Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0850-72_Baseline Avenue/Almeria Avenue - Sewer Project_5.1 (2)CITY OF FONTANA California MEMORANDUM TO: CLIFF STEWART, CENTRAL SERVICES MANAGER FROM: FELIPE MOLINOS, PRINCIPAL ENGINEER M DATE: JULY 25, 1991 RE: JUSTIFICATION FOR SOLE SOURCE ON CONTRACT SERVICES FOR BASELINE/ALMERIA SEWER IN NORTH FONTANA As a result of the need to extend sewer service to the Highland/Haven area, two sewer mains downstream of that area need to be constructed. The engineering firm of Madole and Associates, Inc. prepared plans and specifications for the Baseline Avenue portion of the extension (Beech Avenue to Almeria Avenue). Madole and Associates is also the engineer of record for the Almeria portion of the extension (Baseline Avenue to Walnut Avenue to the easterly boundary of Tract 12314) as part of recorded Tract 12314. We have contacted Madole and Associates to prepare one set of plans and specifications for both portions, since it will go to bid as a single City project. Originally, the Almeria portion was going to be constructed in conjunction with the rest of the sewer for Tract 12314. By using the same engineer to combine the projects we are ensuring that the price to the City is reasonably low, and minimize liabilities in case there are design problems. Madole and Associates will perform the work on a time and materials basis not to exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000). FM:sh cc: R. Weddle, City Engineer •CITY OF FONTANA • CONTRACT FOR SERVICES UNDER $20,000 P.O. # CONTRACT # 17TH THIS CONTRACT made and entered into this day of JULY 91 of 19 by and between MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. , hereinafter called the "CONTRACTOR' and the City of Fontana, hereinafter called the "CITY': WITNESSETH : The parties do hereby contract and agree as follows : 1. The Contractor shall furnish to the City for: $ TIME AND MATERIAL BASIS NOT TO EXCEED FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS , the following : SEE ATTACHED SCOPE OF WORK 2. The term of this contract shall begin JULY 17 , 19 91 and end AUGUST 1 , 19 91 3. Payment to be made upon satisfactory completion and acceptance of work and receipt of invoice, net days. 4. Inspection shall be performed by of the department of the City who shall recommend acceptance to the City Council 5. The contract includes the terms and conditions as printed and set forth on the reverse of this page; and the Contractor, by executing this agreement, agrees to comply with such terms and conditions. 6. The Contractor shall guarantee all labor and materials used in the performance of this contract for a period of days from the date of acceptance by the City. 7. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereunder have subscribed to this agreement, including all contract documents as indicated below : X Specifications/Scope ofWork Statement PER ATTACHED PROPOSAL DATED 7/23/91 X Purchase Order. Number Labor and Materials Release (Must be submitted to City prior to payment) Worker's Compensation (Must be submitted to City prior to commencing work) Liability Insurance Certificates (Must be submitted to City prior to commencing work) Other CONTRACTOR•MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. BY: MILTON MADOLE (Signature) NT- SERVI 4. • AGER ,A' (Name) PRESIDENT (Title) ADDRE �S20 E. 16TH STREET 7�N I A ANA, CAL it- ORN IA 92 7 PHONE:(714)835-2548 LICENSE NUMBER• R.C.E. 14814 8353 SIERRA AVENUE / FONTANA, CA 92335 , Arffm*-- • CLIFF STEWART CITY MANAGER GREG HULSIZER RUSSELL CARLSEN TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. EQUIPMENT AND LABOR: The Contractor shall furnish all tools, equip- ment, apparatus, facilities, transportation, labor and material necessary to furnish the service herein described, the service to be performed at such times and places as directed by and subject to the approval of the authorized City representative indicated in the specifications. 2. SUBCONTRACTORS: Subcontractors, if any, engaged by the Contrac- tor for the service shall be subject to the approval of the City. Contractor shall be held responsible for all operations of subcontractors and shall require them to maintain adequate Worker's Compensation and public liability insurance. 3. DEFAULT BY CONTRACTOR: Failure to comply with any of the terms and/or conditions of this contract shall constitute default by the Contractor. 4. CONTRACT AMENDMENT: No amendment to this Agreement, including changes in the services required, shall be binding unless in writing and signed by both parties. 5. DOCUMENT CONFLICT In case of conflict between specifications and drawings and/or actual site conditions, work shall immediately cease until the conflict is resolved by a City representativew. 6. WORKMEN: (a) Contractor shall at all times enforce strict discipline and good order among his employees and shall not employ any unfit person or anyone not skilled in work assigned to him. (b) Any person in the employ of the Contractor whom the City may deem incompetent or unfit shall be dismissed from work and shall not again be employed except with written consent of the City. 7. SUBSTITUTIONS: No substitutions of materials specified shall be made without the prior approval of the City. 8. CONTRACTOR SUPERVISION: Contractor shall provide competent supervision of personnel employed on the job, use of equipment and quality of workmanship. Contractor guarantees that all work performed under this Agreement shall be done in a good and workmanlike manner that is satisfactory to the City and consistent with applicable standards in the industry. 9. PROTECTION OF WORK AND PROPERTY: The Contractor shall erect and properly maintain at all times, as required by conditions and pro- gress of work, all necessary safeguards, signs, barriers, lights and watch- men for protection of workmen and the public and shall post danger signs warning against hazards created by such features in the course of con- struction. In an emergency affecting life and safety of life or work or of adjoining property, Contractor, without special instruction or authoriza- tion from the City, is hereby permitted to act, at his discretion, to prevent such threatened loss or injury. City representatives may inspect the site at any time and may immediately suspend all work until safety require- ments are met. 10. ACCESS TO WORK: City representatives shall at all times have access to work, wherever it is in preparation or progress. Contractor shall pro- vide safe and proper facilities for such access. 11. ASSIGMENT OF CONTRACT AND/OR PURCHASE ORDER: The Con- tractor shall not assign or transfer by operation of law or otherwise any or all of its rights, burdens, duties or obligations without the prior written consent of the City. 12. FORCE MAJEURE CLAUSE: The parties to the Agreement shall be excused from performance thereunder during the time and to the extent that they are prevented from obtaining, delivering or performing by act of God, fire, strike, loss or shortage of transportation facilities, lock -out, commandeering of materials, products, plants or facilities by the govern- ment, when satisfactory evidence thereof is presented to the City, pro- vided that it is satisfactorily established that the non-performance is not due to the fault or neglect of the party not performing. 13. HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSE: The Contractor shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend, at the contractor's expense, the City and its of- ficers, agents, and employees from and against any and all liability, judg- ments, costs, damages, claims, losses, demands, causes of action, and expenses, of any nature whatsoever, including attorneys' fees, resulting from or attributable to any act, omission, negligence, or breach of this Agreement by the contractor or his officers, agents, employees, indepen- dent contractors, or subcontractors. Such indemnification shall cover death or bodily injury to any person; injury to, loss, or theft of property; injury arising from the furnishing or use of any copyrighted or uncopy- righted composition, secret process, or patented or unpatented inven- tion; or any other type of injury, whether such injury or damage occurs on or off city property. 14. INSURANCE: The Contractor shall maintain adequate insurance to pro- tect him from claims under Worker's Compensation Acts, and from claims or damages from personal injury, including death, and damage to pro- perty, which may arise from operations under the contract. The supplier may be required to file with the City, certificates of insurance. Failure to furnish such evidence, if required, may be considered default of the Contractor. 15. PAYMENT: Unless otherwise specified, the Contractor shall render in- voices in duplicate for materials delivered or services performed under the contract. The City shall make payment for materials, supplies, or other services supplied under this contract within a reasonable and proper time after acceptance thereof by the authorized City representative. 16. PERMITS AND LICENSES: The Contractor and all of his employees or agents shall secure and maintain in force such licenses and permits as are required by law, in connection with the furnishing of materials, sup- plies or services herein listed. 17. CONTRACTOR NOT OFFICER, EMPLOYEE OR AGENT OF CITY: While engaged in carrying out the terms and conditions of the contract, the Contractor is an independent contractor, and not an officer, employee or agent of the City. 18. ANTI -DISCRIMINATION: Contractor shall comply with all applicable California and federal laws prohibiting discrimination in employment and shall not discriminate against persons because of the race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, medical condi- tion, marital status, or sex of such persons, except as provided in Sec- tion 12940 of the Government Code. Contractor shall require such com- pliance by all subcontractors hired by him under this Agreement. 19. LABOR CODE: Contractor shall comply with the appliable provisions of the Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Ch. 1, Articles 1-5, including the pay- ment of the general prevailing rates. Copies of the prevailing rate per diem wages are on file in the City's Purchasing Office. Contractor shall maintain for audit by the City, certified payroll records applicable to this contract, starting wage rates, trades, payments made, and employee signatures. Copies of these records shall be furnished to the City upon request. 20. CLEAN-UP: Debris shall be removed from the premises. Job site shall be free from debris at all times when work is not actually being performed. 21. TERMINATION: The contract may be terminated by either party upon 30 days notice given in writing by one party to the other. Both parties will perform in accordance with the contract prior to the effective termina- tion date. Nothing contained herein shall diminish the right of the City to cancel, immediately and without prior notice, the contract for cause without penalty or liability on the part of the City. 22. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This contract constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties concerning the subject matter hereof and supersedes all agreements, representations, statements, promises, and understand- ings, whether oral or written, with respect to the subject matter hereof. CITY OF FONTANA • CONTRACT FOR SERVICES UNDER $20,000 P.O. # CONTRACT # THIS CONTRACT made and entered into this 17TH day of JULY of1991 by and between MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES , I N C . , hereinafter called the "CONTRACTOR' and the City of Fontana, hereinafter called the "CITY': WITNESSETH : The parties do hereby contract and agree as follows : 1. Thi Ci_tractorDshall furnish to the City for: $ I ME AND MATERIAL BASIS NOT TO EXCEED FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARtt�efollowing :. SEE ATTACHED SCOPE OF WORK 2. The term of this contract shall begin JIJI Y •17 , 19 91 and end AUGUST 1 , 19 91 . 3. Payment to be made upon satisfactory completion and acceptance of work and receipt of invoice, net days. 4. Inspection shall be performed by of the department of the City who shall recommend acceptance to the City Council 5. The contract includes the terms and conditions as printed and set forth on the reverse of this page; and the Contractor, by executing this agreement, agrees to comply with such terms and conditions. 6. The Contractor shall guarantee all labor and materials used in the performance of this contract for a period of days from the date of acceptance by the City. 7. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereunder have subscribed to this agreement, including all contract documents as indicated below : X Specifications✓ScopeofWorkStatementPER ATTACHED PROPOSAL DATED 7/23/91 X Purchase Order Number Labor and Materials Release (Must be submitted to City prior to payment) Workers Compensation (Must be submitted to City prior to commencing work) Liability Insurance Certificates (Must be submitted to City prior to commencing work) Other CONTRACTOR• MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. BY: (Signature) MILTON MADOLE PRESIDENT (Name) (Title) ADDRESS: 1820 E. 16TH STREET PHONE• SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 (714)835-2548 LICENSE NUMBER • R.C.E. 14814 8353 SIERRA AVENUE / FONTANA, CA 92335 SE = MANAGER CLIFF STEWART DEP 'TMEN C EAD GREG HUZS.1ZER CITY MANAGER RUSSELL CARLSEN TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. EQUIPMENT AND LABOR: The Contractor shall furnish all tools, equip- ment, apparatus, facilities, transportation, labor and material necessary to furnish the service herein described, the service to be performed at such times and places as directed by and subject to the approval of the authorized City representative indicated in the specifications. 2. SUBCONTRACTORS: Subcontractors, if any, engaged by the Contrac- tor for the service shall be subject to the approval of the City. Contractor shall be held responsible for all operations of subcontractors and shall require them to maintain adequate Worker's Compensation and public liability insurance. 3. DEFAULT BY CONTRACTOR: Failure to comply with any of the terms and/or conditions of this contract shall constitute default by the Contractor. 4. CONTRACT AMENDMENT: No amendment to this Agreement, including changes in the services required, shall be binding unless in writing and signed by both parties. 5. DOCUMENT CONFLICT: In case of conflict between specifications and drawings and/or actual site conditions, work shall immediately cease until the conflict is resolved by a City representativew. 6. WORKMEN: (a) Contractor shall at all times enforce strict discipline and good order among his employees and shall not employ any unfit person or anyone not skilled in work assigned to him. (b) Any person in the employ of the Contractor whom the City may deem incompetent or unfit shall be dismissed from work and shall not again be employed except with written consent of the City. 7. SUBSTITUTIONS: No substitutions of materials specified shall be made without the prior approval of the City. 8. CONTRACTOR SUPERVISION: Contractor shall provide competent supervision of personnel employed on the job, use of equipment and quality of workmanship. Contractor guarantees that all work performed under this Agreement shall be done in a good and workmanlike manner that is satisfactory to the City and consistent with applicable standards in the industry. 9. PROTECTION OF WORK AND PROPERTY: The Contractor shall erect and properly maintain at all times, as required by conditions and pro- gress of work, all necessary safeguards, signs, barriers, lights and watch- men for protection of workmen and the public and shall post danger signs warning against hazards created by such features in the course of con- struction. In an emergency affecting life and safety of life or work or of adjoining property, Contractor, without special instruction or authoriza- tion from the City, is hereby permitted to act, at his discretion, to prevent such threatened loss or injury. City representatives may inspect the site at any time and may immediately suspend all work until safety require- ments are met. 10. ACCESS TO WORK: City representatives shall at all times have access to work, wherever it is in preparation or progress. Contractor shall pro- vide safe and proper facilities for such access. 11. ASSIGMENT OF CONTRACT AND/OR PURCHASE ORDER: The Con- tractor shall not assign or transfer by operation of law or otherwise any or all of its rights, burdens, duties or obligations without the prior written consent of the City. 12. FORCE MAJEURE CLAUSE: The parties to the Agreement shall be excused from performance thereunder during the time and to the extent that they are prevented from obtaining, delivering or performing by act of God, fire, strike, loss or shortage of transportation facilities, lock -out, commandeering of materials, products, plants or facilities by the govern- ment, when satisfactory evidence thereof is presented to the City, pro- vided that it is satisfactorily established that the non-performance is not due to the fault or neglect of the party not performing. 13. HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSE: The Contractor shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend, at the contractor's expense, the City and its of- ficers, agents, and employees from and against any and all liability, judg- ments, costs, damages, claims, losses, demands, causes of action, and expenses, of any nature whatsoever, including attorneys' fees, resulting from or attributable to any act, omission, negligence, or breach of this Agreement by the contractor or his officers, agents, employees, indepen- dent contractors, or subcontractors. Such indemnification shall cover death or bodily injury to any person; injury to, loss, or theft of property; injury arising from the furnishing or use of any copyrighted or uncopy- righted composition, secret process, or patented or unpatented inven- tion; or any other type of injury, whether such injury or damage occurs on or off city property. 14. INSURANCE: The Contractor shall maintain adequate insurance to pro- tect him from claims under Worker's Compensation Acts, and from claims or damages from personal injury, including death, and damage to pro- perty, which may arise from operations under the contract. The supplier may be required to file with the City, certificates of insurance. Failure to furnish such evidence, if required, may be considered default of the Contractor. 15. PAYMENT Unless otherwise specified, the Contractor shall render in- voices in duplicate for materials delivered or services performed under the contract. The City shall make payment for materials, supplies, or other services supplied under this contract within a reasonable and proper time after acceptance thereof by the authorized City representative. 16. PERMITS AND LICENSES: The Contractor and all of his employees or agents shall secure and maintain in force such licenses and permits as are required by law, in connection with the furnishing of materials, sup- plies or services herein listed. 17. CONTRACTOR NOT OFFICER, EMPLOYEE OR AGENT OF CITY: While engaged in carrying out the terms and conditions of the contract, the Contractor is an independent contractor, and not an officer, employee or agent of the City. 18. ANTI -DISCRIMINATION: Contractor shall comply with all applicable California and federal laws prohibiting discrimination in employment and shall not discriminate against persons because of the race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, medical condi- tion, marital status, or sex of such persons, except as provided in Sec- tion 12940 of the Government Code. Contractor shall require such com- pliance by all subcontractors hired by him under this Agreement. 19. LABOR CODE: Contractor shall comply with the appliable provisions of the Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Ch. 1, Articles 1-5, including the pay- ment of the general prevailing rates. Copies of the prevailing rate per diem wages are on file in the City's Purchasing Office. Contractor shall maintain for audit by the City, certified payroll records applicable to this contract, starting wage rates, trades, payments made, and employee signatures. Copies of these records shall be furnished to the City upon request. 20. CLEAN-UP: Debris shall be removed from the premises. Job site shall be free from debris at all times when work is not actually being performed. 21. TERMINATION: The contract may be terminated by either party upon 30 days notice given in writing by one party to the other. Both parties will perform in accordance with the contract prior to the effective termina- tion date. Nothing contained herein shall diminish the right of the City to cancel, immediately and without prior notice, the contract for cause without penalty or liability on the part of the City. 22. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This contract constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties concerning the subject matter hereof and supersedes all agreements, representations, statements, promises, and understand- ings, whether oral or written, with respect to the subject matter hereof. • • CITY OF FONTANA California MEMORANDUM TO: GREG BUCKNELL, PRINCIPAL CIVIL ENGINEER - SPECIAL PROJECTS FROM: BOB MEDDLE, CITY ENGINEER zleiU,W DATE: JULY 19, 1991 RE: PROJECT DOCUMENTS This is to request that you have Yousuf Patanwala provide a separate copy of the following to Felipe Molinos and me. If it can be done today, it would be appreciated. 1. Foothill/Beech Sewer Environmental Documents 2. Foothill/Beech Sewer Council Reports a. Authorization to Bid b. Certification of Environmental Documents c. Award of Construction Contract d. Final Acceptance of Construction Contract e. Utility Notification Letters and Summary Tracking Form 3. Foothill/Beech consultant contract for soils testing for design report and construction monitoring; include a copy of Request for Proposal 4. Full set of bid plans and specifications 5. Latest update of specifications - probably in your CFD program These documents will allow me to review/process the many capital projects that will be going to bid in the next few months. RWW:sh cc:_F. Molinos - Y. Patanwala • MA?J0i_E&ASSOCIATES , INC TEI.•o .7148350612 Jul 8:51 No.002 P.01 rrt MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Civil Engineering, Land Planning and Surveying 1820 EAST SIXTEENTH STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 FAX -COVER SHEET DATE; ?""ems/ 1714)835.2848 FAX # 711+-835-0612 To: F / MA /,Y S / G/t #P /7NT,PN01 FROM; 11/911°, 141W7 MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. -66147 SUBJECTSAgjeWitg / Sri/ 774.G//✓/e SOW0g. TOTAL NUMBER,OF PAGES BEING SENT Z (INCLUDES THIS PAGE) car 4xwe4-frec-i/0/497-AW Gy9/j'66s IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL OF THESE PAGES, PLEASE CALL RACK AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO OFFICE SENDING INFORMATION. THANK YOU AAP 1$15- d4 a), /ifs su s 4 aim ce7C. w/c. i 6 if any ,, •,J/r.,•G, rOr6`• d -r l'/G7- a'i1" &Po NW TMS (VPO I � swift fl D Yam' /1/I 4 M lefL PR rn - rnq ' — T//'?6 /n/rp [S M'7 To r fr 50 ego , W G T f f /YEP d0 s- G'o�rr% G?' ? /°G 41.5E c w r 93r ors-'-71/11 tJ/ i L_ owdzedApe- - "or .(.14/ 4101 ilfe. I - OLfr pi elAteWtzeo - • "--EP4V-1 f,167 /71./ ----IN/40-,--F-sehl---97 • • • $-4/61-i• • • • • 10/149$ Won71----planoy---Ag## • • ----JAVV- ifrio • • --- • • 40- nvocr yfr eliorreffey,7j/kse ?”--1--Afg/A00 tow' -7' • "LL:,;64-2/ • WM/ cP raf/- -frg• -9,/zziliveki • .y forp V41iRe 7;47-A4W 9._ 44 76/ Mop (9/1-Ai .1V1P4 70141/ okei zw1-470 6-smot-4-7- .......„.....„......•..••.•••• •• ••.• • uthar •:tray ,4/011 447000 -eptimpairlst- -7k 0/ tWAtir4t - - - - - r#01.1-2Petioo S461 • -me- tpf 64/1/10/2111Wd/v0-A - .9,0vezookt/ 49/27020e0P .0/1/7 000- 4.7/P Afte z z woo ay- - 0,0101/.45-V .4547, 040/444? ZO'd ZOO' oN IS:8 ilk Inc ZI90S2817i2: 00131 DNI `SHUDOSSLI'83 100W • /306 laecAiee. s /- 7C7 /23/9 w4d 7- /7-9/ ay-4- s/ /.9h G✓. T.�:y-e ,1, • �. r 1s:- 7 / 9/LL/NG TO: MIOLE AND ASSOCIATES, I. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING AND SURVEYING 1820 EAST SIXTEENTH STREET, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701; (714) 835-2548 CITY OF FONTANA DATE: 3/24/92 ATTN: MR. FELIPE i1OLINOS, PRINCIPLE, C.E. PERIOD FROM:1/5/92 - 2/29/92 BASELINE AVENUE! ALMERIA AVENUE INVOICE NO. 16100R J.N. 539-1343X DESCRIPTION TRUNK SEWER FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED: EXTRA: EXTRA TO CONTRACT (J.N. 539-1343X.1, CITY PURCHASE ORDER NO. 023284) AS REQUESTED BY FELIPE MOLINOS ON JANUARY 28, 1992. THE SCOPE OF WORK INCLUDES: 1. MODIFICATIONS TO PLANS RESULTING IN THE DECISION BY THE CITY OF FONTANA TO DELETE THE TEMPORARY ACCESS ROAD. 2. VARIOUS MISCELLANEOUS ADDITIONS AND CHANGES REQUESTED BY VARIOUS CITY STAFF. 3. PREPARE A NEW SET OF SPECIFICATIONS UTILIZING NEW "BOILER PLATE" FORMAT AND INCORPORATE CHANGES NOTED IN ITEMS 1 AND 2 ABOVE. 4. TELEPHONE CONVERSATION AND PROCESSING WITH CITY STAFF. OFFICE TECHNICAL PERSONNEL: DESIGN: 42.0 HRS. @ $82.00/HR. _ $ 3,444.00 DRAFTING: 29..5HRS. @ $56.00/HR. _ $ 1,652.00 SUBTOTAL $ 5,096.00 MINUS PORTION LEFT IN BUDGET - 928.00 (SEE INVOICE NO. 16086) TOTAL DUE AND PAYABLE $ 4,168.00 THIS INVOICE VOIDS AND SUPERCEDES INVOICE NO'S. 16031 AND 16100. MA•OLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. _ CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1 i LAND PLANNING AND SURVEYING CITY ENGigJEER S i FFC 1820 EAST SIXTEENTH STREET, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701; (714) 835-2548 TO: ATTN: INVOICE NO. CITY OF FONTANA 3/04/92 DATE: MR. FELIPPE MOLENA, PRINCIPLE, C.E. 1/5/92 - 2/29/92 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS PERIOD FROM: BASE LINE AVENUE/ 16100 539-1343X ALMERIA AVENUE J.N. DESCRIPTION: TRUNK SEWER FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED: EXTRA: EXTRA TO CONTRACT REVISE PLANS PER CHANGE IN CONCEPT REVISE SPECIFICATIONS PER CHANGE IN CITY'S FORMAT REVISE ALMERIA SEWER TO CONFORM TO RDA OFFICE TECHNICAL PERSONNEL: DESIGN: 42.0 HRS. 0 $82.00/HR. = $ 3444.00 DRAFTING: 29.5 HRS. @ $56.00/HR. = $ 1652.00 TOTAL = $ 5096.00 MINUS PORTION LEFT IN CONTRACT = $ 928.00 TOTAL DUE AND PAYABLE = $ 4168.00 THIS INVOICE VOIDS INVOICE #16031 DATED 2/06/92 A •AND ASSOCIATES,INC. M DOLE CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING AND SURVEYING 1820 EAST SIXTEENTH STREET, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701; (714) 835-2548 TO: CITY OF FONTANA ATTN: INVOICE NO. DATE: 3/03/92 MR. FELIPE MOLINOS PERIOD FROM: 1/5/92 - 2/29/92 BASELINE AVENUE 16086 J.N. 539-1343X.1 DESCRIPTION: & At,MF.RZA AVENUE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED: CONTRACT PERCENT ITEM NO. AMOUNT COMPLETE TOTAL DUE Y.U. 4 023284 PREVIOUS DUE THIS BILLING BILLING OFFICE: 1. 5844.00 80 4675.20 4675.20 2. 3208.00 100 3208.00 2566.40 3. 656.00 100 656.00 524.80 4. 776.00 100 776.00 620.80 5. 0.00 0.00 6. 0.00 0.00 7. 0.00 0.00 8. 0.00 0.00 9. 0.00 0.00 10. 0.00 0.00 FIELD: 9315.20 8387.20 1. 3552.00 100 3552.00 3552.00 2. 0.00 0.00 3. 0.00 0.00 4. 0.00 0.00 5. 0.00 0.00 6. 0.00 0.00 7. 0.00 0.00 8. 0.00 0.00 9. 0.00 0.00 10. 0.00 0.00 3552.00 0.00 641.60 131.20 155.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 928.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3552.00 0.00 TOTAL DUE AND PAYABLE = 928.00 MOLE AND ASSOCIATES, I. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING AND SURVEYING 1820 EAST SIXTEENTH STREET, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701; (714) 835-2548 TO: CITY OF FONTANA - DATE: 2/06/92 ATTN: MR. FILIPPE MOLENA, PRINCIPLE, C.E. PERIOD FROM: 1/5/92 - 2/01/92 DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS INVOICE NO. J . N. DESCRIPTION: BASE LINE AVENUE/ 16031 539 1343X ALMERIA AVEr'fli FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED: TRUNK SEWER EXTRA EXTRA TO CONTRACT - NOT COMPLETE REVISE PLAN PER CHANGE IN CONCEPT REVISE SPECIFICATIONS PER CHANGE IN CITYS FORMAT OFFICE TECHNICAL PERSONNEL: DESIGN: 5.5 HRS. B $82.00/HR _ $ 451.00 DRAFTING: 1.5 HRS. @ $56.00/HR. _ $ 84.00 TOTAL DUE AND PAYABLE $ 535.00 VENDOR 0 P.O.lO.R.#. PARTIAL _ ,. FE'i!EW _ COMPLETE MOLE AND ASSOCIATES, IS. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING AND SURVEYING 1820 EAST SIXTEENTH STREET, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701; (714) 835-2548 TO: ATTN: INVOICE NO. CITY OF FONTANA 10/14/91 DATE: MR. FELIPE MOLINOS 9/15/91 - PERIOD FROM: 10/12/91 BASELINE AVENUE & 15786 J.N. N. 539-1343X.1 DESCRIPTION ALMERIA AVENUE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED: VEER I P.C. l O.R. l► CONTRACT PERCENT ITEM NO. AMOUNT COMPLETE TOTAL DUE PREVIOUS DUE THIS BILLING BILLING OFFICE: 1. 5844.00 80 4675.20 0.00 2. 3208.00 80 2566.40 0.00 3. 656.00 80 524.80 0.00 4. 776.00 80 620.80. 0.00 5. 0.00 0.00 6. 0.00 0.00 7. 0.00 0.00 8. 0.00 0.00 9. 0.00 0.00 10. 0.00 0.00 8387.20 FIELD: 1. 3552.00 100 3552.00 2. 0.00 3. 0.00 4. 0.00 5. 0.00 6. 0.00 7. 0.00 8. 0.00 9. 0.00 10. 0.00 ?m,TJ1;, E x:mot..:, -11.. 1 ._- -r.pas.4 A:.. =r1 imam /v 3552.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4675.20 2566.40 524.80 620.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8387.20 3552.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3552.00 TOTAL DUE AND PAYABLE = 11939.20 9/9/ orVi 1-0 01c Fd MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Civil Engineering, Land Planning and Surveying 1820 EAST SIXTEENTH STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 (714) 835-2548 FAX (714) 835-0612 SEPTEMBER 13, 1991 J.N. 539-1343X.1 CITY OF FONTANA 8353 SIERRA AVENUE FONTANA, CALIFORNIA 92334-0518 ATTENTION: MR. FELIPE MOLINOS SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSISTANT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SUBJECT REF: BASE LINE AVENUE AND ALMERIA AVENUE TRUNK SEWER Dear Mr. Molinos: As per your meeting with Milt Madole and subsequent communi- cation, we are pleased to submit for your consideration a proposal for certain office and field engineering for the above referenced project. Following are Exhibits A, B, and C, which along with this letter constitutes Madole and Associates, Inc.'s proposal. We would propose to perform the work for a fee of $14,036.00 in accordance with Exhibit B. Work uncompleted as of August 1, 1992, would be escalated in accordance with industry wide increases at that time. As has been our practice in the past, invoices would be sent every four (4) weeks for that portion of the work performed during the immediate past four (4) week period. Unless we hear contrary within fifteen (15) days of date of invoice, we will assume that the invoice is acceptable and will be put in line for payment and that payment will be made no later than thirty (30) days after date of invoice. This proposal will remain valid until September 23, 1991 when it will become null and void if not accepted before that time. We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal to you. Should you wish us to proceed with the work, a signed Purchase Order is all we need to commence. Very truly yours, MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ' Jim Dahlquist Vice President JRD: srl CITY OF FONTANA DATE • • EXHIBIT A ENGINEER will complete the following tasks: OFFICE: 1. Prepare a 40 scale temporary detour road plan. The plans will be drawn on standard 24" x 36" mylar sheets with City of Fontana title block information. A title sheet will be included. The plan will consist of plan view data only (no profile). It will show the precise alignment and construction of the proposed temporary detour roadway. Included in the data will be existing spot elevations at approximately 50 feet spacing, with shots 50 feet north and 50 feet south of the centerline. Vertical grades will be shown along the centerline only on the plan view. The plans will include pertinent data at the join points at Base Line Avenue. Typical sections, quantities and constructions notes will be shown. 2. Prepare easement deeds for the various parcels affected by the temporary detour road. Included in the scope of this work will be all communication with Chicago Title Company, review of present title description, vesting, deed preparation including legal description. Not included in this work will be work necessary to obtain the owners signature. Also not included will be the cost of preliminary title reports or title policies. 3. Prepare an easement deed for the "Almeria Avenue alignment". This deed will include a strip of land, 60 feet, extending from Base Line Avenue to the easterly boundary line of Tract No. 12314 at its northerly terminus. 4. Minor modifications to the specifications as identified by the City of Fontana as well as minor modifications to the Base Line Avenue Trunk Sewer Plans. (Note - "minor modifications" are defined as those corrections and/or revisions which would require less than twelve (12) hours total to complete.) FIELD: 1. All field survey work required for determination of existing ground elevations along the temporary detour road. Elevations will be at approximately 50 foot intervals and will extend 50 feet north and 50 feet south of the proposed road centerline. Also included will be tree location, fence location, utility pole location and other topographic features crossing the temporary detour road. • ITEM OF WORK EXHIBIT B DESCRIPTION COST OFFICE 1. TEMPORARY DETOUR ROAD PLAN 2. EASEMENT DEEDS 3. ALMERIA AVENUE EASEMENT DEED $ 5,844.00 3,208.00 656.00 4. MINOR MODIFICATION TO SPECIFICATION AND BASE LINE AVENUE TRUNK SEWER PLAN 776.00 FIELD 1. