Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSlover Ave Sewer (Hemlock to Popular)CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT Report No. Day Date: 2 - 2 9 - c© M W Th F S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start Stop: + Hours - Item No. tc Contractor: ..aotf.J-v-116..-6 1 &, Remarks (reason for Idleness or other remarks) EQUIPMENT AND IOR LABOR: No. Of Equipment No. Of Men Description (Of Equipment or Labor) Contractor Title insp to/6P/ r. Sheet Of CITY; OF FONTANA Report No. Day Date: 2-Zg3c-v INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT Protect: T W. Th F S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start Stop: Wea r Hours - item No. ri ykL \( L,t______ Contractor A c c, zk . „ . Remarks (reason for Idleness or other remarks) EQUIPMENT AND I OR LABOR No. 0I Equipment No. Of Men Description (OtEquipment orLabor) 1. Q. (-4:Pf51413Nuf414, . —� 4,41t5SQ}��--riat1CIL �W- 1ne (usu111,, .-t Contractor Title Inspect Sheet Of CITY OF FONTANA Report No. Day Date Z— L B -- c c INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT M T W Tb S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start Stop Project 5 OJ6f Contractor .i.s3arr7 t r»,a..a Lp4'4 EQUIPMENT AND/OR LABOR: HOURS - ITEM NO. EQUIPMT. NO. r 1 1 NO. OF MEN i 4 DESCRIPTION (Of Equipment or Labor) crJ I-4--t CSr Tau C_1L 8 WEATHER CAP 1wt",o • REMARKS (Reason for Idleness or other remarks) .LarsAuc31� Nlu ►y r�� t S S -'mil TcTr Yn S3i -t.r_a eve, L - `} C► P. 1. s-e- I Sb --(— r ,air r V Contractor Inspector 1 2192 JT/ab CITY OF FONTANA Report No. Day_ Date: 2 — t—T — c5c� INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT M T W® F S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start Stop: - Hours -Item No. C lburL, Contractor: kC-CAL •6•71 rnA,.l i 1U Remarks (reason for Idleness or other remarks) EQUIPMENT AND IOR LABOR: No. Of Equipment No. Of Men Description (0f Equlpment or Labor) Contractor Title Inspect Sheet Of CITY OF FONTANA Report No. Day Date: 2. - l — 00 INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT M T Th F S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start Stop: • o -r - Hours -Item No. C:4° _____/.51 Contractor._ c .a-01MA,I f CPf,) ' Remarks (reason for Idleness or other remarks) EQUIPMENT AND I OR LABOR: No. Of Equipment No. Of Men Description (0f Equipment or Labor) L)co L-r- Contractor TlUe Inspector Sheet Of CITY OF FONTANA Report No. Day__ Date: 2 tS- oca INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT Protect ��OV �./� wFAr'' M Th F S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start Stop: ' Hours -Item No. 1 L-TW 6L41=At 4, S (a O. Contractor. "-1 iz-m I r - ,.-) E . - Remarks (reason for Idleness or other remarks) EQUIPMENT AND I OR LABOR: No. Of Equipment No. Of Men Description (0! Equipment or Labor) f ra-crTc9 r N Nt)—r Contractor Title Inspec Sheet Of City of Fontana CALIFORNIA Jeff Bonadiman, Vice President Bonadiman-McCain, Inc. 280 South Lena Road San Bernardino, CA 92412 February 15, 2000 RE: SLOVER AVENUE SEWER FROM HEMLOCK AVENUE TO POPLAR AVENUE Weekly Statement of Working Days Reports No. 1 thru No. 14 Dear Mr. Bonadiman: Enclosed for the review is the weekly statement of working days for weeks ending November 12, 1999 through February 11, 2000. You will be allowed (15) days in which to protest in writing the correctness of the statement; otherwise the statement shall be deemed to have been accepted by you as correct. Please contact Harry Foley at (909) 350-7661 or the undersigned at (909) 350-6646, if you need additional information. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Engineering Division Greg y J. Bucknell, P.E. Princ pal Civil Engineer/Special Projects cc: Public Works Inspector (JC) w/copy of enclosures GB:HF:hf www.fontana.org 8353 SIERRA AVENUE FONTANA, CALIFORNIA 92335-3528 (909) 350-7600 recycled paper CITY OF FONTANA REPORT NO. 1 WEEKLY STATEMENT OF WORKING DAYS PROJECT: SLOVER AVENUE SEWER PROJECT from HEMLOCK AVENUE TO POPLAR AVENUE TO: BONADIMAN - McCAIN, INC. The following statement shows the number of working days charged to your contract for the week ending: NOV. 12, 1999 Date Day Weather, Weather Conditions or Other Conditions Working Day Non -Working Days Caused by Weather Working Days No Work Done on Controlling Operation (Note 2) 11/08/1999 Mon. 11/09/1999 Tue. CLEAR -SUNNY - 82 Deg. F. 1 11/10/1999 Wed. CLEAR -SUNNY - 82 Deg. F. 1 11/11/1999 Thur. NO ACTIVITY ON JOB SITE 1 11/12/1999 Fri. NO ACTIVITY ON JOB SITE 1 Days this week Days previously reported Total days to date 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 TIME EXTENSIONS CCO Numbers (Note 3) Days Approved Other CCO Days Days Total this report previously reported. days to date COMPUTATION OF EXTENDED DATE FOR COMPLETION 1. First working day designated 2. Working days specified in contract. 3. COMPUTE DATE FOR COMPLETION(if all days specified are workable) 4. Total time extension days approved to date (CCO plus other) 5. Total non -working days to date (Note 4) 6. Sub Total (Line 4 plus Line 5) 7. EXTENDED DATE FOR COMPLETION (Line 3 plus Line 6) 8. Revised working days for. contract (Line 2 plus Line 4) 9. Total working days to date 10. WORKING DAYS REMAINING (Line 8 minus Line 9) Number of Days Numbered Day (Note 4) DAY NO. 462 Date 11/09/1999 45 .................. 45 4 41 MMMMM DAY `NO. 507+j.11::0120 /2000 DAY NO. 507 O1/20/2000 Controlling Operation(s): TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 09, 1999 IS THE FIRST WORKING DAY FOR CONTRACT COMPLETION. Remarks: (Note 5) (Continue on reverse) The Contractor will be allowed fifteen (15) days in which to protest in writing the correctness of the statement; otherwise the statement shall be deemed to have been accepted by the Contractor as correct. NOTE: A11 footnotes are on the reverse side. HF:hf ed7.pjent Engineer Revised:1102/15/00 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESIDENT ENGINEER 1... When recording nonworking days due to weather; state the reason why the day was unworkable when the weather description itself does not adequately describe conditions. For example, "Clear -wet grade" to describe conditions when the weather is clear, but the grade is too wet to work.• Do not list days merely as "Unworkable". 2 . Enter days on which no productive work has been performed on the controlling operation(s) for reasons other than weather. 3 . List numbers of contract change orders providing for time extensions. 4. Do not include nonworking dayswhichoccur after expiration of: the Extended DATE OP COMPLETION. On: contracts that -are overtime, the total under WORKING. DAYS shall not be. greater than the total .of -REVISED, WORKING DAYS, (line' .8.) . After approved . total .of ..working days has been •reached, continue recording .-working and nonworking days but do not ` add into .the totals. Make statement under. REMARKS the WORKING and NONWORKING days are shown for record only since the contract time has elapsed. 5 _ Time extensions other, are to be explained under REMARKS and the following information is to be included: (a) Cause of delay and specification reference/under. which approval was granted. (b) Statement as to what controlling operation• or operations are being delayed and to what extent. (c) Dates for which the extension was granted. (d) Reference to supporting data. ADDITIONAL REMARKS: CITY OF FONTANA WEEKLY STATEMENT OF WORKING DAYS PROJECT: SLOVER AVENUE SEWER PROJECT from HEMLOCK AVENUE TO POPLAR AVENUE REPORT NO. 2 TO: BONADIMAN - McCAIN, INC. The following statement shows the number of working days charged to your contract for the week ending: NOV. 19, 1999 Date Day Weather, Weather Conditions or Other Conditions Working Day Non -Working Days Caused by Weather Working Days No Work Done on Controlling Operation (Note 2) 11/15/1999 Mon. SUNNY - 72 Deg. F. 1 11/16/1999 Tue. CLEAR -SUNNY - 72 Deg. F. 1 11/17/1999 Wed. CLOUDY - 80 Deg. F. 1 11/18/1999 Thur. CLEAR -SUNNY - 72 Deg. F. 1 11/19/1999 Fri. CLOUDY - 80 Deg. F. 1 Days this week Days previously reported Total days to date 5 0 0 4 0 0 9 0 0 TIME EXTENSIONS CCO Numbers (Note 3) Days Approved CCO Other Days Days Total this report previously reported. days to date COMPUTATION OF EXTENDED DATE FOR COMPLETION 1. First working day designated 2. Working days specified in contract 3. COMPUTE DATE FOR COMPLETION(if all days specified are workable) 4. Total time extension days approved to date (CCO plus other) 5. Total non -working days to date (Note 4) 6. Sub Total (Line 4 plus Line 5) 7. EXTENDED DATE FOR COMPLETION (Line 3 plus Line 6) 8. Revised working days for contract. (Line 2 plus Line 4) 9. Total working days to date 10. WORKING DAYS REMAINING (Line 8 minus Line 9) Controlling Operation(s): Number of Days Numbered Day (Note 4) DAY NO. 462 Date 11/09/1999, 45 ............. ... . 45 9 36 DAY NO. 507 1 01/20/2000 DAY NO. 507 01/20/2000 Remarks: (Note 5) (Continue on reverse) The Contractor will be allowed fifteen (15) days in which to protest in writing the correctness of the statement; otherwise the statement shall be deemed to have been accepted by the Contractor as correct. NOTE: A11 footnotes are on the reverse side. HF:hf f) bif rC^oo Res dent Engineer Revised: 02/15/00 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESIDENT ENGINEER IL. When recording nonworking days due to weather; state the reason why the day was .unworkable when the weather description itself does not adequately describe conditions. For example, "Clear -wet grade" to describe conditions when the weather is clear, but the grade is too wet to work.. Do not list days merely as "Unworkable". 2 . Enter days on which no productive work has been performed on the controlling operation(s) for reasons other than weather. 3 . List numbers of . contract change orders providing for time extensions. 4 . Do not include nonworking days whichoccur after expiration of:. . the Extended . DATE OF COMPLETION. On contracts that `-are ,overtime, the total under. WORKING DAYS shall not be. greater than the total of REVISED. WORKING DAYS, {line .8.) . After approved total .of ::;working days has' been -reached, continue recording -working and nonworking days but do not add into .the totals. Make statement under REMARKS the WORKING and NONWORKING days are shown for :record only since the contract time has elapsed. 5 - Time extensions other, are to be explained under REMARKS and the following information is to be included: (a) Cause of delay and specification reference/under_ which approval was granted. (b) Statement as to what controlling operation• or operations are being delayed and to what extent. (c) Dates for which the extension was granted. (d) Reference to supporting data. ADDITIONAL REMARKS: CITY OF FONTANA WEEKLY STATEMENT OF WORKING DAYS PROJECT: SLOVER AVENUE SEWER PROJECT from HEMLOCK AVENUE TO POPLAR AVENUE REPORT NO. 3 TO: BONADIMAN - McCAIN, INC. The following statement shows the number of working days charged to your contract for the week ending: NOV. 26, 1999 Date Day Weather, Weather Conditions or Other Conditions Working Day Non -Working Days Caused by. Weather Working Days No Work Done on Controlling Operation (Note 2) 11/22/1999 Mon. HIGH WINDS DAY 1 11/23/1999 Tue. HIGH CLOUDS -.82 Deg. F. 1 11/24/1999 Wed. HIGH WINDS DAY 1 11/25/1999 Thur. HOLIDAY 11/26/1999 Fri. HOLIDAY Days this week Days previously reported Total days to date 1 2 0 9 0 0 10 2 0 TIME EXTENSIONS CCO Numbers (Note 3) Days Approved CCO Other Days Days Total this report previously reported. days to date COMPUTATION OF EXTENDED DATE FOR COMPLETION 1. First working day designated 2. Working days specified in contract 3. COMPUTE DATE FOR COMPLETION(if all days specified are workable) 4. Total time'extension days approved to date (CCO plus other) 5. Total non -working days to date (Note 4) 6. Sub Total (Line 4 plus Line 5) 7. EXTENDED DATE FOR COMPLETION (Line 3 plus Line 6) 8. Revised working days for contract (Line 2 plus Line 4) 9. Total working days to date 10. WORKING DAYS REMAINING (Line 8 minus Line 9) Number of Days Numbered Day (Note 4) DAY NO. 462 Date 11/09/1999 45 2 2 _ 47 10 37 DAY NO. 507 DAY NO. 509 WWWWWW 01/20/2000 01/24/2000 Controlling Operation(s): Added two (2) working days to contract completion date due to high winds Monday 11 11/24/99. No activity on job site Thursday 11/25/99 and Friday 11/26/99 due to Holiday. Remarks: (Note 5) (Continue on reverse) The Contractor will be allowed fifteen (15) days in which to protest in writing the correctness of the statement; otherwise the statement shall be deemed to have been accepted by the Contractor as correct. NOTE: All footnotes are on the reverse side. HF:hf Re Revise ident Engineer : 02/15/00 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESIDENT ENGINEER 1. When recording nonworking days due to weather; state the reason why the day was unworkable when the weather description itself does not adequately describe conditions. For example, "Clear -wet grade" to describe conditions when the weather is clear, but the grade is too wet to work.. Do not list days merely as "Unworkable". 2 . Enter days on which no productive work has been performed on the controlling operation(s) for reasons other than weather. 3 . List numbers of . contract change orders providing for time extensions. 4 . Do not include nonworking days - whichoccur after expiration of. the Extended. DATE OF COMPLETION. On. contracts that -are 4avertime, the total. under WORKING DAYS shall not begreater than the total .of -REVISED. WORKING DAYS, (line .8)-. After approved : total .of .. working days has been -reached, continue recording •working and nonworking days . but do not add into .the totals. Make statement under REMARKS the WORKING and NONWORKING days are shown for record only since the contract timehas elapsed. 5 _ Time extensions other, are to be explained under REMARKS and the following information is to be included: (a) Cause of delay and specification reference/under. which approval was granted. (b) Statement as to what controlling operation• or operations are being delayed and to what extent. (c) Dates for which the extension was granted. (d) Reference to supporting data. ADDITIONAL REMARKS: CITY OF FONTANA WEEKLY STATEMENT OF WORKING DAYS PROJECT: SLOVER AVENUE SEWER PROJECT from HEMLOCK AVENUE TO POPLAR AVENUE REPORT NO. 4 TO: BONADIMAN - McCAIN, INC. The following statement shows the number of working days charged to your contract for the week ending: DEC. 03, 1999 Date Day Weather, Weather Conditions or Other Conditions Working Day Non -Working Days Caused by Weather Working Days No Work Done on Controlling Operation (Note 2) 11/29/1999 Mon. CLEAR -SUNNY - 86 Deg. F. 1 11/30/1999 Tue.' HIGH CLOUDS - 64 Deq. F. 1 12/01/1999 Wed. HIGH CLOUDS/OVERCAST - 68 Deg. F. 1 12/02/1999 Thur. CLEAR -SUNNY - 86 Deg. F. 1 12/03/1999 Fri. HIGH WINDS DAY 1 Days this week Days previously reported Total days to date 4 1 0 10 2 0 14. 3 0 TIME EXTENSIONS CCO Numbers (Note 3) Days Approved CCO Other Days Days Total this report previously reported. days to date COMPUTATION OF EXTENDED DATE FOR COMPLETION 1. First working day designated 2. Working days specified in contract 3. COMPUTE DATE FOR COMPLETION(if all days specified are workable) 4. Total time extension days approved to date (CCO plus other) 5. Total non -working days to date (Note 4) 6. Sub Total (Line 4 plus Line 5) 7. EXTENDED DATE FOR COMPLETION (Line 3 plus Line 6) 8. Revised working days for contract (Line 2 plus Line 4) 9. Total working days to date 10. WORKING DAYS REMAINING (Line 8 minus Line 9) Number of'Days magnum Numbered Day (Note 4) DAY NO. 462 Date 11/09/1999 !45 3 3 ............................. 48 14 34 DAY::: NO. 507 ::::: � '�00% (.•O1/2 20/ /20 DAY NO. 510 01/25/2000 Controlling Operation(s): Added one (1) working day to contract completion date due to high winds Friday 12 Remarks: (Note 5) (Continue on reverse) The Contractor will be allowed fifteen (15) days in which to protest in writing the correctness of the statement/ otherwise the statement shall be deemed to have been accepted by the Contractor as correct. NOTE: All footnotes are on the reverse side. HF:hf Res dent Engineer Revised. 02/15/00 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESIDENT ENGINEER 1. When recording nonworking days due to weather; state the reason why the day was unworkable when the weather description itself does not adequately describe. conditions. For example, "Clear -wet grade" to describe conditions when the weather is clear, but the grade is too wet to work. Do not list days merely as "Unworkable". 2 . Enter days on which no productive work has been performed on the controlling operations) ,for reasons other than weather. 3 List numbers of . contract change orders providing for time extensions. 4 . Do not include nonworking days which. occur after expiration of the Extended DATE OF COMPLETION. On contracts that are overtime, the total under. WORKING DAYS shall not be greater than the total of REVISED. WORKING DAYS, (line .8.):_ After approved total of working days has been reached, continue recording •'working and nonworking daysbut do not add into the totals_ Make statement under .REMARKS the WORKING and NONWORKING days are shown for :record only since the contract time has elapsed. 5 _ Time extensions other, are to be explained under REMARKS and the following information is to be included: (a) Cause of delay and specification reference/under. which approval was granted. (b) Statement as to what controlling operation• or operations are being delayed and to what extent. (c) Dates for which the extension was granted. (d) Reference to supporting data. ADDITIONAL R M RKS : CITY OF FONTANA REPORT NO. 5 WEEKLY STATEMENT OF WORKING DAYS PROJECT: SLOVER AVENUE SEWER PROJECT from HEMLOCK AVENUE TO POPLAR AVENUE TO: BONADIMAN - McCAIN, INC. The following statement shows the number of working days charged to your contract for the week ending: DEC. 10, 1999 Date Day Weather, Weather Conditions or Other Conditions Working Day Non -Working Days Caused by Weather Working Days No Work Done on Controlling Operation (Note 2) 12/06/1999 Mon. CLEAR -SUNNY - 82 Deg. F. 1 12/07/1999 Tue. CLEAR -SUNNY - 82 Deg. F. 1 12/08/1999 Wed. HIGH WINDS DAY 1 12/09/1999 Thur. HIGH CLOUDS 1 12/10/1999 Fri. CLOUDY -SUNNY - 64 Deg. F. 1 Days this week Days previously reported Total days to date 4 1 0 14 3 0 18 4 0 TIME EXTENSIONS CCO Numbers (Note 3) Days Approved Other CCO Days Days Total this report previously reported. days to date COMPUTATION OF EXTENDED DATE FOR COMPLETION 1. First working day designated 2. Working days specified in contract 3. COMPUTE DATE FOR COMPLETION(if all days specified are workable) 4. Total time extension days approved to date (CCO plus other) 5. Total non -working days to date (Note 4) 6. Sub Total (Line 4 plus Line 5) 7. EXTENDED DATE FOR COMPLETION (Line 3 plus Line 6) 8. Revised working days for contract (Line 2 plus Line 4) 9. Total working days to date 10. WORKING DAYS REMAINING (Line 8 minus Line 9) Number of Days Numbered Day (Note.4) DAY NO. 462 Date 11/09/1999 45 4 4 49 18 31 DAY NO. 507 a 01/20/2000 DAY NO. 511 01/26'2000 Controlling Operation(s): Added one (1) working day to contract completion date due to high winds Wednesday Remarks: (Note 5) (Continue on reverse) The Contractor will be allowed fifteen (15) days in which to protest in writing the correctness of the statement/ otherwise the statement shall be deemed to have been accepted by the Contractor as correct. NOTE: A11 footnotes are on the reverse side. HF:hf Revise z— ( i dent Engineer 02/15/00 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESIDENT ENGINEER 1. When recording nonworking days due to weather; state the reason why the day was unworkable when the weather description itself does not adequately describe conditions. For example, "Clear -wet grade" to describe conditions when the weather is clear, but the grade is too wet to work.. Do not list days merely as "Unworkable" . 2 . Enter days on which no productive work has been performed on the controlling operation(s) for reasons other than weather. 3 . List numbers of . contract change orders providing for time extensions. 4. Do not include nonworking days whichoccur after expiration of .the Extended DATE OF COMPLETION. On contracts that •are overtime, the total under WORKING DAYS shall not begreater than the total .of REVISED. WORKING DAYS, (line 8). After approved total of :.:working days, has been -reached, continue recording working and nonworking days but do not add into the totals. Make statement under REMARKS the WORKING and NONWORKING days are shown for :record only since the contract time has elapsed. 5 _ Time extensions other, are to be explained under REMARKS and the following information is to be included: (a) Cause of delay and specification reference/under. which approval was granted. (b) Statement as to what controlling operation• or operations are being delayed and to what extent. (c) Dates for which the extension was granted. (d) Reference to supporting data. ADDITIONAL REMARKS CITY OF FONTANA REPORT NO. 6 WEEKLY STATEMENT OF WORKING DAYS PROJECT: SLOVER AVENUE SEWER PROJECT from HEMLOCK AVENUE TO POPLAR AVENUE TO: BONADIMAN - MCCAIN, INC. The following statement shows the number of working days charged to your contract for the week ending: DEC: 17, 1999 Date Day Weather, Weather Conditions or Other Conditions Working Day Non -Working Days Caused by Weather Working Days No Work Done on Controlling Operation (Note 2) 12/13/1999 Mon. HIGH WINDS - 67 Deg. F. 1 12/14/1999 Tue. HIGH WINDS - 68 Deg. F. 1 12/15/1999 Wed. HIGH WINDS - 74 Deg. F. 1 12/16/1999 Thur. HIGH WINDS DAY 1 12/17/1999 Fri. HIGH WINDS DAY 1 Days this week Days previously reported Total days to date 3 2 0 18 4 0 21 6 0 TIME EXTENSIONS CCO Numbers (Note 3) Days Approved Other CCO Days Days Total this report previously reported. days to date COMPUTATION OF EXTENDED DATE FOR COMPLETION 1. First working day designated 2. Working days specified in contract 3. COMPUTE DATE FOR COMPLETION(if all days specified are workable) 4. Total time extension days approved to date (CCO plus other) 5. Total non -working days to date (Note 4) 6. Sub Total (Line 4 plus Line 5) 7. EXTENDED DATE FOR COMPLETION (Line 3 plus Line 6) 8. Revised working days for contract (Line 2 plus Line 4) 9. Total working days to date 10. WORKING DAYS REMAINING (Line 8 minus Line 9) Number of Days RENOWN Numbered Day (Note 4) DAY NO. 462 Date 11/09/1999 45 6 6 51 21 30 DAY NOJ.::::: 507 01/202 DAY NO. 513 01/28/2000 Controlling Operation(s): Added two (2) working days to contract completion date due to high winds Thursday Remarks: (Note 5) (Continue on reverse) The Contractor will be allowed fifteen (15) days in which to protest in writing the correctness of the statement; otherwise the statement shall be deemed to have been accepted by the Contractor as correct. NOTE: All footnotes are on the reverse side. HF:hf e'.S; ent Engineer Revise. 02/15/00 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESIDENT ENGINEER 1.. When recording nonworking days due to weather; state the reason why the day was unworkable when the weather description itself does not adequately describe conditions. For example, "Clear -wet grade" to describe conditions when the weather is clear, but the grade is too wet to work.. Do not list days merely as "Unworkable" 2 . Enter days on which no productive work has been performed on the controlling operation(s) for reasons other than weather. 3 - List numbers of . contract change orders providing for time extensions_ 4. Do not include .nonworking days whichoccur- after expiration of the Extended. DATE OF COMPLETION. On contracts that -are ,overtime, the total under WORKING DAYS shall not be greater than the total .of REVISED. WORKING DAYS, (lime .8.) _ After approved total of ..working days has been -reached, continue recording :•working and nonworking days but do not add into .the totals. Make statement under. REMARKS the WORKING and NONWORKING days are shown for :record only since the contract time has elapsed. 5 - Tirne extensions other, are to be explained under REMARKS and the following information is to be included: (a) Cause of delay and specification reference/under. which approval was granted. (b) Statement as to. what controlling operation• or operations are being delayed and to what extent. (c) Dates for which the extension was granted. (d) Reference to supporting data. ADDITIONAL REMARKS : CITY OF FONTANA WEEKLY STATEMENT OF WORKING DAYS PROJECT: SLOVER AVENUE SEWER PROJECT from HEMLOCK AVENUE TO POPLAR AVENUE REPORT NO. 7 TO: BONADIMAN - McCAIN, INC. The following statement shows the number of working days charged to your contract for the week ending: DEC. 24, 1999 Date Day Weather, Weather Conditions or Other Conditions Working Day Non -Working Days Caused by Weather Working Days No Work Done on Controlling Operation (Note 2) 12/20/1999 Mon. HIGH WINDS DAY 1 12/21/1999 Tue. CLEAR - WARM - 77 Deg. F. 1 12/22/1999 Wed. HIGH WINDS DAY 1 12/23/1999 Thur. HIGH WINDS DAY 1 12/24/1999 Fri. HOLIDAY Days this week Days previously reported Total days to date 1 3 0 21 6 0 22 9 0 TIME EXTENSIONS CCO Numbers (Note 3) Days Approved CCO Other Days this report Days previously reported. Total days to date COMPUTATION OF EXTENDED DATE FOR COMPLETION 1. First working day designated 2. Working days specified in contract 3. COMPUTE DATE FOR COMPLETION(if all days specified are workable) 4. Total time extension days approved to date (CCO plus other) 5. Total non -working days to date (Note 4) 6. Sub Total (Line 4 plus Line 5) 7. EXTENDED DATE FOR COMPLETION (Line 3 plus Line 6) 8. Revised working days for contract (Line 2 plus Line 4) 9. Total working days to date 10. WORKING DAYS REMAINING (Line 8 minus Line 9) Number of Dais .............................. ............................. Numbered Day (Note 4). DAY NO. 462 Date 11/09/1999 45 9 9 DAY NO. 5071 01/20/2000 DAY NO. 516 02/02/2000 56 22 Controlling Operation(s): Added three (3) working days to contract completion date due to high winds Monday 12/22/99 and Thursday 12/23/99. No activity on job site Friday 12/24/99 due to Holiday. Remarks: (Note 5) (Continue on reverse) The Contractor will be allowed fifteen (15) days in which to protest in writing the correctness of the statement/ otherwise the statement shall be deemed to have been accepted by the Contractor as correct. NOTE: All footnotes are on the reverse side. HF:hf IS- Do eMj0ent Engineer Revised:k)02/15/00 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESIDENT ENGINEER 1. When recording nonworking days due to weather; state the reason why the day was unworkable when the weather description itself does not adequately describe ' conditions. For example, "Clear -wet grade" to describe conditions when the weather is clear, but the grade is too wet to work.. Do not list days merely as "Unworkable". 2 . Enter days on which no productive work has been performed on the controlling operation(s) ,for reasons other than weather_ 3 . List numbers of contract change orders providing for time extensions. 4 . Do not include nonworking days whichoccur after expiration of the Extended. DATE OF COMPLETION. On contracts that are overtime, the total under WORKING DAYS shall not begreater than the total .of REVISED. WORKING DAYS, (lisle .8-)-. After approved total of ,.working days has been -reached, continue recording working and nonworking days . but do not add into ,the totals. Make statement under REMARKS the WORKING and NONWORKING days are shown for :record only since the contract time.. has elapsed. 5 _ Time extensions other, are to be explained under REMARKS and the following information is to be included: (a) Cause of delay and specification reference/under._ which approval was granted. (b) Statement as to what controlling operation• or operations are being delayed and to what extent. (c) Dates for which the extension was granted. (d) Reference to supporting data. ADDITIONAL REMARKS: CITY OF FONTANA REPORT NO. 8 WEEKIIY STATEMENT OF WORKING DAYS PROJECT: SLOVER AVENUE SEWER PROJECT from HEMLOCK AVENUE TO POPLAR AVENUE TO: BONADIMAN - McCAIN, INC. The following statement shows the number of working days charged to your contract for the week ending: DEC. 31, 1999 Date Day Weather, Weather Conditions or Other Conditions Working Day Non -Working Days Caused by Weather Working Days No Work Done on Controlling Operation (Note 2) 12/27/1999 Mon. CLEAR -WINDY -COOL - 71 Deg. F. 1 12/28/1999 Tue. CLEAR -WARM - 76 Deg. F. 1 12/29/1999 Wed. CLEAR -WARM - 76 Deg. F. 1 12/30/1999 Thur. CLEAR -WARM - 72 Deg. F. 1 12/31/1999 Fri. HOLIDAY Days this week Days previously reported Total days to date 4 0 0 22 9 0 26 9 0 TIME EXTENSIONS CCO Numbers (Note 3) Days Approved Other CCO Days Days Total this report previously reported. days to date COMPUTATION OF EXTENDED DATE FOR COMPLETION 1. First working day designated 2. Working days specified in contract 3. COMPUTE DATE FOR COMPLETION(if all days specified are workable) 4. Total time extension days approved to date (CCO plus other) 5. Total non -working days to date (Note 4) 6. Sub Total (Line 4 plus Line 5) 7. EXTENDED DATE FOR COMPLETION (Line 3 plus Line 6) 8. Revised working days for contract (Line 2 plus Line 4) 9. Total working days to date 10. WORKING DAYS REMAINING (Line 8 minus Line 9) Number of Days Numbered Day (Note 4) DAY NO. 462 Date 11/09/1999 45 9 9 47 26 21 Controlling Operation(s): No activity on job site Friday 12/31/99 due to Holiday. tNO. 507 01..' WM DAY20/2000 DAY NO. 516 02/02/2000 Remarks: (Noe 5) (Continue on reverse) The Contractor will be allowed fifteen (15) days in which to protest in writing the correctness of the statement; otherwise the statement shall be deemed to have been accepted by the Contractor as correct. NOTE: A11 footnotes are on the, reverse side. HF : hf l� EIS ) ent Engineer Revised:'02/15/00 -00 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESIDENT ENGINEER 1. When recording nonworking days due to weather; state the reason why the day was unworkable when the weather description itself does not adequately describe conditions. For example, "Clear -wet grade" to describe conditions when the weather is clear, but the grade is too wet to work. • Do not list days merely as "Unworkable" 2 . Enter days on which no productive work has been performed on the controlling operation(s) for reasons other than weather. 3 . List numbers of contract change orders providing for time extensions. 4 . Do not include nonworking days whichoccur after expiration of , . the Extended . DATE OF COMPLETION. On contracts that -are ,overtime, the total under WORKING DAYS shall not begreater than the total of REVISED. WORMING DAYS, (line .8.) . After approved .total of working days has been -reached, continue recording working and nonworking days . but do not add into .the totals. Make statement under. REMARKS the WORKING and NONWORKING days are shown for record only since the contract time has elapsed. 5 _ Time extensions other, are to be explained under REMARKS and the following information is to be included: (a) Cause of delay and specification reference/under which approval was granted. (b) Statement as to what controlling operation• or operations are being delayed and to what . extent. (c) Dates for which the extension was granted. (d) Reference to supporting data. ADDITIONAL REMARKS: CITY OF FONTANA REPORT N0. 9 WEEKLY STATEMENT OF WORKING DAYS PROJECT: SLOVER AVENUE SEWER PROJECT from HEMLOCK AVENUE TO POPLAR AVENUE TO: BONADIMAN - McCAIN, INC. The following statement shows the number of working days charged to your contract for the week. ending: JAN.07, 2000 Date Day Weather, Weather Conditions or Other Conditions Working Day Non -Working Days Caused by Weather Working Days No Work Done on Controlling Operation (Note 2) 01/03/2000 Mon. 1 01/04/2000 Tue. 1 01/05/2000 Wed. 1 • 01/06/2000 Thur. HIGH WINDS DAY 1 01/07/2000 Fri. CLEAR 1 Days this week Days previously reported Total days to date 4 1 0 26 9 0 30 10 0 TIME EXTENSIONS CCO Numbers (Note 3) Days Approved Other CCO Days Days Total this report previously reported. days to date COMPUTATION OF EXTENDED DATE FOR COMPLETION 1. First working day designated 2. Working days specified in contract 3. COMPUTE DATE FOR COMPLETION(if all days specified are workable) 4. Total time extension days approved to date (CCO plus other) 5. Total non -working days to date (Note 4) 6. Sub Total (Line 4 plus Line 5) 7. EXTENDED DATE FOR COMPLETION (Line 3 plus Line 6) 8. Revised working days for contract (Line 2 plus Line 4) 9. Total working days to date 10. WORKING DAYS REMAINING (Line 8 minus Line 9) Number of Days Numbered Day (Note 4) DAY NO. 462 Date 11/09/1999 45 10 10 mamma mognamm DAY NO. 507 01/20/2000 DAY NO. 517 02/03/2000 55. 30 25 Controlling Operation(s): Added one (1) working day to contract completion date due to high winds Thursday 0 Remarks: (Note 5) (Continue on reverse) The Contractor will be allowed fifteen (15) days in which to protest in writing the correctness of the statement; otherwise the statement shall be deemed to have been accepted by the Contractor as correct. NOTE: A11 footnotes are on the reverse side. HF:hf • 2: Rewdent Engineer Revised! 02/15/00 ,ao INSTRUCTIONS TO RESIDENT ENGINEER 1, When recording nonworking days due to weather; state the reason why the day was unworkable when the weather description itself does not adequately describe conditions. For example, "Clear -wet grade" to describe conditions when the weather is clear, but the grade is too wet to work. • Do not list days merely as "Unworkable" . 2 . Enter days on which no productive work has been performed on the controlling operation(s) for reasons other than weather. 3 . List numbers of contract change orders providing for time extensions. 4. Do not include nonworking days which. occur after expiration of the Extended. DATE OF COMPLETION. On contracts that are overtime, the total under, WORKING DAYS shall not begreater than the total .of REVISED. WORKING DAYS,(line .8). After approved .total of working days has been -reached, continue recording working and nonworking days but do not add into .the . totals. Make statement under REMARKS the WORKING and NONWORKING days are shown for record only since the contract time has elapsed. 5 _ Time extensions other, are to be explained under REMARKS and the following information is to be included: (a) Cause of delay and specification reference/under. which approval was granted. (b) Statement as to what controlling operation• or operations are being delayed and to what extent. (c) Dates for which the extension was granted. (d) Reference to supporting data. ADDITIONAL REMARKS: CITY OF FONTANA WEEKLY STATEMENT OF WORKING DAYS PROJECT: SLOVER AVENUE SEWER PROJECT from HEMLOCK AVENUE TO POPLAR AVENUE REPORT NO. 10 TO: BONADIMAN - McCAIN, INC. The following statement shows the number of working days charged to your contract for the week ending: JAN. 14, 2000. Date Day Weather, Weather Conditions or Other Conditions Working Day Non -Working Days Caused by Weather Working Days No Work Done on Controlling Operation (Note 2) 01/10/2000 Mon. CLEAR -SUNNY - 82 Deg. F. 1 01/11/2000 Tue. CLEAR -SUNNY - 82 Deg. F. 1 01/12/2000 Wed. CLEAR -SUNNY - 82 Deg. F. 1 01/13/2000 Thur. NO ACTIVITY ON JOB SITE 1 01/14/2000 Fri. NO ACTIVITY ON JOB SITE 1 Days this week Days previously reported Total days to date 5 0 0 30 10 0 35 10 0 TIME EXTENSIONS CCO Numbers (Note-3) Days Approved Other CCO Days Days Total this report previously reported. days to date COMPUTATION OF EXTENDED DATE FOR COMPLETION 1. First working day designated 2. Working days specified in contract 3. COMPUTE DATE FOR COMPLETION(if all days specified are workable) 4. Total time extension days approved to date (CCO plus other) 5. Total non -working days to date (Note 4) 6. Sub Total (Line 4 plus Line 5) 7. EXTENDED DATE FOR COMPLETION (Line 3 plus Line 6) 8. Revised working days for contract (Line 2plus Line 4) 9. Total working days to date 10. WORKING DAYS REMAINING (Line 8 minus Line 9) Number of Days Numbered Day (Note 4) DAY N0. 462 Date 11/09/1999 45 10 10 55 35 20 MMWOMMUMN DAY N0. 507 DAY NO. 517 01/20/2000 02/03/2000 Controlling Operation(s): Remarks: (Note 5) (Continue on reverse) The Contractor will be allowed fifteen (15) days in which to protest in writing the correctness of the statement; otherwise the statement shall be deemed to have been accepted by the Contractor as correct. NOTE: All footnotes are on the reverse side. HF : hf esident Engineer Reviled: 02/15/00 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESIDENT ENGINEER 1. When recording nonworking days due to weather; state the reason why the day was unworkable when the weather description itself does not adequately describe conditions . For example, "Clear -wet grade" to describe conditions when the weather is clear, but the grade is too wet to work.. Do not list days merely as "Unworkable" . 2 . Enter days on which no productive work has been performed on the controlling operation (s) .for reasons other than weather. 3 . List numbers of. contract change orders providing for time extensions. 4 . Do not include nonworking days whichoccur after expiration of the Extended DATE OF COMPLETION. On contracts that ,are :overtime, the total under WORKING DAYS shall not be.. greater than the total of -REVISED, WORKING DAYS, (line .81-- After approved total .of .working days has been • reached, continue recording -working and nonworking days but do not add into .the totals Make statement under. REMARKS the WORKING and NONWORKING days are shown for. record only since the contract time .has elapsed. 5 _ Tine extensions other, are to be explained under REMARKS and the following information is to be included: (a) Cause of delay and specification reference/under. which approval was granted. (b) Statement as to what controlling operation• or operations are being delayed and to- what extent (c) Dates for which the extension was granted. (d) Reference to supporting data. ADDITIONAL REMARKS: CITY OF FONTANA WEEKLY STATEMENT OF WORKING DAYS PROJECT: SLOVER AVENUE SEWER PROJECT from HEMLOCK AVENUE TO POPLAR AVENUE REPORT NO. 11 TO: BONADIMAN - McCAIN, INC. The following statement shows the number of working days charged to your contract for the week ending: JAN. 21, 2000. Date Day Weather, Weather Conditions or Other Conditions Working Day Non -Working Days Caused by Weather Working Days No Work Done on Controlling Operation (Note 2) 01/17/2000 Mon. 1 01/18/2000 The. CLEAR -SUNNY - 82 Deg. F. 1 01/19/2000 Wed. CLEAR -SUNNY - 82 Deg. F. 1 01/20/2000 Thur. NO ACTIVITY ON JOB SITE 1 01/21/2000 Fri. NO ACTIVITY ON JOB SITE 1 Days this week Days previously reported Total days to date 5 0 0 35 10 0 40 10 0 TIME EXTENSIONS CCO Numbers (Note 3) Days Approved CCO Other Days this report• Days previously reported. Total days to date COMPUTATION OF EXTENDED DATE FOR COMPLETION 1. First working day designated 2. Working days specified in contract 3. COMPUTE DATE FOR COMPLETION(if all days specified are workable) 4. Total time extension days approved to date (CCO plus other) 5. Total non -working days to date (Note 4) 6. Sub Total (Line 4 plus Line 5) 7. EXTENDED DATE FOR COMPLETION (Line 3 plus Line 6) 8. Revised working days for contract (Line 2 plus Line 4) 9. Total working days to date 10. WORKING DAYS REMAINING (Line 8 minus Line 9) Controlling Operation(s): Number of Days Numbered Day (Note 4) DAY NO. 462 Date 11/09/1999 45 10 10 pgRMOMMOMMOW DAY NO. 507 01/20/2000 ............................. ............................. ............................. 55 40 15 DAY NO. 517 02/03/2000 Remarks: (Note 5) (Continue on reverse) The Contractor will be allowed fifteen (15) days in which to protest in writing the correctness of the statement; otherwise the statement shall be deemed to have been accepted by the Contractor as correct. NOTE: All footnotes are on the reverse side. HF:hf sident Engineer Revised: 02/15/00 INSTRt7CTIONS TO RESIDENT ENGINEER 1. When recording nonworking days due to weather; state the reason why the day was unworkable when the weather description itself does not adequately describe conditions. For example, "Clear -wet grade" to describe conditions when the weather is clear, but the grade is too wet to work. Do not list days merely as "Unworkable" . 2 . Enter days on which no productive work has been performed on the controlling operations) .for reasons other than weather. 3 . List numbers of contract change orders providing for time extensions. 4 . Do not include nonworking days whichoccur after expiration of . the Extended DATE OF COMPLETION. On contracts that are overtime, the total under WORKING DAYS shall not begreater than the total of -REVISED WORKING DAYS, (line 8.) . After approved total of ..working days has been -reached, continue recording working and nonworking days but do not add into .the totals. Make statement under REMARKS the WORKING and NONWORKING days are shown for record only since the contract time has elapsed. 5 - Time extensions other, are to be explained under REMARKS and the following information is to be included: (a) Cause of delay and specification reference%under. which approval was granted. (b) Statement as to what controlling operation• or operations are being delayed and to what extent. (c) Dates for which the extension was granted. (d) Reference to supporting data. ADDITIONAL REMARKS: CITY OF FONTANA WEEKLY STATEMENT OF WORKING DAYS PROJECT: SLOVER AVENUE SEWER PROJECT from HEMLOCK AVENUE TO POPLAR AVENUE REPORT NO. 12 TO: BONADIMAN - McCAIN, INC. .The following statement shows the number of working days charged to your contract for the week ending: JAN. 28, 2000. Date Day Weather, Weather Conditions or Other Conditions Working Day Non -Working Days Caused by Weather Working Days No Work Done on Controlling Operation (Note 2) 01/24/2000 Mon. 1 01/25/2000 Tue. CLEAR -SUNNY - 82 Deg. F. 1 01/26/2000 Wed. CLEAR -SUNNY - 82 Deg. F. 1 01/27/2000 Thur. NO ACTIVITY ON JOB SITE 1 • 01/28/2000 Fri. NO ACTIVITY ON JOB SITE 1 . Days this week Days previously reported Total days to date 5 0 0 40 10 0 45 10 0 TIME EXTENSIONS CCO Numbers (Note 3) Days Approved CCO Other Days this report Days previously reported. Total days to date , COMPUTATION OF EXTENDED DATE FOR COMPLETION 1. First working day designated 2. Working days specified in contract 3. COMPUTE DATE FOR COMPLETION(if all days specified are workable) 4. Total time extension days approved to date (CCO plus other) 5. Total non -working days to date (Note 4) 6. Sub Total (Line 4 plus Line 5) 7. EXTENDED DATE FOR COMPLETION (Line 3 plus Line 6) 8. Revised working days for contract (Line 2 plus Line 4) 9. Total working days to date 10. WORKING DAYS REMAINING (Line 8 minus Line 9) Controlling Operation(s): Number of Days Numbered Day (Note 4) DAY NO. 462 Date 11/09/1999 45 MMEMEMMEMM 10 10 ............................. 55 45 10 DAY NO. 507 01/20/2000 DAY NO. 517 02/03/2000 Remarks: (Note 5) (Continue on reverse) The Contractor will be allowed fifteen (15) days in which to protest in writing the correctness of the statement; otherwise the statement shall be deemed to have been accepted by the Contractor as correct. NOTE: All footnotes are on the reverse. side. HF:hf P DZ-►6-0o sident Engineer Reviled: 02/15/00 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESIDENT ENGINEER Z, When recording nonworking days due to weather; state the reason why the day was unworkable when the weather description itself does not adequately describe conditions. For example, "Clear -wet grade" to describe conditions when the weather is clear, but the grade is too wet to work.. Do not list days merely as "Unworkable" . 