Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
0850-72_Highland Haven Development Sewer Project - RDA_11.2
tr1011 40 O.I 41/ �,�,/ HIGHLAND/HAVEN Oct C✓ �Q��J 9 ee5 ER REIMBURSEMENT 645&/,,etj This Agreement is made and: en erd into this day of , 1993, by and between the City of Fontana ("City"),'a municipal corporation and the Fontana Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") a public body corporate and politic. � DRAFT RECITALS WHEREAS, Agency has constructed local and master planned sewer facilities vl ("Sewer Facilities") in that neighborhood known as Highland/Haven with North Fontana. Low/Moderate Income Housing Funds; and WHEREAS, as a condition of construction of the Sewer Facilities, City required Agency to construct a portion of the Sewer Facilities as master planned. sewer facilities; and WHEREAS, the Code of the City of Fontana, Chapter 26, provides that the City may reimburse Agency for construction of oversized or master planned sewer facilities in lieu of local sewer facilities and may reimburse Agency the pro rata share of the local sewer. facilities cost including partial house laterals for those properties that do not qualify for Low/Moderate Income assistance from Agency; and WHEREAS, Agency has spent an unaudited amount of $ of Low/Moderate 'r Income funds to construct the Sewer Facilities with partial house sewer laterals for the benefit of 335 properties; and WHEREAS, City proposes through its Sewer Capital Improvement Fund.(071) to'� reimburse Agency for upsizing local sewer facilities to master planned sewer facilities; and WHEREAS, City also proposes to collect and pay to Agency reimbursable Sewer'" Facilities construction costs at the time house sewer construction permits are issued for those properties served by the Sewer Facilities; and WHEREAS, reimbursable Sewer Facilities costs shall be waived for those properties verified by Agency as meeting Low/Moderate Income criteria; and WHEREAS, sewer availability to the Highland/Haven properties will not be available until City constructs the Baseline/Almeria Trunk Sewer Project. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants. contained herein, City and, Agency hereby agree as follows: GCM24460 Definitions. 1.1 "Agency" shall mean Fontana Redevelopment Agency, a public body corporate and politic. 1.2 "Agreement" shall mean this Sewer Reimbursement Agreement between the City of Fontana and Fontana Redevelopment Agency, dated , 1993. 1.3 "City" shall mean the City of Fontana, a municipal corporation. 1.4 "Code" shall mean the Code of the City of Fontana. we 1.5 "Highland/Haven" shall mean that neighborhood generally located west of Citrus Avenue, south of Highland Avenue, north of Walnut Avenue and east of Knox Avenue within the City of Fontana (Tract #3348). 1.6 "Project" shall mean the construction of local and master planned 0/ sewer facilities in Highland/Haven including construction of partial sewer house laterals as shown on Exhibit "A", attached hereto, and incorporated herein. 1.7 "Property" or "Properties" shall mean those 335 parcels of land within Highland/Haven which are serviced by the Project. 1.8 "Proportionate Share Cost" shall mean that share of construction costs attributable to each Property serviced by the Project. 2. Sewer Project Construction. 2.1 On December 31, 1992, Agency completed construction of the Project in Highland/Haven, which Project involved the installation of manholes, laterals, and gravity sewer mains, including one sewer main which was upsized to a City. master planned sewer facility in order to accommodate future development to the north of Highland/Haven. 2.2 During construction of Project, City, at Agency'sexpense, provided construction inspection and management services in order to ensure that all work performed by Agency's contractor on the. Project was performed in strict compliance with City approved plans, specifications and contract documents. Costs and Assessment of Fees. 3.1 Agency has. expended $ in unaudited North Fontana' Low/Moderate Income Housing Funds to cover all costs associated with construction and installation of Project 'including engineering, right of way acquisition, design, construction, surveying, soils testing, inspection,management and administration as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3.2' City and Agency's engineers have calculated that the difference in`' cost of constructing local sewer facilities and the cost of constructing master planned sewer facilities equals $111,238.51. • • DRAFT 3.3 City and Agency's engineers have determined that the unaudited cost of the Project less upsizing costs is $ of which 335 Properties in. Highland/Haven will share a direct pro rata cost. This sum is determined by dividing the above cost by the total number of Properties to be served (335) which results in a Proportionate Share Cost attributable to each Property of S,• 3.4 In accordance with the provisions of the Code, Section 26-31.1 to 26- d/ 31.6, the Proportionate. Share Cost charged to each Property as described in Section 3.3 above shall be adjusted for inflation pursuant to the Construction Cost Index noted therein. 3.5 Upon Agency's filing of the Notice of Completion for the Project and formal acceptance by City of the sewer lines into City's sewer system, Agency shall prepare a total actual cost bill for City's review and audit, and said total actual cost bill shall be agreed upon by City's Management Services Director and Agency's Executive Director. 3.6 Upon formal acceptance by City of Agency's total actual cost bill, City shall commence assessment of the Proportionate Share Cost attributable to each Property benefitting from the Project at the time Property owners apply for a house sewer construction permit. 4. Administration of Proportionate Share Cost. 4.1 Subsequent to connection of the Project to the Baseline/Almeria Trunk Sewer, City shall administer the collection of the Proportionate Share Cost attributable to each Property served by the Project, in keeping with Sections 26.31.1, 26.31.3 and 26.31.5 of the Code. 4.2 City shall refer each Property owner seeking a house sewer construction permit to Agency for confirmation of Property owner's annual income. 4.3 Agency shall verify to City in writing when a Property owner meets`/ Low/Moderate Incomecriteria and for whom payment of the Proportionate Share Cost should be waived so that City shall have no obligation to reimburse Agency for that Property owner's Proportionate Share. Cost. 4.4 Agency shall notify City in writing when a Property owner does not meet Low/Moderate Income criteria so that the Property owner shall pay to City his or her Proportionate Share Cost of the Project. 4.5 Collection of the Proportionate Share Cost for each Property under this Agreement shall be administered jointly by the Redevelopment and Housing Director for Agency and the Community Development Director for City to facilitate collection of Proportionate Share Cost payments by City and City's subsequent reimbursement of those payments to Agency. 4.6 At the time a Property owner applies for a house sewer construction permit, City shall assess the Property owner his/her Proportionate Share Cost which shall be posted by City directly to Agency's account. t`' b • 5. Timing of Reimbursement. 5.1 City shall reimburse Agency that portion of the total cost of the Project attributable to the difference in cost of constructing local sewer facilities and the cost of constructing master planned sewer facilities as provided for in Section 2.2 of this Agreement and Exhibit "A" from City's Sewer Capital Improvement Fund (071) within five years following the recordation of the Notice of Completion for. the Project and formal acceptance of the Project by the City or no later than June 30; 1998, whichever occurs last. 5.2 City shall reimburse Agency all Proportionate Share Cost funds collected by City from Property owners served by the Project by posting Proportionate Share Cost payments collected by City for house sewer construction permits for Properties served by the Project directly to Agency's account. 6. Term. de 6.1 This Agreement shall continue in full force and effect from and after the date of its execution until all 335 Properties to be serviced by the Project have connected to the Project and City has reimbursed Agency for all Proportionate Share Cost funds collected by City and all upsizing costs unless both City and Agency agree, and provide each party with thirty (30) days written notice of, the parties' intention to terminate this Agreement. 7. Entire Agreement. 7.1 This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties hereto 9 with respect to the matters contained herein, and supersedes all negotiations, prior discussions and preliminary agreement or understandings, written or oral. No waiver or modification of this Agreement shall be binding unless consented to by both parties in writing. 8. Notice. 8.1 All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be deemed made when delivered to the applicable party's representative as provided in this Agreement. Such notices shall be mailed or otherwise delivered to the addresses set forth below, or at such other addresses as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose: City: City of Fontana City Manager P.O. Box 518 Fontana, CA 92334-0158 G0424460 Agency: Fontana Redevelopment Agency Executive Director 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, CA 92335 WHEREFORE, this Agreement is executed this day of , 199_. CITY OF FONTANA A Municipal Corporation Gary Boyles41) Mayor of Fontana 4tt ATTEST: DRAFT Kathy Montoya Approved as to legal form: DRAFT Clark H. Alsop or Stephen P. Deitsch City Attorney DRAFT Greg Devereux Director of Redevelopment and Housing r ,,'•� Jennifer Vaughn Blakely Contract Compliance Officer r""‘- 7.AFT Robert A. Graham Risk Management FONTANA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY a Public Body Corporate and Politic T EXHIBIT "A' (TO BE CREATED BY AGENCY] G0124460 Final Unaudited Project. Cost Estimates for Highland/Haven Reimbursement Consultant Design Costs Consultant Plan Review Costs Construction Costs Consultant Surveying/Soils Test Costs Agency Staff Costs, including Legal Costs City Staff Costs, including Legal Costs Subtotal Less Sewer Upsizing Costs Desk. S. i /4 Aa Pro Rata Share for Each 335 Parcels GCM24460 Sewer $111,475.00 CITY OF FONTANA CALIFORNIA MEMORANDUM TO: BOB WEDDLE CITY ENGINEER FROM: MAGGIE PACHECO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT COORDINATOR SUBJECT: HIGHLAND HAVEN SEWER REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT DATE: JANUARY 20, 1993 Attached is a draft of a proposed Highland Haven Sewer Reimbursement Agreement. Prior to forwarding a copyto the Agency Attorney, I would like your review and comment so that any suggestions you might have are incorporated in the draft. Should you have any questions, please contact me (x6739) or Gary. Van Osdel (x7692) at your convenience. MP:GVO:cz ' 44-0.• f0 a cc.-- • 6 c 'A" �' "aP wa-a-r-ed i s-i C.04 a..� A @ /660 .� � 9 s . ��.rl�.�.�• %� r c✓i'c✓f' ok.e �/�`7 /-7 .tom✓ /77Z 9 /ya rLs .. » a i,� 0% o:d-1c. _ & , 9 -,.��. ,d'-• c e..ee ' "'el"."1 AC) I // j ac • f .z., --� �• a, .� G ., ee-� a---� . sum,. • C ALIFORNIA January 1993 Re: Completion of sewer & storm drain improvements in the Highland Haven Area North Fontana Redevelopment Project Area Dear Property Owner and/or Resident: We are happy to inform you that the local Highland Haven construction activities consisting of dry sewer lines and storm drains are complete. Although these local improvements are complete, the sewer lines and storm drains can not be used until the Baseline/Almeria Avenues master sewer line is completed. The Baseline/Almeria Avenues master sewer line will start on Baseline and Beech Avenues, go east to Almeria Avenue, then north on Almeria Avenue to Walnut Street. This master sewer line will allow Highland Haven Area residents to connect to the local sewer. The Baseline/Almeria `Avenues sewer line was originally scheduled to coincide with the construction of the sewers and storm drains in Highland Haven, however, due to. circumstances ":beyond the City's control, construction did not occur as originally planned. The circumstances that prevented the City from proceeding with the original Baseline/Almeria Avenues sewer construction schedule have now been resolved. Therefore, the City is pleased to inform you that there is a new construction schedule for the master sewer line. The construction bids are due in February 1993 and the construction contract will be awarded in March 1993. Assuming the contractor starts construction in March, the sewer line should be completed by August or September of 1993, at which time residents will be able to apply for sewer hook-up. The City will keep the residents apprised as to the progress of., the Baseline/Almeria sewer construction schedule.` We apologize for any inconveniences, and we appreciate your cooperation and patience. qn the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact Maggie Pacheco at (909) 350-6739, or Weldon Babino at (909) 350.6720 if you have any questions about this matter. Sincerely, Redevelopment and Housing Department,. C Gregory . Devereaux Redevelopment and Housing Director GD/MP:pd 8353 SIERRA AVENUE (P.O. BOX 518) • FONTANA, CALIFORNIA 92334-0518 • (714) 350.7600 SISTER CITY -- KAMLOOPS, B.C. CANADA CITY OF FONTANA CALIFORNIA MEMORANDUM TO: RICHARD COTA PRINCIPAL ENGINEER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RICARDO SANDOVAL ASSISTANT ENGINEER, LAND DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FROM: MAGGIE PACHECO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT COORDINATOR REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT RE: HIGHLAND HAVEN INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM NORTH FONTANA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA DATE: • JULY 2, 1992 As a follow-up to our meeting of June 15th, attached you will find the Program outline for the Highland Haven Area. Additionally, I am attaching a sample letter that will be sent to allresidents and owners some time in October 1992, advising them of the Program guidelines. The Program is being set up by myself in the Redevelopment Division, however, the actual implementation and owner application process will be administered by the Housing Division. Prior to the letter being sent out, I will set up a meeting for your group, Housing staff and myself to meet and confer about the actual Program structure. Should you need further information, call me at x6739. MP:cz attachment cc: Redevelopment and Housing Manager (DG) Deputy Redevelopment and Housing Manager (CL) Assistant Project Coordinator (WB) 1C4. Engineer (BW) io2t DRAFT b(AA0,C. , 1992 Dear Property Owner: As part of the implementation of the Housing and Infrastructure Revitalization Program for the Highland Haven neighborhood, the Fontana Redevelopment Agency is currently constructing sewers and storm drains. Subsequent to completion of these improvements you. will be able to a;ply to the City of Fontana for a peuait to connect your property to the sewer system under the following guidelines: 1. The total cost of the sewer system ($ ) has been divided by the number of benefitting properties (335 parcels) to arrive at a per parcel pro rata share of $ 2. Low and moderate income homeowners, whomeet the following income criteria and who desire to connect to the sewer system, will be able to apply to the Redevelopment Agency for financial assistance in paying their per parcel pro rata share and in paying the other costs associated with connecting to the system. STANDARD Low Income* Moderate Income* NUMBER OF PERSONS IN FAMILY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 20,150 23,050 25,900 28,800 31,100 33,400 35,700 38,800 30,250 34,550 38,900 43,200 46,650 50,100 53,550 57,000 3. Moderate occupant) meet all eligible * annual income at or less than amount shown income homeowners (absentee or owner and low income absentee homeowners, who other qualification criteria, will be for: Property Owner April 10, 1992 Page Two waiver of their pro rata share low interest loan or grant assis- tance to finance the cost of connecting to the sewer and pumping and filling the cesspool/septic tank (May also be used to finance the cost of the City's sewer connection right fee) 4. Low income owner occupants who meet all other qualification criteria will be eligible for: • waiver of their per parcel pro rata share low interest loan or grant assis- tance in funding the cost of connecting to the sewer and pumping and filling the cesspool/septic tank Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funded sewer connection right fee 5. Homeowners who do not meet the low/moderate income criteria will be required to pay their per parcel pro rata share and the City's connection right fee prior to receiving a permit to connect to the sewer system. 6. Owners of vacant land desiring to develop such land will be required to pay the City's connection right fee, their per parcel pro rata share, and all other applicable fees prior to receiving a building permit. If you are interested in receiving a determination of your eligibility for financial assistance, please contact the City of Fontana's Community Development Department, Redevelopment and Housing Division at (714) 350-7638 regarding application procedures. Sincerely, Don Gee Redevelopment & Housing Manager DG\aag prop_own.410 nfis&p.dsk AGENDA ITEM • REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION. REPORT SEPTEMBER 3. 1991 NEW BUSINESS Meeting Date Agenda. Placement TO: Chairman and Agency Members, FROM: Greg Hulsizer, Commun operirDriVector INITIATED BY: Don Gee, Redevelopment and Housing Manager ID: PREPARED BY: Maggie Pacheco, Redevelopment Project Coordinator 0 SUBJECT: Approval of the Financing Plan and Implementation Schedule Highland Haven in North Fontana Redevelopment Project Area v,t) CURRENT ACTION REQUESTED: r/3 MOTION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. FRA 91 , APPROVING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FINANCING PLAN AND IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE FOR THE HIGHLAND HAVEN TARGET AREA WITHIN THE NORTH FONTANA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (HOUSING AND INFRASTRUCTURE REVITALIZATION PROGRAM); AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO TAKE ALL APPROPRIATE ACTIONS IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT THE PLAN. Funding _ General ,�ck BUDGET IMPACT: 1_IQ1 No IYes Source: I_I Fund Budget �: ICI 28-2175 Fund Budget I_I Bond Proceeds I_I Developer Deposits This plan involves Redevelopment Agency expenditures of up to $3 million from its North Fontana 20% Set Aside Funds. Phase I Improvements are estimated to cost up to $1.9 million and Phase II improvements are estimated to cost up to $1 million. These are only estimates since the improvements have not been placed out to bid. Once the bids are received, precise cost can be determined. Additionally, the Agency may receive reimbursements from outside benefitting development and from property owners who do not qualify for the Program. ENVIROIIWNTAL IMPACT: II Yes I XX I No On June 5, 1990, the Redevelopment Agency adopted a Negative Declaration approving the 'Housing and Infrastructure Revitalization Program." This' program outlined the provision of various public improvements such as sewer, storm drains, streets, curbs, gutters etc., and rehabilitation and development of housing. i JUSTIFICATION: • • In July 1989, the Agency approved in concept a Redevelopment Housing Assistance/Enhancement Program within Redevelopment Project Areas and specifically authorized staff to initiate a Pilot Housing Program in the North Fontana Project Area. As a result, in September 1989, the Agency authorized Staff to retain the services of J. F. Davidson Associates, Inc. to ascertain the housing conditions and infrastructure constraints and deficiencies within the neighborhood of "Highland Haven' in North Fontana. On June 5, 1990, the Agency approved a- "Housing and Infrastructure Revitalization Program' for the Highland Haven area. The prime purpose of this Program is to revitalize and enhance a residential neighborhood suffering from physical, social and economic deficiencies and to further fulfill the requirements of the redevelopment law, wherein the Agency must utilize its 20% set aside funds to expand housing opportunities for low/moderate persons. Moreover, it is important to recall that this area was selected primarily because of its depressed and blighted conditions and lack of essential public improvements. The Program is intended to serve as a catalyst Pilot Program. Upon commencement and successful completion of this Program, it is intended to utilize and expand this Program for other areas such as the Downtown where there is also a great need to improve housing and infrastructure conditions. In June, when the overall Programwas approved by the Agency, the Agency directed staff to. prepare a comprehensive Financing Plan and Implementation Schedule to be brought back to the Agency for their consideration. • Attached for your review is the proposed Public Improvements Financing Plan and Implementation Schedule. In summary the Plan describes the following: - The Agency will advance and provide the funds necessary to implement the Programs from its North Fontana 20% Set Aside Funds of up to $3 million. - The Program involves construction of public improvements in two (2) Phases. Phase I :consists of construction of sewer lines inclusive of acquisition of necessary easements (this item is on tonight's City Council Agenda - if the Agency does not approve this Plan that item will be unnecessary), street repairs, and storm drains at the estimated -cost of $1.9 million. Phase II - consists of construction of street improvements such as sidewalks, curbs, gutters at the estimated cost of $1 million. Phase I is scheduled to commence April 1992.. Currently, the Agency overall Plan. Therefore, Phase II available, and the drainage issues Highland Haven. in November 1991 and be completed by has available up to $2 million for the will not commence until resources are are resolved to the immediate south of - The cost of the improvements will bespread over all of the benefitting parcels to arrive at per parcel pro-rata shares (estimated at $6,524 per parcel). This amount is subject to change depending on actual construction bids. The cost per parcel will be adjusted accordingly. - Those benefitSg property owners who meet thiriteria outlined in the Plan, can apply to the Agency for waiver of their pro-rata share. - Those benefitting property owners who do not meet the outlined criteria, such as owners of vacant property, will not be eligible to have their prorata share waived and therefore upon development must pay their share of the improvement costs. - The City Council will need to amend its sewer and storm drain Ordinances to increase the respective fee for this area only, to include the pro-rata share. - Those eligible property owners meeting the income criteria under the CDBG Program (80% of median income) will be eligible to obtain a sewer connection right ($1500). The CDBG Program recently purchased 150 sewer connection rights at $1500 per connection. These rights were purchased exclusively for Highland Haven residents who meet the income criteria. This summarizes the major key points of the Plan. Please refer to the attached Plan for further specifics. The Highland Haven Committee has reviewed the Plan, and generally is in agreement with the Plan. Accordingly, staff recommends approval of the Public Improvements Financing Plan and Implementation Schedule. