Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTract 13643HYDROLOGYSTUDY Lot 4, Tract No. 13643 Proposed Mini -Storage Facility City of Fontana County of San Bernardino, California August 14, 2001 Joseph E. Bonadiman & Associates, Inc. 588 West 6' Street San Bernardino, CA 92410 Telephone (909) 885-3806 FAX (909) 381-1721 www.bonadiman.com / DENNIS (�JACKSON I No. C-47434 II� *,"Exp. 12 -03 / I� �.� CIVIL % /r J 1)CQ ZU w�a o �!m Q M ZC N W LL CO LL d O a W Z 0 d W O o . O ~ m � W Z00 O LL � Z LL Lou O �0oaQ W ":r COam _ N �QLL o 0 C3 3 00 Cl ,Um°�° 0 O 00 c o WNc.O� O Lom J U Z ~ y -J ZOULL:D Ur i p n m d O SW[OO o .c-a�� ° 7 4 N d WU�WU HYDROLOGYSTUDY Lot 4, Tract No. 13643 Proposed Mini -Storage Facility City of Fontana County of San Bernardino, California August 14, 2001 Joseph E. Bonadiman & Associates, Inc. 588 West 6' Street San Bernardino, CA 92410 Telephone (909) 885-3806 FAX (909) 381-1721 www.bonadiman.com / DENNIS (�JACKSON I No. C-47434 II� *,"Exp. 12 -03 / I� �.� CIVIL % /r Table of Contents LOCATION MAP - Following Page Subject Page(s) Purpose Methodology Tributary Area 1 - 6 Drainage Plan 7 Soil Loss Rates 7 Rainfall Intensity 7 Area Description and Storm Runoff Results 7 - 8 Hydraulic Analysis 8 Summary 8 ATTACHMENTS Subject Attachment Number Study Maps of Site Area with Flow Routing I Computer Printout - Rational Hydrology Study 2 Rainfall Map - 100 year 1 hour, site area 3 Soil Map - Site Area 4 Computer Printout - WSPGW Culvert Analysis 5 Copy of Profile "B" City of Fontana Foothill Blvd. Storm Drain Plans 6 0 BOUNDARY— T1 0 N S -i T -E L C A m m N; IT 10 scwe r. I - 11 •/ a, 0 oil 4w a -W w .6. on-oll-avol r a _P R RP �wi� 0 a if Nk■ Wb —4 J IMP— PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to determine the factors affecting storm drain design for construction of a Commercial Mini -Storage facility to be constructed on Lot 4, Tract No. 13643, in the City of Fontana, California. These factors include the 100 -year storm event flow rates entering and leaving the site, and a plan for storm drain design. This study presents detailed design proposals to safely transport 100 -year storm event runoff flows within the study area. METHODOLOGY The San Bernardino County Hydrology Manual, dated August 1986, was used for the rational method hydrology analysis for a 100 -year storm event. A CivilDesign® computer program was used to calculate and tabulate the rational method analysis for the post development (after full site construction) flow rates. TRIBUTARY AREA The study area is located immediately north of Foothill Boulevard between Redwood and Hemlock Avenues, and south of Hilton Drive. In general, the site and off-site area drain southwesterly in a sheet flow manner to the north side of Foothill Boulevard. The off-site area is located immediately north of the site where approximately 2.4 acres of currently undeveloped property drain southwesterly from 120' south of Hilton Drive to the northerly property line of the site. This study includes that portion of the off-site area as shown on the maps of Attachment No. 1, for a total drainage area of approximately 5.5 acres. The photographs on the following pages describe the drainage characteristics of the site. The following Photograph No. 1 is looking east along Foothill Boulevard from the southerly location on the existing site: F -A Photograph No. 1 The existing drainage from the north intercepts Foothill Boulevard and flows westerly to an existing storm drain inlet located at the southwest corner of the site connected by an existing 30" RCP to an existing 72" RCP storm drain pipe under Foothill Boulevard. 