2. Enter days on which no productive work has been performed on the controlling operation (s) .for reasons other than weather. 3 . List numbers of . contract change orders providing for time extensions. 4. Do not include nonworking days which. occur after expiration of .the Extended. DATE OF COMPLETION. On contracts that are overtime, the total under WORKING DAYS shall not begreater than the total of -REVISED WORKING DAYS, (line . a). After approved total of .working days has been -reached, continue recording working and nonworking days but do not add into .the totals. Make statement under REMARKS the WORKING and NONWORKING days are shown for record only since the contract time has elapsed. 5 _ Time extensions other, are to be explained under REMARKS and the following information is to be included: (a) Cause of delay and specification reference/under. which approval was granted. (b) Statement as to what controlling operation• or operations are being delayed and to what extent. (c) Dates for which the extension was granted. (d) Reference to supporting data. ADDITIONAL REMARKS: CITY OF FONTANA WEEKLY STATEMENT OF WORKING DAYS PROJECT: SLOVER AVENUE SEWER PROJECT from HEMLOCK AVENUE TO POPLAR AVENUE TO: BONADIMAN - McCAIN, INC. REPORT N0. 13 The following statement shows the number of working days charged to your contract for the week ending: FEB. 04, 2000. Date Day Weather, Weather Conditions or Other Conditions Working Day Non -Working Days Caused by Weather Working Days No Work Done on Controlling Operation (Note 2) 01/31/2000 Mon. 1 02/01/2000 Tue. CLEAR -SUNNY - 82 Deg. F. 1 02/02/2000 Wed. CLEAR -SUNNY - 82 Deg. F. 1 02/03/2000 Thur. NO ACTIVITY ON JOB SITE 1 02/04/2000 Fri. NO ACTIVITY ON JOB SITE 1 Days this week Days previously reported Total days to date 5 0 0 45 10 0 50 10 0 TIME EXTENSIONS CCO Numbers (Note 3) Days Approved Other CCO Days Days Total this report previously reported. days to date COMPUTATION OF EXTENDED DATE FOR. COMPLETION 1. First working day designated 2. Working days specified in contract 3. COMPUTE DATE FOR COMPLETION(if all days specified are workable) 4. Total time extension days approved to date (CCO plus other) 5. Total non -working days to date (Note 4) 6. Sub Total (Line 4 plus Line 5) 7. EXTENDED DATE FOR COMPLETION (Line 3 plus Line 6) 8. Revised working days for contract (Line 2 plus Line 4) 9. Total working days to date 10. WORKING DAYS REMAINING (Line 8 minus Line 9) Controlling Operation(s): Number of Days 45 Numbered Day (Note 4) DAY NO. 462 Date 11/09/1999 10 10 55 50 5 DAY NO. 507 01/20/2000 DAY NO. 517 02/03/2000 Remarks: (Note 5) (Continue on reverse) The Contractor will be allowed fifteen (15) days in which to protest in writing the correctness of the statement, otherwise the statement shall be deemed to have been accepted by the Contractor as correct. NOTE: A11 footnotes are on the reverse side. HF:hf R�� dent Engineer Revi 02/15/00 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESIDENT ENGINEER 1. When recording nonworking days due to weather; state the reason why the day was unworkable when the weather description itself does not adequately describe conditions. For example, "Clear -wet grade" to describe conditions when the weather is clear, but the grade is too wet to work.. Do not list days merely as "Unworkable". 2 . Enter days on which no productive work has been performed on the controlling ' operation (s) .for reasons other than weather. 3 . List numbers of contract change orders providing for time extensions. 4 . Do not include nonworking days whichoccur after expiration of the Extended DATE OF COMPLETION. On contracts that are overtime, the total under WORKING DAYS shall not be.greater than the total of -REVISED WORKING DAYS, (line . 8). After approved total of .working days has been -reached, continue recording working and nonworking days but do not add into .the totals. Make statement under REMARKS the WORKING and NONWORKING days are shown for :record only since the contract time has elapsed. 5 _ Time extensions other, are to be explained under REMARKS and the following information is to be included: (a) Cause of delay and specification reference/under. which approval was granted. (b) Statement as to what controlling operation• or operations are being delayed and to what extent. (c) Dates for which the extension was granted. (d) Reference to supporting data. ADDITIONAL REMARKS: CITY OF FONTANA WEEKLY STATEMENT OF WORKING DAYS PROJECT: SLOVER AVENUE SEWER PROJECT from HEMLOCK AVENUE TO POPLAR AVENUE REPORT NO. 14 TO: BONADIMAN - McCAIN, INC. The following statement shows the number of working days charged to your contract for the week ending: FEB. 11, 2000, Date Day Weather, Weather Conditions or Other Conditions Working Day Non -Working Days Caused by Weather Working Days No Work Done on Controlling Operation (Note 2) 02/07/2000 Mon. 1 02/08/2000 Tue. CLEAR -SUNNY - 82 Deg. F. 1 02/09/2000 Wed. CLEAR -SUNNY - 82 Deg. F. 1 02/10/2000 Thur. NO ACTIVITY ON JOB SITE 1 02/11/2000 Fri. NO ACTIVITY ON JOB SITE 1 Days this week Days previously reported Total days to date 5 0 0 50 10 0 55 10 0 TIME EXTENSIONS CCO Numbers (Note 3) Days Approved Other CCO Days Days Total this report previously reported. days to date COMPUTATION OF EXTENDED DATE FOR COMPLETION 1. First working day designated 2. Working days specified in contract 3. COMPUTE DATE FOR CO)1PLETION(if all days specified are workable) 4. Total time extension days approved to date '(CCO plus other) 5. Total non -working days to date (Note 4) 6. Sub Total (Line 4 plus Line 5) 7. EXTENDED DATE FOR COMPLETION (Line 3 plus Line 6) 8. Revised working days for contract (Line 2 plus Line 4) 9. Total working days to date 10. WORKING DAYS REMAINING (Line 8 minus Line 9) Controlling Operation(s): Number of Days Numbered Day (Note.4) DAY. NO. 462 Date 11/09/1999 45 10 10 55 55 0 DAY N0. 507 DAY N0. 517 01/20/2000 02/03/2000 Remarks: (Note 5) (Continue on reverse) The Contractor will be allowed fifteen (15) days in which to protest in writing the correctness of the statement: otherwise the statement shall be deemed to have been accepted by the Contractor as correct. NOTE: All footnotes are on the reverse side. HF:hf 2- ident Engineer Revi-d: 02/15/00 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESIDENT ENGINEER 1. When recording nonworking days due to weather; state the reason why the day was unworkable when the weather description itself does not adequately describe conditions. For example, "Clear -wet grade" to describe conditions when the weather is clear, but the grade is too wet to work.. Do not list days merely as "Unworkable" _ 2 . Enter days on which no productive work has been performed on the controlling operation(s) for reasons other than weather. 3 . List numbers of contract change orders providing for time extensions. 4. Do not include nonworking days whichoccur after expiration of the Extended . DATE OF COMPLETION. On contracts that are overtime, the total under WORKING DAYS shall not be .° greater than the total of -REVISED WORKING DAYS, (line8.) - After approved total of .working days has been -reached, continue recording working and nonworking days but do not add into .the totals. Make statement under REMARKS the WORKING and NONWORKING days are shown for :record only since the contract time .has elapsed. 5 _ Tine extensions other, are to be explained under REMARKS and the following information is to be included: (a) Cause of delay and specification reference/under. which approval was granted. (b) Statement as to what controlling operation• or operations are being delayed and to what extent. (c) Dates for which the extension was granted. (d) Reference to supporting data. ADDITIONAL REMARKS: City of Fontana CALIFORNIA Jeff Bonadiman, Vice President Bonadiman-McCain, Inc. 280 South Lena Road San Bernardino, CA 92412 RE: SLOVER AVENUE SEWER FROM HEMLOCK AVENUE TO POPLAR AVENUE Contract Change Order No. 2 Dear Mr. Bonadiman: Enclosed is the original 2 for your records. February 14, 2000 fully executed Contract Change Order No. If you have any questions, 350-6646. Sincerely, please contact the undersigned at (909) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT EngiJngering Division Gregory J. Bucknell, P.E. Principal Civil Engineer/Special Projects CC: Public Works Inspector (J.C.) w/copy of CCO w'ww.fontana.org 8353 SIERRA AVENUE FONTAINA, CALIFORNIA 92335-3528 (909) 350-7600 recvcled paper CITY OF FONTANA ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 395,239.00 ENGINEERING DIVISION ESTIMATE OF COST PROJECT:SLOVER AVENUE SEWER from HEMLOCK AVENUE TO POPLAR AVENUE CONTRACTOR: BONADIMAN-MCCAIN, INC. CONTRACT CO NO. 2 SUPP. DATE :January 20, 2000 THIS CCO TOTAL TO DATE CONTRACT ITEM 1,104.02 $8,218.26 FORCE ACCT. AGREED PRICE 2,666.08 $2,666.08 ADJUSTMENT TOTAL 3,770.10 $10,884.34 % OVER CONTRACT .95t 2.76% 10% CONTINGENCY BALANCE (INCL.THIS CO) $ 21,525.32 You are hereby directed to make the herein described changes from the plans and specifications or do the following described work not included in the plans and specification on the contract. NOTE: This change order is not effective until approved by the City Engineer. NO. CONTRACT DESCRIPTION ITEM NO. OF WORK QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL 1. N/A Utility delay 2" gas line in center of manhole & trench (corner of Elm Street & Jurupa Avenue) 1 LS 2,666.08 2,666.08 2. 2 Additional traffic control 1 LS 739.20 739.20 3. 10 Two (2) foot Overexcavation and re-backfill for two sewer laterals 1 LS 364.82 364.82 Estimated Cost Decrease TOTAL = $3,770.10 or Increase $3,770.10 By reason of this order the time of completion will be adjusted as follows: NONE Submitted by: 1// /,(/ [!� ! Date: Approval Recommended Approved: City Engineer Date: 1/27/00 roject Manager w--e-oat-- Date: /"`a' Page 2 of 2 We, the undersigned contractor, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the word above specified, and will accept" as full payment therefor the prices shown above. Accepted, Date 1 / 2 7 / 0 0 Contractor: Bonadiman-McCain, Inc. By 1-. Title: Vice President eff C. Bonadiman 1/00 HF CITY OF FONTANA Report No. Day Date: 2 t '4 - Q ca INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT Protect• e ® T W Th F S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start Stop: • Hours - Item No. rJ Contractor. lie \ t 4A.TD t M ANA c. Cam; f.1 Remarks (reason for Idleness or other remarks) EQUIPMENT AND I OR LABOR: No. Of Equipment No. Of Men Description (Of Equipment or Labor) rLA-rCD r 2 -3) C. j t.:.t.. t t Li .1? -E.y! 2 Q_.1•)4^.5L1A3A.tscliA Contractor Title Inspector Sheet Of CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT - Protect: Report No. Day Date: 2 - (t - a M T W Th S Circle Day Shift Hours Start Stop: Contractor l dun�.9- EQUIPMENT AND I OR LABOR: No. Of Equipment o. Of Men Description (Of Equipment or Labor) tl'�PS 4P-1,r5s-1S/44,6k. �e51N Lor2 Hours - Item N Weath Remarks(reason for idleness or other remarks) s S 4-4 C4 r c (i f..ye 4;4 r3-r TK-tre.u. ti► n v1(-) A-�n1 hn c p C141p,. l -.zd 0,A4 (C' u s )€-o 's . - 1- d Contractor Title Insp for Sheet 0t CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT Project: Contractor 1-447 AQ- EQUIPMENT AND I OR LABOR: No. Of ! Equipment No. Of Men LL_ Description (0f Equipment or Labor) Hours - Item N Report No. Day Date: I o—®a M T W fi�h F S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start Stop: Weath Remarks (reason for Idleness or other remarks) A- S. ILFueti, 4 Contractor Title Inspec Sheet Of CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT • Protect: Report No. Day_ Date: Z 8 —0 M® W Th F S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start Stop: Hours - Item No. L t4 CAA., S Contractor.A-pi ►'r".3-,....i - • Remarks (reason for Ldleness or other reni1.) EQUIPMENT AND I OR LABOR: No. Of Equipment No. Of Men Description (Of Equipment or Labor) I I (► (eme-s 1-E —j c --r2tu f A.r -r' i A c Clec.c) t S 6 t-• s‘ -r — — - -- ■i . L__�_ . .mil � 11 !" .• trt , Contractor Title � l Inspe%ir, Sheet 0t CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT - Project_ Report No. Day Date: 2. - R --o M T( Th F S S Circle Day Shlft Hours Start Stop: Weath r r Hours -Item No. iat6 1� Contractor: Mew-) , Remarks (reason for idleness or other remarks) EQUIPMENT AND I OR LABOR No. Of Equipment No. Ot Men Description (0i Equipment or Labor) •.l lIr. 8 1 , Lo Mk ir .Ic ''1, / U45.Avkhop -g 19- r*". ra..v V. C.._ - mac- 2 C D- S Ind c E 4oF-b ra.1 F —,__�— ____ , , _ ,. - e [DA_ St--t' cs- Contractor Title Sheet Ot . CITY OF FONTANA Report No. Ow Date Z — "L — o v INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT 69T W T F 9 9 Circe Dsy snit Hour. start Stop Project kTW""pm-r L-�14C Contractor l9-l-)i r c vv.) EQUIPMENT ANO/OR LABOR: HOURS • ITEM NO. WEATHER EQUIPMT. NO. t'f NO. OF MEN DESCRIPTION (Of Equipment or Labor) -3•Tat-1I, I2f Leersw E.,44;u6,04 ll s� Rucam REMARKS (Reason for Idleness or other remarks) ( /*r‘ rn Fbr7J c Gov c a - sv-r� 'W] 1:'T1"t N Q Tr4a'T C Kam-" w\Yl A I -A •C e ' e-cam,. _,XC__c_p -I- i t- &A -r- 3d© c 23e-14-- ep ie.„--:v-fr"-"--ga,,--rud-2 ,.p--1 5c 4--e_ -r (.4-0--r- 'a'' c=-t•-.. 4 S'C--- t&TD Contractor 12/92 JT/clb CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT Project'r" Report No. Oay o.a MTWT 9 Circle Oa ShR Hours 'tart Stop Contractor cgr (.;J EQUIPMENT ANO/OR LABOR: OR: EQUIPMT. NO. 1 NO. OF MEN DESCRIPTION (Of Equipment or Labor) t`!'11 l—Ors u i3r4u�c >^ lGl� Aar- t. A HOURS - ITEM NO. WEATHER (-..L&714 Cl ttl REMARKS (Reaeo'! for Idleness or otter remarks) t. A l", s StT� ri.-• , a ) -e _ CZ 1? - Contractor This Insector t 2/92 JTlib . CITY OF FONTANA Report No. Day Date 2. - '- a o INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT M T W F s 9 Circle Day Stall Hour, 'tart Stop Project g1G1-t,c T- Contractori�-air •�-+� CC�J EQUIPMENT ANO/OR LABOR: HOURS - ITEM NO. WEATHER EQUIPMT. NO. NO. OF MEN DESCRIPTION (Of Equipment or Labor) ,r REMARKS (Reason for lateness or otter remar-v) 9.. Lisp 14.pkt10\N } C 2cs��-.�*�- �- o�b 10 cX-e -c— t Z• tr,-.AA3 `t-c v-�t� -r ' T17 A 51J \,1 & . Contactor "nos In C 12/92 JT/ab . CITY OF FONTANA Repot No. Day Data Z - z INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT M T('l TFSS Circle OW snllt Hour, fort Stop Project I.PA Ter - Contractor ry-% -A-) CC EQUIPMENT ANO/OR LABOR: EQUIPMT. NO. NO. OF MEN 1 I DESCRIPTION (Of E or Labor) Lbessta45ae \ 4y5 K heat HOURS - ITEM NO. 2 WEATHER rm. REMARKS (Reason for idleness or other tornado) Z 41, t/` • t T -e res) �rt=S .� �l tAJE t COr7treCtOr 12/92 JThb CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT Project .--C-IDOEir 2I -57eAker"" Contractor an. va.. I I EQUIPMENT AND/OR LABOR: Report No. Day oats 2 — T Shift Hours EQUIPMT. NO. NO. OF MEN DESCRIPTION (Of Equipment or Ulm) HOURS - FTEM NQ. W T F SS Circle Dey Stan Stop , WEATHER REMAR)<S (Reason for Idleness or other remarks) Vv NA- k41119NI e e le -Le -17-0;cr-r1 go CLe) g trkv-, Contractor Title Insp. 1 2/92 JT/ab CITY OF FONTANA Report No. Day Date 2 —'4 —(= INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT Project • E� Contractor W.cfokirradji /ACGA-r EQUIPMENT AND/OR LABOR: M T W T O S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start Stop HOURS - ITEM NO. WEATHER EQUIPMT. NO. NO. OF MEN DESCRIPTION (Of Equipme t c,r Labor) %rr,G•y,-tea,, /Jv / ice -ram r r r_,a�c -77'24.4c /t tC11-t: C i (lucks REMARKS (Reason for Idleness or / other remarks /DZ4z)Z. c =-E-v ---t A --MSTu�,rs r � —�-e-s , -r —r pe. G e `4 3C �o --7-4 . .. a ,1r - .4--rye- - c 77.5" o_J 7" ,4. e Contractor Title Insp t 2/92 JT/ab • . CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT Project31=es- aLE Contractor r+,Ap, ivrra-.ter EQUIPMENT ANO/OR LABOR: Report No. Day Date 2-4 - M T WO F 9 9 Circle Day Sti f Hours Mart atop EQUIPMT. NO. NO. OF MEN. DESCRIPTION (Of Equipment or Labor) HOURS - REM NO. WEATHER near - REMARKS (FMaion.for Idleness or other remarks) C�ne..._A--r_Ar-Me_ctir— .e.44•1,4-> Vida ---rut • t t : Contractor 12J92 JTJab . CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT Project L�'7L1�� AQC Contractor�l w' +" EQUIPMENT ANOI'OR LABOR: Report No. Day 0ab 2-1- ac. M 6 W T F S 9 Circle OW Shot Hours Mart Stop HOURS - ITEM NO. WEATHER EQUIPMT. NO. NO. OF MEN 0E80:IPPON (Of Equipment or Labor) �J • pt�'1 1(iPs, R. • 1'X'S IA-c., 6.4) q4i - bat& he54,7 2 2L. REMARKS (Reason for Idleness or other remark)) t*'C"FaMS"A.An t.A-D n t 1r't&L (EC T c1-1-• c2 'l.42e A = N L,"e_ .r tz ZV 87'Fr F (D .r ?r• gJ \-W0. S . T�1 F CA 1 i-o, t''1 -t`17 re --,-.`s'174,..1L l/s..c- L9-1..'. F'J d' S A... V\n e)...1 \h ckla- At- .. C`-. -Dr ts- -,ram• A-.S a,1.rA. -r- s2r e3 -t_ 1 x..._, c._.o 'S T S Contractor CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT Project:.--1 a-c ((d to Report No. Day Date: M T W. Th F S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start Stop: Hours - Item N Weather Contractor EQUIPMENT AND I OR LABOR: No. Of EgWpment No. Of Men Description (or Equipment or Labor) �45 �cpi=> Ci2CSw't52valc emarks (reason for Idleness or other remarks) 2 ft. VI cll., • (lee 1 Contractor Title Inspector Sheet Ot I CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT • Project Cat TeX s u E c Contractor J t MIkt•1 4 1�� (�A1►�l - EQUIPMENT AND/OR LABOR: Report No. Day Dab I. — 2C,-C�C7 M T F 9 9 Circle Day Shirt Hours Stan Stop EQUIPMT. NO. NO. OF MEN DESCAPTION (Of Equipment or Labor) HOURS - ITEM NO. WEATHER L.1- (VA(' / WI'm 1 t. REMARKS (Reason for Idleness or other remarks) Contractor TVs InsipectOr t 2/92 JT/ab LICENSE NO. 74600A;B&C27 INCORPORATED 1942 TELEPHONE (909) 885-3435 TELECOPIER (909) 889-3706 January 25, 2000 0 fi r ` �k• :�y McCain Inc. Engineers *Contractors CITY OF FONTANA ATTN: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 8353 SIERRA AVENUE FONTANA, CA 92335 FAX: (909) 350-6618 POST OFFICE BOX 6444 SAN BERNARDINO, CALIF. 92412 0( RE: SLOVER AVENUE SEWER IMPROVEMENTS HEMLOCK AVENUE TO POPLAR AVENUE CITY OF FONTANA OFFICE 280 SOUTH LENA ROAD SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408 YARD 635 TENNIS COURT LANE SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408 Via Mail INVOICE NO. 004 JOB NO. 33.501 This is the billing for progress billing Invoice No. 004 for the above referenced job. ❑ ORIGINAL 0 COPY/DUPLICATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AMOUNT DUE INVOICE NO. 004: $ 137,422.10 Less Retention: ($ 13,742.21) TOTAL AMOUNT DUE INVOICE NO. 004 If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact our office. VENDOR 0 P.Q.iO.D,t r'ARTAL DMPLEY'E , _ O) 3i_W r".�7 ACM 0 • Wait AMERICA PROGRESSES THROUGH CONSTRUCTION ellaeltr4Ce 4 edarizact Bonadiman-McCain, Inc. 280 So. Lena Road P.O. Box 6444 San Bernardino. Ca. 92412 CITY OF FONTANA Slover Avenue Sewer Improvements - Hemlock Avenue to Poplar Avenue Bid No. SB 04-00 Progress Estimate: 004 Period Ending: 01/25/00 Contract Total Quantity Amount Total Total Percent Item # Description Unit Contract Unit Contract Previous Previous This This Quantity Contract Complete Quantity Prices Amount Quantity Amount Estimate Estimate To Date To Date To Date 1 Clearing and Grubbing LS 1.00 19330.00 19,330.00 1.00 19,330.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 19,330.00 100.00% 2 Traffic Control, Signing and Striping LS 1.00 30370.00 30,370.00 0.90 27,333.00 0.00 0.00 0.90 27,333.00 90.00% 3 Potholing EA 35.00 450.00 15,750.00 22.00 9,900.00 13.00 5,850.00 35.00 15,750.00 100.00% 4 12" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer LF 3090.00 59.00 182,310.00 2600.00 153,400.00 490.00 28,910.00 3090.00 182,310.00 100.00% 5 8" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer LF 658.00 65.00 42,770.00 0.00 0.00 548.00 35,620.00 548.00 35,620.00 83.28% 6 8" Class 250 Ductile Iron Pipe Sewer LF 161.00 45.00 7,245.00 0.00 0.00 161.00 7,245.00 161.00 7,245.00 100.00% (SUBST.: 8" PVC W/CONC. ENCASEMENT) 7 Sewer Manhole per City of Fontana Det. #112 EA 11.00 2800.00 30,800.00 8.00 22,400.00 3.00 8,400.00 11.00 30,800.00 100.00% 8 Sewer Manhole w/flat top entry shaft EA 3.00 2550.00 7,650.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 7,650.00 3.00 7,650.00 100.00% 9 Connection to existing Sewer Manhole LS 1.00 1000.00 1,000.00 1.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1,000.00 100.00% 10 6" Sewer Lateral EA 32.00 852.00 27,264.00 0.00 0.00 32.00 27,264.00 32.00 27,264.00 100.00% 11 Temporary Asphalt Concrete Pavement TONS 525.00 40.00 21,000.00 525.00 21,000.00 0.00 0.00 525.00 21,000.00 100.00% 12 Permanent Asphalt Concrete Pavement (Hemlo TONS 100.00 80.00 8,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 13 Class 2 Aggregate Base CY 50.00 - 35.00 1,750.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% CHANGE ORDER NO. 001 1 INCREASE TEMPORARY ASPHALT TONS 27.91 40.00 1,116.40 27.91 1,116.40 0.00 0.00 27.91 1,116.40 100.00% 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND STRIPING LS 1.00 5,997.84 5,997.84 1.00 5,997.84 0.00 0.00 1.00 5,997.84 100.00% CHANGE ORDER NO. 002 1 UTILITY DELAY 2" GAS LINE (ELM ST.) LS 1.00 2,666.08 2,666.08 0.00 0.00 1.00 2,666.08 1.00 2,666.08 100.00% 2 ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1.00 739.20 739.20 0.00 0.00 1.00 739.20 1.00 739.20 100.00% 3 2' OVEREXCAV./REBACKFILL 2 SEWER LAT. LS 1.00 364.82 364.82 0.00 0.00 1.00 364.82 1.00 364.82 100.00% CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 1 INCREASE 12" V.C.P. LF 226.00 59.00 13,334.00 0.00 0.00 226.00 13,334.00 226.00 13,334.00 100.00% 2 DECREASE 8" PVC W/CONC. ENCASEMENT LF -65.00 45.00 (2,925.00) 0.00 0.00 -65.00 (2,925.00) -65.00 (2,925.00) 100.00% 3 INCREASE 6" SEWER LATERIAL EA 2.00 852.00 1,704.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1,704.00 2.00 1,704.00 100.00% 4 INCREASE TEMPORARY ASPHALT TONS 53.69 40.00 2,147.60 38.69 1,547.60 15.00 600.00 53.69 2,147.60 100.00% Totals: 420,383.94 263024.84 137,422.10 400,446.94 Prepared By: Janice Guinn Total Contract Items Complete: 137,422.10 400,446.94 Total Material On Hand: 0.00 0.00 Bookkeeper Total Work Done/Materials on Hand: 137,422.10 400,446.94 Reviewed By: William W. Bonadiman Deductions/Retention: Retention @ 10 % 13,742.21 40,044.69 President Other Deductions: 0.00 0.00 Total Deductions/Retention: 13,742.21 40,044.69 Total Amount Due To Date: 123,679.89 360,402.25 Less Previous Payments: 0.00 126,789.52 Amount Due Previous Invoices: 0.00 109,932.84 33501.004.wk4 Amount Due This Invoice: 123,679.89 123,679.89 REVIEWED BY CITY INSPECTOR: DATE: Bonadiman-McCain, Inc. 280 So. Lena Road P.O. Box 6444 San Bernardino. Ca. 92412 CITY OF FONTANA Stover Avenue Sewer Improvements - Hemlock Avenue to Poplar Avenue Bid No. SB 04-00 Progress Estimate: 004 Period Ending: 01/25/00 Contract otal uantity mount otal otal Percent Item # Description Unit Contract Unit Contract Previous Previous This This Quantity Contract Complete Quantity Prices Amount ' Quantity Amount Estimate Estimate To Date To Date To Date 1 Clearing and Grubbing LS 1.00 19330.00 19,330.00 1.00 19,330.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 19,330.00 100.00% 2 Traffic Control, Signing and Striping LS 1.00 30370.00 30,370.00 0.90 27,333.00 0.00 0.00 0.90 27,333.00 90.00% 3 Potholing EA 35.00 450.00 15,750.00 22.00 9,900.00 13.00 5,850.00 35.00 15,750.00 100.00% 4 12" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer LF 3090.00 59.00 182,310.00 2600.00 •153,400.00 490.00 28,910.00 3090.00 182,310.00 100.00% 5 8" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer LF 658.00 65.00 42,770.00 0.00 0.00 548.00 35,620.00 548.00 35,620.00 83.28% 6 8" Class 250 Ductile Iron Pipe Sewer LF 161.00 45.00 7,245.00 0.00 0.00 161.00 7,245.00 161.00 7,245.00 100.00% 7 Sewer Manhole per City of Fontana Det. #112 EA 11.00 2800.00 30,800.00 8.00 22,400.00 3.00 8,400.00 11.00 30,800.00 100.00% 8 Sewer Manhole w/flat top entry shaft EA 3.00 2550.00 7,650.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 7,650.00 _ 3.00 7,650.00 100.00% 9 Connection to existing Sewer Manhole LS 1.00 1000.00 1,000.00 1.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1,000.00 100.00% 10 6" Sewer Lateral EA 32.00 852.00 27,264.00 0.00 0.00 32.00 27,264.00 32.00 27,264.00 •100.00% 11 Temporary Asphalt Concrete Pavement TONS 525.00 40.00 21,000.00 563.69 22,547.60 0.00 0.00 563.69 22,547.60 107.37% 12 Permanent Asphalt Concrete Pavement (Hemlo TONS 100.00 80.00 8,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 13 Class 2 Aggregate Base CY 50.00 35.00 1,750.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% CHANGE ORDER NO. 001 1 INCREASE TEMPORARY ASPHALT TONS 27.91 40.00 1,116.40 27.91 1,116.40 0.00 0.00 27.91 1,116.40 100.00% 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND STRIPING LS 1.00 5,997.84 5,997.84 1.00 5,997.84 0.00 0.00 1.00 5,997.84 100.00% CHANGE ORDER NO. 002 1 UTILITY DELAY 2" GAS LINE (ELM ST.) LS 1.00 2,666.08 2,666.08 0.00 0.00 1.00 2,666.08 1.00 2,666.08 100.00% 2 ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1.00 739.20 739.20 0.00 0.00 1.00 739.20 1.00 739.20 100.00% 3 2' OVEREXCAV./REBACKFILL 2 SEWER LAT. LS 1.00 364.82 364.82 ,: 0.00 0.00 1.00 364.82 1.00 364.82 100.00% CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 1 INCREASE 12" V.C.P. LF 226.00 59.00 13,334.00 0.00 0.00 226.00 13,334.00 226.00 13,334.00 100.00% 2 DECREASE 8" DUCTILE IRON PIPE(P.V.C.) LF -65.00 45.00 (2,925.00) 0.00 0.00 -65.00 (2,925.00) -65.00 (2,925.00) 100.00% 3 INCREASE 6" SEWER LATERIAL EA 2.00 852.00 1,704.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1,704.00 2.00 1,704.00 100.00% 4 INCREASE TEMPORARY ASPHALT TONS 15.00 40.00 600.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 600.00 15.00 600.00 100.00% • Totals: 418,836.34 263024.84 137,422.10 400,446.94 Prepared By: Janice Guinn Total Contract Items Complete: 137,422.10 400,446.94 r Total Material On Hand: ,0.00 0.00 Bookkeeper Total Work Done/Materials on Hand: 137,422.10 400,446.94 Reviewed By: William W. Bonadiman Deductions/Retention: Retention @ 10 % 13,742.21 40,044.69 President Other Deductions: 0.00 0.00 Total Deductions/Retention: 13,742.21 40,044.69 Total Amount Due To Date: 123,679.89 360,402.25 Less Previous Payments: 0.00 126,789.52 Amount Due Previous Invoices: 0.00 109,932.84 33501.004.wk4 Amount Due This Invoice: 123,679.89 123,679.89 REVIEWED BY CITY INSPECTOR: DATE: . CITY OF FONTANA Report No. Day Dote (- 2 S-c5o INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT Men► T F s s chow or, Wit Hours Start Stop Project? T ►'yca,.,Lyz.x.. Contractor d-*--+P,i7 re-i-^- 4 FG%-1tv EQUIPMENT ANO/OR LABOR EQUIPMT. NO. NO. OF MEN OESCRFTION (Of Equipment or Libor) HOURS - REM NO. WEATHER REMARKS (Reason for Idleness or otter remerto) e- war tLe..) rc f A--S p. S CA 1-e11.I..i t .ti ¢ 1 / O-rE : 1 S L1 s . / ( • tJ.r-,--r \ 6i‘n tw.Ct-vv Ae -"Tr--r, t E -1 - ,n —r TC) e- r Ares i----N / t/a. LA f=17 1341' t. rv. a►.N S elsici S, e i.l1 Cecil 1 rc.ST -r-o r- 4Lti `ti? -c-c) - 8 L-r c: ,•.-._.'C nil w...tm. 1 s" Cam CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT Project`-'ii3_E l Hours - Item N Contractorty Report No. Dar Date: i -— M T W. Th F S S Circle Day SWft Hours Start Stop: Weather EQUIPMENT AND I OR LABOR: . Remarks (reason for idleness or other remarks) No. Of Equipment No. Of Men Description (Of Equipment or Labor) 1 1.4,1I5 ?j et �►n.e 0 ----- I txta--re.c Tirzue44- 3 c/air -r12.0c1e, 1-pi c.CA- cr10 1 csr.e►..-r..,r j . 1J1 1 4...A05r 12-/C7ONzN.s..,�S U1/4.1 P e [MA-Trna-7 -Z-- 'Lc C kr"r-- -a- C C-CA r<= l' ma`s-tn� t 2,1 C_ .1 r --.p L ;r�s-rP. . Contractor Title Inspector, Sheet Of . CITY OF FONTANA Report No. Day INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT Project S 1 CDOCr' J Scrwt? r Contractor nt MC CA EQUIPMENT ANO/OM LABOR: Date 1 -- L 9 — z.)a MTWTFSS Circle Day She Hours Mart Sox, EQUIPMT. NO. NO. OF MEN DESCRIPTION (Of Equipment or Labor) HOURS - ITEM NO. ,r REMARKS (R.aaon for Idlmees or otter remark) 1 SI"ram l,.s-T-ii!t 'C 4 z-_s \AAC rrX,GJa-t --rr-, r—c7 — -rt.. c tom_ c^,, -r• u, Ohrtx.,-,.r- . ( F.-- ,rYti 14 d.l. Z. is..,- .-r-ie, coo-� ocD ...._ 1-,r- C..,�..�.r--ram \� . P ' r-�' t 9j c,w-� u.t4-c. -T-D i izs `t_,v-r> it cc,ra e- Contractor 12/92 J T/ab . CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT Project SI c r /-C/4. ��e Contractor 1;•i'l It MAte� k �.11C Leo-• � EQUIPMENT ANO/OR LABOR Report No. Day Dat. I— i9_--c M W T F S S Circle Osy Shift Hours Start Stop EQUIPMT. NO. 2 Z NO. OF MEN 2 DESCRIPTION (Of Equipment or Labor) 555,441e ckt.tr r W,scTEtc' 'TR0 ci It1V TIZ.JG� I�IGk.` t,3 93o L.oaDEr- 3 8 8 6 8 HOURS • ITEM NO. WEATHER ,h REMARKS (Reason for Idleness or otter remarks) Larali.sei r S 'I 8 or—, — 5\'-rLEI- /kJ • T141 1 < <t tk—rw .. S Oo' 7. t r-rw r tiv\A,..4 -P s CIZZTLN 1 S —re L t , e Z 1' -‹ c-y►.7 f ' ST► Contractor TIt1s • FAX COMMUNICATIONS FAX NUMBER: (909) 350-6618 PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING PAGES TO : NAME: Kum• Yost-C I t LOCATION : FAX: q4 9- �I 1 Z- 3 4 4+ 5 PHONE: FROM: TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES : ( INCLUDING COVER SHEET) LOCATION / PHONE: DATE: I ce I . CITY OF F C.ALIFORNIA O Q272. Jeeonav4.o Rd. I<of,.,e. G,au.er, gtcra 9,-19 _ ` -4z 5444 i dC Ar.17�A4.tA. C.A. • 1-•/8-oo TIME : i `'"3,e:3 pprl 1 MESSAGE: RGAs- ikA/ I vNg--vaAl.e. 6c) vimmtst...J--r CITY OF FONTANA ENGINEERING DIVISION 8353 SIERRA AVENUE, FONTANA , CA 92335 PHONE NUMBER : (909) 350-76I0 CC: N T A N A 01/18/00 TUE 13:48 FAX 15624634974 OCCO FIELD OPERATIONS Remarks: Carlos: :0005.Mi•ssion,Mill.Road %:Whittier; Cahforniia:•:90608,=0985.: : :::: ; (562). 948 4242 Off. ; ::. (562) 6.95.9267; Fax Date: Jan. 18, 2000 To: Carlos Navarro City of Fontana Telephone: 909/350-6632 Fax No. 909/350-6618 Pages Including Fax Cover Sheet: 5 From: Craig Rohrer, Project Manager cc: File, Gilbert Ascencio Project: Jurupa Industrial Center Improvements Subject: Marlay Ave. Street Settlement See attached letter dated Jan. 13, 2000 from NorCal regarding Marlay Ave. compaction tests and review of trench failure. It appears we have two conflicting compaction test reports. Per our telephone conversation earlier today you indicated that a copy of the recommendation report by Ninyo & Moore, 'which apparently just came in to your office today, would be faxed to rne. Can you please fax this to me, I have not received it as of 1:30PM. Please call if you have any questions. Thanks, Craig Q1/18/00 TUE 13:48 FAX 15624634974 OCCO FIELD OPERATIONS rw,.�.n�"vv tnGCntr�� 20C r77 741-27 U'I / 10 ' UO 1.5: 1 / N0.648 01 002 NorCal Engineering Soils and Geotechniical Consultants 10641 Humbolt Street Los Alamitos, CA 90720 (562) 799-9469 Fax (562) 799-9459 January 13, 1999 Project Number 6460-96 Western Realco 500 Newport Center Dr_ Suite 630 Newport Beach Ca, 92647 Attn: Mr. Vance Mape Po�ax Note 7671 Ii Val J[l b papoo�a " � I T T � r Fro 1L CoJDNA. J r;a Prio►1n NN�/,l, f Phunu 9t ��/� Fax J�s'�i(ei , q2 1- �,, PO" RE: Compaction Tests and Review of Trench Failure Area — Storm Drain Trench - Located on Marlay Avenue, in the City of Fontana, California References: 1) Compaction Test Results — Marlay Avenue Pavement Distress — Fontana, California by Ninyo & Moore, Project No. 200646-15, dated December 10, 1999 2) Final Compaction Report — Observation and Testing for Proposed Jurupa Industrial Center — Located on Jurupa, Mulberry and Marlay Avenue, in the City of Fontana, California, by NorCal Engineering, Project No. 6460-96, dated September 30, 1999. Dear Mr. Mape: Pursuant to your request, this firm has provided compaction tests at the above referenced project. Results of the compaction tests are attached and locations of these tests are shown on the accompanying Site Plan. All work was performed in accordance with all present day standards of the Geotechnical Engineering Industry. Laboratory/Field Testing The relative compaction was determined by Sand Cone Method (ASTM: D-1556-82) and by the Drive Tube Method (ASTM; D-2937). The maximum density of the fill soils wash obtained by the laboratory standard (ASTM: D-1557-91) and results are shown on Table' I. Results of field density tests are presented in Table II. 01/18/00 TUE 13:48 FAX 1562463.49i4 OCCO FIELD OPERATIONS , ,v�l\r/�LLI'IVLIy.r,.Gnl1Y7 �Oc r77 7477 U IIIZi 00 15:1 ( PIU.648 U2 1003 January 13, 2000 Page 2 Project Nurnber 6460-96 Findinga The attached compaction test results indicate that the upper backfill materials have been cornpacted to at least 90% compaction, These upper soils were noted to be dense and damp and are suitable for support of pavement. Some deeper Solis (i.e. from 2 feet over top of pipe, around pipe sides and below pipe) were found to be loose to medium dense. It appears that some of these soils may not have been properly water Jetted in order to facilitate consolidation of the material in the pipe zone. It is our experience, however, that in this area of Fontana, the Underlying native soils are only medium dense, at best, and testing of soils below the actual pipe will Undoubtedly reveal sub-90% compaction rates. These native soils, however, are suitable to support they backfill placed. It is a further finding of NorCal Engineering that the backfill materials over the storm drain currently tested are suitable for support of the roadway. The following observations and conclusions are also put forth: • If compaction test results as provided by Nirtyo and Moore in their December 10, 1999, report were indeed accurate, substantial settlements of the trench would already have occurred. Not only would such low density soilsi consolidate on their own, but the constant traffic vibrations and direct applications of traffic loadings on the trench from heavy truck traffic would also hasten such settlements. • The area of the trench which has been damaged is obviously the result of the area being saturated with water and a substantial amount of soil being washed away underground. Evidence that supports this theory is; i, Upon initial failure of the area, water was observed seeping into the excavation from the north. NorCal Engineering • 01/18/00 TUE 13:49 FAX 15624634974 OCCO FIELD OPERATIONS l...r�� r�L�rwyllGGf�111�7 .7O� r77 7�t7 U I/ i U0 15:1 N0.648 03 C 1004 January 13, 2000 Project Number 6460-96 Page 3 2, Areas of sidewalks adjacent to the failure have been undermined and eroded, probably from the same water source. It was reported that there was indeed a water leak on the site to the north in the vicinity of the failure which is the likely cause of the damage, NorCal Engineering recommends that all water service, sewer and storm drains be inspected thoroughly to assure no leaks are present. Once thls Is established, the existing failed trench area may be permanently repaired. The remainder of the trench backfill has performed exceptionally well and no further work in this area is deemed necessary. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Respectfully submit NORCAL ENGI Keith D, Tuc Project Engi R.G.E. 841 NorCal Engineering ?,(.16 Mark A. Burkholder Project Manager • �- NOI��ALCNUINttKLNU 15624634974 ei(- 9 V459 OCCO FIELD 001 /18 '00 13:17 NO. 648 04' V]005 January 13, 2000 Project Number 6460-96 Page 4 Soil Type TABLE I MAXIMUM DENSITY TESTS ]ASTIYI: 0-1587.911 Classification SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty with gravel Optimum Moisture 9.0 Maximum Dry Density (Ibs,/CL,fL 129,0 It Silty SAND Ilne to medium grained, 12.5 120.0 with occasional gravel In city SAND fine to Coarse grained, 8.0 132,0 with gravel and rock tV Silty SAND, (Ine grained 13.0 113.0 V Silty SAND, fine grained 14.0 120.0 TABLE 11 COMPACTION TESTS Date of Test Percent Unit Wt. Relative Soli Test No, Locations StationsDepkh" Moisture Ibs.JcUXt. eomp9ction Type 11/11/99 101 Marley Avenue 23+73 4.5-5.0 12,8 116.1 90 I 11/11/99 102" Marley Avenue 23+73 6,5-7.0 10.7 108,3 04 I 11/11/99 103" Marley Avenue 23+73 14.5-15.0 12.9 109,4 91 II 11/15/99 104 Marlay Avenue 31+72 3.0-3.5 2.8 123.5 94 III 11/15/99 105" Marley Avenue 31+72 6.0-6.5 9.9 112.3 87 I 11/15/99 106"" Marley Avenue 31+72 8,0.8,5 7,6 106.4 82 11/16/99 107 Marley Avenue 28+74 3.5-4.0 9.1 103,3 91 IV 11/16/99 108'" Marley Avenue 28+74 7.5.8.0 7.4 104.1 92 IV 11/16/99 109 Marley Avenue 251-74 3.5 d,0 7.9 110.5 92 V 11/16/99 110" Morley Avenue 25+74 7.5-8.0 12.2 98.4 82 V 11/18/99 111" Marley Avenue 2547d 10.5-11.0 12.7 97.2 81 V 'Depth below finish grade (in feet) "Tests taken In and below pipe zona, These areas are beyond the scope of original backfill compaction testing, NorCal Engineering q0 City of Fontana CALIFORNIA Jeff Bonadiman, Vice President Bonadiman-McCain, Inc. 280 South Lena Road San Bernardino, CA 92412 RE: SLOVER AVENUE SEWER FROM. HEMLOCK AVENUE TO POPLAR AVENUE Contract Change Order No. 2 Dear Mr. Bonadiman: January 20, 2000 Enclosed are two original sets of Contract Change Order No. 2. Please sign both original sets and return for City's execution. One fully executed original set will be returned to you for your files. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at (909) 350-6646. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Engineering Division Gregdry . Bucknell, P.E. Principa Civil Engineer/Special Projects cc: Associate Engineer/Special Projects www.fontana.org 8353 SIERRA AVENUE FONTANA, CALIFORNIA 92335-3528 (909) 350-7600 recycled paper CITY OF FONTANA ENGINEERING DIVISION ORIGINAL CONTRACT .MOUNT $ 395,239.00 ESTIMATE OF COST PROJECT:SLOVER AVENUE SEWER from HEMLOCK AVENUE TO POPLAR AVENUE CONTRACTOR: BONADIMAN-MCCAIN, INC.. CONTRACT CO NO. 2 SUPP. DATE :January 20, 2000 THIS CCO TOTAL TO DATE CONTRACT ITEM 1,104.02 $8,218.26 FORCE ACCT. AGREED PRICE 2,666.08 $2,666.08 ADJUSTMENT TOTAL 3,770.10 $10,884.34 % OVER CONTRACT .95% 2.76% 10% CONTINGENCY BALANCE (INCL.THIS CO) $ 21,525.32 You are hereby directed to make the herein described changes from the plans and specifications or do the following described work not included in the plans and specification on the contract. NOTE: This change order is not effective until approved by the City Engineer. NO. CONTRACT DESCRIPTION ITEM NO. OF WORK QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL 1. N/A Utility delay 2" gas line in center of manhole & trench (corner of Elm Street & Jurupa Avenue) 1 LS 2,666.08 2,666.08 2. 2 Additional traffic control 1 LS 739.20 739.20 3. 10 Two (2) foot Overexcavation and re-backfill for two sewer laterals 1 LS 364.82 364.82 TOTAL = $3,770.10 Estimated Cost Decrease or Increase $3,770.10 By reason of this order the time of completion will be adjusted as follows: NONE Submitted by: Date: Field Inspector Approval Recommended: Date: Project Manager Approved: City Engineer Date: Page 2 of 2 We, the undersigned contractor, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the word above specified, and will accept as full payment therefor the prices shown above. Accepted, Date Contractor: By: Title: 1/00 HF Jeff Bonadiman, Vice President Bonadiman-McCain, Inc. 280 South Lena Road San Bernardino, CA 92412 RE: City of Fontana CALIFORNIA Slover Avenue Sewer from Hemlock Avenue to Poplar Avenue Revised Sewer Improvement Plans December 22, 1999 Dear Mr. Bonadiman: Enclosed is a revised set. of sewer improvement plans for the above referenced project. The revisions to the plans are shown as Delta 1 on Sheet No. l and Sheet No. 5. The construction from Sta. No. 86+50.52 (Manhole No. 10) to Sta. No. 94+90 (Manhole No. 14) shall be done as per the revisions shown on Sheet No. 5.;,. Please contact the undersigned at (909) 350-6645, if anyadditional information is.'. required. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Engineering Division Yousuf Patanwala, P.E. Associate Civil Engineer/Special Projects cc: City Engineer Principal Civil Engineer/Special Projects Engineering Tech I/Special Projects Public Works Senior Inspector (W/Plans) Public Works Inspector (JC) Michael P. Thornton, Project Manager/L.D. King, Inc. John P. Leuer, LOR Geotechnical Group, Inc. (W/Plans) Joe Defillips, Project Superintendent/Bonadiman-McCain, Inc. (W/Plans) www.fontana.org 8353 SIERRA AVENUE FONTANA, CALIFORNIA 92335-3528 (909) 350-7600 recycled paper . CITY OF FONTANA Report No. Day Date t- ls-cx. INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT • MTWTF SS Circle Day Stitt Hours Start Step Projectaier- C\EUPZQV Contractor A.AA.Dt M A,r ) WC J-4:1 EQUPMENT AND/OR LABOR: EOUIPMT. NO. NO. OF MEN DESCRIPTION (Of Equipment or Labor) HOURS - REM NO. WEATHER (Reason for Idleness or REMARKS other remarks) v• S t-c �, a ► a c -r t c511/4-5 Q P. —v.J� "'L� ex-t • ��•� �_ 's- c -rt-r, c ttc ory C"eTn-� "e--1.4L e=A S u3 %.--r %.& —Oh �?aar'-[� JAL. •-e D 4 K C _e-,r xpr • Contractor T1t1a Ingo 12i92 %mob CITY OF FONTANA Report No. Day Date: INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT Project tsr. "Lg. ...o ✓ Wnnrc . itam Nn T W. Th . F S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start Stop: Wa contractor ,ACC:Ickf' /4At(„ ` J . Remarks (reason tor Idleness or other remarks) EQUIPMENT AND I OR LABOR. No. Of Equipment No. Of Men Description (Of Equipment or Labor) r sSS/� Ise _ r rt �- «< • 2 --)<ck ---�— . . 1 .� q313 Z- cwris.r -_ 3 s ( -r - -i- sr- CREW (e5pCl fa i rA. r) 7,6% . (nen +14- I -- L.., 1 --PP c Ca ( -- (Q 2. -e 5 % Contractor Title ins . ect Sheet 0[ . CITY OF FONTANA Report No. Day Oa I - 14 cd INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT M T W TOS 9 Circle Oa Shift Hours tut Sew Project S L9U Contractor AID I rsn 4N •' KA EQUIPMENT ANO/OM LABOR: EQUIPMT. NO. 2- NO. OF MEN / DEOCRIPT1ON (Of or Labor) 53's y C, hn e. t,s -re5,r 8 S HOURS - ITEM NO. WEATHER REMARKS (Region for Idlanaa or otter remark* z 1 z Tf�/�►-,tea* v am,, -ter ._� -ryac-cam r- 1 s �N •'t-r ,,,, ,-r ,Ncc►ava-r;/.2, tic c i� y C.P. (_f -t-' S , .—r 5-rr-%r1 L S --� r .�I (4 ) (- I — (�ti-} 99 ._.. (oco +A r - 4-F k 1 - 4-1a 4 a (p A -1- 1;3 (n . ,mac C • mac, Vy-A-rtc ( t' c-p,Ii ...e • -t-o --rcn.r in1e T 1 ti, . Contractor Title !nap 12/92 JT/ab CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT Drnlo,.r• GPI f -c Sly r L-� JF / c_L9�-� _ RE), ct No. Day Date: I — % — do M T W ThS S Circle Day Shift Hours Start Stop: Hours - Item No. -1C-�p�,t� Contractor. f)4, ,64.3 t AAA -kJ CA4,--1 t.....1 1 Remarks (reason for idleness or other remarks) EQUIPMENT AND I OR LABOR: No. Of Equipment No. Of Men Description (Of Equipment or Labor) Contractor Title inspecto Sheet Of CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT AN, No. Day Date: (— ( C:3 c7 MTWUh F S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start Stop: . Hours -Item No. ice(( 14 ( Z__I L s Contractor. I. -A C l Ot�L4,l7 f iMi4N f� C Remarlcs (reason for idleness or other remarks) EQUIPMENT AND I OR LABOR: No. Of Equipment No. Of Men Description (Of Equipment or Labor) ,S ` 1 C It \-"Jl -fir k <_ C_ eJ,v • Contractor Title Insp Sheet Of CITY OF FONTANA Report No. Day Date: ( - — INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT M T ®Th F S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start Stop: Hours -Item No. d €icy (J6,.t.,&...,...---\ Contractor. PI lac A'17t nnA00 (oBv j • Remarks (reason for idleness or other remarks) EQUIPMENT AND I 0 • LABOR: No. Of Equipment No. Of Men Description (Of Equipment or Labor) c 3o CaT Lore tg i S5 nir'r Z2.5 « .. fs 1 wv..-c a 712..1�1c .8 Pr t.4..! ..,,Fl�. <<L . � 2. O/ t TE.),4 s-rE,r .. . G5 d U . C' O mr.