Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
South Highland Sewer - South Highland And Juniper Avenue Sew
7 , kikAssociated Engineers, Inc. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 3311 E.SHELBY STREET,ONTARIO,CA 91764-4872 (909)980-1982 FAX(909)941-0891 ' --;--,.-:1';',' 0,'6618 9 707772 v. April 7,2003 / APR 21X3 v" ., Mr. Scott Snyder Engineering Construction,Inc. �cl j MCO /` A.O. GeneralE g g p 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. f Suite 106/101 9��� bZ E Z���. Burbank, CA 91504 • Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— Settlement for Outstanding Claims >.$ • Dear Mr. Snyder: ill Pursuant to our meeting with Ayala Boring, Inc, and Mr.Bryan Kier, A.D. General, on Friday, April 4. 2003 at the offices of Associated Engineers, Inc., we are prepared to offer the following settlement g'i terms to address all of A.D. General's outstanding claims. -11 t. A. Ayala Boring, Inc. Claim for Production Impacts — We have reviewed the construction records for the installation of the 36" steel casing on South Highland Avenue across Sierra _ Avenue, and discussed the problems Ayala Boring, Inc. encountered in installing the casing. Based on our records and those conversations, due to the need to manually clear rock from within the casing,the casing installation rate was reduced by 50%, requiring an additional three I (3)days to install the casing. Using the daily work records, we have determined that the work performed on August 29, 2003, August 30, 2003, and September 4, 2003 were directed toward removing the rock. Therefore, we have agreed to, and Ayala°Boring, Inc. has concurred, that the impacts of the additional work resulting in $11,323.63 in additional costs. We will recommend that amount be included in a change order to "Item No. 15, Construct Microtunneling, complete with 36-inch steel.casing,jacking pit, receiving pit, redwood skids, etc. all per details". In addition, you have requested that additional bonding fees be added to the total cost in the amount of$226.48. This amount will be added to the change order,but will not be paid until A.D. General provides copies of updated bonds showing the increased contract amount. B. A.D. General Claims—We currently have several claims from A.D. General that we discussed with Mr. Bryan Kier of your office. These are as follows: 1. Olsen Pre-cast—claim dated November 13, 2002, in the amount of$1,035.00. 2. Irrigation Line Replacement—claim dated October 23, 2002, in the amount of$8,700.00. Subsequently superceded by claims dated January 9, 2002 in the amount of$464.04, January 9, 2003 in the amount of $3,862.33, and January 9, 2003 in the amount of $1,701.96, for a ,. total revised claim amount of$6,028.33, i O'.V08-NO12001\01-064\Final Clam Settlement Letter a?03.ua PLANNING DESIGNING SURVEYING I I 3. Delay on Walnut due to soils testing—claim dated January 9, 2003, in the amount of $1,838.49. 4. Delay due to PacBell interference—claim dated January 9, 2003, in the amount of $1,325.79. 5. Claim for Late Payment—claim dated January 9, 2003, in the amount of$2,967.29. The total of all claims is $13,194.90 using the revised claim amounts for the irrigation line repair. After reviewing the backup submitted on these claims, and reviewing the terms of the Contract and Green Book, we are willing to recommend to the City of Fontana that an amount equal to $3,325.79 be paid for these claims. We can find no provision in the Contract or the Green Book which would support a claim for the Olsen Pre-cast claim (Claim No. 1), or provisions which entitle A.D. General to late charges on progress payments (No.5). Therefore, no compensation is included for these items: Claim No. 3 was for work associated with re-working areas that failed compaction that would not have required re- testing if A.D. General's original compaction work had met specifications. Therefore, we Claim No. 4 will be recommended for$1,325.79, and Claim No. 2 for$2,000.00 for materials installed. If you are in agreement with the total settlement amount of$14,875.90 for all outstanding claims, please sign and return a copy of this letter and we can process the change order documents. If you have any questions,please feel free to contact me at(909) 980-1982. Yours truly, . ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS INC. AGREED BY: A.D.GENERAL ENGINEERING INC. • Thomas R.Holliman,PE Senior Project Manager SCOTT SNYDER cc: President Ralph Roberts,A-t Date: J.N. 01-064 / South Highland Sewer Updated April23,2002 Highlighted Activities are Complete li Activity Description Early Start Early Finish 2001 I 2002 I I 2003 NDJF MIAIMJIJASON I D JIF MA M I JIJ I A S OINID Design Design Work Start Jul 2,01 90%Design Jul 3,01 Dec21,01 City Design Review Dec 24,01 Jan 21,02 100%Design Jan 22,02 Feb 26,02 City Design Review Feb 27,02 Mar-22 Apr 2 Final Design Mar 23 Apr 3 Mar- Apr 11 Drawing Submittal/Design Phase Complete Mac-31 Apr 14 II Environmental Draft initial Study/Neg Dec Start Jan 21,02 Draft Initial Study/Neg Dec Jan 21,02 Feb 15,02 City Review Feb 16,02 Mar 6,02 Address City Comments Mar 7,02 Mar 15,02 Contact Newspaper Re:Council-Public Hearing of Neg Dec Mar 18,02 Publish Date for Notice Re:Council Hearing of Neg Dec Mar 21,02 20 Day Public Review Period Mar 21,02 Apr 9,02 Submit Staff Report to City Clerk for Council Action Apr.16 Apr 1,02 I Respond to Public Comments(None Received) Apr 10,02 Apr 15,02 -City Council Public Hearing/Approval of Neg Dec Apr 16,02 Environmental Process Complete/File Notice of Determination Apr46 Apr 17 Constructor Selection Construction Bid Process Start Apr 16,02 Council Authorizes Bidding Process Apr 16,02 I Print 45 Sets of Plans and Specifications Apr 4-7 30 Apr 21 May 1 Contact Newspaper Re:Notice Inviting Bids Apr 22 29 Notice Inviting Bids Published(2 Newspapers,2 Thursdays) Apr 25 May 2 May 9,02 Four Three Week Bidding Period Apr 25 May 2 May 23,02 Submit Staff Report to City Clerk for Council Action Jun.4 May 20,02 Open Bids May 23,02 Council Awards Bid t.1,.tt..- ,.., f} F,i..,-.-.r t 4,,.A..,.77-.,...r Jun 4,02 20 Contractor Finalizes Contract/Bonding/Insurance,. Jun 4,02 Jun 14/,,02 Preconstruction Meeting Jun 11,02 City Review of Contract/Bonding/Insurance Jun 14,02 Jun 18,02 Contract Executed 27 Jun j.02 Notice To Proceed(Const to begin within 10 days) Jun 19,02 I I Construction Bid Process Complete Jun 19,02 Construction Construction Start Jul 1,02 Construction Along Walnut Street(24 Working Days) Jul 1,02 Aug 1,02 Construction Along Juniper and So.Highland(31 Wrkg Days) Aug 1,02 Sep 15,02 • Construction Complete Sep 15,02 Close Out Project Closeout Start Sep 16,02 Update City Records Sep 16,02 Dec 16,02 Warranty Period Sep 16,02 Sep 15,03 Valuation of CIP Improvement Dec 16,02 • I NO Complete Sep 15,03 I 1 1 sewer schedule rev 2.xls South Highland Sewer I 1 I Updated April 23I,2002 Highlighted Activities are Complete Activity Description Early Start Early Finish 2001 I 2002 I I I I I 2003 I NID JIF MIAIMIJIJ AISIOINID JIF M AIMIJIJIAISIO NID I I I I Design I Design Work Start Jul 2,01 I I 90%Design Jul 3,01 Dec 21,01 City Design Review Dec 24,01 Jan 21,02 100%Design - Jan 22,02 Feb 26,02 City Design Review Feb 27,02 Mar-22 Apr 2 Final Design Mar 23Apr 3 Mar 31 Apr 11 Drawing Submittal/Design Phase Complete Mar 31 Apr 11 • Environmental I Draft Initial Study/Neg Dec Start Jan 21,02 - Draft Initial Study/Neg Dec Jan 21,02 Feb 15,02 City Review Feb 16,132 Mar 6,02 ' Address City Comments Mar 7,02 Mar 15,02 I I Contact Newspaper Re:Council Public Hearing of Neg Dec Mar 18,02 Publish Date for Notice Re:Council Hearing of Neg Dec Mar 21,02 20 Day Public Review Period Mar 21,02 Apr 9,02 Submit Staff Report to City Clerk for Council Action Apr.16 Apr 1,02 Respond to Public Comments(None Received) Apr 10,02 Apr 15,02 I City Council Public Hearing/Approval of Neg Dec Apr 16,02 Environmental Process Complete/File Notice of Determination Apr 17 Constructor Selection . \ Construction Sid Process Start Apr 16,02 Council Authorizes Bidding Prorasc: - Apr 16,02 Print'45'Sett OfPians and Specifications Apr 4-7 30` Apr 21 May 1 Contact Newspaper Re:Notice Inviting=Bids'" Apr 2229 • I Notice Inviting Bids.Published(2 Newspapers,2 Thursdays) Apr 25 May 2 May 9,02 - Four Three Week Bidding Period Apr 25 May 2 May 23,02 Submit Staff Report to City Clerk for Council Action Jun.4 May20,02 Open Bids May 23,02 Council Awards Bid tivt-r,a-•z-, s?-.,,i- <i,r.-,,.t4u. (4,12" 1un 4,02 1 Contractor Finalizes Contract/Bonding/Insurance i••-.•...,. Jun 4;02 , Juno 02-=-1 Preconstruction Meeting Jun*4 02 z© - City Review of Contract/Bonding/Insurance y,,,04 Jun IA',02 Jun 10,0227 Contract Executed Jun 18,02s1 Notice To Proceed(Const to begin within 10 days) Jun',9;0227 Construction Bid Process Complete Jun 0 027-7 I I Construction - Construction Start Jul 1,02 1411 . Construction Along Walnut Street(24 Working Days) Jul•y,02-7 Aug 1-,02 cj' I Construction Along Juniper and So.Highland(31 Wrkg Days) Aug 1,02 Ccp 15,02 Oct 5 Construction Complete Sep-1-5-02 Oct Close Out • PrOj ttCtuseO•ut-Start rt,.,,r,:%ifr.r+•,• r••;- iii..f,�ru4Vic..,- Sep46-02^ 3-',i7 b7 Update City Records pled-„„ Sep 16,02 Dec 16?02 Warranty Period Sep 16,02 Sep 15,03 Valuation of CIP Improvement Dec 16,02 Project Complete Sep 15,03 sewer schedule rev 2.xls South Highland Sewer Schedule and Responsibilities Activity Start Date Finish Date Responsibility Address City Comments Mar 7, 02 Mar 15, 02 David Evans &Assoc. to send out Initial Study/Neg Dec to agencies on distribution list. Will send with it Notice of Availability of Draft Initial Study and Mitigate Negative Declaration Contact Newspaper For Notice Re: Mar 18, 02 Mar 18, 02 Carla Pursel, City of Council Public Hearing/Approval of Fontana Neg Dec on April 16. Also send Initial Study andCEQA-forms to County Clerk for filing. � °�!r' `' Publish Date for Notice Re: Mar 21, 02 Mar 21, 02 N/A Council Public Hearing/Approval of Neg Dec on April 16 20 Day Public Review Period Mar 21, 02 Apr 9, 02 Carla Pursel/George\ Harvilla Post Notice of Intent to Adopt a Neg Dec/Mitigated Neg Dec and Initial Study at City Clerk's office and at front counter Submit Staff Report to City Clerk Apr 1, 02 Apr 1, 02 Carla Pursel, City of for Council Action Apr. 16 Fontana City Council Public Apr 16, 02 Apr 16, 02 N/A Hearing/Approval oft Neg. Dec.e , ope.. 1, 1 4 south_highland_schedule.doc South Highland Sewer Environmental Schedule Page 1 of INIMIS1411re21 >< 14` * 1 ? ose From: Harvilla, George To: 'rsha@deainc.com'; 'cpursel@fontana.org '; 'dbrazill@fontana.org '; 'cousley@fontana.org ' Cc: Subject: South Highland Sewer Environmental Schedule Sent: 3/7/02 9:33 PM S Importance: Normal After consulting with all of you, I believe I have the schedule finalized (attached). Thanks for your input. Rebecca, please send one additional copy to me when you send out the Initial Studies. I think that makes a total of 14 copies. George south highland schedule.doc http://mail.pbworldnet.com/exchange/forms/I PM/NOTE/read.asp?command=open&ob,.. 3/7/02 1 Activity Early Early Orig Rem mirmaint t i_ t r i t• t t i t; Description Start Finish Dur Dur nrnranntr1reinnP nnnnmr•»rinnmii�n ;mm�nnr nm�n innnr��Tnr,i�nnnmrlr]nnr�PlPnnnnnwrlr3mnftiUnrnrnr•Ir1riinnUf. Highland/Juniper/Walnut Sewer r,^ n� t.. + 1 t ,<k& .�� Msfa +i 4 _C"' A. i I �.Desi rr�Construct�Sewer r,., , r �a_ .�T, � . ��.�;�. .,���� ���s € i � 1 1 i ; Stat Design Work JUL-02-01A 0 r► Start Design Work 90%Deign JUL-0301A DEG21-01A 124 1I 90°. tsign f QlyDesignReiw DEC-2401A JAN-21-02A 20 IIlk.:bJesign • 100'/o Design .IAN-22-QA FEB2oQ7A 14 $ 1941%r !QyDesigiP,atw F -27-02A MAR-1502 29 11V Cif t3iesig ftevi w Desiga Phase Car>piete MAR ,♦>15O2 0 8 '•-,.Com �plete { ' Enuiar>ErfsiRmseStat JAN-21-02A 0 r • E vi omentai Phase Start Dr�tIrts1Stu*N gDec JAN•21-02A FEB-1502A 10 • D ft Initial1Study/Nfg Dec CiyPeueN FEB•1802A MARC602 13 ' City Revibw Atdess Camieis MAR -02 MAR-1502 7 AT Address CitYCo ments11 . _. _ -.:.: C.�.�-<<F h./ch.;y.�r,•r. MAR1802 —.MAR — 3 i .� Advertise in Newspaper 1 i Nolte Rtfr h Date MAR21-02 0 •j 4,Notice •ublish Date it f iale ., e d i H. .�: 1\ Publi R'�� no PitfcReiEuvFeriod ...„....-rev �., v,e MAR -02 AFR-0902 20 r E r bPiticQxrrrieris APR1002 AFR$02/$ 5 1AV Res••i nseto Pf ublic Comments • S1affF2epatlorCarxiAeSm AFR1tYtQ APF�1602' 5 AV Subn?itt Staff Report fo CouncilAction id r R• ik 1-leariigfCotrApprr7✓al APR16C2 0 • • Public Hearing/Counc Approvl EnvicmatiFheeCanpleb APR1602 0 •_ • • Enviromentai Phase Complete t ( ( C• crtsiructcrSetclicn t CcostarEcn Ed Plumes Stat MAR18-02 0 r • ConstrubtionBidiProces-Start Catract Bid Process MAR1802 AFR-a 32 A®V Col rlract Bid IlProcess CmtractAwad Romss MAY-01-02 MAY-31-02 22 i AliY Contract Award P •cess CcastrucfonBidRt SCompfste MAY31-02 0 r • Construction Bid •rocess omplete / ' Ccnsbulion J ' Carstrirdiar Slat JUN-0602 0 • • Construction Start I! i ; CarstrtxonOperatons JUN-0302 AJG2602 60 :r' A YConstructonOper•tions eli , Q• x ruikn Ccmpizte AUG26CP 0 r ♦ Construct on Corn•lete r t PirjectCbseoitStat AUG-27-02 01 r ill • Project CI•seout S art a� UpdieCtyRexrds AUG27-02 /N3✓-19432 W. :r ©-Update Ci Record 1 s F WaratyPaiod AUG27-02 r AUG-22 ,22' At AIIIIIIIIIIMIEMIIIIIIIIIIIIIINH1111111111110 Varranty Period r ValrtimOfClArca rust I NCV--1902 ' 0 $ I •Vdluation of Cip Im•roveemen't i 1 ProjedCcmpiete \ AUG-22-It • v Project Co plete Start Date .uwV-09-01 Robe City of Fontana Sheet 8 of 39 Finish Date == -11 W.Weddle,P.E. - :" FACAblert W4at lkArRaCiettE , $Po: . Data Date _:- - -D1-02 Capital Improvements Program v$) it I si-accravtelrn et ratn 'r .9 r Run Date '. -18432•14 ©Primavera Systems;inc. _ Master Prograrn4Schedule i Project Status Sheet Updated March 18, 2002 South Highland Sewer Design NTP: July 2, 2001 Original Completion Date: Feb. 8, 2002 Revised Completion Date: March 1, 2002 (Lateral was added) Design Fee: $761450 `6 G,ea 0 0 4- 1',o (L Engineer's Construction Estimate: $527,000. $850,000 budgeted from Sewer Fund. Construction Estimated Bid Opening Date: Ma3v22)02 Bid Amount: (, t 5— Estimated Completion Date: Aul gust-2002 Current Status To Do Engineering • City conducting plan check(began 2-27. Revised Associated Engineers (PM: Tom Holliman)has Traffic Sheets were submitted 3-14). Review must submitted 100% plans for plan check. be completed soon for bidding process to go forward. • eerge to b6ginabiddireprocess r March t8 iNili talk to Yousuf TmMwill submitwproposal for Inspectjon, C M , and Geotech by3 8 Const. staking is already in their scope. Environmental Status • 'htevvspaper noti ce to be_published:Mar:21'= conta4paperl118 • 20-Day Public Review period (Mar 21 —Apr 9) • City Council Approval (Apr. 16) • Begin Bidding process Summit Avenue Design NTP: May 21, 2001 Original Completion Date: March 11, 2002 , Design Fee: $562,100 tP), o too (CI, v ) f1 /. I� e a /-, f f l ! Engineer's Construction Estimate: $437-200000' e « i''3' 66 0, Construction Estimated Bid Opening Date: • ovember 2002- Bid Amount: �� � E:� • Estimated Completion Date: November-2003 Current Status To Do Engineering • Hall and Foreman submitted 90% plans on Feb. 18. City conducting plan check (forwarded to RASA). • Get familiar with parcel maps and plans' • Respd fo E mail RegCltrans easement (consult with Paul, Felipe,and Delia) S� r . , G /e,„ s✓i p. , ��t ��— 2 ,I Az Environmental tx, , f cfri E` k,—, k Ben sent Notice to Proceed on Feb. 5 to David • David Evans will complete described 4 task turnkey Evans and Associates (Josephine Alido). Cost effort except City to provide existing and future traffic will be $19,015 from Account 95216. volumes (done). Target date for completion is six weeks from Notice To Proceed (March 19). This will be'delayed due to the possibility-tire stone listed, George sent Notice to Proceed on Feb. 22 to channel might be considered a cultural landmark Josephine Alido for Env. Site.Assessment(ESA) from an old irrigation project. If the channels are not for$9,350. addressedAn the Sierra Cakes EIR(Josephine 'checking), then they will have to be investigated further. This'will require a change in scope. George sent a Notice to Proceed on Feb. 27 to Josephine to extend the Initial Study from San Sevaine Channel to Beech. f-a fr Current Status To Do Right of Way Developers responsible for 20 parcels per City • Carla Pursel updating status sheet of all parcels. Council authority to condemn as necessary on Oct 2001. Kim Reed advises 19 parcels now in possession of City except for lone parcel in front of future High School at corner Lytle Creek Rd. This parcel (including bus turnout)will be acquired by FUSD then be deeded to City. City responsible to acquire approx. 17 parcels per Todd Schmieder from Hall & Foreman. H & F • Received Grant Deeds and Legal description for has drawn up composite drawing showing Parcels 5-17 on Feb. 15. City is now conducting parcels responsibility of Developers vs. parcels plan check (RASA).— responsibility of City. Two corner parcels at Mango will be responsibility of City of Rialto to acquire once H & F gets description to City Engineer Tim Mim Mack. Right of Way Agreement with School District A separate item in earlier discussion with FUSD • It was suggested thatGeorge get copy of some was agreement by Frank Shuma and Patti prior CityfrUSD agreement via Engineering and Ashton where City and FUSD should enter into try drafting language with Paul B help to get agreement stating City will pay for Summit Ave starts .._ frontage of future high school incl. C&G, SW, curb return type driveway into school &street lights. (School to be responsible for R/W 7 ,••�, ,„ acquisition of Summit along frontage and deed to b,t� ,f City, arranged I believe by Kim Reed.). Further, . 11. ;) !i t, „ r'f?k FUSD states they want to apply for school bond money from state for equivalent cost for Summit Ave but substitute to pave Knox Ave. instead. FUSD applying for funds for Lytle Creek and Summit. School would take money for Summit c w f\.� /0 2 , and use it for Knox instead. City will pay for .� Summit). • vim. Current Status To Do Edison Undergounding At Jan 10, 2002 Developers meeting with Frank Shuma, KB Homes, Lewis Homes, Hall & Foreman, Madole Assoc. et al, it was decided we needed to underground Edison overhead lines on north side of Summit between Lytle Creek and Citrus. We need proof of prior rights first. Joanna Futerman reports she is working with 5th Edison contact person to get prior rights documentation. High-end estimate per Edison quoted figures was$1.4 million (about$30 per foot). It may take Edison alone some 35 weeks to undergound. Telephone must also be undergrounded. Letter sent to SCE on Feb 12, 2002 which says • Joanna Futerman is the point of contact with since SCE did not produce evidence of prior Edison. rights, they are to prepare a cost to relocate and then apply it to the cost of undergrounding. Edison replied there is no mechanism to transfer this money under PUC rules. So City must pay entire cost of undergrounding. If the City changes the ordinance regarding undergrounding, they can get the developers to reimburse the city since the city is paying for the undergrounding first. It appears that Edison undergrounding and/or perhaps Madoleordinance. 9 g p P Modify undergrounding completion of box culvert storm drain could drive project timeline. Completion of R/W legals might impact the schedule also, but Kim Reed can work fast once City Council approves condemnation if necessary. Current Status To Do Storm Drain Box Culvert Madole and Assoc. was retained by Developers to design approx. 9 X 10 ft box culvert in Summit Ave. from west of Beech to Sierra Ave, thence • Hold periodic coordination meetings. north on Sierra Ave. Includes crossing under I- 15. Proposed sewer line on north side of Summit needs design of box culvert alignment completed for H & F to finish sewer design parallel to storm drain. The lead for Madole for design is Aaron Skeers or Mark Bertone. City and Developer Meeting/CFD Held meeting with representatives of Lewis Homes, KB Homes (KB bought Lewis), Frank Shuma, and others recorded in Jan 10, 2002 minutes of meeting by H & F. Issues discussed were 1) Reduce width requirement for Developers for pavement section from 36 to 28 ft wide on south side along KB Sierra Lakes Summit Ave frontage (from Citrus to Pinehurst). This is because if the street had no raised median, the �1 r Developer would have paved %2 of Georgediscus ed with Yousef Patanwal He roadway + 12' = 36'. Since City is putting suggdetmg W# ltjne in a median, the Developer is now only Lr . putting in 28' (eastbound pavement). So they're putting in 8' less, and this savings should be credited to the City. Todd Miller said at PTM Meetin •on March 14 G g gorge to speak to Todd forMclariticat�on there will be no"swap". 2) Waive temporary overlay on Summit Ave between Lytle Creek and Citrus due to completion of Rt. 210 in vicinity. KB was going to put in a 1 %2" overlay approx. 36' wide over the existing street. Since City is now totally reconstructing Summit, the overlay would be throwaway. City requests trade off payment for savings in reduced width and overlay waiver so City can use equivalent funds on City project. Developers asked if CFD in turn could reimburse them for all or part these capital project costs. Project status.doc ':B8- FONTANA HERALD NEWS Thursday, May 9, 2002 • • Public Notice Advertising •ProtectsYour RightTo Know C, io �N��N� PUBL/C NOTICES Protects Your Binh;*- r, NOTICE OF PETITION TO Code 17913) I am also Record upon filing.Signa- NOTICE: This fictitious state of a fictitious business oral,state,or common law. CONSTRUCTION OF 835 a Avenue BY ORDER OF CITY OF ADMINISTER ESTATE OF aware that all information ture/s: Oscar C Escobar. name statement expires five name in violation of the (See Section 14400, ET ana,CA 92335 FONTANA DOROTHY E.KING on this statement be- This statement was filed with years from the date it was rights of another underfed- SEQ.,Business and Profes- SAN SEVAINE CREEK 909)350-7610 Case No.SPRSSO4720 comes Public Record the County Clerk of San Ber- filed in the office of the eral,state,or common law sions Code). BIKE AND RECRE- Publish: May 2,9,2002 Dated this 29th day of To all heirs, beneficiaries, upon filing. Signature/s: nardino County on 04/24/ County Clerk. A new ficti- (See Section 14400, ET Publish: May 2, 9, 16,23, ATIONAL TRAIL FRO. P.O.#02-0B003 ' April, 2002. creditors, contingent credi- ABBAS MADADIFAR.This 2002. I hereby certify that tious business name state- SEQ.,Business and Profes- 2002 FOOTHILL BOULEV• D tors,and persons,who may statement was filed with the this.copy is a correct copy ment must be filed before sions Code). TO PACIFIC ELECT IC NOTICE INVITING CITY OF FONTANA otherwise be interested in County Clerk of San Bernar- of the original statement on that time. The filing of this Publish: May 2, 9, 16,23, FICTITIOUS BUSINESS RAILROAD SEALED BIDS FOR 8353 Sierra Avenue the will or estate,or both,of dino County on 04/23/2002. file in my office.San Bernar- statement does not of itself 2002 NAME STATEMENT CONSTRUCTION OF Fontana,CA 92335 DOROTHY E.KING I hereby certify that this copy dino County Clerk By: s/ authorize the use in this FBN#2002-05539 BID NO.SB-4 '2 (909)350-6792 A PETITION FOR PRO- is a correct copy of the origi- CARLA MIMS/Deputy. state of a fictitious business FICTITIOUS BUSINESS The following person(s) is SOUTH HIGHLAND Publish: May 2,9,2002 BATE has been filed by Alice nal statement on file in my NOTICE: This fictitious name in violation of the NAME STATEMENT (are) doing business as: PUBLIC NOT E IS AVENUE AND JUNIPER P.O.#02-0B003 F. Philpot in the Superior office. San Bernardino name statement expires five rights of another under fed- FBN#2002-05494 BTE FUEL STOP, 10002 HEREBY GIVE that the AVENUE Court of California, County County Clerk By:s/CARLA years from the date it was eral, state,or common law The following person(s) is ALMOND AVE, FONTANA, CITY OF FON ANA, as SEWER SYSTEM NOTICE OF of SAN BERNARDINO. MIMS/Deputy. filed in the office of the (See Section 14400, ET (are) doing business as: CA 92335. KHALED CITY,invites se. edbidsfor IMPROVEMENTS DISADVANTAGE THE PETITION FOR PRO- NOTICE: This fictitious County Clerk. A new ficti- SEQ.,Business and Profes- THE SPEED SHOP, 1302 OTHMAN,10002 ALMOND the above state, project and BUSINESS ENT:'- BATE requests that Alice F. name statement expires five tious business name state- . sions Code). MONTE VISTA AVE, STE AVE,FONTANA;CA92335. will receive su, bids in the BID NO.SP-46-02 PRISES(DBE)G e •LS • Philpot be appointed as per- years from the date it was ment must be filed before Publish: May 2, 9, 16,23, #4, UPLAND, CA 91786. This business is/was con- offices of the ity Clerk up AND RIGHTS OF• BLIC sonal representative to ad- . filed in the office of the that time. The filing of this 2002 Mailing Address:9449 YEW ducted by: An Individual. to the hour of 00pm on the PUBLIC NOTICE IS TO COMME minister the estate•of the. County Clerk. A new ficti- statement does not of itself ST, RANCHO Began Transacting Business 23rd day of ay,2002,at HEREBY GIVEN that the decedent. tious business name state- authorize the use in this FICTITIOUS BUSINESS . CUCAMONGA, CA 91730. on 04/30/2002. BY SIGN- which time t •y will be pub- CITY OF FONTANA, as NOTICE IS EREBY THE PETITION requests ment must be filed before state of a fictitious business NAME STATEMENT KENNETH P TICICH,9449 ING BELOW, I DECLARE licly opened •nd read aloud. CITY,invites sealed bids for GIVEN to the p ,lic that: authority to administer the that time. The filing of this name in violation of the FBN#2002-05347 YEW ST, RANCHO THAT ALL INFORMATION the above stated project and estate under the Indepen- statement does not of itself rights of another under fed- The following person(s) is CUCAMONGA, CA 91730. IN THIS STATEMENT IS The work f improvement will receive such bids in the 1.The Town of ucca Valley dent Administration of Es- authorize the use in this eral,state,or common law (are)doing business as:DI- JASON E MILLS,311 JULIA TRUE AND CORRECT. A consists . furnishing all, offices of the City Clerk up has heretofo adopted a tates Act:(This authority will state of a fictitiousibusiness (See Section 14400, ET RECT PERSONNEL,311 N. CT., UPLAND, CA 91784. registrant who declares as materials, •quipment,tools, to the-hour of 10:00 AM on major projec, DBE overall allow the personal represen- name in violation of the SEQ.,Business and Profes-' EUCLID AVE., ONTARIO, This business is/was con- true information,which he labor an. ncidentals as re- the 23rd day of May,2002, goal consist' g of utilizing tative to take many actions rights of another underfed- sions Code). CA 91762. DANIEL E. ducted by:A General Part- or she knows to be false, quired b he Plans,Specifi- at which time they will be disadvantag:•business en- without obtaining court ap- eral,state,or common law Publish: May 2, 9, 16,23, PONCE-RODRIGUEZ, nership.Began Transacting is guilty of a crime.(B&P cations. d Contract Docu- publicly opened and read terprises in :II aspects of prove!.Before taking certain (See Section 14400, ET 2002 1310 S. DIAMOND BAR Business on N/A.BY SIGN- Code 17913) I am also ments f• the above stated aloud. contracting .the maximum very important actions,how- SEQ.,Business and Profes- BLVD.#B,DIAMOND BAR, ING BELOW, I DECLARE aware that all information project. he general items of • extent fees'.le and commit- ever,the personal represen- sions Code). FICTITIOUS BUSINESS CA 91765.This business is/ THAT ALL INFORMATION on this statement be- work t. .e done hereunder The work of improvement ting itself t. substantially in- tativewillberequiredtogive Publish: May 2,9, 16,23, NAME STATEMENT was conducted by:An Indi IN THIS STATEMENT IS comes Public Record consis .f the construction of consists of furnishing all creasing .isadvantaged notice to interested persons 2002 • FBN#2002-05288 vidual. Began Transacting TRUE AND CORRECT.A upon filing. Signature/s: clean ;&grubbing,survey- materials,equipment,tools, business nterprise utilize-. unless they have waived The following person(s) is Business on 04/25/2002.BY registrant who declares as KHALED OTHMAN This ing/st- ing,asphalt and con- labor and incidentals as re- tion.The goals further in- notice or consented to the FICTITIOUS BUSINESS (are) doing business as: SIGNING BELOW, I,DE- true information,which he statement was filed with the crete saving,asphalt slurry quired by the Plans,Specifi- clude ens ring thattheTown proposed action.)The inde- NAME STATEMENT ESCOBAR TRUCKING, CLARE THAT ALL INFOR- or she knows to be false, CountyClerk of San Bernar- seali'., chain-link fencing, cations and Contract Docu- of Yucca alley,and its con- pendent administration au- FBN#2002-05222 8144 CYPRESS AVE, MATION IN THIS STATE- is guilty of a crime.(B&P dino County on 04/30/2002. con• ete curb and gutter, ments for the above stated tractors- d subcontractors, thority will be granted unless The following person(s) is FONTANA,CA 92335.OS- MENT IS TRUE AND COR- Code 17913) I am also I hereby certify that this copy sign g and striping, land- project.The general items of which ar= recipients of Fed- an interested person files an (are) doing business as: CAR C ESCOBAR, 8144 RECT. A registrant who aware that all information is a correct copyoftheorigi- sca - irrigation, landscape work to be done hereunder eral-Aid unds, agrees to objection to the petition and ACCELERATED RE- CYPRESS AVE,FONTANA, declares as true informa- on this statement be- nal statement on file in my pla, ing and 90-day mainte- consist of the construction of provide di advantaged busi shows good cause why the SOURCE MANAGEMENT CA92335.This business is/ tion, which he or she comes Public Record office. San Bernardino na e. clearing & grubbing, con- ness ent rprises with the court should not grant the SERVICES(ARMS),14143 was conducted by:An Indi- knows to be false,is guilty upon filing. Signature/s: CountyClerk By:s/MARGIE struction of approximately maximum .pportunityto par- authority. SHEPHERD DRIVE, vidual. Began Transacting of a crime. (B&P Code Kenneth Ticich.This state- HUNT/Deputy. C..ies of Plans,Specifics- 4,800 LF of 10-inch vitrified ticipate i .he performance A HEARING on the petition RANCHO CUCAMONGA, Businesson04/24/2002.BY 17913)1 am also aware that ment was filed with the NOTICE: This fictitious ti. s, and Contract Docu- clay sewer pipe,manholes,' of contra is and subcon- will be held on June 14,2002 CA 91739.LINDEL FIELDS, SIGNING BELOW, I DE- all information on this County Clerk of San Bernar- name statement expires five nts are available from the and associated trench exca- tracts and •take all reason- at 8:30 AM in Dept.No.S17 14143 SHEPHERD DRIVE, CLARE THAT ALL INFOR- statement becomes Public dino County bn 04/29/2002. years from the date it was • y of Fontana(City),at vation/recompaction, and able ste. in accordance located at351 N.Arrowhead RANCHO CUCAMONGA, MATION IN THIS STATE- Record upon filing.Signa- I hereby certify that this copy filed in the office of the ::53 Sierra Avenue, pavement removal/restora- with 49 • R 26 to ensure. Ave. San Bernardino, CA CA 91739. DWAYNE MENT IS TRUE AND COR- ture/s: Daniel Ponce- is a correct copy oftheorigi- County Clerk. A new ficti- ••ntana,California 92335, tion. thatdisad .ntagedbusiness 92415. FIELDS, 141432 RECT. A registrant who Rodriguez. This statement rial statement on file in my tious business name state- :09)350-7610, upon pay- enterpris: have'the maxi- IF YOU OBJECT to the SHEPHARD • DRIVE, declares as true informa- was filed with'the County office. Sari Bernardino ment must be filed before ent of a Thirty-five Dol- Copies of Plans,Specifics- mumopp• unity to compete granting of the petition,you RANCHO CUCAMONGA, tion, which he or she Clerk of San Bernardino County Clerk By:s/HELEN that time. The filing of this ars ($35.00) non-refund- tions, and Contract Docu- and perfo contracts. should appear at the hear- CA 91739.This business is/ knows to be false,is guilty County on 04/25/2002. I NUNN/Deputy. statement does not of itself :ble fee($45.00 if mailed). ments are available from the ' ing and state your objections was conducted by:Husband of a crime. (B&P Code hereby certify that this copy NOTICE: This fictitious authorize the use in this Any questions pertaining to City of Fontana(City),at 2.The To of Yucca Valley or file written objections with &Wife. Began Transacting 17913)1 am also aware that is a correct copy of the origi- name statement expires five state of a fictitious business this project should be di- 8353. Sierra Avenue, has set t • annual goal at the court before the hearing. Business on N/A.BY SIGN- all information on this nal statement on file in my, years from the date it was name in violation of the rected to Leticia Ortiz at Fontana,California 92335, 4.5% for .articipation in Your appearance may be in ING BELOW, I DECLARE statement becomes Public office. San Bernardino filed in th'e office of the rights of another under fed- (909)350-6501. (909)350-6792, upon pay- projects eceiving U.S. person or by your attorney. THAT ALL INFORMATION Record upon filing.Signs- County Clerk By:s/MARGIE County Clerk. A new ficti- eral,state,or common law ment of a Thirty-five Dol- Deparat •nt of Transporta- IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR IN THIS STATEMENT IS ,ture/s: Oscar C Escobar. HUNT/Deputy. tious business name state- (See Section 14400, ET Proposals must be accom- lars ($35.00) non-refund- tion fund• by DBE contrac- or a contingent creditor of TRUE AND CORRECT.A This statement was filed with NOTICE: This fictitious ment must be filed before SEQ.,Business and Profes- panied by a proposal guar- able fee($45.00 if mailed). tors for t - period of Octo- the deceased;you must file registrant who declares as the County Clerk of San Ber- name statement expires five that time. The filing of this sions Code). antee in the form of cash, Any questions pertaining to ber 1,201 through Septem- your claim with the court and true information,which he nardino County on 04/24/ years from the date it was statement does not of itself Publish: May 2, 9, 16,23 cashier's check,a certified this project should be di- ber 30,2 $2. mail a copy to the personal or she knows to be false, 2002. I hereby certify that filed in the office of the authorize the use in this 2002 check or bid bond available rected toGeorge Harvilla, representative appointed by is guilty of a crime.(B&P this copy is a correct copy County Clerk. A new ficti- state of a fictitious business to the CITY in the amount of P.E.at(909)427-9166. 3.The . blic may inspect the court within four months Code 17913) I am also of the original statement on tious business name state- name in violation of the FICTITIOUS BUSINESS at least ten-percent(10%)of the goal-:nd a description from the date of first issu- aware that all information file in my office.San Bernar- ment must be filed before rights of another under fed- NAME STATEMENT the total amount bid. Any Proposals must be accom- of how t y were set at the once of letters as provided on this statement be- dino County Clerk By: s/ that time. The filing of this eral,state,or common law FBN#2002-05554 proposal not accompanied panied by a proposal guar- Commu ty Development in Probate Code Section comes Public Record CARLA MIMS/Deputy. statement does not of itself (See Section 14400, ET The following person(s) . by such a guarantee will not antee in the form of cash, Departm: t of the Town of 9100. The time for.filing upon filing. Signature/s: NOTICE: This fictitious authorize the use in this SEQ.,Business and Profes- (are) doing business a : be considered. A payment cashier's check,a certified Yucca Iley, located at claims will not expire before Linde!Fields.This statement name statement expires five state of a fictitious business sions Code). ONE STOP AUTO REC - bond and a performance check or bid bond available 58928 : siness Center four months from the hear- was filed with the County years from the date it was name in violation of the Publish: May 2,9, 16,23, CLERS, 10757 CHER• bond, each in an amount to the CITY in the amount of Drive,Yu- a Valley,Califor- ing date noticed above. Clerk of San Bernardino filed in the office of the rights of another under fed- 2002 AVE,FONTANA,CA923 '. equal to 100%of the total at least ten-percent(10%)of nia,for a •eriod of forty-five . YOU MAY EXAMINE the file County on 04/23/2002. I County Clerk. A new ficti- eral,state,or common law Mailing Address: 116 0 contract amount, shall be the total amount bid. Any (45)day• rom the date that kept by the court.If you are hereby certify that this copy tious business name state- (See Section 14400, ET FICTITIOUS BUSINESS KILLIMORE AV , required concurrently with proposal.not accompanied this notic is first published. a person interested in the is a correct copy of the origi- ment must be filed before SEQ.,Business and Profes- NAME STATEMENT NORTHRIDGE, CA 913.•. the execution of the contract by such a guarantee will not estate,you may file with the nal statement on file in my that time. The filing of this, sions Code). FBN#2002-05495 SARKIS S OKJIAN, 11. 0 and shall be in the form set be considered. A payment 4.The S. Department of court a Request for Special. office. San Bernardino statement does not of itself Publish: May 2, 9, 16,23, The following person(s) is KILLIMORE A , forth in the contract docu- bond and a performance Transpo :tionandtheTown • Notice(form DE-154)of the County Clerk By:s/CARLA authorize the use in this- 2002 (are) doing business as: NORTHRIDGE, CA 913... ments. bond, each in an amount of Yucc- alley will accept. filing of an inventory and MIMS/Deputy. state of a fictitious business BARAJAS FAMILY CHILD This business is/was c. - equal td 100%of the total commen .on the said goal appraisal of estate assets or NOTICE: This fictitious name in violation of the FICTITIOUS BUSINESS CARE, 7339 KAMLOOPS ducted by:An Individual r•- Any contract entered into contract amount, shall be for forty-' e(45)days from of any petition or account as name statement expires five rights of another under fed- NAME STATEMENT AVE,FONTANA,CA92336. gan Transacting Busin:.s pursuant to this notice will required concurrently with the date at this notice is provided in Probate Code years from the date it was eral,state,or common law FBN#2002-05362 IRMA BARAJAS, 7339 on N/A. BY SIGNING : - incorporate the provisions of the execution of the contract first publi• ed and said com- section 1250.A Request for filed in the office of the (See Section 14400, ET The following person(s) is KAMLOOPS AVE, LOW, I DECLARE TH T the State Labor Code.La- and shall be in the form set mentssh. I beconsideredto Special Notice form is avail- County,Clerk. A new ficti SEQ.,Business and Profes- (are) doing business.as: FONTANA, CA..92336.. ALL INFORMATION N bor Code Section 1735 re- forth in the contract docu- be for i .rmational pur able from thecourtclerk,,n'tious;business'parne.state- sions.Code). . - BEST CARPET STEAM- •JUAN.J BARAJAS,'7339.. THIS STATEMENT S . quires that no discrimination ments. - ,pose,sonl At(emey,fgr,pe,tittofier- r;r„Ir,meot,must,.pe:;filed,.before,• Publish: May 2,9; 16;23,- •ING,12031•WEEPING'WIL••1 KAMLOOPS ' ' AVE;•.-TRUE 6 AND`CORRECT A•' be made in the employment ' '` '" ''''''''N''"" " '-'' 41 ' "' MEGANARICNMONDESQ 6,thatrime, The,filing of this 2002: -1;s,.,,;• LOW LANE,FONTANA,CA•.. FONTANA,CA92336..Thisnu registrant who declare-:s:::of.persons upon public Any contract entered into 5.iii sad'• on to the forego CSBN170753 • statement does not of itself 92337. IHAB U EZAR, business is/was conducted true information,whic e works because of the race, pursuant to this notice will ing,inter sted minority and GARRISON & MCINNIS- authorize the use in this -._FICTITIOUS BUSINESS 12031 WEEPING WILLOW by:Husband&.Wife:Began- or she knows to be fal e,- religious creed,"color, na- incorporate the previsions of majority .ntractor organize- LLP state of a fictitious business NAME STATEMENT LANE, FONTANA, CA Transacting Business on 03/ is guilty of a crime.(B P tional origin,ancestry,physi- the State Labor Code.La- tions, u •n request, shall • 2650 CAMINO DEL RIO N name in violation of the FBN#2002-05322 92337.This business is/was 28/2002.BY SIGNING BE- Code 17913) 1 am al o cal handicap,medical con- bor Code Section 1735 re- receive , direct mailing'of . STE 108 rights of another under fed- The following person(s) is conducted by:An Individual. LOW, I DECLARE THAT aware that all informati n dition,marital status,or sex quires,that no discrimination the co .fete program.with SAN DIEGO CA 92108 , eral,state,or common law (are) doing business as: Began Transacting Business ALL INFORMATION IN on this statement - of such persons,except as be made in the employment a requ.• t that they provide . Fontana Herald. (See Section 14400, ET AGUILAR TRANSPORT, on N/A. BY SIGNING BE- THIS STATEMENT IS comes Public Reco d provided in Government of persons upon public written omments to the CN644403 BSC11744 May SEQ.,Business and Profes- 1030 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. LOW, I DECLARE THAT TRUE AND CORRECT.A upon filing. Signature .: Code Section 12940.Corn- works because of the'race, ' Town of ucca Valley onthis 2,9.16,2002 sions Code). PO 209, ONTARIO, CA , ALL INFORMATION IN registrant who declares as SARKIS SIMONE OKJI' . pliance with the prevailing religious creed, color, na- progra . ` Publish: May 2,9, 16,23, 91762. HUGO AGUILAR, THIS STATEMENT IS true information,which he This statement was filed h rates of wagesandappren- tional origin,ancestry,physi- "' FICTITIOUS BUSINESS 2002 1030 N. MOUNTAIN AVE TRUE AND CORRECT. A or she knows to be false, the County Clerk of SanB.•- ticeship Reemployment cal handicap,medical con- TOWN •FYUCCAVALLEY NAME STATEMENT PO 209, ONTARIO, CA registrant who declares as is guilty of a crime.(B&P nardino County on 04/ I/ standards established by the dition,marital status,or sex FBN#2002-05182 - FICTITIOUS BUSINESS ' 91762.This business is/was true information,which he Code 17913) I am also 2002. I hereby certify t :t State Director of Industrial of such persons,except as Janet .Anderson, Town The following person(s) is NAME STATEMENT conducted by:An Individual. or she knows to be false, aware that all information this copy is a correct co y Relations will be required. provided in Government Clerk (are) doing business as: FBN#2002-05274 Began Transacting Business is guilty of a crime.(B&P on this statement be- of the original statement n Code Section 12940.Com- AMERI AIR CONDITION- The following person(s) is on 04/27/2002. BY SIGN- Code 17913) I am also comes Public Record file in my office.San Bern. - Affirmative action to ensure pliance with the prevailing Dated 'pril 29,2002 '' ING & HEATING, 7642 (are) doing business as: ING BELOW, I DECLARE aware that all information upon filing. Signature/s: dino County Clerk By: ./ against discrimination in rates of wages and appren- KEMPSTER AVENUE, EMPIRE MEDIA GROUP, THAT ALL INFORMATION on this statement be- Irma Barajas.This statement HELEN NUNN/Deputy. employment practices on ticeship employment stan- Publis :May 2,9,2002 FONTANA,CA92336.Mail- 869 E. FOOTHILL BLVD. IN THIS STATEMENT IS comes Public Record- was filed with the County NOTICE: This fictitio s the basis of race,color,na- dards established by the ing Address:POST OFFICE SUITE N1, UPLAND, CA TRUE AND CORRECT.A upon filing. Signature/s: Clerk of San Bernardino name statementexpiresfi e tional origin, ancestry, sex, State Directoroflndustrial BOX 2242, FONTANA, CA 91786. Mailing Address: registrant who declares as IHAB EZAR.This statement County on 04/29/2002. I years from the date it s or religion will also be re-- Relations will be required. 92336. AMER! ENTER- 15051 GRANITE'PEAK true information,which he was filed with the County hereby certify that this copy filed in the office of t e quired. , PRISES CORPORATION, .AVE.,FONTANA,CA92336. or she knows to be false, Clerk of San Bernardino is a correct copy of the origi- County Clerk. A new fi i- Affirmative action to ensure I-lag Your 7642 KEMPSTERAVENUE, GEORGE L MARTIN,15051 is guilty of a crime.(B&P County on 04/25/2002. I nal statement on file in my tious business name st- -- The CITY hereby affirms- against discrimination in FONTANA,CA92336.This GRANITE PEAK AVE., Code 17913) I am also hereby certify that this copy office. San Bernardino merit must be filed bef re tively ensures that minority employment practices on • business is/was conducted FONTANA,CA 92336. This aware that all information is a correct copy of the origi- County Clerk By:s/MARGIE that time. The filing of is business enterprises will be the basis of race,color,na- by: A Corporation ... AI# business is/was conducted on this statement be- nal statement on file in my HUNT/Deputy. statement does not of it -If afforded full opportunity to tional origin,ancestry,sex, f RAItIOUS 2425228 State:CA.Began by: An Individual. Began comes Public Record office. San Bernardino NOTICE: This fictitious authorize the use in . is submit bids in response to or religion will also be re- • Transacting Business on N/ Transacting Business on N/ upon filing. Signature/s: County Clerk By:s/MARGIE name statement expires five state of a fictitious busin ss this notice and will not be quired. A.BY SIGNING BELOW,I A.BY SIGNING BELOW,I_ HUGO AGUILAR. This HUNT/Deputy. years from the date it was ' name in violation of e discriminated against on the J rustiness DECLARE THAT ALL IN- DECLARE THAT ALL IN- statement was filed with the NOTICE: This fictitious filed in the office of the rights of another under f d- basis of race,color,national The CITY hereby affirms- FORMATION IN THIS FORMATION IN THIS County Clerk of San Bernar- name statement expires five County Clerk. A new ficti- eral, state,or common w origin,ancestry,sex,or reli- tively ensures that minority • - STATEMENT IS TRUE AND STATEMENT IS TRUE AND dino County on 04/25/2002. years from the date it was tious business name state- (See Section 14400, T gion in any consideration business enterprises will be CORRECT. A registrant CORRECT. A registrant !hereby certify that this copy filed in the office of the merit must be filed before SEQ.,Business and Prof s- leading to the award of con- afforded full opportunity to Name who declares as true infor- who declares as true infor- is a correct copy of the origi- County Clerk. A new ficti- that time. The filing of this sions Code). tract. submit bids in response to mation, which he or she mation, which he or she nal statement on file in my tious business name state- statement does not of itself Publish: May 2,9, 16, c, this notice and will not be • knows to be false,is guilty knows to be false,is guilty office. San Bernardino merit must be filed before authorize the use in this 2002 The contract documents call discriminated against on the • of a crime. (B&P 'Code of a crime. (B&P Code County Clerk By:s/CARLA that time. The filing of this state of a fictitious business for monthly progress pay- basis of race,color,national : F xpI�t' '{i` • 17913)1 am also aware that 17913)I am also aware that MIMS/Deputy. statement does not of itself name in violation of the FICTITIOUS BUSINES' ments based upon the origin,ancestry,sex,orreli- ' • • . all information on this all information on this NOTICE: This fictitious authorize the use in this rights of another under fed- NAME STATEMENT . engineer's estimate of the gion in any consideration ' • statement becomes`Public statement becomes Public name statement expires five state of a fictitious business eral, state,or common law FBN#2002-05575 percentage of work corn- leading to the award of con- Record upon filing.Signa- Record upon filing.Signa- years from the date it was 'name in violation of the (See Section 14400, ET The following person(s) pleted. The CITY will retain tract. ture/s: ANTONIO ture/s: GEORGE L. MAR- filed in the office of the rights of another under fed- SEQ.,Business and Profes- (are) doing business a• 10 percent of each progress • SERRANO, PRESIDENT. TIN. This statement was County Clerk. A new ficti- eral, state, or common law sions Code). VALLEY ORNAMENTA payment as security for The contract documents call ' The This statement was filed with filed with the County Clerk of tious business name state- (See Section 14400, ET Publish: May 2, 9, 16,23, IRON, 1700 W. FOOTHIL completion of the balance of for monthly progress pay- • ' the County Clerk of San Ber-• San Bernardino'County on ment must be filed before SEQ.,Business and Profes-•, 2002 BLVD,UPLAND,CA 91786. the work.At the request and merits based upon the nardino County on 04/22/ 04/24/2002.I hereby certify that time. The filing of this sions Code). JOHN J ANDERSON,1700 expense of the successful engineer's estimate of the . , - 2002. I hereby certify'that that this copy is a correct statement does not of itself Publish: May 2, 9, 16,23, FICTITIOUS BUSINESS W. FOOTHILL BLVD, UP- bidder,the CITY will pay the percentage of work corn- B[,rs this copy is a correct copy copy of the original state- authorize the use in this 2002 NAME STATEMENT LAND, CA 91786. This amounts so retained upon pleted. The CITY will retain of the original statement on ment on file in my.office.San state af'a fictitious business FBN#2002-05521 business is/was conducted compliance with the require- 10 percent of each progress file in my office.San Bernar- Bernardino County Clerk By: name in violation of the FICTITIOUS BUSINESS The following person(s) is by: An Individual. Began merits of Public Contract payment as security for r dino County Clerk By: s/ s/CARLA MIMS/Deputy. rights of another under fed- NAME STATEMENT (are) doing business as: Transacting Business on 03/ Code Section 22300 and completion of the balance of � 1 MARGIE HUNT/Deputy, NOTICE: This fictitious eral,state, or common law FBN#2002-05362 • MAURICE PATTERSON 21/1971.BY SIGNING BE- the provisions of the contract the work.At the request and NOTICE: This fictitious name statement expires five (See Section 14400, ET The following person(s) is TRUCKING, 8088 OASIS LOW, I DECLARE THAT •ocuments pertaining to expense of the successful name statement expiresfive years from the date it was SEQ.,Business and Profes- (are) doing business as: STREET, FONTANA, CA .ALL INFORMATION IN .ubstitution of Securities. bidder,the CITY will pay the I years from the date it was filed in the office of the sions Code). BEST CARPET STEAM- 92336. MAURICE P THIS STATEMENT IS amounts so retained upon ) filed in the office of the County Clerk. A new ficti- Publish: May 2, 9, 16, 23, ING,12031 WEEPING WIL- PATTERSON,8088 OASIS TRUE AND CORRECT. A :ids must be prepared on compliance with the require- County Clerk. A new ficti- tious business name state- 2002 LOW LANE,FONTANA,CA STREET, FONTANA, CA registrant who declares as he City provided proposal ments of Public Contract tious business name state-. ment must be filed before 92337. IHAB U EZAR, 92336.This business is/was true information,which he .rms and r 'oletely filled Code Section 22300 and own merit must be filed before that time. The filing of this FICTITIOUS BUSINESS' 12031 WEEPING WILLOW conducted by:an Individual. or she knows to be false, ut in conf, ance with the the provisions of the contract that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself NAME STATEMENT LANE, FONTANA, CA Began Transacting Business is guilty of a crime.(B&P structions .Bidders and documents pertaining to statement does not of itself authorize the use in this • FBN#2002-05326 92337.This business is/was on 01/22/2002. BY SIGN- Code 17913) I am also . I proposal forms must be Substitution of Securities. authorize the use in this state'of a fictitious business The following person(s) is conducted by:An Individual. ING BELOW, I DECLARE aware that all information • bmitted in a sealed enve- ' state of a fictitious business name in violation of the (are) doing business as: Began Transacting Business THAT ALL INFORMATION on this statement be- I,.e plainly marked on the Bids must be prepared on name in violation of the rights of another under fed- AFFINITY GIFTS, 16050 on N/A. BY SIGNING BE- IN THIS STATEMENT IS comes Public Record • tside: "SEALED BID the City provided proposal I �`' � rights of another underfed- eral,state,or common law JACKSON DR, FONTANA, LOW, I DECLARE THAT TRUE AND CORRECT. A upon filing. Signature/s: •R CONSTRUCTION OF forms and completely filled eral,state,or common law (See Section 14400, ET • CA 92336.Mailing Address: ALL INFORMATION IN registrant who declares as JOHN ANDERSON. This S N SEVAINE CREEK out in conformance with the : IN argaiet (See Section 14400, ET SEQ.,Business and Profes- P.O,BOX 1363,FONTANA, THIS STATEMENT IS true information,which he statement was filed with the B E AND RECRE- Instructions to Bidders and i SEQ.,Business and Profes- sions Code). CA 92334.TONY JAMES TRUE AND CORRECT. A or she knows to be false, County Clerk of San Bernar- A ONAL TRAIL,BID NO. all proposal forms must be 1909 sions Code). Publish: May 2, 9, 16, 23, G EORG E, 16050 JACK- registrant who declares as is guilty of a crime..(B&P dino County on 04/30/2002. 'S: 41-02-DO NOT OPEN submitted in a sealed enve- ., Publish: May 2,9,.16,23, 2002 • SON DR., FONTANA, CA true information,which he Code 17913) I am also I hereby certify that this copy W H REGULAR MAIL". - lope plainly marked on the ....... .. T�._�. �_._.__ .. ..: • ., .. ,,,,* In• •'CFAI Grl run .ti A. w.w..I .- r • • • Thursday, May 9, 2002 FONTANA HERALD NEWS- E7' • Public Notice Advertising PUBLIC Public Notice Advertising • Protects Your Right To Know NOTICES Protects Your Right To.Know t NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S scribed above is purported tor attempting to collect a check drawn by a state or will increase this figure prior Office of the Recorder or to pay the remaining princi- Steven L.Butler and Nirma ARE IN DEFAULT UNUMH SALE to be:9135LiveOakAvenue debt.Any information ob- federal credit union, or a to sale. The beneficiaryun- SAN BERNARDINO pal sum of the note(s) se- P.Butler,husband and wife ADEEDOFTRUSTDATED ' TS No.02-01305 Loan No. • Fontana California 92335`40aned will be used for that check drawn by a state or der said Deed of Trust here- County,California,executed cured by said Deed of Trust, Will sell at public auction to 02/04/1998.UNLESS YOU ' • 4130441 Title Order No. The undersigned Trustee Purpose. . federal savings and loan as- tofore executed and deliv- by: ISMAEL FRANCO AND with interest thereon,as pro- highest;bidder for cash, TAKE ACTION TO PRO- '077021842Investor/Insurer disclaims any liability for any 2'0029073500449 sociation, savings associa- •ered to the undersigned a CAROLINA ALMA vided in said note(s), ad- cashier's . check/cash TECT YOUR PROPERTY, ,'No. 0480186696729 APN incorrectness of the street 05/02/02, 05/09/02, 05/16/ tion,or savings bank speci- written Declaration of De- FRANCO, HUSBAND AND vances, if any, under the equivalent or other form of IT MAY BE SOLDATAPUB- No.:0236 472 14 0 000 address and other common 02 fied in section 5102 of the fault and Demand for Sale, WIFE,AS JOINTTENANTS, terms of the Deed of Trust, payment authorized.by LIC SALE. IF YOU NEED ;':YOU ARE IN DEFAULT UN- designation, if any, shown CNS"383618# Financial Code and autho- and a written Notice of De- as Trustor, FEDERAL NA- estimated fees,charges and 2924h(b).(payable at time of AN EXPLANATION OFTHE DER.A DEED OF TRUST herein. Said sale will be FONTANA HERALD AND rized to do business in this fault and Election to Sell. TIONAL MORTGAGE AS- expenses of the Trustee and sale in lawful money of the NATURE OF THE PRO- DATED 06/04/97.UNLESS made,but without covenant• NEWS';: • state). At: AT THE EN- The undersigned caused SOCIATION,as Beneficiary. of the trusts created by said United States)At the Main CEEDING AGAINST YOU, YOU TAKE ACTION TO or warranty, expressed or TRANCE TO THE CITY said Notice of Default and WILL SELL AT PUBLIC Deed of Trust, to-wit: Entrance to the County YOUSHOULDCONTACTA PROTECT YOUR PROP- implied,regarding title,pos- NOTICE'.OF TRUSTEE'S HALL AT 303 E. "B" Election to Sell to be re- AUCTION TO THE HIGH- $105,163.17 (Estimated) .Courthouse,351 N. Arrow- LAWYER. On 05/23/2002 ERTY,IT MAY BE SOLD AT session,or encumbrances, SALE Trustee Sale No. STREET ONTARIO,CA,all corded in the county where EST BIDDER FOR CASH Accrued interest and addi- head Avenue, San Berner- AT 2:30 p;m. HOUSEKEY A PUBLIC SALE. IF YOU to pay the remaining princi- 02-00530` . Loan No. right,title and interest con- the real property is located (payable at time of sale in tional advances,it any,will ding CP)'P.'r'.'right, title and FINANCIAL CORPORA- NEED AN EXPLANATION pal sum of the note(s) se- 19329323 Title Order No. veyed to and now held by it' and more than three months lawful money of the United increase this figure prior to interest conveyed to and TION as the duly appointed OF THE NATURE OF THE cured by said Deed of Trust, 00675805 APN under said Deed of Trust in have elapsed since such re- States,by cash,a cashier's sale. The beneficiary under now held by it under said Trustee,under and pursuant PROCEEDING AGAINST with interest thereon,as pro- 0241-251-47-0-000 FHA # the property situated in said cordation. Date: 04/30/02, check drawn by a state or said Deed of Trust hereto- Deed of Trust in the property to Deed of Trust recorded on YOU,YOU SHOULD CON- vided in said note(s) ad 048-0316067703 YOU ARE County California describing ARM FINANCIAL CORPO- national bank, a check fore executed and delivered situated in said County and 02/20/1998, Instrument TACT A LAWYER Notice is vances, if any, under the IN DEFAULT UNDER A the land therein: "As more RATION,P.O. Box 85309, drawn by a state or federal to the undersigned a written State described as:As more 19980060735 of,official hereby given that CTC Real terms of said Deed of Trust, DEED OF TRUST DATED fully described on the above San Diego,CA 92186-5309, credit union, or a check Declaration of Default and fully described in the above records in the Office of the Estate Services FKA CTC .fees,charges and expenses 11/14/97. UNLESS YOU mentioned Deed of Trust", Sales Information(916)974- drawn by a state or federal Demand for Sale,and a writ- mentioned Deed of Trust Recorder of San Bernardino Foreclosure Services Cor- of the Trustee and of the TAKE ACTION TO PRO- The property heretofore de- 6099, General Information - savings and loan as- ten Notice of Default and APN# 0194-092-39 The County,California,executed poration,as duly appointed trusts created by said Deed TECT YOUR PROPERTY, scribed is being sold ias isi. (858) 689-9735 LISA sociation, savings associa- Election to Sell The under- street address and other by Jesus C.Ascencio and trustee pursuant to the Deed of Trust.The total amount of IT MAY BE SOLD ATA PUB- The street address and other LEWIS,ASSISTANT SEC- tion,or savings bank speci- signed caused said Notice of common designation,:if any, JuanaL.Ascencio,'husband of Trust executed by the unpaid balance of the LIC SALE. IF YOU NEED common designation,if any, RETARY NPP0094238 05/ fied in section 5102 of the Default and Election to Sell of the real property de- and wife as joint tenants as MARVIN J. BLANCO AND obligation secured by the AN EXPLANATION OF THE of the real property de- 02/02,05/09/02,05/16/02 Financial Code and autho- to be recorded in the county scribed above is purported Trustor,New Century Mort- REINA D. BLANCO, HUS- property to be sold and rea- NATURE OF THE PRO- scribed above is purported CNS-386417# rized to do business in this where the real property is to be:'9350 Acacia Avenue, gage Corporation,a Celifor- BAND AND WIFE AND sonable estimated costs, CEEDINGSAGAINST YOU, to be: 17075 PROSPECT FONTANA HERALD AND state). At: AT THE EN- located and more than three Fontana,'CA92335Theun- nia Corporation,as Benefi- SONIA E. LINARES, A expenses and advances at YOU SHOULD CONTACTA AVENUE, FONTANA, CA NEWS TRANCE TO THE CITY months have elapsed since dersignedTrusteedisclaims ciary.WILL SELL AT PUB- ' SINGLE WOMAN,ALL AS the time of the initial publi- LAWYER. On May 22, 92335. The undersigned HALL AT 303 E. "B" such recordation. Date:05/ any liability forany incorrect- LIC AUCTION TO THE • JOINT TENANTS dated 06/ cation of the Notice of Sale 2002,at 11 i30 AM,ARM FI- Trustee disclaims any liabil- NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S• STREET ONTARIO,CA.,all 02/02, ARM FINANCIAL ness of the street address HIGHEST BIDDER FOR 04/97 and recorded 06/16/ is:$106,730.30 NANCIAL CORPORATION ity for any incorrectness of SALE Trusted Sale No. right,title and interest con- CORPORATION, P.O. Box and other common designa- CASH (payable at time of 97,as InstrumentNo,1997- The beneficiary under said as the duly appointed the street address and other 02-00642 Loan No. veyed to and now held by it 85309, San Diego, CA tion, if any, shown herein. sale in lawful money of the 212137,of Official Records Deed of Trust heretofore.ex- Trustee under and pursuant common designation,if any, 64191665 Title Order No. under said Deed of Trust in 92186-5309,Sales hforma- Said'sale will be made;but United States, by cash, a in the office of the County ecuted and delivered to the to Deed of Trust recorded on shown herein. Said sale will 1066210 APN 0193-495-49 the property situated in said tion (916) 974-6099, Gen- without covenant or war- cashiers check drawn by a Recorder of San Bernardino undersigned a written Dec- 12/02/97 Instrument be made, but without coy- VA#0000003079622 YOU County,California,describ- eral Information(858)689- rarity,expressed or implied, state or national bank, a County,'State of California, laration of Default and De- 19970443118,Book,Page enant or warranty, ex- ARE IN DEFAULT UNDER ing the land therein: "As 9735 ROBERT regarding title, possession, check drawn by a state or will sell on 05/23/02 at mand for Sale,and a written of Official Records in?the pressed or implied,regard- ADEEDOFTRUSTDATED more fully described on the OBSTARCZYK, ASSIS- or encumbrances,to pay the federal credit union, or a 12:00PM,AT THENORTH Notice of Default and Elec- Office of the Recorder,of ing title,possession,or en- 02/18/99. UNLESS YOU above mentioned Deed of TANT SECRETARY remaining principal sum of check drawn by a state or ARROWHEAD AVENUE tion to Sell.The undersigned SAN BERNARDINO cumbrances,to pay the re- TAKE ACTION TO PRO- Trust": The property here- NPP0094356 05/02/02,05/ the note(s)secured by said federal savings and loan as- ENTRANCE TO THE caused said Notice of De- County,California,executed maining principal sum of the TECT YOUR PROPERTY, tofore described is being 09/02,05/16/02 Deed of Trust,with interest sociation, savings associa- COUNTY COURTHOUSE, fault and Election to Sell to by:`CARLOS E.BONILLA, note(s) secured by said IT MAY BE SOLD AT PUB- sold'as is'. The street ad- CNS-387484# thereon,as provided in said tion,'or savings bank speci- 351 NORTH ARROWHEAD be recorded in the county A SINGLE MAN AND Deed of Trust,with interest LIC SALE. IF YOU NEED dress and other common FONTANA HERALD AND note(s), advances, if any, tied in section•'5102 of the AVENUE, SAN BERNAR- where the real property is MICHAEL EDWARD thereon,as provided in said AN EXPLANATION OF.THE designation, if any, of the NEWS under the terms of said Deed Financial Code and autho- DINO,CA at public,auction, located. LYONS,A SINGLE MAN,as note(s), advances, if any, NATURE OF.THE PRO- real property described of Trust,fees• ;charges'and rized to do business in this to the highest bidder for cash Date: May 1, 2002 First Trustor, MORTGAGE under the terms of the Deed CEEDINGS AGAINST YOU, above is purported to be: NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S expenses of the Trustee and state).At the main entrance or check as described below; American Lenders Advan- ELECTRONIC REGISTRA of Trust, estimated fees, YOU SHOULD CONTACTA 11807 PUERTO REAL SALE TS No.: of the trusts created by said to the County Courthouse payable in full attimeofsale, tage, LoneStar Mortgagee TION'SYSTEMS, INC., as charges and expenses of the LAWYER. On May 22, ROAD„ FONTANA, CA 20029073500491 Loan No.: Deed of Trust. The total 351 North Arrowhead, San all right, title, and interest Services, L.L.C., 3 First Beneficiary. WILL SELL AT Trustee and of the trusts cre- 2002,at 11:30 AM,ARM Fl- 92337. The undersigned 1956368861 FHA/VA/MI amount of the unpaid bal- Bernardino,'CA, all right, conveyed to and w held American Way,Santa Ana, PUBLIC AUCTION TO THE'• ated by said Deed of Trust, NANCIAL CORPORATION Trustee disclaims any liabil- Na:048-1666464.YOU ARE ance of the obligation se- title and interest conveyed to by it.under saideed of CA 92707 Ricardo Juarez HIGHEST BIDDER FOR tonwit: $103,583.87 (Esti- as the duly appointed ity for any incorrectness of IN DEFAULT UNDER A cured by the property to be and now held byitundersaid Trust, in the property situ- For Trustee's Sale informa- CASH (payable at time of mated)Accrued interest and Trustee under and pursuant the street address and other DEED OF TRUST DATED sold and reasonable esti- Deed of Trust in the property ated in said County and Lion please call 916-387- sale in lawful money of the additional advances,if any, to Deed of Trust recorded on common designation,if any, 06/21/1999 UNLESS YOU mated costs,expenses and situated in said'County,Cali- State and as more fully de- 7728 LoneStar Mortgagee United States, by cash, a will increase this figure prior 02/26/99 Instrument shown herein. Said sale will TAKE ACTION TO PRO advances at the time of the fornia describing the land scribed in the above refer- Services,L.L.C.15000 Sur- cashier's check drawn by a to sale. The beneficiary un- 19990083307, Book, Page be made, but without coy- TECT YOUR PROPERTY, initial publication of the No- therein:AS MORE FULLY ended Deed of Trust. The 'veyor Boulevard,Suite 250, state or national bank, a der said Deed of Trust here- of Official Records in the en ant or warranty, ex- IT MAY BE SOLDATA PUB- tide of Sale is:$91,635.51 DESCRIBED IN THE street address and other Addison, Texas 75001. check drawn by a state or tofore executed and deliv- Office of the Recorder of pressed or implied,regard- LIC SALE. IF YOU NEED The beneficiary under said ABOVE MENTIONED common designation,if any, LoneStar Mortgagee Ser- federal credit union, or a ered to the undersigned a SAN BERNARDINO ing title,possession,or en- AN EXPLANATION OF THE Deed of Trust heretofore ex- DEED OF TRUST The of the real property de- vices,L.L.C.isa debt collec- check drawn by a state or written Declaration of De- County,California,executed cumbrances,to pay the re- NATURE OF THE PRO- ecuted and delivered to the property heretofore de- scribed above is purported tor attempting to collect a federal savings and loan as- fault and Demand for Sale, by: MANUEL JOSEPH maining principal sum of the CEEDINGSAGAINST YOU, undersigned a written Dec- scribed is being sold'as is'. to be: 14452 EL debt.Any information ob- sociation, savings associa- and a written Notice of De- GARCIA AND JENNIFER note(s) secured by said YOUSHOULDCONTACTA laration of Default and De- The street address and other CONTENTO AVENUE, tained will be used for that tion,or savings bank speci- fault and Election to Sell. JERI GARCIA, HUSBAND Deed of Trust,with interest LAWYER.On 05/.23/2002 at mand for Sale and a written common designation,if any, • FONTANA,CA,92337 The _ purpose. fied in section 5102 of the The undersigned caused AND WIFE, as Trustor, thereon,as provided in said 10:00 A.M.,LoneStar Mort- Notice of Default and Elec- of the real property,de undersigned Trustee dis- 20029073500396. Financial Code and autho- said Notice of Default and WASHINGTON MUTUAL note(s), advances, if any, gagee Services, L.L.C.,as tion to Sell.The undersigned scribed above is purported ' claims any liability for any 05/02/02,05/09/02,05/16/ rized to do business in this Election to Sell to be're- HOME LOANS, INC,SUC- under the terms of the Deed duly appointed Trustee un- caused said Notice of De- to`be:'8818 South Nuevo incorrectness of.the street 02 state). At: AT THE EN- corded in the county where CESSOR IN INTEREST BY of Trust, estimated fees, der and pursuant to Deed of fault and Election to Sell to Avenue,Fontana,CA92335 address and other common CNS-383571# TRANCE TO THE CITY the,realproperty is located MERGER TO FLEET charges and expenses of the Trust recorded 06/29/1999, be recorded in the county The undersigned Trustee designation, if any,'shown FONTANA HERALD•AND HALL AT 303 E. "B" and more than three months MORTGAGE CORP., as Trustee and of the trusts cre- as Instrument No. where the real property is disclaims any liability for any, ' herein.The total amount of NEWS STREET ONTARIO,CA:,all have elapsed since such re- Beneficiary. WILL SELL AT ated by said Deed of Trust, 19990274665, of Official located. LoneStar Mort- incorrectness of the street the unpaid balance"with in- right,title and interest con- cordation. Date: 04/30/02, PUBLIC AUCTION TO THE to-wit: $109,574.52 (Esti- Records in the office of the gagee Services,L.L.C.is a and other common designa- terest thereon of the oblige- NOTICE OF TRUSTEES veyed to and now held by it ARM FINANCIAL CORPO- HIGHEST BIDDER FOR mated)Accrued interest and County Recorder of San debt collector attempting to tion,.if any; shown herein. tion secured by the property SALE under said Deed of Trust in RATION, P.O. Box 85309, CASH (payable at time of additional advances,if any, Bernardino County,State of collect a debt.Any informa- Said.sale will be made,but to be sold plus reasonable TS No.: 20029073500449 the property situated in said San Diego,CA 92186-5309, sale in lawful money of the will increase this figure prior California, Executed by tion obtained will be used for without covenant or war- estimated costs, expenses Loan No.'1506750082 FHA/ County,California describing Sales Information(916)974- United States, by cash, a to sale. The beneficiary un- Susana Dorantes, a single that purpose: Date:05/02/ ranty,expressed or implied, and advances at the;time of VA/MI No.:048-1148528 the land therein: "As more 6099, General Information cashier's check drawn by a der said Deed of Trust here- woman Will sell at public 2002 First American Lend- regarding title, possession,• the initial publication of the YOU ARE IN DEFAULT UN- fully described on the above •(858) 689-9735 ROBERT state or national bank, a tofore executed and deliv- auction to highest bidder for ers Advantage, LoneStar or encumbrances,to pay the Notice of Sale is$102745.15 DER A DEED OF TRUST mentioned Deed of Trust". OBSTARCZYK, ASS IS- check drawn by a state or ered to the undersigned a cash,cashier's.check/cash Mortgagee Services,L.!-.C., remaining,principal sum of It is possible that at the time DATED SEPTEMBER 22, The property heretofore de.: TANT SECRETARY federal credit union,or a written Declaration of De- equivalent or other form of 3 FirstAmerican Way,Santa the note(s)secured by said ,of sale the opening bid may 1998 UNLESS YOU TAKE scribed is being sold'as is'. NPP0094152 05/02/02,05/ check drawn by state or fault and Demand for Sale, payment authorized by Ana, CA 92707 Ricardo Deed Of Trust,with interest be less than the total indent- ACTION TO PROTECT The street address and other 09/02,05/16/02 federal savings and loan as- and a written Notice of De- 2924h(b).(payable at time of JuarezAuthorized Signature thereon,as provided in said 'edness due. In addition to YOUR PROPERTY,IT MAY common designation,if any, 05/02/02, 05/09/02, 05/16/ sociation, savings associa- fault and Election to Sell. sale in lawful money of the For Trustee's Sale informa- note(s) advances, if any, cash,the Trustee will accept BE SOLD AT A PUBLIC of the real property de- 02 • tion,or savings bank speci- The undersigned caused United States)At the Main tion please call 925-603- •under the terms of said Deed cashier's checks drawn on a SALE. IF YOU NEED AN scribed above is purported CNS-386402# fied in section 5102 of the said Notice of Default and Entrance to the County 7342 RSVP#38770 05/02/. 6f.Trust, estimated fees; state or national bank, a EXPLANATION OF THEM to be:. t7395.jMANGO,AV- FONTANA HERALD••AND Financial Code and h - El ction)o SpII,to be•,r..,, Cp rjhouse'351,N rro ; 02 05/ 9/02 Q5/16/02 charges n e nsesofthe check d awn by a state or NAT,ii49,itYP,IYITE'P IC1- E' 'U ONT,aiN '''dW IJE g'sn H .ri..l- :•J rized to do bus. e�i � i : , hr' , . , h et.. ad-A l:, f 1 . -''".1')`.�" ,'M. „ ,',er+ , . PAS i ',T 'n �r-c� l .: ... . : <<• ,.+�_ . , ,.. �-: •Ii f etl + . - ... ti. u I '. � W 4 .�:wYF „L-,_c.: ...:. ....: . . .to, in s�,n,.his, co�do'ci'in the1bouT�ty�whre heed P,�en>; Sa Be�naf _, > s fi�IrUste����o`��hetru�ts'vtfe-, . feiara) c4§it union, d .'6 c ' }5I�ic�t' A Nt`" d.t3„ f d0,(!tie,uhdg�s� 0 ,. s�taPei, t:a"A1-TNk"or- t1ie,.real ert is too di o C . r i>. � Gay :� ��..+,,,;�,,, ,�A,� �� f-P,,y 2 ,n. �.A1 a h�ti�.,ya a r�,e�i �� �' a d� ��d<h�g��:b€ ��' ,,O,,.: " ri rioli i d ,e c i,C„n,eye "tO :J :�.J"°f tS ,�'t ""'r;,.;•;'m o. it.y�.. . : :r(Oil. check drawn by a stag or Y.OUSH, ULD'C,ONfACTA; Trusteedisclalrtsany.liabil; NOT�Gt�..Oi'IFiUSTEEl IFiAN ';T IrHE,CITY, arid;rnotthanthreemonths, irtiterest,Conveyect to ar�td G4L� fort!$41,�215.05t �11- federal savings and loan as- LAWYER. ity for any incorrectness of SALE Trustee Sale No. HALL AT 303 E. "B" have elapsed since such now held by it under said T.S.No-GM-60331-C mated)Accrued interest and sociation, savings associa- On May 23, 2002 at the street address and other 02-00535 Loan No. STREET ONTARIO,CA,all recordation. Date: 05/02/ Deed of Trust in the property Loan No.010487320 additional advances,if any, tion,or savings bank?speci- 12:OOPM, LoneStar Mort- common designation,if any, 400079176 Title Order No. right,title and interest con- 02,ARM FINANCIAL COR- situated in said County and YOU ARE IN DEFAULT UN- will increase this figure prior fied in Section 5102 of the gagee Services, L.L.C., as shown herein. Said sale will APN 0228-791-51 FHA # veyed to and now held by it PORATION, P.O. Box State described as:As more DER A DEED OF TRUST to sale.The beneficiary un- Financial Code and autho- duly appointed Trustee un- be made, but without coy- 0481954855703 YOU ARE under said Deed of Trust in 85309, San Diego, CA fully described in above DATED 3/4/97. .UNLESS der said Deed of Trust,here- • rized to do business in this der and pursuant to Deed of enant or warranty, ex- IN DEFAULT UNDER A the property situated in said 92186-5309,SalesIforma- mentioned Deed of Trust YOU TAKE ACTION TO tofore executed and deliv state Said sale will be made Trust recorded October 8, pressed or implied,regard- DEED OF TRUST DATED County,California describing tion (916) 974-6099, Gen- APN# 0192-203-16 The PROTECT YOUR PROP- ered,to the undersigned a in an'AS IS'condition, but 1998, as Instrument No. ing title,possession,or en- 05/07/99. UNLESS YOU the land therein: "As more eral Information(858)689- street address and other ERTY,IT MAY BE SOLD AT written Declaration of De- without covenant or'war- 199804287n, of Official cumbrances,to pay the re- TAKE ACTION TO PRO- fully described on the above 9735 ROBERT common designation,if any, A PUBLIC SALE. IF YOU fault and Demand for,Sale, ranty, express or implied, Records in the office of the maining principal sum of the TECT YOUR PROPERTY mentioned Deed of Trust". OBSTARCZYK, ASSIS- of the real property de-' NEED AN EXPLANATION and written Notice of Default regarding title,possession or County Recorder of San note(s) secured by said ITMAYBESOLDATAPUB The property heretofore de- TANT SECRETARY scribed above is purported OF THE NATURE OF THE and Election to Sell. The encumbrances,to satisfy the Bernardino County,State of Deed of Trust,with interest LIC SALE. IF YOU NEED scribed is being sold'as is NPP0094365 05/02/02,05/ to be:17198 Anastasia Av- PROCEEDING AGAINST undersigned caused said indebtedness secured by California.Executed by Leon thereon,as provided in said AN EXPLANATION OF THE The street address and other 09/02,05/16/02 enue, Fontana,CA 92335- YOU,YOU SHOULD CON- Notice of Default and Elec- said Deed of Trust ad- C.Pierce,a married man as note(s), advances, if any, NATURE OF THE PRO- common designation,if any, CNS-386856 , 4826 The undersigned TACT LAWYER. tion to Sell to be recorded in vances thereunder with in- his sole and separate prop- under the terms of the Deed CEEDINGSAGAINSTYOU, of the real.property de- FONTANA HERALD AND Trustee disclaims any liabil- A public.auction sale to the the county where the real terest as provided,and the erty Will Sell at Public Auc- of Trust, estimated fees, YOU SHOULD CONTACTA scribed above is purported NEWS ity for any incorrectness of highest.,bidder for cash, property is located and more unpaid principal of the Note 'lion to,Highest Bidder for charges and expenses of the LAWYER. On May 22, to be: 11452 TROTTER the street address and other cashier's check drawn on a than three months have secured by said Deed of Cash,Cashier's check/Cash Trustee and of the trusts cre- 2002,at 11;30 AM,ARM Fl- LANE, FONTANA, CA NOTICE OF:TRUSTEE'S common designation,if any, state or national bank,check elapsed since such recorda- Trust with interest thereon as equivalent or other form of ated by said Deed of Trust, NANCIAL CORPORATION 92337. The undersigned SALE Trustee Sale No. shown herein:Said sale will drawn by a state or federal tion. DATE: 4/26/02 provided in said Note,plus payment authorized by to-wit: $137,280.09 (Esti- as the duly appointed Trustee disclaims any liabil- 02-00634 Loan No. be made, but without coy- credit union, or a check HOUSEKEY FINANCIAL fees,charges and expenses 2924h(b),(payable at time of mated)Accrued interest and Trustee under and pursuant ity for any incorrectness of 402163747 Title Order No, enant or warranty, ex drawn by a state or federal CORPORATION P.O. Box of the Trustee and of the sale in lawful money of the additional advances,if any, to Deed of Trust recorded on the street address and other 1065765 APN 0231-062-13 pressed or implied,regard- savings and loan associa- 640145 CITY OF INDUS-' trusts created by said Deed United States)At the North will increase this figure prior 05/19/99 Instrument common designation,if any, FHA#0482449653703 YOU ing title,possession,or en- tion,or savings association, TRY, CA91716=0145 For of Trust. Dated: 04/26/02 ArrowheadAvenue entrance to sale. The beneficiary un- 19990214413, Book, Page shown herein. Said sale will ARE IN DEFAULT UNDER cumbrances,to pay the re- or savings bank specified in Sale Information: 909-397- CTC Real Estate Services to the County Courthouse, der said Deed of Trust here- of Official Records in the be made, but without coy- A DEED OF TRUST DATED maining principal sum of the Section 5102 of the Finan 3047 Sherron R,Ferguson, FKA CTC Foreclosure Ser-, 351 North Arrowhead Av- tofore executed and deliv- Office:of the Recorder of enant or warranty, ex- 11/06/00. UNLESS YOU note(s) secured by said cial Code and authorized to Assistant ' 'Secretary vices Corporation, 5898 enue, San Bernardino, CA ered to the undersigned a SAN BERNARDINO pressed or implied, regard- TAKE ACTION TO PRO- Deed of Trust,with interest do business in this state,will TAC#477056BPUB:5/92,5/ Condor Dr., MP-88, All right, title and interest written Declaration of De- County California,executed ing title,possession,or en- TECT YOUR PROPERTY, thereon,as provided in said be held by the duly ap- 09,5/16 • Moorpark,CA 93021 Phone: conveyed to and now held fault and Demand for Sale, by: CONRAD BOEHM AND cumbrances,to pay the re- IT MAYBE SOLD AT PUB- note(s), advances, if any, pointed trustee.The sale will _ (800)281-8219,Sale infer- by it under said Deed of and a written Notice of De- MARIANNE JOSEPHINE mainingprincipalsumofthe LIC SALE. IF YOU NEED under the terms of said Deed be made, but without cov- mation(805)578-6618 By:/ Trust inihe property situated, fault and Election to Sell. BOEHM, HUSBAND AND note(s) secured by said AN EXPLANATION OF THE of Trust,fees,charges and ' enant or warranty, ex- S/Trustee Sale Officer in said County and State The undersigned caused WIFE; as Trustor, Deed of Trust,with interest NATURE OF THE PRO- expenses of the Trustee and pressed or implied,regard-, CTC Real Estate Services is described as:As more fully said Notice of Default and WASHINGTON MUTUAL thereon,as provided in said CEEDINGS AGAINST YOU, of the trusts created by said ing title,possession,or en- a debt collector attempting to described in the above men- Election to Sell to be re- HOME LOANS,INC.,SUC- note(s), advances, if any, YOU SHOULD CONTACTA Deed of Trust. The total cumbrances, to satisfy the collect a debt.Anyinforma- tioned Deed of Trust.APN# corded in the countywhere CESSOR IN INTEREST BY under the terms of the Deed LAWYER. On May 22, amount of the unpaid bal- obligation secured by said Has Your tion obtained will be used for 0191-031-64-0-00 the real property is located MERGER TO FLEET. of Trust, estimated fees, 2002,at 11:30 AM,ARM FI- ance of the obligation se- Deed of Trust.The Under- that purpose. The street address and other and more than three months MORTGAGE CORP, as charges and expenses of NANCIAL CORPORATION cured by the property to be signed Trustee disclaims • '05/02/02,05/09/02, 05/16% common designation,if any, have elapsed since such re- Beneficiary. WILL SELL AT the Trustee and of the trusts as the duly appointed sold and reasonable esti- any liability for any incorrect- Ft['t.itwtl1,1S I 02 of the real property de- cordation. Date: 04/30/02, PUBLIC AUCTION TO THE created by said Deed of Trustee under and pursuant mated costs,expenses and ness of the property address CNS-382023# scribed above is purported ARM FINANCIAL CORPO- HIGHEST BIDDER FOR Trust, to-wit: $161,315.51 to Deed of Trust recorded on advances at the time of the or other common designa- t . FONTANA HERALD AND to be:16175 Seville Avenue RATION, P.O. Box 85309, CASH (payable at time of (Estimated)Accrued interest 11/22/00 Instrument initial publication of the No- tion,if any,shown herein: Business NEWS Fontana California'92335 San Diego,CA92186-5309, sale.in lawful money of the and additional advances, if 20000431945,Book,Page tice of Sale is:$83,326.31 TRUSTOR: JESUS The undersigned Trustee Sales Information(916)974- United States, by cash, a any,will increase this figure of Official Records in the The beneficiary under.said, SAUCEDO,A MARRIED NOTICE OF TRUSTEESs disclaims any liability for any 6099, General Information cashiers check drawn by a prior to sale.The beneficiary Office of the Recorder of Deed of Trust heretofore ex- MAN AS HIS SOLE AND SALE i incorrectness of the street (858) 689-9735 DEBBIE state or national bank, a under said Deed of Trust SAN BERNARDINO ecuted and delivered to the SEPARATE PROPERTY • TS No.: 20029073500396 address and other common MCLAIN,ASSISTANT SEC- check drawn by a state or heretofore executed and de- County,California,executed undersigned a written Dec- Recorded 3/13/97 as Instru- Name Loan No.:1509298480 FHA./ designation, if any, shown RETARY NPP0094315 05/ federal credit union, or a livered to the undersigned a by: ADISLAO AVILA, A laration of Default and De- ment No. 19970085820 in VA/MI No.:048-2198202 -; •herein.'Said sale will •be 02/02,05/09/02,05/16/02 check drawn by a state •or • written Declaration of De- SINGLE MAN, as Trustor, mend for Sale,and a written Book , page of Official YOU ARE IN DEFAULT UN- made,but without covenant CNS386389# federal savings and loan as- fault and Demand for Sale, MORTGAGE ELEC- Notice of Default and Elec- Records in the office of the ir 9 DER A DEED OF TRUST or warranty, expressed or FONTANA HERALD AND sociation, savings associa- and a written Notice of De- TRONIC REGISTRATION tion to Sell.The undersigned Recorder of SAN BERNAR DATED MAY 30,2000 UN- implied,regarding title,pos- NEWS • Lion,or savings bank speci- fault and Election to Sell SYSTEMS,INC.,as Benefi- caused said Notice of De- DINO County,California, LESS YOU TAKE ACTION session,or encumbrances, • fied in section 5102 of the The undersigned caused ciary. WILL SELL AT PUB- fault and Election to Sell to Date of Sale: 5/23/2002 at TO PROTECT YOUR to pay the remaining princi- NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S Financial Code and autho- said Notice of Default and LIC AUCTION TO THE be recorded in the.county 12:00 P,M PROPERTY, IT MAY BE pal sum of the note(s) se- SALE Trustee Sale No. riled to do business in this Election to Sell to be re- HIGHEST BIDDER FOR where the real property is Place of.Sale; AT-THE SOLD.AT A PUBLIC SALE, cured by said Deed of Trust, 02-00538 Loan No. state). At: AT THE EN- corded in the county where CASH (payable at time of located. LoneStar Mort- NORTH ARROWHEAD AV IF YOU NEED AN EXPLA- with interest thereon,as pro- 59074292 Title Order No. TRANCE TO THE CITY the real property is located sale in lawful money of the gagee Services,L.L.C.is a ENUE ENTRANCE TO THE NATION OF THE NATURE vided in said note(s), ad- 1060203 APN 0240-351-03 HALL AT 303 E. "B" and more than three months United States, by cash, a debt collector attempting to COUNTY COURTHOUSE -OF THE PROCEEDING vances, if any under the FHA#0480571926703 YOU STREET,ONTARIO,CA,all have elapsed since such re- cashiers check drawn by a collect a debt:Any inform.: 351 NORTH ARROWHEAD IL AGAINST YOU, YOU terms of said Deed of Trust, ARE IN DEFAULT UNDER right,title and interest con- cordation. Date: 05/02/02, state or national bank, a tion obtained will be used for AVENUE, SAN BERNAR- SHOULD CONTACT IA fees,charges and expenses A DEED OF TRUST DATED veyed to and now held by it ARM FINANCIAL CORPO- check drawn by a state or that purpose. Date: 05/02/ DINO,CALIFORNIA LAWYER. of the Trustee and of the 03/11/98. UNLESS YOU under said Deed of Trust in RATION, P.O. Box 85309, federal credit union, or a 2002 First American Lend- Property Address is pur- s , On May 23, 2002 at trusts created.by said Deed TAKE ACTION TO PRO- ,the property situated in said San Diego,CA 92186-5309, check drawn bya state or ers Advantage, LoneStar Best P P Y 9 g ported to be: 14261 SAN 12:OOPM, LoneStar Mort- of Trust.The total amount of TECT YOUR PROPERTY, :County,California describing Sales Information(916)974- federal savings and loan as-. Mortgagee Services,L I C., . BE N ITO STREET • ' gagee Services, L.L:C., as the.unpaid balance of the IT MAY BE SOLD AT PUB the land therein: "As more 6099,General Information sociation, savings associa- 3 First American Way,Santa FONTANA,CA 92336 duly appointed Trustee Lin- obligation secured by the LIC SALE. IF YOU NEED .fully described on the above (858) 689-9735 NINA tion,or savings bank speci- Ana, CA 92707 Ricardo APN#: 1100-471-07-0-000 Prices der and pursuant to Deed of property to be sold and rea AN EXPLANATION OF THE :mentioned Deed of Trust". DANAHER, ASSISTANT fied in section 5102 of the JuarezAuttforized Signature The total amount secured by Trust recorded June 5,2060, sonable estimated costs, NATURE OF THE PRO The property heretofore de- SECRETARY NPP0094471 Financial Code and autho- For Trustee's Sale informa- said instrument as of the as Instrument No. expenses and advances at CEEDINGS AGAINST YOU, ;scribed is being sold'as is'. 05/02/02, 05/09/02, 05/16/ rized to do business in this tion please call 925-603- 'time of initial publication of ' T y�y 20009200414, of Official the time of the initial publi- YOU SHOULD CONTACTA !The street address and other 02 state). At: AT THE EN- 7342 RSVP#38763 05/02/ this notice is $154,992.90, i d Records in the office of the cation of the Notice of Sale LAWYER. On May 22, ' common designation,if any, CNS-386434# TRANCE TO CITY HALL AT 02 05/09/02 05/16/02 which includes the total . , County Recorder of San is:$133,645.20 2002,at 11:30 AM,ARM FI- of the real property de- FONTANA HERALD'AND 303- E. "B" STREET, ON- amount of the unpaid Dal ' Y nrnnrr7inn r`n„n4.r C4nVri n{ T4... 1.....,,t:..:.._..,.,,.:,,.,•,,.,.: ni Af.,/�i ni ninnnnnnri�ni ___.� � _�_.-_ • - -, Name Statement expires Bernardino County on April Vacaville;CA 95688 — The filing of this statement the County CI of•San Director, of Industrial provisions Government right to reject any and all your company name, street, . , FICTITIOUS BUSINESS . five years from the date it 2,2002. Kay Burkhart, 5633 Osburh does not of itself authorize Bernardino Co on April Relations will be required. Code Section 590, which bids or to waive irregularities address; contact person, was filed in the-office of the The . registrant(s) • NAME STATEMENT . • . :Place,Riverside,CA 92506 the use in this state of a 12,2002. Affirmative action to ensure allows certain curities to in any bid. ..telephone nrimber and fax . File No.2002-03712 ' County Clerk. A New commenced. to transact Laurie Leonard, 2055'N. Fictitious Business Name in The ' registrant(s) against• discrimination in be substituted r, monies David S.Bail ' number.- • Fictitious Business •Name business under the fictitious The. following person(s).is Central Ave#10A,Highland, violation of•the rights of commenced to• transact -employment practices on the withheld to ensure Assistant Superintendent (are)doing business as: ' ' • ' Statement must be filed business name or names CA 92346 - , another under Federal, business u er the fictitious basis of race,color,national performance. ' Business Services Division. A Pm-proposal Conference . . before that time: listed above on 4/1/2002.' RED SKY ENTERPRISES,. Rowena Mateo,5'19 1/2 W. State,or common law(See business me or names origin, ancestry, sex. or A mandatory pre-bid San Bernardino City Unified has been scheduled for . 14011 Princeton Court, . The firing of this statement NOTICE-This Fictitious Olive Ave,- Redlands, CA Section 14411 et seq., listed abo on N/A. . religion,will also be required. conference-for all erested School District • . 10:00,a.m.on May.8,2002. • •-- ' - does not of itself authorize Name. Statement' expires Fontana,CA 92336. 92373 . . • Business and Professions NOTICE- is - FictitioUs The . CITY hereby bidders will ee he in the. San Bernardino County, Proposals are due no'later . . • .the use in this State of a five years from the date it Michael Gates Enterprises: Sue Nolen; . 22;330 Code). ' Name atement expires affirmatively ensures, that Building rvices State of California • , than 2:00 p.m. on May 29, - , . '' Fictitious Business Name in was filed in the office of the California, 14011 Princeton Spurbrook Dr., Wildomar, First Filing •. five ye 'from the date it, minority• . business Conference Roo 956 05/02/02,05/09/02 • 2,002,at the above address, . '. violation of the rights of County: Clerk. A New Co.urt,Fo.ntana,•CA 92336.. , CA 92595 04/1i/02, 04/18/02, 04/25/02, was fil in the office of the .enterprises will be afforded West 9th Street .San _ , SBS-388703# ‘"Floor Reception area. - ., - ' ' another under Federal, Fictitious Business Name This business is conducted, This business is conducted 05/02/02 Coun Clerk. A New full opportunity.to submit Bernardino, CA 92 1 on . • . . . . State,or common law(See Statement must be filed by A Corporation . .by A General Partnership SBS-378708# Fictiti •Business Name bids in response to this Friday, May 10, 2 2 at The contract to be awarded I declare that all information, NO CE INVITING SEALED TI I d I th t II' f r 'Section .14411 et seq., before that time. . . . ec are a a in orma ion State nt must• be filed notice 'and will not be 8:00'p.m. The•Distri will may be subject to a financial in this statement is true and • • Btisiness 'and Professions' The filing of this.statement , in this statement is true and befor that time. • discriminated against On the conduct site visits fol wing • BIDS • assistance contract between ; Code). . . does'not of itself anthorize, correct. . ' correct. • FICTITIOUS BUSINESS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF The ing of this statement basis of race,color,national the pre-bid, conferen .to the Southern California ' Filing • • ,the use in this'state of a MICHAEL GATES S/LINDA REHM .NAME STATEMENT doe not.of itself'authorize origin, ancestry, .sex,•or. inspect those areas th will SAN SEVAINE CREEK Regional Rail Authority and• 05/02/02, 05/09/02, 05/16/02, Fictitious Business'Name in ., ENTERPRISES,INC. - File No 2002-04069 This statement was filed with : . the se in this state of a religion in any consideration be renovated. It .is . BIKE AND the U.S. •Department of . 05/23/02 • violation' of the'rights. of S/PETER M.GATES,CEO the County Clerk .of San The following person(s).is Fic ous Business Name in leading to the award of mandatory that each. der RECREATIONAL TRAIL Transportation Therefore • .. This statement was filed with B. •d. .1 (are)doing business as: FROM FOOTHILL • • ' • ' , • • SBS-386378# another under Federal, -- emar ino County on Apri vio ion of the right§ of contract. , have . an auth iz ed all offerors will be required to . ' State,or common law'(See the County Clerk of San 2,2002 - ' ALAVE •ENTERPRISES, an her under Federal, The contract documents call representative •attend this BOULEVARD•TO PACIFIC . • • certify that they are not • , Sedtion .144,11 et seq.; Bernardino County on March The • registrant(s) 11210 San Lucas Dr.Loma St e,or common law(See for monthly progress meeting so that a tear •ELECTRIC RAILROAD debarred, suspended or . . BID NO.SB-41-02 _ .. • -FICTITIOUS BUSINESS Businesa and, Professions. 21;2002. • —. gonimenced.. to• transact Linda,CA 92354 ' S tion 14411 et seq., payments based upon the understanding of the ,,bp'e • otherwise. excluded from . . ,. •, NAME STATEMENT • The . registrant(s) Bruce D Bradley,11210 San PUBLIC ' NOTICE IS •• • , . Code). ', • ' business under the fictitious B irloss and,Professions engineer's estimate of the and detail of the wor.may participating •in .federally . File No..2002-04869 . First Filing.. , commenced to •transact . . . . .. CITY OF FONTANA, as Lucas Dr; Loma Linda, CA HEREBY GIVEN that the • . .. business name or names de). • percentage, of work be understood.Failure o be • assisted projects. .' 7 - The following person(s) i. ., 04/25/02,'05/02/02, 05/09/02, business under the fictitious listed above on 01-01-2002. 92334 ng, . . completed. The CITY will represented at this rm-bid . _ ' . ' (are)doing business as: 05/16/02 " business name.or names NOTICE-This• .. Fictitious This business is'conducted , CITY invites sealed bida for 18/02, 04/25/02, 05/02/02; retain 10 percept of each conference will result i the ---, The Authority ' has . ' . ' . TL CUSTOM .. DESIGN, • ,SBS-.384242# listed above on N/A. .Name Statement expires by an individual . ti of yoUr bid 11-11S r /09/02 • . progress• payment as rejec on . . , the above stated project and established' Disadvantaged ' - ' ; •23476 Knepps Cut Off Rd., . NOTICE-This .. Fictitious five years'from the date•it I declare that all information . SBS-375331# security for completion'of.the WILL BE THE NLY ft • su h bids in the wi receive c Business Enterprise (DBE) . , Crestline, CA 92325, (909) . Name Statement expires was filed in the office of the in this statement is true and , ; balance of the work.At the OPPORTUNITY . TO e City Clerk u to • . • offices of th . . P participation goals for these . .. -338-7432, P.O. Box 3791, FICTITIOUS BUSINESS, five years from the date it County Clerk. A New correct, request and expense of the INSPECT THE 1 TES the hour of 2.00pm on the projects. The goal • • Crestline,CA 92325. . NAME STATEMENT was filed in the office of the Fictitious Business Name S/BRUCE BRADLEY FICTITIOUS RUSINESS successful bidder, the CITY PRIOR TO BID. Plan or a 23rd day of May,20.02, at established is ten percent . • ' Tomas Ledesma, '23476 File No.2002-05011 • County Clerk. A .New This statement was filed with NAME STATEMENT which rime thdey , will be o Statement must be filed will pay. the amounts .so minimum of three(3) ,ours • (10/o). This goal must be . •• Knapps 'Cut Off Rd., The following person(s) is Fictitious Business Name before that time. ' . the County Clerk of San File No.2002-03195 ' retained upon compliance to walk all the sites.• . ea publicly, opene and t d met,or good faith efforts to. - ' Crestline,CA 92325. (are)doing business as: . Statement must be filed The filing of this statement Bernardino County on March he following person(s) is with the requirements of No bidder may withdr, v his . . aloud. •. meet the goal must be • This business is conducted ALLIANCE '• CHARTERS, before that time. . 28,2002' . . are)doing business as: The work of improvement does not of'itself authorize Public Contract Code bid for a period of 6C days demonstrated to meet the ' ' . • . by an individual. 505 New Jersey Street, The filing of this statement the use in this state of a The . registrant(s) AURINGROUP U$A,9811 Section 22300 and the after,the date set f the consists of furnishing all •goal, if.a bidder is to be , .- • ' .• .I declare that all information Redlands, CA 92373; (909) does not of itself authorize Fictitious Business Name in Commenced to transact adera Court, , Rancho provisions of'the contract opening of bids. .- Is materials,.equipment, too , considered responsive: The ' - . s in this statement is true and 792-1105; P.O. Box 9088, the use in this state of a violation of the rights of business under the fictitious ucamonga, California documents .pertaining to SAN BERNARDINO CITY labor, and .incidentals as goal is based on the-total . _ .• correct. ' . Redlande,CA 92376. , Fictitious Business Name.in business name or names 91730 required by the Plans, . . another under Federal, Substitution of Securities. UNIFIED S .00L , contract amount ' , -, ' S/TOMAS LEDESMA Health-Link Transportation violation of the rights of •State,or common law(See listed above on N/A . 'vl&A Equipment:Inc.,CA, Bids must be prepared on DISTRICT Specifications and'Contract . ' This statement was filed with Corporation, 505 • New another under Federal, NOTICE-This Fictitious 9811 Ladera Court,Rancho Documents for the above the City provided proposal David S.-Bail . Offerors shall edsure that in • - Section. 14411 et .seg ., . -„ . the County Clerk of San Jersey Street,Redlands,CA State,or comm6n law(See Business and Professions Name•Statement expires Cucamonga, California. ' stated project. The general forms and completely filled Assistant Superintend ft . .• e regard to this solicitation,. „ . Bernardino'County on April 92373.. ' t Section 14411 et seq., Cade). five years from the date it 91730 out in conformance with the Business Services Di....don items of work to be don •DBE firms will be afforded , . . 15,2002. , This busineSs is conducted Business and professions 'First Filing, • was filed in the office of the This business is conducted hereunder consist of the Instructions to Bidders and Pre-Bid Conference May • full opportunity to comPete , " , The - registrant(s) by a corporation. . , Code). . .. 04/18/02 04/25/02 05/02/02 'County Clerk. A' New by a corporation 2 404780 8:Of a m all proposal forms must be 10, 2002 @ . . . construction Of clearing & for subcontracting work and . . commenced to transact. .1 declare that all.information Filing .. .. . . 05/09/02' .' . ' Fictitious BuCiness Name I declare that all information Submitted .,in a sealed (MANDATORY' - ilding grubbing, surveying/staking, wilt not be discriminated , ' ,,. business under the fictitious in,this statement is true and 04/18/02, 04/25102, 05/02/02, . . SBS-382190# Statement must be filed 'n this statement is true and envelope.Plainly marked on Services) , , asphalt and concrete paving, against on the grounds of • . ., •business name or names,.correct . , .. .. 05/09/02•• , . •. • . before that time. . . orrect. • - the outside "SEALED BID Bid Opening:May 1 ,.2002 asphalt sturry sealing,dhain- race,color or national origin. , listed above on 04/15/2002. .5/. ..GARY .FRITZS.CHE. . -SI3S-382235# . The filing of this statement &A EQUIPMENT.INC. FOR.CONSTRUCTION OF @ 10:00 a.m. • link fencing, concrete curb . , „ • NOTICE-This FictitiouS President •••-,.• , , • • FICTITIOUS BUSINESS does not of itself authorize ./ ALBERTO SOLANO, SOUTH , ' HIGHLAND 05/02/02,05/09/02' and gUtter,.signing and The successful bidder will be , Name Statement expires This statement was filed with. • NAME STATEMENT .the use in this state of a .ecretary AVENUE AND JUNIPER striping landscape irrigation, S,BS- :8708# ' • required to comply with all five years frorn the date it the,County,'Clerk'of San • 'BUSINESS FICTITIOUS . File No.2002-05089 Fictitious Business Name in 'his statement was filed with AVENUE SEWER SYSTEM . landscape planting and 90- r bl I rt ' . • ,app ica e equa oppo unity , was filed in the office of the Bernardino County on April NAM STATEMENT . • The following person(s) is violation of the rights of e County Clerk of San IMPROVEMENTS,BID NO. ‘• day maintenance. laws and regulations.. County Clerk.. A New 17,2002. File No.2002-04017 (are)doing business as: another under Federal, lernardino County on March SP46-02-DO NOT OPEN • ' NOTICE T I . Copies of Plans, . , . . - • . Fictitious Business Name The, " • tegistrant(s) The-following person(s) is PARDEE CONSTRUCTION State,or common law(See 1,2002 , WITH REGULAR MAIL". CONTRACTORS It.LUNG Specifications,and Contract The Authority affirmatively • '• Statement must be filed commenced to transact (are)doing business as: COMPANY,.10880 Wilshire' Section 14411' et seq., he registrant(s) FOR BID' Documents 'are available The CITY reserves the right assures that it does not , MAIL BOXES ETC.#1703, OWNER: SAN from the City.of Fontana • before that time. business under the fictitious ' Boulevard, Suite 1900, Los Business and Professions .mmenced• to transact to reject any or all bids,to discriminate on the grounds - 7231 Boulder Ave,Highland, . ''The filing of this statement business name or names Angeles,CA 90024. Code). • siness under the fictitious . BERNARDINO CITY (City),. at ,8353 Sierra CA 92346. • waive .any irregularity, to of race, color, ethnicity, , • does not of itself authorize listed above on 4/17/2002. Pardee Homes,a California First Filing ' siness name or names UNITED - ' •CHOOL Avenue, Fontana, . . Edward T. Florez, 29542 ' accept any bid or portion religion, sex or national • ' the use in this state of a NOTICE-This Fictitious Corporation, ' A0577358, 04/11/02, 04/18/02, 04/25/02, li ed above on 02/28/02 thereof,and to take all bids DISTRICT., • California 92335, (909) origin. .• Payment of Santa Ana Cyn. Rd., . Fictitious BUsiness Name in Name Statement expires California, 10880. Wilshire 05/02102 , TICE-This Fictitious PROJECT:BID N ,.13-02 '350-7610,upon payment of • - Highland,CA 92346. . under advisement for a prevailing wages . and • . violation of the rights of five years from the date it Boulevard, Suite 1900, Los SBS-378697# N e Statement expires 'period of ninety five (95) 'CHILLED WATER a Thirty-five 'Dollars Compliance with Brandi A. Florez, 29542 - • another under. Federal, was filed in the office of the Angeles,CA 90024. fi years from the date it day,. • . CENTRAL PLANT ($35.00r non-refundable fee employment and .training . Santa Ana Cyn 'Rd, • • • . 'State,or common law(See County . Clerk. •A New - This business is conducted . w- filed in the office of the EQUIPMENT ($45.00 if mailed). Any , At the time of contract programs established by the .- Section '14411 et seq., Fictitious Business Narne Highland,CA 92346. ' ec . by a corporation. FICTITIOUS BUSINESS• Co lty Clerk. A New REPLACEMENT questions pertaining to this This business is cond ted NAME STATEMENT award, . the 'prime ' State of California . • Business•and Professions Statement must be filed I declare that all information . Fict 'ous Business Name EMMERTON ,• project should be directed to contractor shall posseas a Department of Industrial . . Code). before that time. • . ' by Husband&Wife .. in this statement is true and File No.2002-04080 Sta hent must be filed i ..A.. ..B.. ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Leticia Ortiz-at(909) 350- C ass, or a ass CI Relations is required. The following person(s) is befo that time. SAN BE ' ARDINO, 6501. , 'First Filing , 'The filing.of this statement !declare that all information correct • ' . Contractor's License , 04/25/02, 05/02/02, 05/09/02, doe's not of itself-authorize • in this statement is true and PARDEE HOMES ' (are)doing business as:. The ing of this statement - • CALIFORNIA . Proposals must . be T . and/or any combination of o order documents contact ' 05/16/02 the use in this state of a correct. • ' " S/DAVID L.SCOLL,Senior • SENIORS ONLY does ot of itself authorize ENGINEER: ack & accompanied Issr a,proposal Class "C" •specialty Janette Shew (telephone . . SBS-384965# Fictitious Business Name'in S/BRANDI A.FLOREZ- 1 Nip -- • . . FINANCIAL,330 S.Highway the u• in this state of a , . Associates' guarantee ih the.form•of contractors r , scensets) and: address above). All , This statement was filed w'th • - 173, Suite 8,5 .Lake ' violation ;Of-the 'rights of ' This statement wadfiled with Fictitio Business Name in 300'Carlsbad Inge Drive, cash, cashier's check, a . , the County Clerk-of San Arrowhead,CA 923 2,(909) sufficient to perform the other ineuiries should be • . . another •under Federal,. the County Clerk of San violatio of the..rights of Suite 205 ,, Certified check or bid bond directed;In writing to Abbe - . • • FICTITIOUS BUSINESS State,o.r.co I (S . . rnmon aw ,eq. Bernardino County on March •Bernardino County oh April 337-9404; (909) 337-9404; another under Federal, BY ORDER'OF CITY OF Carlsbad,CA 9 .08 available'to the CITY in the McClenahan, •Contract - ., • . NAME STATEMENT - 'Secticin 1.4411 :et, seq., ., .....,-. _ 28,2002:' .19;2002. . P.O. Box 2391,• Lake State,or ommon law(See FONTANA' , . 760/720-1205 • amount of at least ten Administrator,• email . ,• .File No.2002-04232 . ' -Business'. and ,ProieSsions• 'The, ' " regiStrent(s) •The -'.• .••registrant(s) Arrowhead,CA 92352 ' Section -411 et seq., ,Dated this 29th d f A 'I ay o pri Notice is her. y given that percent (10%) of the total mcclenahan@scrra.net, or - • The following person(a) is Code)._ '' ' commenced to''transact .. Commenced to transact Reed S. Montgomery, 150 Business d Professions 2002. the. San B: ardino City amount.bid. Any proposal fax, ,. . (213)452-0425; . . • (are)doing business as: • First Filing.., . business under the fictitious .business under the fictitious Birchwood Drive,' Lake Code). . City of Fontana Unified S ool :District not accompanied by such a telephone:213-452-0208. ' ,.,, OUTLOOK ' CONCEPTS, 04/25/02, 05/02/02, 05/09/02, business name or narnes business name or names Arrowhead,CA 92352'. Filing• 8353 Sierra Avenue. ' ' (s.13.C.11.S.r , of San guarantee Will .not be 05/02/02 -' .. ' " ,.". • INC., 25612 Barton Road 05/16/02 • ' listed above On,N/A. listed above on 2/28/02. 'This business is conducted 03/19/02, 03/ '02, 04/02/02, F ' ontana,CA 92335 Bernardino County, considered.A payment bond _ , #347, Lorna Linda, ,CA .. ' NOTICE-This Fictitious by an individual SBS-388611# . --' SBS-384241# NOTICE-This Fictitious 04'09/02, 04/1. .2, 04/25/02, '(909)350-6792 ' California„ hereinafter and a performance bond, .. ' .- 92354,(909)821-7094. . , Name Statement expires Name Statement expires I declare that all information 05/02/02,05/09'. ' ' 05/02/02 referred as the"Owner", each in an amount equal to • '•.- Outlook COncepts, .Inc.,. . . - . five years from the date it five years from.the date it in this statement is true and . S: 365836# ' acting •'and through its 100 %of the total contract NOTICE OF APPLICATION SBS-388748# .1"- , - 25612 Barton Rd. #347, FICTITIOUS BUsittEs wat filed in the office of the was filed in the office of the correct. - . • , . . . Gove g 13oard, is inviting amount,.shall be required FOR A GAS AND .' • -• '• Loma Linda,CA 92354. . NAME STATEMENT - County Clerk. A New County Clerk. A New .S/ , REED' S. bid .for Chilled• Water concurrently with the ELECTRIC REVENUE This business is conducted File No.2002-05088 Fictitious Business Name MONTGOMERY FICTITIOUS BUS. SS , . . Fictitious Business Name NOTICE TO'• ' . ral Plant Equipment execution of the contract INCREASE TO FUND THE • by A Corporation. The following person(s) is Statement must 'be filed This statement was filed with NAME STATEM' T' , .. Statement must be filed CONTRACTORS "ePlacement and Energy and shall be in the form set CALIFORNIA ALTERNATE • , . . ' I declare that all information (are)doing business as: before that time. before that tinie. the County Clerk of San •File No.2002-047' CALLING FOR BI I Management ' Control forth in 'the contract RATES FOR ENERGY . , . in this statement is true and (1)GREENVINE,(2)ORCO The filing of this statement The filing of'this statement Bernardino County on March The following person( •., . (Sectio System, .'at. Emmerton documents. PROGRAM • correct.' LAND COMPANY, ' (3) does not of itself alithorize does not of itself,authorize 29,2002 • (are)doing business as: ,„ : :Y GIVEN Elementary School 1888 Any contract entered into On April 18, 2002, Pacific' S/JOHNNY- ,President EADINGTON. FRUIT the use in this state of.a the use in this state of a The,: . registrant(s) AMERICAN MEDICAL that the San Bernardino City Arden Ave.,San Bernardino, pursuant to this notice will Gas and Electric Company . ' This statement was filed with COMPANY, 191 Granite Fictitious Business Name in Fictitious Business Name in commenced to transact RESPONSE (AMR),.14828 Unified School District of 'CA 92404' ' incorporate the provisions of (PG&E)filed Application No.. • • the County Clerk of San Street,Suite A,Corona,CA violation of the rights 'of violation of the rights of business under the fictitious Seventh Street, Victorville,. San .Bernardino County, Alt,bids shall be lump sum the State Labor Code. 02-04-031 with the California , Bernardino County on April 92879-12861' ' ' , another - under Federal; ,another -under Federal, business name or names CA 92392; 2821 S. Parker State of California,acting by basis; Segregated bids will Labor Code Section 1735 Public Utilities Commiseion . -'2,2002. , - • The'Eadingfon'CoMpanies, State,-or common lah:(See ,State,•or common law(See listed above on 3/29/2002 Road, 10th Floor, Aurora; and through•its Government not be.accepted. Bids shall .requires that no (CPUC)requesting approval , ' .The ' registrant(sj ,LIX;;CA,.,191-,Granite.Street, Section 14411 et' seq., Section. 1441.1 . et seq., NOTICE-This Fictitious CO 80014.• . . Board,•hereafter referred to be submitted on the form discrimination be made in of PG&E's administrative • commenced to. transact „Suite,A,Cbrona„CA,92879- Business and Professions Business and-,Professions Name Statement expires Desert •Valley Medical as the"District"will receive furnished.by 'the Owner. the employment of persons costs .for its. California: '/ business Under the fictitioUs, ,1286.:..,..,,,,,,,,.„,, • ... . Code).. . ._ '- .Code),"---• ' • five years from the,date.it Transport, 2821 S, Parker up to bUt not later than:May •Bids shall be received in the upon public works because Alternate Rates for Energy . 7. business name or names' Thisr;b0siness is,-conducted.•04/18/02, 04/25/02, 05/02/02; „ was filed in the office otthe Road, 10th Flocir, Aurora, .17, 2002 @ 10:00 a.m.,- office.•of. the' Purchasing of the race,,religious creed, (CARE) pregram. CARE . • ,, listed above on March 4,• ,by--,,A ,Limited ,Liability- 05/09/02-7 . . -',04/25/02;705/02/02:'05/09/02, County Clerk. A. New CO 80014- •- • • - . sealed bids for the award of, Department,• Board. of color, national origin, provides a 20 percent . ., 2002. -.,Company •• • ,...-.-•.,•••'CA-•,-'--••• -:"SBS-382227# ,05/1-6/02 '''''"•"-•''" Fictitious' BUsiness .Name'-This,business•is conducted. •a"contraCt for: '. -''•,• 'Education Building;- 777 ancestry,physical handicap, discount off electric and gas 0 NOTICE-This Fictitious-1019971,7-5Ci39- --.... .i.-,..-...-,-1-..-.-...--....... •-,- :..,-. .• -,-••... - - — Statement must be filed.cby a Corporation - .-'•'.- . .. Bo-a798 I 94F Re-Bid,Requireinants 1' 'Wirth 1 `-"F" Street; San medical condition, marital rates for eligible,- . •-.'Name Statement expires, I declare-that altinformation •,•••.,,•,,,,,,;4.,..,,,,.;;Ig,- i'jitsig .s,, --• •:-..,--• - -..- - before that time. ••' • - .I declare that•all.information •• Contract for Asphalt •' Betnardino1 CA.92410,up to status, or sex of such participating, low-income five years from the date it in this statement is true-and -•r"-•""‘-``'''''' The filing of this statement in this statement is true and Payindonrt Repair- ' but.riot later than the Bid persons,except as provided customers. In, addition, . NAME STATEMENT was filed in the office of the correct . ' .' . FICTITIOUS BUSINESS does not of itself autborize correct. - . .. . • . : Disirictwide Deadline of 2:00. p.m., in Government Code CARE customers ' are ,- • • . County Clerk. A New THE EADINGTON File No.2002-04173 NAME STATEMENT the use in this.state'of a DESERT . VALLEY ' Bid Ito.16-02 Friday, May 24, 2002, Section 12940.Corripliance. exempt- from electric . ' , Fictitious Business, Name 'COMPANIES LLC •• The following person(s) is . File No.2002-05087 Fictitious Business Name in MEDICAL TRANSPORT , District reseryes the right to Admin. Building. Bids with the prevailing rates of surcharges paid by other . Statement must be filed S/ GEORGE'EADINGTON, (are)doing business as: The following person(s) is violation of the rights of S/LORI A.E.EVANS,Vice award all oc.part of this received after this tinie will wages and apprenticeship customers. In the . before that time. Assistant Secretary. KIDS KARTS, 4220 W. (are)doing business as: another under Federal, President/Asst.Secretary contract . to 1, the lowest not be accepted. All bids Reemployment standards application, PG&E ' is ' • ' The,filing of this statement This statement was filed•with ' - Double Adobe Rd., McNeal ANDERSON AIR State,or common law{See This statement was filed with. responsible 'bidder. The and documentation shall be established by the State requesting an increase in ' does not of itself authorize the County Clerk of San AZ 85617.' - .CONDITIONING, 1872 N. Section 14411 et seq.,• the County Clerk of San lowest "total 'composite opened 'and publicly read Director of Industrial electric revenues of $5.1 - the use in this state of a Bernardino County on April Ray Francis Mulan , .ax 4220 Case Street,. Orange, CA Business and Professions Bernardinb County on.April price" wilr be the.basis for aloud as specified closing Relations will be required. million, (a 0.05 percent - • ' Fictitibus•Business Name in 19,2002. VV. , Dougle Adobe Rd., 92865 . Code). 12,2002 • contract award time. . . Affirmative action to ensure increase) end' a , gas. - violation of.the rights of The registrant(s) McNeal,AZ 85617. . - AMS America, Inc., ,860 First Filing The. registrant(s) All bids shall be made on a Bidding bocuments may be againat ,discrimination. in increase of,$2.7 milliOn (a '. another 'under Federal, commenced to transact This business is-conducted • Ridge Lake Blvd.,Memphis, 04/11/02, 04/18/02, 04/25/02, commenced to transact bid form furnfthed by the examined at the'following employment practices on the 0.12 • percent .increase) State,or common low(See business under the fictitious by An Individual . TN 38120.. . 05/02/02. . ' business under the fictitious District. I' ' location: . basis of race,color,national effective January 1, 2002, Section 14411' et seq., business name or names I declare that all information This business is conducted • SBS-377610# business name or names Bids shall'be received at: NACK&ASSOCIATES origin, ancestry, sex, or for the cost of outreach to Business and Professions listed above on 7/1/1997. in this statement is true and by a corporation 2264890 • listed above on June 1998 • Purchasing 'Department, 300 Carlsbad Village Drive . religion will also be required, educate customers about • Code). NOTICE-This ' 'Fictitious correct. • . • I declare that all information , NOTICE-This • Fictitious SAN BERNARbINO CITY Suite 205 • The CITY hereby the program and processing , First Filing . . Name Statement expires S/RAY F.MULANAX in this statement is true and FICTITIOUS BUSINESS Name Statement expires ,UNIFIED' .''SCHOOL Carlsbad,CA 92008 affirmatively ensures that and administration costs'to • 04/25/02, 05/02/02, 05/09/02, five years-from the date it- This statement was filed with correct: " : . NAME STATEMENT five years from the dat 't e i DISTRICT,.777't North ''F" 760/720-1205 . minority. business sign 'customers up,•verify. '05/16/02 • was filed'in the'officeef the 'the County Clerk.,of.San AMS AMERICA;INC: File No.2002-04276• • . was filed in the office of the St t San -a rd' ' SAN BERNARDINO CITY enterprises will be afforded eligibility . and run the ' . SBS-384954i,'County 'Clerk."'A."NeW 'Bernardino County:on-April •S/ 'JOSEPH 'B. 'HANKS, The following person(s) County Clerk. A New Catfornia 924101, nd shall UNIFIED , , SCHOOL full opportunity ,to subrnit 'Program.'The total of the • '•'Fidtitielle-".Bdainees'''N#nie '1;2002. _ -7--7-77-:- .3-6,,,..patarx . . (are).doing business..a..m.:. ,. Fictitio,,,Is ,Business Name be opened and pielicly read DISTRICT , BUILDING bids in response to Mis,.,electric and ;gas revenue . • • ''-SfatemenT mudt"'be:'Sired''The-- -- registrant(sy, '''''' This striteMenf Wg,filed with, TED S SHORT STOP .Stafq.nenl,', l'' l';'... flib.d , ' , FICTITIOUS BUSINESS ''''b'efol-eriliaffilbe:"'" "'• - comMenced, -to. transact •the C011riljr CleN of San DRIVEN IN, 1616'1)VW-- 111-1.O.:,.--,.-..;:::.;-• aloud at-the,above-stated, .SERVICES•DEPARTMENT notice and will not be...in6reeses„mg ueeted in the efore th4time •'.- • . 1 ' .• 956 Oth S '• diScriminated against on the'applicatiOn is$7.8 Million. ..- ,W. treet.,•• , . , • . NAME STATEMENT - 'The-filing'-of lfils'Stateriie:nt,'-busIness-'under the•fictitious '13dradrdiriO-gbilinty'..en April Highland ' Ave.,----^-Sa .. no , ..;", •-0.,,--,... _hmaand p ace, _, tle.filing,gt.tbig-,fftateMentr.-Each bid-must.cordorm-and. San Bernardino,CA 92411 basis of race,color,national PG&E is-not asking at this v File No.2002-04509 ' dna.not or itself authcirize 'business-name-or-names' 19:2662--. --- - Bernardino , CA • 92411r •-; ' • • .• ,oges_not otitself autnorize be responsive I to 'the 909/388-6100 , • origin, ancestry, sex, or time to-include the increase ' " The following person(s) is thd use in this-state of'a..•listed'above ort 04115/98:•' •The. • • ... registrant(s) 20965 Canyon Ridge Rd.r- 7 the..use in this_state,Of,a Contract Documents, which Copiesl--'of the -Bidding religion in any consideration in rates.' Instead PG&E '' (are)doing business as: . Fictitious•BusineSS'Name•in 'NOTICE-ThIS''"--Fictitious commenced. to .transact Diamond Bar,CA 91789 , FictitiouS Business Name in are•on file for examination at. Documents may be obtained leading to the award of would record costs in an • - 'BEYOND' LIMOUSINE violation of the rights of Name -Staterrient' expires business under the fictitious Jong VV.'Chi,20965 Canyon violation of the rights of the Buildin l Services' 'at the Engineer's office. contract • account and those costs . •. SBRVICE,3154 Blythe Ave., another under .Federal, 'five'years from the date it business name or names Ridge Rd.,Diamond Bar,CA another.. under Federal g W E h ' b'dd ' Th t t d t II Id b ' I d d ' future . Department, 956. est 9th ac prime i er may e con rac ocumen s ca, wou e Inc u e in .Highland, CA 92346, (909) State,or common law(See was filed in the office of the listed above on 10/11/00 91789-• State, or common law(See Street San Berndrdino CA obtain up to three(3)sets of for monthly progress 'electric and gas.rate change • . , 425-5191. • •' .. •• Section 14411 et seq, County Clerk. A New NOTICE-This 'Fictitious This business is conducted Section 14411 'et seq.,. 92411' •' ' , ' • Bidding Documents in payments based upon the proceedings. . .Andres De La Torre, 3164 Business and Profession's Fictitious Business Name Name Statement expires by an individual Business and Professions ' ' ' Contractors who are accordance with the engineer's estimate of the EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS' Blythe Ave., Highland, CA . , Code) .Statement Must be filed five years from the date it I declare that all information Code), . desirous of securing plans, Instruction to Bidders upon percentage of work Before acting .on this ' . ' '92346. ' Filing • . . .. before that time. was filed in the office of the in this statement Is true.and Filing . . specifications and proposal depositing the sum of completed. The CITY will application, .the CPUC • . This business Is conducted 04/25/02, 05/02/02, 05/09/02, The filing of.this statement County Clerk. A New correct. • • 4/18/02, 04/25/02, 05/02/02, • by An Individual. . does not of itself authorize 05/16/02 Fictitious Business Name S/:JONG W.CHI ,, • • e purpose of 75.00(non-refundablej for retain percent o. eac prow es an oppo um or fo for th $ • ' ' 10 f h 'd rt •ty-f - rms. I declare that all information SBS.:383930# the use in this state of a Statement must be filed This statement wes filed w' . preparing and submitting a each. set of documents, progress payment as receiving comments and, SBs'. ' ' proposal for this work may check made out of San security for completion of the protests. Because PG&E . in this statement is true and FiCtitious Business Name in the-County Clerk of,•m , before that time. " . , • correct. , • : . , . violation of the rights of The filing of this statement Bernardino County on rtil , . . . • so subject to. certain Bernardino' City: Unified balance of the work.At the believes that its request is r S/ANDRES DE LA TORRE FfCTITIOUS BUSINESS. another. under Federal, does not of itself authorize 2,2002. ' •...,,,--- • -- . • •,--•,.•3 C. 'It ons, I hereinafter School District; no cash. re t d f the noncontroVersial PG&E has ques an expense o ' This statement was filed with NAME STATEMENT State,or common law(See the use in this state of a 'The • reg.ist •nt(s). • stat• from the building Additional sets and sets to successful bidder;the CITY •asked that the application be . the County•Clerk of San ' File No.2002-046,43 . Section 14411 et seq., comineneed to t.,nsact ,4",.,--11 rr,'trb 1\TTI/cc:Ivry ' Servi: Department, 956 prime bidders May be will pay the amounts.so approved.without hearings. . Fictitious Business Name in 4..3 i."v.E,Ivi 1 in r_A 1 1 West tth Stre h d f h • d l• Aft • 'd ' any et San pure ase ,rom . t e retaine upon. comp iance er consi ering . . .. .Bemardino County on April The following person(s) is Business and Professions business under the titious, . . . , ic,a ion V I r 'of the rights of Bernal-. ., CA 92411. It is Engineer at a cost of$75.00 with the requirements of comments or protests,•the - 8,2002. (are)doing business as: -• Code). .. another. under...Federal, business name.,o, names • ' The ' registrant(s) PATRIOT IMAGE, 689•W. 04/18/02, 04/25/02, 05/02/02, listed above. n'' Not Liaar-.2.3-..".4.--i.t•-•,,,,t,I.,-,4 s g.y . . trOn I uggested that (nen-refundable) per set. If Public Contract Code CPUC will issue a decision. ... . .,.. . . ,.. . a e,or common aw ee St t I (S commenced to transact' 2hd"Street;San•Bernarclino;:'Q5/09/02'.11:,.•.,., ,.,i,' Applicable . potential . Klers acquire'a requested,t e Engineer will Section h ' ' • 22300 . d 'th Th t I I . ci ted b an , e . e ac ua pan a op y $ t' .,14411,. t ' 4.,, I, 1 A,.., ,,, , .,.', . ,k, . ec ion, . .. e seq., - 0'" NOTICE INVITING.SEALED* copy .of the' contraCt 'mail.Sets of Ooduments at an provisions of.the contract 'the .cPvc'r*f differ from 'business under the.fictitio4 -p024:10,(9,14408711K , .,,,,, „,-_,§ps-334;19# NOTICE-This Fictitious - . Business and ProfeSsions . 'r:--'-"'4 I. r''''BIDS FOR''" ' . •- — ` - - " I -*--CI d t rt " ' 1 h t' -- t d b PG&E documents prior te „the additiona nen-sefun able ocumen s pe aining. o w a is,reques e y . . . business name- or,names ','Angei„g„ cateneflp,,',,069';- •.- - - -'''' Code),.,I.,..:.1'\,I1 •.,i r ,' • Name, Staten.: t ,expires, ri, 1CONSTRUCTION'OF'''. - . ' - ' - - k• sf "•f '-tWe'''''($20 00) sant* f Sec rifle'. 'in its,application, and...may', mandatory.. Tbid job wal , ee , o nty• . u s i u ion o u s,. . . listed .above on-April 8,".:.Spruce St,,,RNersidC.,C4.":, ' ' •.• •,-p.i. ..,o,... five years fro, the.date.it. ,,,.0. , , . .., .• 2002: ,•.$407-..--...:... -, .:„-1.- ' .„. '''FICTITIOUS BUSINESS. i ing . SOUTH.HIGHLAND. so . they..,. n.'„familiarize .dollers per Set.check.made Bids must be prepared,.on .result„in, an .increase or . . ' was'fi e •in o ice.o- e- . (d' th ff f th NOTICE-This Fictitious: This-busin.ets,is.,conducted- .,_ NAME-STATEMENT'1. - 04/25/02, 05/02/02, 05/09/02, • - AVENCJEANCOUNIPER .. "themselves the project out to the Engineer . ,' the City provided.proPosal .decrease in• the revenue . County Cle . A -New • ' ' Name Statement expires by an individual, •. -.File No.2002-03821'' '05/16/02 ' Fictitious B -Mess .Name EWE STEM' ' '' • '' AVENUE S R SY . , This,.is, a "equirements Each bid must conform and forms and-completely filled request that will eventually . • • The' following person(s) is • ' •five years,from the date it I declare that all information • SBS-379,189# Statement List", be ,filed IMPROVEMENTS Contract:The ontract shall be responsive, to the out in conformance with the affect your individual rates. •, . , was filed in-the office of the- in this.statement is true and (are)doing business as:. before that e. . BID NO.SP•46-02• • be for six to elve month Contract Documenta and will Instructions'to Bidders and If you want more information . '• • County Clerk. A New correct . (1) ARCHETYPE. MULTI. • FICTITIOUS BUSINESS. Th f l' th' t t t e i ing is s a emen PUBLIC NOTICE IS periods.The I 'al estimated be'accompanied by the(1) all proposal forms must be to or send comments, . FictitiouS Business Narne .S/ANGEL E.CASTANEDA MEDIA, (2) SIDE-LINE NAME STATEMENT ' does•not itself authorize HEREBY GIVE tha the ' N t dollar value o' his contract Bid Bond or other security submitted in a sealed please write to: . . . • Statement'must be filed This statement was filed with MUSIC MAGAZINE, (3) File No.2002-04461 the use.' 'this state of a CITY OF FONTANA, as is .anticipate • to be referred to in the Contract envelope plainly marked on The Public Advisor• • ' before that time.' , • the County.Clerk of San REGENERATOR,. 26675 CITY;invites sealed bids for. $200 000 00 e District DocOments; (2) List of the outside "SEALED BID California Public .Utilities . The following person(s) is Fictitious :usiness Name in . The filing of this statement Bernardino County on April Lake Amador Lane, (are)doing busineSs as: violation of the rights of th above st t d • t d ' ' ' ' e . . a e pmdiec ,. an reserves the ri, t to award Proposed Subcontractors; FOR CONSTRUCTION OF Commission , . ''•does not of itself authorize, 10,2002. . . Arrowhead,CA 92352-1623; AMERICAN GROUP, another 'Under Federal, will receive such bi s in the all or part of t estimated (3) Noncollusien.Affidavit; SAN SEVAIRE CREEK 505• Van Ness Avenue, • . the use In this state of a The ., • PO ' registrant(s) . Box 1623, .Lake fficee of the Citv Clerk tin to contract'amoun and ma and . /41 Contracter's BIKE AND Room 5303• . . MATSUDA, 852 W. Walnut State, common law(See' ° . ,- - . . y . , . . . —. FiCtitious Business Name•in comnienced to transact Arrowhead,CA 92352. Ave.,Rialto,CA 92376;P.O. Sectio 14411 et seq., the nour of 10. renew 00 AM on the this cont ct amount Qualiffcation Statement. No RECREATIONAL' TRAIL, ,San Francisco,CA 94102 ' .. violation of the rights of business under the fictitious Patrice S. Mock, 26675 Box' ' 1294, Rancho Busin..s and Professions 23rd day of May, 2002, at in increments of , to twelve bidder may withdraw his bid BID N . , 0 SB-41-02 - DO cir via electronic mail to: . . :another under • Federal, .business name or names Amador,Lk.Arrowhead,CA Cucamonga,CA 91730.. Cod. '. - whic.h time they will be months per exte ion or add for a period of sixty (60) NOT OPEN WITH public.advisor@cpUc.ca.gov ' • State,or common law(See listed above on not 92352-1623. Armando S.Maliglig,852 W. First long ' , publicly opened and read. 'additional cont t dollar days.after the date set for REGULAR MAIL". _ Mention which application . Section .14411 et seq„, applicable.- ' • Robert, D. Mock; 26675 Walnut Ave„ Rialth, CA 04/1 02, 04/18/02. 04/25/02, aloud. , amounts for a maximum the opening or bids.. . ,. The CITY reserves the right you-are writing about and, . . . ' .Business and Professions NOTICE-This Fictitious Amador,Lk.Arrowhead,CA' 92376. . 05/ /02. . • The work of improvement period of fi years, The Owner has obtained to reject any or all bids,'to indicate if-yOu would like a . 'Code). • Name. Statement 'expires 92352-1623., . Dalisay R. Maliglig,852 W. •SBS-377608# consists of f. urnishin 'all rovided that th- 'bid oes from 'the Director..of the waive an irre ularit , to written res onse„.otherwise g P . d NI g. Y P • , • First Filing' • " five years from,the date it This.business is co. nductecl Walnut Ave., .•Rialto, CA . • materials, equipment, tools, 'not change e ept for Department of Industrial accept any bid or portion no reply will be sent, Your 04/25/02, 05/02/02,,05/09/02, was filed in the office of the by Husband&Wife 92376. • , . . labor, and. incidentals as inflationary • a lustments Relations . the .. general thereof,and to take . . all bids letter will be'sent to the • • : .05/16/02.• . County Clerk, A New I declare that all.information This business is conducted ICTITIOUS BUSINESS, required', by• the Plans, -which-may be a. roved by prevailing.rate of per diem under advisement "for a Commissioners and' wilt • ' . SBS-'384943# Fictitious BusinesS Name in this statement is true and by Husband&Wife, NAME STATEMENT Specifications and,Contract the District at its sole wages and,the general rate period of ninety five (95) become part of the formal . - Statement must be filed correc. •••I declare that all informat on ' • i File No 2002-04756 Documents,for the above discretion. This contract for holiday and overtime days. correspondence file for the " ' . . S/PATRICE MOCK ‘' . .. before that time. •• ' in t ' ' ' his statement is true and , e'following person(s) is stated.project.,The general shall not exeeed i total of work in the loco*in which At the time of contract felevant application. ' . ' - , , FICTITIOUS BUSINESS. The filin 1 th. t t t g•o' is s a emen . This statement was filed with • t - , . ...re)doing business as: items of work to be done $3,000,000.00. . • the wcirk is to be performed award, the prime FOR FURTHER , ' . . NAME STATEMENT does not of itself authorize the Cotinty Clerk of San S/DALISAY R.MALIGLIG RKO ' . TOWERS hereunder consist of the Each bid ,s .11 be for each craft, classification contractor shall possess a ,INFORMATION . . File No.2002-04328 the use in this state of a Bernardino County on March This statement was filed with ONTRACTING CORP.; construction of Clearing 8,- accompanied by t :security or type of work needed to Class "A" , Contractors You can. get more • • . The following,person(s) is Flctitiotis-Busineas Name in 25,2002. • .•/ the County. Clerk of San .599.Brook Drive, Rancho grubbing, construction of referred to in th, Contract execute, the Contract. License or a combination information from PG&E by . , . . (are)doing business as; •.iolatien'Of the'rights of The, - '.-'-registrant(s) Bernerdino.County on April ' Cucamonga,CA 91730. ' approximately 4,800 LF of 'Documents, a items Holiday rates.shall be paid of Class"C"license(s),as writing to:• 2002 Rate .. '• '• BILL'S SMOG STOP, 8435 Yanother' ''under• 'Federal, commenced to trans6ct 05,2002.' • ARKO Towers Contracting 10-inch vitrified clay sewer indicated in Secti. II,and a as specified in the,collective required to perform the Applications, PG&E, P.O. • Loma .Place, Upland, CA a e,or common aw ee St t I (S business under the fictitious The • . .registrant(s) Corp., CA,• 9599 Brook ,pipe,, manholes, and list, of .. ,•roposed bargaining• agreement .work,issued by the State Box 7442, San Francisco, . 91786,(909)579-1555. Section 14411 et seq., business name 6r names commenced to transact 'Drive, Rancho,Cubamonga, associated ,' trench subcontractors. ach bid applicable to each particu1ar of California. ,CA 04120.You may review . , William R. Gutzmann, 8435 Business and .Professions listed above on Jan 2002, business under the fictitious CA 91730. , excavation/recompaCtion, must include a• ompleted craft,.classification or type of BY ORDER OF CITY OF a.copy.of any of the PG&E • . Loma Place, Upland,'CA . , Code). r ' 'NOTICE-This Fictitious business name or name- This business is conducted and pavement Contractor's . ti alification work. emploOd on the . ., FONTANA ,- applications at Our corporate 91786. . First Filing • - Name Statement expires listed above on 04/05/2002. by a corporation 2425441. removal/restoration. . Statement,Sectl. X,pages protect,Copies of schedules Dated this 2nd day of April, headquarters (77 Beale This business is conducted. 04/25/02,'05/02/02 05/09/02, ,, five years from the'date it NOTICE-This Fictitiou• I declare thaf all information Copies . ' of ' Plans, 1 through 5;failu •to do so of rates so determined are 2002. ' Street, Room 3120, San . , by an individual. ' 05/16/02 . . was filed in the,office of the Name,. Statement exPire in this Statement is true and Specifications,and Contract will resuft in reje- ion of the on file at the Owner's CITY OF FONTANA - Francisco; CA 94105), any - . I declare that all information - . SBS-'383780# County Clerk. A New five years from the date correct. - ' Documents are available bid.' • • . Building Services Office and 8353 Sierra Avenue of our division officers,or a • in this statement is true arid Fictitious,-Business Name S/ IRAZMIK- ARKOIAN, froth the City.of Fontana Lace! and mino bidders are available to any Fontana,California 92335 the San Francisco office of . was filed in the office of th ' , correct. , , Statement must be filed County Clerk. A Ne Pres/SeciTreas ,, (city), at 8353 Sierra, are specifically e ouraged. interested party upon (909)350-7610 the CPUC. Mention the ' ' S/WILLIAM R.GUTZMANN FICTITIOUS BUSINESS before that time. • , Fictitious Business Na This statement was filed With Avenue, ' Fontana, District reserves e right to request, In accordance with 05/02/92,05/09/02 name .of the application , • . ' This statement was filed with NAME STATEMENT The filing of this statement Statement must be' fil:, the County Clerk of Sae California -.92335, (909) reject'any or a bids or to Section 1773.2' of the . SBS-388657# About., which you are '' the County Clerk of San File•No.2002-05104 does.not,of itself authorize Bernardino County on April 350-6792, upon payment of waive'any irre .larities or California Labor Code, the •' . • before that time.. ' -inquiring. . ' • , • , . Bernardino County on April. The following person(s) is the use in-this state of a The filing of this.statem. i 12;2002. , a Thirty-five Dollars informalities in 1 -bids or In Contractor shall post a copy ' Este aviso describe la - ,. 3,2002. - :. • (are)doing business as:' Fictitious Business Name in does not of itself authori - The • SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA • registrant(s) ($35.00),non-refundable fee the bidding. of the determination 'or .solicited de PG&E a la . .• . . The registrant(s) QWIK PAWN III, 1301 VV. violation of the rights of the use In this state of . commenced to transact ($45.00 If mailed).' Any District has o ained from prevailing rate of wages at REGIONAL RAIL • CPUC para cambios en las . 'commenced to transact 5th St,San Bernardino,cA another under Federal, Fictitious BusineSs Name business under the fictitious questions pertaining to this the, Director , of the each job site.The schedule . AUTH R 0 ITY . tarifas de electricidad y gas ' .• 'Name Statement expires Regina Pollock,693 Mosaic Filing' Business and Professio s ' TECHNICAL SUPPORT • . five years from the date it accompanied by a proposal this work is to e performed, shall be at time and one- • San Francisco, CA 94120... ' . businesa under the fictitious 92410,(909)884-0802' . State,or common law(See violation of the rights ,f business name or names project shoUld be directed to Department , ' Industrial of per diem wages is based „ natural,Para informacion en . , .business name or names Tarni S Boardman;_12168, 'Section 14411 et seq., 'another under Fede I, listed above on N/A. . George Harvilla, P.E. ,at Relations tl • general upon a working day of eight •!IFP NO.E726-03 espanol . sobre • este ' listed above chi 4/1/2002. Mt.' Vernon #73„ Grand Business, and' Professions State or"coMmorr law(S e NOTICE-This' ' Fictitious (909)427-9166. . , prevailing rat.- of per diem (8) hours. The rate for • prop0esta,por favor escriba' , • . • NOTICE-This Fictitious Terrace,CA 92313. ' ' Code). - Section 14411 et se . 19me ENGINEERING AND . Statement expires Proposal§. ' must be wages,in the : ality,where holiday and,overtime work a PG&E, P.O. Box 7442; . - . - . .five years tram the date it Circle,., .Oceanside, • CA 04/18/02,,04/25/02, 05/02/02, 'Code).1 - ' was filed in the office of the guarantee in the form of for each era or type of half.The Contractor and any FOR ROLLING STOCK •Att t' • 2002 R t en ion. , . a e . ' was filed in the.Office of the 92057. , ' ... ,05/09/02 - First Filing ' . '' COunty Clerk. A New cash, cashier's check, a workers need . to execute subcontraCtorts) shall pay ACQUISITIONS Applications." • • ' .- ' .County Clerk, A New This business is conducted ,. . - SBS-382202# , 04/11/02 04/18/02 04/25A '',,, Fictitious Business Name certified check.or bid bond the'contraet oPies of the not less than the'specified PacifiC Gas and, Electric ' . ' ' 'Fictitious Business Name by Co-Partners , Statement must be filed available to the CITY in the ascertained , ge rated are prevailing rates of wages to - ' REQUEST FOR • ' ' ' 05/02/02 . ' '' Conmany • .'Statement must be'filed I declare that all information ' • before that time. amPunt of at least' ten on file in the :istrict offices all workers employed by •PROPOSAL(RFP) 05/02/02 • - - . before that time. . in thid statement is true and FICTITIOUS BUSINESS. . SBS-37871 . The filing of this statement percent (10%)'of•the total and are ay. able to any them in the execution of the SBS-388503# ' The filing of this statement correct . NAME STATEMENT does not of itself authorize ,amount.bid. Any proposal interested pa 1 on request. contract. The Southern California does not of itself authorize S/TAMI BOARDMAN File No 2-04249 ,200. . FICTITIOUS BUSINESS the use in this state.of a, not accompanied by such a The successf bidder will be In accordance with RePional Rail Authority is . • the use in this state.of a This staternent was filed with The following person(s) is .. NAME 5TATEMENT Fictitibus Business Name in guarantee, will not be required to .ost a copy :provisions of Public Contract requesting proposals for NOTICE OF H . EARING " . Fictitious Business Name in the County Clerk of San (are)doing business as: File No.2002-04453- violation of- the rights of considered.A payment bond thereof at ea job site. Code Section •22300, Engineering and Technical Notice is hereby given that , . - . violation of the rights of Bernardino County on April TEREST . PRINCIPLE ' • IN • Su ort for Rollin Stock roceedin s have been . The following person(s) another under FedeMI, and a performance bond, It shall be , andatory.upon substitution of eligible and PP... g P.. g . 'another ' under Federal, 19,2002. INVESTMENT CLUB, 1500 (are)doing business as: .State,.or common law(See each iri an amount equal tO the Contrac r to whom the equivalent securities for any Acquisitions. initiated by, the Planning ,.,, . W.'Edgehill Rd. #28, San Commission of the City of State,or common law(See The: registrant(s) WATER & ICE CREA 'Sectron 14411 et seq., 100% of the total contract Contract is awarded, and monies withheld to ensure , - . ' ,Section 14411 'et seq., comMenced to transact Bernardino,CA 92405,(9.09) •8919 Sierra'Ave., Fontan Business and Professions amount, shall be required upon- any subcontractors performance under 'this RFP docurnents may be Ria , p ' Ito ursuant 'to the , , - Business and Professions business under the fictitious 882-3686. CA 92335(909)350-3808' Code). concurrently with the under him, o pay not less •contract will be permitted at obtained'via email from provisions.of State Planning : •Code). ' business name or names Bette Rader, 650 E. Kwang S Im,-3029 Villa Ct. Filing .. execution 'of the'contract than the s .Specified rates the request and expense of Metrolink's web ite , s Law Section 15202 of the• ' • First Filing . listed above on 04-01-2002. 'Hospitality Ln.,#150, San Highland,CA 92346 ' 04/18/02, 04/25/02, 05/02/02, and shall be in the form set to all wOr rs employed by the Contractor. , (wWw.metrolinktrains.com, . guidelines .that implement . . 0'4/25/02, 05/02/02;.05/09/02, NOTICE-This Fictitious Bernardino,CA 92408 This business is conducte. 05/09/02 ' " forth ,in the ' contract them in th execution of ttie EaCh prime bidder shall click.on ' "Contracting"), mail the California Environrriental • 05/16/02. • ' Name Statement expires Carol A.Rehm,1520 Padua by en individual . . SBS-375341# documents., ' contract, per. the possess at the time this • or in person RFP Quality Act (CEQA) for.the SBS-384247# five years from the date-it Ave.,Redlands,CA 92374 I declare that all information Any contract entered Into requirem: ts of Labor Code contract is awarded..an documents will be available purp , ose of Considering the • . . • Aleislia . : . Schechter- beginning April 26, 2002, adequacy of .a . Draft was filed in the office of the in this statement is true and pursuant to this notice will, Sections '70&1773. active Class B •General County Clerk.. A New Andreasen, 1212 Darlene correct. • . FICTITIOUS BUSINESS incor porate the provisions of Each bid ust conform and Builder Contractor's license and c • an be picked:up at Environmental Impact • . . . ' .• . FICTITIOUS BUSINESS Fictitious Business Name Court,Redlands,CA 92374 ,St KWANG S.IM , NAME STATEMENT • the State Labor Code. be re• onsive to the and a Class C-20 Air Metrolink's offices between Report addressing the . r . NAME STATEMENT' Statement must be filed Suzette Smith, ,11 •- This statement was filed with .File No.2002-04758 - Labor Code Section 1735 Contrac Documents and Conditioning Contractor's 8:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.,,at environmental ' impacts ; , File No.2002-04206 before that time. . - Tennessee . St. .#185, ,the'County Clerk of San he following person(s) is requires, ' that, no shall be ccompanied by the license pursuant to Public 700 South Flower Street,"'"' associated With the . ' . ' The following.person(s)'is The filing of this statement Redlands,CA 92373 Bernardino County on April re)doing business as: discriminAtion•be made in (1) Bi, Bond or other Contract Code Section Floor, ' Los Angeles, proposed construction of a . .' . .' (are)doing business as: does not of Itself aUthortie Donna Spears, 30183 05,2002 , ' NLACO ' 1NC,, 9434 the employment of persons securi referred to in•the 3300.The successful bidder California 90017-4101, 1,289,302 square foot • . 'MEGA BEAUTY SUPPLY, the use in this'state of a Centro Vista, HighIgnd, CA The" - registrant(s) S erfern Place, Rancho upon publig works because Contra, Documents;(2)tist must Maintain the active Attention: Janette 'Shew, warehouse distribution - • - . 225 Carousel. Mall, San Fictitious Business Name in 92346- - • comnienced• to. transact C ..monga,CA 91730. of the race,religious creed, of Pro: sed Subcontractors; status for the license telephone 213-452-0284. facility to be located on 65 , 7 " • .Bernardino,CA 92401,(909) violation of the rights of Jane Spies, 6563 Valinda business under tbe fictitious Sa :co Inc., CA, .9434 color, national origin, (3) N collusion, Affidavit; throughout the•duration of RFP documents are free if acres of land, situated.on ' 888-8212.- Ave.,Alta Loma,CA 91737 Sib:,,ern Place,• Rancho. picked up. Add a $25.00 the North side of Agua . ' another under Federal, business name or names ancestry,physical handicap, (4)C. rector's Qualification this contract . . James-Kim, 245 Fallbrook State,or common law(See. Linda M,'Rehm, 1500'W. listed above on N/A .Cuc. onga,cA 91730. medical condition, ,marital State -nt;. and -(5). A mandatory Pre-Bid Site ' mailing fee for the Authority Mansa Road,lying Westerly -,,. ..,... Ct,Redlands,CA 92373. Section 14411 et seq, Edgehill- Rd. #28, $ -a° 'NOTICE-This - Fictitious This . inesS is Conducted. status, or sex of such Aft i live Action Program. Walk-Through will be held at to mail -documents via of Riverside Avenue. . . This business is conducted B • d p f • ' Bernardino,CA 92405 by A C. 'oration 2425442. Federal Express (certified Notice is further given that . usiness an ro essions Name Statement expires persons,except as provided tqc: , .der may withdraw his Ertimerton Elementary - . by an individual. ' • Code). ' •1 Lorraine M. Rehm, 1520 five years from the date it ,I declar- at all information in Government •Code bid r a period Cf sixty(60) School on Friday, May 10, check, money order, or the-abeve matter has been . I declare that all information .First Filing • Padua Ave„,"Redlands, cA was filed in the office of the .in this sta. ent is true and Section 12940. Compliance da, after the date set for 2002, at 2:00 p.m. General company check only) .or set for public hearing before - . in this statement is true and .0 . 4/18/02, 04/25/02,.05/02/02, 92374 ' • County Clerk. A .hew correct. . With the preVailing•rates;of th:.pening of bids.. contract bidders and provide a Federal Express the City of Rialto Planning :- • correct. ' 05/09/02 - • Margaret A.' Almond, 2762 Fictitious B • usiness Name SANLACO II, . ..- wages and apprenticeship T Contractor to whom the subcontract bidders -are account number in lieu of Commission to be held en . S/JAMES KIM . Annapolis Circle, San S/• SAND ' LAVOIE, the mailing fee, Please fax Thursday,May 16,2002,At . . . . . . , . . . .. . . . , . . . • , . • . . . . • . . . . . . . . ' . . . , • . . . . . . , ' ' _ . . • . . , . . . . ' . . . . .,' . . . , -. . . . . ' . . ,•, . . . • • . ,, • -,_... _. . . _ . . . . - , . . . . -- , . . . . . . . ,. . , . . • . . . . . • . . , • . . , . . . , • , ...,. . . . . / , . . . • . . , . . . . , . , • , . • . . . . • .. . . . . . • . • . • . . ' • . . . . , . . • • . . . . . . . • , . -_, . .__ _ .. _._ _ __ . _ _ _ _ _ -___ ' : _ _ _ .__ ____._____________ ___.._____ _ __________. ' . . STOKES,CLAUDIA M(HWNVAL KIER,THOMAS N JR WILLIAM $N,..LINDA S MINIMUM BID:$3600 ORIVARCEL:0400233120000 MINIMUM BID:$5350 CURRENTASSESSEES: aireceia pr°ceccwn, au uuuyauu Inn ueUGlGuiu11 M. L,uuet, - MINIMUM BID:$4350 MINIMUM BID:$2650' • •WILLIAS4SON,JOHN P ITEM ND:90380635511340000• CURR T ASSESSEES:` • - ITEM NO:9741 3099341100090 ANDRES,ANTONIO G resquesta escrita a maquina Si no conoce a un abogado, First Filing , ITEM NO:87830632211190000 ITEM NO:88570632342020000 MINIMUM BID:$4000 CURRENT ASSESSEES: ROBIN N,JOHN A CRIG PARCEL:0402403020000 ANDRES,PERLITA 0 (lane qua cumplir con,las puede Ilamar a un servicio 05/02/02, 05/09/02, OS/16/02, - CURRENTASSESSEES: CURRENTASSESSEES: ITEMf10:89190633122200000 FRIEDLAND,STEPHEN ROBINS0)V,ANNY CURRENTASSESSEES: MINIMUM BID:$2100 apropiidas legates aereferenciadeayudaleg l OS/23/02 HODGMAN,TOM W STEWART,RICKY , C ENTASSESSEES: MINIMUM BID:$100- MINIMUM'OID:S100 • ROMERO,LUIS ITEM NO:9887 3131461020000- que Iadas a usteu quiere ( eaa oficina ri ayuda legal SBS-387164# U que la,corte escuche su (vea el directorio telefonico). WEADER,SHARON K '- STEWART,PAULA • , PA AGEORGE,PAUL, ITEM NO:90400635521040000• ITEM NO:9 03036381140000 MINIMUM BID:S100 CURRENT ASSESSEES: caso. Siii usted'no presennta The name and address of FICTITIOUS BUSINESS MINIMUM BID:$3900 MINIMUM BID:$3350 SCIIMIDT,DAN CURRENT ASSESSEES: • CRIG PARC0400233450000 . ITEM NO:9742 3099341170000 MOORE,JESS E su res uesta a hem o, the court is: (El Nombre y NAME STATEMENT ITEM NO:87840632211370090 - ITEM NO:88580632342030000 SOHMIDT;MICHAEL PAYNE,ALFREDJ • CURRENT AS SSEES: , • CRIG PARCEL:0402401010000 ' MOORE,MARILEE R puede perder el caso, y le direccion de la corte es) € pueden guitar su salario,su San- Bernardino County File No,2002-05128 CURRENTASSESSEES' CURRENTASSESSEES:. M�SELEY,CYNTHIA PAYNE,MADELINEM WEINER,THOM�4SJ CURRENTASSESSEES: MINIMUM BID:$120 dinero y otras colas de su Superior Court; Central ,The following person(s) is DAVEY,BILL BRUCE HOWARD E HANNON,THOMAS C III MINIMUM BID:$3000 MINIMUM BID:S4PO TRUST#0208 TEM ND:988931314610BD000 propfedad sin aviso Court, 351 N. Arrowhead (are)doing business as: MINIMUM BID:$4800 . MINIMUM BID:$100 4HANNON,JAMES M ,ITEM NO:90420635541030000 ITEM NO:9534 3936391270000 MINIMUM BID:S100 • ' CURRENT ASSESSEES: . adicional por parte:de la Ave., San Bernardino, CA DAVID PORTER ITEM NO:87850632212030000 ITEM NO:88590632352020000 , HANNON,PATRICKM CURRENTASSESSEES: CRIGPARCEL:O 351270000 ITEM NO:97433099341.180000 MOORE,JESSE corte. Existen otras 92415-0240. SERVICES, 23833•Scenic CURRENTASSESSEES: CURRENTASSESSEES: MINIMUM BID:$5350 MILLER,ROOSEVELTJR CURRENTASSESEES: CRIG PARCEL:0402401020000. MOORE,MARILEE R requisitos legates. Puede The name, address and Dr., Crestline, CA 92325, ANGL CORPORATION WATKINS,SAMUEL B TR SITEM ND:89200633122250000- MINIMUM BID:$100 ; ROBINSON,JOHN'�A ' CURRENTASSESSEES: MINIMUM BID:.$3650 qua usted quiera Ilamar a un telephone number .of (909) 338-6564; P.O. Box MINIMUM BID:$5050 WATKINS,MARGARET L TR CURRENTASSESSEES: ITEM NO:90460635571160000' ROBINSON,ANN Y,wi TRUST#0208 TEM NO:9891 3132031070000 obogado immediataniente. plaintiffs attorney;or plaintiff 695,Crestline,CA 92325. f Si no conoce a un'abogado, without an attorney;is: (El David J. Porter, 23833 ITEM ENTAS80632231120000 MINIMUM BID:$1500 REED,BURL W CURRENT ASSESSEES: MINIMUMBID:S100".; MINIMUMBID:S100 CRIG ENTAS:3103031130000 puede Ilamar a un servicio nombre, to direction y el Scenic Dr., Crestline,•CA ' CURRENTASSESSEES ITEM NO:88600632353020000 MINIMUMBID:$100 VOGT;HARRY E ITEM NO:9550 3038121040000 - ITEM NO:9744 3099351070000 CURRENTASSESSEES: de referencia de abogados o numero- de' telefono del 92325. FRESQUEZ,E J JR CURRENTASSESSEES: ITEM NO:89210633131010000 DOYLE:KIT III ' CRIG PARCEL:0403113320000' :RIG PARCEL::0402411030000 LAMB,WILLIAM F a una oficina de ayuda legal abogado del demandante,o This business is conducted MINIMUM BID:$100 ROBERTSON,TERRY #I CURRENT ASSESSEES: TAYLOR,GUY CURRENTASSESSEEsi-' CURRENTASSESSEES: MINIMUM BID$5750 '`' (yea el directorio tetefonico). del demandante que no by an individual. ITEM NO:8790 0632231310009 MINIMUM BID:$2050 • :SECOND MOUNT MORIAH MISSI DOYLE,SONDRA(JT-GUY) ZARCO,LUIS COLEMAN,FREDERICK B JR ITEM NO: 896 3132041050000 The name and address!of tiene ebogado,es) I declare that all-information CURRENTASSESSEES: ITEM NO:8861063235303000 MINIMUM BID:$16750 MC CARTY,LISA(JT-KIT)' MINIMUM BID:S11600', '' KOPECKY,EUGENE E ORIG PARCEL:3103041050000 the court is: (El Nombre.y Wolf,- Rifkin & Shapiro in this statement Is true and PETERS,THORNEJ '• CURRENTASSESSEES: :ITEMNO:89220633131160006 MINIMUMBID:$100 ITEM NO:95543038331090000 COLEMAN,,GLORIA HW-FREDE CURRENTASSESSEES: direction de la cortees)' 11400 W.Olympic Blvd. ml correct. ( SAN BERNARDINO Floor, Los Angeles, CA S/:DAVID J.PORTER ' MINIMUM BID:$5300 ROBERTSON,TERRY.. ICURRENT ASSESSEES: ITEM NO:9074 0646261280000 ' CRIG PARCEL04033917J40000 KOPECKY,LUCRETIA J(HW-E PHAM,QUANG COUNTY SUPERIOR 90064-1557,310/478 4100. This statement was filed with ITEM NO:87910632231320006 MINIMUM BID:$2050 'CURL,WILLIAM E SR CURRENT ASSESSEES: CURRENT ASSESSEESK' MINIMUM 81D:S100 TAKAI;RONALD T' COURT,351 N,Arrowhead DATE.(Fecha):Jun 29,2001 the County Clerk of San CURRENT ASSESSEES: ITEM NO:88620632353070000 ;MINIMUM BID:$3950 ' SHULAR;JULIE WILKERSON,GEORGE 01: . ITEM NO:9745 3099351100000 PHAM,MAI K(HW-QUANG) Ave., San Bernardino,'CA By: STEPHANIE M. Bernardino County on April MC WHIRTER,JOEL - CURRENTASSESSEES: ?ITEM NO:89230633131180000 MINIMUM BID:$2750 WILKERSON,GEORGE If) ' CURRENTASSESSEES: TAKAI,JUNE P(NW-RONALD) 92415;CENTRAL DIVISION LINDSEY, - Deputy 22,2002, MC WHIRTER,CHERYL ROGERS,JESS E CURRENT'ASSESSEES: ITEM NO:90850646371050000- MINIMUM BID:$9900 3• WHITE,EDDIE A JR MINIMUM BID:$2500 ' The name, address and (Delegado) - , The registrant(s) MINIMUM BID:$5200 ROGERS,.VIVIAN "CURL,WILLIAM E SR CURRENTASSESSEES: ITEM NO:955730385310r 000, WHITE,RITA J ITEM NO:9897 3132041060000 telephone', number -of (SEAL) 'commenced to transact ' ITEM NO:87930632231360000 MINIMUM BID:$100 `MINIMUM BID:$8350 GROSVENOR,JOHN J ,ORIG PARCEL:04032324 b00 MINIMUM BID:$4700 CRIG PARCEL:3103041060000- plaintiffs attorney,or plaintiff 04/18/02, 04/25/02, 05/02/02, business under the fictitious without an attorney, is:,(El 05/09/02 business name or names CURRENTASSESSEES: ITEM NO:88630632353100000 REM NO:89240633131230000 ' WIGHTMAN,BRUCE R'.' CURRENTASSESSEES:+ ITEM NO:97483099361280000 CURRENTASSESSEES: listed above on not nombre, la direction y el SBS-381993# FISHER,ALICEE- CURRENTASSESSEES: CURRENTASSESSEES: MINIMUMBID:$5600 SUDER,RUTHG r ORIGPARCEL:0402421140000 PHAM,QUANG numero de telefono del applicable, MINIMUM BID:$3850 BRUCE,HOWARD E :.CURL WILLIAM E SR • - 'ITEM NO:90860646371060000 MINIMUM BID:$3450 CURRENTASSESSEES 'TAKAI,RONALD T abogado del demandante,o NOTICE-This 'Fictitious ITEM NO:8794 0632232080006 ' MINIMUM BID:$100 MINIMUM BID:$4100 CURRENT ASSESSEES: ITEM NO:9558 3038531100000 TRUST#0208 PHAM,MAI K(HWQUANG) del demandante que •no ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Name Statement expires CURRENT ASSESSEES: ITEM NO:8864 0632353110000 • ITEM NO:8926063314131000'0 PACKARD,ROY R CRIG PARCEL:040323229 000 MINIMUM BID:$2500 ' ,TAKAI,JUNE P(HW-RONALD) tiene abogados es) FOR CHANGE OF NAME five.years from the date it PRELESNIK,JAMESE CURRENTASSESSEES:'. :CURRENTASSESSEE$: MINIMUM BID:$1300 'CURRENTASSESSEES: ITEM NO:97503099371230000 MINIMUMBID:513100 VICTOR S. • PALACIOS, Case No.SCV088516 was filed in the office of the ESO., SBN 55986, LAW Superior Court of California, County Clerk. A New ' MINIMUM BID:$100 - BRUCE,HOWARD E 1MASH,PETER) ITEM NO:90870646371070000 GLASBAND,ROBERT CURRENTASSESSEES ITEM NO:9898 3132041070000 County of San Bernardino. Fictitious Business Name -OFFICES OF VICTOR S. ITEM NO:87960632232170000 MINIMUM BID:$100 1AMASH,FAYE F CURRENT ASSESSEES GLASBAND,EDNA R BRYANT,OTIS C CRIG PARCEL:3103041070000 pALACIOS, 8554 Nuevq Petition of: HEATHER A: Statement must be filed CURRENT ASSESSEES: ITEM NO:88650632355030000 1MINIMUM BID:$3350 GROSVENOR,JOHN J MINIMUM BID:$3050 ' BRYANT,FRANCES CURRENTASSESSEES: Ave.,•Fontana, CA 92335", WHITNEY'for Change of before that time. NORTH HILLS CONST CURRENTASSESSEES: PTEM NO:89270633141320000 MINIMUM BID:$1400 ITEM N0:9564 306414103rf(' 0 MINIMUM BID:S100 PHAM,OUANG (909).356-9594 (909) 356- Name - The filing'of this statement MINIMUM BID:$100 G00D SHEPHERD CHURCH, CURRENTASSESSEES: ITEM NO:91080649331080000 ORIG PARCEL:040449123Q000 ITEM NO:9751 3099411160000 TAKAI,RONALDT - 9595 • • - TO. -ALL .INTERESTED does not of itself authorize ITEM N0:87990632241170000 THE MASH,PETERJ... ,• - CURRENT ASSESSEES: CURRENTASSESSEES. .'+ CURRENT ASSESSEES: PHAM,MAI K HW-QUANG PATE Fecha: Au - 07, PERSONS; the use in this state of a - CURRENT ASSESSEES: ' MINIMUM BID:$1450, ' Q ASH,FAYE F STEVENS,SCOTT BEAM,LARRY • x ` MINED,IRA W- '' TAKAL'JUNE P`NW-RONALp. 2001 ( ) 9-.;, Petitioner-filed a petition Fictitious Business Name in ( -) By: JULIA MARTINEZ, with this court.for.a decree violation of the rights of MINIMU R,JACK D ITEM N0:88660632355050000. MINIMUM BID:$5200' MINIMU S;EVELYN MINIMUMBID:S13500 ' N11NIMU BARBARA M MINIMUMBID:S26900 Deputy(Delegado) changing names es follows: another under Federal, , MINIMUM BID:$6350 CURRENTASSESSEES: I M NOr89280633141480000 MINIMUM BID:$100 ' ' " ITEM NO',95903066431140006 MINIMUM BID:S100 ITEM NO:99053132221010090 (SEAL) ' Heather Ann Whitney to State,or common law(See ITEM NO:88000632241310000' PATTERSON,THOMAS- RENT ASSESSEES:, ITEM ND:91100649333010000 ' CRIG PARCEL:0403291236000 ITEM NO:9753 3099421130000 ORIG PARCEL:3103081120000 05/02/02; : 05/09/02, Heather Ann• Realtiy Section 14411 et seq., /23/02 •i Whitney ' Business,and Professions CURRENTASSESSEES; PATTERSON,DELIGHT KUWITZKY,JACKD - CURRENTASSESSEES: CURRENTASSESSEES r CURRENTASSESSEES: CURRENTASSESSEES: 05(16/02;05 � The:Court orders 4hat all Code). KELLY,SANDRA MINIMUM BID:$3650 MINIMUM BID:$100 XANDER,EDWARD J AARON,ARTIE ESTOF . CAMACHO,ELIZARDO OVERLAND LAND FUND EIGHT , SBS-387108# The C interested th this Cost Fling MINIMUM BID:$3750 ITEM NO:88670632355060000 ' ITEM NO:89290633151050000' MINIMUMBID:$100 ' ' - MINIMUM BID:$5950 y; ', CAMACHO,GUADALUPE MINIMUMBID:S55200 matter shall appear before First ill OS/09/02, OS/16/02, ITEM NO:88010632241320000' CURENTASSESSEES: CO������222RRRENTASSESSEES:' ITEM NO:91120649343050000 ITEM NO:95973067471159006 MINIMUM BID:S100 ITEM NO:9910 3200381070000 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE this court 'at the hearing 05/23/02 CURRENT ASSESSEES: PATTERSON,THOMAS. HI tESERT LAND PARTNERSHI, CURRENT ASSESSEES: CRIG PARCEL:0401731031000' ITEM NO:9754 3099441040000 CRIG PARCEL:0457152280000 : FOR CHANGE OF NAME indicated below' to show , SBS-387129# - KELLY,SANDRA PATTERSON,DELIGHT MINIMUM BID:$4000 BITTLE,RICHARD T AND GEO, ' CURRENTASSESSEES:a, CRIG PARCEL:0402322040000 , CURRENTASSESSEES:. ' Case No.SCVSS088552•. cause, If any,'why the ' - • MINIMUM BID:$5900 - MINIMUM BID:$4000 ITEM NO:893'00633151140090 MINIMUM BID:$100 . ' ROSS,JAMES E , CURRENTASSESSEES: ELLIOTT,EDWARD T Superior Court of California, .petition for change of name FICTITIOUS BUSINESS ITEM NO:88020632242080000 ITEM NO:88680632355070000 CURRENTASSESSEES: ITEM NO:91380652041210000 MINIMUM BID:$7100 aJ MIKOWSKI,PATRICIAA ELLIOTT,PHOEBE County of San Bernardino. should not be granted. CAME STABUMENS CURRENTASSESSEES: CURRENTASSESSEES: LA,t^RDE,KARENP ' CURRENTASSESSEES:- ITEM NO:96103068311 90000 MINIMUM BID:$3050 MINIMUM BID:$1300 - ' Petition of:Crystal Sanchez Notice of Hearing:. 't 34 for Change of Name Date: 5-16-02, Time: 8:30 File No.2002-03247 NIXON,LOIS VTR PATTERSON,THOMAS •' MINIMUM BID:$3650 , • TOLOSA HOLDING CORP CRIG PARCEL:040137,70000 ITEM,NO:9755 3099441110000 ITEM NO:99113210121070000 'TO ALL INTERESTED A,M.,Dept.;S15. The following persons) is • MINIMUM BID:$7800 PATTERSON,DELIGHT ' 17E410:89310633161060000 MINIMUM BID:$900 CURRENT ASSESSEES, . CRIG PARCEL:0402322110000 ()RIG PARCEL:0458163120000 PERSONS: The address of the court is (are)doing business as: : ITEM NO:88030632242120000 MINIMUM BID:$4000 CURRENTASSESSEES: ITEM NO:91430653181280000 - MC DORMAN,SHERIL'iC CURRENTASSESSEES: CURRENT ASSESSEES: Petitioner Crystal Sanchez 351 N. Arrowhead, San WILLOW&REED BASKET CURRENTASSESSEES: ITEM NO:88690632355080000 ANDREWS,ROGER F CURRENT ASSESSEES: ' MINIMUM BID:S11200`•,' - TRI-JAN PETERSON,IRL L filed a petition with this court Bernardino,CA 92415. COMPANY, '317 W. State - STEVENSON,JAMES C CURRENTASSESSEES:., MINIFSUM BID:$100 BROWN,EDWARD J - ITEM NO:96133068311280000' ; MINIMUM BID:S100 - BRYANT,CHARLESF for a. decree changing' A copy of this,Order to Show Str 92373uite A, Redlands, - MINIMUM BID:$4250 - PATTERSON,-THOMAS ITEM t10:89320633161130000 MINIMUM BID:$1900' ORIG PARCEL:0401444080000 ` ITEM No:97573099441310000' MINIMUM BID:$8050 ' '' names as follows: Cause shall be published at Susan W; Thornes, 4251 ITEM NO:8804 0632242180000 PATTERSON,DELIGHT CUR NTASSESSEES: ITEM NO:91740657191050000 CURRENTASSESSEES: CRIG PARCEL:0402322310000 ITEM NO:9913 3210161010090 Manssa Raylene Camberes least once.each week for . to Marissa Ra lene Sanchez four successive weeks rior Quail •Cyn Rd„ San . CURRENTASSESSEES: ' MINIMUM BID:$3650 FUNKSJRSULA C CURRENTASSESSEES:. 'GARDINER,WALL/tUE L CURRENT ASSESSEES: , CRIG PARCEL:0458202010000 The Court orders that all to the date set forhearing on Bernardino,CA 9241:3. - • . - HOLGUIN,ENEDINA ITEM NO:88700632355090000 MINIMl1M BID:$100 GOODWIN,GUY L CO GARDINER,CLAR/SM STRICKLANO,JAMES C CURRENTASSESSEES: persona interested in ,this the petition'in the-following Melanie- J. Harriss, 1212 - MINIMUM BID:$6850. CURRENTASSESSEES: . ITEM Nb:89360633181120000 JOHN HAZARD&SONS,INC ' MINIMUM BID:$4450 •- MINIMUM BID:S100- . TRI-CONTINENTAL RESOURCES matter shall a pear before newspaper • of'"- general Garretson Ave.,Corona,CA ITEMN0:88050632242240000' NUNEZ,MIGUELL CURRENJTASSESSEES:-. .. MCGAUGH;WG'' , - ITEM NO:96183 68391020000 ITEM NO:97583099441430000' MINIMUMBID$3250• ., ' • this court 'at'the hearing 'circulation, printed'in"this 92879, . CURRENT ASSESSEES:• NUNEZ,LUZ ' ' WALLA E,DWIGHT L LENZ,ALICE G CRIG PARCEL: 01024140000' CRIG PARCEL:0402322430000 ITEM NOi 9914 3210161080006. indicated' below''to''show county:The Sun " This business is conducted RECKER,JOHN MINIMUM BID:$100 WALLA ;PATRICIAA' GWERDER-CAROLINE G' CURRENTAS'SSEES: `- , CURRENTASSESSEES: ORIG PARCEL:0458202080000 ,cause,, if.any, -why ,the Date:Apr,05,2002 by a general partnership. etition for.chan a Of name JAMES A.EDWARDS • I declare that all information MINIMUM BID:$100 ' ITEM NO:88710632361030000 ITEM N F'BID:$25006 • .MINIMUM BID:$800 •;. ADAMS DEV OPMENT& STRICKLAND,HANNAH C' CURRENTASSESSEES:'- " should not be granted. Judge of the Superior Court. in this statement is true and. ITEM NO:88060632242250000' CURRENT ASSESSEES: 'ITEM NO }9370633181160000 ITEM NO;9194 0659263570000 ENGIN STRICKLAND,JAMES C BALDOVINO,NENITA 0 Notice of Hearing: - 04/11/02,.04/18/02, 04/25/02, correct. ' '.CURRENT ASSESSEES:- ROGERS,JESS E . ' CURRENh�+SSESSEES: CURRENT ASSESSEES: MINIMUM Bj $5100 MINIMUM BID:$6050 BALDOVINO;PATRICK C'' Date:.5-29-02, Time: 8:30 05/02/02 - S/SUSAN THORNES PRIMISING,RUTH M TR ROGERS,VIVIAN . STEINIGEI�t AMES L - - RANDLE,JOE L - - ITEM NO. 6213069031070000 ITEM NO:9760 3099501070000 MINIMUM BID:S100 a.m.,Dept.:S-15 . SBS•378782# This statement was filed with MINIMUM 81D:$100 MINIMUM BID:$100 MINIMUM BI $6100 ' ' MINIMUM BID:$900 - -' ' CRIG P• CEL:040f015030000 CRIG PARCEL:0402241640000 ITEM NO:9924 3210251020000 The address of the court is ' the County-Clerk of San'- ^ ITEM NO:88070632242270000 ITEM NO:887306323620$0000 TEM NO:89 ,633181270000 TEM NO:91950659263580000 CURB'TASSESSEES: CURRENT ASSESSEES: CRIG PARCEL:0458204430000 351. N, Arrowhead,' San Bernardino County on March Bernardino,CA. 13,2002. CURRENTASSESSEES: CURRENTASSESSEES CURRENT ASSE SEES: CURRENTASSESSEES? . FOLk AHL,JANICEM THOMAS,DENISR CURRENTASSESSEES The registranl(s) A copy of this Order to Show FICTITIQUS SERAFIN,ARMAND BRUCE;HOWARD E HEARD,GEORGE� AND MAR) BICKFORD,ANDREW - MI MUM BID:$750 - VALENCIA,SALVADOR LEE,YOUNG C commenced' to transact " Cause shall be published at SERAFIN,JERI E MINIMUM BID:$100 MINIMUM BID:$3000*y, MINIMUM BID:$900 ITEM NO:96273069451140000 THOMAS,VIVIAN D(HW DENT LEE,JOHN J least once each week for business under the fictitious SERAFIN,JERI E(HW ARMAN ITEM NO:8874 0632363030000 ITEM NO:89410633191 00 ITEM NO'.92261000076290000 CRIG PARCEL:0403701250000 VALENCIA,SOCORRO(HW SAL LEE,YOUNG JA four successive weeks prior. BUSINESS business name or names SERAFIN,ARMAND. CURRENT ASSESSEES: CURRENT ASSESSEES: rw CURRENT ASSESSEES: ' 1CURRENT ASSESSEES: MINIMUM BID:,$6250 MINIMUM BID:$3950 to the date set for hearing on 20ed,above on January'1, MINIMUM BID:$4250 ANDERSON,RODNEY A' - CARDINAL,CLAYTON D ``'9Vl E,MARIE eV, ANDERSON,MELVIN ITEM N0:9762 3099501160000 ITEM NO:99383210361060000 the'petition in the following NAVIES NOTICE-This Fictitious ITEM NO:88080632253030006 MINIMUM BID:$1800' CARDINAL,ISABELA MININf(7M'8i1Y6190w' ANDERSON,CAROL CRIG PARCEL:0402241740000 CRIG PARCEL:0458175380000 newspaper of general Name Statement. expires circulation, printed in this CURRENTASSESSEES: ITEM N0:8876063237118000 MINIMUM BID:$4300 TEM N0:92421006C81010000 MINIMUM BID:S100 CURRENTASSESSEES; CURRENTASSESSEES: five years from the date it ' county:Sun News Paper WARREN,LOU A- CURRENTASSESSEES: ITEM NO:89420633201010000 CURRENT ASSESSEES ITEM NO:9628 3.06945115000 LAMBDIN,GEORGE A CHUNG,IN SUN. was filed In the office of the Date:SA.E,WA2 ..NAMEST TEMNESS. WARREN,CURTIS R AHARONI,MOISHE CURRENT ASSESSEES: � ENTERPRISE PROPERTIES LP CRIG PARCEL:0403701260000 LAMBDIN,JOANNE MINIMUMBID:$2850' JAMES A.EDWARDS ..NAME STATEMENT County Clerk. A. 'New MINIMUM BID:$4250 - MINIMUM BID:$100 JOINTER,STANLEY S II MINIMUM BID:$500 CURRENTASSESSEES: ` MINIMUM BID:$7750 ITEM NO:99393210371030000, Judge df the Superior Court.: •'File No.2002-04906 Fictitious Business Name. ITEM NO:8813 0632253280000 ITEM N0:8878 0632371270000 JOINTER,ISIS L ITEM NO:92451007051240000 SANGRE,PETER J ITEM NO:9763 3099511060000 CRIG PARCEL:045837-1460000,.. 04/18/02, 04/25/02 05/02/02, The•following person(s) is Statement must he.,,filed CURRENT ASSESSEES: ' CURRENT ASSESSEES: JOINTER,ZEENA M , CURRENT ASSESSEES:.- SANGRE,CLAUDINE CRIG PARCEL:0402241360000 CURRENTASSESSEES: - 05/09 02:. (arel doing business as:: before that time. FARLEY,BRUCE .. , .' DINIRO,MICHAEL A MINIMUM BID:$3450 .. COLE,LEARTRIS - MINIMUM BID:5100 CURRENT ASSESSEES: COPING;FELICITOVC'_' " "•SBS.362057# BETTER-'' - BITTERS The filint! of this statement - FAORO;STEVE A -- MINIMUM BID:$6200 ITEM NO:89430633201230000' MINIMUM BID:$1400` - ITEM NO:9640307014121000-- BRYANT,LESLIE C FLORES;CAROCINA'V """' ' " BREWING SUPPLIES+•719 doe use(inftit self autho ize FAORO;NANCYR(HW-STEVEN ITEM NO:88790632371280000 CURRENTASSESSEES: ITEM NO:92531011341050000. CRIG PARCEL:04636612700000 BRYANT,CHARLESF PADERNAL,LUZB- CITATION-FREEDOM, Wedgewd, Avenue, Apt. Fictitious Business Name in ' D,Upland,CA 91786;PMB FARLEY,JANETE(HW-BRUCE= CURRENTASSESSEES: SANDERSON,ROBERTC .CURRENTASSESSEES:,.:- CURRENTASSESSEES MINIMUMBID:5100 MINIMUMBID$2200 , FROM_PARENTAL. #336, P.O'."'BoX'"'8800, violation of the fights of MINIMUM BID:$5600 . GARCIA,EVELIO D . MINIMUM BID:$4350 WIDLE,MARIE- - -• , AARON,ARTIE-EST OF ITEM NO:9765 3099521170000 , CUSTODY,AND CONTROL Corona;CA 92878-6800:'' another under Federal, ITEM N0:882006322724.00000 WARD,BONNIE L ITEM NO:8946 0633211200006 MINIMUM BID.$100 MINIMUM BID:S15950 ' CRIG PARCEL:0402241520000 PUBLISH 4/18,4/25,5/2/02 (ABANDONMENT RE:• David "Allen"'SzeVin,,'719 State,or common law(See ' CURRENTASSESSEES: MINIMUMBID:$100 CURENTASSESSEES: ITEM NO:9266101343.1110000 ITEM NO:96453070531060000 ' CURRENTASSESSEES: #380954 CaseNoPSA-01256 Wedgewood Avenue, Apt. Business lad1Professions ANDERSON,JOHN R TR ITEM NO:8880 0632371300000 THERRIEN,ALBERT J - CURRENT ASSESSEES: ' CRIG PARCELi0403211660000 RAM-TECH FINANCIAL D,Upla lance Navarr Superior Court of California, Olga Blanca Navarro, 719 Code). .M NIMUM BID$100LYNF TR WAMBAUGH,ROBING TEM ND:894 0633211420000 STEINKE,;CAROLYN K R , DOYLEN ENNIS'SSEES: ITEM N0:9766 3099601060090 ' TITLE:of SaOBe• CASE 0 Upland, Avenue, Apt: 05/02/62, 05/09/02, - ITEM NO:88210632272500000 WAMBAUGH,HAZEL M CURRENT ASSESSEES: MINIMUMBID:$100.•. GONTHIER,GERARD A CRIG PARCEL:0402262460000 (ABBREVIATED) IN THE TTh spbu ness is7conducted 05/16/02,05/23/02 . CURRENT ASSESSEES: - - MINIMUM BID:$4150 PERSON,DENISE F ITEM NO:92761016541020000 DOYLE,JOAN H(HW/DENNIS) CURRENTASSESSEES: - MATTER OF b A General Partnership. SBS-387118# ANDERSON,J ROBERT TR . .ITEM NO:88810632371360000 - MINIMUM BID:$100 CURRENT ASSESSEES:'- ' GONTHIER,TRACEY L(HW/GE MOORE,JESS E BUSINESS INDEPENDENT ADOPTION I declare that all Information OF WYATT ' JAMES in this statement.ls true and ANDERSON,MARILYN F TR CURRENT ASSESSEES: - ITEM NO:89530633221230000 LEYERLY,TOMMY MINIMUM BID:$6500 MOORE,MARILEE R - ROBERT STALCUP FICTITIOUS BUSINESS ' I .'MINIMUM BID:$100 HINES,TOM CURRENT ASSESSEES: LEYERLY,DIANE(NW TOMMY) ITEM,NO:9647 3071111030000 MINIMUM BID:$5900 -A Persons who shall be Correct NAME STATEMENT' • , S/DAVID A,SZEVIN File No, pens 17 ITEM N0:8822 0632281090000 HINES,KAREN PRICE,EDGAR 0 SOUTHWEST CALIF PROD CO A ORIG.PARCEL:0464012830000 • ITEM NO:9769 3100421100000' NOTICE OF APPLICATION declared free from the This statement was filed with The followin arson CURRENT ASSESSEES: MINIMUM BID:$6300 PRICE,WILMAA STAMPFL,WILLIAM J SR(HN!- CURRENTASSESSEES: CURRENTASSESSEES: TO custody and control of his g i P (:- i- WHYTE,CATHARINE R ESTATE ITEM NO:88820632371380000 MINIMUM BID:$100 STAMPFL,BERTA(HWWILLIA VIKING RUN BASHOURA,JOSEPH SELL ALCOHOLIC • parents the rdi my a my of San, Mre)doing business as: ' MINIMUM BID:$9850 CURRENTASSESSEES: - ITEM NO:89540633221280006 RANNIS,PHILIPA ' BLOOM,BARBARAKTR DERYCZ,PETERV BEVERAGES THE PEOPLE OF THE Bernardino County on April, MEDICAL CLAIM7 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 16,2002 ASSISTANCE, ncho ITEM NO:882306322812.80000 WERNER,ROBERTATR CURENTASSESSEES: RANNIS,THERESA(NWPHILI MINIMUM-BID:$9750 MINIMUMBID:510850 The ' reglstrant(s) Dickens Ct., Rancho ' CURRENTASSESSEES: SHEPARD,NINATR MJRHOLDINGSINC. ' ,STAMFFL,WILLIAMJSR ITEM NO:96893096511030000,. ITEM NO:97703100431030000 Date of Filing Application: To Bernisha Stalcup and to commenced 'to transact Cucamon a,CA91730. , A n129,2002 all persons claiming to be g PANKEY,DANA&RUTH E 198' MINIMUM BID:$100 • MINIMUM BID:$2350 __ STAM?FL;BERTA(HW WM SR) CURRENT ASSESSEES:- -: CURRENTASSESSEES: P the father or-mother'f•said business,under,the„fjctjtious Bonita Waddington, ncho MINIMUM BID;$5050... ITEM NO:88830632371390000 ITEM NO:89590633241260000. GLASS BILLJ - •,. IGOROT VILLAGE INVESTMENT HARRISON,STEPHEN „ The'' Name sY,"bcernlhe minor persona) above ,business,,p,q,( qr j,,oes Dickens Ct., Rancho, ( ,,,,I, hated,ahove,gn,N/H ' Cucamonga,CA 91730. ITEM N0:,8827,0632281400600i CURRENT ASSESSEES: CURRENT ASSESSEES -• GLASS;DELORES F - ' MINIMUM BID:$7450 " HARRISON,CARLA A licant(s)is/are "• "named NOTICE.Thts..,.,,•Fictitious ' ___., PR , bhis business is conducted .CURRENTASSESSEES:- -�i DOWNING,HAROLDK .. FRIEDLAND',STEPHEN MINISIUMBID'$100 ITEl.7NOr9690309651f040000' -MINIMUMBID:-$780 FLbRESANITA,'?; BY order oYthis-Caurt;rybu Name ,S,fatelrlent,,,,eXplres b anindividual.. MARRON,DOUGLAS L DOWNING,WILLIAM E II - •MINIMUM BID:$100 - '-" ITEN NOS 92831017231380000; CURRENTASSESSEES`."-' , ITEM NO:9784 3101021210000 The applicarifs listetl above are -hereby---cited and ^fiYe„:eats_frOrp the.date;It y advised 'that'you- may I declare that all information MARRON,MARLENE•M •..:•., DOWNING,AMALIA(SRHAROL ITEMN0;8962063325111000k' .ORIGPARCEL:101723103000 IGOROTVILLAGEINVESTMENT CURRENTASSESSEES: are .applying: 'to" 'the was filed in the office of,the in this.statement Is true and- MINIMUM BID:$4100-•: ' • MINIMUM BID:$100 CURRENT ASSESSEES •, CURRENTASSESSEES.,. -'' MINIMUMBID:$7450-- ', LOZANO,GILBERTO•S, Depasment, pf Alcoholic appear before the,-Judge County--Clerk, A New Correct. Beverage Control to. sell Presiding in Department,S• 'Fictitious- Business Name S/BONITA•WADDINGTON' ITEM NO:88280632281470000' ITEM NO:8885 0632371410000 CARREL,SCOTT E ' -' CALDWELL,JOSEPH P ' ITEM NO:9691309651.1050000: MINIMUM BID:SIC° alcoholic beverages.at: 16 located' at 351' N. Statement .must be filed This statement was filed with CURRENT ASSESSEES: ' CURRENT ASSESSEES;. CARREL,PATRICIA S. CALDWELL,BEVERLY J ' CURRENT ASSESSEES: ITEM NO:9787 3101281050000 507.S.MT VERNON Arrowhead Avenue; San before that time. the County-Clerk'of San :LARK,FRANK E SAYLES,SCOTT d MINIMUM BID:$5350 MINIMUM BIDi$100 GOROT VILLLAGE INVESTMEN CURRENT ASSESSEES: C - Bernardino,CA 92415-0210 The filing of this'statement Bernardino County on April CAMPBELL,DOROTHY.A,,. SAYLES,MARK W ITEM NO:89760633301670000: ITEM NO:93601049121280000 MINIMUMBID:$7450 BAXENDALE,WANDA, - SAN BERNARDINO of the.above-entitled court does not of itself authorize 08,2002. , -CLARK,JAMES P SAYLES,KEITH E CURRENT ASSESSEES:` CURRENT ASSESSEES: ITEM N0:9692 3096511060000 MINIMUM BID:$3600 ', CA 92410 on May 17, 2002 at 1:30 the use in this state of-a .The registrants) BOTSFORD,VIRGINIA .MINIMUM BID:$3350 'FERGUSON,MELVIN L OLIVER,THOMAS M CURRENTASSESSEES: ITEM NO:97933101591060000 Type of license)s) Applied p.m. of that day, then and Fictitious Business Name in commenced to transact CLARK,VIRGINIA E SP-FRA ITEM NO:8886.0633021070000 FERGUSON,JEANE C OLf/ER,0 GERALENE GOROT VILLAGE INVESTMENT CURRENTASSESSEES: , fof there to show cause,if any violation of the rights of business under,the fictitious ( 41-ON-SALE BEER AND you have;why said person another under Federal; business name or names MINIMUM BID:$100 CURRENTASSESSEES: MINIMUM BID:$100 MINIMUM BID:$4300 MINIMUM pp1,, .., CHANG,YUN KI WINE-EATING PLACE should not be declared free State,or common law(See listed above on N/A. ITEM NO:88290632281480000. FILES,ANN MARIE ITEM NC:89810633321130000 ITEM NO:93681049353000000 1 04��00000% MINIMUM BID:S15750 ' 05/02/02 . from the control of his Section 14411 et seq.; NOTICE-This Fictitious CURRENT ASSESSEES: . MINIMUM BID:$100 CURRENTASSESSEES: CURRENT ASSESSEES: ./' ORIG PARCEL:0456301210000 t, ITEM NO:98023102371240000 SBS-388519# parents according to the Business and Professions Name Statement. expires CLARK,FRANK E ITEM NO:8888 0633021220000' FRAZAR,ROBERT S TR MARTINSON,RICARD CURRENT ASSESSEES: '• CURRENT ASSESSEES: petition on file herein, Code). five years from the date it . CAMPBELL,DOROTHY A . CURRENTASSESSEES: ' ' MINIMUM BID:$1500 MINIMUM BID:$8209. HIGH DESERT RANCH . 'KARAKY,BOB K If the Court finds that the Filing was filed In the office of the interest of the minors) 05/02/02, 05/09/02, 05/16/02, CLARK,VIRGINIA E(SP-FRA • VUNKOWSKI,JOSEPH ITEM NO:89960635031010000 ITEM NO:9369104 53100000 PROPERT MINIMUM BID:S10150 County Clerk: A New requires his ar her 05/23/02 ' CLARK,JAMES P VUNKOWSKI,CATHERINE L CURRENT ASSESSEES: ,CURENT ASSE EES: B AND B PARTNERS ITEM NO:9809 3103191020000 protection; the Cou f shall Fictitious Business Name BOTSFORD,VIRGINIA C MINIMUM BID:63450 PANGBURN,ADRIANNE M MARTINSON,R HARD MINIMUM BID:$6800 - CURRENTASSESSEES: CIVIL appoint counsel to represent SBS-388256# Statement must be filed : MINIMUM BID:$100 ITEM NO:88910633021300000 MINIMUMBID:$16600 MINIMUM BID; 5300 ITEM NO:97053097301050000, BO1' IN,MARK H - the minor(s),',Such,counsel before that time. ITEM N0:88300632281490000. ,CURRENTASSESSEES; ITEM NO:89970635031260000' The filing of this statement ITEM NO:93Z-104935311000, CURRENTASSESSEES ' MINIMUM BID:$2500 • shall be appointed whefher FICTITIOUS BUSINESS'; Thes.not of itself authorize CURRENT ASSESSEES CUSKEY,MICHAEL CURRENT ASSESSEES .,::, CURRENTA ESSEES•..• .-• •RKSS ASSOCIATES INC,'-:••• ITEM N0:9810 319319112000 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE or not the:rrunor(s)isiable to • NAME STATEMENT , the use In this state of a CLARK,FRANKE^' "' ' CUSKEY,LAURA FERGUSON;JAMES0MRS'-'1 MARTINSO ICHARD.'''-''I MINIMUMBIDr$3850 'i,^!'-•' CURRENTASSESSEES:._ FOR CHANGE OF NAME ",aftgicIPOYionl.,lf,y9.4.apPepr ,,,,..:,.FileNo,2002-05372„: Fictitious Business Name in without,.counsel.,and,,are The-following person(s) is CAMPBELL,DOROTHY,A" MINIMUM BID:$2400 MINIMUM BID:$100 MINIMUM Bib:$4550""'""'' ITEM N09708309731106000' BELLFLGWER LIMITED Case No:SCVSS'089283 violation of the.-rights of CLARK,VIRGINIA E SP-FRA. , ITEM ND:88930633031170000 TEM NO:89980635031270000: ITEM NO: 711049353120000, CRIG PARCEL:0456.17430000: MINIMUM,.ID:$2500- p unable to,afford.,counsel,the are)doin business as;:. Su erior'Court'of Califorhia, another under Federal, ( Court shall appoint counsel V.P RANSPORT•179 CLARK,JAMESP.,: CURRENTASSESSEES: CURRENTASSESSEES: CURRENTiASSESSEES:., CURRENTASSESSEES - ITEMNO: 813310323113000 Coition-SanBernardino.