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. FRA 91- 2. Financing Plan & Implementation Schedule 3. Map of Area REVIEWED BY: ennif Vaughn Assis ant City Manage DG:MP:lp rda mp.1 REVIEWED BY: P. I,1 Steve De tsc or Clark Alsop Agency Attorney RECOMMENDED BY: Russel A. Car sen Executive Director RESOLUTION NO. FRA 91- G3 A RESOLUTION OF THE FONTANA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FINANCING PLAN AND IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE FOR THE HIGHLAND HAVEN TARGET AREA WITHIN THE NORTH FONTANA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (HOUSING AND INFRASTRUCTURE REVITALIZATION PROGRAM); AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO TAKE ALL APPROPRIATE ACTIONS IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT THE PLAN. WHEREAS, Section 33334.2 of the California Health and Safety Code requires that not less than 20% of all taxes allocated to the Fontana Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") shall be used by the Agency for purposes of increasing and improving the community's supply of low and moderate income housing; and WHEREAS, Section 33334.2(3)(e)(2) of the California Health and Safety Code specifically authorizes the Agency to improve land or building sites with onsite or offsite improvements, if such improvements directly and specifically improve or increase the community's supply of low and moderate income housing; and WHEREAS, the provision of the proposed public infrastructure improvements will benefit a neighborhood predominantly comprised of low and moderate income persons; and WHEREAS, Section 33445 provides, that the Agency may, with the consent of the City Council, pay all. or part of the value for and the cost of the installation and construction of any building, facility structure, or other improvement which is publicly owned within or out of the Project Area, if the City Council determines the following: (1) That the facilities, and/or other improvements are of benefit to the Project Area in which the proposed Project is located; and (2) That no other reasonable means of financing such buildings, facilities, and structures, or other improvements, are available to the community. ' WHEREAS, the proposed project is consistent with the North Fontana Redevelopment Plan approved and adopted by the Fontana City Council by Ordinance No. 739 on December 21, 1982 and the City's General Plan adopted and approved on May 15, 1990; and Page 1 of 3 RESOLUTION NO. 11091- 63 I WHEREAS, as part of the North Fontana Redevelopment Plan the Agency certified the North Fontana Redevelopment Project Environmental Impact Report 82-2 per Resolution No. FRA 90-25 dated June 5, 1990 has adopted a Negative Declaration pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the activities described in the proposed Public Improvements Financing Plan and Implementation Schedule; and WHEREAS, it is necessary and appropriate that this Resolution be adopted; NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, determined, and ordered by the Fontana Redevelopment Agency as follows: Section 1. The Fontana Redevelopment Agency approves the Public Improvements Financing Plan and Implementation Schedule for the "Highland Haven Target Area' - North Fontana Redevelopment Project Area as outlined in Exhibit "A' of this Resolution. Section 2. The Fontana Redevelopment Agency hereby authorizes staff to take all the appropriate actions and expenditures necessary to implement said Plan. Section 3. The Fontana Redevelopment Agency hereby finds that said Plan is consistent with the North Fontana Redevelopment Plan and the General Plan of the City of Fontana. Section 4. The effective date of this Resolution shall be the date of adoption. ' Page 2 of 3 RESOLUTION NO. FRA 91- 63 • • APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of Sept. 1991. READ AND APPROVED: /s/ Stephen P. Deitsch Agency Attorney I, Kathy Montoya, Agency Secretary -of the Fontana Redevelopment Agency do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is the actual resolution duly and regularly adopted by the Fontana Redevelopment Agency at a regular meeting on the 3rd day of September, 1991, by the following vote to wit: AYES: Chairman Boyles, Members Abernathy, Eshleman, Murray NOES: None ABSENT: Member Kragness /s/ Kathy Montoya Secretary of the Fontana Redevelopment Agency /s/ Gary E. Boyles Chairman of the Fontana Redevelopment Agency ATTEST: /s/ Kathy Montoya Secretary Page 3 of 3 • • Housing and Infrastructure Revitalization Program Highland Haven Target Area Proposed Public Improvements Financing Plan and implementation schedule 8/16/91 The following information summarizes the proposed plan and schedule for funding and installing the sewer, storm drain and street improvements in Highland Haven. I. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION o The installation'of the publid,im rovements will occur in two phases. Phase I, involving the installation of sewers and a x'y storm drain . system, ls estimated to begin by November 1, 1991 and should be completed by March of 1992. Phase II, involving the installation of curb, gutter and sidewalk, will not be initiated until the first phase improvements are completed, there are sufficient'funds available and certain drainage issues existing to the south of the neighborhood have been resolved. o The Redevelopment Agency will finance the installation'of the Phase I public improvements with 20% tax increment set -aside housing funds, which, pursuant to State Law, are restricted in use to increasing and/or improving the City's supply of•low and moderate income housing. If it is determined to proceed with Phase II, these improvements may also be funded with 20% set -aside funds.• o In all likelihood not all of the owners of property which will benefit from the public improvements are of low or moderate income. Therefore, in order to assure that to the extent possible property owners who are not low/moderate income pay their fair share of the cost of the improvements, the Agency proposes: - to spread the cost of the improvements over all of the benefitting properties within the target area to arrive at per parcel pro -rats shares of such costs. - to request the City to amend its Sewer Ordinance establishing a separate sewer connection fee for Highland Haven consisting of the currant sewer connection right fee plus the par parcel pro-rata share of the total cost of the sewer improvement' payable by each owner. toevelop an' application pro ss to be used in concert with the City's sewer connection permitting process, to identify and confirm low and moderate income homeowners. - to waive the per parcel pro-rata share sewer fee for any low or moderate income homeowner (owner occupant or investor owner) desiring to hook up to the sewer and willing to execute and have recorded, a deed restriction on their property, restricting the use of such property to low/moderate income households. - to require that those homeowners not meeting the low/ moderate income criteria and owners of vacant parcels pay their connection right fee and their pro-rata share sewer fee in order to hook up to the sewer. - to request the City to amend the appropriate Ordinance(s) in order to levy a fee for the pro- rata share of the street and storm drain improvements as a condition of building permit issuance for any new development in Highland Haven. - to establish a method by which the City will turn over all pro-rata share fees collected within area to the Agency for deposit in the North Fontana Low/Moderate Income Housing Fund. II. PROGRAM CRITERIA o For purposes of this project the following definitions shall apply: - Area Median Income The median income for San Bernardino County as published from time to time by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. - Very Low Income Households - Persons or families whose income, adjusted for family size, is not more than 50% of the area median income. - Low Income Households - Persons or families whose income, adjusted for family size, is above 50% but does not exceed 80% of the area median income. - Moderate Income Households - Persons or families whose income, adjusted for family size, is above 80% but does not exceed 120% of area median income. 410 o Based on the median income for this area ($36,000) as determined by the Department of Housing and Urban Development for 1991, the current low/moderate income limits for this project are as follows: STANDARD Very Low Income Low Income Moderate Income NUMBER OF PERSONS IN FAMILY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 12,600 14,400 16,200 18,000 19,450 20,900 20,150 23,050 25,900 28,800 31,100 33,400 30,250 34,550 38,900 43,200 46,650 50,100 22,300 23,750 35,700 38,800 53,550 57,000 o Subsequent to completion of the Phase I improvements (on or about April 1, 1992) property owners will be able to apply to the City to connect to the sewer. Owners of vacant land will be charged the connection right fee and the pro-rata share fee prior to receiving a permit to connect. Homeowners will be referred to the Redevelopment Agency - Housing Division in order to determine eligibility for financial assistance. o Homeowners who do not meet the low/moderate income eligibility standards will be referred back to the City to pay the required connection right fee and pro-rata share fee prior to receiving a permit to connect. o Owner occupants, whose household income is 80% or less of the median income and who meet all other qualification requirements, will be eligible for: - CDBG funded sewer connection right. - waiver of their pro-rata share sewer fee. - CDBG low interest loan or grant assistance in funding the cost of connecting to the sewer and pumping and filling the cesspool/septic tank. o Homeowners (absentee or owner occupant) whose household income is greater than 80% of median income but less than 120% of median income and who meet all other qualification requirements, will be eligible for: waiver of their pro-rata share sewer fee. - 20% set -aside funded low interest loan assistance in financing the cost of connecting to the sewer and pumping and filling the cesspool/septic tank. (May also be used to finance the cost of the sewer connection right.) Aug. 1, Sept. 3, Sept. 17 Sept. 17, Oct. 15, 1991 Oot. 16, 1991 Oct. 22, 1991 o Subsequent to completion ompletion of the storm drain and street improvements ro Rrt owners of vacant land who desire to develop improvement p p y, will be charged their pro•rata share of these coats as part of their building permit requirements. III. INPLBm3NTATIOX somata Phase I June 5, 1990 Agency approves Housing and infrastructure Revitalisation Program for Highland Haven, adopts a Negative Declaration for the Program and authorizes staff to prepare a financing plan and implementation schedule. July 31, 1991 Completed sever and storm drain plans and ;speoificatis•.in final plan check. k J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. submits cost estimates and the preliminary per parcel pro- rata•shares of the improvement coats to the City. 1991 North Fontana Highland Haven Target Area committee' ' reviews . and approves proposed Financing Plan and Implementation Schedule. 1991 -City Council and Redevelopment Agency approve the proposed Financing Plan and Implementation Schedule. 1991 City Council and Redevelopment Agency approve the acquisition, of right of ray necessary to accommodate the ultimate linkage of the Highland Haven sever system viththe proposed sever line to the south. 1991 City Council approves sever and storm drain plans and: specifications and authorizes bidding of both. City conducts 'sewer and storm drain bid opening and awards contract(a). gen Agency theNorths an FontanaZ�iSet-asidete amount of funds a sever/storm drain construction count.into J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. calculates and submits final per parcel pro-rata shares of sever and storm drain costs. Nov. 1, 1991 Contractor(s)'Starts installation of sewer and storm drain improvements. Nov. 5, 1991 City Council amends Sewer Ordinance establish- ing a sewer connection fee for Highland Haven consisting of the current City connection right fee plus the per parcel pro-rata share of the cost of the overall sever project. Nov. 19, 1991 City Council amends Ordinance levying a fee for the pro-rata share of the storm drain improvements as a condition of building permit •issuance for any new development in Highland Haven. March 31, 1992' April 1, 1192 Aug. June 2, 1992 July 21, July 22, July Aug. 'Contractor completes sewer and storm drain improvements. City/Agency prepare to receive applications from Highland Haven homeowners for financial aid to assist in the purchase of sewer connection rights, the payment of per parcel pro -rate share sewer fees and the payment of the actual costs to connect to the sewer. Agency continues to concentrate housing rehabilitation efforts in neighborhood. Phase II 31, 1991 J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc.submits completed street plans and specifications to City with cost estimates and'preliminary per parcel pro-rata shares of improvement costs. . City. Council approves plans and specifications and authorizes bidding of street improvements. 1992 City. conducts bid opening and awards street improvement contract. 1992 Agency deposits an appropriate amount of funds from North Fontana 20% Set -aside Fund into a City street construction account. 28, 1992 J.•F. Davidson.Associates, Inc. prepares and submits final report of proposed per parcel pro -rats shares of the street improvement costs. 4, 1992 City Council amends Ordinance levying a fee for the pro-rata share of the street • improvements as a condition of building permit issuance for any new development in Highland Haven. Aug. 21, 1992 Contractor begins installation of street improvements. Dec. 31, 1992 Contractor completes installation of street improvements. IV. ESTIMATED PROGRAM COSTS (assumes construction will commence in late 1991) Phase I Sower $1,299,582 Storm Drain $ 746,359 Phase II Street Improve- ments $1,284,315 0. ESTIMATED PEA PARCEL PRO RATA SAES Phase I Sewer $ 3,922 Storm Drain $ 2,034 Phase II Street Improve- ments $ 3,499 i HH IMPW.SCH gvo <tgda> 09.20.91 Storm Drain Phase II Street Improve- ments HH IMPLN.SCH 08.01.91 per parcel pro rata share fee (361 benefiting lots) 1,900 (393 benefiting lots) 3,268 (393 benefiting lots) NORTH FONTANA HOUSING STUDY HIGHLAND HAVEN TARGET AREA t • Avg w& I a, I I1 CW110 Aw•06.• I • • .II i• ass • a • • STUDY AREA • IMy4 Av•• i 4 • E • . ra cc I- C) AVENUE _ _ Fiw•N 0O • • O w•r•1 • • • • • c 1101 10 SCAM ERSATIOP! RECORD OF TELEPHOI CONY CITY OF FONTANA Date -/7- 9z Individual /4)- % P Organization /Z D4- Job No. Project/$44006 2 D4- ,-/ Phone No. Items Discussed ,Pew rn.t,���� / �/f f� JG�/ /Gr ` /�/r/!9 � ?7 •445. G, . 'A ,1e,44 ca--A., 2 A Ord-//it/r Pyia vc G a-e/ae./ -a 4,= Gam. G%U,� _ s-� C i Comments or Action Required� //24-/ 41,9.r 7G c)' /1% / &c'-� // k.' %g‘ - ik)-D -re"). ,r4c,?' BSI-P006 2/80 • RECORD OF TELEPH0O. CONVERSATION CITY OF FONTANA Date Individual Organization Job No. By / C/.-.*I" Project Phone No. Items Discussed GPI- 2�t? ,74 Comments or Action Required BSI—P006 2/80 FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: CITY OF FONTANA 1/""42' Ca-`„ !v MEMORANDUM Ld (/�'`'��� "ve ' TO: DON.GEE, REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING MANAGER MAGGIE PACHECO, REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT COORDINATOR SUMMARY OF HIGHLAND HAVEN INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM MARCH 13, 1992 California co .cd ` A As a follow-up to ourdiscussion, below is a' briefing of the Infrastructure Program anticipated for the Highland Haven Community: The Program is scheduled to be performed in two (2) Phases: Phase I Phase I will consist of all sewer improvements thoughout the Neighborhood, and some dry storm drains. (see attached map depicting the improvements). Originally, Phase I was going to include some street work such as street overlay, curbs, gutters and sidewalks for Jacaranda and Los Cedros Streets. Presley was going to build a detention basin within their Project (Tract # 12314), south of the Highland Haven Tract, large enough to hold the run off from not only their project, but as well as the Highland Haven Tract. Presleys' project is now on hold, which means the detention basin is also. on hold. Presley wants the North Fontana Master Infrastructure Program to be completed before they move forward. Further, their is now a question as to whether the Planning Commission will allow them to construct this dentention basin since they will have to go through the design review process for their homes. The DRP will entail making a finding that the Project is consistent with the General Plan. Well, wouldn't you know it, the PC can't make this finding since Detention basins are not permitted per the General Plan. In any event, Kurt and I are working with Legal Counsel to get a written opinion to send to Presley on this matter. The other side of this, is that if the basin is allowed it will benefit Highland Haven. Presley contends that Highland Haven should share in the cost of the basin. JFD is reviewing Presley's calculations now to determine H/H share. However, Presley still is not ready to move forward. So, the main reason we redesigned the Highland Haven Program into two Phases was to allow for at least the sewer, dry storm drain to proceed. The most significant reason for Phasing the Project is due to the drainage issues. Currently, the Highland Haven tract drains south to the vacant area which is where Presley will eventually develop. SUMMARY OF HIGHLANgWAVEN INFRASTRUCTURE PROdORM PAGE 2 If curbs, gutters, sidewalks were constructed the drainage pattern would be altered at a more concentrated level. Bob Weddle, said that this legally cannot be done without mitigating the impact. What are the choices: 1) build an interim detention basin, or 2) phase the project so that this does not occur. Separately, in order for the Highland Haven Tract to have sewer the main trunk line needs to be constructed. As you know, Bob and I are working jointly; but Bob needs to get Presley to grant an easement to the City along Almeria which is the connecting point for Highland Haven. Bob, is currently preparing the Reimbursement Agreement between the City and Presley relative to the sewer, and the necessary easement documentation. Until Bob reaches closure on these two items with Presley he cannot place the trunk line out to Bid. He is working to resolve this within the next 2 weeks. Now, that Costs: I have said all this, here is the estimated Program A. Phase I 1. Construction Costs a. Sewers Construction Costs b. Dry Storm Drain Construction costs (plus 10f-contingency) Sub -total $ 2. Engineering, Surveys and Management Costs a. Construction survey work (includes phasing of plans) (JFD) b. Construction Soils testing (JFD) c. Construction Management & Administration (City Staff) d. Construction Inspection (City Staff) 3. Total Gross Project Costs Less Potential Reimbursements from City of Fontana 4. Total Net Project Costs C5Ic P/67/1 �wl 4 1,051,634 554,398 ✓ 160,602 D 1,766,634- 2� o�`2 o 70,984 o A= 18,700 11, 000-- o 47,000 U $ 1,914,318 4 - 123 ,860 lam' $ 1,790,458 SUMMARY OF HIGHLANG VEN INFRASTRUCTURE PRO PAGE 3 B. C. Note: 1. Phase II Phase II consists of street overlay, completion of storm drains, curbs, driveways, and sidewalks, etc. a. Phase II Construction Costs (includes 10% contingency) 2. Engineering, Survey and Management Costs a. Construction Survey - (JFD) b. Construction Soils Testing (JFD) c. Construction (Management & Administration (City Staff) 3. Total d. Construction Inspection (City e. Relocation Costs Project Costs Staff) JaeP[5'7'i 24,000 �"`- 21T y C, 12,000 11,000+ L/ 47,000+ �92,000 $1,108,829 Total Project Costs for Phase I & Phase II $2,899,287 • t;" re7Ea. ,e,.c_.