-tta-- - 5 tJafOr• AM. A-M r1.1 rA.A/C)e. c F_Xr _l a-c� t J-rt. 15 a i� ��a� r -P. 1 +41� -�-r�s •a! 1 c--1 �,nr-� ] s -re- tdi=S eta Contractor Sheet Of CITY OF FONTANA 44( INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT Protect 5 �—� Hours - Item N Report No. Darr Date: M W. Th F S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start Stop: Weather Contractor: etAc(A.Ei _ 7 0 . AND I OR LABOR: Remarks (reason for Idleness or other remarks) ,EQUIPMENT No. Of Equipment No. 0[ Men Description (0[ Equipment or Labor) / ci-C, (- c- 8. / 2...3s- 'C-kcfNu-Frc- j- / -2-2-r. 1 l• t( v'T' s„4. . ii— - _ k .. ..• O l!,Y .._... .- { i�l�/ e t S rc — 4 (., & rS. 1 4F�bF� yZl /71�1 CT� �Y✓lc�V �KCi-r—j iZe9 r l�I�,A� ♦�..ek�t! d# 9 4 - Contractor Title Sheet Of LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL CITY OF FONTANA CDD/ENGINEERING DIVISION 8353 SIERRA AVENUE FONTANA, CA, 92335 TO: Project: Slover Avenue Sewer from Hemlock Avenue to Poplar Avenue Date: December 28, 1999 Metropolitian Water District Mills Filtration Plant 550 E. Alessandro Riverside, CA 92508 ATTN: Charles Poling, Engineering Technician III We are sending you: (X) Attached ( ) Under seperate cover via the following item(s) : ( ) Drawing ( ) Prints (X) Plans ( ) Samples ( ) Specifications ( ) Copy of Letter ( ) Change Order ( ) Check Prints ( ) Studies (X) Other: Enclosed is a revised set of Sewer Improvement Plans for the above referenced proiect. The revisions to the plans are shown as Delta 1 on Sheet No. 1 and Sheet No. 5. The construction from Sta. No. 86+50.52 (Manhole No. 10) to Sta. No. 94+90 (Manhole No. 14) shall be done per the revisions on Sheet No. 5. COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 Set 12/28/99 Dwg No. 2767 Sheets '1 thru 8 Purpose: (X) For your information/records (X) For approval ( ) Approved as submitted (X) For your use ( ) Approved as noted ( ) As requested prints (X) For review and comment ( ) Returned for corrections ( ) Other ( ) For bid due: ,19 ( ) Prints returned after loaned Please ( ) Submit orginal ( ) Resubmit copies for approval ( ) Submit copies for distribution ( ) Return corrected ( ) Other to: Remarks: Hand delivered 1 Set of Revised Plans to MWD's Patroller Inspector, Conrad Martinez at the job site by Bob Savant/SR. Public Works Inspector for the City. Copy to: Signe Date: %D/o`Z5 Jeff Bonadiman, Vice President Bonadiman-McCain, Inc. 280 South Lena Road San Bernardino, CA 92412 RE: City of Fontana CALIF ORNIA Slover Avenue Sewer from Hemlock Avenue to Poplar Avenue Revised Sewer Improvement Plans Dear Mr. Bonadiman: December 22, 1999 Enclosed is a revised set of sewer improvement plans for the above referenced project. The revisions to the plans are shown as Delta 1 on Sheet No. 1 and Sheet No. 5. The construction from Sta. No. 86+50.52 (Manhole No. 10) to Sta. No. 94+90 (Manhole No. 14) shall be done as per the revisions shown on. Sheet No. 5. Please contact the undersigned at (909) 350-6645, if any additional information is required. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Engineering Division Yousuf Patanwala, P.E. Associate Civil Engineer/Special Projects cc: City Engineer Principal Civil Engineer/Special Projects Engineering Tech I/Special Projects Public Works Senior Inspector (W/Plans) Public Works Inspector (JC) Michael P. Thornton, Project Manager/L.D. King, Inc. John P. Leuer, LOR Geotechnical Group, Inc. (W/Plans) Joe Defillips, Project SuperintendentlBonadiman-McCain, Inc. (W/Plans) www.fontana.org 8353 SIERRA AVENUE FONTANA, CALIFORNIA 92335-3528 (909) 350-7600 0 recycled paper LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL CITY OF FONTANA CDD/ENGINEERING DIVISION 8353 SIERRA AVENUE FONTANA, CA 92335 TO: Project: Slover Avenue Sewer from Hemlock Avenue to Poplar Avenue Date: August 31, 1999 Metropolitan Water District Mills Filtration Plant 550 E. Alessandro Riverside, CA 92508 ATTN: Charles Polling, Engineering Technician III We are sending you: (X) Attached ( ) Under seperate cover via the following item(s) : ( ) Drawing ( ) Prints (X) Plans ( ) Samples ( ) Specifications ( ) Copy of Letter ( ) Change Order ( ) Check Prints ( ) Studies ( ) Other: SEWER IMPROVEMENT SLOVER AVENUE FROM HEMLOCK AVENUE TO POPLAR AVENUE COPIES DATE. NO. DESCRIPTION 1 SET 08/31/99 DWG.NO. 2767 SHEETS 1 THRU 8 Purpose: (X) For your information/records ( ) For approval ( ) Approved as submitted (X) For your use ( ) Approved as noted (X) As requested ( ) For review and comment ( ) Returned for corrections ( ) Other ( ) ( ) Please ( ) Submit orginal ( ) Resubmit copies for approval ( ) Submit copies for distribution ( ) Return corrected prints ( ) Other For bid due: ,19_ Prints returned after loaned to: Remarks: Copy to: Signed: Date: 08.-31-7` Jeff Bonadiman, Vice President Bonadiman-McCain, Inc. 280 South Lena Road San Bernardino, CA 92412 RE: City of Fontana CALIFORNIA Stover Avenue Sewer from Hemlock Avenue to Poplar Avenue Revised Sewer Improvement Plans Dear Mr. Bonadiman: December 22, 1999 Enclosed is a revised set of sewer improvement plans for the above referenced project. The revisions tcythe plans are shown as Delta 1 on Sheet No. 1 and Sheet No. 5. The construction from Sta. No. 86+50.52 (Manhole No. 10) to Sta. No. 94+90 (Manhole No. 14) shall be done as per the revisions shown on Sheet No. 5. Please contact the undersigned at (909) 350-6645, if any additional information is required. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Engineering Division Yousuf Patanwala, P.E. Associate Civil Engineer/Special Projects cc: City Engineer Principal Civil Engineer/Special Projects Engineering Tech I/Special Projects Public Works Senior Inspector (W/Plans) Public Works Inspector (JC) Michael P. Thornton, Project Manager/L.D. King, Inc. John P. Leuer, LOR Geotechnical Group, Inc. (W/Plans) Joe Defillips, Project Superintendent/Bonadiman-McCain, Inc. (W/Plans) www.fontana.org 8353 SIERRA AVENUE FONTANA, CALIFORNIA 92335-3528 (909) 350-7600 arecycled paper City of Fontana CALIFORNIA Bonadiman-McCain, Inc. Attn: Jeff Bonadiman, Vice President 280 South Lena Road San Bernardino, CA 92412 RE: December 20, 1999 SLOVER AVENUE SEWER FROM HEMLOCK AVENUE TO POPLAR AVENUE Contract Change Order No. 1 Dear Mr. Bonadiman: Enclosed is the original fully executed Contract Change Order No. 1 for your records. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at (909) 350-6646. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. Engine-r'ng Division Gr-.iory J. Bucknell, P.E. P• ncipal Civil Engineer/Special Projects cc: Associate Engineer/Special Projects www.fontana.org 8353 SIERRA AVENUE FONTANA, CALIFORNIA 92335-3528 (909) 350-7600 0 recycled paper CITY OF FONTANA ORIGINAL CONTRACT' JUNT $ 395,239.00 ENGINEERING. DIVISION ESTIMATE OF COST PROJECT:SLOVER AVENUE SEWER from HEMLOCK AVENUE TO POPLAR AVENUE CONTRACTOR: BONADIMAN-MCCAIN, INC. CONTRACT CO NO. 1 SUPP. DATE :December 03, 1999 THIS CCO TOTAL TO DATE CONTRACT ITEM 7,114.24 $7,114.24 FORCE ACCT. AGREED PRICE ADJUSTMENT TOTAL 7,114.24 $7,114.24 % OVER CONTRACT 1.89s 1.80 10% CONTINGENCY BALANCE (INCL.THIS CO) $ 32,409.66 You are hereby directed to make the herein described changes from the plans and specifications or do the following described work not included in the plans and specification on the contract. NOTE: This change order is not effective until approved by the City Engineer. NO. CONTRACT DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT TOTAL ITEM NO. OF WORK PRICE 1. 2 Extra Traffic Control Items LS 1 5997.84 $5,997.84 2. 11 Increase in Asphalt Tonnage 27.91 Ton 40.00 $1,116.40 Estimated Cost Decrease TOTAL = $7,114.24 or Increase $7,114.24 By reason of this order the time of completion will be adjusted as follows: NONE Submitted by: Field Inspector Approval Rec• mended Project Manager Approved: City Engineer Date: ate: Date: /2--/3- 99 /0/t,g/? We, the undersigned contractor, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the word above specified, and will accept as full payment therefor the prices shown above. Accepted, Date 12 / 9 / 9 9 Contractor: BONADIMAN-McCAIN, INC. Title: VICE PRESIDENT 12/99 HF ,DEC-16-1999 13:23 BONADIMAN-MCCAIN 909 889 3706 P.01 BONADIMAN-MICA P 0 BOX 6444, SAN BERNARDINO, ENGINEERS * CONTRACTORS IN, INC. CA 92412 SINCE 1942 PH: (909) 885-3435 FX: (909) 889-3706 LICENSE NO. 74600 A, B, C27 Fax Transmittal TO: Greg Bucknell COMPANY: City of Fontana PHONE: (909) 350-6646 FAX: (909) 350-6618 DATE: December 16,1999 FROM: Penney Paulson Number of Pages including Cover Sheet: 9 REFERENCE: SLOVER AVENUE SEWER FROM HEMLOCK TO POPLAR Greg: See attached substitution request. 4.5 11 F416741,5--e faer (At° I2-e u (ILL Please call (909) 885-3435 if this transmission is not received complete. ,DEC-16-1999 13:23 BONADIMRN-MCCRIN 909 889 3706 P.02 LICENSE NO, 74600 A. 8 8,C 27 INCORPORATED• 1942 TELEPHONE (909) 885-3435 TELECOPIER(909) 889-3706 December 16, 1999 BONAD1 MAN McCain Inc. Engineers rot Contractors Gregory J. 'Bucknell, P.E. City of Fontana Engineering Division 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, CA 92335 REFERENCE: Dear Greg: POST OFFICE BOX 6444 SAN BERNARDINO, CALIF. 92412 OFFICE 290 SOUTH LENA ROAD SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408 YARD 635 TENNIS COURT LANE SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408 VIA FACSIMILE; (909) 350-6618 SLOVER AVENUE SEWER FROM HEMLOCK AVE. TO POPLAR AVE. ci P tot We are request' s authorization to substitute 161 linear feet of 8" Class 250 Ductile Iron Pipe as, specified i • Item 6 on the above referenced project, with 161 linear feet of 8" SDR35 Sewer Pipe, with of concrete encasement at the MWD Waterline. Enclosed are the specifications for the SD 35 Sewer Pipe we are requesting to use. There will be no additional cost to the City of Fontana for this substitution. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Very truly yours, BONADIMAN-McCAIN, INC. Jeff C. Bonadiman Vice President AMERICA PROGRESSES THROUGH CONSTRUCTION 2tatalt 4 (reset ' DEC-16-1999 13:24 BOWMAN-MCCAIN 909 889 3706 P.03 JCY -M PIPE Ring-Tite® PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe and Fittings ' DEC-16-1999 13:24 BONADIMRN—MCCAIN 909 889 3706 P.04 Ring•Tite PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe and Fittings Ring -Tice joint meets egecting tightness requirements, simplifies ssserably "LACIted-in rubber sealing rng povrdes OK flexible • deal; Meets reituiremcrnis of p$TM 0 321 = Joints for i< ;Grain. and Sewer Pipes using;Rexitit"e Elas?amide Seals? Figure I Spigot pipe ends are supplied from factory with bevels. Applications J-M PVC sewer pipe is • suitable for conveying domestic sanitary sewage as well as certainindustrial wastes. For further information regarding the suitability of PVC for conveying various chemicals, contact your J-M pipe representative. 1, Chemical Resistant: J-M Ring -Tile PVC sower Pipe is unaffected by the fluids found in ordnary domestic sewage. It is immune to sewer gases and the sulfuVic acid generated < by the COmpietion of the hydrogen sulI de cycle. it isx. immunkto CorrOSive soh 4 both aDyafne, or acidic. Tf. 2. Abrasion Resistant: r JAM Rrr+g Tite PVC sewer. 711e, bail is an Integra `peit of ``"'pipe has excellent the pipe section with the resistance to abrasion, same Strength, gouging and scoring Meets ASTM D3034-SDR 3s 4"-1 S"end ASTM F679 1B"-27" Introduction The growing demand for an effective all-out attack on water pollution highlights the need for improved sanitary sewage collection systems. A modern system needs pipe with improved design for • reserve strength and stiffness to increase Toad -bearing capacity — all within the • framework of maximizing ' sewer system capacity at reasonable cost. Ring -Tice PVC sewer pipe is designed to meet this need. superior to that of most common piping materials. 3. Flow Characteristics: J-M RingTiite PVC sewer pipe with long lengths, smooth interior, and factory -made clove tolerance joints provides a Manning "n" coefficient of .009. High -carrying capacity makes possible the use of flatter grades or smaller diameter pipe. Ask your J-M sales representative for a flow nomograph and the report "Hydraulic Characteristics of PVC Sewer Pipe in Sanitary Sewers." a joint study by Johns -Manville and Utah State University. Locked -in Ring Through research and technology we proudly offer locked -in' rubber ring PVC sewer pipe. This factory -made joint eliminates the need to insert rings in the field. Joint design and dose manufacturing tolerances allow this joint to pass a 25 feet to head hydrostatic test in the laboratory and provides the basis for exacting intetrationfexfiltratton specifications. Be secure in the future by designing with J-M Ring Tee PVC sewer pipe with low infiltration specify infiltration not to. exceed 50 gallons/inch dipmeterhnile✓day- Call for ASTM 0-3034 SDR35 Provides Greater Eiternal Load -Carrying Capacity_ t: This allows ter the design and construction of PVC gravity sewer systems (4"-15'y consistent with test engineering practices. A uniform minimum "pipe stiffness,' (Ray = 46 psi) means no weak links. It also means that J-M PVC sewer pipe in8,10,12&1S" diameters has 60 to 75 percent greater pipe stiffness than SOR 42 and SDR 41 PVC sewer pipe. This increased "pipe stiffness' provides the extra needed at that critical time when the pipe is first being installed in the trench and undergoing bedding and backtiiL • DEC-16-1.999 13: 25 BONADIMAN-MCCAIN 909 889 3706 P.05 External Loads Background Loads imposed en buried, coeduks have, in past practice. been calculated by using the Marston fo=a formula. For trench loads Marston has a formula for rigirepipe and another formula for flexible pipe. It is important to recognize that under identical conditions of bury the soil load generated on a flexible conduit is Tess than the bad generated on a rigid conduit The . . competitive toad on a rigid conduit verses tite load on a lfexble conduit is expressed as the ratio of trench width to the flexible pipe O*D. By definition. a 11exiible conduit is one which wet deflect before reaching fallure. , Macston's Forrnulos,. For Soil Loads Rigid Pipe W = Ca w Bee=' "` Flexible Pipe We Ca •w Be ea Where: W Load on pipe (IDflin, ft.) Co Load Coefficient w Sal unit weight (11: FN Bd = Ditch width (it) d O.D. of pipe (ft) Prism Load ' Loads imposed on buried conduits have been le calculated by using the Marston load formulas for ,n rigid and flexible pipe. However, it has been determined that Me Marston formula for flexible pipe may not determine the Maximum long term Toad - the "Prism Load" formula is more accurate. The "Prism Load - is the weight of the column of u at sal directly above the pipe. Thus. precautions in keeping 4 the trench narrow are unnecessary for a flexible pipe installation. The Important thing is to compact: the haunching material from the pipe out to the undisturbed trench walls Fi 2 herefore, J•M suggests that ure g _• , the maximum long term Toad 'r: 12 e H2O Highway Load f)elyd kind 120 Woe (N H20 live Ioadt + impac '' S0o`a' tow P„VeAleal Soil Pressure (L.bs/Fir) of Total bad rye dead 1500 be determined by the prism Note: To convert vertical "soil pressure to load on pipe - Toad for design. pouf per `neat foot=multiply by O.D. of'pipe in R Prism Load: P, = veil jlbsl) Where: P,- Pressure at the top of the pipe due to the weight of the soil (lb/ft') w = Soil unit weight — (RA') H . Depth from top of pipe to top of ground (1te Note: To convert prism load (IbJtt,z) to IbJtinear 1L. multiply by the 0. D.. of the pipe in feet. or: W wHB, Live Loads Live loads imposed on buried conduits from traffic must also be considered in a design and become more important at shallow depths. The combination of soli load and live load must be tLive bad apvled on assumed area or 36'x;40', 2000 added together tv design for me maximum load as shown in curves above. The soil load and rive toad must be added to determine the total external load on a buried conduit. This combined bad should be used for design. Figure 2 illustrates the magnitude of soil and live toads separately and also charts the magnitude of the combined or total bads. The curves in figure 2 apply only for H2O highway loading and a soil weight o1120 lbs./cu. ft. At shallow depths of cover —3 feet and less, flexible ,conduits Can deflect and rebound under dynamic loading conditions if the trench width is not sufficiently bridged. Unless special precautions are taken to bridge the trench in shallow installations, the breaking up of flexible road surfaces may result Therefore, for shallow installations under flexible road surfaces (between 1 and 3 feet), J-M recommends CIaee t' material be used in the pipe zone and up to the road elevation. This recommendation is not meant to conflict with the design engineer's specifications and his specifications will govern. "'see page 8 for definition of Class 1. 3 DEC-16-1999 13:25 Pipe Deflection BONRD I MAN—MCCA IN Deflection is defined as the change in vertical inside diameter of a flexible con- duit when subjected to a vertical toad. The amount of deflection that will occur in any flexible conduit is a function of three factors: 1. Pipe Stiffness (F/ Qy) 2. Soil Stiffness 3. load on the pipe I► is important to recognize that flexible conduits per - Corm differently in the ground than they do under laboratory flat plate loading. The interaction 01 pipe stiff- ness and soil stiffness com- bine to give flexible conduits a high effective strength when buried. Methods for Predicting Pipe Deflection The most commonly used f. approach in predicting deflection ha been the modified "Iowa Deflection Formula." -Modl1ied Iowa Formula: _ Di.Kws °y ` El * _061,t' rr a i Wher ,.Ay=„ve: ertica1tdeflei'(on (Inches) . lag .1acror (1.5 maxirnjm)6 K = bedding factor w - earth bad (lb.rin.) r = mean radius (OD —1) (in.) . 2 E = modulus of elasticity (lb./ in?) a moment of inertia 13 i 12 (in.) soil stiffness (ID./in.z) E' Although considered a Con- servative approach, con- siderable variation in predicted deflection will result depending upon the choice of empirical con- stants E', K and D. Empirical methods of predict ring deflection have evolved in recent years which eliminate the guesswork inherent in the Iowa method. 909 889 3706 P.06 When design is based on acNal laboratory test and previous field measurements it is unnecessary to know the actual load acting on the pipe or the soil stiffness. Thus an installation can be designed with a known fac- tor of safety provided enough empirical date iS available, To accommodate the pro- blem of having to establish data for the number of trench widths that are found in the field, the prism toad was chosen because it represents the maximum. loading condition on a flexi- ble pipe. Time tag to account for future settlement of the backlill can be included by choosing long- term values of deflection: -tall has developed- through laboratory tests and 'actual field data the maximum lohg term deflection chart, Figure 3. shown on page T. This chart eliminates the guesswork in predicting deflection and gives the design engineer a quick ready reference. This chart is for PVC SDR 35 Sewer pipe only. The values given for deflection limits are the ultimate long term deflection that will occur in a particular soil class having a given density (compaction) in the haunching area of the pipe zone for various heights of cover (feet). 0 DEC-16-1999 13:26 BONRD I MAN—MCCA IN 909 889 3706 P.07 Use of Maximum Long ,Term Deflection Chart 1. Where five bads are riot a factor or riot involved in the total external toad on the pipe. the chart ciin be used directly to determine the limit of the maximum long-term deflection of the PVC pipe. Example: If an e" PVC SOR 35 Sewer Pipe is installed in Class IV material. having 85% compaction in the pipe zone and with 12 feet of cover, what will be the maximum long term deflection limit? Answer; Pipe will never deflect:more than 5% (color code — dark green). 2 Where five Toads must be considered, determine, first, MO combined IOW external Toad on the pipe.; Next determine the equivalent prism Toad (without We load)` ,tor the:particular pipe size involved using the table of prism bads. Table 1. Read across.to the left for the height of cover (It.) for the equivalent prism load. Using This height o1 cover with the bedding class and proctor density. enter the maximum tong term deflection chart, Figure 3, to determine the maximum long term deflection limit. Example: ll a 12- PVC SOR 35 Sewer Pipe is installed in,Class 1I1 material. having 65% compaction in the pipe zone, with 3 feet of cover and 120 Ibs./tt' soil. and H-200ighway load) live Toad are imposed On the buried pipe, what will be the maximum long term deflection limit? Answer: 1. The combined (dead and live) bad on the pipe will be approximately 1000 Ibsift2 or 1000 x 1 ft. (pipe diameter in feet) - 1000 lbs./lin ft. (per Figure 2). Enter table of prism loads (fable 1) under column 12— Pipe Diameter (Indies) — and read down until nearest figure to 1000 is reached, across from soil wt. of 120 fbsJft.'. In this case. 1000 appears opposite 120 IbsJf13. and 8 ft. — height 01 cover. This represents the equivalent prism load for the combined (dead and rive) load given above. NOw enter maximum long term deflection chart and road the maximum long term deflection color Code for Class HI bedding classification, 65% density, and 8 It. of cover. Dark green — maximum long term dellecton will not exceed 5%- to working with these charts, it becomes apparent that: 1. Soil density in the pipe zone plays a greater role Than soil type in the control of deflection in buried flexible conduits. 2. The amount of deflection is independent of pipesize, providing all pipe sizes are SDR 35. Note pipe size does not appear in the chart for maximum long term deflections. Maximum Long -Term Deflections of PVC (SDR 35) Pipe (Percent) ASTM Bedding ,�;'�ClaSsifrcation :f1Gravel Class DENSITY (Procter) Height of Cover (Feet) AASHO T-99 Glass II 003b 809�' Sand Class 111 90%• e5% 75% Clay Class IV 65% 75% ,• Miir+nra lent' von Oerec cuf 4 rdl Mk *1lC ,$ . o Maurewn:,r Se. C►Oeeto ® vsi tvnir not tQo1otrolA it WHIM IMO AM MEM& -knit 1111111111114 30 : 65' � � R fit#; fa:, Peat Class V This soil class not recommended Figure 3 Note: Deflection values shown do not include effect of live load or longitudinal bending. 1. No length of pipe Installed under conditions specified will deflect mare than is Indicated; the pipe will deflect toss than the amount indcated if specified density is obtained, 2. External loading based upon soil weight of 120 lbs. per cubic foot. 3. Deflections predicted are based upon pipe which was initially circular prior to installation. Actual deflections may differ because Of initial out of roundness caused by storage andfor handhrig. These variations Should be taken into account when measured deflections are compared with those in the table. d. eedding Classifications are as indicated on page 8 and correspond to ASTM D2321. 5. Deflections listed In table are maximum long term values. The suggested maximum long term value is 7.5 percent which is approximately equal to a 5 percent Initial deflection. 6. Initial deflection is deflection taken within the 1st 24 hours after trench is backfitled. 7 /•• DEC-16-1999• 13:27 BONADIMAN-MCCAIN 909 889 3706 P.08 Short Form Specification Scope This specification designates general requirements for unPlasticized polyvinyl chlorine (PVC) Plastic Gravity Sewer Pipe with integral wall belt and spigot joints for lie conveyance of domestic sewage. Materials Pipe and fittings shall meet the requirements of ASTM Specification 03034 for d"-15•" SDR 35 and F679 for 18`-274. The pipe shall be ceiored green for in -ground ::identification as sewer pipe., :"rPipe Pipe shall be suitable for use as a gravity sewer conduit. Provisions.mustbe 'made for contraction and expansion at each joins With,. a rubber ring, The bell shall consist of an integral wall section with a solid cross; section rubber ring, factory assembled. securely locked in place to prevent displacement during assernbty. Saes and dimensions shall be as shown in this specification. Standard laying lengths shall be 20 ft. and 13 ft 11 inch. At manufacturers option, random lengths of not more than 15% of total footage of each size may be Ahmed .in 6eu of standard lengths. Drop Impact Test Pipe (6' long section) shall be subjected to impact from a free ►alling 1up (20-Ih. bp A.) in accordance with ASTM Method of Test 024d4. No shattering or Splitting (denting is not a failure) snarl be evident when the fallowing energy is impat:led- Norninal Size Inches Ft •I.bs 4 6 e.. 10 12 15 le 21 24 27 Fittings All fittings and accessories., . shalt be as manufactured and furnished by the pipe supplier or approved equal and have bell and/or spigot configurations compatible with that of the pipe. Temperature for Testing Pipe shall be designed to pass all tests at 73°F (=3°F). Pipe Stiffness Minimum "piDe Stiffness' (Fla y) at 5% deflection Shall be 45 psi for ail Sizes when testeo in accordance ' with ASTM Method of Test 02412, 'External Loading Properties of Plastic Pipe by Parallel -Plate Loading.' ISO 210 210 220 220 220 220 220 220 220 Joint Tightness Two sections of pipe shalt be assembled in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendation. Join! shall be tested in accordance wron ASTM D32t 2, "Joints for Drain and Sewer Plastic Pipe Using Flexible Elastomenc Seals.' Flattening There shall be no evidence of splitting. cracking, or breaking when the pipe Is tested as follows' Flatten specimen of pipe, six inches long between parallel plates in a suitable press:. until ttte distance between the plates is forty percentof the outside diameter of the pipe, The rate of loading' shall be uniform andsuch' that tttd co"rnpression is completed with,* twb`tp:.five minutes - Gaskets Materiel used for elastomeric seal in push - on joints shall meet file requirements of ASTM SpecdieaVon F 477. Installation Product should be installed in accordance with J-M Publication TR-6148, "Green -Tile" PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe Installation Guide." 10 DEC-16-1999 13:27 BONADIMAN—MCCAIN 909 889 3706 P.09 !' Sizes, Dimensions and Weights Be1I and Spigot Assembly (Inches) Pipe Pipe Oetalls Size Average Min. wail Inches O.D. Thickness "T. '4 4.215 0.120 8 6.275 0.180 8 8.400 0.240 10 10,500 tit 0.304 12 . 12.500 0.360 :1 5 • 16.300 ,` 0.437 18 18.701 0.536 21 220471 . 0.632 Pipe Size inches 24"! 24.803 0,T 11 27". 27.953 0.801 Min- Wall Ave. 0.11 Thiekneaa • Sell Details Approx. Approx. Weight D5 ` D8 09 . N Lbs.1Ft. 4.250 4.240„ 520 2.90 1.05 6.318 8.308 .,. 7150 3.50 2,36 8.460 8.440_.. 10;10 4.10 4.24 10.570 10_548 1240 4.70 6.64 12.577 12.554. 1450 5.15 9.50 15.380 15.352' 18:30 5.40 14.14 18.764 18.764 ' 21:98 5.90 21.43 22.110 •221'10 25,63 640 29.8E • Approx. Approx. Wt. 05 08 D9 N .`�Lbs /FL 25.04 . 24.99 28.80 11.25 38.96 28.72 28.17 32.50 12.75 49.47 11 TIITAI P_ m '',DEC-16-1999 13:23 BONAD I MAN-MCCA I N 909 889 3706 P.01 BONADIMAN-MCCAIN, INC. P 0 BOX 6444, SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92412 ENGINEERS * CONTRACTORS SINCE 1942 PH: (909) 885 3435 FX: (909) 889-3706 LICENSE NO. 74600 A, B, C27 Fax Transmittal TO: . Greg Bucknell COMPANY: City of Fontana PHONE: (909) 350-6646 FAX: (909) 350-6618 DATE: December 16,1999 FROM: Penney Paulson Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 9 REFERENCE: SLOVER AVENUE SEWER FROM HEMLOCK TO POPLAR Greg: See attached substitution request. Please call (909) 885-3435 if this transmission is not received complete .DEC-16-1999 13:23 BONADIMRN-MCCAIN 909 889 3706 P.02 LICENSE NO, 74800 A, B 8,0 27 INCORPORATED" 1942 TELEPHONE (909) 885-3435 TELECOPIER{909) 889-3706 BONADIMAN McCain Inc. Engineers *Contractors POST OFFICE BOX 6444 SAN BERNARDINO, CALIF. 92412 December 16, 1999 Gregory J. Bucknell, P.E. City of Fontana Engineering Division 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, CA 92335 OFFICE 280 SOUTH LENA ROAD SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408 YARD 635 TENNIS COURT LANE SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408 VIA FACSIMILE; (909) 350-6618 REFERENCE: SLOVER AVENUE SEWER FROM HEMLOCK AVE. TO POPLAR AVE. cd6 4)i--"A• c-k e- ettc 02-5 4Wi-j k.1.3 We are' request" • authorization to substitute 161 linear feet of 8" Class 250 Ductile Iron Pipe as, specified i • tem 6 on the above referenced project, with 161 'linear feet of 8" SDR35 Sewer Pipe with of concrete;; encasement at the MWD Waterline. Enclosed are the specifications'' for the SD 35 Sewer Pipe we are requesting to use. There will be no additional cost to the City Dear Greg: of Fontana for this substitution. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Very truly yours, BONADIMAN-McCAIN, INC. Jeff C. Bonadiman Vice President AMERICA PROGRESSES THROUGH CONSTRUCTION erifeatelet4 eAutotaet DEC-16-1999 13:24 BONADIMAN-MCCAIN 909 889 3706 R.03 J-M PIPE Ring-Tite® PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe and Fittings DEC-16-1999 13:24 BONAD I MAN-MCCA I N 909 889 3706 P.04 Ring:rite PVC Giravity Sewer Pipe and Fittings Fling -Tile joint meets erecting tightness requirements, simplifies assembly -'Locked-in" rubber sealing ring provides ii ht, flexible • seal. Meets re uirements of 3ASTM 03212` -.Joints for Drain and Sewer.. Pipes using'• FlexibleElastomeric Seals." Figure t Spigot pipe ends are supplied from factory with bevels. The. bell is an integral part of the pipe section with the same strength. Meets ASTM • D3034-SDR 35 4"-15"and ASTM F679 1 B"-27" Introduction The growing demand for an effective all-out attack on water pollution highlights Inc neon for improved sanitary sewage coftection systems. A modern system needs pipe with improved design for • reserve strength and stiffness to increase load -bearing capacity - all within the framework of maximizing sewer system capacity at reasonable cost. Ring•Tite PVC sewer pipe is designed to meet this need. 1 Applications J-M PVC sewer pipe is • suitable for conveying domestic sanitary sewage as well as certainindustrial wastes. For further information regarding the suitability of PVC for conveying various chemicals, contact your J-M pipe representative. 1. Chemical Resistant: J-M RingTite PVC Sewer pipe iS unaffected by the fluids found in ordinary domestic sewage. It is immune to sewer gases and Vie sutfi/nc acid generated by the Completion of the hydrogen suede cycle. It is immuneno corrosive soils - both aUizafine or acidic. 2.,abrasion Resistant: `Jtta RI!?9 Tite PVC sewer pipe has excellent resistance to abrasion, gouging and scoring — superior to that of most common piping materials. 3. Flow Characteristics: J•M Ring Tile PVC sewer pipe with long lengths, smooth interior, and factory -made close tolerance joints provides a Manning "n" coefficient of .009. High -carrying capacity makes possible the use of flatter grades or smaller diameter pipe. Ask your J-M sales representative for a flow nomograph and the report "Hydraulic Characteristics of PVC Sewer Pipe in Sanitary Sewers;'. a joint study by Johns -Manville and Utah State University. Locked -In Ring Through research and technology we proudly offer "ticked -in" rubber ring PVC sewer pipe. This factory -made joint eliminates the need to insert rings in the field. Joint design and close manufacturing tolerances allow this joint to pass a 25 feet to head hydrostatic test in the laboratory and provides the basis for exacting infiltration/ex-filtration specifications. Be secure in the future by designing with J-M Ring•Tite PVC sewer pipe with low,infiltration - specify infiltration net to exceed 50 galtonsrnch diameter/mile/day_ Call for ASTM 0-3034 SDR35 Provides Greater External Load -Carrying Capacity. This allows f,r the design and construction of PVC gravity sewer systems (4"-15") consistent with best engineering practices. A uniform minimum 'pipe stiffness," (F/Ay = 46 psi) means no weak finks. It also means that J-M PVC sewer pipe in 8, 10, 12 & 1S" diameters has 60 to 75 percent greater pipe stiffness than SOFT 4? and SDR 41 PVC sever pipe. This increased' pipe stiffness' provides Vie extra needed at thatcriticaltime when the pipe is first being installed in the trench and undergoing bedding and backtlll. DEC-16-1999 13:25 BONAD IMAN-MCCA I N 909 889 3706 P.05 External Loads Background Leads imposed on buried. conduits have, in past practice. been calculated by using the Marston Toad formula. For trench bads Marston has a formula for rigid:pipe anti another formula for flexible pipe. It is important to recognize that under identieal conditions of bury the soil Toad generated on a flexible conduit is less than lhe,load generated on a rigid conduit. The comparitive load on a rigid conduit verses the load an a flexible conduit is expressed as the ratio of trench width. to the flexible pipe O:D. By definition. a flexible conduit is one which .wlit deflect before reaching failure. Marston's Formulas For Soil Loads: Rigid Pipe W - Ca w ga2 Flexible Pipe W = Ca w 8,8, Where: W = Load on pipe (Ibitiri. ft.) ' Ce= load Coefficient w Boil unit weight (1t fFN Bo Ditch width (IL) 6y s O.D. of pipe (ft) Prism Load ' Loads imposed on buried conduits have been calculated by using the Marston Toad formulas for rigid and flexible pipe. However, it has been determined that the Marston formula for flexible pipe may not determine the maximum long term Toad - the "Prism Load" formula is more accurate. The "Prism Load - is the weight of the column of soil directly above the plpe. Thus, precautions in keeping the trench narrow are unnecessary for a flexible pipe installation. The Important thing is to compact the haunching material from the pipe out to the; undisturbed trench walls. Therefore, J•M suggests that the maximum long term Toad be determined by the prism load for design..; Prism Load: P, = wH (lbs/ft2) Where: P .. Pressure at the top of the pipe due to the weight of the soli (Ib/ft2) w = Soli unit weight-- (Ib/ft') H . Depth from top of pipe to top of ground (ft.) Note: To convert prism load (Ib./tt,z) to lb./linear tt_ multiply by the 0. D.. of the pipe in feet. on W wH6, Live Loads Live loads imposed on buried conduits from traffic must also be Considered in a design and become more important at shallow depths. The combination of soll load and live load must be H2O Highway Load t6 1a i2 Height of Cover (Feel) IQ Dried road i2u1b./cu.11. H2O live load t + impac 500 t000 Py'Vertieal soil pressyry (bs/Fix) Total load rive + dead 1500 Figure 2 Note: To convert vertical soil pressure to load on pipe_-- " pounds per;lineal foot -multiply by O.D. epipe in ft. tLive load applied on assumed area of 36- x 40". zo00 added together Iv design for the maximum load as shown in curves above. The soil load and live load must be added to determine the total external lead on a buried conduit. This combined bad should be used for design. Figure 2 Illustrates the magnitude of sal and live loads separately and also charts the magnitude of the combined or total bads. The curves in figure 2 apply only for H2O highway loading and a soil weight of 120 lbs./cu. ft. At shallow depths of cover — 3 feet and less, flexible conduits can deflect and rebound under dynamic loading conditions 11 the trench width is not sufficiently bridged. Unless special precautions•are taken to bridge the trench in shallow installations, tee breaking up of flexible road surfaces may result Therefore, for shallow installations under flexible road surfaces (between 1 and 3 feet), J-M recommends Classy material be used in the pipe zone and up to the road elevation, This recommendation is not meant to conflict with the design engineer's specifications and his specifications will govern. 'see page 8 for definition of Class 1. 3 DEC-16-1999 13:25 Pipe Deflection BONADIMAN—MCCAIN 909 889 3706 P.06 Deflection is defined as the change in vertical inside diameter of a flexible con- duit when subjected to a vertical load. The amount of deflection that will occur in any flexible conduit is a function of three teeters: 1. Pipe Stiffness (F/ y) 2. Soil Stiffness 3, Load on the pipe II is important to recognize that flexible conduits per- form differently in the ground than they dO under laboratory flat plate loading. The interaction Of pipe stiff- ness and soil stiffness com- bine to give flexible conduits a high effective strength when buried. Methods for Predicting Pipe Deflection The most commonly uses approach in predicting deflection has been the modified "Iowa Deflection Formula.;' Modified Iowa Formula: DLKwr' ay - El r-061;t0 Where: Ay =fvertical defle .(ion • (Inches) • . lag lector (1.5 maximum), K _ bedding lacier w = earth bad (Ib.rin.) r = mean radius (OD —1 ) (in.) `• 2 E = modulus of elasticity (Ib. / in?) e moment of inertia 13i 12 (in.?) E' = soil stiffness (Ib./in.z) Although considered a con- servative approach, con- siderable variation in predicted deflection will result depending upon the choice of empirical con- stants E. K and D.. Empirical methods of predic- ting deflection have evolved in recent years which eliminate the guesswork inherent in the Iowa method. When design is based on actual Laboratory test and previous field measurements it ie unnecessary to know the actual load acting on the pipe or the soil stiffness. Thus an installation can be designed with a known fac- tor of safety provided enough empirical data is available. To accommodate the pro- blem of having to establish data for the number of trench widths that are found in the field. the prism load was chosen because it represents the: maximum Wading .condition on a flexi- ble pipe. Time lag to account for future settlement of the backfill can be included by choosing long- term values of deflection. •J-AA has developed through laboratory tests and actual field data the maximum long term deflection chart, Figure 3, shown on page 7. This chart 'eliminates the guesswork in predicting deflection and gives the design engineer a quick ready reference. This chart is for PVC SOB 35 Sewer pipe only. The values given for deflection limits are the ultimate long term deflection that will occur in a particular soil class having a given density (compaction) in the haunching area of the pipe zone for various heights of cover (feet). IA DEC-16-1999 13:26 BONAD I MAN—MCCA I N 909 889 3706 P.07 r Use of Maximum Long 'Term Deflection Chart 1. Where live loads are not a factor or not involved in the total external load on the pipe. the chart can be used directly to determine the limit of The maximum longterm deflection of The PVC pipe. Example: If an 8" PVC SDR 35 Sewer Pipe is installed in Clais IV material, having 85% compaction in the pipe zone and with 12 feet of cover. what will be the maximum tong term deflection limit? Answer: Pipe will never deflect more than 5% (color code — dark green). 2. Where live Toads must be considered, determine, first, me combined total external Toad on the pipe. Next determine the equivalent Prism lbad'(rvithevt live bad) • tor the:particutar pipe size involved using the table of . prism loads, Table 1. Read acroseto the left for the height of cover (ft) for the equivalent prism Toad_ Using this height of cover with the bedding class and proctor density, enter the maximum tong term deflection chart. Figure 3, to determine the maximum long term deflection limit. Example: It a 12- PVC SOP 35 Sewer Pipe is installed tn•Class 111 material. having 65% compaction in the pipe zone, with 3 feet of cover and 1201bsJtt' soil. and H-20,(highway toad) live load are imposed on the buried pipe, what will be the maximum long term deflection limit? Answer: 1. The combined (dead and rive) load on the pipe will be approximately 1000 Ibsfftt or 1000 x 1 ft. (pipe diameter in feet) 1000 tbs./lin ft, (per Figure 2). Enter table of prism loads (Table 1) under column 12 — Pipe Diameter (Inches) — and read down until nearest figure to 1000 is reached, across from soil wt, of 120 ibsift.3. In this case, 1000 appears opposite 120 IbsJH 3. and 81t. — height or cover. This represents the equivalent prism Toad tor the combined (dead and five) Ioat given above. Now enter maximum long term deflection chair and read the maximum long term deflection color code for Class III bedding classification, 65% density, and 81t. of cover, Dark green — maximum tong term dellection will not exceed 5%. In working wish these charts, it becomes apparent that; 1. Soil density in the pipe zone plays a greater role lean soil Type in the control of deflection in buried flexible conduits. 2. The amount of deflection is independent of pipe.size, providing all pipe sizes are SCR 35. Note pipe size does not appear in the chart for maximum long term deflections. Maximum Lorrg•Term Deflections of PVC (SDR 35) Pipe (Percent) ASTM Bedding Classification "1-99 3 Gravel Class I DENSITY • (Proctor) Height of Cover (Feet) AASHO Class II 9o% SO% Sand Class 111 90% 854% 75% 65% Clay Class IV 85% 75% 65% 5 8 10 12 14 16 18 Peat Class V This soil class not recommendeo 20 22 '2 26 28 30 .m> Figure 3 Note: Deflection values shown do not include effect of five load or longitudinal bending. 1. No length of pipe Installed under conditions specified will deflect mare than is indicated; the pipe will deflect less than the amount indicated if specked density is obtained. 2. External loading based upon soil weight of 1201bs. per cubic foot. 3a Deflections predicted are based upon pipe which was initially circular prior to installation. Actual deflections may differ because of initial out of roundness caused by storage and/or handling. These variations Should be taken into account when measured deflections are compared with those in the table. • 4, Bedding classifications are as indicated on page 8 and correspond to ASTM 02321. 5. Deflections listed In table are maximum long term values. The suggested maximum long term value is 7.5 percent which is approximately equal to a 5 percent initial deflection. 6. Initial deflection is deflection taken within the 1St 24 hours after trench is bactditled. T DEC-16-1999 13:27 BONADIMAN—MCCAIN 909 889 3706 P.08 Short Form Specification Scope This specification designates general requirements for unplasticized polyvinyl chloride (PVC) Plastic Gravity Sewer Pipe with Integra/ wall belt and spigot jointsforale conveyance of domestic sewage. Materiels Pipe and fittings shalt meet the requirements of ASTM Specification D3034 for 4"-15•" SDR 35 and F579 for 18'•27". The pipe shall be colored ,green for in -ground identification as sewer pipe. • Pipe Pipe arias be suitable for use as a gravity sewer cOnduit..ProvisiOrnS must be made for contraction and; expansion at each joint with a rubber ring, The Dell shall conslit of an integral wall Section wilh a solid cross; section rubber ring. factory assembled. securely looked in place to prevent displacement during assembly. Saes and dimensions shall be as Shown in this specification. Standard laying lengths shall be 20 tt. and 13 It t1 inch. At manufacturer's option, random lengths of not more than 15Y. of total footage of each size may be shipped•in Geu of standard lengths. • • Drop Impact Test Pipe (6" long section) shall be subjected to impact from a free ►ailing 1uo (20-lb. Tup A.) in accordance with ASTM Method of Test D2444• No shattering or splitting (denting is not a failure) shall be evident when the following energy is impacted' Nominal Size. Inches Ft .Lbs a 6 8 10 12 15 to 21 24 27 150 210 210 220 220 220 220 220 220 220 Fittings All fittings and accessories shalt be as manufactured and furnished by the pipe supplier or approved equal and have bell and/or spigot configurations compatible with that of the pipe. Temperature for Testing Pipe shall be designed to pass all tests at 73°F (a3"F)• Pipe Stiffness Minimum "pipe Stiffness" (FFA y) at 5% deflection snail be 45 psi for all sizes when tested in accordance with ASTM Method of Test D2412. 