` for ou if ou reuest West FramerSt.,Rialto,CA State,or common law(See WEENING'for'Chsn 6 EL y y - ,,, Section 14411 et seq., MI IMUMRBID:$100NIA C RRAAYMONDO ROSEMARY M NIMUM BID A OOS D MRS' INIMU -BIDR1 60RO MINIMUM BID:$920 R ARRENBT%)SSESSEES: Petition op M'nge of The-purposeuof this action,. Muot6 V Phan; 179 West Business and 'Professions $ S4 Name to free the minor(s)from the Fromer -St., Rialto 'CA Code). ITEM NO:8831063228150WOO RAYMONDO,ROBERT J ITEM NO:89990635641110000 ITEM NO 9374104946117000 ITEM NO:970730973,1107000 MINIMUM BID,S44950 ' TO ALL INTERESTED Filing custody of his option(s);is to 92376, CLARK,FRANK E SEES: IMUM B D$3050.ARY GATES FREDRECKLES CARTES ALVIN J SEES: CU RENT ASSESSEES310000 CURRENTASSESSEES06000 petIttionerSMichael'Weeping Permit the adoption of•said This business is conducted OS/23/02' OS/09/02, OS/16/02, minors) to a suitable by An Individual. CAMPBELL,DOROTHY A ITEM NO:88960633001450000 MINIMUM BID:$400' C INiMI,,J D:$52 NE M ' STEPHENS,LESTER SHALOM MALI LP filed a petition with this court ado tins parent. I declare that all information SBS-387110# :LARK,VIRGINIA E(SP-FRA CURRENTASSESSEES ITEM N0:90040635061580000 MINIMIjM BID:$520 STEPHENS,MARY L MINIMUM 81D:$ 50 for a decree changing Thep Court may continue in this statement is true and names as follows: ' ' BOTSFORD,VIRGINIA C• M NIIMUUM BID$00Y A LATTIN,R BERT W ES. CU R NT ASSES EES:20000 ITEM N0:9709 30974210-30000 CRIG P�C8EL:04 341470000 Michael Nix. Weeping to exceedpthirty (30)sdays, as S/rMUOT VAN PHAN - ' FINAME STATEMENTS Michael Nix: necessary to appoint This statement was filed with File No.2002-04481 MINIMUM BID:$100 ITEM NO:889706330413'3000 MINIMUMBID:$00 CARTER,ALVIN J '()RIG PARCEL:0456153360000 CURRENT ASSESSES The Court orders that all ITEM NO:88360632281610000 CURRENTASSESSEES: ITEM NO:9080635071570000 CARTER,JOSEPHINE M ' CURRENTASSESSEES: STERLING BUILDERS INC persons interested'In this. counsel and enable counsel the County Clerk of San The following person(s) is CURRENT ASSESSEES FRIEDLAND,STEPHEN CURENTASSESSEES: MINIM M BID:$14350 ESAR INC MINIMUM BID:S9$500`, - matter shall.appeal before to become familiar with Bernardino County on April (are)doing business as this court at the hearing these proceedings. • 25,2002, CURTIS PROMOTIONS, GONZAGA;NAPOLEON R ' MINIMUM BID:$100' COELHO,GARY H ITEMiNO:93771049591280000 MINIMUM BID:$5750 ITEM NO::9829 31040 103000 - tndicated below to show Given under my hand and The registrant(s) 13619 Soper.Ave„ Chino, ' GONZAGA,JULIET C . ITEM NO:8898 0633051110000 MINIMUM BID:$1650 .CURI},ENT ASSESSEES: ITEM NO:9710 309742106000 •ORIG PARCEL:045534;530000 seal of the Superior Court of commenced to transact CA 91710;.P.O, Box'2830' MINIMUM BID:$2350 CURRENTASSESSEE§: ITEM N0:90110635081250000 MARF)NSCN,R S CRIG PARCEL:0456153370000 CURRENTASSESSEES cause;. o any, why the the County- of San business under the fictitious Chino Hills,CA 91709. ITEM NO:8837063228164000. FERGUSON;RODNEY A ' CURRENTASSESSEES; ., MINIMUM BID:$2300 CURRENTASSESSEES: STERLING BUILDERS It�tC - shouon for change of name Bernardino, State of business name-or names Laurette Barbara Curtis, shoice of ea granted. California,this Mar 2T;2002, listed above on N/A,- , 13619 So er 'Ave„ Chino, ' - CURRENTASSESSEES: MINIMUM BID:$4150 CRAWFORD,DANIEL C ITE010:9382105044161000 ESAR INC MINIMUM BID:$250 I Notice of Hearing:' P ' ' • PALISADES LUTHERAN ITEM NO:88990633051270000 CRAWFORD,CHARLENE M CUR ENTASSESSEES: - MINIMUM BID:$6150 - ITEM NO:9831 31040811'; 00 Date: 6-12-02, Time::'8:30 COUNTY CLERK NOTICE-Thte Fictitious CA 91710, a.m.,De t S 15.., . BY TERRIE, JOHNSON, Name Statement expires Steve Curtis, 13619 Soper CHURCH : CURRENT ASSESSEES:, MINIMUM BID:$2850 CANT ANC;RICHARD) .. . ITEM NO:9711309743103000 CRIG PARCEL:0455331409000 pe:e o:t cou is Deputy five years from the"date it Ave.,Chino,CA 94710. The addr s , f he rt This business is conducted . MINIMUM BID:$100- - DECKER,RICK - ITEMN0:90130635091120000 CANtONE,JOSEPH. ORIGPARCEL:0456153380000 CURRENTASSESSEES 04/18/02, 0.4/25/02 05/O2J02, was filed in'the,office of the 351.,_ North,;>:Arrowhead ITEM NO;88380632291120000; MINIMUM BID:$3000 CURRENTASSESSEES: MONjANO,ELAINE G(HW RIC CURRENTASSESSEES:' " TOVEG,ISAAC Avenue, -San:Bernardino, 05/09;02 County Clerk:' A,:'New by husband and wife. CURRENT ASSESSEES: , ; ITEM NO:89010633051330000 LUEHRS,MARK . , CANt4ONE,JEAN(HW JOSEPH) ESAR INC MINIMUM BID:S.12200 x', California 92415-0210. SBS-382024# Fictitious .Business Name I declare that all information RIVLIN,ABRAHAMJ- CURRENT ASSESSEES:.. MINIMUM BID:$4100 MINIA/UM BID:$1700' MINIMUM BID:$6150 ' . ITEM NO:9 83 3 31 04 0811 7011100 A copy of this-Order to Show Statement must be_filed in'this statement is true and MINIMUM B1D:$100 - MJR HOLDINGS INC ITEM ND:9014 0635091200000' ITEM:NO:94351178281100600 ITEM NO:9712309743104000 CRIG PARCEL:0455331450000 Cause shall be published'at SUMMONS' before that time. correct. ITEM NO:88390632291140000' MINIMUM.BID:$1450 CURRENTASSESSEES: - ORIGPARCEL:0282391100000: CRIG PARCEL:0456153310000 CURRENTASSESSEES: 1 least once•each week'for (CITACIONJUDICIAL) , doe finot of tsel statement ThLAtate.e CURTIS CURRENT ASSESSEES: ITEM NO:89030633061650000 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY CURRENT ASSESSEES:. . CURRENT ASSESSEES: TOVEG,ISAAC ;4 four successive weeks prior, CASE NUMBER:(Numero• does not of his ate ofza This County nt wok filed wan to the date set for hearing on del Caso)SCVSS079060 the use iB this state of n the County Clerk of San RIVLIN,ABRAHAM J CURRENT ASSESSEES: MINIMUM BID:$1300 WILD£ANYON 20 ESAR INC MINIMUM BID:512600 j Fictitious Business.Name in Bernardino County on April MINIMUM BID:$100 BRUCE,HOWARD E ITEM NO:90190635131020000 MINI UM BID:$6150 MINIMUMBID'.$6150 ITEM NO:9842 3129151090000 the petition in the following NOTICE TO DEFENDANT violation of:the rights of 08,2002, ITEMN0:88400632292320000 MINIMUMBID:$100 CURRENTASSESSEES: ITEMN0:9457232853126000 ITEMN0:9713309743105000 CURRENTASSESSEES: t newspaper of general (Aviso a Acusado): State another under Federal, The registrant(s) 1! circulation, printed In this Environmental Equipment, State,or common law(See commenced to transact , CURRENTASSESSEES: ITEM NO:8904 0633081240000 RALSON,RICHARD CURENT ASSESSEES: CRIG PARCEL:0456153390000. OGAWA,BRIAN . - county:The Sun . Inc.,a California corporation, Section 14411 et seq., business under the fictitious LOSANGELES HOMEOWNERS CURRENTASSESSEES: MINIMUM BID:$100 DAKO,TA NAT BK/TRCOIFARGO(' CURRENTASSESSEES: OGAWA,SEILEEN P Date:April 26,2002 Ronald E.' Talbott, an Business and Professions business name or names Al NEWELL,HOWARD 0 ITEM NO:90210635151090000 MINIMUM BID:$3600 ESAR INC ' ' MINIMUM BID:$3550 JAMES A.EDWARDS 'individual;. and, Does 1 'i First i listed E-Thisn 1992, • MINIMUM BID:$6300 NELSON,PATRICIAJ CURRENTASSESSEES: ITEM N0:94622350361720000 MINIMUM BID:$610D TEM NO:9844 312932114000 Judge of the Superior Court. through 40,inclusive g ' NOTICE-This Fictitious ' . 05/02/02,. 05/09/02, YOU ARE BEING SUED BY First ilin ITEM NO':88410632311400000 MINIMUMBID:$100_ FLEURY,RICHARD P CURENT ASSESSEES: ITEM NO;9719309806112000 CURRENTASSESSEES 05/16/02;05123/02 05/02/02, 05/09/02, 05/16/02, Name Statement expires CURRENTASSESSEES; ITEM NO:89060633081460000 WERBA,MARGE - DIMODICA,PHILIPF CURRENTASSESSEES: LEE,WON MOCK I PLAINTIFF.): Ud. le eats 05/23/02 five ears from the date it SBS-38811.1# Femnci ando); CServiclar ' RUSSOM,LEO J � � CURRENT ASSESSEES: FLEURY,PHYLLIS J(HW-RIC MINIMUM BID:$6150 MC GOWAN,WM C SR LEE,HYE SOCK 1f Financial Services � SBS-387455# was filed in the.office of the RUSSOM,HANNA BRUCE,HOWARD E FLEURY,PFJIRL R ITEM NO:9470 2350411040000 MC GO.WAN,EILEEN H MINIMUM BID:$5950 Corporation County Clerk. A New MINIMUM BID:$3950 • MINIMUM BID:$100 - MINIMUM BID:$3000 - CURRENTASSESSEES: ••- - MINIMUM BID:S100 ITEM NO:9854312956103000 1 SUMMONS Fictitious Business Name You have 30 CALENDAR - FICTITIOUS BUSINESS CITATION JUDICIAL) Statement must be filed ITEM NO:88420632311440000 ITEM NO:89070633101020000 ITEM NO:90250635181100000 ZINOWIEW,GREGORY F AND P ITEM NO:9720 309806113000 CURRENT ASSESSEES:. "l DAYS after this summons is '-NAME STATEMENT CURRENTASSESSEES;, ,, CURRENTASSESSEES: CURRENTASSESSEES: MINIMUMBID:$100 .' CRIB PARCEL:0402332740000 JGDCOMPANYINC ii dele so)SOIISS(80202 served on'you to file a _ File No,2002-05351 beforeth tot this statement GUERRA,MARY E, - BIGGS,GARY R SHAW,BRENT 0 . ITEM NO,:94732350432370000 CURRENTASSESSEES: . MINIMUM BID:$3800 . NOTICE.TO DEFENDANT typewritten response at this The following person(s) is does not of itself authorize ' HERNANDEZ,ANTHONY R MINIMUM BID:$3050 MINIMUM BID:$100 - CURRENTASSESSEES: PARKER;D H TEM NO:9856313002109000 f (Aviso a Acusado): will Rno to ter or phone call (are)doing business as the use to this state of e t p y y ACME MINI. STOR.AGE, MINIMUM BID:-$5950• ' ITEM ENT AS80633101180000 ITEM NO:962606351814600'00' .ESQUEDA)EDWARD A MINIMUM BIDS100 CURRENTASSESSEES: . 6 VERONICA •.. ADRIANA typewritten response must 14838 Foothill .Blvd., Fictitious Business Name in ITEM ENT AS3063231147000Q CURRENTASSESSEES CURRENTASSESSEES: . ESQUED,GRACE B TEM N0:9723309828101000 MINIMU BID:$ • 1 CASTOR':.ERIC JAUREQOUI be in proper legal form if you Fontana, CA 92335,,(909) another andee nFederof CURRENTASSESSEES:,. .. CASSADAY,MICHAEL E EVANS,VALERIE C J MINIMUMBID:$4650 CRIG PARCELA40259106000 MINIMUM BID:$230 want the court to hear your 622-8622. AVILA' MARTIN -FLORET State,or common law(See NICKERSON,WILLIAM A• CASSADAY,DIAN JACOBS,SHARON M J ITEM NO:94772350463160000 CURRENTASSESSEES: ITEM NO:9858 313005112000 j DOES 1 TO" :100, case,.If you do not.file your James T. „Fong, -10961 Section 14411 et seq., NICKERSON,BETTJ - MINIMUM BID:$2850 • MINIMUMBID:$100 - - CURRENT'ASSESSEES: . ' BODELL,BRAD CURRENTASSESSEES: response on time,you may Wilderness Dr.,'Alla Loma, INCLUSIVE. Business and Professions lose the case, and your CA 91737, MINIMUM BID:$100 ITEM N0:89090633101220000 TEM N0:90260635211330000 ()HEN2E GHARLES BODELL,RENE D LAMBDIN,GEORGE A YOU ARE BEING SUED BY Code), ITEM NO:88480632321340000. _CURRENTASSESSEES: CURRENTASSESSEES: MINIMUM ID:$2900 MINIMUM BID:$5550 LAMBDIN,JOANNE PLAINTIFF A Ud. le alto wages,money and property lily J. Fong, 10961 Filin CURRENT ASSESSEES: BEDROSIAN,TISHA A RICHARDSON,ROBERT R ITEM NO:94782350463170000' TEM NO:973130985110800D0 MINIMUMBID:510450 demandando):, CELIA may be taken without further Wilderness Dr.; Alta Loma, Filing 2, 05/09/02; 00/16/02, R Y L LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BEDROSIAN,LINDA M MINIMUMBID:$100 CURRENT'SSESSEES: CRIG PARCEL:0456182890000 TEM NO:9860313016105000q' GONZALEZ. ,EVANGELINA warning from the court. CA 91737. OS/23/02 FLORET There are other 'legal This business is conducted SBS-387102# MINIMUM BID:$3350 ' BEDROSIAN,CHRISTINE ITEM NO:90290635221050000 CHENZE,CFIARLES CURRENTASSESSEES: CURRENTASSESSEES You have 30 CALENDAR requirements.You may want by husband and wife. ITEM NO:88500632322070000 MINIMUM BID:$1800 - - CURENTASSESSEES: MINIMUM Bib:$3000 KIM,YONGJ - MOORE,JESSE DAYS after this'summons is to call an attorney right Ideclarethatallinformation CURRENT ASSESSEES: ITEM NO:89100633101270000 SKJELSTAD,VINETTE E ITEM NO:94882350503070000 MINIMUM BID:$2950`. , MOORE,MARILEE RI served on you to file a away.'If you do not know an in this statement Is true and FICTITIOUS BUSINESS BLUNDELL,JOSEPH E CURRENTASSESSEES:: MINIMUM BID:$1950 CURRENTA'�,�SESSEES: ITEM NO:9733309907111000 MINIMUM BID:5100 typewritten.response at this attorney, you,may call.an correct. .. NAME STATEMENT- FAGGARD,SANSIERAY L BEDROSIAN,TISHA A ITEM NO:90310635221500000 . VERDUN,A:,ES - ORIG PARCEL:0402154270000 ITEM NO:9875 31310410100l5 court.A letter or phone call legal ai -office service ore T/RON eEI, Ffe owi g person( MINIMUM BID:$100 BEDROSIAN,LINDA M - ' CURRENT ASSESSEES:. QUON,HENRY ' CURRENTASSESSEES: CURRENTASSESSEES. v will not protect you; 'your Phone book (listed in.the heis CounmenC ark fofa.San The following persons) is ITEM NO:88510632322080000 BEDROSIAN,CHRISTINE JACKSON,DENNIS L HOLT,HOWA;D M(JO•AGNES LAMBDIN,GEORGE A WILHELMI,MARGURETTA 1, typewritten response must ) ty (are)doing business as:' ' CURRENTASSESSEES: MINIMUM BID:$3050 • BRONK,NINA L MINIMUM B10 100 ) LAMBDIN,JOANNE SLAGLE,JEWEL C. be in proper legal form if you spuuen d sta q c Cation Ber2002no County.on April 0MG AMERICA, 55569 29 PERRY MORRIS CORPORATION ITEM NO:8912063311117000 MINIMUM BID:$2000 ITEM NO:9494235055621000 MINIMUMBID:S2880 • • • MINIMUM BID:$28000 want the court to hear,your judiciiiaal usted tiene un plazo- The. ' registrant(s) CA 922 Yucca Valley, < case.If you do not file your • MINIMUM BID:$8350 CURRENTASSESSEES: ITEM NO:90330635221640000- CURRENTASS,SSEES: ITEM NO:9738309930107000 ITEM NO:98763131101010090 response on time,you may de 30 DIASCALENDARIOS commenced to• transact' Home Savings Mortgage, ITEM NO:88520632322090000 HOLT,PAULAC CURRENTASSESSEES: EWING,TERRIf ' CURRENTASSESSEES:' CURRENTASSESSEES ;3 lose the case; and your p srpuest•p esenter - ulna business Oamet e f naious Cali#02,500 E.Esp130ade CURRENT ASSESSEES: MINIMUM 81D:$7050 ' JACKSON,DENNIS L , MINIMUM BID:$ii 0 KEE,THOMAS G AVA,INC .1 wages,money and property en alto corte. Una carts o fisted above on NIA. HERTZBERG,GARY L ITEM NO:89140633121.180000 BRONK,NINA L ITEM NO:95002050584320000- KEE,DONA M ' - MINIMUM BID:$2550 ' may be taken without further una Itamada telefonica no le NOTICE-This ' Fictitious This business is conducted MINIMUM BID:$5150 CURRENTASSESSEES: MINIMUM BID:$4400 - CURENT-ASSE SEES: MINIMUM BID:$410 ITEM NO:9877 3131101110000 warning .from. the court, bye corporation A0578951. r. There are other. legal °frecera protection; su Name Statement expires I declare that all information ITEM NO:88530632322150000. LARRANCE,EDITH L ITEM NO:90340635241030000 SAMAK,DAVID fi ' ITEM NO:9739 309931114(300 CURRENTASSESSEES:r, . requirements.You may want re euesue'ecumala copulas five'years ft m the oft a in this statement is true and CURRENTASSESSEE$:,, . MINIMUMBID:$100 CURRENTASSESSEES: MINIMUM BID:$3850 . ORIGPARCEL:04023,92020000 HANNA,KHALIL' r3! . , to call 'an attorney right formalfades p J n•la's Countyd in the° IA New HOME SAVINGS BEAUDRY,BEVERLY C H ' ' ITEM NO:89150633121290000, JACKSON,KENNETH M ITEM NO:950223 612010006 CURRENTASSESSEES:. ' HANNA,LEILA M away.If you do not know an a m li dal s( usted tiers County Business Name - MINIMUM BID:$5600 CURRENT ASSESSEES: JACKSON,MELANIE S CURRENT ASSES ES:• • GUZMAN,ROMAN D MINIMUM BID:$2050;•• -attorney, you may call an P P 9 MORTGAGE ITEM NO:88550632322 30000 SURD,STEPHANIE G • MINIMUM BID:$500 ' ' MERRICK,MARIE -GUZMAN,JULIE A ITEM NO:987831311,4'102000 attomey referral service or a que la_corte no pree. su Statement must be filed S/ MICHAEL W, LEVY, 4 caso. Si usted no presents before that.lime. President CURRENTASSESSEES; BURD,RICHARDA ITEMN0:90370635511150000 ,MERRICK,MARIE MINIMUM BID:$3200 CURRENT ASSESS ES: legal old office(listed in the• su rep testa a teem o, The filin of this statement • pp P p 9. This statement was filed with KLINE,MARY MINIMUM BID:$3400 CURRENT ASSESSEES: MINIMUM BID:$5200 TEM N0:9740 309932103000 UCHIMA,KEITH T:dd Despues ok)de 'que le Puede Herder el case, y le does not of itself authorize the County Clerk of San ' WHETNIGHT,ELENA ' ITEM N0:'89160633121300000 WALTERS,PATRICIA E ITEM NO:9511235015180006 CRIG PARCEL:6402142250090 MINIMUMBID:5100 entreguen alto ditaclon Pueden guitar su salario,su the use in this state of;a Bernardino County on April ' - MINIMUM BID:$3750 . CURRENT ASSESSEES: WALTERS,DANNY ' CURRENT ASSESSEES:- CURRENTASSESSEES:- ITEM NO:9879,313123102000- judicial usted tiene un pplaza 'dinero y,otras.cases de su Fictitious Business Name in 25,2002. - ITEM N0:88560632322340000 LARRANCE,EDITH L WALTERS,JOSEPH • ' RUSSETT,SHERRI L' NAJOR,ELIA - CURRENTASSESSEES: de 30 DIAS CALENDARIOS Propiedad sin aviso ,violation of the rights of The registrants) CURRENTASSESSEES: MINIMUMBID:$100 WALTERS,DANNY PITTS,BARBARA RAZOOKI,GEORGE-Z&NAZHA BUCK,MICHAEL para ; presenter una adicional 'por parte'de la another under Federal; ,commenced to transact , Cy corte. Exisien otros State,or common law.(See business under the fictitious KIER;MARY A ITEM NO:89170633121350000 HARTWIG,SANDY MINIMUM BID:$100 ATTIQ,LOUTS MINIMUM1tr D:$1550 respuesta escrita a maqutna requisitos legates, Ruede. Section 14411 et" seq., business name or names - en este corte. Una carte o .:. - . Thursday, May 2, 2002 FONTANA HERALD NEWS - A9 Public Notice Advertising Public Notice Advertising Protects Your Right To Know ( / Protects Your Right To Know • CITY OF FONTANA FOOTHILL BOULEVARD 1/P.0.#02-0B003 April, 2002. (APN'0239.201.050,0239- Fontana,CA 92335. E.Rodriguez,husband and unmarried woman. and or she knows to be false, FONTANA,CALIFORNIA TO PACIFIC ELECTRIC 201-54,0239-201-56). wife,as joint tenants as trus- 'Jesus Falcon,a widower as is guilty of a crime.(B&P RAILROAD ` NOTICE INVITING CITY OF FONTANA Should you have any ques- tor, recorded.on 9/16/1997 Joint Tenants Duly Ap- Code 17913) I am.also NOTICE OF PUBLIC / SEALED BIDS FOR 8353 Sierra Avenue Date anb Place of Planning Lions concerning this project, as Instrument No. .pointed Trustee:Fidelity Na- aware that all information HEARING BID NO.SB-41-021/ CONSTRUCTION OF Fontana,CA 92335 Commission Public Hearing: please contact Kevin Ryan, 19970339566;in book No.; tional Foreclosure Solutions on this statement be- (909)350-6792 Tuesday; May 28,2002,at Assistant Planner, at(909) page,of the Official records . Recorded 3/2/2001 as In- comes Public Record A PUBLIC HEARING HAS PUBLIC NOTICE; IS SOUTH HIGHLAND Publish: May 2,9,2002 6:00 P.M. 350-6655. of San Bernardino County, strument No.20010078181 upon filing. Signature/s: BEEN SCHEDULED BE- HEREBY GIVEN that the AVENUE AND JUNIPER P.O.#02.06003 City Hall Council Chambers California.The total amount in book—;page-of Offi- VIVA J.MARROQUIN.This FORE THE PLANNING CITY OF FONTANA, as AVENUE 8353/ Sierra Avenue, ANY INTERESTED PARTY of the unpaid balance of the cialRecordsintheofficeof .statementwas filed with the COMMISSION OF'THE CITY,invites sealed bids for SEWER SYSTEM CITY OF FONTANA Fontana,CA 92335 MAY APPEAR AND obligation secured by the the Recorder of San Berner- County Clerk of San Berner- CITY OF FONTANA FOR the above stated project and IMPROVEMENTS FONTANA,CALIFORNIA / PRESENT ANY INFORMA- property to be sold and rea--`dino County,California,Date dino County on 04/08/2002. THE FOLLOWING: will receive such bids in the Should you have any ques- TION WHICH MAY BE OF sonably estimated costs, of Sale:.5/23/2002 at 12:00 I herebycertifythat this copy offices of the City Clerk up BID NO.SP-46-02 NOTICE OF PUBLIC tens concerning this project, ASSISTANCE TO THE CITY expenses and advances at PM Place of Sale:At the is a correct copy of the origi- Conditional Use Permit to the hour of2:0opmonthe HEARING /please contact Craig L. COUNCIL. A COPY OF the time of the initial publi- North Arrowhead Avenue nal statement on file in my #02-005 23rd day of May,2002,at PUBLIC NOTICE IS / Bruorton, AICP, Principal THE ENVIRONMENTAL cation of the Notice of Sale entrance to;the County office. San Bernardino ' which time they will be pub- HEREBY GIVEN that the A MEETING HAS BEEN Planner,at(909)350-7625. DOCUMENTATION IS is$144,906.94.In the event Courthouse,351 North Ar- County Clerk By:s/CARLA A Conditional Use Permit for. licly opened and read aloud. CITY OF FONTANA, as SCHEDULED BERORE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW tender other than Path:is! ro'wheadAvefiu2,San Ber-' MIMS/Deputy.. • anew Off-Sale Type 20ABC CITY,invites sealed bids for THE CITY OF FONTANA ANY INTERESTED PARTY IN THE PLANNING DIVI- accepted the Trustee may nardino, California.The to NOTICE: This fictitious license for Chevron Gas Sta- The work of improvement the above stated project and CITY COUNCIL,FOR THE MAY APPEAR AND SION,CITY HALL. withhold the issuance of tal amount of the unpaid bal- name statement expires five Lion/McDonalds. consists of furnishing all will receive such bids in the FOLLOWING:/ PRESENT ANY INFORMA- Trustee's Deed until'funds' ance of the oobligation se- years from the date it was materials,equiprfient,tools, offices of the City Clerk up TION WHICH MAY BE OF IF YOU CHALLENGE IN become available to the cured by the property to be filed in the office of the Environmental Determina- labor and incidentals as re- to the hour of 10:00 AM on SPECIFIC PLAN ASSISTANCE TO THE COURT ANY ACTION payee or endorse as a mat- sold and reasonable esti- County Clerk. A new ficti- tion: The Environmental quired by the Plans,Specifi- the 23rd day of May,2002, AMENDMENT#02-003 PLANNING COMMISSION. •TAKEN CONCERNING A ter of right.Dated:5/2/2002 mated costs,expenses and tious business name state- Officer has reviewed the cations and Contract Docu- at which time they will be (SIERRA LAKES A COPY OF THE ENVI- PUBLIC HEARING ITEM, Verdugo Trustee.Service advances at the time of the ment must be filed before, project and made the follow- ments for the above stated publicly opened and read- SPECIFIC PLAN RONMENTAL DOCUMEN- YOU MAY BE LIMITED TO Corp.,as said Trustee 2710 initial publication of the No- that time. The filing of this ing determination and rec- project.The general items of aloud. AMENDMENT#3)& TATION ISAVAILABLE FOR RAISING ONLY THOSE IS- Winona Avenue 1st floor 'tice'of Sale ib:$94,109.66. statement does not of itself ommendation: This project work to be dorte hereunder GENERAL PLAN REVIEW IN THE PLAN- SUES YOU OR SOMEONE Burbank, CA 91504 For StreetAddres}sorothercom- authorize the use in this has been determined not to consist of thecbnstruction of The work of improvement AMENDMENT#02-003 NING DIVISION, CITY ELSE RAISED AT THE Sales Information Call: Mon designation of real state of a fictitious business have a significant effect on clearing&grubbing,survey- consists of furnishing all HALL. PLANNING COMMISSION (714) 573-1965 By: Lisa property: 8820 Sewell Av- name in violation of the the environment and is ex- ing/staking,asphalt and con- „materials,equipment,tools, Specific,Plan Amendment PUBLIC HEARING DE- Clary Trustee's Sales Pro- ,enue,Fontana, CA9233.5.. rights of another under fed- empt under Section 3.07 No crete paving,`asphalt slurry labor and incidentals as re- #02-003(Sierra Lakes Spe- IF YOU CHALLENGE IN SCRIBED IN THIS NOTICE, cessor P174381.5/25/9 05/ A.P.N.:0191-263=17-0-000. eral,state,or common law Possibility of Significant Ef- sealing, chain-link fencing, quired by thePlans,Specifi- cific Plarl Amendment#3)is COURT ANY ACTION OR IN WRITTEN CORRE- 16/2002 The undersigned Trustee (See Section 14400, ET feet,of the Local Guidelines concrete curb and gutter, cations and Contract Docu- an amendment of the Sierra TAKEN CONCERNING A SPONDENCE DELIVERED .disclaims any liability for any •SEQ.,J3usiness and Profes- for Implementing the Califor- signing and striping, land- ments for the above stated Lakes Specific Plan to PUBLIC HEARING ITEM, TO THE CITY AT, OR NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S incorrectness Of'The street sions Code). nia Environmental Quality scape irrigation, landscape project.The general items of modify the alignment of Si- YOU MAY BE LIMITED TO PRIOR TO, THE PUBLIC SALE TS No.:2002-28619- addressor other'cortimon Publish: May 2,9, 16, 23, Act(20011. planting and 90-day majnte- work to be done hereunder erra Lakes Parkway,modify RAISING ONLY THOSE IS- HEARING. C Loan No.: 4502378484 designation, if any, shown 2002 nance. consist of the construction of the acreages of Planning SUES YOU OR SOMEONE YOU ARE IN DEFAULT above If no street address Location of Property: The • clearing & grubbing, con- Areas,2d,22,23,24,25,26, ELSE RAISED AT THE Publish:May 2,2002 UNDER A DEED OF 'or other common designa- FICTITIOUS BUSINESS project is located at 3870 Copies of'Plans,Specifica- struction of approximately and eliminate a 3.6 acre PLANNING COMMISSION P.O.#02-0B003 TRUST, DATED 4/1/1994 tion is`shown,rdirections"to NAME STATEMENT Sierra Avenue,Fontana. Lions, and Contract Docu- 4,800 LF of 10-inch vitrified business park.General Plan PUBLIC HEARINGS DE- UNLESS•YOU TAKE AC- the location of the property FBN#2002-04814 ments are available from the clay sewer pipe,manholes, Amendment #02-003 will SCRIBED IN THIS NOTICE, NOTICE OF ' TION TO PROTECT YOUR may be obtained by sending The following person(s) is Date of Hearing: City of Fontana(City), at and associated trench exca- modify the General Plan OR IN WRITTEN CORRE- DISADVANTAGED PROPERTY, IT MAY BE a written request to the ben- , (are) doing business as: May 13,2002 8353 Sierra Avenue, vation/recompaction, and ' Land Use Policy Map to re- SPONDENCE DELIVERED BUSINESS ENTER- SOLD AT A PUBLIC SALE. eficiary within 10 days of the CHRISTIAN BOOK EX- FontanajCalifornia92335, pavement removal/restora- fleet the Specific Plan TO THE CITY AT, OR PRISES(DBE)GOALS IF YOU NEED AN EXPLA- date of first publication of this CHANGE, 16981 FOOT- Place of Hearing: (909)35(5-7610, upon pay- Lion. Amendment.These projects PRIOR TO, THE PUBLIC AND RIGHTS OF PUBLIC NATION OF THE NATURE Notice of Sale.Fidelity Na- HILL BLVD. UNIT #E, City Hall Council Chambers ment of g Thirty-five Dol- have been filed by the Sierra HEARING. TO COMMENT OF THE PROCEEDING tional Foreclosure Solu- FONTANA, CA 92335, 8353 Sierra Avenue lars ($36.00) non-refund- Copies of Plans,Specifica- Lakes Lend Company,LLC. AGAINST .YOU, YOU tions, 19732 MacArthur KARL M PETERS, 15394 Fontana,CA 92335 able fee($45.00 if mailed). Lions, and Contract Docu- • Publish:May 2,2002 NOTICE IS HEREBY SHOULD CONTACT A Blvd„Suite 100 Irvine,Cali- MEGAN CT,FONTANA,CA Any questions pertaining to ments are available from the Environmental Determina- P-0.#02-0B003 GIVEN to the public that: LAWYER.A public auction fomia 92612(949)955-1887. 92336.This business is/was Time of'Hearing: this projbct should be di- City of Fontana(City),at tion:The Environmental Of- sale to the highest bidder for Sale Line: (916) 387-7728 ' conducted by:An Individual. 6:00 P.M. rected t6 Leticia Ortiz at 8353 Sierra Avenue, ficer has reviewed the CITY OF FONTANA 1.The Town of Yucca Valley cash,cashier's check drawn Amy Lemus,,Trustee Sale. Began Transacting Business (909)350-6501. Fontana,California 92335, project and made the follow- FONTANA,CALIFORNIA has heretofore adopted a on a state or national bank, Officer Date: 4/30/2002 on 02/04/2002. BY SIGN- Should you have any ques- - (909)350-6792,upon pay- ing environmental determi- • major project DBE overall check drawn by state or fed ASAP476751 5/2,5/9,5/16 ING BELOW, I DECLARE Lions concerning this project, Proposal must be accom- ment of a Thirty-five Dol- nation and recommendation: NOTICE OF PUBLIC goal consisting of utilizing eral credit union,or a check THAT ALL INFORMATION please contact Kevin Ryan, panied by a proposal guar- lars ($35.00) non-refund- The project could not have HEARING disadvantaged business en- drawn by a state or federal ABANDONMENT OF USE IN THIS STATEMENT IS , Assistant Planner,at(909) antee in;the,form of cash, able fee($45.00 if mailed). a significant effect on the terprises in all aspects of savings and loan associa- OF FICTITIOUS TRUE AND CORRECT. A 350-6655. cashier's}check, a certified Any questions pertaining to environment and a Negative A PUBLIC HEARING HAS contracting to the maximum tion,or savings association, BUSINESS NAME registrant who declares as check or bid bond available this project should be di- Declaration is recom- BEEN SCHEDULED BE- extent feasible and commit- or savings bank specified in FBN#1999-11448 true information,which he ANY INTERESTED PARTY to the CITY in the amount of rected toGeorge Harvilla, mended per the Local FORE THE PLANNING ting itself to substantially in- Section 5102 to the Finan- The following persons have or she knows to be false, MAY APPEAR AND at least ten-percent(10%)of P.E.at(909)427-9166. Guidelines for Implementing COMMISSION OF THE creasing disadvantaged cial code and authorized to abandoned the use of the is guilty of a crime.(B&P PRESENT ANY INFORMA- the total amount bid. Any the California Environmental CITY OF FONTANA FOR business enterprise utilize- do business in this state,will fictitious business name: Code 17913) I am also TION WHICH MAY BE OF proposal hot accompanied Proposals must be accom- Quality Act.(2001). THE FOLLOWING: Lion.These goals further in- be held by duly appointed BTE FUEL STOP GAL- aware that all information ASSISTANCE TO THE by such a guarantee will not panied by a proposal guar- elude ensuring that the Town trustee. The sale`will be LANTRY GAS INC.,10002 on this statement be- PLANNING COMMISSION. be considered. A payment antee in the form of cash, Location: The project is lo- Tentative Parcel Map 'of Yucca Valley,and its con- made,but without covenant ALMOND AVE. FONTANA, comes Public Record • ACOPY OF THE APPLICA- bond and:a performance cashier's check,a certified cated north and south of Si #15797 tractors and subcontractors, or warranty, expressed or CA92335.GALANTRYGAS upon filing. Signature/s: TION ENVIRONMENTAL bond, each in an amount check or bid bond available erra Lakes Parkway be- which are recipients of Fed- implied,regarding title,pos- INC., 1362 KASHLAN RD, KARL PETERS.This state- DOCUMENTATION IS equal to 100%of the total to the CITY in the amount of tween Sierra and Citrus Av- A request to subdivide an eral-Aid Funds, agrees to session,or incumberances, LAHABRA HIGHS, CA -ment was filed with the AVAILABLE FOR INSPEC- contract amount, shall be at least ten-percent(10%)of enues in the Sierra lakes 18,472 square foot parcel provide disadvantaged busi- to satisfy the obligation se- 90631. Business was con- CountyClerkofSanBernar- TION IN THE PLANNING required egncurrentiy with the total amount bid. Any Specific Plan (APN 0239- into two lots of 9,236 square ness enterprises with the cured by said Deed of Trust. ducted by: A Corporation. dino County on 04/15/2002. DIVISION,CITY HALL. the execution of the contract proposal not accompanied 201-050, 0239-201-54, feet each. maximum opportunity to par- The undersigned Trustee Began Transacting Business I hereby certify that this copy and shall be in the form set by such a guarantee will not 0239- 01-56). ticipate in the performance disclaims any liability for any on N/A. BY SIGNING BE- is a correct copy of the origi- IF YOU CHALLENGE IN forth in the contract docu- be considered. A payment Environmental Determina- of contracts and subcon- incorrectness of the property LOW, I DECLARE THAT nal statement on file in my COURT ANY ACTION ments. i' bond and a performance Date-and Place of City tion: This.project has been tracts and to take all reason- address or other common ALL INFORMATION IN office. San Bernardino TAKEN CONCERNING A .` bond, each in an amount Coundil Public Hearing: determined not to have a able steps in accordance designation, if any, shown THIS STATEMENT IS County Clerk By:s/MARGIE PUBLIC HEARING ITEM, Any contract entered into equal to 100%of the total Tuesday,June 18,2002,at significant effect on the en- with 49 CFR 26 to ensure herein. TRUSTOR(S): TRUE AND CORRECT.A HUNT/Deputy. YOU MAY BE LIMITED TO pursuant to this notice will contract amount, shall be 7:00 P.M. vironment and is exempt that disadvantaged business JOSEPHINE BROWN ; registrant who declares as NOTICE: This fictitious RAISING ONLY THOSE IS- incorporate the provisions of required concurrently with City Hall Council Chambers under Section 3.07 and Sec- enterprises have the maxi- VALORIE GRAHAM DER- true information,which he name statement expires five SUES YOU OR SOMEONE the State Labor Code..La- the execution of the contract 8353 Sierra Avenue, tion 3.16, Class 15, of the mum opportunity to compete RICK R. GRAHAM t Rey or she knows to be false,''years from the date it was ELSE RAISED AT THE bor Code Section 1735 re- and shall be in the form set Fontana,CA 92335 Local Guidelines for Imple- and perform contracts: corded 4/12/1994 as Instru- is guilty of a crime.(B&P filed in the office of the PLANNING COMMISSION quires that no discrimination forth in the contract docu- menting the California Envi- - ment No.94169868,in book Code 17913) I am also County Clerk. A new ficti- PUBLIC HEARING DE- be made in the employment ments. Should you have any ques- ronmental Quality Act 2.The Town of Yucca Valley ,page,of Official Records aware that all information tious business name state- SCRIBED IN THIS NOTICE, of persons upon public tionscOncerningthisproject, (20011. has set the annual goal at in the office of the County on this statement be- ment must be filed before OR IN WRITTEN CORRE- works because of the race, Any contract entered into please contact Craig L. 4.5% for participation in Recorder of SAN BERNAR- comes Public Record that time. The filing of this SPONDENCE DELIVERED religious Freed, color, na- pursuant to this notice will Bruorton, AICP, Principal Location of Property: projects receiving U.S. DINO County,State of Cali- upon filing. Signature: statement does not of itself TO THE CITY AT, OR tionalorigin,-ancestry;physi- incorporate the provisions of Planner,at(909)350-7625. 7744 Juniper Avenue Deparatment of Transporta- fornia. Date of Sale: 5/23/ Khaled Tabbah, President. authorize the use,,ln:this . PRIOR TO THE PUBLICt;;;gaI:f lar !riMiFnedi�€11ipggt vithf;iStat4.:LaboriGode::La- .e4, ,iry it,.-.:,<, : ,,,, :,,::.;jp 3,;;:,,Ai 1 y ,>.lv�s Jj4A funds 2002 at 12:00 PM Place_of .The fictitio4s business name state of.a fictitious btustihess .. HEARING.'"'-- dltion,martal,status,or sex bor Code Secti n 1735 re- ANY;INTERESTED PARTY Date Hearing: ,,,,., . tors,for,•the, eriod„ .•Qcto- Sale:AT THE N . ltl referredto a`boY Miad\fil ;,inanie.in violat'nn'i of such e(sdn"�°exce 1as' s `rP ," v a "'' a. s•-`1' ' 9 E,,EN- ed {r err the p [ p quires'fh2tnodiscnmination MAID` API3E�R``'`AND"Y�Ia�1 , 0tY2" (ier9',20 'iriFfft�l"iyliSe{Stem ROWHEAD AVENUE EN- in the County of San Bernar- .rightsofanotherunderfed- Publish:May 2,2002 provided in Government be made in the employment PRESENT ANY INFORMA- ber 30,2002. TRANCETOTHE COUNTY dino on 04/30/2002.1 hereby eral,state,or common law PO.#02-0B003 Code Section12940.Corn of persons upon public TION WHICH MAY BE OF Place of Hearing: COURTHOUSE, 351 certify that this copy isacor- (See Section 14400, ET pliance with the prevailing works because of the race, ASSISTANCE TOTHE CITY City Hall Council Chambers 3. The public may inspect NORTH ARROWHEAD AV- rest copy of,the original SEQ.,Business and Profes- • CITY OF FONTANA rates of wages and appren- religious creed, color, na- COUNCIL. A COPY OF 8353 Sierra Avenue the,goals and a description ENUE,SAN BERNARDINO, statement on file in my office. sions Code), 'FONTANA,CALIFORNIA' ticeship eemployment tional origin,ancestry,physi- 'THE ENVIRONMENTAL Fontana,CA 92335. of how they were set at.the CALIFORNIA The property San Bernardino County Publish: May 2, 9, 16,23, standards stablishedbythe cal handicap;medical con- DOCUMENTATION IS Community Development address is purported to be: Clerk By:s/MARGIE HUNT/ 2002 NOTICE OF PUBLIC State Director of Industrial 'dition,marital status,or sex AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW Time of Hearing Department of the Town of 14768 SHADOW DRVIE Deputy , HEARING Relation will be required. of such persons,except as IN THE PLANNING DIVI- 6:00 P.M. Yucca Valley, located at FONTANA, CA. 92335 Publish: May 2,9,16,23, FICTITIOUS BUSINESS provided in Government SION,CITY HALL. 58928 Business Center Assessor's Parcel Number: 2002 NAME STATEMENT A MEETING HAS BEEN Affirmative action to ensure Code Section 12940.Com- Should you have any ques- Drive,Yucca Valley,Califor- 0237-381-29-0-000 Legal FBN#2002-05061 SCHEDULED BEFORE against idiscrimination in pliance with the prevailing IF YOU CHALLENGE'IN tions concerning this project, nia,for a period of forty-five Description:As more fully FICTITIOUS BUSINESS The following person(s)is THE PLANNING COMMIS employment practices on rates of wages and appren COURT ANY ACTION please contact DiTanyon (45)days from the date that described on said Deed of NAME STATEMENT (are)doing business as:SI- SION OF THE CITY OF the basis of race,color,na- ticeship employment Stan- TAKEN CONCERNING A Johnson,Assistant Plan- this notice is first published: Trust.The total amount se- FBN#2002-04212 ERRA BUSINESS SOLU- FONTANA FOR THE FOL- tional origin, ancestry, sex, dards established by the PUBLIC HEARING ITEM, ner,at(909)350-6694. cured by said instrument as The following person(s) is TIONS,9714 SIERRA AVE LOWING: or religion will also be re- State Director of Industrial YOU MAY BE LIMITED TO 4.The U.S. Department of of the time of initial publica- (are) doing business as: SUITE C, FONTANA, CA quired.r. Relations will be required. RAISING ONLY THOSE IS- ANY INTERESTED PARTY Transportation and the Town Lion of this notice is CHERRY ESTATES, 8300 92335. KWANG H LEE, CONDITIONAL USE i SUES YOU OR SOMEONE MAY APPEAR AND of Yucca Valley will accept $99,112.25,which includes. CHERRY AVE,FONTANA, 23746 GOLDRUSH DR, PERMIT#02-006 : The CITY hereby;affirma- Affirmative action to ensure ELSE RAISED AT THE PRESENT ANY INFORMA- comments on the said goal the total amount of the un- CA92335,Mailing Address: DIAMOND BAR,CA 91765- tively ensures that minority against discrimination in PLANNING COMMISSION TION WHICH MAY BE OF for forty-five(45)days from paid balance(including ac- PO BOX 7655, LAGUNA' This business is/was con- ' Conditional Use Permit business enterprises will be employment practices on PUBLIC HEARINGS DE- ASSISTANCE. TO THE the date that this notice is crued and unpaid interest),` 'NIGUEL, CA 92607. ducted by:An Individual. #02-006 is a request for afforded full opportunity to the basis of race,color,na- SCRIBED IN THIS NOTICE, PLANNING COMMISSION. first published and said corn- and reasonable estimated CHERRY ESTATES ASSET Began Transacting Business approval to allow a new submit lbids in response to tional origin, ancestry, sex, OR IN WRITTEN CORRE- ACOPYOFTHEAPPLICA- mentsshallbeconsideredto costs, expenses, and ad- PARTNERS,LLC,28MON- on 04/18/2002. BY SIGN- ABC license for off-site this notice and will not be or religion will also be re- SPONDENCE DELIVERED TION AND ENVIRONMEN- be for informational pur- vances at the time of initial ARCH BAY PLAZA #E, ING BELOW, I DECLARE sale of beer and wine at a discriminated against on the quired. , TO THE CITY AT, OR TAL DOCUMENTATION IS poses only. publication of this notice. DANA POINT,CA 92629. THAT ALL INFORMATION liquor store. basis of race,color,national PRIOR TO, THE PUBLIC AVAILABLE FOR INSPEC- Date:April 17, 2002 LAW This business is/was con- IN THIS STATEMENT IS origin,ancestry,sex,or reli- The CITY hereby affirma- HEARING, TION IN THE PLANNING ,5.,In addition to the forego- OFFICES OF STEVEN J. ducted by:A Limited Liabil- TRUE AND CORRECT A Environmental Determina- gion in any consideration tively ensures that minority DIVISION,CITY HALL. ing,interested minority and MELMET, INC-, AS ity Company.gegen Trans- registrant who declares as Lion: This project has been leading;to the award of con- business enterprises will be Publish:May 2,2002 majority contractor organize- TRUSTEE KATRINA acting Business on 11/02/ true information,which he determined not to have a tract. ! afforded full opportunity to P.O.#02-06003 , IF YOU CHALLENGE IN Lions, upon request,shall ALLEN,Authorized Signa- 2001. BY SIGNING BE- or she knows to be false, significant effect on the en- submit bids in response to COURT ANY ACTION receive a direct mailing of ture 2912 S.Daimler Street, LOW, I DECLARE THAT is guilty of a crime.(B&P vironment and is exempt The contract documents call this notice and will not be CITY OF FONTANA TAKEN CONCERNING A the complete program with Santa Ana,California92705- ALL, INFORMATION IN Code 17913) I am also under Section 3.16,Class 1, for monthly progress pay- discriminated against on the FONTANA,CALIFORNIA PUBLIC HEARING ITEM, a request that they provide 5811 Sales Line:'(916)387= 'THIS `STATEMENT IS aware-that all information of the Local Guidelines for ments based upon the basis of race,color,national YOU MAY BE LIMITED TO written comments to-the 7728 For Reinstatement TRUE AND CORRECT A on this statement be- Implementing the California engineer's estimate of the origin,ancestry,sex,or reli- NOTICE OF PUBLIC RAISING ONLY THOSE IS- Town of Yucca Valley on this and Pay-Off Requests, registrant who declares as comes Public Record Environmental Quality Act percentage of work corn- gion in any consideration HEARING SUES YOU OR SOMEONE program. Please call(949)622-3388' true information,which he upon filing. Signature/s: .(2002). pleted, The CITY will retain leading to the award of con- ELSE RAISED AT THE THIS OFFICE ISATTEMPT- or she knows to be false, KWANG HO.LEE. This 10 percent of each progress tract. A MEETING HAS BEEN PUBLIC HEARING DE- TOWN OF YUCCA VALLEY ING TO COLLECTA DEBT is guilty of acrime.(B&P statement was filed with the Location of Property: payment as security for SCHEDULED BEFORE SCRIBED IN THIS NOTICE, , AND ANY INFORMATION' Code 1791i) I am also CountyClerkofSanBernar- 13451 Baseline Avenue, completion of the balance of The contract documents call THE CITY OF FONTANA OR IN WRITTEN CORRE- Janet M. Anderson, Town OBTAINED WILL BE USED aware that all information dino County on 04/18/2002. Fontana,CA 92336 ' the work.At the request and for monthly progress pay- PLANNING COMMISSION SPONDENCE DELIVERED Clerk • FOR THAT PURPOSE. on this statement be- I hereby certify that this copy expense of the successful ments based upon the FOR THE FOLLOWING: TO THE CITY AT, OR ASAP476454 5/2,5/9,5/16 comes Public Record isacorrectcopyoftheorigi- Date of Hearing: bidder,"the CITY will pay the engineer's estimate of the PRIOR TO, THE PUBLIC Dated:April 29,2002 upon filing. Signature/s: nal statement on file in my May 13,2002 amounts so retained upon percentage of work corn- SPECIFIC PLAN HEARING, • NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S Ralph Beatty, Manager office. Sane Bernardino compliance with the require- pleted. The CITY will retain AMENDMENT#02-003 Publish:May 2,9,2002 SALE T.S. No..FID-02- Member. This statement County Clerk By:s/MARGIE Place of Hearing: ments of Public Contract 10 percent of each progress • (SIERRA LAKES Publish:May 2,2002 00180-PM Loan No. was filed with the County HUNT/Deputy. City Hall Council Chambers Code Section 22300 and payment as security for SPECIFIC PLAN P.O.#02-0B003 T.S No. 2002-47560 Loan 1000416553 You are in de- Clerk of San Bernardino NOTICE:This fictitious 8353 Sierra Avenue the provisions of the contract completion of the balance of AMENDMENT#3), No.:5778067654 Notice Of fault under a Deed of Trust County on 04/02/2002. 1 name statement expires five Fontana,CA documents pertaining to the work.At the request and GENERAL PLAN CITY OF FONTANA Trustee's Sale Under Deed dated 2/23/2001.Unless you hereby certify that this copy years from the date it was Substitution of Securities. expense of the successful AMENDMENT#0-003,& FONTANA,CALIFORNIA of Trust You are in default take action to protect your is a correct copy of the origi- filed in the office of the Time of Hearing: bidder,the CITY will pay the TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP under a Deed of Trust,Dated property,it may be sold at a nal statement on file in my County Clerk;'A new ficti- 6:00 P.M. Bids must be prepared on amounts so retained upon #15829(TPM#02-002) NOTICE OF PUBLIC September 10,1997,unless public sale. If you need an office. San Bernardino tious business name state- the City provided proposal compliance with the require- HEARING you take action to protect explanation of the nature of County.Clerk By:s/MARGIE ment must be filed before Should you have any ques- forms and completely filled ments of Public Contract Specific Plan Amendment your property,it may be sold the proceeding against you, HUNT/Deputy. • that time. The filing of this tions concerning this project, out in conformance with the Code Section 22300 and #02-003(Sierra Lakes Spe- A MEETING HAS BEEN at a public sale.If you need you should contact a lawyer. NOTICE: This fictitious statement does not of itself please contact H.P. Kang, lnstructons'to Bidders and the provisions of the contract cif ic Plan Amendmeht#3)is ,SCHEDULED BEFORE an explanation of the nature A public auction sale to the' name statementexpires five , authorize the use in this Associate Planner,at(909) all proposal forms must be documents pertaining to an amendment of the Sierra THE CITY COUNCIL OF of the proceeding against highest bidder for cash, years from the date it was state of a fictitious business 350-7692. submitted in a sealed enve- Substitution of Securities: Lakes Specific Plan to THE CITY OF FONTANA you, you should contact a cashier's check drawn on a filed'in the office of the name in violation of the lope plainly marked on the modify the alignment of Si- FOR THE FOLLOWING: lawyer. Notice is hereby state or national bank,check County Clerk. A new ficti rights of another under fed- ANY INTERESTED PARTY outsider "SEALED BID Bids must be prepared on erra Lakes Parkway,modify given that the real property drawn by a state or federal tious business name state- eral, state,or common law MAY APPEAR AND FOR CONSTRUCTION OF the City provided proposal the acreages of Planning TENTATIVE TRACT MAP for which the addressispur- credit union, or a check ment must be filed before (See Section 14400, ET PRESENT ANY INFORMA- SAN SEVAINE CREEK forms and completely filled Areas,20,22,23,24,25,26, #01-015(TRACT 16269) ported to be: 8965 Carob drawn by a state or federal that time. The filing-of this SEQ..,Business and Profes- TION WHICH MAY BE OF BIKE AND RECRE- out in conformance with the and eliminate a 3.6 acre MODIFICATION/WAIVER Street,Fontana,CA 92335, savings and loan'associa- statement does not of itself sions Code). ASSISTANCE TO THE ATIONAL TRAIL,BID NO. Instructions to Bidders and business park,General Plan 1217 Assessor's Parcel. Lion,or savings association, authorize the use in this Publish: May 2,9, 16, 23, PLANNING COMMISSION. • SB-41-02-DO NOT OPEN all proposal forms must be Amendment #02-003 will A Modification/waiver to al- Number: 0233-061-40-0- or savings bank'sperifted in state of a fictitious business 2002 A COPY OF THE APPLICA- WITH REGULAR MAIL". submitted in a sealed enve- modify the General Plan low for irregular/flag lots 000 will be sold at public Section 5102 of the Finan- name in violation of the TION AND ENVIRONMEN- - lope plainly marked on the Land Use Policy Map to re- which do not meet the mini- auction at At the main vial Code and authorized to rights of another under fed- ' TAL DOCUMENTATION IS outside: "SEALED BID fleet the Specific Plan mum lot dimensions for (south)entrance to the City do business in this state will eral,state, or common law AVAILABLE FOR INSPEC- The CITY reserves the right FOR CONSTRUCTION OF Amendment.Tentative Par- 7,200 sq.ft.lots.This project of Chino Civic Center,13220 be held by the duly'ap- (See Section 14400, ET TION IN THE PLANNING to reject any or all bids, to SOUTH HIGHLAND AV- del Map#15829 (Tentative has been filed by Blackmon Central Ave., Chino,CA on pointed trustee as shown SEQ.,Business and Profes- DIVISION,CITY HALL, waive any irregularity,to ac- ENUE AND JUNIPER AV- Parcel Map #02-002) is a Homes, 5/23/2002, at 01:OOPM to below,of all right,title,and sions Code): Has Your cept any bid or portion ENUE SEWER SYSTEM request fora l7-commercial/ the highest bidder, payable interest conveyed to and Publish: May 2,9, 16, 23, • • IF YOU CHALLENGE IN thereof,and to take all bids IMPROVEMENTS,BID NO. residential lot subdivision. Environmental Determina- at the time of sale,for cash now held by the trustee in 2002 F1Ct1t10US COURT ANY ACTION under advisement for a pe- SP-46-02-DO NOT OPEN These projects have been tion:The Environmental Of- or cashier's check drawn by the hereinafter described • Business Name TAKEN CONCERNING A hod of ninety five(95)days. WITH REGULAR MAIL". filed by the Sierra Lakes ficer has reviewed the a state or national bank, a property under and pursuant FICTITIOUS BUSINESS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM, Land Company,LLC. project and made the follow- check drawn by a state or to a Deed of Trust described NAME STATEMENT Expired? YOU MAY BE LIMITED TO At the time of contract The CITY reserves the right ing environmental determi- federal credit union or a below. The sale will be FBN#2002-04494 RAISING ONLY THOSE IS- award,the prime contrac- to reject any br all bids, to Environmental Determina- nation and recommendation: check drawn by a state or made,but without covenantt The following person(s) is Call Margaret SUES YOU OR SOMEONE for shall possess a Class waive any irregularity,to ac- Lion:The Environmental Of- A Negative Declaration will federal savings and loan as- or warranty, expressed Or '(are) doing business as: rr909 822-2231 ELSE RAISED AT THE "A"Contractor's License cept any bid or portion ficer has reviewed the be prepared pursuant to the sociation, savings associa- implied,regarding title,pos- COCO LOCO'S SPORTS- l PUBLIC HEARING DE- or a combination of Class thereof,and to take all bids project and made the follow- requirements of the Califor- Lion,or savings bank speck session, or encumbrances, ROCK CAFE,8411 FOOT- SCRIBED IN THIS NOTICE, "C"license(s),as required under advisement fora pe- ing environmental determi- nia Environmental Quality Pied in section 5102 of the to pay the remaining princi- HILL BLVD, _RANCHO OR IN WRITTEN CORRE- to perform the work, is- nod of ninety five(95)days. nation and recommendation: Act(2001). Financial Code and autho- pal sum of the note(s) se- CUCAMONGA, CA'91730,""' ' SPONDENCE DELIVERED sued by the State of Cali- The project could not have rized to do business in Cali- cured by the Deed of Trust, Mailing Address:2840 SUR- ' TO THE CITY AT, OR fornia. At the time of contract a significant effect on the Location: Bounded by San fornia. The undersigned with interest and late REY WAY, ONTARIO,'CA PRIOR TO, THE PUBLIC award,the prime contrac- environment and a Negative Sevaine Avenue to the west Trustee disclaims any liabil- charges thereon, as pro-.. 91761. VIVA J • HEARING. BY ORDER OF CITY OF for shall possess a Class Declaration.'is recom- and Hemlock Avenue to the ity for any incorrectness of vided in the note(s), ad- MARROQUIN, 2840 SUR- --_ FONTANA "A" or a Class "B" mended per the Local east and divided north and the property address and vances, under the terms of REY WAY, ONTARIO, CA /"�'`� A10 - FONTANA HERALD NEWS Thursday, May 2, 2002 4. Public Notice Advertising Public Notice Advertising ,K Protects Your Right To Know PUBLIC NOTICES Protects Your Right To Know NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S ance(including accrued and court should not grant the SERVICES(ARMS),14143 was conducted•by:An Indi- knowsto be false,is guilty upon filing. Signature/s: County Clerk By:s/MARGIE SALE TS No.: unpaid interest)and reason- authority. SHEPHERD DRIVE, vidual: Began Transacting of a crime. (B&P Code Kenneth Ticich,This state- HUNT/Deputy. 20029117900016 Loan No.: able estimated costs, ex- A HEARING on the petition RANCHO CUCAMONGA, Business on 04/24/2002.BY 17913)Iam also aware that ment was filed with the NOTICE: This fictitious 0006146286 YOU ARE IN penses,and advances at the will be held on June 14,2002 CA 91739.LINDEL FIELDS, SIGNING BELOW, I DE- all information on this County Clerk of San Bernar- namestatementexpiresfive DEFAULT UNDER A DEED time of initial publication of at 8:30 AM in Dept.No.S17 14143 SHEPHERD DRIVE, CLARE THAT ALL INFOR- statement becomes Public dino County on 04/29/2002. years from the date it was OF TRUST DATED 06/25/ this notice. located at351 N.Arrowhead RANCHO CUCAMONGA, MATION IN THIS STATE Record upon filing.Signae I hereby certify that this copy filed in the office of the 1997 UNLESS YOU TAKE Date:April26,2002 Ave. San Bernardino, CA CA 91739. DWAYNE MENT IS TRUE AND COR- ture/s: Daniel Ponce- is a correct copy of the origi- County Clerk. A new ficti- - ACTION TO. PROTECT EXECUTIVE TRUSTEE 92415. FIELDS, - 141432 RECT.'A registrant who Rodriguez. This statement nal statement on file in my tious business name state- YOUR PROPERTY,IT MAY SERVICES,INC. IF YOU OBJECT to the SHEPHARD DRIVE, declares as true informa- was filed with the County office. San Bernardino ment must;be filed before BE SOLD AT A PUBLIC 5455 SAN FERNANDO granting of the petition,you RANCHO CUCAMONGA, tion, which he or she- Clerk of San Bernardino County Clerk By:s/HELEN that time. The filing of this , SALE. IF YOU NEED AN MISSION BLVD should appear at the hear- CA91739.This business is/ knowsto be false,is guilty, County on 04/25/2002. I NUNN/Deputy. statement does not of itself EXPLANATION OF THE SUITE#208 ing and state your objections was conducted by:Husband of a crime. (B&P Code ' herebycertifythatthiscopy NOTICE: This fictitious authorize the use in this r NATURE OF THE PRO- MISSION HILLS,CA 91345 or file written objections with &Wife. Began Transacting 17913)1 am also aware that is a correct copy of the origi- name statement expires five state of a fictitious business i■�'J CEEDINGSAGAINSTYOU, 818-361-6998 the court before the hearing. Business on N/A.BY SIGN- all information on this nal,statement on file in my years from the date it was name in violation of the YOU SHOULD CONTACTA Dee Ortega Your appearance may be in ING BELOW, I DECLARE statement becomes Public office. San Bernardino filed in the office of the rights of another under fed LAWYER.On 05/23/2002 at TRUSTEE SALE OFFICER person or by your attorney. THAT ALL INFORMATION Record upon filing.Signa- County Clerk By:s/MARGIE County Clerk. A new ficti- eral,state,or common law 10:00 A,M.,LoneStar Mort- - 05/02/02, 05/09/02,05/16/ IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR IN THIS STATEMENT IS ture/s: Oscar C Escobar. HUNT/Deputy. tious business name state- (See Section 14400, ET gagee Services, L.L.C., as 02 or a contingent creditor of TRUE AND CORRECT.A Thisstatementwasfiledwith NOTICE: This fictitious ment must be filed before SEQ.,Business and Profes- duly appointed Trustee un- CNS-387720# the deceased,you must file registrant who declares as the County Clerk of San Ber- name statement expires five that time. The filing of this sions Code). t' der and pursuant to Deed of FONTANA HERALD AND your claim with the court and true information,which he nardino County on 04/24/ years from the date it was statement does not of itself Publish: May 2,9, 16,23, Trust recorded 07/08/1997, NEWS mail a copy to the personal or she knows to be false, 2002. Ihereby certify that filed in the office of the authorize the use in this 2002 as Instrument No. representative appointed by is guilty of a crime.(B&P this copy is a correct copy County Clerk. A new ficti- state of a fictitious business 19970241441, of Official NOTICE'S OF TRUSTEE'S the court within four months Code 17913) I am also of the original statement on tious business name,state- name in violation of the FICTITIOUS BUSINESS Records in the office of the SALE Trustee Sale No.74- from the date of first issu- aware that all information file in my office.San Bernar- ment must be filed before rights of another under fed- NAME STATEMENT County Recorder of San 20187-1 Loan No. Title Or- ,ance of letters as provided on this statement be- dino County Clerk By: s/ that time. The filing of this eral, state,or common law FBN#2002-05554 Bernardino County,State of der No. 2700826 APN in Probate Code section comes Public Record CARLA MIMS/Deputy. statement does not of itself (See Section 14400, ET The following person(s) is , California. Executed by 0191-302-16-0-000 YOU 9100. The time for filing upon filing.,Signature/s: NOTICE: This fictitious authorize the use in-this SEQ.,Business s and Profes- (are) doing business as: Steven L.Butler and Nirma ARE IN DEFAULT UNDER claims will not expire before Lindel Fields.This statement name statement expires five state of a fictitious business sions Code). ONE STOP AUTO RECY- • P.Butler,husband and wife A DEED OFTRUST DATED four months from the hear- was filed with the County years'from the date it was name in violation of the Publish: May 2,9, 16,23, CLERS, 10757 CHERRY • - Will sell at public auction to 02/04/1998. UNLESS YOU - ing date noticed above. Clerk of San Bernardino filed in the office of the rights of another under fed- 2002 AVE,FONTANA,CA92337. highest bidder for cash, TAKE ACTION TO PRO- YOU MAY EXAMINE the file County on 04/23/2002. I County Clerk. A new ficti- eral, state,or common law Mailing Address: 11650 cashier's check/cash TECT YOUR PROPERTY, kept by the court.If you are hereby certify that this copy tious business name state- (See Section 14400, ET FICTITIOUS BUSINESS KILLIMORE ' AVE, • - equivalent or other form of IT MAY BE SOLDATA PUB- a person interested in the is a correct copy of the origi- ment must be filed before SEQ.,Business and Profes- NAME STATEMENT NORTHRIDGE,CA791326. , payment authorized by LIC SALE. IF YOU NEED estate,you may file with the nal statement on file in my that time. The filing of this sions Code). FBN#2002-05495 SARKIS S OKJIAN, 11650 2924h(b).(payable at time of AN EXPLANATION OFTHE court a Request for Special office. San Bernardino statement does not of itself Publish: May 2,9,16,23, The following person(s) is KILLIMORE AVE, . sale in lawful money of the NATURE OF THE PRO- Notice(form DE-154)of the County Clerk By:s/CARLA authorize the use in this 2002 (are) doing business as: NORTHRIDGE, CA 91326. United States)At the Main CEEDING AGAINST YOU, filing of an inventory and MIMS/Deputy. state of a fictitious business BARAJAS FAMILY CHILD This business is/was con- Entrance to the County YOU SHOULD CONTACTA appraisal of estate assets or • NOTICE: This fictitious name in violation of the FICTITIOUS BUSINESS CARE, 7339 KAMLOOPS ductedby:AnIndividualBe- Courthouse,351 N. Arrow- -LAWYER. On 05`/23/2002 of any petition or account as name statement expires five rights of another underfed- NAME STATEMENT, AVE,FONTANA,CA92336. gan Transacting Business head Avenue, San Bernar- AT 2:30 p.m. HOUSEKEY provided in Probate Code years from the date it was eral,state,or common law FBN#2002-05362 IRMA BARAJAS, 7339 on N/A. BY SIGNING IBE- dino, CA All right, title and FINANCIAL CORPORA section 1250.A Request for filed in the office of the (See Section 14400, ET The following person(s) is KAMLOOPS AVE, LOW, I DECLARE THAT interest conveyed to and TION as the duly appointed Special Notice form is avail- County Clerk. A new ficti- SEQ.,Business and Profes- (are) doing business as: FONTANA, CA 92336. ALL INFORMATION IN now held by it under said Trustee,under and pursuant able from the court clerk. tious business name state- sions Code). BEST CARPET STEAM- JUAN J BARAJAS, 7339 THIS ,STATEMENT% IS Deed of Trust in the property to Deed of Trust recorded on Attorney for petitioner: ment must be filed before Publish: May 2,9, 16,23, ING,12031 WEEPING WIL- KAMLOOPS AVE, TRUE AND CORRECT A situated in said County and 02/20/1998, Instrument MEGANA RICHMOND ESQ that time. The filing of this 2002 • LOW LANE,FONTANA,CA FONTANA,CA 92336. This registrantwhodeclaresas State described as:As more 19980060735 of official CSBN170753 statement does not of itself 92337. IHAB U EZAR, business is/was conducted true information,which he fully described in the above records in the Office of the GARRISON & MCINNIS authorize the use in this FICTITIOUS BUSINESS 12031 WEEPING WILLOW by:Husband&Wife.Began or she knows to be false,' mentioned Deed of Trust Recorder of San Bernardino LLP state of a fictitious business NAME STATEMENT LANE, FONTANA, CA Transacting Business on 03/ is guilty of a crime.(B&P APN# 0194-092-39 The County,California,executed 2650 CAMINO DEL RIO N name in violation of the FBN#2002-05322 92337.This business is/was 28/2002.BY SIGNING BE- Code 17913) I am also street address and other by Jesus C.Ascencio and STE 108 - rights of another under fed- The following person(s) is conducted by:An Individual. LOW, I DECLARE THAT aware that all information �,./// • common designation,if any, Juana L.Ascencio,husband- SAN dIEGO CA 92108 eral, state,or common law (are) doing business as: BeganTransacting Business ALL INFORMATION IN on this statement be- of the real property de- and wife as joint tenants as Fontana Herald (See Section 14400, ET AGUILAR TRANSPORT, on N/A. BY SIGNING BE- THIS STATEMENT IS comes Public Record scribed above is purported Trustor,New Century Mort- CN644403 BSC11744 May SEQ.,Business and Profes- 1030 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. LOW, I DECLARE THAT; TRUE AND CORRECT.A upon filing.Signature/s: E to be:9359AcaciaAvenue, gage Corporation,aCalifor 2,9,16,2002 . sions Code). PO 209, ONTARIO, CA ALL INFORMATION IN registrantwhodeclaresas SARKIS SIMONE OKJIAN. Fontana,CA 92335 The un- nia Corporation,as Benefi- Publish: May 2, 9, 16,23, 91762. HUGO AGUILAR, THIS STATEMENT IS true information,which he This statement was filed with dersigned Trustee disclaims ciary.WILL SELL AT PUB- FICTITIOUS BUSINESS 2002 1030 N. MOUNTAIN AVE TRUE AND CORRECT.A or she knows to be false, the County Clerk of San Ber ' any liability for any incorrect- LIC AUCTION TO THE NAME STATEMENT PO 209, ONTARIO, CA registrantwhodeclaresas is guilty of a crime.(B&P nardino County on 04/30/ ness of the street address HIGHEST BIDDER FOR FBN#2002-05182 FICTITIOUS BUSINESS 91762.This business is/was true information,which he Code 17913) I am also 2002. I hereby certify that - • and other common designs- CASH (payable at time of The following person(s) is NAME STATEMENT conducted by:An Individual. or she knows to be false, aware that all information this copy is a correct copy tion, if any, shown herein.. sale in lawful money of the (are)-doing business as: FBN#2002-05274 - Began Transacting Business is guilty of a crime.(B&P on this statement be- of the original statement on Said sale will be made,but United States, by cash, a AMERI AIR CONDITION- The following person(s) is on 04/27/2002. BY SIGN- Code 17913) I am also -comes Public Record file in my office.San Bernar- without covenant or war- cashier's check drawn by a ING & HEATING, 7642 (are) doing business as: ING BELOW, I DECLARE aware that all information upon filing.Signature/s: dino County Clerk By: s/ ,. ranty,expressed or implied, state or national bank, a KEMPSTER AVENUE, EMPIRE MEDIA GROUP, THAT,ALL INFORMATION on this statement be- Irma Barajas.This statement HELEN NUNN/Deputy:. regarding title, possession, check drawn by a state or FONTANA,CA92336.Mail- 869 E. FOOTHILL BLVD. IN THIS STATEMENT IS' comes Public Record was filed with the County NOTICE: This fictitious or encumbrances,to pay the federal credit union, or a ing Address:POST OFFICE SUITE N1, UPLAND, CA TRUE AND CORRECT.A upon filing. Signature/s: Clerk of San Bernardino namestatementexpiresfive remaining principal sum of check drawn by a state or BOX 2242, FONTANA,CA 91786. Mailing Address: registrantwhodeclaresas IHAB EZAR.This statement County on 04/29/2002. I years from the date it'was the note(s)secured by said federal savings and loan as- 92336. AMERI ENTER- 15051 GRANITE PEAK true information,which he was filed with the County hereby certify that this copy filed in the office of the Deed of Trust,with interest sociation, savings associa- • PRISES CORPORATION, AVE.,FONTANA,CA92336. or she knows to be false, Clerk of San Bernardino is a correct copy of the origi- County Clerk. A new;ficti- thereon,as provided in said tion,or savings bank speci- 7642 KEMPSTERAVENUE, GEORGE L MARTIN,15051 is guilty of a crime.(B&P County on 04/25/2002. I nal statement on file in my tious business name state- _ note(s), advances, if any, fied in section 5102 of the FONTANA,CA92336. This GRANITE PEAK AVE., Code'17913) I am also herebycertifythatthiscopy office. San Bernardino ment must be filed before • under the terms of said Deed Financial Code and autho- business is/was conducted FONTANA,CA 92336.This aware that all information is a correct copy of the origi- County Clerk By:s/MARGIE that time. The filing of this • of Trust,fees,charges and rized to do business in this by: A Corporation ,...Al# business is/was conducted on this statement be- nal statement on file in my HUNT/Deputy. statement does not of itself • expenses of the Trustee and state).At:the main entrance 2425228 State:CA.Began by: An Individual. Began comes Public Record office. San Bernardino NOTICE: This fictitious authorize the use inithis of the trusts created by said to the County Courthouse Transacting Business on N/ Transacting Business on N/ upon filing. Signature/s: County Clerk By:s/MARGIE name statement expires five state of a fictitious business Deed of Trust. The total 351 North Arrowhead, San A.BY SIGNING BELOW,I A.BY SIGNING BELOW,I HUGO AGUILAR. This HUNT/Deputy, • years from the date it was name in violation of'the amount of the unpaid bal- Bernardino, CA, all right, DECLARE THAT ALL IN- DECLARE THAT ALL IN- statement was filed with the NOTICE: This fictitious filed in the office of the rights of another under fed ance of the obligation se- title and interest conveyed to FORMATION IN THIS FORMATION IN THIS County Clerk Of San Bernar- namestatementexpiresfive County Clerk. A new ficti- eral,state, or,bommon'iaw cured by the property to be and now held by it under STATEMENT IS TRUE AND STATEMENT IS TRUE AND dino County on 04/25/2002. years from the date it was tious business name state- (See Section 14400,.ET sold and reasonable esti- said Deed of Trust in the CORRECT. A registrant CORRECT A registrant Iherebyceltifyttlat this copy filed in the office of,the ment must be filed before SEQ.,BusinessandProfes- mated costs,expenses and property situated in said who declares as true infor- who declares as true infor- is a correct copy of the origi- County Clerk. A new ficti- that time. The filing of this sions Code). advances at the time of the County,California describing mation, which he or she mation, which he or she nal statement on file in my tious business name state- statement does not of itself Publish: May 2, 9, 16,23, initial publication of the No- the land therein:AS MORE knowsto be false,is guilty knowsto be false,is guilty office. San Bernardino ment must be filed before authorize the use in this 2002 tice of Sale is:$91,635.51 FULLY DESCRIBED IN THE of a crime.(B&P Code of a crime. (B&P Code County Clerk By:s/CARLA that time. The filing of this state of a fictitious business The beneficiary under said ABOVE MENTIONED 17913)Iam also aware that 17913)Iamalsoawarethat MIMS/Deputy. statement does not of itself name in violation of the FICTITIOUS BUSINESS Deed of Trust heretofore ex- DEED OF TRUST. The all information on this all information on this NOTICE: This fictitious authorize the use in this rights of another under fed- NAME STATEMENTT • ecuted and delivered to the.. property;heretofore de- statement becomes Public S statement becomes Public name statement expires five ''state of a fictitious business eral`state,or common laW FBN#2002-05575 '--— , i ,4 0.. ET The followindiperson(s) is °Y„ ^`' :t` .• _tla>a (See Section 1 unde"rsigned a'w7itten Ded=":=si'ribe"d,is'1ii3ing sowd-`a's`is'. ``Record UpDh filing:Signa Recor�:upon filing.Si�na- years from the date it was name in violation of e r T i/ � Tr - --laration of Default arid De=-.The streetaddressandother ture/s. ,:,,. ,., ANTONIO,:,tore/s ,GEORGE L.,,MAR- filed in the office of the,--,rights of anotherunder.�fed , SEQ.,Businessand,Profes (are) doing bpsme.ssws. x,.. .ii..t T mend for Sale,and a written common designation,if any, SERRANO, PRESIDENT TIN.This statement was filed County Clerk. A new ficti eral, state,or common law sions Code): VALLEY ORNAMENTAL V, Notice of Default and Elec- of the real property de- Thisstatementwasfiledwith with the County Clerk of San tious business name state- (See Section 14400, ET Publish: May 2,9, 16,23, IRON, 1700 W. FOOTHILL tion to Sell.The undersigned scribed above is purported the County Clerk of San Ber- Bernardino County on 04/ ment must be filed before SEQ.,Business and Profes- 2002 BLVD,UPLAND,CA 91786. caused said Notice of De- to be: 8818 South Nuevo nardino County on 04/22/ 24/2002.1 herebycertifythat that time. The filing of this sions Code). JOHN J ANDERSON,1700 fault and Election to Sell to Avenue,Fontana,CA 92335 2002. I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy statement does.not of itself Publish: May 2,9, 16,23, FICTITIOUS BUSINESS W. FOOTHILL BLVD;UP- be recorded in the county The undersigned Trustee this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on authorize the use in this 2002 NAME STATEMENT LAND, CA 91786. This . . where the real property is disclaims any liability for any of the original statement on file in my office.San Bemar- state of a fictitious business ' FBN#2002-05521 business is/was conducted located. LoneStar Mort-- incorrectness of the street file in my office.San Bernar-, dino County Clerk By: s/ name in violation of the FICTITIOUS BUSINESS The following person(s) is by: An Individual. Began , gagee Services,L.L.C.is a and other common designa- dino County Clerk By: s/ CARLA MIMS/Deputy. rights of another under fed- NAME STATEMENT (are) doing business as: Transacting Business on 03/ debt collector attempting to tion, if any, shown herein. MARGIE HUNT/Deputy. NOTICE: This fictitious era', state,or common law FBN#2002-05362 MAURICE PATTERSON 21/1971.BY SIGNING BE- collect a debt.Any informa- Said sale will be made,but NOTICE: This fictitious namestatementexpiresfive (See Section 14400, ET The following person(s) is TRUCKING, 8088 OASIS LOW, I DECLARE THAT tionobtainedwillbeusedfor without covenant or war- namestatementexpiresfive years from the date it was SEQ.,BusinessandProfes- (are) doing business as: STREET, FONTANA, CA ALL INFORMATION IN that purpose. Date: 05/02/ ranty,expressed or implied, years from the date it was filed in the office of the sions Code). BEST CARPET STEAM- 92336. MAURICE P THIS STATEMENT IS 2002 First American Lend- regarding title, possession, filed in the office of-the County Clerk. A new ficti- Publish: May 2, 9, 16,23, ING,12031 WEEPING WIL- PATTERSON,8088 OASIS TRUE AND CORRECT. A , ers Advantage, LoneStar or encumbrances,to pay the County Clerk. Anew ficti- tious business name state- 2002 LOW LANE,FONTANA,CA STREET, FONTANA, CA registrant who declaresras Mortgagee Services,L.L.C., remaining principal sum of tious business name state- ment must be filed before 92337. IHAB U EZAR, 92336.This business is/was true information,which he . 3 First American Way,Santa the note(s)secured by said ment must be filed before that time. The filing of this FICTITIOUS BUSINESS 12031 WEEPING WILLOW conducted by:an Individual. or she knowsto be false, . . - Ana, CA 92707 Ricardo Deed of Trust,with interest that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself NAME STATEMENT LANE, FONTANA, CA Began Transacting Business is guilty of a crime.(B&P JuarezAuthorized Signature thereon,as provided in said statement does not of itself authorize the use in this FBN#2002-05326 92337.This business is/was on 01/22/2002.BY SIGN- Code 17913) I am also For Trustee's Sale informs- note(s) advances, if any, authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business The following person(s)is conducted by:An Individual. ING BELOW, I DECLARE aware that all information tion please call 925-603- under the terms of said Deed state of a fictitious business name in violation of the (are) doing business as: BeganTransacting Business THAT ALL INFORMATION on this statement be- 7342 RSVP#38770 05/02/ of Trust, estimated fees, name in violation of the rights of another under fed- AFFINITY GIFTS, 16050 on N/A. BY SIGNING BE- IN THIS STATEMENT IS comes Public Record 02 05/09/02 05/16/02 charges and expenses of rights of another under fed- eral, state,or common law JACKSON DR,FONTANA, LOW, I DECLARE THAT TRUE AND CORRECT. A upon filing. Signature/s: the Trustee and of the trusts eral, state,or common law (See Section 14400, ET CA 92336.Mailing Address: ALL INFORMATION IN registrantwhodeclaresas JOHN ANDERSON. This NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S created by said Deed of (See Section 14400, ET SEQ.,Business and Profes- P.O.BOX 1363,'FONTANA, THIS STATEMENT IS true information,which he statement was filed with the SALE Trust,to-wit: $41,215.05 SEQ.,Business and Profes- sions Code). CA 92334. TONY JAMES TRUE AND CORRECT A or she knows to be false, County Clerk of San BernaP- TS.No,GM-60331-C (Estimated)Accrued interest sions Code). Publish: May 2, 9, 16, 23, ;GEORGE, 16050 JACK- registrantwhodeclaresas is guilty of a crime,(B&P dino County on 04/30/2002. A Loan No.010487320 and additional advances, if Publish: May 2, 9, 16,23, 2002 SON DR., FONTANA, CA true information,which he Code 17913) I am also I hereby certify that this copy YOU ARE IN DEFAULT UN- any,will increase this figure 2002 - 92336.This business is/was or she knowsto be false, aware that all information is a correct copy of the origi- DER A DEED OF TRUST prior to sale.The beneficiary FICTITIOUS BUSINESS conducted by:An Individual. is guilty of a crime,(B&P. on this statement be- nal statement on file in my DATED 3/4/97. UNLESS under said Deed of Trust, FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT Began Transacting Business Code 17913) I am also comes Public Record office. San Bernardino YOU TAKE ACTION TO heretofore executed and de- NAME STATEMENT ' FBN#2002-05288 on N/A. BY SIGNING BE- aware that all information upon filing. Signature/s: County Clerk By:s/MARGIE . PROTECT YOUR PROP- livered to the undersigned a FBN#2002-05202 The following person(s) is LOW, I DECLARE THAT on this statement be- MAURICE PATTERSON. HUNT/Deputy. ERTY;IT MAY BE SOLD AT written Declaration of De- The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: ALL INFORMATION IN comes Public Record Thisstatementwasfiledwith NOTICE: This fictitious A PUBLIC SALE. IF YOU fault and Demand for Sale, (are) doing business as: ESCOBAR TRUCKING, THIS STATEMENT IS. upon filing. Signature/s: the County Clerk of San Ber- namestatementexpiresfive NEED AN EXPLANATION and written Notice of Default RANCHO HYE MARKET 8144 CYPRESS AVE, TRUE AND CORRECT.A IHAB EZAR.This statement nardino County on 04/29/ years from the date it was OF.THE NATURE OF THE and Election to Sell The AND DELI, 7172 FONTANA,CA 92335.OS- registrantwhodeclaresas was filed with the County 2002. I hereby certify that filed in the office of the' PROCEEDING AGAINST undersigned caused said ARCHIBALD AVE, CAR.C ESCOBAR, 8144 true information,which he Clerk of San Bernardino this copy is a correct copy County Clerk. A new ficti- YOU,YOU SHOULD CON- Notice of Default and Elec- RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CYPRESS AVE,FONTANA, or she knows to be false, County on 04/25/2002. I of the original statement on tious business name state' TACT A LAWYER. Lion to Sell to be recorded in -CA 91730. ABBAS CA 92335.This business is/ is guilty of a crime.(B&P 'hereby certify that this copy file in my office.San Bernar- ment must be filed before A public auction sale to the the county where the real MADADIFAR,450 W FOOT- was conducted by:An Indi- Code 17913) I am also is a correct copy of the origi- -dino County Clerk By: s/ that time. The filing of this highest bidder for,cash, property is located and more HILL BLVD APT 8, vidual. Began Transacting aware that all information nal statement on file in my MARGIE HUNT/Deputy. statement does not of itself L cashier's check drawn on a than three months have POMONA,CA 91767. This Business on 04/24/2002.BY on this statement be- office. San Bernardino NOTICE: This fictitious authorize the use in this state or national bank,check elapsed since such recorda- business is/was conducted SIGNING BELOW, I BE comes Public Record County Clerk By:s/MARGIE namestatementexpiresfive state of a fictitious business drawn by a state or federal tion. DATE: 4/26/02 by: An Individual. Began CLARE THAT ALL INFOR- upon filing. Signature/s: HUNT/Deputy. years from the date it was name in violation of the credit union, or a check HOUSEKEY FINANCIAL Transacting Business on 04/ MATION IN THIS STATE TONY J. GEORGE. This NOTICE: This fictitious filed in the office of the rights of another under fed- drawn by a state or federal CORPORATION P.O. Box 22/2002.BY SIGNING BE MENT IS TRUE AND COR- statement was filed with the name statement expires five County Clerk. A new ficti- eral, state,or common law savings and loan associa- 640145 CITY OF INDUS- LOW,I DECLARE THAT RECT, A registrant who County Clerk of San Bernar- years from the date it was tious business name state- (See Section 14400, ET tion,or savings association, TRY, CA 91716-0145 For ALL INFORMATION IN declares as true informa- dino County on 04/25/2002. filed in the office of the ment must be filed before SEQ.,Business and Probes-- or savings bank specified in Sale Information: :909-397- THIS STATEMENT IS tion, which he or she I hereby certify that,this copy County Clerk. A new ficti- that time. The filing of this, sions Code). Section 5102 of the Finan- 3047 Sherron R.Ferguson, TRUE AND CORRECT A knowsto be false,is guilty is a correct copy of the origi- tious business name state- statement does not of itself Publish: May 2, 9, 16,23,. cial Code and authorized to Assistant Secretary registrantwhodeclaresas of a crime..(B&P Code nal statement on file in my ment must be filed before . authorize the use in this 2002 do business in this state,will TAC#477056B PUB::5/02,5/ true information,which he 17913)1 am also aware that office. San Bernardino that time. The filing of this state of a fictitious business be held by the duly ap- 09,5/16- or she knows to be false, all information on this County Clerk By:s/MARGIE- statement does not of itself name in violation of the NOTICE OF SALE OF pointed trustee.The sale will is guilty of a crime.(B&P statement becomes Public HUNT/Deputy. authorize the use in this rights of another under fed- ' AUTOMOBILES . be made;but without coy- NOTICE OF PETITION TO Code 17913) I am also Record upon filing.Signs- NOTICE: This fictitious state of a fictitious business eral, state,or common law Notice is hereby given pur= enant or warranty, ex- ADMINISTER ESTATE OF aware that all information ture/s: Oscar C Escobar. name statement expires five name in violation of the (See Section 14400,-ET suant to sections 3071, • pressed or implied,regard- DOROTHY E.KING on this statement be- This statement was filed with years from the date it was rights of another under fed- SEQ.,Business and Profes- 3072,of the civil code of the ing title,possession,or en- Case No.SPRSSO4720 comes Public Record the County Clerk.of San Ber- filed in the office of the eral, state, or common law sions Code). State of California, the en- cumbrances, to satisfy the To all heirs, beneficiaries, upon filing. Signature/s: nardino County on 04/24/ County Clerk. A new ficti- (See Section 14400, ET Publish: May 2, 9, 16, 23, dersigned will sell at public obligation secured by said creditors, contingent credi- ABBAS MADADIFAR.This 2002. I hereby certify that tious business name state- SEQ.,Business and Profes- 2002 auction at the respective Deed of Trust.The under- tors,and persons who may statement was filed with the this copy is a correct copy ment must be filed before sions Code). - said addresses at 10 AM on - signed Trustee disclaims otherwise be interested in County Clerk of San Bernar- of the original statement on that time. The filing of this Publish: May 2, 9, 16, 23, FICTITIOUS BUSINESS 05/13/02 the following ye- any liability for any incorrect- the will or estate,or both,of dino County on 04/23/2002. file in my office:San Bernar- statement does not of itself 2002 NAME STATEMENT hicles,property and to wit: • nessofthepropertyaddress DOROTHY E.KING I hereby certify that this copy dino County Clerk By: s/ authorize the use in this FBN#2002-05539 96 HYU VN, VIN#, or other common designa- A PETITION FOR PRO- is a correct copy of the origi- CARLA MIMS/Deputy. state of a fictitious business FICTITIOUS BUSINESS The following person(s) is 3H3V532C3WT044024, Has Maur tion,if any,shown herein; BATE has been filed by Alice nal statement on file in my NOTICE: This fictitious name in violation of the NAME STATEMENT (are) doing business as: LIC# 526JKS NV,. at" TRUSTOR: JESUS F. Philpot in the Superior office. San Bernardino namestatementexpiresfive rights of another under fed FBN#2002-05494 BTE FUEL STOP, 10002 VALENCIANO'S TRUCK SAUCEDO, A MARRIED Court of California, County County'Clerk By:s/CARLA years from the date it was eral, state, or common law The following person(s)is ALMOND AVE; FONTANA, REPAIR, 11191 CATAWBA FictitiioillS MAN AS HIS SOLE AND of SAN BERNARDINO. - MIMS/Deputy. filed in the office of the (See Section 14400, ET (are) doing business as: CA 92335. KHALED AVE,FONTANA,CA i - - SEPARATE PROPERTY THE PETITION FOR PRO- NOTICE: This fictitious County Clerk. A new ficti- SEQ.,Business and Profes- THE SPEED SHOP, 1302 OTHMAN,10002ALMOND The following to be sold on ,. Recorded 3/13/97 as Instru- BATE requests that Alice F. namestatementexpiresfive tious business name state- sions Code). MONTE VISTA AVE, STE AVE,FONTANA,CA92335. 5-16-02 at 10AM: `'I�aSS ment No. 19970085820 in Philpot be appointed as per- years from the date it was ment must be filed before Publish`. May 2, 9, 16,23, #4, UPLAND, CA 91786. This business is/was con- 95 UTILITY VA, VIN# BllII Book , page of Official sonal representative to ad- filed in the office of the that time. The filing of this 2002 Mailing Address:9449YEW ducted by: An Individual: 1 UYVS2537SU244725, Records in the office of the minister the estate of the County Clerk. A new ficti- statement does not of itself ST, RANCHO Began Transacting Business LIC#T87361 IL Name Recorder of SAN BERNAR- decedent. tious business name state- authorize the use in this, FICTITIOUS BUSINESS CUCAMONGA,CA 91730. on 04/30/2002. BY SIGN- 95 UTILITY VA, VIN# DINO County,California, THE PETITION requests ment must be filed before state of a fictitious business NAME STATEMENT KENNETH P TICICH,9449 ING BELOW, I DECLARE 1 UYVS2532SU244602,- Date of Sale: 5/23/2002 at- .authority to administer the that time. The filing of this name in violation of the FBN#2002-05347 YEW ST, RANCHO THAT ALL INFORMATION LIC#T85830 IL,at UTILITY Expired? - 12:00 PM estate under the Indepen- statement does not of itself rights of another under fed- The following person(s) is CUCAMONGA, CA 91730. IN THIS STATEMENT IS TRAILER SALES :;CO, Place of Sale: AT THE dent Administration of Es- authorize the use in this eral, state, or common law (are)doing business as:DI- JASON E MILLS,311 JULIA TRUE AND CORRECT A 15567 VALLEY BL, NORTH ARROWHEAD AV-, tates Act.(This authority will state of a fictitious business (See Section 14400, ET RECT PERSONNEL,311 N. CT., UPLAND, CA 91784. registrant who declares as FONTANA,CA l ENUE ENTRANCE TO THE allow the personal represen- name in violation of the SEQ.,Business and Profes- EUCLID`AVE:; ONTARIO, This business is/was con- true information,which he Said sales are the purpose COUNTY COURTHOUSE, tative to take many actions rights of another under fed- sions Code). • CA 91762. DANIEL E ducted by:A General Part- or she knowsto be false, of satisfying liens for:the un- 351 NORTH ARROWHEAD without obtaining court ap- eral, state,or common law Publish: May 2, 9, 16, 23, PONCE-RODRIGUEZ, nership.Began Transacting is guilty of a crime.(B&P dersigned for towing, stor- Call AVENUE, SAN BERNAR- proval.Before taking certain (See Section 14400, ET 2002 1310 S. DIAMOND BAR Business on N/A.BY SIGN- Code 17913) I am also age,labor,material and lien DINO,CALIFORNIA very important actions,how- SEQ.,Business and Profes- BLVD.#B,DIAMOND BAR, ING BELOW, I DECLARE aware that all information charges together with adver- Property Address is pur- ever,the personal represen- sions Code). FICTITIOUS BUSINESS CA 91765.This business is/ THAT ALL INFORMATION on this statement be- tising and expense`of sales Margaret . .__. _... .... .. -- --.. ,. .n ,.,. w,ww.r rrn-rrw.Gw1T ,.,..•.n•:n•1.,n1n,J 1,,,•A.,Indi_ IM TUIC CTATP IIAPAIT IQ rnmac Pnhiic Racerd riateri ns/n2/n7 - b RE: ,reotechnical Services for South Highland Sewer Page 1 of 3 NIolg I I I * 1 close • From: Torn Holliman [SMTP:tomh@assoc-eng.com] To: Harvilla, George Cc: Subject: RE: Geotechnical Services for South Highland Sewer Sent: 4/30/02 7:28 PM Importance: Normal Thanks George - we'll start finalizing the scope and proposal, we should be able to meet your mid-may deadline. Let me know if you have any questions. Tom H. Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 3:05 PM To: 'tomh@assoc-eng.com' Subject: FW: Geotechnical Services for South Highland Sewer Tom, Yousuf sent me the Scope of Services from a City RFP. Unfortunately, it is very general. You will have to assume a reasonable number of tests. I just faxed it to you. George Original Message From: Harvilla, George To: 'ypatanwala@fontana.org' Cc: 'tomh@assoc-eng.com' Sent: 4/25/02 2:00 PM Subject: FW: Geotechnical Services for South Highland Sewer Yousuf, A followup to my previous e-mail.... http://mail.pbworldnet.com/exchange/forms/IPM/NOTE/read.asp?command=op... 4/30/2002 RE: ,Geotechnical Services for South Highland Sewer Page.2 of 3 George Original Message From: Tom Holliman To: 'Harvilla, George' Sent: 4/25/02 1:57 PM Subject: RE: Geotechnical Services for South Highland Sewer Hi George, To help Yousuf understand what I need here is a little expounding on the topic. Agencies that provide the geotechnical services normally have a standard list of services they require. Example, compaction tests every 25 feet at each 2 foot lift per ASTM 1556, soil moisture curves assume X curves, since the area is fairly small it's unlikely there will be a significant difference in soil conditions from one end to the other, samples on the backfill sand. Compaction monitoring to verify the work is being done properly - from a soils perspective. A final certification report. Review contractor's hazardous material plan - in case they hit contaminated soil during excavation. Hope this helps. Tom Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 10:37 AM To: 'ypatanwala@fontana.org' Cc: 'torah@assoc-eng.com'; 'cpursel@fontana.org' Subject: Geotechnical Services for South Highland Sewer Yousuf, The City recently asked Associated Engineers to provide a Geotechnical Engineer during construction of the South Highland Sewer. Associated needs some sample text for their subconsultant agreement with the geotechnical engineer (tests required, etc). Do you have a samples of Geotechnical http://mail.pbworldnet.com/exchange/forms/IPM/NOTE/read.asp?command=op... 4/30/2002 RE: ,Geotechnical Services for South Highland Sewer Page 3 of 3 RFP's on electronic format that might be helpful? Can you e-mail this directly to Tom Holliman at Associated (torah@assoc-eng.com) and copy me? Thanks, George Harvilla http://mail.pbworldnet.com/exchange/forms/IPM/NOTE/read.asp?command=op... 4/30/2002 SCOPE OF SERVICES Provisions of Geotechnical services as required depending on the nature of the project and the project specifications. The tests related to surface and subsurface Exploration 7 Laboratory Investigation will be performed on latest approved standards from recognized agencies and re,lated to the work. The nature of such Geotechnical services as expected,but not limited to,may consist of the following: 1. Site Investigation 2. Soil Analysis 3. Soil Improvement ' 4. Foundation Engineering 5. Earth retaining structures and excavations 6. Ground water control 7. Optimum soil moisture density test 8. In place soil densities test 9. Sand equivalent test 10. Sieve Analysis 11. R-value 12. Concrete Mix Design 13. Concrete Compression Test 14. Concrete Slump Test 15. Asphalt Core Density 16. Pavement Design 17. Field Observation 18. The Consultant may be called upon to attend meetings during any phase of the work to render technical advice to the City. The Consultant is expected to provide the lead role in providing the testing services under the general direction of the inspector and engineer as appropriate. The Consultant will be expected to provide the services required within twenty-four hours of the City Engineer or his authorized representative's request. Results of the testes shall be made available immediately in the field (where applicable) and followed by final reports within 48 hours after performance of the tests. 34 FAX moo PARSONS 16689 Foothill Boulevard BRINCKERHOFF Suite 103 Fontana, CA 92335 909-427-9166 Fax:909-427-9169 harvilla@pbworld.com To: From: George Harvilla Date: (�.. 7 o o '2... Project No.: Fax No.: q y/ D 4'l l No. of Pages (including this page): 2 Subject: /1 / / t- 'ryr ✓' (�Po 7Le c4 fce oe v ?� �Pram.i ce,/ Comments: .5; c .�-i • Over a Century of Engineering Excellence RESPONSE REQUESTED South Highland Sewer CM Page 1 of 1 ° H! ? ? close From: Harvilla, George To: 'tomh@assoc-eng.com'; 'ypatanwala@fontana.org' Cc: 'rbragg@fontana.org'; 'cpursel@fontana.org' Subject:. South Highland Sewer CM Sent: 4/29/02 8:09 PM Importance: Normal Tom, We need to have the City Council approve Associated's Construction Management Amendment for the South Highland Sewer on June 4. Please submit your revised costs (including geotechnical services) by mid-May. Yousuf - Tom still needs your input on the geotechnical scope per my e-mails to you last week. Thanks! George Harvilla • http://mail.pbworldnet.com/exchange/forms/IPM/NOTE/read.asp?command=op... 4/30/2002 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 E. Shelby Street Ontario, CA 91764 (909) 980-1982 Fax (909) 941-0891 To: City of Fontana Date: April 29, 2002 8353 Sierra Avenue ) €19c.1eer-i Vtiq Project: So th-Highland Avenue Juniper Fontana, CA 92335 Avenue S er System l , provements SP-46-01 Job Nu er: 01-064 Attention: Mr. George Harvilla Project Manager Manager VIA: • U.S. MAIL ■ UPS ■ AE DELIVERY ■ FEDEX Copies Date No. Description 2 Sheets Final Sewer Plans (Sheet 8 & 9 , Originals) 1 Final Specifications C C' ,. i This is sent: Ai For Your Approval ■ Per Your Request • For Your Information ■ For Your Review and Comment • For Your Use Al For Signature Remarks: Enclosed are Final Sewer Plans Sheet No. 8 & 9 in Mylar. Thanks, r By: Tom R. Holliman, P.E., Senior Project Manager IN.) 01/4+1 Copy— File ■ Copy - ■ Copy - II Copy - R. OF TRANSMITTAL Associated EngineersLETTEc , In . 1 L 3311 E. Shelby Street Ontario, CA 91764 (909) 980-1982 Fax (909) 941-0891 To: City of Fontana Date: April 29, 2002 (Hand Deliver) Project: S. Highland/Juniper Sewer Job Number: 01-064 Attention: Mr. George Harvilla Ref: VIA: O U.S. MAIL l I UPS O AE DELIVERY O OTHER Copies Date No. Description 1 set Contract Documents 1 Engineer's Estimate Request This is sent: ( 1 For Your Approval O Per Your Re q I ) For Your Information 0 For Your Review and Comment I ) For Your Use Li For Signature Remarks: By: Tom Holliman, PE, Senior Project Manager Q Copy— File O Copy - Li Copy - O Copy - iTR OF TRANSMITTAL Associated EngineerLET k s, I, ncE . 3311 E. Shelby Street • Ontario, CA 91764 (909) 980-1982 Fax (909) 941-0891 To: City of Fontana Date: April 23, 2002 8353 Sierra Avenue Project: South Highland Avenue Juniper Fontana, CA 92335 Avenue Sewer System Improvements SP-46-01 Job Number: 01-064 Attention: Mr. Todd Miller Plan Checker VIA: ■ U.S. MAIL ■ UPS ■ AE DELIVERY • FEDEX Copies Date No. Description 14 90% Sewer Plans &Traffic Control Plans (Redlined) Sheets 14 100% Sewer Plans & Traffic Control Plans (Redlined) 1 Specifications (Redlined) I 1 Engineer's Estimate (Redlined) This is sent: ■ For Your Approval 4 Per Your Request j ■ For Your Information ■ For Your Review and Comment 4 For Your Use ■ For Signature Rem rks: I Enclosed are 90% & 100% Markups plans per Mr. George Harbilla's request Some of the markups on 100% submittals were done by us. Thanks, By: Elias A. Busue , Jr. II, Civil Engineering Designer -Copy— File ■ Copy - ■ Copy - II Copy - LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL flAssociated Engineers, Inc. II3311 E. Shelby Street • Ontario, CA 91764 (909) 980-1982 Fax (909) 941-0891 To: City of Fontana Date: April 22, 2002 8353 Sierra Avenue Project: South Highland Avenue Juniper Fontana, CA 92335 Avenue Sewer System Improvements SP-46-01 Job Number: 01-064 Attention: -Mr. Geet e-FFawilla /G.4,, Q ,far,�,/®yea/ Pfejeet-Man g€-. c - r 6fezo;,te-eP. VIA: • U.S. MAIL ■ UPS ■ AE DELIVERY • FEDEX Copies Date No. Description 14 Final Sewer &Traffic Control Plans (1 set of Originals) Sheets 1 Final Specifications 1 Final Engineer's Estimate This is sent: Al For Your Approval ■ Per Your Request ■ For Your Information ■ For Your Review and Comment ■ For Your Use For Signature Remarks: Enclosed are our Final Sewer Plans & Traffic Control Plans in Mylar. Thanks, By: Tom R. Holliman, P.E., Senior Project Manager II Copy— File ■ Copy - IN Copy - ■ Copy RE: South Highland Sewer Plans Update Page 1 of 2 r54) 1001 .s07 11 G ( " E ? Claw,`; From: Ray Bragg [SMTP:rbragg@fontana.org] To: 'Harvilla, George' e4.'4P ln`- Q...K. Cc: Subject: RE: South Highland Sewer Plans Update Sent: 4/17/02 2:50 PM Importance: Normal Ricardo: How did it happen that Traffic was never sent the traffic control plans for review? Once plans are submitted to the City for review, the "internal distribution" process should take over. It can't be the applicant's responsibility as the applicant typically has no knowledge of what the City's process might be. Ray Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Tuesday, April.16, 2002 7:11 PM To 'rbragg@fontana.org'; 'cpursel@fontana.org' Subject: South Highland Sewer Plans Update Importance: High Ray/Carla, Carla forwarded the South Highland Sewer plans to Yousuf today to get Ricardo's signature. Ricardo had about a dozen comments, so a meeting was held at 4:00 today to discuss them. Attendees were Eric Lewis, Felipe, Yousuf, Todd Miller, Tom Holliman from Associated Engineers, and me. It came to light that during the two plan checks by the city, the Traffic Control Plans had had never been sent to the Traffic Section for review. Eric questioned the entire traffic control plan. He suggested that Walnut, and then Juniper be completely shut down instead of using flagman to keep one lane of traffic open on these narrow streets. Others at the meeting had additional comments on the plans and specifications. Tom Holliman thinks he can make the revisions by the end of the week, and then submit mylars. Ricardo has to sign the mylars, not vellums. If Ricardo signs the plans on Friday or Monday, we can still print next Tuesday and Wednesday. The bid period starts next Thursday. We will have to get Council approval for the street closures sometime during May or June, prior to construction starting on July 1. http://mail.pbworldnet.com/exchange/forms/IPM/NOTE/read.asp?comr 4/17/2002 South Highland Sewer Plans Update Page 1 of 1 r+' 1 I l vn I x I t Close From: Harvilla, George To: 'rbragg@fontana.org'; 'cpursel@fontana.org' Cc: Subject: South Highland Sewer Plans Update Sent: 4/16/02 10:10 PM Importance: High Ray/Carla, Carla forwarded the South Highland Sewer plans to Yousuf today to get Ricardo's signature. Ricardo had about a dozen comments, so a meeting was held at 4:00 today to discuss them. Attendees were Eric Lewis, Felipe, Yousuf, Todd Miller, Tom Holliman from Associated Engineers, and me. It came to light that during the two plan checks by the city, the Traffic Control Plans had had never been sent to the Traffic Section for review. Eric questioned the entire traffic control plan. He suggested that Walnut, and then Juniper be completely shut down instead of using flagman to keep one lane of traffic open on these narrow streets. Others at the meeting had additional comments on the plans and specifications. Tom Holliman thinks he can make the revisions by the end of the week, and then submit mylars. Ricardo has to sign the mylars, not vellums. If Ricardo signs the plans on Friday or Monday, we can still print next Tuesday and Wednesday. The bid period starts next Thursday. We will have to get Council approval for the street closures sometime during May or June, prior to construction starting on July 1. http://mail.pbworldnet.com/exchange/forms/IPM/NOTE/read.asp?comr 4/17/2002 Next: Ord. 1374 Res.2002-46 CITY OF FONTANA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING APRIL 16, 2002 Information in shaded boxes also pertains to meetings directly following the Council Meeting. Welcome to a meeting of the Fontana City Council A complete agenda packet is located in the binder on the table in the lobby of the Council Chambers To address the Council, please fill out a card located at the microphone stand indicating your desire to speak on either a specific agenda item or under Public Communications and give it to the City Clerk. Your name will be called when it is your turn to speak In compliance with Americans with.Disabilities Act,the Chambers is wheel chair accessible and a portable • microphone is available 5:00 P.M. WORKSHOP A. Agenda Review B. Presentation from the Code Compliance Department Regarding Illegal Posting of Signs on Edison Poles. (Ted Porlas and Frank Schuma, Community Development Department) C. Traffic/Pedestrian Issues at Long Elementary School (Hunter's Ridge) (Police Chief Frank Scialdone) D. City Manager Comments 6:00 P.M. CLOSED SESSION: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTON 54956.9 Fontana Empire Center L.L.C., et al v City of Fontana et al CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL- EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 The Forecast Group L.P., v City of Fontana et al Case No. SCVSS086260 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.95 Worker's Compensation Claim: Russell Reese 7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL: Present: Absent PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION: Mayor Eshleman/Dr. Charles Koehler, City Treasurer SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS: A. Pamela Eshleman to introduce the Miss Fontana Contestants. B. Curtis Aaron, Public Services Director to present Ray Gonzales, Recreation and Community Services with the Award of Excellence from the California Parks and Recreation Society. C. Tony Lewis and Art Benitez of the Fontana Exchange Club to present a plaque to Bea Watson for the "Book of Golden Deeds". Page 1 of 5 CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 16, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under CONSENT CALENDAR will be enacted by one motion in the form Listed below there will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the time Council Votes On them, unless a member of the Council requests a specific item be<removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion. Does anymember of,the public wish to address the CityCouncil "re ardin an item P ff 9 Y on the Consent Calendar before the vote is taken A. Approve the minutes of the Regular CityCouncil Meetingon pp Adjourned9 March 26, 2002 and the Regular City Council Meeting on April 2, 2002. B. Adopt Ordinance No 1373, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Fontana, approving Specific Plan Amendment#02-002, Hunter's Ridge Specific Plan Amendment#12 to reduce the minimum building pad from 4,500 to 3,450 square feet in the R-1 4,500 zone. C. Accept a donation of 48 small stuffed bears with an estimated value of$144 for use in Police Department Programs. D. Accept a donation in the amount of $25.00 on behalf of the Police Department for use in Community Crime Prevention Programs; increase revenues and approve appropriation in • the amount of $25.00 E. Authorize a contract extension with Fontana Unified School District for use of the City fueling stations and authorize the City Manager to enter into and execute the agreement. F. Award bid and authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract with Industrial Air Innovations Division Inland Acoustics, Incorporated in the amount of $53,499.00 and authorize a 10% contingency in the amount of $5,350.00 (2) Authorize the Business Services Manager to issue a purchase order in the amount of $58,849.00 G. Accept as complete and authorize the Public Services Director to execute and file a Notice of Completion for Project RFP/Q-45-01. (2) Approve the final construction amount of $594,613.00 (3) Approve release of the 10% retention upon satisfactory closure of contract with California Skateparks. H Approve a contract extension with Nationwide Environmental Services for street sweeping services and execute the agreement extending the term of the contract for five years and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement. Accept a bid in the amount of$1,030,643.50 and authorize the City Manager to enter into a construction contract with Riverside Construction Company, Inc., for the construction of Foothill Boulevard streetscapes Village of Heritage (north side only) East Avenue to Cherry Avenue and authorize a 10% contingency fund in the amount of $103,064.35. Page 2 of 5 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 16, 2002 J. Accept as complete and authorize the City Engineer to issue a final Notice of Completion for the work performed by DW Powell Construction, Inc., for the construction of the ramp widening, traffic signals, and safety lighting for the intersection of Baseline Avenue at Interstate 15. K. Accept final map for Tract No.'s 15841 and 15841-1 located south of Summit Avenue between Beech Avenue and Lytle Creek Road in Summit Heights Specific Plan, and accept all dedicated public streets and easements; and authorize the City Manager to enter into a subdivision agreement with the subdivider. L. Accept final map for Tract No. 15844 located south of Sierra Lakes Parkway between Beech Avenue and Lytle Creek Road in the Summit Heights Specific Plan, and accept all dedicated public streets and easements; and authorize the City Manager to enter into a subdivision agreement with the subdivider. M. Accept final map for Tract No. 15843 located south of Summit Avenue between Beech Avenue and Lytle Creek Road in Summit Heights Specific Plan, and accept all dedicated public streets and easements; and authorize the City Manager to enter into a subdivision agreement with the subdivider. N. Accept final map for Tract No. 16182 located on the north side of Miller Avenue between Citrus Avenue and Oleander Avenue, and accept all dedicated public streets and easements; and authorize the City Manager to enter into a subdivision agreement with the subdivider. O. Authorize the Redevelopment and Special Projects Department to advertise for bids for the construction of sewer improvements for the South Highland-Walnut-Juniper Sewer Project as part of the Robert W. Weddle Capital Improvement Program. P. Adopt a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact and State of California Department of Fish and Game DeMinimis Impact Finding, pursuant to the Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act(2001), and direct staff to file a Notice of Determination for the South Highland-Walnut-Juniper Sewer Project. Q. Approve an annual service agreement with Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board in the amount of$29,744 per year for a period of three years, extendable for two additional years, and authorize the City Manager to execute said agreement. R. Adopt Resolution No. 2002- , a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Fontana authorizing a request for reimbursement of $21,750 from the San Bernardino Associated Governments County Transportation Commission to cover the cost of the installation of handicap ramps in various areas of the City of Fontana. S. Adopt Resolution No. 2002- , accepting the proposed distribution of ad valorem taxes as requested by the San Bernardino County Auditor-Controller's Office for the area within Fontana's sphere of influence known as Annexation #152/LAFCO 2887, located on the north side of Washington Drive, easterly of Hemlock Avenue (APN 0235-181-08). Page 3 of 5 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 16, 2002 T. Approve a reduction of bond amounts of Tract Map No. 15908, Sierra Lakes Development— Phase I as follows: Bond No. 814128S in the amount of $1,663,500.00 to $332,700.00; Bond No. 814129S in the amount of $1,400,000.00 to $280,000.00; Bond No. 814130S in the amount of $324,000.00 to $64,000.00; and Bond No. 814131S in the amount of $515,000.00 to $103,000.00 U. Accept final map for Tract No. 16166 and Tract No. 16166-1 located east of Bridlepath Drive and west of Cherry Avenue in the Hunter's Ridge Specific Plan, and accept as public all dedicated streets and easements; and authorize the City Manager to enter into a subdivision agreement with the subdivider. Approve Consent Calendar Items "A-U" as recommended by staff. PUBLIC HEARINGS: To speak on Public Hearing Items, fill out a card at the microphone stand indicating favor or ,opposition and give it to the City Clerk. Each person will be allowed 5 minutes to address 'the Council. 'If you challenge in court any action taken concerning a Public Hearing item, you may be 'limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing 'described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the Public Hearing . . ,„ , , . . All Public Hearings will be conducted following this format: (a) hearing opened (e) oral - favor (b) written communication (f) oral - opposition (c) council/staff comments (g) hearing closed (d) applicant comments (applicant not limited to 5 minutes) A. Inland Empire Utilities Agency Sewerage Facilities Expansion Fee. Adopt Resolution No. 2002- , a Resolution of the City of Fontana approving an increase to the City's connection fee for sewage collection and treatment services in accordance with yearly increases imposed by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency for Fiscal Year 2002/2003 B. Fiscal Year 2002-2003 One Year Action Plan. Approve the Fiscal Year 2002-2003 one year action plan, detailing the utilization of Community Development Block Grant and Home Program Funds, and authorize the City Manager to execute any documents necessary to effectuate said approval. C. General Plan Amendment#02-002, Specific Plan Amendment#02-004 (West End Specific Plan Amendment #15). Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact and State of California Department of Fish and Game DeMinimis Impact Findings for Specific Plan Amendment #02-004 (West End Specific Plan Amendment#15) and General Plan Amendment#02-002. (2) Waive further reading of and introduce Ordinance No. , an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Fontana, approving Specific Plan Amendment #02-004 (West End Specific Plan Amendment #15), an amendment to Areas 11 (6AC), 12 (3AC), and 13D (11.06AC) to change the current P/QP (Public/Quasi—Public) Zone within the West End Specific Plan to an LM2 (Low-Medium 6.0 Density Residential) Zone except for 1.24 acres for a City entry statement (Area 13E). Page 4 of 5 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 16, 2002 PUBLIC HEARINGS CONTINUED: (3) Adopt Resolution No. 2002- , a Resolution of the City of Fontana for an amendment of the General Plan to Areas 11 (6AC), 12 (3AC), 13D (11.06AC) of the West End Specific Plan to change the property from P-R (Recreational) to R-PC (Residential Planned Community). D. Annexation of Territory to Community Facilities District No. 6-1, located at the northwest corner of Baseline Avenue and San Sevaine Avenue. Adopt Resolution No. 2002- , of the City Council of the City of Fontana calling a special election and submitting to the qualified electors of territory proposed to be annexed to Community Facilities District No. 6-1 of the City of Fontana the question of levying special taxes within the territory proposed to be annexed (Annexation No. 2). (2) Adopt Resolution No. 2002- , of the City Council of the City of Fontana declaring the results of the special election for Community Facilities District No. 6-1 of the City of Fontana on the proposition of the annual levy of special taxes within the territory proposed to be annexed to said Community Facilities District to pay the costs of certain services to be provided by the Community Facilities District, determining that the territory proposed to be annexed is added to and part of said Community Facilities District with full legal effect, and ordering the recording of an amendment to the notice of special tax lien for said Community Facilities District including the territory annexed thereto (Annexation No. 2). E. Community Facilities District 17M (Sierra Corridor South). Adopt Resolution No. 2002- , of the City Council of the City of Fontana of formation of the City of Fontana Community Facilities District No. 17 (Sierra Corridor South), authorizing the levy of a special tax within the District and establishing an appropriations limit for the District. (2) Adopt Resolution No. 2002- , of the City Council of the City of Fontana deeming it necessary to incur bonded indebtedness within the City of Fontana Community Facilities District No. 17 (Sierra Corridor South) (3) Adopt Resolution No.2002- , of the City Council of the City of Fontana calling a special election for the City of Fontana Community Facilities District No.17 (Sierra Corridor South) UNFINISHED BUSINESS: None NEW BUSINESS: None PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS: This is an opportunity for citizens to speak to the City Council for up to 3 minutes on items not on the Agenda, but within the City Council's jurisdiction. The Council is prohibited by law from discussing or taking immediate action on non-agendized items ELECTED OFFICIALS COMMUNICATIONS/REPORTS: A. Adhoc Council Subcommittee regarding the Riverside Avenue Realignment with the City of Rialto. B. Discussion of reconsideration on Zone Change #01-01, townhouse project located at 8421 Oleander Avenue. CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS: A. Report on Tennis Court Usage (Curtis Aaron, Public Services Director) B. Jack Bulik Park Report (Curtis Aaron, Public Services Director) ADJOURNMENT: To an adjourned regular workshop meeting on May 7, 2002 at 5:00 p.m. in the City Hall Executive and then to the regular meeting at 7:00 p.m., in the City Hall Council Chambers, located at 8353 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, CA. Page 5 of 5 kLETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 E. Shelby Street Ontario, CA 91764 (909) 980-1982 Fax (909) 941-0891 To: City of Fontana Date: April 11, 2002 8353 Sierra Avenue Project: South Highland Avenue Juniper Fontana, CA 92335 Avenue Sewer System Improvements SP-46-01 Job Number: 01-064 Attention: Mr. George Harvilla Project Manager VIA: ■ U.S. MAIL ■ UPS ■ AE DELIVERY ■ FEDEX Copies Date No. Description 1 1 Sheet Traffic Control Plan Sheet No. 13 • This is sent: 4 For Your Approval • Per Your Request ■ For Your Information -4 For Your Review and Comment • For Your Use _ ■ For Signature Remarks: Please find attached Sheet # 13 of 14 of the above project plan to replace the copy that was delivered by mistake in the set of plans together with Specifications, Estimates, etc. Thanks, By: Elias Bu , Jr. II, Civil Engineering Designer Copy— File ■ Copy - ■ Copy - ■ Copy - South Highland Sewer Final Specifications Page 1 of 1 I I GS 14 I I I + ? closeyF From: Tom Holliman [SMTP:tomh@assoc-eng.com] To: Harvilla, George Cc: Subject: South Highland Sewer Final Specifications Sent: 4/15/02 1:08 PM Importance: Normal Hi George, Apparently when I tried to send you the file folder with all of the electronic files Word created a .Ink file. Instead of trying that again I've attached the individual documents. If you have any more problems please let me know. Tom Holliman Associated Engineers, Inc. 06CITYSPEC.GC-revised apr 11, 2002;02CITYSPEC.NB;03CITYSPEC.IB;04CITYSPEC.P (revised-apr 11, 2002);05CITYSPEC.CA;01CITYSPEC.CVR (revised-apr 11, 2002);07CITYSPEC.SP;CITY SPEC SECTIONS;CITYSPEC.AP fl06CITYSPEC.GC-revised apr 11, 2002.doc nO2CITYSPEC.NB.doc fl03CITYSPEC.IB.doc E04CITYSPEC.P (revised-apr 11, 2002).doc n05CITYSPEC.CA.doc 1101 CITYSPEC.CVR (revised-apr 11, 2002).doc fl07CITYSPEC.SP.doc nCITY SPEC SECTIONS.doc nCITYSPEC.AP.doc http://mail.pbworldnet.com/exchange/forms/IPM/NOTE/read.asp?comr 4/15/2002 CORRECTED SPECS Page 1 of 2 r54) ! 1 1 45 1 1 I * * 1 ? close VY From: Priscilla Emperado [SMTP:priscillae@assoc-eng.com] To: 'cpursel@fontana.org' Cc: 'tomh@assoc-eng.com'; 'Harvilla@pbworld.com' Subject: CORRECTED SPECS Sent: 4/15/02 4:48 AM Importance: Normal I apologize for the error. Attached is the revised spec showing the corrected Page 15, 2nd bullet to say "Construction along South Highland from July 1 to August 15" Original Message From: Tom Holliman Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 5:23 PM To: Priscilla Emperado Subject: FW: ERROR IN SPECS! Importance: High Priscilla, Please make the change and send it to Carla at the cc email address. Please cc me and.George on your transmittal. Thanks, Tom Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:26 PM To: 'tomh@assoc-eng.com'; 'cpursel@fontana.org' Subject: ERROR IN SPECS! Importance: High Tom, I caught an error in the specs. On Page P-15, the second bullet should say "Construction along South Highland from July 1 to August 15" Please change this sheet and e-mail it to Carla Pursel at the City. She will print it and insert it into the specs. I will be at PB/San Bernardino all day Friday (888-1106). http://mail.pbworldnet.com/exchange/forms/IPM/NOTE/read.asp?comr 4/15/2002 CORRECTED SPECS Page 2 of 2 CARLA > Please insert the sheet from Tom, and then forward the plans/specs to Engineering. My understanding is Ricardo Sandoval has to sign thenm, but you might want to check first with Yousuf or Felipe. Thanks, George 04CITYSPEC.P (revised-apr 11, 2002).doc http://mail.pbworldnet.com/exchange/forms/IPM/NOTE/read.asp?cor... 4/15/2002 Page 1 of 1 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Monday,April 01, 2002 4:23 PM To: 'Tomh@assoc-eng.com' Cc: Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org); Paul Balbach (pbalbach@fontana.org); Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org) Subject: South Highland Sewer Tom, This morning, there was a meeting at the City to coordinate several projects which all impact the corner of South Highland and Sierra. Caltrans will decide sometime this week whether to go ahead with the construction of 1-210 from Sierra to 1-215 or to delay it for several years. If they go ahead with construction, they will use South Highland as a detour. Caltrans will widen South Highland, possibly by this summer, when we are installing the sewer along South Highland. We will want the sewer construction to be out of the way of South Highland as soon as possible. Plus, we still want to construct near the High School as soon as possible. So please be prepared to modify the specifications. We would require the bidders to submit a cost for Schedule A (traditional schedule), which would consist of: • Construction along Walnut street from July 1 to August 1 • Construction along Juniper and South High from Aug 1 (or earlier) to Sep. 15. Schedule B would be used if we have to speed up construction along South Highland: • Construction along Walnut street from July 1 to August 1 • Construction along South Highland from July 1 to August 15. • Construction along Juniper from Aug 1 (or earlier) to Sep. 15. The 100% plans are still in City Plan Check. We are doing everything we can to expedite it. After we get the plans back to you, we will need you to address any comments and submit them back to us so we can print approximately 45 copies for bidders. Our window to print is from Apr. 17 to Apr. 24. 11 I've attached the schedule, FYI. 4 George T°'"' P� 4/2/2002 RE: South Highland Sewer Page 1 of 1 P4 ' C I # ? t;'', Close' From: Harvilla, George To: 'Rebecca Harrington ' Cc: 'cpursel@fontana.org' Subject: RE: South Highland Sewer Sent: 4/10/02 2:18 PM Importance: Normal Four copies please. Address them to Carla Purse! at City Hall. Perhaps the reason we did not receive any comments was because the document was so thorough????I!!! Original Message From: Rebecca Harrington To: Harvilla, George Sent: 4/10/02 1:24 PM Subject:.Re: South Highland Sewer Hi George, Sorry I did not get back to you earlier. I have been out sick. No we have never prepared he Neg Dec Cover Sheet/other necessary documentation. So I think it is probably better if the City did it. We will send you the final ND for adoption by council. How many copies would you like? Thanks, Rebecca >>> "Harvilla, George" <Harvilla@pbworld.com> 04/10/02 09:59AM >>> Hi Rebecca, Well, the Public Review Period is over and we have not received any comments. The City Council is scheduled to approve the document next Tuesday. Have you prepared the Neg Dec Cover Sheet/other necessary documentation? If so, can you forward to Carla and me? If not, we can do it. George http://mail.pbworldnet.com/exchange/forms/IPM/NOTE/read.asp?comr 4/10/2002 Summit Avenue Summit Avenue will run in an east-west direction for approximately 21/2 miles from Beech Avenue to Mango Avenue. It will have four lanes, plus turning lanes. A large storm drain will be constructed beneath Summit Avenue and to the west under 1-15 to handle storm runoff from the north part of the city. The goals of this project are: • Provide roadway capacity to serve development of vacant lands in the project area as anticipated by the general plan • Implement the city's circulation master plan South Highland Sewer The proposed sewer will run beneath Walnut Street, Juniper Avenue, and South Highland Avenue. It involves approximately 5,100 feet of new sewer. The goals of this project are: • To provide adequate sewer line capacity and service to an area near the new 1-210 freeway, enabling adjacent land to be developed for commercial uses • To provide an adequate sewer system for the health and welfare of the citizens of the city projectgoals.doc Apr 05 02 02: 39p Caltrop (909) 355-7106 p. 1 s CALTROP ENGINEERING CORPORATION 8285 Sierra Ave.,Suite#110,Fontana,CA 92335 Tel.: (909)434-7001,Fax (909)355-7106 t To: Cjr e 7 14a. Z. l r From: l '°►t (a k p ' I l Fax: Pages: Phone: 4.?7 - 3 1 6 C Date: 7 -- 9 Re: CC: ❑ Urgent D For Review 0 Please Comment ❑Please Reply DPlease Recycle ® Comments: 6e 0-1_ _ .e4...1_s._ .41 c_t. ... _ ..- =r - =� c, 0.- .-: 1 : iM 1 ` .r t"RF i . {{99 � .A fer) ALD.0 Lao -e It'e I* tletAst-e• el,13t, C"‘f 4,"rt 1.° ___...._..._..........- ._. .��§.ji�.iL..._ ..............__........__...-.__...._._.._......_._.._..___-.......____..-..-...._......._.....-...-\.._f%..,.........................._..__.r-._- Rpr• 05 02 02: 39p Caltrop f909) 355-7106 p. 2 "` . NL:'koVI►l k Iv7o) or me total amount bid. Any proposal not accompanied by such a ....' guarantee will not be considered. A payment bond and a performance bond, amount equal to 100 % of the total contract amount, shall be required concu reach ent in an the execution of the contract and shall be in the form set forth in the contract documents. y with Any contract entered into pursuant to this notice will incorporate the the State Labor Code. Labor Code Section 1735 requires that no discrimination beof made in the employment of persons upon public works because ofere s creed, color, national origin, ancestry, the race, religious status, or sex of such persons, except as provided in Government Code P, medical condition, marital Compliance with the prevailing rates of wages and apprenticeship RQSection 12940. employment standards established by the State Director of Industrial Relations will be Affirmative action to ensure against discrimination in employmentP employment practices on the required. of race, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, or religion will also be required. f The CiTY herebyaffirmativelyhi afforded full opportunity ensures that minority business enterprises will be 1a to submit bids in response to .this notice and will not be l discriminated against on the basis of race, color, national origin, ancest � in any consideration leading to the award of contract. Ji �'. sex, or religion !I The contract documents call for monthly • engineers estimate of the percentage of work completed.progress The CiTY willayments retain 10p the i of each progress payment as security for completion of the balance of the Cequest and expense of the successful bidder, the CiTY will pay the amountspercent upon compliance with the requirements of Public Contract work. At the provisions of the contract documents pertaining to Substitution so retained Code Section 22300 and the ton of Securities. Bids must be prepared on the City provided proposal forms and completely E out in conformance with the Instructions to Bidders and all proposal forms y submitted in a sealed envelope plainly marked on the outsideP l filled CONSTRUCTION OF BASELINE AVENUE STORM p "SEALED Bil? FOR BASELINE AVENUE SEWER MAiN FROM ALMERIARAIN, PHASE II, STAGE 1 ust be ALMERIA AVENUE - DO NOT OPEN WITH REG AVENUE TO 750' EAST OF / ULAQMAiL" The .. ........_. .-. __ . .. .. . CITY reserves the right to reject any or all bids, to waive anyirregularity, to _____ ......„........„ accept any bid or portion thereof, and to take all bids under advisement gperioy, f ninety five (95)days. nt for a period of { ,. ,,.. At the time of contract award, the prime contractor shall possess a Class "A" ii contractor's license and/or any combination of Class "C" specialty contractors license(s) 'il. sufficient to perform the work. BY ORDER OF City of Fontana. C !, Dated this 18th day of December, 2001 City of Fontana 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, CA 92335 y (909) 350-7610 NB-2 • Flpr" 05 02 02: 40p Caltrop [909) 355-'7106 p. 3 u) PROPOSAL BID SHEET FOR CONSTRUCTION OF Baseline Avenue Storm Drain Phase II Stage I From San Sevaine Avenue to 750' East of Almeria Avenue Baseline Avenue Sewer Main from Almeria Avenue to 750' East of Almeria Avenue (With Almeria Avenue Alternate Detour) Bid No. SB 2202 Item Description f1 P Estimated Unit Unit Price Total i No. [ Quantity 1 . Clearing & Grubbing Lump Sum LS $ $ 2. DBL 10'x 8'RCB 5170 LF $ $ Per Details Sheets 3 and 4 3. Transition Structure APWA Std Plan 344-1 20 EA $ $ 4. Junction Structure-APWA Std Plan 333-1 4 LF $ $ 5. Junction Structure-APWA Std Plan 334-1 case 2 18 EA $ $ 6. Manhole APWA Std Plan 323-1, 630-2, 635-2 20 EA . $ $ 7. Windows-Detail 2 Sht 3 16 EA $ $ 8. 36"RCP- 1350-D 49 LF $ $ 9. 24"RCP- 1350-D 317 LF $ $ 10. Concrete Collar APNA Std Plan 380-3 3 EA $ $ 11. 18"CMP 12 gage 112 LF $ $ 12. 48"CMP Riser Assembly 8 EA $ $ Per Detail 2 Sheet 2 13. Brick and Mortar Plug 19 EA $ $ Per Detail 5 Sheet 2 14. 6 mil Polyethylene Vapor Barrier 175,780 SF $ $ 15. Concrete Bulkhead 2 EA $ $ Per Detail 3 Sheet 4 16. 4"AC Pavement over Compacted Native 1090 TONS $ $ 17. DBL 12'x 8'RCB 1150 LF $ $ Per Details Sheets 3 and 4 P-19 Ape 05 02 02: 40p Caltrop (909) 355-7106 p. 4 WM r roar VeyM<_ L]ILI ..arict I FOR CONSTRUCTION OF 4 Baseline Avenue Storm Drain Phase II Stage From San Sevaine Avenue to 750' East of Almeria Avenue 1 Baseline Avenue Sewer Main from Almeria Avenue to 750' East of Almeria Avenue (With Almeria Avenue Temporary Detour) Bid No. SB 2202 Item No Description P Estimated Unit Unit Price Quanti Total 1 • Clearing & Grubbing Lump Sum LS $ $ 2. DBL 10'x 8'RCB 5170 LF $Per Details Sheet 3 and 4 $ 3. Transition Structure APWA Std Plan 344-1 20 LF $ 4. Junction Structure-APWA SW Plan 333-1 4 EA $ 5. Junction Structure-APWA Std Plan 334-1 case 2 18 EA $ 6. Manhole APWA Std Plan 323-1, 630-2, 635-2 20 EA $ 7. Windows—Detail 2 Sht 3 16 8. 36"RCP—1350-D 49 LF $ $ 9. 24"RCP—1350-D 317 LF $ 10. Concrete Collar APNA 1 Std Plan"380-3 3 EA $ 11. 18"CMP 12 gage 112 LF '$ 12. 48"CMP Riser Assembly 8 EA $ Per Detail 2 sheet 2 $ 13. Brick and Mortar Plug 19 EA $ Per Detail 5 sheet 2 - $ 14. 6 mil Polyethylene Vapor Barrier 175,780 SF $ 15. Concrete Bulkhead 2 EA $ Per Detail 3 sheet 4 ---- 16. 4"AC Pavement over Compacted Native 1090 TONS $ $ 17. DBL 12'x 8'RCB 1150 LF $ Per Details sheets 3 and 4 $ P-13 Page 1 of 2 Article Last Updated: Thursday,April 04,2002-12:00:00 AM MST e Top , ry Jobs. 1-210 back on track PRODUCTION Freeway extension approved; deal made for 1-215 project Detail By David NI. Drucker Staff Writer PURCHASING RTA Funds to finish the extension of Interstate 210 from Fontana to San Bernardino were secured Thursday, and details of an agreement to find money for work on Interstate 215 MAINTENANCE in San Bernardino were ironed out. Western Rental The California Transportation Commission voted 6-1 in Sacramento to fund construction of the final eight-mile stretch of 1-210. CONTRACTER Detail The deal to keep the widening of 1-215 on track is not as cut and dried. RESEARCH The commission staff had recommended a three-year delay that would have pushed Riverside Community back completion of the 1-215 project to 2012. College San Bernardino Associated Governments, the county's transportation authority, worked HEALTHCARE out a deal that gives it a direct role in securing state funds for the 1-215 project so it can Citrus Nursing Center begin on schedule in 2004. SECURITY "Sanbag will have a part in the process the(CTC) is going to use to decide,when more GUARDS money becomes available, how it's to be doled out," said Cheryl Donahue, a Detail spokeswoman for the county agency. Assemblyman John Longville, D-Rialto, said his goal is to secure the necessary $125,million for 1-215 by the end of this year. ARTICLE OPTIONS "I don't say that casually, or without a strong belief that we will be able to deliver," said • Print this Article Longville, chairman of the Inland Empire Assembly Caucus. "We have plenty of time to • E-Mail Article get this money, and I am comfortable that we will get the necessary funding." • Link this Article ARTICLES • Longville said the governor's office has"given a very clear commitment"that funds will OTTH S SECTION IN be available when needed. 4/5/2002 "Members of the Inland Empire Caucus cover the entire ideological spectrum,on Bush Pressures Israel substantive issues," Longville said. "But,when it comes to parochial issues, we fight for • San Bernardino and Riverside counties." Latinos protest at INS • The commission's decision caps a week of intense lobbying by area officials who testified New bugs creep into before the panel Wednesday, calling both freeway projects critical to San Bernardino Southland County's economic recovery. Fontana Mayor David Eshleman said he is elated by the commission's action not to delay State lashes at firm the 1-210 extension. Bond plan for schools "This decision shows that the governor and the commission are finally realizing that the passes Inland Empire is the conduit for the rest of the nation to receive goods from the Long Beach and Los Angeles ports," Eshleman said. Judge orders ex- teacher to stand trial Other officials said the fact there is no Inland Empire representative on the state 108 more molest commission made it necessary to fight hard to keep the projects on track. charges are filed http://www.sbsun.com/eda/article/cdaNMOArticleDetail/0,1046,1295%7E508001%7E81%7... 4/5/2002 Page2of2 "It's always beneficial to have someone sitting at the table when these things are being discussed," said Longville, who first represented Rialto on the county transportation against teacher board in 1978. 2 schools get good read There currently are two vacancies on the commission, whose members are appointed by from governor the governor. Longville said he has spoken with Gov. Gray Davis about the prospect of appointing someone from the Inland Empire 1 dead,1 wounded in shooting "I know there are discussions going on in the governor's office, which I believe will produce results we'll be happy with," Longville said. coroner's report says suspect killed self Sacramento correspondent Chris Rizo contributed to this report. Leaping to victory David M. Drucker can be reached by phone at(909)483-8553. Chino man faces poaching charge in deer killing Truck flips,snarling commuters Empire Center lawsuit denied Crime and Public Safety Vets hospital tackles sludge in storm drain Cesar Chavez's successor speaks at prayer breakfast Mighty Minister preaches clean living to youth http://www.sbsun.com/cda/article/cdaNMOArticleDetail/0,1046,1295%7E508001%7E81%7... 4/5/2002 Final Specificiations Page 1 of 1 I (► I I ? I 'b I $ Close 1 From: Tom Holliman[SMTP:tomh@assoc-eng.com] To: 'Harvilla,George' Cc: Subject: Final Specificiations Sent: 4/4/02 5:58 PM Importance: Normal George, I have attached the revised final specifications. If you have any questions please let me know. As a side note,did you have a chance to review our proposal for construction management and inspection contained in Amendment No. 1? Thanks, Tom H. • f01 CITI'SPEC:CVR.doc DO2C.ITYSPEC.NB_doc,f 03Cl YSPEC.IB.doc fl04CITYSPEC.P (revised-apr 3 -2002).doc f04CITYSPECP:doc 105CITYSPEC.CA.docf06CITYSPEC.GC.doc E107CITYSPEC.SP.doc. CITY SPEC.SECTIONS.doc fCITYSPEC.AP.doc fCITYSPEC.MRG.doc,fAPPENDIX III -sewer manhole and connections.doc http://mail.pbworldnet.com/exchange/forms/IPM/NOTE/read.asp?command=open&obj=000... 4/5/2002 'FW South Highland Sewer Plan Check Page 1 of 2 4S1 1 11 ? close From: Ray Bragg [SMTP:rbragg@fontana.org] To: Harvilla, George Cc: Subject: FW: South Highland Sewer Plan Check Sent: 3/29/02 6:57 PM Importance: Normal success, perhaps. Ray Original Message From: Ricardo Sandoval Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 3:44 PM To: Greg Bucknell Cc: Ray Bragg Subject: FW. South Highland Sewer Plan Check Please respond with review status asap. Have Jim handle if necessary. Todd is spread to thin. thx Original Message From: Ray Bragg Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 3:33 PM To: Ricardo Sandoval Subject: FW. South Highland Sewer Plan Check Ricardo: Help! These 100% sewer plans have already been plan checked by Todd's outside plan check consultant. They are back with Todd 'for review' before forwarding to our project manager, George Harvilla. The plans have now been with Todd for at least a week now. It seems that if the plan checker has checked them, the 'review' process at Todd's level should be perfunctory at best. Why have a qualified plan checker check them and then have your in-house staff check them again? It negates to purpose of the whole process which is to speed up plan checking and get projects into construction --regardless of whether they are city or private jobs. Ray f Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla(cr��pbworld.com] Sent: Friday, March 29,2002 11:04 AM To: 'rbragg@fontana.org ' Cc: 'cpursel@fontana.org '; Bretz, Timothy Subject: South Highland Sewer Plan Check 1 VFW South Highland Sewer Plan Check Page 2 of 2 Ray, I just spoke to Todd Miller and he said he would not get to the South Highland Sewer Plans today. Last week he promised to look at them on Friday, March 22, but was not able to do so. He said Greg has given him all • kinds of things to do and he also has to answer numerous front counter questions. The plans were submitted to Todd on Feb. 27. At this point, I am not sure when we're going to get them back. The design engineer will need about a week to make corrections and Ricardo Sandoval still has to sign them. We are scheduled to begin printing 45 sets for the bidders on Apr. 17. The bid period begins Apr. 25. I am escalating this up to your level since all I can do is continue to ask Todd about the plans, and I always receive the same response. George Coordination Meeting Agenda April 1, 2002 List of Attendees: Paul Balbach, George Harvilla, Jim Robinson, Felipe Molinos, Clyde Sweet, Dave Eames, Focus location - Sierra Avenue/ South Highland Avenue Projects - South Highland/Juniper/Walnut Sewer South Highland Widening (Citrus to Sierra) Sierra Widening (South Highland to Walnut) Discussion Items - Sequencing of construction projects— • What is the status of Right of Way Acquisition? Which project will go first? Do we need to overlap construction projects? Does the city want to construct Sierra (Walnut north)before fed-funded Sierra(Walnut south)? Traffic control at Sierra/ South Highland during Freeway opening— What coordination with Caltrans is required? PROJECT COORDINATION Page 1 of 1 1II1 18 I clo e From: Ricardo Sandoval [SMTP:rsandoval@fontana.org] Felipe Molinos; Alex Larson; Clyde Sweet; David Eames; Paul Balbach; Harvilla, George; 'JIM To: ROBINSON' Cc: Subject: PROJECT COORDINATION Sent: 3/26/02 12:17 PM Importance: Normal When: 04/03/2002 10:00 AM-11:30 AM (GMT-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada); Tijuana. Where: ENG CONF ROOM FW Coordination of projects Page 1 of 1 °i ( 'rIi I t Closem From: Paul Balbach [SMTP:pbalbach@fontana.org] To: 'harvilla@pbworld.com' Cc: Subject: FW: Coordination of projects Sent: 3/20/02 5:40 PM Importance: Normal Original Message From: Ricardo Sandoval Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 9:32 AM To: Katie Ecoff Cc: Felipe Molinos; Alex Larson; Clyde Sweet; David Eames; Paul Balbach Subject: Re: Coordination of projects Katie, Please arrange coordination meeting. David Eames wrote on 3/19/02 3:09 pm: Ricardo, May I suggest a coordination meeting for three projects that overlap. The Sierra and South Highland intersection will get very busy later this year. It seems wise to coordinate the sewer project(George Harvilla) with the South Highland Widening (Alex Larsen) and the Sierra widening project(Jim Robinson). We also have the freeway opening at the end of the year(Clyde Sweet). It would be helpful to (1) coordinate the construction of the sewer and the South Highland widening. (2) Look at traffic handling through the intersection during the various construction projects. (3) Make a decision as to if the city manager wants to build Sierra Ave. out to the ultimate from South Highland down to the Walnut Street intersection. Carla Pu seI From: Harvilla, George[Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 3:47 PM To: 'rbragg @fontana.org '; 'pbalbach@fOntana.org '; 'cpursel@fontana.org '; 'ypatanwala@fontana.org ' Cc: Buchanan,Jack; lomh@assoc-eng.com ' J �/ Subject: South Highland Sewer Schedule �N1 S 4,t_e/01.41,Arrixk V I sewer_schedule_rev_l _ / `J •_ .xls /��I�f�vL� Ray/Paul/Yousuf, I have modified the South Highland Sewer Schedule (attache ) based on input received from Yousuf. The main objective of this schedule is to have construction complete by the time classes resume at A.B. Miller High School in the fall. Classes resume on Sept. 4. We will require the contractor to complete the construction on Walnut Street, including final asphalt, by Aug 1. He will then have until Sept. 15 to complete the work on Juniper and South Highland. By the time classes resume, he could be 100% complete, or in the worst case, will be finishing up near the corner of Sierra and South Highland. Please let me know if this approach is acceptable. If you agree with this schedule, it will then become the baseline schedule. George IeitAl p 11 611A 71-'‘,f)/ y 1-2P-de--1/ i0P-14/76( ii.i417h- 1 la / 4 f,--7 44( 711-11-S 710 e/A5/144/ „.Jpi-A) • South Highland Sewer Updated March 19,2002 Activity Description Early Start Early Finish 2001 2002 2003 NDJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASOND Design Design Work Start Jul 2,01 90%Design Jul 3,01 Dec 21,01 City Design Review Dec 24,01 Jan 21,02 100%Design Jan 22,02 Feb 26,02 City Design Review Feb 27,02 Mar 22,02 Final Design Mar 23,02 Mar 31,02 Dwg Subm/Design Phase Complete Mar 31,02 • Environmental Draft Initial Study/Neg Dec Start Jan 21,02 Draft Initial Study/Neg Dec Jan 21,02 Feb 15,02 City Review Feb 16,02 Mar 6,02 Address City Comments Mar 7,02 Mar 15,02 Contact Newspaper Re:Council Public Hearing of Neg Dec Mar 18,02 Publish Date for Notice Re:Council Hearing of Neg Dec Mar 21,02 20 Day Public Review Period Mar 21,02 Apr 9,02 Submit Staff Report to City Clerk for Council Action Apr.16 Apr 1,02 Respond to Public Comments Apr 10,02 Apr 15,02 City Council Public Hearing/Approval of Neg.Dec. Apr 16,02 Environmental Process Complete Apr 16,02 Constructor Selection Construction Bid Process Start Apr 16,02 Council Authorizes Bidding Process Apr 16,02 Advertise for Bids(2 Newspapers) Apr 25,02 Four Week Bidding Period Apr 25,02 May 23,02 Submit Staff Report to City Clerk for Council Action Jun.4 May 20,02 Open Bids May 23,02 Council Awards Bid Jun 4,02 Contractor Finalizes Contract/Bonding/Insurance Jun 4,02 Jun 14,02 Preconstruction Meeting Jun 11,02 City Review of Contract/Bonding/Insurance Jun 14,02 Jun 18,02 Contract Executed Jun 18,02 Notice To Proceed(Const to begin within 10 days) Jun 19,02 Construction Bid Process Complete Jun 19,02 Construction Construction Start Jul 1,02 Construction Along Walnut Street(24 Working Days) Jul 1,02 Aug 1,02 Construction Along Juniper and So.Highland(31 Wrkg Days) Aug 1,02 Sep 15,02 Construction Complete Sep 15,02 Close Out Project Closeout Start Sep 16,02 Update City Records Sep 16,02 Dec 16,02 Warranty Period Sep 16,02 Sep 15,03 Valuation of CIP Improvement Dec 16,02 Project Complete Sep 15,03 sewer schedule_rev_1.xis • Transmission Report Date/Time 3-20-02; 2:48PM Local ID 909 350 7676 Local Name City of Fontana Company Logo city of Fontana This document was con -F i rmed . ( reduced sample and details below) Document Size Letter -8 124* • 0: • Special Projects CITY OF FONTANA MANNONNEMNOMMENE V .a a'sa(�.�'�fP.,G?'d�"'rc3%E:,:.: • • TRANSMISSION To:ge%er onrrc�i e % .(of--. From: George Harvilla ATTN: • cc: FAX: (7/Y) 973-z/Vi _ Date: March 20,2002 Phone: ( ) Pages: (including ibis page) Subject /�'v olor F.o., /8.y p,4g1 0 Urgent ❑For Review ❑Please Comment D Mean Reply ❑Please Recycle Message: iik:.Ul,dfucox, Total Pages Scanned 3' Total Pages Confirmed 3' No. Doc Remote Station Start Time Duration Pages Mode Comments Results 1 570 917149734918 3-20-02; 2:45PM 3' 13" 3/ 3 EC CP 14400 ** Notes **• SC: Error Correct RE: Resend PD: Polled by Remote MB: Receive to Mailbox SC: Broadcast Send MP: Multi—Poll PG: Polling a Remote PI : Polder Interruption CP: Completed RM: Receive to Memory DR: Document Removed TM: Terminated by user LS: Local Scan LP: Local Print FO: Forced Output WT: Waiting Transfer Transmission Report Date/Time 3-22-02; 11 :27AM Local ID 909 350 7676 Local Name City of Fontana Company Logo city of Fontana This document was con -Firmed . ( reduced sample and detai Is below) Document Size Letter -S Special Projects CITY OF FONTANA •a• ftSt . 0 TRANSMISSION To:/Sao/;o.r 4,opepr44 44 r e{'s From: George Harvilla ATTN: rc: • FAX: (7/9) 977-y9/F Date: March 20,2002 Phone:j ) Pages: .7 F V (Including this page) Subject X'"or or -aq' 0 Urgent 0 For Review 0 Please Comment ❑Please Reply ❑Please Recycle Message: f V2. • • • • Total Pages Scanned 3' Total Pages Confirmed 3' No. Doc Remote Station Start Time Duration Pages Mode Comments Results 1 957 917149734918 3-22-02; 11 :24AM 3' 15" 3/ 3 EC CP 14400 -** Notes ** EC: Error Correct RE: Resend PD: Polled by Remote MB: Receive to Mailbox BC: Broadcast Send MP: Multi-Poll PG: Polling a Remote PI : Polder Interruption CP: Completed RM: Receive to Memory DR: Document Removed TM: Terminated by user LS: Local Scan LP: Local Print FO: Forced Output WT: Waiting Transfer VS T� 0741111 /nm "'��"''' Special Projects CITY OF FONTANA 8353 Sierra Avenue o Fontana a California)] (909) 350-6519, Fax (909) 350-7676 ra)ct, tiss � (l `rGf TRANSMISSION To: 4 ? ' 8 �- From: George Harvilla �Po%vs ,q�o,,,pviG %r. ✓ C Z g ATTN: cc: FAX: (7/Y ) 9 7 7~ yql o Date: March 20, 2002 Phone: ( ) Pages: .3 (including this page) Subject /'i dos s �,„ �c a� ,tea q y dJ ❑ Urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment 0 Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle Message: f File:Misc\fax-cover 6- 6-01 ; 5:47PM; ; 1234567 7# 1/ CITY OF FONTANA FAX COMMUNICATIONS FAX NUMBER: (909) 350-6618 PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING PAGES TO: NAME: .T; N 2Lve;gh.,6, LOCATION:/ • FAX: 2/3 - 3CZ " 9Lilo PHONE: FROM: G�� ��c /�G r •�� LOCATION/ 9e1....7 s-o- 6s i 9 PHONE: TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES: 7 DATE: .'2 9 v 2- TIME: (INCLUDING COVER SHEET) MESSAGE: Kt, � /\ G" �/ A t !jl %2, 11A .- O'l • /c -de✓e �o �i�n.71"/;J c / �o je. c7L/ at f'Li e Yv /ce, s) c- vrJl<<•*dti/ /-(> 72), 744;r CITY OF FONTANA ENGINEERING DIVISION CC: 8353 SIERRA AVENUE,FONTANA,CA 92335 PHONE NUMBER:(909)350-7610 . i . iii,11,1 ;4 .� Transmission Report Date/Time 3-29-02; 12:33PM • Local ID 909 350 7676 Local Name City of Fontana Company Logo city of Fontana This document was confirmed . ( reduced sample and details below) Document Size Letter -S CITY OF FONTANA FAX.COMMUNICATIONS FAX N UMBER:(909)350-6618 PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING PAGES TO: NAME:I j;•,,.. 2,,, , 4.rf LOCATION:I I FA%: 2/7-7 6 z"9 yfo I PRONE: I FROM: (7rn, ,/ r// J LOCAT1ON1 goy-i -63 isi1 PHONE: TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES:I 7I DATE:J a9-o2- TIME:I, ' - (INCLIWSGCGVEE SHEET) MESSAGE; vA f !,.w /%r.<•, o f ' c ea • CM OF FONTANA ENGINEERING DIVISION CC: 83S381EUBA AVENUE,FONTANA,CA 92335 PHONE NUMBER:(909)350.7110 �tiA BLS f. Total Pages Scanned 3' Total Pages Confirmed 3' No. Doc Remote Station Start Time Duration Pages Mode Comments Results 1 128 912133629480 3-29-02; 12:3OPM 2'34" 3/ 3 EC CP 9600 ** Notes ** EC: Error Correct RE: Resend PD: Polled by Remote MB: Receive to Mailbox SC: Broadcast Send MP: Multi-Poll PG: Polling a Remote PI : Power Interruption CP: Completed RM: Receive to Memory DR: Document Removed TM: Terminated by user LS: Local Scan LP: Local Print FO: Forced Output WT: Waiting Transfer South Highland Sewer Schedule Page 1 of 1 From: Harvilla, George To: 'rbragg@fontana.org '; 'pbalbach@fontana.org '; 'cpursel@fontana.org '; 'ypatanwala@fontana.org ' Cc: Buchanan, Jack; 'tomh@assoc-eng.com' Subject: South Highland Sewer Schedule Sent: 3/19/02 6:46 PM Importance: Normal Ray/Paul/Yousuf, I have modified the South Highland Sewer Schedule (attached) based on input received from Yousuf. The main objective of this schedule is to have construction complete by the time classes resume at A.B. Miller High School in the fall. Classes resume on Sept. 4. We will require the contractor to complete the construction on Walnut Street, including final asphalt, by Aug 1. He will then have until Sept. 15 to complete the work on Juniper and South Highland. By the time classes resume, he could be 100% complete, or in the worst case, will be finishing up near the corner of Sierra and South Highland. Please let me know if this approach is acceptable. If you agree with this schedule, it will then become the baseline schedule. George sewer schedule rev 1.xls FUSD Schedule Page 1 of 1 II $ I ? Close'': From: Carla Pursel [SMTP:cpursel@fontana.org] To: Harvilla, George Cc: Subject: FUSD Schedule Sent: 3/19/02 11:22 AM Importance: Normal Good Morning- I spoke w/the personnel at AB Miller HS this morning and here's the scoop. They will have summer school from 06/24 thru 08/02. The new school year starts 09/04/02. Anything else?? cp CarCa S. Purse( .Administrative Project Coordinator CITY OF yoi rr it Redevelopment & SpeciaCProjects 909.350.6792 IJClear Day Bkgrd.JPG WCl 0 DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES INC. TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 15,2002 PAGES: 1 TO: Carla Pursel TELEPHONE NO: City of Fontana FAX NO: 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana,CA 92335 FROM: Rebecca Harrington TELEPHONE NO: (619)260-3420 FAX NO: (619)260-3428 PROJECT: South Highland and Juniper Sewer Improvement Negative Declaration PROJECT NO: FONT0000-0008 cc:George Harvilla,City of Fontana Karen Ruggels, DEA ®AS YOU REQUESTED ❑ FOR YOUR APPROVAL ❑ RETURN REQUESTED ❑ FOR YOUR INFORMATION ❑ RECORDS MANAGEMENT ® FOR YOUR USE ITEM COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 1 5 3-15-02 Five copies of the Draft Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the proposed South Highland Avenue and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvement Project with Notice. 2 1 3-15-02 Notice of Intent to Adopt COMMENTS: Two copies of the draft Initial Study/Negative Declaration are for the City Clerks office.Please consult with George regarding the distribution of the remaining three copies. Per your direction I have also included a copy of the notice of Intent to Adopt.Please feel free to call me at(619)260-3420 or e-mail me at rsha@deainc.com with any questions or concerns. Thanks, Rebecca Harrington 8989 Rio San Diego Drive,Suite 335 San Diego CA 92108 Phone:(619)260-3420 Facsimile:(619)260-3428 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a"Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Agriculture Resources 0 Air Quality ❑ Biological Resources 0 Cultural Resources 0 Geology/Soils ❑ Hazards&Hazardous ❑ Hydrology/Water Quality 0 Land Use/Planning Materials ❑ Noise 0 Population/Housing ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Recreation 0 Transportation/Traffic ❑ Public Services ❑ Mandatory Findings of ❑ Utilities/Service Systems Significance DETERMINATION(To be completed by the Lead Agency): On the basis of this initial evaluation: ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent.A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a"potentially significant or"potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required,but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a)have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b)have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are ' osed upon the proposed project,nothing further is required. / Z Signa e Dat Debbie Brazill,Deputy Community Development Director City of Fontana Printed Name For • FORM"J" Page 2 of 12 III CITY 0 " A X CALIFORNIA COMMUNICAT IONS 0 FROM FAX NO. (909) 350- 7676 N • PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING PAGES TO: IIIA NAME: 4,eCrCcs LOCATION: FAX NUMBER: PHONE: FROM: LOCATION: ACCOUNT NO: PHONE: TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES: 2 DATE: . TIME: (Including cover sheet) MESSAGE: C C: SKY FORM FEB,1994 Traffic Control Plans Page 1 of 1 INIMIV1431X14- * 1 ? From: Elias busuego [SMTP:eliasb@assoc-eng.com] To: 'Rebecca Rot inson' R `°" _ Cc: Harvilla, George; Tom Holliman Subject: Traffic Control Plans Sent: 3/11/02 5:15 PM Importance: Normal Attached are the main drawings: The main Xrefs drawings are: The following are the XRefs Traffic sign drawings: JTrafFic11.dwq afraffic12.dwg IiTraffic13.dwg IiTrafFic14.dwqRW.dwci DcIGRAY.dwq DMedian.dw g SurveyRW.dwq IiConstsigns1.dwg]Constsignsla.dwq[iConstsignslb.dw.. DConstsi ns1C.dwg Constsignsl D.dwg 1Constsigns1 E.dwq:DConstsignsl F.dwq nDetourdwg UStop.dwq LJStopahead.dwg 0 DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES INC. TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 15,2002 PAGES: 1 TO: George Harvilla TELEPHONE NO: (909)350-6519 City of Fontana,Engineering Dept. FAX NO: 3413 Sierra Avenue Fontana, CA 92335 FROM: Rebecca Harrington TELEPHONE NO: (619)260-3420 FAX NO: (619)260-3428 PROJECT: South Highland Avenue and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements PROJECT NO: FONT0000-0008 ❑AS YOU REQUESTED ❑ FOR YOUR APPROVAL ❑ RETURN REQUESTED ❑ FOR YOUR INFORMATION ❑ RECORDS MANAGEMENT ❑ FOR YOUR USE ® FOR YOUR REVIEW ITEM COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 1 1 2/15/02 Figures 1-7c for the Draft South Highland Avenue and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements Negative Declaration COMMENTS: 8989 Rio San Diego Drive,Suite 335 San Diego CA 92108 Phone:(619)260-3420 Facsimile:(619)260-3428 '' r,i RE: Traffic Control Plans Page 1 of 1 vose f f 1 From: Rebecca Harrington [SMTP:Rsha@deainc.com] ' , r,� t To: Harvilla@pbworld.com A ' �. Cc: ' Subject: RE: Traffic Control Plans ,^ �(l Sent: 3/13/02 6:45 PM hK",, Importance: Normal We got the plans and are going to print the Draft Neglec tomorrow. According to your schedule we will be going to public review on March 21, 2002. So we willovernight/the documents and notices out on the 20th to the different-agencies. Can I get the City copiessto you earlier?tDo you know the location of the public hearing on 4/16/02 (for the notices)? Could you e-mair it to me? I will get you the notices by the end of the week for you to post and put up athe County Clerks office. Thanks, Rebecca ` Ur >>> "Harvilla, George" <Harvilla@pbworld.com> 03/13/02 03:31 PM >>> Rebecca, Did you receive these plans? How is the Final document coming along? George Original Message From: Elias busuego To: 'Rebecca Robinson' Cc: Harvilla, George; Tom Holliman Sent: 3/11/02 5:15 PM Subject: Traffic Control Plans Attached are the main drawings: The main Xrefs drawings are: The following are the XRefs Traffic sign drawings: «Traffics l.dwg>> «Traffic12.dwg» «Traffic13.dwg>> «Traffic14.dwg>> «RW.dwg>> <<cIGRAY.dwg>> <<Median.dwg>> «SurveyRW.dwg>> <<Constsignsl.dwg>> <<Constsignsla.dwg>> «Constsignsl b.dwg>> «Constsignsl C.dwg>> «Constsignsl D.dwg>> «Constsignsl E.dwg» «Constsignsl F.dwg>> <<Detour.dwg>> «Stop.dwg>> <<Stopahead.dwg>> � i ESE: Noticing Page 1 of 2 14) 1 g 1 4 I r I I t I ? Close''' From: Debbie Brazill [SMTP:dbrazill@fontana.org] To: 'Harvilla, George' Cc: Subject: RE: Noticing Sent: 3/11/02 5:59 PM Importance: Normal George: The City typically does the newspaper noticing and the direct mailing to property owners for a project. You have to do one of the items listed below per CEQA. ----Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:40 PM To: 'cousley@fontana.org'; 'cpursel@fontana.org' Cc: 'dbrazill@fontana.org' Subject: FW Noticing Cindy/Carla, What is your take on this? George Original Message From: Rebecca Harrington [mailto:Rsha@deainc.com] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:35 PM To: Harvilla@pbworld.com Cc: Karen Ruggels Subject: Noticing Hi George, I checked CEQA on noticing for public review. It is fine not to notice in the paper but if you are going to notice in City Hall you have to also notice on the project site. Section 15072 of CEQA states: / The lead agency shall mail a notice of intent to adopt a ND or Mr to the last known name a addresses of all organizations and individua s who have previously requested such notice in writing an shall also give n tice of intent to adopt by at least one of the following procedures to al ow the public the review period provided under Section 15105: RE: Noticing Page 2 of 2 (A) Publication, no fewer times than required by section 6061 of the Government Code, by the public agency in a newspaper of general circulation in the area affected by the proposed project. If more than one area will be affected, the notice shall be published in the newspaper of largest circulation from among the newspapers of general circulation in those areas. (B) Posting of notice by the lead agency on-and off-site in the area where the project is to be located. (C) Direct mailing to the owners and occupants of contiguous property shown on the latest equalized assessment roll. Please let me know if there is anything you want DEA to do. Thanks, Rebecca RE: Noticing Page 1 of 2 1 1 1 1 4 ? 1Ci98e° From: Carla Pursel [SMTP:cpursel@fontana.org] To: 'Harvilla, George' Cc: Cindy Ousley Subject: RE: Noticing Sent: 3/11/02 6:22 PM Importance: Normal George We don't have to 'notice' the environmental review in the newspaper. What we call"noticing" in the newspaper is the Public Hearing Notice for the City Council in approving the Neg Dec, and that is placed in the newspaper 20 days before the City Council meeting. We have to "post"for environmental review at the front counter(the clip-board I showed you) and at the County Clerk's office for the 20 day period also, but nothing requesting environmental review(comments)gets into the newspaper. Confusing??? cp Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvillanpbworld.com] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:40 PM To: 'cousley@fontana.org'; 'cpursel@fontana.org' Cc: 'dbrazill@fontana.org' Subject: FW: Noticing Cindy/Carla, What is your take on this? George Original Message From: Rebecca Harrington [mailto:Rsha@deainc.com] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:35 PM To: Harvilla@pbworld.com Cc: Karen Ruggels Subject: Noticing Hi George, I checked CEQA on noticing for public review. It is fine not to notice in the paper but if you are going to notice in City Hall you have to also notice on the project site. ,RE: Noticing Page 2 of 2 Section 15072 of CEQA states: The lead agency shall mail a notice of intent to adopt a ND or MND to the last known name a addresses of all organizations and individuals who have previously requested such notice in writing an shall also give notice of intent to adopt by at least one of the following procedures to allow the public the review period provided under Section 15105: (A) Publication, no fewer times than required by section 6061 of the Government Code, by the public agency in a newspaper of general circulation in the area affected by the proposed project. If more than one area will be affected, the notice shall be published in the newspaper of largest • circulation from among the newspapers of general circulation in those areas. (B) Posting of notice by the lead agency on-and off-site in the area where the project is to be located. (C) Direct mailing to the owners and occupants of contiguous property shown on the latest equalized assessment roll. Please let me know if there is anything you want DEA to do. Thanks, Rebecca FIW�Notices� for Southl ;Highland� Avenue Sewer Project Page 1 of .,� ;lose ' From: Harvilla, George To: 'cousley@fontana.org ' Cc: 'dbrazill@fontana.org '; 'rbragg@fontana.org '; 'pbalbach@fontana.org '; 'cpursel@fontana.org ' Subject: FW: Notices for South Highland Avenue Sewer Project Sent: 2/27/02 2:17 PM Importance: Normal LIS Distribution List-S Highland Sewer.doc ElForm D Notice of Intent to Adopt a Neg Dec or Mit Neg Dec.doc nNotice of Availability.doc Cindy, Please review the Notices for the South Highland Sewer project. I am proposing the following changes:. In the Notice of Availability of Draft IS and Mitigated Neg Dec., under Description of Nature, Purpose, and Beneficiaries of Project, change the third sentence to"Traffic access will be maintained along Walnut Street, Juniper Avenue, South Highland Avenue, and Sierra Avenue during construction and the roadways " Also, under Contact Person, change"Engineering Division"to "Special Projects" and change"8413 Sierra Avenue" to"8353 Sierra.Avenue". George Original Message From: Rebecca Harrington To: Harvilla@pbworld.com Cc: Karen Ruggels Sent: 2/27/02 1:35 PM Subject: Notices for South Highland Avenue Sewer Project Hi George, Please review the attached notices for the South Highland Avenue and Juniper Avenue Sewer System Improvement Negative Declaration (ND) and give me any edits you see fit. I have also attached a suggested distribution list for agencies that maybe interested in reviewing the ND. Thanks, Rebecca <<IS Distribution List-S Highland Sewer.doc>> <<Form D Notice of Intent to Adopt a Neg Dec or Mit Neg Dec.doc>> <<Notice of Availability.doc>> http://mail.pbworldnet.com/exchange/forms/I PM/NOTE/read.asp?command=open&o.. 2/27/0 Suggested Distribution List for the South Highland Avenue Sewer Improvement Draft IS/MND City of Fontana G t Fontana Water Company 8353 Sierra Avenue 8440 Nuevo Avenue Fontana, CA 92335 Cp ry°� Fontana, CA 92335 Attn: Planning Division Attn: General Manager Mike McGraw Attn: Engineering Division (909) 350-7602 (909) 822-2201 County of San Bernardino Fontana Library 385 N. Arrowhead 8334 Emerald Avenue ' San Bernardino, CA 92425 Fontana, CA 92335 Attn: Randy Scott/Planning Department Attention;Renee Lavatato County Clerk Second Floor Attention: John Ravgia (909) 822-8330 (909) 387-2020 (909) 822-2321 (909) 884-4056 San Bernardino Association of Fontana Police Department Governments Fontana Police Department 472 N. Arrowhead 17005 Upland Avenue San Bernardino, CA 92401 Fontana, CA 92335 Attn: Ty Schuiling/Planning Department Attn: Administration (909) 884-8276 (909) 350-7740 Southern California Edison Central Valley Fire Department • 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue P.O. Box 1040 Rosemead, CA 91770 Fontana, CA 92334 Attn: Environmental Department Attn: BC Bush (626) 302-1212 (909) 829-4441 City Clerk South Coast Air Quality Management Fontana City Hall -`' { District(SCAQMD) 8353 Sierra Avenue (2. r , 21865 East Copley Drive Fontana, Ca. 92335 s �>°' o, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4182 i Attention: Diane Akuszewskia,es Attn: Planning Director C '! (909) 350-7602 AlAK kyil' (909) 396-2000 Fontana Unified School District 9680 Citrus Avenue Fontana, CA (909) 357-5000 NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice is hereby given that City of Fontana has completed an Initial Study of the South Highland Avenue and Juniper Avenue Sewer System Improvements project in accordance with the City's Guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act. This Initial Study was undertaken for the purpose of deciding whether the project may have a significant effect on the environment. On the basis of such Initial Study, the City's Staff has concluded that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment, and has therefore prepared a Draft Negative Declaration. The Initial Study reflects the independent judgment of the City. The Project site is not on a list compiled pursuant to Government Code section 65962.5. Copies of the Initial Study and Draft Negative Declaration are on file at Fontana City Hall, 8353 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, California 92335 and are available for public review. Comments will be received until . Any person wishing to comment on this matter must submit such comments, in writing, to the City prior to this date. Comments of all Responsible Agencies are also requested. At its meeting on at the City Council will consider the project and the Draft Negative Declaration. If the City Council finds that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment, it may adopt the Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration. This means that the City Council may proceed to consider the project without the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report. e 1<, Date Received try' iR for Filing: George Harvilla p rf Staff / -� (Clerk Stamp Here) l/" Cy Title s NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF DRAFT INITIAL STUDY AND '` t d & k MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ' Project Title South Highland Avenue and Juniper Avenue Sewer System Improvements Project Location- Specific Along Walnut Street from Cypress Avenue to Juniper Avenue; along Juniper Avenue from Walnut Street to South Highland Avenue; along South Highland Avenue from Juniper Avenue to Sierra Avenue; along Sierra Avenue from South Highland Avenue for 105 feet,within the City of Fontana. Project Location- City Project Location- County City of Fontana County of San Bernardino Description of Nature, Purpose, and Beneficiaries of Project: The project involves approximately 5,105 linear feet of sewer improvements along Walnut Street from Cypress Avenue to Juniper Avenue; along Juniper Avenue from Walnut Street to South Highland Avenue; along South Highland Avenue from Juniper Avenue to Sierra Avenue; along Sierra Avenue from South Highland Avenue for approximately 100 feet. The project would include construction of 15 manholes. Traffict-along Walnut Street, Juniper Avenue, South Highland Avenue, and Sierra Avenue would b een during c nstructioon�and the roadways would be restored to their original conditions after construction of the sewer line andmanholes:-- , , ,-S„ .// { The Significant Effects on the Environment, if any, Anticipated as a Result of the Ppject: The City of Fontana Engineering Division conducted an Initial Study,which determined that the proposed project would not have an effect on the environment. The City intends to adopt a Negative Declaration for the project. Lead Agency Division City of Fontana,Engineering Division 1/"- 4,0/, f-/ ' ILL_ /Pe ti�e-�‹ Date when project noticed to public: r� „� 3/7 Address where copy of the IS and all documents referenced in the IS are availab e: Fontana Engineering Division 8413 Sierra Avenue Fontana, California 92335 IS is also available at the following locations: Fontana City Hall 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, California 9233,5 Review Period Contact Person Area Code-Telephone- Extension t t, George Harvilla,Project Manager ? ;' City of Fontana, Engineeri "Di iv siren � � f `_ f�j F �,+� titi PS-7 -8443-Sierra Avenue g " e�`� Fontana, California 92335 ✓r r 09)350-6519 v c/ ` �� n f Or RE: Number of Copies for South Highland Sewer IS/MND Page 1 of 1 Harvilla, George From: Debbie Brazill [dbrazill@fontana.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 5:44 PM To: Harvilla, George Cc: Cindy Ousley Subject: RE: Number of Copies for South Highland Sewer IS/MND George: I talked to Ricardo Sandoval and he said his staff routinely does the mailing out/noticing for environmental docs. If you need info as to what needs to be done, see Cindy Ousley. However, DEA can provide this service as well. Debbie Original Message 'lc" From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] efiv Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 4:50 PM To: 'rsha@deainc.com' Cc: 'dbrazill@fontana.org'; 'cousley@fontana.org' Subject: Number of Copies for South Highland Sewer IS/MND Rebecca, You asked about the number of copies of the IS/MND. On your"Suggested Distribution List"you show 11 Agencies. Please send one to each agency, with the exception of City of Fontana (2 copies, one for me and one for Cindy Ousley), and the City Clerk will need 2 for public review. That's a total of 13. George 3/7/2002 Harv►IIa, George From: Rebecca Harrington [Rsha@deainc.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 5:27 PM To: Harvilla, George Cc: Karen Ruggels; cousley@fontana.org; dbrazill@fontana.org Subject: Re: Number of Copies for South Highland Sewer IS/MND George, Do you want us to send them directly to the agencies with the notices?That is no problem but I just want to make sure. If so, please e-mail me the final notices or direct me on changes to the notices (if any). Thanks, Rebecca "Harvilla, George"<Harvilla@pbworld.com>03/06/02 04:49PM >>> Rebecca, You asked about the number of copies of the IS/MND. On your"Suggested Distribution List"you show 11 Agencies. Please send one to each agency,with the exception of City of Fontana(2 copies, one for me and one for Cindy Ousley), and the City Clerk will need 2 for public review. That's a total of 13. George South Highland Sewer Page 1 of 1C444' IMIgHPIt X '4' 1 ? Closn From: Harvilla, George To: 'ypatanwala@fontana.org' Cc: Subject: South Highland Sewer Sent: 3/5/02 1:38 PM Importance: Normal Yousuf, In order for construction of the South Highland Sewer to be complete before school starts in September, the bidding process must begin in mid-March. The city should be through with its plan check by then. I received a list of Contract Administration Procedures from Carla which shows the various bidding activities. When you get some time (I realize you're busy with moving!) can we get together to discuss all of the bidding steps-and who does what? Thanks, George http://mail.pbworldnet.com/exchange/forms/I PM/NOTE/read.asp?command=open&ob,.. 3/5/02 Number of Copies for South Highland Sewer IS/MND Page 1 of From: Harvilla, George To: 'rsha@deainc.com' Cc: 'dbrazill@fontana.org'; 'cousley@fontana.org' Subject: Number of Copies for South Highland Sewer IS/MND Sent: 3/6/02 7:49 PM Importance: Normal Rebecca, You asked about the number of copies of the IS/MND. On your"Suggested Distribution List"you show 11 Agencies. Please send one to each agency, with the exception of City of Fontana (2 copies, one for me and one for Cindy Ousley), and the City Clerk will need 2 for public review. That's a total of 13. George http://mail.pbworldnet.com/exchange/forms/IPM/NOTE/read.asp?command=open&ob.. 3/6/02 Comments on Draft Initial Study Page 1 of I4) 111 ( ; 114 *- 1 ? Ciosd; From: Harvilla, George To: 'rsha@deainc.com' Cc: Subject: Comments on Draft Initial Study Sent: 3/6/02 5:16 PM Importance: Normal Rebecca, Attached are the City's comments on the South Highland Sewer Initial Study. You will also get a separate e- mail with additional comments. George newer comments.doc http://mail.pbworldnet.com/exchange/forms/I PM/NOTE/read.asp?command=open&ob... 3/6/02 Comments on Draft Initial Study for South Highland Sewer • Inner cover sheet: Change George Harvilla's phone number to (909) 350-6519 • Section2.2, Line B, Last Sentence: Should read"....the project proposes to replace damaged pavement with four inches of asphalt concrete pavement." • Traffic Control Plan for Walnut, Juniper, and South Highland: See separate e- mail with attached file with revisions done by Tom Holliman of Associated Engineers. • Revisions to Exhibits: Tom will be making changes to the exhibits to reflect the revisions to the text regarding traffic control. He will forward these to you. • Environmental Checklist Form: Change George Harvilla's phone number to (909) 350-6519 Sewer comments.doc FW South Highland Sewer Neg. Dec. Page 1 of I4' III Iq2I 4- + ? rClose '. From: Harvilla, George To: 'rsha@deainc.com' Cc: 'tomh@assoc-eng.com' Subject: FW: South Highland Sewer Neg. Dec. Sent: 3/6/02 5:20 PM Importance: Normal traffic control EIR comments with edits 3 6 02.doc Rebecca, Attached are comments from Tom Holliman on the Traffic Control. He will forward any revised drawings to you. George Original Message From: Tom Holliman • To: Harvilla, George Sent: 3/6/02 4:54 PM Subject: RE: South Highland Sewer Neg. Dec. Hi George, ' I have attached an edited version of the EIR text. Based on our idea of how the contractor will implement this job. South Highland Sierra would remain open to two way traffic. Walnut would be open to one way traffic with a flagman. Juniper would be closed in portions to allow for the work but still allow the residents to get in and out of their houses, but not general traffic. We are revising the traffic control plans to reflect our expected construction sequencing and will provide updates drawings in the next few days. If you have any questions let me know. Tom Holliman <<traffic_control EIR comments with edits 3 6 02.doc>> http://mail.pbworldnet.com/exchange/forms/I PM/NOTE/read.asp?command=open&ob,.. 3/6/02 Traffic Control Excerpts from Draft Initial,Study • Pages 2-12 to 2-1 Traffic Control Plan The proposed sewer improvements are expected to take approximately three months. Construction is anticipated to begin in Spring 2002 and to end in Summer 2002. A traffic control plan would be implemented during the construction of the project (See Figures, 7a, 67b, and 7c Traffic Control Plan). The following is a summary of the traffic control plan for each affected road(Walnut Street,Juniper Avenue, South Highland Avenue, and Sierra Avenue). • Walnut Avenue Walnut Avenue would not be closed during construction of the sewer improvements. One lane Two lanes of traffic would be open at all times during construction. Traffic would not be able to make left turns onto Juniper Avenue and/or Cypress Avenue from Walnut Street during construction. Appropriate signage would be posted at locations along Walnut Street to inform vehicles of lane closures, lane narrowing, merging, and shoulder work ahead, as well as other necessary directions. Additionally, a sign would be placed at either end of project area on Walnut Street informing vehicles that construction has ended or is starting. Figure 6,Proposed Improvements for Sewer Line D Figure 7a, Traffic Control Plan Figure 7b, Traffic Control Plan Figure 7c, Traffic Control Plan • Barricades would be placed west of Cypress Avenue along Walnut Street, K-rails would also be placed along either side of the sewer improvement area.These barricades would be removed once the sewer improvements are finished. Steel plates would be placed at the intersection of Cypress Avenue and Walnut Street to cover up the necessary trench during construction. • Juniper Avenue Juniper Avenue would not be intermittently closed during the sewer construction. Juniper Avenue would be closed to traffic from_.Walnut to approximately 300 feet north with local residents existing the area by traveling north on the open portion of Juniper Avenue to South Highland Avenue. When sewer construction is taking place in front of the residences on Juniper Avenue access to northbound Juniper Avenue would be coordinated with the contractor and facilitated with steel plates or the use of temporary pavement. Once the construction passes the residences Juniper Avenue would be closed from the residences to South Highland Avenue.Two lanes of traffic would be open at all times during construction. Northbound and southbound traffic would each be one lane._ No left turns onto Juniper Avenue or South Highland Avenue would be allowed during construction. Signs indicating that road work is taking place ahead would be located at the on Juniper Avenue,right before Sierra Avenue. Additionally, signs would be posted along the project site portion of Juniper Avenue directing vehicles of up coming road conditions, as well as open trenches. Additionally, steel plates; as well as K rail barricades, would be placed along Juniper Avenue. • These barricades would be removed once the sewer improvements are finished. South Highland Avenue and Sierra Avenue • The proposed sewer line would be constructed just north of South Highland Avenue. Both lanes on South Highland Avenue would be open during construction. Signs indicating shoulder work would be placed along the northern shoulder of the road. Signs instructing vehicles of construction activities, as well as instructions for vehicles,would be placed along South Highland Avenue and at the intersection of Sierra Avenue and South Highland Avenue. Additionally, K- rail barricades would be placed on the north and south side of the sewer improvements. The K- I rails would be removed once construction was completed. Left turns onto Sierra Avenue, as well as South Highland Avenue, would be prohibited during construction. Additionally, all lanes on Sierra Avenue are proposed to be open during the sewer construction. Traffic controls would be implemented along the portion of Sierra Avenue where the sewer line would be constructed to reduce traffic hazards. • Pages 3-29 to 3-31 3.15 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC The proposed project would include construction of approximately 5,100 linear feet of sewer line, approximately 10 feet under existing grade along Walnut Street from Cypress Avenue to Juniper Avenue; along Juniper Avenue from Walnut Street to South Highland Avenue; adjacent to South Highland Avenue from Juniper Avenue to Sierra Avenue; and adjacent to Sierra Avenue from South Highland Avenue and Sierra Avenue intersection, south for approximately 100 feet. The project also includes construction of 15 manholes along the proposed sewer line to allow for maintenance of the sewer line. Walnut Street is a two-lane road that traverses the City of Fontana in a west to east fashion. Walnut Street is designated as a Secondary Highway in the City's General Plan. Juniper Avenue is also a two-lane roadway that crosses the City in a north to south fashion. It is designated as a Collector Road in the General Plan. South Highland Avenue is designated as a Primary Highway in the Fontana General Plan a. It is a two-land road and traverses the City in a west to east fashion. Omnitrans provides public transit services in San Bernardino County. The nearest Omnitrans Routes are 26 and 66. Route 29 runs along Baseline Avenue to Walnut Street and Route 66 runs along Citrus Avenue to Walnut Street and then along Walnut Street. (Sources: Site Survey, Fontana General Plan, Annual Average Daily Traffic, and Omnitrans Busbook) A. Would the project cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? Less than Significant Impact. During construction, Walnut Street, Juniper Avenue, South Highland Avenue, and Sierra Avenue would remain open to two way traffic, and Juniper Avenue to limited traffic restricted to residents living along Juniper Avenue only. When the roadway remains open, unsignalized intersections may become congested as turning vehicles could temporarily block through traffic. Excavation and construction at intersections may also block traffic flows. In accordance with City regulations and Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (Greenbook), barriers, guards, lights, signs, temporary bridges, flag persons and watch persons shall be provided during construction to promote traffic safety and convenience. The project would also implement a traffic control plan,which would facilitate the flow of traffic along the project site. Once construction is completed, the sewer line and manholes would not increase traffic. Occasional maintenance of the sewer line may cause slowing in traffic along the portion of the line that is being worked on. However, this temporary slowing of traffic would be considered less than significant. (Sources: Site Survey, Fontana General Plan, Traffic Control Plan, Greenbook, and Improvement Plan) • B. Would the project exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? No Impact. During construction, Walnut Street, Juniper Avenue, South Highland Avenue, and Sierra Avenue would remain a two-lane roadways and would be open, while Walnut Avenue would be restricted to one lane. Access to all parcels located along the affected segment would be available at all times. The proposed sewer line and manholes would not lead to an increase in Levels of Service (LOS) along Walnut Street, Juniper Avenue, South Highland Avenue, and/or Sierra Avenue. Therefore,no impact is expected. (Sources: Site Survey and Fontana Engineering Department) C. Would the project result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? No Impact. There are no airports near the project site or air traffic patterns above the roadways. The improvement project involves the construction of a sewer line and manholes. The proposed project would not involve air transportation nor affect air traffic at the Ontario International Airport or Rialto Municipal Airport. Thus, no impact on air traffic patterns would occur with the project. (Sources: Site Survey and Thomas Guide to San Bernardino and Riverside Counties) D. Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses(e.g.,farm equipment)? Less than Significant Impact. The proposed improvements would involve the construction of a sewer line and manholes along portions of Walnut Street, Juniper Avenue, South Highland Avenue, and Sierra Avenue and would not introduce design hazards or incompatible uses. No roadway hazards are anticipated. During construction, two lanes on South. Highland Avenue and Sierra Avenue the streets would continue to be available to accommodate existing vehicles using these roadways, and one lane on Walnut Avenue. A temporary elimination of turning lanes may occur at intersections, which could temporarily block through traffic. In addition, excavation at intersections would also affect traffic flows. However, construction activities shall be conducted in accordance with Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (Greenbook) and City regulations. Additionally, a traffic control plan would be implemented. Construction signs, warning lights (flares, lanterns, electric markers, or flashers), barriers, temporary bridges, flag persons, and watch persons shall be provided • along the portions of Walnut Street, Juniper Avenue, South Highland Avenue, and Sierra Avenue were the sewer improvements would be made to facilitate traffic flow and access. Also, construction equipment would not be stored on public streets, but within the construction easements for the project. Thus, impacts are expected to be less than significant. (Sources: Site Survey, USGS Fontana Quadrangle, Greenbook, Traffic Control Plan and Fontana Engineering Department) E. Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? Less than Significant Impact. During construction, Walnut Sirect34-unip@i=-A-vei1ue;--and South Highland and Sierra Avenue would continue to be open for two-way traffic, and Walnut Avenue for one way traffic. Access to all parcels located along the affected segments of Wwalnut Street, Juniper Avenue, South Highland Avenue, and Sierra Avenue would be available at all times, so as not to preclude emergency response and evacuation. Some excavation work at intersections could hamper or obstruct pass_through traffic when turning vehicles are present. In accordance with City regulations, safe crossing for vehicles shall be maintained at all times at intersections, alleys, and private driveways and for pedestrians at 500-foot intervals, with one safe crossing maintained at all times. Free access to fire hydrants and all water gates and gas valves shall also be maintained at all times. Thus, emergency vehicle access would be maintained. Notification of the Police and Fire Departments of the sewer construction schedule would also allow emergency vehicles to use alternate routes for emergency response. (Sources: Site Survey, City Code Section 25-186, Greenbook, and Fontana Engineering Department) F. Would the project result in inadequate parking capacity? No Impact. The proposed sewer improvements would not change the parking along Walnut Street, Juniper Avenue, South Highland Avenue, and/or Sierra Avenue. Thus, no change in the parking capacity of the area would occur with the proposed project. (Sources:Site Survey,Improvement Plan, and Fontana Engineering Department) . G. Would the project conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Less than Significant Impact. The Omnitrans Bus Route 29 and 66 run along Walnut Street through the project site. Construction at the intersections along the bus route may cause traffic delays, which would cause delays in bus service in the area. However, this impact is considered less than significant. In the Fontana General Plan, there are no designated bike routes/bike paths planned along the project site. Therefore, implementation of the sewer improvement project would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation. (Sources: Site Survey, Fontana General Plan, Omnitrans, Fontana General Plan, and Fontana Engineering Department) RE: South Highland Sewer Neg. Dec. Page 1 of Ir4 ( 1s1071 1 )04- * ) ? [Close From: Tom Holliman [SMTP:tomh@assoc-eng.com] To: Harvilla, George Cc: Subject: RE: South Highland Sewer Neg. Dec. Sent: 3/6/02 4:54 PM Importance: Normal Hi George, I have attached an edited version of the EIR text. Based on our idea of how the contractor will implement this job. South Highland Sierra would remain open to two way traffic. Walnut would be open to one way traffic with a flagman. Juniper would be closed in portions to allow for the work but still allow the residents to get in and out of their houses, but not general traffic. We are revising the traffic control plans to reflect our expected construction sequencing and will provide updates drawings in the next few days. If you have any questions let me know. Tom Holliman traffic control EIR comments with edits 3 6 02.doc htt ://mail. bworldnet.com/exchan e/ ? _p p g forms/IPM/NOTE/read.asp.command open&ob,.. 3/6/02 0 DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES INC. TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 21,2002 PAGES: TO: George Harvilla TELEPHONE NO: City of Fontana 3413 Sierra Ave. FAX NO: Fontana, CA 92335 FROM: Rebecca Harrington TELEPHONE NO: (619)260-3420 8989 Rio San Diego Drive Ste.335 FAX NO: (619)260-3428 San Diego, CA 92108 PROJECT: S.Highland/Juniper Avenue Sewer Line PROJECT NO: FONT0000-0008 ❑AS YOU REQUESTED ❑ FOR YOUR APPROVAL ❑ RETURN REQUESTED ❑ FOR YOUR INFORMATION ❑ RECORDS MANAGEMENT ❑ FOR YOUR USE ITEM COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 1 11 2/21/2002 Gralphics for Negative Declaration COMMENTS: 0 DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES INC. FACSIMILE DATE: February 7,2002 PAGES: 12 TO: Mr. George Harvilla FAX NO: (909)350-7676 Mr.Ben Minamide City of Fontan-Engineering TELEPHONE NO: Department FROM: Rebecca Harrington FAX NO: (619)260-3428 TELEPHONE NO: (619)260-3420 SUBJECT: South Highland Sewer Improvement Neg Dec PROJECT: South Highland Avenue and Juniper Avenue Sewer System Improveemnts PROJECT NO: FONT0000-0008 COPIES: FAX NO: ORIGINAL TO FOLLOW: ❑ REGULAR MAIL ® OVERNIGHT MAIL ❑ COURIER ❑ N/A COMMENTS: George, Attached are the graphics for the South Highland Avenue and Juniper Avenue Sewer System Improvements Draft Negative Declaration. Thanks, Rebecca 8989 Rio San Diego Drive,Suite 335 San Diego CA 92108 Phone:(619)260-3420 Facsimile:(619)260-3428 Draft ND for South Highland and Juniper Sewer System Improvements Page 1 of INIIH1F8I ? os '. From: Rebecca Harrington [SMTP:Rsha@deainc.com] To: Harvilla, George Cc: Karen Ruggels; Josephine Alido Subject: Draft ND for South Highland and Juniper Sewer System Improvements Sent: 2/15/02 6:39 PM Importance: Normal Hi George, Attached is the draft Negative Declaration (ND)for the South Highland Avenue and Juniper Avenue Sewer System Improvement project. I am overnighting copies of the graphics, so they should be there by Monday. Please call or e-mail me with any concerns you may have. Additionally, please verify that the construction period will be 3 months. Thanks and have a good weekend, Rebecca cover.doc nchecklist.doc table-oc.doc nsect 4 and 5.doc Tsect1.doc dsect2.doc nsect3.doc(G. is- cover.doc http://mail.pbworldnet.com/exchange/forms/I PM/NOTE/read.asp?command=open&o.. 2/15/0 RE: South Highland Avenue and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvement ND Page 1 of 1 Harvilla, George From: Ben Minamide [bminamide@fontana.org] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 11:11 AM To: 'Rebecca Harrington'; harvilla@pbworld.com;Tom Holliman -Associated Engrs. (E-mail) Cc: Karen Ruggels; Josephine Alido Subject: RE: South Highland Avenue and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvement ND Tom Holliman,this is your link to John Evans&Asso. on Neg Dec who need info on addition to basic sewer project for extension to serve additional lot generally at S.E. corner of Highland @ Sierra. Please contact Rebecca.thx. Ben Minamide Original Message From: Rebecca Harrington [mailto:Rsha@deainc.coml Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:16 AM To: bminamide@fontana.org; harvilla@pbworld.com Cc: Karen Ruggels;Josephine Alido Subject: South Highland Avenue and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvement ND Please review the attached Draft Negative Declaration (ND)for the South Highland Avenue and Juniper Avenue Sewer System Improvement project. Please e-mail,fax, and/or discuss any comments over the phone (my phone number is 619 260-3420)with me or Josephine Alido (her phone number is 909 481-5750). It is our understanding that additional sewer improvements may be made along Sierra Avenue. Please discuss with David Evans and Associates these additional improvements and/or forward any necessary plans depicting these improvements, if they are going to be added to the project. We will then add this portion of sewer improvements to the Draft ND. Thanks, Rebecca Harrington Project Manager 2/7/2002 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:59 AM To: 'Rebecca Harrington' Subject: RE: South Highland Avenue and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvement ND Thanks. Please send the overnite package to Ben's address at Fontana City Hall. George Original Message From: Rebecca Harrington fmailto:Rsha@deainc.coml Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:55 AM To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: South Highland Avenue and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvement ND The graphics are not electronic and some are in 11x17 but I will shrink them down to 8.5 x 11 and fax them to you. Additionally, I will overnight you clean copies of the graphics. Thanks, Rebecca "Harvilla, George"<Harvilla@pbworld.com>02/07/02 09:41AM »> Rebecca, The Figures are just blank sheets. Are you still working on them?, If you have them, and they are not e-mailable, please fax them to Ben's fax number. Thanks, George Original Message From: Rebecca Harrington Finailto:Rsha@deainc.coml Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:16 AM To: bminamide@fontana.orq; Harvilla, George Cc: Karen Ruggels;Josephine Alido Subject: South Highland Avenue and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvement ND « File: checklist.doc»« File: cover.doc»« File: is-cover.doc»« File: sect1.doc»« File: sect2.doc» « File: sect3.doc »« File: table-oc.doc »« File: sect 4 and 5.doc » Please review the attached Draft Negative Declaration (ND)for the South Highland Avenue and Juniper Avenue Sewer System Improvement project. Please e-mail, fax, and/or discuss any comments over the phone (my phone number is 619 260-3420) with me or Josephine Alido (her phone number is 909 481- 5750). It is our understanding that additional sewer improvements may be made along Sierra Avenue. Please discuss with David Evans and Associates these additional improvements and/or forward any necessary plans depicting these improvements, if they are going to be added to the project.We will then add this portion of sewer improvements to the Draft ND. Thanks, Rebecca Harrington Project Manager FW South Highland Sewer Page 1 of 1 °71 14- 1 close` From: Harvilla, George To: 'rsha@deainc.com'; 'tomh@assoc-eng.com' Cc: 'pbalbach@fontana.org'; 'cpursel@fontana.org' Subject: FW: South Highland Sewer Sent: 2/11/02 6:34 PM Importance: Normal Rebecca, I checked and was told that meeting the March 5 City Council deadline was not critical. So let's follow this schedule: �D H� 1)Tom transmits the lateral plans to DEA, by tomorrow if possible 2) DEA makes necessary revisions to the IS/Neg. Dec. and forwards to me 3) I initiate the City review process 4) DEA addresses the City's comments 5) Newspaper notice is published 6)20-Day Public review period 7) City Council approval (date to be determined) Thank you DEA and Associated for your quick responses. George Harvilla Original Message From: Harvilla, George To: 'rsha@deainc.com' Cc: 'pbalbach@fontana.org'; 'tomh@assoc-eng.com' Sent: 2/11/02 5:36 PM Subject: South Highland Sewer Rebecca, http://mail.pbworldnet.com/exchange/forms/IPM/NOTE/read.asp?command=open&o.. 2/11/0 FW: South Highland Sewer Page 2 of I just spoke to Tom Holliman, the Project Manger for Associated Engineers, which is the firm preparing the plans for the South Highland Sewer. I explained to him what you told me on the phone, that if you could get the plans for the lateral extension in the next day or two, you can finalize your IS/Neg. Dec. by this Thursday. This will allow the project to go before the City Council in May. Tom thinks he can get you a design sometime tomorrow. He would like to e-mail you an AutoCAD file (two sheets). Hopefully, this is OK. You recently e-mailed me the Draft IS/Neg. Dec. and I was going to start circulating it within the City. However, I think I will wait until you can modify it with this new information, and then cirulcate it. Do you agree with this approach? George Harvilla http://mail.pbworldnet.com/exchange/forms/IPM/NOTE/read.asp?command=open&o.. 2/11/0 Harvilla,George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:36 PM To: 'Rebecca Harrington' Subject: RE: New Plans Thanks for the quick turnaround. George Original Message From: Rebecca Harrington imailto:Rsha@deainc.coml Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:24 PM To: Harvilla, George Cc: Karen Ruggels Subject: New Plans Hi George, I have been out at meetings all day and just was able to plot the new plans for the sewer lateral. I will start to revise the Draft ND tomorrow and will be able to e-mail you a revised version on Friday. I just thought I would update you on the progress. Please call me if you have any questions or concerns. Thanks, Rebecca • RE: Neg. Dec. for South Highland Sewer Page 1 of From: Debbie Brazil! [SMTP:dbrazill@fontana.org] To: 'Harvilla, George' Cc: Subject: RE: Neg. Dec. for South Highland Sewer Sent: 2/12/02 4:40 PM Importance: Normal Thank you. Debbie Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 1:35 PM To: 'dbrazill@fontana.org' Cc: 'pbalbach@fontana.org'; 'rbragg@fontana.org'; 'cpursel@fontana.org' Subject: Neg. Dec. for South Highland Sewer Hi Debbie, This e-mail is to let you know that in about a week, I will be receiving the Initial Study/Neg. Dec. from David Evans and Associates for the South Highland Sewer. I will then forward it to you for review by you/your staff. Sincerely, George Harvilla http://mail.pbworldnet.com/exchange/forms/IPM/NOTE/read.asp?command=open&o.. 2/12/0 Harviiia,'GeoJt'ge From: Harvilla, George Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 11:18 AM To: 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.' Cc: Carlos Navarro(cnavarro@fontana.org); 'Tom Holliman'; 'Ralph Roberts'; Ralph Roberts at Home (coralph@earthlink.net) Scott, I think having the pipe supplier/manufacturer present is a good idea. Carlos will let us know the location, most likely the engineering building behind City Hall. George Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 11:03 AM To: Harvilla@pbworld.com Cc: cnavarro@fontana.org; tomh@assoc-eng.com; ralphr@assoc-eng.com; coralph@earthlink.net; rbragg@fontana.org; cpursel@fontana.org Subject: Re: FW: Video Inspection of South Highland Sewer I'll contact Mission Pipe about attending the meeting to view the video if you would like to have their input? Please let me know. For myself I think any day next week will work. Will it be at Associated's office or at City Hall? "Harvilla, George" wrote: Video Inspection of South Highland Sewer 105 Clean DocumentEmail • RE: Payment Page 1 of 1 Harvilla, George From: Ray Bragg [rbragg@fontana.org] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 5:20 To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: Payment Thanks George. I had a telephone conversation with Mr. Snyder this afternoon. Regardless of the reasons, I believe we are doing all we can to get him his check in a timely fashion. Ray Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 3:27 PM To: 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.' Cc: Ray Bragg (E-mail); Carla Pursel (E-mail) Subject: RE: Payment Scott, I have responded to your various e-mails, in which I told you the City is doing everything possible to expedite payment. Carla is working with the Finance Department to hopefully get you a check on Thursday, November 7. George Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [mailto:adgenengr@ directvinternet.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 1:30 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: Payment I must assume since you have not responded to my E-mails regarding payment #3 and the requirment of our check by tomorrow Friday 11/01/02 that there is no check. I will be calling the Director of Public Works today to have this problem resolved. We cannot continue waiting on payment due to the disregard of others in performance of their duties. 11/1/2002 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 3:27 PM To: 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.' Cc: Ray Bragg (E-mail); Carla Pursel (E-mail) Subject: RE: Payment Scott, I have responded to your various e-mails, in which I told you the City is doing everything possible to expedite payment. Carla is working with the Finance Department to hopefully get you a check on Thursday, November 7. George Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 1:30 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: Payment I must assume since you have not responded to my E-mails regarding payment #3 and the requirment of our check by tomorrow Friday 11/01/02 that there is no check: I will be calling the Director of Public Works today to have this problem resolved. We cannot continue waiting on payment due to the disregard of others in performance of their duties. 1 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 8:32 AM To: 'Carla Pursel' Subject: FW: PROGRESS PAYMENT Carla, I used the word "hopefully" just in case something fell through at Finance. As usual, please do everything you can to ensure payment on Thursday. Thanks, George Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 5:14 PM To: George Harvilla Subject: PROGRESS PAYMENT Hopefully is not good enough. We must have a difinite answer as to when payment will be made.The facts are the pay request should have been processed the first of October as required per contract specs. Failure to comply with the contract specs. has created a financial hardship on us. 1 I Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 12:48 PM To: 'Carla Pursel' Subject: FW: Pay Request#3 Importance: High Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 12:46 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: Pay Request #3 George, If we do not have a check by this Friday 11/01/02, I will speak with Fontana's Director of Public Works. I will see what they have to say about this. Hopefully that is all I talk with him about. 1 Harvilla, George From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 30,2002 12:52 PM To: Harvilla, George I may be wrong George but I think you are doing what you can which is appreciated. However this does not change the fact that how this has been handled is atrocious. At the meeting we had that should of had nothing to do with progress payment #3, but did, it was made out as if the payment would be made in a week. Where is it? 1 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Wednesday, October 30,2002 12:46 PM To: 'Carla Pursel' Cc: 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.' Subject: FW: Status of Pay Request#3 Importance: High Carla, Please continue to do everything you can to expedite A. D. General's payment. Thanks, George ****************************************************************** From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 12:39 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: Re: Status of Pay Request #3 You do not realize the hardship this is causing for my company. I am sure that Associated makes certain their progress pay request's are processed on time. It is now over a month from when I asked Assoc. to go over the progress payment #3 and I'm hearing I may still be waiting another two weeks. This is wrong, very very wrong. Original Message On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:34:56 -0800 (PST) , "Harvilla, George" wrote: Status of Pay Request #3 Scott/Jodie, According to Carla Pursel at the city, it should be ready by next week or the following week at the latest. George Harvilla 1 got 29 02 11 : 55a 00000000000000000000. 559-5502 p. 1 Al General Engineering Construction Inca 1tTd N.Gi noaKs Blvd,Ste 1061101 9 Burbank,Ca 91504 Phone(818)569-7883 9 Fax(81 B)559Z502 Oct( tr 29,2002 FA TO: George llarvilla Parsons .Brinkerhoff (909) 427-9169 FR 1 : Jodie Snyder Hi I :urge, Col i you give me an update on Pay Request#3. The end of the month is near and everybody wai ;a date as to when I can pay them. I also would like to pick this check up if possible. Thy k you for your help. Jod Snyder f t HarrYAO,George .. From: Harvilla, George Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 8:57 AM To: 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.' Subject: Status of Pay Request#3 Scott/Jodie, According to Carla Pursel at the city, it should be ready by next week or the following week at the latest. George Harvilla Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:35 PM To: 'rsandoval@fontana.org' Subject: FW: Video Inspection of South Highland Sewer FYI Original Message From: Harvilla, George Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 10:04 AM To: 'Carlos Navarro' Cc: 'Tom Holliman'; Ralph Roberts (ralphr@ assoc-eng.com); 'Ralph Roberts at Home'; 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.'; Carla Purse! (cpursel@ fontana.org) Subject: Video Inspection of South Highland Sewer Carlos, Please let us know when you will report your findings from the video surveillance of the South Highland Sewer. Thank you, George Harvilla Consultant Project Manager Harvilla, George From: Tom Holliman [tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:14 AM To: 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.' Cc: George Harvilla (E-mail); "Ralph Roberts"@uunet.uu.net Subject: RE: Line C Boring Claim-Fontana Sewer Scott, Expect a response to Ayala's claim and your claim for the irrigation pipe by Wednesday. Tom H. Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 12:02 AM To: TOM HOLLIMAN Cc: George Harvilla Subject: Line C Boring Claim-Fontana Sewer Do you have a response to the claim submitted for the extra work on Line C Boring operation? If not when will you? 1 Harvilla, George From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:29 PM To: George Harvilla Cc: TOM HOLLIMAN; RALPH ROBERTS Subject: Video Inspection of Sewer Line I want to assure you that I will take care of things if there is found to be a possible problem. I have performed tens of thousands of feet of sewer lining Inspections with pre and post video's required. It's been my discovery that the video can be of excellent clarity and quality in recording but can be misleading when viewed. Not to say you don't, but, if one does not have experience in viewing these tapes things can look out of proportion quite easily and look like something it is not. With 99% of the time the item of concern appearing larger than it really is. Other things come into play such as discoloring in material as well as a scratch which can appear to be a crack or defect. With some experience you learn to detect things which help in size ratio and other such things I described. I offer any assistance I'm able if you like. Also I suggest if you feel there is a problem to have the Mission Pipe Rep view the tape with you. They want to give the best product and will give an unbiased opinion. Also keep in mind the nature V.C.P. is to have some shrinkage cracks and some blisters from the baking process. The Green Book covers this giving tolerances acceptable before a section is in need of repair or rejected. Again, the video is from a miniature camera lens and not the true optics of the eye. It is our mission at A.D. to provide the best in quality and workmanship in all we do, and to assist in every manner we're capable to accomplish such. SCOTT A. SNYDER PRESIDENT A.D. GEN. ENGR. CONST. INC. 1 s Harvil a,Gerry .... --. From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday, October 24,2002 11:36 AM To: 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.'; Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com); 'Ralph Roberts at Home';Tom Holliman (tomh @ assoc-eng.com) Subject: FW: Striping Ralph told me that the striping is complete. I just drove it and it looks good. Thanks Scott. The only thing we're still waiting on is word from Carlos regarding any needed repairs based on the video surveillance. George Original Message From: Harvilla, George Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:04 PM To: 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.' Cc: Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com); 'Ralph Roberts at Home'; Tom Holliman' Subject: Striping Hi Scott, Any word on the striping? George Harvilla, George From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 12:38 PM To: George Harvilla • Subject: Striping Glad to hear all looks good. Thank you for informing me. • Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 4:19 PM To: 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.' Subject: RE: Personal Scott, Thank you for the kind compliments. My boss' name and address are: Mr. Bedros Agopovich Parsons Brinckerhoff Engineers 685 E. Carnegie Drive #210 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 1:53 PM To: George Harvilla Subject: Personal George I want to thank you for attending the meeting Friday. I'm sure you would have been present anyway, but even still your presence allowed for a productive calm meeting. I'm not continuing on with things but, I wish Tom would have used his abilities he showed he was capable of on this project, and not just at Friday's meeting. Also George I know from my twenty four years {wow that's a long time, makes me feel old} in Public Works Construction, that had I been a person of different morals or bluntly like most, things would have been very different. If not for you and I then definitely so. George feel good about doing a good job. Because frankly I looked at your efforts and your attitude in working with me. It was this alone which prevented me from making things shall we say, unpleasant for us all. I dont know if that means anything to you but for me It's giving you a very high compliment. So if you would I would like your office's address and who's in charge so I may write them a short letter simply stating they have a valuable person in you. Of course I will wait until after our business is completed. 1 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 4:12 PM To: 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.' Subject: RE: Irrigation Line Claim for Extra Scott, At the end of Friday's meeting, you said you were not going to submit a claim for this. Have you changed your mind? George Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 1:18 PM To: George Harvilla; TOM HOLLIMAN Subject: Irrigation Line Claim for Extra I mentioned during Friday's meeting that we would submit our claim for the Irrigation Line worked on encountered during Line B installation, {Juniper Ave. } . It appears we have all the information we've been waiting on to know our cost's in order to submit claim for payment. We are going to submit as a lump sum total for time reason's as well as cost's. Because if a breakdown is wanted than we must add to the amount owed since the standard markup on the small amount does not nearly cover cost's involved. 1 Harvilla, George From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 6:18 PM To: George Harvilla Subject: Claim No I was speaking about the claim for excess water used and labor for extra jet time. At the meeting I brought this up and after outside I said forget that change for excess water and labor. As for the Irrigation line I cant possibly drop this. As it was we did many things out there which all cost money. Like removing the trash from the middle of the roadway, the telephone conduit which we had to keep going back and forth to, this telephone also made it that I could not place 4 M.H. 's at a time. I said to you and Ralph on site early on that I would do four at a time. But afterwards the tele duct incident made that not possible, that cost me an additional $247.00 per manhole which for those cost me $988.00 extra. Just for the M.H. 's. Then I did not even bring up the money it cost me to skip over this section start at another section then go back to this section off again and back to it. Bryan had to remove the shoring the contractor put in because it was totally unsafe. For us to work in and reinstall in. As well as remove the road plates then reset them put more cold mix down around plates. In fact Bryan said that had we not gone to work on the piping when they said we could that day there would have been a trench failure due from the shoring. He said the shoring fell down just from him trouching the jacks, not while removing to redo but from just touching them. What tragedy WE prevented will never be know thank God. Then initially we potholed this said the tele was to low gave Ralph a redesign which went under it without having any delay or extra cost. I lowered the sewer design for this portion to clear this and gave this info to ralph. He said he wanted to see it again so we redug it out. I didnt bill for that either. I redesign the entire job raising the line which you know how that went but I did so because Associated said yes it would work. I even have an inner dept correspondence between them to you and the city which they said redisgn looks good and recommended approval. Now you tell me how is it possible for the Company who designed and drew the plans/system can not know it was a waste of time. Not anybody's time but mine to be exact. I worked three day's on them for what? I bet they charged over $25 thousand for them and I did it in three days and got nothing to show for it but made to feel like an idiot at that meeting. But how was I to know I could not I only had to go off what the DESIGNING ENGINEERING FIRM WHO DREW & DESIGNED THE DAM THING SAID. THEY SAID GOOD IDEA DO IT, AND EVEN RECOMMENDED YOU GUYS APPROVE IT. WHO'S NOT DOING THEIR JOB HERE GEORGE. I have given so much worth in free stuff that the meeting we had Friday along with this Irrigation is going to make it that I may not lose money, but maybe break even. I told you I have so many claims I can make all with Writen backup which never was responded to by your design firm. Ball Park cost's for these things I was willing to drop is $70,000.00 plus damages awarded by court plus reimbusement of attourney fee's. And all the time for you guys to prepare how much will not could will cost the City? Two- Three Hundred Thousand. Oh and include the damages caused from not processing my pay request which I have written documentation on three seperate day's saying we must meet to go over quantities. None were responded to. So because of you guy's I have late charges over $3k to date and still no check. How well will that go over with the City and Courts. This is just ONE of several. I am not making up anything, I have it all documented and backed up in WRITING. Look back on Friday and you saw maybe three request's of mine unanswered. I have over thirty for 1 probably 15 seperate items. I am sorry to be this way but enough is enough. 2 Harvilla, George From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 6:41 PM To: George Harvilla Subject: ReClaim • George I dont mean to go off on you with that E-mail but what else can be expected? I have no doubts we have been the best Contractor you all have ever had. And what I said on claims is not stretching anything. I truely hope I dont have to go that route but I cannot drop another claim. This claim is around $8500.00 which is nothing compared to the amounts for all I have. I am offering this simply because I need to pay my bills and avoid any more late fee's. If you guy's dont want to pay what I am intitiled to on this claim than I have no choice, I have to file a law suit. And just take that one case of Associated messing up my payment, which contract law states must get to me within 30 day's. Just this one item alone cost's the City or whoever ten's of thousands in damages. I am only trying to let you see the huge ballon this will grow to. I hope you dont take it otherwise. But should you does not change the fact's of all the proof I have in support of my claims. Look at the fact's George, Friday's meeting should have shown you just who has done their job and who hasnt, who has back up and who does not. It ought to be as plain as day. I hope it is. Regardless George none of this is personal, it's strictly business. I'm just trying to save a lot of headaches. I just want to be done with it all. It's up to you though cause this one claim if denied means I have no choice but take the next step which I only do because I'm so sure of my case. What more can be said? I just have to wait for the reply to my claim. 1 Harvilla, George From: Scott A.Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 6:53 PM To: George Harvilla Subject: Re Claim Again George, One last try here. Please take a moment and think how many people would be so open and honest as Jodie and I about the Ayala situation. And others situations I'm sure you can think of if you take the time to. What I said on the claims is no different. If I had the money laying around I may not try like I have to keep from going to court cause I feel that positive I would win atleast 85-90 percent of the claims which is a lot of money. 1 1 _ , _ Harvilla, George . . enen Engr.Gen.From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. [adgenengr@directvinternet.com]g [ g gr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 1:18 PM To: George Harvilla; TOM HOLLIMAN Subject: Irrigation Line Claim for Extra I mentioned during Friday's meeting that we would submit our claim for the Irrigation Line worked on encountered during Line B installation,{Juniper Ave.}. It appears we have all the information we've been waiting on to know our cost's in order to submit claim for payment.We are going to submit as a lump sum total for time reason's as well as cost's. Because if a breakdown is wanted than we must add to the amount owed since the standard markup on the small amount does not nearly cover cost's involved. , Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 4:19 PM To: 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.' Subject: RE: Personal Scott, Thank you for the kind compliments. My boss' name and address are: Mr. Bedros Agopovich Parsons Brinckerhoff Engineers 685 E. Carnegie Drive#210 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.fmailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.coml Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 1:53 PM To: George Harvilla Subject: Personal George I want to thank you for attending the meeting Friday. I'm sure you would have been present anyway, but even still your presence allowed for a productive calm meeting. I'm not continuing on with things but, I wish Tom would have used his abilities he showed he was capable of on this project, and not just at Friday's meeting. Also George I know from my twenty four years {wow that's a long time, makes me feel old} in Public Works Construction,that had been a person of different morals or bluntly like most,things would have been very different. If not for you and I then definitely so. George feel good about doing a good job. Because frankly I looked at your efforts and your attitude in working with me. It was this alone which prevented me from making things shall we say, unpleasant for us all. I dont know if that means anything to you but for me It's giving you a very high compliment. So if you would I would like your office's address and who's in charge so I may write them a short letter simply stating they have a valuable person in you. Of course I will wait until after our business is completed. , 1/20 October 30, 2002 Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements-Claim for Extra Work for Replacement of Irrigation Line on Juniper Avenue Mr. Snyder, We have reviewed your claim in the amount of $8,700.00 for the subject work and have concluded that the claim does not qualify for approval under the terms of Contract Number SP- 46-02. The terms of the contract provide specific requirements and conditions that must be met before a claim for extra work can be approved. Those requirements and conditions are spelled out in the following referenced sections of the contract. In accordance with Section 5-4, Relocation, of the latest edition of the "Greenbook" which �� applies to..this project. "When the-Plans or_Specifications provide for the Contractor to alter, relocate,"or reconstruct a utility,all cost for such work shall be incl dn t1 d eTBir r the items --of;workrnecessitatingTsuchwvork., Temporary or permanent relocation or alternation of utilities requested by the Contractor for its.convenience shall be its responsibility and it shall make all arrangements and e tr411 costs." \ .\ `"xi The new sewer pipeline being laid across the irrigation main was more than five feet below the irrigation pipe and its encasement. Further,the standard joint length of pipeline being laid was longer than the approximately three-foot width of the encasement. Instead of tunneling under the conduit as you did with the PacBell conduit interference at Juniper and Walnut, and the curb and gutter on Juniper to install the house laterals, you elected to remove the pipeline for your convenience. From our review ofethe work it appears that your decision was based on your desire not to remove and reset the shield you were using for shoring the trench wall. Therefore in order to continue to "drag" the shield you removed the pipeline. Keeping in mind that you determine your own methods of coistruction, it is clear that this removal and replacement was not "required" to complete the project as designed. Further there is no reason to believe that the sewer pipe could not be installed without removing the irrigation pipe. Therefore Section 5-4 places the full cost of the replacement on the Contractor. If you wish to dispute these findings you can exercise your right to dispute this work under the terms of the contract. Section 3-5 contains the provisions for handling situations where the Contractor and the Agency are unable to reach agreement on disputed work. Yours truly, Thomas R. Holliman,PE Senior Project Manager CC: George Harvilla, City of Fontana Ralph Roberts, A-E Harvilla, George From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 11:38 AM To: Harvilla, George; Ralph Roberts Cc: TOM HOLLIMAN; RALPH ROBERTS Subject: Video Tape Findings Please let me know of your findings concerning the video tape of the sewer main line. If you believe there is a problem this is what I intend to do. I will ask Mission Pipe to send out a rep to view the tape along with us. Then go from there. If we are directed to excavate and replace this section then we shall. However, since the line passed all testing and regardless if the rep agrees with the Engineer as to replacing this section, this shall not relieve the Agency from compensating A.D. for cost's plus mark up if, the pipe is within acceptable tolerances per the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. SCOTT A. SNYDER A.D. GEN. ENGR. CONST. INC. 1 1 Page 1 of 1 tSubj - South Highalnd Sewer Invoice Date 10/19/2002 12:17:10 PM Pacific.Daylight Time From �GHarvilla To tort hAassoc eng corn adgenengradirectvinternet.com Scott, On Pay Estimate No. 3, for Bid Item 7, under Contract Quantity, it should now be"80" instead of"120"since it was changed by the Change Order. Tom, Since the Ayala Claim was called "Change Order No. 2", do you want to rename the claim discussed yesterday (with all the pipe and manhole adjustments)as"No. 3"? George P.S. please do not respond directly to this e-mail account. If necessary, respond to harvilla@pbworld.com. Saturday, October 19, 2002 America Online: GHarvilla Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 11:42 AM To: 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.' Cc: TOM HOLLIMAN Subject: RE: Pay Request#3 Scott, The quantities you show on Pay Estimate No. #3 (which I saw for the first time on Oct. 15 when you faxed it to me) do not agree with the inspector' s. We will have to agree on the quantities at this afternoon's meeting. George Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 9:34 PM To: Harvilla, George Cc: TOM HOLLIMAN Subject: Pay Request #3 What is the status of pay request #3 as to when a check will be ready? 1 Harvilla, George From: Ralph Roberts [coralph@earthlink.net] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:36 PM To: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.; RALPH ROBERTS Cc: Harvilla, George; TOM HOLLIMAN Subject: RE: S. Highland Sewer, Fontana Thank you Scott, I will keep watch and see their progress. . Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 3:46 PM To: RALPH ROBERTS Cc: George Harvilla; TOM HOLLIMAN; Ralph Roberts Subject: S. Highland Sewer, Fontana The Striping Co. has been contacted by Bryan and told of what is needed. They are to contact us prior to working as well as yourself. We will also notify you once we hear from them. It was requested of them to perform the work this week however, at this time that does not seem likely. 1 Harvilla, George From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 9:30 PM To: torn @assoc-eng.com Cc: Harvilla@pbworld.com Subject: Follow up to request for info prior to meeting I must assume all adjustments you had to the contract price have been forwarded to me as I requested. Scott A. Snyder President - A.D. Gen. Engr. Const. Inc. 1 Change Order#1 Signed Page 1 of 1 Harvilla, George From: Tom Holliman [tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 1:41 PM To: 'Harvilla, George' Subject: RE: Change Order#1 Signed George, Will do. Tom H. Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:54 PM To: 'Tom Holliman' Cc: 'SCOTT SNYDER'; Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org); Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com); 'Ralph Roberts at Home' Subject: Change Order #1 Signed Tom, Ray Bragg from the city has signed Change Order#1 for the 2" overlay. Carla has just faxed it to you. Please include it with Pay Request#3. George 10/17/2002 Harvilla, George From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 2:46 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: FYI George, I need to let you know that I sent to Ralph request's on the 28th Sept. and again the 1st Oct. asking when we can go over quantities for Pay Req #3 . I got no answer back. I cc'd him with it at his home E-mail also. I also called him and had Bryan tell him to call Jodie or myself. I also want to say that Ralph has done an exceptional job for you guys. He is the only one at Assoc. who showed an interest in this project. He is a excellent Inspector, very tough yet fair. I tell you this because I am not looking to get him in to any kind of problems. He is not responsible for this mess, it's comes from his office. I also want you to know why I have to meet with my At tourney, by the way I changed the day to meet him to end of this week since I saw what you where doing, and as long as I get my check by the 25th Oct. Because of this I am being charged late fee's now, which are going to cost me about $2- $3k. That's to much money to just let it go since I have a feeling I'm gonna be in for a battle over C.O. 's One more thing you'll be getting a claim from us from Ayala Boring. They have just sent us the cost totals which is over $17,500.00. Now this is the thing. If you guys reject all or any portion than Ayala may place a stop notice and file suit. My point is if you reject it I do so also. If it goes to court then I take you guy's also. According to Contract Law the job specs supersede any provisions of his agreement with A.D. That doesn't mean he wont try, I really don't know and cant do anything about it. Just wanted to let you know. On a personal level George, what do you think about this stuff with Ayala should it all be rejected and he file a suit? And to interject something. Ralph say's the soil conditions were evident, I say no. You see once we dug down below 3 feet the material became 3-4 times rockier with larger rocks. Like in my E-mail to Assoc I said look at the terrain and you see some top soil and sandy with cobble size rock's but not excessively so. Start digging down and it predominately rocks double & triple the size. Assoc tested to see if the material was different from what we had for open cut and of course the result's were no, same material. This means nothing though since the point is that once dig down 3 ' it change's. No- one can see into the ground to know that. The Rocky conditions are throughout but once down 3 ' . That test should have been to test the upper foot and compare that to what we had at 13 ' -14' deep. The test is meaningless. Please call me asap or jodie about billing, thank you. L01,a u 1 Harvilla, George From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 2:03 PM To: George Harvilla Subject: - Progress Payment#3 •We have-not heard from you so I am figuring that the invoice is OK. Please let me know what is going on with this. It's the middle of October and if Associated would have done there job I'd be getting a check next week. I have vendors and people making threats of stop notices which I never get on jobs. That's what my situation is, I need my money and cannot wait two months without payment. The work is complete and the City owe's me over $250k counting retention and C.O. 's. The overlay was done a month and a half ago. I really worked with you guys on this and need some appreciation shown back by expediting this payment. Like I said if done when it should have been I'd have a check end of this week begin of next. 1 Harviila, George .._.::. From: Harvilla, George Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 10:14 AM To: Scott Snyder(adgenengr@directvinternet.com);Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc- eng.com); Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com); 'Ralph Roberts at Home'; Carlos Navarro (cnavarro@fontana.org); 'aciotti@fontana.org' Cc: Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org); Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org) Subject: Sewer Line Testing Importance: High I just spoke to Carlos regarding final testing of the South Highland Sewer line. Since Scott, Ralph, and I feel the 1000-gallon flush cleaned the line thoroughly, Carlos and I agreed a"balling and flushing"test will not be necessary. Carlos said Anthony Ciotti (350-6684)from the city will attempt to run a video test of the line this Monday, Oct. 14. Anthony, please coordinate with the inspector, Ralph Roberts (cel: 376-0053 or 289-5750). A. D. General does not need to be present for this test. I would like to be present if I'm not in a meeting. My number is 427-9166. This Monday is not a holiday for city staff. George Harvilla Consultant Project Manager Harvilla, George From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 11:42 AM To: TOM HOLLIMAN Cc: Harvilla, George Subject: Your E-mail concerning payment MR. Holliman, What you are saying to me is completely unacceptable. Your E-mail from yesterday is such a fallacy that I will be having council with my attorney concerning it. I will provide him with my numerous E-mails to you and Associated Engineering, to which most you never responded. Maybe you should have read them since they dispel your claims made. Scott A. Snyder 1 Harvilla, George From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 12:11 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: Fontana Sewer Project Mr. Harvilla, I sent you a copy of my reply to Tom's E-mail sent to me yesterday. I am not able to have any dealings with him at this time and will only conduct business with you. This is due from Mr. Hollimans handling of this project. I will have council with my Lawyer next week with the intention to begin the process of filing suit for damages. Prior to this I am willing to speak with you and open to resolving this situation. SCOTT A. SNYDER PRESIDENT A.D. GENERAL ENGINEERING CONST. INC. fil LL l 6' f G � 'S �, / � U/ U s �l rr 11 I . ,f 1 t f (- / /(t. C , 2 f fr' �-�,-�--- • v .� �' Up, G i4„r- G 1 / y s , ;• 1- . w (vc 1 V,`''"cl'�b Harvilla, George From: Tom Holliman [tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 3:47 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: PAY REQUEST#3 Hi George, Looks like our emails are passing in the cyber-night. I can't make a Tuesday or Wednesday morning. I believe that we can handle it with Scott and then brief you on the outcome. The discussion is more about procedure than the value of the work and the amount of extra work. I think we're all in agreement on the extras, we just can't seem to convicne Scott to submit a formal request we can build the change order documents on it for submittal to the City. As I promised we'll work with Scott to help get his paperwork organized so we can close out the work quickly. Thanks, Tom Holliman Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 3:38 PM To: 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. ' ; TOM HOLLIMAN Cc: RALPH ROBERTS; Ralph Roberts Subject: RE: PAY REQUEST #3 Gentlemen, I'm available Tuesday all day. Wednesday morning is OK, but not Wednesday afternoon. George Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 3:29 PM To: TOM HOLLIMAN Cc: Harvilla, George; RALPH ROBERTS; Ralph Roberts Subject: PAY REQUEST #3 You will receive by Fed Express tomorrow morning, Friday 10/11/02, my pay request number three. It will include the Change Order work for the paving overlay's since this was an agreed price, and completed six plus weeks ago. The remaining C.O. 's both add and deduct we must meet to go over them. I received contradicting number's and on different Bid Item numbers from Ralph and yourself. So how about we schedule a meeting for next week, like Tuesday or Wednesday.? I imagine George ought to be there. I sent him a copy of this but will you speak with him about attending.? Thank You, SCOTT A. SNYDER 1 President, A.D. Gen. Engr. Const. Inc. 2 • Harvilla, George From: Tom Holliman [tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 3:44 PM To: 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.' Cc: George Harvilla(E-mail); "Ralph Roberts" Subject: RE: PAY REQUEST#3 Hi Scott, How about late Wednesday afternoon, October 16th, say 3:00 PM. I have to be in Escondido in the morning but I will be back in the office before 3 :00 PM. At that time we can sort out the numbers and determine why there's a difference between my numbers and Ralph's. I suspect it's because I was quoting the numbers only for the purpose of illustrating we've got a number of change orders, but I wasn't trying to state absolute values as Ralph should have. In any event let's get together on Wednesday and sort it all out. I will speak to George about attending. The only thing I can't agree to is payment for the paving overlay in this progress payment. I know the work was done several weeks ago and the price was agreed to in emails, but without an executed change order I can't add the work to the contract and pay you for it. This is why both Ralph and I have been saying that you need to submit the change order request so we can process it. I know that this may cause you a financial hardship but the contract terms bind us to paying only for those items either in the original contract, or added through formal change order. I would like to give on this and help you out, but the contract terms which we have been contracted by the City to enforce are very clear and we would be violating our agreement with the City if we approved and forwarded payment requests which were not in conformance with the terms of the contract. The only thing I can do is help you make sure the Change Order we develop next Wednesday covers everything and can be processed through the City in time to be included in the final progress payment which will be made next month. . I know it's not what you wanted to hear, but given that Ralph and I have brought this up to you and Brian on a number of occasions, I'm at a loss to understand why it's taken so long for you to make the submittal on something that we all have clearly agreed upon and work that you've already done. I will make sure that Ralph and I are at the meeting at our offices on Wednesday, and I'll copy George Harvilla on this email to ask him to attend as well. Thank you, Tom Holliman Associated Engineers Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 3:29 PM To: TOM HOLLIMAN Cc: George Harvilla; RALPH ROBERTS; Ralph Roberts Subject: PAY REQUEST #3 You will receive by Fed Express tomorrow morning, Friday 10/11/02, my pay request number three. It will include the Change Order work for the paving overlay's since this was an agreed price, and completed six plus weeks ago. The remaining C.O. 's both add and deduct we must meet to go over them. I received contradicting number's and on different Bid Item numbers from Ralph and yourself. So how about we schedule a meeting for next week, like Tuesday or Wednesday.? 1 I imagine George ought to be there. I sent him a copy of this but will you speak with him about attending.? Thank You, SCOTT A. SNYDER President, A.D. Gen. Engr. Const. Inc. 2 Harvilla, George From: Tom Holliman [tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 3:36 PM To: 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.' Cc: George Harvilla (E-mail); "Ralph Roberts" Subject: RE: Extra Work- Remove and Replace Irrigation Pipe Scott, In reference to your email, there are several other outstanding change order items which you have yet to submit to the City for approval. These include; 1. Upsizing manhole number 12 from a 48-inch manhole to a 60-inch manhole, with a corresponding reduction in the number of 48-inch manholes. 2. Changes to bid item no. 3 caused by the extension of the casing under Sierra by 5-feet to clear interferring utilities 3 . Changes to bid item no. 6 to 15 feet of pipeline to clear PacBell conduits on the south side of Highland. 4. Changes to bid item no. 5, adding 8 feet of pipe because of the casing extension. 5. Changes to bid item no. 14, additional pavement added to the contract 6. Changes to bid item no. 10, adding one manhole, see entry #1 above. 7. Changes to bid item no. 4, deduction of 2 feet of pipe. I understand from Ralph that copies of these changes and adjustments have been forwarded to you for use in preparing your change order request. In addition to these items we have not recieved a formal request for the addition of the capping of Juniper and Walnut in lieu of the asphalt tonnage shown in the bid schedule for repairing this trench. And finally we have not recieved a formal request to extend the contract from September 15, 2002 to the end of the work to avoid imposition of liquidated damages. The fact that we are aware of the changes does not mean that you don't have to submit requests for the changes on A.D. letterhead with corresponding back-up, per the terms of the contract. I believe Ralph has told you on several occasions that you must request the changes, and a formal change order approved by the City, before you can get paid for the work. So far I haven't seen one formal request, in compliance with the procedures in the green book, for anything. The work on the irrigation pipe was done some time ago, and many of the other items are weeks old. We want to close out the project and file the notice of completion as soon as possible. In order for you to be paid for full amount of the work you must submit any changes to the contract for dollars, quantities, and time. As long as these changes remain outstanding the contract cannot be closed out, the liquidated damages cannot be mitigated, and the City cannot release your bonds or retention. It is in your best interest to expedite your requests for extras and time as soon as possible. If you need assistance in preparing the documents or have any quesions regarding the process please call me at (909) 980-1982. Tom Holliman Associated Engineers Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 11:49 AM To: tomb@assoc-eng.com Cc: Harvilla@pbworld.com; ralphr@assoc-eng.com Subject: Extra Work- Remove and Replace Irrigation Pipe As you know we had extra work on the Juniper involving the Irrigation pipe. As I stated previously in a prior E-mail I needed to get invoiced for the materials, and at this time I am waiting on one or two more from vendors before I will have my cost proposal. SCOTT A. SNYDER 1 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 3:38 PM To: 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.'; TOM HOLLIMAN Cc: RALPH ROBERTS; Ralph Roberts Subject: RE: PAY REQUEST#3 Gentlemen, I'm available Tuesday all day. Wednesday morning is OK, but not Wednesday afternoon. George Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 3:29 PM To: TOM HOLLIMAN Cc: Harvilla, George; RALPH ROBERTS; Ralph Roberts Subject: PAY REQUEST #3 You will receive by Fed Express tomorrow morning, Friday 10/11/02, my pay request number three. It will include the Change Order work for the paving overlay's since this was an agreed price, and completed six plus weeks ago. The remaining C.O. 's both add and deduct we must meet to go over them. I received contradicting number's and on different Bid Item numbers from Ralph and yourself. So how about we schedule a meeting for next week, like Tuesday or Wednesday.? I imagine George ought to be there. I sent him a copy of this but will you speak with him about attending.? Thank You, SCOTT A. SNYDER President, A.D. Gen. Engr. Const. Inc. 1 ;Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 10:14 AM To: Scott Snyder(adgenengr@directvinternet.com);Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc- eng.com); Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com); 'Ralph Roberts at Home'; Carlos Navarro (cnavarro@fontana.org); 'aciotti@fontana.org' Cc: Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org); Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org) Subject: Sewer Line Testing Importance: High I just spoke to Carlos regarding final testing of the South Highland Sewer line. Since Scott, Ralph, and I feel the 1000-gallon flush cleaned the line thoroughly, Carlos and I agreed a"balling and flushing"test will not be necessary. Carlos said Anthony Ciotti (350-6684)from the city will attempt to run a video test of the line this Monday, Oct. 14. Anthony, please coordinate with the inspector, Ralph Roberts (cel: 376-0053 or 289-5750). A. D. General does not need to be present for this test. I would like to be present if I'm not in a meeting. My number is 427-9166. This Monday is not a holiday for city staff. George Harvilla Consultant Project Manager Harvilla, George From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 08,2002 7:58 PM ,�a To: Harvilla, George t ✓ �.� -�r.� tom ' Subject: I Wish To Speak With You L, v� Ce Please give me a call on my mobile phone 818-3 -9700 or at the office if I don't answer. I want to talk about a few things on an offic'al basis since you are the Project Manager and if you don't mind on a personal basis as well. Please do not say anything until I speak with you, but I am submitting my pay request number three, Wednesday, 10/09, and it will not be held up nor made a part of change order negotiations. Whoever is trying to force this upon me is wrong and I will not stand for it. I deserve exactly what I have given to the City and all involved on this project. And George think back to when I called you and you called me just a couple day's after bid opening. You commented way back then on how you liked how I took care of business and my attitude, my promptness, and my ethics. I have not changed. I trust your professionalism and believe you will honor my request to not speak on any of this until I speak with you. I believe you to be an honorable man and I believe you will not be biased in anyway. Let me ask you this. I am wrong in assuming that you as Project Manager/Engr have as part of your duties to sort of arbitrate disputes should they arise between myself and the contracted design engineer? Because after all they are a contractor the same as I, in business to make a profit. So it cannot be that whatever Associated say's is accepted as fact and absolute. If this is how things are tried to be done I will take it to the next level then the next if need be. I have covered my ass regardless of what a ignorant E-mail may imply. Like I said I wont start things but I will sure in the hell finish them. I got where I am for one reason, I am exceptional at what I do. And I am sorry that some of my anger has come out after all. But I also tell you this because I respect you George, that's something very few have with me. And that's why I'm going to give you the chance to do your job and let you know I believe you will. Lastly I want to make it clear that I what I ask for I am entitled to. I don't pad cost's, that's lying and stealing. So what I say is owed to me is, no more no less. Give me what I have given it's that simple. 1 Harvilla, George. . From: Harvilla, George Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 4:09 PM To: Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org); 'Paul Balbach'; 'Carla Pursel'; Carlos Navarro (cnavarro@fontana.org); Yousuf Patanwala (ypatanwala@fontana.org); 'Felipe Molinos'; Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com); 'rsandoval@fontana.org'; 'SCOTT SNYDER'; 'Ralph Roberts at Home'; Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com) Subject: Successful Sewer Test This afternoon, the South Highland Sewer was tested by releasing 1000 gallons of water into the upstream manhole east of Sierra Avenue. The water flowed through the new line to the existing line at the corner of Cypress/Walnut. It took 35 minutes for the water to flow approximately 4700 feet (average velocity of 2.3 ft/sec). The line drops a total of 48 vertical feet. The line has also been tested with air pressure. Both Walnut Avenue and Juniper Avenue have been completely resurfaced, and the gravel shoulders graded to match the new overlay. The only work which remains to be done is minor cleanup and minor restriping. George Harvilla Successful Sewer Test Page 1 of 1 Harvilla, George From: Ralph Roberts Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 9:42 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: Successful Sewer Test Great, ain't it.... ralphi Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 4:09 PM To: Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org); 'Paul Balbach'; 'Carla Pursel'; Carlos Navarro (cnavarro@fontana.org); Yousuf Patanwala (ypatanwala@fontana.org); 'Felipe Molinos'; Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com); 'rsandoval@fontana.org'; 'SCOTT SNYDER'; 'Ralph Roberts at Home'; Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com) Subject: Successful Sewer Test This afternoon,the South Highland Sewer was tested by releasing 1000 gallons of water into the upstream manhole east of Sierra Avenue. The water flowed through the new line to the existing line at the corner of Cypress/Walnut. It took 35 minutes for the water to flow approximately 4700 feet (average velocity of 2.3 ft/sec). The line drops a total of 48 vertical feet. The line has also been tested with air pressure. Both Walnut Avenue and Juniper Avenue have been completely resurfaced, and the gravel shoulders graded to match the new overlay. The only work which remains to be done is minor cleanup and minor restriping. George Harvilla 10/9/2002 Successful Sewer Test Page 1 of 1 Harvilla, George From: Yousuf Patanwala Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 5:09 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: Successful Sewer Test Congratulations! Great Job. Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 4:09 PM To: Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org); 'Paul Balbach'; 'Carla Pursel'; Carlos Navarro (cnavarro@fontana.org); Yousuf Patanwala (ypatanwala@fontana.org); 'Felipe Molinos';Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com); 'rsandoval@fontana.org'; 'SCOTT SNYDER'; 'Ralph Roberts at Home'; Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com) Subject: Successful Sewer Test This afternoon,the South Highland Sewer was tested by releasing 1000 gallons of water into the upstream manhole east of Sierra Avenue. The water flowed through the new line to the existing line at the corner of Cypress/Walnut. It took 35 minutes for the water to flow approximately 4700 feet (average velocity of 2.3 ft/sec). The line drops a total of 48 vertical feet. The line has also been tested with air pressure. Both Walnut Avenue and Juniper Avenue have been completely resurfaced, and the gravel shoulders graded to match the new overlay. The only work which remains to be done is minor cleanup and minor restriping. George Harvilla 10/9/2002 Successful Sewer Test Page 1 of 1 Harvilla, George From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. Sent: Tuesday, October 08,2002 5:52 PM To: Harvilla@pbworld.com Subject: Re: Successful Sewer Test "Harvilla, George" wrote: This afternoon, the South Highland Sewer was tested by releasing 1000 gallons of water into the upstream manhole east of Sierra Avenue. The water flowed through the new line to the existing line at the corner of Cypress/Walnut. It took 35 minutes for the water to flow approximately 4700 feet (average velocity of 2.3 ft/sec). The line drops a total of 48 vertical feet. The line has also been tested with air pressure. Both Walnut Avenue and Juniper Avenue have been completely resurfaced, and the gravel shoulders graded to match the new overlay. The only work which remains to be done is minor cleanup and minor restriping. George Harvilla Thank You for the information and good news. 10/9/2002 ;HarviIIa,George... . .....:. ... ...... .. From: Bretz,Timothy Sent: Wednesday, October 09,2002 10:53 AM To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: Successful Sewer Test Great News!! and no leaks... Original Message From: Harvilla,George Sent: Tuesday,October 08,2002 4:28 PM To: Bretz,Timothy;Agopovich, Bedros Subject: FW: Successful Sewer Test FYI Original Message From: Harvilla, George Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 4:09 PM To: Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org <mailto:rbragg@fontana.org>); 'Paul Balbach'; 'Carla Pursel'; Carlos Navarro (cnavarro@fontana.org <mailto:cnavarro@fontana.orq>); Yousuf Patanwala (ypatanwala@fontana.org <mailto:ypatanwala@fontana.org>); 'Felipe Molinos'; Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com <mailto:tomh(aassoc-eng.com>); 'rsandoval@fontana.org'; 'SCOTT SNYDER'; 'Ralph Roberts at Home'; Ralph Roberts ( ralphr@assoc-eng.com)Subiect<mailto:ralphr(alassoc-eng.com)Subiect>: Successful Sewer Test This afternoon, the South Highland Sewer was tested by releasing 1000 gallons of water into the upstream manhole east of Sierra Avenue. The water flowed through the new line to the existing line at the corner of Cypress/Walnut. It took 35 minutes for the water to flow approximately 4700 feet(average velocity of 2.3 ft/sec). The line drops a total of 48 vertical feet. The line has also been tested with air pressure. Both Walnut Avenue and Juniper Avenue have been completely resurfaced, and the gravel shoulders graded to match the new overlay. The only work which remains to be done is minor cleanup and minor restriping. George Harvilla Successful Sewer Test Page 1 of 1 Harvilla, George From: Paul Balbach [pbalbach @fontana.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 11:35 AM To: 'Harvilla, George' Cc: Ricardo Sandoval; Felipe Molinos; Yousuf Subject: RE: Successful Sewer Test Thanks for the good news. PB Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 9:07 AM To: Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org); Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org); 'Paul Balbach' Subject: FW: Successful Sewer Test FYI Original Message From: Yousuf Patanwala [mailto:ypatanwala@fontana.org] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 5:09 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: Successful Sewer Test Congratulations! Great Job. Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 4:09 PM To: Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org); 'Paul Balbach'; 'Carla Pursel'; Carlos Navarro (cnavarro@fontana.org); Yousuf Patanwala (ypatanwala@fontana.org); 'Felipe Molinos';Tom Holliman (torah@assoc-eng.com); 'randoval@fontana.org'; 'SCOTT SNYDER'; 'Ralph Roberts at Home'; Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com) Subject: Successful Sewer Test This afternoon, the South Highland Sewer was tested by releasing 1000 gallons of water into the upstream manhole east of Sierra Avenue. The water flowed through the new line to the existing line at the corner of Cypress/Walnut. It took 35 minutes for the water to flow approximately 4700 feet (average velocity of 2.3 ft/sec). The line drops a total of 48 vertical feet. The line has also been tested with air pressure. Both Walnut Avenue and Juniper Avenue have been completely resurfaced, and the gravel shoulders graded to match the new overlay. The only work which remains to be done is minor cleanup and minor restriping. George Harvilla 10/9/2002 Successful Sewer Test Page 1 of 1 Harvilla, George From: Ray Bragg [rbragg@fontana.org] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 1:09 To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: Successful Sewer Test Great Work George ! Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 4:09 PM To: Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org); 'Paul Balbach'; 'Carla Pursel'; Carlos Navarro (cnavarro@fontana.org); Yousuf Patanwala (ypatanwala@fontana.org); 'Felipe Molinos'; Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com); 'rsandoval@fontana.org'; 'SCOTT SNYDER'; 'Ralph Roberts at Home'; Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com) Subject: Successful Sewer Test This afternoon,the South Highland Sewer was tested by releasing 1000 gallons of water into the upstream manhole east of Sierra Avenue. The water flowed through the new line to the existing line at the corner of Cypress/Walnut. It took 35 minutes for the water to flow approximately 4700 feet (average velocity of 2.3 ft/sec). The line drops a total of 48 vertical feet. The line has also been tested with air pressure. Both Walnut Avenue and Juniper Avenue have been completely resurfaced, and the gravel shoulders graded to match the new overlay. The only work which remains to be done is minor cleanup and minor restriping. George Harvilla 10/10/2002 Harvilla, George From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:55 AM To: ralphr@assoc-eng.com; ralphr@assoc-eng.com; ralphr@assoc-eng.com Cc: Harvilla@pbworld.com;tomh@assoc-eng.com; Harvilla@pbworld.com; tomh@assoc-eng.com; Harvilla@pbworld.com;tomh@assoc-eng.com Subject: Pay Request- South Highland Sewer Fontana Bryan relayed your message about wanting to meet to discuss the final quantities and such at your office.This is fine but, in order to be prepared we need a copy of what you have before hand. Harvilla, George From: Ralph Roberts [coralph@earthlink.net] Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 8:44 PM To: Harvilla, George;tomh@assoc-eng.com Subject: Fw: Pay Estimate • Original Message From: "Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. " <adgenengr@directvinternet.com> To: <coralph@earthlink.net> Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 11:29 PM Subject: Pay Estimate > Ralph, > How do you want to take care of this payment.? > I imagine it is going to be the last one, with only a final payment of > retention. By the way I want to request to have retention reduce to > five percent for the job. That would mean no rentention would be taken > on this estimate since there is already over five percent being held > now. Since the job will be done in a couple few days I believe my > request is appropriate. > Let me know what you want to do. > SCOTT A. SNYDER 1 Harvilla, George From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Saturday, September 28,2002 11:40 PM To: ralphr@assoc-eng.com Cc: Harvilla@pbworld.com; tomh@assoc-eng.com; coralph@earthlink.net Subject: Fontana South Highland Ave Sewer--Final Inspection Work will be completed Tuesday or Wednesday, 10/01,02/02, this being the case I am requesting a "Final Inspection" . And if any items need to be addressed we will take care of them this week along. SCOTT A. SNYDER 1 Juniper Avenue Paving Page 1 of 2 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 11:28 AM To: 'Carlos Navarro' Cc: Yousuf Patanwala; Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org); 'Carla Pursel'; Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com); 'Ralph Roberts at Home'; Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com) Subject: RE: Juniper Avenue Paving Carlos, Ralph has informed me that in the area near the settlement, the contractor has discovered 3 more leaks. The day this segment of line was put in, the pipelaying crew was literally working just a few feet ahead of the paving subcontractor, and as they say, haste makes waste. Since this area now has to be dug up for the leaks, we are going to insist that a continuous strip be milled out which encompasses the settlement area and the leak areas, and replaced with hot mix asphalt. Hopefully this strip will match relatively well with the overlay cap,since the cap is only a few weeks old. Ralph will convey this to the contractor. George Original Message From: Carlos Navarro [mailto:cnavarro@fontana.org] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 5:51 AM To: 'Harvilla, George' Cc: Yousuf Patanwala Subject: RE: Juniper Avenue Paving Importance: High • George, after receiving your e-mail and a field review of the area in question. I make contact with Ralph and we discussed the settlement area on Juniper just south of Highland. All the documentation on compaction testing meets the specification as called for.l understand that the paving contractor change materials in this area. From B -AR-4000 to Cl-AR-4000, full depth. Both Ralph and I feel this is the reason for the current settlement. First, I would recommend keeping an eye on the area and secondly, I'd placing the contractor on notice, (possible problem in area paved.)the most feasible solution would be to test the area,take some cookies of the pavement, for testing! What do you think, George? Carlos Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 11:05 AM To: Carlos Navarro (cnavarro@fontana.org) Cc: 'Ray Bragg'; 'Carla Pursel' Subject: Juniper Avenue Paving 9/30/2002 Juniper Avenue Paving Page 2 of 2 Importance: High Carlos, As you recall, we had the sewer contractor repave all of Juniper Avenue, not just over the sewer trench. The paving looks very neat and uniform. Ralph Roberts has determined that some settlement has occurred over the trench near South Highland Ave. He feels the settlement varies from 1/2"to 1" over a rectangular area which measures 6'x 75'. It doesn't look that bad to me, and I think the argument could be made to leave it as it is. Could you please look at it and speak to Ralph about it (Ralph's cel: 289-5750). The contractor should be done with the entire project in a week or less, so we need your input soon. Thank you, George Harvilla Consultant Project Manager • 9/30/2002 Harvilla, George From: Scott Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 12:37 PM To: tomh@assoc-eng.com Cc: Harvilla@pbworld.com; ralphr@assoc-eng.com Subject: Re-Time Completion Tom, I agree it being the best interest for all to complete the project as soon as possible, which we are doing. I do have some comments about the contract time. The notice of award was not received by A.D. until June 12, 2002 not June 6. At the preconstruction meeting held Thursday, June 20, 2002, I delivered construction documents, but as you said not all of the documents. What was not yet provided was a city business lic. which was not called out for in the specifications. The insurance documents were given in time since ten days from June 12 gives till the 22nd. Also if you recall in order to help expedite the process we hand delivered some documents to the city on Friday the day after this meeting even though the city was closed for business. This was offered by myself in order to help expedite the start of the project. It was arranged and agreed to by all at the preconstruction meeting. Also at the meeting we were informed that work could not begin until ten days after the City placed an ad in their local paper. The City placed the ad as soon as possible after the preconstruction meeting however, this delayed the start of work two weeks until July 15, 2002. Also there was a delay in starting the work on the borings due from the State Permit needing to be applied for and issued. There was also the delay from the telephone conduit on Walnut Ave. which caused us to skip over this portion while relocation by others was performed. During this relocation A.D. had to install the pipe line in portions at different times. Meaning we had to install this section of pipe a portion at a time on different days, coming back to do some then move off then back again. In summation I believe A.D. has done all possible to expedite the work. I believe you and your staff as well as the Project Manager Mr. George Harvilla and various City personnel involved have all worked towards a timely completion of the project. So I do not believe A.D. can be out of time for completion of work, thus not liable for any liquidated damages. The work is basically complete so let's all be reasonable about the time for completion. Look at the quality of work, the effort put forth, the cooperation given, and much more that I and my personal have provided. In doing so I believe this will speak for itself. Sincerely, SCOTT A. SNYDER A.D. GEN. ENGR. CONST. INC. 1 Harvilla, George From: Scott Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 12:43 PM To: ralphr@assoc-eng.com Cc: Harvilla@pbworld.com; tomh@assoc-eng.com Subject: Additional Footage on Line C Bore There was added footage on Line C Boring as you are aware, I need for you and Bryan to field verify the length. My measurements came to an additional four feet. This was due from moving the bore pit back in order to clear an interfering substructure. This is a seperate issue from the added footage for Line D. Scott A. Snyder 1 Clear Day Page 1 of 2 Harvilla, George From: Tom Holliman [tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:36 PM To: 'Harvilla, George' Subject: RE: Final Inspection for So Highland/Juniper/Walnut George, We will let you know after reviewing the status of the construction. Tom Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:01 PM To: Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com); Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com); 'Ralph Roberts at Home' Subject: FW: Final Inspection for So Highland/Juniper/Walnut Sewer Ralph/Tom, Please let Carla and I know as soon as you feel you can schedule Carlos' inspection. Thanks, George Original Message From: Carla Pursel [mailto:cpursel@fontana.org] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 11:32 AM To: 'George Harvilla @ PB' Cc: 'tomh@assoc-eng.com'; 'ralphr@assoc-eng.com'; Carlos Navarro Subject: Final Inspection for So Highland/Juniper/Walnut Sewer George — As requested, here is the follow-up info to final the construction of the sewer. Before the construction is completed, we will need to notify Carlos Navarro at least three days before the end of construction, so that he can arrange to have one of the inspectors go out with the camera and check the sewer line. After that, he will need to meet with Ralph to go over any comments and/or outstanding issues before approving the construction. Once the sewer is approved by Carlos (Public Works), we will need to schedule an agenda item for council to accept the work as complete to release the bonds. Let me know if you need any assistance in scheduling the inspection with Public Works, or anything else. cp Carla S.Pursel Administrative Project Coordinator CITY OF FONTANA 9/25/2002 � I .Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:38 PM To: Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org); 'Carla Pursel' Subject: FW: Response to request for time of completion FYI Original Message From: Tom Holliman [mailto:tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:35 PM To: 'Scott Snyder' Cc: George Harvilla (E-mail) ; "Ralph Roberts" Subject: Response to request for time of completion Scott, This is in response to A.D. General Construction's request for determination of the time of completion of the South Highland-Juniper-Walnut Sewer project (SP-46-02) . After reviewing the information available to us, we have concluded that A.D. General Construction (A. D. General) is entitled to a three working day extension. When the change order is approved the revised completion date would be September 18, 2002 . To understand how we determined that the three day extension was warranted, please note that per Section 2-1 of the executed contract, "Within ten (10) days after the date of the Notice to Award, the Contractor shall execute and return the following contract documents to the City" . The documents that must be submitted under the requirements of this section include the Contract Agreement, Performance Bonds, Payment Bond, General Liability, Workers Comp, and the Construction Schedule. According to our records the Notice of Award was sent to AD General on June 6, 2002. Based on this date all documentation should have been returned to the City on or before June 16, 2002. The contract documents were not received by the City until June 20, 2002, and did not contain all necessary documentation necessary for the City to approve the documents and issue the Notice to Proceed. Proof of insurance was not received until June. 21, 2002 delaying the processing of the contract and necessary paperwork by five days. After the required documents were received the City delayed the final processing by three days. This accounts for the eight day delay between the required submittal date and the final date of the Notice to Proceed. Because AD General was responsible for five of the eight day delay only three days are justified. The original project end date was September 15, 2002. Adjusting for the three-day City delay, the final end date was September 18, 2002. As of this writing A. D. General is now liable for liquidated damages. However, the City will withhold imposition of those damages as long as work continues in earnest. If AD General begins to reduce the size of the work crews, or begins to move equipment off for another job we will impose the liquidated damages on the next progress payment. We believe it is in the best interest of both AD General and the City to complete this project as quickly as possible and call on AD General to continue to maintain progress. Please keep in mind that it is the responsibility of AD General to identify any delays in the work schedule and notify the owner in writing of these delays so they can be added to the contract before the end of the contract period. In addition it is AD General's responsibility to defend claims for time extensions using the terms of the contract. These include the approved construction schedule with critical paths identified, and the specific conditions of the contract. If you have any questions please contact us at your convenience. 1 Harvilla, George From: Tom Holliman [tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:35 PM To: 'Scott Snyder' Cc: George Harvilla(E-mail); "Ralph Roberts" Subject: Response to request for time of completion Scott, This is in response to A.D. General Construction's request for determination of the time of completion of the South Highland-Juniper-Walnut Sewer project (SP-46-02) . After reviewing the information available to us, we have concluded that A.D. General Construction (A. D. General) is entitled to a three working day extension. When the change order is approved the revised completion date would be September 18, 2002. To understand how we determined that the three day extension was warranted, please note that per Section 2-1 of the executed contract, "Within ten (10) days after the date of the Notice to Award, the Contractor shall execute and return the following contract documents to the City" . The documents that must be submitted under the requirements of this section include the Contract Agreement, Performance Bonds, Payment Bond, General Liability, Workers Comp, and the Construction Schedule. According to our records the Notice of Award was sent to AD General on June 6, 2002. Based on this date all documentation should have been returned to the City on or before June 16, 2002. The contract documents were not received by the City until June 20, 2002, and did not contain all necessary documentation necessary for the City to approve the documents and issue the Notice to Proceed. Proof of insurance was not received until June 21, 2002 delaying the processing of the contract and necessary paperwork by five days. After the required documents were received the City delayed the final processing by three days. This accounts for the eight day delay between the required submittal date and the final date of the Notice to Proceed. Because AD General was responsible for five of the eight day delay only three days are justified. The original project end date was September 15, 2002. Adjusting for the three-day City delay, the final end date was September 18, 2002. As of this writing A. D. General is now liable for liquidated damages. However, the City will withhold imposition of those damages as long as work continues in earnest. If AD General begins to reduce the size of the work crews, or begins to move equipment off for another job we will impose the liquidated damages on the next progress payment. We believe it is in the best interest of both AD General and the City to complete this project as quickly as possible and call on AD General to continue to maintain progress. Please keep in mind that it is the responsibility of AD General to identify any delays in the work schedule and notify the owner in writing of these delays so they can be added to the contract before the end of the contract period. In addition it is AD General's responsibility to defend claims for time extensions using the terms of the contract. These include the approved construction schedule with critical paths identified, and the specific conditions of the contract. If you have any questions please contact us at your convenience. 1 Harvilla, George From: Ralph Roberts [coralph@earthlink.net] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 11:28 PM To: Harvilla, George; Scott Snyder;tomh@assoc-eng.com Subject: Fw: Extra Work on Boring Line D Scott, We needed to add 6 feet to the bore on line "D" , due to the PacBell fiber interfering with the end of the bore. Original Message From: "Ralph Roberts" <ralphr@assoc-eng.com> To: <coralph@earthlink.net> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 11:05 PM Subject: FW: Extra Work on Boring Line D > Original Message > From: Scott Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. > To: ralphr@assoc-eng.com > Cc: Harvilla@pbworld.com; tomh@assoc-eng.com > Sent: 9/24/2002 9:45 AM > Subject: Extra Work on Boring Line D > Ralph, > I need to confirm with you the additional lineal footage on Line D > Bore. Would you please field measure with Bryan and also E-mail me the > length. > Thank you. > Scott A. Snyder > A.D. Gen. Engr. 1 Harvilla, George From: Tom Holliman [tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 8:59 AM To: 'Scott Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.' Cc: Harvilla, George; "Ralph Roberts" Subject: RE: Extra Work on Boring of Line D Scott, Thanks for the note. Ralph informed that there was a conflict and the casing had to be extended. Please make sure that the actual change order request is processed through Ralph and conforms to the conditions of the Green Book so we can process the request quickly. The request must come from AD and would be based on the unit prices contained in the bid documents. Tom Holliman Associated Engineers Original Message From: Scott Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 11:30 AM To: tomh@assoc-eng.com Cc: Harvilla@pbworld.com; ralphr@assoc-eng.com Subject: Extra Work on Boring of Line D Due to a underground utility there will be additional footage for the bore of Line D. 1 Page 1 of 2 Harvilla, George From: Carla Pursel [cpursel@fontana.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 9:21 AM To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: South Highland Sewer-Contract Time George - I'm not totally clear on if any delays were city related. 1 do have on record that we did not receive proof of insurance until 6/21/02, A.D. General did not apply for the construction permit or their business license until 07/10/02. I have a copy of the e-mail in which you responded to them allowing for the change order to complete the overlay G Juniper& Walnut, in which you identified "no additional time will be allowed for these activities". Anything else? cp Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 2:33 PM To: Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org) Subject: FW: South Highland Sewer-Contract Time Carla, When did we get Scott's package? Weren't there some City delays as well? George Original Message From: Tom Holliman [mailto:tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 2:16 PM To: 'Harvilla, George' Cc: "Ralph Roberts" Subject: RE: South Highland Sewer-Contract Time Hi George, Two questions, first-was the NTP delayed because of our delay or because Scott didn't get all of the necessary forms in on time? If we delayed it because of internal processing delays the he gets the days, if his package was incomplete or late,then the time is on him. I don't recall if Scott got his package into Carla within the specified time period or not, if he didn't the time between the original deadline (usually 14 days after award) and the time we recieved the documents is on Scott. In either case Scott has to submit a request for a time extension and explain in his letter why he is entitled to the days. After we get his request we can prepare a proper response. I would happy to respond to Scott if you'll give me the two quick answers I need. Thanks, Tom Holliman Associated Engineers 9/20/2002 Page 2 of 2 Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 11:07 AM To: 'Tom Holliman' Cc: Ralph Roberts at Home (coralph@earthlink.net); Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com) Subject: FW: South Highland Sewer-Contract Time Importance: High Tom, Regarding the first two paragraphs in Scott's e-mail (below), if he feels he needs more time, he should file an official claim and not just send an e-mail, right? Also,we need to calculate this project's time of completion. The original construction schedule was supposed to be from July 1 to Sept 15. The NTP should have been issued on June 19, because the contractor has 10 days after the NTP to begin work. I gave the NTP on June 27, eight days late. The Contractor then had 10 days to begin work. Ralph can tell you exactly when they started. So, I believe, at this point, he only has an additional eight days, or until Sept 23, to finish. Please comment so you or I can respond to Scott. George Original Message From: SCOTT SNYDER[mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Saturday, September 14,2002 8:51 PM To: Harvilla, George Cc: tomh@assoc-eng.com; ralphr@assoc-eng.com Subject: South Highland Sewer-Contract Time Going over E-mails I just now read that no time was given for the A/C overlay work. I think that with traffic set up and shoulder work as well as traffic set up for grinding at joins and gutter out, that for the two streets some time should be given. Also some time needs to allowed for the five working days possibly more in which I had to wait for the state permit to be turned in and received before the boring operation could begin. Please get back with me about this. Also will you let me know what the time for completion is now without any time for the above request? 9/20/2002 Harvilla, George From: Tom Holliman [tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 3:13 PM To: Harvilla, George Cc: "Ralph Roberts" Subject: FW: South Highland Sewer-Contract Time Hi George, I discussed this matter with Ralph this morning so he could understand how a contractor justifies a time extension. As you may recall AD was required to prepare a schedule at the beginning of the job. The purpose of the schedule was to provide a basis for our understanding of how he was going to prosecute the work, and what the critical path was for the job. In order for an element in the schedule to push out the completion date it has to impact the critical path. Any job not on the critical path has "float" in it and therefore can be started later without necessarily affecting the completion date. Since the AC overlay was done while AD was still trenching pipe and installing the casing/laterals this parallel work did not extend the end of the overall job. Therefore no days are warranted for this extra work. As far as the permit was concerned, again unless the critical path start date was impacted this delay it did not affect the end of the job. AD is currently installing manholes, if the casing is complete before the main line and manholes are completed, they did not extend the end of the job and therefore no time extension is justified. As of this email the time for completion is September 15, 2002. AD is currently into the liquidated damages phase of the project and we should notify him of that fact. However, we should also say we will withold impostion of those damages as long as work continues in earnest. If he shortens his crew, or begins to move equipment off for another job we will impose the LD's on his next progress payment. It is the contractor's responsiblity to identify delays and notify the owner in writing of those delays so they can added to the contract before the end of the contract period. Do you want me to press Scott or do you want to verbal inform of this position? Please advise. Tom Holliman Associated Engineers Original Message From: SCOTT SNYDER [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2002 8:51 PM To: Harvilla@pbworld.com Cc: torah@assoc-eng.com; ralphr@assoc-eng.com Subject: South Highland Sewer-Contract Time Going over E-mails I just now read that no time was given for the A/C overlay work. I think that with traffic set up and shoulder work as well as traffic set up for grinding at joins and gutter out, that for the two streets some time should be given. Also some time needs to allowed for the five working days possibly more in which I had to wait for the state permit to be turned in and received before the boring operation could begin. Please get back with me about this. Also will you let me know what the time for completion is now without any time for the above request? 1 Harvilla, George From: Scott Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19,2002 11:30 AM To: tomh@assoc-eng.com Cc: Harvilla@pbworld.com; ralphr@assoc-eng.com Subject: Extra Work on Boring of Line D Due to a underground utility there will be additional footage for the bore of Line D. i� /7 a <_ r»o w�� o Harvilla, George From: Scott Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 6:13 PM To: ralphr@assoc-eng.com Cc: Harvilla, George; tomh@assoc-eng.com Subject: Boring May I please get from you something in writing what we discussed concerning the up sizing of the casing for Line D.That there would be no addition money if Ayala did so. Also about the deny of claim for extra on Line C. Please state how your decision was there was no changed condition and the problem resulted from the manner in which Ayala was working. I am going to have a battle with them and I need your help in this. I feel they thought there would be no questioning over any claim of their's. Like they thought know one knew anything about boring so they could say anything. I'm saving this for latter but he showed he knew exactly what conditions existed by his quote to me. He never gave a price for an 18"casing, instead his quote was using 24". I say that's proof he knew what existed and what he was going to do all along.Would you agree with that? Harvilla, George From: Scott Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 5:57 PM To: Harvilla@pbworld.com Subject: Juniper Paving There is no problem concerning the paving.There billing was incorrect.They are owed a little extra but that is on me, my guy's caused them some delay time nothing big. You know your right about that heat, I think it fry's the brain on some of these guy's.There is one thing I'll never get. It's how some will bury their food wrapped in alum foil under that hot oil smoking asphalt then eat it. How smart is that? And how healthy can that be? Well George that's why they do what they do and why you and I do what we do. We're not better than anyone just a bit more going for us up stairs I think George. Harvilla,George From: Scott Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 4:00 AM To: Harvilla, George Subject: Paving Juniper I'm sorry that I may have gotten to excited over that sq.ft. thing. I'm pretty sure they made a mistake after talking with paver. He's teaching his son's the business and had them do the measuring and paper work. They are good on the machine but not so hot with math and paper work. Kid's, hire them when they are in their teens and early twenty's cause they know it all,just ask them they'll tell you so. I know cause I have two of my own, and they tell me all the time, I know dad, I know what I'm doing, stop worrying. {Ya,that makes me feel a lot better} Harvilla, George From: Tom Holliman [tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 3:04 PM To: Harvilla, George Cc: "Ralph Roberts" Subject: RE: South Highland Sewer-Juniper NC Overlay. Hi George, I'm not sure what to make of the email from Scott. I thought you two had negotiated the cost of the paving at $43K, which we both agreed was generous. My response to Scott would be, why are you telling me this? The deal was struck, if something was missed the deal still stands. If he insists on opening up the deal for this item it would be reasonable for to us to audit all of his actual costs and determine the actual total cost of this extra work. He seems to be inferring he wants $8k on top of the original $43K you agreed to. I think the response is no response. If he wants to request additional funds then he can submit a claim for extras, but I don't know what he's going to base it on. Tom Holliman Associated Engineers Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 8:54 AM To: Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com) ; Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com) ; Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com) Subject: FW: South Highland Sewer- Juniper A/C Overlay. FYI Original Message From: SCOTT SNYDER [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2002 9:09 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: South Highland Sewer- Juniper A/C Overlay. George, I received my billing from the paving machine operator showing a square footage of 47,276 sqft. I will measure this myself on Monday to check totals. But if this is correct than we need to talk about it since you and I based this off of 38,600 sqft. and or 483 tons of A/C. That amount of sq.ft. would add another 108 tons of material to the 483 tons. I dont know what to think at this time it is still kind of shock to me. It could be that they had to go thicker at some areas and he added footage to make up for the tonnage. I shouldn't guess or get to excited yet, but that is a lot more money I was billed for, 8676sqft. , that's over eight thousand five hundred dollars more. I will let you know as soon as I do. Also I will get the tonnage tickets for this. 1 • f .Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:53 PM To: 'Tom Holliman' Subject: RE: Boring of Line D Is Scott going to submit a written request? Does he know that's what he has to do; Original Message From: Tom Holliman [mailto:tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:54 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: Boring of Line D Hi George, Sorry I missed you at the site today. From Scott's emails it would appear that Ayala's offer isn't necessarily A&D's offer. The emails indicate that Mr. Snyder is asserting extra compensation is due for the alledged "extra work" performed during the boring operation. If that's the case he still needs to follow the contract provisions for submitting claims for extra work,and provide the basis for his claim under the terms of the contract. So far I have only seen statements alledging that the the work required something more than "normal and reasonable" . Until we get an actual claim from A&D with dollars and a tie back to the contract provisions we can't really do anything. The contractor is the sole judge as to methods and means to perform the work. As long as the pipe, manholes, and casings get in the ground per the plans, we really can't tell him how to do that, short of some legal violation, which clearly isn't the case here. And since we can't controls his means and methods we can't be reasonable if his means and methods don't work as well as he thought. We have to make it clear we don't have a contract with Ayala and we should not be accepting documents from them. If they want to install 36-inch casing for the same price as the 24-inch, with no time extension for the substitution, that request must come in the form of a written request for A&D. If we approve it we complete a no-cost change order and then they can put it in the ground. Until we get it from A&D we can't do anything to approve the substitution. Tom Holliman Associated Engineers Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:31 PM To: 'Tom Holliman' Subject: FW: Boring of Line D Tom, As you recall, last week I sent an e-mail to Scott (and cc'd you) that the City was fine with the larger pipe. In the Ayala letter which was faxed to me, they were offering to upsize to "a 36-inch casing at the per foot price originally quoted. " George Original Message 1 From: SCOTT SNYDER [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] , Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3 :56 PM To: tomh@assoc-eng.com Cc: Harvilla, George Subject: Boring of Line D I responded to your reply regarding up sizing of the specified bore casing for Line D and I'm waiting a reply. Ayala informed me he is ready for this bore but is on hold due to his concerns of the rocky conditions that may require hand extensive hand work. I reiterate that work specified must be possible to do by within normal and reasonable means by the method specified. As to these conditions being known prior the same must then be said for the Agency and it's representatives. I will say I was on the site several times prior to our work beginning along with my Lead Person Bryan Kier. What is seen is acres of vacant open land. There is top soil all around with abandoned grape vines still growing. Of course we saw sandy conditions along with cobble size rocks but nothing near the extent encountered. Once the top 3-4 feet is excavated the conditions change to extremely sandy and rocky, void of any top soil. The rocks increase in size dramatically from cobble/rip rap size of 6" to two or three times this. Being that I nor Ayala believe the response given prior adequately address the conditions we are encountering. I ask you to reconsider and provide additional direction. SCOTT A. SNYDER A.D. GEN. ENGR. CONST. INC. 2 Harvilla, George From: SCOTT SNYDER [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:53 PM To: Harvilla@pbworld.com Cc: adgenengr@directinternet.com Subject: I need your direction Bryan keeps calling up telling me things he is being told out in the field from Ralph and today Tom was saying things as well. This is getting Bryan very anxious and confusing him. At times its instructions which are changes and or contrary to job plans or instructions from me. I am not directing Bryan to do anything which is not contract work or as case with the overlay an agreed change. And I'm not going around Assoc Engr. I'm trying to politely say of the record first that how this is being handled isn't the proper way. Nothing can be done until written direction is given. I've shown you the kind of person I am throughout this job. I have Bryan do things which we don't have to do and have asked for nothing. I do this for the people living in the city as a good deed as well as for you guy's. This lets you guys say to the City, Hey look what we did/got the contractor to do which was a safety hazard, etc at no cost. Basically I feel I giving something which lets you and Assoc get some atta boy's. I don't do these with strings, all I want is fairness in return when it comes to what's right and what's warranted. I rather not play hard ball George but when that's what I get I'll play. Once made to be this way I become a different person and I'm very good at it. I have to be since it's my livelihood. For example I asked about and will get a copy of the agreements between the city and the parties contracted by them working as the cities rep. This is public information I am entitled to being a tax paying business to Fontana. What I get from this is yet to be seen, but I know what I'm looking for and know when something is there for me to use. I only do what I am made to do. George you are a sensible reasonable person unlike most. When you have work which isn't part of the agreement your company has, you probably do as I, you give some until you just cannot give anymore. Some things just become to much to give and should be acknowledged as more than what's expected. This ought to come without a battle. When you or I gave most other's would have asked for extra, they never give anything. I'm sorry to be so long I'm just bothered from things I am hearing. Also you may not realize how many correspondences I've sent to Assoc which they have never given answers to. Things which are and were matters I could stop working over, yet I haven't. What gets forgotten is specs work both way's. Quite frankly George, Associated has done their job rather poorly to plain bad in areas. They have little knowledge for a job they designed and wrote the spec's for. And now want have their mistakes and lack of effort taken care of at my expense. I see a potential conflict of interest when one contracted company has the means to control or influence what another contracted company is paid for or not. When it is to their benefit to deny whats entitled then this becomes a conflict of interest. What I've asked for I am entitled to. And I have many things which I've brought to the attention of Assoc which looks like it's time I need to follow through with. Like the many hours of delays cost I have. Lets work things out as you and I have done from the start George. We've been able to come to agree on everything thus far to our credit and everyones benefit. Excuse my mistakes please my grammer can use work. 1 Harvilla, George From: SCOTT SNYDER [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:56 PM To: Harvilla@pbworld.com Subject: Re-I need direction I simply want to resolve this boring matters as they should be, between us not from verbal comments made in the field. You are not one I refer to. Scott 1 -- FAX C_ YEARS00 l PARSONS 16689 Foothill Boulevard BRINCKERHOFF Suite 103 Fontana,CA 92335 909-427-9166 Fax:909-427-9169 harvilla©pbworl d com To: - - From: George Harvilla Date: 9_ /6 D Z - _ _ Project No.: Fax No.: f y / _ of / No. of Pages (including this page): 2 Subject: n Comments: L -"? s J 4 cI-4'+�d/f G+-0-‹ 7° •••• • Over a Century of Engineering Excellence RESPONSE REQUESTED THIS IS NOT A LIEN. THIS NOTICE IS GIVEN CALIFORNIA PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 3097 AND 3098, PRELIMINARY CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE. THIS IS NOT NOTICE A REFLECTION ON THE INTEGRITY OF ANY CONTRACTOR OR SUBCONTRACTOR. 7108 1800 8315 9070 3021 H81875 590703 YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT... UNITED RENTALS INC 5595 OWNER or Reputed Owner(on private work) 02 16190 VALLEY BLVD or PUBLIC AGENCY(on public work) FONTANA CA 92335 CITY OF FONTANA 8353 SIERRA AVE FONTANA CA 92385 has furnished or will furnish labor,services,equipment or materials of the following general description: MISC EQUIPMENT RENTAL AND SALES CONSTRUCTION LENDER or Reputed Construction Lender,if any. for the building,structure or other work of improvement located at: NONE/BOND CO: "SEWER IMPROVEMENTS" FIDELITY&DEPOSIT CO WALNUT&JUNIPER 300 SAINT PAUL PL FONTANA CA BAL IIMORE MD 21202 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ORIGINAL CONTRACTOR or 03 Reputed Contractor,if any. An estimate of the total price of the labor,services, A D GENERAL ENG CONST INC equipment or materials furnished or to be furnished is: 2829 N GLENOAKS BLVD $4,500.00 BURBANK CA 91504 Trust Funds to which Supplemental Fringe Benefits are payable: SUB CONTRACTOR/person or firm who contracted for the purchase of such labor,services,equipment or materials is: 818-559-7383 A D GENERAL ENG CONST INC 2829 W GLENOAKS BLVD BY: j2t Agent CA 91504A ent Dated: 08/28/2002 (Signature) (Title) 07/23/2002 R NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNER OTHER INFORMATION,if any. IF BILLS ARE NOT PAID IN FULL FOR THE LABOR, SERVICES, EQUIPMENT, OR MATERIALS FURNISHED OR TO BE FURNISHED,A MECHANIC'S LIEN LEADING TO THE LOSS,THROUGH COURT FORECLOSURE PROCEEDINGS, OF ALL OR PART OR YOUR PROPERTY BEING SO IMPROVED MAY BE PLACED AGAINST THE PROPERTY EVEN THOUGH YOU HAVE PAID YOUR CONTRACTOR IN FULL. YOU MAY WISH TO PROTECT YOURSELF AGAINST THIS CONSEQUENCE BY(1) REQUIRING YOUR CONTRACTOR TO FURNISH A SIGNED RELEASE BY THE PERSON OR FIRM GIVING YOU THIS NOTICE BEFORE MAKING PAYMENT TO YOUR CONTRACTOR OR(2)ANY OTHER METHOD OR DEVICE THAT IS APPROPRIATE UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES. This form prepared by CAPRENOS INC 4345 Murphy Canyon Rd Suite 200,San Diego CA 92123(800)854-2100,FAX(858)560-7626 vie 4 Copyright 2000 by BNI and/or Robert Wilhelm Limited Reproduction for individual use by PBX Members only. BACK SIDE OF FORM 106 - MECHANIC'S LIEN INFORMATION ABOUT MECHANIC'S LIENS INFORMATION REGARDING 20-DAY PRELIMINARY NOTICE • A mechanic's lien must be recorded within 90 days after the A Pre-Requisite For Filing A Mechanic's Lien Except For Contractor Under Direct Contract With Owner. completion of the work of improvement as a whole unless the EXCERPTS FROM SECTION 3097 CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE owner records a notice of completion. If a notice of completion 3097.Preliminary 20-Day Notice(Private work)"means a written notice from a is recorded, the mechanic's lien must be recorded within 30 claimant:that is given prior to the recording of a mechanic's lien and prior to the filing days thereafter unless the claimant is a general contractor or of a Stop Notice,and is required to be given under the following circumstances: specialty contractor,who contracted directlywith the owner,in (a) Except one under direct contract with the owner or one performing actual p Y labor for wages,or an express trust fund described in Section 3111,every person who which case the mechanic's lien must be recorded within 60 furnishes labor,service, equipment or material for which a lien otherwise can be days after the notice of completion was recorded. A claimed under this title,or for which a notice to withhold can otherwise be given under mechanic's lien expires unless a foreclosure suit is filed within this title,must,as a necessary prerequisite to the validity of any claim of lien,and of a notice to withhold,cause to be given to the owner or reputed owner,to the original 90 days after the lien was recorded.The Mechanic's Lien Law contractor,or the reputed contractor,and to the construction lender,if any,or to the is frequently amended. If you have any question as to reputed construction lender,if any,a written preliminary notice as prescribed. procedure,see your attorney. (b) Except the contractor, or one performing actual labor for wages, or an express trust fund described in Section 3111,all persons who have a direct contract RECORDING INFORMATION with the owner and who furnish labor,service,equipment or material for which a lien otherwise can be claimed under this title, or for which a notice to withhold can The mechanic's lien must be recorded in the county where otherwise be given under this title,must,as a necessary prerequisite to the validity of the job is located.This fee should be ascertained by contacting m li , ae , vehe co lenderanyclai,if anyofthis,or toen theand reputedofnotice constructiontowithhold lendercause,if anytoy,be a wrgiittennto prteliminaryonstructi notice the County Recorder. An example of fees charged is for Los as prescribed by this section. Angeles County,where the current fee for recording one page (c) The preliminary notice referred to in subdivisions(a)and(b)shall be given not is $11.00, plus $1.00 for each additional page or fraction later than 20 days after the claimant has first furnished labor,service,equipment or materials to the jobsite,and shall contain the following: thereof. The County Recorder will not record a document A general description of the labor,service,equipment or materials furnished,or unless it is accompanied by the correct fee. to be furnished and if there is a construction lender,he shall be fumished with an estimate of total price thereof in addition to the foregoing. BLANKET LIEN ON SUBDIVISION LOTS The name and address of such person furnishing such labor, service, equipment or materials. If a lien is blanket lien for subdivision or on subdivision lots, The name of the person who contracted for purchase of such labor,service, it should specify the amount of the lien that is allocated to each equipment or materials. lot. A description of the jobsite sufficient for identification. INSTRUCTIONS FOR SIGNING AND VERIFYING THIS FORM Signature:If the claimant of the Stop Notice is a corporation,an officer or managing employee should sign.If the claimant is a partnership,a partner or managing employee should sign.If the firm is a sole proprietorship,whether or not doing business under a fictitious name,the owner of the business or a managing employee should sign.See below for example: CORPORATION SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP(Own Name) Firm Name Firm Name By By Partnership SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP(Own Name) Firm Name Firm Name By By Verification:This is a declaration under penalty of perjury.If it is signed in the State of Califomia,it does not have to be notarized.However,to be valid,the verification must contain the date,the city where signed,and the signature.See below for example. ♦ 1— / 'o 0 W !i ill I1 r t cI31j i I 2 i i, I,. 1 dr !.i a y t f $tt z b ..1 wj gg• i> a E iy I ' i 1 I! 0 - 1 is8 ' $ • it' B 1 $ oa aza tw � B. LL til 9 is IL a ,I4 l!� �,l • a a u.0 g • 11 Pr Vial % E 1 11 W ; It! ; i 1 2I COillAt- • II i 4 1 zei 4 € 1 .iI _ i Harvilla, George From: SCOTT SNYDER [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 12:13 AM To: Harvilla, George Subject: weekend Your right the job will be done soon. I figure seven work days plus a two days for misc stuff & move off. Just like you figured George two weeks or so. Yes, I have another job it's in the city of Commerce for L.A. County Sanitation Dist. It's a sewer main replacement and up size, 3030' of 8" ,10",12" VCP. And the nice thing about is it's not 17.5ft deep, the deepest is 12.5' and most is just under 9' deep. It's at night we work 7pm - 5am for the entire job. This was what the City of Commerce required of the County to get the permit. It's all Industrial at trucks all day with narrow street's. It's a Changed Condition but one I'm glad for. There's a story about that I'll tell you before we finish, I think you'll appreciate it when most others wouldn't be able to get it, or wouldn't see the whole picture. That job is a six week job. And I just picked up a job Thursday, a Force Main Sewer. This one is Cake for a change. Oh ya, I've been calling, I have Jodie and Dustin calling and finally we got someone to do the striping etc. I couldn't get over how flaky companies we're being about Thermal plastic. They all acted as if the stuff was brand new, none of them do it. It's got me thinking of getting into it, I need it on every job anyway. I wont use the two people I've used for year's anymore, that's how bad they've gotten. That's partly why it took a little longer cause I had to find someone new. I hope he does a good job. As you can tell I'm tired cause I am droning on. Talk with you latter but dont let me forget to take you to lunch and to give you an A.D. traveling coffee thermos for your car. I'll give you one for the_wife also. If you dont mind me asking I'm just curious what area you live in and how long. Bye G H 1 Harvilla, George From: SCOTT SNYDER [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 12:14 PM To: Harvilla@pbworld.com Cc: tomh@assoc-eng.com; ralphr@assoc-eng.com Subject: Re-Bore Casing Size Increase I will relay reply to Ayala Boring. I want to make my stance on the matter known. It is the responsibility of the Agency to specify work that can be done. A contractor cannot be expected to perform a task that is not possible to do. If the bore cannot be made using the size casing stated on the plans, than the City will be responsible for any additional cost's. 1 Harvilla, George ..` .: .... . From: Harvilla, George Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 11:24 AM To: 'SCOTT SNYDER' Cc: Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com); Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com); 'Ralph Roberts at Home' Subject: South Highland Avenue Bore Scott, You recently faxed me a copy of a letter written by Ayala Boring,Inc. and addressed to you. Ayala was proposing to increase the size of the bore/casing under South Highland Avenue to 36" at the original price. The larger bore is OK with the City as long as there is not a price adjustment. Sincerely, George Harvilla Consultant Project Manager Harvilla, George From: SCOTT SNYDER [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:56 PM To: tomh@assoc-eng.com Cc: Harvilla, George Subject: Boring of Line D I responded to your reply regarding up sizing of the specified bore casing for Line D and I'm waiting a reply. Ayala informed me he is ready for this bore but is on hold due to his concerns of the rocky conditions that may require hand extensive hand work. I reiterate that work specified must be possible to do by within normal and reasonable means by the method specified. As to these conditions being known prior the same must then be said for the Agency and it's representatives. I will say I was on the site several times prior to our work beginning along with my Lead Person Bryan Kier. What is seen is acres of vacant open land. There is top soil all around with abandoned grape vines still growing. Of course we saw sandy conditions along with cobble size rocks but nothing near the extent encountered. Once the top 3-4 feet is excavated the conditions change to extremely sandy and rocky, void of any top soil. The rocks increase in size dramatically from cobble/rip rap size of 6" to two or three times this. Being that I nor Ayala believe the response given prior adequately address the conditions we are encountering. I ask you to reconsider and provide additional direction. SCOTT A. SNYDER A.D. GEN. ENGR. CONST. INC. 1 -.•. ge 1 oft • r'1 FAX TRANSMITTAL SHE ET State of California State of Nevada State of Ariz is I'1�,rG INC License No 388577 License No. 37410 License No. 11 Dal ��" License No. 11 123 To; Scott Fax Number; I-S 18-559-5502 Company:AA, Gcncral Engineering Construction Date:9/3/2002 From: Ralph G.Ayala, III Fax Number:(909)350-0936 Company;Ayala Boring,Inc, Pages including cover page:2 Subject:Sewer System Improvements SP-46-02,Fontana-DAILY EXTRA WORK REPORT Comments: Enclosed is the Daily Extra Work Report dated 8/29/02_ 10150 Poplar Avenue-Fontana.CA 92335-6395 Phone: (909)350.8940 Fax: (909) 350-0936 E 'd 2OSS—GSS '00000000000000000000 d2T :SO 20 CO daS From;Regina Seiwef (909)35U UKRI 10;bCOli Va\c.e,Ns vwp -. AYALA BORING,INC. 10150 Poplar Avenue,Faun,Colifornia92335 S1BIe ofCpli1tnnialJCCe¢tIva.33277T Wale ofNcvpta..License No.37416 Sala ufAt'izoei11.icenseNo.103031&10,6123 DAILY EXTRA WORN REPORT 5129)2002 PROJECT Nome;$efrer,Warm Improxrcmetde aP40,02 ., LOCATION;Fontana • DESCRIPTION;Nand mining to remove rock obstructions.10.5 hours extra lime TYPE OF UNIT OUANTITY DAY` UNIT PRICE EXTENSION HOURS l LABOR _ FOREMAN ST I 8 $58,03 $ 470.04 FOREMAN OT 1 2.5' , S81,03 $ 204.08 LABORER ST 3 - 0 ,• $40,27 5 968.48 LABORER OT • 3 -2.5 554,73 $ 410.48 $ $ SUBTOTAL s 2j0510. 20%4A-KC-UP '— 5 410.63 TOTAL $ 7 A62.00 EQUIPMENT 14P HYDRAULIC TRUCK CRANE WITH CLAM @UCKETIAUac rlr0 PNYR UNIT 1 8 $75.00 5 000.00 5e-114GN1 HYUKAULIG 11cACK MACHINE i a $55'06 $ adfl 00_ 24-INCH HYDRAULIMOIi(IER 1 1 $110.00 5 110.00 GAS MONITOR 1 1 $75 00 i 75 00, 55p . T 1 $ , $ $ • �• $ S . • .!—, -5 • $ -- 5 - S - ... 5 - S S - S - $ - , • __, = •$ • $ - , SUBTOTAL $ 1,225.00 MATERIAL $ - S - ____ ... - - $ - $ .� .- - 5 - , $ - $ - $ ,, $ - _5 . — SUBTOTAL S - GRAND SUBTOTAL S 1,225.00 15%MARK-UP I _ L I J$ 103.75 TOTAL 5 1408.75 E I . GRAND TOTAL $ 3,1170.75, 2 `4 2055-SSS `00000000000000000000 42TiSO 20 E0 daS ..••....,.viawa umc,a.4J.f Y r'Yi P '2 of 22 10150 Poplar Avenue Fontana,CA 92335 i )1, Tel;(909)350 8940 Fax:(909)350-0936 :^• State of California 'tense No.388577 �r� Slate of Nevada Lice a No.37410 `NG d, State of Arizona License Np.103931 a 106123 September 3,20(12 A.D. General Engineering, Inc. 2829 North Glenoaks Blvd, Suite I06\101 Burbank, CA 91504 Attention: Scott. Reference_ Sewer System Improvements SP-46-02 Fontana Subject: Memo#1 Gentlemen; Please be advised, we strongly recommend against installing a 24..inch casing at the Highland bore crossing. After encountering extreme rocky conditions at the Sierra crossing we expect the same soil conditions at the Highland crossing. If there is a need to hand mine it will cost significantly more hand mining a 24-inch easing due to limited workspace, We recommend a 36-inch casing at the per foot price originally quoted. If you have any questions please feel free to contact our office at 909-350-8940, Sincerely, Ayala Boring,Inc. Ralph G. Ayala, Ill Vice President .17 '4 ZOSS—SSS -00000000000000000000 dZT :SD ZO co daS kD.General Engineering Construction Inc, 2E329 N,Gen Bhd.Sta 108/101 • Burharlr,Ca 91504 Pra (818)556,- 383 t Fax(818)559.5502 FAX.CQ\ F SHEET DATE ( �-)-�-; rJ RECIPIENT -a) a-\\(Lidfibj FA.X 11 jrlaj. -, 1 C� PHONE ,4 ( ) COMPANY C (e.J 5 A.D.GENERAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INC, SENDER C'604 (�. f Jay-- FAX ( 818 ) 559 •5502 PHONE # ( 818 ) 559"7383 MESSAGE d ,tt -a _ � ( 'f �,t L' E)1/7 (stkr• 0-6 L. • 1.4..0 •nr, 01,(' NUMBER OF PACES (W/COVER SHEET) _ I 'd 2OSS-6SS '00000000000000000000 dZT =SO ZO EO daS FAX YEARS _ .__. _.. PARSONS 16689 Foothill Boulevard BRINCKERHOFF Suite 103 Fontana,CA 92335 909-427-9166 Fax:909-427-9169 harvilla@pbworld.com To: 7-;,„ From: George Harvilla /'/v// ,rr,4, Date: �.- y-b z Project No.: Fax No..: CJ �_ 0/9/ No. of Pages (including this page): [f Subject: / r�17 Comments: Over a Century of Engineering Excellence RESPONSE REQUESTED 5ep •r03 02 12. 29p 00000000000000000000. 559-5502 p. 2 -rrum,Re9Ih, (909)350-0936 T4:Sc641 Data:8r29/2002 lime:4:09:10 PM Poe 2 of 2 10150 Poplar Avenue Fontana,C' 92335 • •A 71 Tel;(909)350-8940 Fax: 909' 3S 0-0936 Slate of C;tlifurnia Licerae Ni.1 388577 !f, ; C • -. Staff of Nevada License No.17410 �- +~ State of.43icona License No.103981.54 106123 August 29,2002 A...D.General Engineering, Inc. 2829 North Glettoaks Blvd, Suite 106\101 Burbank, CA 91504 Altctttion: Scott Reference_ Sewer System Improvements SP-46-02 Fontana Subject: NOTICE OF CLAIM Gentlemen: We ate hereby submitting a Notice of Claim on the above referenced project due to 3xtreme rocky soil conditions.After jacking 80' x 36"casing it is not possible to control ;ine and grade due to the volume of rock. The auger cannot cut through the rocks to excavate the appropriate path for the casing. 'We mum hand mine a portion of the casing n order to install it on designed line and grade. The crew darted hand mining this norning. In additional cost for hand mining to remove rock will be forwarded to your office. If 'ou have any questions please feel free to contact our office at 909-350-8940. • ,incetely, ►gala Boring, Inc. alph G. Ayala,III ice President Sep 133 02 12: 29p 00000000000000000000. 559-5502 p- 1 „eyiu over am)3S U936 To.Scott bate,8/29/2002 Time:4A9:10 PM Page 1 of 2 • LD.General Engineering Construction Inc, .4, ? 29 N.Glenoekb Blvd,Sin 1ff101 • gutter*,CA 91S&4 Phcne(81 B)55 _7383♦ Fax(81(5)559.S.,C12 FA COVER SHEET ! r , DATE RECIPIENT [.(, , C %ft //d FAX ( ) _76cr- , Cl; 2_. .. P4ONEN ( ) COMPANY A,D.GENERAL ENG(NEERJNG CONSTRUCTION INC. SENDERT FAX ( 818) 559 .5502 PHONE N ( 818 ) 559- 7383 MESSAGE 7/2 St-i4) :.C &.0 - (0 , (ii. .4t • NUMBER OF PAGES (W/COVER S1-1EET) ""� RE: Fontana Page 1 of 2 liarvilia, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 12:09 To: Christians, Robin Cc: Bretz, Timothy Subject: RE: Fontana Robin, I think a photo gallery is a fine idea, but this will probably take weeks or months to work out. My objective is to get four pictures online as quickly and as inexpensively as possible. The construction of the South Highland Sewer is underway and will be complete in about three weeks. I'd like to get the construction photos up while it's still under construction !! I don't think we anything elaborate, perhaps just a button on the South Highland Sewer web page that says "See Construction Photos". After clicking the link, the four could appear as thumbnails, then clicking the thumbnail would display the photo at full size. I think HTMUJPG would be just fine—why bother with PDF? I also got your e-mail from "Tell a Friend...". It opened my browser and attempted to connect to 209.132.35.246. Then I got the message "Page cannot be displayed ". George Original Message From: Christians, Robin Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 5:24 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: Fontana George, I don't really have "questions". In fact, I wasn't aware of these photos until reading Tim's email today....so, I contacted Jack and asked for an explanation. Jack's reply was: "I posted some project photos to project solve last week, but did not notify you because we have not yet decided how you were going to post them, as a PDF file or a JPG. I was in visioning a kind of a JPG slide show control, that will allow you to flip though the photos. I also wanted to get some pictures from other projects as well. I am not sure this with in your budget. If it is going to exhaust your remaining budget to develop a web page for photos, then we might want to let the city know we need more monies, and get their approval before we proceed." I suggested we create a photo gallery, but it would help to understand the extent of the contents of this gallery before we design something. I also need to confirm Company 39 has sufficient budget to proceed, and if not, coordinate with Tim on new funding. Robin Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.coml Sent:Wednesday, September 04, 2002 5:58 PM To: Christians, Robin Subject: RE: Fontana 9/16/2002 RE: Fontana Page 2 of 2 Robin, What are your questions about how to post the construction photos? 1 George Original Message From: Christians, Robin Sent:Wednesday, September 04, 2002 4:52 PM To: Bretz,Timothy Cc: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: Fontana Tim, None of the links in Related Web links were hooked up to their respective URLs....we'll get that fixed tomorrow. I missed that in my QA of the website. I don't know why you'd have problems with the Email a Friend. It appears to be working correctly. I'm going to send test emails tonight to you and George to see if they get through. I've been in touch with Jack about the South Highland Sewer project photos. He was holding off on notifying me until a decision could be reached on how to post the photos. He also mentioned concern about budget to make this particular enhancement. I believe we have sufficient budget to make a few additional modifications. I recall you mentioned there would be additional funding for the website in the next fiscal year budget. I don't recall if the "ball is in my court"....do you need a scope of work and cost estimate? Or, can I just send you another Notice To Proceed Authorization form? I don't recall what the funding amount was.... Regards, Robin Original Message From: Bretz, Timothy [mailto:BretzT@pbworld.com <mailto:BretzT@pbworld.com> Sent:Wednesday, September 04, 2002 5:21 PM To: 'robin.christians@company39.com' Cc: Harvilla, George Subject: Fontana Robin, George Harvilla (PB) has indicated to me that he can't get the link from the RWW website to Caltrans to work.Also, he can't get the email the site to a friend to work. Any Ideas? George gave Jack some photos of the construction of the South Highland Sewer project to be posted on the RWW site.Jack said he sent them to you.When will they appear on the site? Let me know, Thanks, Tim 9/16/2002 Harvilla, George From: SCOTT SNYDER [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Sunday, September 01, 2002 7:32 PM To: Harvilla, George Cc: tomh@assoc-eng.com; ralphr@assoc-eng.com Subject: Boring of Line- D Ayala has expressed concern about boring Line D using the 24"casing. Since the conditions they encountered on Line C has been so rocky, Ralph Ayala has said he suggest going up in size to 30"- 36" . No formal request or cost proposal has been made by Ayala at this time, I will ask on Tuesday for his decision. Scott Snyder 1 Harvilla, George From: SCOTT SNYDER [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Sunday, September 01, 2002 7:17 PM To: Harvilla, George Cc: tomh@assoc-eng.com; ralphr@assoc-eng.com Subject: Boring Jodie faxed you a copy of Ayala's letter which states they are making a claim due to the amount of rock's. This necessitated hand work for a portion of the bore on Line C. While boring the rocky condition caused the direction of the bore to kick downward. This had to be corrected by hand which increases their cost's for the bore. They state that in order to bore there must be allowable conditions, which I have to agree with. If you have any questions please call me. Thank you, Scott A. Snyder A.D. Gen. Engr. Const. Inc. 1 Harvilla,George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 1:56 PM To: Scott Snyder(E-mail) Cc: Carla Pursel (E-mail); Tom Holliman (E-mail); Ralph Roberts (E-mail); Ralph Roberts at Home (E-mail) Subject: August Invoice Scott, Ralph,Tom, and I are all in agreement with your August invoice. It has been forwarded to the City for processing. Carla will shepherd it through the City as quickly as possible. Happy Labor Day. George Harvilla, George From: Tom Holliman [tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 11:53 AM To: 'Harvilla, George' Subject: RE: Construction Water- S. Highland Ave. Sewer • George, I will have to research the green book for a changed condition section that addresses this issue. It is not the responsiblity of the City to make sure that the contractor's actual costs are consistent with what he assumed when he bid the project. If that were the case then whenever a claim is made for extra costs we should be able to obtain a credit if his actual costs were less than he assumed when he bid the job. I don't think contractors would agree with the later condition. Extra costs can only be paid if the conditions encountered either differed from what in the plans and specs. or could not be reasonably forseen during the bidding phase. I need more informaton than "it's more than I've paid before" . Tom Holliman Associated Engineers Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 10:27 AM To: Tom Holliman (E-mail) Subject: RE: Construction Water- S. Highland Ave. Sewer Tom, What's your opinion on this? George Original Message From: SCOTT SNYDER [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:12 PM To: Harvilla, George Cc: torch@assoc-eng.com Subject: Construction Water- S. Highland Ave. Sewer I just received the bill for construction water, its five/six times more than I've ever had. Due to the conditions encountered we must get the moisture content around 14 percent for it to be around optimum of 7 percent when tested the very next day, less than 24hrs. The material has turned out to be so granular, practically void of any fine's or silt's. What little there is gets washed away from the volume of water it's taking to obtain passing compaction test's. This also has caused more time spent on jetting than normal. I will be seeking additional money for the water and labor. The water bill thus far is $1, 000.00 with 80+ % of the pipe installed. The labor is one laborer for 1.25hrs. for each day of piping installation. Once the piping is complete I'll submit my claim with the totals. But my estimate is $1,300 for labor, $1,100-$1,300 for water. 1 Scott A. Snyder A.D. Gen. Engr. Const. Inc. • • RE: Private Page 1 of 2 r Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Friday,August 30, 2002 10:09 AM To: Paul Balbach; 'Carla Pursel' Subject: RE: Private Paul/Carla, I think Scott was just mad at Associated the day he requested the contract. He hasn't raised the issue since. Besides, the job will be over in less than a month. Let's let this die quietly unless he makes another request. George Original Message From: Carla Pursel [mailto:cpursel@fontana.org] Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 8:52 AM To: Harvilla, George Cc: Paul Balbach Subject: RE: Private George: We have the original contract and the Amendment that identifies that they(Associated)will be the managing party of the construction/soils/etc. Which do you think they would want or do you just want me to provide them both?? OR----I could call Scott and ask him what he looking for to find out what he's needing the contract for. . . . Hmmmm.. . . .which would you prefer? cp Original Message From:Paul Balbach Sent:Friday,August 30,2002 8:36 AM To: 'Harvilla,George' Cc:Carla Pursel Subject:RE:Private George, Sorry for the delay in responding to this. The contract is a matter of public record. Carla can get you a copy. Is there a dispute over some tasks in the scope? Paul Balbach 8/30/2002 RE: Private Page 2 of 2 Original Message From:Harvilla,George[mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent:Wednesday,August 21,2002 1:50 PM To: Paul Balbach' Subject:FW:Private Paul, Now Scott Snyder from A.D.General wants a copy of the City's contract with Associated. I don't know what he's up to. Is this indeed a public document that can be released? George Original Message From:SCOTT SNYDER[mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent:Wednesday,August 21,2002 11:55 AM To:Harvilla,George Subject:Private George, I wanted to know how and where I could get a copy of the contract specifications between the City and Associated Engr.This is all public records and available. Also any word on getting my check tomorrow at City Hall.? 8/30/2002 Harvilla, George From: SCOTT SNYDER [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Thursday,August 29, 2002 10:12 PM To: Harvilla, George Cc: tomh@assoc-eng.com Subject: Construction Water-S. Highland Ave. Sewer I just received the bill for construction water, its five/six times more than I've ever had. Due to the conditions encountered we must get the moisture content around 14 percent for it to be around optimum of 7 percent when tested the very next day, less than 24hrs. The material has turned out to be so granular, practically void of any fine's or silt's.What little there is gets washed away from the volume of water it's taking to obtain passing compaction test's.This also has caused more time spent on jetting than normal. I will be seeking additional money for the water and labor.The water bill thus far is$1,000.00 with 80+%of the pipe installed.The labor is one laborer for 1.25hrs. for each day of piping installation. Once the piping is complete I'll submit my claim with the totals. But my estimate is$1,300 for labor, $1,100-$1,300 for water. Scott A. Snyder A.D. Gen. Engr. Const. Inc. HarvHlla George From: SCOTT SNYDER [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:18 PM To: Harvilla@pbworld.com Cc: tomh@assoc-eng.com Subject: Interfering Irrigation Pipe- S. Highland Ave Sewer Once I get all the billing invoices I will have the cost with break down for your review.This is for the Irrigation Line encountered while installing Line B. The work was completed today. Scott A. Snyder Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:29 AM To: 'Tom Holliman'; Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com); 'Ralph Roberts at Home' Subject: FW:-Boring FYI FYI Original Message From: SCOTT SNYDER [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 8:49 PM To: Harvilla@pbworld.com Subject: Boring I had Bryan check on the boring this afternoon, Ayala had in aprox 64'- 65 ' of casing. I had him measure from end of bore pit to begining of street pavement, it's 66'- 67' . So they are just now getting to street pavement which scales out to 70' wide per plans. And remember the pit was moved 4' back. Also I was wrong the receiving pit has not been excavated. I had forgotten we did not dig it out yet for safety reasons and, to concentrate on having everything done for School Opening. We can have it dug and shored in half a day or so. 1 Harvilla, George. From: Harvilla, George Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 4:40 PM To: 'SCOTT SNYDER' Subject: RE: Pay#2 Scott, I appreciate what you're saying. I work for Parsons Brinckerhoff and many times it takes several months to get paid after submitting an invoice. The difference is PB is a large company and can absorb cash flow problems better than a small company can. George Original Message From: SCOTT SNYDER [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:29 AM To: Harvilla@pbworld.com Subject: Pay #2 Thanks for the info George. And thanks for trying. You know most Agencies pay bi-weekly. So once in a while I end up asking people, how many weeks would they keep coming to work without getting that check? I answer for them saying none, in fact if its a day late they all get irate about it. Then I ask, why do you think its OK to make me wait weeks or months for my check? My family needs to eat, pay or bills same as everyone else, I'm no different then they are I live from check to check to. George, this was not meant for you at all. You have earnestly tried to speed things along in all aspects, I commend you for this. I just letting you know the only rich contractors are the one's who's dad or grandpa started the business. One's like myself live a life of always waiting on a check. For example I just got my retention check two weeks ago for a job that was completed ten months ago. The Pomona jobs, my pay req #3 was turned in six weeks ago and I'm told its still ten day's away. Same for the tiny 20k job I finished in nine weeks ago, still waiting for my check. This is in addition to retention monies still held and c.o. money. All the work is in and being used by them/ these agencies yet the contractor has to wait and carry the burden. I would like to have the money I pay out in late charges for materials and all it takes to do the job. Plus always pay my guy's, they come first. I'll tell you another thing honest people like Jodie and I are up against. I changed some personal for this job. They all are experienced having worked for one or two of the Croatian or Yugoslavia's contractors. Jodie has them fill out a application for important info needed. On this app it ask for work history and rate of pay. These Co's all do prevail wage jobs only like I do but, the pay these men got per hour was $16, $19, $18.50. That's what was on their app's. I pay prevail wage which varies from $29hr to $34hr. for these three. That's what I have to compete against and that's why I cant keep giving time, resources, etc. a little here and there quickly turns into thousands. With Insurance's, overhead, equip pymnts, fuel, labor but not materials, it cost's around $850-$950 PER HOUR! ! Cost only no profit is in that. So like with the telephone in the way we had almost a two hour delay just that day. We had to skip over then go back to it, remove and reinstall their shoring because it was collapasing on itself before we could do our skipped over portion. All taking more time. Plus this skipped over work takes 4.5hrs to five hours instead of one and a half. It 1 1 throws everything out of sync and slows done the work for a day or two. Add it all up and the actual time this telephone cost me is six to nine/ten hours. Times this by $850 per hour= $5,100-$8,500. The same for that water pipe on Juniper, and a couple other times we had delays. By the way we informed Ralph at these occurrences that we were on delay or of the changed condition to which we got the typical reply from people, he said, "what delay? what change?" Many Contractors put in claims non-stop and over anything. More and more I see why. Sorry to go on as I did. I enjoy talking with you and respect your work ethic very much. I guess that's why I tell you things I've never told to other's. Your a good man George, priceless to your employer I guarantee you of that. Please keep this off the record, between us only. And had I known my asking for the paving work to be on this request was gonna be such an issue for some I may not have asked. Yet it never hurts to ask. I'm gonna write your company when we're done here to let them know what kind of value they have with you and all you give to your job. Your like Bryan one in a million. Talk with you later George. 2 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 2:41 PM To: Scott Snyder(adgenengr@directvinternet.com) Cc: 'Tom Holliman'; Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com); Ralph Roberts at Home (coraiph @ earthlink.net) Subject: FW: Change Order Work Scott, FYI. Original Message From: Tom Holliman [mailto:tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 2:43 PM To: 'Harvilla, George' Cc: "Ralph Roberts" Subject: RE: Change Order Work George, You're right, unless the change order work was approved and the change order work was completed before the end of the month even though it would be finished only a few days into the next month it cannot be included in the August pay estimate. Tom Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 3:38 PM To: 'Tom Holliman' Cc: Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com) ; Ralph Roberts at Home (coralph@earthlink.net) Subject: FW: Change Order Work Tom, I don't believe the City can pay for work which has not been completed??? A possible solution would be to prepare the invoice and include the Juniper Pavement, submit it to me, and I would wait until Sept. 4 to forward the invoice to City Finance. Let me know what you think. George Original Message From: SCOTT SNYDER [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 2:48 PM To: Harvilla, George; Harvilla, George; Harvilla, George Cc: tomh@assoc-eng.com; ralphr@assoc-eng.com Subject: Change Order Work I'm asking if pay request #2 may include the C.O. work which will be done Tuesday, Sept. 3rd. I am suppose to go over quantities with Ralph on Thursday according to Specs. However with the City closed Friday and Monday a Holiday I ask this work be included in this request. Otherwise it will be about two months before I receive payment for the work under req #3 . Thank you for considering this. 1 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Tuesday, August 27,2002 10:04 AM To: 'SCOTT SNYDER' Subject: RE: Paving Juniper Thanks. Original Message From: SCOTT SNYDER [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 1:39 AM To: Harvilla, George Cc: tomh@assoc-eng.com; ralphr@assoc-eng.com Subject: Paving Juniper I spoke with Bryan about leveling along the shoulders of the paving he will take care of this. 1 Harvilla, George From: SCOTT SNYDER [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 9:17 AM To: tomh@assoc-eng.com; tomh@assoc-eng.com Cc: Harvilla, George; ralphr@assoc-eng.com; Harvilla, George; ralphr@assoc-eng.com Subject: Boring--S. Highland Ave. Sewer Ayala will be on site Friday, August 23rd. The first bore will be on Line C, between M.H. 's #12 & #13. There will be an OSHA Inspector on site during the two bore's. Please remind your personnel who visit the site to wear their hard hats and traffic vest's. Also, please be very cautious when by the bore pits, trenches and trenching operations. Be aware of moving machinery, equipment & overhead lifting. At excavations and trenches keep a safe distance from the edge. Shoring and Guard Rails are in place but the soil is of unstable nature and the ground is uneven. Thank You for your observance and cooperation. SCOTT A. SNYDER A.D. GEN. ENGR. 1 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Monday, August 26,2002 3:34 PM To: 'SCOTT SNYDER' Cc: 'Tom Holliman'; Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com); Ralph Roberts at Home (coralph @ earth link.net) Subject: RE: Paving Juniper Ave Scott, Besides the pavement markings on Walnut, I believe the shoulders still need to be graded to match the 2" overlay. George Original Message From: SCOTT SNYDER [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 2:28 PM To: Harvilla, George Cc: tomh@assoc-eng.com; ralphr@assoc-eng.com Subject: Paving Juniper Ave We are working on the M.H. 's, laterals, and base paving of trench on Juniper. This will allow for overlay paving to take place on Tuesday, September 3rd. The crew and I will work this Friday for paving to be completed prior to School starting. George .I've been trying to find someone to place the limit line and Stop down like you requested. Will continue to do so to have in a.s.a.p. Scott A. Snyder A.D. Gen. Engr. Const. Inc. 1 Harvilla Geor e From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 12:24 PM To: Scott Snyder(adgenengr@directvinternet.com) Cc: Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com); Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com); Ralph Roberts at Home (coralph@earthlink.net); 'Paul Balbach; caaron@fontana.org'; 'sbangle@fontana.org'; Carla Purse! (cpursel@fontana.org); 'Ray Bragg' Subject: Juniper and Walnut Avenue Paving Construction Change Order Scott, Per our phone conversation today, please provide additional paving on Walnut Street and Juniper Avenue for the lump sum amount of$42,150, as broken out below: Walnut Street Provide a 2"overlay on Walnut Street(paving essentially complete—some minor items remaining). The asphalt cost will come from Bid Item 14,Asphalt Concrete Pavement. Compensation in the amount of$7,250 will be granted for the different paving method which was employed (complete overlay vs. trench paving). Juniper Avenue After the sewer under Juniper Avenue has been completed and tested, please proceed with a 2" overlay over the entire width of Juniper Avenue from Walnut Street to South Highland Avenue. This includes the intersection of Walnut/Juniper. Compensation shall be in the amount of$34,900 for the following items: -Cold planing -Sweep street -Tack coat -2"overlay cap (AR 4000) over entire roadway surface -Additional traffic control - Pavement markings -Grade shoulder to match new pavement surface The asphalt required over the trench to bring the surface back to its pre-construction level will be paid from Bid Item 14. No additional time will be allowed for these activities. Sincerely, George Harvilla Consultant Project Manager Harv�la,George. From: Harvilla, George Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 3:25 PM To: Scott Snyder(adgenengr@directvinternet.com) Cc: 'Tom Holliman'; Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com); 'Ralph Roberts at Home' Subject: Juniper Estimate Scott, In order to get additional funds approved for the overlay of Juniper, I need your cost proposal broken down by item. You submitted an estimate of$45,220. Can you please break this amount into the following items? Add items which I may have overlooked. These categories will not be used for payment purposes and are for information only. ,wo , 71 21-1rr Cold Planing $ ?D��v Sweep Street$7S-6 Tack Coat$ 2l�'� ��o� � wrfiA � f� fi 2 Overlay$ y% 1(/ /'Jc G�`"C'C cf // 6 Additional Traffic Control$ � r�f A O lam-- A- V Pavement Markings$ J9_0 '/ /3 eS Grade Shoulder to Match New Pavement Surface$ Total$ ? 1 q O las] F lti �--�� • (4 P, 4-1Z/lS a I Pagel of2 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Wednesday,August 21, 2002 1:46 PM To: Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com) Cc: Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com); Ralph Roberts at Home Subject: FW: Overlay of Juniper Tom, As you can see from Scott's message below, he feels Bid Item 14, Asphalt Concrete Pavement,would not cover the costs of doing an overlay. Did the plans or specs designate actual overlays for Walnut or Juniper? If not, I can see that his price would be based on just placing the asphalt over the trench. Scott has submitted an estimate of$45,220 for overlaying Juniper. I estimate the overlay would take 6570 cf of asphalt. The cost of the asphalt alone (based on his bid of$37/ton)would then be: 6570 cf x Ibfcf x 1 ton/2000 lb x$37/ton=$15,800 $45,220—15,800=$29,420. So, according to Scott,the additional cost of the paving machine, rolling,testing, striping, planing and other incidentals would cost$29,420. Do you feel this is reasonable? And if we pay the$45,220, we obviously would not be paying the full price of Bid Item 14, which according to Scott is only for the trench overlay, right? Please review this and get back to me so we can get some resolution on this. George Original Message From: SCOTT SNYDER [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent:Wednesday, August 21, 2002 12:26 AM To: Harvilla, George Subject: Overlay of Juniper. George, I just realized Ralph believes the extra tonnage of A/C on this job, B.I.#14, more than covers an overlay on Juniper. It does tonage wise but trench resurfacing is different from placing a new overlay. There's a good bit of additional work to overlay as well as cost's. The fact is at the unit price wont cover the cost. For Juniper if overlayed and that tonage value is use to pay me, I am losing money. Over ten thousand dollars will come out of my pocket,which I cannot afford. Plus it just is not right. I lost money doing Walnut's overlay but said nothing. Plus George it's just not right. lye worked with the 8/21/2002 Page 2 of 2 City from the start always trying to assist and please. But I need speak up for this one. You see George these plans have a ton of shit on them the problem is most of it doesnt show any real information.The info it has is confusing, often contradicting itself, and down right in adequate. Especially trying to use as how the overlay is to be built. Niether plans or specs address anything about overlays. Here's more I just thought of I have to do but wouldnt with trench resurfacing only. Like I sweep the whole street to remove dirt,trash,etc,making several passes with our sweeper. Then Sray the entire existing surface with ss1 h tack emmulsion.This cost$2k itself.Then instead of a half day billing for the paving machine to cap my trench, it's a full day plus overtime charges to overlay. I had to grind down exist A.C.for joining, another$1250.00-$1500.00. I could go on for awhile as more keeps coming to mind,it has me thinking that$10K I mentioned is low. Besides purposely overloading a bid item is against the law.This isnt permitted for reason's just like this. The more I think of this has me now saying I would have to protest doing an overlay using B.I.14 as basis to pay me. Also the price given by me is a very good price and fair. On my Lake Arrowhead job for the city the square footage price was$3.00 per square foot. Hopefully I was successful)showing my points, if not there's much much more to go over. Hope to hear from you soon. SINCERELY, SCOTT A. SNYDER A.D. GEN. ENGR. CONST. INC, 8/21/2002 Original Message From: SCOTT SNYDER [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 12:26 AM To: Harvilla, George Subject: Overlay of Juniper. Geroge, I just realized Ralph believes the extra tonnage of A/C on this job, B.I.#14, more than covers an overlay on Juniper. It does tonage wise but trench resurfacing is different from placing a new overlay. There's a good bit of additional work to overlay as well as cost's. The fact is at the unit price wont cover the cost. For Juniper if overlayed and that tonage value is use to pay me, I am losing money. Over ten thousand dollars will come out of my pocket, which I cannot afford. Plus it just is not right. I lost money doing Walnut's overlay but said nothing. Plus George it's just not right. Ive worked with the City from the start always trying to assist and please. But I need speak up for this one. You see George these plans have a ton of shit on them the problem is most of it doesnt show any real information.The info it has is confusing, often contradicting itself, and down right in adequate. Especially trying to use as how the overlay is to be built. Niether plans or specs address anything about overlays. Here's more I just thought of I have to do but wouldnt with trench resurfacing only. Like I sweep the whole street to remove dirt,trash,etc,making several passes with our sweeper. Then Sray the entire existing surface with sslh tack emmulsion. This cost $2k itself.Then instead of a half day billing for the paving machine to cap my trench, it's a full day plus overtime charges to overlay. I had to grind down exist A.C. for joining, another $1250.00-$1500.00. I could go on for awhile as more keeps coming to mind,it has me thinking that $l0K I mentioned is low. Besides purposely overloading a bid item is against the law.This isnt permitted for reason's just like this. The more I think of this has me now saying I would have to protest doing an overlay using B.I.14 as basis to pay me. Also the price given by me is a very good price and fair. On my Lake Arrowhead job for the city the square footage price was $3.00 per square foot. Hopefully I was successfull showing my points, if not there's much much more to go over. Hope to hear from you soon. SINCERELY, SCOTT A. SNYDER A.D. GEN. ENGR. CONST. INC, 1 . _ _, . _ Harvilla,George :. From: Harvilla, George Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 5:18 PM To: 'Tom Holliman; 'Ralph Roberts' Subject: Walnut and Juniper Paving Tom/Ralph, I have calculated the amount of asphalt necessary for the temporary trench pavement,the permanent trench pavement, and a 2"overlay cap for Walnut and Juniper Avenues. According to my calculations below, 1,112 tons are required. A.D. General has 1300 tons in their bid. Please check my calculations before we contact Scott Snyder. There still may be additional items he can claim, including cold planing near the homes,tack spray, and pavement markings. Please respond back to me by tomorrow if possible so I can reply to Scott. Walnut Avenue 2"Temp. A.0 for trench > 1320'x 4'x.17' = 900 cf 3" Perm A.C. for trench > 1320'x 4'x .25' = 1,320 cf 2"Overlay> 1320'x 24' x .17'= 5,390 cf TOTAL=7,610 cf Juniper Avenue 2"Temp.A.0 for trench > 1740'x 4'x .17'= 1,185 cf 3" Perm A.C.for trench > 1740'x 4'x .25' = 1,740 cf 2"Overlay> 1740' x 20'x.17'= 5,915 cf 2"Overlay near homes 320'x 12'x.17' =655 cf TOTAL =9,495 cf GRAND TOTAL> 17,105 cf 17,105 cf x 130 lb/cf=2,223,650 lb 2,223,650 lb x 1 ton/2000 lb= 1,112 tons RE: PAVING OVERLAY OF JUNIPER AVE. Page 1 of 2 Harvilla, George From: Curtis Aaron [caaron@fontana.org] Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 2:56 PM To: 'Harvilla, George' Cc: Carla Pursel; Paul Balbach; Scott Bangle Subject: RE: PAVING OVERLAY OF JUNIPER George: Per our discussion, I think a full 2" overlay would be beneficial and would recommend moving forward with the change. If your project runs short of funds let me know. Curtis Aaron Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla©pbworld.com] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 1:43 PM To: 'caaron@fontana.org' Subject: FW: PAVING OVERLAY OF JUNIPER AVE. Importance: High FYI Original Message From: Harvilla, George Sent: Friday,August 16, 2002 1:40 PM To: Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com); 'Ralph Roberts' Cc: 'Paul Balbach'; Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org); 'acurtis@fontana.org' Subject: FW: PAVING OVERLAY OF JUNIPER AVE. Importance: High Tom/Ralph, Please review this estimate and get back to me. We have a construction contingency of$47,104, so if we accepted Scott's price we'd have very little contingency left without going back to the Council for more $$$$. George Original Message From: SCOTT SNYDER [mailto:adgenengrPdirectvinternet.com] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 11:08 AM 8/19/2002 RE: PAVING OVERLAY OF JUNIPER AVE. Page 2 of 2 To: Harvilla, George Subject: PAVING OVERLAY IF JUNIPER AVE. George, I have a price for the 2" A/C overlay on Juniper. It includes cold planing at joins and the 300 If at the curb &gutter where the homes are, SS1h tack spray over entire surface, single broken yellow lane divider line down center of roadway and limit lines at intersections if desired with "Stop" painted all in Thermal Plastic, traffic control, and other related items to give a complete product. The cost is $45,220 which is $1.19 per sq.ft. There is aprox. 38,000 sq.ft. of roadway area. The job will take a day with traffic opened up by end of day or sooner if possible. We will work with the residents living on this street in order to limit the inconvenience for them. Sincerely, Scott A. Snyder A.D. General Engineering Const. Inc. 8/19/2002 x . Harvilla, George From: Tom Holliman [tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Friday,August 16, 2002 1:55 PM To: "Ralph Roberts" Cc: George Harvilla (E-mail) Subject: FW: PAVING OVERLAY OF JUNIPER AVE. • Importance: High Ralph, I'm confused. When we designed this project and set up the specs we included enough asphalt pavement to replace Juniper because we thought it would be completely destroyed. A 2" A/C overlay on Juniper is significantly less than replacing it. Are we talking about adding $47,104 for the overlay and then deducting the asphalt they didn't put down in replacing in Juniper? If so what is the net difference in the contract? Thanks, Tom Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 1:40 PM To: Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com) ; 'Ralph Roberts' Cc: 'Paul Balbach' ; Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org) ; 'acurtis@fontana.org' Subject: FW: PAVING OVERLAY OF JUNIPER AVE. Importance: High Tom/Ralph, Please review this estimate and get back to me. We have a construction contingency of $47,104, so if we accepted Scott's price we'd have very little contingency left without going back to the Council for more $$$$. George Original Message From: SCOTT SNYDER [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 11:08 AM To: Harvilla, George Subject: PAVING OVERLAY IF JUNIPER AVE. George, I have a price for the 2" A/C overlay on Juniper. It includes cold planing at joins and the 300 if at the curb & gutter where the homes are, SSlh tack spray over entire surface, single broken yellow lane divider line down center of roadway and limit lines at intersections if desired with "Stop" painted all in Thermal Plastic, traffic control, and other related items to give a complete product. The cost is $45,220 which is $1.19 per sq.ft. There is aprox. 38,000 sq.ft. of roadway area. The job will take a day with traffic opened up by 1 end of day or sooner if possible. We will work with the residents living on this street in order to limit the inconvenience for them. Sincerely, Scott A. Snyder A.D. General Engineering Const. Inc. 2 Harvilla, George From: SCOTT SNYDER [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Friday,August 16, 2002 11:08 AM To: Harvilla, George Subject: PAVING OVERLAY IF JUNIPER AVE. George, I have a price for the 2" A/C overlay on Juniper. It includes cold planing at joins and the 300 if at the curb & gutter where the homes are, SSlh tack spray over entire surface, single broken yellow lane divider line down center of roadway and limit lines at intersections if desired with "Stop" painted all in Thermal Plastic, traffic control, and other related items to give a complete product. The cost is $45,220 which is $1.19 per sq.ft. There is aprox. 38, 000 sq.ft. of roadway area. The job will take a day with traffic opened up by end of day or sooner if possible. We will work with the residents living on this street in order to limit the inconvenience for them. Sincerely, Scott A. Snyder A.D. General Engineering Const. Inc. 1 Harvilla,George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 1:26 PM To: 'caaron@fontana.org'; Scott Snyder(adgenengr@directvinternet.com) Cc: 'Tom Holliman'; Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com); 'Carla Pursel'; Carlos Navarro (cnavarro@fontana.org); Paul Balbach (pbalbach@fontana.org); 'ypatanwala@fontana.org' Subject: Cost Proposal for Juniper Street Overlay Curtis, Juniper Avenue from Walnut Avenue to South Highland Avenue is in poor condition. Paul Balbach and I believe it would be advantageous to proceed with a 2"overlay over the entire street, rather than just over the sewer trench. We are asking the sewer contractor to prepare a cost proposal to do this. If you have concerns or comments, please let us know. Thanks. Scott, Please prepare a cost proposal to overlay Juniper Avenue from Walnut Avenue to the south side of South Highland Avenue. Base your estimate on a 2" overlay, 3/8", AR 4000. Yousuf/Tom/Curtis, v y° A-I" ‘,1 •-/ o 4- e",-// Q �D /i� tl.G( f i,• S e/' .S J r<J cav/ o f There no storm drains or curb&gutter at the intersection of Walnut/Juniper. Juniper, north of4r os,e, Walnut, has swales along both sides. Runoff flows to the south across dips in Walnut Avenue. I think theses dips could be made smoother with the 2"overlay. I can't think of any other solution to handle the runoff, short of installing an underground storm drain (which would be outside this I-`)--1y. project's scope). Any ideas you have would be helpful. We want to pave this intersection as soon as the Pac Bell crew finishes raising their line. The Pac Bell crew should finish in 2-5 days. Thanks, George Harvilla FW: PAVING OVERLAY OF JUNIPER AVE. Page 1 of 2 t Harvilla, George From: Paul Balbach [pbalbach@fontana.org] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 3:36 PM To: Curtis Aaron Cc: Scott Bangle; Ricardo Sandoval; Ray Bragg; Subject: FW: PAVING OVERLAY OF JUNIPER AVE. Importance: High Curtis, After the trenching for the sewer line, the condition of the roadway has worsened. $45 K seem very reasonable to overlay almost 1/2 mile of roadway. It will be a number of years before we do anything to Juniper. My vote is yes, lets do it. Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 1:40 PM To: Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com); 'Ralph Roberts' Cc: 'Paul Balbach'; Carla Purse! (cpursel@fontana.org); 'acurtis@fontana.org' Subject: FW: PAVING OVERLAY OF JUNIPER AVE. Importance: High Tom/Ralph, Please review this estimate and get back to me. We have a construction contingency of $47,104, so if we accepted Scott's price we'd have very little contingency left without going back to the Council for more $$$$. George Original Message From: SCOTT SNYDER [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 11:08 AM To: Harvilla, George Subject: PAVING OVERLAY IF JUNIPER AVE. George, I have a price for the 2" A/C overlay on Juniper. It 8/16/2002 FW: PAVING OVERLAY OF JUNIPER AVE. Page 2 of 2 includes cold planing at joins and the 300 If at the curb & gutter where the homes are, SS1h tack spray over entire surface, single broken yellow lane divider line down center of roadway and limit lines at intersections if desired with "Stop" painted all in Thermal Plastic, traffic control, and other related items to give a complete product. The cost is $45,220 which is $1.19 per sq.ft. There is aprox. 38,000 sq.ft. of roadway area. The job will take a day with traffic opened up by end of day or sooner if possible. We will work with the residents living on this street in order to limit the inconvenience for them. Sincerely, Scott A. Snyder A.D. General Engineering Const. Inc. 8/16/2002 Harvilla, C e From: Harvilla, George Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 1:50 PM To: 'Paul Balbach' Subject: FW: Private Paul, Now Scott Snyder from A.D. General wants a copy of the City's contract with Associated. I don't know what he's up to. Is this indeed a public document that can be released? George Original Message From: SCOTT SNYDER [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 11:55 AM To: Harvilla, George Subject: Private George, I wanted to know how and where I could get a copy of the contract specifications between the City and Associated Engr. This is all public records and available. Also any word on getting my check tomorrow at City Hall.? 1 e Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 9:38 AM To: 'SCOTT SNYDER' Subject: RE: Progress Pymt. #1 Hi Scott, I checked again this morning, and Carla said your payment should be issued this Thursday, August 22. I have been at the job site - if not every day, every other day - and have personally seen all the pipe, asphalt, and manholes that have been installed. Walnut Avenue looks very nice after the paving job on Friday. We appreciate your effort so far. As soon as the next invoice reaches me, I will make it my top priority to have it processed. I suggest using fax, e-mail, or Fed Ex to expedite matters. Sincerely, George Harvilla Original Message- --- From: SCOTT SNYDER [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 3:10 AM To: Harvilla@pbworld.com Subject: Progress Pymt. #1 Good morning George, hope you had a good weekend. Haven't heard anything more on my progress payment #1 since you wrote Carla. Will you please check into this for me? Next Monday the 26th is when Ralph and I go over Pay Request #2 and I turn it in. Ralph told me not to give it to you but to turn in to his office to Tom. They will review then forward on to you. I'll do it however you all want. My concern is the request sitting a couple days here and there while being reviewed by three different agencies and who knows how many people. You are not one of those who may inadvertently do that, your on top of matters, you try to keep things moving. George it's all about getting paid. Your Company want's paid as does Assoc. Eng. as soon as possible. I'm in the same situation, I can carry only so much on jobs before I get stretched out to far. With this next billing I'll have two sub's if not three wanting money thirty days from when they worked this is $50K-$100K depending on boring. At month's end I will have outlayed $80K for labor, plus $30K for excavator & operator, plus fuel, etc. all. I'll received all the pipe that's another $83K. So you see the need for prompt payment. I ask you keep the specifics in this E-mail to yourself, meaning dollar amounts. I tell you cause I trust you and so I want you to see the real picture. There's not nearly the number of rich contractors people believe there are, and prog pymnts are not profit checks like some think. I wish they were! Seriously though this job was bid by a person I got rid 1 i` �'of, a former minor partner, and he bid this job wrong. He got the plans the afternoon on the day prior to bid opening which some how got by me, so I did not get to check his numbers. This is not your concern it's mine I know. I tell you this so you know why I also need prompt payments. In all honesty this job will have zero profit to at most 1%. So I ask you again to keep this I have told you to yourself I just needed you to see it from my end. Thank you for your discreetness George. SCOTT A. SNYDER 2 J fi Original Message 14 c From: Tom Holliman [mailto:tomh@assoc-eng.com] 1 °l i �� Sent: Friday,August 16, 2002 1:01 PM ✓, f ,,�e- k To: 'Harvilla, George' Cc: "Ralph Roberts" 1 �I C / , / f Subject: RE: Water Line on Juniper v 0c r` f George, frj S Y� G The question of overtime is really more a matter of who is paying for the inspection time.,Since the contract dneuments-recur-the-cor-rtr.actor-to-pay for_ e_overtime inspection the City could ,--recover those dollars from the contractor to pay Associated.fox...ttaose-hours in excess of the inspection hours_we budgeted. My concern was centered on the our inspection "burn rate". Our budget was based on a set number of hours for inspection, at the regular rate. If for example that was 200 hours at$50.00/hour the total cost of inspection would be$10,000. If the contractor worked 50 of those hours as overtime hours,the total cost of the same 200 hours jumps to $11,250, or a net increase of$1,250. Since A-E has a not to exceed budget for inspection we would either have to stop inspecting at $10,000 spent, keep inspecting and have the City backcharge the contractor for the$1,250 and amend our not to exceed budget, or have the City increase our budget and fund it from their own resources. I would expect that if the contractor is working overtime to finsih the job early he's increasing his profit by reducing carrying costs,those increased profits would be the source of the overtime charges. Otherwise the City is paying$1,250 more for the same project. If they finish earlier it might be a push on the not to exceed budget for inspection, but the City would still be giving them more profit than they would have made on the job without overtime since that's the way it was bid. It is still your call if you want to deduct the overtime inspecton charges, but we cannot continue to inspect if the budget runs out. I just wanted to talk about this before it becomes an issue and see if the City has a standing policy. Thanks, Tom Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Friday,August 16, 2002 9:12 AM To: 'Tom Holliman' Subject: RE: Water Line on Juniper Tom, Is it possible that since longer days are being worked now, the job will be completed sooner, and it will be a wash? George Original Message From: Tom Holliman [mailto:tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 5:26 PM To: Harvilla, George ti Cc: "Ralph Roberts" Subject: RE: Water Line on Juniper George, As of this writing we still don't have a firm response, I will follow up myself and see if I can get a response. I know you've been busy coming back from vacation (I was swamped after coming home from Japan), but I sent you a memo right before you left hoping you would get it before you left. The paving of the Walnut/Juniper intersection has been addressed, but I didn't get a response on the overtime issue. Any thoughts? Tom Holliman Associated Engineers Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] ; Sent:Thursday, August 15, 2002 3:57 PM To: 'Tom Holliman' Cc: Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com) Subject: Water Line on Juniper Tom, The sewer contractor hit a concrete-encased water line on Juniper several weeks ago. Ralph tells me calls to the water company to find out who owns it are never returned. Have you had any success finding out about this line?" George Harvilla, George From: SCOTT SNYDER [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 12:05 PM To: Harvilla, George; Harvilla, George Cc: tomh@assoc-eng.com; ralphr@assoc-eng.com;tomh@assoc-eng.com; ralphr@assoc- eng.com Subject: RE: Holiday If work permits we plan on being off that Friday and Monday of the Labor Day Holiday Weekend. For sure the office will be closed those day's, but the crew may work the Friday depending upon the requirements of the job. I'll be in town and will check the site daily. I hope this clarifies the prior E-mail. Scott A. Snyder 1 Harvilla, George From: SCOTT SNYDER [adgenengr@directvinternet.comj Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 7:52 AM To: Harvilla@pbworld.com Cc: tomh@assoc-eng.com; ralphr@assoc-eng.com Subject: Labor Day Holiday We are planning to close the office and job site down for the Labor Day Holiday Weekend, beging Friday through Monday, September 2nd. However I will check the job site daily over the long weekend. Just as a reminder refer to the Emergency Contact Sht. for our numbers & contact personnel. From all of us at A.D. Gen. we wish all of you and your families a safe end of summer holiday weekend. SCOTT A. SNYDER A.D. GENERAL ENGINEERING CONST. INC, . 1 Harviila, George. From: Harvilla, George Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 10:09 AM To: Scott Snyder (adgenengr@directvinternet.com) Subject: E-mails Hello Scott, I am having trouble reading some of your e-mails because you do not separate your messages into distinct paragraphs—your messages are coming through as one giant block of text which is sometimes hard to read. Can you please hit your enter/return key twice at the end of a paragraph so your paragraphs are separated by a blank line? Thank you, George Walnut Avenue Page 1 of 2 Harvilla, George From: Tom Holliman [tomh@assoc- Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 2:31 PM To: Harvilla, George Cc: "Ralph Roberts" Subject: RE: Walnut Avenue George, I have several items for you this morning. Hopefully we can get some direction on items 2 and 3 before you leave on vacation. 1. I spoke with Larry Signaigo at Pacific Bell and sent him a copy (electronically) of our plan showing the conflict. He informed me that he would prepare the field order and send it to the appropriate party to have a field engineer come out to the site with the authority to direct his crews to do whatever was necessary to remove the interference. He also said he would provide me with a copy of his transmittal, as of this memo I haven't recieved a copy of the transmittal. I will call Larry again if I don't get it today. With that information I can let you, Ralph, Carlos, and AD General know who and when Pac Bell will be on site. 2. Regarding the pavement. There are two issues on Walnut. We were asked to increase the amount of asphalt in our original bid estimates to accomodate some additional paving on Walnut, but the City was particularly interested in changing the intersection of Walnut and Juniper to eliminate the localized depression that the apparent cause of pavement of breakdown (i.e. trapping runoff). We have enough pavement in the contract to repave Walnut and fix the intersections of Juniper/Walnut and probably Walnut/Cypress so at least the roadways are fixed in the area we worked. The question is what the next surface profile of the intersections should be. If we simply repave the intersections to the existing contours the dips will remain and the new sections will fail. If there someone at the City who can either direct their staff, an existing street designer, or authorize us to design these intersections? 3. Last item, overtime. Ralph has informed me that the contractor is working longer hours,which is good for progress especially with the longer working days afforded by the summer, and Josef at the City has asked Ralph to inspect the site prior to working each day and after the contractor leaves to ensure the traffic control is in place and there are no problems. This has lead to Ralph working 10-12 hours days, and puts him over the 40 per week limit for regular time. I have instructed him to obtain written approval from the contractor to pay for his overtime hours if their works causes him to go over the 40 hour per week limit, but I would also like to have the City approve the overtime charges for work caused by their request. I only budgeted straight time in our inspection budget. Ralph has been, and will continue, to provide inspection when the contractor is working, and if the City asks for inspection outside the contractor's working period, we will provide that as well, however I need to know how we're going to handle those extra charges before our budget is exhausted. Thanks, 1 4 Tom Holliman Associated Engineers, Inc. P iLc 1„ cr Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Wednesday,July 31, 2002 10:25 AM To: Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com) Cc: 'Ralph Roberts'; 'Carla Pursel' Subject: Walnut Avenue Tom, Please continue working with Pac Bell to move/modify their lines at the corner of Juniper/Walnut. After they do, A. D. General should completely finish Walnut, including installing manholes and permanent pavement. Carla is contacting Curtis Aaron (Public Services Director) to see if he wants all of Walnut paved, instead of just the trench. Scott 8/12/2002 Walnut Avenue Page 2 of 2 • says he will have enough asphalt to overlay the whole street and a change order will not be 4- needed. As you know I will be out August. 1 -12. Contact Carla or Carlos if any issues come up. Thanks, George 8/12/2002 CITY OF FONTANA REPORT NO. INSPECTORS DAILY REPORT DATE 8/13/02 CIRCLE DAY M ❑T W TFS S SHIFT HOURS START 06:30 STOP 15:30 Walnut/Juniper/ So. Highland Sewer Improvement HOURS-ITEM NO. WEATHER PROJECT Clear/Warm 65/102 AD General CONTRACTOR EQUIP MEN DESCRIPTION REMARKS JD 200 Exc. JD 410 Hoe 1 Operator 8.5 Cat 936 8.0 Water Trk Driver 8.0 Dump Trk Driver 8.0 sweeper 2.0 5 Laborer 8.5 1 Forman 8.5 Vib Compact. 