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYING OFFICE SUBTOTAL $ 10,484.00 GRAND TOTAL $ 3,552.00 $ 14,036.00 • EXHIBIT C STANDARD BILLING RATES FOR TIME AND MATERIALS EXTRA WORK AND OUTSIDE SERVICES The DEVELOPER agrees to pay ENGINEER as compensation for all authorized or additional work heretofore stated, at the hourly rates set forth below. All such extra or additional work must be authorized by DEVELOPER in writing to ENGINEER prior to commencement of such extra work by ,authorized agent for DEVELOPER. OFFICE OFFICE TECHNICAL PERSONNEL: DESIGNER - $ 82.00 PER HOUR DRAFTER - $ 56.00 PER HOUR FIELD TWO MAN SURVEY CREW - $ 148.00 PER HOUR OUTSIDE SERVICES DEVELOPER shall premiums, title and reproductions pay the costs of all agency fees, permits, bond company charges, delivery charges, blueprints and all other outside charges and expenses. CITY OF FONTANA California MENORAIDIRI TO: GREG HULSIZER, COIMRNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR FROM: BOB WEDDLE, CITY ENGINEER RE: CITY/PRESLEY SEWER REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT DATE: MARCH 16, 1992 Enclosed for your review and comment is the first draft sewer reimbursement agreement between the City and Presley of Southern California for the Baseline and Almeria sewers. These sewers are necessary to serve the City's Highland/Haven project and Presley's Tract No. 12314. The map exhibit and cost figures will be added later. Upon receipt of your comments, the agreement will be forwarded to the City Attorney's office for review prior to submitting to Presley. This agreement was based upon one developed by the City Attorney's office some years ago. RWW:sh Enclosure cc: Redevelopment/Housing Manager Principal Civil Engineer/Capital Improvements • MASTER PLAN SEWER SYSTEM REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT THIS Agreement is made and entered into this day •of , 1992, by and between the City of Fontana ("City"), a municipal corporation, and Presley of Southern California ("Developer"), a California Corporation. RECITALS WHEREAS, Developer owns certain real property known as Tract No. 12314, and Tract No. 10800, located within the City (the "Tract(s)"); and WHEREAS, City as a part of the Master Plan of Sewers Capital Improvement Program (CIP) has planned and budgeted the construction of the Baseline Sewer from the current terminus of the Master Plan of Sewer System at Baseline Avenue at Beech Avenue, within Baseline Avenue to Almeria Avenue; and WHEREAS, Developer desires to design, construct and install an extension of City's sewer master plan system for the purpose of providing sewer services to the Tract(s); and WHEREAS, City and Developer's sewer projects are jointly referred to herein as "Project"; and WHEREAS, Develler as a part of the develop it of Tract(s) is required to construct Master Plan of Sewers within and adjacent to said tract(s) and said construction as a part of the Master Plan of Sewer system will benefit others; and WHEREAS, Developer and City recognize that it is in their mutual interest to coordinate the design, construction and installation of "Project" to serve the City's Master Plan System and the Tract(s) so as to efficiently implement City's overall master plan for sewers and to avoid duplication of facilities; and WHEREAS, Developer's required construction of master plan of sewer facilities provides supplemental capacity for others, thereby benefiting other lands; and WHEREAS, Section 26- et.seq., of the Fontana Municipal Code provides that the City may enter into an Agreement to reimburse a Developer who constructs sewer pipe greater than eight inches (8") in inside diameter and appurtenant structures of a size and/or construction greater than that minimally required of a standard local sewer system, and that such reimbursement may be made from the sewer connection fees paid by such other persons; and WHEREAS, Developer has planned to construct the sewer lines for Tract(s) and subsequently be reimbursed from City's sewer fund; and WHEREAS, Developer's construction of sewers for Tract(s) is on hold P pending City's implementation of a North Fontana Infrastructure Program with commensurate financing program; and WHEREAS, City proposes to construct two of the three master planned sewer line segments of Project as noted herein in order to provide Master Plan of Sewer facilities to that area of land known as the Highland/Haven tract; and WHEREAS, Developer acknowledges its responsibility for repayment to City for constructing those facilities required by Tract(s) that are part of a standard local sewer system. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the City of Fontana and Developer hereby agree as follows: Agreement 1. Master Plan of Sewers Project 1.01 The Master Plan of Sewers Project to be constructed shall be divided into three segments as follows and as delineated in "Exhibit A•: 1. Segment 1: Baseline Avenue, Beech Avenue to Almeria Avenue 2. Segment 2: Almeria Avenue, Baseline Avenue to Walnut Avenue (Highland/Haven) 3. Segment 3: Baseline Avenue, Almeria Avenue to east boundary of Tract No. 12314 1.02 Develop, has commenced design upon alkhree segments of project; however the funding responsibility is as follows: City Developer 1. Segment 1: 100.0% 0.0% 2. Segment 2: Upsizing cost Local system cost 3. Segment 3: Upsizing cost Local system cost 1.03 City shall complete design of Segment 1 and 2 upon execution of this Agreement and shall award a contract for construction of sewers for Segment 1 and 2 to the lowest responsible bidder after execution of this Agreement. 1.04 Developer shall complete design of Segment 3 upon execution of this Agreement and shall award a contract for construction of sewers for Segment 3 to the lowest responsible bidder after execution of this Agreement, but no later than prior to issuance of the first building permit for Tract No. 12314 (Recorded 12-10-90). 1.05 City and Developer for their respective sewer segment projects shall be solely responsible for securing appropriate bids and awarding the contract for construction of the sewer segments in compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws. 1.06 Developer shall defend, indemnify and hold City free and harmless from any and all claims, actions or liability whatsoever, including attorney's fees arising out of or in connection with • Developer's securing of bids and award and performance of the contract for the construction of sewer Segment 3. 1.07 City shall defend, indemnify, and hold Developer free and harmless from any and all claims, actions or liability whatsoever, including attorney's fees, arising out of or in connection with City's securing of bids and award and performance of the construction of sewer Segments 1 and 2. 1.08 City and Developer shall have the right at all times to inspect the construction of either entity's construction project to ensure conformity with plans and specifications. 2. Costs of Construction 2.01 Developer's and City's engineers have estimated that the total costs of the design, construction and inspection of the sewer project and that the proportionate share of such estimated cost is: City's Developer's Total Construction Share Share Cost Authority Segment 1 0.00 City Segment 2 City Segment 3 Developer Exhibit "B" attached hereto provides a detailed cost breakdown. The maximum reimbursement available to Developer for construction of project is $ , unless City, by action of the City Council, approves a higher amount. • 2.02 For the City bid project, City will require progress reports and billings from the contractor performing construction of Segments 1 and 2 of Project. Upon receipt of such progress reports and billings, City shall be solely responsible for determining their accuracy. 2.03 For the Developer bid project, Developer will require progress reports and billings from the •contractor performing construction of Segment 3 of Project. Upon receipt of such progress reports and billings, Developer shall be solely responsible for determining their accuracy. 3. Terms of Reimbursement 3.01 City shall pay to Developer the actual costs for Segment 3's proportionate share as noted in Section 2.01 within thirty (30) days following the recording of the notice of completion and submittal of an itemized bill for costs incurred. 3.02 Developer shall pay to City the actual costs for Segment 2's proportionate share, less design funds advanced for Segment 1, as noted in Section 2.01 and Exhibit "B" within thirty (30) days following the recording of the notice of completion or prior to issuance of the first building permit for Tract No. 12314, whichever is the latter date. City shall provide the developer an itemized bill for costs incurred. 4. Indemnification Insurance 4.01 Developer shall defend, indemnify and hold City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents free and harmless from any and all liability from loss, damage, or injury to or death of persons or property in any manner arising out of or incident to Developer's performance of this Agreement, including without limitation all consequent damages and attorney's fees, whether or not resulting from the negligence of Developer or Developer's agents. This indemnity shall not extend to any claim arising out of the sole negligence of the City. 4.02 Developer shall obtain, at its own cost, a policy or policies of liability insurance of the type and in the amounts described below and satisfactory to the City Attorney. Such policies signed by a person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its behalf must be filed with the City prior to exercising any right or performing and construction work pursuant to this Agreement. Except for worker's compensation, City, its elected officials, officers, and employees shall be added as insured on all policies required under this Agreement. Developer's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects City, its elected officials, officers, and employees. Any insurance of self-insurance maintained by, City, its elected officials, officers, and employees shall be excess of Developer's insurance and not contribute to it. 4.02.1 Prior to commencing any construction work hereunder, Developer shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements, and copies of policies, if requested, of the following insurance with Bests' Class B or better carrier: a. Worker's Compensation Insurance covering all employees and principals of Developer, in at least the minimum amount as required by state law, effective under the laws of the State of California. b. Commercial General Liability Insurance covering third party liability risks, including contractual liability, in a minimum amount of $ combined single limt per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. If commercial general liability insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate shall apply separately to Developer's Segment 3 of Project or the general limit shall be twice the occurrence. c. Commercial Auto Liability and Property Insurance covering any owned and rented vehicles of Developer in the minimum amount of combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damages. 4.02.2 Said policy or policies shall be endorsed to state that overage shall be suspended, voided, cancelled by either party, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days prior notice has been given in writing to City. Developer shall give to City prompt and timely notice of any claim made or suit instituted arising out of Developer's operations hereunder. Developer shall also procure and maintain, at its own expense, any additional kinds and amounts of insurance which in its own judgement may be necessary for its proper protection in the prosecution of the work. 4.02.3 illeveloper shall include alfil contractors and subcontractors as insured under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements each contractor or subcontractor prior to commencing any work unto this. Agreement. All coverages for such contractors and subcontractors shall conform with the insurance requirements stated herein. 4.03 The contract documents prepared by Developer and submitted to City for its approval shall also require Developer's contractor to provide City with a Payment Bond and a Performance Bond each in an amount equal to the total contract amount for Segment 3 of Project to be constructed in accordance with this Agreement to guarantee: (1) that contractor and its subcontractors of every tier will pay all amounts owed to subcontractors, material suppliers, workers and equipment renters and, (2) that contractor will perform all obligations under this Agreement. The bonds shall be furnished by a surety company satisfactory to City on forms acceptable to City, and shall name City and Developer jointly as obligees. A surety company, to be acceptable to the City, must be authorized to do business and have an agent for service of process in California. City must also be satisfied that the surety company has sufficient assets and net worth to honor the Payment and Performance Bond. If at any time, a surety on such bond is declared a bankrupt, loses its right to do business in the State of California for any reason, or is removed from the list of surety companies accepted on federal bonds, Developer's contract with its contractor shall require the con ractor within thirty (30) days after notice from City, to substitute acceptable bonds in such form and sum and signed by such other surety or sureties as may be satisfactory to City, in its sole discretion. All premiums on any performance or payment bonds required by this Agreement shall be paid solely by Developer or its contractor. The Performance and Payment Bond shall remain in effect for a period of one year after the City Council has accepted the project to secure Developer's guarantee covenant, and the City may draw on the bond during said time to satisfy Developer's said covenant. Developer's contract with its contractor shall provide that in the event of termination or cancellation of any insurance or security required by the contract, the contractor shall have fifteen (15) calendar days following receipt of written notice from either City or Developer to provide replacement insurance or security which satisfies the requirements of the contract; and that failure to provide such replacement insurance or security shall constitute a material breach of the contract and shall entitle Developer to make alternative arrangements for completion of performance. In the event that City provides the fifteen (15) day written notice, a duplicate copy of the notice shall be provided to Developer. Upon expiration of said fifteen (15) day period, Developer shall have an additional period of thirty (30) calendar days to engage the services of an alternate contractor, who shall obtain such insurance and security to complete construction of Segment 3 of Project. • Failure of the Developer to engage the services of an alternate contractor within said thirty (30) day period to complete construction of Segment 3 of Project shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement entitling City to unilaterally terminate this Agreement and pursue such other legal remedies as may be available. 4.04 City shall defend, indemnify and hold Developer, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any and all liability from loss, damage or injury to or death of persons or property in any manner arising out of or incident to City's performance of this Agreement, including without limitation all consequential damages and attorney's fees, whether or not resulting from the negligence of City or City's agents. This indemnity shall extend to any claims arising because City has failed to secure any necessary easement, land right, contract, and approval, but shall not extend to any claim arising out of the sole negligence of the Developer. 4.05 Developer acknowledges City will surplus excavated earth material from construction of Segment 1 and 2 of the Project at the agreed upon location within Tract No. 12314, pursuant to the applicable Codes of City and City shall defend, indemnify and hold Developer harmless from any and all liability from loss, damages or injury to or death of persons or property in any manner arising out of or incident to City's contractor placing the uncompacted excavated earth material on Developer's property, including without limitation all consequential damages and attorney's fees, whether or • • not resulting from the negligence of the City or City's agents or contractors. Such material shall become the property of Developer upon completion of work. 5. Commencement of Construction and Inspection Developer shall not permit its contractor to commence construction of Segment 3 of Project, until Developer has received written authorization from the City Engineer or designee to proceed. All work performed on Segment 3 of Project shall be done in strict compliance with the approved plans, specifications and contract documents and in a good and workmanlike manner. All work performed by Developer's contractors or agents to construct Segment 3 of Project shall be subject to inspection by City's designated representatives, and the Developer shall require its contractor or agents to comply with all instructions given by City's representatives during construction of the work. All fees and costs to construct Segment 3 of Project that are not delineated in the cost breakdown pursuant to Section 2.01 of said Agreement shall be borne solely by Developer. Inspection by City shall not relieve Developer of its liability for design defects or improper or inadequate workmanship. 6. Compliance with Applicable Law Developer shall insure that all work performed on Segment 3 of Project is performed in a manner which complies with all applicable federal, statecounty and local government AI, regulations and rules, including all rules and regulations of City, as these rules and regulations may be modified or changed from time to time including awarding work to the lowest responsible bidder. 7. Prevailing Wages Developer is alerted to the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1770 et seq., which would require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements if it were determined that Developer's contract with its contractor to construct Segment 3 of Project were a public works contract. Developer agrees to hold City and its officers, employees and agents harmless from any claims of liability including attorney's fees, arising from any failure or alleged failure to comply with these provisions of the Labor Code. Developer to provide proof of prevailing wage compliance upon written request by City. 8. Contractor Licenses All work performed on Segment 3. of Project shall be done only by contractors licensed to perform the type of work required in the State of California. In accordance with Business and Professions Code Section 7059(b), City shall determine the license classifications necessary to perform the work. Developer shall not permit any work to be performed until Developer has obtained these license classifications from City, and until Developer has secured a contractor or contractors meeting these license requirements. 9. Acceptance of Work Upon completion of Segment 3 of Project to the satisfaction of City, Segment 3 of Project shall be presented to City Council for acceptance, and for authorization to file a Notice of Completion. City Council will accept Segment 3 of Project if City determines that Segment 3 of Project was constructed in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and contract documents and if all other requirements of this Agreement have been satisfied. Upon acceptance of Segment 3 of Project, Developer shall assign to City all of Developer's rights and remedies, including warranties, as set forth in the approved contract documents and thereafter City shall have the same recourse under said contract documents that City would have had if City itself had engaged Developer's contractor to construct the work. 10. Liability for Work Prior to Formal Acceptance Until the City Council has formally accepted the work performed for Segment 3 of Project in accordance with this Agreement, Developer shall be solely responsible for all damages to the work, regardless of cause, and for all damages or injuries to any person or property at the work site, except damage or injury due to the sole active negligence of City, its agents or employees. 11. Guarantee Developer shall guarantee all work and materials for Segment 3 of Project to be free from all defects due to faulty materials or workmanship for a period of one (1) year after the date of formal acceptance of the work by City. Developer shall repair or remove and replace any and all such work, together with any other work which may be displaced in so doing, that is found to be defective in workmanship or materials within the one (1) year period, without any expense whatsoever to City, ordinary wear and tear excepted. In the event Developer fails to comply with the above -mentioned provisions within one (1) week after being notified in writing, City shall be authorized to proceed to have the defects remedied and made good at the sole cost and expense of Developer, who shall be contractually bound to pay the costs and charges therefore immediately upon demand. Such action by City will not relieve Developer of the guarantee required by this Section. This Section shall not, in any way, limit the liability of Developer or any other party for any design or construction defects in the work subsequently discovered by City. 12. Record Drawings Prior to acceptance of the work by the City Council, Developer shall update the original drawings on file with City to "Record Drawing" status via Developer's licensed civil engineer who along with Developer shall acknowledge the accuracy and completeness of these • drawings. Developer shall be solely responsible and liable for insuring the completeness and accuracy of the record drawings. 13. Ownership of Work From and after acceptance of Segment 3 of Project by formal action of the City Council, ownership of work shall belong exclusively to City. 14. Approval of Sewer Costs Upon completion of all three segments of Project and final acceptance of Project, Developer shall, within thirty (30) days provide City with an itemized bill showing all reasonable fees and costs incurred by Developer to design Segment 1 and 2 and to design and construct Segment 3 of Project, including but not limited to, all costs referred to in this Agreement as being borne solely by Developer. Such reasonable costs shall be limited to the costs of acquiring necessary land and easements, administrative expenses associated with Project, permit fees, and any other associated costs directly and necessarily related to the design and construction of the work excluding the costs of borrowed funds and bonding costs. Developer agrees to provide City with monthly cost bills evidencing costs incurred. Developer also agrees to provide City with any additional information as to any items shown on the cost bill as requested by City's representative from time to time. Following completion of the analysis, City shall advise Developer in writing W • • of any fees or costs shown on the cost bill that City will disallow and the reason why these items are being disallowed by City. Only those design and construction costs approved by City, in its sole discretion, will be allowed for reimbursement in accordance with this Agreement. Upon completion and acceptance of Segments 1 and 2 of Project, City shall within thirty (30) days provide Developer with an itemized bill showing all costs and fees for City to complete design and to construct Segments 1 and 2 of Project, including but not limited to, all costs referred to in this Agreement as being borne solely by City. Such reasonable costs shall be limited to costs of acquiring necessary land and easements, administrative expenses associated with Segments 1 and 2 of Project, permit fees and any other associated costs directly and necessarily related to the design and construction of the work. City agrees to provide Developer with access during normal business hours to review City's cost records. City agrees to provide Developer with all reasonable information so as to assign costs to the work. Following completion of Developer's review of City's costs and cost, records, Developer shall advise City, in writing, of any fees or costs that Developer disagrees with and the reasons why these items are being challenged by Developer. Only those final design and construction costs that City at its reasonable discretion will be the final amount Developer reimburses City in accordance with this Agreement. • • 17. Termination In the event that the Developer defaults in the performance of any of its obligations under this Agreement, or materially breaches any of the provisions of this Agreement, City shall have the option to terminate this Agreement upon written notice to Developer. 18. Notice All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be deemed made when delivered to the applicable party's representative as provided in this Agreement. Such notices shall be mailed or otherwise delivered to the addresses set forth below, or at such other addresses as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose: City City Manager City of Fontana P. 0. Box 518 Fontana, CA 92334-0158 Developer Presley of Southern California Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage, prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. • • 19. Term This Agreement shall be set for a term of ten (10) years from and after the date of its execution. City shall have no obligation whatsoever to Developer upon expiration of the term of this Agreement. 20. Attorney's Fees In the event any action is commenced to .enforce or interpret any term or condition of this Agreement, in addition to costs and any other relief, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees. 21. Entire Agreement This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties hereto with respect to the matters contained herein. 22. Assignment This Agreement shall not be assigned without the written consent of the parties hereto, and any assignment without consent shall be void and ineffective. • • WHEREFORE, this Agreement is executed this day of , 1992. READ AND APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND CONTENT: Clark Alsop or Stephen P. Deitsch City Attorney This document is the true and complete document approved by City Council on , 1992. Linda S. Nunn Deputy City Clerk, Greg Hulsizer Community Development Director Jennifer Vaughn Blakely Compliance Officer Michael Sokol Risk Management CITY OF FONTANA Presley of Southern California A Municipal Corporation Jay M. Corey City Manager ATTEST: Name Title Notary Kathy Montoya Name City Clerk • EXHIBIT 'A' PROJECT MAP EXHIBIT 'B' Engineer's cost estimates City and Developer are responsible for each segment of Project. • 7Cr iz3/9 Attf /IAA -Sous. 72Lve /lha4 /I /E4,2?-- 3711-we 1144.441.t...„ 464ee. As*. Avitaw- ;ss4.414 t%44, &.g,:44 42t4, oc,o 460020 AA.Or etit44144", 4e/41 ,ided xr. t /74%4.e :/?e-2 7s„."420` 2,e02121;31.- inksze.A- alov CyR 2? 4 ity e A. catowl-1 _C h' 44, A 7,1,42e1- yfreeraa APve ; 44st- eave-e-eS3 ex"- it.41,1.- de. 420 0. si/04/ /4x2-74 ,t,d / 6 - - „ 4 „ 4,.e..eas 104— 4.r.s A d tJ ,042..../ • is,1•44e. , • • r lip,„„, 1144,L pegia;reed / tLIt„01,L t44,14,7 7 - it Rie 4-1 4g f• #4,0a 214 /3,24Le Rta. go. Pre-Lv-He71.s e., ------ Ae„--- a W Ree,:4.4444.5.tAkAau-f 7& ,iYe w,a nev/Aeki-- /7,4 si9.4 /;.-6-6:•/ /a-p4-14- th4.4.944:. /3004, 1,t;t.,G StAkzo- 604 ga.e A,tie sta.- itA41.1 pu.s.e • • 41- 44,ze /34ge- / AG /9 2 {�Gl fyN U/YAN Sj-ypv jj/v-Es 64-2 c4 2e7, /`9/ L.7 /(-447 26 l l✓ Gt f,Z tr2-/ ,3 wE-,v/, / — fl/I' .0 y.d 4'o.,s 1./%(Z• /2L M a f /iGt - t 'J/ti, ,7F civ-t W504 - a,�o1 ,t,L,, os_7.4-t_ _ /-, = s /lea II • Ao6 6),W :4-„ -60 Ade iJ%e , ,e 7/1-4s /155.`4,2'= f ems) 4dded I od 2 4 3 _p/2 s Ter / 3 9 2 8 - jz, G • cam..- /mauve l'ke 19,2Je1 , a ba.� A oo.Aow e d ) o /t,Nx tom' (444- h 742,_ ce_ - h, .r- Act-- 6 - sue aLe.,ea4L Vc P e..011 ..ea41- /19-ek-e iae's% /9/ .0/)/ s,Z,-10/ %ie a- �' , ^~e ° .w.,or.,et� S / .ti oay . S c't . Sa -, e cv /.,( / e,e !//6..-e-n . e7-2- -3/'34 /g u ,,/,r s• Ii �P,1 9., /61d: ,Va i4,...4.,kn,F/,2c�//J,__ •_ S f 1/1-4 fwuc s s crG 4111 - r sC p_ �. ..� ems• It u f ratat,vv S 462, dz.- CZ- 1 1 1 5 d4') A^^-411 GrPt-A, 4.41 /3 tJ S. ,4- Mgt" G.r/ w 2 4.4.e-5 c . ��1� /2� w, • CITY OF FONTANA California MEMORANDUM TO: ROBERT V. WEDDLE CITY ENGINEER FROM: WILMA PINSAK ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST I RE: STATUS OF AGENDA ITEMS FOR COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRIJARY 18, 1992; PROPOSED ITEMS; AND LIST OF ITEMS WHICH HAVE BEEN PREPARED AND ARE ON HOLD DATE: JANUARY 30, 1992 Two of Engineering's agenda items have been prepared, reviewed and approved by you, and are with Greg Hulsizer for review. They are: L� 1. Use of Diamond Grade, Non -Illuminated Mast -Arm -Mounted Street Name C Signs; and y1,4 Public Works Mutual Aid Agreement. One item has been prepared and is being reviewed by Ken Jeske and you. It is: 1�,� 3. Y' In -House Transfer of Equipment Mechanic II to Engineering Technician II Position in Special Projects. I am updating the following item on which you have made changes, and I am then holding it until we receive the City Attorney's response: 4. Request by John Boruchin for Waiver of Posting of Bonds or Equivalent Securities Prior to Issuance of Construction Permits for Design Review 86-100 and Related Work on Jurupa, Hemlock and Beech Avenues. I am holding the following item waiting for your corrections: 5. NBS/Lowry°- Cypress Sewer Consultant Services Agreement Increase. I have prepared the following item for Ken Jeske which he is submitting for review andsignatures: r 6. Cooperative Equipment Sharing Agreement (I included this item because I thought you might be interested in the fact that he is r• planning to nit at the same time we are1lanning to submit Carlos's P.N. Mutual Aid Agreement.) ,/Lv Richard Cota's group thinks that they may have one item ready for me by L' Friday, January 31st -- Final Acceptance of a Tract Map Ken Jeske's group has one and possible two items on which they are working for the February 18th agenda. Greg Bucknell says that he plans to try to get back to the item he did a couple of meetings ago and then pulled -- Increase in the Amount of the Agreement with Arrowhead Development in Relation to Empire Center. I am working on one item to possibly be placed on the March 3rd agenda: 1. Request to Refund Money Deposited for Street Improvements on Citrus Avenue between Miller and Baseline. c>'n Four items which were prepared during the past four months, but which were submitted to others for review or are on hold at the moment are: Updating the City Subdivision Agreement and Related Security Bonds and Changes in Landscape Maintenance Districts' Bonding, Maintenance Turn Over Procedures, and Financing Procedures; Sewer Line Construction in Elm Avenue from Santa Ana Avenue to Stover Avenue and on Santa Ana Avenue from Hemlock Avenue to Approximately 980 Feet East - Environmental Document Approval Storm Drain Cost Reimbursement to Mr. John Boruchin, Jurupa Industrial Park (SWIP) - Santa Ana at Poplar Intersection. (Given to Don Gee for consideration of payment from RDA funds) Authorization to Advertise for Bids for the Construction of Sewer Trunk Line on Baseline Avenue from Beech Avenue to Almeria and North on Almeria Avenue to Walnut. (Felipe's item which I understand we are holding for required easements) ,� � y Presley of Southern California ATTN: Alan D. Uman 19 Corporate Plaza Newport Beach, California 92660 January 29, 1992 CRAFT RE: Tract Map No. 12314 - Permission to disperse excess dirt from Almeria Avenue within their boundary. Dear Mr. Uman: The City of Fontana is proposing to construct the sewer main line on Almeria Avenue within the limits of the above mentioned recorded tract map. In following local Building and Safety laws in dispersing excess dirt within your site, the City requests your permission to do such work. The City Engineering Department coordinating the grading work within Almeria Avenue and dispersing the excess dirt outside of Almeria Avenue within your site will do as follows: 1. Adjust the cross-section on Almeria to generate approxiately 4900 cubic yards (by raising the cut line cross-section and manhole rim as necessary to acquire the above mentioned cubic yard amount). 2. The existing natural drainage of the site will not be blocked or altered as a result of the dispersing of the excess dirt. 3. The approximate 4900 cubic yards will be dispersed over an area approximately AC at a slope. 4. As the completion of the dispersing of the excess dirt is completed, a hydroseed spraying will be done as a measure for dust control. Please confirm your agreement with the foregoing, by signing below and returning this original to the City at your earliest convenience. Sincerely yours, Community Development Department Engineering Division Richard R. Cota, P.E. Principal Civil Engineer RRC:EIC/cye I AM IN AGREEMENT PRESLEY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CITY OF FONTANA Robert W. Weddle, P.E. City Engineer cc: A. Shipper F. Molinos CITY 517 FONTANA • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, CA 92335 TO: MADOLE & ASSOCIATES 1820 East 16th Street Santa Ana, CA 92701 ATTN: Jim Dahlguist Gentlemen: We are sending you: IXI Attached the following item: • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL File: Almeria Trunk Sewer Date: January 24. 1992 RE: Almeria & Walnut Easement I I Under separate cover via I I Drawings I I Prints I I Plans I 1 Copy of Letter 1 1 Change Order 1 1 Other: I I Samples I 1 Specifications 1 I Check Print(s) 1 1 Studies COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 Original Easement Deed w/Plat Nurpose• For your information/records For approval I I Approved as submitted X For your use IXI Approved as noted As requested 1 1 Returned for corrections For review & comment 1 1 Other For bid due: , 19 Please: IX! Submit original executed. I I Resubmit copies for approval. 1 1 Submit copies for distribution 1 1 Return corrected prints I I Other Prints returned after loaned to: Remarks: Please sign and stamp. both the legal description and the deed plat. Copy to: Felipe Molinos Signed: Title: icardo Sandoa Assistant Engineer RECORDING REQUESTED BY CITY OF FONTANA WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY OF FONTANA P.O. BOX 518 FONTANA, CA 92334 ATTN: ENGINEERING DIVISION APN - NONE (ALMERIA AVENUE AND WALNUT ADDRESS - N/A BUILDING PERMIT - ALMERIA AVENUE TRUNK SEWER STREET) DOCUMENTARY TAX DUE: NONE BY: EASEMENT DEED THE PRESLEY COMPANIES, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, FORMERLY KNOWN AS PRESLEY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION (Grantors) FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, acknowledged does hereby grant to Municipal Corporation, an easement public utility purposes over, under, in the City of Fontana, County of California, described as follows: receipt of which is hereby the CITY ....-.OF-- FONTANA, a for street, highway and and upon the real property San Bernardino, State of PARCEL 1: THAT PORTION OF TRACT NO. 12314 IN THE CITY OF FONTANA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON MAP BOOK 240, PAGES 3 TO 10 INCLUSIVE, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, INCLUDED WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 64.00 FEET WIDE, THE CENTERLINE, OF SAID STRIP BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF BASELINE AVENUE AND ALMERIA AVENUE (EXTENDING NORTH), SAID INTERSECTION BEING DISTANT NORTH 89 52'57" EAST 628.64 FEET FROM THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF ALMERIA AVENUE AS FOLLOWS: SHEET 1 OF 6 -2- NORTH 0 04'58" WEST 660.29 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 750.00 FEET; NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8 58'39" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 117.52 FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 750.