'External Loading Properties of Plastic Pipe by Parallel -Plate Loading.' Joint Tightness Two sections of pipe shalt be assembled in accordance wilh the manufacturers , recommendation. Joins shell De tested in accordance wro+ ASTM D3212, 'Joints for Drain and Sewer Plastic Pipe Using Flexible Elastomeric Seals." Flattening There shall be no evidence of splitting, cracking, or breaking when the pipe is tested as follows' Flatten specimen of pipe, six inches bng between parallel plates in p suitable press •_ unfit the distance between the plates is forty pereent'of the outside diameter of the pipe. The rate of loading?!; shall be uniform and such' that trio co`i'npression is completed within two tQ'five minutes. Gaskets Materiel used tor elastomeric seal in push. on joints shall meet the requirements of ASTM Spec+ficaGon P 477. Installation Product should be installed in accordance with J•M Publication TR-6148, "Green•Tite' PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe Installation Guide" 10 DEC-16-1999 13:27 BONADIMAN-MCCAIN 909 889 3706 P.09 Sizes, Dimensions and Weights Hell and Spigot Assembly (Inches) Pipe Pipe Details Size' Average Min. Wall Inches O.D. Thickness "T'' ' 4 4.215 0.120 6 8.275 0.180 6 8.400 0.240 10 10.500 o.3,0p 12 , 12.500 0.360 15' 16.300 : 0.437 18 18.701 0.536 21 22.047 0.632; Pipe Size Min. Wall Inches Ave. 0.D. Thickness "T'' 2a 24.803 0,711 - - - _ _ 27". 27.953 0.801 Bell Details Approx. Approx. Weight D5 D8 , D5 ' N L_bs.JFt. 4.250 4.240 520 2.90 1.05 6.318 8,308 750 3.50 2.36 8.460 8.440 10.10 4.10 4.24 10.570 10.54E • 1240 4.70 6.64 12.577 12.554 14i50 ;:'; 5,15 9.50 15.380 15.362 1'800 5.40 14.14 18.764 18.764 21:98 5.90 21.43 22.110 22.110 25.63 6.40 29.88 Approx, Approx. Wt. 05 DB D5 N Lbs./Ft. 25.04 24.99 28.80 ' ' 11.25 38.98 .- 28.72 28.17 32.50 12.75 49.47 11 TOTAL P.09 ,DEC-16-1999 13:23 BONADIMAN-MCCAIN 909 889 3706 P.01 B ONAD. IMAN-Mc CAIN, INC. PH: (909) 885-3435 P 0 BOX .6444, SAN B,ERNARDINO, CA 92412 FX: (909) 889-3706 ENGINEERS * CONTRACTORS SINCE 1942 LICENSE NO. 74600 A, B, C27 Fax Transmittal TO: Greg Bucknell COMPANY: City of Fontana DATE: December 16,1999 PHONE: (909) 350-6646 FROM: penney Paulson FAX: (909) 350-6618 Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 9 REFERENCE: SLOVER AVENUE SEWER FROM HEMLOCK TO POPLAR Greg: See attached substitution request. �+- S i20 4Lid Please call (909) 885-3435 if this transmission is not received complete. ,DEC-16-1999 13:23 BONAD I MAN-MCCA IN 909 889 3706 P.02 Dear Greg: LICENSE NO. 74500A,B&C27 INCORPORATED 1942 TELEPHONE (909) 885-3435 TELECOPIER(909) 889-3706 BONADIMAN McCain Inc. Engineers (4) Contractors POST OFFICE 80X 6444 SAN BERNARDINO, CALIF. 92412 December 16, 1999 Gregory J. Bucknell, P.E. City of Fontana Engineering Division 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, CA 92335 0 FICE 260 SOUTH LENA ROAD SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408 YARD 635 TENNIS COURT LANE SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408 VIA FACSIMILE; (909) 350-6618 REFERENCE: SLOVER AVENUE SEWER FROM HEMLOCK AVE. TO POPLAR AVE. r We are' request' . authorization to substitute 161 linear feet of 8" Class 250 Ductile Iron Pipe as. specified i • tem 6 on the above referenced project, with 161 linear feet of 8" SDR35 Sewer , Pipe with of concrete encasement at the MWD Waterline. :Enclosed are the specifications for the SD 35 Sewer Pipe we are requesting to use. There will be no additional cost to the City of Fontana for this substitution. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Very truly yours, BONADIMAN-McCAIN, INC. Jeff C. Bonadiman Vice President AMERICA PROGRESSES THROUGH CONSTRUCT/ON gilt &owe DEC-16-1999 13:24 BONADIMAN-MCCAIN 909 889 3706 P,.03 J-M PIPE Ring•Tite® PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe and Fittings DEC-16-1999 13:24 BONRD I MAN—MCCA IN 909 889 3706 P.04 Ring•Tite PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe and Fittings Ring-Tte joint meets exacting tightness r purrements, simplifies assembly Spigot pipe ends are supplied from factory wen -Loeketa- n' r.ybber sealing ,levels. ring provides V'ght, flexible • peal. Meets requirements 01 - eSTM D-3212 _ 'Joints for g ,Vrain,and Sewer Pipes using;Fiexide Elastomeric Seals? " s;.i The. bell is an'• ntegral"part of the pipe section with the same strength. Figure Meets ASTM D3034-SDR 35 4"-15' Vend ASTM F879 1B"-27" Introduction The growing demand loran effective all-out attack on water pollution highlights the need for improved sanitary sewage collection systems. A modem system needs pipe With improved design for • reserve strength and stiffness to increase load -bearing rapacity — all within the framework of maximizing sewer system capacity at reasonable cost. Ring -rite PVC sewer piDe is designed to meet this need. 2 Applications J-M PVC sewer pipe is • suitable for conveying domestic sanitary sewage as well as certainindustrial wastes. For further information regarding the suitability of PVC for conveying various chemicals, contact your J-M pipe representative. 1. Chemical Resistant: J-M Ring -rite PVC sower pipe is unaffected by the fluids found in ordinary oorr estic sewage. It is • immune >o sewer gases and the svltuic acid generated;- by the completion of the d, hydrogen sulfide cycle. It is immuneto corrosive soils + ' both alkesnu or acidic. f Z. Abrasion Resistant: JAM flfpg Tit, PVC sever pipe has excellent resistance to abrasion, gouging and scoring superior 10 that of most common piping materials. 3. Flow Characteristics: J.M Ring -Tile PVC sewer pipe with long lengths, smooth interior, and factory -made close tolerance joints provides a Manning "n" coefficient of .009. High -carrying capacity makes possible the use of flatter grades or smatter diameter pipe. Ask your J-M sales representative for a How nomograph and the report "Hydraulic Characteristics of PVC Sewer Pipe in Sanitary Sewers,' a joint study by Johns -Manville and Utah State University. Locked -in Ring Through research and technology we proudly offer "locked -in" rubber ring PVC sewer pipe. This factory -made joint eliminates the need to insert rings in the field. Joint design and dose manufacturing tolerances allow this joint to pass a 25 feet to head hydrostatic test in the laboratory and provides the basis for exacting intm,aton/exfiltratton specifications. Be secure in the future by designing with J-M Rine Tite PVC sewer pipe with low infiltration - specify inbltredon net to exceed 50 gallons/inch diemetettrnile/day_ Gall forASTM D-3034 SDR35;, Provides Greeter.External . •. Load -Carrying Capacity. • • This nporvstvr ti?a design • and construction of PVG gravity sewer systems (4"-15') consistent with best engineering practices. A uniform minimum "pipe stiffness," (FIt y = 46 psi) means no weak links. It also means that J-M PVC sewer pipe in8,10,12&IS" diameters has 60 to 75 percent greater pipe stiffness than SCR. 42 and SDR 41 PVC sewer pipe, This increased "pipe stiffness' provides Me extra needed at that critical time when the pipe is first being installed in the trench and undergoing bedding and backtilL DEC-16-1999 13: 25 BONADIMtaN-MCCAIN 909 889 3706 P.05 External Loads Background Loads imposed On buried. cordufts have, in past Practice. been calculated by using the Marston load formula For trench loads Marston has a formula for rigidlpipe end another formula for flexible pipe. It is important to recognize that under identiCal conditions of bury the soil load generated on a flexible conduit is less than the Toad generated on a rigid conduit The comparitive toad on a rigid suit verses the load on a liex►bte conduit is expressed as The ratio of trench width to the double pipe O.D. By definition. a flexible conduit is one which win deflect before reaching failure. :Macston's Formulas. 'For Soil Loads Rigid Pipe W-= Cow gaz Flexible Pipe W = CQ .w 9� i3a Where: W = Load on pipe ' (Ib/lirr, ft.) Cep Load Coefficient w Sail unit weight (tiro Bd . Ditch width (It) 9r s O.D. of pipe (ft) • Prism Load ' Loads imposed on buried conduits have been calculated by using the Marston load formulas for rigid and flexible pipe. However. it teas been determined that the Marston formula for flexible pipe may not determine the maximum long term Toad - the "Prism Load" formula is more accurate. The "Prism Load - is the weight of the column of soil directly above the pipe. Thus. precautions in keeping the trench narrow are unnecessary for a flexible pipe installaticm . The !important thing is to compact the haunching material from the pipe out do the ',Undisturbed trench walls. ".Therefore. J•Msuggests that ,the maximum tong term Toad `be determined by the prism load for design. Prism Load: P, = wH (Ibs/ft2) Where: P,- Pressure at the top of the pipe due to the weight of the soil (lb/ft') w = Soli unit weight-- (lWn') H s Depth from top of pipe to top of ground Note: To convert prism load (lb./tt,z) to lb./linear ft. multiply by the O.D.. of the pipe in feet. or: w wHB, Live Loads Live loads imposed on buried conduits from traffic muss also be considered in a design and become more important at shallow depths. The combination of soli Toad and live load must be H2O Highway Load t6 Height of Cover (Feel) 12 10 e 6 4 Figure 2 field load 12O lb./ce.11.\ H2O live leadt + inipac Total toad five + dead 500'•!' 1000 P„ tartleal Soil pi:Sat re (Lbs/FIT) ' 514 Note: To ccrrvert vertical 'Soil pressure to load on pipe-- pounds,per;`rieat foot —multiply by,O.D. of•ptpe in ft.' ttive`load deified on assumed area of 36'x,40'.,: 1500 2000 added together to design for the maximum Toad as shown in curves above. The soil bad and five load must be added to determine the total external Toad on a buried conduit This combined bad should be used for design. Figure 2 illustrates the magnitude of sal and five loads separately and also charts the magnitude of the combined or total loads. The curves in !inure Z apply only for H2O highway loading and a soil weight of 120 Ibs./cu. ft. At shallow depths of cover —3 feet and less. flexible conduits Can deflect and rebound under dynamic loading conditions if the trench width is not sufficiently bridged. Unless special precaulens•are taken to bridge the trench in shallow installations, the breaking up of flexible road surfaces may result Therefore, for shallow installations under flexible road surfaces (between 1 and 3 feet), J-M recommends Class 1' material be used in the pipe zone and up to the road elevation. This recommendation is not meant to conflict with the design engineer's specifications and his specifications will govern. "see page 8 for definition of Class 1. 3 DEC-16-1999 13:25 BONADIMAN—MCCAIN 909 889 3706 P.06 Pipe Deflection Deflection is defined as the change in vertical inside diameter of a flexible con- duit when subjected t0 3 vertical toad. The amount of deflection that will occur in any flexible conduit is a function of Wee feelers: 1. Pipe Stiffness (Flay) 2. Soil Stiffness 3. Load on the pipe II is important to recognize that flexible conduits per- form differently in the ground than they do under laboratory flat plate loading. The interaction of pipe stiff- ness and soil stiffness com- bine to give flexible conduits a high effective strength when burled. Methods for Predicting Pipe Deflection The mist commonly used approach in predicting deflection has been the modified "Iowa Deflection Formula." Modified Iowa Formtjla: Ay ` K El r -061` Where: fE 8y =4verticat'de►Ie4iton '(Inches)• n ; D, -;.1ag factor .. (1.5 maximum) K bedding factor w = earth bad (1b.rin.) r = mean radius (0D' 1) (in.) N. 2 E = modulus of elasticity (Ib. / in?) moment of inertia t3i12(iA)) = soil stiffness (ID./in.z) E' Although considered a con- servative approach, con- siderable variation in predicted deflection will result depending upon the choice Of empirical con- stants E'. K and D. Empirical methods o1 predic- ting deflection have evolved in recent years which eliminate the guesswork inherent in the Iowa method. When design is based on actual laboratory test and previous field measurements it is unnecessary to know the actual load acting on the pipe or the 30i1 stiffness. Thus an installation can be designed with a known fac- tor of safety provided enough empirical date is available. To accommodate the pro- blem of having to establish data for the number of trench widths that are found in the field, me prism load was chosen because it representsthe maximum' loading iceedition on a flexi- ble pipe. Tithe tag to account for: future settlement of the backlill can be included ty choosing long- term values Of deflection. ,l-M hasdexeloped through laboratory: tests„and actual field data the maximum long term deflection chart, Figure 3. shown on page 7. This chart 'eliminates the guesswork in predicting defection and gives the design engineer a quick ready reference. This chart i5 for PVC SDR 35 Sewer pipe only. The values given for deflection limits are the ultimate long term deflection that will occur in a particular soil class having a given density (compaction) in the haunching area of the pipe zone for various hei9hte of cover (feet). 0 DEC-16-1999 13:26 BONAD I MAN—MCCA IN 909 889 3706 P. 07 Use of Maximum Long Term Deflection Chart T. Where live toads are not a factor or not involved in the total external road on the pipe. the chart can be used directly to determine the limit of the maximum tong -term deflection of the PVC pipe. Example: If an 8" PVC SDR 35 Sewer Pipe is installed in Class IV material, having 85% compaction in the pipe zone and with 12 feet of cover. what will be the maximum !Ong term deflection limit? Answer; Pipe will never deflect:more than 5% (color Vide - dark green). 2. Where live Toads must be Considered, determine, first, the combined total external Toad on the pipe.. Next determine the equivalent prism road (without live :triad) tor the:particular pipe site involved using the table of prism loads, TBbie 1. Read acrosseto the left for the height of cover (ft.) for the equiviilent prism toad. Using this height of cover with the bedding class and proctor clonally, enter the maximum tong term deflection chart, Figure 3, to determine the maxiinum long term deflection limit. Example: 11 a 12" PVC SDR 35 Sewer Pipe is installed in.Class 111 material. having 65.e. compaction in the pipe zone, with 3 feet of cover and 120 IbsJtt' soil. and H-20,(highway Toad) live load are imposed on the buried pipe, what will be the maximum long term deflection limit? Answer: 1. The combined (dead and live) load on the pipe will be approximately 1000 IbsJftt or 1000 x 1 It. (pipe diameter in feet) 1000 lbs./lin ft. (per Figure 2). Enter table of prism Toads (cable 1) under column 12— Pipe Diameter. (Inches) — and read down until nearest figure to 1000 is reached, across from soil wt. of 120 ibs.itt.'. In this vase, 1000 appears opposite 120 IbsJft?. and 8 ft.— height of cover. This represents the equivalent prism toad for the combined (dead and five) load given above. Now enter maximum long term deflection chart and read the maximum long term deflection color code for Class III bedding classification, 65% density, and 8 ft. of cover. Dark green — maximum tong term deflection will not exceed 5%. in working with these charts, it becomes apparent that. 1. Soil density in the pipe zone plays a greater role Irian soil type in the control of deflection in buried flexible conduits. 2. The amount of deflection is independent or pipesize, providing all pipe sizes are SDR 35. Note pipe size does not appear in the chart for maximum long term deflections. Maximum Long-term Deflections of PVC (SDR 35) Pipe (Percent) DENSITY • ' 'ASTM ' `' (Praetor) Height of Cover (Feet) TBedding :. AASHO .;Clas5ifrcatiort T-99 Gravel Class t' class i l 90% eo% Sand Class flt 90%- `. 85% 75% 65% Clay Class IV 85% 75% lEICILIMEEIMEICEM1211313 659'4 Muxntm lony►NM Weapon will AO Well S•• 0 MotKnurn,7;55- o40etbw t$i genii rici tcsolYM�tV4dati ■ Peat Class V This soil class not recomrnendeo • : fY ' +'9 30 Figure 3 Note: Detlecrion values shown do not include effect of live load or longitudinal bending. 1. No length of pipe Installed under conditions specified will deflect more than is Indicated; the pipe *Ali deflect less than the amount indicated if specified density is obtained, 2. External loading based upon soil weight of 120 lbs. per cubic toot. 3. Deflections predicted are based upon pipe which was initially circular prior to installation. Actual deflections may differ because of initial out of roundness caused by storage and/or handling. These variations should be taken into account when measured deflections are compared with those in the table. 4, Deeding classliieations are as indicated on page 8 end correspond to ASTM 02321. 5. Deflections listed In table are maximum Tong ternh values. The suggested maximum long term value is 7.5 percent which is approximately equal to a 5 percent initial deflection. 6. Initial deflection is deflection taken within the 1 St Za hours after trench is bacldilled. T DEC-16-1999 13:27 BONAD I MAN-MCCA I N 909 889 3706 P.08 Short Form Specification Scope This specification designates general requirements for unplasticiied polyvinyl chloride (PVC) Plastic Gravity Sewer'Pipe with. integral wall bell and spigot joints for he Conveyance of domestic sewage. Mateviets Pipe and finings shall meet the requirements of ASTM Speofiation 03034 for 4"-15•" SOR 35 and F579 for 18'-27", The pipe shall be colored green for in -ground identification as sewer pipe., Pipe Pipe snarl: be suitable tor use as a gravity server conduit. Provisions must be -made for contraction andr .Y expansion at each joint With; a rubber ring, The Dell shell consist of an integral war section with a solid cross section rubber ring. tact* assembled. securely locked in place to prevent displacement during assembly. Sizes and dimensions shall be as shown in this specification. Standard laying lengths shall be 20 tt. and 13 ft d:1 inch. At manufacturer's option, random lengths of not more than 15% Of total footage of each size may be;hipped•in lieu of standard lengths. Drop Impact Test Pipe (6" long section) shall be subjected to impact from a tree ►etling am (20•Ib. Tip A.) in accordance with ASTM Method of Test D2ait4. No shattering or splitting (denting is not a failure) snail be evident when the following energy is impacted. Norninal Size Inches Ft •Lbs • 4 150 6 210 8 210 •10 220 12 i •22o 1s 220 16. 220 21 220 24. 220 27 `: 220 Fittings.' ; ' ' • .. All fittings and accessories shalt be as manufactured and furnished by the pipe supplier or approved equal and have bell and/or spigot configurations compatible with that of the pipe. Temperature for Testing Pipe shall be designed to pass all tests at 73°F Pipe Stiffness Minimum "pipe Stiffness" (Pp y) at 5% deflection shall be 45 psi for ail sizes when tested in accordance with ASTM Method of Test D2412. 'External loading Properties of Plastic Pipe by Parallel -Plate Loading." Joint Tightness Two sections of pipe shah be assembled in accordance with the manufacturers recommendation. Joint shall De tested in accordance van ASTM D3212, -Joints lgr Drain and Sewer Plastic Pipe Using Flexible Elastornerc Seals.' Flattening There shall be no evidence of splitting. cracking, or breaking when the pipe is tested ab follows' :. Flatten specimen of pipe, six inches bng between parallel plates in i suitable press,, until the distance between the plates is forty percent of the outside diameter-0 the pipe. The rate of loading s shall be uniform and such4 that the eo1`npression is i orrapleted within two t0'.five minutes. Gaskets Material used for elastomeric seal in push. on joints ;hail meet the requirements of ASTM Specrtieaton F 477. I nsta llation Product should be installed in accordance with J-M Publication TR-61 48, "Green.Tile"' PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe Instailation Guide." 10 4 I. DEC-16-1999 13:27 BOARD I MAN-MCCR I N 909 889 3706 P.09 Sizes, Dimensions and Weights Helfand Spigot Assembly (Inches) Pipe Pipe Details - Size' Average Min. Wall Inliiits O.D. Thickness "T" ' 4 4.215 ,- 0.120 6 6.275 • 0.180 8 8.400 0.240 10 10,500 40.30P 12 . 12.500 . 0.390 - 15 16.300 ', 0.431 18 la 701 ' ' 0.586 21 22.947 ',-. 0.632 • - Pipe Size Inches 24"! 27". Min- Wail Ave. 0.D. Thicknexs 2 4:8 ei 3 0.7 1 1 27.953 0.801 • " •• . • Sell Details APPrux- Approx. Weight Da D9 • . p Lbs' in 4.250 4.240 , 5.20 2.90 1.05 6.318 sane 7150 3.50 2.36 8.460 8.440 ioio 4.10 4.24 10,570 10.548 .,4 1240 4.70 6.64 12.577 12.554 . 14150 5.15 9.50 15.380 15.3$2s ' 16'.00 5.40 141 4 18.764 18.764 . 2198 5.90 21.43 . 22110 .22.110 ,25.63 6:!$0_ ..... 29.88 ... ._ . Lbe /Ft 20 572 2284:9179 3282. 100 — 1 1N.2 5 APP3ra8.:9WL 98 AP79°L 12.75 49.47 11 Tnra P nag Engineers/Planners MEMORANDUM Date: Deceniber 8, 1999, To: • Mr. Gregory Bucknell City of Fontana Mr: Michael P. Thornton Subject: L.D. King, Inc. Ductile Iron Pipe Joint Gaskett /Metropolitan Water District (MWD) Crossing I' reviewed. the proposed construction materials for the MWD crossing, including the ductile iron , pipe with restrained joint gaskets with Charles Poling of MWD. He advised that the FIELD UK Gaskets are not acceptable. Mr. Poling recommended that in lieu of restrained joints, concrete encasing of the sewer with 4,000 psi concrete (minimum 6" thick) and install reinforcing steel at each corner .(No. 4 Bars) with ties at three -feet (3') on center. In addition, if' desired, we may substitute polyvinyl .chloride pipe for ductile iron pipe if the pipe is encased in concrete. Based on my discussion with Bondamin-McCain, the MWD alternative is preferred. Should you have any questions or need additional information,. please do not hesitate to call. 1�.f . King, Inc: 2161=Convention Center Way, Suite 1006, Ontario, CA 91764-4464 (909) 937-0200 Fax: (909) 937=0202 ;1DEC-16-1999 13:23 BONADIMAN-MCCAIN 909 889 3706 P.01 BONADIMAN-McCAIN, INC. PH: (909) 885-3435 P 0 BOX .6444, SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92412 FX: (909) 889-3706 ENGINEERS * CONTRACTORS SINCE 1942 LICENSE NO. 74600 A, B, C27 Fax Transmittal TO. . Greg Bucknell COMPANY: City of Fontana PHONE: (909) 350-6646 FAX: (909) 350-6618 DATE: December 16,1999 FROM: Penney Paulson Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 9 REFERENCE: STOVER AVENUE SEWER FROM HEMLOCK TO POPLAR Greg: See attached substitution request. Awl 006i)1g0_6-\\ x2. .4„ Please call (909) 885-3435 if this transmission is not received complete. ite Engineers/Planners MEMORANDUM Date:. December 8, 1999 . • To: Mr. Gregory Bucknell City of Fontana :Prom:_ Mr. Michael?. Thornton L.A. King, Inc. Subject: Ductile Iron Pipe Joint Gaskeit /Metropolitan Water District (MW!)) Crossing- • I"reviewedthe proposed construction materials for the MWi) crossing, Including.the ductile iron pipe with restrained joint gaskets with Charles Poling of MW1). He advisedthat•the FIELD<LQK Gaskets are not acceptable. Mr. Poling recommended that in lieu of restrained joints, concrete. encasing.of the sewer with 4,000 psi concrete (minimum ti" thick) and install reinforcing steel at each corner . (Mo: 4 Bars) with ties, at three -feet (3') on center... In addition, if desired, we shay substitute polyvinyl .chloride pipe for ductile iron pipe if the pipe is encaseditr concrete. Based on my discussion with Bondamin-McCain, the.MWD alternative is preferred. Should you have any questions or need additional information,. please do not hesitate to cal 1,.D. King, inc. 2151 Convention Center Way, Suite 100o, Ontario, CA.9'1764-4464 (909) 937-0200' Fax: (909) 9.37-0202 DEC-16-1999 13:23 BONAD I MAN-MCCR I N 909 889 3706 P.02 r Dear Greg: We are' request' as. specified Pipe with for the SD LICENSE NO, 74800 A. 9 & C 27 INCORPORATED 1942 TELEPHONE (909) 885.3435 TELECOPIER(909) 889-3706 December 16, 1999 Gregory J. Bucknell, P.E. City of Fontana Engineering Division 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, CA 92335 BONADI M AN McCain Inc. Engineers ( Contractors POST OFFICE BOX 6444 SAN BERNARDINO, CALIF. 92412 OFFICE 290 SOUTH LENA ROAD SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408 YARD 635 TENNIS COURT LANE SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408 VIA FACSIMILE: (909) 350-6618 REFERENCE: SLOVER AVENUE SEWER FROM HEMLOCK AVE. TO POPLAR AVE. ctit trt etts-ct5zot, wt authorization to substitute 161 linear feet,of 8" Class'250 Ductile Iron Pipe tem,6 on the above referenced project, with • 1'61 linear feet of 8" SDR35 Sewer of concrete, encasement at the MWD Waterline. Enclosed are the specifications 35 Sewer Pipe we are requesting to use. There will be no additional cost to the. City of Fontana for this substitution. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Very truly yours, BONADIMAN-McpAIN, INC. Jeff C. Bonadiman Vice President AMERICA PROGRESSES THROUGH CONSTRUCTION ea.NAt1 Z(f 4 etiamdet DEC-16-1999 13:24 BONRDIMAN-MCCAIN 909 889 3706 R.03 4•1_ j..m PIPE Ring-Tite® PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe and Fittings DEC-16-1999 13:24 BONADIMRN-MCCAIN 909 889 3706 P.04 Ring:rite PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe and Fittings Ring -Tice joint meets *fleeting tightness requirements, simplifies assembly • E` I spigot pipe ends are ,auppiied from factory wim `Locked -in" rybbvr sealing ;bevels. ring provides tight, flexible • seal. Meets ►uiremeits of s.' 3ASTM D-321Z- Joints for ,,,;Drain. and Sewer Pipes s using-Flexitite Elastomenic Seals." The, bell is an integral part of the pipe section with the same strength. Figure 1 Meets ASTM D3034-SDR 35 4"-15"and ASTM F679 1 B"-27" . Introduction The growing demand for an effective all-out attack on water pollution highlights tie need for improved sanitary sewage collection systems. A modern system needs pipe with improved design for • reserve strength and stiffness to increase Toad -bearing capacity - all within the • framework of maximizing Sewer system Capacity at reasonable cast. Ring -rite PVC sewer pipe is designed to meet this need. Applications J-M PVC sewer pipe is suitable for conveying domestic sanitary sewage as well as certainindustrial wastes. For further information regarding the suitability of PVC for ' conveying various chemicals, contact your J-M pipe representative. 1. Chemical Resistant: J-M Ringflte PVC sewer pipe is unaffected by the fluids found in ordnary domestic sewage. It is immune to sewer gases anti Vie sutit fec acid generated q< by the templetien of the a, hydrogen sulfide: cycle. It is immune4to corrosive soils... both aDcafine oracidc. z. Abrasion Resistant: JA +1 Rit+g Tite PVC sewer `pipe has excellent _ resistance to abrasion, gouging and scoring -- superior to that of most common piping materials. 3. Flow Characteristics: J•M Ring-Tite PVC sewer pipe with long lengths, smooth interior, and factory -made close tolerance joints provides a Manning "n" coefficient of .009. High -carrying capacity makes possible the use of flatter grades or smatter diameter pipe. Ask your J-M sales representative for a figw nomograph and the report "Hydraulic Characteris lcs of PVC Sewer Pipe in Sanitary Sewers," a joint study by Johns -Manville and Utah State University. Locked -in Ring Through research and technology we proudly offer "biked -in" rubber ring PVC sewer pipe. This factory -made joint eliminates the need to insert rings in the field. Joint design and close manufacturing tolerances allow this joint to pass a 25 feet to head hydrostatic test in the laboratory and provides the basis for exacting intiltrationfexfiltration specifications. Se secure in the future by designing with J-M Rk,g Tite PVC sewer pipe with low infiltration - specify infiltration not to exceed S0 gaAortsrmch dipmetedmile/day. Call for ASTM D-3034 5DR35 _ r Provides Greater External F, Load-Carryilhg Capacity. • This etlows for the design s ,. and construction of PVC gravity sewer systems (4"-15'y consistent with test engineering practices. A uniform minimum -pipe stiffness." (F/pin = 46 psi) means no weak links. Raley means that J-M PVC sewer pipe ine.10,12&15" diameters has 60 to 75 percent greater pipe Stiffness than S0R xZ and SOR 41 PVC sewer pipe. This increased "pipe stiffness' provides ltle extra needed at that critiical time when the pipe is rest being installed in the trench and undergoing bedding and backtllt. 2 DEC-16-1.999 13:25 BONADIMRN—MCCAIN 909 889 3706 P.05 1 External Loads Background Loads imposed on buried. conduits have, in past practice. been calculated by using the Marston load kende. For trench loads Marston has a formula for rigid:pipe and another formula for eexible pipe. It is important to recognize that under identical conditions of bury the soil load generated on a fexiblo conduit is less than the Toad generated on a rigid conduit The conlpatitivg toad on a rigid conduit verses tie load on a flexible oonduit is expressed as the ratio of trench width to the flexible pipe OD. fly definfion. a flexible conduit is one which:Win deflect before reaching failure: Mars on's Formulas., ., :'For Soil Loads Rigid Pipe W-= Ca.'- N`B Flexrbte Pipe W = .Ca w 8, Ba Where: W = load on pipe (Iblirr, ft.) Ce= Load Coefficient w s Sol unit weight [N Ba. Ditch width (ft) = O.D. of pipe (ft) Prism Load ' Loads imposed on buried conduits have been calculated by using the Marston load formulas for rigid and flexible pipe. However. it has been determined that the Marston formula for flexible pipe may not determine the maximum long term load — the "Prism load" formula is more accurate. The "Prism Load" is the weight of the column of soil directly above the pipe. Thus, precautions in keeping Me trench narrow are unnecessary fur a flexible pipe installation. The linporrar►t thing is to cornpact the haunching material from flee pipe out to the ndisturbed trench walls. ,Therefore. J•M suggests that the maximum long term load be determined by the prism load for design. Prism Load: P, = wH (Ibslft?) Where: PP— Pressure at the top of the pipe due to the weight of the soil (lb/ft') w = Soli unit weight (ibIf t') H . Depth from top of pipe to top of ground (ft.) Note: To convert prism toad (IbJf•x) to lb./linear ft. multiply by the 0. D.. of the pipe in feet or: W Live toads Live toads imposed on buried conduits from traffic must also be Considered in a design and become more important at shallow depths. The combination of soil Toad and live load must be H2O Highway Load 16 Height of Cover (Feel) a 12 to a 4 2 Figure 2 • Dell road 120I4/cot. ti.s 4. H2O live belt + impac 500'.z` tow Py'verueal SOH Piessyre (t.bs/FF'3 Total bad rive +dead 1500 2000 Note: To convert vertical sop pressure to load on pipe:— " pounds per meat foot -multiply by-O.D:_ of•plpe in ft.. ' tLive bad°appred on assumed area of 36" x 40'.;- added together to design for the maximum Toad as shown in curves above. The soil bad and eve load must be added to determine the total external Toad on a buried conduit This combined bad should be used for design. Figure 2 ihustrates the magnitude of sod and rive loads separately and also charts the magnitude oft e combined or total bads. The curves in figure 2 apply only for H2O highway loading and a soil weight of 120 Ibsicu. ft. At shallow depths of cover — 3 feet and less, flexible conduits can deflect and rebound under dynamic loading conditions if the trench width is not suffrciently bridged. Unless special precautions• are taken to bridge the trench in shallow Installations, tyre breaking up of flexible road surfaces may result. Therefore, for shallow installations under flexible road surfaces (between 1 and 3 feet), J-M recommends Class 1' material be used in the pipe zone and up to the road elevation. This recommendation is not meant to conflict with the design engineers specifications and his specifications will govern. 'see page 8 for definition of Class 1. 3 DEC-16-1999 13.25 Pipe Deflection BONADIMAN—MCCAIN 909 889 3706 P.06 Deflection is defined as the change in vertical inside diameter of a flexible con- duit when subjected to a vertical load. The amount of deflection that will occur in any flexible conduit is a function of three faClors: 1. Pipe Stiffness (F/Ay) 2. Soil Stiffness 3. Load on the pipe It is important to recognize that flexible conduits per- form differently in the ground than they do under laboratory flat plate loading. The interaction 01 pipe stiff- ness and soil stiffness com- bine to give flexible conduits a high effective strength when burled. Methods for Predicting Pipe Deflection The most commonly used approach in predicting deflection has been the Modified 'Iowa Deflection Formula." Modified Iowa Formula: Ay ;D� K w'ts El, I. .064'r) ;..Where: ny =;verticat'de►Ie:lion (Inches) Ih . lag factor (t.$ maximum) K bedding factor w = earth load (lb.fin.) r = mean radius (CD-1) (in.) . 2 E = modulus of elasticity (lb./in.)) 1 a moment of inertia 13 12 (in.)) soil stiffness (Ib./in.z) E' Although Considered a COn- servative approach, con- siderable variation in predicted deflection will result depending upon me choice of empirical con- stants E. K and Dt, Empirical methods of predict ling deffeCtivn have evolved in recent years which eliminate the guesswork inherent in the Iowa method. When design is based on actual laboratory test and previous field measurements it is unnecessary to know the actual load acting on the pipe or the soil stiffness. Thus an installation can be designed with a known fac- tor of safety provided enough empirical data is available, To accommodate the pro- blem of having to establish data for the number of trench widths that are found in the field, me prism toad was chosen because it represents the maximum loading condition on a flexi- ble pipe. Time lag to account for future settlement of the backlll can be included by choosing long- term values of deflection. J-M has d iteloped through laboratory testsand actual field data the maximum long term deflection chart, Figure 3. shown on page 7. This chart eliminates the guesswork in predicting defection and gives the design engineer a quick ready reference. This chart is for PVC SDR 35 Sewer pipe only. The values given for deflection limits are the ultimate long term deflection that will occur in a particular s041 crass having a given density (compaction) in Me haunching area of the pipe zone for various heights or cover (feet). 0 DEC-16-1999 13:26 BONAD I MAN-MCCA I N 909 889 3706 P.07 r. Use of Maximum Long Term Deflection Chart • 1. Where live roads are not a factor or not involved in the total external toad on the pipe. the chart can be used directly to determine the limit of the maximum long-term deflection of Use PVC pipe. Example: If an 8" PVC SDR 35 Sewer Pipe is installed in Class IV material. having 85% compaction in the pipe zone and with 12 feet of cover. What will be the maximum ring term deflection limit? Answer; Pipe will never deffect;more than 5% (color code — dark green). 2. Where five Wads roust be considered, deterttiirte, T,rsr, the combined letat external load on the piee.':Next determine the equivalent prism load ()without live tor the:particular pipe size , involved using the table of prism loads. Table 1. Read acrasseto the left for the height of cover (ft.) for the equivalent prism load. Using this height of cover with the bedding class and proctor clonally, enter the maximum long term deflection chart. Figure 3, to determine the maxihium long term deflection limit. Example:)) a 12- PVC SDP 35 Sewer Pipe is installed in, Class 1I1 material, having 65% compaction in the pipe zone, with 3 feet of cover and 120 IbsJt1' soil. and H-20.(highway load) live load are imposed On the buried pipe, what will be the maximum long term deflection limit? Answer: 1. The combined (dead and Nye) load on the pipe will be approximately 10001bsfftt or 1000 x 1 ft. (pipe diameter in feet) - 'r000 IbsJ1in ft. (per Figure 2). Enter tattle of prism loads Gable 1) under column 12— Pipe Diameter (Inches) — and read down until nearest figure to 1000 is reached, across from soil wt. of 120 IbsJrt.'. In this case, 1000 appears eppostte 120 mein?, and 8 It. — height of cover. This represents the equivalent prism toad tor the combined (dead and live) load given above. Now enter maximum long terns deflection chart and road the maximum long term deflectron color Code for Class HI bedding classification, 65% density, and 8 ft. of cover. Dark green — maximum long term deflection will not exceed 5%.. in working with these charts, it becomes apparent that 1. Soil density in the pipe zone plays a greater role than coif type in the control of deflection in buried flexible conduits. 2. The amount of deflection is independent of pipasize, providing all pipe sizes are SDA 35. Note pipe size does not appear in the chart for maximum long term dellectionS. Maximum Long -Term Deflections of PVC (SDR 35) Pipe (Percent) DENSITY yASTM (Praetor) Height of Cover (Feet) 1, Bedding AASHO gClaSsiTrcation T-99 Ir; Gravel Class t Class II 90% 801 Sand Class 111 90% 75% 65% Clay Class IV 85% 75% 651''w 12 14 f6 18 1St Peat Crass V This soil class not recommended ,g0 22 24 26 25 30 k:.:r,g) ti y1 .1 Figure 3 Note: Deflection values shown do not include effect of live toad or longitudinal bending. 1. No length of pipe Installed under conditions specified will deflect mare than is Indicated; the pipe yell deflect less than the amount indicated if specified density is obtained. 2. External loading based upon soil weight of 120 )bs. per cubit foot 3. Deflections predicted are based upon pipe which was initlally circular prior to installation. Actual deflections may differ because of initial out of roundness caused by storage and/or handling. These variations Should be taken into account when measured deflections we compared with those in the table. • 4, bedding classifications are as indicated on page 8 end correspond to ASTM 02321. 5. Deflections listed In table are maximum long term values. The suggested maximum long term value is 7.5 percent which is approximately equal to a 5 percent Initial deflection. 6. Initial deflection is deflection taken within the 1St 24 hours after trench is backf)led. DEC-16-1999 13:27 BONADIMAN-MCCAIN 909 889 3706 P.08 Short Form Specification Scope This specification designates general requirements for unl)last►ciied polyvinyl chloride (PVC) Plastic Gravity Sewer'Pipe with ►ntegraf wall bell and spigot joints for Ole Cotweyance of domesuc sewage• Materials Pipe and fittings shall mBet the requirements of ASTM Specification 03034 for 4"-15r SOR 35 and FS79 for 18"•ar. The pipe shall be colored green for in -ground identification as sewerpipe: Pepe shill be suitable tor use as:,a' gravity sewer conduits Provisions; must be , .made' for contraction land,. t Fittings expansion at each joint with_= ' ,All fittings and accessories a rubber ring, The bell shall -shalt be as manufactured consist of an integral wall and furnished by the pipe section with a Solid supplier or approved equal cross section rubber ring. and have bell and/or spigot ractoiy assembled_ securely configurations compatible locked in place to prevent with that of the pipe. displacement during assembly. Sizes and dimensions Shall be as shown in this specification. Standard laying tangent shall be20ft. and 13ft_ t1 inch. At manufacturers option, random lengths of not more than 157. of total footage of each size may Qe shipped•in lieu of standard lengths. Orop Impact Test Pipe !6' long section) shall be subjected to impact from a tree ►alling tup (20-Ile. Tup A.) in accordance with ASTM Method of Test D2444. No shattering or splitting (denting is not a fa&Iure) shall be evident when the following energy is impacted- 10 Norivnal Size Inches Ft • Lbs a 6 e -10 12 15 sg 21 24 27 150 210 210 220 220 220 220 220 220 220 Temperature for 1t!stIng Pipe shall be 006igned to pass all tests at 73`F Pipe Stiffness Minimum "pipe Stiffness' (Fro y) at 5% deflection Shall be 46 psi for all sizes when tested in accordance with ASTM Method of Test 02412, 'External Loading Properties of Plastic pipe by Parallel -Plate loading." Joint Tightness Two sections of pipe shalt be assembled in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendation. Joint shall be tested in accordance wren ASTM D321 2, "Joints for Drain and Sewer Plastic Pipe Using Flexible Etastorneric Seals.' Flattening There shall be no evidence of splitting. cracking, or breaking when the pipe is tested as follows' Flatten specimen of *pipe, six •nches king between prrallel plates in G suitable press unfit the distance betv!►eern the plates is forty pereeni'of the outside diameter of the pipe, The rate of loading Shell be uniform and ;Such' 'that thQ cornpnession completed withjn swap tofive ' minutes. Gaskets Material used for elastomeric seal in push - on Joints shall meet the requirements of ASTM Specification F 477. Installation Product should be installed in accordance with J-M Publication TR-6148, "Green-Tilee' PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe Installation Guide." A (' DEC-16-1999 13: 27 BONAD I MAN-MCCA IN 909 889 3706 P.09 Sizes, Dimensions and Weights sellenti Sweat Assembly (Inches, Assembly Stripe-.... •NMEMWAMMWTIMMI ./6! bs Pipe Pipe Details • .. . Size' Average Min. Wall Inches 0.D. Thickness ."T" ... . •• '4 4.215 ., 0.120 6 6.275 ' o.leo 8 8-400 ; 0.240 10 10,500 lit 0.300 12 , 12.500 ,- 0.36,0 1615.300 -'.., : 0.437 18 18.701 ' 0.536 21 22.047 i',, 0.632 .. .. . - • • " Pipe Size Inches . . 27" min. Wall Ave; 0.D. Thickness "T._ 24.803 0,711 27.953 0.801 oe 0 o. Sell Details • . Approx. Approx. Weight DS Da* ,09 *. , $ Lbe./py_ 4.250 4.2400 520 2-90 1.05 6.318 8,308 ,i 7150 3.50 2,36 8.450 e.4a0,., 1010 4.10 , 4.24 10.570 I 0.5413, A. 12.40 4.70 6.64 12.577 12.554 , 1450 5.15 9.50 15.380 15.382• 1'8:00 5.40 14.14 18.764 18.764 2198 5.90 " 21.43 . . .. ._ . 22.110 '22.110 25 63 649 , 29.88 Approx. Approx. Wt. OS DB D9 N Lb/Ft. 32.50280 11.25 28.72 28.1712.75 4947 11 TOTAL P.09 CITY OF FONTANA • INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT project. )C4t Contractor. C Ems! U1PMENT AND I OR LABOR: No. Of Equipment No. Of Men Description (of Equipment or Labor) Hours -Item No. • Report No. Day Date:_�2 L' q M T W. F S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start Stop: Weak Remarks (reason for idleness or other remarks) (j36) Ck- Contractor Title Inspector Sheet Of CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT - Project •port No. Day Date: 12 a S� M T Tit F S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start Stop: Weath r MUM - item No. ph (k1, Contractor.!,..a# Me(./14:&-) nn4-0.--) S - ' • Remarks (reason for Idleness or other remarks) EQUIPMENT AND I OR LABOR: No. Of Equipment No. Of Men Description (Of Equlpment or Labor) Z2S Sxca.tAvcd..r / 4.lJ�T -t 7T a)CK , i. - ) T12,✓e. K ( 2 3S ExcAo A-casr —/ 13o ay (mAe .Y �--, Tt 2 4r '00*• b u.1-112 sae--cca r is t--)Cc,(a.tri:,Z-i c� e va" J �I?.. n ran ��� l , `sr 1✓ l? T•e Contractor Title Inspecto Sheet Of CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT - Project .I')t3-r *port No. Day Date: 12 — - M W Th F S S Circle Day Shift Hoots Start Stop: — Weath - r Contractor P\'C' C-1: ? A.n t f - !Lim tiOiki_b_.%. • Remarks (reason for Idleness or other remarks) EQUIPMENT AND I OR LABOR: No. Of Equipment No. Of Men Description (Of Equipment or Labor) / I zas t -Avvo.