8.0 Vib Steel 8.0 Compacted the top 1'of trench backfill with -3" native soil that was reclaimed from the main trench excavation.All soils tests passed. Placed AC base pavement on the trenchline from Sta. 00+02 to Sta. 9+00.Average trench width-was 3.5'.Total tonnage of AC was 123 tons. * I instructed the crew that they needed to watch the width that they were paving. I will measure the acutal area repaved and report the approximate square footage placed.There should have been 85 to 90 Tons replaced.This may become an issue at payment time,the bid item is listed as tons placed, not square footage. Clean up went well,traffic control was also effective again today. George Harvilla visited the site today, reviewed the current issues and reviewed progress on the project. We visited the PacBell relocation crew progress,and viewed the intersection of Walnut and Juniper, regarding i the re-elevation of the intersection. We also discussed the overlay for Walnut,a 2"overlay will be placed, with 3/8",AR4000 from the east limit line at the intersection of Cypress and Walnut,to the east limit line at the intersection of Walnut and Juniper,with the entire intersection to be overlayed. CONTRACTOR INSPECTOR Clear Day Page 1 of 1 Harvilla, George From: Carla Pursel [cpursel@fontana.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 1:59 To: Harvilla, George Subject: Contracts and environmental docs George, Yes, Paul signed and I've mailed the negative declaration forms to the county for Summit Avenue. I've attached a copy of the documents for you (pretty cool, huh). Regarding the contracts for AD and Associated Engineers, I'm the staff report for the approval of the contract and amendment. Yes, we approved the contract amounts plus and additional 10% as a contingency to be used for "additional/overlooked"items that may exceed the dollar amount of the contract. The 10% contingency is only to be used at the approval of the city/project manager. Sound good to you??? Let me know if you need me to clarify this for you. cp Carla S. Pursel Administrative Project Coordinator CITY OF FONTANA Redevelopment&Special Projects 909.350.6792 8/15/2002 Harvilla, George From: SCOTT SNYDER [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 1:05 PM To: tomh@assoc-eng.com Cc: Harvilla@pbworld.com Subject: Overtime Please let me know if overtime has occurred on South Highland Sewer Project. Also I would appreciate info on O.T. rates and a weekly update for any charges. Please show a daily and weekly summary. Thank You. Scott A. Snyder l 1 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Tuesday,August 20, 2002 4:48 PM To: 'SCOTT SNYDER ' Cc: 'pbalbach @fontana.org Subject: RE: Prog Pmt>#1 Scott, I asked the Acting Director of Redevelopment, Paul Balbach, to check into your payment. He contacted the head of the City's Finance Department. She told Paul they are making your payment a priority for this Thursday afternoon. It can take the City up to 30 days to process these invoices. I know you plan on turning in your next invoice on August 26. I will try to expedite the City's engineering review, but we could still be looking at 30 days once it gets to Finance. George Original Message From: SCOTT SNYDER To: Harvilla, George Sent: 8/20/02 3 :46 PM Subject: Prog Pmt>41 George will we be allowed to pick up our check from the City this Thursday? Have you heard back on this yet? Thanks, Scott 1 Harvilla, George From: SCOTT SNYDER [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 11:58 AM To: tomh@assoc-eng.com Cc: Harvilla, George; ralphr@assoc-eng.com Subject: Pipe for Boring At this time we are going to stay with the no-dig pipe as per plan. I will submit a change if needed. Scott A. Snyder 1 Harvilla, George From: Tom Holliman [tomh@assoc-eng.com] ,_,�,� j c, t,�� - Sent: Wednesday,August 21, 2002 8:51 AM To: 'SCOTTSNYDER;tomh@assoc-eng.com < pPil, t 14- ,./,f ',7-7c Cc: Harvilla@pbworld.com; ralphr@assoc-eng.com ,¢ <<,. < J G c , t7,;,- fte cf Subject: RE: y . Scott, Your email covers two topics so I'll answer them seperately. 1. If you want to request a substitution of materials, on behalf of your sub Ayala, the process is fairly straight forward. Submit the request in writing indicating why you either cannot comply with the plans and specifications, or why this alternative will cost less and how much of a credit you are proposing to the City for this change. If you can install the work as designed and bid, and there is no cost savings to the City, you need to describe why this no cost change will benefit the City. Absent that information you should direct Ayala to install the specified materials. 2 . If there is a cost savings in deleting the no-dig pipe the cost savings would be the difference in the pipe materials. You are correct in stating that the unit price bid for the standard pipe includes excavation, backfill, etc. If you would provide that cost difference and some amount of backup material to validate the costs we would present the cost savings to the City for review and approval. If they accept the discount we would process a change order substituting the standard pipe for the no-dig pipe and deduct the discount from the contract. The submittal can be brief we just need enough information to understand your numbers. We support ideas which will provide equal or better facilities and save the City of Fontana money. We appreciate your working toward that end as well. If you have any other questions please contact me at your convenience. Tom Holliman Associated Engineers Original Message From: SCOTT SNYDER [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 11:03 PM To: tomh@assoc-eng.com Cc: Harvilla@pbworld.com; ralphr@assoc-eng.com Subject: A.D. mentioned to our boring sub Ayala, that we would have the 135ft of 10" V.C.P. , extra strength, no-dig pipe delivered to the job for their bore. Mr Ayala said he has always used the same pipe used for open cut. There is no forces on the pipe that the skid system they use lets the force be place on the skids not the pipe. The skids are made of a polyvinyl compound. Our job Inspector Ralph, correctly instructed me to inform you Tom, of Ayala's intent to use open cut piping. This raised the question of the higher price for the bore piping. If I understood Ralph he say's I ought to receive the Open Cut price since using open cut pipe. This higher price is not for the higher cost of the pipe alone. It's also for the added cost we will have working on this pipe to connect to M.H. 's, etc. Please provide your answer/comments a.s.a.p. Thank You, 1 Harvilla, George From: Tom Holliman [tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Tuesday,August 20, 2002 1:40 PM To: 'SCOTT SNYDER' Cc: Harvilla, George; ralphr@assoc-eng.com Subject: RE: Boring For South Highland Ave Sewer Project We have contacted OSHA to obtain the classification and have been informed it will be available this afternoon. This information has been passed on to the field via our inspector Ralph Roberts. As soon as we recieve the fax we will fax it to you and the City. If you have a fax number for Ayala I can fax it directly to them as well. Tom Holliman Associated Engineers -----Original Message From: SCOTT SNYDER [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 12:43 PM To: tomh@assoc-eng.com Cc: Harvilla@pbworld.com; ralphr@assoc-eng.com Subject: Boring For South Highland Ave Sewer Project This is to follow up the verbal conversation held yesterday on the job site. We are waiting on soils classifacation paper work required for the bore to begin. Our sub-contractor Ayala Boring had the work scheduled to begin this past Monday the 19th but could not pending the needed paper work. Ayala informed A.D. yesterday if the paper work is not obtained today, Tuesday 20th Aug. , it will be six weeks before they would be able to return. A.D. will have completed all work except that tied in with the boring, will have moved off this project and working on our job in the City of Commerce. I will need to discuss the matter with the city concerning such matters as the excavated bore pits, among other things. Please keep our office informed on this situation. Thank You, Scott A. Snyder A.D. Gen Engr Const Inc. , 1 Paving Walnut Street Page 1 of 1 Harvilla, George From: Carla Pursel [cpursel@fontana.org] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 8:27 64 VF-e,/ To: 'adgeneng@directvinternet.com' 0 � Cc: 'George Harvilla @ PB' J 71 (1-'2 Subject: FW: Paving Walnut Street. Scott- below is the response from our Public Services Department. Looks okay to go ahead with the paving. - << If you have any questions,please feel free to call me. cp Carla S. Pursel Administrative Project Coordinator City of Fontana REDEVELOPMENT/SPECIAL PROJECTS 909.350.6792 cpursel @fontana.orq Original Message From: Curtis Aaron Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 2:06 PM To: 'Harvilla, George' Cc: Carla Pursel Subject: RE: Paving Walnut Street George: Please proceed with the full width paving on Walnut Avenue between Juniper and Cypress Avenue.This area is not in our near term project listing and would improve a sub-standard situation. Curtis Aaron Director of Public Services Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Tuesday,July 30, 2002 5:16 PM To: 'SCOTT SNYDER' Cc: Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org); 'caaron@fontana.org' Subject: Paving Walnut Street =„ Scott, I have left a voice-mail with Curtis Aaron,the Public Services Director, regarding your offer to pave the full- width of Walnut Avenue, rather than just the trench width over the sewer line. George Harvilla Consultant Project Manager 8/12/2002 Harvilla, GE��ge From: Ralph Roberts [coralph@earthlink.net] Sent: Sunday, August 04, 2002 5:46 PM To: Harvilla, George; SCOTT SNYDER;tomh@assoc-eng.com Subject: Re: My Apology Scott, The Construction Manager is Tom Holiman, at Associated Engineers. He reports to George Harvilla, the Project Manager for the City. George Reports to Ray Bragg, City of Fontana, Redevelopment Agency Director. I report to Tom, George, and also Carlos Navarro, the City of Fontana Public Works Inspection Supervisor. The way the paperwork flow has been described to me is; I track all work progress, document it in my daily reports, copy to Carlos, Tom. I prepare the pay estimates for your progress pay requests, based on these quanties. To eliminate any discrepencies, we (you or Brian, and myself) review footages and/or items installed for payment. You prepare an invoice that will match my pay estimates. You submit this request in an invoice to George. Tom creates the letter of authorization for payment, based on quantities reported by me. Here is where there is currently a problem. I am to submit my pay estimates to the Construction Manager, Tom. He will prepare a letter of authorization for submittal to George. If this letter does not match exactly the invoice that you submit to George, there will be a delay in the processing of the payment. Nothing will proceede payment-wise until the paperwork matches. Period. I asked you to send me a copy of the invoice so that I would be able to verify the numbers that you were going to bill for. I know we talked about the footages the day before, but the other bid items were a bit more confusing to keep straight. I was unable to create the pay estimates for Tom to create his letter of authorization for George to direct the check to be processed. See, kinda confusing, but nevertheless, a process that must be adhered to. I know that you needed the pay request to get thru quickly, George going on vacation and all, but from now on, the process will be held to. Period. I have been told, in no uncertain terms, that the process will be held to. I did not ask what might happen if not, I did not need to. If I can be of help with the email thing, or helping you with other technical things with the computer, let me know. I have lots of resources and knowledge of computers Original Message From: "SCOTT SNYDER" <adgenengr@directvinternet.com> To: <coralph@earthlink.net> Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2002 10:55 AM Subject: My Apology > Ralph, > About the pay request,I never intended to not go > through you. The afternoon we went over quantities I > did'nt get home till midnight. Jodie had made up the > invoice and per George Harvilla she sent it to him. The reason being > G.H. said everything was to go through him and he said if Jodie got > him the invoice to him a check would be ready in ten work days. > I apologize for any foul up I did it is not > intentional. Jodie and I have such a work load due to > some issues we are swamped. Plus our oldest son's > wedding is in three weeks. People are coming from > Washington and staying at our house and the rehearsal > dinner is at our house, about 50 people. So please > understand and know I appreciate what you do and how > you work with us. 1 > I havent had time to learn to scan and send as > E-mail yet, I've tried but it doesn't work. So I cant send things this way yet but I'll get it. ` > I want to show respect to everyone so for your info > Jodie and I were told that technical and design > questions go to you guys at assoc's everything else is > to go through the construction manager, he will forward > on to all parties involved. This puts me in the middle > Ralph,. I want you to know what we are told to do, > perhaps you guys are unaware of. 2 Harvilla, George.. From: Harvilla, George Sent: Tuesday,July 30, 2002 12:10 PM To: Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org) Cc: Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org); 'SCOTT SNYDER; 'Tom Holliman'; Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com) Subject: Juniper Sewer Extension Ray, I just spoke to Larry Bonanno,the landowner who requested an extension to the Juniper Avenue sewer line presently under construction. I told him that you wanted to keep his extension completely separate from the City's project, and that the extension would have to be a private arrangement between him and Associated Engineers/A.D. General, and that construction could not begin until after the City accepts the line as presently designed. He said"I thought the City was developer friendly. Isn't the purpose of this line to serve the proposed auto mall?" I told him that the purpose of the line was to serve the two parcels at the corner of Sierra and South Highland. He then said, "Tell Mr. Bragg thank you". I got the impression he will not pursue this any further. George FW: Proposed Extension to Juniper Sewer Line Page 1 of 1 Harvilla, George From: Ray Bragg [rbragg@fontana.org] rod.. �; (o„r�,f+� r,.,s2 C,f /1-0)�� Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 4:58 PM e C�c/- (CC/d4 ( � c To: 'Harvilla, George' Subject: RE: Proposed Extension to Juniper Sewer 42,A.-- ee, rep G.ulce And George, we are not going to allow Mr.Bonano to put in any sewer line up Juniper Avenue beyond S. Highland. Ray Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 3:39 PM To: Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com) Cc: Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com); 'Ray Bragg'; Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org) Subject: FW: Proposed Extension to Juniper Sewer Line Tom, Ray Bragg has said that any effort spent on this proposed extension by Associated Engineers or City Staff will not be paid for by the City. Any effort you spend on this will either be on your dime, or you must come to some sort of agreement with Mr. Bonanno. George Original Message From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday,July 25, 2002 12:08 PM To: Tom Holliman (tomh@ assoc-eng.com) Cc: 'Scott Snyder'; 'Ralph Roberts'; Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.orq); Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org); Carlos Navarro (cnavarro@fontana.org) Subject: Proposed Extension to Juniper Sewer Line Tom, Yesterday, a property owner named Larry Bonanno asked about extending the Juniper Avenue sewer to the north to serve a parcel he owns, specifically Parcel 240-091-36. I believe extending the line by 15 feet will give access to the south edge of that parcel. Any extension to this line would be considered a private agreement between Mr. Bonanno and A. D. General Construction Company. Mr. Bonanno would compensate A.D. General directly and the City would own the line. The City's construction schedule will not be extended/modified if a deal is struck. Tom, I will fax you a parcel map which Mr. Bonanno gave me yesterday. Please confirm my finding. The grade of the line should be reviewed to see if the proposed grade of 0.1113 needs to be modified north of Manhole 9. The City's plan checkers will have to do a quick review and then A.D. General could negotiate with Mr. Bonanno. Scott, Mr. Bonanno's phone number is 909-862-7774. Only Scott or City representatives should contact Mr. Bonanno, George Harvilla 7/26/2002 _ . FAX —too YEARS PARSONS 16689 Foothill Boulevard BR1NCKERHOFF Suite 103 Fontana,CA 92335 909-427-9166 Fax:909-427-9169 harvilla@pbworld.com To: 7- ��� /�� From: George Harvilla 4r Date: -7_ 2 s-_ o L ArSv ��c. nir r. • Project No.: Fax No.: (7 47Y- O ef/ No. of Pages (including this page): Z Subject: � � Comments: / ',e"C 4.7 C c- /;-, e ,r 4 4-H O+a `/o ,1 Gn1 7L frog-7 I� Q✓ vvi ciy Ho� h c ja.. � s�AE O 1 2Vo 9/-76. Over a Century of I Engineering Excellence RESPONSE REQUESTED � ,,, • rvr. yang y r v • 0 1853 0 te-Original Acr,age• & - Distances to S eet Centers. A . J -- SIERRA -� - ^ • , . • � f f,i2,r4 Ili ZJq 11 ',kg,. Q . C,, X N z o h vs q a . C j \ 3 q ' q N v0 0 • `: .C•• , % h _356. M m ,,8.7 J - `% --- J --- q in \ >\� 1 N N ciS • o ki t� ��Q 6 ��o----. v Q a ,,,-. v 4, `" P vt 6 at � C� • ' ° -- rrl Q k . " J • a Z (kJt`.) fi 0 6 qe u CI 0 \ c iZI �� N J a N al N Q Z Ci U l q Q .ccC _ ^5 0 v o , ,. 0 o , , h SD u 1;.,: Z S Z� fir. T - j �. -6'� �. 26.9:74 ,c 6'9. 7'4 i73_ t \ �T- ,�--cC• --;-Iti JUNIPER - -i 1 i 0 r \‘t 0 Parcel Map No. 8521, PM. 103/15,16 3 Parcel Map No. 794, P. M.8/70 Qv Tract No. 1911 M.B. 27.71 ..� Frank C. Platt Tr. No. 2115 M.B. 31/53 .'ept. 1951 Haryana, George. : . .......:......... From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday,July 25,2002 12:08 PM To: Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com) Cc: 'Scott Snyder'; 'Ralph Roberts; Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org); Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org); Carlos Navarro (cnavarro@fontana.org) Subject: Proposed Extension to Juniper Sewer Line Tom, Yesterday, a property owner named Larry Bonanno asked about extending the Juniper Avenue sewer to the north to serve a parcel he owns, specifically Parcel 240-091-36. I believe extending the line by 15 feet will give access to the south edge of that parcel. Any extension to this line would be considered a private agreement between Mr. Bonanno and A. D. General Construction Company. Mr. Bonanno would compensate A.D. General directly and the City would own the line. The City's construction schedule will not be extended/modified if a deal is struck. Tom, I will fax you a parcel map which Mr. Bonanno gave me yesterday. Please confirm my finding. The grade of the line should be reviewed to see if the proposed grade of 0.1113 needs to be modified north of Manhole 9. The City's plan checkers will have to do a quick review and then A.D. General could negotiate with Mr. Bonanno. Scott, Mr. Bonanno's phone number is 909-862-7774. Only Scott or City representatives should contact Mr. Bonanno. George Harvilla • rra . LARRY BONANNQ N g lisetiTS f 0 Y.i t y A{ (} Yf .X..„°.a..W?Y ..x.. fh wp?,zw/5fiou'cG✓r< rro1�RAMq ppnxuwxSSnrok 7493 Flintlock Ct. Highland,CA 92346 (909)862-7774 • / %� G `1 a C �j !�J �t H 6 Harvilla, George From: SCOTT SNYDER [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Thursday,July 25, 2002 4:54 AM To: Harvilla@pbworld.com Subject: Construction Schedule for S. Highland Ave Sewer Hi George, Regarding Walnut Ave and the time completion. What has stopped work is the Telephone Company's ducting is too o vo low by about a foot. It's bottom is at elevation — iir7 1457.00+/-, and the pipe invert elev. is 1457.97. The Insp. Ralph said the phone co. would be out to look then see what to do. That was to happen Tuesday. We had to stop pipe laying short 18ft of the tele line to M.H.#4 and skip over to line B starting at M.H.#4 heading up Juniper Ave. I dont know what the phone co. is going to do. This prevents me from putting in the pipe, installing the M.H.s and paving. Had this not have been work on the M.H.s would've been completed this Fri. or Mon. Then a couple three days for paving,MM'aking the First of August deadline despite the intial delay from the NTP. Now I need two weeks minimum from when the phone line interference is resolved. It may be I am directed to lower the sewer line's elevation thus removing the installed pipe just put in. I cannot assume anything, I hope you understand. 1 Original Message From: SCOTT SNYDER [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com]. Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 5:22 AM To: Harvilla, George Subject: George I dont want to get anyone in trouble or like to place blame but it cant be prevented at times. For now I'm keeping this between you and I. Bryan potholed this prior to us laying any pipe. He told Ralph and I the telephone lines ducting was toolow. Ralph wasnt there to see this-it was getting late and the hole needed to be backfilled. I calculated the elevation and slope for lowering the sewer main to clear the phone and still be able to join at the tie-in MH at Cypress. It was close but was ok. Ralph wanted to see this and I wanted Bryan to give me an exact measurement to the bottom of the phone conduit, so Bryan redug the line out for Ralph to measure the next day. Bryan also asked for the surveyor to come out but Ithe didnt. Ralph took the measurement and said we were wrong there was enough clearence. I asked Ralph what he found and he said it was alright there was room. Honestly George this didnt sound right to me cause I know Bryan is very thorough but I thought again saying to myself maybe Bryan was wrong. I didnt want to second guess the Inspector. Some people really go off on us when we dont agree with them. I wouldnt let that stop me from doing whats right but this wasnt that sort of situation. I simply want to do a good job with no problems as fast as I can as well as I can. It doesnt help to get the Insp. angry with me right off the bat. Sincerely, Scott. ps- I am telling you alone for now. If I need to protect myself then I will make this all known officially. Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Wednesday,July 24, 2002 6:23 PM To: Scott Snyder(adgenengr@directvinternet.com) Cc: 'Ray Bragg'; Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org); Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc- eng.com); 'Tom Holliman'; Carlos Navarro (cnavarro@fontana.org) Subject: South Highland Sewer Construction Schedule Hello Scott, Regarding the construction schedule,the construction period for Walnut Avenue of July 1 - August 1 (per the specs)was based on the City providing you with an NTP on June 19. The NTP was not issued until June 27 due to various delays. You then had 10 days to begin construction. Because of this delay, the City is extending the construction period for Walnut Avenue until 4:00 p.m. on Friday, August 9, 2002. I interpret this as all items being complete, including the manholes and permanent pavement. If for some reason you don't think you will able to complete the construction on Walnut Avenue by this date and time, please call me and we will discuss this further. The intention of the accelerated schedule along Walnut Avenue is to have construction 100% complete near the High School as soon as possible due to the large number of students who walk along Walnut Street each day to summer school. Today, Ralph said you wanted to screen some rock this Saturday. The Specifications (Page SP- 7) say the Contractor's working hours will be limited from 7:00 a.m.to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Deviation requires written request to the City and Engineer at least 5 working days in advance. I received word verbally today and will not require a written request. Permission is granted to work this Saturday,July 27. I ask that your crews not generate excessive noise until at least mid-morning. We realize that temperatures have been over 100 degrees and we appreciate the effort you and your crews have been putting in. Please call or e-mail me if you have any additional concerns. Sincerely, George Harvilla Consultant Project Manger City of Fontana Harvilla, George From: SCOTT SNYDER [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Wednesday,July 24, 2002 3:51 PM To: Harvilla@pbworld.com Cc: ralph@assoc-engr.com Subject: Paving of Walnut Ave.- Request for Information Please provide clarification as to what the intent for A/C paving on Walnut Ave. is. My new E-mail address is adgenengr@directvinternet.com. The aol is still good for awhile but please start sending to this address. 1 Harvilla, George From: SCOTT SNYDER [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Wednesday,July 24, 2002 4:00 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: Completion time on Walnut Ave. • George, My Crew Leader Bryan mentioned I would be getting an E-mail from you regarding Walnut needing to be completed entirely by the first of August. I have not yet received such from you. I want to remind you of the fact that work could not begin until the notice in the local news paper had run ten {10} days, which was the eighth {8th} of July,02. Sincerely, Scott A. Snyder A.D. Gen. Engr. Const. Inc. 1 Harvilla,George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Wednesday,July 24, 2002 3:45 PM To: Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org) Subject: Road Closure Dates Carla, This is what I dug up.... Please confirm. The June 4 City Council Staff Report says Walnut and Juniper(each) would be closed for approximate two weeks sometime between July 1 and Sept. 15,2002. The letter to the resident says Walnut will be closed between July 8 and 26, and Juniper between July 15 and August 15. The Specs (Page Sp-7) say the Contractor's working hours will be limited form 7:00 to 4:00 Monday through Friday. Deviation requires written request to City and Engineer at least 5 working days in advance. George Sewer Schedule Page 1 of 1 Harvilla, George From: Ray Bragg Sent: Monday,July 22, 2002 4:29 PM To: 'Harvilla, George' Subject: RE: Sewer Schedule Good point George. Ray Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Monday,July 22, 2002 4:25 PM To: 'Tom Holliman'; Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com) Cc: 'Ray Bragg'; Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org) Subject: Sewer Schedule Tom/Ralph, The contractor apparently plans on installing the sewer pipe first, and then returning to install manholes and permanent pavement. The schedule in the specifications says that work along Walnut Street is limited to July 1 to August 1. I interpret this as ALL items being complete, including the manholes and permanent pavement. The idea behind this schedule was to clear the area by the high school as quickly as possibly. The contractor has until Sept. 15 to complete work on Juniper and South Highland. August 1 is fast approaching. Please remind the contractor of the specified date(s)for construction on Walnut Street. Thank you, George Harvilla 7/22/2002 Page 1 of 1 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 4:28 PM To: 'ADGENENGR@aol.com' Cc: Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com);Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc- Subject: RE: S. Highland Sewer Substructure Interference Scott, Thank you for the update. George Original Message From: ADGENENGR@aol.com [mailto:ADGENENGR@aol.com] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 12:22 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: S. Highland Sewer Substructure Interference George, I told you I would keep you informed of matters so I want to let you know of a telephone substructure crossing Line A on Walnut Ave. approx. 25-30 feet west of M.H. #4. We had potholed this prior to excavating then re-potholed and received an OK for clearance. However today pipe laying reached this point and we found the telephone is to low by approx. 8 ", and crosses through the new sewer lines elevation. The Inspector was on site and told of the situation. At this time we are stopping short and resuming pipe laying beyond this line crossing as directed. Sincerely, Scott A. Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction Inc. 7/22/2002 CITY OF FONTANA EMERGENCY INFORMATION FORM PROJECT NAME: South Highland Avenue-Juniper Avenue- Walnut Avenue Sewer Improvement (SP46-02) LOCATION: South Highland Avenue to Juniper Avenue to Walnut Avenue CONTRACTOR: AD. GENERAL ENGINEERING CONSTRT TCTTON ADDRESS: 2829 North Glenoaks Boulevard, Suite 101,Burbank, California, 91504 OFFICE PHONE: 818-559-7383 FAX NO.818-559-5502 CONTACT PERSON: Jodie Snyder RESIDENCE PHONE: 818-843-6697 MOBIL PHONE NO: Scott Snyder 818-395-9700 and 818-395-9701 JOB SUPERINTENDENT: Bryan Kier ADDRESS: 10209 Stonehurst, Sun Valley, California, 91352 MOBIL PHONE:_626-379-7908 RESIDENCE PHONE: 818-252-137'3 24 HOUR DISPATCH: N/A ADDRESS: DAY PHONE: RESIDENCE PHONE: CITY OF FONTANA -EMERGENCY PHONE NITMRERS Police Department: General Information 909-350-7700 Emergencies 911 Public Services Department 909-350-6760 Scott Bangle Cellular: 909-721-8361 Home: 909-795-2251 Anthony Ciotti Cellular: 909-721-8393 Home: 909-481-6612 Special Projects Departments 909-350-6792 George Harvilla Work: 909-427-9166 Home: 909-653-8430 Raymond Bragg Work: 909-350-7697 Home: 909-981-0380 Engineering Division 909-350-7610 Carlos Navarro Work: 909-350-6632 Cell: 909-538-1650 Emergency information The names, addresses and telephone numbers of the contractor and sub-contractors or his representatives, shall be filed with the City Engineer and the Police Department prior to beginning work. The contractor shall provide adequate detours to the satisfaction of the City Traffic Engineer. A detailed plan of such detours shall be submitted to the City Traffic Engineer at least five (5) days prior to the time the contractor wishes to close off the street or in any way restrict the traffic flow. In actual street closures, the submitted plan shall indicate the route of the detour, the character of the temporary pavement where required, and a layout of the locations of signs and lighting. In all other cases, the contractor shall provide adequate traffic flow in both directions. If traffic cannot be maintained the contractor shall provide flagmen whose sole duties consist of directing traffic through and around the work. In all cases, the approval of a suitable plan shall be granted to the contractor prior to the beginning of construction. Failure or refusal by the contractor to comply with the above mentioned requirements shall be sufficient cause for the City Engineer to order the work done by city forces and the cost therein to be borne by the contractor. cc: See Distribution List CITY OF FONTANA EMERGENCY INFORMATION FORM PROJECT NAME: South Highland Avenue-Juniper Avenue- Walnut Avenue Sewer Improvement (SP46-02) LOCATION: South Highland Avenue to Juniper Avenue to Walnut Avenue CONTRACTOR: A.S). GENFRAT.RNGTNF.F.RTNG CONSTRTJCTTON ADDRESS: 2829 North Glenoaks Boulevard, Suite 101,Burbank, California, 91504 OFFICE PHONE: 818-559-7383 FAX NO.818-559-5502 CONTACT PERSON: Jodie Snyder RESIDENCE PHONE: S18-843-6697 MOBIL PHONE NO: Scott Snyder 818-395-9700 and 818-395-9701 JOB SUPERINTENDENT: Bryan Kier ADDRESS: 10209 Stonehurst, Sun Valley, California, 91352 MOBIL PHONE: 626-379-7908 RESIDENCE PHONE: 818-252-1373 24 HOUR DISPATCH: N/A ADDRESS: DAY PHONE: RESIDENCE PHONE: CITY OF FONTANA -EMERGENCY PHONE NUMBERS Police Department: General Information 909-350-7700 Emergencies 911 Public Services Department 909-350-6760 Scott Bangle Cellular: 909-721-8361 Home: 909-795-2251 Anthony Ciotti Cellular: 909-721-8393 Home: 909-481-6612 Special Projects Department. 909-350-6792 George Harvilla Work: 909-427-9166 Home: 909-653-8430 Raymond Bragg Work: 909-350-7697 Home: 909-981-0380 Engineering Division 909-350-7610 Carlos Navarro Work: 909-350-6632 Cell: 909-538-1650 Fmergney Information The names, addresses and telephone numbers of the contractor and sub-contractors or his representatives, shall be filed with the City Engineer and the Police Department prior to beginning work. The contractor shall provide adequate detours to the satisfaction of the City Traffic Engineer. A detailed plan of such detours shall be submitted to the City Traffic Engineer at least five (5) days prior to the time the contractor wishes to close off the street or in any way restrict the traffic flow. In actual street closures, the submitted plan shall indicate the route of the detour, the character of the temporary pavement where required, and a layout of the locations of signs and lighting. In all other cases, the contractor shall provide adequate traffic flow in both directions. If traffic cannot be maintained the contractor shall provide flagmen whose sole duties consist of directing traffic through and around the work. In all cases, the approval of a suitable plan shall be granted to the contractor prior to the beginning of construction. Failure or refusal by the contractor to comply with the above mentioned requirements shall be sufficient cause for the City Engineer to order the work done by city forces and the cost therein to be borne by the contractor. cc: See Distribution List South Highland Sewer Meeting July 16,2002 2:00 p.m. Fontana City Hall Purpose of meeting to discuss the changes proposed by the contractor. o.,/> r f'11 f-c . r- �� 7, � �_��g .�9+r I reviewed the changes on behalf of the city, consulted with engineering staff at the City (-• — and at Associated, and then I denied the request for change on behalf of the City. Scott ` �5 expressed concern with the denial, so we are having this meeting to today to hear from A.D. General. • Self introductions and sign—in sheet • AD General to explain the proposed changes and why they are proposing them • Ray or George will explain the objective of the design • Associated Engineers to explain why the project was designed the way it was • Final decision /per, `/ (40, ?//ea G � l Prajc�¢' /� Ja •�� ir/ G 6 �� � at 6a r fCY� Je HI�+i6•of !i w ; /l �G� ;�: s;z C car, bPf�i rn /N,7S 5 Walnut-Juniper- South Highland Sewer Improvement Project Meeting Date: 07/16/02 2:00PM NAME AFFILIATION 1 :VOICE g: FAX 121: E-MAIL Re}c.P 14- /2o 3 b/L-r 495oc 04-11-9 ,1&/.1 etz,-5 f a q 37 a-o 05 3 . c o ri/p4 e4rY4 '&- .ti a r- ��-o'rr A "i.1i G i 41.1).C IJ• t ikl b 2.COIF; 9.183 gig -659-53-0,0? dd A l &•a®G!o/.Co/n Caro QkX't� o C O I u� a 5 o-Lola �� o-�CCp i g C��Cit��t�7 ,10 .,o %cdc( ao{For?tana 309 • 350, 9)9 . 559,7676 6io/1 er@kriona, or fa L/`PE M O L/NOS // 'i /g-1/Q• qOg 350 9O9 66/e F/IOL/N®s F4ti� to22 � t�,f' e 44, 1''4 4 oc- gA14,a- /NN, '( 930 !,°)82 " 9 4"/- CE 1 /1 ,G ,A/4 ri..\K4 A0•5 6c..(ALI to. it 99G�so 9/4 tj 9 3Z " 9 4 I O 5 / MiteS @ 4556c GGor{c /..vi//C jo/3 ez/ 9e 127—//46 gl'ac- ('2x7 /G p 7 .4•• /lG )4 co- ef0 01,15u- P wALA Q� _ c _ yr w #JTmN G- � �N � R�� so 6�4.r e(o�t -3 0 66 `�PA� �i � (� �o R -0 Last Revised: 7/16/02 Harvilla Geor e From: Harvilla, George Sent: Wednesday,July 17, 2002 10:53 AM To: Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org); Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com); Carlos Navarro (cnavarro@fontana.org);Todd Miller(tmiller@fontana.org); Felipe Molinos (fmolinos@fontana.org); Curt Ingraham (curti@assoc-eng.com); 'mikes@assoc- eng.com'; Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org); 'ypatanwala@fontana.org' Subject: Thank You I would like to thank all of you for taking the time to attend yesterday's meeting with the contractor of the South Highland Sewer. By meeting quickly we helped to prevent any construction delays and we sent a clear message that we want the project constructed as designed. Thanks again, George Harvilla Harvilla;George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday, July 11,2002 4:28 PM To: 'Scott Snyder' Cc: 'Ralph Roberts'; 'Curt Ingraham';Todd Miller (tmiller@fontana.org); Tom Holliman'; 'Carla Pursel'; Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org); 'Cnavarro@fontana.org' Subject: Proposed Changes to Sewer Project Importance: High July 11, 2002 Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Burbank, CA 91504 Dear Mr. Snyder, The City recently received a marked-up plan set for the South Highland Sewer showing contractor-proposed changes. The proposed changes are to raise the profile of the sewer along Juniper Avenue and South Highland Avenue, and to eliminate the borings under Sierra Avenue and South Highland Avenue. The profile was set by the designer to allow at least 6 feet of cover over the lateral serving the parcel at the southeast corner of Sierra/South Highland. Your proposed changes would not place the line deep enough to effectively serve this parcel. Both Sierra Avenue and South Highland Avenue are very busy arterials. One of the objectives of this project is to install this sewer without closing these streets for trenching operations. The proposed changes are not approved. The City requests that you proceed to install the sewer at the depth(s)specified on the plans, and to bore where shown on the plans. Sincerely, George Harvilla Consultant Project Manager City of Fontana Y/ Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Friday,July 12, 2002 6:30 PM To: 'fmolinos@fontana.org'; 'ypatanwala@fontana.org'; 'elewis@fontana.org'; 'tmiller@fontana.org'; 'csweet@fontana.org'; 'torah@assoc-eng.com'; 'cpursel@fontana.org'; 'rbragg@fontana.org; 'cnavarro@fontana.org'; 'ralphr@assoc-eng.com'; 'curti@assoc- eng.com'; 'eliasb@assoc-eng.com' Subject: South Highland Sewer Meeting Importance: High The Contractor for the South Highland Sewer, A.D. General Engineering Company, wants to make significant changes to the design. Yesterday I told him the City does not want to incorporate his changes (see my e-mail to him below) . His response to me is below, also. He has requested a meeting to discuss this with City Staff. Can the following please attend a meeting on Tuesday, July 16, at 2:00 in the DAB Conference Room? City: - Todd Miller - Yousuf or Felipe - Clyde or Eric - Carlos Navarro - Carla/Ray optional Associated Engineers: - Curt Ingraham - Elias Busuego - Ralph Roberts Please let Carla know if you can make it. I still feel we should stay with the plans as designed, but if the contractor is bringing up valid points we should hear them and then make a decision to settle this. The city recently approved $50 Million in bonds to improve the infrastructure, so (in my opinion) saving $50,000 isn't as important as building a sewer line which will meet its intended objectives. There was a separate meeting previously scheduled at the same time with Yousuf, Curt, Ralph, and me to discuss inspection proceudres on this project. Perhaps we four can stay and meet after the meeting with the contractor. Thank you, George Harvilla ********************************************************* From: ADGENENGR@aol.com [SMTP:ADGENENGR@aol.com] To: Harvilla@pbworld.com Cc: Subject: Re: Proposed Changes to Sewer Project Sent: 7/12/02 6:23 PM 1 y Importance: Normal George, I failed to make it known that the contract price for this job will go down with open cut saving the city $50,000.00. Also to bore I must get out on street anyway to pothole and then while boring I must stay on street until the bore passes by all substructures. I can have open cut done is less time than what it will take to bore, making the time out in traffic less time than a bore. Add this to a huge increase for future development which possibly makes the difference whether or not the land is developed, which would cost the city millions in revenue. At the design depth I would charge as a Sewer contractor an additional $15k- $18k on top of regular price for future tie-ins due to the depth, as will every contractor. Some will cut corners on shoring to install which with the type soil there may cause some worker their life, or possibly a cave in that would take the street with it thus closing it down until emergency repairs are made. This is what I see as very probable using my twenty-four years experience in this business. I think all this and more needs to be taken into consideration, as well as the owner of the land now and how the city's decision will impact the value of this land. If only 100 homes are affected by the depth at $15k a home increase that is $1.5 million dollars increase. What if it is 300-500 homes? This all needs to be mentioned and considered by the city. If it only hinges on the one service lateral this lateral can be concrete incased which is the industry standard for such a situation. A much better way to go I Believe as I think the present land owners will think so also. I see it as a win/win/win for all, especially the taxpayers. ********************************************************** From: Harvilla, George To: 'Scott Snyder' Cc: 'Ralph Roberts' ; 'Curt Ingraham' ; Todd Miller (tmiller@fontana.org) ; 'Tom Holliman' ; 'Carla Pursel' ; Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org) ; 'Cnavarro@fontana.org' Subject: Proposed Changes to Sewer Project Sent: 7/11/02 7:28 PM Importance: High July 11, 2002 Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Burbank, CA 91504 Dear Mr. Snyder, The City recently received a marked-up plan set for the South Highland Sewer showing contractor-proposed changes. The proposed changes are to raise the profile of the sewer along Juniper Avenue and South Highland Avenue, and to eliminate the borings under Sierra Avenue and South Highland Avenue. The profile was set by the designer to allow at least 6 feet of cover over the lateral serving the parcel at the southeast corner of Sierra/South 2 Highland. Your proposed changes would not place the line deep enough to effectively serve this parcel. Both Sierra Avenue and South Highland Avenue are very busy arterials. One of the objectives of this project is to install this sewer without closing these streets for trenching operations. The proposed changes are not approved. The City requests that you proceed to install the sewer at the depth(s) specified on the plans, and to bore where shown on the plans. Sincerely, George Harvilla Consultant Project Manager City of Fontana 3 RE: South Highland Sewer Meeting Page 1 of 5 Harvilla, George From: Eric Lewis [elewis@fontana.org] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 2:24 PM To: Harvilla, George Cc: Felipe Molinos; Clyde Sweet Subject: RE: South Highland Sewer George, as I recall, the boring under the two streets was proposed by the designer and we agreed with it in concept. We do not want to open cut Sierra Avenue because of the limited ability to move traffic over and the volumes. We might allow South Highland to be open cut if the contractor produces an acceptable method of traffic handling and he does not impede peak hour traffic. Also, Alex cannot attend the Tuesday meeting for the same reason, so let us know what is proposed and we can comment on Wednesday. Thanks, Eric Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:58 AM To: 'Eric Lewis ' Subject: RE: South Highland Sewer Meeting Eric, You do want the contractor to bore under Sierra and South Highland, right? George Original Message From: Eric Lewis To: 'Harvilla, George'; Carla Purse! Cc: Clyde Sweet; Alex Larson Sent: 7/15/02 9:41 AM Subject: RE: South Highland Sewer Meeting Neither Clyde, or myself, can attend the proposed meeting. We will be in Palm Desert on Tuesday for the ITE conference. I will ask Alex Larson if he can attend for our section. Thanks 7/16/2002 RE: South Highland Sewer Meeting Page 2 of 5 Eric Original Message From: Harvilla, George [ mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com <mailto:Harvilla(apbworld.com> ] • Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 6:30 PM To: 'fmolinos@fontana.org'; 'ypatanwala@fontana.org'; 'elewis@fontana.org'; 'tmiller@fontana.org'; 'csweet@fontana.org'; 'tomh@assoc-eng.com'; 'cpursel@fontana.org'; 'rbragg@fontana.org'; 'cnavarro@fontana.org'; 'ralphr@assoc-eng.com'; 'curti@assoc-eng.com'; 'eliasb@assoc-eng.com' Subject: South Highland Sewer Meeting Importance: High The Contractor for the South Highland Sewer, A.D. General Engineering Company, wants to make significant changes to the design. Yesterday I told him the City does not want to incorporate his changes (see my e-mail to him below). His response to me is below, also. He has requested a meeting to discuss this with City Staff. Can the following please attend a meeting on Tuesday, July 16, at 2:00 in the DAB Conference Room? City: - Todd Miller - Yousuf or Felipe - Clyde or Eric - Carlos Navarro - Carla/Ray optional Associated Engineers: - Curt Ingraham - Elias Busuego - Ralph Roberts Please let Carla know if you can make it. I still feel we should stay with the plans as designed, but if the contractor is bringing up valid points we should hear them and then make a decision to settle this. The city recently approved $50 Million in bonds to improve the infrastructure, so (in my opinion) saving $50,000 isn't as 7/16/2002 RE: South Highland Sewer Meeting Page 3 of 5 important as building a sewer line which will meet its intended objectives. There was a separate meeting previously scheduled at the same time with Yousuf, Curt, Ralph, and me to discuss inspection proceudres on this project. Perhaps we four can stay and meet after the meeting with the contractor. Thank you, George Harvilla ********************************************************* From: ADGENENGR@aol.com [SMTP:ADGENENGR@aol.com] To: Harvilla@pbworld.com Cc: Subject: Re: Proposed Changes to Sewer Project Sent: 7/12/02 6:23 PM Importance: Normal George, I failed to make it known that the contract price for this job will go down with open cut saving the city $50,000.00. Also to bore I must get out on street anyway to pothole and then while boring I must stay on street until the bore passes by all substructures. I can have open cut done is less time than what it will take to bore, making the time out in traffic less time than a bore. Add this to a huge increase for future development which possibly makes the difference whether or not the land is developed, which would cost the city millions in revenue. At the design depth I would charge as a Sewer contractor an additional $15k- $18k on top of regular price for future tie-ins due to the depth, as will every contractor. Some will cut corners on shoring to install which with the type soil there may cause some worker their life, or possibly a cave in that would take the 7/16/2002 RE: South Highland Sewer Meeting Page 4 of 5 street with it thus closing it down until emergency repairs are made. This is what I see as very probable using my twenty-four years experience in this business. I think all this and more needs to be taken into consideration, as well as the owner of the land now and how the city's decision will impact the value of this land. If only 100 homes are affected by the depth at $15k a home increase that is $1.5 million dollars increase. What if it is 300-500 homes? This all needs to be mentioned and considered by the city. If it only hinges on the one service lateral this lateral can be concrete incased which is the industry standard for such a situation. A much better way to go I Believe as I think the present land owners will think so also. I see it as a win/win/win for all, especially the taxpayers. ********************************************************** From: Harvilla, George To: 'Scott Snyder' Cc: 'Ralph Roberts'; 'Curt Ingraham'; Todd Miller (tmiller@fontana.org); 'Tom Holliman'; 'Carla Pursel'; Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org); 'Cnavarro@fontana.org' Subject: Proposed Changes to Sewer Project Sent: 7/11/02 7:28 PM Importance: High July 11, 2002 Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Burbank, CA 91504 7/16/2002 RE: South Highland Sewer Meeting Page 5 of 5 Dear Mr. Snyder, The City recently received a marked-up plan set for the South Highland Sewer showing contractor-proposed changes. The proposed changes are to raise the profile of the sewer along Juniper Avenue and South Highland Avenue, and to eliminate the borings under Sierra Avenue and South Highland Avenue. The profile was set by the designer to allow at least 6 feet of cover over the lateral serving the parcel at the southeast corner of Sierra/South Highland. Your proposed changes would not place the line deep enough to effectively serve this parcel. Both Sierra Avenue and South Highland Avenue are very busy arterials. One of the objectives of this project is to install this sewer without closing these streets for trenching operations. The proposed changes are not approved. The City requests that you proceed to install the sewer at the depth(s) specified on the plans, and to bore where shown on the plans. Sincerely, George Harvilla Consultant Project Manager City of Fontana 7/16/2002 Harvilla, George From: Elias busuego[eliasb@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:04 AM To: 'Harvilla, George'; 'fmolinos@fontana.org'; 'ypatanwala@fontana.org'; 'elewis@fontana.org'; 'tmiller@fontana.org'; 'csweet@fontana.org'; 'torah @assoc-eng.com'; 'cpursel@fontana.org'; 'rbragg@fontana.org'; 'cnavarro@fontana.org'; 'ralphr@assoc-eng.com'; 'curti@assoc- eng.com'; 'eliasb@assoc-eng.com' Subject: RE: South Highland Sewer Meeting I have discussed the contractor's issues with Curt Ingraham, our AE Construction Manager. The profile was set not only to allow at least 6 feet of cover over the lateral serving the parcel no. 240-121-21 (3rd lot, S/E of Sierra / South Highland, but also to maintain the slope required by the City. If we raise it up, it will affect the slope down through all the way to the intersection of Juniper Ave. and South Highland Ave. One of our objectives is to install this sewer without closing these streets in the area of micro- tunneling for trenching operations. I agree with George Harvilla on his recommendation. I hope this will clear up the issues and if you have any questions, please let me know and our staff about it. Thank you very much. Elias A. Busuego, Jr. II Associated Engineers, Inc. Assistant Engineer/Lead Designer Original Message From: Harvilla, George [SMTP:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 6:30 PM To: 'fmolinos@fontana.org' ; 'ypatanwala@fontana.org' ; 'elewis@fontana.org' ; 'tmiller@fontana.org' ; 'csweet@fontana.org' ; 'tomb@assoc-eng.com' ; 'cpursel@fontana.org' ; 'rbragg@fontana.org' ; 'cnavarro@fontana.org' ; 'ralphr@assoc-eng.com' ; 'curti@assoc- eng.com' ; 'eliasb@assoc-eng.com' Subject: South Highland Sewer Meeting The Contractor for the South Highland Sewer, A.D. General Engineering Company, wants to make significant changes to the design. Yesterday I told him the City does not want to incorporate his changes (see my e-mail to him below) . His response to me is below, also. He has requested a meeting to discuss this with City Staff. Can the following please attend a meeting on Tuesday, July 16, at 2:00 in the DAB Conference Room? City: - Todd Miller - Yousuf or Felipe - Clyde or Eric - Carlos Navarro - Carla/Ray optional Associated Engineers: - Curt Ingraham - Elias Busuego - Ralph Roberts Please let Carla know if you can make it. I still feel we should stay with the plans as designed, but if the contractor is bringing up valid points we should hear them and then make a decision to settle this. The city recently approved $50 Million in bonds to improve the infrastructure, so (in my opinion) saving $50,000 isn't as important as building a sewer line which will meet its intended 1 objectives. There was a separate meeting previously scheduled at the same time with Yousuf, Curt, Ralph, and me to discuss inspection proceudres on this project. Perhaps we four can stay and meet after the meeting with the contractor. Thank you, George Harvilla ********************************************************* From: ADGENENGR@aol.com [SMTP:ADGENENGR@aol.com] To: Harvilla@pbworld.com Cc: Subject: Re: Proposed Changes to Sewer Project Sent: 7/12/02 6:23 PM Importance: Normal George, I failed to make it known that the contract price for this job will go down with open cut saving the city $50,000.00. Also to bore I must get out on street anyway to pothole and then while boring I must stay on street until the bore passes by all substructures. I can have open cut done is less time than what it will take to bore, making the time out in traffic less time than a bore. Add this to a huge increase for future development which possibly makes the difference whether or not the land is developed, which would cost the city millions in revenue. At the design depth I would charge as a Sewer contractor an additional $15k- $18k on top of regular price for future tie-ins due to the depth, as will every contractor. Some will cut corners on shoring to install which with the type soil there may cause some worker their life, or possibly a cave in that would take the street with it thus closing it down until emergency repairs are made. This is what I see as very probable using my twenty-four years experience in this business. I think all this and more needs to be taken into consideration, as well as the owner of the land now and how the city's decision will impact the value of this land. If only 100 homes are affected by the depth at $15k a home increase that is $1.5 million dollars increase. What if it is 300-500 homes? This all needs to be mentioned and considered by the city. If it only hinges on the one service lateral this lateral can be concrete incased which is the industry standard for such a situation. A much better way to go I Believe as I think the present land owners will think so also. I see it as a win/win/win for all, especially the taxpayers. ********************************************************** From: Harvilla, George To: 'Scott Snyder' Cc: 'Ralph Roberts' ; 'Curt Ingraham' ; Todd Miller (tmiller@fontana.org) ; 'Tom Holliman' ; 'Carla Pursel' ; Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org) ; 'Cnavarro@fontana.org' Subject: Proposed Changes to Sewer Project Sent: 7/11/02 7:28 PM Importance: High 2 July 11, 2002 Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Burbank, CA 91504 Dear Mr. Snyder, The City recently received a marked-up plan set for the South Highland Sewer showing contractor-proposed changes. The proposed changes are to raise the profile of the sewer along Juniper Avenue and South Highland Avenue, and to eliminate the borings under Sierra Avenue and South Highland Avenue. The profile was set by the designer to allow at least 6 feet of cover over the lateral serving the parcel at the southeast corner of Sierra/South Highland. Your proposed changes would not place the line deep enough to effectively serve this parcel. Both Sierra Avenue and South Highland Avenue are very busy arterials. One of the objectives of this project is to install this sewer without closing these streets for trenching operations. The proposed changes are not approved. The City requests that you proceed to install the sewer at the depth(s) specified on the plans, and to bore where shown on the plans. Sincerely, George Harvilla Consultant Project Manager City of Fontana 3 Page 1 of 1 Harvilla, George From: ADGENENGR@aol.com Sent: Saturday,July 13, 2002 1:27 AM To: Harvilla, George Cc: ralphr@assoc-eng.com; curti @assoc- Subject: Re: South Highland Sewer Meeting Dear George: Thank You for getting back with me and for arranging for the meeting, I'll be there. This would benefit me of course but this will be a tremendous benefit for the City over the life of the new Sewer Main Line in several ways. Each time maintenance is performed the City will save money. The biggest reason though is the savings for future development which literally is in the millions of dollars, making the difference if and when these property's are built on. Also the safety factor which can never be truly known could prevent a tragedy. Because frankly more likely than not the contractors installing future laterals for such developments typically do not shore adequately. I say this by experience from seeing it as senior inspector of public works const. and as a contractor who is familiar with my competitors. I was looking at the plans and it would not be that much more cost to contract for me to run a new main from the lateral in question down Sierra Ave. To Walnut Ave. then down to tie in at M.H.#4 at Juniper.This would provide service for all those properties. I would be willing to design this probably at no cost and dependent upon what's encountered perhaps I could lower the price of installation as well.This is just a thought for the City to consider. Thanks again George for your efforts. Sincerely, Scott A. Snyder A.D. Gen. Engr. Const. Inc. 7/16/2002 Page 1 of 1 Harvilla, George From: ADGENENGR@aol.com Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 3:23 PM To: Harvilla@pbworld.com Subject: Re: Proposed Changes to Sewer George, I failed to make it known that the contract price for this job will go down with open cut saving the city$50,000.00. Also to bore I must get out on street anyway to pothole and then while boring I must stay on street until the bore passes by all substructures. I can have open cut done is less time than what it will take to bore, making the time out in traffic less time than a bore. Add this to a huge increase for future development which possibly makes the difference whether or not the land is developed, which would cost the city millions in revenue. At the design depth I would charge as a Sewer contractor an additional $15k-$18k on top of regular price for future tie-ins due to the depth, as will every contractor. Some will cut corners on shoring to install which with the type soil there may cause some worker their life, or possibly a cave in that would take the street with it thus closing it down until emergency repairs are made. This is what I see as very probable using my twenty-four years experience in this business. I think all this and more needs to be taken into consideration, as well as the owner of the land now and how the city's decision will impact the value of this land. If only 100 homes are affected by the depth at$15k a home increase that is$1.5 million dollars increase.What if it is 300-500 homes?This all needs to be mentioned and considered by the city. If it only hinges on the one service lateral this lateral can be concrete incased which is the industry standard for such a situation.A much better way to go I Believe as I think the present land owners will think so also. I see it as a win/win/win for all, especially the taxpayers. 7/16/2002 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Friday,July 12, 2002 6:56 PM To: 'adgenengr@aol.com' Cc: 'ralphr@assoc-eng.com'; 'Curti@assoc-eng.com'; 'cpursel@fontana.org' Subject: South Highland Sewer Meeting Dear Scott, I received your e-mail explaining why you want to make changes to the South Highland Sewer project. I have set up ameeting to discuss this with City Engineering Staff. It will be Tuesday, July 16, at 2:00 in the DAB Conference Room at Fontana City Hall. See you there. George Harvilla 1 Draft Letter to Sewer Contractor Page 1 of 2 Harvilla, George From: Todd Miller[tmiller@fontana.org] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 2:46 PM To: Clyde Sweet; Harvilla, George; Yousuf Patanwala; Carlos Navarro; Felipe Molinos; Eric Lewis; Carla Subject: RE: Draft Letter to Sewer Contractor George: As discussed earlier, the design of the sewer at the depths shown was determined by the property we need to serve with the sewer. Reducing the depth should not be allowed. Todd Original Message From: Clyde Sweet Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 1:25 PM To: 'Harvilla, George'; Todd Miller; Yousuf Patanwala; Carlos Navarro; Felipe Molinos; Clyde Sweet; Eric Lewis; Carla Pursel Subject: RE: Draft Letter to Sewer Contractor George: Allowing the contractor to change engineering work is not permitted. This should be referred to the project manager or the contract administrator. If it was a signal project, the boring is required unless several attempts fail. Not my call. Clyde Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 1:11 PM To: Todd Miller(tmiller@fontana.org); 'ypatanwala@fontana.org'; 'Cnavarro@fontana.org'; Felipe Molinos (fmolinos@fontana.org); 'csweet@fontana.org'; Eric Lewis (elewis@fontana.org); Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org) Subject: Draft Letter to Sewer Contractor Importance: High Hello Everyone, The contractor for the South Highland Sewer wants to change the sewer's profile and to eliminate two borings under busy streets. I feel the City should deny these requests, and my draft response is below. PLEASE GET BACK TO ME BY 4:00 TODAY IF YOU DO NOT AGREE WITH MY PROPOSED RESPONSE. I plan on e-mailing this letter to the contractor at 4:30 today. Thank You, George Harvilla Phone: 427-9169 7/11/2002 Draft Letter to Sewer Contractor Page 2 of 2 ************************************************ July 11, 2002 Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Burbank, CA 91504 Dear Mr. Snyder, The City recently received a marked up plan set for the South Highland Sewer showing contractor-proposed changes. The proposed changes are to raise the profile of the sewer along Juniper Avenue and South Highland Avenue, and to eliminate the borings under Sierra Avenue and South Highland Avenue. The profile was set by the designer to allow at least 6 feet of cover over the lateral serving the parcel at the southeast corner of Sierra/South Highland. Your proposed changes would not place the line deep enough to effectively serve this parcel. Both Sierra Avenue and South Highland Avenue are very busy arterials. One of the objectives of this project is to install this sewer without closing these streets for trenching operations. The proposed changes are not approved. The City requests that you proceed to install the sewer at the depth(s)specified on the plans, and to bore where shown on the plans. Sincerely, George Harvilla Consultant Project Manager City of Fontana 7/11/2002 Harvilla, George From: Curt Ingraham [curti@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 2:12 PM To: 'Harvilla, George' Subject: RE: Draft Letter to Sewer Contractor [Curt Ingraham] Looks fine to me, I reviewed the lateral location you referred to and concur with your letter. Curt 1 '1 Y,..i,le,{_ / / ,�/_/._,%,_.. & /, �� %f_.,___ _ _ ...c -tea _. _. i 1 fi v 11 ii t I..i1 N„a h i 4';3 S1 �I ' 11 i MIS 11 t,A,' I! 71 a , I • 11 :i I 1 II n"1 I Ark 1 Harvilla George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 4:09 PM To: 'Scott Snyder' Cc: 'Ralph Roberts'; 'Carla Pursel'; Carlos Navarro (cnavarro@fontana.org); 'Curt Ingraham' Subject: Business License/Excavation Permit Scott, A reminder that you will need to get a City Business License before you can get your Excavation Permit. A sign company is installing project identification signs at both ends of the project. They should finish by tomorrow at the latest. I observed some potholing today at the corner of Juniper/Walnut. George From: ADGENENGR@aol.com [mailto:ADGENENGR@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 2:05 PM To: tomh@assoc-eng.com Cc: Harvilla, George Subject: South Highland &Juniper Ave. Sewer Improvments-Your e-mail 6/28/02 I will need to perform work on Walnut as originally designed on plans. The potholing submittal traffic plan are you wanting me to describe my plan of operation using the WATCH hand book?Your not wanting actual drawings there's like 20 locations. • Regarding the M.H.'s submittals those are coming soon. How the installation will go is we will lay pipe and fall back once we have 3-4 ready.There will not be any open holes we backfill with pipe then re excavate. But I wont wait to submit. You want a temp fencing submittal?What do you want it to say? I was out there two separate day's most the day and did not see one person go by. I'll at the most have 50-60 feet of trench open at a time with crew laying pipe there. Following pipe laying is backfill and temp paving which is followed with us street sweeping.This keeps the street open right behind us which helps residents with access to driveway's and a cleaner job site. Construction Schedule, you should have received by mail the plans. I have to admit I just got my first computer, never used one before now and do not know how to make it work when I've tried scanning then sending a e-mail with a scan attachment. Sorry, I'm trying. I thought the schedule came out OK atleast. About the boring locations and potholing, you miss understood or I said it wrong. I am only potholing now. If I bore I was trying to explain that first the substructures must be measured for deepth and clearances prior to digging bore pits.Then when bore's are being made I have to re- digout the potholes exposing substructures completely.When the bore operation has safely past a substructure we backfill that hole then move to the next crossing of a substructure and re-dig that one, and so on and so on. I wanted to show I could open cut without anymore disruption to traffic than boring does. Usually can finish open cut across a lot faster than boring, often times twice as fast as a bore. So I simply potholing the whole job then I'll start at Walnut and Cypress and lay low to high the entire job. Thanks for giving your pager number if I had Questions over weekend. How about when your in Japan I may want to page you to ask how the weather is over there, will you call me back?Ya, probably call collect and wont even use 1-800-collect to save me money. I have finished the plans revisions for my request to open cut. I starts at M.H.# 5 out invert all the way to the end. Eliminating the bore's allowed the pipe depth to be much uniform throughout. As far as a traffic plan if my plan is acceptable I pay for one to be drawn up then, there's no money for one not used. And Traffic is next to nothing my son pulling in and out of my driveway is more traffic than out there. Maybe I'm at the wrong location? Only kidding there. f+ Hey feel free to call me at home/mobile phone any day any time if you have a question or an idea for the job. Have a GREAT 4th of JULY!!! God Bless. SCOTT A. SNYDER A.D. GEN. ENGR. CONST. INC. P.S.- I got you on your use of the word "MAN" hole. About eight years ago this was officially changed to eliminate gender referencing. The official federal,state, green book proper description is maintenance Hole, M.H. Page 1Of1 Harvilla' George __ From: AOGENENGR@ao|.cmm Sent: Monday,July O1. 2UU2 2:27 To: Hun/ ba, George Highland sewer Gote-mail. I called in USA and it takes effect on tue. afternoon.Want to pot hole wed. morn.Thats all can do untill notices k; |n effect. | will ba using the provided traffic p|anoinceafte[|ookjDQatoiteagainitnnua1beshutdowO. aamhginu|k/thought. From Scott. •f: Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 11:28 AM To: 'cnavarro@fontana.org'; 'fmolinos@fontana.org'; Carla Pursel (E-mail) Subject: FW: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements- Shop Drawings and Proposed Changes Importance: High FYI Original Message From: Tom Holliman fmailto:tomh@assoc-eng.coml Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 11:17 AM To: adgenengr@aol.com Cc: George Harvilla (E-mail); "Ralph Roberts"; "Curt Ingraham" Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements-Shop Drawings and Proposed Changes Importance:High We have received your faxed shop drawing submittal for the subject project. The format is not acceptable. Please provide four(4) copies of each submittal package, each submittal must be wet stamped and signed by AD General. We will review the submittals and return one set with our stamp and comments. Given that the contract period will begin on Monday, July 1, 2002 we urge you to provide the following submittals to avoid delays to the project. 1. Revised traffic control plan -at the pre-construction meeting you indicated that you felt you could construct the project without closing Walnut Avenue. Please be advised that if you intend to deviate from the plan in the project plans and specifications you must submit that plan before it is needed in the field. Further it must stamped and sealed by a registered traffic engineer. Please submit four copies of your final traffic control plan. Also, you must provide a submittal for the traffic control plan for the setup for potholing, rolling lane closure. That plan can simply reference the WATCH handbook if that's your intent. 2. Please provide the submittals for the pre-cast manhole sections, sewer frames and grade rings, and the formal submittal mentioned above for the pipe. In addition concrete mix if you're pouring the manhole bases, or a submittal on the precast manhole bottoms if that's what you're intending to use. We also need the submittal for the temporary fencing along Walnut. 3. We also need your schedule, either Microsoft Project, or Primavera. 4. In reference to our discussion regarding deleting the borings at Sierra, please be advised that this deviation from the plans must be submitted to Associated Engineers for review and approval for design, then submitted to the City for their review and approval, specifically traffic. If A-E and the City concur that the deviation is acceptable from an engineering and construction/traffic perspective a change order providing a credit to the City for deleting these items and potentially raising the depth of the sewer must be approved before the changes can be implemented in the field. Given that you are considering installing the pipe during the potholing operations, and those operations are set to commence next week, it is imperative that you submit the proposed changes immediately. Further as a friendly reminder, you will not be allowed to deviate from the plans without that approval and risk being stopped if any attempt is made to install the pipe in an alignment or grade inconsistent with the approved plans during potholing. And any and all impacts to the project schedule will be your sole responsibility. We will attempt to expedite our review of your proposal to allow the City to consider this potential cost saving change and ask that you work with us to get the information we need to make our recommendation to the City. We appreciate your efforts to • reduce costs and we will have staff standing by to review the package when it comes in. If you have any technical questions please call me directly at (909) 980-1982, or you can page me at(909)482-6058 over the weekend and I'll get back to you as quickly as possible. July 11, 2002 Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Burbank, CA 91504 Dear Mr. Snyder, The City recently received a marked up plan set for the South Highland Sewer showing contractor-proposed changes. The proposed changes are to raise the profile of the sewer along Juniper Avenue and South Highland Avenue, and to eliminate the borings under Sierra Avenue and South Highland Avenue. The profile was set by the designer to allow at least 6 feet of cover over the lateral serving the parcel at the southeast corner of Sierra/South Highland. Your proposed changes would not place the line deep enough to effectively serve this parcel. Both Sierra Avenue and South Highland Avenue are very busy arterials. Once of the objectives of this project was to install this sewer without closing these streets for trenching. The proposed changes are not approved. The City requests that you proceed to install the sewer at the depth(s) specified on the plans, and to bore where shown on the plans. ., Sincerely, George Harvilla Consultant Project Manager City of Fontana Hr�il�a, ..... From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 1:30 PM To: Scott Snyder(adgenengr@aol.com) Cc: 'Ray Bragg'; 'Paul Balbach'; Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org); 'rsandoval @fontana.org'; 'Felipe Molinos'; 'ypatanwala@fontana.org'; 'Steve Nawar'; 'Eric Lewis; 'csweet@fontana.org';Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com); 'cnavarro@fontana.org'; 'bwaddell@socalgas.com'; 'ralphr@assoc-eng.com'; 'curti@assoc-eng.com' Subject: Notice To Proceed Importance: High • June 27,2002 Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Burbank, CA 91504 Dear Mr. Snyder: This is your Official Notice to Proceed with construction of the Walnut/Juniper/South Highland Sewer in accordance with Bid No. SP-46-02. The contract has been executed by the City Manager. You are required to begin construction within 10 days of this NTP. The City would appreciate any steps you could take to begin construction as soon as possible. Please call me at(909)427-9166 if you have any questions. Sincerely, George Harvilla Consultant Project Manager City of Fontana F F THE_c. 'x 7w7�rill - moo\: Cityof Fontana . .-r.,, . ,. . .il ter- = CALIFORNIA : .,., ulirrr: `� C N44;A C Ay% MM... June 24, 2002 Robert L. and Nellie F. Young 6817 Juniper Avenue Fontana, California, 92336 RE: APN: 0240-091-44 Walnut Street to Juniper Avenue to South Highland Avenue Sewer Improvements (SB-46-02) Road Closure Dear Resident/Property Owner: This summer, the City of Fontana will be constructing sewer improvements along Walnut Street, Juniper Avenue, and South Highland Avenue. It has been deemed necessary to close Walnut Street between Sierra Avenue and Cypress Avenue for periods lasting up to several weeks between July 8 and July 26, 2002; and Juniper Avenue between Walnut Street and South Highland Avenue for periods lasting up to several weeks between July 15 and August 15, 2002. , A detour will be provided to help area residents avoid the construction site. All emergency vehicles will be provided access to these areas at all times. The Contractor's working hours will be limited from 7:00 AM to 4:00 PM, Monday through Friday. Please recognize that construction sites can be dangerous to visitors. The City strongly recommends that parents take special care to keep small children away from the construction activities at all times. www.fontana.org 8353 SIERRA AVENUE FONTANA, CALIFORNIA 92335-3528 (909) 350-7600 A r nvr•.lvr!sumer June 24, 2002 Page2of2 It is the City's sincere desire to accomplish this construction with a minimum of inconvenience to the area's residents and businesses. Please contact the undersigned at (909) 427-9166 if you have any questions with respect to the construction activities in the field or if you need any additional information. Thank you very much for your cooperation as we construct this very important project, to improve the. City's infrastructure. Respectfully, REDEVELOPMENT & SPECIAL PROJECTS DEPARTMENT- Special Projects Division 74/ /1/a-4''"':-Ie George Harvilla Consultant Project Manager Special Projects cc: Redevelopment/Special Projects Director Community Development Director City Engineer City Traffic Engineer Senior Civil Engineer/Land Development 'THE x� '1 irp=ri 7. o\. City of Fontana =; -101111 A .litAli: = CALIFORNIA • r --A CA r�' -0-:.°sL- June 24, 2002 Adelaide J. Howell 6831 Juniper Avenue Fontana, California, 92336 RE: APN: 0240-091-46 Walnut Street to Juniper Avenue to South Highland Avenue Sewer Improvements (SB-46-02) Road Closure Dear Resident/Property Owner: • This summer, the City of Fontana will be constructing sewer improvements along Walnut Street, Juniper Avenue, and South Highland Avenue. It has been deemed necessary to close Walnut Street between Sierra Avenue and Cypress Avenue for periods lasting up to several weeks between July 8 and July 26, 2002; and Juniper Avenue between Walnut Street and South Highland Avenue for periods lasting up to several weeks between July 15 and August 15, 2002. A detour will be provided to help area residents avoid the construction site. All emergency vehicles will be provided access to these areas at all times. The Contractor's working hours will be limited from 7:00 AM to 4:00 PM, Monday through Friday. Please recognize that construction sites can be dangerous to visitors. The City strongly recommends that parents take special care to keep small children away from the construction activities at all times. www.fontana.org 8353 SIERRA AVENUE FONTANA, CALIFORNIA 92335-3528 (909) 350-7600 et recycled paper • June 24, 2002 Page 2 of 2 It is the City's. sincere desire to accomplish this. construction with a minimum of inconvenience to the area's residents and businesses. Please contact the undersigned at (909) 427-9166 if you have any questions with respect to the construction activities in the field or if you need any additional information. Thank you very much for your cooperation as we construct this very important project to improve the • City's infrastructure. Respectfully, REDEVELOPMENT & SPECIAL PROJECTS DEPARTMENT Special Projects Division George Harvilla Consultant Project Manager Special Projects cc: Redevelopment/Special Projects Director Community Development Director City Engineer City Traffic Engineer Senior Civil Engineer/Land Development THE Itl k o� City of Fontana may- '"1 .,., 0/4-in, L - � CALIFORNIA � Y i�,� fVq7.1 CAti ,,;,,,,. Ow,,,. June 24, 2002 Cleo L. Patterson 6835 Juniper Avenue Fontana, California, 92336 RE: APN: 0240-091-47 Walnut Street to Juniper Avenue to South Highland Avenue Sewer Improvements (SB-46-02) Road Closure Dear Resident/Property Owner: This summer, the City of Fontana will be constructing sewer improvements along Walnut Street, Juniper Avenue, and South Highland Avenue. It has been deemed necessary to close Walnut Street between Sierra Avenue and Cypress Avenue for periods lasting up to several weeks between July 8 and July 26, 2002; and Juniper Avenue between Walnut Street and South Highland Avenue for periods lasting up to several weeks between July 15 and August 15, 2002. A detour will be provided to help area residents avoid the construction site. All emergency vehicles will be provided access to these areas at all times. The Contractor's working hours will be limited from 7:00 AM to 4:00 PM, Monday through Friday. Please recognize that construction sites can be dangerous to visitors. The City strongly recommends that parents take special care to keep small children away from the construction activities at all times. www.fontana.org 8353 SIERRA AVENUE FONTANA, CALIFORNIA 92335-3528 (909) 350-7600 rar•.vclwd Hann June 24,2002 Page2of2 It is the City's sincere desire to accomplish this construction with a minimum of inconvenience to the area's residents and businesses. Please contact the undersigned at (909) 427-9166 if you have any questions with respect to the construction activities in the field or if you need any additional information. Thank you very much for your cooperation as we construct this very important project to improve the City's infrastructure. Respectfully, REDEVELOPMENT & SPECIAL PROJECTS DEPARTMENT Special Projects Division George Harvilla Consultant Project Manager Special Projects cc: Redevelopment/Special Projects Director Community Development Director City Engineer City Traffic Engineer Senior Civil Engineer/Land Development T \A 7 I . '''' '\ City of Fontana -.I riiiffik) " ; ' = CALIFORNIA -:','"IVitli "ill$P-7/i 1 \P-I- iiK41%,4:4". 7 4 ‘,74 CAtiI %,,,,- I���,��,,, '',.. June 24, 2002 John L. & Ernestine Ashley 6807 Juniper Avenue , Fontana, California, 92336 RE: APN: 0240-091-45 Walnut Street to Juniper Avenue to South Highland Avenue Sewer Improvements (SB-46-02) Road Closure Dear Resident/Property Owner: This summer, the City of Fontana will be constructing sewer improvements along Walnut Street, Juniper Avenue, and South Highland Avenue. It has been deemed necessary to close Walnut Street between Sierra Avenue and Cypress Avenue for periods lasting up to several weeks between July 8 and July 26, 2002; and Juniper Avenue between Walnut Street and South Highland Avenue for periods lasting up to several weeks between July 15 and August 15, 2002. A detour will be provided to help area residents avoid the construction site. All emergency vehicles will be provided access to these areas at all times. The Contractor's working hours will be limited from 7:00 AM to 4:00 PM, Monday through Friday. Please recognize that construction sites can be dangerous to visitors. The City strongly recommends that parents take special care to keep small children away from the construction activities at all times. www.fontana.org 8353 SIERRA AVENUE FONTANA, CALIFORNIA 92335-3528 (909) 350-7600 Pi recycled saner • June 24, 2002 Page 2 of 2 It is the City's sincere desire to accomplish this construction with a minimum of inconvenience to the area's residents and businesses. Please contact the undersigned at (909) 427-9166 if you have any questions with respect to the construction activities in the field or if you need any additional information. Thank you very much for your cooperation as we construct this very important project to improve the City's infrastructure. Respectfully, REDEVELOPMENT & SPECIAL PROJECTS DEPARTMENT Special Projects Division George Harvilla Consultant Project Manager Special Projects cc: Redevelopment/Special Projects Director Community Development Director City Engineer City Traffic Engineer Senior Civil Engineer/Land Development I rr ., fl,I I .._........ . I,..,... — - 1 ' h 1 c4 Le, A /9r.fo 4. ./..3-.0-e..... — !II 11:1 ...... _ [! , j'',1 fOr.V dole 41. ---.........-... '-- . i 1 1 i,1, ip,.,_,..ti• A h/e....1 --------------------t, . -- ,.....?—/Isri CI . .. ...... _.. _ „,J , 1 ____ -4, 1—..-• .. _ . _ ._ _ _____ 1 „ , • ._ - _ _______. ____ il 1 1: 1 ,,1 ______ _ —---4 H -----------_. II!1 I .1'I f,rr 1 --. — . - --- ----... il 1 i 1r il i -----------_— if ...r_...1 1 r. f __--------..----_----------_—_--_________------.---_____—_ II 11 I 11 ri I II r i d'.. II 1'I — -- _____--------._ I, 'I • . i I II .1 360networks(USA)in 12101 Airport Way Please roomfield,Colorado Co 80021 Need Co 1 eS' (t) ,5. p (fl 303303$54 854.5079000 www.360.net roeCopies To o� .: • FrG.ti..Q She Cl nt'bc etc&vw WIC-1k f L��p To,lolDir.it,r.! ell A Ri 'FirZt. Yovisuf 6,,,„ networks f ( I f e 641 r (Z �i May 14, 2002 .Original: v ,❑ Return to: > V hr ,t,c(r, .. • ❑ File under: v Q� �' 1 �/`,�/v Mr. Carlos Navarro ❑ vi) City of Fontana. Post-Ifm copy request pad 7670 , ``r, _ '`„I - / 8353 Sierra Avenue \ \VA`V Fontana, CA 92335 RE: Notification of ownership of conduit, fiber and associated equipment in California. Dear Mr. Navarro: Please be advised that 360networks (USA) inc. ("360") either owns or possesses an Indefeasible Right of Use("IRU") in the following conduit, fiber and associated equipment: 1 fiber optic cable encased in an HDPE innerduct lying within an existing underground duct bank, as shown in Exhibit A(Duct Bank Occupation), in an alignment through your jurisdiction as shown on the attached map(s) Exhibit B (Fiber.Optic Alignment Map). These assets were acquired by 360 as a result of three agreements with GST Telecom Inc. (now Time Warner Telecom Inc.) executed in 1999 and 2000, which were then modified twice in 2001 (the "Agreements"). The Agreements are voluminous and confidential so I cannot provide them to you. Bills of sale were never provided to 360 for these assets, however, the Agreements provide for 360's title to these assets (or grant of an IRU) either through 360's acceptance and use of the asset without objection . or through settlement. The foregoing statements are of my own personal knowledge and are true and correct. 360networks USA) inc. 0 i� Bob oyeson, - C National Right of Way Manager cf< IT Direct: (303) 854-5132 i Enclosures '( ' v , ; ‘C--&i1 cy>-' , t ( l' Exhibit A: Duct Bank Occupation* • '{ . f •* E Existingrt tn � I ka z.. _ g j4 a : : ; te lea a i YA 1rr Vf * `9%p,�FT�', . M7� ') ,vim..—A :faux A s.? F. - :c .s{,. . �, ._1, aY ?• y p v C • *Shown for reference only. 360networks (USA) inc. makes no representations that the other companies listed above own or occupy the conduit shown, as of the current date. • • • a,��vsr l5'Yk i ` .r v gs C,i '4 i \� _.:.,� ■. I� / J Y q$ay'I.. S rtt A t m�•r'"U+! >�F • FFi.0' a�G ','ci t x /-: 1 f -^ 1rr y" *ter, ��• _ `+ • 1 'AN ZJif S f�•1!`-r '+ram'` a ,,,.aa�� 1 t rk z_ S.. _ • ,• x1 r it i j 3,p��`�sy.E J 14A4 r b '')«u,."',"' ` ---r J \ J/ I J ',:'4 to��ty r " ,2b<vy/p 'A C" .Y"h 4 g� _ >,� •• `�../ I 51 j� �O r 4 y' Y y', 1, O�� `zi5 -,,,5 ..4 t4.e';a111•Y•I!0•,' a f1•0 1 ' ;:i: i,,!„,,. 1 .9 "z r .d, 4t•$ ,t, i �i:'t 441.?`` . . 3:;r .}4,01 i: err uy }ro S 2, d e ;ai," 53•% i� :;h.,;F';"r� a u a Poj Yk t;; -,y .'4.. .4,54.:fl' .h utV k. �:: et:'; :'l,_ f.,,,,y�:. ,,- _ y& Yf }<.}. •a. kv 4i a`,. 'i 1` t f yt r � t x} ! i,Z• e/qr �. `'�s e,yCt 1 9r+'''t tt t s /i 4 i .tit yir,R 3rtx Q "y.. �`_ e r� /, / .'�` y A.x sf i'?'^ s'^l,ar .'a��."�„`` iVo^S•yx i ti,- r N .5 r g.i- ag','V.l i t ,Wa y'W,`.° zrly s 1k lip i.',:ts.. a '4.4. i" '', ,1§,:d E 4,4 C 3y .,N4 q tK Sf-,xC k 1 ,•i';*�,. r-. >a -N��e41� key �- kr..}r�"� h • `t.S 4 , y r vt elegra• Peak 8985 • 3 ..0,zlr. +�-- -`i•ri, fx . .: ?ik c�}a},,. ,Lytle Creek y ,�-0'r j Sugarpipe Mountalna5478 t' S_ . • .a ,� *v 1 r y 'f4 y tJ < t °t (.r:t;tt.•a nr,7:.ca ,, > �a ''te'2Sy`v PLI,..• 7z rR �4 f,T, !,,o A t s e an,Yx v"y'tV '3' a +r ''t aye. t h r t �,7 t r >, ,,.x t i •`:'.'I34 15 is I`�' Y-'. ;`� ` , �x; - ►, •' ;Fiber-Optic-Alignment °' Ce�arpines P, rk; ,x 5 v .Y°�,s t;n` h �a r i, ?+iz � 1 +' -•,■ ,` .ta- •' 1z0.l Peak 5388' ., ,i< .-a Tian tr` { .,, „ rScotland f • CucamongatWildemess , F " ; ` ,. .s tizc r r :� �,r„p v a h` e r 'r.:x'` zUs� v '" .�f Ca 1 +*sail • :,'"". �y 2.. `S°4 x`ti5 8c*ix y " { /ate,. .. .. 4 y` `, �« .`S ?4 ? .� ?� c,t�,d° �izf r,�a/ 's;-�r; �f tr :r' .�s I� �`��1 Tokay Hill 256D'; li? r`^,, '1 a ,r ,, ..L a dy I .'[ttit•e;T :c.•},S`t• ,� '{. :d tzCR"ti^t '�34. '� � t �. -iyi '� i`Y }�a a r }Sx E i� �. ■ 54 a; >t r ;� s' t.;Cucamonga Peaki8859 r r .t ` .. �., 04 `i cr a>r r :.>Naf o a(naoaest' 4s °.\ Si Y �frj+ :,� NI, iiu� y k �1 tip r' / + s. x` t itsoTFa. 'i "t8'xa iz 4' ,T.i�� t«,>' y„r,�9 ;k4�". ';1. . ' *, y ^, • A Fiber Optic Alignment '; f t ' a ri /a ',• `--•� \'s a a •/.. 20Y' Y§ -.t. �+ .rc k' C S ►:•` Ve de oitak ` .„,..3,4,,,,,,, ,:,,,, ,f,,,,,,,,, • • am ...,,,:M'.r.., y,kaxe awsr+.*) 3.v mnnx:wi v uw. once«......ms, n«wxw .,1 wn„nenumeuw ■. "/";N:4. k'''''*‘'k‘,:' ' r "5 4�1'r'•"l'... .2::::4 Li NS 10 ,x.,-• '�;V `7::. AtWg Y r c3 $w ti[ �; i '7i "} N j E Lytle Creek Wash 144. ❑r' , g 1 cy • '� �+r" 4d � $ I�� M y'' ' ` M �15 Itw. x, " �� fi t: ' ',•. FL'J4} b.'s 'I�', 'TIT, ;y%'.1 v. f Y a �s ai s ,, rhj �i id * � " t gip a's - ` t ' - em4 r aa, � o, ifry • ` �' 4b4B. a 1 ��41,..-.aRr� g y �.' 'n a; t itit � h , L' ,f ' iit` 'E «ta• p nai:°��'� eF r• d y t id $ ,,p '�'N n,x. 4 y� lt'+r��2 � z F a 'n L fi ,� 4 �?,^ ""'� �ss � �� ;,•y ry�'T • ,a,"�� aM a '� r r`.� .� r +'M1, ,�i� � �3. '��' 4 is@o c t r7.�` �` • �t � y'. �;§W§Graeas 7 _ - -,r j, ,*e�;� 'Qa � 5'; ,L�i�_ M tY:. i� t � kg ors lo, 4 e40go' t", .4 ry.-,..- 4u� 1 �'�f3,1401u Fontana " 3+k Y rays" L l hn •,tt�,� .. :..�s t_ u S t' W�+ �p 8 s• it ■, +�'r $" a t .I �F 1. 1�f ''- 3 vw'�r,- ,'i { �z 'N .k ':`Fe +.r�o�aF P rSr;''t"a' �YW+lgir r' s;440 � , f' At 1p 4 g Ls�� �.•t a per r"Y�,i;%• :,•,, �rRal s �1 �x;.s'•'L.',,v8 77 �°.ite A 1,,, ,1 i, }'"i, wyy";,$, „y1t • .Y -: I' '•.5 . ' 4 ,''''':s ggfa...':,'41 1 Gucamon•a: ❑ : ,,... r t • N R t�l ' �iZtalto r.�;•ra ,m � ax' inn Rgi3w°a7 h, t 4` i` rWFAI,�f�',1"f1TMTM/z ltT !'�i F L ! r "44 •d' End•S• acramento-Ontario "�� era e "6 P. 4 c �• � a.s'RIN �s• t�Gl�l 9a n9 'h am t •c e e li ' adi rr,,r,ssrr�ss+i ppgpl .M., x :. k o f g • , o, r f r✓vg � �'� at l m's�0h Y l * a 4� � f 'mil" s o a s,,ilir� ���a� Rana 3 5 ?'�� � �xl}� �� 4t� k �� .� x I c -; may �I 4. t V'o-• ?r,�i5 «i 1.'.ArViet itFii LY.'u� A°ar �1 MI • g" � 't''9 t""r«�v9 t 3 k Or.c e. t � c mertsgr . 1a :. .� �.` • • wti �s 'a ��t< F.iberOpticAlignment t�`�k " 9 �:v:',4 � � Coto•", } S i _. 1,%; l� .. 6ct'. !.§iar 00 td ngt0 _, `:" r to � 1,5. ■ ■g/'O Fe' �19 f` i ,•n p r I ro I 1 as ❑ c ■■ 1 Q „�i�i n 60 o .,■ 63A i ,wF s if West CoR,nk �Y OA rae eaz p eg pn: t�f o, - „n i,; `., tyi�a�ii, ,1sb.."sg f5IBEA,,..,6r'nmj,Sol .r Ff alk'v g�vfi+t'f s '� {s".`� S ' ,Stover o ntai:1280`69 6 ■' ,., ,-y m x,Al e ,,yy `4 t, Asa S k" t �3 d. ' e..- tr 4+ r •• . ',.pit ..o • ���.'y., ,fir' y,-i .- I�y� �y Lid A '"� >,dd,k Y1 Naga:"isc.,&,,a :'I. ^v"�, y,?'' +,;' p c fir' d , "" ,f' u , A, '".@h W V eYi. ,.asr :'3 K S C;k A'N$'L'. t�>o39 .�� 4'4 "v R1R L, .: - „' s A$ville Gres o e.1: , . o.w ;+ , • i f u h,,.} t �� R. . 1�e411,417440 ,;a �- „1,,,,,,,,... t. o '�°+tl�,•,. S t a°• 5Y,,,,„" 4, /�S,h 2 �`� ' ire'+ , / } )J ,V ,1«,#r`t'' • S K o '-tki t v". ,�,.,-0 ii � • a a agne .A„a `" , ;, Gran f K'l'e race ' "t'mY°t," °& �1;r'd"�`y i ot„I i i ' }+ a t+ ^rs atfF ru•a 221 I .''- v 0 a"ro '' 3�,-38❑8 t�r£■ l B',t rg�'ii! ■, I 06 +, -. 1 T� r tr ;r.�t. a ,r ° $ `,. 147,,,..R, ' r 7 4• a 'f.` 1 11Rt f■ ■ ..II.I..h' 1 :/ 'f f.S. . Y i B T 'S c i e {a x ■r•am■ ,uueglyi; i t ll s /,, r, r,. � r i t g�+7B : t e ; n ��a dae.� .■. ■ s, • a 4' . ' I9 grove 110 1it •. i 11106 >P� � ,,:' �sr y ° and „, A to , _ .,y Cup • tiamp I' 611 ` •Il a t ( ?`4. ,`*i t'`p i r 35`iMou,�•ai 19,4,�4 • s. aTufia n`' { -y� 5�,k, Flabob j� .�■i 3 B, " Sr'� Z uc°• 1i.Sa ' IV 'fr ' � ' *1 ''',4 399r'::,v,"o A' ,, ,t Rltverstde J is o�t • o :w '3 '« '�'1 4 q�?a a ."$v''@a F'hcBeNe•ere, elghts+'6 Chino �� j 03 pr$ � r ' r r `<• ggfrit6a `�rzy iZl,Vetsl, try +'c1�,Trest a t 1,r n " ,, f ' ,r&a ., ` t s ."1,Can o t rest He ghts a:I 103 t '0,1$4 a r a,f z i r j�.& ` a�d3❑33 , r k4, J,_..:«� e Oda ...; 1,4 rt" i9.k . ' 4. , z )J,�,,rY4" vt k '.t3F # ;a3"sar i«tv�",� s o7,,4 3 Lt (.".g.t . ,- :L' " 414\ t d' ,.,41,W i X,.:Y 4 ;5;;z Ai.' °.: ."ft'1ft Y..' ,,,. n, a \..�5.,'N. .• n I imi m 2000 DeLorme.XAiap Business;®2000 GDT,Inc,Rel.04/2000 Scale:1:162,500 Zoom Level:10-0 Datum:WGSS4 360networks(USA)in 12101 Airport Way Broomfield,Colorado 80021 • (t)303.854.5000 (f)303.854.5079 •wwwu.360.net • • C. 'networks n • • OFFICIAL CONTACT/ADDRESS OF RECORD: Please note that our address indicated above has changed. All official correspondence, notifications, etc. should be mailed to the following new address: 360networks (USA) inc. Attn. Bob Boyeson, • National Right-of-Way Manager 12202 Airport Way, Suite 300 • Broomfield, CO 80021 Office: (303).854-5000 Fax: (303) 854-5100 • • TECHNICAL CONTACTS: In the event of an emergency, or any other urgent maintenance or technical issues, with regard to the underground cable or associated equipment, please contact:. "' ice, '" d z ..sa ..S."''s 4 �'r•na r`� T I x 1 0*�r� tC-a iru;'ero>tetrOc 7 D l .g x�ib��-� tree g�enc�, � f, 3��erge�ncy�Cdntac� � � f • ��9 S "�, � �+7 S§ felvw k Lu y F ''"P a^TZ 'gat f 4GQICI'ItrG°' y .� ,,44 ...�.., io,,F.4f. ;"��"�.�rzF . �'ttmi. 10w x" xs. 1`�M' k'25� .r 4r ya_- 3 v �. Kevin Wooten In the event of an One Call Locates: 360networks (USA) inc.. emergency, please 2100 Marx Way, # 5 call: (800) 227-2600 Anderson, CA 96007 (604) 648-7900 Office.:(530) 378-2989 Cell: (303) 378-0097 - — ' , • - .,r , , . .• : : 1 i . , • • , • .. •• •••,„ ' ',„.• r • f. ,f. • . • , , • ••••1 1 •. , . : 1 ' r • L r • • . 1 . ., ... : : •,,,..ri-r-••", :V ' ,,_* -, -•,,7-•••••: •-•111, . ,, ' ,, • r ' ••' . i '' J ••:, •1 L., . ••• : • . . , '. • M . ,. i . ••'' . 1 . , . . ‘ • V,„• . • • •••• * • E r R . L . r . ' • . A-•;"• •• . :. •••1::;„•••r• Tr• :•: .'.:••••'• C••' A• •r f , • ‘' II r . • ,: 1,. 4 Lr 4 • ' 1,,.A.,...',,•• :rif;'!:,... l. • , •-, • •:., .•.•,' f• .„ ,1•• ,;•.:,:'.;:',,,„, ,,., , r, " ••' IL: • 2. • ' ::• •i:.1111111.. ...g 1 • ,,, ' • Tvi TEp' R• . . • -,,iiiki... . i , \ - ‘ _ . . 4, . ,. . ___,. - gs,,L -,... . ,...; - . . _.„. • - — .• 1 . . „_ .. It :. ' ' - • ' - . . '- . I ' . ''- .: ,'..r-' • :, : 1, , • 1• i •• . • • \ •: : . • • '. „• .. • • f 4i. - •••• r:- . •: .•• :•••;,ON:„T' AN:f • r', ' rr.••' '••.• ': :•• r 1 .M ' f 1 • • 1 \ •„: ..: f• ._ ., „, , • , ••••__ •••.•1 , I f . , ..•• • • 4 ' • ' • ', r• .. : 10 . _ •, . . •• ., „-, ,. ...„ .1i1 :: . '-'' ''' PROGRAM .,.iii. ,,.,111..,,,.., 11..,.R . „. . , . N. Nttairit, ;11 ,! :::„.,Mirki .. . , : '' i• D ' - lit i .- il.., k . ' " '' * • e ill, il 'JiiPIrtbef i _ ' ' . - . . ' : ' ', :r • ••••, : •1 , If t '1111 DIN 01.: : r ; ,.•• : 7"'':•rr ••'•• •:r '•• f• 'r'•:f'' l' 7•••' '''';:'• •' • . • ; 1 . EC ' • - - -.. i . , ... . Janice.. -14.,... -, . erts . , : . . . . . , . {,::, : :, ,' i.,.:.:,...::',. ..':' ,..ikk ,....n:.. :R::.1.1-,,:'..t,...11:' e.iirli..14311t:',:::j i . . • : •1' :' A:' ' ' ' ' • ''.. ' • '. 're 4 1 II n c 1 l' )112TEI "Ir. . • . " „ : . ' ,-, ' Pro' . 0 ''' .: — - •,- . ' - - : ' - , - • ,• :i , : :. - -. 1 . . .. , • e_ R. 'Eli: :Hu- n,ty,,,,, , -__ . 4..,k,,,,,... i . . i , 4- •-' o ' 1 • , • .. •1, ..•••11'.: fil: '', ,,:.• i• :••••. •• le1111• : :: ,-• • : • •• •• •' ' .:‘•,'• f'•' •%:::." •• ' •:.7:•:,i • ••• • f ,-...,,..,,,, ',,i',4,,,,,,, + ,; „ • •..r. . . .• _ . • : r f-: 1 ••. ', . I, ••'i:l• :L.:'. ' :: .''.: '":' ':'..7 r: . : '7.'17 i t iv,: lortgagar. :...,I.r..,, ,.. ::,r f,:•,5:'.•:1air. 7::;;;' 1 • 1;€1 r,i,i• %, • •••.:', • ••'' ,4. ' ••••.f •• •, '..f 1 ,. :: • :• ., ••. •‘, 'f;:•::::',',,,, ef';=•,,,4,•• I . : • • :: • : • ••,•4* •••:.1'.•f.'34,' ' ' ' •r:I .lit lip •:,... t. • . . - ,.. : , , •.. : ' . . r '•' ' f ....:-•-. ---.--..'.7.-,,,,,,,;i:. ...,-, ._-„,_•,;,,•-,,i. ., '.-, . , -, ..,- .--- , ,,i ..- . . . .... ..... , . ,,,. . •.„ . . .. . . Alli -- ---- ',.- -•.- • •.', : r;' 1 :• ' ••• f '•• :•r••• ',;M:,'1••M,•:,':.:',::...••:'.• •'•:<•4$7;'•.0;1'Ztrl 'r'f,' i • • • r r, ..' •, •. 1,‘ •••. . • • •'•i',1 i ,, . •, 'ri:••••,'S ' ! ,4-1,.,....;",',:- "'...i.-'7111.'Z.7.::'-=';;!'4,''. - - , ': .7-r • •• '••i•.•''''.1r.. •' •''''.--Ni.* *-,..,--,4,,,,,,,k..,-At • , ,c,... --,,,,,..,-it.....,,,,,,,i-.,...-:.-0,,,,,.. 1, _.,-,.,.i.,,....,,,....i.•.•.:'.,-,.:,::-.,..;..,..7.-. .:,...:..*...4,:,.*•2.f:•:- .•::-:..',.•',--,-1,1.'•:,.;..,.-4-,:t'z.-•'..,: !,,;;‘!..-,,,r•-:.',,,-.-•-;-,,,r.,-:,._ L ., r ':',;•::•• : :',‘, t•,r•':1••'•i. 1':••• '.-4..,f....., . . ..., ,:•.,gi..-•.'•' : ..;')., : I- ,..••;--;,-.!,!;:,,--•7:,....-•.:...*.,,,....'..".•-,'. .•,,,-.-:: --.,,,,5, --•-•,:.,....,'--,,,,-4"...,,,,...,',i,...,...:,,,,,--,----,-.,.:'-1.1., -,,,,,,.,:.,460,4;,-,..„......7i...,- . .. •.. ,,. if .ik,..•,i • . , :,,,,-';--;:,),;'.. .,,,,,;,:j.,,,,,,.7.',,,,-;:f,,,,-/,!.‘,": ',,' :',;',..,iv,,z0,;-'-,•:,..;3.,r'S.',;;Ic`Ff*ar- '- . -, ,, "-,,,•...tit?-, ', • „- '' ',....,:',:tr';;..`..,,,,-:,,,,,;',.„7-',7,,,•ai,,--;:i.:::',,,,,,,,,",..,..,,,;;:•f•-•",;::,,,,:,"rr:".,:,','--;_-_--',;,-i-r,;:..'"''''- 1- .•.'',';,..e$ , t.'• .f:!'..-'4...;'•:i ,-e.,,,--'.., ', •,,.'-. ;'j .. ' ,... _ - ifibir - ••,.,;,*•.:-".;'-';ifir;,';;',:.4-i,,It',*,/;'',,'-_i.':::::-';.i:T__'-',,:'':.'',:;• .'f::: .4,Wir.''..-.:"-' - . ..-. ,cr',.;„tr,..,fiki, r,r,-4•-i, i ._. . _ Hr..41113:-LakiEn 't..' ;.•,f i'.. .' 4.-11-4•tivi;,,,,,i".---..'-'#-.';",:-:- r..f•.::•.,-;.,,...,,• ,,,.'••:',.%..r:t.',-;;;,,,,i2,:-:',',Jt'i.-•,;'.';',-7.,-,,,,'.;:::;;,:•• r:r..4:-..., .,:" -. ,.-.., :• :-4-... 404, ' ,7 • * '. '4 • ;,.-, -:,117.,;--:- . ,.--"'--'. '-': ' -••-'.:: '.• rt t.),11M1-• .J 1°--._-- ,, -':•-,.- E-•ird-';!, •,.;-f., ,.'-'''..,!‘-'::-F-.-..•-, .:4%11--..,':-.-:. '',f:'''' ,• ..,:gctr--.4fi'lr t7,01.0',,, -",', , .,.r..,:-.•ii.m.-0.1- ..'-'' eleiliillECIr ...:.•. .,, •:to JEINtp0-714y "441 , 'r.,„..j .: ,,7„....?:i;;;,4„:=•:.•,::._=,;•_,•!.-,::•:•,,,,,:,-.,2„.,,::.,..,;:-. - • ....,r4v:,,x,-.11-•.' -.40m4 Urtri:, .-''-',----••-•' .1"'-.,77- - --.- - ',,',••••:_:',• : ,,,'•-::-Onvitir,MEi777 .: :' ,-.::::':ii: 4"-::'11-:•':;::::,'::::-f--?-:,---'1,::.-----,:',.--.,-,', -,-;,,;j4,,,,.....,,i -....,:, .. ,,,- ,,-.-.- .-,• DEPARTMENT --.;I-, - : - .- --..-v,Ei?.-ilippnovrkl.El,fr: . ,..;.1 r..6.i ..._•:7,••:.z•,..i.'.::.,:.y,-,,:i.-.:,.. ..,t',-..;',, ,. . 4,,,,,.,..,..-..•.,,,,,,....,-.-.- . ... ...,...... .. ,lier P!12?fiListem.: 7t.s.'.-.'-' ,.•-.':':',L'i-4;•.•f.'.:.,z..7.•.=-- -,-:.',.,-,-',.'±;,.7•:•---2,•':.,' '.-..:•.',,,.•:':::•,.•-.7.,;--,4 ,.4,-.4.,-,t,E, • • ' SU-10 iir,0 • ..ir :,,,,,-,....., ..,.. 3 ,-, . :* • -. -:• : '' $•'•:1• • tr••••,"•:,',..J•f'17:•, :,:v,„_•..:•••:',,•••••,,,,l•-,•:I,,f • ,if:',•••••••'••••:;:•••••....',..,.;;;;:ff';';I:fa::::•,•,,:X.1,1::f,,,••,.-.2..,1•:,,;,..22.:M••,,':',1T&'••••:::, •‘':••:•,'•,:i•;1:1;,•%rf•'-,2';:{1:412, .•.•,..7•• 1 r ,M. ':f . ,,. :: ' , fr... ' '. .:'f :,::,,,i ..,.,,,,,,. , „,:,..::. r,..•,,.......1„,,,:,, •,•,..,,,. ..,,, , f, r rr,'1'::::: ::, :f,•.,,,,f,..•,,,,,,,•,,,,,,,,...,,,,„',..1,..,,,,•••4•,••::::••• •,:•:.,',...'172:::.??.„,,,r,,r,,,•:,::,,:;:::.:,,,,,C.,,•..,:r: •...,;,7•,:•,•••',;:•':',t,;r1-11•:f'?'771ff,7,,••,,:77.:%, '•;•••1•2'.:•••1,••••,'1:1•••••:',,••;•::ii..fir.::::,,, r7f:4,•4•;11' :.. • ., f f„.'•• f i•r: '•• r.•';•'„' •''' • , •• • '"':r••: ,,-•-••••:7,7'.:„1:;•:::•,:r'1.:•: ::,T 7;,•••,...:.,:•-•'•[••_,E.r5,,:.,,';•;;:,:rf,:f,,,,,:;';1•:•r,i::,;•:,••',.,,,•:•;',•1:::,.:1•::;,1:•ii1•:,;:i•,,,;:f 1',..•,,,,•'.',I.1.:,'•.:,;,'M'',,::.:::.,4,,i,,r,•;;.'.±:41,:::-,?':',7'.•,,i•,;,17,1„i..„,,:•,,,•:,",',..,,... . r ,,••,i::•'•:•:.,.. ,'',..f:f.... r:„,'•_e:'''•-••• ,,,:.•••:1 ,::,•':••':','1'••:•••..:7::f r',:f'•••••fr'11•:,•,11Z:..r4•'•41:'.'F'-'..-T--:-1.,:r-:2`'''',....'•., '- ' '---- . , :-., ,T.7.-:,:-.i.;;;....'..., •,:r;;;„;''...''.'•••f.::::::''..: ".f.7'.1••'•'',t•••;•,;•:'...57'.11f rf•rff'::!':-. /1:,:1'•f.;,'t•:'1-.''''''::::•.•'"'f.,:•••.,F,.."-':,i[f.,,F;:•1''.'•1-7•'-'::::::-'7:.'''''::•'''' ! ',•:-.:-. .':.:•!..'•'''.•;,-,7,-;:;,•.'.:T-r,...f:4• ••i'f.',",,r;',';•,,:•'17.:,',-•-:','''''',.--,i'r'''•:::?::. 'T.'',•-;•.'.' 1,,,Tr,..-„,....„7,,,„:14;r5.. .:"te.',:•;',..:‘34'..-:4•:',Iit';(4 .•,--.*:=c,W,--.fT„.r..„:„.:,,,,;.7.,,,,,,,r.,,..,,,,!,,_r,,,, r;.„. . .,,, ...,, „., ..,„, ... ,.. „„.. _ ..,,,,,- ,-.,r , ,„ , „. ,,,,,. .,r„,..„..,. r,..,, ,,.,..,,.,... .. :,., ,, .„ , ,,,,,,.. „..,,,,, ,....., ..„...,... ,,,,..,„r ,„,.. .- ;„,, .. ,-,,,,,, . rIga,',",,:ei.,-.2z.=.r.'''---'"'-'---- L-,,..,m,Tr.,,,,,,,,,.,..,.,--.1',.•:.r."..,.,:,.::::-`,.";;,-,:;;I.r.::,-.;,- ,:"-„.:.`:-i,.c!a•:;-:;.'4...'-'l--:,;:•::'.'•1'..•';',•'-,:',4'.',-:,'•••••:4-rk•:-- : 1-,';'..,4,,..-[,"?'::7-i-•=-',..:'.:_:_-..i•-',,,L':::,'•.:',:',,T'--.:.,---;••.-:-••:,:"„:::i...,7"-•--,--,•„'"---i.:.':','-is.'.1:-,•-,-„'-',Aii--::::, .:,--..-'••••,:','''','-:.--'„'-i:•-'..-•,••:,:-.."-',;:...---.,-.1?-:-.,:'-`,.,::::::,,.;45.----",-.;z. ;i-.;',„:-:,;.,-;,.,:',,,,..''.,:•-::'',;;',r-,:,-....2-. 0 ,:-.,-,,,,,,,_:.±,,>:;:.,,,,,:.-,,.,-,-„„ ,,,,-. — - - I :-4.•,', ';;Ir''''...?'..':rs:':-:,;:•'-::::-.1`,';•,'-- -::.--7:-:,;:,..";,:r1.?4'4.-,''-'-'-':;'-='-'_‘•`::•-:.:-'..`':',';'.:".-7;:•-•/-'1,-: •,t-,4.1.i:.°).-,-':',',::'1'.;';'- .-.',.,•'•--.3-2:14 .-4,-2-- -.'.1,.-:,-,l-::-.1"-;.---,:-.;-'- '-''..-',... ..,;:--.•Liiiit'si'..;.''..:.:-.;'-'7,•?..•.1":-,-:;:'...,::::".',;,-.1.,:,•-•:'"::••: 1-1, 1'-•;,.:,-l'r:r.:::',',..',-.'-f•'-',,,,..-•:.•_:',2•:,,,L.,'--estZfl:;„::',.:.:::••••-'-:;4,-,_;:;'...,:z,',. - , ., ...r.. r,.. . ., , •,--11 ,,,...::),,,,,,•.,::.;,;.-.„-i,„..-,-.:.•,,-,,,:.7 rr,.-',,5,•;.,,i-.:•:-• -;,..,:-.,,,,:,-:-.•-::,-..:.;-„-_-]-„,.,-„.(::::;z...;,',.--..7„,'•,:-!...06t,,,,,7•7:,,• :i•-•-•'--,,--•-',:-1-;::,...:,j,;•-,,, ,:,-",•.7;..7i.- ',..-:•••.-='?-,',.:,-•-•_•„•...-.-Y,-;.,-',.;`..„,;:f:Yr:'',,r,'',' ,:-,7 ;..,;r:''''.'•',.....,,,,..:.'-_,:,'-';:.°'''r,:r7 rr,',4:;:ii-,,,T;i:11 -',.4•L-. ,,-:',2.-•',3,i;:.',_:.-.7-:-.7.1'''''',,If:;_t .':',, ,--,;-' :r..-•„,'...,,•.'.'',:iir". 4„,„7,.... _, ,. ....,,,,..,,,,,,.• . ......-,•-_. .7.7----:...-„.•, ------„,,,,,,,,,,,.....-,._ -::•77-:'.7.-:-----------:----72-,t:7:-::;,:.;----..:-.----'-•:. ,,-:-"---.- --:.: T. :-•,-•-•-..•-,,,',...„ ',•,...•,• ••• f• : •,••:;••••'''‘'. f•';,• ,4r.:4•.1;i'rr.f:•••:•'21::•r'f 1••••••'••••,ir:•: ': :•'•:±•••r:''•,;T;,;tr.'r•7•::",,rir: :',','•'••,_ '•:,1:•• ria:7•1:3::.,Yy•:•;:,•;•,r;:if7;,114,114,;;A•r.1:',.'••:,••:::.'f1,1:,.r•i,;;',•,.::•:1,•,••:,;:,' L:'''f:,•'::: ;;•::••g•1;••;',••••4•,, •:'••:,,.., ... ....,:-_•,-----777'...--.- '-' :' ' ''''":" '....: - -:;,'-.7." ''"7.'77*.r.::±:•'•:•: • • •:::11••'•,:••• .1: •'• '',V.; '.•'••'•rr•r 7•‘':'':••••-7:r•'';''•''•::;•••••Trr r:•••••7'..f:••:•,:1•'''Mf if r'l 'frr:4i: 'i•*.7'.tr..:40,•11T :t''•'.1,'1'.4 1.;•••••.••,:'•'7:f't•:,f'•,:r.,,it,Hr'11 M'.'!•.1::•::_1,:r:1;i'lk 44.,:fir.4..LaF.1••,,:i 7'::,, ''' ' ', ''---7 - ' -,-7,- ---- •:::-•<-, :-,-;;;;:i;".7:::::-.;--,"`",•:-T''•:7.„777;,...;,-.- ,•••••- , . r-..-:: -:::::-.,--, ,.:-.,,,,,,,t,...]:.,..,L.-„:.:::-.•-•,',"i:::::_-_:„:.,---::-',-.----,-::,':-...:-...• ,..--,'.7'1. ,-.....•,;-.,::::..7.11'•-'... '',...',..0,1,r,'!"•:.„'..V.:•!'i•,.-"-'1"74''-'•,-'77-17$9.14;•,-7P.14v,r-,'-7 J,..--1....i.,... 4.4:....;„7... 7 ;, ;',-..„?,',„:.•.„..-i::-•-,•:-::-.7---.---•"•:,'•'•''' •'....''''. '- .4„,•-„,,,,-„ ..,-..,..-„,...r,,,,,::,•',.!!'.',,7',:::::i..•--..i ''' -..:i,-,--,4::..,4-•41, 17,-%.....,....it, -,,...,--at.,-- .. -•••4-,,,,--",- '.....-,Iir, ••,.,,,is,r,.- •-,---.--.•-•,...irrir-_,!...;... ,.......r,,,,s,,..,,,-....,,w!.--,.. .._,.1, -.... .,-...„, .•4'1/2,.L4' 1 ( (iOrc It° • b \$61- ninL, D Y ` / CITY COUNCIL ACTION REP C� , JUNE 4, 2002 ,/Arr(D 5 FROM: Redevelopment/Special Pr 'Projects Department SUBJECT: South Highland-Juniper-Walnut Sewer Improvements; g Construction Contract, Street Closures, and Contract Amendment for Construction Management. RECOMMENDATION: `' 1. ACCEPT BID IN THE AMOUNT OF$471,045, AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO k �'" ENTER INTO A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH A.D. GENERAL ENGINEERING FOR � � THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE SOUTH HIGHLAND-JUNIPER-WALNUT SEWER \ r PROJECT; AND AUTHORIZE A 10% CONTINGENCY FUND IN THE AMOUNT OF $47,104! 2. AUTHORIZE STREET CLOSURES FOR WALNUT AVENUE BETWEEN SIERRA AND CYPRESS AVENUES, AND JUNIPER AVENUE BETWEEN WALNUT AND SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUES, PER STAGE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE SOUTH HIGHLAND- JUNIPER-WALNUT SEWER PROJECT; AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO ADMINISTRATIVELY APPROVE ANY SUBSEQUENT CHANGES IN CLOSURE DATES AND DURATIONS AS NECESSARY FOR THE SAFE AND TIMELY CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT. 3. AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ASSOCIATED ENGINEERING TO (1`) PROVIDE PROJECT CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION SERVICES ON THE SOUTH HIGHLAND-JUNIPER-WALNUT SEWER PROJECT, IN THE AMOUNT OF $83,030 WITH A 10% CONTRACT CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF$8,303. COUNCIL GOALS: To invest in the City's infrastructure,by providing for the development of new infrastructure and by improving the aesthetics of the community; and To practice sound fiscal management by living within our means while investing in the future. DISCUSSION: On April 16, 2002, the City Council authorized staff to advertise for bids for the sewer installation of the South Highland-Juniper-Walnut Sewer Project (SP-46-02), as part of the Robert W. Weddle Capital Improvements Program (RWW-CIP). On May 23, 2002, the City Clerk received 10 bid proposals for the construction of this project. The bids were publicly opened at 10:00 AM in the City Council Chambers by the City Clerk's Office. After reviewing the proposed bid documents and performing the reference checks, the Redevelopment and Special Projects Department staff has determined A.D. General Engineering as the lowest responsible bidder. 0)'9 Item: CC N Page 1 of 2 .1 � In order to expedite the construction of the sewer improvement, it is recommended that Walnut Street be closed for approximately two weeks between Sierra Avenue and Cypress Avenue. This closure would allow the construction to move quickly and minimize traffic impacts to local residents and the A.B. Miller High School summer school students. It is further recommended that Juniper Avenue be closed for a period of approximately two weeks between Walnut Street and South Highland Avenue to accommodate construction on Juniper Avenue. This will again allow the contractor to expedite work in this street and minimize impacts to adjacent residents. The contractor would be required to provide ingress and egress for the adjacent residents during the road closure. Because the high school will be holding only partial day summer school classes, the impacts to local traffic should be minimal. These closures are expected to take place sometime between July 1 and September 15, 2002. All local residents and agencies providing emergency services will be notified by mail and newspaper. City.solicited proposals for Engineering Services (SP-46-02) for the South Highland Avenue and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvement Project. On July 17, 2001, the City Council approved a Contractual Services Agreement with Associated Engineers, Inc. in the amount of $69,500 plus a 10% contingency in the amount of $6,950, for Phases I and II of this project. Phase I includes: preparation of design, construction plans, and engineering services; and Phase II: bidding assistance and pre-construction meeting. The proposed Amendment No. 1 to the existing consultant services agreement, in the amount of $83,030 will provide for Phase III work including: construction management, geotechnical services, and inspection services as directly related to this project. Phase III work is based on time and materials with not-to-exceed amounts. The contract amendment will be effective for the duration of the project. FISCAL IMPACT: The requested amount for the sewer construction and Amendment No. 1 for construction management and inspection is available in the Robert W. Weddle Capital Improvement Projects Fund 425, Program 95207. MOTION: Approve staff recommendation. SU I ED BY: APPROVED BY: Ra mond r gg enn th R. Hunt Redevelopment/Special P jects City Manager Director RB:cp ATTACHMENTS: Amendment #1 on file with City Clerk Page2of2 AESCO, Inc. 18548 Beach Boulevard Huntington Beach, California 92648 May 14, 2002 tlAY City of Fontana Engineering Division 2002 Cit Clerk RECEIVEDY REDEVELOPMENT/ 8353 Sierra Ave Fontana, CA 92335-3528 Reference: Sewer System Improvements (SP4602) Fontana, CA(San Bernardino Co. ) So Highland/Juniper Ave to Walnut Ave, 92335 Ladies and Gentlemen: AESCO, Inc. is pleased to know that you are associated with the above referenced project, and would like to be part of your project team. We are capable of meeting your geotechnical and construction material testing services. Our geotechnical capabilities extend from initial site evaluation, to geologic fault and soils investigation (Soil borings), to cost-effective foundation design recommendation. Our expertise ranges from site feasibility studies to expert testimony on existing building distress. AESCO owns and operates various types of drilling rigs equipped to collect soil samples from various subsurface formations. We are capable of installing ground water monitoring wells and piezometers to measure subsurface water elevations and collect water samples. We evaluate soils, concrete, asphalt, and other building components prior to and during construction. Our involvement helps prevent deviations that can affect the quality or compromise the design. AESCO has emerged as construction materials experts, called on to examine and consult on complex aggregates, additives, and new uses of building and paving materials. If we can be of further service to you or should additional information be needed, please complete the attached form for your convenience. We look forward to hearing from you and your organization. Sincer ly, AES , C. A am Chamaa, P.E. Manager (714)593-2567 fax: (714)593-0022 Construction Material Testing,Environmental&Geotechnical Engineering Firm AESCO, Inc. 18548 Beach Boulevard Huntington Beach, California 92648 Please complete and mail to: (Name) (Firm) (Address) (Phone Number) (Fax Number) A. AESCO,INC.would like to provide a service for you. We should: Contact you immediately Contact you after Do not contact you Send you a company brochure. B. Please indicate in the appropriate blanks how AESCO,INC. could possibly assist you. Soil Borings Soil&Foundation Engineering Environmental Engineering Phase I and II Construction Inspection Materials Testing Other Services C. Remarks: D. Reference: City of Fontana Engineering Division Sewer System Improvements(SP4602) Fontana, CA (San Bernardino Co. ) So Highland/Juniper Ave to Walnut Ave, 92335 051002 (714)593-2567 fax: (714)593-0022 Construction Material Testing,Environmental&Geotechnical Engineering Firm ` C „i 11 et ` c, "%` June 6, 2002 7 ??? &tq , A.D. General Eygineering Construction 2829 North Gl noaks Boulevard Burbank, California, 91504 RE: South Highland Avenue Sewer Improvement Project Bid No. SB-46-02 Execution of Contract Documents Dear Mr. ??: On May 23, 2002, the City Council authorized to award the Construction Contract to A.D. General Engineering Construction, on the above referenced project. Enclosed to be executed herewith are three (3) sets of Contract Documents. All three sets must be executed separately and only City provided forms shall be used. Return all three (3) sets of the executed Contract Documents back to the address below as soon as possible. One fully executed set will be returned to your office at a later date for your records. City of Fontana Redevelopment/Special Project Department 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, CA 92335 Attn: George Harvilla If any additional information is required, please contact the undersigned at (909) 427- 9166. Respectfully, REDEVELOPMENT/SPECIAL PROEJCTS DEPARTMENT George Harvilla, P.E. Consultant Project Manager GH:cp enclosures Page 1of2 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday,June 06, 2002 5:32 PM To: Carla Pursel Subject: Associated's Amendment Carla, April Morris' name should go on the Amendment. George Original Message From: Tom Holliman [mailto:tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 5:36 PM To: 'Harvilla, George' Subject: RE: Results of City Council Meeting Great news George, I am available all day June 20th (so far), any idea when we will have the in-house team be held, let me know and if I'm to attend. Regarding the amendment,the name on the amendment should be April Morris, President. Thanks, Tom Holliman Associated Engineers, Inc. Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Thursday,June 06, 2002 4:52 PM To: 'Tom Holliman' Cc: Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org) Subject: RE: Results of City Council Meeting Tom, Good news! Your amendment was approved on Tuesday, along with the awarding of the construction contract to A.D. General Construction. City staff is going to have an internal meeting before we have the actual Preconstruction Meeting. Let me suggest Thursday, June 20 for the Preconstruction Meeting, at 3:00 at Fontana City Hall. Question: Who is going to sign the amendment for Associated? Can you please provide their full name? Carla, can you reserve a conference room for the 20th, please? George Original Message 6/7/2002 Page 2 of 2 From: Tom Holliman [mailto:tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 5:30 PM To: 'Harvilla, George' Subject: Results of City Council Meeting Would you please update me on the results of the City Council meeting and you're availability for a pre-construction meeting the week of June 17 -21, 2002. I am assuming that our construction management amendment was approved. Any discussion or problems we need to deal with? Thank you, Tom Holliman Associated Engineers, Inc. 6/7/2002 AMENDMENT No. 1 TO ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT (hereinafter "Amendment") is made this 4th day of June, 2002 by and between the City of Fontana, a municipal corporation of the State of California, located at 8353 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, CA 92335, County of San Bernardino, (hereinafter"CITY") and Associated Engineers,Inc. with its principal place of business at 3311 E. Shelby Street, Ontario, California, 91764-4872, (hereinafter "CONSULTANT") with reference to that certain Engineering Services Agreement for design and construction plans ("Project") approved by the City Council and entered into between the City and Consultant on the 17th day of July,2001,(hereinafter"Agreement"). The CITY and CONSULTANT agree to amend the Agreement as follows: 1. As of July 17, 2001, CONSULTANT shall be known only as Associated Engineering for all issues regarding this Agreement. 2. This amendment is made to increase the Agreement in the amount of$83,030.00,from$76,450.00 to$159,480.00 including a 10%contingency of$8,303.00. 3. The CONSULTANT shall provide additional engineering services such as construction • management, geotechnical services, and inspection services for the Project as indicated in the proposal dated May 15,2002,attached hereto as Exhibit A 4. Payments shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement. 5. All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in force. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have accepted and made this Amendment upon the term, conditions and provisions above stated,as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF FONTANA ASSOCIATED ENGINEERING By: Kenneth R.Hunt,City Manager ATTEST: Name: :Thomas Hollima . .,Sr Project Manager Title: Beatrice Watson,City Clerk fir 0 '4-- Raymond Bragg, Redevelopment/Special Projects Director t Annette Henckel,Acting Human Resources Director/Risk Management APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: Clark Alsop,City Attorney Page 1 of 1 F1�N: S Highland Sewer Page 1 of 3 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 10:42 AM To: Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc- Cc: 'alarson @fontana.org' Subject: FW: S Highland Sewer Tom, Can you get Alex an electronic copy of the South Highland Sewer? Thanks. George Original Message From: Alex Larson [mailto:alarson@fontana.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 10:36 AM To: George Harvilla (E-mail) Subject: FW: S Highland Sewer George, Could you get me a copy of the electronic files for the City's S Highland/Sierra project. I never received anything after hearing from Tom last year. Now that the plans are finalized,it would be helpful to have them. Thanks, AL Alex Larson,P.E. City of Fontana Traffic Section 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana,CA 92335 (909)350-7696 voice (909)350-6618 fax Original Message From:Alex Larson Sent:Wednesday,November 14,2001 2:53 PM To: 'Tom Holliman' Cc: 'Susy Barrientos';Anthony Marcaida;'Steve Steinbrecher' Subject:RE: S Highland Sewer Thanks Tom. 5/14/2002 FW: S Highland Sewer Page 2 of 3 AL Original Message From:Tom Holliman[mailto:tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent:Wednesday,November 14,2001 2:52 PM To: 'Alex Larson' Subject:RE:S Highland Sewer Hi Alex, We're still trying to finalize the alignment we need to do some potholingin S.Highland to locate the fiber optic line on the north side of the street. We should have something locked down by next week. When we do I'll send you a copy and CC Susy. Tom H. Original Message From: Alex Larson[SMTP:alarson@fontana.org] Sent: Wednesday,November 14,2001 12:14 PM To: 'Tom Holliman' Cc: 'Susy Barrientos';'Steve Steinbrecher';Anthony Marcaida Subject: RE:S Highland Sewer Tom, I am just checking in with you to see if you have an approved alignment yet for the sewer on S Highland between Juniper and Sierra: If so,can you send the efiles to Susy to include as existing utilities in Willdan's existing project on South Highland. • Thank you. If you have any questions,please call me at 909 350-7696 or Susy Barrientos at 562 908-6247. AL Original Message From:Tom Holliman[mailto:tomh@assoc-eng.com <mailto:tomh@assoc-eng.com>] Sent:Tuesday,October 16,2001 11:15 AM To: 'Alex Larson' Subject:RE:S Highland Sewer Thanks Alex, When we have our alignment finalized I'll make sure we send you a copy of the drawings. If you have any questions before then let me know. Tom H. Original Message From: Alex Larson [SMTP:alarson@fontana.org] Sent: Tuesday,October 16,2001 11:02 AM To: 'tomh@assoc-eng.com' 5/14/2002 FW: S Highland Sewer Page 3 of 3 ,/ . Cc: 'Susy Barrientos';'Abner Catig';'Steve Steinbrecher';Felipe Molinos Subject: S Highland Sewer Tom, Per our discussion earlier today,I have asked that Willdan's designer, Susy Barrientos to send you the Microstation files for Willdan's design plans on S Highland Avenue. She should be getting those out to you no later than next Wednesday, 10/24. Also,please keep in touch with me regarding your project so that we can incorporate your firms sewer design on S Highland between Juniper and Sierra into our plans. Thank you. Please call me at 909 350-7696 if you need anything else or if you need those files sooner. Susy can be reached at 562 908-6247. AL Alex Larson,P.E. City of Fontana Traffic Section 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana,CA 92335 (909)350-7696 voice (909)350-6618 fax «File:ATT00006.htm>> «File:ATT00023.htm>> • 5/14/2002 PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Project Number SP-46-02 City of Fontana 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, CA 92335 SAFETY IS THE MOST IMPORTANT CONSIDERATION DURING CONSTRUCTION 1 WELCOME 2 INTRODUCTIONS Associated Engineers Onwer City of Fontana Engineering Traffic Inspection Engineer/Construction Manager Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 East Shelby Street Ontario, CA. 91764 (909) 980-1982 Tom Holliman Senior Project Manager Curt Ingram Construction Manager Project Manager Ralph Roberts Construction Inspector (909)232-0819 Contractor Utility Representatives 3 PROJECT OVERVIEW- Construct 5,000 feet of 10-inch sewer main in Walnut, Juniper, and South Highland Avenue SAFETY IS THE MOST IMPORTANT CONSIDERATION DURING CONSTRUCTION 4 SCHEDULE Preconstruction conference 20-Jun-02 Starting Date 01-Jul-02 Ending Date 9/15/2002 days Q\Job-No\Preconstruction Meeting Agenda Revised:6/20/2002 I 5 CONSTRUCTION ITEMS A. Status of contract documents B. Time of Completion C. Construction Schedule D. Traffic Requirements-road closures and traffic control plan E. Utility Notifications (USA) F. Shop Drawing Submittals G. Control and flow of water-storm drain rules, construction water H. Clean-up&dust control I. Trench safety-submittals J. Standard Specifications-with contract amendments K. Staging area L. Survey-48 hour written notice M. Progress payments N. Changed Conditions O. Record drawings 6 CONTRACTOR ISSUES 7 AJOURN SAFETY IS THE MOST IMPORTANT CONSIDERATION DURING CONSTRUCTION O;Wob-No\Preconstruction Meeting Agenda Revised:6/20/2002 1/- ea-7- , ie —010 Pap. N Z./ C— Se—e 0,0/ t)t' •v7 . L 6 .r 1.1 r 1-7 de5' le--i/7 Cee--( /-7,../f//7;"Ae• .79 76, LV ‘)/. 0 — I e r s., .\" LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS, Inc. 3311 East Shelby Street, Ontario, California 91764 OFFICE: (909) 980-1982 FAX: (909) 941-0891 TO: City of Fontana DATE: 05-02-02 No. 01-048 Engineering Dept ATTENTION: George Harvilla RE: SOUTH HIGHLAND AND JUNIPER SEWER B Ralph VIA: U.S.Mail UPS X A.E. Delivery Other Copies Date No. Pages Description 1 07/01/02 1 Submittal#1—Contractors License 1 07/01/02 1 Submittal#2—T1-Annual Trench /Excavation Permit 1 07/01/02 2 Submittal#3—Code of Trench Safety 1 07/01/02 5 Submittal#4—Code of Construction Safety 1 07/01/02 10 Submittal#5—Confined/Permit Space Program 1 07/01/02 11 Submittal#6—Workplace Injury Prevention Plan 1 07/01/02 9 Submittal#7—Tren-Shore Vertical Shoring 1 07/01/02 6 Submittal#8—Local Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan 1 07/01/02 1 Submittal#9—Pollution Control Plan 1 07/01/02 1 Submittal#10—Emergency Contact List 1 07/01/02 5 Submittal#12—Construction Schedule George, Here are the copies of submittals 1-10, 12 for the South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer improvments, Bid No. sp-46-02. Submittal#11 was incomplete and is being resubmitted by the contractor. , COPY TO: SIGNED: 4,( 0_7 If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once. For: Ralph Roberts, Inspector \\ASSOC-WIN2K\aepcfiles3\200I\o 1 o64\RALPH\Submittals-GH-T-o7-01.doc ' State of California r ifiuQ True r CONTRACTORS STATE LICENSE BOARD Affairs ACTIVE LICENSE F 01,41 license)umbe728416 Enlilr CORP tusinessAlmeA D GENERAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INC Cl ssilialionl E7pI ion Dae0 5/31/2 0 0 3 ► SHOP Ewa ua a4, snid SUBMITTAL. JOB #: __01-o d $ Ot—• �"',q'� pp p, SECT ON #: y , NO EXCEPTIONS TAKEN f- . AMEND AND RESUBMIT ri RETURNED WITH (-1 EXCEPTIONS NOTED REVIEWED BY: — DATE REVIEWED:7 / wd DATE RETURNED: a i i-',i c yr LHur-L)nivw DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS - DIVISION OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ' No: 2002-903402 PERMIT Permit Issued To (Insert Employer's Name, Address and Telephone No.) No. AD General Engineering Construction Inc Date 11/21/2001 2829 N Glenoaks Blvd Ste '106/101 Region 4 Burbank CA 91504-2660 . District 3 (818)559-5783 Tel. (818) 901-5403 Type of Permit T1-ANNUAL TRENCH/EXCAVATION Pursuant to Labor Code Sections 6500 and 6502,this Permit is issued to the above-named employer for the projects described below. State Contractor's License Number 72$41 6 Permit Valid through December 31, 2002 Description of Project Location Address City and County Anticipated Dates Starting Completion Various Statewide 1/1/2002 12/31/2002 or issue date whichever is later. '� IA\rVWV C.31 f i 1V SUBMITTAL : 2------•---------__ i JOB e: 01. n b "f. , This Permit is issued upon the following conditions: JOB NAME: - i 1. That the work is performed by the same employer. If this is an annua p&Err�tTih �� iNapria.t.e-Dis-t i•e-t Office shall be notified, in writing, of dates and location of job site prior o commencement.iOE �y CEPTIONS TAKEN 2. The employer will comply with all occupational safety and health stan aids or orders applicable to the above projects, and any other lawful orders of the Division. AMEND AND RESUBMIT ill 3. That if any unforeseen condition causes deviation from the plans or st tements contain tl the Permit(�-- Application Form the employer will notify the Division immediately. RETURNED \;NI` I-I L—► 4. Any variation from the specification and assertions of the Permit Appli ationffpt`gJ�ioaa�Gai�o' Rle�ty orders may be cause to revoke the permit. p�- o¢v 5. This permit shall be posted at or near each place of employment as pri�'d�ed'ili-8 UGH'34f. DATE From Received By 'y E RETURNED; Investigated by .,A IF Jodie Snyder Permit Unit Saf ine Date ❑ Cash Amount Date ', Approved by 11/26/2001 ® Check 5595 $100.00 11/21/01 District Manager/Permit Unit Date A. D. GENERAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION, INC. "CODE OF SAFE PRACTICES FOR TRENCH/EXCAVATION/SHAFT" 1 . ) Obtain a permit from the Division of Occupational Safety and Health District office if the depth is 5 feet or deeper. 2 . ) A copy of the permit must be available at the job-site. 3 . ) Job notification must be sent to the nearest district office of DOSH prior to digging. (for annual permit holder) . 4. ) Determine and locate underground utilites by calling (USA) 1-800-422-4133 , within 48 hours . 5 . ) A competent person must supervise the trench/excavation/ shaft at all times . 6 . ) Remove trees , poles, boulders, and/or similar objects which may be hazardous to the employees . 7 . ) The competent person shall assess the job-site for possible moving ground, also after a. rainstrom, earthquake, or other events prior to the employee's exposure to the trench/ excavation/shaft . 8 . ) Workers shall be protected by shoring, sloping, benching, casing or other equivalent alternate methods . Protective devices or materials in which the area is utilizing shall conform with the type of soil present at the job-site. 9 . ) Soil/dirt shall be kept at least 2-feet from the edge of the trench/excavation. Check for cracks and sloughing around and above the excavation area. 10 . ) Provide a convenient way for the workers to enter and leave the trench/excavation. A ladder, ramp or other safe means of egress shall be in the trench/excavations that are 4 feet or deeper so as to require no more that 25 feet of lateral travel for employees . 11 . ) Where employees or equipment are required or permitted to cross over excavation deeper than 6 feet and wider than 30 inches , walkways or bridges with standard guardrails shall be provided. 12 . ) Do not excavate beneath the base of an adjacent foundation, retaining wall or other structure so as to undermine such a structure. Support undermined sidewalks and adjoining structures if these conditions exist . 13 . ) Do not use an existing wall or structure as a retaining wall until it will safely support the expected load. This must be determined by a competent person. 14. ) Protective barriers, barricades , and/or caution signs shall be provided at the trench/excavation in the remote area, or where the employees could fall into the trench/excavation , area. 15 . ) Backfill temporary wells, pits and or shafts immediately upon completion of the operation. 16. ) Shoring, sloping, benching or any other equivalent protective method shall comply with Title 8, California Code of Regulations. The protective method shall be designed by a Registered Civil Engineer in the State of California, if the trench/excavation is deeper than 20 feet . 17 . ) Employees shall wear the appropriate type of safety shoes/ work boots at the job-site. (No tennis shoes at the job- site) . 18 . ) Head protection shall always be provided at the construction site. 19 . ) Ladders/ramps used as an access to the trench/excavation/ shaft shall be free of any defects . • 20 . ) Employer shall read, and understand and comply with the Construction Safety Orders, rules and regulation prescribed by Title 8 , California Code of Regul,- :9• - -- ti a�7�Fx3fi�� � �L `V iEWR SUBMITTAL #: 3 • JOB #: p/-o6e1 • JOB NAME: ,4 ran.,a ,S'z,. e- SECTION #: I NO EXCEPTIONS TAKEN fj • AMEND AND RESUBMIT ri RETURNED WITH EXCEPTIONS NOTED REVIEWED BY: DATE REVIEWED:7-1-v2i DATE RETURNED: URNED: ..___. 7r7.7 4 'k'35�61 Lia ,. 'bFiC, a\.L � .� .,e ;,. I JOB #: Ol-°69_ w JOB NAME: .. H7-4-4)A StWGL SECTION s e A. General Engineering Construction Inc., 2829 N.Glenoaks Blvd.Ste 106/101 • Burbank,Ca 91504 j NO EXCEPTIONS TAKEN 22 Phone(818)559-7383♦Fax(818)559-5502 AMEND AND RESUBMIT r t CODE OF SAFE PRACTICES RETURNED WITH • CONSTRUCTION EXCEPTIONS NOTED REVIEWED FENS At.P DATE REVIEWED. .177—Att—g-Trg ns shall follow these safe practices rules , DATE rET RN render every possible aid to safe operations , and report conditions or practices to the supervisor or superintendent . 2 . Supervisors shall insist on employees observing and obeying every applicable Company , State or Federal regulation and order as is necessary to the safe conduct of the work , and shall_ take such action as is necessary to obtain compliance . 3 . All employees shall be given frequent accident prevention instructions . Instructions shall be given at least every Ten working days . 4 . Anyone know to be under the influence of drugs or intoxicating substance which impair the employee ' s ability to safely perform the assigned duties shall not be alllowed on the job while in that condition . 5 . Horseplay , scuffling and other acts which tend to have an adverse influence on the safety or well -being of the employees shall be prohibited . 6 . Work shall be well planned and supervised to prevent injuries in the handling of materials and in working to- gether with equipment . 7 . No one shall knowingly be permitted or required to work while the employee' s ability or alertness is so impaired by fatigue , illness , or other causes that they might unnecessarily expose the employee or others to injury . 8 . Employees shall not enter manholes , underground vaults , chambers , tanks , silos , or other similar places that receive little ventilation unless it has been determined that it is safe to enter . 9 . Employees shall be instructed to ensure that all guards and other protection devices are in proper places and adjusted , and shall report deficiencies promptly to the • supervisor or superintendent . 10 . Crowding or pushing when boarding or leaving any vechicle or conveyance shall be prohibited. 11 . Workers shall not handle or tamper with any electrical equipment , machinery, or air or water lines in a manner not within the scope of their duties , inless they have received instructions from their superintendent . 12 . All injuries shall be reported promptly to the supervisor • or superintendent so that arrangments can be made for medical or first aid treatment . 13 , When lifting heavy objects , the large muscles of the leg instead of the smaller muscles of the back shall be used. 14 . Inappropriate footwear or shoes with thin or badly worn soles must not be worn. 15 . Materials , tools or ther objects shall not be thrown from buildings or structures until proper precautions are taken to protect others from falling objects , 16 . Employees shall cleanse themselves thoroughly after handling hazardous substances and follow special instructions from authorized sources . 17 . Hod carriers should avoid the use of extension ladders when carrying loads . Such .ladders may provide adequate, strength, but the rung postion and rope arrangement make such climbing difficult and hazardous for this trade. 18 . Work shall be arranged so that employees are able to face a ladder and use of both hands while climbing . 19. Gasoline shall not" be used for cleaning purposes . 20 . No burning, welding, or other source of ignition shall be applied to any enclosed tank or vessel , even if there are openings , until it has been determined that no possibility of explosion exists and authority for the work is obtained from the supervisor or superintendent . 21 . Any damage to scaffolds , flasework, or other supporting structures shall be immediately reported to the super- visor and repaired before use. USE OF TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT: 22 . All tools and equipment shall be maintained in good condition. 23. Damaged tools or equipment shall be removed from service and tagged "DEFECTIVE. " 24 . Pipe or Stillson wrenches shall not be used as a subs- titute for other wrenches . 25 . Only appropriate tools shall be used for a specific job. 26. Wrenches shall not be altered by the addition of .handle- extensions or "cheaters . " 27 . Files shall be equipped with handles and not used to punch or pry. 28 . A screwdriver shall not be used as a chisel . 29 . Wheelbarrows shall not be pushed with handles in an upright positions . 30 . Portable electric tools shall not lifted or lowered by means of the power cord. Ropes shall be used. 31 . Electric cords shall not be exposed if damaged. 32 . In locations where the use of a portable power tool is difficult , the tool shall be supported by means of a rope or similar of adequate strength. MACHINERY AND VEHICLES: 33 . Only authorized persons shall operate machinery or equipment . 34 . Loose or frayed clothing, long hair, dangling ties , finger rings , etc . , shall not be worn around moving machinery or other areas where they may become en- tangled. 35 , Machinery shall not be serviced, repaired or adjusted while in operation, nor shall oiling of moving parts be attempted, except on equipment that is designed or fitted with safeguards to protect the persons performing the work. 36 . Where appropriate, lock-out procedures shall be used. 37 . Employees shall not work under vehicles supported by jacks or chain hoists without protective blocking that will prevent injury if jacks or hoists should fail . 38 . Air hoses shall not be disconnected at compressors until the hose line has been bled. 39 . All excavations shall be visually inspected before backfilling to ensure that it is safe to backfill . 40 . Excavating equipment shall not be operated near cuts , banks , or cliffs if employees are working below. 41 . Tractors, bulldozers, scrapers and carryalls shall slot operate where there is a possibility of overturning in dangerous areas like edges of deep fills, cut banks , and steep slopes . 42 . When loading where there is a probability of dangerous slides or movement of material , the wheels or treads ce loading equipment , other than that riding on nails , should be turned in the direction which will facilitate escape in case of danger, except in a situation where this postion of the wheels or treads would cause a greater operational hazard. . , • Vvh „ POLICIES AND PROCEDURES JOB NAME: 1.11,6 Ti•Ltn-022-_-___—" Section: Safety SECTION Subject: Confined/Permit Space Program NAOMEENXDCEAP T IONS NDRE rA RESUBMIT koi Revised: November 30, 1994 RETURNED WITH EXCEPTIONS NOTED GENERAL REVIEWED BY: Much of the work performed by mis within confined spaces. .A.s space: DATE RETURNED: I. Has limited routes of entry or exit, 2, Is large enou,gh to eater an.d work vvithbr, and 3. Is not intended for continuous occupancy by workers. These confined spaces will be designated "Permit Spaces" 'when any of the follow* conditions also exist: 1 Doeskim contain a hazardous atmosphere, 2. Presents an engulfment hazard, 3. Presents an entrapment hazard,or 4. Contains any other recognized serious hazard, To protect our employees from the potential hazards generally associated with these spaces, such spaces must be identified and specific actions mu st be taken by employees entering/working in such spaces, IDENTIFICATION Supervisors shall review the characteristics of all spaces to be entered, using the flowchart in Attachment A, to determine if the space is a confined or permit trace. Examples of such spaces include, but are not limited to,vessels,tanks,vaults,bins,lines,large pipes,and manholes, Once a space has been identified as a confined or permit space, specific actions must be completed • \ and specific safeguards must be in place prior to any employee entry. • PRE-ENTRY trgadi An entry permit is required prior to entry into a permit space, The permit contained in Attachment B (or an equivalent) nnzst be used. This r ared permit will be supervisor who has been trained in aon!med space entry and permittingp bye entry shall be approved by a second level of supervision or customer procedures. The permit be available, at all times, duringrepresentative. The permit shall entry into the space, The permit shall become a part of the job file/package. Atmosphere Semolina The atmosphere of an identified confined space shall be sampled prior to entry. Such shall be repeated during the initial ear. As a the atmosphere will be tested for sampling level, combustible gas/vapor presence and levels of suspected toxic gas/vapor. Such sampling could be conducted by customer safety/hygiene persomneL In these cases,the sample results shall be reviewed by an Jsupervisor. )wfll also conduct air sampling. The person conducting the sample shall be qualified in appropriate sampling procedures and operation of the atmosphere sampling equipment being used. Sampled oxygen level mast not be less than 19.5%nor more than 23.5%. In the event the oxygen level is less than 19.5%, entry employees shall wear an appropriate air supplying respirator. For levels of oxygen which are above 23.5%, entry shall not be made until the oxygen level has been reduced to below 22%. Normally,combustible gas/vapor detection is indicated at 10% of the lower explosive limit (LEL) of a combustible gas/vapor. For the purpose of entry,any detectable level of combustibles above 5%ofLEL shall preclude entry until the level is decreased to a level of 1%or less of the(LEL). Sampling for toxic gas/vapor shall include, as a minimum, hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and carbon monoxide (CO). Detected levels of a toxic gasiv,apor which exceed the current permissible exposure level (PEL) or recommended TLV shall indicate respiratory protection is required (unless the level can be reduced to 25%of PEL). The selection of an appropriate respirator shall be based upon the PEL of the contaminant, measured levels of the contaminant, absorption characteristics of the cone set, eye irritant properties of the contaminant and the protection factor of the selected respirator. Respirator selection and use shall be in accordance with the 1 . Respiratory Protection Procedure. ygptilatl When allowed, the space should be ventilated prior to entry to reduce hazardous contami eat levels or to increase oxygen'content to acceptable levels. When practical, continuous ventilation of the space should occur during an times the space is occupied. When atmospheric hazards arc the only hazard iq a confined space, and the atmosphere can be made safe by ventilation, special entry procedures will apply. ` L Monitoring Continuous monitoring of the atmosphere may not be req uired while confined spaces are occupied. In the case of permit spaces, periodic manitoring, not to exceed an interval of one hour,could be required. Monitoring requirements shall be based upon the nature of the space. P.M.and EguinmEnt All required P.P.L. and equipment shall be assembled and inspected. Such equipment shall be indicated on the entry permit. Retrieval/rescue lines shall be provided and used. Such lines shall be attached to the entry person's safety harness and taped to the air line (if used). In cases in which the retrieval could cause a hazardous condition,the line can be eliminated. Emergencv/Reacue„- oced x a Procedures trust be available for possible emergencies during an en txy. As procedures shall list actions to be taken in the event of anemployee in a t►tln Minimum, thev equipment failure in the injury in the space;protective space, working equipment failure inside or outside the space, communication methods and rescue procedures. At least one person, familiar with first aid and CPR shall be in the immediate area during an entry, b.wIil rely upon local emergency teams for the possible rescue of KA personnel from a confmned/permit space. All potential sources of energy shall be disconnected, blinded, vented, released, blocked, locked-out, tagged-out or otherwise disabled prior to entry. When such isolation is accomplished by the customer,it shall be verified by the ,Lack OutlTag-put Procedure(LO/TO). ENTRY 5pape Attendant An attendant shall be present continuously while a permit space is occupied. This person shall be fully aware of the space hazards, communication methods, exposure symptoms, emergency procedures, use of provided equipment and rescue procedures. Attendants will be provided a copy of Attachment C. This person shall maintain visual contact with the person in the space at all times. If visual contact must be broken, the attendant will signal "Stop Working" to the entry person unta'l visual contact is regained. In cases where an attendant cannot observe the worker from outside the space, a second attendant will be required to maintain visual contact with the person inside the space and the attendant outside the space. Hot Sion Working inside a confined space could result in a person being subjected to heat stress. Confined space workers must be aware of the causes and symptoms of heat stress. Such workers must take actions to prevent heat stress as required by the F Temperature Stress Procedure. Oise Confined spaces tend to trap sound waves which can increase the intensity of sound. ° Where excessive continuous noise levels (above 85dB) exist, appropriate hearing protection,.shall be provided and used. Required hearing protection and eonversation actions axe detailed in the FI;p. Hearing Conservation Procedure. • Physical nezards Many physical hazards can be present in a confined apace. Sharp objects, powered equipment and slippery surfaces must be considered. Falls are another possible hazard in such spaces. Welding operations, drying paint/solvent or evaporating material can result in a changing atmosphere which can become toxic or explosive. Communiea gip•+ A method of co> cation, between the permit space worker and the attendant, must be established prior to the entry. This method shall be listed in the emergency/rescue procedures, reviewed at tailgate safety meetings and understood byall During the entry, the attendant will use the communication method to periodically inthe entry, person in the space. In the event appropriate check on the space, the attendant shall initiate evacuation or response is not received from the person in the emergency/rescue procedures. Aa a minimum,the following standard hand signals shall be used in high noise environments and in the event of the failure of normal communications: * Thumb Up Okay/I Understand * Thumb Down. No * Raised Clenched Fist..... Trouble * Hind Grips Throat Need Help Quick/Need Air * Throat Slash. Shutdown Equipment * Raised Circling Finger.,. Start Equipment Att*rdpnts shall be provided with a whistle or air horn to be used to get the attention of person(s) in the space. The following signals shall be used; * One 1 Second Blasts Look At Me * Two 1 Second Blasts Stop Working * Three I Second Blasts Evacaate TRAINING jExn jovee All employees will be trained in space entry and emergency procedures prior to entering a permit space. Prior to each entry, these procedures shall be reviewed at the tailgate safety meeting. Attendants shall be trained in observation methods, communication procedures, the use of provided equipment and emergency/rescue procedures. All persons shah become familiar with the exposure symptoms listed in Attachment D. $upervisoj All supervisors of employees who might supervise wiry into a space shall be trained in the requirements of this procedure, permitting procedures, ventilation mettrods, energy isolation (LO/TO) procedures, supervising respiratory protection, lnr kj. procedures. g procedures and rescue - -.. DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS Due to the serious nature of confined or permit space entries, deviations from established entry procedures will not be tolerated, Any violation of these procedures shall result in an immediate suspension from work for the violator, Within five working days a review of the action shall be completed by the violator's immediate supervisor, second-level manager and the safety coordinator. Based upon the acts and severity of the violation, disciplinary action Rhail be taken which could range from a minimum of five days suspension without pay to a maximima of termination. Any supervisor violating these procedures shall also be subject to the same review and disciplinary action. Such supervisor violations shall be reviewed by the supervisor's immediate manager, a higher level manager and the satcty coordinator, • . • Test atmosphere after lidicover is removed and the space is ventilated but prior to entry,and every 112 hour during prolonged occupancy. Test before re-entry after space has been vacated longer than 1I4 hour. Calibrate gas detectors with Oxygen,Methane(combustable),and with Carbon Monoxide(toxic). After cali- bration,any alarm during testing of a space means DO NOT enter the space or get out immediately. If entry MUST be made and you are unable to purge the space of toxic atmospheres then,with adequate respi- ratory device,entry may be made if: Carbon Monoxide: TWA-50 ppm/8 hours,STEL-300 ppm/15 minutes Hydrogen Sulfide: TWA-10 ppm/8 hours,SI'EL-20 ppm/10 minutes • TWA le time weighted average STET,-short term exposure limit * • * Record test readings for upper/middle/lower levels of the space * a * nun an= Toxic Comhvgtahtes Upper !Middle Ltimrs Upper !Middle i Lower upper /Middle f Lower • I I -I i I _ --. _ �-t_ I I I I Testing done by: Supervisor route copy of completed permit to safety director ®na► This permit expires at the end of the work shift or earlier if so stated on the reverse of this form. Permit is to be held by the stand-by person who is to remain at the confined space entrance for the entire confined space work time and is not to leave for any reason during the confined space work. , . Permit is to be revoked imri ediately if atmospheric conditions change,unacceptable levels or if any other problem arise which were not anticipated in pre-entry briefing. Permit revoked. Reason: _ Permit revoked by(signature): • • PERMIT-SPACE DECISION FLOW CHART DOES THEkoLpCe CONTAIN.ANY NO PEarniT-REQUIRED CONFINED SPACEs7 sULr OTHER xjBtE . (b) OSHA STANOARpg A MM)HO sup YES • INFO EMPLOYEES (c)(2) • • NOWILL PERMIT-SPACES BE ENTERED? YES PREVENT EItPLaYiE EnrTaY • AS REQUIRED (c)(3) • WILL CONTf2AGTOR5 ENTER THE SPACE? YES NO TASK WILL BE COMIL.ETE0 • • OY CONTRACTOR EMPLOYEES. INFORM coNTRAcroa. (c)(8)(i-ill) CONTRACTOR CBTAIN INFO FROM HOST. (c)(8)(1.-ill) • BOTH CONTRACTOR AND HOST EMPLOYEES WILL ENTER THE NO SPACE? YES COORDINATE ENTRY OPERATIONS (o)(0)(1v)'(d)(ii) • PREVENT UNAjTHy I 0 ENTRY WILL HOST EMPLOYEES ENTER 70 Mt ENTRY TASKS? NO PREVE:NT TONIZEO ENTRY PERFORYES AND STOP .__.___.....___._____si GOES THE SPACE HAVE K • ' POTENTIAL HAZARDS? NQ --►.�T�7T A PERMIT-REQUIRED YES SPACE-STOP CAN THE HflZAR03 BE ELIMINATED? YES EmPLOYER NO i'lAYCtu55IFY "NON-PERMIT .•' (c)(7)Tp STOP o (Continue) Attachment A l r.. WILL CONTINUOUS FORCE! AIR ALONE IRAINTAIN A SAFE CONDITION FUR AN YES SPACE CAN BE ENTERED ENTRY INTO THE SPACE? UNDER (a)(5) - 5TUP NO . PitEPARE FOR ENTRY BY PERMIT PRocEou 1 ACCEPTABLE ENTRY CONDITIONS ' VERIFIED? (Teat results recorded, NO PEJ1IT NUT VALID UNTIL, space is isolated, entrants CONDITIONS MEET PERMIT prtperly equipped. rescuers SPECIFICATIONS available, etc.j ' YES .• PERMIT I e--Y AUTHORIZING SIGNATURE. ACCEPTABLE ENTRY EMERGENCY ENTRANT5�' CONDITIONS ARE MAINTAINED NO ♦,. EVACUATE. PEAIgIT IS VOID. THROUGHOUT THE ENTRY? EVALUATE PROGRAM. NO ENTRY • YES UNTIL P I5 MENDED. •. :/ ENTRY TASKS COMPLETED. PERMMIT RETURNED AND CANCELED. ---------i AUDIT PERMIT PROGRAM AND PERMIT BASED ON EVALUATION OF ENTRY By ENTRANTS, ATTENDANTS, PREPARERS AND TESTERS, ETC. • E . ATTENDANT DUTIES ATTENDANT DUTIES • • i•• NOT TAKE THE ASSIGNMENT UNLESS YOU ARE TRAINED. nor TAKE THE ASSICHNENT UNLESS YOU ARE TRAINED. _ r THOROUGHLY AWARE Of THE PERMIT REOUIREHENTS. E ENOROUGHLy AWARE OF rHOROuCHLY AWARE OF THE USE OF PROVIDED EQUIPMENT. 1- E THOROUGHLY AWARE OF THE USE HI PRQ�YtafO EQUIPMENT. 1.. If OW THE EMERGENCY PROCEDURES AND TELEPHONE NUHOERS. 4. NOW THE EMERGENCY PROCEDURES 'AND TELEPHONE NUMBERS. AWARE OF THE ACTUAL AND POTENTIAL SPACE HAZARDS. S. E AWARE OF THE ACTUAL AND POTENTIAL SPACE HAZARDS. f. AY AT YOUR POST WHEN THE SPACEIS OCCUPIED. INTAIN CONTACT WITH ENTRANT($ AT ALL TIMES. • TAY AT YOUR POST WHEN TH£ SPACE IS OCCUPIED. OW 1H1O IS IN THE SPACE AND AREA. INTWIO ISCO INCT E SP CE AND ARE . ALL TIRES. P THE AREA AROUND THE SPACE SECURE. • KNOW THE IS Iq THE SPACE AHD AREA.40. CUATE THE SPACE Jr: KEEP THE AREA AROUND INC SPACE SECURE. THE PERMIT !S VIOLATED. 1 . EVACUATE THE SPACE If:• -- ANY EXPOSURE SYMPTOMS ARE OBSERVED, -- THE PERMIT IS VIOLATED. -- AN UNCONTROLLED HAZARD OCCURS IN THE SPACE. -- ANY EXPOSURE UNCONTROLLED HAZARD AOE URSERNET, -- A HAZARDOUS CONDITION OCCURS OUTSIDE THE SPACE, OR -- AH AZADON IO OCCURS IN OUTSIDEDE SPACE. - YOU MUST LEAVE YOUR POSr FOR ANY REASON. HAZARDOUS VE rOUR POST TCFOR RA THE SPACE. OR II. N EDED THE RESCUEE TEAM. -- YOU HU�T 'l1*a4 YOUR FOR ANY REASON. II. �1'i�IEEENT s@MMON THE RESCUE TEAM. H ENTER.71tE SPAC£ ALONE. . ATTENDANT DUTIES ATTENDANT DUTIES NOT TAKE THE ASSIGNMENT UNLESS YOU ARE TRAINED. • E THOROUGHLY AWARE OF TILE PERMIT REOUIREMENTS. NOT TAKE THE ASSIGNMENT UNLESS YOU ARE TRAINED. • E 7HOROUt3HLY AWARE OF THE ITV PROVIDED ECIUIPNCNT. THOROUGNLY AWARE Or INC PERMIT RCOUIREHENTS. • NOW 711E EMERGENCY PROCEDURES AND-TELEPHONE tvUriBERS. E THOROUGHLY AWARE Of THE USE OF PROVIDED EQUIPMENT. • E AWARE Of 7H£ ACTUAL AND POTENTIAL, SPACE HAZARDS. NOw THE EMERGENCY PROCEDURES ARO TELEPHONE NUHRER5. • TAY AT YOUR POST WHEN THE SPACE IS OCCUPIED. • E AWARE OF THE ACTUAL ANq POTENTIAL SPLICE HAZARDS: • J$TAIN CONTACT WITH ENTRANT{S A7 ALL TIRES. TAY AT YOUR POST WHEN THE SPACE IS OCCUPIED. WHO IS IN THE SPACE AND AREA. AONTAIN CONTACT WITH ENTRANT{S AT ALL TINES. > ire: THE AREA AROUND THE SPACE SECURE. NOW THEf5 IM THE SPACE AND AREA. "1J UATE THE SPACE If: CEP THE AREA AROUND THE SPACE SECURE. "; -- THE PERtIIT t5 VIOLATED. 4f VALUATE THE SPACE tP: > -- ANY EXPOSURE SYMPTOMS ARE OBSERVED. I? PERMIT 15 VIOLATER, n -- AN UNCONTROLLED HAZARD OCCURS IN THE SPACE. -- ANY EXPOSURE SYMPTOMS ARE OBSERVED, ttI -- A HAZARDOUS CONDITION OCCURS OUTSIDE THE SPACE. OR -- AN UNCONTROLLED HAZARD OCCURS IN THE SPACE. 2 IL - YOU MUST LEAVE YOUR POST FOR ANY REASON. -- A HAZARDOUS•CONDITtON OCCURS OUTSIDE THE SPACE. OR � . 1J£EO£D. SUPIMOK THE RESCUE TEAM. -- YOU MUST•LEAVE YOUR POST FOR ANY REASON. 1 lIEYtJ( ENTER THE SPACE ALONE. 1. �,E.yEE : SUMMON THE RESCUE TEAM. IYEYE"{ ENTER THE SPACE ALONE. i7 G, , I POTENTIAL EFFECTS OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS OF HYDROGEN SULFIDE EXPOSURE IOXYGEN-DEFICIENT ATMOSPHERES PPM' Effects and Symptoms Time Oxygen Content Effects and Symptoms I 10 Permissible Exposure Level 8 Hours (% by Volume) St Atmospheric.Pressure) 50-100 Mild Eye Irritation. Mild Respiratory kritation 1 Hour _ 19-5% - Minimum permissible oxygen level. 200-300 Marked Eye Irritation, Marked 15-19% Decreased ability to work strenuous- Respiratory•irritation 1 Hour ly. May impair condition and may in- 500-700 Unconsciousness. Death B -1 Hour duce early symptoms in persons with 10o0 coronary, pulmonary, or circulatory or More Unconsctousness, Death Minutes problems. These values are approximate and,vary as to the 12-14% Respiration increases in exertion, Individual's slate of health and his physical activity. pulse up, impaired coordination, per- ception, judgment. 10-12% Respiration further increases in rate POTENTIAL EFFECTS OF and depth, poor judgment, lips blue. CARBON MONOXIDE EXPOSURE 8-10% Mental failure, fainting, unconscious- PPM` Effects and Symptoms Time • . ness, ashen face, blueness of lips, I 35 Permissle Exposure Level 8 Hours nausea, and vomiting. 200 Slight Headache, Discomfort 3 Hours t 6-8% 8 minutes, 100% fatal; 6 minutes, 4100 Headache, Discomfort 2 Hours 50% fatal; 4-5 minutes, recovery with 600 Headache, Discomfort 1 Hour D treatment. 1000-2000 Confusion, Headache, Nausea 2 Hours 4-6% Coma in 40 seconds, convulsions, 1000-2000 Tendency to Stagger 1 V Hours r 0 respiration ceases, death. 1000-2000 Bright Palpitation of the Heart 30 Min, _ 2000-2500 Unconsciousness 30 Min. m These values are approximate and vary as to the , 4000 Fatal less Than 1 Hour -r individual`s state of health and his physical activities. These values are approximate and vary as fo the , `M-"--- ---- — — Individual's slate of health and his physical activity. A. D. GENERAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION, INC. WORKPLACE INJURY AND ILLNESS PREVENTION PROGRAM SHOP DRAWING REVIEW • SUBMITTAL :11: C, JOB #: 0/-0 JOB NAME: 6117-44i4 geGde SECTION V: NO EXCEPTIONS TAKEN AMEND AND RESUBMIT ri RETURNED WTI-1 rl EXCEPTIONS NOTED PEVIEWED BY: D!!JE REVIEWED: DAM RETURNED: RESPONSIBILITY The Injury and Illness Prevention Program (IIP Program) administrator, Program Administrator has the authority and the responsibility for implementing and maintaining this IIP Program for Establishment Name Managers and supervisors are responsible for implementing and maintaining the IIP Program in their work areas and for answering worker questions about the IIP Program. A copy of this IIP Program is available from each manager and supervisor. COMPLIANCE All permanent and intermittent workers, including managers and supervisors, are responsible for complying with safe and healthful work practices. Our system of ensuring that all workers comply with these practices include one or more of the following checked practices: Informing workers of the provisions of our IIP Program. Evaluating the safety performance of all workers. Recognizing workers who perform safe and healthful work practices. Providing training to workers whose safety performance is deficient. Disciplining workers for failure to comply with safe and healthful work practices. COMMUNICATION All managers and supervisors are responsible for communicating with all permanent and intermittent workers about occupational safety and health in a form readily understandable by all workers. Our communication system encourages all workers to inform their managers and supervisors about workplace hazards without fear of reprisal. Upon hiring, management will identify any intermittent workers with special communication needs. Management will ensure that such a worker understands the safety and health requirements before being assigned to duties exposing them to workplace hazards. Our communication system includes one or more of the following checked items: New worker orientation including a discussion of safety and health policies and procedures. Review of our IIP Program. Workplace safety and heatlh training programs. Regularly scheduled safety meetings. Effective communication of safety and health concerns between workers and supervisors, including translation where appropriate. Posted or distributed safety information. A system for workers to anonymously inform management about workplace hazards. Our establishment has less than ten workers and communicates with and instructs workers orally about general safe work practices and with respect to hazards unique to each worker's job assignment. HAZARD ASSESSMENT Periodic inspections to identify and evaluate workplace hazards shall be performed by a competent observer in the following areas of our workplace: Periodic inspections are performed according to the following schedule: 1. When we initially established our IIP Program; 2. When new substances, processes, procedures or equipment which present potential new hazards are introduced into our workplace; 3. When new, previously unidentified hazards are recognized; 4. When occupational injuries and illnesses occur; 5. When we hire and/or reassign permanent or intermittent workers to processes, operations, or tasks for which a hazard evaluation has not been previously conducted; and 6. Whenever workplace conditions warrant an inspection. Periodic inspections consist of identification and evaluation of workplace hazards utilizing applicable sections of the attached Hazard Assessment Checklist and any other effective methods to identify and evaluate workplace hazards. ACCIDENT/EXPOSURE INVESTIGATIONS Procedures for investigating workplace accidents and hazardous substance exposures include: 1. Interviewing injured workers and witnesses; 2. Examining the workplace for factors associated with the accident/exposure; 3. Determining the cause of the accident/exposure; 4. Taking corrective action to prevent the accident/exposure from reoccurring; and 5. Recording the findings and corrective actions taken. HAZARD CORRECTION Unsafe or unhealthy work conditions, practices or procedures shall be corrected in a timely manner based on the severity of the hazards. Hazards shall be corrected according to the following procedures: 1. When observed or discovered; and 2. When an imminent hazard exists which cannot be immediately abated without endangering worker(s) and/or property, we will remove all exposed workers from the area except those necessary to correct the existing condition. Workers necessary to correct the hazardous condition shall be provided with the necessary protection. TRAINING AND INSTRUCTION All permanent and intermittent workers, including managers and supervisors, shall have training and instruction on general and job-specific safety and health practices. Training and instruction can be provided through a brief on-site safety meeting. Any training and instruction shall be provided as follows: 1. When the IIP Program is first established; 2. To all new workers, except for construction workers who are provided training through a construction industry occupational safety and health training program approved by Cal/OSHA; 3. To all workers given new job assignments for which training has not previously provided; 4. Whenever new substances, processes, procedures or equipment are introduced to the workplace and represent a new hazard; 5. Whenever the employer is made aware of a new or previously unrecognized hazard; 6. To supervisors to familiarize them with the safety and health hazards to which workers under their immediate direction and control may be exposed; and 7. To all workers with respect to hazards specific to each worker's job assignment. Workplace safety and health practices for all industries using intermittent workers include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Explanation of the employer's IIP Program, emergency action plan and fire prevention plan, and measures for reporting any unsafe conditions, work practices, injuries and when additional instruction is needed. 2. Use of appropriate clothing, including gloves, footwear, and personal protective equipment. 3. Prevention of musculoskeletal disorders, including proper lifting techniques. 4. Information about chemical hazards to which workers could be exposed and other hazard communication program information. 5. Availability of toilet, hand-washing and drinking water facilities. 6. Provisions for medical services and first aid including emergency procedures. In addition, we train all workers about the checked applicable items found in the attached List of Training Subjects. • RECORDKEEPING We have checked one of the following categories as our recordkeeping policy. Category 1. Our establishment has twenty or more workers; has a workers' compensation modification rate of greater than 1.1 and is not on a designated low hazard industry list; or, is on a designated high hazard industry list. We have taken the following steps to implement and maintain our IIP Program: 1. Records of hazard assessment inspections, including the person(s) or persons conducting the inspection, the unsafe conditions and work practices that have been identified and the action taken to correct the identified unsafe conditions and work practices, are recorded on a hazard assessment and correction form; and 2. Documentation of safety and health training for each worker, including the worker's name or other identifier, training dates, type(s) of training, and training providers are recorded on a worker training and instruction form. We also include the records relating to worker training provided by a construction industry occupational safety and health program approved by Cal/OSHA. Inspection records and training documentation will be maintained according to the following checked schedule: For one year, except for training records of workers who have worked for less than one year which are provided to the worker upon termination of employment; or Since we have less than ten workers, including managers and supervisors, we only maintain inspection records until the hazard is corrected and only maintain a log of instructions to workers with respect to worker job assignments when they are first hired or assigned new duties. Category 2. Our establishment has fewer than twenty workers and is not on a designated high hazard industry list. We are also on a designated low hazard industry list or have a workers' compensation experience modification rate of 1.1 or less, and have taken the following steps to implement and maintain our IIP Program: 1. Records of hazard assessment inspections; and 2. Documentation of safety and health training for each worker. Inspection records and training documentation will be maintained according to the following checked schedule: For one year, except for training records of workers who have worked for less than one year which are provided to the worker upon termination of employment; or Since we have less than ten workers, including managers and supervisors, we maintain inspection records only until the hazard is corrected and only maintain a log of instructions to workers with respect to worker job assignments when they re first hired or assigned new duties. Category 3. We are a local governmental entity (any county, city, or district, and any public or quasi-public corporation or public agency therein) and we are not required to keep written records of the steps taken to implement and maintain our IIP Program. LIST OF TRAINING SUBJECTS We train our workers about the following checked training subjects: AGRICULTURE PRODUCTION AND FARM LABOR AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES (SIC Codes: 0111-0119,0131-0139, 0161, 0171-0179,0191, 0721-0724, 0761-0762) Safe practices for operating any agricultural equipment, including procedures for cleaning, repairing, servicing and adjusting. Electrical hazards. Heat stress. Ergonomic hazards, including proper lifting techniques and working on ladders or in a stooped posture for prolonged periods at one time. Hazardous chemical exposures. Other job-specific hazards, such as HEAVY CONSTRUCTION AND SPECIAL TRADES CONTRACTORS (SIC Codes: 1611, 1721, 1751-1755, 1761, 1771) The employer's Code of Safe Practices. Good housekeeping, fire prevention, safe practices for operating any construction equipment, including procedures for cleaning, repairing, servicing and adjusting. Safe access to working areas. Protection from falls. Electrical hazards, including working around high voltage lines. Crane operations. Trenching and excavation work. Proper use of powered tools. Ergonomic hazards, including proper lifting techniques. Other job-specific hazards, such as PRESERVED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES MANUFACTURING AND SUGAR AND CONFECTIONERY PRODUCTS (SIC Codes: 2032-2038, 2061-2068) Guarding of belts and pulleys, gears and sprockets, and conveyor nip points. Machine, machine parts, and prime movers guarding. Lock-out/tag-out procedures. • Materials handling. Ergonomic hazards, including proper lifting techniques. Noise. Other job-specific hazards, such as GENERAL MERCHANDISE, FOOD AND APPAREL STORES AND PHOTOGRAPHIC AND TAX PREPARATION (SIC Codes: 5311, 5399, 5441, 5499, 5632, 5651, 7221, 7291) Ergonomic hazards, including proper lifting techniques. Materials handling. Other job-specific hazards, such as HAZARD ASSESSMENT CHECKLISTS The following checklists contain safety and health hazard assessment items commonly found in the workplace. It is the employer's responsibility to identify, evaluate and control job-specific safety and health hazards in the workplace, and to meet all applicable Cal/OSHA requirements. The following checklists are to be used as guides in identifying safety and health hazards in your workplace. Answer the questions contained in the General Workplace checklist and then identify and answer the questions contained in the checklist that applies to your specific industry. GENERAL WORKPLACE (SIC Codes: All ) 0 Is the Cal/OSHA poster Safety and Health 0 Are restrooms and washrooms kept clean and Protection on the Job displayed in a prominent sanitary? location where all workers are likely to see it? ❑ Are workers instructed in the proper manner of ❑ Do you have a written, effective Injury and Illness lifting heavy objects? Prevention Program? ❑ Is there a list of hazardous substances used in your ❑ Are all work areas properly illuminated? workplace? ❑ Are workers instructed in proper first aid and other 0 Is there a written hazard communication program emergency procedures? dealing with Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) labeling, and worker training? ❑ Do you have a fire prevention'plan? ❑ Is each container for a hazardous substance (i.e. Cl Are all worksites clean and orderly? vats, bottles, storage tanks,) labeled with product identity and a hazard warning (communication of ❑ Are all spilled materials or liquids cleaned up the specific health hazards and physical hazards)? immediately? ❑ Is there a Material Safety Data Sheet readily ❑ Do you have eye wash facilities and a quick drench available for each hazardous substance used? shower within the work area where workers are exposed to injurious corrosive materials? ❑ Is there an worker training program for hazardous substances? ❑ When lunches are eaten on the premises, are they eaten in areas where there is no exposure to toxic 0 Can the work be performed without eye strain or materials or other health hazards? glare to the workers? ❑ Are aisles and passageways kept clear? 0 Does the task require prolonged raising of the arms and does the neck and shoulders have to be ❑ Are the directions to exits, when not immediately stooped to view the task? apparent;marked with visible signs? ❑ Are there pressure points on any parts of the body ❑ Are hazardous substances identified which may (wrists, forearms, back of thighs)? cause harm by inhalation, ingestion, skin absorption or contact? 0 Are there sufficient rest breaks, in addition to the regular rest breaks, to relieve stress from • ❑ Are workers aware of the hazards involved with repetitive-motion tasks? the various chemicals they may be exposed to in their work environment, such as ammonia, 0 Are tools, instruments and machinery shaped, chlorine, epoxies, caustics? positioned and handled so that tasks can be performed comfortably? ❑ Is personal protective equipment provided, used and maintained wherever required? ❑ Are you keeping the required records and documentation? ❑ Are there written standard operating procedures 0 Have arrangements been made to maintain for the selection and use of respirators where required records for the legal period of time? • needed? HAZARD ASSESSMENT CHECKLISTS HEAVY CONSTRUCTION AND SPECIAL TRADES CONTRACTORS (SIC Codes: 1611, 1721, 1751-1755, 1761, 1771) ❑ Are workers knowledgeable about and complying 0 Are floor openings guarded by a standard railing with the employer's Code of Safe Practices. and toeboards or cover? ❑ Are safe practices for operating construction 0 Are elevator shafts in which cages are not installed equipment, including procedures for cleaning, and which are not enclosed with solid partitions repairing,servicing and adjusting, being followed?. and doors guarded on all open sides by standard • ❑ Is good housekeeping maintained in all work areas, railings and toeboardsl passageways,and stairs in and around buildings or 0 Are workers adequately protected when working other structures? on temporary floors? ❑ Are all personal protective devices maintained in a 0 Are scaffolds provided for all work that cannot be safe, sanitary condition, and in accordance with done safely by workers standing on permanent or manufacturer's instructions? solid construction at least 20 inches wide, except where such work can be safely done from ladders? ❑ Are approved safety glasses required to be worn at all times in areas where there is a risk of eye 0 When scaffolds are used, are they properly injuries such as punctures, abrasions, contusions constructed in accordance with Cal/OSHA Article or burns? 22? ❑ Are hard hats provided and worn where danger of 0 When work is performed from thrustouts or similar falling objects exists? locations,such as trusses, beams purlins, or plates a to of 4-inch nominal width, or greater, at elevations ❑ Are hard hats inspected periodically for damage exceeding 15 feet above ground, water surface, or the shell and suspension system? floor level below and where temporary guardrail protection is impracticable, are workers using ❑ Is appropriate foot protection required where there approved safety belts or harnesses with attached is the risk of foot injuries from hot, corrosive, lanyards? poisonous substances, falling objects, crushing or penetrating actions? 0 Are all tools and equipment (both, company and worker-owned)used by workers at their workplace ❑ Are all applicable safety precautions, practices, in good condition? being used prior to and during entry into any excavation? 0 Are power tools used with the correct shield; guard or attachment recommended by the ❑ Are appropriate protective devices utilized where manufacturer,portable crcular saws equipped with ap • plicable in the excavation? guards above and below the base shoe and ❑ Are competent and qualified personnel used when checked to assure they are not wedged up, thus leaving the lower portion of the blade unguarded? blasting is required? 0 Are all cord-connected, electrically-operated tools ❑ Are workers protected from electrical hazards? and equipment effectively grounded or of the ❑ Are the minimum number of toilets and washing approved double insulated type? facilities provided and are they clean and sanitary? 0 Are ground-fault circuit interrupters provided on all temporary electrical 15 and 20 ampere circuits, ❑ Are portable metal ladders legibly marked with used during periods of construction? signs reading 'CAUTION" 'Do Not Use Around Electrical Equipment" or equivalent wording? 0 Are only authorized and trained personnel condition, and permitted to use welding, cutting or brazing ❑ Are all ladders maintained in goodequipment? are workers instructed to face the ladder when ascending or descending and not to use the top 2 0 If cranes are used are they visually inspected for steps of ordinary stepladders as a step? defective components prior to the beginning of any work shift and is a preventive maintenance 0 Are workers prohibited from using ladders that are program established? broken, missing steps, rungs, or cleats, broken side rails or other faulty equipment? ❑ Are cranes of such design,that the boom could fall over backward, equipped with boomstops? HAZARD ASSESSMENT AND CORRECTION RECORD Date of Inspection: Person Conducting Inspection: Unsafe Condition or Work Practice: Corrective Action Taken: Date of Inspection: Person Conducting Inspection: Unsafe Condition or Work Practice: Corrective Action Taken: Date of Inspection: Person Conducting Inspection: Unsafe Condition or Work Practice: Corrective Action Taken: WORKER TRAINING AND INSTRUCTION RECORD WORKER NAME TRAINING DATES TYPE OF TRAINING TRAINERS ACCIDENT/EXPOSURE INVESTIGATION REPORT Date & Time of Accident: Location: Accident Description: Workers Involved: Preventive Action Recommendations: Corrective Actions Taken: Manager Responsible: Date Completed: i]vlil oy i i,C,Nvil Oi vv vv1Y6'nivl s JivJ�� �.+�� � r,..J .. •- �+�- .,1 - • tiY 1 1 Al=2 I 5400 NARPER ROAD. SOLON. OHIO 44139 PHONE 7,16-24$-2500. FAX; 216-248-1915 / 9293 (REFERENCE 1641 ) MANUFACTURER ' S TABULATED DATA for TREN — SHORE ® (ALUMINUM HYDRAULIC VERTISt—miCisliS; - E�' ® SUBMITTAL#: JOB Revised November 15, 1 993 JOB NAMF: LO (Superseoes previous dcio) 1 SECTION NO EXCEPTIONS TAKEN i � i L_13 AMEND AND RESUBMIT u RETURNED WITH '// ' EXCEPTIONS NOTED } —®� REVIEWED BY: � 6 IV-38 a`I w:1 `I : m�1� i 1993 Allied Printed in U.SA I I T E > 1641 Irta�. en.....!„, I./ 4..• , I • • • •-••••••e7.::i • • . Ay. Alf(if: • TABLE OF CONTENTS (REFERENCE 1641 ) 1 .0 Statement of Scope Page 1 2..0 Planning & Preparation 3.0 Definitions (OSHA) • TABLES: Table 1—A, Type "A" Soil Page 4 ,. Table 1—B Type Soil, :Page 4' Table I Free "Standing Page 5 • _ • • Typical'. 111. tallatibii.:.'Figures .Page. 6 . . • 1.99,3 Allied Printed in'..U:Sdk REF t64 ; . • •.: - • • " : • :...;;.: . ; , 0e11� oy. Inc,han Or r..'U ,VJVIrhiIVIj II woe rq;Deij Aug-o, -uu e;04rIYli r'dye J/y 5900 Harper•Road,SQivn,:Ohio 44139 USA . . • Taitophone .(21;0) 248-.000�'C'el ( x;2413-1915J9298 ::. • . • • 414. •OU"�UNEO l AANUFACTU tER' f TABULATO . DATA,: ...WO INCH ALUMINUM l fYi' U UG VERTICAL SHORING '("t" W i..SHOR 1.0 Statement ol.Scope:.This padcag.of Info hiatton.cormOpd es Ailied's Manufactured tab+ fated data based ori.fard#fal regiliations, CFR PART 1'g 6 OSHA Subpart 'P . izxcavettions; Alfed aluminum hydraulic verticaf shoring, Trap;Share, is provided as' a ._Method...of Pr y. •against .treenoll save-ins•. In_trenches of designated'depths in•specified soil ootidliions. • .. 1.1 The inforrnatton containedwithin tnis.pa it age shall be'used by the d+eeign d "cols peterit"p erson arid'qua1ffle 'person whereappli ►ie: iti's important:ta refer tot.,these tiles during•job planning erd prepearr on; end`during installation, 1:2 A•copy c `brie data•shall'be:at eat Job site.here Allied Tren-Shores'are being • used., •Thlis.is re juired by.,..pip*, 1.,3 • Thfis inibrm a is•Ito•be used:precieeiy'ea st ite l'i afl in g proddu meU ufa red• • :only by Allied Any:de'vimson f om;this dates:Unleitit doviredtiy OSHA``re guta#lor e, . could results i'rs non=compli•erne,:Injury Or death::: 1 A This.ta leted data:superse:les:that which.has.beer'+ previous released:by Allied • and:teicee precedence dyer those subjects which.aree contlir ing:.writh 29 CFR Part : 112& Arty,topics'not;covered.by this tabuiat d•data shall'be governed by.ostiA• Tagiitotiorts: . 1,5: PiiQr•to:,usin th t:itables• wrtti .: q � in, this rp+ete►nt paersatl shall lytv+e a:tharrwgh. 'icno gge of the ,sections and: appendices of 'CF'R .Part 1<Si�, P Subpacrt,. , `l articuilar'ly Appendices A, D,.:+antd F.. .140 protectly system prop fs aprit� tors:all- applioitI ons,�.lhus ra4rti+ tedge of alterrr a lees su•gge steed, To obtain:a copy.a? • .OSHA's.federal r u.liati+ +s aeiiita►ct Alai`. tiie nearest OSHA c oe Samar• states :mays have adopted:additiO• •:r gula ons whic h g0:beyond the fed•eral rei•elation s. • Cantalct your.state•01910.,:to:"insure oral:are:in•compliance:.witCr all'•.,raguLa ons. . • • .1.S For .do ditiOn either tfi i ri .it'Epiee covered :by this..tabulated data'•or OSHA`s :r •ulatiorte, an engineered system, deeigned fbr the a picenon, Is;;risquirec. Contact troott state registered:prolessional''eng veer for design and oersfi tior.. 2.0 Planning and Preparation: 2.1 Iry Order to use the::data:tabul:ated•in.his pacriie , to sail type or types •preseryt at on:excavation site must:•first:be:deleterminedd u it glie soli::diessiiiCetie n methods • •set forth in Apperndix A•of Subpart . • .. Pg; ivt • 2.2 ' Free standing "Ca s il:' #e.tatrnirlatign hall be c ni#uctad by a "quaUecf° perm, . Th+e :"oompeten:t"• peragri:.aha t 'a sa t with;thts':d tarmiraa on 't�+i competent peltorti shalltheir coriiirruaily mbrrr irrr tlta tr .ch x:' igns • 23 If•d• eterioratian:.ls'evldenn't,•ail persotnnel shall va the: trend: The:`c�ueilitied" person shalt determine:Ina :oorrectli action r7:ec :.tc� rn�ure sale wc�rkin$ condition This.;may'requiii an 'alternative method of sprateation apprbpriete'for tfi r9'deteriorated".t onditfofs:: • • 2.4 Special.atten vii shall be gla en tco tthe sheeting..:,during: this{ monitoring•.process. If any defcrrnation. occurs:,'such:ara bowing or:bulging,:all;personnet,shall vacate the trench and the silue1lon-corrected:.as stated':above, sprier to resuming work. • 2..5 Trench faces•snails be•verttoal. The uprights.:shell beer.against a turn, straight surface, This Is required:to insure'•ey1ihder'pressure is distributed to:ltte soil: • • 2.5 Vertical lioads shalt'not.be:.atppifed tee:cross:.braces. • . 2.7.. Sheetin+shall b a'an C BI r pprYov i.Plywood 1 1: ck softw or•o:1e° thick;.14 ply, aroticYwhite:birch ("f irnn •Form'.or Finnish'::Form £:1]). • 2.$ .Sheeting dill' than that speafied, l,e., a eel plate, must lae cart fled by the msritrfaact.arrer/supplier of ttae°:::material to ;insure.;.streng h of :the she'ettng;'Is equtivalettt to:or exceeds the streng r. f the plyv ood spect:itatt; .Sheeting shalt tom: • paitoned.to tfteybottt ti:.:of the:.#renc O l't rf the shgedrrg ie,:too heavy;to rrrstaal<.by :. hen This.."t11 0minateth change.: artppatg>ir .'sheeting• `e sucpendedd::asp from the tenth floor. .•_ . .243 :Sheeting shall be used for''free fan ding yOw asoil piIL�8ltfons as.d Tibet#err.fabler 1 C�, • Sheeting shou•ld,•,be• used In:Ty•per "A' and'."B' 'eels There spallling:'.•or sloughing occurs. 