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE OF SAID REVERSE CURVE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 81 06'19" EAST; NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8 59'40" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 117.74 FEET; TANGENT TO SAID CURVE, NORTH 0 05'59" WEST 691.87 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 250.00 FEET; NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 41 45'49" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 182.23 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF ALMERIA AVENUE (EXTENDING NORTHWESTERLY) AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP OF TRACT NO. 12314, SAID INTERSECTION HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT "A"; THENCE CONTINUING NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID LAST MENTIONED CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8 34'10" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 37.39 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT "B", A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 39 46'00" WEST. THE SIDE LINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND SHALL BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE SOUTHERLY IN THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 30.00 FEET, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 36 AND NORTHERLY IN A LINE WHICH BEARS NORTH 39 46'00" WEST AND WHICH PASSES THROUGH POINT "B" HEREINBEFORE DESCRIBED. PARCEL 2: THAT PORTION OF TRACT NO. 12314, IN THE CITY OF FONTANA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS SHOWN ON MAP BOOK 240, PAGES 3 TO 10 INCLUSIVE, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, INCLUDED WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 50.00 FEET WIDE, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT POINT "A" HEREINBEFORE DESCRIBED IN PARCEL 1; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF ALMERIA AVENUE AS FOLLOWS: NORTH 48 20'10" WEST 134.17 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 250.00 FEET; NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 48 15'12" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 210.54 FEET; TANGENT TO SAID CURVE, NORTH 0 04'58" WEST 469.37 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF WALNUT STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP OF TRACT NO. 12314, SAID INTERSECTION HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT "C". SHEET 2 OF 6 -3- THE SIDE LINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND SHALL BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE SOUTHERLY IN THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 1 HEREINBEFORE DESCRIBED AND. NORTHERLY IN A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT SOUTHERLY 30.00 FEET, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM A LINE WHICH BEARS NORTH 89 51'00" EAST AND WHICH PASSES THROUGH POINT "C" HEREINBEFORE DESCRIBED. PARCEL 3: THAT PORTION OF TRACT NO. 12314, IN THE CITY OF FONTANA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS SHOWN ON MAP BOOK 240, PAGES 3 TO 10 INCLUSIVE, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, INCLUDED WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 60.00 FEET WIDE, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT POINT "C" HEREINBEFORE DESCRIBED IN PARCEL 2; THENCE ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF WALNUT STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP, SOUTH 89 51'00" WEST 45.05 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT "D", SAID POINT "D" BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF WALNUT STREET, NORTH 89 51'00" EAST 180.05 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 12314. THE SIDE LINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND ARE TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE WESTERLY IN A LINE WHICH BEARS NORTH 0 09'00" WEST AND WHICH PASSES THROUGH POINT "D" HEREINBEFORE DESCRIBED AND EASTERLY IN SAID EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 12314. Said described parcels are as shown on "Exhibit A", Sheets 5 & 6 Dated this day of , 19 THE PRESLEY COMPANIES, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, FORMERLY KNOWN AS PRESLEY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION BY: BY: SHEET 3 OF 6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF -4- S.S. On before me PERSONALLY APPEARED personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/ her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (SEAL) This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the deed or grant dated from THE PRESLEY COMPANIES, A CALIFORNIA CORPORA- TION, FORMERLY KNOWN AS PRESLEY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, A CALIFORNIA CORPOR- ATION to the City of Fontana, California, a Municipal Corpora- tion, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer pursuant to authority conferred by resolution of the City Council adopted on July 16, 1991;and the grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. CITY OF FONTANA BY: Robert W. Weddle, P.E. City Engineer SHEET 4 OF 6 City Parcel No. PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: I `p.4.4 I .M. MADOLE R.CE.14814 DATE ND 40 ��9�c/ PP if= B°5d39. ,e•7saco' r-65.et5, PARCEL SE 1/4 SEC. 36, TIN R6W, S.B.M. 5� cae„</.6 s:C.3ro, I TA/. i dA,,/ y89 52 b7ifl C ALMERIA AVE. (S) SEE SHEET 6 EXHIBIT 'A' CITY OF FONTANA. CALIFORNIA t d\23'4 24O /310 r a "syAo" I . a7' /1774' w Cr W 2 -J PO. B.. PARCEL 1 PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND PLANNERS 1520 E. 15Ih Street SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 PHONE 714,1M-264S C BASELINE AVENUE Approved SHEETS OF 6 Parcel No. DEED PLAT .11 • 6Lrr. L /ic/E TR NO. /rs/ PARCEL 3 TRUE PO.B. PARCEL, 3� POINT D 581* 5/'00V 45.06 A/0'oy ate ";�/�`'• PARCEL 2 / d - 1D'/5 22' R=t.50.a?' b = 2/0.54' A/16 '20'10 / 123140 3 _ 10 T- //7 97 ' I /S /7' 2 d = b'j42.0" A = E50. co' No. \�.._I� .-a707' fief Si bo",e- /e0 05' PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF MAO®LE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND PLANNERS 1130 E.1Sth street SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA NMI PHONE 714 • swam Q WALNUT STREET POINT'C I PARCEL 3 ALMERIA AVE.(N) a -IV 45W" =25.0CX L`162.25' T= p5.57' SE 1/4 T N' PARCEL.1 1V EXHIBIT "A" SEE SHEET 5 POINT" B POINT'A'; PO.B. PARCEL 2 SEC. 36 R 6W s B ` ALMERIA` AVt: (N) SHEET 6 OF 6 CITY OF FONTANA. CALIFORNIA DEED PLAT Approved .19 Parcel No. Drawn B7; CITY OF FONTANA • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, CA 92335 TO: MADOLE & ASSOCIATES 1820 East 16th Street Santa Ana. CA 92701 ATTN: Jim Dahlquist Gentlemen: We are sending you: IXI Attached the following item: 0 LETTER OF"TRANSMITTA L File: Almeria Trunk Sewer Date: January 24. 1992 RE: Almeria & Walnut Easement 1 1 Under separate cover via I I Drawings I I Prints I I Plans I I Samples 11 Specifications I I Copy of Letter I I Change Order 1 I Other: I I Check Print(s) I I Studies COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 Original Easement Deed w/Plat Nurpose:, For your information/records For approval I I Approved as submitted X For your use IXI Approved as noted As requested I I Returned for corrections For review & comment I I Other For bid due: , 19 Please: IXI Submit original executed. I I Resubmit copies for approval. 1 1 Submit copies for distribution I.I Return corrected prints I 1 Other Prints returned after loaned to: Remarks: Please sign and stamp, both the legal description and the deed plat. Copy to: Felipe Molinos Signed: T� Title: Ricardo Sando a Assistant Engineer CITY OF FONTANA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, CA 92335 TO: MADOLE & ASSOCIATES 1820 East 16th Street Santa Ana. CA 92701 ATTN: Jim Dahlquist Gentlemen: We are sending you: the following item: IXI Attached LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL File: Almeria Trunk Sewer Date: January 24. 1992 RE: Almeria & Walnut Easement I I Under separate cover via I I Drawings I I Prints I I Plans I I Samples I I Specifications I I Copy of Letter I I Change Order I I Other: I I Check Print(s) I .I Studies COPIES DATE NO. 1 DESCRIPTION Original Easement Deed wJPlat Nurpose:, For your information/records For approval I I Approved as submitted X For your use IXI Approved as noted As requested I I Returned for corrections For review & comment I I Other For bid due: , 19 Please: IXI Submit original executed. 1 I Resubmit copies for approval. I I Submit copies for distribution I I Return corrected prints I I Other Prints returned after loaned to: Remarks: Please sign and stamp. both the legal description and the deed plat. Copy to: Felipe Molinos Signed: Title: icardo Sando a Assistant Engineer City of Fontana C ALIFORNIA January 14, 1992 Don Allen Traffic Operations Electrical State of California Department of Transportation District 08 P. 0. Box 231 San Bernardino, CA 92402 RE: Traffic Detour for Baseline/Almeria Sewer Project Dear Don: The City is planning to construct in early spring of 1992 a sewer main line on Baseline Avenue from Beech to Almeria Avenue and on Almeria Avenue from Baseline to Walnut Avenue. Enclosed for your review is a copy of the initial study and detour route planned. We will submit a detailed plan for the proper signing and traffic control at the time we request an encroachment permit. If you have any questions, please contact John Tesley at 714-350-6642. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Engineering Division Felipe Molinos, P.E. Principal Engineer/Capital Projects FM:sh Enclosure. cc: Clyde Sweet, Jr., City Traffic Engineer 8353 SIERRA AVENUE (P.O. BOX 518) • FONTANA, CALIFORNIA 92334-0518 • (714) 350-7600 SISTER CITY - KAMLOOPS, B.C. CANADA Stv)e()ILIE/At.i\-1 114 A 3E0g1/ l'Fizojecr (iCLICAL GOMSPOLI%Oc r(1, q/or1 6942TOF/peo..JEL-[ f4-tai [2151p1- 10. CITY OF FONTANA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, CA 92335 TO: MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES. INC. 1820 East Sixteenth Street Santa Ana. CA 92701 ATTN: Mr. James Madole LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL File: Date: RE: Tract 12314 October 22. 1991 Street & Utilities Easement For Almeria Avenue Gentlemen: We are sending you: IXI Attached I I Under separate cover via the following item: I I Drawings I I Prints I I Plans I I Samples I I Specifications I I Copy of Letter I I Change Order IXI Check Print(s) I I Studies I I Other: COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION Street Easement Check Print Purpose: For your information/records For approval I I Approved as submitted For your use I I Approved as noted As requested I I Returned for corrections For review & comment I I Other For bid due: , 19 Please: I I Submit original IXI Resubmit 2 copies for gowygy check. I I Submit _ copies for distribution I Return _ corrected prints I I Other Prints returned after loaned to: Remarks: A 15 ft. wide strip. (a portion of the parcel 1 to be dedicated) within the property .lust west of Tract 12314. If this portion is also to be dedicated. please modify the "That Portion° paragraph so as to inidicate said strip. If you may have any questions or need additional information. please call Ricardo Sandoval at (714) 350-6655. Copy to: Richard Cote. P.E. Signed: ��-06 5/.1,it rl4 , Title: !ssistant Engineer ROUTI .. - REQUEST PIaaN ❑ READ ❑ HANDLE ❑ APPROVE and Wi FORWARD ❑ RETURN O KEEP OR DISCARD O REVIEW WITH ME Data 1 0(1`)j From AS SIXTEENTH STREET -- RECORDING REQUESTED BY CITY OF FONTANA WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY OF FONTANA P.O. BOX 518 FONTANA, CA 92334 ATTN: ENGINEERING DIVISION APN - NO E AND WALNUT STREET) ADDRESS - N/A BUILDING PERMIT - ALMERIA AVENUE TR SEWER DOCUMENTARY TAX DUE: NONE BY: EASEMENT DEED THE PRESLEY COMPANIES, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, FORMERLY KNOWN AS PRESLEY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION (Grantors) FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant to the CITY OF FONTANA, a Municipal Corporation, an easement for street, highway and public utility purposes over, under, and upon the real property in the City of Fontana, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as follows: PARCEL 1: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36,_ TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN; IN THE CITY OF FONTANA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT OF SAID LAND; BEING A PORTION OF TRACT NO. 12314 AS SHOWN ON MAP BOOK 240, PAGES 3 TO 10 INCLUSIVE, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, INCLUDED WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 64.00 FEET WIDE, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF BASELINE AVENUE AND ALMERIA AVENUE (EXTENDING�DRTH), SAID INTERSECTION BEING DISTANT NORTH 89 52'57" EAST 628.64 FEET FROM THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 36; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF ALMERIA AVENUE AS FOLLOWS: SHEET I OF 6 -2- NORTH 0 04'58" WEST 660.29 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 750.00 FEET; ,,.,- NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE/ THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8 58'39 ' AN ARC DISTANCE OF 117.52-FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 750.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE OF SAID REVERSE CURVE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 81 06'19" EAST; NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8 59'40" AN ARRCS'ANCE OF 117.74 FEET; TANGENT TO SAID CURVE, NORTH 0 05'5 WEST 691.87-'s FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 250.00 FEET; NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 41 45'4R". AN ARC DISTANCE OF 182.23 —FEET TO TEE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF ALMERIA- AVENUE (EXTENDING NORTHWESTERLY) AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP OF TRACT NO. 12314, SAID INTERSECTION HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT "A"; THENCE CONTINUING NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID LAST MENTIONED CURVE _THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8 34,'10' AN ARC DISTANCE OF 37.39 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT "B", A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 39 4 6' 00 " WEST. THE SIDE LINES OP SAID STRIP OF LAND3�L BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE SOUTHERLY,- THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 30.00 FEET, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 36 AND NORTHERLY IN A LINE WHICH BEARS NORTH.39 46'00" WEST AND WHICH PASSES THROUGH POINT "B" HEREINBEFORE DESCRIBED. - j,,1 - n r-� , j PARCEL 2 0 THAT PORTION OF TRACT NO. 12314, IN THE CITY OF FONTANA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS SHOWN ON MAP BOOK 2407 PAGES 3-10 INerI SIVE, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, INCLUDED WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND SEET WIDE, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT POINT "A" HEREINBEFORE DESCRIBED IN PARCEL 1; THENCE ALONG SAID CTERL E OF ALMERIA AVENUE AS FOLLOWS: NORTH 48 20'10" WEST 134. FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGEN VE CONCAVE NORTHEASTE AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.0,0 FEET; NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 48�' 15' 12 ", -AN ARC DISTANCE OF 210. 54—FAT; TANGENT TO SAID CURVE, NORTH 0 04 ' 58 " WEST 4 69.3 7c-1EET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF WALNUT STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP OF TRACT -NO. 123I4, SAID INTERSECTION HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT "C". SHEET 2 OF 6 -3- THE SIDE LINES OF SAID STRIP OF SHALL BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE SOUTHERLY N THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE PARCEL 1, HEREINBEFORE DESCRIBE AND NORTHERLY IN A LINE ARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT SOUTHERLY 30.'00 FEET, MEASURE AT IGHT ANGLES, FROM A LINE WHICH BEARS NORTH 89 51'00" EAST AND . WHICH PASSES THROUGH POINT "C" HEREINBEFORE DESCRIBE" PARCEL 3: THAT PORTION OF TRACT NO. 12314, IN THE CITY OF FONTANA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS SHOWN ON MAP BOOK 240, PAGES 3 TO 10 INCLUSIVE, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, INCLUDED WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 60.00 FEET WIDE, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT POINT "C" HEREINBEFORE DESCRIBED IN PARCEL 2; THENCE ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF WADINUT STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP, SOUTH 89 51'00" WEST 45.05 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT "D", SAID POINT "D" BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF WALNUT STREET, NORTH 89 51'00" EAST 180.05 /FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 12314. THE SIDE LINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND ARE TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE WESTERLY IN A LINE WHICH BEARS NORTH 0 09'00" WEST WHICH PASSES THROUGH POINT "D" HEREINBEFORE DESCRIBED AND EASTERLY IN SAID EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 12314. Said described parcels are as shown on "Exhibit A", Sheets 5 & 6 Dated this day of , 19 THE PRESLEY COMPANIES, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, FORMERLY KNOWN AS PRESLEY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION BY: BY: SHEET 3 OF 6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF -4- S.S. On before me PERSONALLY APPEARED personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/ Cher/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity. upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (SEAL) This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the deed or grant dated from THE PRESLEY COMPANIES, A CALIFORNIA CORPORA- TION, FORMERLY KNOWN AS PRESLEY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, A CALIFORNIA CORPOR- ATION to the City of Fontana, California, a Municipal Corpora- tion, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer pursuant to authority conferred by resolution of the City Council adopted on July 16, 1991;and the grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. CITY OF FONTANA BY: Robert W. Weddle, P.E. City Engineer SHEET 4 OF 6 City Parcel No. ELyL«2/ PARCEL 3 TRUE PO.B. PARCE1 3 POINT • D" r 5675/O+ON/ 45. , r No°o9� PARCEL 2 d - 48°/522/ h . 2/O.5¢' r•/!%97' 1 R. M g- No fn A/e9 s/ co /6005' (q_ WALNUT EET POINT "C ",PO.B. PARCEL 3 - of ALMERIA AVE.(N) iE_25cco L ° /8P.29' T-95e7'. SE 1/4 \N ( PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND PLANNERS 1820 E. 18th Street SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 PHONE 711.835.2548 N/5od..r7 Qo')W 1231440 / 3 -1° d. a'.94ro° • a7a9, PaNT'A; i' PO.B. PARCEL 2 SEC 36 / • RSB 6. M PARCEL 1 - �"� ALMERIA AVE. (N) to EXHIBIT 'Al SEE SHEET 5 SHEET 6 OF 6 CITY OF FONTANA. CALIFORNIA DEED PLAT Approved Pored No. A a{ PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: /PAN11.114. MADOLE R.C.E.14814 DATE e o • a= B°5e37� ,e • 750. L-/1752'7 PARCEL 1 SE 14 SEC. 36, • TIN , R6W, S.B.M. 5/.f CG16V4C 60C.34., T/.V. Ray/ / Na9!52 57 t ALMERIA AVE. (S) EXHIBIT 'A' PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF SEE SHEET 6 j CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND PLANNERS 11120 E. 16th Street SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 ( PHONE 714 • 1135.2648 MADOIE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. A23'4 240 �310 ,t• 7ao.cw' L. •//7741 e_o-C4-0 PO. B..PARCEL 1 N. BASELINE AVENUE SHEET 5 OF 6 CITY OF FONTANA, CALIFORNIA Pommel No. DEED PLAT we Sri x rnc% 1ms roP.d )yedti). Afrri • 134,1.2_ 4,:ev," .144,61,,,-42.. ?4,40 Tv/N. Moyec cosT . 7116/ 2 s EST? %'ATE - iris for &* ?V • av /- hb afeivr fZEi�-s4CEM+gNT �/ 1. vsTIwGl)1'itJ S[ a1/44 y Z ,�-s/ .� Sa /�, . s0n1s d7) Piv /CwPEr--PQN 6 4"j/6..aaX . (, uti,Ks X lac. 4- P/2o✓?Zr' Si,Ailflose, 6-5S m>nsPe cAl2b6t w Pr2ocesS — LE 6/'7/y 4S 2v owA/69t5 --- % 4, toatiP /Plirr Pao e2W GOY670$ /fMsurvr 74/ e'6 4i 2, 000 4000 2 /, 690 6‘)9 Sod ikv0/ 000 SSOCIATES.INC TEL 0.7148350612 ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION CITY OF FONTANA PROPOSAL BID SHEET, FOR CONSTRUCTION OF BASELINE AVENUE AND ALMERIA AVENUE TRUNK SEWER SYSTEM Sep 1111 8:34 No.003 P.02 X/yl 'ti ..4zi 0 L OL,"r 5 , F ESTINATED'= QUANTITY UNIT: T. PRICE°' TOTAL. AMOUNT' 1. 21"' V.C.P.-SEWER (E.L) 3,504 LF ' 90/00ALP'".,- `t Wa E. 18" V.C'.P.. SEWER (E.S'.} 2,398 IF' $.0100/ - lq biero 8" V.C'.R LIB 4, SEWER (ES.} 129 LF 5T 4. 60" MANHOLE . 1, i ;, 21 EA ; 6 5. REMOVE PLUGS JOIN 21" VCP . 1 EA SIB. f Gil''- •Z Q 6. SAWCUr REMOVE AND REPLACE- AC. PAVEMEN T 18"SEWER PLUG ." ' _ SEWER PLUG'' 9. STRIPING, RE=PLACENEKTF 10• TRENCH` SHORING. BRACINGK OR SHIELDING -.AND APPURTENANTe,WORK 4: ';;1 LS:. 11.: CLEARING.ANDARUBBING ' l.` LS ' 12. POTHOLE EXISTING UTILITIES 13. 21" x 6" LATERAL WYE ,' 8 EA 14. 18 ". z.6 LATERAL WYE> : 44.',EAr2 15.. 6" x 4��... REDUCER. 52 EA 16. EXCAVATION ' e�!J/►�l LSt Y' .4 4 ��SSOCIATES`I CP TEL 71.48350612. CITY OFFONTAMA' Sep 13 1 8:34 No.003 P.03 PROPOSAL BID SHEET FOR CONSTRUCTION OF BASELINE AVENUE AND ALMERIA AVENUE' TRUNK SEWER SYSTEM - ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION'' 17. - 'TRAFFIC CONTROL, INCLUDING ROAD_CLOSURE, WARNING ESTIMATED UNIT.. QUANTITY PRICE SIGNS,. DETOUR' ROUTING AND ALL APPURTENANT WORK. 2 LS TOTAL, AMOUNT ASSOCIATE .7148350612. art -S7/ / 1 1 E 741/ 1P6 4' /o cotin u*c/ /TZ"/'f,S ,t cr LoV -1 . € / /- _ Nbivu'iEN,T IZEt Ale Ei-tENT 2, ( Q - Gwv s rL a) DN svzvY /2 ©DO _. GPNS77LvGP*, /(NsP v") 2// 66i 27/ 4) P/2ocE5S Z E bAZ.5 1,00 k/J� 8/4 A \rc 0Q0 O /- 5x 4 /go doi s- tr/ il tS' x -O x /0, j L MADOLBASSOCIATES,INC TEI10.7148350612 Sep 11 8:34 No.003 P.01 rr� 1820 EAST SIXTEENTH STREET DATE; 9-- MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Civil Engineering, Land Planning and Surveying SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 (714) 835-2548 FAX II 714-835-0612 FAX COVER SHEET �O$ Feed Pe 6,//1/e.5 / Ofi f YYf4/J/X - FRODM: C441 Celear:/' ;"MADOL:E AND ASSOC IATEIS,:: `iNC SUBJECT: *Pe'? 9131/*?- pig/or TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES BEING SENT- •''' (INCLUDES THIS PAGE) d,o2f ow->E IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL OF THESE PAGES, PLEASE CALL BACK AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO OFFICE SENDING INFORMATION. THANK YOU /,G' " /2 l//-G "0-6 "OW pK /5 _L7 MADOLE&ASSOCIATES,INC TELS.7148350612 Sep AV 8.34 No.003 P.02 ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION CITY OP FONTANA PROPOSAL BID SHEET FOR CONSTRUCTION OF BASELINE AVENUE AND ALMERIA AVENUE TRUNK SEWER SYSTEM • ESTIMATED QUANTITY 1. 21" V.C.P. SEWER (E.S.) 2. 18" Y.C.P. SEWER (E.S.) 3. 8" V.C.P. SEWER (E.S.) 4. 60" MANHOLE , f , 3,504 LF 2,398 LF 129 LF 21 EA 5. REMOVE PLUG A JOIN 21" VCP 1 EA 6. .SAWCUT REMOVE AND REPLACE AC. PAVEMENT WW1/6 7. 18" SEWER PLUG _2 EA 8. 8" SEWER PLUG 14 EA 9. STRIPING RE -PLACEMENT _J&L_____IHENCH SHORING BRACING OR SHIELDING AND • 1 LS UNIT . PRICE TOTAL AMOUNT t /443 APPURTENANT ;:WORK j 1 LS: a' poo 7? 11. CLEARINGAND GRUBBING '; 1.LS 12. • POTHOLE EXISTING UTILITIES :.Z EA 8 EA; 13. 21" x 6" LATERAL WYE 14. 18" x 5" LATERAL WYE. 15.• 6" x 4" REDUCER 16. EXCAVATION P-12-A 45poo po /Op lezo Al Me) MADLE&ASSOCIATES,INC TEL • .7148350612 ' Sep 1 8:34 No.003 P.03 CITY OF FONTANA PROPOSAL BID SHEET FOR CONSTRUCTION OF BASELINE AVENUE AND ALMERIA AVENUE TRUNK SEWER SYSTEM •• ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION • ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT 17. TRAFFIC CONTROL, ]NCLUDING ROAD CLOSURE, WARNING SIGNS, DETOUR ROUTING AND ALL APPURTENANT WORK 1 LS .vcGk5 .r/ . # a 9fte44- ,-ry a- 766W 09/7oN 6?5'2,40 r + /5, tzvo / r , 60L.9 /2/ 00 / 7,25 r P-12-B 7/7/0 Me7,0- Off- /6* /490 ce,,c16 779 Ato0/.0.0r1 AN956-P A• re P/v 14 tiCIPPAP,t7e0 417- 60 G o MADOL'E&ASSOCIATES,INC TEL .7148350612 Sep 41091 8:34 No.003 P.04 4Wr r/ri' eve 9-//4/ iei e pwlzeir oe' pe,0rvernv 4WAYMP 4INIT &WSW awl:. M 40 al;elfwaer *16 r,�.rrir :/dv ,/P - . niygle-74/ Zr' 454 4 e exarmws- Sri irro, GoST W nErn 11 bit'w /fooD , EXr4,11 • cv.c,� _i�"�J�� 9 /3 9/ cr 4Os7 �Jw iti h 3 ES77 / %r /TANS ,or cos ie, P at//— 5 x /'loNuMENr /zePt- thG/or .44 de /D d. 71.4 roc — GVN S /Po L 5- o�y i / hrs owN /•��—W, . ,6 4#r/4,aaaR • 1 r . i` :. Ef" PiceSS p,a o 512f /o/ oco -� A/�f -f 'M OG''f' i i+i 'Ms emir �9�EMSNT 2, 000. svav&y, / 000, /tism/Er•Pbn/ /Yo11 Fi 11170/Y 7 LE 6ALS 7,7 4 8/6 aro L� 000 /2/ 9 2,, MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Civil Engineering, Land Planning and Surveying 1820 EAST SIXTEENTH STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 (714) 835-2548 FAX (714) 835-0612 APRIL 25, 1990 J.N. 142-1208 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE BASE LINE AVENUE 'RUNK SEWER — FONTANA dad,oc± 3> ITEM QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST 1. 60 " DIA. MANHOLE (17'DEEP) 12 EA. $3,200.00/EA $ 38,400.00 2. 21" VCP (EXTRA STRENGTH) (17 'DEEP) 3. 18" VCP (EXTRA STRENGTH) (17' DEEP) NAP 4. 15" VCP (EXTRA STRENGTH) (DAILY OA/E 'L = 61 1(17 'DEEP ) y/ce.E Awt 06i 5. 8" VCP (EXTRA STRENGTH) (17'DEEP) 6. 8" VCP STUB (4' MIN) WITH PLUG 3,219 L.F. 80.00/LF 257,520.00 67 L.F. 693 L.F. 50.00/LF 33 L.F. 26.00/LF 2 EA. 250.00/EA 500.00 7. 21" SEWER PLUG 1 EA. 8. REMOVE PLUG AND JOIN EXISTING 21" VCP 1 EA. �.� 9. SAWCUT A.C. PAVEMENT, REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT (13'X4,000) 52,000 S.F. 10. TRAFFIC CONTROL (SIGNS AND STRIPING) LUMP SUM 11. TRAFFIC CONTROL (FLAGMAN) (20 DAYS 8 $120/DAYX2FLAGMAN) LUMP SUM 60.00/LF 4,020.00 50.00/EA 250.00/EA 2.00/SF 4,000.00/LS 4,800.00/LS 858.00 50.00 250.00 9 X OE/'Sz 4,000.00 4,800.00 12. STRIPING REPLACEMENT LUMP SUM 4,000.00/LS 4,000.00 k' t 13. REMOVAL OF TRENCHING DIRT '(ASSUME 4,012 L.F.X (5.0'X3.50') — 27 = 2,600 C.Y.) 2,600 C.Y. 6.00/CY 15,600.00 14. CIVIL ENGINEERING (OFFICE i'nc(u S `1'25� % AND FIELD) LUMP SUM 40,000.00/LS 40,000.00 15. REPLACEMENT OF SURVEY MONUMENTS LUMP SUM 5,000.00/LS 5,000.00 SUB TOTAL 4-S-7 7$0 10% CONTINGENCY 445/7-7 GRAND TOTAL 50 3, 55 8 $513,648.00 51,365.00 $565,013.00 f=f o04D co e cT 8&Y t -0 fivsx-cin 6w n it 17%4-t&— r*w4W oa /91dYe .4 ibet.n nti oor LEEAvV 2. ,a'a-3) eveJ N o� • AiLMV(114 9-14fC(L. • 479 ff- ETC. SI IMPROVI OTHERS AGENCII 18. "AS-BU 19. ALL EX SEWER I THE PA' 20. INSPEC' 24 HOUI 21. ALL PRI TIES SI WORK. 22. ALL UT CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND OUANT I TY EST I MATE U"1U I'T 6oST P_ io I l4L c 3r � '`L4 1'145. ANY PA' 23. TERMIN, PLUG. STREET TERMIN. LINE. 24. ALL SE' OTHERW HEEL SEW THE LA 26. NO LATI 27. ENGINE' TRANSFI SEWER PRIOF LINES VERIF OF F NOT AND/C 29. G01.1TR TO FIN TO (EXTRA 7,2O LP W DINSTALL 8" SEWER MAIN STRE}JGTH) � ` `) INSTALL 4" HOUSE LATERAL (E.xrt2A ST1?ENGTH) "),770 LF NAP PER STD. DTL. 112 & 114 Z $ Ea IQ Pt-P 331, CONSTRUCT SEWER MANHOLE (4' D I A . ] INSTALL LATERAL WYE (8" x 4') �4) 202 EA �%A'P coWST C. 4 gF. L ,25. ��. P :2Ett.l .oi .G1� =GotJG 1=1.1GL\S/✓> IT F —.12 ."T S1�T 17 5� . �) JOIN TO EXISTING SEWER (QEMovE 113# 9eW612 PLUG) I EA P1/A- w/TEmpa,Ir 7) INSTALL SEWER TERMINAL CLEANOUT PER STD. DTL. 128 �O �A E'_N� PLUG _ . C 8/ > CONSTRUCT SEWER MANHOLE C5' D I A . ] PER DETAIL . ON SHEET 17 4 ® -1.-1- E A �/ 5 coo z 6, OOO -27g:O= I_F (O 94-5, %(x) 28. 9l INSTALL 18" SEWER MAIN (ExTizA 5TREIJGT14) 271-(ctS 10 INSTALL LATERAL WYE C 18" X 6" ] 62 Eh. OO 11 INSTALL 6" X 4" REDUCER 52 EA ZOOAND/C / 12 N-15TAL-1_ 18 51-ug 1 E,4. /Ns774f 1 • 6" SEli, EA_ a2W-/it, (L.m 4/ diva) p v6> ! 8 » 150 S� . , 9pv MU- 21 S7 JE IN LNia - LP .7o 19,950 _ w - if.)s-i LL.. 4II pLA)& 52 A- 40 2.1042,0 Causr/lucTION Su Vt Lwv-/7 /.� 000 �,eEiroA• .Nor /�cc ua� n'P S(�2Z;oCo 4 frt.., ' ,', 4 r ,:. .e_t, 5UO' rOrAL240,43o 10% cen(. 24,O4_3 C'HOU1LIM%%YET EEPHONC4rAFI'llIf-4 " - NOTE , •) G.; NO T S 3Oudt SEE S AND BI ( ALL SEWERS SHALL BE STRENGTH PIPE (ir) N o Te p-atocrtirT . 1, COO .r.1:) I,,D 2h4,413 • CITY OF FONTANA BENCH MARK n M64 (,JDE Pt/N; 5 G3kfSt ro,o0o F-on - 10-sPcmbu d A.Dn ZZ, pao 0 5,000 - - r Osd46� ra€iJT BENCH MARK • NO. 360 1 N I'S. 360 A NAIL IN POLE •1536704E AT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LIME AVE. AND BASELINE AVE. ELEVATION • 1376.03 PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES. INC. BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE BEARING OF N 89 61'00' E FOR THE NORTH LINE OF THE 8E 1/4 OF SECTION 36. TIN. R6W. B.B.M. AS SHOWN ON TRACT NO. 3348. M.B. 47/14-16 WAS USED AS THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS MAP. • I i�044, � TnN CIT DRAWN BY PLOTTER DESIGNED CITY OF FONTANA California MEMORANDUM TO: FELIPE NOLINOS PRINCIPAL ENGINEER/CAPITAL PROJECTS FROM: ROBERT W. MEDDLE, P.E. CITY ENGINEER RE: BASELINE CLOSURE FOR BASELINE/ALMERIA SEWER PROJECT DATE: DECEMBER 27, 1991 The attached December 23, 1991 memorandum from Clyde Sweet, City Traffic Engineer, indicates that a detailed field review of a short term closure on Baseline Avenue by the City of Rialto did not have the severe adverse impacts he anticipated. Therefore, he believes that we can now drop the option of the parallel detour road and spend our energies on developing a detailed detour plan. Please work with Clyde and his staff in developing the detour plan so that we can bid this project in January, if possible. Thanks. RWW:wp Enclosure cc: C. Sweet M. Pacheco P. Steele Project File CITY OF FONTANA California MEMORANDUM TO: ROBERT W. WEDDLE CITY ENGINEER FROM: CLYDE E. SWEET, JR., P.E. --�dioa/ , DEPUTY CITY ENGINEER/TRAFFIC ENGINE R RE: BASELINE DETOUR AND ROAD CLOSURE FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE: DECEMBER 23, 1991 Last week, I observed a two day closure of Baseline between Cactus and Maple. I reviewed, the traffic operating on Foothill and on Highland Avenue during the p.m. peak hour. The motorists appeared to adapt much more readily than I expected with mixed traffic flow. The one thing I did observe was that the traffic kept trying the side streets to return to Baseline. Based upon the above observations, I now believe that the road can be closed. I don't know the long term impacts of closure, but I have more confidence now that the mixed traffic flow is too heavy to be a serious problem. A detailed detour and side street closure plan is required. I would recommend detouring at Sierra and return at Cherry, with detour to Foothill, due to traffic signals instead of stop signs. CS:wp CITY OF FONTANA California MEMORANDUM TO: BOB WEDDLE, CITY ENGINEER FROM: CLYDE E. SWEET, JR., P.E., CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER DATE: AUGUST 30, 1991 RE: DETOUR OR CLOSURE FOR BASELINE TRAFFIC The reasons I am greatly concernedabout closing Baseline for the project are as follows: 1. Baseline carries. about 25,000 per day and most of it is longer trips- cross town, commute and through traffic. 2. Thelocal traffic that mixes into Baseline and doesn't recognize the' nature of the traffic can, and does, have accidents. -3. The nature of the Foothill Boulevard traffic is a preponderance of local, short trip, traffic.. It actually is more of a collector than an arterial, due to the strip commercial activity.. The relevance of - all this is that mixing the 25,000.from Baseline (fast communte, through traffic) with the 25,000 on Foothill (slower, shorter trips) could be a deadly accident potential. 4. 50,000 ADT or so on Foothill would be far different than 50,000 ADT on Sierra (by I-10) as the Sierra traffic is primarily repeat users in the peaks. . Baseline is becoming the truck route rather than Foothill, unless.. the destination is on Foothill. 6. I don't have a lot of number facts, but I have lots of observations that my conclusions about Foothill and Baselineare close to correct. 7.. The potential for rerouting Baseline traffic to Highland Avenue is about as poor. The traffic on Highland is pressurized due to slow trucks, tourists. and the dump traffic. Mixing more through and commute traffic with the slower existing traffic would be a high accident potential and make the Cherry, Citrus, Catawba and Sierra intersections even worse. <4'0,emo to Bob Weddle August 30, 1991 Page Two • . We have to attempt to evaluate the character of the traffic when we. consider mixing traffic streams. I have driven these routes over and over and I am unable to change my conclusions or my concerns. CES:sh cc: G. Bucknell J. Riley. H. Childress CITY OF FONTANA California MEMORANDUM TO: FELIPE MOLINOS PRINCIPAL ENGINEER/CAPITAL PROJECTS FROM: ROBERT W. WEDDLE, P.E. CITY ENGINEER RE: BASELINE CLOSURE FOR BASELINE/ALMERIA SEWER PROJECT DATE: DECEMBER 27, 1991 The attached December 23, 1991 memorandum from Clyde Sweet, City Traffic Engineer, indicates that a detailed field review of a short term closure on Baseline Avenue by the City of Rialto did not. have the severe adverse impacts. he anticipated. Therefore, he believes that we can now drop the option of the parallel detour road and spend our energies on, developing a detailed detour plan. Please work wi. I Clyde and his staff in developing the detour plan so that we can bid this project in January, if possible. Thanks. RWW:wp Enclosure • cc: C. Sweet M. Pacheco P. Steele Project File. CITY OF FONTANA California TO: ROBERT W. WEDDLE CITY ENGINEER FROM: CLYDE E. SWEET, JR., P.E. -''� DEPUTY CITY ENGINEER/TRAFFIC ENGINEER RE: BASELINE DETOUR AND ROAD CLOSURE FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE: DECEMBER 23, 1991 Last week, I observed a two day closure of Baseline between Cactus and Maple. I reviewed: the traffic operating on Foothill and on Highland Avenue during the p.m. peak hour. The motorists appeared to adapt much more readily than I expected with mixed traffic flow. The one thing I did observe was that the traffic kept trying the side streets to return to Baseline. Based upon the above observations, I now believe that the road can be closed. I don't know the long term impacts of closure, but I have more confidence now ,_that the mixed traffic flow is too heavy to be a serious problem. A detailed detour and side street closure plan is requi.red. I would recommend detouring at Sierra and return at Cherry, with detour to. Foothill, due to traffic signals instead of stop signs.. . CS:wp i HIGH LA mit - s� ,; z6.4t44/ 774.17.5 /14,Jb t 9t511314t- L-pc,n-t„ cionJnr---1 4 wr' goat* •OMMA/ r, /1.1:47;:f sire MY1 Ai. • •ArH{� h M1 1 �r'ti'r�s .ww 41441 wren r ❑❑❑ _�_z UMW L i - 1 7 CO 16 —V2 a / — trn4%1�ri�+P V l 719 i 1) q�v�p�d c,.b �� % =V not W1,0 i cr7wAw' "v1 bi\v al ` )0'D G .-. )1 I1 mr1 . Pam 64,0- Jaz - W Qui-^a11►J-9"�%2-a1110V ll•�1 is 1, ►t 1-4692-4) -A-mod • r fr 'ddd -20 IrTY\© 1) Post-it'routing request pad 7664 BRAND ROUTING - REQUEST Please WEAD ❑ HANDLE Li APPROVE and II FORWARD ❑ RETURN ❑ KEEP OR DISCARD ❑ REVIEW WITH ME Date 249�41I From CAL i To �.! it Pot Arrowhehd Vineyard Tract No.1. M.B. 16/69 10 Por. Etiwanda Vineyards. MB. 17/29 11 �y3 -BASE—LINE- --T —'-.2' z�9,-'3'o rams FON7ANA _, r 5 Z Q 4.29 'AC 4.30 AC r.+131•55'Se"w p64.Zi ('..o) MILLER .2.5 AC. 2.5 AC. vse. ' s+1.e� 4. A[,40 IALFLOT t , ARD TQRACTw , M 6 X7t!t 140 tR _ 55 47 46 54 9I 5 s$ 52 67 At 9 U 45 AC. 24 ® 4.5 AC. 250 4.5 AC. 9 ti #0. 40 4.5 AC a MP,1UR4 rower. 7// AVENUE Note -Assessor's BIk.8 Lot 2Q 53 ♦'. Fontono City Tax Rote Area 10111,10113 Assessor's Map Book 228 Page 19 Snn Rernordino County r��fil 228-' ;i+ I'•= 300. REVISED 2/25/86 6/11/86 11-17-69 R.8 6 2072 Gt.! 2/28/73 .7 c LIME Por. Etiwanda Vineyards M.B. 17/29 h tp N N h BASE -LINE 0 SULTANA 0 0 Fontana City -228-- Tax Rote Area L_ 10113 o v -J'L AVENUE a I re) J l__.