-✓dam» z-� The above estimates do not include the costs expended to date by the Agency $419,900 (includes plans, engineering, (JFD) plan check (Webb) and street lights, (JFD). Does not include staff time for public works, or Agency. 'Construction Schedule My schedule anticipates resolution to the weeks. If so, here is Agency Schedule: Phase Advertise Bids Award Construction Commence Complete Construction Construction \�f Presley problems within 2 ?1,4 //� March 24, 1992 {v1-"„,), �""" Ap it 21, 1992 ' / Ma 4, 1992 44'-Sri October 1992 SUMMARY OF HIGHLANVEN INFRASTRUCTURE PROGIMM PAGE 4 Phase II Schedule is contingent on resolution of regional drainage issues. Highland Haven Committee Meeting I have scheduled a meeting for March 25, 1992 at 6:30 There are twelve volunteer committee members who are: Lovell Fleming Cheryl Anaya Helen Jackson Theodore Davis Rosa L. Hicks Doris Rush .Paul Porros Clarice Thomas Margaret Johnson De Ethel E. Jones Leotra Metoyer Margie Hill p.m. REIMBURSEMENTS TO THE AGENCY Please remember that the Program is structured so that the total Project costs are pro -rated amongst all benefitting Highland Haven parcels. For low/moderate income persons, their share could be picked up by the Home Improvement Program. If the owners do not meet the income criteria, they will have to pay their share of the costs when they pull a building permit. Gary and I will be working on the Sewer and Storm Drain Ordinance Amendment to include these additional costs. Please let me know if you need further information. MP:pd CITY OF FONTANA California MEMORANDUM TO: MAGGIE PACHECO, REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT COORDINATOR FROM: BOB MEDDLE, CITY ENGINEER DATE: JULY 18, 1991 RE: HIGHLAND HAVEN PROJECT As requested, the following are my comments on your 7/16/91 Implementation Schedule for the Highland Haven project. As I understand this project, it is for the first phase construction with "20% RDA set -aside money" paying for the work. The constructed works proposed to date will be the installation of sewers that will connect to my "to be constructed" Baseline/Almeria project (to be bid shortly), the installation of a "dry" storm drain system for connection to the future "Presley" system, and the overlay paving of the center street section which I understand is approximately 25 feet wide as noted on the attached cost sheet. Additionally, your project will acquire all permanent and/or temporary construction easements necessary for the project's construction and will have the property in "possession" at the time the City Redevelopment Agency awards the construction contract. If your division so chooses, and Greg Hulsizer concurs, I will provide my staff to act as Construction Managers to handle the construction contract administration, daily inspection, hiring and managing the consultants for construction surveying and monument replacement and materials testing. Just get me an RDA account to charge costs to. The issue of modifying the City Code Sewer Fund to collect a pro-rata or fair share connection fee from the property owners to pay for the sewer work could be based upon a program that set up the North Fontana Sewer Fee Account. I strongly recommend that this issue be heard/approved by the Council before a construction contract is awarded. This would give a few months to put the financial package together. Also, don't forget to handle the environmental process, i.e. Negative Declaration, etc. before we go to bid or award the construction contract. 4Maggi. Pacheco July 18, 1991 Page Two I am also concerned that the pro-rata cost sharing of storm drain and street work is actually an assessment district and if you want to get the RDA funds reimbursed you should get clearance from the City Attorney, as this may be more difficult than setting up the assessment district. If you have any additional questions on my notes on the attached or this memorandum, just give me a call at extension 7613. RWW:sh Attachment cc: G. Hulsizer F. Molinos C. Navarro J. Jamerson u:±,; 1'J 1-1-1 I I Hfl U'DLCL IU ! ; Jr 7:2 HfIH r, 02 July 31, 1991 1 '1/' eq August 1, �, August SaItoI ti October 1, 19 91. October 2, 1991' 06 ri October 8, 19919)4b://// November 1, 1991 �yyY November 5, 1991 • November S rS IMPLEMENTATION ICUEDULN 'e O/OO/ail J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. submits completed sewer and storm drain plans and specifications to City with the cost estimates and the preliminary per parcel pro-rata shares of the improvement costs. 20, 1991 City Council approves sewer and storm drain plans and specifications and authorizes bidding of both. 31, 1991 J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. submits completed street plans and specifications to City with cost estimates and preliminary per parcel pro-rata shares of improvement costs. City conducts sewer and storm drain bid opening and awards contract (s) . G/� / J�..•, �' 2= nvOy Agency deposits $xxxxxxxx from the North Fontana 20% Set -aside Fund into a sewn/storm drain construction account. �d per, c w`r�-��v� C• i4 r d4- // _j c,g ...., Ap 4. J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. calculates and submits final proposed per parcel pro-rata shares of improvement costs. Contractor starts installation of sewer and storm drain improvements.. City Council amends Sewer Ordinance establish- ing a sewer connection fee for Highland Haven consisting of the standard City connection fee plus the per parcel pro-rata share of the cost of the overall sewer project. 5, 1991 \ City Council adopts Ordinance levying a fee for the pro-rata share of the storm drain improvements on building permits for any new development in Highland Haven. March 31, 1992 St April 1, 1992 Contractor completes sewer and storm drain improvements. City/Agency prepared to receive applications from Highland Haven homeowners for financial aid to assist in the purchase of sewer connection rights, the payment of sewer connection fees and the payment of actual sewer connection costs. Agency begins to concentrate housing rehabilitation efforts in neighborhood. JUL-15-1991 U8: _0 FHUN FLUFY. UL6UN '•.'Hf i Li!=.1)t.L IU Lin' Jr r !N H- .H 7-1 1 Qe .July 28, 1992 (J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. prepares and submits final report of proposed per parcel pro-rata shares of the street improvement costs. nee" e G �� Cam.. . / •- S SG, is All-. use 2, 1991 ip)1'/ City Council approves plans and specifications and authorizes bidding of street improvements. S�o,�.r. pe✓�+`n (�-:e--dot s.-' ty{*�c. looms.-�-� July 21, 1992 City conducts bid opening and awards street improvement contract. yncIly 22, 1992 Agency deposits $xxxxxxxx from North Fontana 20% Set -aside Fund into a City street construction account. 7 August 4, 1992 City Council adopts Ordinance levying a fee for the pro-rata share of the street improvements on building permits for any new development in Highland Haven. August 21, 1992 Contractor begins improvements. December 31, 1992 /\ Contractor completes mprovements. impimntn.sch 07.12.91 see d e)e installation street installation of street - 7 9 ,, %.9'1 3 4/, y,,v Z(9•fo r 1 73, Z.3d sr /16tf,/0if- TrIToi 13 f.17 JUN 27 '91 10;12 JF DAVIDSON ASSOC • Q.P.O. yo;f 891 629-01 FILE: (MUNI. 1J0E91162901.YZ(( ENGINEER'S ECTIMATE " PRASE 1. CONSTRUCTION ae 'HORROR/IX NIORLAMD MAVEN - CITY OF FONTANA P.2/6 26-jU1-1991 Item Eat. Unit No. Itma • ription Standard Reference aty. Unit Cost TOTAL 19 TRANSITI• STRUCTURE N3. 3 48e R.C.'. TO 300 R.C.P. & 30' R.C.P. 20 TRAM5IT • STRUCTURE NO. 3 240 R.0 • TO 24' R.C.P, i 24' R.C.P. 21 TRANSIT • STRUCTURE NO. 3 360 R.0 ▪ TO 30' R.C.A. & 18' R.C.P. 22 INLET T V 23 JUMCTI• STRUCTURE MO. 24 25 UTILITY VERIFY LOCATICM, OEPTN & PROTECT IN PLACE 26 MAMMOLE NO. 4 40e R.0 P. TO 48e R.C.P. 27 mom ON RTRUCTUR! NM. 3 54' R.0 TO 43e R.C.H. 26 46' R. P. (1000-D) ' 29 30' R. ▪ (1200-0 ) 30 30° N. . (1100-D ) 31 26' R. P. (1200-0 ) 32 24' R. P. (1100-0 ) 33 TIMBER LACFCO 2-0188 1 E.A. $4,500.00 $4,500.00 LACFC0 2•D180 1 E.A. $4,500.00 $4,500.00 LACFCO 2-DINE 1 R.A. $4.500.00 $4,500.00 0.C.R.M.A. STD. 305 1 E.A. $3,000.00 $3,000.00 LACFCO 2-0193 2 M.A. s050.00 $1,700.00 LACFCO 2.0113 LACFC0 2-01ER l.A. 14,000.00 s6.000.00 E.A. $4,500.00 $4,500.00 85 L.P. $104.00 $5,840.00 396 L.P. $65.00 $25,570.00 31 L.F. $60.00 52,015.00 60 L.P. $60.00 $4,080.00 112 L.P. $60.00 $6,720.00 14 E.A. $250.00 . 13,500.00 SUB TOTAL: $326,625.00 MOBILIZATION (105): $32.662.50 CONTINGENCY (105): $32,662.50 s /0-is"g/ • . G TOTAL::j $391,950.00 stU uA jUN 27 '91 10:13 JF DAVIDSON ASSOC • P.3/6 me.4 691 01 MAL DRAMI.ED 4 ime91162901.92( EMEIREER'S ESTIMATE ** Pus! 1 ComsTRUcTIOM ** STORM DRAIN MIGRLAMO MAVEN - CITY OF FONTANA 26-411171591 Item Mo. Item riptice Amt. Unit Standard Refarence Qty. Unit Coot TOTAL 1 60" R.C. . ( 1000-D ) 2 54* R.0 . ( 1000-0 ) 3 440 R.0 . ( 1300-0 ) 4 42N R. . ( 1000-0 ) 5 4SP t.0 .. ( 1200-1) ) 6 360 R.0 . ( 1100-0 ) 7 300 R.c . ( 1400-0 ) 8 24" R.0 . (1300-0) 9 160 R.0 P. ( 1300-0 ) 10 MANHOLE 60" R.0 11 MANHOLE 54" R.0 12 MULE 540 R.0 13 MO. 4 P. TO 48" A.C.F. & 301 A.C.P. NO. 4 . TO 54N R.C.P. & 30" R.C.P. 00. 4 P. TO 42" R.C.P. & 460 R.C.P. MO. 4 425 R.. P. TO 36" R.C.P. & 240 R.C.P. 14NO. 4 36" R. P. TO 36" R.C.D. &IS* E.C.P. 7 L.O. $160.00 $1,120.00 391 L.V. $120.00 S46,920.00 439 L.F. $104.00 S43,656.00 397 L.F. $87.00 134.339.00 363 L.F. 110.00 129,040.00 392 L.F. $70.00 $27,440.00 37 L.F. $65.00 $2.405.00 113 L.P. $60.00 $6,780.00 90 U. S30.00 S4,500.00 LACFCD 2•0113 1 O.A. $6,000.00 $6,000.00 LJLICII 2-0113 1 C.A. $6.000.00 $6.000.00 LACFCO 2-0113 1 E.A. $6,000.00 $6,000.00 LACFCD 2..0113 1 LA. $6,000.00 S6,000.00 LA01421 2-0113 1 E.A. s6,000.00 $6,000.00 15 MO. 1 10011111Cr. LAM2-0102 NCOIF. 30m R. P. /0 241 24m R.C.P. DITAIL 01 SNIP m 16 TRANI ON STRUMS MO. 3 30" R. P. TO 24" R.C.P. 241 I.C.P. 17 J.INCT1• STRUCTURE NO. 2 45" .P. TO 48m R.C.P. $ 24m R.C.P. .18 U. LACFCD 2-11111 LACPCD 2-0112 C.A. 11,000.00 $5,000.00 1 I.A. $4,500.00 $4,500.00 2 E.A. $4,900.00 S9,000.00 JUN '91 10.13 JF DAVIDSON ASSOC 410 411 Lou st.d20/w20 APRIL 24, 1991 P.4/6 CITY OF FONTANA SEWER IMPROVEMENT PLANS PHASE I TRACT 3348 HIGHLAND HAVEN PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE ITEM DEscRIPTIoN ESTIMATED UNIT UNIT TOTAL QUANTITY PRICE COST 1. SEWER, 11,060_ L.F. $20 $221,2 0 ' • 2. SEWER 8,815 L.P. $30 $264,4 0'. 3. 1" SEWER 1,797 L.P. $70 $125,7 0 4. (8"x4") WYES * 287 EA. $41 $11,7 7': 5. (21115E4") NIES ** 48 ' EA. $435 $20;.6 CO: 6. (4' O.D.) MANHOLES 28 EA. $2 000 $56,0 0 7. (5' O.D.) MANHOLES 9 EA. $2,500 $22,5 0! 8. OUTS 1 EA. $1,500 $1,5 0: • 9. 1" PIPE STUBS 1 EA. $500 10. 8" PIPE STUBS 1 EA. $100. 11. OIN EXIST. M.H. 1 EA. $900 12. CONCRETE ENCASEMENT 84 L.P. $20 ...... 4.64611.P.m.......mbOW1116.mwolimoorMIImodagi.w ....— ........ TOT SEWER SUBTOTAL co NGENCY e. 10% P • CT TOTAL ** *** 2.50 LENGTH OF 'PIPE INCLUDED 6.00 LENGTH OF PIPE INCLUDED BASED ON A 20' WIDE TOP 'OF TRENCH DIMENSION $727,2 7. $72,7 7! $799r 4' EEC SIONS S COST .ESTINATE DOES NOT INCLUDE SEWER IN CITRUS AVENUE. GUT OF WAY COSTS FOR WAIIIUT STREET ARE NOT INCLUDED. '1 ____ P.5i6 • CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY Assoam 'F 141.4ss I - Sr a Zr a M P .o., a> aTS . d v eriZt.A '1 f Project ftle 4 r2414 t~ Awri 1-4 Pit v 01 Date Sty wC 2.'1t `i`►1. i Lucatior SW Go a-,.tda. C. V T ZS $ /. 1T `t d %• cz.•4T 4 r+s•A t1 t G U t. FI p 1econCapttlar Project Ito. 041 ►ir (s2.R -O $ Estimated By 'D. F-41L..L. Checked By Q. Preliminary Q Final -- Construction Cost Estimate Summary Item ( Na. onaiptien �T Total Cost 0 v A"' n /....4-1 • s..-r LA AA Z=Ce— 6i -rift\ 44.-m. -r01.1 ---- TA m 'QP / IQ-/ 'Rct t. GTiInN NTS , ,X -SF.CT1ai0 bOt.At �4Zi�4. y T2.*3 4 1 t m ti—r 1.R./...7=` R( f a l 1' G81:V..S I,lalZ.V` A.Ly‘ _2..t,o. 2� 3'73 Gi4"r is. w'p.A (Srx r1 9,2 34_ GAeor-04• w % ; Ciane,�t t) 44 Q 7 Tii"e.r4.c.h.-ana 1 5 c 0 . . L 4r6Zr t c azYpt • I 5-1 a ._. 'TOT A e✓ 1,5 O 7 Q qt _ v e t_..Le..tc . .7-. ys4t11~X t r1'l n Es 9 % e 414 7 4. ' 7 o • • O Ovga..1-4-t --c.0 .S %T%f 1 +4. 63'441:3 = 0.0 72TehdV 414 O Ov E ti i.4-I-t-o..:. s = &72 9.544plyQ'lFS-S15 '�f�7�. 9Qr4• y JUN 27 '31 10:15 SF DA\i-,IDSON ASSOC • J.F.D. 10.0 B91 FILE:PNASE1_,SIP 629-01 • ENGINE'* ESTIMATE *a' PMASS 1 CONSTRUCTION ** STREET IMPROVEMENT HIGHLAND HAVEN - CITY OF ICNTANA • 27-A11-1991 it go. it alossamm=== 1 4N AC MOTET THIS UNIT PR ACTUAL ABOVE ription Est. , Unit Standard Refers:no* Qty. Unit Cast TOTAL T. .' REPAIR / AGPSALT OVERLAY =====imm============.11 6990 TN. $30.00 s2o9,700m SUB TOTAL: S209,700.00 MOBILIZATION (10B): 120,970.00 CONTINGENCY (10%): 120,970.00 TOTAL: $25144044 MATE DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY COSTS FOR RELOCATION AND/OR REW0VAL OP ANT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS. CIS USED IN TNIS COST OP:HIOM ARE ?RI RECENT BID RESULTS OF COMPAXABLE TYPE PROJECTS. RUCTION COSTS WILL EU DETERMINED FROM TNIS INICUECIS ITO PRICES UNICE NAY DIFFER FROM TNE T OPINION. P.6/6 • ,,,z/6#4A1V0 .4 v Q 6. PARTIA4. DE \ :17 —ti‘Wgt&;2NE t u 4 .�........ u I. • ,'GATA /4, ; t; 7A1IUMl iv i11141111404It211 • ■M 0 • _. ss�.s.► O:La`��s.. J P....N 31 4 i ZXeI d44 $ *e'uirrv. t ,✓,vo7 ,oF /Nr-424r'7�?p 6Y'ac , S701.40i44tiv "Del/ AD/ICO7b77TIa • PET A /N • OFFSITE OFFSITE ONSITE SKETCH SHOWING AREAS TO ESTABLISH POST DEVELOPMENT FLOWS TO DESIGN RETENTION BASIN IO' d (700. ON Zy : c.T T6` I I InC ZT90S28 TL oN 131 ONI' :'31HIDOS'SH 3370Cd. O I 2 3 . 3 4 7 11 10 11 /t 1571 /5793 (sI 5113 1531 I,Sd33 ISi91 is23s1 13%1 dip I �74 �'Sg1 it ft 5'g* IS8)-6 15816 ,5iYy 15zby rs$r 1�392 1s0 13r, 132 I 153 154 I36 17i H7 131 51 160 1510 - 15.31v as e ... ort✓'v' 371 . -- 1 ItACAN1 no 0 g �� 372 6511 361IS • .1- _ a.. G,591 b6io Oi 376 f''T,„ 7 ® V NT 376 601$ 36f 6419 $ 377. 3N tU T •.. 6 "'VAN+uY ip O . 371 Gba1 362 G4Y� rbst Gbs�. 3M 360 36t v, m rr G669 s31 .4zo ® 3R3 ,,c,9.rT G67�1 336 66So 36» -. 64arry�515i JACAuT 337 ®7 Sr :L'—. ® 36s a . . 335 . .. _ .) 367 VAC.,., 331 I-'�. ® 310 VAC -Parr 6735 V 333 U c,11y © 361 VA LA oT (Z33 VPANT 332 ® 1 D -1111n1y313 6T3aOva. , © 351 G,153 330 0 C916°. Sft 34 0 67 0 348 4 p : ' 314 1 Are G721 347 •q L�.,• 84) N'S tt {,59q vRe�uf • . 327 313 r.c,o3 fall 326 317 Cs( G(,19 333 310 6671 WO 341 6733 342 AU i 343 IVAc©�'' t11 --1«ol'ror N IS 15yi4 161 162 VACIWT ar O 34I � o • -c 2M t67 it iPtv+t en do tf2 267 G115 -734 v 11 L438 71 76 11i fi t5913 15913 17131 15941 S5sI115439 I596c SSEPTic TAN K Took ups I, 0 UACA11T 16 CPI. 171 t. "6*"TIIIL.S.(8'" t G 2 ITh in 0 vrr TI 70 .5937 15411 2 2 I so • 314 555 yaGq*+t • 317 354 ® 511 555' 5 . 4 © Dn 15t vAtAi,/r 033 -r too ._y 151 3_ la 331 D07 005 70V ChIJ e 343 30t 6 03 It IJ 10 71 71 5a73 15Q.09'4B3 15913 159./3 O N la .11 g 35 I1 6744 17 posy tilt) t5I (.7 5 bicY t57 251 41 V. rr „ 15191 tS451154.71 SaPTiC. TANK Noo'C ups • 160 15l1lO 15yi4 i5914 g 13'd III 112 163 144 323 I.322 u0 1i6571 32N 321 58I c,sfl 5q II 6510 1----i 327 310 •03 66e9 3t6 317 i13 6619 3211 316 /LA 330 b31 331 ,i,51 61,51 333 yGL 334 333 U 7y 336 -19 312 • in J (a 1 309 1.1 6t,sa Raj roc , 9B 1 330 5 343 344 13 63 „8 3y 76 7t 15913 ISO, IS y66 5.116 IV IV to 4661 �1460 - t/3 61144 y1.70 t17 262 di 0074 (k4o T tM el Gag g14'11 elf t/0 t60 t/! �.} L705 41o1 so no 47)q - ® tN 26/ 0 675i_yn52. \INAwr !ft to •0 L76LE 'O- . 1)PLM1^1f or an V C711L10: Flotai� nob •,T 0 47$I G1E�' ..mvACR ,% • II 76 15191 S5s1 SEPTIC TAN K Hoot` up5 VACRv �sa tar 71 ,sA. ; Atp NTOi ; 5 7 i .� . 014) • 11111 G225 G54o no enVAc ® • 65Q9 655,2, n,. t31 tt . no ■Gcrs 4y/y m 220 6o3 cG414 tl6 6631 1431, tlt SW 44y) Con -- • t1Y 7 t17 t 11 VPC�*�( • I6(1 t46;. t36 t13 • 66o 6 67o 237 214 to GLa7 tca� 0 to tor V1 O 6699 4G?v VRur ©; to _6yo V ®1. . tM t06 642- Q12 y too 6733 :in 61 3347 0 tI DX G151 475?, H6 MI t£Iyt(,7Go. t+t 80/ VAC• w i •4171 ;11o' ' yr c€T mot 203 p •IC m.o. 4'781 47,1o.n• ,% 15937 6445 N 1 [yo41 JC051 a /con N616—A6.1111r'I Oka Ul NIr16o6'6ow f6 Oda L- I esmordno Courtly 228• L IKIILAMD AK. 24 Q 0 7� 1 ' • • 1 HIGHLAND HAVEN INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS (SEWERS AND DRY STORM DRAINS) PHASE REVISED IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE March 27, 1992 Plans and specifications approved for bidding by City Engineer April 6, 1992 Bid package completed. Copy of plans and specifications to City Clerk, Dodge Report, and ACI Building News. Bid notice mailed to Daily Construction Service, Building News, Contractor's "Hot Sheet" and to the Contractor's List. April 29, 1992 Bid opening date June 2, 1992 Award construction contract June 15, 1992 Preconstruction conference June 16, 1992 Notice to Proceed issued to Contractor June 17, 1992 Letter to residents July 1, 1992 Groundbreaking. Contractor begins work on sewer and storm drain improvements October 1, 1992 Staff prepares to receive applications from Highland Haven homeowners for financial aid to assist in the purchase of sewer connection rights, the payment of per parcel pro-rata share of sewer and storm drain construction costs; payment of the construction costs to construct sewer lateral lines. October 15, 1992 Letter to owners December 31, 1992 Contractor completes sewer and storm drain improvements. hh-001.aag 4.1.92 NFIS&P.dsk • • DRAFT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING OF THE FONTANA CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS BY THE FONTANA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR SEWER AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE HIGHLAND HAVEN TARGET AREA (NORTH FONTANA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA) Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Fontana (the 'City Council') will conduct a public hearing pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 33679 concerning the expenditure of funds by the Fontana Redevelopment Agency for proposed sewer and storm drain improvements within the Highland Haven Target Area, generally located immediately south of Highland Avenue east of Citrus Avenue. The time, date and place of the public hearing are as follows: Date: June 2, 1992 Time: 7:00 p.m. Place: City Council Chambers Fontana City Hall 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, CA 92335 The proposed project has previously been reviewed as part of the Housing And Infrastructure Revitalization Program approved for the Highland Haven Target Area on June 5, 1990. On that same date, a Negative Declaration was adopted for the Program pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. In addition, the activities proposed as part of this project are referenced in the certified Environmental Impact Report 82-2 for the North Fontana Redevelopment Plan, which will be relied upon by the City Council in considering this matter. Pursuant to the requirements of California Health and Safety Code Section 33679, a Summary Report, indicating the estimated cost of construction of the proposed sewer and storm drain improvements has been prepared. A copy of the Summary Report and the Negative Declaration are on file in the office of the Community Development Department, Redevelopment and Housing Division, City Hall, 8353 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, California and are available for public inspection during normal business hours. Any person interested in this matter is invited to appear before the City Council for the public hearing at the above time, date and place and to submit evidence and testimony concerning the matters described in this Notice. Date: Note to Press: Publish on -- Send proof of publication to: Fontana Redevelopment Agency c/o Maggie Pacheco 83B3 Sierra Avenue Fontana, CA 92335 citycncl.rpt nfis&p.dsk HIGHLAND HAVEN INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM PHASE I - SEWER AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS REVISED STAFF AGENDA DEADLINES Agency/City Council Meeting Date May 19. 1992 (Agenda items and Notice to Press due to Tina by 4/27/92.) Attach Notice of Public Hearing to Agenda Item June 2. 1992 (Agenda item due to Tina by 5/11/92.) June 16. 1992 (Agenda item due to Tina by 5/22/92.) July 7. 1992 (Agenda item due to Tina by 6/15/92 September 5. 