor vehicle use generated by residential and commercial development); • A District permitting system designed to allow no net increase in emissions from any new or modified permitted sources of emissions; Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 24 • Implementing reasonably available transportation control measures and assuring a substantial reduction in growth rate of vehicle trips and miles traveled; • Significant use of low emissions vehicles by fleet operators; • Sufficient control strategies to achieve a 5% or more annual reduction in emissions or 15% or more in a period of three years for ROGs, NOX, CO and PM10. However, air basins may use alternative emission reduction strategy that achieves a reduction of less than 5% per year under certain circumstances. TITLE 24 ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS AND CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24 Part 6: The California Energy Code was first adopted in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California’s energy consumption. The standards are updated periodically to allow consideration and possible incorporation of new energy efficient technologies and methods. CCR, Title 24, Part 11: California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) is a comprehensive and uniform regulatory code for all residential, commercial, and school buildings that went in effect on January 1, 2009, and is administered by the California Building Standards Commission. CALGreen is updated on a regular basis, with the most recent approved update consisting of the 2019 California Green Building Code Standards that became effective January 1, 2020. Local jurisdictions are permitted to adopt more stringent requirements, as state law provides methods for local enhancements. CALGreen recognizes that many jurisdictions have developed existing construction waste and demolition ordinances and defers to them as the ruling guidance provided they establish a minimum 65% diversion requirement. The code also provides exemptions for areas not served by construction waste and demolition recycling infrastructure. The State Building Code provides the minimum standard that buildings must meet in order to be certified for occupancy, which is generally enforced by the local building official. Energy efficient buildings require less electricity; therefore, increased energy efficiency reduces fossil fuel consumption and decreases greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The 2019 version of Title 24 was adopted by the CEC) and became effective on January 1, 2020. The 2019 Title 24 standards would result in less energy use, thereby reducing air pollutant emissions associated with energy consumption in the SCAB and across the State of California. For example, the 2019 Title 24 standards require solar photovoltaic systems for new homes, establish requirements for newly constructed healthcare facilities, encourage demand responsive technologies for residential buildings, and update indoor and outdoor lighting requirements for nonresidential buildings. The CEC anticipates that single-family homes built with the 2019 standards would use approximately 7% less energy compared to the residential homes built under the 2016 standards. Additionally, after implementation of solar photovoltaic systems, homes built under the 2019 standards would use about 53% less energy than homes built under the 2016 standards. Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 25 Nonresidential buildings (such as the Project) would use approximately 30% less energy due to lighting upgrade requirements (18). Because the Project would be constructed after January 1, 2019, the 2019 CALGreen standards are applicable to the Project and require, among other items (19): • Short-term bicycle parking. If the new project or an additional alteration is anticipated to generate visitor traffic, provide permanently anchored bicycle racks within 200 feet of the visitors’ entrance, readily visible to passers-by, for 5% of new visitor motorized vehicle parking spaces being added, with a minimum of one two-bike capacity rack (5.106.4.1.1). • Long-term bicycle parking. For new buildings with tenant spaces that have 10 or more tenant- occupants, provide secure bicycle parking for 5% of the tenant-occupant vehicular parking spaces with a minimum of one bicycle parking facility (5.106.4.1.2). • Designated parking for clean air vehicles. In new projects or additions to alterations that add 10 or more vehicular parking spaces, provide designated parking for any combination of low- emitting, fuel-efficient and carpool/van pool vehicles as shown in Table 5.106.5.2 (5.106.5.2). • Electric vehicle (EV) charging stations. New construction shall facilitate the future installation of EV supply equipment. The compliance requires empty raceways for future conduit and documentation that the electrical system has adequate capacity for the future load. The number of spaces to be provided for is contained in Table 5.106. 5.3.3 (5.106.5.3). • Outdoor light pollution reduction. Outdoor lighting systems shall be designed to meet the backlight, uplight and glare ratings per Table 5.106.8 (5.106.8) • Construction waste management. Recycle and/or salvage for reuse a minimum of 65% of the nonhazardous construction and demolition waste in accordance with Section • 5.408.1.1. 5.405.1.2, or 5.408.1.3; or meet a local construction and demolition waste management ordinance, whichever is more stringent (5.408.1). • Excavated soil and land clearing debris. 100% of trees, stumps, rocks and associated vegetation and soils resulting primarily from land clearing shall be reused or recycled. For a phased project, such material may be stockpiled on site until the storage site is developed (5.408.3). • Recycling by Occupants. Provide readily accessible areas that serve the entire building and are identified for the depositing, storage, and collection of non-hazardous materials for recycling, including (at a minimum) paper, corrugated cardboard, glass, plastics, organic waste, and metals or meet a lawfully enacted local recycling ordinance, if more restrictive (5.410.1). • Water conserving plumbing fixtures and fittings. Plumbing fixtures (water closets and urinals) and fittings (faucets and showerheads) shall comply with the following: o Water Closets. The effective flush volume of all water closets shall not exceed 1.28 gallons per flush (5.303.3.1) o Urinals. The effective flush volume of wall-mounted urinals shall not exceed 0.125 gallons per flush (5.303.3.2.1). The effective flush volume of floor- mounted or other urinals shall not exceed 0.5 gallons per flush (5.303.3.2.2). o Showerheads. Single showerheads shall have a minimum flow rate of not more than 1.8 gallons per minute and 80 psi (5.303.3.3.1). When a shower is served by more than one showerhead, the combine flow rate of all showerheads and/or other shower outlets controlled by a single valve shall not exceed 1.8 gallons per minute at 80 psi (5.303.3.3.2). Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 26 o Faucets and fountains. Nonresidential lavatory faucets shall have a maximum flow rate of not more than 0.5 gallons per minute at 60 psi (5.303.3.4.1). Kitchen faucets shall have a maximum flow rate of not more than 1.8 gallons per minute of 60 psi (5.303.3.4.2). Wash fountains shall have a maximum flow rate of not more than 1.8 gallons per minute (5.303.3.4.3). Metering faucets shall not deliver more than 0.20 gallons per cycle (5.303.3.4.4). Metering faucets for wash fountains shall have a maximum flow rate not more than 0.20 gallons per cycle (5.303.3.4.5). • Outdoor potable water uses in landscaped areas. Nonresidential developments shall comply with a local water efficient landscape ordinance or the current California Department of Water Resources’ Model Water Efficient (MWELO), whichever is more stringent (5.304.1). • Water meters. Separate submeters or metering devices shall be installed for new buildings or additions in excess of 50,000 sf or for excess consumption where any tenant within a new building or within an addition that is project to consume more than 1,000 gallons per day (5.303.1.1 and 5.303.1.2). • Outdoor water uses in rehabilitated landscape projects equal or greater than 2,500 sf. Rehabilitated landscape projects with an aggregate landscape area equal to or greater than 2,500 sf requiring a building or landscape permit (5.304.3). • Commissioning. For new buildings 10,000 sf and over, building commissioning shall be included in the design and construction processes of the building project to verify that the building systems and components meet the owner’s or owner representative’s project requirements (5.410.2). 2.8.3 AQMP Currently, the NAAQS and CAAQS are exceeded in most parts of the SCAB. In response, the SCAQMD has adopted a series of AQMP to meet the state and federal ambient air quality standards (18). AQMPs are updated regularly in order to more effectively reduce emissions, accommodate growth, and to minimize any negative fiscal impacts of air pollution control on the economy. A detailed discussion on the AQMP and Project consistency with the AQMP is provided in Section 3.10. 2.9 REGIONAL AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT The Project is within the jurisdiction of the SCAQMD. In 1976, California adopted the Lewis Air Quality Management Act which created SCAQMD from a voluntary association of air pollution control districts in Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino counties. The geographic area of which SCAQMD consists of is known as the SCAB. SCAQMD develops comprehensive plans and regulatory programs for the region to attain federal standards by dates specified in federal law. The agency is also responsible for meeting state standards by the earliest date achievable, using reasonably available control measures. SCAQMD rule development through the 1970s and 1980s resulted in dramatic improvement in SCAB air quality. Nearly all control programs developed through the early 1990s relied on (i) the development and application of cleaner technology; (ii) add-on emission controls, and (iii) uniform CEQA review throughout the SCAB. Industrial emission sources have been significantly reduced by this approach and vehicular emissions have been reduced by technologies implemented at the state level by CARB. Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 27 As discussed above, the SCAQMD is the lead agency charged with regulating air quality emission reductions for the entire SCAB. SCAQMD created AQMPs which represent a regional blueprint for achieving healthful air on behalf of the 16 million residents of the SCAB. The 2012 AQMP states, “the remarkable historical improvement in air quality since the 1970’s is the direct result of Southern California’s comprehensive, multiyear strategy of reducing air pollution from all sources as outlined in its AQMPs,” (19). Emissions of O3, NOX, VOC, and CO have been decreasing in the SCAB since 1975 and are projected to continue to decrease through 2020 (20). These decreases result primarily from motor vehicle controls and reductions in evaporative emissions. Although vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in the SCAB continue to increase, NOX and VOC levels are decreasing because of the mandated controls on motor vehicles and the replacement of older polluting vehicles with lower- emitting vehicles. NOX emissions from electric utilities have also decreased due to use of cleaner fuels and renewable energy. O3 contour maps show that the number of days exceeding the 8- hour NAAQS has generally decreased between 1980 and 2020. For 2020, there was an overall decrease in exceedance days compared with the 1980 period. However, as shown on Table 2-5, O3 levels have increased in the past three years due to higher temperatures and stagnant weather conditions. Notwithstanding, O3 levels in the SCAB have decreased substantially over the last 30 years with the current maximum measured concentrations being approximately one-third of concentrations within the late 70’s (21). Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 28 TABLE 2-5: SCAB O3 TREND Source: 2020 SCAQMD, Historical O3 Air Quality Trends (1976-2019) The overall trends of PM10 and PM2.5 levels in the air (not emissions) show an overall improvement since 1975. Direct emissions of PM10 have remained somewhat constant in the SCAB and direct emissions of PM2.5 have decreased slightly since 1975. Area wide sources (fugitive dust from roads, dust from construction, and other sources) contribute the greatest amount of direct particulate matter emissions. As with other pollutants, the most recent PM10 statistics show an overall improvement as illustrated in Tables 2-6 and 2-7. During the period for which data are available, the 24-hour national annual average concentration for PM10 decreased by approximately 46%, from 103.7 microgram per cubic meter (µg/m³) in 1988 to 55.5 µg/m³ in 2020 (22). Although the values are below the federal standard, it should be noted that there are days within the year where the concentrations would exceed the threshold. The 24-hour state annual average for emissions for PM10, have decreased by approximately 64%, from 93.9 µg/m³ in 1989 to 33.9 µg/m³ in 2020 (22). Although data in the late 1990’s show some variability, this is probably due to the advances in meteorological science rather than a change in emissions. Similar to the ambient concentrations, the calculated number of days above the 24-hour PM10 standards has also shown an overall drop. 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 Basin Days Exceeding YEAR 1-Hour Stage 1 Episode 1-Hour Health Advisory 1979 1-Hour NAAQS 1997 8-Hour NAAQS 2008 8-Hour NAAQS 2015 8-Hour NAAQS • • • • • • Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 29 TABLE 2-6: SCAB AVERAGE 24-HOUR CONCENTRATION PM10 TREND (BASED ON FEDERAL STANDARD)1 Source: 2020 CARB, iADAM: Top Four Summary: PM10 24-Hour Averages (1988-2020) 1 Some years have been omitted from the table as insufficient data (or no) data has been reported. Years with reported value of “0” have also been omitted. TABLE 2-7: SCAB ANNUAL AVERAGE CONCENTRATION PM10 TREND (BASED ON STATE STANDARD)1 Source: 2020 CARB, iADAM: Top Four Summary: PM10 24-Hour Averages (1988-2018) 1 Some years have been omitted from the table as insufficient data (or no) data has been reported. Years with reported value of “0” have also been omitted. Tables 2-8 and 2-9 shows the most recent 24-hour average PM2.5 concentrations in the SCAB from 1999 through 2020. Overall, the national and state annual average concentrations have decreased by almost 50% and 31% respectively (22). It should be noted that the SCAB is currently designated as nonattainment for the state and federal PM2.5 standards. 200.0 180.0 160.0 140.0 1 120.0 ....._ .. .:!: 100.0 0 -:ti." 80.0 -" Q. 60.0 "'---.... A _....___ ,., .... T ., T ~ ~ T 40.0 20.0 0.0 --National 24-Hour Average Vear' --Federal Standard 100.0 90.0 80.0 70.0 1 60.0 ....._ 3 50.0 -l 40.0 Q. 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 --State Annual Average Vear' --State Standard Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 30 TABLE 2-8: SCAB 24-HOUR AVERAGE CONCENTRATION PM2.5 TREND (BASED ON FEDERAL STANDARD)1 Source: 2020 CARB, iADAM: Top Four Summary: PM2.5 24-Hour Averages (1999-2018) 1 Some years have been omitted from the table as insufficient data (or no) data has been reported. Years with reported value of “0” have also been omitted. TABLE 2-9: SCAB ANNUAL AVERAGE CONCENTRATION PM2.5 TREND (BASED ON STATE STANDARD)1 Source: 2020 CARB, iADAM: Top Four Summary: PM2.5 24-Hour Averages (1999-2018) 1 Some years have been omitted from the table as insufficient data (or no) data has been reported. Years with reported value of “0” have also been omitted. While the 2012 AQMP PM10 attainment demonstration and the 2015 associated supplemental SIP submission indicated that attainment of the 24-hour standard was predicted to occur by the end of 2015, it could not anticipate the effect of the ongoing drought on the measured PM2.5. so.a 45.0 40.0 35.0 ME 30.0 --l 2s.o -1 Q. 1 'iio 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 30.0 25.0 20.0 .= 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 & ~ ~ ---._._ . - Year1 --Federal 24-Hour Average --Federal Standard & ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y y ◊ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Year' --State Annual Average --State Standard Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 31 The 2006 to 2010 base period used for the 2012 attainment demonstration had near-normal rainfall. While the trend of PM2.5-equivalent emission reductions continued through 2015, the severe drought conditions contributed to the PM2.5 increases observed after 2012. As a result of the disrupted progress toward attainment of the federal 24-hour PM2.5 standard, SCAQMD submitted a request and the EPA approved, in January 2016, a “bump up” to the nonattainment classification from “moderate” to “serious,” with a new attainment deadline as soon as practicable, but not beyond December 31, 2019. As of March 14, 2019, the EPA approved portions of a SIP revision submitted by California to address CAA requirements for the 2006 24- hour PM2.5 NAAQS in the Los Angeles-SCAB Serious PM2.5 nonattainment area. The EPA also approved 2017 and 2019 motor vehicle emissions budgets for transportation conformity purposes and inter-pollutant trading ratios for use in transportation conformity analyses (23). In March 2017, the SCAQMD released the Final 2016 AQMP. The 2016 AQMP continues to evaluate current integrated strategies and control measures to meet the NAAQS, as well as explore new and innovative methods to reach its goals. Some of these approaches include utilizing incentive programs, recognizing existing co-benefit programs from other sectors, and developing a strategy with fair-share reductions at the federal, state, and local levels (24). Similar to the 2012 AQMP, the 2016 AQMP incorporates scientific and technological information and planning assumptions, including the 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (2016-2040 RTP/SCS) and updated emission inventory methodologies for various source categories (18). The 2022 AQMP is currently being developed by SCAQMD to address the EPA’s strengthened ozone standard. Development of the 2022 AQMP is in its early stages and no formal timeline for completion and adoption is currently known. The most recent CO concentrations in the SCAB are shown in Table 2-10 (22). CO concentrations in the SCAB have decreased markedly — a total decrease of more about 80% in the peak 8-hour concentration from 1986 to 2012. It should be noted 2012 is the most recent year where 8-hour CO averages and related statistics are available in the SCAB. The number of exceedance days has also declined. The entire SCAB is now designated as attainment for both the state and national CO standards. Ongoing reductions from motor vehicle control programs should continue the downward trend in ambient CO concentrations. Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 32 TABLE 2-10: SCAB 8-HOUR AVERAGE CONCENTRATION CO TREND1 Source: 2020 CARB, iADAM: Top Four Summary: CO 8-Hour Averages (1999-2018) 1 The most recent year where 8-hour concentration data is available is 2012. Part of the control process of the SCAQMD’s duty to greatly improve the air quality in the SCAB is the uniform CEQA review procedures required by SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook (1993) (1993 CEQA Handbook) (25). The single threshold of significance used to assess Project direct and cumulative impacts has in fact “worked” as evidenced by the track record of the air quality in the SCAB dramatically improving over the course of the past decades. As stated by the SCAQMD, the District’s thresholds of significance are based on factual and scientific data and are therefore appropriate thresholds of significance to use for this Project. The most recent NO2 data for the SCAB is shown in Tables 2-11 and 2-12 (22). Over the last 50 years, NO2 values have decreased significantly; the peak 1-hour national and state averages for 2020 is approximately 80% lower than what it was during 1963. The SCAB attained the State 1- hour NO2 standard in 1994, bringing the entire state into attainment. A new state annual average standard of 0.030 ppm was adopted by CARB in February 2007 (26). The new standard is just barely exceeded in the SCAQMD. NO2 is formed from NOX emissions, which also contribute to O3. As a result, the majority of the future emission control measures would be implemented as part of the overall O3 control strategy. Many of these control measures would target mobile sources, which account for more than three-quarters of California’s NOX emissions. These measures are expected to bring the SCAQMD into attainment of the state annual average standard. 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 CO (ppm)Year Maximum 8-hour CO Averages Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 33 TABLE 2-11: SCAB 1-HOUR AVERAGE CONCENTRATION NO2 TREND (BASED ON FEDERAL STANDARD) Source: 2020 CARB, iADAM: Top Four Summary: CO 1-Hour Averages (1963-2018) TABLE 2-12: SCAB 1-HOUR AVERAGE CONCENTRATION NO2 TREND (BASED ON STATE STANDARD) Source: 2020 CARB, iADAM: Top Four Summary: CO 1-Hour Averages (1963-2018) 2.9.1 TOXIC AIR CONTAMINANTS (TAC) TRENDS In 1984, as a result of public concern for exposure to airborne carcinogens, CARB adopted regulations to reduce the amount of TAC emissions resulting from mobile and area sources, such as cars, trucks, stationary sources, and consumer products. According to the Ambient and Emission Trends of Toxic Air Contaminants in California journal article (27) which was prepared for CARB, results show that between 1990-2012, ambient concentration and emission trends for 800.0 700.0 600.0 500.0 :;;- Q. ~ 400.0 0 z 300.0 200.0 100.0 0.0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :;;- Q. 800.0 700.0 600.0 500.0 ~ 400.0 0 z 300.0 200.0 100.0 0.0 Year -1-Hour Average (National) --Federal Standard 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Year -1-hour average (State) --State Standard Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 34 the seven TACs responsible for most of the known cancer risk associated with airborne exposure in California have declined significantly (between 1990 and 2012). The seven TACs studied include those that are derived from mobile sources: diesel particulate matter (DPM), benzene (C6H6), and 1,3-butadiene (C4H6); those that are derived from stationary sources: perchloroethylene (C2Cl4) and hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)); and those derived from photochemical reactions of emitted VOCs: formaldehyde (CH2O) and acetaldehyde (C2H4O)2. The decline in ambient concentration and emission trends of these TACs are a result of various regulations CARB has implemented to address cancer risk. MOBILE SOURCE TACS CARB introduced two programs that aimed at reducing mobile emissions for light and medium duty vehicles through vehicle emissions controls and cleaner fuel. In California, light-duty vehicles sold after 1996 are equipped with California’s second-generation On-Board Diagnostic (OBD-II) system. The OBD-II system monitors virtually every component that can affect the emission performance of the vehicle to ensure that the vehicle remains as clean as possible over its entire life and assists repair technicians in diagnosing and fixing problems with the computerized engine controls. If a problem is detected, the OBD-II system illuminates a warning lamp on the vehicle instrument panel to alert the driver. This warning lamp typically contains the phrase “Check Engine” or “Service Engine Soon”. The system would also store important information about the detected malfunction so that a repair technician can accurately find and fix the problem. CARB has recently developed similar OBD requirements for heavy-duty vehicles over 14,000 pounds (lbs). CARB’s phase II Reformulated Gasoline Regulation (RFG-2), adopted in 1996, also led to a reduction of mobile source emissions. Through such regulations, benzene levels declined 88% from 1990-2012. 1,3-Butadiene concentrations also declined 85% from 1990-2012 as a result of the use of reformulated gasoline and motor vehicle regulations (27). In 2000, CARB’s Diesel Risk Reduction Plan (DRRP) recommended the replacement and retrofit of diesel-fueled engines and the use of ultra-low-sulfur (<15 ppm) diesel fuel. As a result of these measures, DPM concentrations have declined 68% since 2000, even though the state’s population increased 31% and the amount of diesel vehicles miles traveled increased 81%, as shown on Exhibit 2-B. With the implementation of these diesel-related control regulations, CARB expects a DPM decline of 71% for 2000-2020. 2 It should be noted that ambient DPM concentrations are not measured directly. Rather, a surrogate method using the coefficient of haze (COH) and elemental carbon (EC) is used to estimate DPM concentrations. Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 35 EXHIBIT 2-A: DPM AND DIESEL VEHICLE MILES TREND Source: 2020 CARB DIESEL REGULATIONS CARB and the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach (POLA and POLB) have adopted several iterations of regulations for diesel trucks that are aimed at reducing DPM. More specifically, CARB Drayage Truck Regulation (28), CARB statewide On-road Truck and Bus Regulation (29), and the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach Clean Truck Program (CTP) require accelerated implementation of “clean trucks” into the statewide truck fleet (30). In other words, older more polluting trucks would be replaced with newer, cleaner trucks as a function of these regulatory requirements. Moreover, the average statewide DPM emissions for Heavy Duty Trucks (HDT), in terms of grams of DPM generated per mile traveled, would dramatically be reduced due to the aforementioned regulatory requirements. Diesel emissions identified in this analysis would therefore overstate future DPM emissions since not all the regulatory requirements are reflected in the modeling. CANCER RISK TRENDS Based on information available from CARB, overall cancer risk throughout the SCAB has had a declining trend since 1990. In 1998, following an exhaustive 10-year scientific assessment process, CARB identified particulate matter from diesel-fueled engines as a toxic air contaminant. The SCAQMD initiated a comprehensive urban toxic air pollution study called the Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study (MATES). DPM accounts for more than 70% of the cancer risk. 100% - 00% California Population, Gross State Product (GSP), Diesel Cancer Risk, Diesel V,ehicle-Miles-Traveled (VMT) Diese:IVMT Population Diesel Can,cer Ris 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 36 In January 2018, as part of the overall effort to reduce air toxics exposure in the SCAB, SCAQMD began conducting the MATES V Program. MATES V field measurements were conducted at ten fixed sites (the same sites selected for MATES III and IV) to assess trends in air toxics levels. MATES V also included measurements of ultrafine particles (UFP) and black carbon (BC) concentrations, which can be compared to the UFP levels measured in MATES IV (31). The draft report for the MATES V study was published in late May and the comment submission deadline on June 7, 2021. In addition to new measurements and updated modeling results, several key updates were implemented in MATES V. First, MATES V estimates cancer risks by taking into account multiple exposure pathways, which includes inhalation and non-inhalation pathways. This approach is consistent with how cancer risks are estimated in South Coast AQMD’s programs such as permitting, Air Toxics Hot Spots (AB2588), and CEQA. Previous MATES studies quantified the cancer risks based on the inhalation pathway only. Second, along with cancer risk estimates, MATES V includes information on the chronic non-cancer risks from inhalation and non- inhalation pathways for the first time. Cancer risks and chronic non-cancer risks from MATES II through IV measurements have been re-examined using current Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) and CalEPA risk assessment methodologies and modern statistical methods to examine the trends over time (32). MATES-V calculated cancer risks based on monitoring data collected at ten fixed sites within the SCAB. None of the fixed monitoring sites are within the local area of the Project site. However, MATES-V has extrapolated the excess cancer risk levels throughout the SCAB by modeling the specific grids. The Project is located within a quadrant of the geographic grid of the MATES-V model which predicted a cancer risk of 472 in one million for the area containing the Project site. DPM is included in this cancer risk along with all other TAC sources. As in previous MATES iterations, diesel PM is the largest contributor to overall air toxics cancer risk. However, the average levels of diesel PM in MATES V are 53% lower at the 10 monitoring sites compared to MATES IV. Cumulative Project generated TACs are limited to DPM. Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 37 This page intentionally left blank Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 38 3 PROJECT AIR QUALITY IMPACT 3.1 INTRODUCTION This study quantifies air quality emissions generated by construction and operation of the Project and addresses whether the Project conflicts with implementation of the SCAQMD’s AQMP and Lead Agency planning regulations. The analysis of Project-generated air emissions determines whether the Project would result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the SCAB is in non-attainment under an applicable NAAQS and CAAQS. Additionally, the Project has been evaluated to determine whether the Project would expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations and the impacts of odors. The significance of these potential impacts is described in the following sections. 3.2 STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE The criteria used to determine the significance of potential Project-related air quality impacts are taken from the CEQA Guidelines (14 CCR §§15000, et seq.). Based on these thresholds, a project would result in a significant impact related to air quality if it would (1): • Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan. • Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. • Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. • Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people. The SCAQMD has also developed regional significance thresholds for other regulated pollutants, as summarized at Table 3-1 (33). The SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Significance Thresholds (April 2019) indicate that any projects in the SCAB with daily emissions that exceed any of the indicated thresholds should be considered as having an individually and cumulatively significant air quality impact. TABLE 3-1: MAXIMUM DAILY REGIONAL EMISSIONS THRESHOLDS Pollutant Regional Construction Threshold Regional Operational Thresholds NOX 100 lbs/day 55 lbs/day VOC 75 lbs/day 55 lbs/day PM10 150 lbs/day 150 lbs/day PM2.5 55 lbs/day 55 lbs/day SOX 150 lbs/day 150 lbs/day CO 550 lbs/day 550 lbs/day Pb 3 lbs/day 3 lbs/day lbs/day = Pounds Per Day Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 39 3.3 MODELS EMPLOYED TO ANALYZE AIR QUALITY 3.3.1 CALEEMOD Land uses such as the Project affect air quality through construction-source and operational- source emissions. In May 2021, the SCAQMD, in conjunction with the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) and other California air districts, released the latest version of the CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0. The purpose of this model is to calculate construction-source and operational-source criteria pollutant (VOCs, NOX, SOX, CO, PM10, and PM2.5) and GHG emissions from direct and indirect sources; and quantify applicable air quality and GHG reductions achieved from mitigation (34). Accordingly, the latest version of CalEEMod has been used for this Project to determine construction and operational air quality emissions. Output from the model runs for both construction and operational activity are provided in Appendices 3.1 and 3.4. 3.4 CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS 3.4.1 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES Construction activities associated with the Project would result in emissions of VOCs, NOX, SOX, CO, PM10, and PM2.5. Construction related emissions are expected from the following construction activities: • Demolition/Crushing • Site Preparation • Grading • Building Construction • Paving • Architectural Coating DEMOLITION The site is developed with 65,000 sf of existing buildings and 15,000 tons of asphalt/3,000 tons of concrete. Demolition of the existing structures and asphalt/concrete would generate approximately 100 tons of material. CRUSHING The Project activities would include on-site crushing of asphalt/concrete pulverizing during demolition activity. Fugitive dust emissions would also be generated through the crushing debris on-site. The EPA’s AP-42 compilation of emission factors available in Chapter 11.19.2-2 were used to estimate fugitive dust from crushing activities. As noted above, it is estimated that approximately 18,000 tons of debris would be crushed (900 tons per day). It is estimated that crushing activities would result in 0.49 lbs/day of PM10 emissions and 0.09 lbs/day of PM2.5 emissions. Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 40 GRADING ACTIVITIES Dust is typically a major concern during grading activities. Because such emissions are not amenable to collection and discharge through a controlled source, they are called “fugitive emissions”. Fugitive dust emissions rates vary as a function of many parameters (soil silt, soil moisture, wind speed, area disturbed, number of vehicles, depth of disturbance or excavation, etc.). CalEEMod was utilized to calculate fugitive dust emissions resulting from this phase of activity. This analysis assumes that earthwork activities are expected to balance on site and no import or export of soils would be required. ON-ROAD TRIPS Construction generates on-road vehicle emissions from vehicle usage for workers, hauling, and vendors commuting to and from the site. The number of workers, hauling, and vendor trips are presented below in Table 3-2. It should be noted that for Vendor Trips, specifically, CalEEMod only assigns Vendor Trips to the Building Construction phase. Vendor trips would likely occur during all phases of construction. As such, the CalEEMod defaults for Vendor Trips have been adjusted based on a ratio of the total vendor trips to the number of days of each subphase of activity. TABLE 3-2: CONSTRUCTION TRIP ASSUMPTIONS Phase Name Worker Trips Per Day Vendor Trips Per Day Hauling Trips Per Day Demolition/Crushing 18 9 2 Site Preparation 18 5 0 Grading 20 14 0 Building Construction 339 104 0 Paving 15 0 0 Architectural Coating 68 0 0 3.4.2 CONSTRUCTION DURATION For purposes of analysis, construction of Project is expected to commence in September 2022 and would last through September 2023. The construction schedule utilized in the analysis, shown in Table 3-3, represents a “worst-case” analysis scenario should construction occur any time after the respective dates since emission factors for construction decrease as time passes and the analysis year increases due to emission regulations becoming more stringent3. The duration of construction activity and associated equipment represents a reasonable approximation of the expected construction fleet as required per CEQA Guidelines (1). 3 As shown in the CalEEMod User’s Guide Version 2016.3.2, Section 4.3 “OFFROAD Equipment” as the analysis year increases, emission factors for the same equipment pieces decrease due to the natural turnover of older equipment being replaced by newer less polluting equipment and new regulatory requirements. Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 41 TABLE 3-3: CONSTRUCTION DURATION Phase Name Start Date End Date Days Demolition/Crushing 09/01/2022 09/28/2022 20 Site Preparation 09/29/2022 10/12/2022 10 Grading 10/13/2022 11/23/2022 30 Building Construction 11/24/2022 09/27/2023 220 Paving 08/31/2023 09/27/2023 20 Architectural Coating 08/03/2023 09/27/2023 40 3.4.3 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT Consistent with industry standards and typical construction practices, each piece of equipment listed in Table 3-4 would operate up to a total of eight (8) hours per day, or more than two-thirds of the period during which construction activities are allowed pursuant to the City’s Municipal Code. TABLE 3-4: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ASSUMPTIONS (1 OF 2) Phase Name Equipment1 Amount Hours Per Day Demolition/Crushing Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8 Crushing/Proc. Equipment 1 8 Excavators 3 8 Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8 Site Preparation Crawler Tractors 4 8 Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8 Grading Crawler Tractors 2 8 Excavators 2 8 Graders 1 8 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 Scrapers 2 8 Building Construction Cranes 2 8 Forklifts 5 8 Generator Sets 2 8 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 5 8 Welders 2 8 Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 42 TABLE 3-4: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ASSUMPTIONS (2 OF 2) Phase Name Equipment1 Amount Hours Per Day Paving Pavers 2 8 Paving Equipment 2 8 Rollers 2 8 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 8 1 In order to account for fugitive dust emissions, Crawler Tractors were used in lieu of Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes. 3.4.4 CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS SUMMARY IMPACTS WITHOUT MITIGATION CalEEMod calculates maximum daily emissions for summer and winter periods. As such, the estimated maximum daily construction emissions without mitigation for both summer and winter periods are summarized on Table 3-5. Detailed construction model outputs are presented in Appendix 3.1. Under the assumed scenarios, emissions resulting from the Project construction would exceed criteria pollutant thresholds established by the SCAQMD for emissions VOCs, and mitigation is required. TABLE 3-5: OVERALL CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS SUMMARY – WITHOUT MITIGATION Year Emissions (lbs/day) VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 Summer 2022 4.97 50.68 47.12 0.11 11.51 6.15 2023 81.86 44.95 65.69 0.14 7.40 3.34 Winter 2022 4.90 50.69 44.69 0.10 11.51 6.15 2023 81.80 45.21 62.92 0.14 7.40 3.34 Maximum Daily Emissions 81.86 50.69 65.69 0.14 11.51 6.15 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? YES NO NO NO NO NO Source: CalEEMod construction-source (unmitigated) emissions are presented in Appendix 3.1. IMPACTS WITH MITIGATION The estimated maximum daily construction emissions with mitigation are summarized on Table 3-6. Detailed construction model outputs are presented in Appendix 3.2. MM AQ-1 is necessary to reduce construction impacts to less than significant levels. MM AQ-1 is detailed as follows. Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 43 MM AQ-1 The Project shall utilize “Super-Compliant” low VOC paints for nonresidential interior and exterior surfaces and low VOC paint for parking lot surfaces. Super-Compliant low VOC paints have been reformulated to exceed the regulatory VOC limits put forth by SCAQMD’s Rule 1113. Super- Compliant low VOC paints shall be no more than 10 g/L of VOC. Alternatively, the applicant may utilize tilt-up concrete buildings that do not require the use of architectural coatings. TABLE 3-6: OVERALL CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS SUMMARY – WITH MITIGATION Year Emissions (lbs/day) VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 Summer 2022 4.97 50.68 47.12 0.11 11.51 6.15 2023 50.98 44.95 65.69 0.14 7.40 3.34 Winter 2022 4.90 50.69 44.69 0.10 11.51 6.15 2023 50.91 45.21 62.92 0.14 7.40 3.34 Maximum Daily Emissions 50.98 50.69 65.69 0.14 11.51 6.15 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO Source: CalEEMod construction-source (mitigated) emissions are presented in Appendix 3.2. 3.5 OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS Operational activities associated with the Project would result in emissions of VOCs, NOX, SOX, CO, PM10, and PM2.5. Operational emissions are expected from the following primary sources: • Area Source Emissions • Energy Source Emissions • Mobile Source Emissions • On-Site Cargo Handling Equipment Emissions 3.5.1 AREA SOURCE EMISSIONS ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS Over a period of time the buildings that are part of this Project would require maintenance and would therefore produce emissions resulting from the evaporation of solvents contained in paints, varnishes, primers, and other surface coatings. The emissions associated with architectural coatings were calculated using CalEEMod. Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 44 CONSUMER PRODUCTS Consumer products include, but are not limited to detergents, cleaning compounds, polishes, personal care products, and lawn and garden products. Many of these products contain organic compounds which when released in the atmosphere can react to form ozone and other photochemically reactive pollutants. The emissions associated with use of consumer products were calculated based on defaults provided within CalEEMod. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT Landscape maintenance equipment would generate emissions from fuel combustion and evaporation of unburned fuel. Equipment in this category would include lawnmowers, shedders/grinders, blowers, trimmers, chain saws, and hedge trimmers used to maintain the landscaping of the Project. The emissions associated with landscape maintenance equipment were calculated based on assumptions provided in CalEEMod. 3.5.2 ENERGY SOURCE EMISSIONS COMBUSTION EMISSIONS ASSOCIATED WITH NATURAL GAS AND ELECTRICITY Electricity and natural gas are used by almost every project. Criteria pollutant emissions are emitted through the generation of electricity and consumption of natural gas. However, because electrical generating facilities for the Project area are located either outside the region (state) or offset through the use of pollution credits (RECLAIM) for generation within the SCAB, criteria pollutant emissions from offsite generation of electricity are generally excluded from the evaluation of significance and only natural gas use is considered. The emissions associated with natural gas use were calculated using CalEEMod. 3.5.3 MOBILE SOURCE EMISSIONS The Project related operational air quality emissions derive primarily from vehicle trips generated by the Project, including employee trips to and from the site and truck trips associated with the proposed uses. Trip characteristics available from the Fontana Corporate Center Traffic Study were utilized in this analysis (4). The Project is expected to generate a total of approximately 622 two-way vehicular trips per day (311 inbound and 311 outbound) which includes 170 two-way truck trips per day (85 inbound and 85 outbound) (4). APPROACH FOR ANALYSIS OF THE PROJECT To determine emissions from passenger car vehicles, the CalEEMod defaults were utilized for trip length and trip purpose for the proposed industrial land uses. For the proposed industrial uses, it is important to note that although the Fontana Corporate Center Traffic Study does not breakdown passenger cars by type, this analysis assumes that passenger cars include Light-Duty- Auto vehicles (LDA), Light-Duty-Trucks (LDT14 & LDT25), Medium-Duty-Vehicles (MDV), and 4 Vehicles under the LDT1 category have a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of less than 6,000 lbs. and equivalent test weight (ETW) of less than or equal to 3,750 lbs. 5 Vehicles under the LDT2 category have a GVWR of less than 6,000 lbs. and ETW between 3,751 lbs. and 5,750 lbs. Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 45 Motorcycles (MCY) vehicle types. To account for emissions generated by passenger cars, the following fleet mix was utilized in this analysis: TABLE 3-7: PASSENGER CAR FLEET MIX Land Use Vehicle Type % Warehouse LDA 57.81 LDT1 6.00 LDT2 18.53 MDV 14.94 MCY 2.72 Note: The Project-specific passenger car fleet mix used in this analysis is based on a proportional split utilizing the default CalEEMod percentages assigned to LDA, LDT1, LDT2, and MDV vehicle types. To determine emissions from trucks for the proposed industrial uses, the analysis incorporated the SCAQMD recommended truck trip length of 40 miles6 and an assumption of 100% primary trips for the proposed industrial land uses. In order to be consistent with the Fontana Corporate Center Traffic Study, trucks are broken down by truck type. The truck fleet mix is estimated by rationing the trip rates for each truck type based on information provided in the Fontana Corporate Center Traffic Study. Heavy trucks are broken down by truck type (or axle type) and are categorized as either Light-Heavy-Duty Trucks (LHDT17 & LHDT2 8)/2-axle, Medium-Heavy- Duty Trucks (MHDT)/3-axle, and HHDT/4+-axle. To account for emissions generated by trucks, the following fleet mix was utilized in this analysis: TABLE 3-8: TRUCK FLEET MIX Land Use Vehicle Type % Warehouse LHDT1 13.00 LHDT2 3.47 MHDT 21.18 HHDT 62.35 Note: Project-specific truck fleet mix is based on the number of trips generated by each truck type (LHDT1, LHDT2, MHDT, and HHDT) relative to the total number of truck trips. FUGITIVE DUST RELATED TO VEHICULAR TRAVEL Vehicles traveling on paved roads would be a source of fugitive emissions due to the generation of road dust inclusive of break and tire wear particulates. The emissions estimate for travel on paved roads were calculated using CalEEMod. 6 The average trip length for heavy trucks were based on the SCAQMD documents for the implementation of the Facility-Based Mobile Source Measures (FBMSMs) adopted in the 2016 AQMP. SCAQMD’s “Preliminary Warehouse Emission Calculations” cites 39.9-mile trip length for heavy-heavy trucks (41). As a conservative measure, a trip length of 40 miles has been utilized for all trucks for the purpose of this analysis (39) 7 Vehicles under the LHDT1 category have a GVWR of 8,501 to 10,000 lbs. 8 Vehicles under the LHDT2 category have a GVWR of 10,001 to 14,000 lbs. Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 46 3.5.4 ON-SITE CARGO HANDLING EQUIPMENT EMISSIONS It is common for industrial warehouse buildings to require cargo handling equipment to move empty containers and empty chassis to and from the various pieces of cargo handling equipment that receive and distribute containers. For this particular Project, on-site modeled operational equipment includes up to two (2) 200 horsepower (hp), compressed natural gas or gasoline- powered tractors/loaders/backhoes operating at 4 hours a day for 365 days of the year. 3.5.5 OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS SUMMARY EXISTING EMISSIONS The site is currently occupied by a plant for a manufacturer of prefabricated building systems located at 13592 Slover Avenue in the City of Fontana. The estimated operation-source emissions from the existing development are summarized on Table 3-9. Detailed operation model outputs are presented in Appendix 3.3. TABLE 3-9: EMISSIONS FROM EXISTING DEVELOPMENT Source Emissions (lbs/day) VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 Summer Area Source 1.77 1.40E-04 0.02 0.00 5.00E-05 5.00E-05 Energy Source 0.06 0.56 0.47 3.39E-03 0.04 0.04 Mobile Source 1.08 3.74 11.99 0.04 3.09 0.86 Total Maximum Daily Emissions 2.92 4.31 12.48 0.04 3.13 0.90 Winter Area Source 1.77 1.40E-04 0.02 0.00 5.00E-05 5.00E-05 Energy Source 0.06 0.56 0.47 3.39E-03 0.04 0.04 Mobile Source 0.97 3.94 10.66 0.04 3.09 0.86 Total Maximum Daily Emissions 2.80 4.51 11.14 0.04 3.13 0.90 Source: CalEEMod existing operational-source emissions are presented in Appendix 3.3. PROPOSED PROJECT EMISSIONS As previously stated, CalEEMod utilizes summer and winter EMFAC2017 emission factors in order to derive vehicle emissions as sociated with Project operational activities, which vary by season. The estimated operational-source emissions are summarized on Tables 3-10. It should be noted that the existing development emissions were subtracted from the Project operational emissions to determine the new emissions from the proposed Project. Detailed operation model outputs for the Project are presented in Appendix 3.4. As shown on Table 3-10, the Project’s daily regional emissions from on-going operations would not exceed the thresholds of significance for emissions of any criteria pollutant. Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 47 TABLE 3-10: SUMMARY OF PEAK OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS Source Emissions (lbs/day) VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 Summer Area Source 8.11 1.28E-03 0.14 1.00E-05 5.00E-04 5.00E-04 Energy Source 0.02 0.19 0.16 1.15E-03 0.01 0.01 Mobile Source 2.36 28.60 27.03 0.20 10.42 3.08 On-Site Equipment Source 0.22 2.07 1.50 6.33E-03 0.08 0.07 Total Maximum Daily Emissions 10.72 30.86 28.83 0.20 10.51 3.16 Existing Emissions 2.92 4.31 12.48 0.04 3.13 0.90 Net Emissions (Project – Existing) 7.80 26.55 16.35 0.16 7.38 2.26 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO Winter Area Source 8.11 1.28E-03 0.14 1.00E-05 5.00E-04 5.00E-04 Energy Source 0.02 0.19 0.16 1.15E-03 0.01 0.01 Mobile Source 2.14 30.05 24.70 0.19 10.42 3.08 On-Site Equipment Source 0.22 2.07 1.50 6.33E-03 0.08 0.07 Total Maximum Daily Emissions 10.49 32.32 26.50 0.20 10.51 3.16 Existing Emissions 2.80 4.51 11.14 0.04 3.13 0.90 Net Emissions (Project – Existing) 7.69 27.81 15.35 0.16 7.38 2.26 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO Source: CalEEMod operational-source emissions are presented in Appendix 3.4. 3.6 LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE BACKGROUND ON LST DEVELOPMENT The analysis makes use of methodology included in the SCAQMD Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (LST Methodology). The SCAQMD has established that impacts to air quality are significant if there is a potential to contribute or cause localized exceedances of the federal and/or state ambient air quality standards (NAAQS/CAAQS). Collectively, these are referred to as Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs). Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 48 The SCAQMD established LSTs in response to the SCAQMD Governing Board’s Environmental Justice Initiative I-49. LSTs represent the maximum emissions from a project that would not cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard at the nearest residence or sensitive receptor. The SCAQMD states that lead agencies can use the LSTs as another indicator of significance in its air quality impact analyses. LSTs were developed in response to environmental justice and health concerns raised by the public regarding exposure of individuals to criteria pollutants in local communities. To address the issue of localized significance, the SCAQMD adopted LSTs that show whether a project would cause or contribute to localized air quality impacts and thereby cause or contribute to potential localized adverse health effects. The analysis makes use of methodology included in the LST Methodology (35). APPLICABILITY OF LSTS FOR THE PROJECT For this Project, the appropriate SRA for the LST analysis is the SCAQMD Central San Bernardino Valley 2 (SRA 34). LSTs apply to CO, NO2, PM10, and PM2.5. The SCAQMD produced look-up tables for projects less than or equal to 5 acres in size. In order to determine the appropriate methodology for determining localized impacts that could occur as a result of Project-related construction, the following process is undertaken: • Identify the maximum daily on-site emissions that would occur during construction activity: o The maximum daily on-site emissions could be based on information provided by the Project Applicant; or o The SCAQMD’s Fact Sheet for Applying CalEEMod to Localized Significance Thresholds and CalEEMod User’s Guide Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMod can be used to determine the maximum site acreage that is actively disturbed based on the construction equipment fleet and equipment hours as estimated in CalEEMod (36) (37). • If the total acreage disturbed is less than or equal to 5 acres per day, then the SCAQMD’s screening look-up tables are utilized to determine if a Project has the potential to result in a significant impact. The look-up tables establish a maximum daily emissions threshold in lbs/day that can be compared to CalEEMod outputs. • If the total acreage disturbed is greater than 5 acres per day, then LST impacts may still be conservatively evaluated using the LST look-up tables for a 5-acre disturbance area. Use of the 5- acre disturbance area thresholds can be used to show that even if the daily emissions from all construction activity were emitted within a 5-acre area, and therefore concentrated over a smaller area which would result in greater site adjacent concentrations, the impacts would still be less than significant if the applicable 5-acre thresholds are utilized. • The LST Methodology presents mass emission rates for each SRA, project sizes of 1, 2, and 5 acres, and nearest receptor distances of 25, 50, 100, 200, and 500 meters. For project sizes between the 9 The purpose of SCAQMD’s Environmental Justice program is to ensure that everyone has the right to equal protection from air pollution and fair access to the decision-making process that works to improve the quality of air within their communities. Further, the SCAQMD defines Environmental Justice as “…equitable environmental policymaking and enforcement to protect the health of all residents, regardless of age, culture, ethnicity, gender, race, socioeconomic status, or geographic location, from the health effects of air pollution.” Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 49 values given, or with receptors at distances between the given receptors, the methodology uses linear interpolation to determine the thresholds. EMISSIONS CONSIDERED Based on SCAQMD’s LST Methodology, emissions for concern during construction activities are on-site NOX, CO, PM2.5, and PM10. The LST Methodology clearly states that “off-site mobile emissions from the Project should not be included in the emissions compared to LSTs (38).” As such, for purposes of the construction LST analysis, only emissions included in the CalEEMod “on- site” emissions outputs were considered. MAXIMUM DAILY DISTURBED-ACREAGE As a conservative measure, it is assumed that a maximum of 5 acres per day can be actively disturbed during construction of the site. In CalEEMod, the Total Acres Graded (TAG) field represents the cumulative distance traversed on the property by the grading equipment. In order to properly grade a piece of land, multiple passes with grading equipment may be required. So even though the lot size is a fixed number of acres, the TAG could be an order of magnitude higher than the footprint of the lot (37). Total Acres Graded (TAG) is a function of the maximum acreage disturbed per day times the number of days of the subphase of construction. As such, the TAG field in CalEEMod has been revised to 50 acres (5 acres per day x 10 days) for site preparation and 150 acres (5 acres per day x 30 days) for grading.10 RECEPTORS As previously stated, LSTs represent the maximum emissions from a project that would not cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable NAAQS and CAAQS at the nearest residence or sensitive receptor. Receptor locations are off-site locations where individuals may be exposed to emissions from Project activities. Some people are especially sensitive to air pollution and are given special consideration when evaluating air quality impacts from projects. These groups of people include children, the elderly, and individuals with pre-existing respiratory or cardiovascular illness. Structures that house these persons or places where they gather are defined as “sensitive receptors”. These structures typically include uses such as residences, hotels, and hospitals where an individual can remain for 24 hours. Consistent with the LST Methodology, the nearest land use where an individual could remain for 24 hours to the Project site has been used to determine construction and operational air quality impacts for emissions of PM10 and PM2.5, since PM10 and PM2.5 thresholds are based on a 24-hour averaging time. LSTs apply, even for non-sensitive land uses, consistent with LST Methodology and SCAQMD guidance. Per the LST Methodology, commercial and industrial facilities are not included in the definition of sensitive receptor because employees and patrons do not typically remain onsite for a full 24 hours but are typically onsite for 8 hours or less. However, LST Methodology explicitly states that “LSTs based on shorter averaging periods, such as the NO2 and CO LSTs, could also be 10 CalEEMod does not provide a “Total Acres Graded” field for Demolition, Building Construction, Paving, or Architectural Coating activities. Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 50 applied to receptors such as industrial or commercial facilities since it is reasonable to assume that a worker at these sites could be present for periods of one to eight hours (38).” Therefore, any adjacent land use where an individual could remain for 1 or 8-hours, that is located at a closer distance to the Project site than the receptor used for PM10 and PM2.5 analysis, must be considered to determine construction and operational LST air impacts for emissions of NO2 and CO since these pollutants have an averaging time of 1 and 8-hours. PROJECT-RELATED RECEPTORS Receptors in the Project study area are described below and shown on Exhibit 3-A. Localized air quality impacts were evaluated at sensitive receptor land uses nearest the Project site. All distances are measured from the Project site boundary to the outdoor living areas (e.g., backyards) or at the building façade, whichever is closer to the Project site. The selection of receptor locations is based on Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) guidelines and is consistent with additional guidance provided by Caltrans and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). R1: Location R1 represents the existing residence at 10463 Calabash Avenue, approximately 2,198 feet east of the Project site. Since there are no private outdoor living areas (backyards) facing the Project site, receptor R1 is placed at the building façade. R2: Location R2 represents the existing residence at 10709 Calabash Avenue, approximately 2,602 feet southeast of the Project site. Since there are no private outdoor living areas (backyards) facing the Project site, receptor R2 is placed at the building façade. R3: Location R3 represents the existing residence at 10931 Calabash Avenue, approximately 3,626 feet southeast of the Project site. Since there are no private outdoor living areas (backyards) facing the Project site, receptor R3 is placed at the building façade. R4: Location R4 represents the Patrick Industries, Inc. facility at 13414 Slover Avenue, approximately 97 feet west of the Project site. The SCAQMD recommends that the nearest sensitive receptor be considered when determining the Project’s potential to cause an individual a cumulatively significant impact. The nearest land use where an individual could remain for 24 hours to the Project site has been used to determine localized construction and operational air quality impacts for emissions of PM10 and PM2.5 (since PM10 and PM2.5 thresholds are based on a 24-hour averaging time). The nearest receptor used for evaluation of localized impacts of PM10 and PM2.5 is the existing residence located at 10463 Calabash Avenue, approximately 2,198 feet (670 meters) east of the Project site. It should be noted that the look-up tables only identify thresholds up to a 500-meter distance. As a conservative measure, a 500-meter distance will be used. As previously stated, and consistent with LST Methodology, the nearest industrial/commercial use to the Project site is used to determine construction and operational LST air impacts for emissions of NOX and CO as the averaging periods for these pollutants are shorter (8 hours or less) and it is reasonable to assumed that an individual could be present at these sites for periods of one to 8 hours. The nearest receptor used for evaluation of localized impacts of NOX and CO is the is the Patrick Industrial, Inc. facility, located at 13414 Slover Avenue, approximately 97 feet (30 meters) west of the Project site. Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 51 EXHIBIT 3-A: RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ~ LEGEND: f ~ Receptor Locations -• Distance from receptor to Project site boundary (in feet) Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 52 3.7 CONSTRUCTION-SOURCE EMISSIONS LST ANALYSIS 3.7.1 LOCALIZED THRESHOLDS FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY Although the total acreage disturbed is more than 5 acres per day for construction activities, the LST Methodology provides look-up tables for sites with an area with daily disturbance of 5 acres or less. For projects that exceed 5 acres, the 5-acre LST look-up tables can be used as a screening tool to determine which pollutants require additional detailed analysis. This approach is conservative as it assumes that all on-site emissions associated with the Project would occur within a concentrated 5-acre area. This screening method would therefore over-predict potential localized impacts, because by assuming that on-site construction activities are occurring over a smaller area, the resulting concentrations of air pollutants are more highly concentrated once they reach the smaller site boundary than they would be for activities if they were spread out over a larger surface area. On a larger site, the same amount of air pollutants generated would disperse over a larger surface area and would result in a lower concentration once emissions reach the Project-site boundary. As such, LSTs for a 5-acre site during construction are used as a screening tool to determine if further detailed analysis is required. The thresholds used in for the construction-source LST analysis are presented below in Table 3-11. TABLE 3-11: MAXIMUM DAILY LOCALIZED CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS THRESHOLDS Pollutant Construction Localized Thresholds NOX 270 lbs/day CO 1,746 lbs/day PM10 229 lbs/day PM2.5 120 lbs/day Source: Localized Thresholds presented in this table are based on the SCAQMD Final LST Methodology, July 2008 3.7.2 CONSTRUCTION-SOURCE LOCALIZED EMISSIONS IMPACTS WITHOUT MITIGATION Table 3-12 identifies the localized impacts at the nearest receptor location in the vicinity of the Project. Without mitigation, localized construction emissions would not exceed the applicable SCAQMD LSTs for emissions of any criterial pollutant. Outputs from the model runs for unmitigated construction LSTs are provided in Appendix 3.1. Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 53 TABLE 3-12: LOCALIZED CONSTRUCTION-SOURCE EMISSIONS – WITHOUT MITIGATION On-Site Emissions Emissions (lbs/day) NOX CO PM10 PM2.5 Demolition/Crushing Maximum Daily Emissions 28.94 24.93 1.95 1.43 SCAQMD Localized Threshold 270 1,746 229 120 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO Site Preparation Maximum Daily Emissions 50.41 20.01 11.27 6.08 SCAQMD Localized Threshold 270 1,746 229 120 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO Grading Maximum Daily Emissions 47.51 29.20 6.32 3.27 SCAQMD Localized Threshold 270 1,746 229 120 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO Building Construction Maximum Daily Emissions 30.80 31.49 1.57 1.48 SCAQMD Localized Threshold 270 1,746 229 120 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO Paving Maximum Daily Emissions 10.19 14.58 0.51 0.47 SCAQMD Localized Threshold 270 1,746 229 120 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO Architectural Coating Maximum Daily Emissions 1.74 2.41 0.09 0.09 SCAQMD Localized Threshold 270 1,746 229 120 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO Source: CalEEMod unmitigated localized construction-source emissions are presented in Appendix 3.1. 3.8 OPERATIONAL-SOURCE EMISSIONS LST ANALYSIS The Project is located on an approximately 20.99-acre parcel. As noted previously, the LST Methodology provides look-up tables for sites with an area with daily disturbance of 5 acres or less. For projects that exceed 5 acres, the 5-acre LST look-up tables can be used as a screening tool to determine whether pollutants require additional detailed analysis. This approach is conservative as it assumes that all on-site emissions associated with the project would occur within a concentrated 5-acre area. This screening method would therefore over-predict potential localized impacts, because by assuming that on-site operational activities are occurring over a Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 54 smaller area, the resulting concentrations of air pollutants are more highly concentrated once they reach the smaller site boundary than they would be for activities if they were spread out over a larger surface area. On a larger site, the same amount of air pollutants generated would disperse over a larger surface area and would result in a lower concentration once emissions reach the project-site boundary. As such, LSTs for a 5-acre site during operations are used as a screening tool to determine if further detailed analysis is required. The LST analysis generally includes on-site sources (area, energy, mobile, and on-site cargo handling equipment – are previously discussed in Section 3.5 of this report). However, it should be noted that the CalEEMod outputs do not separate on-site and off-site emissions from mobile sources. As such, in an effort to establish a maximum potential impact scenario for analytic purposes, the emissions shown on Table 3-14 represent all on-site Project-related stationary (area) sources and 5% of the Project-related mobile sources. Considering that the trip length used in CalEEMod for the Project is approximately 16.6 miles for passenger cars and 40.0 miles for all trucks, 5% of this total would represent an on-site travel distance of approximately 0.8 mile/4,382 feet for passenger cars and 2 miles/10,560 feet for trucks. It should be noted that the longest on- site distance is roughly 0.5 mile for both trucks and passenger cars. As such, the 5% assumption is conservative and would tend to overstate the actual impact because it is not likely that a passenger car would drive 0.8 mile on the site or that a truck would drive 2 miles on the site. Modeling based on these assumptions demonstrates that even within broad encompassing parameters, Project operational-source emissions would not exceed applicable LSTs. 3.8.1 LOCALIZED THRESHOLDS FOR OPERATIONAL ACTIVITY As previously stated, LSTs for a 5-acre site during operations are used as a screening tool to determine if further detailed analysis is required. TABLE 3-13: MAXIMUM DAILY LOCAL IZED OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS THRESHOLDS Pollutant Operational Localized Thresholds NOX 270 lbs/day CO 1,746 lbs/day PM10 55 lbs/day PM2.5 29 lbs/day Source: Localized Thresholds presented in this table are based on the SCAQMD Final LST Methodology, July 2008 3.8.2 OPERATIONAL-SOURCE LOCALIZED EMISSIONS As shown on Table 3-14 operational emissions would not exceed the LST thresholds for the nearest sensitive receptor. Therefore, the Project would have a less than significant localized impact during operational activity. Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 55 TABLE 3-14: LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS On-Site Emissions Emissions (lbs/day) NOX CO PM10 PM2.5 Maximum Daily Emissions 3.77 3.15 0.61 0.24 SCAQMD Localized Threshold 270 1,746 55 29 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO Source: CalEEMod localized operational-source emissions are presented in Appendix 3.4. 3.9 CO “HOT SPOT” ANALYSIS As discussed below, the Project would not result in potentially adverse CO concentrations or “hot spots.” Further, detailed modeling of Project-specific CO “hot spots” is not needed to reach this conclusion. An adverse CO concentration, known as a “hot spot”, would occur if an exceedance of the state one-hour standard of 20 ppm or the eight-hour standard of 9 ppm were to occur. It has long been recognized that CO hotspots are caused by vehicular emissions, primarily when idling at congested intersections. In response, vehicle emissions standards have become increasingly stringent in the last twenty years. Currently, the allowable CO emissions standard in California is a maximum of 3.4 grams/mile for passenger cars (there are requirements for certain vehicles that are more stringent). With the turnover of older vehicles, introduction of cleaner fuels, and implementation of increasingly sophisticated and efficient emissions control technologies, CO concentration in the SCAB is now designated as attainment. To establish a more accurate record of baseline CO concentrations affecting the SCAB, a CO “hot spot” analysis was conducted in 2003 for four busy intersections in Los Angeles at the peak morning and afternoon time periods. This “hot spot” analysis did not predict any violation of CO standards, as shown on Table 3-15. TABLE 3-15: CO MODEL RESULTS Intersection Location CO Concentrations (ppm) Morning 1-hour Afternoon 1-hour 8-hour Wilshire Boulevard/Veteran Avenue 4.6 3.5 3.7 Sunset Boulevard/Highland Avenue 4 4.5 3.5 La Cienega Boulevard/Century Boulevard 3.7 3.1 5.2 Long Beach Boulevard/Imperial Highway 3 3.1 8.4 Notes: Federal 1-hour standard is 35 ppm and the deferral 8-hour standard is 9.0 ppm. Based on the SCAQMD's 2003 AQMP and the 1992 Federal Attainment Plan for Carbon Monoxide (1992 CO Plan), peak carbon monoxide concentrations in the SCAB were a result of unusual meteorological and topographical conditions and not a result of traffic volumes and congestion at a particular intersection. As evidence of this, for example, 8.4 ppm 8-hr CO concentration measured at the Long Beach Blvd. and Imperial Hwy. intersection (highest CO generating Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 56 intersection within the “hot spot” analysis), only 0.7 ppm was attributable to the traffic volumes and congestion at this intersection; the remaining 7.7 ppm were due to the ambient air measurements at the time the 2003 AQMP was prepared (39). In contrast, an adverse CO concentration, known as a “hot spot”, would occur if an exceedance of the state one-hour standard of 20 parts per million (ppm) or the eight-hour standard of 9 ppm were to occur. The ambient 1-hr and 8-hr CO concentration within the Project study area is estimated to be 1.9 ppm and 1.4 ppm, respectively (data from Central San Bernardino Valley 2 station for 2020). Therefore, even if the traffic volumes for the proposed Project were double or even triple of the traffic volumes generated at the Long Beach Blvd. and Imperial Hwy. intersection, coupled with the on-going improvements in ambient air quality, the Project would not be capable of resulting in a CO “hot spot” at any study area intersections. Similar considerations are also employed by other Air Districts when evaluating potential CO concentration impacts. More specifically, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) concludes that under existing and future vehicle emission rates, a given project would have to increase traffic volumes at a single intersection by more than 44,000 vehicles per hour (vph)—or 24,000 vph where vertical and/or horizontal air does not mix—in order to generate a significant CO impact (40). Traffic volumes generating the CO concentrations for the “hot spot” analysis is shown on Table 3-16. The busiest intersection evaluated was that at Wilshire Boulevard and Veteran Avenue, which has a daily traffic volume of approximately 100,000 vph and AM/PM traffic volumes of 8,062 vph and 7,719 vph respectively (39). The 2003 AQMP estimated that the 1-hour concentration for this intersection was 4.6 ppm; this indicates that, should the daily traffic volume increase four times to 400,000 vehicles per day, CO concentrations (4.6 ppm x 4= 18.4 ppm) would still not likely exceed the most stringent 1-hour CO standard (20.0 ppm)11. TABLE 3-16: TRAFFIC VOLUMES Intersection Location Peak Traffic Volumes (vph) Eastbound (AM/PM) Westbound (AM/PM) Southbound (AM/PM) Northbound (AM/PM) Total (AM/PM) Wilshire Boulevard/Veteran Avenue 4,954/2,069 1,830/3,317 721/1,400 560/933 8,062/7,719 Sunset Boulevard/Highland Avenue 1,417/1,764 1,342/1,540 2,304/1,832 1,551/2,238 6,614/5,374 La Cienega Boulevard/Century Boulevard 2,540/2,243 1,890/2,728 1,384/2,029 821/1,674 6,634/8,674 Long Beach Boulevard/Imperial Highway 1,217/2,020 1,760/1,400 479/944 756/1,150 4,212/5,514 As shown on Table 3-17, the highest trips on a segment of road for the proposed Project during AM and PM traffic is 1,601 vph and 1,968 vph, respectively, on Mulberry Avenue and Slover Avenue (4). As such, Project-related traffic volumes are less than the traffic volumes identified in the 2003 AQMP. The Project considered herein would not produce the volume of traffic required 11 Based on the ratio of the CO standard (20.0 ppm) and the modeled value (4.6 ppm) Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 57 to generate a CO “hot spot” either in the context of the 2003 Los Angeles hot spot study or based on representative BAAQMD CO threshold considerations. Therefore, CO “hot spots” are not an environmental impact of concern for the Project. Localized air quality impacts related to mobile- source emissions would therefore be less than significant. TABLE 3-17: PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES Intersection Location Peak Traffic Volumes (vph) Northbound (AM/PM) Southbound (AM/PM) Eastbound (AM/PM) Westbound (AM/PM) Total (AM/PM) Commerce Way/Slover Avenue 31/63 0/0 693/713 626/911 1,350/1,687 Driveway 1/Slover Avenue 0/0 2/8 670/730 630/909 1,301/1,647 Driveway 4/Business Drive/ Slover Avenue 29/130 4/13 663/740 693/854 1,388/1,737 Mulberry Avenue/Slover Avenue 300/337 0/0 607/797 695/834 1,601/1,968 Source: Fontana Corporate Center Project Traffic Study 3.10 AQMP The Project site is located within the SCAB, which is characterized by relatively poor air quality. The SCAQMD has jurisdiction over an approximately 10,743 square-mile area consisting of the four-county Basin and the Los Angeles County and Riverside County portions of what use to be referred to as the Southeast Desert Air Basin. In these areas, the SCAQMD is principally responsible for air pollution control, and works directly with the SCAG, county transportation commissions, local governments, as well as state and federal agencies to reduce emissions from stationary, mobile, and indirect sources to meet state and federal ambient air quality standards. Currently, these state and federal air quality standards are exceeded in most parts of the SCAB. In response, the SCAQMD has adopted a series of AQMPs to meet the state and federal ambient air quality standards. AQMPs are updated regularly in order to more effectively reduce emissions, accommodate growth, and to minimize any negative fiscal impacts of air pollution control on the economy. In March 2017, the SCAQMD released the Final 2016 AQMP (2016 AQMP). The 2016 AQMP continues to evaluate current integrated strategies and control measures to meet the NAAQS, as well as explore new and innovative methods to reach its goals. Some of these approaches include utilizing incentive programs, recognizing existing co-benefit programs from other sectors, and developing a strategy with fair-share reductions at the federal, state, and local levels (41). Similar to the 2012 AQMP, the 2016 AQMP incorporates scientific and technological information and planning assumptions, including the 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (2016-2040 RTP/SCS), a planning document that supports the integration of land use and transportation to help the region meet the federal CAA requirements (18). The Project’s consistency with the AQMP will be determined using the 2016 AQMP as discussed below. Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 58 Criteria for determining consistency with the AQMP are defined in Chapter 12, Section 12.2 and Section 12.3 of the 1993 CEQA Handbook (42). These indicators are discussed below: 3.10.1 CONSISTENCY CRITERION NO. 1 The proposed Project will not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations or delay the timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emissions reductions specified in the AQMP. The violations that Consistency Criterion No. 1 refer to are the CAAQS and NAAQS. CAAQS and NAAQS violations would occur if regional or localized significance thresholds were exceeded. Construction Impacts – Consistency Criterion 1 Consistency Criterion No. 1 refers to violations of the CAAQS and NAAQS. CAAQS and NAAQS violations would occur if regional or localized significance thresholds were exceeded. As evaluated, the Project’s regional and localized construction-source emissions would not exceed applicable significance thresholds after implementation of mitigation. As such, a less than significant impact is expected. Operational Impacts – Consistency Criterion 1 As evaluated, the Project would not exceed the applicable regional and localized significance thresholds for operational activity. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with the AQMP according to this criterion. On the basis of the preceding discussion, the Project is determined to be consistent with the first criterion. 3.10.2 CONSISTENCY CRITERION NO. 2 The Project will not exceed the assumptions in the AQMP based on the years of Project build- out phase. The 2016 AQMP demonstrates that the applicable ambient air quality standards can be achieved within the timeframes required under federal law. Growth projections from local general plans adopted by cities in the district are provided to the SCAG, which develops regional growth forecasts, which are then used to develop future air quality forecasts for the AQMP. Development consistent with the growth projections in City of Fontana General Plan is considered to be consistent with the AQMP. Construction Impacts – Consistency Criterion 2 Peak day emissions generated by construction activities are largely independent of land use assignments, but rather are a function of development scope and maximum area of disturbance. Irrespective of the site’s land use designation, development of the site to its maximum potential would likely occur, with disturbance of the entire site occurring during construction activities. As such, when considering that no emissions thresholds will be exceeded, a less than significant impact would result. Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 59 Operational Impacts – Consistency Criterion 2 The Project is located within the Fontana Gateway Specific Plan area. The Fontana Gateway Specific Plan is primarily a planned industrial land use encompassing approximately 755 acres in the urbanizing area of southwest Fontana. The project would create a major new employment center, providing jobs for existing city residents and new residents of nearby planned residential communities. The proposed industrial land use is comprised of mixed industrial land uses including support service commercial. Included within the mixed industrial land use category is the provision for incubator uses. These incubator uses are small, star-up industrial businesses, contained within an enclave of multi-tenant facilities ranging in individual size from 2,000 to 10,000 sf. As per the Fontana Gateway Specific Plan, the Project site is designated as General Industrial (I-G). The I-G land use designation allows for manufacturing, warehousing, fabrication, assembly, processing, trucking, equipment, automobile and truck sales and services are allowed in this category (43). As previously stated, the proposed Project consists of 355,370 sf of warehouse use, which is consistent with the site’s General Plan land use and Zoning designation and intensity. The industrial use proposed by the Project are consistent with the City’s land use designation. Additionally, the Project’s construction and operational-source air pollutant emissions would not exceed the regional or localized significance thresholds. On the basis of the preceding discussion, the Project is determined to be consistent with the second criterion. On the basis of the preceding discussion, the Project is determined to be consistent with the second criterion. Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 60 AQMP CONSISTENCY CONCLUSION The Project would not result in or cause NAAQS or CAAQS violations. The proposed Project is consistent with the land use and growth intensities reflected in the adopted General Plan. Furthermore, the Project would not exceed any applicable regional or local thresholds. As such, the Project is therefore considered to be consistent with the AQMP and a less than significant impact is expected. 3.11 POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO SENSITIVE RECEPTORS The potential impact of Project-generated air pollutant emissions at sensitive receptors has also been considered. Results of the LST analysis indicate that the Project would not exceed the SCAQMD localized significance thresholds during construction. Therefore, sensitive receptors would not be exposed to substantial pollutant concentrations during Project construction. Additionally, the Project would not exceed the SCAQMD localized significance thresholds during operational activity. Further Project traffic would not create or result in a CO “hotspot.” Therefore, sensitive receptors would not be exposed to substantial pollutant concentrations as the result of Project operations. 3.11.1 FRIANT RANCH CASE In December 2018, in the case of Sierra Club v. County of Fresno (2018) 6 Cal.5th 502, the California Supreme Court held that an Environmental Impact Report’s (EIR) air quality analysis must meaningfully connect the identified air quality impacts to the human health consequences of those impacts, or meaningfully explain why that analysis cannot be provided. As discussed in briefs filed in the Friant Ranch case, correlating a project’s criteria air pollutant emissions to specific health impacts is challenging. Health effects caused by criteria pollutant emissions are dependent on a variety of interrelated variables. In particular, ozone precursors (VOCs and NOX) affect air quality on a regional scale. The SCAQMD, which has among the most sophisticated air quality modeling and health impact evaluation capability of any of the air districts in the State, and thus it is uniquely situated to express an opinion on how lead agencies should correlate air quality impacts with specific health outcomes noted that it may be “difficult to quantify health impacts for criteria pollutants.” (44). As noted in the Brief, the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD) ties the difficulty of correlating the emission of criteria pollutants to health impacts to how ozone and particulate matter are formed, stating that “[b]ecause of the complexity of ozone formation, a specific tonnage amount of NOX or VOCs emitted in a particular area does not equate to a particular concentration of ozone in that area.” (45). Similarly, the tonnage of PM “emitted does not always equate to the local PM concentration because it can be transported long distances by wind,” and “[s]econdary PM, like ozone, is formed via complex chemical reactions in the atmosphere between precursor chemicals such as sulfur dioxides (SOX) and NOX,” meaning that “the tonnage of PM-forming precursor emissions in an area does not necessarily result in an equivalent concentration of secondary PM in that area.” (45). The disconnect between the amount of precursor pollutants and the concentration of ozone or PM formed makes it difficult Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 61 to determine potential health impacts, which are related to the concentration of ozone and PM experienced by the receptor rather than levels of NOX, SOX, and VOCs produced by a source. Health effects related to ozone are therefore the product of emissions generated by numerous sources throughout a region. SCAQMD’s Brief of Amicus Curiae (Brief, see Appendix 3.5) goes on to state that “it takes a large amount of additional precursor emissions (NOx and VOCs) to cause a modeled increase in ambient ozone levels over an entire region.” The SCAQMD states that based on their own modeling in the SCAQMD’s 2012 AQMP, a reduction of “NOX by 432 tons per day (157,680 tons/year) and reducing VOC by 187 tons per day (68,255 tons/year) would reduce ozone levels at the SCAQMD’s monitor site with the highest levels by only 9 parts per billion.”. As such, the SCAQMD concludes that it is not currently possible “to accurately quantify ozone- related health impacts caused by NOX or VOC emissions from relatively small projects.” (46). Most local agencies, including the City of Fontana, lack the data to do their own assessment of potential health impacts from criteria air pollutant emissions, as would be required to establish customized, locally-specific thresholds of significance based on potential health impacts from an individual development project. The use of national or “generic” data to fill the gap of missing local data would not yield accurate results because such data does not capture local air patterns, local background conditions, or local population characteristics, all of which play a role in how a population experiences air pollution. Because it is impracticable to accurately isolate the exact cause of a human disease (for example, the role a particular air pollutant plays compared to the role of other allergens and genetics in cause asthma), existing scientific tools cannot accurately estimate health impacts of the Project’s air emissions without undue speculation. Instead, readers are directed to the Project’s air quality impact analysis above, which provides extensive information concerning the quantifiable and non-quantifiable health risks related to the Project’s construction and long-term operation. Notwithstanding, this AQIA does evaluate the proposed Project’s localized impact to air quality for emissions of CO, NOX, PM10, and PM2.5 by comparing the proposed project’s on-site emissions to the SCAQMD’s applicable LST thresholds. The LST analysis above determined that the Project would not result in emissions exceeding SCAQMD’s LSTs. Therefore, the proposed Project would not be expected to exceed the most stringent applicable federal or state ambient air quality standards for emissions of CO, NOX, PM10, and PM2.5. As the Project’s emissions would comply with federal, state, and local air quality standards, the proposed Project’s emissions are not sufficiently high enough to use a regional modeling program to correlate health effects on a basin-wide level and would not provide a reliable indicator of health effects if modeled. 3.12 ODORS The potential for the Project to generate objectionable odors has also been considered. Land uses generally associated with odor complaints include: • Agricultural uses (livestock and farming) • Wastewater treatment plants Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 62 • Food processing plants • Chemical plants • Composting operations • Refineries • Landfills • Dairies • Fiberglass molding facilities The Project does not contain land uses typically associated with emitting objectionable odors. Potential odor sources associated with the proposed Project may result from construction equipment exhaust and the application of asphalt and architectural coatings during construction activities and the temporary storage of typical solid waste (refuse) associated with the proposed Project’s (long-term operational) uses. Standard construction requirements would minimize odor impacts from construction. The construction odor emissions would be temporary, short- term, and intermittent in nature and would cease upon completion of the respective phase of construction and is thus considered less than significant. It is expected that Project-generated refuse would be stored in covered containers and removed at regular intervals in compliance with the solid waste regulations. The proposed Project would also be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 402 to prevent occurrences of public nuisances. Therefore, odors associated with the proposed Project construction and operations would be less than significant and no mitigation is required (47). 3.13 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS As previously shown in Table 2-3, the CAAQS designate the Project site as nonattainment for O3 PM10, and PM2.5 while the NAAQS designates the Project site as nonattainment for O3 and PM2.5. The SCAQMD has published a report on how to address cumulative impacts from air pollution: White Paper on Potential Control Strategies to Address Cumulative Impacts from Air Pollution (48). In this report the SCAQMD clearly states (Page D-3): “…the SCAQMD uses the same significance thresholds for project specific and cumulative impacts for all environmental topics analyzed in an Environmental Assessment or EIR. The only case where the significance thresholds for project specific and cumulative impacts differ is the Hazard Index (HI) significance threshold for TAC emissions. The project specific (project increment) significance threshold is HI > 1.0 while the cumulative (facility-wide) is HI > 3.0. It should be noted that the HI is only one of three TAC emission significance thresholds considered (when applicable) in a CEQA analysis. The other two are the maximum individual cancer risk (MICR) and the cancer burden, both of which use the same significance thresholds (MICR of 10 in 1 million and cancer burden of 0.5) for project specific and cumulative impacts. Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 63 Projects that exceed the project-specific significance thresholds are considered by the SCAQMD to be cumulatively considerable. This is the reason project-specific and cumulative significance thresholds are the same. Conversely, projects that do not exceed the project-specific thresholds are generally not considered to be cumulatively significant.” Therefore, this analysis assumes that individual projects that do not generate operational or construction emissions that exceed the SCAQMD’s recommended daily thresholds for project- specific impacts would also not cause a cumulatively considerable increase in emissions for those pollutants for which SCAB is in nonattainment, and, therefore, would not be considered to have a significant, adverse air quality impact. Alternatively, individual project-related construction and operational emissions that exceed SCAQMD thresholds for project-specific impacts would be considered cumulatively considerable. CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS The Project‐specific evaluation of emissions presented in the preceding analysis demonstrates that Project construction-source air pollutant emissions would not result in exceedances of regional thresholds. Therefore, Project construction-source emissions would be considered less than significant on a project-specific and cumulative basis. OPERATIONAL IMPACTS The Project‐specific evaluation of emissions presented in the preceding analysis demonstrates that Project operational-source air pollutant emissions would not result in exceedances of regional thresholds. Therefore, Project operational-source emissions would be considered less than significant on a project-specific and cumulative basis. Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 64 This page intentionally left blank Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 65 4 REFERENCES 1. State of California. 2020 CEQA California Environmental Quality Act. 2020. 2. South Coast Air Quality Management District. RULE 403. FUGITIVE DUST. [Online] https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/rule-iv/rule-403.pdf?sfvrsn=4. 3. —. RULE 1113. Architectural Coatings. [Online] http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule- book/reg-xi/r1113.pdf. 4. Urban Crossroads, Inc. Fontana Corporate Center Traffic Study. October 2021. 5. South Coast Air Quality Management District. Southern California Air Basins. [Online] https://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/onroad/porttruck/maps/scabc7map.pdf. 6. —. Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning. 2005. 7. St. Croix Sensory, Inc. The "Gray Line" Between Odor Nuisance and Health Effects. 2000. 8. California Air Resources Board. Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS). [Online] 2016. http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/aaqs2.pdf. 9. United State Environmental Protection Agency. Frequent Questions about General Conformity . EPA. [Online] https://www.epa.gov/general-conformity/frequent-questions-about-general-conformity#8. 10. South Coast Air Quality Management District. Annual Air Quality Monitoring Network Plan. [Online] July 2018. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/clean-air-plans/air-quality-monitoring- network-plan/annual-air-quality-monitoring-network-plan-v2.pdf?sfvrsn=2. 11. Air Resources Board. State and National Ambient Air Quality Standards. [Online] https://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/2019/stateareadesignations/appc.pdf?_ga=2.169398369.15376157 02.1554741141-1192937971.1505156621. 12. District, South Coast Air Quality Management. Air Quality Data Tables. [Online] https://www.aqmd.gov/home/air-quality/air-quality-data-studies/historical-data-by-year. 13. Environmental Protection Agency. National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). [Online] 1990. https://www.epa.gov/environmental-topics/air-topics. 14. —. Air Pollution and the Clean Air Act. [Online] http://www.epa.gov/air/caa/. 15. United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1990 Clean Air Act Amendment Summary: Title I. [Online] https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/1990-clean-air-act-amendment-summary- title-i. 16. —. 1990 Clean Air Act Amendment Summary: Title II. [Online] https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act- overview/1990-clean-air-act-amendment-summary-title-ii. 17. Air Resources Board. California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS). [Online] 2009. [Cited: April 16, 2018.] http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/caaqs/caaqs.htm. 18. Southern California Association of Governments. 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. [Online] April 2016. http://scagrtpscs.net/Documents/2016/final/f2016RTPSCS.pdf. 19. South Coast Air Quality Management District. Air Quality Management Plan. 2012. 20. California Air Resources Board. The California Almanac of Emissions and Air Quality. 2013. 21. South Coast AQMD. South Coast Air Basin Ozone Trend. [Online] https://www.aqmd.gov/home/air- quality/historical-air-quality-data/historic-ozone-air-quality-trends. Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 66 22. California Air Resources Board. iADAM: Air Quality Data Statistics. California Air Resources Board. [Online] https://arb.ca.gov/adam/topfour/topfour1.php. 23. Environmental Protection Agency. Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California; South Coast Serious Area Plan for the 2006 PM2.5. [Online] 2019. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/02/12/2019-01922/approval-and-promulgation- of-implementation-plans-california-south-coast-serious-area-plan-for-the. 24. South Coast Air Quality Management District. Final 2016 Air Quality Management Plan. South Coast Air Quality Management District. [Online] March 2017. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/clean-air-plans/air-quality-management-plans/2016-air-quality-management-plan/final- 2016-aqmp/final2016aqmp.pdf. 25. South coast Air Quality Management District. CEQA Air Quality Handbook (1993). 1993. 26. California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board. Nitrogen Dioxide- Overview. [Online] http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/caaqs/no2-1/no2-1.htm. 27. Ralph Propper, Patrick Wong, Son Bui, Jeff Austin, William Vance, Alvaro Alvarado, Bart Croes, and Dongmin Luo. Ambient and Emission Trends of Toxic Air Contaminants in California. American Chemical Society: Environmental Science & Technology. 2015. 28. Air Resources Board. ARB's Drayage Truck Regulatory Activities. [Online] http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/onroad/porttruck/porttruck.htm. 29. —. Truck and Bus Regulation. On-Road Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicles (In-Use) Regulation. [Online] http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/onrdiesel/onrdiesel.htm. 30. The Port of Los Angeles. Clean Truck Program. [Online] http://www.portoflosangeles.org/ctp/idx_ctp.asp. 31. South Coast Air Quality Management District. Transfer Funds, Appropriate Funding, Execute Purchase Orders, Execute Contrat and Authorize Release of RFQs for the Fifth Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study. South Coast Air Quality Management District. [Online] 2017. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/Agendas/Governing-Board/2017/2017-jul7- 009.pdf?sfvrsn=7. 32. —. Executive Summary. MATES V Draft Report. [Online] 2021. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/planning/mates-v/draft-mates-v-executive-summary_v2.pdf?sfvrsn=6. 33. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds. [Online] http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air- quality-significance-thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2. 34. California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod). [Online] www.caleemod.com. 35. Lake Environmental. US EPA Models. Lake Environmental. [Online] http://www.weblakes.com/download/us_epa.html. 36. South Coast Air Quality Management District. Fact Sheet for Applying CalEEMod to Localized Significance Thresholds. [Online] http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/ceqa/handbook/localized-significance-thresholds/caleemod-guidance.pdf. 37. California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMod. CalEEMod. [Online] October 2017. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6. Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 67 38. South Coast Air Quality Management District. Localized Significance Thresholds Methodology. s.l. : South Coast Air Quality Managment District, 2008. 39. —. 2003 Air Quality Management Plan. [Online] 2003. https://www.aqmd.gov/home/air- quality/clean-air-plans/air-quality-mgt-plan/2003-aqmp. 40. Bay Area Air Quality Management District. [Online] http://www.baaqmd.gov/. 41. South Coast Air Quality Management District. Final 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). [Online] March 2017. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/clean-air-plans/air-quality- management-plans/2016-air-quality-management-plan/final-2016- aqmp/final2016aqmp.pdf?sfvrsn=11. 42. South coast Air Quality Management District. CEQA Air Quality Handbook (1993). 1993. 43. City of Fontana. Fontana Forward General Plan Update 2015-2035. 2017. 44. South Coast Air Quality Management District. Sierra Club, Revive the San Joaquin and League of Women Voters of Fresno, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. County of Fresno, Defendant and Respondent and, Friant Ranchm L.P. Real Party in Interest and Respondent. [Online] 2015. https://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/9-s219783-ac-south-coast-air-quality-mgt-dist-041315.pdf. 45. San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District. Application for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brieft of San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollutant Control District in Support of Defendent and Respondent, County of Fresno and Real Party in Interest and Respondent, Friant Ranch, L.P. [Online] 2015. https://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/7-s219783-ac-san-joaquin-valley-unified-air-pollution- control-dist-041315.pdf. 46. South Coast Air Quality Management District. Final 2012 Air Quality Management Plan. 2015. 47. —. RULE 402 NUISANCE. [Online] http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/rule-iv/rule- 402.pdf. 48. Goss, Tracy A and Kroeger, Amy. White Paper on Potential Control Strategies to Address Cumulative Impacts from Air Pollution. [Online] South Coast Air Quality Management District, 2003. http://www.aqmd.gov/rules/ciwg/final_white_paper.pdf. Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 68 This page intentionally left blank Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 69 5 CERTIFICATIONS The contents of this air study report represent an accurate depiction of the environmental impacts associated with the proposed Fontana Corporate Center. The information contained in this air quality impact assessment report is based on the best available data at the time of preparation. If you have any questions, please contact me directly at hqureshi@urbanxroads.com Haseeb Qureshi Associate Principal URBAN CROSSROADS, INC. hqureshi@urbanxroads.com EDUCATION Master of Science in Environmental Studies California State University, Fullerton • May 2010 Bachelor of Arts in Environmental Analysis and Design University of California, Irvine • June, 2006 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS AEP – Association of Environmental Planners AWMA – Air and Waste Management Association ASTM – American Society for Testing and Materials PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS Planned Communities and Urban Infill – Urban Land Institute • June 2011 Indoor Air Quality and Industrial Hygiene – EMSL Analytical • April 2008 Principles of Ambient Air Monitoring – CARB • August 2007 AB2588 Regulatory Standards – Trinity Consultants • November 2006 Air Dispersion Modeling – Lakes Environmental • June 2006 Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report 70 This page intentionally left blank Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report APPENDIX 2.1: STATE/FEDERAL ATTAINMENT STATUS OF CRITERIA POLLUTANTS APPENDIX C MAPS AND TABLES OF AREA DESIGNATIONS FOR STATE AND NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS APPENDIX C MAPS AND TABLES OF AREA DESIGNATIONS FOR STATE AND NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS This attachment fulfills the requirement of Health and Safety Code section 40718 for CARB to publish maps that identify areas where one or more violations of any State ambient air quality standard (State standard) or national ambient air quality standard (national standard) have been measured. The national standards are those promulgated under section 109 of the federal Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7409). This attachment is divided into three parts. The first part comprises a table showing the levels, averaging times, and measurement methods for each of the State and national standards. This is followed by a section containing maps and tables showing the area designations for each pollutant for which there is a State standard in the California Code of Regulations, title 17, section 70200. The last section contains maps and tables showing the most current area designations for the national standards. C-1 Ambient Air Quality Standards (Updated 5/4/16) Pollutant Averaging Time California Standards 1 National Standards 2 Concentration 3 Method 4 Primary 3,5 Secondary 3,6 Method 7 Ozone (O3)8 1 Hour 0.09 ppm (180 µg/m3) Ultraviolet Photometry — Same as Primary Standard Ultraviolet Photometry 8 Hour 0.070 ppm (137 µg/m3) 0.070 ppm (137 µg/m3) Respirable Particulate Matter (PM10)9 24 Hour 50 µg/m3 Gravimetric or Beta Attenuation 150 µg/m3 Same as Primary Standard Inertial Separation and Gravimetric Analysis Annual Arithmetic Mean 20 µg/m3 — Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5)9 24 Hour — — 35 µg/m3 Same as Primary Standard Inertial Separation and Gravimetric Analysis Annual Arithmetic Mean 12 µg/m3 Gravimetric or Beta Attenuation 12.0 µg/m3 15 µg/m3 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 1 Hour 20 ppm (23 mg/m3) Non-Dispersive Infrared Photometry (NDIR) 35 ppm (40 mg/m3) — Non-Dispersive Infrared Photometry (NDIR) 8 Hour 9.0 ppm (10 mg/m3) 9 ppm (10 mg/m3) — 8 Hour (Lake Tahoe) 6 ppm (7 mg/m3) — — Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2 )10 1 Hour 0.18 ppm (339 µg/m3) Gas Phase Chemiluminescence 100 ppb (188 μg/m3) — Gas Phase Chemiluminescence Annual Arithmetic Mean 0.030 ppm (57 µg/m3) 0.053 ppm (100 µg/m3) Same as Primary Standard Sulfur Dioxide (SO2 )11 1 Hour 0.25 ppm (655 µg/m3) Ultraviolet Fluorescence 75 ppb (196 μg/m3) — Ultraviolet Flourescence; Spectrophotometry (Pararosaniline Method) 3 Hour — — 0.5 ppm (1300 µg/m3) 24 Hour 0.04 ppm (105 µg/m3) 0.14 ppm (for certain areas)11 — Annual Arithmetic Mean — 0.030 ppm (for certain areas)11 — Lead12 , 13 30 Day Average 1.5 µg/m3 Atomic Absorption — — High Volume Sampler and Atomic Absorption Calendar Quarter — 1.5 µg/m3 (for certain areas)12 Same as Primary Standard Rolling 3-Month Average — 0.15 µg/m3 Visibility Reducing Particles14 8 Hour See footnote 14 Beta Attenuation and Transmittance through Filter Tape No National Standards Sulfates 24 Hour 25 µg/m3 Ion Chromatography Hydrogen Sulfide 1 Hour 0.03 ppm (42 µg/m3) Ultraviolet Fluorescence Vinyl Chloride12 24 Hour 0.01 ppm (26 µg/m3) Gas Chromatography See footnotes on next page … C-2 1. California standards for ozone, carbon monoxide (except 8-hour Lake Tahoe), sulfur dioxide (1- and 24-hour), nitrogen dioxide, and particulate matter (PM10, PM2.5, and visibility reducing particles), are values that are not to be exceeded. All others are not to be equaled or exceeded. California ambient air quality standards are listed in the Table of Standards in Section 70200 of Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations. 