„ AVENUE k 1 r I REV 2/25/86 6/3/86 Note -Assessor's 8lk.& Lot Numbers Shown in Circles Assessors Map Book 228 Poge 20 San Bernardino County -17-69 5 /15 /73 3/12/r° 12/3(8@ 214 3 u v 25 32 8 V s 99 34 P //8 4 ••3> 38 tiV 29 o, m n I n ... H/092/ l .••,�� .9 ,� 30 \\s. 37 U N n 2 A 32 ti 00 '9s 94 Ja !/ 36 n 31 V n U O 3 nm 31 as sc /U0 /02..-2-r_ 35 6 ,32 n 9 4 A H 4 2 30 to /00 /02 7504 Por. Tract No. 10907-I, M.B.I7I/23,24 / G0 G/ 76. 96./4 33 v ;28 34 co .27 3541 26 360 '25 37u 15 v n c y' o Nu. V wN 21 38.48 ON K 950.0/ AQ' �i ,�/,GQ .:1948) Y 0 0• o MESA-- - -DRIVE--�------- 0 n /. 87 zo jo L3 6 '1O 0 n N. 53 cN. 3o 4 0220. 34. 0 N '33 O 4 '1 0 N '* 5 N- 29 '' -1n \, 8S 87 �� 0 0 71 oda9EK-SON- ORo---- ^1 m as °�� i2 m 6 /00 ,I 7 87 '\ 3 t9y0 28 = 4 27 /00 /02 J() 30 0 9 0 8 n c • 54 /02 20 N 8 \‘N n 0' n c �5 5 N __-_ 1U2.20 C 7 8 56 __. ) 02.20 6 n 57c '02 20 5 58$ 97 20 N ' 11 ah, - v 0 52 /02.20 1.0 12 0 R N 2 51 0 N 91 ,oe zo /3 N 1\ 50 _ /0.3_0 14 N 49 0 n 115 N n -'48 2 16 N r\ 47 0 n _/U22_0_.- 30 /06 46 • (24 38 8 5 VI 3 23 p a W q' . v N 39`N 9/89 /' .O9 '22 h P jo sh 4O' 3024 74/0/.98 ° '21 3'7 3 J 4 0 41 /0/.87 4 0 20. (() 42 P. /O/. 85 9 8 43 p /0/ 94 •18 44 'O/83 17 - 45 4 /03 /4 a.9 1 45 20 (82) 209 44 39, Por. I 130 AC. 20945 IRA 70 --JACKSON 3) Fontana City Tax Rate Area 10113, 10130 0 ROAD-.• -- 209 45 /9942 ir. 40 Par. 2 130 AC. 409. 43 • 7,,T.4'c <61 I .47, ,n 4 5 ;I 6 ,.♦ /� 1..4.7v >1 1B 0e 19 '61) '7 18,, ,o . - 19 17 .,11m Ss) fir, . 8'' 16 j � 7b 48) WHITEW00 n 0 v N ar' Par. 3 30 AC. 10113 209 43 1,..1 70101�300 (qgl 7 DRIVE 52110 n 14;56'' 13(.55) ,53) I I `4) 12 r i /•. m/' i 43 nln 1?77(1 AA R 17/I/00/ 00 Assessor's Map In"... 4 4 REVISED 7/9/84 P 10/25/84. R CITY OF FONTANA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMEIiT 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, CA 92335 TO: MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 1820 East Sixteenth Street Santa Ana, CA 92701 ATTN: Mr. James Madole Gentlemen: We are sending you: the following item: IX! Attached I I Drawings I I Prints I I Plar I I Copy of Letter I I Change Orc I I Other: LETTER O • MITTAL File: Tract 12314 Date: October 22, 1991 RE: Street & Utilities Easement For Almeria Avenue ROUTI Please ❑ READ ❑ HANDLE ❑ APPROVE and e L FORWARD ❑ RETURN ❑ KEEP OR DISCARD ❑ REVIEW WITH ME DATE NO. Dab I © 2 COPIES 1 From QUEST Purpose: For your information/records For approval I I Approved as submitted For your use I I Approved as noted As requested I I Returned for corrections For review & comment I I Other For bid due: , 19 Please: I I Submit original IX! Resubmit 2 copies for $00f¢y$7 check. I Submit copies for distribution I 1 Return corrected prints I I Other Prints returned after loaned to: Remarks: A 15 ft. wide strip, (a portion of the parcel 1 to be dedicated) within the property just west of Tract 12314. If this portion is also to be dedicated, please modify the "That Portion" paragraph so as to inidicate said strip. If you may have any Questions or need additional information, please call Ricardo Sandoval at (714) 350-6655. Copy to: Richard Cota, P.E. Signed: • tug - Title: ssistant En'ineer RECORDING REQUESTED BY CITY OF FONTANA WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY OF FONTANA P.O. BOX 518 FONTANA, CA 92334 ATTN: ENGINEERING DIVISION APN - NO E AND WALNUT STREET) ADDRESS- - N/A BUILDNG PERMIT - ALMERIA AVENUE TR SEWER DOCUMENTARY TAX DUE: NONE BY: EASEMENT DEED THE PRESLEY COMPANIES, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, FORMERLY KNOWN AS PRESLEY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION (Grantors) FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant to the CITY OF FONTANA, a Municipal Corporation, an easement for street, highway and public utility purposes over, under, and upon the real property in the City of Fontana, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as follows: PARCEL 1: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36 TTOWNHE SHIPTY O1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDI , IN F FONTANA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT OF SAID LAND; BEING A PORTION OF TRACT NO. 12314 "AS SHOWN ON MAP BOOK 240, PAGES 3 TO 10 INCLUSIVE, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, INCLUDED WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 64.00 FEET WIDE, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF BASELINE AVENUE AND ALMERIA AVENUE (EXTENDING.,„NORTH), SAID INTERSECTION BEING DISTANT NORTH 89 52'57 EAST 628.64-FEET FROM THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 36; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF ALMERIA AVENUE AS FOLLOWS: SHEET 1 OF 6 -2— NORTH 0 04'58" WEST 660.29 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY AND - HAVING A RADIUS OF 750.00 FEET; �. NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURyt THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8 58'39'- AN ARC DISTANCE OF 117.52�FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 750.00FEET, A RADIAL LINE OF SAID REVERSE CURVE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 81 06'19" EAST; NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8 59'40" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 117.74 FEET; TANGENT TO SAID CURVE, NORTH 0 05'59-'WEST 691.87"°a' FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIOS OF 250.00 FEET; NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 41 45'49"BAN ARC DISTANCE OF 182.23 —FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF ALMERIA AVENUE (EXTENDING NORTHWESTERLY) AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP OF TRACT NO. 12314, SAID INTERSECTION HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT "A"; THENCE CONTINUING NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID LAST MENTIONED CURVE _THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8 34,'10' AN ARC DISTANCE OF 37.39 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT "B", A RADIALLINE OF SAID CURVE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 39 46'00" WEST. %THE SIDE LINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND &HALL BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE SOUTHERLY.- THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 30.00 FEET, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER CF SAID SECTION 36 AND NORTHERLY IN A LINE WHICH BEARS NORTH.39 46'00" WEST AND WHICH PASSES THROUGH POINT ` "B " HEREINBEFORE DESCRIBED. ��, PARCEL 2 G� pLc—r THAT PORTION OF TRACT NO. 12314, IN THE CITY OF FONTANA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS SHOWN ON MAP BOOK 2407-- PAGES 3—Tr10 INcL1 SIVE, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, INCLINED WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND SEET WIDE, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT POINT "A"JBEREINBEFORE DESCRIBED IN PARCEL 1; THENCE ALONG SAID CSNTERL E OF ALMERIA AVENUE AS FOLLOWS: NORTH 48 20'10" WEST 134. FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGEN VE CONCAVE NORTHEASTE AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 250.06 FEET; NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 48- 15' 12 ; ,/AN ARC DISTANCE OF 210.54T; TANGENT TO SAID CURVE, NORTH 0 04'58" WEST 469.37✓`EET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF WALNUT STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP OF TRACT NO. 12314, SAID INTERSECTION HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT "C". SHEET 2 OF 6 -3 /l. THE SIDE LINES OF SAID STRIP OF SHALL BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE SOUTHERLY N THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE PARCEL 1 HEREINBEFORE DESCRIBE AND NORTHERLY IN A LINE ARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT SOUTHERLY 30.00 FEET, MEASURE AT TIGHT ANGLES, FROM A LINE WHICH BEARS NORTH 89 51'00" EAST AND /WHICH PASSES THROUGH POINT "C" HEREINBEFORE DESCRIBE PARCEL 3: THAT PORTION OF TRACT NO. 12314, IN THE CITY OF FONTANA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS SHOWN ON MAP BOOK 240, PAGES 3 TO 10 INCLUSIVE, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, INCLUDED WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 60.00 FEET WIDE, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT POINT "C" HEREINBEFORE DESCRIBED IN PARCEL 2; THENCE ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF W,WFUT STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP, SOUTH 89 51'00" WEST 45.05 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT "D", SAID POINT "D" BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF WALNUT STREET, NORTH 89 51'00" EAST 180.05 /FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 12314. THE SIDE LINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND ARE TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE WESTERLY IN A LINE WHICH BEARS NORTH 0 09'00" WEST WHICH PASSES THROUGH POINT "D" HEREINBEFORE DESCRIBED AND EASTERLY IN SAID EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 12314. Said described parcels are as shown on "Exhibit A", Sheets 5 & 6 Dated this day of , 19 THE PRESLEY COMPANIES, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, FORMERLY KNOWN AS PRESLEY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION BY:. BY: SHEET 3 OF 6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF -4- S.S. On before me PERSONALLY APPEARED personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/ her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (SEAL) This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the deed or grant dated from THE PRESLEY COMPANIES, A CALIFORNIA CORPORA- TION, FORMERLY KNOWN AS PRESLEY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, A CALIFORNIA CORPOR- ATION to the City of Fontana, California, a Municipal Corpora- tion, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer pursuant to authority conferred by resolution of the City Council adopted on July 16, 1991;and the grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. CITY OF FONTANA BY: Robert W. Weddle, P.E. City Engineer SHEET 4 OF 6 City Parcel No. PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF 7 A/o. .S/ MAOOLE ANO ASSOCIATES, INC. PARCEL 3 TRUE PO.B. PARCEL, 3ry POINT D Sd' *.sia9 �/l 45. , r No °09'co PARCEL 2 d - 40°/5 %2' R r t"50. Go' • r; ?/ 97 . /9d'2o/o(/ 1• 231240 / 3.10 i /3¢. /7' = 25o. co' �•a7a9, POINT' B POINT'A; PO.B. PARCEL 2 SEC. 36 R 6W S.B.M /15005' o}. 1/49 Q WALNUT StREET POINT'C',PO.B. I PARCEL 3 ALMERIA AVE.(N) CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND PLANNERS 1820 E. 1601 Street SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 PHONE 711 •OW 2948 N0. • V5%;t97 26acol L '/At29'/ T•9537'. se 114 T N' PARCEL 1 T r h �lT EXHIBIT 'Ae SEE SHEET 5 ( ALMERIA AV• E. (N) SHEET 6 OF 6 CITY OF FONTANA. CALIFORNIA A ppee•ed le Parcel No. DEED PLAT bps • PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: V . MADOLE R.C.E.14814 DATE Q: B°51339;2. ,e • 760. co' 4°//752'� 7; 56.45' , PARCEL 1 SE 1/4 SEC. 36. - TIN R6W. S.B.M. its1 5* CORN/SM. 60c.3l., ,Q6V/ l N47's2'67 c_ ALMERIA AVE. (S) EXHIBIT 'A' SEE SHEET 6 I• PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 240 4 = a °s940° R• 750.Ap' Z. •//7. 74 j 7'• 53.771 PO.B., PARCEL 1 AND LAND PLANNERS 1820 E. 18th Street SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 PHONE 714 • 835.2548 '1 i-LLi 6,q BASELINE AVENUE CITY OF FONTANA. CALIFORNIA DEED PLAT Approved t, Pared No. D•e.. By' • • City of Fontana CALIFORNIA MEMORANDUM FROM: DATE: 0A/ eeY 741 TO: taj SUBJECT: e9---Zej ac44771-4.1. - A- L/0-?,„1,,rj \fi/14, )61- 4 /i•IA-f3 RECORDING REQUESTED BY CITY.OF FONTANA WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO CITY OF FONTANA P.O. BOX 518 FONTANA, CA 92334 ATTN: ENGINEERING DIVISION APN - NONE (ALMERIA AVENUE AND. WALNUT STREET) ADDRESS N/A BUILDING PERMIT - ALMERIA AVENUE TRUNK SEWER DOCUMENTARY TAX DUE: NONE BY:. - EASEMENT DEED - THE PRESLEY- COMPANIES, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, FORMERLY KNOWN AS PRESLEY OF SOUTHERN-CALIFORNIA, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION (Grantors) FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, -does hereby grant to. the CITY OF FONTANA,.a Municipal Corporation, an easement for street,; highway and public utility purposes over, under, and upon the real property in the City of Fontana, County of San Bernardino, State of California,. described as follows: PARCEL 1: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY -OF FONTANA, COUNTY. OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,'- ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT OF SAID LAND; BEING A PORTION OF TRACT NO.. 12314 AS SHOWN ON MAP BOOK 240, PAGES 3 TO 10. INCLUSIVE, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY. RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY,` INCLUDED WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 64.00 FEET WIDE, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF BASELINE AVENUE.. AND ALMERIA AVENUE .(EXTENDING NORTH), SAID INTERSECTION' BEING DISTANT NORTH 89 52'57" EAST 628.64 FEET FROM THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 36; THENCE ALONG SAID. CENTERLINE OF ALMERIA AVENUE AS FOLLOWS -2— NORTH 0 04'58 WEST 660.29 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 750.00 FEET; NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 858'39" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 117.52 FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 750.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE OF SAID REVERSE CURVE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 81 06'19" EAST; NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8 59 ' 40 " AN ARC DISTANCE OF 117.74 FEET; TANGENT TO SAID CURVE, NORTH 0 05'59" WEST 691.87 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING "A RADIUS OF . 250.00 FEET; NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID. CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 41 45' 49 " AN ARC DISTANCE OF 182.23 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF 'ALME'RIA, AVENUE (EXTENDING NORTHWESTERLY) AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP OF TRACT NO. 12314, SAID INTERSECTION HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT "A"; THENCE . CONTINUING . NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID LAST' MENTIONED CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF.8 34'10" AN ARC DISTANCE OF_ 37.39 FEET. TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT "B", A RADIAL .LINE. OF SAID CURVE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 39.46'00." WEST ., THE SIDE LINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND SHALL BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS' TO TERMINATE SOUTHERLY IN THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE •SOUTHERLY 30.00 .FEET, MEASURED, AT RIGHT ANGLES, OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER' OF SAID SECTION 36 AND NORTHERLY IN ALINE WHICH BEARS NORTH 39 46'00" WEST AND WHICH PASSES THROUGH POINT "B" HEREINBEFORE DESCRIBED. PARCEL 2 THAT PORTION OF TRACT NO. 12314, IN THE CITY OF FONTANA,°COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS SHOWN ON MAP BOOK 240,, PAGES 3 TO''10'INCLUSIVE , IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, INCLUDED WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 50.00' FEET WIDE, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:` BEGINNING.. AT "POINT "A" HEREINBEFORE DESCRIBED. IN. PARCEL 1; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF ALMERIA AVENUE AS. FOLLOWS NORTH 48 20'10 WEST 134.17 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF.A TANGENT; CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 250..00a FEET; NORTHWESTERLY . ALONG SAID CURVE " THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF .4 8 15' 12 " AN a ARC DISTANCE OF 210.54 FEET; TANGENT TO SAID CURVE, NORTH" 0 04'58". WEST 469.37 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF WALNUT STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP OF'TRACT, NO. 12314, SAID INTERSECTION HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS.POINT '"C". SHEET 2 OF 6 .. -3- THE SIDE LINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND SHALL BE PROLONGED OR• SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE SOUTHERLY IN THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 1 HEREINBEFORE DESCRIBED AND NORTHERLY IN A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT SOUTHERLY 30.00 FEET, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM A LINE WHICH BEARS NORTH 89 51'00" EAST AND WHICH PASSES THROUGH POINT "C" HEREINBEFORE DESCRIBED. PARCEL 3: THAT PORTION OF TRACT NO. 12314, IN THE CITY OF FONTANA,"COUNTY OF. SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS SHOWN ON MAP BOOK 240 PAGES 3 TO 10 INCLUSIVE, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, INCLUDED WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 60.00 FEET WIDE, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT POINT "C" HEREINBEFORE DESCRIBED IN PARCEL 2; THENCE ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF WALNUT STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP, SOUTH 89 51'00" WEST 45.05 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT "D", SAID POINT "D" BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF WALNUT STREET, NORTH 89 51'00 EAST 180.05 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 12314. THE SIDE LINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND ARE TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE WESTERLY IN A LINE WHICH BEARS NORTH 0 09'00" WEST AND WHICH PASSES THROUGH POINT "D" HEREINBEFORE DESCRIBED AND EASTERLY IN SAID EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 12314. Said described parcels are as shown on "Exhibit A", Sheets 5 & 6 Dated this day of , 19 THE PRESLEY' COMPANIES, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, FORMERLY KNOWN AS PRESLEY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION BY: BY: SHEET 3 OF 6 STATE OF .CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF On -4- S.S. before me 'PERSONALLY APPEARED I personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed, the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/ her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalfof which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature This is to certify that the interest in real property. conveyed by the deed or grant dated from THE PRESLEY COMPANIES, A CALIFORNIA CORPORA- TION, FORMERLY KNOWN AS PRESLEY OF - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA,' A CALIFORNIA CORPOR- ATION to the City of Fontana, California, a Municipal Corpora- tion, is hereby accepted by the undersignedofficer. pursuant to authority conferred by resolution. of the City Council adopted;, on July 16,'1991;and. the grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly' authorized officer. CITY OF FONTANA BY: Robert W. Weddle,.P.E. City Engineer SHEET 4-OF 6. City Parcel No. PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: .M. MADOLE R.C.E.14814 DATE Np . • 9 Pc, Q- B°5 7" ,e 76o.co' ,L ' //752' 58. e SE 1/4 SEC. 36, TIN ' R 6W, S.B.M. 5M CO,ew a 6$C.3ro, Thy..Rd, W 1V ? s2 57, SEE SHEET 6 d� lof P AO/310 I(= Q O6-177^M it. 760000 L- '//774' ALMERIA AVE. PO.B., PARCEL 1 Cv2b. Off ALMERIA AVE. (S) EXHIBIT 'A' CITY. OF.FONTANA'. CALIFORNIA PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND PLANNERS 1820 E. 16th Street SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 PHONE 714.835.2548 BASELINE AVENUE Approved SHEET 5 OF 6 • EL.LGVE is/ PARCEL TRUE PO.B. PARCEL, 3; POINT D`- 0 3 ,ve9 cb';E /&2 05' 587 '00'W . .45:05 ,/ oacl PARCEL 2 A - Sid °/5 22' R = PSO. ct�' Me PREPARED. IN THE OFFICE OF MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. - CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS: AND LAND PLANNERS 1820 E. 16th Street ° SANTA ANA,CALIFORNIA 92701 PHONE 714 • 835 2548 WALNUT STREET. - POINT "C • PARCEL 3 No. m h T - /.19'5'49". R=25.0c ' 1/4 PARCEL 1 - EXHIBIT:. '.11 O: c. ALMERIA AVE.(N) Nl,6 °20%o j</ 1231 An • /e = 256.. co' POINT"B• *41. N.o POINTW; PO.B. PARCEL 2 36 SEC:- 6"S.B. 7 SEE SHEET 5 ITY OF FONTANA. CALIFORNIA ALMERIA AVE..(N) SHEET OF City of Fontana CALIFORNIA December 4, 1991 Ken McVey, Esquire Best, Best & Krieger P. 0. Box 1028 Riverside, CA 92502 RE: Baseline/Almeria Sewer Project Dear Mr. McVey: As we discussed last week, time is of the essence in getting the Baseline/Almeria sewer project out to construction. I have enclosed two documents for your review and modification pursuant to the need to not commit to any right of way acquisition until after a resolution of necessity is recorded. I. Initial Study Only on page 6 and in attachments 1 and 3 is there any reference to any need to construct a temporary detour road with its accompanying need for temporary construction easements. II. Draft Council Report - October 15, 1991 This report was pulled from the process once you advised us of the new Chadwick case that is a setback on agency acquisition right of way via eminent domain. While this report can be modified to delete that portion in Council's authorization to advertise for bids until we have a resolution of necessity or actual possession of the property, there is a need to process the environmental document and get Council funding approvals. This project has been expanded in length since the City's budget was adopted, and the costly $100,000 parallel detour roadway in a temporary construction easement needs Council approval as to their risk management role. While the parallel detour roadway has been designed, we do not want to spend any more money in acquiring right of way without Council's concurrence. 8353 SIERRA AVENUE (P.O. BOX 518) • FONTANA, CALIFORNIA 92334-0518 • (714) 350-7600 SISTER CITY- KAMLOOPS, B.C. CANADA Mr. Ken McVey December 4, 1991 Page Two Please discuss this with Mr. Alsop and/or Mr. Deitsch of your office and advise the undersigned on how to proceed. Feel free to call at 714-350-7613. Very truly yours, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Engineering Division Robert W. Weddle, P.E. City Engineer RWW:sh Enclosure: Initial Study Draft 10/15/91 Council Report cc: G. Hulsizer F. Molinos M. Pacheco K. Anderson D. Bogen, Best, Best & Krieger • AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCIL ACTION REPORT OCTOBER 15. 1991 CONSENT CALENDAR Meeting Date Agenda Placement TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Russell A. Carlsen, City Manager INITIATED BY: Greg Hulsizer, Community Development Director Robert W. Weddle, P.E., City Engineer PREPARED BY: Felipe Molinos, Principal Engineer/Capital Improvements SUBJECT: Authorization to Advertise for Bids for the Construction of Sewer Trunk Line on Baseline Avenue from Beech to Almeria and North on Almeria Avenue to Walnut Street CURRENT ACTION REQUESTED: 1. TO AUTHORIZE THE ENGINEERING DIVISION TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SEWER TRUNK LINE ON BASELINE AVENUE FROM BEECH TO ALMERIA AND NORTH ON ALMERIA AVENUE TO WALNUT STREET. (ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $846,000) 2. TO AUTHORIZE THE APPROPRIATION TO ACCOUNT NO. 071-7243-4300 OF $600,000 FROM THE UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE OF SEWER FUND 071. _ Funding _ General BUDGET IMPACT: I_� No IXXI Yes Source: I_I Fund Budget IXXI Sewer (071) Fund Budget L_I Bond Proceeds 1I Developer Deposits The funds for this project were partially budgeted in the FY 91/92 Budget under Account Number 071-7243-4300 in the amount of $365,000. That budgeted amount was for the construction of a sewer line on Baseline between Beech Avenue and Almeria Avenue. The current project also includes a sewer main on Almeria Avenue from Baseline north to Walnut Street to connect to the City's pending Highland/Haven project. In order to fund the construction, a request for budget transfer to cover the additional appropriation will be submitted to the Management Services Department to transfer the funds from unappropriated Fund 071 reserves to Account No. 071-7243-4300, for a total project cost of $965,000. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: iX i Yes I I No An environmental checklist report has been prepared, and final determination has been made to prepare a Mitigated Negative Declaration. This will be submitted within a short time to the County Clerk's office and to all property owners as required by law. After the required notification period, it will be presented to Council for final adoption at or prior to award of the construction contract. BACKGR0UND: The construction of these Master Planned sewer line projects has been planned for a number of years. It was originally planned that the 18" Almeria sewer line was to be constrtd by the Presley Company subision with the City paying for the upsizing costs (i.e. from 8" to 18" in diameter). However, due to the slow economy, the Presley Company has put their project on hold, and they are reportedly considering selling the project to another developer. As the timing to_serve the Highland/Haven area cannot wait some unknown number of years, the City will take the lead and get the eligible reimbursements from the future developer when the subdivision actually starts construction. Additionally, there is another unanticipated project cost (approximately $100,000). Due to heavy traffic on Baseline, for public safety reasons, it is necessary that a temporary parallel road be constructed to bypass the construction area on Baseline (see exhibit to Environmental Checklist). Other traffic detour alternatives were considered, but the City Traffic Engineer feels that there is larger potential of traffic accidents and public hazard if traffic is detoured through Citrus or Cherry and carried over to Foothill or Highland. In order to construct this parallel road, it will be necessary to remove approximately 18 existing eucalyptus trees and to obtain temporary right-of-way for roadway purposes from approximately 15 adjacent property owners. The trees which are removed for this project are the minimum necessary to route the temporary road north between existing telephone poles. The many remaining eucalyptus trees will eventually be removed when Baseline Avenue is widened at some indeterminant future date. Engineering Division staff and right-of-way consultants will be working on acquiring this temporary right-of-way easement and will be contacting the property owners. The road will be removed as part of this project after the sewer line is in place and Baseline is restored to its original condition, as well as the temporary roadway area. This project is part of the Sewer Master Plan adopted in 1982 and as revised in 1986. The construction of the sewer trunk line is required to provide sewer service to the Highland Haven project, Rancho Fontana Specific Plan area, and a portion of North Fontana. The construction of this sewer line will be in conjunction with the Redevelopment infrastructure project for the Highland Haven area. JUSTIFICATION: The construction of this sewer trunk line is required to extend sewer service in this area. The successful completion of this project will also help the potential development projects in the area. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Copy of Request for Budget Transfer 2. Copy of Environmental Checklist Report „:4, r 3. Copy of memo from the City Traffic Engineer to the City Engineer (44''` REVIEWED BY: Jennifer Vaughn Blakely Assistant City Manager GH:RW:FM:wp REVIEWED BY: RECOMMENDED BY: Clark Alsop or Steve Deitsch City Attorney Russell A. Carlsen City Manager n� vu�J I run ouuuM I i rtArvJrtrt (I -'LEASE r(PE) FUND NAME: f l 5eeg BUDGET VOU•ER # DEPT/DIVISION: &Nin)Peit tNQ (Use an attached sheet for more than seven account numbers) (FINANCE USE ONLY) . 11-DIGIT ACCOUNT* ACCOUNT NAME;: • CURRENT BUDGETT': ADJUSTMENT. (EVEN $: =COO) 1 (OXX- XXXX- XXXX' (Original; plus > Adp DECREASE: 7l- INCREASE: 7/• 7Py3- y3ea 6j/ci.-.-. REASON FOR TRANSFER: $( Co�� $( ( $( $( $( $ (oea, era $ $ $ $ $ $ VERIFIED BY: APPROVED BY: _ -YAM/DE'AR "T EAD APPROVED BY: BUDGET OFFICE PHONE: 7 L 7 DATE: 9-/4 DATE: DATE: NOTE: ALL APPROVED COUNCIL MINUTES APPROPRIATING/TRANSFERRING FUNDS MUST BE ATTACHED BUDGET OFFICE 09-Aug-91 • • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM (To Be Completed By Lead Agency) I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent CITY OF FONTANA 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent 8353 Sierra Avenue 3. Date of Checklist Submitted Fontana. CA 92335 4. Agency Requiring Checklist CITY OF FONTANA 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable CONSTRUCTION OF SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ON BASELINE AVENUE FROM BEECH TO ALMERIA AVENUE AND ON ALMERIA AVENUE FROM BEECH AVENUE TO WALNUT STREET. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) Yes Maybe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? _ X X PROPER TRENCHING AND SHORING TECHNIQUES AS DEFINED IN THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION, ALSO KNOWN AS THE "GREEN BOOK" SHALL ALLEVIATE UNSTABLE EARTH CONDITIONS DURING SEWER CONSTRUCTION. b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? THE CONSTRUCTION SITE WILL BE RETURNED TO "AS IS CONDITION" USING PROPER SOIL COMPACTION AND TESTING. c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? THE SEWER LINE CONSTRUCTION ON ALMERIA WILL NEED GRADING OF A MAINTENANCE DIRT ROAD WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WHEN FUTURE ADJACENT AREA DEVELOPS, ROAD WILL BE IMPROVED TO ITS ULTIMATE CONDITION. CITY-COB.FJ Page 1 of 9 FORM "J" -2- ATTACHMENT 2 Yes Maybe No d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? _ X DURING CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ABATE DUST NUISANCE BY SPRINKLING WITH WATER. e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X X g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? X X TRENCH BACKFILL SHALL BE DENSIFIED TO 90%e MINIMUM RELATIVE COMPOSITION, SO GROUND FAILURE SHOULD NOT OCCUR FOLLOWING THE PROJECT. 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? TO MINIMIZE FOUL AIR EMMISSIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR IS REGULATED BY ARTICLE 7-8.2 OF THE "GREEN BOOK". b. The creation of objectionable odors? X c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? d. Emission of hazardous air pollutants within one-fourth of a mile of a school? e. Burning of municipal wastes, hazardous waste or refuse -derived fuel and consists of either the construction of a new facility or the expansion of an existing facility by more than 10 percent? CITY-COB.FJ Page 2 of 9 FORM "J" 411 Yes Maybe J 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of di- rection of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage pat- terns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course of flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, in- cluding but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X X X X X h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X i. Exposure of people or property to water re- lated hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? _ X . Significant changes in the temperature, flow or chemical content of surface thermal springs? _ X 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or num- ber of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? _ X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? _ X c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- ment of existing species? _ X CITY-COB.FJ Page 3 of 9 FORM "J" -4- • Yes Maybe No d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? _ X 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or num- bers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell- fish, benthic organisms or insects)? _ X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species? _ X c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migra- tion or movement of animals? X d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X SEE RANCHO FONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT SECTION ATTACHED 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? X X DURING CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVELS WILL BE ENFORCED BY STATE LAWS. THE HOURS OF CONSTRUCTION WILL BE LIMITED TO 7:00 AM TO 6:00 PM. b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? _ X 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a.sub- stantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Substantial depletion of any non- renewable natural resource? CITY-COB.FJ Page 4 of 9 FORM "J" Yes Maybe No 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE TO ARTICLE 7-10 OF THE "GREEN BOOK" WHICH ADDRESSES PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND SAFETY. 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? SEE RANCHO FONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - SECTION ATTACHED X 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing hous- ing, or create a demand for additional housing? X SEE RANCHO FONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - SECTION 5.2.8 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact upon existing transpor- tation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and/or goods? THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL CAUSE NO UNNECESSARY INCONVENIENCE. THE ACCESS RIGHTS OF THE PUBLIC SHALL BE CONSIDERED AT ALL TIMES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE TO ARTICLE 7-10 OF THE "GREEN BOOK". X X e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? _ X CITY-COB.FJ Page 5 of 9 FORM "J" -6- Yes Maybe No f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE FOR NECESSARY TRAFFIC CONTROL INCLUDING ALL SIGNS, BARRICADES, FLASHERS AND FLAGMAN NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN PROPER CONTROL. A TEMPORARY 2-WAY ASPHALTED DETOUR ROAD PARALLEL AND NORTH OF BASELINE IS A PROPOSED ALTERNATE ACCESS BEING INVESTIGATED. ACQUISITION OF TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS COULD BE DONE SUBJECT TO AGENCY APPROVING A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY. 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered gov- ernmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? _ X b. Police protection? _ X c. Schools? X d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X PERIODIC SEWER AND ROAD MAINTENANCE WILL BE PERFORMED AS REQUIRED. f. Other governmental services? _ X 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _ X b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? _ X 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: _ X a. Power or natural gas? _ X b. Communication systems? _ X c. Water? X d. Sewer or septic tanks? X CITY-COB.FJ Page 6 of 9 FORM "J" 411 • Yes Maybe No e. Storm water drainage? X f. Solid waste and disposal? _ X 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? _ X b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? X 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration or destruction of a prehistoric or historical archeological site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? 