1992 Action Set Public Hearings (1) City Council consent for Agency to expend tax increment. (2) City Council to amend sewer and storm drain ordinances. (1) (2) (3) (1) City Council Public Hearing consenting to tax increment expenditure. Agency awards construction contract. Agency modifies JFD contract for surveying and Phase Work. City Council Public Hearing on proposed sewer and storm drain ordinances. (1) City Council conducts 2nd Reading of Ordinances amending sewer and storm drain fees for the Highland Haven per rata share. (1) Amended Sewer and storm drain Fee Ordinances take effect. Publish the June 2nd Notice of Public Hearing in the and in the Sun newspaper on 6/1/92. Publish the June 16th Notice of Public Hearing in the and in the Sun newspaper on 6/11/92. Herald newspaper on 5/28/92 Herald newspaper on 5/28/92 hh-022.aag nfis&p.dsk CITY OF FONTANA California MEMORANDUM TO: SEE DISTRIBUTION FROM: SUBJECT: HIGHLAND HAVEN TARGET AREA COMMITTEE - MEETING OF MARCH 25, 1992 RECEIVED CITY ENGINEERS OFFICE MAGGIE PACHECO, REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT COORDINATOR DATE: APRIL 6, 1992 The following Meeting Notes, and attachments are being transmitted to you for your review and to keep you abreast of the discussions going on. Distribution: Community Development Director Redevelopment and Housing Manager "City Engineer Principal Engineer Crime Prevention Specialist Building Inspector Associate Housing Coordinator Assistant Planner North Fontana Highland Haven Target Area Committee Meeting Notes March 25, 1992, Wednesday I. Prayer by Clarice Thomas II. Roll Call: See attached Sign - In Sheet III. Unfinished Business * Status/Phase I Improvements Maggie Pacheco passed out the Revised (3/29/92) Implementation Schedule for Phase I and went over the key dates. Construction is anticipated to commence in June 1992 with a completion schedule of January. 1993. - Dorothy Grant noted that jobs are needed for the community residents and requested some language be placed in the bid documents extending job opportunities for community residents. Maggie Pacheco said some generic language will be put into the Specifications. Paul Porras noted that letters informing residents about construction activities and program criteria should be written in spanish as well as english. - The committee members were quite pleased with the schedule, and encouraged the scheduling of a ground breaking. * Code Enforcement - Maggie Pacheco handed out the list of properties currently being monitored by Building & Safety/Code Enforcement. This information is primarily provided to apprise the committee of the properties that need to be improved or, cleaned up. Also to let the committee know that Phil Saldana is the Building/Code Enforcement Inspector assigned to the area, and if there are any problems residents should contact Phil. Dorothy Grant brought up the COPS Program and said the Police Department was going to look into eliminating the alleys. The alleys would be divided. and given to the respective property owners. IV. Confirmation of next meeting- April 22, 1992 Wednesday 6:30 - 8:30 p.m.' ** Staff will send out notice of the meeting. ** a 04.64 North Fontana Highland Haven Target Area Committee March 25, 1992, Wednesday 6:30 p.m. SIGN -IN SHEET - Name & Address Phone No. e ¢ 6s7/ CVg2L-5-Z/ a79 406 Ate P.72-W roZ / -4z-/Lx--6/ 2,21:5-3 (,ftf .Lr 904 61,/ 35- Crr'l Dr r„,,,T- 4Wr4 3SO-L1.70 z/A.e.17A/ caSe•-:0T-6 /,l 3-5o - 66C6 .5-j FONTANA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY North Fontana Highland Haven Target Area Committee March 25, 1992, Wednesday 6:30 - 8:30 P.M. Jessie Turner Center 6786 Citrus Avenue Fontana, California AGENDA I. Prayer II. Roll/Call Introduction (members & guest) III. Unfinished Business * Briefing of Highland Haven Public Improvements- Phase I sewer and storm drains. Code Enforcement IV. Oral and Written Communications V. Confirmation of dates and time of next meeting VI. Adjournment • • HIGHLAND HAVEN INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS (SEWERS AND DRY STORM DRAINS) PHASE I REVISED IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE March 27, 1992 Plans and specifications approved for bidding by City Engineer. April 7, 1992 Bid advertisement submitted to all newspapers. April 10, 1992 Bid advertisement appears in all newspapers. April 13, 1992 Bid package completed. Copy of plans and specifications submitted to City Clerk, Dodge Report. and ACI Building News. Bid notice mailed to Daily Construction Service, Building News, Contractor's. "Hot Sheet" and to Contractor's List. May 1, 1992 June 2, 1992 June 3, 1992 June 10, 1992 Bid opening date. Award construction contract Notice to Proceed issued to Contractor Contractor starts work on sewers and storm drain improvements. July 1, 1992 Staff, prepares to receive applications from Highland Haven homeowners for financial aid to assist in the purchase of sewer connection rights, the payment of per parcel pro-rata share of sewer and storm drain construction costs; payment of the construction costs to construct sewer lateral lines. January 1, 1993 Contractor completes sewer and storm drain improvements. 3/24/92 MP:pd BUILDING AND SAFETY/CODE ENFORCEMENT STRUCTURES BEING MONITORED 6688 Catawba - Abandoned House (Demolition) 6614 Tokay - Dilapidated Garage (Demolition) 6641 Cherimoya - House Damaged by Fire (Demolition) 15581 Highland - Old Airport (Must Secure) 9965 Maloof - Trash and Dilapidated House (Demolition) 6742 Tokay - (Unsafe building with people living in it) 6725 Jacaranda (Garage/Trailer in back yard) Phil Saldana, Building Inspector City of Fontana. (714) 350-7640 3/25/92 PS/MP:pd • NMI MIMI= = .� �. — m — ' = = J. F. Davidson Associates, Ammer emr January 17, 1992 MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING DIVISION Ms. Maggie Pacheco CITY OF FONTANA REDEVELOPMENT DEPT. 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, CA 92335 nc. RE: MEETING MINUTES FOR MEETING OF JANUARY 9, 1992. Dear Maggie, 8911629-01 Thank all of you for attending the above referenced meeting. J. F. Davidson Associates, Inc. felt that this meeting was necessary and that all parties are now working under the same understanding. The following attended: Ms. Maggie. Pacheco Mr. Robert Weddle Mr. Felipe Molinos Mr. Weldon Babino Mr. Jon B.Sebba Mr. Jim Oravets City.of Fontana Redevelopment City of Fontana Public Works City of Fontana Public Works City, of Fontana Redevelopment J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. Discussion began with JFD's proposal to phase the North Fontana project..✓ Jim outlined Option II of the proposal. This option eliminates the overlay from phase I construction. ▪ Bob explained the cost benefits of proceeding under this phasing option. Maggie stated that time was getting to be more important than money. Jon stated that option would cost less to design and to construct. • Jim reviewed. the project target dates included in the proposal and Maggie asked how this schedule matched the City's schedule for the Almeria/Baseline sewer. Felipe confirmed that JFD's schedule for the North Fontana. Project proceeds the Almeria/Baseline sewer by only a couple of weeks. The contractor will be required to "drag a shield" through the trench to support the sidewalls. The utility trenches will be vertical to the height of the 3426 Tenth Street • P.O. Box 493 • Riverside. CA 92502 • (714) 683-0209 • FAX 714-686-5807 ::SYS$SYSDEVICE: [MUM.JAMESO.JAMESOW P]LEWER.AG3; I IJAMESO t� PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Ms. Maggie Pacheco January 17,1992 Page 2 1 shield, then flair to 2:1 for deeper_ trenches which exceed the height of the shield. The attendees reviewed the plans to estimate how much pavement removal there would be. It was determined that with the exception of Los Cedros and Almeria, a good contractor could limit the amount of pavement removal and replacement. It was agreed by all parties that JFD should stop work on the Phase II plans and proceed with preparing a bid package for the sewer, storm drain and trench repair only. JFD will proceed under our current contract amount(substituting thephasing for the same dollar amount of contract funds remaining). Maggie will provide a letter to Jill stating that she will approves the proposal and willask council for the extra in the near future. The approved extra amount is $ 71,000.00 which includes $ 51,000 00 for construction surveying. Bob agreed that the storm drain phasing could be accomplished by notations on the existing plan set. JFD to provide the City with 80 scale mylars The;City: will prepare the signing and striping plans on the mylars provided, and they will be included in the contract documents for Phase II. Bob stated that after JFD completes the Phase 11 plans, they can sit on the shelf until Maggie acquires the funding to complete the construction The Phase I. plans.: willbe:submitted directly to the City Engineer for signature when complete. Webb has completedtheir review of phase I and has approved the plans; Felipe asked if as-builts were included in the JFD contract. :Jon stated that .,: they were not: Bob said that it is possible that theCity,will be -able to provide'them at a later date, if necessary 11 ` Bob stated that he would like: to receivea diskette for the additional spec set • that will sit on the shelf with the Phase II` plans with a copy on disk in Word perfect 5.1.; ::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[MUM.JAMESO.JAMESOW P]LETTER.AG3; 1 IJAMESO Ms. Maggie Pacheco January 17, 1992 Page 3 12..' Maggie questioned the extent of "bid assistance" which is in the JFD contract. Jim stated that this includes 20 bid sets and assistance in answering contractor questions. Bob said that the City could probably handle the majority of the questions, however, JFD should provide assistance. 13. The City will sell the bid sets. 14. JFD surveyor should attend the pre job meeting. J.F.Davidson is proceeding with the project based on the above mentioned understanding. Should any items be misrepresented or omitted, please advise the undersigned at (714) 683-0209, extension 146.: Sincerely, J. F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES. INC. /James A. Oravets Project Manager: ::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[MUM.JAMESO.JAMESOWP]LE1TER.AG3;11JAMESO CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 1. Will be given specs to type. Determine cost of specs and plans. Minimum of $10.00, with additional charge depending on number of sheets of plans & specs. 2. Project has to go to City Council for approval to put project out for bid. 3. In setting a date for the bid opening, keep in mind that Wednesday before Council meeting (Council meetings are the 1st and 3rd Tuesday of the month) is agenda day, so if possible, have bid opening prior to agenda day so there will be time to type recap of bids. Tell City Manager's secretary bid opening date to reserve Council Chambers for that date. 4. Once City Council has approved project, start distribution of specs and flyers according to list below: Who Gets Specifications and Plans: Who Gets Flyers - First 2 Pages and Engineering Estimate: 1. City Clerk 1. Daily Construction Service 448 S. Hill St., Suite 818 2. F. W. Dodge Los Angeles, CA 90013 202 E. Airport Dr., Suite 130 San Bernardino, CA 92408 2. Building News 3055 Overland Avenue 3. ACI Building News Los Angeles, CA 90034 464 S. Sierra Way San Bernardino, CA 92408 3. Contractors active in this type of project. 4. Inspector 4. Contractor's "Hot Sheet" P.O. Box 4145 Riverside, CA 92514 (include (Including listing of items as shown in proposal) 5. Send flyer (2 copies of flyer) along with purchase requisition to Purchasing Department for advertising in Herald News. 5. In additionto the four sets of plans and specifications prepared for distribution to the above, prepare ten sets for our front counter. Number all sets beginning with City Clerks. Prepare a sheet to keep under counter with plans and specs to be sold. Number sheet so that a record can be kept of all sets of plans and specs distributed (contractor's name, address, telephone no. should be filled in beginning with set five. 6. Write Purchase Requisition for Herald News for advertising. (Needs to start 3 weeks before bid opening date--2 ads one week apart.) Attach 2 copies of flyer to Purchase Requisition and submit to Purchasing Department. 7. When bids are opened, engineer in charge of project will write up bids in order of low bid to largest, and secretary will then type a recap of bids. Need four copies of recap of bids --one for cover sheet for agenda item, one for "Bid Tabulation" folder, one copy for project folder, and keep one copy in file basket for reference. 8. Can prepare contract and accompanying letter and put in suspense file for use day after City Council meeting where approval is given for the awarding of the contract. (The contract is in the specs packet and a sample letter to accompany the contract is attached.) 9. After approval by City Council, send contract to successful bidder with letter requesting bonds and insurance certificate (as per attached sample). 10. When returned from bidder (contract, bonds, and insurance certificate) check to be sure that bonds are 50% each of the amount of bid. If the bonds are correct, write memo to City Clerk and tell her she may now release the bid bonds sheis holding. Send copy of the memo to Finance and tell them that they may release any cash bid bonds which they are holding. (see attached sample of memo) 11. The contract must be signed by the City Attorney, Mayor, and City Clerk. Then a copy of the fully executed contract is returned to contractor for his files. (see attached letter of transmittal). IJ J. F. Davidson Associates, Inc. = =sr®, MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING DIVISION - December 23, 1991 891'1629-01` Mr: Robert Weddle CITY OF FONTANA PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. 8353; Sierra Avenue P.O. Box 518 ^Fontana, Ca: 92334-0518 MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER "20, 1991:', ear Bob;;' The following represents our' understanding of the' above mentioned meeting It.is worth note that this project was begun prior to Mr. Weddle's return to the City Of Fontana, and that he was not involved in the foundationsof establishing this project. Some items mentioned are not contract' items, and this letter will attempt to distinguish between' contract and non -contract items, for your benefit . The attendance was as follows. !' Mr Robert Weddle City of Fontana Public Works Mr Wally Franz Webb Associates, Inc Mr. Felipe Molinas City of Fontana Public Works Mr. ':Weldon :Babino City of Fontana Redevelopment Mr. Jon B. Sebba J. F. Davidson Associates, Inc` Mr. Jim Oravets J. F. Davidson Associates, Inc: Bob` Weddle. requested the support' documentation of the designcriteria established for phase I of the Highland Haven project. His concern is clarification of 20' curb radius, 8" curb height,4 5' sidewalk, etc . -Jrll will provide what is available Striping and signing plans.' Cityof Fontana will prepare on 80 scale base sheets provided byJr1). The City would ike copies of the utility letters sent out: by JFD: Bob would 'like,JFD to send out the improvement plans to the utility companies to red line: 3426 Tenth Street •,P 0 Box 493;• Riverside; CA 92502 • (714) 683-0209 • FAX 714 686-5807, SYS$SYSDEVICE:[MUNI:JAMESO.JAMESOW 'aLETTER.AF7;11JAMESO • CA PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Mr. Robert Weddle December 23,1991 Page 2 4. Bob is concerned that JFD and Webb walk the site. Jim Oravets stated that JFD has, but would accompany Webb should it be necessary. Bob asked for the soils report, Jim said it would be included in the spec package. Bob asked if the "R" Value was recommended by the soils engineer. Yes. The street section call -out on the construction notes states 4"AC over 12"AB. This is a mistake, the section is 4" AC over 12" compacted native. The section for Los Cedros indicates agg. base, and should be revised. 6. Sheet 8 of 8, delete note No. 11 in plan view. Bob stated that wider sidewalks might be required based on the minimum recommended wheel chair clearance maintained by the state. 8. Bob requested that the plans make reference to the signing/striping plans to be prepared by the City. 9. Add a typical driveway detail on page 2, indicating the horizontal location of the driveways for the vacant lots. Indicate the width of the driveways (typical) either on the plans or in the specs. Submit the driveway profiles to the Public Works Department. 10. The question of the 20' curb radius was raised. The City does not have a copy of the letter Felipe sent JFD on January 14, 1991 requesting the use of the tighter radius in lieu of requiring right of way. JFD will supply a copy. 11. Indicate the State right of way at the intersection of Highland and Catawba North. 12. Bob would like to see a barricade at the terminus of Almeria. It was decided that the barricade should be placed at the tract boundary before the temporary knuckle. 13. Bob stated that the City requires a cleanout, just inside the property line, for the sewer laterals. Bob would like our laterals to terminate within the right of way. A detail is required in the specs or on the plans for the lateral. This detail should establish the depth of the terminus of the sewer lateral. ::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[MUNLJAMESO.JAMESOWP]LET1'EK.AF7; I IJAMESO Mr. Robert Weddle December 23,1991 Page 3 14. The space provided for the drawing numbers in the title block should be kept blank, so the City can add at a later date. Our work order is currently occupying that space, and should be removed. 15. Bob stated that the existing facilities should be labeled as "protect in place","relocate", or "remove and replace". Jim stated that this can be easily added to the plans in the form of a note, however, JFD has not included this to date pending the status of the relocation proposal. JFD felt that for a project of this nature, the usual labeling method mentioned above, would not be adequate. Our proposal was to provide a detailed plan including video taping the facilities. We will proceed based on this meeting by adding the typical notes (above) to the plans. Our relocation proposal can now be disregarded. 16. The status of the documents for the Walnut (offsite) was in question. Maggie will provide a copy to JFD. Bob is not sure whether the City should build the temporary knuckle at this time given the situation with the Presley tract. 17. Bob stated that the sewer trench detail on the title sheet of the sewer plans should be revised to eliminate the alternate option. The contractor will be required to trench and shore vertical sidewalls, dragging a metal shield for support. 18. Bob would like the specs to require the contractor to backfill his trenches daily, except where concrete structures require curing. 19. Sewer laterals should be measured as "each" not "linear feet" in the specs. 20. Avoid sewer laterals in driveways whenever possible. Jim stated that the laterals were place in the locations provided by the City as a result of the survey completed by the property owners. 21. Indicate the construction easement limits on the Walnut sewer. The City was not sure of the actual width of the temporary easement, and would supply JFD at a later date. ::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[MUNLJAMESO.JAMESOWPILETTER.AF7;11JAMESO Mr. Robert Weddle December 23, 1991 Page 4 22. Bob reviewed an old proposal for the next stage of engineering services. This proposal was included in the original proposal and outlined the scope and fee for the following items: Construction Management Construction Survey Inspection He was unclear as to the actual breakdown. Jim stated that JFD had submitted a separate proposal for construction survey only, and would provide Bob a copy. 23. The specs have allowed for a 160 calender day construction period, and Bob would like to reduce that to 120 calender days. Jim stated that this will increase the construction costs. 24. Bob stated that the ultimate design was fine, however, the phasing has to be decided prior to bidding the project. Jim stated that JFD had previously suggested that the phasing be accomplished by making duplicate mylars and indicating the limits of construction on the duplicate set. The design would still be constructed from the original plan sets. Bob further suggested that JFD actually prepare two separate, additional plan sets with separate design and limits on the plans respectively. The construction would be performed from the new plan sets. Jim explained that phasing is not a contract item and that an extra is required. Our proposal for phasing was kept to a minimum based on the assumption that the City did not want to spend a lot of money phasing the project. Jim will provide Maggie a new proposal based on this latest request. Jim will also provide Bob a sample of how the phasing will be performed. 