--cam / c t - r -r*,o tie._ c.it -treee...,t —! / Z 3E tea, -wr 93o GYr (�,krr4r —// Pck---r2 �N T' rtoN � �'- wec- ' .., �b‘15e, t S F3c C (fit--�Af C eA.A1 t tis pt Z' L L� �,►�-r U1./s,e' (&tz k \ u� ul� T� L� C �) iZ. '_ -r v "e c g • A. r�G ,r��; _ r. r—n TE. S-r •Agc-rt� T7 W-t�r— (� �n • S 5T4 . tD i't[D Contractor Title Inspect Sheet Of CITY OF FONTANA • INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT Protect Report No. Day Date:_ M T W. Th j) S S Circle Day Shlft Hours Start Stop: Hours - Item Nn ` !AAA- lV Contractor:'-L%r` `am, 1 Remarks (reason for idleness or other remarks) EqUIPMENT AND I OR LABOR: No. 0f Equipment No. Of Men Description (Of Equipment or Labor) 2 25 EXcp.Na•r __1 _ u.16,-i-ssr "'rkvtv._ ,----�, ! C-ia5w Tu./ etc L' / 25" - --ctt 2 r.s,r 1 '+I( �-r�*�-r - - _ C51.3• 'A''-L1 I h.. G .'rL(.Itn C�.a' f-. i,__e'S Po" -c -C-c)4-- t )CL-Ni -n A-1 Q _ , tZa ` '1 & P_ 4-to t t t5-t` it-S- ,� . - - - - Pt Contractor Title Insp Sheet Of CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT Project: *port No. Day_ Date: t 2 - — 99 MTW FSS Circle Day Shift Hours Start Stop: Weather Hours -Item No. ________I-_3 _4____Clit Lt tctair6 Contractor.1 ICn CA.,-,,..._ 1 - . • Remarks (reason for Idleness or otherremarks) EQUIPMENT AND/ OR LABOR_ No. Of Equipment No. Of Men Description (0f Equipment or Labor) 1 2,36 Cc-1- a._ra-.-c_+-r CT c._r{TZu c tt 2.25 , -r c1%0 Car Lmi - r -.r 2— delltpF r-e4-re:) r- S " Sa r •-TF" 1 L] ^ -r `/1 W(1 L L7) -� La V . L-0 - 1 � l CaL�► ['Cte . / 1 ` p . L C� C - c r o•bo.. Contractor Title Inspec/ Sheet 0f CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT Project:.JC.tt-/,xe.l Hours - Item No. Contractor. n4.4,1 t Alk Report No. Day Milr Date: t2 - Mr) W. Tb F S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start - Stop: Weather EQUIPMENT AND / OR LABOR: Remarks (reason for Idleness or other remarks] No. Of Equipment No. Of Men Description (Of Equipment or Labor) 221 CAI ta4'.AcJrar'�a �� t T5 - � t l * ,_(12e%-t-t Z2S 6T �5.u.e— ti.,i -t ,-- , —. 1 :3C) LIFT CJAsr�„r PtC.te-• t., p - a'.Dt - ( r arm. -•A .0 8' z atalcp&-&-ren-tr-5 w -ri e,e.) L�-� t 'p �c �.� 5���r-�u� �►. -. - 12..� l\,..� c ' �!_•. l'N g t - , . see 'Tc� ST"- c/ F9 r' c -r-t . 4Lo Contractor Title lnsp or Sheet Of CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT Protect: Hours - Item No. *port No. Day Date: 12 -- 8 - 99 M T cTh F S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start Stop: Weather Contractor: P,Q C—r,Zi_3 9 r,--rA1N+v,AA, kE(CSK.. 11 t gTiv•tD Remarks (reason for idleness or other remarks) EQUIPMENT AND I O1 LABOR: No. Of Equipment No. Of Men Description (0I Equipment or Labor) Txt Crr ^, O 1-5rI1 U. Oto r+-NS Contractor Title Inspecto Sheet Of CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT ort No. Day ate: 12 - 6 - qg T W Th F S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start 1 . Stop: 3. 3o Hours -Item No.r- Contractor., ��C rAT--3 1 v - #.J � �IS . r. Remarks (reason for Idleness or other remarks) EQUIPMENT AND I OR LABOR: No. Of Equipment No. Of Men Description (0f Equipment or Labor) 1 " 2'55 Ca-r EgeAuretb-r- _. .. eT 'r'R.�c_K 11 egg 22S (..0.-r Ex c. -t- - g )4 93o C,a.-r L E-r B Z. wK.� TfLvt{t =ocenW'..,A...3 2 c c-Cvuw- g $ 1 Tt-5.-tssr 4 C-sr -s f / Contractor Title Inspector. Sheet 0f CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT ProJect:�bn •C'e.4rc° No. Day•ort e: 12-3- g9 M T W Th( Shift Hours Start S S Circle Day Stop: . Hours - Item No. a1 tAkx w i N 6 , Contractor. iA'plM0,L1 • • Remarks (reason for idleness or other remarks) EQUIPMENT AND I OR LABOR: No. Of Equipment No. Of Men Description (Of Equipment or Labor) - cl>dar -c tr' o s \ 3 1,7v-1-r .9.4 (A 1JAi Contractor Title tns c or Sheet Of CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT •ortNo. Day_, Date: 1,2 - Z - 9c M T W g F S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start Stop: Hours - Item No. de .. / 1, Contractor. MCA 1?x,i•sA.nt n-,A,�.a . _ . Remarks (reason for Idleness or other remarks) EQUIPMENT AND/OR LABOR: No. 0f Equipment No. 0f Men Description (0f Equipment or Labor) 2.35C uarartec- IPOC.te ,crew 'r 4Jc 4. S ecXC et c�.o�no�i-' , q2.� 1?O CrJvT EL,ta ler-/ rp %G. ' 'T24/ C. ( � 1 "iZ#aHn S-Mas- Qr04 P S ce-A- ^S C.)t. i.- N E= � V tried-.;4'2 �xat S TP L 4S St-c� Contractor Title Inspector Sheet 0f CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT Iort No. Day_ e: 12-1 — 9 9 M T ®Th F S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start Stop: Hours -Item No. t( S Contractor. NDIMar.,3 . Cp:1, t Remarks (reason for Idleness or other remarks) EQIIIPMENT AND IOR LABOR: No. 01 Equipment No. Of Men Description (0f Equipment or Labor) 235 5:"(44ear•Art-ea-r- 8 b..-tE.t TIZJc-t _ 8 e tz�.) 'muc_tt 8 / 22 45 Cap T Etc ci,4ano--_Ar- , 43 930 F..o•-r-. (sams,cr 8 2 . -PK d tC ,../, "tCt.f c le- t=c �/ a C' 2 .^n.-c,., c TL-la.4isi-cr Alt SITE l t . o� a - cries, L. `TLC•J cis xc�crra-rya `j ' - C� t (2." V )-t -� f a-ctk- �. �,, C i� << 1 S r a r ?v14T) . lk T�_s t A A. -r . • 1=�cr-lZ - - r"Z S 't"4t, c. Contractor Title Inspecto Sheet 0f CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT rt No. Day_ te: II- —99 MC)W Th F S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start 'i,6.s • Stop: 3% Hours-Itemt No. #-\I LA CA CA 0,g Contractor. . ' .Th 1 r ..c s. 20 prn--. 6344 , Remarks (reason for idleness or other remarks) EQUIPMENT AND!OR LABOR: No. Of Equipment No. Of Men Description (Of Equipment or Labor) 253 &r E 4...5cLirCe " i?...,cic [-rev-s -TIL.,e_jC. I • ' 2Z‘Caa-r EticcAv L___./ ci3o Ca•r .lsra-rwcr- 1 `4414 4.-r- 4 ttchoe .2. pvcsc ..t1?. -TR a MC% 1 FiZra:mcw / op 4 41 (ter-r-s 1-r_C.. t 1s, a1..Z -Li Ye—.—7 ""rrat--re'--r> —t-z� ,�—r sr.� . .13 + 9 a C ��L t C c�tU -• S t'C'�+- -T�5 T t Vic. e... 0- f»T STD -7 Contractor Title Inspecto Sheet Of CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT Day •rtNo. : Il•29—c ®T W Th F S S Circle Day Shlft Hours Start `1,a.,; Stop: Hours - Item No. _ . - , _ _ - Contractor: l"4c44Aks ATPi S 4 A.K.S . *J Remarks (reason for Idleness or other remarks) EgUIPMENT AND 10 • LABOR: No. Of Equipment No. Of Men Description (Of Equipment or Labor) 235 Cam- £xactoa __I 22S Coon' X'.A ®• .. C,A.-C.L b .Y 1 W. f3 i3Act<Ltae ■1.11� I. ra+w op 2 diftei. a -A K...Jr' e. _• mid— '-1 (_,a.r�,,_-i- S C'a..a l ,n..) & -4c» - �c r- ,e,r- 1 -17:5 a -T RYA . (a' + .5 .E[r d-.t_,cs.7" et ,r- 12" V\i\ tkot" . 6•C -t (20.R9 ,• Contractor Title CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT litort No. Day_ Date: I t- 2- q 9 M T Th F S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start "1 ve% Stop: -et,.. Hours -Item No. �p - At,C�,4. I 7.4 Contractor- #' % n.4A iJ _ Remarks (reason for Idleness or other remarks) . EQUIPMENT AND 10 LABOR: No. 01 Equipment No. Of Men Description (01 Equipment or Labor) I 235 Can. Excft t 1 TO e- I o CAT Lbrc! $ I 4 K L Carr iI ocid , CiclSuu i-te c 1L [/) 4_,50 .1T) T zEvr --r I . /-"AAi Qi) Sl .4-1 t C am-s r _ { 2 bQe.s-A-rtor S e -ru2N3 cao- 4 (V14,1,y_ Contractor Title Inspee Sheet Of CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT IL / `�!`t�� • sport No. Day_ Date: I(-23-- q' MfW Th F S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start i Aein Stop: Hours - Item No. -3 Contractor- &CA pt MA.nJ 4 : .E32 m _ Remarks (reason for idleness or other remarks) EQUIPMENT AND I OR LABOR: No. 01 Equipment No. Of Men Description (0I Equipment or Labor) _J 2.z5 Ga.-r ..1ccavxerez,r- 1 9 O c.o.-r- �pZt�.�a• 1r_r 424. i crz T2..iLrc 1 t S4-tt t "TM LICK. ( .-tS0.:1.12 T yr _ 2xctc t, 1nn&t-ilcYmet--• -"'�'-' t t IST_ e-- \ (1-121stAc.-f]rLt1 "E=E-r v1.1.E1 � . e'�e� Gs V- • ��i��Y iYL ke 1 �J 1 M /N. t ..� `ice E-cam .r cr p t rr, L,. . ,-/i--r- S-rA +'-Vca -t--d Cos'.-f et t) LP. c1 t-i' f t— ST/�. CpCQ 1,42 -Tre 4 4 C b . Contractor Tltie Sheet Of CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT - Protect: "Port No. Day Date: I(-72 —99 T W Th F S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start • Stop: Hours - Item No. , Contractor. t 61 6 4 ° Remarks (reason for idleness or other remarks) EQUIPMENT AND/OR LABOR: No. 0f Equipment No. 0f Men Description (0f Equipment or Labor) �►�sr✓�C1'Ct9-r Sr • ,d—rAAA f'Wigt t�AY • t/ yY1 ti LLA-: ems;.+—r�Gn ,A.s Lr(-r--' t r o 6,D-r J)��-r--�--v�. S Contractor Title Inspe or Sheet Of CITY OF FONT PA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT Project SL 0 i/tri2 A lig, Sete) Ole Contractor .BO,VA t) lrnAA) /91d A M) EQUFMENT AND/OR LABOR: • J . N_.OP•• DESQRFTION / HOURS MA Report No. Day Da. i/-/9-99 M T W T®S 3 Cirri. Day Shift Hours Stilt Pete Stop p9 Z� PEA• WEATHER 4.6,,t0..- m?20 e0ekteo..0 (! • REIIAARCS • other nornwksl . ' pJr Air ‘r.2PEle 0. a /i i f i22G� A• SOD Cl� .l A.%,r .3 z 3 ,/ / i �.�'.. .t.a / ..rr._t ."/ .._. I,. '„d ,_,409 •- ✓.. > , Contractor 1 2/92 JTleb CITY OF FONTA�• INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT Projects ir / r +t Contractoi w/471 M iar.1 (j3. i ►..t EQUIPMENT AND/OR LABOR: EQUIPMT. NO. . / / NO. OF MEN DESCRIPTION (Of Equipment or Labor) z..5Crr1'r_Mr.4 -cmr _ 9 3ea G/1,-r CIn+r 235 EXC 4 4 • port No. Day Date l l — t FR —R9 M T W ely S s Circle Day Shift Hours start 1 Ai Stop 3 3oD..,, HOUR$ - ITEM NO. WEATHER REMARKS (Reason for Idleness or other remarks) i i 1 / 1Dt ct.1. - t1. g y ""TA. 2 +AO Contractor Title 12/92 41T/ab CITY OF FONTAimpr/11eon No. Day Date It— 1 —I —gel INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT M T TFSS Circle Day Shift Hours Start HOURS • ITEM NO. WEATHER Project L.ine.t.ho /Le Contractor Ein /1.4.1 Wp EQUIPMENT AND/OR LAt3OR: EQUIPMT. NO. NO. OF MEN DESCRIPTION (Of Equipment or Labor) CACSKA.Ag REMARKS (Reason for Idleness or otter remarks) t t q C-Prr 2 35 E.x cee-r0--/ L.)....Arteor c.t CLL"T12.A.J 1 1 Drrp --nzoc•le- pt • L.-17 141 rx-4.TNE, V'c:)eisrs-wk"3 op LATbews f C:Tcs..CrA"-reo 40-• c:=), c=reP t.._c:A.)Er- • 12.42::a4.-1,16.57) t N-41% ; )%4 CCJAio...7.15 4=4-, - 'Svc E, I 2." (2. -7-4C5DArt1 .a..-r 4 se, T)iiq £A.5"T" 1;?.. . ev•-1 Ct÷..) • SYVG (, 4. .A. 4.2.4.Bc) wig..c. Contractor Title Ins ctor 12/92 JT/ab CITY OF FONTANA • INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT - Protect: let No. Day Date: l l — 1(e - q M eW Th F S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start -. Hours - Item No. 1e0,-1 S�,�,,,.,,.�,� Contractor /vMC A.v i Mgm '7 2' 60,1 1 • Remarks (reason for idleness or other remarks) EQUIPMENT AND I OR LABOR: No. 0f Equipment No. Of Men Description (0f Equipment or Labor) t 4 SC, C.A T (.OACZ uJ4 its("" " reJLit Z.A.0 E,41cru.d a. 1DLA lets, Tt? t 1 < Il.t-lL .r e *L-'1 (x1 c-,l L b r..) oplj l L iAtt yes -S {� f ..a-c2.4c -re-v We S X E�9 �--c`Go �,�� —4 1M1J. pJ ktv v t. un„a Sl s, 7-nem qczon 4 c4-rL-t-a Co 14- 2) w� r s /.-�- o' - •� i L , s-r4 + e r-a Lo 1+ O Dvvs- - Contractor Title Inspec 'r.. Sheet Of • CITY OF FONTAN# No. Day Date 11-IS-g9 INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT DT W T F s s Circle Day Shift Hours Start `1 Arn Stop 3; 30 . / • • Project4hverly w6r Contractor L n.tantaw! ' c@ C A.1,.4 1 � C, , EQUIPMENT AND/OR LABOR: EQUIPMT. NO. 1 1 NO. OF MEN DESCRIPTION (Of Equipment or Labor) cl.5O (.. "Te../1 u 8 4 HOURS - ITEM NO. . WEATHER 72 • REMARKS (Reason for Idleness or other remarks) LC2Ct,.s Vt2 c 1 1 23S' ExC ZLIG '-tom c.►c; r� � /-..��q 4M / e' y g r (DN." - 51"'r 11.1 spec - - lvnt 1�� t= a `na Tt o N —r e — rr4F f r^=• .St[a J.l E. =7'A t O + oe • / c xe Ar Contractor Title Inspector 12/92 JTlab 4111 CITY OF FONTANA --' INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT L / Project -5C-�lER . )6 . • &IN); Contractor EQUIPMENT AND/OR LABOR: Report No. , Day Date • (L - (a - 9.7 M V T F SS Circle Day Shift Hours Stitt EQUIPMT. NO. NO. OF MEN r 2 1 DESCRIPTION (Or Equipment or Labor)- �URL5sn/'tAAAL / • k�lC�_/�� g9c,eA r l--tgL1a�� f;W-- i2„sc e Pi LtC-• LPL HOURS - ITEM NO. ER • REMARKS (Reason for idleness or other remarks) O • -r - • • • �� r I " A. tr\fa, ee r T� � �� A ...s � J LE n b r .d)F- �� pe. . . off tom, ...IndC,--•r, s car ccr= C9€' n+..A"No1e. last k - -�< < < . Orli 0; p -t-�• xCU-A t t . —rr At9-/. 3 Tv? i S A t._. t_• Vim?©L••'td.r tLV$ • CVcvot> .. �� (i-ar�-r-R�,c -cam -�-' t. t tx . .q L 1- ((- d t-f2-9g -^ S-r, (-r K-4v441 ) Contractor Title In actor t 2/92 JT/ab City of Fontana CALIFORNIA Jeff Bonadiman, Vice President Bonadiman - McCain, Inc. 280 South Lena Road P.O. Box 6444 San Bernardino, CA 92412 RE: Slover Avenue Sewer from Hemlock Avenue to Popular Avenue MWD's Additional Requirements Dear Mr. Bonadiman: November 9, 1999 Enclosed for your use and action is a copy of L.D. King, Inc.'s memorandum dated October 14, 1999 on MWD's additional requirements to cross their water feeder transmission line on Slover Avenue. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned, at (909) 350-6646. Sincerely, Community Development Department Engineering Division reg J. Bucknell, P.E. Princip\ Civil Engineer/Special Projects cc: City Engineer Associate Engineer/Special Projects Engineering Technician I/Special Projects Public Works Inspector (JC) Michael Thornton, P.E., L.D. King, Inc. Penny Paulson, Office Manager, Bonadiman - McCain, Inc. Joe Defillips, Project Superintendent, Bonadiman - McCain, Inc. (Field Delivered) www.fontana.org 8353 SIERRA AVENUE FONTANA, CAUFORNIA 92335-3528 (909) 350-7600 recycled paper , Engineers/Planners MEMORANDUM TO: Grego Bucknell, P.E. City of Fontana FROM: Michael Thornton L.A. King, Inc. SUBJECT: Stover Avenue Sewer (Hemlock Avenue to Poplar Avenue) • Conference with MHO 's Charles Poling (909)780-1511, Ext. 2826 PROJECT NO.: 124-10 DATE: October 14, 1999 • Mr. Poling is aware that MWD has provided permission to cross their Feeder. In 'addition to the requirements presented in their letter, he advised of the following requirements 1. Ductile Iron or Steel pipe must be used. 2. Pipe must be centered over the Feeder in accordance with Health Department Standards. 3. The contractor must use mechanical or welded joints in MWD right-of-way. 4. The contractor must provide him a minimum of two (2) days notice prior .to beginning work in MWD right-of-way. 5. Hand excavation is required within two (2) feet of feeder. I advised Mr. Poling of the current schedule including potholing of the MWD Feeder. Page 1 of 1 L.D. King, Inc. 2151 Convention Center Way, Suite 100B, Ontario, CA 91764-4464 (909) 937-0200 Fax: (909) 937-0202 i The Contractor shall notify the Engineer and the appropriate regional notification center for operators of subsurface installations at least 2 working days, but not more than 14 calendar days, prior to performing any excavation or other work close to any underground pipeline, conduit, duct, wire or other structure. Regional notification centers include but are not limited to the following: Underground Service Alert-Southem Califomia (USA) 1(800)227-2600 The following utility/ municipal agencies have facilities within the limits of the subject project: AGENCY Fontana Water Company Metropolitan Water District Southern California Gas Co. Pacific -Bell CONTACT PHONE J,,�t/ masnk-nej o (Bete) 448-C ! 83 Al Krohn (909) 822-2201 Charles Poling, R.E.✓ (909) 780-1511 Ext. 2826 Alan Keseloff (909) 335-7781 Steve . Randall, ✓ Route (714) 666-5500 Administrator. Southern California Edison Fran Stewart ✓ (909) 357-6223 Co. Comcast Cable TV Paul Cyr ✓ (909) iat4738 City of Fontana Greg Bucknell (909) 350-6646 The initial written utility notification with preliminary plans was sent to utility agencies on April 15, 1999 and contact has -continued at various times since. The following utilities are expected to be relocated and/or installed prior to construction: UTILITY APPROX. LOCATION Power poles,(13 poles +/-), Various SCE Telephone poles, (16 poles +/-), Pac-Bell Fire Hydrant(s), Water Co Water meter(s) Various Fontana Sta 76+55; 36' left Sta 80+ 05; 39' left Sta 83+10; 39' left Sta 83+85; 26' left DETAILS SCE to remove/relocate and/or /install new pole.(s) behind proposed curb & gutter Pac-Bell to relocate behind proposed curb & gutter Fontana Water Co to relocate out of proposed return(s) Fontana Water Co. to relocate to behind proposed curb. Protection and/or installation of the following utility facilities will require coordination with the contractor's operations. UTILITY APPROX. LOCATION 10" Concrete H.P. MWD line Crossing Stover 500' west of Poplar DETAILS Protect in place SP-15 RECORD OF TELEPF, ENE CONVERSATION Date/r('`1 Time . i Individual h kQP.ei Cf i4A Organization 7 (am►(pm) g. Sy <15430\11 Project No. Project Title taio kkk G AG. &is er!t. Title L�12, gattvcl Location Phone No. ( Subject htg 4Gvt fJl ti 78e /( ITEMS OtSCUSSED 4v � 'J 7 i . / w gr _ -!y/ lis1. .� GG? j....geedeen. ara4( /e f �` y� tril �/� �`� , A /ntJGY� w A/te.CCIC�//�/l Wt /^y .p.LM r m. .?.Y v§F?`.,pC ,may a }}} ��.pp!' .e�� J E.� !l?. ) , ',A��` �q m9'..iNtW..�'. 41:... I ,, F , ,, . �.:j'"� �". R i f�('.�:. Lm a �i�„ • ^ ' i r �' t Y j �,W x' �Y ':ii2W Sv '., K w v A yy� Sx S 1R�'.S.,k" n �r F g - r t t a^YF , ® dd • COMMENTS OR ACTION REQUIRED WIlfreFi it Form 4.7 City of Fontana CALIFORNIA Jeff Bonadiman, Vice President Bonadiman - McCain, Inc. 280 South Lena Road P.O. Box 6444 San Bernardino, CA 92412 RE: Slover Avenue Sewer from Hemlock Avenue to Popular Avenue "Notice To Proceed" November 9, 1999 Dear Mr. Bonadiman: This letter will serve as your "Notice To Proceed" on the above referenced project based on the project field meeting held on November 8, 1999. The work completed to date on the project was verbally approved to commence at your company's request and risk until such time the utility companies could remove and relocate the existing power poles, electrical, telephone, and cable television lines. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at (909) 350-6646. Sincerely, Community Development Department - Engilieering Division cc: J. Bucknell, P.E. Civil Engineer/Special Projects City Engineer Associate Engineer/Special Projects Engineering Technician I/Special Projects Public Works Inspector (JC) Penny Paulson, Office Manager, Bonadiman - McCain, Inc. Joe Defillips, Project Superintendent, Bonadiman - McCain, Inc. (Field Delivered) www.fontana.org 8353 SIERRA AVENUE FONTANA, CALIFORNIA 92335-3528 (909) 350-7600 * recycled paper City of Fontana CALIFORNIA Jeff Bonadiman, vice President Bonadiman - McCain, Inc. 280 South Lena Road P.O. Box 6444 San Bernardino, CA 92412 RE: Slover Avenue Sewer from Hemlock Avenue to Popular Avenue MWD's Additional Requirements Dear Mr. Bonadiman: November 9, 1999 Enclosed for your use and action is a copy of L.D. King, Inc.'s memorandum dated October 14, 1999 on MWD's additional requirements to cross their water feeder transmission line on Slover Avenue. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at (909) 350-6646. Sincerely, Community Development Department Engineering Division regb J. Bucknelll, P.E. Princip Civil Engineer/Special Projects cc: City Engineer Associate Engineer/Special Projects Engineering Technician I/Special Projects Public Works Inspector (JC) Michael Thornton, P.E., L.D. King, Inc. Penny Paulson, Office Manager, Bonadiman - McCain, Inc. Joe Defillips, Project Superintendent, Bonadiman - McCain, Inc. (Field Delivered) www.fontana.org 8353 SIERRA AVENUE FONTANA, CALIFORNIA 92335-3528 (909) 350-7600 recycled paper Engineers/Planners TO: MEMORANDUM Gregory Bucknell, P.E. City of Fontana FROM: Michael Thornton L.D. King, Inc. SUBJECT: ;Stover Avenue Sewer (Hemlock Avenue to Poplar Avenue) Conference with MWD;'s Charles Poling (909) 780-1511, Ext. 2820' PROJECT NO.: 124-10 DATE: October 14, 1999 Mr. Poling is aware that MWD has provided permission to cross their Feeder. In .additionto the requirements presented in their letter, he advised of the following requirements: 1. Ductile Iron or. Steel pipe must be used. 2. Pipe must be centered over the Feeder in accordance with Health Department Standards: 3. The contractor must use mechanical or welded joints in MWD right-of-way. 4. The contractor must provide him a minimum of two (2) daysnotice prior. to beginning work. in MWD right-of-way. 5 Hand excavation is required within two (2) feet of feeder. I advised Mr. Poling of the current schedule including potholing of the MWD Feeder. Page 1 of 1 L.D. King, Inc. 2151 Convention Center Way, Suite 100B, Ontario, CA 91764-4464 (909) 937-0200 Fax: (909) 937-0202 City of Fontana CALIFORNIA Jeff Bonadiman, Vice President Bonadiman - McCain, Inc. 280 South Lena Road P.O. Box 6444 San Bernardino, CA 92412 RE: Slover Avenue Sewer from Hemlock Avenue to Popular Avenue Pipe Bedding Crushed Rock and Filter Fabric Materials November 9, 1999 Dear Mr. Bonadiman: This letter is in response to your request and letter dated October 12, 1999 to Michael P. Thornton, P.E., L.D. King, Inc. on the above referenced items, the use of the graded 3/4"crushed rock for the pipe bedding per Table 200-1.2 (A), Section -1.2 Crushed Rock and Rock Dust, Part 2 Construc `&k Materials of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction in lieu of the specified 1/2" crushed rock and deletion of the filter fabric material above the pipe bedding zone are approved. The request for the change in the crushed rock specification for the pipe bedding is a no cost change to the construction contract per our discussions. The cost for the deletion of the filter fabric above the pipe bedding zone needs to be submitted: for a contract change order deduction. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at (909) 350-6646. Sincerely, Community Development Department En:'s--ri}rg Division G gJ. Bucknell, P.E. Princi .'t Civil Engineer/Special Projects cc: City Engineer Principal Civil Engineer/CIP Associate Engineer/Special Projects Engineering Technician I/Special Projects Public Works Inspector (JC) Michael Thornton, P.E., L.D. King, Inc. John P. Leuer, G.E., LOR Geotechnical Group, Inc. Penny Paulson, Office Manager, Bonadiman - McCain, Inc. Joe Defillips, Project Superintendent, Bonadiman - McCain, Inc. (Field Delivered) www.fontana.org 8353 SIERRA AVENUE FONTANA, CALIFORNIA 92335-3528 (909) 350-7600 * recycled paper GRADE SHEET fE 10 'II- °I1 JOB NO 124'p7' 3t*RACT NO. STREET `'('Ve-r' • GRADES FROM PLAN NO. DATED GRADES FOR 2 U Vc.-f SHEET \ OF REVISED TO STAKES ARE SET 13So N Yh FB PG Grades are given from top of stakes or nails in feet and hundredths of a foot. The term sewer grades refers to flow line of pipe. - Cuts and fills are normally marked on lath for contractor's convenience only and are not to be used for construction. - When using grade stakes, contractor shall observe the following rules: (1) Three (3) consecutive points on the same rate of grade and on the same line must be used in common; (2) When a discrepancy is found, It must be reported to this office immediately, otherwise this office cannot be held responsible for any error in the grade of the finished work. All grade sheets and stakes are void after 30 days. B.M. IoZ61.-17 ELEVATION Tar Nit. 4. Fe..- %1C1 44/1 y ./Gl tt - n 7Ce C 4 05 of 1 t• i 3 +•2+.32 ✓ 8uG1,. BY L.S. • 'STAKES SET BY, COMP. BY CHKED. BY STATION ELEV. GRADE CUT FILL NOTES STATION ELEV. GRADE CUT FILL NOTES 1rwT. 10)4.435. M14* 1, (o141S •• 31.2ta 1$ 7Z 1243 ET.7,) 3o•,v 17.c.3 t-3.Z7, "` ;n+ . io.,� ,12.7$: our 102•I'°'lb , 31.3y1. la•°>4 t2.4.5. .. . foo+o3.3tt 29,740 ID17.51 12.Z5. CM), 11114+12, 425 31.S5 1g.A7 t23co. 405.3c. lvllrt$ IZ 56 • 7/J' +50 3t•7g 145.31 12.4t. rpvL. /• •;IS 32.05. 19,4z '1..4. 1,0425. 3o.* .11.57. (Z.(iV . 63foo V2.33 15,S4 1241. 4 5o - 3o,z4r 17.9) 12 4.-7 . +ZS 32.5Z . 20, 09. 1244. +75 • , 30►52 • 17.f3Z 12.70 +So.to, IoZ..io 12.4.1 .our 103 -z2 AO '.3Z.V1 .. tr3L,414;.. M/K +t 3t. • (ol + 00 .30.7v. 1 S'04 12.12 • . •I SA.ro. Io20.Zo 1 Z 31 . rh . +2 - .:. 30.24 11b. 27 • 12.51 • ' +Sc 3Z.11 loZo.3,4 r137 .i. . .. .3o104 1S:49 12 Sz, +1S. OZ.o°1 • Zo.C7 i2.3z , , . L.D. King, inc. 2151 Convention Center Way Sur:e 1303 .. pnla is v Ontarb, CA P1764 GRADE SHEET SHEET Z OF LEA TE IQ "I 1- "\ ' JOB NO. I?4. D 3 ° 1 TRACT NO. STREET Si a`icr . GRADES FROM PLAN NO GRADES FOR • DATED REVISED TO FB PG STAKES ARE SET 15' SelA Grades are given from top of stakes or nails in feet and hundredths of a foot. The term sewer grades refers to flow line of pipe. - Cuts and fills are normally marked on lath for contractor's convenience only and are not to be used for construction. - When using grade stakes, contractor shall observe the following rules: (1) Three (3) consecutive points on the same rate of grade and on the same line must be used in common; (2) When a discrepancy is found, it must be reported to this office immediately, otherwise this office cannot be held responsible for any error in the grade of the finished work. All grade sheets and stakes are void after 30 days. B.M. 1034. 3Z •Q- lab 4( tJc1"t ELEVATION COI 15 ie., BY L.S. STAKES SET BY COMP. BY CHKED. BY STATION ELEV. GRADE CUT FILL NOTES STATION ELEV. GRADE CUT FILL NOTES 64+00 S 33•' 20.79 I2.2°t i.b•FS0 ' Ss.41 23soa. 12.46 jj (1 +56.94. 1o23.10 12.54 out-. +2S 33,3t 21.01 I2.30_ IA.4400,$4 35.1.04 Io3s.4. E' .,; M/Hlf tvt 444.24 1023.20 12.44. +so 33.45 21.23 12. vt.. 4/S 35.3/ (a23.2¢ lZ.S1. -t--/s 35sz 21 • dt„ mow b'i+. o 30.10 • 1oz334 11.140. • bS-t•• o b3.513 ZI• (,S 11- go + 2 s 3 te.33 . 2 3.43 12.'1, 425 35.10 214)o 11.80 +54. 31,.50 23.51 12.gq. +So 33•13. 22.13 II SD' }�5 3443 234t 13 •n Z. +15 34,3o 22.35 I1 S . 46+0o 3te1L 2310 134,2. (ot'.-i+oo 341-0 . 22.57 12.t3 no 4.31., ✓4s24. +25 314011. 15.79 13:oa' r^ 4•2 $ 35.11 ZZ. So 12.31 • , et._'? t'S+5a 3E#.es 1.7.ss Is.ot. L.D. King, inc. 2151 Convention Center Way Suite 1003 Ontario, CA 91764 GRADE SHEET c 1' °141 JOB NO. 124 . D7 -TRACT NO. STREET SHEET 5 OF GRADES FROM PLAN NO. DATED REVISED TO FB PG GRADES FOR 1k.vT 12 " Se..,.....„,....,-- • STAKES ARE SET 1S' tea^ 1• N., . Grades are given from top of stakesor nails in feet and hundredths of a foot. The term sewer grades refers to flow line of pipe. - Cuts and fills are normally marked on lath for contractor's convenience only and are not to be used for construction. - When using grade stakes, contractor shall observe the following rules: (1) Three (3) consecutive points on the same rate of grade and on the same Tine must be used in common; (2) When a discrepancy is found, it must be reported to this office immediately, otherwise this office cannot be held responsible for any error in the grade of the finished work. All grade sheets and stakes are void after 30 days. B.M. 103 1.40' Tph-a (to°►> BY L.S. ELEVATION e,ry cR 73t"f.d•32 STAKES SET BY COMP. BY CHKED. BY, STATION ELEV. GRADE CUT FILL NOTES STATION ELEV. GRADE CUT FILL NOTES (0 o+7rj . 37•oz 23 017 . - 13: 03 70 +So 31. i05 . z4.1.3 . 13 QZ . (19 (0�1 +00 57,Zo Z4..0c0 - 13.14 +75. 37 71 24..70 13 oq . +25 31, (0 24,1S . 13.21 . 71 +00 37.44 1024.la. 13.17• +So 31.401 . 24.24 13.25 +ZS 36.D7 • 1o2.4. 3 1.24 T('a . lob +75 • 1.SZ . ••33 13,A 1Dvs.aeAk fiSo 3$•I1 • 24.10 13.2q --1-137S= — 1o24.3s 13.161 out-• +15 38.34. 24,1b 13.35. +'i•Ss- 37.57 I037.s. imiu 05. "12+00 36.41 ZS.D3 . 1$ d(. 1-11.5'8 _ .. IoZ4.4S 13.01 14 . +ZS 38.1i1 . 25•o9 13.3$. 70+00- 31.55 24.5.0 13.Dg .-i-So• 38 $5. 25.16 (3,1o9. (:-; +2-5- '37.51- 24b7 13.e2. iZt is' . 3et•az.- 25.2sy. is. iq L.D. King, .Inc. 2151 Convention Center Way Suite 1AO3a niz7,7 223a^1.' r- ( ayry r yJ.4� Ewa j'..4•>W 4 .. 'j • Ontario, CA 91764 GRADE SHEET SHEET 4. OF L..,rE 10` 1 " JOB NO. 124-p TRACT NO. STREET �oVCf. GRADES FROM PLAN NO. DATED REVISED TO FB PG GRADES FOR 1 �vT' STAKES ARE SET 151 you i-1•N . Grades are given from top of stakes or nails in feet and hundredths of a foot. The term sewer grades refers to flow line of pipe. . Cuts and fills are normally marked on lath for contractor's convenience only and are not to be used for construction. - When using grade stakes, contractor shall observe the following rules: (1) Three (3) consecutive points on the same rate of grade and on the same line must be used in common; (2) When a discrepancy is found, it must be reported to this office immediately, otherwise this office cannot be held responsible for any error in the grade of the finished work. All grade sheets and stakes are void after 30 days. B.M. ID40.z% t ^co • BY L.S. ELEVATION CO ll ai5 I CIL Ct. 5t4L-Y"...a . Frcw►o.,4 to• ' ivLvv► • ✓ STAKES SET BY COMP. BY CHKED. BY STATION ELEV. GRADE CUT FILL. NOTES STATION ELEV. GRADE CUT FILL NOTES 3..te, •M 734nv • 301.1"I ZS.2 °1 . 13.8E � �3+25 �+ �s Z5.A5 . 13.So VS•L, a<< tI10•32 — • IoZ5.34. 13.14 olAT - IS+50 31.2'1 . 25.53. r ��t — irM. +) 3 � 2 3a.Z$ io�q io2g.,e 13So CN) ,v11H % t1S 3 ^.3"5 ZS t�0 _ 1."l3 _�- +2o•3Z '— ioz5.44 I.S4 tv, . 74+00 31. , 25.t.s. 1324. i3c cep i 1-4-,A.(• N . ♦ z5 m .4 ZS. is 13 S.1 `i43. 73+18.5Z 3q.24. lc 2.5.7 g 13.sa S n►/j4 at, . +Set 39.40 25.a3 , 13 3 c.f . -1-75 31 5•T Z S 810 13 . • 40,15 icZ5J1o. 14.7. 15f% .n . ph.d t 15 +OD .4> • BPI .4Pc . ZS c'I rb ' . 1''s4 . +25 ,i.r, z1,•/g.. 13 re. ,s7 15 }so • 301*s7-.. Vo.t3 ‘g•3e1 ... L.D. King, Inc. 2151 Convention Center Way Suite - 100B S7772.$Ct 11 Mr.. ( 17.) 7 r,2 2 Ontario, CA 91764 GRADE SHEET SHEET S OF ' E to-il � • ' JOB NO. 124 1 1 (TRACT NO. STREET Io./cr. GRADES FROM PLAN NO DATED REVISED TO FB PG GRADES FOR w 12" Vc-P STAKES ARE SET 15 5 Grades are given from top of stakes or nails in feet and hundredths of a foot. The term sewer grades refers to flow line of pipe. - Cuts and fills are normally marked on lath for contractor's convenience only and are not to be used for construction. - When using grade stakes, contractor shall observe the following rules: (1) Three (3) consecutive points on the same rate of grade and on the same line must be used in common; (2) When a discrepancy is found, it must be reported to this office immediately, otherwise this office cannot be held responsible for any error in the grade of the finished work. All grade sheets and stakes are void after 30 days. B.M. lo4o 21 . 171- ELEVATION @ cp+ill • 4-I41 c„l•y 12.6"A BY L.S. STAKES SET BY COMP. BY CHKED. BY STATION ELEV. GRADE CUT FILL NOTES STATION ELEV. GRADE CUT FILL NOTES E. 14 kect,,.. c=✓4w,IO tn. I4. ,3Oc •(NJ) '754.1S VI:Si ZG. .1 13.3(o. . %b +BS3, 3el.1.-7 ' 104,,S 'Z.qc -14•-r12'..s.. o -ric. 3°1.7�. Io27 04.. mic, '`A... ►I 1.*00 3v1•j, , ZL-Zg 1b.39. o 'r3t. 40•a. Io21l-to. 13.o2 x5y 4, • 40./B 13M6 • P•.,L. +Z5 4 3OI.b.8'. 24.34 13.32 . 1 l rrwwoni-lA .4%---• (s -7(.1.$g.31, ' IoL4-•15 1Y..(A -Ko 30i •i•t• . Z (#4 3 13,za . (0 +Z$ 3°1 .-7 S 27 08 I Z 0. + 75 31.(.5 Z(G .S I 13,1* ° I'S= 4o.Olt Zi• I $ • i S'? a + 84.30 • 24,.54 13.14 0 IA r 0416 40•o(0, 2'7 ZS • IZ 18 - . -it, 1-136.30 201.0 I0301.0) . S. M/4 447 3114 1Z•4io. RoLAlet 't-10.$0 Z(44, 13•04. to 3 • . .. . :. . L.D. King, Inc. 2151 Convention Center Way Suite1008 .-1-1.R)A `!A4 2� Ft.)::2fl8 (IA^-. 5 S,S7 42C2 Ontario, CA 91764 GRADE SHEET SHEET OF '"E I -DI G1 JOB NO. 1.= °')•%01 TRACT NO. STREET •-t ves'. 5 r . GRADES FROM PLAN NO. DATED REVISED TO FB PG GRADES FOR STAKES ARE SET 15 ' S oK'-' ' • Grades are given from top of stakes br nails in feet and hundredths of a foot. The term sewer grades refers to flow line of pipe. - Cuts and fills are normally marked on lath for contractor's convenience only and are not to be used for construction. - When using grade stakes, contractor shall observe the following rules: (1) Three (3) consecutive points on the same rate of grade and on the same line must be used in common; (2) When a discrepancy is found, it must be reported to this office immediately, otherwise this office cannot be held responsible for any error in the grade of the finished work. All grade sheets and stakes are void after 30 days. B.M 1oo5'o`r ELEVATION 1040.ZI 41'rv+`L t kv-v- L BY L.S. STAKES. SET BY COMP. BY CHKED. BY STATION ELEV. GRADE CUT FILL NOTES STATION ELEV. GRADE CUT FILL NOTES '76-{-tWb. cr_,r„ /,,ka ../. 7R4o0 I,1I.gg 27• 27 1Z.1o1 Q10.30 26.(;¢ In +25 Io3A.11 21 35 12.510. 1 1-r...y 30I,1) . ZC,•LT 13.oz kS. 361.611 Z1'd2 iZ.55 . +2.5 3q.7t Zte.74- 11°I8 + -I S I o4-o, 00 21.50 I Z .s o • +So 3q.71o. V.,in I2.')4. `30+00 I040;061 Z151 1Z•SZ. 4'7$ 31.So • ZI,•°lo 1210 . +25 1040.23 2/.65. 12Sa l t; +Do 3g 79 . 21. •q l 1 Z.8Z, . Pao 4- 212.32 1027 7o 121.5 • +ZS "bei. qt,D Z1 toS I7. -75. +44,3Z I n 40.33 ...4/,.k tee, 4 5 1o3009 2'7'12 124,4. So +4G.32 1O27.6o 12,53, I03q,$5 Z1.20. 1265 . +so• 4e). 7 . Z1 °.g+ 12s3; . . 04-15 L.D. King, Inc. 2151 Convention Center Way Suite 1008- (D) 7 - 2D • Fax: (9 ) Ontario, CA 91764 GRADE SHEET I 1 °Irl JOB NO. 1.2'0-1 ?-0kTRACT NO. STREET SHEET 7 OF GRADES FROM PLAN NO. DATED REVISED TO FB PG GRADES FOR IZ m V c'' Cd STAKES ARE SET 15 ' S��'-� • Grades are given from top of stakes or.nails in feet and hundredths of a foot. The term sewer grades refers to flow line of pipe. - Cuts and fills are normally marked on lath for contractor's convenience only and are not to be used for construction. When using grade stakes, contractor shall observe the following rules: (1) Three (3) consecutive points on the same rate of grade and on the same line must be used in common; (2) When a discrepancy is found, it must be reported to this office immediately, otherwise this office cannot be held responsible for any error in the grade of the finished work. All grade sheets and stakes are void alter 30 days. B.M. ELEVATION BY L.S. STAKES SET BY COMP. BY CHKED. BY STATION ELEV. GRADE CUT FILL NOTES STATION ELEV. GRADE CUT FILL NOTES .5o+15. 4OS(Q 2s•13 1243.. a34Z5 42.11 • 31.03 • 11.74. L+o0 4O 73. Z•6.42 17,31 . . + 45 1031.30. II 1 . atnt-: i-Z5 LOIS 2$•1t 171E7 . gb3'4'So 1043.03 45.30 SN►/H 143, +.50 41.11. •2l.00 1Z.14. + 52. I4'31M4..• 11•143. INJ +75 4.1.37. :A 7.1 1208 . 415 ..43.2a. 3t.s2 11.Z(o, Bz -I-oo 41.61. Z.1 SS ' 1?.03. 541..0 43• z. 31.tet. 1t'tl. + zs .4 .64 2°t i si 11,17 Pf • 1- 5 41.1s 3 t •'let 11. a b . +so 4Z•io 30. 1v 11,154 A -So 44.ot. 3t•013 . 12.o lb . -I-1S • 423Z . 3e 45 11:87. +15 44.15 32.O.p. ta•o7 . 0 +6* • 42.55 30•74 11.S:11 ttSr.o' L4.Zq , 32.20 . 12•C01. L.D. King, Inc. 2151 Convention Center Way Suite 100B • . (t74 { Z7 32 10 • Fax: - 7. Ontario, CA 91764 GRADE SHEET n.'E )c7 '11'`'` JOB NO. l'211-'`51' TRACT NO. STREET GRADES FROM PLAN NO. DATED SHEET S OF •) REVISED GRADES FOR Z Vc- i2k STAKES ARE SET 15 FB PG s o, 5-e +t'" Grades are given from top of stakes or nails in feet and hundredths of a foot. The term sewer grades refers to flow line of pipe. - Cuts and fills are normally marked on lath for contractor's convenience only and are not to be used for construction. - When using grade stakes, contractor shall observe the following rules: (1) Three (3) consecutive points on the same rate of grade and on the same line must be used in common; (2) When a discrepancy is found, it must be reported to this office immediately, otherwise this office cannot be held responsible for any error in the grade of the finished work. All grade sheets and stakes are void after 30 days. B.M. Io40.Z1 ELEVATION I, k7 vc. LL,,.c, • P.v131c, BY L.S. STAKES SET BY COMP. BY CHKED. BY STATION ELEV. GRADE CUT FILL NOTES STATION ELEV. GRADE CUT FILL NOTES I_a..r-a-14.I C� c.' L ; s • S5+z$ 44,51 32 33. IZ,IS - $z.-+Sosz BS4(4- 12,4: ryl/r1t %o 0:-. t So • . 4 .?5 . 32 41 I2.28 0 +3fl . 1.>33$6 . 3o Lle • +1 S 44 11r . Z•(DO I-2.3t. . cat- +k2kP 45.e0 32. -.-1- 124 u . +25 45.33 32.51. 12 A ke. 1-4S.SZ SS. oo I2.4$ puY &. +So.52 45•413 4S S M/1-1*W• +52.52 1300 iz,35. 1.,0 - . • L.D. King, Inc. 2151 Convention Center Way Suite 100E i9) 937-0200 • Fax: (909) 937-0202 • Ontario, CA 91764 GRADE SHEET SHEET I OF /--s"E 10` 1Z d'e\ JOB NO 11:4'O I ' TRACT NO. STREET�vtr- GRADES FROM PLAN NO. 2-767 441 GRADES FOR DATED REVISED TO STAKES ARE SET 15 Wc.Sr FB._ PG Grades are given from top of stakes.or nails in feet and hundredths of a foot. The term sewer grades refers to flow line of pipe. - Cuts and fills are normally marked on lath for contractor's convenience only and are not to be used for construction. - When using grade stakes, contractor shall observe the following rules: (1) Three (3) consecutive points on the same rate of grade and on the same line must be used in common; (2) When a discrepancy is found, it must be reported to this office immediately, otherwise this office cannot be held responsible for any error in the grade of the finished work. All grade sheets and stakes are void after 30 days. B.M. Ic40.21 Qs-- Zo • rct' ELEVATION JmetCi BY L.S. STAKES SET BY COMP. BY CHKED. BY, STATION ELEV. GRADE CUT FILL NOTES STATION ELEV. GRADE CUT FILL NOTES 15, 60+?11,s1 A v., LA4-,..„, •Kio S.1.44, Vvt• t,‘ A ' t -`P1•}•OD d;0.33. lOZ,$•13 i ?IQ t3. tUIIH 11, .42v $O+44 3Z 0-VZ5 31 Ai Io2$.23 11 65 • Ist o -I. 'Up, 4 40,01 . 1029.Z7 11:74 , u L.;s-. 40• $Z • a • IZ,ZS Y• c• • L. I-Gt r 4,1 '5' Swl. itune, • 0 -Fw lola. t3, 0 4 2S AO a1 : IoZB.7.3 I2.14 0 -FSc. 3e1.gq loZf3 33 1I,5(Q . O 't'7 (, -31 49 10241 43 io.97. XSZ. Ci a a0143 • ~ 10.7 0 ?. 0 . L. lg. -ri 3o. 44 3z L.D. King, Inca 2151 Convention Center Way Suite 10013 (909) 937-0200 • Fax: (909) 937-0202 Ontario, CA 91764 GRADE SHEET r E i JOB NO. ' 4•1° i -"TRACT NO SHEET q OF 11 STREET CIo\/Gr' L _1rv- GRADES FROM PLAN NO. �" 1°1 1/7 DATED S - REVISED TO FB PG GRADES FOR ' ``'^''`� " STAKES ARE SET • Grades are given from top of stakes or nails in feet and hundredths of a foot. The term sewer grades refers to flow line of pipe. Cuts and fills are normally marked on lath for contractor's convenience only and are not to be used for construction. - When using grade stakes, contractor shall observe the following rules: (1) Three (3) consecutive points on the same rate of grade and on the same line must be used in common; (2) When a discrepancy is found, it must be reported to this office immediately, otherwise this office cannot be held responsible for any error in the grade of the finished work. All grade sheets and stakes are void after 30 days. Tf 11. B.M. ELEVATION g Cr i4 6. et a tot BY L.S. STAKES SET BY COMP. BY CHKED. BY STATION ELEV. GRADE CUT FILL NOTES STATION ELEV. GRADE CUT FILL NOTES 33.44 .'•4) SS+:o.SZ 45.6 4. N1i•ItI S -t 41r.3o. 33 S4 12.4'. D+S2.52 33.10 D.A.- -125 kV. 35 33. °i 2 . 124-3 . 4-)s 46 , h 33. rr 12.4Z, +3S7t, 49,31 33.15 1244. c....t- iri .4...0 451e 33.24 12.54 . • 34.'Jj IZ.00 . I +-1.. '^ ( ' 61+37.74. ctMltu 1 I . + Z S 4S.&.. 33.3 z Iz `4 . +3'17{, 4t..\ , 34'o5 12.54 , /4 . + 50 45.gt: 33.31 12.55. +So •3M1 54.ot 12-S0 +7S AS 33•4•1 1Z.SZ +/5 4('.s 3a-.11 124.1 . St3+. 0 4.-09 33•54 12.55 . o •t-o eft..(.¢ 34 2.3- tZ•41. +2$ 4G.20 33.fe2 IZ.Se +75 44/.cA g4.31 12.3e . +50 44t0,21.334.0% 1U5• +SD . 4t,-15 34.38 ►Z.S1. Kr/4.15 . 41R2171, 3318 17.51 . L.D. King, Inc. 2151 Convention Center Way Suite 100B (909) 937-0200 • Fax: (909) 937-0202 Ontario, CA 91764 6� y GRADE SHEET .'E I° " • " JOB NO. 12 4I)1 :•"/TRACT NO, GRADES FROM PLAN NO. e 7C' 'VI- DATED SHEET OF 1I STREET (1(J E/o cil, REVISED TO GRADES FOR • 12" �y'""r ' STAKES ARE SET FB PG Grades are given from top of stakes or nails in feet and hundredths of a foot. The term sewer grades refers to flow line of pipe. - Cuts and fills are normally marked on lath for contractor's convenience only and are not to be used for construction. - When using grade stakes, contractor shall observe the following rules: (1) Three (3) consecutive points on the same rate of grade and on the same Tine must be used in common; (2) When a discrepancy is found, it must be reported to this office immediately, otherwise this office cannot be held responsible for any error in the grade of the finished work. All grade sheets and stakes are void after 30 days. B.M. 4747.23. ELEVATION t1,3. G 14. h3 ►t-T+tll. . "TO 19 BY L.S. STAKES SET BY COMP. BY CHKED. BY, STATION ELEV. GRADE CUT FILL NOTES STATION ELEV. GRADE CUT FILL NOTES 'To +-75 44, :1 . 34. 44 . 12_53• 1S' 13t.•c. 4-7,z5 40.11 (0.41 15 •�1 ♦0 410 86. 34.53 IZ.33 4— A2 k ell + L 5 A1.39, ct. M/46 i3 +2S 010 34t61. 1Z.Z°I. +27 — 41541 41S. 1� • +50 .b.412. 34•69 1214. +so 41.5z 42.1.8. 4.c.4 IV -I.15 4(,.q(i. SO 7v 12.146 -1-"IS 41•43 42i8 4.ti5 . g24-Do 41o) . 14 %3 12.15 Q4+00 41.41,a 42.888 466 . • +Zs — -54.1o, 17.17 04.4 r +25 41 Si A2,g6 • 4-55 • 611k2S 41.01 35.w. (41.41) sod+,,. ►/H iZ +21 — 35.33. I1.74- 1.h • +Sc 41.Sce. 43.08• 4.4$ 12+So 41.14. 31.06 , lo•oq +75 41.125. 43. IS 4.4-7 . 1S 41.Z4. • 38 AI . 8,29. L.D. King, Inc. 2151 Convention Center Way Suite 1008 (909) 937-0200 • Fax: (909) 937-0202 Ontario, CA 91764 GRADE SHEET 'E tD.I4 I JOB NO2^4'''1 ' TRACT NO. STREET SHEET I I OF ti 11 r' r * It/ aos - /O GRADES FROM PLAN NO. DATED REVISED TO FB PG GRADES FOR fir; 12 S=STAKES ARE SET Vri 13 Grades are given from top of stakes or nails in feet and hundredths of a foot. The term sewer grades refers to flow line of pipe. - Cuts and fills are normally marked on lath for contractor's convenience only and are not to be used for construction. - When using grade stakes, contractor shall observe the following rules: (1) Three (3) consecutive points on the same rate of grade and on the same line must be used in common; (2) When a discrepancy is found, it must be reported to this office immediately, otherwise this office cannot be held responsible for any error in the grade of the finished work. All grade sheets and stakes are void after 30 days. B.M. l o441.2°I ELEVATION rtc,r10&y ep ►4 5s 'rtrT Itio FS ck "r(T 19 ✓ Vest 4q•31 Me43 VS • 2% IL -cc. . BY L.S. STAKES SET BY COMP. BY CHKED. BY 44,•3t STATION ELEV. GRADE CUT FILL NOTES STATION ELEV. GRADE CUT FILL NOTES 13' ' +S13 4123 4.5o DIA lh-Ioo I043.41 41..4, d.31 . +90 41,73 4401414. . +412 4.3.33 4.4a Iv) . +25 A.B a. 4.411.. 4ti3g. els +00 4141 43.310 .4,45 +So 48,7w. 44 3L 4'40 . J 425 41.1VA 4146. 4.41 . 4. 1s 4gn8 •,v +So 4i.s7 43 S(o 431 . + So 4S.,6 444s. 4,30 opt + 75 4143. 43 (# 4.'4 . P17+82. S. M%ii tt. ,; 116.too 47•MIS 41.7b 4'1°I . + 8 4 4 4 4.25 4a.o3. 