21. Mandatory Finding of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? _ CITY-COB.FJ Page 7 of 9 FORM "J" -8- • Yes Maybe No b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a rela- tively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) X c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively con- siderable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) _ X d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? _ X 22. EIR Tiering Determination. (SEE ATTACHMENT 2) (See * 12 Tiering Guidelines.) a. Is this project consistent with a program, plan, policy or ordinance for which an EIR has been prepared and certified? b. Is this project consistent with applicable local land use plans and zoning of the city and county in which it is located? c. May this project cause significant effects on the environment that were not examined in the prior EIR? III. DISCUSSION On attached sheets, discuss: X X 1. The environmental evaluation. 2. Ways, if any, to mitigate any significant effects identified. 3. Compatibility with existing zoning and plans. IV. DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: X I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. CITY-COB.FJ Page 8 of 9 FORMS "J" -9- • X I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on these previous sheets and on an attached sheet have been added to the project by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required., I find that the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment, but that this project is consistent with a previously prepared TIERED EIR on the overall program, plan, policy or ordinance, and that such TIERED EIR adequately examines the possible environmental effects of this project. Date: `�— /8 - 9/ PREPARED BY: /6t-'tx; LIAA-1 Felipe Molinos, P.E. !///7///p( Principal Engineer REVIEWED BY: Robert W. Weddle, P.E.9��b City Engineer APPRO ria L.. f .A K rt !d!' Deputy P nning Manager `/ gat t CITY-COB.FJ Page 9 of 9 FORMS "J" 24 ID anioraw>L11111.1.111. oppinnommy. i Ti S6G11047 tin 461014.1IlvsMsJOT CVIPti" drqfift• 45% COMPACNID in)wrni0' 6ok9bi vpautwitys TEts41191tAg4 VEIV tR 9A,SE idoJe O I® 0 t • 1 ATTAC r1E11T 1 7.3.15.2 Sewer Facilities A detailed engineering report was prepared by Albert A. Webb Associates which analyzed the infrastructure (i.e., sewer, water, storm drain) needs for Rancho Fontana. That report has been appended with this Specific Plan. The following text provides a summary of the findings, conclu- sions, and recommendations of that engineering report. Existing Conditions The City of Fontana currently owns and operates the waste-_ water collection system within Fontana. The City has con- tracted with the Chino Basin Municipal Water District (CBMWD) to treat and dispose of the effluent. Presently, there are no sewer lines connected to the property. Sewage is treated in CBMWD Regional Plant No. 3 in Fontna which is located at the southwest corner of Beech and Jurupa Avenues, approximately four miles south of Rancho Fontana. Present flow to this facility is 3.2 million gallons per day (mgd); the rated capacity of the plant is 3.5 mgd. The CBMWD has obtained Clean Water Grant funds to expand the treatment plant capacity at Regional Plant No. 1 to treat flow from Regional Plant No. 3. The plan was to construct the Fontana Interceptor which would carry the wastewater from Regional Plant No. 3 to Regional Plant No. 1 and phase out Regional Plant No. 3. However, this aspect of the plan has been delayed pending funding of the Fontana Interceptor and the result of Chino Basin Water Reclamation Study.2 The grant eligible flows for the Fontana Interceptor are 6.2 and 10.2 mgd for average daily flow and peak design flow, respectively. The Draft Proj- ect Report on the Water Reclamation Study has recommended the retention of Regional Plant No. 3 for groundwater reclamation. Potential Impacts Development of Rancho Fontana as proposed will result in the daily generation of approximately 750,000 gallons of 'Robert Schoenborn, P.E., Public Works Director, City of Fontana; letter dated December 1, 1981. 2Rancho Fontana Engineering Report, March 1982; p. 1-4. 3Ibid. `OCRCS VII-92 RA►JCHO FO rrANPr SPEGiP(C PC.AN NO, 1 ANC E.MV O,JH=JmL IMPACT T2E por.r NO. S(—% CPTER. N/II MASTL.2 EtwilZo►JMENTL /MPAcr RE.Po21- AD-t € M6E(Z /982 -12- The total estimated project cost of $1,659,000 would provide capacity in the Beech Avenue trunk line in accordance with the City of Fontana General Plan land uses. The proposed 21-inch diameter Beech trunk line would have a peak design capacity of approximately 8.0 MGD based on a design depth of 0.6 full. The peak flow anticipated from the development of Rancho Fontana is 1.28 MGD, while the peak flow from the entire proposed sewered area is 8.0 MGD. The City of Fontana should contribute to the construction cost of the recommended trunk line, since 84 percent of the peak capacity, 6.7 MGD, will be utilized by future developments outside the Rancho Fon- tana project. Wastewater Collection System The collection system for the Rancho Fontana development re- quired for the ultimate wastewater effluent is shown on Plate 1-1. The recommended collection system for Rancho Fontana is based on the recom- mended trunk system Alternative D-3 and the proposed Specific Plan. The collection system within Rancho Fontana project includes trunk mains to convey wastewater from future development northerly of Rancho Fontana. The total estimated project cost for the collection system and trunk mains is $1,630,000 as shown on Table 1-10. The City should participate is the construction cost of the trunk mains that run through the proposed project. 1-27 5.:ou2CC : RANC+40 FONT-4NA SPSG WIC PLAN APPENDO( EN6INEE2IN6 2E DEC. 7- 1982) T Prot6E. I cF -13- TABLE 1-10 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST FOR RANCHO FONTANA WASTEWATER COLLECTION LINES AND ONSITE TRUNK LINES(1) • Unit Size : Quantity : Unit : Price . Total Sewer Collector Lines 8" Dia. 21,440 LF $ 17.50 $ 375,000 Sewer Collector Lines 10" Dia. 2,100 LF 22.50 47.000 Sewer Collector Lines 12" Dia. 1,500 LF 27.50 41,000 Sewer Trunk Mains 12" Dia. 2,650 LF 27.50 72,000 Sewer Trunk Mains 15" Dia. 2,650 LF 39.00 103,000 Sewer Trunk Mains 18" Dia. 5,240 LF 54.50 286,000 Manholes 48" Dia. 170 EA 2000.00 340,000 Total Estimated Construction Cost $1,164,000 Total Estimated Project Cost $1.630,000 (1) Note: Cost of individuallaterals from the street right of way line to the housing units is not included. *Based on ENR-Los Angeles Construction Cost Index for • February 1982 (4531) **Includes (a) Construction Contingencies at 15%; (b) Technical Services at 15%; and (c) Field Engineering at 10%. 1-28 SCALE 0 boo too, 0 0 0 •• 35 MIS SEWER MAIN PROJECT BASE LINE, ROA ID 4'• 8 r N r 12"♦ TO ECN-CE. INT€RCEPTOR. • I•� t; ..1t1 �� 19! :,I• • :I IIj `I. �' ;' PLATE I —I II ;. S. .-•I li 1.i. • : �F. I� • : : HAve.N . • FRo�JE.CT ti ...,ILL • 24 _J LEGEND OEEAVE. INTERCEPTOQ. ON -SITE WASTEWATER GN COLLECTION • SYSTEM PROPOSED WASTEWATER COLLECTION LINES. FUTURE OFF —SITE MAJOR WASTEWATER COLLECTOR LINES. ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES CIVIL ENGINEERS RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA I-29 wO tii-243 . � 4ista� in11l; '14114.114•1 '9 : y 1, • The total estimated project cost of $1,659,000 would provide capacity in the Beech Avenue trunk line in accordance with the City of Fontana General Plan land uses. The proposed 21-inch diameter Beech trunk line would have a peak design capacity of approximately 8.0 MGD based on a design depth of 0.6 full. The peak flow anticipated from thedevelopment of Rancho Fontana is 1.28 MGD, while the peak flow from the entire proposed sewered area is 8.0 MGD. The City of Fontana should contribute to the construction cost of the recommended trunk line, since 84 percent of the peak capacity, 6.7 MGD, will be utilized by future developments outside the Rancho Fon- tana project. Wastewater Collection System The collection system for the Rancho Fontana development re- quired for the ultimate wastewater effluent is shown on Plate 1-1. The recommended collection system for Rancho Fontana is based on the recom- mended trunk system Alternative D-3 and the proposed Specific Plan. The collection system within Rancho Fontana project includes trunk mains to convey wastewater from future development northerly of Rancho Fontana. The total estimated project cost for the collection system and trunk mains is $1,630,000 as shown on Table 1-10. The City should participate in the construction cost of the trunk mains that run through the proposed project. 1-27 RANC14o RAJTANA SPSC!>rIC PLAN ( DEC. 7- 1982) APPENDt)c b G.N611.3EE211Q6 2EP0 T -16- PAGE I cc3 TABLE 1-10 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST FOR RANCHO FONTANA WASTEWATER COLLECTION LINES AND ONSITE TRUNK LINES(1) • Unit Size : Quantity : Unit •Price Total Sewer Collector Lines 8" Dia. 21,440 LF $ 17.50 $ 375,000 Sewer Collector Lines 10" Dia. 2,100 LF 22.50 47.000 Sewer Collector Lines 12" Dia. 1,500 LF 27.50 41,000 Sewer Trunk Mains 12" Dia. 2,650 LF 27.50 72,000 Sewer Trunk Mains 15" Dia. 2,650 LF 39.00 103,000 Sewer Trunk Mains 18" Dia. 5,240 LF 54.50 286,000 Manholes 48" Dia. 170 EA 2000.00 340,000 Total Estimated Construction Cost $1,164,000 Total Estimated Project Cost $1,630,000 (1) Note: Cost of individual laterals from the street right of way line to the housing units is not included. *Based on ENR-Los Angeles Construction Cost Index for February 1982: (4531) **Includes (a) Construction Contingencies at 15%; (b) Technical Services at 15%; and (c) Field Engineering at 10%. 1-28 -17- PPG E. 2 of 3 2 .0 L L lP w •0 35 , • SCALE d +C moo. 1 �L 1,1 1IM 1 ;l•• )II il. 1 PLATE I -I E4 16 H L�1•t\i� .. ... • s +-4Ave-N . • . • PROJECT ;e • • 1395; •LEGEND PROPOSED WASTEWATER COLLECTION LINES. . FUTURE OFF -SITE MAJOR WASTEWATER COLLECT LINES. ram•--ISEEGN AVE. INTERCEPT6 ON —SITE WASTEWATER �1 COLLECTION SYSTEM ALBERT A. WEBB ,ASSOCIATES CIVIL ENGINEERS RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 1-29 wo. 81-203 � ..,) / lA Y rc r• iri'' 1 1 �: ' 1.! ,•1 � r1: r;., I ��0` r 4c � �8 �JII �.. } .7� ifr +ifN.t1•Sy.i �� I 1 i,i •� y�r�J��l{.i�1�,lI t I,`i•, : 1 • i ;, ,► 1 1 I ^ . . • ATTRc�'r-!` ,T 5 CITY OF FONTANA • California MEMORANDUM TO: BOB WEDDLE, CITY ENGINEER FROM: CLYDE E. SWEET, JR., P.E., CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER DATE: AUGUST 30, 1991 RE: DETOUR OR CLOSURE FOR BASELINE TRAFFIC ,4 The reasons I am greatly concerned about closing Baseline for the project are as follows: 1. Baseline carries about 25,000 per day and most of it is longer trips- cross town, commute and through traffic. 2. The local traffic that mixes into Baseline and doesn't recognize the nature of the traffic can, and does, have accidents. 3. The nature of the Foothill Boulevard traffic is a preponderance of local, short trip, traffic. It actually is more of a collector than an arterial, due to the strip commercial activity. The relevance of all this is that mixing the 25,000 from Baseline (fast communte, through traffic) with the 25,000 on Foothill (slower, shorter trips) could be a deadly accident potential. 4. 50,000 ADT or so on Foothill would be far different than 50,000 ADT on Sierra (by I-10) as the Sierra traffic is primarily repeat users in the peaks. 5. Baseline is becoming the truck route rather than Foothill, unless the destination is on Foothill. 6. I don't have a lot of number facts, but I have lots of observations that my conclusions about Foothill and Baseline are close to correct. 7. The potential for rerouting Baseline traffic to Highland Avenue is about as poor. The traffic on Highland is pressurized due to slow trucks, tourists and the dump traffic. Mixing more through and commute traffic with the slower existing traffic would be a high accident potential and make the Cherry, Citrus, Catawba and Sierra intersections even worse. -19- ATTACHMENT 3 Memo to Bob Weddle August 30, 1991 Page Two 8. We have to attempt to evaluate the character of the traffic when we consider mixing traffic streams. I have driven these routes over and over and I am unable to change my conclusions or my concerns. CES:sh cc: G. Bucknell J. Riley H. Childress NATIONAL CLAY PIPE INSTITUTE TRENCH DESIGN CALCULATIONS 4.3WR Date of Calculations: 12-3-91 PROJECT NAME: Base Line \Almeria Sewer Engineer: FM Prepared by: FM Manhole Station (From): 997.00 (To): 1316.00 LOAD CALCULATIONS (Using ASTM C-12 Bedding Factors) Using Std. Spec. for Public Works Const. (Green Book) Pipe Size: 21 in. Trench Width: 56 in. Trench Depth: 16.2 ft. over top of pipe. Soil Weight: 120 lbs./cu.ft. Ku'Value Used: 0.165 rsdp Value Used: 0.75 Backfill Load: 5401 lbs./ft. Transition Width: 5.3 ft. Load at Transition: 6453 lbs./ft. BEDDING FACTOR CLASS D (1.1) CLASS C (1.5) CLASS B (1.9) CR STONE (2.2) CLASS A (2.8) CLASS A (3.4) CLASS A (4.8) SAFETY FACTOR SF @ TRANSITION 0.86 1.17 1.48 1.71 2.18 2.64 3.73 0.72 0.98 1.24 1.43 1.82 2.21 3.12 NATIONAL CLAY PIPE INSTITUTE TRENCH DESIGN CALCULATIONS 4.3WR Date of Calculations: 12-3-91 PROJECT NAME: Base Line \Almeria Sewer Engineer: FM Prepared by: FM Manhole Station (From): 997.00 (To): 1316.00 LOAD CALCULATIONS (Using ASTM C-12 Bedding Factors) Using Std. Spec. for Public Works Const. (Green Book) Pipe Size: 21 in. Trench Width: 60 in. Trench Depth: 16.2 ft. over top of pipe. Soil Weight: 120 lbs./cu.ft. Ku'Value Used: 0.165 rsdp Value Used: 0.75 Backfill Load: 5970 lbs./ft. Transition Width: 5.3 ft. Load at Transition: 6453 lbs./ft. BEDDING FACTOR CLASS D (1.1) CLASS C (1.5) CLASS B (1.9) CR STONE (2.2) CLASS A (2.8) CLASS A (3.4) CLASS A (4.8) SAFETY FACTOR SF @ TRANSITION 0.77 1.06 1.34 1.55 1.97 2.39 3.38 0.72 0.98 1.24 1.43 1.82 2.21 3.12 NATIONAL CLAY PIPE INSTITUTE TRENCH DESIGN CALCULATIONS 4.3WR Date of Calculations: 12-3-91 PROJECT NAME: Base Line \Almeria Sewer Engineer: FM Prepared by: FM Manhole Station (From): 997.00 (To): 1316.00 LOAD CALCULATIONS (Using ASTM C-12 Bedding Factors) Using Std. Spec. for Public Works Const. (Green Book) Pipe Size: 21 in. Trench Width: 56 in. Trench Depth: 16.2 ft. over top of pipe. Soil Weight: 110 lbs./cu.ft. Ku'Value Used: 0.165 rsdp Value Used: 0.75 Backfill Load: 4951 lbs./ft. Transition Width: 5.3 ft. Load at Transition: 5915 lbs./ft. BEDDING FACTOR CLASS D (1.1) CLASS C (1.5) CLASS B (1.9) CR STONE (2.2) CLASS A (2.8) CLASS A (3.4) CLASS A (4.8) SAFETY FACTOR SF @ TRANSITION 0.93 1.27 1.61 1.87 2.38 2.88 4.07 0.78 1.07 1.35 1 .56 1.99 2.41 3.41 1 --,,,,_, ._ j ' 7•1 , - II 0 • . 1 P 7e 4-1_14— i,••P --f./c' le,,,‘..., Si 67 ,._60,.„4 7.‘ ‘"fr-i-r Foil, 6",,=, 79 i ' A 73___<-1- c d 9 4 - -. - - -1 II- "1- 4 ,--:. /e- .0-07 e e.---/- 9C---- T i Pi/ i Z-,....--- Gag, 4 . C CS 41;'),e, / itiN On ck _ '.-- 1 , ey r,___-- G.) 0 ,- 4......-ide. i . ...------- / re-,tc 1*.T / ,A--/ ,.. /a fo- 0 ' e ,./e.„,,A 74(._ id:4 t--e, 7.'e): A-----0--;-< ..— c-e.--, - /A _....- d4, /0 - 2-6 4 ' . .0-e s e ..._.„,:„..,., i ' t 1 /// D e • e . , ve.----.7 dc) Gi2 , ,Z) . • S t _,..-4.. / , .'"6" / .--e ez 6: z) --.. - d-R-114- / . >, Alp s-e., __. _ 3 , ..., ,he , • C-- I 44 ()Miro City of Fontana CALIFORNIA October 21, 1991 Mr. Ken McVey Best, Best & Krieger 3750 University Avenue, Suite 400 Mission Square Building Riverside, CA 92501 RE: Baseline/Almeria Sewer - Temporary Construction Easements Or Rights of Entry Project No. 071-7243 Dear Ken: Pursuant to our recent conversation on subject issue and the recent court decision on potential changes to the process on how City's acquire rights of way, this is to transmit five sample temporary construction easement (right of entry) documents for establishing a City of Fontana form and procedures, as we discussed. Two of the documents I used when working for other cities (Villa Park and La Quinta). The Rancho Mirage sample came from a professional acquaintance. The temporary easement deed format was a sample developed by Felipe Molinos of my staff and lastly, a sample from Mr. Kobayashi, who has done a lot of work for the City in real property acquisition services (he is also a registered civil engineer and professional land surveyor). I understand that Mr. Koybayashi's sample is the format approved by the City of Ontario's City Attorney's office for a recent project he did for them and includes the Caltrans procedure section for this issue. All of your time in developing this document and appropriate procedures should be set up in a separate billing so that I can charge the legal costs to my sewer project instead of the general fund. The attached initial study includes an exhibit that shows the need to construction a parallel temporary roadway along the unimproved north side of Baseline Avenue. I understand that I will be dealing with eleven property owners for a temporary construction easement (right of entry). The private land would be restored to preconstruction condition and should it be necessary, any offers of just compensation in my opinion should be of a nominal value which was $100.00 when I did a similar project many years ago. 8353 SIERRA AVENUE (P.O. BOX 518) • FONTANA. CALIFORNIA 92334-0518 • (714) 350-7600 SISTER CITY - KAMLOOPS, B.C. CANADA Mr. Ken McVey October 21, 1991 Page Two Please contact the undersigned as soon as possible at 714-350-7613 as this project is being slowed down by the recently determined need for the temporary construction easement and it is necessary to provide sewer service to the Highland/Haven project (that you have worked on) via this project. Very truly yours, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Engineering Division Robert W. Weddle, P.E. City Engineer RWW:sh Enclosures: 1) Easement Samples: a. Villa Park b. La Quinta c. Rancho Mirage d. F. Molinos e. K. Kobayashi 2) Initial Study cc: G. Hulsizer (w/o attachment) M. Sokol M. Pacheco " F. Molinos J. Riley C. Sweet C. Alsop, B,B & K City of Villa Park Cirir (-ewer • / 7855 Santiago Runlc'rarcl • Villa lark, Culi/ r,iiu 92n6 7 • (714)99S-1 00 November 19, 1979 Ms. Helen E. Gould (AI' No. 372-151-24) 10121 So. Center Drive Villa Park, CA 92667 SUBJECT: BERNARD C. HOUSTON Mayor JOSEPH E. SULLIVAN M avor Pro T'em JAMES 11. WELLS Councilman CAROL H. K AWANAM I Councilwoman ROBERT N. HELTON Councilman Construction of Street Improvements along the West Side of Center Drive between Santiago Boulevard and Taft Avenue Dear Ms. Gould: Enclosed for your approval is a Right of Entry to construct the transition slope from the proposed sidewalk construction project to your property and to construct a smooth join with your driveway. This project would provide you with a wider driveway and replace the damaged curb and gutter at your driveways. Dimensions for the Right of Entry are noted on the attached right of entry document (Exhibit "A") and shown on the Center Drive Street Improvement Plan. This Right of Entry is necessary to construct a smooth join with your existing front yard and the proposed sidewalk improvements. The City would cover the cost of rebuilding the driveways and for relocating any irrigation lines and replanting lawns and shrubs at no expense to the property owners. The trees in the parkway area (within City right of way) would be pruned to the minimal amount to allow pedestrians to utilize the sidewalk. This project is a portion of the basic plan for sidewalks that was approved by the City in early 1970. At that time a civic organization completed an extensive study of sidewalks and proposed additional sidewalks for consideration. A copy of the Master Plan of Sidewalks is attached for reference. November 19, 1979 Ms. Helen E. Gould Page 2 Please keep the extra copy and return a signed copy by mail to: City of Villa Park, 17855 Santiago Boulevard, Villa Park, California, 92667, to the attention of R. W. Weddle, City Engineer. If you have any questions concerning this project, please contact the undersigned at 998-1500. If it would further assist you in understanding the physical impact of this project, I would be happy to meet with you at the proposed site to delineate the areas impacted. Your earliest attention to this matter is requested. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, Robert W. Weddle City Engineer RWW: jh enc. RIGHT OF ENTRY We understand that the City of Villa Park proposes to construct street improvements along the west side of Center Drive between Santiago Boulevard and Taft Avenue. The construction plans include removing and replaceing the transition slope from the hack of curb to the back of the proposed sidewalk and to reconstruct the driveways to provide a smooth join. To accomplish this work an area as shown on the attached Exhibit "A" would be used as a temporary construction area. Permission is hereby granted to the City, its employees, agents and employed contractors to enter upon our land as necessary for the purpose of constructing the transition slope and driveway reconstruction. It is understood that the City will repair any existing improvements that may be damaged during said construction and will have the construction area restored to an equal or better condition than prior to the start of said construction. It is understood that, upon completion of construction, that portion of the improvements located upon our land and as shown on the attached map shall be considered our sole property. The permission here granted starts on this date and continues until the City completes the construction work. (signature) (date) Ms. Helen E. Gould AP No. 372-151-24 10121 So. Center Drive Villa Park, CA 92667 r}t E cE.vTEP DDP. — / '060. S /5•3G. 4 0 P1 oas v 0 B.P/C4- P/L4.f'TEN /O /3+76.7 C.F. . CAS METER Q/ /l ,22 f E /5' P.<. C OR/YE ,1tPR. 00 SL u,'P J744'r k/ALL O ro 13.9' /t •.1-2 /7' Pet. t.. OR/VE 4,ra SP.P/iY.rLE�P s'✓w' -+' O ro rREE Q 3•a' .44T0? /IETE.# "79EEr• PRUNE TD 29..f • k• p /D /S•12.6' t /Z'/l.C. OR/YE APPR. S<t/.NP J'ra'I Av4IL! ro 24.4' a' 4 o• /5•70.3 0 /7'P.C.0 OR/YE APPR. Sft /V4'LER SYSrEA! ©ro i4ATEA" d/ETER /Q /8.27. 7 t 20' P.C.C. DR/YE APPR. /6•f9 / t /6.6/ ENOEX/ST !. /6, ✓O/N ?Pig /4.3//EO/ r. �� =� UI;ri.!!!IJPIPIr Rwomemisiont II paaar ; as 16"'"Iitiniur.1-4111 01,110a110. iK •1N•••N• LEGEND EXISTING SIDEWALKS PROPOSED SIDEWALKS ADOPTED 2/I917O '111111.". ••••••••• UNDER CONSIDERATION •~::.cf• ;:, SCHOOL SITES COMMERCIAL SITE MASTER PLAN OF SIDEWALKS •taste Plus» f 4 4Oraedad 78-105 CALLE ESTADO - LA OUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 - (619) 564-2246 March 3, 1988 La Quinta Valley Limited 400 N. Tustin Avenue Suite 231 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Subject: Temporary Construction Easement for Construction of Washington Street Improvements Re: APN 617-070-006, 020 & 021 Gentlemen: This is being sent to you as our records indicate that you are the owners of record for subject parcels of land in the City of La Quinta. As such, enclosed for your approval is a Right of Entry (Temporary Construction Easement) to construct the street widening of Washington Street along your property's frontage. This project will provide for a widening from two lanes to four travel lanes (plus left turn areas where sufficient street right-of-way exists) from just north of 50th Avenue to the church property, and street resurfacing from the church property to Highland Palms Drive. The enclosed plans (two sets) indicate the proposed work along your frontage. This Right of Entry as dimensioned on Exhibit "A" and the construction drawings are necessary to provide sufficient working area for the contractor to more readily construct the asphalt pavement widening along your lot's frontage. The permanent paving will be within existing public right-of-way. This project is part of a long range city plan for constructing interim street improvements for four travel lanes from 50th Avenue to Highway 111. MAILING ADDRESS - P.O. BOX 1504 - LA °UINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 • • La Quinta Valley Limited Page 2 Please keep the extra copy of the Right of Entry form and the construction drawings. We would appreciate your signing and returning a copy of the Right of Entry by mail to: City of La Quinta P. 0. Box 1504 78-105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 to the attention of F. Reynolds, Director of Public Works/City Engineer. If you have any questions concerning this project, please .contact the undersigned at (619)564-2246. If it would further assist you in understanding the physical impacts of this project, I would be happy to meet with you at the project site to delineate the work area. Your earliest attention to this matter is requested. Thank you for your cooperation. Very t - • y yours, Fr olds, PE Dir of Public Works/City Engineer FR/lmm enclosures CERTIFIED MAIL NO. P-477 377 868 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED cc: R. Weddle G. Halladay, BSI Project File: Bid No. 88-01 RIGHT OF ENTRY We understand that the City of La Quinta proposes to construct certain street widening improvements along Washington Street from 50th Avenue to Highland Palms Drive, and that a copy of the construction drawings showing said work along our property has been provided to us. The construction plans indicate construction of asphalt concrete pavement widening within existing street right-of-way in order to provide the transition area for four travel lanes south of Highland Palms Drive to 50th Avenue. To accomplish this work an area as shown on the attached Exhibit "A" would be used as a temporary construction area. Permission is hereby granted to the City, it's employees, agents and employed contractors to enter upon our land in the temporary construction easement area as necessary for constructing the transition slopes from the new street to our property. It is understood that the City will repair any existing improvements that may be damaged during said construction and will have the construction area restored to an equal or better condition than it was prior to the start of said construction that the transition slope shall be left in a neat and compacted manner and be compatible with the surrounding land. This permission hereby granted starts on this date continues and until the City completes the construction work. (Signature/Title) La Quinta Valley Limited 400 N. Tustin Ave., Suite 231 Santa Ana, CA 92705 APN: 617-070-006 617-070-020 617-070-021 (Date) • . • 1 fv.. ,• PM '1 /11 401 040 119Ac s I� L - — /41'B/. OJ PAR. / /4 80 AC. NI /?72. 7E PAR. 2 42.80 AC. N!. A.'51 7S 1i.71 7 MINID I14if .# Nee 611.ear TRA 020 -002 OW SAW Coi7-070-02/ 59.11 _tile jili•71 NATIOIkIDET►RiIS INf AT BIECISnO iROM RFEw►iNSiT►iEBPa EAriBOFEiA141(IDE REALESE ATEMEGISTERS RACY. �EL.�ISL tsd �Tii._44�I 1irl_�I PtADORES 70R SsITUS) CAMPEYER _HENRY A .A521?'1 -PALM DESERT, CA 92261 _h ISM El' 1:21 P stl eelEIQSS1eria A 20003 4687044AI Q PALM DR 0 PSAL+ SE412tT 922�,897 7,OOd� SFR 6�740 9164l O?6 TR 2117 w�a[ 399 FMB? , T r JW RjT OAN EL ►� r 4r( PASS DR ALl1 p�sEpT v. 1 29`%66 1 59.50 t AS,000F t 35,000 DAV1S,CLYDE A a212 21 �X 78?'ALM DESERT, CA 92261 a wARk HARRYWARREN HARRY PORT MARIA RD*INDIO, CA 92201 !1i4ti 7 1 566 1 92260 ) 6 �740 Q16 4 L O6Z 7 VTR 2/171,A37.46 PAL11S 08 0 27,8661111,467PALA DESERT 2159,353 0264 El SFR 6 1674516 4 1069 8 617402164`0629 cM4RPNACK GROVER E•EM A `11W*SHINGTON ST*PALM DESERT, CA 92260 ri RRERA DAVID mmARIA �1NSTHTHORN,A 90250 Ali1 10984 9�90 ARD OPERSON •PHYLLISETER 7 J467-5 w5 1NGT86.35*LA 7,�, CA 92253 'w_14e7`5 SH NG6806 *PAL62,445RT, CA 92260 wASHINGTON ,44 RIICHARCSON JEFFREY •SHARON :670c wASHINGTON*LA GUIIQA,SA 92253 ,,1 6331 1 66.000 puuum aukr:ETT 2R91,iTHERH0AL, CA 92274DYS �xa 216323 2 t4LA 00NI USTIN AVE STE 231*SANTA ANA, CA 92705 8?12 220765 20003 46895 MASHINGTON ST 0 PALN498SE2E,S8:21,082 7,000m SFR 290.54 TR 2117 5 20003 46865 WASHINGTON ST 0 PA4M4u� 0�SERI,.1226Q,Rj_ 0 SFR 704.12 zv TR 2117 •emu eW �o�� ��u, 20003 46835 37AS iWNGTON ST P ';si 30SEgi 922 SFR 6 1740 Q16 4 i 061 0 TR 2117 2.�Z o,504 �,�s 7,000N 6 �140 616 4 L 0� 120003 TR 2117 5SR2S NbTDN ST 0 P 330S 1,2092260 RI SFR 78,539 0 6 �7i0 Q16 4 L O6� 2 VTR 211703 7S871s22NGTON ST 0 P27,876SE56,532228i,408 7,0�1 SFR VTR 2117p0MINGTON ST 0 174`7SERI, 22QQ,R]7 0 6 �7i0 P16 4 L 0� 3 SFR 6 oa 420003 TR 2467057012 ALL 850N ST 0 PDESERT,2244,RM0 0 �740 416 4 SFR 6 1 7.O T O- O O S 20002 47250 w2S8INGTON ST INQI�n 5 t 221 7 4.TO7 SFR 4.77 ACRES N/LL IN P0R SE 194 OF'SEC 36 f5 R7E3 FOR TOTALDESCRI 9.54 ACRESIM%LB IN P0R SE 19.2�1 SEC 30 T5S°R7E3� TOTAL OESCRI LAOUINTA VALLEY LTD N T TIN AVE STE 231*SANTA ANA, CA 92705 821 c 22076 1.A.0UINTA VALLEY LTD 4)) N TUSTIN AVE STE 231'SANTA ANA, CA 92705 » C/Cwc i 0 Ei'x 105A*COACHELLA, CA 92236 R 12N 40. VAC-8 6 1 7470408 2002' 14,697,06 0 1 061� o 62' 40.00 ACES N POO SE 1/4 SF SAC 30 TSS R7E FOR TAL OEICRIPTIO 17 617.0 T O - 01 3 17.51 ACRES NFL IN PO4 SE MIMIC MIC 30 T51R � 8 TOTMI OESCRI 7 - 0 7 0 414 30 2000 2 p p LipVAC TAX CODEs200611.58 ACRES M/L IN POR SE 194 OF SEC 30 TSSOR7E FOR TOTAL OESCRI G 15 617-064-006 198? COPYRIGHT w►TIOK+IDETNIS INF AT TON SEIEA E� fRON ANO E NSITMEROPEYet ESTATE fNAT d�4IDETRas E iTEAREGI TER; Ij ACY. y.T-i w►1 1 ADQRESS OR I ) ----- r E � ? R -_ D DfAR TAX SS. AIE_� A __IE5=IQ II L4 Ld_e• S QIYI�14d_C+ACE_QB_ �,LA-JINTAVALLEY LTD 231*S A 92705 820t 815T 3 2349.60 2,136, F1 ,000_ xx USA 617 1�Y XX USA 617 J�l,NONM= eB4�EBIYLDESSBIeIl�1 20024 6 1 7- 0 1 0- 0 1 T 59.11 1 722.28 IN POI SE 02 TAX COOEs2326 1 7 - 0 7 0 - 0 1 8 16014.75 ACRES N/L IN PO* SW • 1% 16F StC 30 T5SR7E 1/4 Of SEC 30 TS'R7E FF9 87 124 59. 1 VAC-4 TOTAL OESC►I 0 14.b5 FOR TOTAL OESCAI 6p o • TAX COOE•232 26.86 ACRES N/L IN POR SW 1/• Of SEp TS3 C 30 R7E FSR TOT OESCRI 17-070-019 200°3 ►0OUINTATIN VALLEY LTD 231SANTA ANA, to 92705 8205 81575 3 2349.60 2,136,000F1200,000 LA WINTA VALLEY 0 00t 815 IN 349.b0E22ASAF1 ;000 02705 ROOMNV CATTHOLLICT SSHOPeE F S e�� CA 92405 13 12459 TH, 115.50 1o'RBbo As ACK RSON HODGE i CO �012Q NlA§UAMR DR*LOS ANGELES, CA 90064 �1p329 4711 MR OR*EOSOMIGELES, CA 90064 to H ACKERSON NOOGE E CO �;8j2Q inii MR DR*LOS ANGELES, CA 90064 A 10ACC4K5ERS8SON HODGE I CO 10 qWWI MAR DR*LOS ANGELES, CA 90064 PT DE MOIVTE PROPERTIES 770,10 411_ Ql1ERPRISE DR NO B*GAFDEN GROVE, CA 92643 PT MONTE PROPERTIES ERPRISE DR NO 8*GARDEN GROVE, CA 92643 77L (HOTT WALTER LILY 46013 Z3 4TE1LEON �liEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 MD iF oAL16 sPALN DESERT, CA 92261 02�P 4 ..t*r 002A R46N 4./0 VAC4 67�Qe70;0?2 6 117 0; 0; 3 617-070-024 e� �� 617-080.001 617-080-002 617-080-003 617-080-005 4.70 ACRtS4N/L6IN FOR SE 194181F' 301 4S8R)E 'BFOR TOTAL OESCRI 20024 7 157.22A o 7 ,1�� 5S116,E TOTAL OESCRI 19.42 ACES N1L IN POI SE 1/11S 04 SEC 32 TSSR7E 20003 47225 WASNINGTON AVE A SI NTA 92253 Rt1b1 1y,R CONN 964. 0 27, 1,978, 2,205,111,bq X PN 15772 20003 6N 42. VAC PN 15772'218.02 0 118,148 0 ,18,R148 20003 80o p �j 21.87 VAC 21.07 ACRESSN/LL IN POI SW 1/478,0SEC 30 T51R7E8' FOR TOTALOESCRI 20003 R19 .A7 VAC .17 ACRES 1N14 SW 1/4 OF°SEC1111TSS R7E 0,OR14TAL OESCNIPTI011 20003 pppp 40.89 ACkES3N722 l 20011 71.78 78 9 6,111 1.76 ACRES NIL IN POR NM 1 4 AF SEC 20011 70. 