2. National standards (other than ozone, particulate matter, and those based on annual arithmetic mean) are not to be exceeded more than once a year. The ozone standard is attained when the fourth highest 8-hour concentration measured at each site in a year, averaged over three years, is equal to or less than the standard. For PM10, the 24-hour standard is attained when the expected number of days per calendar year with a 24-hour average concentration above 150 μg/m3 is equal to or less than one. For PM2.5, the 24-hour standard is attained when 98 percent of the daily concentrations, averaged over three years, are equal to or less than the standard. Contact the U.S. EPA for further clarification and current national policies. 3. Concentration expressed first in units in which it was promulgated. Equivalent units given in parentheses are based upon a reference temperature of 25°C and a reference pressure of 760 torr. Most measurements of air quality are to be corrected to a reference temperature of 25°C and a reference pressure of 760 torr; ppm in this table refers to ppm by volume, or micromoles of pollutant per mole of gas. 4. Any equivalent measurement method which can be shown to the satisfaction of the CARB to give equivalent results at or near the level of the air quality standard may be used. 5. National Primary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary, with an adequate margin of safety to protect the public health. 6. National Secondary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary to protect the public welfare from any known or anticipated adverse effects of a pollutant. 7. Reference method as described by the U.S. EPA. An “equivalent method” of measurement may be used but must have a “consistent relationship to the reference method” and must be approved by the U.S. EPA. 8. On October 1, 2015, the national 8-hour ozone primary and secondary standards were lowered from 0.075 to 0.070 ppm. 9. On December 14, 2012, the national annual PM2.5 primary standard was lowered from 15 μg/m3 to 12.0 μg/m3. The existing national 24-hour PM2.5 standards (primary and secondary) were retained at 35 μg/m3, as was the annual secondary standard of 15 μg/m3. The existing 24-hour PM10 standards (primary and secondary) of 150 μg/m3 also were retained. The form of the annual primary and secondary standards is the annual mean, averaged over 3 years. 10. To attain the 1-hour national standard, the 3-year average of the annual 98th percentile of the 1-hour daily maximum concentrations at each site must not exceed 100 ppb. Note that the national 1-hour standard is in units of parts per billion (ppb). California standards are in units of parts per million (ppm). To directly compare the national 1-hour standard to the California standards the units can be converted from ppb to ppm. In this case, the national standard of 100 ppb is identical to 0.100 ppm. 11. On June 2, 2010, a new 1-hour SO2 standard was established and the existing 24-hour and annual primary standards were revoked. To attain the 1-hour national standard, the 3-year average of the annual 99th percentile of the 1-hour daily maximum concentrations at each site must not exceed 75 ppb. The 1971 SO2 national standards (24-hour and annual) remain in effect until one year after an area is designated for the 2010 standard, except that in areas designated nonattainment for the 1971 standards, the 1971 standards remain in effect until implementation plans to attain or maintain the 2010 standards are approved. Note that the 1-hour national standard is in units of parts per billion (ppb). California standards are in units of parts per million (ppm). To directly compare the 1-hour national standard to the California standard the units can be converted to ppm. In this case, the national standard of 75 ppb is identical to 0.075 ppm. 12. The CARB has identified lead and vinyl chloride as 'toxic air contaminants' with no threshold level of exposure for adverse health effects determined. These actions allow for the implementation of control measures at levels below the ambient concentrations specified for these pollutants. 13. The national standard for lead was revised on October 15, 2008 to a rolling 3-month average. The 1978 lead standard (1.5 μg/m3)as a quarterly average) remains in effect until one year after an area is designated for the 2008 standard, except that in areas designated nonattainment for the 1978 standard, the 1978 standard remains in effect until implementation plans to attain or maintain the 2008 standard are approved. 14. In 1989, the CARB converted both the general statewide 10-mile visibility standard and the Lake Tahoe 30-mile visibility standard to instrumental equivalents, which are "extinction of 0.23 per kilometer" and "extinction of 0.07 per kilometer" for the statewide and Lake Tahoe Air Basin standards, respectively. C-3 Area Designations for the State Ambient Air Quality Standards The following maps and tables show the area designations for each pollutant with a State standard set forth in the California Code of Regulations, title 17, section 60200. Each area is identified as attainment, nonattainment, nonattainment-transitional, or unclassified for each pollutant, as shown below: Attainment A Nonattainment N Nonattainment-Transitional NA-T Unclassified U In general, CARB designates areas by air basin for pollutants with a regional impact and by county for pollutants with a more local impact. However, when there are areas within an air basin or county with distinctly different air quality deriving from sources and conditions not affecting the entire air basin or county, CARB may designate a smaller area. Generally, when boundaries of the designated area differ from the air basin or county boundaries, the description of the specific area is referenced at the bottom of the summary table. C-4 FIGURE 1 2020 Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Standards OZONE C-5 NORTH CENTRAL COAST ~ Unclassified !"(t:\i) Attainment [I]II] Nonattainment-Transitional ~ Nonattainment -Air Basin --County Last Updated: October 2020 Air Quality Planning and Science Division, CARB 2020 Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Standards OZONE N A 200 ----====----c::===Miles 50 100 150 SOUTH COAST---...-: ~ " SAN DIEGO TABLE 1 California Ambient Air Quality Standards Area Designations for Ozone 1 N NA-T U A GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN Alpine County X Inyo County X Mono County X LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X MOJAVE DESERT AIR BASIN X MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN Amador County X Calaveras County X El Dorado County (portion) X Mariposa County X Nevada County X Placer County (portion) X Plumas County X Sierra County X Tuolumne County X NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X NORTH COAST AIR BASIN X N NA-T U A NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN X SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN Colusa and Glenn Counties X Shasta County X Sutter/Yuba Counties Sutter Buttes X Remainder of Sutter County X Yuba County X Yolo/Solano Counties X Remainder of Air Basin X SALTON SEA AIR BASIN X SAN DIEGO AIR BASIN X SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN X SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN X SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN San Luis Obispo County X Santa Barbara County X Ventura County X SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN X 1 AB 3048 (Olberg) and AB 2525 (Miller) signed into law in 1996, made changes to Health and Safety Code, section 40925.5. One of the changes allows nonattainment districts to become nonattainment-transitional for ozone by operation of law. C-6 FIGURE 2 2020 Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Standards PM10 C-7 NORTH CENTRAL COAST ~ Unclassified f'/i/\j Attainment ~ Nonattainment -Air Basin -- County Last Updated: October 2020 Modoc Air Quality Planning and Science Division, CARB 2020 Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Standards PM10 N A 200 ----====----c::===Miles 50 100 150 SOUTH COAST------;: ' " SAN DIEGO TABLE 2 California Ambient Air Quality Standards Area Designation for Suspended Particulate Matter (PM10) N U A GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN X LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X MOJAVE DESERT AIR BASIN X MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN Amador County X Calaveras County X El Dorado County (portion) X Mariposa County - Yosemite National Park X - Remainder of County X Nevada County X Placer County (portion) X Plumas County X Sierra County X Tuolumne County X N U A NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X NORTH COAST AIR BASIN Del Norte, Sonoma (portion) and Trinity Counties X Remainder of Air Basin X NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN Siskiyou County X Remainder of Air Basin X SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN Shasta County X Remainder of Air Basin X SALTON SEA AIR BASIN X SAN DIEGO AIR BASIN X SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN X SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN X SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN X C-8 FIGURE 3 2020 Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Standards PM2.5 C-9 NORTH CENTRAL COAST ~ Unclassified f'/i/\j Attainment ~ Nonattainment -Air Basin -- County Last Updated: October 2020 Air Quality Planning and Science Division, CARB 2020 Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Standards PM2.5 N A 200 ----====----===::::iMiles 50 100 150 GREAT '=~--BASIN VALLEYS )Q.:xJ~-'?---~c-:>\. SOUTH COAST------;: 'JOC>O<><X"l: ' " SAN DIEGO Calexico TABLE 3 California Ambient Air Quality Standards Area Designations for Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) N U A GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN X LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X MOJAVE DESERT AIR BASIN San Bernardino County - County portion of federal Southeast Desert Modified AQMA for Ozone1 X Remainder of Air Basin X MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN Plumas County - Portola Valley2 X Remainder of Air Basin X NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X NORTH COAST AIR BASIN X NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN X SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN Butte County X Colusa County X Glenn County X Placer County (portion) X Sacramento County X Shasta County X Sutter and Yuba Counties X Remainder of Air Basin X N U A SALTON SEA AIR BASIN Imperial County - City of Calexico3 X Remainder of Air Basin X SAN DIEGO AIR BASIN X SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN X SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN X SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN San Luis Obispo County X Santa Barbara County X Ventura County X SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN X 1 California Code of Regulations, title 17, section 60200(b) 2 California Code of Regulations, title 17, section 60200(c) 3 California Code of Regulations, title 17, section 60200(a) C-10 FIGURE 4 2020 Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Standards CARBON MONOXIDE C-11 Siskiyou NORTHEAST Modoc PLATEAU NORTH CENTRAL COAST CJ Unclassified !\J,)::J Attainment -Air Basin --County Last Updated: October 2020 Air Quality Planning and Science Division, CARB 2020 Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Standards CARBON MONOXIDE N A 200 ----====----c::===Miles 50 100 150 GREAT ="'----BASIN VALLEYS ,':·.·.;~---- SOUTH COAST--....,-,~ ~ ~~~--i•et".'.';._L,.: " SAN DIEGO TABLE 4 California Ambient Air Quality Standards Area Designation for Carbon Monoxide* N NA-T U A GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN Alpine County X Inyo County X Mono County X LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X MOJAVE DESERT AIR BASIN Kern County (portion) X Los Angeles County (portion) X Riverside County (portion) X San Bernardino County (portion) X MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN Amador County X Calaveras County X El Dorado County (portion) X Mariposa County X Nevada County X Placer County (portion) X Plumas County X Sierra County X Tuolumne County X NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN Monterey County X San Benito County X Santa Cruz County X NORTH COAST AIR BASIN Del Norte County X Humboldt County X Mendocino County X Sonoma County (portion) X Trinity County X NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN X N NA-T U A SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN Butte County X Colusa County X Glenn County X Placer County (portion) X Sacramento County X Shasta County X Solano County (portion) X Sutter County X Tehama County X Yolo County X Yuba County X SALTON SEA AIR BASIN X SAN DIEGO AIR BASIN X SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN X SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN Fresno County X Kern County (portion) X Kings County X Madera County X Merced County X San Joaquin County X Stanislaus County X Tulare County X SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN X * The area designated for carbon monoxide is a county or portion of a county C-12 FIGURE 5 2020 Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Standards NITROGEN DIOXIDE C-13 NORTH CENTRAL COAST ['/·.,\J Attainment ~ Nonattainment -Air Basin -- County Last Updated: October 2020 Air Quality Planning and Science Division, CARB 2020 Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Standards NITROGEN DIOXIDE N A 50 100 150 •o~-•• CA 60 (Portion) SOUTH COAST--~ ~ ~~~..........- 200 Miles " SAN DIEGO -~2.J]itJ~9~-- Calexico TABLE 5 California Ambient Air Quality Standards Area Designations for Nitrogen Dioxide N U A GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN X LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X MOJAVE DESERT AIR BASIN X MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN X NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X NORTH COAST AIR BASIN X NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN X N U A SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN X SALTON SEA AIR BASIN X SAN DIEGO AIR BASIN X SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN X SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN X SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN CA 60 Near-road Portion of San Bernardino, Riverside, and Los Angeles Counties X Remainder of Air Basin X C-14 FIGURE 6 2020 Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Standards SULFUR DIOXIDE C-15 NORTH CENTRAL COAST F"/'{I Attainment -Air Basin --County Last Updated: October 2020 Air Quality Planning and Science Division, CARB 2020 Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Standards SULFUR DIOXIDE N A 200 ----====----===::::iMiles 50 100 150 SOUTH COAST--~~· ~ " SAN DIEGO -~@jJiJJl~~------- TABLE 6 California Ambient Air Quality Standards Area Designation for Sulfur Dioxide* N A GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN X LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X MOJAVE DESERT AIR BASIN X MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN X NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X NORTH COAST AIR BASIN X NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN X N A SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN X SALTON SEA AIR BASIN X SAN DIEGO AIR BASIN X SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN X SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN X SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN X * The area designated for sulfur dioxide is a county or portion of a county. Since all areas in the State are in attainment for this standard, air basins are indicated here for simplicity. C-16 FIGURE 7 2020 Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Standards SULFATES C-17 NORTH CENTRAL COAST !\J,)::J Attainment -Air Basin --County Last Updated: October 2020 Air Quality Planning and Science Division, CARB 2020 Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Standards SULFATES N A 200 ----====----c::===Miles 50 100 150 GREAT ="'----BASIN VALLEYS --~--, SOUTH COAST---...,-,~ ~ ~~~--i•et".'.';._L,.: " SAN DIEGO TABLE 7 California Ambient Air Quality Standards Area Designation for Sulfates N U A GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN X LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X MOJAVE DESERT AIR BASIN X MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN X NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X NORTH COAST AIR BASIN X NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN X N U A SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN X SALTON SEA AIR BASIN X SAN DIEGO AIR BASIN X SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN X SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN X SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN X C-18 FIGURE 8 2020 Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Standards LEAD C-19 NORTH CENTRAL COAST !\J,)::J Attainment -Air Basin --County Last Updated: October 2020 Air Quality Planning and Science Division, CARB 2020 Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Standards LEAD N A 200 ----====----c::===Miles 50 100 150 GREAT ="'----BASIN VALLEYS ·-....,..--, SOUTH COAST ---...,-,c ~ '✓-"~~~".'.';._L,.: " SAN DIEGO TABLE 8 California Ambient Air Quality Standards Area Designations for Lead (particulate)* N U A GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN X LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X MOJAVE DESERT AIR BASIN X MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN X NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X NORTH COAST AIR BASIN X NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN X SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN X N U A SALTON SEA AIR BASIN X SAN DIEGO AIR BASIN X SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN X SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN X SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN X * The area designated for lead is a county or portion of a county. Since all areas in the State are in attainment for this standard, air basins are indicated here for simplicity. C-20 FIGURE 9 2020 Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Standards HYDROGEN SULFIDE C-21 Siskiyou NORTHEAST Modoc PLATEAU NORTH CENTRAL COAST ~ Unclassified t:'/:\ \J Attainment ~ Nonattainment -Air Basin -- County Last Updated: October 2020 Air Quality Planning and Science Division, CARB 2020 Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Standards HYDROGEN SULFIDE N A 200 ----====----c::===Miles 50 100 150 San Bernardino SOUTH COAST--~~ ~ 'v'"-----:. " SAN DIEGO -J\:;.... _ _.11..---- TABLE 9 California Ambient Air Quality Standards Area Designation for Hydrogen Sulfide* N NA-T U A GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN Alpine County X Inyo County X Mono County X LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X MOJAVE DESERT AIR BASIN Kern County (portion) X Los Angeles County (portion) X Riverside County (portion) X San Bernardino County (portion) - Searles Valley Planning Area1 X - Remainder of County X MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN Amador County - City of Sutter Creek X - Remainder of County X Calaveras County X El Dorado County (portion) X Mariposa County X Nevada County X Placer County (portion) X Plumas County X Sierra County X Tuolumne County X N NA-T U A NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X NORTH COAST AIR BASIN Del Norte County X Humboldt County X Mendocino County X Sonoma County (portion) - Geyser Geothermal Area2 X - Remainder of County X Trinity County X NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN X SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN X SALTON SEA AIR BASIN X SAN DIEGO AIR BASIN X SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN X SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN X SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN San Luis Obispo County X Santa Barbara County X Ventura County X SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN X * The area designated for hydrogen sulfide is a county or portion of a county 1 52 Federal Register 29384 (August 7, 1987) 2 California Code of Regulations, title 17, section 60200(d) C-22 FIGURE 10 2020 Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Standards VISIBILITY REDUCING PARTICLES C-23 Siskiyou NORTHEAST Modoc PLATEAU NORTH CENTRAL COAST CJ Unclassified !\J,)::J Attainment -Air Basin -- County Last Updated: October 2020 Air Quality Planning and Science Division, CARB 2020 Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Standards VISIBILITY REDUCING PARTICLES N A 200 ----====----c::===Miles 50 100 150 GREAT --'..,_--BASIN VALLEYS ---~, SOUTH COAST--~~ San Bernardino ~ 'v'"------ " SAN DIEGO -J\:;.... _ _.11..---- TABLE 10 California Ambient Air Quality Standards Area Designation for Visibility Reducing Particles N NA-T U A GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN X LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X MOJAVE DESERT AIR BASIN X MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN X NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X NORTH COAST AIR BASIN X NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN X N NA-T U A SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN X SALTON SEA AIR BASIN X SAN DIEGO AIR BASIN X SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN X SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN X SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN X C-24 Area Designations for the National Ambient Air Quality Standards The following maps and tables show the area designations for each pollutant with a national ambient air quality standard. Additional information about the federal area designations is available on the U.S. EPA website: https://www.epa.gov/green-book Over the last several years, U.S. EPA has been reviewing the levels of the various national standards. The agency has already promulgated new standard levels for some pollutants and is considering revising the levels for others. Information about the status of these reviews is available on the U.S. EPA website: https://www.epa.gov/criteria-air-pollutants Designation Categories Suspended Particulate Matter (PM10). The U.S. EPA uses three categories to designate areas with respect to PM10: • Attainment (A) • Nonattainment (N) • Unclassifiable (U) Ozone, Fine Suspended Particulate Matter (PM2.5), Carbon Monoxide (CO), and Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2). The U.S. EPA uses two categories to designate areas with respect to these standards: • Nonattainment (N) • Unclassifiable/Attainment (U/A) The national 1-hour ozone standard was revoked effective June 15, 2005, and the area designations map reflects the 2015 national 8-hour ozone standard of 0.070 ppm. Area designations were finalized on August 3, 2018. On December 14, 2012, the U.S. EPA established a new national annual primary PM2.5 standard of 12.0 μg/m3. Area designations were finalized in December 2014. The current designation map reflects the most recently revised (2012) annual average standard of 12.0 μg/m3 as well as the 24-hour standard of 35 μg/m3, revised in 2006. On January 22, 2010, the U.S. EPA established a new national 1-hour NO2 standard of 100 parts per billion (ppb) and retained the annual average standard of 53 ppb. Designations for the primary NO2 standard became effective on February 29, 2012. All areas of California meet this standard. Sulfur Dioxide (SO2). The U.S. EPA uses three categories to designate areas with respect to the 24-hour and annual average sulfur dioxide standards. These designation categories are: • Nonattainment (N), • Unclassifiable (U), and • Unclassifiable/Attainment (U/A). On June 2, 2010, the U.S. EPA established a new primary 1-hour SO2 standard of 75 parts per billion (ppb). At the same time, U.S. EPA revoked the 24-hour and annual C-25 average standards. Area designations for the 1-hour SO2 standard were finalized on December 21, 2017 and are reflected in the area designations map. Lead (particulate). The U.S. EPA promulgated a new rolling 3-month average lead standard in October 2008 of 0.15 μg/m3. Designations were made for this standard in November 2010. Designation Areas From time to time, the boundaries of the California air basins have been changed to facilitate the planning process. CARB generally initiates these changes, and they are not always reflected in the U.S. EPA’s area designations. For purposes of consistency, the maps in this attachment reflect area designation boundaries and nomenclature as promulgated by the U.S. EPA. In some cases, these may not be the same as those adopted by CARB. For example, the national area designations reflect the former Southeast Desert Air Basin. In accordance with Health and Safety Code section 39606.1, CARB redefined this area in 1996 to be the Mojave Desert Air Basin and Salton Sea Air Basin. The definitions and boundaries for all areas designated for the national standards can be found in Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Chapter I, Subchapter C, Part 81.305. They are available on the web at: https://ecfr.io/Title-40/se40.20.81_1305 C-26 FIGURE 11 Area Designations for National Ambient Air Quality Standards 8-HOUR OZONE C-27 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA Siskiyou NORTHEAST Modoc PLATEAU Area Designations for National Ambient Air Quality Standards 8-HOUR OZONE N A 200 ----c::====-----=====iMiles 50 100 150 GREAT -~--BASIN 'i~~~ttii;t~=------'' VALLEYS NORTH CENTRAL COAST c::J Unclassified/Attainment m Nonattainment -Air Basin --County Source Date: August 2019 Air Quality Planning and Science Division SAN DIEGO Antelope Valley and Western Mojave Desert TABLE 11 National Ambient Air Quality Standards Area Designations for 8-Hour Ozone* N U/A GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN X LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN Amador County X Calaveras County X El Dorado County (portion)1 X Mariposa County X Nevada County - Western Nevada County X - Remainder of County X Placer County (portion)1 X Plumas County X Sierra County X Tuolumne County X NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X NORTH COAST AIR BASIN X NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN X SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN Butte County X Colusa County X Glenn County X Sacramento Metro Area1 X Shasta County X Sutter County - Sutter Buttes X - Southern portion of Sutter County1 X - Remainder of Sutter County X Tehama County - Tuscan Buttes X - Remainder of Tehama County X N U/A SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN (cont.) Yolo County1 X Yuba County X SAN DIEGO COUNTY X SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN X SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN X SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN2 San Luis Obispo County - Eastern San Luis Obispo County X - Remainder of County X Santa Barbara County X Ventura County - Area excluding Anacapa and San Nicolas Islands X - Channel Islands2 X SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN2 X SOUTHEAST DESERT AIR BASIN Kern County (portion) X - Indian Wells Valley X Imperial County X Los Angeles County (portion) X Riverside County (portion) - Coachella Valley X - Non-AQMA portion X San Bernardino County - Western portion (AQMA) X - Eastern portion (non-AQMA) X * Definitions and references for all areas can be found in 40 CFR, Chapter I, Part 81.305. NOTE: This map and table reflect the 2015 8-hour ozone standard of 0.070 ppm. 1 For this purpose, the Sacramento Metro Area comprises all of Sacramento and Yolo Counties, the Sacramento Valley Air Basin portion of Solano County, the southern portion of Sutter County, and the Sacramento Valley and Mountain Counties Air Basins portions of Placer and El Dorado counties. 2 South Central Coast Air Basin Channel Islands: Santa Barbara County includes Santa Cruz, San Miguel, Santa Rosa, and Santa Barbara Islands. Ventura County includes Anacapa and San Nicolas Islands. South Coast Air Basin: Los Angeles County includes San Clemente and Santa Catalina Islands. C-28 FIGURE 12 Area Designations for National Ambient Air Quality Standards PM10 C-29 SAN FRAN BAY AREA San Franc San M CJ Unclassified 1:/\/il Attainment ~ Nonattainment -Air Basin -- County Source Date: October 2020 SOUTH CENTRAL COAST Air Quality Planning and Science Division Lassen Area Designations for National Ambient Air Quality Standards PM10 N A 0 50 100 150 200 Miles SOUTH COAST-~-• "bi ',;F"-....... ....... --.- \. SAN DIEGO COUNTY TABLE 12 National Ambient Air Quality Standards Area Designations for Suspended Particulate Matter (PM10)* N U A GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN Alpine County X Inyo County - Owens Valley Planning Area X - Coso Junction X - Remainder of County X Mono County - Mammoth Lake Planning Area X - Mono Lake Basin X - Remainder of County X LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN Placer County (portion)1 X Remainder of Air Basin X NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X NORTH COAST AIR BASIN X NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN X SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN Butte County X Colusa County X Glenn County X Placer County (portion)1 X Sacramento County2 X Shasta County X Solano County (portion) X Sutter County X Tehama County X Yolo County X Yuba County X N U A SAN DIEGO COUNTY X SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN X SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN X SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTHEAST DESERT AIR BASIN Eastern Kern County - Indian Wells Valley X - Portion within San Joaquin Valley Planning Area X - Remainder of County X Imperial County - Imperial Valley Planning Area3 X - Remainder of County X Los Angeles County (portion) X Riverside County (portion) - Coachella Valley4 X - Non-AQMA portion X San Bernardino County - Trona X - Remainder of County X * Definitions and references for all areas can be found in 40 CFR, Chapter I, Part 81.305. 1 U.S. EPA designation puts the Sacramento Valley Air Basin portion of Placer County in the Mountain Counties Air Basin. 2 Air quality in Sacramento County meets the national PM10 standards. The request for redesignation to attainment was approved by U.S. EPA in September 2013. 3 The request for redesignation to attainment for the Imperial Valley Planning Area was approved by U.S. EPA and in September 2020, effective October 2020. 4 Air quality in Coachella Valley meets the national PM10 standards. A request for redesignation to attainment has been submitted to U.S. EPA. C-30 FIGURE 13 Area Designations for National Ambient Air Quality Standards PM2.5 C-31 Siskiyou Modoc NORTHEAST PLATEAU NORTH COAST LAKE COUNTY SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA NORTH CENTRAL COAST SOUTH CENTRAL COAST ~ Unclassified/Attainment ~ Nonattainment -Air Basin --County Source Date: August 2019 Air Quality Planning and Science Division Area Designations for National Ambient Air Quality Standards PM2.5 0 MOUNTAIN COUNTIES 50 LAKE TAHOE N A 100 GREAT BASIN VALLEYS 150 San Bernardino 200 Miles SOUTHEAST DESERT SAN DIEGO COUNTY TABLE 13 National Ambient Air Quality Standards Area Designations for Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) N U/A GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN X LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN Plumas County - Portola Valley Portion of Plumas X - Remainder of Plumas County X Remainder of Air Basin X NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X NORTH COAST AIR BASIN X NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN X SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN Sacramento Metro Area1 X Sutter County X Yuba County (portion) X Remainder of Air Basin X N U/A SAN DIEGO COUNTY X SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN2 X SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN X SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN3 X SOUTHEAST DESERT AIR BASIN Imperial County (portion)4 X Remainder of Air Basin X * Definitions and references for all areas can be found in 40 CFR, Chapter I, Part 81.305. This map reflects the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard as well as the 1997 and 2012 PM2.5 annual standards. 1 For this purpose, Sacramento Metro Area comprises all of Sacramento and portions of El Dorado, Placer, Solano, and Yolo Counties. Air quality in this area meets the national PM2.5 standards. A Determination of Attainment for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard was made by U.S. EPA in June 2017. 2 Air quality in this area meets the national PM2.5 standards. A Determination of Attainment for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard was made by U.S. EPA in June 2017. 3 Those lands of the Santa Rosa Band of Cahulla Mission Indians in Riverside County are designated Unclassifiable/Attainment. 4 That portion of Imperial County encompassing the urban and surrounding areas of Brawley, Calexico, El Centro, Heber, Holtville, Imperial, Seeley, and Westmorland. Air quality in this area meets the national PM2.5 standards. A Determination of Attainment for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard was made by U.S. EPA in June 2017. C-32 FIGURE 14 Area Designations for National Ambient Air Quality Standards CARBON MONOXIDE C-33 SAN FRANCI BAY AREA Siskiyou NORTHEAST PLATEAU NORTH CENTRAL COAST SOUTH CENTRAL COAST ~ Unclassified/Attainment -Air Basin --County Source Date: August 2019 Air Quality Planning and Science Division Modoc Area Designations for National Ambient Air Quality Standards CARBON MONOXIDE N A a 50 100 150 200 Miles SOUTHEAST DESERT San Bernardino Imperial SAN DIEGO COUNTY TABLE 14 National Ambient Air Quality Standards Area Designations for Carbon Monoxide* N U/A GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN X LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN X NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X NORTH COAST AIR BASIN X NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN X N U/A SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN X SAN DIEGO COUNTY X SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN X SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN X SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTHEAST DESERT AIR BASIN X * Definitions and references for all areas can be found in 40 CFR, Chapter I, Part 81.305. C-34 FIGURE 15 Area Designations for National Ambient Air Quality Standards NITROGEN DIOXIDE C-35 SAN FRANCI BAY AREA Siskiyou NORTHEAST Modoc PLATEAU NORTH CENTRAL COAST ~ Unclassified/Attainment -AirBasin -- County Source Date: August 2019 Air Quality Planning and Science Division Area Designations for National Ambient Air Quality Standards NITROGEN DIOXIDE N A 0 50 100 150 200 Miles SOUTHEAST DESERT San Bernardino TABLE 15 National Ambient Air Quality Standards Area Designations for Nitrogen Dioxide* N U/A GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN X LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN X NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X NORTH COAST AIR BASIN X NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN X N U/A SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN X SAN DIEGO COUNTY X SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN X SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN X SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTHEAST DESERT AIR BASIN X * Definitions and references for all areas can be found in 40 CFR, Chapter I, Part 81.305. C-36 FIGURE 16 C-37 Area Designations for National Ambient Air Quality Standards SULFUR DIOXIDE SAN FRANCI BAY AREA Marin Siskiyou NORTH EAST Modoc PLATEAU NORTH CENTRAL COAST ~ Unclassified/Attainment -Air Basin --County Source Date: August 2019 Air Quality Planning and Science Division Area Designations for National Ambient Air Quality Standards SULFUR DIOXIDE N A 50 100 150 200 Miles SOUTHEAST DESERT San Bernardino TABLE 16 National Ambient Air Quality Standards Area Designations for Sulfur Dioxide* N U/A GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN X LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN X NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X NORTH COAST AIR BASIN X NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN X SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN X SAN DIEGO COUNTY X SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN X SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN Fresno County X Kern County (portion) X Kings County X Madera County X Merced County X San Joaquin County X Stanislaus County X Tulare County X N U/A SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN San Luis Obispo County X Santa Barbara County X Ventura County X Channel Islands1 X SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTHEAST DESERT AIR BASIN Imperial County X Remainder of Air Basin X * Definitions and references for all areas can be found in 40 CFR, Chapter I, Part 81.305. NOTE: This map and table reflect the 2010 1-hour SO2 standard of 75 ppb. 1 South Central Coast Air Basin Channel Islands: Santa Barbara County includes Santa Cruz, San Miguel, Santa Rosa, and Santa Barbara Islands. Ventura County includes Anacapa and San Nicolas Islands. Note that the San Clemente and Santa Catalina Islands are considered part of Los Angeles County, and therefore, are included as part of the South Coast Air Basin. C-38 FIGURE 17 Area Designations for National Ambient Air Quality Standards LEAD C-39 SAN FRANCI BAY AREA Siskiyou Modoc NORTHEAST PLATEAU NORTH CENTRAL COAST ~ Unclassified/Attainment ~ Nonattainment -Air Basin --County Source Date: August 2019 Air Quality Planning and Science Division Area Designations for National Ambient Air Quality Standards LEAD 0 50 GREAT ~~-BASIN VALLEYS ""----""- N A 100 150 SOUTHEAST DESERT San Bernardino 200 Miles TABLE 17 National Ambient Air Quality Standards Area Designations for Lead (particulate) N U/A GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN X LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN X NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X NORTH COAST AIR BASIN X NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN X SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN X N U/A SAN DIEGO COUNTY X SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN X SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN X SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN Los Angeles County (portion)1 X Remainder of Air Basin X SOUTHEAST DESERT AIR BASIN X 1 Portion of County in Air Basin, not including Channel Islands C-40 Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report This page intentionally left blank Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report APPENDIX 3.1: CALEEMOD PROJECT CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS (UNMITIGATED) Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer Project Characteristics - Land Use - Total Project Area is 18.53 acres Construction Phase - Construction anticipated to begin September 2022 and end in September 2023 Off-road Equipment - Crushing anticipated to occur during Demolition. As such, Crushing/Proc. Equipment has been added Off-road Equipment - Crawler Tractors used in lieu of Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Off-road Equipment - Crawler Tractors used in lieu of Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Off-road Equipment - Hours are based on an 8-hour workday Off-road Equipment - Hours based on an 8-hour workday Off-road Equipment - 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 355.37 1000sqft 8.16 355,370.00 0 Parking Lot 387.00 Space 2.00 87,341.00 0 City Park 1.96 Acre 1.96 85,590.00 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 279.07 1000sqft 6.41 279,068.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 10 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 32 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2023Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 390.98 0.033CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.004N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:55 PMPage 1 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I 1 I • • I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -;. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --=-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -• • I I I ■ • I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -;. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --=-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -• • I I I ■ • I I I ------------------------------1------------------------------~------------------------------wi---------------~-----------------~--------------- Grading - Analysis assumes that up 5 acres will be disturbed per day Demolition - Trips and VMT - Vendor Trips adjusted based on CalEEMod defaults for Building Construction and number of days for Demolition, Site Preparation, Grading, and Building Construction Architectural Coating - Rule 1113 Vehicle Trips - Construction run only Energy Use - Construction run only Water And Wastewater - Construction run only Solid Waste - Construction run only Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Rule 403 Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 100.00 50.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 40.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 220.00 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 3/13/2024 9/27/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 1/17/2024 9/27/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 2/14/2024 9/27/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 2/15/2024 8/3/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 1/18/2024 8/31/2023 tblEnergyUse LightingElect 0.35 0.00 tblEnergyUse LightingElect 1.17 0.00 tblEnergyUse NT24E 0.82 0.00 tblEnergyUse NT24NG 0.03 0.00 tblEnergyUse T24E 0.33 0.00 tblEnergyUse T24NG 1.98 0.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 120.00 150.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 35.00 50.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 154,800.00 87,341.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 85,377.60 85,590.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:55 PMPage 2 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I ■ I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------4-------------------------- tblLandUse LotAcreage 3.48 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Crushing/Proc. Equipment tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Crawler Tractors tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Crawler Tractors tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 5.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 5.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 4.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00 tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 0.17 0.00 tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 334.05 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 9.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 5.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 14.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 132.00 104.00 tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CC_TTP 48.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:55 PMPage 3 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied : : -----------------------------+-----------------------------+------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ 2.0 Emissions Summary tblVehicleTrips CNW_TTP 19.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TTP 41.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP 33.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP 59.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 28.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 5.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 6.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 3.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 66.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 92.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.96 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.74 0.00 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.19 0.00 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.74 0.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 0.78 0.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.74 0.00 tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 82,179,312.50 0.00 tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 2,335,303.45 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:55 PMPage 4 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied : : -----------------------------+-----------------------------+------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2022 4.9679 50.6796 47.1235 0.1074 23.6020 2.1626 25.7646 10.5658 1.9897 12.5555 0.0000 10,663.78 53 10,663.78 53 2.2534 0.3965 10,815.56 85 2023 81.8647 44.9526 65.6878 0.1405 5.3833 2.0164 7.3997 1.4428 1.8930 3.3358 0.0000 13,916.93 82 13,916.93 82 2.0802 0.3961 14,086.98 98 Maximum 81.8647 50.6796 65.6878 0.1405 23.6020 2.1626 25.7646 10.5658 1.9897 12.5555 0.0000 13,916.93 82 13,916.93 82 2.2534 0.3965 14,086.98 98 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2022 4.9679 50.6796 47.1235 0.1074 9.3471 2.1626 11.5097 4.1588 1.9897 6.1485 0.0000 10,663.78 53 10,663.78 53 2.2534 0.3965 10,815.56 85 2023 81.8647 44.9526 65.6878 0.1405 5.3833 2.0164 7.3997 1.4428 1.8930 3.3358 0.0000 13,916.93 82 13,916.93 82 2.0802 0.3961 14,086.98 98 Maximum 81.8647 50.6796 65.6878 0.1405 9.3471 2.1626 11.5097 4.1588 1.9897 6.1485 0.0000 13,916.93 82 13,916.93 82 2.2534 0.3965 14,086.98 98 Mitigated Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:55 PMPage 5 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I I I •• I •• I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"-------1' - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------,-- - - - - - - ., ., I I I I ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.18 0.00 42.98 53.35 0.00 40.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:55 PMPage 6 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 8.1107 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.2387 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 8.1107 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.0000 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.2387 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 8.1107 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.2387 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 8.1107 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.0000 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.2387 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:55 PMPage 7 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I I •• I •• I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------••••••••1-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I •• I •• I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------••••••••1-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ., ., I I I I 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition/Crushing Demolition 9/1/2022 9/28/2022 5 20 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 9/29/2022 10/12/2022 5 10 3 Grading Grading 10/13/2022 11/23/2022 5 30 4 Building Construction Building Construction 11/24/2022 9/27/2023 5 220 5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 8/3/2023 9/27/2023 5 40 6 Paving Paving 8/31/2023 9/27/2023 5 20 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 8.00 78 0.48 Demolition/Crushing Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Building Construction Cranes 2 8.00 231 0.29 Demolition/Crushing Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 533,055; Non-Residential Outdoor: 177,685; Striped Parking Area: 21,985 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 50 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 150 Acres of Paving: 8.41 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:55 PMPage 8 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■ ■ I -------J------------------------1-----------------------l------------~------------~--------4--------~-------------------------• ■ 1 I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I -------J------------------------1-----------------------l------------~------------~--------4--------~-------------------------• ■ 1 I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I -------J------------------------1-----------------------l------------~------------~--------4--------~-------------------------• ■ 1 I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I -------J------------------------1-----------------------l------------~------------~--------4--------~-------------------------• ■ 1 I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I -------J------------------------~----------------------..... ------------~------------~--------~--------~------------------------- I I I I I I I ····························1---------------------------~---------------········-·····~--------+·············· I I I I ····························1---------------------------~----------------·············~--------+·············· I I ····························1---------------------------~----------------·······-·····~--------+·············· I I I I -••--•••••••••••••••••••••••~--------------------------..,_ ________________ ~ -----------~-------------r•••••••••••••• 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Building Construction Forklifts 5 8.