2 Photograph No. 2 Photograph No. 3 3 Photograph No. 3 looks north from Foothill Blvd. along the eastern property line of the site. The motel building is not affected by runoff from the site, either in existing, or to be developed conditions. The motel site is affected by runoff from an undeveloped area north of the motel site and south of Hilton Drive. Photograph No. 4 below is looking south to Foothill Boulevard from approximately the northwest corner of the site along the western property line. An existing used car lot is located west of the western property line: Photograph No. 4 The existing runoff from the site, and some of the area north of the site, and south of Hilton Drive, is routed in a swale shown on the left (east) site of the fence. An existing earthen berm parallel to the fence prevents existing runoff from entering the used car lot and garage located on the right side of this photograph. M Below, Photograph No. 5 is looking west at the southwest corner of the site. In the center of the photograph, the existing pipe riser with debris rack cage storm drain is shown, which as previously stated, is connected to the 72" RCP under Foothill Boulevard by an existing 30" RCP lateral. Photograph No. 6 shows the same storm drain looking northeast across the site: Photograph No. 5 1 i i �iV Photograph No. 6 61 The following Photograph No. 7 is looking southwest across the site from a grade break approximately 120 feet south of Hilton Drive. Existing runoff south of this location flows southerly to the site. Existing runoff north of this location flows northerly to Hilton Drive as shown on Photograph No. 8. Photograph No. 7 o Photograph No. 8 31 Hilton Drive DRAINAGE PLAN The mini -storage site will be enclosed by a concrete block building wall, 5' inside the property line ofthe site. This will result in off-site drainage flow being directed from east to west along the northerly landscaped 5' from the building wall. The existing runoff from the north of the site flows across the site to the existing storm drain. To prevent the runoff from being diverted to the west of the site, a new storm drain connection will be constructed and installed at the northwest corner of the site development. This storm drain will be routed to the south in a 227' long 24" RCP under the site, southerly parallel to the westerly wall, to a grate inlet catch basin which drains the site itself, then, with a 50' long 30" RCP to a new curb inlet catch basin located immediately west ofthe proposed driveway access, on Foothill Boulevard. This new catch basin will replace the existing pipe riser with debris rack cage catch basin. A new 36" RCP will be connected from the new catch basin to the existing manhole for the 72" RCP storm drain under Foothill Boulevard. This short segment (12' long) of 36" RCP will replace the existing 30" RCP connection. Refer to Attachment No. 1 of this report and the storm drain pians of the site for details of this plan. SOIL LOSS RATES Attachment No. 4 of this study from the San Bernardino County Hydrology Manual shows the Soil Group as "A" for the entire area of study. The off-site area draining through the site currently is an undeveloped area, which is characterized as natural vegetation with poor cover. For the purpose of this study, both the on-site and off-site areas are assumed to be developed, as commercial areas having an impervious ratio of 90%. For the purposes of the 100 -year storm event analysis of this study, an Antecedent Moisture Condition of 2 (AMC II) was used for drainage design. RAINFALL INTENSITY Attachment 3 of this study is a copy of a portion of Figure B-4, of the San Bernardino County Hydrology Manual showing the 100 -year, 1 -hour storm to be 1.45 inches. For the purpose of this study, this was considered the critical storm event for storm drain design. AREA DESCRIPTION AND STORM RUNOFF RESULTS The off-site area of approximately 2.43 acres north of the site, south of Hilton Drive, drains southwesterly from Point No. 1 to Point No. 2 on the map. The exact nature of the type of development planned for this area is unknown, however it is assumed that it will be a commercial type of development. Visual inspection of the off-site area shows that approximately the northern 120' of