5 IN POO SW 1/4 of73SEC 6.15 ACRES NIL4IN8POR NM 194 OF'3EC 20011 VAC 1.88 ACRES70.76IN5POR NM 194 OEC 29 TSS0R7E6'1R2 OTOTAL i'SOESCRI 20011 2 13.98 AtkE3 N7l IN POI NM 1/i4461 29 T5143E7'6 ORTOTArOESCRI 00 2731}4M 40.89 VAC 30 TS3R7E FOR TOTAL OESCRI 1.76 VAC 29 TSS0R7E6'1 OR TOTAL OESCRI 0 40,R3-64N 6.15 VAC-( 29 TSS R7E FOR TOTAL OESCRI H 15 617-070-017 Honorable City Council City of Rancho Mirage 69-825 Highway 111 Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 SUBJECT: RIGHT OF ENTRY A.P. # Dear Councilmen: Permission is hereby granted to the City of Rancho Mirage, or its authorized agent(s), hereinafter referred to as "CITY", to enter upon our property, designed as A.P. # in the Country of Riverside, State of California, to perform any necessary on -site work that may be required during the subject City improvement project. Existing improvements shall be restored in kind. The permissive rights granted herein are subject to CITY indemni- fying against, and holding the undersigned harmless for, any loss of or damage to any property due in whole or in part to negligence by CITY or by any act or omission for which CITY is liable without fault in the exercise of the rights herein granted. Signed: Date: ACCEPTED: CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE By: RTENT TEMPORARY EASEMENT DEED Date: I, Grantor, being the owner of the property described as in the City of Fontana, California, hereby grant to the City of Fontana, a municipal corporation, a temporary easement for street and highway purposes, over, under and upon the real property in the City of Fontana, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as follows: Its officers, agents, employees, and any other persons under contract with or employed by the City, the right, for a period of days from this date, to enter upon the front of said premises described above for the purpose of: CONSTRUCTING, ACCESSING and MAINTAINING A PUBLIC ROAD FOR THE USE OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC< FOR THE EXPLICIT PERIOD DEFINED ABOVE. The grant of this easement is for a period of days from this date. As a condition of this grant to the City, it agrees to restore or repair the surface improvements of said property frontage to their condition as of the date hereof as follows: REMOVE ANY FOREIGN MATERIAL USED IN ANY MATTER TO CONSTRUCTION SAID ROAD, AND GRADE SURFACE TO MEET ORIGINAL CONDITION. Except as herein set out, the City shall be under no liability whatsoever to said owner or leasor. Accepted by the City of Fontana BY (TITLE) (TITLE) 10/16/1991 14=24 FROM KOB HI & ASSOCIATES TO 350661411 P.01 KOBAYASHI S. ASSOCIATES 1125 N. Oakdale, P.O. Box 3729. Fullerton, California 92531 • (714) 739-4644 FAX TRANSMITTAL (FAX NO. 714/526-1403) DATE : ii/eQ/ TO: Dll �1 /2/1 (Name) / Compa l �! J Fax umber FROM: E 6laRAWAS/ COMMENTS: 18/16/1991 14125 FROM KOB•SHI t ASSOCIATES TO 3586618 • P.82 RIGHT OF ENTRY Subject: Date , 19 Permission is hereby granted to enter upon that portion of our land as shown on map marked Exhibit "B" attached hereto, for the purpose of , and accomplishing alf necessary incidents thereto. It is understood that this permission is not a waiver in any way of the right to compensation for such land or of any remedy authorized by law to • secure payment therefor. This permission is granted in consideration of the location, improvement and construction of such Improvements and incidents thereto, which it is understood is required by the City of ,•with the understanding that you will hereafter without unnecessary delay, negotiate with the undersigned, and any other person, if any, having any right, title or interest in said property, to agree upon.terms of compensation and that, if any agreement cannnvt be reached you will promptly commence eminent domain proceedings,•:including a deposit of funds to support an Order of Possession; to have such compensation determined. Section 1245.235 of the Code of Civil Procedure requires that said City to give each person whose property is to be acquired by eminent domain notice and a reasonable opportunity to appear before the City Council of said City and be heard on the matters referred to in Section 1240.03Q of the Code of Civil Procedure, which provides: "The power of eminent domain may be excercised to acquire •property only if all the following are established: (al The public interest and necessity require the project. (b) The project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury. 18/16/1991 14:25 FROM KOBA. SHE t ASSOCIATES • TO 3586618 . P.03 (c) The property sought to be acquired is necessary for the project. (d) The offer required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code has been made to the owner or owners of record (if an offer has not been made an appraisal will be prepared as soon as practicable and an offer made of the full amount of such appraisal)." By granting this right of entry to said City, we hereby waive our right to appear and be heard on the matters referred to in Section 1240.030 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as quoted above. We agree that said City can establish the truth of the above -quoted matters, and we will not contest the adoption of a resolution of necessity by said City. Therefore, because Section 1245.250 of the Code of Civil Procedure states that the adoption of a resolution of necessity by said City Council conclusively establishes the matters quoted above, it is understood that the issues which will be determined in any subsequent eminent domain.proceeding will be. limited to those of just compensation as they relate to the property covered by this agreement and no issues will be raised therein or in preliminary proceedings thereto challenging the public use or necessity of the project, or the utilization therefor of the property covered by this right of entry. It is understood that said City will pay prejudgment interest on the just compensation paid at the prevailing legal rate, from the data of possession by said City. If judgement is rendered in a condemnation action, post judgment. interest shall be at the rate established by the Court. RECOMMENDED rOR APPROVAL: By: ACCEPTED: Ey:_ Sincerely, TOTAL P.93 10/16/1991 14147 FROM KO80 SHI L ASSOCIATES TO 3586618 • P.01 . KOBAYASHI & ASSOCIATES 1125 N. Oakdale, P.O. Box 3729, Fullerton, California 98831 • (714) 738-4644 FAX TRANSMITTAL (FAX NO. 714/526-1403) DATE: TO: _ ®A4 (Name) -(371 (Comp C7/ 3yc - 7,3 Fax umber) FROM: loiLY,4f /' COMMENTS : irk;— /ti ite1 r„ P7 L 6Vdt7 soft./ ✓ rd 94a. Grh a Di baArgn API el•040-1,11 2016' ‘1927,0,4ef a/,e,,at e 4114_ 1/4 214e;ft Plit reeh;of /�elr ! i srpiti 4oL, J' 2 f a- Ave • f S .oa.L 403. /m7 d3./08. c'\/1 18/16/1991 14:48 FROM K08pH1 t ASSOCIATES TO 3586618 • • P.02 403-32 6 -84 of independent use. Prior approval of the Deputy _District Director of Right of Way must be secured before either. of these clauses are included in any Right of Way Contract It is essential in the use of either of these clauses which allow rent-free occupancy of State- owned property that complete justification be included in the Memorandum of Settlement. Rent-free occupancy must be justified or it is tantamount to a of State therefore improper. "Until such time as the State elects to take possession of any or all of the property acquired herein, the grantor shall have the use and enjoyment of its surface in the same manner as now used, except that in no event shall any advertising sign of any nature whatsoever be placed upon.or allowed to remain on the property. Grantor agrees to keep the premises in a neat and clean condition_ "The grantor agrees that no improvements otherthan those already on said property, shall be placed thereon; and the planting of any crops, trees. or shrubs, or alterations, repairs, or additions to existing improvements which may hereafter be placed thereon are at grantor's risk and without expectation of damages in the event of removal by the State." In cases where temporary possession is being allowed and the land is improved with an orchard, or similar enterprise, the District Office of Right of Way should use the following clause which provides for good husbandry practices, including pest control. "It is agreed by and between the parties hereto that the undersigned grantor(a) shall harvest the existing crop on that portion of grantor's property being acquired . by the State. It is further understood that said crop shall be harvested on or before and, it not harvested by said date, shall become the property of the State of California to dispose of as it may see fit. The undersigned grantor (s) agree (s) to cultivate and maintain the existing crop in conformance with the practices of good husbandry, including pest control, up to and including date grantor (s) harvest (s) said crop. "It is further understood that this property shall be used only for the purpose of main- taining. and harvesting the crop on the subject property. "Upon the failure of the grantor (s) to comply with any condition or provision of this agreement, the authorization to harvest said crop by the grantors) shall immediately cease and possession shall be taken by the State." 403.106 Right of Eedry—Waher 0syso After an appraisal has been approved and an offer of the full amount of the appraisal has been made, authority to solicit a Right of Entry from the owner is granted by the Deputy District Director - Right of Way. When necessary to solicit a Right of Entry from an owner before making the (`must written offer, approval of the Division of Right of Way must first be obtained. Support for such request inay be transmitted by memorandum, teletype or by telephone with follow-up memorandum. Whenever the content of a Right of Entry is revised or modified from the standard form, approval of the Division of Bight of Way and the Legal Division must be obtained prior to submitting the Right of Entry to the owner for execution. The standard Right of Entry contains the following waiver relating to appearances before the California Transportation Commission: "By granting this right of entry to the State of California, Department of Transporta- tion, we hereby waive our right to appear and be .heard on the matters referred to in Section 1240.030 of the Code of Qvil Procedure, as quoted weabove. We will not agree contest the the adoptionate can establish the truth of the above-quotedmatters, of a resolution of necessity .by the California Transportation Commission. Therefore, because Section 1245-250 of the Code of Civil Procedure states that the adoption of a resolution of necessity by the California Transportation Commission conclusively estab- lishes the matters quoted above, it is understood that the issues which will be determined ie any subsequent eminent domain proceeding will be limited to those of just compensa- tion as they relate to the property covered by this agreement and no issues will be raised therein or in preliminary proceedings thereto challenging the public use or necessity of the project, or the utilization therefor of the property covered by this right of entry." Rev 6-84 1111 10/16/1991 14:49 FROM KOB HI t ASSOCIATES TO 3506618 P.03 403-33 6-84 It is essential that this clause to be included in,any Right of Entry solicited since omission of the clause would provide the owner with the right to question the validity of a project which may be under construction or completed at a time when.a Resolution of Necessity may be sought. There may be circumstances in which the Right of Entry will not be used. This could occur in emergency situations where there is an immediate danger to life, property, or the highway Facility. tinder such circumstances, the Department may rely on its Police Power. The use of a Right of Entry is only appropriate in those situations where the State would ultimately acquire the needed interest by eminent domain proceedings. Whenver it becomes necessary to institute such proceedings on parcels under the State's possession by Right of Entry there is no need to mail the Notice of Intent. As a matter of courtesy, a letter should be mailed to the owners advising that, in accordance with the provisions of the Right of Entry, eminent domain proceedings are being commenced. See Exhibits 04-03-06 and 04-03-06A. • 403.107 Construction Permits acid Permits to Enter and Construct When temporary rights are needed to perform work for grantor's benefit, a Permit to Enter and Construct or Construction Permit may be used. These documents provide no permanent rights to the State and may be used when we would not condemn the rights secured. See Exhibits 04-0347A and 04-03-07B. 403.10$ Temporary Easements In situations where State must enter adjoining property for temporary use during construc- tion, the appropriate document is a Temporary Easement. This document should be used if the right sought must be acquired through eminent domain if negotiations fail. 403.109 Right of Possession Where early possession is required and no Order for Possession has been obtained, add the following clause to the Right of Way Contract: "It is agreed and confirmed by the parties hereto that notwithstanding other provisions in this contract, the right of possession and nse of the subject property by the State, including the right to remove and dispose of improvements, shall commence on — or the close of escrow controlling this transaction, whichever occurs first, and that the amount shown in Clause 2(A) herein includes. but is not limited to, full payment for possession and use, including damages. If any, from said date." 403.110 indemnification by State Where rights of a temporary nature (material agreements, detour easements, drilling per- mits, etc.) are required, and the property owner or other party to the agreement requests to be Indemnified by the State for any damage caused by reason of .the uses authorized by such agreement, the following clause may be used: "State agrees to indemnify and hold harmless (name of other party to agreement) from any liability arising out of State's operations under this agreement State further agrees to assume responsibility for any damages proximately caused by reason of State's opera- tions under this agreement and State will, at its option, either repair or pay for such damage." Easements for slope purposes, whether temporary or permanent, are not considered as being "temporary" for the purposes of this section. 403.111 Confirming Date of Possession Tn all instances in which State has secured an Order for Possession or a Right of Entry and settlement is by Right of Way Contract, the contract shall include the following clauses "It is agreed and confirmed by the parties hereto that notwithstanding other provisions in this contract, the right of possession and use of the subject property by the State, including the right to remove and dispose of improvements, commenced (effective date of Order for Possession or Right of Entry) and that hpossnt shown in Clause (A) ession a and use, including herein includes, but is not limited to, full payment Rev 6-84 TOTAL P.03 • • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM (To Be Completed By Lead Agency) I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent CITY OF FONTANA 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, CA 92335 3. Date of Checklist Submitted 4. Agency Requiring Checklist CITY OF FONTANA 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable CONSTRUCTION OF SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ON BASELINE AVENUE FROM BEECH TO ALMERIA AVENUE AND ON ALMERIA AVENUE FROM BEECH AVENUE TO WALNUT STREET. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) Yes Maybe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X X PROPER TRENCHING AND SHORING TECHNIQUES AS DEFINED IN THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION, ALSO KNOWN AS THE "GREEN BOOK" SHALL ALLEVIATE UNSTABLE EARTH CONDITIONS DURING SEWER CONSTRUCTION. b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? THE CONSTRUCTION SITE WILL BE RETURNED TO "AS IS CONDITION" USING PROPER SOIL COMPACTION AND TESTING. c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? THE SEWER LINE CONSTRUCTION ON ALMERIA WILL NEED GRADING OF A MAINTENANCE DIRT ROAD WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WHEN FUTURE ADJACENT AREA DEVELOPS, ROAD WILL BE IMPROVED TO ITS ULTIMATE CONDITION. CITY-COB.FJ Page 1 of 9 FORM "J" • • Yes Maybe No d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? _ X DURING CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ABATE DUST NUISANCE BY SPRINKLING WITH WATER. e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? 9• X Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? _ X X TRENCH BACKFILL SHALL BE DENSIFIED TO 90% MINIMUM RELATIVE COMPOSITION, SO GROUND FAILURE SHOULD NOT OCCUR FOLLOWING THE PROJECT. 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? _ X X TO MINIMIZE FOUL AIR EMMISSIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR IS REGULATED BY ARTICLE 7-8.2 OF THE "GREEN BOOK". b. The creation of objectionable odors? _ X c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? d. Emission of hazardous air pollutants within one-fourth of a mile of a school? e. Burning of municipal wastes, hazardous waste or refuse -derived fuel and consists of either the construction of a new facility or the expansion of an existing facility by more than 10 percent? CITY-COB.FJ Page 2 of 9 FORM "J" Yes Maybe No 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of di- rection of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage pat- terns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? J• X X c. Alterations to the course of flow of flood waters? X d. Change in the amount of surface water in X any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, in- cluding but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? _ X g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? _ X h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? _ X i. Exposure of people or property to water re- lated hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? _ X Significant changes in the temperature, flow or chemical content of surface thermal springs? 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or num- ber of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT I) X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- ment of existing species? CITY-COB.FJ Page 3 of 9 FORM "J" Yes Maybe No d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? _ X 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or num- bers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell- fish, benthic organisms or insects)? _ X X (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT I) b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species? _ X c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migra- tion or movement of animals? X d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X SEE RANCHO FONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT SECTION ATTACHED 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? X X DURING CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVELS WILL BE ENFORCED BY STATE LAWS. THE HOURS OF CONSTRUCTION WILL BE LIMITED TO 7:00 AM TO 6:00 PM. b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? _ X 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? _ X 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a sub- stantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Substantial depletion of any non- renewable natural resource? CITY-COB.FJ Page 4 of 9 FORM "J" • S Yes Maybe No 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? X X THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE TO ARTICLE 7-10 OF THE "GREEN BOOK" WHICH ADDRESSES PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND SAFETY. 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? SEE RANCHO FONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - SECTION ATTACHED X 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing hous- ing, or create a demand for additional housing? X SEE RANCHO FONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - SECTION 5.2.8 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact upon existing transpor- tation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and/or goods? THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL CAUSE NO UNNECESSARY INCONVENIENCE. THE ACCESS RIGHTS OF THE PUBLIC SHALL BE CONSIDERED AT ALL TIMES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE TO ARTICLE 7-10 OF THE "GREEN BOOK". e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X CITY-COB.FJ Page 5 of 9 FORM "J" • Yes Maybe No f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X X DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE FOR NECESSARY TRAFFIC CONTROL INCLUDING ALL SIGNS, BARRICADES, FLASHERS AND FLAGMAN NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN PROPER CONTROL. A TEMPORARY 2-WAY ASPHALTED DETOUR ROAD PARALLEL AND NORTH OF BASELINE IS PROPOSED TO ELIMINATE TRAFFIC HAZARDS DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE BASELINE PORTION OF THE PROJECT (SEE ATTACHMENT 1). 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered gov- ernmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? _ X b. Police protection? _ X c. Schools? X d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X PERIODIC SEWER AND ROAD MAINTENANCE WILL BE PERFORMED AS REQUIRED. f. Other governmental services? _ X 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _ X b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: _ X a. Power or natural gas? X b. Communication systems? X c. Water? X d. Sewer or septic tanks? _ X CITY-COB.FJ Page 6 of 9 FORM • • Yes Maybe No e. Storm water drainage? _ X f. Solid waste and disposal? _ X 17. Hu■an Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? _ X b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? X 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to. the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration or destruction of a prehistoric or historical archeological site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? 21. Mandatory Finding of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment,. substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? _ CITY-COB.FJ Page 7 of 9 'FORM "J" • • Yes Maybe No b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a rela- tively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) _ X c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively con- siderable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) X d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? _ X 22. EIR Tiering Determination. (SEE ATTACHMENT 2) (See * 12 Tiering Guidelines.) a. Is this project consistent with a program, plan, policy or ordinance for which an EIR has been prepared and certified? b. Is this project consistent with applicable local land use plans and zoning of the city and county in which it is located? c. May this project cause significant effects on the environment that were not examined in the prior EIR? III. DISCUSSION On attached sheets, discuss: X X 1. The environmental evaluation. 2. Ways, if any, to mitigate any significant effects identified. 3. Compatibility with existing zoning and plans. IV. DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: X I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. CITY-COB.FJ Page 8 of 9 FORMS "J" • • X I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on these previous sheets and on an attached sheet have been added to the project by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment, but that this project is consistent with a previously prepared TIERED EIR on the overall program, plan, policy or ordinance, and that such TIERED EIR adequately examines the possible environmental effects of this project. Date: `7- 18 - 91 PREPARED BY: Felipe Molinos, P.E. V/7///f/ Principal Engineer REVIEWED BY: Robert W. Weddle, P.E. 9/�b City Engineer l% APPRO Ardia\ a... I K rt .! d �", Deputy P nni ng Manager 14t CITY-COB.FJ Page 9 of 9 FORMS "J" EXHIBIT I MITIGATION MEASURES Item 4a. The City of Fontana recognizes and appreciates the positive effect that the wind rows of Eucalyptus trees have in creating the beauty and ambience of the City. The City encourages saving these wind rows whenever possible. In this project, in order to provide for public health and safety by the construction of sewers, the removal of approximately 14 existing Eucalyptus trees along an existing wind row is necessary on Baseline Avenue between Hemlock Avenue and Tokay Avenue. These trees lie within the existing or proposed street right-of-way. The wind row numbers about 90 trees on the north side of Baseline between Hemlock Avenue and Tokay Avenue. The City of Fontana plans to mitigate the removal of these trees by establishing a fund for the future replanting of trees along the streetscape of Baseline Avenue. In order to insure that the trees will be planted in the streetscape at the time Baseline Avenue is widened to its full width, the City of Fontana will establish a tree program. Money will be placed in the tree program using the following guidelines: 1. Before the project begins, a certified arborist will verify the number of trees, which have to be removed for the project, along Baseline Avenue. The condition and trunk size of each of these trees will be determined by the arborist. 2. For the trees which have to be removed along Baseline Avenue, the City will place $75.00 in the Tree Program for every tree rated average or above with a diameter of 8" or less. For every tree rated average or above with a diameter of 9" or more, $300 will be placed in the Tree Fund. Money placed in this tree program will be used to plant trees along Baseline Avenue and vicinity where not already required by development standards. Item 5a. The removal of the Eucalyptus trees may change the number of birds and small rodents in the area. However, the number of trees to be removed (14) is only about 10% of the trees along both sides of Baseline Avenue for the project length. Additionally, with the planting of new trees in the streetscape, the birds and small rodents that do not adjust to the neighboring trees may return. 42' �� To �� AiE 8' i9' r� i 21,1 1 � ,,t, i Z-j Tb 9kiL16!!7 . VACS.. 960'1o147 v 'J Gi 4 TAVMi)T Cr," , ii 46 ,c COMPAG110 P3M a5) vim, e ? wPf s TEoWortAW( IMMO IZ •-% Skiss 1•146 teptqw• REMc9\/A L O F . 1 MEW ,1111111,., ii! 111 �Th I 1Z EMOYAL 7 TZ..E (APPOox .) Alf z r Z 1 1 •.f 1 coo �E Eon iI ATTACHMENT 1 7.3.15.2 Sewer Facilities A detailed engineering report was prepared by Albert A. Webb Associates which analyzed the infrastructure (i.e., sewer, water, storm drain) needs for Rancho Fontana. That report has been appended with this Specific Plan. The following text provides a summary of the findings, conclu- sions, and recommendations of that engineering report. Existing Conditions The City of Fontana currently owns and operates the waste- water collection system within Fontana. The City has con- tracted with the Chino Basin Municipal Water District (CBMWD) to treat and dispose of the effluent. Presently, there are no sewer lines connected to the property. Sewage is treated in CBMWD Regional Plant No. 3 in Fontna which is located at the southwest corner of Beech and Jurupa Avenues, approximately four miles south of Rancho Fontana. Present flow to this facility is 3.2 million gallons per d'ay (mgd); the rated capacity of the plant is 3.5 mgd.l The CBMWD has obtained Clean Water Grant funds to expand the treatment plant capacity at Regional Plant No. 1 to treat flow from Regional Plant No. 3. The plan was to construct the Fontana Interceptor which would carry the wastewater from Regional Plant No. 3 to Regional Plant No. 1 and phase out Regional Plant No. 3. Ho.wever, this aspect of the plan has been delayed pending funding of the Fontana Interceptor and the result of Chino Basin Water Reclamation Study.2 The grant eligible flows for the Fontana Interceptor are 6.2 and 10.2 mgd for average daily flow and peak design flow, respectively. The Draft Proj- ect Report on the Water Reclamation Study has recommended the retention of Regional Plant No. 3 for groundwater reclamation. Potential Impacts Development of Rancho Fontana as proposed will result in the daily generation of approximately 750,000 gallons of 'Robert Schoenborn, P.E., Public Works Director, City of Fontana; letter dated December 1, 1981. 2Rancho Fontana Engineering Report, March 1982; p. 1-4. 3lbid. VII-92 24,►Jcl_40 FO JTAKI SPEGiPI'G PLAN ti10. 1 A►sib E NV'I[ONHEM7 L IMPACT 2E Fo2r NO. 81—� SOURCE : CH -A PTE12 N./II MASTER E►QV'IZONMENTI-- /MPAC.T IZ'EPo2T • AbOP1E: 2EG€M6E2 7, /g12 PAGE 1 of The total estimated project cost of $1,659,000 would provide capacity in the Beech Avenue trunk line in accordance with the City of Fontana General Plan land uses. The proposed 21-inch diameter Beech trunk line would have a peak design capacity of approximately 8.0 MGD based on a design depth of 0.6 full. The peak flow anticipated from the development of Rancho Fontana is 1.28 MGD, while the peak flow from the entire proposed sewered area is 8.0 MGD. The City of Fontana should contribute to the construction cost of the recommended trunk line, since 84 percent of the peak capacity, 6.7 MGD, will be utilized by future developments outside the Rancho Fon- tana project. Wastewater Collection System The collection system for the Rancho Fontana development re- quired for the ultimate wastewater effluent is shown on Plate 1-1. The recommended collection system for Rancho Fontana is based on the recom- mended trunk system Alternative D-3 and the proposed Specific Plan. The collection system within Rancho Fontana project includes trunk mains to convey wastewater from future development northerly of Rancho Fontana. The total estimated project cost for the collection system and trunk mains is $1,630,000 as shown on Table 1-10. The City should participate in the construction cost of the trunk mains that run through the proposed project. 1-27 FourzCE . ANC+40 Flow 741.1A SPECi>=1G PLAN DEC. 7- 198Z) APPE:NDO( G.N6i1.lEE2IN6 2E T PA6E. t or3 TABLE 1-10 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST FOR RANCHO FONTANA WASTEWATER COLLECTION LINES AND ONSITE TRUNK LINES(1) •• Unit . Size : Quantity : Unit Price . Total Sewer Collector Lines 8" Dia. 21,440 LF $ 17.50 $ 375,000 Sewer Collector Lines 10" Dia. 2,100 LF 22.50 47.000 Sewer Collector Lines 12" Dia. 1,500 LF 27.50 41,000 Sewer Trunk Mains 12" Dia. 2,650 LF 27.50 72,000 Sewer Trunk Mains 15" Dia. 2,650 LF 39.00 103,000 Sewer Trunk Mains 18" Dia. 5,240 LF 54.50 286,000 Manholes 48" Dia. 170 EA 2000.00 340,000 Total Estimated Construction Cost $1,164,000 Total Estimated Project Cost $1.630,000 (1) Note: Cost of individual laterals from the street right of way line to the housing units is not included. *Based on ENR-Los Angeles Construction Cost Index for February 1982 (4531) **Includes (a) Construction Contingencies at 15%; (b) Technical Services at 15%4 and (c) Field Engineering at 10%. 1-28 r PAG E. 2 of 3 SCALE. O moo moo, •MMO .DYE 35 THIS SEWER MAIN PROJE.GT BASE LINE, ROA ID 0 O • e•* av . e• w ev s 12"♦ TO (C$- E. INTIRSEPTOR. � IM FO TANA J 1 -n v•11 iinnili •I. ' it .,1 : ,, • PRO t-iAVEJE N c•T ti . ' LEGEND PROPOSED WASTEWATER COLLECTION LINES. FUTURE OFF -SITE MAJOR WASTEWATER COLLECTOR LINES. •EEpl AVE. INTERCEPTO. ION —SITE WASTEWATER ,COLLECTION SYSTEM I ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES CIVIL ENGINEERS RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 1-29 wO al-24I 1 ' j") r' ' �J"' �i ir" 'ji ) � � �I'i�i 'p.•I�l { �1 I(t�6 F�3, 1 �5=, :.� �1 lay �iilli::u''��+lfl{►�1�1(�����j�f �Tll��; lfh"Ii,.Im;.i;.,.:� ;},. CITY OF FONTANA California TO: MAGGIE PACHECO, REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT COORDINATOR FROM: BOB WEDDLE, CITY ENGINEER P RE: BASELINE/ALMERIA SEWER PROJECT RE: HIGHLAND/HAVEN PROJECT INTERFACE.. DATE: OCTOBER 15, 1991 As we recently. discussed,. I have encountered some unanticipated- project implementation road blocks which will delay the bidding of the Baseline/Almeria sewer project that is needed to serve the Highland/Haven project area. However, my delays which will be discussed herein will be overcome in the near future and you should not have to delay your Highland/Haven project on my account: As a construction engineer who has constructed a lot of projects in residential areas during various times of the year, I did suggest that your construction of the sewer, storm drain and interim street improvements would generate greater inconvenience to the residents during potential wet weather (winter) seasonal construction from dry seasonal construction. And bottom line, they cannot hookup their sewer connections while I resolve .my project issues. Myoffer to have my.staff and I handle all of the construction management and inspection aspects of this project still stands no matter when you want to go - to construction and we look forward to providing this service. Also, my memory fails me on the best schedule for bidding your project.. The. final plans, specifications and estimate (P,S & E) have not been submitted for my final review and signature and I do not remember how long JFD needs to complete their project. Can you give me a time line so I can better plan my sewer project.. Thanks. Issues to resolve for Baseline/Almeria sewer: 1. Complete final P,S & E (nearly done) 2. Acquire Almeria Avenue Street and Public Utility dedication. The Presley tract map dedicated their streets "subject to improvement", so I need to secure legal rights to construct the sewer in Almeria now as Presley's project is on hold. Madole and Associates issued CCO to do this work. Memo to Maggie Pacheco. October 15, 1991. Page Two 3. Per City Traffic Engineer and Transportation Planner :(informally)"it would be undesireable •to close Baseline Avenue for two to three months and detour traffic to Foothill and Highland. I had planned to present this issue to City Council on October 15, 1991,as the parallel temporary roadway is an expensive item, but Ken :VcVey of BBK on another issue advised me of a recent court decision- that could adversely impact any potential eminent domain proceedings on this project. Therefore, as time permits, I. have, to interface, with the City Attorney's office on how to work around this court decision. In. any, event, I will have to hire a real property agent and appraiser and Management Services Department - Purchasing Division requiresthat.I implement a Qualifications Based Selection process and not give. the work to our normal consultants. This, will take Felipe Molinos and I awhile to set up, plus the potential for right of way acquisition process delays are unknown. I'll have to follow' the same procedure you did for the Lynch properties, even though I; only need temporary construction easements. Madole and Associates issued CCO to design temporary road. 4. :CEQA. Felipeis working with Planning and me in completing the Initial 'Study and. Mitigated Negative Declaration. However, as this document mentions the right of way issue I have to hold.it up until:, I get final guidance from the City Attorney's office. I hope the above information is helpful in understanding the issues my staff. and I. have to' overcome and . lookforward to having, periodic planning/scheduling meetings. cc: G. Hulsizer D. Gee' F. Molinos G. Bucknell C. Navarro J..Strodtbeck C. Sweet P. Balbach R. McVey," 1820 EAST SIXTEENTH STREET • • MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Civil Engineering, Land Planning and Surveying SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 (714) 835-2548 TRANSMITTAL TO: 4// % 44/77W'h2DATE: ATTEN: /0 —? 9/ JOB NO: 6W--/ SUBJECT: 1/9,01/-6 /076 M‘,//26 /1'706/44, 007: The following items are transmitted by: Mail Messenger /c.' Number Description rtviigee y /2elq-P' The above items At your request For your review are transmitted: For your approval For your action For your files For your information General Remarks: 776/V2 /241-17 end%' Copies To: Signed By: 1820 EAST SIXTEENTH STREET MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Civil Engineering, Land Planning and Surveying SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 (714► 835-2548 TRANSMITTAL TO: Gf%y /l/' 1%, ,Yg- DATE: /0 / JOB NO: %V-/ 35/3 0 SUBJECT: », -5-4W% :%s /54'7J iY, ---e7V9 22'17/l�7e ATTEN:/ ,‘104/4" &74°M /Aar The following items are transmitted by: Mail Number Description Messenger p zy / Z?/ 7f PO, /a / 4 4,e/ cz;'"4' elP c ,r ,q 9 / d 7 tz ( ems Alga/I/F/mi W' The above items At your request are transmitted: For your approval For your action For your review For your files For your information General Remarks: 1� 4.P: %�*' 7 -7' Copies To: Signed By • DAILY REPORT 1(( MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Civil Engineering, Land Planning and Surveying 1820 EAST SIXTEENTH STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 DATE /0-/-9/ (714) 835-2548 JOB NUMBER TO. /Elm//26 MaG//YGS / t/TY difl FJ/t/%f "Ni9 s r ry �I/L g/ yV6 d//Y6Jz. f745t/ raNd 7' i) eiYcc.OSE,2 CO/71e O' ASSE51fl/2-.3 /7h1/75 ir//7,cW imzc6e, %�'%1. /3 E%Z it/A-ME GO GrT/O// ,Qf S h ENT! n-0 /p t 1Ns6a/// p-ve FEiaw2. /io, //%E r'Glr7/D/v r Pe 7o4� (-) COPY a T, 1206- 51/0o //r/ (ram mn/,f/ 72 J /1//4E /1 G DV /2 J OOP O/= inwe7x5 Aoki/S /T/0N /P t? re - / fe-7- 6-. 4/66 G'oPY o` AfE V ,1/07)9irL)t e 6-eme-ivT an -id /r /s 1 y k/vDErn srp-N0//1/6- Tdf 1i s/rETc /5 I2Eip 0/11-67 )1 Wu- P V/S c IF 1-2.64fir2.672 ri9'J2 Tee- T any ,Qog/ e i i ' i , d olY I Y .Y 'l ( '/$ 6 Of:- NSW ov7r- 9 n7` igc- ,vaa 4e'7 SA/T l ) Fd izmitaZ OF PEEL ropy TEMY J9fl- nc=Tdv11z 12-01- 2. nl�fr� Ptozrv/Sn 7/17s A 9. q, R/- m / dern f -97 c Ta`' cl0i3 SIGNED Individual • RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION CITY OF FONTANA Date 70 VV - /- 7t c9 — Jiiy PAW L qv I'Sl Job No. By tom /.? / -fo , va3 Project✓-- Organization Items Discussed tliOot E. S 4S So z Phone No /�/.)Sk -- 2s g J a5-41,4, d leGd4 / i- e Qceol teals 10,r- ov�i� f J r7 aleedf A / ^ 45 4A,of ,; a l (4,(d /6,4; illos1. e . r obtQt/17.G /(d / /lI1 _ 1171i 1.-5 C 1 dol.., Auogi% 6[/' c 4. s 6,,r de-2 d Altai; bt d" At.Of 4;u4:16 v, ` ` At ge- wl.cc /& s p4) TWO' Acr/v®wZ 4 a diote frto iter,.,.. No W , S 1ti,cc i7` ,,1 Vil , A As/a-w Comments or Action Required 6' l`° / )-12 I) ran_ BSI-P006 2/80 CAL IF ORN FAX COMMUNICATIONS FROM FAX NUMBER: (714) 350-6618 i PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING PAGES TO: NAME: .T I/% 41 L Q U 1ST LOCATION / PHONE: H4�SS' 7)Le X.1 83 2J'zit FAX NUMBER: (-7/q) e 3 J - d 6/ 2 lc.�ll HoL/ivoS FROM: LOCATION / PHONE: Eitr6'- 7;9417 ,(1-4/ `9)3 SO .- 66 4) ACCOUNT NUMBER: C TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES: 6 DATE: //3W// TIME et-30 (including cover sheet) IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL OF THE PAGES, 3 J� _ / PLEASE CALL (714) MESSAGE: J//7 : Nt/tE /S A 04//0LC / A- � Z &4-Aix P46E5 (2 -) Pt 4T /S c 456 Site/ FiC) Fo/z A-L/9E2/4 h 2i ivy Fvg / S'E- L;NE /P/.t.o/ 2TiES, i3a/3 &J. w24 T IX 72 THE c.4774,rEY 7v P/2-0141672 cc: 7D/2S17S — ITT wiGL N Se:WE / S, ( 8353 SIERRA AVENUE P.O. BOX 518 FONTANA, CALIFORNIA 92334-0518 t� lire PHONE NUMBER (714) 350-7600 DEC.1990 SKY- • Recording requested by City of Fontana When recorded mail to: City of Fontana P.O. Box 518 Fontana, CA 92334 (Attention: Engineering Division) APN: 191-201-40 Address: 16385 Easement Deed Documentary Tax Due $ None (Grantors) BEVERLY A. JULIANO AND PHILLIP JULIANO FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged Does Hereby Grant to the CITY OF FONTANA, a Municipal Corporation, an easement for street, highway and public utility purposes over, under, and upon the real property in the City of Fontana, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as follows: The North 10 feet of the East 70 feet of: By: Lot 6 of Fontana Acres No. 9, Tract No. 2109, as per map recorded in Book 30 of Maps at page 48, Records of San -Bernardino County, California. Said described parcel is as shown on "Exhibit A", sheet 3 of 3. Description prepared under the supervision of: eL40111:-. 