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 2 8.00 84 0.74 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36 Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38 Demolition/Crushing Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 5 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 2 8.00 46 0.45 Demolition/Crushing Crushing/Proc. Equipment 1 8.00 85 0.78 Site Preparation Crawler Tractors 4 8.00 212 0.43 Grading Crawler Tractors 2 8.00 212 0.43 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition/Crushing 7 18.00 9.00 10.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 5.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 14.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 16 339.00 104.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 68.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:55 PMPage 9 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied : ----------------------------•--------------------------+-----------------------~-------------~--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------t---------T--------------1 I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------T--------------1 I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------t---------T--------------1 I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------T--------------1 I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------t---------T--------------1 I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I I I ----------------------------~--------------------------~----------------~ -----------~-------------~-------------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~----------• I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~----------• I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~----------• I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~----------• I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------~---------------1-----------~---------+---------~-----------I-----------~---------~------------~---------!----------- 3.2 Demolition/Crushing - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.1070 0.0000 0.1070 0.0162 0.0000 0.0162 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1186 28.9444 24.9253 0.0458 1.4227 1.4227 1.3353 1.3353 4,411.311 3 4,411.311 3 1.0957 4,438.703 8 Total 3.1186 28.9444 24.9253 0.0458 0.1070 1.4227 1.5297 0.0162 1.3353 1.3515 4,411.311 3 4,411.311 3 1.0957 4,438.703 8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Water Exposed Area CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:55 PMPage 10 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • • • • • • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • I I I I 3.2 Demolition/Crushing - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 1.8900e- 003 0.0682 0.0178 2.9000e- 004 8.7600e- 003 7.2000e- 004 9.4700e- 003 2.4000e- 003 6.8000e- 004 3.0900e- 003 32.0233 32.0233 1.3700e- 003 5.0700e- 003 33.5698 Vendor 0.0157 0.3941 0.1446 1.6800e- 003 0.0577 4.6900e- 003 0.0624 0.0166 4.4900e- 003 0.0211 180.0620 180.0620 4.8700e- 003 0.0267 188.1242 Worker 0.0762 0.0483 0.7415 1.8600e- 003 0.2012 1.0600e- 003 0.2023 0.0534 9.7000e- 004 0.0543 188.9222 188.9222 4.9100e- 003 4.7000e- 003 190.4461 Total 0.0938 0.5105 0.9040 3.8300e- 003 0.2676 6.4700e- 003 0.2741 0.0724 6.1400e- 003 0.0785 401.0074 401.0074 0.0112 0.0364 412.1400 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.0417 0.0000 0.0417 6.3200e- 003 0.0000 6.3200e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1186 28.9444 24.9253 0.0458 1.4227 1.4227 1.3353 1.3353 0.0000 4,411.311 3 4,411.311 3 1.0957 4,438.703 8 Total 3.1186 28.9444 24.9253 0.0458 0.0417 1.4227 1.4645 6.3200e- 003 1.3353 1.3417 0.0000 4,411.311 3 4,411.311 3 1.0957 4,438.703 8 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:55 PMPage 11 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.2 Demolition/Crushing - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 1.8900e- 003 0.0682 0.0178 2.9000e- 004 8.7600e- 003 7.2000e- 004 9.4700e- 003 2.4000e- 003 6.8000e- 004 3.0900e- 003 32.0233 32.0233 1.3700e- 003 5.0700e- 003 33.5698 Vendor 0.0157 0.3941 0.1446 1.6800e- 003 0.0577 4.6900e- 003 0.0624 0.0166 4.4900e- 003 0.0211 180.0620 180.0620 4.8700e- 003 0.0267 188.1242 Worker 0.0762 0.0483 0.7415 1.8600e- 003 0.2012 1.0600e- 003 0.2023 0.0534 9.7000e- 004 0.0543 188.9222 188.9222 4.9100e- 003 4.7000e- 003 190.4461 Total 0.0938 0.5105 0.9040 3.8300e- 003 0.2676 6.4700e- 003 0.2741 0.0724 6.1400e- 003 0.0785 401.0074 401.0074 0.0112 0.0364 412.1400 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 23.3688 0.0000 23.3688 10.5032 0.0000 10.5032 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.4790 50.4124 20.0053 0.0570 2.1590 2.1590 1.9862 1.9862 5,517.235 5 5,517.235 5 1.7844 5,561.845 1 Total 4.4790 50.4124 20.0053 0.0570 23.3688 2.1590 25.5277 10.5032 1.9862 12.4895 5,517.235 5 5,517.235 5 1.7844 5,561.845 1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:55 PMPage 12 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.7100e- 003 0.2190 0.0804 9.3000e- 004 0.0320 2.6100e- 003 0.0346 9.2200e- 003 2.4900e- 003 0.0117 100.0344 100.0344 2.7000e- 003 0.0148 104.5134 Worker 0.0762 0.0483 0.7415 1.8600e- 003 0.2012 1.0600e- 003 0.2023 0.0534 9.7000e- 004 0.0543 188.9222 188.9222 4.9100e- 003 4.7000e- 003 190.4461 Total 0.0849 0.2672 0.8219 2.7900e- 003 0.2332 3.6700e- 003 0.2369 0.0626 3.4600e- 003 0.0661 288.9567 288.9567 7.6100e- 003 0.0195 294.9595 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 9.1138 0.0000 9.1138 4.0963 0.0000 4.0963 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.4790 50.4124 20.0053 0.0570 2.1590 2.1590 1.9862 1.9862 0.0000 5,517.235 5 5,517.235 5 1.7844 5,561.845 1 Total 4.4790 50.4124 20.0053 0.0570 9.1138 2.1590 11.2728 4.0963 1.9862 6.0825 0.0000 5,517.235 5 5,517.235 5 1.7844 5,561.845 1 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:55 PMPage 13 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.7100e- 003 0.2190 0.0804 9.3000e- 004 0.0320 2.6100e- 003 0.0346 9.2200e- 003 2.4900e- 003 0.0117 100.0344 100.0344 2.7000e- 003 0.0148 104.5134 Worker 0.0762 0.0483 0.7415 1.8600e- 003 0.2012 1.0600e- 003 0.2023 0.0534 9.7000e- 004 0.0543 188.9222 188.9222 4.9100e- 003 4.7000e- 003 190.4461 Total 0.0849 0.2672 0.8219 2.7900e- 003 0.2332 3.6700e- 003 0.2369 0.0626 3.4600e- 003 0.0661 288.9567 288.9567 7.6100e- 003 0.0195 294.9595 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 11.3246 0.0000 11.3246 3.8828 0.0000 3.8828 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.2792 47.5079 29.1953 0.0715 1.9081 1.9081 1.7554 1.7554 6,926.997 4 6,926.997 4 2.2403 6,983.005 6 Total 4.2792 47.5079 29.1953 0.0715 11.3246 1.9081 13.2327 3.8828 1.7554 5.6382 6,926.997 4 6,926.997 4 2.2403 6,983.005 6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:55 PMPage 14 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.4 Grading - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0244 0.6131 0.2250 2.6100e- 003 0.0897 7.2900e- 003 0.0970 0.0258 6.9800e- 003 0.0328 280.0964 280.0964 7.5700e- 003 0.0415 292.6376 Worker 0.0847 0.0537 0.8239 2.0600e- 003 0.2236 1.1700e- 003 0.2247 0.0593 1.0800e- 003 0.0604 209.9136 209.9136 5.4600e- 003 5.2200e- 003 211.6067 Total 0.1091 0.6667 1.0489 4.6700e- 003 0.3133 8.4600e- 003 0.3217 0.0851 8.0600e- 003 0.0932 490.0100 490.0100 0.0130 0.0467 504.2443 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 4.4166 0.0000 4.4166 1.5143 0.0000 1.5143 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.2792 47.5079 29.1953 0.0715 1.9081 1.9081 1.7554 1.7554 0.0000 6,926.997 4 6,926.997 4 2.2403 6,983.005 6 Total 4.2792 47.5079 29.1953 0.0715 4.4166 1.9081 6.3247 1.5143 1.7554 3.2697 0.0000 6,926.997 4 6,926.997 4 2.2403 6,983.005 6 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:55 PMPage 15 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.4 Grading - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0244 0.6131 0.2250 2.6100e- 003 0.0897 7.2900e- 003 0.0970 0.0258 6.9800e- 003 0.0328 280.0964 280.0964 7.5700e- 003 0.0415 292.6376 Worker 0.0847 0.0537 0.8239 2.0600e- 003 0.2236 1.1700e- 003 0.2247 0.0593 1.0800e- 003 0.0604 209.9136 209.9136 5.4600e- 003 5.2200e- 003 211.6067 Total 0.1091 0.6667 1.0489 4.6700e- 003 0.3133 8.4600e- 003 0.3217 0.0851 8.0600e- 003 0.0932 490.0100 490.0100 0.0130 0.0467 504.2443 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.3510 30.8035 31.4867 0.0530 1.5691 1.5691 1.4773 1.4773 5,025.034 2 5,025.034 2 1.1968 5,054.955 2 Total 3.3510 30.8035 31.4867 0.0530 1.5691 1.5691 1.4773 1.4773 5,025.034 2 5,025.034 2 1.1968 5,054.955 2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:55 PMPage 16 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1812 4.5542 1.6714 0.0194 0.6663 0.0542 0.7205 0.1919 0.0518 0.2437 2,080.715 9 2,080.715 9 0.0562 0.3079 2,173.879 3 Worker 1.4357 0.9094 13.9654 0.0350 3.7892 0.0199 3.8091 1.0049 0.0183 1.0232 3,558.035 3 3,558.035 3 0.0925 0.0885 3,586.734 0 Total 1.6170 5.4635 15.6368 0.0544 4.4555 0.0741 4.5296 1.1968 0.0702 1.2669 5,638.751 2 5,638.751 2 0.1488 0.3965 5,760.613 3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.3510 30.8035 31.4867 0.0530 1.5691 1.5691 1.4773 1.4773 0.0000 5,025.034 2 5,025.034 2 1.1968 5,054.955 2 Total 3.3510 30.8035 31.4867 0.0530 1.5691 1.5691 1.4773 1.4773 0.0000 5,025.034 2 5,025.034 2 1.1968 5,054.955 2 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:55 PMPage 17 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1812 4.5542 1.6714 0.0194 0.6663 0.0542 0.7205 0.1919 0.0518 0.2437 2,080.715 9 2,080.715 9 0.0562 0.3079 2,173.879 3 Worker 1.4357 0.9094 13.9654 0.0350 3.7892 0.0199 3.8091 1.0049 0.0183 1.0232 3,558.035 3 3,558.035 3 0.0925 0.0885 3,586.734 0 Total 1.6170 5.4635 15.6368 0.0544 4.4555 0.0741 4.5296 1.1968 0.0702 1.2669 5,638.751 2 5,638.751 2 0.1488 0.3965 5,760.613 3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.0930 28.3801 31.2440 0.0530 1.3610 1.3610 1.2815 1.2815 5,026.699 7 5,026.699 7 1.1886 5,056.415 1 Total 3.0930 28.3801 31.2440 0.0530 1.3610 1.3610 1.2815 1.2815 5,026.699 7 5,026.699 7 1.1886 5,056.415 1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:55 PMPage 18 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1217 3.6479 1.5307 0.0186 0.6663 0.0274 0.6937 0.1919 0.0262 0.2181 1,995.949 1 1,995.949 1 0.0522 0.2948 2,085.087 8 Worker 1.3256 0.7999 12.7840 0.0338 3.7892 0.0187 3.8079 1.0049 0.0172 1.0222 3,463.456 4 3,463.456 4 0.0827 0.0814 3,489.794 5 Total 1.4473 4.4477 14.3147 0.0525 4.4555 0.0461 4.5017 1.1968 0.0435 1.2402 5,459.405 4 5,459.405 4 0.1349 0.3762 5,574.882 4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.0930 28.3801 31.2440 0.0530 1.3610 1.3610 1.2815 1.2815 0.0000 5,026.699 7 5,026.699 7 1.1886 5,056.415 1 Total 3.0930 28.3801 31.2440 0.0530 1.3610 1.3610 1.2815 1.2815 0.0000 5,026.699 7 5,026.699 7 1.1886 5,056.415 1 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:55 PMPage 19 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1217 3.6479 1.5307 0.0186 0.6663 0.0274 0.6937 0.1919 0.0262 0.2181 1,995.949 1 1,995.949 1 0.0522 0.2948 2,085.087 8 Worker 1.3256 0.7999 12.7840 0.0338 3.7892 0.0187 3.8079 1.0049 0.0172 1.0222 3,463.456 4 3,463.456 4 0.0827 0.0814 3,489.794 5 Total 1.4473 4.4477 14.3147 0.0525 4.4555 0.0461 4.5017 1.1968 0.0435 1.2402 5,459.405 4 5,459.405 4 0.1349 0.3762 5,574.882 4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 74.6099 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2556 1.7373 2.4148 3.9600e- 003 0.0944 0.0944 0.0944 0.0944 375.2641 375.2641 0.0225 375.8253 Total 74.8654 1.7373 2.4148 3.9600e- 003 0.0944 0.0944 0.0944 0.0944 375.2641 375.2641 0.0225 375.8253 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:55 PMPage 20 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2659 0.1604 2.5644 6.7900e- 003 0.7601 3.7600e- 003 0.7638 0.2016 3.4600e- 003 0.2050 694.7346 694.7346 0.0166 0.0163 700.0178 Total 0.2659 0.1604 2.5644 6.7900e- 003 0.7601 3.7600e- 003 0.7638 0.2016 3.4600e- 003 0.2050 694.7346 694.7346 0.0166 0.0163 700.0178 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 74.6099 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2556 1.7373 2.4148 3.9600e- 003 0.0944 0.0944 0.0944 0.0944 0.0000 375.2641 375.2641 0.0225 375.8253 Total 74.8654 1.7373 2.4148 3.9600e- 003 0.0944 0.0944 0.0944 0.0944 0.0000 375.2641 375.2641 0.0225 375.8253 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:55 PMPage 21 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2659 0.1604 2.5644 6.7900e- 003 0.7601 3.7600e- 003 0.7638 0.2016 3.4600e- 003 0.2050 694.7346 694.7346 0.0166 0.0163 700.0178 Total 0.2659 0.1604 2.5644 6.7900e- 003 0.7601 3.7600e- 003 0.7638 0.2016 3.4600e- 003 0.2050 694.7346 694.7346 0.0166 0.0163 700.0178 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Paving - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584 1 0.7140 2,225.433 6 Paving 1.1017 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 2.1345 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584 1 0.7140 2,225.433 6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:55 PMPage 22 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.7 Paving - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0587 0.0354 0.5657 1.5000e- 003 0.1677 8.3000e- 004 0.1685 0.0445 7.6000e- 004 0.0452 153.2503 153.2503 3.6600e- 003 3.6000e- 003 154.4157 Total 0.0587 0.0354 0.5657 1.5000e- 003 0.1677 8.3000e- 004 0.1685 0.0445 7.6000e- 004 0.0452 153.2503 153.2503 3.6600e- 003 3.6000e- 003 154.4157 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584 1 0.7140 2,225.433 6 Paving 1.1017 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 2.1345 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584 1 0.7140 2,225.433 6 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:55 PMPage 23 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.7 Paving - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0587 0.0354 0.5657 1.5000e- 003 0.1677 8.3000e- 004 0.1685 0.0445 7.6000e- 004 0.0452 153.2503 153.2503 3.6600e- 003 3.6000e- 003 154.4157 Total 0.0587 0.0354 0.5657 1.5000e- 003 0.1677 8.3000e- 004 0.1685 0.0445 7.6000e- 004 0.0452 153.2503 153.2503 3.6600e- 003 3.6000e- 003 154.4157 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:55 PMPage 24 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I I ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:55 PMPage 25 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I --------. --.,..-------,.-------.--------.--------.--------.--------,.-------.--------.--------.--------• -. -----,--------.--------,--------.-------.... -----. -., ., ., ., I I I I ~•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••l--------------~-----------i·········••4••······················1·························· • I I ■ ■ ~•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••l--------------~-----------t·········••4------------------------1-------------------------- • I I ■ ■ ~•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••l--------------~-----------t··········•4------------------------I-------------------------- • I I -- I I I I I I I I I ■ I I -■ - • I I ■ I I ---~-----------------------r----------~---------T----------y---------r---------r-----------r----------------------r----------------- • I I -I I --- • I ' -I I ---~-----------------------r----------~---------T----------y---------r----•••-•r---•••--•••r--••••--•••r•••--••••-r•--••••--••••--•• • I I ■ I I --- • I I -I I ---~ ----------• ----• -------• • - - - -• • - - -T - - -• • - - - -T -• - -• • • • - -T • • - - -• • • ·r -• • • - - -• ·r - -• • • • - -• • • r - -• • • • - -• • • • • • • - -• • • • -r • - -• • • • - -• • • • - -• • . • Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH City Park 0.537785 0.055838 0.172353 0.139003 0.027005 0.007196 0.011392 0.017285 0.000559 0.000254 0.025303 0.000954 0.005071 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.537785 0.055838 0.172353 0.139003 0.027005 0.007196 0.011392 0.017285 0.000559 0.000254 0.025303 0.000954 0.005071 Parking Lot 0.537785 0.055838 0.172353 0.139003 0.027005 0.007196 0.011392 0.017285 0.000559 0.000254 0.025303 0.000954 0.005071 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.537785 0.055838 0.172353 0.139003 0.027005 0.007196 0.011392 0.017285 0.000559 0.000254 0.025303 0.000954 0.005071 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:55 PMPage 26 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied .. .. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - --=-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --~ - - - - - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - --=-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --~ - - - - - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - --=----------l----------l----------l----------l----------l----------l----------1----------1----------1----------I----------I-- - - - - - - - ' I I ■e I I I I I I I I I I e I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------· - - - - - --~-------r--------r--------r--------r - - - - - - -.. .. 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:55 PMPage 27 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I """"""" """" ,-------..-------T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T------,--------t """""" -,-------T ______ T ______ T ______ "T """"""" 1 •• I I I I I I I I I • 1 I I I I "' I I I I I I I I I I I I I "' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:55 PMPage 28 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I """"""" """" ,-------..-------T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T------,--------t """""" -,-------T ______ T ______ T ______ "T """"""" 1 •• I I I I I I I I I • 1 I I I I "' I I I I I I I I I I I I I "' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 8.1107 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.2387 Unmitigated 8.1107 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.2387 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.9305 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 7.1705 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 9.6800e- 003 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.2387 Total 8.1107 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.2387 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:55 PMPage 29 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I . -----. ----~-------,.-------.--------.--------,.-------.--------.--------.--------.--------,.-------• -------,-------.... -------.--------,.------.... ---. --. . , ., ., ., ' ' ' ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••--------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••--------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' ' 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.9305 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 7.1705 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 9.6800e- 003 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.2387 Total 8.1107 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.2387 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:55 PMPage 30 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I 11.0 Vegetation 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 8.0 Waste Detail 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:55 PMPage 31 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter Project Characteristics - Land Use - Total Project Area is 18.53 acres Construction Phase - Construction anticipated to begin September 2022 and end in September 2023 Off-road Equipment - Crushing anticipated to occur during Demolition. As such, Crushing/Proc. Equipment has been added Off-road Equipment - Crawler Tractors used in lieu of Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Off-road Equipment - Crawler Tractors used in lieu of Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Off-road Equipment - Hours are based on an 8-hour workday Off-road Equipment - Hours based on an 8-hour workday Off-road Equipment - 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 355.37 1000sqft 8.16 355,370.00 0 Parking Lot 387.00 Space 2.00 87,341.00 0 City Park 1.96 Acre 1.96 85,590.00 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 279.07 1000sqft 6.41 279,068.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 10 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 32 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2023Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 390.98 0.033CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.004N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:54 PMPage 1 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I 1 I • • I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -;. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --=-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -• • I I I ■ • I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -;. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --=-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -• • I I I ■ • I I I ------------------------------1------------------------------~------------------------------wi---------------~-----------------~--------------- Grading - Analysis assumes that up 5 acres will be disturbed per day Demolition - Trips and VMT - Vendor Trips adjusted based on CalEEMod defaults for Building Construction and number of days for Demolition, Site Preparation, Grading, and Building Construction Architectural Coating - Rule 1113 Vehicle Trips - Construction run only Energy Use - Construction run only Water And Wastewater - Construction run only Solid Waste - Construction run only Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Rule 403 Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 100.00 50.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 40.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 220.00 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 3/13/2024 9/27/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 1/17/2024 9/27/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 2/14/2024 9/27/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 2/15/2024 8/3/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 1/18/2024 8/31/2023 tblEnergyUse LightingElect 0.35 0.00 tblEnergyUse LightingElect 1.17 0.00 tblEnergyUse NT24E 0.82 0.00 tblEnergyUse NT24NG 0.03 0.00 tblEnergyUse T24E 0.33 0.00 tblEnergyUse T24NG 1.98 0.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 120.00 150.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 35.00 50.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 154,800.00 87,341.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 85,377.60 85,590.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:54 PMPage 2 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I ■ I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------4-------------------------- tblLandUse LotAcreage 3.48 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Crushing/Proc. Equipment tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Crawler Tractors tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Crawler Tractors tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 5.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 5.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 4.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00 tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 0.17 0.00 tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 334.05 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 9.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 5.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 14.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 132.00 104.00 tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CC_TTP 48.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:54 PMPage 3 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied : : -----------------------------+-----------------------------+------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ 2.0 Emissions Summary tblVehicleTrips CNW_TTP 19.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TTP 41.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP 33.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP 59.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 28.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 5.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 6.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 3.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 66.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 92.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.96 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.74 0.00 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.19 0.00 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.74 0.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 0.78 0.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.74 0.00 tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 82,179,312.50 0.00 tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 2,335,303.45 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:54 PMPage 4 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied : : -----------------------------+-----------------------------+------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2022 4.9044 50.6930 44.6886 0.1041 23.6020 2.1626 25.7646 10.5658 1.9897 12.5555 0.0000 10,330.54 19 10,330.54 19 2.2533 0.3999 10,483.32 62 2023 81.7956 45.2090 62.9190 0.1366 5.3833 2.0165 7.3998 1.4428 1.8931 3.3359 0.0000 13,516.39 36 13,516.39 36 2.0799 0.4003 13,687.68 20 Maximum 81.7956 50.6930 62.9190 0.1366 23.6020 2.1626 25.7646 10.5658 1.9897 12.5555 0.0000 13,516.39 36 13,516.39 36 2.2533 0.4003 13,687.68 20 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2022 4.9044 50.6930 44.6886 0.1041 9.3471 2.1626 11.5097 4.1588 1.9897 6.1485 0.0000 10,330.54 19 10,330.54 19 2.2533 0.3999 10,483.32 62 2023 81.7956 45.2090 62.9190 0.1366 5.3833 2.0165 7.3998 1.4428 1.8931 3.3359 0.0000 13,516.39 36 13,516.39 36 2.0799 0.4003 13,687.68 20 Maximum 81.7956 50.6930 62.9190 0.1366 9.3471 2.1626 11.5097 4.1588 1.9897 6.1485 0.0000 13,516.39 36 13,516.39 36 2.2533 0.4003 13,687.68 20 Mitigated Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:54 PMPage 5 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I I I •• I •• I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"-------1' - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------,-- - - - - - - ., ., I I I I ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.18 0.00 42.98 53.35 0.00 40.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:54 PMPage 6 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 8.1107 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.2387 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 8.1107 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.0000 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.2387 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 8.1107 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.2387 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 8.1107 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.0000 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.2387 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:54 PMPage 7 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I I •• I •• I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------••••••••1-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I •• I •• I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------••••••••1-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ., ., I I I I 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition/Crushing Demolition 9/1/2022 9/28/2022 5 20 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 9/29/2022 10/12/2022 5 10 3 Grading Grading 10/13/2022 11/23/2022 5 30 4 Building Construction Building Construction 11/24/2022 9/27/2023 5 220 5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 8/3/2023 9/27/2023 5 40 6 Paving Paving 8/31/2023 9/27/2023 5 20 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 8.00 78 0.48 Demolition/Crushing Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Building Construction Cranes 2 8.00 231 0.29 Demolition/Crushing Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 533,055; Non-Residential Outdoor: 177,685; Striped Parking Area: 21,985 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 50 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 150 Acres of Paving: 8.41 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:54 PMPage 8 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■ ■ I -------J------------------------1-----------------------l------------~------------~--------4--------~-------------------------• ■ 1 I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I -------J------------------------1-----------------------l------------~------------~--------4--------~-------------------------• ■ 1 I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I -------J------------------------1-----------------------l------------~------------~--------4--------~-------------------------• ■ 1 I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I -------J------------------------1-----------------------l------------~------------~--------4--------~-------------------------• ■ 1 I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I -------J------------------------~----------------------..... ------------~------------~--------~--------~------------------------- I I I I I I I ····························1---------------------------~---------------········-·····~--------+·············· I I I I ····························1---------------------------~----------------·············~--------+·············· I I ····························1---------------------------~----------------·······-·····~--------+·············· I I I I -••--•••••••••••••••••••••••~--------------------------..,_ ________________ ~ -----------~-------------r•••••••••••••• 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Building Construction Forklifts 5 8.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 2 8.00 84 0.74 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36 Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38 Demolition/Crushing Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 5 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 2 8.00 46 0.45 Demolition/Crushing Crushing/Proc. Equipment 1 8.00 85 0.78 Site Preparation Crawler Tractors 4 8.00 212 0.43 Grading Crawler Tractors 2 8.00 212 0.43 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition/Crushing 7 18.00 9.00 10.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 5.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 14.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 16 339.00 104.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 68.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:54 PMPage 9 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied : ----------------------------•--------------------------+-----------------------~-------------~--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------t---------T--------------1 I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------T--------------1 I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------t---------T--------------1 I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------T--------------1 I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------t---------T--------------1 I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I I I ----------------------------~--------------------------~----------------~ -----------~-------------~-------------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~----------• I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~----------• I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~----------• I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~----------• I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------~---------------1-----------~---------+---------~-----------I-----------~---------~------------~---------!----------- 3.2 Demolition/Crushing - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.1070 0.0000 0.1070 0.0162 0.0000 0.0162 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1186 28.9444 24.9253 0.0458 1.4227 1.4227 1.3353 1.3353 4,411.311 3 4,411.311 3 1.0957 4,438.703 8 Total 3.1186 28.9444 24.9253 0.0458 0.1070 1.4227 1.5297 0.0162 1.3353 1.3515 4,411.311 3 4,411.311 3 1.0957 4,438.703 8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Water Exposed Area CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:54 PMPage 10 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • • • • • • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • I I I I 3.2 Demolition/Crushing - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 1.8100e- 003 0.0716 0.0182 2.9000e- 004 8.7600e- 003 7.2000e- 004 9.4700e- 003 2.4000e- 003 6.9000e- 004 3.0900e- 003 32.0472 32.0472 1.3700e- 003 5.0800e- 003 33.5947 Vendor 0.0151 0.4137 0.1497 1.6800e- 003 0.0577 4.7000e- 003 0.0624 0.0166 4.5000e- 003 0.0211 180.2606 180.2606 4.8400e- 003 0.0267 188.3358 Worker 0.0732 0.0508 0.6091 1.6800e- 003 0.2012 1.0600e- 003 0.2023 0.0534 9.7000e- 004 0.0543 171.1060 171.1060 4.9000e- 003 4.8500e- 003 172.6750 Total 0.0901 0.5361 0.7770 3.6500e- 003 0.2676 6.4800e- 003 0.2741 0.0724 6.1600e- 003 0.0785 383.4137 383.4137 0.0111 0.0366 394.6056 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.0417 0.0000 0.0417 6.3200e- 003 0.0000 6.3200e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1186 28.9444 24.9253 0.0458 1.4227 1.4227 1.3353 1.3353 0.0000 4,411.311 3 4,411.311 3 1.0957 4,438.703 8 Total 3.1186 28.9444 24.9253 0.0458 0.0417 1.4227 1.4645 6.3200e- 003 1.3353 1.3417 0.0000 4,411.311 3 4,411.311 3 1.0957 4,438.703 8 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:54 PMPage 11 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.2 Demolition/Crushing - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 1.8100e- 003 0.0716 0.0182 2.9000e- 004 8.7600e- 003 7.2000e- 004 9.4700e- 003 2.4000e- 003 6.9000e- 004 3.0900e- 003 32.0472 32.0472 1.3700e- 003 5.0800e- 003 33.5947 Vendor 0.0151 0.4137 0.1497 1.6800e- 003 0.0577 4.7000e- 003 0.0624 0.0166 4.5000e- 003 0.0211 180.2606 180.2606 4.8400e- 003 0.0267 188.3358 Worker 0.0732 0.0508 0.6091 1.6800e- 003 0.2012 1.0600e- 003 0.2023 0.0534 9.7000e- 004 0.0543 171.1060 171.1060 4.9000e- 003 4.8500e- 003 172.6750 Total 0.0901 0.5361 0.7770 3.6500e- 003 0.2676 6.4800e- 003 0.2741 0.0724 6.1600e- 003 0.0785 383.4137 383.4137 0.0111 0.0366 394.6056 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 23.3688 0.0000 23.3688 10.5032 0.0000 10.5032 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.4790 50.4124 20.0053 0.0570 2.1590 2.1590 1.9862 1.9862 5,517.235 5 5,517.235 5 1.7844 5,561.845 1 Total 4.4790 50.4124 20.0053 0.0570 23.3688 2.1590 25.5277 10.5032 1.9862 12.4895 5,517.235 5 5,517.235 5 1.7844 5,561.845 1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:54 PMPage 12 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.3700e- 003 0.2299 0.0832 9.3000e- 004 0.0320 2.6100e- 003 0.0347 9.2200e- 003 2.5000e- 003 0.0117 100.1448 100.1448 2.6900e- 003 0.0148 104.6310 Worker 0.0732 0.0508 0.6091 1.6800e- 003 0.2012 1.0600e- 003 0.2023 0.0534 9.7000e- 004 0.0543 171.1060 171.1060 4.9000e- 003 4.8500e- 003 172.6750 Total 0.0816 0.2806 0.6923 2.6100e- 003 0.2332 3.6700e- 003 0.2369 0.0626 3.4700e- 003 0.0661 271.2508 271.2508 7.5900e- 003 0.0197 277.3060 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 9.1138 0.0000 9.1138 4.0963 0.0000 4.0963 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.4790 50.4124 20.0053 0.0570 2.1590 2.1590 1.9862 1.9862 0.0000 5,517.235 5 5,517.235 5 1.7844 5,561.845 1 Total 4.4790 50.4124 20.0053 0.0570 9.1138 2.1590 11.2728 4.0963 1.9862 6.0825 0.0000 5,517.235 5 5,517.235 5 1.7844 5,561.845 1 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:54 PMPage 13 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.3700e- 003 0.2299 0.0832 9.3000e- 004 0.0320 2.6100e- 003 0.0347 9.2200e- 003 2.5000e- 003 0.0117 100.1448 100.1448 2.6900e- 003 0.0148 104.6310 Worker 0.0732 0.0508 0.6091 1.6800e- 003 0.2012 1.0600e- 003 0.2023 0.0534 9.7000e- 004 0.0543 171.1060 171.1060 4.9000e- 003 4.8500e- 003 172.6750 Total 0.0816 0.2806 0.6923 2.6100e- 003 0.2332 3.6700e- 003 0.2369 0.0626 3.4700e- 003 0.0661 271.2508 271.2508 7.5900e- 003 0.0197 277.3060 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 11.3246 0.0000 11.3246 3.8828 0.0000 3.8828 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.2792 47.5079 29.1953 0.0715 1.9081 1.9081 1.7554 1.7554 6,926.997 4 6,926.997 4 2.2403 6,983.005 6 Total 4.2792 47.5079 29.1953 0.0715 11.3246 1.9081 13.2327 3.8828 1.7554 5.6382 6,926.997 4 6,926.997 4 2.2403 6,983.005 6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:54 PMPage 14 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.4 Grading - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0235 0.6436 0.2329 2.6200e- 003 0.0897 7.3200e- 003 0.0970 0.0258 7.0000e- 003 0.0328 280.4053 280.4053 7.5200e- 003 0.0415 292.9668 Worker 0.0814 0.0564 0.6768 1.8700e- 003 0.2236 1.1700e- 003 0.2247 0.0593 1.0800e- 003 0.0604 190.1178 190.1178 5.4400e- 003 5.3900e- 003 191.8611 Total 0.1048 0.7000 0.9097 4.4900e- 003 0.3133 8.4900e- 003 0.3217 0.0851 8.0800e- 003 0.0932 470.5231 470.5231 0.0130 0.0469 484.8279 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 4.4166 0.0000 4.4166 1.5143 0.0000 1.5143 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.2792 47.5079 29.1953 0.0715 1.9081 1.9081 1.7554 1.7554 0.0000 6,926.997 4 6,926.997 4 2.2403 6,983.005 6 Total 4.2792 47.5079 29.1953 0.0715 4.4166 1.9081 6.3247 1.5143 1.7554 3.2697 0.0000 6,926.997 4 6,926.997 4 2.2403 6,983.005 6 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:54 PMPage 15 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.4 Grading - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0235 0.6436 0.2329 2.6200e- 003 0.0897 7.3200e- 003 0.0970 0.0258 7.0000e- 003 0.0328 280.4053 280.4053 7.5200e- 003 0.0415 292.9668 Worker 0.0814 0.0564 0.6768 1.8700e- 003 0.2236 1.1700e- 003 0.2247 0.0593 1.0800e- 003 0.0604 190.1178 190.1178 5.4400e- 003 5.3900e- 003 191.8611 Total 0.1048 0.7000 0.9097 4.4900e- 003 0.3133 8.4900e- 003 0.3217 0.0851 8.0800e- 003 0.0932 470.5231 470.5231 0.0130 0.0469 484.8279 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.3510 30.8035 31.4867 0.0530 1.5691 1.5691 1.4773 1.4773 5,025.034 2 5,025.034 2 1.1968 5,054.955 2 Total 3.3510 30.8035 31.4867 0.0530 1.5691 1.5691 1.4773 1.4773 5,025.034 2 5,025.034 2 1.1968 5,054.955 2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:54 PMPage 16 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1742 4.7809 1.7302 0.0194 0.6663 0.0544 0.7207 0.1919 0.0520 0.2439 2,083.010 9 2,083.010 9 0.0559 0.3085 2,176.324 9 Worker 1.3792 0.9565 11.4717 0.0317 3.7892 0.0199 3.8091 1.0049 0.0183 1.0232 3,222.496 8 3,222.496 8 0.0923 0.0914 3,252.046 1 Total 1.5534 5.7374 13.2019 0.0511 4.4555 0.0742 4.5298 1.1968 0.0703 1.2671 5,305.507 7 5,305.507 7 0.1482 0.3999 5,428.371 0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.3510 30.8035 31.4867 0.0530 1.5691 1.5691 1.4773 1.4773 0.0000 5,025.034 2 5,025.034 2 1.1968 5,054.955 2 Total 3.3510 30.8035 31.4867 0.0530 1.5691 1.5691 1.4773 1.4773 0.0000 5,025.034 2 5,025.034 2 1.1968 5,054.955 2 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:54 PMPage 17 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1742 4.7809 1.7302 0.0194 0.6663 0.0544 0.7207 0.1919 0.0520 0.2439 2,083.010 9 2,083.010 9 0.0559 0.3085 2,176.324 9 Worker 1.3792 0.9565 11.4717 0.0317 3.7892 0.0199 3.8091 1.0049 0.0183 1.0232 3,222.496 8 3,222.496 8 0.0923 0.0914 3,252.046 1 Total 1.5534 5.7374 13.2019 0.0511 4.4555 0.0742 4.5298 1.1968 0.0703 1.2671 5,305.507 7 5,305.507 7 0.1482 0.3999 5,428.371 0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.0930 28.3801 31.2440 0.0530 1.3610 1.3610 1.2815 1.2815 5,026.699 7 5,026.699 7 1.1886 5,056.415 1 Total 3.0930 28.3801 31.2440 0.0530 1.3610 1.3610 1.2815 1.2815 5,026.699 7 5,026.699 7 1.1886 5,056.415 1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:54 PMPage 18 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1133 3.8531 1.5779 0.0187 0.6663 0.0275 0.6938 0.1919 0.0263 0.2182 2,000.789 5 2,000.789 5 0.0518 0.2957 2,090.190 7 Worker 1.2769 0.8410 10.5219 0.0307 3.7892 0.0187 3.8079 1.0049 0.0172 1.0222 3,137.803 4 3,137.803 4 0.0828 0.0841 3,164.924 4 Total 1.3901 4.6941 12.0998 0.0493 4.4555 0.0463 4.5018 1.1968 0.0436 1.2403 5,138.592 9 5,138.592 9 0.1346 0.3797 5,255.115 1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.0930 28.3801 31.2440 0.0530 1.3610 1.3610 1.2815 1.2815 0.0000 5,026.699 7 5,026.699 7 1.1886 5,056.415 1 Total 3.0930 28.3801 31.2440 0.0530 1.3610 1.3610 1.2815 1.2815 0.0000 5,026.699 7 5,026.699 7 1.1886 5,056.415 1 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:54 PMPage 19 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1133 3.8531 1.5779 0.0187 0.6663 0.0275 0.6938 0.1919 0.0263 0.2182 2,000.789 5 2,000.789 5 0.0518 0.2957 2,090.190 7 Worker 1.2769 0.8410 10.5219 0.0307 3.7892 0.0187 3.8079 1.0049 0.0172 1.0222 3,137.803 4 3,137.803 4 0.0828 0.0841 3,164.924 4 Total 1.3901 4.6941 12.0998 0.0493 4.4555 0.0463 4.5018 1.1968 0.0436 1.2403 5,138.592 9 5,138.592 9 0.1346 0.3797 5,255.115 1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 74.6099 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2556 1.7373 2.4148 3.9600e- 003 0.0944 0.0944 0.0944 0.0944 375.2641 375.2641 0.0225 375.8253 Total 74.8654 1.7373 2.4148 3.9600e- 003 0.0944 0.0944 0.0944 0.0944 375.2641 375.2641 0.0225 375.8253 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:54 PMPage 20 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2561 0.1687 2.1106 6.1500e- 003 0.7601 3.7600e- 003 0.7638 0.2016 3.4600e- 003 0.2050 629.4119 629.4119 0.0166 0.0169 634.8521 Total 0.2561 0.1687 2.1106 6.1500e- 003 0.7601 3.7600e- 003 0.7638 0.2016 3.4600e- 003 0.2050 629.4119 629.4119 0.0166 0.0169 634.8521 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 74.6099 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2556 1.7373 2.4148 3.9600e- 003 0.0944 0.0944 0.0944 0.0944 0.0000 375.2641 375.2641 0.0225 375.8253 Total 74.8654 1.7373 2.4148 3.9600e- 003 0.0944 0.0944 0.0944 0.0944 0.0000 375.2641 375.2641 0.0225 375.8253 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:54 PMPage 21 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2561 0.1687 2.1106 6.1500e- 003 0.7601 3.7600e- 003 0.7638 0.2016 3.4600e- 003 0.2050 629.4119 629.4119 0.0166 0.0169 634.8521 Total 0.2561 0.1687 2.1106 6.1500e- 003 0.7601 3.7600e- 003 0.7638 0.2016 3.4600e- 003 0.2050 629.4119 629.4119 0.0166 0.0169 634.8521 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Paving - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584 1 0.7140 2,225.433 6 Paving 1.1017 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 2.1345 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584 1 0.7140 2,225.433 6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:54 PMPage 22 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.7 Paving - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0565 0.0372 0.4656 1.3600e- 003 0.1677 8.3000e- 004 0.1685 0.0445 7.6000e- 004 0.0452 138.8409 138.8409 3.6600e- 003 3.7200e- 003 140.0409 Total 0.0565 0.0372 0.4656 1.3600e- 003 0.1677 8.3000e- 004 0.1685 0.0445 7.6000e- 004 0.0452 138.8409 138.8409 3.6600e- 003 3.7200e- 003 140.0409 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584 1 0.7140 2,225.433 6 Paving 1.1017 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 2.1345 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584 1 0.7140 2,225.433 6 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:54 PMPage 23 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.7 Paving - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0565 0.0372 0.4656 1.3600e- 003 0.1677 8.3000e- 004 0.1685 0.0445 7.6000e- 004 0.0452 138.8409 138.8409 3.6600e- 003 3.7200e- 003 140.0409 Total 0.0565 0.0372 0.4656 1.3600e- 003 0.1677 8.3000e- 004 0.1685 0.0445 7.6000e- 004 0.0452 138.8409 138.8409 3.6600e- 003 3.7200e- 003 140.0409 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:54 PMPage 24 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I I ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:54 PMPage 25 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I --------. --.,..-------,.-------.--------.--------.--------.--------,.-------.--------.--------.--------• -. -----,--------.--------,--------.-------.... -----. -., ., ., ., I I I I ~•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••l--------------~-----------i·········••4••······················1·························· • I I ■ ■ ~•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••l--------------~-----------t·········••4------------------------1-------------------------- • I I ■ ■ ~•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••l--------------~-----------t··········•4------------------------I-------------------------- • I I -- I I I I I I I I I ■ I I -■ - • I I ■ I I ---~-----------------------r----------~---------T----------y---------r---------r-----------r----------------------r----------------- • I I -I I --- • I ' -I I ---~-----------------------r----------~---------T----------y---------r----•••-•r---•••--•••r--••••--•••r•••--••••-r•--••••--••••--•• • I I ■ I I --- • I I -I I ---~ ----------• ----• -------• • - - - -• • - - -T - - -• • - - - -T -• - -• • • • - -T • • - - -• • • ·r -• • • - - -• ·r - -• • • • - -• • • r - -• • • • - -• • • • • • • - -• • • • -r • - -• • • • - -• • • • - -• • . • Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH City Park 0.537785 0.055838 0.172353 0.139003 0.027005 0.007196 0.011392 0.017285 0.000559 0.000254 0.025303 0.000954 0.005071 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.537785 0.055838 0.172353 0.139003 0.027005 0.007196 0.011392 0.017285 0.000559 0.000254 0.025303 0.000954 0.005071 Parking Lot 0.537785 0.055838 0.172353 0.139003 0.027005 0.007196 0.011392 0.017285 0.000559 0.000254 0.025303 0.000954 0.005071 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.537785 0.055838 0.172353 0.139003 0.027005 0.007196 0.011392 0.017285 0.000559 0.000254 0.025303 0.000954 0.005071 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:54 PMPage 26 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied .. .. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - --=-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --~ - - - - - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - --=-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --~ - - - - - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - --=----------l----------l----------l----------l----------l----------l----------1----------1----------1----------I----------I-- - - - - - - - ' I I ■e I I I I I I I I I I e I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------· - - - - - --~-------r--------r--------r--------r - - - - - - -.. .. 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:54 PMPage 27 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I """"""" """" ,-------..-------T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T------,--------t """""" -,-------T ______ T ______ T ______ "T """"""" 1 •• I I I I I I I I I • 1 I I I I "' I I I I I I I I I I I I I "' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:54 PMPage 28 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I """"""" """" ,-------..-------T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T------,--------t """""" -,-------T ______ T ______ T ______ "T """"""" 1 •• I I I I I I I I I • 1 I I I I "' I I I I I I I I I I I I I "' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 8.1107 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.2387 Unmitigated 8.1107 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.2387 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.9305 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 7.1705 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 9.6800e- 003 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.2387 Total 8.1107 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.2387 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:54 PMPage 29 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I . -----. ----~-------,.-------.--------.--------,.-------.--------.--------.--------.--------,.-------• -------,-------.... -------.--------,.------.... ---. --. . , ., ., ., ' ' ' ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••--------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••--------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' ' 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.9305 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 7.1705 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 9.6800e- 003 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.2387 Total 8.1107 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.2387 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:54 PMPage 30 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I 11.0 Vegetation 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 8.0 Waste Detail 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:54 PMPage 31 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Unmitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report This page intentionally left blank Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report APPENDIX 3.2: CALEEMOD PROJECT CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS (MITIGATED) Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer Project Characteristics - Land Use - Total Project Area is 18.53 acres Construction Phase - Construction anticipated to begin September 2022 and end in September 2023 Off-road Equipment - Crushing anticipated to occur during Demolition. As such, Crushing/Proc. Equipment has been added Off-road Equipment - Crawler Tractors used in lieu of Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Off-road Equipment - Crawler Tractors used in lieu of Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Off-road Equipment - Hours are based on an 8-hour workday Off-road Equipment - Hours based on an 8-hour workday Off-road Equipment - 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 355.37 1000sqft 8.16 355,370.00 0 Parking Lot 387.00 Space 2.00 87,341.00 0 City Park 1.96 Acre 1.96 85,590.00 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 279.07 1000sqft 6.41 279,068.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 10 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 32 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2023Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 390.98 0.033CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.004N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:00 PMPage 1 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I 1 I • • I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -;. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --=-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -• • I I I ■ • I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -;. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --=-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -• • I I I ■ • I I I ------------------------------1------------------------------~------------------------------wi---------------~-----------------~--------------- Grading - Analysis assumes that up 5 acres will be disturbed per day Demolition - Trips and VMT - Vendor Trips adjusted based on CalEEMod defaults for Building Construction and number of days for Demolition, Site Preparation, Grading, and Building Construction Architectural Coating - Rule 1113 Vehicle Trips - Construction run only Energy Use - Construction run only Water And Wastewater - Construction run only Solid Waste - Construction run only Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Rule 403 Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 100.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 100.00 50.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 40.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 220.00 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 3/13/2024 9/27/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 1/17/2024 9/27/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 2/14/2024 9/27/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 2/15/2024 8/3/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 1/18/2024 8/31/2023 tblEnergyUse LightingElect 0.35 0.00 tblEnergyUse LightingElect 1.17 0.00 tblEnergyUse NT24E 0.82 0.00 tblEnergyUse NT24NG 0.03 0.00 tblEnergyUse T24E 0.33 0.00 tblEnergyUse T24NG 1.98 0.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 120.00 150.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 35.00 50.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 154,800.00 87,341.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:00 PMPage 2 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I ■ I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------4-------------------------- tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 85,377.60 85,590.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 3.48 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Crushing/Proc. Equipment tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Crawler Tractors tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Crawler Tractors tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 5.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 5.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 4.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00 tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 0.17 0.00 tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 334.05 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 9.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 5.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 14.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 132.00 104.00 tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CC_TTP 48.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:00 PMPage 3 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied : : -----------------------------+-----------------------------+------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ 2.0 Emissions Summary tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TTP 19.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TTP 41.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP 33.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP 59.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 28.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 5.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 6.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 3.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 66.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 92.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.96 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.74 0.00 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.19 0.00 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.74 0.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 0.78 0.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.74 0.00 tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 82,179,312.50 0.00 tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 2,335,303.45 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:00 PMPage 4 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied : : -----------------------------+-----------------------------+------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ -■ - 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2022 4.9679 50.6796 47.1235 0.1074 23.6020 2.1626 25.7646 10.5658 1.9897 12.5555 0.0000 10,663.78 53 10,663.78 53 2.2534 0.3965 10,815.56 85 2023 50.9808 44.9526 65.6878 0.1405 5.3833 2.0164 7.3997 1.4428 1.8930 3.3358 0.0000 13,916.93 82 13,916.93 82 2.0802 0.3961 14,086.98 98 Maximum 50.9808 50.6796 65.6878 0.1405 23.6020 2.1626 25.7646 10.5658 1.9897 12.5555 0.0000 13,916.93 82 13,916.93 82 2.2534 0.3965 14,086.98 98 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2022 4.9679 50.6796 47.1235 0.1074 9.3471 2.1626 11.5097 4.1588 1.9897 6.1485 0.0000 10,663.78 53 10,663.78 53 2.2534 0.3965 10,815.56 85 2023 50.9808 44.9526 65.6878 0.1405 5.3833 2.0164 7.3997 1.4428 1.8930 3.3358 0.0000 13,916.93 82 13,916.93 82 2.0802 0.3961 14,086.98 98 Maximum 50.9808 50.6796 65.6878 0.1405 9.3471 2.1626 11.5097 4.1588 1.9897 6.1485 0.0000 13,916.93 82 13,916.93 82 2.2534 0.3965 14,086.98 98 Mitigated Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:00 PMPage 5 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I I I •• I •• I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"-------1' - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------,-- - - - - - - ., ., I I I I ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.18 0.00 42.98 53.35 0.00 40.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:00 PMPage 6 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 8.1107 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.2387 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 8.1107 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.0000 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.2387 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 8.1107 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.2387 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 8.1107 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.0000 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.2387 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:00 PMPage 7 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I I •• I •• I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------••••••••1-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I •• I •• I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------••••••••1-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ., ., I I I I 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition/Crushing Demolition 9/1/2022 9/28/2022 5 20 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 9/29/2022 10/12/2022 5 10 3 Grading Grading 10/13/2022 11/23/2022 5 30 4 Building Construction Building Construction 11/24/2022 9/27/2023 5 220 5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 8/3/2023 9/27/2023 5 40 6 Paving Paving 8/31/2023 9/27/2023 5 20 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 8.00 78 0.48 Demolition/Crushing Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Building Construction Cranes 2 8.00 231 0.29 Demolition/Crushing Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 533,055; Non-Residential Outdoor: 177,685; Striped Parking Area: 21,985 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 50 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 150 Acres of Paving: 8.41 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:00 PMPage 8 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■ ■ I -------J------------------------1-----------------------l------------~------------~--------4--------~-------------------------• ■ 1 I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I -------J------------------------1-----------------------l------------~------------~--------4--------~-------------------------• ■ 1 I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I -------J------------------------1-----------------------l------------~------------~--------4--------~-------------------------• ■ 1 I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I -------J------------------------1-----------------------l------------~------------~--------4--------~-------------------------• ■ 1 I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I -------J------------------------~----------------------..... ------------~------------~--------~--------~------------------------- I I I I I I I ····························1---------------------------~---------------········-·····~--------+·············· I I I I ····························1---------------------------~----------------·············~--------+·············· I I ····························1---------------------------~----------------·······-·····~--------+·············· I I I I -••--•••••••••••••••••••••••~--------------------------..,_ ________________ ~ -----------~-------------r•••••••••••••• 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Building Construction Forklifts 5 8.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 2 8.00 84 0.74 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36 Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38 Demolition/Crushing Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 5 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 2 8.00 46 0.45 Demolition/Crushing Crushing/Proc. Equipment 1 8.00 85 0.78 Site Preparation Crawler Tractors 4 8.00 212 0.43 Grading Crawler Tractors 2 8.00 212 0.43 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition/Crushing 7 18.00 9.00 10.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 5.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 14.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 16 339.00 104.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 68.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:00 PMPage 9 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied : ----------------------------•--------------------------+-----------------------~-------------~--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------t---------T--------------1 I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------T--------------1 I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------t---------T--------------1 I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------T--------------1 I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------t---------T--------------1 I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I I I ----------------------------~--------------------------~----------------~ -----------~-------------~-------------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~----------• I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~----------• I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~----------• I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~----------• I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------~---------------1-----------~---------+---------~-----------I-----------~---------~------------~---------!----------- 3.2 Demolition/Crushing - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.1070 0.0000 0.1070 0.0162 0.0000 0.0162 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1186 28.9444 24.9253 0.0458 1.4227 1.4227 1.3353 1.3353 4,411.311 3 4,411.311 3 1.0957 4,438.703 8 Total 3.1186 28.9444 24.9253 0.0458 0.1070 1.4227 1.5297 0.0162 1.3353 1.3515 4,411.311 3 4,411.311 3 1.0957 4,438.703 8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Water Exposed Area CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:00 PMPage 10 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • • • • • • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • I I I I 3.2 Demolition/Crushing - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 1.8900e- 003 0.0682 0.0178 2.9000e- 004 8.7600e- 003 7.2000e- 004 9.4700e- 003 2.4000e- 003 6.8000e- 004 3.0900e- 003 32.0233 32.0233 1.3700e- 003 5.0700e- 003 33.5698 Vendor 0.0157 0.3941 0.1446 1.6800e- 003 0.0577 4.6900e- 003 0.0624 0.0166 4.4900e- 003 0.0211 180.0620 180.0620 4.8700e- 003 0.0267 188.1242 Worker 0.0762 0.0483 0.7415 1.8600e- 003 0.2012 1.0600e- 003 0.2023 0.0534 9.7000e- 004 0.0543 188.9222 188.9222 4.9100e- 003 4.7000e- 003 190.4461 Total 0.0938 0.5105 0.9040 3.8300e- 003 0.2676 6.4700e- 003 0.2741 0.0724 6.1400e- 003 0.0785 401.0074 401.0074 0.0112 0.0364 412.1400 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.0417 0.0000 0.0417 6.3200e- 003 0.0000 6.3200e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1186 28.9444 24.9253 0.0458 1.4227 1.4227 1.3353 1.3353 0.0000 4,411.311 3 4,411.311 3 1.0957 4,438.703 8 Total 3.1186 28.9444 24.9253 0.0458 0.0417 1.4227 1.4645 6.3200e- 003 1.3353 1.3417 0.0000 4,411.311 3 4,411.311 3 1.0957 4,438.703 8 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:00 PMPage 11 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.2 Demolition/Crushing - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 1.8900e- 003 0.0682 0.0178 2.9000e- 004 8.7600e- 003 7.2000e- 004 9.4700e- 003 2.4000e- 003 6.8000e- 004 3.0900e- 003 32.0233 32.0233 1.3700e- 003 5.0700e- 003 33.5698 Vendor 0.0157 0.3941 0.1446 1.6800e- 003 0.0577 4.6900e- 003 0.0624 0.0166 4.4900e- 003 0.0211 180.0620 180.0620 4.8700e- 003 0.0267 188.1242 Worker 0.0762 0.0483 0.7415 1.8600e- 003 0.2012 1.0600e- 003 0.2023 0.0534 9.7000e- 004 0.0543 188.9222 188.9222 4.9100e- 003 4.7000e- 003 190.4461 Total 0.0938 0.5105 0.9040 3.8300e- 003 0.2676 6.4700e- 003 0.2741 0.0724 6.1400e- 003 0.0785 401.0074 401.0074 0.0112 0.0364 412.1400 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 23.3688 0.0000 23.3688 10.5032 0.0000 10.5032 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.4790 50.4124 20.0053 0.0570 2.1590 2.1590 1.9862 1.9862 5,517.235 5 5,517.235 5 1.7844 5,561.845 1 Total 4.4790 50.4124 20.0053 0.0570 23.3688 2.1590 25.5277 10.5032 1.9862 12.4895 5,517.235 5 5,517.235 5 1.7844 5,561.845 1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:00 PMPage 12 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.7100e- 003 0.2190 0.0804 9.3000e- 004 0.0320 2.6100e- 003 0.0346 9.2200e- 003 2.4900e- 003 0.0117 100.0344 100.0344 2.7000e- 003 0.0148 104.5134 Worker 0.0762 0.0483 0.7415 1.8600e- 003 0.2012 1.0600e- 003 0.2023 0.0534 9.7000e- 004 0.0543 188.9222 188.9222 4.9100e- 003 4.7000e- 003 190.4461 Total 0.0849 0.2672 0.8219 2.7900e- 003 0.2332 3.6700e- 003 0.2369 0.0626 3.4600e- 003 0.0661 288.9567 288.9567 7.6100e- 003 0.0195 294.9595 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 9.1138 0.0000 9.1138 4.0963 0.0000 4.0963 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.4790 50.4124 20.0053 0.0570 2.1590 2.1590 1.9862 1.9862 0.0000 5,517.235 5 5,517.235 5 1.7844 5,561.845 1 Total 4.4790 50.4124 20.0053 0.0570 9.1138 2.1590 11.2728 4.0963 1.9862 6.0825 0.0000 5,517.235 5 5,517.235 5 1.7844 5,561.845 1 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:00 PMPage 13 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.7100e- 003 0.2190 0.0804 9.3000e- 004 0.0320 2.6100e- 003 0.0346 9.2200e- 003 2.4900e- 003 0.0117 100.0344 100.0344 2.7000e- 003 0.0148 104.5134 Worker 0.0762 0.0483 0.7415 1.8600e- 003 0.2012 1.0600e- 003 0.2023 0.0534 9.7000e- 004 0.0543 188.9222 188.9222 4.9100e- 003 4.7000e- 003 190.4461 Total 0.0849 0.2672 0.8219 2.7900e- 003 0.2332 3.6700e- 003 0.2369 0.0626 3.4600e- 003 0.0661 288.9567 288.9567 7.6100e- 003 0.0195 294.9595 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 11.3246 0.0000 11.3246 3.8828 0.0000 3.8828 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.2792 47.5079 29.1953 0.0715 1.9081 1.9081 1.7554 1.7554 6,926.997 4 6,926.997 4 2.2403 6,983.005 6 Total 4.2792 47.5079 29.1953 0.0715 11.3246 1.9081 13.2327 3.8828 1.7554 5.6382 6,926.997 4 6,926.997 4 2.2403 6,983.005 6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:00 PMPage 14 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.4 Grading - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0244 0.6131 0.2250 2.6100e- 003 0.0897 7.2900e- 003 0.0970 0.0258 6.9800e- 003 0.0328 280.0964 280.0964 7.5700e- 003 0.0415 292.6376 Worker 0.0847 0.0537 0.8239 2.0600e- 003 0.2236 1.1700e- 003 0.2247 0.0593 1.0800e- 003 0.0604 209.9136 209.9136 5.4600e- 003 5.2200e- 003 211.6067 Total 0.1091 0.6667 1.0489 4.6700e- 003 0.3133 8.4600e- 003 0.3217 0.0851 8.0600e- 003 0.0932 490.0100 490.0100 0.0130 0.0467 504.2443 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 4.4166 0.0000 4.4166 1.5143 0.0000 1.5143 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.2792 47.5079 29.1953 0.0715 1.9081 1.9081 1.7554 1.7554 0.0000 6,926.997 4 6,926.997 4 2.2403 6,983.005 6 Total 4.2792 47.5079 29.1953 0.0715 4.4166 1.9081 6.3247 1.5143 1.7554 3.2697 0.0000 6,926.997 4 6,926.997 4 2.2403 6,983.005 6 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:00 PMPage 15 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.4 Grading - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0244 0.6131 0.2250 2.6100e- 003 0.0897 7.2900e- 003 0.0970 0.0258 6.9800e- 003 0.0328 280.0964 280.0964 7.5700e- 003 0.0415 292.6376 Worker 0.0847 0.0537 0.8239 2.0600e- 003 0.2236 1.1700e- 003 0.2247 0.0593 1.0800e- 003 0.0604 209.9136 209.9136 5.4600e- 003 5.2200e- 003 211.6067 Total 0.1091 0.6667 1.0489 4.6700e- 003 0.3133 8.4600e- 003 0.3217 0.0851 8.0600e- 003 0.0932 490.0100 490.0100 0.0130 0.0467 504.2443 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.3510 30.8035 31.4867 0.0530 1.5691 1.5691 1.4773 1.4773 5,025.034 2 5,025.034 2 1.1968 5,054.955 2 Total 3.3510 30.8035 31.4867 0.0530 1.5691 1.5691 1.4773 1.4773 5,025.034 2 5,025.034 2 1.1968 5,054.955 2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:00 PMPage 16 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1812 4.5542 1.6714 0.0194 0.6663 0.0542 0.7205 0.1919 0.0518 0.2437 2,080.715 9 2,080.715 9 0.0562 0.3079 2,173.879 3 Worker 1.4357 0.9094 13.9654 0.0350 3.7892 0.0199 3.8091 1.0049 0.0183 1.0232 3,558.035 3 3,558.035 3 0.0925 0.0885 3,586.734 0 Total 1.6170 5.4635 15.6368 0.0544 4.4555 0.0741 4.5296 1.1968 0.0702 1.2669 5,638.751 2 5,638.751 2 0.1488 0.3965 5,760.613 3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.3510 30.8035 31.4867 0.0530 1.5691 1.5691 1.4773 1.4773 0.0000 5,025.034 2 5,025.034 2 1.1968 5,054.955 2 Total 3.3510 30.8035 31.4867 0.0530 1.5691 1.5691 1.4773 1.4773 0.0000 5,025.034 2 5,025.034 2 1.1968 5,054.955 2 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:00 PMPage 17 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1812 4.5542 1.6714 0.0194 0.6663 0.0542 0.7205 0.1919 0.0518 0.2437 2,080.715 9 2,080.715 9 0.0562 0.3079 2,173.879 3 Worker 1.4357 0.9094 13.9654 0.0350 3.7892 0.0199 3.8091 1.0049 0.0183 1.0232 3,558.035 3 3,558.035 3 0.0925 0.0885 3,586.734 0 Total 1.6170 5.4635 15.6368 0.0544 4.4555 0.0741 4.5296 1.1968 0.0702 1.2669 5,638.751 2 5,638.751 2 0.1488 0.3965 5,760.613 3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.0930 28.3801 31.2440 0.0530 1.3610 1.3610 1.2815 1.2815 5,026.699 7 5,026.699 7 1.1886 5,056.415 1 Total 3.0930 28.3801 31.2440 0.0530 1.3610 1.3610 1.2815 1.2815 5,026.699 7 5,026.699 7 1.1886 5,056.415 1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:00 PMPage 18 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1217 3.6479 1.5307 0.0186 0.6663 0.0274 0.6937 0.1919 0.0262 0.2181 1,995.949 1 1,995.949 1 0.0522 0.2948 2,085.087 8 Worker 1.3256 0.7999 12.7840 0.0338 3.7892 0.0187 3.8079 1.0049 0.0172 1.0222 3,463.456 4 3,463.456 4 0.0827 0.0814 3,489.794 5 Total 1.4473 4.4477 14.3147 0.0525 4.4555 0.0461 4.5017 1.1968 0.0435 1.2402 5,459.405 4 5,459.405 4 0.1349 0.3762 5,574.882 4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.0930 28.3801 31.2440 0.0530 1.3610 1.3610 1.2815 1.2815 0.0000 5,026.699 7 5,026.699 7 1.1886 5,056.415 1 Total 3.0930 28.3801 31.2440 0.0530 1.3610 1.3610 1.2815 1.2815 0.0000 5,026.699 7 5,026.699 7 1.1886 5,056.415 1 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:00 PMPage 19 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1217 3.6479 1.5307 0.0186 0.6663 0.0274 0.6937 0.1919 0.0262 0.2181 1,995.949 1 1,995.949 1 0.0522 0.2948 2,085.087 8 Worker 1.3256 0.7999 12.7840 0.0338 3.7892 0.0187 3.8079 1.0049 0.0172 1.0222 3,463.456 4 3,463.456 4 0.0827 0.0814 3,489.794 5 Total 1.4473 4.4477 14.3147 0.0525 4.4555 0.0461 4.5017 1.1968 0.0435 1.2402 5,459.405 4 5,459.405 4 0.1349 0.3762 5,574.882 4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 43.7260 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2556 1.7373 2.4148 3.9600e- 003 0.0944 0.0944 0.0944 0.0944 375.2641 375.2641 0.0225 375.8253 Total 43.9816 1.7373 2.4148 3.9600e- 003 0.0944 0.0944 0.0944 0.0944 375.2641 375.2641 0.0225 375.8253 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:00 PMPage 20 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2659 0.1604 2.5644 6.7900e- 003 0.7601 3.7600e- 003 0.7638 0.2016 3.4600e- 003 0.2050 694.7346 694.7346 0.0166 0.0163 700.0178 Total 0.2659 0.1604 2.5644 6.7900e- 003 0.7601 3.7600e- 003 0.7638 0.2016 3.4600e- 003 0.2050 694.7346 694.7346 0.0166 0.0163 700.0178 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 43.7260 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2556 1.7373 2.4148 3.9600e- 003 0.0944 0.0944 0.0944 0.0944 0.0000 375.2641 375.2641 0.0225 375.8253 Total 43.9816 1.7373 2.4148 3.9600e- 003 0.0944 0.0944 0.0944 0.0944 0.0000 375.2641 375.2641 0.0225 375.8253 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:00 PMPage 21 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2659 0.1604 2.5644 6.7900e- 003 0.7601 3.7600e- 003 0.7638 0.2016 3.4600e- 003 0.2050 694.7346 694.7346 0.0166 0.0163 700.0178 Total 0.2659 0.1604 2.5644 6.7900e- 003 0.7601 3.7600e- 003 0.7638 0.2016 3.4600e- 003 0.2050 694.7346 694.7346 0.0166 0.0163 700.0178 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Paving - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584 1 0.7140 2,225.433 6 Paving 1.1017 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 2.1345 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584 1 0.7140 2,225.433 6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:00 PMPage 22 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.7 Paving - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0587 0.0354 0.5657 1.5000e- 003 0.1677 8.3000e- 004 0.1685 0.0445 7.6000e- 004 0.0452 153.2503 153.2503 3.6600e- 003 3.6000e- 003 154.4157 Total 0.0587 0.0354 0.5657 1.5000e- 003 0.1677 8.3000e- 004 0.1685 0.0445 7.6000e- 004 0.0452 153.2503 153.2503 3.6600e- 003 3.6000e- 003 154.4157 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584 1 0.7140 2,225.433 6 Paving 1.1017 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 2.1345 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584 1 0.7140 2,225.433 6 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:00 PMPage 23 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.7 Paving - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0587 0.0354 0.5657 1.5000e- 003 0.1677 8.3000e- 004 0.1685 0.0445 7.6000e- 004 0.0452 153.2503 153.2503 3.6600e- 003 3.6000e- 003 154.4157 Total 0.0587 0.0354 0.5657 1.5000e- 003 0.1677 8.3000e- 004 0.1685 0.0445 7.6000e- 004 0.0452 153.2503 153.2503 3.6600e- 003 3.6000e- 003 154.4157 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:00 PMPage 24 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I I ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:00 PMPage 25 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I --------. --.,..-------,.-------.--------.--------.--------.--------,.-------.--------.--------.--------• -. -----,--------.--------,--------.-------.... -----. -., ., ., ., I I I I ~•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••l--------------~-----------i·········••4••······················1·························· • I I ■ ■ ~•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••l--------------~-----------t·········••4------------------------1-------------------------- • I I ■ ■ ~•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••l--------------~-----------t··········•4------------------------I-------------------------- • I I -- I I I I I I I I I ■ I I -■ - • I I ■ I I ---~-----------------------r----------~---------T----------y---------r---------r-----------r----------------------r----------------- • I I -I I --- • I ' -I I ---~-----------------------r----------~---------T----------y---------r----•••-•r---•••--•••r--••••--•••r•••--••••-r•--••••--••••--•• • I I ■ I I --- • I I -I I ---~ ----------• ----• -------• • - - - -• • - - -T - - -• • - - - -T -• - -• • • • - -T • • - - -• • • ·r -• • • - - -• ·r - -• • • • - -• • • r - -• • • • - -• • • • • • • - -• • • • -r • - -• • • • - -• • • • - -• • . • Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH City Park 0.537785 0.055838 0.172353 0.139003 0.027005 0.007196 0.011392 0.017285 0.000559 0.000254 0.025303 0.000954 0.005071 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.537785 0.055838 0.172353 0.139003 0.027005 0.007196 0.011392 0.017285 0.000559 0.000254 0.025303 0.000954 0.005071 Parking Lot 0.537785 0.055838 0.172353 0.139003 0.027005 0.007196 0.011392 0.017285 0.000559 0.000254 0.025303 0.000954 0.005071 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.537785 0.055838 0.172353 0.139003 0.027005 0.007196 0.011392 0.017285 0.000559 0.000254 0.025303 0.000954 0.005071 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:00 PMPage 26 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied .. .. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - --=-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --~ - - - - - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - --=-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --~ - - - - - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - --=----------l----------l----------l----------l----------l----------l----------1----------1----------1----------I----------I-- - - - - - - - ' I I ■e I I I I I I I I I I e I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------· - - - - - --~-------r--------r--------r--------r - - - - - - -.. .. 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:00 PMPage 27 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I """"""" """" ,-------..-------T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T------,--------t """""" -,-------T ______ T ______ T ______ "T """"""" 1 •• I I I I I I I I I • 1 I I I I "' I I I I I I I I I I I I I "' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:00 PMPage 28 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I """"""" """" ,-------..-------T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T------,--------t """""" -,-------T ______ T ______ T ______ "T """"""" 1 •• I I I I I I I I I • 1 I I I I "' I I I I I I I I I I I I I "' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 8.1107 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.2387 Unmitigated 8.1107 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.2387 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.9305 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 7.1705 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 9.6800e- 003 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.2387 Total 8.1107 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.2387 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:00 PMPage 29 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I . -----. ----~-------,.-------.--------.--------,.-------.--------.--------.--------.--------,.-------• -------,-------.... -------.--------,.------.... ---. --. . , ., ., ., ' ' ' ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••--------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••--------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' ' 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.9305 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 7.1705 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 9.6800e- 003 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.2387 Total 8.1107 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.2387 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:00 PMPage 30 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I 11.0 Vegetation 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 8.0 Waste Detail 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:00 PMPage 31 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter Project Characteristics - Land Use - Total Project Area is 18.53 acres Construction Phase - Construction anticipated to begin September 2022 and end in September 2023 Off-road Equipment - Crushing anticipated to occur during Demolition. As such, Crushing/Proc. Equipment has been added Off-road Equipment - Crawler Tractors used in lieu of Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Off-road Equipment - Crawler Tractors used in lieu of Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Off-road Equipment - Hours are based on an 8-hour workday Off-road Equipment - Hours based on an 8-hour workday Off-road Equipment - 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 355.37 1000sqft 8.16 355,370.00 0 Parking Lot 387.00 Space 2.00 87,341.00 0 City Park 1.96 Acre 1.96 85,590.00 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 279.07 1000sqft 6.41 279,068.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 10 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 32 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2023Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 390.98 0.033CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.004N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:59 PMPage 1 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I 1 I • • I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -;. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --=-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -• • I I I ■ • I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -;. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --=-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -• • I I I ■ • I I I ------------------------------1------------------------------~------------------------------wi---------------~-----------------~--------------- Grading - Analysis assumes that up 5 acres will be disturbed per day Demolition - Trips and VMT - Vendor Trips adjusted based on CalEEMod defaults for Building Construction and number of days for Demolition, Site Preparation, Grading, and Building Construction Architectural Coating - Rule 1113 Vehicle Trips - Construction run only Energy Use - Construction run only Water And Wastewater - Construction run only Solid Waste - Construction run only Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Rule 403 Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 100.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 100.00 50.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 40.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 220.00 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 3/13/2024 9/27/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 1/17/2024 9/27/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 2/14/2024 9/27/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 2/15/2024 8/3/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 1/18/2024 8/31/2023 tblEnergyUse LightingElect 0.35 0.00 tblEnergyUse LightingElect 1.17 0.00 tblEnergyUse NT24E 0.82 0.00 tblEnergyUse NT24NG 0.03 0.00 tblEnergyUse T24E 0.33 0.00 tblEnergyUse T24NG 1.98 0.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 120.00 150.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 35.00 50.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 154,800.00 87,341.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:59 PMPage 2 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I ■ I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------■ ■ I ■ I -----------------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------4-------------------------- tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 85,377.60 85,590.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 3.48 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Crushing/Proc. Equipment tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Crawler Tractors tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Crawler Tractors tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 5.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 5.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 4.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00 tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 0.17 0.00 tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 334.05 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 9.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 5.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 14.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 132.00 104.00 tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CC_TTP 48.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:59 PMPage 3 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied : : -----------------------------+-----------------------------+------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ 2.0 Emissions Summary tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TTP 19.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TTP 41.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP 33.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP 59.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 28.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 5.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 6.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 3.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 66.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 92.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.96 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.74 0.00 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.19 0.00 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.74 0.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 0.78 0.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.74 0.00 tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 82,179,312.50 0.00 tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 2,335,303.45 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:59 PMPage 4 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied : : -----------------------------+-----------------------------+------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ -■ - 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2022 4.9044 50.6930 44.6886 0.1041 23.6020 2.1626 25.7646 10.5658 1.9897 12.5555 0.0000 10,330.54 19 10,330.54 19 2.2533 0.3999 10,483.32 62 2023 50.9118 45.2090 62.9190 0.1366 5.3833 2.0165 7.3998 1.4428 1.8931 3.3359 0.0000 13,516.39 36 13,516.39 36 2.0799 0.4003 13,687.68 20 Maximum 50.9118 50.6930 62.9190 0.1366 23.6020 2.1626 25.7646 10.5658 1.9897 12.5555 0.0000 13,516.39 36 13,516.39 36 2.2533 0.4003 13,687.68 20 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2022 4.9044 50.6930 44.6886 0.1041 9.3471 2.1626 11.5097 4.1588 1.9897 6.1485 0.0000 10,330.54 19 10,330.54 19 2.2533 0.3999 10,483.32 62 2023 50.9118 45.2090 62.9190 0.1366 5.3833 2.0165 7.3998 1.4428 1.8931 3.3359 0.0000 13,516.39 36 13,516.39 36 2.0799 0.4003 13,687.68 20 Maximum 50.9118 50.6930 62.9190 0.1366 9.3471 2.1626 11.5097 4.1588 1.9897 6.1485 0.0000 13,516.39 36 13,516.39 36 2.2533 0.4003 13,687.68 20 Mitigated Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:59 PMPage 5 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I I I •• I •• I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"-------1' - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------,-- - - - - - - ., ., I I I I ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.18 0.00 42.98 53.35 0.00 40.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:59 PMPage 6 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 8.1107 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.2387 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 8.1107 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.0000 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.2387 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 8.1107 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.2387 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 8.1107 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.0000 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.2387 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:59 PMPage 7 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I I •• I •• I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------••••••••1-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I •• I •• I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------••••••••1-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ., ., I I I I 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition/Crushing Demolition 9/1/2022 9/28/2022 5 20 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 9/29/2022 10/12/2022 5 10 3 Grading Grading 10/13/2022 11/23/2022 5 30 4 Building Construction Building Construction 11/24/2022 9/27/2023 5 220 5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 8/3/2023 9/27/2023 5 40 6 Paving Paving 8/31/2023 9/27/2023 5 20 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 8.00 78 0.48 Demolition/Crushing Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Building Construction Cranes 2 8.00 231 0.29 Demolition/Crushing Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 533,055; Non-Residential Outdoor: 177,685; Striped Parking Area: 21,985 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 50 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 150 Acres of Paving: 8.41 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:59 PMPage 8 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■ ■ I -------J------------------------1-----------------------l------------~------------~--------4--------~-------------------------• ■ 1 I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I -------J------------------------1-----------------------l------------~------------~--------4--------~-------------------------• ■ 1 I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I -------J------------------------1-----------------------l------------~------------~--------4--------~-------------------------• ■ 1 I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I -------J------------------------1-----------------------l------------~------------~--------4--------~-------------------------• ■ 1 I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I -------J------------------------~----------------------..... ------------~------------~--------~--------~------------------------- I I I I I I I ····························1---------------------------~---------------········-·····~--------+·············· I I I I ····························1---------------------------~----------------·············~--------+·············· I I ····························1---------------------------~----------------·······-·····~--------+·············· I I I I -••--•••••••••••••••••••••••~--------------------------..,_ ________________ ~ -----------~-------------r•••••••••••••• 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Building Construction Forklifts 5 8.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 2 8.00 84 0.74 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36 Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38 Demolition/Crushing Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 5 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 2 8.00 46 0.45 Demolition/Crushing Crushing/Proc. Equipment 1 8.00 85 0.78 Site Preparation Crawler Tractors 4 8.00 212 0.43 Grading Crawler Tractors 2 8.00 212 0.43 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition/Crushing 7 18.00 9.00 10.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 5.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 14.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 16 339.00 104.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 68.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:59 PMPage 9 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied : ----------------------------•--------------------------+-----------------------~-------------~--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------t---------T--------------1 I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------T--------------1 I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------t---------T--------------1 I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------T--------------1 I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------t---------T--------------1 I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------~--------+--------------' I I I ----------------------------~--------------------------~----------------~ -----------~-------------~-------------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~----------• I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~----------• I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~----------• I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------l----------~----------1--------------1----------~----------• I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------~---------------1-----------~---------+---------~-----------I-----------~---------~------------~---------!----------- 3.2 Demolition/Crushing - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.1070 0.0000 0.1070 0.0162 0.0000 0.0162 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1186 28.9444 24.9253 0.0458 1.4227 1.4227 1.3353 1.3353 4,411.311 3 4,411.311 3 1.0957 4,438.703 8 Total 3.1186 28.9444 24.9253 0.0458 0.1070 1.4227 1.5297 0.0162 1.3353 1.3515 4,411.311 3 4,411.311 3 1.0957 4,438.703 8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Water Exposed Area CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:59 PMPage 10 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • • • • • • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • I I I I 3.2 Demolition/Crushing - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 1.8100e- 003 0.0716 0.0182 2.9000e- 004 8.7600e- 003 7.2000e- 004 9.4700e- 003 2.4000e- 003 6.9000e- 004 3.0900e- 003 32.0472 32.0472 1.3700e- 003 5.0800e- 003 33.5947 Vendor 0.0151 0.4137 0.1497 1.6800e- 003 0.0577 4.7000e- 003 0.0624 0.0166 4.5000e- 003 0.0211 180.2606 180.2606 4.8400e- 003 0.0267 188.3358 Worker 0.0732 0.0508 0.6091 1.6800e- 003 0.2012 1.0600e- 003 0.2023 0.0534 9.7000e- 004 0.0543 171.1060 171.1060 4.9000e- 003 4.8500e- 003 172.6750 Total 0.0901 0.5361 0.7770 3.6500e- 003 0.2676 6.4800e- 003 0.2741 0.0724 6.1600e- 003 0.0785 383.4137 383.4137 0.0111 0.0366 394.6056 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.0417 0.0000 0.0417 6.3200e- 003 0.0000 6.3200e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1186 28.9444 24.9253 0.0458 1.4227 1.4227 1.3353 1.3353 0.0000 4,411.311 3 4,411.311 3 1.0957 4,438.703 8 Total 3.1186 28.9444 24.9253 0.0458 0.0417 1.4227 1.4645 6.3200e- 003 1.3353 1.3417 0.0000 4,411.311 3 4,411.311 3 1.0957 4,438.703 8 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:59 PMPage 11 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.2 Demolition/Crushing - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 1.8100e- 003 0.0716 0.0182 2.9000e- 004 8.7600e- 003 7.2000e- 004 9.4700e- 003 2.4000e- 003 6.9000e- 004 3.0900e- 003 32.0472 32.0472 1.3700e- 003 5.0800e- 003 33.5947 Vendor 0.0151 0.4137 0.1497 1.6800e- 003 0.0577 4.7000e- 003 0.0624 0.0166 4.5000e- 003 0.0211 180.2606 180.2606 4.8400e- 003 0.0267 188.3358 Worker 0.0732 0.0508 0.6091 1.6800e- 003 0.2012 1.0600e- 003 0.2023 0.0534 9.7000e- 004 0.0543 171.1060 171.1060 4.9000e- 003 4.8500e- 003 172.6750 Total 0.0901 0.5361 0.7770 3.6500e- 003 0.2676 6.4800e- 003 0.2741 0.0724 6.1600e- 003 0.0785 383.4137 383.4137 0.0111 0.0366 394.6056 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 23.3688 0.0000 23.3688 10.5032 0.0000 10.5032 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.4790 50.4124 20.0053 0.0570 2.1590 2.1590 1.9862 1.9862 5,517.235 5 5,517.235 5 1.7844 5,561.845 1 Total 4.4790 50.4124 20.0053 0.0570 23.3688 2.1590 25.5277 10.5032 1.9862 12.4895 5,517.235 5 5,517.235 5 1.7844 5,561.845 1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:59 PMPage 12 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.3700e- 003 0.2299 0.0832 9.3000e- 004 0.0320 2.6100e- 003 0.0347 9.2200e- 003 2.5000e- 003 0.0117 100.1448 100.1448 2.6900e- 003 0.0148 104.6310 Worker 0.0732 0.0508 0.6091 1.6800e- 003 0.2012 1.0600e- 003 0.2023 0.0534 9.7000e- 004 0.0543 171.1060 171.1060 4.9000e- 003 4.8500e- 003 172.6750 Total 0.0816 0.2806 0.6923 2.6100e- 003 0.2332 3.6700e- 003 0.2369 0.0626 3.4700e- 003 0.0661 271.2508 271.2508 7.5900e- 003 0.0197 277.3060 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 9.1138 0.0000 9.1138 4.0963 0.0000 4.0963 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.4790 50.4124 20.0053 0.0570 2.1590 2.1590 1.9862 1.9862 0.0000 5,517.235 5 5,517.235 5 1.7844 5,561.845 1 Total 4.4790 50.4124 20.0053 0.0570 9.1138 2.1590 11.2728 4.0963 1.9862 6.0825 0.0000 5,517.235 5 5,517.235 5 1.7844 5,561.845 1 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:59 PMPage 13 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.3700e- 003 0.2299 0.0832 9.3000e- 004 0.0320 2.6100e- 003 0.0347 9.2200e- 003 2.5000e- 003 0.0117 100.1448 100.1448 2.6900e- 003 0.0148 104.6310 Worker 0.0732 0.0508 0.6091 1.6800e- 003 0.2012 1.0600e- 003 0.2023 0.0534 9.7000e- 004 0.0543 171.1060 171.1060 4.9000e- 003 4.8500e- 003 172.6750 Total 0.0816 0.2806 0.6923 2.6100e- 003 0.2332 3.6700e- 003 0.2369 0.0626 3.4700e- 003 0.0661 271.2508 271.2508 7.5900e- 003 0.0197 277.3060 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 11.3246 0.0000 11.3246 3.8828 0.0000 3.8828 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.2792 47.5079 29.1953 0.0715 1.9081 1.9081 1.7554 1.7554 6,926.997 4 6,926.997 4 2.2403 6,983.005 6 Total 4.2792 47.5079 29.1953 0.0715 11.3246 1.9081 13.2327 3.8828 1.7554 5.6382 6,926.997 4 6,926.997 4 2.2403 6,983.005 6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:59 PMPage 14 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.4 Grading - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0235 0.6436 0.2329 2.6200e- 003 0.0897 7.3200e- 003 0.0970 0.0258 7.0000e- 003 0.0328 280.4053 280.4053 7.5200e- 003 0.0415 292.9668 Worker 0.0814 0.0564 0.6768 1.8700e- 003 0.2236 1.1700e- 003 0.2247 0.0593 1.0800e- 003 0.0604 190.1178 190.1178 5.4400e- 003 5.3900e- 003 191.8611 Total 0.1048 0.7000 0.9097 4.4900e- 003 0.3133 8.4900e- 003 0.3217 0.0851 8.0800e- 003 0.0932 470.5231 470.5231 0.0130 0.0469 484.8279 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 4.4166 0.0000 4.4166 1.5143 0.0000 1.5143 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.2792 47.5079 29.1953 0.0715 1.9081 1.9081 1.7554 1.7554 0.0000 6,926.997 4 6,926.997 4 2.2403 6,983.005 6 Total 4.2792 47.5079 29.1953 0.0715 4.4166 1.9081 6.3247 1.5143 1.7554 3.2697 0.0000 6,926.997 4 6,926.997 4 2.2403 6,983.005 6 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:59 PMPage 15 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.4 Grading - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0235 0.6436 0.2329 2.6200e- 003 0.0897 7.3200e- 003 0.0970 0.0258 7.0000e- 003 0.0328 280.4053 280.4053 7.5200e- 003 0.0415 292.9668 Worker 0.0814 0.0564 0.6768 1.8700e- 003 0.2236 1.1700e- 003 0.2247 0.0593 1.0800e- 003 0.0604 190.1178 190.1178 5.4400e- 003 5.3900e- 003 191.8611 Total 0.1048 0.7000 0.9097 4.4900e- 003 0.3133 8.4900e- 003 0.3217 0.0851 8.0800e- 003 0.0932 470.5231 470.5231 0.0130 0.0469 484.8279 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.3510 30.8035 31.4867 0.0530 1.5691 1.5691 1.4773 1.4773 5,025.034 2 5,025.034 2 1.1968 5,054.955 2 Total 3.3510 30.8035 31.4867 0.0530 1.5691 1.5691 1.4773 1.4773 5,025.034 2 5,025.034 2 1.1968 5,054.955 2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:59 PMPage 16 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1742 4.7809 1.7302 0.0194 0.6663 0.0544 0.7207 0.1919 0.0520 0.2439 2,083.010 9 2,083.010 9 0.0559 0.3085 2,176.324 9 Worker 1.3792 0.9565 11.4717 0.0317 3.7892 0.0199 3.8091 1.0049 0.0183 1.0232 3,222.496 8 3,222.496 8 0.0923 0.0914 3,252.046 1 Total 1.5534 5.7374 13.2019 0.0511 4.4555 0.0742 4.5298 1.1968 0.0703 1.2671 5,305.507 7 5,305.507 7 0.1482 0.3999 5,428.371 0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.3510 30.8035 31.4867 0.0530 1.5691 1.5691 1.4773 1.4773 0.0000 5,025.034 2 5,025.034 2 1.1968 5,054.955 2 Total 3.3510 30.8035 31.4867 0.0530 1.5691 1.5691 1.4773 1.4773 0.0000 5,025.034 2 5,025.034 2 1.1968 5,054.955 2 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:59 PMPage 17 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1742 4.7809 1.7302 0.0194 0.6663 0.0544 0.7207 0.1919 0.0520 0.2439 2,083.010 9 2,083.010 9 0.0559 0.3085 2,176.324 9 Worker 1.3792 0.9565 11.4717 0.0317 3.7892 0.0199 3.8091 1.0049 0.0183 1.0232 3,222.496 8 3,222.496 8 0.0923 0.0914 3,252.046 1 Total 1.5534 5.7374 13.2019 0.0511 4.4555 0.0742 4.5298 1.1968 0.0703 1.2671 5,305.507 7 5,305.507 7 0.1482 0.3999 5,428.371 0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.0930 28.3801 31.2440 0.0530 1.3610 1.3610 1.2815 1.2815 5,026.699 7 5,026.699 7 1.1886 5,056.415 1 Total 3.0930 28.3801 31.2440 0.0530 1.3610 1.3610 1.2815 1.2815 5,026.699 7 5,026.699 7 1.1886 5,056.415 1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:59 PMPage 18 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1133 3.8531 1.5779 0.0187 0.6663 0.0275 0.6938 0.1919 0.0263 0.2182 2,000.789 5 2,000.789 5 0.0518 0.2957 2,090.190 7 Worker 1.2769 0.8410 10.5219 0.0307 3.7892 0.0187 3.8079 1.0049 0.0172 1.0222 3,137.803 4 3,137.803 4 0.0828 0.0841 3,164.924 4 Total 1.3901 4.6941 12.0998 0.0493 4.4555 0.0463 4.5018 1.1968 0.0436 1.2403 5,138.592 9 5,138.592 9 0.1346 0.3797 5,255.115 1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.0930 28.3801 31.2440 0.0530 1.3610 1.3610 1.2815 1.2815 0.0000 5,026.699 7 5,026.699 7 1.1886 5,056.415 1 Total 3.0930 28.3801 31.2440 0.0530 1.3610 1.3610 1.2815 1.2815 0.0000 5,026.699 7 5,026.699 7 1.1886 5,056.415 1 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:59 PMPage 19 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1133 3.8531 1.5779 0.0187 0.6663 0.0275 0.6938 0.1919 0.0263 0.2182 2,000.789 5 2,000.789 5 0.0518 0.2957 2,090.190 7 Worker 1.2769 0.8410 10.5219 0.0307 3.7892 0.0187 3.8079 1.0049 0.0172 1.0222 3,137.803 4 3,137.803 4 0.0828 0.0841 3,164.924 4 Total 1.3901 4.6941 12.0998 0.0493 4.4555 0.0463 4.5018 1.1968 0.0436 1.2403 5,138.592 9 5,138.592 9 0.1346 0.3797 5,255.115 1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 43.7260 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2556 1.7373 2.4148 3.9600e- 003 0.0944 0.0944 0.0944 0.0944 375.2641 375.2641 0.0225 375.8253 Total 43.9816 1.7373 2.4148 3.9600e- 003 0.0944 0.0944 0.0944 0.0944 375.2641 375.2641 0.0225 375.8253 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:59 PMPage 20 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2561 0.1687 2.1106 6.1500e- 003 0.7601 3.7600e- 003 0.7638 0.2016 3.4600e- 003 0.2050 629.4119 629.4119 0.0166 0.0169 634.8521 Total 0.2561 0.1687 2.1106 6.1500e- 003 0.7601 3.7600e- 003 0.7638 0.2016 3.4600e- 003 0.2050 629.4119 629.4119 0.0166 0.0169 634.8521 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 43.7260 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2556 1.7373 2.4148 3.9600e- 003 0.0944 0.0944 0.0944 0.0944 0.0000 375.2641 375.2641 0.0225 375.8253 Total 43.9816 1.7373 2.4148 3.9600e- 003 0.0944 0.0944 0.0944 0.0944 0.0000 375.2641 375.2641 0.0225 375.8253 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:59 PMPage 21 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2561 0.1687 2.1106 6.1500e- 003 0.7601 3.7600e- 003 0.7638 0.2016 3.4600e- 003 0.2050 629.4119 629.4119 0.0166 0.0169 634.8521 Total 0.2561 0.1687 2.1106 6.1500e- 003 0.7601 3.7600e- 003 0.7638 0.2016 3.4600e- 003 0.2050 629.4119 629.4119 0.0166 0.0169 634.8521 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Paving - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584 1 0.7140 2,225.433 6 Paving 1.1017 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 2.1345 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584 1 0.7140 2,225.433 6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:59 PMPage 22 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.7 Paving - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0565 0.0372 0.4656 1.3600e- 003 0.1677 8.3000e- 004 0.1685 0.0445 7.6000e- 004 0.0452 138.8409 138.8409 3.6600e- 003 3.7200e- 003 140.0409 Total 0.0565 0.0372 0.4656 1.3600e- 003 0.1677 8.3000e- 004 0.1685 0.0445 7.6000e- 004 0.0452 138.8409 138.8409 3.6600e- 003 3.7200e- 003 140.0409 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584 1 0.7140 2,225.433 6 Paving 1.1017 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 2.1345 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584 1 0.7140 2,225.433 6 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:59 PMPage 23 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I I 3.7 Paving - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0565 0.0372 0.4656 1.3600e- 003 0.1677 8.3000e- 004 0.1685 0.0445 7.6000e- 004 0.0452 138.8409 138.8409 3.6600e- 003 3.7200e- 003 140.0409 Total 0.0565 0.0372 0.4656 1.3600e- 003 0.1677 8.3000e- 004 0.1685 0.0445 7.6000e- 004 0.0452 138.8409 138.8409 3.6600e- 003 3.7200e- 003 140.0409 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:59 PMPage 24 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I I ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:59 PMPage 25 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I --------. --.,..