25. A bid item for a fictitious drain and curb outlet should be provided in the spec, to establish a good unit price should the drains be required in the construction phase. ::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[MUM.JAMESO.JAMESOWP]LETTER.AF7;1IJAMESO Mr. Robert Weddle December 23,1991 Page 5 J.F. Davidson is proceeding with this project based on the above mentioned understanding. Should any items be misrepresented or omitted, please advise in writing as soon as possible. Sincerely, J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC. James A. Oravets Project Manager cc: Attendants Ms. Maggie Pacheco - City of Fontana Redevelopment Dept. ::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[MUNI.JAMESO.JAMESOWP]LETTER.AF7;1IJAMESO ORIGINAL AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC. MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING DIVISION This is Amendment No. 1 to the original Consultant Services Agreement dated November 6, 1990, between the Fontana Redevelopment Agency and J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. for consultantservices related to additional infrastructure design and engineering services as part of the implementation of the Housing and Infrastructure Revitalization Program for the Highland Haven Target Area in North Fontana (Phase II). The Consultant Services Agreement is hereby amended as follows: A. Section 1 - Services of the Consultant Provide the additional services noted on Exhibit "Au - Scope of Work attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. B. Section IV - Fees and Payments 1. Compensation Consultant shall receive as additional compensation for all services rendered under this Amendment No. 1 up to an amount of not to exceed $184,650. C. Section II - Responsibilities of Consultant 4. Time of Performance The tasks to be performed by Consultant under and pursuant to this Amendment shall be performed within the time frame noted in the original Consultant Services Agreement dated November 6, 1990. All other provisions of the Consultant Services Agreement dated November 6, 1990 shall remain in effect. Payments shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions of the original Agreement. Page 1 of 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have accepted and made and executed this agreement upon the terms, conditions, and provisions above stated, the day and year first above written. FONTANA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public body, corporate and politic READ AND RECOMMENDED BY: Executive Director Russell A. Carlsen Dated: Department Recommendation: artment Head Insurance Reviewed: Insurbnce Compliance l�a•c ontrac ry Comp lance Offic APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL CONTENT: Agency Attorney CONSULTANT J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc By: Title: are�s�s/dSNT Dated: 4r — +e - 9i I.proposalslfontanalnfraPhase2Des.w20 15-JAN-1991 04:41:37 PM EXHIBIT 'A• SCOPE OF WORK FONTANA INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN PHASE — Ph&sl. it COST ESTIMATE FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES PERSONNEL : Princ. Project Civil Field Drafter Clerk : Subtot. Subtot. Other Estimated : Enp'r Manager Des. Inspect Techn : Labor Labor Direct Total • . Hours Cost • Street K-sections TASK 1 DESIGN SURVEYS ▪ 2 8 8 0 80 2 : 100 $6,200 S17,000 S23,200 (CROSS-SECTION STREETS AND PAVEMENT SURVEY) • NT'GS• TASK 2 MEETINGS (NONTNLY) 10 : 20 40 60 0 12 20 : • 152 S13,060 $50 S13,110 TASK 3 UTILITY COORDINATION 4 24 40 0 24 12 : 104 S8,120 $100 S8,220 TASK 4 SOILS INVESTIGATION 1 4 8 0 0 2: 1S $1,295 S16,000 S17,295 TASK 5 DESIGN AND COST ESTIMATE SHEETS 5a STREET IMPROVEMENTS 18 : 10 93 489 0 489 10 : 1091 S81,340 $100 S81,440 Sb STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS 3 : 4 20 92 0 92 4 : 212 S15,860 S100 S15,980 TASK 6 REPRODUCTION 0 0 8 0 0 0: 8 S720 S750 $1,470 TASK 7 RID ASSISTANCE 4 12 16 0 0 2 : 34 S3,150 S50 $3,200 TASK 8 ASSESSMENT APPORTIONING AND MAP 16 0 60 0 40 8 : 124 $9,880 $100 $9,980 TASK 9 ASSISTANCE WITH 1-0-W ACQUISITION : 96 10 11-0•W DOCUMENTS 0 8 40 0 40 4 : 92 $6,700 S100 $6,800 9b WALNUT STREET R-0-W DOCUMENTS ▪ 0 3 24 0 24 4 : • SS S3,905 S50 $3,955 TOTAL • 61 212 845 0 801 68 : 1,987 S150,250 S34,400 $184,650 • NOTE There is no provision for potholing of utilities or for surveying potholed utilities, included in this estimate. J.F. Davidson Associates, In.. CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT (Engineering Services - Highland Haven Infrastructure Project) THIS AGREEMENT is made this 6th day of Nov. , 1990, by and between the FONTANA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public body, corporate and politic, of the State of California, located at 8353 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, California 92335, County of San Bernardino (hereinafter "Agency"), and J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc., Municipal Engineering Division, (hereinafter "Consultant". WHEREAS, the principal members of Consultant are Jon B. Sebba, Director, Water & Wastes Group, and WHEREAS,' Agency desires to engage Consultant to provide engineering services to develop plans and specifications to design sewers, roadways and storm drains for the Highland Haven target area within the North Fontana Redevelopment Project Area. NOW, THEREFORE, AGENCY AND CONSULTANT MUTUALLY AGREE THAT: SECTION I SERVICES OF THE CONSULTANT General Description of Services. Consultant shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof so as to fully and adequately complete their project described herein. SECTION II RESPONSIBILITIES OF CONSULTANT 1. Personnel. All the work shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision. The Consultant represents that it possesses the professional and technical personnel required to perform the services required by this Agreement. Agency retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and Consultant is not an employee of the Agency. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of services under this Agreement and as required by law, shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting them, including but not limited to, Social Security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, and workers' compensation insurance. 2. Cooperation. Consultant shall work closely and cooperate fully with Agency's designated Project Administrator, and any other agencies which may have jurisdiction or interest in the work to be performed. 3. Project Manager. The Consultant shall assign the project to a Project Manager, who shall coordinate all phases of the project. This Project Manager shall be available to the Agency at all times. The Consultant has designated Jon B. Sebba, Director; Water & Wastes Group, to be its Project Manager. 4. Time of Performance. The task to be performed by Consultant under and pursuant to this Agreement shall be completed within 120 180 days from the above -stated date and more specifically in phases as noted on the Schedule of Engineering Services attached hereto as Exhibit "A". Consultant shall receive no additional compensation if completion of its obligation under this Agreement requires a time greater than as set forth herein unless such extension is caused solely by the conduct of the Agency. Each party hereby agrees to provide timely notice to the other of any violation occurring under this section and the cause thereof. 5. Report Materials. At the completion of this project, Consultant shall deliver to Agency all documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, and reports prepared by Consultant under this Agreement. Said documents shall be considered the property of Agency upon payment for services performed by Consultant. 6. Agency Policy. Consultant will discuss and review all matters relating to policy and project direction with the Project Administrator in advance of all critical decision points in order to ensure that the project proceeds in a manner consistent with Agency goals and policies. 7. Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All work prepared by Consultant shall conform to applicable Agency, county, state, and federal requirements and be subject to approval of the Project Administrator and the Agency. 8. Indemnification.Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend, save, and hold harmless Agency, its officers, agents, and employees from and against all liability, claims, damages, losses, and expenses for damages of any nature whatsoever including, but not limited to, bodily injury, death, personal injury, property damages, and attorneys' fees directly arising from any and all negligent actions of Consultant, its employees, agents, or subcontractors pursuant to this Agreement. Such indemnity shall not apply to any injuries to persons or property which result from the sole negligence of the Agency. 9. Standard of Care; Licenses. Consultant represents and agrees that all personnel engaged in performing services are and shall be fully qualified and are authorized or permitted under state and local law to perform such services. The Consultant shall perform the services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner. The Consultant shall be responsible to Agency for any errors or omissions in the execution of this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants to Agency that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications, and approvals required of its profession. Consultant further represents and warrants that it shall keep in effect all such licenses, permits, and other approvals during the term of this Agreement. 10. Insurance. Without limiting Consultant's indemnification of Agency, Consultant shall obtain and. provide and maintain at its own expense during the term of this Agreement policy or policies of liability insurance of the type and amounts described below and satisfactory to the Agency Attorney. Such policies shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf and must be filed with. the Agency prior to exercising any right or performing any work pursuant to this Agreement. Said policies shall add as insured the Agency, its elected officials, officers, and employees for all liability arising from Consultant's services as described herein. A. Prior to the commencement of any services hereunder, Consultant shall provide to Agency certificates of insurance with original endorsements, and copies of policies, if requested by Agency, of the following insurance, with Best's Class B or better carriers: (1) Worker's compensation insurance covering all employees and principals of the Consultant, in a minimum amount of $1 million per accident, effective per the laws of the State of California; (2) Commercial general liability insurance coveringthird party liability risks, including without limitation contractual liability, in a minimum amount of $1 million combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. If commercial general. liability insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate shall apply separately to this project, or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the occurrence limit; (3) Commercial auto liability and property insurance covering any owned and rented vehicles of Consultant in a minimum amount of $1 million combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. B. Said policy or policies shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by either party, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior notice has been given in writing to Agency. Consultant shall give to Agency prompt and timely notice of claim made or suit instituted arising out of Consultant's operation hereunder. Consultant shall also procure and maintain, at its own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its own judgement may be necessary for its proper protection and prosecution of the work. C. Consultant shall include subcontracting consultants, if any, as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverage for each subcontractor shall be subject to the requirements stated herein. 11. Prohibition Against Transfers. A. Consultant shall not assign, sublease, hypothecate, or transfer this Agreement, or any interest therein, directly or indirectly by operation of law without the prior written consent of the Agency. Any attempt to do so without said consent shall render the Agreement null and void, and any assignee, sublessee, hypothecatee or transferee shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation, or transfer. B. The sale, assignment, transfer, or other disposition of any of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Consultant, or of the interest of any general partner or joint venturer or syndicate member or co -tenant if Consultant is a partnership or a joint venture or a syndicate or a co -tenancy, which shall result in changing the control of Consultant, shall be construed as an assignment of this Agreement. Control means fifty percent (50%) or more of voting power of the corporation. 12. Progress. Consultant is responsible to keep the Project Administrator and/or his/her duly authorized designee informed on a regular basis regarding the status and progress of the work, activities performed and planned, and any meetings that have been scheduled or are desired. 13. Confidentiality. No news releases, including photographs, public announcements, or confirmations of the same, of any part of the subject matter of this Agreement or any phase of any program hereunder shall be made without prior written approval of the Agency. The information which results from the services in this Agreement is to be kept confidential unless the release of information is authorized by the Agency. SECTION III RESPONSIBILITIES OF AGENCY 1. Cooperation. Agency agrees to cooperate with the Consultant on the project. 2. Agency's Responsibilities. Agency shall furnish to Consultant base maps, existing studies, ordinances, data, and other existing information as shall be determined by Consultant and materials in Agency's possession necessary for Consultant to complete the work contemplated by this Agreement. Agency further agrees to provide all such materials in a timely manner so as not to cause delays in Consultant's work schedule. 3. Administration. This Agreement will be administered by .the Redevelopment Division. The Redevelopment Manager or his/her designee shall be considered the Project Administrator and shall have the authority to act for the Agency under this Agreement. The Redevelopment Manager or his/her authorized representative shall represent the Agency in all matters pertaining to the services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement. SECTION IY FEES AM PAYMENTS 1. Compensation. Except as provided in this section, Consultant shall receive as compensation for all services rendered under this Agreement an amount not to exceed $162,000 and at the rates set forth in Exhibit "B". The total project cost shall not exceed this amount unless additional work is requested in writing by the Agency. Agency shall not be required to pay any amounts in excess of .this sum whether for copying costs, incidental, direct, or indirect costs, or any type incurred by Consultant. This section shall not limit the ability of the parties to amend this Agreement to provide for extra work. 2. Extra Work. Consultant shall receive compensation for extra work authorized by Agency in an amount as specified by the parties at the time such authorization is given. All extra work must be authorized in writing by the Project Administrator and Consultant shall not be entitled to extra compensation without such authorization. 3. Reimbursement for Expenses. Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by Agency. 4. Monthly Invoices. Consultant shall submit invoices to the Agency on a monthly basis in accordance with Consultant's schedule of fees contained in Exhibit "B" hereof. Each invoice will be itemized. Each invoice shall show the number of hours worked per person/consultant and the nature of the work performed. 5. Payment of Compensation. Agency shall make payments to Consultant within thirty (30) days of receiving said statement unless Agency disputes the amount Consultant claims is owned under this Agreement. 6. Withholdings. Agency may withhold payment of any disputed sums until satisfaction of the dispute with respect to "such payment. Such withholding shall not be deemed to constitute a failure to pay according to the terms of this Agreement. Consultant shall not discontinue its work for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of withholding as a result of such withholding. Consultant shall have an immediate right to appeal to the Chairman and the Agency with respect to such disputed sums. The determination of the Chairman and the Agency with respect to such matters shall be final. Consultant shall be entitled to receive interest on any withheld sums at the rate of seven percent (7%) per annum from the date of withholding of any amounts found to have been improperly withheld. 7. 10% Withholding. Agency may withhold an amount equivalent to ten percent (10%) of the total compensation provided herein, to be released to Consultant upon final adoption of the study by the Chairman and the Agency. The Agency reserves the right to refuse to pay all billings requesting amounts in excess of 90% of the total compensation provided herein until the project, is completed and adopted as specified above. SECTION V ACCOUNTING RECORDS Consultant shall keep records and invoices in connection with its work to be performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of Agency during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement. SECTION VI GENERAL PROVISIONS . Termination. A. Agency may, by written notice to Consultant, terminate the whole, or any part, of this Agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof, at least seven (7) days before the effective date of such termination. In the event of termination without cause, Consultant shall be compensated for the work performed up to the date of termination. Payment for work completed under the Agreement to date of termination shall be made strictly on the basis of the percent of work completed under the terms of this Agreement. The percent of work completed to date of termination shall be the percent of total Agreement sum which shall be paid to Consultant. The Project Manager shall determine the percent of work completed at the date of termination. In no event may total payment to termination exceed $162,000 Consultant shall be entitled to no further compensation n after termination. Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. B. In the event this Agreement is terminated, in whole or in part, as provided in. paragraph A ofthis section, Agency may procure from any person or entity upon such terms, and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated. C. If this Agreement is terminated as provided in paragraph A of this section, Consultant shall provide to Agency upon request by, Agency all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, drawings, maps, photographs, reports, etc., prepared by Consultant for the project. D. Consultant further covenants to give its good faith cooperation in the transfer of the work to any other consultant employed by the Agency following termination hereunder, and to participate in such meetings at no cost to Agency as shall be deemed necessary by the Project Manager to effectively accomplish its transfer. 2. Notices. Any notice required or desired to be given pursuant to this Agreement shall be given in writing, and sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: Agency Executive Director City of Fontana 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, Ca. 92335 (714) 350-7654 Consultant J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. Municipal Engineering Division 3426 Tenth Street Riverside, Ca. 92502 c/o Jon B. Sebba, P.E. Director, Water & Wastes Group (714) 683-0209 Any notice so given shall be considered served on the other party three (3) days after deposit in the U.S. mail, first class postage prepaid, and addressed to the party. at its applicable address. The address for notice may be changed by giving notice pursuant to this paragraph. 3. Litigation. Should litigation be necessary to enforce any term or provision of this Agreement, or to collect any portion of the amount payable under this Agreement, or to collect any portion of the amount payable under this Agreement, then all litigation and collection expenses, witness fees, expert fees, court costs, and attorney fees incurred by the prevailing party shall be paid to the prevailing party. 4. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement between Agency and Consultant with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings, or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by a writing signed by both parties. 5. Enforcement. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 6. Nondiscrimination by Consultant. Consultant represents and agrees that Consultant, its affiliates, subsidiaries, or holding companies do not and will not discriminate against any subcontractor, consultant, employee, or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, sex, handicap, or national origin. Such nondiscrimination shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, transfers, recruitment, recruitment advertising, layoff, termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection' for training,. including apprenticeship. 7. Agency's Rights to Employ Other Consultants. Agency reserves the right to employ other consultants in connection with this project. 8. Conflicts of Interest. A. The Consultant or its employees may be subject to the provisions of the California Political Reform Act of 1974 (the "Act"), which (1) requires such persons to disclose financial interest that may foreseeably be materially affected by the work performed under this Agreement, and (2) prohibits such persons form making, or participating in making, decisions that will foreseeably financially affect such interest. B. If subject to the Act, Consultant shall conform to all requirements of the Act. Failure to do so constitutes a material breach and is grounds for termination of this Agreement by the Agency. SECTION VII SUBCONTRACTING 1. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior approval of Agency. 