4)(7/ William H. ngton LS 3 for J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. i? LE_ Sheet 1 of 3 oNI 6 -/9-96 Date Dated this day of , 19 Beverly A. Juliano Phillip Juliano ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF GRANTOR: STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF 0n before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared Beverly A. Juliano and Phillip Juliano personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evi- dence) to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within in- strument, and acknowledged to me that they executed it. Notary signature Sheet 2 of 3 This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the deed or grant dated from to the City of Fontana, California, a Municipal Corporation, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer pursuant to authority conferred by resolution .of the City Council adopted on ; and the grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. CITY OF FONTANA By: Annivory C. Beard Public Works Director City Parcel No. ,•61-mpL NAY VALEMC/.9 EX/sr R/W UNE /9/- 7O/-40 /6.85 VALE/VC/4 A► 4 FON74/t/A) CA. AVEA/l/E �-- _ 730' . PORT/At/ OLD/ .ar60 UL7/MATE ,e/GVz/,VE/ rrJACr NJ, ri\C 19 ES 70 6— Fig TA NA J me 3/4re gY -4 OE5C4t/PT/Gt/ 0117G [/4' Q Th'E �[/Ff+¢Vi5/AV.Gig: MaZ//44, V. :c 5. 0J4T6 E?/H/8/T "A" O. 0/40 acres CITY Of FONTAAI11, G4L/FATiV/4 DEED PLAT /PAIRCEL AV 5M?tET 5 Lv 3 arAWA/ dY M!1 Recording Requested By City of Fontana _When Recorded Mail To: City of Fontana P. 0. Box 518 Fontana, CA 92334 Attn: Engineering Division APN Address Building Permit Documentary Tax Due: $ None By: EASEMENT DEED (Grantors) FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant to the CITY OF FONTANA, a Municipal Corporation, an easement for street, highway and public utility purposes over, under, and upon the real property in the City of Fontana, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as follows: Said described parcels are as shown on 'Exhibit A', sheet 3 of 3 SHEET 1 of 3 Dated this day of , 19 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF GRANTOR: STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) On before me, ,a Notary Public in and for the County of San Bernardino, State of California personally appeared I —I personally known to me - OR - 1— I Proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are sub- scribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instru- ment. Witness my hand and official seal. Notary signature This is to certify that the in- terest in real property conveyed by the deed or grant dated from to the City of Fontana, California, a Municipal Corporation, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer. pursuant to authority conferred by resolution of the City Council adopted on July 16, 1991; and the grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. CITY OF FONTANA By: Robert W. Weddle, P.E. City Engineer Sheet 2 of 3 City Parcel No. 226-1 Q 2. I O_ 1 5 Zf 9c,s e - Por-,110 =C,o-5e S (tiLi,`t,�r C�� gD6o ifs F-0ni-ct. l 9z33.4 6)se 4 v = - 2-Z6 Po R , - 3 1 2 1 ro-1-ocA - a_ d r s GZD73? 2- -- 1 D 2 [L Gt-7+4X t- iV ek -ov%c i 2-2S -- t 1 I —61 R-:ec7 6t_t-f r C 31)..47t 1,1 fvim3vKa67 �( Zl c ; 5cialt .Arne . q i 2 4—O Fu, MA c("AAr ig R P-r €la5RcF ¢-Z3 t� (-4 -E L w+,' c F1,1 ZD Mopi+,ec,ey (A `ll ZZS--t21--� Fu...J ! vl,o r r $etkz i t7 8 3 8 J% 2- —1z1 --(C� e ..Love Z2_0 --1 2--1 --I (-70-v 1 % o ac)04635.? /1 6, Z 'P{ erk o 1%e 5% lD 5a.w� 2-ZS —tz'- 2.36 e A t 10,1-1-0 5 SL E. Z€) --12-1- 5- cr c a� re C t a 5 7.. 5j L %# mL° S i'Dy 9 / 6 4-- e92 c -erA3/5/ - y� f Q zz8- /02 - 0/0 Z2-8 - /02- O13 2,2/0Z - O/Z 2Z- /02 _ /4 228- /// - Z ZZ� /// -I 22-e- I// —6 L 2.4- /2/-5 z.z', /2/- /O -rc /4//oz 7cr /Z3'9 z-2-e hI-5 6 CO-4,-T23C T PE71-.0tJ rc r- 14402 . Jon., 7.e / -5 44.0),,,s0..„ s , 23/ g/ V J ve, /954 /,.o,L4.a. //r g Cw , 9Z6.1-3 • 5x /10 ,nGlo�s d�7brr` ro9J /Po dal s- pi' t Z.awrsl ° .� So 4, . ,6 4,,c/1,12a4. x Zap /Ar.� • 4. , Se G,/.cr � cG1 771;L ,v/ J cT cost _ - 72!`-A-ice --/v(oiic n. S EST1 / fJE- �r_hs�._tl. Ivor Gov rt6D• at/ /— /104/W>ENT /ze-Pc4CEHENT GvN S ritA, 6,'7)'O,v A/Is vier / % eXT/Z4 74f/4 6'6' t. 1 -76 /0 / cotir7;v)c-?VG/ 2, 000 / 4 000 GON S77Vv P4 i? r . oa.)i 1/0v E/,2 P icf3S 'N sPEc-n ox 2 /, 600 Mof F, cf?onl 04,i/69v 300 1G 8/6 arc 000. /z,000' 2?,00C 4, coc 7.f7 3P /flit) . PiloCE3 /0/0 12fW1 /01 oar _) AP/? E6AL5 !Jar //rapx/.cam oc,AN f a� /S x 6°X/001 �l•�. to /S(/G P.Nr5 Pn4.�1Y GO-61E: zDoor _ zz, 50E /2,G' 9 2, Q° 9410 020 Ok MADO1E&ASSOCIATES,INC TELO.7148350612 Sep 1.91 15:39 No.004 P.01 TO: 1820 EAST SIXTEENTH STREET DATE; 4/"1 / /ids... r 4' / .►, de r7 d 194 - MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES. INC. Consulting Civil Engineering, Land Planning and Surveying SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 FAX COVER SHEET (714) 835.2540 FAX # 714-835-0612 FROM: %OW k/ 7 ° ' MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES;' INC SUBJECT 1 et.,✓e 4-re; TOTAL NUMBER_OF PAGES BEING SENT lie& Izamtaiws ur7 513 (INCLUDES THIS PAGE) lr• 6GT/bA//A46144.7090-n- Paff$P6 d/vu. • G/1//1, T '... IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL OF THESE PAGES, PLEASE CALL BACK AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO OFFICE SENDING INFORMATION. THANK YOU (/z1/v 4 0piwke »=. 6 300 -.yv_o /,oa262) quit- 6 �4.n...er� ' G r, -S imeit7 /)Ak4 oteed /414.“L 01-4 ,SEP-11-91 WED 14:45 Ce OF FONTANA FAX NO. 3511111 Y11.LAGC Pin I1HEMLOCKAV (FUME) 541-16 AXATI0 co el -e t ' Y V ,,,,J ilY{,� A1�Nt�E•�„ iij f I TOKAY AVENU♦< Y �' SCALE;; 1"s, 600' ZO' d 1700' ON 6£: ST T6` ZT daS ZT90S£817TZ' oN 131 ONI `S31tiIO0SS13'831OcWW MADME&ASSOCIATES,INC TEAlp.7148350612 Sep lippi 15:39 No.004 P.03 . . aNer.. ___16-76ye&. . Agit& . ....___jJ4_ fritWeLne 61y _ff-4/9 • . . . . ...&y. . . I• ." I . ' • /4, . , 1 . --...... . er -...• , ••• • - ..• .1" ( , ._..... . . . . . weivrimmumwarmommemonagiiYA.imiAr.— /70 7e orP g_ttfer5 el/ c Ivor "wotofri n-r "vs Tr /1/6-p seprp ....... • MADOi:E&ASSOCIATES"INC TELj.7148350612 Madhlfi 8 Associates, Inc.. TRACT NO. 12314 FLAN FILE 142609 Plan $ 1032 PROJECT r TEMPORARY 2t0w %iI 0- S�% coVV JTATI]N (1 0400.00 4(0400.00 ) 8 00'0G157.68'E (RAD) 700.0000 6025` 1.9'77'51.21' I. 237,.8004 T 120.06 8 191'34' 4e3.89' E (RAI+) 700.0000 6027 +(2+37.80 ) N 70N25i 11.11lE ) 90.0000 6028 N 19"34140.89'W (RAD) 700.0000 6026 194'27'51.21' L 237.8004 T 120.06 N 00"O6' 57.68' W (RAD) 700.0000 601.4 +(5+65.60 ) N 89"53'02.32'E 2772.8233 6020 + 03+38.42 ) N 00"06157.681W (RAD) 700.0000 6017 19'27'41.97' L 237.7690 T 120.04 N 19'120'44.29'E (RAD) 700.0000 6018 4(35476.19 ) ;i 70'439'15.71'E 90.0000 601.9 + 064 66.19 ) fi 191'20' 4,4.29"W (RAD) 700. 0000 6016- 1.9"27' 47.12' L 237.7865 T 120.05 +, 00"07'02.83'E (RAD) 700.0000 +•(3.9+43.98 I::)" :i;is.' :::i.:: PER1METERm 3903.97553 ET 36O' e+t,-y Sep 11191 15:39 No.004 P.04 1.2-Sep-•91. DETOUR ROAD 7354.17652 8054.17508 739E4>.6539$ 7424.8153E 6765.29423 7465.9279 7470.90771 6770.90114 7431..38533 7401.57138 -8062..04757 7362.04901 01:2G FM 7116.17531 7114.7578:3 7349.34658 7434.14214 7668.73007 7667.31339 10440.13103 10441 .5485 1, 10673.43472 10758.35309 10990.23929 2, 10991..67426 MADOLE&ASSOCIATES,INC TELllip.7148350612 Sep 91 11:43 No.003 P.01 rr� 1020 EAST SIXTEENTH STREET MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Civil Engineering, Lend Planning and Surveying SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 {714) 835.2548 FAX COVER SHEET FAX # 714-835-4612 DATE: 67.0 !-- G/ TO: /wP /0104/4/S .a/7y oe fi,r�9w- FROM: hill/44,1rnifeAgMA___E AND ASSOCIA3TETS,I`NC. SUBJECT: i `;0 0/fror't'd ti r'/r '2- TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES. BEING` SENT - (INCLUDES THIS PAGE) 1/6i6"mr 6•s72lo,ere- Awn- TompiAnrd,z-,1 IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL OF THESE PAGES, PLEASE CALL BACK AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO OFFICE SENDING INFORMATION. THANK YOU l'v/76- •` I /'`� ee ��;94/!% /er - p' � I�K V Q. :f� ifi� it ��; /6 r -: 7 e7.. I9PT 2 / 0,i /?C7O" .,y toe_ dos, itpoz eiwc. 0,e74)40,, 1 ,r,/,(..., f r9/1 0 ` ! z(- 9`i P y• r Lk MADOLE&ASSOCIATES,INC TEI1..7148350612 Sep 11091 11:43 No.003 P.02 r- 4701oriri" a77/4ifire"- poz___4/4/6 _ _oleo F_J-$•041I7 ere_64/e//v.a7._ iffig_.42#Afa&,f (4ergemel_rAm- , iderairemt_re-_0150 • ••••• •••• ••• • • • • . • .• gger4f.e..497/0%.e.... MferAeme. ..... . •••••••••• • • • • • • •••••••••••• •••• • VJA. HrJ.7'J4i1TU12 'op LL:1 iteriRe_ifa- t2244?4__. t wifrg-/Y. ./Iita7 fig -WI /OP ___ • . • • _______•__• • ..._ , • ••••• 1265.77/7.. zzofa2ers a _1511'&; 1 er4/7". /26 -eezofi9/of/e- F/arexte 414.?_Ri_17./ — efe _ _ _ • • •• ••• • • • • • •••••••••••••••••• • • • ••• •.......•.•••• • c 40sip,--AiefezvoW • • • •••• ••• • • . -- • 9A//4/ • .. • ireffr.P • • • ••••• /fie yfc'2. P. CITY OF FONTANA California MEMORANDUM TO: BOB WEDDLE, CITY ENGINEER FROM:.CLYDE E..SWEET, JR., P.E., CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER DATE: AUGUST,30, 1991 RE: DETOUR OR CLOSURE FOR BASELINE TRAFFIC. The reasons I am greatly concerned about closing Baseline for the project are as follows: 1. Baseline carries about 25,000 per day and most- of it is longer` trips- cross town, commute and through traffic. 2. The local traffic that mixes into Baseline and doesn't recognize the nature of the traffic can, and does, have accidents. 3. The nature of the Foothill Boulevard traffic is a- preponderance of local, short trip, traffic. It actually is more of a collector than an arterial, due to the strip commercial activity. The relevance of allthis is that mixing the 25,000 from Baseline (fast communte, through traffic) with the 25,000 on Foothill (slower, shorter trips) could be a deadly accident potential. 4. 50,000 ADT or so on Foothill would be far different than 50,000 ADT on Sierra (by I-10) as the Sierra traffic is primarily repeat users in the peaks. 5. Baseline is becoming the truck route rather than Foothill, unless the destination is on Foothill. 6. I don't have a lot of number facts, but I have lots of observations: that my._ conclusions about Foothill and Baseline are close to correct. 7. The potential for rerouting Baseline traffic to Highland Avenue is-, about as poor. The traffic on Highland is pressurized due to slow trucks, tourists and the dump traffic. Mixing more through and commute traffic with the slower existing traffic would be a high accident potential and make the Cherry, Citrus, Catawba and Sierra. intersections even worse. Amo to Bob Weddle August 30,.1991 Page Two We have to attempt to evaluate the character of the traffic when we consider mixing traffic streams. I have driven these routes over and over and I am unable to change my conclusions or my concerns. CES:sh cc: G. Bucknell J. Riley H. Childress CITY OF FONTANA California MEMORANDUM TO: RICHARD COTA, PRINCIPAL ENGINEER 'FROM: BOB WEDDLE, CITY ENGINEER DATE: AUGUST 26, 1991 RE: SUBDIVISION MAP ACT SECTION 66477.1 RE: LEGISLATIVE BODY MUST ACCEPT OR REJECT ANY OFFER OF DEDICATION In doing my yearly "cover to cover" reading of the Subdivision Map Act (SMA) I noted that our final map acceptance certificates may need to be revised. In other cities as City Engineer I had signed off on maps in which the agency accepts the offer of dedication and secured the right-of-way upon recordation. In. Fontana, we apparently use the option of accepting subject to improvments, as per SMA 66477.1(a). To me, this would mean that the City and utility companies would not have easement rights until the City Council accepted the public improvements for maintenance. If this is the case for the Presley tract (Baseline at Almeria),_I may have a problem. I plan to construct thetrunk sewer line through, the dedicated streets (Almeria, et al) of this subdivision to connect the Baseline sewer to the City's proposed RDA sewer project in the Highland -Haven tract. This map has recorded but not constructed any improvements due to the slow economy, downstream drainage problems and infrastructure fee problems. I may have to process a separate street and public utility easement deed along the "sewer line streets" and record it prior to starting the sewer line construction. While I am researching the acceptance certificate on the Presley Tract and review my options with the City Attorney, if we accepted subject to improvements, I would like to review with you and Edgar the reasons for our particular certificate to see what is commonly done in the local area and then get a. legal opinion on the various options and risk management potentials. Let's review this by September 6, 1991, if possible. RWW:sh Enclosure cc: F. Molinos_. M. Pacheco C. Sweet G. Bucknell E. Casasola ant to this section, the county in �e figures pertaining to 04:mew Tall be payable at the time of the 3s may be prescribed by local e used only for the purpose of )mmunity park or recreational an or specific plan containing' park and recreational facilities )r the fees to be paid shall bear itional facilities by the future o which the land or fees are i, and where it will use the land ie residents of the subdivision. 1 five years after the payment )ts created by the subdivision, lout any deductions, shall be 1 in the same proportion that ibdivision. visions containing 50 parcels ive, or community apartment fired notwithstanding that the Ind not used for residential i. However a condition may ing permit is requested for re of the parcels within four uch parcel as a condition to irovements to the dedicated I located thereon shall be a by the ordinance. or paid directly to the local :ommunitywide level and to ich agency elects to accept all develop the land or use iblic agency other than a city to be paid shall, subject to on and such public agency. isions or to condominium f airspace. in an existing swelling units are added. )eratives, and community 3.2, 11003.4, and 11004, Jms, as defined in Section ed by the legislative body, the fee imposed, pursuant pment which is usable for • Park and recreation purposes shall include land ar -recreational community gardening," which activity consists of than, or in addition to, the owner of such land, of plant materi; [Amended, Chapter 291, Statutes of 66477.1. Legislative body must accept or reject any offer of dedication (a) At the time the legislative body approves a final map, it shall also accept, accept subject to improvement, or reject any offer of dedication. The clerk of the legislative body shall certify or state on the map the action by the legislative body. (b) The legislative body of a county, or a county officer designated by the legislative body, may accept into the county road system, pursuant to Section 941 of the Streets and Highways Code, any road for which an offer of dedication has been accepted or accepted subject to improvements. [Amended, Chapter 132, Statutes of 1988] 66477.2. Rejected offers to remain open; termination of rejected offers (a) If at the time the final map is approved, any streets, paths, alleys, public utility easements, rights -of -way for local transit facilities such as bus turnouts, benches, shelters, landing pads, and similar items,.which directly benefit the residents of a subdivision, or storm drainage easements are rejected, subject to Section 771.010 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the offer of dedication shall remain open and the legislative body may by resolution at any later. date, and without further action by the subdivider, rescind its action and accept and open the streets, paths, alleys, rights -of -way for local transit facilities such as bus turnouts, benches, shelters, landing pads, and similar items, which directly benefit the residents of a subdivision,_ or storm drainage easements for public use, which acceptance shall be recorded in the office of the county recorder. (b)In the case of any subdivision fronting upon the ocean coastline or bay shoreline, the offer of dedication of public access route or routes from public highways to land below the ordinary high water mark shall be accepted within three years after the approval of the final map; in the case of any subdivision fronting upon any public waterway, river, or stream, the offer of dedication of public access route or routes from public highways to the bank of the waterway, river, or stream, and the public easement along a portion of the bank of the waterway, river, or stream shall be accepted within three years after the approval of the final map; in the case of any subdivision fronting upon any lake or reservoir which is owned in part or entirely by any public agency, including the state, the offer of dedication of public access route or routes from public highways to any water of such lake or reservoir shall be accepted within five years after the approval of the final map; all other offers of dedication may be accepted at any time. (c) Offers of dedication which are covered by subdivision (a) may be terminated and abandoned in the same manner as prescribed for the summary vacation of streets by Part 3 (commencing with Section 8300) of Division 9 of the Streets and Highways Code. (d) Offers of dedication which are not accepted within the time limits specified in subdivision (b) shall be deemed abandoned. (e) Except as provided in Section 66499.16, 66499.17, and 66499.18, if a resubdivision or reversion to acreage of the tract is subsequently filed for approval,` any offer of dedication previously rejected shall be deemed to be terminated upon the approval of the map by the legislative body. [Amended, Chapter 87, Statutes of 1982] 66477.3. Effective date of accepted dedications Acceptance of offers of dedication on a final map shall not be effective until the final map is filed in the office of the county recorder or a resolution of acceptance by the legislative body is filed in such office. 55 a F W LJ I trcr.,c •oru IlNrwar/ON Iran.. roSl/L Nn) 0/IA.Oa MrtA/r0/YI ICN.OL AA. LAME OLL CASSIA .T .1S: 11) .f a VICTORIA lT L111 ?MT[ IL a MAO JUNI acwOOl NITT.AR R.REIM - rIIIIaILI.Y IL u uaau uanA de.. N/.N ICNOO[ aL GN..... ATTACHMENT 11 LAR00014, IW.MMN IR[MIEE AV. 'I ! 1 mg g x r��/®IIII1I[/1^�pJIII1II'n7 EOM... ""IT nnn L.[.r ` �1WVEIN.. Ind INN fcMOO( J I� II RI] o/IroflL Sift MI [MO. VA4f [LAME IN•N.N• • ILL re�r rro scwu r'oM"`� ruENrll Tfmplv se'+. k)... 46'01.4. LAYC'im.drAip. le At % caHQpw vs� v+tt'M 6''61Aoe0 PM�wI►Ys 'TEMtdDFARY 'bET��I.(3. •-• StE uNe Avg% o' Y II q ..... JgAS11�jA� i%:40 -E r- 0 . I124a a �, 334t04. LF Atio06•el 0 ho < � Ali ATTACHMENT 1 fti11114 ,..11..4 ill A aim n ion 1 Cod !c- !. I! OD) P jI CITY OF FONTANA • California MEMORANDUM TO: BOB MEDDLE, CITY ENGINEER FROM: CLYDE E. SWEET, JR., P.E., CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER DATE: AUGUST 30, 1991 RE: DETOUR OR CLOSURE FOR BASELINE TRAFFIC The reasons I am greatly concerned about closing Baseline for the project are as follows: 1. Baseline carries about 25,000 per day and most of it is longer trips- cross town, commute and through traffic. 2., The local traffic that mixes into Baseline and doesn't recognize the nature of the traffic can, and does, have accidents. 3. The nature of the Foothill Boulevard traffic is a preponderance of local, short trip, traffic. It actually is more of a collector than an arterial, due to the strip commercial activity. The relevance of all this is that mixing the 25,000 from Baseline (fast comnunte, through traffic) with the 25,000 on Foothill (slower, shorter trips) could be a deadly accident potential. 4. 50,000 ADT or so on Foothill would be far different than 50,000 ADT on Sierra (by I-10) as the Sierra traffic is primarily repeat users in the peaks. 5. Baseline is becoming the truck route rather than Foothill, unless the destination is on Foothill. 6. I don't have a lot of.number facts, but I have lots of observations that my conclusions about Foothill and. Baseline are close to correct. 7. The potential for rerouting. Baseline traffic to Highland Avenue is about as poor. The traffic on Highland is pressurized due to slow trucks, tourists and the dump traffic. Mixing more through and commute traffic with the slower existing traffic would be a high accident potential and make the Cherry, Citrus, Catawba and Sierra intersections even worse. -19- ATTACHMENT 3 ' Memo to Bob Weddle August 30, 1991 Page Two 8. We have to attempt to evaluate the character of the traffic when we consider mixing traffic streams. I have driven these routes over and over and I am unable to change my conclusions or my. concerns. CES:sh cc: G. Bucknell J. Riley H. Childress -20 itt( • • 1820 EAST SIXTEENTH STREET MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Civil Engineering, Land Planning and Surveying SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 (714) 835-2548 TRANSMITTAL TO: 61// TT*l/ DATE: J;//JOB NO: PMY4 SUBJECT: /6 ✓//6 / 7M€i10( ATTEN: �&4p6 /G070&//U6S The following items are transmitted by: Mail Messenger )0 Number Description / 5ki/ 47S , i72-eir G12&° Si T/0,-/vf dell,Tu 1 11 �"i//LJ / i.66C1d- A-1449 ,6i (t4/& %� sGiAE / Sizal/11�' / Nai S (mot% /� Y N= 165GH S-7 i167W /10- I O l )P /I ( %R /e=i/%77 / J/7/e64 cTS , /7 /2c i( `< << // / £ 6T/0714 �c-- / 7 5 /n/6 ~10,-i 61 i( %6•Y4C 'L!/G7/6-VW1) 21,06 i? Tttl ?Ipf$I The above items At your requesFor your review are transmitted: For your approval For your action For your files For your information General Remarks: PG,65, SG- IVY%%6- _�Tft�D71O 502E % fifyie,y I'/W n' Copies To: Signed By: _.. /j/mil/ �fr MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Civil Engineering, Land Planning and Surveying 1820 EAST SIXTEENTH STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 TRANSMITTAL 4,7zwirg DATE: SUBJECT: ATTEN : j/"6 /��%®�/!/ ' e5% ��i (714 ► 835-2548 -7"1 - / JOB NO: i 21 ke0,4/-6. ie7/6-lapkv20- 11-,6 % 'G/N( The following items are transmitted by: Mail Number Description t; /6/,t /14S "OW /v6 Nl76. 7771/ 4 �CA�°&'1 (e $f V // 97-/rR- (( 1i 71 ( 7 .sue% // Gl%lG Glo//%%v-T C'r /7c07 a .- Ofe4 "OW g '1 ©62 o% i/ l/ 1( v l'!%'874/e19. The above items l our request are transmitted: For your approval For your files fro �P1,447 For your information General Remarks: /Ps 4/,‘Ifor0z6 Gt/e424-46 L Copies To: Signed By: a, 4J W6Wt9 - _ � c 7 % 94 CITY OF FONTANA California MEMORANDUM TO: GREG HULSIZER, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR FROM: BOB MEDDLE, CITY ENGINEER dod DATE: JULY 31, 1991 RE: PUBLIC NOTIFICATION OF CITY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS Attached is a copy of my May 24, 1990 memorandum on subject issue that included a sample letter to notify residents who live along or adjacent to a construction project. As you may recall, we discussed the issue of proper communication to our residents and business owners when projects go out to construction. It appears that my directive to my staff got lost in the process last year, as I have not seen it used on recent projects. Since we have some new staff persons handling projects who need to be aware of the need to properly communicate, I am recirculating this memorandum. By copy of this memorandum to the project managers, project coordinators and project engineers that manage our design/construction process, I will seek greater compliance so that when my inspectors start a.new inspection job for a City bid project the residents do not get upset about the lack of notice. RWW:sh Attachment cc: R. Holmer D. Gee C. LaClaire K. Jeske R. Bragg Distribution: C. Sweet _. F. Molinos R. Cota G. Bucknell C. Navarro Y. Patanwala J. Riley M. Alturk K. Irwin H. Childress K. Koblik M. Pacheco J. Strodtbeck N. Davidson • • CITY OF FONTANA CALIFORNIA MEMORANDUM TO: DISTRIBUTION LIST FROM: ROBERT W. MEDDLE, DEPUTY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER DATE: MAY 24, 1990 SUBJECT: CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION TO LOCAL RESIDENTS AND/OR BUSINESSES IMPACTED BY CITY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS As has been my custom since the early 1970's, I have either mailed or had the project public works inspector hand deliver a construction notification letter to the properties that will be impacted by an agency project (including detour areas). A draft sample letter is attached, which of any project. fit the specifics Public communication is a vital ingredient to a successful construction project. This memorandum is being distributed to those individuals who to my knowledge have direct or indirect responsibilities with construction projects. The project managers or engineers supervising a construction contractor or a consulting construction manager needs to verify we are distributing a letter to the impacted properties similar to the attached. If anyone has any questions, I will be pleased to discuss this item. RWW:bjp Enclosure Distribution P. Burton W. Franz C. Navarro M. Bilioki Y. Patanwala G. Sams J. Troyer R. Hatch G. Bucknell D. Gee C. Sweet J. Strodtbeck J. McCarty R. Culley L. Dale cc: J. O'Sullivan A. Beard • • SAMPLE Dear Resident: The City of Fontana has awarded a contract for the construction of the The Project will consist of the construction of Contracts for the agency's work are awarded on the basis of the lowest sealed bid, opened at a fixed time in public. The contractor to whom the work is awarded is an independent business person, and in the interest of obtaining the lowest bid consistent with good work, such things as scheduling the time of the work and method of operation are left largely to the contractor's discretion. However, the contractor must proceed diligently and complete the work within the total contract time allotted, which in this case is approximately months. The agency's role will be that of providing the necessary inspection and testing to insure that the contractor's work meets the requirements of the plans and special provisions and the requirements of the City of Fontana. It is the agency's sincere desire to accomplish this construction with a minimum of inconvenience to the area's residents. Your indulgence and cooperation are solicited, and we in turn will work closely with you and the contractor to reduce both the occurrence and the duration of any unpleasant conditions. Please recognize that construction sites can be dangerous to visitors. I suggest that parents take special care to keep children away from the construction activity at all times. The agency's inspector for this work may be reached either on telephone at (714) 350-7610. Very truly yours, Robert W. Weddle, P.E. City Engineer Engineering Division COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RWW:sh site or by CITY OF FONTANA California MEMORANDl1M TO: CLYDE SWEET, CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER FROM: BOB WEDDLE, CITY ENGINEER G(l DATE: JULY 29, 1991 RE: BASELINE STREET CLOSURE BASELINE SEWER PROJECT The Baseline/Almeria sewer construction project will be going out to bid August 20, 1991, or shortly thereafter. This project will connect the existing sewer to the RDA's Highland/Haven project. As the sewer is very deep in Baseline and we did not have utility clearance space to put the sewer on the north or south edge of the right-of-way (also conflict problems with future RCB construction), the streetwill have to be closed for public safety reasons for what we preliminarily estimate to be a two month period. Again, there just is not enough safe space for two lanes of traffic and the big trench. Please work with Felipe Molinos so that we can do the proper public coordination/notification necessary for a successful project. This could include prewarning the City Manager and Council (through Greg Hulsizer) of the pending action. I plan to get a formal Council concurrence on this lengthy closure per provisions of the California Vehicle Code at the bid advertising or bid award Council report. This is too long of a closure for a staff only procedure as allowed in our Municipal Code. Also, I have no problem with the bid specifications requiring the contractor to hire a registered Traffic Engineer to prepare the detour plan for our review and approval. This could save us some time. RWW:sh cc: G. Hulsizer_-. F. Molinos G. Bucknell R. Cota C. Navarro D. Gee M. Pacheco P. Balbach — No4� [ C.0 l c ,Crate • 1P,/ iC/ R"1 TRHaSPORTATIONIFLOO CONTROL DEPARTMENT 825 East Third Street • San Bernardino, CA 92415-0835 • (714) 387-28Q9 E 0 Fax No. ( 4de -,A67 PVg��C EE�o4G \�,\tl //// COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO /�/�� PUBLIC WORKS GROUP ENINNiallIMEMESEM \ KEN A. MILLER j Director July 17, 1991 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AND FLOOD CONTROL UTILITY COORDINATING COMMITTEE MEETING The San Bernardino County Utility Coordinating Committee meeting convened July 17, 1991 at 10:30 a.m.. in the Public Works Group Building, 825 East Third Street. A list of attendees is attached, with a copy of the Department's updated Budgeted Projects List for the area of concern for the various utility agencies and entities. Following a review and update of the projects list, and as a reminder to those who owing: The County Surveyors Office should be notified immediately at (714) 387-4248 of any damage to survey monuments or of any bench marks which may need relocation because of work activity. 2. In most cases, County Operations project schedules can be adjusted to accommodate utility work. Contact us at (714) 387-2738, or 387-2733 if any utility work is planned in areas scheduled for County construction. 3. The Traffic Division requests any utility companies contemplating pavement cuts within 300' of any signalized intersection to contact Gary Kuhlman at (714) 387-2834 or 387-2888. The next meeting will be scheduled for September 18, 1991 and notices will be mailed out prior to the next meeting. GORDON BARNEY Chairman GB:ab cc: KAM/JAS-Reading File SAN BFR NARDINO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION/FLOOD CONTROL BUDGETED PROJECTS LIST FOR 1990/91 FONTANA, BLOOMINGTON RIALTO, LTYLE CREEK (YARD 3) 081 PROJECT NAME JOB NO. CEDAR / T00033 CHERRY AVE (PARTIC) H11722 DAY CREEK F01232 DAY CREEK HENDFR2SON & WARDMAN CHNL F00998 JURUPA AVE F01200 LAUREL, & SANTA ANA LYTLE CRK RD H11718 LOWER SUMMIT AVE F00998 SAN BERNARDINO AVE H08208 SAN SEVAINE CHANNEL F00998 SAN SEVAINE SPRDG GRNDS F01195 SLAVER AVE T00034 SPRUCE AVE (SB 821) H11470 24TH ST STORM DRN F01256 UPPER CACTUS BASINS F00993 LIMITS BLOCNIINGTON TO SB AVE NE C0R SLOVER AVE AIRPORT TO I-15 ARRGM KI'E ARROW PECE/13ASELINE N OF INTERSECTION, BCrIH SIDES 3.7M/N DEVORE RD N/3.5M NEW ROAD TO CHERRY AVE LINDEN AVE TO MAGNOLIA HICKORY BASIN 6 FT INTERIM DIKE W/LEVEE N/O SUM IIT MULBERRY E/CITRUS VALLEY BLVD N/GZOVE PL WLY ETIWANDA SPDG G2NDS BASELINE TO HIGHLAND TYPE OF July 17, 1991 Page 2 CONSTRUCTION DATE 1 WIDEN 92/93 TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN (Participate) To Cane CHANNEL CONSTR ( ) . Art-Proymm DYVE CHANNEL ( _) .-Clete 1Al PA't'�, DEVELOPMENT & RDA (98% done). . Complete PCB 9/91 Complete Cancel To Cane INSTALL CATCH BASINS CHIP SFAL . . . . (By Contractor) SIDEWALKS, CURB & GUTTER . . . . 11/91 CULVERT Under Plan Review DEVELOPMENT & RDA 90% Catplete) . In Progress FOUR -LANE 4/92 CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK 4/92 10/91. BASIN DEVELOPMENT & INTERIM CH. .Some Work in Progress * For questions regarding these projects, contact Proj. Manager, Mr. Lew Neeb at (714) 387-2619. ** For questions regarding these projects, contact Day Creek Project Manager, Ruben Mantes, at (714) 387-2620, or the Field Office, 945-4427. *** For questions regarding this project, contact Field Engineering Division at (714) 387-2633. rr� 1820 EAST SIXTEENTH STREET MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Civil Engineering, Land Planning and Surveying SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 (714) 835-2548 TRANSMITTAL 77/ `/ JOB NO:_ 2_thi / 9 m /- 772-ail/K ATTEN: Pg&/fl6 /4Z/ /, The following items are transmitted by: Mail Messenge Number Description /262? //1,/e eA1-4(71/5- i0/6) 105-Cve/i1/6 722g,tJK t/kCP pfiefi(i-r- /iUc-e,lZw-/ifT//e1 The above items At your request For are transmitted: For your approval or your acti)//k) For your files For your information General Remarks: F-r,./(� / Al )410e J/�jG�'j/%�-(� A Ga C/C67/Y ‘-1 (9 l � 7fr4-, /Y S r¢S 174 y4// fl/7l/D// d �l DATE: SUBJECT: 6Ve (VA/ )7116--r re/ • VITRIFIED CLAAIIPE PRODUCTS BY GM1) CLADDING, McBEAN & CO. A DIVISION OF PACIFIC COAST BUILDING PRODUCTS a f,+ TYPE OF PIPE The pipe shall be of the type known as extra strength clay pipe manufactured to meet or exceed all requirements of ASTM C-700. Pipe shall also meet the requirements of the table below. Tests should be performed in accordance with ASTM Methods C 301. • Nominal Inside Diameter Inches (mm) Dimensions Subject to normal sedation as defined by ASTM C700 and Cladding, Mean Specification CP-7 Ft. Nominal Length (m) Weight Iblft. (kg/m) Minimum Crushing Strength 3 • edge bearing Ib.fl (kgfl linearft. linear m) Outside Diameter of Bell Inches (mm) Thickness of Barrel Inches (mm) 4 (100) 8 ( 203) 3/4 (19) 5 (1.52) 10 (15) 2000 ( 2980) 6 ' (150) 11 ( 279) 7/8 ( 22) 41/2 -5 . (1.37) 20 ( 30) 2000 ( 2980) 8 ( 200) 13 ( 330) 1, ( 25) 51/2 - 6 (1.68-1.83) 30 ( 45) 2200 ( 3270) 10 ( 250) 16 ( 406) 1-1/16 ( 27) 51/2-6 (1.68-1.83) 45 ( 65) 2400 ( 3570) 12 ( 300) 18 ( 457) 11/i ( 31) 51/2 -6 (1.68-1.83) 60 ( 90) 2600 ( 3870) 15 ( 375) 23 ( 584) 13/4 ( 44) 6 (1.83) 90 • (135) 3100 ( 4320) 18 ( 450) 27 ( 686) 2 ( 51) 6 (1.83) 145 (215) 3600 ( 4910) 21 ( 525) 31 ( 787) 21/4 ( 57) 6 (1.83) 170 (255) 4200 ( 5730) 24 • ( 600) 35 ( 889) 21/2 ( 64) 6 (1.83) 220 (325) 4800 ( 6550) 27 ( 675) 39 ( 991) 2-7/8 ( 73) 6 (1.83) 290 (430) 5200 ( 6990) 30 ( 750) 43 (1092) 3 ( 76) 6 (1.83) 320 (475) 5500 ( 7440) 33 ( 825) 47 (1194) 3-3/8 ( 86) 6 (1.83) 380 (565) 5800 ( 8190) 36 ( 900) 51 (1295) 3-5/8 ( 92) 6 (1.83) 440 (655) 6300 ( 8930) 39 ( 975) 56 (1422) 33/4 ( 95) 51/2 (1.68) 520 (775) 6600 ( 9820) 42 (1050) 60 (1524) 4 (102) 51 (1.68) 600 (895) 7000 (10410) PIPE JOINTS The joints on SPEED -SEAL pipe are composed of two resilient sealing elements, factory molded of poly- urethane and factory -bonded to the bell and spigot ends. When lubricated and pushed together in assembly, the op- posed bead portion of the bell and the spigot casting de- form to give a predicted, residual, compression around the full circumference of the seal. The polyurethane formu- lation is impervious to attack from detergents, acids, alka- lis, and gases normally present in sewer lines. The joint shall conform in all respects to ASTM designation C 425. The unique design of the SPEED -SEAL polyurethane joint provides a high degree of compression between the bell and spigot castings without undue hoop stress on the bell. CURVED SEWER INSTALLATIONS SPEED -SEAL pipe has proven its ability to perform satis- factorily in this type of installation. When it is necessary to use a curvilinear alignment due to terrain or to avoid existing structures, the following de- sign and installation criteria may be safely employed: R = 360 deg. X L 9 deg. 27r B = Allow deft. angle per joint L = Length of pipe R = Min. Radius of Curvature Note: when B is maximum R will be minimum Shaded areas may be cast In some larger diameter joints, depen- ding on manufacturing method. When sharp radii requiring greater deflection is indicated, alternate methods of using shorter length pipe — beveling of spigot up to 4° before molding and bonding resilient elements to pipe — or a combination of criteria may be employed. Nominal Pipe Size Max. Dell. at Each joint Approx. Max. Dell. per foot of pipe ASTM • C•425 MINIMUM RADIUS OF CURVATURE — FEET 5' Pipe Length 5' Pipe Length 414' Pipe Length 4-1/3' Pipe Length 4' Pipe Length 3' Pipe Length 2' Pipe Length 4" -12" 21/2° Y " 138' 115' 103' 99' 92' 69' 46' 15" - 24" 2° 3/8" 172' 143' 129' 124' 115' 86' 57' 27" - 36" 11/20 1/4 " 229' 191' 172' 166' 153' 115' 76' 39" - 42" 1° 3/16" 344' 286' 258' 248' 229' 172' 115' vI lz �1 r: 'r PO.