2.10 Usage of sheetingll wi only.prevent ttre:soil'from spelling.onto working.'surfaces . •' and. provides'.for a fiat: ssurfaces which'..thee: vertical.shares can.,.bear .against. Backfilling sheeting may. be. required,..especially. up' near the ,grade line,• A contoured trench fa4c a can:cause rail bend.ing,'lt exiessive: ,.Be careful not to ilex. . • the sheeting.while'bat cfliting, . • • 2.1:1 Only two (2).shores.are required Within':a trench provided the length oi°tt a trench . does not exceed the matximam:h'Orizontai'spac n. appropriate:for;the.soil type and • . enchs depth. Pieter to the tables, Where.orily°twwo(21.:shores area used or.when • work. Is being. performed near the end. of as trench, the.ends Shall be sloped'or shored appropriately. • [1]r, Plywood '& Door manufacturers Corp. - • • 2.12 Keep the .trench free of.y ter, Diverts surface water away.tom., the ,trench, • Remember even after Water has been pumped:out of a trench, the.soil subjected to.the water,may.be.damp.:"Damp soil, especially ed the bottom of a trench shall be monitored closely lbr signs of instability. Do not use vertical shores in saturated soli applications. Refer to alternative. systems.. 3.0 Definitions as stated by OSHA in 29 CFR Peat 1928: 3,1 -"Competent person means one who is capable of iden.tifying:.existing and predictable hazards in the. surroundings, or wortcirng conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous,.or dangerous to employees, and who has authorizatlon to take prompt corrective measures to eliminate them," 3.2 "Cross braces mean the horizontal members of a shoring system installed . perpendicular to the sides of the excavation, the ends of which bear against either uprights or wales," l.,e. • hydraulic cylinders 3,3 "Faces or sides means the vertical or included earth surfaces formed as a result of excavation work." • 4." : 3.4 • "Cu'nlified" means'one who, by possession of arecognized degree, certificate, or professional.standing,.or.who by':extensive knowledge, training,.and'experience, has..successfully demonstrated his ability.ta solve or.resot :problems'related to the subject matter,:the work,.or the project • 3.5 'Shall means mandatory," 3.6 "Sheeting means the members of a shoring system that.r+amain the earth in position • and in tun supported by other members of the shoring system." 3,7 "Should means recommended.' • 3.8 "Shoring mews a. structure.:such as a metal,hydraulic, mechanical.or timber shoring system that supports the sides of an excavation and which is designed to prevent cave-ins." 3.9 °Uprights means that ,vertical members of .a .trench shoring system.placed in contact with the .eart se d.usually positioned so that .Individual•:members.are closely spaced, in contact with or interconnecting.to each other,ere often called "sheeting." For installation procedures refer to'theQperatian,,installletion,:Selmoeand Safety Manuai.. All personnel involved with the installation process shail'be knowledgeable and practiced ' in the proper usage of Allied's vei bcetl'shoring, Contest the factory regarding any of the ...r'�- subjects covered in this issue. Pg. 3c$ 6 uy . nc,vvn on✓ni wu ,QMr,,ivi , aluodioDel , Huy-a—uU �:a8-$P., rage 5Jy 1 l iii. .,- --. . �TA`BLE 1 --A, TYPE "A" SOIL AfIll-FD ..(fquivolerl.t weigh# •effect of 25 st er foot P of.depth) CROSS 'BRACE, (Note 1) . TRENCH — TREN CH WIDTH (FEET) DEPTH UP TO 10 FT: 10 TO 12 F';, . SHEETING - MAXIMUM SPACING See: 2.7 .cad (FEET) MAXIMUM SPACING ' 2.41 on pg•2HORIZONTAt VERTICAL HORIZONTAL VETCAL 0TO10 8 . 8 10 TO 15 . . g' � S Note 2 4 4 . dt.. 15 TO .20 7.5 6 Note 5 '2O TO 25 5 .Type "A" soil as'clescrFbed by OSHA, " means cohesive :soil with con unconfined compressive ' strength of 7.5'tons per square foot (tsf) ('t 44kPa) or greater." Refer to. 29 •CFP•:Port 1926 Subpart P for complete soil description to include cohesive soil exarmples. and external factors which may.cause o Type "A" soil to be classified as a less stable sail type. (a): Heavy or extra Heavy Duty Shores shall be used of these'depths. TABLE .1' —B, TYPE 'a B'.' SOIL (Equivalent' weight effect .of'45 psf,per foot of depth). CROSS 'BRACE: (Note'..#) TRENCH WIDTH (FEET) • TRENCH ~"°....-.--� �. DEPTH UR TO 10 'FT.. 10 TO 12 FT. SHEEi1N{; MAXIMUM SPACING Sas.2.7 and(FEI r) •IAxlt�uria SPACING HORIZONTAL. VERTICAL 2,$ on'pg.2 HORIZONTAL VERTICAL' 0 TO 1.0 S 7 • 10 TO 15' E 4 5' Note 2 —�;. sk ..:' Note . 4 Type 8" soil,' as described by 'OSHA ' means cohesive Soil' with an unconfined compressive strength greater than 0.5 tsf (48 kPa). but less than .1.5 tsf (144.kPQ).• Refer to 29 .:CFR Part 1926,.. Sub,Cort P.for complete soil description to .include`cahesionlessg'..soils that: ..would be' classified. as 1y a "e'°''soil, pod other, contributing factors which w, ultl;:ae3ignate a',pertiauldr soil as Type sr, (Notes for these tables ore found on Page 5 of. st/ ... , '..#. *' REF: 1:647 . c4ilc-. Page 4af6 Rtrv. '.7 I/S3: Obil Dy. IfI CIVVn Dn Vn iiVV vVIVli hI' I JIVOCIOLI , fi4y-O VV G.JOr h, fayc r / 7 ' BE 1 -� C I. FREE STANDING C SOIL ' 4. CROSS BRACE: (Note i). M { TRENCH WIDTH (FEET) TRENCH . DEPTH UP TO 10 FT, 10 TO 12 FT. SHEETING (FEET) MAXIMUM SPACING . MAXIMUM SPACING See 2.7 and ,---� 2,a on pg.2 HORIZONTAL VERTICAL HORIZONTAL VERTICAL o To to `�-- Notes:. 10 TO 15 44 4 4. 4, 3, 6, & 7 Free Standing 'C' soil is a moist dense sand or a moist cohesive soil which is not fluid nor submerged. Free Standing 'C' also includes soil which would :initially be. classified ds. Type 'B' but becomes subjected to external factors which cause 'the. soil to be classified as a less stable soil type. This includes soils that hove been subjected to moisture from thawing or light ruin but .where the trench has 'been pumped,free of collected water and there ore no sighs of deterioration. Should signs of deterioration become evident the 'quoiitled' person' shall reassess the conditions to insure the Installed.vertical shoring is still appropriate and sufficient Once excavated, the trench' walls .shall.be "free stonding", unsupported for at least' the time it•takes: to properly install the entire 'shoring system. The integrity of the trench. must be insured through continuous observation, Refer to Table 1 -C for specific. depths and spacings. . ("): ivy or Extra. Heavy Duty Shores shall be used for this application.. NOTES: r. Two inch :inside diameter cylinder(s) with standard extension;< veld owersJeewes as required. 2. Sheeting Jr. required if spoiling or sloughing'is evident See 2.8 on page 2 if sheeting other thon approved plywood is desired, 3. Plywood sheeting may be positioned two'feet from the trench bottom In' this soil type. 4. Solid sheeting required, no gaps.between sheeting. 5. Sheeting shpil' extend to the bottom of the..trench. 6. The bottom cross brace. of the shore shall be three:feet maxima 'from the bottom 7: The roil' 'of the shorty►.Shall 'extend to one.foot maximum from the bottom of.the trench. REF, f 64 1' 1: ,,:1 , � - 1 + Page 5:of 6 Revs, 1 f/9;3'. :. ..:... a. 4 0111 16' ice'NO. F MAW QR 2 J __ r '. r 1.1 °I, Fig + 7nn—Shane I d l501;11 i® IT e Spoi 8eod� 0 2 (�r Plywood) 1.1 o i0100 iltr - 40 _ sots Ire srTO2r % TI'CA Rest , PER RCM RAY %WICAt -1 VERTICAL SPACING a CROSS MCC SPACING iSOIL MY 0 `' :OS MC( SOR Tiff A d 'i' ORGEM DSU UitiO �� 11PC% Mika VON a / �' ttnx. E ♦' MAX. ,� C at /ItCrJFibrtQ 110t 1� _ SpOa‘K7g vat/slotigkinit DrddNtC c _ SM to No 1-A ono! I-A ` Set fah F-A and i$ n r`.` o- _.j . F -`; , ' i ,,./,S* 10 PiT.:-\„Ni., rear so. 3 01* . . T ..2: dl ( Atstbod MORE MR I I' i 1+e is f l TRRR S�KXt a 7 ' 40 1 ° f Spur erocing I ;-i too" (stetting mondTaq� c. dig -'1:;' 0 ' kik Fr-- c 3 `4 9r TO 2-fIllr" Sdtar ci eSiO CAW i 1 ,ill.. .ileum IrtTi@Ci91'd T,�c ' ini R L I, .mil; i. F RAN SPACING i.' mot r C DACEsox Iti 'A' a 'N J'Thriat lP TElIlyTlrlit Et�EE STRONGC Sxs c_ a: ;' _ Spoiling cnd 9ioergbing cadent_ t' 'MX fiGN M 7AUAFA W 9.. MAI Sae foixim f-A ani 1-8 as . �:' See Wit I-C I :.y.'. • CAUOSHA Article 6, Section 1539-1547 • ..1999 a:fit/on ARTICLE 6 • 1. .. EXCAVATIONS 1538.PERMITS,For regulations relating to Ptu,iias for excavations and trenches,refer to the California Code of Regulations Title 8, Chapter 3?Article 2,Section 341 ethos California Occupational Safety and Health Regulations(CAL/OSHA). NOTE Authority CilA t Sachem 14.3,Labor.04db,R.l rt,r. Sermon 142,3,Labor Code, • 1540.EXCAVATIONS. (a) Scope and Application. This article applies to all open excavations made in the.earth's surface. Excavations are defined to .mctude trenches, Ott',Definitions Applksibia to this Article, Ad *&entering Practices means those requirements which are compatible with =dards of practice required by a registered professional engineer, ' • •41un inunr.Hydraal&c Shoring,A pre-engineered shoring system comprised of aluminum hydraulic cylinders(crossbraces)used in conjunction with vertical rails(uprights)or horizontal rails(wafers). Such system is designed specifically to support the sidewalls of an exeavation and prevent cave-ins. Bell-borrow Peer Hole,A type of shaft or footing excavation,the bottom of which is.made larger than the cross section above to form a belled shale, 5 aching(Benching )xrurri. A method of protecting employees from cave-ins by excavating the sides of an excavation to form one or a series of horizontal levels or steps,usually with vertical or near-vertical surfaces between levels. Cave-in. The'separation of a mass of soil or rock material from the side clan excavation,or the loss of soil frum under a trench shield or support system. and its sudden movement.into the excavation, either by tailing or sliding, in sufficient quantity so that it could entrap.bury.or otherwise injure and immobilize a person, Crossbraces,The horizontal members of a shoring system installed perpendicular to the sides of the excavation,the ends of which bear against either uprights or wales. Excavation.Any man-made cut,cavity,trench,or depression in an earth surface,formed by earth removal. Fars or Sides,The vertical or inclined earth surfaces formed as a result ofexcavation•wok. Fathere.The breakage,.displacemertt,or permanent deformation of a structural member or connection so as to reduce its structural integity and its supportive capabilities. Nrrtarloes Ad,aospkere. An atmosphere which by reason of being explosive. flammable. poisonous, corrosive, oxidizing, • irritating,oxygen deficient,toxic,or otherwise harmful,may cause death,illness,or injury, A'icitoar,The accidental release or failure of a cross brace. Protective System.A method of protecting employees from cave-ins.from material that could fail or roll from an excavation face or into an excavatiom or from the collapse of adjacent structures. Protective systems include support systems, sloping and benching systems.shield systems.and other systems that provide the necessary protection. Ramp.A inclined walking or working surface that is used to gain access to one point'(rom another,and is constructed from earth or from structural materials such as steel or wood. Registered Professional Engineer. A person who is registered as a professional engineer in the state where the work is to be performed. However,a professional engineer, registered in any state is deemed to be a"registered professional engineer'' within the meaning of this standard when approving designs for"manufactured protective systems"or"tabulated data"to be used in interstate commerce, Sheehy.The members of a shoring system that retain the earth in position and in tuna are supported by other members of the shoring.system, • Shield(Shield System),:A strucuwe that is able to withstand tine forces imposed on it by a cave-in and thereby protect employees within the'structure. Shields can be permanent structures or can be designed tb be portable and moved along as wark •progresses,Additionally,shields can be either premenufncn+red or job-bulk in accordance with Section I 54I.1(c)(3)or(cX4). Shields used in'trenches are usually referral to as"match boxes"or"trench shields," Sl,arbrg{Shying Sj n),A structure such as a.metal hydraulic,mechanical or timber shoring System that supports the sides of an excavation and which is designed to prevent cave-ins. Sides,See"Faces." lee A.D.General Engineering Construction Inc., 2829 N.Glenoaks Blvd. 1 Burbank,Ca 91504 Phone(818) _7;8310.6/Fi 0 559 ax(818)559-5502 LOCAL STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) SHOP UsRAVVING 15,JEV-I*E.WThl, suevaTTAL 300 .4r. 303 NAME-: co/4'MA/ SECT tON NO EXCE-.PTIONS AMEND AND P,E,SUBMIT BETURN17:10 vr,‘,1 c3 \ EXCEPTIONS NOTED REVIEWED ESI t DATE DA,TE FETURNED: PURPOSE: • The purpose of the Local SWPPP is to: Identify all pollutants that may affect the quality of discharges of storm water associated with the construction activities of the job. Identify, construct and implement storm water pollution prevention measures to reduce the quantity of contaminated runoff and dealing with runoff in manner that minimizes environmental impact from site during construction and post construction. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES All construction equipment, supplies and materials will be stored at our rented yard. SEWAGE SPILL AND RESPONSE PLAN 1. A.D. will be in full charge and be responsible for the job site, the construction work of this contract, and subject to the directions of the Engineer and or the Inspector. 2. A.D. will observe and comply with all Federal, State, and Local Laws and ordinances, codes orders, and regulations which in any manner affect the conduct of the work, specifically as it relates to sewage spills. 3. A.D. will be fully responsible for preventing sewage spillage, containing any sewer spillage, recovery and legal disposal of any spilled sewage, any fines, penalties, claims and liability arising from negligently causing a sewage spillage and any violation of any law, ordinance, code, order, or regulation as a result of the spillage. 4. A.D. will exercise care not to damage existing public and private improvements, interrupt existing services and or facility operations which may cause a sewage spill. Any utility and or improvement which is damaged by A.D. will be immediately repaired by A.D's expense. In the event that A.D damages an existing utility, interrupts an existing service which causes a sewage spill, A.D. will immediately notify the City representatives. A.D. will request and obtain from the Engineer an emergency roster of the Designated City representatives with their respective phone numbers, pager numbers, and cellular phone numbers. A.D. will take all measures necessary to prevent further damage or service interruption and any resulting sewage spill(s). 5. If called for in the Plans and/or Specifications, or if a sewer bypass is needed to construct the project. A.D. will continuously monitor the flow levels downstream and upstream of the a construction location to detect any possible failure that may cause a sewage backup and spill. A.D. will include the means and methods of monitoring the flow in their Spill Response Plan. 6. In case of a sewage spill, A.D. will act, without instruction from the City, to control the spill and take all appropriate steps to contain it in accordance with their Spill Response Plan. A.D. will, within three working days from the occurrence of a spill, submit to the engineer a written confirmation describing the following information related to the spill;the location on the Thomas Guide Map; the nature and volume;the date and time; the duration;the cause; the type of remedial and/or cleanup measures taken and the date and time of implementation;the corrective and or preventive actions taken; and the water body impacted and results of any necessary monitoring. Requests for additional compensation for the handling of the spill will be submitted to the Engineer as a construction claim. The Engineer may institute further corrective actions, as deemed necessary, to fully comply with the existing law, ordinance, code order or regulation. A.D. will be responsible for all costs incurred for the corrective actions raised from A.D. negligence. 7. It will be A.D.'s responsibility to assure that the field forces, including subcontractors, know and obey all safety and emergency procedures, including the Spill Response Plan,to be maintained and followed at the job site. SEWER BYPASS 1. A.D. will provide temporary means to maintain and handle the sewage flow in the existing system as required to complete the necessary construction. 2. A.D. will prepare and submit a detail bypass plan to the engineer for approval. 3. A.D. will provide a bypass system designed to handle the peak flow of the system. A.D. will include a 100%backup in the bypass system. A.D. will utilize the backup system to mitigate and additional wet weather flows, perform the necessary maintenance and repairs on the bypass system, and exercise and ensure the operability of the backup system. Each pump, including the backup pumps, will be a complete unit with it's own suction and discharging pumping. 4. Prior to the full operation of the bypass system. A.D. will demonstrate to the satisfaction of the engineer that both the primary and backup bypass systems are fully functional and adequate, and will certify the same in writing to the Engineer in a manner acceptable to the Engineer. 5. A.D. will provide one dedicated fuel tank for every single pump/generator, if fuel/generator driven pumps are used. A.D. will provide a fuel level indicator outside each fuel tank. AD. will continuously(while in use) monitor the fuel level in the tanks and ensure that the fuel level does not drop below a level equivalent to Two Hours of continuous bypass system operation. 6. A.D. will provide an emergency standby power generator, if electric power driven pumps are used. 7. A.D. will continuously(while in use) monitor the operation of the bypass system and all impacted facilities. A.D. will submit as part of their bypass plan their monitoring procedure and frequency. A.D. will maintain a log of the monitoring in a manner acceptable to the engineer. 8. A.D. will continuously monitor the flow levels downstream and upstream of the bypass to detect any possible failure that may cause a sewage backup and spill. 9. A.D. will routinely inspect and maintain the bypass system, including the backup system. A.D. will submit as part of their bypass plan their maintenance procedures and frequency. A.D. will Maintain a log of all pertinent inspection, maintenance and repair records in a manner acceptable to the Engineer. SEWAGE SPILL TELEPHONE NOTIFICATION Should a sewage spill occur, A.D. will immediately report the incident to either ONE of these two City departments: Sewer Maintenance Services Fire Department Dispatch Center 911 A.D. will notify either City representatives such as Project Engineer, or Inspector, or if these are not available, A.D. will notify: The city will notify: LA County Department of Health Services, LA County Department of Public Works, Regional Water Quality Control Board. t ACTIVITY: VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT CLEANING • Objectives Housekeeping Practices Graphic: North Central Texas COG,1993 Contain Waste Minimize Disturbed Areas • Stabilize Disturbed Areas Protect Slopes/Channels (\ Control Site Perimeter Control internal Enosio DESCRIPTION Targeted Pollutants Prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to storm water from vehicle and equipment cleaning by using off-site facilities,washing in designated,contained areas only,eliminat- . 0 Sediment ing discharges to the storm drain by infiltrating or recycling the wash water, and/or 0 Nutrients training employees and subcontractors. Q Toxic Materials APPROACH Q 011& Grease • Use off-site commercial washing businesses as much as possible. Washing vehicles 0 Floatable Materials and equipment outdoors or in areas where wash water flows onto paved surfaces or 0 Other Construction into drainage pathways can pollute storm water. If you wash a large number of Waste vehicles or pieces of equipment,consider conducting this work at an off-site commer- cial business. These businesses are better equipped to handle and dispose of the wash � Likely to H . waters properly. Performing this work off-site can also be economical by eliminating Significant Impact the need for a separate washing operation at your site. 0 Probable Low or • If washing must occur on-site,use designated,bermed wash areas to prevent wash Unknown Impact water contact with storm water,creeks,rivers,and other water bodies. The wash area Implementation can be sloped for wash water collection and subsequent infiltration into the ground Requirements • Use as little water as possible to avoid having to install erosion and sediment controls for the wash area. Q Capital Costs • Use phosphate-free,biodegradable soaps. 0 O&M Costs • Educate employees and subcontractors on pollution prevention measures. Q Maintenance • Do not permit steam cleaning on-site. Steam cleaning can generate significant Train ing pollutant concentrations. • For a quick reference on disposal alternatives for specific wastes, see Table 4.2, 0 Suitability for CA40,Employee/Subcontractor Training. Slopes>59G REQUIREMENTS • Costs(Capital,O&M) All of the above are low cost measures. • Maintenance • High 0 Low - Minimal,some berm repair may be necessary. LIMITATIONS CA30 . • Even phosphate-free,biodegradable soaps have been shown to be toxic to fish before the soap degrades. • Sending vehicles/equipment off-site should be done in conjunction with ESC24 , (Stabilized Construction Entrance). Best REFERENCE Managemen 0 Swisher,RD., 1987.Surfactant Biodegradation,Marcel Decker Corporation Practices Construction Handbook 4 '- 24 _ March, 1993 ' • • ACTIVITY: EMPLOYEE/SUBCONTRACTOR TRAINING (Continue) • Consider posting the quick reference table around the job site or in the on-site office trailer to reinforce training. • Train employee/subcontractors in standard operating procedures and spill cleanup techniques described in the fact sheets. Employee/subcontractors trained in spill containment and cleanup should be present during the loading/ • unloading and handling of materials. • Personnel who use pesticides should be trained in their use..The Catifonnia Department of Pesticide Regulation and county agricultural commissioners license pesticide dealers,certify pesticide applicators,and conduct on-site inspections. • • Proper education of off-site contractors is often overlooked. The conscientious efforts of well trained employed subcontractors can be lost by unknowing off-site contractors,so make sure they are well informed about what they are expected to do on-site. • • • • • CA40 Beet Practices If Construction Handbook 4 - 29 March, 1993 A.D. General Engineering Construction Inc, ♦♦♦ 2829 N.Glenoaks Blvd.Ste 106/101 •Burbank,Ca 91504 Phone(818)559-7383♦Fax(818)559-5502 POLLUTION CONTROL-SEWAGE SPILL PREVENTION AND RESPONSE PLAN A. A.D.will be in full charge and be responsible for the job site,the construction work of this contract,and to the directions of the Engineer or the Inspector. B. A.D.will observe and comply will all Federal, State,and local laws,ordinances,codes,orders,and regulations which in any manner affect the conduct of the work, specifically as it relates to the sewage spills. C. A.D. will be fully responsible for preventing sewage spillage,containing any sewage spillage,recovery and legal disposal of any spilled sewage,any fines,penalties,claims, liability arising from the negligently causing a sewage spillage and any violation of any law,ordinance,code,order, or regulation as a result of the spillage. D. A.D. will exercise care not to damage public and private improvements interrupt existing services and/or facility operations which may cause a sewage spill. Any utility and/or improvement which is damaged by A.D. will be immediately repaired at A.D.'s expense. In the event that A.D. damages an existing utility, interrupts and existing service which causes an sewage spill,A.D.will immediately notify the City representatives. A.D. will request and obtain from the Engineer and emergency roster of the designated City representatives with their respective phone numbers,pager numbers,and cellular phone numbers. A.D.will take all measures necessary to prevent further damage or service interruption,to control,contain and clean up the resultant impacts of the damage, service interruption and any resulting sewage spill(s). E. In the case of a sewage spill,A.D. will act,without instruction from the city,to control the spill and take all appropriate steps to contain it. A.D. will immediately notify the City representatives of the spill and all actions taken. A.D. will,within three working days from the occurances of a spill,submit to the Engineer a written conformation describing the following information related to the spill:the location on the Thomas Guide map;the nature and volume;the date;the duration;the cause;the type of remedial and/or cleanup measures taken and the date and time of implementation;the corrective and/or preventive actions taken;and the water body impact and results of any necessary monitoring. Requests for additional compensation for the handling of the spill will be submitted to the Engineer as a construction claim. The Engineer may institute further corrective actions, as deemed necessary,to fully comply with the existing law,ordinance,code,order,or regulation. A.D. will be responsible for all costs incurred for the corrective actions raised from A.D.'s ne l.tgence - [ DRAW� " ISHOP DR u � 5N ; EViAAP�/ F. It will be A.D.'s responsibility to assure that the field forces know and obey a safety and emergency procedures. SUBMITTAL #: f JOB #: 01-00 JOB NAME: FO'JINNI 4 3-EWei- SECTION #: I NO EXCEPTIONS TAKEN F4. 1 AMEND AND RESUBMIT Ell RETURNED Wrn--E 0 EXCEPTIONS N cED !, REVIEWED kBY: _.... — _. — I F �. 8 c a.., 6 0 DATE RETURNED: _ --.- , Al. General Engineering Construction Inc., • .. • 2829 N.Glenoaks Blvd.Ste 106/101 • Burbank,Ca 91504 Phone-(8-18)559-7383• Fax(818)559-5502 EMERGENCY CONTACT LIST SCOTT SNYDER BRYAN KIER 943 UCLAN DRIVE 10209 STONEHURST AVE. BURBANK,CA-91504 SHADOW HILLS,CA 91040 OFFICE- (818) 559-7383 MOBIL-(626)379-7908 (818) 567-1070 MOBILE- (818) 395-9700 HOME-(818)252-1373 HOME- (818) 843-6697 JODIE SNYDER 943 UCLAN DRIVE BURBANK,CA 91504 OFFICE- (818) 559-7383 (818) 567-1070 MOBIL- (818)395-9701 SHOP D {f's,1G 1 EV HOME- (818) 843-6697 SUBMITTAL •Th 10 JOB 01 JOB NAME: f e4T1+41 seL— SECflON NO EXCEPTIONS TAKEN rt /WEND AND RESUBMIT ri RETURNED WITH ni EXCEPTIONS NOTED REVIEWED BY: DATE REVIEWED: DATE RETURNED: ; • ie CITY OF FO TANA STIR.MAINS 1 —Tun 31Jul1[Jul 2 JulJul0Ju111t'Ju117qu113Ju114'Ju1151u116Ju117,Ju11t3Ju119Ju12t3'Jul21Jul22Uu123Ju124UW25,1W2614127Ju1283u129Uulat9 Task Name 1 13uratlon I Su Ma l Tu We ( Th r Fr 1-Si Su j Mo Tu We J Th t Fr j Sa Sub Mo _Ty 1 We,_ Th f Fr L.Sa Su LNIo I Tu j ye ; Th L.Fr j Sa F Su j �14 ( Tu Ws.1 Th MDBtuzictok'_ ..,_.., .Y._... 5 days i- .,.,.." :r- 3 d .. i•: r j- •LAYOUT:POTHOLE • } EXCAVATE PIPI..NG WALNUT 7 days I i BACKFCt L1CC€ PAGTIC3NeT1=MP-PAVE 7 days EE CAVATE:PIPING-JUNIPER •16 days } BACKFILL,COMPACTION,TEMP-PAVE 16 days M.H:s,LATERALS 4 days TESTING,BASEPAVE 3 days a III .• [:• •.. i F.XGAVATE,PIPIkNG-HIGHLAND SIERRA 11 days t rft iir i�i days i ° JOL #: 4'(—b{4 I ry ri.H:s,1 ASEPAVE,TESTING 4d ! JOB I� , E: k rav 4 +.�. I.. • JSECTIONft: CAP PAVE 2 days t r.. .. NO EXCEPTIONS TAKENj MISC TASK'S:GEN:CLEAN UP 2days t _ liNiEN ! AND RESUBMIT 1 1 i ,, jr-T--- 1 DEMOBILIZE 2 days H • Task progress n, «� r+ � 4 ��TE��€i�f��7 �n� Project Progectl summery ( �` ' 4 EktemaITasks I M 12` g 1�ealltt&E TIQ ,,i N E Date:The sr251+?2 .. Split „i,,,,( , .1.,.,,(1,,,,,..,,. ,Milestone Project Summary ?� y External Milestone �°� /}A �.., q : . CITY OF FONTANA VJALDIUTtJUNIPERIIIIGHLAND SEWER MAINS Aug2.iikug 3Mg:4,lAug_69kug Sytug 7kktigug..,6.Ug 1 i ug tl ug'I ug I]ug I rug i i ug 1 l ug.1...Lug..:1_11.9...112.15 21.uglilig 2 1,.9249„2 l U0.241,1p21403.,1 pg 21 ug 2''ug 6...412_g 31SeplISN)21Sep 6 zriSeSISep..,giso nap q peg!"ep 14,_TileP 1 1!P I Fr r Sa i-Su ri'vlo l Tu I We.i Th I Fr Se L su i mo ---Tu Roo 1 -r4 ; Fri Sa i Su I Mo i Tu f We Th i Fr Sa I Su ditto E_TuWe I Trt Fr..J.Sa I SuTu i We J Th lir ' Sa . Su. Mo I Tu i We_. Th_i , .,.,.... .,..... . . :. : •.:.:::., • ....-.: _ :.--.. • : ; ! ... ' ;•:•:','..---,:•.... •.: . . :•:. •..:_-;7 ., : . •... .. . . , ,.. . . 1 :-. :•••:',• • 1 . : .....,..,...,.....:- . • '' • - • ... .. . .., ....., • . • : : . ....::::.. . . . .. . . ... . .' • •• . . • • • . . . . . • ..,. . • ••...-,:-.• • : : -: . : .::• • . • I • • ' • "• '' • . ..,... , • •.: .:. . . • . i .. .. . .., . • . : • - ' . . ...,:y. ••''• i • ' I . ... . . • ....:.• , ...••-•.:•••• . ' : : .... ' ' I ..-..i r.:.•:', . ...,:.:....: . i • •'. • - ... . . ' • :..,...,. . . ..., . . ...1....... .. , .. . .....: .. .. • 1 . . . . . . . . ,..775',.:ARTZW,TE.-77777:gli---:::•:...- . '. . . t . .:.. . ••.. ..., . ....-.:-..- - , . . i - • ., I 00-gtlig%;-?...a0ll'UNLDOkl,-':i7. • ••:::: ' • ; ' '': . :.•. : '1 : , ....,-. .•....:. : •••:.• .••.: : • • - ..... •- - : ' 1 -: ...., : , i ' ' . • ., .. ; •... ::.•• : • - - : : , : r..... .....,. „ „ : , f -• .--.::." • -• ••..-:.::.... ' ' I . : • • :-. .....,.....: . - • * - *:-'• : • • • ,.. ..: . : ..... ' . ii..:•",,---...,: :::N;:•zi'-.7 :::.,•,; ;T57.7•77:' .5Fro. ' ... .....,.. .,,. , . , ,.... : . :•-• ' :: . l 1 • , •:•• ;. :. • • ' ' ' -.. ',. ' 1...... •....... .' ••l"--....... : : -il:Iltill,a1.lel:Mi . :.j..- :: , ,..,.....• . .. . :. ; i • • . . I . . ' • -' ' • ' • :: -• . , . . ...,• . ' .,. ..., . : • i : ::::::•,:: -.:, fki..2,1:-IL. .:4,-...h..%:..'ili.,l,,il*:;:liti4A-li',.*Ii?M:7,-'5.7,1;_NiaLgi=ifff,77gl:7-51 : .: : ...-...• •••••.'• . i : 1 . ..:. . : . • ,-..-. - ': •.::::. - • : ; l i • • • :,..... .:-:;.:.:.•.... •:....-: .......:Ty *:. ,..: :...:.. ' .i f•rari .-- 2-AL.1: ::i • l '.. •• . ' . ; :. . ........::: . . • •-•.:.: '; •: l • : • 1 ; , ,,. ........,..... ....:., . . • ....:',:';:-. ....... : 4: '. ' •..("1• '.•.;.,•:- ; ; -. : 4• ..;.....;:. . •.,..' - . ' '• *•-• ; : ! ! ! •••*y•:: .. .. .. : . . .. -,,:::::. :-. Eiiii.74.,5glii,IVI'RW1 ! '. •' ' i . . ...: .. -.:,...•:••:: :. •-,4:?.--'•-. . -:.-4';..- •: .'.• •••::•• : • '••'••: ' . . . . . : . I ••-•:::"•:•:*• i . :,• - ........' • ••:" ' - , „,,,....,___., . P: • :4• ' ': 1 . .. . - •• • • * .: -, ,. .. . . . : . . . I • ••• •• •• . . . . .:,..:.: :. .. :: • '••%1'4•4•*?;':•77144- ; '..:'''':' . • •: ....?. •-• : . . ...... .. , I . •.... ! ' --•. . , . . . ...... . . - '.•* • : .•.::,----- !-:..•;::::-• • . .'.::::: . .::. . - : . .. : . . . !?•-•:.;'.::' .. • , - Proiect:Projeeti Task 1::3,,,, A.f.ili:itd Progress t:i.,,,1„,.a,.., ,:a...v.4.1 Summary Wag,="meni External Tasks ifeAtATIREW47 Deadline Date:Tue 6/25/02 Split Milestone • Project Summary t..71-7-0 ri--'i"-•'--:1-"'''ZV External Milestone,• • ili.D.GEN. ENGR.CONST.1140 . , CRTY OF FONTANA • WALNUT$JUIXIOPEURINI18111LAND SVII81,: filltill NS 1 - Jun 321Jul 1 I Jul I Jul 3 1Jul 4 1,1u15 !Jul 6 1Jul 7 'Jul 8_Lail? Jul 10 JulIt Jul 12 I Jul 13 Jul! 14 Jul 151Jul 16 14u1 17 Jul 18 Jul 19 I Jul 20 i Jul.2'i IJUl223 Jul 23 ID Task Name• 'Duration Sun j Mon I Tuej Weil Thuj, Fri_I Sat Sun Lyon 1 Tue Wed Thu. Fri.J'....,Sat ' Sun Mon_LTue,1 Wed Thu_ Fri rSat .Sun I Mon I Tue _. ,4... --T140BILIZAtiON 5 days q:-•;;;L:;.:".,....;*: 1,:fii,-,[gOZ,':-:;.,F*00;7.7.;",7 -3..:::••• •.;: •:•:.5';.A.I: "'.*:!: :" ....'•••:•:,;:i•-..':';••• ••:,:,••:,,P,...".". ..:'..;',.;:•'!,•;1 2 1*...I-:';::'i:-.',*••••:'i*;•.I • -- • ''''••••• •••.:,..,..........., ...•,.. ,....,...................;,....,:;.,..........,......,....,.., ..."....,...••••:::;•-•,•...,..•.:. 1:::'''.:' '''''::::''..•••'' . ;.,....„.„,..„,,,,...„...:.;,.....:...:.,...:, . ..,„,..,„,...,...:,....,,,,....... . .,......•...,•-••,-.-•••••,..... --.,... ..,....., ....: :••••-......-:•,f.........,..., ...,......-.,„:„,...:..,..:.....„... ..........„,„,....,........,,„.,, • . .,..„.. ...,. ---Th I LAYOUT POTHOLE '•3 days i:::::::,Rt.-•••••.••••:; ' tit,,T.KitIV.'4,0.4.0::'1'0,WkiROTIIII5',"; '.4 -•'-'"-"'" "' •t:•.:•••••••:-.:.,!:;.:;..;:•:::::::.....,;,..:-..., ----4----1. - 1•••,.;rs.'sil.'...f..:3• . . ; '(.'.•;;;I,,...":!:;-:i'1.'::::•••'t:'!!.-:;:-.!: ,",•••••••••.',•-• I ' ' -' " — ••••"---• ,...:....A...„.„,..„..,,;„, . ... . . ......,.„... . . ,...........„.......... ; ...,,,,,,, 5 I 1EXCAVATEPIPING-WALNUT 7 days ;:-.....-,-?:,•-•.,:::- ; ; . i --,:.--,:r„,','..„"...:*•,*.4:,•;":•,:-...,:::i1:,..;.•:::„•••• 1",•I'2A-,Z;4,;7--*-'. ",-,t4-;:',4;',..;',gt1II.14T..A§'';:::.'","*.;;I:e'."';I .•':•";•;,.::: ;;',1;17-tak•9-2•10 :....:"*.„-.;1„.I.;......k';',I'i•;.I.::,';';;.!..• : . . ......... .....,...,.. . 6 I 1-,I.*:!-.1::::".•;:;-2*-I, . ; ; . ';';':;;;*-1.,.':.g.::::•::•i-s.:;'gii.....f.:;I:-.I.i. ; ,..„,,....,,.......„.,..,.., . . . . . ...,.,. ..•....• . . . .-....„..........,.,......„ . ......,..,..,..,...,..........,... ,.....,...,,„,...., .,,7 1 BACKRLI4COMPACTION,TEMP-PAVE '7 days I-i,„•::•:.',..;-::•j,-;.....J.,'.:::,.".:: ••••,•,.....--„,....,.. Mil:fttatig ViiWIgi,f'::!,;',I.;,..f:T4".!:-'77,7•;::::"I'aitt;05'ift'Iiita1., -1;'41,;:::.1."... ....•:!,::::, ;*-.1;,;:,:ip*:....1, t.'.::::.„•-•-*•.:-.;:f-..,•tt-,-;;;:•••..".•••:::••;. t :-....:,-,.......,--,;:::::,,-.....:',-:;;",..• ---,..„..„.,.,.,....... ,....,.., .. ,....,.......,.....,.. ....,........... ,.......................,... ....,..,....,.,.. ,9 Ill EXCAVATE,PIPING-JUNIPER 16 days I:,•••:::•"1„.:--,-*N*:::;,, : • ; :ts."....:.:::::::::::::.:!::a•Ir...--g;:s.,:if";;;:-..sri . - • -••-••• ••-. r--77.7 , , ,. • • ...,,r71,7.7:7"',..71 i:.:,,,...:if,.m....7,....,:.:-....:.,......:.7.,1 :. --..:::::•::::-...,.2.:::...s.:•::: :...3.:::.;-:-.,;.:,.f.- 11 BACKFILLCOMPAOTION,TEMP-PAVE 15 days 1":."."';:":"-;;:;•,„:,.:.j. i. 12 t ;.-,-.:.-....,:,..., . . ••.•-_:,....f....•:•.•...••.. • ..... . ......... .. ...:::::::::'.',..'::::::iic: ':',.............,.'1.1:;:::.;:::::: 1:'.......:::',.';':.!‘•.:..1;:.0.;:::::::';i::?.:::::11:.: .;. [ 3 1-,-;.:.---,,,..:.:i • • ..-.....-.-.:,....,.......,...-.... . ' ."...:. :•:,:.-.:-.:!:.3.-1...?::'.f:::..,:--:: 1 13 1MFL,'s,LATERALS 4 days I''....*....`,-.:.-„".• .:"....1, .„..-........ . 14 I ;.,:'1.•ril;....•1"1I) .•::.:•••.]:: -..-:•.I'.-'•-:••, '••••••••••••••• . . . . ..,„..... •""•**—'••••"""*- I 1 15 TESTING,BASEPAVE 3 days 1...*...,_•:.:.:.::::::„.i„:,.---sI. - •- ' ••• ..;•::::•••:•..,::•.......::..:•,..:•;•:.•I .,-..,..,...,........,.. .. .......-......,...... . .... .. ,..,,..„....• : ,,...•.....:,-;,:•.....-..,,„;,,.., 16- 1 -••''• - : :„...;•.::„.,..;.............,.,.. 1 1 '-.:1;.--.••••.s.:: I 17 I EXCAVATE,PIPING-H1GHLAND,S1ERRA 11 days .."..:-.,.....:,.....y.........:,..!: •*.:*,...:::,;. ....:...:..S........:. .. .:•••;...... ..;:.1 t .. . . .. •,... -.... . ..,........... ,..... :.,.:..,..........„.........., 1 .........,-..„...„•...,„.......:,,R.;._ • i 161 BORING 4 days fr-,...............;....-. 2 , .. ....3.!...-:•-"::.:"•:::::::•:::;:.:Ii.'2...-••••:: :',.-;.=',Tli '.. - : :*:-:•••-:".•":':;'-. :"''t';:•••••1Z•ifl'-'-,.....,:: ...........„...., . ---- 5 li • •, - • " ,-.......„,...,„. 21 1M.1-1.'s,BASEPAVE,TESTING 4 days , . ......,........ ,,,,,,....-...,..,...••:.:,.•, •:•-""•':-•••'''•:•"'•••'''-• 22 I • .......,,,„„.......,,. ...::,„•••-•.",'....,:.,‘:::::::::'.:-.•"-.-6:,.:i.,•„: •••-•-•-••••••''•-- •••-,F,,..,,-.:.,.••.•,....„,:„...,.,., ;•,-:••••:.•,-.?.?;- •. . .....:,...,..., --. .....,,,....,...........„, .'.--•-23--'- CAP PAVE 2 dpys il,:.,:::•••.•:-.::-..;;;;.: --•• -- • -, ....:.,......... ; t.:-..---......•••••;,::::: i..,,,:..,-„,,,:.;,...;„;:.:::::„...., i,.....,-,....„:::,,,.....,;., • 24 I 1":5.•:'..:".'*-;-:::::::'...-,:: :.,...,,,..,...„.„,.....;....„..„„, ,.,....„......-....,...........,,j . - .-..3,.,.........„..,.. 3 • 173F.3'3.3;..•::!3:'. . •!.:;;:::':':::33'.:;,..:,.::.:::'....'3.:.';',..: 25 I MISC TAWS,GEN.CLEAN UP 2,days •••••;.".•.-.--,..tr.---..; • • ..--„.,•.„,,..• •:•.:•••••••••••,::••••••••-,-,. • • .....-...,..,.,... ...„ ::-.,*;•:••,-......;,,... . ..... ,.............., ,.....„...„,„.„, :.....,-,...;„..i...-.,,..:,...„......„.,., . . .... ............. .... .. .. .. . -....,-,-.;.,-•.--,-.-t.".......-.,.....- , : . . . . . .. •:.....,.,.......,;,-,,.. ,... .... ..... .. ... : •:::::,.........,1,,,;,...,....., : '.:*.':••::,W:,•;•:::?-•I;.:•••*•:::.......'.9•. . .... ..-,. .. .... 27 DEMOBILIZE 2 days -. •-.._. ............ . , „.,,..,„.„,:,,...,:,.::.,._;-..„2..:. • . Task iFF',;-.4.tt-, ,-;',.:-sil.-,i,'-0,1.7;*,,., Progress t.,, ,,-l-,,-.Rkt,-,PrtA Summary '4*;:t -'''* •:'-'''''''''"*20'..,,,i; External Tasks 1,4.t*"eq,4.27.17;N.;IR;_,W Deacillne Project;Projeotl Date:Tue 6/25/02 Split Milestone • Project Summary .•$-4-"g:-='7,i, '"-"-: .----',=A-'-*-0,:,1T,--• External Milestone . .....,,-;;;;;,,;it i!„-•-,,,•••,• Page 1 2 f i w 't i i CITY OF FONITANA WALIMUT4UNOPERINIGHLAIMO SEWER - AINS 3 Jut 24 Jul 25 JulS i Jul 27)Jut 28.Jul 29 Jut 3U I Jut 31 Aug 1A_I Aug 2 Aug Au a !Aug Aug {Aug 7 l Aug 8 I Aug 9 Arlie'.Au 11 LAug„12;Aug 13�Aug,1.-Aug 15 Auk 1> Aug 17 Aug 16 • ID `•.Task tame �,...._... � . �!.� � � � �,.,...g _v,_ Wed Thu t Fri _Sat 1 Sun Mon , Tile T Wed Tttu 1 Fri Sat_ Sun Mon Tue I Wed i Thu i Fri Sat Sun i Mon Tue:- Wed ? Thu Fri Sat ' Sun 1 M081UZAT10N Z,. .. _ n; I - t 2 I 3 LAYOUT POTHOLE i 4 { I 5 EXCAVATE t?iP{i<3G 4VAt i�1t T ':_ I ctSi 7 BACKFILCvMPAC [tN EMP-PAVE 8 { . ; Y. t wr-. EXCAVATE PiPti�t�-,1t1 E ::':'.;, ; ::'.:::.° 10 11 $ACKF LL C PACT • i OM ,i©N,TEMP-PAVE §:,:_ _. � ..:w.•�w=.=v=nr..... a .s. � ,.,..::. r�SJ,...:. ..�. :., ":L. 5. '- 7 - 12 - 3 M,H.s,t.A:TERAt.S =G s ;r :. - : 14 `F 15 AS TESTt G B EPAVE N 16 i 7 EXCAVATE PtPltvG-l-tt N� t.A I NDSE RRA 18 .t4, 'r . • • 19 BORING f _2D „ F 21 P .H,s 3ASEPAV"TESTfNG aP F -i 2 i -t /V A e 23 CAP PAVE k 4 I 4 24 iSm'tr' 0 j 2 ti�i� A' l s s�T i{� G ' .S S EN CtsEAN UP =nb', NO 8 ..p ry•i 1' :q L_ :i ' d • !�n 27 DEMOBILIZE --�r ,x� <r" 4 i_% Task Pr rese - .4t0. �r;;;. .� -� s� I Project:Projeetlog Summary iat Fusk � il N Deadime Date:Tue 6l25102 i Split Milestone • Project Summary `=41-4z5 S ExternalMilestone �'` NOTFD Paget �/(.... .... y FT II ll ...f1; . 13 G tee.• _. -- .— - �1 ......... . t , CITY OF FONTANA I YVALNUT,JUNIPER,NIGHLAND• I I SEVIER IVIAINS k i . . lAug i 91 Aug 20.Aug 21I.Aug 22 Aug 231Aug 241Aug 25 Aug 261 Aug 2709att Atig_291..,,,kug,N Aug 31I Sep 1 Sep 2 I Sep 3 Sep 41pep 5-1Seri6 -Sep 7 Sep 8 '1 Sep 9 1 Sep 10 s9R1li Sep 12Lep 13 t1 10 Task Name - L Mon Tue 1 Wed i Thu tri L„:„ 0:i, s'41:1 1 Mon Tue 1 Wed L Thu I Ed I Sat J•.:.B,111M,on 1_1:y9, _Wed,..j. Thu 1 Fri 1 Sat Sun Mon I Tue 1 'Ned 1 Thu 1 Fri I 11 T---fv-Tijiii.TiA-tION ' — - - ' - '. i, '' ...:....:.:'...:,:-,.:.::?.:-.'.:7.ii*::::1.:•.-:..,•,..:::......:. i • . :i*:::!:::•-::::':::::..;:•..3..::')-.:::.:;::•:::::::i.. ; . ,,:..,„:„...„:„.....„...:,......„ : _........... ..... ...... ;::,;-..,.....:•!..::::.,-....:..........,::?..,.!.....: ; 2 •-•:::-...:,•:;,.••::.."•:•.., : . i ;-1,1•11::11..:..:1"1.:1„11.:..11111:;:1•1::: -.,•.--: •':- ..,• - ,.„............„......;........., . 3 tAr. LYT,POTHOLE I - ....•,.::.....-:-..,;•,...,...:,....::'.... .. .,.sr..,,,,...,...,,,,......,.. v.+....,.I..:........ . .....- ...r...,............. . ,-......... ........,..r.......,,....,,,. . ..1.......-...:.- ...-. ..• r. j......,—...,,,,,,,:..;..;...:.....,........, : : r.....,:. .,y,,...,::........,.. 4 tl 5 EXCAVATERIPING-WALNUT , . . : .,,,,........,.,.......,......... .....„............:,, .....: .. _. ...... ,:. f ...,-;-..........:.f.::::;. ..,:::, . . • 1:1-'•'1111:1--s...1,1.:-..:11:1,-z1:•- ,, ..,::-...,,...:,-...,••••...:- 6 " , ,:-•:,•,--::...,... ......•••-e,:•.•.....,.:::•:;..............,.1.;•„..: .: .-...!,,,E,-..-...-!:.:-.:.:.:0::::,,:•- . .,..,..„..,..:,„,....,: t , ,E::...--..,.:.:.:.:....„:-..-..... ...,•:-., ........ ,..........,. , . 7 BADKEILL,COMPACTION,TEMP-PAVE : :, --...:,-,-..--.:•.,;ff;.-.......---.•-:•:,::, . : •-!:i..11.:.15::.11..:.11-r.:.-•,11:1-:•:-....:::::::1.'..1.1..151 ;.1.:-.1:1:-...?...1„:1'..1 ::,•11.1.1111'.....;... . •: : 1 .1:-.1.-...11:1.1...:1;-1 :1:1f.::11.1.11,1,'• • ; :„..,:::: :;..-..::•::.:.,.::„..,....,:;.?„.•:-.•:, f .. 8 . ......,-:::......-.... . .. ...... . -.....: ..,..... .........., .t . .. .... ... . . ....:.:.-...-...............:.....: . .::,;:.....:......5-.!..: ,.:...-:•:.::,....,:..:::-..7.:,,i. ... 9 EXOAVATE,PIPING-JUNIPER ......,.........,...::„......,.....,....i...........• . .. ..... ....... .._...... . -.:........:-... . ....... . i 10 ... ,..... ...... .. . • ...-•-- ......,,......,.• . .1 ..•. '' . -- •:::::.:::::.,..-2,...:::„::-!:••.,::,....:::....:::. . . • ::',-...,•:5::::::: -......,.."1:••;."..../,-..•„:•,...: : - , ..,.......,:',-..;,,-::: ,.,...:.....;,:...,,•:,-.•:. : . ..... , .. , . ...... ,........ : . . . . .. . ,. .. . - -...-.....-..,....-.„.,....:•:. • 11 BACKFILL,COMPAOTION,TE MP-PAVE ..... .....,...,, . . .... , .. . ., .... ..,.....„ , . •,..,.....:.:,:i.:::.....:•,„.:. . :•,..........„„.....„,...,..,..„,....‘:„.. . 12: 1 M.H.'s,LATERALS ...•............-............•„:::',,.....-...,.:..,.......,- ...,2...::..:-;..::..,..:.•..;::.....-.:....-.'.::-,:,:::,:.•.:.:.f...........-..........:...• ., „....:.-..,......:.....:.......:..:..-....„.,.,..,..:•,.-..„.,:.:„........,..........:...:.....,.,.: ... .., '. .:,:•. . ... ...„,..:.. .. - . . ... .-... . . .. ..„., ...,. . .......,.... ...:.....-. -, 14 . • .. .......,..,...,:.:.::,-.„,.... ...,••:;:.,,E,•:;• • '...:.- -''' ' ' '.--.------:--2.:--": ...-•',I s• I I .:....,.,.,......,..:,.„ , . .....,.......,.,,.,.:„..::.......:.„. I 15 TESTING,BASEPAVE f ,..... 1..:..,..,--.....:......... 1 I . .,..„:„..:...„..:::..,.....„ : . 15V V ...:,..:- , • -. .... . 1 ... • - 1 -,,. .. :... ' 1-:::.:-.-1•1:--1,•••••-••--.:- - ., —_-_,...--„,-;._-______ 1•2,14-41::„1...- ,,,,.-„,1- . ..: ... ...... : . : 17 EXDAVATE,PIPING-HIGHLAND,SIERIRA ig.iif:Igtp;',..gjlegfkirtgaiW.,?,;?!...,;...,,,,,.:-,,Kk.•,,f.p•inei:e.d'Teisi5.-3M•...i•g:OFP.:;•'?..1::1:;'::1:Siill.feggf.gii•MWRii-W0-.5-igtOig•fP:„'4: 2!";RIM : ' 1 18 • : ::„.„....:::„..-,..:.,....-...., ....,.... . : : ::::::•••„,...,:.:.;...ri.,,.. • " :. '._•„--.1-1.:.:•,..,...-..• . . , -:•••... .... .... .,. • - - ,- ----- • • 19 BORING 1111'(tTAILAS:Aii -0B g,g,'2M202 2: 1 . . .....„.._.. . . . 4,..„.::......„„.,„......,....,:,:., . . . . , . ..,. ,... - 1 20 . . .......... .... .. . ... ........ „..,.. . ... ,., : : ,.....,,.....-....:-.:..L.:.....:...-.; :..,:„,..„..:,_. : i 21 M.H.'s,BASEPAVE,TESTING . :::.•::::11'...::::;: •..,.:1-•:;:j.;.:;:1.,; 1. 1.•::::-:•j.:•;•-'-----;:::.;1•1;•:,-1';':,:: I22 . ,..........:..,....:...,...... ::,..,...:,..,„...,..,..„..,„:,„ i.:.:„-.....-::::..::-..q.,-.-„,-...:::,....,.... . . . ••— .--- '- I 23 CAP'pAVE • • :....,..,......,...,..„:,....,..,. .. ,.. . 1,1;f1111g111i11181,1Wa'4,:- ......i,-.,.,; :i. ,-:-,...-., 1 . .. . ..... ......„ : ........... . .. . 2.4 ._. ........ ......... ,., „. ..,.......... ..... ,::.. ....,.•:,.........,,,•...: . : 25 romp TASK'S„GEN.CLEAN UP -.....,...........:::',......,....„.....:- -.:-:.......:.....•:."•,...:.....• 1.',1.,-2•2',:1,':;1..,1.-.1.:•1111:.::;•11.:-- ,...:.:,:r.;:::,..-:.•...3.•:,•:::„ ...,:1",•• . 1...*::.1.:::•i-i-1-.-;,...:':;!:11::,. :11„.:11.•-; . ..,. ...,.., . .. . 1 26 V VV .. .............. . ..... . ... ...........: ... . ...,... ' -- -----•-..‘ "27 DEMOBILIZE • _.,.. .. ......... , ... .......,.-.„.........,,... .... .„. -. ........ • 1..:1-„-..",1;.:•.11: ::1'1...f....11-. 1 1 • . • : t.. ;•=',1,...,-..?.Z-",.717.'t 1,.....! -....;.. ••:::,: • _ ............_••,........, Task E.,,-,,,,,,,,,,,-.40?..,,5i.,(,,,,,,,,N..1 Progres& -;,=. Summaly T'',Ii7,-;;-'4''''''''''-14';'-'4"29.P. External Tasks iiicilitX1',3:414,10$0.1 Deadline •.,,.1.2.7 Project:Project! Date;Tue 6/25/02. Split Milestone •ret, Project Summary T;P--,g--mr--1,-t---- v External Milestone 0,' 1 ,,,,,,•„,,,,,,,,„,„„,,,,,,,,,,,,,- . . . .. ,.. ., . .: Page 3 . - •• . " — . • , . i • 00/Lb/LtiUL T JjL! (4O14 mIJJIUIY l -HY f'HUG UL mission clayMtSS10N A DIVISION OF MCP INDUSTRIES,INC. 23835 TEMESCAL CANYON ROAD•P.O.BOX 549•CORONA,CA 92878 . (909)277.4800•FAX(909)273-2708 June 26, 2002 A.D. General Engineering Construction • 2829 N. Glenoaks,-Suite 106-101 Burbank, CA 91504 Project: South Highland and Juniper Sewer Systems City of Fontana • Gentlemen: Mission Clay Products and Building Products are both divisions of MCP Industries, Inc. The vitrified clay pipe manufactured by either company conforms to the following specifications: ASTM C 700, Standard Specification-for Vitrified Clay Pipe. Extra Strength, Standard Strength and Perforated. ASTM C 425, Standard Specification for Compression Joints-for Vitrified Clay Pipe And Fittings. ASTM C 301, Standard Methods of Testing Vitrified Clay Pipe Standard Specification for Public Works Construction. SHOP DRAWN(.,. �'' ViEVV AASHTO Designation M-65. i SUBMITTAL I The pipe will conform to"Extra Strength" requirements. ! JOB a: 2_1_b(A J®D NAME: a,.'J a 9 '-& eit -1 Sincerely yours, • ; f MISSION CLAY PRODUCTS SECTION• (-1 `uL ] NO EXCEPTIONS TAKEN 4 ; Edward J. Loftus AMEND AND RESUBMIT Vice President • and Director of Engineering , RETURNED WITH EXCEPTIONS NOTED CALIFORNIA LOCATIONS: OAKLAND — CORONA —. '..ANTA FE SPRINGS PHOENIX, ARIZONA — PITTSBURG, KANSAS — SA 4ypENE1`to I;,.f,`Ej' mo44, DATE E R IEAE D. DATE' ':..., d~I!RNA =:z:D: do/LO/LOUL C17.Cl7 TiU7L I r 4014. Ir Il J.71UIV ULH; rHUL• UJ • • • • • mission clag p A DIVISION DI•MU'INLUSTRIFS; INC • • • • it r (. �: Y lib. JOINTED Qp•'�I.��., .,.r.•,•. N.(i:ali�r"1" ''.r�4l!• • �• •/ :. try 4 Yi`;'3. • REI y ei•y(`�r(le ' r rr i,:;;5 • Y•V'�p, 'I; `1�Yi?,; , • • + y •• +. �R.r. "i1•11 . 4i ��Fq•. sil.n�?i" vrr i IE ., . D CL,AY PIPE tITTiI((S ,;;E• • • a • • • • • • • • • • • • C 1111 • : • MISSION • • • P i i! � �, �1 r/ 'lj r�t '' p_ ' r�i �iF� ,A{'fYk �. + 1=�� 9T Fdy ]W, j ! j� � .�},� t S sty �' �ff i7 `Y+,,pp .. �' rLt 3q`�� yar�f} - t ;rSp „tdv• • t � 4 Y1 )� F ;�,h 3 rah " • IitiIri' Over 50 years of clay pipe manufacturing experience has positioned Mission Clay Products as one of the premier suppliers of vitrified clay pipe and fittings; superior products having an in use life expectancy of more than 100 years. In fact, day pipe Iine, installed in the U.S. in 1815 are still in use today! And today vitrified clay pipe possesses even more effective water-tight joints and strength compared to day pipe of the past. When you see "Mission" on the product, you can count on unsurpassed industry know how For installations requiring long lasting product dependability, specify Mission11111111111111/ JCP IS AVAILABLE IN 4" TO 42" WITH POLYURETHANE COMPRESSION JOINT • WYE TEE • CLAY INCREASER. REDUCER • • MITERED 1/16 • MITERED 1/8 or 22 1/2 BEND or 4S" BEND • MITERED I. a or 90 BEND .{.lp''f J llvl ,'N1;i r.,r r il. ?l Y i.'•Ntn l�r r• .'gi i'7+ �;.'. rj'>r '.r i; r:1 ** �1.* '}•4 ij,,, '+r 1 r r 1 _1 F "Srryi.,',. r "+bY 1'i k�,!I �,,, !• 1XA,.J,iC'rrY�� .,- , y t Iris ?'i , ° py{"I„r Irtr P1 kF 1 , .4'. t�>•�f7 //••,� tkY{y lf...tali �r"'F�k'"' ({, l�.4•4,WF'.r� 7 • .ti I",t f t `S S'�Qrl'F� I,• , „ F ) I h'�lE Yl Ir ( • ,.3' ' 'Y 3 K'f', � ��F +l• /. n' 1 ... ! !� • ! 4.•,r 1 1 i o4,, 1( '� • `1N' } �q l ,,i n ( t H •y . .o r.,+, v .lAr,,y. r, .., ,•.. tF, C rd r,.. it. ,6:J: Y>•1,•� , h i40.II`• , i 2,;03..,i ..�'n 11s;:l ICli,:!t,:r :):•1 ., 1. .d. , • The physical properties of JCP Vitrified Clay Pipe and Fitt:Ings C.I1c'r'n (oily inef l oral uri df*'( k'd by df.c.ornposition and abra:,ion cornna.;rl to other pip,., r.i,(tr•rt.1l, 1lit)I'lly resislanl to attack Tinto .st_lNt=r ga'ie:`i, act(:li, alkali', and most olhei ic)rros,ivf land,tl.L tl,a, (ornrrluniy plague roost domestic anti in(lusl.riral sanit.9ry sevver sydnn'i • VViII not, deforn, uncicr curRstant load con(iition; • is ___ ..,0.:' 441111111 , • CLAY WYE &rTEE SADDLES • POLYURETHANE•WYE Ea TEE SADDLE KITS Aviikil>I, 4"ht I, Av,irI,))I(:•: 4" • ()"dvitilrlt)k'in lcc 1,)(A1i'Kil wily fl.>uxy,ii lulls i1 will)lot only ( .. • a « • • • WYE with • TEE with Band-Seal' Band Seal` Lateral Lateral !' •... LARGE DIAMETER ADJUSTABLE REPAIR COUPLINGS (AI?( FOR MAINLINE SEWERS �a�,��A Av.i i,iI'I•in I'•' •11' ,h.ullrlrr. / t I111)riil!.I',•1," I(I..WI.I,',,,,,I I.I'I,•' ,„,,I.I.,,,, ,II,1lli111,.I,>•,t' ,II: ,1.,11,1• .,.., 1.'1, ��•!,_ 1„I)llrvi,!i•tr.l n•1.•, ..,'.II,.II Ilil.,•,r,J.. ' I I.1,41,'ll Uu':Ipn,l,,I1•„111111t.,l,ll•',IIII ii'I„I'.III lnln'O1 I'• ,III WI, rl,u1,),•(1l•l„I,111(1,,rlll,w'Inl','.I'.V),,,"1,,),11I1( 1111(. Illt ,,I111,II11.1 .I(1„11.1 II I•,,,II,luw • (.wltlnu)..,u,•I II.wllr•.,u,.In.❑,1,1,,,!Mr,', i I I'I Ito ltd.!), 111.4.111,1 In 1,',Ill,•1,1 It .11111 MI.111i 11011 l)y Hom,tll,I)il lun,lll,l,u,,l,lll '.W('I ,),r,'., ' WO tl,.n';,I.nlllr^,, ,1r,4•,1rIsiti,. ..I„'.,, Hipp,rAl(1 1 1.141 t I.urllr.li.lv,'.I SN, ,•'II.',•.I„1(11.•.,•,I•'1 I ,I101;, „1.1 I,.- 1.., ,:...I I•,Ir n)llll I„I)Ilrinl...•v,I1 I)1r.,1('I .,...1..,l lnal„iui,ini, IMPORTANT: VVI1,1,,Pill, ..), •,),;,hiv ;Ii' •'ii,nl• III,,, i..I1,. •ii Illy n,.'.1 lnl,l.•.Is,II1'11,1l0'.1 - ��.� r.(. ril a .:/ .ie 5�: ;•a :e.� 4 �t,T h+r,.�,T•,,....E,... Stw a n r>• J, t' 1' t r .1 r ( 1, ,h•;, w ,f Ir �qi ,)( :t a. i/ is .114 j�,1. 'IT t 'ta. 1 n '�.' 1.q t rt a, �` r t a a [•g.., �Y. ��;y • E t'ft `it"E{2' tit . • i'Xl' G�.�'trry6:7;j•rf'S- i A 1. b i�',,qq(( �5 tt to +1 S i f'� 7t U � �', > , i r i e t L �' `A' n'''s`I �,`., �� ,,1:tj'-,. i y 1^. Ia f 3?;.. , 1„0 .r t. 11'lA ��� t r !t elf , •p 11 • {t�tlf '4` 1S�n Et p}�•a;i Vll �t4i.y�a� t1lapi, , �#i �ev ��Y • "` �\9l:M15�A!;1i. . I Y,!rist . ;% 1 Jwi7' .,./4...," .f ...w.... . 1 , �... ':•';< .•I...‘r • , '' f21'.14.,.!:, '�,,, ,. . .. . _ } . ^_. .. j(P Vitrified Clay Pipe is quickly installed with a minimum of additional tools. • St allc( cr>l.rirlirlcp ,154r'nil>Ie r'<t'/ily wiIh.ttnly ,'1 Iirrn !phi, or ~have I)y h,uui. L,frcv-sr )t'As may r(r(.It.rirr a pry bar Or pip(-, pullet. • l() (WWl<Int f)rr)1)('r .erlOJn ,Iflf.(', boll fu>lt.., It I'( be •prcw/ici(a,) IOI (NI( II u'c him. • I:rllir(.• I('n(Ith of pipe t);3Ir(i'I must he sun/Oiled by ifllvir:ldirlq i.:,ttcf10(). II IS hi(?Itly r'rt.t)mm('n(l(':I !hill 1:)['rfci, c1 n,.fl('rr.rl hr ',h•fw('I •,Ilc t'(i ink) (1'1(( II;Iurlc Ii {,I ow I>(I'' • • Ri'I('r to /\STM ()e,,tt,ln,tt''/o C. 12, `')I<rf(I,rrtf Pi,tr I,it (' (cn Ift'rl;l(Inttl \/ilriljet.) (. Id Pilo ( int-, • To Install Polyurethane / / Compression Joint:: . f I l I ' I .I . V�rll,(' !creel (loom• ,. r ()II 1)01h 'i igul tild rFr• t ,q 1+.. 1k ;le` i ''•'i ra .'I( Lot. 'oI"i.1! 'I. ,t I \'' '^ •. . f if J� t p, J B p ' ,OP 0 '`. , >/ r ,;11t7�A y , .i'.' 1. I 1' • ! . t ,Y(••(•;'\ •rd a ,i"..„re:;• , r 'lt x-.•r• f l??1efi ra „J t \ 0 •. :, 1 rr ;r. 4,t < t, irr . • ,;(Jj!IViI'<I ;Of r It.tf l! I 1-IUL_ U t UU/ d_U/ ./...UU4- U..).U..) 1 -1U.?1.1 (.-40.L 9 ly1.1.-)-DJ.U1 I .,..,LH I ..W,i,',.,:j;.:i‘,11?;JIK..,..K,11"/,:':,ii.,/1,NYV.4.‘../;:iPI,,..':::;;.'1,4;..‘..-,fr.ii,S3 lie!Ati.Iiiit:' Vi';',Idit' ...l'..i,'4''.'„ ••,p..-' •,.4•• •.. ti.:!...14-A)..0.,.:,:.,,,,..;,,,.......`.,',....,;.-......'..%;:,•)-,`,.,:... .. ",:....,...........', '. :. • V1..1. 7.';'0V4C.V4';:i.'1.).):4-•..11,1.'./.?,1!1::',.;i',?,A /1.'4 '1,..a7411.K. '., 4`.“ ./le LA1 'i.. ''. ' •' ' 14.r-11!-,a''''('''''';': ;'?!‘..;;''..• i's''''''''•;,,f.'1-1:-'• '' ':'.'... '''''' '''' I ' .''• .,,‘,...1,414,',.,;,,:t.i?./,:.klirkYtii::':3)..,..1Z.:VP.'ild:1 R'it" .,,9entkifAP,"i‘ :(14.,,A,rtiw,,, ';',,, ,;...,,,•,!....!...,,,,A!,"?.,..,:4)4,...:::,?.1,..:M4.14,,,..:4;i4iii:......:**...,,'., .,.411. i.,t•i•,i. vrl:p.>ie •...#(....,4•i.‘ ... ! , ......,, -4 :.. 1: - ' . •'•.; . , • : .! •.., * t‘,.,,.is.4.f,.4 . : — • • . .. x• ....... ,',, . • ,.. )40,.'....,.i.5.47,••'...,:".7'77',W1, fC,,,, ,..W.i; ...... ,f,',:' rx?! . ' .4:/'/Ojr';.',1r,.* , N'f.4t fitrA, L'' .,.1,•"1) .r i,*f:1,...e.T.N.f. ,,,:1,...-•.:r.T 1,*?,1.'s.,,.1,,. •.?-• ''''...,..!-,4 ...,......• . . . , :.,.e., .i,' •.:. "';.• ,',.. s'.'....;A.:"...,..it.,,r, .''';'•ii.';';'''';•kikr;:..Vi'l,S.,'-':".i'.'.'"•,..r,t,Mt;,".:1'z'...4,, . •1.•....,,f.'14!..0,-V7. •••••,,Ii...,1.•;-.1......-..,,t./.t,,,;;',..,Y..,.......-i.. ....0...“,....•..s'r,..•.;•',.-tc-,. ' '- .',' .. . • • •• ' . ••••,,.......4,A1'....,,,..,•‘. ...-...'',.":"1•',,,...t..t..j......,:.i:•.:).:..........P.: ..S'l.. {,,,..t,...Pyi f.9,1',',10,-.iP.,,:,•,;,11 .0.1y...,....“......,:.;fe. . Z.;P,...•"'.L.,!LV't‘.t......t1;.i:,:.........I•• ...^ '• • .•••••,, . I "';\— . ... • •.. .. . • • ...... ,.0.. '.;,. .. •-•,,4,` ....' "''">ti ....1f.t • 4:. .40',41.42T1 k , _.. :.,... ,•.:,.,.•.,•. ...... ... . ... . . . .. . ... .. . .. ....• . .... . .. . , .'•''1..1' . •i.,.. ' ' - ..., ..v,!..•.•..,..,..,.,...)....,..,!,4,:••,;: . . . . . . . . .. . . .,...,..•4!•',.;6 s,q!,: •,,,......,,,..„;,• it 4,' . 1. 'V.,1 V . ‘,..;,:',..;•-:,.".::,...;:.4:.',...,.;,;)..,,.,:.;,......s.',,,;',.•••,-,.,•'•;.,'. •• ,",''. ,,,:,.;,,•.!."',...',. '4....,. ,..".•:,....P,.:,,.„.t:',..,.!:.....::: ..:;.....:''''',it....:, .'.''',',.......-;';'...,...'is?''..?...';.''..'..i":,::".......::,.'........,:•::'•'..• ....' lift.', ':'.‘... 1;.•,'.1%.,:,...':1:,*:fi..'4,i(174',::Aft.).'s*,4'.',,:ljil'g t,,,k• •:•,',:.,•:!;',.-..::.....,:.:7: ..-,.. •:••••• ,••:. •.:'.. : . .•4,,....:\....-..', ,.•!.'.:-!.,';'„. t'.•::•.',••'•••••`,••T'i,......e,•:;,,,?•••.';';',.•;,-.7.'„ ...... ,. .. ., . . • • / ' • ' • • • / \ 1 ) \ , s — / • \ ..._._ ,, „ \ • / •„. . . \ ., . . \ . . . . .. .. . ,.. .. , ... . . _ , . .. .. .. ' - ' " \ ..., . . ,.......,. . . ... , ' \ .:',1...,.°1•!'''..;2.•',.....,'.'...'•'..Z.-•:" (( ......, . '..,•,./::••:, "..);*7.,`,'').•••••••••• .'''is.- :•• , . ,. 44ii* ), ,....1...'".''' ,..0:',.:r:.: ;'" •-• ' • .. . . . " .. .. .. . ., . . / ., N.. .,..'-' ...• ( '•"--,—....._.......------ Jointed.Clay Pipe-Detail , . Ihi'• jui he n( in t bell enci i.$ NA/lifsf) tile 1.)1j)c. is ininik.(1. pn,(ision-i»ado and has in tlio oniltit,ir .1 tloAgnos „inniil,ir con)pression t)e,x1 rile joint On ille spii,Jot en( (()nl )iessoli kir)111')rody ,JP1(1 I'lli 43\siiws 0 (111')<It)10 \Cal I\ pre(isiOn•rn,)(1c, IC) (XI( 1 11(11111y 1)(11Wt,k1i1 1110 hell 111,1t 71.,rnairis 1191)1 iNcsil il ifirriell\i(M) 101 (11iii Is ,Al'ILI . 011(1 %pi()(:ll 'Mt la( 111(' fine (iCill.:(I . 1..r.ISy illS1(111.:1111111, ••;•'..,.iftillapt: .., .,..N1001Min,... ,;14/ 0jsti........i..,... • ,'[.• •••,. .• .i. -1. la '-MU:to/Wit• O..; .,IA gq.,,,T6 p•4,4.pi o.+145,..,94,. ,,,,,,,,,rt ' . ' - -' . "W. - .I171" . . 1' 1 ' "11 . . • ' '2 '''''''' • '' '''-'• II0 itij.. ''''''' ' 0411litir ff .. '''f PP) ''''' ‘...';."::;••••••••:•,•:•;"•';*:•2•••.P4,"*j..•.;4:4::'•:•,.'•4, . ':•••-1 . •••..!,.-0,'••••,,1• '1.-•••'',4N1'••I'''i•••.•,''.!'•••••.'',. .:••••' ,:!•',•,.;•.. ...,•,!.. 1,..'..'.t,'.'..,::':',..\Y-•,•••••••i•-"i,•;'-•-:,!'•••;,'4•:•.-; 1 9 . 10 '11(11) :?001) I i:ii/i 1,ii( • .$ 1 ' I•1 (1 ;/0 '" ..)11110 • ,;9101) I 11)..1p1 • 1'.1iiii 1 • ;10 11;110 1'110 • i'.1 I 1!I1 It) i ;II fi .15 2.100 ;‘1(111 11; 111111 1 1;.1 f,)11 1:' 1; 99 .11J110 ;11;1111 18 li:, 1 l';' 1,1 1; 11, i 99 200) . :1111(1 in / i!;•1 i•II) :1'.11)11 / ADD 1)1111/11.3 :1111 :'i ? 01 ;011,(1 • /1:9)(I .11 :1;1111 ..1.; I ..,.1 / 291) 411111 'IMO .i'i ;' I.)/111 :h.1 ( ... :',' / . .31.,) 'IMO '.111111) :19 11116 'I 'tt) / ;IA:1 011110 101011 •11, Ii.1 'i 1,11(1 'Al • Ill .i(11-1 51),11) ' 01f)1) 10 if/I 1 Itil :fI'.., •.... 10 1:?1'; 001)11 (1.11.19 ,111 1/,' 1 li:1 .11 ', . 9 II) 1';;;;I . ili(11) /WA) ii.) •I 1/..1 L._ ...._............._.. 1),,,-,.,...... ,ii,i,..:11,,,,,,,,iii,v:-,,,,I,,,,,,•5..1,1,,,,,i,,,4,..H1/11; ,nII • • . . fitiri3Oveii. • 1F•vw.it-tp,,i! l'••••• • .;• • • • • • ' / •"'•-" ' ,; • •*T.• k •"' .4.;1 IT* ,;!";'9f :P • ; ' • ';.",. ,•1;.' ,.*•5;; 7g.:;Y';',5270•!:;••,r; • • .;• ;, • -' t"PlAiftWOfette.lf'•IMV0,•:.4•PrnbIti 41610!, , •!:n _ . 'IOW TO SPECIFY JCP All pii)(• i:fxtra qrEini111.1, vitrified c:kly, llirIc> reiliiirerm,o1., ()I i•\.1.)1 ')pc.1 .1 i nirrd by MCP IncitOric.s. opplietl (Liras 01 .A5TVI C. 425 ' 1.,•uld,ircl So-Till'',;Ilion kir Joint', lot VI(Pic(1 (.1.-iy ri!..0 .1. I I.:1111:1o" if • pc,..r AS I M (. 12 "1/1.5idllinci Vitiilk•it Cloy l'ipc • JCP Vitrified Clay Pipe and ItandsSeal'' Couplings meet or exceed the followirig standards: ASTM C 700 and ASIM C 4 2.5 whir.h stip.orce(1e 1-ederal specifications SS P-3(0 e and SS P. i591) * 5SPWC Standard Snecifirafions for Works (Tonst,.Licl loll, Iso known infornatic.)nal Association 01 Pfunthiny and Mechanical (.)(ficiak WARNINC CALIFORNIA PROPOSITION 6S Vilitlwif Clay Pipi! MUM l; TOO F,SPVvil woo,' iqiirldinti ./f)iill AS I'M(:12!) SSPWG St:111011;.'08 '1::4Ii* ,iIi ,1i(,Ilioiij,,1.1.111W‘,1111,1'•1,0./111,•1 11.41111.1N 11,11, Li (;10y 1P.,.1111t)MCIII1111 Al.il M(.:30\ :)1) •it nom,."I. 01,latt), ol ..1110, Ilt1;1.1110111)11 Mi;11,11,1 AVM • • .,•••• • (Ravoirminirt MIDDIUM) A 1)0,0)1MISSION V CLAY PRODUCTS 1,ii 1\4( 111) )‘,.11h•.1:1,1‘, o..•. .• produ vis sill • REGIONAL SALES OrricES Soul hern Northern s.Run S49 . FiX(1 Fi Ii Awl tut, •t ( A 0,'H/8 (A 9.1(1,'I 1,1 (v09) 1// ,.1!)0() 101. (110) ',6g OS(m) .1.. Liv (IO()) 1/ ?/014 ix 010) 1111.1,1 MEMBER WILL CALL YARDS NCPI Cocoas,.(:A 04041,Intl: CA Sointo F4! SOrill91, CA 11.111‘,1.11( moon'1(t1,1.1 880 81,1 I ;1••11 I tilthilttle si Vs I • iii 0,1)./) /.1600 11,1 IM 'Mott ,../ .'") I lox (911'/) // )708 /"X lin '(;8 ,)69,/ lox On)) I/{1 PI • • UV/ LU/ LUUL U.).U.) 1 JU JL 1 1- .- 111 JJ1 U11 �...Lh-I I I HUL UJ mission clagroducts P A DIVISION OF MCP INDDS I HIES, INC A D EAL® VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE .& FITTINGS • • • ' C MISSION wk r' t The superior properties of clay pipe as applied to water control and waste water control dates back over 2000 years. In fact, clay pipe lines Installed In the U.S. In 1815 remain In service today. Mission enhances this centuries-tested application by teaming up Its superior vitrified clay pipe with the rugged and dependable Band-Seal* coupling. When you see "Mission" on the product, you can .' count on over 50 years of unsurpassed krip • , Industry know-how. Specify Mission. w e. • WYE TEE r COMBINATION '•' Available in 4'only • • 1/8 BEND 45° • • 1/16 BEND / 22-1/2° 1 • • • `' . MITERED 1/4, 1/8, 1/16 BEND 90 45 Z2-1/2° • SWEEP 1/8 BEND Available 10"& 12" ..` _•, 45° Available 4 6 8„ q • SWEEP 1/4 BEND . . 90° Available:4", 6"& 8" • • CLAY INCREASER/ REDUCER 1 ' a : it tf • i � a • • • " n • • TEE • 8" X4" WYE 8 X8 WYE TYPE • TYPE 2 Available: 2 Available: 6",8", 10", & 12" 6", 8", 10", & 12" • 1 x • ♦s y r.. n., • 0• �., • WYE i,.. • 8" X 4" : • HANDHOLE DOUBLE WYE TRAPS TYPE 2 Available: Available:4" & 6" 6",8", 10"& 12" • • • CLAY WYE &TEE SADDLES • POLYURETHANE WYE &TEE • BAND-SEAL°STOPPERS Available: 4"and 6" SADDLE KITS Available: 4" TYPE 2 Available:6" ft"available in Tee Saddle only Epoxy included with kit only Band-Seal° Reducing Couplings and Bushings provide a fast-and simple method for connecting clay, asbestos cement, cast Iron, concrete, steel pipe and plastic pipe. r: 1MY]Y 4 7 a/� �y Rr c y I 7 a ..; '' ••, A I N f S S � v S t �ifh II ✓ • w The sturdy and dependable Band-Seal' line of mechanical compression couplings and1 bushings have been in use for over fifty years. They continue to be the choice to Join clay pipe and to Join day pipe to other types of pipe. t ; I + ear ^ j 1- 11 t3 t r I`,'' TYPE I BAND-SEAL' BUILDING AND HOUSE SEWER PIPE 's • Available in 4" and 6" diameters in standard 6' lengths; also available in 4', 4-1/2', and 5' lengths ',....,. f0,. .a • Highly adaptable to cut and fit requirements • • Heavy duty synthetic rubber couplings are factory-applied to pipe and fittings with a pneumatic wrench • Field joints are quickly made by tightening the stainless steel clamp with take-up bolt • 316 Series stainless steel clamp l i' - - • it t - ,. .-- _ va.„_,=— —__' _----_---=4111111111111111.1111111111. TYPE 2 BAND-SEAL° MAINLINE SEWER PIPE • Available 'in 6", 8", 1'.0" and 12" diameters • • Ideal for permanent installations • Dependable, mechanical compression sealing joint • Factory-applied, flexible rubber couplings with heavy-duty, shear rings provide superior shear strength • • 316 Series stainless,steel take-up clamps • Meets or exceeds ASTM Specification C 425 • • 4" x 6" and 6" x 8" Increaser/Reducer Couplings • Couplinos to fit other tvoes of matprialc -. ter- _ .���.��-=r= z_�.. itik ideally suited for the repair; alteration and rehabilitation of gravity sewer pipe made of the following materials; clay, concrete, cast iron, plastic, ductile iron, asbestos _er er.t. worm x: r • •r.I _.._. — — SMALL DIAMETER BAND-SEAL• LARGE DIAMETER ADJUSTABLE REPAIR COUPLINGS ADJUSTABLE-REPAIR COUP-LNit= (ARC) FOR MAINLINE SEWERS (TYPE Z) (ARC) FOR MAINLINE SEWERS • Available in 4"-12" diameters • Available in 15"-42" diameters • Engineered and designed for the insertion of • Couplings are 10" wide and come with four replacement sections of pipe or new fittings multiple take-up stainless steel clamps to into an existing sewer line provide superior seal on pipe ends • Split 300 Series stainless steel shear ring with • Flanged bushings accommodate differences take-up clamps are designed to fit variable in pipe ODs of up to 6" outer pipe diameters • Flanged bushings allow for easy positioning • Holds pipe or fitting in alignment and provides into the coupling during installation superior shear strength • Couplings and flanges are manufactured of • Rubber collar with 316 Series stainless steel ' EPDM rubber making them resilient to and clamps provides a water tight seal unaffected by normal soil conditions and • Also used for flexibility and strength at the sewer gases first joint out of a manhole • 300 Series stainless steel outside shear rings • Meets or exceeds ASTM Specification C 425 (ARC) • Meets or exceeds Standard Specifications for • T-bolt clamps have a 316 Series stainless steel Public Works Construction (Greenbook), Type Z strap and a torque rating of 150 in./lb. to provide even greater sealing performance IMPORTANT, When ordering large diameter couplings, specify the outside diameter of the two pipes to be joined. UU/ LU/ GUUG UJ.UJ I .)UJL f f'4Ul4 1,11J.-,LUI1 I..LH 1 I HUL 1 4 - �_- gEMEMENE tom.,,.— .r_.--T—„„, .v ". : __ , . .a.s®. ..az ' w.. a s _ -- — v=:acaoow v•./\• I•II o.. a ,11 ..101r ILA III Mission Clay Products Band-Seal' Mainline Vitrified Play Pine anti c =_o4se4.0_ t-. meet or exceed the following standards: • ASTM C 700 and ASTM C 425 which supersede Federal specifications SS-P-361e and SS-P-359b • SSPWC, Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, also known as "Greenbook'1 • International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials oiii, lat— wr� latt�i.i.�1 IRNIIIIM _------- ----- --- 'II Fa4 IPh for Field Installation .... 1 heavy-uuty , -- I )near King ,..#0"....- _ IFactory Applied _ -_ -__.=_-__----- - — '." — _ _ -- �11111111111111111111 Band-Seal* Coupling Detail vmnlcu Amy orwnr mg AJIM t.Nu JJrWU. JOG.ZU/—d Method for Testing Clay Sewer Pipe ASTM C 301 SSPWC'Sec.207-8.5 ' Installation of Vitrified Clay Sewer Pipe ASTM C 12 Joint,Type D ASTM C 425 SSPWC'Sec.208-2.2 Stainless Steel ASTM A 167 Clamp 300 Series,Type 316 Bolt 300 Series Nut 300 Series i •Standard Specifications for Puoiic Works Construction t)b/Lb/LUt)L UJ7:YJ7 77t)7L( (4b14 IVI1J:JIUIV I..L.HI 1 HUL ♦J . .a `) All Mission Band-Seale' Vitrified Clay Pipe Is extra strength and plain end • Type 1 does not include shear ring and is available in 4" and 6" diameter • Type 2 includes shear ring and is available in 6", 8", 10", and 12" diameter • Highly resistant to attack from sewer gases, acids, alkalis and most other corrosive products that commonly plague most domestic and industrial sanitary sewer systems • Quick and easy assembly in the trench; • _ -- :-- r s n.. c- __ " - _. aY.# --- --_ aecomposition and abrasion 4 rncl constant load conditions_--- _ -- 6 INCH A $ INCH cam.__ -- —_--___ --- ='--'3t� �10 INCH ---- ------- -------- 1111111W--- -_.- a = - -- - _--- --- - - _ - _ ---- _ -_ - 12 INCH •Nominal � r� , Y.=T Co— .._ - - - 11 r liaffl -- -_ --- -- __ — --_----- --=-—— - -- 4 4-8 1- 10� —2000 -- --- 2000 11/16 5.45 -— 6 41/2-6 20 2000 2000 7/8 7.75 B 41/2-8 30 2200 2200 11/16 9.90 10 41/2-6 45 2400 2400 11/8 12.40 12 41/2-6 60 2600 2600 15/16 14.60 Dimensions subject to normal variations as defined by ASTM C 700. OD/Lb/LUCIL rJ7.r.17 TDUD.4( i4014 1'1lJJ./LA1 IILMl In�.l� +� II - 7-- ---- ----- - ---- --'----- .;-w•.. ® Coupling-and Boshh - .•_«- --_ --------...----- _ _::,-s,;, Pipe D.D. 11 0408 428 3'Type 1 Mission Standard Coupling 4.25 1 4.50 ,,., 0502 419 1 4'x 2'°fain End Bushing 2 26 2.44 4;, 4 i 4'i pc 0 Mission Standard Coupling - _ 5.31 5.50 0502 427 4'x 2'Bead End Bushing 12.58 2.68 r OM 852 6 type 1 Mission Standard Coupling . _ r_55..i 7,75 i j '^-•E i^ 1 2-i 3 Plain t--nn'oshing I (use w/coupling 0403 4Z6) VI Latir$378 6'Type 2 Plastic Shear Ring Coupling 7.58 7.78 ---• .�._...__._.._ .-.._,_... 0505 417 A'x 3'Plain End Bushing.d 3 25 3.- 0408 751 6'Adjustable Repair Coupling 7.50 8.00 --• - - _- ___ ._. _ 1^" Repair Coupling 05U 426 r4'x 3'Bead End Bushing 3,32 3.50 • 6'Adjus�b!e Coupling•Oversize 7.50 8:13- _.._.-.... ..t _qa _._ - nrcne At5 4•v 4'Plain End!Bushing --- 1.29 1 17 - F wee fa , C'1 e 2 ris ilc�ileJ,Aln• LUU nn' r'.8U •• IU.UU ••'m u t _ • -rL� y� J Lowing) - 0504 423 4'x 4'Bead End Bushing 4.35 . ._4.53 ' ae5 781 L 8'Adjustable Repair Coupling 9.75 1' .... y . • -_....._.....,. 10.1__... CAI A A r _...1 vn I v _ 0_04 431 ; 4 Asbestos..ement or 4. 4 l469 327 1 n'Aaius'Wbte Repair Coupling•Ovsrsizs 10.00 10.50 Bituminous fiber Bushing •F O419 7°oa 1 10'Typo 2 Plastic Shear Ring Coupling 12,25 12.50 _ I}- ----••-_-.-___._ __-i....._._.__ .� r. ;__ -.._ _.......- -..._ 0504586 14"x/'Thinwall Plastic Bushing4,10 4.25 } ,,,,, 1L 1508110t 6'Plain End Bushing 6,13 .I- .8.50 .j..'_.ble Repair Coupling.O Oversize ._. n ,. 10 Adjustable Repair Coupling ' r.,v,av � i�i:d uaKb�F no y• -Yef9ild 5U i3.i3 � '•-1 _...__........._.... .. .. J.• .! ..._ - ..__..•-.•.•--••_-••• 500 428 6'Bead End Bushing 6.50 8.15 w. ' 0e i2 72S , 12'Type 2 Plastic Shear Ring Coupling 14.5 14.74 --•_.__...1..,._.......__. __......__.._-__ -,--- ! 0508 430 j 6'Asbestos Cement or 6.61 7.06 - 1z ess5 l i2'Adjustable Repair Coupling 14.25 114.52 Bituminous Fiber Bushing y ir 0412 94 12'Adjustable Repair Coupling-Oversize 14.13 15,00 0508 N6 8'Plain End Bushing 8.25 8.53 0406 736 6'x 4'Increaser/Reducer Coupling 7,55 7.75 0508 424 8'Asbestos Cement Bushing 8.63 9 06 5.28 5.45 .-. -_-•-----_._...__- --__.._... ..._. ., _0B1O 412 10.Plaln_End Bushing..--_••_-•• ,_. . 1915 __10 50 . 0408 884 •• 8'x 6' ncreaser/ eduoer iR Coupling 9.25 1013. 0510 d20..,. _10'Asbestos Cement Bushing 10.88 11.13 0512 418 12'Plain End Bushing 11 88 1 12.50 0512 428 . 12'Asbestos Cement Bushing 1 13.00 13.25 WARNING CALIFORNIA PRO►OSmON 65 "Dry cutting or grinding these products may expose you to silica which is known • to the State of California to cause cancer and other chemicals which are known to the State of California to cause cancer,birth detects and other reproductive harm," • . C i. MISSIabli f A Division of MCP Industries,lc-_. a ' \N Mr1 / --`,--..__1j_____..--- REGIONAL SALES OFFICES Southarn Northern Post Office Box 549 880 81 st Avenue PC MEMBER • Corona,CA 92878 Oakland,CA 94621 tel:(909)277-4600 tel:(510)568-0800 fax:(909)273-2708 fax:(510)568-2699 email:kagmcpl@aol.com email:mcpoak®pacbell.net WILL CALL YARDS N C P I • • Corona, CA Oakland, CA Santa Fe Springs, CA M.no et g�..a.c•�r•I•o=c 23835 Temescat Canyon Road 880 81st Avenue 94621 13344 Cambridge Street • tel:(909).277-4600 tel:(510)568-0800 tel:(562)229-172Z lax:(909)273-2708 fax:(510)558-2699 fax:(562)229.1732 QUALITY • AESEAAC • 4 - 1 CITY OF FONTANA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT ENGINEERING DIVISION 8353 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, CA 92355 (909) 350-7610 Permit No. : 02070319 Issued: 07/10/2002 Job Address 8353 SIERRA AV Spec Plan: Applicant : Contractor: FONTANA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY A D GENERAL ENG. CONST. , INC. 8353 SIERRA AVE 2829 N. GLENOAKS BLVD. ST. 101 FONTANA CA, 92335 BURBANK, CA 91504 PHONE:• (818) 559-7383 LICENSE: Description: BID NO. SP-46-02 . SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE AND JUNIPER SEWER IMPROVEMENTS. NO FEE PERMIT PER RDA. �W�--- ---- FEE SUMMARY By Category: FEE PAID DUE . * NO FEES * Permission is hereby granted to the applicant to perform the work des *:ibed below. It is expressly agreed that the work will be performed in acco lance with applicable laws, regulations and specifications of the City of F itana i151 Pe . t Signature ' Land Development Section . All work shall be insp. :ted Author" zed Inspector Signoff: CONSTRUCTION ITEMS 02070319 BID NO. SP-46-02 . SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE AND JUNIPER SEWER IMPROVEMENTS . NO FEE PERMIT PER RDA. I Z 'd cross-sSS .00000000000000000000 1 eZS :OT 20 et Inc s NOTIFICATIONS : • Permittee shall notify the Inspection Section 24 hours in advance: (1) date work is to start, and (2) date work has been completed. Telephone (909) 350-7610 . UNDERGROUND UTILITIES LOCATION: Prior to beginning any activity in this permit, the Permittee and/or Permittee ' s authorized agent shall notify Underground Service Alert (> ;A) at 1•-800-422-4133 at least 48 hours in advance to coordinate the perm activity. SURVEY MONUMENTS : Section 8771 of the Business and Professions Code makes the perpetuat. m of Survey Monuments the responsibility of anyone performing construciton /ork. When street intersections are to be excavated or known survey monumen.' ; are to be destroyed, notify the City Engineer' s Office (telephone 909-350 ;640) at least two weeks prior to construction. TRAFFIC CONTROL: The "State of California Manual of Traffic Control" provides informat: )n necessary to carry out proper and safe traffic control . Should a contractor not provide proper traffic control after the first advisor' warning, the City can cite the contractor or other contracting agency tnder City Code Section 25-121 and 25-123 (a) . The penalty for notproviding or the required proper traffic safety in the public right-of-way is a misdemeanor with a fine of up to $1, 000 . 00 or up to 6 months in jail < both. Inspection time required by improper traffic control will be b: led to the contractor. We request that you provide strict traffic control at all times using .he signs, barricades, delineations, warning lights, flagger control and Clashing arrow signs, as required. The normal lane to be maintained : . 12 feet wide . Any deviation from this may require temporary pavement markings or other measures. Flashing arrow signs are required for motorist safety, depending upon street and traffic conditions. Consult the City Public Works Inspect( - if you require assistance. ROAD CLOSURE: Closure can only be granted by the City Council. A formal request mu; be submitted to the city Engineer' s office. Allow one week to rocess rE guest for overnight inspection. Permittee shall notify the Fire D artment nd Fontana Police Department prior to any period of road closur . PAYMENT OF COSTS: Permittee is liable for and shall pay upon demand all Communilty Develc ,ment Department costs related to the permit including but not restricted tc the costs of repairing or restoring any City jurisdiction streets. to the : me or equal conditon that they were in before being cut or damaged as a ] sult or permittee ' s activities. HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSE: Permittee agrees to indemnify the Cify of Fontana, its officers, agent and employees against and hold them free and harmless of and fro all cla: z and liabilities of any kind arising out of, in connection wit or rest ting from negligence on part of Permittee, its officers, agents, ntractoi and employees in connection with work undertaken under this permit, and dE end 1 E 'd 20SS-6SS •00000000000000000000 , e2S :OI ao 21 Int 1 I JOB NUMBER: DESIGN NOTES: 20-02-066 6" 48"I.D. - 6" 1)LOAD CRITERIA: SOUTH BAY FOUNDRY OUTLET Si' ' c , *' _ - N X AASHTO H-20 TRAFFIC LOADING(16,000 LBS. .{� ` � n,t r � `F a Ew ,. I = "- }� WHEEL LOAD)*FOR MANHOLES&RING&COVERS. �) SBF-1170(22 f"0) ■ ■ ■ C\� RING AND COVER _ 't 0 INCIDENTAL H-20 TRAFFIC LOADING g — �4 MARKED: "S" 4 SUBMITTAL. • �� (OCCASIONAL TRAFFIC,OFF STREET �'7 � -�1 11 ILI l l LOCATIONS) = A I I I I A JOB#: Q1-Q�p 0 PARKWAY LOADING(300 LBS./SQ. FT.) = V i' A, JOB ACE:w ur(�,u�ii)� X H-20 SURCHARGE AND LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE. O 'I I Al If _,�j. If,ee /L4'JA $C&eOR PRECAST MANHOLES. Q• ' :!' 2)CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH: 4500 PSI @ 28 DAYS. la- W SECTION _ — �7 0 i �% ROBERTSONS READY MIX NO.: OPC 1. 1 ' .;I� 1 - K 3)STEEL REINFORCING YIELD STRENGTH Fy=60,000 PSI V) ■ ■ ■ `` i NO EXCEPTIONS IONS TAKEN KT PER ASTMA-615. u4 Cf4 ‘� f ALL JOINTS TO BE SEALED USING RAMNEK JOINT SEALANT. I" 0 V AMEND AND RESUBMIT r rr 4) * U — .r .-P ! MEETS OR EXCEEDS ASTM C-990. N--L; 1 iiiil RETURNED WITH 5)ALL MANHOLES MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 0 � j ASTM C 478- �' a 1 II 1 lull EXCEPTIONS NOTED WSTRUCTURAL REINFORCEMENT DATA: INLET *ASTM A82,ASTM A 185 �,}, �,� r> ASTM A496,ASTM A 615 DATE l ! REVIEWED: -7-0�/ I I ALL ACCEPTABLE STEEL C ■ ■ ■ PLAN REINFORCING. • ! � ! ■ ■ s �� } s f As=NOT LESS THAN I 48" • { 0.0025 X I.D.IN F�I.D. SOUTH BAY FOUNDRY INCHES FOR ALL ' 1 AS= 0.I2 ! ' SBF-1170 �" REINFORCEMENT.CIRCUMFERENTIAL .--I �i RING ANDND COVERER I I • C.... MARKED: "S" 6rr *STEEL CAGE TO BE PLACED . I I IN THE CENTER THIRD OF L .-.- . .1 ■ ■ ■ MANHOLE WALL THICKNESS. _„ a• _ 2 f 12 • "MAX. p STEEL REINFORCEMENT CAGE DESIGN= z go--1 r-+ 2 X 8- W2.0 X W2.0 STEEL WELDED WIRE FABRIC O� 1 v I a0 As =MINIMUM 0.12/VFT a CONCRETE:MIN 4500 psi @ 28 DAYS. UJ e 36„ — = U = 24„ 0 ■ ■ ■ W V e 7 O c Q = b W = J C 7 In �-- POLYPROPYLENE TONGUE — 8 a-' �� 1 Q STEPS @ 12"O.C. --i 7 *TO BE FIELD l m (LANE#P-14938) VERIFIED f Q �� —., 1 8 rr L 1 8 rr 7 48"0 SHAFTING 1„ i f�Li rr FILENAME: AS REQUIRED 4 7S B 0 2 0 6 6A 6"THK. _ e 9 (12"MIN./48"MAX.) 3 a 1 n WALLS -48" O-- DATE: 7 i 7-0 2 1�n 1 rr. • 16"MIN. 2" SCALE: 24"MAX. 1 4" i 4" N.T.S. �� SHEET NUMBER: 1 OF 1 '•Y�` �:�• ; GROOVE 3 n DRAWN BY: • '..::,: 1 4 C. BRADBURY CAST-IN-PLACE •' ' ' '•1 9rr BASE(660 C 4000) I ASSOCIATED READY MIX - p c #C-87001 - JOINT DETAIL • CHINO READY MIX `'°Mraki #1543 SECTION A - A CALIFORNIA DIVISION , Q T/v 1. . 1 2 (TWELVE) 13820 SLOVER AVE. "D" FONTANA, CA 92337 PH: (909) 427-1138 FAX: (909) 427-1810 JOB NUMBER: DESIGN NOTES: 2 0-0 2-0 6 6 6" 60"I.D. 6" 1)LOAD CRITERIA: OUTLET SOUTH BAY FOUNDRY llt. AASHTO H-20 TRAFFIC LOADING(16,000 LBS. SBF-1252 (30" 0) WHEEL LOAD)*FOR MANHOLES&RING&COVERS. WI Q �\11 RING AND COVER �—I 0.--11 MARKED: "S„ CI H-20 TRAFFIC LOADING (OCCASIONAL TRAFFIC, OFF STREET C ) 1 T1 1,4' I 1 LOCATIONS) = I--- I, 11 0 PARKWAY LOADING(300 LBS./SQ. FT.) A ,�i ; ► A z } O /�.• , • \ X H-20 SURCHARGE AND LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE. O •'•'•'• *FOR PRECAST MANHOLES. �C Q i :.: .` FOR ■ Li f - . 2)CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH: 4500 PSI @ 28 DAYS. ti �--�—� 1 I ..❖.❖.•.., ROBERTSONS READY MIX NO.: OPC 1. - 3)STEEL REINFORCING YIELD STRENGTH Fy=60,000 PSI W f4 ; i PER ASTM A-615. Q _ �♦ CI\ E- CIC� \ 4)ALL JOINTS TO BE SEALED USING RAMNEK JOINT SEALANT. 0 - , \• *MEETS OR EXCEEDS ASTM C-990. Q I--� (_ CC { ` , I to 0.-V 5)ALL MANHOLES MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH O �� �'•L I r r' ASTM C-478. �' (f Q. �; �, '' STRUCTURAL REINFORCEMENT DATA: { Lij I' *ASTM A82,ASTM A 185 nC ASTM A496,ASTM A 615 I+T ' �i� ALL ACCEPTABLE STEEL As=NOT LESS THAN _ I REINFORCING. I .1_, I ■ • I-_— 60" �) ' �C f� INLET 0.0025 X I.D.IN • I.D. L ■ ■ INCHES FOR ALL I A - 0.1 55 I t ■ ■ �C PLA 5 = W N REINFORCEMENT. • I I � . .____ *STEEL CAGE TO BE PLACED I I • V 1 SOUTH BAY FOUNDRY IN THE WAL THICKNESS.MANHOLE CENTER THIRD OF � �SBF-1252(30" 0) ■ ■ ■ RING AND COVER MARKED: "S" F 6' Q STEEL REINFORCEMENT CAGE DESIGN= ��� , 1, ,y_` ti 2 X 8-W2.5 X W2.0 STEEL WELDED WIRE FABRIC --1Z 0 - - o As =MINIMUM 0.15/VFT O f 12"MAX, to CONCRETE:MIN 4500 psi @ 28 DAYS. I— = U V i[•-•-c 3'0" r �--� _ W 30" !� U v Ill _ e J �_ POLYPROPYLENE TONGUE l 8" Fes- STEPS @ 12"O.C. - t (LANE#P-14938) 0 Q O O e ' *TO BE FIELD 1 8" � �- -L � 1 8" i—�. VERIFIED 1t In FILENAME: C 7 60" 0 SHAFTING 4 4 SB020666 1 DATE: _1 7_O Z e 1 (12"MIN./48"MAX.) y .. AS REQUIRED 1 6"THK. 60" 0 4 I, 4 u WALLS e ' 1 2" SCALE: n' T 1 4" -1 r 1 4" 1 V. 1 N.T.S. 16"MIN. i 24"MAX. SHEET NUMBER: 1 OF 1 -.4-: i••• : 2,. GROOVE �„ DRAWN BY:• C. BRADBURY CAST-IN-PLACE •:;,•. BASE(660-C-4000) '/ Email ASSOCIATED READY MIX JOINT DETAIL �oMPpN, #C-87001 CHINO READY MIX k, CALIFORNIA DIVISION #1543 SECTION A - A 13820 SLOVER AVE. "D" QTY■ ■ (THREE) PH: (909) 27- 380 1 Ilil y.I\VUUIC 1\air, JV.TJVV-VVVJ 1 V.VIJVII ri Cl.a�l VGLC.LILLILVVL IIIIIC. IV.VV.JV my, rays`t VI T • • RoBERTsoN , s ROCK * SAND * BASE MATERIALS READY MIX CONCRETE Date: 02/19/2002 . !. ,Mix L D. : #OPC-1 Project: Contractor: OLSON PRECAST COMPANY Batched at Fontana Plant Description: 4500 psi Pump/Place Mix- Precast Yard Strength (Pc): 4500 psi W/C ratio: 0.46 I „ Slump: 4 Max Sack Content: 6.86 sk. Max Size of Agg.: 1 " Gal/sk.: 5.25 Pump Type: Boom Pump or 4"Line Un. Wt.: 148.2 MIX DESIGN PROPORTION I Contents Batch Wt. %used Sp. Gr. Volume Cement 645 100 3.15 3.28 ` Fly Ash-Class F 0 2.33 0.00 • Sand 1336 44 2.62 8.17 , 1-1/2"x 3/4" • 0 0 2.67 0.00 i 1"x#4. 1444 47 2.65 8,73 3/8"x#8 276 9 2.65 1.67 i Water 36.0 gal. 299.9 4.81 . Entrapped Air 1.25 % 0.34 II . Wt.= 4001 Vol. = 27.00 ADMIXTURES: WRDA 64 3.0 ozicwt 19.4 oz. j AGGREGATE GRADATIONS Size % 2" 1 1/2" 1" 3/4" 3/8" No 4 No 8 No 16 No 30 No 50 No 100 Vo 200 1 1/2" 0 100 95 33 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 47 100 100 95 70 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3/8" 9 100 100 100 100 96 18 2 1 1 • 0 0 0 WCS 44 100 100 100 100 100 98 77 60 39 18 6 2 Combined 100 100 100 98 86 58 45 34 26 17 8 3 1 Sand Source: Robertson's Rialto ' Rock Source: Robertson's Rialto Aggregates meet ASTM C-33 Cement Portland Cement Type Il/V Admixtures: W. R. Grace (909) 685-2200 ext 360 P.O Box 33140, Riverside, Ca., 92519 Fax (909)360-8883 From:Rich Nagler 9093608B83 To:Bruce Johnson Date: 12/26/2001 Time: 11:04:00 AM Page 4 of 13 Ro3ERT s ON' S ROCK * SAND * BASE MATERIALS READY MIX CONCRETE I Date: 10/22/2001 • Mix I.D. : #0PC-1 Project: VARIOUS PROJECTS Contractor. OLSON PRECAST COMPANY Batched at Fontana Plant Description: 4500 psi Pump/Place Mix- Precast Yard Strength(fc): 4500 psi W/C ratio: 0.46 Slump: 4 " Sack Content: 6.86 sk. Max. Size of Agg.: 1 " Gal/sk.: 5.25 Pump Type: Boom Pump or 4"Line Un. Wt.: 148.2 1 i I TRIAL BATCH RESULTS I i Field Test Results Compressive Strength Results Slump: 3 " ASTM C143 Load psi Concrete Temp: 73 Degrees ASTM C1064 7 Day 144310 5105 Air Temp : 80 Degrees 28 Day 192490 6809 Time : 11:30 am 2a Day 176350 6309 DateCast: 11/15/01 28 Day 184370 6522 Date Rcvd in Lab: 11/16/01 28 Day 189900 6717 I Cast By: Rich Nagler 26 Day 188340 6662 28 Day Avg. 6604 j 1 III, I • j l (909) 685-2200 ext 360 P 0 Box 33140. Riverside, Ca . 92519 Fax (909) 360-8883 f 02/14/.2002 16:07 7136737714 HENRY SEALANTS PAGE 02 ,i" rFGHMAL g =°iF yrt DATA SEALANTS DIVISION { , . DATA Henr1277 Boyles Street • Houston, Texas 77020 ,., ; f B LLETIN loll Fro (500) 231.4549 • Fax: (713) 673 7714 • �QNAL hg4,,, m a4 ' E ^american 3Z+q `�P FLEXIBLE PLASTIC GASKETS c Jape 4rS ASS° SINGLE GASKET METHOD association ASSOCIATEASSOCIATE MEMBER memaenFor Sealing Reinforced Concrete Culverts, Storm Drains&Sewer Pipe 'I-His BULLETIN DESCRIBES A PLASTIC GASKET MATERIAL THAT MEETS HUNDREDS OF CITY, COUNTY,STATE AND FEDERAL.SPECi- FICATIONS,ALL OF WHICH ARE BASED ON YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL, PROVEN FIELD PERFORMANCE. RAM-NNK® Gasket PaperCS 0 • --..,.....„...„........) I ' GROOVE ' RAM=NEK® Primer, ; a e I� 0 when needed ' The ON THE-BANK FABRICATION of a ItAM NEIO' Note Fyrexteriorequeeze•out,place RAM-IVEKe on the For Concrete Pipe of All Sim, Joint.The sketch above is intended only to represent the tongue of the pipe join;as show..,fir interior RAM- proper Positioningof the preformed plaer gasket strip. 1VEKosquecs+or4pl�s�A1K-NF,Kmg{tkeisoniheglooue Shapes and Service * RAM-NEK® Primer may not be required, but it is recommended. MINIMUM INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS (Single Gasket) TRENCH CONDITION — Conditions in the sewer PIPE ALIGNMENT —Care.shall be taken to properly . trench shall be such that pipe jointing can be accom- align the pipe before joints are forced home. During plished without getting mud, silt, gravel or other insertion of the tongue, the pipe shall be partially foreign material into the joint. In general this means supported by the crane to maintain concentricity that the trench shall be adequately dewatered, with a until the plastic gasket is properly compressed in the firm bottom free of muck. joint space. GASKET APPLICATION — Apply one coat of RAM • - NEKe Primer to clean,dry joint surfaces and allow to PULL—UP OR PUSH—UP PRESSURE—Sufficient dry. Remove the paper wrapper from one side only pressure shall be applied in making the joint to assure of the two-piece wrapper on the RAM-NEK® gasket. that the joint is home and evidence of a slight squeeze- -. The outside paper will protect the gasket and assure out of the plastic gasket occurs at the outside or against stretching. Before laying the pipe in the inside of the pipe joint. Backfilling can proceed as trench, attach the plastic gasket strips end-to-end to soon as jointing has been completed. the leading edge of the tongue or groove of each pipe joint, forming a continuous gasket around the entire circumference of the pipe joint. Remove outside wrapper TECHNICAL SERVICE — In the event of difficultywith prior to jointing the pipe. the use or application of RAM-NEK® Products, im- mediately contact the Technical Service Department of HANDLING — Pipe handling after the plastic gasket the HENRY COMPANY, Sealants Division. has been affixed shall be carefully controlled to avoid bumping the gasket and thus displacing it or covering it with dirt or other foreign material. Any gaskets so *For the recommended size and quantity of strips, disturbed shall be removed and replaced if damaged refer to the estimating guide on opposite page. and repositioned if displaced.. . RAM-NEK® Flexible Plastic Gaskets meet the following national specifications: o Federal Specifications 55-5-210 A, "Sealing Compound, Preformed Plastic for Pipe Joints", Type 1, Rope Form_ • AA51-1TO Designation M-198 751, Type B, Flexible Plastic Gasket(Bitumen). • ASTM Designation C990-91 IMPORTANT • For maximum adhesion, or in cold or wet weather, it Is recommended that both the RAM•NEK®gasket strip and the joint surfaces to be sealed be lightly torched immediately prior to application. 02/14/2002 ,16:07 7136737714 HENRY SEALANTS PAGE 03 % HOW TO SPECIFY q. RAM-NEKe Preformed Pestle Gasket meets or exceeds all re- alkalies and saturated hydrogen sulfide)for a period of 30 days. ' quirements of Federal Specifications SS-S-210A*,"Sealing Corn- The Sealing compound shall be produced from blends of re- pound,Preformed Plastic For Pipe Joints",Type I,Rope Form- fined hydrocarbon resins and plasticizing compounds reinforced Such Plastic gasket shall be equal to RAM-NEK'a as manufac- with inert mineral filler,and shall contain no solvents, irritating tured by Henry Company,Sealants Division of Houston,Texas, fumes or obnoxious odors.The compound shall not depend on and shall meet the following requirements. oxidizing, evaporating, or chemical action for Its adhesive or SS-S-210A,(3.4ADHESION&HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE). cohesive strength.It shall be supplied in extruded rope-form of The sealing compound shall not leak at the joints(while being suitable cross-section and of such sizes as to fill the joint space tested at 10 psi)foraperiod of 24 hours,as tested in section 4.5.2. when the pipes are laid.The sealing compound shall be protected (3.5 SAG OR FLOW RESISTANCE)-vertical and overhead 1" by asuitable removable two-piece wrapper.The two-piece wrap- wide joints no sagging shall be detected(while being tested at 135° pershall be so designed that one-half maybe removed longitudinal- F)for a period of 5 days. ly without disturbing the other half to facilitate application of the (3.6 CHEMICAL RESISTANCE)no visi ble deterioration of the seal- sealing compound.The flexiblepiasticgasketshallalsomeetthe ing compound (when Immersed separately in solution of acid, requirements as stated in the following table: COMPOSITION TEST METHOD MIN. MAX. Bitumen(petroleum plastic content) ASTM D 4 50 - 70 Ash-inert Mineral Matter AASHTO T 111 30 50 Volatile Matter ASTM D 6 - 2.0 PROPERTY TEST METHOD MiN. MAX. Specific Gravity @ 77°F ASTM D 71 1.20 1,35 Ductility @ 77°F(cm) ASTM D 113 5.0 .- *Softening Point ASTM D 36 320°F - Penetration 77°F (150 gms) 5 sec. ASTM D 217 50 120 'Flash Point,C.O,0. ASTM D 92 600°F - 'Due to the mature of the material, each sample to be tested must be manually kneaded, in lieu of heating and pouring, into various molds suggested by ASTM Standards to reduce the void Content and improve testing accuracy and reproducibility. DATA SHEET AND ESTIMATING GUIDE (Approx.) SINGLE GASKET METHOD IIMPORTANT: The suggested gasket sizes CONCRETE CULVERTS, STORM DRAINS shown will generally allow visual evidence of Minimum Requirements Approximate (Tolerance -i- 10%) "Squeeze Out" after the pipes are properly . jointed,and will"Fill the Joint", PIPE PRIMER CUT LENGTHS SIZE PER 100 ITS. PER JOINT __ _ 12" 1Sgals. li/=pcs. 1"x2'6" GENERAL 15" 1.9 gah. 2 pcs. 1"x 2'6" For use with round C-76 mortar Joint pipe,modified C-443,single a71d rouble offset and recessed pipe and for oval,arch,flat base, 18" 2.7 gals. 21 pcs. 1"x2'6" box and manhole pipe structures. Suitable for joints with (1) 24" 3.8 gals. 2pcs. _ills"x3'6" Tongue and groove slopes or tapers?to 14°;(2)Oul of roundup 30" 6.2 gals. 2%pcs. i lie'x 3'6" to#1,"and (3) Annular space tile" to 3/�"• 36" 8.5gals 3 pcs. 13 "x3'6" DIMENSIONS 42" • 9.5 gals. 3%pcs. 11/4"x3'6" . Gaskot dimensions listed per pipe size are sized to fit most pipe 48" 12.0 gals. _ 4 pcs. 1N"x 3'6"• meeting the above specification and having an approximate V." 64"- 15.0 gals 41/2 1tC5, ix/"x 3'6"wide annular space after pipe are coupled,Check these dimen- slons with your pipe. Gaskets are available to fit any specific 60" 20.0 gals. 5 pcs. 1a}4"x 3'6" dimensions at proportionate prices. 66" 25.Ogals. 5�2pcs 14/4"x3'6" PACKAGE . 72" 30.0 gals. 6 pas. Z"x 3'6" RAM-NEK® Gaskets are shipped in fiber cartons in straight cut s4" 32.0 gals. 7pes. 2"x3'6" lengths for easy makeup of joints with number Of pieces of each 96" 35,0gab, epa, 2"x 3'6" type listed. (RAM-NEK® is self-welding,sticks to Itself,guarantee- ing continuous sealing at iaps).'h"is packed 50 pcs per carton/1" TYPICAL RAM-NEK GASKET -35 pcs.per carton/114"-28 pcs.per carton/13"-13 pcs. per carton/2"-10 pcs.per carton.Each piece IslrtdIvldualIywrappod in SIZE APPROX. SHAPE CROSS-SECTION IN'/FT. LTIS./PC, a two-piece paper wrapper for easy handling and application. Y,• 4"x 14" .47 sq.In. 5.6 .65 lb. "The Commissioner, Federal Supply Service, General Services 1" fib"x 1'/z" 94 sq.In. 11.3 1.3 lbs. Administration,approved the Reinstatement of SS-S-210A by their 11/4" 14"x 2" 1.25 sq.in. 15.0 2.7 lbs. notice of December 16, 1961. 1 1/2 0/a" x 2 1/2" 1.65 sq.in. 22.5 3.5 lbs. Printed copies of this notice are available upon request. 1,/4" • 1"x 3" 3.00 sq,in. 36.0 5.3 lbs. 2" 1" x 31/2" 3.50 sq.In. 42.0 7.0 lbs. ©1905 Henry Company.All Rights Reserved. Sc3TC:795 ... . fip_ I4938 • . • . Step # . 4 ' '0°"•" —. `', P-14850 m.k. . . ._. _ . 0_7:4.1,,...,,„ •.• • .:::• Mil.-"..51'1;212 1..., . . 0. ,,,.......„,,:,„, • . . o 0 0 Bright Red Reflectors ee 0o pe 6"tn.nw, o° • - 00000000000000 - o - oov000 ' 000000000000000eeoov000e _� .lr. • '� 113,4• sr. H Step # P-14938 SPECIFICATIONS ' '�"� MI Lane Poly Steps mcct the requirements of . " ASTM C-478 and AASHTO M-199. The polypropylene conforms to ASTM D-4101. The %z"Grade 60 deformed reinforcing bar meets ASTM A-615. . RUNG 1/?Grade 60 Reber LANE POLYPROPYLENE MANHOLE STEPS CORPORATION fl - P.O.Box 925 • 18067 S.W. Lower aoones I•erry Rd_ ••l uatatin,uR 97uoi•5u3-684-0077 .800-666.0076 Fax 503-684-0077• Internet:www.lancinternational.corn -_ INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION FAX: (503) 684-0078 P.O. Box 925 • 18067 S.W. Lower Boones Ferry Road • Tualatin, Oregon 97062 • Phone (503) 684-0077 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE All of the LANE PLASTIC MANHOLE STEPS made of polypropylene conform to ASTM D4101-82. (The previous standard of ASTM 2146-82 was replaced by D4101-82.) The 1/2"reinforcing rod conforms to ASTM A-615 Grade 60 requirements. They meet and/or exceed ASTM C478-88 paragraph 13.4, AASHTO M-199, C497, SSPWC Standard Plan 636 and California Code of Regulations Title 8, General Industrial Safety Orders. . The LANE PLASTIC MANHOLE STEPS meet and/or exceed the 1,500 lbs. pullout force and the vertical deflection of 800 lbs.when properly installed. The steps are capable of withstanding an impact load of 70-ft-lb at 20 degrees F without cracking or fracturing. The minimum cross sectional area of the exposed portion of the step, including the deformed steep bar and excluding the non-slip tread surface, shall be 1.0 sq.in. The entire polypropylene plastic material surrounding the reinforcing steel bar is cast monolithically, minimum cover of 3/16". Lane International Corp. e ly ertson, Vice President Fatima.'��i`!C!7 say F v Llma. MANHOLE 1623 Cleve land Ave • NationalFRAME Sc COVE City, CA 91950 • 42 NorthTelephone: (619) Cluff • Lodi, CA p 474-8481 95240 • Telephone: (209)367-1940 A 22 o(7a ,------- notg:1Qcyn„9C o 4)4.6)69Q Q SBF t 170 4:4,4b �� um ,t,--000,, ,, �6 AR��S(5:r ji‘.7 SET WEIGHT `t� S Q !;r ? 210 Lbs `�� ��� e 225 Lbs • � Q I 0 i 435 Lbs 0 moo � o • o 0 0� • o 0 Y pick hole 273 " 26' > . 253/a" i F L_ 1�/Z" f` 22Vf ----I i 26'" 331/z" >. General Information Approved By: • All materials used in manufacturing shall conform to ASTM 48, Title: Class 35B. Agency: • Frame and cover bearing surfaces shall be machined to assure Date: close, quiet fit.* Comments Castings shall be dipped in black bituminous paint. • Frame and cover exceeds H-20 wheel loading. • nuth Bay FoundryCATALOG SECTION 1623 Cleveland Ave National City, CA 91950 (619) 474-8481 42 North Cluff Lodi, CA 95240 (209) 367-1940 A 25-2 • Diamond Tread S BF 1252 ♦�•��.♦•♦1♦ Set Weight �Y♦�♦P�0♦ A �o�o�� ��oo� Frame 170 Lbs '41"% -i�� ��.. A Cover 257 Lbs .<♦ te<♦�� • ♦� ►*..,,l-i,,♦.♦♦♦.,...‘.'.♦= ♦♦♦3i4:, Total 427 ♦ ♦♦♦�♦o♦♦♦4>�♦♦ice♦� I:< _�=<��Q<�.O 0�=<= tto ;(*..c\ % :♦ ♦' ��'Q�O♦ • 0�•00 ��• Also available: �p�1DO> Radial �•-•'}.T' as 33 7/8" -�- '�•�� �1��' `•dl • I 1 • I/ ILi A Block 1 A ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑.❑ ❑ ❑ ❑. 30" ` ❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ I� 33 1/2" —� oa 0 38" ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ SECTION A-A ❑ ❑ El ❑ General Information Approved * All materials used in manufacturing shall conform to ASTM 48, By: Class 35B. Title: Agency: * Frame and cover bearing surfaces shall be machined to assure Date: close, quiet fit. Comments Castings shall be dipped in black bituminous paint. * Frame and cover exceeds H-20 wheel loading. ASSOCIATED READY MIXED CONCRETE, INC. 4621 Teller Ave. Newport Beach, Ca. 92660 • CONCRETE MIX DESIGN PROPOSAL Date: 03 Oct 2001 MIX DESIGN#: C-87001 CONTRACTOR: Olsen Precast MAX SIZE AGG: attn. Rich 1.00"(C) DESIGN STRENGTH: 4000 PSI @ 28 DAYS SPEC. UNIT WT.: N/A SLUMP: 4.0"max PROJECT: .5bc';H et 4/ L4/V ..TcJv/,e Se- PLACEMENT METHOD: Pump/Place cife o c F-w'..aNA MATERIAL SOURCES: CEMENT: Riverside Type II -'/Portland • FLY ASH: Western Ash-Mohave COARSE AGGREGATE: CalMat, Corona FINE AGGREGATE: Fosters, Corona BATCH PLANT: Corona ADMIXTURES: Master Builders PRIMARY AGGREGATE GRADATION CONCRETE MIX DESIGN FOR 1 CUBIC YARD(SSD BASISI (%Passing U.S. Standard Sieve) SIZE: No.2 No.3 No.4 WCS COMB. MATERIAL AgQ%: 0% 48% 8% 44% 100% SP.GR. ABS.VOL. BATCFI CU.FT. LBJy. Cement: 7.00 Sks.. 3.15 3.35 65;3 2.0" 100 100 100 100 100 1.5" 93 100 100 100 100 Fly Ash 0.0% "F" 2.30 0.00 0 #2(1.5 )Agg.:0.0% 2.68 0.00 0 1,0" 36 95 100 100 98 #3 (1.0")Agg.:48.0% 3/4" 11 70 100 100 86 2.68 8.761.46 1464 3/8" 1 15 100 59 #4(3/8")Agg.:8.0% 2.68 24�1 #4 W/C. Sand: 44.0% 2.68 8.03 1342 2 13 97 45 Water: 38.5 Gal. 1.00 5.14 321 #8 _ 1 4 83 37 Air % 1.0% #16 0.27 1 63 28 Totals: 27.00 402:) #30 44 19 ADMIXTURE: #50 20 9 Pozz.200N 3.0 fl.oz./100#cmt.#100 J 4 2 Admix No. 2 0.0 fl.oz./100#cmt. 0. 0 #200 2 1 0.0 Admix No. 3 0.0 fl.oz./100#cmt. 0.0 F.M. 7.95 7.13 5.88 2.89 5.16 PERTINENT PROPERTIES: NOTES: Unit Weight, pcf: Cementitious Factor: W/(C+P): Plastic:149.2 PCF ( ) Estimated Strength, psi: 7.00 Sk/Cu.Yd. 0.49 By wt. 5200 PSI @ 28 Days 0.0% Replacement 5.50 Gal/Sack REMARKS: BY CLASS, SSPWC 201.1 (GREENBOOK)__660-C-4000 PREPARED BY: f `)1.1' 2 REVIEWED BY: Bob Nicoll Technical Service • 'LEASE FAX TEST RESULTS TO: (949) 263 - 0551 y ` , C s. t. ADY MIX CUCAMONGA & CHINO PLANTS Mix No. 1543 Date: 10/03/2001 Project Name: Soo?H H l y LAM)/.71/A4PER SEww2 Mix No.; 1543 Project Address: Fontana Spec: 4,000 psi()28 days General Contractor: Agg Size: 1" . Sub Contractor: Olson Precast Slump: 4.0" Cement Type: II/V Description: 7 O=C-4000 dmix 1" -Pei-Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction I Weight per Cubic Yard (S.S.D.) Absolute Volume Cement 528 lbs 2.69 C.F. Aggregate Ratios: Fly Ash 132 lbs 0.95 C,F, 0 % 1.5R Rook 0 lbs 0.00 C.F. 42 % 1 Rook 1260 lbs 7,56 C.F, 13 % 3/8"Rook 386 lbs 18.01 2.34 C.F. 45 % #1 Sand 1335 lbs 8.10 C.F. 0 % #2 Sand 0 lbs p_QO C.F. Admixtures: Ili 1. Pozz 200-N 19.8 fl.oz. 1.5 %Air 2. Entrapped 0.0 fl.oz. 0.41 C.F. Slump: 4,0" Allowable Water: 37 Gallons 308.21 lbs 4.94 C.F. Total: 39491bS 27.00 C.F. Unit Weight; 146,3 pof Materia l Source Sp.Gr. Sp.Wt. Cement Portland Type II/V 3.14 195.94 Type Y YP 2.22 138.53 1.5" Inland Rock,Cucamonga 2.68 167.23 1" Inland Rook,Cucamonga 2.67 166.61 3/8" Inland Rock,Cucamonga 2.64 164.74 Sand Inland Rook,Cucamonga 2,64 164.74 Sand Inland Rock,Cucamonga 2.64 164,74 Pozz 200-N Master Builders,Inc, 3 oz,/100 wt. Micro Air Master Builders,Inc. 0 oz./100 wt. Approved By; a on • eolur al Services . 1 SL50 SCHAEFER AVE,, CHINO, CA 91710 TEL: 909/6234040 FAX: 909/62S-4412 Combined Aggregate Gradation for Chino Ready Mix No. 1543 Chino&Cucamonga Plants Per Standard Specifications for PulDlic Works Construction(SSPWC) Aggregate Sources: Date:10/03/2001 1" Rock Inland Fie*,Cucamonga 3/8"Rock Inland Rock,Cucamonga Concrete Sand Inland Roak,Cucamonga Sieve 1" #3 3/8" #4 Concrete Sand Combined " C " Sieve Sizes: Rock Grading Rock Grading Sand Grading Grading Grading Sizes: Percentage 42 13 45 100 1 1/2" 100 100 100 100 100 1 1/2" 1" 98 90-100 100 100 99 95 - 100 1" 3/4" 75 55-85 100 100 90 77 - 93 3/4" 1/2" 100 100 100 58 1/2" Il -3/8" 15 8-20 9B 85100 100 100 64 50 - 70 3/8" #4 1 0-5 18 0-30 99 95-100 47 39 - 51 #4 #8 0 0-5 3 0-10 60 75.90 36 31 - 41 #8 #16 2 57 55-75 26 22 - 32 #18 #30 36 30-50 16 12 - 22 #30 #50 • 20 10-25 9 3 - 9 #50 #100 7 2-10 3 0 - 3 #100 #200 0 0-2 0 0-2 2 Q-5 1 0 - 2 #200 All Aggregates are certified to meet the requirements outlined In ASTM C-33 il "-sue e _ 4 C.RR nnuan,av Harvlla,George .. From: Harvilla, George Sent: Tuesday, November 04,2003 2:14 PM To: 'Evelyne Ssenkoloto' Subject: A.D. General Status Evelyne, This is my understanding of where we are with A.D. General. I encourage you to double-check my figures and assumptions. Retention as of Oct. '03 $28,771.34 Joint check to Ayala/A.D. General (Nov. '03) $ (5,595.70) C P It it r'�.( ft-17 7 Retention Balance $23,175.64 c r J r z Olsen Stop Notice (yet to be settled—is $ (19,660.00) Kevin negotiating this?) Retention Balance after Olsen claim settled $3,515.64 to be sent to A.D. General PLUS Settlement Agreement/Change Order 4 $8,325.79 cc. „c_( Jr ( - / 3— o signed by all parties but not yet paid to A.D. General due to letter from Bonding Attorney asking that no payments be made to A.D. General Associated Engineers, Inc. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 16k3311 E.SHELBY STREET ONTARIO,CA 91764-4872 (909)980-1982 FAX(909)941-0891 CITY OF FONTANA INV. DATE : 6/24/2004 REDEVELOPMENT/SPECIAL PROJECTS DEPT. INVOICE# : 046142A 8353 SIERRA AVENUE PROJECT# : 01-064 FONTANA,CA 92335 CLIENT REF: SP-46-01 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUE AND JUNIPER AVENUE SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS FINAL INVOICE FOR BALANCE OF FEE WITHHELD AS RETENTION FOR.PROFESSIONAL SERVICES • RENDERED THROUGH 05/31/03 TOTAL FEE AUTHORIZED 200,276.47 PERCENT COMPLETE AS OF 04/30/04 100.00% FEE EARNED TO DATE 200,276.47 LESS AMOUNT PAID TO DATE 187,061.35 RETAINED AMOUNT 13,215.12 AMOUNT DUE THIS INVOICE 13,215.12 Ando P.o./o.R.l 5 9`T ( c cie 6ted PARTIAL COMPUT# 5 �7 . �3 O 2 - Z�G.�'—O a Z� i- t i � R.E r c icy' AMI.; �-f''I1f?cnn 1'G' �rlt� TO pq 2 Z. 6 • 5— -4 73 40- S cf APPROVAk 3` a io REY4ENi * I Ivki t PLANNING DESIGNING SURVEYING CITY OF FONTANA REDEVELOPMENT&SPECIAL PROJECTS DEPT Associated Engineering So.Highland-Juniper-Walnut Payments and Adjustments: P.O 03-9P005 (597) Original 10% Paid Into Due into Total Assoc+ Invoice Date Check# Description Contract Contingency Total P.O Invoice Amount Payment to Assoc Retention Retention Retention pmt P.O.Balance Original Contract $ 69,500.00 $ 6,950.00 $ 76,450.00 $ 76,450.00 2/11/2002 95362 $ 32,185.26 $ 28,966.73 $ 3,218.53 c $ 28,966.73 $ 47,483.27 2/19/2002 95488 $ 8,322.30 $ 7,490.07 $ - $ 832.23 `. $ 7,490.07 $ 39,993.20 2/26/2003 95656 $ 14,169.43 $ 12,752.49 $ 1,416.94 $ - ` $ 14,169.43 $ 25,823.77 3/26/2002 96498 . $ 1,100.00 $ 1,100.00 $ - $ - 1' $ 1,100.00 $ 24,723.77 5/21/2002 98357 $ - $ - $ - ; $ - $ 24,723.77 5/28/2002 98357 $ 3,113.24 $ 2,691.92 $ 421.32 ;{ $ 2,691.92 $ 22,031.85 7/31/2002 100737 $ 5,231.37 $ 4,708.23 $ 523.14 $ - f $ 5,231.37 $ 16,800.48 Amendment#1(09/09/02) $ 83,030.00 $ 8,303.00 $ 91,333.00 ".'. $ - $ 108,133.48 10/15/2002 102410 $ 24,369.00 $ 21,932.10 $ 2,436.90 $ - i $ 24,369.00 $ 83,764.48 10/15/2002 102410 $ 14,972.50 $ 13,475.25 $ 1,497.25 $ - 's $ 14,972.50 $ 68,791.98 11/5/2002 103047 $ 28,688.05 $ 25,819.24 $ - $ 2,868.81 z $ ' 25,819.24 $ 42,972.74 11/5/2002 103163 $ 20,378.85 $ 20,378.85 $ - $ - ' $ 20,378.85 $ 22,593.89 1/21/2003 104823 $ 20,593.92 $ 20,593.92 $ - $ - $ 20,593.92 $ 1,999.97 Amendment#2(10/21/03) $ 32,493.47 $ 34 493 44 32 493 47 $ � s _. ,..., ..... ., � ,::� �. x- rf �,.-.t x �n,_" w�a0 a�:frxu ,R"99�.'it`'b'� �. .�;,,;5;::�«Nm;4 5 :. ;� er 3. Y' �-+r,:..-`'n t. V ,.1::, 3 _ . -:.,:,...., ,. .R: + .. �, ro '.r�tn.. .,.:� c a °`�.. . .a.- T. Hk. usss,.;r, .m �,'�,�r.tr +'� --, »... ... .«.. .r ..�,�,C e �c :.�. �.,�... s. a.,�.,,a..is. z ya.. r ..F, :. r w + 3. �1„-a�- ...�.w ., 2.. m 4 .,.. .: w ,..r. ,..a ,...r'.- Y -,_ro c. i E..�, �.. E a ..,.x,..,-s .f 'i.e; ; ... t t o .:?`..t .a ; _.. ,9. `1 .G 6 ,..r :i"' W:r 4 3 0:.9% ., > >r v. ,, v. , � ,» � x.�� ,,_,t,@,�a ,.,.a ,, .. ,.: �� ,.. s,,. ...I ..., '�.�,.�>. , ,� � .$.��.>_,...,27v152,5�.,s$-.,_ ..�.x, A..8. t 1 ,-r .r ,_ � Y'�.�'W, �a2�<3�,a•� ` ��r '- u. 3n�,_r. �- .-... 1 2� ..�rsu27�,: A t:.r�:,rw�,ift«�,s,�.,u�.ss._. .... �..,..-�Y..._,a... o;..m,ti.,Fr.,»A,N.,u.ua�,,,��.wi.�v?_,cS>a oi,.,.....:�s.��s�a.,,,�..,#_�.,,. ,.,.�,.�3vt�5 �'���r r�3 �� � R�����. P7�.c.$.`a„�aza..,x��:.�$l...r,-_.h..,,r.�.0 $ - $ - s $ - $ 7,340.89 $ 185,023.47 $ 15,253.00 $ 200,276.47 $ 200,276.47 5 A87 067$5. $ 5,874.23 $ 7,340.89 Pr: $ 192,935.58 t Leo !.�IEBIt_t.(1 1 I ,''2� ;p.L4cesse';,'aTOlit'd A6AYAiki kikt t, rsttgt ai? dint „ikt ins 'Firitfr rtati ntiar acli°$5Ef .23 1.Invoice 46142 for $ 27,152.55 **Attached 2.Amount due into retention that was never paid into retention or to Assoc. $ 7,340.89 Total Amendment $ 34,493.44 $ 13,215.12 Open Commit Amount $ (1,999.97) ' Adjusted Amendment $ 32,493.47 , A 6/29/2004 ecs Associated Eng.So Highland Juniper Walnut AnalysisDD.xls 1of2 Recording requested by City of Fontana When recorded mail to: City of Fontana Redevelopment & Special Projects Department 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, California 92335 No APN Available NOTICE OF.COMPLETION Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3086 of the Civil Code of the State of California and authorization of the City Council of the City of Fontana,NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that work on that certain project known as South Highland Avenue and Juniper Avenue Sewer System Improvements (SP-46-02) for the City of Fontana was completed and accepted by the City of Fontana on the 17th day of June , 2003. The said work was performed by A.D.General Engineering in accordance with the terms of written agreement dated the 20th day of June ,2002. STATE OF CALIFORNIA} Dated this 18a` day of June , 2003 CITY OF FONTANA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO} Ricardo Sandoval,P.E. City Engineer Subscribed and sworn to before me Date Associated Engineers, Inc. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 3311 E.SHELBY STREET,ONTARIO,CA 91764-4872 (909)980-1982 FAX(909)941-0891 - June 24, 2004 City of Fontana Redevelopment/Special Projects Dept. 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, CA 92335 Attention: Evelyne Ssenkoloto Subject: Contractual Services Agreement SP-46-01 South Highland Ave/Juniper Ave Sewer System Improvements Final Invoice for Withheld Retention Dear Evelyne: Enclosed please find our invoice number 46142A for $13,215.12. .This will be our final invoice on this project. This invoice is for the fee that was retained by the City of Fontana from billings submitted during the course of this project. If you have any questions, or need additional information, please call me at (909) 980-1982. Sincerely, ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS, INC. Thomas P. Manley Financial.Manager Job File: 01-020 PLANNING DESIGNING SURVEYING .• • • • . - ' 116495 , . . . . , • • . , - —1 • . . • • • • • • . .. . . • • . • • . • • • . . . • , • . • ' . Check No. - 116495 • Check Date - 01/15/04 • Stub 1 of 1 • • • . • - • RQST 11204 01/12/04 Z. Highland Juniper Ave Sewer 8,325.79 • • . . . . • . . • . . • • 8,325.79 • Payee: ' 40964 A.D. General Engineering 1: .., T-,,v,,,,,-•.,,,,,,,. ..,,q.--..,,,,,,-••;77,7,7%-77..f,,f.7.73-:47,',7377.:F.,7;.,.77.7.7.!•NAZ3,-,,,;,,,V.,•A,4.4'2,E•1•Rk*s4$, : "F','-'4Z-f-'''1,S$4.1,:f41.1-:'•ig'I,,-,;01.-: :-,A , •:,(. .:::::,:,,,,;-::116,,--4----.,.9 ,,,:-•,:.,:.• ..-:J;.,•:?.,•,,,i,*.-5...e1-4,kmivi.,,,N.. .:k,,,;k;i0q,,,, 4 -.,...f•51,,-.4.. .,*•:,•. .,,. J. :....,:,.. ,,,.?,,. .. :,:,1..i:::: :;, ,,,.„4!,,,k,;: 3:1:4:;.-,,,,-.4,,,,•,,,,,,,.tz,_. .,•]p'.:,,,,,,'„:15,,f,,.,:•4:,.?..,., •17.:.,.!-A,,-.(5 ,•*.T., ,i-,.....:7.,..g.•;- '....,•• ••,•••,-,-',,...--..,,'.,,.;..."qi,-,,,,•,•,.,3g.-„,. .,:„•,,,,,: , ..!..-.., ....-u.'•:),Itit,-•,:arygofifP,NTAN-',. .I.i:;.;]f.,I.-q,:..?Eoj.!':,g..s' .. ..•;: •Fi''i.r...',.' '-'':; ' i ..I' .ii..IIA. . . •,.g• . ..,igit•'t•.r.?k"',:•O-„k•;',.i'' '.;,99;,.' ' 4•..,:,..,7:,,,.i':;,:Zif.;'sd,-;,-,:;: b6.t'-6§ititt4A':;AV_;5...,' ,y, „,i',''::,„g„'4--',_tiiz-.,-:f4;-',,';'.'',,,,,'':';,:ii.9.,g'g-,, -.§.f.ilr'.,: - -Z'.':-:'A-Q;'tIE:;R '51.:RiAi,'4::::',,,gi;:0i:i:.:i.;,:1'qi;'',':',.,; :',:jqi-;',,,.':''ll.:'.,':''',.:','',....:s'-':',:'',i':y:::a:'i::',,;g-Rgg'5.::M.3 kjttti.4;iik-otAtaitu.ti,pirtk4o...;90py9;. ,p',.mdf:N ..,k,i4,.,N,-,'.,:, I•..t.,;.-,..e.,,ri,m,.:..;:..,:,:,,,,,,:.s%-c:c,vz..7:..: ,:f;,.':v,::!;::„:is,.,g..:,-iny,:::.p.-:,..o;.;:::;,i.,,,,:,..1::.::g.,.,--2;,-...1, -,,:,,,,,,-,,,,,,,7:.y.:,:•:,:,-:-i,.::.:.::. 2.,-,.,i:..,,,,. :,..:-.,,4'.::.,,.,,..,: :::::,-2:-.::,,,,,-,j.,,...:.:.-.,,.., ..,..,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,",,,,, ,,,,,,4,.--,,Ffikzi:,. ..i-a-4- ,..Q,:,,...!.,-,..,,,,,„,,zq.:,w,:- .,,:e,:,,i,,::?,..7.6..,7--.:,,i,,,.:-.,. ..,: .%•:,,,.a;-.,,..-.!: .,...,.c1, ..c,: -.-::-",,.,: ..T:12._. -.:: .--,. .,;5:,.._.-..-1.-:i,..L:',Y.,_,:',----.,'2,','..',#:;-,:.-r'L'''':,:i""'•-'-f"--- A-'-';',. . .• k -4c44Ef•-.---3256,r7L9',...:-::‹,,-,--,-_,.:::i,,,- -..)i',1-k,i::61W-5,:.i.'•.:;::;:ki,...i, -.4-ri.?-„K:,, ,,,:,:k.,.t.x,5.•,,,Ikty.,;1,...i!,.- .-.:'--.-•r.';.3...-!.,;.. ..,V•i•i :',.. .i.:; ,!',','-,Z4;,,Ir4!,..t•n's:',: e.:.,.":;.!•':•''...'...:•:--"..'"-"''..:-••••, - .: • '.'-••• iili.t.L.514?!4'1•;."ri-!7:!;•,:i•- •: ,,::;".=,,.,,...7;:,•,,<::: :?3y. .... r:.'''.••••'.,5;.,,.. - ,:,-.:••-y.g.,,oy,f.,.::-.:. •...::,.. -40"...,, ,,,,;.,:::,!,,,k.F..:1-. ...,1,7iy..,.. y....?,.,....i. -..'4".. ...-,..;%;',..• - .-, ,'..>...•-',, ,..• . ,•-• ,' , •-,:..-.,.-,:',,, ,..-•,,',. .:''.:'e,.':,--.j;:' ,"1;;.',i.'::''.,.'.4-c,''.':-2•,,'•,•,'.,..',.f:•5'.•;:,.••,-,,-• :.:',•:-rf",,,.,V.'..•.'•ii.,..,,•.;,,..,z,.,.,:;,..",-?;T.:;:„.i,. .::,::., ;7,z:M:::.i,-', .•:-.'..,;...:"'.'.. ..,—....-.,,, •‘,••• .:•:,. ....--'--2,'.,'....:7:!.--ff.'..n.':-: ,-.'-:`..'":-.i",i'ig''.:!-.';',..-;b',:i'-'-;:-.:,'4'..-':',.:,-,';'. .:.'";:.':.:•-''..'-:.:',/.::..-.':'."_-.':::-,-''-,',..:-;.'-i--.' ,'::'.::-'--;--2-'--. :.,.--.-.-;-„,..-,.•,,.-- ? .,'-• . ' -y-:-.?.-:-.i-.72,,,, -7,"",:',;,i.,5-:,.-;:..i.,-. N.,. .,'...';-;', g-4, 1,--`,:7,,;:.,t,m-51,- -ilf.:..,,v:w,:-..s,,,.a,„ ;?:Z4,- `.:-P',..-Tr---..,,'.,:1- -),:•-'-;,- ,-,..-D ,:,........r,....._ - - -, ".. ..,:.-:-..PiA:•-7:',A;.,5.'-'.-,,'•-•'::;;;:'-'.',,'..Y:,:.:; :- .4.,-. -.,-.4.44",,',:......k.:**-'*-...'*,.c.:: :-k. ?....5, -,-.-: :;.:..--.:-:..-;...,•:,-.-.:- EE ED •:',:'':":•-:-'-'.7.---7';'-'7:;,.,',- Y: 11-.'" il';:dfit.T:itliCil.TIFAN.L5:::::.T1-31, ,4p- -pTi. TWENTY -..„,,,..-„,,,,...,...•: ....7:,..,,,,,,,,..„-•,..-,-.,,,y.,,,,-,,,,,,,..,,,,,.,-,,..,,,,,,,,-,,,,,„:....:g,„,,,, ,,, ,.•,-,..,,,,-.•- „!„,,i,,:!)„-A's•.• ,--',,,,,,.siati:,• f;g,---.:,;••::-4.c.:.,--.,..,-,-,.-.'i,--:o.,:,•••:,, , ,.;.,;-:.,',,, ,.• ••.::-•:;,,,, :-,,:•,-;.',/::,i•'. , .,.,;,'.--.,-.,•-..,-•.-..,...,.-.,--,,c-..*:,'-'• .„...••• .... - -.. '••-• , ••.',, w:',,,,,.-.,•-. .,5•-•,:',•;: ,:.,',,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,•.,,,,--..,,44.:,. ,,,,,,..-..,... ..•, -.,-,-„,„,•,.t..,,:•,-,x.„,,,,,...,,,,,;F,,,,•,.•,-,x,•,-;.,]•!,,,,,„,,,4, ,...„,...,;,,,,,;„,„=„,.,,..„,„,,,..,.:,,„,,,,.,„,:,,,,,,,,.,,,,..,,,.,,,,,,,,,„„„.,,-..,.•„,„:,„,.,:,•,,,,,,,,•,,,..;:,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,T.,,.-„z,...•.,s,,,•,,,,,,,, -,,,,,.:•-,--..,...,,, . ."-",, ._. "....,,,,..„--,..,.,,..-.•:•.„,,, ,.,...,i,-,,,,,,,,,,.,•,...,,,,,,..-.-:,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,s-,--,:,,,,,7,..,,,„,•,:,.,.•,,,,..,;•,,,,:,•:•,-,:',:..,.4,,,,,,,,,,,-.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,-,:, . :-.,;',...7::--..7.j..,...•.:.,'•.'.. ,:v-:-:e...,-..:-;:,1,;z•-•°.-5r.::',.(g:'..:-.!•;:c7-:: T3',-.T;aL.,J::T,-...:•;.-:.:,na.,,.,,'•-•.,,'.:-•::', .:'.-; '.-',.•,'.. ••-..-::,,-.r,, --,:,-. . .:-. J• . .....„;77:i..,::-„,-- .-----, -------:"--------------------' - :,--,,,—,',.'",,,,..,-,,,,,:,,,,,,, ,,'=,,,, ,,,3,,,--z5i-,,,,,,,,.;:r6, •,,,, 5,,,,•.••:,--.••,•:.-;r•-:,::v.,;:ski•••,--:',,:::. -..,, ---- .,-.',,,,:„..,.- • .• • , -,---,,..•..'-.• : . :,,••,,.,,.,,...,..;;,-.:•,:,••-•:::::,...•••,;,,..,-,•.„,„4,y,,,A,...,,.,..,•,..,,,,,,,.,...,,.-.2.,•,-L,i.,,,,,•:,..,.,„,.: -:,:v.•,.-.,,,,,..n•,.-..•.,...,....,,....., . . . . . . .... -.,;,..,,,•-•.-.,:,,,,, ,......,-...i, ,,iiie,,,, ,:,.... .AI.1:DIL': GOriqt4,'...: P.--g ....1:- .. g '7:..;'•-,,.''." --,•.,,',. .: '''.'...-. :::,..r'..''''/,:j4 ::;:'':::::.. ::'.:,':.:[;::::-1:*-„jaZY',):.;-'''. ".':-.:;.•- :!::-'-'(''.'..'-',',.:',':''''-'-''''..-: '::•.: ,,,, r,.. ... g! e ofdi• -•-:,, 2"82-:9,-:::?N',:.'-'..:• ',en94 ,,.:... ..,.,.,:.., .... '-;•,.';''i'-';'":'''-,Bi:litlatik.::.,CA:,',1..191: 04,,,..,.,:,,:,,,,, ..,....:,.,...,,,;... ..,.BANK OF AMERICA•Fontana,California ..',.:':1...':'1,',,,VOID AFTER,90 DAYSt . . . .., . • . . . ,....... CITY OF FONTANA REDEVELOPMENT&SPECIAL PROJECTS DEPT A D General Engineering So.Highland-Juniper-Walnut Payments and Adjustments: P.O 03-69001 Pentamation Account: 95207-8527 JDE Account: 9309207702.6650.5 Analyzed by:ECS Payments to Paid into Due into Total Assoc+ Invoice Date Invoice# Check# Description Original Changes Invoice Amount Assoc Retention Retention Retention pmt P.O.Balance Original Contract $ 518,149.50 $ 518,149.50 7/29/2002 2 101314 Invoice $ 145,568.00 $ 131,011.20 $ 14,556.80 $ - $ 145,568.00 $ 372,581.50 7/30/2002 1 100925 Invoice $ 127,287.75 $ 114,558.98 $ 12,728.78 $ - $ 127,287.75 $ 245,293.75 10/21/2002 3 103042 Invoice. $ 219,799.01 $ 219,799.01 $ - $ - $ 219,799.01 $ 25,494.74 3/28/2003 4 Invoice $ 14,857.61 $ 13,371,85 $ 1,485.76 $ - $ 14,857.61 $ 10,637.13 11/3/2003 114976 Partial ret.Release-Ayala - $ 5,595.70 $ (5,595.70) $ - $ 10,637.13 12/16/2003 115918 ret.bal Release(+Olson) - $ 23,175.64 $ (23,175.64) $ $ - $ 10,637.13 1/15/2004 4 116495 Change Order#4-EOD 8,325.79 $ 8,325.79 $ - $ - $ 8,325.79 $ 2,311.34 1/15/2004 END OF DISPUTE $ 518,149.50 $ - $ 515,838.16 $ 515,838.16 $ (0.00) $ 1/15/2004 ecs A.D.General Analysis 010904.So Highland Juniper Walnut AnalysisBBB.xls 1of1 • change Order No. 4 - Revised Client Name: City of Fontana . Job Name: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements Job Number: SP-46-02 P.O./W.O.. No.: 03-6P001 Pay Period: Final Prepared by: George Harvilla Date Prepared: July 25,2003 Change Bid Revised Original In Unit Net Contract Working Item Description Quantity Quantity Quantity Unit Price Change Days 1 Clearing and Grubbing, and Mobilization 1 1 - LS $ 10,000.00 $ _ 2 Traffic Control, Signing and Striping 1 1 LS $ 10,000.00 $ 3 10" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer(C700) 4,515 4,515 - LF $ 52.00 $ - 4 8" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer(C7W) 254 254 - LF $ 55.00 $ - 5 10" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer(C1208) 142 142 - LF $ 70.00 $ - 6 8" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe 63 63 - LF $ 65.00 $ - 7 4" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer Lateral per - LF $ 50.00 $ City of Fontana Std. Detail No. 125 80 80 8 6" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay. Pipe Sewer Lateral per LF $ 50.00 $ - City of Fontana Std. Detail No. 125 249 249 ' 9 8" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer Lateral per - LF $ 50.00 $ - City of Fontana Std. Detail No. 125 35 35 10 -Sewer Manhole per City of Fontana Std.Detail No. - 112, Modified to 5' Diameter Manhole 4 4 EA $ 6,500.00 $ 11 Sewer Manhole per City of Fontana Std. Detail No. - _ 112, Modified to 4' Diameter Manhole 11 11 EA $ 3,800.00 $ Connection to Existing Sewer Manhole at Walnut& 12 Cypress inclding Manhole Base Reconstruction and - EA $ 1,700.00 $ - Related Work 1 1 - 13 Remove existing asphalt 9,774 9,774 - SF $ 0.10 $ 14 Asphalt Concrete Pavement 1,300 1,300 - TONS $ 37.00 $ - - Page 1 of 2 Change 3id Revised Original In Unit Net Contract . Working Item Description Quantity Quantity Quantity Unit Price Change Days Construct Microtunneling, complete with 36" steel 15 casing,jacking pits, receiving pit, redwood skids, etc_ 140 140 - LF Negotiated all per details. Construct Microtunneling, complete with 18"steel 16 casing,jacking pits, receiving pit, redwood skids, etc. - LF $ 260.00 $ 25 25 all per details. 63.0 63.0 - EA $ 25.00 $ - 17 Potholing existing utilities $ 42,150.00 $ - 74 1 18 Install asphalt overlay(added by C.O.#1) 1 - LSS - 19 Asphalt Concrete Pavement 745 - TO $ 41.00 $Negotiated $ 8,325.79 20 Claim Settlement(May 28, 2003 letter from City to A.D. General) TOTAL ADJUSTMENT TO CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 8,325.79 I I PROJECT SUMMARY: 2.46 TOTAL AMOUNT OF CONTRACT: (thru C.O. #3): $ 7,$ 507,5512.46 TOTAL ADJUSTMENT TO CONTRACT AMOUNT (CD. #4): $ 518,325.79 REVISED CONTRACT TOTAL AMOUNT: TOTAL NUMBER OF DAYS TO COMPLETE THE WORK(thru C.O.#4): 69 Working days TOTAL ADJUSTMENT TO TIME TO COMPLETE: 0 Working days REVISED CONTRACT TIME TO COMPLETE: 69 Working days . REVISED COMPLETION DATE: 14-Oct-02 NOTES: 1 Change Order No.1 added AC Overlay,Bid Item 18. 2 Change Order No.2 changed the quantities in bid items 3,4,5,6,8,10,11,13,15,&17,deleted bid item 14,added bid item 19, and added 24 working days to the time to complete the project due to delays caused by underground utility interferences. 3 Change Order No.3 modified Ayala Boring Quantities,Cost as negotiated 4 Change Order No.4 added Item 20 Prepared by: Date: 7/7-5/1)3 (Parsons Brinckerhoff) Approved by Date: g-- -/ (A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc.) Approved by: _, Date: ? a3 (City of Fontana) Page 2 of 2 ,. Harvilla, George From: Evelyne Ssenkoloto [essenkoloto@fontana.org] Sent: Tuesday,January 13, 2004 1:19 PM • To: 'Kevin K. Randolph'; Evelyne Ssenkoloto Subject: RE:A.D. General Status - Settlement Agreement/Change Order 4 Sent. . . FEDEX Tracking #837748750577 Next business morning 01/14/04 Original Message From: Kevin K. Randolph [mailto:Kevin.Randolph@bbklaw.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 1:08 PM To: Evelyne Ssenkoloto Subject: RE: A.D. General Status - Settlement Agreement/Change Order 4 Evelyne, please FedEx the check to me and I will get it to AD General by Thursday. • Original Message From: Evelyne Ssenkoloto [mailto:essenkoloto@fontana.org] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 12:57 PM To: Kevin K. Randolph; Evelyne Ssenkoloto Cc: Ray Bragg; 'Harvilla, George' Subject: A.D. General Status - Settlement Agreement/Change Order 4 Kevin, I have the AD General check here with me. Call or email me to let me Know as to whether I should mail/ FedEx/ or hold until I see you at the State of the City - Thursday. Settlement Agreement/Change Order 4 $8,325.79 Thanks- Evelyne C. Ssenkoloto Adm. Project Coordinator City of Fontana Redevelopment & Special Projects (909) 350 - 6792 **************************************************************************** ******* This email and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or otherwise confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, or believe that you may have received this communication in error, please advise the sender via reply email and delete the email you received. **************************************************************************** ******* 1 • 115918 Check No. - 115918 Check Date 12/15/03 Stub 1 of 1 RQST 121503 12/15/03 Release of Retention 23,175.64 • • 23,175.64 Payee: 1016 A.D. General Engineering ,s ssi22o 115 918 CITY OF FONTA.NA 8353 SIERRA AVENUE' 00115918 FONTANA,CALIFORNIA 92335 3598,; c sum=o-f TWENTY THREE THOUSAND ONEe HUNDRED SEVENTY 'FIVE AND 64/10 0********************** S To,.the A D. •General Engineering'',Order C012S.tructiOF1 TI1C,` _ of 282.9�N -GTenoaks Blvd. ti Ste 106/101y B rbank CA,. 91504 BANK OF AMERICA Fontana California VOID AFTER 90 DAYS.. ■ ■ LI: ■ I II 1 �■�II L L5 9 �8 L22 06 02 2 802 i 00 644 49 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS INDIAN WELLS LAWYERS SAN DIEGO (760) 568-261 I 3750 UNIVERSITY AVENUE (6 1 9) 525-1300 POST OFFICE BOX 1028 ONTARIO RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502-1028 ORANGE COUNTY (909)989-8584 (909) 686-1450 (949) 263-2600 (909) 686-3083 FAX SACRAMENTO BBKLAW.COM (916) 325-4000 KEVIN K. RANDOLPH KKRANDOLPH@BBKLAW.COM November 17, 2003 M 2003 RECUV EIV D VIA UPS OVERNIGHT MAIL 0 RE©EVELOpMENT� Stanley Haren Robins Kaplan Miller&Ciresi LLP 2049 Century Park East Suite 3700 Los Angeles, CA 90067-3211 Re: Fontana/A.D. General Engineering Dear Mr. Haren: I have enclosed a check in the amount of $5,595.70 from the City of Fontana representing settlement of the above matter. Sincerely, Ke in K. R.• do .h of BEST B` &KRIE ' R LLP KKR/tjo Enclosure cc: Kenneth R. Hunt, City Manager Ray Bragg,Redevelopment Director RVPUB\KKR\662965 114976 • • Check No. - 114976 Check Date - 11/06/03 Stub 1 of 1 RQST 110303 11/03/03 Partial Retention:Release 5,595.70 • 5,595.70 Payee: 40964 A.D. General Engineering ,s66„22� 14976 CITY OF FOIUTANA 8353 S(ERRA AVENUE; 001'14976 . 4 `FONTANA,CALIFORNIA 92335 3598 °' ;� 40964 11/06/03 **** 5,595 70 ; *:F�''*'if Pap ,� FINE THOUSAND FT=VE HUNDRED',NINETY FIVE AND 70/`1:00 5nmiof, :- 1 v a To.the A D. AGenerl En sneer ' J ing -- of 2829 5N _ Glenoaks ,Blvd• , .Ste �� VO(D Burbank CA 915 0,4 BANK OF AMERICQ Fontana California AFTER 90"DAYS; l' L4976ii' ': L2200066LI: 024421.180249111. L 1 r Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday,June 05, 2003 4:34 PM To: Curt Ingraham (curti@assoc-eng.com) ) Cc: Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org); Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org);Tom Holliman (tholliman@boyleengineering.com); 'Rsandoval@fontana.org; 'Yousuf Patanwala' Subject: A. D. General Accepts City Offer Curt, A.D. General has accepted the City's offer to settle the outstanding claims for the amount of $8,325.79. I will fax you a copy of their letter of acceptance. In the letter,they say they want to discuss the one-year warranty. In a previous e-mail to me, Scott raised the issue about when the warranty actually starts. He said that due to the delays in settling the claims,the warranty period should be retroactive to an earlier(unspecified) date. In the Green Book, Section 9-3.1, it says,'Warranty periods shall not be affected by any payment, but shall commence on the date equipment or material is placed into service at the direction of the Agency. In the event such items are not placed into service prior to partial or final acceptance of the project, warranty periods will commence on the date of such acceptance." The sewer has not yet been placed into service. So,the way I interpret this,the warranty period would begin on June 17, 2003,when the Council is scheduled to accept the project. Do you know of any other sections in the specifications, Green Book, or other sources that address this issue? 1 This is what still needs to be done: I- Council accepts the project on June 17 and Notice of Completion is filed, day period begins for A.D. General to settle any Stop Notices'>4 SSf3 r,c;<^.t kit, i/ f '�.,+� 4 '"' ', , 135 ` associated issues Change Order No. 4 and A. D. General signs it. They also sign a general ' S e a- ')s "� waiver, including Civil Code 1542, per City Attorney's letter dated May 28, 2000. 2 'a -35 days after June 17 (July 22), issue Progress Payment No. 5,which includes Change Order No. 4, and the retention, minus any outstanding Stop Notices. C= /-/,,. 1--oK ,Xo Z;"c/k17/<4, (7 - ? ) - - z) - Release Payment Bond S/Gi f don I-�`' °"if4'p f ` `�" 4""A /\CAS-. ea..^,G?,11 1, , s() Please begin to prepare Change Order No. 4. This change order should include Ralph's overtime (split between Associated and A.D. General), as well as the settlement offer for the five claims. Curt/Tom, let me know if I've overlooked anything. Thanks, George • Contract Question Page 1 of 2 Harvilla, George From: Carla Purse! [cpursel@fontana.org] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 1:59 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: Contract Question George-- I know this doesn't involve me anymore, but here's my two cents,whether you want it or not! Yes I do, especially since in previous correspondence, we stated the 150 & 125%. This may lead to Scott saying that we confused him and give him grounds for whatever bizarre action he may take next. I thought Yousuf wanted to make sure that we got an okay from the attorney saying we could release the money, even though the bonding company said not to since they are the ones who will ultimately be liable for what is not paid for by Scott. Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 9:46 AM To: Carla Pursel Subject: RE: Contract Question No, Ray didn't tell me to pursue it. But don't you think my two statements get to the crux of the matter? Original Message From: Carla Pursel [mailto:cpursel@fontana.org] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 6:23 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: Contract Question Am I suppose to be surprised???? 0 Did you ever get the legal opinion from Kevin? Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 2:34 PM To: cpursel@fontana.org Subject: FW: Contract Question I'm still confused. Original Message From: Yousuf Patanwala [mailto:ypatanwala@fontana.org] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 1:56 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: Contract Question George generally if you are withholding the cash amount from the payment due it is the amount equal to the amount of the Stop notice. If the contractor wants to bond around the stop notice, it is 125%of the Stop Notice amount. Please read Section 9-3 "Payment" in the Green Book. Yousuf Patanwala Principal Civil Engineer/Construction Section Community Development Department Engineering Division (909)350=6645 Original Message 10/30/2003 Contract Question Page 2 of 2 'v From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] ,4/ Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 1:35 PM To: Yousuf Patanwala Subject: Contract Question Yousuf, Below is my understanding of some of the legal issues which govern a construction contract. Please let me know if I have this right or wrong. - Per the PUBLIC CONTRACT CODE Section , the City retains 150 percent of the Stop Notice amount until it is released. -According to the CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE Section 3196, if a contractor provides the city with a bond in the amount of 125 percent of the Stop Notice amount,the city can release the retention for the amount of the Stop Notice. Is this correct and do you know the section of the Public Contract Code? I think part of the problem is that the 125 and 150 percentages are so similar it is causing confusion. I think there is also confusion between the two codes. Thanks! George 10/30/2003 Page 1 of 1 Harvilla, George From: Evelyne Ssenkoloto [essenkoloto@fontana.org] Sent: Thursday, October 30,2003 9:05 AM To: 'KKRandolph @ bbklaw.com' Cc: Ray Bragg Subject: A.D.General -Ayala Boring Hi Kevin; This is in response to A.D. General and Ayala Boring partial release of funds ($5,595.70) issue. The city normally doesn't issue joint checks. Is it possible for you to request A.D.General to provide a certified check payable to Ayala and then City will cut the check to A.D.General. Do we have that option.? Please let me know, so that I can have that check processed and mailed to your office possibly by close of business today. Thanks— Evelyne C. Ssenkoloto Admin. Project Coordinator City of Fontana Redevelopment/Special Projects (909)350-6792 10/30/2003 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP r OAPT\ A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS v INDIAN WELLS LAWYERS SAN DIEGO (760) 568-26 1 I 3750 UNIVERSITY AVENUE ( i 9) 525-1300 POST OFFICE BOX 1028 ONTARIO RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92502-1028 ORANGE COUNTY (909) 989-8584 (909) 686-1450 ()V V ji (949) 263-2600 (909) 686-3083 FAX SACRAMENTO BBKLAW.COM (9I 6) 325-4000 KEVIN K. RANDOLPH KKRANDOLPH@BBKLAW.COM October 7,2003 Stanley Haren,Esq. Robins, Kaplan,Miller& Ciresi LLP 2049 Century Park East Suite 3700 Los Angeles,CA 90067-3211 Re: City of Fontana Project ST-4602; South Highland Avenue and Juniper Avenue Sewer System Improvements A.D. General Engineering Construction Inc. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland Bond No. 8548601 Dear Mr. Haren: In response to your letter of October 6,2003,I spoke with City staff regarding your request. The City has agreed,in exchange for a full release,conditioned only upon delivery by the City of a joint check payable to A.D. General and Ayala Boring,that the City will release the sum of Five Thousand Five Hundred Ninety Six Dollars ($5,596) from the funds it holds as retention under the above-referenced contract documents. Please let me know how you would like to proceed further. Sin ly, Ke in K. R d h BEST BE T& GER LP KKR/tj o cc: Kenneth R. Hunt, City Manager Ray Bragg,Redevelopment Director Kirk S. MacDonald, Esq. Clark H. Alsop, City Attorney RVPUB\KKR\66076 I w Harvilla, George From: Yousuf Patanwala[ypatanwala@fontana.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 11:16 AM To: Evelyne Ssenkoloto; Harvilla, George Cc: Ray Bragg Subject: RE:AD General We can issue a check to A.D.General through City Attorney's Office. The city normally doesn't issue joint checks. The City Attorney's office should request A.D.General to provide certified check to Ayala and City cuts the check to A.D.General. That's my recommendation. Yousuf Patanwala Principal Civil Engineer/Construction Section Community Development Department Engineering Division (909)350-6645 Original Message From: Evelyne Ssenkoloto Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 4:31 PM To: 'gharvilla@pbworld.com' Cc: Yousuf Patanwala Subject: AD General George; Per email below, It appears Kevin's final stand is to have the check issued. Quote " We agreed that we would give them a partial release of the funds for Ayala Boring in exchange for a release from Ayala. Assuming that I get that release, can I ask that you get a joint check prepared, payable to Ayala and AD General?" Yousuf's last response to the October 7, letter(From BBK to Stanley Haren) was to wait until we got a go ahead from the lawyer (BBK) . So is this it??? We need to finalize this. Probably meet tomorrow and have this out of the way. Evelyne Original Message From: Ray Bragg Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 3:36 PM To: Evelyne Ssenkoloto Subject: FW: AD General Evelyne: Aren't we getting a check for Ayala Boring? Ray Raymond Bragg Redevelopment/Special Projects Director City of Fontana 909-350-7697 909-350-7676 (fax) 1 Original Message From: Kevin Randolph [mailto:KKRandolph@bbklaw.com] Sent:. Friday , -October 24,- 2003--11:01 AM - To: rbragg@fontana.org Subject: AD General I am getting calls from AD"s attys. We agreed that we would give them a partial release of the funds for Ayala Boring in exchange for a release from Ayala. Assuming that I get that release, can I ask that you get a joint check prepared, payable to Ayala and AD General? What would be a reasonable time? We will concurrently exchange the check for the release. Kevin K. Randolph, Esq. Best Best & Krieger LLP 3750 University Avenue Suite 400 Riverside, CA 92501 Phone: (909) 686-1450 Fax: (909) 686-3083 KKRandolph@bbklaw.com **************************************************************************** ******* This email and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or otherwise confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, or believe that you may have received this communication in error, please advise the sender via reply email and delete the email you received. **************************************************************************** ******* 2 Original Message From: Kevin Randolph jmailto:KKRandolph@bbklaw.coml Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 11:01 AM To: rbragq@fontana.orq Subject:AD General I am getting calls from AD"s attys. We agreed that we would give them a partial release of the funds for Ayala Boring in exchange for a release from Ayala. Assuming that I get that release, can I ask that you get a joint check prepared, payable to Ayala and AD General? What would be a reasonable time? We will concurrently exchange the check for the release. Kevin K. Randolph, Esq. Best Best& Krieger LLP 3750 University Avenue Suite 400 Riverside, CA 92501 Phone: (909) 686-1450 Fax: (909) 686-3083 KKRandolph@bbklaw.com Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 12:25 PM To: 'Evelyne Ssenkoloto' Cc: Yousuf Patanwala(ypatanwala@fontana.org); 'Ray Bragg' Subject: A.D. General Evelyne, I am OK with a joint check if Yousuf is. To the best of my knowledge,the Ayala Stop Notice is $5,595.70. The other remaining Stop Notice is Olson Precast for$19,660. George To: George Harvilla From: Evelyne Ssenkoloto Per email below, it appears Kevin's final stand is to have the check issued. Quote "We agreed that we would give them a partial release of the funds for Ayala Boring in exchange for a release from Ayala. Assuming that I get that release, can I ask that you get a joint check prepared, payable to Ayala and AD General?" Yousuf's last response to the October 7, letter(From BBK to Stanley Haren) was to wait until we got a go ahead from the lawyer(BBK). So is this it??? We need to finalize this. Probably meet tomorrow and have this out of the way. Evelyne Original Message From: Ray Bragg Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 3:36 PM To: Evelyne Ssenkoloto Subject: FW: AD General Evelyne: Aren't we getting a check for Ayala Boring? Ray Raymond Bragg Redevelopment/Special Projects Director City of Fontana 909-350-7697 909-350-7676 (fax) Status of A.D. General Contract Page 1 of 2 Harvilla, George From: Carla Pursel [cpursel@fontana.org] Sent: Wednesday, September 03,2003 4:08 PM To: Harvilla, George; Ray Bragg;Yousuf Patanwala Cc: Evelyne Ssenkoloto; Carla Pursel Subject: RE: Status of A.D. General Contract George- I have our A/P people running an audit to confirm the balance in the retention account for this project. If we go with the numbers that you have below,we will not be able to release ANY additional payment to A.D. General as all correspondence we have submitted to them has stated that we will withhold the amount of the Stop Notices at 150%. If we do withhold at 150%, the retention account will be short. We (Evelyne & I)will let you know what the exact amount is by tomorrow. cp Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 2:31 PM To: Ray Bragg; Yousuf Patanwala Cc: essenkoloto@fontana.org; Carla Pursel Subject: Status of A.D. General Contract Ray, Below is a summary of the financial status of the South Highland Sewer: Retained amount: $ 28,771.34 >to be confirmed by Evelyne/Carla • y 7-1"37)gry Outstanding Stop Notices: $25,255.70 >to be confirmed by Evelyne/Carla Difference/Amount which can be released* $3,515.64 Settlement Agreement/Change Order 4* $8,325.79 * In my opinion, the City is obligated to issue a check to A. D. General for$11,841.43 ($3,515.64+ $8,325.79). However, the letter from Attorney Stanley Haren dated July 30, 2003 requests that the City not make any payments to A. D. General without the written consent of Fidelity& Deposit Company of Maryland. Should we get Kevin Randolph's opinion on this? 9/4/2003 Status of A.D. General Contract Page 2 of 2 t Should this somehow be summarized and included in the response letter recently prepared? Yousuf, Carlos told me this morning you wanted an update, so this is where we are. George 9/4/2003 Status of A.D. General Contract Page 1 of 2 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 4:36 PM To: 'Evelyne Ssenkoloto' Subject: RE: Status of A.D. General Contract Now you can mail out the letter as well,cc me, please! Original Message From: Evelyne Ssenkoloto [mailto:essenkoloto@fontana.org] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 4:05 PM To: Ray Bragg; Harvilla, George Cc: Yousuf Patanwala Subject: RE: Status of A.D. General Contract FYI.. A copy of the signed Settlement Agreement&General Release has been mailed out certified to Mr. Scott Snyder at A.D. General. Evelyn" Original Message From: Ray Bragg Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 3:10 PM To: 'Harvilla, George' Cc: Yousuf Patanwala; Evelyne Ssenkoloto Subject: RE: Status of A.D. General Contract I do not believe we have a contractual agreement with Fidelity& Deposit Company of Maryland. Therefore, I do not think we are obligated in any way to honor their request. Sounds like we owe AD General a check for $11,841.43. Let the existing chronology letter deal with the issues raised in the July 31 St letter only. Ray Raymond Bragg Redevelopment/Special Projects Director City of Fontana 909-350-7697 909-350-7676 (fax) Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 2:31 PM To: Ray Bragg; Yousuf Patanwala Cc: essenkoloto@fontana.org; Carla Pursel Subject: Status of A.D. General Contract Ray, 9/4/2003 Status of A.D. General Contract Page 2 of 2 Below is a summary of the financial status of the South Highland Sewer: Retained amount: $28,771.34 >to be confirmed by Evelyne/Carla Outstanding Stop Notices: $ 25,255.70 >to be confirmed by Evelyne/Carla Difference/Amount which can be released* $3,515.64 Settlement Agreement/Change Order 4* $8,325.79 * In my opinion, the City is obligated to issue a check to A. D. General for$11,841.43 ($3,515.64+ $8,325.79). However,the letter from Attorney Stanley Haren dated July 30, 2003 requests that the City not make any payments to A. D. General without the written consent of Fidelity& Deposit Company of Maryland. Should we get Kevin Randolph's opinion on this? Should this somehow be summarized and included in the response letter recently prepared? Yousuf, Carlos told me this morning you wanted an update, so this is where we are. George 9/4/2003 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE between THE CITY OF FONTANA a California municipal corporation and A.D. GENERAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION, INC. a California corporation [Dated as of June 17, 2003 for reference purposes only] 1 ARTICLE 1. PARTIES AND EFFECTIVE DATE 1.1 Parties. This Settlement Agreement and General Release ("Agreement") is entered into by and between (i) the City of Fontana, a California municipal corporation("City") • and (ii) A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc., a California corporation ("A.D. General"). City and A.D. General are sometimes referred to herein individually as "Party" and collectively as "Parties." 1.2 Date of Reference. This Agreement is dated as of June 17, 2003 for reference purposes only. This Agreement shall not become effective until the "Effective Date" as defined in Section 1.3.1 1.3 Effective Date. This Agreement will not become effective until the date ("Effective Date") that this Agreement has been executed by the appropriate authorities of the City and A.D. General. ARTICLE 2.RECITALS 2.1 A.D. General and the City entered into that certain contract entitled "Construction of South Highland Avenue . and Juniper Avenue Sewer System Improvements " dated June 20, 2002 ("Contract")which, as more particularly described in the Contract, provided for A.D. General's installation of a sewer line on Walnut Street, Juniper Avenue, and South Highland Avenue("Project"). 2.2 A.D. General alleges, and the City denies, that the City is obligated to pay A.D. General no less than the sum of Thirteen Thousand One Hundred Ninety Four Dollars and Ninety Cents ($13,194.90) for alleged additional work performed pursuant to the Contract and for other damages incurred by A.D. General during the performance of the Contract. The foregoing allegation is hereinafter referred to as the "Dispute." 2.3 By execution of this Agreement, the City and A.D. General desire to settle, once and for all, any and all claims which A.D. General may have against the City arising under or related to the Contract, including, without implied limitation, the Dispute, whether such claims are known or unknown, foreseeable or unforeseeable, past, present or future. A.D. General acknowledges that it may have suffered costs, expenses or damages of which it is not aware, but that it nonetheless intends to effect a full and complete settlement of such known and unknown claims. For purposes of this Agreement, the term "Released Matters" includes the Dispute and any other past, present or future, known or unknown, claim, cause of action, demand or liability related to or any way arising from or related to the Contract. The term "Released Matters" does not include any breach of this Agreement. 'All further section, article, and exhibit references shall be to the sections, articles and exhibits of this Agreement unless otherwise noted. RVPUB\KKR\654069 Draft 6/13/03 2 ARTICLE 3. 3.1 No Effect Upon Contract. Other than for the matters described in Sections 3.2 and 3.3 of this Release, the conditions and provisions of this Release shall not be deemed or operate to amend, modify or abridge the Parties' respective rights and obligations under the Contract which, but for the matters expressly set forth herein, shall continue to be applicable and enforceable in accordance with its terms. 3.2 City's Obligations. 3.2.1 Settlement Payment. In consideration of A.D. General's general waiver and release of all claims as provided in Section 3.3, the City shall, within thirty (30) days following the Effective Date, pay to A.D. General the sum of Eight Thousand Three Hundred Twenty Five Dollars and Seventy Nine Cents ($8,325.79) ("Settlement Payment") as full and final payment for any and all claims which A.D. General may have against the City in connection with or related to the Contract and/or the Project and any work performed in connection therewith, whether such claims are known or unknown, foreseeable or unforeseeable, past,present,or future. 3.2.2 Retention Funds Release. Subject to the City Council's acceptance of the Project on June 17, 2003, and within thirty-five (35) days thereafter, the City shall release all or a part of the retention funds it holds pursuant to the Contract to A.D. General. The amount of retention funds actually released will be determined by the status of any and all stop notices filed against the Project as of the date the funds are to be released. The City shall release all retention funds to A.D. General, less any amounts required to satisfy any stop notices filed and not released prior to such payment. 3.3 Release. For and in consideration of the City's obligations under Section 3.2, A.D. General hereby releases, waives and discharges the City and its respective officers, officials, employees, agents, volunteers, contractors and attorneys from any and all alleged and actual claims, damages, remedies, causes of action, demands, and other liabilities (collectively, "Liabilities") arising out of or in any way related to the Released Matters. The foregoing release and waiver applies to all Liabilities,whether retrospective, current, or prospective, known or unknown, foreseeable or unforeseeable. 3.3.1 Civil Code Section 1524 Waiver. A.D. General acknowledges that it is familiar with the provisions of California Civil Code Section 1542,which provides "A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release,which if known by him must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor." RVPUB\KKR\654069 Draft 6/13/03 3 A.D. General acknowledges that it may have sustained damages, losses, costs or expenses that are presently unknown and unsuspected. Nevertheless, A.D. General acknowledges that this Agreement has been negotiated and agreed upon in light of this situation, and, to the extent of the release set forth in Section 3.3 hereby expressly waives all rights which it has under California Civil Code Section 1542 or any other statute or common law principle of similar effect. 3.3.2 Release Does Not Extend to Obligations Under this Agreement. The release provided in this Section 3.3.2 do not extend to breaches of the City's obligations arising under this Agreement. 3.4 Advice of Legal Counsel. Each of the Parties acknowledges that it is freely and voluntarily entering into this Agreement and that it has been afforded the opportunity to obtain the advice of legal counsel of its choice with regard to this Agreement. Each of the Parties further acknowledges that it understands this Agreement in its entirety. 3.5 No Admission. By entering into this Agreement, none of the Parties are admitting or acknowledging liability or responsibility for any of the other Parties to this Agreement or other Parties to the Dispute. 3.6 Authority to Sign. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Parties warrant and represent that they have full authority to sign and thereby bind their respective Parties to this Agreement and all respective heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns. 3.7 Integration; Counterparts. This Agreement is the entire agreement between the Parties concerningthe settlement of the Dispute and replaces anyprior p ep p r negotiation, discussions or agreements between the Parties. None of the Parties are relying upon any representation or agreements in connection with the Dispute. This Agreement may be executed in duplicate originals, each of which is deemed to be an original, but when taken together, shall constitute one and the same instrument. This is a fully integrated Agreement 3.8 Non-liability of City Officials/Employees. No board member, official, contractor, consultant, attorney or employee of the City shall be personally liable to A.D. General, or to their successors or assignees, in the event of any default or breach by the City, or for any amount which may become due to A.D. General or to their successors or assignees, or on any obligations arising under this Agreement. 3.9 Venue. Any legal action or proceeding concerning this Agreement shall be filed and prosecuted in the appropriate California state court in the County of San Bernardino, California. Each Party hereto irrevocably consents to the personal jurisdiction of that court. The City and A.D. General each hereby expressly waive the benefit of any provision of federal or RVPUB\KKR\654069 Draft 6/13/03 4 • state law or judicial decision providing for the filing, removal, or change of venue to any other court or jurisdiction, including, without implied limitation, federal district court, due to any diversity of citizenship between the City and A.D. General, due to the fact that the City is a party to such action or proceeding or due to the fact that a federal question or federal right is involved or alleged to be involved. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the City and A.D. General specifically waive any rights provided to them pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 394. A.D. General acknowledges that the provisions of this Section 3.9 are material consideration to the City for their entry into this Agreement, in that the City will avoid the potential cost, expense and inconvenience of litigating in a distant forum. 3.10 No Interpretation Against Drafter. The City and A.D. General acknowledge that this Agreement is the,product of mutual arms-length negotiation and drafting and that each Party has been represented by legal counsel in the negotiation and drafting of this Agreement. • Accordingly, the rule of construction which provides the ambiguities in a document shall be construed against the drafter of that document shall have no application to the interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement. In any action or proceeding to interpret or enforce this Agreement, the finder of fact may refer to such extrinsic evidence not in direct conflict with any specific provision of this Agreement to determine and give effect to the intention of the parties hereto. 3.11 Governing Law. This Release shall be interpreted in accordance with California statutes and decisional law,without regard to conflict of laws principles. 3.12 Amendment to this Agreement. Neither Party shall have the right to unilaterally terminate, modify or abridge any of their respective rights or obligations under this Agreement. Any amendment to this Agreement must be in writing executed by all Parties hereto. 3.13 No Waiver. Failure to insist on any one occasion upon strict compliance with any of the covenants or conditions hereof shall not be deemed a waiver of such term, covenant or condition, nor shall any waiver or relinquishment of any rights or powers hereunder at any one time or more times be deemed a waiver or relinquishment of such other right or power at any other time or times. 3.14 No Third Party Beneficiaries. The Parties acknowledge that there are no express or implied third party beneficiaries to this Agreement. No person or entity not a signatory hereto shall have any rights or causes of action against any Party hereto as a result of that Party's performance or nonperformance of any obligation hereunder. 3.15 Attorneys' Fees. In the event of the bringing of an arbitration, action or suit by a Party hereto against another Party hereunder by reason of any breach of any of the covenants or agreements or any intentional inaccuracies in any of the representations and warranties on the part of the other Party arising out of this Agreement or any other dispute between the Parties concerning this Agreement, then, in that event, the prevailing Party in such action or dispute, RVPUB\KKR\654069 Draft 6/13/03 5 whether by final judgment or arbitration award, shall be entitled to have and recover of and from the other Party all costs and expenses of suit or claim, including actual attorneys' fees. Any judgment, order or award entered in any final judgment or award shall contain a specific provision providing for the recovery of all costs and expenses of suit or claim, including actual attorneys' fees (collectively, "Costs") incurred in enforcing, perfecting and executing such judgment or award. For the purposes of this Section 3.15, Costs shall include, without implied limitation, attorneys' and experts' fees, costs and expenses incurred in the following: (i) post judgment motions and appeals, (ii) contempt proceedings, (iii) garnishment, levy and debtor and third party examination; (iv) discovery; and (v) bankruptcy litigation. This Section 3.15 shall survive any termination of this Agreement. 3.16 No Prior Assignments. A.D. General hereby represents and warrants to the other that they have not, prior to the date of this Agreement, assigned, transferred, pledged, hypothecated or conveyed any right or interest they may have in this Agreement to any person or entity not a signatory hereto. Neither Party has made any transfer, pledge, conveyance, assignment or hypothecation of any claim or chose in action(whether or not such claim or chose in action is the subject of this Agreement) which they may have or claim to have against the other Party. A.D. General shall each defend, indemnify and hold the other Parties harmless from and against all damages, costs, expenses, liabilities, penalties, forfeitures, judgments, attorneys' fees, expert witness fees, or amounts paid in settlement which are in any way related to or arise of that Party's breach of the foregoing representation and warranty. 3.17 Each Party to Bear Their Own Costs. Except as may be provided by Section 3.15, the City and A.D. General shall each bear their own respective legal expenses and costs incurred in the preparation and review of this Agreement. [Signatures on Following Pages] RVPUB\KKR\654069 Draft 6/13/03 6 SIGNATURE PAGE TO SETTLEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE "CITY" CITY OF FONTANA a California municipal corporation Dated: q/a/°3 By: K nne R. Hunt City Manager ATTEST: By: .1- ✓ /City Clerk APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: BEST BEST &KRIEGER LLP By: City Attorney RVPUB\KKR\654069 Draft 6/13/03 7 SIGNATURE PAGE TO SETTLEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE "A.D. GENERAL" • A.D. GENERAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION, INC., a California corporation Dated: ( By: Its: RVPUB\KKR\654069 Draft 6/13/03 • Han.ills, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 3:52 PM To: Evelyne Ssenkoloto (essenkoloto@fontana.org) Subject: California Codes Evelyne, Go to www.leginfo.ca.ciov, click on California Law,then put a check mark by the code you want, and it will display after you hit search. George CA Codes (civ:3196-3205) Page 1 of 3 / LaItfor„J CIVIL CODE SECTION 3196-3205 3196. if the original contractor or subcontractor disputes the correctness or validity or enforceability of any stop notice, the public entity may, in its discretion, permit the original contractor to file with the public entity a bond executed by a corporate surety, in an amount equal to 125 percent of the claim stated in the stop notice conditioned for the payment of any sum which the stop notice claimant may recover on the claim together with his costs of suit in the action, if he recovers therein. upon the filing of such bond with the public entity, the public entity shall not withhold any money or bonds (where bonds are to be issued in payment for the work of improvement) from the original contractor on account of the stop notice. The surety or sureties upon such bond shall be jointly and severally liable to the stop notice claimant with the surety or sureties upon any payment bond furnished pursuant to chapter 7 (commencing with section 3247) . 3197. If the original contractor asserts (1) that the claim upon which the stop notice is based is not included within the types or classifications of claims referred to in this article, or (2) that the claimant is not one of the persons named in section 3181, or (3) that the amount of the claim as specified in the stop notice is excessive, or (4) that there is no basis in law for the claim as referred to and set out in the stop notice, he may have the question determined in a summary proceedings in accordance with the provisions of sections 3198 to 3205, inclusive. 3198. The original contractor shall, serve upon the public entity an affidavit and a copy thereof alleging the legal grounds upon which he bases his claim and the facts in support thereof, and demanding the release of all or such portion of such money or bonds as is alleged to be withheld improperly or in an excessive amount. such affidavit shall also state the address of the original contractor within this state for the purpose of permittingservice b ,mail upon p p Y p him of any notice or legal document. 3199. The public entity shall serve upon the claimant, either personally or by registered or certified mail , addressed to the last known address of the claimant, a copy of the affidavit and the demand for release together with a written notice stating that the public entity will release such money or bonds, or such portion of either as has been demanded, unless the claimant files with the public entity a counteraffidavit on or before a time designated in the notice, which shall not be less than 10, nor more than 20 days, after service upon the claimant of the copy of such affidavit. Proof of service . shall be made by an affidavit. 3200. if the claimant desires to contest the original contractor's affidavit and demand for release, he shall , within the time allowed, serve upon the public entity a counteraffidavit alleging the details of his claim and shall also set forth in detail the specific basis upon which he contests or rebuts the allegations of the original contractor's affidavit, together with proof of service of a copy of http://www.Ieginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=civ&group=03001-0400... 9/4/2003 CA,Codes (civ:3196-3205) Page 2 of 3 / such counteraffidavit upon the original contractor. If no such counteraffidavit with proof of service is served upon the public entity within the time allowed, then the public entity shall forthwith release the money or bonds, or such portion thereof as has been demanded by such affidavit, without further notice to the claimant, and the public entity shall not be liable in any manner for making such release. The public entity shall not be responsible for the validity of the affidavit or counteraffidavit. 3201. if such counteraffidavit, together with proof of service, is so filed, either the original contractor or the claimant may file an action in the appropriate superior court for a declaration of the respective rights of the parties. After the filing of such action, either the original contractor or the claimant shall be entitled to a hearing by the court for the purpose of determining his rights under the affidavit and demand for release and the counteraffidavit. such hearing must be granted by the court within 15 days from the date of making of such motion, unless continued by the court for good cause. The party making the motion for hearing must give not less than five days' notice in writing of such hearing to the public entity and to the other party. 3202. At such hearing, the original contractor shall have the burden of proof. The affidavit and counteraffidavit shall be filed with the court by the public entity and they shall constitute the pleadings, subject to the power of the court to permit an amendment in the interest of justice. The affidavit of the original contractor shall be deemed controverted by the counteraffidavit, and both shall be received in evidence. 3203. No findings shall be required in a summary proceeding under this article. when the hearing is before the court sitting without a jury and no evidence other than the affidavit and counteraffidavit is offered, if the court is satisfied that sufficient facts are shown thereby, it may make its determination thereon; otherwise, it shall order the hearing continued for the production of other evidence, oral or documentary, or the filing of other affidavits and counteraffidavits. At the conclusion of the hearing, the court shall make and enter its order determining whether the demand for release shall be allowed or not, which order shall be determinative as. to the right of the claimant to have the money or bonds further withheld by the public entity. The original contractor shall serve a copy of such order on the public entity. 3204. Nothing contained in this article shall be construed to deprive any party of the right to a trial by jury in any case where such right is given by the California constitution, but a jury trial may be waived in like manner as in the trial of an action. 3205. No determination in the summary proceedings under this article shall be res judicata with respect to any right of action by the claimant against either principal or surety on any labor and material bond or with respect to any right of action against any party personally liable to the claimant. http://www.Ieginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=civ&group=03001-0400... 9/4/2003 /� i .,, ;-- - '.."-!;-;...W."-. CI9*(WPC*Cto aV . : WORK §3196 . WORKS OF i '' mOT'ICI FOR PIPI.IC } . • :.,fall'.-:_i cv#=irtstallrnent due-is was superior to claim inst the contra• µz' '•'! ": 96 Surety bond; amount; fi�' liability of sureties z la O p notice served of any attaching creditor of subs ° } ;"`"" , I -.6:.'„ at. F '`'', ` 'the on gal- contractor or subcontractor disputes the correctness or ;;.,Z# ci - Fairbanks v. Southern California Glee. Co, v. i, :,-. • • ;` b'i .:j' ` `Co, (1930) 291 P. 173 P. 760, 178 C, 386. Grant;.-':*w:::::.:;---. public entitymay, in its :,° � _.- ; • clity m enforceability of any stop notice, the y denied 292 P.529, _; + ;..": q: a -"::- -. .•-` . r+.tion, permit the original contractor to file with the public entity a bond ' 4. Federal tax liens -,.,..-. �,?..::--.�; ��<�?,� . . uted bya corporate surety, in an amount equal to 125 percent of the when(NI due install- `'-''. : :'-_. p ty �`ltis section V�.n a st �"r`���- �•. :�?� .. ontractor's assign- funds due contractor under public vertigo 3 x`:'';''•.'<,..". ? xn stated in the stop notice conditioned for the payment of any suiii which en subsequent re- tract priority over an ass nment E,y.: =a=L .: ::;.::-- '' .-`t-op notice claimant may recover-on the claim together with his costs of tests. Fairbanks v, tractor did not preclude attaclmentol'f `Y;; - 5 '' : Co, (1930) 291 P. Bens for contractor'sun aid fede Y,, ��- file d ' he recovers therein. Upon the filing of such band with Y;-_, hn denied 292 P.529, come tax to amounts due under iiblic� :��`':. •`.;=::-, � c-public entity, the public entity shall not withhold any money or bonds contract on tlteort- that pa rnents due de ;- d`�:k' :a, .:•:'''' -..-ere bonds are to be issued in payment for the work of improvement)from _' js ah d- i furnished labor ing contractor became a trust fund fcra''.,v . . .',-,-,'-`' - .' .,,:_.;_.- <: ;=,griginal contractor on account of the stopnotice. The surety or sureties toter sallme on payment of laborers ractor and materiaimed`:;, ro_ ;..; ;.: bond shall be jointly and severa115 liable to the stop notice -' final installment of therefore, contractor had no interest" ::- '::.,. .•.: •`.. � - ptesl by its notice funds. r�meric.�n Fidelity Fire Ins, co,:ur� :::<: - 5.'mans with the surety or sureties upon any payment bond ft.�rnished ,,,CD vithhold payment, (D.C,1974)385 F,Supp. 1075. • { --°- • stunt to chapter 7 (commencing with Section 3247). °r" •' : 4 ti by Stotts.1969, c, 1362, p. 2773, § 2, operative Jan. 1, 1971.) €r`1 'Pealed by Stats.1963, c, 819, p. 1997, § 2, efft.-J it"t":` - ''4 Witi- .xv;_ - _< Historical and Statutory Notes '; ,: -r mer § 3196, added by Stats.1917, c, 751, Stats.19d3, c. 1176, p: 26T1, § I; Stats:1963, c, i Historical and StatutoryNotes :° -. `-` - `:t:-relating to gotiable instruments, tivas 1786,p. 3578, § 7; Stats.1967, c. 891, p. 2337, �',„ {F -,:,�.. . ,..;.• .. Sys` , ;.. - ,sled by Stats.1963, c. 819, § 2, off.Jan. 1, § 1; Stats.1968, c: 1298,p.2445, § 1,operative :r. t d by Stats.1917,c. Former§§ 3194, - Ip; Similar revisions were enacted by ,Ian. 1, 1970. `j 3195,enacted 1872,Yei :;' ." p i. ' able instruments. to acceptance of a bill of exc.h a w;+-E.,,t':• ' ' „.K 963r c. 819, in Com.C. § 3511, " �� . ted byStats.19b3, by sv;.: :r- C.C:P. former § 1184d,added by Stats.1925, :<�#; pealed Stats.1917,c»751, § 1 ;Y.<;.•.. o' er§ 3196,enacted 1872, relatingto ac• h3F,< :rr,.: :3 c. 308,p. 5©7, § 1, amended by Stets 1931, c. ..t.,;; :g s, :nce of a bill of exchange,was repealed by 17Y#,§ " '':,.; I.Nas amended by -E, -'" 7r`: `1917,c. 751,§ 1. 830,p. 2. j:; *.: - r. ".:i31. VFitt4II: C.C.P.former§§ 1191.1, 1192.1 G.C.P, formes § 1i84e, added 15y 5tats 1943, ;,. tie , F Es:. µ .. .:est b 5tats:l9SY, c. 1159, p. 2948, § 1, c. 139,c: 1035, § 1, amenderi try Stets 1949, c. :.= • y c. 945, 1830 '-',AP! _ :zs€ ;�-dui by Stats.1955, p. § 1; 47t;, p: 824, § 1. ;� , ;. - -- Cross References :NI' :LEASE OF STOP NOTICE • z- ::j -AT, `..f. i -_..r previsions relating to bonds, see§ 3225 et seq. '' `_' _ _:t: r, final contractor,see§ 3095. - i. '° ;"s1 - 's ent bond, see§ 3096. , ` �; • .}. �. see § 3247 et set �-:.:. ,�M`�;€r. `�.�at�g](tE band for public works, i. z ;ml,• filing; liability of sureties. . `.';: ;�: a entity,see§3099- i :=;ems Q T==tits,I-I .ate. - •`entice,see 5 3103, r,: Z .nd for release of funds by original contractor. :.:r '.':.:;• �r o ` y:5--'••: - Code of Regulations References "` ''- ,_€_ and demand upon claimant; counteraffidavit: '?.i;.--.: ..- •: n. ::, La. rice upon legal entity; release of fund... ,. .`" - _ � �.- --•��,.:°':�:�; <r-on€1 to release money withheld or, claims, o .on of rights; hearing, notice. -"T ':'7,` i g 'r�`:11 Cal,Code of Re s. tj§ 57,12, 78.5. evidence. :; ;:: • ,� ' _ yA �'=- - '�. Law Review Commentaries 4'<. - ->-�;'• r betties liens and related remedies. Rod- - ourt; effect. --- :`- ..1T.. ;toss(1968) 43 S.Bar J. 930. lit .•- ; -, .- Library References • •,a.,- .tea 's-::�r': ed Stats,1$69, c. 1362, p, 2773 § 2 operate -- •ties 22, 129. "s`"lli, �...,:; y C J S»Co>utties 41, 42,1b9. flal s.kr - : `' •eipai Corporations c 369, G.J.S.Municipal Corporations § 1186. 1[ -4.. " _°: :.tc.: �. �i�__ nn1/. -- ... - o,. .... .. .nn - :.':'+.,till#' /,.THE_ �, 3 Cityof Fontana a = CALIFORNIA it ` o0'�1r ��-;}/li�3 _.tom;::, � \�Nt' 04 September 3, 2003 A CAL Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 Subject: South Highland Ave. Sewer Improvements Dear Mr. Snyder, This letter is in response to your letter to me dated July 31, 2003. In your letter, you requested two things. First, you requested that the City intervene into a dispute between you and one of your Subcontractors. Second, you requested that the City consider your bonding company's attorney's suggestion (July 17, 2003 letter by Laura Nash) of a two-party check to A.D. General and Olson Precast. Finally your letter suggests that the City has ignored your bonding company's findings. First, the City does not wish to intervene in a dispute between A.D. General and subcontractor Olson Precast. The City has no contractual arrangements with Olson Precast and therefore has no legal standing in your dispute. Second, the City of Fontana has declined to issue a joint check as requested by your bonding company's attorney, Laura Nash. (Letter dated July 17, 2003). The City can only release A. D. General's retention provided A. D. General provides a Stop Notice Bond for 125% of the Stop Notice amount per Public Contract Code Section 3196. This was stated in the City's July 14, 2003 letter to Ms. Laura Nash of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, LLP, and copied to A. D. General. The relationship between the City and A.D. General is governed in this instance by the Settlement Agreement between them dated June 17, 2003. The City will pay the balance of the retention funds owed to A.D. General in accordance with the Settlement Agreement. Finally, the City's representative has not ignored any information provided to him, and has, instead, provided alternatives to resolve these Stop Notice issues. The chronology below shows the correspondence relating to the A. D. General/Olson Precast situation. May 28, 2003 City Attorney (Best, Best, and Krieger) submitted a letter to offer a settlement to A.D, General Engineering regarding their outstanding claims. www.fontana.org 8353 SIERRA AVENUE FONTANA, CALIFORNIA 92335-3528 (909) 350-7600 September 2, 2003 A.D. General South Highland Ave. Sewer Improvements Page 2 - June 4, 2003 A.D. General submitted letter of acceptance for settlement of outstanding claims to the City Attorney (Best, Best, and Krieger) in the amount of $8,325.79 and requested additional discussion regarding the one year warranty. July 7, 2003 City received letter from Laura Nash, of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi; bonding counsel for A.D. General Engineering's bonding company. The letter requested that the City release partial payment to Olson Precast in the amount of$5,586.19, in exchange for a partial release of the stop notice filed by Olson Precast. July 14, 2003 City responded to Ms. Nash stating that the City's contractual arrangement is with A.D. General. The City does not make direct payment to subcontractors. July 15, 2003 City (Attn: Bragg, Harvilla, and Purse!) received a letter from A.D. General Engineering requesting release of retention, and referenced request from bonding company's attorney stating the stop notice from Olson Precast is invalid. A.D. General also stated that if payment was not received by date requested, steps towards compensation and damages will be sought after. July 17, 2003 City received a letter from Laura Nash, of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi; bonding company's attorney. Letter requested the City to investigate the possibility of releasing a two-party check to Olson Precast and A.D. General Engineering, in the amount of $5,586.19 to ensure payment to Olson Precast and further stating A.D. General Engineering was unable to make direct payment to Olson Precast due to limited cash flow. July 30, 2003 City sends letter to Laura Nash, of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi. Letter notifies Ms. Nash that the City has declined her request to issue a two-party check payable to A.D. General Engineering and Olson Precast. July 30, 2003 City received letter from Stanley Haren, of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi; requesting that the City withhold all funding to A. D. General Engineering, stating A.D. General Engineering does not have the financial capacity to pay their subcontractors in a timely manner, thus exposing the bonding company to possible liability. July 31, 2003 City received letter from A.D. General Engineering requesting the City look into the ,dispute between A.D. General Engineering and Olson Precast, reiterating their opinion that the stop notice filed by Olson Precast is invalid. Respectfully, R VELOPMENT AND SPECIAL PROJECTS DEPARTMENT Raymon Bragg Director 4/ c: Yousuf Patanwala,City of Fontana Curt Ingraham,Associated Engineers George Harvilla, Parsons Brinckerhoff Laura Nash,Attorney Stanley Haren,Attorney September 3, 2003 Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 Subject: South Highland Ave. Sewer Improvements Dear Mr. Snyder, This letter is in response to your letter to me dated July 31, 2003. In your letter, you requested two things. First, you requested that the City intervene into a dispute between you and one of your Subcontractors. Second, you requested that the City consider your bonding company's attorney's suggestion (July 17, 2003 letter by Laura Nash) of a two-party check to A.D. General and Olson Precast. Finally your letter suggests that the City has ignored your bonding company's findings. First, the City does not wish to intervene in a dispute between A.D. General and subcontractor Olson Precast. The City has no contractual arrangements with Olson Precast and therefore has no legal standing in your dispute. Second, the City of Fontana has declined to issue a joint check as requested by your bonding I company's attorney, Laura Nash (Letter dated July 17, 2003). The City can only release A. D. General's retention- provided A. D. General provides a Stop Notice Bond for 125% of the Stop Notice amount per Public Contract Code Section 3196. This was stated in the City's July 14, 2003 letter to Ms. Laura Nash of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, LLP, and copied to A. D. General. The relationship between the City and A.D. General is governed in this instance by the Settlement Agreement between them dated June 17, 2003. The City will pay the balance of the retention funds owed to A.D. General in accordance with the Settlement Agreement. Finally, the City's representative has not ignored any information provided to him, and has, instead, provided alternatives to resolve these Stop Notice issues. The chronology below shows the correspondence relating to the A. D. General/Olson Precast situation. May 28, 2003 City Attorney (Best, Best, and Krieger) submitted a letter to offer a settlement to A.D. General Engineering regarding their outstanding claims. .- September 2, 2003 A.D. General South Highland Ave. Sewer Improvements Page 2 June 4, 2003 A.D. General submitted letter of acceptance for settlement of outstanding claims to the City Attorney (Best, Best, and Krieger) in the amount of $8,325.79 and requested additional discussion regarding the one year warranty. July 7, 2003 City received letter from Laura Nash, of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi; bonding counsel for A.D. General Engineering's bonding company. The letter requested that the City release partial payment to Olson Precast in the amount of $5,586.19, in exchange for a partial release of the stop notice filed by Olson Precast. July 14, 2003 City responded to Ms. Nash stating that the City's contractual arrangement is with A.D. General. The City does not make direct payment to subcontractors. July 15, 2003 City (Attn: Bragg, Harvilla, and Pursel) received a letter from A.D. General Engineering requesting release of retention, and referenced request from bonding company's attorney stating the stop notice from Olson Precast is invalid. A.D. General also stated that if payment was not received by date requested, steps towards compensation and damages will be sought after. July 17, 2003 City received a letter from Laura Nash, of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi; bonding company's attorney. Letter requested the City to investigate the possibility of releasing a two-party check to Olson Precast and A.D. General Engineering, in the amount of $5,586.19 to ensure payment to Olson Precast and further stating A.D. General Engineering was unable to make direct payment to Olson Precast due to limited cash flow. July 30, 2003 City sends letter to Laura Nash, of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi. Letter notifies Ms. Nash that the City has declined her request to issue a two-party check payable to A.D. General Engineering and Olson Precast. July 30, 2003 City received letter from Stanley Haren, of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi; requesting that the Citywithhold all fundingto A. D. General Engineering, q 9 stating A.D. General Engineering does not have the financial capacity to pay their subcontractors in a timely manner, thus exposing the bonding company to possible liability. July 31, 2003 City received letter from A.D. General Engineering requesting the City look into the dispute between A.D. General Engineering and Olson Precast, reiterating their opinion that the stop notice filed by Olson Precast is invalid. Respectfully, REDEVELOPMENT AND SPECIAL PROJECTS DEPARTMENT Raymond Bragg Director c: Yousuf Patanwala,City of Fontana _ Curt Ingraham,Associated Engineers George Harvilla, Parsons Brinckerhoff Laura Nash,Attorney Stanley Haren,Attorney HandIla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 2:31 PM To: 'Ray Bragg'; 'Yousuf Patanwala' Cc: Evelyne Ssenkoloto (essenkoloto@fontana.org); 'Carla Pursel' Subject: Status of A.D. General Contract Ray, Below is a summary of the financial status of the South Highland Sewer: Retained amount: $28,771.34 >to be confirmed by Evelyne/Carla Outstanding Stop Notices: $25,255.70 >to be confirmed by Evelyne/Carla Difference/Amount which can be released* $3,515.64 Settlement Agreement/Change Order 4* $8,325.79 * In my opinion,the City is obligated to issue a check to A. D. General for$11,841.43 ($3,515.64 + $8,325.79). However, the letter from Attorney Stanley Haren dated July 30, 2003 requests that the City not make any payments to A. D. General without the written consent of Fidelity& Deposit Company of Maryland. Should we get Kevin Randolph's opinion on this? Should this somehow be summarized and included in the response letter recently prepared? Yousuf, Carlos told me this morning you wanted an update, so this is where we are. George Status of A.D. General Contract Page 1 of 2 Harvilla, George From: Evelyne Ssenkoloto [essenkoloto@fontana.org] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 4:05 PM To: Ray Bragg; Harvilla, George Cc: Yousuf Patanwala Subject: RE: Status of A.D. General Contract FYI.. A copy of the signed Settlement Agreement&General Release has been mailed out certified to Mr. Scott Snyder at A.D. General. Evelyne'," Original Message From: Ray Bragg Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 3:10 PM To: 'Harvilla, George' Cc: Yousuf Patanwala; Evelyne Ssenkoloto Subject: RE: Status of A.D. General Contract I do not believe we have a contractual agreement with Fidelity& Deposit Company of Maryland. Therefore, I do not think we are obligated in any way to honor their request. Sounds like we owe AD General a check for$11,841.43. Let the existing chronology letter deal with the issues raised in the July 31 St letter only. Ray Raymond Bragg Redevelopment/Special Projects Director City of Fontana 909-350-7697 909-350-7676 (fax) Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 2:31 PM To: Ray Bragg; Yousuf Patanwala Cc: essenkoloto@fontana.org; Carla Pursel Subject: Status of A.D. General Contract Ray, Below is a summary of the financial status of the South Highland Sewer: Retained amount: $28,771.34 >to be confirmed by Evelyne/Carla Outstanding Stop Notices: $25,255.70 >to be confirmed by Evelyne/Carla 9/3/2003 Status of A.D. General Contract Page 2 of 2 Difference/Amount which can be released* $3,515.64 Settlement Agreement/Change Order 4* $8,325.79 * In my opinion, the City is obligated to issue a check to A. D. General for$11,841.43 ($3,515.64+ $8,325.79). However, the letter from Attorney Stanley Haren dated July 30,2003 requests that the City not make any payments to A. D. General without the written consent of Fidelity&Deposit Company of Maryland. Should we get Kevin Randolph's opinion on this? Should this somehow be summarized and included in the response letter recently prepared? Yousuf, Carlos told me this morning you wanted an update, so this is where we are. George 9/3/2003 DRAFT August 26, 2003 Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 Subject: South Highland Ave. Sewer Improvements Dear Mr. Snyder, This letter is in response to your letter to me dated July 31, 2003. In your letter, you requested two things. First, you requested that the City intervene into a dispute between you and one of your Subcontractors. Second, you requested that the City consider your bonding company's attorney's suggestion (July 17, 2003 letter by Laura Nash) of a two-party check to A.D. General and Olson Precast. Finally your letter suggests that the City has ignored your bonding company's findings. First, the City does not wish to intervene in a dispute between A.D. General and subcontractor Olson Precast. The City has no contractual arrangements with Olson Precast and therefore has no legal standing in your dispute. / e,mot u 4-17 L4 Second, the City of o tana haideclined to issue joint check as requested by your bonding company's attorney, (Letter dated July , 2003). The City can only release A. D. General's retention provided A. D. General provides a Stop Notice Bond for 125% of the Stop Notice amount per Public Contract Code Section 3196. This was stated in the City's July 14, 2003 letter to Ms. Laura Nash of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, LLP, and copied to A. D. General. Finally, the City's representative has not ignored any information provided to him, and has, instead, provided alternatives to resolve these Stop Notice issues. The chronology below shows the correspondence relating to the A. D. General/Olson Precast situation. May 28, 2003 City Attorney (Best, Best, and Krieger) submitted a letter to offer a settlement to A.D. General Engineering regarding their outstanding claims. June 4, 2003 A.D. General submitted letter of acceptance for settlement of outstanding claims to the City Attorney (Best, Best, and Krieger) in the amount of $8,325.79 and requested additional discussion regarding the one year warranty. www.fontana.org 8353 SIERRA AVENUE,FONTANA,CALIFORNIA,92335-3528(909)350-7600 r - July 7, 2003 City received letter from Laura Nash, of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi; bonding counsel for A.D. General Engineering's bonding company. The letter requested that the City release partial payment to Olson Precast in the amount of $5,586.19, in exchange for a partial release of the stop notice filed by Olson Precast. July 14, 2003 City responded to Ms. Nash stating that the City's contractual arrangement is with A.D. General. The City does not make direct payment to subcontractors. July 15, 2003 City (Attn: Bragg, Harvilla, and Purse!) received a letter from A.D. General Engineering requesting release of retention, and referenced request from bonding company's attorney stating the stop notice from Olson Precast is invalid. A.D. General also stated that if payment was not received by date requested, steps towards compensation and damages will be sought after. July 17, 2003 City received a letter from Laura Nash, of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi; bonding company's attorney. Letter requested the City to investigate the possibility of releasing a two-party check to Olson Precast and A.D. General Engineering, in the amount of $5,586.19 to ensure payment to Olson Precast and further stating A.D. General Engineering was unable to make direct payment to Olson Precast due to limited cash flow. July 30, 2003 City sends letter to Laura Nash, of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi. Letter notifies Ms. Nash that the City has declined her request to issue a two-party check payable to A.D. General Engineering and Olson Precast. July 30, 2003 City received letter from Stanley Haren, of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi; requesting that the City withhold all funding to A. D. General Engineering, stating A.D. General Engineering does not have the financial capacity to pay their subcontractors in a timely manner, thus exposing the bonding company to possible liability. July 31, 2003 City received letter from A.D. General Engineering requesting the City look into the dispute between A.D. General Engineering and Olson Precast, reiterating their opinion that the stop notice filed by Olson Precast is invalid. Respectfully, REDEVELOPMENT AND SPECIAL PROJECTS DEPARTMENT Raymond Bragg Director c: Yousuf Patanwala, City of Fontana Curt Ingraham, Associated Engineers George Harvilla, Parsons Brinckerhoff Laura Nash, Attorney Stanley Haren, Attorney www.fontana.org 8353 SIERRA AVENUE,FONTANA,CALIFORNIA,92335-3528(909)350-7600 Cityof Fontana '�►;„':11� �� CALIFORNIA 44. 