2. Subcontracts, If any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have accepted and made and executed this agreement upon the terms, conditions, and provisions above stated, the day and year first above written. FONTANA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public body, corporate and politic REA l ND REC i,�'� NDED BY: tive Director ted: // /%// d Department Head ontraq't Compliance Offic CONSULTANT J.F. Davidson Associates, Inca By: Title: Dated: % Al2-11 U Insu .n e ompl APPROVED AS TO FORM AND.LEGAL CONTENT: Agency Attorney MP:sw EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHMENT TO CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT Engineering Services Highland Haven Infrastructure Project SCOPE OF SERVICES The following Scope of Services has been prepared as a result of meetings held with City staff on September 17, 1990. The following information outlines design specific tasks which will be coordinated with our Project Schedule and Fee Schedules section later in this proposal. In this way we have attempted to present to the City of Fontana a clear and concise sequence of tasks that J. F. Davidson Associates, inc., and its consultants will perform for this project. As stated in the cover letter, we have considered that a small part of the street design has been begun by the City of Fontana Public Works Department. Task 1. Design Surveys Based on our field review, we feel that a map prepared from a ground level survey will present the most accurate information for locating existing pavement, curbs and gutters, power poles, sidewalks, driveways, water valves, and other items critical to the development of the proposed sewer alignment. We will not incorporate contour lines on the aerial mapping. However, we intend to obtain elevations along the proposed sewer centerline at 50-foot stations with sections to the property lines. By doing this we can develop the centerline profile of the proposed sewer. All mapping will be done at 1"=40' horizontal scale. Vertical profiles shall be prepared at 1"=4' scale. We will field survey and provide a metes and bounds legal description of that rectangular portion of Parcels 228-31-08 and -09 required for the future extension of Walnut Street. Task 2. Utility Coordination We will research City records to obtain information on existing sewer, water, and storm drain facilities within or adjacent to the project area. This information will be plotted on the base mapping developed in Task 1 and transmitted to other utility agencies (gas, telephone, electric) so that they can indicate the location of their utilities. Once obtained, the latter will also be plotted on our plans. PROP:SWR.AF2 EXHIBIT AIPAGE 1 • • Through this process and in conjunction with Task 4, we will identify all utility conflicts with the proposed -sewer and determine the need for "potholing," if any, of any existing utilities. JFDA will arrange for potholing under a separate agreement to be negotiated at that time. Included in that work would be the survey in the horizontal and vertical locations of the utility. All other work for this Task will be done by the affected utility. Cost of such work shall not be borne by J. F. Davidson Associates, Inc. Task 3. Soils Investigation We will identify existing soils characteristics along the alignment of the proposed sewer line. Test holes will be drilled to depths of fifteen feet, about one per block. Soil conditions will be evaluated to include: 1. Visual classifications 2. Moisture contents 3. Field densities 4. Laboratory maximum density tests A written report shall be submitted and will include information on the following: 1. Recommendations for trenching both open and shored 2. Recommendations for pipe bedding 3. Special recommendations for expansive soils if encountered Task 4. Design and Cost Estimate 1. The street improvements to be designed under this proposal include complete plans for the new street construction of the proposed extension of Walnut Street, from Almeria to Catawba. Improvement plans will additionally be prepared for the removal and replacement of Catawba Avenue north between Torrey and Highland Avenues. Finally, rehabilitation plans will be prepared for Catawba south between Walnut and Los Cedros, Jacaranda Avenue between Los Cedros and Torrey, Torrey Avenue between Jacaranda and Catawba, and Los Cedros between Citrus and Almeria. These improvements are shown on the attached figure, and no other roadways will be improved at this time. 2. The sanitary sewers to be designed under this proposal includes pipelines in Almeria Avenue to the connection on Walnut Street, Catawba Avenue, Jacaranda Avenue, Tokay Avenue, Cherimoya Avenue, Torrey Avenue, and Los Cedros. These improvements are shown on the attached figure. PROP:SWR.AF2 ! EXHIBIT A, PAGE 2 • • 3. The storm drain facilities to be designed under this proposal includes those portions of the storm drainage improvements draining Jacaranda and Los Cedros Avenues will be designed along with the extension to the future storm drain at Walnut Street near Almeria Avenue. These improvements are shown on the attached figure. We will prepare final design plans, specifications, and construction cost estimates. Plans and specifications shall be done in conformance with the Fontana Public Improvement Policy and Procedure Manual, City standards, APWA, and "Green Book" Specifications. Engineering estimates will be prepared using prices prevailing in the field for the type of work proposed. All plans will be of a Leroyed format. Two sets of plans, specifications, and estimates will be submitted for checking purposes. Additional sets will be sent to all affected utilities for their review and clearance letters will be requested. Subsequent check sets will be submitted to the City as required. Task 5. Reproduction When the plans and specifications are approved by the City, we will print thirty- five sets of plans and specifications for bidding purposes. Copies beyond that number will be billed at cost plus 20%. Task 6. Bid Assistance JFDA will be available to answer technical questions during the bidding period. We will tabulate the bids, check references, bonds, and make a recommendation to Staff for award. The following tasks are not part of this acceptance of this proposal and may be authorized separately at the time of award of the construction contract. Task 7. Construction Management ( Phase II ) 1. This phase can be provided by in-house staff which will facilitate coordination between the designers and the construction inspectors. The JFDA construction management team consists of experienced professional engineers and field inspectors who are available to manage the construction. We have experience in managing multiple simultaneous contracts and the additional coordination required under those circumstances. PROP:SWR.AF2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 3 The following items specify the services which can be provided by J. F. Davidson Associates, Inc. a. Administer on a part-time basis, coordinate, inspect on a full-time basis, provide quality control, and assist in scheduling construction contracts with the intent of securing completion and fulfillment of the contracts in accordance with plans, specifications, and established schedules and budgets. b. Analyze and participate in negotiating all claims and contract changes requested or found desirable during the course of the construction work, and recommend to the City the action deemed appropriate. c. Provide and oversee field and laboratory testing, control of construction materials, and material handling and application. d. Keep daily diaries and furnish weekly reports on progress of construction, including construction progress photographs. e. Review and approve as to correctness, all billings for procurement or construction contract work and make recommendations to the City of Fontana. f. Approve detail construction revisions and initiate clarifications in consultation with the City. Maintain an up-to-date set of drawings, incorporating all additions, deletions, and revisions. h. Keep complete job site files including, but not limited to, correspondence, payment requests, change order documentation, shop drawing approvals, inspection reports, and correcting notices. Provide field and office surveying and stake -out work necessary for construction of the facilities. Assist in presentations to the City of Fontana for various reports, change orders, and other pertinent data as requested. k. Oversee construction scheduling and provide updates to the master schedule as necessary. Prepare monthly status reports to be distributed to the City. PROP:SWR.AF2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 4 Task 8 - As-Builts (Phase I I ) Based on field information from the construction monitoring and contractor reports, "as -built" drawings will be prepared locating facilities as actually installed. Compensation. Total contract amount shall not exceed $162,000 as per hourly rates noted in Exhibit "B". NOTE: See Exhibit."C" Improvement Design PROP:SWR.AF2 EXHIBIT A, PAGE 5 MIMMI MIMI MI aMI MI s MIMI MI IMMF J. F. Davidson Associates, Inc. EXHIBIT "B" SCHEDULE OF HOURLY BILLING RATES EFFECTIVE THROUGH JULY 31, 1991 (Revised 08/28/90) Engineering & Municipal Services Rate Surveying Services Rate Principal Engineer V Engineer IV Engineer III Engineer II Engineer I Engineering Designer IV Engineering Designer III Engineering Designer II Engineering Designer I. Drafting Supervisor II Drafting Supervisor. I Drafter IV Drafter III Drafter II Drafter I Transportation Engineer II' Transportation Planner Plan Checker $125.00 100.00 95.00 84.00 65.00 55.00 84.00 65.00 55.00 51.00 65.00 55.00 53.00 45.00 37.00 32.00 61.00 55.00 57.00 Principal $125.00 Land Surveyor IV 95.00 Land Surveyor III 82.00 Land Surveyor II 75.00 Land Surveyor I 65.00 Survey Drafter III 51.00 Survey Drafter II 45.00 Survey Drafter I 37.00 1-Man Survey Party 82.00 2-Man Survey Party, 140.00 3-Man Survey Party 180.00 Travel Time (when in excess of 8 hours work per day) 1-Man Survey Party 34.00 2-Man Survey Party 60.00 3-Man Survey Party 86.00 Inspector 63.00 * Above Rates are maximuM for.the classificaton. Planning Services Principal $125.00 Deputy Director, Planning ' 100.00 Planning Supervisor 84.00 Planner III 77.00 Planner II 71.00. Planner I 45.00 Planning Aide 32.00 Planning Intern 32.00 Landscape Architecture::'. Director, Landscape Architecture Cad Manager/Water.Management Project Landscape Architect Project Manager Project Coordinator.; Drafter II Drafter I Services And Expenses $90.00 67.00 67.00 60.00 48.00 37.00 32.00 Architecture Director:of Architecture Architect II Designer III Drafter III Drafter II Drafter' I Computer Services $84.00 67.00 65.00 44.00 34.00 30.00 Systems Technician $37.00 Operations Manager 65.00 Computer Operations Coor. 51.00 Computer Intern 32.00 Senior Computer Technician 37.00 Computer Technician 32.00 Secretarial/Word Processing Services $35.00 In-house Reproduction Cost Travel .36/Mile Subsistence Cost Other Expenses - including Special Consultants and Purchased Services through Subcontracts Coat +20% Expert Witness or Litigation (4-hour minimum, including preparation time) $160.00 A.". • O e b INV e r e m a m m of I- - » 0 j �_• e :I • e ..e 0 .» 0 •- oao m .• 0 w 0 •gym am 0 .a a_ •r O e 7 '• 0 .1. 4r) • .1 to U 10 0 ▪ 0 -I 1▪ 0 I •• 1.323D- . 0 I ' 19, 1• e e a a O 0 a ISO a u 11. 06 z• —a a •. 0, • e 'Q O or 0 vs _ • O or --I, e .. • m - ID Ir 0 MP •. eD 0 't -4M- O wMs 0 0 •• - • 0 e - -• 0 O - •- 0 O w er 0 44 w or 0 0 •o•PJw 0 am •o eD a no as. N • •. 1. 0 0 ••. ea 0 e - a 0 •• lee e re 0 U M. IV Ur I! m 0404 m •e 0 0w 0 O , O - +4 O • » e • - e w 0 to 0 111 m 1) 0 14 0 41 u II ID N a • -4 a • • koa 111 Ir .r• O 0 10 0 4, 4 I•. 4 M N e r•o 0 0 m 0 aor or U 0 aro -_ 0 a iv sr 0 -_O.-, 0 0 1 •-..0 o ea. 0 on NO 0 O — ---0 0 •o I •. 0 0 •• w 0 e ••Cj •• 0 O sftz az •4 -• a aft e 0 • rw. 0 O 044 VP • '4% 111 14 • r 4411 • 1414 41 0 0 H. '• l•1 I w 0 t 0 IiI O ,- 01 0 re or 0 0 '- .. SD 0 or 1/ • 41 too ._0. 0 roe 0__ -• •w m . .• 0 Ie. __ O .11 -•._�' _. !0 s w 0 . O .-1 1• 0 e 144, 0 Or 0 .r 'F• y •.e 0 .r 4 er .00to noo 4 •• 4.1 •. Ia •• 0 P. 'I) •r• wn • 0•• .w 0 4e O - !4 •• 4 •• N H• e •r a •• N •r . .. f_ .1, "4 w If •• --• O .» IS I • O D. 0 • n • e _N ,.... 0 •• 0 0 a 4.) 4 OW • 0 • 0_ • • Y r �. 0 - 41, • 0 , •_0__ er 0 • m • ID .•-.- • 0 • b ; D.� :I m m 0 b • ID O 0 'II U 0 PO U 0 1.1 U Is U .9 PP 'f Iy 4H 44 b 4Y V _• - m •• O .e O �PROPERTY TO BE ACQUIRED — CITY OF FONTANA HOUSING REHABILITATION AND • INFRASTRUCTURE ANALYSIS PROPOSED SEWERS EXHIBIT No. I — FUTURE 21• SEWER INTERCEPTOR LINE FUTURE B" V.C.P. SEWER LINE FUTURE 4 FT. DIA. MANHOLE FUTURE 4 FT. DIA. MANHOLE FOR INTERCEPTOR COMPLETE PAVEMENT REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT.CONSTRUCT CURB AND GUTTER. SIDEWALKS AND DRIVE APPROACHES, WHERE NEEDED. REHABILITATION OF EXISTING PAVEMENT IOVERLAY CONSTRUCT CURB AND GUTTER. SIDEWALKS AND DRIVE APPROACHES, WHERE NEEDED. SECONDARY STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN COMPLETE NEW STREET, CONSTRUCT CURB, GUTTER, AND SIDEWALKS. 4 i Exhibit "C" t. CITY OF FONTANA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Prepared by Initials Date Approved by PHONE LIST AND ACTION LOG W/P Ref Date Person ci;tir Comments JuLt&I Type o cJ Notes (Name Title & Phone Number): P-Phone Contact, W-Written Contact, M-Meeting Revised 08/14/89 (JIM) • AGENDA ITEM 6 A TO: FROM: INITIATED BY: PREPARED BY: SUBJECT: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION REPORT SEPTEMBER 3. 1991 NEW BUSINESS Meeting Date Agenda Placement Chairman and Agency Members Greg Hulsizer, Commune olAgriedinbtor Don Gee, Redevelopment and Housing Manager Maggie Pacheco, Redevelopment Project Coordinator ,AA Approval of the Financing Plan and Implementation Schedule Highland Haven in North Fontana Redevelopment Project Area CURRENT ACTION REQUESTED: MOTION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. FRA 91- , APPROVING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FINANCING PLAN AND IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE FOR THE HIGHLAND HAVEN TARGET AREA WITHIN THE NORTH FONTANA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (HOUSING AND INFRASTRUCTURE REVITALIZATION PROGRAM); AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO TAKE ALL APPROPRIATE ACTIONS IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT THE PLAN. Funding BUDGET IMPACT: I_I No IXXI Yes Source: General - v" 1 Fund Budget IXXI 28-2175 Fund Budget 1_1 Bond Proceeds 1-1 Developer Deposits This plan involves Redevelopment Agency expenditures of up to $3 million from its North Fontana 20% Set Aside Funds. Phase I Improvements are estimated to cost up to $1.9 million and Phase II improvements are estimated to cost up to $1 million. These are only estimates since the improvements have not been placed out to bid. Once the bids are received, precise cost can be determined. Additionally, the Agency may receive reimbursements from outside benefitting development and from property owners who do not qualify for the Program. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: I I Yes .IXI No On June 5, 1990, the Redevelopment Agency adopted a Negative Declaration approving the "Housing and Infrastructure Revitalization Program." This program outlined the provision of various public improvements such as sewer, storm drains, streets, curbs, gutters etc., and rehabilitation and development of housing. • • JUSTIFICATION: In July 1989, the Agency approved in concept a Redevelopment Housing Assistance/Enhancement Program within Redevelopment Project Areas and specifically authorized staff to initiate a Pilot Housing Program in the North Fontana Project Area. As a result, in September 1989, the Agency; authorized Staff to retain the services of J. F. Davidson Associates, Inc. to ascertain the housing conditions and infrastructure constraints and deficiencies within the neighborhood of "Highland Haven" in North Fontana. On June 5, 1990, the Agency approved a "Housing and Infrastructure Revitalization Program" for the Highland Haven area. The prime purpose of this Program is to revitalize and enhance a residential neighborhood suffering from physical, social and economic deficiencies and to further fulfill the requirements of the redevelopment law, wherein the Agency must utilize its 20% set aside funds to expand housing opportunities for low/moderate persons. Moreover, it is important to recall that this area was selected primarily because of its depressed and blighted conditions and lack of essential public improvements. The Program is intended to serve as a catalyst Pilot Program. Upon commencement and successful completion of this Program, it is intended to utilize and expand this Program for other areas such as the Downtown where there is also a great need to improve housing and infrastructure conditions. In June, when the overall Program was approved by the Agency, the Agency directed staff to prepare a comprehensive Financing Plan and Implementation Schedule to be brought back to the Agency for their consideration. Attached for your review is the proposed Public Improvements Financing Plan and Implementation Schedule. In summary the Plan describes the following: • The Agency will advance and provide the funds necessary to implement the Programs from its North Fontana 20% Set Aside Funds of up to $3 million. - The Program involves construction of public improvements in two (2) Phases. Phase I consists of construction of sewer lines inclusive of acquisition of necessary easements (this item is on tonight's City Council Agenda if the Agency does not approve this Plan that item will be unnecessary), street repairs, and storm drains at the estimated cost of $1.9 million. Phase II - consists of construction of street improvements such as sidewalks, curbs, gutters at the estimated cost of $1 million. ▪ Phase I is scheduled to commence April 1992. Currently, the Agency overall Plan. Therefore, Phase II available, and the drainage issues Highland Haven. in November 1991 and be completed by has available up to $2 million for the will not commence until resources are are resolved to the immediate south of The cost of the improvements will be spread over all of the benefitting parcels to arrive at per parcel pro-rata shares (estimated at $6,524 per parcel). This amount is subject to change depending on actual construction bids. The cost per parcel will be adjusted accordingly. • • Those benefitting property owners who meet the criteria outlined in the Plan, can apply to the Agency for waiver of their pro-rata share. Those benefitting property owners who do not meet the outlined criteria, such as owners of vacant property, will not be eligible to have their prorata share waived and therefore upon development must pay their share of the improvement costs. The City Council will need to amend its sewer and storm drain Ordinances to increase the respective fee for this area only to include the pro-rata share. - Those eligible property owners meeting the income criteria under the CDBG Program (80% of median income) will be eligible to obtain a sewer connection right ($1500). The CDBG Program recently purchased 150 sewer connection rights at $1500 per connection. These rights were purchased exclusively for Highland Haven residents who meet the income criteria. This summarizes the major key points of the Plan. Please refer to the attached Plan for further specifics. The Highland Haven Committee has reviewed the Plan, and generally is in agreement with the Plan. Accordingly, staff recommends approval of the Public Improvements Financing Plan and Implementation Schedule. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. FRA 91- 2. Financing Plan & Implementation Schedule 3. Map of Area REVIEWED BY: Jennif; Vaughn- lake Assis ant City Manage DG:MP:lp rda mp.1 REVIEWED BY: Steve Deitsch or Clark Alsop Agency Attorney RECOMMENDED BY: Russel l . Carl sen Executive Director • Housing and Infrastructure Revitalization Program Highland Haven Target Area Proposed Publics Improvements Financing Plan and Implementation Schedule 8/16/91 The following information summarizes the proposed plan and schedule for funding and installing the sewer, storm drain and street improvements in Highland Haven. I. PROQRAN DESCRIPTION o The installation: of the public, improvements will occur in two phases. Phase I, involving the installation of sewers and a "dry" storm drainsystem Is estimated to begin by November 1, 1991 and should be completed by March of 1992. Phase II, involving the installation of curb, gutter and sidewalk, will not be initiated until the first phase improvements are completed, there are sufficient' funds available and certain drainage issues existing to the south of the neighborhood have been resolved. o The Redevelopment Agency will finance the installationof the Phase I public improvements with 20% tax increment set -aside housing funds, which, pursuant to State Law, are restricted in use to increasing and/or improving the City's supply of low and moderate income housing. If it is determined to proceed with Phase II, these improvements may also be funded with 20% set -aside funds. o In all likelihoodnot all of the owners of property which will benefit from the public improvements are of low or moderate income. Therefore, in order to assure that to the extent possible property owners who are not low/moderate income pay their fair share of the cost of the improvements, the Agency proposes: - to spread the cost of the improvements over all of the benefitting properties within the target area to arrive at per parcel pro-rata shares of such costs. - to request the City to amend its Sewer Ordinance establishing a separate sewer connection fee for Highland Haven consisting of the current sewer connection right fee plus the per parcel pro-rata share of the total cost of the sewer improvements payable by, each owner. ATTACHMENT # 2 • • - to develop an' application process to be used in concert with the City's sewer connection permitting process, to identify and confirm low and moderate income homeowners. - to waive the per parcel pro-rata share sewer fee for any low or moderate income homeowner (owner occupant or investor owner) desiring to hook up to the sewer and willing to execute and have recorded, a deed restriction on their property, restricting the use of such property to low/moderate income households. - to require that those homeowners not meeting the• low/ moderate income criteria and owners of vacant parcels pay their connection right fee and their pro-rata share sewer fee in order to hook up to the sewer. - to request the City to amend. the appropriate Ordinance(s) in order to levy a fee for the pro- rata share of the street and storm drain improvements as a condition of building permit issuance for any new development in Highland Haven. - to' establish' a method by which the City will turn over all pro-rata share fees collected within area to the Agency for deposit in the North Fontana Low/Moderate Income Housing Fund. II. PROGRAM CRITERIA o For purposes of this project the following, definitions shall apply: - Area Median Income - The median income for San Bernardino County as published from time to time by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. - Very Low Income Households - Persons or families whose income, adjusted for family size, is not more than 50% of the area median income. - Low Income Households - Persons or families whose income, adjusted for family size, is above 50% but does not exceed 80% of the area median income. Moderate Income Households - Persons or families whose income, adjusted for family size, is above, 80% but does not exceed 120% of area median income. • • o.Based on the median income for this area ($36,000) as determined by the Department of Housing and Urban Development for 1991, the current low/moderate income limits for this project are as follows: STANDARD Very Low Income Low Income Moderate Income NUMBER OF PERSONS IN FAMILY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 s~ 12,600 14,400 16,200 18,000 t, 19,450,, 20,900 22,300 23,750 20,150 Y 23,0501, 25,900 28,800_.. 31,100 33,400' • 35,700'. 38,800 ' 30,250 34,550 " 38,900 43,20`b 46,656, 50,100 53,550 57,000 o Subsequent to completion of the Phase I improvements (on or about April 1, 1992) property owners will be able to apply to the City to connect to the sewer. Owners of vacant land will be charged the connection right fee and the pro-rata share fee prior to receiving a permit to connect. Homeowners will be referred to the Redevelopment Agency - Housing Division in order to determine eligibility for financial assistance. o Homeowners who do not meet the low/moderate income eligibility standards will be referred back to the City to pay the required connection right fee and pro-rata share fee prior to receiving a permit to connect. o Owner occupants, whose household income is 80% or less of the median income and who meet all other qualification requirements, will be eligible for: - CDBG funded sewer connection right. - waiver of their pro-rata share sewer fee. CDBG low interest loan or grant assistance in funding the cost of connecting to the sewer and pumping and filling the cesspool/septic tank. o Homeowners (absentee or owner occupant) whose household income is greater than 80% of median income but less than 120% of median income and who meet all other qualification requirements, will be eligible for: waiver of their pro-rata share sewer fee. - 20% set -aside funded low interest loan assistance in financing the cost of connecting to the sewer and pumping and filling the cesspool/septic tank. (May also be used to finance the cost of the sewer connection right.) o Subsequent to completion of the storm drain and street improvements, owners of vacant land who desire to develop their property, will be charged their pro-rata share of these improvement costs as part of their building permit requirements. III. IMPLANTATION SCHEDULE Phase I June 5, 1990 Agency approves Housing and Infrastructure Revitalization Program for Highland Haven, adopts a Negative Declaration for the Program and authorizes staff to prepare a financing plan and implementation schedule. July 31, 1991 Completed sewer and storm drain plans and _specifications. -in final plan check. J.F. DavidsonAssociates, Inc. submits cost estimates and the preliminary per parcel pro- rata•shares of the improvement costs to the • City. Aug. 1, 1991 North Fontana Highland Haven Target Area Committee 'reviewws• and approves proposed Financing Plan and Implementation Schedule. Sept. 3, 1991City Council and Redevelopment Agency approve the proposed Financing Plan and Implementation Schedule. Sept. 17, 1991 City Council and Redevelopment Agency approve the acquisition. of right of way necessary to accommodate the ultimate linkage of the Highland Haven sewer system with the proposed sewer line to the south. Sept. 17, 1991 City Council approves sewer and storm drain plans and' specifications and authorizes bidding of both. Oct. 15, 1991 City conducts -sewer and storm drain bid opening and awards contract(s). Oct. 16, 1991 Agency deposits an appropriate amount of funds from the North Fontana 20% Set -aside Fund into a sewer/storm drain construction account. Oct. 22, 1991 J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. calculates and submits final per parcel pro-rata shares of sewer and storm drain costs. Nov. 1, 1991 Contractor(s)'Starts installation of sewer and storm drain improvements. Nov. 5, 1991 City Council amends Sewer Ordinance establish- ing a sewer connection fee for Highland Haven consisting of the current City connection right fee plus the per parcel pro-rata share of the cost of the overall sewer project. Nov. 19, 1991 City Council amends Ordinance levying a fee for the pro-rata share of the storm drain improvements as a condition of building permit issuance for any new development in Highland Haven. March 31, 1992-Contractor completes sewer and storm drain improvements. April 1, 1192 City/Agency prepare to receive applications from Highland Haven homeowners for financial aid to assist in the purchase of sewer connection rights, the payment of per parcel pro-rata share sewer fees and the payment of theactual: costs to connect to the sewer. Agency continues to concentrate housing rehabilitation efforts in neighborhood. Aug. Phase II 31, 1991 J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. submits completed street plans and specifications to City with cost estimates and preliminary per parcel pro-rata shares of improvement costs. .4 . June 2, 1992 City Council approves plans and specifications and authorizes bidding of street improvements. July 21, 1992 City:. conducts bidopening and awards street improvement contract. July 22, 1992 Agency deposits an appropriate amount of funds from North Fontana 20% Set --aside Fund into a Citystreet construction account. July 28, 1992 J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. prepares and submits final report of proposed per parcel pro-rata shares of the street improvement costs. • Aug. 4, 1992 City Council amends Ordinance levying a fee for the pro-rata share of the street • • improvements as a condition of building permit issuance for any new development in Highland Haven. Aug. 21, 1992 Contractor begins installation of street improvements. Dec. 31, 1992 Contractor completes installation of street improvements. ITT. ESTIMATED PROGRAM COSTS (assumes construction will commence in late 1991) Phase I Sewer Storm Drain Phase II $1,299,582 $ 746,359 Street Improve- ments $1,284,315 V. ESTIMATED PER PARCEL PRO RATA SHARES Phase I Sewer Storm Drain Phase IY Street Improve- ments HH IMPW.SCH gvo <forda> 08.20.91 3,922 2,034 • Storm Drain Phase II Street Improve- ments HH_IMPW.SCH 08.01.91 per parcel pro rata share fee (361 benefiting lots) 1,900 (393 benefiting lots) 3,268 (393 benefiting lots) C• • C HIGHLAND t • • NORTH FONTANA HOUSING STUDY HIGHLAND HAVEN TARGET AREA (Carlo. AY.nu.] - Av..y. -_ I Curtis a C • < Carla Av.nll. C • 4 Aroma. W.In.L$L 0 a Curll. A • • 4 • • • Q Y • O U • 4 AY• a i 4 0 • 0 0 _AVENUE O E • U STUDY AREA STATE HW 1 f.rr,.o 81 • • 4 Walnut • 3 C 4 • cr cr W 5 Ifr•.1 NOI TO SCAM EXHIBIT '). HIGHLAND HAVEN INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM AGENDA July 8, 1991 - 9:00 a.m. DAB Conference Room 1. Status of Sewer and Street Improvement Plan Check. 2. Status of Presley Sewer Plans - Baseline Trunk Line - Almeria Line 3. Status of Presley Storm Drain Plans - Hydrology Plans 4. Review of items on J.F. Davidson Progress Statement 5. City Sewer Connection Fee vs. Construction Costs - i.e., reimbursements? - What about Chino Basin Fees? City of Fontana CALIFORNIA April 30, 1991 Mr. Ralph Chenier Project Manager Presley of Southern California 19 Corporate Plaza Newport Beach, CA 92660 RE: Meeting of April 26, 1991-Presley Project/North Fontana Dear Ralph: The purpose of this memo is to reiterate our discussions and understanding of our April 26th meeting regarding your Project. A summary is as follows: Sewer o The City will construct the Baseline Sewer Trunk Line. Funds for the sewer will come from the City's Sewer Fund. Assuming all plans are complete and approved, the tentative construction schedule is as noted on the attached Agenda. o Presley will provide to the City all necessary completed plans and specifications for the Baseline and Almeria Sewer Line. Presley will also submit to the City a Cost Summary for Sewer Design Work with all support documentation. The Summary should list Presley costs incurred with the designing and preparation of the sewer plans and specifications. The City's Public Works Department will review and correspond with Presley regarding the level of reimbursement due to Presley for the design work. 8353 SIERRA AVENUE (P.O. BOX 518) • FONTANA. CALIFORNIA Q2334-0518 • (714) 350-7600 SISTER CITY — KAMLOOPS, B.C. CANADA Mr. Ralph Chenier April 30, 1991 Page 2 o Any sewer easement costs along Walnut Avenue required for the Highland Haven Tract will be administered and incurred by City/Agency. Street Improvements o Street easements required to connect Almeria and Walnut Avenues (to allow the connection to Highland Ave.) will be appraised by Redevelopment Agency Consultant, and will be subject to discussion and negotiations between Presley and City/Agency upon completion of the appraisal (i.e. within the next 30 days). Drainage b Ray Wellington expressed concerns about the regional drainage facilities required prior to commencement of the Presley Project. Public Works staff will review the Presley storm drain plans and specifications to assure plans meet the City's overall drainage criteria. Public Works will correspond with Presley regarding the solutions acceptable to the City. Again, I think you will agree that having the City take the lead on the sewer construction will be most beneficial to the Presley Project as well as the revitalization efforts of the Highland Haven area. Toward that end, I ask for our mutual cooperation, and I look forward to moving ahead. Thank you for all your patience and assistance. Should you have any questions, please call me at (714) 350-6739. Sincerely, CO u ITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Magg a e4,1tel co Redeye opment Project Coordinator MP:cm cc: R. Garcia D. Gee R. Wellington G. Bucknell F. Molinos H. Strozier APRIL 26, 1991 PRESLEY PROJECT NORTH FONTANA AGENDA 1. Baseline sewer Trunk Line = Maggie Pacheco o Sewer and Street (ROW) easement acquisition. o City Construction Schedule • Bidding/City Approval: June 1, 1991 ▪ Construction Start Date: September 1, 1991 ▪ Construction Completion Date: February 1, 1992 o Sewer Rights vs. Developer Reimbursements 2. Drainage - Ray Wellington o Drainage Plans/Temporary vs. Permanent Facilities 3. Other Business • City of Fontana CALIFORNIA May 3, 1991 Ms. Lorita Lloyd 15864 Torrey Dr. Fontana, CA 92335. RE: Highland Haven Target Area - North Fontana Dear Ms. Lloyd: On behalf of the Fontana Redevelopment Agency, I would like to thank you for participating in the Highland Haven Committee meeting of April 18th. At this meeting, we discussed the items noted on the attached Agenda and specifically walked through the schedule and financing for the planned infrastructure improvements (see back-up information). A summary and consensus of the issues discussed are as follows: o The City will proceed with the construction of the Baseline/Almeria Sewer Trunk Line as outlined in the tentative schedule of Alternative II. The sewer construction costs will be paid for with City Sewer Funds. o Alternative I This alternative dealt with the infrastructure being installed through the establishment of an Assessment District (or another public financing method), thus allowing funds to be available in one lump sum for the installation of needed improvements in one phase. As an example, this scenario was illustrated on the attached Alternative I. The group present essentially agreed that the property owners should not have to pay for the needed public improvements because 1) the majority of the residents could not afford to pay the potential annual 8353 SIERRA AVENUE (P.O. BOX 518) • FONTANA CALIFORNIA 92334-0618 • (714) 350-7600 SISTER CITY— KAMLOOPS, B.C. CANADA • • assessments, and 2) the City promised the community installation of the public improvements since 1982. o Alternative II This alternative dealt with the public improvements being installed in two phases due to the shortage of funds. As an example, this scenario was illustrated on the attached Alternative II. Staff suggested that the sewer and storm lines could be constructed first at an approximate cost of $1.8 million. Redevelopment Agency funds would be utilized to construct the sewer lines and storm drains within the Highland Haven Tract. The balance of the street improvements could be constructed as Phase II, thus giving staff and the Committee the opportunity to explore all other possible funding mechanisms. The group concurred with the approach, and voted to move forward with the sewer and storm drain construction as Phase I, and continue to work on funding sources for Phase II street improvements. Toward that end, staff will proceed to obtain plan approval for sewer and storm drains in an effort to begin construction in October 1991 with a estimated completion date of February 1992. It was agreed that another meeting would be scheduled within the next 45 days to discuss financing for the balance of the street improvements. Again, thank you for all you assistance. Should you need to reach me, please call me at (714) 350-6739. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Maggie, acheco Redevelopment. Project Coordinator MP:cm Attachments cc: Dorothy Grant Don Gee Musibau Arogundade File • • NORTH FONTANA HIGHLAND HAVEN TARGET AREA APRIL 18, 1991 6:30 P.M. AGENDA 1. Introductions 2. Infrastructure Program Update * Baseline Sewer Trunk Line Construction Schedule * Highland Haven Infrastructure Construction Schedule * Funding Mechanisms (See Alternatives I & II) 3. CDBG Funding Update * Public Hearing: 5/7/91 * Sewers 4. Meeting Dates 5. Announcements 6. Other Business 7. Adjournment INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM ESTIMATED COSTS HIGHLAND HAVEN PROJECT - SOUTH SUBAREA Alternative II: I. Construction Costs * Street Improvements $1,165,594 * Storm Drain Improvements 374,144 * Sewer Improvements 1,318,884 * Contingency 10% 285.862 Sub -Total Costs $3,144,484 Non -Construction Costs * Engineering & Surveys, etc. $500,000 * City of Fontana Fees 130,000 * Sewer and Street Easement Acquisition Costs 30.000 Sub -Total Costs $660,000 Other Potential Costs * Reimburseable to Presley - Upsizing of Facilities $100,000 * 15% Contingency 114.000 Sub -Total of Costs $214,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS $4,018,484 Less RDA 20% Set -Aside Contribution 1.500.000 FUND SHORTAGE: $2,518,484 II. Alternative Solution to Fund Shortfall: Develop the Project in Two Phases * Install sewer line first; or * Look for alternative funding; "property owners pitch in". III. Infrastructure Schedule A. Baseline Sewer Trunk Line * City Approval June, 1991 * Construction Start September, 1991 * Construction Completion January, 1992 B. Highland Haven Sewer Line * City Approval July, 1991 * Construction Start October, 1991 * Construction Completion February, 1992 4/18/91:mp *11.*AlanSWIfvfluEcT COSTS PROPOSED CITY OF FONTANA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT HIGHLAND HAVEN PROJECT - SOUTH SUBAREA L CG GF:_CF.C�taFRi�F<iC [IV���.�� -own-t CCSC.iSC=G_C.mAr..iGC=f CC==CCP=iFECG iC�ti��G.CC000=GL's COGFG Totals Street lrprvnnt's Stara Drains SewerE. CONSTRUCTION COSTS • ,cF s4a Street Improvements''' .O 14 Street Lights 4 Sto-a Drain Improvements 1,310,884 3741 Sewer Improvements 2,656,622 285,862 Gob Total Contingency 44 Total Construction Costs 3.1, - M_---M_-N-_- 1,165.594 374,144 1,=18.884 NON -CONSTRUCTION COSTS Engineering lr Surveys City of Fontana Bond Issuance Costs Other Non -Construction Costs Total Non -Construction Costs 10.00% , li5 Koa 116,559 1,282.153 374,144 37.414 411,558 1.318.1384 131,888 1,450,772 503,117 205,145 65.849 232,124 53 007 17,015 59,978 140.000 57,085 18,324 64.592 40,000 16,310 10,0005,235 18,455 813.117 331,546 106.423 375,148 CONTRIBUTIONS l.200,000 0 RDA 0 0 Other 225,405 794,569 Total Contributions 1,200,000 702.219 2.757.602 911,481 292,576 1,031,352 Total Project Casts 'FINANCING CORMS Total Prelim! Costs Bond Reserve Capital$Zed Interest Underwriters Discount Proposed Bond Amount 2,757,602 351,287 351,287 52,693 911,481 292,576 1.031,352 116.112 37,271 131.382 116,112 37,271 131,382 17.417 5,591 ' 19,707 3,512.868 1.161.122 372,709 1,313.824 ESTIMATED ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX REQUIREMENT Bond Service Aeaunt Fiscal Agent Agency Administration Total 343.248 15,000 25,000 $383,248 113,455 36,418 128.176 15,000 15.000 15,000 25,000 25,000 25.000 $153,455 076.418 $168.376 ASSESSMENTS Residential Lot Total Annual Assessment $7,017 $2,319 $744 `2.624 624 $975 $390 $194 I, .11 .• I II .I. JFD 8911629-01 le-AF'R- 1991 City Of Fontana 8911629-01 PURPOSE: DATE: LOCATION: MEETING AGENDA Final Design Questions July 8, 1991 City Of Fontana James A. Oravets ATTENDANCE: Mr. Ray Wellington - Interim City Engineer —A" Ms. Maggie Pacheco - Redevelopment/client Mr.Felipe Molinos - Public Works Mr. Edgar Casasola - Plan Checking.