the area drains north to Hilton Drive, and the remaining southern part of the site will drain south and intercept the proposed site wall. Refer to Attachment Numbers 1 and 2 for the runoff locations and calculated flow rates for this study. The off-site area peak 100 -Year flow rate was calculated to be 11.2 CFS if the area is developed as a commercial site. The proposed 24" RCP storm draining through/under the site from Point No. 2 to Point No. 3, is designed to handle this flow rate, and, when the off-site area is developed, the property owner may connect the storm drain to this pipe. In the interim, until the off-site are is developed, a new pipe riser with debris rack cage storm drain inlet will be installed outside the concrete block wall of the site to catch existing runoff which flows east to west along the concrete block wall. 7 The on-site area of 3.07 acres, drains from the northeast, Point No. 10, to the south east to Point No. 3 through the site in "V" shaped driveways to a grate inlet catch basin, at Point No. 3, (APWA Std. Plan 305. 1, size for 2 grates). This inlet/catch basin is to be located immediately south ofthe manager's office. The peak 100 -year flow rate from this drainage area of 11.9 CFS is to be captured by the grate inlet catch basin. The off-site flow from the 24" RCP storm drain will also enter the upstream bottom end of this catch basin, and a 30" RCP will connect the outlet ofthe catch basin to the new curb inlet. The combined peak 100 -year flow rate is 27 CFS. According to the City of Fontana storm drain plans (Sheet 4 of 8, 11-21-88, Foothill Blvd., Sta. 100+50 to 111+50) the curb inlet shall be L= 7.0', V= 6.5' for Sta. 100+70 with an interception flow rate of 24.21 CFS (See Attachment No. 6). The total flow rate from the new curb inlet catch basin to the 72" Foothill Blvd. manhole is 47.3 CFS, requiring replacement ofthe existing 30" RCP with a 36" RCP. The same plans show the water surface elevation inside the manhole to be 1242.86 feet, which was considered in the WSPGW analysis. HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS A water surface pressure gradient analysis of the new storm drain system is included as Attachment No. 5 of this report, and is shown on the storm drain plans for this development. The analysis shows the water surface elevation is under pressure flow conditions inside the storm drain pipes, however, the water surface is below the storm drain surface inlet flow lines for the curb inlet, grate inlet, and the off-site pipe riser with debris rack cage storm drain inlet. SUMMARY After final grading and installation of storm drain improvements and protection, construction of the new facility and storm drain improvements will have little effect on downstream or off-site storm runoff conditions, and, will provide for on-site drainage of 100 -year storm flow conditions. Refer to the site storm drain plans for details of catch basins and pipes. 8 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 The attached hydrology study map shows the tributary area boundaries, flow pats, reference point numbers, and the 100 -year storm flow rates at points of concern. The off-site tributary area is an estimate because the grading plans are not available for this undeveloped area. Normally, the entire area, except for a dividing bank on the south side of the property, would drain to the .north to Hilton Drive. However, the current grading shows that approximately the northern 120' of the property drains in such a manner. The southerly 2.43 acres of the site will drain south to the proposed site, then westerly to the northwest corner of the site. To avoid any of this runoff entering the used car lot west of the site, a storm drain will be installed to intercept this flow and direct it in a 24" RCP to the Foothill storm drain. ¢ MLTON "®R- - - - 1255' 1262' FLAW DIRECTION `- FOOTMLL BLVD. HYDROLOGY STUDY -- ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ATTACHMENT NO.2 The attached computer printout show the flow rate calculations for the study. San Bernardino County Rational Hydrology Program (Hydrology Manual Date - August 1986) CIVILCADD/CIVILDESIGN Engineering Software, (c) 1989-2001 Version 6.4 Rational Hydrology Study Date: 08/13/01 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ City of Fontana - Lot 4 - Tract NO 13643 Foothill Blvd, Located East of Redwood, West of Hemlock Including Offsite Area N. of Site to Hilton Dr. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Joesph E. Bonadiman & Associates, San Bernardino, CA - SIN 500 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ********* Hydrology Study Control Information ********** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rational hydrology study storm event year is 100.0 10 Year storm 1 hour rainfall = 1.000(In.) 100 Year storm 1 hour rainfall = 1.450(In.) Computed rainfall intensity: Storm year = 100.00 1 hour rainfall = 1.450 (In.) Slope used for rainfall intensity curve b = 0.6000 Soil antecedent moisture condition (AMC) = 2 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++f+++t+ Process from Point/Station 1.000 to Point/Station 2.000 **** INITIAL AREA EVALUATION **** COMMERCIAL subarea type Decimal fraction soil group A = 1.000 Decimal fraction soil group B = 0.000 Decimal fraction soil group C = 0.000 Decimal fraction soil group D = 0.000 SCS curve number for soil(AMC 2) = 32.00 Pervious ratio(Ap) = 0.1000 Max loss rate(Fm)= 0.098(In/Hr) Initial subarea data: Initial area flow distance = 527.000(Ft.) Top (of initial area) elevation = 1269.000(Ft.) Bottom (of initial area) elevation = 1248.000(Ft.) Difference in elevation = 21.000(Ft.) Slope = 0.03985 s(%)= 3.98 TC = k(0.304)*[(length^3)/(elevation change)]^0.2 Initial area time of concentration = 7.104 min. Rainfall intensity = 5.216(In/Hr) for a 100.0 year storm Effective runoff coefficient used for area (Q=KCIA) is C = 0.883 Subarea runoff = 11.194(CFS) Total initial stream area = 2.430(Ac.) Pervious area fraction = 0.100 Initial area Fm value = 0.098(In/Hr) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Process from Point/Station 2.000 to Point/Station 3.000 **** PIPEFLOW TRAVEL TIME (User specified size) **** Upstream point/station elevation = 1244.000(Ft.) Downstream point/station elevation = 1240.000(Ft.) Pipe length = 227.76(Ft.) Manning's N = 0.013 No. of pipes = 1 Required pipe flow = 11.194(CFS) Given pipe size = 24.00(In.) Calculated individual pipe flow = 11.194(CFS) Normal flow depth in pipe = 10.16(In.) Flow top width inside pipe = 23.72(In.) Critical Depth = 14.40(In.) Pipe flow velocity = , 8.85(Ft/s) Travel time through pipe = 0.43 min. Time of concentration (TC) = 7.53 min. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++t+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Process from Point/Station 2.000 to Point/Station 3.000 **** CONFLUENCE OF MINOR STREAMS **** Along Main Stream number: 1 in normal stream number 1 Stream flow area = 2.430(Ac.) Runoff from this stream = 11.194(CFS) Time of concentration = 7.53 min. Rainfall intensity = 5.036(In/Hr) Area averaged loss rate (Fm) = 0.0978(In/Hr) Area averaged Pervious ratio (Ap) = 0.1000 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Process from Point/Station 10.000 to Point/Station 3.000 **** INITIAL AREA EVALUATION **** COMMERCIAL subarea type Decimal fraction soil group A = 1.000 Decimal fraction soil group B = 0.000 Decimal fraction soil group C = 0.000 Decimal fraction soil group D = 0.000 SCS curve number for soil(AMC 2) = 32.00 Pervious ratio(Ap) = 0.1000 Max loss rate(Fm)= 0.098(In/Hr) Initial subarea data: Initial area flow distance = 650.000(Ft.) Top (of initial area) elevation = 1254.880(Ft.) Bottom (of initial area) elevation = 1245.300(Ft.) Difference in elevation = 9.580(Ft.) Slope = 0.01474 s(%)= 1.47 TC = k(0.304)*[(length^3)/(elevation change)]^0.2 Initial area time of