94A �'�NsA 'tea DRAFT August 19, 2003 Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 Subject: South Highland Ave. Sewer Improvements Dear Mr. Snyder, This letter is in response to your letter to me dated July 31, 2003. The City of Fontana has only declined to issue a joint check as requested by your bonding company. The City will release A. D. General's retention provided A. D. General provides a Stop Notice Bond for 150% of the Stop Notice amount per Public Contract Code Section This was stated in the City's July 14, 2003 letter to Ms. Laura Nash of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, LLP, and copied to A. D. General. The City's representative has not ignored any information provided to him, and has instead provided alternatives to resolve these Stop Notice issues. The chronology below shows the correspondence relating to the A. D. General/Olson Precast situation. May 28, 2003 City Attorney submitted a letter to offer a settlement to A.D. General Engineering regarding their outstanding claims. June 4, 2003 A.D. General submitted letter of acceptance for settlement of outstanding claims to Best, Best, and Krieger in the amount of $8,325.79 and requested additional discussion of the one year warranty. July 7, 2003 Received letter from Laura Nash, of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi; bonding counsel for A.D. General Engineering's bonding company. Letter was to request the City release partial payment to Olson Precast in the amount of $5,586.19, in exchange for a partial release of the stop notice filed by Olson Precast. www.fontana.org 8353 SIERRA AVENUE,FONTANA,CALIFORNIA,92335-3528(909)350-7600 r II Cityof Fontana Ilk Vol! CALIFORNIA 0Oirp 44. July 14, 2003 City responded to Ms. Nash stating that the City does not make direct payment to subcontractors. July 15, 2003 City (Attn: Bragg, Harvilla, and Pursel) received letter from A.D. General Engineering requesting release of retention, and referenced request from bond counsel stating stop notice from Olson Precast is invalid. A.D. General also stated that if payment was not received by date requested, steps towards compensation and damages will be sought after. July 17, 2003 Received letter from Laura Nash, of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi; bonding counsel for A.D. General Engineering's bonding company. Letter was to investigate the possibility of the City releasing a two-party check to Olson Precast and A.D. General Engineering, in the amount of $5,586.19 to ensure payment to Olson Precast, stating A.D. General Engineering is unable to make direct payment to Olson Precast due to limited cash flow. July 30, 2003 Letter submitted to Laura Nash, of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi; bonding counsel for A.D. General Engineering's bonding company. Letter was to notify Ms. Nash that the City has declined her request to issue a two-party check payable to A.D. General Engineering and Olson Precast. July 30, 2003 Received letter from Stanley Haren, of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi; bonding counsel for A.D. General Engineering's bonding company requesting the City withhold all funding to A. D. General Engineering, stating A.D. General Engineering does not have the financial capacity to pay their subcontractors in a timely manner, thus exposing the bonding company to possible liability. July 31, 2003 Received letter from A.D. General Engineering requesting the City research the dispute between A.D. General Engineering and Olson Precast, reiterating the stop g 9 g notice filed by Olson Precast is invalid. Sincerely, REDEVELOPMENT AND SPECIAL PROJECTS DEPARTMENT Raymond Bragg Director c: Yousuf Patanwala, City of Fontana Curt Ingraham, Associated Engineers George Harvilla, Parsons Brinckerhoff www.fontana.org 8353 SIERRA AVENUE,FONTANA,CALIFORNIA,92335-3528(909)350-7600 AGL.COM I Message View Page 1 of 1 Subj: A.D. General Response Letter Date: 8/19/2003 4:01:29 PM Eastern Daylight Time From: GHarvilla To: essenkoloto@fontana.org File: 8 19 03.doc Evelyne, Please forward this letter to Kevin Randolph, Ray Bragg, and Carla for their review. Kevin, the July 30 letter in the chronology was copied to A.D General 's attorney, but not to Scott Snyder directly. so it's possible he has not seen it - so should it be mentioned in this letter at all? George Harvilla http://webmail.aol.com/fmsgview.adp?folder=T1VUQk9Y&uid=7085728 8/19/2003 CITY OF FONTRNR Aug 14 '03 17:48 P.01 CITY OF FONTRfA >k>k Tr-anscoit C✓on-F _ Report * 'k P. 1 Aug 14 '03 15:43 D.0. 7 Check condition of remote Fax. 9427916 ,,' ,},4 , 835,'.Sierra Avenue . wr:,P,,, -.Pk Fontana, California, 92335 - p r Y O F 0 t rw N.r (909)350-6792 t911{J1 : SO-7676,fat - c•-moil_ cpurscl@,fonta1.o4 P N!t.* ^<,.., Wp^ i4i a �rw Q r :. ,'.'' • 7;u,•��i11 iFA .tti I1JS! r, t Fax.- 427-91 To; George Carla Purses Date: 8/14/2003 Print!: Administrative Project Coordinator — -- Re: Ail GENERAL INFO Pages_ B r Q Urgent �For Review Per Your Request U Pl&ase Reply 0 Pleat.Fte cYcle Here's the stuff you can't get a-mail- So does that mean you and Jack are just sitting around doing nothing??! f The asphalt stuff is attached too. i - . ` ; r , , 6, cya! 411 i k. :1 t �. 4) cp . 1,' 1/i. k Carla S.Purses Administrative Project Coordinator Redevelopment/Special Projects Department (If any page is not received, please call me at rhc number listed above) CITY OF FONTANA Rug 14 '03 17:48 P.02 Page 1 of 1 Carla Pursel From: Carla Pursel $ent: Thursday, August 14,2003 To: George Harvilla PB Subject: Correspondence vv/Al)General Importance: High .George: • . . . . SlR �� • Is this how you wanted the information prepared??? I do not have a copy of the letter from the City Attorn to AD General, I hope you still have a copy (to add the date). I did not include dates of corres between Associated and AD because 1 do not have copies of the corres that was sent(i.e., first change order#4 and waiver). Let me know if you want any changes. Ccri-a S Y-Aurse1 -7(1i 71/.7/51rative rq tct Coca-tfzator C.I7kOT O.9V�, ., 7eaa'.7<Pfbpament j7e_cia/ roj?ctr c( 96 670.t;;7,92 • 8/14/2003 CITY OF FONTANA Aug 7 4 '03 17:48 P.Oi CITY OF FON'FANA. CITY OF FONTANA i • Rede elopmirii/,�l>c c:ial Projects t, , Departrixtr it. ,, . • MEMORANDUM TO: GEORGE HARVILLA, P.E. PROJECT MANAGER, PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF FROM: CARLA PURSEL ADMINISTRATIVE PROJECT COORDINATOR SUBJECT: A.D. GENERAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CORRESPONDENCE CHRONOLOGY DATE: AUGUST 14, 2003 The following is a brief chronology regarding the correspondence between the City of Fontana and A.D. General Engineering regarding the South Highland-Walnut-Juniper Sewer Project (SP46-02). May, , 2003 1 City Attorney submitted a letter to offer a settlement to A.D. General Engineering regarding their outstanding claims. June 4, 2003 / A.D. General submitted letter of acceptance for settlement of outstanding claims to A.D. General Engineering in the amount of $8,325.79 and requested additional discussion of the one year warranty. July 7, 2003 Received letter from Laura Nash, of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi; / bonding counsel for A.D. General Engineering's bonding company. v Letter was to request the City release partial payment to Olson Precast in the amount of$5,586,19, in exchange or a partial release of the stop notice filed by Olson Precast. July 14, 2003 City responded to Ms. Nash stating that the City does not make direct payment to subcontractors. July 15, 2003 City (Attn: Bragg, Harvilla, and Pursel) received letter from A.D. General Engineering requesting release of retention, and referenced j request from bond counsel stating stop notice from Olson Precast is invalid. A.D. General also stated that if payment was not received by date requested, steps towards compensation and damages will be sought after. J }� CITY OF FONTANA Aug 14 '03 17:48 P.04 -..._. ._. , - T_.... .- .. July 15, 2003 City (Attn: Bragg, Harvilla, and Pursel) received letter from A.D. General Engineering stating they had contacted Ayala Boring . `` requesting them to release their stop notice and requested the (- Agency take the same action, due to their believing the stop notice to be invalid. July 15, 2003 City (Attn: Bragg, Harvilla, and Pursel) received letter from A.D. '� General Engineering informing the City that releases of stop notices• had been provided from Robert's Ready Mix and Tim Sigman Paving,. July 17, 2003 Received letter from Laura Nash, of Robins, Kaplan, Miller& Ciresi; bonding counsel for A.D. General Engineering's bonding company_ Letter was to investigate the possibility of the City releasing a two- party check to Olson Precast and A.D. General Engineering, in the' amount of $5,586.19 to ensure payment to Olson Precast, stating A.D. General Engineering is unable to make direct payment to Olson t Precast due to limited cash flow. "ray Z(�"�pJ� g4 t' /3C�04 l ( e • , July 25, 2003 Letter submitted (via FedEx) to A.D. General Engineering informing x them that Change Order No. 4 was revised and that the City is to absorb the inspection costs. Revised Change Order No. 4 in the amount of $8,325.79 was attached for signature by A.D. General Engineering, to be returned. July 30, 2003 Letter submitted to Laura Nash, of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi; bonding counsel for A.D. General Engineering's bonding company_ J Letter was to notify Ms. Nash that the City has declined her request to issue a two-party check payable to A.D. General Engineering and Olson Precast_ July 30, 2003 Received letter from Stanley Haren,of Robins, Kaplan, Miller&Ciresi; bonding counsel for A.D. General Engineering's bonding company requesting the City withhold all funding to A. D. General Engineering, stating A.D.General Engineering does not have the financial capacity to pay their subcontractors in a timely manner, thus exposing the bonding company to possible liability. July 31, 2003 i Received letter from A.D. General Engineering requesting the City research the dispute between A.D. General Engineering and Olson Precast, reiterating the stop notice filed by Olson Precast is invalid. J v1 2/ 2 e v 3 LeitCr .o '5; / C%e',/_t ar."(e- 7"'y(w�i:G 4 .. c�-/led %:-J r J,,,, L J C A i/rI a..s /i 2t/C r Cl 41 It Y-C/eJ /" �-/�7 Draft Letter to A. D. General Page 1 of 1 Harvilla, George From: Yousuf Patanwala[ypatanwala@fontana.org] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 7:22 AM 1 To: Harvilla, George CGi y [,, I' Subject: RE: Draft Letter to A. D. General I F George this letter is not a good enough response. Please inc in -"er references with dates to the letters received from AD General or the bonding company and the City responses to them. It will be good to attach copies of those responses again with this letter. Yousuf Patanwala Principal Civil Engineer/Construction Section Community Development Department Engineering Division (909)350-6645 Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 5:18 PM To: Ray Bragg; Yousuf Patanwala; cpursel@fontana.org Subject: Draft Letter to A. D. General Ray/Yousuf/Carla, Attached is a draft letter to A. D. General in response to their letter to Ray dated July 31,2003. This draft letter is based on hand-written notes provided by Yousuf. Yousuf, I did not mention Ralph Roberts. I called Ralph and he said the bonding company representative had spoken to him. The bonding representative asked Ralph if he know why the concrete at the bottom of the manholes cracked, and he responded that there's no way to tell. He was also asked if$14K was a reasonable amount to dig out the broken manholes. He replied that would be a reasonable effort but didn't say Scott was actually entitled to this amount. • George • «8 7 03.doc» 8/11/2003 aVI 4 t 1 ! oCity of Fo tanav 4 y, CALIFORNIA 44, 1174 pvZ f• Aar D R A F T August 7, 2003 Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 Subject: South Highland Ave. Sewer Improvements Dear Mr. Snyder, This letter is in response to your letter to me dated July 31, 2003. The City of Fontana has only declined to issue a joint check as requested by your bonding company. The City will release A. D. General's retention provided A. D. General provides a Stop Notice Bond for 150% of the Stop Notice amount per Public Contract Code Section This was stated in the City's July 14, 2003 letter to Ms. Laura Nash of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, LLP, and copied to A. D. General. The City's representative has not ignored any information provided to him, and has instead provided alternatives to resolve these Stop Notice issues.goi.- ., t o, 4_ /G 79C, Fplo),, vc� vSincerely, • REDEVELOPMENT AND SPECIAL PROJECTS DEPARTMENT tr o Raymond Bragg r k° Director S e. c: Yousuf Patanwala, City of Fontana Curt Ingraham, Associated Engineers .c George Harvilla, Parsons Brinckerhoff r vx I l; www.fontana.org 8353 SIERRA AVENUE.FONTANA,CALIFORNIA,92335-3528(909)350-7600 Letter From Attorney Page 1 of 2 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday,August 07, 2003 5:17 PM To: 'Yousuf Patanwala' Subject: RE: Letter From Attorney I called Attorney Stanley Haren today. He said that since he has been dealing with A. D. General's Attorney, Kirk McDonald, that he faxed it to him (Kirk). He was concerned about sending it directly to Kirk's client (A.D. General). George Original Message From: Yousuf Patanwala [mailto:ypatanwala@fontana.org] Sent: Wednesday,August 06, 2003 6:10 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: Letter From Attorney George, with the latest letter from AD General it has become very essential that bonding company informs their client or we will have to tell bonding company that City has to pass that information on to AD General. Yousuf Patanwala Principal Civil Engineer/Construction Section Community Development Department Engineering Division (909)350-6645 Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Monday,August 04, 2003 3:47 PM To: Yousuf Patanwala Subject: RE: Letter From Attorney I• can call Mr. Heren to verify. • • Original Message From: Yousuf Patanwala [mailto:ypatanwala@fontana.org] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 2:36 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: Letter From Attorney George how would we know that contractor has been notified.? Yousuf Patanwala Principal Civil Engineer/Construction Section Community De velopment ment Department Engineering Division (909)350-6645 Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 5:19 PM 8/11/2003 Letter From Attorney Page 2 of 2 To: Carla Pursel; Yousuf Patanwala Subject: Letter From Attorney I spoke to Stanley Haren from Robins, Kaplan, Miller and Ciresi. He will send a copy of his July 30, 2003 letter to A.D. General. George • 8/11/2003 Letter From Attorney Page 1 of 1 Harvilla, George From: Yousuf Patanwala[ypatanwala@fontana.org] CG'7 Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 6:10 PM /7/ dY-7/6 3. / 1 c_ To: Harvilla, George ,,. :if Aw, e — K < G Subject: RE: Letter From Attorney G,Q �/'/� es dP George,with the latest letter from AD General it has become very essential that bonding company informs their client or we will have to tell bonding company that City has to pass that information on to AD General. Yousuf Patanwala Principal Civil Engineer/Construction Section Community Development Department Engineering Division (909)350-6645 Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 3:47 PM To: Yousuf Patanwala Subject: RE: Letter From Attorney I can call Mr. Heren to verify. • Original Message From: Yousuf Patanwala [mailto:ypatanwala@fontana.org] Sent: Monday,August 04, 2003 2:36 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: Letter From Attorney George how would we know that contractor has been notified.? Yousuf Patanwala Principal Civil Engineer/Construction Section Community Development Department Engineering Division (909)350-6645 Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Thursday,July 31, 2003 5:19 PM To: Carla Pursel; Yousuf Patanwala Subject: Letter From Attorney I spoke to Stanley Haren from Robins, Kaplan, Miller and Ciresi. He will send a copy of his July 30, 2003 letter to A.D. General. George 8/7/2003 Jul 31 03 07; 40p 00000000000000000000. 559-5502 P•2 • All ,G 4 2003 General Engineering Censinicdon lnc� • 2829 ph 8 Ste )t 5 s ri81 S59 �ax(8169-502 July 31, 2003 City of Fontana Attn: Ray Bragg 8353 Sierra Ave, Fontana,CA 92335 Re: South Highland Ave. Sewer Improvements Dear Ray Bragg, I ask Fontana's City Officials to look into the dispute between Olson Precast Company and A.D. General Engineering on the South Highland Ave.Sewer Improvement Project. My Company A.D. General Engineering Inc.,was the Prime Contractor, one of our Sub Contractors,Olson?recast Company filed a"Stop Notice"for S19,660.00. A.D. General disputed the amount claimed, stating Olson Precast is only owed$ 5,587.00 Company has investigated Olson's claim,interviewed both parties and the Project Our Bonding A yan Inspector Mr.Ralph Roberts. The bonding company has determined Olson's claim as invalid and A.D. General's to be true and accurate. Re The Bonding Company provided the Agency'sresentative with the finding and also with a p request to follow their directions to release Retention and Olson's claim. It was made known to the agency and its iepresentatives that they would be held"harmless"in all matters. Yet,despite this the Agency Representatives have chosen to ignore all this and elected to withhold AD. General's Retention because of Olson's claim. So,once again A.D. General ask that you look into this matter, since the Agency Representatives have chosen to openly ignore the Bonding Company's findings. Your prompt attention in this matter is appreciated. S nnoerely .{ 7 V Scott A. Snyder president&CEO A.D. General Engineering Construction Inc., • -Vo NO Cr-ei,"------0A . . -I- - • . ') o \ c.14._ Ylaltu-t-At.,! ill 1ev:I wv:9 . . . Cs-vv-twkAA-1 , .,.....) t . 4e"_,t-- si- -D wsti( __ 1 7, N •I't t-e-- a—,e-v-A4----(3.4 -0 1-,al.;.04-LJ ';,;si / , , l-CL.. IICAA1 Ltr,-%%"., VC I: IL- . ,,. oi afiV14::)t-PA/V",41,r1' preri4 a•-(---r1 I. (: 1-1'-'-- VreP ! i if �� E �'�, 41/4. City of Fontana ` ���,,,.�` �, Il � � CALIFORNIA DRAFT August 7, 2003 Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 Subject: South Highland Ave. Sewer Improvements Dear Mr. Snyder, This letter is in response to your letter to me dated July 31, 2003. The City of Fontana has only declined to issue a joint check as requested by your bonding company. The City will release A. D. General's retention provided A. D. General provides a Stop Notice Bond for 150% of the Stop Notice amount per Public Contract Code Section . This was stated in the City's July 14, 2003 letter to Ms. Laura Nash of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, LLP, and copied to A. D. General. The City's representative has not ignored any information provided to him, and has instead provided alternatives to resolve these Stop Notice issues. Sincerely, REDEVELOPMENT AND SPECIAL PROJECTS DEPARTMENT Raymond Bragg Director c: Yousuf Patanwala, City of Fontana Curt Ingraham, Associated Engineers George Harvilla, Parsons Brinckerhoff www.fontana.org 8353 SIERRA AVENUE,FONTANA,CALIFORNIA.92335-3528(909)350-7600 FW: Letter to A.D. General Page 1 of 2 Harvilla, George From: Yousuf Patanwala[ypatanwala@fontana.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 5:36 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: Letter to A.D. General George the only thing I will add to the letter is letting AD general know that Ralph has no direct communication with the bonding company as stated in his letter( Ralph needs to confirm this statement). /,/y (1)-- Yousuf Patanwala rid Principal Civil Engineer/Construction Section ' 7 5"r Y K. Community Development Department sled-r / - d e .o P T ,,d- , y Engineering Division f-�r (909)350-6645 r H J ? Original Message We- From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:19 PM s9 ( F!c ,00° r6. 4�,6, . To: Yousuf Patanwala Subject: FW: Letter to A.D. General Jul ��c� �, G LD, �C,(! Yousuf, I got your notes on a response to A.D. General. What about adding what I am suggesting below? l George �� (,�, . o • Original Message From: Harvilla, George Sent:Tuesday, August 05, 2003 5:02 PM To: 'Carla Pursel' Subject: Letter to A.D. General Carla, Scott's letter dated July 31, 2003 was addressed to Ray,so a response letter should come from Ray. I spoke to Ralph Roberts today. He said that when he spoke to Bruce from Olson Precast he showed Bruce the Daily Inspection Reports, but did not take sides in the dispute. In the letter, I would propose saying (if Yousuf concurs): The City paid A.D. General for the installation of the manholes. A.D. General opted to use Olson Precast to provide the manholes and made an agreement with them. This is a two-party agreement. The city will not intervene in this private agreement. There are options available to you to settle this, such as mediation. 8/7/2003 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 5:02 PM To: 'Carla Pursel' Subject: Letter to A.D. General Carla, Scott's letter dated July 31, 2003 was addressed to Ray, so a response letter should come from Ray. I spoke to Ralph Roberts today. He said that when he spoke to Bruce from Olson Precast he showed Bruce the Daily Inspection Reports, but did not take sides in the dispute. In the letter, I would propose saying (if Yousuf concurs): The City paid A.D. General for the installation of the manholes. A.D. General opted to use Olson Precast to provide the manholes and made an agreement with them. This is a two-party agreement. The city will not intervene in this private agreement. There are options available to you to settle this, such as mediation. George Jul 31 03 07: 40p 00000000000000000000. 559-5502 P• 2 Le Genera!Engineering Construction Inc, Phone2829 N.Gjenoaks Blvd.818)S59- t383e 1`i Fat(818)I M-5502tina,Ca OR July 31,2003 City of Fontana Attn: Ray Bragg • 8353 Sierra Ave. Fontana,CA 92335 Re: South Highland Ave. Sewer Improvements • Dear Ray Bragg, I ask Fontana's City Officials to look into the dispute between Olson Precast Company and A.D. General F.ngineering on the South Highland Ave-Sewer Improvement Project. My Company A.D. General Engineering Inc.,was the Pr„for S Contractor 60 t70,one AoD our Sub Contractors,Olson Precast Company filed a Stop Not eneral disputed the amount claimed, stating Olson Precast is only owed$5,587.00 Our Bonding Company has investigated Olson's claim, interviewed both parties and the Project Inspector Mr.Ralph Roberts. The bonding company has determined Olson's claim as invalid and A.D. General's to be true and accurate. • Re The Bonding Company provided the Agency'sresentative with the finding and also with a p request to follow their directions to release Retention and Olson's claim. It was made known to the agency and its fepresentatives that they would be held"harmless"in all matters. Yet,despite this the Agency Representatives have chosen to ignore all this and elected to withhold A.D. General's Retention because of Olson's claim. So,once again A.D. General ask that you look into this matter, since the Agency Representatives have chosen to openly ignore the Bonding Company's findings. Your prompt attention in this matter is appreciated. Sinperely, Scott A. Snyder president& CEO A.D. General Engineering Construction Inc., #iarviila, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday, July 31,2003 5:19 PM To: 'Carla Pursel'; 'Yousuf Patanwala' Subject: Letter From Attorney I spoke to Stanley Haren from Robins, Kaplan, Miller and Ciresi. He will send a copy of his July 30,2003 letter to A.D. General. George JUL 30 2003 17=19 FR R K M & C L.L.P. 13102295480 TO 919093507676 P.01/04 SUIT63700 2049 CENTURY PARK EAST ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. LOS ANGELES.CA 90067-3211 TEL_310-S52-0130 FAX:310.229.5800 www.rkme.eem ATTORNEYS AT LAW FROM: Stanley Haren The information contained in this facsimile message is privileged and confidential information intended for the use of the addressee listed below and no one else. If you are not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver this message to the intended recipient,please do not use this transmission in any way,but contact the sender by telephone. DATE: July 30, 2003 TO: Raymond Bragg FACSIMILE NO.: 909/350-7676 TELEPHONE NO.: FILE NO.: NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: 4 If transmission problems occur, or you are not the intended recipient, please call (310) 552-0130, or contact at. MESSAGE: Original: X Mailed Not Mailed ATLANTA , BOSTON LOS ANOELES MINNEAPOLIS NAPLES ORANGE COUNTY SAINT PAUL WASHINGTON, L.C. JUL 30 2003 17:19 FR R K M & C L.L.P. 13102295400 TO 919093507676 P.02/04 SUITE 3700 2049 ROBINS , ti n AN MILLER CIRESI I I LOS ARMS,CA 90067-N11 TEL:310-552-0130 FAX:3 t0-229-56 www.rkmc.cam ATTORNEYS AT LAW • STANLEY HAREN July 30, 2003 Via facsimile--909/3507676 and regular mail • Raymond Bragg Redevelopment Special Projects Director City of Fontana 8383 Sierra Avenue Fontana, CA 92335 Re: Claim No. 638 0035114 001 Bond No. : Fidelity&Deposit Company of Maryland Bond No. PRP 854860l Principal : A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. Project SP-46-02; South Highland Ave, &Juniper Ave. Sewer System Improvements Notice to Withhold Funds Dear Mr. Bragg: This office is outside counsel for Fidelity& Deposit Company of Maryland, the performance and payment bond surety of A D General Engineering, Inc. We are authorized as Fidelity& Deposit's attorney in fact to send this notice to withhold funds. Fidelity& Deposit has received claims by subcontractors and material supplies of A D General Engineering Construction Inc., claiming payment for labor,materials and services provided on this project. We are informed that A to General engineering does not presently have the financial capacity to timely pay these subcontractors and material suppliers. Consequently, Fidelity and Deposit is now exposed to liability under its payment bond, and may have further exposure under its performance bond and other bonds issued on behalf of A 0 General Engineering, Word 60020825.1 ATLANTn , 00STON LDS ANGELL: S m INNWOL [ S • NArLES • ONANN a t: nvNTY• SaINT PAUL • WASHIN GTGN, O.0 JUL 30 2003 17!19 FR R K M & C L.L.P. 13102295480 TO 919093507676 P.03/04 Raymond Bragg July 30, 2003 Page 2 • We are presently in communication with A D General Engineering to investigate all relevant facts concerning all of the claims against the above project and the claims received. Fidelity&Deposit hereby demands that the City of Fontana release no further • funds to A D General Engineering Construction Inc. on the above project, including earned and unearned progress payments,retention change orders or other payments, without the express, in advance,written consent of Fidelity& Deposit Company of Maryland. This demand is based upon Fidelity& Deposit's rights under a general indemnity agreement and executed by A I) General Engineering as consideration for of Fidelity& Deposit's issuance of these bonds. The agreement provides that A D General Engineering, in the event of claims or potential liability against of Fidelity& Deposit's bonds, assigns to Fidelity& Deposit, all funds due or to become due on all ongoing contracts including the above contract. This demand is also based upon Fidelity & Deposit's common law rights of subrogation as a surety, whereby funds payable under private contract constitutes security for the surety's benefit in the event of liability or potential liability under the surety's bonds. Any failure or refusal by the City of Fontana to comply with this demand will severely prejudice of Fidelity& Deposit's rights and could have serious legal consequences. If you have any questions concerning this notice, please contact this office immediately. We will be in contract with you shortly to discuss all of the issues as our investigation proceeds. Word 6002O825.I JUL 30 2003 17:19 FR R K M & C L.L.P. 13102295490 TO 919093507G7G P.04/04 a-^ Raymond Bragg July 30,2003 Page 3 Nothing herein in intended to or should be construed as a waiver,estoppel release or modification of any of Fidelity & Deposit's rights, defense or remedies under the above bonds, or the general indemnity agreement referenced herein, all of which are reserved. very truly yours, RO S, LAN,M ER&CIRESI L.L.P. Stanley Haren SH/ab cc: Dennis Harvey Ward 6OO2O$25.1 ** TOTAL PAGE.04 ** ;Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday,July 24, 2003 5:52 PM To: 'scoff@adgenengr.com' Cc: 'Ray Bragg'; Yousuf Patanwala(ypatanwala@fontana.org); 'Curt Ingraham'; 'Carla Pursel' Subject: Change Order No. 4 Scott, By now you have most likely received a letter from Associated Engineers which included Change Order No. 4 and a waiver prepared by the City Attorney. City staff has discussed the issue of the inspector's overtime and has decided to absorb this cost. I will forward you a revised Change Order in the near future which will consist only of the $8325.79 settlement. George Harvilla Consultant Project Manager ilarvifla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Friday,July 18, 2003 9:02 AM To: Curt Ingraham (curti@assoc-eng.com) Subject: FW: Letter to A.D. General Importance: High Curt, You can also mention in your cover letter that deducting the cost of inspector overtime is addressed in Section 6-7.2 of the specifications. George Original Message From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday,July 17, 2003 5:19 PM To: Curt Ingraham curti@assoc-en .com ; 'Carla Pursel' 9 ( 9 ) Cc: 'Yousuf Patanwala'; 'tomm@assoc-eng.com'; Tom Holliman (tholliman@bovleenqineering.com) Subject: Importance: High Curt, I have reviewed Change Order Number 4, but I've revised it(attached). According to Tom Manley,the total amount of inspection overtime was$8,585. This cost was to be split between A. D. General and the City. So,the amount A.D. General owes for inspection is$4,292.50. When you send (please overnight)this to Scott, also include a waiver prepared by the City Attorney for the$8325.79. (Carla, please forward the waiver to Curt). Also, I assume you will have a cover letter reminding Scott of the inspection overtime. According to Tom Holliman,the agreement on overtime occurred when A.D. General met with Associated and the City to discuss the first round of change order items (October 2002). Remind Scott that we cannot process his final payment until he signs the waiver and Change Order. Please try to get this out Monday if possible and fax me copies. Thanks, George Change Order No. 4 Revised.xls... Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Wednesday,July 23, 2003 4:14,PM To: Yousuf Patanwala (ypatanwala@fontana.org) Cc: 'Ray Bragg'; 'Carla Pursel'; Bretz,Timothy; Curt Ingraham (curti@assoc-eng.com) Subject: South Highland Sewer Update The attached telephone memo will give you an idea of how things are going on the South Highland Sewer. George Telephone Memo 7 23 03.doc(26... Telephone Memo July 23, 2003 Today I received a call from Scott Snyder of A.D. General Construction. I asked him about an e-mail to me dated July 21, 2003 in which he was complaining about the Ayala claim, which had already been settled. He said that the e-mail was a mistake and should never have been sent to me. I then told him he would be receiving Change Order 4, which included a charge for half of the inspector's overtime. He got belligerent, denied agreeing to this at the October 2002 meeting in Ontario, called me an expletive, and hung up. George Harvilla 7-23-03 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Monday;July 21, 2003 9:22 AM To: Yousuf Patanwala(ypatanwala@fontana.org) Cc: 'Carla Purser; Curt Ingraham (curti@assoc-eng.com) Subject: FW: How Is All his Justified ef", h 3 tic- f r�� w Wr l< FYI � 8a,s z> Original Message I ,"� r From: scott@adgenengr.com [mailto:scott@adgenengr.com] "n Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 7:35 AM j , To: Harvilla, George V,/1 In 5 ate" Cc: curti@assoc-eng.com f' //' Subject: How Is All his Justified 0 re 1,41 George, $ f � .[^c• Below is the letter I wrote that I think may tie in some way with the latest unbelievable acts from the City of Fontana and or it's representatives for this project. I imagine the local news papers would like to hear the answer as well. You know I'm real anxious to hear the explanation for agreeing to pay on Ayala's claim after being rejected three or four previous times. I know their not being paid because of Tom Holliman's slanderous and untrue statements during that April 4th meeting that A. D. was to blame. Tom stated to Ralph Ayala how A.D. did not notify Assoc of Ayala's changed condition/claim. Nor did A.D. turn in paper work for their claim until 3 months after. I take considerable exception to this and other similar statements Tom made to the Ayala's concerning their claim. Had I been present I doubt such things would've been said, and if so I would have addressed the matter then. There's lots of written documentation that can come out proving who clearly didn't do their job, in this matter and many others. Back to Ayala's claim. It will be interesting hearing the explanations about why Ayala was paid extra?. All from a phone call someone. What kind of call can change a 4 times denied invalid claim into a suddenly approved claim and for nearly $12,000.00. ! ! It was shown at a meeting to Holliman, R.Roberts, and you George, in the SSPWC (green book) , it states, Boring and or Tunneling "SHALL" be a continues operation, proceeding NON-STOP until the entire length of bore is complete. Failure to do this results in the casing becoming siezed in place when operation tries to resume from where bore was stopped. We know Ayala did not bore continuesly and when they tried to resume the casing become stuck. Tom Holliman and you George told us at this meeting, specificly Jodie and I, that Ayala alone was to blame for the problems they had, you deny their claim again. Jodie told Tom to put this in writing like the other denied replys for Ayala which he eventually did. Explain how Ayala ends up receiving nearly $12,000.00 extra they do not deserve. Scott A. Snyder President,CEO A.D. General Engineering Const Inc. g g 1 Harvilla, George From: scott@adgenengr.com Sent: Saturday,July 19, 2003 7:35 AM To: Harvilla, George -Cc: -curti@assoc-eng.com Subject: How Is All his Justified George, Below is the letter I wrote that I think may tie in some way with the latest unbelievable acts from the City of Fontana and or it's representatives for this project. I imagine the local news papers would like to hear the answer as well. You know I'm real anxious to hear the explanation for agreeing to pay on Ayala's claim after being rejected three or four previous times. I know their not being paid because of Tom Holliman's slanderous and untrue statements during that April 4th meeting that A. D. was to blame. Tom stated to Ralph Ayala how A.D. did not notify Assoc of Ayala's changed condition/claim. Nor did A.D. turn in paper work for their claim until 3 months after. I take considerable exception to this and other similar statements Tom made to the Ayala's concerning their claim. Had I been present I doubt such things would've been said, and if so I would have addressed the matter then. There's lots of written documentation that can come out proving who clearly didn't do their job, in this matter and many others. Back to Ayala's claim. It will be interesting hearing the explanations about why Ayala was paid extra?. All from a phone call someone. What kind of call can change a 4 times denied invalid claim into a suddenly approved claim and for nearly $12,000.00. ! ! It was shown at a meeting to Holliman, R.Roberts, and you George, in the SSPWC (green book) , it states, Boring and or Tunneling "SHALL" be a continues operation, proceeding NON-STOP until the entire length of bore is complete. Failure to do this results in the casing becoming siezed in place when operation tries to resume from where bore was stopped. We know Ayala did not bore continuesly and when they tried to resume the casing become stuck. Tom Holliman and you George told us at this meeting, specificly Jodie and I, that Ayala alone was to blame for the problems they had, you deny their claim again. Jodie told Tom to put this in writing like the other denied replys for Ayala which he eventually did. Explain how Ayala ends up receiving nearly $12,000.00 extra they do not deserve. Scott A. Snyder President;CEO A.D. General Engineering Const Inc. 1 FAX • -roo YEARS PARSONS 16689 Foothill Boulevard BRINCKERHOFF Suite 103 ._ Fontana,CA 92335 909-427-9166 Fax:909-427-9169 harvilla@pbworld.com � To: From: George Harvilla 4''- fc r--_� Date: 7 / r_ Project No.: Fax No.: 75--a _ 7 67 G No. of Pages (including this page): y • • Subject: r" / • Comments: P/«.ft A: - _ G r( 74'4> < Off+ J- (14r Hi- co-,• • Over a Century of Engineering Excellence RESPONSE REQUESTED JUL 17 2003 18:30 FR R K M & C L.L.P. 13102295480 TO 919094279169 P.01/02 $urTE3700 2049 ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. LosANNYUAYPA90067- LOS ANGEL6S,CA 90067-321I TEL:310-552.0130 PAX:310-229-5800 www.rkmt.eom -ATTORNEYS AT LAW._J FROM: Laura P. Nash The information contained in this facsimile message is privileged and confidential information intended for the use of the addressee listed below and no one else. If you are not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver this message to the intended recipient, please do not use this transmission in any way,but contact the sender by telephone, DATE: July 17,2003 TO: George Harvilla Parsons Brinkerhoff FACSIMILE NO.: 9091427-9169 TELEPHONE Na: FILE NO.: 240127.pending(AD/Fontana) NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: If transmission problems occur,or you are not the intended recipient,please call(310)552-0130_ MESSAGE_ Original: X Mailed Not Mailed ATLANTA BOSTON r LOS ANGELES I MINNEAPOLIS NAPLES ORANGE COUNTY SAINT PAUL WASHINGTON. D.C. 60020118.1 JUL 17 2003 18:30 FR R K M & C L.L.P. 13102295460 TO 919094279169 P.02/02 S1'17E 3700 ROBINS, KAPT , MILLER & CIRESI -L.P :� 4��,T��, PaF��..;.T LOS ANGELE$,CA OOOh'-a=1 TEL:310-552•0130 F':1s: 1111 ATTORNEYS AT LAW LAURA P.NASH July 17, 2003 Via Facsimile and US. Mail 909/427.9169 Mr. George Harvilla Parsons Brinkerhoff 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, CA 92335 Re: Claim No. : 638 0035114 001 Bond No, PRF 8548601 Principal A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. Project • South Highland Ave. & Juniper Ave. Sewer System Improvements, Sp-46-02 Our File No. : 240127.pending Dear Mr. Harvilla: This will acknowledge receipt of your letter dated July 14, 2003 in response to my letter dated July 7, 2003. Would the City of Fontana be willing to issue a joint check for the undisputed amount of the Stop Notice filed by Olson Precast Company? A.D. General Engineering Construction,Inc. has advised that upon receipt of a two party check for$5,586,19 it will sign the check and forward it to Olson Precast Company. A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. is unable to pay this money directly due limited cash flow at the moment. I would appreciate hearing from you regarding this proposal. Very truly yours, ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER &CIRESI L.L.P. • P Laura P. Nash LPN/ln cc: Gregory W. Kilburn (via facsimile) Jodie Snyder(via facsimile) 60020111.1 L A N T A • R O S T o N L O S A N G E L E S SAINT P A U L • W A 5 FI 1 nr c T n a ** TOTAL PAGE.02 ** gull . / /04 City of Fontana CALIFORNIA 1`111111 �;iij sal^;... %t'•.''� . Nq 'ALA July 30, 2003 /ma4 s' Iuiu.. Laura P. Nash ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI, LLP 2049 Century Park East, Suite 3700 Los Angeles, California, 90067-3211 RE: Claim No.: 638 0035114 001 Bond No.: PRF 8548601 Principal: A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. Project: South Highland Avenue & Juniper Avenue Sewer System Improvements, SP-46-02 Your File: . 240127.pending Dear Ms. Nash, I have read your letter to me dated July 17, 2003, and have discussed it with senior staff at the City. We respectfully decline.your request for the City to issue a joint check for the undisputed amount of the Stop Notice filed by Olson Precast Company. Respectfully, Rede elopment & Special Projects Department orge Harvilla Project Manager GH:cp c: Raymond Bragg, Redevelopment&Special Projects Director Yousuf Patanwala,Sr. Civil Engineer Jodi Snyder,A.D.General Engineering www.fontana.org 8353 SIERRA AVENUE FONTANA, CALIFORNIA 92335-3528 (909) 350-7600 recycled paper Harvrlla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday,July 24, 2003 5:34 PM To: 'Carla Pursel' Cc: 'Yousuf Patanwala'; Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org) Subject: Response Letter to Attorney Carla, Below is the response to Laura Nash's letter to me dated July 17, 2003. Please edit as you see fit, place on City letterhead, and let me know when it's ready to sign. Yousuf/Ray, if you have any edits, please let Carla know. George Laura P. Nash address, etc. Re: Get this info from Laura's letter Dear Ms. Nash, I have read yo)letter to me dated July 17, 2003, and have discussed it with senior staff at the City. We respectfully decline your request for the City to issue a joint check for the undisputed amount of the Stop Notice filed by Olson Precast Company. Sincerely, George Harvilla, P.E. Project Manager Cc: Ray, Yousuf, and Jodie SUITE 3700 O D t�^0 i i i 0 �LIE.i & c`I D E S`i � 2049 CENTURY PARK EAST -p�) �(�` '� �)Lf l�f 1 1 o Los ANGELES,CA 90067-3211 TE • -552-0130 FAX:310-229-5800 knic.com}` ATTORNEYS AT LAW Aga` ' l ����'� E, JUL 2003 y_ : : RECEIVED ;� ;,,Y C! REDEVELOPMENT/ c''' \`.. , _ ,, ./ ,,,,,.._ ,, oz, LAURA P.NASH July 17, 2003 Via Facsimile and U.S.Mail 909/427.9169 Mr. George Harvilla Parsons Brinkerhoff 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, CA 92335 Re: Claim No. : 638 0035114 001 Bond No. : PRF 8548601 Principal : A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. Project : South Highland Ave. & Juniper Ave. Sewer System Improvements, Sp-46-02 Our File No. : 240127.pending Dear Mr. Harvilla: This will acknowledge receipt of your letter dated July 14, 2003 in response to my letter dated July 7, 2003. Would the City of Fontana be willing to issue a joint check for the undisputed amount of the Stop Notice filed by Olson Precast Company? A.D. General Engineering Construction,Inc.has advised that upon receipt of a two party check for$5,586.19 it will sign the check and forward it to Olson Precast Company. A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. is unable to pay this money directly due limited cash flow at the moment. I would appreciate hearing from you regarding this proposal. Very truly yours, ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER& CIRESI L.L.P. Laura P.Nash LPN/ln . cc: Gregory W. Kilburn (via facsimile) Jodie Snyder(via facsimile) 60020111.1 ATLANTAEOSTON LOSANGELES M I N N E A P O L I S • N A P L E S • S A I N T P A U L • W A S H I N G T O N, D. C . Harvilla, George From: Thomas Holliman [tholliman@boyleengineering.com] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 4:49 PM To: Tom Manley Cc: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: S. Highland/Juniper Ave Sewer Imp The agreement on overtime occured when we met to discuss the first round of change order items. At the meeting we discussed the change in the unit price for asphalt when we lowered the tonnage because they didn't replace the full width of Juniper. Tom Original Message From: Tom Manley [mailto:tomm@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 4:47 PM To: Thomas Holliman Cc: 'PB - George Harvilla' Subject: RE: S. Highland/Juniper Ave Sewer Imp Hello Thomas . . . Looks like I might have had a bad address for you . . . . anyway can you review my note below and reply back to George . . . he is trying to complete his final C/O to AD and before he goes out with it wants any background you might have on the OT agreement. . . . Tom Original Message From: Tom Manley [mailto:tomm@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 4:52 PM To: 'Boyle - Tom Holliman' Cc: 'PB - George Harvilla' Subject: S. Highland/Juniper Ave Sewer Imp Hello Thomas . . . I just got done speaking with George Harvilla regarding our final invoice/request for budget increase. George was asking what you might recall regarding the spliting of Ralphs overtime inspection between the City and AD General. Such as, when did the discussion/agreement take place, who was present, was the agreement documented in writing, etc. George is concerned that AD General may become a reluctant participant to this agreement, unless we can satisfactorily refresh their memory. Can you help us out? Have a good weekend, . . . Tom 1 >.f • A.D.General Engineering construction Inc., 2829 N.GimeLLkg RNrl,Gta 1r01111 4 Rur6ank,Ca:41504 • PNana(818)559-7383•Fax(818)559-5502 • FAX COVER SHEET DATE 7/ t �l RS=6 IPIENT. '� ,C-PrAta . PAX# ( ) c=4\0 • 6) PHONE# ( ) r COMPANY . . , • A.D.GENERAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INC. SENDER[ FAX# (818)559-5502 PHONE# (818)559.7383 • MESSAGE NUMBER OF PAGES (WICOVER SHEET) d ZOSS-BSS '000000000000000000DO dt+, co co Si inC Ai General Engineering Construction Inc., ♦♦♦ 2829-N.Glenoaks Blvd.Ste 106/101 •Burbank,Ca 91504 Phone(818)559-7383♦Fax(818)5595502 July 15, 2003 /1/12008 • 49f7jpj City of Fontana Redevelopment/Special Project Department Attn: George Harvilla ='' 8353 Sierra Ave. Fontana, CA 92335 Re: South Highland Ave.Sewer Improvement Project Dear George Harvilla, Your immediate attention and response is required to assure release of retention occurs promptly, without delay. Correspondence was sent to you from our Bonding Company, informing you of the decision that Olson Preacast's filed claim and Stop Notice is invalid. A request was made upon the agency to proceed in a described manner. Your reply is needed immediately. If no such reply is received A.D. General Engineering Construction Inc.,shall presume no exception;is taken.:::Thus a-check for retention,payable to A.D. General is expected Wednesday July 23, 2003. If there is no check A.D. General will consider payment past due and will immediately take step towards seeking compensation for damages and expenses. Sincerely, colt A. Snyder President& CEO A.D. General Engineering Construction Inc., Cc Curtis Ingram Associated.Engineers,'Itay Bragg City:of Fontana,Carla Pursel City.of Fontana 1U.General Engineering Construction Inc, .•. MO N.Glenoakb Blvd_Ste 1O8r1O1 •Burbank,Cd 91t[l4 Phone(810)SB-7 3*Fax(81e)5 0? July 15,2003 City of Fontana Attic: Carla Pursel 8353 Sierra Ave, Fontana, CA 92335 Re: South Highland Ave. Sewer Improvement Project Dear George Harvilla; - Your immediate attention and response is required to assure release of retention occurs promptly, without delay. Correspondence was sent to you from our Bonding Company, informing you of the decision that Olson Preacast's filed claim and Stop Notice is invalid. A request was made upon the agency to proceed in a described manner. Your reply is needed immediately. lino such repl is received A.D. General Engineering Construction Inc., shall presume no exception is taken. Thus a check for retention, payable to A.D. General is expected Wednesday July 23,2003. If there is no check A.D. General will consider payment past due and will immediately take step towards seeking compensation for damages and expenses_ Sincerely, _..4W '• Scott A. Snyder President&CEO A.D. General Engineering Construction Inc_, Cc: Curtis Ingram Associated Engineers,Ray Bragg City of Fontana,Carla Pursol City of Fontana 2 'd 20SS-6SS '00000000000000000000 di{1, tE0. CO SI InC D.D.General-Engineering Construction Inc. ♦♦♦ 2829 N.Glenoaks Blvd.Ste 106/101 •Burbank,Ca 91504 Phone(818)559-7383♦Fax(818)559-5502 • July 15 2003 tee City of Fontana i Redevelopment/Special Project Department Attn: George Harvilla 8353 Sierra Ave. Fontana, CA 92335 Re: South Highland Ave. Sewer Improvement Dear George Harvilla, This letter is to notify you that A.D. General Engineering Construction Inc., contacted Ayala Boring,informing them of California Contract Law stating, "No Stop Notice shall be placed or allowed to remain on file for more than the amount due," Failure to release such an invalid Stop Notice gives the prime contractor the right to file legal suit to obtain compensation for damages plus legal fees. When the agency reached an agreement with Ayala over their claim for Extra Work, Ayala's Stop Notice on file automatically because invalid, since the amount was known to be incorrect. It is the responsibility of the Agency to contact the prime regarding any Stop of Payment Notices, to ascertain if the prime disputes the notice or not. This must be done prior to any action taken by the agency. This matter having now been made known to the agency by A.D. General, lends to our contesting of the Stop Notice Ayala Boring has filed for the amount of$21,639.26. c ely, Jodi Snyder 'ce President A.D. General Engineering Construction Inc., Cc: Curtis Ingram Associated Engineers,Ray Bragg City of Fontana,Carla Pursel City of Fontana Al. General Engineering Construction Inc, 2829 N.CIcnooka Blvd.fete 1 mites:i 8urtmnk,Ga s15r)4 Phorre(01 B)552-7383♦Fax(61e)559-5302 July l 5,2003 City ofFontana Ann: Carla Purser 8353 Sierra Ave. Fontana,CA 92335 Re: South Highland Ave. Sewer Improvement Dear George Idarvilla, This letter is to notify you that A.D. General Engineering Construction Inc., contacted Ayala Boring,informing them of California Contract Law stating,"No Stop Notice shall be placed or allowed to remain on file fur more than the amount due." Failure to release such an invalid Stop Notice gives the prime contractor the right to file legal suit to obtain compensation for damages plus legal fees. When the agency reached an agreement with Ayala over their claim for Extra Work, Ayala's Stop Notice on file automatically because invalid, since the amount was known to be incorrect_ It is the responsibility of the Agency to contact the prime regarding any Stop of Payment Notices, to ascertain if the prime disputes the notice or not. This must be done prior to any action taken by the agency, This matter having now been made known to the agency by A.D. General,lends to our contesting of the Stop Notice Ayala Boring has filed for the amount of S2l,639.26. Sincerely, Jodie Snyder Vice President A.D. General Engineering Construction Inc., Cc: Curtis Ingram Associated Engineers,Ray Bragg City of Fontana.Carla Purser City of Fontana e 'el ZOSS—GSS 00000000000000000000 dI47 •e0 co SI InC • AB.General Engineering Oonstructiion Inc, als18 N.Otcnoaks I.100/101♦Bufbal11t,Ca 91504 Phone(818)559-7383 i Fax(818)56902 July 15,2003 City of Fontana Attn: Carla Pursel 8353 Sierra Ave. Fontana, CA 92335 A'a Dear George H , arvilla, ` You have been sent a Release of Stop Notice fe F� Robertson's Ready Mix for$7,683.69 and Tim Sigman Paving for$4,533.88. If you hay not received these releases please contact AD. • General Engineering Construction Inc., imm iately; This letter's intent is to make sure the agency obtains these releases,thus assuring no delays occur releasing the retention money. Sincerely, I�t -kale Snyder Vice President A.D. General Engineering Construction Inc., Cc:Curtis Ingram Associated Engineers,Ray Bragg City of Fontana,Carla Pursel City of Fontana y •d cross-egg • '00000000000000000000 did =EO co Si iur A.A.General Engineering-Construction Inc., ♦♦♦ 2829 N_.Glenoaks Blvd.Ste 106/101 ♦Burbank,Ca 91504 Phone 818 559-7383•Fax(818)559-5502 �w /r rr. ,.fl 14 July 15, 2003 i Rep 4)0�`(0 rFtOp FD �LiFN,1i City of Fontana `e' Redevelopment/Special Project Manager Attn: George Harvilla 8353 Sierra Ave. Fontana, CA 92335 Dear George Harvilla, You have been sent a Release of Stop Notice from Robertson's.Ready Mix for$7,683.69 and Tim Sigman Paving for$4,533.88. If you have not received these releases please contact A.D. General Engineering Construction Inc., immediately. This letter's intent is to make sure the agency obtains these releases,thus assuring no delays occur releasing the retention money. Sincerely, (---1odie Snyder Vice President A.D. General Engineering Construction Inc., Cc: Curtis Ingram Associated Engineers,Ray Bragg City of Fontana,Carla Pursel City of Fontana A U,General Engineering Construction Inc* tf• 2829 N.CS4maka 9Ivd_Sta llB/1Q0♦Burbank,Gs 91504 Phone(818) '7383 i Fax(818)5E9.5502 July 15, 2003 City of Fontana Attn: Ray Bragg 8353 Sierra Ave, Fontana,CA 92335 •Re: South Highland Ave. Sewer Improvement Project Dear George Harvilla, Your immediate attention and response is required to assure release of retention occurs promptly, without delay. . Correspondence was sent to you from our Bonding Company,informing you of the decision that Olson Preacast's filed claim and Stop Notice is invalid. A request was made upon the agency to proceed in a described manner. Your reply is needed immediately. If no such reply is received A.D. General Engineering Construction Inc., shall presume no exception is taken. Thus a check for retention,payable to A.D. General is expected Wednesday July 23,2003. If there is no check A.D. Genera!will consider payment past due and will immediately take step towards seeking compensation for damages and expenses. Sincerely, L. Scott A. Snyder President&CEO A.D, General Engineering Construction Inc., Cc: Curtis Ingram Associated Engincers,Ray Bragg City of Fontana,Carla Parcel City of Fontana 2 '4 20SS-SSS '00oo0000000000000000 I' 0 co SI Inc General Engineering Construction Inc., 2g120 N.C enoake Blvd.Ste 100M01 •Burbditk,Ca 915o4 Phone($1$)55G.7383♦Fax(818)559.5502 July 15,2003 City of Fontana Attn: Ray Bragg 8353 Sierra Ave, ",K Fontana, CA'92335 ;c Re: .South Highland Ave.Sewer Improvement Dear George Harvilla, This letter is to notify you that AD. General Engineering Construction Inc., contacted Ayala Boring,informing them of California Contract Law stating, No Stop Notice shall be placed or allowed to remain on file lot more than the amount due." Failure to release Such an invalid Stop Notice gives the prime contractor the right to file legal suit to obtain compensation for damages plus legal fees. When the agency reached an agreement with Ayala over their claim for Extra Work,Ayala's Stop Notice on file automatically because invalid, since the amount was known to be incorrect. • It is the responsibility of the Agency to contact the prime regarding any Stop of Payment Notices, to ascertain if the prime disputes the notice or not. This must be done prior to any action taken by the agency. This matter having now been made known to the agency by A.n General,lends to our contesting • of the Stop Notice Ayala Boring has filed for the amount of$21,639.26. Sincerely. �Jti ie Snyder Vice President A.D. General Engineering Construction Lie_, Cc: Curtis Ingram Associated Engineers,Ray Bragg City of Fontana. Carla Purse!City of Fontanft 9 ' 2OSS—GSS '00000000000000000000 d24, tCO Co ST tnt' A.D.General Engineering Conslrucion Inc., ♦♦♦ Z329 N.Glcnoaks Blvd.3tc 108/101 i Bur Dank,C2 91&)4 Phone ale)56'B-7303•Fax(618)559.5502 July 15,2003 City of Fontana Attn: Ray Braggy 8353 Sierra Ave. 11. Fontana,CA 92335 1 i i Dear George Harvilla, You have been sent a Release of Stop Notice from Robertson's Ready Mix for$7,683.69 and Tim Sigman Paving for$4,533.88. If you have not received these releases please contact A.D. General Engineering Construction Inc.,immediately. This letter's intent is to make sure the agency obtains these releases,thus assuring no delays occur releasing the retention money. erejZ J er Vice President AD. General Engineering Construction Inc., Cc:Curtis Ingram Associated Engineers,Ray Bragg City of Fontana,Carla Fursel City of Fontana • L 'd ZOSS-BSS. '00000000000000000000 d2{7tco co ST Int' Harvilla, George From: Tom Manley[tomm@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 5:03 PM To: "Curt Ingraham" Cc: 'April Morris'; Harvilla, George Subject: Final C/O -AD General Hello Curt . . . I had a short phone call with George Harvilla regarding our final invoice/request for budget increase. At the close of the conversation, George asked if I knew anything about the status of the final AD General C/0 that you are suppose to be putting together. It sounded like he has been expecting it for some time and asked that you please expidite it. . . . Tom 1 Harvilla, George From: Tom Manley[tomm@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Friday,July 11, 2003 4:52 PM To: 'Boyle-Tom Holliman' Cc: Harvilla, George Subject: S. Highland/Juniper Ave Sewer Imp Hello Thomas . . . I just got done speaking with George Harvilla regarding our final invoice/request for budget increase. George was asking what you might recall regarding the spliting of Ralphs overtime inspection between the City and AD General. Such as, when did the discussion/agreement take place, who was present, was the agreement documented in writing, etc. George is concerned that AD General may become a reluctant participant to this agreement, unless we can satisfactorily refresh their memory. Can you help us out? Have a good weekend, . . . Tom 1 nn PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF COMPUTATION SHEET Page of =moo Made by 1�- YEARS® • 9/ e- Date 7-/ ° "-? Subject v -- �- r,.-.o Checked by Date x-4-;G1 Y✓,ram I 4/.01 71-Z,/- f�.0 C;747 G..; // A.el, /TU _rT� 6 L� up A�e 4'... o..» �.-• � i74" .�S Y'e- �. 4/„.. (H 44. .its / ski THE CHIT�o "!w� �-- City of Fontana 0,0n1T" <ry "11. = CALIFORNIA 'ClAiiVW40; 4 �`Az cA�l-. 111114, July 14, 2003 Laura P. Nash ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI, LLP 2049 Century Park East, Suite 3700 Los Angeles, California, 90067-3211 • RE: Claim No.: 638 0035114 001 Bond No.: PRF 8548601 Principal: A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. Project: South Highland Avenue & Juniper Avenue Sewer System Improvements, SP-46-02 Your File: 240127.pending Dear Ms. Nash: This is in response to your letter dated July 7, 2003. This is to inform you that City does not make any direct payment to the subcontractor on the project. A.D. General Engineering was awarded the construction contract on the above referenced project and is responsible for payment to their subcontractors. To date, A.D. General Engineering has two outstanding Stop Notices. The city will not release the full balance of the retention to A.D. General Engineering without receiving the releases on the Stop Notices or until A.D. General provides the bonds in accordance with the public contract code. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me at (909) 427-9166. Respectfully, Redevelopment & Special Projects Department 3c7e1-: George Harvilla Project Manager GH:cp c: Raymond Bragg, Redevelopment&Special Projects Director Yousuf Patanwala,Sr.Civil Engineer Jodi Snyder,A. D.General Engineering www.fontana.org 8353 SIERRA AVENUE FONTANA, CALIFORNIA 92335-3528 (909) 350-7600 recycled paper JUL 07 2003 17 : 13 FR R K M & C L.L. P . 310 229 5800 TO 919094279169 P .02 SUITS 3700 2049 CENTURY PAnx EAST ROBINS , KAP LAN, MILLER & C I RE S I i..i_.1! Los ANGELES,CA 90067-1 2 1 1 TEL:310.552-0130 FAK:310-229-. www.rkmc.com ATTORNEYS AT LAW LAURA P.NASH July 7, 2003 Via Facsimile and Mail 909/427.91 69 Mr. George Harvilla Parsons Brinkerhoff 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, CA 92335 Re: Claim No. : 638 0035114 001 Bond No. PRF 8548601 Principal : A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. Project South Highland Ave. & Juniper Ave. Sewer System Improvements, Sp-46-02 Our File No. : 240127.pending Dear Mr. Harvilla: This office has been retained as outside counsel for fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland ("F&D"), the surety which issued the Payment and Performance Bonds for A.D. General Engineering Construction,Inc,in connection with the above-referenced public works project. It is my understanding that your firm was the project manager for the City of Fontana in connection with the project. F&D has been presented with a claim against the Payment Bond by Olson Precast Company in the amount of$19,660.00. The investigation by F&D reveals that the claim is valid only to the extent of$5,586.19 due to faulty work performed by Olson Precast Company, This conclusion is based in part on information furnished by Ralph Roberts,the City's inspector on the project. It is my tmdersta.nding that the City of Fontana intends to release retention on July 23, 2003 and intends to release$19,660.00 to Olson Precast Company based upon a stop notice it filed on the project. Based upon the results of F&D's investigation, on behalf of F&b, I respectfully request that the City of Fontana only release the amount of$5,586,19 to Olson Precast Company in exchange for a partial release of the stop notice. F&D is prepare to defend 60019382,1 L ANT A • S o s T o N r L o s A N G S L fi s I M I N N E A P o L t 5 • N A P L E s • s A 1 k T P w 77 I. - w e c v r eO n T .. JUL 07 2003 17: 13 FR R K M & C L.L. P . 310 229 5800 TO 919094279169 P.03 Mr. George Harville July 7,2003 Page 2 and hold the City of Fontana harmless from any claim by Olson Precast Company for the balance of the stop notice. Please let me hear from you regarding this matter. Very truly yours, ROBINS,KAPLAN, MILLER&CIRESI L.L.P. 044 p rn, 0)61- Laura P. Nash LPN/In cc: Gregory W. Kilburn.(via facsimile) Jodie Snyder(via facsimile) 60019382.1 ** TOTAL PAGE.03 ** JUL 07 2003 17 : 13 FR R K M Ee C L.L . P . 310 229 5800 TO 919094279169 P .01 SUITS 3700 2049 CENTURY PARK EAST ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. Los ANGBI.i?s,CA90067.3211 TEL:310•552.0130 FAX:310-229-5800 www.rkmc.com ATTORNEYS AT LAW FROM: David C.Veis The information contained in this facsimile message is privileged and confidential information intended for the use of the addressee listed below and no one else. If you are not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver this message to the intended recipient,please do not use this transmission in any way,but contact the sender by telephone. DATE: July 7,2003 TO: M . George Harvilla Parsons Brinkerhoff FACSIMILE NO.: (909)427-9169 TELEPHONE NO.: (909) FILE NO.: 240127.pending NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: If transmission problems occur,or you are not the intended recipient,please call (310)552-0130. MESSAGE: Please see attached correspondence. Original: X Mailed l� Not Mailed ATLANTA BOSTON r IAS ANGRY FS I MJNNEAPOLTS NAPLES ORANGE COUNTY SAINT PAUL WASHINGTON, D.C. 60018910.1 FAX moo YEARS PARSONS 16689 Foothill Boulevard BRINCKERHOFF Suite 103 f ' Fontana, CA 92335 909-427-9166 R� ti Fax:909-427-9169 harvilla@pbworld.com To: �� rNS k-, �G�, 9677-6 g/ From: George Harvilla Date: 7 Project No.: Fax No.: No. of Pages (including this page): y Subject: e 7tcc e_oe Comments: Over a Century of Engineering Excellence RESPONSE REQUESTED Page 1 of 1 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Tuesday,July 15, 2003 2:25 PM To: Curt Ingraham (E-mail) Cc: Carla Pursel (E-mail);Tom Holliman (E-mail) Subject: FW: Letter to bond attny Curt, Attached is a draft of a letter the City is going to send to Scott responding to the letter from his attorney. Also, after the City sent Scott the payment to settle the Ayala claim, Scott withheld about$5000 when he made his check out to Ayala. It never seems to end. George Original Message From: Carla Pursel [mailto:cpursel@fontana.org] Sent:Tuesday,July 15, 2003 11:38 AM To: Yousuf Patanwala Cc: Harvilla, George Subject: Letter to bond attny Yousuf- Here's the letter you wanted. Please feel free to make any changes necessary. I put you as the signing person, should it be Ray or George instead????? Let me know. Cp George -please feel free to make any comment/changes too. Carla S. Pursel Administrative Project Coordinator CITY OF FONTANA Redevelopment & Special Projects 909.350.6792 7/16/2003 Harvilla George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday,June 19, 2003 5:29 PM To: 'Carla Pursel' Cc: Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org) Subject: Settlement Agreement With A.D. General Carla, I have made minor modifications to the Settlement Agreement with A. D. General (attached). Please review my revisions, and if you like them, accept them into the document. Then we'll forward to Associated and finally to A. D. General. Call me if you have any questions. Thanks, George #654069.doc(33 KB) SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE between THE CITY OF FONTANA a California municipal corporation and A.D. GENERAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION,INC. a California corporation [Dated as of June 170 2003 for reference purposes only] --- {Deleted: ARTICLE 1.PARTIES AND EFFECTIVE DATE 1.1 Parties. This Settlement Agreement and General Release ("Agreement") is entered into by andpetween(i)the City of Fontana,a California municipal corporation("City") -{Deleted: and (ii) A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc., a California corporation ("A.D. General"). City and A.D. General are sometimes referred to herein individually as "Party" and collectively as "Parties." 1.2 Date of Reference. This Agreement,is dated as of June 17, 2003 for reference _-- Deleted: purposes only. This Agreement shall not become effective until the "Effective Date" as defined -{Deleted: in Section 1.3.' f Deleted: 1.3 Effective Date. This Agreement will not become effective until the date _---{Deleted: ("Effective Date") that this Agreement has been executed by the appropriate authorities of the ---[Deleted: City and A.D.General. ARTICLE 2.RECITALS 2.1 A.D. General and the City entered into that certain contract entitled "Construction of South Highland Avenue and juniper Avenue Sewer System Improvements,"dated June 20,200;("Contract")which,as more particularly described in the --I Deleted:[insert title of contract] Contract, provided for A.D. General's installation of a sewer line on Walnut Street. Juniper -f Deleted: Avenue.and South Highland Avenue,("Project"). _.._ (Deleted:_ Deleted: [insert description of public 1 2.2 A.D. General alleges, and the City denies, that the City is obligated to pay A.D. works project and general location] General no less than the sum of Thirteen Thousand One Hundred Ninety Four Dollars and Ninety Cents ($13,194.90) for alleged additional work performed pursuant to the Contract and for other damages incurred by A.D. General during the performance of the Contract. The foregoing allegation is hereinafter referred to as the"Dispute." 2.3 By execution of this Agreement, the City and A.D. General desire to settle, once and for all, any and all claims which A.D. General may have against the City arising under or related to the Contract, including, without implied limitation, the Dispute, whether such claims are known or unknown, foreseeable or unforeseeable, past, present or future. A.D. General acknowledges that it may have suffered costs, expenses or damages of which it is not aware,but that it nonetheless intends to effect a full and complete settlement of such known and unknown claims. For purposes of this Agreement,the term "Released Matters" includes the Dispute and any other past,present or future,known or unknown,claim, cause of action, demand or liability related to or any way arising from or related to the Contract. The term"Released Matters"does not include any breach of this Agreement. 'All further section,article,and exhibit references shall be to the sections,articles and exhibits of this Agreement unless otherwise noted. RVPUB\KKR\654069 Draft 6/13/03 2 ARTICLE 3. 3.1 No Effect Upon Contract. Other than for the matters described in Sections 3.2 and 3.3 of this Release, the conditions and provisions of this Release shall not be deemed or operate to amend, modify or abridge the Parties' respective rights and obligations under the Contract which,but for the matters expressly set forth herein, shall continue to be applicable and enforceable in accordance with its terms. 3.2 City's Obligations. 3.2.1 Settlement Payment. In consideration of A.D. General's general waiver I and release of all claims as provided in Section 3.3, the City shall, within,thirty (30)_days - --(Deleted:fifteen 1 following the Effective Date, pay to A.D. General the sum of Eight Thousand Three Hundred '`-(Deleted:15 Twenty Five Dollars and Seventy Nine Cents ($8,325.79) ("Settlement Payment") as full and final payment for any and all claims which A.D. General may have against the City in connection with or related to the Contract and/or the Project and any work performed in connection therewith,whether such claims are known or unknown,foreseeable or unforeseeable, past,present,or future. 3.2.2 Retention Funds Release. Subject to the City Council's acceptance of the Project on June 17,2003,and within thirty-five(35)days thereafter,the City shall release all or a part of the retention funds it holds pursuant to the Contract to A.D. General. The amount of_-_- {Deleted:of retention retention funds actually released will be determined by the status of any and all stop notices filed against the Project as of the date the funds are to be released. The City shall release all retention funds to A.D. General, less any amounts required to satisfy any stop notices filed and not released prior to such payment. 3.3 Release. For and in consideration of the City's obligations under Section 3.2, A.D. General hereby releases, waives and discharges the City and its respective officers, officials, employees, agents, volunteers, contractors and attorneys from any and all alleged and actual claims, damages, remedies, causes of action, demands, and,ether liabilities (collectively, Deleted: ] "Liabilities") arising out of or in any way related to the Released Matters. The foregoing release and waiver applies to all Liabilities,whether retrospective,current,or prospective,known or unknown,foreseeable or unforeseeable. 3.3.1 Civil Code Section 1524 Waiver. A.D. General acknowledges that it is familiar with the provisions of California Civil Code Section 1542,which provides "A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release,which if known by him must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor." RVPUB\KKR\654069 Draft 6/13/03 3 A.D. General acknowledges that it may have sustained damages, losses, costs or expenses that are presently unknown and unsuspected. Nevertheless, A.D. General • I acknowledges that this Agreement has been negotiated and agreed upon in light of this situation, _ _-.{-Deleted: and,to the extent of the release set forth in Section 3.3 hereby expressly waives all rights which it has under California Civil Code Section 1542 or any other statute or common law principle of similar effect. 3.3.2 Release Does Not Extend to Obligations Under this Agreement. The release provided in this Section 3.3.2 do not extend to breaches of the City's obligations arising under this Agreement. 3.4 Advice of Legal Counsel. Each of the Parties acknowledges that it is freely and voluntarily entering into this Agreement and that it has been afforded the opportunity to obtain the advice of legal counsel of its choice with regard to this Agreement. Each of the Parties further acknowledges that it understands this Agreement in its entirety. 3.5 No Admission. By entering into this Agreement, none of the Parties are admitting or acknowledging liability or responsibility for any of the other Parties to this Agreement or other Parties to the Dispute. 3.6 Authority to Sign. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Parties warrant and represent that they have full authority to sign and thereby bind their respective Parties to this Agreement and all respective heirs,personal representatives,successors and assigns. 3.7 Integration;Counterparts. This Agreement is the entire agreement between the Parties concerning the settlement of the Dispute and replaces any prior negotiation, discussions or agreements between the Parties. None of the Parties are relying upon any representation or agreements in connection with the Dispute. This Agreement nay be executed in'duplicate __-•L.Deleted: originals, each of which is deemed to be an original, but when taken together,_shall constitute __ {Deleted:, shall j one and the same instrument.This is a fully integrated Agreement 3.8 Non-liability of City Officials/Employees. No board member, official, contractor, consultant, attorney or employee of the City shall be personally liable to A.D. General,or to their successors or assignees,in the event of any default or breach by the City, or for any amount which may become due to A.D.General or to their successors or assignees,or on any obligations arising under this Agreement. 3.9 Venue. Any legal action or proceeding concerning this Agreement shall be filed and prosecuted in the appropriate California state court in the County of San Bernardino, California. Each Party hereto irrevocably consents to the personal jurisdiction of that court. The I City and A.D. General each hereby expressly waive_the benefit of any provision of federal or -..-- Deleted: j RVPUB\1=1654069 Draft 6/13/03 4 state law or judicial decision providing for the filing,removal, or change of venue to any other court or jurisdiction, including, without implied limitation, federal district court, due to any diversity of citizenship between the City and A.D. General, due to the fact that the City is a party to such action or proceeding or due to the fact that a federal question or federal right is involved or alleged to be involved. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing,the City and A.D. General specifically waive any rights provided to them pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 394. A.D. General acknowledges that the provisions of this Section 3.9 are material consideration to the pity for their entry into this Agreement, in that the City will avoid _ -- Deleted:City for the potential cost,expense and inconvenience of litigating in a distant forum. 3.10 No Interpretation Against Drafter. The City and A.D. General acknowledge that this Agreement,is the_product of mutual arms-length negotiation and drafting and that each _ --{Deleted: J Party has been represented by legal counsel in the negotiation and drafting of this Agreement. Accordingly, the rule of construction which provides the ambiguities in a document shall be construed against the drafter of that document shall have no application to the interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement. In any action or proceeding to interpret or enforce this Agreement,the finder of fact may refer to such extrinsic evidence not in direct conflict with any specific provision of this Agreement to determine and give effect to the intention of the parties hereto. 3.11 Governing Law. This Release shall be interpreted in accordance with California statutes and decisional law,without regard to conflict of laws principles. 3.12 Amendment to this Agreement. Neither Party shall have the right to unilaterally terminate,modify or abridge any of their respective rights or obligations under this Agreement. Any amendment to this Agreement must be in writing executed by all Parties hereto. 3.13 No Waiver. Failure to insist on any one occasion upon strict compliance with any of the covenants or conditions hereof shall not be deemed a waiver of such term,covenant or condition, nor shall any waiver or relinquishment of any rights or powers hereunder at any one time or more times be deemed a waiver or relinquishment of such other right or power at any other time or times. 3.14 No Third Party Beneficiaries. The Parties acknowledge that there are no express or implied third party beneficiaries to this Agreement. No person or entity not a signatory hereto shall have any rights or causes of action against any Party hereto as a result of that Party's performance or nonperformance of any obligation hereunder. 3.15 Attorneys' Fees.In the event of the bringing of an arbitration,action or suit by a Party hereto against another Party hereunder by reason of any breach of any of the covenants or agreements or any intentional inaccuracies in any of the representations and warranties on the part of the other Party arising out of this Agreement or any other dispute between the Parties concerning this Agreement, then, in that event, the prevailing Party in such action or dispute, RVPUB\KKR\654069 Draft 6/13/03 5 whether by final judgment or arbitration award,shall be entitled to have and recover of and from the other Party all costs and expenses of suit or claim, including actual attorneys' fees. Any judgment, order or award entered in any final judgment or award shall contain a specific provision providing for the recovery of all costs and expenses of suit or claim,including actual attorneys' fees (collectively, "Costs") incurred in enforcing, perfecting and executing such judgment or award. For the purposes of this Section 3.15, Costs shall include, without implied limitation, attorneys' and experts' fees, costs and expenses incurred in the following: (i) post judgment motions and appeals, (ii)contempt proceedings, (iii) garnishment, levy and debtor and third party examination; (iv) discovery; and (v) bankruptcy litigation. This Section 3.15 shall survive any termination of this Agreement. 3.16 No Prior Assignments. A.D.General hereby represents and warrants to the other that they have not, prior to the date of this Agreement, assigned, transferred, pledged, hypothecated or conveyed any right or interest they may have in this Agreement to any person or entity not a signatory hereto. Neither Party has made any transfer, pledge, conveyance, assignment or hypothecation of any claim or chose in action(whether or not such claim or chose in action is the subject of this Agreement) which they may have or claim to have against the other Party. A.D. General shall each defend,indemnify and hold the other Parties harmless from and against all damages, costs, expenses, liabilities, penalties, forfeitures,judgments, attorneys' fees,expert witness fees, or amounts paid in settlement which are in any way related to or arise of that Party's breach of the foregoing representation and warranty. 3.17 Each Party to Bear Their Own Costs. Except as may be provided by Section 3.15, the City and A.D. General shall each bear their own respective legal expenses and costs incurred in the preparation and review of this Agreement. [Signatures on Following Pages] RVPUB\KKR\654069 Draft 6/13/03 6 SIGNATURE PAGE TO SETTLEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE "CITY" CITY OF FONTANA a California municipal corporation Dated: By: Kenneth R.Hunt City Manager ATTEST: By: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: BEST BEST&KRIEGER LLP By: City Attorney RVPUB\KKR\654069 Draft 6/13/03 7 SIGNATURE PAGE TO SETTLEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE "A.D.GENERAL" A.D.GENERAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION,INC.,a California corporation Dated: By: Its: RVPUB\ICKR\654069 Draft 6/13/03 07 11l2003 16:33 9099410891 PAGE 02/03 Associated Engineers, Inc. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 3311 E.SHELBY STREET,ONTARIO,CA 91764-4972 (909)980-1982 FAX(909)941-0891 1, June 19, 2003 A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 1061101 Burbank, CA 91504 Attn: Scott A_ Snyder Scott: This letter is to notify you that the South Highland Sewer Project has been accepted as complete by the City Council on June 17, 2003. In accordance with City policy,the project Notice of Completion has been filed_ Subject to California law, AD General has 35 days from June 18 to settle all outstanding Stop Notices on the project Currently,these notices are as follows: Ayala Boring: $21,639.26 Olson Precast Co.: 19,660.00 Pet— Robertson's Ready Mix: 7,683,69 Tim Sigman Paving,Rental: 4,533.84 TOTAL: $53,51 8.83 Any outstanding notices will be funded by the City prior to the release of remaining funds to A.D. General. If you have any questions, please call me at 980-1982. Sincerely, ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS, INC. C Curt Ingraham C. Curt Ingraham, RCE Vice President JN.01-84 PLANNING DESIGNING SURVEYING 07E11/2003 16:33 9099410891 PAGE 03/03 Cc: RBragg CPursel GHarvilla PLANNING DESIGNING SURVEYING 07111f2003 16:33 9099410891 PAGE 01/03 JOB NO. TELEFAX TELEFAX TELEFAX TELEFAX k ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS, 1NC. Consulting Civil Engineering 3311 East Shelby Street Ontario, CA 91764 (909) 980-1982 if FAX (909) 941-0891 TO: 6; e...._,,. LcLc J i 1 0._ FIRM: FROM: 1-016A_Ma"te-,--1.,...___.....----___ DATE: _7 — I i -a TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES (including cover sheet) 5 COMMENTS: e to- e_ -- ere l t)L r -4-e‘4-- 1 - 1 e ' C}f:)(--- FAX NUMBER: c'/ka 5 .. ORIGINAL SENT VIA MAIL YES NO • kAssociated Engineers, Inc. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 3311 E.SHELBY STREET,ONTARIO,CA 91764-4872 (909)980-1982 FAX(909)941-0891 I June 19,2003 A. __--{Formatted:Font:11 pt A D,General Engineering Construction,Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 Attn: Scott A.Snyder Scott: _---(Deleted:Gentlemen This letter is to in notifkyou that the South Hic_hland Sewer Protect has been accepted as _-•{Deleted:'cation complete by the City Council on June 17,2003. In accordance with City policy,the project Notice of Completion has been filed. Subject to California law,AD General has 35 days from June 18 to settle all outstanding Stop_____--(Deleted:s Notices on the protect. Currently,these notices are as follows: ---(Deleted:n Ayala Boring: $21,639.26 Olson Precast Co.: 19,660.00 Robertson's Ready Mix: 7,683.69 Tim Sigman Paving/Rental: 4,533.88 TOTAL: $53,516.83 I Any outstanding notices will be funded by the City prior to the release of remaining funds to AD_ General. I If you have any questions,please call Curt Ingraham at 980-1982, Sincerely, ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS, INC. C Curt Ingraham C.Curt Ingraham, RCE Vice President JN.01-64 PLANNING DESIGNING SURVEYING Cc: RBragq CPursel GHarvilla PLANNING DESIGNING SURVEYING Harvilla, George I . From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 4:51 PM To: 'scoff@adgenengr.com' Cc: 'Ray Bragg': 'Carla Pursel'; 'Curt Ingraham' Subject: Payment to Olson Precast Scott/Jodie, I received your fax dated June 18, 2003 requesting the City make a payment to Olson Precast in the amount of$5,586.19 out of the retention amount. The City cannot make this payment since the City does not have a contract with Olson Precast. The City's contract is with A. D. General, and therefore can only make payments directly to A.D. General. Sincerely, George Harvilla Consultant Project Manger Jun 18 03 02: 52p 00000000000000000000. 559-5502 p. 2 A.D.General Engineering Construction Inc, ♦•+ 2a29 N.GIcnooka Blvd.ere 106/10-I ♦Burbank.Ca 91504 Phone(818)55 3.7383«Pax(818)559.8932 June 18, 2003 City of Fontana Attn: Gcurge Harvilta 8353 Sierra Ave. Fontana, CA 92335 Dear George Hai villa, Per our Bonding Company's request, A.D. General is asking that Olson Precast be paid $ 5,586.19,which is the undisputed portion that is owed to Olson. Please pay this out of the retention that is being held by the city. If you need additional information you can reach Gregory W. Kilburn with Zurich North America at (800) 670-7177 Ext. 5, Claim No. 638-0035114-001. Sine e , ie Snyder Vice President A.D. General Engineering Construction Inc., Jun 18 03 02: 52p 00000000000000000000. 559-5502 p. 1 A.D.General Engineering Construction Inc., ♦♦♦ 2829 N.Glehnakg BNd.Ste 1061101 ♦BuItrenk,Ca 9Th 34 Phone(818)559-7283•Fax(818)5SSQ2 FA.COVER SIIPPT DATE l0 - + R1CIPIENT C_ 4 (Zr l' t k FAX# ( ) ""if' - 607 PHONE# ( ) COMPANY 5/bit_16VIAAI A,D.GENERAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INC. SENDEK 1-AX# (S18)559-5502 PHONE# (818)559-7383 MESSAGE NUMBER OF PAGES(W/COVER SHEET) • Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday,June 05, 2003 6:29 PM To: 'Carla Pursel' Subject: Information from City Attorney Carla, In the second paragraph of the May 28th letter from the City Attorney to A.D. General, Kevin wants Scott to sign several waivers. Can you ask Kevin to begin to draft these waivers so Scott can sign them at the same time he signs Change Order No. 4? Thanks, George A. D. General Accepts City Offer Page 1 of 2 Harvilla, George From: Thomas Holliman [tholliman @ boyleengineering.com] Sent: Friday,June 06, 2003 4:07 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: A. D. General Accepts City Offer Sounds right, the sewer has not been put into operation so warranty should start on acceptance date. Tom Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Thursday,June 05, 2003 4:34 PM To: curti@assoc-eng.com Cc: rbragg@fontana.org; cpursel@fontana.org;Thomas Holliman; Rsandoval@fontana.org; Yousuf Patanwala Subject: A. D. General Accepts City Offer Curt, A.D. General has accepted the City's offer to settle the outstanding claims for the amount of$8,325.79. I will fax you a copy of their letter of acceptance. In the letter, they say they want to discuss the one-year warranty. In a previous e-mail to me, Scott raised the issue about when the warranty actually starts. He said that due to the delays in settling the claims,the warranty period should be retroactive to an earlier(unspecified) date. In the Green Book, Section 9-3.1, it says, 'Warranty periods shall not be affected by any payment, but shall commence on the date equipment or material is placed into service at the direction of the Agency. In the event such items are not placed into service prior to partial or final acceptance of the project,warranty periods will commence on the date of such acceptance." The sewer has not yet been placed into service. So,the way I interpret this,the warranty period would begin on June 17, 2003,when the Council is scheduled to accept the project. Do you know of any other sections in the specifications, Green Book, or other sources that address this issue? This is what still needs to be done: - Council accepts the project on June 17 and Notice of Completion is filed. -35 day period begins for A.D. General to settle any Stop Notices -Associated issues Change Order No. 4 and A. D. General signs it. They also sign a general waiver, including Civil Code 1542, per City Attorney's letter dated May 28, 2000. -35 days after June 17 (July 22), issue Progress Payment No. 5,which includes Change Order No.4, and the retention, minus any outstanding Stop Notices. 6/9/2003 A. Q. General Accepts City Offer Page 2 of 2 4 - Release Payment Bond Please begin to prepare Change Order No. 4. This change order should include Ralph's overtime (split between Associated and A.D. General), as well as the settlement offer for the five claims. Curt/Tom, let me know if I've overlooked anything. Thanks, George 6/9/2003 JUN-04-2003 16:42 BEST BEST 2, KRIEGER LLP 909 682 1832 .P.02 ID.General Engineerlog Censtrucd®n Inc, ••• 2$29 N_Glen:aka BNd_SYv 10S 1O1 ♦Burbank,Ca 91SD4 Phalle(6113)589.7383 Fait(816)559.5E02 June 04, 2003 Best Best&Krieger LLP P.O. Box 1028 Riverside, CA 92502 Dear Mr_ Kevin Randolph, AD. General Engineering Construction Inc, would just like to confirm that you received our voice mail. Yes, we will accept the settlement offered by the'City for$`8;325.79; however,wo still need to discuss the One Year Warranty. Please contact us to let us know that you have received this letter. • • Sincerely, • Judie Snyder 'Vice President AD, General Engineering Construction inc_, • • 2 ' 20SS-655 ' 00000000000000000000 EO �0 unc • FAX • moo YEARS PARSONS 16689 Foothill Boulevard BRfNCKERHOFF Suite 103 Fontana,CA 92335 is" t ;. 909-427-9166i Fax:909-427-9769 harvilla@pbworld.com To: From: George Harvilla £ c r T .4 e'a liJ�.n Date: - ` 0 1 Project No.: Fax No.: qql _ 0 p Cj No. of Pages (including this page): 3 Subject: r0 i„ �L�h Q�^.c . (O rr`etdon do., Ce 1' Comments: / c r^ Zr" C v.. / ...' ,y . J,c t r.► P— r 6./ Cr /. o , • y7- �'*-v) !/��,'J-� � G l G {!/�/ C N c` � � � PY)G .) _ V' r-tom.✓1 Over a Century of Engineering Excellence RESPONSE REQUESTED __ J • BEST BEST b, KRIEGER LLP A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORAL IONS INDIAN WELLS LAWYERS SAN DIEGO (760) 568-26 i I 3750 UNIVERSITY AVENUE (6 19) 525-1300 POST OFFICE BOX 1028 ONTARIO RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502-1028 ORANGE COUNTY (909) 989-8584 (909) 686-1 450 (949) 260-0962 (909) 686-3083 FAX BBKLAW.COM SACRAMENTO (9 I 6) 325-4000 KEVIN K. RANDOLPH May 28, 2003 CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT COMMUNICATION-SUBJECT TO EVIDENCE CODE SECTION 1152 Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 Re: South Highland and Jumper Avenue Sewer Improvements Dear Mr. Snyder: Best Best & Krieger LLP provides.City Attorney services for the City of Fontana ' ("City"). The City has provided me with letters and other information concerning A.D. General's claims against the City regarding the South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvement Project. Upon review of these documents and discussions with the City staff and consultants, I set forth below the City's response to your claim for payment for alleged additional work performed and for the release of retention funds. The City has previously offered to pay you $3,325.79 of the $13,194.90 claim amount, which offer you rejected. That amount did not include the Ayala claim, which has been settled. Although the City does not believe any additional payment.of any amount is due, in the interest of a prompt resolution and the avoidance of unnecessary expense, the City is open to resolving this dispute through settlement. Without waiving any of the legal rights, claims or defenses the City has or may have (including the defense that A.D. General has failed to timely prosecute its claim)and without making any admission,the City offers to pay A.D. General the sum of Eight Thousand. Three Hundred Twenty-Five and 79/100 Dollars ($8,325.79) (inclusive of the $3,325.79 previously offered) in exchange for a signed general waiver and release of all claims for additional work, including a waiver of Civil Code section 1542. This all-inclusive offer represents a compromise on behalf of the City,given that my review of the facts indicates A.D. General would at most be entitled to receive half this amount,if anything at all,should it choose to pursue its claims through litigation. RVPUB\KKR\653340 LAW OFFICES OF BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP May 28.,.2003 Page 2 Second, City staff will recommend that the City Council accept the subject improvements cm June 17, 2003 and within thirty-five (35) days thereafter release retention funds to A.D. General. The amount of retention funds actually released will be determined by the status of any and all stop notices filed against the project as of the date the funds are to be released. If A.D. . General provides the City with releases executed by those entities that filed stop notices against this ,project,the City will release the full amount.of retention.funds. Otherwise,the City will release the retention funds less the statutorily required amount to satisfythe stop notices.. Please respond to this letter no later than 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday,June 5,2003. If I do not hear from you before then,I will assume you have rejected the City's proposal and this offer will be automatically withdrawn. If you decide to accept the City's proposed resolution, I will prepare and-forward to you all paperwork necessary for the full and final resolution of this matter. Nothing in this letter shall be construed as a waiver of anyrights,claims,or defense that the-City has or may have against A.D. General. If you have any questions, or wish to discuss this matter further, , please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Kevi K. R do ph t - of .ST BPS & K .G R LLP KKR k S <x-: Kenneth R. Hunt, City Manager Ray Bragg, Redevelopment Director • Clark H. Alsop, City Attorney • RVPUB\KKR\653340 l Harvilla,George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 3:00 PM To: 'scott@adgenengr.com' - Cc: 'Curt Ingraham' Subject: Response Letter From City Scott, The City's response letter regarding the non-Ayala claims was mailed to you yesterday, May 28. George May 22,2003 CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT DRAFT COMMUNICATION-SUBJECT TO EVIDENCE CODE SECTION 1152 Mr.Scott Snyder A.D.General Engineering Construction,Inc. ( 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. rr e Suite 106/101 l� S vl°' L3 Burbank,CA 91504 C"f4 Re: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements Dear Mr.Snyder: Best Best&Krieger LLP provides City Attorney services for the City of Fontana ('City'). Thegity has provided me with letters and other information concerning A.D.General's ----(Deleted:City has claims against the City regarding the South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvement Project. Upon review of these documents and discussions with the City staff and consultants,I set forth below the City's response to your claim for payment for alleged additional work performed and for the release of retention funds. the City has previously offered topayyou$3,325.79 of the$13.194.90 claim ---- Deleted:First,please be advised that amount,which you rejected. This amount does not include the Ayala claim,which has been the City disputes and disagrees with your claim that you are owed payment for settled. In the interest of a prompt resolution and the avoidance of unnecessary expense, additional work performed. however,the City is open to resolving this dispute through settlement. Without waiving any of the legal rights,claims or defenses the City has or may have, (including the defense that A.D. General has failed to timely prosecute its claim)and without making any admission,the City offers to pay A.D.General the sum of Five Thousand Dollars($5,000)in exchange for a signed general waiver and release of all claims for additional work,including a waiver of Civil Code section 1542.This amount is in addition to the$3,325.79 previously offered. This offer represents a compromise on behalf of the City,given that my review of the facts indicates A.D. General would at most be entitled to receive half this amount,if anything at all,should it choose to pursue its claims through litigation. Second,City staff will recommend that the City Council accept the subject improvements on June 3,2003 and within thirty-five(3_5. days thereafter release retention funds ---{Deleted: to A.D.General. The amount of retention funds actually released will be determined by the -'-�Deleted:0 status of any and all stop notices filed against the project as of the date the funds are to be released. If A.D.General provides the City with releases executed by those entities that filed stop notices against this project,the City will release the full amount of retention funds. Otherwise,the City will release the retention funds less the statutorily required amount to satisfy the stop notices. Please respond to this letter no later that Monday June 3,2003. If you decide to accept the City's proposed resolution,I will prepare and forward to you all paperwork necessary for the full and final resolution of this matter. Nothing in this letter shall be construed as a waiver of any rights,claims,or defense that the City has or may have against A.D.General. If May 22,2003 Page 3 you have any questions,or wish to discuss this matter further,please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Kevin K.Randolph of BEST BEST&KRIEGER LLP KKR/tjo cc: Kenneth R.Hunt,City Manager Ray Bragg,Redevelopment Director Clark H.Alsop,City Attorney RVPUB\KKR\653340 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 1:27 PM To: 'scott@adgenengr.com' Cc: Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org) Subject: Fax Importance: High Scott, I just faxed you the Ayala claim. Please sign and fax back. Thank you, George Harvilla FAX • =moo YEARS PARSONS 16689 Foothill Boulevard BRlNCKERHOFF Suite 103 Fontana,CA 92335 909-427-9166 Fax:909-427-9169 harvilla@pbworld.com To: From: George Harvilla so s�,, Date: r 'Z /- O 7 Project No.: Fax No.: o'fl„ No. of Pages (including this page): Subject: Ay /4 C fi IfbH. /.n1 /1" C)v C'r X eG Comments: ,Sea f¢/ /°A.a.re Ar A C/(''' • • Over a Century of Engineering Excellence RESPONSE REQUESTED , ' A y� Change Order No. 3 Client Name: City of Fontana Job Name: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements Job Number: SP-46-02 P.O./W.O.. No.: 03-6P001 Pay Period: Final Prepared by: C. Curt Ingraham Date Prepared: May 16,2003 Change Bid Revised Current In Unit Net Contract Working Item Description Quantity Quantity Quantity Unit Price Change Days 1 Clearing and Grubbing, and Mobilization 1 1 - LS $10,000.00 $ - 2 Traffic Control, Signing and Striping 1 1 LS $10,000.00 $ - 3 10" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer(C700) 4,515 4,515 - LF $ 52.00 $ - 4 8" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer(C7W) 254 254 - LF $ 55.00 $ - 5 10" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer(C1208) 142 142 - LF $ 70.00 $ - 6 8" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe 63 63 - LF $ 65.00 $ - 7 4" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer Lateral per City of Fontana Std. Detail No. 125 80 80 - LF $ 50.00 $ - 8 6" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer Lateral per City of Fontana Std. Detail No. 125 249 249 - LF $ 50.00 $ - 9 8" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer Lateral per City of Fontana Std. Detail No. 125 35 35 - LF $ 50.00 $ - 10 Sewer Manhole per City of Fontana Std. Detail No. 112, Modified to 5' Diameter Manhole 4 4 - EA $ 6,500.00 $ - 11 Sewer Manhole per City of Fontana Std. Detail No. 112, Modified to 4' Diameter Manhole 11 11 - EA $ 3,800.00 $ - Connection to Existing Sewer Manhole at Walnut& 12 Cypress inclding Manhole Base Reconstruction and Related Work 1 1 - EA $ 1,700.00 $ - 13 Remove existing asphalt 9,774 9,774 - SF $ 0.10 $ - 14 Asphalt Concrete Pavement - - - TONS $ 37.00 $ - Page 1 of 2 Change ` Bid Revised Current In Unit Net Contract Working Item Description Quantity Quantity Quantity Unit Price Change Days Construct Microtunneling, complete with 36" steel 15 casing,jacking pits, receiving pit, redwood skids, etc. ./2,75-0.// G. H' all per details. Negotiated Price $ 42 52S:6T 3 Construct Microtunneling, complet with 18" steel 16 casing,jacking pits, receieving pit, redwood skids, etc. all per details. 63.0 63.0 - LF $ 260.00 $ - - 17 Potholing existing utilities 25 25 - EA $ 25.00 $ - 18 Install asphalt overlay 1 1 - LS $42,150.00 $ - 19 Asphalt Concrete Pavement 745 745 - TONS $ 41.00 $ - TOTAL ADJUSTMENT TO CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 1-27523:63-j + 4'days PROJECT SUMMARY: ii Z,7s�a'il c,H. TOTAL AMOUNT OF CONTRACT: (thru C.O. #2): $ 494,762.35 TOTAL ADJUSTMENT TO CONTRACT AMOUNT(C.O. #3): $ --2,523 63 /Z17 °•// REVISED CONTRACT TOTAL AMOUNT: $ 507, p2. '•f 6 TOTAL NUMBER OF DAYS TO COMPLETE THE WORK (thru C.O. # : - 6. �?'J (,G A3 Working days G N. TOTAL ADJUSTMENT TO TIME TO COMPLETE:KC O. #3) 3 ' Working days REVISED CONTRACT TIME TO COMPLETE: 69 hfr-B6 Working days REVISED COMPLETION DATE: /4'.9'Oct-02 G H. NOTES: C.O.# 1 Change Order No.changed quantities in bid items 1,3,4,5 and 7,adding$172,980.09 to total contract amount and added 21 working days. Revised completion date January 15,2003. 2 Change Order No.2 changed the quantities in bid items 3,4,5,6,8,10,11,13,15,&17,deleted bid item 14,added bid item 19, and added 24 working days to the time to complete the project due to delays caused by underground utility interferences. 3 Change Order No.3 included a final payment of$11-556:-I-t to Ayala Boring and$1,200.00 to AD for overhead ,., ( � Poe 2 C. Ve • a d,.�v_.•./ / o� .''d;A', C.,1-J. n,3 L 7.67 Prepared by: 7-Z;(7.- Date: C�G ?l" (Associated Engineers) Prepared by: Date: (Associated Engineers) Approved by: Date: (A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc.) Approved by: Date: (City of Fontana) kLETTER OF TRANSMITTAL ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS, Inc. 3311 E. SHELBY STREET ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA 91764-4872 (909) 980-1982 FAX (909) 941-0891 To: P.B. Date: 05/19/03 16689 Foothill Blvd. Project: Sewer Improvements Suite 103 Project No: 03-014 Fontana, CA Attention: George Harvilla VIA: U. S. Mail UPS AE Delivery IN Other Copies Date No Description 3 Change Order No. 3 South Highland and Juniper Ave. Sewer Improvements This is sent: For Approval Per Your Request For Your Information For Your Review and Comment For Your Use For Signature Remarks: By: Jim lmbiorski / dl x Copy - file Copy - Copy- i . FAX too YEARS PARSONS 16689 Foothill Boulevard BRlNCKERHOFF Suite 103 Fontana, CA 92335 909-427-9166 Fax:909-427-9169 harviila@pbworld.com To: �- From: George Harvilla /0... /j'lu /1r.isn Date: /� C���'�ceps- 5 f- bJ Project No.: Fax No.: 9 y y . 7 z -. 7/ y z No. of Pages (including this page): 7 Subject: C , O• #2 Comments: / 67- . • �6w 15. f I C Over a Century of Engineering Excellence RESPONSE REQUESTED 05/1 y9/2003 15:30 FAX Cj 001 ***x*****: *************: ** *** ACTIVITY REPORT *** **Y:*:1:*'****:i:$::a::$*:j::'n*********:$ ST. TIME CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID NO. MODE PGS. RESULT 05/01 09:30 8891884 0118 TRANSMIT ECM 2 OK 00'24 05/01 09:32 17149734918 0119 TRANSMIT ECM 2 OK 00'28 05/01 16:18 17146654501 HALL & FOREMAN I 0120 TRANSMIT ECM 2 OK 00'28 05/02 12:39 5320 AUTO RX G3 0 NG 00'46 O #005 05/06 10:39 18132819567 0121 TRANSMIT ECM 2 OK 00'21 05/06 12:01 559 5502 5321 MEMORY RI ECM 2 OK 00'38 05/06 16:17 714 665 4501 HALL & FOREMAN I 5322 AUTO RX ECM 4 OK 01'41 05/06 17:39 5323 AUTO RX G3 0 NG 00'48 0 #005 05/07 11:27 9410891 0122 TRANSMIT ECM 3 OK 00'18 05/08 12:24 17145681501 0123 TRANSMIT ECM 4 OK 00'39 05/10 18:22 5324 AUTO RX G3 0 NG 00'46 0 #005 05/12 18:44 5325 AUTO RX G3 0 NG 00'51 0 #005 05/13 08:28 714 665 4501 HALL & FOREMAN I 5326 AUTO RX ECM 3 OK 01'20 05/13 15:59 5327 AUTO RX G3 0 NG 00'44 O #005 05/13 17:02 5328 AUTO RI G3 0 NG 00'45 O #005 05/14 15:18 8891884 0124 TRANSMIT ECM 2 OK 00'24 05/14 15:19 17149734918 0125 TRANSMIT ECM 2 OK 00'27 05/16 10:51 5329 AUTO RX G3 0 NG 00'44 0 #005 05/17 15:39 5330 AUTO RX G3 0 NG 00'48 0 #005 05/19 15:30 19497217142 0126 TRANSMIT ECM 3 OK 00'30 Change Order No. 3 • Client Name: City of Fontana Job Name: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements Job Number: SP-46-02 P.O./W.O.. No.: 03-6P001 Pay Period: Final Prepared by: C. Curt Ingraham Date Prepared: May 16, 2003 Change Bid Revised Current In Unit Net Contract Working Item Description Quantity Quantity Quantity Unit Price Change Days 1 Clearing and Grubbing, and Mobilization 1 1 - LS $10,000.00 $ - 2 Traffic Control, Signing and Striping 1 1 LS $10,000.00 $ - 3 10" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer(C700) 4,515 4,515 - LF $ 52.00 $ - 4 8" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer(C7W) 254 254 - LF $ 55.00 $ - 5 10" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer(C1208) 142 142 - LF $ 70.00 $ - 6 8" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe 63 63 - LF $ 65.00 $ 7 4" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer Lateral per City of Fontana Std. Detail No. 125 80 80 - LF $ 50.00 $ 8 6" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer Lateral per City of Fontana Std. Detail No. 125 249 249 - LF $ 50.00 $ 9 8" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer Lateral per City of Fontana Std. Detail No. 125 35 35 - LF $ 50.00 $ - 10 Sewer Manhole per City of Fontana Std. Detail No. 112, Modified to 5' Diameter Manhole 4 4 - EA $ 6,500.00 $ - 11 Sewer Manhole per City of Fontana Std. Detail No. 112, Modified to 4' Diameter Manhole 11 11 - EA $ 3,800.00 $ - Connection to Existing Sewer Manhole at Walnut& 12 Cypress inclding Manhole Base Reconstruction and Related Work 1 1 - EA $ 1,700.00 $ 13 Remove existing asphalt 9,774 9,774 - SF $ 0.10 $ - 14 Asphalt Concrete Pavement - - - TONS $ 37.00 $ - Page 1 of 2 Change ,:- Bid Revised Current In Unit Net Contract Working Item Description Quantity Quantity Quantity Unit Price Change Days Construct Microtunneling, complete with 36" steel 15 casing,jacking pits, receiving pit, redwood skids, etc. all per details. Negotiated Price $ 12,523.63 Construct Microtunneling, complet with 18" steel 16 casing,jacking pits, receieving pit, redwood skids, etc. all per details. 63.0 63.0 - LF $ 260.00 $ - - 17 Potholing existing utilities 25 25 - EA $ 25.00 $ - 18 Install asphalt overlay 1 1 - LS $42,150.00 $ - 19 Asphalt Concrete Pavement • 745 745 - TONS $ 41.00 $ - I TOTAL ADJUSTMENT TO CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 12,523.63 I +24 days, PROJECT SUMMARY: TOTAL AMOUNT OF CONTRACT: (thru C.O. #2): $ 494,762.35 TOTAL ADJUSTMENT TO CONTRACT AMOUNT(C.O. #3): $ 12,523.63 REVISED CONTRACT TOTAL AMOUNT: $ 507,285.98 TOTAL NUMBER OF DAYS TO COMPLETE THE WORK (thru C.O. #1): 45 Working days TOTAL ADJUSTMENT TO TIME TO COMPLETE: 24 Working days REVISED CONTRACT TIME TO COMPLETE: 66 Working days REVISED COMPLETION DATE: 9-Oct-02 NOTES: C.O.# 1 Change Order No.changed quantities in bid items 1,3,4,5 and 7,adding$172,980.09 to total contract amount and added 21 working days. Revised completion date January 15,2003. 2 Change Order No.2 changed the quantities in bid items 3,4,5,6,8,10,11,13,15,&17,deleted bid item 14,added bid item 19, and added 24 working days to the time to complete the project due to delays caused by underground utility interferences. 3 Change Order No.3 included a final payment of$11,550.11 to Ayala Boring and$1,200.00 to AD for overhead Prepared b : G% P Y Date: :,‘,4,j (Associated Engineers) Prepared by: Date: (Associated Engineers) Approved by: Date: (A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc.) Approved by: Date: (City of Fontana) 4 i i Change Order No. 3 Client Name: City of Fontana Job Name: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements Job Number: SP-46-02 P.O./W.O.. No.: 03-6P001 Pay Period: Final Prepared by: C. Curt Ingraham Date Prepared: May 16,2003 Change Bid Revised Current In Unit Net Contract Working Item Description Quantity Quantity Quantity Unit Price Change Days 1 Clearing and Grubbing, and Mobilization 1 1 - LS $10,000.00 $ - 2 Traffic Control, Signing and Striping 1 1 LS $10,000.00 $ - 3 10" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer(C700) 4,515 4,515 - LF $ 52.00 $ - 4 8" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer(C7W) 254 254 - LF $ 55.00 $ - 5 10" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer(C1208) 142 142 - LF $ 70.00 $ - 6 8" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe 63 63 - LF $ 65.00 $ - 7 4" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer Lateral per City of Fontana Std. Detail No. 125 80 80 - LF $ 50.00 $ - 8 6" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer Lateral per City of Fontana Std. Detail No. 125 249 249 - LF $ 50.00 $ - 9 8" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer Lateral per City of Fontana Std. Detail No. 125 35 35 - LF $ 50.00 $ - 10 Sewer Manhole per City of Fontana Std. Detail No.112, Modified to 5' Diameter Manhole 4 4 - EA $ 6,500.00 $ - 11 Sewer Manhole per City of Fontana Std. Detail No.112, Modified to 4' Diameter Manhole 11 11 - EA $ 3,800.00 $ - Connection to Existing Sewer Manhole at Walnut& 12 Cypress inclding Manhole Base Reconstruction and Related Work 1 1 - EA $ 1,700.00 $ - 13 Remove existing asphalt 9,774 9,774 - SF $ 0.10 $ - 14 Asphalt Concrete Pavement - - - TONS $ 37.00 $ - Page 1 of 2 Change Bid Revised Current In Unit Net Contract Working Item Description Quantity Quantity Quantity Unit Price Change Days Construct Microtunneling, complete with 36"steel 15 casing,jacking pits, receiving pit, redwood skids, etc. all per details. Negotiated Price $ 12,523.63 Construct Microtunneling, complet with 18" steel 16 casing,jacking pits, receieving pit, redwood skids, etc. all per details. 63.0 63.0 - LF $ 260.00 $ -17 Potholing existing utilities 25 25 - EA $ 25.00 $18 Install asphalt overlay 1 1 - LS $42,150.00 $ - 19 Asphalt Concrete Pavement 745 745 - TONS $ 41.00 $ - TOTAL ADJUSTMENT TO CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 12,523.63 +24 days PROJECT SUMMARY: TOTAL AMOUNT OF CONTRACT: (thru C.O. #2): $ 494,762.35 TOTAL ADJUSTMENT TO CONTRACT AMOUNT (C.O. #3): $ 12,523.63 REVISED CONTRACT TOTAL AMOUNT: $ 507,285.98 TOTAL NUMBER OF DAYS TO COMPLETE THE WORK (thru C.O. #1): 45 Working days TOTAL ADJUSTMENT TO TIME TO COMPLETE: 24 Working days REVISED CONTRACT TIME TO COMPLETE: 66 Working days REVISED COMPLETION DATE: 9-Oct-02 NOTES: C.O.# 1 Change Order No.changed quantities in bid items 1,3,4,5 and 7,adding$172,980.09 to total contract amount and added 21 working days. Revised completion date January 15,2003. 2 Change Order No.2 changed the quantities in bid items 3,4,5,6,8,10,11,13,15,&17,deleted bid item 14,added bid item 19, and added 24 working days to the time to complete the project due to delays caused by underground utility interferences. 3 Change Order No.3 included a final payment of$11,550.11 to Ayala Boring and$1,200.00 to AD for overhead 777./( ��Prepared by: — Date: .%/ /e (Associated Engineers) Prepared by: Date: (Associated Engineers) Approved by: Date: (A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc.) Approved by: Date: (City of Fontana) Change Order No. 3 Client Name: City of Fontana Job Name: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements Job Number: SP-46-02 P.O./W.O.. No.: 03-6P001 Pay Period: Final Prepared by: C. Curt Ingraham Date Prepared: May 16,2003 Change Bid Revised Current In Unit Net Contract Working Item Description Quantity Quantity Quantity Unit Price Change Days 1 Clearing and Grubbing, and Mobilization 1 1 - LS $10,000.00 $ - 2 Traffic Control, Signing and Striping 1 1 LS $10,000.00 $ - 3 10" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer(C700) 4,515 4,515 - LF $ 52.00 $ - 4 8" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer(C7W) 254 254 - LF $ 55.00 $ - 5 10" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer(C1208) 142 142 - LF $ 70.00 $ - 6 8" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe 63 63 - LF $ 65.00 $ - 7 4" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer Lateral per City of Fontana Std. Detail No. 125 80 80 - LF $ 50.00 $ - 8 6" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer Lateral per City of Fontana Std. Detail No. 125 249 249 - LF $ 50.00 $ - 9 8" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer Lateral per City of Fontana Std. Detail No. 125 35 35 - LF $ 50.00 $ - 10 Sewer Manhole per City of Fontana Std. Detail No. 112, Modified to 5' Diameter Manhole 4 4 - EA $ 6,500.00 $ - 11 Sewer Manhole per City of Fontana Std. Detail No. 112, Modified to 4' Diameter Manhole 11 11 - EA $ 3,800.00 $ - Connection to Existing Sewer Manhole at Walnut& 12 Cypress inclding Manhole Base Reconstruction and Related Work 1 1 - EA $ 1,700.00 $ - 13 Remove existing asphalt 9,774 9,774 - SF $ 0.10 $ - 14 Asphalt Concrete Pavement - - - TONS $ 37.00 $ - Page 1 of 2 Y • Change 'Bid Revised Current In Unit Net Contract Working Item Description Quantity Quantity Quantity Unit Price Change Days Construct Microtunneling, complete with 36" steel 15 casing,jacking pits, receiving pit, redwood skids, etc. all per details. Negotiated Price $ 12,523.63 Construct Microtunneling, complet with 18" steel 16 casing,jacking pits, receieving pit, redwood skids, etc. all per details. 63.0 63.0 - LF $ 260.00 $ - - 17 Potholing existing utilities 25 25 - EA $ 25.00 $ - 18 Install asphalt overlay 1 1 - LS $42,150.00 $ - 19 Asphalt Concrete Pavement 745 745 - TONS $ 41.00 $ - TOTAL ADJUSTMENT TO CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 12,523.63 +24 days PROJECT SUMMARY: TOTAL AMOUNT OF CONTRACT: (thru C.O. #2): $ 494,762.35 TOTAL ADJUSTMENT TO CONTRACT AMOUNT(C.O. #3): $ 12,523.63 REVISED CONTRACT TOTAL AMOUNT: $ 507,285.98 TOTAL NUMBER OF DAYS TO COMPLETE THE WORK (thru C.O. #1): 45 Working days TOTAL ADJUSTMENT TO TIME TO COMPLETE: 24 Working days REVISED CONTRACT TIME TO COMPLETE: 66 Working days REVISED COMPLETION DATE: 9-Oct-02 NOTES: C.O.# 1 Change Order No.changed quantities in bid items 1,3,4,5 and 7,adding$172,980.09 to total contract amount and added 21 working days. Revised completion date January 15,2003. 2 Change Order No.2 changed the quantities in bid items 3,4,5,6,8,10,11,13,15,&17,deleted bid item 14,added bid item 19, and added 24 working days to the time to complete the project due to delays caused by underground utility interferences. 3 Change Order No.3 included a final payment of$11,550.11 to Ayala Boring and$1,200.00 to AD for overhead /� O Prepared by: Date: // 7 (Associated Engineers) Prepared by: Date: (Associated Engineers) 0. Approved by: Date: (A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc.) Approved by: Date: (City of Fontana) i 11. . . , . 111 . 11 .__. i /_e 67/ /1-#60.- • 3---11---° 7 ,11 ,.' • . f Acqf 4•...-Wia.f /9'41;.° 6 e!...As_e•••••c/ .e.1.. C/c-,..**- / . L!t. A .4-A• , o'L: .'7/I- '•/7/ GI e C I: /41.6•••;Ps /11:-.3 , 4__.-........,e../ i.i.. • _ - I _•. .- !I, . e9 Ce 9...}- fri/e....) 0‘ . • , 11. — .1[12) ea,', I /a(',•-:4. •.( 045 ..re/77e _.7,-- ...rA ;i, /1"' ;-C e•-, ( /1°1"le ......rAs ../k....--4.1.-- 77------ . IL !t, 4.1.4 . I' . I•' A A., .1 • . . I (. 0.---r--e,-- A..1?, .0./"..-6). ,.5-/C /;414 j-,;.-:1-- 4,1 ifs-177c-....,....t.....A: ----------------; 1, ' - • 1;I 4..-,,. k:/r 4 i s- ...7-•"... , I- . ..-vi-- /Tee y i 'f it- ,- ' . _._. . . , . . • I'll .____ - iti r•-,.-,-,.._,, ii-;I/ t.--.-• /-c /4e--- 4 A, .57....tr.,....,.. ...-.-..._/....•c ...,- .1, a//•a 1—,41_,... --1;.; _.. . . . .. • • i 1 ; 1;!.. . . • . • . : . • k . . HI , FW: Draft Letter of AD General Page 1 of 1 Harvilla, George 9 From: Carla Pursel [cpursel@fontana.org] Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 1:44 PM To: George Harvilla @ PB Subject: FW: Draft Letter of AD General Here's the update. cp Original Message From: Teri Ortiz [mailto:TOrtizc bbklaw.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 1:45 PM To: cpursel@fontana.org Subject: Draft Letter of AD General It is being drafted today and will be done tomorrow. 5/22/2003 Associated Engineers, Inc. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 11 3311 E.SHELBY STREET,ONTARIO,CA 91764-4872 (909)980-1982 FAX(909)941-0891 • I� . t),618 9107,'� April 7, 2003 M 2003 (51 _, co . Mr.Scott Snyder ss� , ., A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. dam, ,�� 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Ica 'l,� Suite 106/101 ��Se•r77azZ� Burbank, CA 91504 , . Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— Settlement for Outstanding Claims • Dear Mr. Snyder: Pursuant to our meeting with Ayala Boring, Inc. and Mr. Bryan Kier, A.D. General,on Friday, April 4, 2003 at the offices of Associated Engineers, Inc., we are prepared to offer the following settlement terms to address all of A.D. General's outstanding claims. A. Ayala Boring, Inc. Claim for Production Impacts — We have reviewed the construction records for the installation of the 36" steel casing on South Highland Avenue across Sierra Avenue, and discussed the problems Ayala Boring, Inc. encountered in installing the casing. Based on our records and those conversations, due to the need to manually clear rock from within the casing,the casing installation rate was reduced by 50%, requiring an additional three (3) days to install the casing. Using the daily work records, we have determined that the work performed on August 29, 2003, August 30, 2003, and September 4, 2003 were directed toward removing the rock. Therefore, we have agreed to, and Ayala Boring, Inc. has concurred, that the impacts of the additional work resulting in $11,323.63 in additional costs. We will recommend that amount be included in a change order to "Item No. 15, Construct Microtunneling, complete with 36-inch steel casing,jacking pit, receiving pit, redwood skids, etc. all per details". In addition, you have requested that additional bonding fees be added to the total cost in the amount of$226.48. _This amount will be added to the change order,but will not be paid until A.D. General provides copies of updated bonds showing the increased contract amount. B. A.D. General Claims—We currently have several claims from A.D. General that we discussed with Mr. Bryan Kier of your office. These are as follows: 1. Olsen Pre-cast—claim dated November 13, 2002, in the amount of$1,035.00. 2. Irrigation Line Replacement—claim dated October 23, 2002, in the amount of$8,700.00. Subsequently superceded by claims dated January 9, 2002 in the amount of$464.04, January 9, 2003 in the amount of$3,862.33, and January 9, 2003 in the amount of$1,701.96, for a total revised claim amount of$6,028-33. O:000-NO\200I\01-064\Final Oair,Settlement Letter 4_7 03.doc . PLANNING DESIGNING SURVEYING • 3. Delay on Walnut due to soils testing—claim dated January 9, 2003, in the amount of $1,838.49. 4. Delay due to PacBell interference—claim dated January 9, 2003, in the amount of $1,325.79. 5. Claim for Late Payment—claim dated January 9, 2003, in the amount of$2,967.29. The total of all claims is $13,194.90 using the revised claim amounts for the irrigation line repair. After reviewing the backup submitted on these claims, and reviewing the terms of the Contract and Green Book, we are willing to recommend to the City of Fontana that an amount equal to $3,325.79 be paid for these claims. • We can find no provision in the Contract or the Green Book which would support a claim for the Olsen Pre-cast claim (Claim No. 1), or provisions which entitle A.D. General to late charges on progress payments (No: 5). Therefore, no compensation is included for these items. Claim No. 3 was for work associated with re-working areas that failed compaction that would not have required re- testing if A.D. General's original compaction work had met specifications. Therefore, we Claim No. 4 will be recommended for$1,325.79, and Claim No. 2 for$2,000.00 for materials installed. If you are in agreement with the total settlement amount of$14,875.90 for all outstanding claims, please sign and return a copy of this letter and we can process the change order documents. If you have any questions,please feel free to contact me at(909) 980-1982: Yours truly, ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS INC. AGREED BY: A.D. GENERAL ENGINEERING INC. Thomas R.Holliman,PE Senior Project Manager SCOTT SNYDER cc: President italph Roberts,A-E Date: J.N. 01-064 0:u00-NO\2001\01-O64\Flea!Claim Se-ttlernenr Letter 9 7 03.doc April 7, 2003 Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— Settlement for Outstanding Claims Dear Mr. Snyder: Pursuant to our meeting with Ayala Boring, Inc. and Mr. Bryan Kier, A.D. General, on Friday, April 4, 2003 at the offices of Associated Engineers,Inc.,we are prepared to offer the following settlement terms to address all of A.D. General's outstanding claims. A. Ayala Boring,Inc. Claim for Production Impacts—We have reviewed the construction records for the installation of the 36" steel casing on South Highland Avenue across Sierra Avenue, and discussed the problems Ayala Boring, Inc. y g encountered in installing the casing. Based on our records and those conversations, due to the need to manually clear rock from within the casing the casing installation rate was reduced by 50% requiring an additional three days to install the casing. Using the daily work records we have determined that the work performed on August 29, 2003, August 30, 2003, and September 4, 2003 was directed toward removing the rock. Therefore we have agreed to, and Ayala Boring, Inc.has concurred, that the impacts of the additional work resulting in $11,323.63 in additional costs. We will recommend that amount be included in a change order to "Item No. 15, Construct Microtunneling, complete with 36-inch steel casing,jacking pit,receiving pit,redwood skids, etc. all per details". In addition you have requested that additional bonding fees be added to the total cost in the amount of$226.48. This amount will be added to the change order, but will not be paid until A.D. General provides copies of updated bonds showing the increased contract amount. B. A.D. General Claims —We currently have several claims from A.D. General that we discussed with Mr. Bryan Kier of your office. These are as follows: 1. Olsen Pre-cast — claim dated November 13, 2002, in the amount of $1,035.00& C:\Documents and Settings\harvilla.W-SBNCIV29\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK6\Final Claim Settlement Letter 4_7_03.doc 2. Irrigation Line Replacement — claim dated October 23, 2002, in the amount of $8,700.00. Subsequently superceded by claims dated January 9, 2002 in the amount of $464.04, January 9, 2003 in the amount of $3,862.33, and January 9, 2003 in the amount of $1,701.96. For a total revised claim amount of$6,028.33. ei 3. Delay on Walnut due to soils testing—claim dated January 9, 2003, in the amount of$1,838.49. 4. Delay due to PacBell interference — claim dated January 9, 2003, in the amount of$1,325.79. 5. Claim for Late Payment — claim dated January 9, 2003, in the amount of $2,967.29. The total of all claims is $13,194.90 using the revised claim amounts for the irrigation line repair. After reviewing all of the backup submitted on these claims, and reviewing E the terms of the contract and Green Book, we are willing to recommend to the City_of` -1, Fontana that an amount equal to $ ,325.79 bepaid for these claims. Claim No. 1 and No. q � 3E°..f 5 have no contractual basis for approval. Claim No. 3 was for work associated with re- working areas that failed compaction that which would not have required testing if A.D. .,f" General's original compaction work met specifications. Claim No. 4 will be recommended and$1,000.00 for Claim No. 2 for materials installed. yagreement 1 p If you are in a eement with these am ounts lease sign and return a copy of this letter and we can process the change order documents. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (909) 980-1982. Yours truly, ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS INC. Thomas R. Holliman,PE Senior Project Manager CC: George Harvilla, PB-Fontana Ralph Roberts, A-E Agreed, A.D. General Engineering,Inc. Mr. Scott Snyder,President C:\Documents and Settings\harvilla.W-SBNCIV29\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK6\Final Claim Settlement Letter 4_7_03.doc Harvilla, George From: Tom Holliman [tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Monday,April 07, 2003 2:52 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: November 15,2002 Final Claim Settlement Letter... Please review and comment. I'd like to get this to Scott as soon as possible. Thanks, Tom 1 Harvilla, George From: Tom Holliman [tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Monday,April 07, 2003 9:11 AM • To: scott@adgenengr.com Cc: "Ralph Roberts"; Harvilla, George • Subject: RE: Meeting for Ayala Claim - Fontana Sewer Scott, We met with Ayala on Friday with Bryan and reached what we believe to be a final agreement, we also provided Bryan with an offer to settle your remaining claims as well. I will provide you a letter outlining the terms of the agreement with Ayala and the terms of the final settlement offer to you later this afternoon by fax, and then follow-up with a registered letter this afternoon you'll probably get tomorrow. If you're in agreement with the terms we can prepare a final change order to reflect these changes and anything else outstanding and get it to you for execution. Once the change order is signed you can bill for the amounts owed and we can begin preparing the final closeout letters to City Council so we file notice of completion and start the retention release countdown. Tom Holliman Senior Project Manager Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 E. Shelby Street Ontario, CA 91764 (909) 980-1982 Original Message From: scott@adgenengr.com [mailto:scott@adgenengr.com] Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2003 8:11 PM To: torah@assoc-eng.com Cc: Harvilla@pbworld.com Subject: Meeting for Ayala Claim - Fontana Sewer Mr. Tom Holliman, Upon speaking with Mr. Ralph Ayala Jr. , Ayala Boring Inc. , I was informed by him there was an agreement reached concerning Ayala's claim. Is this correct? When will I receive official documents for this? Please inform A.D. of what is needed as part of the process to finalize Ayala's claim as soon as possible. Scott A. Snyder 1 Harvilla, George From: scott@ad enen r.com 9 9 Sent: Monday, April 07,2003 8:45 AM To: tomh@assoc-eng.com Cc: Harvilla, George Subject: Ayala's Claim Tom, Any claim agreement with Ayala raises my bond price so if the price is as he say's $11,324.00 my bond price is an additional $226.48. Please include that into the cost of the C.O. Scott 1 ---.-----------.._la:_,_. /per Ic_I�`,- / /_�_!._ /61. _ Is• i _T``y _�.., — -___ 23 !ima �_—/Pc/ h /9)'es./!S m — _—_-_ - • —_ -u_•--- /-'!'s_� to O/< Z-6s_r eD _4_�c«_o/ ._— ---- — I, . ,, I. I: /6 2_� f . • ,,, 1JII 0_1 _!__cam —CS .P�+ / .:‘'.+< /"! c7 ._.�/.G- !�._ih- ---�- _�. Ili f '/.I.Z Y , o ___,A '''. Pam- . 41., / 5 2 ‘ ti'.-,c- .4.-- t? • - • t'1 III Harvilla, George From: scott@adgenengr.com Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 2:05 PM To: Harvilla@pbworld.com Cc: curti@assoc-eng.com Subject: Fontana-S. Highland Ave Sewer George, Due to the length of time passed since work was completed, primarily due from extensive delay's from Tom Holliman of Associated Engineers. And being that claims are not yet resolved and we are still waiting on resolved ones. I believe a date needs be established retroactively from which the one year warranty period began. I therefore officially make such request with a date yet to be determined. Scott A. Snyder 1 4� • Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George • Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 12:27 PM To: 'Curt Ingraham';Tom Holliman (tholliman@boyleengineering.com) Subject: FW: S. Highland Sewer FYI Original Message From: Harvilla, George Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 12:27 PM To: 'scott@adgenengr.com' Subject: RE: S. Highland Sewer Scott, We have an internal City meeting scheduled for later this week with the City Attorney. The Ayala claim is being finalized. George Harvilla Original Message From: scott@adgenengr.com [mailto:scott@adgenengr.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 8:18 AM To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: S. Highland Sewer George, I have been waiting for you to contact me on this, I need to have something very soon. Tom Holliman held things like this for weeks/months. It's over five weeks since the meeting for Ayala's claim and agreement. Scott A. Snyder On Thu, 1 May 2003 19:51:35 -0400 , "Harvilla, George" wrote: > Scott, > No letter has been sent to you by either Associated Engineers or me > since your letter to Associated Engineers dated April 21, 2003. > We are beginning to process Ayala's claim. > Regarding the remaining claims with A.D. General, City staff will > be > consulting with the City Attorney. After meeting with the attorney, > we will contact you. > Curt Ingraham's e-mail address is curti@assoc-eng.com. > > George Harvilla 1 > > Original Message > From: scott@adgenengr.coin [mailto:scott@adgenengr.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 8:41 AM > To: Harvilla@pbworld.com > Subject: S. Highland Sewer > George, • > I was told by Kurt Ingram of Associated Engineering you have a letter > in reply to our latest letter concerning the claims. He said I should > have received it and that was last Thursday 4/24, but he has not > gotten back to let me know what's going on. Please > get back with me concerning this. Thank you. > Will you please send Kurt's E-mail address. > Scott 2 Change Order #2 and Progress Payment #3 Page 1 of 1 Harvilla, George From: Thomas Holliman [tholliman@boyleengineering.com] Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2003 10:47 AM To: curti@assoc-eng.com Cc: George Harvilla (E-mail) Subject: FW: Change Order#2 and Progress Payment#3 Curt, Here are the two documents we talked about, please review them and use them to generate the documents to close out Ayala Boring. If you have any questions give me a call. It's probably best to get me on my cell phone since I'm always bouncing between offices in Ontario and Newport Beach. Here's my cell phone: 909-741-5220. Please call George today to assist in arranging a meeting with the City Attorney, I'm open all day Tuesday and Wednesday next week at least for now, I think George will let me know when the meeting is happening. Thanks, Tom Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Tuesday,April 22, 2003 12:00 PM To: Thomas Holliman Subject: Change Order #2 and Progress Payment #3 «Change Order No.2 10_21_02 trh.xls» «PROGESS PAYMENT NO. 3 10_21_02trh.xls» 5/8/2003 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday, May 01,2003 4:55 PM To: 'Curt Ingraham' Cc: Tom Holliman (tholliman@boyleengineering.com) • Subject: FW: S. Highland Sewer Importance: High Curt, Please do what you can to expedite the Change Order so Ayala can get their check. They've been enquiring about it. Thank you. George Original Message From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 4:52 PM To: 'scott@adgenengr.com' Cc: Curt Ingraham (curti@assoc-eng.com) ; Tom Holliman (tholliman@boyleengineering.com) ; Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org) ; Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org) Subject: RE: S. Highland Sewer Importance: High Scott, No letter has been sent to you by either Associated Engineers or me since your letter to Associated Engineers dated April 21, 2003 . We are beginning to process Ayala's claim. Regarding the remaining claims with A.D. General, City staff will be consulting with the City Attorney. After meeting with the attorney, we will contact you. Curt Ingraham's e-mail address is curti@assoc-eng.com. George Harvilla Original Message From: scott@adgenengr.com [mailto:scott@adgenengr.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 8:41 AM To: Harvilla@pbworld.com Subject: S. Highland Sewer George, I was told by Kurt Ingram of Associated Engineering you have a letter in reply to our latest letter concerning the claims. He said I should have received it and that was last Thursday 4/24, but he has not gotten back to let me know what's going on. Please get back with me concerning this. Thank you. Will you please send Kurt's E-mail address. Scott 1 �.D.geHe'r`a! Engineering Constftelion Inc, sr," 2124 N.G1enys BNci,Ss,1CBt101 t Burbank,CA 91504 PIWe(818)552-7363 o Fax(418)558-&932 FGxLCOYER SHEET DATE / (4:1 /DS RECIP1ENTe " cam S \`A FAX ) o`1 '� Zl --9 t c1 PHONE 1F ( ) COMPANY Ct A.D,CENERAL ENOINEERJNO CONSTRUCTION NC, SENDER PAX X ( 812 ) 559 .5Sv2 PHONE A ( 012 )559. 73$3 MESSAGE • -7 . )4UMSER OF PAGES (W/COVER SHEET) T 'd ZOSS-GSS -00000000000000000000 dirO =E'T SO SO R?W ` d • May 6, 2003 Al) General Engineering Construction Inc., 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Ste. 106/101 Burbank,CA 91504 City of Fontana 8353 Sierra Ave. Fontana, CA. 92335 Project: South Highland Ave. and Juniper Ave. Sewer System Improvement� Invoice No. 1550 Item: Total Amt. Due Markup Per Ayala S 1,200.00 Settlement 2 •d 20SS-6SS '0000000000000000000.0 4. .0 =2T co 90 Re& ,re FAX • --too YEARS PARSONS �4 1.t BRlNCKERHOFF 16689 Foothill Boulevard �' , Suite 103 'j Fontana,CA 92335 909-427-9166 Fax:909-427-9169 harvilla@pbworld.com To: From: George Harvilla Cv�'T Jr��rG,�GyY,f Date: c_ 6- 03 Project No.: Fax No.: 916-77_ OP y/ No. of Pages (including this page): 7 Subject: A. �. 6//;,7 /t14.-Av r, oA, -re «� Comments: • • Over a Century of Engineering Excellence RESPONSE REQUESTED - Harvilla, George From: Thomas Holliman [tholliman @ boyleengineering.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 07,2003 9:40 AM To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: FW:Ayala C.O. Thanks for the information George, setting aside Scott's comments regarding his "costs" for the change order, and as an individual observer and not an employee of Associated Engineers, and not acting as an employee of Boyle Engineering Corporation, the 10% mark-up is pretty standard and normally covers all of the Contractor's costs, processing, internal contract amendment processing, etc. Since AD General is stating, among other things, that they used a 10% mark-up, plus a small adjustment for misc. expenses, I think that should constitute their basis and other detailed calculations wouldn't be warranted. Hope that helps, Tom Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 9:22 AM To: 'Curt Ingraham' Cc: Thomas Holliman Subject: FW: FW: Ayala C.O. FYI Original Message From: scott@adgenengr.com [mailto:scott@adgenengr.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 6:27 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: Re: FW: Ayala C.O. George, No where does it say in the section quoted that detailed calculations are required. The spec say's and I quote, "A reasonable allowance for the Contractors overhead and profit SHALL be added to the sum of the subcontractor's cost AND markup and shall constitute the markup for all overhead and profit for the CONTRACTOR on work BY the Subcontractor. " end quote. The amount invoiced is ten percent of the Ayala claim plus a little for the added bond cost on the mark up. Which by the way is more than what I put down. If you want more, I will count every meeting such as that Friday which cost me in labor, fuel, office supplies, etc all, around $300 alone. Then I will add in the all these same items and the other resources used, plus time spent at other meetings this topic was discussed, all the paper work and labor for the paper work that was spent in submitting this claim four or five times. I'll add in postage cost's, Fed Exp cost's, toll charges from call's and faxes. And then I'll do the same for all these things and any left out, that were spent with Ayala in relaying info, phone calls, meetings, assisting with there paper work requirements needed to give to A.D. , etc, etc, etc. And then there's the time, resources, etc I'll have to add to the bill for the additional cost in providing the detailed calculations required by the Agency Rep's in order for processing of Ayala's claim. I'll do this but the invoice of $1200.00 is rescinded. The revised billing will be the 1 rtotal from the calculations. And since all will be "detailed calculations" there won't be any question over the total amount due A.D. Let me know which it is you decide upon. Sincerely, Scott A. Snyder President,CEO A.D. General Engineering Construction Inc. On Tue, 6 May 2003 13:07:45 -0400 , "Harvilla, George" wrote: > Scott, > Please provide detailed calculations on how you arrived at the $1200 > amount. > Thank you. > George Harvilla > Original Message > From: scott@adgenengr.com [mailto:scott@adgenengr.com] > Sent: Monday, May 05, 2003 1:47 PM > To: Harvilla@pbworld.com > Subject: Ayala C.O. > George - According to SSPWC section 3-3.3.3 I am allowed a markup > to Ayala's settlement in addition to the Bonding markup. You will > receive a invoice for $1,200.00 shortly. 2 Harvilla, George From: scott@adgenengr.com Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 6:27 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: Re: FW: Ayala C.O. George, No where does it say in the section quoted that detailed calculations are required. The spec say's and I quote, "A reasonable allowance for the Contractors overhead and profit SHALL be added to the sum of the subcontractor's cost AND markup and shall constitute the markup for all overhead and profit for the CONTRACTOR on work BY the Subcontractor. " end quote. The amount invoiced is ten percent of the Ayala claim plus a little for the added bond cost on the mark up. Which by the way is more than what I put down. If you want more, I will count every meeting such as that Friday which cost me in labor, fuel, office supplies, etc all, around $300 alone. Then I will add in the all these same items and the other resources used, plus time spent at other meetings this topic was discussed, all the paper work and labor for the paper work that was spent in submitting this claim four or five times. I'll add in postage cost's, Fed Exp cost's, toll charges from call's and faxes. And then I'll do the same for all these things and any left out, that were spent with Ayala in relaying info, phone calls, meetings, assisting with there paper work requirements needed to give to A.D. , etc, etc, etc. And then there's the time, resources, etc I'll have to add to the bill for the additional cost in providing the detailed calculations required by the Agency Rep's in order for processing of Ayala's claim. I'll do this but the invoice of $1200.00 is rescinded. The revised billingwill be the total from the calculations. And since all will be "detailed calculations" there won't be any question over the total amount due A.D. Let me know which it is you decide upon. Sincerely, Scott A. Snyder President,CEO A.D. General Engineering Construction Inc. On Tue, 6 May 2003 13:07:45 -0400 , "Harvilla, George" wrote: > Scott, > Please provide detailed calculations on how you arrived at the $1200 > amount. > > Thank you. > George Harvilla 1 .i > > Original Message > From: scott@adgenengr.com [mailto:scott@adgenengr.com] > Sent: Monday, May 05, 2003 1:47 PM > To: Harvilla@pbworld.com > Subject: Ayala C.O. > George - According to SSPWC section 3-3.3.3 I am allowed a markup > to Ayala's settlement in addition to the Bonding markup. You will > receive a invoice for $1,200.00 shortly. 2 ill Hary a, George From: Curt Ingraham [curti@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Monday, May 05, 2003 2:56 PM To: 'Harvilla, George' Subject: RE: Ayala C.O. He is allowed 10% on the first $5,000 and 5% on the rest per section 3-3.2.3 b) . I understand that this is to include and bond cost when the work is completed by a sub- contractor. g L r_ ///321, (. a ,ou/ ,/ Co„ s o� Curt S 4 9'63aC-3/6a$ e/ Original Message // From: Harvilla, George [SMTP:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Monday, May 05, 2003 1:54 PM To: Curt Ingraham (curti@assoc-eng.com) ; Tom Holliman (tholliman@boyleengineering.com) Cc: Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org) Subject: FW: Ayala C.O. Curt, Is Scott's markup reasonable? Carla will call you with times when the City Attorney is available for our meeting. Tom, What is the possibility of you joining us for at least the first meeting with the City attorney? George Original Message From: scott@adgenengr.com [mailto:scott@adgenengr.com] Sent: Monday, May 05, 2003 1:47 PM To: Harvilla@pbworld.com Subject: Ayala C.O. George - According to SSPWC section 3-3.3.3 I am allowed a markup to Ayala's settlement in addition to the Bonding markup. You will receive a invoice for $1,200.00 shortly. ,/G. /P ¢-- 22 = ri 0 z 1 Harvilla, George From: scott@adgenengr.com Sent: Monday, May 05, 2003 9:01 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: Re Markup George - The section referenced was wrong the correct number is 3-3.2.3. 1 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 4:52 PM To: 'scott@adgenengr.com' Cc: Curt Ingraham (curti@assoc-eng.com);Tom Holliman (tholliman@boyleengineering.com); Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org); Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org) Subject: RE: S. Highland Sewer ` Importance: High ,t �r'� f Air \ \ ���� �k r 6vA Scott, L No letter has been sent to you by either Associated Engineers or me since your letter to Associated Engineers dated April 21, 2003. We are beginning to process Ayala's claim. Regarding the remaining claims with A.D. General, City staff will be consulting with the City Attorney. After meeting with the attorney, we will contact you. Curt Ingraham's e-mail address is curti@assoc-eng.com. George Harvilla Original Message From: scott@adgenengr.com [mailto:scott@adgenengr.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 8:41 AM To: Harvilla@pbworld.com Subject: S. Highland Sewer George, I was told by Kurt Ingram of Associated Engineering you have a letter in reply to our latest letter concerning the claims. He said I should have received it and that was last Thursday 4/24, but he has not gotten back to let me know what's going on. Please get back with me concerning this. Thank you. Will you please send Kurt's E-mail address. Scott 1 FW: Fontana Change Order From Associated Engineers Page 1 of 2 Harvilla, George From: Carla Purse! [cpursel@fontana.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 11:41 AM To: George Harvilla @ PB; Ray Bragg Subject: FW: Fontana Change Order From Associated Engineers The following was received from Ayala Boring. cp Original Message From: Kathy Brauer[mailto:kbrauer(a�ayalaboring.com] Sent:Wednesday,April 30, 2003 11:33 AM To: cpursel@fontana.org Subject: Fontana Change Order From Associated Engineers Carla, This is the e-mail sent to Ayala Boring Inc.from AD General. It appears that a C.O. and joint check only for the agreed to amount of$11,324.00 will settle this matter. Please be advised that Ayala is also still owed Retention on our Invoice No.4834 dated 9/24/03 in the amount of$4,134.90. Due to the delays and problems in getting paid on this project we will not be able to release the Stop Notice until we are paid in full ($15,458.90). Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Kathy Brauer Ayala Boring Inc. Original Message From: <scott@adgenengr.com> To: <rayalajr@ayalaboring.com> Sent: Tuesday,April 22, 2003 3:30 PM Subject: Fontana Change Order From Associated Engineers > Ralph, >Want to give you an update.Associated is at it again with their > games. They know I am going to file suit against them for many > issues that went on out there and their mismanagement. I told >them prior to the meeting you had with them A.D.was not going to >discuss any further our outstanding claims,the meeting is for >Ayala's claim only. > So what do they go and do?They send me your C.O. for the boring > but they tie it in with my C.O.'s.The problem is my claims are > not settled as I just described to you. I told them to write a >separate C.O.for your settlement but they did as they pleased. 4/30/2003 FW: Fontana Change Order From Associated Engineers Page 2 of 2 rY. > can only guess that they thought they would pressure me into >taking their ridiculous settlement by making it all one C.O. > I wrote Associated Engineers a letter stating how wrong they are >to do this. That they have no right in causing you to wait longer >because of their games. They have not responded as of yet. I will > keep you informed. >Sincerely, >Scott A. Snyder >A.D. General Engineering >Construction Inc, 4/30/2003 FW: AD General Response Letter Page 1 of 4 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 1:46 PM To: Carla Pursel (E-mail) Subject: FW:AD General Response Letter FYI Original Message From: Thomas Holliman [mailto:tholliman@boyleengineering.com] Sent: Wednesday,April 30, 2003 1:40 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: AD General Response Letter Hi George, I got your emails regarding the meeting with the City Attorney, the only times I'm unavailable are Monday mornings, and Thursday afternoons, other than that I'm good to go. I also read Scott's email to Ayala Boring. I agree that a seperate change order for the boring extras would be in order since we have already agreed with Ayala Boring. A two party check would also be helpful but I'm not sure if the City can process such a reqeust since it has no agreement with Ayala Boring. If AD General were to make the request it might be something to do. It would be a first for me, in the past my agencies have always said the contractor is the only party to whom the agency can make payments. As a back-up we could provide Ayala Boring with notice that we have sent AD General the money so they would at least know that AD General got paid and press their demand for payment from AD General. Tom Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 1:12 PM To: Curt Ingraham (E-mail); Thomas Holliman Subject: FW: AD General Response Letter FYI Original Message From: Carla Pursel [mailto:cpursel@fontana.org] Sent: Wednesday,April 30, 2003 11:22 AM To: Harvilla, George Cc: Ray Bragg Subject: RE: AD General Response Letter George - I received a phone call from Mr. Ralph Ayala, Jr. Seems Scott has sent him an e-mail regarding the claims issues stating that the City is lumping all claims together and Ayala's claim amount may not end up being the amount they agreed upon. I told him that we were working on this issue and that the City is working to get this resolved ASAP to get Ayala's money released and that our outstanding issues are with AD General, not Ayala. He requested that when and if the outstanding monies are paid out, if the check could be made payable as a joint check so that he could get his money from AD General. He also said he would forward the message he received from Scott to me, I will then share with you. Carla 5/1/2003 FW: AD General Response Letter Page 2 of 4 Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 9:20 AM To: Ray Bragg (E-mail); Curt Ingraham (E-mail);Tom Holliman (E-mail) • Cc: Carla Pursel (E-mail) Subject: FW: AD General Response Letter Ray, We need to have our Construction Managers from Associated Engineers present as well when we meet with the City Attorney. Tom already has put together a package with backup and a timeline. I would suggest first you or Carla contact the City Attorney for a meeting time, and then the rest of us will see if we have any other conflicts (Carla,you already know about 10:00 Monday meeting and the Thursday 11:00 Traffic meeting). Curt and Tom, Please review the package Tom put together and make sure the timeline is clear and concise. Please let Carla know today what days are not good for you to meet for next week and the following week. Thank you, George Original Message From: Ray Bragg [mailto:rbragg@fontana.org] Sent: Wednesday,April 30, 2003 8:22 AM To: 'Harvilla, George' Subject: RE: AD General Response Letter George: In anticipation of meeting with the City Attorney, please put together a brief outline chronology of the project and actions taken since the completion of construction to resolve this issue. Ray Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Tuesday,April 29, 2003 4:29 PM To: 'Ray Bragg' Cc: 'Carla Pursel'; 'Curt Ingraham'; Tom Holliman (tholliman@boyleengineering.com) Subject: FW: AD General Response Letter Ray, A. D. General,the contractor of the South Highland Sewer, has rejected the City's offer of$3,325.79 for their five claims. The total amount of the five claims (as computed by the City) is $13,194.90. A.D. General is threatening legal action if they don't receive payment of$14,184 (I'm not sure how he came up with this number). I believe it is now time to either 1)contact the City Attorney for his guidance, or 2) pay A.D. General the full amount of the claims so this will go away, even though Tom and I feel they are not due the roughly $10,000 we have previously rejected. 5/1/2003 FW: AD General Response Letter Page 3 of 4 The last piece of pipe went into the ground in October. These claims have gone back and forth for six months now. I'll fax you a copy of A.D. General's letter. Tom Holliman's input is below. Tom/Curt, I concur that we should begin processing Ayala's claim so they can get their check. Please prepare the change order. George Original Message From:Thomas Holliman [mailto:tholliman@boyleengineering.com] Sent: Wednesday,April 23, 2003 4:52 PM To: harvilla@pbworld.com Cc: curti@assoc-eng.com Subject: AD General Response Letter George, Sorry for the delay in sending the fax over to you of the letter I received from Scott Snyder,A.D. General Engineering. It's hard to respond to Scott's letter because it doesn't really have anything in it which we can address. I find it interesting that after ignoring our registered letter for several weeks he sends me a letter demanding approval of their full claim with one day's notice or he will have his attorney file a lawsuit. Apparently he was not satisfied with our offer of settlement and instead of accepting the$3500+/-with the Ayala Boring settlement he is rejecting that amount and demanding the full amount of his claims. I'm at a loss to understand what Scott is talking about when he refers to interoffice correspondence not meant for me to see?witnesses other than AD employees who heard direction given to remove irrigation lines? documentation unaswered? or our daily reports which say alot? He always says he has proof(from beginning to end) but everytime I ask him for it I never get anything back. Given his posture I can only recommend the following course of action. 1. Execute a change order for the Ayala Boring settlement amount with or without Scott's signature. This change order no. 3 should only be Ayala Boring and Scott's additional bonding amount. We then process a progress payment for the Ayala Boring amount and tell Scott if he if he wants the bonding money he'll have to produce proof of the additional bond before we agree to pay for it, and give him let's say a reasonable amount of time to secure the bond like 72 hours (3 days). Then we can cut a check to AD for the Ayala Boring portion and not hold them up. 2. We turn over Scott's claims to the City Attorney for evaluation. Scott is making legal accusations that are beyond the scope of Associated Engineer's contract services and outside of my professional practice. I pointed out the sections in the Green Book and the contract which I in good faith, and based on my experience, addressed his claims. He cited California public contract law which I'm not familiar with or know if it applies. I think the City Attorney should evaluate the basis for the claims and determine if there is legal merit. If Scott does file a lawsuit then the lawyers will be getting involved anyway so we may as well give them a headstart. 3. You should respond to Scott, as the City,that the matter has been turned over to the City Attorney due to his threat of a lawsuit for review and based on the outcome of that review a final determination will be made. If Scott files a lawsuit then there may trigger a countersuit against AD General for filing frivolous claims with a demand he pay Associated Engineer's and PB-Fontana's extended overhead for dealing with the 5/1/2003 FW: AD General Response Letter Page 4 of 4 frivolous claims and the cost of City Attorney review. We may also remind him that if he files a lawsuit that we will be entitled to discovery which means he will have to provide all of his evidence As you know I have asked Scott on numerous occasions in emails and in writing to produce evidence to support his claims. So far all he has produced is hearsay and threats. Since I am no longer an employee of Associated Engineers I can't respond on behalf of the company, and although I've told Scott a number of times I couldn't"approve" his claims even if he had a case because that authority resides with the City of Fontana. Given that I think a response from you faxed tomorrow with a follow-up registered letter would be in order. If he does file a lawsuit let me know. Thanks, Tom Holliman 5/1/2003 M +909-941-0=r_,91 fs1sOc�I HTED ENO I NEEF'S 545 F' 1 APR 25 't=t._; 1 1" 0' 0 . 4 I JOB NO. 0/' 4 TELEFAX TELEFAX TELEFAX TELEFAX ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS, INC. k Consulting Civil Engineering il APR 2003 3311 East Shelby Street • ' '' RECEIVED ' REDEVELOPMENT! Ontario, CA 91764 . , (909) 980-1982 / FAX (909) 941-0891 •,:,"`: TO: G�` - - z - FIRM: - r I . FROM: '' 4l:30 DATE: 1/ 1v, TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES (including cover sheet) COMMENTS: _-__—�l/ � l�� r,� 4 ' Tom`. �/4-� - " ect-65,ram 22-2 �r�7�3'f/�- 7" 'L—/� /v u i z l.AK.�— /7 ( ) T� 1. jlic 777 7 lss6Xr�- FAX NUMBER: j. ) - 7 76 2 ORIGINAL SENT VIA MAIL YES / NO P. +909-941-0891 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 545 P02 APR 2F1 'n7. 14:72 �.D.Gel-Well Engineering Construction-Inc, ♦4, • 2829 N.Ganoaks Blvd.Ste 106/101 Burbank,Ca 91504 Phone(818)559-7383•Fax(818)559•5502 • April 21, 2003 Mr. Thomas Holliman Associated Engineers, Inc., 3311 E. Shelby Street Ontario, CA 91764-4872 Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements A.D. General Engineering Inc., Outstanding Claims • • Dear-Mr. Thomas•Holiiinari, I am ready to have my attorney file a lawsuit for our outstanding claims, but before I do this I want to give you one final chance to avoid legal action. There is proof from beginning to end, of what was done to my, company. Such as: interoffice correspondence not meant for me to see, witnesses (not A.D. employees)who heard direction given to remove irrigation line as extra, documentation unanswered, and your own daily reports which say a lot. Regarding our claim for interest for late payment you know as well as I that the requirement •supporting.my claim for late payment is not in the SSPWC or the Job Specifications;however, it's in the California Public Contract Code as well as in the California Prompt-Pay Statutes. Both state that payment is required within 30 days or pay interest, this includes plus interest on the unpaid penalty for each month until paid. A.D. General Engineering will only accept full payment in the amount of $14,184.00 , in order for us not to proceed with legal action. The payment amount is for A.D. Generals claims which have been submitted several times and does not include the claim which has been settled with Ayala Boring Inc.,. You should not combine Ayala's settled claim with our unresolved claims by doing so this delay's payment to Ayala Boring Inc., . You have till the end of work Wednesday April 23, 2003 to give me your written statement of approval for all claims we have submitted.. • incere , ,o . Seo. A. Snyder D MCErVE President A.D. General Engineering • • Construction Inc., APR 2 : 2003 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS No. 0i/— GI m APR. 23. 2003 4:45PM�``L- OOVLE ENGINEERINGNGINEERS 5 rNO. 632 AF.,P 2- ■ —.s 03 07:4 • anigiliellaillegaillinallie 40301 (germ Biwa.Sb I CEr101 •eu►parix,r,a also• th Ii� Phone(618)5t`D,74113•Fir(918)5684$?2 April 21, 2003 �o , O LL1 r16 Mr. Thomas Holliman t� Associated Engineers, Inc., - 33 II E. Shelby Street Ontario, CA 9 i 7'64-1 E72 Subject: South Highland and Jumper Avenge Sewer Improvements A.D. General Engineering Inc , Outstanding Claims Dear Mr. Thomas ITc�7taman, 1 am ready to have my attorney file a lawsuit for our outstanding claims, but before I do want to give you one final chance to avoid legal action this I what was done to my company Such as. interoffice correspondence from or beginning to to end, of witness (not A D employees) who heard direction given to remove irrigation line as extra documentation unanswered, and your own dailyreportsF which say a lot. Regarding our claim for interest for lace a supporting myclaim payment you know as well as I that the requirement g for late payment is not in the SSPWC or the Job Specifications, however, it's in the California Public Contract Code as Well as in the California Prompt-Pay Statutes Both state that payment is required within 30 days or pay interest, this includes plus interest on the unpaid penalty for each month until paid A.D. General Engineering will only accept full a for us not to proceed with legal payment ,n the amount of � � in order f.,al action. The payment amount is for AD Generals claims which have been submitted several times and does not include the claim which has been settled with Ayala Boring Inc.,. You should riot combine Ayala's settled claim with our unresolved claims doing so thus delay's payment to Ayala Doting Inc , by You have till the end of work Wednesday April 23, 2003 to give me your written statement of approval for all claims we have submitted. ($..ineere Sco A. Snyder President A.D. General Engineering Construction Inc, 2CrPR. 23. 2003j.4 45PMING BOYL� tIZiE2N NO. 632 P. 1 1501 Quail'Street "Newport Beech, California 92660 TEL (9.J9) 7��3Dt3 (949) 7,1-7142 _ FAQ 7RA.NSMITTAL To; �1 From: • Date: Time: Total Pages: .V//zd/3 Company/Location: Subject. ?IF hAfrie f - c. . Fax Number: 9t 6 ? Please deliver these pages to the person listed above. If you have difficulty receiving this transmission or if any pages are missing or illegible, plea5e call and ask to speak to the sender listed above. The information contained in this facsimile is intended or.*for the indvidua!(sl named above. it may contain ittfa►mnoon that is confidential or privileged If'you are not an individual named above or the employee responsible far delivering this information to that Individual,you are hereby notified tnat any copying or distribution of the infomrafon contained is this facsimile Is snfc bY hibited.lf you h please notify the senderimrnediate/y by telephone er the number given above_ Thank you toryourcooperation.eve received this facsimile in error Comments: FAX • --100 YEARS PARSONS 16689 Foothill Boulevard BRINCKERHOFF Suite 103 Fontana,CA 92335 909-427-9166 Fax:909-427-9169 harvilla@pbworld.com To:, ,p !� From: George Harvilla G y N/'4✓j- / eG•� / {!/ / v i Je,/ Date: V - 2 9- o Project No.: Fax No.: ? S 7 _7 G .76 No. of Pages (including this page): 2 Subject: L �7,17. �� A / Comments: )) / Over a Century of Engineering Excellence RESPONSE REQUESTED C! April21, 2003 Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. `r Suite 106/101 �� 6�� Burbank, CA 91504 �' t� Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— r✓D Final Claim Response and Final Change Order Dear Mr. Snyder: You were sent a final claim settlement letter dated April 7, 2003 by Associated Engineers, Inc. that outlined our proposed settlement of all outstanding claims on the subject project. We asked that you review the letter and return so we could complete the closeout of this project. As of this writing we have had no response from you regarding this matter. Therefore we have prepared a final change order that reflects the terms of the ,:April 7, 2003 settlement letter as well as deductions for overtime inspection which was requested by A.D..General and agreed to in previous meetings, and failed compaction tests. According to the specifications, Section 211-2.2 stated that, "Retest of areas which have failed compaction will be performed by the Geotechnical Engineer at the Contractor's expense." The total amount of the change order is a net addition of $6,793.15. This includes the following adjustments. 1. Ayala Boring adjustment—an addition of$11,550.11. This amount was agreed upon by Ayala Boring,Inc. and includes the additional bonding amount you requested. 2. A.D. General adjustments for delay and irrigation line—an addition of$3,325.79 for all claims. 3. Adjustment for overtime inspection costs—a deduction of$7,098.75. This amount represents one half of the $14,197.50 in overtime inspection hours on this project that you agreed to in previous meetings were requested by A.D. General Engineering. 4. Adjustment for failed compaction tests—a deduction of$994.00 that represents fourteen re-tests at$71.00/test. In order to bring this matter to a close we are prepared to withdraw our settlement offer dated April 7, 2003 if we have not received the signed change order by May 2, 2003. It is important that we receive a prompt response to this request. If you have any questions please contact me at(909)427-9166. C:\Harvilla\South Highland Sewer\Flnal Settlement Letter with Change Order No.3 4_16_03 c �k The H r ti �. r C 1"" P C7.7S—cam �p ✓� fie • { 1 . Yours truly, George Harvilla, PE Project Manager cc: Curt Ingraham, AE Ralph Roberts, AE • C:\Harvilla\South Highland Sewer\Final Settlement Letter with Change Order No.3 4_16_03 Harvi(la, George From: Tom Holliman [tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Friday,April 18,2003 12:05 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: November 15,2002 0 igli Final Settlement Letter with C... Here is the final settlement letter. When you send me the hard copy of change order no. 2 I can finish the document. I will call you on Monday and let you know where to fax the document and I'll take care of it and send it back to you electronically so you send it to Scott on Tuesday. Thanks, Tom Holliman , Senior Project Manager Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 E. Shelby Street Ontario, CA 91764 ai, d,>-' �(c '- (909)980-1982 e IA G _ /IP c/ o .,-, yo, , I) ("</ ) 4,.. , 'A'( r, r,,,,, f 0,1. `if r C April 16, 2003 Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— Final Claim Response and Final Change Order Dear Mr. Snyder: You were sent a final claim settlement letter dated April 7,2003 by Associated Engineers, Inc. that outlined our proposed settlement of all outstanding claims on the subject project. We asked that you review the letter and return so we could complete the closeout of this project. As of this writing we have had no response from you regarding this matter. Therefore we have prepared a fmal change order that reflects the terms of the April 7,2003 settlement letter as well as deductions for overtime inspection which was requested by A.D. General and agreed to in previous meetings, and failed compaction tests. According to the specifications, Section 211-2.2 stated that, "Retest of areas which have failed compaction will be performed by the Geotechnical Engineer at the Contractor's expense." The total amount of the change order is a net addition of $6,793.15. This includes the following adjustments. 1. Ayala Boring adjustment—an addition of$11,550.11. This amount was agreed upon by Ayala Boring, Inc. and includes the additional bonding amount you requested. 2. A.D. General adjustments for delay and irrigation line—an addition of$3,325.79 for all claims. 3. Adjustment for overtime inspection costs—a deduction of$7,098.75. This amount represents one half of the$14,197.50 in overtime inspection hours on this project that you agreed to in previous meetings were requested by A.D. General Engineering. 4. Adjustment for failed compaction tests—a deduction of$994.00 that represents fourteen re-tests at$71.00/test. In order to bring this matter to a close we are prepared to withdraw our settlement offer dated April 7, 2003 if we have not received the signed change order by May 2, 2003., It is important that we receive a prompt response to this request. If you have any questions please contact me at (909) 427-9166. Yours truly, 1\125\2003 memo\Final Settlement Letter with Change Order No.3 4_16_03 George Harvilla,Harvilla,PE Project Manager cc: Curt Ingraham,AE Ralph Roberts,AE 1\125\2003 memoVinal Settlement Letter with Change Order No.3 4_16_03 Associated Engineers, Inc. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 3311 E.SHELBY STREET,ONTARIO,CA 91764-4872 (909)980-1982 FAX(909)941-0891 April 16, 2003 Mr. George Harvilla PB-Fontana 16689 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 103 Fontana, CA 92335 Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— AE Personnel Change Dear Mr. Harvilla: Effective Friday, April 18, 2003, I will no longer be the AE Project Manager for the subject project. That date will be my final day with Associated Engineers, Inc. and Mr. Curt Ingraham will be taking over my duties as AE Project Manager. As you know, the construction-activities on'this project are complete and only a few.administrative items, remain. T have listed each of the outstanding work items'below with a brief status and' planned actions sfep's I am confident'that Mr Ingraham will be able to provide the high level of professional support for this'project that the City:has,come to expect from Associated Engineers, Inc.'He substituted for me as Project Manager during my trip to Japan last year. 1. Finalize As-Built Drawings-The drawings have been updated and new mylars with revisions shown as "delta revisions" will be sent to you today. 2. Prepare Final Change Order Documents—The final change order document is being prepared and is enclosed for your review. If it is acceptable, please forward • it to A.D. General Engineering. I will also forward it to you electronically so that you can make changes if you think they re needed. 3. Prepare and Send Letter to A.D. General Setting Time Limit for Approval of Settlement of All Claims The letter has been prepared and is attached for your review and signature. 4. Prepare Final Amendment for Associated Engineers, Inc. to Adjust Budget for Overtime Inspection,'and Extended Construction Management Support— This amendment will be`sentto you Mr. Tom Manley, Controller.of Associated Engineers, detailing the final amount of the requested amendment..As of 4/18/03;:this was approximately'$25,000 0:\1OB-NO\2001\01-064\Project Manager Change Letter to George Harvilla 4_16_03.doc PLANNING DESIGNING SURVEYING Beginning Monday, April 21, 2003, I can be reached at Boyle Engineering Corporation, 1131 West Sixth Street, Suite 285, Ontario, CA 91762-1117, Phone (909) 933-5225, Fax (909) 933-5228. If after working with the AE Project Manager, there are still specific questions that you need to ask me,please feel free to contact me. It has been a pleasure to work with you on this important project. • You,' tly, Thomas R. liman, PE Senior Project Manager cc: Curt Ingraham, AE • Tom Manley, AE Ralph Roberts, AE - 0:\]0B-NO\2001\01-064\Project Manager Change Letter to George Harvilla 4_16_03.doc April 16, 2003 Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— Final Claim Response and Final Change Order Dear Mr. Snyder: You were sent a final claim settlement letter dated April 7,2003 by Associated Engineers,Inc.that outlined our proposed settlement of all outstanding claims on the subject project. We asked that you review the letter and return so we could complete the closeout of this project. As of this writing we have had no response from you regarding this matter. Therefore we have prepared a fmal change order that reflects the terms of the April 7, 2003 settlement letter as well as deductions for overtime inspection which was requested by A.D. General and agreed to in previous meetings, and failed compaction tests. According to the specifications, Section 211-2.2 stated that, "Retest of areas which have failed compaction will be performed by the Geotechnical Engineer at the Contractor's expense." The total amount of the change order is a net addition of $6,793.15. This includes the following adjustments. 1. Ayala Boring adjustment—an addition of$11,550.11. This amount was agreed upon by Ayala Boring,Inc. and includes the additional bonding amount you requested. 2. A.D. General adjustments for delay and irrigation line—an addition of$3,325.79 for all claims. 3. Adjustment for overtime inspection costs—a deduction of$7,098.75. This amount represents one half of the $14,197.50 in overtime inspection hours on this project that you agreed to in previous meetings were requested by A.D. General Engineering. 4. Adjustment for failed compaction tests—a deduction of$994.00 that represents fourteen re-tests at$71.00/test. In order to bringthis matter to a close we are prepared to withdraw our settlement offer dated April 7, 2003 if we have not received the signed change order by May 2,2003. It is important that we receive a prompt response to this request. If you have any questions please contact me at(909)427-9166. Yours truly, O:UOB-NO\2001\01-064\Flnal Settlement Letter with Change Order No.3 4_16_03.doc • . ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS INC. George Harvilla,PE Project Manager cc: Curt Ingraham,AE Ralph Roberts,AE 0:\70B-N0\2001\01-064\Final Settlement Letter with Change Order No.3 4_16_03.doc Phone Conversation Memo September 2, 2003 I returned a call to Robert Getter (949-454-3600)with CGVL Engineers. He is working for the City of Ontario. He said A. D. General was low bidder on a pipeline project in Ontario. He asked how they had performed in Fontana. I told him the field crew was good,but working with A. D. General's management has been challenging. Subcontractors have submitted 4 Stop Notices. We are still trying to close this project out 10 months after the last piece of pipe went into the ground, due to claims the City thought were unwarranted and due to the Stop Notices. Now attorneys from the bonding companies and the City Attorney are involved. 6s&-rr Ha rti-r September 2, 2003 C;-,L-y r yr �G < � C 6� 6 - ?�) �' Oj e7.) /7e m�.;s 4. /9,. r,L < f <. S I' A/ r\" Orr/ phone conversation memo 9 2 03.doc Page 1 of 1 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 1:51 PM To: 'Carla Pursel' Cc: Yousuf Patanwala Subject: RE: Sewer acceptance-staff report for 080603 Carla, On the Resolution,the sentence'Whereas,A resolution of Acceptance shall contain the terms of any section consideration which shall apply to the sewer so accepted" the wording sounds strange to me, is it right? Please make the word"improvement"plural in the paragraph which begins"Now,therefore, be it resolved...." On the Action Report, at the end of"Discussion", I would add" the City will be responsible for taking over the maintenance of the sewer improvements, after the contractor's warranty expires. " George Original Message From: Carla Pursel [mailto:cpursel@fontana.org] Sent: Tuesday,July 22, 2003 6:34 PM To: Yousuf Patanwala Cc: Harvilla, George Subject: Sewer acceptance - staff report for 080603 Hi guys - take a look at the attached and make any comments and/or changes and return to me. Thx. cp Carla S. Pursel Administrative Project Coordinator CITY OF FONTANA Redevelopment& Special Projects 909.350.6792 7/23/2003 RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF FONTANA, ACCEPTING THE SEWER IMPROVEMENTS FROM WALNUT STREET TO JUNIPER AVENUE TO SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUE AS PART OF THE CITY SEWER SYSTEM. WHEREAS, Section 23-388(a) of the Municipal Code of the City of Fontana provides that each addition or extension of the sewer system shall be accepted by Resolution of the City Council; and WHEREAS, A Resolution of Acceptance shall contain the terms of any section consideration which shall apply to the sewer so accepted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Fontana, that the sewer improvemenOrom Walnut Street to Juniper Avenue to South Highland Avenue are hereby accepted as part of the sewer system of this city. No special consideration shall apply to this sewer improvement. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of August 2003. READ AND APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: City Attorney I, Beatrice Watson, City Clerk of the City of Fontana, California, and Ex- Off icio Clerk of the City Council, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is the actual resolution duly and regularly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 6th day of August 2003, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: City Clerk of the City of Fontana Mayor of the City of Fontana ATTEST: City Clerk Page 1 of 1 CITY COUNCIL ACTION REPORT AUGUST 6, 2003 FROM: Redevelopment & Special Projects Department SUBJECT: Final Acceptance of Sewer Improvements at Walnut Street to Juniper Avenue to South Highland Avenue RECOMMENDATION: ADOPT RESOLUTION 2003- , ACCEPTING THE SEWER IMPROVEMENTS FROM WALNUT STREET TO JUNIPER AVENUE TO SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUE AS PART OF THE CITY SEWER SYSTEM. COUNCIL GOALS: To invest in the City's infrastructure by providing for the development of new infrastructure. DISCUSSION: On June 17, 2003, the City Council had accepted the aforementioned sewer as complete. The Council now needs to ratify and confirm the action taken at the meeting of June 17th and accept the sewer improvements by resolution pursuant to the Fontana Municipal Code, Section 23-388(a). The sewer improvements have been completed to the satisfaction of the Redevelopment Department and City Engineer. By accepting the sewer improvements as complete by resolution, the City will be responsible for taking over the maintenance of the sewer improvements. i 1-- a� �� < < G„- r FISCAL IMPACTS: None. MOTION: Approve staff recommendation. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: Raymond Bragg Kenneth R. Hunt Redevelopment & Special Projects City Manager Director ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2003- 1 CITY OF FONTANA EMERGENCY INFORMATION FORM PROJECT NAME: South Highland Avenue-Juniper Avenue- Walnut Avenue Sewer Tmprovement(SP46-02) LOCATION: South Highland Avenue to Juniper Avenue to Walnut Avenue CONTRACTOR: A D. GF,NRR AT.F,NCTTNEFRINCT CONSTRT TCTTON ADDRESS: OFFICE PHONE: FAX NO. CONTACT PERSON: RESIDENCE PHONE: MOBIL PHONE NO:JOB SUPERINTENDENT: ADDRESS: MOBIL PHONE: _RESIDENCE PHONE: 24 HOUR DISPATCH: ADDRESS: _ DAY PHONE: RESIDENCE PHONE: CITY OF FONTANA -EMERGENCY PHONE NI TIMERS Police Department: General Information 909-350-7700 Emergencies 911 Public Services Department 909-350-6760 Scott Bangle Cellular: 909-721-8361 Home: 909-795-2251 Anthony Ciotti Cellular: 909-721-8393 Home: 909-481-6612 Special Projects Department. 909-350-6792 George Harvilla Work: 909-427-9166 Home: 909 Raymond Bragg Work: 909-350-7697 Home: 909-981-0380 Engineering Division 909-350-7610 Carlos Navarro Work: 909-350-6632 Cell: 90g-538-1650 Emergency Information The names, addresses and telephone numbers of the contractor and sub-contractors or his representatives, shall be filed with the City Engineer and the Police Department prior to beginning work. The contractor shall provide adequate detours to the satisfaction of the City Traffic Engineer. A detailed plan of such detours shall be submitted to the City Traffic Engineer at least five (5) days prior to the time the contractor wishes to close off the street or in any way restrict the traffic flow. In actual street closures, the submitted plan shall indicate the route of the detour, the character of the temporary pavement where required, and a layout of the locations of signs and lighting. In all other cases,the contractor shall provide adequate traffic flow in both directions. If traffic cannot be maintained the contractor shall provide flagmen whose sole duties consist of directing traffic through and around the work. In all cases, the approval of a suitable plan shall be granted to the contractor prior to the beginning of construction. Failure or refusal by the contractor to comply with the above mentioned requirements shall be sufficient cause for the City Engineer to order the work done by city forces and the cost therein to,be borne by the contractor. cc: See Distribution List V Harvt[Ia,George _. . From: Harvilla, George Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 1:50 PM To: 'Curt Ingraham' Cc: 'Yousuf Patanwala'; 'Carla Pursel' Subject: South Highland Sewer Curt, The Project Management duties for the South Highland Sewer are being transferred from Parsons Brinckerhoff to the City's engineering staff. I met with Yousuf Patanwala from the City last week. Since we are so close to wrapping this up, and since I have a long history with this project, I am going to try to stay involved under Yousuf's oversight. As this project closes,Yousuf requested the following items from Associated Engineers: -Any pertinent files -Copies of field survey staking -Were any monuments moved during construction? -Copyof Compaction Report(George will give his copyto Yousuf) -Copies of Daily Inspection Reports (these were given to Carlos Navarro at the City on a regular basis) Thank you, George Harvilla Illippliplir'' i . \ . '"'I ✓II, i �! r L J / f > �'o / r• I c— C` r;/' C , ,11., , i Tr r -_-- ., J) i I j n _r` ,��lJ /J .6/ • . I • Recording requested by City of Fontana When recorded mail to: City of Fontana 4 Redevelopment & Special Projects Department ' 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, California 92335 No APN Available NOTICE OF COMPLETION Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3086 of the Civil Code of the State of California and authorization of the City Council of the City of Fontana,NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that work on that certain project known as South Highland Avenue and Juniper Avenue Sewer System Improvements (SP-46-02) for the City of Fontana was completed and accepted by the City of Fontana on the 17th day of June , 2003. The said work was performed by A.D.General Engineering in accordance with the terms of written agreement dated the 20th day of June , 2002. STATE OF CALIFORNIA} Dated this lel day of June , 2003 F FONT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO} Ricardo Sandoval, P.E. City Engineer CiA . - , , a Subscribed and sworn to before me Date Tit.. d zh5LR Co .4-.), ),„. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REPORT June 17, 2003 FROM: Redevelopment & Special Projects Department SUBJECT: Final Acceptance of Sewer Improvements at Walnut Street to Juniper Avenue to South Highland Avenue RECOMMENDATION: 1. ACCEPT AS COMPLETE THE WORK PERFORMED BY A.D. GENERAL ENGINEERING, INC. FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE SOUTH HIGHLAND-JUNIPER-WALNUT SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT; AND 2. AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE AND FILE THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR CITY PROJECT BID NO. SB-46-02, AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT. COUNCIL GOALS: To invest in the City's infrastructure by providing for the development of new infrastructure. DISCUSSION: On June 4, 2002, the City Council awarded a construction contract to A.D. General Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $471,045.00, plus a 10% contingency, for the construction of the South Highland-Juniper-Walnut Sewer Improvement Project. The actual project construction work has been completed to the satisfaction of the Public Works Inspector and per the contract documents. The project was completed within budget including tree change orders, -i` Ho'f Which is still under negotiation. The final contract amount has not yet been determined pending the conclusion of the final change order that consists of a small amount of outstanding contractor claims. The final contract total will not exceed the budgeted amount and will be inclusive of all change orders and payment of any outstanding claims. The City Attorney has recommended this action to accept the construction work as complete and file the Notice of Completion so that certain legal timelines for filing stop notices may be ascertained per public contract code. All or a portion of the 10% contract retention money will be released to the contractor thirty-five (35) days after filing of the Notice of Completion with the County Recorder's Office. The amount of retention funds actually released will be determined by the status of any and all stop notices filed against the project as of the date the fund are to be released. If A.D. General provides the City with releases executed by those entities that filed stop notices against this project, the City will release the full amount of retention funds. Otherwise, the City will release the retentions less the statutorily required amount to satisfy the stop notices. FISCAL IMPACTS: Funds are available in the Robert W. Weddle Capital Improvement Projects Fund 425, Project No. 95207 in the FY 2002/03 budget. ITEM: Page 1 of 2 r MOTION: Approve staff recommendation. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: Raymond Bragg Kenneth R. Hunt Redevelopment & Special Projects City Manager Director ATTACHMENT: Vicinity Map Page 2 of 2 I,! �� �- f`/� d , f ( 2- 2p (Yc' 6w , / y r 1 A,> 2_ 4(7 9 '19 0) -7/ 0 $-!;)0v / 9 \ o A 1?0va ? J SAS Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Tuesday, May 20,2003 11:33 AM To: 'scott @ adgenengr.com' Cc: curti@assoc-eng.com Subject: RE:Ayala's Claim Scott, The Change Order has been prepared by Associated. The City is now reviewing/processing it. George Original Message From: scott@adgenengr.com [mailto:scott@adgenengr.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 10:03 AM To: Harvilla, George Cc: curti@assoc-eng.com Subject: Ayala's Claim George, When will I receive Ayala's C.O. paper work? Scott 1 Status of Contractor Claims for South Highland Sewer Page 1 of 1 Harvilla, George From: Ricardo Sandoval [rsandoval@fontana.org] Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 11:01 AM To: Harvilla, George; Ricardo Sandoval Cc: Yousuf Patanwala; Carla Pursel Subject: RE: Status of Contractor Claims for South Highland Sewer Great, I was concerned about puting this issue to bed. A$10K settlement is sometime the easeiest and best thing to do in this case. Time is money.... Thanks Ricardo Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 10:36 AM To: 'Ricardo Sandoval' Cc: 'Yousuf Patanwala'; 'Carla Pursel' Subject: RE: Status of Contractor Claims for South Highland Sewer Ricardo, thestatus of theSouth Highland Sewer Thursdayafternoon at the Weddle Meeting, so I I am scheduled to speak about s a us g don't know if a separate meeting Thursday morning is necessary. In a nutshell,we met with the City attorney. We are going to offer the contractor half of the disputed$10K. He also recommended that the council accept the project so we can finalize the stop notices. Carla is putting it on the agenda for the next council meeting. George Original Message From: Ricardo Sandoval [mailto:rsandoval@fontana.org] Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 10:01 AM To: Yousuf Patanwala; Harvilla, George;Tom Haugh Subject: Status of Contractor Claims for South Highland Sewer When:Thursday, May 22, 2003 9:30 AM-10:30 AM (GMT-08:00) Pacific Time (US &Canada); Tijuana. Where: Ricardo's Office 5/19/2003 Harvilla, George From: scott@adgenengr.com Sent: Monday, May 05, 2003 1:47 PM To: Harvilla@pbworld.com Subject: - Ayala C.O. George - According to SSPWC section 3-3.3 .3 I am allowed a markup to Ayala's settlement in addition to the Bonding markup. You will receive a invoice for $1,200.00 shortly. 1 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2003 11:38 AM To: Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org); Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org); 'Paul Balbach' Cc: Bretz,Timothy; Buchanan, Jack Subject: Tom Holliman Leaving Associated Engineers Tom Holliman, our Construction Manager on the South Highland Sewer, informed me today that he is leaving Associated Engineers to join Boyle Engineers. Curt Ingraham will be taking over the CM responsibilities. Tom's last day is Friday. George HarviIla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 11:07 AM To: 'Tom Holliman'; Scott Snyder(scott@adgenengr.com); Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc- eng.com); Ralph Roberts at Home (coralph@earthlink.net) Subject: Ayala Meeting Let's meet at Associated's office Friday at 2:00. I'll be there. George Original Message From: Tom Holliman [mailto:tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 10:22 AM To: scott@adgenengr.com Cc: Harvilla, George; "Ralph Roberts" Subject: RE: Meeting for Ayala Boring Claim Scott, We can meet at Associated's Office or at the City of Fontana, if you don't have a preference we can all meet here at 3311 E. Shelby Street, Ontario, CA (909) 980-1982. We would prefer to meet with you and Ayala, then excuse them and meet with you to finalize the discussions. We can also discuss your other claims if you like at that time. Tom Holliman Senior Project Manager Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 E. Shelby Street Ontario, CA 91764 (909) 980-1982 Original Message From: scott@adgenengr.com [mailto:scott@adgenengr.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 3:19 AM To: tomh@assoc-eng.com Cc: Harvilla@pbworld.com Subject: Meeting for Ayala Boring Claim Tom, Spoke with Ayala and they are ready to meet this Friday. It must be in afternoon for us, at 2pm. Does this work for you? Were paving Thursday so that's out. Let me know. Associated Engineers, Inc. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 3311 E.SHELBY STREET,ONTARIO,CA 91764-4872 (909)980-1982 FAX(909)941-0891 •4 O v �® March 26, 2003 Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements—Claims Dear Mr. Snyder: We are in receipt of your letter dated March 25, 2003 in which you designate Mr. Bryan Kier to represent A.D. General Engineering Construction Inc. in discussions regarding the Ayala Boring claim. You, however, did not indicate when he would be available to have that meeting. In my previous two emails, I have given you several different times we could convene the meeting. Each time you indicated, you would get back to me when you could make the meeting. As of this writing, you have not specified a meeting day and time. Please let us know when you are prepared to meet. Regarding your decision to pursue legal action regarding your other claims, it is unfortunate that you have made this decision. We are still prepared to discuss the claims, if you change your mind. Yours truly, ASSOCED ENGINEERS INC. : Thomas R. Holliman, PE Senior Project Manager cc: Ray Bragg, City of Fontana '—George Harvilla;PB-Fontana Ralph<Roberts,A-E J.N.,01-064 • 0:\lOB-NO\2001\01-064\AD General Claims Response Letter 3_26_03.doc PLANNING DESIGNING SURVEYING . ; L 1 .:1 1 I I 1 1 1''''I /4/0 ./9.. 61r4. e•••alf (7/;`.".r /47../.5.- Y-/7- 6_7 ,• ,. .i -11-1 i 1 I. 6,- (4r..., -- ,a../c..,,t, 114..-•---„ -cs..4.4 ,C.- . , :,. _...____ ...... 1 1 . . . i 1 ) i -• -,.._ - ..e::= -7,......i e/L-. ,-.... -.4":e,..--e "foe c.d.%e.., I e A gra. , 1 I 1 i,...1— [ I ..1 . 1!1 ; ! ,.. ---li Lfi6'4 70-- (:-.-1_,--. .ge 'n- ce t-Q. /12.1711 — f-'04 ,,! :,!:1,P.../.1 G., f • / fr A> i 1 ef cs/, <,4' .4 X c ,le ....t.4........1 ,...-- te .1-, ../e—e.c., :1 ;!1 1,' 4>c- I—co cc..41.19‘Lt.. 7;e* 4i ....4_45-1C"Se /es"' Ac... ...--e .....%•--, f 7, .....":7; 4.,...A- ............ i.....,....--71 A, cv/y... et • _1!i {I! _ i i 4 • . , . 4 .',-1--- i Harvilla, George From: Tom Holliman [tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 18,2003 8:15 AM To: scott@adgenengr.com Cc: "Ralph Roberts"; Harvilla, George Subject: RE: S. Highland Sewer- Non approval of Claims Scott, We have met with the City and reviewed the various claims you and your subcontractors have made on the project. As requested we would like to meet with you on Friday, March 21, 2003 at 1:00 PM at the offices of Associated Engineers, 3311 E. Shelby Street, Ontario, CA to discuss them. If this time is not convenient for you, or you need more time to prepare for the meeting, please let us know when you will be available during the subsequent week. George Harvilla, Ralph Roberts, and myself will represent the City of Fontana. Because we do not have a contract with Ayala Boring or Olsen Precast representatives from your subcontractors would not be appropriate at the meeting and should not be invited. However, it is our intent to discuss all of the outstanding claims and hopefully resolve them. Please let me know if this time will work for you so I can confirm it with the others, or if not what other times and dates you're available next week so we can confirm an alternate meeting time. Tom Holliman Associated Engineers 1 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 3:58 PM To: 'Torn Holliman' Subject: RE: Claims Status OK Original Message From: Tom Holliman [mailto:tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 3:56 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: Claims Status George, I'll copy Ray Bragg on my letter. Also, according to Scott's fax he doesn't want to talk about his claims anymore but I guess Ayala is still on the table. I'll draft a letter acknowledging Bryan has his spokesman, and expressing our regrets he doesn't want to meet to settle his other claims. I will include a statement that we are willing to discuss his claims if he changes his mind. Tom Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 2:19 PM To: 'Tom Holliman' Cc: 'Ray Bragg' ; 'Carla Pursel' Subject: RE: Claims Status Tom, On your letter to Scott, copy Ray Bragg, not Paul. I agree with your approach. Let me know when you have an actual dollar amount. George Original Message From: Tom Holliman [mailto:tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 11:32 AM To: Harvilla, George Cc: "Ralph Roberts" Subject: Claims Status George, I haven't heard back from Scott as to when he's prepared to meet with us and finalize the claims. I'm going to write him a letter this time and CC his vice president/wife and Paul Balbach notifying them that this will be the third request to meet. As far as a negotiating position I think we should offer to pay for the two days of hand digging that Ayala performed (per Ralph's records) , but without overtime. They unilaterally decided to perform the work as overtime, but I think we could offer them just the straight time hours. The fact that they didn't have to hand dig the S. Highland run may be interpreted by some to indicate that the required hand 1 y ' r digging was the result of a localized change in soils. I think Ralph and I would argue that theycaused the jackingrigtojam which necessitated the hand digging,d gging, but an arbitrator might look at the other crossing as an indication of what is fair versu which is correct per the contract. I will ask Ralph to provide the actual days they hand dug and we can compute the settlement amount from there. Regarding the other claims I recommend we reject the irrigation line, soil tech delays, and progress payment interest. However we could agree to pay for the delay caused by the telephone duct. The duct was lower than we expected and required that AD wait until telephone moved their line. We could argue that he should have potholed it ahead of his work to vertify clearances thus allowing time to have telephone move without causing a delay. But I would be willing to give up the delay money in exchange for dropping any and all other claims so we close this job out. Please give me some feedback on these items. Thanks, Tom Holliman Associated Enigeers 2 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 2:45 PM To: Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org); Carla Purse! (cpursel@fontana.org) Subject: FW: Letter from AD General - I'll fax you the letter when I get it. Original Message From: Tom Holliman [mailto:tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 2:42 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: Letter from AD General George, I just recieved a letter from AD General indicating that they will be appointing Bryan Kier to represent them. They still haven't indicated when they are able to meet. They have also indicated they plan to file legal action for the previously denied claims and therefore don't want to meet to discuss the claim because they state it would be a waste of thier valuable time. It will be interesting to see what Scott's lawyer can provide as a basis for thier claims since Scott has never been able to do so. I'll fax you a copy, if you don't get one directly, for your files. Tom Holliman Associated Engineers I 1 Harvilla, George From: Tom Holliman [tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Friday, March 21,2003 7:36 AM To: scott@adgenengr.com Cc: "Ralph Roberts'; Harvilla, George Subject: RE: S. Highland Sewer- Non approval of Claims Scott, Thanks for getting back to me, please let me know on Monday if Wednesday will work and what time. Tom Holliman Associated Engineers Original Message From: scott@adgenengr.com [mailto:scott@adgenengr.com] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 6:49 PM To: tomh@assoc-eng.com Subject: RE: S. Highland Sewer - Non approval of Claims Tom, I believe your proposal concerning Ayala is the proper manner to conduct this meeting. And your advice to discuss with Ayala ahead of time is a good idea and. appreciated. Monday wont work, I'll know Mon. or Tue. for sure but Wednesday may be good. Scott A. Snyder On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 18:29:32 -0800 (PST) , "Tom Holliman" wrote: > Scott, > If Friday doesn't work then either Monday afternoon or Wednesday of > next week works > for Associated. Regarding Ayala attending the meeting. I don't > have a > problem with them coming in and explaining their claim and > working with them > to get all of the facts straight. However, we cannot negotiate > with them > directly since we don't have a contract with them. We can meet > with you > after they leave the room to discuss a final resolution. It > would be up to > you to represent them in the discussions about final payments. > Since they > are your subcontractor any agreement between the City and Ayala > would not be > binding on AD General. You should meet with Ayala before the > meeting to > discuss their position and obtain some level of agreement with > them so we 1 > can final the project. If you have any questions let me know or / > call George > Harvilla directly. > Thank you, > Tom Holliman > Associated Engineers > Original Message > From: scott@adgenengr.com [mailto:scott@adgenengr.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 1:29 PM > To: torah@assoc-eng.com > Subject: RE: S. Highland Sewer - Non approval of Claims > Tom, > I need to check I may have work scheduled for Friday which I cannot > change. So at this time I don't think Friday will work. I'll get back > with you tomorrow, Thursday 3/20/03, to let you know for sure. > Regarding sub's being present at the meeting. At this time I don't > believe Olson will be asked to attend, I do however believe > Ayala needs to attend. > I believe Ayala needs to present their claim themselves. There is > doubt and questions as to what exactly their claim is on your part and > this will prevent any confusion. I will make them aware they are > present out of courtesy and respect. > I propose the meeting start with Ayala's claim, this I'll have them > leave. Then we may proceed with Associated and A.D. present. > Sincerely, > Scott A. Snyder > On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 12:51:07 -0800 (PST) , "Tom Holliman" wrote: > > > > Scott, > > > > We have met with the City and reviewed the various claims you > and > > your > > subcontractors have made on the project. As requested we would > > like to meet > > with you on Friday, March 21, 2003 at 1:00 PM at the offices of > > Associated > > Engineers, 3311 E. Shelby Street, Ontario, CA to discuss them. If > > this time is not convenient for you, or you need more time to > > prepare for > > the meeting, > > please let us know when you will be available during the subsequent > > week. George Harvilla, Ralph Roberts, and myself will represent the > > City of > > Fontana. Because we do not have a contract with Ayala Boring 2 r or > > Olsen > > Precast representatives from your subcontractors would not be > > appropriate at the meeting and should not be invited. However, it > > is our > intent > > to discuss > > all of the outstanding claims and hopefully resolve them. > Please > > let me > > know if this time will work for you so I can confirm it with the > > others, or > > if not what other times and dates you're available next week so > > we can > > confirm an alternate meeting time. > > > > Tom Holliman > > Associated Engineers 3 RE: S. Highland Sewer - Non approval of Claims Page 1 of 4 Harvilla, George From: Ray Bragg [rbragg@fontana.org] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 1:50 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: S. Highland Sewer- Non approval of Claims I bear no ill-will towards your efforts. Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 1:38 PM To: Ray Bragg (E-mail) Cc: Carla Pursel (E-mail); Tom Holliman (E-mail) Subject: FW: S. Highland Sewer - Non approval of Claims Importance: High Ray, If Jody would just speak to her husband, she would see that we have been in communication with Scott several times this week already (see e-mails below). This is typical of the way A.D. General does business, i.e., lack of communication and no record keeping. Associated and myself have always been responsive to A.D. General, even when they file frivolous claims and accuse Ralph Roberts and me of doing things we did not do. Where was A. D. General's responsiveness when we were waiting four months for them to repair the cracked pipe? I will now get off my soapbox. George • **************************************************************************** ********* From: Ray Bragg To: George Harvilla 3/24/2003 RE: S. Highland Sewer - Non approval of Claims Page 2 of 4 Sent: 3/20/2003 ****************************************** I just got a call from Jody at AD General wondering when a meeting was going to be held on the claim. I told her I believed that a meeting was imminent. She seems upset that Tom Holiman never returns her calls. Ray Ray Raymond Bragg Redevelopment/Special Projects Director City of Fontana 909-350-7697 909-350-7676 (fax) ************************************************************************* From: Tom Holliman To: Scott Snyder Cc: Ralph Roberts; George Harvilla Subject: S. Highland Sewer - Non approval of Claims Sent : Thu 3/20/2003 7:50 a.m. Scott, If Friday doesn't work then either Monday afternoon or Wednesday of next week works for Associated. Regarding Ayala attending the meeting. I don't have a problem with them coming in and explaining their claim and working with them to get all of the facts straight. However, we cannot negotiate with them directly since we don't have a contract with them. We can meet with you after they leave the room to discuss a final resolution. It would be up to you to represent them in the discussions about final payments. Since they are your subcontractor any agreement between the City and Ayala would not be binding on AD General. You should meet with Ayala before the meeting to discuss their position and obtain some level of agreement with them so we can final the project. If you have any questions let me know or call George Harvilla directly. Thank you, Tom Holliman Associated Engineers Original Message From: scott@adgenengr.com [mailto:scott@adgenengr.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 1:29 PM 3/24/2003 RE: S. Highland Sewer Non approval of Claims Page 3 of 4 To: tomh@assoc-eng.com Subject: RE: S. Highland Sewer - Non approval of Claims Tom, I need to check I may have work scheduled for Friday which I cannot change. So at this time I don't think Friday will work. I'll get back with you tomorrow, Thursday 3/20/03, to let you know for sure. Regarding sub's being present at the meeting. At this time I don't believe Olson will be asked to attend, I do however believe Ayala needs to attend. I believe Ayala needs to present their claim themselves. There is doubt and questions as to what exactly their claim is on your part and this will prevent any confusion. I will make them aware they are present out of courtesy and respect. I propose the meeting start with Ayala's claim, this I'll have them leave. Then we may proceed with Associated and A.D. present. Sincerely, Scott A. Snyder On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 12:51:07 -0800 (PST), "Tom Holliman" wrote: > Scott, > We have met with the City and reviewed the various claims you and > your > subcontractors have made on the project. As requested we would > like to meet > with you on Friday, March 21, 2003 at 1:00 PM at the offices of > Associated > Engineers, 3311 E. Shelby Street, Ontario, CA to discuss them. > If this time > is not convenient for you, or you need more time to prepare for > the meeting, > please let us know when you will be available during the > subsequent week. > George Harvilla, Ralph Roberts, and myself will represent the > City of > Fontana. Because we do not have a contract with Ayala Boring or > Olsen > Precast representatives from your subcontractors would not be > appropriate at > the meeting and should not be invited. However, it is our intent 3/24/2003 RE: S. Highland Sewer - Non approval of Claims Page 4 of 4 > to discuss > all of the outstanding claims and hopefully resolve them. Please > let me > know if this time will work for you so I can confirm it with the > others, or > if not what other times and dates you're available next week so > wecan > confirm an alternate meeting time. > Tom Holliman > Associated Engineers 3/24/2003 Ayala Sewer Claim Page 1 of 1 Harvilla, George From: Ray Bragg [rbragg@fontana.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 12:40 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: Ayala Sewer Claim Your negotiated approach at the lower levels is fine. Keep me informed as to your progress. Ray Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 12:38 PM To: 'Ray Bragg' Cc: Carla Purse! (cpursel@fontana.org) Subject: Ayala Sewer Claim Ray, At yesterday's meeting,Yousuf suggested that if the Ayala sewer would require legal counsel, it might be a better approach to come to a negotiated settlement with Ayala rather than paying high legal fees. Their claim is about$17K. Tom Holliman is working on an exact amount, but I think we are going to offer something in the area of$2K-8K. Let me know if you are opposed to this approach and want to take a hard line. We still have about$134K left in the Sewer Fund for this project. Please let me know. Thank you, George 3/18/2003 1015G Poplar Avenue-Fontana; CA..92335 Tel: (909)350-8940 Fax: (909)350-0936 - • 1 State of Califors»a-Lice NO4D3.3105 77 $ORz�* _ State of Nevada License No.37410 G INC `" State of Arizona License No.103981&106123 • • August 29, 2002 A.D. General Engineering, Inc. 2829 North Glenoaks Blvd, Suite 106\101 Burbank, CA 91504 Attention: Scott Reference: Sewer System Improvements SP-46-02 Fontana Subject:. . NOTICE OF CLAIM Gentlemen: We are hereby submitting a Notice of Claim on the above referenced project due to extreme rocky soil conditions. After jacking 80' x 36" casing it is not possible to control line and grade due. to the volume of. rock.. The auger cannot cut through the rocks to excavate the appropriate path for the casing. We must hand mine a portion of the casing in order to install it on designed line and grade. The crew started hand mining this morning. All additional cost for hand mining.to remove ro.ck.will.be forwarded to your office. If you have any questions please feel free to contact our office at 909-350-8940. Sincerely, Ayala Boring, Inc. — Ralph G. Ayala, III • Vice President o1 -.#, Tom Holliman From: • SCOTT SNYDER [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Sunday, September 01, 2002 10:16 AM To: Harvilla@pbworld.com Cc: tomh@assoc-eng.com; ralphr@assoc-eng.com Subject: Boring I have sent along Ayala's claim regarding boring operations. 1 • Tom Holliman From: SCOTT SNYDER[adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Sunday, September 01, 2002 7:17 PM To: Harvilla@pbworld.com Cc: tomh@assoc-eng.com; ralphr@assoc-eng.com Subject: Boring Jodie faxed you a copy of Ayala's letter which states they are making a claim due to the amount of rock's. This necessitated hand work for a portion of the bore on Line C. While boring the rocky condition caused the direction of the bore to kick downward. This had to be corrected by hand which increases their cost's for the bore. They state that in order to bore there must be allowable conditions, which I have to agree with. If you have any questions please call me. Thank you, Scott A. Snyder A.D. Gen. Engr. Const. Inc. 1 • Tom Holliman From: SCOTT SNYDER[adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Sunday, September 01, 2002 7:32 PM To: Harvilla@pbworld.com Cc: tomh@assoc-eng.com; ralphr@assoc-eng.com Subject: Boring of Line- D Ayala has expressed concern about boring Line D using the 24"casing. Since the conditions they encountered on Line C has been so rocky, Ralph Ayala has said he suggest going up in size to 30"- 36". No formal request or cost proposal has been made by Ayala at this time, I will ask on Tuesday for his decision. Scott Snyder 1 Tom Holliman From: SCOTT SNYDER[adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 12:14 PM To: Harvilla@pbworld.com Cc: tomh@assoc-eng.com; ralphr@assoc-eng.com Subject: Re-Bore Casing Size Increase I will relay reply to Ayala Boring. I want to make my stance on the matter known. It is the responsibility of the Agency to specify work that can be done. A contractor cannot be expected to perform a task that is not possible to do. If the bore cannot be made using the size casing stated on the plans, than the City will be responsible for any additional cost's. 1 Tom Holliman From: SCOTT SNYDER [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:56 PM To: tomh@assoc-eng.com Cc: Harvilla@pbworld.com Subject: Boring of Line D I responded to your reply regarding up sizing of the specified bore casing for Line D and I'm waiting a reply. Ayala informed me he is ready for this bore but is on hold due to his concerns of the rocky conditions that may require hand extensive hand work. I reiterate that work specified must be possible to do by within normal and reasonable means by the method specified. As to these conditions being known prior the same must then be said for the Agency and it's representatives. I will say I was on the site several times prior to our work beginning along with my Lead Person Bryan Kier. What is seen is acres of vacant open land. There is top soil all around with abandoned grape vines still growing. Of course we saw sandy conditions along with cobble size rocks but nothing near the extent encountered. Once the top 3-4 feet is excavated the conditions change to extremely sandy and rocky, void of any top soil. The rocks increase in size dramatically from cobble/rip rap size of 6" to two or three times this. Being that I nor Ayala believe the response given prior adequately address the conditions we are encountering. I ask you to reconsider and provide additional direction. SCOTT A. SNYDER A.D. GEN. ENGR. CONST. INC. 1 • Tom Holliman - r From: Harvilla, George[Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 4:48 PM To: Tom Holliman (E-mail) Subject: FAN: boring claim? Tom, what is the status of this? Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 4:02 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: boring claim? George, Back on Oct 18th at the meeting we had at Assoc office I turned in the claim for extra on the boring. Since then I have requested the response at least five times. But as with most everything else I never heard back. I need you to intervene in this and get me a official reply. 1 Tom Holliman From: Tom Holliman Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:45 AM To: 'Harvilla, George' Subject: RE: boring claim? George, I will bring the reply to the lunch meeting so we can discuss it before I mail it to Scott. Just a few points for the record. 1. We have never recieved a "claim" for an extra from AD General for extra costs for boring. Scott handed us a copy of an invoice he recieved from his subcontractor Ayala Boring for alledged extras for the boring subcontract. As such there is no current "claim" being processed at this time. I agreed to provide Scott a letter stating why the claim could not be processed so he pass that information along to Ayala. That research and preparation is taking more time than I thought but is now complete. 2. I had recieved two emails requesting an update on the "boring claim", not "at least five times". 3. As we've discussed on several occasions, and we have informed Scott, a claim requires several things to be approved, per the contract. a. A written notice from the Contractor indicating a changed condition before the work is performed that will be impacted by the changed condition. This was not done. Per Section 3-4, Changed Conditions, Greenbook. b. A written judgement by the Engineer that the examined condition is a changed condition. Couldn't be done because it was never requested. Per Section 3-4, Changed Conditions, Greenbook. c. A change order amount for extra money and time before the extra work is performed. This couldn't be done because the request was made after the extra work was done. Per Section 3-4,. Changed Conditions, Greenbook. d. An explanation from the Contractor (AD General) as to why this changed condition could not be ascertained from the pre-bid inspection, or all of the excavation they did up to the jacking and boring pits. This was never done. e. Evidence that a changed condition actually existed. Ayala alledged they hit big rocks that stopped the auger from moving forward forcing them to hand dig the tunnel, this caused delays and extra costs. To date we have recieved nothing to indicate this was the case, no pictures, no pieces of big rock, nothing but Scott's statement and Ayala's statement that they hit soil conditions that kept them from installing the casing. Of course they did actually install the casing so unless they sent a man into the casing with a jack Yi mmer to blast out the rock (no pieces of broken rock of course was ever shown to the inspector)how did they get the casing in? f. As part of any claim the Contractor must provide backup information to support his charges including material invoices, certified payroll for overtime paid if it was required, equipment logs showing the hours and cost of equipment used in the extra work. In short how they came up with their extra cost. Neither AD General or their subcontractor provided this basic information. They simply provided an invoice for the extra charges. Ayala sent AD General a bill for over $15,000, did Scott ever ask them how they came up with that number? What was their original bid to him? How much of their extra work was actually due to the fact that they prosecuted the work improperly as evidenced by the deviation from the plan alignment and grade and the requirement to rework manhole number 11 to make the pipe fit with the section in the casing? So far all AD General has done is forward a letter to us from thier "employee" per Section 2-3.3 State of Subcontractors, Greenbook, and asked us to respond to it. Given the current posture of AD General (i.e. statements that they are considering legal action) , I believe the appropriate response is to notfy AD General that no "claim" exists and that as soon as they send one that conforms to the requirements of the contract we can respond to it. Let's discuss this at the noon meeting. 1 - v3 Associated Engineers, Inc. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 3311 E.SHELBY STREET,ONTARIO,CA 91764-4872 (909) 980-1982 FAX(909)941-0891 November 25, 2002 Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— Ayala Boring Claim Dear Mr. Snyder: We have reviewed the material you forwarded to us from your subcontractor Ayala Boring in which they have invoiced AD General in excess of $15,000 for extra work, in connection with the subject project. In order for us to address this as a claim, the contract documents require additional materials from you and/or Ayala Boring. It is our. understanding that the invoice from Ayala Boring was based on their assertion that they • experienced changed conditions on the project that necessitated extra work. Please keep in mind that there is no contract between Ayala Boring and the City of Fontana. Ayala Boring is a subcontractor to you and, therefore, is considered an employee of AD General, per the Greenbook. Therefore, the only claims that the City can consider are those from you. Thus far, we have not received a claim for extra work from AD General, only a copy of an invoice from your subcontractor. If you wish to press a formal claim for extra work, please include the following in your request letter. 1. A copy of the written notice that Ayala Boring provided via AD General to the City, indicating a changed condition which required extra work. Per the Greenbook, this letter was required when the changed condition was uncovered by AD General/Ayala and prior to performing the work under the changed conditions. 2. A copy of the judgment made by the Engineer in response to the letter in item agreeing to the changed condition. 0:U0B-NO\2001\01-0641,4a!Boring Letter.doc PLANNING DESIGNING SURVEYING • November 25,2002 Mr.Scott Snyder A.D.General Engineering Construction,Inc. Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— Ayala Boring Claim Page-2 3. Documentation to support the change order amount agreed to between the City and AD General for the extra work. There is no breakdown of labor or equipment showing how the charges were determined. We have no record that the documentation required in items 1 thru 3 of the Greenbook was provided to the City. However, in spite of the lack of documentation, we will still consider a change order for changed conditions if AD General can provide evidence of the changed conditions. According to the verbal reports and emails we received, Ayala Boring was claiming that the soil conditions were different than originally expected. And that those soil conditions prevented them from installing the casing, or at the least slowed their progress to the point that their original.price was no longer valid. If this is correct, please provide copies of soil analysis, photographs from within the casing showing rocks substantially larger than those removed during the excavation of the previous 4,500 feet of sewer main, photographs of the pieces of broken rock removed from the casing, or other physical evidence of the changed condition. This information is required to substantiate the claim there was a changed condition. In addition to the evidence of the changed condition, we need a detailed breakdown from you of the materials, manpower, and equipment used in performing the extra work. All of this information must come under AD General letterhead signed by you. When we receive this package of information, we can determine if any additional compensation is due to AD General. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (909) 980-1982. Yours truly, ASSQCIATED ENGINEERS INC. Thomas R. Holliman, PE Senior Project Manager CC: George Harvilla, PB-Fontana Ralph Roberts, A-E • J.N. 0 1-064 O:UOB4IO\2001\01.O&4'pyal Boring Letter.doc December 3,2002 Mr.Scott Snyder A.D.General Engineering Construction,Inc. Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— Ayala Boring Claim,Revised Response Page-2 In addition to the evidence of the changed condition, we need a detailed breakdown from you of the materials, manpower, and equipment used in performing the extra work that would not have been originally involved in the work. The breakdown received with the claim consisted of daily extra work logs. But the bore was part of the original scope of work so only the incremental increased cost would qualify as an extra cost. In order to validate the extra work amounts, we need to review the original basis of the boring costs, the final total cost, and then we can determine the difference. The difference would be the amount of the claim. When we receive this package of information, we can process this claim. Since this has been an outstanding issue and we concur that we want to move quickly to complete all punch list items, we will expedite out review and response. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at(909) 980-1982. Yours truly, ASS ED ENGINE R INC. Thomas R. Holliman, PE Senior Project Manager CC: George Harvilla, PB-Fontana Ralph Roberts, A-E J.N. 01-064 • O:WB410\2001\01-064\Ayal Boring Letter Supercede Version 12_3_01.doc MEMORY TRANSMISSION REPORT ' TIME : DEC n3 '02 7:50 TEL NUMBER : +909-941-0'Efl NAME : ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS NBR FILE DATE TIME DURATION FGS TO DEFT NBR MODE STATUS 420 44 DEC. 03 17:49 01/00 _55 55n2 EC M OK • Associated Engineers, Inc. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS kik3311 E.SHELBY STREET,ONTARIO,CA 91764-4872 (909)980-1982 FAX(909)941-0891 December 3, 2002 Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction;Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer improvements - . Ayala Boring Claim, Revised Response Dear Mr. Snyder: This letter is being sent as a fallow-up to my telephone call with your office this morning regarding the Ayala Boring claim. This. letter supercedes our previous letter of . November 25, 2002 for the purpose of addressing the specific items needed to consider this claim. We have reviewed the material you forwarded to us from your subcontractor Ayala Boring, in which they have invoiced AD General in excess of $15,000 for extra work, in connection with the: subject project. In order for us to address this claim, the contract documents require additional materials from you and/or Ayala.Boring. It is our understanding that. the invoice from Ayala Boring was based on their assertion • that they experienced chanpd conditions on the project that necessitated extra work. According to the verbal reports and emails we received, Ayala Boring was claiming that the soil conditions were different than originally expected. And that those soil conditions prevented them from installing the casing, or at the least slowed their progress to the point that their original price ,vas no longer valid . In order to determine if a changed condition existed under the terms of the contract we must have evidence to support that allegation. Please provide copies of soil analysis, photographs from within the casing showing rocks substantially larger than those removed during the excavation of the previous 4,500 feet of sewer main, photographs of the pieces of broken rock removed from the casing, or other physical evidence of the changed condition. This information is required to substantiate the claim there was a changed condition. In addition. -you and/or Ayala. Boring must nrovicle a narrative • A.D.General Engineering Construction Inc., ♦♦♦ 2829 N.Glenoaks Blvd.Ste 106/101 •Burbank;Ca 91504 Phone(818)559-7383+Fax(818)559-5502 January 2, 2003 Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 E. Shelby Street Ontario,.CA 91764 Subject: South Highland and Juniper Ave. Sewer Improvements Ayala Boring Claim Dear Mr. Holliman, A.D. General Engineering.Const.,Inc,is forwarding_the.additional documentation that was requested for the Ayala Boring Claim. Ayala Boring Inc., has provided photos, Daily Extra Work Reports. If you should have any questions please contact us. Sincerely, Jodie Snyder Vice.President. —= .�`"'ice. 10150 Poplar Avenue Fontana, CA 92335 [� Tel: (909)350-8940 Fax: (909)350-0936 State of California License No.388577 State of Nevada License No.37410 � C State of Arizona License No.103981&106123 December 9, 2002 A.D. General Engineering, Inc. 2829 North Glenoaks Blvd, Suite 106\101 Burbank, CA 91504 Attention: Scott Snyder Reference: Sewer System Improvements SP-46-02 Fontana Subject: Response to Associated Engineers letter dated December 3,2002 Gentlemen: We are in receipt of the letter from Thomas R. Holliman of Associated Engineers in response to Ayala Boring's Notice of Claim dated April 29, 2002. Mr. Holliman makes reference to our claim as "changed conditions." Please be advised, Ayala Boring's claim is based on the method of installation. The specifications are very specific as to the method to be used. Specification Section 306-8.1.1 specifically requires an "unmanned • entry method." Ayala Boring bid the scope of work in accordance to plans and specifications prepared by Associated Engineers. As a result, due to existing soil conditions, the method had to be changed from an "unmanned entry method" to a hand mine installation. The change in method resulted in an increase cost of $17,504.96. • The contractor is expected to bid the work as required by plans and specifications. The design engineer is responsible to design the work in a manner that can be accomplished. Ayala Boring hereby demands payment for extra cost incurred per the change in method as designed. • We have enclosed copies of the Daily Extra Work Reports for extra time for labor and equipment per the change in method as designed. The photographs will follow by mail. If you have any questions please feel free to contact our office at 909-350-8940. Sincerely, Ayala Boring, Inc. Cam..• ''�.. Ralph G. Ayala,III Vice President Enclosures AYALA BORING,INC. 10150 Poplar Avenue,Fontana,California 92335 State of California License No.388577 State ofNevada License No.37410 State of Arizona License No.103981&106123 DAILY EXTRA WORK REPORT 8/29/2002 PROJECT NAME:Sewer System Improvements SP-46-02 LOCATION:Fontana DESCRIPTION:Hand mining to remove rock obstructions.10.5 hours extra time TYPE OF UNIT QUANTITY DAYS UNIT PRICE EXTENSION HOURS LABOR FOREMAN ST 1 8 $58.83 $ 470.64 FOREMAN OT 1 2.5 $81.63 $ 204.08 LABORER ST 3 8 $40.27 $ 966.48 LABORER OT 3 2.5 $54.73 $ 410.48 SUBTOTAL $ 2,051.67 20%MARK-UP $ 410.33 TOTAL $ 2,462.00 EQUIPMENT 14P HYDRAULIC TRUCK CRANE WITH CLAM BUCKET/AUX HYD PWR UNIT 1 8 $75.00 $ 600.00 36-INCH HYDRAULIC TRACK MACHINE 1 8 $55.00 $ 440.00 24-INCH HYDRAULIC BLOWER 1 1 $110.00 $ 110.00 GAS MONITOR 1 1 $75.00 $ 75.00 $ $ - • $ - $ $ - $ $ $ $ $ SUBTOTAL $ 1,225.00 MATERIAL $ - $ $ $ $ $ $ SUBTOTAL $ GRAND SUBTOTAL $ 1,225.00 15%MARK-UP I I I J$ 183.75 TOTAL $ 1,408.75 I GRAND TOTAL $ 3,870.75 AYALA BORING,INC. 10150 Poplar Avenue,Fontana,California 92335 State of California License No.388577 State ofNevadaLicense No.37410 State of Arizona License No.103981&106123 DAILY EXTRA WORK REPORT 8/30/2002 PROJECT NAME:Sewer System Improvements SP-46-02 LOCATION:Fontana DESCRIPTION:Hand mining to remove rock obstructions.11 hours extra time TYPE OF UNIT QUANTITY DAYS UNIT PRICE EXTENSION HOURS LABOR FOREMAN ST 1 8 $58.83 $ 470.64 FOREMAN OT 1 3 $81.63 $ 244.89 LABORER ST 3 8 $40.27 $ 966.48 LABORER OT 3 3 $54.73 $ 492.57 $ SUBTOTAL $ 2,174.58 20%MARK-UP $ 434.92 TOTAL $ 2,609.50 EQUIPMENT 14P HYDRAULIC TRUCK CRANE WITH CLAM BUCKET/AUX HYD PWR UNIT 1 8 $75.00 $ 600.00 36-INCH HYDRAULIC TRACK MACHINE 1 8 $55.00 $ 440.00 24-INCH HYDRAULIC BLOWER 1 1 $110.00 $ 110.00 GAS MONITOR 1 1 $75.00 $ 75.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ • • $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ SUBTOTAL $ 1,225.00 MATERIAL $ $ - $ $ - $ $ SUBTOTAL $ GRAND SUBTOTAL $ 1,225.00 15%MARK-UP I I I I$ 183.75 I (TOTAL $ 1,408.75 GRAND TOTAL $ 4,018.25 AYALA BORING,INC. 10150 Poplar Avenue,Fontana,California 92335 • State of California License No.388577 State ofNevada License No.37410 State of Arizona License No.103981&106123 DAILY EXTRA WORK REPORT 9/4/2002 PROJECT NAME:Sewer System Improvements SP-46-02 LOCATION:Fontana DESCRIPTION:Hand mining to remove rock obstructions.11 hours extra time TYPE OF UNIT QUANTITY DAYS UNIT PRICE EXTENSION HOURS LABOR FOREMAN ST 1 8 $58.83 $ 470.64 FOREMAN OT 1 3 $81.63 $ 244.89 LABORER ST 2 8 $40.27 $ 644.32 LABORER OT 2 3, $54.73 $ 328.38 SUBTOTAL $ 1,688.23 20%MARK-UP $ 337.65_ TOTAL $ 2,025.88 EQUIPMENT 14P HYDRAULIC TRUCK CRANE WITH CLAM BUCKET/AUX HYD PWR UNIT 1 8 $75.00 $ 600.00 36-INCH HYDRAULIC TRACK MACHINE 1 8 $55.00 $ 440.00 24-INCH HYDRAULIC BLOWER 1 1 $110.00 $ 110.00 GAS MONITOR 1 1 $75.00 $ 75.00 $ $ $ _ $ $ $ - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ _ SUBTOTAL $ 1,225.00 MATERIAL $ $ $ $ $ $ _ $ $ $ • SUBTOTAL $GRAND SUBTOTAL $ 1,225.00 15%MARK-UP I I I$ 183.75 TOTAL $ 1,406.75 I GRAND TOTAL $ 3,434.63 AYALA BORING,INC. 10150 Poplar Avenue,Fontana,California 92335 State of California License No.388577 State of NevadaLicense No.37410 State of Arizona License No.103981&106123 DAILY EXTRA WORK REPORT 9/5/2002 PROJECT NAME:Sewer System Improvements SP-46-02 • LOCATION:Fontana DESCRIPTION:Hand mining to remove rock obstructions.8 hours extra time TYPE OF UNIT QUANTITY DAYS UNIT PRICE EXTENSION HOURS LABOR FOREMAN ST 1 8 $58.83 $ 470.64 FOREMAN OT $81.63 $ LABORER ST 2 8 $40.27 $ 644.32 • LABORER OT $54.73 $ $ SUBTOTAL $ 1,114.96 20%MARK-UP $ 222.99 TOTAL $ 1,337.95 EQUIPMENT 14P HYDRAULIC TRUCK CRANE WITH CLAM BUCKET/AUX HYD PWR UNIT _ 1 8 $75.00 $ 600.00 36-INCH HYDRAULIC TRACK MACHINE 1 8 $55.00 $ 440.00 24-INCH HYDRAULIC BLOWER 1 1 $110.00 $ 110.00 GAS MONITOR 1 1 $75.00 $ 75.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ SUBTOTAL $ 1,225.00 MATERIAL $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ SUBTOTAL $GRAND SUBTOTAL $ 1,225.00 15%MARK-UP I I I I$ 183.75 TOTAL $ 1,408.75 1 I i GRAND TOTAL $ 2,746.70 AYALA BORING,INC. 10150 Poplar Avenue,Fontana,California 92335 State of California License No.388577 State ofNevada License No.37410 State of Arizona License No.103981&106123 DAILY EXTRA WORK REPORT 9/6/2002 PROJECT NAME:Sewer System Improvements SP-46-02 LOCATION:Fontana DESCRIPTION:Hand mining to remove rock obstructions.11 hours extra time TYPE OF UNIT QUANTITY DAYS UNIT PRICE EXTENSION HOURS LABOR FOREMAN ST 1 8 $58.83 $ 470.64 FOREMAN OT 1 3 $81.63 $ 244.89 LABORER ST 2 8 $40.27 $ 644.32 LABORER OT 2 3 $54.73 $ 328.38 $ $ SUBTOTAL $ 1,688.23 20%MARK-UP $ 337.65 TOTAL $ 2,025.88 EQUIPMENT 14P HYDRAULIC TRUCK CRANE WITH CLAM BUCKET/AUX HYD PWR UNIT 1 8 $75.00 $ 600.00 36-INCH HYDRAULIC TRACK MACHINE 1 8 $55.00 $ 440.00 24-INCH HYDRAULIC BLOWER 1 1 $110.00 $ 110.00 GAS MONITOR 1 1 $75.00 $ 75.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ • _ $ • $ $ $ SUBTOTAL $ 1,225.00 MATERIAL $ $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ $ $ $ SUBTOTAL $ GRAND SUBTOTAL $ 1,225.00 15%MARK-UP I I I$ 183.75 TOTAL $ 1,408.75 GRAND TOTAL $ 3,434.63 Associated Engineers, Inc. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS kik3311 E.SHELBY STREET,ONTARIO,CA 91764-4872 (909)980-1982 FAX(909)941-0891 January 28, 2003 Mr. Scott.Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— Ayala Boring Claim. Dear Mr. Snyder: We have reviewed the material you forwarded to us from your subcontractor, Ayala Boring, in which they have responded to our assessment of their claim for extra charges in connection with the boring operations on the subject project. According to Ayala Boring's December 9, 2002 letter, "Ayala Boring's claim is based on the method of installation". Therefore, they are contending that our previous remarks regarding changed conditions do not apply. According to Ayala Boring, they bid the work in accordance with Specification Section 306-8.1.1, which required an "unmanned entry method". Further that, as a result of soil conditions, they had to "change" the method from an "unmanned entry method" to a hand mine installation. Given this basis, we have reviewed their claim against the contract documents and have the following observations. 1. Ayala's subcontract bid was part of AD General's bid and was based upon the site conditions at the time the bid was prepared. At no time prior to the bid did Ayala or AD General indicate that the work could not be performed in accordance with the plans and specifications. We have no record of a request for a clarification, additional information, or any exception to the bid from either Ayala Boring or AD General indicating that the work could not be performed as specified. Given the lack of exceptions and Ayala's statement that they bid the plans and specifications, we can only conclude that Ayala and AD General had assured themselves that they were in a position to perform the work at the time of the bid. \\ASSOC-WIN2K\support!\30B-NO\2001\01.064\Ayal Baring Letter-3AN 28,2003.doc PLANNING .DESIGNING SURVEYING January 2S.2003 • Mr.Scott Snyder A.D.General Engineering Construction,Inc. Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— Ayala Boring Claim Page Therefore, any circumstances that resulted in changes to means and methods could only have been discovered or occurred after the bid was submitted and accepted. 2. Given that no request or claim was submitted by Ayala Boring or AD General during the beginning weeks of the project, we have to conclude that the condition that prompted the change in construction methods had to have been discovered at the time the casing installation began. If the soil conditions were different than those observed at the time of bid, then we would have expected to receive a request'for a change in construction methods before the work began. The casings were installed at the end of the project after the installation of thousands of feet of sewer pipeline. Ayala had ample opportunity to visit the site and observe the soil conditions at the depth of the casing installation before mobilizing on site. However, neither AD General who excavated the thousands of feet of trench, nor Ayala Boring, notified the City or the City's designated representative that the soils being encountered were different than those observed at the time of the bid. 3. Ayala states that they had to change the method of installation from an unmanned operation to a hand mining operation. If that is the case, Ayala was obligated, through AD General, to notify the City and the Engineer in writing before the change was made and get the anticipated extra cost associated with that change and the alternative construction method approved by the Engineer in writing before changing methods. These requirements are clearly stated in Section 3 — Changes in Work, of the Green Book. "3-1 CHANGES REQUESTED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 3-1.1 General. Changes in specific methods of construction may be made at the Contractor's request when approved in writing by the Engineer. Changes in the Plans and Specifications, requested in writing by the Contractor, which do not materially affect the work and which are not detrimental to the Work or to the interests of the Agency may be granted by the board to facilitate the Work, when approved in writing by the Engineer. • 3-1.2 Payment for Changes Requested by the Contractor. If such changes are granted, they shall be made at a reduction in cost or at no additional cost to the Agency. Nothing herein shall be constructed as granting a right to the Contractor to demand acceptance of such changes." \\ASSOC-WIN2K\supportlUOB-NO\2001\01-064\Ayal Boring Letter-JAN 28,2003.doc January 28,2003 • Mr.Scott Snyder A.D.General Engineering Construction,Inc. Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— Ayala Boring Claim Page-3 According to Ayala, they made a unilateral decision to change the specified construction method without obtaining approval of the change or any costs associated with the change. Further, Section 3-1.2 states only changes that result in a reduction or no cost would be approved. Neither condition was apparently met since Ayala is now claiming additional costs for their change. 4. Finally, Ayala has included photographs of the rocks that they assert were removed from the casing, and although not explicitly stated, inferring that the rocks prompted the construction method change. We have examined the photographs and concluded that the rocks in the photographs are consistent with the rocks found in and around the surface of the project site, and consistent with the size and type of rocks found below ground during the full length of the project. The bid documents, and the specifications place the responsibility on AD • General and Ayala to thoroughly investigate the site at the time of the bid. The Proposal for Construction of South Highland Avenue and Juniper Avenue Sewer System Improvements; Page P-1, Paragraph 2 states, "BIDDER declares that this proposal is based upon a careful examination of the work site, Plans, Specifications, Instructions to Bidder, and Contract Documents." Paragraph 4 states, • • "BIDDER certifies that it has visited the construction site .and familiarized itself with local conditions under which the work is to be performed. Further, BIDDER certifies that it will be responsible for incorporating into it's bid whatever contingencies which are discernible by a reasonable investigation." Finally, the Contract Agreement for construction of South Highland Avenue and Juniper Avenue Sewer System Improvements, Bid No. SP-46-01, Article III, • states, "CONTRACTOR agrees to receive and accept the prices set forth in the PROPOSAL BID SHEET(S) as full compensation for furnishing all materials, performing all work, and fulfilling all obligations hereunder. Said compensation shall cover all expenses, losses, damages, and consequences arising out of the nature of the work during its progress or prior to its acceptance including those for well and faithfully completing the work and the whole thereof in the manner and time specified in the aforesaid contact documents; and also including those arising from actions of the elements, unforeseen difficulties or obstructions encountered in the prosecution of the work, suspension of discontinuance of the work, and all other unknowns or risk of any description connected with the work." \\ASSOC-WIN2K\supportl\3OB-NO\2001\01.064\Ayal Boring Letter-JAN 28,2003.doc • January 28.2003 Mr.Scott Snyder A.D.General Engineering Construction.Inc. Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— Ayala Boring Claim Page-d Submitting the bid and executing the agreement are evidence that the Contractor could construct the casings as specified unless there was a changed condition that could not be determined at the time of the bid. Based on our field observations and soils reports we continue to assert that the conditions encountered were consistent with the observable soil conditions and any provisions in the construction methods and means necessary to accomplish the work under those conditions were included in the bid. Since Contractor made the change in methods without approval by the City and we cannot concur that the soil conditions changed from those observable at the time of the bid the claim for additional compensation cannot be recommended for approval to the City of Fontana. Yours truly, • ASSOCI'A,TED ENGINEERS INC. y: ash" • ' nb l r•.Jy _ �" Thomas R. Holliman, PE Senior Project Manager cc: George Harvilla, PB-Fontana Ralph Roberts, A-E J.N. O 1-064 \\ASSOC-WIN2K\supportl\JOB-NO\2001\01.064\Aye!Boring Letter-JAN 28,2003.doc 10-150 Poplar Avenue Fontana; CA 92335 f Tel: (909)350-8940 Fax: (909)350-0936 ; State of California t icense No:388577 t��rr State of Nevada License No.37410 JA C M State of Arizona License No.103981 Sc 106123 February 5,2003 A.D. General Engineering,Inc. 2829 North Glenoaks Blvd,Suite 106\101 Burbank,CA 91504 Attention: Scott Snyder Reference:. Sewer System Improvements SP-46-02 Fontana • Subject: Response to Associated Engineers' letter dated January 28,2003 Gentlemen: We are in.receipt of the letter from.Thomas R. Holliman of.Associated Engineers in response to Ayala Boring's letter dated December 9, 2002. Associated Engineers is taking the position that Ayala Boring.should have submitted a claim prior to commencement of the bore. Associated Engineers is failing to recognize the fact that Ayala Boring successfully bored 80' x 36"casing before encountering conditions that required a change in.the.method of installation. A claim was not warranted prior to commencement of the bore as conditions that required a change in the method of installation were not encountered until after installing 80'x 36"casing. Associated Engineers is also taking the position that Ayala Boring never provided written notice. This is.incorrect as Ayala.Boring.faxed and mailed.the.Notice_of.Claim on August 29,2002,the day it was determined hand mining was required to complete the bore,copy enclosed. Associated Engineers was.fully aware Ayala.Boring.was.proceeding.and.incurring,significant extra cost as indicated by signed daily tickets referencing "extra time". Associated Engineers deliberately ignored.Ayala. Boring's.Notice. of Claim..until after.the work.was.complete as they failed to respond until December 3,2002,ninety-six(96)days after the Notice of Claim was submitted. Ayala Boring.fully understands that in a claim situation the claimant has a responsibility to provide written notice to the governing authorities immediately upon.becoming aware of a problem. Ayala Boring provided written notice and_continued performing, as they were never directed otherwise. Associated Engineers' denial after the fact is unjustified. Ayala Boring is well within its legal. rights and will pursue this matter as necessary. Perhaps a meeting should be arranged for further discussion to resolve this matter. Sincerely, Ayala Boring,Inc.' Ralph G. Ayala,III Vice President Enclosures %Mar 07 03 12: 42p O0000 0(300000(iii lt3(10. 559 :) r0P p f1F -1@7-2t%103 lit•c 4.7 i;+ NM lily , -109 ",F) f•J`a ib 1'-f7' 2 ` A 0150 Poplar Avraiue• •untana.California 92.33 S-+1"t95 • ieleplinne• (909) ';'t3.8940 Facsiicnile: (909j .i5() 0936 T. in 4 Las I I(•fNS X. sin 1:1(FNt1 ,PCs fOn,. S',AiC tlr 'i vA4i March 7, 2003 , A.D. General E-ngsneeriog ?'Onstructiorr 1r:: 2829 North Glenoaks Boulevard Suite 106,11.3 Surhank, CA 01504 • Attention. Scott Snydei " Reference: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvement, Fontana Deut Mc Snyder • • We are in receipt of a copy Of Associated Engineer's. lnc.'s letter dated March 6, 2003. Upon review of the letter. it k obvious that Associated Engineers is incorrectly stating the record by miss-interpreting, our prior "notices- and various correspondences Our August 29, 2002 icti--1 L•unsututccl °is� +Etta.ial Notice of Claim Ayala was not directed to . 1. Cease all work. pending turthcr 2. Request additional snfoi matron. As for our description in Ilk- claim, the ",,..hange. :,rr method" was .a dirc:c c result horn a "changed condition' which required a ` rnannera entry" Ayala acted :•esponsibly by properly- notifying fhc engineer upon ctis.','Ucre, at a changed condition and "did not'' disturb the condition. Associated Engineering i nored the norsz:; and All correspondence untl l the jot> was completed, .Associated E.ngincc rs is creatively itrcmpting to invalidate a legitimate claim. We pi viously .uggr.stcd 0121t a trareting tic arranged for resoiuti(rn Again we suggest that a meeting be arranged to discuss/negotiate an equitable settlement. Please note that Ayala has tiled a 'Stop Notice pending settlement of this matter lnco• ly, `, .onus 1rt • per . yala Prey dent Li RGA/kah • it tiat ?' �. rar 07 ld 12: 42p cloop000mm0000noglopo . 558 5;)0P p 1 • A.O.General Engineering Cons inaction Mc •** Z£129 N ..,ienuaks Blvd k (70/1,„' * Buibar*,6a 91114 >>hone(818)5514. • dX 8)6rogto502 FA COVER SHEET Ma h 5, 2003 FA TO: Torn Holliman Associated Enginect 909 94 1-08(2‘ FR VI: Jodie Snyder P ;cs Mar u i 03 ic: rtzp. 0 00(1r3�3i30000(.3(3imi3F3t3f?r3 . y:i9 :�;)0? p . r ai General Engineering Ceminructien In ••• 7.8A)N Glenoaka Blvd >tr, I00/:''i1 • fiur nk,La 91504 Phone)(818)SAX.,7W♦3 1x(818) 2 M ch 7, 2002 At iciated Engineers. Inc 33 E Shelby Street Or a to, CA 91704 RE South Highland Sewer improvements Sewer. Repair Ayala Boring"Claim for Extra Work" De Mr. Holliman, I at faxing over a copy of Ayala Boring response to Our letter dated March 6, 200; regarding the. Extra Work ('lain, Ayala Boring has requested again that a meeting be arrange to resolve this latter Please advise as soon as possible as to when a meeting will be schedule Yoi prompt attention in this matter is required • • Sin( >< l o 9 nyder Vie( 'resident A.D.General Engineering Construction Inc., ♦•♦ 2829 N.Glenoaks Blvd.Ste 106/101 ♦ Burbank,Ca 91504 Phone(818)559-7383♦Fax(818)559-5502 February 7, 2003 FAX COVER SHEET: FAX TO: Tom Holliman/Associated Engineers, Inc 909 941-0891 FROM: Jodie Snyder RE: Response From AYALA Boring Inc, See attached letter from Ayala Boring regarding the"Claim For Extra Work". 3 Pages D CrE PA/IF r17)) FEE 2003 ASSOCIATEDi� la° Job Mar 14 03 12: 03p 00000000000000000000. 559-5502 p.• Issiesais Ossilmelise 2829 N.Glenoaks Blvd.Ste 108ii01 ♦ tiurbanK,Ca 91534 • Phone(818)559-7383•Fax(818)559-5502 Ma h 14, 2003 As: ciated Engineers, Inc. 33- E. Shelby Strcct On rio, CA 91764 RE South Highland Sewer Improvements Sewer Repair Ayala Boring"Claim For Extra Work" De Mr, Holliman.. • Or March 7, 2003 you were notified again that Ayala Boring requested a meeting to be schedule to scuss there claim. Associated Engineers.has failed to acknowledge this request again. Yc r prompt attention in this matter is required. Si! erely,, i • -, �> Jo "Snyder) Vt .President A.D.General Engineering.Construction Inc., ♦♦♦ 2829 N.Glenoaks Blvd.Ste 106/101 ♦ Burbank,Ca 91504 Phone(818)559-7383♦Fax(818)5595502 November 13, 2002 City of Fontana 8353 Sierra Ave. Fontana, CA 92335 Project: South Highland Avenue and Juniper Avenue Sewer System Improvements/Bid SP-46-02 Iange Order No: 4 Invoice No: 1516 P.O. No: 03-6P001 Additional.charg_e..fram_Olsen Precast_due to_the_"Telephone.Line_Cgnflict". Manholes were to be poured 3 at a time but due to the telephone line conflict this could not be done. Additional cost incurred is $ 950.00. • Total Charge from Olsen Precast $ 950.00 A..D_General..Eng.-Ma\rk Up (15%) $ 135.00 Total Amount Due. $1,035.00 OLSON PRECAST COMPANY 2750 MARION DRIVE LAS VEGAS, NV 89115 C(Yt)-1 Invoice 2995 Bill to: Job: 20-02-066 A.D. GENERAL ENGINEERING HIGHLAND & JUNIPER SEWER 2829 N GLEN OAKS BLVD#106 BURBANK, CA 91504 Invoice#: 2995 Date: 08/30/02 Customer P.O.#: Payment Terms: NET DUE 30 DAYS Salesperson:CALIFORNIA SALES Customer Code: 000488 Remarks: Quantity Description U/M Unit Price Extension 2.00 4' SSMH EA 1,000.00 2,000.00 2.00 . TWO AT A TIME POUR EA 225.00 450.00 Total: 2,450.00 4 ��� �� . Aiot, ,,p,o7.51,143, yY ., gip.<�a...»`^• PLEASE REMIT TO: Dept.# 2296 Los Angeles,California 90084-2296 Print Date: 08/30/02 Page: 1 • �N PRECAST COMPANY 2750 MARION DRIVE L_o v \ LAS VEGAS, NV 89115 f Invoice 3142 Bill to: Job: 20-02-066 A.D. GENERAL ENGINEERING HIGHLAND & JUNIPER SEWER 2829 N GLEN OAKS BLVD#106 BURBANK, CA 91504 Invoice#: 3142 Date: 09/26/02 Customer P.O.#: Payment Terms: NET DUE 30 DAYS Salesperson:CALIFORNIA SALES Customer Code: 000488 Remarks: Quantity Description U/M Unit Price Extension 1.00 5' SSMH EA 1,940.00 0 1,940.00 1.00 .4' SSMH EA 1,000.00 1,000.00 2.00 ONE AT A TIME POURS EA 225.00 450.00 Total: 3,390.00 • 4,4 1. 6- " x � rTgi s ' ��fi -4kopt, kit a Av"ralso k • , Or PLEASE REMIT TO: Dept.# 2296 Los Angeles,California 90084-2296 Print Date: 09/26/02 Page: 1 A.D.Cenral Engineering Construction Inc.,. ♦♦♦ 2829 N.Glenoaks Blvd.Ste 106/101 ♦Burbank,Ca 91504 Phone(818)559-7383♦Fax(818)559-5502 October 23, 2002 City of Fontana 8353 Sierra Ave. Fontana, CA 92335 Project: South Highland Avenue and Juniper Avenue Sewer System Improvements/Bid SP-46-02 Change Order No: 3 Invoice No: 1515 P.O. No: 03-6P001 Additional work for Replacement of Irrigation Line on Juniper Ave. Lump Sum price of$ 8,700.00. price includes labor, materials, and equipment. Total Amount Due$8,700.00 Sincerely,. . _ Reviewed By ��''` Tom Holliman Scott A. Snyder Associated Eng. President A.D. General Engineering. Approved By City of Fontana NECEZED OCT 2 5 2002 ASSOCIATED Eli ENGINEERS Job No..W Associated Engineers, Inc. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 3311 E.SHELBY STREET,ONTARIO,CA 91764-4872 (909)980-1982 FAX(909)941-0891 November 1, 2002 • Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— Claim for Extra Work for Replacement of Irrigation Line on Juniper Avenue Dear Mr. Snyder: We have reviewed your claim in the amount of $8,700.00 for the subject work and have concluded that the claim does not qualify for approval under the terms of Contract Number SP- 46-02. The terms of the contract provide specific requirements and conditions that must be met before a claim for extra work can be approved. Those requirements and conditions are spelled out in the following referenced section of the contract. Section 5-4, Relocation, of the latest edition of the "Greenbook" which applies to this project, "Temporary or permanent relocation or alternation of utilities requested by the Contractor for its convenience shall be its responsibility and it shall make all arrangements and bear all costs." The new sewer pipeline being laid across the irrigation main was more than five feet below the irrigation pipe and its encasement. Further, the standard joint length of pipeline being laid was longer than the approximately three-foot width of the encasement. Instead of tunneling under the conduit, as you did with the PacBell conduit interference at Juniper and Walnut, and the curb and gutter on Juniper to install the house laterals, you elected to remove the pipeline for your convenience. From our review of the work, it appears that your decision was based on your desire not to remove and reset the shield you were using for shoring the trench wall. Therefore, in order to continue to "drag" the shield, you removed the pipeline. Keeping in mind that you determine your own methods of construction, it is clear that this removal and replacement was not "required" to complete the project as designed. Further, there is no reason to believe that the sewer pipe could not be installed without removing the irrigation pipe. Therefore, Section 5-4 places the full cost of the replacement on the Contractor. \\ASSOC-WINNK\supportl\]OB-NO\2001\01-064\Rejection of change order for irrigation line 10_29_02.doc • PLANNING DESIGNING SURVEYING November l,2002 Mr.Scott Snyder A.D.General Engineering Construction,Inc. Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— Claim for Extra Work for Replacement of Irrigation Line on Juniper Avenue Page-2 If you wish to dispute these findings, you can exercise your right to dispute this work under the terms of the contract. Section 3-5 contains the provisions for handling situations where the Contractor and the Agency are unable to reach agreement on disputed work. Yours truly, ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS, INC. • Thomas R. Holliman, PE Senior Project Manager cc: George Harvilla, City of Fontana Ralph Roberts, A-E J.N. 01-064 • • • \\ASSOC-WIN2K\supportl\JOB-NO\2001\01-064\Rejection of change order for irrigation line 10 29_02.doc A.D.General Engineering Construction Inc., ♦•♦ 2829 N.Glenoaks Blvd.Ste 106/101 • Burbank,Ca 91504 Phone(818)559-7383♦Fax(818)559-5502 January 15, 2002 Associated Engineers Inc., 3311 E. Shelby Street Ontario, CA 91764-4872 Project: South Highland and Juniper Ave Sewer Improvements Subject: Invoices for Extra Work and Delays Dear Mr. Holliman, We are submitting Invoicing for'Delays and Extra Work"we encounter on the South Highland ans Juinper Ave. Sewer Improvements. Should you have any questions please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, Scott A. Snyder President ASs A.D. General Engineering Construction Inc., January 9, 2003 A.D. General Engineering Construction Inc., 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Ste. 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 City of Fontana 8353 Sierra Ave. Fontana, CA 92335 Project: South Highland Ave. and Juniper Ave. Sewer System Improvements Subject: Delay on Walnut August 7, 2002 ,At 10:00 A.M. A.D. had 575 feet of trench open for recompaction on Walnut at Station 2+25 to 8+50. A.D. was ready to test 200 feet but the tech was not on the job site. Ralph said the tech would be on the site within 20 minutes. At 12:00 P.M. we were ready to test the entire trench but the tech was still not on the job site. We were delay.3 hours because we could not backfill the trench until the tests was taken by the tech. 3 Hour Delay 1- Excavator& Operator $ 165.00 • @ 3 hrs $ 495.00 1- Cat 936 Loader $ 45.09 @ 3 hrs $ 135.27 1-J.D. 410 Backhoe $ 27.34 @ 3 hrs $ 82.02 1-Ford Utility Truck $ 16.49 @ 3 hrs $ 49.47 1-Bamag 124 Compactor $ 19.36 @ 3 hrs $ 58.08 1- 3 alx Dump Truck $ 35.78 @ 3 hrs $ 107.34 1-Water Truck $ 14.76 @ 3 hrs $ 44.28 Sub Total $ 971.46 15%Mark Up $ 145.72 Total Equipment $1,117.18 1-Foreman $ 37.50 @ 3 hrs $ 112.50 1-Pipe Layer $ 31.73 c�3 hrs $ 95.19 4-Laborers $ 30.28 @ 3 hrs $ 363.36 Sub Total $571.05 20%Mark Up $ 114.21 Total.Labor $ 685.26 Total Equipment Charges $ 1,117.18 Total Labor Charges $ 685.26 Sub Total $ 1,802.44 2%Bonding_Charge_ $ 36.05 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $ 1,838.49 January 9, 2002 A.D. General Engineering Construction Inc., 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Ste 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 City of Fontana 8353 Sierra Ave Fontana, CA 92335 Project: South Highland Ave. Juniper Ave. Sewer System Improvements Subject: Irrigation line at Station 9+85 Repair Extra Work to complete Irrigation Line Repair Work Complete 8/29/02 1 Hour to complete repair 8/29/02 7 CY of 2.0SK Slurry $ 332.41 Sub Total $ 332.41 15%Mark Up $ 49.86 Total Equipment $ 382.27 2—Laborers $ 30.28 @ lhr $ 60.56 Sub Total $ 60.56 20%Mark Up $ 12.11 Total Labor $ 72.67 Total Materials Charges $ 382.27 Total Labor Charges $ 72.67 Sub Total $ 454.94 2%Bonding Charges $ 9.10 TOTAL.AMOUNT.DTTF. $..464.04. a1OW4.7.44„JJ U.JVUIC-•'/1.U.LICIVCIAtALCIVULL/lNOI II4L'. 1[VDCI\IOVIN0 .,T1 kaua/DOU-LLuu ragezDTL IOBERTSON'S 10 C • ROCq<•SAND•BASE MATERIALS I ' READY MIX CONCRETE 1 i\) (909)585 Y[00• -04)8347.`r57 l'^�©� r [lNVCDOC-F FED.LD.#t33-0491865 l" � ', CUSTOMER JOB NUMBER/P.O. DELIVERY DATE PLANT DEL.FROM DATE NUMBER 08/29/02 08/29/02 96789 ,,,,,,,a• •r eOB ADDRESS ZONE CUS7 NO. JCN NO. I�PBRr 73850 020829 )1-gA ()3 ba A:D.GENERAL ENG CONST INC REMIT TO:P.O.BOX 1659 2829 N. GLENOAKS BLVD STE 106 CORONA,CA 92878 TERMS: BURBANK CA 91504 , Qj (f ` DUE 10THOF MONTH FOLLOWING . DATE OF INVOICE DELIVERY ARWVE FINISH MN QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION TAX UNIT PRICE AMOUNT •1 TICKET NO. JOB POUR �'' 8601553 10:31 10:40 9 7.00 CY RC188N13 2.03K SLURRY Y 37.50 262.50 8601553 7.00 PY 3100 SHORT LOAD Y 30.00 • • • ENERGY SURCHG 8.00 ENV FEE 8.00 SUBTOTAL 308.50 TOTAL MIN ALLOWED MIN STANDBY MIN SALES TAX 23.91 TOTAL QUANTITY TERMS: INVOICES ARE DUE 10TH OF MONTH FOLLOWING DATE OF INVOICE. PAST DUE INV 7.00 00 ACCOUNTS SUBJECT TO A MONTHLY SERVICE CHARGE OF 1.5%. BUYER TO PAY REASONABLE 332.41( COSTS OF COLLECTION INCLUDING ATTORNEY FEES. d 1 January 9, 2003 A.D. General Engineering Construction Inc., 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Ste. 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 City of Fontana 8353 Sierra Ave. Fontana, CA. 92335 Project: South Highland Ave. and Juniper Ave. Sewer System Improvements Subject: Delay due to unmarked and unknown location of Irrigation line and is "Extra Work" due from"Unsafe Changed Condition". Location: Juniper Ave 'Date of Delay July 29, 2002 Found encasement at Station 9+85. Pot holed encasement to determine size appeared to be an old unstable Storm Drain or Irrigation Line. Ralph Roberts the inspector instructed A.D. to remove encasement because it looked unsafe to tunnel under it. A.D. started Jack Hammering at 11:15 A.M. and finish at 2:30 P.M.the encasement was very large and difficult to break out. George Harvilla came to job site apox. 1:30 p.m. and examine the situation, George Harvilla understood and agreed that this was a delay due to an unmarked service. Ralph Roberts instructed A.D.to come back at a later date and replace the removed section of pipe. Repairs made on 8/28/02& 8/29/02 see invoices attached for the repair. 6 Hour Delay 1- Excavator& Operator $ 165.00 @ 6 hrs $ 990.00 1- Cat 936 Loader $ 45.09 @ 6 hrs $ 270.54 1- 410 Backhoe $ 27.34 @ 6 hrs $ 164.04 1- Ford Utility Truck $ 16.49 @ 6 hrs $ 98.94 1- Bamag 124 Compactor $ 19.36 @ 6 hrs $ 116.16 1- Water Truck $ 14.76 @ 6 hrs $ 88.56 1- Compressor $ 16.65 @ 6 hrs $ 99.90 • 1-3 alx Dump Truck $ 35.78 @ 6 hrs $ 214.68 1-4'X20" Trench Box $ 26.12 @ Daily $ 26.12 1- 8'X20' Trench Box $ 32.00 @ Daily $ 32.00 Sub Total $ 2,100.94 15%Mark Up $ 315.14 Total Equipment $ 2,416.08 1 —Foreman $ 37.50 @ 6 hrs $ 225.00 1-Pipe layer $ 31.73 @ 6 hrs $ 190.38 4-Laborers $ 30.28 @ 6 hrs $ 726.72 Sub Total $1,142.10 20%Mark Up $ 228.42 Total Labor $1,370.52 Total Equipment Charges $ 2,416.08 Total Labor Charges $ 1,370.52 Sub Total $ 3,785.60 2%Bonding Charge $ 75.73 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $ 3,862.33 January 9, 2003 A.D. General Engineering Construction inc., 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Burbank, CA 91504 City of Fontana 8353 Sierra Ave. Fontana, CA 92335 Project: South Highland Ave. and Juniper Ave. Sewer System Improvements Subject: Irrigation Line at Station 9+85 Repair Extra Work to repair Irrigation Line from July 29, 2002 Work Started on August 28, 2002 Total Hours on 8/29/02 5 Hours. 1-J.D. 410 Backhoe $ 27.34 @ 5 hrs $ 136.70 13FT SDR 34 PVC Sewer Pipe $ 9.81 $ 137.41 Total Equipment&Materials $ 274.11 15%Mark Up $ 4112 Total Equipment&Materials $ 315.23 1- Owner Operator $ 165.00 @ 5 hrs $ 825.00 2-Laborers $ 30.28 @ 5 hrs $ 302.80 Sub Total $1,127.80 20%Mark Up,, $ 225.56 Total labor Charges $ 1,353.36 Total Equipment &Materials $ 315.23 Total labor Charges $ 1,353.36 Sub Total $ 1,668.59 2%Bonding Charge $ 33.37 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $ 1,701.96 • e ,_ wot Western Water Works Supply Co. . ,6, 5671 Gates Street INVOICE q; Chino, CA 91710 4.6 �• �.. (909) 597-7000 FAX (909) 597-7050 AA p�Y COM��t• /\ . ... OF0 IRpICFOAT£ OAgEy10 /i 000000 08/28/02 106063 00 :::::<::.::;::;;:: . cusT.#: 26013 A� � n FONTANA 1 SHIP TO: 0C. n "/ \A 0 GENERAL ENGINEERING CONST � JUNIPERST BETWEEN WALNUT & CORRESPONDENCE TO: WESTERN WATER WORKS SUPPLY CO SOUTH UTH IIHIGHLAND FONTANA, CA 5671 GATES ST CHINO, CA 91710 . BILL TO: A D GENERAL ENGINEERING CONST 2829 N GLENOAKS BL STE 106/101 :> INS THUCTI ONS: ::»Ps::::r<:<;<::2:::>: E <::[ BURBANK, CA 91504 • >»> ::»::>::>::»: :<:»:;:;::<;::»:<:: ? ATTN:BRIAN • »'•»'•>z><>»E E>: >l:I .SH p.P£7 h3'k'...............................•.......SHIPVIA:;•;::;•:;;•;:::•:;•:;.;:.>S. .ts0:.;:.>:.:;:.::.;:.;;;:.:<.::;:.: :.;::•;:,;:.;;;:.;: MAIN WHSE >- CHINO '>::: < :<OUR :TRUCK ; 08/28/02 NET 30 DAYS <:;LINE::::5:::.: :iy,::::?::i:::'::':;:£:S:;i: ..::s5::;::ii: . •:::.�:.::: ::::: .:::.r:;:.:::•:;:.;:.;:.::.;::;.:......:•.�:::::::::::.:::.: :::::::.�:.....:.ot:::.:::::::::..�::; ... ..... ................... F. 3i :;:> i :it;::`iiar:ii :i3iii � .k ................ 1+IT :';ii:i`C2�?ii{o`i:i:i ;,.:r:c>;;:•:: .::•>;�.;,:>;�::: ::::::::::::.� ...;>;:.::s::..:.:;:.o:::: �:<�: ;;: . >::;:•:�::o:;;<•:»: :::::: ::::.: ......P.RU.4S? ......................................#IUAN'E'.'�K............IX.VA...kTl!..................QiY..............,....:QTY�.:::: .:�:::::::::.UN.!T::::::..:....::....:......::.. .::A1VtDUN7'...:........:.... ::NOS::::,>::::z:>:e::>:>;:>s:::>::::. ................ .. SORf'Y.1 ................................OSG>;HS....>:;>;:::x:;;::;:>:;::::5.0 ;:.::;;::::.::::.:>::::&MfPREt3...,,.:;:.:.;;::.:•:U :.,...:i::::>:`•>i's:<>::<:». :i>::i:>.....::::: :>::».,...;..... : . ..;<:;':,...:.,::..:».. 1 :::iSOOi�j 5..10..:..:............................•..................... 13 i; .0:?' 13 ::;F"C''.::''::: 9.81 s: :? ? 127:53:;:;:: ;;:;1 •:;; :. 5:;.P :::i: : :•:;.:S.E ::' ....1. .. 5.SpR3.......VG GRAUITY...SEWER......PF• 1 ne ta .:::?:•::. .....o...l..................................................... Qty h... .....14.......... ,:::; Total >:::::127:�53:::>.: Taxes •;;:;•:9:;;�'::::• <:: Invoice Total ''::]37:41':`:. ................................................................................. .. : ....:..................... CashDiscount • 0.00 If.{P.a.i d'.B :> 8Z28f: .02 Last Page January 9, 2003 A.D. General Engineering Construction Inc., 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. St. 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 City of Fontana 8353 Sierra Ave. Fontana, CA 92335 Project: South Highland Ave. and Juniper Ave. Sewer System Improvements Subject: Delay on Walnut July 15, 2002 Pacific Bell line was in way of the project. 3 Hour Delay 1-Excavator& Operator $ 165.00 @ 3 hrs $ 495.00 1- Cat 936 Loader $ 45.09 @ 3 hrs $ 135.27 1-J.D. 410 Backhoe $ 27.34 @ 3 hrs $ 82.02 1-Ford Utility Truck $ 16.49 @ 3 hrs $ 49.47 1- Sweeper $ 19.63 @ 3 hrs $ 58.89 1- 3 Axle Dump Truck $ 35.78 @ 3 hrs $ 107.34 1-Water Truck $ 14.76 @ 3 hrs $ 44.28 Sub Total $ 972.27 15%Mark Up $ 145.72 Total Equipment $ 1118.11 1-Forman $ 37.50 @ 3 hrs $ 112.50 2-Laborers $ 30.28 @ 3 hrs $ 181.68 Sub Total $ 294.18 20%Mark Up $ 58.84 Total Labor $ 353.02 Total Equipment $ 1118.11 Total.T.ahor.. $ 181.68 Sub Total $ 1299.79 2%BondingCharge $ 26.00 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $ 1325.79 Progress Payment No. 3 Client Name: City of Fontana Job Name: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements Job No.: SP-46-02 P.O.NV.O. No.: 03-6P001 Pay Period: September 1, 2002 to September 30, 2002 Prepared by: T.R. Holliman Date Prepared: October 21,2002 Quantity Amount Bid Unit Extended Completed Earned Item Description Quantity Unit Price Total this Period this Period 1 Clearing and Grubbing, and Mobilization 1 LS $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 0% $ - 2 Traffic Control, Signing and Striping 1 LS $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 28.72% $ 2,872.00 3 10" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer(C700) 4,515 LF $ 52.00 $ 234,780.00 770 $ 40,040.00 4 8" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer(C7W) 254 LF $ 55.00 $ 13,970.00 254 $ 13,970.00 5 10" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer(C1208) 142 LF $ 70.00 $ 9,940.00 142 $ 9,940.00 6 8" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe 63 LF $ 65.00 $ 4,095.00 63 $ 4,095.00 4" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer Lateral per 7 City of Fontana Std. Detail No. 125 80 LF $ 50.00 $ 4,000.00 - $ - 8 6" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer Lateral per City of Fontana Std. Detail No. 125 249 LF $ 50.00 $ 12,450.00 249 $ 12,450.00 9 8" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer Lateral per City of Fontana Std. Detail No. 125 35 LF $ 50.00 $ 1,750.00 - $ - 10 Sewer Manhole per City of Fontana Std. Detail No. 112, Modified to 5' Diameter Manhole 4 EA $ 6,500.00 $ 26,000.00 4 $ 26,000.00 11 Sewer Manhole per City of Fontana Std. Detail No. 112, Modified to 4' Diameter Manhole 11 EA $ 3,800.00 $ 41,800.00 3 $ 11,400.00. Connection to Existing Sewer Manhole at Walnut& 12 Cypress including Manhole Base Reconstruction and Related Work 1 EA $ 1,700.00 $ 1,700.00 - $ - 13 Remove existing asphalt 9,773.50 SF $ 0.10 $ 977.35 216 $ 21.60 14 Asphalt Concrete Pavement(Superceded by Bid Item k 19) 1,300 , TON $ 37.00 $ 48,100.00 (586) $ (21,682.00) Construct Microtunneling, complete with 36"steel 15 casing,jacking pits, receiving pit, redwood skids, etc. all per details. - 140 LF $ 240.00 $ 33,600.00 140 $ 33,600.00 `'_' Page 1 of 2 Quantity Amount Bid Unit Extended Completed Earned Item Description Quantity Unit Price Total this Period this Period Construct Microtunneling, complete with 18" steel 16 casing,jacking pits, receiving pit, redwood skids, etc. all per details. 63.0 LF $ 260.00 $ 16,380.00 63.0 $ 16,380.00 17 Potholing existing utilities 25 EA $ 25.00 $ 625.00 5 $ 125.00 18 Install asphalt overlay 1 LS $ 42,150.00 $ 42,150.00 95% $ 40,042.50 19 Install Asphalt Concrete Pavement 745 TONS $ 41.00 $ 30,545.00 745 $ 30,545.00 TOTAL AMOUNT EARNED THIS PERIOD: $ 219,799.10 RETENTION WITHHELD (10%): $ 21,979.91 TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROGRESS PAYMENT THIS PERIOD: $ 197,819.19 PROJECT SUMMARY: THRU C.O.#2 TOTAL AMOUNT OF CONTRACT: $ 494,762.35 TOTAL AMOUNT EARNED FROM PRIOR PERIODS: $ 272,855.75 AMOUNT EARNED THIS PERIOD: $ 219,799.10 TOTAL AMOUNT EARNED TO DATE: $ 492,654.85 PERCENT COMPLETE: 99.6% TOTAL NUMBER OF DAYS TO COMPLETE THE WORK: 66 Working days TOTAL NUMBER OF DAYS FROM PRIOR PERIODS: 46 Working days NUMBER OF DAYS IN THIS PERIOD: 20 Working days TOTAL NUMBER DAYS ELAPSED TO DATE: 66 Working days PERCENT OF TIME ELAPSED: 100.0% C.O.# NOTES: 1 Change Order No.1 added AC Overlay,Bid Item No.18 2 Change Order No.2 changed the quantities in bid items 3,4,5,6,8,10,11,13,15,&17,deleted bid item 14,added bid item 19, and added 24 working days to tie-time to complete the project due to delays caused by underground utility interferences. Prepared by: / ate: /e, 2-/2- (Associated Engineers) Prepared b i%L�, J Dat l�y z l '—' y e• / (Associated Engineers) Approved by: Date: (A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc.) Approved by: Date: (City of Fontana) Page 2 of 2 , Change Order No. 2 Client Name: City of Fontana Job Name: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements Job Number: SP-46-02 P.OJW.O.. No.: 03-6P001 Pay Period: September 1, 2002 to September 30, 2002 Prepared by: T.R. Holliman Date Prepared: October 21,2002 Change Bid Revised Original In Unit Net Contract Working Item Description Quantity Quantity Quantity Unit Price Change Days 1 Clearing and Grubbing, and Mobilization 1 1 - LS $ 10,000.00 $ - 2 Traffic Control, Signing and Striping 1 1 LS $ 1 0,000.00 $ _ 3 10" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer(C700) 4, 515 4,524 (9.00) LF $ 52.00 $ (468.00) 16 4 8" Ex tra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer(C7W) 254 250 4.00 LF $ 55.00 $ 220.00 5 10" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer(C1208) 142 135 7.00 LF $ 70.00 $ 490.00 6 8" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe 63 97 (34.00) LF $ 65.00 $ (2,210.00) 7 4" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer Lateral per City of Fontana Std. Detail No. 125 80 120 (40.00) LF $ 50.00 $ (2,000.00) 8 6" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer Lateral per City of Fontana Std. Detail No. 125 249 234 15.00 LF $ 50.00 $ 750.00 9 8" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer Lateral per City of Fontana Std. Detail No. 125 35 35 - LF $ 50.00 $ - 10 Sewer Manhole per City of Fontana Std. Detail No. 112, Modified to 5' Diameter Manhole 4 3 1.00 EA $ 6,500.00 $ 6,500.00 4 11 Sewer Manhole per City of Fontana Std. Detail No. 112, Modified to 4' Diameter Manhole 11 12 (1.00) EA $ 3,800.00 $ (3,800.00) Connection to Existing Sewer Manhole at Walnut& 12 Cypress inclding Manhole Base Reconstruction and Related Work 1 1 - EA $ 1,700.00 $ - 13 Remove existing asphalt 9,774 43,000 (33,226.50) SF $ 0.10 $ (3,322.65) 14 Asphalt Concrete Pavement - 1,300 (1,300.00) TONS. $ 37.00 $ (48,100.00) Page 1 of 2 • Change Bid Revised Original In Unit Net Contract Working Item Description Quantity Quantity Quantity Unit Price Change Days Construct Microtunneling, complete with 36"steel 15 casing,jacking pits, receiving pit, redwood skids, etc. all per details. 140 135 5.00 LF $ 240.00 $ 1,200.00 Construct Microtunneling, complet with 18"steel 16 casing,jacking pits, receieving pit, redwood skids, etc. all per details. 63.0 56.7 6.30 LF $ 260.00 $ 1,638.00 4 17 Potholing existing utilities 25 20 5.00 EA $ 25.00 $ 125.00 18 Install asphalt overlay (added by C.O.#1) 1 1 - LS $ 42,150.00 $ - 19 Asphalt Concrete Pavement 745 - 745.00 TONS $ 41.00 $ 30,545.00 TOTAL ADJUSTMENT TO CONTRACT AMOUNT $ (18,432.65) +24 days PROJECT SUMMARY: TOTAL AMOUNT OF CONTRACT: (thru C.O.#1): $ 513,195.00 TOTAL ADJUSTMENT TO CONTRACT AMOUNT(C.O.#2): $ (18,432.65) REVISED CONTRACT TOTAL AMOUNT: $ 494,762.35 TOTAL NUMBER OF DAYS TO COMPLETE THE WORK(thru C.O.#1): 451 Working days TOTAL ADJUSTMENT TO TIME TO COMPLETE: 24 Working days REVISED CONTRACT TIME TO COMPLETE: 66 Working days REVISED COMPLETION DATE: 9-Oct-02 NOTES: C.O.# 1 Change Order No. 1 added AC Overlay,Bid Item 18. 2 Change Order No.2 changed the quantities in bid items 3,4,5,6,8,10,11,13,15,&17,deleted bid item 14,added bid item 19, and added 24 working days topp,time to complete the{3rgject due to delays caused by underground utility interferences. Prepared by: .Lz � L Date: (�� (Associated Engineers) Prepared by:I'f � y- ��' Date: �c��7-�-7_-- (Associated Engineers) Approved by: Date: (A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc.) Approved by: Date: (City of Fontana) Page 2 of 2 Progress Payment No. 3 : :. Job No.: SP-46-02 Client Name: City of Fontana rovements Job Name: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Imp P.O. N.O. No.: 03-6P001 tember 30, 2002 Pay Period: September 1, 2002 to Sep Quantity Amount Prepared by: T.R.Holliman Earned 2002 Extended Completed Date Prepared: October 21, Unit this Period this Period Price Total 0% $ Bid Qu�® $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 ° 2,872.00 Description 10,000.00 28.72/° $ Item �® $ 10,000.00 $ �Clearin• and Grubbin•, and Mobilization $ 40,040.00 ©Traffic Control, Si•nin• and Stri•in• $ 52.00 $ 234,780.00 770 $ 0 13,970.00 00 th Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer(C700) 4,515 $ 55.00 $ 13,970.00 410E Extra treng 254 ® 9,940.00970. 9,940.00 142 $ 4 8" Strength Vitrified Cla Pi•e Sewer C7W $ 70.00 $ 63 $ 4,095.00 Pipe Sewer(C1208) 142 ® 65.00 $ 4,095.00 U 10E Extra Strength Vitrified Clay63 LF $ 6 8" Extra Strength Vitrified Detail No.Pi•a Sewer Lateral per 80 11111 $ 50.00 $ 4,000.00 $ ©4" Extra Strength Vitrified Clay p 249 $ 12,450.00 Cit of Fontana Std. 125 $ 50.00 $ 12,450.00 - - Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer Lateral per 249 1111111 8 6" Extra Strength MN $ Cit of Fontana Std.Detail No. 125 $ 50.00 $ 1,750.00 Vitrified Clay Pipe Sewer Lateral per 8" Extra Strength4 $ 26,000.00 9 Cit of Fontana Std.Detail No. 125 $ per Cityof Fontana Std.Detail No. 4 EA $ 11111111.1 $ 11,400.00 Sewer Manhole 10 112, Modified to 5' Diameter Manhole 3 0 6,500.0000 $ 41 0 26,000.0000 per Cityof Fontana Std.Detail No. IIIIII EA $ ®Sewer Manhole IIIII 112,Modified to 4'Diameter eManhole Ma hole at Walnut& $ Connection to Existing EA $ 1,700.00 $ 1,700,00 216 $ 21.60 I Cypress including Manhole Base Reconstruction and $ 0.10 $ 977.35 Related existing 9,773.50 ® (586) $ (21,682.00) ®Remove existin• as•halt (Superceded by Bid Item TON $ 37.00 $ 48,100.00 Asphalt Concrete Pavement 1,300 14 19 33,600.00 complete with 36"steel 33,600.00 140 $ 11111 Construct Microtunneling, pit, redwood skids,etc. $ 240.00 $ Page 1 of 2 casing,jacking pits,receiving 140 all •er details. JOB NO. 01-064 TELEFAX TELEFAX TELEFAX TELEFAX ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS, INC. Consulting Civil Engineering u 3311 East Shelby Street ;: I: ,, Ontario, CA 91764 (909) 980-1982/ FAX(909) 941-0891 TO: Mr. Scott Snyder FIRM: A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. FROM: Tom Holliman U, DATE: October 22, 2002 TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES (including cover sheet) 5 COMMENTS: Please sign and fax to George Harvilla, City of Fontana. If you have any questions please call. FAX NUMBER: (818) 559-5502 ORIGINAL SENT VIA MAIL XXX YES NO • Harvilla, George From: Tom Holliman [tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 9:07 AM To: scott@adgenengr.com Cc: "Ralph Roberts"; Harvilla, George Subject: Ayala Boring Meeting Mr. Snyder, We are receipt of your letter requesting a meeting with Ayala Boring Inc. regarding thier claim for additional compensation. As you know we have responded on several occasions to the basics of thier claim and have thus far been unable to reach an agreement. In order to make a meeting productive we are meeting with City staff first to review the information you have provided for the Ayala Boring claim and the recent series of claims submitted by AD General. Based on the outcome of that meeting we can determine a course of action for meetings with you and your subcontractor. We should have a tentative schedule available for the meeting by tomorrow morning. If we know sooner than that we will contact you by email and phone. Yours truly, Tom Holliman Associated Engineers, Inc. 1 Mar 1403 12: 04p 00000000000000000000. 559-5502 p. 1 A.D.General Engineering Construction Inc, ••• 2820 N.Clcnoeks Blvd.ate 1001101 i Burbank,Ca 91504 Phone(618)899-7383 i Fax(818)559.5502 FA; COVER SHEET: Ma. h 14, 2003 FA7 TO: George Harvilla 909 427-9169 FR( 4; Jodie Snyder RE: tyala Boring 2Pa es Mar 14 03 12: 04p 00000000000000000000. 559-5502 p. 2 Al,General Engineering Construction Inc. 282J N.GltnudKs Blvd.SW 1081101 0 Burbank,Ca 91504 Phone(818)559-7383♦Fax(818) 9.5602 M< ;h 14, 2003 As dated Engineers, Ine. 33 1 Shelby S1reef Qn rio, CA 91764 RE South Highland Sewer Improvements Sewer Repair Ayala Boring"Claim For Extra Work" De Mr. Holliman, On larch 7, 2003 you were notified again that Ayala Boring requested a meeting to be schedule to scuss there claim. Associated Engineers has failed to acknowledge this request again. Yo -prompt attention in this matter is required. Sin ;rely;, L.fac Snyder Vic President liAssociated Engineers, Inc. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 3311 E.SHELBY STREET,ONTARIO,CA 91764-4872 (909)980-1982 FAX(909)941-0891 March 6, 2003 l/rs0.ttl 8 Y. Mr. Scott Snyder \� `;% A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. \\6 _ , r'—/ 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. ------ _ Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements — Sewer Repair Air Test Dear Mr. Snyder: Now that the sewer break has been repaired, the City has required that the repaired portion of sewer pipeline be air tested. The test only needs to be performed between the two manholes on each end of the repaired pipe section. Please schedule the testing as soon as possible and notify Mr. Ralph Roberts, Inspector from A-E, when the test will be performed so he can witness the work. If you have any questions, please call me at (909) 980-1982. Yours truly, ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS INC. Thomas R. Holliman,PE Senior Project Manager cc: „George,Harvilla, PB-Fontana ,. Ralph Roberts, A-E J.N. 01-064 0:\JOB-NO\2001\01-064\Air Test Re uest 3_06 03.doc PL�INNING DESIGNING SURVEYING Harvilla, George From: scott@adgenengr.com Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 5:41 AM To: tomh@assoc-eng.com Cc: Harvilla,-George Subject: S. Highland Sewer- Non approval of Claims Mr. Holliman, I am in receipt of your letter dated March 6th, 2003, in which you inform A.D. our submitted claims have been denied. I. believe you are wrong in your evaluation of these claims and cannot accept your rejection and refusal to pay. I will contact you and Mr. Harvilla again here soon about this matter. Scott A. Snyder A.D. General Engineering Const. Inc. 1 • • (R) 27:West Beaver Creek Rd., Unit#2, Richmond MI,Ontario Canada L4Cr 1 M8 TO (905)886-0335 Fax (905)886.7323 uNk_pipE -Itilaif:infa(a�linkpipe.carn htpp://www.linkpipe.curn • No-Dig Rehabilitation For Underground Pipes March 10, 2003 • • Mr. George Harvilla • City of Fontana • California,USA Dear Mr-Harvilla: • • Farther to our discussion last Friday on the subject of air;testing of GroutingSlecveTM repair I like to elaborate on this subject as promised. • GroutingSleeveTM is our most often used product. It is designed for gravity sewer pipe repair. • Air test was in the past required on accepting a joint injection project, or new pipes,however lately, this test has been abandoned by most cities. l✓ve y city may have their own reason why they abandoned the test,but it stands to reason that air pressure test does not resemble the conditions in a gravity-flow pipe. A GroutingSleeveTM is designed to restore a damaged or;cracked pipe to its original structural strength. Link-Pipe has other products. one of them for scaling air and gas leaks is the GasSealerTM. This sleeve is designed for sealing leaking joints in a low•pressure(up to 15-psi) gas main and in sewer to the pressure capacity of the host pipe. It has been tested to 110-psi with the test lasting 3 weeks without any loss. This is the sleeve 'we recommend i f air test in a sewer is specified. • For internal fluid pressure we recommend the SewerSealer VDTM, or the PressureSealTM. According to the data we have received from the contractor, the pipe is used for conveying standard domestic sewage. This pipe is not designed for internal air, or fluid pressure application. The fluid in it flows by gravity leaving air above the water. This makes it behave like a channel. The CxroutingSlecveTM used to re air this pipe is what we would normally recommend. In this case the water is contained in the stainless steel channel. The sleeves you have, has a 10-year Limited Warranty. Warrranty conditions are found in the shipping carton. in addition: The metal alloy, SST-316, is selected to retain the 5-psi structural strength for at least 100 years. 1 D 9Oo, p:5200311tallation problems\030310_Forltanu.doc 2 1413 LINK-PIPE, GasSealerT''', GROUTING SLEEVE'" aro trademarks of link-File I te, GROUTING SLncVCT'" Is protected by U.S, Petefit No. W 6,a51,726,European Patent No. OC�30468,Australian Patent No.672784, Canadian and PCT Patents Pending. GasSealerT"'"is protected by US c�,i,..�_ .Yo Patent No.6,136,718.Pressure Sleeve is protected by Canadian and International Patents Pending; '"71pe'w / 4 abed 4E:84 80-04-0M °EZEL989906 !ONI ddId )INI1 :A9 ;ue • • We are prepared to honor the 10-year Limited War><anty on the sleeve as long as the sewer is used for domestic sewtage,or rainwater, The GroutingSleeveTM is a bighquality product but, unfortunately in this case, it is not designed for the internal gas(air)pressure test. We respectfully suggest that this test can not prove the adequacy of the repair. The l 0-year Limited W 5lrranty offers that needed proof, We hereby ask you to grant approval for this repair on above-stated grounds. Sincerely yours, /Lernbit Maimets,P.Eng. President,Link-Pipe Inc. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2for F:\20031Ingtallation problems\030310_Fontana.doc ,,�,;r«..,.v LINK-P1PE6, GasSealer'M, GROUTING SLEEVErm are trademarks of Link-Pipe Inc. GROUTING SLirkVET" protected by U.S. Patent No. 5,351,720, European Patent No.0630456,Australian Patent No.C72784. Canadian and PCT Patents Pending. GesSealerr"is protected by US e Patent No.6.138,71 B.Pressure Sleeve is protected by Canadian end International Patents Pending.: P Z/Z a6ed •r G£:8I. CO-01.--MA 1£c£L9889O6 EONI 2dId )INII :A9 lug F f; Harvilla, George From: scott@adgenengr.com Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 12:07 PM To: Harvilla, George • Subject: •Re: FW:Air Test of Repair George, OK. Scott A. Snyder On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 12:05:56 -0800 (PST) , "Harvilla, George" wrote: FW: Air Test of Repair Scott/Tom, Carlos told me today that he has read the warranty letter from Link-Pipe regarding the grouting sleeve. Carlos said that the warranty letter is sufficient and no further tests are necessary. George Original Message From: Harvilla, George Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 2:58 PM To: 'Carlos Navarro' Cc: Scott Snyder (scott@adgenengr.com) ; 'Tom Holliman' ; 'Ralph Roberts' ; Ralph Roberts at Home (coralph@earthlink.net) ; Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org) Subject: Air Test of Repair Carlos, This afternoon, A. D. General sent a crew out to perform an air pressure test on the pipe repair. The repair method used the Link-Pipe grouting sleeve. The repaired area did not hold the 3 psi pressure after several attempts. We spoke to the manufacturer in Canada, and he said that 95% of the cities they supply the sleeves to do not require air testing. Since he did not know in advance that we would air test this sleeve, he sent a sleeve that is not designed for air testing. He said had he known, they could have sent a different type of sleeve designed for air tests. I told the representative the city needed some type of certification that the grouting sleeve is permanent and of high quality. He will fax me information on Monday which I will forward to you. He said the epoxy lining is rated for 75 years of service and the stainless steel shell for 100 years. If you know of any other way to test this sleeve, please let us know. Otherwise, I think we'll have to rely on the manufacturer's information. 1 HarviIIa, George... From: Harvilla, George Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 9:57 AM To: Scott Snyder(scott@adgenengr.com);Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com) Cc: 'Carlos Navarro'; 'Carla Pursel'; Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com); Ralph Roberts at Home (coralph@earthlink.net) Subject: FW: Air Test of Repair Scott!Tom, Carlos told me today that he has read the warranty letter from Link-Pipe regarding the grouting sleeve. Carlos said that the warranty letter is sufficient and no further tests are necessary. George Original Message From: Harvilla, George Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 2:58 PM To: 'Carlos Navarro' Cc: Scott Snyder(scottOadgenengr.com); 'Tom Holliman'; 'Ralph Roberts'; Ralph Roberts at Home (coralphOearthlink.net); Carla Pursel (cpursel(a fontana.orq) Subject: Air Test of Repair Carlos, This afternoon, A. D. General sent a crew out to perform an air pressure test on the pipe repair. The repair method used the Link-Pipe grouting sleeve. The repaired area did not hold the 3 psi pressure after several attempts. We spoke to the manufacturer in Canada, and he said that 95%of the cities they supply the sleeves to do not require air testing. Since he did not know in advance that we would air test this sleeve, he sent a sleeve that is not designed for air testing. He said had he known,they could have sent a different type of sleeve designed for air tests. I told the representative the city needed some type of certification that the grouting sleeve is permanent and of high quality. He will fax me information on Monday which I will forward to you. He said the epoxy lining is rated for 75 years of service and the stainless steel shell for 100 years. If you know of any other way to test this sleeve, please let us know. Otherwise, I think we'll have to rely on the manufacturer's information. George Harvilla • • FAX =-too YEARS PARSONS 16689 Foothill Boulevard BRINCKERHOFF Suite 103 Fontana,CA 92335 /t1 909-427-9166 ° Fax:909-427-9169 C. !" harvilla@pbworld.com (b`l ( i\ To: From: George Harvilla Date: J—//_ © 7 Project No.: • Fax No.: eyi _ 4)/C!/ No. of Pages (including this page): • Subject: Comments: r rr Over a Century of Engineering Excellence RESPONSE REQUESTED South Highland Sewer Repair Page 1 of 3 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:58 AM To: Carlos Navarro (cnavarro@fontana.org) Subject: FW: South Highland Sewer Repair FYI Original Message From: Harvilla, George Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:57 AM To: 'Tom Holliman' Cc: 'Ralph Roberts'; Ralph Roberts at Home (coralph@earthlink.net) Subject: RE: South Highland Sewer Repair Tom, I agree with the air test. Please let Scott know. George Original Message From: Tom Holliman [mailto:tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 9:45 AM To: Harvilla, George Cc: "Ralph Roberts" Subject: RE: South Highland Sewer Repair George, Let's air test. If we have pictures and are confident the sleeve was inserted properly then an air test will close the loop and we can final the job. Did you get a chance to review the two letters I sent? I am also drafting a letter regarding the stop notices so Scott is aware that when we final the job and go to the Council for acceptance that he has 30 days to get the releases or we pay his creditors directly from his retention. Also we need a final change order to deduct his share of the overtime charges from his retention As a final matter I would like to submit a request for an amendment to our contract to cover our extended services and the overtime inspection charges. Thanks, Tom Holliman Associated Engineers Original Message [Tom Holliman] From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 9:03 AM To: Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com) Subject: FW: South Highland Sewer Repair 3/7/2003 South Highland Sewer Repair Page 2 of 3 Tom, Ralph says he agrees with an air test (see below). Please consult with him again and then get back to me with your recommendation air test or video? If you haven't seen Ralph's digital pix, let me know and I will forward to you. Thanks, George Original Message From: Ralph Roberts I agree, an air test would be appropriate. Here is the first of todays pics. Original Message From: Tom Holliman [mailto:tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 2:15 PM To: Harvilla, George Cc: "Ralph Roberts" Subject: RE: South Highland Sewer Repair HI George, I guess I would support a new video before another air test. We want to see how the sleeve fits within the pipe from both ends, something you can't effectively do from the manhole. The air test would tell us that we sealed the pipe within spec but not if the sleeve is crooked, etc. According to Ralph the break is so close to the manhole that the inflatible bladder used in the testing to plug the sewer would actuall cover the repair sleeve so you couldn't tell if it were leaking there or not. Tom Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 1:25 PM To: 'Ralph Roberts'; Ralph Roberts at Home (coralph@earthlink.net); 'Tom Holliman' Subject: FW: South Highland Sewer Repair Importance: High Ralph/Tom, Carlos is recommending an air test, but not a video your opinions please. George Original Message From: Carlos Navarro [mailto:cnavarro@fontana.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 12:21 PM To: Harvilla, George Cc: Ricardo Sandoval; Ray Bragg Subject: FW: South Highland Sewer Repair 3/7/2003 South Highland Sewer Repair Page 3 of 3 Importance: High George, I think we need an air test on the section.Why don't you talk it over with Ralph, I personally don't think we need another video. Carlos. Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 12:08 PM To: 'Carlos Navarro' Cc: Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org); Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org); 'Tom Holliman'; 'Ralph Roberts'; Ralph Roberts at Home (coralph@earthlink.net); Scott Snyder(scott@adgenengr.com) Subject: South Highland Sewer Repair Carlos, A.D. General Engineering Company repaired the cracked sewer pipe under Juniper Avenue today using a grouting sleeve. Ralph Roberts observed the installation and it appeared to go well. Do you want to perform another video inspection in about a week to ensure the repair is performing well? George Harvilla 3/7/2003 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:25 PM To: Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com) Cc: Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com) Subject: FW: FW: Pipe Repair FYI Original Message From: SCOTT SNYDER [mailto:adgenengr@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:10 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: Re: FW: Pipe Repair As soon as I get everything set up. Working on it, wont be long. >From: "Harvilla, George" <Harvilla@pbworld.com> >To: "Scott Snyder (scott@adgenengr.com) " <scott@adgenengr.com>, "Scott >Snyder (adgenengr@hotmail.com) " <adgenengr@hotmail.com> >CC: "Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com) " <tomh@assoc-eng.com> >Subject: FW: Pipe Repair >Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:40:04 -0500 >Scott, >When do you think you can begin the pip repair? >George > Original Message >From: Harvilla, George >Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 4:42 PM >To: Scott Snyder (adgenengr@directvinternet.com) >Cc <mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com)Cc> : 'Tom Holliman' ; Ralph >Roberts >(ralphr@assoc-eng.com <mailto:ralphr@assoc-eng.com> ) ; Ralph Roberts at >Home >(coralph@earthlink.net <mailto:coralph@earthlink.net> ) ; Carlos Navarro >(cnavarro@fontana.org <mailto:cnavarro@fontana.org> ) ; Ray Bragg >(rbragg@fontana.org <mailto:rbragg@fontana.org> ) ; Paul Balbach >(pbalbach@fontana.org <mailto:pbalbach@fontana.org> ) ; Carla Pursel >(cpursel@fontana.org) >Subject <mailto:cpursel@fontana.org)Subject> : Pipe Repair >Importance: High >Scott, >The City has approved your proposed method for repairing the South Highland >Sewer, using the Link Pipe Grouting Sleeve technique. The City requests >that the warranty be in the City's name and not A.D. General's, in case >A.D. >General ceases operations in the Fontana area in the future. 1 >Please proceed with the repairs at your earliest possible convenience. ' >Before starting, contact Associated Engineers so Ralph Roberts can >observe the procedure. I would also like to be present during the >repair. >After the repairs, we will begin to close out the contract. > >Sincerely, >George Harvilla MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus 2 Harvilla, George From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:50 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: Link Pipe Repair Contact The sales rep I am working with is Alar Karuks, phone number 1-905-886-0335 ext.304, E- mail: akaruks@linkpipe.com foie r.o r 6--e / i Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 1:10 PM To: Scott Snyder(E-mail); Carlos Navarro (E-mail);Tom Holliman (E-mail) Subject: FW: LINK-PIPE Information Request Scott/Carlos/Tom, I got a response regarding my question (below) about the sewage flow getting over the '"bump " at the end of the pipe repair. George Original Message From: lembit [mailto:lmaimets@linkpipe.com] Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 3:59 PM To: 'master' Subject: RE: LINK-PIPE Information Request Dear Mr. Harvilla, Thanks for your interest. Yes our GROUTING SLEEVE(tm) is suitable for this repair. Originally it was designed for the repair of "Griffen Pipe", a brittle lowfired clay pipe used in Florida from 1900 to 1939. Later we widened its use to all other pipes from concrete to asbestos cement to even cast iron. Your question about creating an obstruction is taken care of by several advantages this sleeve has: 1. As long as there is air above the entire length of the repaired pipe, the quantity of water entering the pipe equals the quantity leaving it. In this case the obstruction is not an issue. Most pipes are designed maximum 2/3 full and therefore this problem does not arise in most cases. Therefore the distrubance is only local. 2. If, however, the pipe happens to be overloaded already, the above is not a valid assessment. In this case the advantage of this sleeves is backed by two properties it has: The friction coefficient od stanless steel is a fraction of clay, or concrete. The other factor is its similiarity to a ventury. As in case of the Ventury, the pressure increase upstream forces the water through at higher velocity. Combined with improved friction coefficient of stainless steel, this again has mostly a low level local disturbance. 3. There is also an advantage as far as the change in the direction of flow lines around the end of the sleeve is concerned. Due to the directional change of flow lines at the ends of the sleeve, there is a gouging effect which keeps the area of the sleeve always clean. We have also placed a 10-year Limited Manufacturer Warranty on the sleeves if used in sanitary or storm sewers. This Warranty does not cover sewers containing industrial effluents and installation-related defects. The last because we do not have control over the installation. However if our installation instructions are followed, these sleeves are designed for a minimum 100-year service life. I will arrange the head-loss calculations so they can be e-mailed for your reference. The Sales Department has also mailed to you a general info.cmation package including a CD. Should you need assistance in starting to install, we have a very experienced instructor available. Please call me at 1-800-265-5696, or my cellular 1-416-827-2144 if I can be of further service. Regards, Lembit (Lem) Maimts, P.E. Link-Pipe Inc. Original Message From: master [mailto:master8linkpipe.com] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 9:05 AM To: Lembit Maimets; Alar Karuks Subject: Fw: LINK-PIPE Information Request 1 Original Message To: <info@linkpipe.com> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 5:05 PM Subject: LINK-PIPE Information Request > Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by > () on Friday, December 13, 2002 at 17 :05:37 > contact_name: George Harvilla > company_name: City of Fontana, CA > phone: 909-427-9166 > fax: > email: harvilla@pbworld.com > street: > provinve_state: CA > city: Fontana > postal_code: > country: USA > grouting_sleeve: yes > comments: We are considering the grouting sleeve for a crack in a 10" vitrified clay sewer pipe. THe pipe is on a 2.0% slope. My queston is: won't sewerage dam/build up when it hits the end of the sleeve? How much of a "bump" is there that the flow > has to go over? 2 j , , i PI 7 1 a � ; Jc T l; ;t i k. {. 1 •. '' i �` {d{ r-4 Manufacturer of No-Dig ipe Repair Products I ,i[echanical p e of hi ai Y._ ,i-. with 1 GROUTING SLE . VETM 1 i 1• NO EXCAVATION • NO TRAFFIC HOLDUPS • NO TILITIES DAMAGED • Grout expands and , ;i4 f - penetrates into backfill yTal. r ,„. `, ett �,, W y u!r ( d y fr a '',,>1.; ,_ �; , , Repaired host pipe A s ,n o�ORicbISTOR�O o� g0 9pp GROUTING SLEEVETM ON ' LINK-PIPE Information Request Page 1 of 1 LINK-PIPE Information Request Below is what you submitted to info@linkpipe.com on Friday, December 13, 2002 at . 17:05:37 contact_name: George Harvilla company_name: City of Fontana, CA phone: 909-427-9166 fax: e_mail: harvilla@pbworld.com street: provinve_state: CA city: Fontana postal_code: I country: USA grouting_sleeve: yes comments: We are considering the grouting sleeve for a crack in a 10" vitrified clay sewer pipe. THe pipe is on a 2.0% slope. My queston is: won't sewerage dam/build up when it hits the end of the sleeve? How much of a "bump" is there that the flow has to go over? FormMail V1.92 © 1995 - 2002 Matt Wright A Free Product of Matt's Script Archive, Inc. http://linkpipe.com/cgi-bin/formmail.cgi 12/13/2002 A.D.General Engineering Construction Inc., +44 2829 N.Glenoaks Blvd.Ste 106/101 •Burbank,Ca 91504 Phone(818)559-7383♦Fax(818)559-5502 t I-, I ,L�o /)p c December 10,2002 � City of Fontana Attn: George Harvilla 8353 Sierra Ave. Fontana,CA 92335 Submittal: For point repair method on 10"V.E.P..severe.main. Will use 10"X36"grouting sleeve. C.C. Carlos Navaro - FAX roo PARSONS 16689 Foothill Boulevard BR/NCKERHOFF Suite 103 Fontana, CA 92335 909-427-9166 Fax:909-427-9169 harvilla@pbworld.com To: / - From: George Harvilla Date: / 2— ! 7r U Z - - Project No.: Fax No.: 9 y/- bf No. of Pages (including this page): Subject: Comments: fc O tit m 0e-d , i7y c�.., f'r . r/ rv6 �/ /x < <. ,'.. i'A Over a Century of. Engineering Excellence RESPONSE REQUESTED { ImportanttTips 4 • Check and test all equipment and fittings before going to the field. l ^, .. • Store equipment and materials in a cool and shaded place.. `s_ ^,,e, • • Keep the label at the twelve o'clock.position when inserting _ ; ,,- "`' , the GROUTING SLEEVETM into the host pipe. • Make sure that no cables or hoses get stuck between the ` Sleeve and the host pipe. ',Girouts _ eck''r Sleeve/Plug Assembly positioned ..,., t. over the joint to be repaired GROUTING SLEEVETM comes with G-200 grout. (Different added compounds are supplied to order for Cost Effectiveness of No-Dig specific applications) Mechanical Spot Repair( . SR) 4 4,,,,&. :. ,.,vim G,,routf,Quant P4 Accordingto published information,the cost of an excavatio in the paved street is at least$3,500. Every GROUTING SLEEVE"is supplied with the required amount MiSR nor ally costs one quarter to a third of this of Grout that must be used to assure quality installation amount. �� Y �� p ,� � £� ��� �� � Any auxili*rywork Pavement repairs,bypass pumping, allat On,Pressor{E',(Approximate Llmi 1. ugeisettmg large equipment interfering with traffic flow,can be „ avoided. installation pressure is normally 7 to 10 psi above the pressure 1'iriSR work takes approximately 20 minutes. Peak measured when the Air Plug without the Sleeve is inflated tQ touch trafficand,effluent flow periods can be avoided,winter the wall of the host pipe.This pressure may vary due to pipe and storm associated inconveniences minimized. tolerances and grout if it is allowed to start curing before the The cost f itiriSR by GROUTING SLEEVETM is often installation pressure is applied. less than'0%a of the total relining. (Ask for d,,tailed budget estimate) ,Caution R A Sleeve must be installed within 20 minutes from the first contact The Ose of GROUTING SLEEVET14f of grout with water. •Restore the original strength of the embedded pipe; • Restores the original design life of sanitary and storm € •emircai Reslstance� i sewer p6e; •Closes oles in pip ; In chemically aggressive environments,the Sleeves may have to •Recreates a new pipe in place of a totally collapsed be made of higher grade stainless steel.The Grout may also have or missing pipe; to be modified.(Contact Link-Pipe Inc. at 1-800-265-5696) • Reinstate s partially collapsed pipes; • Securesmisaligned and offset joints; C,,-k,.,. ,*� x- •Structurally repairs and seals a pipe before t,, ,: , , CIPP relining; Using generally accepted engineering methods,the calculated - • Retards�-oot growth; service life of Stainless Steel GROUTING SLEEVETM retaining its' •Seals a andoned services; full required structural strength is at least 100 years and is actually •Seals e rfiltratign of gravity flow pipes; considered to last in'excess of 225 years.This extrapolation is •Repairs ewer pipe without closing service laterals; based on actual technical background information. •Repairs' ewer without stopping flow. ,mot �, m7ro ff ',• NOTE: Appvals;# Dig-ups de, troy pavements and services,reducing the average de'aign life from expected 30 years to approximately GROUTING SLEEVETM has been tested byWRc and coven to 9 p 12 years.No-Dig repairs,with GROUTING SLEEVETM's leave "Reinstate a broken sewer pipe to its original strength". the infrastr cture unaffected. 1 KimpipE® ,. INC Manufa►, rer of No-Dig Pipe Repair Products . !800) . E;;j atl;;fn o@� kf?pe co A _.�..:x' , _p:�`7��a� :intiA peco" ,, , ., ,w Cii) 27 West Beaver Cre Rd., Unit tt 2, Richmond Hill,Ontario Canada L4B I M8 Tel (905)886-0335 Fax:(905)886-7323 E-Mail:info@linkpipe. pm hipp://vvww.linkpipe.com No-Dig Rehabilitation For Underground Pipei . n General Description of the Link- ipe Grouting-SieeveTm Repair Met od History Link-Pipe Inc. was founded in 1980 with the idea to develop de endable repair methods for underground pipelines with minimal disruption to the area of re.pair. Unlike other repair methods That require barricades and troublesome e cavation, the products 4, produced by Link-Pipe Inc. require minimal disruption to busy streets filled with rush- hour traffic and additional hectic areas of the city. j Lembit Maimets registered the first US Link-Pipe Spot Repair sleeve patent in 1978. These sleeves came commercially to the market in 1980. This )akes Link-Pipe inc. the oldest commercially available Spot Repair technology in the wo d. , _ The original Stainless Steel"' sleeve came to the market in , 89, and the improved Grouting Sleeve"' using Stainless Steel has been on the marke since 1993. : . 0 Performance Standards The Link-Pipe Grouting Sleeve sewer repair technology is 4 trenchless mechanical spot repair that does not involve a large front-end investment. It can be purchased just like a simple piece of hardware and is ideal for emergency rwairs due to the short • amount of time needed from the time the need for repair is spotted to the completed installation. q Unlike many other sewer relining methodsi application of the G ,1 uting Sleeve"' results in permanent itructuraL repairof the underground pipe. Fonnin " a composite structure with the host pipe, the Grouting Sleeve"' creates a new flexible tructure that maintains c its shape and proper alignment when exposed to long-term 1 ads. This composite ( action of the host pipe and Grouting Sleeve is often strong than the original and remains flexible enough to withstand future small earthquake moyements. The Link-Pipe Grouting Sleeve TM can: i - , . • Restore partially collapsed pipes. • Restore sewers to full design life. • Replace collapsed pipes. t IA • Re-align offset joints if not restrained by root penetration irl other rigid materials. 1 i Nso 900( M:General Description of Grou i g Sleeve-Rev.03.doc lin Tdroack Haul I Link-Pipe'. Gas Se,alerT", Grouting Sleeve' are trademarks of Link-Pipe inc. Grouting Sleeve is protVed by U.S. Patent No. 5,351,720,European Patent No.0630458,Australian Patent No,672784,Canadian and PCT Patents Pending1 ll Gas Sealer is protected by US Patent No 6,138,718.Pressure Sleeve is protected by Canadian and International Patents Pending , "enno0 1 • (o 27 West Heaver"Creek d., Unit.#2, Richmond Hill,Ontario IN -P 1 Canada L4BB 1MBp Tel: -05)'886-0335 PP Fax (905)p8p6-7323 0 E-MaiLinfo link i e: Tn tit //www1ink i e:com No-Dig Rehabilitation For Underground Pipes l 14ii! Repair sewer pipes without closing service laterals. / . Repair pipe in preparation for restoring lost backfill. Repair sewers without stopping flow. ' a -Seal infiltrating cracked pipes and pipe joints. o Retard rood growth. I • Seal abandoned services. Close holes created by material loss inpipe walls. )• "Seal ex filtration. Materials and Quality Control (Engineering and Manufacturir ) All Link-Pipe Grouting SleevesTm have a Stainless Steel (SSI 316) structural core. The annular space around the sleeve is filled with an absorbent olyurethane gasket, which is filled with polyurethane grout that will cure in contact wc,h water or air. Curing is characterized by foaming action, which expands and fills the 4 inular space.between the structural Stainless Steel core and the host pipe. ' Expandin grout penetrates into pipe cracks and adjacent sandy soil. The pieces of damaged pip are embedded in the urethane matrix and in turn are adhered to the Stainless Steel re, which form a new composite pipe structure. The new composite pipe, made ups of the stainless steel reinforcement and the old masonry arch of the damaged pip eventually becomes stronger than a new pipe. The newly repaired pipe, however,is .'ress relieved and can absorb soil movements without breaking. f Grouting Sleevesun are available in diameters ranging from 4" (v1 00 mm) to 48" (1200 w i t mm) ;with standard lengths of 18 (450 mm), 24" (600 mm and 36" (900 mm). Continuous relining can be easily made by multi-installation t r overlapping of the UC�c; sleeves. I V y3611 Manufacturing of Grouting SleevesTm follows precise engineering specifications and product quality control throughout the manufacturing process.t f° ly two quality control measures remain to be-inspected=.in the installations process: the amount of-.;grout and docking of the sleeve in place. The latter are easily verified b vis vial ins•ection. Quality control on primary materials, Stainless Steel and the ure anes, takes place in the steel mills and the chemical refinery. Pertinent A.S.T.M. analC.S.A.. standards are. followed and Mill-test Reports are produced for each manufact red batch of material. At Link-Pipe, factory specific quality control standards are ,followed during the manufacturing process. This ensures that the dimensions of the 'beeves are specified. 2 1 `so Goo, M:1General Description of Grouti ' Sleeve=Rev.03.doc IBB Link-Piper"^, Gas Sealerlm Grouting Sleeve ' are trademarks of Link-Pipe Inc. Grouting Sleeve is :prate d by 'U S. Patent No. 5,351,720,European Patent No.0630458,Australian Patent No.672784,Canadian and PCT Patents Pending. as Sealer is protected t.—— 4'. by US Patent No.6,138,718.Pressure Sleeve is protected by Canadian and International Patents Pending. 47VICP i . . . . ® 2c7anWadeastLB4Bealvmer8GTreeei. , d., Unit#2, Richmond Hill,Ontario LI 05)886-0335 Fax (905)886-7323 amp E . E-Mail:info@linkpipe. _ htpp.//www.tinkpipe.com No-Dig Rehabilitation For Underground Pipes A-factor of safety of at least 2.5 is applied in calculating the s fe superimposed load. This ensures that every sleeve has a structural design life of ove 100 years. Standard Equipment All Grouting Sleevew installation equipment is available on the 4pen market except the Flow-through Plug, used for expanding the sleeves. With small 4xceptions, a contractor usually has the equipments before acquiring the sleeves. Foll , ing is a list of all the equipment required: 1 • 2 HP air compressor • Flow-through Link-Pipe Plug .1 • Limit gauge and 1/4 inch air hose preferably with quick couplers • CCTV Camera for remote installation away from the manh$le • Cable and reels, and other incidental construction equipm,nt • Grouting SleeveTM, Grout, and Grout Applicator come in t 'ie package with the sleeve. i For small applications, a push-rod type drain camera is enough for emergency repairs up to 15 inches in diameter and up to 36 inches with an added ght source have been ( made with this camera. For larger projects involving many sleels, a main-line camera is more efficient. A special drain camera bracket is available and fits every Link-Pi le Sewer Plug. The installations Plug comes with a flow-through to reduce the iecessity of water by- pass. The Plug has also a special light for accurate control in I cating the repair and wheels to keep the sleeve from being damaged during transport i I the sewer. Installation Procedure An installation, as described in detail in the brochure, may take s little as 10 minutes, but is strongly recommended that it should not last over 20 min Ites. This is because after 20 minutes the grout starts curing. The speed of installation makes the Grouting SleeveTM' very: cost effective. The installation process is completely mechanical and needs no furl attention once.the sleeve is locked in place. Grout curing occurs outside stainle's steel core and the installation crew can proceed with work elsewhere. ., j 3 oa goof IVIAGeneral Description of Grouti,g Sleeve-Rev.03.doc ' 1110 II TdVaz=4=e Li nk-Piperm, Gas Sealeirm, Grouting Sleeve° are trademarks of Link-Pipe Inc. Grouting Sleeve is prate ed by U.S.0 S Patent No 5,351,720,European Patent No.0830458,Australian Patent No.672784,Canadian and PC7 Patents PendingIGas Sealer is protected by US Patent No.6,138,718.Pressure Sleeve is protected by Canadian and International Patents Pending, :1 i "IMMO . 0 27'West Beaver Creek yi., unit#2, Richmond Hill,Ontario UNKimplipEC) Canada t.4B 1Me8 Tel:( 05)886-0335 Fax:(905)886-7323 E-MaII:intoginkpipe. 1 htppJ/www:iinkpipe.com No-Dig Rehabilitation For Underground Pipes , ,133 The repair retains its structural strength forthe entire service life 7 f the sleeve extending' for over 100 years with the thinnest sleeve's metal core (0,. mm) and becomes proportionally longer with increase thickness of the stainless ste- Id The advantage of low front-end equipment cost allows the city m intenance department to stock standard diameter sleeves and use then as the nee arises. Stocking the sleeves allows rapid response to future emergencies. i i Advantages of the Link-Pipe Grouting Sleeve TM Repair Meth d , A preferred method is to have a small inventory of the most ften-occurring sleeve sizes. Like hardware and other often used supplies, the Gro 'ling Sleeve'-"" can be stored in any ordinary warehouse and used when necessa This enables fast. emergency repairs and routine maintenance calls. The repair pr$cess itself becomes a convenient service call type of response. For larger repair projects, the factory produced Grouting Sleeve makes it possible to combine the inspection and repair contracts into one. Compare to the double tender system of first allowing an inspection contract and several years ester a repair contract; the combined inspection and repair can cut overall costs by appr innately 50%. i Because of the long service life of the sleeves, once the repair i /made, it never has to be repeated again. This also means that no further expendit ::-es on account of the sewer at this repair site need to be anticipated: Link-Pipe offers long-term warranty to relieve the owners of any future worries on this account. 1 Sealing with the Grouting- S!eeveTM , Polyurethane used with the Grouting Sleeve ' does not adhere t s oily surfaces,just like epoxies or other sealing materials. The :Grouting'SleeveTM is designed to stop the infiltration by creating a mechanical seal'in the water passage wit}"�the polyurethane. ' [ As the expanding grout penetrates a crack, it will fill the crack an Its surface roughness • creating a mechanical bond. If the bond is broken, water will try t push the grout out of the crack. As the grout surface that comes in contact w ,h water pressure is compressed, it will simultaneously expand laterally forcing the g ut tighter against the crack walls. ; 1 ' • 4 ,So soar M'.1General Description of Grouti Sleeve-Rev_03.doc aaa Ste, UnI.PipeTM. Gas SealerTM, Grouting SleeveTM are trademarks of Link-Pipe Inc. Grouting Sleeve is ;prate lid by U.S. Patent No. �—_t 5.351,720,European Patent No.0630458,Australian Patent Na.672784,Canadian and PCT Patents Pending. Gas Sealer is protected a ,a by US Patent No.6,138,718.Pressure Sleeve isprotectedby Canadiarcand rntemadional Patents'Pending. m7r4.010 1, . • . in ® 27 West Beaver Cre Rd., Unit#2, Richmond Hill,Ontario Mtk, Canada L4B 1M8 To (905)886-0335 Fax:(905)886-7323 0 E-Mail:infoginicpipe.,orn htpp://www.linkpipe.com No-Dig Rehabilitation For Underground Pipes The new Sealing SleevesTM are designed to overcome the n , d for multiple Grouting SleevesTM and are designed to push the liquid grout into the cracks before it cures. • When the grout thus comes in contact with moisture on thet crack walls, the curing process starts and the grout comes under increasing pe,ssure as it expands. Therefore, first sealing with injection or a special Sealing S pevem" achieves water tightness. Before the Sealing SleeveTM was offered, sealing was ofte 1 achieved by installin.g multiple sleeves until full stop of water flow was achieved. " he Grouting SleeveTm, along with the Sealing Sleeve act both as an infiltration stop ind structural repair in a manner that is unique in the sewer repair industry. The mated Is used for repairs have been proven over 70 years of use in construction in conduits, tlinnels and areas where especially difficult operating conditions have been encountered which makes the Link- Pipe short repair process exceptional. 1 '., Using Stainless Steel as the Primary Material Stainless Steel provides a dependable structural material reg rdless of how long the load is applied. ' Even after a projected service, life exceeding ILO years, no permanent deformations will occur under working loads. The advantages of the Grouting SleeveTM and reasons why the Link-Pipe Grouting SleeveTM is widely used: , Factory Made - consistent high quality, high precision manufaIuring ensures uniform quality for installations in the field; Anyone can use this technology without making a major invest ent; The repairs are permanent; Traffic disruptions are minima!; The,repairs can be done quickly; ( Toxic or environmentally hazardous chemicals are not used; Special materials and coatings are available for all chemical enj ronments; . Clear installation instructions are available for consistently high 4uaiity installations; and The strength of the installed sleeve is not dependent upon the lquality of workmanship as is the case with all other liners. ( Resin and epoxy based liners and structural grouts chang their properties with , changes in temperature in sanitary sewers: Conversely, the routing SleeveTM does not. 5 , ‘ettor MAGeneral Description of GroVing Sleeve-Rev.03,doc IUM., Link-Pipelm, Gas Sealer."'" Grouting Sleeve1M are trademarks of Link-Pipe Inc Grouting Sleeve is proicted by U.S. Patent No. ItUllarikirm. 5,351,720,European Patent No.0630453,Australian Patent No.672784,Canadian and PCT Patents Pendi4i. Gas Sealer is protected e by US Patent No.6,138,718.Pressure Sleeve is protected by Canadian and International Patents Pending_ `4Vincid‘' 1 , i 27 West Beaver Cre Rd., Unit#2, Richmond Hill,Ontario j I(ri' I NK .� Canada'L481MB Te. (905)886-0335 Fax:po5)8867323 41) E-Mail:info@Iinkpipe.)om htpp://www.linkpipe.com No-Dig Rehabilitation For Underground Pipes Special Features • No water bypassing is needed during Grouting Wee TM repair. • Injection sealing has a short service life, while Gro. Ling SleevesTM can be used to provide a permanent seal. • Sleeves with factory cut holes can be placed right over a service lateral without service interruption. This installation to des only a few extra minutes. • An inspection crew can make emergency repairs- while inspecting the sewer. ; Structural Life Unlike many other sewer relining methods, application of t:,e LINK-PIPE Grouting SleeveTM results in a permanent structural repair of the underground pipe. Through the formation of a composite structure with the host pipe, the LINK-'. iPE Grouting SleeveTM forms a new flexible structure that is often stronger than the original.. A Grouting SleeveTM repair will even assist in restoring an exist g underground pipe to its original design life. The cracks in the host pipe indicate tht all the stresses have been relieved from that pipe. The Grouting Sleeves" maintain y the proper alignments of the pieces in the old pipe arch. The resulting composite st.ucture has the needed flexibility to respond to further ground movements without failing as the-original pipe did. Since the Grouting SleeveTM is a nearly entirely elastic structure ,unlike plastic and resin based liners, it will not permanently change its shape when exp sed to long-term loads.. The standard sleeve is.designed for 5-psi (0.33 bar) external by 'raulic working pressure and tested for 15-psi.(I bar) external working load, which provi Os.a Factor of Safety of 3. if the owner's engineer calls for higher pressure, the sieev is custom designed to meet this requirement. All tunnel liners that are made of meta , vitrified clay or metal reinforced mineral materials, are designed for a loading condit n that has a 200 year statistical frequency, i.e. a probable 200 year working load. The structures made of elastic materials, return to the original hape without leaving a permanent deformation when the applied load is removed. G,outing SleevesTM have been tested for 100-psi short-term internal pressure in water ain applications. (This 6 ss®r M:\General Description of Gro ping Sleeve-Rev.03.doc Mhmoe at=y Link-PipeTM. Gas Sealer'"' Grouting Sleeve7" are trademarks of Link-Pipe Inc. Grouting Sleeve is pro; ted by U.S. Patent No. 5,351,720,European No.0630458, 84,Canadian and PCT by US Patent No 6,138,718 Patent Pressure Sleeve Australian ts protected by Canadian7andn Patents International Patents `. Gas Sealer is protected ��4781011r r Q 27 West Beaver Gree Rd., Unit#2, Richmond Hill,Ontario I Canada 14 P E 13'1M8 Tel.{905)'866-0335 Fax:(9D5)886 7323 CP 11 ISI KIPP E-Mail:info@linkpipe. Om htpp:llwww.linkpipe.com No-Dig Rehabilitation For Underground Pipes requires special quality control in grout application. Please c ..nsult Link-Pipe inc. for further details.) To find the 200-year load, a Factor of Safety of 2.25 multipliesthe working load. Link- Pipe inc. recommends a Factor of Safety of at least 2.25. This ; ssures all GROUTING SLEEVETM repairs to have a structural life of over 200 years. Chemical Environment 1 f SST-316 is considered chemically unaffected by regular d estc sewage and is expected to outlast its structural life of 200 years. Indust al effluents, especially electrolytes, need special consideration and require co-opera ion between the owner and manufacturer's engineers. li i Referring to the report of Mr. Arthur H. Tutthill*, recent inspe,tions have shown that "Atmospheric corrosion resistance of 316/31`6L (stainless steel.,is outstanding even in the enclosed moist environments with H2S and other the ical species normally present." Corrosion of stainless steel is very localized. This m ns that if corrosion did occur it " would be unlikely to affect the structural integrity-of the repair sleeves. Localized corrosion of stainless steel is of the pinhole type` not massive general corrosion as occurs with carbon steel and copper based alloys". i Mr. A,H.Tutthill did a thorough investigation in an environment c ntaining the chemicals specified by A.S.T.M. F1216 (tap water, nitric acid, phosphric acid, sulfuric acid, gasoline, vegetable oil, detergent, soap) and non-specified mate,ials which possibly can be found in the sewers as products of the decomposition of the ewers such as sewage, ammonia, fruit juices, sugar, vinegar, muriatic acid, and Hydron Sulfide (H2S). That study showed that"Types SST 316 can be expected to provide ,°00-200 ppm resistance to general corrosion two foot long repair sleeves in municipal s ewer piping." Chlorides have been found to affect stainless steel and cause corrosi when found in large concentrations. Tutthill found that "Since most natural waters ave considerably less than 200 ppm chlorides, LINK=PlPE's selection of 316' stainl ;ss steel for the repair sleeve is logical and in accordance with existing data and od practice, even for waters with greater than 200 ppm chlorides " € i Finally, "Chlorine is the only agent that might lead to the gene-al pitting in the vapour phase. However, it is most likely that any residual chlori reaching the waste collection piping would be rapidly consumed by the sewag :; and other oxidizable chemicals present, minimizing the possibility that high residual ichlorine would lead to significant corrosion of 316 stainless steel." 7 i \g0 900f M:\General Description of Gro Ong Sleeve-Rev.03.doc Link-Pipe1M' Gas Sealer1M Grouting Sleevee"" are trademarks of Link-Pipe Inc. Grouting Sleeve is prat icted by U.S. Patent No. 41111117. 5,351,720,European Patent No.0530458,Australian Patent No.872784,Canadian and PCT Patents Pendin 4 Gas Sealer is protected sue, 4- by US Patent No.6,138,718.Pressure Sleeve is protected by Canadian and International Patents Pending. Wanele I . . . . INK pEc, 27 VUestBeaver Cree Rci., Unit#2, Ricfimand Hilt,Ontario K-P 1 Ganada L46 1MB Tet,(9U5)888-i1335 Fax:(9D5)896 -7323 E=Mail:info@Iinkpipe. m htpp://www.tinkpipe.com No-Dig Rehabilitation For Underground Pipes Life time of construction materials All sewer rehabilitation products should prove their design se tviceability and material durability over time. The Service Life and Structural Stren th are two of the most. important parameters to the End-User because the actual co>t cannot be calculated without them. The service life of a repair is dependent on (resistance to chemical erosion, abrasion and resistance to superimposed loads. The erosion is important since soft materials could be greatly ected by abrasion and some resins are susceptible to chemicals involved in domesti; sewage. In domestic sewage mainly hydrogen sulfide, other fermentation by-produ e s and their derivatives are involved. In small amounts solvents and electrolytes could I e present. Oils are known to speed the process of the breakdown of resin if reinforcing fibers get exposed and the oils are absorbed into matrix through wettingthe fiber surface. This will rapidly break down the resin matrix. The stainless steel core of the Grouting SleeveTm provides impenetrable cover to its grout sealant. It has been determined by the manufacturers o i the stainless steel that chemicals in domestic sewage do not affect SST-316. For special chemical environments Link-Pipe specifies coatings or Hastalloy sleeves. For chemical resistance in domestic sewage, Link-Pipe makes laim to a minimum 225- year service life. This claim is based on the actual recorded ultless performance of the stainless steel for over a 70 to 75 year period in real life sit ations. Chrysler Tower in New York and Savoy Hotel in London, projects built in 1920's, are the perfect example of the long lasting service life and long durability of t e stainless steel. The inspections made in 1993 by specialists of Steel Industry of N rth America and Nickel Institute reveal "no visible change". The canopies inspe ed have endured an environment more aggressive than can be found in domestic se (rage. To regulate abrasion resistance, the Public Ordinance Office the City of Hamburg, Germany, requires that all resin type repair sleeves be expose to 50 flushings with a 1800 psi (120 bar) test flusher using water mixed with a predete,mined amount of sharp sand. The passing of this test requires that fibre reinforcement ay not be exposed by this test. Materials that fail this test do not have the serviceability to be cost-effective. Link-Pipe Grouting SleeveTM easily withstands this test becausethe exposed material is stainless steel. The stainless steel in turn protects the grout Material used for sealing 8 Aso sna;, M:1General Description of Groi.'ing Sleeve-Rev.03.doc INE w.n,aek ti.a.er Lank-Pipe"" Gas SealerTM Grouting SleeveTM are trademarks of Link-Pipe inc. grouting Sleeve is pro tinted by U.S. Patent No. 5,b S51,720,European US Patent No.6, 38,718.tPressu Sleeve is 630458, rrotecedlian tbyt No.canal an and nternat o ai Patents Pendindian and PCT Patents pendin . Gat Sealer is protected t C01�4 Yp Y g• "�1F! i r ,, 27 west Beaver I✓ree Rd., 'Unit#2, Richmond Hill,Ontario plpEo Canada LAB 1M8 Tel (905)'886-0335 Fax:(905)886-7323 0 ill N K -Mail:info@link pipe.:cm htpp:/www.tinkpipe.com No-Dig Rehabilitation For Underground Pipes and securing the sleeve in place. On its own polyuret ne grout is rated by internationally recognized government testing to last 170 to 310 years. Stainless steel and polyurethane give the Grouting SleeveTM Is long service life now rated to exceed 100 years for a single sleeve and over 300 yeas for a double sleeve in domestic sewage. i Link-Pipe's Warranty r The backing and warranty as the manufacturer's offer to corrob rate long serviceability and durability of the Grouting SleeveTM comes in two stages. ,rSubject to professional supervision and Warranty Specifications Link-Pipe is offeri :g a 10-year Material Performance Warranty. Link-Pipe can make this commitment because of the extensive research that has been done on our products. i he most recent tests confirmed long lasting performance of the Grouting SleeveT"", a`:id we can make a long- term commitment to our products. The Warranty Certificate ite conditions must be observed. Certain conditions apply. P ;. 1 1 *Mr. Arthur H. Tuthill, M.Sc., P.Eng., is the president of Tuthil Associates Inc., 2903 Wakefield-Dr., Blacksburg, Va. 24060. He has investigated c6 t onion in potable water treatment plants for five years, and he has Conducted a 4ldwide survey of the performance of stainless steel piping in 4$,-chloride water ;i A graduate of the University of Virginia, Charlottesville (BS)„ and of Carnegy Tec ., Pittsburgh, Pa (MS), Tuthill is the author of many publicatirs in area of corrosion an a member of AWWA, The Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Indust T, and The American Association of The Corrosion Engineers. 9 8so Sao, M:\General Description of Grou ng Sleeve-Rev.03.doc DB Mare*�r Link-PipeTM Gas Seater" Grouting Steel/elm are trademarks of Link-Pipe Inc. Grouting Sleeve is prot-eted by U.S. Patent No. 5,351,720,European Patent No.0630458,Australian Patent No.672784,Canadian and PCT Patents Pendin ' Gas Sealer is protected ca 0�` by US Patent No.6,138,718.Pressure Sleeve is protected by Canadian and International Patents Pending. i 1 J • $ Associated Engineers, Inc. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 3311 E.SHELBY STREET,ONTARIO,CA 91764-4872 (909)980-1982 FAX(909)941-0891 in March 6, 2003 • ' ' Q° � ` � '' - Mr. Scott Snyder (en • A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. �� � � • 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— . Ayala Boring Claim Dear Mr. Snyder: We have reviewed the change order requests you submitted for the subject project. Each change order is described below with our findings. 1. Change Order No. 1 — Late Charge for Pay Estimate #3 in the amount of $2,967.29. We have reviewed both the Green Book and the City's contract documents and can find no place where you are entitled to late charges. Your request contained no explanation or reference to a contract provision that entitles you to late charges so we cannot respond. Please provide back-up for your request and we can review it. 2. Change Order Request for a total of $6,028.33 for costs incurred in connection with unmarked irrigation line on Juniper Avenue. This request is not the first time this item has been submitted. • In this case, as with the prior requests, we • cannot recommend approval, because you have failed to provide evidence to support your allegations that you and/or your construction crews were instructed to remove the irrigation line. Neither the Inspector nor the Construction Manager will confirm your statements that they instructed your construction crew to remove the pipeline. You have produced no field directive or approved change order to support your contention that the conversations took place. Given the lack of evidence, we must continue to withhold our approval of the request. 3. Change Order Request for $1,838.49, dated January 9, 2003, for alleged delay on August 7, 2002 for costs incurred in connection with a delay in construction activities caused by the delay in soils testing. In this request, you requested compensation for delays caused by the failure of the soils testing technician to 0:\30B-NO\2001\01-064\Final Delay Change Orders Response 3_06_03.doc PLANNING DESIGNING SURVEYING take compaction tests when you apparently thought he would arrive on site. Under the terms of the contract, this claim should have been submitted within thirty (30) days of the beginning of the delay, and within fifteen (15) days of the completion of the work. Section 6-6.4 Written Notice and Report, states, "If the Contractor desires payment for a delay as specified in 6-6.3 or an extension of time, it shall file with the Agency a written request and report of cause within 30 days after the beginning of the delay. The request for payment or extension must be made at least 15•days before the specified completion date. Failure by the Contractor to file these items within the times specified will be considered grounds for refusal by the Agency to consider such request." The claim for expenses associated with the delay was submitted significantly after the 30-day period, and clearly 15 days beyond the completion of the work. Further, you signed Change Order No. 2 which extended the contract completion time by 24 days without additional compensation and covered the time period of the claim. You were obligated to file this claim within those time frames and request that it be part of Change Order No. 2. Based on these findings, we cannot consider your request or recommend approval of the delay claim. 4. Change Order Request for $1,325.79, dated January 9, 2003 for delays on July 15, 2002. Please see our comments in item. No. 2. Again, because this request falls outside the required time frames, we cannot consider such a request. Yours truly, ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 1NC. ,047 / dry" ,/L�.•,j9y� ,.},r,•, Thomas R. Holliman, PE Senior Project Manager cc: George Harvilla,.PB-Fontana Ralph Roberts, A-E J.N. 01-064 0:\JOB-NO\2001\01-064\Final Delay Change Orders Response 3_06_03.doc Associated Engineers, Inc. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 3311 E.SHELBY STREET,ONTARIO,CA 91764-4872 (909)980-1982 FAX(909)941-0891 !r\`\ 14 March 6, 2003 G1(%to�C� Mr. Scott Snyder ` ..,. A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— Ayala Boring Claim Dear Mr. Snyder: We have reviewed the response from Ayala Boring, dated February 5, 2003 regarding their claim for extra compensation for the Sierra Avenue boring operation, as well as previous correspondence on this matter. According to our records, this claim began on August 29, 2002 when Ayala Boring sent you a letter in which they claimed they could not construct the balance of the Sierra Avenue casing due to excessive rocks. They stated that they had installed eighty (80) feet of casing, but were blocked by excessive rocks which required that they hand mine the remaining casing (61.27 feet, from a total footage of 141.27 feet). They notified you that the August 29, 2002 letter constituted their claim for extra work. We initially concluded that Ayala Boring failed to follow the terms of the contract regarding notification of the changed conditions before they proceeded. They subsequently stated in their December 9, 2002 letter that the reason for the claim was not a changed condition but a change in method, because they were required to go to a manned excavation process instead of the unmanned method they stated was in the contract document. Now in their February 5, 2002 letter, they once again return to the changed conditions basis for their claim stating that a changed condition was encountered after installing 80 feet of casing. If Ayala Boring encountered changed conditions as they stated in their August 29, 2002 and February 5, 2003 letters, then they must comply with the conditions of the contract found in Section 3-4 CHANGED CONDITIONS, in the Green Book in order to press a claim for extra compensation. This section clearly states that Ayala Boring had the responsibility to promptly notify the Engineer upon the discovery of a changed condition and before it was disturbed. If they did not follow these requirements, O:VOB-NO\2001\01-064\Final Ayala Boring Response 3_06_03.doc PLANNING DESIGNING SURVEYING this section states that they waive all claims in connection with the changed condition. Ayala Boring notified you in writing after they had begun the alleged extra work. They stated in their August 29, 2002 letter that they had begun the extra work that morning, thereby admitting they proceeded before A.D. General or the City gave them permission. A.D. General could not have given the City, notice of a changed condition and a chance to review the site conditions before they were disturbed because A.D. General was informed after the fact. Therefore, the notice contained in the letter failed to satisfy the prompt notification provisions and their comments regarding the response interval for the Engineer became irrelevant. Based on the correspondence received from Ayala Boring and our evaluation of the circumstances, we cannot recommend approval of any additional payment for the boring work. Yours truly, ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS INC. Thomas R. Holliman, PE Senior Project Manager cc: George Harvilla, PB-Fontana Ralph Roberts, A-E J.N. 01-064 0:\3OB-NO\Z001\O1-064\Final Ayala Boring Response 3_06_03.doc MAR-10-2003 09:28 Ayala Boring Inc. 909 350 0936 P.01/03 --j-R • 1.0150 Poplar Avenue,Fontana,California 92335-6395 ~� (� 'Telephone: (909) 350-8940 Facsimile: (909) 350-0936 State of California State of Nevada Statc of Arizona License No,358577 License No.• 37411) License No.103981 License Na 106123 ■ FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET Please deliver the following pages to; NAME: Carla Fax (909)350-7676 , — - citotlid� FIRM: City of Fontana Redevelopment Agency / Special Projects 0a Total number of pages including cover sheet: 3 DATE: March 10, 2003 E9 SENT BY: Kathy Please notify us immediately at (909) 350-8940 should you fail to receive all pages. REFERENCE: South Highland & Juniper Avenue Sewer .Improvements Fontana For your information, here is a copy of our latest correspondence about our claim on the above referenced project, As of this writing no meeting has been set to resolve this matter. Thank you for your assistance. Should you have any questions contact our office at (909)350-8940. MAR-10-2003 09:29 Ayala Boring Inc. 909 350 0935 P.02/03 MODE = MEMORY TRANSMISSION START=MAR-07 10:02 END=MRR-07 10:03 V.n' PILE NO.= 249 NO. COM APSR/NTWK STATION NAME/ PAGES PRO.NO. PROGRAM NAME TELEPHONE ND. 001 OK s 19195595502 002/002 —Ayals Boring Inc. — ***** ******************* ********** -- — ***** — 909 350 0936 *****,i010,,* r I „ "'--� 10150 Poplar Avenue,Pr,ntana,California 92335-6395 •• 7 yei � Telephone:(909)350-8940 t^'ac nil.;(909)350.0936 :Amu of[;h1il'ornit S1,r4 of NeqJu Stale of Arnow Licenie No.388577 Lrceq!:cNn.T7hIU t„i;cI+seNo I0T9BI Livcnye No.106123 "46 ,M FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET Please deliver the..following pages to: NAME: Jodie Fax (818)559-5502 FIRM; A.D, General Engineering Construction Inc. Total n.tunber of pages including cover sheet: 2 DATE: March 7, 2003 SENT Y: Kathy Please notify us immediately at.(909) 350-8940 should you fail to receive all pages. REFERENCE: South Highland&Juniper Avenue Sewer. Improvements Fontana The original is being mailed to your attention in today's mail. We fee] Associated Engineers will be receptive to a meeting so please contact our office at (90,9)350-8940 as soon as one has been set up. .- -. ------- - --- --- MAR-10-2003 09:29 Ayala Boring Inc. 909 350 0936 P.03/03 �"rp, • 10150 Poplar Avenue,Fontana,California 92335-6395 • y, z •_ , .• - Telephone: (909) 350 89401~acsimile: (909) 350-0936 wwwAvalhOrin;;,r;l)m � STATE Or CALIFORNIA �' LICENSE NO.:1llilY'! 'f`J` G rM STATE OF ARIZONA V I.ICIiNSE NO. 103981 LICENSE NO. IU012t STATE OP NEVADA 1,Icr,•,NU NO.374IR March 7, 2003 A.D. General Engineering Construction Inc. 2829 North Glenoaks Boulevard Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 Attention: Scott Snyder Reference: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements Fontana . Dear. Mr. Snyder: We are in receipt of a copy of Associated Engineers, Inc.'s letter dated March 6, 2003. Upon review of the letter, it is obvious that Associated Engineers is incorrectly stating the record by miss-interpreting our prior"notices" and various correspondences. Our August 29, 2002 letter constituted the Official Notice of Claim. Ayala was not directed to: 1. Cease all work, pending further investigation. 2. Request additional information. As for our description in the claim, the "change in method" was a direct result from a "changed condition" which required a "manned entry". Ayala acted responsibly by "properly" notifying the engineer upon discovery of a changed condition and "did not" disturb the condition. • Associated Engineering ignored the notice and all correspondence until the job was completed. Associated Engineers is creatively attempting to invalidate a legitimate claim. We previously suggested that a meeting be arranged for resolution. Again we suggest that a meeting be arranged to discuss/negotiate an equitable settlement. Please note that.Ayala has filed a Stop Notice pending settlement of this matter 'inc ely, a : ory In P . : , alaAr- Pres dent V RGA/kab TOTAL P.03 Mar 07 03 12: 45p 00000000000000000000. 559-5502 p. 2 ti.General Engineering Construction Inc, 2829 N.Glenoaks Blvd.Ste 1Uti11U1 •Burbank,Ca 9130C Phone(818)5594383• Fax(B18)559-S D2 M, sh 7, 2002 As 'elated Engineers, Inc. 33 F. Shelby Street Or .rio, CA 91764 RE South Highland Sewer Improvements Sewer Repair kyala Boring"Claim for Extra Work" Dt -Mr, Holliman, I e faxing over a copy of Ayala Boring response to your letter dated March 6, 2003 regarding the Extra Work Claim. Ayala Boring has requested again that a meeting be arrange to resolve the matter. Please advise as soon as possible as to when a meeting will be schedule. Yi .r prompt attention in this matter is required. Si :erely, c nyder President Mar 07 03 12: 45p 00000000000000000000. 559-5502 p. 3 MRR i7-2003 1Q=f1? cly alai Bur Ing 1nL. 9Gi'3 3"_.a B936 P.02/02 • 10150 Poplar Avenue.Fontana,Califonua 92335-6395 - _ ` ` R Telephone:(909) 350-8940 Facsimile: (909) 3S0-0936 ____________ __ www,,y:lltll)nrit .„, -1--\. .,Y. . .L.—A;,; A 1! ____,... STATE Or CALI4O411.1A LICENSE No Uits77 Olt' STATE or AprcbwA L[L i.N1•.MIl II11Y%I LICENSE NO IOhl73 OATC OF NENorm I.1L .Nh .N1 :114 III March 7, 2003 A.D. General Engineering Construction inc. 2829 North Glenoaks Boulevard Suite 106/101 . Burbank,CA 91504 Attention: Scott Snyder Reference: South Highland and Juniper Avenue.Sewer Improvements Fontana Dear Mr. Snyder: We are in receipt Or a ropy of Associated Engineers, Inc.'s letter dated March 6, 2003. • Upon review of the letter.it is obvious that Associated Engineers is incorrectly stating the record by miss-interpreting our.prior."notices"and various correspondences. Our August 29. 2002 letter constituted the Oti C1ai Notice of claim. Ayala was not directed to: 1. Cease all work, pending further investigation. 2. Request additional.information. As for our description in the claim, the "change in method" was a direct result from a "changed condition" which required a "manned entry". Ayala acted responsibly by "properly" notifying the engineer upon discovery of a changed condition and "did not" disturb the condition. Associated Engineering ignored the notice and all correspondence until the job was completed. Associated Engineers is creatively attempting to invalidate a legitimate claim. We previously suggested that a meeting be arranged for resolution. Again we suggest that a meeting be arranged to discuss/negotiate an equitable settlement. Please note that Ayala has filed a Stop Notice pending settlement of this matter inc'.ely, °rina.In / plat yala • Pre.s dent RGA/kah • TOTAL P.I? I Mar 07 03 12: 45p 00000000000000000000. 559-5502 p. 1 ./ 1111.General Engineering Construction Inc, 2E29 N.Gbncaka stud.Sb 1WWQ1 4 Burbank,Ca 91584 M (a16)56 -7t47$Fax($16)559,S502 FAX COVER,SHRFT DATE e RECIPIENT . 1kUo-) FAX ( ) PHOS1E # ( ) • COMPANY!_,_ A.D.GENERAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION MC. • SENDER FAX ( $18)559.5502 PHONE % ( $18 ) S59•/3$3 MESSAGE NUMBER OF PAGES(W/COVER SIIEE'I) 11.0.General Engineering Construction Inc, ••• ns29 N.CIona les Blvd.gee 10C,/101 •Burbank,Ca 91504 Phone(818)559-73B3•Fax(BIB)5691 March 5, 2003 Thomas R. Holliman Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 E. Shelby Street Ontario, CA 91764 Re: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Scwcr Improvements Dear Mr. Rothman, On February 7, 2003 A.D. Gcncral Engineering mailed and faxed Associated Engineers a response letter from Ayala Boring regarding the denial of their claim, for the"Extra Work" charges. Associated Engineers has failed to acknowledge and or respond to Ayala Boring's lei sr regarding their position on the"Extra Work." therefore,your prompt attention in this matter is required Sincerely, TdvJie Snyder Vice President 'd 20SS-6SS '00000000000000000000 dLe eo CO SO Jew From:'Roaina Seiver (909)360.0936 1o:semit bay= yj 10150 Poplar.Avenue Fontana,CA 92335 i �. Tat_(909)350- 940 Fax:(909)350-0936 y State urLrtira'nsa Ltretpt Na.3[i857 i __ — tc of Ncvada Lieemc No.3741I) �Zsr Sla 6 NC a. State of A:IGu11a Licem;c No.1039SI a.106123 February 5,2003 A.D.General Engineering, Inc. 2829 North(ilcnoaks Blvd,Suite 106\1(11 Burbank,CA 91504 Attention: Scott Snyder Reference: Sewer System Improvements SP-46-02 Fontana Subject: Response to Associated Engineers'letter dated January 28,2003 Gentlemen: We are in receipt of the letter from Thomas R.Ilolliman of Associated Engineers in response to Ayala Boring's letter dated December 9.2002, Associated Engineers is taking the position that Ayala Boring should have submitted a claim prior to commencement of the bore, Associated Engineers is failing to recognize the fact that Ayala Boring successfully bored 80' x 36"casing . before encountering conditions that required a change in the method of installation. A claim was not warranted prior to commencement of the bore as conditions that required a,change in the method of installation were not encountered until after installing 80'x 36"casing. Associated Engineers is also taking the position that Ayala Boring never provided written notice, This is incorrect as Ayala Boring faxed and mailed the Notice of Claim on August 29,2002,the day it was determined band mining watt required to complete the bore,copy enclosed, Associated Engineers was hilly aware Ayala Boring was proceeding and incurring significant extra cost as indicated by signed daily tickets referencing "extra time". Associated Engineers deliberately ignored A.yala Boring's Notiru of Claim until after the work was complete as they failed to respond until December 3,2002,ninety-six(96)days after the Notice of Claim was submitted, Ayala Boring fully understands that in a claim situation the claimant has a responsibility to provide written notice to the governing authorities immediately upon becoming aware of a problem. Ayala Boring provided written notice and continued performing, as they were never directed otherwise.Associated Engineers' denial after the fact is unjustified, Ayala Boring is well within its legal rights and will pursue this matter as necessary. Perhaps a meeting should be arranged for further discussion to resolve this matter. Sincerely, Ayala Boring.lnc, Ralph G. Ayala.I1I Vice President Enclosures • E 'd ZOSS-6SS '00000000000000000000 dLE =BO co SO -JeW U.General Engineering Construction Inge, ♦•• 2829 N.Glenoaks Blvd.Ste 108i1Q1 •Rllrbank,Cn 915Qq Phone(818)564-7363•Fax(818)S94." 02 FAX COVER SHEET March 5, 2003 FAX TO: George Harvilla Parsons Brinkerhoff 909 427-9169 FROM: Jodie Snydcr 3 Pages I 'd ZOSS-GSS '00000000000000000000 dLC CO CO SO JeW Harvilla, George From: Tom Holliman [tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 9:06 AM To: Harvilla, George Subject: Change Order Response- miscellaneous items gi Change Order Response Letter I... George, I have attached my response to the change orders we recieved from Scott for several items. He has submitted claims for late fees on his progress payment, the cost of replacing the irrigation line, and two delay claims. My letter is attached and basically says that we can't recommend approval. I am also preparing a memo to you regarding the Ayala Boring claim for your review I should have it done in a bit and we can talk about. Thanks, Tom Holliman Associated Engineers, Inc. • 1 Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 February 25, 2003 Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— Change Order Requests Dear Mr. Snyder: We have reviewed the four change order requests you have submitted on the subject project. Each change order is described below with our findings. 1. Change Order No. 1 — Late Charge for Pay Estimate #3 in the amount of $2,967.29. We have reviewed both the Green Book and the City's contract documents and can find no place where you are entitled to late charges. Your request contained no explanation or reference to a contract provision that entitles you to late charges so we cannot respond. Please provide back-up for your request and we can review it. 2. Change Order Request for a total of $6,028.33 for costs incurred in connection with unmarked irrigation line on Juniper Avenue. This request is not the first time this item has been submitted. In this case, as with the prior requests, we cannot recommend approval because you have failed to provide evidence to support your allegations that you and/or your construction crews were instructed to remove the irrigation line. Neither the Inspector nor the Construction Manager will confirm you statements that they instructed your construction crew to remove the pipeline. You have produced no field directive or approved change order to support your contention that the conversations took place. Given the lack of evidence we will continue to withhold our approval of the request. 3. Change Order Request for $1,838.49, dated January 9, 2003, fo all edged-delay on August 7, 2002 for costs incurred in connection with a delay i cn onstruction activities caused by the delay in soils testing. In this request you requested compensation for delays caused by the failure of the soils testing technician to C:\Documents and Settings\harvilla\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK5\Change Order Response Letter Irrigation Line_delays.doc take compaction tests when you apparently thought he would arrive on site. Under the terms of the contract this claim should have been submitted within thirty (30) days of the beginning of the delay, and within fifteen (15) days of the completion of the work. Section 6-6.4 Written Notice and Report, states, "If the Contractor desires payment for a delay as specified in 6-6.3 or an extension of time, it shall file with the Agency a written request and report of cause within 30 days after the beginning of the delay. The request for payment or extension must be made at least 15 days before the specified completion date. Failure by the Contractor to file these items within the times specified will be considered grounds for refusal by the Agency to consider such request." The claim for expenses associated with the delay was submitted significantly after the 30-day period, and clearly 15 days beyond the completion of the work. Further you signed Change Order No. 2 which extended the contract completion time by 24 days without additional compensation and covered the time period of the claim. You were obligated to file this claim within those time frames and request that it part of Change Order No. 2. Based on these findings we cannot consider your request or recommend approval of the delay claim. 4. Change Order Request for$1,325.79, dated January 9, 2003 for delays on July 15, 2002. Please see our comments in item No. 2. Again because this request falls outside the required time frames we cannot consider such a request. Yours truly, ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS INC. Thomas R. Holliman, PE Senior Project Manager CC: George Harvilla, PB-Fontana Ralph Roberts, A-E C:\Documents and Settings\harvilla\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK5\Change Order Response Letter Irrigation Line_delays.doc • Harvilla, George From: Ralph Roberts [coralph@earthlink.net] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 5:07 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: Re: S. Highland Ave Sewers- Friday's Work 10-4 Boss, Will be there 10:00am on Tues. . . . Harvilla, George wrote: > Scott, > We'll see you on-site Tuesday at 10:00. You already know this, but > installation requires a compressor, an inflatable bladder, and video > camera, etc. > > George > Original Message > From: scott@adgenengr.com [mailto:scott@adgenengr.com] Sent: Thursday, > February 27, 2003 12:10 PM > To: Harvilla, George > Subject: RE: S. Highland Ave Sewers - Friday's Work > George, > Spoke with vendor this morning, they did not ship until today because > they > wanted our > fed tax id number. Wish I would have known this sooner, thought it was > coming this > last Tues, 2/25. Should arrive Friday, 2/28/03, they say, I'll let you > know > for sure. > OK, partly due to shipping installation will be Tues, 3/4/03, but > mainly because I ordered a demo practice set. Have some experience > with this now but think it's best > to practice with this demo set and Mon is the only day. Also since our > Utility truck > is out of commission I worry about not having a needed tool. Monday gives > time for a > problem free installation Tues. We want to do this right the first > time as > I'm sure > you do as well. > Sleeve can go in wet so even if raining some we plan on working. To avoid > school > lunch hour probably be on site 10:00am and set up. Actuall sleeve > installation once > in place is only 20-30 minutes set time. I figure an hour total from > set up > to move > off. > Scott A. Snyder > On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 10:47:37 -0800 (PST) , "Harvilla, George" wrote: 1 I » Scott, » Let me confirm your e-mail: The grouting sleeve will arrive » Thursday, > Feb. » 27, and you plan on doing the repair either Monday, Mar 3, or Tuesday, > March » 4. Is this correct? >> George » Original Message » From: scott@adgenengr.com [mailto:scott@adgenengr.com] Sent: » Thursday, February 27, 2003 1:48 AM » To: tomh@assoc-eng.com >> Cc: Harvilla, George » Subject: S. Highland Ave Sewers - Friday's Work » Bryan was in an accident with our utility truck (he is OK) and it had » to > be » towed to » the yard until ins gives us a repair shop to tow it to. I am making » arrangements for another truck however I will not be able to get » anything for Friday's > work, » need to » set up for Tuesday 3/4 at very latest for repair. Also the clamp » still has » not >> arrived yet, expect it on Thursday. Also we had two rain day's this week > on » job site » in Ventura Co which has compounded things putting everything behind » schedule. I am sorry but I cannot do anything else, I would if I » could. » Scott A. Snyder » A.D. General Engr. Const. Inc. ralphi 2 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 1:49 PM To: 'scott@adgenengr.com' Cc: 'Ralph Roberts'; Ralph Roberts at Home (coralph@earthlink.net); Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org); Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org); 'Carlos Navarro'; 'Tom Holliman' Subject: RE: S. Highland Ave Sewers- City of Fontana Scott, Ralph Roberts will be on site at 11:00 Friday to meet with Bryan. I will arrive as soon as my 10:00 meeting finishes. Tom Holliman is out of the office until Monday, so please send any e-mails to Ralph Roberts and me. Ralph's phone number is 909-376-0053 and mine is 909-427-9166. George Original Message From: scott@adgenengr.com [mailto:scott@adgenengr.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 11:36 AM To: tomh@assoc-eng.com Cc: Harvilla, George Subject: S. Highland Ave Sewers - City of Fontana Tom, Repair work on the sewer main are scheduled for Friday, 2/28/03. Bryan and a Laborer will be on site at 11:00 am to set then begin work. Mr. George Harvilla was cc'd thus is receiving this notice also. If a time change occurs I will inform you immediately, none is foreseen however. Thank you, Scott A. Snyder • Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 1:17 PM To: 'ralphr@assoc-eng.com' Subject: FW: S. Highland Ave Sewers - City of Fontana Ralph, Can you be there Friday at 11:00? I have a 10:00 meeting, I will do my best to be there. George Original Message From: scott@adgenengr.com To: torah@assoc-eng.com Cc: Harvilla, George Sent: 2/26/03 2:36 PM Subject: S. Highland Ave Sewers - City of Fontana Tom, Repair work on the sewer main are scheduled for Friday, 2/28/03. Bryan and a Laborer will be on site at 11:00 am to set then begin work. Mr. George Harvilla was cc'd thus is receiving this notice also. If a time change occurs I will inform you immediately, none is foreseen however. Thank you, Scott A. Snyder 1 South Highland Sewer Stop Notices Page 1 of 2 ,r. Harvilla, George From: Tom Holliman [tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 8:27 AM To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: South Highland Sewer Stop Notices Hi George, I got the stop notices from Carla, I haven't heard from Scott. I don't think that rain is a legitimate tactic since he never notified us of his anticipated start time as required. If he had set a start date for the repairs then maybe some time for rain. Therefore the deadline still stands, however I will try and contact him one more time. Thanks, Tom Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 10:40 AM To: 'tomh@assoc-eng.com'; Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org) Subject: RE: South Highland Sewer Stop Notices Tom, I haven't heard form Scott. Please call him for an update. Will he claim the rain has delayed him? Carla, Please fax the bonding information to Tom. Thanks. George Original Message From:Tom Holliman [mailto:tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 5:03 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: South Highland Sewer Stop Notices Hi George, I got the stop notices from Carla. Have you heard anything from Scott? I was going to call him tomorrow if you don't hear from him and ask him what his plans are, unless you want to do the honors. I will be out of town starting Wednesday at noon, until the following Monday,which will cover the deadline. I'm going to have the front desk let you know if Scott calls in while I'm out of town. If we don't get any response by Friday I will draft up the letter to the bonding company. As a side note I never recieved a copy of the fully executed contract documents with all of the certificates and his bonds so I don't know who the bonding company is. Could Carla fax me a copy of his performance bond so I can get the data in case we need to send a letter on Monday. I want to draft it for your review before I leave on Wednesday so we can send it by registered mail on Monday morning if we don't get 2/26/2003 With Highland Sewer Stop Notices Page 2 of 2 any response. Tom Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 1:58 PM To: Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com) Subject: FW: South Highland Sewer Stop Notices FYI Original Message From: Carla Pursel [mailto:cpursel@fontana.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 12:51 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: South Highland Sewer Stop Notices George I've sent this info out to Tom today. And no, there were no other notices received than those you identified. However, I have spoken to Cathy @ Ayala Boring (02/12/03) she had asked if the job has been finaled because they are still due some money plus the claim they filed. But they have yet to file a stop-payment notice (maybe pending?). Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 3:04 PM To: Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org) Cc: Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com) Subject: South Highland Sewer Stop Notices Hi Carla, Which companies have sent you Stop Notices so far? I have copies of Olson Precast ($19,660) and Robertsons ($7,683.69). Do you have any others? If so please make copies for me. Also, can you mail Tom Holliman clean copies of all the Stop Notices you have? Thanks, George 2/26/2003 Associated Engineers, Inc.kik CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 3311 E.SHELBY STREET,ONTARIO,CA 91764-4872 (909)980-1982 FAX(909)941-0891 • n�S � - r ` ;\ February 18, 2003 `,,s *47 `°'�\. Mr. Scott Snyder 1,- '..'i �SI f tz;; 4�1 A.D. General Engineering Construction Inc. Q. tt ��®� �''J' 2829 N.Glenoaks Blvd. • \``. e,%' Suite 106/101 ` ' > Burbank, CA 91504 • Subject: South Highland Sewer Improvements—Sewer Repair Dear Mr. Snyder: We are in receipt of your letter dated February 7,2003 notifying us that you have been unable to make the required repairs to the South Highland Sewer Improvements because you have not received a signed, approved, shop drawing for your alternative repair method. It is our understanding from the City of Fontana that those drawings were sent to you by overnight mail and should have been received by today. Even though you received emails indicating that the alternative had been approved,you have elected to require a signed shop drawing before you will proceed. You now have two approved methods for repairing the sewer pipe. The first, which has been available to you since November 2002,is to dig down to the damaged pipe and replace it with new pipe per the contract specifications. The second method, which the City has approved in order to allow you the flexibility to choose a method,is to install a repair sleeve. Given the delays in prosecuting these repairs, the City requires that the repair work be completed no later than 5:00 P.M. on Friday,February 28,2003. If repairs are not completed,using either of the two approved methods by that date and time, we will notify your performance bonding company on Monday,March 3, 2003 that you have failed to complete the work and we will be looking to them to complete the repairs. When you have determined your start date,you must notify us 48 hours in advance by email or regular mail so that an inspector can be on site to witness the repair work. Time is of the essence in making these repairs and completing this project., • If you have any questions, please contact Mr. George Harvilla or myself. Yours truly, • . ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS,INC. , 1-641k. liteeort:(74 . . Thomas R. Hull iman, PE Senior Project Manager .PE cc: George Harvilla, PB=Fontana , Ralph_Roberts,A-E J.N. 01-064 O:\300•NO\2001\O1.064\Final RepalrNotice to AD General.doc PLANNING DESIGNING SURVEYING February 18,2003 Mr.Scott Snyder A.D.General Engineering Construction Inc. 2829 N.Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank,CA 91504 1.e t\ Subject: South Highland Sewer Improvements—Sewer Repair Dear Mr.Snyder: fit4 :€ \A We are in receipt of your letter dated February 7,2003 notifying us that you have been unable to make the Cyr required repairs to the South Highland Sewer Improvements because you have not received a signed, tr approved,shop drawing for your alternative repair method. It is our understanding from the City of Fontana that those drawings were sent to you by overnight mail and should have been received by today. Ir O Even though you received emails indicating that the alternative had been approved,you have elected to 0 require a signed shop drawing before you will proceed. You now have two approved methods for repairing the sewer pipe. The first,which has been available to you since November 2002,is to dig down to the damaged pipe and replace it with new pipe per the contract specifications. The second method,which the I./ tvi City has approved in order to allow you the flexibility to choose a method,is to install a repair sleeve. c „1„+ /^bw f) /P '" C'b 14\r 1.4/4 na- �.,. ��.,+, r, Given the delays in prosecuting these repairs,the City requires that the repair work be initiated no9afer than Friday,February 28,2003. If y no t,brlire aPZ1*begin‘repairs,using either of the two approved methods,by that date we will notify your performance bonding company on Monday,March 3,2003 that you have failed to complete the work and we will be looking to them to complete the repairs. When you have determined your start date,you must notify us 48 hours in advance by email or regular mail so that an inspector can be on site to witness the repair work. Time is of the essence in making these repairs and completing this project. If you have any questions,please contact Mr.George Harvilla or myself. Yours truly, ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS,INC. Thomas R.Holliman,PE Senior Project Manager cc: George Harvilla,PB-Fontana Ralph Roberts,A-E J.N.01-064 C:\Documents and Settings\harvilla.W-SBNCN29\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK6\Final RepairNotice to AD General.doc o. Associated Engineers, Inc. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 3311 E.SHELBY STREET,ONTARIO,CA 91764-4872 (909)980-1982 FAX(909)941-0891 February 13, 2003 /g;. ,.` �w ' cs,,)i Mr. Scott Snyder 3 .‘10, N r) A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. (5)� 4 1 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. e.r,, %V� Suite 106/101 �' �' Burbank, CA 91504 Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue . Sewer Improvements—Repairs Dear Mr. Snyder: On January 28, 2003, we requested that AD General complete repairs on the damaged portion of the subject project by February 14, 2003. As of this writing, we have not received word when you are going to complete the repairs. However, due inclement weather during the week of February 9, 2003, we recognized that repair work could not have been done. We are, therefore, allowing you an additional week to complete the repairs. All repairs to the South Highland Sewer Improvements must be completed by 5:00 PM, Friday, February 21,2003. Time is of the essence in completing the repairs, as this is remaining work that prevents us from filing a Notice of Completion on the project. We believe that the City has been cooperative and patient in • working with you to find an acceptable repair solution. You have two approved methods to make the repairs, but this work must be prosecuted without delay. If repairs are not completed by the requested time, we will be forced to direct the request for repairs to your Performance Bonding company. It is important that you communicate when the repairs will take place so that our inspector can be present to observe the work. Please contact Mr. George Harvilla, or myself, by phone, regular mail, or email at your earliest convenience when you have determined the start of the repair work. If you need any assistance,please let us know. Yours tru•y, / �y ASS TED ENGIN �. ti i homas:R. Holliman, PE Senior Project Manager cc: George Harvilla,PB-Fontana Ralph Roberts, A-E J.N. 01-064 C:\TEMP\Second request for repairs letter.doc PLANNING DESIGNING SURVEYING Feb 13 03 12: 46p 00000000000000000000. 553-5502 p. 2 A.D.General Engineering construction Inc, 2829N,GtehoaKs BIVtl,Ste 106/101 • Burbank,Ca 91S:34 Phone(818) -7383♦ Fax(818)559-5E02 Fel _Lary 7, 2003 Mr Thomas Holliman As, elated Engineers, Inc,, 33 Shelby Street On rio, CA 91764-4872 Sul .ct: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements Repair to Damaged Sewer Main De Mr. Holliman, In i aly to your letter dated January 28, 2003, 1 will know mote of A.D. General's plans reg ding this repair whenever the"Agencies Representatives"get around to responding, and reti ning our submittal. Until then I don't know if my proposed repair method will be approved or: 1t. Ar by the way, 1 didn't want to be pushy but not having heard anything while patiently waiting sin. viewing the video back on November 13, 2002. I have made some polite inquires, which hat gone unanswered, And thus Mr. Holliman, 1 am not able to answer your letters questions nor ddress your comments. Sin :rely, Scc A. Snyder - Pre lent A..I General Enl leering Construction Inc., Feb 13 03 12: 46p 00000000000000000000. 559-5502 p. 1 � . Engineering�� , '� :`� D.General En erin 9 ••e►D Construction Inc., IA( 2#329 • N.Glenoaks Blvd.Slc 1061101 •Burbank,Ca 915J4 Phone(818)551 .739a♦Fax(818)559-59,2 Fel .►ary 13, 2003 FA COVER SHEET: FA TO: Thomas Holliman FR M: Scott A.Snyder De Mr. Holliman, We ave responded with the attached letter sent by fax on Febuary 7, 2003 and the origna[was ma d. FLY _ J2 Associated Engineers, Inc.kik CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 3311 E.SHELBY STREET,ONTARIO,CA 91764-4872 (909)980-1982 FAX(909)941-0891 F r / A 6 e(aFEBC 1 EB January 28, 2003 RECEIVED REDEVELOPMENT/ Mr. Scott Snyder ` A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— Repairs to Damaged Sewer Main Dear Mr. Snyder: This letter is being sent to request that A.D. General make repairs on the damaged sewer main on the South Highland and Juniper Avenue sewer project by February 14, 2003. We have not received any word from you on when you plan to make the repairs, but enough time has passed since the videotape was viewed on November 13, 2002 to afford you ample opportunity to select a repair method and make the repairs. As you may recall that during that viewing, you acknowledged that this work was the responsibility of A.D. General and asked the City for time to determine how you were going to implement repairs. You subsequently requested that a sleeve insert style repair be approved by the City, which the City has approved. Given that you have two (2) options for repairing the sewer main, there should only be the matter of scheduling the work. If you will not be able to meet that deadline or have any questions, please contact me at (909) 980-1982. Yours truly, AS OTED ENGINEERS INC. 7 , Thomas R. Holliman,PE Senior Project Manager cc George Harvilla,PB-Fontana Ralph Roberts,A-E J.N.01-064 O:\JOB-NO\2001\01-064\Sewer Repair Notice.doc PLANNING DESIGNING SURVEYING �-i THE c. �A rr '" /O lilt l'iN � I�Y -7 N City of Fontana .., ofrok " �4 ' �- = CALIFORNIA -,„„,,,„:,,i,„3 , ,,,...../...„ ..„ 1 ,c),,,N40-:0%* ..?:, . , ,N, CA,,--,2114111:_.„...,,,,,.„) 4. i_44 , CiN Nib ` 0 ._ i February 14, 2003 /r. Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. GENERAL ENGINEERING 2829 North Glenoaks Boulevard Suite 106/101 Burbank, California, 91504 Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements - Repair Approval Dear Mr. Snyder: Please find enclosed your approved submittal describing your proposed repair technique for the South Highland Sewer. Respectfully, 1/16140 ore Ha a �. Consultant Project Manager enclosure cc: Raymond Bragg, Redevelopment/Special Projects Director Thomas Holliman, Associated Engineer Carlos Navarro, Public Works Inspector Supervisor www.fontana.org 8353 SIERRA AVENUE FONTANA, CALIFORNIA 92335-3528 (909) 350-7600 A.D.General Engineering Construction Inc., ♦e♦ 2829 N.Glenoaks Blvd.Ste 106/101 ♦ Burbank,Ca 91504 Phone(818)559-7383• Fax(818)559-5502 December 10,2002 City of Fontana AppRovE Attn: Carlos Navaro D 8353 Sierra Ave. A Fontana, CA 92335 Submittal: For point repair method on 10"V.C.P. sewre main. Will use 10"X36"grouting sleeve. C.C. George Harvilla • • 27 West Beaver Creek Rd., Unit#2, Richmond Hill,Ontario 414 PIPE Canada L4B 1M8 Tel:(905)886-0335 Fax:(905)886-7323 E-Mail:info@linkpipe.com htpp://www.linkpipe.com No-Dig Rehabilitation For Underground Pipes General Description of the Link-Pipe LIPPROVEOcIN, Groutin g Sleeve TM Repair Method History Link-Pipe Inc. was founded in 1980 with the idea to develop dependable repair methods for underground pipelines with minimal disruption to the area of repair. Unlike other • repair methods that require barricades and troublesome excavation, the products produced by Link-Pipe Inc: require minimal disruption to busy streets filled with rush- hour traffic and additional hectic areas of the city. • Lembit Maimets registered the first US Link-Pipe Spot Repair sleeve patent in 1978. These sleeves came commercially to the market in 1980. This makes Link-Pipe Inc. the oldest commercially available Spot Repair technology in the world. The original Stainless SteelTM sleeve came to the market in 1,989, and the improved Grouting SleeveTM using Stainless Steel has been on the market since 1993. Performance Standards The Link-Pipe Grouting SleeveTM sewer repair technology is a trenchless mechanical spot repair that does not involve a large front-end investment. It can be purchased just like a simple piece of hardware and is ideal for emergency repairs due to the short amount of time needed from the time the need for repair is spotted to the completed installation. Unlike many other sewer relining methods, application of the Grouting Sleeve results in permanent structural repair of the underground pipe. Forming a composite structure with the host pipe, the Grouting Sleeve TM creates a new flexible structure that maintains its shape and proper alignment when exposed to long-term loads. This composite action of the host pipe and Grouting Sleeve TM is often stronger than the original and remains flexible enough to withstand future small earthquake movements. The Link-Pipe Grouting SleeveTM can: • • Restore partially collapsed pipes. • Restore sewers to full design life. • Replace collapsed pipes. • Re-align offset joints if not restrained by root penetration or other rigid materials. 1 ‘c,0 900, M:1General Description of Grouting Sleeve-Rev.03.doc rye 5e„>Y Link-PipeTM, Gas SealerTM, Grouting SteeveTM are trademarks of Link-Pipe Inc. Grouting Sleeve is protected by U.S. Patent No. 5,351,720, European Patent No, 0630458,Australian Patent No. 672784, Canadian and PCT Patents Pending. Gas Sealer is protected os by US Patent No.6,138,718.Pressure Sleeve is protected by Canadian and International Patents Pending. FAICpt��4 ® 27 West Beaver Creek Rd., Unit tt 2, Richmond Hill,Ontario UNIK Pi Canada L4B 1M8 Tel:(905)886-0335 Fax:(905)886-7323 E-Mail:info@linkpipe.com htpp://www.linkpipe.com No-Dig Rehabilitation For Underground Pipes • Repair sewer pipes without closing service laterals. • Repair pipe in preparation for restoring lost backfill. • "' ^, • Repair sewers without stopping flow. FF. ' } • Seal infiltrating cracked pipes and pipe joints. u �! 4 • Retard rood growth. • Seal abandoned services. • Close holes created by material loss in pipe walls. • Seal ex-filtration. Materials and Quality Control (Engineering and Manufacturing) All Link-Pipe Grouting SleevesTM have a Stainless Steel (SST 316) structural core. The annular space around the sleeve is filled with an absorbent polyurethane gasket, which is filled with polyurethane grout that will cure in contact with water or air. Curing is characterized by foaming action, which expands and fills the annular space between the structural Stainless Steel core and the host pipe. Expanding grout penetrates into pipe cracks and adjacent sandy soil. The pieces of damaged pipe are embedded in the urethane matrix and in turn are adhered to the Stainless Steel core, which form a new composite pipe structure. The new composite pipe, made up of the stainless steel reinforcement and the old masonry arch of the damaged pipe, eventually becomes - stronger than a new pipe. The newly repaired pipe, however, is stress relieved and can absorb soil movements without breaking. Grouting SleevesTM are available in diameters ranging from 4" (100 mm) to 48" (1200 mm) with standard. lengths of 18" (450 mm), 24" (600 mm) and 36" (900 mm). Continuous relining can be easily made by multi-installation or overlapping of the sleeves. Manufacturing of Grouting Sleeves TM follows precise engineering specifications and product quality control throughout the manufacturing process. Only two quality control measures remain to be inspected in the installation process: the amount of grout and locking of the sleeve in place. The latter are easily verified by visual inspection. Quality control on primary materials, Stainless Steel and the urethanes, takes place in the steel mills and the chemical refinery. Pertinent A.S.T.M. and C.S.A. standards are followed and Mill-test Reports are produced for each manufactured batch of material. At Link-Pipe, factory specific quality control standards are followed during the manufacturing process. This ensures that the dimensions of the sleeves are specified. 2 x6o Boo, • M:\General Description of Grouting Sleeve-Rev.03.doc Wunock Horsey Link-PipeTM Gas SealerTm, Grouting SleeveTM are trademarks of Link-Pipe Inc. Grouting Sleeve is protected by U.S. Patent No. n" '. 5,351,720, European Patent No. 0630458,Australian Patent No. 672784, Canadian and PCT Patents Pending. Gas Sealer is protected ,°� by US Patent No.6,138,718.Pressure Sleeve is protected by Canadian and International Patents Pending. 1e)?74100. uNK 27 Ee ! � ' E M htpp://www.linkpipe.com No-Dig Rehabilitation For Underground Pipes A factor of safety of at least 2.5 is applied in calculating the safe superimposed load. This ensures that every sleeve has a structural design life of over 100 years. Standard Equipment All Grouting Sleeve TM installation equipment is available on the open market except the Flow-through Plug, used for expanding the sleeves. With small exceptions, a contractor usually has the equipments before acquiring the sleeves. Following is a list of all the equipment required: • • 2 HP air compressor • Flow-through Link-Pipe Plug • Limit gauge and 1/4 inch air hose preferably with quick couplers • CCTV Camera for remote installation away from the manhole • Cable and reels, and other incidental construction equipment • Grouting Sleeve TM, Grout, and Grout Applicator come in the package with the sleeve. For small applications, a push-rod type drain camera is enough for emergency repairs up to 15 inches in diameter and up to 36 inches with an added light source have been made with this camera. For larger projects involving many sleeves, a main-line camera is more efficient. A special drain camera bracket is available and fits every Link-Pipe Sewer Plug. The installations Plug comes with a flow-through to reduce the necessity of water' by- pass. The Plug has also a special light for accurate control in locating the repair and wheels to keep the sleeve from being damaged during transport in the sewer. Installation Procedure . An installation, as described in detail in the brochure, may take. as little as 10 minutes, • but is strongly recommended that it should not last over 20 minutes. This is because after 20 minutes the grout starts curing. The speed of installation makes the Grouting SleeveTM very cost effective. The installation process is completely mechanical and needs no further attention once the sleeve is locked in place. Grout curing occurs outside stainless steel core and the • installation crew can proceed with work elsewhere. 3 ,t5o soo, M:\General Description of Grouting Sleeve-Rev.03.doc Wanwck Heney Link-Piper", Gas Sealer'", Grouting Sleeves"" are trademarks of Link-Pipe Inc. Grouting Sleeve is protected by U.S. Patent No. 5,351,720, European Patent No. 0630458,Australian Patent No.672784, Canadian and PCT Patents Pending. Gas Sealer is protected c, by US Patent No.6,138,718.Pressure Sleeve is protected by Canadian and International Patents Pending. `''47FlCP\Q • uNK P I ® West Beaver Creek Rd., Unit#2, Richmond Hill,Ontario Canada L4B 1M8 Tel:(905)886-0335 Fax:(905)886-7323 E-Mail:info@linkpipe.com htpp://www.linkpipe.com No-Dig Rehabilitation For Underground Pipes The repair retains its structural strength for the entire service life of the sleeve extending for over 100 years with the thinnest sleeve's metal core (0.6 mm) and becomes proportionally longer with increase thickness of the stainless steel. The advantage of low front-end equipment cost allows the city maintenance department to stock standard diameter sleeves and use them as the need arises. Stocking the sleeves allows rapid response to future emergencies. Advantages of the Link-Pipe Grouting SleeveTM Repair Method A preferred method is to have a small inventory of the most often-occurring sleeve sizes. Like hardware and other often used supplies, the Grouting SleeveTM can be stored in any ordinary warehouse and used when necessary. This enables fast emergency repairs and routine maintenance calls. The repair process itself becomes a convenient service call type of response. For larger repair projects, the factory produced Grouting SleeveTM makes it possible to combine the inspection and repair contracts into one. Compared to the double tender system of first allowing an inspection contract and several years later a repair contract, the combined inspection and repair can cut overall costs by approximately 50%. Because of the long service life of the sleeves, once the repair is made, it never has to be repeated again. This also means that no further expenditures on account of the sewer at this repair site need to be anticipated. Link-Pipe offers a long-term warranty to relieve the owners of any future worries.on this-account: • Sealing with the Grouting Sleeve TM Polyurethane used with the Grouting SleeveTM does not adhere to oily surfaces, just like epoxies 'or other sealing materials. The Grouting SleeveTM is designed' to stop the infiltration by creating a mechanical seal in the water passage with the polyurethane. • • As the expanding grout penetrates a crack, it will fill the crack and its surface roughness creating a mechanical bond. If the bond is broken, water will try to push the grout out of the crack. As the grout surface that comes .in contact with water pressure is compressed, it will simultaneously expand laterally forcing the grout tighter against the crack walls. • 4 Aso s0or M:\General Description of Grouting Sleeve-Rev.03.doc 1i1 Ws.nacM Naruy Link-Pipe'"', Gas Sealer'"", Grouting Sleeve'' are trademarks of Link-Pipe Inc. Grouting Sleeve is protected by U.S. Patent No. 5,351,720, European Patent No. 0630458,Australian Patent No.672784, Canadian and PCT Patents Pending. Gas Sealer is protected c��-[3- a by US Patent No.6,138,718.Pressure Sleeve is protected by Canadian and International Patents Pending. '"7lftepT- • 27 West Beaver Creek Rd., Unit#2, Richmond Hill,Ontario UN KMPIPECR) Canada L4B 1M8 Tel:(905)886-0335 Fax:(905)886-7323 E-Mail:info@linkpipe.com htpp://www.linkpipe.com No-Dig Rehabilitation For Underground Pipes The new Sealing SleevesTM are designed to overcome the need for multiple Grouting SleevesTM and are designed to push the liquid grout into the cracks before it cures. When the grout thus comes in contact with moisture on the crack walls, the curing process starts and the grout comes under increasing pressure as it expands. Therefore, first sealing with injection or a special Sealing SleeveTM achieves water tightness. Before the Sealing SleeveTM was offered, sealing was often achieved by installin�q multiple sleeves until full stop of water flow was achieved. The Grouting SleeveT , along with the Sealing Sleeve M, act both as an infiltration stop and structural repair in a manner that is unique in the sewer repair industry. The materials used for repairs have been proven over 70 years of use in construction in conduits, tunnels and areas where especially difficult operating conditions have been encountered, which makes the Link- Pipe short repair process exceptional. Using Stainless Steel as the Primary Material Stainless Steel provides a dependable structural material regardless of how long the load is applied. Even after a projected service life exceeding 100 years, no permanent deformations will occur under working loads. The advantages of the Grouting SleeveTM and reasons why the Link-Pipe Grouting SleeveTM is widely used: Factory Made - consistent high quality, high precision manufacturing ,ensures uniform quality for installations in the field; ' • Anyone can use this technology without making a major investment; The repairs are permanent; Traffic disruptions are minimal; . The repairs can be.done quickly, Toxic or environmentally hazardous chemicals are not used; Special materials and coatings are available for all chemical environments; Clear installation instructions are available for consistently high quality installations;'and The strength of the installed sleeve is not dependent upon the quality of workmanship as is the case with all other liners. Resin and epoxy based liners and structural grouts change their properties with changes in temperature in sanitary sewers. Conversely, the Grouting SleeveTM does not. 5 Aso 900, M:\General Description of Grouting Sleeve-Rev.03.doc ✓ITS'' ' Warnock Hency Link-PipeTM Gas SealerTm, Grouting Sleeve'"" are trademarks of Link-Pipe Inc. Grouting Sleeve is protected by U.S. Patent No. 5,351,720, European Patent No. 0630458, Australian Patent No. 672784, Canadian and PCT Patents Pending. Gas Sealer is protected c2., by US Patent No.6,138,718.Pressure Sleeve is protected by Canadian and International Patents Pending, UN 27 West Beaver Creek Rd., Unit#2, Richmond Hill,Ontario iciPIPE ® Canada L4B 1M8 Tel:(905)886-0335 Fax:(905)886-7323 E-Mail:info@linkpipe.com htpp://www.linkpipe.com No-Dig Rehabilitation For Underground Pipes Special Features • No water bypassing is needed during Grouting SleeveTM repair. • Injection sealing has a short service life, while Grouting SleevesTM can be used to provide a permanent seal. • Sleeves with factory cut holes can be placed right over a service lateral without service interruption. This installation takes only a few extra minutes. • • An inspection crew can make emergency repairs while inspecting the sewer. Structural Life Unlike many other sewer relining methods, application of the LINK-PIPE Grouting SleeveTM results in a permanent structural repair of the underground pipe. Through the formation of a composite structure with the host pipe, the LINK-PIPE Grouting SleeveTM forms a new flexible structure that is often stronger than the original. A Grouting SleeveTM repair will even assist in restoring an existing underground pipe to its original design life. The cracks in the host pipe indicate that all the stresses have been relieved from that pipe. The Grouting SleeveTM maintains the proper alignments of the pieces in the old pipe arch. The resulting composite structure has the needed flexibility to respond to further ground movements without failing as the original pipe did. Since the Grouting SleeveTM is a nearly entirely elastic structure, unlike plastic and resin based liners, it will not permanently change its shape when exposed to long-term loads. The standard sleeve is.designed for 5-psi (0.33 bar) external hydraulic working pressure and tested for 15-psi (1 bar) external working.load, which provides a Factor of Safety of 3. If the owner's engineer calls for higher pressure, the sleeve is custom designed to meet this requirement. All tunnel liners that are made of metals, vitrified clay or metal reinforced mineral materials, are designed for a loading condition that has a 200 year statistical frequency, i.e. a probable 200 year working load. The structures made of elastic materials, return to the original shape without leaving a permanent deformation when the applied load is removed. Grouting SleevesTM have been tested for 100-psi short-term internal pressure in water main applications. (This 6 Aso sour M:\General Description of Grouting Sleeve-Rev.03.doc Warnock Hersey' Link-Pipe7M, Gas SealerTM, Grouting SleeveTM are trademarks of Link-Pipe Inc. Grouting Sleeve is protected by U.S. Patent No. 5,351,720, European Patent No.0630458,Australian Patent No. 672784, Canadian and PCT Patents Pending. Gas Sealer is protected i+ 77Fsz fls by US Patent No.6,138,718. Pressure Sleeve is protected by Canadian and International Patents'Pending. `� pD�� ® 27 West Beaver Creek Rd., Unit#2, Richmond Hill,Ontario I__I. Canada L4B 1M8 Tel:(905)886-0335 Fax:(905)886-7323 E-Mail:info@linkpipe.com htpp://www,linkpipe.com No-Dig Rehabilitation For Underground Pipes requires special quality control in grout application. Please consult Link-Pipe Inc. for further details.) To find the 200-year load, a Factor of Safety of 2.25 multiplies the working load. Link- Pipe Inc. recommends a Factor of Safety of at least 2.25. This assures all GROUTING SLEEVETM repairs to have a structural life of over 200 years. Chemical Environment SST-316 is considered chemically unaffected by regular domestic sewage and is expected to outlast its structural life of 200 years. Industrial effluents, especially electrolytes, need special consideration and require co-operation between the owner and manufacturer's engineers. Referring to the report of Mr. Arthur H. Tutthill*, recent inspections have shown that "Atmospheric corrosion resistance of 316/316L (stainless steel) is outstanding even in the enclosed moist environments with H2S and other chemical species normally present." Corrosion of stainless steel is very.localized. This means that if corrosion did occur it " would be unlikely to affect the structural integrity of the repair sleeves. Localized corrosion of stainless steel is of the pinhole type, not massive general corrosion as occurs with carbon steel and copper based alloys". Mr. A.H.Tutthill did a thorough investigation in an environment containing the chemicals specified by A.S.T.M. F1216 (tap water, nitric acid, phosphoric acid, sulfuric acid, gasoline, vegetable oil, detergent, soap) and non-specified materials which possibly can . be found in the sewers as products of the decomposition of the sewers such as sewage, - ammonia., fruit juices, sugar, vinegar, muriatic acid, and Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S), That study showed that "Types SST 316 can be expected to provide 100-200 ppm resistance to general corrosion two foot long repair sleeves in municipal sewer piping." Chlorides have been found to affect stainless steel and cause corrosion when found in large concentrations. Tutthill found that "Since most natural waters have considerably less than 200 ppm chlorides, •LINK-PIPE's selection 'of 316 stainless steel for the repair sleeve is logical and in accordance with existing data and good practice, even for waters with greater than 200 ppm chlorides " Finally, "Chlorine is the only agent that might lead to the general pitting in the vapour phase. However, it is most likely that any residual chlorine reaching the waste collection piping would be rapidly consumed by the sewage and other oxidizable chemicals present, minimizing the possibility that high residual chlorine would lead to significant corrosion of 316 stainless steel." 7 ,t50 90o, M:\General Description of Grouting Sleeve-Rev.03.doc t1TSa Warnock Nancy Link-PipeTM, Gas Sealer1M, Grouting SleeveTM are trademarks of Link-Pipe Inc. Grouting Sleeve is protected by U.S. Patent No. 5,351,720, European Patent No. 0630458,Australian Patent No. 672784, Canadian and PCT Patents Pending. Gas Sealer is protected b '"'o� by US Patent No.6,138,718.Pressure Sleeve is protected by Canadian and International Patents Pending. )?T/FlCA'r jj N K PI ® 27 West Beaver Creek Rd., Unit#2, Richmond Hill,Ontario Canada L4B 1M8 Tel:(905)886-0335 Fax:(905)886-7323 E-Mail:info@linkpipe.com htpp://www.linkpipe.com No-Dig Rehabilitation For Underground Pipes Life time of construction materials All sewer rehabilitation products should prove their design serviceability and material durability over time. The Service Life and Structural Strength are two of the most important parameters to the End-User because the actual cost cannot be calculated without them. The service life of a repair is dependent on resistance to chemical erosion, abrasion and resistance to superimposed loads. The erosion is important since soft materials could be greatly affected by abrasion and some resins are susceptible to chemicals involved in domestic sewage. In domestic sewage mainly hydrogen sulfide, other fermentation by-products and their derivatives are involved. In small amounts solvents and electrolytes could be present. Oils are known to speed the process of the breakdown of resins if reinforcing fibers get exposed and the oils are absorbed into matrix through wetting the fiber surface. This will rapidly break down the resin matrix. The stainless steel core of the Grouting SleeveTM provides impenetrable cover to its grout sealant. It has been determined by the manufacturers of the stainless steel that chemicals• in domestic sewage do not affect SST-316. For special chemical environments Link-Pipe specifies coatings or Hastalloy sleeves. For chemical resistance in domestic sewage, Link-Pipe makes claim to a minimum 225- year service life. This claim is based on the actual recorded faultless performance of the stainless steel for over a 70 to 75 year period in real life situations. Chrysler Tower in New York and Savoy Hotel in London, projects built in 1,920's, are the perfect example of the long lasting service life and long durability of the stainless steel. The inspections made in 1993 by specialists of Steel Industry of North America and Nickel Institute reveal "no visible change". The canopies inspected have endured an environment more aggressive than can be found in domestic sewage. To regulate abrasion resistance, the Public Ordinance Office of the City of Hamburg, Germany, requires that all resin type repair sleeves be exposed to 50 flushings with a 1800 psi (120 bar) test flusher using water mixed with a predetermined amount of sharp sand. The passing of this test requires that fibre reinforcement may not be exposed by this test. Materials that fail this test do not have the serviceability to be cost-effective. Link-Pipe Grouting SleeveTM easily withstands this test because the exposed material is stainless steel. The stainless steel in turn protects the grout material used for sealing 8 ,so soon M:\General Description of Grouting Sleeve-Rev.03.doc tITS: Warnock Haney ' Link-PipeT" Gas SealerTM, Grouting Sleeve'"' are trademarks of Link-Pipe Inc. Grouting Sleeve is protected by U.S. Patent No. 5,351,720, European Patent No. 0630458,Australian Patent No. 672784, Canadian and PCT Patents Pending. Gas Sealer is protected o by US Patent No.6,138,718.Pressure Sleeve is protected by Canadian and International Patents Pending. CAe ® 27 West Beaver Creek Rd., Unit#2, Richmond Hill,Ontario P 1 Canada L4B 1M8 Tel:(905)886-0335 Fax:(905)886-7323 E-Mail:info@linkpipe.com htpp.//www.linkpipe.com No-Dig Rehabilitation For Underground Pipes and securing the sleeve in place. On its own polyurethane grout is rated by internationally recognized government testing to last 170 to 310 years. Stainless steel and polyurethane give the Grouting SleeveTM its long service life now rated to exceed 100 years for a single sleeve and over 300 years for a double sleeve in domestic sewage. Link-Pipe's Warranty The backing and warranty as the manufacturer's offer to corroborate long serviceability and durability of the Grouting SleeveTM comes in two stages. Subject to professional supervision and Warranty Specifications Link-Pipe is offering a 10-year Material Performance Warranty. Link-Pipe can make this commitment because of the extensive research that has been done on our products. The most recent tests confirmed long lasting performance of the Grouting SleeveTM, and we can make a long- term commitment to our products. The Warranty Certificate site conditions must be observed. Certain conditions apply. • *Mr. Arthur H. Tuthill, M.Sc., P.Eng., is the president of Tuthill Associates Inc., 2903 Wakefield Dr., Blacksburg, Va. 24060. He has investigated corrosion in potable water treatment plants for five years, and he has conducted a worldwide survey of the performance of stainless steel piping in low-chloride waters. A graduate of the University of Virginia, Charlottesville (BS), and of Carnegy Tech., Pittsburgh, Pa (MS), Tuthill is the author of many publications in area of corrosion and a member of AWWA, The Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry, and The American Association of The Corrosion Engineers. 9 `go sop, M:1General Description of Grouting Sleeve-Rev.03.doc ITS' Wu.wck Haney Link-Piper"', Gas SealerT', Grouting Sleeve'"" are trademarks of Link-Pipe Inc. Grouting Sleeve is protected by U.S. Patent No. 5,351,720, European Patent No. 0630458,Australian Patent No. 672784, Canadian and PCT Patents Pending. Gas Sealer is protected ��® by US Patent No.6,138,718.Pressure Sleeve is protected by Canadian and International Patents Pending. ` }Ip05� RE: Pipe Repair Page 1 of 1 Harvilla, George From: Carla Pursel [cpursel@fontana.org] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 2:37 PM To: Scott Snyder(scott@adgenengr.com); Scott Snyder(adgenengr@hotmail.com) Cc: Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com); Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com); Harvilla, George Subject: RE: Pipe Repair Importance: High Dear Scott N A letter authorizing the repair of the sewer pipe, as well as a "Stamped "Approved" copy of the submittal that you have requested, is being sent to you via Federal Express today. You should received these documents by Monday, or Tuesday at the latest depending on whether or not your offices are open in observance of the holiday (Monday - President's Day). Please feel free to contact me or George Harvilla, should you have any questions on this matter. Thank you. Carla Pursel CITY OF FONTANA Redevelopment/Special Projects Department 909.305.6792 2/17/2003 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 3:07 PM To: Scott Snyder(scott@adgenengr.com); Scott Snyder(adgenengr@hotmail.com) Cc: Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com); Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org); 'Ray Bragg'; Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com) Subject: Pipe Repair Scott, Today I received a copy of a letter you sent to Tom Holliman dated February 7, 2003 stating you still did not know if your proposed method of repair had been approved. As the e-mails below show: - You were notified on January 14, 2003 that your repair method was approved - A follow-up inquiry was e-mailed to you on January 22, 2003 - You responded on January 23, 2003 that you were were working on it Also, you did not ask for your submittal to be returned to you. I'm sure you kept a copy for your files, plus the same information is available on the web 24 hours per day at www.linkpipe.com. Tom Holliman issued a letter to you today stating the City's official position. Sincerely, George Harvilla Consultant Project Manager Original Message From: SCOTT SNYDER [mailto:adgenengr@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:10 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: Re: FW: Pipe Repair As soon as I get everything set up. Working on it, wont be long. >From: "Harvilla, George" <Harvilla@pbworld.com> >To: "Scott Snyder (scott@adgenengr.com) " <scott@adgenengr.com>, "Scott >Snyder (adgenengr@hotmail.com) " <adgenengr@hotmail.com> >CC: "Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com) " <tomh@assoc-eng.com> >Subject: FW: Pipe Repair >Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:40:04 -0500 >Scott, >When do you think you can begin the pip repair? >George > Original Message >From: Harvilla, George >Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 4:42 PM 1 `>To: Scott Snyder (adgenengr@directvinternet.com) ° >Cc <mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com)Cc> : 'Tom Holliman' ; Ralph >Roberts >(ralphr@assoc-eng.com <mailto:ralphr@assoc-eng.com> ) ; Ralph Roberts at >Home >(coralph@earthlink.net <mailto:coralph@earthlink.net> ) ; Carlos Navarro >(cnavarro@fontana.org <mailto:cnavarro@fontana.org> ) ; Ray Bragg >(rbragg@fontana.org <mailto:rbragg@fontana.org> ) ; Paul Balbach >(pbalbach@fontana.org <mailto:pbalbach@fontana.org> ) ; Carla Pursel >(cpursel@fontana.org) >Subject <mailto:cpursel@fontana.org)Subject> : Pipe Repair >Importance: High >Scott, >The City has approved your proposed method for repairing the South Highland >Sewer, using the Link Pipe Grouting Sleeve technique. The City requests >that the warranty be in the City's name and not A.D. General's, in case >A.D. >General ceases operations in the Fontana area in the future. >Please proceed with the repairs at your earliest possible convenience. >Before starting, contact Associated Engineers so Ralph Roberts can >observe the procedure. I would also like to be present during the >repair. >After the repairs, we will begin to close out the contract. >Sincerely, >George Harvilla MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus 2 Harvilla, George From: scott@adgenengr.com Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 10:13 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: Re: Pipe Repair Mr. George Harvilla, Return of a "Stamped Submittal" is proper procedure, per specifications and the "Official" means of providing direction by the Agency to the Contractor, A.D. General Engineering Construction Inc in this case. Submittals are stamped with the Agencies reply indicated by a check mark in a box next to one of the following comments, "Rejected Resubmit" , "No Exception Taken", "Approved With Comment" . Previously on this project on verbal direction and or approval A.D. proceeded on Good Faith, only to have the Agencies Reps not give the same. Those blatant acts cost A.D. thousands of dollars and I will not again be victim of the same. Comply with Contract Specifications before you demand action. And by the way the numerous Agency Reps on this project all want correspondence directly with them. However according to Associated Engineers everything from the Agency is to go through Assoc only. So do I disregard everything else like this E-mail for example, I am confused by this and want direction provided. With this direction I want assurance I will not be placed in such a difficult position again, for one may take undue offense from my informing them to speak with Associated not myself. Scott A. Snyder A.D. Gen. Engr. Const. Inc. On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 20:44:57 -0800 (PST) , "Harvilla, George" wrote: > Scott, > Today I received a copy of a letter you sent to Tom Holliman dated > February 7, 2003 stating you still did not know if your proposed > method of > repair had > been approved. As the e-mails below show: > - You were notified on January 14, 2003 that your repair method was > approved > - A follow-up inquiry was e-mailed to you on January 22, 2003 > - You responded on January 23, 2003 that you were were working on > it > Also, you did not ask for your submittal to be returned to you. > I'm sure > you kept a copy for your files, plus the same information is > available on > the web 24 hours per day at www.linkpipe.com. > Tom Holliman issued a letter to you today stating the City's official 1 > position. > > Sincerely, > > George Harvilla > Consultant Project Manager > Original Message > From: SCOTT SNYDER [mailto:adgenengr@hotmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:10 PM > To: Harvilla, George > Subject: Re: FW: Pipe Repair > As soon as I get everything set up. Working on it, wont be long. > >From: "Harvilla, George" <Harvilla@pbworld.com> > >To: "Scott Snyder (scott@adgenengr.com) " <scott@adgenengr.com>, > "Scott > >Snyder (adgenengr@hotmail.com) " <adgenengr@hotmail.com> > >CC: "Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com) " <tomh@assoc-eng.com> > >Subject: FW: Pipe Repair > >Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:40:04 -0500 > > > > > >Scott, > > > >When do you think you can begin the pip repair? > > > >George > > 1 > > > > > > Original Message > >From: Harvilla, George > >Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 4:42 PM > >To: Scott Snyder (adgenengr@directvinternet.com) > >Cc <mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com)Cc> : 'Tom Holliman' ; > Ralph > >Roberts »(ralphr@assoc-eng.com <mailto:ralphr@assoc-eng.com> ) ; Ralph > Roberts at > >Home »(coralph@earthlink.net <mailto:coralph@earthlink.net> ) ; Carlos > Navarro »(cnavarro@fontana.org <mailto:cnavarro@fontana.org> ) ; Ray Bragg »(rbragg@fontana.org <mailto:rbragg@fontana.org> ) ; Paul Balbach > >(pbalbach@fontana.org <mailto:pbalbach@fontana.org> ) ; Carla > Pursel > >(cpursel@fontana.org) > >Subject <mailto:cpursel@fontana.org)Subject> : Pipe Repair > >Importance: High > > > >Scott, > > > >The City has approved your proposed method for repairing the > South Highland > >Sewer, using the Link Pipe Grouting Sleeve technique. The > City requests > >that the warranty be in the City's name and not A.D. General's, > in case > >A.D. > >General ceases operations in the Fontana area in the future. 2 > > > >Please proceed with the repairs at your earliest possible > convenience. > >Before starting, contact Associated Engineers so Ralph Roberts > can observe > >the procedure. I would also like to be present during the > repair. > > > >After the repairs, we will begin to close out the contract. > > > > > >Sincerely, > > > >George Harvilla > MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. > <a href="http://mail.adgenengr.com/jump/http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus"> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus</a> • 3 a FAX yoo YEARS PARSONS 16689 Foothill Boulevard r•" BR1NCKERNOFF Suite 103 Fontana, CA 92335 e` 909-427-9166 Fax:909-427-9169 harvilla@pbworld.com To: /7"Pc - From: George Harvilla , )hy�/�� Date: 2 _ /3 —c D Project No.: Fax No.: op/ P s-s y _ s--5 v Z No. of Pages (including this page): y Subject: Comments: Over a Century of Engineering Excellence RESPONSE REQUESTED Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 3:07 PM To: Scott Snyder (scott@adgenengr.com); Scott Snyder(adgenengr@hotmail.com) Cc: Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com); Carla Purse! (cpursel@fontana.org); 'Ray Bragg'; Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com) Subject: Pipe Repair Scott, Today I received a copy of a letter you sent to Tom Holliman dated February 7, 2003 stating you still did not know if your proposed method of repair had been approved. As the e-mails below show: - You were notified on January 14, 2003 that your repair method was approved - A follow-up inquiry was e-mailed to you on January 22, 2003 - You responded on January 23, 2003 that you were were working on it Also, you did not ask for your submittal to be returned to you. I'm sure you kept a copy for your files, plus the same information is available on the web 24 hours per day at www.linkpipe.com. Tom Holliman issued a letter to you today stating the City's official position. Sincerely, George Harvilla Consultant Project Manager Original Message From: SCOTT SNYDER [mailto:adgenengr@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2 :10 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: Re: FW: Pipe Repair As soon as I get everything set up. Working on it, wont be long. >From: "Harvilla, George" <Harvilla@pbworld.com> >To: "Scott Snyder (scott@adgenengr.com) " <scott@adgenengr.com>, "Scott >Snyder (adgenengr@hotmail.com) " <adgenengr@hotmail.com> >CC: "Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com) " <tomh@assoc-eng.com> >Subject: FW: Pipe Repair >Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:40:04 -0500 > >Scott, >When do you think you can begin the pip repair? >George > Original Message >From: Harvilla, George >Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 4:42 PM 1 >To: Scott Snyder (adgenengr@directvinternet.com) >Cc <mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com)Cc> : 'Tom Holliman' ; Ralph >Roberts >(ralphr@assoc-eng.com <mailto:ralphr@assoc-eng.com> ) ; Ralph Roberts at >Home >(coralph@earthlink.net <mailto:coralph@earthlink.net> ) ; Carlos Navarro >(cnavarro@fontana.org <mailto:cnavarro@fontana.org> ) ; Ray Bragg >(rbragg@fontana.org <mailto:rbragg@fontana.org> ) ; Paul Balbach >(pbalbach@fontana.org <mailto:pbalbach@fontana.org> ) ; Carla Pursel >(cpursel@fontana.org) >Subject <mailto:cpursel@fontana.org)Subject> : Pipe Repair >Importance: High >Scott, >The City has approved your proposed method for repairing the South Highland >Sewer, using the Link Pipe Grouting Sleeve technique. The City requests >that the warranty be in the City's name and not A.D. General's, in case >A.D. >General ceases operations in the Fontana area in the future. >Please proceed with the repairs at your earliest possible convenience. >Before starting, contact Associated Engineers so Ralph Roberts can >observe the procedure. I would also like to be present during the >repair. >After the repairs, we will begin to close out the contract. >Sincerely, >George Harvilla MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus 2 02/13/2003 16:10 FAX Ij001 • **: ACTIVITY REPORT *** **s1c:f::9cg::c:ic$:*c :}::{c:}c:k:{c:$slc:9c:k:ac**:Ic:F:** ST. TIME CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID NO. MODE PGS. RESULT 01/28 11:08 7149734918 PARSONS BRINCKER 5259 AUTO RX ECM 4 OK 01'52 01/28 12:38 5260 AUTO RX G3 0 NG 00'43 0 #005 01/28 16:27 7149734918 PARSONS BRINCKER • 5261 AUTO RX ECM 3 OK 01'24 01/29 09:39 6264545226 5262 AUTO RX ECM 2 OK 00'37 01/29 10:10 909 889 1884 5263 AUTO RX ECM 16 OK 01'57 01/29 14:53 3507676 0099 TRANSMIT ECM 2 OK 00'38 02/03 11:49 • 2420322 0100 TRANSMIT ECM 1 OK 00'28 02/03 16:00 9094849084 HALL & FOREMAN 5264 AUTO RX ECM 4 OK 00'40 02/04 11:10 2139559885 5265 AUTO RX ECM 2 OK 01'01 02/04 12:04 9410891 0101 TRANSMIT ECM 2 OK 00'42 02/04 12:16 ' 9410891 0102 TRANSMIT ECM 2 OK 00'32 02/04 14:23 6264545226 5266 AUTO RX ECM 1 OK 00'34 02/05 14:51 3507676 0103 TRANSMIT ECM 3 OK O1'06 02/05 15:27 6264545226 5267 AUTO RX ECM 3 OK O1'10 02/05 16:47 5268 AUTO RX G3 0 NG 00'47 0 #005 02/06 10:14 5269 AUTO RX G3 0 NG 00'48 0 #005 02/12 13:27 5270 AUTO RX ECM 1 OK 00'34 02/13 12:43 559 5502 5271 AUTO RX ECM 2 OK 00'39 02/13 14:34 9099486998 5272 AUTO RX ECM 1 OK 00'43 02/13 16:09 18185595502 0104 TRANSMIT ECM 3 OK 00'56 Associated Engineers, Inc. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 3311 E.SHELBY STREET,ONTARIO,CA 91764-4872 (909)980-1982 FAX(909)941-0891 /00 FEB n U1 January 28, 2003 t`Crj F Fa \i? Lopmeo Mr. Scott Snyder 4. -• A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— Ayala Boring Claim. Dear Mr. Snyder: We have reviewed the material you forwarded to us from your subcontractor, Ayala Boring, in which they have responded to our assessment of their claim for extra charges in connection with the boring operations on the subject project. According to Ayala Boring's December 9, 2002 letter, "Ayala Boring's claim is based on the method of installation". Therefore, they are contending that our previous remarks regarding changed conditions do not apply. According to Ayala Boring, they bid the work in accordance with Specification Section 306-8.1.1, which required an "unmanned entry method". Further that, as a result of soil conditions, they had to "change" the method from an "unmanned entry method" to a hand mine installation. Given this basis, we have reviewed their claim against the contract documents and have the following observations. 1. Ayala's subcontract bid was part of AD General's bid and was based upon the site conditions at the time the bid was prepared. At no time prior to the bid did Ayala or AD General indicate that the work could not be performed in accordance with the plans and specifications. We have no record of a request for a clarification, additional information, or any exception to the bid from either Ayala Boring or AD General indicating that the work could not be performed as specified. Given . the lack of exceptions and Ayala's statement that they bid the plans and specifications, we can only conclude that Ayala and AD General had assured themselves that they were in a position to perform the work at the time of the bid. \\ASSOC-WIN2K\supportl9OB-NO\2001\01.064\Ayai Boring Letter-3AN 23,2003.doc PLANNING DESIGNING SURVEYING January 28,2003 Mr.Scott Snyder A.D.General Engineering Construction,Inc. Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— Ayala Boring Claim Page-2 Therefore, any circumstances that resulted in changes to means and methods could only have been discovered or occurred after the bid was submitted and accepted. 2. Given that no request or claim was submitted by Ayala Boring or AD General during the beginning weeks of the project, we have to conclude that the condition that prompted the change in construction methods had to have been discovered at the time the casing installation began. If the soil conditions were different than those observed at the time of bid, then we would have expected to receive a request for a change in construction methods before the work began. The casings were installed at the end of the project after the installation of thousands of feet of sewer pipeline. Ayala had ample opportunity to visit the site and observe the soil conditions at the depth of the casing installation before mobilizing on site. However, neither AD General who excavated the thousands of feet of trench, nor Ayala Boring, notified the City or the City's designated representative that the soils being encountered were different than those observed at the time of the bid. 3. Ayala states that they had to change the method of installation from an unmanned operation to a hand mining operation. If that is the case, Ayala was obligated, through AD General, to notify the City and the Engineer in writing before the change was made and get the anticipated extra cost associated with that change and the alternative construction method approved by the Engineer in writing before changing methods. These requirements are clearly stated in Section 3 — Changes in Work, of the Green Book. "3-1 CHANGES REQUESTED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 3-1.1 General. Changes in specific methods of construction may be made at the Contractor's request when approved in writing by the Engineer. Changes in the Plans and Specifications, requested in writing by the Contractor, which do not materially affect the work and which are not detrimental to the Work or to the interests of the Agency may be granted by the board to facilitate the Work, when approved in writing by the Engineer. 3-1.2 Payment for Changes Requested by the Contractor. If such changes are granted, they shall be made at a reduction in cost or at no additional cost to the Agency. Nothing herein shall be constructed as granting a right to the Contractor to demand acceptance of such changes." \\ASSOC-WIN2K\supportl\JOB-NO\2001\01-064\Ayal Boring Letter-JAN 28,2003.doc January 28,2003 Mr.Scott Snyder A.D.General Engineering Construction,Inc. Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— Ayala Boring Claim Page-3 According to Ayala, they made a unilateral decision to change the specified construction method without obtaining approval of the change or any costs associated with the change. Further, Section 3-1.2 states only changes that result in a reduction or no cost would be approved. Neither condition was apparently met since Ayala is now claiming additional costs for their change. 4. Finally, Ayala has included photographs of the rocks that they assert were removed from the casing, and although not explicitly stated, inferring that the rocks prompted the construction method change. We have examined the photographs and concluded that the rocks in the photographs are consistent with the rocks found in and around the surface of the project site, and consistent with the size and type of rocks found below ground during the full length of the project. The bid documents, and the specifications place the responsibility on AD General and Ayala to thoroughly investigate the site at the time of the bid. The Proposal for Construction of South Highland Avenue and Juniper Avenue Sewer System Improvements, Page P-1, Paragraph 2 states, "BIDDER declares that this proposal is based upon a careful examination of the work site, Plans, Specifications, Instructions to Bidder, and Contract Documents." Paragraph 4 states, "BIDDER certifies that it has visited the construction site ,and familiarized itself with local conditions under which the work is to be performed. Further, BIDDER certifies that it will be responsible for incorporating into it's bid whatever contingencies which are discernible by a reasonable investigation." Finally, the Contract Agreement for construction of South Highland Avenue and Juniper Avenue Sewer System Improvements, Bid No. SP-46-01, Article III, states, "CONTRACTOR agrees to receive and accept the prices set forth in the PROPOSAL BID SHEET(S) as full compensation for furnishing all materials, performing all work, and fulfilling all obligations hereunder. Said compensation shall cover all expenses, losses, damages, and consequences arising out of the nature of the work during its progress or prior to its acceptance including those for well and faithfully completing the work and the whole thereof in the manner and time specified in the aforesaid contact documents; and also including those arising from actions of the elements, unforeseen difficulties or obstructions encountered in the prosecution of the work, suspension of discontinuance of the work, and all other unknowns or risk of any description connected with the work." \\ASSOC-WIN2K\supportl\JOB-NO\2001\01-064\Ayal Boring Letter-lAN 28,2003.doc <. y January 28,2003 Mr.Scott Snyder A.D.General Engineering Construction,Inc. Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— Ayala Boring Claim Page-4 Submitting the bid and executing the agreement are evidence that the Contractor could construct the casings as specified unless there was a changed condition that could not be determined at the time of the bid. Based on our field observations and soils reports we continue to assert that the conditions encountered were consistent with the observable soil conditions and any provisions in the construction methods and means necessary to accomplish the work under those conditions were included in the bid. Since Contractor made the change in methods without approval by the City and we cannot concur that the soil conditions changed from those observable at the time of the bid the claim for additional compensation cannot be.recommended for approval to the City of Fontana. Yours truly, ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS INC. Thomas R. Holliman, PE Senior Project Manager cc: _ George Harvilla, PB-Fontana Ralph Roberts, A-E J.N. 01-064 \\ASSOC•WIN2K\supportl\JOB-NO\2001\01-064\Ayal Boring Letter-JAN 28,2003.doc Associated Engineers .. , 3311 E.SHELBY STREET ZQ (—c-3.\ J A N 2 fi,6!)-----1-"'"--"--------"'"- ---'"'"'" 229P:cjit:4 I7:::',.='..'::'':-.:.-1:::•:*.:' — '''''"----''..'"1:: . , Mn.. Geo,Lge HaAvilta. City o Fontana. 8353 Sima. Avenue Fontana, CA 92335 '7-v.:.1,17-.c*.-"S-VaSSS 11111t1III tili'l'illilidiEjljdfirlidElliiiiiiiiithilld 1 Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 January 21, 2003 Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction,Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— Ayala Boring Claim Dear Mr. Snyder: We have reviewed the material you forwarded to us from your subcontractor Ayala Boring in which they have responded to our assessment of their claim for extra charges in connection with the boring operations on the subject project. According to Ayala Boring's December 9, 2002 letter, "Ayala Boring's claim is based on the method of installation". Therefore they are contending that our previous remarks regarding changed conditions do not apply. According to Ayala Boring they bid the work in accordance with Specification Section 306-8.1.1, which required an "unmanned entry method". Further that as a result of soil conditions they had to "change" the method from an "unmanned entry method" to a hand mine installation. Given this basis we have reviewed their claim against the contract documents and have the following observations. 1. Ayala's subcontract bid was part of AD General's bid and was based upon the site conditions at the time the bid was prepared. At no time prior to the bid did Ayala or AD General indicate that the work could not be performed in accordance with the plans and specifications. We have no record of a request for a clarification, addendum, or any exception to the bid from either Ayala Boring or AD General indicating that the work could not be performed as specified. Given the lack of exceptions and Ayala's statement that they bid the plans and specifications, we can only conclude that Ayala and AD General had assured themselves that they were in a position to perform the work at the time of the bid. Therefore any C:\Documents and Settings\harvilla\Loral Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLIG\Ayal Boring Letter Second Response.doc changes to means and methods could only have occurred after the bid was submitted and accepted. 2. Given that no request or claim was submitted by Ayala Boring or AD General during the beginning weeks of the project we have to conclude that the condition that prompted the change in construction methods had to have been discovered at the time the casing installation began. If the soil conditions were different than those observed at the time of bid then we would have expected to receive a request for a change in construction methods before the work began. The casings were installed at the end of the project after the installation of thousands of feet of sewer pipeline. Ayala had ample opportunity to visit the site and observe the soil conditions at the depth of the casing installation before mobilizing on site. However, neither AD General who excavated the thousands of feet of trench, nor Ayala Boring, notified the City or the City's designated representative that the soils being encountered were different those observed at the time of the bid. 3. Ayala states that they had to change the method of installation from an unmanned operation to a hand mining operation. If that is the case, Ayala was obligated, through AD General, to notify the City and the Engineer in writing before the change was made and get the anticipated extra cost associated with that change and the alternative construction method approved by the Engineer in writing before changing methods. These requirements are clearly stated in Section 3 — Changes in Work, of the Green Book. "3-1 CHANGES REQUESTED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 3-1.1 General. Changes in specific methods of construction may be made at the Contractor's request when approved in writing by the Engineer. Changes in the Plans and Specifications, requested in writing by the Contractor, which do not materially affect the work and which are not detrimental to the Work or to the interests of the Agency may be granted by the board to facilitath the Work, when approved in writing by the Engineer. 3-1.2 Payment for Changes Requested by the Contractor. If such changes are granted, they shall be made at a reduction in cost or at no additional cost to the Agency. Nothing herein shall be constructed as granting a right to the Contractor to ,demand acceptance of such changes." According to Ayala they made a unilateral decision to change the specified construction method without obtaining approval of the change or any costs associated with the change. Further Section 3-1.2 states only changes that result in a reduction or no cost would be approved. Neither condition was apparently met since Ayala is now claiming additional costs for their change. C:\Documents and Settings\harvilla\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKS\Ayal Boring Letter Second Response.doc 4. Finally, Ayala has included-phvt_ographs of_the rocks-that they-assert were removed from theca ing. '4nd although not explicitly stated)inferring that tie rocks prompted the construction method change) We have e am ned theme Photo raPhs"andc onluded that the'rocl i the hoto grap h are consistent with the rocks found in and around the surface of the project site, and consistent with the size and type of rocks found below ground during the full length of the project. The bid documents, and the specifications place the responsibility on AD General and Ayala to thoroughly investigate the site at the time of the bid. The Proposal for Construction of South Highland Avenue and Juniper Avenue Sewer System Improvements,Page P-1, Paragraph 2 states, "BIDDER declares that this proposal is based upon a careful examination of he work site, Plans, Specifications, Instructions to Bidder, and Contract Documents." Paragraph 4 states, "BIDDER certifies that it has visited the construction site and familiarized itself with local conditions under which the work is to be performed. Further, BIDDER certifies that it will be responsible for incorporating into it's bid whatever contingencies which are discernible by a reasonable investigation." Finally, the Contract Agreement for construction of South Highland Avenue and Juniper Avenue Sewer System Improvements, Bid No. SP-46-01, Article III, states, "CONTRACTOR agrees to receive and accept the prices set forth in the PROPOSAL BID SHEET(S) as full compensation for furnishing all materials, performing all work, and fulfilling all obligations hereunder. Said compensation shall cover all expenses, losses, damages, and consequences arising out of the nature of the work during its progress or prior to its acceptance including those for well and faithfully completing the work and the whole thereof in the manner and time specified in the aforesaid contact documents; and also including those arising from actions of the elements, unforeseen difficulties or obstructions encountered in the prosecution of the work, suspension of discontinuance of the work, and all other unknowns or risk of any description connected with the work." Submitting the bid and executing the agreement are evidence that the Contractor could construct the casings as specified unless there was a changed condition that could not be determined at the time of the bid. Based on our field observations and soils reports we continue to assert that the conditions encountered were consistent with the observable soil conditions and any provisions in the C:\Documents and Settings\harvilla\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKS\Ayal Boring Letter Second Response.doc construction methods and means necessary to accomplish the work under those conditions were included in the bid. Since Contractor made the change in methods without approval by the City and we cannot concur that the soil conditions changed from those observable at the time of the bid the claim for additional compensation cannot be recommended for approval to the City of Fontana. Yours truly, ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS INC. Thomas R. Holliman,PE Senior Project Manager CC: George Harvilla, PB-Fontana Ralph Roberts, A-E C:\Documents and Settings\harvilla\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\0LK5\Ayal Boring Letter Second Response.doc - Harvilla, George From: Tom Holliman [tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 2:35 PM To: Harvilla, George; "Ralph Roberts" Subject: November 15, 2002 Ayal Boring Letter Second Resp... For your comments before finaling for mail out. Tom 1 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 2:06 PM To: 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.'; 'Carlos Navarro' Cc: • 'Tom Holliman' • Subject: RE: Point Repair Scott, Carla received the package and distributed the information to Carlos and me. I also faxed a copy of it to Tom Holliman., Carlos, I have read the information Scott sent. Let me know when you have reviewed this information so we can start on some type of repair quickly. George Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2002 10:41 AM To: George Harvilla Subject: Point Repair You should have received the submittal on Wednesday by 10:30am from Fed Express, did you. Rather Carla was the one addressed on the package per your request, did you receive it from her? Scott 1 FW: South Highland Sewer As-Builts Page 1 of 2 Ce Harvilla, George From: David Eames[deames@fontana.org] Sent: Wednesday,January 08, 2003 8:34 AM To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: South Highland Sewer As-Builts George, I got the CD! Thanks very much for your help. Dave Eames Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 8:35 AM To: 'deames@fontana.org' Subject: FW: South Highland Sewer As-Builts Hi David, I put the CD with the electronic as-builts on your chair last night. Did you get them? George Original Message From: Harvilla, George Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 9:53 AM To: Tom Holliman (torah@assoc-eng.com) Cc: 'deames@fontana.org' Subject: FW: South Highland Sewer As-Builts Tom, Can you please expedite the electronic as-builts to David Eames? Thank you. George Harvilla Original Message From: David Eames [mailto:deames@fontana.org] Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 7:24 AM To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: South Highland Sewer As-Builts George, No, I have not received anything from Associated. Your assistance would be appreciated greatly. Thank you, 1/8/2003 FW: South Highland Sewer As-Builts Page 2 of 2 Dave Eames Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 12:20 PM To: 'deames@fontana.org' Subject: FW: South Highland Sewer As-Builts David, Did you ever receive these? George Original Message From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:33 PM To: 'Tom Holliman' Cc: 'deames@fontana.org' Subject: South Highland Sewer As-Builts Tom, Thanks for the hard copy as-builts. The designer of the South Highland Widening Project needs the as builts electronically. Can you please e-mail sheets 7-10 to David Eames (deames@fontana.orq) ? Thanks, George 1/8/2003 Harvilla,George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 1:10 PM To: Scott Snyder(E-mail); Carlos Navarro (E-mail); Tom Holliman (E-mail) Subject: FW: LINK-PIPE Information Request Scott/Carlos/Tom, I got a response regarding my question (below) about the sewage flow getting over the "bump" at the end of the pipe repair. George Original Message From: lembit fmailto:Imaimets@Iinkpipe.comj Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 3:59 PM To: `master' Subject: RE: LINK-PIPE Information Request Dear Mr. Harvilla, Thanks for your interest. Yes our GROUTING SLEEVETM is suitable for this repair. Originally it was designed for the repair of"Griffen Pipe", a brittle lowfired clay pipe used in Florida from 1900 to 1939. Later we widened its use to all other pipes from concrete to asbestos cement to even cast iron. Your question about creating an obstruction is taken care of by several advantages this sleeve has: 1. As long as there is air above the entire length of the repaired pipe, the quantity of water entering the pipe equals the quantity leaving it. In this case the obstruction is not an issue. Most pipes are designed maximum 2/3 full and therefore this problem does not arise in most cases. Therefore the distrubance is only local. 2. If, however, the pipe happens to be overloaded already, the above is not a valid assessment. In this case the advantage of this sleeves is backed by two properties it has:The friction coefficient od stanless steel is a fraction of clay, or concrete. The other factor is its similiarity to a ventury. As in case of the Ventury, the pressure increase upstream forces the water through at higher velocity. Combined with improved friction coefficient of stainless steel, this again has mostly a low level local disturbance. 3. There is also an advantage as far as the change in the direction of flow lines around the end of the sleeve is concerned. Due to the directional change of flow lines at the ends of the sleeve, there is a gouging effect which keeps the area of the sleeve always clean.We have also placed a 10-year Limited Manufacturer Warranty on the sleeves if used in sanitary or storm sewers. This Warranty does not cover sewers containing industrial effluents and installation-related defects. The last because we do not have control over the installation. However if our installation instructions are followed, these sleeves are designed for a minimum 100-year service life. I will arrange the head-loss calculations so they can be e-mailed for your reference.The Sales Department has also mailed to you a general information package including a CD. Should you need assistance in starting to install, we have a very experienced instructor available. Please call me at 1-800-265-5696, or my cellular 1-416-827-2144 if I can be of further service. Regards, Lembit (Lem) Maimets, P.E. Link-Pipe Inc. Original Message IFrom: master Jmailto:master@linkpipe.comj Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 9:05 AM ITo: Lembit Maimets; Alar Karuks Subject: Fw: LINK-PIPE Information Request Original Message To: <info@linkpipe.com> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 5:05 PM Subject: LINK-PIPE Information Request Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by () on Friday, December 13, 2002 at 17:05:37 contact_name: George Harvilla company_name: City of Fontana, CA phone: 909-427-9166 fax: e_mail: harvilla@pbworld.com street: provinve_state: CA city: Fontana postal_code: country: USA grouting_sleeve: yes comments: We are considering the grouting sleeve for a crack in a 10" vitrified clay sewer pipe. THe pipe is on a 2.0%slope. My queston is: won't sewerage dam/build up when it hits the end of the sleeve? How much of a"bump" is there that the flow has to go over? FAX too YEARS PARSONS 685 East Carnegie Drive BRINCKERHOFF Suite 210 San Bernardino,CA 92408-3507 909-888-1106 Fax:909-889-1884 To: b m /�c l From: George Harvilla. Date: Project No.: Fax No.: / //_ 471 f No. of Pages (including this page): Subject: �P Comments: s". e J f7 ,.// '4"u vr� .-,j- H" c. !/ /V/ Over a Century of Engineering Excellence RESPONSE REQUESTED Harvilla, George From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 11:58 PM To: Harvilla, George Cc: TOM HOLLIMAN Subject: My Availability I will be on Jury Duty this week, 12/16-20/02. If you need to contact someone please call the office. Bryan is also an option but notify the office of any calls and purpose to Bryan.This is so we may assure proper attention to the call is made. Thank You. Scott A. Snyder HaMla,George From: Tom Holliman [torah@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 4:03 PM To: George Harvilla (E-mail) Subject: Fontana Sewer Point Repair/Asbuilt drawings George, The point repair method Scott is proposing looks fine if Carlos is okay with it. The asbuilts are being printed you should have them tomorrow. I tried to send them to you electronically but our email server is down. Thanks, Tom Associated Engineers, Inc. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 3311 E.SHELBY STREET,ONTARIO,CA 91764-4872 (909)980-1982 FAX(909)941-0891 December 4, 2002 Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— Project Completion Dear Mr. Snyder: As of this writing, there are only a few items left to complete and bring the subject project to a close. These consist principally of the repair of the broken sewer pipe and three outstanding claim items. It is our understanding that you are working to arrange for the broken pipe to be repaired. You and City staff reviewed the videotape showing the damaged pipe on November 13, 2002. At that time, you indicated that you were going to attempt a repair method that would not require the excavation of the street. Since that time, we have not received a definitive date when that work is going to be done. We need AD General to provide the City with an estimated date for the completion of the repairs. We have record of three claims that have been submitted to the City on this project. They include the claim for extra work for the Sierra Avenue and Highland Avenue borings by Ayala Boring, the extra cost for the irrigation pipe removal by AD General, and a claim for extra costs associated with the sequence for pouring the manhole structures by Olsen Precast. We have responded to all of these claims and would like to bring closure to them, along with the final punch list items of construction work. It has been our assessment that there was insufficient evidence to support the boring related claim, no evidence to support the assertion that AD General was directed to remove the irrigation pipe, and lastly the City was not obligated to provide you or Olsen Precast with any specific pouring sequencing. Since we assume that AD General would like to close out the project as well, we would like to have a claims resolution meeting with you and review the information you have for all three claims before December 13, 2002. This will allow us to process all of the O:VOB•NO\2001\01-064\Claims and job closeout letter 12_04_02.doc PLANNING DESIGNING SURVEYING December 4, 2002 Mr.Scott Snyder A.D.General Engineering Construction,Inc. s. Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— Project Completion Page-2 outstanding claims at one time and close out the project. If you would submit copies of the information we have requested in our previous response letters prior to that date, we can review it and be prepared to complete our discussions at the claim resolution meeting. As you may recall from the last meeting we had regarding change order items, we are fully prepared to honor the terms of the contract and the conditions of the Greenbook. All claims which qualify under the terms of the contract and the Greenbook will be recommended for approval. Please let us know when you will be making the repairs and when you are prepared to meet to discuss the outstanding claims. We ask that the meeting take place on or before December 13, 2002. Please let us know if you will be unable to meet before that time. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (909) 980-1982. Yours truly, ASSOCJATED ENGINEERS INC. • Thomas R. Holliman, PE Senior Project Manager CC: George Harvilla, PB-Fontana Ralph Roberts, A-E J.N.01-064 0:VOB•NO\2001\01.664\Calms and Job closeout letter 12-04_02.doc Associated Engineers, Inc. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 3311 E.SHELBY STREET ONTARIO,CA 91764-4872 (909)980-1982 FAX(909)941-0891 December 3, 2002 Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 • Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— Ayala Boring Claim, Revised Response Dear Mr. Snyder: This letter is being sent as a follow-up to my telephone call with your office this morning regarding the Ayala Boring claim. This letter supercedes our previous letter of November 25, 2002 for the purpose of addressing the specific items needed to consider this claim. We have reviewed the material you forwarded to us from your subcontractor - Ayala Boring, in which they have invoiced AD General in excess of $15,000 for extra work, in connection with the subject project. In order for us to address this claim, the contract documents require additional materials from you and/or Ayala Boring. It is our understanding that the invoice from Ayala Boring was based on their assertion that they experienced changed conditions on the project that necessitated extra work. According to the verbal reports and emails we received, Ayala Boring was claiming that the soil conditions were different than originally expected. And that those soil conditions prevented them from installing the casing, or at the least slowed their progress to the point that their original price was no longer valid. In order to determine if a changed condition existed under the terms of the contract we must have evidence to support that allegation. Please provide copies of soil analysis, photographs from within the casing showing rocks substantially larger than those removed during the excavation of the previous 4,500 feet of sewer main, photographs of the pieces of broken rock removed from the casing, or other physical evidence of the changed condition. This information is required to substantiate the claim there was a changed condition. In addition, you and/or Ayala Boring must provide a narrative explaining why the conditions encountered could not be determined in advance of the work. 0:\J0B-N01.2001\01-064\yal Boring Letter Supercede Version 12 3_02.doc PLANNING DESIGNING SURVEYING t { ♦ if December 3,2002 Mr.Scott Snyder A.D.General Engineering Construction,Inc. Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— Ayala Boring Claim,Revised Response Page-2 In addition to the evidence of the changed condition, we need a detailed breakdown from you of the materials, manpower, and equipment used in performing the extra work that would not have been originally involved in the work. The breakdown received with the claim consisted of daily extra work logs. But the bore was part of the original scope of work so only the incremental increased cost would qualify as an extra cost. In order to validate the extra work amounts, we need to review the original basis of the boring costs, the final total cost, and then we can determine the difference. The difference would be the amount of the claim. When we receive this package of information, we can process this claim. Since this has been an outstanding issue and we concur that we want to move quickly to complete all punch list items, we will expedite out review and response. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at(909) 980-1982. Yours truly, ASS ED ENGINE R INC. • Thomas R. Holliman, PE Senior Project Manager CC: George Harvilla, PB-Fontana Ralph Roberts, A-E J.N. 01-064 O: OB-NO\2001\01-064\Ayal Boring Letter Supercede Version 12r3_02.doc iv ,.,..-- Associated Engineers, Inc. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 3311 E.SHELBY STREET ONTARIO,CA 91764-4872 (909)980-1982 FAX(909)941-0891 ik November 25, 2002 Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements — Ayala Boring Claim Dear Mr. Snyder: We have reviewed the material you forwarded to us from your subcontractor Ayala Boring in which they have invoiced AD General in excess of $15,000 for extra work, in connection with the subject project. In order for us to address this as a claim, the contract documents require additional materials from you and/or Ayala Boring. It is our understanding that the invoice from Ayala Boring was based on their assertion that they experienced changed conditions on the project that necessitated extra work. Please keep in mind that there is no contract between Ayala Boring and the City of Fontana. Ayala Boring is a subcontractor to you and, therefore, is considered an employee of AD General, per the Greenbook. Therefore, the only claims that the City can consider are those from you. Thus far, we have not received a claim for extra work from AD General, only a copy of an invoice from your subcontractor. If you wish to press a formal claim for extra work, please include the following in your request letter. 1. A copy of the written notice that Ayala Boring provided via AD General to the City, indicating a changed condition which required extra work. Per the Greenbook, this letter was required when the changed condition was uncovered by AD General/Ayala and prior to performing the work under the changed conditions. 2. A copy of the judgment made by the Engineer in response to the letter in item .. agreeing to the changed condition. 0:\)OB•NO\2001\01-064WYal Boring l.etter,doc PLANNING DESIGNING SURVEYING November 25,2(x)2 Mr.Scott Snyder A.U.General Engineering Construction,Inc. Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— Ayala Boring Claim Page-2 3. Documentation to support the change order amount agreed to between the City and AD General for the extra work. There is no breakdown of.labor or equipment showing how the charges were determined. We have no record that the documentation required in items 1 thru 3 of the Greenbook was provided to the City. However, in spite of the lack of documentation, we will still consider a change order for changed conditions if AD General can provide evidence of the changed conditions. According to the verbal reports and emails we received, Ayala Boring was claiming that the soil conditions were different than originally expected. And that those soil conditions prevented them from installing the casing, or at the least slowed their progress to the point that their original price was no longer valid. If this is correct, please provide copies of soil analysis, photographs from within the casing showing rocks substantially larger than those removed during the excavation of the previous 4,500 feet of sewer main, photographs of the pieces of broken rock removed from the casing, or other physical evidence of the changed condition. This information is required to substantiate the claim there was a changed condition. • In addition to the evidence of the changed condition, we need a detailed breakdown from ' you of the materials, manpower, and equipment used in performing the extra work. All of this information must come under AD General letterhead signed by you. When we receive this package of information, we can determine if any additional compensation is due to AD General. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (909) 980-1982. Yours truly, ASSQCIA/TED E GINEERS INC. Thomas R. Holliman, PE Senior Project Manager CC: George Harvllla, PB-Fontana - Ralph Roberts, A-E J.N. 01-064 O:U00•NO\2001\01.06\Ayal Borinp tener.doc t. Associated Engineers, Inc. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 3311 E.SHELBY STREET,ONTARIO,CA 91764-4872 (909)980-1982 FAX(909)941-0891 November 25, 2002 Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— Olsen Precast Claim Dear Mr. Snyder: We are in receipt of your letter dated November 13, 2002, requesting $1,035.00 for extra work in connection with the construction of manholes by your subcontractor Olsen Precast. We have reviewed the plans and specifications and can find.nothing which indicates that you were required to pour the manholes three at a time, or that the City guaranteed that you would be able to construct the manholes in that manner. From the invoices you attached to your change order request, it appears that your agreement with Olsen Precast was based on their ability to pour the manholes three at a time. Evidently they were unable to do so and they charged you for not being able to construct the manholes per your agreement. In order to process this claim we need the following items. 1. A complete description of the events which lead to this changed condition. Your letter was the first notice we have received that there was a changed condition that, per the contract with the City, entitled AD General to additional compensation. Per the contract, you were required to inform the City prior to the extra work, not after the work was complete. The "Telephone Line Conflict" is an inadequate description of the circumstances that prompted the extra work. 2. An indication of where in the plans and specifications you were told that the concrete manholes had to be constructed three at a time, or where you were informed that you would be guaranteed that ability. \\ASSOC-WIN2K\supportl\JOB-NO\2001\01.064\Olsen Precast Letter-Nov 25,2002.da PLANNING DESIGNING SURVEYING November 25,2002 Mr.Scott Snyder A.D.General Engineering Construction,Inc. Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— Olsen Precast Claim Page-2 3. A revised claim amount. According to the attached invoices, you were charged $450.00 on Olson Precast Invoice No. 2995 for two (2) two at a time pours at $225.00 each, and two (2) one time pours on Olson Precast Invoice No. 3142 for a total amount of $450.00. The total of those two charges is $900.00, not the $950.00 stated in your claim. Please keep in mind that there is no contract between Olsen Precast and the City of Fontana. Therefore, the City is not obligated to assure that AD General can meet the conditions of that subcontract. In order for the subcontractor claim to be paid by the City, AD General must explain how the extra work qualifies under the terms of the contract between AD General and the City of Fontana. When we receive this package of information, we can determine if any additional compensation is due to AD General. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (909) 980-1982. Yours truly, ASSOCIA ED ENGINEERS, INC. L. Thomas R. Holliman, PE Senior Project Manager cc: Greorge7Har_vi11a, PB-Fontana Ralph Roberts, A-E JN 01-064 \\AS;OC-WIN2K\supp-4t1V00-NO\2001\01.064\Olsen Precast Letter-Nov 25,2002.doc Sewer Notice of Completion Page 1 of 3 Harvilla, George From: Tom Holliman [tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 4:45 To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: Sewer Notice of Completion Hi George, I thought that if Scott can manage to produce any evidence that there might more changes than just the overtime and soils backcharges. I don't want to process a change order now, then find out in a couple of week we have to do another one. However, if you would like to settle everything we can right and make the circle close a little more on the end of the job, then I'll prepare the change order tomorrow and send it to you by Monday next. Tom Holliman Associated Engineers Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 4:31 PM To: Tom Holliman Subject: RE: Sewer Notice of Completion Tom, Why not do Item 4 before the deadline? How do the failed tests factor into this? I don't object to your letter explaining the Stop Notice situation. George Original Message From: Tom Holliman [mailto:tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 9:36 AM To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: Sewer Notice of Completion Thanks George, It appears we need to follow the steps below. 1. Wait until Scott completes the broken pipe repairs. 2. Prepare the next progress payment for the remainder of the striping work. (This completes all work items and punch list item). 3. After the pipe is repaired, notify Scott in writing that the work is complete and we're going to Council to final job, giving him a deadline for submitting any legititmate claims. 4-4,, e deadline passes, prepare a final change order for the deducts for the overtime inspection andfailed compaction tests. Send it to Scott(who will probably not sign it), but it's not required that he sign the change`` And i not uncommon for backchar es. This com lete the contract accounting part. 5. Notify Scot we're witholding the Stop Notice amount to Olsen Precast from any progress payments and the retention, and the date we're asking the Council to approve the Notice of Completion/Acceptance. Hopefully he will then resolve his dispute with Olsen, if not we will have to pay Olsen Precast the amount of the Stop Notice, 11/26/2002 Sewer Notice of Completion Page 2 of 3 J obtain their release, and the job will be over. I have never had to actually pay on a Stop Notice so I'll have to review how this his handled. I'll get back to you on it. I think I should write a letter to Scott explaining to him how the Stop Notice affects his payments, I'm not sure he understands that we will have to pay Olsen Precast unless he settles with them and provides us with a signed release. Do you agree? Tom H. Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 9:09 AM To: Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com) Subject: FW: Sewer Notice of Completion Tom, According to Yousuf (below),we need to finalize all the claims and punch list items before asking the Council to authorize filing the Notice of Completion. George Original Message From: Ray Bragg [mailto:rbragg@fontana.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:01 AM To: Harvilla, George Subject: FW: Sewer Notice of Completion George: We should not let the contractor off the hook until the cracked pipe is resolved. Ray Original Message From: Yousuf Patanwala Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 7:43 AM To: 'Harvilla, George' Cc: Ray Bragg; Carla Pursel; Ricardo Sandoval Subject: RE: Sewer Notice of Completion George yes the project has to be presented to City council for final acceptance and City council authorizes filing of Notice of completion on the project. Prior to scheduling the project to City Council for Final Acceptance, the contractor should be 100%complete with all the work including punch list items, project accounting should be final on both sides with final numbers for total contract construction cost and there should be no Stop Notices or pending claims of any sort on the project. [Yousuf Patanwala] Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 4:17 PM To: Yousuf Patanwala (ypatanwala@fontana.org) Cc: 'Carla Pursel'; 'Tom Holliman' Subject: Sewer Notice of Completion Yousuf, 11/26/2002 Sewer Notice of Completion Page 3 of 3 Tom Holliman, the Construction Manager of the South Highland Sewer, believes it's time to issue the Notice of Completion. Can this letter be signed by him, or is some kind of City Council Action required for the Notice of Completion/City Acceptance? Thanks, George 11/26/2002 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:34 PM To: 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.' Subject: - RE: Point Repair on Sewer Main Scott, When you are ready to submit your proposed solution, please make two copies (one for Carlos and one for me) and mail/fax/FedEx the package to Carla Pursel at City Hall, and she will get the copies to Carlos and me. Thanks, George Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 2:58 PM To: Harvilla@pbworld.com Subject: RE: Point Repair on Sewer Main OK, thank you. Now at the meeting you said to give it to you is this still what you want? On Mon, 25 Nov 2002 14:55:12 -0800 (PST) , "Harvilla, George" wrote: > Scott, > I will do everything I can to expedite the review process. > George > Original Message > From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. > [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 2:31 PM > To: Harvilla, George > Subject: RE: Point Repair on Sewer Main > George, > I want to have the work done by then as well and will do what I can to > make it happen. It seems many people are off this week making this > week a loss towards anything happening. Will their be , > a lenghty review or can I give to you and Carlos and get something > back in writing quick? I dont know how much you want to > involve Associated if at all since that makes more people taking > "time" to look at it. > For your info this repair will only take an hour more or less, that > all. > On Mon, 25 Nov 2002 14:21:23 -0800 (PST) , "Harvilla, George" 1 ` > wrote: > > > > > > Scott, > > > > I think we all would like to see this job closed out. I would > > personally like to see the repairs complete by mid-December, before > > the Christmas > > holiday period starts to approach. Fontana City staff is off > > from Dec. 24- > > Jan. 1. > > > > After finding a suitable repair option and receiving the City's > > approval, > > please expedite the repairs. > > > > Thank you. > > > > George > > > > > > Original Message > > From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. > > [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] > > > > Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 1:48 PM > > To: Harvilla, George > > Subject: Point Repair on Sewer Main > > > > I' found a few other products which I'm looking into. I do not > > believe I will have anything difinate for your review untill after > > the holiday. Would you update Carlos please. 2 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 4:11 PM To: 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.' Subject: FW: Extra Claims FYI Original Message From: Tom Holliman [mailto:tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 4:07 PM To: 'Harvilla, George' Subject: RE: Extra Claims Will do. Tom Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:57 PM To: 'Tom Holliman' Cc: 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. ' Subject: RE: Extra Claims Tom, Please fax copies of the letters to Scott (today if possible) , tomorrowat the latest. Thanks, George Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 2:54 PM To: George Harvilla Subject: Extra Claims Just heard from Tom of Assoc. about the boring claim. He said you have reviewed it and it will be mailed today. Is that the case? Ayala is becoming nasty now, so I want get them this asap. Tom also said my claim regarding M.H. 's extra cost's has been reviewed by you and should be mailed today. This is a claim for having additional trips/pour's for the M.H. 's due from the telephone conduit interference. I get the feeling this was denied from the way Tom was so matter of fact and vague. So George will you just please tell me what the answer is? The mail wont come before the Holiday Weekend and I don't want it on my mind the entire time. I would appreciate it very much. Today would be nice. 1 Harvilla, George From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 5:271 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: none I understand this and I know for the irrigation line I have no written direction stating to remove the line. I know this means I have nothing to support this claim so probably I will move on concerning that issue. Unfortunately it was a expensive mistake by Bryan. But so you know why it was high in price let me explain what I did and why. I came in high like everyone does waiting for you to come in low like all Agencies do. Then we meet in the middle some where. Also during negeociations I was going to mention things like that asphalt walkway on Walnut I graded and repaved, the tele delay, etc. I would have said lets save every some paper work and just pay me a bit for those good faith things I did under the irrigation line work, instead of having several claims. The City see's only one claim which looks really good for you and Assoc. This is how 99% of the other people want to do Claims/C.O. 's That's where I was coming from with that claim. The other things I would have settled for a token amount just like I said. But now that changes. For them I do have my documentation. And so you know George I fully expect everyone getting rejected. That's when I take it to the City people themselves. I know I am not bound by Associated or your deceision should I believe it unfair to me. It's not uncommon. Ya they'll grand stand and claim no responsibilty but I know better and go higher up. See there's always someone higher to go to in Agencies but it never goes higher than myself. I fully intend to do just that since I know these other claims I have back up and I am also intitled to compensation. I seriously doubt your employeer and Associated havent any claims for extra with the city. On Mon, 25 Nov 2002 16:30:36 -0800 (PST) , "Harvilla, George" wrote: > Scott, > I must continue to refer to Associated Engineers' e-mails and letters > to A.D. General in which they requested some sort of written > documentation from > you to support your position. > George > Original Message > From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. > [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] > Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 1:06 PM > To: George Harvilla > Subject: none > George, > Please excuse me for becoming personal regarding the irrigation line. > I can only go off what Bryan had told me and since nothing was in 1 > writing I have nothing to support my/his claim. It put me in an > awkward position in that I didn't want to disbelieve you but I also > had to believe Bryan. If you were I what would you do? > Tough question, at least it was for me. > Bryan has talked with Ralph since the claim and he got the impression > that the claim was rejected due to the amount being high. I spoke with > Tom about this and I' ll tell you what I told him. > I use to turn in the exact amount of my claim the first time. But > never would an Agency pay a first proposal they always counter and > refuse to pay the first submitted amount. I can only assume this is > because they expect contractors to inflate this amount so > the Agency counters with a under valued amount. Then settle some place > in between. > That is what I did for the irrigation claim. I know it's way high > and never expected to receive that amount. And when it was rejected > outright I was stunned. I had sent E-mails concerning my > claim and stating I was waiting on invoices from venders. I never > got any response back from Associated that I had no claim. I got no > response at all. That's been typical but when it was rejected outright > and no response to my original notices made me angry. > Why was I not given a reply to my original notices infoLining me of > this stance? That I is not right and I took it out on you some. > You have heard repeatedly that I haven't followed specifications but I > showed you that I have made notification per spec but I have not > received the proper response back. Where does that leave > me? You read that the Engr is to immediately investigate the claim and > give written response back to me. That was not done and > now at the end of the job I get a flat out denial on things. I really > am unsure what to do about this George. And I am sorry for > making it a personal matter I just got very angry with the whole > thing. 2 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 9:30 AM To: Carlos Navarro (cnavarro@fontana.org) Cc: Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com); 'Ralph Roberts'; Ralph Roberts at Home (coralph@earthlink.net); 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.' Subject: ,.FW: Copy of Daily's Importance: High Carlos, Can you please fax or e-mail the daily reports to Scott Snyder so he can begin looking at them? His fax number is: 818-559-5502. His phone no is: 818-559-7383. His e-mail address is above. Thanks, George Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 8:49 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: Copy of Daily's I want to receive the copy of the video's and daily's via mail but I wanted to know if you could E-mail me the daily reports Monday morning? I want to look them over and such and with the holiday coming up this week I doubt if the mail will get them here this week. Please let me know. 1 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 9:38 AM To: 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.' Cc: Carlos Navarro(cnavarro@fontana.org); 'Tom Holliman'; 'Ralph Roberts'; Ralph Roberts at Home (coralph@earthlink.net) Subject: RE: Point Repair on Sewer Main Scott, I think we all would like to see this job closed out. I would personally like to see the repairs complete by mid-December, before the Christmas holiday period starts to approach. Fontana City staff is off from Dec. 24- Jan. 1. After finding a suitable repair option and receiving the City's approval, please expedite the repairs. Thank you. George Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 1:48 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: Point Repair on Sewer Main I found a few other products which I'm looking into. I do not believe I will have anything difinate for your review untill after the holiday. Would you update Carlos please. 1 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George - Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 9:30 AM To: Carlos Navarro (cnavarro@fontana.org) Cc: Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com); 'Ralph Roberts'; Ralph Roberts at Home (coralph@earthlink.net); 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.' Subject: FW: Copy of Daily's Importance: High Carlos, Can you please fax or e-mail the daily reports to Scott Snyder so he can begin looking at them? His fax number is: 818-559-5502. His phone no is: 818-559-7383. His e-mail address is above. Thanks, George Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 8:49 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: Copy of Daily's I want to receive the copy of the video's and daily's via mail but I wanted to know if you could E-mail me the daily reports Monday morning? I want to look them over and such and with the holiday coming up this week I doubt if the mail will get them here this week. Please let me know. 1 Harvilla, George From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 12:34 PM To: TOM HOLLIMAN Cc: Harvilla, George Subject: Boring Claim-Your Reply? Do you have your official response for the boring claim ready to send to me? It's been over a month since I resubmitted this claim to you, and Ayala or I may have comments to your response. In order to close out this project sometime soon issues like this need to be addressed. Please let me know when I may expect your reply. Thank You. 1 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 2:55 PM To: 'Tom Holliman' Cc: 'Ralph Roberts'; Ralph Roberts at Home (coralph@earthlink.net) Subject: RE: Response letters to AD General Tom, The letters look good. On the Ayala letter, 4th paragraph, 3rd sentence, please change the word "we" to "were" . I never received a copy of Scott's letter dated Nov. 13 requesting $1,035. Please furnish a copy to me. Regarding Olson's stop notice for $19K, I guess there's no reason not to inform Scott we have received this notice, but I'll leave it up to you. George Original Message From: Tom Holliman [mailto:tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 11:05 AM To: George Harvilla (E-mail) Cc: "Ralph Roberts" Subject: Response letters to AD General Here are the final (finally) response letters to the claim recieved for the boring and the manholes. Please review and edit as appropriate and send them back and I'll send them to Scott. I expect more of these in the new couple of weeks while we're waitnig for the repair to be made. I think AD General is getting all of their bills and payments together and realizing they're not sitting so well. Regarding the stop notice from Olsen Precast for $19K+, do you want me to write a letter officially informing Scott that we are witholding that amount from his retention and progress payments? Tom Holliman Associated Engineers, Inc. 1 November 19, 2002 Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 , Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements—Ayala Boring claim Dear Mr. Snyder We have reviewed the material you forwarded to us from your subcontractor Ayala Boring in which they have invoiced AD General in excess of$15,000, for extra work in connection with the subject project. In order for us to address this as a claim the contract documents require additional materials from you and/or Ayala Boring. It is our understanding that the invoice from Ayala Boring was based on their assertion that they experienced changed conditions on the project that necessitated extra work. Please keep in mind that there is no contract between Ayala Boring and the City of Fontana. Ayala Boring is a subcontractor to you and therefore is considered an employee of AD General per the Greenbook. Therefore the only claims that the City can consider are those from you. Thus far we have not received a claim for extra work from AD General, only a copy of an invoice from your employee. If you wish to press a formal claim for extra work please include the following in your request letter. 1. A copy of the written notice that Ayala Boring provided via AD General to the City indicating a changed condition which required extra work. Per the Greenbook this letter was required when the changed condition was uncovered by AD General/Ayala and prior to performing the work under the changed conditions. 2. A copy of the judgment made by the Engineer in response to the letter in item agreeing to the changed condition. 3. Documentation to support the change order amount agreed to between the City and AD General for the extra work. We have no record that the documentation required in items 1 thru 3 of the Greenbook was provided to the City. However,in spite of the lack of documentation, we will still consider a change order for changed conditions if AD General can provide evidence of the changed conditions. According to the verb, reports and emails we received Ayala Boring was claiming that the soil conditions( ifferent that originally expected. And that those soil conditions prevented them from installing the casing, or at the least slowed their progress to the point that their original price was no longer valid. If this is correct please provide copies of soil analysis, photographs from within the casing showing rocks substantially larger than those removed during the excavation of the previous 4,500 feet of sewer main, photographs of the pieces of broken rock removed from the casing, or other physical evidence of the changed condition. This information is required to substantiate the claim there was a changed condition. In addition to the evidence of the changed condition we need a detailed breakdown from you of the materials, manpower, and equipment used in performing the extra work. All of this information must come under AD General letterhead signed by you. When we receive this package of information we can determine if any additional compensation is due to AD General. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (909) 980-1982. Yours truly, Thomas R. Holliman,PE Senior Project Manager CC: George Harvilla, PB-Fontana Ralph Roberts, A-E r November 19, 2002 Mr..Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements—Olsen Precast Claim Dear Mr. Snyder /-'4 We are in receipt of your letter dated November 13, 2002, requesting$1,035.00 for extra work in connection with the construction of manholes by your subcontractor Olsen Precast. We have reviewed the plans and specifications and can find nothing which indicates that you were required to pour the manholes three at a time, or that the City guaranteed that you would be able to construct the manholes in that manner. From the invoices you attached to your change order request it appears that your agreement with Olsen Precast was based on their ability to pour the manholes three at a time. Evidently they were unable to do so and they charged you for not being able to construct the manholes per your agreement. In order to process this claim we need the following items. 1. A complete description of the events which lead to this changed condition. Your letter was the first notice we have received that there was a changed condition that, per the contract with the City, entitled AD General to additional compensation. Per the contract you were required to inform the City prior to the extra work,not after the work was complete. The "Telephone Line Conflict" is an inadequate description of the circumstances that prompted the extra work. 2. An indication of where in the plans and specifications you were told that the concrete manholes had to be constructed three at a time, or where you were informed that you would be guaranteed that ability. 3. A revised claim amount. According to the attached invoices you were charged $450.00 on Olson Precast Invoice No. 2995 for two (2) two at a time pours at $225.00 each, and two (2) one time pours on Olson Precast Invoice No. 3142 for a total amount of$450.00. The total of those two charges is $900.00, not the $950.00 stated in your claim. Please keep in mind that there is no contract between Olsen Precast and the City of Fontana. Therefore the City is not obligated to assure that AD General can meet the conditions of that subcontract. In order for the subcontractor claim to be paid by the City, AD General must explain how the extra work qualifies under the terms of the contract between AD General and the City of Fontana. When we receive this package of information we can determine if any additional compensation is due to AD General. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (909) 980-1982. Yours truly, Thomas R. Holliman, PE Senior Project Manager CC: George Harvilla,PB-Fontana Ralph Roberts, A-E -- • Harvilla, George From: Tom Holliman [tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 10:16 AM To: 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.' Cc: "Ralph Roberts"; George Harvilla(E-mail) Subject: RE:Job Claim - Fontana, S. Highland Sewer Scott, Regarding the irrigation line issue. I appreciate your appeal to logic, but unfortunately I can't recommend a change order without some "evidence" that the instructions were given. Let me say again, the contract documents, which both AD General and the City, are bound to have specific conditions which must be met in order to approve a change order. Associated didn't write those conditions, they're part of the Greenbook and the City's standard specifications. If I had the latitude to make the call on the basis of logic things would be different, but per the contract I need some kind of documentation, job log, inspector report, etc. substantiating your story I could process that through the City. Then we would review the cost breakdown, determine if all of the stated hours and equipment were used, verify the costs, and pass that along to the City as a cost of doing the job. But your crews did the work and I don't know why they did what they did. You say they were directed, but neither Ralph Roberts, nor George Harvilla will back that assertion. The inspection reports don't contain any reference to direction by the City or it's representatives. And so far I haven't gotten anything from you except your ongoing appeal to "believe" that Bryan is telling the truth and Ralph Roberts and George Harvilla are lying. In your email you say, "And Frankly I have a lot to support my case, such as excellent documentation for legitimate claims, all per the letter of the spec's. And the huge bomb that none were responded to, none, ever! " That's all I have ever asked you for when you asked about extras, give me the documentation. And we have responded repeatedly to your claims with the exact same statement, show us how your claim qualifies as an extra, per the terms of the contract, and we'll send it to the City for processing. All the conversations and emails become quickly irrelevant in the face of that documentation. So please send it and let's move on these items. There's no need for more phone calls on this matter, please just send me the documentation you have and we can get this issue wrapped up. I would like to help you close out this job but you have to give me the things I need to do that for you and the City. Tom Holliman Associated Engineers, Inc. Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 3 :36 AM To: TOM HOLLIMAN Subject: Job Claim - Fontana, S. Highland Sewer Tom, About the irrigation line ask yourself this question. Why skip over every other thing out there, even little 1" copper water service lines but not this?? It makes no sense. Bryan called me right away, told me what he dug up and asked what to do. He knew the 1 Excavator alone cost me over $1,400 a day. He said Ralph was calling to find out if this was the pipe the Water Dept said they didn't know where it was. I instructed Bryan to inform Ralph we were on delay/stand-by awaiting direction. As soon as Bryan did this Ralph called George, {you weren't available) , and told George what we dug up and Bryan notified him we were on stand-by waiting for direction. This was when Bryan was given direction to remove the pipe via Ralph from George. Like I said why remove this pipe but skip over everything else.? To Ralph's credit he did his job correctly and only repeated to Bryan what he was told to say. More to think on. Why was nothing said at the time? Or anything said to the contrary to my written notice sent the same day or the follow up's, they stated why the line was removed? I'll tell you why. Because we were told to remove it. And that's the only reason no delay claim was made. Tom your an intelligent man I've seen that. For that reason I got to believe you know what I've said is what took place. Also consider what I said to you about Ayala's claim, I did that knowing they probably will file suit against me. And despite the fact if he get's more money I do to. A dishonest person does things totally different from how I have. I was going to forget my other claims once this was approved but I can't now. I don't want to but if I have to go to court I will, I can't afford not to. And Frankly I have a lot to support my case, such as excellent documentation for legitimate claims, all per the letter of the spec's. And the huge bomb that none were responded to, none, ever! Call me please Tom, I want to speak with you personally. I need to talk about things not yet mentioned and I don't want to do it by E-mail. 818-395-9700. Call late afternoon I'll be asleep this morning from being out till 5am on my Commerce job. 2 Harvilla, George From: Tom Holliman [tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:24 AM To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE:Job Claim - Fontana, S. Highland Sewer Hi George, I didn't think so but I thought I would ask first before responding to Scott. I'll make sure that you get copied on my email response. I will also be sending you the final (finally) version of the Ayala response, plus the new one I just got from Scott for Olsen Precast charges. Tom Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:09 AM To: 'Tom Holliman ' Subject: RE: Job Claim - Fontana, S. Highland Sewer No, I don't have anything else. Original Message From: Tom Holliman To: Harvilla, George Cc: "Ralph Roberts" Sent: 11/20/02 10:41 AM Subject: FW: Job Claim - Fontana, S. Highland Sewer George, FYI Looks like I get the personal touch now. I'm curious about Scott's excellent documentation. About the only thing he has is a series of emails telling us he's got a claim. Did you get any other documentation? If so I'd like to see it before I respond. Tom H. Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 3:36 AM To: TOM HOLLIMAN Subject: Job Claim - Fontana, S. Highland Sewer Tom, About the irrigation line ask yourself this question. Why skip over every other thing out there, even little 1" copper water service lines but not this?? It makes no sense. 1 Bryan called me right away, told me what he dug up and asked what to do. He knew the Excavator alone cost me over $1,400 a day. He said Ralph was calling to find out if this was the pipe the Water Dept said they didn't know where it was. I instructed Bryan to inform Ralph we were on delay/stand-by awaiting direction. As soon as Bryan did this Ralph called George, {you weren't available) , and told George what we dug up and Bryan notified him we were on stand-by waiting for direction. This was when Bryan was given direction to remove the pipe via Ralph from George. Like I said why remove this pipe but skip over everything else. ? To Ralph's credit he did his job correctly and only repeated to Bryan what he was told to say. More to think on. Why was nothing said at the time? Or anything said to the contrary to my written notice sent the same day or the follow up's, they stated why the line was removed? I'll tell you why. Because we were told to remove it. And that's the only reason no delay claim was made. Tom your an intelligent man I've seen that. For that reason I got to believe you know what I've said is what took place. Also consider what I said to you about Ayala's claim, I did that knowing they probably will file suit against me. And despite the fact if he get's more money I do to. A dishonest person does things totally different from how I have. I was going to forget my other claims once this was approved but I can't now. I don't want to but if I have to go to court I will, I can't afford not to. And Frankly I have a lot to support my case, such as excellent documentation for legitimate claims, all per the letter of the spec's. And the huge bomb that none were responded to, none, ever! Call me please Tom, I want to speak with you personally. I need to talk about things not yet mentioned and I don't want to do it by E-mail. 818-395-9700. Call late afternoon I'll be asleep this morning from being out till 5am on my Commerce job. 2 Page 1of1 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 1:46 To: 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.' Cc: 'Tom Holliman' Subject: FW: Importance: High FYI Original Message From: Carlos Navarro [mailto:cnavarro@fontana.org] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 1:00 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: Importance: High George,the copies of the daily reports have been make,waiting on the video tape copies to get back to us. When I get them back. I'll have our secretary mail everything out. Carlos Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 12:20 PM To: 'Carlos Navarro' Cc: 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.' Subject: Carlos, How are the copies of the video and dailies coming? George 11/21/2002 Harvilla, George From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 12:31 AM To: Harvilla, George Cc: TOM HOLLIMAN Subject: Point Repair-S. Highland Sewer, Fontana Writing to give you an update. I found a Manufacturer in Florida that has a cast in place method for point repairs. Will have more information for you in a few more days. My initial thoughts are good and if I like the product I will make up a submittal for your review. 1 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 4:48 PM To: Tom Holliman (E-mail) Subject: FW: boring claim? Tom, what is the status of this? �� �� " 6` r v Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 4:02 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: boring claim? George, Back on Oct 18th at the meeting we had at Assoc office I turned in the claim for extra on the boring. Since then I have requested the response at least five times. But as with most everything else I never heard back. I need you to intervene in this and get me a official reply. • iarvil1a, George From: Tom Holliman [tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:45 AM To: 'Harvilla, George' Subject: RE: boring claim? George, I will bring the reply to the lunch meeting so we can discuss it before I mail it to Scott. Just a few points for the record. 1. We have never recieved a "claim" for an extra from AD General for extra costs for boring. Scott handed us a copy of an invoice he recieved from his subcontractor Ayala Boring for alledged extras for the boring subcontract. As such there is no current "claim" being processed at this time. I agreed to provide Scott a letter stating why the claim could not be processed so he pass that information along to Ayala. That research and preparation is taking more time than I thought but is now complete. 2. I had recieved two emails requesting an update on the "boring claim" , not "at least five times" . 3. As we've discussed on several occasions, and we have informed Scott, a claim requires several things to be approved, per the contract. a. A written notice from the Contractor indicating a changed condition before the work is performed that will be impacted by the changed condition. This was not done. Per Section 3-4, Changed Conditions, Greenbook. b. A written judgement by the Engineer that the examined condition is a changed condition. Couldn't be done because it was never requested. Per Section 3-4, Changed Conditions, Greenbook. c. A change order amount for extra money and time before the extra work is performed. This couldn't be done because the request was made after the extra work was done. Per Section 3-4, Changed Conditions, Greenbook. d. An explanation from the Contractor (AD General) as to why this changed condition could not be ascertained from the pre-bid inspection, or all of the excavation they did up to the jacking and boring pits. This was never done. e. Evidence that a changed condition actually existed. Ayala alledged they hit big rocks that stopped the auger from moving forward forcing them to hand dig the tunnel, this caused delays and extra costs. To date we have recieved nothing to indicate this was the case, no pictures, no pieces of big rock, nothing but Scott's statement and Ayala's statement that they hit soil conditions that kept them from installing the casing. Of course they did actually install the casing so unless they sent a man into the casing with a jack hammer to blast out the rock (no pieces of broken rock of course was ever shown to the inspector)how did they get the casing in? f. As part of any claim the Contractor must provide backup information to support his charges including material invoices, certified payroll for overtime paid if it was required, equipment logs showing the hours and cost of equipment used in the extra work. In short how they came up with their extra cost. Neither AD General or their subcontractor provided this basic information. They simply provided an invoice for the extra charges. Ayala sent AD General a bill for over $15,000, did Scott ever ask them how they came up with that number? What was their original bid to him? How much of their extra work was actually due to the fact that they prosecuted the work improperly as evidenced by the deviation from the plan alignment and grade and the requirement to rework manhole number 11 to make the pipe fit with the section in the casing? So far all AD General has done is forward a letter to us from thier "employee" per Section 2-3 .3 State of Subcontractors, Greenbook, and asked us to respond to it. Given the current posture of AD General (i.e. statements that they are considering legal action) , I believe the appropriate response is to notfy AD General that no "claim" exists and that as soon as they send one that conforms to the requirements of the contract we can respond to it. Let's discuss this at the noon meeting. Cr C IC..,_ Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 4:48 PM To: Tom Holliman (E-mail) Subject: FW: boring claim? Tom, what is the status of this? Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 4:02 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: boring claim? George, Back on Oct 18th at the meeting we had at Assoc office I turned in the claim for extra on the boring. Since then I have requested the response at least five times. But as with most everything else I never heard back. I need you to intervene in this and get me a official reply. 2 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 5:04 PM • To: Ralph Roberts (E-mail); Ralph Roberts at Home (E-mail) Cc: Tom Holliman (E-mail) Subject: FW: The Broken MH's Ralph, what is the status of this? Geroge Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 4:24 PM To: George Harvilla Subject: The Broken MH's Will you please speak with Ralph and ask him to get me the information he has regarding the Broken M.H. bases. This is a serious matter going on. Our bill to Olson Precast is over ten thousand dollars. They caused an additional two weeks rental on traffic control devices, shields, braces, everything out there. You read my earlier E-mail and how they are fabricating a bill to us. And they claim to be filing a stop notice over this. I have told you all about this as soon as we were told by Olson. This being the case along with what Ralph told me last week that he reported in his daily's there should be no reason for my retention money or any payments being held. Please provide the things asked for as soon as possible. p �cv /o. /I e- 5-„oi rt., 5 • es-) A . • (.01-16, // /.; y f�� sc /.? GH 6cv-re 7171— 4 r °may , fie v: Ge0 . S, f,2S 7(L r-rc(C S,/^ . ?U /'r lJec/c 1 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 9:13 AM To: Tom Holliman (tomh@assoc-eng.com); 'Ralph Roberts; Ralph Roberts at Home (coralph@earthlink.net); 'Carlos Navarro' Cc: 'Ray Bragg'; Carla Purse! (cpursel@fontana.org) Subject: FW: Video of South Highland Sewer FYI Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 7:28 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: Re: Video of South Highland Sewer I agree with this and understand it. Scott A. Snyder On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 19:27:01 -0800 (PST) , "Harvilla, George" wrote: Video of South Highland Sewer Scott, At a meeting today attended by you, Carlos Navarro, Tom Holliman, Ralph Roberts, Garret Richardson, and me, at which the video of the pipe cracks was played, the consensus of all attendees was that the cracks warranted repair or pipe replacement. After determining whether you are going to repair or replace the pipe, please contact Carlos and me for final approval before commencing on the repairs. Thank you. George Harvilla Consultant Project Manager 1 Harvilla, George From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 7:28 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: Re:-Video of South Highland Sewer I agree with this and understand it. Scott A. Snyder On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 19:27:01 -0800 (PST) , "Harvilla, George" wrote: Video of South Highland Sewer Scott, At a meeting today attended by you, Carlos Navarro, Tom Holliman, Ralph Roberts, Garret Richardson, and me, at which the video of the pipe cracks was played, the consensus of all attendees was that the cracks warranted repair or pipe replacement. After determining whether you are going to repair or replace the pipe, please contact Carlos and me for final approval before commencing on the repairs. Thank you. George Harvilla Consultant Project Manager 1 } Harvilla, George .... . .. 'i From: Harvilla, George Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 4:52 PM To: 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.' Cc: 'Carlos Navarro'; 'Garrett8richardson @yahoo.com'; 'Tom Holliman'; 'Ralph Roberts'; Ralph Roberts at Home (coralph@earthlink.net); Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org); Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org) Subject: Video of South Highland Sewer Scott, At a meeting today attended by you, Carlos Navarro,Tom Holliman, Ralph Roberts, Garret Richardson, and me, at which the video of the pipe cracks was played,the consensus of all attendees was that the cracks warranted repair or pipe replacement. After determining whether you are going to repair or replace the pipe, please contact Carlos and me for final approval before commencing on the repairs. Thank you. George Harvilla Consultant Project Manager Harvilla, George 11 4. A From: Harvilla, George Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Carlos Navarro (cnavarro@fontana.org); 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.'; 'garrett8richardson@yahoo.co ; 'Tom Holliman'; 'Ralph Roberts'; Ralph Roberts at Home (coralph@earthlink.net) Cc: 'Ray Bragg'; 'Carla Pursel' Subject: Meeting to View Sewer Video Importance: High A meeting will be held Wednesday, Nov. 13 at 1:00 p.m. in the Conference Room of the Engineering Annex, 17001 Upland Avenue (just east of Sierra Ave.), Fontana,to view the video of the crack in the sewer pipe under Juniper Avenue. The Engineering Annex is located behind Fontana City Hall. Visit www.mapquest.com for directions/map. If your name is under"To:"above, please try to attend. We want everyone's perspective to determine whether this crack is serious enough to warrant replacement of the pipe. 2 ( f° /"i Thank you. fit,, George Harvilla Consultant Project Manger 909-427-9169 , r Harvilla George From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 1:30 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: Re: Rejected Claim I appreciate your reply. I will appeal the claim being denied and take those steps necessary. As far as who honesty goes I had thought you, Ralph, and Bryan to all be honest. And here is my dilemma. Bryan has proven to me that he doesn't lie, and I am told by him the story you heard from me. I don't see why Bryan would just break this out on his own without receiving direction from those representing the city. I must standby what he has said, that he was directed to remove the line. I see no other reason since for every other substructure he pulled the shield and skipped over such things. It makes sense he would do the same for this unless told otherwise. So I take it you don't recall it as Bryan said,that Ralph called you and told you of the line and the decision of it being unsafe? When you arrived out there you had no discussion with them and hearing that it was believed unsafe and to remove it? Of course without having it in writing I have little to make my case with, as you all well know. What bothers me also is that I see this like this.That on a half million dollar project if this claim is denied then there are NO claims, except those initiated by the City themselves.This would be a nice feather in the hat for those involved. It also give's the appearance that Associated did a wonderful job when in truth their administrative work was not what the city paid for. You should know that as well as I do. On the other hand the job I did and you had done is what the city paid for and more. I will be making claim for the other items that Associated failed to respond to when I notified them. For these there is no easy out since I have it all in writing. And there's a number of follow up's to their initial notice's from us, all going without any response what so ever. Making any comments in an Inspectors daily report meaningless cause nothing was ever said or given in writing. Besides there's nothing in those reports covering those claims anyway. And it's to come from the Engr in writing as I showed you. One more thing George. You kept being told by Assoc that I was not following proper procedure per SSPWC section 3.That even went so far as said that there's a form to follow in section 3-4. I showed you at that Friday mtng what 3-4 said. But I didn't think at the time to point out how there's no such thing nor does it say what Assoc claimed. Take a look again for your own self because all of section 3 I followed to the letter and it's going to be what wins my claims for me. And what sinks Assoc. That's what made me so angered back then, Assoc having the gull to claim I failed in procedure when the very sections they quote along with my proof in black and white makes them look ridicules to say the least. Anybody taking the time to read for themselves what is written in those sections will see it clearly or should. If unable to follow it then at the least it can be seen that there is no such form as Assoc claims, no such thing as any of their comments state. Yet it has been taken for granted what they say is what's there. Look for your self and if that doesn't make you see how strong of a case I have for claims I would have dropped with the irrigation line approval. Now it's a different matter. And Assoc has no support at all. Could it be that the reason the city and others don't want to get involved and do what's right is because in their contract with Assoc there's that clause that's in mine,to hold the city harmless of all claims and omissions.?!! That makes it convenient for the City to not own up to responsibility since should I go to court the whole thing is then up to ASSOC to settle or pay and to fight in court. The problem with that is I'm smart enough to figure out those tricks and I imagine a arbitrator or a Judge will not like what is being done to me. I think they will be rather bothered by what a big conflict this is. Perhaps you may want to give the city a heads up before I call them about these things. I'm sure the city Attorney will take a keen interest when I call him or my Attorney call's. I haven't made up my mind yet, to call myself or tell my attorney about this latest findings and let him call. This is only saying it how it is George don't take it personal. It's Business. On Mon, 11 Nov 2002 12:40:17-0800 (PST), "Harvilla, George"wrote: Re: Rejected Claim Scott, I was not in the field when the irrigation line was discovered, and therefore I did not instruct Bryan to remove it. Ralph called me shortly after the line was found, and by the time I arrived, your field crew was jack hammering through the cobble/concrete encasement and the concrete pipe. Ralph, in his role of inspector, was representing the City of Fontana. His account of what happened is recorded in his daily report and was reiterated in the letter from Tom Holliman of Associated Engineers rejecting your claim. I was typically in the field every other day, observing both Ralph and your crew. Ralph has always been upfront and honest in dealing with me, and with the staff of A. D. General. I also feel Bryan was always honest with me as well. Your version of what happened differs from the inspector's. Should you wish to appeal, Tom has stated in his letter to you the appropriate procedure from the Green Book. George Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D.'Gen.,Engr. To: Harvilla, George Sent: 11/8/02 1:14 AM I just received by U.S. mail a letter from Tom of Assoc. rejecting my claim for the irrigation line work.You were CC'd a copy. Before I reply to Tom I wanted to see what type of person you really are. I meaning of course how you and Ralph instructed Bryan to remove the Irrigation Line because you two believed it was unsafe. That was commendable at the time, more concerned for people's safety than some money. You know George, I've given you a great amount of respect. I believed you deserved of it.What you do now will show me if I was wrong. You may ask yourself, how can I be so blunt?? I can because if You, and Ralph also, can sit back in silence, why the hell would I care about offending you! If your not a Man of your word you don't deserve My respect or courtesy. Should you keep silent then your literally stealing from my family, my employee's, and myself.That's not an act deserved of anything but my utter disdain. If you are a Honorable Man this letter will give you reason to feel good about yourself as well as have respect for my being able to confront a person that is not Honorable. Bryan,Jodie and I have said to each other what we think you will do.We all truly think you will speak out.We shall see wont we George. FW:‘Rejected Claim Page 1 of 3 Harvilla, George From: Tom Holliman [tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:50 To: 'Harvilla, George' Subject: RE: Rejected Claim Hi George, I just finished reading your response and Scott initial letter. From the tone of the e-mail I suspect I will be recieving an equally colorful letter in response. You may recall in my previous conversations that the relationship between the owner and contractor has to be a formal one. Anytime a contractor believes they can deal with the owner on a personal level and side step the conditions of the contract they will, especially when its to their advantage. Apparently Scott has realized he has no contractual basis to press a claim or he would not have resorted to the personal pressure and inuendo regarding "what you're made of". If Scott has a basis for a claim, supported by the terms of the contract, let him present them. If the rejection is reverserd based on new information that's fine, but the obligation for that information is his. If you want to side step Scott and ask him to direct all communications regarding claims to me and Ralph that's fine, I'll take care of these issues. Welcome to the games phase of the contract. Tom P.S. For the record, I think you've been more than fair with Scott and AD General,your patience in dealing with him has been commendable,too bad he didn't return the favor. Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:28 PM To: Tom Holliman'; 'Ralph Roberts'; Ralph Roberts at Home (coralph@earthlink.net) Cc: Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org); 'Carla Pursel' Subject: FW: Rejected Claim FYI Original Message From: Harvilla, George Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:25 PM To: 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.' Subject: Re: Rejected Claim Scott, I was not in the field when the irrigation line was discovered, and therefore I did not instruct Bryan to remove it. Ralph called me shortly after the line was found, and by the time I arrived, your field crew was jack hammering through the cobble/concrete encasement and the concrete pipe. Ralph, in his role of inspector, was representing the City of Fontana. His account of what happened is recorded in his daily report and was reiterated in the letter from Tom Holliman of Associated Engineers rejecting your claim. I was typically in the field every other day, observing both Ralph and your crew. Ralph has always been upfront and honest in dealing with me, and with the staff of A. D. General. I also feel Bryan was always honest with me as well. 11/12/2002 FW:'Rejected Claim Page 2 of 3 Your version of what happened differs from the inspector's. Should you wish to appeal, Tom has stated in his letter to you the appropriate procedure from the Green Book. George Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. To: Harvilla, George Sent: 11/8/02 1:14 AM I just received by U.S. mail a letter from Tom of Assoc. rejecting my claim for the irrigation line work. You were CC'd a copy. Before I reply to Tom I wanted to see what type of person you really are. I meaning of course how you and Ralph instructed Bryan to remove the Irrigation Line because you two believed it was unsafe.That was commendable at the time, more concerned for people's safety than some money. You know George, I've given you a great amount of respect. I believed you deserved of it. What you do now will show me if I was wrong. You may ask yourself, how can I be so blunt?? I can because if You, and Ralph also, can sit back in silence, why the hell would I care about offending you! If your not a Man of your word you don't deserve My respect or courtesy. Should you keep silent then your literally stealing from my family, my employee's, and myself. That's not an act deserved of anything but my utter disdain. If you are a Honorable Man this letter will give you reason to 11/12/2002 FW: Rejected Claim Page 3 of 3 feel good about yourself as well as have respect for my being able to confront a person that is not Honorable. Bryan, Jodie and I have said to each other what we think you will do. We all truly think you will speak out.We shall see wont we George. 11/12/2002 f H�r�t��a, George From: Tom Holliman [tomh@assoc-eng.com] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 3:32 PM To: 'Harvilla, George' Subject: RE: Rejected Claim Hi George, It's amazing that Scott has a number of claims he hasn't pressed and can document since I wasn't aware that there were any other items outstanding except the irrigation line and the Ayala Boring issue. Ralph had mentioned something about extra water for compaction but I had understood from Ralph that AD wasn't pressing that one. If there are other claims AD should present them along with the required documentation and if they're legitimate per the contract we will recommend approval. As Scott said this is business, not personal. Associated Engineers has no vested interest in avoiding recommending legitimate changes to the contract, with proper documentation. In the case of the reductions in the cost of the concrete we agreed that a price adjustment was warranted immediately upon presentation at the meeting. We even held open the meeting, called for AD's convenience,for an hour and a half beyond the agreed upon time to help them provide us with what we need to satisfy the contract provisions. I will not engage AD in an exchange of emails. If AD has additional claims, make them. I believe it is in the best interests of the City to move ahead with the Notice of Acceptance as quickly as possible, barring anything significant in the videotape. Even if the videotape showed a crack worthy of repair/replacement this could be handled as a warranty item since the pipeline passed the air test. We must put a timeline in place to force any remaining issues to the table so we can close out this project. If you're available we could meet before the videotape viewing on Wednesday to discuss this on-going battle of words. Tom Holliman Associated Engineers Original Message From: Harvilla, Georgel', mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 3:14 PM To: Tom Holliman (E-mail); Ralph Roberts.(E-mail); Ralph Roberts at Home (E-mail) Subject: FW: Rejected Claim FYI Original Message From: Scott A.Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. (mailto:adgenengr @ directvinternet.coml Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 1:30 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: Re: Rejected Claim I appreciate your reply. I will appeal the claim being denied and take those steps necessary. As far as who honesty goes I had thought you, Ralph, and Bryan to all be honest. And here is my dilemma. Bryan has proven to me that he doesn't lie, and I am told by him the story you heard from me. I don't see why Bryan would just break this out on his own without receiving direction from those representing the city. I must standby what he has said, that he was directed to remove the line. I see no other reason since for every other substructure he pulled the shield and skipped over such things. It makes sense he would do the same for this unless told otherwise. So I take it you don't recall it as Bryan said, that Ralph called you and told you of the line and the decision of it being unsafe? When you arrived out there you had no discussion with them and hearing that it was believed unsafe and to remove it? Of course without having it in writing I have little to make my case with, as you all well know. What bothers me also is that I see this like this. That on a half million dollar project if this claim is denied then there are NO claims, except those initiated by the City themselves.This would be a nice feather in the hat for those involved. It also give's the appearance that Associated did a wonderful job when in truth their administrative work was not what the city paid for. You should know that as well as I do. On the other hand the job I did and you had done is what the city paid for and more. I will be making claim for the other items that Associated failed to respond to when I notified them. For these there is no easy out since I have it all in writing. And there's a number of follow up's to their initial notice's from us, all going without any response what so ever. Making any comments in an Inspectors daily report meaningless cause nothing was ever said or given in writing. Besides there's nothing in those reports covering those claims anyway.And it's to come from the Engr in writing as I showed you. One more thing George. You kept being told by Assoc that I was not following proper procedure per SSPWC section 3.That even went so far as said that there's a form to follow in section 3-4. I showed you at that Friday mtng what 3-4 said. But I didn't think at the time to point out how there's no such thing nor does it say what Assoc claimed. Take a look again for your own self because all of section 3 I followed to the letter and it's going to be what wins my claims for me. And what sinks Assoc. That's what made me so angered back then, Assoc having the gull to claim I failed in procedure when the very sections they quote along with my proof in black and white makes them look ridicules to say the least.Anybody taking the time to read for themselves what is written in those sections will see it clearly or should. If unable to follow it then at the least it can be seen that there is no such form as Assoc claims, no such thing as any of their comments state. Yet it has been taken for granted what they say is what's there. Look for your self and if that doesn't make you see how strong of a case I have for claims I would have dropped with the irrigation line approval. Now it's a different matter.And Assoc has no support at all. Could it be that the reason the city and others don't want to get involved and do what's right is because in their contract with Assoc there's that clause that's in mine,to hold the city harmless of all claims and omissions.?!! That makes it convenient for the City to not own up to responsibility since should I go to court the whole thing is then up to ASSOC to settle or pay and to fight in court.The problem with that is I'm smart enough to figure out those tricks and I imagine a arbitrator or a Judge will not like what is being done to me. I think they will be rather bothered by what a big conflict this is. Perhaps you may want to give the city a heads up before I call them about these things. I'm sure the city Attorney will take a keen interest when I call him or my Attorney call's. I haven't made up my mind yet, to call myself or tell my attorney about this latest findings and let him call. This is only saying it how it is George don't take it personal. J It's Business. On Mon, 11 Nov 2002 12:40:17-0800 (PST), "Harvilla, George"wrote: Re: Rejected Claim Scott, I was not in the field when the irrigation line was discovered, and therefore I did not instruct Bryan to remove it. Ralph called me shortly after the line was found, and by the time I arrived, your field crew was jack hammering through the cobble/concrete encasement and the concrete pipe. Ralph, in his role of inspector,was representing the City of Fontana. His account of what happened is recorded in his daily report and was reiterated in the letter from Tom Holliman of Associated Engineers rejecting your claim. I was typically in the field every other day, observing both Ralph and your crew. Ralph has always been upfront and honest in dealing with me, and with the staff of A. D. General. I also feel Bryan was always honest with me as well. Your version of what happened differs from the inspector's. Should you wish to appeal,Tom has stated in his letter to you the appropriate procedure from the Green Book. George Original Message From: Scott A.Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. _ . To: Harvilla, George Sent: 11/8/02 1:14 AM I just received by U.S. mail a letter from Tom of Assoc. rejecting my claim for the irrigation line work. You were CC'd a copy. Before I reply to Tom I wanted to see what type of person you really are. I meaning of course how you and Ralph instructed Bryan to remove the Irrigation Line because you two believed it was unsafe. That was commendable at the time, more concerned for people's safety than some money. You know George, I've given you a great amount of respect. I believed you deserved of it. What you do now will show me if I was wrong. You may ask yourself, how can I be so blunt?? I can because if You, and Ralph also, can sit back in silence, why the hell would I care about offending you! If your not a Man of your word you don't deserve My respect or courtesy. Should you keep silent then your literally stealing from my family, my employee's, and myself. That's not an act deserved of anything but my utter disdain. If you are a Honorable Man this letter will give you reason to feel good about yourself as well as have respect for my being able to confront a person that is not Honorable. Bryan, Jodie and I i have said to each other what we think you will do. We all truly think you will speak out. We shall see wont we George. Harvlla, George..: . . From: Harvilla, George Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 1:34 PM To: Carla Purse! (cpursel@fontana.org) Subject: Sewer Project Identification Sign FYI,the South Highland Sewer project identification signs have been removed. GH Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 2:49 PM To: Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org) Cc: 'Ray Bragg' Subject: Sewer Identification Sign Carla, Since the sewer project is essentially complete, I think the Project Identification Signs can now be removed. Please schedule with Anthony Ciotti. Ask him if he could get them down by Thanksgiving. George Clear Day Page 1 of 1 Harvilla, George From: Carla Pursel [cpursel@fontana.org] Sent: Monday, October 14,2002 11:36 To: 'George Harvilla @ PB' Cc: Ray Bragg; Harry Foley Subject: RWW Project Signs George - FYI I spoke to Anthony Ciotti in Public Services about removing the signs and storing them. He said all we have to do is call him to coordinate the removal and that his guys would do their best to remove the signs without destroying them so that they may be re-used if possible. He said if they are damaged during the removal he would let us know. He also said that Public Services does have room available for storage and will keep them for us. So -just let me know when and I'll schedule the removal. cp Carla S. Pursel Administrative Project Coordinator CITY OF FONTANA Redevelopment&Special Projects 909.350.6792 10/14/2002 Harvilla, George From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:13 AM To: RALPH ROBERTS Cc: George Harvilla; TOM HOLLIMAN; Ralph Roberts Subject: Broken MH Bases We just received a call from Olson Precast stating they would be sending us a bill for their time repairing those M.H. 's "THEY" broke. And they are filing a Stop Notice on the job because of this. I need that copy of your daily report as we discussed. Your report clearly refutes what they are now claiming. This is a ploy on their part to try and offset the back charges we must bill. When it happened Olson was apologetic stating they would fix the bases, and pay A.D. 's additional work cost's. Now they claim a different story. They state A.D. used the excavated rocks as backfill, carelessly dumping them on top of the pipe and around the M.H. which caused the pipe breaks and the bases to crack. Also that we carelessly banged into the M.H. with the sheeps foot when compacting and ran over them with our other equipment. Ralph you know this is not true. Per your direction and under your Inspection all M.H. 's were backfilled with 3/4" and smaller crushed aggregate, and no destructive compaction equip or methods were permitted or used. Further more you observed Olson using careless destructive acts. 1 f ' Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 3:14 PM To: Tom Holliman (E-mail); Ralph Roberts (E-mail); Ralph Roberts at Home (E-mail) Subject: FW: Rejected Claim FYI Original Message From Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.fmailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.coml Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 1:30 PM To: Harvilla, George Subject: Re: Rejected Claim I appreciate your reply. I will appeal the claim being denied and take those steps necessary. As far as who honesty goes I had thought you, Ralph, and Bryan to all be honest. And here is my dilemma. Bryan has proven to me that he doesn't lie, and I am told by him the story you heard from me. I don't see why Bryan would just break this out on his own without receiving direction from those representing the city. I must standby what he has said, that he was directed to remove the line. I see no other reason since for every other substructure he pulled the shield and skipped over such things. It makes sense he would do the same for this unless told otherwise. So I take it you don't recall it as Bryan said, that Ralph called you and told you of the line and the decision of it being unsafe? When you arrived out there you had no discussion with them and hearing that it was believed unsafe and to remove it? Of course without having it in writing I have little to make my case with, as you all well know. What bothers me also is that I see this like this.That on a half million dollar project if this claim is denied then there are NO claims, except those initiated by the City themselves. This would be a nice feather in the hat for those involved. It also give's the appearance that Associated did a wonderful job when in truth their administrative work was not what the city paid for. You should know that as well as I do. On the other hand the job I did and you had done is what the city paid for and more. I will be making claim for the other items that Associated failed to respond to when I notified them. For these there is no easy out since I have it all in writing. And there's a number of follow up's to their initial notice's from us, all going without any response what so ever. Making any comments in an Inspectors daily report meaningless cause nothing was ever said or given in writing. Besides there's nothing in those reports covering those claims anyway. And it's to come from the Engr in writing as I showed you. One more thing George. You kept being told by Assoc that I was not following proper procedure per SSPWC section 3.That even went so far as said that there's a form to follow in section 3-4. showed you at that Friday mtng what 3-4 said. But I didn't think at the time to point out how there's no such thing nor does it say what Assoc claimed. Take a look again for your own self because all of section 3 I followed to the letter and it's going to be what wins my claims for me. And what sinks Assoc.That's what made me so angered back then, Assoc having the gull to claim I failed in procedure when the very sections they quote along with my proof in black and white makes them look ridicules to say the least. Anybody taking the time to read for themselves what is written in those sections will see it clearly or should. If unable to follow it then at the least it can be seen that there is no such form as Assoc claims, no such i thing as any of their comments state. Yet it has been taken for granted what they say is what's there. Look for your self and if that doesn't make you see how strong of a case I have for claims I would have dropped with the irrigation line approval. Now it's a different matter. And Assoc has no support at all. Could it be that the reason the city and others don't want to get involved and do what's right is because in their contract with Assoc there's that clause that's in mine,to hold the city harmless of all claims and omissions.?!! That makes it convenient for the City to not own up to responsibility since should I go to court the whole thing is then up to ASSOC to settle or pay and to fight in court.The problem with that is I'm smart enough to figure out those tricks and I imagine a arbitrator or a Judge will not like what is. being done to me. I think they will be rather bothered by what a big conflict this is. Perhaps you may want to give the city a heads up before I call them about these things. I'm sure the city Attorney will take a keen interest when I call him or my Attorney call's. I haven't made up my mind yet, to call myself or tell my attorney about this latest findings and let him call. This is only saying it how it is George don't take it personal. It's Business. On Mon, 11 Nov 2002 12:40:17-0800 (PST), "Harvilla, George"wrote: I Re: Rejected Claim Scott, I was not in the field when the irrigation line was discovered, and therefore I did not instruct Bryan to remove it. Ralph called me shortly after the line was found, and by the time I arrived, your field crew was jack hammering through the cobble/concrete encasement and the concrete pipe. Ralph, in his role of inspector, was representing the City of Fontana. His account of what happened is recorded in his daily report and was reiterated in the letter from Tom Holliman of Associated Engineers rejecting your claim. I was typically in the field every other day, observing both Ralph and your crew. Ralph has always been upfront and honest in dealing with me, and with the staff of A. D. General. I also feel Bryan was always honest with me as well. Your version of what happened differs from the inspector's. Should you wish to appeal, Tom has stated in his letter to you the appropriate procedure from the Green Book. George Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. To: Harvilla, George Sent: 11/8/02 1:14 AM I just received by U.S. mail a letter from Tom of Assoc. rejecting my claim for the irrigation line work.You were CC'd a copy. Before I reply to Tom I wanted to see what type of person you really are. I meaning of course how you and Ralph instructed Bryan to remove the Irrigation Line because you two believed it was unsafe.That was commendable at the time, more concerned for people's safety than some money. You know George, I've given you a great amount of respect. believed you deserved of it. What you do now will show me if I was wrong. You may ask yourself, how can I be so blunt?? I can because if You, and Ralph also,can sit back in silence, why the hell would I care about offending you! If your not a Man of your word you don't deserve My respect or courtesy. Should you keep silent then your literally stealing from my family, my employee's, and myself.That's not an act deserved of anything but my utter disdain. If you are a Honorable Man this letter will give you reason to feel good about yourself as well as have respect for my being able to confront a person that is not Honorable. Bryan, Jodie and I have said to each other what we think you will do.We all truly think you will speak out.We shall see wont we George. Harm! a, George. .. From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 1:35 PM To: RALPH ROBERTS Cc: Harvilla, George;TOM HOLLIMAN; Ralph Roberts Subject: Damaged MH Bottoms Ralph I need that information from you about those damaged MH's by Olsen precast, you said you'd get it to me last week when I spoke with you. Please send to me asap. Thank You. SCOTT A. SNYDER Harvilla George . From: Harvilla, George Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:25 PM To: 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.' Subject: Re: Rejected Claim Scott, I was not in the field when the irrigation line was discovered, and therefore I did not instruct Bryan to remove it. Ralph called me shortly after the line was found, and by the time I arrived, your field crew was jack hammering through the cobble/concrete encasement and the concrete pipe. Ralph, in his role of inspector, was representing the City of Fontana. His account of what happened is recorded in his daily report and was reiterated in the letter from Tom Holliman of Associated Engineers rejecting your claim. I was typically in the field every other day, observing both Ralph and your crew. Ralph has always been upfront and honest in dealing with me, and with the staff of A. D. General. I also feel Bryan was always honest with me as well. Your version of what happened differs from the inspector's. Should you wish to appeal,Tom has stated in his letter to you the appropriate procedure from the Green Book. George Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. To: Harvilla, George Sent: 11/8/02 1:14 AM I just received by U.S. mail a letter from Tom of Assoc. rejecting my claim for the irrigation line work. You were CC'd a copy. Before I reply to Tom I wanted to see what type of person you really are. I meaning of course how you and Ralph instructed Bryan to remove the Irrigation Line because you two believed it was unsafe.That was commendable at the time, more concerned for people's safety than some money. You know George, I've given you a great amount of respect. believed you deserved of it.What you do now will show me if I was wrong. You may ask yourself, how can I be so blunt?? I can because if You, and Ralph also, can sit back in silence, why the hell would I care about offending you! If your not a Man of your word you don't deserve My respect or courtesy. Should you keep silent then your literally stealing from my family, my employee's, and myself. That's not an act deserved of anything but my utter disdain. y If you are a Honorable Man this letter will give you reason to feel good about yourself as well as have respect for my being able to confront a person that is not Honorable. Bryan,Jodie and I have said to each other what we think you will do. We all truly think you will speak out.We shall see wont we George. FW: Rejected Claim Page 1 of 2 Harvilla, George From: Ray Bragg [rbragg@fontana.org] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:46 To: Harvilla, George Subject: RE: Rejected Claim George: Keep up the good documentation. Ray Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:28 PM To: 'Tom Holliman'; 'Ralph Roberts'; Ralph Roberts at Home (coralph@earthlink.net) Cc: Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org); 'Carla Pursel' Subject: FW: Rejected Claim FYI Original Message From: Harvilla, George Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:25 PM To: 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.' Subject: Re: Rejected Claim Scott, I was not in the field when the irrigation line was discovered, and therefore I did not instruct Bryan to remove it. Ralph called me shortly after the line was found, and by the time I arrived, your field crew was jack hammering through the cobble/concrete encasement and the concrete pipe. Ralph, in his role of inspector, was representing the City of Fontana. His account of what happened is recorded in his daily report and was reiterated in the letter from Tom Holliman of Associated Engineers rejecting your claim. I was typically in the field every other day, observing both Ralph and your crew. Ralph has always been upfront and honest in dealing with me, and with the staff of A. D. General. I also feel Bryan was always honest with me as well. Your version of what happened differs from the inspector's. Should you wish to appeal, Tom has stated in his letter to you the appropriate procedure from the Green Book. George Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. To: Harvilla, George 11/11/2002 FW: Rejected Claim Page 2 of 2 Sent: 11/8/02 1:14 AM I just received by U.S. mail a letter from Tom of Assoc. rejecting my claim for the irrigation line work. You were CC'd a copy. Before I reply to Tom I wanted to see what type of person you really are. I meaning of course how you and Ralph instructed Bryan to remove the Irrigation Line because you two believed it was unsafe.That was commendable at the time, more concerned for people's safety than some money. You know George, I've given you a great amount of respect. I believed you deserved of it. What you do now will show me if I was wrong. You may ask yourself, how can I be so blunt?? I can because if You, and Ralph also, can sit back in silence, why the hell would I care about offending you! If your not a Man of your word you don't deserve My respect or courtesy. Should you keep silent then your literally stealing from my family, my employee's, and myself.That's not an act deserved of anything but my utter disdain. If you are a Honorable Man this letter will give you reason to feel good about yourself as well as have respect for my being able to confront a person that is not Honorable. Bryan, Jodie and I have said to each other what we think you will do.We all truly think you will speak out.We shall see wont we George. 11/11/2002 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 11:41 AM To: 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.' Subject: RE: Video Scott, I have set up a meeting to view the video for this Wednesday at 1:00 p.m. Another e-mail with details will follow. Please try to attend. We need the perspectives of everyone - manufacturer, engineer, owner, and installer. George Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. rmailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:30 PM To: Harvilla@pbworld.com Subject: RE: Video George, I spoke with Mission Pipe's rep, Mr. Garret Richardson, today, Friday 11/08/02. He said he is available Monday or Wednesday. I did not remember until just a bit ago that Monday is a National Holiday, so that makes Monday no good. How does Wednesday at noon sound for you? It's the preferred time for Mr. Richardson but he said that could be moved up or down to accommodate others schedules. Please let me know as soon as possible. If you would like it may be easier if you contacted him directly instead of me being a middle person. His mobile phone number is 909-721-6861, his office number 909-721-6869. Also I was thinking perhaps it might be best if I was not present at that viewing so that you may be with the rep alone and I would not be an influence in any way. What do you think? "Harvilla, George" wrote: > Scott, > Carlos Navarro from Fontana Public Works has the video and will > schedule a time to view it. I have e-mailed him at least twice to get > a date and time > to view it. Hopefully, he will get back to me next week. > George > Original Message > From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. > To: Harvilla, George > Sent: 11/8/02 12:09 AM > Subject: Video > Mission Rep was busy this week but I will speak with him Friday to set > a day and time for next week. 1 Video Inspection of South Highland Sewer Page 1 of 3 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 9:23 AM To: Carlos Navarro (cnavarro@fontana.org) Cc: 'Carla Pursel' Subject: FW: Video Inspection of South Highland Importance: High Carlos, Can you schedule the video showing for next week? I'm free all week except Monday morning. George Original Message From: Harvilla, George Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 4:12 PM To: Carlos Navarro (cnavarro@fontana.org) Subject: FW: Video Inspection of South Highland Sewer Importance: High Carlos, Sorry, my plans have changed again. My trip to LA is now this Friday, November 8, not Wednesday. George Original Message From: Harvilla, George Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 2:16 PM To: 'Carlos Navarro' Subject: FW: Video Inspection of South Highland Sewer Importance: High Carlos, This Wednesday is not good for me— I'll be in L.A. Thursday or Friday are OK for me. George Original Message From: Harvilla, George Sent:Friday, November 01, 2002 9:25 AM To: Carlos Navarro (cnavarro@fontana.org); 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr.'; 'Tom Holliman'; 'Ralph Roberts'; Ralph Roberts at Home (coralph@earthlink.net) Cc: Ray Bragg (rbragg@fontana.org); 'Carla Pursel' Subject: FW: Video Inspection of South Highland Sewer Importance: High Carlos, Can you please arrange for a viewing of the tape, to be attended by you and/or your staff, me,Tom Holliman, Ralph Roberts, Scott Snyder, and anyone else Scott wants to bring? I think it would be best if we all view the tape together and then discuss what actions are necessary, if any. 11/11/2002 Video Inspection of South Highland Sewer Page 2 of 3 Scott needs to travel from Burbank, so an early afternoon time might be the best, say, late next week. Please decide on a date and time, and let us know. Thank you, George Harvilla Consultant Project Manger Original Message From: Carlos Navarro [mailto:cnavarro@fontana.org] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 9:19 AM To: Harvilla, George Cc: Yousuf Patanwala Subject: FW: Video Inspection of South Highland Sewer Importance: High George , First of all, Good Morning. After I received this response from Anthony, I make contact with Ralph Roberts. He was informed of the crack in the system 10' plus or minus, north of manhole#5. I also understand that this portion of the system passed the air test. Lets review the video tape before any other action is taken at this location. Let me know what you think, I've requested the tape from operations. Carlos Original Message From: Anthony Ciotti Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 6:59 AM To: Carlos Navarro Subject: RE: Video Inspection of South Highland Sewer Good Morning Carlos, I spoke with Bill Neeper regarding this matter, he informed me that there was a crack in a section of pipe and a couple of areas of debris within the pipe. He said he reported this to Ralph Roberts. We have the video sitting on Bill's desk if you need it. Thanks AC Original Message From: Carlos Navarro Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 6:00 AM To: Anthony Ciotti Subject: FW: Video Inspection of South Highland Sewer Importance: High Anthony, would you let me know if the guys found anything wrong on then sewer video? Thanks Carlos Original Message From: Harvilla, George [mailto:Harvilla@pbworld.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 10:04 AM To: 'Carlos Navarro' Cc: 'Tom Holliman'; Ralph Roberts (ralphr@assoc-eng.com); 'Ralph Roberts at Home'; 'Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org) 11/11/2002 Video Inspection of South Highland Sewer Page 3 of 3 Subject: Video Inspection of South Highland Sewer Carlos, Please let us know when you will report your findings from the video surveillance of the South Highland Sewer. Thank you, George Harvilla Consultant Project Manager 11/11/2002 CITY OF FONTANA REPORT NO. INSPECTORS DAILY REPORT DATE 7-2 9—O s— CIRCLE DAY (159 T W T F SS SHIFT HOURS START o6:30 STOP ,Nip /7,•0 4./44Np7/.74,n#pi $ c f'k hi/et// 4'Ut) Seweft-- HOURS-ITEM NO. WEATHER PROJECT CONTRACTOR EQUIP MEN DESCRIPTION REMARKS •70 842 ex e: / € Gar 936 / 9 JO 91to AL 9 w7 ( w AT" r 9 `3's �weef� thB RoLu ( Or ot-A 77L A- / 1 L rF lS o,GL F- /c, • Oo&/7iJt*.t1) Lr.�. '' srA 81.5-0 /0,.0a c /SO >r VC )n,. Ar /40.•1 a ,q•.• w e Z1.4 Q Cow/rt t<r eµ e A 3 twt e,i T c Sr-4 /71 83-• /T 4,Y)640-L> To bP IA) //2 4-7-I a.J Li Av E ,. Sv 0, t'3 e i o w .00JeA► a-vet-- CA Ci .Pu,e71-e/2... PirldbLL# AJr go..4.rt.Q 1 %4 4.)ci I ,Avc_. n Co-I r2fr7 tj rh, CoA. 1 /eaCf /wl geAE-40 t Cm'1C4 E;`TL'. /✓BT7tr7 cr0 baa-G-e /i ea-4in S,4A1 Cyr 6(2.4 cJ.rfL�l1. Tm,✓. AIlt/II--w.A-3 • 4-K (�.uS«l/L P cryes Yy4Ice&. N'o7 Co M PcC-TA='L7 sat L t.Jf'1Per Lt L1Ne eS . 2r Lccac Gnc V/NvyAn-rN t��(j2iG^►Tla� . 1.1't IS LA h al tr-U''t IT 16p $ 7"2 u Cr-)R 1. e S f v 3%_ L.R-. 0-e L.A-c-� Tb V'aDP't c rl o A-) . Ate— sa14S 7i-sr Ai-.s'S't 1 `/C 71t-0 C ‘t)o D . CONTRACTOR INSP_CTOR • Associated Engineers, Inc. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 1-1 3311 E.SHELBY STREET,ONTARIO,CA 91764-4872 (909)980-1982 FAX(909)941-0891 I■ ■ ■ November 1, 2002 Mr. Scott Snyder A.D. General Engineering Construction, Inc. 2829 N. Glenoaks Blvd. Suite 106/101 Burbank, CA 91504 Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— Claim for Extra Work for Replacement of Irrigation Line on Juniper Avenue Dear Mr. Snyder: We have reviewed your claim in the amount of $8,700.00 for the subject work and have concluded that the claim does not qualify for approval under the terms of Contract Number SP- 46-02. The terms of the contract provide specific requirements and conditions that must be met before a claim for extra work can be approved. Those requirements and conditions are spelled out in the following referenced section of the contract. Section 5-4, Relocation, of the latest edition of the "Greenbook" which applies to this project, "Temporary or permanent relocation or alternation of utilities requested by the Contractor for its convenience shall be its responsibility and it shall make all arrangements and bear all costs." The new sewer pipeline being laid across the irrigation main was more than five feet below the irrigation pipe and its encasement. Further, the standard joint length of pipeline being laid was longer than the approximately three-foot width of the encasement. Instead of tunneling under the conduit, as you did with the PacBell conduit interference at Juniper and Walnut, and the curb and gutter on Juniper to install the house laterals, you elected to remove the pipeline for your convenience. From our review of the work, it appears that your decision was based on your desire not to remove and reset the shield you were using for shoring the trench wall. Therefore, in order to continue to "drag" the shield, you removed the pipeline. Keeping in mind that you determine your own methods of construction, it is clear that this removal and replacement was not "required" to complete the project as designed. Further, there is no reason to believe that the sewer pipe could not be installed without removing the irrigation pipe. Therefore, Section 5-4 places the full cost of the replacement on the Contractor. \\ASSOC-WIN2K\support1\JOB-iJO\2001\01-064\Rejection of change order for irrigation line 10_29_02.doc PLANNING DESIGNING SURVEYING November 1,2002 • + Mr.Scott Snyder A.D.General Engineering Construction,Inc. Jf Subject: South Highland and Juniper Avenue Sewer Improvements— • Claim for Extra Work for Replacement of Irrigation Line on Juniper Avenue Page-2 If you wish to dispute these findings, you can exercise your right to dispute this work under the terms of the contract. Section 3-5 contains the provisions for handling situations where the Contractor and the Agency are unable to reach agreement on disputed work. Yours truly, ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS, INC. • Thomas R. Holli ean, PE Senior Project Manager cc: George Harvilla, City of Fontana Ralph Roberts, A-E J.N. 01-064 • • • • • • \\ASSOC-WIN2K\supportl\)0B-NO\2001\01-064\Rejection of change order for irrigation line 10_29 02.doc Harvilla, George From: Scott A.Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 2:26 PM To: TOM HOLLIMAN Cc: George Harvilla Subject: Status of Claims On the Oct 27th I wrote asking the status of the claim for extra for the Boring on Line C. You responded back on the 28th saying to expect a response on Wednesday the 30th for the boring and the irrigation line claim. I have not received anything as of yet. Will I get something soon? Scott A. Snyder 1 Clear Day Page 1 of 1 Harvilla, George From: Carla Pursel [cpursel@fontana.org] Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 9:40 To: 'adgenengr@directvinternet.com' Cc: Harvilla, George Subject: Check Release Importance: High Scott- This is just a note to let you know that we will definitely have a check ready for you on Thursday. I was asked to put a hold-notice on it so that it will not be mailed, that you will be here to it pick up. If that has changed, please let me know. If I can be of any additional assistance, please let me know. Thx! cp Carla S. Pursel Administrative Project Coordinator CITY OF FONTANA Redevelopment&Special Projects 909.350.6792 11 4 2002 Harvilla, George From: Harvilla, George Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 8:33 AM To: Carla Pursel (cpursel@fontana.org) Subject: FW: PROGRESS PAYMENT Carla, Can you send Scott an e-mail to try to ease his concerns? Thanks, George Original Message From: Harvilla, George Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 8:32 AM To: 'Carla Pursel' Subject: FW: PROGRESS PAYMENT Carla, I used the word "hopefully" just in case something fell through at Finance. As usual, please do everything you can to ensure payment on Thursday. Thanks, George Original Message From: Scott A. Snyder/A.D. Gen. Engr. [mailto:adgenengr@directvinternet.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 5:14 PM To: George Harvilla Subject: PROGRESS PAYMENT Hopefully is not good enough. We must have a difinite answer as to when payment will be made.The facts are the pay request should have been processed the first of October as required per contract specs. Failure to comply with the contract specs. has created a financial hardship on us. 1