— N) Mr. Jon B. Sebba - JFDA Mr. Jim Oravets - JFDA ITEM 1 - HYDROLOGY - Plan Checker with Favreau questions status of the Madole study. - JFDA plans utilized this study at the City's request. ITEM 2 - RELOCATIONS - Present listing of relocations in table form. - Discuss method of involving property owners. - Review preliminary cost estimate for relocations. - JFDA suggests a separate plan for the relocations. - This will require an extra, JFDA to minimize cost. ITEM 3 - POTHOLES Present the pothole location map. Review estimated cost for potholes. Discuss at what point in the project to do this. JFDA recommends potholing prior to approval of plans. ITEM 4 - GENERAL I 'S r D t 'e Present sketch of property frontage on Knuckle lots, driveways will be tight. City decision ? Present listing of lots requiring on -site grading, or modified section. Plan checker wants further recommendation from soils engineer regarding pavement evaluation. City decision. Interim street plans will be prepared (extra required) at or near completion of phase II plans. FONTANA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY HIGHLAND HAVEN TR 3348 PRIVATE PROPERTY RELOCATIONS LOT NO. STREET FENCE SHRUB DRIVEWAY TREES MAILBOX TOTAL COST S360 EA S50 LS $300 EA S150 EA S50 LS LOTS 1 THROUGH 59 FRONT ON CITRUS OR HIGHLAND AND HAVE NO PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS 60 LOS CEDROS 1 $50.00 61 LOS CEDROS 1 1 1 S460.00 62 LOS CEDROS 1 1 S410.00 63 LOS CEDROS 1 1 S410.00 64 LOS CEDROS 1 $50.00 65 LOS CEDROS 1 $50.00 66 LOS CEDROS 1 S50.00 67 LOS CEDROS 1 1 S410.00 68 LOS CEDROS 1 1 S410.00 69 LOS CEDROS 1 1 1 S460.00 70 LOS CEDROS 1 1 S410.00 71 LOS CEDROS 1 1 1 S460.00 72 LOS CEDROS 1 S50.00 73 LOS CEDROS 1 S50.00 74 LOS CEDROS 1 $50.00 75 LOS CEDROS 1 S50.00 76 LOS CEDROS 1 S50.00 77 LOS CEDROS 1 S50.00 78 LOS CEDROS 1 1 1 S200.00 79 LOS CEDROS 1 S50.00 80 LOS CEDROS 1 $50.00 81 LOS CEDROS 1 1 1 S560.00 82 LOS CEDROS 1 1 S410.00 83 LOS CEDROS 1 1 1 S560.00 84 CATAWABA 1 1 S350.00 85 CATAWABA 1 1 S350.00 86 CATAWABA 1 1 S350.00 87 CATAWABA 1 $50.00 88 CATAWABA 1 1 S350.00 89 CATAWABA 1 1 S350.00 90 CATAWABA 1 1 S350.00 91 CATAWABA 1 1 1 1 S550.00 92 CATAWABA 1 $50.00 93 CATAWABA 1 $50.00 94 CATAWABA 1 1 1 1 S860.00 95 CATAWABA 1 S50.00 96 CATAWABA 1 $50.00 97 CATAWABA 1 1 S350.00 98 CATAWABA 1 1 1 S500.00 99 CATAWABA 1 1 1 S400.00 100 LOS CEDROS 2 1 1 $1,070.00 SUBTOTAL S11,840.00 LOT NO. STREET FENCE SHRUB DRIVEWAY TREES MAILBOX TOTAL COST S360 EA S50 LS S300 EA S150 EA S50 LS 101 LOS CEDROS 1 1 1 S460.00 102 LOS CEDROS 1 1 1 S460.00 103 LOS CEDROS 1 1 1 S460.00 104 LOS CEDROS 1 1 2 1 1 S1,210.00 105 ALMERIA 1 1 S200.00 106 ALMERIA 1 1 S200.00 107 ALMERIA 1 1 S350.00 108 ALMERIA 1 1 S350.00 109 ALMERIA 1 1 S350.00 110 ALMERIA 1 1 S350.00 111 ALMERIA 1 1 S350.00 112 ALMERIA 1 $50.00 113 ALMERIA 1 1 1 S400.00 114 ALMERIA 1 1 S350.00 115 ALMERIA 1 1 S350.00 116 ALMERIA 1 1 1 S500.00 117 ALMERIA 1 1 S350.00 118 ALMERIA 1 1 1 1 S550.00 119 NO LOT S0.00 120 ALMERIA 1 S50.00 121 ALMERIA 1 1 1 S400.00 122 ALMERIA 1 1 S410.00 123 ALMERIA 1 1 1 S710.00 124 ALMERIA 1 1 1 1 S550.00 125 ALMERIA 1 1 1 S400.00 126 ALMERIA 1 1 1 S500.00 127 ALMERIA 1 S50.00 128 ALMERIA 1 1 1 1 S860.00 129 ALMERIA 1 1 S350.00 130 ALMERIA 1 S50.00 131 ALMERIA 1 S50.00 132 ALMERIA 1 S50.00 133 ALMERIA 1 1 S350.00 134 ALMERIA 1 1 S350.00 135 ALMERIA 1 1 S350.00 136 ALMERIA 1 S50.00 137 ALMERIA 1 S50.00 138. ALMERIA 1 S50.00 139 ALMERIA 1 S50.00 140 ALMERIA 1 S50.00 141 ALMERIA 1 1 S100.00 142 ALMERIA 1 $50.00 143 ALMERIA 1 1 1 S500.00 144 ALMERIA 1 1 1 1 S550.00 145 ALMERIA 1 1 1 1 S550.00 146 ALMERIA 1 S50.00 147 ALMERIA 1 1 S350.00 148 ALMERIA 1 S50.00 149 ALMERIA 1 S50.00 150 TORREY 1 1 S410.00 SUBTOTAL S15,680.00 LOT NO. STREET FENCE SHRUB DRIVEWAY TREES MAILBOX TOTAL COST S360 EA S50 LS S300 EA S150 EA S50 LS 151 TORREY 152 TORREY 153 TORREY 154 TORREY 155 TORREY 1 156 TORREY 157 TORREY 158 TORREY 159 TORREY 160 TORREY 161 TORREY 1 162 TORREY 163 TORREY 164 TORREY 165 TORREY 1 166 TORREY 1 167 TORREY 1 1 168 TORREY 1 1 169 TORREY 1 170 TORREY 1 171 TORREY 1 172 TORREY 173 TORREY 1 1 174 TORREY 1 1 175 TORREY 1 176 TORREY 1 177 CHERIMOYA 1 1 178 CHERIMOYA 1 1 179 CHERIMOYA 180 CHERIMOYA 181 CHERIMOYA 182 CHERIMOYA 183 CHERIMOYA 184 CHERIMOYA 185 CHERIMOYA 186 CHERIMOYA 187 CHERIMOYA 1 188 CHERIMOYA 1 189 CHERIMOYA 190 CHERIMOYA 1 1 191 CHERIMOYA 1 192 CHERIMOYA 1 193 CHERIMOYA 194 CHERIMOYA 195 CHERIMOYA 1 196 CHERIMOYA 1 197 CHERIMOYA 198 CHERIMOYA 199 CHERIMOYA 1 200 CHERIMOYA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S200.00' 1 $50.00 1 S50.00 1 $50.00 1 S100.00 1 S50.00 1 S350.00 1 $50.00 1 S50.00 1 S200.00 1 S410.00 1 S50.00 1 $50.00 1 S50.00 1 S410.00 1 S410.00 1 S460.00 1 S460.00 1 S410.00 1 S710.00 1 S560.00 1 S50.00 1 S460.00 1 S760.00 1 S250.00 1 S100.00 1 S460.00 1 S460.00 1 S50.00 1 S50.00 1 S50.00 1 S50.00 1 S50.00 1 S50.00 1 $50.00 1 S200.00 1 S100.00 1 S100.00 1 S50.00 1 $460.00 1 S410.00 1 S410.00 1 S350.00 1 $50.00 1 S400.00 1 $400.00 1 $50.00 1 $50.00 1 S100.00 1 S50.00 SUBTOTAL S11,200.00 LOT NO. STREET FENCE SHRUB DRIVEWAY TREES MAILBOX TOTAL COST $360 EA S50 LS $300 EA $150 EA $50 LS 201 CHERIMOYA 1 1 S100.00 202 CHERIMOYA 1 1 S100.00 203 CHERIMOYA 1 1 1 1 S610.00 204 CHERIMOYA 1 S50.00 205 CHERIMOYA 1 1 1 $400.00 206 CHERIMOYA 1 1 S410.00 207 CHERIMOYA 1 1 1 S400.00 208 CHERIMOYA 1 S50.00 209 CHERIMOYA 1 1 1 S710.00 210 CHERIMOYA 1 1 1 S460.00 211 CHERIMOYA 1 1 S100.00 212 CHERIMOYA 1 S50.00 213 CHERIMOYA 1 1 S410.00 214 CHERIMOYA 1 1 1 S460.00 215 CHERIMOYA 1 1 1 $460.00 216 CHERIMOYA 1 1 1 1 S610.00 217 CHERIMOYA 1 1 1 S460.00 218 CHERIMOYA 1 S50.00 219 CHERIMOYA 1 1 $200.00 220 CHERIMOYA 1 S50.00 221 CHERIMOYA 1 1 $350.00 222 CHERIMOYA 1 S50.00 223 CHERIMOYA 1 $50.00 224 CHERIMOYA 1 1 $200.00 225 CHERIMOYA 1 1 1 S560.00 226 CHERIMOYA 1 S50.00 227 TOKAY 1 S50.00 228 TOKAY 1 1 S350.00 229 TOKAY 1 1 S350.00 230 TOKAY 1 S50.00 231 TOKAY 1 S50.00 232 TOKAY 1 1 1 1 S760.00 233 TOKAY 1 1 1 1 S610.00 234 TOKAY 1 S50.00 235 TOKAY 1 $50.00 236 TOKAY 1 1 1 S500.00 237 TOKAY 1 1 1 S460.00 238 TOKAY 1 1 1 S460.00 239 TOKAY 1 $50.00 240 TOKAY 1 S50.00 241 TOKAY 1 S50.00 242 TOKAY 1 S50.00 243 TOKAY 1 S50.00 244 TOKAY 1 S50.00 245 TOKAY 1 1 S350.00 246 TOKAY 1 1 1 S500.00 247 TOKAY 1 $50.00 248 TOKAY 1 1 S100.00 249 TOKAY 1 1 S410.00 250 TOKAY 2 1 S770.00 SUBTOTAL S13,620.00 LOT NO. STREET FENCE SHRUB DRIVEWAY TREES MAILBOX TOTAL COST $360 EA S50 LS $300 EA $150 EA $50 LS 251 TOKAY 1 $50.00 252 TOKAY 1 $50.00 253 TOKAY 1 S50.00 254 TOKAY 1 $50.00 255 TOKAY 1 1 S350.00 256 TOKAY 1 1 S100.00 257 TOKAY 1 S50.00 258 TOKAY 1 S50.00 259 TOKAY 1 S50.00 260 TOKAY 1 S50.00 261 TOKAY 1 S50.00 262 TOKAY 1 $50.00 263 TOKAY 1 S50.00 264 TOKAY 1 1 S100.00 265 TOKAY 1 S50.00 266 TOKAY 1 $50.00 267 TOKAY 1 1 $100.00 268 TOKAY 1 1 1 S460.00 269 TOKAY 1 $50.00 270 TOKAY 1 S50.00 271 TOKAY 1 1 1 S710.00 272 TOKAY 1 $50.00 273 TOKAY 1 1 1 1 1 S910.00 274 TOKAY 1 S50.00 275 JACARANDA 1 1 1 1 S610.00 276 JACARANDA 1 1 S350.00 277 JACARANDA 1 1 S350.00 278 JACARANDA 1 1 1 S500.00 279 JACARANDA 1 1 S350.00 280 JACARANDA 1 1 S350.00 281 JACARANDA 1 S50.00 282 JACARANDA 1 1 S350.00 283 JACARANDA 1 1 S350.00 284 JACARANDA 1 1 S350.00 285 JACARANDA 1 1 S350.00 286 JACARANDA 1 1 S350.00 287 JACARANDA 1 1 S350.00 288 JACARANDA 1 1 S350.00 289 JACARANDA 1 1 1 S400.00 290 JACARANDA 1 1 S350.00 291 JACARANDA 1 1 1 S500.00 292 JACARANDA 1 1 S350.00 293 JACARANDA 1 1 S350.00 294 JACARANDA 1 1 1 1 S550.00 295 JACARANDA 1 1 S350.00 296 JACARANDA 1 1 S350.00 297 JACARANDA 1 S50.00 298 JACARANDA 1 1 1 S710.00 299 JACARANDA 2 2 1 S1,370.00 300 JACARANDA 1 S50.00 SUBTOTAL S13,970.00 LOT NO. STREET FENCE SHRUB DRIVEWAY TREES MAILBOX TOTAL COST $360 EA S50 LS S300 EA S150 EA S50 LS 301 JACARANDA 302 JACARANDA 303 JACARANDA 304 JACARANDA 305 JACARANDA 306 JACARANDA 307 JACARANDA 308 JACARANDA 1 309 JACARANDA 310 JACARANDA 311 JACARANDA 312 JACARANDA 313 JACARANDA 314 JACARANDA 315 JACARANDA 316 JACARANDA 317 JACARANDA 318 JACARANDA 319 JACARANDA 320 JACARANDA 321 JACARANDA 322 JACARANDA 323 CATAWBA 2 324 CATAWBA 325 CATAWBA 326 CATAWBA 1 327 CATAWBA 328 CATAWBA 329 CATAWBA 330 CATAWBA 331 CATAWBA 332 CATAWBA 333 CATAWBA 334 CATAWBA 335 CATAWBA 336 CATAWBA 337 CATAWBA 338 CATAWBA 339 CATAWBA 340 CATAWBA 341 CATAWBA 342 CATAWBA 1 343 CATAWBA 344 CATAWBA 345 CATAWBA 346 CATAWBA 347 CATAWBA 348 CATAWBA 349 CATAWBA 350 CATAWBA 1 1 1 1 1 S350.00 1 1 S350.00 1 1 S350.00 1 1 S350.00 1 1 1 S500.00 1 1 S400.00 1 1 S350.00 1 1 S710.00 1 1 S350.00 1 1 S350.00 1 1 S350.00 1 1 $350.00 1 1 S350.00 1 1 $350.00 1 1 S350.00 1 1 S350.00 1 1 1 S500.00 1 1 S350.00 1 1 S350.00 1 1 S350.00 1 1 1 S500.00 1 $50.00 1 1 S920.00 1 1 1 S910.00 1 $50.00 1 S410.00 1 S50.00 1 1 S200.00 1 S50.00 1 S50.00 1 1 S200.00 1 1 S200.00 1 S50.00 1 S50.00 1 S50.00 1 S50.00 1 $50.00 1 S50.00 1 $50.00 1 S50.00 1 1 S200.00 1 1 $560.00 1 S50.00 1 $460.00 1 $50.00 1 S50.00 1 S50.00 1 1 S350.00 1 1 $350.00 1 1 S350.00 SUBTOTAL S14,170.00 LOT NO. STREET FENCE SHRUB DRIVEWAY TREES MAILBOX TOTAL COST $360 EA S50 LS S300 EA S150 EA $50 LS 351 CATAWBA 1 $50.00 352 CATAWBA 1 S50.00 353 CATAWBA 1 $50.00 354 CATAWBA 1 1 S350.00 355 CATAWBA 1 1 S350.00 356 CATAWBA 1 1 1 S710.00 357 CATAWBA 1 1 S350.00 358 CATAWBA 1 1 1 1 S860.00 359 CATAWBA 1 1 1 1 S860.00 360 CATAWBA 1 1 1 S400.00 361 CATAWBA 1 1 S350.00 362 CATAWBA 1 S50.00 363 CATAWBA 1 1 1 S250.00 364 CATAWBA 1 1 1 S250.00 365 CATAWBA 1 1 1 1 S760.00 366 CATAWBA 1 1 1 S250.00 367 CATAWBA 1 1 S410.00 368 CATAWBA 1 $50.00 369 CATAWBA 1 S50.00 370 CATAWBA 1 S50.00 371 ALMERIA 2 1 1 S920.00 372 ALMERIA 1 1 S350.00 373 ALMERIA 1 1 S350.00 374 ALMERIA 1 S50.00 375 ALMERIA 1 1 S350.00 376 ALMERIA 1 1 1 S400.00 377 ALMERIA 1 1 $200.00 378 ALMERIA 1 1 S200.00 379 ALMERIA 1 S50.00 380 ALMERIA 1 1 S350.00 381 ALMERIA 1 S50.00 382 ALMERIA 1 S50.00 383 ALMERIA 1 S50.00 384 ALMERIA 1 1 S350.00 385 ALMERIA 1 1 S350.00 386 ALMERIA 1 $50.00 387 ALMERIA 1 S50.00 388 ALMERIA 1 S50.00 389 ALMERIA 1 S50.00 390 ALMERIA 1 S50.00 391 ALMERIA 1 S50.00 392 ALMERIA 1 1 1 S710.00 393 ALMERIA 1 1 S350.00 394 ALMERIA 1 $50.00 SUBTOTAL S11,980.00 GRAND TOTAL S92,460.00 FONTANA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY HIGHLAND HAVEN TR 3348 RELOCATIONS. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE NOT BEEN QUANTIFIED OR ESTIMATED FOR COST, BUT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED. THIS TABLE REPRESENTS A LIST OF POTENTIAL RELOCATIONS. POWER POLES SERVICE POLES GUY WIIRES FIRE HYDRANTS VALVE CANS (GAS & WATER) WATER SERVICE METERS STOP SIGNS STREET SIGNS WARNING SIGNS UNDERGROUND PIPES UNDERGROUND CONDUIT FONTANA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY HIGHLAND HAVEN TR 3348 POTHOLE ESTIMATED COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS COST UNIT TOTAL 1. BACKHOE MOVE -IN 1 L.S. $1,500 $1,500 COST 2. SURVEY CREWS MARK 1 L.S. $1,500 $1,500 POTHOLE LOCATIONS 3. BACKHOE OPERATOR 22 EA. $200 $4,400 DIGS HOLES 4. SURVEY CREWS READ 22 EA. $100 $2,200 ELEVATIONS 5. COMPLETE POTHOLE 1 L.S. $0 $0 MAP 6. PAVEMENT COLD 220 S.F. $5 $1,100 PATCHING TOTAL COST FOR POTHOLE WORK $10,700 R-62' I\ L 1•�'4 SCALE: 1" = 20' OPTION 1 175 R-20' R-i5' R-50' 176 13' 177 179 PLOT OF TORREY AND CHERIMOYA 194 (O. 507) PF: 3348 53 i7-Jun-S SCALE: 1" = 20' R-15' OPTION 2 175 i2' i8' 18' 176 12' 30' 30 PLOT OF TORREY AND CHERIMOYA 194 (O. 507J PF: 3348 53 17-Jun- Rai5 SCALE: 1 " = 20' R-20' R-15' OPTION 3 175 12' i8' Ra.S01' 18' 176 12' 30' 30' 51' 178 179 PLOT OF TORREY ANO CHERIMOYA '- 194 (O. 507] PF: 3348 53 17-Jun-91 FONTANA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY HIGHLAND HAVEN TR 3348 PRIVATE PROPERTY GRADING PHASE I ONLY LOT CUT TO FILL TO NUMBER P.L. P.L. (FEET) (FEET) COMMENTS Lots 1 thru 59 front on Highland or Citrus, no proposed improvements. Lots 12 & 13 have side lot frontage on Catawba north. 12 0.0 2.0 Side lot only 13 0.3 1.0 Side lot only 60 0.0 0.0 61 0.0 0.5 62 0.0 1.0 63 0.0 1.0 64 0.0 0.5 VACANT 65 0.0 0.0 VACANT 66 0.0 0.5 VACANT 67 0.0 0.5 68 0.0 1.0 69 0.0 2.0 WORST CASE LOT 70 0.0 1.0 71 0.0 0.5 72 0.0 0.0 73 0.0 0.0 VACANT 74 0.3 0.0 75 0.5 0.0 76 0.3 0.0 77 0.5 0.0 VACANT 78 0.7 0.0 79 0.3 0.0 80 0.0 0.0 VACANT 81 0.0 0.3 82 0.0 0.5 83 0.3 0.5 Cut on side lot 84 0.3 0.0 85 0.5 0.0 86 0.3 0.0 87 0.3 0.0 VACANT 88 0.3 0.0 89 0.3 0.0 90 0.0 0.0 91 0.0 0.3 92 0.0 0.0 VACANT 93 0.0 1.0 VACANT 94 0.0 1.0 95 0.0 1.0 VACANT 96 0.0 1.5 VACANT 97 0.0 1.0 98 0.0 0.5 • 99 0.0 0.0 100 1.5 0.5 101 0.3 0.3 102 0.5 0.0 103 0.5 0.0 104 0.0 1.0 156 0.0 0.0 157 0.5 0.0 158 1.0 0.0 159 0.5 0.0 160 1.5 0.0 161 1.5 0.0 162 0.3 0.0 163 0.3 0.0 275 0.0 0.3 276 0.0 0.3 277 0.3 0.0 278 0.3 0.0 279 0.0 0.0 280 0.0 0.3 281 0.0 0.3 282 0.0 0.3 283 0.3 0.0 284 0.3 0.0 285 0.5 0.0 286 1.0 0.0 287 1.0 0.0 288 0.5 0.0 289 0.3 0.0 290 0.0 0.0 291 0.5 0.0 292 0.0 0.0 293 0.0 0.0 294 0.0 0.0 295 0.3 0.0 296 0.5 0.0 297 1.3 0.3 298 1.5 0.0 299 2.0 0.0 300 2.5 0.0 301 2.0 0.0 302 1.5 0.0 303 1.0 0.0 304 0.5 0.0 305 0.3 0.0 306 0.0 0.0 307 0.3 0.0 308 0.3 0.0 309 0.5 0.0 310 0.5 0.0 311 0.3 0.0 312 0.0 0.0 313 0.0 0.0 314 0.0 0.3 315 0.0 0.3 316 0.0 0.5 317 0.0 0.5 318 0.0. 1.0 319 0.0 1.5 320 0.0 2.0 VACANT Cut on side lot only Cut on side lot only VACANT WORST CASE LOT 321 •0.0 322 0.0 323 0.0 1.5 1.0 0.0 Side lot only = == = J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. -Eirs SS MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING DIVISION 0 3426 TENTH STREET P.O. BOX 493 RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502 (714) 683-0209 SLOPE TO MATCH EXISTING GRADE AT R/W SLOPE TO MATCH EXISTING GRADE AT R/W R/W 6 12' T.C. 18' 5.5' R/W I 4.5' 4' IO' • IO' 10' 18' T.C. voint T.C. wor 20' V RAILS VARIES t60 ' VMocs Z.= 20' 4' VP R/W 12' T.C. 5.5' 4 ►�"' SLOPE TO MATCH EXISTING 10' R/W • 8' A% 12' 12' 8' 2s 22 4' 4.5' PROPOSED TYPICAL STREET SECTION S GRADE AT R/W SLOPE TO MATCH EXISTING GRADE AT R/W FONTANA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY HIGHLAND HAVEN FEE DISTRICT COST ANALYSIS ITEM # 1 -SANITARY SEWER, TRENCH REPAIR AND PAVEMENT OVERLAY: - Construct 8" sewer $583,735 - Construct 21" sewer $216,259 - Construct 21" sewer in Citrus Avenue $217,278 - Trench repair / Overlay $251,640 SUBTOTAL $1,268,912 Reimbursement for upsizing of sewer $112,600 Reimbursement for upsizing sewer in Citrus $96,750 SUBTOTAL $209,350 - Design phase Engineering (includes soils) $79,620 Surveying $26,983 Pothole locations (estimated) $10,700 - Construction phase Bid assisstance $1,913 Construction management $86,780 Construction staking (estimated) $150,000 As-builts $8,828 - Other costs Reproduction costs $1,272 Plan check fees $0 Permit fees $0 SUBTOTAL TOTAL - Contingency Legal, contract admin & const. @20% Bond costs @ 15% GRAND TOTAL $366,096 $1,425,658 $285,132 $213,849 $1,924,638 FONTANA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY HIGHLAND HAVEN FEE DISTRICT COST ANALYSIS ITEM #2 - STREET AND Construct Construct - Construct - Construct Construct Construct Construct Construct Construct - Construct STORM DRAIN 18" R.C.P. 24" R.C.P. 30" R.C.P. 36" R.C.P. 39" R.C.P. 42" R.C.P. 48" R.C.P. 51" R.C.P. 60" R.C.P. structures SUBTOTAL Construct street, curb & sidewalk Construct driveways Construct miscellaneous street items SUBTOTAL - Design phase Engineering ( includes Surveying - Construction phase Bid assisstance Construction management Construction staking Relocations private As-builts Other costs Reproduction costs Plan check fees Permit fees soils SUBTOTAL TOTAL (estimated) (estimated) - Contingency Legal, contract admin & const. @20% Bond costs @ 15% $4,600 $21,900 $25,610 $30,590 $31,760 $1,131 $3,016 $143,400 $1,120 $240,871 $503,998 $244,211 $24,625 $98,135 $366,971 $210,075 $29,972 $1,913 $95,500 $150,000 $92,460 $8,500 $1,272 $0 $0 $589,692 $1,460,661 $292,132 $219,099 GRAND TOTAL $1,971,892 • • MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF FONTANA CALIFORNIA SEE DISTRIBUTION LIST N MAGGIE PACHECO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT COORDINATOR JUNE 6, 1991 OFFER TO PURCHASE REAL PROPERTY QUEENIE LYNCH AND RICHARD LYNCH APN NO.'S 228-131-08, 09 Please review the attached documents at your earliest convenience, and return any comments you may have by June 14, 1) Offer to Purchase Real Property; 2) Right -of -Way Agreement; and 3) Appraisal Report. Also, it would be appreciated if you would inform me as to who in " 59Ablic Works will sign the formal offers, and whether the City 441eouncil will have to take formal action on this matter. If you have any questions, please give me a call at Ext. 6739. Thank you for your assistance. MP:nd ,Ken Jeske Ray Wellington Felipe Molinos Steve Deitsch Distribution List: )\ 0') 1991: fir or 4,6K cog4N1," as._. :39: a3:mac • y ,0,-,e-c647Ae 2 �i�9Gh //,�fP'/7/ d% fi/IO'rC/i ly !)C2g;ie k200"" /71. /'°/-'''720 X /ee,951,-±1-effri-eroicE 744 /o7i-A9/p12;57 ;4'5 40-eq/ v4 ate : °V' /,y1i 4POt , /?may 4m 4'% 01* / 1749/%" %. Subject: OFFE TO PURCHASE REAL PROPERTY PROJECT: No• Fontana/Highland Haven." ° 4)0av-e/711° /1V! OWNER: eenie. Lynch, a widow i �e /_ ASSESSOR'S 'ARCEL NO. 228-131-08 .,� �/�i //? /rn:�/ 7Lh O l 04.0W, 7 PROPERTY IEREST TO BE ACQUIRED: public street �aannd sewer �e�easements A LEGAL DES'RIPTION OF EASEMENT PARCEL OF PROPERTY TO BE ACQUIRED: See Exhibit "A") attached hereto The City of Fontana hereby offers to purchase the real property interest stated above for the appraised fair market value of: 1. Street Easement: 2. Sewer Easement: Total Compensation: C'TY OF FONTANA,-a M By: $16,700 3,500 $20,200 Corporation .>?: a?:<< Date: Subject: OFFER TO PURCHASEREAL PROPERTY PROJECT: North Fontana/Highland Haven OWNER; Richard H. Lynch, a single man ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 228-131-09 PROPERTY INTEREST TO BE ACQUIRED: public sewer easement LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT PARCEL OF PROPERTY TO BE ACQUIRED: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto The City of Fontana hereby offers to purchase the real property interest stated above for the appraised fair market value of: $ 1,600 CITY OF FONTANA, a Mun ipal Corporation By : i Project: City of Fontana North Fontana/Highland Haven Assessor's Parcel No. RIGHT-OF-WAY AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into this • day of 1991, by and between the CITY OF FONTANA, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred tows "CITY" and hereinafter referred to as "GRANTOR". RECITALS 1. The City of Fontana desires to acquire an easement for sewer purposes and an easement for street purposes in and to that certain real property situated in the City of Fontana, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof, from the GRANTOR for its North Fontana/Highland Haven Project. 2. The CITY has secured an independent real estate appraisal of the easement parcel(s) of property as described in said Exhibit "A" for the purpose of establishing the fair market value of said easement(s). 3. The CITY presented to the GRANTOR a written offer to purchase and an appraisal summary, as required under California Government Code Sections 7260 et sue. 4. The GRANTOR is willing to convey said easement(s) upon the terms and conditions herein contained. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: The CITY shall: (a) Pay the undersigned GRANTOR the sum of $ for the easement(s) being conveyed as described in Exhibit "A". This amount includes payment for any and .??: • • C o y► y N eJ \� . (all improvements lying within the area as described in said Exhibit "A". Payment shall be made when title to said property interest in the land described in Exhibit "A" vests in the city of Fontana, free and clear of all liens, encumberances, assessments, easements and leases (recorded and unrecorded) except: (i) Covenants, conditions, restrictions and reservations of record. (ii) Easements or rights of way for public or quasi -public utility or public street purposes, if any. (b) Retain option of utilizing escrow as a method of processing the conveyance of the easement(s) to the City. Processing shall be done at no cost to GRANTOR. (c) Forward any and all monies payable under this agreement to the beneficiary of the Deed of Trust affecting the easement (s) to the CITY (with written notice to GRANTOR) , in the event the beneficiary demands in writing that part or all.of the compensation be applied to the loan in accordance with the provisions of the Deed of Trust. (d) Have the authority to deduct and pay from the amount shown above, any amount necessary to satisfy any delinquent taxes due in any fiscal year, except the fiscal year in which this transaction closes, together with penalties and interests thereon, and/or delinquent or non -delinquent assessments or bonds, except those which title is to be taken subject to in accordance with the terms of this agreement. The GRANTOR shall: (a) Execute an Easement Deed, conveying the easement(s) to the CITY as described in Exhibit "A". (b) warrant that there are no oral or written leases on all or any portion of the property exceeding a period of one month, and the GRANTOR:further agrees to hold the CITY _harmless and reimburse the CITY for any and all of its losses and expenses occaisioned by reason of any lease of said property held by any tenant of GRANTOR for a period exceeding one month. (c) Execute a Right of Entry Permit, granting permission to the CITY, its agents or assigns to enter upon the area described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof for construction and related purposes. This right of entry is to terminate upon .completion of construction — of public improvements within said easements. (d) The undersigned GRANTOR hereby agrees and consents to the dismissal of any eminent domain action in the Superior Court wherein the herein describe•.. and is included and also waives any and all claims of oney which may be on deposit in said action.111, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement the date and year first written. Recommended for Approval: `R'ight o� Way Representative Approved as tolForm: By: City Attorney GRANTOR: CITY OF FONTANA By: Tr Tr i 0 AC Lea Associa , Y Real Estate Consul;/7* /iff17/,i Mr. Eiichi Koba) 1125 North Oakda eph P.O. Box 3729 Fullerton, Calif ,,!,n , , rii:•, MAI trev T. \.u:'.:k: :r,ms T;I",n ::ck l'. io:erh (tch.iel V. Leon:; M:ch.,e! Ch.lrle- E. ! :rr•, l:•:r� R. Mein Ro!•ert N. I ! ;r.1 .Ann.: NI. I! r_cnt:n Appraisal Report: street Easements th Properties _dna/Highland Haven Fontana, California Job No. 2002 Dear Mr. Kobayashi: In accordance with your request, this writing transmits three copies of our narrative appraisal report concerning the above - referenced properties. The report which follows describes the properties, their environs, the work carried out in this assignment, our analyses and supporting data. Based on our investigations and analyses, we conclude that, as of May 15, 1991, the subject properties have fair market values as follows: Larger Parcel: Parts Taken: Severance Damages: Total Award: Queenie Lynch (APN 228-131-8) $285,000 20,200 - 0 - $ 20,200, Richard Lynch (APN 228-131-9) $285,000 1,600 - 0 - S 1,600 Please see the "Valuation Summary" for further detail. .L This report and valuation are con ige , ,,upont;e., eip .and review of the far'tM"?' ": _ •P Legal descriptions for the parts taken; The precise wording of these easements; Final right of way mapping displaying easements and area calculations; Information on costs of public improvements will occupy the easement areas. the that Lea Associates, Inc. Real Estate Consultants 1635 Pontius Avenue Los Angeles, California 90025 Telephone (213) 477-6595 Fax: (213) 477-5697 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Subject Property: Queenie Lynch Location: Southerly terminus of Almeria Street, 700± ft. southerly of Los Cedros Avenue Assessor's Parcel No.: Site Area: 228-131-8 5.00 Acs. (217,800± sf) Zone: A-1 Land Use Designation: R-PC Flood Hazard Richard Lynch Southerly terminus of Catawba Avenue, 700± ft. southerly of Los Cedros Avenue 228-232-9 5.00 Acs. (217,800± sf) A-1 R-PC Rating: Zone C, Zone C, Minimal Flooding Minimal Flooding Present Use: Vacant Highest and Best Use: Residential Development Date of Value: Value Indications: Larger Parcel: Parts Taken: Severance Damages: Total Award: NO • • Vacant Residential Development May 15, 1991 May 15, 1991 S� . % : r° $285,000 9% $ 20,200 0 - $ 20.200 $285,000 $ 1,600 - 0 - $ 1. 600, • This summary represents only a portion of a complete appraisal report and is invalid outside the context of the entire document.