concentration = 9.426 min. Rainfall intensity = 4.402(In/Hr) for a 100.0 year storm Effective runoff coefficient used for area (Q=KCIA) is C = 0.880 Subarea runoff = 11.893(CFS) Total initial stream area = 3.070(Ac.) Pervious area fraction = 0.100 Initial area Fm value = 0.098(In/Hr) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Process from Point/Station 10.000 to Point/Station 3.000 **** CONFLUENCE OF MINOR STREAMS **** Along Main Stream number: 1 in normal stream number Stream flow area = 3.070(Ac.) Runoff from this stream = 11.893(CFS) Time of concentration = 9.43 min. Rainfall intensity = 4.402(In/Hr) Area averaged loss rate (Fm) = 0.0978(In/Hr) Area averaged Pervious ratio (Ap) = 0.1000 Summary of stream data: Stream Flow rate TC Rainfall Intensity No. (CFS) (min) (In/Hr) 1 11.194 7.53 5.036 2 11.893 9.43 4.402 Qmax(1) _ 1.000 * 1.000 * 11.194) + 1.147 * 0.799 * 11.893) + = 22.097 Qmax(2) _ 0.872 * 1.000 * 11.194) + 1.000 * 1.000 * 11.893) + = 21.650 Total of 2 streams to confluence: Flow rates before confluence point: 11.194 11.893 Maximum flow rates at confluence using above data: 22.097 21.650 Area of streams before confluence: 2.430 3.070 Effective area values after confluence: 4.883 5.500 Results of confluence: Total flow rate = 22.097(CFS) Time of concentration = 7.533 min. Effective stream area after confluence = 4.883(Ac.) Stream Area average Pervious fraction(Ap) = 0.100 r Stream Area average soil loss rate(Fm) = 0.098(In/Hr) Study area (this main stream) = 5.50(Ac.) End of computations, Total Study Area = 5.50 (Ac.) The following figures may be used for a unit hydrograph study of the same area. Note: These figures do not consider reduced effective area effects caused by confluences in the rational equation. Area averaged pervious area fraction(Ap) = 0.100 Area averaged SCS curve number = 32.0 ATTACHMENT NO.3 The attached 100 -Year 1 -Hour rainfall map is from Section B of the San Bernardino County Hydrology Manual show the Rainfall for the site area 1.45 inches. 1 r .� 0 - . . ATTACHMENT NO.4 The attached soils group map shows the area consists of Soul Group "A". .i� a, ,� = . f� ='i:Y _�•-r 11 _ - I, �tiC .1' ;''',• � �• �fq`>.-.,; 4 tiT.."*a""�_-;+Y=�°i�Y�'�'J _ . �'. _ ^'/ . _• �'•� � �_'!� � �.�� k • 1Z4 V_A_c 5 Nf I S SL I oi. 'A.4 61, 4, J ,.A _-VI -`'-r-11_ '1, 41 It c tI we. A 4,&ieY MAO, SOURCE= bcbL06Y MAP y 9n' SCS syRV7,. J. Z_ `2 _A A A • I T_ 111a --- -------- B - B L rte'. jai i_ 41 1111 N A 4. t J.7 A a iin 13 A c- 7. T A- - - - - - - 7' 1 7� n4. j ;ENO L GROUP BOUNDARY GROUP DESIGNATION SCALE 1,48,000 BOUNDARY OF INDICATED SOURCE SCALE REDUCED BY 1/2 HYDROLOGIC OILS GROUP MAP C-10 FOR SOUTHWEST -A AREA FIGURE C-5 ATTACHMENT NO.5 The attached WSPGW printout show the preliminary pipe/culvert calculations for the hydraulic grade lines. The final grading plans will show the revised HGLs with the exact pipe invert elevations. Progran Package Sar Pal Nun6en 1393 Data. 8-13-E001 T1" 11,31-22 FI In Plane. WSW City of Fontana - Fadthl ll Blvd Lot 4, Twct MM 13643 HydmullC Analysis of Catch Barin and F.•ata Inlet in Mlnl-Storaga Park C Na 3 1'TPE OPERATION STATION INV ELEY WATER LEVEL CWIN MT TYPE CHANNEL 'N' BPIER/PIP FLOW RATE VELOCITY TOP VIDTH CHAR WDTH PIER WIDTH ZL ZR SUPEL RT B SUPEL LT B CRIT DPTH RADIUS/<PT RWS (FT) <FT) (FT> (FT) <CFS) CFT/S) (FT) MFT) (FT) (FT) (FT) <FT) (FT OR < > C 13 SYSTEM OUTLET .000 1233. 720 9.140 1 000 PIPE .013 1 47.297 6. 691 .000 1 000 .000 .000 .000 .000 • 000 2.240 .000 C 23 REACH 12. 868 1238. 730 4. 193 1 000 PIPE .015 1 47. 297 6. 691 . 000 1 000 .000 .000 . 000 .000 • 000 E 240 . 000 C 33 WALL EMIR 12. 868 1238. 730 5. 199 6. 500 3OM .015 0 47.297 1.300 7.000 7.000 .000 .000 .000 .032 -. 032 1.193 11.439 C 43 JUNCTION 16 868 1238. 800 5. 066 E 500 PIPE .013 1 21 007 4. 703 .000 E 500 . 000 .000 .000 .000 .000 1.635 . 000 C 53 REACH 61 969 1239. 800 4. E98 E 500 PIPE .015 1 21 087 4. 703 . 000 E 500 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 1. 