4.3. Slo d•11. -1• S o 43 1,1 41..41G 4.25 • 3+75 .4s31 4 d,p jp 4.?S. L.D. King, Inc. 2151 Convention Center Way Suite 100B (909) 937-0200 • Fax: (909) 937-0202 Ontario, CA 91764 BIDDER'S NAME Bonadiman-McCain, Inc. PROPOSAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SLOVER AVENUE SEWER FROM HEMLOCK AVENUE TO POPLAR AVENUE BID NO. SB-04-00 TO CITY OF FONTANA, as CITY: In accordance with CITY'S "Notice Inviting Sealed Bids", the undersigned BIDDER hereby proposes to furnish all materials, equipment, tools, labor, and incidentals required for the above stated project as set forth in the Plans, Specifications, and Contract Documents therefor, and to perform all work in the manner and time prescribed therein. BIDDER declares that this proposal is based upon careful examination of the work site, Plans, Specifications, Instructions to Bidders, and Contract Documents. If this proposal is accepted for award, BIDDER agrees to enter into a contract with CITY at the unit and/or lump sum prices set forth in the following Proposal Bid Sheet. BIDDER understands that failure to enter into a contract in the mariner and time prescribed will result in forfeiture to CITY of the Bid Bond accompanying this proposal. BIDDER understands that a bid is required for the entire work, that the estimated quantities set forth in the Proposal Bid Sheet are solely for the purpose of comparing bids, and that final compensation under the contract will be based upon the actual quantities of work satisfactorily completed. It is agreed that the unit and/or lump sum prices bid include all appurtenant expenses, taxes, royalties, and fees. In the case of discrepancies in the amounts bid, unit prices shall govern over extended amounts. BIDDER certifies that it has visited the construction site and familiarized itself with local conditions under which the work is to be performed. Furthermore, BIDDER certifies that it will be responsible for incorporating into it's bid whatever contingencies which are discernible by a reasonable investigation. BIDDER agrees and acknowledges that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workman's compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and that the BIDDER will comply with such provisions of that code before commencing the performance of this Contract if awarded to it. BIDDER certifies that in all previous contracts or subcontracts, all reports which may have been due under the requirements of any Agency, State, or Federal equal employment opportunity orders have been satisfactorily filed, and that no such reports are currently outstanding. P-1 BIDDER declares that the only persons or parties interested in this proposal as principals are those named herein; that no officer, agent, or employee of the CITY is personally interested, directly or indirectly, in this proposal; that this proposal i made without connection to any other individual, firm, or corporation making a bid for the same work; and that this proposal is in all respects fair and without collusion or fraud. BIDDER certifies that affirmative action has been taken to seek out and consider disadvantaged business enterprises for those portions of the work to be subcontracted, and that such affirmative actions have been carefully documented, that said documentation is open to inspection, and that said affirmative action will remain in effect for the life of any contract awarded hereunder. Furthermore, BIDDER certifies that affirmative action will be taken to meet all equal employment opportunity requirements of the contract documents. BIDDER certifies that he possesses a Class "A" or a combination of Class "C" licenses as required to perform the work. BIDDER declares that his license number is 74600 and that the license expiration date is August 31, 2000 DATED: September 16, ,1999 BIDDER: Bonadiman-McCain, Inc. BIDDER'S ADDRESS: P 0 Box 6444 San Bernardino, CA 92412 PHONE: (909) 885-3435 FAXNO: (909) 889-3706 BY. onaai TITLE: Vice President P=2 BIDDER'S INFORMATION BIDDER certifies that the following information is true and correct: Bidder's Name: Bonadiman-McCain, Inc. Business Address: P O Box 6444 San Bernardino, CA 92412 Telephone: (909) 885-3435 Fax: (909) 889-3706 State Contractor's License No. and Class: 74600 A, B, C 2 7 Original Date Issued: 10 / 16 / 4 2 Expiration Date: 8 / 31 / 0 0 The following are the names, titles, addresses, and phone numbers of all individuals, firm members, partners, joint ventures, and/or corporate officers having a principal interest in this proposal: William W. Bonadiman, President, Jeff C. Bonadiman, Vice President Penney Paulson, Secretary, Marie L. Bonadiman, Treasurer (Address and Phone Numbers use same as Corportion.) The dates of any voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy judgments against any principal having an interest in this proposal are as follows: None All current and prior DBA'S, alias, and/or fictitious business names for any principal having an interest in this proposal are as follows: None P-3 CONTRACTOR'S LICENSING STATEMENT The undersigned certifies that bidder is licensed in accordance with the laws of the State of California providing for the registration of Contractors. Contractor's License Number: 74600 License Classification: A, B, C 2 7 Expiration Date: 8 / 31 / 0 0 Name of Individual Contractor (Print or type): Signature of Owner: Business Address: or Name of Finn: Business Address: Name: Title: Address: Name Address: Title: or Name of Corporation: Bonadiman-McCain, Inc. Business Address: P 0 Box 6444, San Bernardino, CA 92412 Corporation organized under the laws of the State of California Signature of President of Corp. William W. Bonadiman ature of Secretary of Corp. Penney Paul on September 16, 1999 Date P-4 LIST OF SUBCONTRACTORS BIDDER proposes to subcontract certain portions of the work as follows: Name Under Which Subcontractor is Licensed License No. Address of Office, Mill or Shop Percent of Total Contract Specific Description of Subcontractor °wildo.5}'fiQin5 N601S Romoland CA 2 I— Siripir Cone.. En--. 4' 1 lit ID Riverside CA %I- tAclAhole,S • ALL ITEMS OF INFORMATION REQUESTED ON THIS PAGE ARE REQUIRED. BIDDERS SHALL SPECIFY EACH SUBCONTRACTOR WHO WILL PERFORM WORK OR LABOR OR RENDER SERVICE TO THE PRIME CONTRACTOR IN AN AMOUNT IN EXCESS OF ONE HALF OF ONE PERCENT (0.5%) OF THE PRIME CONTRACTOR'S TOTAL BID. FAILURE TO LIST ALL INFORMATION AS REQUESTED ABOVE MAY RESULT IN DISQUALIFICATION OF THE BID. P-5 REFERENCES The following are the names, addresses, phone numbers and contact person for three public agencies for which BIDDER has performed similar work within the past two years: NAME/TITLE: City of Highland, Tom Crowley, Engineer ADDRESS: 26985 Base Line Street Highland, CA 92346 PHONE: (909) 864-6861 FAX (909) 862-3180 NAME/TITLE: Riverside County Flood Control, Clyde Johnson, Inspector ADDRESS: 1995 Market Street Riverside, CA 92501 PHONE: (909) 955-1288 FAX: (909) 788-9965 NAME/TITLE: City of San Bernardino, Bob Butler, Inspector ADDRESS: 300:N. "D" Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 PHONE: (909) 384-5111 FAX: (909) 384-5155 P-6 DESIGNATOR OF SURETIES The following are the names, addresses, and phone numbers for all brokers and sureties from whom BIDDER intends to procure insurance and bonds: NAME/TITLE: Dodge, --Warren & Peters ,(Tony Ruiz) ADDRESS: 430 N. Vineyard AVe., Suite 330 Ontario, CA 91764 PHONE: (909) 937-2040 FAX: (909) 937-2045 NAME/TITLE: Davis & Graeber Ins. Serv. (Gordon Hill) ADDRESS: 470 E. Highland Ave. Redlands, CA 92373 PHONE: (909) 793-2373 FAX: (909) 798-6983 NAME/TITLE: Ulico Casualty Company ADDRESS: 14726 Ramona Ave. Chino, CA 91710 • PHONE: (909) 393-4712 FAX: (909) 393-5140 P-7 BID BOND FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SLOVER AVENUE SEWER FROM HEMLOCK AVENUE TO POPLAR AVENUE BID NO. SB-04-00 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that we, the undersigned, BONADIMAN-MCCAIN, INC, (hereafter called "Principal"), and ULICO CASUALTY COMPANY , (hereafter called "Surety"), are held and firmly bound unto the CITY OF FONTANA (hereafter called "OWNER"), in the sum of TEN PERCENT OF THE TOTAL AMOUNT * dollars ($ 10% ), for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, we hereby jointly and severally bind ourselves and our successors and assigns. SIGNED this 14th day of September ,1999 . The condition of the above obligation is such that whereas the Principal has submitted to the OWNER a certain Bid, attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof, to enter into a contract in writing for the construction of the Stover Avenue (hemlock Avenue to Poplar Avenue). NOW THEREFORE, • a. If said Bid is rejected, or b. If said Bid is accepted and Principal executes and delivers a contract in the attached Agreement form within then (10) days after acceptance (properly completed in accordance with said Bid), and fiunishes insurance certificates and endorsements, bonds for faithful performance of said Contract and for the payment of all persons performing labor or furnishing materials in connection therewith, and all other required documents, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise, the same shall remain in force and effect, it being expressly understood and agreed that the liability of Surety for any and all claims hereunder shall, in no event, exceed the amount of this obligation as herein stated. For value received, Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that the obligation of said Surety and its bond shall be in no way impaired or affected by any bidding errors or extension of the time within which the OWNER may accept such Bid, and said Surety hereby waives notice of any such extension. * BID P•S (Page 1 of 3) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Principal and Surety have hereunto set their hands and seals, and such of them as are corporations have caused their corporate seals to be hereto affixed and these presents to be signed by their proper officers, on the day and year first set forth above. 1,149L— ulson Title: Secretary Corporate Seal) ATTEST: By: By: - �', C KENZIE THOMPSON Title: Title: ATTORNEY -IN -FACT PRINCIPAL: BONADIMAN-MCCAIN, INC. By: Je f"f C fonadiman Title: Vice President SURETY: ULICO CASUALTY COMPANY (Corporate Seal) IMPORTANT: Surety companies executing Bonds must possess a certificate of authority from the California Insurance Commissioner authorizing them to write surety insurance defined in Section 105 of the California Insurance Code, and if the work or project is financed, in whole or in part, with federal grant or loan funds, must also appear on the Treasury Department's most current list (Circular 570 as amended). THIS IS A REQUIRED FORM. Any claims under this bond may be addressed to: (Name and address of Surety) ULICO CASUALTY COMPANY 14726 RAMONA AVE. CHINO, CA 91710 (Name and address of agent or representative for service of process in California, if different from above) (Telephone number and FAX number of Surety and agent or representative for service of process in California) (909)393-4712 /FAX (909)393-5140 (Page 2 of 3) P-y ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) On this , before me, DATE . NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER personally appeared AME (S) OF SIGNER (S) [ ] personally known to me -O n - [ ] or proven to me on the b .: is of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/. - subscribed to the within ins ent and acknowledged to me than he/she/they executed the se in his/her/their authorized c=pacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrurent the person(s), or the entity up n behalf of which the person(s), acted, executed the instrument. Witness my hand an official seal. J I 1 SIG ATTIRE OF NOTARY NOTE: A copy of the Power of Attorney to local representatives of the bonding company must be attached hereto. P-10 (Page 3 of 3) TOTAL P.04 CALIFORNIA ALL PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of Califomia County of San Bernardino On September 14, 1999 before me Kathleen Ryan, Notary Public Personally appeared Kenzie Thompson [X] personally known to me OR [ ] proved to mo on tho ba3i3 of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that she executed the same in her authorized capacity, and that by her signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. A A A A. AA A A A AAA Y- ,y A .a KATHLEEN RYA N a �.f� COMM. #1191315 n °=>w NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA y ;13grr4 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY • r —' My Comm. Exp. Jul. 26, 2002 $'r .w wa �i.- v V 3i i� E. WITNESS my hand and official seal. OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER [ ] INDIVIDUAL [ ] CORPORATE OFFICER Title(s) [ ] PARTNERS [ ] LIMITED [ ] GENERAL [X] ATTORNEY -IN -FACT [ ] TRUSTEE(S) [ ] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR [ ] OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: Ulico Casualty Company DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT Bid Bond Title or Type of Document 3 Number of Pages September 14, 1999 Date of Document Bonadiman-McCain, Inc. Signer(s) other than Named Above ULICO CASUALTY COMPANY 111 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20001 tll El El El El POWER OF ATTORNEY 551 Know All Men By These Presents: That Ulico Casualty Company, A Delaware Corporation, having its principal office in Washington, DC, pursuant to the following resolution, adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation effective on the 28th day of January, 1993: RESOLVED: "That the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer be, and hereby is, authorized to execute Powers -of -Attorney, qualifying the attorney named in the Powers -of -Attorney to execute on behalf of the Corporation contract bonds and other related surety bonds, and to attach thereto the corporate seal of the Corporation, in the transaction of its surety business." RESOLVED: "That the signatures and attestations of such officers and the seal of the Corporation may be affixed to any such Power -of -Attorney or to any certificate relating thereto by facsimile, and any such Power -of -Attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signatures and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Corporation when so affixed with respect to any contract bond or other related surety bond to which it is attached." This Power of Attorney is signed and sealed in facsimile under and by the authority of the above Resolution. DOES HEREBY MAKE, CONSTITUTE AND APPOINT: Peter Davis, Martin Davis, Kenzie Thompson and Gordon Hill, of Davis & Graeber Insurance Services, Inc., of Redlands, in the State of California, its true and lawful Attomey(s)-in-Fact with full power and authority hereby conferred in its name, place and stead to sign, execute, acknowledge and deliver in its behalf, and as its act and deed, without power of redelegation, as follows: Contract bonds and other related surety bonds: IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED THREE MILLION ($3,000,000.00) DOLLARS; to bind Ulico Casualty Company thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such bond was signed by the duly authorized officers of Ulico Casualty Company, and all the acts of said Attorneys) -in -Fact pursuant to the authority herein given are hereby ratified and confirmed. In Witness Whereof, Ulico Casualty Company of Dover, Delaware, has caused this Power of Attorney to be signed by its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and its Corporate seal to be affixed this 1st day of July, 1998. This Power of Attorney is void unless the seal is readable, the text is in black ink, the signatures are in black ink, this notice is in red ink, and if attached to a document executed subsequent to March 31, 2001. Ulico Casualty Co District of Columbia ss: i. ' rt A. Georgine,'M v an and Chief Executive Officer On this 1st day of July, 1998, before the subscriber, a Notary Public of the District of Co mbia, duly commissioned and qualified, came Robert A. Georgine of Ulico Casualty Company to me personally known to be the individual and officer described i erein, and who executed the preceding instrument, and acknowledged the execution of the same, and being by me duly sworn, deposed and said, that he is the officer of the Company aforesaid, and that the seal affixed to the preceding instrument is the Corporate Seal of the Company, and the Corporate Seal and signature as an officer were duly affixed and subscribed to the said instrument by the authority and direction of the Corporation, and that the resolution of the Company, referred to in the preceding instrument, is now in force. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand, and affixed my official seal at Washington, DC the day and year above written. My Commission Expires March 31, 2001 CERTIFICATION I, Joseph A. Carabillo, Assistant Secretary of Ulico Casualty Company of Dover, Delaware, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of this Corporation and the Powers of Attomey issued pursuant thereto, are true and correct, and that both the Resolution and the Powers of Attorney are in full force and effect. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the corporation this 14 th ^ day of September ,199 9 . Josh A. Carabillo, Assistant Secretary UCB-102-POA1 (06/98) NON -COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) Jeff C. Bonadiman , being first duly sworn, (Name of Affiant) says that he/she is Vice President of (Title) Bonadiman-McCain, Inc. (Name of Bidder) the party making the foregoing bid; that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other bidder, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the contract of anyone interested in the proposed contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and further, that the bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid. (Signature) Jeff C. Bonadiman Vice (Typed Name) President (Title) NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME on this My Commission Expires: May 20, 2002 Penney PEN1VEY PAULSON : `"./y.�s ?"J • COMM. #11 B5361 NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA C SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY My Commission Expires May 30, 2002 CALIFORNIA 16th day of September otary Public Paulson,Notary Public P-11 , 19 99 CERTIFICATION OF NON-DISCRIMINATION BY CONTRACTORS Labor Code Section 1735 requires that no discrimination be made in the employment of persons upon public works because of the race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, medical condition, marital status or sex of such persons, except as provided in Government Code Section 12940. The firm listed below certifies that it does not discriminate in its employment with regard to the factors set forth in Labor Code Section 1735; that it is in compliance with all federal, state and local directives and executive orders regarding non-discrimination in employment; and that it agrees to demonstrate positively and aggressively the principle of equal employment opportunity in employment. We agree specifically: 1. To establish or observe employment policies which affirmatively promote opportunities for minority persons at all job levels. 2. To communicate this policy to all persons concerned, including all company employees, outside recruiting services, especially those serving minority communities, and to the minority communities at large. 3. To take affirmative steps to hire minority employees within the company. FIRM: Bonadiman-McCain, Inc. TITLE OF PERSON SIGNING: Vice Presiden SIGNATURE: X Cam- Je nadiman DAoE: September 16, 1999 Please include any additional information available regarding equal opportunity employment programs now in effect within your company. Bonadiman-McCain, Inc. has a company Affirmative Action Policy. P-12 PROPOSAL BID SHEET FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SLOVER AVENUE SEWER FROM HEMLOCK AVENUE TO POPLAR AVENUE BID NO. SB-04-00 Item No. Description 1 Clearing and Grubbing 2. Traffic Control, Signing and Striping 3. Potholing 4. 12" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer 5. 8" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer 6. 8" Class 250 Ductile Iron Pipe Sewer Estimate Quantity N/A N/A Unit Unit Amount Price Total Amount LS N/A Iq 1 330- LS N/A 30 /370 35 EA 460— i 5,7ssc 3090 LF 69 _ 658 LF 161 7. Sewer Manhole per City of Fontana Standard Detail No. 112 11 8. Sewer Manhole with flat top entry shaft per City of Fontana Standard . Detail No. 112 9. Connection to existing Sewer Manhole per Detail 'A', Sheet No. 6, including manhole base reconstruction and related work. 10. 6" Sewer lateral per City of Fontana Standard Nos. 125, 125A and 125B. 11. Temporary Asphalt Concrete Pavement for 12' Travel Lane and Driveways (See Construction Note No. 8) 3 N/A 32 LF 1'8Z, 3to- tee - gZ,7no- 4S - EA 2,9o03o, ?co EA 2`5SO - -, 6 50 LS N/A /000 EA $SZZoi 525 TONS Z1,000 P-13 Item Description Estimate Unit Unit Total No. Quantity„ Amount Price Amount 12. Permanent Asphalt Concrete Pavement (Hemlock Avenue) 100 TONS Zd '$,00Q 13. Class 2 Aggregate Base 50 ' CY `/15 TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID (Sum of Bid Items 1 through 1 ): "11WitAcLQd INi-1•12-' u$C rd itioO kC( CVAA IT i re- &Mci no too (Word ) Dollars $ 3q J,� (Figures) P-14 PROPOSAL BID SHEET FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SLOVER AVENUE SEWER FROM HEMLOCK AVENUE TO POPLAR AVENUE BID NO. SB-04-00 NOTE: The estimated quantities listed in the Proposal Bid Sheet(s) are supplied to give an indication of the general scope of the work, but the accuracy of these figures is not guaranteed and the bidder shall make his own estimates from the drawings. In case of a variation between the unit price and the totals shown by the bidder, the unit price will be considered to be the bid. The Contractor shall perform, with its own organization, contract work amounting to at least 50 percent of the Contract Price, except that any designated "Specialty Items" may be performed by subcontract and the amount of any such "Specialty Items" so performed may be deducted from the Contract Price before computing the amount of work required to be performed by the Contractor with its own organization. The CITY reserves the right to reject any and or all bids, or to waive any information on any one or all bids received. The CITY specifically reserves the right to delete, reduce all or any portion of the work at any time prior to authorization to proceed with this portion of work. BIDDER'S NAME: TELEPHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: Bonadiman-McCain, Inc. (909) 885-3435 (909) 889-3706 P-15 PROPOSAL IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BIDDER executes and submits this proposal with the names, titles, hands, and seals of all forenamed principals this 16 tltlay of Sept . , 19 9 a BIDDER Bonadiman-McCain Inc 1 Jeff C. Bonadiman, Vice President William W. Bonadiman, President Subscribed and sworn to this 16th day of September , 199 a NOTARY PUBLIC Penney Paulson By Penne 'aulso Title Notary Public, Secretary '• CPENNEVPAULSON COMM. #1185361 z , .► NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA 3 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY My Commission Expires May 30, 2002 The undersigned representative of the CITY acknowledges that this proposal was received and opened at the time and in the place specified, and that it was accompanied by the required guarantee in the amount of at least ten percent (10%) of the total bid. By Title P-16 Addendum No. Addendum No. Addendum No. Addendum No. Addendum No. Addendum No. Addendum No. Addendum No. PROPOSAL BID SHEET FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SLOVER AVENUE SEWER FROM HEMLOCK AVENUE TO POPLAR AVENUE BID NO. SB-04-00 ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGMENT I have received the Addendums listed below: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: BIDDER'S NAME: Bonadiman-McCain, Inc. NAME/TITLE: SIGNATURE: TELEPHONE NO.: FAX NO.: Jeff C. Bonadiman, Vice Pre ent (909) 885-3435 (909) 889-3706 P-17 CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT - Protect: (•-•t==.VEe Ave:. / r Day Date: 1 l -.9 -99 M c W Th F S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start . Stop: Hours - Item No. (-i IMA. r -� Contractor MC. C • lot MM) 82� Aim] • Remarks (reason for idleness or other remarks) EQUIPMENT AND 1 OR LABOR: No. Of Equipment No. 0f Men Description (0f Equipment or Labor) / G,e'eprzo.t. 2 dIr-r 40 / -, 1/. S / ✓72r/ S / 4340 Le:.-,.-' . / ,�, 1fi gm, 61 n'c tL �i c� - �. vv % 1 i - 9 - ei9_ .-r (• 15 �n I1- A-9 Contractor PROJECT: CONTRACTOR: CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT ,,..(2,94if/1. 0-e.910.4)-eA U f • / • a C. 1 (.., EQUIPMENT AND/OR LABOR: EQUIPMENT NO. NO. OF MEN r DESCRIPTION (Of Equipment or Labor) HOURS ITEM NO. Report No. Day Date 1 6 f 9R M T W T CO S S Circle Day Shift Hours: Start 7•' 66 Stop 35 3c5 WEATHER g 436, e4r LaAbf2. f 00Aa4.4/t 'Pia a 5ra1 pet , dead ) eje Get 7 7 /7 AA ;7 , * e-M zY S<<� • REMARKS (Reason for Idleness or Other Remarks) cretZcii,4 l 1 p# f8. tee WS! Aie:664 Az_eazy )1-11 X141.-t 5/E 00 1-26,e-ReA. �- £ -41 fe-err Oit <� Lzcc�4 i � 4 r tae CONTRACTOR INSPECTOR CITY OF FONTANA • • Report No. Day PROJECT: CONTRACTOR: Date / / 77 / INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT M T W F S S Circle Day Shift Hours: Start 7 4d Stop 3 = 30 dio-e•LeA ae.mg�9 adze, C� EQUIPMENT AND/OR LABOR: EQUIPMENT NO. NO. OF MEN Z DESCRIPTION (Of Equipment or Labor) ibe-tfe-Atlts;AP,pidoa. 1 HOURS ITEM NO. WEATHER REMARKS (Reason for Idleness or Other Remarks) 9,4_-(ze • c,p-per_rcet--; l t 1 c4-� ,cost/fie g e,gvt-ry a 2 /Pea • 6, yQ Q4)4 ALAISe-e, K v/J.(01 nfir • ., &<fittL tyLk/eP1 b YX® nA 1..e.)O A4cV) d/1 9-14 11eA A o4 44244. u ( lae n.v ei1tP.S_t��% tefz C 41 l( Q/fSLi .f3',41 CONTRACTOR INSPECTOR PROJECT: CONTRACTOR: CITY OF FONTANA • INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT ,� �I A de Le5e/1 P 4/fie. EQUIPMENT AND/OR LABOR: EQUIPMENT NO. NO. OF MEN DESCRIPTION (Of Equipment or Labor) HOURS ITEM NO. • Report No. Day Date /1/3/9q M T J T F S S Circle Day Shift Hours: Start Stop (, k&G / oF7 WEATHER REMARKS (Reason for Idleness or Other Remarks) r // /3an A-b/014 1)-//tf5 741A c) k3.2 L.4.4 e 1.44-e 1 ,,!a&)E RVco rig. -LA�YI �1lliC�vCJ[ Al J �LJ V i _,e, Mace, t A Avy1 s ••yy))-- y �n e, a2cs7 de-4144- V.LA , ( A i, �� �k �c� wit . )A , 146.4 �n u '.fie l' (� eA' /. ti _,a...L 4 1 `.c1 ' ice♦_' .� Ala •r 4 .• r��. iv �/ .d •�r..j. Ao ca � 0 ..� „/.e..44 CI CONTRACTOR CITY OF FONTANA Report No. Day PROJECT: CONTRACTOR: INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT Oceie_A.51w_ 1, .4 . M /' f, AAi� nl .;.,(- EQUIPMENT AND/OR LABOR: EQUIPMENT NO. NO. OF MEN 1 DESCRIPTION (Of Equipment or Labor) 4-he0#34r4 Date 10199 M T O T F S S Circle Day Shift Hours: Start 4I 'Stop 3! 3 CP, E . O HOURS ITEM NO. WEATHER AsHilacr fec /(Ee- o 98°ill REMARKS (Reason for Idleness or Other Remarks) ?6„.e6-F, (it 105 n/wM/1 epizi -7E .. �s� ./Lo v✓ O ! . `� ? �' 4, r .1��.,�rt��I X i '`1.1G4.41P// s& / 6 Im cE%Si��Prl9,as irz 4�1.ae itbil„(345e., ��IG�c 6,14_ m5fir 2c g bJ� J ( _I3wIX CONTRACTOR TITLE elefF:‘'' 64-4 INSPECTOR CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT Project Contractor 6 - A D+ Milo-) EQUIPMENT AND/OR LABOR: EQUIPMT. NO. 1 1 1 NO. OF MEN 1 DESCRIPTION (Of Equipment or Labor) 446 C - - Mo-rar (a -tom,. r)t.) rt-tp k 5 3 3 8 Report No. Day Date 11 -- I�IO T. W T F S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start 7 aarviA Stop 3.'Bet,�..,_. HOURS - ITEM NO. WEATHER 1.�teii dlnt S . REMARKS (Reason for idleness or other remarks) QfJ fr t0+`1 per c v'T r- 14. • S E2C GA tJ A-r , 4, e-> c' 'C r - J Rc 4/ r- o P c_-r . -ire, C c . LjoTE.. eY•S -o -t -Cr) -rrz-a Ir. loco' . (^ . rv'r tc A CC70' T14p r- -rr Ac-rDt� CA T gcf.) ^j Trot S wtt_L e r "t' . 'PTS?,d t C_ - roJyc i yyNa>4ac)cq. r +-ter Ca....AAr c_e • Contractor Title 12J92 JT/ab CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT - Protect: c3U r Repo. Day Date: IU-29 —99 M T W Th © S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start SArv-, Stop: S13A.L r• Hours - Item No. (1P.AA r 1 , . ,-. Contractor. M-1,;.; • A. b I nrua►.a e L V3I,._ lip • ad C Remarks (reason for idleness or other remarks) Ay,o. L,A. c :),..t5 • EQUIPMENT AND 10R LABOR: No. 0f Equipment No. 0f Men Description (0f Equipment or Labor) i „}a., a c —r- t . N , L cs .a►�.a� TL C— � r.1 et rlF r-,F • T12.3 c lc Q,k„, tT� r Contractor Title lnspe Sheet Of CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT - Pro ect: �10� /emu . J Repo Day Date: l0 - 2S - 99 MTW (T F S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start Stop: Hours - Item No. .r (sra/ Contractor. MCC /A.'Di MA NI E . _ 8s o tV . Remarks (reason for idleness or other remarks) AND 10R LABOR: _EQUIPMENT No. Of Equipment No. Of Men Description Of Equipment or Labor) / L..y / b—,%07"./ / G,,fj494.---- /44bTe1/E4�;:.E►.-- AZ,// r Contractor Title o 1 i.a 1.59p 1 TES Sheet Of CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT - Pro)ect: lib R Day � Date: 117 - Z "(^ c1 9 M T4 Th F S S Circle Day ShiftHours Start , Stop: Hours - Item No. ( Q-/ Contractor: S.• o t t%-1.A+..5 ! ,/t.........„..)_ I UC r Remarks (reason for Idleness or other remarks) EQUIPMENT AND 1 OR LABOR: No. Of Equipment No. Of Men Description (Of Equipment or Labor) -- s ,a-5 — I� S c < Lase' ��c� � �C - -ee=fte&_9 S%TC� erN,t<" taL e l r� L-fs' Contractor Title Inspec r Sheet Of CITY OF FONTANA • •Fat ►AF m4TTea-.4' aca pa563 Report No. Day Date I O/c& 1 / r INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT M c w T F SS Circle Day Shift Hours: Start Stop HOURS ITEM NO. PROJECT: UP<MA L' Q, Lk)) tatIrv! (3".�..' J2Q. CONTRACTOR: 0 ,✓i.0.41 4;0-.44— EQUIPMENT AND/OR LABOR: EQUIPMENT NO. NO. OF MEN DESCRIPTION (Of Equipment or Labor) WEATHER REMARKS (Reason for Idleness or Other Remarks) OL&F Sec 69,4yte ' ry io 2:c)#( Zetv i&e.A 08c69 .Ae r lm-efLe Syr oft . ,1 9A k 4 Sc AaWI& f 0-aA ��, op�..9r.v 4t i g'/c!} W4Av 1 r.J 16"15-q?, CONTRACTOR INSPECTOR PROJECT: CONTRACTOR: CITY OF FONTANA • FP J,JP sem4T,a4v2.c. Pa.v2pose5 Report No. Day Date Aey, 679q INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT Q T W/ T F SS Circle Day 7 Shift Hours: Start Stop 3. 36 IQN/P:ithz,vLiyA ?Limi;a4:tA Atii. /��91L�c�vly/cF�(i /�7L�lk��rL EQUIPMENT AND/OR LABOR: EQUIPMENT NO. �a o� NO, OF MEN 1 1 1 DESCRIPTION (Of Equipment or Labor) 93a Le,A.DE8. LJ,Trm-eK 8 HOURS ITEM NO. L WEATHER REMARKS (Reason for Idleness or Other Remarks) /y �s4U,oOo� A) JeAz.067.44 cS163g4 n �4, V i2A .1 0j a � A 5p44 - e, Thi' . CONTRACTOR CITY OF FONTANA • Re ort No. Day Date: INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT M T W Th F S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start Stop: - Protect: Hours • Item No. eath Contractor. XOUIPMENT AND I OR LABOR: No. Of Equipment No. Of Men Description Of Equipment or Labor) Remarks (reason for Idleness or other remarks) A N —fie wa_ r —t'f }Q�y fir- ,f e 9 — 7 - 9' (Jt-iaa �L30 iv • n-1.1(; eS-cam. , 'i-s,r -i = sue,- 5 Con factor e Sheet Of CITY OF FONTANA • INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT •ReportNo. Day Date: q . 9 - 9 9 M T W6a-DF S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start , (3 __ Stop: .51ck5v.,r %, VS Hours -Item No. ._ r L c Contractor. y&4r ( *::*s -r . - .p Remarks (reason for Idleness or other remarks) EgUIPMENT AND I OR LABOR No. Of Equipment No. 0f Men Description (0f Equipment or Labor) Contractor •Z+- C -A. r'9�_ i t7A1�L� r- -CS-ts .a. .ct c �► a br. e s _ � pit s�E t� —rTi 1rt �C- -�Lr< -r' — .� P 35QCJ 4 14-'-1 c lc .j- 1-2 1F7 l_ 1r--r oN r:' -1124.rt1_ ir In-o- re. ` s . Title Inspecto Sheet of CITY OF FONTANA - • INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT - Protect .` Contractor. Oteport No. Day Date: a M T W( F S S Circle Day SWft Hours Start Stop: Hours - Item No. Weather EQUIPMENT AND I OR LABOR: No. Of Equipment No. Of Men Description (Of Equipment or Labor) Remarks (reason for idleness or other remarks) A-1ce. 9-7-k? 109,0 c-f t9-r-- CITY OF FONTANA _.#Z4.. V. cam/ . a; tr-.n.0%- 1 ( ©* !—,c'SCQ INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT ITU Po�ecr Rey6rt No. Day, Date: g - 9 - 9 4 M T WC' S S Circle Day Shltt Hours Start I p Stop: • S1� xc,r % , Hours - Item No. (-�'`' k-Irie S Contractor. Orly (c:vas--r . . • Remarks (reason for idleness or other remarks) 1 UIPMENT AND I OR LABOR No. Of Equipment No.af Men Description (0tEquipment orLabor) C.A.. 1N� r- TG►,tr� :St ANTItTar. e �. c. cam N..� l X-r' •- t� ,A. P 1 w j • t2 . 4 - tZ .a __At,rLc-,.ct y , - sj l� d"). dP hei ` t0,) Gtz- el + T —t—P G bt... . Rez440. a Title LOCIIIG From the Desk of ADAM R. WEISTER En; 'veering Assistant PROJECT NOTES Date/Time: 9/13/99 Project: Slover Avenue Sewers To: Job Number: 124-05 File Copy: Subject: Permission to cross MWD's feeder line with our sewer. a k.l.,• S.N:3sE k r.C;Et DIRECTIONS I spoke with Maria Soto, (213) 217-7566, at the Metropolitan Water District and she informed me that they have sent the letter of permission and that we ;should receive it within the next couple of days. She advised that the letter contained various construction requirements. d?, 4: ).,1,E- 4 Adam R. Weister • Date: 9/13/99 L. b. KING, INC., 2151 Convention Center Way, Suite 100B, Ontario, California 91764 Phone: (909) 937-0200 so Fax: (909) 937-0202 THE METROPOLITAN WATER D/STR/CT Of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Mr. Terry M. Renner. Page 2 SEP 0 9 1999 We request that a stipulation be added to your plans or specifications to notify Mr. Charles Poling of our Operations Maintenance Branch, telephone (909) 780-1511, extension 2826, at least two working days (Monday through Thursday) prior to starting any work in the vicinity of our facilities and easement, including potholing. Provided that the above comments and requirements are complied with, your plans are acceptable to Metropolitan. We are returning one print each of Sheets 5 and 6 of your plans, stamped "REVIEWED — NO CORRECTIONS NOTED." We advise you that this response is based upon information available to the Metropolitan Water District which was prepared by or on behalf of Metropolitan for general record purposes only. Such information may not be sufficiently detailed or accurate for your purposes. No warranty of any kind, either express or implied, is attached to the information herein conveyed as to its accuracy, and no inference should be drawn from Metropolitan's failure to comment on any aspect of your project. You are therefore cautioned to make: such surveys and other field investigations as you may deem prudent to assure yourself that any plans for your project are correct. For any further correspondence with Metropolitan relating toYthis project, please make reference to the MWD Substructures Job Number shown in the upper right-hand corner of the first page of this letter. Should you require any additional information, please contact Mr. Vijay Bal, telephone (213) 217-7311. Very truly yours, t. ••GG�( Marko Buntich Engineering Technician III - Substructures Section MB/VHB/km D0C#: 1577sloverl Enclosures (2) MWD METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Office of the General Manager SEP 0 9 1999 Your Job No. 124-05 MWD Upper Feeder Sta. 855+00 to 855+50 Substr. Job No. 2002-99-028 Mr. Terry M. Renner Assistant Engineer L. D. King, Inc. 2151 Convention Center Way Suite 100B Ontario, CA 91764-4464 Dear Mr. Renner: Slover Avenue Sewer Thank you for your letter dated August 17, 1999, and three prints each of your preliminary plans, Drawing Np. 2767, Sheets 5 and 6 of 8, for the proposed sewer line iinprovements in Slover Avenue between Hemlock and Poplar Avenues in the City of Fontana. The locations of our 140-inch-inside-diameter precast concrete Upper Feeder pipeline and 40-foot-wide permanent easement as shown on Sheets 5 and 6 appear to be generally in agreement with our records. No conflict is indicated between the proposed 8-inch sewer line and our pipeline since Sheet 5 of your plans indicates that the sewer line will cross over our pipeline with approximately one foot of vertical clearance. However, we request that our pipeline be uncovered at this crossing, under Metropolitan's supervision, and its actual elevation be established based on the sewer line datum. Please send us a copy of data obtained. Also, please note that only hand equipment may be used when excavating within two feet of our pipeline. The construction of the sewer line should conform with the County Health Code Ordinance as it relates to installation in the vicinity of pressure water lines. Our pipeline within the limits of this project is adequate for AASHTO H-20 loading. If the contractor plans to use any equipment over our pipeline which will impose loads greater than AASHTO H-20, it will be necessary to submit the specifications of such equipment for our review and written approval at least two weeks prior to its use. 700 N. Alameda Street. Los Angeles, California 90012 • Mailing address: Box 54153, Los Angeles, California 90054-0153 • Telephone (213) 217-6000 nG ngineers/Planners;,: a Surveyors=' August 17, 1999 METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT Civil Engineering, Substructures Division P.O. Box 54153 Terminal Annex Los Angeles, CA 90054 Subject: City of Fontana — Slover Avenue Sewer M.W.D. Crossing Gentlemen: Job Number: 124-05 We, are currently designing a sewer along Slover Avenue between Poplar Avenue and Hemlock Avenue, for the City of Fontana. On behalf of the City of Fontana, we request permission to cross over your 144" M.W.D. Upper Feeder line. We ' are proposing to cross over the top of your facility with an 8" sewer line, along Slover Avenue between Elm; Avenue and Poplar Avenue. We have, designed the proposed sewer in accordance with your Guidelines for Development in the Area of Facilities, Fee Properties, and / or Easements of The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. Attached are three sets drawings. We have highlighted your facility and request that you provide written permission to allow us to cross your facility:- We have included a copy of your guidelines in the Construction Specifications to insure that the contractor will install the proposed sewer in accordance with all M.W.D. requirements. If you have any questions or need additional information, please advise. Sincerely, Q, TERRY 1VI. RENNER Assistant Engineer TMR:tmr Attachments cc: Gregory Bucknell L.D. King, Inc. 2151 Convention Center Way, Suite 100, Ontario, CA 91764-4464 (909) 937-0200 Fax: (909) 937-0202 MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Gregory Bucknell, P.E. CITY OF FONTANA FROM: Mr. Adam R. Weister LD KING, INC. SUBJECT: Meet and mark with the representatives of each utility agency. PROJECT NO.: 124-05 DATE: July 7, 1999 A. Meeting Attendance: 1. Utility Agencies a. Inland Empire Utilities Agency - Did not show, no underground utilities in this reach. b. Comcast Cablevision — Inland Empire - Did not show, there is no conflict with their underground utilities in this reach. City of Fontana - Did not show, no further information was needed.... d. Fontana Water Company - Al Crohn, (909) 822-2201 e Marygold Mutual Water Company - Did not show, no underground utilities in this reach. f. Metropolitan Water District - Ray Rojas, (909) 780-1511 g. Pacific Bell - Did not show, was marked on a later date. h. The Gas Company - Bob Peters, (909) 423-1391 i. Santa Fe Pacific Pipeline, L.P. (Kindermorgan Energy Partners) - Did not show, no underground utilities in this reach. j. UTI — Locating for SC Edison - Gabriel Gonzalez, (909) 715-4665 k. West San Bernardino County Water - Did not show, no underground utilities in this reach. ngineers/Planners, :emu xSurveyors; Richard Fleener V.P iPlanning �'�� �� C•Steven Stapleton Weand Development. June 7, 1999 Mr. Marco Buntich METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT P.O. Box 54153 Terminal Annex Los Angeles, CA 90054 Job Number: 124-05 Subject: UTILITY LOCATION Dear Mr. Buntich: This is our written request to obtain information on any utilities located within the below referenced area in the City of Fontana. Location: Slover Avenue, from Calabash Avenue to Sierra Avenue. Calabash Avenue,Cherry Avenue and Citrus Avenue, from Slover Avenue to Jurupa Avenue. THOMAS GUIDE PAGE: pg. 604 and 644 Enclosed, for your use, is a copy of the 1998 San Bernardino/Riverside Counties Thomas Guide Pages 604 and 644 with the specific area "highlighted" for your reference. We are designing a sewer main along the above mentioned streets for the City of Fontana. If you could please provide this information as soon as possible, it would be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions or need additional information, please let me know. Sincerely, /44110 o? ADAM R. WEISTER Assistant Engineer Enclosures L.D. King, Inc. 2151 Convention Center Way, Suite 100, Ontario, CA 91764-4464 (909) 937-0200 Fax: (909) 937-0202 FINAL CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF SLOVER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS IN AND NEAR FONTANA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA JUNE 1999 Prepared For San Bernardino County Transportation/Flood Control Department • Environmental Management Division 825 E. 3rd Street, Room 127 San Bernardino, California 92415-0835 Prepared By Cary D. Cotterman and Evelyn N. Chandler Tetra Tech, Inc. 348 W. Hospitality Lane, Suite 300 San Bernardino, California 92408 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 1 3.0 CULTURAL BACKGROUND 1 3.1 Prehistory 1 3.1.1 Serrano 4 3.1.2 Gabrielino 5 3.1.3 Cahuilla 6 3.2 History 7 4.0 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS 12 5.0 METHODS 13 6.0 RESULTS 14 6.1 Archaeological Resources 14 6.2 Architectural Resources 14 14882 Slover Avenue (commercial building) 16 14798 Slover Avenue (Saint Mary's Church) 16 15803 Slover Avenue (house with stone wall) 16 Gasoline station feature 20 15922 Slover Avenue (house with chicken coop) 20 16696 Slover Avenue (Spanish Colonial Revival house) 22 6.3 Eucalyptus Tree Windbreak 22 7.0 CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS 22 7.1 Archaeological Resources 22 7.2 Architectural Resources 24 14882 Slover Avenue (commercial building) 24 14798 Slover Avenue (Saint Mary's Church) 25 15803 Slover Avenue (house with stone wall) 25 Gasoline station feature 25 House with chicken coop and Spanish Colonial Revival house 26 7.3 Eucalyptus Tree Windbreak 27 8.0 REFERENCES 28 9.0 LIST OF PREPARERS 32 APPENDIX A A-1 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Location of Slover Avenue Project Area, San Bernardino County, California 2 Figure 2 Project Area, Slover Avenue, San Bernardino County, California 3 Figure 3 Commercial Building (ca. 1928), 14882 Slover Avenue. View to West. 17 Figure 4 Saint Mary's Church (1939) and Shrine, 14798 Slover Avenue. View to Northwest18 Figure 5 House and Stone Wall (ca. 1927), 15803 Slover Avenue. View to South. 19 Figure 6 House and Chicken Coop (ca. 1927), 15922 Slover Avenue. Views to Northwest. 21 Figure 7 House (ca. 1929), 16696 Slover Avenue. View to Southwest 23 TABLE Table 1 Historic -Age Buildings Recorded on Slover Avenue between Sierra and Cherry Avenues 15 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF SLOVER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS IN AND NEAR FONTANA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FINAL 1.0 INTRODUCTION The County of San Bernardino is planning to replace and widen the existing pavement and to construct curbs, gutters, and associated drainage facilities along approximately 3 miles of Slover Avenue between Sierra Avenue on the east and Cherry Avenue on the west in the City of Fontana and in unincorporated areas of San Bernardino County, California (Figure 1). The County's right-of-way extends 52 feet from the road's center line; however, widening will only extend a maximum of 40 feet from the center line. Slover Avenue currently varies in width, therefore ground -disturbing activities associated with improvements may extend as little as 1 foot or as far as 22 feet beyond the current edges of the road. Due to the potential for effects to cultural resources within the project area, a review of materials obtained through a cultural resources record search was conducted, followed by archival research and a field survey. The purpose of this report is to provide information on the environmental setting and cultural background of the project area, the findings of previous cultural resources investigations, and the methodology and results of the field survey. Recommendations for further work are also provided. 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The project area is located at an elevation of between approximately 1,005 and 1,090 feet, 8 miles south of the mouth of Lytle Creek Canyon on the Lytle Creek alluvial plain, a major geomorphic feature of the western San Bernardino Valley (Figure 2). Natural vegetation in the project area consisted of moderately dense coastal sage scrub that included chamise, scrub oak, white and black sage, and grasses. Fauna included jackrabbits, cottontail rabbits, small rodents, squirrels, coyotes, snakes, lizards, and numerous bird species (Clark 1978/1979). Today the area is urbanized, and no native habitat remains. Vegetation consists of eucalyptus trees planted in the early 20th century as windbreaks for agricultural fields, introduced ornamental trees and shrubs, remnant trees from citrus and olive groves, and weeds. 