-------,.-------.--------.--------.--------.--------,.-------.--------.--------.--------• -. -----,--------.--------,--------.-------.... -----. -., ., ., ., I I I I ~•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••l--------------~-----------i·········••4••······················1·························· • I I ■ ■ ~•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••l--------------~-----------t·········••4------------------------1-------------------------- • I I ■ ■ ~•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••l--------------~-----------t··········•4------------------------I-------------------------- • I I -- I I I I I I I I I ■ I I -■ - • I I ■ I I ---~-----------------------r----------~---------T----------y---------r---------r-----------r----------------------r----------------- • I I -I I --- • I ' -I I ---~-----------------------r----------~---------T----------y---------r----•••-•r---•••--•••r--••••--•••r•••--••••-r•--••••--••••--•• • I I ■ I I --- • I I -I I ---~ ----------• ----• -------• • - - - -• • - - -T - - -• • - - - -T -• - -• • • • - -T • • - - -• • • ·r -• • • - - -• ·r - -• • • • - -• • • r - -• • • • - -• • • • • • • - -• • • • -r • - -• • • • - -• • • • - -• • . • Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH City Park 0.537785 0.055838 0.172353 0.139003 0.027005 0.007196 0.011392 0.017285 0.000559 0.000254 0.025303 0.000954 0.005071 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.537785 0.055838 0.172353 0.139003 0.027005 0.007196 0.011392 0.017285 0.000559 0.000254 0.025303 0.000954 0.005071 Parking Lot 0.537785 0.055838 0.172353 0.139003 0.027005 0.007196 0.011392 0.017285 0.000559 0.000254 0.025303 0.000954 0.005071 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.537785 0.055838 0.172353 0.139003 0.027005 0.007196 0.011392 0.017285 0.000559 0.000254 0.025303 0.000954 0.005071 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:59 PMPage 26 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied .. .. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - --=-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --~ - - - - - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - --=-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --~ - - - - - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - --=----------l----------l----------l----------l----------l----------l----------1----------1----------1----------I----------I-- - - - - - - - ' I I ■e I I I I I I I I I I e I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------· - - - - - --~-------r--------r--------r--------r - - - - - - -.. .. 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:59 PMPage 27 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I """"""" """" ,-------..-------T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T------,--------t """""" -,-------T ______ T ______ T ______ "T """"""" 1 •• I I I I I I I I I • 1 I I I I "' I I I I I I I I I I I I I "' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:59 PMPage 28 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I """"""" """" ,-------..-------T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T------,--------t """""" -,-------T ______ T ______ T ______ "T """"""" 1 •• I I I I I I I I I • 1 I I I I "' I I I I I I I I I I I I I "' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 8.1107 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.2387 Unmitigated 8.1107 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.2387 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.9305 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 7.1705 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 9.6800e- 003 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.2387 Total 8.1107 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.2387 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:59 PMPage 29 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I . -----. ----~-------,.-------.--------.--------,.-------.--------.--------.--------.--------,.-------• -------,-------.... -------.--------,.------.... ---. --. . , ., ., ., ' ' ' ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••--------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••--------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' ' 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.9305 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 7.1705 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 9.6800e- 003 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.2387 Total 8.1107 9.5000e- 004 0.1045 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 0.2240 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.2387 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:59 PMPage 30 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I 11.0 Vegetation 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 8.0 Waste Detail 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 1:59 PMPage 31 of 31 Fontana Corporate Center (Construction - Mitigated) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report This page intentionally left blank Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report APPENDIX 3.3: CALEEMOD EXISTING OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS Fontana Corporate Center (Existing Operations) San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer Project Characteristics - Land Use - Construction Phase - Operations run only Off-road Equipment - Operations run only Vehicle Trips - Trip characteristics based on information provided in the Traffic analysis Fleet Mix - Passenger Car Mix estimated based on the CalEEMod default fleet mix and the ratio of the vehicle classes (LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV, & MCY). Truck Mix based on information in the Traffic analysis 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Manufacturing 65.00 1000sqft 1.49 65,000.00 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 17.04 Acre 17.04 742,262.40 0 User Defined Industrial 65.00 User Defined Unit 0.00 0.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 10 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 32 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2023Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 390.98 0.033CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.004N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 0.00 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 9/28/2022 8/31/2022 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 4:31 PMPage 1 of 15 Fontana Corporate Center (Existing Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I 1 I • • I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -;. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --=-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -i ---------------• • I I I ■ • I I I ------------------------------1------------------------------~------------------------------wi---------------~-----------------~--------------- 1-----------------------------!-----------------------------l---------------------➔--------------------------I tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.00 tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.29 tblFleetMix LDA 0.54 0.58 tblFleetMix LDA 0.54 0.00 tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.06 tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.00 tblFleetMix LDT2 0.17 0.19 tblFleetMix LDT2 0.17 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD1 0.03 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD1 0.03 0.45 tblFleetMix LHD2 7.1960e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD2 7.1960e-003 0.12 tblFleetMix MCY 0.03 0.03 tblFleetMix MCY 0.03 0.00 tblFleetMix MDV 0.14 0.15 tblFleetMix MDV 0.14 0.00 tblFleetMix MH 5.0710e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MH 5.0710e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.00 tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.14 tblFleetMix OBUS 5.5900e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix OBUS 5.5900e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS 9.5400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS 9.5400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix UBUS 2.5400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix UBUS 2.5400e-004 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 4:31 PMPage 2 of 15 Fontana Corporate Center (Existing Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied : : -----------------------------+-----------------------------+------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ 2.0 Emissions Summary tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP 0.00 100.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 0.00 100.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.42 3.74 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 0.00 0.35 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.09 2.97 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 0.00 0.28 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 3.93 2.29 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 0.00 0.22 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 4:31 PMPage 3 of 15 Fontana Corporate Center (Existing Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied : : -----------------------------+-----------------------------+------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•------------------------------------------------------------ 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2022 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2022 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 4:31 PMPage 4 of 15 Fontana Corporate Center (Existing Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ., ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I ., I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ., I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I ., I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I ., I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ., I I I I I I I I I I . I I I I ., I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ., I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 1.7729 1.4000e- 004 0.0150 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0322 0.0322 8.0000e- 005 0.0343 Energy 0.0621 0.5645 0.4741 3.3900e- 003 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 677.3409 677.3409 0.0130 0.0124 681.3660 Mobile 1.0816 3.7433 11.9884 0.0374 3.0488 0.0408 3.0896 0.8219 0.0387 0.8605 3,885.633 0 3,885.633 0 0.1499 0.2737 3,970.942 4 Total 2.9166 4.3078 12.4776 0.0408 3.0488 0.0838 3.1326 0.8219 0.0816 0.9035 4,563.006 1 4,563.006 1 0.1629 0.2861 4,652.342 7 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 1.7729 1.4000e- 004 0.0150 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0322 0.0322 8.0000e- 005 0.0343 Energy 0.0621 0.5645 0.4741 3.3900e- 003 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 677.3409 677.3409 0.0130 0.0124 681.3660 Mobile 1.0816 3.7433 11.9884 0.0374 3.0488 0.0408 3.0896 0.8219 0.0387 0.8605 3,885.633 0 3,885.633 0 0.1499 0.2737 3,970.942 4 Total 2.9166 4.3078 12.4776 0.0408 3.0488 0.0838 3.1326 0.8219 0.0816 0.9035 4,563.006 1 4,563.006 1 0.1629 0.2861 4,652.342 7 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 4:31 PMPage 5 of 15 Fontana Corporate Center (Existing Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I I •• I •• I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------••••••••1-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I •• I •• I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------••••••••1-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ., ., I I I I 3.0 Construction Detail 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 9/1/2022 8/31/2022 5 0 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 0 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Excavators 0 8.00 158 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 247 0.40 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 17.04 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 4:31 PMPage 6 of 15 Fontana Corporate Center (Existing Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! ! ! ! I I I I ■ I I ■ I I ····························1---------------------------~--------------------------------··-····--····-• I I I ■ I I I ----------------------------~--------------------------~---------------·~ -----------~-------------~--------------■ I I I I ■ I I I I 3.2 Demolition - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 4:31 PMPage 7 of 15 Fontana Corporate Center (Existing Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ., ' ' ' I I I I ., I I I I I I I ., I I I I I I I ., I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • • • • • • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • • • • • • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • I I I I 3.2 Demolition - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 4:31 PMPage 8 of 15 Fontana Corporate Center (Existing Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ., ' ' ' I I I I ., I I I I I I I ., I I I I I I I ., I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • • • • • • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • • • • • • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • I I I I ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 1.0816 3.7433 11.9884 0.0374 3.0488 0.0408 3.0896 0.8219 0.0387 0.8605 3,885.633 0 3,885.633 0 0.1499 0.2737 3,970.942 4 Unmitigated 1.0816 3.7433 11.9884 0.0374 3.0488 0.0408 3.0896 0.8219 0.0387 0.8605 3,885.633 0 3,885.633 0 0.1499 0.2737 3,970.942 4 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Manufacturing 149.00 243.41 192.98 747,355 747,355 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 User Defined Industrial 14.00 22.87 18.14 230,895 230,895 Total 163.00 266.27 211.11 978,250 978,250 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Manufacturing 16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 28.00 13.00 92 5 3 Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 User Defined Industrial 40.00 8.40 6.90 100.00 0.00 0.00 100 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 4:31 PMPage 9 of 15 Fontana Corporate Center (Existing Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •• I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •• I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -----------•r--------,--------,--------,--------,--------.--------,--------.--------,--------,--------• -------r--------.--------,--------,-------.... -------., ., ., ., I I I I ~-····································•--------------r-----------t------------=-------------------------1-------------------------- ' I I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ■ ■ • • • • ■ • • • • • ■I-- - - - - - - - - - - --r-----------t ------------I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : I I • • I I I I I I I I I • I I • • • • I I • I I ••• ~••••••••••••••••••••••■p----------~---------~··········T---------r·········r···········•···········•··········•················· • I I ■ I I ■ ■ ■ • I I ■ I I ■ ■ ■ ~ ■ ■ • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ •• • • • • • • • • • • T • • • • • • • • • T • • • • • • • • • • T • • • • • • • • ·r • • • • • • • • ·r • • • • • • • • • • • ~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • r • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Manufacturing 0.578100 0.060000 0.185300 0.149400 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.027200 0.000000 0.000000 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.537785 0.055838 0.172353 0.139003 0.027005 0.007196 0.011392 0.017285 0.000559 0.000254 0.025303 0.000954 0.005071 User Defined Industrial 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.451200 0.120200 0.142900 0.285700 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0621 0.5645 0.4741 3.3900e- 003 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 677.3409 677.3409 0.0130 0.0124 681.3660 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0621 0.5645 0.4741 3.3900e- 003 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 677.3409 677.3409 0.0130 0.0124 681.3660 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 4:31 PMPage 10 of 15 Fontana Corporate Center (Existing Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ------------------------=----------=---------1---------1---------1---------1---------1---------1---------1---------1---------1---------1---------~ -------- ■ ■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ------------------------=----------=----------l----------l----------l----------l----------1----------1----------1----------I----------I----------I---------~-------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • • • • • • • • • • • ar------....,..------....,..------....,..------....,..------....,..------....,..------....,..------....,..------....,..-------• • • • • • • -~------....,..------....,..------....,..-------., • • • • • • • .. .. .. .. 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Manufacturing 5757.4 0.0621 0.5645 0.4741 3.3900e- 003 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 677.3409 677.3409 0.0130 0.0124 681.3660 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 User Defined Industrial 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0621 0.5645 0.4741 3.3900e- 003 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 677.3409 677.3409 0.0130 0.0124 681.3660 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 4:31 PMPage 11 of 15 Fontana Corporate Center (Existing Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I, I 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Manufacturing 5.7574 0.0621 0.5645 0.4741 3.3900e- 003 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 677.3409 677.3409 0.0130 0.0124 681.3660 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 User Defined Industrial 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0621 0.5645 0.4741 3.3900e- 003 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 677.3409 677.3409 0.0130 0.0124 681.3660 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 4:31 PMPage 12 of 15 Fontana Corporate Center (Existing Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I, I ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 1.7729 1.4000e- 004 0.0150 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0322 0.0322 8.0000e- 005 0.0343 Unmitigated 1.7729 1.4000e- 004 0.0150 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0322 0.0322 8.0000e- 005 0.0343 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.2216 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 1.5499 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.3900e- 003 1.4000e- 004 0.0150 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0322 0.0322 8.0000e- 005 0.0343 Total 1.7729 1.4000e- 004 0.0150 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0322 0.0322 8.0000e- 005 0.0343 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 4:31 PMPage 13 of 15 Fontana Corporate Center (Existing Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I . -----. ----~-------,.-------.--------.--------,.-------.--------.--------.--------.--------,.-------• -------,-------.... -------.--------,.------.... ---. --. . , ., ., ., ' ' ' ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••--------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••--------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' ' 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.2216 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 1.5499 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.3900e- 003 1.4000e- 004 0.0150 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0322 0.0322 8.0000e- 005 0.0343 Total 1.7729 1.4000e- 004 0.0150 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0322 0.0322 8.0000e- 005 0.0343 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 4:31 PMPage 14 of 15 Fontana Corporate Center (Existing Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I 11.0 Vegetation 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 8.0 Waste Detail 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 4:31 PMPage 15 of 15 Fontana Corporate Center (Existing Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Fontana Corporate Center (Existing Operations) San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter Project Characteristics - Land Use - Construction Phase - Operations run only Off-road Equipment - Operations run only Vehicle Trips - Trip characteristics based on information provided in the Traffic analysis Fleet Mix - Passenger Car Mix estimated based on the CalEEMod default fleet mix and the ratio of the vehicle classes (LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV, & MCY). Truck Mix based on information in the Traffic analysis 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Manufacturing 65.00 1000sqft 1.49 65,000.00 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 17.04 Acre 17.04 742,262.40 0 User Defined Industrial 65.00 User Defined Unit 0.00 0.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 10 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 32 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2023Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 390.98 0.033CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.004N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 0.00 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 9/28/2022 8/31/2022 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 4:30 PMPage 1 of 15 Fontana Corporate Center (Existing Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I 1 I • • I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -;. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --=-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -i ---------------• • I I I ■ • I I I ------------------------------1------------------------------~------------------------------wi---------------~-----------------~--------------- 1-----------------------------!-----------------------------l---------------------➔--------------------------I tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.00 tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.29 tblFleetMix LDA 0.54 0.58 tblFleetMix LDA 0.54 0.00 tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.06 tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.00 tblFleetMix LDT2 0.17 0.19 tblFleetMix LDT2 0.17 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD1 0.03 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD1 0.03 0.45 tblFleetMix LHD2 7.1960e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD2 7.1960e-003 0.12 tblFleetMix MCY 0.03 0.03 tblFleetMix MCY 0.03 0.00 tblFleetMix MDV 0.14 0.15 tblFleetMix MDV 0.14 0.00 tblFleetMix MH 5.0710e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MH 5.0710e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.00 tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.14 tblFleetMix OBUS 5.5900e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix OBUS 5.5900e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS 9.5400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS 9.5400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix UBUS 2.5400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix UBUS 2.5400e-004 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 4:30 PMPage 2 of 15 Fontana Corporate Center (Existing Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied : : -----------------------------+-----------------------------+------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ 2.0 Emissions Summary tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP 0.00 100.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 0.00 100.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.42 3.74 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 0.00 0.35 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.09 2.97 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 0.00 0.28 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 3.93 2.29 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 0.00 0.22 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 4:30 PMPage 3 of 15 Fontana Corporate Center (Existing Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied : : -----------------------------+-----------------------------+------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•------------------------------------------------------------ 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2022 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2022 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 4:30 PMPage 4 of 15 Fontana Corporate Center (Existing Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ., ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I ., I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ., I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I ., I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I ., I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ., I I I I I I I I I I . I I I I ., I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ., I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 1.7729 1.4000e- 004 0.0150 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0322 0.0322 8.0000e- 005 0.0343 Energy 0.0621 0.5645 0.4741 3.3900e- 003 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 677.3409 677.3409 0.0130 0.0124 681.3660 Mobile 0.9673 3.9439 10.6556 0.0356 3.0488 0.0408 3.0897 0.8219 0.0387 0.8606 3,698.764 3 3,698.764 3 0.1515 0.2769 3,785.079 1 Total 2.8023 4.5085 11.1447 0.0390 3.0488 0.0838 3.1326 0.8219 0.0816 0.9035 4,376.137 4 4,376.137 4 0.1646 0.2894 4,466.479 3 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 1.7729 1.4000e- 004 0.0150 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0322 0.0322 8.0000e- 005 0.0343 Energy 0.0621 0.5645 0.4741 3.3900e- 003 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 677.3409 677.3409 0.0130 0.0124 681.3660 Mobile 0.9673 3.9439 10.6556 0.0356 3.0488 0.0408 3.0897 0.8219 0.0387 0.8606 3,698.764 3 3,698.764 3 0.1515 0.2769 3,785.079 1 Total 2.8023 4.5085 11.1447 0.0390 3.0488 0.0838 3.1326 0.8219 0.0816 0.9035 4,376.137 4 4,376.137 4 0.1646 0.2894 4,466.479 3 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 4:30 PMPage 5 of 15 Fontana Corporate Center (Existing Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I I •• I •• I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------••••••••1-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I •• I •• I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------••••••••1-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ., ., I I I I 3.0 Construction Detail 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 9/1/2022 8/31/2022 5 0 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 0 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Excavators 0 8.00 158 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 247 0.40 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 17.04 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 4:30 PMPage 6 of 15 Fontana Corporate Center (Existing Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! ! ! ! I I I I ■ I I ■ I I ····························1---------------------------~--------------------------------··-····--····-• I I I ■ I I I ----------------------------~--------------------------~---------------·~ -----------~-------------~--------------■ I I I I ■ I I I I 3.2 Demolition - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 4:30 PMPage 7 of 15 Fontana Corporate Center (Existing Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ., ' ' ' I I I I ., I I I I I I I ., I I I I I I I ., I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • • • • • • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • • • • • • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • I I I I 3.2 Demolition - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 4:30 PMPage 8 of 15 Fontana Corporate Center (Existing Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ., ' ' ' I I I I ., I I I I I I I ., I I I I I I I ., I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • • • • • • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • • • • • • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • I I I I ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.9673 3.9439 10.6556 0.0356 3.0488 0.0408 3.0897 0.8219 0.0387 0.8606 3,698.764 3 3,698.764 3 0.1515 0.2769 3,785.079 1 Unmitigated 0.9673 3.9439 10.6556 0.0356 3.0488 0.0408 3.0897 0.8219 0.0387 0.8606 3,698.764 3 3,698.764 3 0.1515 0.2769 3,785.079 1 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Manufacturing 149.00 243.41 192.98 747,355 747,355 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 User Defined Industrial 14.00 22.87 18.14 230,895 230,895 Total 163.00 266.27 211.11 978,250 978,250 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Manufacturing 16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 28.00 13.00 92 5 3 Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 User Defined Industrial 40.00 8.40 6.90 100.00 0.00 0.00 100 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 4:30 PMPage 9 of 15 Fontana Corporate Center (Existing Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •• I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •• I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -----------•r--------,--------,--------,--------,--------.--------,--------.--------,--------,--------• -------r--------.--------,--------,-------.... -------., ., ., ., I I I I ~-····································•--------------r-----------t------------=-------------------------1-------------------------- ' I I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ■ ■ • • • • ■ • • • • • ■I-- - - - - - - - - - - --r-----------t ------------I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : I I • • I I I I I I I I I • I I • • • • I I • I I ••• ~••••••••••••••••••••••■p----------~---------~··········T---------r·········r···········•···········•··········•················· • I I ■ I I ■ ■ ■ • I I ■ I I ■ ■ ■ ~ ■ ■ • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ •• • • • • • • • • • • T • • • • • • • • • T • • • • • • • • • • T • • • • • • • • ·r • • • • • • • • ·r • • • • • • • • • • • ~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • r • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Manufacturing 0.578100 0.060000 0.185300 0.149400 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.027200 0.000000 0.000000 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.537785 0.055838 0.172353 0.139003 0.027005 0.007196 0.011392 0.017285 0.000559 0.000254 0.025303 0.000954 0.005071 User Defined Industrial 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.451200 0.120200 0.142900 0.285700 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0621 0.5645 0.4741 3.3900e- 003 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 677.3409 677.3409 0.0130 0.0124 681.3660 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0621 0.5645 0.4741 3.3900e- 003 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 677.3409 677.3409 0.0130 0.0124 681.3660 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 4:30 PMPage 10 of 15 Fontana Corporate Center (Existing Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ------------------------=----------=---------1---------1---------1---------1---------1---------1---------1---------1---------1---------1---------~ -------- ■ ■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ------------------------=----------=----------l----------l----------l----------l----------1----------1----------1----------I----------I----------I---------~-------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • • • • • • • • • • • ar------....,..------....,..------....,..------....,..------....,..------....,..------....,..------....,..------....,..-------• • • • • • • -~------....,..------....,..------....,..-------., • • • • • • • .. .. .. .. 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Manufacturing 5757.4 0.0621 0.5645 0.4741 3.3900e- 003 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 677.3409 677.3409 0.0130 0.0124 681.3660 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 User Defined Industrial 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0621 0.5645 0.4741 3.3900e- 003 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 677.3409 677.3409 0.0130 0.0124 681.3660 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 4:30 PMPage 11 of 15 Fontana Corporate Center (Existing Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I, I 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Manufacturing 5.7574 0.0621 0.5645 0.4741 3.3900e- 003 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 677.3409 677.3409 0.0130 0.0124 681.3660 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 User Defined Industrial 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0621 0.5645 0.4741 3.3900e- 003 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 677.3409 677.3409 0.0130 0.0124 681.3660 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 4:30 PMPage 12 of 15 Fontana Corporate Center (Existing Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I, I ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 1.7729 1.4000e- 004 0.0150 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0322 0.0322 8.0000e- 005 0.0343 Unmitigated 1.7729 1.4000e- 004 0.0150 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0322 0.0322 8.0000e- 005 0.0343 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.2216 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 1.5499 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.3900e- 003 1.4000e- 004 0.0150 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0322 0.0322 8.0000e- 005 0.0343 Total 1.7729 1.4000e- 004 0.0150 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0322 0.0322 8.0000e- 005 0.0343 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 4:30 PMPage 13 of 15 Fontana Corporate Center (Existing Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I . -----. ----~-------,.-------.--------.--------,.-------.--------.--------.--------.--------,.-------• -------,-------.... -------.--------,.------.... ---. --. . , ., ., ., ' ' ' ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••--------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••--------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' ' 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.2216 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 1.5499 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.3900e- 003 1.4000e- 004 0.0150 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0322 0.0322 8.0000e- 005 0.0343 Total 1.7729 1.4000e- 004 0.0150 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0322 0.0322 8.0000e- 005 0.0343 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 4:30 PMPage 14 of 15 Fontana Corporate Center (Existing Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I 11.0 Vegetation 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 8.0 Waste Detail 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 4:30 PMPage 15 of 15 Fontana Corporate Center (Existing Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report This page intentionally left blank Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report APPENDIX 3.4: CALEEMOD PROJECT OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer Project Characteristics - Land Use - Total Project Area is 18.53 acres Construction Phase - Operations run only Off-road Equipment - Operations run only Vehicle Trips - Trip characteristics based on information provided in the Traffic analysis Fleet Mix - Passenger Car Mix estimated based on the CalEEMod default fleet mix and the ratio of the vehicle classes (LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV, & MCY). Truck Mix based on information in the Traffic analysis Operational Off-Road Equipment - Based on SCAQMD High Cube Warehouse Truck Trip Study White Paper Summary of Busniess Survey Results (2014) 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 355.37 1000sqft 8.16 355,370.00 0 Parking Lot 387.00 Space 2.00 87,341.00 0 City Park 1.96 Acre 1.96 85,590.00 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 279.07 1000sqft 6.41 279,068.00 0 User Defined Industrial 355.37 User Defined Unit 0.00 0.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 10 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 32 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2023Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 390.98 0.033CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.004N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:10 PMPage 1 of 16 Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I 1 I • I I I ------------------------------1-------------------------------~--------------l------------------i---------------• I I I • I I I ------------------------------1-------------------------------~--------------I------------------~---------------• I I I • I I I ------------------------------1-------------------------------~--------------I------------------~---------------• I I I • I I I ------------------------------~------------------------------wi---------------~-----------------~--------------- Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 0.00 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 9/28/2022 8/31/2022 tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.00 tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.62 tblFleetMix LDA 0.54 0.58 tblFleetMix LDA 0.54 0.00 tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.06 tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.00 tblFleetMix LDT2 0.17 0.19 tblFleetMix LDT2 0.17 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD1 0.03 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD1 0.03 0.13 tblFleetMix LHD2 7.1960e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD2 7.1960e-003 0.03 tblFleetMix MCY 0.03 0.03 tblFleetMix MCY 0.03 0.00 tblFleetMix MDV 0.14 0.15 tblFleetMix MDV 0.14 0.00 tblFleetMix MH 5.0710e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MH 5.0710e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.00 tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.21 tblFleetMix OBUS 5.5900e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix OBUS 5.5900e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS 9.5400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS 9.5400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix UBUS 2.5400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix UBUS 2.5400e-004 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:10 PMPage 2 of 16 Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I . . ---------------------------••y••-----------------------------------------------------------. . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------. . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------. . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------. . ---------------------------••y••-----------------------------------------------------------. . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------. . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------. . -----------•----•------------T----------------•----•---------------------------------------. . -----------------------------T-------------------------------------------------------------. . -----------------------------T-------------------------------------------------------------. . -----------------------------T-------------------------------------------------------------. . -----------•----•------------T----------------•----•---------------------------------------. . -----------------------------T-------------------------------------------------------------. . -----------------------------T-------------------------------------------------------------. . -----------------------------T-------------------------------------------------------------. . -----------•----•------------T----------------•----•---------------------------------------. . -----------------------------T-------------------------------------------------------------. . -----------------------------T-------------------------------------------------------------. . -----------------------------T-------------------------------------------------------------. . -----------•----•------------T----------------•----•---------------------------------------. . -----------------------------T-------------------------------------------------------------. . -----------------------------T-------------------------------------------------------------. . -----------------------------T-------------------------------------------------------------. . -----------•----•------------T----------------•----•---------------------------------------. . -----------------------------T-------------------------------------------------------------. . -----------------------------T-------------------------------------------------------------. . -----------------------------T------------------------------.------------------------------ tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 154,800.00 87,341.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 85,377.60 85,590.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 3.48 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperDaysPerYear 260.00 365.00 tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperFuelType Diesel CNG tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperHorsePower 97.00 200.00 tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperHoursPerDay 8.00 4.00 tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperOffRoadEquipmentNumber 0.00 2.00 tblVehicleTrips CC_TTP 48.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TTP 19.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP 33.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP 0.00 100.00 tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 28.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 6.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 66.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 0.00 100.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.96 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.74 0.11 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 0.00 0.04 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.19 0.00 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.74 0.04 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 0.00 0.02 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 0.78 0.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.74 1.27 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 0.00 0.48 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:10 PMPage 3 of 16 Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied : : -----------------------------+-----------------------------+------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2022 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2022 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:10 PMPage 4 of 16 Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ,. ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ,. ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ,. ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ,. ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ,. ' ' ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ,. ' ' ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ,. ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ,. ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 8.1140 1.2800e- 003 0.1408 1.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 0.3018 0.3018 7.9000e- 004 0.3215 Energy 0.0211 0.1919 0.1612 1.1500e- 003 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 230.2317 230.2317 4.4100e- 003 4.2200e- 003 231.5998 Mobile 2.3647 28.5957 27.0256 0.1968 10.1068 0.3150 10.4217 2.7767 0.3006 3.0773 21,001.15 81 21,001.15 81 0.7611 2.6206 21,801.11 74 Offroad 0.2207 2.0721 1.4984 6.3300e- 003 0.0752 0.0752 0.0692 0.0692 0.0000 613.0902 613.0902 0.1983 618.0473 Total 10.7204 30.8610 28.8259 0.2043 10.1068 0.4052 10.5120 2.7767 0.3848 3.1616 0.0000 21,844.78 17 21,844.78 17 0.9646 2.6248 22,651.08 61 Unmitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:10 PMPage 5 of 16 Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 8.1140 1.2800e- 003 0.1408 1.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 0.3018 0.3018 7.9000e- 004 0.3215 Energy 0.0211 0.1919 0.1612 1.1500e- 003 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 230.2317 230.2317 4.4100e- 003 4.2200e- 003 231.5998 Mobile 2.3647 28.5957 27.0256 0.1968 10.1068 0.3150 10.4217 2.7767 0.3006 3.0773 21,001.15 81 21,001.15 81 0.7611 2.6206 21,801.11 74 Offroad 0.2207 2.0721 1.4984 6.3300e- 003 0.0752 0.0752 0.0692 0.0692 0.0000 613.0902 613.0902 0.1983 618.0473 Total 10.7204 30.8610 28.8259 0.2043 10.1068 0.4052 10.5120 2.7767 0.3848 3.1616 0.0000 21,844.78 17 21,844.78 17 0.9646 2.6248 22,651.08 61 Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 9/1/2022 8/31/2022 5 0 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:10 PMPage 6 of 16 Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! ! ! 3.2 Demolition - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 0 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Excavators 0 8.00 158 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 247 0.40 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Paving: 8.41 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:10 PMPage 7 of 16 Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I ····························=---------------------------~-----------------------------t---------+··-····--····-1 I I I ----------------------------~--------------------------~---------------·~ -----------~-------------~-------------- -I -I -I -I I I I I . . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I & I I I I I I & . I I I I I & . I I I I I & . I I I I I I I I I I 3.2 Demolition - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:10 PMPage 8 of 16 Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I 3.2 Demolition - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:10 PMPage 9 of 16 Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I I ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 2.3647 28.5957 27.0256 0.1968 10.1068 0.3150 10.4217 2.7767 0.3006 3.0773 21,001.15 81 21,001.15 81 0.7611 2.6206 21,801.11 74 Unmitigated 2.3647 28.5957 27.0256 0.1968 10.1068 0.3150 10.4217 2.7767 0.3006 3.0773 21,001.15 81 21,001.15 81 0.7611 2.6206 21,801.11 74 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 452.00 38.74 15.49 1,416,861 1,416,861 User Defined Industrial 170.01 14.57 5.83 1,810,522 1,810,522 Total 622.00 53.31 21.32 3,227,383 3,227,383 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5 3 User Defined Industrial 40.00 8.40 6.90 100.00 0.00 0.00 100 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:10 PMPage 10 of 16 Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I --------. --.,..-------,.-------.--------.--------.--------.--------,.-------.--------.--------.--------• -. -----,--------.--------,--------.-------.... -----. -., ., ., ., I I I I ~•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••l--------------~-----------i·········••4••······················1·························· • I I ■ ■ ~•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••l--------------~-----------t·········••4------------------------1-------------------------- • I I ■ ■ ~•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••l--------------~-----------t··········•4------------------------I-------------------------- • I I --~-------------------------------------1--------------~-----------t-----------4------------------------I-------------------------- : I I -- I I I I I I I I -I I ---• I I ■ I I ---~-----------------------r----------r---------T-•-----•--T---------r----••-••r-----•-•---r•-------------•-----•-r•-----•-•---••--- • I I ■ I I --- -I I --------------------------r----------r---------T-•••••••••T---------r•••••••••r•••••••••••r•••••••••••r••••••••••r••••••••••••••••• • I I -I I ---• I I ■ I I -■ -~-----------------------r----------r---------T••••••••••T---------r•••••••••r•••••••••••r••••••••••••••••••••••r••••••••••••••••• • I I -I I --- • I I -I I ---~ ----------------• ----• _., - - - -• - -• - -T - -• - -• - -• T • • • • • • • • • • T -• - -• - -• ·r • - -• - -• -·r • • • • • • • • • • • r • • • • -• • • • -• r -• • • • • • • • • r • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH City Park 0.537785 0.055838 0.172353 0.139003 0.027005 0.007196 0.011392 0.017285 0.000559 0.000254 0.025303 0.000954 0.005071 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.537785 0.055838 0.172353 0.139003 0.027005 0.007196 0.011392 0.017285 0.000559 0.000254 0.025303 0.000954 0.005071 Parking Lot 0.537785 0.055838 0.172353 0.139003 0.027005 0.007196 0.011392 0.017285 0.000559 0.000254 0.025303 0.000954 0.005071 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.578100 0.060000 0.185300 0.149400 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.027200 0.000000 0.000000 User Defined Industrial 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.130000 0.034700 0.211800 0.623500 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0211 0.1919 0.1612 1.1500e- 003 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 230.2317 230.2317 4.4100e- 003 4.2200e- 003 231.5998 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0211 0.1919 0.1612 1.1500e- 003 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 230.2317 230.2317 4.4100e- 003 4.2200e- 003 231.5998 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:10 PMPage 11 of 16 Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied .. .. -------.,_ ______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ ~_ ------., _______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ ..,.. -----------I I I I I f I I I I I I I I I I■ I I •• ' T ········r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------•········ I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••• 1-- - - --- - -,- --- - - --➔-- - - ----➔---- - - --➔-- - -----➔----- ---➔-- - --- --➔---- - - ---,- - - --- --➔---- - - ---,- - - --- ---t •••••••• I I I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I I I ■ • • • • • • • • -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --t • • • • • • • • I I I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I I I ■ • • • • • • • • -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --t • • • • • • • • 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 1956.97 0.0211 0.1919 0.1612 1.1500e- 003 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 230.2317 230.2317 4.4100e- 003 4.2200e- 003 231.5998 User Defined Industrial 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0211 0.1919 0.1612 1.1500e- 003 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 230.2317 230.2317 4.4100e- 003 4.2200e- 003 231.5998 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:10 PMPage 12 of 16 Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -,-------..