635 .000 O 63 WALL EMIR 63.969 1239. 800 4.606 SOCIO IIOM .015 0 P.3. 087 E 506 E 000 2.000 . 000 .000 .000 .000 .000 1.60 .000 C 73 JUNCTION 70. 969 1240. 000 4.511 E 000 PIPE .012 1 11. 194 2.563 . 000 E 000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 1. 200 .000 C 83 REACH 237.138 1248. 918 E 000 E 000 PIPE .013 1 11. 194 1 563 .000 E 000 .000 .000 . 000 .000 .000 1. 200 .000 C 93 REACH e47.943 1243, 108 1.814 E 000 PIPE .013 1 31. 194 1 737 1.161 E 000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 1. 200 . 000 C 103 REACH 251 567 1243. 207 I. 706 6 000 PIPE .012 1 11.194 3. 920 1.416 E 000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 1. 200 .000 C 113 REACH 257.790 1241 281 1.618 E 000 PIPE .013 1 11.194 4.111 1.572 E 000 .000 . 000 .000 .000 . 000 1.200 .000 C 123 HYD JUMP 25% 553 1241 319 1. SBO E 000 PIPE .013 1 11.194 4. 205 1. 629 E 000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 1. 200 . 000 HYD JUMP C 133 REACH 25% 555 1241 312 . 885 E 000 PIPE .013 1 11.194 E 344 1.997 E 000 .000 . 000 •000 .000 .000 1. 200 • 000 C 143 REACH 271.010 1241 513 .910 E 000 PIPE .013 1 11.194 7.947 1. 993 E 000 .000 . 000 .000 .000 .000 1. 200 .000 C 153 REACH 981.353 1241 695 .953 E 000 PIPE .013 1 11.194 7.577 1. 998 E 000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 1. PAO .000 C 163 REACH 28E 063 1241 812 .990 E 000 PIPE .013 1 11.194 7.224 E 000 E 000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 1. 200 • 000 C 173 REACH 292. 517 1241 891 1. 027 E 000 PIPE . 013 1 11,194 6. an 1. 999 E 000 . 000 .000 .000 .000 .000 1.200 • 000 C 187 REACH 298. 576 1241 944 1.066 E 000 PIPE .013 I 1I. I" 6 568 1.9% E 000 .000 .000 .000 • 000 .000 1. 200 .000 C 193 REACH 297.438 1241 977 1.106 E 000 PIPE .013 1 11,194 6. 262 1. 988 E 000 . 000 .000 .000 .000 .000 1. 200 • 000 C 200 REACH 298. 470 1241 995 1.152 E 000 PIPE .013 1 11,194 5,971 1.977 E 000 .000 . OOD . 000 .000 .000 1. 200 • 000 C 213 REACH 29E 751 1244. 000 1.200 E 000 PIPE .013 1 11.194 %697 1.960 E 000 .000 • 000 • 000 .000 .000 1. 200 .000 O 223 WALL EMIR 298.751 1244.000 1.933 4.000 BOM .013 0 11.194 .827 7.000 7.000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .430 .000 WATER SURFACE PRESSURE GRADIENT ANALYSIS (PLAN & PROFILE) NN v MY�i• � V� y d m bb b dm d OOO QQQ�Q {C. z 4 N 1253.00D 1249. 000 1245. 1241.000 1237.0 i III I I INN 1233. 000 ELEVATIONS W n N N N N NU b 66 bb 6 6m b 6$ CH_BAW SUPER_E -_______________- CRITICAL WATER INVERT .. FILE: planp.WSW W S P G W - EDIT LISTING - Version 14.03 Date: 8-14-2001 Time: 9:46:51 WATER SURFACE PROFILE - CHANNEL DEFINITION LISTING PAGE 1 CARD SECT CHN NO OF AVE PIER HEIGHT 1 BASE ZL ZR INV Y(1) Y(2) Y(3) Y(4) Y(5) Y(6) Y(7) Y(8) Y(9) Y(10) CODE NO TYPE PIER/PIP WIDTH DIAMETER WIDTH DROP CD 1 4 1 3.000 CD 2 4 1 2.500 CD 3 3 0 .000 6.500 7.000 .000 .000 .00 CD 4 3 0 .000 4.000 7.000 .000 .000 .00 CD 5 4 1 2.000 CD 6 3 0 .000 5.000 2.000 .000 .000 .00 W S P G W PAGE NO 1 WATER SURFACE PROFILE - TITLE CARD LISTING HEADING LINE NO 1 IS - City of Fontana - Foothill Blvd. HEADING LINE NO 2 IS - Lot 4, Tract No. 13643 HEADING LINE NO 3 IS - Hydraulic Analysis of Catch Basin and Grate Inlet in Mini -Storage Parking W S P G W PAGE NO 2 WATER SURFACE PROFILE - ELEMENT CARD LISTING ELEMENT NO 1 IS A SYSTEM OUTLET U/S DATA STATION INVERT SECT W S ELEV 37.000 1233.720 1 1242.860 ELEMENT NO 2 IS A REACH U/S DATA STATION INVERT SECT N RADIUS ANGLE ANG PT MAN H 49.868 1238.730 1 .013 .000 .000 .000 0 ELEMENT NO 3 IS A WALL ENTRANCE U/S DATA STATION INVERT SECT FP 49.868 1238.730 3 .500 ELEMENT NO 4 IS A JUNCTION U/S DATA STATION INVERT SECT LAT -1 LAT -2 N Q3 Q4 INVERT -3 INVERT -4 PHI 3 PHI 4 53.868 1238.800 2 4 0 .015 24.210 .000 1242.860 .000 90.000 .000 RADIUS ANGLE 11.459 -20.000 ELEMENT NO 5 IS A REACH U/S DATA STATION INVERT SECT N RADIUS ANGLE ANG PT MAN H 100.969 1239.800 2 .013 .000 .000 20.000 0 ELEMENT NO 6 IS A WALL