3.0 CULTURAL BACKGROUND 3.1 Prehistory Ethnographic accounts of Native Americans indicate that three groups, the Serrano, Gabrielino, and possibly Cahuilla, may have occupied or utilized the region that includes the project area. The predominant Tetra Tech, Inc. 1 Redlands • • • Source: TOPO! Wildflower Productions 1996. +.:, ?': 'ti =� _' 'A• - -_ -' r••i{ } } .` ;1 .� r Los Angeles and Surrounding Recreational Areas+ tr.�.ti j`. • •'-,�'+.•y.L%'�; ...-.-tom. •tw-•.-•••.-. i. i-'O_'..e=• t .t'. �s �`�3 4 - 74 .. r17,44:4.. #.7`l' Figure 1 Location of Slover Avenue Project Area, San Bernardino County, California • of. sem- U• 1' J ! 1 i I —;�JL _ham'• 1 992� r T ANA' . • it• .A VL' lr R {i N ,: • 1 IW 1_ u 938 JURUPA I • L • Welt' N - • • {' • �w:• Q Q' 1_ ... JIII 3 ca. 1927 House with ca. 1927 -� House with r--,. Chicken Coop RaC1o•-— __ Stone Wall ' • 11' i:' . . _ �i'� . I- .1: - ..... , : u 1 9 Ih -,. • N_ _ Avr 1' - — _ =' :� - ___�° 1' • 11 R851ii1 Well 99�1 iOII I' i IA "/G.•J - ' 11 _ Well • vile TC.'- ` /;— f._.!_ \ %I rt- Figure 2 e S4wage Project Area, Slover Avenue, San Bernardino County, California • .;11.: 04": 1 r1209 Re41. Park ' U ca. 1929 Spanish Colonial Revival House f ;.tip• •kws6._—. = .-1 `.`\ Y: t. it CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF SLOVER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS IN AND NEAR FONTANA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FINAL Native American presence in the area, however, was most likely Serrano. When Spanish explorers and settlers arrived in the western San Bernardino Valley in the late 18th century, both the Gabrielino and Serrano were present (Johnston 1965; Bean and Smith 1978a, 1978b). Movements of native peoples and conflicting accounts during historic times have confused the issue of exact territorial limits (Strong 1929, Kroeber 1925). 3.1.1 Serrano The Serrano occupied an area in the San Bernardino Mountains extending west to Cajon Pass, north to present-day Victorville, east as far as Twentynine Palms, and south to Yucaipa Valley (Bean and Smith 1978b; Earle 1997; Earle et al. 1997). The name "Serrano" is a Spanish word meaning "mountaineer" that has also been used to name a group of languages in the Takic family, which included the languages of the Gabrielino and Cahuilla (Bean and Smith 1978b). Like their neighbors, the Serrano were mainly hunters and gatherers, and they occasionally fished. Hunted game included mountain sheep, deer, antelope, rabbits, small rodents, and various birds, particularly quail. Vegetable staples consisted of acorns, pinon nuts, bulbs and tubers, shoots and roots, berries, and cacti. Desert and valley groups traveled annually into the foothills to trade foodstuffs with their kindred for products not available in the lowlands (Bean and Smith 1978b). Serrano houses had circular bases and were constructed of poles with a covering of bark and tule mats to make them waterproof. Ramadas, or flat -roofed, open -sided shade structures, were also built (Bean and Smith 1978b). Settlement was usually in small villages near water sources. The Serrano were loosely organized patrilineally, and associated themselves with either the Wild Cat or the Coyote moiety or clan. Like many southern California Indians, the Serrano practiced cremation up until Spanish contact. By 1834, most of the Serrano were relocated to Spanish missions, and today live either on the Morongo or San Manuel reservations (Bean and Smith 1978b). A conservative estimate of Serrano speakers today is two, while the liberal estimate is eight (Hinton and Montijo 1993/1994). According to Hinton and Montijo (1993/1994), there is a community interest among the Serrano in reviving their language. Tetra Tech, Inc. 4 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF SLOVER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS IN AND NEAR FONTANA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FINAL 3.1.2 Gabrielino Ethnographic evidence indicates that at the time of contact with Europeans, the Gabrielino were the main occupants of the Los Angeles basin and Orange County areas, to the west and southwest of the San Bernardino Valley, as well as the southern Channel Islands. Gabrielino territory extended from the coast to the San Gabriel and San Bernardino Mountains. The Gabrielino are believed to have been one of the most populous and wealthy Native American tribes in southern California prior to the arrival of the Spanish. They occupied numerous villages with populations ranging from 50 to 200 inhabitants (Bean and Smith 1978a; McCawley 1996). Gabrielino society was organized by kinship groups based on patrilineal affiliations. Each group was composed of several related families who together owned hunting and gathering territories. Settlement patterns were based on the availability of floral and faunal resources which varied by location and season. Vegetal staples consisted of acorns, chia, seeds, pifion nuts, sage, cacti, roots, and bulbs. Animals hunted included deer, antelope, coyote, rabbits, squirrels, rodents, birds, and snakes. Fishing was also done by the Gabrielino (Bean and Smith 1978a; McCawley 1996). Structures were domed, circular, and made from thatched tule or other available wood. Villages typically included at least one sweathouse which was small, semicircular, and earth -covered. Village sweathouses often doubled as meeting houses. Ceremonial structures were also common within villages (Bean and Smith 1978a; McCawley 1996). Upon death, the body of a Gabrielino was wrapped in a blanket and kept until it began to decay, then either cremated or buried. Grave offerings were buried with the body, and the grave might be marked with an etched stone (Bean and Smith 1978a; McCawley 1996). By the late 18th century, the Gabrielino population had dwindled due to introduced diseases and dietary deficiencies. Gabrielino communities near the missions disintegrated as individuals succumbed to Spanish control, fled the region, or died. Later, many Gabrielinos fell into indentured servitude to the Americans. By the early 1900s, few Gabrielinos had survived and most of their culture had been lost (Bean and Smith 1978a; McCawley 1996). Tetra Tech, Inc. 5 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF SLOVER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS IN AND NEAR FONTANA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FINAL 3.1.3 Cahuilla The Cahuilla occupied a territory ranging from the San Bernardino Mountains in the north to the Chocolate Mountains and Borrego Springs in the south, and from the Colorado Desert in the east to Palomar Mountain in the west. The area over which they ranged included high mountains, mountain passes, canyons, and desert. The Cahuilla were involved in trade, marriage, ritual, and war with other groups of Native Americans whose territories they overlapped, primarily the Serrano and Gabrielino (Kroeber 1925; Bean 1972, 1978). The Cahuilla, like the Serrano, divided themselves into two patrilineal moieties, the Wild Cats and the Coyotes. Husbands and wives were chosen for young men and women by their parents, from the opposite moiety. Before Spanish influence, the dead were cremated and their houses were usually burned (Strong 1929; Bean 1978). Cahuilla subsistence consisted of hunting and gathering. Hunting and game butchering was conducted by men, while the cooking of meat was done by women. Game included deer, antelope, rabbits, squirrels, rodents, and birds. Vegetal resources gathered included acorns, piiion nuts, screw beans, seeds, cacti, wild fruits and berries, tubers, roots, and succulent greens. In addition to hunting and gathering, the Cahuilla practiced limited raising of melons, corn, beans, and squash (Bean 1978). Villages were often located near water sources, most commonly in canyons or near drainages on alluvial fans. Cahuilla buildings included dome -shaped or rectangular houses, constructed of poles covered with brush; communal men's sweathouses; and ceremonial dance houses in the form of long, pole -framed structures with ridged roofs covered by arrow weed or palm fronds (Strong 1929; Bean 1978). As many as 10,000 Cahuilla may have existed at the time of European contact in the 18th century. As of 1974, approximately 900 people claiming to be Cahuilla were known to be alive. At that time, only older people spoke the Cahuilla language, but classes to teach it to young people were beginning to be held on the Morongo Reservation (Bean 1978). Tetra Tech, Inc. 6 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF SLOVER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS IN AND NEAR FONTANA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FINAL 3.2 History The first Europeans to visit the region encompassing the project area were a small group of Spanish soldiers led by Captain Pedro Fages. Starting from the San Diego presidio on August 8, 1771, Fages and his men began their trip with the purpose of looking for army deserters, but abandoned the search in the vicinity of present-day Julian in San Diego County and went on an exploratory trip northward. Crossing broad plains and ranges of hills, Fages approached Cajon Pass and camped along the west bank of Lytle Creek on his way to the Mojave Desert. The Serrano Indians he encountered in the area were friendly, offering him food and supplies (Harshman 1992). Among the first Anglo-Americans to cross the area were Jedediah Smith and his party of 18 men, nearing the end of an expedition through the Mojave Desert to San Gabriel Mission. Smith camped for a week on the west side of Lytle Creek near present-day Rialto (Stoebe and Bemis 1976). The Spanish, or "Mission" period in southern California had a minimal effect on the region around the project area. Due to the distance of approximately 40 miles that separated it from the nearest mission, San Gabriel near Los Angeles, Spanish control over the Indian population was less severe, and settlement was less dense than in other areas of southern California (Stoebe and Bemis 1976; Harshman 1992). The Fontana area, including the project location, was encompassed by large rancho grants during the Mexican period of the 1840s. The land on which Fontana was to be built was part of the San Bernardino Rancho, granted to Jose Maria Lugo and his family by Governor Alvarado in 1842 (De Bakcsy 1955; Stoebe and Bemis 1976). The nearest settlement to the project area during this period was Politana, later called Agua Mansa. This Hispanic settlement was located on the banks of the Santa Ana River a short distance downstream from its confluence with Lytle Creek, approximately 4.5 miles southeast of the project area. The riverside location proved to be ill -chosen when the town was wiped out during the disastrous flood of 1862 (Clark 1978/1979; Ahlborn 1982). In 1851 a large group of Mormons arrived to establish a colony in the San Bernardino Valley after a difficult journey from Salt Lake City. One group, under the leadership of Captain Andrew Lytle, camped near the mouth of Canon de los Negros and renamed it Lytle Creek. The Mormons purchased San Bernardino Rancho from the Lugos; however, the United States government did not recognize their claim to the lands west of Lytle Creek, so they settled at what is now San Bernardino (Stoebe and Bemis 1976). Tetra Tech, Inc. 7 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF SLOVER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS IN AND NEAR FONTANA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FINAL Greater than normal precipitation, along with melting of an unusually deep snow pack accumulated during the winter of 1861-1862, resulted in the flood of January 1862, the largest flooding episode recorded in southern California history. In addition to the destruction of Agua Mansa, extensive damage was done to San Bernardino by the Santa Ana River and Lytle Creek (Clark 1978/79; Ahlborn 1982; Hayden et al. 1997). In the long run, however, the disaster did not slow settlement of the area, and throughout the 1860s and 1870s families continued to establish small farms west of Lytle Creek, growing mostly grapes and fruit trees (Stoebe and Bemis 1976). In 1874 the area west of Lytle Creek was the subject of a survey by John Goldsworthy, the U.S. Deputy Surveyor. Goldsworthy left a record of the area that included soil conditions, native vegetation, and land use. The region encompassing the Lytle Creek alluvial plain consisted of north -south trending bands of fertile soil interspersed with bands of rocky, gravelly ground. Natural vegetation consisting of moderately dense coastal sage scrub grew on the soil -covered areas, while vegetation was distinctly less dense in the thin, rocky soil in between. The fanning that existed at the time of the Goldsworthy survey took advantage of the fertile areas. The Goldsworthy survey also indicated that several irrigation ditches or zanjas had been dug to divert water from Lytle Creek to the farms in the area (Hayden et al. 1997). In 1877 Michael White and Henry Hancock, owners of the Muscupiabe land grant to the north of the project area, began litigation against settlers in the Rialto and Fontana areas over water rights to Lytle Creek. The Muscupiabe grant owners claimed riparian rights to the water being diverted by the farmers south of them. In 1879 the Supreme Court decided in favor of White and Hancock, establishing the supremacy of riparian rights over appropriation. This led to the formation of the Lytle Creek Water Company, which included all the water users south of the Muscupiabe grant, for the purpose of legally fighting the Muscupiabe grant owners. While this conflict went on, the farmers in the Rialto and Fontana areas continued to use Lytle Creek water because the law favoring White's and Hancock's riparian rights was not enforced. By 1887, White and Hancock had bought a controlling interest in the Lytle Creek Water Company and sold it to the Semi -Tropic Land and Water Company, along with the riparian rights, ending the conflict (De Bakcsy 1955). The Semi -Tropic Land and Water Company, organized by Los Angeles businessmen George Bonebrake and F.C. Howes, bought 28,500 acres west of Lytle Creek, mostly from the William Pierce family, who had been prominent land owners in the area since 1869, and Muscupiabe grant owners Michael White and Henry Hancock. The townsites of Rialto, Bloomington, and Rosena (later called Fontana) were eventually Tetra Tech, Inc. 8 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF SLOVER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS IN AND NEAR FONTANA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FINAL laid out on Semi -Tropic land. The balance of the land was divided into 20-acre tracts (De Bakcsy 1955; Stoebe and Bemis 1976; Hayden et al. 1997). In 1887 Semi -Tropic constructed the Rialto Canal to connect the agricultural land and settlements in the Rialto and. Fontana areas with the outlet of Lytle Creek Canyon. This channel carried water parallel to the west side of the creek along what is today Riverside Avenue, then turned southward (Stoebe and Bemis 1976). The arrival of the Southern Pacific Railroad in the mid to late 1870s and the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railroad in the mid 1880s opened communications, travel, and shipping between San Bernardino and Los Angeles, as well as other regions of the country. A land boom brought about by cheap rail fares and aggressive real estate promotions was in progress by the late 1880s. Many new families began to arrive and numerous small towns were founded along the route. Those in the vicinity of the project area included Rialto, Colton, Bloomington, and Rosena (later Fontana). In the 1880s, a 2-mile branch line of the Southern Pacific Railroad was built south to the Declezville quarry in the Jurupa mountains. Granite from Declezville was used extensively in construction in the Los Angeles area and as far away as San Francisco. Just south of the Southern Pacific main line tracks, where the Declezville tracks and Live Oak Avenue intersect Slover Avenue near the west end of the project area, the tiny settlement of Declez developed. The names Declezville and Declez were given to both locations by the Southern Pacific in honor of William Declez, who owned the quarry. After about 1910, concrete became the preferred building material for office buildings, replacing granite, and the Declezville quarry declined. Activity there was revived, however, for supplying granite for the Los Angeles Harbor breakwater at San Pedro between 1912 and 1915, and for repairs to the Colton railroad yards and San Timoteo Canyon railroad tracks after the 1938 flood. The settlement of Declez, north of the quarry along Slover Avenue, became part of south Fontana (Belden 1961). In 1897, due to financial problems, the Semi -Tropic Land and Water Company sold its holdings to the Chacala Water Company and the Anglo-American Canaigre Company. Anglo-American began raising canaigre, a type of rhubarb used as a source of tannic acid for curing hides, on an 8,000-acre plantation. This "Canaigre Colony" became the Santa Fe Railroad stop Rosena. The market for canaigre was not as strong as anticipated, and the plantation was failing by the early 1900s (De Bakcsy 1955; Cox 1999). Tetra Tech, Inc. 9 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF SLOVER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS IN AND NEAR FONTANA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FINAL In March, 1905, A. Blanchard Miller, engineer and foreman of a grading crew that had been clearing land and building canals in Imperial Valley, arrived with his men in Rosena to begin farming. That year, Miller and his crew planted 100 acres of feed grain and worked on clearing more land. Brush was cleared with lengths of railroad track bolted to timbers and dragged by 10-horse teams. Trees were dug out by hand, largely by hired Mexican and Japanese laborers (De Bakcsy 1955; Frantz 1971). By 1906, Miller, along with business partners he had taken on to provide financing, had established the Fontana Development Company and had 3,000 acres of barley growing. The same year, they purchased 20,000 additional acres and 75 percent of Lytle Creek's flow (De Bakcsy 1955; Frantz 1971). Intensive agricultural development of the Fontana area began around 1909. Through 1913, over 500 miles of concrete irrigation pipeline were constructed and as many miles of eucalyptus -tree windbreaks were planted. By the spring of 1910 about 89,000 citrus trees, including Washington navel oranges, Thompson Imperial navels, Valencia oranges, Navelencia oranges, lemons, and grapefruit had been selected from established southern California groves. Miller hired Professor John Norton of the Citrus Experiment Station at Riverside as chief horticulturist and superintendent of the Fontana groves. Norton immediately established the Fontana Nursery and the Fontana Experiment Station. In 1911, 200,000 citrus trees were raised in the Fontana Nursery and planted in groves. The same year, acacias, Monterey pines, magnolias, silver pines, pepper trees, black locusts, and palms were planted as ornamental street trees (De Bakcsy 1955; Frantz 1971). By 1912 the Fontana Development Company had reorganized into the Fontana Company and the Fontana Union Water Company for the purpose of developing the large Fontana property. On June 7, 1913, the townsite of Fontana was dedicated on the former site of Rosena, between Foothill Boulevard and the Santa Fe Railroad tracks. Several thousand people attended, and $59,125.00 worth of land was sold that day. For months afterward, large crews were employed laying out and paving streets, sidewalks, and curbs. By 1914 a grammar school, packing house, and Pacific Electric Railroad station had been built, all in the popular Mission Revival style (De Bakcsy 1955; Frantz 1971). Throughout the late 1910s and 1920s Fontana prospered. By the end of 1920 5,000 acres were planted in citrus, forming the largest single citrus grove in the world. Approximately 12,000 acres were occupied by deciduous fruit trees. Other crops included peanuts, barley, sweet potatoes, potatoes, hay, melons, and beans. Livestock, including horses, mules, cows, goats, and hogs, were also being raised. In 1921, Miller established the Declez Hog Plant in south Fontana, which became the largest hog ranch in the world. By Tetra Tech, Inc. 10 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF SLOVER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS IN AND NEAR FONTANA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FINAL 1922 tons of garbage from Los Angeles were being hauled to south Fontana on railroad flat cars to feed more than 40,000 hogs. In addition to the huge hog plant, a large poultry farm was established that had 300,000 hens by 1926. Many local residents supplemented their incomes by supplying hens and eggs to the poultry farm from their own coops (De Bakcsy 1955; Lyon 1955; Cox 1999). Besides citrus, deciduous fruits, and other crops, Miller authorized the planting of extensive grape vineyards in Fontana. By 1923 more than 5,000 acres of grapes, the largest irrigated vineyard in the world, were growing between the Santa Fe and Southern Pacific railroad tracks. Most of the grapes grown were used to make the sweet wines popular at that time (De Bakcsy 1955). By the mid-1920s people from all parts of the country were moving to Fontana and buying up acreage from the Fontana Company in 2.5-, 5-, 10-, and 20-acre units. These new residents built houses along the roads that passed among the orchards and vineyards. In 1925 a school for Hispanic residents was built in south Fontana. In 1926 the population was 4,200 and a new junior high school and grade school addition had been built. The years of the Great Depression were hard on the economy of the region, yet Fontana continued to build and develop throughout the 1930s (Cadwell 1955a; De Bakcsy 1955). During the early period of the Unites States' involvement in World War II the San Bernardino area was made headquarters of the Western Defense Command. Its distance from the threat of an aircraft -carrier - based Japanese attack, as well as its status as a hub of the regional highway, railroad, and telephone network, made it an ideal location. The U.S. Army Base General Depot, unofficially called Camp Ono, was built as a supply base by the Quartermaster Corps near Shandin Hills northwest of San Bernardino; the U.S. Army Air Depot, which later became Norton Air Force Base, was laid out along the north side of the Santa Ana River between San Bernardino and Redlands; and the Fontana U.S. Army Ordnance Department Depot was built northeast of the intersection of Sierra Avenue and Highland Avenue (Belden 1963; Hayden et al. 1997). Construction of the Kaiser Steel plant was begun in Fontana in 1942 to provide steel for the construction of military ships at California shipyards (Cadwell 1955b). Following World War II, the population of Fontana grew as industrial development gradually increased and agriculture declined as the predominant economy. Fontana was incorporated as a city in 1952, and new housing was constructed throughout the post-war years (Cadwell 1955a,b; De Bakcsy 1955). By the 1980s, agriculture had nearly disappeared from the area. The large open fields, remains of eucalyptus windbreaks Tetra Tech, Inc. 11 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF SLOVER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS IN AND NEAR FONTANA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FINAL and irrigation features, and scattered early 20th century houses and outbuildings in the project area are among the few reminders left of Fontana's prosperous agricultural past. 4.0 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS Three cultural resources surveys have taken place in the project area. The first was conducted in 1984 by Kathleen C. Del Chario and Marie G. Cottrell of Archaeological Resource Management Corporation for the Southern Pacific Business Park southeast of the east end of the project area. Two small prehistoric campsites were discovered. Site CA-SBR-5443, located approximately 1.2 miles southeast of the project area, contained lithic flakes, flaked stone scrapers, and schist manos. Site CA-SBR-5444, located approximately .7 mile east-southeast of the project area, contained lithic flakes and cores, schist manos, and hammerstones (Del Chario and Cottrell 1984). Both sites, which have since been destroyed by development, were probably loci of site CA-SBR-1574, identified in 1942 (Smith 1942). The second survey was of the Southern Pacific Railroad Declezville branch line just east of the intersection of Slover and Live Oak Avenues near the western end of the project area. This survey was conducted by James Brock of Archaeological Advisory Group in 1993 as part of the Santa Ana and Live Oak railroad crossing project. An area extending 5 meters to either side of the Declezville tracks from the Southern Pacific main line to just south of Jurupa Avenue was recorded as site CA-SBR-7426H (Brock 1993). The third survey was conducted by J. Stephen Alexandrowicz of Archaeological Consulting Services in 1994 in support of a San Bernardino County Planning Department project at the intersection of Slover and Cherry Avenues. Site CA-SBR-7495H, a mid-20th century house and outbuildings, was recorded during this survey (Alexandrowicz 1994). This site has since been destroyed, and the property where it was located is occupied by new commercial development. Prehistoric Serrano and Gabrielino sites have been said to exist near the present locations of Colton and Rialto, and along the banks of Lytle Creek (Hayden et al. 1997). Although no prehistoric sites have been identified within the project area, three prehistoric camp sites (CA-SBR-1574, CA-SBR-5443 and CA-SBR- 5444) have been recorded to the southeast and east-southeast (Smith 1942; Del Chario and Cottrell 1984). Prehistoric camps and village sites were usually located near water sources, and none exist in the project area. Groups traveling through the project area may have engaged in food and materials procurement or tool making activities; however, the sites created by these types of activities are usually small and Tetra Tech, Inc. 12 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF SLOVER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS IN AND NEAR FONTANA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FINAL sometimes difficult to detect. In addition, intensive agriculture and post -World War II urbanization and industrialization of the area have probably destroyed any prehistoric sites that may have been present. 5.0 METHODS A review of materials obtained through a record search at the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center, located at the San Bernardino County Museum in Redlands, California, was conducted to determine whether previously documented prehistoric or historic archaeological sites, architectural resources, cultural landscapes, or ethnic resources exist within the area of potential effect (APE). Materials reviewed included archaeological site records and historic maps. Further archival research was conducted at the San Bernardino County Archives in San Bernardino, California, the California Room of the Feldheym Central Library in San Bernardino, and the History Room of the A.K. Smiley Public Library in Redlands, California. Assessor's map and parcel books at the County Archives were consulted for information on the commercial building located at 14882 Slover Avenue, and the houses located at 15803, 15922, and 16696 Slover Avenue. The two public library collections were searched for information on the historic background of the San Bernardino region and the Fontana area. Materials reviewed included local history books and journals, oral history interviews, and newspaper articles. Fieldwork consisted of a pedestrian survey beginning at Sierra Avenue and traveling west to Cherry Avenue along the north side of Slover Avenue, then returning eastward to Sierra Avenue along the south side of Slover Avenue. Examination of the ground surface between the pavement and the boundary of the Slover Avenue right-of-way, 52 feet from the center line of the road, was conducted for archaeological materials to the extent allowed by private property fencing. Notes on every building along Slover Avenue between Sierra and Cherry Avenues were taken including type of building, estimated age of construction, and condition. In addition, notes on the architectural styles, building materials, configurations, and locations in relation to the APE were recorded for buildings estimated to be more than 50 years old. Some historic -age buildings and structures are located close to or within the boundary of the APE, and the distances from these to the center line of Slover Avenue were measured with a tape in feet and inches. Black and white photographs of some historic -age buildings and structures were taken, depending upon their condition and location in relation to the APE. State of California Department of Parks and Recreation Primary Record forms and Building, Structure, and Object Record forms were only completed for one Tetra Tech, Inc. 13 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF SLOVER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS IN AND NEAR FONTANA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FINAL feature that is likely to be destroyed by road widening (Appendix A). No forms were completed for the other buildings and structures along Slover Avenue because none are located within the boundaries of the APE and, based on the current project description, none of them will be damaged or destroyed as a result of road -widening activities. 6.0 RESULTS 6.1 Archaeological Resources No prehistoric archaeological sites were identified during the field survey. Intensive agricultural development, residential construction, industrial development since World War II, and heavy road use have erased any surface evidence of prehistoric human activity within the project area. Sites CA-SBR-7426H, the Declezville branch of the Southern Pacific Railroad, and CA-SBR-7495H, a mid-20th century house with associated outbuildings, were both field checked with reference to their Archaeological Site Records. Site CA-SBR-7426H remains as it was when it was recorded in 1993. Site CA-SBR-7495H, recorded in 1994, has been destroyed, and late-1990s commercial development stands in its location. 6.2 Architectural Resources Twenty-six buildings of definite or probable historic age were identified. Information on these buildings including type, known or estimated date or period of construction, address, approximate distance from the center line of Slover Avenue, and condition is presented in Table 1. Twenty-five of these buildings, as well as several houses of probable 1950s construction, were determined to fall outside the APE of 40 feet from the center line and the 52-foot distance comprising the County's right-of-way. These buildings will not be permanently affected by road widening activities, which will probably not surpass the levels of noise and dust generated by heavy traffic and industry already occurring along Slover Avenue. Many of the buildings will, however, lose portions of their front yards and landscaping plantings. One historic -age commercial building, a detached shrine on the grounds of a 1930s church, and a stone wall associated with an historic -age house are within the 52-foot right-of-way. Although road widening will not extend more than 40 feet beyond the center line of Slover Avenue, construction activity may come Tetra Tech, Inc. 14 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF SLOVER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS IN AND NEAR FONTANA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FINAL Condition Below Average Average Average Below Average Below Average Below Average Below Average Above Average Above Average Average Below Average Below Average N b dld `" Below Average I Q a) a W Above Average I Below Average Below Average Q to — W Above Average I Average Average Above Average Below Average Below Average Above Average Distance from Center Line in Feet + to 10 + to vO + to 1D + to vO + to VD + to VD + to 1D + to 10 + to 10 + to 10 + to 1O + to 10 °o M .d. + to 1D 65+ to main building; 50 to curbside shrine + to kD + to to + to vD + to vD + try 1D + N 10 + to t� 65 + to house 37.25 to stone wall + to \D + 0 00 + 0 1O Approximate Age h O N C1 .--( C, O N 01 1--1 CA O N ON .-r 1920s-1940s CAC O N O1 _4 O N 01 .--t 1920s-1940s ca. 1927 1920s-1940s 1930s-1940s CA 0 N ON .--i to O N 01 .--+ ca. 1928 to O NM C1 .--I CZ 01 `—' 1920s-1940s y O N 01 .--1 to O N 01 1,-1 1920s-1930s Cl) O N O1 .--i to 0 N 01 ,--i 0 ON .--4 s rn O M Ch ca. 1927 to O N 01 .--- CA O, N 01 .--t ca. 1929 Type of Building House House House 4) C) 0 x House House _ House House, Chicken Coop House House 4) ,n O 0 x House Commercial House Church House House House House House House House House with Stone Wall House House House, Span. Col. Rev. Slover Ave. Address 16654 "Cr — .-� in 1/40 16256 16228 16204 b _ VD 16150 15922 O— toto 15594 N_tn 14928 I 14882 14826 14798 14750 14726 14698 oo 1/40 14833 14841 'mod' 15803 15817 16381 001 VD Historic -Age Buildings Recorded on Slover Avenue between Sierra and Cherry Avenues. G) 7.0 Tetra Tech, Inc. 15 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF SLOVER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS IN AND NEAR FONTANA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FINAL within a few feet of the building and the two features. The remains of a possible lamp post feature associated with an historic -age gasoline filling station, located on the edge of Slover Avenue, will either be destroyed or moved to a new location as a result of road widening. Many. of the houses along Slover Avenue will lose portions of their front yards as a result of road widening. Two of these houses are of particular interest, due to a remaining agricultural outstructure (chicken coop) associated with one and the Spanish Colonial Revival architectural style of the other. 14882 Slover Avenue (commercial building). The commercial building is located on the northwest corner of Slover and Live Oak Avenues (Figures 2, 3). It is occupied by a market and delicatessen, and appears to have always functioned as the site of a retail business. The building has a concrete foundation and floors, concrete or block walls covered with stucco, a sloping parapet covered with curved terra cotta roof tiles, and seven columns that are flush with the walls and extend above the parapet. Some of the columns project from the walls as pilasters. The entry is diagonal, facing the corner, and consists of a double door, which does not appear to be original. Large windows or doors on the south elevation, facing Slover Avenue, are now covered with plywood. The building, which was constructed about 1928 (San Bernardino County Archives n.d.a,b), is in fair condition. Its south wall is 43 feet 10 inches from the center line of Slover Avenue, therefore it is outside the APE. 14798 Slover Avenue (Saint Mary's Church). Saint Mary's Catholic Church, built in 1939, is located on the north side of Slover Avenue, .1 mile west of the historic commercial building described above (Figures 2, 4). The Mission -style building is in good condition and appears to have undergone minimal modification. It is L-shaped, with the entry on the end of the front wing, facing Slover Avenue. The rear wing is parallel to Slover Avenue, and features a bell tower. The roof is gabled, and covered with curved terra cotta tiles on the front wing and composition shingles on the rear wing. The stucco -covered walls are decorated with pilasters and supported by buttresses. The wood double entry doors have square windows bearing the name of the church in leaded stained glass, which appears to be original. The church building stands outside the APE; however, a curbside shrine is located only 50 feet from the center line of Slover Avenue, within the 52-foot County right-of-way. The style and construction materials of the shrine appear to be more recent than the main church building. 15803 Slover Avenue (house with stone wall). The stone wall near the APE delineates the front yard of a small, circa-1927 house located approximately half -way between Poplar and Catawba Avenues on the south side of Slover Avenue (San Bernardino County Archives n.d.c,d) (Figures 2, 5). The single -story, Tetra Tech, Inc. 16 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF SLOVER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS IN AND NEAR FONTANA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FINAL Figure 3 Commercial Building (ca. 1928), 14882 Slover Avenue. View to West. Tetra Tech, Inc. 17 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF SLOVER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS IN AND NEAR FONTANA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FINAL Figure 4 Saint Mary's Church (1939) and Shrine, 14798 Slover Avenue. View to Northwest. Tetra Tech, Inc. 18 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF SLOVER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS IN AND NEAR FONTANA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FINAL Figure 5 House and Stone Wall (ca. 1927), 15803 Stover Avenue. View to South. Tetra Tech, Inc. 19 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF SLOVER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS IN AND NEAR FONTANA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FINAL vernacular -style house has a medium -pitched, gabled roof and lapped -wood siding, and is in good condition. It has a recent, wood -framed addition in back and an older, brick addition on its west side. The sides of the concrete front porch are made of field stones. Field stone column pedestals capped with concrete squares hold wood four-by-fours that support the porch roof. The design of the wall separating the front yard from the street reflects the design of the porch sides and columns. The wall is located 37 feet 3 inches from the center line of Slover Avenue. Current plans for widening of Slover Avenue do not include this wall within the APE (Gilbert, personal communication, 1999). Gasoline station feature. The remains of a possible lamp post, associated with a gasoline filling station shown on a circa-1940s San Bernardino County Land and Water map (San Bernardino County n.d.), are - located near the north edge of Slover Avenue, approximately 20 feet from the road's center line (Figure 2). The filling station no longer exists. The unpaved area where it once stood is immediately west of, and currently used as a parking lot for the commercial building at 14882 Slover Avenue, discussed above. The feature remains consist of an iron pole approximately 8 feet high, mounted on a cylindrical concrete footing 3 feet in diameter and 1 foot 6 inches high. The pole contains a small -gauge pipe that projects from the top in a hooked shape, and electrical wire. State of California Primary Record and Building, Structure, and Object Record forms were completed for this feature because it is within the APE. These forms are provided, along with a photograph, in Appendix A. A state primary number is pending. 15922 Slover Avenue (house with chicken coop). This house is a circa-1927 vernacular -style dwelling near the northeast corner of the intersection of Slover and Catawba Avenues (San Bernardino County Archives n.d.e,f) (Figures 2, 6). The house, which is in good condition, has a medium -pitched gabled roof and lapped wood siding. Situated approximately 75 feet east of the house is .a long, low, rectangular wooden structure with a concrete foundation, lapped wood and clapboard siding, and a corrugated iron, gabled roof (Figure 6). The concrete foundation extends beyond the structure toward the east. According to the owner and occupant of the property, who has lived there for more than 40 years, the structure was originally a chicken coop. The portion of the concrete foundation extending to the east once supported an additional coop, which he demolished many years ago (Israel, personal communication, 1999). The remaining coop, which is in fair condition, is currently used for storage. The area between the coop and Slover Avenue to the south is fenced with reused railroad ties and wire mesh. Neither the house nor the chicken coop, which is several feet farther from Slover Avenue than the house, will be reached by road - widening activities; however, a portion of the front yard of the house and the fenced area south of the coop will be lost. Tetra Tech, Inc. 20 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF SLOVER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS IN AND NEAR FONTANA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FINAL Figure 6 House and Chicken Coop (ca. 1927), 15922 Slover Avenue. Views to Northwest. Tetra Tech, Inc. 21 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF SLOVER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS IN AND NEAR FONTANA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FINAL 16696 Slover Avenue (Spanish Colonial Revival house). This house is a circa-1929 Spanish Colonial Revival residence located at 16696 Slover Avenue, on the southwest corner of the intersection of Slover and Juniper Avenues (San Bernardino County Archives n.d.g,h) (Figures 2, 7). The house, which is in good condition, has stucco -covered wood -framed walls and a flat roof with a parapet. A stuccoed archway leads to the front entry and a small, walled patio. A terra-cotta-tiled awning shelters a large, arched window on the front elevation. The house is partially obscured from view by dense landscape plantings. Some of these, as well as a row of mature eucalyptus windbreak trees planted before subdivision of the lot into residential tracts, will be destroyed by road -widening activities. The house, however, is beyond the 52-foot right of way and will not be affected by road construction work. 6.3 Eucalyptus Tree Windbreak In addition to the buildings and structures that lie near or within the Slover Avenue right-of-way, numerous mature eucalyptus trees still stand along the south side of the street. Most of these trees are within the 52- foot right-of-way, and many are within the proposed APE of 40 feet from the center line. The trees were planted between about 1909 and 1913 to shelter crops and groves from the high winds that are common south of Cajon Pass, and therefore predate the residential development of Slover Avenue (De Bakcsy 1955; Frantz 1971). Only intermittent segments remain of what was once a continuous double row of eucalyptus trees along the roadside. In some blocks there are no trees left, while in others only a few are standing. Where the trees still exist, most of them have been reduced to a single row or isolated, single trees. The majority of eucalyptus windbreak trees still growing are located between Redwood and Live Oak Avenues, Beech and Elm Avenues, and Poplar and Sierra Avenues. 