-------T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T------,--------t - - - - - --,-------T ______ T ______ T ______ "T - - - - - - - 1 •• I I I I I I I I I • 1 I I I I "' I I I I I I I I I I I I I "' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -----------~------•-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------+-------~-------1-------1-------1-------1-------•-------1, I 1, I I, I I, I 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 1.95697 0.0211 0.1919 0.1612 1.1500e- 003 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 230.2317 230.2317 4.4100e- 003 4.2200e- 003 231.5998 User Defined Industrial 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0211 0.1919 0.1612 1.1500e- 003 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 230.2317 230.2317 4.4100e- 003 4.2200e- 003 231.5998 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:10 PMPage 13 of 16 Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -,-------..-------T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T------,--------t - - - - - --,-------T ______ T ______ T ______ "T - - - - - - - 1 •• I I I I I I I I I • 1 I I I I "' I I I I I I I I I I I I I "' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -----------~------•-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------+-------~-------1-------1-------1-------1-------•-------1, I 1, I I, I I, I ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 8.1140 1.2800e- 003 0.1408 1.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 0.3018 0.3018 7.9000e- 004 0.3215 Unmitigated 8.1140 1.2800e- 003 0.1408 1.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 0.3018 0.3018 7.9000e- 004 0.3215 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.9305 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 7.1705 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0130 1.2800e- 003 0.1408 1.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 0.3018 0.3018 7.9000e- 004 0.3215 Total 8.1140 1.2800e- 003 0.1408 1.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 0.3018 0.3018 7.9000e- 004 0.3215 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:10 PMPage 14 of 16 Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I . -----. ----~-------,.-------.--------.--------,.-------.--------.--------.--------.--------,.-------• -------,-------.... -------.--------,.------.... ---. --. . , ., ., ., ' ' ' ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••--------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••--------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' ' 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.9305 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 7.1705 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0130 1.2800e- 003 0.1408 1.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 0.3018 0.3018 7.9000e- 004 0.3215 Total 8.1140 1.2800e- 003 0.1408 1.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 0.3018 0.3018 7.9000e- 004 0.3215 Mitigated 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 8.0 Waste Detail 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 4.00 365 200 0.37 CNG CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:10 PMPage 15 of 16 Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I 11.0 Vegetation ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Equipment Type lb/day lb/day Tractors/Loaders/ Backhoes 0.2207 2.0721 1.4984 6.3300e- 003 0.0752 0.0752 0.0692 0.0692 0.0000 613.0902 613.0902 0.1983 618.0473 Total 0.2207 2.0721 1.4984 6.3300e- 003 0.0752 0.0752 0.0692 0.0692 0.0000 613.0902 613.0902 0.1983 618.0473 UnMitigated/Mitigated 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:10 PMPage 16 of 16 Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ., I I I I I I I I I & ' I I I I ., I I I I I I I I I & ' I I I I ., I I I I I I I I I & ' I I I I ., I I I I I I I I I & ' I I I I Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter Project Characteristics - Land Use - Total Project Area is 18.53 acres Construction Phase - Operations run only Off-road Equipment - Operations run only Vehicle Trips - Trip characteristics based on information provided in the Traffic analysis Fleet Mix - Passenger Car Mix estimated based on the CalEEMod default fleet mix and the ratio of the vehicle classes (LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV, & MCY). Truck Mix based on information in the Traffic analysis Operational Off-Road Equipment - Based on SCAQMD High Cube Warehouse Truck Trip Study White Paper Summary of Busniess Survey Results (2014) 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 355.37 1000sqft 8.16 355,370.00 0 Parking Lot 387.00 Space 2.00 87,341.00 0 City Park 1.96 Acre 1.96 85,590.00 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 279.07 1000sqft 6.41 279,068.00 0 User Defined Industrial 355.37 User Defined Unit 0.00 0.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 10 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 32 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2023Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 390.98 0.033CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.004N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:09 PMPage 1 of 16 Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I 1 I • I I I ------------------------------1-------------------------------~--------------l------------------i---------------• I I I • I I I ------------------------------1-------------------------------~--------------I------------------~---------------• I I I • I I I ------------------------------1-------------------------------~--------------I------------------~---------------• I I I • I I I ------------------------------~------------------------------wi---------------~-----------------~--------------- Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 0.00 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 9/28/2022 8/31/2022 tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.00 tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.62 tblFleetMix LDA 0.54 0.58 tblFleetMix LDA 0.54 0.00 tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.06 tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.00 tblFleetMix LDT2 0.17 0.19 tblFleetMix LDT2 0.17 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD1 0.03 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD1 0.03 0.13 tblFleetMix LHD2 7.1960e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD2 7.1960e-003 0.03 tblFleetMix MCY 0.03 0.03 tblFleetMix MCY 0.03 0.00 tblFleetMix MDV 0.14 0.15 tblFleetMix MDV 0.14 0.00 tblFleetMix MH 5.0710e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MH 5.0710e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.00 tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.21 tblFleetMix OBUS 5.5900e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix OBUS 5.5900e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS 9.5400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS 9.5400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix UBUS 2.5400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix UBUS 2.5400e-004 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:09 PMPage 2 of 16 Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I . . ---------------------------••y••-----------------------------------------------------------. . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------. . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------. . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------. . ---------------------------••y••-----------------------------------------------------------. . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------. . ---------------------------••y•------------------------------------------------------------. . -----------•----•------------T----------------•----•---------------------------------------. . -----------------------------T-------------------------------------------------------------. . -----------------------------T-------------------------------------------------------------. . -----------------------------T-------------------------------------------------------------. . -----------•----•------------T----------------•----•---------------------------------------. . -----------------------------T-------------------------------------------------------------. . -----------------------------T-------------------------------------------------------------. . -----------------------------T-------------------------------------------------------------. . -----------•----•------------T----------------•----•---------------------------------------. . -----------------------------T-------------------------------------------------------------. . -----------------------------T-------------------------------------------------------------. . -----------------------------T-------------------------------------------------------------. . -----------•----•------------T----------------•----•---------------------------------------. . -----------------------------T-------------------------------------------------------------. . -----------------------------T-------------------------------------------------------------. . -----------------------------T-------------------------------------------------------------. . -----------•----•------------T----------------•----•---------------------------------------. . -----------------------------T-------------------------------------------------------------. . -----------------------------T-------------------------------------------------------------. . -----------------------------T------------------------------.------------------------------ tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 154,800.00 87,341.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 85,377.60 85,590.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 3.48 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperDaysPerYear 260.00 365.00 tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperFuelType Diesel CNG tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperHorsePower 97.00 200.00 tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperHoursPerDay 8.00 4.00 tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment OperOffRoadEquipmentNumber 0.00 2.00 tblVehicleTrips CC_TTP 48.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TTP 19.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP 33.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP 0.00 100.00 tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 28.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 6.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 66.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 0.00 100.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.96 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.74 0.11 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 0.00 0.04 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.19 0.00 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.74 0.04 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 0.00 0.02 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 0.78 0.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.74 1.27 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 0.00 0.48 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:09 PMPage 3 of 16 Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied : : -----------------------------+-----------------------------+------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■ -----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2022 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2022 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:09 PMPage 4 of 16 Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ,. ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ,. ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ,. ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ,. ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ,. ' ' ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ,. ' ' ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ,. ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ,. ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 8.1140 1.2800e- 003 0.1408 1.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 0.3018 0.3018 7.9000e- 004 0.3215 Energy 0.0211 0.1919 0.1612 1.1500e- 003 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 230.2317 230.2317 4.4100e- 003 4.2200e- 003 231.5998 Mobile 2.1355 30.0520 24.6952 0.1936 10.1068 0.3152 10.4219 2.7767 0.3008 3.0775 20,674.05 05 20,674.05 05 0.7634 2.6285 21,476.42 03 Offroad 0.2207 2.0721 1.4984 6.3300e- 003 0.0752 0.0752 0.0692 0.0692 0.0000 613.0902 613.0902 0.1983 618.0473 Total 10.4913 32.3172 26.4955 0.2011 10.1068 0.4054 10.5122 2.7767 0.3850 3.1618 0.0000 21,517.67 41 21,517.67 41 0.9669 2.6327 22,326.38 90 Unmitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:09 PMPage 5 of 16 Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 8.1140 1.2800e- 003 0.1408 1.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 0.3018 0.3018 7.9000e- 004 0.3215 Energy 0.0211 0.1919 0.1612 1.1500e- 003 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 230.2317 230.2317 4.4100e- 003 4.2200e- 003 231.5998 Mobile 2.1355 30.0520 24.6952 0.1936 10.1068 0.3152 10.4219 2.7767 0.3008 3.0775 20,674.05 05 20,674.05 05 0.7634 2.6285 21,476.42 03 Offroad 0.2207 2.0721 1.4984 6.3300e- 003 0.0752 0.0752 0.0692 0.0692 0.0000 613.0902 613.0902 0.1983 618.0473 Total 10.4913 32.3172 26.4955 0.2011 10.1068 0.4054 10.5122 2.7767 0.3850 3.1618 0.0000 21,517.67 41 21,517.67 41 0.9669 2.6327 22,326.38 90 Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 9/1/2022 8/31/2022 5 0 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:09 PMPage 6 of 16 Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! ! ! 3.2 Demolition - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 0 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Excavators 0 8.00 158 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 247 0.40 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Paving: 8.41 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:09 PMPage 7 of 16 Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I ····························=---------------------------~-----------------------------t---------+··-····--····-1 I I I ----------------------------~--------------------------~---------------·~ -----------~-------------~-------------- -I -I -I -I I I I I . . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I & I I I I I I & . I I I I I & . I I I I I & . I I I I I I I I I I 3.2 Demolition - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:09 PMPage 8 of 16 Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I 3.2 Demolition - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:09 PMPage 9 of 16 Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - --,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I I I ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 2.1355 30.0520 24.6952 0.1936 10.1068 0.3152 10.4219 2.7767 0.3008 3.0775 20,674.05 05 20,674.05 05 0.7634 2.6285 21,476.42 03 Unmitigated 2.1355 30.0520 24.6952 0.1936 10.1068 0.3152 10.4219 2.7767 0.3008 3.0775 20,674.05 05 20,674.05 05 0.7634 2.6285 21,476.42 03 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 452.00 38.74 15.49 1,416,861 1,416,861 User Defined Industrial 170.01 14.57 5.83 1,810,522 1,810,522 Total 622.00 53.31 21.32 3,227,383 3,227,383 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5 3 User Defined Industrial 40.00 8.40 6.90 100.00 0.00 0.00 100 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:09 PMPage 10 of 16 Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I --------. --.,..-------,.-------.--------.--------.--------.--------,.-------.--------.--------.--------• -. -----,--------.--------,--------.-------.... -----. -., ., ., ., I I I I ~•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••l--------------~-----------i·········••4••······················1·························· • I I ■ ■ ~•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••l--------------~-----------t·········••4------------------------1-------------------------- • I I ■ ■ ~•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••l--------------~-----------t··········•4------------------------I-------------------------- • I I --~-------------------------------------1--------------~-----------t-----------4------------------------I-------------------------- : I I -- I I I I I I I I -I I ---• I I ■ I I ---~-----------------------r----------r---------T-•-----•--T---------r----••-••r-----•-•---r•-------------•-----•-r•-----•-•---••--- • I I ■ I I --- -I I --------------------------r----------r---------T-•••••••••T---------r•••••••••r•••••••••••r•••••••••••r••••••••••r••••••••••••••••• • I I -I I ---• I I ■ I I -■ -~-----------------------r----------r---------T••••••••••T---------r•••••••••r•••••••••••r••••••••••••••••••••••r••••••••••••••••• • I I -I I --- • I I -I I ---~ ----------------• ----• _., - - - -• - -• - -T - -• - -• - -• T • • • • • • • • • • T -• - -• - -• ·r • - -• - -• -·r • • • • • • • • • • • r • • • • -• • • • -• r -• • • • • • • • • r • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH City Park 0.537785 0.055838 0.172353 0.139003 0.027005 0.007196 0.011392 0.017285 0.000559 0.000254 0.025303 0.000954 0.005071 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.537785 0.055838 0.172353 0.139003 0.027005 0.007196 0.011392 0.017285 0.000559 0.000254 0.025303 0.000954 0.005071 Parking Lot 0.537785 0.055838 0.172353 0.139003 0.027005 0.007196 0.011392 0.017285 0.000559 0.000254 0.025303 0.000954 0.005071 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.578100 0.060000 0.185300 0.149400 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.027200 0.000000 0.000000 User Defined Industrial 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.130000 0.034700 0.211800 0.623500 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0211 0.1919 0.1612 1.1500e- 003 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 230.2317 230.2317 4.4100e- 003 4.2200e- 003 231.5998 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0211 0.1919 0.1612 1.1500e- 003 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 230.2317 230.2317 4.4100e- 003 4.2200e- 003 231.5998 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:09 PMPage 11 of 16 Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied .. .. -------.,_ ______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ ~_ ------., _______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ _,_ ______ ..,.. -----------I I I I I f I I I I I I I I I I■ I I •• ' T ········r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------r--------•········ I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••• 1-- - - --- - -,- --- - - --➔-- - - ----➔---- - - --➔-- - -----➔----- ---➔-- - --- --➔---- - - ---,- - - --- --➔---- - - ---,- - - --- ---t •••••••• I I I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I I I ■ • • • • • • • • -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --t • • • • • • • • I I I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I I I I I I I I ■ • • • • • • • • -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - --t • • • • • • • • 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 1956.97 0.0211 0.1919 0.1612 1.1500e- 003 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 230.2317 230.2317 4.4100e- 003 4.2200e- 003 231.5998 User Defined Industrial 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0211 0.1919 0.1612 1.1500e- 003 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 230.2317 230.2317 4.4100e- 003 4.2200e- 003 231.5998 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:09 PMPage 12 of 16 Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -,-------..-------T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T------,--------t - - - - - --,-------T ______ T ______ T ______ "T - - - - - - - 1 •• I I I I I I I I I • 1 I I I I "' I I I I I I I I I I I I I "' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -----------~------•-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------+-------~-------1-------1-------1-------1-------•-------1, I 1, I I, I I, I 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 1.95697 0.0211 0.1919 0.1612 1.1500e- 003 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 230.2317 230.2317 4.4100e- 003 4.2200e- 003 231.5998 User Defined Industrial 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0211 0.1919 0.1612 1.1500e- 003 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 230.2317 230.2317 4.4100e- 003 4.2200e- 003 231.5998 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:09 PMPage 13 of 16 Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - -,-------..-------T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T ______ T------,--------t - - - - - --,-------T ______ T ______ T ______ "T - - - - - - - 1 •• I I I I I I I I I • 1 I I I I "' I I I I I I I I I I I I I "' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -----------~------•-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------1-------+-------~-------1-------1-------1-------1-------•-------1, I 1, I I, I I, I ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 8.1140 1.2800e- 003 0.1408 1.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 0.3018 0.3018 7.9000e- 004 0.3215 Unmitigated 8.1140 1.2800e- 003 0.1408 1.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 0.3018 0.3018 7.9000e- 004 0.3215 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.9305 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 7.1705 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0130 1.2800e- 003 0.1408 1.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 0.3018 0.3018 7.9000e- 004 0.3215 Total 8.1140 1.2800e- 003 0.1408 1.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 0.3018 0.3018 7.9000e- 004 0.3215 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:09 PMPage 14 of 16 Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I . -----. ----~-------,.-------.--------.--------,.-------.--------.--------.--------.--------,.-------• -------,-------.... -------.--------,.------.... ---. --. . , ., ., ., ' ' ' ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••--------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••--------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' ' 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.9305 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 7.1705 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0130 1.2800e- 003 0.1408 1.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 0.3018 0.3018 7.9000e- 004 0.3215 Total 8.1140 1.2800e- 003 0.1408 1.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 0.3018 0.3018 7.9000e- 004 0.3215 Mitigated 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 8.0 Waste Detail 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 4.00 365 200 0.37 CNG CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:09 PMPage 15 of 16 Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I 11.0 Vegetation ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Equipment Type lb/day lb/day Tractors/Loaders/ Backhoes 0.2207 2.0721 1.4984 6.3300e- 003 0.0752 0.0752 0.0692 0.0692 0.0000 613.0902 613.0902 0.1983 618.0473 Total 0.2207 2.0721 1.4984 6.3300e- 003 0.0752 0.0752 0.0692 0.0692 0.0000 613.0902 613.0902 0.1983 618.0473 UnMitigated/Mitigated 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/21/2021 2:09 PMPage 16 of 16 Fontana Corporate Center (Operations) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ., I I I I I I I I I & ' I I I I ., I I I I I I I I I & ' I I I I ., I I I I I I I I I & ' I I I I ., I I I I I I I I I & ' I I I I Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report This page intentionally left blank Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report APPENDIX 3.5: SCAQMD AMICUS BRIEF S219783 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA SIERRA CLUB, REVIVE THE SAN JOAQUIN, and LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF FRESNO, Plaintiffs and Appellants, V. COUNTY OF FRESNO, Defendant and Respondent, and, FRIANT RANCH, L.P., Real Party in Interest and Respondent. After a Published Decision by the Court of Appeal, filed May 27, 2014 Fifth Appellate District Case No. F066798 Appeal from the Superior Court of California, County of Fresno Case No. 11 CECG00726 Honorable Rosendo A. Pena, Jr. APPLICATION OF THE SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF NEITHER PARTY AND [PROPOSED] BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE Kurt R. Wiese, General Counsel (SBN 127251) *Barbara Baird, Chief Deputy Counsel (SBN 81507) SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Telephone: 909-396-2302; Facsimile: 909-396-2961 Email: bbaird@aqmd.gov Counsel for [Proposed] Amicus Curiae, SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT a•o1.1v10 A~ft -e 2015 CLERK SUPREME.COURT TABLE OF CONTENTS APPLICATION FOR LEA VE TO FILE amicus curiae brief.. ............ App-1 HOW THIS BRIEF WILL ASSIST THE COURT .............................. App-1 STATEMENT OF INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE ........................ App-3 CERTIFICATION REGARDING AUTHORSHIP & FUNDING ...... App-4 BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE ..................................................................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT .................................................................... 1 ARGUMENT ................................................................................................ 2 I. RELEVANT FACTUAL AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK ................. 2 A. Air Quality Regulatory Background ........................................... 2 B. The SCAQMD's Role Under CEQA .......................................... 6 II. THIS COURT SHOULD NOT SET A HARD-AND-FAST RULE CONCERNING THE EXTENT TO WHICH AN EIR MUST CORRELATE A PROJECT'S EMISSION OF POLLUTANTS WITH RESULTING HEALTH IMPACTS ............. 8 III. THE QUESTION OF WHETHER AN EIR CONTAINS SUFFICIENT ANALYSIS TO MEET CEQA'S REQUIREMENTS IS A MIXED QUESTION OF FACT AND LAW GOVERNED BY TWO DIFFERENT STANDARDS OF REVIEW ................................................................ 16 A. Standard of Review for Feasibility Determination and Sufficiency as an Informative Document.. .............................. 16 B. Friant Ranch's Rationale for Rejecting the Independent Judgment Standard of Review is Unsupported by Case Law ............................................................................................... 23 IV. COURTS MUST SCRUPULOUSLY ENFORCE THE REQUIREMENTS THAT LEAD AGENCIES CONSULT WITH AND OBTAIN COMMENTS FROM AIR DISTRICTS ............................................................................................. 26 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................... 29 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES State Cases Association of Irritated Residents v. County of Madera (2003) 107 Cal App.4th 1383 ................................................................................. 1, 9 Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1184 ............................................................................... 9, 22 Berkeley Keep Jets Over the Bay v. Board of Port Commissioners (2007) 91 Cal.App.4th 1344 .................................................................... 21, 28 Center for Biological Diversity v. County of San Bernardino (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 866 ..................................................................................... 20 Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Bd. of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553 .............................................................................................. 8-9 County of Amador v. El Dorado County Water Agency (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 931 ....................................................................................... 23 Crocker National Bank v. City and County of San Francisco (1989) 49 Cal.3d 881 ................................................................................................ 18 Ebbetts Pass Forest Watch v. California Dept. of Forestry & Fire Protection (2008) 43 Cal.4th 936 .................................................................. 2 l Fall River Wild Trout Foundation v. County of Shasta, (1999) 70 Cal.App.4th 482 ................................................................................. 27, 28 Gray v. County of Madera (2008) 167 Cal.App.4th 1099 ................................................................................... 25 Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of the Univ of Cal. ("Laurel Heights I") (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376 .......................................................... 1, 8, 19, 20, 21, 22 Natural Res. Def Council v SCAQMD, Los Angeles Superior Court No. BS 110792 ................................................. 12 Neighbors for Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line (2013) 57 Cal.4th 439 ......................................................................................... 15, 20 11 State Cases (cont'd) Orange County Air Pollution Control District v. Public Util. Com. (1971) 4 Cal.3d 945 ....................................................................................... 27 Save Our Peninsula Comm. v. Monterey County Bd. of Supervisors (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 99 .............................................................................. 19 Schenck v. County of Sonoma (2011) 198 Cal.App.4th 949 ............................................................................... 26, 27 Sierra Club v. County of Fresno (2014) 226 Cal.App.4th 704 (superseded by grant of review) 172 Cal.Rptr.3d 271 .................................................................................. 9, 23 Sierra Club v. State Bd. Of Forestry (1994) 7 Cal.4th 1215 ............................................................................................... 28 Uphold Our Heritage v. Town of Woodside (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 587 ..................................................................................... 20 Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho Cordova (2007) 40 Cal.4th 412 ................................................................... 1, 17, 19, 24, 25, 26 Western Oil & Gas Assn. v. Monterey Bay Unified APCD (1989) 49 Cal.3d 408 ................................................................................................ 5 California Statutes Health & Saf. Code§ 39666 ......................................................................... 5 Health & Saf. Code § 40000 ......................................................................... 3 Health & Saf. Code § 40001 ......................................................................... 3 Health & Saf. Code § 40410 ......................................................................... 3 Health & Saf. Code §§ 40460, et seq ............................................................ 4 Health & Saf. Code § 41508 ......................................................................... 5 Health & Saf. Code §§ 42300, et seq ............................................................ 5 Health & Saf. Code § 44320 ......................................................................... 5 Health & Saf. Code§ 44322 ......................................................................... 5 Health & Saf. Code § 44360 ......................................................................... 5 Pub. Resources Code§ 20180.3 .................................................................. 27 Pub. Resources Code § 21061 ..................................................................... 19 Pub. Resources Code § 21061.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 111 California Statutes (cont'd) Pub. Resources Code§ 21080 ....................................................................... 6 Pub. Resources Code§ 21080.5 .................................................................... 6 Pub. Resources Code§ 21083.1 .................................................................. 26 Pub. Resources Code§ 21100 ..................................................................... 27 Pub. Resources Code§ 21104 .............................................................. 6, 7 26 Pub. Resources Code § § 21150-21154 ......................................................... 7 Pub. Resources Code§ 21151.8 .................................................................. 25 Pub. Resources Code§ 21153 ............................................................ 6, 7, 26 California Ree;ulations Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, §§ 15000, et seq. ("CEQA Guidelines") CEQA Guidelines§ 15050 .............................................................................. 6 CEQA Guidelines§ 15051 .......................................................................... l, 6 CEQA Guidelines§ 15073 ............................................................................ 6 CEQA Guidelines § 15086 ............................................................................ 6 CEQA Guidelines§ 15088.5 ......................................................................... 28 CEQA Guidelines§ 15096 .............................................................................. 6 CEQA Guidelines§ 15126.2 ......................................................................... 25 CEQA Guidelines § 15131 ............................................................................ 26 CEQA Guidelines§ 15144 ...................................................................... 19, 24 CEQA Guidelines§ 15151 .................................................................. 9, 18, 19 CEQA Guidelines§ 15204 .................................................................... 1, 9, 21 CEQA Guidelines§ 15251 ............................................................................ 6 CEQA Guidelines§ 15366 .............................................................................. 7 CEQA Guidelines§ 15381 .............................................................................. 6 Cal. Code Regs., tit. 17, § 60104 .................................................................... 3 Federal Statutes 42 U.S.C. § 7401; CAA§ 101 ...................................................................... 4 42 U.S.C. § 7408; CAA§ 108 ...................................................................... 3 42 U.S.C. § 7409; CAA§ 109 ...................................................................... 4 42 U.S.C. § 7410; CAA§ 110 .................................................................. 4, 5 42 U.S.C. § 7412; CAA§ 112 ...................................................................... 5 42 U.S.C. § 7502; CAA§ 172 ................................................................ 5, 13 42 U.S.C. § 7503; CAA§ 173 ................................................................ 5, 13 42 U.S.C. § 751 la; CAA§ 182 ................................................................... 13 42 U.S.C. § 7521; CAA§ 202 ...................................................................... 4 42 U.S.C. § 7543; CAA§ 209 ...................................................................... 4 42 U.S.C. § 7547; CAA§ 213 ...................................................................... 4 IV Rules SCAQMD Rule 1303 .................................................................................... 7 SCAQMD Rule 1401 ............................................................................ 5, 8, 9 Other Association of Environmental Professionals, 2015 CEQA Statute and Guidelines (2015) (Appendix G, "Environmental Checklist Form." ........................................................................................................... 24 CARB, Health Impacts Analysis: PM Premature Death Relationship ............................................................... 14 CARB, Health Impacts Analysis: PM Mortality Relationship ............................................................................ 16 CARB, Resolution 98-35, Aug. 27, 1998 ....................................................... 8 SCAQMD, Air Quality Analysis Handbook ................................................. 13 SCAQMD, Final 2012 AQMP (Feb. 2013) .............................................. 3, 11 SCAQMD, Final Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration for: Warren E&P, Inc. WTU Central Facility, New Equipment Project (certified July 19, 2011) ............................................................. 14-15 SCAQMD Governing Board Agenda, February 4, 2011, Agenda Item 26, Assessment for: Re-adoption of Proposed Rule 1315 - Federal New Source Review Tracking System, ............................................. 12 SCAQMD Governing Board Agenda, April 3, 2015, Agenda Item 16, Attachment A .................................................................... 7 SCAQMD, Health Risk Assessment Summary form ................................... 10 SCAQMD, Supplemental Guidelines for Preparing Risk Assessments for the Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Information and Assessment Act (AB2588) .............................................................................. 10 U.S. EPA, Ground Level Ozone ................................................................... 11 U.S. EPA, Guideline on Ozone Monitoring Site Selection (Aug. 1998) EPA-454/R-98-002 § 5.1.2 ................................................................. 11 U.S. EPA, Health Effects of Ozone in the General Population, Figure 9, ........................................................................................................ 11 U.S. EPA, National Ambient Air Quality Standards {NAAQS) ..................... 4 U.S. EPA, Particulate Matter (PM) ................................................................ .4 V TO THE HONORABLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT: APPLICATION FOR LEA VE TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF Pursuant to Rule 8.520( f) of the California Rules of Court, the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) respectfully requests leave to file the attached amicus curiae brief. Because SCAQMD's position differs from that of either party, we request leave to submit this amicus brief in support of neither party. HOW THIS BRIEF WILL ASSIST THE COURT SCAQMD's proposed amicus brief takes a position on two of the issues in this case. In both instances, its position differs from that of either party. The issues are: 1) Does the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) require an environmental impact report (EIR) to correlate a project's air pollution emissions with specific levels of health impacts? 2) What is the proper standard of review for determining whether an EIR provides sufficient information on the health impacts caused by a project's emission of air pollutants? This brief will assist the Court by discussing the practical realities of correlating identified air quality impacts with specific health outcomes. In short, CEQA requires agencies to provide detailed information about a project's air quality impacts that is sufficient for the public and decisionmakers to adequately evaluate the project and meaningfully understand its impacts. However, the level of analysis is governed by a rule of reason; CEQA only requires agencies to conduct analysis if it is reasonably feasible to do so. App-I With regard to health-related air quality impacts, an analysis that correlates a project's air pollution emissions with specific levels of health impacts will be feasible in some cases but not others. Whether it is feasible depends on a variety of factors, including the nature of the project and the nature of the analysis under consideration. The feasibility of analysis may also change over time as air districts and others develop new tools for measuring projects' air quality related health impacts. Because SCAQMD has among the most sophisticated air quality modeling and health impact evaluation capability of any of the air districts in the State, it is uniquely situated to express an opinion on the extent to which the Court should hold that CEQA requires lead agencies to correlate air quality impacts with specific health outcomes. SCAQMD can also offer a unique perspective on the question of the appropriate standard of review. SCAQMD submits that the proper standard of review for determining whether an EIR is sufficient as an informational document is more nuanced than argued by either party. In our view, this is a mixed question of fact and law. It includes determining whether additional analysis is feasible, which is primarily a factual question that should be reviewed under the substantial evidence standard. However, it also involves determining whether the omission of a particular analysis renders an EIR insufficient to serve CEQA's purpose as a meaningful, informational document. If a lead agency has not determined that a requested analysis is infeasible, it is the court's role to determine whether the EIR nevertheless meets CEQA's purposes, and courts should not defer to the lead agency's conclusions regarding the legal sufficiency of an EIR' s analysis. The ultimate question of whether an EIR' s analysis is "sufficient" to serve CEQA's informational purposes is predominately a question of law that courts should review de novo. App-2 This brief will explain the rationale for these arguments and may assist the Court in reaching a conclusion that accords proper respect to a lead agency's factual conclusions while maintaining judicial authority over the ultimate question of what level of analysis CEQA requires. STATEMENT OF INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE The SCAQMD is the regional agency primarily responsible for air pollution control in the South Coast Air Basin, which consists of all of Orange County and the non-desert portions of the Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties. (Health & Saf. Code § 4041 0; Cal. Code Regs., tit. 17, § 60104.) The SCAQMD participates in the CEQA process in several ways. Sometimes it acts as a lead agency that prepares CEQA documents for projects. Other times it acts as a responsible agency when it has permit authority over some part of a project that is undergoing CEQA review by a different lead agency. Finally, SCAQMD also acts as a commenting agency for CEQA ,documents that it receives because it is a public agency with jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by the project. In all of these capacities, SCAQMD will be affected by the decision in this case. SCAQMD sometimes submits comments requesting that a lead agency perform an additional type of air quality or health impacts analysis. On the other hand, SCAQMD sometimes determines that a particular type of health impact analysis is not feasible or would not produce reliable and informative results. Thus, SCAQMD will be affected by the Court's resolution of the extent to which CEQA requires EIRs to correlate emissions and health impacts, and its resolution of the proper standard of review. App-3 CERTIFICATION REGARDING AUTHORSHIP AND FUNDING No party or counsel in the pending case authored the proposed amicus curiae brief in whole or in part, or made any monetary contribution intended to fund the preparation or submission of the brief. No person or entity other than the proposed Amicus Curiae made any monetary contribution intended to fund the preparation or submission of the brief. DATED: April 3, 2015 Respectfully submitted, SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT KURT R. WIESE, GENERAL COUNSEL BARBARA BAIRD, CHIEF DEPUTY COUNSEL By:~~ Barbara Baird Attorneys for [proposed} Amicus Curiae SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DIST/CT App-4 BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) submits that this Court should not try to establish a hard-and-fast rule concerning whether lead agencies are required to correlate emissions of air pollutants with specific health consequences in their environmental impact reports (EIR). The level of detail required in EIRs is governed by a few, core CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) principles. As this Court has stated, "[ a ]n EIR must include detail sufficient to enable those who did not participate in its preparation to understand and to consider meaningfully the issues raised by the proposed project." (Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of the Univ of Cal. (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 405 ["Laurel Heights 1"]) Accordingly, "an agency must use its best efforts to find out and disclose all that it reasonably can." ( Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho Cordova (2007) 40 Cal.4th 412,428 (quoting CEQA Guidelines§ 15144)1.). However, "[ a ]nalysis of environmental effects need not be exhaustive, but will be judged in light of what is reasonably feasible." (Association of Irritated Residents v. County of Madera (2003) 107 Cal.App.4th 1383, 1390; CEQA Guidelines§§ 15151, 15204(a).) With regard to analysis of air quality related health impacts, EIRs must generally quantify a project's pollutant emissions, but in some cases it is not feasible to correlate these emissions to specific, quantifiable health impacts (e.g., premature mortality; hospital admissions). In such cases, a general description of the adverse health impacts resulting from the pollutants at issue may be sufficient. In other cases, due to the magnitude 1 The CEQA Guidelines are found at Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14 §§ 15000, et seq. 1 or nature of the pollution emissions, as well as the specificity of the project involved, it may be feasible to quantify health impacts. Or there may be a less exacting, but still meaningful analysis of health impacts that can feasibly be performed. In these instances, agencies should disclose those impacts. SCAQMD also submits that whether or not an EIR complies with CEQA's informational mandates by providing sufficient, feasible analysis is a mixed question of fact and law. Pertinent here, the question of whether an EIR's discussion of health impacts from air pollution is sufficient to allow the public to understand and consider meaningfully the issues involves two inquiries: (1) Is it feasible to provide the information or analysis that a commenter is requesting or a petitioner is arguing should be required?; and (2) Even if it is feasible, is the agency relying on other policy or legal considerations to justify not preparing the requested analysis? The first question of whether an analysis is feasible is primarily a question of fact that should be judged by the substantial evidence standard. The second inquiry involves evaluating CEQA's information disclosure purposes against the asserted reasons to not perform the requested analysis. For example, an agency might believe that its EIR meets CEQA's informational disclosure standards even without a particular analysis, and therefore choose not to conduct that analysis. SCAQMD submits that this is more of a legal question, which should be reviewed de novo as a question oflaw. ARGUMENT I. RELEVANT FACTUAL AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK. A. Air Quality Regulatory Background The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) is one of the local and regional air pollution control districts and air quality 2 management districts in California. The SCAQMD is the regional air pollution agency for the South Coast Air Basin, which consists of all of Orange County and the non-desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties. (Health & Saf. Code § 40410, 17 Cal. Code Reg. § 60104.) The SCAQMD also includes the Coachella Valley in Riverside County (Palm Springs area to the Salton Sea). (SCAQMD, Final 2012 AQMP (Feb. 2013), http://www.aqmd.gov/home/library/clean-air-plans/air- quality-mgt-plan/final-2012-air-quality-management-plan; then follow "chapter 7" hyperlink; pp 7-1, 7-3 (last visited Apr. 1, 2015).) The SCAQMD's jurisdiction includes over 16 million residents and has the worst or nearly the worst air pollution levels in the country for ozone and fine particulate matter. (SCAQMD, Final 2012 AQMP (Feb. 2013), http://www.aqmd.gov/home/library/clean-air-plans/air-quality-mgt- plan/final-2012-air-quality-management-plan; then follow "Executive Summary" hyperlink p. ES-1 (last visited Apr. 1, 2015).) Under California law, the local and regional districts are primarily responsible for controlling air pollution from all sources except motor vehicles. (Health & Saf. Code§ 40000.) The California Air Resources Board (CARB), part of the California Environmental Protection Agency, is primarily responsible for controlling pollution from motor vehicles. (Id.) The air districts must adopt rules to achieve and maintain the state and federal ambient air quality standards within their jurisdictions. (Health & Saf. Code § 40001.) The federal Clean Air Act (CAA) requires the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to identify pollutants that are widely distributed and pose a threat to human health, developing a so-called "criteria" document. (42 U.S.C. § 7408; CAA§ 108.) These pollutants are frequently called "criteria pollutants." EPA must then establish "national ambient air quality standards" at levels "requisite to protect public health", 3 allowing "an adequate margin of safety." (42 U.S.C. § 7409; CAA§ 109.) EPA has set standards for six identified pollutants: ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, particulate matter (PM), and lead. (U.S. EPA, National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), http://www.epa.gov/air/criteria.html (last updated Oct. 21, 2014).)2 Under the Clean Air Act, EPA sets emission standards for motor vehicles and "nonroad engines" (mobile farm and construction equipment, marine vessels, locomotives, aircraft, etc.). (42 U.S.C. §§ 7521, 7547; CAA§§ 202, 213.) California is the only state allowed to establish emission standards for motor vehicles and most nonroad sources; however, it may only do so with EPA's approval. (42 U.S.C. §§ 7543(b), 7543(e); CAA§§ 209(b), 209(c).) Sources such as manufacturing facilities, power plants and refineries that are not mobile are often referred to as "stationary sources." The Clean Air Act charges state and local agencies with the primary responsibility to attain the national ambient air quality standards. (42 U.S.C. § 7401(a)(3); CAA§ 101(a)(3).) Each state must adopt and implement a plan including enforceable measures to achieve and maintain the national ambient air quality standards. (42 U.S.C. § 7410; CAA§ 110.) The SCAQMD and CARB jointly prepare portion of the plan for the South Coast Air Basin and submit it for approval by EPA. (Health & Saf. Code §§ 40460, et seq.) The Clean Air Act also requires state and local agencies to adopt a permit program requiring, among other things, that new or modified "major" stationary sources use technology to achieve the "lowest achievable emission rate," and to control minor stationary sources as 2 Particulate matter (PM) is further divided into two categories: fine particulate or PM2_5 (particles with a diameter of less than or equal to 2.5 microns) and coarse particulate (PM10) (particles with a diameter of 10 microns or less). (U.S. EPA, Particulate Matter (PM), http://www.epa.gov/airguality/particlepollution/ (last visited Apr. 1, 2015).) 