ENTRANCE U/S DATA STATION INVERT SECT FP 100.969 1239.800 6 .500 ELEMENT NO 7 IS A JUNCTION U/S DATA STATION INVERT SECT LAT -1 LAT -2 N Q3 Q4 INVERT -3 INVERT -4 PHI 3 PHI 4 107.969 1240.000 5 4 0 .015 11.893 .000 1245.000 .000 90.000 .000 RADIUS ANGLE .000 .000 ELEMENT NO 8 IS A REACH U/S DATA STATION INVERT SECT N RADIUS ANGLE ANG PT MAN H 335.751 1244.000 5 .013 .000 .000 .000 0 ELEMENT NO 9 IS A WALL ENTRANCE U/S DATA STATION INVERT SECT FP 335.751 1244.000 4 .500 ELEMENT NO 10 IS A SYSTEM HEADWORKS U/S DATA STATION INVERT SECT W S ELEV 335.751 1244.000 4 1244.000 W S P G W PAGE NO 3 WATER SURFACE PROFILE - ELEMENT CARD LISTING FILE: planp.WSW W S P G W- CIVILDESIGN Version 14.03 PAGE 1 Program Package Serial Number: 1393 WATER SURFACE PROFILE LISTING Date: 8-14-2001 Time: 9:46:53 City of Fontana - Foothill Blvd. Lot 4, Tract No. 13643 Hydraulic Analysis of Catch Basin and Grate Inlet in Mini -Storage Park I Invert I Depth I Water I Q I Vel Vel I Energy I Super ICriticallFlow ToplHeight/IBase Wtl INo Wth Station I Elev I (FT) I Elev I (CFS) I (FPS) Head I Grd.El.I Elev I Depth I Width IDia.-FTlor I.D.1 ZL IPrs/Pip -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -t- -I- -I L/Elem ICh Slope I I I I SF Avel HF ISE DpthlFroude NINorm Dp I "N" I X-Fall1 ZR (Type Ch I I I I I I I I I I I I I 37.000 1233.720 9.140 1242.860 47.30 6.69 .70 1243.56 .00 2.24 .00 3.000 .000 .00 1 .0 12.868 .3893 .0050 .06 9.14 .00 .68 .013 .00 .00 PIPE 49.868 1238.730 4.195 1242.925 47.30 6.69 .70 1243.62 .00 2.24 .00 3.000 .000 .00 1 .0 WALL ENTRANCE I I I I I I I I I I I I I 49.868 1238.730 5.199 1243.929 47.30 1.30 .03 1243.95 .03 1.12 7.00 6.500 7.000 .00 0 .0 -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- i- JUNCT STR .0175 .0021 .01 5.23 .10 .015 .00 .00 BOX -------------------- WARNING - Junction Analysis - Change in Channel Type ! f I I I 1 ! I I I I I I 53.868 1238.800 5.066 1243.866 23.09 4.70 .34 1244.21 .00 1.64 .00 2.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -I- -I- -i- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- 1- 47.101 .0212 .0032 .15 5.07 .00 1.08 .013 .00 .00 PIPE I I I I I I I I I I I I I 100.969 1239.800 4.238 1244.038 23.09 4.70 .34 1244.38 .00 1.64 .00 2.500 .000 .00 1 .0 WALL ENTRANCE I 1 I 1 I I 7 I I I I I I 100.969 1239.800 4.606 1244.406 23.09 2.51 .10 1244.50 .00 1.61 2.00 5.000 2.000 .00 0 .0 JUNCT SIR .0286 .0020 .01 4.61 .21 .015 .00 .00 BOX -------------------- WARNING - Flow depth near top of box conduit -------------------- -------------------- WARNING - Junction Analysis - Change in Channel Type--------------- FILE: planp.WSW W S P G W- CIVILDESIGN Version 14.03 PAGE 2 Program Package Serial Number: 1393 WATER SURFACE PROFILE LISTING Date: 8-14-2001 Time: 9:46:53 City of Fontana - Foothill Blvd. Lot 4, Tract No. 13643 Hydraulic Analysis of Catch Basin and Grate Inlet in Mini -Storage Park I Invert I Depth I Water I Q I Vel Vel I Energy I Super ICriticallFlow ToplHeight/IBase Wtl INo Wth Station I Elev I (FT) I Elev I (CFS) I (FPS) Head I Grd.El.1 Elev I Depth I Width IDia.-FTIor I.D.I ZL IPrs/Pip -I- -I- -i- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -i L/Elem ICh Slope I I I I SF Avel HF ISE DpthlFroude N1Norm Dp I "N" I X -Fall) ZR (Type Ch I I I I I I I i I I I I I 107.969 1240.000 4.511 1244.511 11.19 3.56 .20 1244.71 .00 1.20 .00 2.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -i- -i- -i- -I- -i- -I- -1- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -i- 1- 166.169 .0176 .0024 .40 4.51 .00 .85 .013 .00 .00 PIPE I I I I I I I I 1 i 1 I i 274.138 1242.918 2.000 1244.918 11.19 3.56 .20 1245.12 .00 1.20 .00 2.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -i- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- 1- 10.804 .0176 .0023 .02 2.00 .00 .65 .013 .00 .00 PIPE I I I I I I I I i I I I I 284.942 1243.108 1.814 1244.922 11.19 3.74 .22 1245.14 .00 1.20 1.16 2.