# 22s \3 OCITY OF FONTANA • CONTRACT FOR SERVICES UNDER $20,000 CONTRACT # THIS CONTRACT made and entered into this 19th day of JULY of 19 91 by and between P & D TECHNOLOGIES , hereinafter called the "CONTRACTOR' and the City of Fontana, hereinafter called the "CITY': WITNESSETH : The parties do hereby contract and agree as follows : 1. The Contractor shall furnish to the City for: $ Five Thousand Six Hundred Dollars ($5,600.00) See attached Scope of Work and Schedule , the following : 2. The term of this contract shall begin July 22 , 19 91 and end August '30 , 19 91- 3. Payment to be made upon satisfactory completion and acceptance of work and receipt of invoice, net days. 4. Inspection shall be performed by of the department of the City who shall recommend acceptance to the City Council 5. The contract includes the terms and conditions as printed and set forth on the reverse of this page; and the Contractor, by executing this agreement, agrees to comply with such terms and conditions. 6. The Contractor shall guarantee all labor and materials used in the performance of this contract for a period of days from the date of acceptance by the City. 7. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereunder have subscribed to this agreement, including all contract documents as indicated below : x Specifications/Scope of Work Statement x Purchase Order Number J. Labor and Materials Release (Must be submitted to City prior to payment) Workers Compensation (Must be submitted to City prior to commencing work) Liability Insurance, Certificates (Must be submitted to City prior to commencing work) Other CONTRACTOR•P & D TECHNOLOGIES BY: (Signature) (Nam (Title) ADDRESS 650 E. Hospitality Lane #350 San Bernardino, CA 92608 PHONE 714-885-4405 LICENSE NUMBER • N/A CENTRAL SERVICES MANAGER DEPARTMENT HEAD CITY MANAGER 8353 SIERRA_ AVENUE / FONTANA, CA 92335 TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. EQUIPMENT AND LABOR: The Contractor shall furnish all tools, equip- ment, apparatus, facilities, transportation, labor and material necessary to furnish the service herein described, the service to be performed at such times and places as directed by and subject to the approval of the authorized City representative indicated in the specifications. 2. SUBCONTRACTORS: Subcontractors, if any, engaged by the Contrac- tor for the service shall be subject to the approval of the City. Contractor shall be held responsible for all operations of subcontractors and shall require them to maintain adequate Worker's Compensation and public liability insurance. 3. DEFAULT BY CONTRACTOR: Failure to comply with any of the terms and/or conditions of this contract shall constitute default by the Contractor. 4. CONTRACT AMENDMENT No amendment to this Agreement, including changes in the services required, shall be binding unless in writing and signed by both parties. 5. DOCUMENT CONFLICT: In case of conflict between specifications and drawings and/or actual site conditions, work shall immediately cease until the conflict is resolved by a City representativew. 6. WORKMEN: (a) Contractor shall at all times enforce strict discipline and good order among his employees and shall not employ any unfit person or anyone not skilled in work assigned to him. (b) Any person in the employ of the Contractor whom the City may deem incompetent or unfit shall be dismissed from work and shall not again be employed except with written consent of the City. 7. SUBSTITUTIONS: No substitutions of materials specified shall be made without the prior approval of the City. 8. CONTRACTOR SUPERVISION: Contractor shall provide competent supervision of personnel employed on the job, use of equipment and quality of workmanship. Contractor guarantees that all work performed under this Agreement shall be done in a good and workmanlike manner that is satisfactory to the City and consistent with applicable standards in the industry. 9. PROTECTION OF WORK AND PROPERTY: The Contractor shall erect and properly maintain at all times, as required by conditions and pro- gress of work, all necessary safeguards, signs, barriers, lights and watch- men for protection of workmen and the public and shall post danger signs warning against hazards created by such features in the course of con- struction. In an emergency affecting life and safety of life or work or of adjoining property, Contractor, without special instruction or authoriza- tion from the City, is hereby permitted to act, at his discretion, to prevent such threatened loss or injury. City representatives may inspect the site at any time and may immediately suspend all work until safety require- ments are met. 10. ACCESS TO WORK: City representatives shall at all times have access to work, wherever it is in preparation or progress. Contractor shall pro- vide safe and proper facilities for such access. 11. ASSIGMENT OF CONTRACT AND/OR PURCHASE ORDER: The Con- tractor shall not assign or transfer by operation of law or otherwise any or all of its rights, burdens, duties or obligations without the prior written consent of the City. 12. FORCE MAJEURE CLAUSE: The parties to the Agreement shall be excused from performance thereunder during the time and to the extent that they are prevented from obtaining, delivering or performing by act of God, fire, strike, loss or shortage of transportation facilities, lock -out, commandeering of materials, products, plants or facilities by the govern- ment, when satisfactory evidence thereof is presented to the City, pro- vided that it is satisfactorily established that the non-performance is not due to the fault or neglect of the party not performing. 13. HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSE: The Contractor shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend, at the contractor's expense, the City and its of- ficers, agents, and employees from and against any and all liability, judg- ments, costs, damages, claims, losses, demands, causes of action, and expenses, of any', nature whatsoever, including attorneys' fees, resulting from or attributable to any act, omission, negligence, or breach of this Agreement by the contractor or his officers, agents, employees, indepen- dent contractors or subcontractors. Such indemnification shall cover death or bodily injury to any person; injury to, loss, or theft of property; injury arising from the furnishing or use of any copyrighted or uncopy- righted composition, secret process, or patented or unpatented inven- tion; or any other type of injury, whether such injury or damage occurs on or off city prgpery. 14. INSURANCE: The Contractor shall maintain adequate insurance to pro- tect him from clailns under Worker's Compensation Acts, and from claims or damages froni personal injury, including death, and damage to pro- perty, which may arise from operations under the contract. The supplier may be required to file with the City, certificates of insurance. Failure to furnish such evidence, if required, may be considered default of the Contractor. 15. PAYMENT Unless otherwise specified, the Contractor shall render in- voices in duplicalte for materials delivered or services performed under the contract. The City shall make payment for materials, supplies, or other services supplied under this contract within a reasonable and proper time after acceptance thereof by the authorized City representative. 16. PERMITS AND LICENSES: The Contractor and all of his employees or agents shall secdre and maintain in force such licenses and permits as are required by l*w, in connection with the furnishing of materials, sup- plies or services herein listed. 17. CONTRACTOR NOT OFFICER, EMPLOYEE OR AGENT OF CITY: While engaged in carrying out the terms and conditions of the contract, the Contractor is an independent contractor, and not an officer, employee or agent of the City. 18. ANTI-DISCRIMInIATION: Contractor shall comply with all applicable California and federal laws prohibiting discrimination in employment and shall not discriminate against persons because of the race, religious creed, color, natienal origin, ancestry, physical handicap, medical condi- tion, marital statds, or sex of such persons, except as provided in Sec- tion 12940 of the Government Code. Contractor shall require such com- pliance by all subcontractors hired by him under this Agreement. 19. LABOR CODE: Qontractor shall comply with the appliable provisions of the Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Ch. 1, Articles 1-5, including the pay- ment of the general prevailing rates. Copies of the prevailing rate per diem wages are on file in the City's Purchasing Office. Contractor shall (maintain for audit by the City, certified payroll records applicable to this' contract, starting wage rates, trades, payments made, and employee signatures. Copies of these records shall be furnished to the City upon request. 20. CLEAN-UP: Debris shall be removed from the premises. Job site shalt be free from debr s at all times when work is not actually being performed. 21. TERMINATION: The contract may be terminated by either party upon 30 days notice given in writing by one party to the other. Both parties will perform in acpordance with the contract prior to the effective termina- tion date. Nothing contained herein shall diminish the right of the City to cancel, immediately and without prior notice, the contract for cause without penalty Or liability on the part of the City. 22. ENTIRE AGREENu1ENT: This contract constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties conceming the subject matter hereof and supersedes all agreements, representations, statements, promises, and understand- ings, whether oral or written, with respect to the subject matter hereof. July 18, 1991 Mr. Clyde Sweet CITY OF FONTANA Public Works Department 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, CA 92335 P&D Technologies 650 E. Hospitality Lane Suite 350 San Bernardino, CA 92408 FAX 714/885-0676 714 / 885-4405 Planning Engineering Transportation Environmental Economics Landscape Architecture An Employee -owned Company Subject: PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR PROPOSED RAISED MEDIAN ON FONTANA AVENUE EAST OF CITRUS AVENUE Fontana, California Dear Mr. Sweet: Pursuant to your request P&D Technologies is pleased to present this proposal to furnish engineering design services for the proposed raised median on Fontana Avenue immediately east of Citrus Avenue in the City of Fontana, California. Our understanding of the work to be completed includes design and preparation of the plans, specifications and cost estimate (PS&E) for the proposed median island. Included herein is the delivery schedule, project personnel and fixed price quotation for this project. The specific tasks we propose to complete are presented in the following Scope of Work. SCOPE OF WORK The specific work tasks to be provided on this project are as follows: Task 1.0 - Pre -Design Meetings Meet with city staff to refine the specific project scope and client desires. The meeting will result in identification of key contacts, unresolved issues and project scheduling. • Page Two CITY OF FONTANA July 18, 1991 Task 2.0 - Research/Field Review A thorough search of available records will be conducted to acquire relevant data to assist in the design of the project. The information accumulated will include as -built drawings, utility information and proposed street improvement plans. A field review of the project site will be conducted to augment the as -built plans and to photograph potential problem areas or items which need special attention. Please note that this proposal does not include field survey of the project site. It is assumed the City will provide necessary field survey information for establishment of vertical controls. Task 3.0 - Street Improvement Plan A street improvement plan detailing the median island construction will be prepared on City of Fontana base sheets at a scale of 1" = 20'. In addition to the street improvements, the plan will address replacement of traffic signal vehicle detector loops and roadway signing/striping modification associated with the median installation. Landscape- and irrigation improvements within the proposed median are not included as part of this proposal. We anticipate one plan sheet will be required for the project and a title sheet will not be provided. The street improvement plan will be prepared in accordance with the standards set forth by the City of Fontana. Task 4.0 - Specifications and Cost Estimate Specification and Bid documents, relating to the proposed street improvements, will be prepared for the project. The Specifications will be prepared in accordance with the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (Green Book). Preliminary cost estimates will be prepared for, the proposed improvements and included with the first plan check submittal. Final construction cost estimates will be prepared based on the final improvement plans. Task 5.0 - Plan Submittal Preliminary plans will be sent to all effected utility companies in the project area to verify locations of their facilities and address possible conflicts between the proposed street improvements and the utilities. P&D will provide five (5) sets of plans, special provisions and cost estimates for each plan check submittal. Upon approval P&D will provide one (1) set of photo -ready specifications/ cost estimate and the original plan to City for your permanent records. Page Three CITY OF FONTANA July 18, 1991 DELIVERY SCHEDULE P&D Technologies is prepared to begin work on this project immediately and preliminary PS&E will be completed in two weeks (10 working days) following receipt of your notice to proceed. Final PS&E will be completed in one week (5 working days) following the receipt of plan checks from the city. PROJECT PERSONNEL The project will be handled by the P&D Technologies San Bernardino office. Mr. Mark Darkest will be project manager for this engagement and will be the primary contact between the City and P&D. Mr. Peter J. McMahon, Vice President, will act as Principle -in - Charge for this engagement and Mr. Matt Stepien, Director of Engineering, will be responsible for Quality Control. PROJECT FIXED PRICE QUOTATION P&D Technologies has carefully analyzed the proposed project. Based on this analysis, field review of the project site and our previous experience on other engineering design projects, we have established a fixed price of $5,600.00 (Five Thousand Six Hundred dollars) for this project. We appreciate the opportunity to prepare this proposal and look forward to providing the engineering design services to you. Should you have any questions, please feel free to telephone Mark Diercks at (714) 885-4405. Very truly yours, P&D TECHNOLOGIES -tiff Peter J. McMahon, Ph.D., P.E. Vice President • • 7�11`7 / / al eiiy 44( ,7) ---> ' Peel S die h oes0,51--- �t.� �.s,�� s •. i‘ rz• A)Z1—.//44.,.s—,1 �,r�.y eys�f rye 2. Di Q" * / " s'L 3 . ISO) /7rLA-e__ _ Pah `)4 tom) c cs-e- 1/.41:e>r,1 WithilA7tal g ciCr* ?"17,77, - c—Ek it , �'ste.4-4 s;Pc-i.Z Old �fp 1 Sirm(°4A1/\2._/1,_ ,JJ TICOR TITLE INS ANCE From: Barbara Lopez Senior Subdivision Title Officer /J% LJ MrL a YA ; 67evi-( Oeder v Subject: Legislation regarding Notary Acknowledgments The 1990 Legislative Session has produced significant changes in the Civil Code relative to the Notarial Acknowledgment forms used in this State. A generic or general form has been adopted which is intended to replace most all other forms. The following forms of acknowledgment, any combination or variation, have been repealed in favor of the new generic version: Individual Acknowledgment Corporate Acknowledgment Partnership Acknowledgment Public Corporation, Agency, or Political Subdivision Acknowledgment and Attorney in Fact Acknowledgment The Witness Acknowledgment was not deleted from the law and remains valid, however, the wording in the form will be amended to include the generic language. Despite the general language of the new acknowledgment, we must continue to set up the document signature lines appropriately, ie., "Mary Jones, by John Jones, her attorney in fact" or ABC Company, Inc., by Carol Smith President and Peter Smith, Vice President." The new legislation does, however, eliminate the need for a double notary acknowledgment on the same person when, for example, Mr. Smith signs as an individual as well as the general partner of a partnership. Only one generic acknowledgment would be required in this example. These changes become effective on January 1, 1991, however, any acknowledgment taken prior to January•1,1992, that conforms to the applicable provisions of the f er law, will be valid and acceptable. Copies of the new Notary Acknoww edgments are shown on Exhibit A attached. R.#50 41, 71/ ThiE�c Z / 7 9�/ram ,ymay p. giY-R ysil /7/ v/9/' W Tee N,, 7?a v,9'- /1 i7r9,y° g0O/ 7/e/r/ / 77/46/2 y /C'Gri 9N//4 TU G'$ //',� ''��J /�/z/r'S Ticor Tttle fnsuranw Company of a m' i '/��� ' ' /9 // (sg Liefi/b-s 340 Fourth Street, P.O. Box 921, San Bernardino, California 92403 (714) 885-9975 FAX (714) 884-9856 • 9/ f EXHIBIT "A" . • CAT.NO. NN01496 TO 2930 (12.90) (General Acknowledgment) State of California County of I SS. On before me, personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the bests of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature CAT NO. NN01491 TO 2931 (12-90) (Witness Acknowledgement) STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ISS. (This area for official notarial seal) On before me, personally appeared personally known tone to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument. or proved to be such - _ . __ ��._�.. yyr _ ._ .�s:�-�4� and that said witness was present and NW personally known to said witness to be the seme person(s) described in and whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within and annexed instrument as a party thereto. and -acknowledged to said affiant that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and 'that by his/her/their signature(s) on the Instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted. executed the Instrument, and that affiant subscribed his/her name to the within Instrument as a Witness. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signed (This area for official notarial seal) A Non -Profit Educational Organization • NA!IONAL NOTARY ASSCIATION 8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184, Canoga Park, CA 91304-7184 Telephone: (818) 713-4000, FAX: (818) 713-0842 IMPORTANT MEMORANDUM March 1,1991 TO: ALL CALIFORNIA NOTARIES FROM: Charles N. Faerber Vice President, Legislative Affairs National Notary Association RE: An Update On California's New Notary Laws MILTON G. VALERA President DEBORAH M. THAW Executive Director CHARLES N. FAERBER Vice President LINDA L. BAZAR Vice President, Finance RAYMOND C. ROTHMAN Founder The office of Notary Public in California is undergoing major changes that will, in the next few months, directly affect you and all of the state's 150,000 Notaries. No longer will Notaries be able to "just go through the motions" in qualifying for a commission, obtaining a seal, and filling out a certificate. The Notary Public system in California, already the most rigorous and respected in the country, is becoming even more rigorous. For example... * A tough, new, proctored examination will replace the current 15-question, true - false test that already some 20 percent of all applicants are failing. * Two major administrative changes in the Notary Division — the appointments of David Pitman as new division head and James Randall as new head of the Notary investigators — are expected to result in further cracking down on slipshod and negligent Notaries. * Stricter requirements for obtaining a Notary seal will be established in a few months. * The second phase of a new law creating a new "all-purpose" acknowledgment certificate, which to date has caused tremendous confusion among the state's Notaries, will take effect January 1, 1992. We recognize that the state's current economic plight makes it difficult for the Notary Public Division to directly inform every Notary of all changes and developments. As a result, and in the public interest, the NNA is taking steps to keep you abreast of all new notarial developments in the state by distributing important memorandums such as this one, intensifying our educational seminar programs and expanding the NNA's annual national conference to include all the important Califor- nia issues. J A New Examination For Notaries: State officials are aiming for January 1, 1992, to start adminis- tering a radically different test to Notary commission applicants. The written examination will be proctored and conducted at regular intervals at an expected 15 or 16 sites throughout California. The format of the exam has yet to be finalized, but it is expected to consist of about 25 questions. These questions, officials indicate, will pertain to actual notarial practices and procedures and not be based on "hair-splitting points of law" — a frequent criticism of the current 15- question, true -false exam. On February 6, this new Notary test program went out for bid by private test -proctoring firms — including, reportedly, the Princeton, New Jersey -based organization supervising the well-known SAT college entrance exam. Public hearings on the new exam procedure and limited pilot testing will precede full statewide implementation of the program. Notaries will not be allowed to reapply early for new commissions to avoid the tougher examination, a state spokesman told the NNA. Administrative Changes In The Notary Division: Effective last July 31, the new fee for first-time Notary commission applicants is $47—$20for commissioning plus $27 for fingerprint analysis by the California Department of Justice. Notaries who apply for new commissions within 90 days after current commission expiration need not be fingerprinted again and need only pay the Secretary of State $20. (An additional fee must be paid for filing the oath and bond with the county clerk.) David Pitman is the new chief of the California Secretary of State's Notary Public Division, succeeding James Randall, who will head the state's team of Notary investigators. Formerly head of the Political Reform Division and, later, assistant chief of the Elections Division, Pitman assumed control of the Notary Division January 1. His predecessor, Randall, will supervise three law -enforcement investigators who screen the back- grounds of Notary commission applicants, investigate complaints against Notaries, and spot-check for compliance with Notary laws. California is the only state in the country to have full-time investigators exclusively under the direction of the Notary Public Division, evidence of Secretary of State March Fong Eu's determination to have the most effective Notary program in the U.S. and to reduce fraud and Notary negligence in the state. New Notary Seal Requirements: Effective January 1, 1992, a new format for the California Notary seal will be phased in, along with new and more rigorous procedures for obtaining a seal and for reporting a lost or damaged seal. (These new requirements were enacted by Assemblyman Curtis Tucker, Jr.'s AB 1593, which became Government Code Section 8207.1 through 8207.4.) Two sequential identification numbers will be added to the Notary seal — one for the Notary and one for the seal manufacturer or vendor, who must now be licensed by the state. • . To obtain a seal, every California Notary who is commissioned or recommissioned on or after January 1, 1992, must present a certificate of authorization from the Secretary of State to the seal manufacturer or vendor. If a Notary seal is procured without this certificate, the procurer and vendor may each be fined $1,500 by the state attorney general, and criminal prosecution may be initiated. Upon receiving the certificate of authorization from the Notary, the vendor will record the vendor ID number on the certificate, affix a sample impression of the new seal, retain a photocopy of the certificate, and the original will then be sent back to the Secretary of State for safekeeping. Phase -in of the "new -style" seal will take four years. By January 1, 1996, every Notary in California must use a seal bearing ID numbers for both Notary and seal vendor. Notaries with current commissions are not required to get a new -style seal unless they apply for a new commission after December 31, 1991. The new seal law also states: "Any notary whose official seal is lost, misplaced, destroyed, broken, damaged, or is rendered otherwise unworkable shall immediately mail or deliver written notice of that fact to the Secretary of State. The Secretary of State, within five working days after receipt of the notice, if requested by a notary, shall issue a certificate of authorization which a notary may use to obtain a replacement seal." It remains to be seen whether the Notary Public Division will apply this quoted provision to all or just to new -style Notary seals. New Acknowledgment Certificates Required: The NNA's recently distributed "White Paper" on California notarial certificates explained in detail the considerable impact of Senator John Seymour's SB 2251. To recap, the new statute has two main effects. First, it provides an "all-purpose" acknowledgment certificate that, starting January 1, 1991, may be used in place of any other acknowledgment form, including the five certificates currently prescribed by statute. Second, the bill outlaws the five current statutory forms, effective January 1, 1992. These certificates are for individuals, corporations, partnerships, attorneys -in -fact, and for public corporations, agencies and political subdivisions (Civil Code Sections 1189, 1190, 1190a, 1191 and 1192). Either the new all-purpose form or the five current forms may be used by California Notaries (and other officials with notarial powers) for a full year, from January 1, 1991, through December 31, 1991. Starting January 1, 1992, however, only the new all-purpose form will be allowed. In the first phase of its implementation, two major problems have arisen with SB 2251, both based on misreading of its provisions: (1) Mistakenly, some county recorders are refusing to accept any acknowledgment certificate but the new all-purpose form. They are in error, for the new law allows continued use of certificates prescribed by Civil Codes Sections 1189, 1190, 1190a, 1191 and 1192, and other substantially similar forms, at least through December 31, 1991. (It remains to be seen whether use of these forms after that date will be authorized. Official resolution of the issue may have to await an attorney general's opinion, a court ruling or clarifying legislation.) • • (2) At least one computer document service supplying legal forms to banks has been using an earlier version of the all-purpose certificate that was changed with enactment of SB 2251 and is now unauthorized. Here is the proper form: ALL-PURPOSE CERTIFICATE State of California County of On before me, (here insert name and title of the officer), personally appeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evi- dence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowl- edged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (Seal) The main failing of the earlier ("wrong") certificate — and the reason it was changed — was its lack of clarity about "the signature point" and "Capacity of Signatory." There was confusion over whether these terms applied to the document signer or to the Notary. We have heard from several California attorneys about the all-purpose certificate. Acknowledging the NNA's reservations about the new form's lack of specificity, Beverly Hills attorney Harvey S. Howard still recommends that the all-purpose form be used because it creates a "statutory presumption" that the document was duly executed. According to Howard, the Notary need no longer worry about such matters as whether one or two corporate officers must sign in a given instance, since the new form covers all contingencies for incorporated and unincorporated entities with just one signature. (See new Civil Code Section 1190.) In addition, Palo Alto attorney John M. Donegan brought to our attention a potential problem with SB 2251 involving documents notarized before January 1, 1992, that are recorded after that date. In such cases, will the absence of an all-purpose certificate cause a document's rejection by a recorder? This and other questions await definitive resolution. NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION A Non -Profit Educational Organization 8236 Remmet Avenue, P.O. Box 7184, Canoga Park, CA 91304-7184 Telephone: (818) 713-4000 3312.021 Agenda January 10, 1991 2:00 p.m. Highland Haven Target Area North Fontana A. Update on Agency's Highland Haven Infrastructure Plan; B. Status of Presley Project/List of Unresolved Concerns: (u se L-i 1. Sewer connection - Presley was to construct sewer line from Beech/EasOrii.1 to Almeria. Almeria would serve as a connection point for Highland Haven. Presley paid up to $700,000 in sewer fees for the Foothill/Beech and Almeria line. They have drafted a Reimbursement Agreement (see attached) for the City's review. What is status of these funds? If Presley does not move forward on their Project, will the City fund the construction of the sewer line from Beech/Foothill to Almeria? Acquisition of needed right-of-way for the extension of Walnut - Presley alleges receiving direction from City Staff to make an offer to purchase to one property owner at City's expense. The offer did not include the proper property acquisition needed to achieve the Walnut extension. 2. Presley will not move forward due to the North Fontana Infrastructure Plan ($150,000 per acre). Presley wants exemption to this Plan to enable them to move forward. cc: Don Gee File MP:mm • • City of Fontana Letter of TransmittU Public Works Dept. 8353 SIERRA AVENUE FONTANA•CALIF.92335 Tn. M - ort-E A4db MsoC\ AIES 182 o E. RTUET S'lhN7,8 NNW Ch- .7._70 1 • Attention: TtA Gentlemen, We are aendtno yott: aAttached ❑Drawings 0 Prints ❑Copy of Letter 0 Change Order File: Account No: Date: 71191clo Contract No: Res 8A-SEurlE-06n1ENut. It-urui� SEwElz.. SysTEt•A . JUL 2 i990 ❑Under separate Kim! ,s the following item 0 Plans dSa'm�ples 0 Specificatic ❑ Check Print(s) ['Studies 0 Other COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION , ONE- SET a bAseLtt PtJ� - l4,uNi„St;tle.2 SeeciF)cp Who SET Of Solis g.EfORT. .r Purpose: Q Por your information/records O For approval ❑Approved O For your use O Approved D As requested O Returned Q For review & comment D Other as submitted as noted for liDFor bid due 19, Remarks: Please: ❑ Submit original Q Resubmit copies for approval Submit copies for distribution corrections Q Return corrected prints ❑ Other 0 Prints returned after loaned to 1N My E1Ptut0 SPEC -NC OW oN S'Ec IS mk NvlAD • -ADS CO QEfter 17) SPEC.t PI CPsi-%'0 SF_T AS VENDix Ti . Copy To: Signed: `(Ii e- T-h6f�-+Jvl•4,4j - Title: CPVtL Et sc,-toecit.loer• -Pas T • .L11 • 40 City of Fontana Letter of Transmit a Public Works Dept. e353 SIERRA AVENUE FONTANA,CALIF• 95335 TaL Om) oL,M5,c c • Attention: JIM Gentlemen, Lie are sending you: ❑Drawings , OCopy of Letter File: Date: I—IG-90 Account No: Contract No: Re: (,ILff3eft 4`1 \`' jJ WI'p tj‘‘ a Attached ❑Under separate cover via the following item ❑ Prints 0 Plans Q Samples 0 Specificatio O Change Order 0 Check Print(s) ['Studies 0 Other COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 5 6 ac-SE-L-11E—6e_►•SUF TP-LAQ1C- cEw • r Purpose: ❑For your information/records Please: Q Submit original Q For approval Q Approved as submitted Q Resubmit O For your use O Approved as noted O Submit Q As requested Q Returned for corrections Q Return _ ❑For review & comment O Other O Other O For bid due 19, O Prints returned after loaned to • Remarks: '"T-s_ P�Kry C_t`r`1 COP € o f C,Nf cx� j''`s �t E fls K_ET i-12 ti THt 6 N_./,� copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints \A)T\t ( e D f\ti-S Copy To: Signed: yOWF PI P--N �$j -up- Title: rAvo- it( MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Civil Engineering, Land Planning and Surveying 1820 EAST SIXTEENTH STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 (714) 835-2548 FAX (714) 835-0612 NOVEMBER 7, 1989 J.N. 142-1208 CITY OF FONTANA 8353 SIERRA AVENUE. FONTANA, CALIFORNIA 92335 ATTENTION: MR. BOB WEDDLE, CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT REF: BASE LINE AVENUE TRUNK SEWER Dear Mr. Weddle: Enclosed herewith are two \\(2) Base Line Avenue Trunk Sewer. plan check fees are required The plans are being submitted for sets of plans for the proposed It is my understanding that no because it is a "City Project". first check. You will note that the sewer line is positioned at 5 feet south of centerline. This positioning meets the proposed manhole shown at Base Line Avenue and Beech Avenue per Beech Inteceptor plans prepared by Hall & Foreman, Inc. This location does fit the proposed 14 foot wide median shown easterly of Almeria Avenue because of the median configuration at this location. If an 18 foot wide median is proposed between the Heritage development and Almeria Avenue, then the -proposed sewer location (5 feet south of centerline) would work in this stretch. If a 14 foot wide median is proposed then -the sewer manholes would conflict with the median curb. Please note that due to existing utilities on the north and south sides (see plans) as well as the proposed double box storm drain (north side) that our options are limited. Please carefully review city policy with regard to median width in your review of our plans. Please advise me how I am to proceed with regard to environmental clearance. Please expedite the checking of these plans. Should you have any -questions, -please call. Very truly yours , MADAND ASSOCIATES, INC. 7 Dahlquist Vice President cc: Mr. Steve Riggs, Presley of Southern California