4 needed to help attain the standards. (42 U.S.C. §§ 7502(c)(5), 7503(a)(2), 7410(a)(2)(C); CAA§§ l 72(c)(5), 173(a)(2), 110(a)(2)(C).) The air districts implement these permit programs in California. (Health & Saf. Code§§ 42300, et seq.) The Clean Air Act also sets out a regulatory structure for over 100 so-called "hazardous air pollutants" calling for EPA to establish "maximum achievable control technology" (MACT) for sources of these pollutants. (42 U.S.C. § 7412(d)(2); CAA§ 112(d)(2).) California refers to these pollutants as "toxic air contaminants" (TA Cs) which are subject to two state-required programs. The first program requires "air toxics control measures" for specific categories of sources. (Health & Saf. Code § 39666.) The other program requires larger stationary sources and sources identified by air districts to prepare "health risk assessments" for impacts of toxic air contaminants. (Health & Saf. Code§§ 44320(b), 44322, 44360.) If the health risk exceeds levels identified by the district as "significant," the facility must implement a "risk reduction plan" to bring its risk levels below "significant" levels. Air districts may adopt additional more stringent requirements than those required by state law, including requirements for toxic air contaminants. (Health & Saf. Code § 41508; Western Oil & Gas Assn. v. Monterey Bay Unified APCD (1989) 49 Cal.3d 408, 414.) For example, SCAQMD has adopted a rule requiring new or modified sources to keep their risks below specified levels and use best available control technology (BACT) for toxics. (SCAQMD, Rule 1401- New Source Review of Toxic Air Contaminants, http://www.aqmd.gov/home/regulations/rules/scaqmd-rule-book/regulation- xiv; then follow "Rule 1401" hyperlink (last visited Apr. 1, 2015).) 5 B. The SCAQMD's Role Under CEQA The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires public agencies to perform an environmental review and appropriate analysis for projects that they implement or approve. (Pub. Resources Code § 21080(a).) The agency with primary approval authority for a particular project is generally the "lead agency" that prepares the appropriate CEQA document. (CEQA Guidelines§§ 15050, 15051.) Other agencies having a subsequent approval authority over all or part of a project are called "responsible" agencies that must determine whether the CEQA document is adequate for their use. (CEQA Guidelines§§ 15096(c), 15381.) Lead agencies must also consult with and circulate their environmental impact reports to "trustee agencies" and agencies "with jurisdiction by law" including "authority over resources which may be affected by the project." (Pub. Resources Code§§ 21104(a), 21153; CEQA Guidelines §§ 15086(a)(3), 15073(c).) The SCAQMD has a role in all these aspects of CEQA. Fulfilling its responsibilities to implement its air quality plan and adopt rules to attain the national ambient air quality standards, SCAQMD adopts a dozen or more rules each year to require pollution reductions from a wide variety of sources. The SCAQMD staff evaluates each rule for any adverse environmental impact and prepares the appropriate CEQA document. Although most rules reduce air emissions, they may have secondary environmental impacts such as use of water or energy or disposal of waste-e.g., spent catalyst from control equipment.3 3 The SCAQMD's CEQA program for its rules is a "Certified Regulatory Program" under which it prepares a "functionally equivalent" document in lieu of a negative declaration or EIR. (Pub. Resources Code§ 21080.5, CEQA Guidelines§ 15251(1).) 6 The SCAQMD also approves a large number of permits every year to construct new, modified, or replacement facilities that emit regulated air pollutants. The majority of these air pollutant sources have already been included in an earlier CEQA evaluation for a larger project, are currently being evaluated by a local government as lead agency, or qualify for an exemption. However, the SCAQMD sometimes acts as lead agency for major projects where the local government does not have a discretionary approval. In such cases, SCAQMD prepares and certifies a negative declaration or environmental impact report (EIR) as appropriate.4 SCAQMD evaluates perhaps a dozen such permit projects under CEQA each year. SCAQMD is often also a "responsible agency" for many projects since it must issue a permit for part of the projects (e.g., a boiler used to provide heat in a commercial building). For permit projects evaluated by another lead agency under CEQA, SCAQMD has the right to determine that the CEQA document is inadequate for its purposes as a responsible agency, but it may not do so because its permit program already requires all permitted sources to use the best available air pollution control technology. (SCAQMD, Rule 1303(a)(l) -Requirements, http://www.aqmd.gov/home/regulations/rules/ scagmd-rule-book/re gulation- xi ii; then follow "Rule 1303" hyperlink (last visited Apr. 1, 2015).) Finally, SCAQMD receives as many as 60 or more CEQA documents each month (around 500 per year) in its role as commenting agency or an agency with "jurisdiction by law" over air quality-a natural resource affected by the project. (Pub. Resources Code§§ 21104(a), 21153; CEQA Guidelines§ 15366(a)(3).) The SCAQMD staff provides comments on as many as 25 or 30 such documents each month. 4 The SCAQMD's permit projects are not included in its Certified Regulatory Program, and are evaluated under the traditional local government CEQA analysis. (Pub. Resources Code§§ 21150-21154.) 7 (SCAQMD Governing Board Agenda, Apr. 3, 2015, Agenda Item 16, Attachment A, http://www.aqmd.gov/home/library/meeting-agendas- minutes/agenda?title=goveming-board-meeting-agenda-april-3-2015; then follow "16. Lead Agency Projects and Environmental Documents Received by SCAQMD" hyperlink (last visited Apr. 1, 2015).) Of course, SCAQMD focuses its commenting efforts on the more significant projects. Typically, SCAQMD comments on the adequacy of air quality analysis, appropriateness of assumptions and methodology, and completeness of the recommended air quality mitigation measures. Staff may comment on the need to prepare a health risk assessment detailing the projected cancer and noncancer risks from toxic air contaminants resulting from the project, particularly the impacts of diesel particulate matter, which CARB has identified as a toxic air contaminant based on its carcinogenic effects. (California Air Resources Board, Resolution 98-35, Aug. 27, 1998, http://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/diesltac/diesltac.htm; then follow Resolution 98-35 hyperlink (last visited Apr. 1, 2015).) Because SCAQMD already requires new or modified stationary sources of toxic air contaminants to use the best available control technology for toxics and to keep their risks below specified levels, (SCAQMD Rule 1401, supra, note 15), the greatest opportunity to further mitigate toxic impacts through the CEQA process is by reducing emissions-particularly diesel emissions-from vehicles. II. THIS COURT SHOULD NOT SET A HARD-AND-FAST RULE CONCERNING THE EXTENT TO WHICH AN EIR MUST CORRELATE A PROJECT'S EMISSION OF POLLUTANTS WITH RESULTING HEALTH IMPACTS. Numerous cases hold that courts do not review the correctness of an EIR's conclusions but rather its sufficiency as an informative document. (Laurel Heights 1, supra, 47 Cal.3d at p. 392; Citizens of Goleta Valley v. 8 Bd. of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 569; Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1184, 1197.) As stated by the Court of Appeal in this case, where an EIR has addressed a topic, but the petitioner claims that the information provided about that topic is insufficient, courts must "draw[] a line that divides sufficient discussions from those that are insufficient." (Sierra Club v. County of Fresno (2014) 226 Cal.App.4th 704 (superseded by grant of review) 172 Cal.Rptr.3d 271, 290.) The Court of Appeal readily admitted that "[t]he terms themselves -sufficient and insufficient -provide little, if any, guidance as to where the line should be drawn. They are simply labels applied once the court has completed its analysis." (Id.) The CEQA Guidelines, however, provide guidance regarding what constitutes a sufficient discussion of impacts. Section 15151 states that "the sufficiency of an EIR is to be reviewed in light of what is reasonably feasible." Case law reflects this: "Analysis of environmental effects need not be exhaustive, but will be judged in light of what was reasonably feasible." (Association of Irritated Residents v. County of Madera, supra, 107 Cal.App.4th at p. 1390; see also CEQA Guidelines§ 15204(a).) Applying this test, this Court cannot realistically establish a hard- and-fast rule that an analysis correlating air pollution impacts of a project to quantified resulting health impacts is always required, or indeed that it is never required. Simply put, in some cases such an analysis will be "feasible"; in some cases it will not. For example, air pollution control districts often require a proposed new source of toxic air contaminants to prepare a "health risk assessment" before issuing a permit to construct. District rules often limit the allowable cancer risk the new source may cause to the "maximally exposed individual" (worker and residence exposures). (See, e.g., SCAQMD Rule 140l(c)(8); 140l(d)(l), supra note 15.) In order to perform this analysis, it 9 is necessary to have data regarding the sources and types of air toxic contaminants, location of emission points, velocity of emissions, the meteorology and topography of the area, and the location of receptors (worker and residence). (SCAQMD, Supplemental Guidelines for Preparing Risk Assessments for the Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Information and Assessment Act (AB2588), pp. 11-16; (last visited Apr. 1, 2015) http://www. aqmd. gov /home/library/ documents-support-material; "Guidelines" hyperlink; AB2588; then follow AB2588 Risk Assessment Guidelines hyper link.) Thus, it is feasible to determine the health risk posed by a new gas station locating at an intersection in a mixed use area, where receptor locations are known. On the other hand, it may not be feasible to perform a health risk assessment for airborne toxics that will be emitted by a generic industrial building that was built on "speculation" (i.e., without knowing the future tenant(s)). Even where a health risk assessment can be prepared, however, the resulting maximum health risk value is only a calculation of risk-it does not necessarily mean anyone will contract cancer as a result of the project. In order to find the "cancer burden" or expected additional cases of cancer resulting from the project, it is also necessary to know the numbers and location of individuals living within the "zone of impact" of the project: i.e., those living in areas where the projected cancer risk from the project exceeds one in a million. (SCAQMD, Health Risk Assessment Summary form, http://www.aqmd.gov/home/forms; filter by "AB2588" category; then "Health Risk Assessment" hyperlink (last visited Apr. 1, 2015).) The affected population is divided into bands of those exposed to at least 1 in a million risk, those exposed to at least 10 in a million risk, etc. up to those exposed at the highest levels. (Id.) This data allows agencies to calculate an approximate number of additional cancer cases expected from 10 the project. However, it is not possible to predict which particular individuals will be affected. For the so-called criteria pollutants5, such as ozone, it may be more difficult to quantify health impacts. Ozone is formed in the atmosphere from the chemical reaction of the nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOC) in the presence of sunlight. (U.S. EPA, Ground Level Ozone, http://www.epa.gov/airquality/ozonepollution/ (last updated Mar. 25, 2015).) It takes time and the influence of meteorological conditions for these reactions to occur, so ozone may be formed at a distance downwind from the sources. (U.S. EPA, Guideline on Ozone Monitoring Site Selection (Aug. 1998) EPA-454/R-98-002 § 5.1.2, http://www.epa.gov/ttnamtil/archive/cpreldoc.html (last visited Apr. 1, 2015).) NOx and VOC are known as "precursors" of ozone. Scientifically, health effects from ozone are correlated with increases in the ambient level of ozone in the air a person breathes. (U.S. EPA, Health Effects of Ozone in the General Population, Figure 9, http://www.epa.gov/ apti/ ozonehealth/population.html#levels (last visited Apr. 1, 2015).) However, it takes a large amount of additional precursor emissions to cause a modeled increase in ambient ozone levels over an entire region. For example, the SCAQMD's 2012 AQMP showed that reducing NOx by 432 tons per day (157,680 tons/year) and reducing VOC by 187 tons per day (68,255 tons/year) would reduce ozone levels at the SCAQMD's monitor site with the highest levels by only 9 parts per billion. (South Coast Air Quality Management District, Final 2012 AQMP (February 2013), http://www.aqmd.gov/home/library/clean-air-plans/air- quality-mgt-plan/final-2012-air-quality-management-plan; then follow "Appendix V: Modeling & Attainment Demonstrations" hyperlink, 5 See discussion of types of pollutants, supra, Part I.A. 11 pp. v-4-2, v-7-4, v-7-24.) SCAQMD staff does not currently know of a way to accurately quantify ozone-related health impacts caused by NOx or VOC emissions from relatively small projects. On the other hand, this type of analysis may be feasible for projects on a regional scale with very high emissions ofNOx and VOCs, where impacts are regional. For example, in 2011 the SCAQMD performed a health impact analysis in its CEQA document for proposed Rule 1315, which authorized various newly-permitted sources to use offsets from the districts "internal bank" of emission reductions. This CEQA analysis accounted for essentially all the increases in emissions due to new or modified sources in the District between 2010 and 2030.6 The SCAQMD was able to correlate this very large emissions increase (e.g., 6,620 pounds per day NOx (1,208 tons per year), 89,180 pounds per day VOC (16,275 tons per year)) to expected health outcomes from ozone and particulate matter (e.g., 20 premature deaths per year and 89,947 school absences in the year 2030 due to ozone).7 (SCAQMD Governing Board Agenda, February 4, 2011, Agenda Item 26, Assessment for: Re-adoption of Proposed Rule 1315 -Federal New Source Review Tracking System (see hyperlink in fn 6) at p. 4.1-35, Table 4.1-29.) 6 (SCAQMD Governing Board Agenda, February 4, 2011, Agenda Item 26, Attachment G, Assessment for: Re-adoption of Proposed Rule 1315 - Federal New Source Review Tracking System, Vol. 1, p.4.0-6, http://www.aqmd.gov/home/library/meeting-agendas- minutes/ agenda ?ti tle=governing-board-meeting-agenda-february-4-2011 ; the follow "26. Adopt Proposed Rule 1315 -Federal New Source Review Tracking System" (last visited April 1, 2015).) 7 The SCAQMD was able to establish the location of future NOx and VOC emissions by assuming that new projects would be built in the same locations and proportions as existing stationary sources. This CEQA document was upheld by the Los Angeles County Superior Court in Natural Res. Def Council v SCAQMD, Los Angeles Superior Court No. BS110792). 12 However, a project emitting only 10 tons per year ofNOx or VOC is small enough that its regional impact on ambient ozone levels may not be detected in the regional air quality models that are currently used to determine ozone levels. Thus, in this case it would not be feasible to directly correlate project emissions of VOC or NOx with specific health impacts from ozone. This is in part because ozone formation is not linearly related to emissions. Ozone impacts vary depending on the location of the emissions, the location of other precursor emissions, meteorology and seasonal impacts, and because ozone is formed some time later and downwind from the actual emission. (EPA Guideline on Ozone Monitoring Site Selection (Aug. 1998) EPA-454/R-98-002, § 5.1.2; https://www.epa.gov/ttnamtil/archive/cpreldoc.html; then search "Guideline on Ozone Monitoring Site Selection" click on pdf) (last viewed Apr. 1, 2015).) SCAQMD has set its CEQA "significance" threshold for NOx and VOC at 10 tons per year (expressed as 55 lb/day). (SCAQMD, Air Quality Analysis Hand book, http://www.aqmd.gov/home/regulations/ ceqa/ air- quality-analysis-handbook; then follow "SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds" hyperlink (last visited Apr. 1, 2015).) This is because the federal Clean Air Act defines a "major" stationary source for "extreme" ozone nonattainment areas such as SCAQMD as one emitting 10 tons/year. (42 U.S.C. §§ 751 la(e), 751 la(f); CAA§§ 182(e), 182(f).) Under the Clean Air Act, such sources are subject to enhanced control requirements (42 U.S.C. §§ 7502(c)(5), 7503; CAA§§ 172(c)(5), 173), so SCAQMD decided this was an appropriate threshold for making a CEQA "significance" finding and requiring feasible mitigation. Essentially, SC.AQMD takes the position that a source that emits 10 tons/year ofNOx or VOC would contribute cumulatively to ozone formation. Therefore, lead agencies that use SCAQMD's thresholds of significance may determine 13 that many projects have "significant" air quality impacts and must apply all feasible mitigation measures, yet will not be able to precisely correlate the project to quantifiable health impacts, unless the emissions are sufficiently high to use a regional modeling program. In the case of particulate matter (PM2_5)8, another "criteria" pollutant, SCAQMD staff is aware of two possible methods of analysis. SCAQMD used regional modeling to predict expected health impacts from its proposed Rule 1315, as mentioned above. Also, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) has developed a methodology that can predict expected mortality (premature deaths) from large amounts of PM2_5_ (California Air Resources Board, Health Impacts Analysis: PM Premature Death Relationship, http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/health/pm-mort/pm- mort arch.htm (last reviewed Jan. 19, 2012).) SCAQMD used the CARB methodology to predict impacts from three very large power plants (e.g., 731-1837 lbs/day). (Final Environmental Assessment for Rule 1315, supra, pp 4.0-12, 4.1-13, 4.1-37 (e.g., 125 premature deaths in the entire SCAQMD in 2030), 4.1-39 (0.05 to 1. 77 annual premature deaths from power plants.) Again, this project involved large amounts of additional PM2_5 in the District, up to 2.82 tons/day (5,650 lbs/day of PM2_5, or, or 1029 tons/year. (Id. at table 4.1-4, p. 4.1-10.) However, the primary author of the CARB methodology has reported that this PM2_5 health impact methodology is not suited for small projects and may yield unreliable results due to various uncertainties. 9 (SCAQMD, Final Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration for: Warren 8 SCAQMD has not attained the latest annual or 24-hour national ambient air quality standards for "PM25" or particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter. 9 Among these uncertainties are the representativeness of the population used in the methodology, and the specific source of PM and the corresponding health impacts. (Id. at p. 2-24.) 14 E&P, Inc. WTU Central Facility, New Equipment Project (certified July 19, 2011), http://www.agmd.gov/home/library/ documents-support- material/lead-agency-permit-projects/permit-project-documents---year- 2011; then follow "Final Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration for Warren E&P Inc. WTU Central Facility, New Equipment Project" hyperlink, pp. 2-22, 2-23 (last visited Apr. 1, 2015).) Therefore, when SCAQMD prepared a CEQA document for the expansion of an existing oil production facility, with very small PM2_5 increases (3.8 lb/day) and a very small affected population, staff elected not to use the CARB methodology for using estimated PM2_5 emissions to derive a projected premature mortality number and explained why it would be inappropriate to do so. (Id. at pp 2-22 to 2-24.) SCAQMD staff concluded that use of this methodology for such a small source could result in unreliable findings and would not provide meaningful information. (Id. at pp. 2-23, 2-25.) This CEQA document was not challenged in court. In the above case, while it may have been technically possible to plug the data into the methodology, the results would not have been reliable or meaningful. SCAQMD believes that an agency should not be required to perform analyses that do not produce reliable or meaningful results. This Court has already held that an agency may decline to use even the "normal" "existing conditions" CEQA baseline where to do so would be misleading or without informational value. (Neighbors for Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line (2013) 57 Cal.4th 439, 448, 457.) The same should be true for a decision that a particular study or analysis would not provide reliable or meaningful results. 10 10 Whether a particular study would result in "informational value" is a part of deciding whether it is "feasible." CEQA defines "feasible" as "capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental, social, and 15 Therefore, it is not possible to set a hard-and-fast rule on whether a correlation of air quality impacts with specific quantifiable health impacts is required in all cases. Instead, the result turns on whether such an analysis is reasonably feasible in the particular case.11 Moreover, what is reasonably feasible may change over time as scientists and regulatory agencies continually seek to improve their ability to predict health impacts. For example, CARB staff has been directed by its Governing Board to reassess and improve the methodology for estimating premature deaths. (California Air Resources Board, Health Impacts Analysis: PM Mortality Relationship, http://www. arb. ca. gov /research/health/pm-mort/pm-mort.htm (last reviewed Dec. 29, 2010).) This factor also counsels against setting any hard-and-fast rule in this case. III. THE QUESTION OF WHETHER AN EIR CONTAINS SUFFICIENT ANALYSIS TO MEET CEQA'S REQUIREMENTS IS A MIXED QUESTION OF FACT AND LAW GOVERNED BY TWO DIFFERENT STANDARDS OF REVIEW. A. Standard of Review for Feasibility Determination and Sufficiency as an Informative Document A second issue in this case is whether courts should review an EIR's informational sufficiency under the "substantial evidence" test as argued by Friant Ranch or the "independent judgment" test as argued by Sierra Club. technological factors." (Pub. Resources Code § 21061.1.) A study cannot be "accomplished in a successful manner" if it produces unreliable or misleading results. 11 In this case, the lead agency did not have an opportunity to determine whether the requested analysis was feasible because the comment was non- specific. Therefore, SCAQMD suggests that this Court, after resolving the legal issues in the case, direct the Court of Appeal to remand the case to the lead agency for a determination of whether the requested analysis is feasible. Because Fresno County, the lead agency, did not seek review in this Court, it seems likely that the County has concluded that at least some level of correlation of air pollution with health impacts is feasible. 16 As this Court has explained, "a reviewing court must adjust its scrutiny to the nature of the alleged defect, depending on whether the claim is predominantly one of improper procedure or a dispute over the facts." (Vineyard Area Citizens v. City of Rancho Cordova, supra, 40 Cal.4th at 435.) For questions regarding compliance with proper procedure or other legal questions, courts review an agency's action de novo under the "independent judgment" test. (Id.) On the other hand, courts review factual disputes only for substantial evidence, thereby "accord[ing] greater deference to the agency's substantive factual conclusions." (Id.) Here, Friant Ranch and Sierra Club agree that the case involves the question of whether an EIR includes sufficient information regarding a project's impacts. However, they disagree on the proper standard of review for answering this question: Sierra Club contends that courts use the independent judgment standard to determine whether an EIR's analysis is sufficient to meet CEQA's informational purposes, 12 while Friant Ranch contends that the substantial evidence standard applies to this question. I II I II I I I Ill Ill II I II I Ill Ill 12 Sierra Club acknowledges that courts use the substantial evidence standard when reviewing predicate factual issues, but argues that courts ultimately decide as a matter of law what CEQA requires. (Answering Brief, pp. 14, 23.) 17 SCAQMD submits that the issue is more nuanced than either party contends. We submit that, whether a CEQA document includes sufficient analysis to satisfy CEQA's informational mandates is a mixed question of fact and law, 13 containing two levels of inquiry that should be judged by different standards. 14 The state CEQA Guidelines set forth standards for the adequacy of environmental analysis. Guidelines Section 15151 states: An EIR should be prepared with a sufficient degree of analysis to provide decision makers with information which enables them to make a decision which intelligently takes account of environmental consequences. An evaluation of the environmental effects of a proposed project need not be exhaustive, but the sufficiency of an EIR is to be reviewed in light of what is reasonably feasible. Disagreement among experts does not make an EIR inadequate, but the EIR should summarize the main points of disagreement among the experts. The courts have looked not for perfection, but for adequacy, completeness, and a good-faith effort at full disclosure. In this case, the basic question is whether the underlying analysis of air quality impacts made the EIR "sufficient" as an informative document. However, whether the EIR's analysis was sufficient is judged in light of what was reasonably feasible. This represents a mixed question of fact and law that is governed by two different standards of review. 13 Friant Ranch actually states that the claim that an EIR lacks sufficient relevant information is, "most properly thought of as raising mixed questions of fact and law." (Opening Brief, p. 27.) However, the remainder of its argument claims that the court should apply the substantial evidence standard of review to all aspects of the issue. 14 Mixed questions of fact and law issues may implicate predominantly factual subordinate questions that are reviewed under the substantial evidence test even though the ultimate question may be reviewed by the independent judgment test. Crocker National Bank v. City and County of San Francisco (1989) 49 Cal.3d 881, 888-889. 18 SCAQMD submits that an EIR's sufficiency as an informational document is ultimately a legal question that courts should determine using their independent judgment. This Court's language in Laurel Heights I supports this position. As this Court explained: "The court does not pass upon the correctness of the EIR's environmental conclusions, but only upon its sufficiency as an informative document." (Laurel Heights I, supra, 47 Cal.3d at 392-393) (emphasis added.) As described above, the Court in Vineyard Area Citizens v. City of Rancho Cordova, supra, 40 Cal.4th at 431, also used its independent judgment to determine what level of analysis CEQA requires for water supply impacts. The Court did not defer to the lead agency's opinion regarding the law's requirements; rather, it determined for itself what level of analysis was necessary to meet "[t]he law's informational demands." (Id. at p. 432.) Further, existing case law also holds that where an agency fails to comply with CEQA's information disclosure requirements, the agency has "failed to proceed in the manner required by law." (Save Our Peninsula Comm. v. Monterey County Bd. of Supervisors (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 99, 118.) However, whether an EIR satisfies CEQA's requirements depends in part on whether it was reasonably feasible for an agency to conduct additional or more thorough analysis. EIRs must contain "a detailed statement" of a project's impacts (Pub. Res. Code § 21061 ), and an agency must "use its best efforts to find out and disclose all that it reasonably can." (CEQA Guidelines§ 15144.) Nevertheless, "the sufficiency of an EIR is to be reviewed in light of what is reasonably feasible." (CEQA Guidelines § 15151.) SCAQMD submits that the question of whether additional analysis or a particular study suggested by a commenter is "feasible" is generally a question of fact. Courts have already held that whether a particular alternative is "feasible" is reviewed by the substantial evidence test. 19 (Uphold Our Heritage v. Town of Woodside (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 587, 598-99; Center for Biological Diversity v. County of San Bernardino (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 866, 883.) Thus, if a lead agency determines that a particular study or analysis is infeasible, that decision should generally be judged by the substantial evidence standard. However, SCAQMD urges this Court to hold that lead agencies must explain the basis of any determination that a particular analysis is infeasible in the EIR itself. An EIR must discuss information, including issues related to the feasibility of particular analyses "in sufficient detail to enable meaningful participation and criticism by the public. '[W]hatever is required to be considered in an EIR must be in that formal report; what any official might have known from other writings or oral presentations cannot supply what is lacking in the report."' (Laurel Heights I, supra, 47 Cal.3d at p. 405 (quoting Santiago County Water District v. County of Orange (1981) 118 Cal.App.3d 818, 831) ( discussing analysis of alternatives).) The evidence on which the determination is based should also be summarized in the EIR itself, with appropriate citations to reference materials if necessary. Otherwise commenting agencies such as SCAQMD would be forced to guess where the lead agency's evidence might be located, thus thwarting effective public participation. Moreover, if a lead agency determines that a particular study or analysis would not result in reliable or useful information and for that reason is not feasible, that determination should be judged by the substantial evidence test. (See Neighbors for Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority, supra, 57 Cal.4th 439,448,457: 20 whether "existing conditions" baseline would be misleading or uninformative judged by substantial evidence standard. 15) If the lead agency's determination that a particular analysis or study is not feasible is supported by substantial evidence, then the agency has not violated CEQA's information disclosure provisions, since it would be infeasible to provide additional information. This Court's decisions provide precedent for such a result. For example, this Court determined that the issue of whether the EIR should have included a more detailed discussion of future herbicide use was resolved because substantial evidence supported the agency's finding that "the precise parameters of future herbicide use could not be predicted." Ebbetts Pass Forest Watch v. California Dept. of Forestry & Fire Protection (2008) 43 Cal.4th 936, 955. Of course, SCAQMD expects that courts will continue to hold lead agencies to their obligations to consult with, and not to ignore or misrepresent, the views of sister agencies having special expertise in the area of air quality. (Berkeley Keep Jets Over the Bay v. Board of Port Commissioners (2007) 91 Cal.App.4th 1344, 1364 n.11.) In some cases, information provided by such expert agencies may establish that the purported evidence relied on by the lead agency is not in fact "substantial". (Id. at pp. 1369-1371.) In sum, courts retain ultimate responsibility to determine what CEQA requires. However, the law does not require exhaustive analysis, but only what is reasonably feasible. Agencies deserve deference for their factual determinations regarding what type of analysis is reasonably feasible. On the other hand, if a commenter requests more information, and the lead agency declines to provide it but does not determine that the 15 The substantial evidence standard recognizes that the courts "have neither the resources nor the scientific expertise" to weigh conflicting evidence on technical issues. (Laurel Heights I, supra, 47 Cal.3d 376, 393.) 21 requested study or analysis would be infeasible, misleading or uninformative, the question becomes whether the omission of that analysis renders the EIR inadequate to satisfy CEQA's informational purposes. (Id. at pp. 13 70-71.) Again, this is predominantly a question of law and should be judged by the de novo or independent judgment standard of review. Of course, this Court has recognized that a "project opponent or reviewing court can always imagine some additional study or analysis that might provide helpful information. It is not for them to design the EIR. That further study ... might be helpful does not make it necessary." (Laurel Heights I, supra, 47 Cal.3d 376,415 -see also CEQA Guidelines § l 5204(a) [CEQA "does not require a lead agency to conduct every test. .. recommended or demanded by commenters."].) Courts, then, must adjudicate whether an omission of particular information renders an EIR inadequate to serve CEQA's informational purposes.16 16 We recognize that there is case law stating that the substantial evidence standard applies to "challenges to the scope of an EIR's analysis of a topic" as well as the methodology used and the accuracy of the data relied on in the document "because these types of challenges involve factual questions." (Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of Bakersfield, supra, 124 Cal.App.4th 1184, 1198, and cases relied on therein.) However, we interpret this language to refer to situations where the question of the scope of the analysis really is factual-that is, where it involves whether further analysis is feasible, as discussed above. This interpretation is supported by the fact that the Bakersfield court expressly rejected an argument that a claimed "omission of information from the EIR should be treated as inquiries whether there is substantial evidence supporting the decision approving the project. " Bakersfield, supra, 124 Cal.App.4th at p. 1208. And the Bakersfield court ultimately decided that the lead agency must analyze the connection between the identified air pollution impacts and resulting health impacts, even though the EIR already included some discussion of air-pollution-related respiratory illnesses. Bakersfield, supra, 124 Cal.App.4th at p. 1220. Therefore, the court must not have interpreted this question as one of the "scope of the analysis" to be judged by the substantial evidence standard. 22 B. Friant Ranch's Rationale for Rejecting the Independent Judgment Standard of Review is Unsupported by Case Law. In its brief, Friant Ranch makes a distinction between cases where a required CEQA topic is not discussed at all (to be reviewed by independent judgment as a failure to proceed in the manner required by law) and cases where a topic is discussed, but the commenter claims the information provided is insufficient (to be judged by the substantial evidence test). (Opening Brief, pp. 13-17 .) The Court of Appeal recognized these two types of cases, but concluded that both raised questions of law. (Sierra Club v. County of Fresno (2014) 226 Cal.App.4th 704 (superseded by grant of review) 172 Cal.Rptr.3d 271, 290.) We believe the distinction drawn by Friant Ranch is unduly narrow, and inconsistent with cases which have concluded that CEQA documents are insufficient. In many instances, CEQA's requirements are stated broadly, and the courts must interpret the law to determine what level of analysis satisfies CEQA's mandate for providing meaningful information, even though the EIR discusses the issue to some extent. For example, the CEQA Guidelines require discussion of the existing environmental baseline. In County of Amador v. El Dorado County Water Agency (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 931, 954-955, the lead agency had discussed the environmental baseline by describing historic month-end water levels in the affected lakes. However, the court held that this was not an adequate baseline discussion because it failed to discuss the timing and amounts of past actual water releases, to allow comparison with the proposed project. The court evidently applied the independent judgment test to its decision, even though the agency discussed the issue to some extent. 23 Likewise, in Vineyard Area Citizens (2007) 40 Cal.4th 412, this Court addressed the question of whether an EIR's analysis of water supply impacts complied with CEQA. The parties agreed that the EIR was required to analyze the effects of providing water to the development project, "and that in order to do so the EIR had, in some manner, to identify the planned sources of that water." (Vineyard Area Citizens, supra, at p. 428.) However, the parties disagreed as to the level of detail required for this analysis and "what level of uncertainty regarding the availability of water supplies can be tolerated in an EIR .... " (Id.) In other words, the EIR had analyzed water supply impacts for the project, but the petitioner claimed that the analysis was insufficient. This Court noted that neither CEQA's statutory language or the CEQA Guidelines specifically addressed the question of how precisely an EIR must discuss water supply impacts. (Id.) However, it explained that CEQA "states that ' [ w ]hile foreseeing the unforeseeable is not possible, an agency must use its best efforts to find out and disclose all that it reasonably can."' (Id., [Guidelines § 15144].) The Court used this general principle, along with prior precedent, to elucidate four "principles for analytical adequacy" that are necessary in order to satisfy "CEQA's informational purposes." (Vineyard Area Citizens, supra, at p. 430.) The Court did not defer to the agency's determination that the EIR's analysis of water supply impacts was sufficient. Rather, this Court used its independent judgment to determine for itself the level of analysis required to satisfy CEQA's fundamental purposes. (Vineyard Area Citizens, supra, at p. 441: an EIR does not serve its purposes where it neglects to explain likely sources of water and "... leaves long term water supply considerations to later stages of the project.") 24 Similarly, the CEQA Guidelines require an analysis of noise impacts of the project. (Appendix G, "Environmental Checklist Form."17) In Gray v. County of Madera (2008) 167 Cal.App.4th 1099, 1123, the court held that the lead agency's noise impact analysis was inadequate even though it had addressed the issue and concluded that the increase would not be noticeable. If the court had been using the substantial evidence standard, it likely would have upheld this discussion. Therefore, we do not agree that the issue can be resolved on the basis suggested by Friant Ranch, which would apply the substantial evidence standard to every challenge to an analysis that addresses a required CEQA topic. This interpretation would subvert the courts' proper role in interpreting CEQA and determining what the law requires. Nor do we agree that the Court of Appeal in this case violated CEQA's prohibition on courts interpreting its provisions "in a manner which imposes procedural or substantive requirements beyond those explicitly stated in this division or in the state guidelines." (Pub. Resources Code § 21083 .1.) CEQA requires an EIR to describe all significant impacts of the project on the environment. (Pub. Resources Code § 211 00(b )(2); Vineyard Area Citizens, supra, at p. 428.) Human beings are part of the environment, so CEQA requires EIRs to discuss a project's significant impacts on human health. However, except in certain particular circumstances, 18 neither the CEQA statute nor Guidelines specify the precise level of analysis that agencies must undertake to satisfy the law's requirements. (see, e.g., CEQA Guidelines§ 15126.2(a) [EIRs must describe "health and safety problems caused by { a project's} physical changes"].) Accordingly, courts must interpret CEQA as a whole to 17 Association of Environmental Professionals, 2015 CEQA Statute and Guidelines (2015) p.287. 18 E.g., Pub. Resources Code § 21 l 51.8(C)(3)(B)(iii) (requiring specific type of health risk analysis for siting schools). 25 determine whether a particular EIR is sufficient as an informational document. A court determining whether an EIR's discussion of human health impacts is legally sufficient does not constitute imposing a new substantive requirement.19 Under Friant Ranch's theory, the above- referenced cases holding a CEQA analysis inadequate would have violated the law. This is not a reasonable interpretation. IV. COURTS MUST SCRUPULOUSLY ENFORCE THE REQUIREMENTS THAT LEAD AGENCIES CONSULT WITH AND OBTAIN COMMENTS FROM AIR DISTRICTS Courts must "scrupulously enforce" CEQA's legislatively mandated requirements. (Vineyard Area Citizens, supra, 40 Cal.4th 412, 435.) Case law has firmly established that lead agencies must consult with the relevant air pollution control district before conducting an initial study, and must provide the districts with notice of the intention to adopt a negative declaration ( or EIR). (Schenck v. County of Sonoma (2011) 198 Cal.App.4th 949, 958.) As Schenck held, neither publishing the notice nor providing it to the State Clearinghouse was a sufficient substitute for sending notice directly to the air district. (Id.) Rather, courts "must be satisfied that [administrative] agencies have fully complied with the procedural requirements of CEQA, since only in this way can the important public purposes of CEQA be protected from subversion." Schenck, 198 Cal.App.4th at p. 959 (citations omitted).20 19 We submit that Public Resources Code Section 21083.1 was intended to prevent courts from, for example, holding that an agency must analyze economic impacts of a project where there are no resulting environmental impacts (see CEQA Guidelines § 15131) , or imposing new procedural requirements, such as imposing additional public notice requirements not set forth in CEQA or the Guidelines. 20 Lead agencies must consult air districts, as public agencies with jurisdiction by law over resources affected by the project, before releasing an EIR. (Pub. Resources Code§§ 21104(a); 21153.) Moreover, air 26 Lead agencies should be aware, therefore, that failure to properly seek and consider input from the relevant air district constitutes legal error which may jeopardize their project approvals. For example, the court in Fall River Wild Trout Foundation v. County of Shasta, (1999) 70 Cal.App.4th 482, 492 held that the failure to give notice to a trustee agency (Department of Fish and Game) was prejudicial error requiring reversal. The court explained that the lack of notice prevented the Department from providing any response to the CEQA document. (Id. at p. 492.) It therefore prevented relevant information from being presented to the lead agency, which was prejudicial error because it precluded informed decision-making. (Id.)21 districts should be considered "state agencies" for purposes of the requirement to consult with "trustee agencies" as set forth in Public Resources Code§ 20180.3(a). This Court has long ago held that the districts are not mere "local agencies" whose regulations are superseded by those of a state agency regarding matters of statewide concern, but rather have concurrent jurisdiction over such issues. ( Orange County Air Pollution Control District v. Public Util. Com. (1971) 4 Cal.3d 945, 951, 954.) Since air pollution is a matter of statewide concern, Id at 952, air districts should be entitled to trustee agency status in order to ensure that this vital concern is adequately protected during the CEQA process. 21 In Schenck, the court concluded that failure to give notice to the air district was not prejudicial, but this was partly because the trial court had already corrected the error before the case arrived at the Court of Appeal. The trial court issued a writ of mandate requiring the lead agency to give notice to the air district. The air district responded by concurring with the lead agency that air impacts were not significant. (Schenck, 198 Cal.App.4th 949, 960.) We disagree with the Schenck court that the failure to give notice to the air district would not have been prejudicial ( even in the absence of the trial court writ) merely because the lead agency purported to follow the air district's published CEQA guidelines for significance. (Id., 198 Cal.App.4th at p. 960.) In the first place, absent notice to the air district, it is uncertain whether the lead agency properly followed those guidelines. Moreover, it is not realistic to expect that an air district's published guidelines would necessarily fully address all possible air-quality related issues that can arise with a CEQA project, or that those 27 Similarly, lead agencies must obtain additional information requested by expert agencies, including those with jurisdiction by law, if that information is necessary to determine a project's impacts. (Sierra Club v. State Bd. Of Forestry (1994) 7 Cal.4th 1215, 1236-37.) Approving a project without obtaining that information constitutes a failure to proceed in the manner prescribed by CEQA. (Id. at p. 1236.) Moreover, a lead agency can save significant time and money by consulting with the air district early in the process. For example, the lead agency can learn what the air district recommends as an appropriate analysis on the facts of its case, including what kinds of health impacts analysis may be available, and what models are appropriate for use. This saves the lead agency from the need to do its analysis all over again and possibly needing to recirculate the document after errors are corrected, if new significant impacts are identified. (CEQA Guidelines§ 15088.S(a).) At the same time, the air district's expert input can help the lead agency properly determine whether another commenter's request for additional analysis or studies is reasonable or feasible. Finally, the air district can provide input on what mitigation measures would be feasible and effective. Therefore, we suggest that this Court provide guidance to lead agencies reminding them of the importance of consulting with the relevant air districts regarding these issues. Otherwise, their feasibility decisions may be vulnerable to air district evidence that establishes that there is no substantial evidence to support the lead agency decision not to provide specific analysis. (See Berkeley Keep Jets Over the Bay, supra, 91 Cal.App.4th 1344, 1369-1371.) guidelines would necessarily be continually modified to reflect new developments. Therefore we believe that, had the trial court not already ordered the lead agency to obtain the air district's views, the failure to give notice would have been prejudicial, as in Fall River, supra, 70 Cal.App.4th 482,492. 28 CONCLUSION The SCAQMD respectfully requests this Court not to establish a hard-and-fast rule concerning whether CEQA requires a lead agency to correlate identified air quality impacts of a project with resulting health outcomes. Moreover, the question of whether an EIR is "sufficient as an informational document" is a mixed question of fact and law containing two levels of inquiry. Whether a particular proposed analysis is feasible is predominantly a question of fact to be judged by the substantial evidence standard of review. Where the requested analysis is feasible, but the lead agency relies on legal or policy reasons not to provide it, the question of whether the EIR is nevertheless sufficient as an informational document is predominantly a question of law to be judged by the independent judgment standard of review. DATED: April 3, 2015 Respectfully submitted, SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT KURT R. WIESE, GENERAL COUNSEL BARBARA BAIRD, CHIEF DEPUTY COUNSEL By: ~ ~ Barbara Baird Attorneys for Amicus Curiae SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DIST/CT 29 CERTIFICATE OF WORD COUNT Pursuant to Rule 8.520(c)(l) of the California Rules of Court, I hereby certify that this brief contains 8,476 words, including footnotes, but excluding the Application, Table of Contents, Table of Authorities, Certificate of Service, this Certificate of Word Count, and signature blocks. I have relied on the word count of the Microsoft Word Vista program used to prepare this Certificate. DATED: April 3, 2015 Respectfully submitted, ~~ Barbara Baird 1 PROOF OF SERVICE I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, California. I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to the within action. My business address is 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California 91765. On April 3, 2015 I served true copies of the following document(s) described as APPLICATION OF THE SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT FOR LEA VE TO FILE BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF NEITHER PARTY AND {PROPOSED] BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE by placing a true copy of the foregoing document(s) in a sealed envelope addressed as set forth on the attached service list as follows: BY MAIL: I enclosed the document(s) in a sealed envelope or package addressed to the persons at the addresses listed in the Service List and placed the envelope for collection and mailing following our ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar with this District's practice for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, the correspondence would be deposited with the United States Postal Service, with postage thereon fully prepaid at Diamond Bar, California, in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. POS-1 SERVICE LIST James G. Moose, Tiffany K. Wright, Laura M. Harris REMY MOOSE MANLEY, LLP 555 Capitol Mall, Suite 800 Sacramento, CA 9 5 814 Bryan N. Wagner WAGNER & WAGNER 7110 N. Fresno St, Suite 340 Fresno, CA 93 720 Sara Hedgpeth-Harris LAW OFFICE OF SARA HEDGPETH-HARRIS 5445 E. Lane Avenue Fresno, CA 93727 Daniel C. Cederborg Bruce B. Johnson, Jr. Zachary Stephen Redmond OFFICE OF THE FRESNO COUNTY COUNSEL 2220 Tulare Street, Suite 500 Fresno, CA 93 721 Clerk of the Court California Court of Appeal Fifth Appellate District 2424 Ventura Street Fresno, CA 93 721 (via U.S. Mail & Electronic Transmission) Clerk of the Court Superior Court of California County of Fresno 1130 0 Street Fresno, CA 93 721 POS-2 Attorneys for Real Party in Interest and Respondent Friant Ranch, L.P. Attorney for Real Party in Interest and Respondent Friant Ranch, L.P. Attorney for Plaintiffs and Appellants Sierra Club, et al Attorneys for Respondents County of Fresno Fontana Corporate Center Air Quality Impact Analysis 14102-02 AQ Report This page intentionally left blank