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -I- -I- -I- -i- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- 1- 5.625 .0176 .0022 .01 1.81 .41 .85 .013 .00 .00 PIPE i 1 I 1 i I I 1 i I I I i 290.567 1243.207 1.706 1244.913 11.19 3.92 .24 1245.15 .00 1.20 1.42 2.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -I- -1- -I- -i- -I- -i- -I- -I- -i- -I- -I- -I- -I- 1- 4.231 .0176 .0024 .01 1.71 .49 .85 .013 .00 .00 PIPE I I I I I I I I I I I I I 294.798 1243.281 1.618 1244.899 11.19 4.11 .26 1245.16 .00 1.20 1.57 2.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -i- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- 1- 1.757 .0176 .0026 .00 1.62 .55 .85 .013 .00 .00 PIPE I I I I I I I I I I I I I 296.555 1243.312 1.580 1244.892 11.19 4.21 .27 1245.17 .00 1.20 1.63 2.000 .000 .00 1 .0 HYDRAULIC JUMP 296.555 1243.312 .885 1244.197 11.19 8.34 1.08 1245.28 .00 1.20 1.99 2.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -I- -I- -I- -I- -i- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -i- -i- 1- 11.455 .0176 .0140 .16 .89 1.79 .85 .013 .00 .00 PIPE i I I I I i I I I I I I i 308.010 1243.513 .918 1244.431 11.19 7.95 .98 1245.41 .00 1.20 1.99 2.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -i- 1- 10.343 .0176 .0123 .13 .92 1.67 .85 .013 .00 .00 PIPE 318.353 1243.695 .953 1244.648 11.19 7.58 .89 1245.54 .00 1.20 2.00 2.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -I- -I- -I- -i- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -i- -I- -I- -I- 1- 6.710 .0176 .0108 .07 .95 1.55 .85 .013 .00 .00 PIPE FILE: planp.WSW W S P G W- CIVILDESIGN Version 14.03 PAGE 3 Program Package Serial Number: 1393 WATER SURFACE PROFILE LISTING Date: 8-14-2001 Time: 9:46:53 City of Fontana - Foothill Blvd. Lot 4, Tract No. 13643 Hydraulic Analysis of Catch Basin and Grate Inlet in Mini -Storage Park I Invert I Depth I Water Q I Vel Vel I Energy I Super ICriticallFlow ToplHeight/IBase Wti INo Wth Station I Elev I (FT) I Elev I (CFS) I (FPS) Head I Grd.El.1 Elev I Depth I Width IDia.-FTlor I.D.I ZL IPrs/Pip -I- -I- -I- -I- -1- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -i L/Elem ICh Slope I I I I SF Ave] HF ISE DpthlFroude NINorm Up I "N" I X-Fa111 ZR ]Type Ch I I I I I I I I I I I I I 325.063 1243.812 .989 1244.802 11.19 7.22 .81 1245.61 .00 1.20 2.00 2.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -I- -I- -I- -I- -i- -1- -i- -i- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- 1- 4.454 .0176 .0096 .04 .99 1.45 .85 .013 .00 .00 PIPE 329.517 1243.891 1.027 1244.918 11.19 6.89 .74 1245.65 .00 1.20 2.00 2.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- 1- 3.059 .0176 .0084 .03 1.03 1.35 .85 .013 .00 .00 PIPE I I I I I I I I I I I i 332.576 1243.944 1.066 1245.010 I 11.19 6.57 .67 1245.68 .00 1.20 2.00 2.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -i- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -i- 1- 1.863 .0176 .0074 .01 1.07 1.25 .85 .013 .00 .00 PIPE I i I I I i i i i i i i I 334.438 1243.977 1.108 1245.085 11.19 6.26 .61 1245.69 .00 1.20 1.99 2.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -i- 1- 1.031 .0176 .0066 .01 1.11 1.16 .85 .013 .00 .00 PIPE I I I I I I I I I I i i i 335.470 1243.995 1.152 1245.147 11.19 5.97 .55 1245.70 .00 1.20 1.98 2.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- 1- .281 .0176 .0058 .00 1.15 1.08 .85 .013 .00 .00 PIPE I I I I I i I I I I I I I 335.751 1244.000 1.200 1245.200 11.19 5.69 .50 1245.70 .00 1.20 1.96 2.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -i- -I- I - WALL ENTRANCE I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 335.751 1244.000 1.933 1245.933 11.19 .83 .01 1245.94 .00 .43 7.00 4.000 7.000 .00 0 .0 -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- -I- I- ATTACHMENT NO.6 The attached portion of a City of Fontana Storm Drain Plans for Foothill Blvd, Sta. 100+50 to 111+50, dated 11-21-88, shows the connect to the existing 72" storm drain that will be used and modified for the storm drain for this site. 12 --