7.0 CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS 7.1 Archaeological Resources No archaeological sites were identified during the Slover Avenue survey; therefore, no further archaeological work is recommended. However, if archaeological materials are encountered during ground - disturbing activities related to road widening, work should be suspended in the vicinity until the deposits are recorded and evaluated by a qualified archaeologist. Tetra Tech, Inc. 22 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF SLOVER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS IN AND NEAR FONTANA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FINAL Figure 7 House (ca. 1929), 16696 Slover Avenue. View to Southwest. Tetra Tech, Inc. 23 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF SLOVER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS IN AND NEAR FONTANA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FINAL The Declezville branch of the Southern Pacific Railroad (site CA-SBR-7426H) is still in use. During the survey, locomotives pulling freight cars were seen on the branch line crossing Slover Avenue. Construction in this area is not scheduled to begin until spring, 2000. At that time, the project plans should be examined to determine whether the railroad crossing will be affected. If so, the site should be evaluated for eligibility to the California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR) by a qualified archaeologist, and impacts should be assessed. Alternatives to paving over or removing the railroad ties, such as the use of crossing materials that do not damage or destroy them, should be considered first to avoid impacts to the site. Since site CA-SBR-7495H, a mid-20' century house and outbuildings, has been destroyed and a new commercial building and parking lot have taken its place, there will be no impacts as a result of road - widening activities. No further work, therefore, is needed. 7.2 Architectural Resources Twenty-five of the 26 historic -age buildings in the project area are located beyond the County's right-of- way of 52 feet from the center line of Slover Avenue. These buildings will not be affected by road - widening activities. Road -widening may come close to the commercial building at 14882 Slover Avenue, the curbside shrine at Saint Mary's Church, and the front landscaping wall of the house at 15803 Slover Avenue, and will result in the moving or destruction of an historic -age filling station feature near the northwest corner of the intersection of Slover and Live Oak Avenues. 14882 Slover Avenue (commercial building). The south elevation of this circa-1928 commercial building (Figures 2, 3) is 43 feet 10 inches from the road's center line. This is within the County right-of-way of 52 feet from the center line, but is 3 feet 10 inches outside the APE of 40 feet from the center line. Construction activities are not expected to affect the building, therefore no further action is recommended. However, if construction plans are revised or modified and damage to the building may occur as a result, the building and its surroundings should be recorded and evaluated for eligibility to the CRHR by a qualified archaeologist or architectural historian. Recordation should be completed on State of California Primary Record and Building, Structure, and Object Record forms. If the structure is determined to be eligible to the CRHR, adverse impacts from road -widening activities would be considered significant. Possible mitigation measures include widening of the road to less than 40 feet from the center line in this area, avoidance of the building during road widening activities, or data recovery in the form of Historic Tetra Tech, Inc. 24 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF SLOVER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS IN AND NEAR FONTANA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FINAL American Building Survey recordation. The appropriate mitigation measure should be determined in consultation with the California Office of Historic Preservation. 14798 Slover Avenue (Saint Mary's Church). The curbside shrine at Saint Mary's. Church (Figures 2, 4), is located 50 feet from the road's center line, within the County's 52-foot right-of-way but outside the APE. The shrine appears to be of more recent construction than the associated 1939 main church building, and may not be of historic age. It is, however, a religious resource that is in daily use by members of the church. Slover Avenue in the vicinity of Saint Mary's Catholic Church is already a total of four lanes wide, and gutters, curbs, and sidewalks already exist. The curb next to the shrine is approximately 37 feet from the road's center line. Construction is not scheduled to begin in this area until spring, 2000. The road width and improvements may already be adequate in the vicinity of the church and new construction may not be necessary. However, if any ground disturbance or construction takes place at this location, special care should be taken to consult with church management, protect the shrine from dust and debris, and maintain pedestrian access to the shrine and the church. 15803 Slover Avenue (house with stone wall). Although the circa-1927 house (Figures 2, 5) is outside the APE, the field stone wall in its front yard stands only 37 feet 3 inches from the center line of the road. Road widening, which is not scheduled to begin in this block until spring, 2000, will not extend to the wall in this area (Gilbert, personal communication, 1999), therefore no further action is recommended. However, if construction plans are revised or modified and damage to the wall as a result of nearby road work may occur, the wall and its setting, which includes the house, should be recorded and evaluated for eligibility to the CRHR by a qualified archaeologist or architectural historian. Recordation should be completed on State of California Primary Record and Building, Structure, and Object Record forms. If the house and wall are determined to be eligible to the CRHR, adverse impacts from road -widening activities would be considered significant. Possible mitigation measures include widening the road to less than 40 feet from the center line in this area, carefully moving the wall to a position several feet south of its present location, or data recovery in the form of Historic American Building Survey recordation for the house and associated wall. The appropriate mitigation measure should be determined in consultation with the California Office of Historic Preservation. Gasoline station feature. The filling station lamp post remains that are located just west of the commercial building at 14882 Slover Avenue will be within the APE of scheduled road widening, and will either be destroyed or moved. Because of this, the feature has been documented on State of California Primary Tetra Tech, Inc. 25 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF SLOVER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS IN AND NEAR FONTANA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FINAL Record and Building, Structure, and Object Record forms (Appendix A), and a state primary number is pending. Parts of the lamp post are missing, and the remaining portion is in poor condition. No trace exists of the filling station with which it was associated, and the feature, which sits on the ground surface and is therefore moveable, may not be in its original location. Although the gasoline station may have been of local historical significance as part of the early commercial development of Slover Avenue, the station no longer exists and this object has no historical significance of its own due to its ancillary function and lack of integrity. It is therefore not considered eligible to the CRHR, and no further action is recommended. House with chicken coop and Spanish Colonial Revival house. Of the two notable houses that will lose portions of their front yards as a result of road widening, the circa-1927 house at 15922 Slover Avenue (Figures 2, 6) is of interest because of its associated chicken coop. The circa-1929 residence at 16696 Slover Avenue (Figures 2, 7) is noted for its Spanish Colonial Revival architecture. Poultry was an important industry in Fontana during the 1920s, as indicated by the establishment of a commercial poultry farm that had grown to include 300,000 hens in 1926. Many hens were supplied to the large farm by local residents, who supplemented their incomes with coops built on their own property (De Bakcsy 1955). The chicken coop at 15922 Slover Avenue may. be one of the few remaining examples in the region representing this activity. The Spanish Colonial Revival in residential architecture became popular after the extensive publicity given architect Bertram Goodhue's buildings for the 1915 Panama -California Exposition in San Diego. Common in southern California, the Southwest, and Florida, the style was a response to the Hispanic past of those regions much as the contemporaneous Colonial Revival style of the northeastern states reflected their pre- Revolutionary War heritage. By the late 1930s, interest in Spanish Colonial Revival architecture had declined, and few houses were built in that style thereafter (McAlester and McAlester 1990). The house at 16696 Slover Avenue is the only example of its type in the study area. Although these two houses and the chicken coop will lose part of their adjacent yards, neither the buildings nor the coop structure, which is farther from the road than its associated house, will be reached by road - widening activities. No further action, therefore, is recommended. Construction will, however, come within 20 feet of one of the houses, the Spanish Colonial Revival residence at 16696 Slover Avenue, and several large eucalyptus trees along the roadside to the north of the house will be cut down. Care should be exercised during this activity to ensure that the house is protected from falling limbs. Tetra Tech, Inc. 26 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF SLOVER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS IN AND NEAR FONTANA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FINAL 7.3 Eucalyptus Tree Windbreak Road widening will result in the removal of numerous eucalyptus trees planted as crop and orchard windbreaks between approximately 1909 and 1913. Remains of what was originally a double tree row can still be found between Redwood and Live Oak Avenues, Beech and Elm Avenues, and Poplar and Sierra Avenues. Where the trees still exist, they have been reduced mostly to intermittent single row segments. The trees were planted as part of the early rural agricultural landscape of the area, several years before the beginning of the residential development of the 1920s. Subdivision of agricultural fields and house construction has continued to the present time, with the result that most of Slover Avenue within the study area is lined with houses. Since World War II, industrial use of the area has also grown steadily. Numerous trucking yards and manufacturing plants are interspersed with housing along Slover Avenue, covering acreage once occupied by agriculture. The few empty fields that remain are filled with weeds; no crops, orchards, or intact irrigation systems are left in the area. Because of both residential and industrial development, automobile and commercial truck traffic on Slover Avenue has reached a high level, and portions of the road have already been widened, with the result that hundreds of eucalyptus trees, including all the trees along some blocks, have already been destroyed. No further action is recommended, since residential and industrial development have steadily changed the character of the area to the point that the integrity of the tree row and its association with its historical rural agricultural setting are gone. Tetra Tech, Inc.. 27 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF SLOVER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS IN AND NEAR FONTANA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FINAL 8.0 REFERENCES Ahlborn, William O. 1982 Santa Ana River Basin Flood Hazard. Quarterly of the San Bernardino County Museum Association 29(2). Alexandrowicz, J. Stephen 1994 Archaeological Site Record for site CA-SBR-7495H. Prepared by Archaeological Consulting Services, Lytle Creek, California. On file at the San Bernardino Archaeological Information Center, San Bernardino County Museum, Redlands, California. Bean, Lowell J. 1972 Mukat's People: The Cahuilla Indians of Southern California. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles. 1978 Cahuilla. In Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8, California, edited by Robert F. Heizer. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Bean, Lowell J., and Charles R. Smith 1978a Gabrielino. In Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8, California, edited by Robert F. Heizer. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 1978b Serrano. In Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8, California, edited by Robert F. Heizer. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Belden, L. Burr 1961 "Declez Granite Hauled to Make Harbor for L.A." San Bernardino Sun -Telegram, California, April 23, D-6. 1963 "Wars I and II Brought Major Gains to Rialto." San Bernardino Sun -Telegram, California, February 3, B-10. Brock, James 1993 Archaeological Site Record for site CA-SBR-7426H. Prepared by Archaeological Advisory Group, Pioneertown, California. On file at the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center, San Bernardino County Museum, Redlands, California. Cadwell, Ernest 1955a Historical Dates. In History of Fontana. Edited by Ernest Cadwell. San Bernardino County Historical Society and the Fontana Chamber of Commerce, Fontana, California. Pp. 37-38. 1955b Prosperity Knocks at the Door. In History of Fontana. Edited by Ernest Cadwell. San Bernardino County Historical Society and the Fontana Chamber of Commerce, Fontana, California. Pp. 46-47. Clark, Anthony O. 1978/79 Quaternary Evolution of the San Bernardino Valley. Quarterly of the San Bernardino County Museum Association 26(2 & 3), Winter/Spring. Tetra Tech, Inc. 28 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF SLOVER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS IN AND NEAR FONTANA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FINAL Cox, Elizabeth 1999 Rosena's Canaigre Colony. Rialto Historical Society article on file at the California Room, Feldheym Central Library, San Bernardino, California. De Bakcsy, Cornelius 1955 The History of Fontana. In History of Fontana. Edited by Ernest Cadwell. San Bernardino County Historical Society and the Fontana Chamber of Commerce, Fontana, California. Pp. 3-14. Del Chario, Kathleen C., and Marie G. Cottrell 1984 Archaeological Resources Assessment Conducted for the Southern Pacific Business Park, City of Fontana, San Bernardino County, California. Prepared by Archaeological Resource Management Corporation, Garden Grove, California. On file at the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center, San Bernardino County Museum, Redlands, California. Earle, David D. 1997 Ethnohistoric Overview of the Edwards Air Force Base Region and the Western Mojave Desert. Computer Sciences Corporation, El Segundo, California. Earle, David D., B. Boyer, R.A. Bryson, R.U. Bryson, M.M. Campbell, J.D. Johannesmeyer, K.A. Lark, C.J. Parker, M.D. Pittman, L.M. Ramirez, M.R. Ronning, and J. Underwood 1997 Cultural Resources Overview and Management Plan for Edwards AFB, California. Volume I: Overview of Prehistoric Cultural Resources. Computer Sciences Corporation, El Segundo, California. Frantz, Karen 1971 History of Rural Fontana and the Decline of Agriculture. Unpublished thesis on file at the California Room, Feldheym Central Library, San Bernardino, California. Gilbert, Julie 1999 Senior Associate Planner, San Bernardino County Transportation/Flood Control Department -Environmental Management Division. Personal communication with Evelyn N. Chandler, May 21. Harshman, Virginia R. 1992 The Story of Lytle Creek Canyon. Guthrie Publications, Lytle Creek, California. Hayden, William, Benjamin Vargas, David D. Earle, Paul E. Langenwalter III, and Michael E. Macko 1997 Historical, Archaeological, and Paleontological Assessment of the Mid -Valley Sanitary Landfill Expansion, San Bernardino County, California. Macko, Inc., Santa Ana Heights, California. Hinton, L., and Y. Montijo 1993/94 In Our Own Words. News from Native California 7(4), Fall/Winter. Israel, Elijah 1999 Owner/occupant of house at 15922 Slover Avenue, Fontana, CA, 92335. Personal communication with Cary D. Cotterman, April 20. Tetra Tech, Inc. 29 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF SLOVER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS IN AND NEAR FONTANA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FINAL Johnston, Francis J. 1965 The Serrano Indians of Southern California. Malki Museum Brochure No. 2. Malki Museum Press, Banning, California. Kroeber, A.L. 1925 Handbook of the Indians of California. Dover Publications, Inc., New York. Lyon, Clyde A. 1955 Oral history interview with early. Fontana resident. In History of Fontana, Edited by Ernest Cadwell. San Bernardino County Historical Society and the Fontana Chamber of Commerce, Fontana, California. Pp. 16. McAlester, Virginia S.T., and A. Lee McAlester 1990 A Field Guide to American Houses. Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., New York. McCawley, William 1996 The First Angelenos: The Gabrielino Indians of Los Angeles. Malki Museum Press, Banning, California and Ballena Press, Novato, California. San Bernardino County n.d. Land and Water Map, Stover Avenue from Etiwanda Avenue to Sierra Avenue. San Bernardino County Archives n.d.a San Bernardino County Assessor's Map Book Number 52, p. 10, Lot 10, Tract 2092. n.d.b San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel Book Number 38-A, p.5, Lines 837-839. n.d.c San Bernardino County Assessor's Map Book Number 52, p. 13, Lot 842, Tract 1845. n.d.d San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel Book Number 22B, p. 26, Lines 273-275. n.d.e San Bernardino County Assessor's Map Book Number 52, p. 9, Lot 840, Tract 3485. n.d.f San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel Book Number 22B, p. 26, Line 267. n.d.g San Bernardino County Assessor's Map Book Number 52, p. 13, Lot 746, Tract 63. n.d.h San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel Book Number 38A, p. 4, Lines 685-689. Smith, Gerald A. 1942 Traces of Ancient Man in Bloomington, California. The Masterkey 16(4): 124-127. Stoebe, Martha G., and L. Roy Bemis 1976 A History of Rialto. Rialto Bicentennial Committee, Rialto, California. Strong, William D. 1929 Aboriginal Society in Southern California. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology. University of California Press, Berkeley. Tetra Tech, Inc. 30 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF SLOVER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS IN AND NEAR FONTANA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FINAL U.S. Geological Survey 1980 Fontana, California. 7.5-Minute Series Topographic Quadrangle Map. Wildflower Productions 1996 TOPO! Map of Los Angeles and Surrounding Areas. Tetra Tech, Inc. 31 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF SLOVER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS IN AND NEAR FONTANA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FINAL 9.0 LIST OF PREPARERS Cary D. Cotterman, Archaeologist/Principal Author, Tetra Tech, Inc. B.A., 1994, Anthropology, California State University, San Bernardino Evelyn N. Chandler, Archaeologist/Contributing Author, Tetra Tech, Inc. B.A., 1989, Anthropology/Sociology, University of Redlands, Redlands, California B.A., 1989, Political Science, University of Redlands, Redlands, California Tetra Tech, Inc. 32 APPENDIX A State of California - The Resources Agency Primary No: DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION .HRI No: PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial: NRHP:Status Code: 6Z Other: Listings: 'Review Code: `' Reviewer: Date: Page 1 of 4 P1. Other Identifier: Possible Gas Station Lamp Post *Resource Name or No: Gasoline Filling Station Feature *P2. Location: X Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County: San Bernardino *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Fontana, Calif. Date: 1980 T 1S , R 6W , SE 1/4 of SE 1/4 of SE 1/4 of SW 1/4 of Sec. 23; S.B.B.M. c. Address: N/A City: Fontana Zip: 92335 d. UTM: Zone 11; 455700 m Easting; 3769050 m Northing e. Other Locational Data: From the Citrus Avenue exit on the San Bernardino Freeway (Interstate 10) in Fontana, drive south approximately .3 mile to Slover Avenue. Turn right (west) on Slover Avenue and drive 1.5 miles to Live Oak Avenue, just past the Declez branch tracks of the Southern Pacific Railroad. The object is located just west of the 1920s store building that is on the northwest corner of Stover and Live Oak Avenues, near the north edge of Stover Avenue in a dirt parking area. *P3a. Description: The object consists of a rusted iron pipe approximately 4 inches in diameter and 8 feet high, projecting vertically from a cylindrical concrete footing 3 feet in diameter and 1 foot 6 inches high. A small -gauge pipe extends from the top of the iron pipe in a hooked shape. Electrical wiring is visible through a small access hole near the bottom of the iron pipe. *P3b. Resource Attributes: HP39 *P4. Resources Present: _ Building; Structure; X Object; _ Site; _ District; _ Element of District; _ Other P5a. Photo or Drawing: Original on file at Tetra Tech, Inc. 348 W. Hospitality Lane, Suite 300, San Bernardino, CA 92408-3216 PSb. Description of Photo: View of object, looking toward east-northeast, ca. 1928 commercial building at 14882 Stover Avenue in background (See continuation sheet). *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: _ Prehistoric X Historic _ Both *P7. Owner and Address: Unknown *P8. Recorded by: Tetra Tech, Inc., 348 W. Hospitality Lane, Suite 300, San Bernardino, CA 92408-3216 *P9. Date Recorded: 4/20/99 *P10. Survey Type: Pedestrian survey of both sides of Stover Avenue between Sierra and Cherry Avenues *P11. Report Citation: Cot:erman, Cary D., and Evelyn N. Chandler 1999 Cultural Resources Survey in support of Stover Avenue Improvements in and near Fontana, San Bernardino County, California. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc., San Bernardino, California for the San Bernardino County Transportation/Flood Control Department -Environmental Management Division, San Bernardino, California. *Attachments: _ None; X Location Map; _ Sketch Map; X Continuation Sheet; X Building, Structure, and Object Record; Archaeological Record; _ District Record; _ Linear Feature Record; _ Milling Station Record; _ Rock Art Record; _ Artifact Record; _ Photograph Record; _ Other *Required information DPR 523A (Rev. 1/95) A-1 <F:IDATA/ASR-FORM.CUL> 06/03/99 I2:40PM State of California The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS OF: RECREATION HRI # BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND 'OBJECT RECORD Page 2 of 4 *NRHP Status Code: 6Z *Resource name or No: (Assigned by recorder) Gasoline Filling Station Feature B1. Historic Name: N/A B2. Common Name: N/A B3. Original Use: Possible Lamp Post B.4 Present Use: Abandoned *B5. Architectural Style: N/A *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) The object may be the only remaining feature of a gasoline filling station indicated on a circa-1940s San Bernardino County Land and Water map (San Bernardino County n.d.). No other evidence of the filling station remains; its former location is now a bare dirt lot used as a parking area for the store on the northwest corner of Stover and Live Oak Avenues. The concrete footing rests on top of the ground surface, rather than extending below grade, therefore it is not known if the object is in its original location or has been moved. *B7. Moved? _ Yes X Unknown Date: Unknown Original Location: Unknown *B8. Related Features: None B9a. Architect: N/A b. Builder: Unknown *B10. Significance: Theme Commercial Development Area South Fontana Period of Significance 1920s-1940s Property Type Gasoline Station Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) The study area (Stover Avenue between Sierra and Cherry Avenues) was developed as agricultural property during the 1900s and 1910s. Residential development and a small amount of commercial development began in the 1920s. The commercial building immediately east of the gasoline filling station feature, at 14882 Stover Avenue, was built about 1928. The gasoline station may have been constructed at about the same time to provide automotive services to the growing number of local residents. The gasoline station would have been of local historical significance as part of the early commercial development along this portion of Stover Avenue; however, no trace of it exists other than the recorded object. Only a portion of the object, which may have been a lamp post, remains. This portion is badly deteriorated, and may not be in its original location. Because of its ancillary function and lack of integrity, the object lacks historical significance and is not eligible for listing on the California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR). It is being recorded because improvements to Stover Avenue, scheduled to begin in spring, 2000, will result in its destruction or relocation. B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP39: Gas station lamp post Sketch Map with north arrow required: See attached Map Sheet. *B12. References: San Bernardino County n.d. Land and Water Map of Stover Avenue from Etiwanda Avenue to Sierra Avenue. Cotterman, Cary D. and Evelyn N. Chandler 1999 Cultural Resources Survey in support of Stover Avenue Improvements in and near Fontana, San Bernardino County, California. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc., San Bernardino, California for the San Bernardino County Transportation/Flood Control Department -Environmental Management Division, San Bernardino, California. B13. Remarks: Stover Avenue improvements scheduled to begin in spring, 2000, will result in the destruction or relocation of this feature. *B14. Evaluators: Cary D. Cotterman and Evelyn N. Chandler, Tetra Tech, Inc. *Date of Evaluation: 4/20/99, 5/27/99 (This space reserved for official comments.) *Required Information A-2 <F:\DATA \CUL-FORM\BUILDREC.FRM > 05/24/95 11:22am State of California -- The. Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS OF RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET Primary No. HRI No. Trinomial Page 3 of 4 *Recorded By: Cary D. Cotterman *Resource name or No. (Assigned by recorder): Gasoline Filling Station Feature *Date: 4/20/99 X Continuation o Update Gasoline filling station feature, view to east-northeast, with ca. 1928 commercial building at 14882 Stover Avenue in background. Tetra Tech, Inc. photograph, 4/20/99 A-3 State of California — The Resources Agency Primary No DEPARTMENT OF PARKS OF RECREATION RI No. Trinomial LOCATION MAP Page 4 of 4 *Recorded By: Cart/ D. Cotterman *Resource name or No. (Assigned by recorder): Gasoline Filling Station Feature *Date: 4/20/99 X Continuation [] Update USGS Fontana, Calif., 7.5', 1980 LEGEND --Jra avaa Feature F;tY 0 SCALE IN MILES .5 1 W •' TN A-4 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Stover Avenue Phase Pavement Reconstruction / Widening / Curb -and -Gutter Installation Portion beginning at Poplar, west to between Beech and Hemlock In the County of San Bemardino and City of Fontana Prepared by Julie Gilbert, Senior Associate Planner San Bernardino County Transportation/Flood Control Department Environmental Management Division 825 E. Third Street, Room 127 San Bernardino, California 92415-0835 April 1999 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM This mitigation monitoring and reporting program has been prepared for use in implementing the conditions of approval for: Stover Avenue — Phase Pavement Reconstruction / Widening / Curb -and -Gutter Installation Portion beginning at Poplar, west to between Beech and Hemlock The program has been prepared in compliance with State law and the Environmental Checklist Form (Initial Study) prepared for the project by the County of San Bernardino. The California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resource Code Section 21081.6) requires adoption of a reporting or monitoring program for those measures placed on a project to mitigate or avoid adverse effects on the environment. The law states that the reporting or monitoring program shall be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation. The monitoring program contains the following elements: 1) The mitigation measures are recorded with the action and procedure necessary to ensure compliance. In some instances, one action may be used to verify implementation of several mitigation measures. 2) A procedure for reporting and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3) The program contains a separate Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Record for each action. On each of these record sheets, the pertinent actions and dates will be logged, and copies of permits, correspondence or other relevant data will be attached. Copies of the records will be submitted to the Land Use Services Department. 4) The program has been designed to be flexible. As monitoring progresses, changes to reporting procedures may be necessary based upon recommendation by those responsible for the program. As changes are made, new monitoring reporting procedures and records will be developed and incorporated into the program. Prepared 05/11/99 Page 2 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM MITIGATION MEASURE: 1. During construction, a water truck will spray the site daily, or more often as necessary, to control dust. IMPLEMENTATION AND VERIFICATION A. The contract with heavy equipment operators shall contain this provision. B. Transportation/Flood Control on -site engineers shall perform on -going inspections to ensure compliance with this measures. REPORTING RECORD WHEN REQUIRED: A. The contract with heavy equipment operators shall be reviewed and approved by the Land Use Services Department prior to construction. B. On -site inspections shall occur daily and on -going throughout the construction period. SUBMT1 l ED: DATE SUBMITTED: A) A) B) B) APPROVED BY: DATE APPROVED: A) A) B) B) INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: DATE: DATE: DATE: DATE: CORRECTION REQUIRED: (attach copies of correspondence) Prepared 05/11/99 Page 3 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM MITIGATION MEASURE: 2. An archaeological survey by a qualified archaeologist will be performed prior to construction to inventory all resources, to evaluate their significance and integrity and, if necessary, to propose appropriate mitigation measures. 3. The Department will submit a historical resources management report by a professional archaeologist to document the survey, to any subsurface testing, to document archival research, to evaluate resource significance and integrity, and, if necessary, to evaluate project impacts and to propose mitigation measures to mitigate potential adverse impacts in accordance with the appropriate laws. 4. If human remains are encountered along the project site, the Department and/or its contractor will notify the San Bernardino County Coroner's office within 24 hours of the find, and all work halted until a clearance is given by that office and other involved agencies. IMPLEMENTATION AND VERIFICATION A. Transportation/Flood Control Department shall contract with a County Museum -qualified archaeologist, prior to construction, to inventory all resources and propose appropriate mitigation measures, if required. B. The final report will be submitted to, and approved by, the County Museum. REPORTING RECORD WHEN REQUIRED: Prior to construction. SUBMITTED: DATE SUBMITTED: A) A) B) B) APPROVED BY: DATE APPROVED: A) A) B) B) INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: DATE: DATE: DATE: DATE: CORRECTION REQUIRED: (attach copies of correspondence) Prepared 05/11/99 Page 4 • 4 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM MITIGATION MEASURE: 5. The Department and/or its contractor shall prepare a Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures Plan (SPCC) that establishes best management practices for controlling releases and specifies procedures for cleaning up any accidentally released hazardous or toxic materials. IMPLEMENTATION AND VERIFICATION A) Transportation/Flood Control Department, Transportation Division shall ensure that its contractor submits the SPCC plan for this project for approval by the Environmental. Management Division at least 10 days prior to construction. REPORTING RECORD WHEN REQUIRED: 10 days prior to construction. SUBMr11'ED: DATE SUBMITTED: A) A) APPROVED BY: DATE APPROVED: A) A) INSPECTED BY: • INSPECTED BY: DATE: DATE: DATE: DATE: CORRECTION REQUIRED: (attach copies of correspondence) Prepared 05/11/99 Page 5 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM MITIGATION MEASURE: 6. All equipment shall be operated with required noise attenuation devices (such as mufflers) based on regulations in place at the time of use. 7. Heavy equipment will only operate between the hours of 7 a. m. and 6 p.m. IMPLEMENTATION AND VERIFICATION A. The contract with heavy equipment operators shall contain this provision. B. Transportation/Flood Control on -site engineers shall perform on -going inspections to ensure compliance with this measures. REPORTING RECORD WHEN REQUIRED: A. The contract with heavy equipment operators shall be reviewed and approved by the Land Use Services Department prior to construction. B. On -site inspections shall occur daily and on -going throughout the construction period. SUBMITTED: DATE SUBMITTED: A) A) B) B) APPROVED BY: DATE APPROVED: A) A) B) B) INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: DATE: DATE: DATE: DATE: CORRECTION REQUIRED: (attach copies of correspondence) Prepared 05/11/99 Page 6 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM MITIGATION MEASURE (Note: Added to accommodate Response to Comments): 8. Submit construction schedule to Omnitrans, Attention: Patrick Merrick, 1700 W. Fifth Street, San Bernardino, California 92411 at least 30 days prior to construction. IMPLEMENTATION AND VERIFICATION A. File transmittal of schedule with the Environmental Management Division of the Transportation/Flood Control Department. REPORTING RECORD WHEN REQUIRED: A. Prior to Construction. SUBMITTED: DATE SUBMITTED: A) A) B) B) APPROVED BY: DATE APPROVED: A) A) B) B) INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: DATE: DATE: DATE: DATE: CORRECTION REQUIRED: (attach copies of correspondence) Prepared 05/11/99 Page 7 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Stover Avenue Phase Pavement Reconstruction / Widening / Curb -and -Gutter Installation Portion beginning at Poplar, west to between Beech and Hemlock In the County of San Bemardino and City of Fontana Prepared by Julie Gilbert, Senior Associate Planner San Bernardino County Transportation/Flood Control Department Environmental Management Division 825 E. Third Street, Room 127 San Bemardino, California 92415-0835 April 1999 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM This mitigation monitoring and reporting program has been prepared for use in implementing the conditions of approval for: Stover Avenue — Phase I Pavement Reconstruction / Widening / Curb -and -Gutter Installation Portion beginning at Poplar, west to between Beech and Hemlock The program has been prepared in compliance with State law and the Environmental Checklist Form (Initial Study) prepared for the project by the County of San Bernardino. The California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resource Code Section 21081.6) requires adoption of a reporting or monitoring program for those measures placed on a project to mitigate or avoid adverse effects on the environment. The law states that the reporting or monitoring program shall be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation. The monitoring program contains the following elements: 1) The mitigation measures are recorded with the action and procedure necessary to ensure compliance. In some instances, one action may be used to verify implementation of several mitigation measures. 2) A procedure for reporting and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3) The program contains a separate Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Record for each action. On each of these record sheets, the pertinent actions and dates will be logged, and copies of permits, correspondence or other relevant data will be attached. Copies of the records will be submitted to the Land Use Services Department. 4) The program has been designed to be flexible. As monitoring progresses, changes to reporting procedures may be necessary based upon recommendation by those responsible for the program. As changes are made, new monitoring reporting procedures and records will be developed and incorporated into the program. Prepared 05/11/99 Page 2 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM MITIGATION MEASURE: 1. During construction, a water truck will spray the site daily, or more often as necessary, to control dust. IMPLEMENTATION AND VERIFICATION A. The contract with heavy equipment operators shall contain this provision. B. Transportation/Flood Control on -site engineers shall perform on -going inspections to ensure compliance with this measures. REPORTING RECORD WHEN REQUIRED: A. The contract with heavy equipment operators shall be reviewed and approved by the Land Use Services Department prior to construction. B. On -site inspections shall occur daily and on -going throughout the construction period. SUBMITTED: DATE SUBMITTED: A) A) B) B) APPROVED BY: DATE APPROVED: A) A) B) B) INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: DATE: DATE: DATE: DATE: CORRECTION REQUIRED: (attach copies of correspondence) Prepared 05/11/99 Page 3 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM MITIGATION MEASURE: 2. An archaeological survey by a qualified archaeologist will be performed prior to construction to inventory all resources, to evaluate their significance and integrity and, if necessary, to propose appropriate mitigation measures. 3. The Department will submit a historical resources management report by a professional archaeologist to document the survey, to any subsurface testing, to document archival research, to evaluate resource sign f cane and integrity, and, if necessary, to evaluate project impacts and to propose mitigation measures to mitigate potential adverse impacts in accordance with the appropriate laws. 4. If human remains are encountered along the project site, the Department and/or its contractor will notify the San Bernardino County Coroner's office within 24 hours of the find, and all work halted until a clearance is given by that office and other involved agencies. IMPLEMENTATION AND VERIFICATION A. Transportation/Flood Control Department shall contract with a County Museum -qualified archaeologist, prior to construction, to inventory all resources and propose appropriate mitigation measures, if required. B. The final report will be submitted to, and approved by, the County Museum. REPORTING RECORD WHEN REQUIRED: Prior to construction. SUBMITTED: DATE SUBMITTED: A) A) B) B) APPROVED BY: DATE APPROVED: A) A) B) B) INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: DATE: DATE: DATE: DATE: CORRECTION REQUIRED: (attach copies of correspondence) • Prepared 05/11/99 Page 4 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM MITIGATION MEASURE: S. The Department and/or its contractor shall prepare a Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures Plan (SPCC) that establishes best management practices for controlling releases and specifies procedures for cleaning up any accidentally released hazardous or toxic materials. IMPLEMENTATION AND VERIFICATION A) Transportation/Flood Control Department, Transportation Division shall ensure that its contractor submits the SPCC plan for this project for approval by the Environmental Management Division at least 10 days prior to construction. REPORTING RECORD WHEN REQUIRED: 10 days prior to construction. SUBMTI"1'ED: DATE SUBMITTED: A) A) APPROVED BY: DATE APPROVED: A) A) INSPECTED BY: • INSPECTED BY: DATE: DATE: DATE: DATE: CORRECTION REQUIRED: (attach copies of correspondence) Prepared 05/11/99 Page 5 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM MITIGATION MEASURE: 6. All equipment shall be operated with required noise attenuation devices (such as mufflers) based on regulations in place at the time of use. 7. Heavy equipment will only operate between the hours of 7 a.m. and 6 p.m. IMPLEMENTATION AND VERIFICATION A. The contract with heavy equipment operators shall contain this provision. B. Transportation/Flood Control on -site engineers shall perform on -going inspections to ensure compliance with this measures. REPORTING RECORD WHEN REQUIRED: A. The contract with heavy equipment operators shall be reviewed and approved by the Land Use Services Department prior to construction. B. On -site inspections shall occur daily and on -going throughout the construction period. SUBMITTED: DATE SUBMITTED: A) A) B) B) APPROVED BY: DATE APPROVED: A) A) B) B) INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: DATE: DATE: DATE: DATE: CORRECTION REQUIRED: (attach copies of correspondence) Prepared 05/11/99 Page 6 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM MITIGATION MEASURE (Note: Added to accommodate Response to Comments): 8. Submit construction schedule to Omnitrans, Attention: Patrick Merrick, 1700 W. Fifth Street, San Bernardino, California 92411 at least 30 days prior to construction. IMPLEMENTATION AND VERIFICATION A. File transmittal of schedule with the Environmental Management Division of the Transportation/Flood Control Department. REPORTING RECORD WHEN REQUIRED: A. Prior to Construction. SUBMITTED: DATE SUBMITTED: A) A) B) B) APPROVED BY: DATE APPROVED: A) A) B) B) INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: DATE: DATE: DATE: DATE: CORRECTION REQUIRED: (attach copies of correspondence) Prepared 05/11/99 Page 7 . CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT ProjeM.. 70#9t Contractorla,,vr►-n..w EQUIPMENT ANO/OR LABOR: R.port No. Day Da. /--2v -9 M T W F 9 9 Circle Day Shift Hours Start 'Cop HOURS - ITEM NO. EQUIPMT. NO. • NO. OF MEN DESCRIPTION (Of Equipment or Labor) /` 4.94 /D`[9S 7v- REMARKS (Reason for Idleness or other remarks) //y -Z2/ L /N S PGT/on/.' (-P/.. •'%.eXICT4/ /S Ur10'kin/ 4c,....-/ AA Gts/.41,/.►a.ri:.c l� J/G /? rf' '' ve.,,J- -/4 z -r "qe? ' e6 e, t�F. -r-A. ' C�� c5o..., ems' T-r/ A/p-c.itrc", //P,./ ;05"1-1,47.4i- _-r ect 4.4....i lrc- fly ,. ,?f��rl//A--r e,.�/ I FS'Ti ..pR / 7 • • Contractor t 2/92 JTIab CITY OF FONTANA INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT Report No. Day Date: 1— t. ' — 09 M it ® Th F S S Circle Day Shift Hours Start Stop: �{� t—r Hours • Item No. aul, Contractor. )ADIMAr.1 Remarks (reason for idleness or other remarks) EQUIPMENT AND I OR LABOR: No. Of Equipment No. Of Men Description (Of Equipment or Labor) (4sTc.,,,--- -1 coil -Mt "Moc44,_ 2 IL-L p• r c1 C_...0aa,9 s Contractor Title Inspe Sheet Of